HomeMy WebLinkAboutSageland PD PP 03-020~_
August 18, 2003
P P 03-020
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING AUgUSt 21, 2003
APPLICANT Quasar Development, LLC ITEM NO. ~ ~{
REQUEST Public Hearing -Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 39 building lots and 9 other
lots on 10.64 acres in a proposed R$ zone for proposed Sageland Planned Development - nec
of South Locust Grove Road and East Victory Road
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER: ~y,
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: ~'~ a~C+`CS'+e[~ S~t't C~tY19.~o
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT
CITY FIRE DEPT: See t~ttached COmments
CITY BUILDING DEPT: ~~~,~
CITY WATER DEPT: Y Q ~ ~~
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT: See attached Comments
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: See attached COmmentS
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: See attached Comments
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: See attached COmments
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: See attached COfnmentS
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: `~
OTHER: S attached le r from Todd Youren d- leYttr ~~ I"na-~1 ~
Contacted: Date: i ~ Ph ne:
Emailed: Cl(~lV .11.E Staff Initials: ~-
Materialspresented atpublic maetin shall bewma properly of the CNy of erldla
7v
L~~
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
DATE August 21, 2003 ITEM # 14
PROJECT NUMBER PP 03-020
PROJECT NAME Sageland Planned Development
NAME (PLEASE PRINT) FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL
V`~.. S~ !'~2
~ (,~4/arJ f ~
00. l
oa3
CITY OF MERIDIAN
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
MAYOR A Goad Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT
Rober[ D. Come
CITY OF MERIDIAN - (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS PUBLIC WDRK9
Tammy deWeerd 33 EAST IDAHO EUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208)898-5500 Fax 887-1297
Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Cherie McCandless (208) 886-4433 ~ FAX (208) 6874813 PLANNING AND ZONING
William L.M. Nary City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 ~ FAX 888-6854
STAFF REPORT: Hearing Date: August 21, 2003
To: Mayor, City Council and Planning,, & Zoning~Co~mQmission ~~~~D
From: Wendy Kirkpatrick, Planner II UU~ ~ ~.- ~(J~i ~ $ ZQQ3
Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech ~D ~~-~-~ ~F ~~f~~N
Re: Sageland Subdivision ~+~~ ~~-~K Q~~F~~%F
• Annexation and Zoning of 9.8 Acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-8 (Medium
Density Residential District), by Quasar Development, LLC (File No. AZ-03-
I5).
• Preliminary Plat Approval of Thirty-nine (39) Building Lots and Nine (9)
Other Lots on 9.8 Acres in a Proposed R-8 Zone, by Quasar Development,
LLC (File No. PP-03-020).
• Conditional Use Permit Approval for a Planned Development Consisting of
Thirty-nine (39) Single-family Detached Lots, One private "Neighborhood"
`:x~
Park and Eight (8) Common Lots on 9.8 Acres in a Proposed R-8 Zone. The
Proposed Planned Development Includes a Request to Allow Reduced Lot
Sizes, Reduced Frontage Requirements and Reduced Setbacks, by Quasar
Development, LLC (File No. CUP-03-036).
We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as
conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY
The applicant, Quasar Development, LLC, has applied for the Annexation and Zoning,
Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit approval of a Planned Development consisting of
39 buildable lots and 9 other lots on 9.8 acres of land located at the northeast intersection of S.
Locust Grove Road and W. Victory Road. The land is presently zoned RUT, and the applicants
have requested that upon annexation, all of the property be zoned R-8.
The applicant's preliminary plat approval request is for 39 building lots and 9 other lots. The
"other" lots include a half acre park, five open space/ landscaping lots, two micro-path lots,
AZ-03-015, PP-03-020, CUP-03-03fi Sageland Subdivuioa. AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 2
and one private road lot. The proposed residential lot sizes range from the proposed minimum
lot size of 5,000 square feet up to 7,958 square feet. The gross density of the proposed
subdivision is 3.97 dwelling units per acre and the net density of the subdivision is 4.43
dwelling units per acre. The project is a single phase development.
The Planned Development application includes requests to allow reduced development standards
including reduced setbacks, reduced lot size and reduced frontages. The applicant is not able to
ask for a deviation from Private Street standards through the Planned Development application.
The applicant will be required to submit a revised street plan showing that the proposed Private
Street meets the Private Street standards found in the MCC. The following is a comparison of
the City's minimum requirements and the reduced requirements that have been proposed by the
applicant:
Setbacks- City Reauirements (R-8) Proposed Setbacks (single family)
Front: 15' living area, 20' garage Front: 15' for non-front entry garage,
Rear: 15'
Interior Side: 5'
20' for front entry garage
Rear: 15'
Interior Side: 5'
Lot Size- Citv Reauirements (R-8)
6,500 sq.ft. (detached)
Lot Frontage- Citv Reauirements (R-8)
65'minimum (detached)
Proposed Lot Sizes
5,000 sq.ft. (detached)
Proposed Frontage
20' minimum (detached)
The applicant has proposed the following amenities to fulfill the requirement of the Planned
Development Ordinance to provide at least two amenities: 1.008 acres of common area (10.3%
of gross land area) and a twenty-foot-wide multiple use pathway along the Eight Mile Lateral.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed applications with conditions of approval.
The legal description submitted with the application appears to meet the requirements of the City
of Meridian and State Tax Commissioq and places the parcel contiguous to existing city limits.
The subject property is within the Urban Service Planning Area and essential City services aze or
can be made available to the subject property.
CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD
Chazles H. and Vickie A. Richardson are the current property owners and they have submitted an
affidavit of legal interest to allow Quasar Development to apply for the. three subject applications.
AZ-03-015, PP-03-020, CUP-03-036 Sageland Sebdiviswu AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 3
LOCATION
The property is located at the northeast intersection of S. Locust Grove Road and W. Victory
Road.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North: Sherbrooke Hollows Subdivision (Single-family residential), zoned R-4.
South: Rural residential, zoned RUT (Ada County).
East: Sherbrooke Hollows Subdivision (Single-family residential), zoned R-4.
West: Kachina Estates, (Single-family residential), zoned RUT (Ada County).
ANNEXATION & ZONING ANALYSIS
According to Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, both
the P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review the particular facts and
circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall
find adequate evidence answering the following questions about. the proposed zoning
amendment."
The following is the list of standards found in 11-15-11 and analysis by staff:
A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
Staff finds that the requested zoning designation, R-8, is harmonious with and in
accordance with the effective Comprehensive Plan (`02) and the Future Land Use
Map, which designates the land to be "Medium Density Residential. "
The Comprehensive Plan also indicates that the subject property should have a
"Multi Use" pathway running along the northern and eastern edges of the subject
property along the Eight Mile Lateral. Page 54 of the Comprehensive plan
addresses the issue of pathways and states that they should be in compliance with
the Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan (not yet adopted) and that the
pathway should be located "off street".
The applicant has indicated that they will construct a 10' asphalt multi-use
pathway with five feet of gravel on both sides of the pathway along the Eight Mile
Lateral.
AZ-03-015, PP~3-020, COP-03-036
Sageland Subdivision AZ.PBCUP
Plamung & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 4
B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the
future;
The applicant has not indicated that they anticipate rezoning the subject property in
the future.
C. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the
fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning -for example, a
residential area turning into a commercial area by means of conditional use
permits;
Staff finds that the proposed single family residential subdivision would be
allowed within the requested R-8 zone, if accompanied with a Conditional Use
Permit for a Planned Development
D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed
in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
Staff finds that the land to the north and east of the subject property has been
developed as residenfial subdivisions similar to the proposed subdivision. Staff
finds that the requested zoning designation of R-8 is harmonious with the adjacent
developments to the north and east of the subject property and should be rezoned
as requested. While the applicant has applied for an R-8 zoning designation, the
subject property is actually being developed at a density of four dwelling units per
acre.
E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the
essential character of the same area;
Staff finds that the proposed use (single family residenfial) will not change the
existing (single family residential and rural residential) or intended character
(medium density single family residential) of the area.
F. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
The Commission and Council should rely on public testimony (oral and written) to
determine whether or not the proposed uses will be disturbing or hazardous to the
existing or future neighboring uses.
Staff does not anticipate that the proposed residential uses will be hazadous or
disturbing to future or existing neighbors.
AZ-03-015, PP-03-020, CUP-DI-036 Sageland Subdivuinn AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 5
G. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the
establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of such services;
Staff finds that the property to be annexed will or can be served adequately by all
essential public facilities and services. Applicant shall be required to extend water
and sanitary sewer mains to and through the proposed development, thereby
making them available to the adjacent properties. The Fire Department has made
the following rewmmendations:
Prohibit parking on the proposed Sagemoor Lane and paint curbs of Sagemoor
Lane red. Provide Fire Department access to the South end of Sagemoor Lane via
a swing gate.
Meridian's Planned Development Ordinance requires private streets over 200' in
length to be 42' in width. The applicant will be required to revise the proposed
private street so that the street meets private street standards.
Please review ACHD and Fire Department comments concerning this subdivision
for further information regarding public services and facilities
H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community;
Staff finds that there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost
for public services and facilities and that the annexation and zoning will not be
detrimental to the community's economic welfare. The applicant will be
responsible for extending water and sewer facilities to the subject property and for
constructing all roads within the proposed subdivision.
I. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
Staff finds that the proposed subdivision will not create excessive traffic, noise or
other nuisances that would be detrimental to the general welfare of the surrounding
area.
AZ-03-015, PP-03-020, CUP.03.036 Sagdmd Subdivision AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 6
Staff recognizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase upon build-out of the
proposed subdivision; however staff does not feel that the amount generated will
be detrimental to the public welfare of the city.
J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Staff finds that the subdivision's vehicular approaches off Victory Road and
Locust Grove Road will not cause significant interference on the surrounding
public streets.
Please review ACHD comments concerning vehicular approaches and traffic
generation. ACHD recommends approval of the proposed subdivision as
submitted.
I{. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature
of major importance; and
The subject property is presently being used as pasture land. One single family
dwelling and several outbuildings aze located on the subject property. The
proposed subdivision will not result in the loss or damage of scenic or natural
features significant importance. Any existing trees larger than 4" caliper that are
removed shall be mitigated for, per the Landscape Ordinance.
L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of
Meridian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)?
Staff finds services are available to the site and that the inclusion of a pathway
that will become a part of Meridian's pathway system makes the annexation of
this property in the best interest of the City.
ANEXATION AND ZONING CONDTIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services
are available from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes
such as landscape irrigation.
2. A Development Agreement shall be required, the following shall be addressed in the
Development Agreement: pathway standards and fencing requirements for the Pathway and
micropaths.
PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS AND REQUIREMENTS
AZ-03-015, PP-03-020, CUP-03-036 Sagclmd Subdivuivv AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 7
Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed
subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the
following:
a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan;
Staff finds the subdivision to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. As
mentioned elsewhere in the staff report, the proposed subdivision meets goals of the
Comprehensive Plan through the following: providing a pathway which will become a
part of Meridian's pathway system, providing a pazk, and through the addition of a variety
of housing types to Meridian's housing inventory.
b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development;
Staff finds that public services aze available to accommodate the proposed development.
The proposed subdivision is served by an existing network of streets and water and sewer
mains aze located within close proximity to the subject property. The developers of the
Tuscany Village Subdivision, located at the southwest comer of Victory Road and Locust
Crrove Road, have proposed to extend the Ten Mile trunk line through their proposed
subdivision, rather than following Meridian's Public Works master plan which shows the
Ten Mile Trunk route following Victory Road and Locust Grove. If Council approves this
alternate route for the Ten Mile Trunk, sewer will not be readily accessible to the
developers of the Sageland Subdivision, and a substantial amount of off-site main would
have to be installed by this developer.
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement
program;
Staff finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement
funds; the developer will pay for the development of roads within the proposed
subdivision and for the extension of city services to the proposed development.
d. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
Staff finds that the development will not require major expenditures .for providing
supporting services; the developer will pay for the extension of urban services to the
subject property and for roads within the subdivision. If Counci] approves the alternate
routing of the Ten Mile trunk through the Tuscany Village subdivision sewer will not be
located within close proximity of Sageland Subdivision.
e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the
Commission's attention.
AZ-03-0I5, PP-03-020, COP-03-036 Sageland Subdivisim AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 8
Staff finds that there should not be any other health, safety or environmental problems
associated with this subdivision that may be brought to the Council or Commission's
attention.
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Private Street The applicant is proposing a 250' long and 29' wide Private Road (Sagemoor
Lane). Meridian's Planned Development Ordinance requires Private Streets over 200' in length to
be 42' in width. Meridian's Planned Development Ordinance does not allow for deviations from
Private Street standards. The applicant will be required to revise the site plan to depict a Private
Road which is 42' in width or 200' in length prior to the City Council hearing. Meridian's Fire
Department approves of the proposed Private Road configuration with the addition of a swing
gate at the south end of Sagemoor Lane and the prohibition ofpazking on Sagemoor Lane.
Reduced Lot Reauirements• The lot dimensions within the proposed subdivision are less than
those required by the current Zoning Ordinance and would not be permitted without the
applicant's request for a Planned Development. Shared driveways have been proposed for a
number of the proposed lots which do not meet the dimensional standards for the R-8 district.
The proposed shared driveways have allowed the applicant to build detached single family
homes on the smaller proposed lots located on the northern side of the proposed W. Sagemoor
Drive. Staff does not object to the requested reduced dimensions of the lots.
Shared Driveways: The applicant is proposing shared driveways at the following locations:
Lots 37 and 38, Block 2
Lots 38 and 39, Block 2
Lots 46 and 47, Block 2
Lots 16 and 17, Block 1
Lots 17 and 18, Block 1
Lots 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12,13,14, and 15, Block 1
Staff supports the use of shared driveways in the proposed subdivision. The developer's subject
property has a number of constraints including: the relatively small size of the subject property,
existing structures on the subject property and trees that the developer is attempting to preserve.
The shared driveways are an innovative way to deal with site constraints.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS /PRELIMINARY PLAT
1. Sanitary sewer 'and water service to this site shall be via main line extensions from
existing mains in the area. Applicant will be responsible for constructing the sewer and
water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to
coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department
AZ-03-0I5, PP-03-020, COP-03036 Sagelaud Subdivisio¢ AZ.PP.CIIP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 9
The developers of the Tuscany Village Subdivision, located at the southwest corner of
Victory Road and Locust Grove Road, have proposed to extend the Ten Mile trunk line
through their proposed subdivision, rather than following Meridian's Public Works master
plan which shows the Ten Mile Trunk route following Victory Road and Locust Grove. If
the Meridian City Council approves this alternate route for the Ten Mile Trunk at their
September 9`h meeting, sewer will not be readily accessible to the developers of the
Sageland Subdivision, and a substantial amount of off-site main would have to be installed
by this developer.
2. A permanent pedestrian easement, in favor of the City of Meridian, shall be recorded for
the pedestrian pathway prior to the final plat being recorded. The instrument number for
the easement shall be referenced on the final plat. The easement shall be sufficient width
to cover the 20-foot wide pathway shown. The 10-foot wide hard surfaced pathway shall
be constructed and fully improved prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy for any building within the subdivision. Additionally, a note shall be added to
the face of the final plat indicating the City of Meridian is responsible for the maintenance
of the pathway surface located within the easement. The note shall also indicate who will
be responsible for landscaping maintenance within the easement.
3. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on
site. The applicant has indicated that the pressurized irrigation system within this
development is to be connected to an existing Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
system. If a single-point backup connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible
for the payment of assessments for the common azeas prior to signature on the final plat
by the Meridian City Engineer.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted with the final plat application. The detailed
landscape plan shall include a 6' wrought iron fence along the western and southern edges
of the proposed neighborhood pazk to make it more difficult for children using the
neighborhood park to come into contact with traffic on Locust Grove Road and Victory
Road.
5. Revise the proposed Private Street to meet the Private Street standards of Meridian's
Planned Development ordinance.
6. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H.
7. Please submit up-to-date groundwater monitoring report to the Public Works Department
for review. The report submitted with the application only idenfifies the groundwater
elevation on the day the test holes were dug in April. The initial study indicates that
shallow groundwater may be a factor. All drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must
be designed to ensure that water is retained only during 100-year storm events, and for a
period of time not to exceed 24 hours. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed
3:1. The project engineer should pay close attention to the results of field studies
determining the groundwater, soil type & and characteristics during the design and
construction phases. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline
AZ-03-015, PP-03-020, CUP-03-076 Sagelmd Subdivision AZ.PP.COP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 10
elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established normal groundwater
elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at
least 1-foot above groundwater.
8. Sidewalks shall be installed within the subdivision and on the perimeter of the subdivision
pursuant to MCC 12-13-10-8.
9. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
10. Add or revise the following preliminary plat notes:
•Add a note to the face of the plat that requires any re-subdivision of this plat to be in
compliance with the most recently approved subdivision standards of the City of
Meridian.
•Add a note to the face of the plat stating that no sight-obscuring fence shall be taller than
four feet in height.
11. Ten (10) copies of a revised plat shall be submitted to the City Clerk's Office at least ten
days prior to the next public hearing for this plat.
GENERAL COMMENTS
1. Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's approval letter for the
subdivision name, and the lot and block numbering. Make any corrections necessary to
conform.
2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
3. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing,
landscaping, play equipment, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to
signature on the final plat.
4. All micro-paths within the proposed subdivision shall be designed in accordance with
MCC 12-13-15 "Micropath Landscaping".
5. A detailed landscape plan, in compliance with the landscape ordinance shall be submitted
for the subdivision with the final plat application.
6. Sidewalks within the proposed subdivision shall be built in accordance with MCC12-13-
10-8.
7. 250 and 100-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations
designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at
subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
AZOJ-0I5, PP-03-020, C[1P-03-036 Sageld Subdivision AZ.PP.C[1P
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 11
Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs aze completed by
Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the
Public Works Department prior commencing installations.
The subject property has a number of mature trees. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is
removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the
equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed. Required landscaping
trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to be removed.
9. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
10. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells
may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
11. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all
building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
12. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that
all street finish centerline elevations aze set a minimum of three feet above the highest
established normal groundwater elevation.
STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USES
The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each
proposed conditional use in teens of the following and may approve a conditional use permit if
they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11-17-3):
A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open
spaces, parking landscaping and other features as may be required by this
ordinance;
Staff finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the requested use and
all required yards, open spaces and other features required by this ordinance.
B. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance;
The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the property as "Medium
Density Residential. Staff finds that the proposed residential uses are harmonious with and
in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.
The project is being proposed as a conditional use for a planned development in order to
allow reduced lot sizes, reduced street frontages, and reduced setbacks. If the project is
approved as a Planned Development, with a Variance from Private Road dimensional
standards, it will meet the minimum requirements of the MCC.
AZ03-015, PP-03-030, CUP-03-03fi Sageland Subditision AZ.PP.C[IP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 12
C. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible with
other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of
the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential
character of the same area;
Staff finds that the proposed residential subdivision use will be harmonious with the
intended and existing character of the area. Property to the north and east of the subject
property has been developed as asingle-family residential subdivision with an R-4 zoning
designation. Property to the south and west of the subject property is designated as RUT
(Ada County) and is designated as Low Density Residential (to the west of the subject
property) and Medium Density Residential (to the south of the subject property.)
D. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will
not adversely affect other property in the vicinity;
Staff does not anticipate that the proposed project will have an adverse impact on other
properties within the vicinity; however, the Commission and Council should consider any
testimony (written and oral) presented at the public hearings before making this finding.
E. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of
proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services;
Staff finds that the proposed development will be adequately served by the essential public
facilities and services listed above. The applicant will extend sewer and water to the
subject property and the proposed subdivision will be served by an existing roadway
network and City of Meridian police and fire protection.
F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost
for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare
of the community;
Staff finds that the proposed use would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the
community, nor would it create the need for any new facilities or services to be paid for by
the public that would be considered excessive. The developer will pay for the extension
of existing sewer and water lines to the proposed development and for roads within the
subdivision.
G. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment,
and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or
general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes,
glare or odors;
AZ~03~~15, PP-03-020, C[/P-03-036 Sagelavd Subdivision AZ.PP.COP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 13
Staff finds that there will be an increase in traffic and noise in the general vicinity if the
subdivision is approved, but that approval of the subdivision will not lead to a major
increase in smoke, fumes, glare, odors or other disturbances that will be considered
detrimental to the welfare of the City and the subdivision's neighbors.
H. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be
so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Staff finds that the proposed use will not create significant interference with any traffic on
the surrounding public streets.
Please review the ACHD report for this project for additional information regazding this
finding. ACHD has recommended approval of the proposed subdivision as submitted.
I. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural,
scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
Staff does not find that any natural or scenic feature will be lost, damaged or destroyed by
issuance of this conditional use. Existing trees greater than 4" caliper must be retained or
mitigated for, if removed.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS (Conditional Use Permit)
Applicant shall meet all of the requirements of the preliminary plat as a condition of the
Conditional Use Permit.
2. All development shall comply with the Americans-with Disabilities Act and the Fair
Housing Act.
The reductions to the frontage and minimum lot sizes are approved as submitted.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
Chapter VI, Goal III, Objective A, Action 3:
Provide a variety of park types (neighborhood parks, regional parks) interspersed
throughout the community.
The development's proposed half-acre park meets the intent of this Comprehensive Plan Action
Chapter VH, Goal V, Objective A, Action 4:
Provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular; mobile homes and
multi-family arrangements) and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all
income groups in a variety of location suitable for residential development.
AZ-03-0I5, PP-03-070, CUP-03-036 Sagelavd Subdivuiov AZ.PP.CIIP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 14
The proposed single-family homes with their diversity of building styles, building materials, and
side-entry garages meet the intent of this Comprehensive Plan Action. The proposed single-
familyhomes will help to diversify the types of housing available in Meridian by providing
additional housing choices.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation rezone, preliminary plat, and conditional
use pernvt with the aforementioned fmdings and conditions. If the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends that the applicant makes substantial changes to the application staff
recommends that the hearing be continued to allow staff and the Planning and Zoning
Commission additional time to review changes made to the application.
AZ-03-015, PP-03-O]0, CUP-03.036 SageUvd Subdivuivv AZ.PP.CUP
~~ ~ ~1 ~v~ss~av.~s~
C9~ ~,~.1~10.-v~sk n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~G~
~-l~, ~usk Z~5 j ~a~
/ ~~J\G~e +~~
~~ ~ ~`~ ~~
~~--o ~ ~
'ZPS~ 3
1 1~'~
~v Y15 ti~3
~~°G~~~~
G~~~ G~Fa
G~~
TUSCANY DEVELOPMENT, INc
P.O. Box 344, Meridian, ID 83680
(208) 888-9946 (208) 888-9947 FAX
August 15, 2003
j~ECEIVED
Brad Watson, P.E.
Meridian City Engineer
660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 200
Meridian, ID 83642
Re: Tuscany Village
Sewer Issues
Dear Brad,
AUG 1 5 y003
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK OFFlCF
As you are aware, the preliminary plat for Tuscany Village was approved by Planning
Commission last week. As a condition of approval, we are to meet with the area
neighbors to discuss the controversy over our proposed realignment of the 27" trunk line
through our property prior to our City Council meeting on September 9'", 2003. Prior to
meeting with the area residents, we are forwarding additional supporting information for
you review and information. We would appreciate Meridian's support for our superior
alignment that will save money for Tuscany Development, the City of Meridian, and
future sewer wmmectors in this area. At the same time, development will finance and pay
a proportionate share for sewer infrastructure.
Exhibit `A' indicates the sewer infrastructure installed by Tuscany Development to date.
We have installed over 20,000 feet of 8"-27" sewer main to service our development and
upstream properties on our project boundaries on Locust Grove, Eagle, and Victory
Road.
Exhibit `B' indicates the completion of our 27" sewer infrastructure as proposed and
submitted. We understand that if City Council decides to approve Tuscany Village on
September 9, 2003, we will be able to construct in accordance with preliminary plat and
submitted sewer plans immediately. To stay ahead of home construction, this work needs
to commence in September and will require approacimately 2 weeks to complete.
Exhibit `C' indicates the proposed completion of Tuscany Village and Messina Hills #2
near[ spring which will extend sewer service to the property lines of additional properties
in the service area. In accordance with standard development practice, adjacent
properties may connect with the earisting right-of--way or a negotiated easement.
Alternatively, they may wait for sewer to be extended by adjacent properties.
Exhibit `D' indicates the service area and property impacted by the Master Plan route in
Victory and Locust Grove Road. Since a majority of the Ktrntz/DeChambeau property
may be served through Tuscany Lakes, the service area is approximately 92 acres with
the majority of parcels under 10 acres. The Tuscany Development properties including
Tuscany Village total approximately 590 lots on 220 acres.
Exhibit `E' is an excerpt from a Sewer Master Plan Report by NB Engineers, Inc
indicating half-fiall service capacities for various sewer pipe sizes at an assumed
development density of 3.5 per acre. Even if the impacted service area of 92 acres
developed at a greater density, a 10" line appears to be more than adequate. In addition, a
27" line is designed at half-full to service 9,244 lots/services. Our "large" project of 590
lots only requires a 10"-12" line and utilizes only 6.4% ofthe half capacity of a 27" line.
Exhibit `F' is our cost to construct all sewer infrastructure shown on Exhibit `B'
including our preferred trunk route.
Exhibit `G' is the cost to construct the 27"sewer in the current Master Plan alignment.
In addition, the cost to construct an 8" sewer line in the preferred alignment is indicated.
The overall cost difference is approximately $146,000_ This amount may increase due to
the variable costs associated with 2 bore crossings and major pavement replacement.
The point and purpose of the various exhibits is to clearly demonstrate Tuscany
Development has installed significant sewer infrastructure in the area that is vastly
oversized for our development or any other properties in the immediate vicinity. To
require our development to install additiona127" sewer in Locust Grove and Victory
roads when a more economical alignment is available is a huge waste of Tuscany
Development and City money.
The final point of this letter is to inform the City of Meridian we are proceeding with the
completion of sewer infrastructure for our upstream developments dependent on this
alignment September 10's, 2003. We will respect whatever decision the informed City
Council makes regarding this issue. ff our request is denied, we will construct the sewer
in Victory and Locust Grove Road at our cost and request reimbursement from the City
for the difference indicated above in addition to the normal oversizing reimbursement.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information.
Sincerer
Matthew Schultz, P
Project Manager
Cc: City Clerk, Meridian
Dean Briggs, P.E., Briggs Engineering
Brent Claiborne, P.E., Clairbome Waite Engineering
3~~b'3
z
w
0
J
W
W
D
}
Z
Q
U
H
m
O
W
W
J
W
O
U
W
W
Z
~_
X
W
Q
H
m
X
W
Z_
Q
I~
N
L~
O
O
O
0
0
N
O
O
N
Q
3~~b3
}
O
H
1S
z
w
w
O
J
W
W
Z
Q
U
m
w
w
O
Z
O
1-
w
J
O
U
w
O
O
m
m_
x
w
r~
O
O
N
H
U
O
3~~`dS
z
w
w
0
J
W
W
}
W'
O
Z
Q
U
}
m
Z
O ~
~ O
w O
J N
W ~
~ Z
O -
U ~
~ ~
W
W
W
O
1S ~0 ~
w
U
~--
H
m
S
X
W
~~~d~
w
0
z
c
J
W
(/7
a
r
m
0
w
U
Q
f/7
W
W
H
m
2
X
W
w
U
Q
N
Parcel # Name Acres % Address
1 Mr. and Mrs. Lonnie Agnew 4 4.3% ,sso E. viaory, 63saz
2 Ms. Catherine Jerrems 6 6.5% 3245 S. Locust Grove
3 Quasar Development 10 10.9% CWE, 146, S.T~re Ave
4 Mr. Russell Liddell 7 7.6% ,777 E. v~mry
5 Ms. Susan Howard 7 7.6% 3420 S. Locust Grove
6 Mr. and Mrs. Charles Richardson 7 7.6% 1835 E. Victory
7 Mr. and Mrs. Webb 4 4.3% ,975 E. Victory
8 Mr. Charles Creech 6 6.5% 2310 E. VtGory
9 Mr. Clayton Record 5 5.4% 4355 E. Victory
10 Mr. Marvin Hansen 6 6.5% 246° E. Victory
11 Ms. Luann Kuntz 30 32.6% 48° W. Holmes, Boise, 83704
Ms. Mary DeChambeau 20,5 E. Victory
Total 92 100.0%
U
LL
f3
Z
Y
W
a
J
Q
U
y
W
a
N
~ u
Z a'
~ m
a
am
F
Q w
a o
U a
W ~
U ~
D
Q 0
WLL
d
~a
W
y LL
J
Q T
V m
ar
Y R
F- a
y .- . N W h:N ~ NCO C7 O <O~V N O V 01 (p d' V n r CO V'Ln,(h W W
U {fl r NIV c7'011 C0-r 1~ m O); Cn WPM (h V I~ r h1n;f~':
7 V O'. CO;N o~ O
•~ d £ O O O1O r N ~
l
i t11 01 ''1n (') CO'O O OO r i
N~c7'!!1 I~ oJlOr O V
Q ~ i
i
I r~N V'fA ~ I INS CJ (D O
N ' I
I '. ~ I
- _
~
U m ^ ~ W~rln AIM Imo.
~ l[i r
V-O
~
n
N 'f~
~ CA c9 ~1~ N
O~ f0 PJ (O.a ~': C7 'O)
r:If1
O; f~ ~W ~
t`
h ~~V:OJ M O)
C O
~
.' ~ t1 r,:N c0 N'CO.
' (
D C
~]'
C7
' V r o~:,v ~ ,
co;v v ~ r~ c~~m rn~~ S
r a. Q r
N fD (D
'O'T T - it '. r'r'~NiW V W C71m 0~':fD
r
'
~ ~ ~ i ~
m 6f
C cOV:M O]
~ N~I~ W
~ 01O iCJd' I~IO h RI(O'N W:P7 ~:r~W 01 01~:.r ld' M:O1 ~
p
W
• W
7
N d'~tOICA O1O;LL7;
O W
V N t1i O'~r W
1~ f7
n'u'1 N~tO
CO-tn O) 01_M'W
W O
'ln O'r' O
O)
COi~ r O;r N
i
r O).(7 c
~ .,,
. ; ,
~ .~ ~
r t O)
N.r N r n
C
d
d ? WIV if001 N N'1!)
'M
N
M
W R.~
O
h r N
I O')'In~N N
i l W'01 '(OjC1i
' (O (n C
~ ~ I :
. . I ir
I NIV CO c7c0
I C
C W'O (O'CD (O CA ~'fO.M 1I1 OyoJ:(O r'r N 7~1 O~f7 I~ tO:NiN N 1A ~iN-O fA-N 3
d O
~ . ~.N Iu7
~'r n;m 0 1nlf~CO
vlo;o W N.7101:ro
n v
rn;o -W
1n m N W'W ~
rn o!~n r M 1fi1O
m n
cq'
rn WPM t`
co ~ r,IW M r
con a
u
'> jp N [0 N m 1A _
W N ~ Oi O [h C7 r C7 7 I~ ,
,
O ~ c7 07 (C1 ~ O I~ u'i N 2
~ I
I rir~N CO W
T ~ N N r
r N'c7 V W,('71, 0~ ~.~
a I I 1 r r
Ul O
i
i
v
a I i I I I
l
~
~ 2
d T
~ ~. CA ~, R1
Oi .NIC'i •C 01 ~O
O ~ N N N M oJ'h
7 h M'N M
n
M Cri V cO~I~
CA
N C'J ill W 1t) [7:0
N
(7'O>-01'N CP ~ O)~1n
f~ ' ,
N V O
N N
N = G C O,OI OIO r rIN:c0 7 I~N•m M ~ 0
010 O r r~N HIV .
ul OI~Dd' I~ O ~'
i , r N 7 [D '
Q !A : I I I ': ': I ~ I i a
I i m
'O ~ ~
~
fD I~ W~W
Ln~O~ O
O,V Ir.N
1~ W
u7. V:o7 O
h~[O: C1 ~'.N
N h': 10:(D
N'7 U
m
o
ornmr
vMryr
om;~;co
vm
mnmCll
c~N,ro
rnn,coln
q~
~ V M N NCV N (VN N CV r r r r N N:N N CU CV',N,N r ~
T
r r O-
U
LL ~ ~ I ~ 'I
4. I
~
~
~
I , ~
d G7
> C p t0
f~ W N
O CA W : t` Ln V
~O
7 (*1 N r O.V
N
O [O 1~ (O f~ CD
~ c7 111 R (''l O
CO h tD W f~
W.M
N
P7 N r '' O N r N W
01 I~ . cD l[7 N a
~ c] c
o
~ Y V CO 'N NON NN CV N N~r N N'N N N'N N;N r ~ r 'mC
S
a I
~ i I
T OJ f7',r
- 111 O~
IO co 1n N'N:O M~CO O> d• O) N ~O•M'f~ V 01 CO:N 1[1
~ V Wm
N
~ i11 ,C O~;I~
~ CO NN:O 111 [A (OO:V N N:V N V
' r oO t011~ c0 r
W O r O
O~O
O N~,CO
V
(O W C
M u~ O rjr CV P]
d''. (O m .- ~'~~It` r a0 c
m
a C LL b i
1 i I
~' I N'
~ I i I r N'07 (O O ~
W
y ~ r ~
m
E fh W h r
OO O:r Ch W N' M
C`7;V h.O N W O] O1
~ V Cn ICA 7^
f~ N T CO 01
O : N V (7 V 1f1
V_O O) c] h (O. N~ M
[O NN a7 t` rte--
N' Q
- =.%r
O:;O O O
O:O',O r
r.N.['i,~
r0
O.O~O O
O O Or
~ M:ui.l~
~ [O c
o
W= B i
I
~ 1 ~ I r:N N ~ I I I ~ r.N ~
£
Y ~
h W.N
W ~ n W
'
W. 01
fO cO
.d.
h (O W
W N t`~N
LOO ~
m 01 ~
m
N P1 V cC1;0 .(O!1~
CO CA N.I~ N 01 Nr tl1 h r(p tq CD-O.r:W O r O>.W 1O'N !3
O d O V O O'O,;r N, M'~f~ O tD 47,1f) In (O >` Or,r N C'9 1f]n:p t+i 111 CV'7 ~
{- a IL v ~ 1 : : r N M W O W i r N M V fD (O m
01 n
tD tD fO (O LL) W U1 ~o Itl ~ t11 1!7 1(] W N C Ch M M M C1 [7 C`7 C7 M M . (h C'1 M ch
C ~'+ 0 0 0 0
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !!1 O O O O O~O O O O O O O O O A
1 ~ C O,C C
O O O O O C O O-C O O W O C O O G.O O ~'0 0 o O C o o ~
m
,~ m
d a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e o 0 o M o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O CO N u'1 N 0 0 0 O O O O O O O CD N 1 n N O O O O 0 0 0 0 0
~ C.N Nr
~ r r r r r-r r r r r T V N N r r r r r
~ r r r r r
N C CiO
G O;C G C O O, O,C G O ~ O C G O O
CO O O O,O O O O
r 1n 1n 1n 1n
oooc 1n 1n 1n u1
nnr~r~ 1n 1n lf1 1n
nnn~ 1n 1n
nr~ ¢ r r
r
r
'-
r
r
Tr
p a w : c c,o',o 0 0 o':c o d LL ,
' l
. ~ o
~ ~ •a
I
I
0 ,
l a
~ 1
~ H
~ a
"
N If1
c0'O CO C.1~ O
tD
N !D O N a CO 0 T
i1Y W a
r O W N CO O N a
0~ C r r,,r r N'N N M'M,~•~ W h y r r N N;N C7 C7 7 'ct (O i~
1 w
i c
I
Y
i
c
0
' n
oa
m
m
7
N y
~ a ~
n
L
~~ 3
~ o „^
m
~, c a
n c
2 oe
c a
~ C O~
U C "'
C y
~ nl O
~ a
a
o ~ o
U
N ~ U
: 'ti O
m a ~
m c
3 0 am o
as c m
0 m o =
m c E
c
E ~ To
c a
E 'c^w~
E ~
a m a ani
o ~ v
c c
m `m m
N ~ cq
m1
~~
.~
:~
T
c
N
o c
m
a
m N
o. m
m ~ d
n ~ ~
i a m
o
_ y
m a
~ 3 H
.. 9 ~
c d ~
N [1 O)
0 _m c
U o- m
Cn7 a° o
o m ~n
m N (7
m o 0 0 0 0 0
m a m a a a a
m m m m m
° m ~ m m m m
N
N
x
.T.
U
ti
a
m
U
a~
U
d
¢~
3
a~
TUSCANY DEVELOPMENT, INC.
MESSINA VILLAGE #1
PREFERRED ROUTE -SEWER GOST
11-Jul-03
Prepared By: Matthew Schultz, P.E.
Offsite Sewer Through Tuscany Lakes #1
Depth
Item Range Quantity Unit Price Total
27" Sewer 28' - 24' 60 $83.00 $4,980.00
27" Sewer 24' - 20' 614 $76.00 $46,664.00
27" Sewer 20' - 16' 3037 $63.00 $191,331.00
24" Sewer 20' - 16' 920 $52.D0 $47,840.00
15" Sewer 28' - 24' 45 $52.00 $2,340.00
15" Sewer 24' - 20' 40 $46.00 $1,840.00
15" Sewer 20' - 16' 644 $38.00 $24,472.00
15" Sewer 18'- 12' 1463 $32.00 $46,816.00
15" Sewer 12' - 8' 290 $25.00 $7,250.00
48" Manhole 16' - 12' S $1,700.D0 $8,500.00
48" Manhole 12'- 8' 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
60" Manhole 28' - 24' 1 $3,700.OD $3,700.00
60" Manhole 24' - 20' 2 $3,300.00 $6,600.00
60" Manhole 20' - 16' 19 $2,800.00 $53,200.00
36" Sleeve NA 60 $130.00 $7,800.00
AC Replace NA 3D650 $1.50 $45,975.00
Gravel Access NA 1887 $8.00 $15,096.00
Subtotal $515,904.00
Offsite Sewer Through Future Development
Depth
Item Range Quanti Unit Price Total
15" Sewer 24' - 20' 1484 $46.00 $68,264.00
15" Sewer 20' - 16' 2793 $38.OD $106,134.00
4" Sewer NA 1812 $10.50 $19,026.00
Sewer Tee NA 52 $125.00 $6,500.00
60" Manhole 24' - 20' 9 $3,300.00 $29,700.00
60" Manhole 2D' - 16' 14 $2,800.00 $39,200.00
24" Sleeve NA 120 $120.00 $14,400.00
Gravel Access NA 2218 $8.00 $17,744.00
Subtotal $300,968.D0
` Messina Village #1 Onsite Sewer
Depth
Item Range uantit Unit Price Tgtal
15" Sewer 20' - 16' 345 $38.00 $13,110.00
15" Sewer i6' - 12' 492 $32.00 $15,744.00
8" Sewer 20' - 16' 432 $28.00 $12,096.00
', 8" Sewer 16' - 12' 949 $24.00 $22,776.00
8" Sewer 12' - 8' 1814 $16.50 $29,931.00
8" Sewer 8' - 6' 83 $14.00 $1,162.00
4" Sewer NA 2176 $10.50 $22,848.00
15"Sewer Tee NA 13 $125.00 $1,625.00
8"Sewer Tee NA 39 $39.00 $1,521.00
60" Manhole 20' - 16' 1 $2,800.00 $2,800.00
48" Manhole 20' - 16' 2 $1,900.00 $3,800.00
48" Manhole 16' - 12' 8 $1,700.D0 $13,6D0.00
48" Manhole 12' - 8' 9 $1,500.00 $13,500.00
48"Manhole 8'-6' 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00
Cleanout NA 3 $550.00 $1,650.00
Subtotal ~ $157,363.00
TOTAL $974,235.00
TUSCANY DEVELOPMENT, INC. ~~1~ 1 f~ ( 1
MESSINA VILLAGE #1
MASTER PLAN ROUTE -SEWER COST
11-Jul-03
Prepared By: Matthew Schultz, P.E.
Offsite Sewer Through Tuscany Lakes #1
Depth
Item Range Quantity Unit Price Total
27" Sewer 28' - 24' 60 $83.00 $4,980.00
27" Sewer 24' - 20' 614 $76.00 $46,664.00
27" Sewer 20' - 1fi' 3522 $63.00 $221,886.00
24" Sewer 20' - 16' 920 $52.00 $47,840.00
15" Sewer 28' - 24' 45 $52.00 $2,340.00
15" Sewer 24' - 20' 40 $46.00 $1,840.00
15" Sewer 20' - 16' 644 $38.00 $24,472.00
15" Sewer 16' - 12' 1463 $32.00 $46,816.00
15" Sewer 12' - 8' 290 $25.00 $7,250.00
48" Manhole 16' - 12' S $1,700.00 $8,500.00
48" Manhole 12' - 8' 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
60" Manhole 28' - 24' 1 $3,700.00 $3,700.00
60" Manhole 24' - 20' 2 $3,300.00 $6,600.00
60" Manhole 20' - 16' 14 $2,800.00 $39,200.00
36" Sleeve NA 6D $130.00 $7,800.00
36" Bore NA 100 $406.40 $40,640.00
AC Replace NA 58572 $1.50 $87,858.00
Gravel Access NA 800 $8.00 $6,400.00
Subtotal
Offsite Sewer Through Future Development
$606,286.00
Depth
Item Rance uanti Unit Price Total
15" Sewer 24' - 20' 1484 $46.00 $68,264.00
15" Sewer 20'-16' 2793 $38.00 $106,134:D0
4" Sewer NA 1812 $10.50 $19,026.00
Sewer Tee NA 52 $125.00 $6,500.00
60" Manhole 24' - 20' 9 $3,300.00 $29,700.00
60" Manhole 20' - 16' 14 $2,800.00 $39,200.00
24" Sleeve NA i20 $120.00 $14,400.00
Gravel Access NA 2218 $8.00 $17,744.00
t ~ t
Subtotal $300,968.00
Messina Village #1 Onsite Sewer
Depth
Item Range Quantity Unit Price Total
15" Sewer 20' - 16' 345 $38.00 $13,110.00
15" Sewer 16'-12' 492 $32.00 $15,744.00
8" Sewer 20' - 16' 432 $28.00 $12,096.00
8" Sewer 16' - 12' 949 $24.00 $22,776.00
8" Sewer 12' - 8' 1814 $16.50 $29,931.00
8" Sewer 8' - 6' 83 $14.00 $1,162.00
4" Sewer NA 2176 $10.50 $22,848.00
15"Sewer Tee NA 13 $125.00 $1,625.00
8"Sewer Tee NA 39 $39.00 $1,521.00
60" Manhole 20' - 16' 1 $2,800.00 $2,800.00
48" Manhole 20'- 16' 2 $1,900.00 $3,800.00
48" Manhole 16' - 12' 8 $1,700.00 $13,600.00
48" Manhole 12' - 8' 9
~ $1,500.00 $93,500.00
48"Manhole 8'-6' 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00
Cleanout NA 3 $550.00 $1,650.00
Subtotal $157,363.00
Tuscany Village #1 Onsite Sewer
Depth
Item Range Quart' Unit Price Total
8" Sewer 20' - 16' 200 $28.00 $5,600.00
8" Sewer 16' - 12' 950 $24.00 $22,800.00
8" Sewer 12'- 8' 950 $16.50- $15,675.00
48" Manhole 20' - 16' 1 $1,900.00 $1,900.00
48" Manhole 16' - 12' 3 $1,700.00 $5,100.00
48" Manhole 12' - 8' 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00
Subtotal $55,575.00
TOTAL $1,120,192.00
Master Plan Route $1,120,192
Preferred Route $974,235
Difference $745,957
~~~k
"~"`~°'' Ada County Highway District
~7fh Sfraaf
Susan S. Eastlake, 1st Vice President Garden City ID 837146499
Dave Bivens, 2nd Vice President Phone (208) 387-6100
David E. Wynkoop, Commissioner FAX (208) 387-6391
John S. Franden, Commissioner E-mail: tellus o~CHD.ada.id.us
July 23, 2003
To: Quasar Development, LLC
3090 Gentry Way
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Subject: Sagleand Subdivision/MPP03-020/MAZ03-015
39-lot residential subdivision
Northeast corner of Locust Grove Road and Victory Road
RECEIVED
Jt1L 2 5 2003
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
On July 22, 2003, the Ada County Highway District acted on your application for the above
referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of approval and
street improvements, which are required.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 208-387-6177.
Principal Development Ar~afyst
Right-of-way & Development Services
Planning Division
CC: Planning & Development project file
City of Meridian
Construction Services
Drainage
Utilities
Brent A Claiborn
Claiborn Waite Consulting LLC
1461 South Teare Avenue
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Charles H and Vickie A Richardson
1835 East Victory Road
Meridian, Idaho 83642
.,~'~-~11'A,.
Ada County Highway District
& Development Department
Planning Review Division
This application does not require Commission acfion and is approved at the staff level as of Tuesday July 22,
2003. Tech Review for this item was held with the applicant on Tuesday July 22, 2003. Please refer to the
attachmenf for appeal guidelines. Staff contact: Andrea N. Tuning, 208-387-6977-phone, 208-387-6393-fax,
atuninaC~achd.ada.id. us
File Numbers: Sageland Subdivision / MPP03-0201 MAZ03-015 / MCUP03-036
Site address: Northeast corner of Locust Grove Road and Victory Road
Owner: Charles and Vickie Richardson
1835 East Victory Road
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Applicant: Quasar Development LLC
3090 Gentry Way
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Representative: Claiborn Waite Consulting
Brent A. Claibom
1461 South Teare Avenue
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Application Information:
The applicant has submitted an annexation, rezone, conditional use and preliminary plat application to the
City of Meridian for review and approval. The applicant is proposing to construct a 39-lot residential
subdivision on 10.64-acres. The site is currently zoned RUT and is proposed to be rezoned to R-8. The site
is located on the northeast corner of Victory Road and Locust Grove Road.
Acreage: 10.64-acres
Current Zoning: RUT
Proposed Zoning: R-8
Buildable Lots: 39
Common Lots: 9
Vicinity Map
A. Findings of Fact
Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 380 additional vehicle trips per day (10
existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual.
2. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of a building
permit. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that
time.
3. Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was not required with this application.
4. Site Information: The site currently has one existing single-family dwelling.
5. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
a. North: Sherbrook Hollow Subdivision (single-family residential)
b. South: 3.89-acres that is primarily agricultural with asingle-family dwelling
c. East: Sherbrook Hollow Subdivision (single-family residential)
d. West: 7.583 and 7.620-acre sites that are primarily agricultural parcels with single-family
dwellings
6. Impacted Roadways
Victory Road
Frontage: 951-feet
Functional Street Classification: Collector
Traffic count: East of Locust Grove Road was 3,555 on 4-2-02
Level of Service: Currently better than C
Speed limit: 45 MPH
Locust Grove Road
Frontage: 534-feet
Functional Street Classification: Section Line
Traffic count: South of Victory Road was 1,176 on 4-2-02
North of Victory Road was 1,363 on 3-19-02
Level of Service: Currently better than C
Speed limit: 40 MPH
7. Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site
Victory Road is currently improved with 2-traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the
site.
Locust Grove Road is currently improved with 2-traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting
the site.
8. Existing Right-of-Way
Victory Road currently has a total of 50-feet of right-of-way (25-feet from centerline).
Locust Grove Road has a total of 50-feet of right-of-way (25-feet from centerline).
9. Existing Access to the Site
The site currently takes access to Victory Road from an existing 50-foot wide driveway that intersects
Victory Road approximately 470-feet east of Locust Grove Road.
2
10. Site History
The District has not previously reviewed a development application for this site.
11. Capital Improvements Plan/Five Year Work Program
Victory Road is not scheduled within the District's Five Year Work Program but is identified as item
number 15 within the Capital Improvements Plan. In the Capital Improvements Plan, Victory Road is
anticipated to be a 3-lanes roadway with curb, gutter and sidewalk within 70-feet of right-of-way.
Locust Grove Road is not included within the District's Five Year Work Program or the Capital
Improvements Plan.
B. Findings for Consideration
Right-of-Way and Sidewalk
District policy requires 70-feet of right-of--way on collector roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of-
waywidth allows for the construction of a 3-lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot wide detached
sidewalks and bike lanes.
District policy 7204.8 requires 90-feet of right-of-way (45-feet from centerline) for urban section line
roads within a City's urban service programming area.
Victory Road
Victory Road is not listed as a proposed project in the District's currently adopted Five-Year Work
Program, but is in the currently adopted 20-year Capital Improvements Plan. As such, the applicant
may receive reimbursement for dedicated right-of-way from available collected impact fees.
The Board of Commissioners authorizes the expenditure of available collected impact fees for the
purchase of right-of-way dedicated by the applicant, with the applicant constructing a sidewalk as
described below. However, if funds cannot be secured, the applicant shall do one of the following:
a. Dedicate by donation (or through a development offset agreement whereby the applicant is
reimbursed from impact fees to be collected solely from the applicant's specific development project)
a total of 35-feet of right-of-way from centerline (an additional 10-feet of right-of-way) along Victory
Road, and construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victory Road, located a
minimum of 28-feet from the centerline of the right-of-way.
b. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Victory Road, located a minimum of 28-feet from the centerline of the right-of-way, in an
easement provided to the District.
c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Victory Road, located at the back edge of the existing right-of--way. Accomplish all necessary
adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities.
Locust Grove Road
Typically, right-of-way for section line roads that are located outside of a City's area of impact for
developments with lots that are less than 1-acre is 90-feet (45-feet from centerline). Due to the fact
that Locust Grove is not within the District's Capital Improvements Plan, staff is recommending that
the applicant dedicate 70-feet of right-of-way (35-feet from centerline). This would allow for 3-traffic
lanes, a bike lane, curb, gutter and sidewalk.
3
Locust Grove Road is not listed as a proposed project in the District's currently adopted Five-Year
Work Program or in the currently adopted 20-year Capital Improvements Plan. As such, the applicant
cannot receive reimbursement for dedicated right-of-way from available collected impact fees. The
applicant shall do one of the fallowing:
a. Dedicate by donation a total of 35-feet from centerline (an additional 10-feet) of right-of-way along
Locust Grove Road, and construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove
Road, located a minimum of 28-feet from the centerline of the right-of-way.
b. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Locust Grove Road, located a minimum of 28-feet from the centerline of the right-of-way, in an
easement provided to the District.
c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Locust Grove Road, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way. Accomplish all
necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities.
2. Roadway Offsets
District policy 7204.11.6, requires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 300-feet from an
arterial roadway (measured centerline to centerline).
The applicant is proposing to construct West Sagemoor Street to intersect Victory Road
approximately 185-feet west of the east property line. This roadway location meets District policy and
should be approved with this application.
The applicant is proposing to construct West Sagemoor Street to intersect Locust Grove Road
approximately 350-feet north of Victory Road. This roadway location meets District policy and should
be approved with this application.
3. Street Sections
District policy 7204.4.3 states that a developer may construct a local urban residential street with a
reduced width of 29-feet from back of curb to back of curb with curb, gutter and sidewalk. Although
some parking is allowed, the conditions for approval must be met.
• Traffic volumes on the street are not forecast to exceed 1,000 vehicle trips per day.
• There must be no possibility that the street will be extended in the near future, or that
another street may connect to it in a manner that would allow more than 1,000 vehicle
trips per day.
• The developer is required to install "no parking signs" on one side of the street, as
specified by the District.
• Vertical curbs with attached 5-foot concrete sidewalks or rolled curbs with 4-foot minimum
detached sidewalks and 5-foot minimum wide planter strips are required.
District policy 7204.4.1 states that right-of-way widths for all streets and highways shall not be less
than 50-feet wide except in unusual cases. Any request to the District to approve a street with a
right-of-way width less than 50 must prove by clear convincing evidence that the facts and
circumstances of the development warrant a finding of an exceptional case. The applicant must
show that the roadway will be used for residential purposes, there will be no possibility that the street
will be extended in the near future and the traffic volumes on the street are not forecast to exceed
200 vehicles per day.
4
District policy7240.4.3 allows a developer to construct a local urban residential street with a reduced
width of 29-feet from back-of-curb to back-of-curb with curb, gutter and sidewalk. Policy restricts
parking on reduced street sections.
The applicant is proposing to construct West Sagemoor Street as a 29-foot street section with curb,
gutter and detached 5-foot concrete sidewalk with parking on one side of the roadway within 50-feet
of right-of-way. This street section meets District policy and should be approved with this application.
The applicant is proposing to construct South Savia Place as a 29-foot street section with curb, gutter
and sidewalk within 42-feet of right-of-way. This street section meets District policy and should be
approved with this application.
4. Private Road
District policy 7207.9.3 restricts industrial driveways to a maximum width of 40-feet. Most industrial
driveways will be constructed as curb-cut type facilities if located on local streets. Curb return type
driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways.
District policy 7205.11, other jurisdictions in Ada County establish the requirements for private streets.
The District retains authority and will review the proposed intersection of a private and public street
for compliance with District intersection policies and standards.
If the City of Meridian approves the private road, the applicant shall be required to pave the private
roadway a minimum of 20 to 24-feet wide and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of
pavement of West Sagemoor Drive and install pavement tapers with 15-foot curb radii abutting the
existing roadway edge. The applicant should provide a plan showing how the private road grade
meets the public road. District Policy requires a design approach speed of 20 MPH and a maximum
intersection approach grade of 2% for at least 40-feet.
Street name and stop signs are required for the private road. The signs may be ordered through the
District. Verification of the correct, approved name of the road is required.
ACHD does not make any assurances that the private road, which is a part of this application, will be
accepted as a public road if such a request is made in the future. Substantial redesign and
reconstruction costs may be necessary in order to qualify this road for public ownership and
maintenance.
The following requirements must be met if the applicant wishes to dedicate the roadway to ACRD:
• Dedicate a minimum of 50-feet of right-of-way for the road.
• Construct the roadway to the minimum ACRD requirements.
The applicant is proposing to construct a private road, South Sagemoor Lane, to intersect West
Sagemoor Drive approximately 215-feet west of West Sagemoor Street. This private roadway
location meets District policy and should be approved with this application. In order to separate the
private road from the public right-of-way and limit cut through traffic, the applicant should terminate
the private road at the northern property line of the proposed landscape buffer. The applicant should
also install traffic bollards to minimize the connection.
5. Turnarounds
District policy 7205.2.1 requires turnarounds to be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of
45-feet. The applicant should also be required to provide a minimum of a 29-foot street section on
5
either side of any proposed center islands within the turnarounds. The medians should be
constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 100-square foot area.
The applicant is proposing to construct a cul-de-sac turnaround without a center island at the
terminus of South Savia Place. The applicant should provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet.
6. Other Access
Victory Road and Locust Grove Road are Gassified roadways. Other than the access points that are
specifically approved with this application, direct lot access to Locust Grove Road and Victory Road
are prohibited. Notes of the lot access restrictions should be noted on the final plat.
C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval
The Board of Commissioners authorizes the expenditure of available collected impact fees for the
purchase of right-of-way dedicated by the applicant, with the applicant constructing a sidewalk as
described below. However, if funds cannot be secured, the applicant shall do one of the following:
a. Dedicate by donation (or through a development offset agreement whereby the applicant is
reimbursed from impact fees to be collected solely from the applicant's specific development
project) a total of 35-feet of right-of-way from centerline (an additional 10-feet of right-of-way)
along Victory Road, and construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victory Road,
located a minimum of 28-feet from the centerline of the right-of--way.
b. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Victory Road, located a minimum of 28-feet from the centerline of the right-of-way, in an
easement provided to the District.
c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Victory Road, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way. Accomplish all
necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities.
2. The applicant shall do one of the following:
a. Dedicate by donation a total of 35-feet from centerline (an additional 10-feet) of right-of-way along
Locust Grove Road, and construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove
Road, located a minimum of 28-feet from the centerline of the right-of-way.
b. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Locust Grove Road, located a minimum of 28-feet from the centerline of the right-of-way, in
an easement provided to the District.
c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Locust Grove Road, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way. Accomplish all
necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities.
3. Construct West Sagemoor Street to intersect Victory Road approximately 185-feet west of the east
property line, as proposed.
4. Construct West Sagemoor Street to intersect Locust Grove Road approximately 350-feet north of
Victory Road, as proposed.
5. Construct West Sagemoor Street as a 29-foot street section with curb, gutter and detached 5-foot
concrete sidewalk with parking on one side of the roadway within 50-feet of right-of-way, as
proposed. Parking will be restricted on one side of the roadway and adequate signage will be
required.
6
6. Construct South Savia Place as a 29-foot street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk within 42-feet
of right-of-way, a'proposed. Parking will be restricted on one side of the roadway and adequate
signage will be required.
7. Construct a private road, South Sagemoor Lane, to intesect West Sagemoor Drive approximately
215-feet west of West Sagemoor Street. Terminate the private road at the northern property line of
the proposed landscape buffer and install traffic bollards to minimize the connection:
8. If the City of Meridian approves the private road, pave the private roadway a minimum of 20 to 24-feet
wide and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of West Sagemoor Drive and
install pavement tapers with 15-foot curb radii abutting the existing roadway edge. Provide a plan
showing how the private road grade meets the public road.
Street name and stop signs are required for the private road. Verification of the correct, approved
name of the road is required.
9. Construct a cul-de-sac turnaround without a center island at the terminus of South Savia Place.
Provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet for the turnaround.
10. Victory Road and Locust Grove Road are classified roadways. Other than the access points that are
specifically approved with this application, direct lot access to Locust Grove Road and Victory Road
are prohibited. Notes of the lot access restrictions are required on the final plat.
11. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
D. Standard Conditions of Approval
Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne
by the developer.
3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by
the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details.
5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State
of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
6. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or
other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
7. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements
of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
7
8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with
Ordinance #197, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance.
9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant
shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking
ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in
the event any ACRD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction.
10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and
signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative
of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written
confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other
regulatory and legal restrictions in farce at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises
the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a
waiveNvariance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the
time the change in use is sought.
E. Conclusions of Law
The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are
satisfied.
2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity
impacted by the proposed development.
Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Appeal Guidelines
8
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the
final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not
properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error
of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriaously in the interpretation or
enforcement of the ACRD Policy Manual.
a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged
the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs.
b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary
of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the
decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision
being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state
the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions
of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a
written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of
appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of
the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such
time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify
the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply, and any modifications to the
decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing
on the appeal.
d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal
will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held
within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's
reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal
and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the
hearing.
e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or
reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being
appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at
the hearing.
9
i~
~a
10
~ a~
~~~~ A ~
s
a~s;@~@~~4a$B$~S5 ~4~~ ;
~~~~~~~
I I I I I ®e.44e®~QB3~yu•n~
~ ~ ~'~ -a-----
~ ~~ ~ ) _ i" _
5 6tl !
~~~~~~~~~~~e~~~ -~'
~ ~ ,
~ ,~k ~ ~~ /
~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~9s~ ~
a~3 ~s~it ~tl~ ~~~tf~
9~ !a
•1
I I, ' ~t ~ Or Qi ~®i~~i ~i
i~lllll~~~~~l , ~ O' ~ ~ 9 9~ ~
FFFB~~ i ~
t µ
/.
,~ R~ °a
OH
..~ .
d
~r
~ n~@
or
ry r av w-
~ ®g ®~' ~~
M_. ~ _.
_ _ _ e
®~
® ~~ ~ ~~~
®r
=g
~} I~
B
~:l
ipF
' 1
_ '~
ri
f
i
h
€F ~
~~ I1r
~`-
c
~~
@~
~
~
a ~
~ q
tl
c ~
~ ~
e'
$~ a
¢ ~
W
4
$I~~ g
LL _~ a ~?
v gg~
~ §~ Sr
c ~6
§~
~~ ~~ ~€
~BQ~
~~ ~~ ~B
9 `~ r'~
s~ ~~ ~~r
sii
~~ *b r
~i ~~°
Q~ F. a~
~. 4~ ~~
~~ ~~ ~~~
s~~P
a ~. ~ ~
8~~~i~
a ~
~,~~
$ ~ ~
-:- ~~ ~~
y •F
! ~ A5°-
°• ia~~
_ ~F~
_ as
e~
kp
@~,~t2
~~~~~
6~~~~~$
~~~~~~~
~~~r~
€~~~~
~~~
July 31, 2003
City of Meridian
Attn: City Clerk
2235 NW 8"' Street
Meridian, ID 83642
t
RE: Sageland Planned Development
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
~'~JG - 4 2003
I will be unable to attend the August 21°` public hearing but wanted to respond to the
proposed Sageland Developmem at the comer of Victory & Locust Grove.
Although I would support the development of this piece of property, I'm apposed to the
Sageland Development as it is currently platted. In my opinion the lots are too small. I'd
like to suggest the Planning & Zoning Commission request a redraft of the plat of the
entire 10.64 acres to reduce the total # of lots on this property to under 30.
Sincerely,
Todd E. Youren
CENTRAL CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
~• DISTRICT
WEALTH Environmental Health Di,CENED Return to:
DEPARTMENT ^ BOISe
JUL 15 2003 ^ Eagle
Rezone # Ci of Meridian ^ Garden City
er ice 'Meridian
Conditional Use # ^ Kuna
Preliminary /Final /Short Plat ~P ~~ --Qom ^ ACZ
,-,
^ Star
^ 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal.
^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal.
^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal,
^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment.
^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require mare data concerning the depth of:
^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics
^ or bedrock from original grade ^ other
^ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or
surface waters.
^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and
water availability.
~8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
tral sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well
^ interim sewagecentral water
~ ^ individual sewage ^ individual water
019. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare,
~ Division of nvironmental Quality:
ntral sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water
^ sewage dry lines ~9=central water
10. Run-off is-not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
^ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
^ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State
Sewage Regulations.
^ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any:
^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas
^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store
14, Please see attached stormwater management recommendatations
^ 15.
^ child care center
Date: ~l,/~l~
Reviewed By: `+--~~`~
Review Sheet
CDHD 91001Nc
CENTRAL
~ ~ DISTRICT
~i'il`'HEALTH
DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE • 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL. • BOISE, ID 83704-0825 • (208] 3755211 • FAX 327-8500
To preven7 mrd treat disease and disabililr; fo prom ole heafrhp fifesq~les; and ro prorec( and promae the Aeallh pod yualiry~ of our en rironmenl.
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that storm water be pre-treated prior to discharge to the
subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and surface water quality. The
engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain
current best management practices for storm water disposal and design a
storm water management system that is preventing groundwater and surface
water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are:
State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best Management Practices For
Idaho Cities and Counties.
Prepared by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, July
1997.
Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook.
Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, May 2000.
^~,a.iz rt. wm
Ada 1 Boise County Office
707 N. Armstrong PI.
Boise, ID 83704
Enhro. Health: 327-7499
Family Planning: 327-7400
Immunizations: 327-74 50
Senior Nutrition: 327-7460
W1C: 327-7488
FAX: 327-85D0
Serl~ing Valley, Elmore, Boise, and Ada Counties
Elmore County Office
520 E. 8th St. North
Mountain Home, ID 83647
Enviro. Heath: 587-9225
Family Heath: 587-4407
WIC: 587-4409
FAX: 587-3521
Valley County Office
703 N. 1st St.
P.O. Box 1448
McCall, ID 83638
Ph. 634-7194
FAX: 634-2774
1~ & ~u ~~~ ~ic~iic>~
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
William Berg
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: AZ 03-015 & PP 03-020 Sageland Planned Development
Dear Will:
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
~E~~I~~D
J~1L 2 1 1003
City Cf Mericlian
City Clerk Office
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the above referenced
application for annexation and zoning.
The District does require a Land Use Application be filed for review prior to final platting
for PP 03-020. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. The District's Eight Mile
Lateral courses along the east and north boundary, This easement must be protected
and any encroachment without a signed License Agreement and approved plan, before
any construction is started, is unacceptable. All municipal surface drainage must be
retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation
District must review drainage plans. Please contact Donna Moore at 466-7861 for
further information.
The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. It is recommended that irrigation
water be made available to all developments within the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation
District.
Thank you,
D~~
Bill Henson, Asst. Water Superintendent
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
BH/dbg
cc: Water Superintendent
File -Office/Shop
Rider 4
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
15 July, 2003
~&~ CO Y
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
Brent A. Claiborn SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
Claiborn Waite Consulting, LLC ~~ ~~~T _~_ -~
1461 S. Teare Avenue v D
__Meridiarr, 1t3-83842-- -- - -- - -- - -- - - -- - -
JUL 1 11003
RE: Land Use Change Application - Sa9eland Planned Develoament
City Of Meridian
Dear Mr. Claiborn: City Clerk Office
Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation
District for its review on the above-referenced development. If this development is under a
"rush" to be finalized, I would recommend that you submit a cashier's check, money order or
cash as payment of the fees in order to speed the process up. If you submit a company or
personal check, it must clear the bank before processing the application.
Should this development be planning a pressure urban irrigation system that will be owned,
operated and maintained by the Irrigation District, I strongly urge you to coordinate with John P.
Anderson, Water Superintendent for the Irrigation District, concerning the installation of the
pressure system. Enclosed is a questionnaire that you must fill out and return in order to initiate
the process of contractual agreements between the owner or developer and the Irrigation
District for the ownership, operation and maintenance of the pressure urban irrigation system.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call on me at the District's
office, or John P. Anderson, at the District's shop.
Sincerely,
~~ ~ . ~ ~-~
Donna N. Moore, Asst. Secretary/Treasurer
NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
DNM/smc
cc: File
Water Superintendent
Will Berg, City Clerk, Meridian City
Charles H. and Vickie A. Richardson, 1835 E. Victory Road, Meridian, ID 83642
Quasar Development, LLC, 3090 Gentry Way, Meridian, ID 83642
enc.
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,D00
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
16 July 2003
Preporing
Tadoy's
Shidenb: for
Tanorrow's
SUPERINTENDENT
Christine H. Donnell
July 21, 2003
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Dear Planners:
R,ECEIV~Em
JUL 2 2 2003
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
The Meridian School District has experienced phenomenal student growth the last ten
years. The high schools, middle schools, and elementary schools throughout the district
are operating over capacity.
Approval of Saeeland Planned Development Subdivision will have a significant impact
on school enrollments at Mary McPherson Elementary, Lake Hazel Middle, and
Mountain View High School.
We can predict that these homes, when completed, will house eleven (11) elementary
aged children, ten (10) middle school aged children, and eight (8) senior high aged
students. Additional students will further compound the current overcrowded situation.
However, the developer has met with the school district and has agreed to include an
elementary and a high school site within this development.
School capacity is addressed in Idaho Code 67-6508. The Meridian School District is
currently operating beyond capacity. Future development will continue to have an impact
on the district's capacity. If you have any questions, please contact me at 888-6701.
Sincerely,
Wendel Bigham
Supervisor of Facilities and Construction
Joint School District No. 2
911 Meridian Road • Meridian, Idaho 83642 • (208) 855-4500 • Eax (208) 888-6700
AYOR
o rt D. Cowie
CIT NCIL MEMBERS
Tammy de Weerd
William L. M. Nary
Ch M Landless
',
:
CITY OF ';~tl~_
'4 ^ __
C~ri~icn Efi
tl IDAHO
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 • FAX 4GG-4405
PARKS &. RECREATION
(208) 888-3579 • Fax 898-5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 • Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297
ene c
\" wT Vim,,,, PLANNING &.ZONING
Keith Bird ~ 1909 (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-G854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by:
Transmittal Date: July 9, 2003
File No.: PP 03-02(
Request: Prelimina
in a prop)
By: Quasar D
Location of Property or
2003
Hearing Date:
Plat approval of 39
ad R-8 zone for pro
elonment. LLC
David Zaromba, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Jerry Centers, PIZ (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Michael Rohm, P/Z (No vaR, vac, FP)
Keith BolLp, P2 Mo VAR, VAC, FP)
Robert Carrie, Mayor
Bill Nary, CIC
Tammy deWeerd, CIC
Keith Bird, CIC
erie McCandless, C/C
~ater Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No VAR VAC, FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
RECEDED
JUL 1 1 2003
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
2003
lots and 9 other lots on 10.64 acres
Meridian School District (No FP)
Meridian Post Office (FPrPP Dory)
Ada County Highway Distrcl
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian brig. District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (FPiPP Dory)
U.S. West (FPiPP any)
Intermountain Gas (FP/PP OMy)
Bureau of Reclamation (FPiPPonty)
Idaho Transportation Department (No FP)
Ada County (Annexation Dory)
Ada County Land Records (FPiPP Dory)
Meridian Development Corporation
Historical
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 Human Resources Fax (208) 8848723 Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813
MAYOR
Rober[ D. Corrie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy de Weerd
William L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
~~~'
CRY OF R~~"^ '
~~ri~ian
ll ID.'.HO
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 • FAX 466-4405
PARKS & RECREATION
(208) 888-3579 • Fax 898-5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 • Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 • Faz 887-1297
PLANNING & ZONING
(208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by:
Transmittal Date: July 9, 2003
File No.: PP 03-020
2003
Hearing Date: August 21, 2003
Request: Preliminary Plat approval of 39 building lots and 9 other lots on 10.64 acres
a
By: Quasar D
Location of Property or
zone for
ant. LLC
Planned
David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Jerry Centers, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Leslie Mathes, P/Z (Na VAR, VAC, FP)
Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Keith BoNp, P2 (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Robert Come, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Cherie McCandless, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary SBNICE (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
CRy Attorney
CRy Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
Meridian School District (No FP)
Meridian Post Office (FPiPP Doty)
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irrtg. District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP Only)
U.S. West (FP/PP only)
Intermountain Gas (FP/PP only)
Bureau of ReGamation (FP/PP oMy)
IdahoTransportatiomDepartment (No FP)
Ade COUflty (Anrrexadon oMy)
Ada County Land Records (FP/PP only)
Meridian Development Corporation
Historical Preservation Commission
RECEIVED
JUL 1 52003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433
ice Fax (208) 888-4218 Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813
MAYOR ~- I,MEF
ROBERT D. CORD KEN W. BO0.'ERS
COUNCIL. MEMBERS DEPUTY CHIEF - FIRE. PRF,VFNTIIIV
WILLIAM L.M. NARY JOSEPH SILVA
KEITH BIRD
TAMMY DE WEERD
CHERIE MCCANDLESS CITY OF ~
`~
1
~ DEPUTY CHI EF-TRAINING
BILL JOHNSON
RURAL FIRE COMMISSIONERS /~~///~
r/~
"" ""'"`-"~ ty S40 Easl Franklin Rnad
RICHARD GRBBNE ~. ^1AFi C) />~
~ ~~ Meridian, ]D 83642
TERRY LEIGHTON
r
~ (2O8) $$$-1234
SrevEELUOTT ~'~"=?~~k,Mgyuv="`'` ~~a Fax (208)895-0390
MERIDIAN CITY/RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT
August 11, 2003 A~ I ~ 2~~3
CITY Q~ MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK nFFICF
T0: Mayor, City Council and the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Joseph Silva, Deputy Chief, Fire Prevention
SUBJECT: Sageland Subdivision AZ 03-01 S, CUP 03-036, PP 03-020
The following will be the requirements and/or concerns to provide minimum levels of fire
protection for the proposed project:
The project which comprised of single family dwellings will require afire-flow of 1,000
gallons per minute available for duration of 2 hours to service the entire project. Fire
hydrants shall be placed an average of 400' apart. 1997 UFC Appendix III-A
2. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian
Water Department.
3. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire
Department. The proposed fire hydrant locations will be submitted to the Public
Works for plan review.
4. All roads and fire lanes shall have a taming radius of 28' inside and 48' outside.
5. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required before
combustible construction begins. UFC 901.4.2 & 901.3
6. The proposed 39-lot subdivision with an estimated 2.9 residents per household would
have a total estimated population of 113residents at build out. According to a report
completed by Fire & Emergency Services Consulting Group in February of 2000 our
requests for service are projected to reach 2800 in the year 2005 and 3800 by the year
2010, this is up from 2069 responses in the year 2000.
The proposed project lies outside the five-minute response zone goal. Achievement
of this goal is subject to budgetary constraints and is .intended to enhance the
probability of a favorable outcome on a request for Basic Life Support. The budget
constraints are typically defined as capital outlay for facilities that are located within
1.5 miles from a given location and sufficient operational funds to staff the facilities.