Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSageland PD AZ 03-015August 18, 2003 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING August 21, 2003 AZ 03-015 APPLICANT Quasar Development, LLC ITEM NO. 1.3 REQUEST Public Hearing — Request for annexation and zoning of 9.8 acres from RUT to R-8 zones for proposed Sageland Planned Development — northeast comer of South Locust Grove Road and East Victory Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See o_H ached S1aPf'CoMMellie CITY ATTORNEY JV CITY POLICE DEPT: �f) CITY FIRE DEPT: See attached Comments o (Nr � , CITY BUILDING DEFT: CITY WATER DEPT: Fel CITY SEWER DEPT: 11 CITY PARKS DEPT: See attached Comments MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: \ SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: Contacted: Emailed: See attached Comments See attached Comments Materials presented at public shall become properly of the MU 5&vw, Sharon Smith From: Sharon Smith Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 9:49 AM To: Will Berg Cc: Tara Green; Jessica Johnson Subject: Tuscany Sewer Reroute - Sageland PD Gary Smith called with a few items, one being the above, in response to his copy of Amanda Alvaro's original letter the Mayor brought over to our office. Gary said that public works' stance on the proposed Tuscany Development sewer reroute is this -- stick to the Sewer Master plan as was shown in the public hearings for the Tuscany applications. OR submit a new application for new public hearings, which we have not yet seen happen. Gary said Bruce Freckleton will be prepared to say the same tonight. Thanks! Sharron Smith Wendian City Cherks Office Th. 888-4433 ext 210 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET DATE August 21, 2003 ITEM # PROJECT NUMBER AZ 03-015 13 PROJECT NAME Sageland Planned Development NAME (PLEASE PRINT) FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL S Cho X u -�- -L AUG 2 1 2003 0 3�SV3 Hol 1S FXCEIVED AUG 2 1 2003 OF MERIDIAN Li w V) w w O PEI SAGELAND DEVELOPMENT OFFSITE SEWER 18 -Aug -03 Prepared By: Matthew Schultz, P.E. Offsite Sewer Connection to Tuscany Village in Victory Road See Exhibit'A' .LW AUG 2 1 2003 CITY OF :MERIDIAN Total $14,820.00 $3,400.00 $10,260.00 $28,480.00 $730 Per Lot Depth Item Range Quantity Unit Price 10" Sewer 16'- 12' 570 $26.00 48" Manhole 16'- 12' 2 $1,700.00 AC Replace NA 6840 $1.50 Total Total Site 39 Lots .LW AUG 2 1 2003 CITY OF :MERIDIAN Total $14,820.00 $3,400.00 $10,260.00 $28,480.00 $730 Per Lot TUSCANY DEVELOPMENT, INC. TUSCANY LAKES OFFSITE SEWER 18 -Aug -03 Prepared By: Matthew Schultz, P.E. Offsite Sewer To Tuscany Lakes #1 See Exhibit "B" PCETVED AUG 2 1 2003 CITY OF 1 ERIDM Depth Item Range Quantit Unit Price Total 27" Sewer 28'- 24' 60 $83.00 $4,980.00 27" Sewer 24'- 20' 614 $76.00 $46,664.00 27" Sewer 20'- 16' 3037 $63.00 $191,331.00 15" Sewer 28'- 24' 45 $52.00 $2,340.00 15" Sewer 24'- 20' 20 $46.00 $920.00 15" Sewer 20'- 16' 474 $38.00 $18,012.00 15" Sewer 16'- 12' 1243 $32.00 $39,776.00 15" Sewer 12'- 8' 290 $25.00 $7,250.00 48" Manhole 16'- 12' 4 $1,700.00 $6,800.00 60" Manhole 28'- 24' 1 $3,700.00 $3,700.00 60" Manhole 24'- 20' 2 $3,300.00 $6,600.00 60" Manhole 20'- 16' 15 $2,800.00 $42,000.00 AC Replace NA 22418 $1.50 $33,627.00 Gravel Access NA 1887 $8.00 $15,096.00 Total $419,096 Messina Village #1 52 Lots Messina Hills #1 59 Lots Tuscany Lakes #1 54 Lots $7,761 Per Lot Total First Phase 165 Lots $2,540 Per Lot Total Site 454 Lots $923 Per Lot PCETVED AUG 2 1 2003 CITY OF 1 ERIDM PCEIVED r AUG 2 1 2003 1. Separate 20' Community Pathway common lot. 2. Hard surface micropath connection 3. Separated sidewalks and landscape strips. 4. Large 1/2 -acre private parr 5. Utility crossings for system looping and extensions. 6. Durable wrought iron and vinyl fencing 7. Subsurface drain water storage and treatment. 8. Angular lot lines for stair stepping effect to beautify and give variety to the Streetscape. 9. Shared driveway and side entry garage home designs. 10. Convenient neighborhood transit stop. . 11. Preserve existing farmhouse w/ Private Road. 12. Preserve existing, trees and shrubbery. - RECE�D AUU 03 _0N srReFr! �- _0Aj s eer _ soy CITY OF MN 11,' Aft q. .,., , PARKfNC pR0 8 >1 D re A KIfVG LLOyyEp, 50,0 N 4 O 42. PRF in II 6,392 sq. ft. < r x � 50 2 ft. 12 'n - Bad Co w Lot 01.0•UD ro I m�n `Stir L©tuepos Ltd TVMD TAM — x= 5,050 sq. ft. �1 S`ISji rai 101.0'—1 N 0 022 oar do 5,050 sq. ft. 101.0' 5,050 sq. ft. b a 5022 sq. ft. % o I to O o m �l 01.0' x , INSTALL 24• SWING b'.' o / GATE W/BOLLARDS , , y , n SSCRETE AREA Jk2 D - T --- - - - T - -- -- ----- T ===T -- T - _=-- J., RIVEWAY APPROH - - G (1200 = PREVIOUS LOT DIMENSION smEMOOR LANE (LOT 9, BLK2) REVISION OPTION 2 s ao eo 0 40 SAGELA w D PD PROJECTNO. 1 SCALE: 1 " = 40' A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION 2145 cloiborn A► woite consulting, lic (208) 884-5533 FAX 888-6854 STAFF REPORT: Hearing Date: August 21, 2003 To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission RECEMM From: Wendy Kirkpatrick, Planner II AUG 1: g 2003 Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech CITY OF MERIDIAN Re: Sageland Subdivision CITY CLERK OFFICE • Annexation and Zoning of 9.8 Acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-8 (Medium Density Residential District), by Quasar Development, LLC (File No. AZ -03- 15). • Preliminary Plat Approval of Thirty-nine (39) Building Lots and Nine (9) Other Lots on 9.8 Acres in a Proposed R-8 Zone, by Quasar Development, LLC (File No. PP -03-020). • Conditional Use Permit Approval for a Planned Development Consisting of Thirty-nine (39) Single-family Detached Lots, One private "Neighborhood" Park and Eight (8) Common Lots on 9.8 Acres in a Proposed R-8 Zone. The Proposed Planned Development Includes a Request to Allow Reduced Lot Sizes, Reduced Frontage Requirements and Reduced Setbacks, by Quasar Development, LLC (File No. CUP -03-036). We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, Quasar Development, LLC, has applied for the Annexation and Zoning, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit approval of a Planned Development consisting of 39 buildable lots and 9 other lots on 9.8 acres of land located at the northeast intersection of S. Locust Grove Road and W. Victory Road. The land is presently zoned RUT, and the applicants have requested that upon annexation, all of the property be zoned R-8. The applicant's preliminary plat approval request is for 39 building lots and 9 other lots. The "other" lots include a half acre park, five open space/ landscaping lots, two micro -path lots, AZ -03-015, PP -03-020, CUP43-036 SMei nd Subdivision. AZ.PP.CUP HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR A Good Place to LNC LEGAL DEPARTMENT Robert D. Come CITY OF MERIDIAN 1208) 288 - Fax 288-2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS Tammy deWeerd 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Ketch Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 898-5500 Fax 887-1297 Cherie McCandless (208) 888-0433 FAX(208)887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING William L.M. Nary City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 FAX 888-6854 STAFF REPORT: Hearing Date: August 21, 2003 To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission RECEMM From: Wendy Kirkpatrick, Planner II AUG 1: g 2003 Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech CITY OF MERIDIAN Re: Sageland Subdivision CITY CLERK OFFICE • Annexation and Zoning of 9.8 Acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-8 (Medium Density Residential District), by Quasar Development, LLC (File No. AZ -03- 15). • Preliminary Plat Approval of Thirty-nine (39) Building Lots and Nine (9) Other Lots on 9.8 Acres in a Proposed R-8 Zone, by Quasar Development, LLC (File No. PP -03-020). • Conditional Use Permit Approval for a Planned Development Consisting of Thirty-nine (39) Single-family Detached Lots, One private "Neighborhood" Park and Eight (8) Common Lots on 9.8 Acres in a Proposed R-8 Zone. The Proposed Planned Development Includes a Request to Allow Reduced Lot Sizes, Reduced Frontage Requirements and Reduced Setbacks, by Quasar Development, LLC (File No. CUP -03-036). We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, Quasar Development, LLC, has applied for the Annexation and Zoning, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit approval of a Planned Development consisting of 39 buildable lots and 9 other lots on 9.8 acres of land located at the northeast intersection of S. Locust Grove Road and W. Victory Road. The land is presently zoned RUT, and the applicants have requested that upon annexation, all of the property be zoned R-8. The applicant's preliminary plat approval request is for 39 building lots and 9 other lots. The "other" lots include a half acre park, five open space/ landscaping lots, two micro -path lots, AZ -03-015, PP -03-020, CUP43-036 SMei nd Subdivision. AZ.PP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003 Page 2 and one private road lot. The proposed residential lot sizes range from the proposed minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet up to 7,958 square feet. The gross density of the proposed subdivision is 3.97 dwelling units per acre and the net density of the subdivision is 4.43 dwelling units per acre. The project is a single phase development. The Planned Development application includes requests to allow reduced development standards including reduced setbacks, reduced lot size and reduced frontages. The applicant is not able to ask for a deviation from Private Street standards through the Planned Development application. The applicant will be required to submit a revised street plan showing that the proposed Private Street meets the Private Street standards found in the MCC. The following is a comparison of the City's minimum requirements and the reduced requirements that have been proposed by the applicant: Setbacks- City Requirements (R-8) Proposed Setbacks (single family) Front: 15' living area, 20' garage Front: 15' for non -front entry garage, 20' for front entry garage Rear: 15' Rear: 15' Interior Side: 5' Interior Side: 5' Lot Size- City Requirements (R-8) 6,500 sq.ft. (detached) Lot Frontage- City Requirements (R-8) 65'minimum (detached) Proposed Lot Sizes 5,000 sq.ft. (detached) Proposed Frontage 20' minimum (detached) The applicant has proposed the following amenities to fulfill the requirement of the Planned Development Ordinance to provide at least two amenities: 1.008 acres of common area (10.3% of gross land area) and a twenty -foot -wide multiple use pathway along the Eight Mile Lateral. Staff recommends approval of the proposed applications with conditions of approval. The legal description submitted with the application appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission and places the parcel contiguous to existing city limits. The subject property is within the Urban Service Planning Area and essential City services are or can be made available to the subject property. CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD Charles H. and Vickie A. Richardson are the current property owners and they have submitted an affidavit of legal interest to allow Quasar Development to apply for the three subject applications. AZ -03-015, PP -03-020, CUP -03-036 Segdend Subdivision AZ.PP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003 Page 3 LOCATION The property is located at the northeast intersection of S. Locust Grove Road and W. Victory Road. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North: Sherbrooke Hollows Subdivision (Single-family residential), zoned R-4. South: Rural residential, zoned RUT (Ada County). East: Sherbrooke Hollows Subdivision (Single-family residential), zoned R-4. West: Kachina Estates, (Single-family residential), zoned RUT (Ada County). ANNEXATION & ZONING ANALYSIS According to Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, both the P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment." The following is the list of standards found in 11-15-11 and analysis by staff: A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment; Staff finds that the requested zoning designation, R-8, is harmonious with and in accordance with the effective Comprehensive Plan (`02) and the Future Land Use Map, which designates the land to be "Medium Density Residential. " The Comprehensive Plan also indicates that the subject property should have a "Multi Use" pathway running along the northern and eastern edges of the subject property along the Eight Mile Lateral. Page 54 of the Comprehensive plan addresses the issue of pathways and states that they should be in compliance with the Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan (not yet adopted) and that the pathway should be located "off street". The applicant has indicated that they will construct a 10' asphalt multi -use pathway with five feet of gravel on both sides of the pathway along the Eight Mile Lateral. AZ -03-015, PPA3-030, CUP -03-036 Sageland Subdivision AZ.PP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003 Page 4 B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the future; The applicant has not indicated that they anticipate rezoning the subject property in the future. C. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning —for example, a residential area turning into a commercial area by means of conditional use permits; Staff finds that the proposed single family residential subdivision would be allowed within the requested R-8 zone, if accompanied with a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area; Staff finds that the land to the north and east of the subject property has been developed as residential subdivisions similar to the proposed subdivision. Staff finds that the requested zoning designation of R-8 is harmonious with the adjacent developments to the north and east of the subject property and should be rezoned as requested. While the applicant has applied for an R-8 zoning designation, the subject property is actually being developed at a density of four dwelling units per acre. E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; Staff finds that the proposed use (single family residential) will not change the existing (single family residential and rural residential) or intended character (medium density single family residential) of the area. F. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; The Commission and Council should rely on public testimony (oral and written) to determine whether or not the proposed uses will be disturbing or hazardous to the existing or future neighboring uses. Staff does not anticipate that the proposed residential uses will be hazardous or disturbing to future or existing neighbors. AZ 3-015. PP43-020. COP -03-036 S.plm SubdivisionA ,PP.COP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003 Page 5 G. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; Staff finds that the property to be annexed will or can be served adequately by all essential public facilities and services. Applicant shall be required to extend water and sanitary sewer mains to and through the proposed development, thereby making them available to the adjacent properties. The Fire Department has made the following recommendations: Prohibit parking on the proposed Sagemoor Lane and paint curbs of Sagemoor Lane red. Provide Fire Department access to the South end of Sagemoor Lane via a swing gate. Meridian's Planned Development Ordinance requires private streets over 200' in length to be 42' in width. The applicant will be required to revise the proposed private street so that the street meets private street standards. Please review ACHD and Fire Department comments concerning this subdivision for further information regarding public services and facilities H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; Staff finds that there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost for public services and facilities and that the annexation and zoning will not be detrimental to the community's economic welfare. The applicant will be responsible for extending water and sewer facilities to the subject property and for constructing all roads within the proposed subdivision. I. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; Staff finds that the proposed subdivision will not create excessive traffic, noise or other nuisances that would be detrimental to the general welfare of the surrounding area. AZ -03-015, PP -03-020, CUP -03-036 Sngeland Subdivision AZ.PP.0 P Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003 Page 6 Staff recognizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase upon build -out of the proposed subdivision; however staff does not feel that the amount generated will be detrimental to the public welfare of the city. J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; Staff finds that the subdivision's vehicular approaches off Victory Road and Locust Grove Road will not cause significant interference on the surrounding public streets. Please review ACHD comments concerning vehicular approaches and traffic generation. ACHD recommends approval of the proposed subdivision as submitted. K. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and The subject property is presently being used as pasture land. One single family dwelling and several outbuildings are located on the subject property. The proposed subdivision will not result in the loss or damage of scenic or natural features significant importance. Any existing trees larger than 4" caliper that are removed shall be mitigated for, per the Landscape Ordinance. L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of Meridian. (Ord. 592,11-17-1992)? Staff finds services are available to the site and that the inclusion of a pathway that will become a part of Meridian's pathway system makes the annexation of this property in the best interest of the City. ANEXATION AND ZONING CONDTIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services are available from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 2. A Development Agreement shall be required, the following shall be addressed in the Development Agreement: pathway standards and fencing requirements for the Pathway and micropaths. PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS AND REOUIREMENTS AZ -03-015. PP -03-020, CUP -03-036 Sagelmd Subdivision AZ.PP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003 Page 7 Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the following: a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan; Staff finds the subdivision to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned elsewhere in the staff report, the proposed subdivision meets goals of the Comprehensive Plan through the following: providing a pathway which will become a part of Meridian's pathway system, providing a park, and through the addition of a variety of housing types to Meridian's housing inventory. b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development; Staff finds that public services are available to accommodate the proposed development. The proposed subdivision is served by an existing network of streets and water and sewer mains are located within close proximity to the subject property. The developers of the Tuscany Village Subdivision, located at the southwest corner of Victory Road and Locust Grove Road, have proposed to extend the Ten Mile trunk line through their proposed subdivision, rather than following Meridian's Public Works master plan which shows the Ten Mile Trunk route following Victory Road and Locust Grove. If Council approves this alternate route for the Ten Mile Trunk, sewer will not be readily accessible to the developers of the Sageland Subdivision, and a substantial amount of off-site main would have to be installed by this developer. c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement program; Staff finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds; the developer will pay for the development of roads within the proposed subdivision and for the extension of city services to the proposed development. d. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Staff finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services; the developer will pay for the extension of urban services to the subject property and for roads within the subdivision. If Council approves the alternate routing of the Ten Mile trunk through the Tuscany Village subdivision sewer will not be located within close proximity of Sageland Subdivision. e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the Commission's attention. AZ -03-015, PMM20, CUP -03-036 Sagel d Subdivision AZ.PP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003 Page 8 Staff finds that there should not be any other health, safety or environmental problems associated with this subdivision that may be brought to the Council or Commission's attention. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS Private Street The applicant is proposing a 250' long and 29' wide Private Road (Sagemoor Lane). Meridian's Planned Development Ordinance requires Private Streets over 200' in length to be 42' in width. Meridian's Planned Development Ordinance does not allow for deviations from Private Street standards. The applicant will be required to revise the site plan to depict a Private Road which is 42' in width or 200' in length prior to the City Council hearing. Meridian's Fire Department approves of the proposed Private Road configuration with the addition of a swing gate at the south end of Sagemoor Lane and the prohibition of parking on Sagemoor Lane. Reduced Lot Requirements: The lot dimensions within the proposed subdivision are less than those required by the current Zoning Ordinance and would not be permitted without the applicant's request for a Planned Development. Shared driveways have been proposed for a number of the proposed lots which do not meet the dimensional standards for the R-8 district. The proposed shared driveways have allowed the applicant to build detached single family homes on the smaller proposed lots located on the northern side of the proposed W. Sagemoor Drive. Staff does not object to the requested reduced dimensions of the lots. Shared Driveways: The applicant is proposing shared driveways at the following locations: Lots 37 and 38, Block 2 Lots 38 and 39, Block 2 Lots 46 and 47, Block 2 Lots 16 and 17, Block 1 Lots 17 and 18, Block 1 Lots 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12,13,14, and 15, Block 1 Staff supports the use of shared driveways in the proposed subdivision. The developer's subject property has a number of constraints including: the relatively small size of the subject property, existing structures on the subject property and trees that the developer is attempting to preserve. The shared driveways are an innovative way to deal with site constraints. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS / PRELIMINARY PLAT 1. Sanitary sewer and water service to this site shall be via main line extensions from existing mains in the area. Applicant will be responsible for constructing the sewer and water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department AZ -03-015, PP-OM20, CUP -03-036 Sageland Subdivision AZ.PP.CU Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003 Page 9 The developers of the Tuscany Village Subdivision, located at the southwest comer of Victory Road and Locust Grove Road, have proposed to extend the Ten Mile trunk line through their proposed subdivision, rather than following Meridian's Public Works master plan which shows the Ten Mile Trunk route following Victory Road and Locust Grove. If the Meridian City Council approves this alternate route for the Ten Mile Trunk at their September 9fl' meeting, sewer will not be readily accessible to the developers of the Sageland Subdivision, and a substantial amount of off-site main would have to be installed by this developer. 2. A permanent pedestrian easement, in favor of the City of Meridian, shall be recorded for the pedestrian pathway prior to the final plat being recorded. The instrument number for the easement shall be referenced on the final plat. The easement shall be sufficient width to cover the 20 -foot wide pathway shown. The 10 -foot wide hard surfaced pathway shall be constructed and fully improved prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for any building within the subdivision. Additionally, a note shall be added to the face of the final plat indicating the City of Meridian is responsible for the maintenance of the pathway surface located within the easement. The note shall also indicate who will be responsible for landscaping maintenance within the easement. 3. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. The applicant has indicated that the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be connected to an existing Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District system. If a single -point backup connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted with the final plat application. The detailed landscape plan shall include a 6' wrought iron fence along the western and southern edges of the proposed neighborhood park to make it more difficult for children using the neighborhood park to come into contact with traffic on Locust Grove Road and Victory Road. 5. Revise the proposed Private Street to meet the Private Street standards of Meridian's Planned Development ordinance. 6. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-311. 7. Please submit up-to-date groundwater monitoring report to the Public Works Department for review. The report submitted with the application only identifies the groundwater elevation on the day the test holes were dug in April. The initial study indicates that shallow groundwater may be a factor. All drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water is retained only during 100 -year storm events, and for a period of time not to exceed 24 hours. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3:1. The project engineer should pay close attention to the results of field studies determining the groundwater, soil type & and characteristics during the design and construction phases. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline AZ -03-015, PP -03-020, CUP -03-036 Sagelmd Subdivision AZ.PP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003 Page 10 elevations are set a minimum of 3 -feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1 -foot above groundwater. 8. Sidewalks shall be installed within the subdivision and on the perimeter of the subdivision pursuant to MCC 12-13-10-8. 9. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 10. Add or revise the following preliminary plat notes: -Add a note to the face of the plat that requires any re -subdivision of this plat to be in compliance with the most recently approved subdivision standards of the City of Meridian. -Add a note to the face of the plat stating that no sight -obscuring fence shall be taller than four feet in height. 11. Ten (10) copies of a revised plat shall be submitted to the City Clerk's Office at least ten days prior to the next public hearing for this plat. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's approval letter for the subdivision name, and the lot and block numbering. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 3. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, play equipment, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 4. All micro -paths within the proposed subdivision shall be designed in accordance with MCC 12-13-15 "Micropath Landscaping". 5. A detailed landscape plan, in compliance with the landscape ordinance shall be submitted for the subdivision with the final plat application. 6. Sidewalks within the proposed subdivision shall be built in accordance with MCC 12-13- 10-8. 7. 250 and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. A7 03-0I5, PP -03420, COP -03-036 S,gd d Subdivision AZ.PP CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003 Page l I Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 8. The subject property has a number of mature trees. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to be removed. 9. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 10. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 11. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 12. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USES The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed conditional use in terms of the following and may approve a conditional use permit if they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11-17-3): A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open spaces, parking landscaping and other features as may be required by this ordinance; Staff finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the requested use and all required yards, open spaces and other features required by this ordinance. B. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance; The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the property as "Medium Density Residential. Staff finds that the proposed residential uses are harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. The project is being proposed as a conditional use for a planned development in order to allow reduced lot sizes, reduced street frontages, and reduced setbacks, If the project is approved as a Planned Development, with a Variance from Private Road dimensional standards, it will meet the minimum requirements of the MCC. AZ -03-015, PP -03.020, CUP -03-036 Segel Subdivision AZ.MCLP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003 Page 12 C. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area; Staff finds that the proposed residential subdivision use will be harmonious with the intended and existing character of the area. Property to the north and cast of the subject property has been developed as a single-family residential subdivision with an R-4 zoning designation. Property to the south and west of the subject property is designated as RUT (Ada County) and is designated as Low Density Residential (to the west of the subject property) and Medium Density Residential (to the south of the subject property.) D. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity; Staff does not anticipate that the proposed project will have an adverse impact on other properties within the vicinity; however, the Commission and Council should consider any testimony (written and oral) presented at the public hearings before making this finding. E. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; Staff finds that the proposed development will be adequately served by the essential public facilities and services listed above. The applicant will extend sewer and water to the subject property and the proposed subdivision will be served by an existing roadway network and City of Meridian police and fire protection. F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; Staff finds that the proposed use would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community, nor would it create the need for any new facilities or services to be paid for by the public that would be considered excessive. The developer will pay for the extension of existing sewer and water lines to the proposed development and for roads within the subdivision. G. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; AZ -03-015, PP -03-030, CU -03-036 Sa ele Subdivision AZ.PRCUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003 Page 13 Staff finds that there will be an increase in traffic and noise in the general vicinity if the subdivision is approved, but that approval of the subdivision will not lead to a major increase in smoke, fumes, glare, odors or other disturbances that will be considered detrimental to the welfare of the City and the subdivision's neighbors. H. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; Staff finds that the proposed use will not create significant interference with any traffic on the surrounding public streets. Please review the ACHD report for this project for additional information regarding this finding. ACHD has recommended approval of the proposed subdivision as submitted. I. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. Staff does not find that any natural or scenic feature will be lost, damaged or destroyed by issuance of this conditional use. Existing trees greater than 4" caliper must be retained or mitigated for, if removed. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS (Conditional Use Permit) Applicant shall meet all of the requirements of the preliminary plat as a condition of the Conditional Use Permit. 2. All development shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. The reductions to the frontage and minimum lot sizes are approved as submitted. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES Chapter VI, Goal III, Objective A, Action 3: Provide a variety of park types (neighborhood parks, regional parks) interspersed throughout the community. The development's proposed half -acre park meets the intent of this Comprehensive Plan Action Chapter VII, Goal V, Objective A, Action 4: Provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes and multi -family arrangements) and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of location suitable for residential development. AZ -033015, PP -03020, CUP -03036 Sa ebu Subdivision AZ.PP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Transmittal Date: August 14, 2003 Page 14 The proposed single-family homes with their diversity of building styles, building materials, and side -entry garages meet the intent of this Comprehensive Plan Action. The proposed single- family homes will help to diversify the types of housing available in Meridian by providing additional housing choices. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation/rezone, preliminary plat, and conditional use permit with the aforementioned findings and conditions. If the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that the applicant makes substantial changes to the application staff recommends that the hearing be continued to allow staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission additional time to review changes made to the application. AZ03-015, P AMM, CC -03-036 SMel dSubdivisionA TRCIP r �C% � � �r�csS�ordsg C3Lo, ; �k-- e3 TUSCANY DEVELOPMENT. INC P.O. Box 344, Meridian, ID 83680 (208) 888-9946 (208) 888-9947 FAX August 15, 2003 Brad Watson, P.E. Meridian City Engineer 660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 200 Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Tuscany Village Sewer Issues Dear Brad, RECEIVED AUG 15 2003 CITY OF MERIDIAN C" CLERK OFFICE As you are aware, the preliminary plat for Tuscany Village was approved by Planning Commission last week. As a condition of approval, we are to meet with the area neighbors to discuss the controversy over our proposed realignment of the 27" trunk line through our property prior to our City Council meeting on September 0, 2003. Prior to meeting with the area residents, we are forwarding additional supporting information for you review and information. We would appreciate Meridian's support for our superior alignment that will save money for Tuscany Development, the City of Meridian, and future sewer connectors in this area. At the same time, development will finance and pay a proportionate share for sewer infrastructure. Exhibit `A' indicates the sewer infrastructure installed by Tuscany, Development to date. We have installed over 20,000 feet of 8"-2T' sewer main to service our development and upstream properties on our project boundaries on Locust Grove, Eagle, and Victory Road. Exhibit `B' indicates the completion of our 2T' sewer infrastructure as proposed and submitted. We understand that if City Council decides to approve Tuscany Village on September 9, 2003, we will be able to construct in accordance with preliminary plat and submitted sewer plans immediately. To stay ahead of home construction, this work needs to commence in September and will require approximately 2 weeks to complete. Exhibit `C' indicates the proposed completion of Tuscany Village and Messina Hills 92 next spring which will extend sewer service to the property lines of additional properties in the service area. In accordance with standard development practice, adjacent properties may connect with the existing right-of-way or a negotiated easement. Alternatively, they may wait for sewer to be extended by adjacent properties. Exhibit `D' indicates the service area and property impacted by the Master Plan route in Victory and Locust Grove Road. Since a majority of the Kuntz/DeChambeau property may be served through Tuscany Lakes, the service area is approximately 92 acres with the majority of parcels under 10 acres. The Tuscany Development properties including Tuscany Village total approximately 590 lots on 220 acres. Exhibit `E' is an excerpt from a Sewer Master Plan Report by NB Engineers, Inc indicating half -full service capacities for various sewer pipe sizes at an assumed development density of 3.5 per acre. Even if the impacted service area of 92 acres developed at a greater density, a 10" line appears to be more than adequate. In addition, a 27" line is designed at half -full to service 9,244 lotstservices. Our "large" project of 590 lots only requires a 10"-12" line and utilizes only 6.4% of the half capacity of a 27" line. Exhibit `F' is our cost to construct all sewer infrastructure shown on Exhibit `B' including our preferred trunk route. Exhibit `G' is the cost to construct the 27"sewer in the current Master Plan alignment. In addition, the cost to construct an 8" sewer line in the preferred alignment is indicated. The overall cost difference is approximately $146,000. This amount may increase due to the variable costs associated with 2 bore crossings and major pavement replacement. The point and purpose of the various exhibits is to clearly demonstrate Tuscany Development has installed significant sewer infrastructure in the area that is vastly oversized for our development or any other properties in the immediate vicinity. To require our development to install additional 27" sewer in Locust Grove and Victory roads when a more economical alignment is available is a huge waste of Tuscany Development and City money. The final point of this letter is to inform the City of Meridian we are proceeding with the completion of sewer infrastructure for our upstream developments dependent on this alignment September 10"', 2003. We will respect whatever decision the informed City Council makes regarding this issue. If our request is denied, we will construct the sewer in Victory and Locust Grove Road at our cost and request reimbursement from the City for the difference indicated above in addition to the normal oversizing reimbursement. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Matthew Schultz, P Project Manager Cc: City Clerk, Meridian Dean Briggs, P.E., Briggs Engineering Brent Claiborne, P.E., Clairborne Waite Engineering AIM MM MM MM MM to 11111 1111111 ■1111, 1111111 ma mm mC C. u+ 11111 111111N ■1111 111111 an :M MM MM M+ on M. �1w �M 11111 (♦11111 11111; 11111! no m+ milli iiiiii Parcel # Name Acres % Address 1 Mr. and Mrs. Lonnie Agnew 4 4.3% 1560 E. Victory, 83642 2 Ms. Catherine Jerrems 6 6.5% 3245 S. Locust Grove 3 Quasar Development 10 10.9% CWE, 1461 S. Teare Ave 4 Mr. Russell Liddell 7 7.6% 1777 E. Victory 5 Ms. Susan Howard 7 7.6% 3420 S. Locust Grove 6 Mr. and Mrs. Charles Richardson 7 7.6% ,535 E. Victory 7 Mr. and Mrs. Webb 4 4.3% 1975 E. Victory 8 Mr. Charles Creech 6 6.5% 2310 E. Victory 9 Mr. Clayton Record 5 5.4% 4355 E. Victory 10 Mr. Marvin Hansen 6 6.5% 2460 E. Victory 11 Ms. Luann Kuntz 30 32.6% 460 W. Fioimm, Boise, 63704 Ms. Mary DeChambeau 2015 E. Victory Total 92 100.0% Q 0 U LL C7 Z Y a W a J a U 0 wW a 0 N co 2 Lu � T Q d Fes_- j ULL a o U rn W W U G O W LL N L a 3a W 3 N LL J a T rUR FwLO IL ,.. N m nIN V.NI!Mim OIm�V',N O'iV m M V: 'n� m V!Lo;M Lo Co V •` r'.r NiV M:. ml mgr n:m m';m mIM M.V n . �iLqIn�V V'O wIIN m:0 d O.O.o'O rINIV �f1, O'IOIN co 00 O O O,r r.!NIm�m h CO o V Q Ilan Cl) m O d ya ... y m'm:Lol COl tt M:V Lf) VI:OIn Of M�InN m V:MIm n lglm n M Q) �m l6 B n,r n'n Ir.N n co V N'm.m V n O',r m m N m Lnlr m':V m m M M;V n r O,r Lo 'c0 '!VIIV n VIV'm L- M;M'm V O m m . y Q !rl r r'N M UJ ''O'U1 to rIN.M 07 V m:m 06 U) LU Q �r r N Lf) co CD c y it Irl c c y O) (DIIVIM m N n'; mIV m OIIM VV n o n VII coC\1m co: r- m IIO m cy) mIM a p C Y m N V mlm V OIOIU)',V OIMIV N U) 01, n Cl) h'I Lo N co m m m m M:m m O.m'U) O miml' 'V r r 01,.N n N'i,n m m.M c N r a __ d C C6VIm m N NcO7'uM7 O.n r N M�LoIm r m oi'. (o.m m'ri c 4) 3 V CO M' LI) .v O C LO 0) co co m m co co Lo O l m: m n, n N V O co n m: O! N I N N Ln I! N O m N 3 d G V - U). U) o U) r, OD N 'IT10)Cl) '.m M m',m n M olo -m m n M.n m n r r-: co a olo,m n v mi,o LO co 0) 01LO r m n m m w;n nim o n Ln •� rIN m�N m IA U7 N'Oi O M M rilv.n O Ul.ch M m' IO Lf) N Z Ir M m m U) N:o r; riN n V.m M.m 00 L m Q itlr:N r r r c W � I li '. i I �', �': m a I I, I dm v: r CO V m V o N CO m n CO, n V OD m Lo m i M O m N m Lo V O 0 3 ON' O 0 01 IM O VIN N V i n M'.M V n cm,co M Cl) N M', Lo m 0 0 010 M Cn N r rINIV n rllr Lo 0ImI'N N N LD C o MINIM M� r N.0 o LL ! a pl I ! I a I'N m V r m'n.mlm Lo "t 'o O.VIr n m Lo V M o nm:m! cm NN lo(D N -V Y Y O m min V.M N r 0 mj�;m V:M m n m U) M; N',, r'IO m n'm •U) V M Q M NN'.N N NI'.N N N r, r r NN N N N, NININ r r r r d U d LL _ ! L v rn m n m m Ln v o o v N n CO Ln v Cl) o n m MIN N n Lo:m N V c >_ c o o,m mIn v MICV,r o ao r� o V r m n,m Ln M N,� o m n,co io 'T A o Y V M, N CV N N CV CV N N r N NiN N CV N N'iNto r r L d d IL m = a 0'0 M U)N'N O '': Mm m V m N r0 M'n V mm N Lo `o Y 3 N, IT CD 0) Lf) ; V. m n m N N O U) m m- O: V N N V N V r m l m n M r .�. N O o o 0 N H!,i(60 eFr ovi Lo Orr NM V m W r I\Im rh n0 c d C V r:, N'M m m - r:N'M m O_ m N m m V Cl) V Lo n m:N'j Cl) V Q Cl) Lf).n Cl) m, N,M N'm ',m n V+- n lr O O Or M Vn O V Vmlm Or' -N ' N: CV r cVmmMmNm • = wV O O 0 0,0 0 :m N_M f) O.OO O O O OrC'I cD m C : N WW rn ' N r N R jq P, m: N M V.m,O m rn . n' m m m.(D n m m N NN m m CO N r 770 m n CO LO Lo NN N m O'r:m Lo' O Lo O r mU) m m m N'.N g C d O -a O o'o r N C7i Ui :.n O t0 Lf) Lf) LO CD >. o r,r'N 6 L6-. n:oi c7 Lf) N'i {- 1 LL O vm(D r:,N;M m O fA ! r N co,V m'M n O) C (D co Ln Lo Lf) U)U) Lo Lo Lo Lo U) MM MM MMMM co co MMMM _ m C m C O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 a` 0 0 A M C o 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o G 0 0 0 6 0 0 6:6 0 6 0 0 0 6 i0 Ix w W m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O mN Lo N 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 o o L O m N U) o 0 o 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 GV .N 'Nr �i000000 r r r r r r r r r r a V N N r r r r r r r W O o'0 00 0 0o W o o'o o oloo,0 0 00 000 C Q r Ln Lf).U); Lo Lo Lo to Lo Lo Lo Lf) U) U) to r r r E o:000nn'nnnn'nnrnn `o o`_ 00010 0 o'o'Ic o o LL CL `° I i o IVIn a a y O N co 0.:r:r m r N;N N o m Nl,m M,M,V,V O N m n m O NIO rlr m V,n r N,N',N O m N m M C ;r LL l N c N o IY! m Y�Y O a N J P 11\ m N m S n L � oy m � a o a U O N 2 c a > 0 �^ y U C C C m 9 c c � c c a 9 m m O U m m - a _ m o n sm u m m y O ❑ N O 2 d Q O. M0 m m C E c E= vm, n c E w c y c E = a 0U o eL m ac70 a O o E N o m Lu 0 w N a a m N m` a `m a E a m > �9 d 0 m 0 0 `m 0 ioa aaaa m m m m m m m m m m TUSCANY DEVELOPMENT, INC. MESSINA VILLAGE #1� PREFERRED ROUTE -SEWER COST 11 -Jul -03 Prepared By: Matthew Schultz, P.E. Offsite Sewer Through Tuscany Lakes #1 Offsite Sewer Throuah Future Development Depth Depth Item Range Item Range Quantity Unit Price Total 27" Sewer 28'- 24' 60 $83.00 $4,980.00 27" Sewer 24'- 20' 614 $76.00 $46,664.00 27" Sewer 20'- 16' 3037 $63.00 $191,331.00 24" Sewer 20'- 16' 920 $52.00 $47,840.00 15" Sewer 28'- 24' 45 $52.00 $2,340.00 15" Sewer 24'- 20' 40 $46.00 $1,840.00 15" Sewer 20'- 16' 644 $38.00 $24,472.00 15" Sewer 16'- 12' 1463 $32.00 $46,816.00 15" Sewer 12'- 8' 290 $25.00 $7,250.00 48" Manhole 16'- 12' 5 $1,700.00 $8,500.00 48" Manhole 12'- 8' 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 60" Manhole 28'- 24' 1 $3,700.00 $3,700.00 60" Manhole 24'- 20' 2 $3,300.00 $6,600.00 60" Manhole 20'- 16' 19 $2;800.00 $53,200.00 36" Sleeve NA 60 $130.00 $7,800.00 AC Replace NA 30650 $1.50 $45,975.00 Gravel Access NA 1887 $8.00 $15,096.00 Subtotal $515,904.00 Offsite Sewer Throuah Future Development Subtotal $300,968.00 I F7 � Depth Item Range Quantity Unit Price Total 15" Sewer 24'- 20' 1484 $46.00 $68,264.00 15" Sewer 20'- 16' 2793 $38.00 $106,134.00 4" Sewer NA 1812 $10.50 $19,026.00 Sewer Tee NA 52 $125.00 $6,500.00 60" Manhole 24'- 20' 9 $3,300.00 $29,700.00 60" Manhole 20'- 16' 14 $2,800.00 $39,200.00 24" Sleeve NA 120 $120.00 $14,400.00 Gravel Access NA 2218 $8.00 $17,744.00 Subtotal $300,968.00 I F7 � Messina Village #1 Onsite Sewer Depth Item Ranae Quantity Unit Price Total 15" Sewer 20'- 16' 345 $38.00 $13,110.00 15" Sewer 16'- 12' 492 $32.00 $15,744.00 8" Sewer 20'- 16' 432 $28.00 $12,096.00 8" Sewer 16'- 12' 949 $24.00 $22,776.00 8" Sewer 12'- 8' 1814 $16.50 $29,931.00 8" Sewer 8'-6- 83 $14.00 $1,162.00 4" Sewer NA 2176 $10.50 $22,848.00 15" Sewer Tee NA 13 $125.00 $1,625.00 8" Sewer Tee NA 39 $39.00 $1,521.00 60" Manhole 20'- 16' 1 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 48" Manhole 20'- 16' 2 $1,900.00 $3,800.00 48" Manhole 16'- 12' 8 $1,700.00 $13,600.00 48" Manhole 12'-8' 9 $1,500.00 $13,500.00 48" Manhole 8'-6' 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 Cleanout NA 3 $550.00 $1,650.00 Subtotal $157,363.00 TOTAL $974,235.00 TUSCANY DEVELOPMENT, INC. L �l 1 , \—F MESSINA VILLAGE #1 MASTER PLAN ROUTE - SEWER COST 11 -Jul -03 Prepared By: Matthew Schultz, P.E. Offsite Sewer Through Tuscany Lakes #1 Subtotal Offsite Sewer Through Future Development $606,286.00 Depth Depth Item Range Item Range Quantity Unit Price Total 27" Sewer 28'- 24' 60 $83.00 $4,980.00 27" Sewer 24'- 20' 614 $76.00 $46,664.00 27" Sewer 20'- 16' 3522 $63.00 $221,886.00 24" Sewer 20'- 16' 920 $52.00 $47,840.00 15" Sewer 28'- 24' 45 $52.00 $2,340.00 15" Sewer 24' - 20' 40 $46.00 $1,840.00 15" Sewer 20'- 16' 644 $38.00 $24,472.00 15" Sewer 16'- 12' 1463 $32.00 $46,816.00 15" Sewer 12'- 8' 290 $25.00 $7,250.00 48" Manhole 16'- 12' 5 $1,700.00 $8,500.00 48" Manhole 12'-8' 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 60" Manhole 28'- 24' 1 $3,700.00 $3,700.00 60" Manhole 24'- 20' 2 $3,300.00 $6,600.00 60" Manhole 20'- 16' 14 $2,800.00 $39,200.00 36" Sleeve NA 60 $130.00 $7,800.00 36" Bore NA 100 $406.40 $40,640.00 AC Replace NA 58572 $1.50 $87,858.00 Gravel Access NA 800 $8.00 $6,400.00 Subtotal Offsite Sewer Through Future Development $606,286.00 Subtotal $300,968.00 Depth Item Range Quantity Unit Price Total 15" Sewer 24'- 20' 1484 $46.00 $68,264.00 15" Sewer 20'- 16' 2793 $38.00 $106,134.00 4" Sewer NA 1812 $10.50 $19,026.00 Sewer Tee NA 52 $125.00 $6,500.00 60" Manhole 24'- 20' 9 $3,300.00 $29,700.00 60" Manhole 20'- 16' 14 $2,800.00 $39,200.00 24" Sleeve NA 120 $120.00 $14,400.00 Gravel Access NA 2218 $8.00 $17,744.00 Subtotal $300,968.00 Messina Villaae #1 Onsite Sewer Tuscanv Villaae #1 Onsite Sewer Depth Item Rana e Quantity Unit Price Total 15" Sewer 20'- 16' 345 $38.00 $13,110.00 15" Sewer 16'- 12' 492 $32.00 $15,744.00 8" Sewer 20'- 16' 432 $28.00 $12,096.00 8" Sewer 16'- 12' 949 $24.00 $22,776.00 8" Sewer 12'- 8' 1814 $16.50 $29,931.00 8" Sewer 8'-6' 83 $14.00 $1,162.00 4" Sewer NA 2176 $10.50 $22,848.00 15" Sewer Tee NA 13 $125.00 $1,625.00 8" Sewer Tee NA 39 $39.00 $1,521.00 60" Manhole 20'- 16' 1 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 48" Manhole 20'- 16' 2 $1,900.00 $3,800.00 48" Manhole 16'- 12' 8 $1,700.00 $13,600.00 48" Manhole 12'- 8' 9 $1,500.00 $13,500.00 48" Manhole 81-6. 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 Cleanout NA 3 $550.00 $1,650.00 Subtotal $157,363.00 Tuscanv Villaae #1 Onsite Sewer Subtotal $55,575.00 TOTAL $1,120,192.00 Master Plan Route Preferred Route $1,120,192 $974,235 Difference $145,957 Depth Item Ranae Quantity Unit Price Total 8" Sewer 20'- 16' 200 $28.00 $5,600.00 8" Sewer 16'- 12' 950 $24.00 $22,800.00 8" Sewer 12'- 8' 950 $16.50 $15,675.00 48" Manhole 20'- 16' 1 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 48" Manhole 16'- 12' 3 $1,700.00 $5,100.00 48" Manhole 12'- 8' 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 Subtotal $55,575.00 TOTAL $1,120,192.00 Master Plan Route Preferred Route $1,120,192 $974,235 Difference $145,957 Ada County Highway District Sherry R. Huber, President Susan S. Eastlake, 1st Vice President 318 East 37th Street Dave Bivens, 2nd Vice President Garden City ID 83714-6499 David E. Wynkoop, Commissioner Phone (208) 387-6100 John S. Franden, Commissioner FAX (208) 387-6391 E-mail, tellemrmarun �;A _ July 23, 2003 To: Quasar Development, LLC 3090 Gentry Way Meridian, Idaho 83642 Subject: Sagleand Subdivision/MPP03-020/MAZ03-015 39 -lot residential subdivision Northeast corner of Locust Grove Road and Victory Road RECEIVED JUL 2 5 2003 City of Meridian City Clerk Office On July 22, 2003, the Ada County Highway District acted on your application for the above referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of approval and street improvements, which are required. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 208-387-6177. Principal Development Ar4dyst Right-of-way & Development Services Planning Division CC: Planning & Development project file City of Meridian Construction Services Drainage Utilities Brent A Claiborn Claiborn Waite Consulting LLC 1461 South Teare Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Charles H and Vickie A Richardson 1835 East Victory Road Meridian, Idaho 83642 H13,01or Ada County Highway District Mght-of-Way & Development Department Planning Review Division This application does not require Commission action and is approved at the staff level as of Tuesday July 22, 2003. Tech Review for this item was held with the applicant on Tuesday July 22, 2003. Please refer to the attachment for appeal guidelines. Staff contact Andrea N. Tuning, 208 -387 -6177 -phone, 208 -387 -6393 -fax, atuning(a.achd.ada.id us File Numbers: Sageland Subdivision / MPP03-0201 MAZ03-015 / MCUP03-036 Site address: Northeast corner of Locust Grove Road and Victory Road Owner: Charles and Vickie Richardson 1835 East Victory Road Meridian, Idaho 83642 Applicant: Quasar Development LLC 3090 Gentry Way Meridian, Idaho 83642 Representative: Claiborn Waite Consulting Brent A. Claiborn 1461 South Teare Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Application Information: The applicant has submitted an annexation, rezone, conditional use and preliminary plat application to the City of Meridian for review and approval. The applicant is proposing to construct a 39 -lot residential subdivision on 10.64 -acres. The site is currently zoned RUT and is proposed to be rezoned to R-8. The site is located on the northeast comer of Victory Road and Locust Grove Road. Acreage: 10.64 -acres Current Zoning: RUT Proposed Zoning: R-8 Buildable Lots: 39 Common Lots: 9 Vicinity Map A. Findings of Fact 1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 380 additional vehicle trips per day (10 existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. 2. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of a building permit. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. 3. Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was not required with this application. 4. Site Information: The site currently has one existing single-family dwelling. 5. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area: a. North: Sherbrook Hollow Subdivision (single-family residential) b. South: 3.89 -acres that is primarily agricultural with a single-family dwelling c. East: Sherbrook Hollow Subdivision (single-family residential) d. West: 7.583 and 7.620-acrA sites that are primarily agricultural parcels with single-family dwellings 6. Impacted Roadways Victory Road Frontage: 951 -feet Functional Street Classification: Collector Traffic count: East of Locust Grove Road was 3,555 on 4-2-02 Level of Service: Currently better than C Speed limit: 45 MPH Locust Grove Road Frontage: 534 -feet Functional Street Classification: Section Line Traffic count: South of Victory Road was 1,176 on 4-2-02 North of Victory Road was 1,363 on 3-19-02 Level of Service: Currently better than C Speed limit: 40 MPH 7. Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site Victory Road is currently improved with 24raffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. Locust Grove Road is currently improved with 2 -traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. 8. Existing Right -of -Way Victory Road currently has a total of 50 -feet of right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline). Locust Grove Road has a total of 50 -feet of right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline). 9. Existing Access to the Site The site currently takes access to Victory Road from an existing 50 -foot wide driveway that intersects Victory Road approximately 470 -feet east of Locust Grove Road. 2 10. Site History The District has not previously reviewed a development application for this site. It. Capital Improvements Plan/Five Year Work Program Victory Road is not scheduled within the District's Five Year Work Program but is identified as item number 15 within the Capital Improvements Plan. In the Capital Improvements Plan, Victory Road is anticipated to be a 3 -lanes roadway with curb, gutter and sidewalk within 70 -feet of right-of-way. Locust Grove Road is not included within the District's Five Year Work Program or the Capital Improvements Plan. B. Findings for Consideration Right -of -Way and Sidewalk District policy requires 70 -feet of right-of-way on collector roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of- way width allows for the construction of a 3 -lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5 -foot wide detached sidewalks and bike lanes. District policy 7204.8 requires 90 -feet of right-of-way (45 -feet from centerline) for urban section line roads within a City's urban service programming area. Victory Road Victory Road is not listed as a proposed project in the District's currently adopted Five -Year Work Program, but is in the currently adopted 20 -year Capital Improvements Plan. As such, the applicant may receive reimbursement for dedicated right-of-way from available collected impact fees. The Board of Commissioners authorizes the expenditure of available collected impact fees for the purchase of right-of-way dedicated by the applicant, with the applicant constructing a sidewalk as described below. However, if funds cannot be secured, the applicant shall do one of the following: a. Dedicate by donation (or through a development offset agreement whereby the applicant is reimbursed from impact fees to be collected solely from the applicant's specific development project) a total of 35 -feet of right-of-way from centerline (an additional 10 -feet of right-of-way) along Victory Road, and construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victory Road, located a minimum of 28 -feet from the centerline of the right-of-way. b. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victory Road, located a minimum of 28 -feet from the centerline of the right-of-way, in an easement provided to the District. c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victory Road, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way. Accomplish all necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities. Locust Grove Road Typically, right-of-way for section line roads that are located outside of a City's area of impact for developments with lots that are less than 1 -acre is 90 -feet (45 -feet from centerline). Due to the fact that Locust Grove is not within the District's Capital Improvements Plan, staff is recommending that the applicant dedicate 70 -feet of right-of-way (35 -feet from centeriine). This would allow for 3 -traffic lanes, a bike lane, curb, gutter and sidewalk. 3 Locust Grove Road is not listed as a proposed project in the District's currently adopted Five -Year Work Program or in the currently adopted 20 -year Capital Improvements Plan. As such, the applicant cannot receive reimbursement for dedicated right-of-way from available collected impact fees. The applicant shall do one of the following: a. Dedicate by donation a total of 35 -feet from centerline (an additional 10 -feet) of right-of-way along Locust Grove Road, and construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove Road, located a minimum of 28 -feet from the centerline of the right-of-way. b. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove Road, located a minimum of 28 -feet from the centerline of the right-of-way, in an easement provided to the District. c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove Road, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way. Accomplish all necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities. 2. Roadway Offsets District policy 7204.11.6, requires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 300 -feet from an arterial roadway (measured centerline to centerline). The applicant is proposing to construct West Sagemoor Street to intersect Victory Road approximately 185 -feet west of the east property line. This roadway location meets District policy and should be approved with this application. The applicant is proposing to construct West Sagemoor Street to intersect Locust Grove Road approximately 350 -feet north of Victory Road. This roadway location meets District policy and should be approved with this application. 3. Street Sections District policy 7204.4.3 states that a developer may construct a local urban residential street with a reduced width of 29 -feet from back of curb to back of curb with curb, gutter and sidewalk. Although some parking is allowed, the conditions for approval must be met. • Traffic volumes on the street are not forecast to exceed 1,000 vehicle trips per day. • There must be no possibility that the street will be extended in the near future, or that another street may connect to it in a manner that would allow more than 1,000 vehicle trips per day. • The developer is required to install "no parking signs" on one side of the street, as specified by the District. • Vertical curbs with attached 5 -foot concrete sidewalks or rolled curbs with 4 -foot minimum detached sidewalks and 5 -foot minimum wide planter strips are required. District policy 7204.4.1 states that right-of-way widths for all streets and highways shall not be less than 50 -feet wide except in unusual cases. Any request to the District to approve a street with a right-of-way width less than 50 must prove by clear convincing evidence that the facts and circumstances of the development warrant a finding of an exceptional case. The applicant must show that the roadway will be used for residential purposes, there will be no possibility that the street will be extended in the near future and the traffic volumes on the street are not forecast to exceed 200 vehicles per day. a District policy7240.4.3 allows a developer to construct a local urban residential street with a reduced width of 29 -feet from back -of -curb to back -of -curb with curb, gutter and sidewalk. Policy restricts parking on reduced street sections. The applicant is proposing to construct West Sagemoor Street as a 29 -foot street section with curb, gutter and detached 5 -foot concrete sidewalk with parking on one side of the roadway within 50 -feet of right-of-way. This street section meets District policy and should be approved with this application. The applicant is proposing to construct South Savia Place as a 29 -foot street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk within 42 -feet of right-of-way. This street section meets District policy and should be approved with this application. 4. Private Road District policy 7207.9.3 restricts industrial driveways to a maximum width of 40 -feet. Most industrial driveways will be constructed as curb -cut type facilities if located on local streets. Curb return type driveways with 15 -foot radii will be required for driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways. District policy 7205.6, other jurisdictions in Ada County establish the requirements for private streets. The District retains authority and will review the proposed intersection of a private and public street for compliance with District intersection policies and standards. If the City of Meridian approves the private road, the applicant shall be required to pave the private roadway a minimum of 20 to 24 -feet wide and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of West Sagemoor Drive and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot curb radii abutting the existing roadway edge. The applicant should provide a plan showing how the private road grade meets the public road. District Policy requires a design approach speed of 20 MPH and a maximum intersection approach grade of 2% for at least 40 -feet. Street name and stop signs are required for the private road. The signs may be ordered through the District. Verification of the correct, approved name of the road is required. ACHD does not make any assurances that the private road, which is a part of this application, will be accepted as a public road if such a request is made in the future. Substantial redesign and reconstruction costs may be necessary in order to qualify this road for public ownership and maintenance. The following requirements must be met if the applicant wishes to dedicate the roadway to ACHD: • Dedicate a minimum of 50 -feet of right-of-way for the road. • Construct the roadway to the minimum ACHD requirements. The applicant is proposing to construct a private road, South Sagemoor Lane, to intersect West Sagemoor Drive approximately 215 -feet west of West Sagemoor Street. This private roadway location meets District policy and should be approved with this application. In order to separate the private road from the public right-of-way and limit cut through traffic, the applicant should terminate the private road at the northern property line of the proposed landscape buffer. The applicant should also install traffic bollards to minimize the connection. 5. Turnarounds District policy 7205.2.1 requires turnarounds to be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45 -feet. The applicant should also be required to provide a minimum of a 29 -foot street section on either side of any proposed center islands within the turnarounds. The medians should be constructed a minimum of 4 -feet wide to total a minimum of a 100 -square foot area. The applicant is proposing to construct a cul-de-sac turnaround without a center island at the terminus of South Savia Place. The applicant should provide a minimum turning radius of 45 -feet. 6. Other Access Victory Road and Locust Grove Road are classified roadways. Other than the access points that are specifically approved with this application, direct lot access to Locust Grove Road and Victory Road are prohibited. Notes of the lot access restrictions should be noted on the final plat. C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval The Board of Commissioners authorizes the expenditure of available collected impact fees for the purchase of right-of-way dedicated by the applicant, with the applicant constructing a sidewalk as described below. However, if funds cannot be secured, the applicant shall do one of the following: a. Dedicate by donation (or through a development offset agreement whereby the applicant is reimbursed from impact fees to be collected solely from the applicant's specific development project) a total of 35 -feet of right-of-way from centerline (an additional 10 -feet of right-of-way) along Victory Road, and construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victory Road, located a minimum of 28 -feet from the centerline of the right-of-way. b. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victory Road, located a minimum of 28 -feet from the centerline of the right-of-way, in an easement provided to the District. c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victory Road, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way. Accomplish all necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities. 2. The applicant shall do one of the following: a. Dedicate by donation a total of 35 -feet from centerline (an additional 10 -feet) of right-of-way along Locust Grove Road, and construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove Road, located a minimum of 28 -feet from the centerline of the right-of-way. b. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove Road, located a minimum of 28 -feet from the centerline of the right-of-way, in an easement provided to the District. c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove Road, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way. Accomplish all necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities. 3. Construct West Sagemoor Street to intersect Victory Road approximately 185 -feet west of the east property line, as proposed. 4. Construct West Sagemoor Street to intersect Locust Grove Road approximately 350 -feet north of Victory Road, as proposed. 5. Construct West Sagemoor Street as a 29 -foot street section with curb, gutter and detached 5 -foot concrete sidewalk with parking on one side of the roadway within 50 -feet of right-of-way, as proposed. Parking will be restricted on one side of the roadway and adequate signage will be required. 0 6. Construct South Savia Place as a 29 -foot street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk within 42 -feet of right-of-way, a proposed. Parking will be restricted on one side of the roadway and adequate signage will be required. Construct a private road, South Sagemoor Lane, to intesect West Sagemoor Drive approximately 215 -feet west of West Sagemoor Street. Terminate the private road at the northern property line of the proposed landscape buffer and install traffic bollards to minimize the connection. 8. If the City of Meridian approves the private road, pave the private roadway a minimum of 20 to 24 -feet wide and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of West Sagemoor Drive and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot curb radii abutting the existing roadway edge. Provide a plan showing how the private road grade meets the public road. Street name and stop signs are required for the private road. Verification of the correct, approved name of the road is required. 9. Construct a cul-de-sac turnaround without a center island at the terminus of South Savia Place. Provide a minimum turning radius of 45 -feet for the turnaround. 10. Victory Road and Locust Grove Road are classified roadways. Other than the access points that are specifically approved with this application, direct lot access to Locust Grove Road and Victory Road are prohibited. Notes of the lot access restrictions are required on the final plat. 11. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. D. Standard Conditions of Approval Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way. 2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 6. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 7. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7 8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #197, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to e;hange the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. E. Conclusions of Law The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. Appeal Guidelines 0 Request for Appeal of Staff Decision Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual. a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in supliort of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply, and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. e • EO y ' XL 6IBBtl ON HfFEE;Ell oa i flail, .' •Aoo Oa �p � ry I e o � ,1 of F � ury a /)� July 31, 2003 City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 2235 NW a Street Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Sageland Planned Development RECEIVED AUG - 4 2003 City Of Meridian City Clerk Office I will be unable to attend the August 21" public hearing but wanted to respond to the proposed Sageland Development at the corner of Victory & Locust Grove. Although I would support the development of this piece of property, I'm apposed to the Sageland Development as it is currently platted. In my opinion the lots are too small. I'd like to suggest the Planning & Zoning Commission request a redraft of the plat of the entire 10.64 acres to reduce the total # of lots on this property to under 30. Sincerely, Todd E. Youren 15 July, 2003 William Berg City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Ave. - MOPi ;. D- 8364 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 Phones: Area Cade 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 RECEIVED RE: AZ 03-015 & PP 03-020 Sageland Planned Development JUL 2 12003 City Of Meridian Dear Will: laity Clerk Office Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the above referenced application for annexation and zoning. The District does require a Land Use Application be filed for review prior to final platting for PP 03-020. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. The District's Eight Mile Lateral courses along the east and north boundary, This easement must be protected and any encroachment without a signed License Agreement and approved plan, before any construction is started, is unacceptable. All municipal surface drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. Please contact Donna Moore at 466-7861 for further information. The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. Thank you, dwj e,4� Bill Henson, Asst. Water Superintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District BH/dbg cc: Water Superintendent File - Office/Shop Rider 4 APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 ) 05 2� )\\ $ �a %gyp ) k] �I{ E_ E A2 kD \�\ $0 22 E5 .%©` [_§§ o;.( >Jƒw a m&ES aof� cc < CL #\ EU $s77 (� of Eƒ)k co0_- 05Ea) 0 .#�) z&- ]7t 2 0. �Ez2 0u CL k2 7 0CL §au w«;6 �. 2 ]/ C14 f/ cm k� Ub � .>Vlj+odA.,,� MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy de Weerd William L. M. Nary Cherie McCandless Keith Bird CITY OF tl IDAHO LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 466-9272 - FAX 466-4405 PARKS & RECREATION (208) 888-3579 - Fax 898-5501 PUBLIC WORKS (208) 898-5500 - Fax 887-1297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 PLANNING & ZONING (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: August 14, 2003 Transmittal Date: July 8, 2003 Hearing Date: August 21, 2003 File No:: AZ 03-015 Request: Annexation and Zoning of 9.8 acres from RUT to R-8 zones Sageland Planned Development By: Quasar Development, LLC Location of Property or Project: northeast comer of South Locust Grove Road David Zaremba, P/Z (No vAR, vac, FP) Jerry Centers, P/Z (No vAR, vAc, FP) Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Robert Come, Mayor Bill Nary, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C erie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP) Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney Your City Engineer _ City Planner Parks Department RECEIVED JUL { 12003 City of Meridian City Clerk Office Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FPiPP a*) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP onry) U.S. West (FPiPP only) Intermountain Gas (FP)PPonly) Bureau of Reclamation (FPrPP oW) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County (Annexation only) Ada County Land Records (FPA'Ponly) Meridian Development Corporation Preservation Commission 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE - MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 - (208) 888-4433 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 - Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 - Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 11A" MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy de Weerd William L. M. Nary Cherie McCandless Keith Bird OfCITY OF tI IDAHO LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 466-9272 • FAX 466-4405 PARKS & RECREATION (208) 888-3579 • Fax 898-5501 PUBLIC WORKS (208) 898-5500 • Fax 887-1297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING & ZONING (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: August 14, 2003 Transmittal Date: July 8, 2003 Hearing Date: August 21, 2003 File No.: AZ 03-015 Request: Annexation and Zoning of 9.8 acres from RUT to R-8 zones for proposed Planned By: Quasar D Location of Property or LLC comer David Zaremba, P/Z (No vAR, vac, FP) Jerry Centers, PIZ pyo VAR, VAC, FP) Leslie Mathes, PIZ ovo vAR, VAC, FP) Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Keith Borup, P/Z pyo vAR, vAc, FP) Robert Come, Mayor Bill Nary, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, CIC Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (No vAR, vAc, Fp) Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer Pay Planner Parks Department Your Concise Remarks: Meridian School District (No Fp) Meridian Post Office (FP/Fponly) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian brig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP only) U.S. West (FP/PFonry) - Intermountain Gas (FP/PPonly) Bureau of Reclamation (FP/AP only) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County (Annexation only) Ada County Land Records (FF/FPonly) Meridian Development Corporation Historical Preservation Commission RECEIVED JUL 1 52003 City Of Meridian City Clerk Office 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 • Human Resources Fax (208) 8848723 • Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE COUNCIL. MEMBERS WILLIAM L.M. NARY KEITH BIRD TAMMY DE WEERD CHERLE MCCANDLESS RURAL FIRE COMMISSIONERS RICHARD GREENE TERRY LEIGHTON STEVE ELLIOTT l 1 cY OF _ �✓Yl �Y1t 1G� n V u 3i�Hh 4— d: re`l9 MERIDIAN CITY/RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT CHIEF KEN W. BOWERS DEPUTY CHIEF - FIRE PREVENTION JOSEPH SILVA DEPUTY CHIEF - TRAINING BILL JOHNSON 590 F.,ast Franklin Road Meridian, 1D 43642 (208) 888-1234 Fax (208) 895-0390 August 11, 2003 AUG 1 12003 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLFRK 0FFICF TO: Mayor, City Council and the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Joseph Silva, Deputy Chief, Fire Prevention SUBJECT: Sageland Subdivision AZ 03-015, CUP 03-036, PP 03-020 The following will be the requirements and/or concerns to provide minimum levels of fire protection for the proposed project: 1. The project which comprised of single family dwellings will require a fire -flow of 1,000 gallons per minute available for duration of 2 hours to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 400' apart. 1997 UFC Appendix I1I-A 2. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Water Department. 3. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department. The proposed fire hydrant locations will be submitted to the Public Works for plan review. 4. All roads and fire lanes shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside. 5. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required before combustible construction begins. UFC 901.4.2 & 901.3 The proposed 39 -lot subdivision with an estimated 2.9 residents per household would have a total estimated population of I I3residents at build out. According to a report completed by Fire & Emergency Services Consulting Group in February of 2000 our requests for service are projected to reach 2800 in the year 2005 and 3800 by the year 2010, this is up from 2069 responses in the year 2000. 7. The proposed project lies outside the five-minute response zone goal. Achievement of this goal is subject to budgetary constraints and is intended to enhance the probability of a favorable outcome on a request for Basic Life Support. The budget constraints are typically defined as capital outlay for facilities that are located within 1.5 miles from a given location and sufficient operational funds to staff the facilities.