Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVineyards Subdivision VAR HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS - A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer CITY OF MERIDIAN MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste Water supt. Planner 8 Zoning Administrator KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 885-0433 • FAX (208) 887813 Chairman ~ Planning & Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-221 I GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: January 10. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/27/94 HEARING DATE: 1/17/95 REQUEST: Variance request BY: REB Irrevocable Trust LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Lots 3, 4. and 5 of Block 1 in Vineyards Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER _ CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: r~>~r~ri~>.ED 94 CITY OF MERIDIAN ~j ~ VARIANCE- APPLICATION (RE: Meridian Zoning Ordinance) ~~ ~ o rr~2~ v ~o ~ ~/~c T/u s ~- ~~ y67_1Oo a ~ ~ ~ II NAMF,: n~ ~(.~~~ ~ ~~~JN Phone: ~'a/~~~3 ' ~'~l%~ (Owner or holder of valid opti+~n) ~, p, ~~x 316 y ADDRESS: !r/9~c ra ~ ~ ~o ~.?6 GENERAL LOCATION:~1 PL2u L~Ne LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY; ~ ~ // n N/e/1 ~" PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OF VALID OPTION: A copy of your property deed or option agreement must he attached. PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION: ~ "/U VICINITY SKETCH: A vicinity map and/or site plan at a scale approved by the City showing property lines, streeLS existing and proposed zoning and such other items as the City may require. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS: A list of all property owners and addresses within, contiguous to, directly across the street from, and within a 300' radius of the parcel(s) proposed for a variance must be attached. (This information is available from the County Assessor.) D~E'SCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VA/RIA ~D ~ /i~iJz ~.O v.L ~D ~'1M~ ~1 a SIGNATURE ~~- ~ :~-='~ - _ - - CITY COUNCIL RECORDS Date Received C~ Council H g Date ~' Received by NOU 15 25 FR CITY OF MERIDIAN ~8 887 4813~1~1(,288139 P.02i03 ~. APPLICATION AND STANDARDS FOR VARIANCES A variance from the terms of this Ordinance shall not be granted try the Conncrl unless and until a written application for a variance is submitted to the Administrator and the Couacrl. Provide a written narrative containing, where applicable, the following outlined in/f^ormation: 1. Address of subject property. -~ e~Q~ ~ Y-r~sf g,E ~ yeetvac,46/e 2. Name, address and phone number of applicant. bU . R ° l3 ~~,~'o w.J X36.53 ,~~ ~ k ~~ P o Rox X61; N~/a~~, 3. Name, address and phone number of owners of subject properly "~ ~~_ ~ o00 °~~ - b~3-~ J y~ 4. Proof of ownership or valid option on the property or a contact interest therein with consent of the titled owner. S t c /4l~ir-~l ~d Dud ~ 5. Legal description of subject property. ~ OR NoK ~~ v~ ~~ 5 Akdr 6. Present use of subject property. 1/A-` A N f O G ~~"~'' rhtKUa l i 7. What is intended to be done on or with the property. - N ~ 9 kPd o~ ~~ ~ u s "v`~t s 8. The district that pertains to the subject property. ~;.1 e~ ~,~.,v G -.{~ 9. Vicinity map at a scale approved by the Council showing property Lnesj esp. ~g Sheets' proposed district and such other items as may be reglrired. ,See ~ f 10. Schematic building plans which indicate typical elevation and floor play of any proposed constntction_ A10 ~" ~~ p 1, ~ a 6/e 11. A list of the mailing.addresses of all property owners (from authentic tax records of Ada County) within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the lead being considered and a listing of the mailing addresses of~ all Property owners wrthm the area of the land being considered. ~'GC A-f~14c~~ 12. Characteristics of subjextproperty which prevent compce with the requirements of this e -II n ~ / - vd .cam Gcsc a a OrdmaaCC. lO' SipG 1GT'JN-G~' ~r~tSYx~o l 3. Minimum requirements o~this Ordinance: that need to be reduced to Permit proposed use. ,~I~M,Nafe ,u trcrow %' Se><---6~ok 14. Difficulty or hardship which would result if requirements of this Ordinance were applied to subject property. ,C, n~/ ~f- + yr~ ~ dusia<ss a acQ cn~a~ '~ ~ l ~ f~/-e /Voncf-Gc- So~~-~i cQa°rdG-ways 15. Unusual or peculiar circumsrtances wWch tndreate that regulations of this Ordinance ~' ,..~ w tCC /a should not be strictly complied with. o,uc p,« c p~ O ~ ro~~K ~ ~ 6~ ~.~vl ioQ~~ ~s paw p,ec e/ 11v f '~~~2~ to the land, 16. Statement that special conditions and circumstances exist which are peen structure or buildings involved which are not applicable to older lands, structures or buildings in the same district. ~ l~.~a~ ads ~~eKj~ ~ C aM ~ a/cG /~~ ~vo~tr~~'ia.S~ Sa>L-6~~!{ ~esu(t~ i~v u/~s><~ Ja ~~oPcK d ~~ ...., ~ _ SI~At f)VC I~C)tt KIstY)RI)!NG LtA'CA .' CORRECTION WARRANTY DEED (CORPORATE FORM) P-134257 JB/HH __ : MAX A, BO]~SIGER, INC . , AN IDAHO COl'.PORATIUN , a cttrpnral inn urganiiec! and exivtin~ under the laws ol'Ihu State of Idaho, with il.~ principal ul'licc al 2447 S. Vista Avenue Boise ol'County of Ada . Srttc nl'ltlahn, grantor. hcrchy C'(~NVT?Yti qtr (:.RANTS and WARRAN'C'S'I'O RE8 IRREVOCABLE TRUST of P.O. Box 464, Namps, ID 83653 TN>a DOLLARS ANA 01'IIER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIbERATION lhc. Rtlto~r~n~; d~sculx.d lract(ti) of land in Ada ~,.. _ .. THE i~AST 62.18 FEET OIr LOT 3 IN BLOCK 1 OF THE CORNER AT V ALONG THF. SOUTH LINE, ACCORDING TO TH>: PLAT THFRFUF, FILED A'1' PAGES 5876 ANb 5877, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. This Corraction Deed being recorded to correct t:he legal desc:riptinn on that certain Warranty Deed dated November 7, 1994 and recorded Nov©mbar 9, 1994 ae Instrument No. 94099b30, Ada County, Idaho. Lueatictn of ;,hove described property . _. _._. House Nu. ~;rantac(.) fitr the cunt of ern .l .nPZ ~. __ _ .... _....... _Cttunty. St~lc of Idaho: INL'YARDS, AS MFASUI2ED ~ ~ IN BOOK 60 OF PLATS The iifli~~i~rc whu ~i~*n this deed hercehy certify taut this: decd and the trun:acr rcprencntcd heroby arc auth~n'iic~ unilat ;, resalutian adopted by me heard etf directors ol'thc: grnntor .u ., lawful mec~tin~; belt! ;utd utlcttdcd by a yuuruu,. In wi,ness wh~rcnf, the grantor hay cau~cd its corporate name and xcal In h~: hereunto aflixcd by itx duly authorized otliccrr this 28th clay ttf November , A.p. !'1 94 MAX ~-,.,_. BUESIG)~R. TNC. _ ,~, _ _ • (CpRP(.)RATIs NAMR) RY• -• •• •- .. -. ~...._ .._ ._ kIC.HARll BOESIGFR, VICE- pRFSII)HN'!' Agchl: SFCRL 1'AItY STA'TF OU IDAHO , C'c-unty ol'_.. _ .~da _ .... ss. Qn t.ltis . ~ th _ , _ day of November . ,_ ._ ._, in the y~:tr of 1994 _ ,_, hel'itrC etc JEANPII?TTlr P4, GRJ:F'FIN BOESIGEIt ~~~ _ _ .. . ..~ ._..-._.._ .. .s-nntaryl~uhlic, pr,aun;tlly uppcttrtaT'- RICHARD __. ....- _ -..... ._ _ ._.. -.' - - - - . known ot• idettlified to cnc tU 6c the __ VICb: 1'RESIDElt'T ___ ,_ _ __.~ ...._, nt the. corporation that CXPCLifCd [hC InStrUnlCn[ pl' the ~1Cfti0n wha exec tlcll Ih InSh'UIUt:ltl all lx:half N' S:Iltl rn nmginn. and ttcknnwlctl~t.d to me that tiuch corportttictn executed the same. Notary Public:. , . _ ~ Ro+:idinF c,l: ~ BOISE. ID , , _„ ,.,__ „_ My CortultissiyG Expircx: 1 / I8 /9h_,___, _ , .w .__ . ~4257JB/HH ~._ .~_. ._._.._.......___ ._ _ ...~ _ ~ v. srnt:~()vt: roc )re RI'.Cf>ROIN('i t)A'1'A coRRECTION WARRANTY DEED (CORPORATE FORM) MAX A. 130ESIGER, YNC. , AN IDAHO CORPORATION , a ct-rpurariim or4anicui and existing under the lawn; of the State (tl' Idaho, wish its principal ol'licc ar 2447 S. Viska Aventte, Boise itl' C'uunry ul' Ada , Sale of Idaho, ~;rutt(tr, hereby CONVEYS or CItAN'1'5 and WARRANTS T4 W. ROY Y3RUWN, A MARRIED AN BLS HIS SOLE AND SEPERATF. 'I'ROYERTY ANU RtL'IiARD A. BROWN, A MARRIF.A MAN AS HIS SOLE AND SEPERATE PROP1:kTY ~;rantr.cts) ~f P.O. Box 464, Nampa, IA 83G53 tar the: suttt of TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONS~InF.RATIUN the ibllowirtg dcscrilx:d fraca(s) oi' land in Ada I)O1.LARS, c.~tttnty, Sttttc -~!• ldahc-: LOTS 3, 4 AND 5 IN BLOCK 1 O.F THE CARTIFR AT VINX:YAFtlls, ACGOI21)fNC To THE PLAT THl?1ZE,or•, Ft'LED IN BOOK 60 OF PLATS AT PAGES 5876 AND 5877, R}';CURDS OF ADA COUNTY, T.nAliO. EXCEPT THE EAST 62.18 FEET OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK 1 AS MF.ASIl1tLD ALnNC rxr~: snt,tTH LING. 'I'h•!~s Correction Deed being recorded to cor>:ect the leg,~l description uu Lhat certr~tn 'Warranty Dead dated November 7, 1994 and recorded November A, 1994 as Instrument No. 94099631 records of Ada County, Idaho Loco-tion ai':tbovC described property House No. ~trcct 'I'ltc oi'Pcers whc> si~,n this deed hc:n:hy certify thsn tr-is dc~c•d and the tr:-ntifcr r'eprescnk~c! h~n~by are aut}tc~rii.~d under a rcu-lut ion adopted by the hoard of directors of the grantor at a lawl'cd nu:cling, held and ;,tle,xlcc! !>y a qunrum. In witncsti whereof, the crrcntoi lriv cautiuti i,s cc}t~.wrttc m1ntC and sNal UI bC tlCrcunlu affixed by its duty autbonxcci c~l'fic~rs this 28th day of November , A.1?. lcl 94 MAX A. !it)~;S1Gl;'K, iNC. (COR1'~)RA'1'!s NAh•9E) RrCI3ARD BO1rSIGER, VICE- PREStUI:N'I' Attest' _...___..: ......_ SECIZL'TAItY STATF f.)t~ .. IDAHO , t-ounty ul' _ Ada __ ,, _,•.___: _, ss. known ar idcntifieci t(t me to lsc thu _ . VICE PRESIDENT _ i, of the corpt,rarinn shat t:xecuted the instrum4nt or the person -whc- c~xc~c~t cd ackrtc>wiedgccl to me that such curpctrFttion cxecuteci the .amc+. Nntary f'uhlic., Ra~icring nl My Cnmmissic. pc:rvanully arp~:-rcd,~_ RxCHARD A. BOESIGI~R On thi-; ._..._.._.. 28th ,day of Noyembet: , in the ye::,r of _.._149.4__. , .. , _ , itel'ctrc mr JEANN1rTTE M. GRtFFI~I , a notary public, ins,rumcnl utt txatal!' u!' said c•nrp{tr:Uiuu, and BASE: T'n _._.../. ~ ~rZnu~~,r~-wrr„~-r~nri ,+nr ~mr gnu ,m y r}mr~ Lm/~nrnr w-invr mrtw.~ln,~ 1~LiWl )'!6[]dit..171IL.i7liL 371J[~=' ._~.'~u.r +wi l•••• •~'auu.~au~~ 11!I ~. _.. 1 t ~ ,' . ~~ ~~ ~ ~~: ' ~y• ~~ ~ ' ~ ,~ I ~.I 1 i ~I ll~d ~3] ~ 71 ~ ~~ :-~1 A~ O~ r 7. 1 y 1 ` ~~~ .~. - r pO ~: ~ ~. _ ~~..._ - J ~ ~~; ~ K.Ax-..~ _. ~ , O r~ a ~ x ~ ~~ _..,~i • ~..~ r.~~ '~ PLAT OF THE CORNER AT VINEYARDS A SUBDIVISION IN THE NE 1/4 ~ 7FiE NE 1/4, SECTION 1+ T.3N., R.iW.. B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY. IDAXO ' ilea 50 23 O SD +00 1S0 SCAIE .IN fEET UNPLATTEO fWNO S/6' REBAR 4 ~~as o~F eE~~c) 2 I + ~I~NE CHERRY LANE ~~ `~~ N 33' 4r W IB96.Si' _ ~_ ~\ ~ _ a +1 +z N. g Y VVF-- M Z 's 7 soo ~~09 • E 231.23 ~ ~ ~ J ~~ -- ~~ $ 69' 4r E 2}0.16 ~• ~ ..~ ~ ii ~t p01 ~ T ~ X99.1] I 8 ~ 8 I t MA~~~ 'f"1 a ,q ~ 2 I ZpSla S!-af+ 8. S + 3 1 i 3 i A I "gy a ~ pp A I e~oac , i ~ ~ N ~ . ~-~ y h, ~ __ ~ 91T/ATE ~ 91gR7i-CfRE$5 AIA U1t1TY •pIDDINp U)T] 1 711A11 ] - I ... ' ___-JIe• A0~0 II ~_ s ~_ 11A ~_ ~_ ~~zza ~ Ilze9 _~ • nor .9.9 +i n o•c.w uNPUTTED fa ~sx"Qa.~~] ~ ~~ I i. A9 Iw ~~ ~r s.p1.I•~ ~x ~v ~v~l*a~ •a~„w1~ pwll•~ 19IXr r ._. , I~ p N I~ N ~~ 9 InRial Poht. S•t AlYminum Cap an Y :~- Fenno Bron Cap • S•t S/6•x 30• Rtlar nIN Reatie Cm • S•t 1/2•x 2~' R9oor •Nh PIC9Uc Cq . ~ ~ Bauneery I.YI• Ea•rn•nt 661• NORTH GATE SUBDIVISION 2r E 0036' J3' W ~6~ . LL •~ y°+~pyit • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk W S CITY OF MERIDIAN MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE eer P.E. City Eng GARY D. SM TH WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. t w s 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES ater . up JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste Planner a Zoning Administrator KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-0433 • FAX (208) 887813 Chairman -Planning & Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-221 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: January 10, 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/27/94 HEARING DATE: 1/17/95 REQUEST: Variance request BY: REB Irrevocable Trust LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Lots 3, 4. and 5 of Block 1 in Vineyards Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, PIZ CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C _BOB CORRIE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: 13 • VARIANCE- APPLICATION • (RE: Meridian Zoning Ordinance) t`~ E~ ~ o K~ ~~o~ ~/t.. Taus f ~~ yd~-zoo a NAME: ~n~ LGe~~ ~ Q~uJ~ Phone: ~~/~ ~)3 ' 1.~J!~ (Owner or holder of valid opti+~n) ~~ 4 ~ ~O~ 3~ `~ ADDRESS: ~~ ra ~ ~ ~iO ~~G,s~ GENERAL LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: ~ ~R `~ --_ _ _ '~~ AI2 Z( ~4 ~ g ~J ~S .C 2 a/ i4-fi~~~~~ - - _ F OF OWNERSHIP OF VALID OPTION: A copy of your property deed or option agreement must be attached. PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION: ~ "/tI VICINITY SKCTCH: A vicinity map and/or site plan at a scale approved by the City showing property lines, streets existing and proposed coning and such other items as the City may require. SURROUNDING PROPERTY O~iTNERS: A list of alt properly owners and addresses within, contiguous to, directly across the street from, and within a 300' radius of the parcel(s) proposed for a variance must be attached. (This information is available from the County Assessor.) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE: '1/~-1~~ i4nlG~G ~/D y+-, /.~ I~ I 1 t~~ SIGNATURE CITY COUNCIL RECORDS Date Received Received by. (~ Council He ' 'g Date . ~ ./ ~~ „ UNPLATTED N 00' 38' 33' E 258.00 -~" z43.o`0 -- JY' I ~.._ ~ w I w I~ a !I ~' S N 00' 3i' ~' E 243.00 ~~ ~9 O O ~~ m4 ~2~ A ~$~ y, ~ m 8 Co I ~ ~ ,I I ~I 2~ (an' - I ~ ~~ '~- / I ~ ~ L ~~ ~0y I+ W Z (~ u ~ N 2dJ. ZII '~ I _ f-' I O~ ~, ~. ~ I o ~ f u ~~ (r,~~ Q O O N ~ ~ N~~I ~ W ~ `Z 1 ~~~ ~$ S I ;~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ i ~ 0~• ~• u• ~~.. v N 3; ~ . ~~'---. .._...._. .. ~-- - .__ ..._ ._. ~ ~ -- ... . _. i c z • I, ~ ~y, . ~ r Ip p ~ ~, ~a ~ I ~ ::.I~ I O I N 00' 36' ' E 233.00 I ~ f~l I 39' I "\ 3. ~G I r.N h , . I ~~ ~ r u I II I ~ ___ ~ ``..~ ~ ~ r .. w ~t~~i - ~' N m y a o 0 u ~ O o ~ Z ~ ~w~ ~ ~ ~ ?Z ~ ~ ~ .. '°a . ~. k g~ m D ~ ~ ~ t0 ~ ~ -I N ~° ~ ~ y O '7i 'v ~ m o C m ~"'~ A o ~ g V' ~ TT ~~ Vl - - 2~ 1 _ ~~aZ04 00' 36' 33" W 193.15 ~ ~ 8 _ N. UNDER ROAD _ ~ N S 00' 3B' 33" W 2648.84 ... I ,~ N (0 Z W~ O ' v_- D I z~ ~ ,~ ! • "' - •r ~ _ , • ~•„ •,• - SI'At:l? PVC I~C)K Klit't)KI)INCi UA'rA coRR>~cTIO1J WARRANTY DEED (CORPORATE FORM) IrIA)C A, BOBSIGER, INC . , AN YDAHO COT.PORATIUN , a rnrpnnu inn organised and cxi~ting under the laws of thu State of ]daho, with itx principal nl'licc al 2447 S. Vista Avenue Boise of County oY Ada . Rlatc nl' Idaho, I;r:uttor. hcrchy C:(7NV1?YS,:r GRANTS and WARRAN't'S'!'C) R>~8 IRREVOCABLE TRUST of P.O, )3ox 46~-, Namps, ID 83653 (;rantec(s) fur lh~ au» of TN)a AOLLATtS ANA 01'IIER GOOp AND VADUABY.E CONS IllERATION not .t .,art s. Chc I'c lv~ri.n1:; diwsc;i~itx~d trac.t(ti) of land to Ada _.... ..... _. _._.... Ct u y .,tc c ,Iho. THE BAST 62.18 FEET OYr DOT 3 IN BLOCK Z OF THE COIZNER AT VINEYARDS, A4 NF.ASUI2~D ALONG TH>~ SOUTH LINE, ACCORAING TO THE PLAT THRRI30F, I~IDEA IN BOQK 60 OF PLATS ,r A'1' PAGES 5876 AND 5877, 1ZECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. ~_~..~ ~~...,~._..,.,.._,....._......_.......w...,....._W~.~.~._...... ,..,.,....4......~. _-.._..__.,~ ._.,. __ _ This Correction Deed being recorded to Correct the legal desc:r.ip>rion on that certain Warranty Deed dated November 7, 1994 sn~1 recorded November 9, 1994 ao Inot>:ument No. 94099b30, Ada County, Idaho, L.orttic.,n of above dcscttibu! property House Nu. Thy nftic~i~rc wha ~i~m thic deed hereby certify tt,at this: died and tltie truunlcr rca+rcrcntcd hen:by arc authuriccd uuila, ;, resalutinn adopted by the hnarct c~Pdireetors ol'thc grantor at ti lawful mec~ling held and aUcrul4d by a yuurwu. In witness whert;nf, [he grantor hav caused its corporals name and sctl In he ht~reunto al'lixcd by ils duty authctrirc:d ofliccrs ibis 28th day of November , A.p. 1') 94 MAC ~,,.•,.•BUE3IG1•rR. TN'C. „_ ~• _ (CpRPURATL' NAME) kIC.HARll BO>aSIGFR, VICE- pRRSII)L~N"I' ALletil: SFCRC:'1'Al2Y STA'1'F t7U IDAHO ,County ol'_.. _ .Ad~_. _.__ _. . ss. (an this -__„_,. 2 th _- .___ day of November. - . , . _, in the yettr of 1994 _ , _, hsli,rc ntc JBAIVNh~TIr Pi. G&1F'FIN .._ _ _ ... ._.. _._.._ .;t notary public, • _ .. - • •• pcr~cnrilly appunrt:d-_--- RICHARD ~oESIGER ` kni,wn oc idehlifiul to me t<~ hs the _~ VICb: 1'RESID)~)\'T _ _ _ at the corlwratioh that executed the intitrumem br the person who exec 11CtI Ih in,trwttuu u,t txhutf al's„i,l ~•n mm~i,+n. and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. . Notc,ry Public:., .. .) Rariditt$:,1: 30ISE. ID .,M,.,.___. .._ My Co,tUttirs~(, Expires: 1 / 18 /96_,_„_, _ . .~_ ,M_ • ~4257JB/Hx SPACE ~li IT)K Kl?C(>R(aIN('i t)A'I'A coRRECT~aN WARRANTY DEED (CORPORATE FOriM) MAX A. BUESIGER, INC, , AN IDAHO CORPORATION , a corpur-tion org:tnizui and existing ttndcr the tawr; of the State ttl' Idaho, with ils principal of'fi4c :tt 2447 S . Vista Avenue, Boise (,I' C'ounfy of AdS , :itutc of Id.tho, grutt(tr, hereby CONVTrYS or G[tAN'1'S and WAt2RANTS TQ W. ROY BROWN, A MARRIED AN A.S HIS SOLE AND SEPERATF. PROPERTY ANU RtCiiARD A. k3ROWN, A Mt1RRIF.D MAN AS HIS SOLE AND SEP1jRATE PROP1:1tTY ~;r:utta4(s) of f?. 0. Box 464, Nampz~, IA 83GS3 for Ihu suet uE' TEN DOLLARS AND OT~iER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONS~I DF.TtATTUN the tbtlowi(t!; described tract(s) of land in Ada ()(~1.1.AK5, C:nunty, 5ixtc oE'ldahct: LOTS 3, 4 AND 5 IN BLOCK 1 U~' THE CQRNF;R AT VIN~.YAFt:17S, ACGORUINC To THE PLAT THP.,1t1;Ur , FILED IN BOOK 60 OF PLATS AT PAGBS 5876 AND 5877, R~.CUItDS OF ADA COUNTY, tAAIiO. EXCEPT THE EAST (52,18 FRET OF T.U~ 3 IN BLOCK 1 AS MlEAS1tR1~ ALONG ~rt~ifr,: snr,rTH L1NE. 'T'h•t~s Correction Dead being recorded to carx•ect the legz(1 descripCic~n u~t Ltt.at ~ertr~tn 'Warranty Deed dated November 7, 1994 and recc,zded November 8, 1994 as In4trument No. 94U94631 records of Ada County, Idaho Location oCahove described property __ .__ ..._.. .. _._. ~ __... ___ _~ Heusi. No. Stroel •I'Ete cti7icen who si~,n this deed hen:hy certify thin this dc<<i and thr tr:tnxt'w• rtiprc~entrsd h~:ruby are :cuthorii~d under a resnlution adopted by the hoard of dircetnts of the grank~r at a EawfuE nu~cling held antl attendee! E,y a quortun. In witno„ whereof, the Frantar Eta., rau+ud i-:: cctrpc,r,,tc: nante and sc;d Ut bC. ltereuotu al'('ixcd by its duly aulttonicd nl'ficers this 28th day of November , A.1?. 1'1 94 MAX A. ]iUJJ51U1:;K, INC. (CORPURAT1r NAME) RICHARD BOESIGER, VINE- .PRES1DCiN'I' AtU:st: STATE C.)t~ .. IDAHO , t:ounty of Ada .._ ... ...._-_: _, ss, On tlti,t .._..._..... 28th • day of Novembez . JEANNI"WTT)a M. t3RtFFIN ~'~ pc;r~anully u~penrcd~_ RICI•iARD l~. BOE.",IGL'R ~_ -~..._..-- known or identified t(t me to be the _,_ VICE PRESIDENT _ _ of the enrpc,rution th:u executed the instrument or the person _ who rxc~c~t ed ac:knowlc(i~ed tc~ me tlt8t such utrprtrtttion executed the ,erne. Notary Puhlic.~ My Cmm~tisr;ic.~ , in the year of _...199.4_, , . , , , , Itelitr~ tttc --.~. ... _ _. .. . it Itptary pllE7iIL', instrument un tx;haJf' uJ'said rnrp{tralicut, ancE ~., ~ T) ...._ . . ...__i/18/9b ._.. , NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian,ldaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on January 17, 1995, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of REB Irrevocable Trust, for a Variance request for land located in Lots 3, 4 and 5 of Block 1 of Vineyards Subdivision, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located on the southwest corner of North Linder Road and W. Cheny Lane. The Application requests a Variance from ten foot interior set-back to allow zero lot line development. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, ~rtd is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 27th day of December, 1994. .~:1~~.---,~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., I CLERK 1!I 2~. _.., , b -% ! "'_ -~M..~ ~i y ~. ~ -- i - ~ - _L - ' _~ 1 ..-~ _,~ ~. ~'~ ~. x~ 0 ~ ~ 7. ~~ y A `~ j0 ~~~ .~ ~^--~~ r~~~ ~I~:~i'r..rr_ ~ ._. r -. ~ I ~ ....r ~ _' _ A ~ ~.~ O ~ ~i x __... r L d 35 ~O~`7 Cj -- .~ i Sc~ia ~' ~~sa ~~ '~'Yl.e~ 1 ~~/ ~3~Z ~0~~ - C ,A~l~ ~ ~'. /~e~c~ ~/.~~ /~- Si4-~.~u l~aSa l~l 1~e~. i ,., Odd ~ - ~0 6~~, r~D~erc~' /S ~d ~~ ~~ /~ ~~ <i O ! o O - S ~ ~~-as, ~ l ~~ ~N~eo ~s3a ~ , ~ , ~, ~~ ,. ~ 21 ~ - yCa~/~u.el~, ~ti~~~~s ~ ~~~ ,~y. S, ~- v~i~~/a F~1 u O 2 Zd ~ tt~A-- ss6,v ~ ,~, .~ iJ 1 ~8~ l r ! r ~/ ~ / d 2 ~~ - ~~'~~ ~,~,. ~s{PGA l ~~o t ~ •, i, (~ ! / ~l ! ~ L/ ~ X00 r ~u ie,eo, ~~ ~ ~S 1 Y ss' ~ l /~ ~• i l ~ 1 s 7D Z~ b I U~' s `~ ~c~c~A-w~- v-~ u~',t~ ~,r~e~~r cl~ 3 Bo ~l. Boa G~, Sup ~t ~G o fBOk ~ ~ awl, Zl~ 8~oi e y-'-~Crc~kA~, ~ J$36~Y 1 / / . ~ ~ S ~ 2 d Z. u ~ q ~ ~~ .. ~ ~-~, ~len~~ ~~O !~~ ~cy ~N, '1~+e,c. g36~i ~ t Zc5 2 y ~ q5 S Z_ ~A~e~~ Qrcl-~~r,~ 02 `-(~ ~q~~ p Z ~ ~l,~s`fLc r~~s X7'0 ~~Q~,~~~s~~~° ~cZ I ~~d~ w. ~~-ys s~ ~g~sc, ~~ S3~ov S ~ 201 ~ 3 ~ z S O- ~euy~,us, ~u ssc~~ ~ sag uJ . G~ ~G,c ~ ~ Zvi t~. , ~( ~~ss X. G~.v~O~,~, ~,,.crt- P36 yy ~36~1y ,. ~!` Meridian City Council February 7, 1995 Page 17 MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: Just for clarification then, we would like to funnel that through Gary. • Throu h Mr. Berg, the court tells me he is the recipi that nwhen I tried to take Kingsford. 9 hatic about , the minutes of the City of Meridian, they were very emp some over once. • FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF G S ACES ORIFIRST ITEM #5. REQUEST TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKI INTERSTATE BANK: Has the Council reviewed those findings? Is there a motion on the findings? Kingsford • Mr. Mayor, I would move that we hereby adopt the findings of fact and Morrow. conclusions of law. Tolsma: Second ord: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to approve the finlniterstate Bankdroll call vote. Kmgsf s aces for First of law on the variance request for parking p ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: Is there a motion on the decision? r. Ma or, based on the above findings of fact ands ons tasproved and'the Morrow: M Y decided the application for the variancelar~ 22 park ng spaces which will meet all the applicant shall construct and install and p requirements. Yerrington: Second • oved b Walt, second by Max to approve of the decision, all those in favor? Kingsford. M Y Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea • FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE ITEM #6. .~ ~. ~ ~ Meridian City Council February 7, 1995 Page 18 REQUEST FROM THE TEN FOOT INTERIOR SET BACK TO ALLOW ZERO LOT LINE DEVELOPMENT BY REB IRREVOCABLE TRUST: Kingsford: Have you reviewed those findings? Morrow. Mr. Mayor I move that we adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of law. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of the findings of fact and conclusions of law for the REB Irrevocable Trust variance on zero lot lines, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: Is there a motion on the decision? Morrow. Mr. Mayor the variance is denied or granted depending on the circumstances as set forth in the conclusion number 9 of the above conclusions of law and that the applicant shall record a document which document shows approval of the document by the City in which reflects the above decision this recording to inform all eventual owners of any of the three lots of this decision. That no building permit or permit shall be issued until plans for construction which show compliance with this decision have been approved by the City Building Director and the applicant has supplied to the City the required recorded document. Yerrington: Should that word director be changed to inspector? Kingsford: Well it says inspector on mine. Morrow: By golly it says inspector on mine too. Yerrington: I will second that motion. Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of the decision, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #7: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: FEBRUARY 7 1995 APPLICANT: REB IRREVOCABLE TRUST ITEM NUMBER; 6 REQUEST; VARIANCE FROM THE TEN FOQT INTERIOR SET-BACK TO ALLOW ZERO LOT LINE AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: COMMENTS FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OFLAW ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: ~ c~~ -~ ~~ , G~ F~BJe F d~~~3r~' pJ~ ~P~' OTHER: .. C~Op~ BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL APPLICATION OF R.E.B. IRREVOCABLE TRUST FOR A VARIANCE FROM TEN FOOT INTERIOR SET-BACK REQUIREMENT TO ALLOW ZERO LOT LINE DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The above entitled variance request having come on for hearing on January 17, 1995, at approximately 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, Roy Brown appearing on behalf of the Applicant, and the City Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony, the City Council of the City of Meridian makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of the public hearing on the variance was published for two consecutive weeks prior to the scheduled hearing for January 17, 1995, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the January 17, 1995, hearing; that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That the notice of public hearing is required to be sent to property owners within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the land being considered pursuant to 11-2-416 E., 11-2-419 D., and 11-9-612 B. l.b. of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that this requirement has been met. 3. That Roy Brown, appeared on behalf of the Applicant before the Council to explain the need for the variance; he stated FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 1 REB IRREVOCABLE TRUST - VARIANCE FROM 11-2-410, SET BACK ~ • • that he wants the City to grant the variance from the interior set- back requirement of ten (10) feet to allow a zero lot line development enabling him to develop lots 3, 4 and 5 as one parcel; that there would be a ten (10) foot set-back on the west side of lot 5; that there will never be access or easements from the back of this property to the residential property; he subsequently stated that Idaho Power Company has no power line easement across the property; that at least there is no easement recorded; that he understood that the Power Company has a right to access its power lines and that they have no problem with that. 4. That the ZONING SCHEDULE OF BULK AND COVERAGE CONTROLS in Section 11-2-410 A of the Zoning Ordinance, under the C-N requirements, it is stated that the interior side set-backs are ten (10) feet. 5. That the property is zoned C-N; that the Applicant is the owner of lots 3, 4 and 5 of the Corner at the Vineyards. 6. That the Central District Health Department, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, Meridian Fire Department & Police Department have submitted comments and they are incorporated herein; that the City Engineer, Ada County Highway District, and other governmental agencies may submit comments and they shall be incorporated herein if submitted. 7. That the Planning and Zoning Director, Shari Stiles, submitted her comments; she stated that the Applicant should maintain the ten (10) foot side yard setback on the east lot line FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 2 REB IRREVOCABLE TRUST - VARIANCE FROM 11-2-410, SET BACK • of Lot 3 and west lot line of Lot 5; that the variance be granted for the lot lines between Lots 4 and 5 and Lots 3 and 4 only. 8. There was testimony from the public, opposing the Application. 9. Gary Farnsworth, testified that he is the owner of the Mega Car Wash, which is on Lot 2 that abuts on the east side of the lots that Roy Brown and Company own; that his concerns lay with the traffic flow and safety; that if the set-back were to be reduced, the customers may start to use the bays as a means of getting through to the back to use the vacuums; that may propose a danger to children who at times stand next to the pillars as people are washing their cars; that as it is now, he has no future plans to expand; that he is hemmed in now, but is happy with what he has; that 20 foot farther west of the car wash is still Mr. Farnsworth's property; that Idaho Power's line runs within one (1) or two (2) feet of his property to the west; that there is an easement with Idaho Power; that there would be a problem in working on the power lines should a problem arise because the proposed variance would allow a development to be right up against another existing structure. 10. That John Wasson testified that he lives in the house directly behind lot 3; that his concerns range from traffic behind the proposed structure, the noise level, the possible trespassing and liability concerns; he already has people crossing his property illegally; that a fence is not a deterrent to trespass; that he FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 3 REB IRREVOCABLE TRUST - VARIANCE FROM 11-2-410, SET BACK • questions the type of project proposed and is opposed to allowing the variance until the Applicant states what kind of plan they have to build at the site. 11. That Hal DeGrange submitted testimony regarding his concerns with security and loitering; that he is opposed to this variance. 12. That there are, in fact, power line easements on lots 2 and 3, of Block 1, of The Corner at Vineyards; that the easement on Lot 3 is the easterly 7.5 feet of the lot and the easement on Lot 2 is the west 7.5 feet of the lot. 13. That Section 11-9-605 of the Subdivision and Development states in part as follows: "A MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS REQUIRED All plats submitted pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance, and all subdivisions, improvements and facilities done, constructed or made in accordance with said provisions shall comply with the minimum design standards set forth hereinafter in this Article; provided, however, that any higher standards adopted by any Highway District, State Highway Department or Health Agency shall prevail over those set forth herein. D EASEMENTS Unobstructed utility easements shall be provided along front lot lines, rear lot lines and side lot lines when deemed necessary; total easement width shall not be less than ten feet (10'). Unobstructed drainage way easements shall be provided as required by the Council. F LOTS Lots shall conform to the following: FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 4 REB IRREVOCABLE TRUST - VARIANCE FROM 11-2-410, SET BACK • • 4. Zero-Lot-Line Building Lots a. Yard Setbacks: In no case shall a zero lot line be allowed adjacent to a property line which is not part of the development application. A minimum distance of ten feet (10') shall be maintained between buildings or potential buildings on separate lots." 14. That no other comments regarding the variance were received. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City has authority to grant variances pursuant to Section 11-2-419 of the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to Section 11-9-612 of the Development Ordinances. 3. That the City Council has judged this application by the guidelines, standards, criteria, and policies contained in the Zoning Ordinance and upon the record submitted to it and the things upon which it may take judicial notice. 4. That the Council may take judicial notice of its own proceedings, those of the Commission, governmental statutes, ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and the State. 5. That the following provision of Section 11-2-419 A, of the Zoning Ordinance is noted which is pertinent to the FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 5 REB IRREVOCABLE TRUST - VARIANCE FROM 11-2-410, SET BACR Application: 11-2-419 A. "The Council may authorize in specific cases a variance from the terms of this Ordinance or from the Subdivision and Development Ordinances as will not be contrary to the public interest where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. No non-conforming use of neighboring lands, structures or buildings in the same district and no permitted or non-conforming use of lands, structures or buildings in other districts shall be considered grounds for issuance of a variance. Variances shall be granted only where strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. A variance application does not go to the Commission unless directed by the Council." 6. That the specific requirements regarding a variance that must be evidenced and found by the City Council are as follows: 11-2-419 C. FINDINGS A variance shall not be granted unless (as a result of a public hearing) the Council makes a statement of supportive reasons based directly on the evidence presented to it which supports conclusions that the mentioned standards and conditions of this Ordinance have been met by the applicant and unless all of the following exist: 1. That there are such special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would clearly be impracticable or unreasonable; 2. That strict compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance would result in extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because of unusual topography, other physical conditions or other conditions which are not self- inflicted, or that these conditions will result in inhibiting the achievements or the objectives of this Ordinance; 3. That the granting of the specified variance FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 6 REB IRREVOCABLE TRUST - VARIANCE FROM 11-2-410, SET BACK • will not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated; 4. That such variance will not have the effect of altering the interest and purpose of this Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 8. That regarding Section 11-2-419 C it is specifically concluded as follows: a. That there are no special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict application of the provisions of the applicable ordinances would clearly be unreasonable as far as the set back requirement on the east side of lot 3 and the west side of lot 5, since those lots are adjacent to the border property that is not owned by the Applicant and City Ordinances require that in no case shall a zero lot line be allowed adjacent to a property line which is not part of the development application. In regards to the variance of the set back requirements in relation to the lot lines between lots 3 and 4 and 4 and 5, if the Applicant constructs one building on all three lots, the set back is not required since the building would cover all of the property and there is no necessity for the set back. The City has granted such variances in the past. If there are individual buildings on the lots, the set back requirement would have to be met. b. That strict compliance with the set back requirement of ten feet would not result in extraordinary hardship to the Applicant as a result of factors not self-inflicted, since the ordinance requirements were in effect at the time the Applicant purchased the property and the Applicant could have learned of the requirement, if it did not know. However, in regard to the set back requirement between lots 3 and 4 and between lots 4 and 5, as stated above, there is no necessity for the requirement if one building will be constructed on all three lots. c. That the granting of the specified variance for the lot lines between lots 2 and 3 and the west lot line of lot 5, would be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 7 REB IRREVOCABLE TRUST - VARIANCE FROM 11-2-410, SET BACK • • d. That such variance would have the effect of altering the interests and purposes of the set back Ordinance or the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as pertains to the lot line between lots 2 and 3 and the lot line on the west side of lot 5. 9. That it is concluded that the Application for variance should be denied as pertains to the lot lines between lots 2 and three and the west lot line of lot 5; that the variance of the set back requirement as relates to the lot line between lots 3 and 4 and the lot line between lots 4 and 5, should be granted if one building is built which totally covers the lot lines between lots 3, 4 and 5; that the variance of the set back requirement should be granted if one building is built which covers the lot line between lots 3 and 4 and one building is built which covers the lot line between lots 4 and 5; that the variance should not be granted where there are individual buildings built on each of the three lots, lots 3, 4 and 5. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The City Council of the City of Meridian does hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL: COUNCILMAN MORROW COUNCILMAN YERRINGTON COUNCILMAN CORRIE COUNCILMAN TOLSMA MAYOR KINGSFORD (TIE BREAKER) VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED i%~ VOTED APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 8 REB IRREVOCABLE TRUST - VARIANCE FROM 11-2-410, SET BACK i ~ . .. DECISION The variance is denied or granted depending on the circumstances as set forth in Conclusion Number 9 of the above Conclusions of Law; that Applicant shall record a document, which document shows approval of the document by the City and which reflects the above decision; this recording to inform all eventual owners of any of the three lots of this decision; that no building permit, or permits, shall be issued until plans for construction which show compliance with this decision have been approved by the City Building Inspector and the Applicant has supplied to the City the required r corded document. APPROVED: DENIED: FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 9 REB IRREVOCABLE TRUST - VARIANCE FROM 11-2-410, SET BACK • • Meridian City Council January 17, 1995 Page 5 MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #15: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A GROUP DAY CARE BY LARRY STOKER: The applicant requested that the application be withdrawn. ITEM #16: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF ACRD RIGHT OF WAY BY RAMON YORGASON: The motion was made and seconded to approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea The motion was made and seconded to have the City Attorney prepare an annexation ordinance. MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #17: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FOR FIRST INTERSTATE BANK: Leonard Ruff, the architect for First Interstate Bank, testified before the Council that the landscaped easement reduces their space and they could only get 22 parking spaces; that this was a hardship on the Bank. No other testimony was taken. It was moved and seconded to have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law for the next meeting. MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #18: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE TEN FOOT INTERIOR SET-BACK TO ALLOW ZERO LOT LINE DEVELOPMENT BY REB IRREVOCABLE TRUST: Roy Brown testified before the Council and explained the need for the variance. Gary Farnsworth, 1991 Turnberry, was sworn by the City Attomey. Meridian City Council January 17, 1995 Page 6 Farnsworth: Good evening Mayor and Council members, as life long members of the City of Meridian we appreciate the way the City adheres to the codes and keeps the lots whether they be commercial or residential in some kind of uniform standard. I am as we were discussing earlier the owner of Mega Car Wash which is lot #2 that abuts on the west side of the lots that Brown and Company oven. If I understood what Mr. Brown said there is no easement on the east side of the lot between myself and the Maverick. When we built we adhered to the standards without asking for or getting any exceptions from the City and put in a landscape strip of 10 feet between us and the Maverick. A lot of my concerns on this would be the fact that a lot of it is traffic flow. Around the west side of the car wash there is 20 feet of my property up to the property line. And that is used quite regularly as flow from the front to the back and the back to the front of the car wash. Some people prefer to drive around the end of the build and use the vacuums first and then go in and wash their car. Or if the bays happen to be full of people, it just gives us the flow back there that vve really like. Another concern would be the safety of it, if we restrict that area over there and allow the cars where they can't drive that way they are going to start using the bays themselves to drive from the front to the back. A lot of people come in there and they have their children with them, they pull in and the kids get out and stand on the comers of the bays. I am just afraid sometime that somebody may go racing through one or 2 of those bays and one of those kids will just step out from behind a pillar just a couple three feet and we could have a very serious problem there. I have talked to Arden Davis who as you all know handles the commercial development for Idaho Power. He voiced some concerns on this too, the power which I supplied and financed to go into the lot for that whole development there runs right down that property line between lots 2 and lots 3. He has said that Idaho Power at a minimum likes 5 feet on either side of that power line. I think that some of the concerns that they had as far as not being able to come in and move the power or reroute the power past that. So I guess that, those are my biggest concerns on it and I would just like to see that we develop the commercial ground there adhering to the lines like everybody had and I think it would keep everything neat and uniform and the safety concerns should be eliminated. And in that light I would like to see the variance is denied. Kingsford: Any questions for Mr. Farnsworth? Corrie: Mr. Mayor, Gary let me make sure I understand what you said here now. From the comer of your west side of the car wash 20 foot is your property in, so the 20 foot further west is still on your property. Farnsworth: That is correct, approximately. Corrie: And then it starts No. 3. • • Meridian City Council January 17, 1995 Page 7 Farnsworth: That is correct. Kingsford: Then is that power supposedly right on that property line? Farnsworth: It is within a foot or 2 of it. They run it intentionally down the property line. The gentleman, it was Max Boesiger that had the property before that sold it to the Brown's, and he had to sign an easement with Idaho Power to allow them to come in and also for future use on the power line in case there is a problem with it. If you have, as Councilman Tolsma mentioned earlier, you get the buildings right up there if there is ever a problem with that power there is absolutely no way that Idaho Power can work on it, repair it, replace it or whatever is needed. That was Arden Davis's concerns with it too. Tolsma: If you were to add onto the west end of your, what (inaudible). Famsworth: That is something I am glad you brought up, I forgot to put it in my notes, on top of the concerns that I have already mentioned, it hems the property in an awful lot. Where the Brown's have 2 acres to deal with I am restricted to just what I have, the property that I do have down there. In answer specifically to your question, a bay is 17 feet from center to center which there would be time in the future that we might consider that. That is way down the line, I am pretty much landlocked as it is. The only reason I can see with moving everything clear over against my property line would just be to allow 10 feet more profit on the west side for REB Trust. Kingsford: Any other questions for Gary? Morrow: I think 1 would make a comment with respect to your testimony is a little inconsistent in terms of adding on because then certainly the Brown's are entitled to your people not driving on their 10 feet. They are held to the 10 feet and if you take another 10 feet of your property that leaves it 10 foot out a way for your cars to drive through. Farnsworth: We have, like I say, we don't have any intention. Councilman Tolsma's question was how much was the width of a bay. I would have like to have acquired more land there and expanded but the fact that we are hemmed in now we are happy with what we have. In the future we will move on and maybe or maybe not build one somewhere else. We have really enjoyed the car wash business it is myself and family that run it. My daughter Jennifer who is my number 1 car wash attendant. Kingsford: Any other questions for Gary? Anyone else from the public? John Wasson, 1486 North Silverado Place, was sworn by the City Attorney. Meridian City Council January 17, 1995 Page 8 Wasson: I live in the house that will be directly behind lot 3 I think. We are just off set by the car wash that the gentleman owns. My self and some of my neighbors are concerned with several questions as to what kind of industry or commercial business should actually be located at that site. We are concerned with the traffic behind the building, the noise level that it will cause, the type of building that will be constructed. Is it going to be for example a pizza place, a dentist office something like that, because that may have a great impact on trespass across our property which we are already having a problem and which has been voiced to the Chief of Police and the Police Department. But for that reason we request or I request that no decision be made on this variance until REB Irrevocable Trust comes forward and states what kind of plan that they are going to put forward to build at that site. Additionally, the building that they place in there may or may not have a impact on the property value of the homes directly behind that. So for that reason request to know what is going in there before a variance be changed. Kingsford: Any questions? Corrie: Mr. Wasson, you said your house was directly behind it, is there a fence between you and that? Wasson: Yes there is, it doesn't seem to stop anybody from the age of about 10 to 32. We are concerned, you know people crossing our lot illegally but I am not sure that absolves us of any liability should somebody in there trespassing. Kingsford: Any other questions of John? Anyone else? Brown: Let me visit first with Gary's comments. We were aware that the power line went under the ground, if you remember my original comments was that we are not suggesting that we build. right on that property line far that very purpose. The set back off the property line would determine that actual power line running through there. There is some question apparently at this point that it would have to be set back far enough that Idaho Power could get to the easement if necessary. But in respect to that Idaho Power has no easement across that property at least none is recorded on the deeds. Apparently it is an agreement that was made or understood that when they run that power line through there that they would have access to it. Which we agreed to there is not a concern with us with that. Then as far as driving around the property Gary's comment, 1 am sure that he would agree with this, he is not suggesting that he drive on our property he is suggesting that he drive on his own property. The property that he has there is adequate for driving around, if he should add another bay to his property than that would have to be addressed at that time either by him or by you gentlemen if he was asking for some kind of variance whatever the case may be. But as far as our part is concerned one of the concerns that we have is you can't drive effectively on 10 feet. So what you have done by putting those interior set Meridian City Council January 17, 1995 Page 9 • backs you have made 10 foot wheat patches or whatever down the sides of these buildings so there is noway, they can't be utilized, there is nothing that you can do with them other than you can't drive on them obviously, you can't park on them. So we feel it is a more satisfactory solution to be able to set those buildings over a little bit and utilize the property and still leave plenty of room for the easements that Gary was talking about. He made a comment relative to the fact that we bought 2 acres of ground and we have plenty to use and we are crowding Gary. That is certainly not true, that was never our intent we are simply trying to utilize the property as best we can. True we bought the 2 acres of ground and we paid a lot of money for 2 acres of ground if you will pardon me saying so. Let me comment on Mr. Wasson, I assume his name was Wasson. The property itself in total including the Maverick, including Gary's property, the property behind us has a wood fence completely across the back of it and up the west side to the road. The fence I assume is a 6 foot fence, at least it is a standard height fence. I cannot be penetrated by child or anyone else unless they drive through it or whatever the case may be. The property has a 39 foot easement across the back of all 5 of those lots including the Maverick and the lots that we acquired. There is an easement across there that can't be built on. The utilities are in that, the purpose of that easement is to allow ingress and egress for all of the property and the tenants to go out the back of the property onto Linder, they would be going west onto Linder Road. That is the only access that there would be some of the properties to Linder Road. That crosses the back of Gary's property and the back of Maverick's property as well as the back of our property. That is available to all persons for all 5 lots. So I don't think the concern that Mr. Wasson expressed 1 am not even sure what he was really talking about as far as people climbing or going back and forth because you can drive back and forth. First of all there is no room back there, it is just mud except for Gary and the Maverick. But needless to say there will never be access or easements from the back of this property to the residential property. It is blocked off, there is a church on one side of it and there is residential that backs the lots of 4 and 5. So hopefully that might help. Kingsford: Dealing with children I suggest that you watch your statement of saying it is not penetrable by children. That doesn't happen. Anyone else from the public? Wasson: I would just like to respond to one of those comments that the gentleman made. The type of industry or building that is placed there makes a great deal of difference as to trespass. Children are not going to jump normally a fence to go to the doctor's office, children are going to jump a fence to go to a pizza but or a video arcade or whatever. Additionally, t am not sure if anyone is familiar with the fence construction but you can easily put a foot through that fence and walk through it, that is nothing that kids don't do hundreds of times a day across the nation. But a 6 foot fence with lower and upper backing is not difficult to climb by anybody. Thank you. • Meridian City Council January 17, 1995 Page 10 Kingsford: Anyone else? Hal DeGrange, 1450 North Silverado Place, was sworn by the City Attorney. DeGrange: In regards to being a resident just south of Lot 3 I believe, kind of southwest of the car wash. Our concerns as a resident are very serious in regards to security, my neighbor to the north of me, Mr. Joe Carlton has already had an intruder, juvenile, that had been scared from his home not too long ago. Unfortunately he was away from his home, we have had problems in the past with people juveniles jumping the fence, jumping 2 fences to get to the Maverick store. In regards to John Wasson's question as to regards of what type of facility is being erected here. We are concerned with something that is pleasing to the environment to the neighborhood is 3 smaller professional buildings with the necessary landscaping between these 10 foot easement versus some larger Burger King or something along these lines. I think John's question was very viable, myself and the residents are certainly opposed. I speak for myself and my wife, we are opposed to this variance. We feel that a large building actually allows larger shadows for the individuals who we find that loiter during high school lunch hours behind the church, the parking lots are used for people joining up for lunches and sometimes a little drag race, cookie spinning in the parking lots this kind of nature where 3 smaller buildings definitely sheds more light to the travel ways by local authorities to find anybody lurking in the shadows. And to Mr. Brown's comment, yes we do have a security problem in that corner section of the neighborhood and that is a very viable concerns of the residents. Thank you. Kingsford: Thank you, anyone else from the public? Farnsworth: Mayor and Councilmen, the one point that Mr. Brown made, I just couldn't help saying something. As far as a 10 foot wheat patch there if anybody has been out to Mega Car Wash, and I hope you all have, the set back that I had on the east side of the building of 10 foot is not a 10 foot wheat patch, it has extruded curbing, it is landscaped, it is watered, it is grassy it is nice, it is a beautiful thing to look at in the summertime and even this time of the year. So we are not just dealing with just a 10 foot strip of weeds down through there. As far as the access there on the other side I do have the 20 feet there which is asphalted and there is room there for a car to go back and forth through there, even if there was a building right up against on the property line. Although I think there was a building on the property line there some of the visibility would be impaired driving through that you really have narrowed the access through there and the visibility again for the safety reasons I mentioned. If you had that other 10 feet you will do what I did with it and landscape it, you have more visibility and it is going to look really nice. Thank you again. Kingsford: Last call, I will close the public hearing, Council members. ~. w j • • Meridian City Council January 17, 1995 Page 11 Morrow: I would move that we instruct the City Attorney to prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law on the request for variance from the 10 foot interior set back by REB Irrevocable Trust, all those in Favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #19: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW RESIDENT MANAGER HOUSING UNIT BY AVEST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: Kingsford: At this time I will open that public hearing and invite the owner or their designee to speak first: Billy Ray Strite, 1087 River Street, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Strite: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, Billy Ray Strite here along with Avest in support of this application. We are in receipt here of the staff comments and appreciate the support there as well. We have an unusual circumstance here in our beliefs where we have an accessory to a principle permitted use which is not allowed by out right use. The unit is an (inaudible) part of this permitted use. We believe as an industry standard it is certainly to the benefit of the surrounding neighborhood in terms of security. I think from that standpoint the variance is certainly a necessity. The variance was predicated upon the original conditional use which under the development agreement as I understand it and Council could probably comment, this became a variance to the use as opposed to part of the original conditional use. With that if you have any questions I would be more than happy to answer them. I think it is a pretty straight forward approach and certainly would attempt to answer any questions you may have. Kingsford: Any questions of Mr. Strite? Crookston: I just have one, what kind of living structure would this person have? Strite: Mr. Mayor, Counselor, we are proposing a 1200 square foot unit that has 2 bedrooms, a small office area which is the support unit for the mini-storage giving visibility to and from as well as security to and from the units them selves. If I could and certainly to make this public record if you would like, if you notice the large parcel there in the back this is certainly a small parcel, this being created for the resident manager and his staff • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: JANUARY 17.1995 APPLICANT: REB IRREVOCABLE TRUST ITEM NUMBER; 18 REQUEST;~QUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE TEN FOOT INTERIOR SET-BACK TO ALLOW LOT LINE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: COMMENTS FORTHCOMING CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: "REVIEWED" CITY FIRE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENT8 CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: F~~ „~ ~~w s C~~ ~ ~klk~ ~~ P Y • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS OFFICIALS A GOOCI Place t0 L1V2 RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk ERIDIA MAk YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer CITY OF M WALT W. MORROW GARY 0. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer SHARI STILES BRUCE D. STUART, water works supt. SHAWCROFT, Wasie Water Supt. JOHN T 33 EAST IDAHO Planner & Zoning Administrator . KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 JIM JOHNSON W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 88711813 Chairman ~ Planning & Zoning WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: January 10 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1 /27194 _ HEARING DATE: 1/17/95 REQUEST: Vari nce re ues BY: RE evo bl T st LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Lots 3 4 and 5 of Block 1 in 'ne ards bdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P2 -CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z -TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C -BOB CORRIE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C -WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT -BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY -CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RE TION(PRE 8t FINA T) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMA S: f1Cr ~ Q ~nn~. _ .... . ERIDIAN • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk W S I CITY OF MERIDIA eer P.E. City Eng Y D SM TH GAR BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO JOHN T. sHAwcROFT, waste water supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner & Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman • Planning 8 Zoning TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: Januar~l 10 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/27/94 HEARING DATE: 1!17/95 REQUEST: Variance request BY: REB Irrevocable Trust LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Lots 3 4 and 5 of Block 1 in Vinekards Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C -BOB CORRIE, C/C ,-WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT -BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT] U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES j ^~ , 1 ~ ` ~ y OTHER: d o~ YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: c6[ £y.-y, ~... 55 CENTRAL •• DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Rezone # REVIEW SHEET Environmental Health Division . ~ ;~.:.. .~ ~~ ra ~ 5 " . ,r Conditional Use # Preliminary /Final /Short Plat Return to: ^ Boise ^ Eagle ^ Garden city ~eridian ^ Kuna ^ Acz Sy~i~dis i aJ ^ I. We have Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type-of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet ^ 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage ^ central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ^ 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ^ central water ^ 9. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ 10. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ I I. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store 13. !^/E ff~'~/C Iy0 Ol~IG-Gr-7o)J,s~ ~ Date: ~/ ~~ Reviewed By: 1/=i'77~f'~?~ ~Fc~ STo~i G~sfs~~2 ~l~t~/A~rl~/T /2'GotiJrJE~D ,yt'7o~/ CDHD 10/91 rcb, rev. I Il93 jll CacNTRAL • • ~~~ ~ DISTRfCT ~• •~ ~; ~ G 1~~~~~ ~~._ DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE • 707 N. ARMStRCNG ?l. • 801Si:.1p. 83104 • 1208) 315.5211 • FAX: 321a.~ To prereru and that disease and disability; io promote healthy lifestyles: and to protect and promote the health and quality of our encirorunenG STORMWATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that the first one half inch of stormwater be pretreated through a grassy Swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a star~nwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: 1) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND, State of Washington Department of Ecology, February 1992 2) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER AND SITE DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT 3) CALIFORNIA BEST MANAGr'U~NT PRACTI~ HANDBOOK ' Prepared by Camp Dresser and McBee, Larry Walker Assoc., Uribe and Assoc., Resources Planning Assoc., for the Stormwater Quality Task Force 4) URBAN STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL Volume 3, Best Management Practices Stormwater Quality Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, Colorado 9atiey, EtmcrG Boise, and Ada Counties Aaareoe.cou~ratea xncsoe.- en,«.ca.+nasa ea~ar.co~s903c~ vd.rca..+rom~. ~e.a~a teoa~ra smEam~cK a~+•m-+ P sos..a..91JOt Boee ~ MannmRanu.~. 1905e~5heerE frmaHemtt37-7ao9 . . a7705Rt33d3~a e3bu~587•un7 Mo~ncsst~an+..i0. a+.au-ns~ ~•r~+n.~m7~o lzauei~a~.D. eaauati~~ r~srn.~ma~ms~ae~ asaxi~,.eee~s t~taelia~7.addd0 WIC::27-;.t~ ~ i HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live WILLIAMG.BERG,JR.,CityClerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer RONALD R. TOLSMA OBERT D!CORRIE CITY OF MERIDIAN GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Planner 8 Zoning Administrator W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Chairman • Planning d Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 ~ 1~ ~ L~ O ~ V V GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor 3 0 D ~ C 1894 NAMPA TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON D~~~~~~~tOJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the IlOleridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: January 10. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/27/94 HEARING DATE: 1/17/95 REQUEST: Variance request BY: REB Irrevocable Trust LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Lots 3. 4. and 5 of Block 1 in Vineyards Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z -CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z -TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C _606 CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C _MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 81 FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 81 FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT} CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS~ampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the variance request by REB Irrevocable Trust. -CITY PLANNER ~,,~/ ~.~,~ -. ' Bill Henson, Assistant Water Superintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District '~ ~.' Imo" ~. ~'F.. i' ir" f `,• _ _ 1 A !1 ~ fl •5!t ryr JK1ti 1 U i~.lJ 1. i !! '~1'q i~i><:t,l)J'l/-i t • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney MEMORANDUM A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning & Zoning TO: Mayor and Council ~-- {;~~ S FROM: L. tiles, Plamm~~ & Zonis Administrator DATE: January 13, 1995 ~T:T ~~~~ ~~ CITY t~F ~l~~iDlAl~ SUBJECT: Request for Variance to Sideyard Setback Requirements by REB Irrevocable Trust Applicant has requested variance to allow zero-lot-line development on contiguous parcels under one ownership. I recommend that the variance be granted for the lot lines between Lots 4 and 5 and Lots 3 and 4 only. Applicant should maintain 10' sideyard setback on the east lot line of Lot 3 and west lot line of Lot 5. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG. JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS. City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS. Fire Chie( W.L. "BtIL" GORDON. Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. Attorney A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888.4433 • FAX (208) 887813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-221 I GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALO R. TOLSMA MAk YERRINGTON ROBERT 0. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner b Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman • Planning 8 2on~nG TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: January/ 10 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/27!94 HEARING DATE: 1/17/95 REQUEST: Variance re uest BY: REB Irrevocable Trust LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Lots 3 4 and 5 of Block 1 in Vineyards Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) JIM SHEARER, P2 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P2 CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION .DISTRICT BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) WALT MORROW, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) C/C MAX YERRINGTON INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) , WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM Et FINAL PLAT) SEWER DEPARTMENT CITY FILES BUILDING DEPARTMENT OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: POLICE DEPARTMENT _ CITY ATTORNEY _. CITY ENGINEER - U S WEST REQUEST A 10' EASII~Irr AIANG FRONT CITY PLANNER - AND REAR p~p~~y T •TNF'S . AND A 5' E;ASEI~NT ALONG ALL SIDE L(7T LINES THANK YOU ~ ~: ~ ~'~ ~~ A.J. CARISON JAPE 2 ~ 195