Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutACHD Comments:~, ~`~' ~"'~` ~H ~"' Ada County Highway District Sherry R_ Huber. President 318 East 37th Street Susan S. Eastlake, 1st Vice President Dave Bivens, 2nd Vice President David E. Wynkoop, Commissioner John S. Franden, Commissioner Garden CityID 83714-6499 Phone (208) 387-6100 FAX !2081387-6391 E-mail: TO: Tuscany Development, Inc. P.O. Box 344 Meridian, ID 83680 August 7, 2003 FROM: Craig Hood Senior Development Analyst Planning & Development Department SUBJECT: MPP03-O15/MCUP03-029/MAZ03-014 Tuscany Village Subdivision Locust Grove Road & Victory Road DECEIVED AUG 1 1 2003 City Of Meridian City Clerk Office On August 6, 2003 the Ada County Highway District Board of Commissioners acted on your application for the above referenced project. The attached staff report lists conditions of approval and street improvements, which are required. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact staff at (208) 387-6170. Craig H~df Senior Developme Analyst ACHD Planning & Development Cc: Planning & Development/chron/project file City of Meridian Construction Services Drainage Briggs Engineering, Inc., C/O Kent Brown, 1800 W. Overland Road, Boise, ID 83705 ~~ *f~~ Ada County Highway District Right-oj-Way cYc Development Department Planning Review Division This application requires Commission action because of the number of fries the development is expected to generate. This item was heard on regular agenda on August 6, 2003 at 12:00 pm (noon). Tech Review for fhis item was held with the applicant on July 18, 2003. Please refer to Attachment 3 for request for reconsideration guidelines. Staff contact: Craig Hood, 387-6174, choodCa.achd.ada.id.us File Numbers: MPP03-015, MCUP03-029, MAZ03-014, Tuscany Village Subdivision Site Address: Southwest corner of Victory Road & Locust Grove Road Owner/Applicant: Tuscany Development, Inc. P.O. Box 344 Meridian, ID 83680 Representative: Briggs Engineering, Inc. 1800 W. Overland Road Boise, ID 83705 Application Information The applicant is requesting preliminary plat, conditional use, annexation and rezone approval from the City of Meridian to subdivide 33.3-acres of currently zoned RUT properly into 136 residential lots, 10 common lots and 4 future right-of-way lots within the proposed R-8 zone. The site is located on the south side of Victory Road and on the west side of Locust Grove Road, approximately 550-feet west of Locust Grove Road and 900-feet south of Victory Road. Acreage: Current zoning: Proposed zoning: Proposed buildable lots: Proposed common lots: Proposed future right-of-way lots Vicinity Map 33.3-acres RUT R-8/PUD 136 10 4 A. Findings of Fact Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 1,300 additional vehicle trips per day based on the traffic study submitted by Dobie Engineering, Inc (see below). 2. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building permit(s) on the site. The fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance in effect at the time the .District receives a development application or building permit submittal. 3. Traffic Impact Study: The following are the principal findings and recommendations of the Traffic Impact Study for the Tuscany Village Development located in the Meridian Area of Impact: 1. The proposed development is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT) of 1,300 vehicles per day (vpd), of which the peak hour traffic (PHT) is projected to be 100 vehicles per hour (vph) in the AM peak and 135 vehicles per hour in the PM peak. The project is scheduled to be developed in phases and is now estimated to be fully developed by the year 2005. 2. The intersection of Locust GroveNictory Road is currently an all-way stop-controlled intersection without auxiliary lanes on the approaches. The intersection is currently operating at a LOS A in the AM peak hour and a LOS B in the PM peak. The background LOS projections for 2005 are estimated to operate at a LOS C in the AM Peak and a LOS F in the PM peak under the current lane geometry. With the addition of left-turn lanes on all four approaches the intersection is projected to operate at a LOS B in the AM peak and LOS C in the PM peak for the same background conditions. With the addition of site traffic this intersection is projected to operate at a LOS C in the AM peak and a LOS D in the PM peak in the year 2005 with the addition of the left turn lanes. 3. The need for auxiliary lanes improvements at the project entrances was evaluated for this development. The need for a WB left-turn lane on Victory Road at the site entrance is warranted. The access site to the development on Locust Grove Road does not meet the warrant for an auxiliary lane. Locust ~ S/ Victory ~ 1176 Victor ~ W/Locust 4009 Victory ~ E/Locust ~ 3555 4200 ~ N/A 9000 ~ 12,100 7,ZOQ ~ 9400 14,000 ~ 2-Lace Section Line 9500 ~ 2-Lane Collector 9100 ~ 2-Lane Collector recent traffic counts 4. Site Information: The site is currently being used for agricultural purposes. 5. Description of AdjacenUSurrounding Area: a. North: Single-family homes on 4 to 5-acre lots (Kachina Estates Subdivision) b. South: Single-family home/Agricultural land c. East: Single-family homes on Agricultural parcels d. West: Single-family home/Agricultural land 6. Impacted Roadways: Victory Road: Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: Nearest intersection: Locust Grove Road: Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: Nearest intersection: 733-feet Collector 4,009 east of SH 69 on 5-15-02 LOS "C" or better 50 MPH Locust Grove Road, astop-controlled intersection 320-feet Section Line Road 1,176 south of Victory Road on 4-2-02 1,363 north of Victory Road on 3-19-02 LOS `C" or better 50 MPH Victory Road, astop-controlled intersection 7. Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site Victory Road is currently improved with 2-lanes (no center turn lane), no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. Locust Grove Road is currently improved with 2-lanes (no center turn lane), no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. 8. Existing Right-of-Way There is currently 50-feet of right-of--way (25-feet from centerline) for Victory Road abutting the site. There is currently 50-feet of right-of-way (25-feet from centerline) for Locust Grove Road abutting the site. 9. Existing Access to the Site Access to the site is currently not delineated. 10. Site History ACHD Planning and Development Review staff has not reviewed this site in the recent past. 11. Five Year Work Program/Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) There are no roadways, bridges or intersections in the general vicinity of this project that are currently in the District's Five Year Work Program. Victory Road, from Meridian Road to Eagle Road, is currently in the CIP for roadway improvements (11-15 years out). B. Findings for Consideration Right-of-Way & Sidewalk The District will normally make compensation for additional right-of-way dedicated beyond the existing right-of-way along collectors and arterials listed as impact fee eligible in the adopted Capital Improvements Plan using available impact fee revenue in the Impact Fee Service Area. Victory Road District policy requires 70-feet of right-of-way on collector roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of- way width allows for the construction of a 3-lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot wide detached sidewalks and bike lanes. District policy 7204.6.5 requires 5-foot wide (minimum) concrete sidewalk on all collector roadways. A parkway strip at least 5-feet wide is required between the back-of-curb and the street edge of a new 5-foot wide sidewalk. This section of Victory Road is not listed as a proposed project in the District's currently adopted Five Year Work Program, but is currently in the adopted 20-year Capital Improvements Program. However, the applicant may receive reimbursement for dedicated right-of-way from available collected impact fees, only if the roadway is listed in the current C1P at the time of plan/plat approval. The ACRD Board of Commissioners authorizes the expenditure of available collected impact fees for the purchase ofright-of--way dedicated by the applicant, with the applicant constructing a sidewalk as described below. However, if funds cannot be secured, the applicant shall do one of the following: Dedicate by donation (or through a development offset agreement whereby the applicant is reimbursed from impact fees to be collected solely from the applicant's specific development project (when applicable)) an additional 10-feet of right-of-way along Victory Road (35-feet total from centerline), and construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victory Road in its ultimate location (minimum 28-feet from centerline). Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. The applicant should provide the District with an easement for any portion of the sidewalk that is not located within the right-of-way. The applicant should also be required to obtain a license agreement for any landscaping located in the Victory Road right-of-way. ii. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victory Road in its ultimate location. The sidewalk should be located no closer than 28-feet from the centerline of the right-of-way. Provide the District with an easement for any portion of the sidewalk that is not located within the right-of-way. iii. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victory Road, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way (if feasihle). Accomplish all necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities. Locust Grove Road District policy 7201.1.5 states that section line roads are future transportation corridors. They will ultimately function as a collector or arterial streets. Direct lot access to these roads will be restricted. Additional right-of-way and pavement widening may be required, and left turn bays may be required when new streets intersect section line roads. See Sections 7204.7.2 and Figure 72-F8 for additional information. District policy 7204.7.2 requires 5-foot wide (minimum) concrete sidewalk on all arterial roadways. A parkway strip at least 5-feet wide is required between the back-of-curb and the street edge of a new 5-foot wide sidewalk. 4 This section of Locust Grove Road is not lisfed in the adopfed Capital Improvements Plan; therefore, impact fees cannot be used to purchase theright-of-way abutting the site. Right-of-way dedication is not required with this application. If the applicant chooses to dedicate the right-of--way, ACRD will not provide compensation. The applicant should do one of the foNowing: iv. Dedicate by donation an additional 10-feet of right-of--way along Locust Grove Road (35-feet total from centerline), and construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove Road in its ultimate location (minimum 28-feet from centerline). Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. The applicant should provide the District with an easement for any portion of the sidewalk that is not located within the right-of-way. The applicant should also be required to obtain a license agreement for any landscaping located in the Locust Grove Road right-of-way. v. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove Road in its ultimate location. The sidewalk should be located no closer than 28-feet from the centerline of the right-of-way. Provide the District with an easement for any portion of the sidewalk that is not located within the right-of-way. vi. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove Road, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way (if feasible). Accomplish all necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities. 2. Access Points Direct access to arterials and collectors is normally restricted (District policy 7207.8). Location District policy 7204.11.5 restricts the location of a local street along a collector to be in alignment with or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any other street. District policy 7204.11.5 restricts the location of a local street along an arterial to be in alignment with or offset a minimum of 300-feet from any other street. District policy 72-F5, requires driveways located on collector or arterial roadways with a speed limit of 50 MPH to align or offset a minimum of 255-feet from any existing or proposed driveway. Ascaino Avenue The applicant is proposing to construct Ascaino Avenue approximately 800-feet west (measured centerline-to-centerline) of Locust Grove Road and in alignment with an existing driveway on the north side of Victory Road. The proposed location of Ascaino Avenue meets District policy and should be approved with this application. Cecina Street The applicant is proposing to construct Cecina Street approximately 1,175-feet south (measured centerline-to-centerline) of Victory Road and in alignment with an existing driveway on the east side of Locust Grove Road. The proposed location of Cecina Street meets District policy and should be approved wrfh this application. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Victory Road and Locust Grove Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. 5 3. Internal Streets Location District policy 7204.11.6, requires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 125-feet from another local roadway (measured centerline to centerline). The locations of the proposed internal roadways meet District policy for location and should be approved with this application. Right-of-Way/Street Section District policy 7204.4.1 and Figure 72-F1A require 50-feet of right-of-way on local streets. This right- of-way allows for the construction of a 2-lane roadway with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks. District policy 7204.4.2 states that developments with buildable lots that are less than 1- acre in size will typically provide streets having a minimum pavement width of 32-feet with curb, gutter and sidewalks. The total street width shall be 36-feet from back-of-curb to back-of-curb. Variations of this width may be allowed, depending on traffic volumes forecast to be generated by the development. Concrete sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5-feet in width unless they are separated from the curb 5-feet or more in which case the sidewalk shall be a minimum of 4-feet in width. The applicant is proposing to construct all of the internal roadways: Italy Street, Siena Street, Cecina Street, Arezzo Avenue, Murlo Avenue, Sarteano Avenue, Pienza Street and Ascaino Avenue as 36- foot street sections with curb, gutter and 4-foot wide detached concrete sidewalks, with 50-feet of right-of-way. Unless otherwise approved by District staff, the applicant should construct all of the internal roadways as 36-foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 4-foot wide detached concrete sidewalks (separated from the curb a minimum of 5-feef), within 50-feet of right-of-way as proposed. The applicant should provide the District with an easement for the portions of the detached sidewalks that are not located within the right-of-way. 4. Stub Streets District policy 7203.5.1 and 7205.5 require stub streets to provide intro-neighborhood circulation and to provide access to adjoining parcels. Connectivity limits the vehicle miles traveled, minimizes the number of vehicles that utilize arterial and collector roadways for short distances and provides multiple access points for emergency vehicles. District policy also requires temporary turnarounds with a temporary easement provided to the District at the end of stub streets that are greater than 150-feet in length with a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". A stub street shall be designed to slope towards the street intersection and drain surface water toward that intersection, unless a satisfactory storm drain system is installed. The applicant is proposing to construct two (2) stub streets to abutting parcels. The first stub, Italy Street, is located approximately 650-feet south of Victory Road and is stubbed to one of the two properties this site abuts to the west. Staff is supportive of the proposed Italy Street stub. The second stub, Arezzo Avenue, is located approximately 600-feet west of Locust Grove Road and is stubbed to one of the two properties this site abuts to the south. Staff is supportive of the proposed Arezzo Avenue stub. In order to establish good traffic circulation, and to comply with District policy, Italy Street and Arezzo Avenue should be extended to the west and south property lines, as proposed. The applicant should construct Italy Street to the west properly line and install a sign at the end of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED 1N THE FUTURE". The applicant should construct Arezzo Avenue to the south property line and install a sign at the end of the roadway stating fhat, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub streets with District staff. 6 Staff Analysis and Recommendation: There is a 2.83-acre parcel (Parcel # 51 1 30 1 20700) directly to the west of the proposed subdivision. Staff believes that the 2.83-acre parcel (currently a grange hall) may be developed into a higher use in the future. If a stub street is not provided from this parcel to Parcel #S1130120700, future residents/tenants in the subject development and in the 2.83-acre parcel may have to enter onto the collector roadway (Victory Road) to get between the developments. In order to establish good traffic circulation and in accordance with District policy, staff recommends that the Commission require the applicant to provide a stub street to Parcel # S1130120700 to the west. Said stub street should either be in alignment with Pienza Street or offset from Pienza Street a minimum of 125-feet (measured centerline to centerline). On August 6, 2003, the ACHD Board of Commissioners voted to require the applicant to stub to Parcel #51130120700 as well as Parcel #S113012110, as staff recommended. 5. Knuckles District policy District policy 7202.7 and 7207.5 and the local Fire District standards require an island within a knuckle to be constructed with the island being a minimum of 4-feet wide with a minimum area of 100-square feet and designed to safely channel traffic. The roadway around the traffic island should maintain a minimum of a 29-foot street section. The applicant is proposing to construct three knuckles within the subdivision. Staff is supportive of the location of the proposed knuckles. The Tina! design of any knuckles with islands should be reviewed and approved by ACHD's Planning and Development staff. 6. Islands District policy 7202.7 and 7207.5 requires any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat to be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. The applicant is proposing to construct islands within the right-of--way of Ascaino Avenue and Cecina Street. In accordance with District policy, if islands are constructed, the applicant should provide a minimum clear distance of 21-feet (measured back-of--curb to back-of-curb) on both sides of the island. Auxiliary Lanes If traffic volumes from a proposed development warrant turn lanes into or out of the site, the applicant may be required to dedicate additional right-of-way to accommodate the improvements. The applicant will not be compensated by ACHD for the dedication of additional right-of-way and pavement widening (District policy 7204.8). When platting along functionally classified roadways, the applicant should allow for sufficient right-of--way at the intersections that have been identified as needing turn lanes, as determined in the submitted traffic impact study. District policy 3004.1 and AASHTO Guidelines require tapers to be constructed on a varying basis contingent upon the posted speed limit. The need for auxiliary lane improvements at the project entrances was evaluated for this development. As determined in the submitted traffic impact study. the need for a WB left-turn lane on Victory Road at the site entrance (Ascaino Avenue) is warranted. The applicant may choose to install the auxiliary turn lane either when the phase abutting the necessary auxiliary lane is being built, or when the warrant is met. !f the later option is chosen, the necessary right-of-way needed to construct any required auxiliary lane should be dedicated with the 7 abutting final plat phase and constructed when the warrant is met. The necessify for auxiliary lane (warrants) will need fo be evaluated by the District as each phase of the final plat is submitted. The applicant should coordinate the design/taper of the required westbound left turn lane on Victory Road at Ascaino Avenue with Disfrict staff. C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval This section of Victory Road is not listed as a proposed project in the District's currently adopted Five Year Work Program, but is in the currently adopted 20-year Capital Improvements Program. However, the applicant may receive reimbursement for dedicated right-of--way from available collected impact fees, only if the roadway is listed in the current CIP at the time of plan/plat approval. The ACHD Board of Commissioners authorizes the expenditure of available collected impact fees for the purchase of right-of-way dedicated by the applicant, with the applicant constructing a sidewalk as described below. However, if funds cannot be secured, the applicant shall do one of the following: Dedicate by donation (or through a development offset agreement whereby the applicant is reimbursed from impact fees to be collected solely from the applicant's specific development project) an additional 10-feet of right-of-way along Victory Road (35-feet total from centerline), and construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victory Road in its ultimate location (minimum 28-feet from centerline). Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. The applicant should provide the District with an easement for any portion of the sidewalk that is not located within the right-of-way. The applicant should also be required to obtain a license agreement for any landscaping located in the Victory Road right-of-way. ii. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victory Road in its ultimate location. The sidewalk should be located no closer than 28-feet from the centerline of the right-of-way. Provide the District with an easement for any portion of the sidewalk that is not located within the right-of-way. iii. Do not dedicate additional right-of--way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victory Road, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way (if feasible). Accomplish all necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities. 2. This section of Locust Grove Road is not listed in the adopted Capital Improvements Plan; therefore, impact fees cannot be used to purchase the right-of-way abutting the site. Right-of- way dedication is not required with this application. If the applicant chooses to dedicate the right-of-way, ACHD will not provide compensation. The applicant shall do one of the following: Dedicate by donation an additional 10-feet of right-of-way along Locust Grove Road (35-feet total from centerline), and construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove Road in its ultimate location (minimum 28-feet from centerline). Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. The applicant should provide the District with an easement for any portion of the sidewalk that is not located within the right-of-way. The applicant should also be required to obtain a license agreement for any landscaping located in the Locust Grove Road right-of-way. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove Road in its ultimate location. The sidewalk should be located no closer than 28-feet from the centerline of the right-of-way. Provide the District with an easement for any portion of the sidewalk that is not located within the right-of--way. iii. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove Road, located at the back edge of the existing right-of- way (if feasible). Accomplish all necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities. 3. Construct a separate westbound left-tum lane on Victory Road at Ascaino Avenue. The applicant may choose to install the auxiliary turn lane either when the phase abutting the subject auxiliary lane is being built, or when the warrant is met. If the later option is chosen, the necessary right-of-way needed to construct the subject auxiliary lane shall be dedicated with the abutting final plat phase and constructed when the warrant is met. The necessity for auxiliary lane construction (warrants) will be evaluated as each phase (final plat) is submitted. Coordinate the final design of the turn lane and taper with District staff. 4. Construct Ascaino Avenue to intersect Victory Road approximately 800-feet west of Locust Grove Road and in alignment with the existing driveway on the north side of Victory Road, as proposed. The street shall be constructed with a 36-foot street section within 50-feet of right- of-way with curb, gutter and concrete sidewalks. Ascaino Avenue shall be constructed with 21-foot street sections on either side of the proposed center median. 5. Construct Cecina Street to intersect Locust Grove Road approximately 1,175-feet south of Victory Road and in alignment with the existing driveway on the south side of Locust Grove Road, as proposed. The street shall be constructed with a 36-foot street section within 50- feet of right-of-way with curb, gutter and concrete sidewalks. Cecina Street shall be constructed with 21-foot street sections on either side of the proposed center median. 6. Unless otherwise approved by District staff, the applicant shall construct all of the internal roadways; Italy Street, Siena Street, Cecina Street, Arezzo Avenue, Murlo Avenue, Sarteano Avenue and Pienza Street as 36-foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 4-foot wide detached concrete sidewalks (separated from the curb a minimum of 5-feet), within 50-feet of right-of-way as proposed. The applicant shall provide the District with an easement for the portions of the sidewalks that are not located within the right-of-way. Construct Italy Street to the west property line, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. 9 8. Construct Arezzo Avenue to the south property line, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, `THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE" Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. 9. Construct a stub street to Parcel # S1130120700 to the west. Said stub street shall either be in alignment with Pienza Street or offset from Pienza Street a minimum of 125-feet (measured centerline to centerline). Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. 10. Any landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat shall be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this shall be required on the final plat. 11. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Victory Road and Locust Grove Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat(s). 12. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. D. Standard Conditions of Approval Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way. 2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. 5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 6. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 7. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #197, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 10 It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days priorto breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387- 6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicants authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. E. Conclusions of Law The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACRD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Reconsideration Guidelines 11 SHAY JOHN W 84814130175 N F N ~ ~ ~ ~ J r j LL w AGNEW LONNIE D LL ~ W gg GLENN ROBERT F z ~do ~~~gyyy n p v R4B14130025 R4B14130100 a o ^1 p oe ^ ~ ~ '~ rc z KACHI A ESTATE Q m O 3z 3 ~ s11s91za70o R1 STATES INVESTI 51130121170 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 LO K 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 20 21 E. CECINA ST. LO K 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 O 10 9 8 7 ' LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ¢ E W W o °o m is r 3 ~ z a :MS CATMERIN E 51130110100 19 LOT' K 5 4 3 RICHARDSON CHARLF~ ~ I 51120336481 UODELL RUSSELL V' 51129223500 HOWARD SUSAN A 51129223590 TUSCANY DEVLOPMENT OVC. 57130141930 m S7130741850 (TUSCANY LAKES SUBDMSION N III 51129233810 3 6 5 4 3 3 9 7 J 1p E. PIENZA ST. ui 11 1 1 1 15 2 2 3 i 37 u 3 13 ¢ 36 13 4 4 14 O 3 Y 12 5 ~ 5 16 J 11 6 6 ~ 1 0 7 N 7 18 g gL C g5 vi 8 BLOCK 3 E. ITALY ST. 9 1 10 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 11 ' B O K6 12 1 17 13 12 11 10 9 8 13 14 15 16 E. SIENA ST: 15 16 17 18 19 ZEST TINA FAMILY 300 0 300 600 900 I BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. PROPOSED TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION ~~~~~ BRIGGS pp~'~~A~ ~~ muTr MF` 1 is nF eFrT7nN zn 'r AN., R.lE., B.M., VICINITY MAP (2081 ~4-9700 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD DESIGN DRAFT SCALE DATE DWG. NO. BOISE, IDAHO 83705 ImH 1"= 300' O4/10/09 30305 4 SHEET 1 OF 1 130306.APR 4~ ~~ numnw hIs GRANGE ~ mQ mwona wl l______ 1 . . ~ ~ . ______I ~a ~ s' I i Af11S I: _~, . L_I ~ ~y 1 I ~ _ ~ >® ~ % I i' ~, I ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~5~~ ! ~ 9~ ~ ~ ':~ BC~a~ °~s es ~~ aa ~ f ~~ g~gpipeie { 6DM ~~ ~~ it ~~~a~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~•"~ ~ ~ 1 1 II1,1 1 F I ~ 1 1 11 }( 1 I I N 1 I~ I I j' ITT ~ 1 1 1 ~1~7 1 1 1 I ~~~t~e~r~(F€~ ~FI~ 2 ~ F .r F PRELIMINARY PLAT r GROVE _ __ 11 11 11 ,111 ~ ~i 0• 11 91mf n~ 11 11 11 / 11 11, nu0wG1 ..~ 'fir ~F~ I~~t s~~g,~e~ ~ ~} @~ a ~•~3P~~~a~•s~y~ ~~Q ~~ ~ 4 oay~ r :~ ~ iwll® ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~- 1 1--^ 1-, :_~ 1 '--~ 1 '~ oul: .,, _ ._ Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties. a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by all Commissioners present. If a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a certain time. b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next scheduled regular Commission meeting. c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error of fact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the meeting. d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it occupied the momeht before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to ACHD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at which the matter is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides. e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action, interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable. If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover administrative costs, as established by the Commission. Request for Reconsideration 12