HomeMy WebLinkAboutSageland PD CUP 03-036August 18, 2003
MERIDIAN PLANNING 8. ZONING MEETING
APPLICANT Quasar Development, LLC
REQUEST Public Hearing -Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development with
a private neighborhood park in an R-8 zone for proposed Sageland Planned Development -
northeast comer of South Locust Grove Road and East Victory Road
AGENCY COUNTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
SEL CLl"'IO.Ch9 'G~, C'OfYI(Y~L.Yt1.o
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY p
CITY POLICE DEPT: ~
CITY FIRE DEPT: See attached COmmenfs ~,
CITY BUILDING DEPT: O ~
vd
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT
CITY PARKS DEPT: See attached Comments
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: See attached Comments
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER: S attached IeRer from Todd Youren -~- V-~- ~~"'"` M6~
Contacted: ~ 1 D/ate: ~ Phone:
Emailed: .~ C, Gj.1YWo.~.lr.: 111701 _-Staff Initials:
Maferlals presented at parblic m logs shall become properly of the of eridia~
CUP 03-036
August 21, 2003
ITEM NO. ~ 5
v 1;-r~
-7070 c~~
i
08/21/2009
05 FA% 2088888854 MERIDIAN P&Z DEPT
?tend Residential Planned Development
9i6onal Use Permit Application
of Meridian
1 of 2
Supplemental CUP Application Narrative
P ~ZC~wt,l~ .
g-21-3
~~~~.rs
A. Architectural Style And Building Design
Sageland will include a vanety of smgle and two story home designs in the Craftsman
Tradition style. Garages will be minimized and home fronts and porches will be maximized.
Please refer to the enclosed 8.5'x11' colored photographs showing the various home
designs and styles for Sageland. The home designs in Sageland wiU skso allow detached
garages, side entry garages and shared driveways to enhance the StreetscaPe and provide
a neo-traditional architectural feel to the community. See information below:
.side EnUy Garage Design Norttes in geland
i Specific l.nt Front of Home Srde Ertnv Garage
yq~ Fac¢ tNilrFace
Lot 28'13fock 2 East or NE North
Lot 24 Block 2 . West Nortfi
Lot 3TBfock 2 East Nodh
Lof 39 Block 2 West North
Lot 46 Stock 2 East North
R,E(~EIVE
AUG 2 1 2003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Possible Shared Drttreway Homes in SaAPdand
SpecBic Lots
Lots 37 and 38 Block 2 Location of Garage
Possible RearYatd
Lots 38 and 39 Block 2 _ Passible RearYard
Lots 46 and 47 Block 2 Possible Rear Yard
Lots 16 and 17 Block ~ PossiNe;RearYand
Lots 17 and T8 Blodt 1
Lots 2 through S and Lots 11 through 15
of Stack 1 are Possible Candidates Possible RearYard
Side Yard.or Possible
ReerYards
B Building Materials And Color
Sageland will include a variety of traditiona! exterior building materials inducting hardboartl
siding, exposed and painted wootl, shingles, shakes, clapboard, brick, stone, masonry ana
stucco. Interior building Materials will be traditional and comply with Meridian building
codes. Sageland will adopt a color scheme for the exterior tnsabnents using both bold and
subdued natural colors in keeping with the overall theme of "Traditional Craftsman" style.
?tease refer to iri: enclosed 8.5'x11' colored prietographs showing the various home
designs and styles for Sageland.
C. Landscaping
Sageland Hnlf include a variety of traditional landscape matedaLs that are proven in
Meridian's climate. The landscape theme of Sageland is centered on various species of
sage and sage related plants. Please refer to the enclosed landscape plan for Sageland.
1116
20888(36854 PRGE.01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
DATE August 21, 2003 ITEM # 15
PROJECT NUMBER CUP 03-036
PROJECT NAME Sageland Planned Development
NAME (PLEASE PRINT) FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL
C ~J~-,~ s , ~~~- X
HIJB OF TREASURE VALLEY
MAYOR A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT
Robert D. Come
CITY OF MERIDIAN (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC WGRxs
Tamm
deWeerd 33 EAST 1DAl-IO BUILDING DEPARTM ENT
y (208)898-SSOO~Fax 887-1297
Ketch Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Cherie McCandless (208) 888-4433 ~ FAX (208) 8874813 PLANNING AND ZONING
William L
M
Nary City Clerk Office Fax (208) 8884218 DEPARTMENT
.
. (208) 884-5533 ~ FAX 888-6854
STAFF REPORT: Hearing Date: August 21, 2003
To: Mayor, City Council and Plannirngl & Zoning Commission ~~~1 Y jJD
From: Wendy Kirkpatrick, Planner II W~- ~ ~O~j t 8 2~3
Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech Cl~1f OF MERIDIAN
Re: Sageland Subdivision ~I~ ~~-E~K o~~f;F
• Annexation and Zoning of 9.8 Acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-8 (Medium
Density Residential District), by Quasar Development, LLC (File No. AZ-03-
I S).
• Preliminary Plat Approval of Thirty-nine (39) Building Lots and Nine (9)
Other Lots on 9.8 Acres in a Proposed R-8 Zone, by Quasar Development,
LLC (File No. PP-03-020).
• Conditional Use Permit Approval for a Planned Development Consisting of
_s. Thirty-nine (39) Single-family Detached Lots, One private "Neighborhood"
Park and Eight (8) Common Lots on 9.8 Acres in a Proposed R-8 Zone. The
Proposed Planned Development Includes a Request to Allow Reduced Lot
Sizes, Reduced Frontage Requirements and Reduced Setbacks, by Quasar
Development, LLC (File No. CUP-03-036).
We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as
conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Councll:
APPLICATION SUMMARY
The applicant, Quasar Development, LLC, has applied for the Annexation and Zoning,
Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit approval of a Planned Development consisting of
39 buildable lots and 9 other lots on 9.8 acres of land located at the northeast intersection of S.
Locust Grove Road and W. Victory Road. The land is presently zoned RUT, and the applicants
have requested that upon annexation, all of the property be zoned R-8.
The applicant's preliminary plat approval request is for 39 building lots and 9 other lots. The
"other" lots include a half acre park, five open space/ landscaping lots, two micro-path lots,
AZ-03A 13, PP-03-W 0, CUP-03-036 Sagelavd Subdivision. AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 2
and one private road lot. The proposed residential lot sizes range from the proposed minimum
lot size of 5,000 square feet up to 7,958 square feet. The gross density of the proposed
subdivision is 3.97 dwelling units per acre and the net density of the subdivision is 4.43
dwelling units per acre. The project is a single phase development.
The Planned Development application includes requests to allow reduced development standards
including reduced setbacks, reduced lot size and reduced frontages. The applicant is not able to
ask for a deviation from Private Street standards through the Planned Development application.
The' applicant will be required to submit a revised street plan showing that the proposed Private
Street meets the Private Street standards found in the MCC. The following is a comparison of
the City's minimum requirements and the reduced requirements that have been proposed by the
applicant:
Setbacks- City Reauirements (R-8) Proposed Setbacks (single family)
Front: 15' living area, 20' garage Front: 15' for non-front entry garage,
20' for front entry garage
Rear: 15' Rear: 15'
Interior Side: 5' Interior Side: 5'
Lot Size- City Reauirements (R-8)
6,500 sq.ft. (detached)
Proposed Lot Sizes
5,000 sq.ft. (detached)
Lot Frontage- City Requirements (R-8)
65'minimum (detached)
Proposed Frontage
20' minimum (detached)
The applicant has proposed the following amenities to fulfill the requirement of the Planned
Development Ordinance to provide at least two amenities: 1.008 acres of common area (10.3%
of gross land area) and atwenty-foot-wide multiple use pathway along the Eight Mile Lateral.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed applications with conditions of approval.
The legal description submitted with the application appears to meet the requirements of the City
of Meridian and State Tax Commission and places the parcel contiguous to existing city limits.
The subject property is within the Urban Service Planning Area and essential City services are or
can be made available to the subject property.
CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD
Charles H. and Vickie A. Richardson are the current property owners and they have submitted an
affidavit of legal interest to allow Quasar Development to apply for the three subject applications.
AZ-03-015, PP-03-020, CUP-03-036 SageUvd Subdivuiov AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 3
LOCATION
The property is located at the northeast intersection of 5. Locust Grove Road and W. Victory
Road.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North: Sherbrooke Hollows Subdivision (Single-family residential), zoned R-4.
South: Rural residential, zoned RUT (Ada County).
East: Sherbrooke Hollows Subdivision (Single-family residential), zoned R-4.
West: Rachina Estates, (Single-family residential), zoned RUT (Ada County).
ANNEXATION & ZONING ANALYSIS
According to Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, both
the P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review ,the particular facts and
circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall
find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning
amendment. "
The following is the list of standards found in 11-15-11 and analysis by staff:
A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
Staff finds that the requested zoning designation, R-8, is harmonious with and in
accordance with the effective Comprehensive Plan (`02) and the Future Land Use
Map, which designates the land to be "Medium Density Residential. "
The Comprehensive Plan also indicates that the subject property should have a
"Multi Use" pathway running along the northern and eastern edges of the subject
property along the Eight Mile Lateral. Page 54 of the Comprehensive plan
addresses the issue of pathways and states that they should be in compliance with
the Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan (not yet adopted) and that the
pathway should be located "off street".
The applicant has indicated that they will construct a 10' asphalt multi-use
pathway with five feet of gravel on both sides of the pathway along the Eight Mile
Lateral.
AZ-03-015, PP-03020, CUP-03-036 Sageland Subdivision AZ.PP.CCP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 4
B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the
future;
The applicant has not indicated that they anticipate rezoning the subject property in
the future.
C. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the
fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning -for example, a
residential area turning into a commercial area by means of conditional use
permits;
Staff finds that the proposed single family residential subdivision would be
allowed within the requested R-8 zone, if accompanied with a Conditional Use
Permit for a Planned Development
D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed
in a fashion siruilar to the proposed rezone area;
Staff finds that the land to the north and east of the subject property has been
developed as residential subdivisions similar to the proposed subdivision. Staff
finds that the requested zoning designation of R-8 is harmonious with the adjacent
developments to the north and east of the subject property and should be rezoned
as requested. While the applicant has applied for an R-8 zoning designation, the
subject property is actually being developed at a density of four dwelling units per
acre.
E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the
essential character of the same area;
Staff finds that the proposed use (single family residential) will not change the
existing (single family residential and rural residential) or intended character
(medium density single family residential) of the area.
F. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
The Commission and Council should rely on public testimony (oral and written) to
determine whether or not the proposed uses will be disturbing or hazardous to the
existing or future neighboring uses.
Staff does not anticipate that the proposed residential uses will be hazardous or
disturbing to future or existing neighbors.
AZ03-015, PP-03-020, CUP-03-036 Sagelvid Subdivuian AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 5
G. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the
establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of such services;
Staff finds that the property to be annexed will or can be served adequately by all
essential public facilities and services. Applicant shall be required to extend water
and sanitary sewer mains to and through the proposed development, thereby
making them available to the adjacent properties. The Fire Department has made
the following recommendations:
Prohibit parking on the proposed Sagemoor Lane and paint curbs of Sagemoor
Lane red. Provide Fire Department access to the South end of Sagemoor Lane via
a swing gate.
Meridian's Planned Development Ordinance requires private streets over 200' in
length to be 42' in width. The applicant will be required to revise the proposed
private street so that the street meets private street standards.
Please review ACHD and Fire Department comments concerning this subdivision
for further information regarding public services and facilities
H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community;
Staff finds that there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost
for public services and facilities and that the annexation and zoning will not be
detrimental to the community's economic welfare. The applicant will be
responsible for extending water and sewer facilities to the subject property and for
constructing all roads within the proposed subdivision.
I. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
Staff finds that the proposed subdivision will not create excessive traffic, noise or
other nuisances that would be detrimental to the general welfare of the surrounding
area.
AZ-03-015, PP-03-020, CUP-03-036 Sagdavd Subdiviswn AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 6
Staff recognizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase upon build-out of the
proposed subdivision; however staff does not feel that the amount generated will
be detrimental to the public welfare of the city.
J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Staff finds that the subdivision's vehiculaz approaches off Victory Road and
Locust Grove Road will not cause significant interference on the surrounding
public streets.
Please review ACRD comments concerning vehiculaz approaches and traffic
generation. ACHD recommends approval of the proposed subdivision as
submitted.
K. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature
of major importance; and
The subject property is presently being used as pasture land. One single family
dwelling and several outbuildings are located on the subject property. The
proposed subdivision will not result in the loss or damage of scenic or natural
features significant importance. Any existing trees larger than 4" caliper that are
removed shall be mitigated for, per the Landscape Ordinance.
L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best, interest of the City of
Meridian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)?
Staff finds services are available to the site and that the inclusion of a pathway
that will become a part of Meridian's pathway system makes the annexation of
this property in the best interest of the City.
ANEXATION AND 7,ONING CONDTIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services
are available from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes
such as landscape irrigation.
2. A Development Agreement shall be required, the following shall be addressed in the
Development Agreement: pathway standards and fencing requirements for the Pathway and
micropaths.
PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS AND REQUIREMENTS
AZ-03-015, PP-03-02~, CUP-03-036 Sagelavd Subdivision AZ.PP.COP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 7
Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed
subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objecfives of this title and at least the
following:
a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan;
Staff finds the subdivision to be in confonnance with the Comprehensive Plan. As
mentioned elsewhere in the staff report, the proposed subdivision meets goals of the
Comprehensive Plan through the following: providing a pathway which will become a
part of Meridian's pathway system, providing a pazk, and through the addition of a variety
of housing types to Meridian's housing inventory.
b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development;
Staff finds that public services are available to accommodate the proposed development.
The proposed subdivision is served by an existing network of streets and water and sewer
mains are located within close proximity to the subject property. The developers of the
Tuscany Village Subdivision, located at the southwest corner of Victory Road and Locust
Grove Road, have proposed to extend the Ten Mile trunk line through their proposed
subdivision, rather than following Meridian's Public Works master plan which shows the
Ten Mile Trunk route following Victory Road and Locust Grove. If Council approves this
alternate route for the Ten Mile Trunk, sewer will not be readily accessible to the
developers of the Sageland Subdivision, and a substantial amount of off-site main would
have to be installed by this developer.
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement
program;
Staff finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement
funds; the developer will pay for the development of roads within the proposed
subdivision and for the extension of city services to the proposed development.
d. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
Staff finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing
supporting services; the developer will pay for the extension of urban services to the
subject property and for roads within the subdivision. If Council approves the alternate
routing of the Ten Mile trrnk through the Tuscany Village subdivision sewer will not be
located within close proximity of Sageland Subdivision.
e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the
Commission's attention.
AZ-03-0]5, PP-03-020, CUP~03~036 Sageland Subdivision AZ PP.CIIP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 8
Staff ftnds that there should not be any other health, safety or environmental problems
associated with this subdivision that may be brought to the Council or Commission's
attention.
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Private Street The applicant is proposing a 250' long and 29' wide Private Road (Sagemoor
Lane). Meridian's Planned Development Ordinance requires Private Streets over 200' in length to
be 42' in width. Meridian's Planned Development Ordinance does not allow for deviations from
Private Street standards. The applicant will be required to revise the site plan to depict a Private
Road which is 42' in width or 200' in length prior to the City Council hearing. Meridian's Fire
Department approves of the proposed Private Road configuration with the addition of a swing
gate at the south end of Sagemoor Lane and the prohibition of parking on Sagemoor Lane.
Reduced Lot Requirements: The lot dimensions within the proposed subdivision are less than
those required by the current Zoning Ordinance and would not be permitted without the
applicant's request for a Planned Development. Shared driveways have been proposed for a
number of the proposed lots which do not meet the dimensional standazds for the R-8 district.
The proposed shared driveways have allowed the applicant to build detached single family
homes on the smaller proposed lots located on the northern side of the proposed W. Sagemoor
Drive. Staff does not object to the requested reduced dimensions of the lots.
Shared Driveways: The applicant is proposing shared driveways at the following locations:
Lots 37 and 38, Block 2
Lots 38 and 39, Block 2
Lots 46 and 47, Block 2
Lots 16 and 17, Block 1
Lots 17 and 18, Block 1
Lots 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12,13,14,and 15, Block 1
Staff supports the use of shared driveways in the proposed subdivision. The developer's subject
property has a number of constraints including: the relatively small size of the subject property,
existing structures on the subject property and trees that the developer is attempting to preserve.
The shazed driveways are an innovative way to deal with site constraints.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS /PRELIMINARY PLAT
Sanitary sewer and water service to this site shall be via main line extensions from
existing mains in the area. Applicant will be responsible for constructing the sewer and
water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to
coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department
AZ-03-0I5, PP-03-020, CUP-03-036 Sagelmd Subdivision AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 9
The developers of the Tuscany Village Subdivision, located at the southwest comer of
Victory Road and Locust Grove Road, have proposed to extend the Ten Mile trunk line
through their proposed subdivision, rather than following Meridian's Public Works master
plan which shows the Ten Mile Trunk route following Victory Road and Locust Grove. If
the Meridian City Council approves this alternate route for the Ten Mile Trunk at their
September 9`" meeting, sewer will not be readily accessible to the developers of the
Sageland Subdivision, and a substantial amount of off-site main would have to be installed
by this developer.
2. A permanent pedestrian easement, in favor of the City of Meridian, shall be recorded for
the pedestrian pathway prior to the final plat being recorded. The inshvment number for
the easement shall be referenced on the final plat. The easement shall be sufficient width
to cover the 20-foot wide pathway shown. The 10-foot wide hard surfaced pathway shall
be constructed and fully improved prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy for any building within the subdivision. Additionally, a note shall be added to
the face of the fmal plat indicating the City of Meridian is responsible for the maintenance
of the pathway surface located within the easement. The note shall also indicate who will
be responsible for landscaping maintenance within the easement.
3. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on
site. The applicant has indicated that the pressurized irrigation system within this
development is to be connected to an existing Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
system. If a single-point backup connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible
for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat
by the Meridian City Engineer.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted with the final plat application. The detailed
landscape plan shall include a 6' wrought iron fence along the western and southern edges
of the proposed neighborhood park to make it more difficult for children using the
neighborhood park to come into contact with traffic on Locust Grove Road and Victory
Road.
5. Revise the proposed Private Street to meet the Private Street standards of Meridian's
Planned Development ordinance.
6. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H.
7. Please submit up-to-date groundwater monitoring report to the Public Works Department
for review. The report submitted with the application only identifies the groundwater
elevation on the day the test holes were dug in April. The initial study indicates that
shallow groundwater may be a factor. All drainage areas (detention/retentionbasfns) must
be designed to ensure that water is retained only during 100-year storm events, and for a
period of time not to exceed 24 hours. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed
3:1. The project engineer should pay close attention to the results of field studies
determining the groundwater, soil type & and characteristics during the design and
construction phases. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline
AZ-03-0I5, PP-03-020, COP-03-03fi Sagelevd Subdivision AZ.PPCOP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 10
elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established normal groundwater
elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at
least 1-foot above groundwater.
8. Sidewalks shall be installed within the subdivision and on the perimeter of the subdivision
pursuant to MCC 12-13-10-8.
9. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
10. Add or revise the following preliminary plat notes:
•Add a note to the face of the plat that requires any re-subdivision of this plat to be in
compliance with the most recently approved subdivision standards of the City of
Meridian.
•Add a note to the face of the plat stating that no sight-obscuring fence shall be taller than
four feet in height.
11. Ten (10) copies of a revised plat shall be submitted to the City Clerk's Office at least ten
days prior to the next public hearing for this plat.
GENERAL COMMENTS
1. Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's approval letter for the
subdivision name, and the lot and block numbering. Make any corrections necessary to
conform.
2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
3. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing,
landscaping, play equipment, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to
signature on the final plat.
4. All micro-paths within the proposed subdivision shall be designed in accordance with
MCC 12-13-15 "Micropath Landscaping".
5. A detailed landscape plan, in compliance with the landscape ordinance shall be submitted
for the subdivision with the final plat application.
6. Sidewalks within the proposed subdivision shall be built in accordance with MCC12-13-
10-8.
7. 250 and 100-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locafions
designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at
subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
AZ03-0]5, PP-03-020, CLIP-03-036 Sagelavd Subdivisiov AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 11
Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by
Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the
Public Works Department prior commencing installations.
8. The subject property has a number of mature trees. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is
removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the
equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed. Required landscaping
trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to be removed.
9. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
10. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells
may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
11. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all
building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
12. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that
all street finish centerline elevations aze set a minimum of three feet above the highest
established normal groundwater elevation.
STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USES
The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each
proposed conditional use in terms of the following and may approve a conditional use permit if
they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11-17-3):
A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open
spaces, parking landscaping and other features as may be required by this
ordinance;
Staff finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the requested use and
all required yards, open spaces and other features required by this ordinance.
B. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance;
The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the property as "Medium
Density Residential. Staff finds that the proposed residential uses aze harmonious with and
in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.
The project is being proposed as a conditional use for a planned development in order to
allow reduced lot sizes, reduced street frontages, and reduced setbacks. If the project is
approved as a Planned Development, with a Variance from Private Road dimensional
standards, it will meet the minimum requirements of the MCC.
AZ-03-015. PP-03-020, C[1P-03-036 Sagelavd Sabdivuivv AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 12
C. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible with
other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of
the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential
character of the same area;
Staff finds that the proposed residential subdivision use will be harmonious with the
intended and existing character of the area. Property to the north and east of the subject
property has been developed as asingle-family residential subdivision with an R-4 zoning
designation. Property to the south and west of the subject property is designated as RUT
(Ada County) and is designated as Low Density Residential (to the west of the subject
property) and Medium Density Residential (to the south of the subject property.)
D. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will
not adversely affect other property in the vicinity;
Staff does not anticipate that the proposed project will have an adverse impact on other
properties within the vicinity; however, the Commission and Council should consider any
testimony (written and oral) presented at the public hearings before making this finding.
E. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of
proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services;
Staff finds that the proposed development will be adequately served by the essential public
facilities and services listed above. The applicant will extend sewer and water to the
subject property and the proposed subdivision will be served by an existing roadway
network and City of Meridian police and fire protection.
F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost
for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare
of the community;
Staff finds that the proposed use would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the
community, nor would it create the need for any new facilities or services to be paid for by
the public that would be considered excessive. The developer will pay for the extension
of existing sewer and water lines to the proposed development and for roads within the
subdivision.
G. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment,
and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or
general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes,
glare or odors;
AZA3-015. PP-03A2g, CUP-03-036 Sagelavd Subdivuiov AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 13
Staff finds that there will be an increase in traffic and noise in the general vicinity if the
subdivision is approved, but that approval of the subdivision will not lead to a major
increase in smoke, fumes, glaze, odors or other disturbances that will be considered
detrimental to the welfare of the City and the subdivision's neighbors.
H. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be
so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Staff finds that the proposed use will not create significant interference with any traffic on
the surrounding public streets.
Please review the ACHD report for this project for additional information regarding this
finding. ACHD has recommended approval of the proposed subdivision as submitted.
L That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural,
scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
Staff does not find that any natural or scenic feature will be lost, damaged or destroyed by
issuance of this conditional use. Existing trees greater than 4" caliper must be retained or
mitigated for, if removed.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS (Conditional Use Permitl
Applicant shall meet all of the requirements of the preliminary plat as a condition of the
Conditional Use Permit.
2. All development shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair
Housing Act.
The reductions to the frontage and minimum lot sizes are approved as submitted.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
Chapter VI, Goal III, Objective A, Action 3:
Provide a variety of park types (neighborhood parks, regional parks) interspersed
throughout the community.
The development's proposed half-acre park meets the intent of this Comprehensive Plan Action
Chapter VII, Goal V, Objective A, Action 4:
Provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes and
multi-family arrangements) and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all
income groups in a variety of location suitable for residential development.
AZ03-0I5, PP-03-020, CUP-03-036 Sagelaud Subdivision AZ.PP.CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003
Page 14
The proposed single-family homes with their diversity of building styles,. building materials, and
side-entry garages meet the intent of this Comprehensive Plan Action. The proposed single-
familyhomes will help to diversify the types of housing available in Meridian by providing
additional housing choices.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation/rezone, preliminary plat, and conditional
use permit with the aforementioned findings and conditions. If the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends that the applicant makes substantial changes to the application staff
recommends that the hearing be continued to allow staff and the Planning and Zoning
Commission additional time to review changes made to the application.
AZ-03-015. PP-03-020,CUP~03-036 Sagelavd Subdivuiov AZ.PP.COP
I~,~~FIVED
&JG - q 2003
July 31, 2003
City of Meridian
Attn: City Clerk
2235 NW 8~° Street
Meridian, ID 83642 a
RE: Sageland Planned Development
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
I will be unable to attend the August 21~` public hearing but wanted to respond to the
proposed Sageland Development at the comer of Victory & Locust Grove.
Ahhough I would support the development of this piece of property, I'm apposed to the
Sageland Development as it is currently platted. In my opinion the lots are too small. I'd
like to suggest the Planning & Zoning Commission request a redraft of the plat of the
entire 10.64 acres to reduce the total # of lots on this property to under 30,
Sincerely,
Todd E. Youren
,. ;~.,
' ~,~a~ ~ LEGAL DEPARTM ENT
MAYOR -~,;r. (208) 466-9272 • FAX 4GG-4405
Rober[ D. Cortie ~rv of f °J~'~
c
_
/
'f PARKS & RECREATION
_
~
/
/~~~
+ - ~f \ (2081 888-3579 • Fax 898-SSOI
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS 1
y
ji
J
/
/
/
J
\
~
~~~ ~ PUBLIC WORKS
Tammy de Weerd `/ 7 f• //
f
/L
ID.~HO 1~ (208) 898-5500 • Fax 887-1297
William L. M. Nary y /% BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Cherie McCandless PCB. ^~ (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297
Keith Bird "` ~ nensunc • "'~ '~ °1NLE PLANNING & ZONING
1907 (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by:
LLC
Transmittal Date: July 14, 2003 Hearing Date: August 21, 2003
File No.: CUP 03-036
Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development with a private neighbor-
By:
Location
2003
corner
David Zaremba, P!Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Jerry Centers, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Leslie Mathes, P!Z (No vAR, vac, FP),
Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Keith Borup, P!Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Robert Corrie, Mayor
Bill Nary, C!C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Chede McCandless, CIC
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
+~ Parks Department
Meridian School District (No FP)
Meridian Post Office (FP/PP oNy)
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irdg. District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power CO. (FP/PP only)
U.S. West (FP/PP ~~ty)
Intermountain Gas (FP/PP oMy)
Bureau of Reclamation (FPiPP Doty)
Idaho Transportation Department (No FP)
Ada County (Annexation oMy)
Ada County Land Reconis (FP/PP Doty)
Meridian Development Corporation
RECEI~rED
lur_ z z 2ooa
Cfty of Meridian
City Clerk Office
hood parkin an R-8 zone for the proposed Sageland Planned Development
or
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813
Historical Preservation Commission
Your Concise Remarks:
9
MAYOR
Robert D. Cortie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy de Weerd
William L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
.r
~-'
ctrv of "~~~' ~ ~_ s,
---._
C~ri~icn`
11 IDAHO
2003
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: August 1
Transmittal Date: Juty 14, 2003
File No.: CUP 03-036
Request: Conditional Use Permit for a
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 4G6-9272 • FAX 4G6-4405
PARKS & RECREATION
(208) 888-3579 • Fax 898-5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 • Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(20B) 887.2211 • Fax 887-1297
PLANNING & ZONING
(206) 884-5533 • Fax 888-G854
Hearing Date: August 21, 2003
with a
hood parkin an R-8 zone for the
By: Quasar Development, LLC
Location of Property or Projed: northeast com
Grove
David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, vac, FP)
Jeny Centers, P2 (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, vac, FP)
Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, vac, FP)
Keith Bonlp, P!Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Robert Come, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Cherie McCandless, C/C
,~ Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
city Attorney Your Concise
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
Meridian School Distrid (No FP)
Meridian Post Office (FPrPP Drily)
Ada County Highway Distrid
Ada County Development Services
Central Distrid Health
Nampa Meridian brig. Distrid
Settlers Irrigation Distrid
Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP Dory)
U.S. West (FP/PP ~~ty)
Intermountain Gas (FPiPP ~~ty)
Bureau of Redamation (FPA'P Doty)
Idaho Transportation Department (No FP)
Ada County (Annexation only)
Ada County Land Reconis (FP/PP Dory)
Meridian Development Corporation
IVED
JUL 2 1 2003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813
g,ECENEL~
AUG - 5 2003
Citq of Merid i ~n
pp y~~~ CityClerknt?t?ics
~i i~/W ~ ~ "/~pzL~ L/Ld~'LGC~
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
William Berg
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho Ave.
_Meridian, ID &3Fi42 _ -- -
RE: CUP 03-036 Sageland Planned Development
Dear Will:
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires a Land Use Change Application be filed for
review prior to final platting.
All laterals and waste ways must be protected. The District's Eight Mile Lateral course
along the north and east boundaries. This easement must be protected and any
encroachment without a signed License Agreement and approved plan, before any
construction is started, is unacceptable.
All municipal surface drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves
the site, the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. Please
contact Donna Moore at 486-7861 for further information.
The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. It is recommended that irrigation
water be made available to all developments within the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation
District.
Thank you,
~~ ~
Bill Henson '
Asst. Water Superintendent
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
BHldbg
cc: Water Superintendent
Claibom Waite Consulting
File -Office/Shop ,
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
25 July, 2003
RECEIVED
AUG - 5 2003
City of Meridian CU i T
City Clerk Office Y
& 712'extdi~ ~I .
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83551-4395
FAX # 206-463-0092
Phones: Area Code 208
Claiborn Waite Consulting
1461 S. Teare Avenue
Meridian, ID 83642
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
RE: --tandTlse 6hange-Application -Sa~e4and Rlannaa~A.ett er~ment- - ___-
To Whom It May Concern:
Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation
District for its review on the above-referenced development. If this development is under a
"rush" to be finalized, I would recommend that you submit a cashier's check, money order or
cash as payment of the fees in order to speed the process up. If you submit a company or
personal check, it must clear the bank before processing the application.
Should this development be planning a pressure urban irrigation system that will be owned,
operated and maintained by the Irrigation District, I strongly urge you to coordinate with John P.
Anderson, Water Superintendent for the Irrigation District, concerning the installation of the
pressure system. Enclosed is a questionnaire that you must fill out and return in order to initiate
the process of contractual agreements between the owner or developer and the Irrigation
District for the ownership, operation and maintenance of the pressure larban irrigation system.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call on me at the District's
office, or John P. Anderson, at the District's shop.
Sincerely,
Donna N. Moore, Asst. Secretary/Treasurer
NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
DNM/smc
cc: File
Water Superintendent
Will Berg, City Clerk, Meridian City
Quasar Development, LLC 3090 Gentry Way, Meridian, ID 83642
Charles H. and Vickie A. Richardson, 1835 E. Victory Road, Meridian, ID 83642
enc.
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS ~ 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS ~ 40,000
31 July 2003
MAYOR 1:191EF
ROBERT D. CORRIE KEN W. BOWERS
COUNCIL MEMBERS '~ DEPUTY CFREF - FIRE PRF,VENTION
WILLIAM L.M. NARY ~.rt
~ JOSEPH SILV A
KEITH BIRD ~
~ DEPOTY CHIEF - TRAINI:JG
TAMMY DE WEERD
RIE MCCANDLESS
C c~TV OF _--
-
~~r
~~e
C~' ~"4,~ BILL JOHNSON
HE ~
n
>
- -
~
540 East Franklin Roat9
RIIRAL FIRE CDMMISSIDNERS It>nra<~
~ ~ ]D 33(142
Meridian
RICHARD GRHENE ~
~
~
~ ,
(208} 888-1234
TERRY LEIG IiTON ~
FN ,
~,.,~.~,rr v-N'%~
w.~.~,a,?,n~ Fas (?08) 895-0390
STEVE ELLIOTT , '~ 9eJa
MERIDIAN CITY/RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT
AUG 1 12003
August 11, 2003
CITY QF MERIDIAN.
CITY CLERK OFFICE
T0: Mayor, City Council and the Meridian Plamiing & Zoning Commission
FROM: Joseph Silva, Deputy Chief, Fire Prevention
SUBJECT: Sageland Subdivision AZ 03-015, CUP 03-036, PP 03-020
The following will be the requirements and/or concerns to provide minimum levels of fire
protection for the proposed project:
1. The project which comprised of single family dwellings will require afire-flow of 1,000
gallons per minute available for duration of 2 hours to service the entire project. Fire
hydrants shall be placed an average of 400' apart. 1997 LJFC Appendix III-A
2. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian
Water Department.
3. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire
Department. The proposed fire hydrant locations will be submitted to the Public
Works for plan review.
4. All roads and fire lanes shall have a fuming radius of 28' inside and 48' outside.
5. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required before
combustible construction begins. LTFC 901.4.2 & 901.3
6. The proposed 39-lot subdivision with an estimated 2.9 residents per household would
have a total estimated population of 113residents at build out. According to a report
completed by Fire & Emergency Services Consulting Group in Febmary of 2000 our
requests for service aze projected to reach 2800 in the year 2005 and 3800 by the year
201 Q this is up from 2069 responses in the year 2000.
The proposed project lies outside the five-minute response zone goal. Achievement
of this goal is subject to budgetary constraints and is intended to enhance the
probability of a favorable outcome on a request for Basic Life Support. The budget
constraints are typically defined as capital outlay for facilities that are located within
1.5 miles from a given location and sufficient operational funds to staff the facilities.
tCJ~ n~-~~ f~-~-~-1 J ~V~,`(~..-i SS ~ ara.SS
c~~ ~' "` ~~`~ Vin ENv~c ~ ~ ~ ~^~S~
c~ ~~Sk Z~s~ ~ 2~a3
~~ ~ v~~ ~~
~~~ ~
tic. t ( ox
'~~~ 3
II
~(V~,.~ 5~,~..~ l~-
~~~~
Q~~ 3
lv ~ goo N
F~'0~~~~ ~F ~~
G~~~ G~~a
G~~
TUSCANY DEVELOPMENT, INC
P.O. Boas 344, Meridian, ID 83680
(208) 888-9946 (208) 888-9947 FAX
August 15, 2003
RECEIVED
Brad Watson, P.E.
Meridian City Engineer
660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 200
Meridian, ID 83642
Re: Tuscany Village
Sewer Issues
Dear Brad,
,aus ~ 5 zoos
Ci7Y OF MERIDIAN
clrY cz~RK oFFrcF
As you are aware, the preliminary plat for Tuscany Village was approved by Planning
Commission last week. As a condition of approval, we ate to meet with the azea
neighbors to discuss the controversy over our proposed realignment of the 27" trunk line
through ow property prior to our City Council meeting on September 9s', 2003. Prior to
meeting with the area residents, we are forwarding additional supporting information for
you review and information. We would appreciate Meridian's support for our superior
alignment that will save money for Tuscany Development, the City of Meridian, and
future sewer connectors in this area. At the same time, development will finance and pay
a proportionate shaze for sewer infrastructure.
Exhibit `A' indicates the sewer infrastructure installed by Tuscany Development to date.
We have installed over 20,000 feet of 8"-2T' sewer main to service our development and
upstream properties on our project boumiaries on Locust Grove, Eagle, and Victory
Road.
Exhibit `B' indicates the completion of our 27" sewer infrastructure as proposed and
submitted. We understand that if City Council decides to approve Tuscany Village on
September 9, 2003, we will be able to construct in accordance with preliminary plat and
submitted sewer plans immediately. To stay ahead of home construction, this work needs
to commence in September and will require approximately 2 weeks to complete.
Exhibit `C' indicates the proposed completion of Tuscany Village and Messina Hills #2
next spring which will extend sewer service to the property lines of additional properties
in the service area. In accordance with standard development practice, adjacent
properties may connect with the existing right-of--way or a negotiated easement.
Alternatively, they may wait for sewer to be extended by adjacent properties.
Exhibit `D' indicates the service area and property impacted by the Master Plan route in
Victory and Locust Grove Road. Since a majority of the Kuntz/DeChambeau property
may be served through Tuscany Lakes, the service area is approximately 92 acres with
the majority of parcels under 10 acres. The Tuscany Development properties including
Tuscany Village total approximately 5901ots on 220 acres.
Exhibit `E' is an excerpt from a Sewer Master Plan Report by NB Engineers, Inc
indicating half-full service capacities for various sewer pipe sizes at an assumed
development density of 3.5 per acre. Even if the impacted service area of 92 acres
developed at a greater density, a 10" line appears to be more than adequate. In addition, a
27" line is designed at half-full to service 9,2441ots/services. Our "large" project of 590
lots only requires a 10"-12" line and utilizes only 6.4% of the half capacity of a 27" line.
Exhibit `F' is our cost to construct all sewer infrastructure shown on Exhibit `B'
including our preferred trunk route.
Exhibit `G' is the cost to construct the 27"sewer in the current Master Plan alignment.
In addition, the cost to construct an 8" sewer line in the preferred alignment is indicated.
The overall cost difference is approximately $146,000. This amount may increase due to
the variable costs associated with 2 bore crossings and major pavement replacement.
The point and purpose of the various exhibits is to clearly demonstrate Tuscany
Development has installed significant sewer infrastructure in the area that is vastly
oversized for our development or any other properties in the immediate vicinity. To
require our development to install additional 27" sewer in Locust Grove and Victory
roads when a more economical alignment is available is a huge waste of Tuscany
Development and City money.
The final point of this letter is to inform the City of Meridian we are proceeding with the
completion of sewer infrastructure for our upstream developments dependent on this
alignment September lOs`, 2003. We will respect whatever decision the informed City
Council makes regarding this issue. If our request is denied, we will construct the sewer
in Victory and Locust Grove Road at our cost and request reimbursement from the City
for the difference indicated above in addition to the normal oversizing reimbursement.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Matthew Schultz, P
Project Manager
Cc: City Clerk, Meridian
Dean Briggs, P.E., Briggs Engineering
Brent Claiborne, P.E., Claibbome Waite Engineering
3~~d~
z
w
w
O
J
W
W
z
Q
U
N
F-
m
w
F-
w
J
W
O
U
W
W
C7
Z
1-
X
w
I
a
m
x
w
Z
a
i~
N
W
L~
O
F-
O
O
0
O
N
I'rJ
O
O
N
H
cn
C7
Q
0
v
U_
~~~d~
1S
z
w
w
0
J
W
W
Z
a
v
>-
m
w
w
w
0
Z
O
w
J
O
U
D
W
O
O
m
m_
x
w
r-~
0
0
N
U
O
3~~d~
z
w
w
0
J
W
W
Z
Q
U
I-
07
Z
O ~
~ O
w ~
J n1
~ ~
~z
O
U ~
~ ~
W
W
D
W
O
O
CU
Oo
S
X
w
3~~d3
w
0
z
Q
J
Q'
W
H
Ul
Q
m ~
W
~ ~
W U
I- Q
U
Q N
d ~
(I7
W
W
d
~'
D
H
m
S
X
W
Parcel # Name Acres % Address
1 Mr. and Mrs. Lonnie Agnew 4 4.3% ,5so E. ~~otory, 83642
2 Ms. Catherine Jerrems 6 6.5% 3245 S. Locust Grove
3 Quasar Development 10 10.9% CWE, 146, S. Teare Ave
4 Mr. Russell Liddell 7 7.~% ,777 E. Victory
5 Ms. Susan Howard 7 7.6% 34205. Locust Grove
6 Mr. and Mrs. Charles Richardson 7 7.6% ,835 E. Victory
7 Mr. and Mrs. Webb 4 4.3% ,s75 E. v~tav
8 Mr. Charles Creech 6 6.5% 23,0 E. Victory
9 Mr. Clayton Record 5 5.4% 4355 E. Victory
10 Mr. Marvin Hansen 6 6.5% 2460 E. v~tory
11 Ms. Luann Kuntz 30 32.6% 4aow. t,°i~, ao~se, a37o4
Ms. Mary DeChambeau 2075 E. Victory
Total 92 100.0%
m1
N
N
1 ~ r
O
U
LL
Z
Y
a
W
a
J
a
U
N
W
a
O
J
y
~ u
~_
Z u
~ a
a
Uu
a~
U t
W ~
Uc
Q f
wu
N
1
WC
W
y ~
J .
a:
Ui
at
c
~~
,..,
V N m n~,N
r r N
d' V-N~m M
M`6) m r O'm ~', V'.N
n O?'Ol ', °I O ~
mIM W~M,~
M V, n,r ~ ~n'.
t~ ~f1'n'I d' (D ~'~n,M
C O',m,N in m
m O
R
£
' l
O
O.O OI N ~
7 tCl W~'~~
N °
V' O O"~.p r r N,M'
W n M!O'',
' O ~
` `
~ I ~
~ ' '
m i
~ I r N
M f0 O
Nam I
... I I
~
~ i
V m m'in'
n r
n l~ m ~v'r
~ M!d''~~ ~n' v'o
~ n'o'r ',n
u],r n N
rn M
01 r m M m.v M'',rn
O,r i 1f1 n cn',~o'!n
n 7 V.m M a
V O
o
m
m ~
• .
r rIN m cv'm,m
''
~ m M',c~:M
O'
~" rn o r M,v n
' co:v~v
'
:N
M n M,,MIm
~"m MIOi rn m
[D
m~ .~
> d
~ r
Q
~
i r
r:N
A M (
O
T
r O
NN
~ ~ r
.
~
~
r
I .
Mi(O 2
y Q j li ~ ! i
. i i m
' I
I ~ (o
~
-
~N
V
r m
~ O'
N
°
N
m ~ M
m
i
~V
O M
O1 O~ r~d'
''
~ti
OEM
m J
d C n
V -
~R„ ~
'Ir lid
N.a'a0 ,O1 OIO
~
O;M;a N ~.
n [7,n'.In ~(
D
m'T . f
°
m 0. ~'u7 ,
0
a) Wei tT~
)i .
Olr
n N~,n'O?
O r
N
W
~ O1 C I i riio,m O1
I N N:('WJ '.~ O
:r r,~r N M'ln i6
T m'N'V (
D
I C
J M y
N C B t I'
' II ~I _
~~ ~ ~ I i
~~ r N O
'o In 'O1 m;m m,rn~m~M m Ol~:m n
'n
' N 71~0'M
'' n m~:N~N
`lg
0 ~f1i NI~O
N
mlrn
n m N
M n ~
m
C
~ ? V;1n.r~ln
ni•_;n;m O in;n'm
v;o;o m N,, V'. M
n,v~rn;o r
m
cn w ~n m
m n
rn o'~LO r M r
i
m'n m,rn ,
co ninlm
' ~ n ~
• 'r'rN m N
m ~ LL7 N~6) O MM r M;R.n O u1'~IM ~LL7
m '. O N
~ ~ j ,
r ~r ~
'
N M mrn r m O r'N'M V m;M'Q~ [m9 t~D ~
~
~ I
, N to
I
'~
~ c
i
N G I I I I
~ ~ I~ ~
~~
~ '~ n
a
~ 'I I
~
l r
~
~ i M
rn v.
r
M
O
N v rn v o
N N
O.V ~ M m'n
N
? n~,M ". ui M.n
M M v m.n rn
N M,~L) m m m
M~o
c~/'O?~m'N
' O~;~n
W
N
n,r'r~N v o
N m ,',
~
R
R. ~ ` ,
i
I
O~0 .010 i
r,
N.C7 V h N`G~ CO N O 010 O r,,N 1, d ~n OIIWIN V m
.
d C V ! ! i
~ i ,r M,(O ~, I,
~ ~
> R LL ...
~
~ I a
Q N i,
1
~
1 ~ '~
' ~
'° C ~ m~m
mn
o rn m n O
N~~
~~
v M c~ r ~r
'N
O.V
o mi~,~ n m
a M 'M O
tn.V
m n'm .n n m,MN
M N rjo !~n ~, (D
N n
m n ~I~ N V
v~ ~
a
V Y V C7 N N N N N N N CV r',r,r N N'N N N NININ r rjr'ir .
L I ~ ~ ~~ ~ W
V d l I , ~
d °~ y m n m m
O T:m
n ~f1 d' `0
N',r
C M' 0.0 N
O m f~ m n m
~ M u7 V M O
m n,m W m.M N
n
M N,rlO N n tfi cD
°~ I~.(O.ln
~ N ~t
~ M c
o
> C°
j~ V i
N:N
M N ,
N,N NiN N r'~,r~ r~~r N CViN fV N N NiN r~ilr
.r r r c
R
y a a ,
i ~
I
I
I
I ~
~ ~ '
~' m M'.r
N'a m 4? In O1'W M
C 01
In ;
n t[1 N'N~~O
m N'NO M~m
tfi0~ O1 d' O1 N
fDO 7 N 'n
'O'~M
N O N V ~ m m
~N
r m con
' ~n
ch r p
E
3
Y
m ~ w o 0 0,0 ,
,
~i~oi v~ ai.v r o
' M ui o r ~ N
I ri v!vi m co:n
r n
r N;M n of
m O ,~
~
°
= IL
°
• ! I r N
,M ln,m I I r W
.
.
.
N
N N
I
~^ M-In.n,r
O'O O,r M m N-M
MI'p n~0 N 01 W-O~
C V Tlm v n
n r m N m m
O r',r N a M v_~n
V m 01 ch n m',N M
[O N N m n V'
N r Q
p
~
i E=~ O 0 0
O, O:O'O'r rN.M ~. to r 0 O.O~O O O O O-r r M:~nn R] N N
r •~
~
C V ,
~ ~
.
I I
j I
'! r N
'~ y I ~ y
~ ...
W i ~,
~
I £ ~ a
~ Y r n-m.N
M v'.m O m n.n fD
m rn.min m 01
N.n NO m M
Nr r
N n m m
n ~ LL] ~n N n N
m O'r~m
~ u7 O lq
O r T R7
~ m OJ
u'1'N U
.U
° O I'r
°
° N ci'iri
n O fD N~',~ ~~ fn O r N M in
n~m T N
C] V mM ~
`
.
.
~ F d IL ,
'~ l r r c
. r ~
~ m m m m T 1+9 ~n T
_ _ Lf]'u7 u7 W
_ _ _ W t[9
_ _ C
~ M MM _M
0 0 0 0 M M M M
0 0.0 0 M M M M
0 0 0 0 M M
0 0 c
L
C n
Rc 0 0 0 0
ooo'o 0 0 0 0
oooo 0 0 O.O
ocoo 0 0
oo !
x
oooo
o,oo'o
oooo
oo c
~
R
1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N o 0 0 o a o 0 0` 0 0 0 0 0 0
j 0 0 0 0
O m N LL~ 0 0
N O O O O O O O O O N N N ~n
O T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r
°-
° V,N Nr
0 0
O O r r r,r
O~O
0' O r r r
O O O.O r r
O O 7+
m ~
r
0 0 0 0 r r r
0 0 O~O r r r r
0 0 0 ~O O O
i
~ . ~
} {(~ ~n N
~! In lf7 1f7 In Lfl to In Lf7 111 1I7 Q r r r r
r ~ r r r r r ~
°
_
- ~ £ ° ° °'° n n n n
0 0 0'0 n n n n
0 0'0 0 n n
o d ~
° I
~ V. ' '
d R_
j ~.
~
~ ~
I '. I E
~
~ a
~
0
- £~ N ~n
'O
m m V..n
r N'N N fD N.m
O
M M,v `.v O N
m n d
_ m O N In
r r,r m V n
rN NiN O m N m
M M V V O N
m n
G ~ W~ -i 'I I I 3 ~ '.
~ •~ " LL
a
c
N
c ~
0
c
m
'o.
n
m _)
o `~-s
o• 'U\ /\
d
nl m a
c °' m
N n
_ m
L
~ 3
m ° „^
m
~ c a
n o
o0
c a
N (n ~ y
o cv c
U ~
c a a
s~o ~,
o ~ C C
a -c o m
c c ~ a
o m o m N
a m
N ~ O G ) U
m n ~ 3 ~ m
N .0 ~ = = y
n D a ' ~ ~ 9 aai
o m o "c ~
m
c E = ~ ° m
~ a o 0 0 d c
¢_
E ~~ a a d 3
~ cc7c7a^
E w oom.n
vl E N ~IJ m N f7
a m a N
m S m
a A a
N O d 0 0 0 0
ma ~! aaaa
N N N N N N 11~
° m ° `~ m m m
N
_T
U
ti
a
m
U
OJ
c:
.Z
N
U)
U1
3
U7
TUSCANY DEVELOPMENT, INC. ~ ( 'p 1
MESSINA VILLAGE #1 ` T ~ l~ l~
PREFERRED ROUTE-SEWER COST
11-Ju1-03
Prepared By: Matthew Schultz, P.E.
Offsite Sewer Through Tuscany Lakes #1
Depth
Item Range Quantit Unit Price Total
27" Sewer 28' - 24' 60 $83.00 $4,980.00
27" Sewer 24' - 20' 614 $76.00 $46,664.00
27" Sewer 20' - 16' 3037 $63.00 $191,331.00
24" Sewer 20' - 16' 920 $52.00 $47,840.00
15" Sewer 28' - 24' 45 $52.00 $2,340.00
15" Sewer 24' - 20' 40 $46.00 $1,840.00
15" Sewer 20' - 16' 644 '~ $38.00 $24,472.00
15" Sewer 16' - 12' 1463 $32.00 $46,816.00
15" Sewer 12' - 8' 290 $25.00 $7,250.00
48" Manhole 16' - 12' 5 $1,700.00 $8,SD0.00
48" Manhole 12' - 8' 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
60" Manhole 28' - 24' 1 $3,700.00 $3,700.00
60" Manhole 24' - 20' 2 $3,300.00 $6,600.00
60" Manhole 20' - 16' 19 $2,800.00 $53,200.00
36" Sleeve NA 60 $130.00 $7,800.00
AC Replace NA 30650 $1.50 $45,975.00
Gravel Access NA 1887 $8.00 $15,096.00
Subtotal $515,904.00
Offsite Sewer Throuoh Future Development
Depth
Item Range uanti Unit Price Total
15" Sewer 24' - 20' 1484 $46.00 $68,264.00
15" Sewer 2D' - 1 B' 2793 $38.00 $106,134.00
4" Sewer NA 1812 $10.50 $19,026.00
Sewer Tee NA 52 $125.00 $6,500.00
60" Manhole 24' - 20' 9 $3,300.00 $29,700.00
60" Manhole 20' - 16' 14 $2,800.00 $39,200.00
24" Sleeve NA 120 $120.00 $14,400.00
Gravel Access NA 2218 $8.00 $17,744.00
Subtotal $300,968.00
Messina ~Ilaae #1 Onsite Sewer
Depth
Item Ranae Quantity Unit Price Total
15" Sewer 20' - 16' 345 $38.00 $13,110.00
15" Sewer 16' - 12' 492 $32.00 $15,744.00
8" Sewer 20' - 16' 432 $28.00 $12,096.00
8" Sewer 16' - 12' 949 $24.00 $22,776.00
8" Sewer 12' - 8' 1814 $16.50 $29,931.00
8" Sewer 8' - 6' 83 $14.D0 $1,162.00
4" Sewer NA 2176 $10.50 $22,848.00
15" Sewer Tee NA 13 $125.00 $1,625.00
8"Sewer Tee NA 39 $39.00 $1,521.00
60" Manhole 20' - 16' 1 $2,800.00 $2,800.00
48" Manhole 20' - 16' 2 $1,900.00 $3,800.00
48" Manhole 16' - 12' 8 $1,700.00 $13,600.00
48" Manhole 12' - 8' 9 $1,500.00 $13,500.00
48"Manhole 8'-6' 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00
Cleanout NA 3 $550.00 $1,650.00
Subtotal ~ $157,363.00
TOTAL $974,235.00
TUSCANY DEVELOPMENT, INC. ~~~ 1 ~ la ~ 1
MESSINA VILLAGE #7
MASTER PLAN ROUTE -SEWER COST
11-Jul-03
Prepared By: Matthew Schultz, P.E.
Offsite Sewer Through Tuscany Lakes #1
Depth
Item Ranoe Quanti Unit Price Total
27" Sewer 28' - 24' 60 $83.00 $4,980.00
27" Sewer 24' - 20' 614 $76.00 $46,664.00
27" Sewer 20' - 16' 3522 $63.00 $221,886.00
24" Sewer 20' - 16' 920 $52.00 $47,840.00
15" Sewer 28' - 24' 45 $52.00 $2,340.00
15" Sewer 24' - 20' 40 $46.00 $1,840.00
15" Sewer 20' - 16' 644 $38.00 $24,472.00
15" Sewer 16' - 12' 1463 $32.00 $46,816.00
15" Sewer 12' - 8' 290 $25.00 $7,250.00
48" Manhole 16' - 12' S $1,700.00 $8,500.00
48" Manhole 12' - 8' 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
60" Manhole 28' - 24' 1 $3,700.00 $3,700.00
60" Manhole 24' - 20' 2 $3,300.00 $6,600.00
60" Manhole 20' - 16' 14 $2,800.00 $39,200.00
36" Sleeve NA 60 $130.00 $7,800.00
36" Bore NA 100 $406.40 $40,640.00
AC Replace NA 58572 $1.50 $87,858.00
Gra vel Access NA 800 $8.00 $6,400.00
Subtotal
Offsite Sewer Through Future Development
$606,286.00
Depth
Item Ronne uantit Unit Price Total
15" Sewer 24' - 20' 1484 $46.00 $68,264.00
15" Sewer 20' - 16' 2793 $38.00 $106,134.00
4" Sewer NA 1812 $10.50 $19,026.00
Sewer Tee NA 52 $125.00 $6,500.00
60" Manhole 24' - 20' 9 $3,300.00 $29,700:00
60" Manhole 20' - 16' 14 $2,800.00 $39,200.00
24" Sleeve NA 120 $120.00 $14,400.00
Gravel Access NA 2218 $8.00 $17,744.00
1 ~ f
Subtotal $300,968.00
Messina Village #1 Onsite Sewer
Depth
Item Range Quantity Unit Price Total
15" Sewer 20' - 16' 345 $38.00 $13,110.00
15" Sewer 16' - 12' 492 $32.00 $15,744.00
8" Sewer 20' - 16' 432 $28.00 $12,096.00
8" Sewer 16' -12' 949 $24.00 $2'1,776.00
8" Sewer 12' - 8' 1814 $16.50 $29,931.00
8"Sewer 8'-6' 83 $14.00 $1,162.00
4" Sewer NA 2176 $10.50 $22,848.00
15" Sewer Tee NA 13 $125.00 $1,625.00
8"Sewer Tee NA 39 $39.00 $1,521.00
60" Manhole 20' - 16' 1 $2,800.00 $2,800.00
48" Manhole 20'- 16' 2 $1,900.00 $3,800.00
48" Manhole 16' - 12' 8 $1,700.00 $13,600.00
48" Manhole 12'- 8' 9 $1,500.00 $13,500.00
48" Manhole 8' -6' 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00
Cleanout NA 3 $550.00 $1,650.00
Subtotal $157,363.00
Tuscany Village #1 Onsite Sewer
Depth
Item Ranoe Quantity Unit Price Total
8" Sewer 20' - 16' 200 $28.00 $5,600.00
8" Sewer 16' - 12' 950 $24.00 $22,800.00
8" Sewer 12' - 8' 950 $16.50 $15,675.00
48" Manhole 20' - 16' 1 $1,900.00 $1,900.00
48" Manhole 18' - 12' 3 $1,700.00 $5,100.00
48" Manhole 12'-8' 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00
Subtotal
TOTAL
Master Plan Route
Preferced Route
$1,120,192
$974,235
$55,575.00
$1,720,192.00
Difference $145,957