Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSandpiper Restaurants CUPWILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICF_ L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI S. STILES, P & Z Adm. PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney * couNaL MEluler=Rs HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA CITY OF MERIDIAN MAX YERRINGTON WALT W. MORROW 33 EAST IDAHO P & Z COMMISSION MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 MOE AUDJANI Public WorksBuilding Departrnent (208) 887-2211 JIM SHEARER Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 CHARLIE ROUNTREE TIM HEPPER GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Ha11, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: September 5, 1995 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 8/21/95 HEARING DATE: 9/12/95 REQUEST: Conditional Use for full service restaurant lounge and micro-brewery BY:Bandpiaer Restaurants Inc. LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: NE corner of Central Valley Drive and Progress Ave ~ JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P2 CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C -MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT -POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) CITY FlLES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~E~ AUG 2 1 1995 CITY OF 11~FRIDIA~V The ~.~ 1 e July 19, 1995 RESTAURANTS, INC. City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Attn:. Shan Stiles, Planning & Zoning Administrator Re: Conditional Use Permit -Owyhee Cattle Company Dear Shari; Per your request, and to comply with the city outline for a C. ~.P., we provide the following: 1. Applicant: Sandpiper Restaurants, Inc. 1100 West Jefferson, Boise, ID 83701 208-342-7701 2. Owner: R.T. Nahas Co. of Idaho 102 S. 17th Street, Boise, ID 83702 208-336-6661 3. Legal: A portion of Lot 1, Block 6, Central Valley Corporate Pazk 4. Consent: Copy of notarized consent of owner attached. ~/'~I .~' i L ~'~ 5. Existing Use: Vacant 6. Proposed Use: Full service restaurant and lounge. 7. Present Zoning; CG 8, Vicinity Map: 30 copies (attached) 9. Adjacent Owners: Mailing list attached. 10. Fee: Check attached 11. Site Plan: 35 copies attached We agree to pay any additional sewer, water or trash fees or charges, if any, associated with the use. CORPORATE OFFICE • IIOO WEST JEFFERSON • P.O. BOX 1579 • BOISE, IDAHO 83701 • (208) 342-7701 • FAX (208) 342-7703 • We agree to post the property one week before the hearing. We have read the contents of the application and certify that the information contained herein is true and correct. ~, i ~~, `7 Sandpiper Restaurants, Inc. E. James Parkinson Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me this ~ 9 ~ day of , 194. G Notary Public My commission Expires on 7 • ~ 3 • Z 00 ~ • • CENTRAL VALLEY ~ CORPORATE PARK July 18, 1995 City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 To Whom It May Concern: ~~~~~ J U l 1 9 1995 Cx`C'Y 0~ MERIDIAN We the undersigned, as owners of the property in question, hereby consent to Sandpiper Restaurants, Inc. filing our application for a Conditional Use Permit with the City of Meridian. R.T. Nahas ~o.-of-~ ___ ~ ,_ ---- %~ - --~ -- - -- ~~ .. ~ _: ~_ _ __ - W. Nahas STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) On this I9 ~ day of July, 1995, before me a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT W. NAHAS, known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing, and acknowledged to me that, they executed the same. WITNESS MY SEAL. ,~. ~~~•ANN~STF~9 ~Q,~ ~ ~'•~~` otary Public for Idaho OTAR *r N ~ Y ; Residing at ~BL1C * Commission Expires :, ,: s+~••......•••' p 82(~ 1D uite 300 Boise, Idaho 83702 (208) 336-6661 • 7 I ~ ~~ I ~ ~ Q i r .~ ~ * ~ ~ . - -• -• -- ' ~ 1 (V ~ * ~~ ' ~ i N ,,,,,,..a 1 I Q ~ I . ~ a } _ ~ Q i °I ~ ; ~• ,, + ~ I ~ i ~ ~` ~ ~~ ~ ' `M 1 ' • ' w ~ ! • ti ~ i ~ . ~ M ~ 6AJ ~ ......... .............. , N ~ .~ ~ ' r ~ s J- .- ; . , '~ ~ _ ~ ; ,•~ .... ~~ ~ ~ " ! ;a C'3 :: a U ~ ~ ; W ; ; ~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ .. ' R S `t v ~~~ ~ . a~ w , O' V : i° x a ;: cn 1 V ~ '-~. n '~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ R l ~~~. a-'•tii~~s•t u.•u+••••t~.a-tAZ. ~IVt1Y~~. + ..w ~ .MY ~~ ~ _.J"e't _ i `VI ~ +,~ it ~ \ ~1 I I 1 ~~. • E a r- M 1 «- O 0 0 ,..; i !I r / f W V I W W W I a MAR 20 '95 1000 FR CITY OF MERIDIAN Est-It" Fax Nate 7671 ,Date 31~~ L:,°me~ ,:7 ~ ~•~t one a t 1-~ 208 887 4813 TO 342??03 • -F MERIDIAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT P.01~07 NAME: Sandpiper Restaurants, Inc. PHONE: 208-342-7701 ADDRESS: 1100 W Jefferson Roi fi w+„, r~~ho 8~7n 1 GENERAL LOCATION: Central Valley Corporate Park DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE: Fu 11 Service Restaurant and Lounge ~ ~~ B ~ ZONING CLASSIFICATION: CG PLAN: A plan of the proposed site for the conditional use showing the location of all buildings, Parking and loading areas, ~~ffic access and traffic circulation, open spaces, landscaping, refuse and service areas, utilities, signs and yards (submit 35 copies). c Signs a of Applicant Sandpiper Restaurants, Inc. O S LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING E. James Parkinson, Pres. Pursuant to established procedure, NOTICE IS HEREBX GIVEN that the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a Public Hearing in the Meridian City Hall on at _.rn. The purpose of the Hearing is to consider a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT submitted by for the property generally described as located at SUBDIVISION, BLOCK ,LOT ._ TO The , ~ a~ 1 e~ RESTAURANTS, INC. PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF PROPERTY Computrol Inc. 499 East Corporate Drive Meridian, ID 83642 2. R.T. Nahas Co. of Idaho 102 South 17th Street Boise, ID 83702 3. Rocky Mountain Pizza. Huts 604 North Philippi Boise, ID 83705 4. Eddy - Warilla Inc. 2581 South Broadway Boise, ID 83706 5. Principal Mutual Life Insurance c% McDonald Corporation P.O. Box 66207 AMF O'Hare Chicago, IL 60666 CORPORATE OFFICE • 1100 WEST JEFFERSON • P.O. BOX 1579 • BOISE, IDAHO 83701 • (208) 342.-7701 • FAX (208) 342.-7703 ~ The . ~ ~.~ 1 e~ July 19, 1995 RESTAURANTS, INC. City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Attn: Shari Stiles, Planning & Zoning Administrator Re: Conditional Use Permit -Owyhee Cattle Company Dear Shari; Per your request, and to comply with the city outline for a C.U.P., we provide the following: 1. Applicant: Sandpiper Restaurants, Inc. 1100 West Jefferson, Boise, ID 83701 208-342-7701 2. Owner: R.T. Nahas Co. of Idaho 102 S. 17th Street, Boise, ID 83702 208-336-6661 3. Legal: A portion of Lot 1, Block 6, Central Valley Corporate Park 4. Consent: Copy of notarized consent of owner attached. ~/ba 6i' ~ L ~`~ 5, Existing Use: Vacant 6. Proposed Use: Full service restaurant and lounge. 7. Present Zoning: CG 8. Vicinity Map: 30 copies (attached) 9, Adjacent Owners: Mailing list attached. 10. Fee: Check attached 11. Site Plan: 35 copies attached We agree to pay any additional sewer, water or trash fees or charges, if any, associated with the use. CORPORATE OFFICE • 1100 WEST JEFFERSON • P.O. BOX 1579 • BOISE, IDAHO 83701 • (z,o8) 34Z-7701 • FAX (208) 342-7703 • • We agree to post the property one week before the hearing. We have read the contents of the application and certify that the information contained herein is true and correct. l~ Sandpiper Restaurants, Inc. E. James Parkinson Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me this / 9 ~ day of , 199. --9s~~~ ~ Notary Public My commission Expires on 7 ~ l 3 ~ Z o0 ~ CENTRAL VALLEY CORPORATE PARK • ~t~C~:IVED ,! U L 1 9 1995 C~'rY +OI: MERIDIAN July 18, 1995 City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 To Whom It May Concern: We the undersigned, as owners of the property in question, hereby consent to Sandpiper Restaurants, Inc. filing our application for a Conditional Use Permit with the City of Meridian. R . T . Nahas Co .-- .= __r -~ -- ~ f_,. _.__ t. $o~"rt W. Nahas STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) On this /~9 - day of July, 1995, before me a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT W. NAHAS, known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. WITNESS MY SEAL. ,,, •.•q~ ~~~'•pNN~sTF~ VQ~ ~.-~ otary Public for Idaho OTARy ' N...~. Residing at * ~ : ~ Commission Expires pIJBLIC • l ••..... s '' •' ~(~ 10 uite 300 Boise, Idaho 83702 (208) 336-6661 NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on September 12, 1995, for the purpose of reviewing and t~nsidering the Application of Sandpiper Restaurants, Inc., for a Conditional Use Permit for land located in a portion of Lot 1, Block 6 of Central Valley Corporate Park, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located on the NE comer of Central Valley Drive and Progress Ave. The Application requests a Conditional Use Permit for a full service restaurant and lounge and mirco-brewery. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East fdaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shat! be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 24th day of August, 1995. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., C C ERK ' ~ t ~ REcEwED 1996 _ _ FEB20 SHERRY R. HUBER, President CITY OF INERIDIAN SUSAN S. EASTLAKE, Vice President JAMES E. BRUCE, Secretary February 16, 1996 TO: Sandpipper Restaurants, Inc. 1100 W Jefferson St P.O. Box 1579 Boise, ID 83701 FROM: Karen Gallagher, Coordinato Development Services Divisi SUBJECT: MCU-15-95 Progress Ave and 1st St Your application for the above referenced project was acted on by the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District on February 14, 1996. The attached staff report lists conditions of approval and street improvements which are required. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 345-7680. KG cc: Development Services Chron John Edney Chuck Rinaldi City of Meridian Roylance and Assoc ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714-6499 • Phone (208) 345-7680 AD~OUNTY HIGHWAY Dl"S-. TRICT Development Services Division Development Application Report MCU-15-95 -Progress n/o Central Valley, City of Meridian Restaurant, lounge &micro-brewery The applicant is requesting conditional use approval for a full service restaurant, lounge and micro-brewery. The site is located on the east side of Progress Avenue just north of Central Drive. This development is estimated to generate 1,540 additional vehicle trips per day. Roads impacted by this development: Progress Avenue -Local street with no pathway designation - No traffic count available ACHD Commission Date -February 14, 1996 - 7:00 p.m. iIhl~._LIll.1'K.Jlz1 ~'Lll1t'L.1J LiIL_~I ~1i5il~i I , I f ~ l LL11llJ Cl1ll~ ~:_W_1 y~ ~ • r `.^ ... _~ UNIOn --t I/IC P•ILAO~C ~ yN P~SVIG MtL .PO ------ __ -__ -~-~ cI L ; E~~ !L 1~~ .~. ~ C-G .,~\ ! 1~~'• nom Anw ~n~ ~ r .. Y ~V/~ ~~r t \~ - p~oJE~~~., -___. a ~ ;; I~ _~~„~ii /'+~A PLANNING A ~N. SEP 1 4 1~~~~ C--G -~I_-#_ I. -_-~ ~ I { • _ - -- _ '~ - __. , / v Y ~ -~ _ - - _ - _ _ - ~ - __ ___ ~ ~, r ti _ E: CC -.%'---- - - - - -- --- ~~'r . 7-_ , ,. _ ~ ~ ~ - _ ~ _ ~ n _ _ ~p i ~- _: t = ~ i `~_ /•` \ • / r r/ . ~y _ 171.64' I `, L i ! F~ /~,, A ~ ~ i \ ~ _ ~~`~~ ` _ . ~ ~~ ~h40' ACCESS AND ,~~ ~ ~ ~ o! a- I I Q~ `- / - ~ ~,~ „d ~. ~ . _ QO ~ (~! r UTILITY EASEMENT y i _ - - *~ i ~ VACAnON OF HEADWAY ~ ~ ~~, r ~ ~ 1_ ~ / ~ ~i - COURT (PUBLIC STREET) ?= ^ ~~ a ~~S c ,~ i ~ ~' ,~v - ~h/ 219.45' ~~; ~~~ ~' r C. ~~~ ,~ ry s. + \ ~. ~ ,.~ •; .. BLOCK 2 s ~ \ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ,, H~p 200.00' 178.52' ' ~ N \ - r1 4 ~. S,. ,,. - . '~ -~ , , N 9000 00' w \ °4::;: ------- ~ 620.75' ~ ~ ~- ~~ - + ,~ LOCK 2 ~ \~ ~ ~ ijaD ~ ~'' _ _ A ~. ,F :: ,rt - , ~_~ u,. - ~,~- „~ao ~ ~~; C.ENTi~L Y~11.1.EY t~R~eR~kTE pi~R tt K ~. ~ ~. NOTES 1 BUILDING SETBACKS IN THIS SUBaVISION SHALL CONFORM TO 1HE APPUCABIE ZONING REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF MERIaAN, AND THE 'AMENDED DECUJtAnON OF COVENANTS, CONanONS, AND RESTRICnONS FOR CENTRAL VALLEY CORPORATE PARK', (FILED AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 8934034, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTRY, IDAHO), AND THOSE 'CENTRAL VALLEY CORPORATE PARK DESIGN STANDARDS AS REFERRED TO IN SaD AMENDED DECLARATION. 2 ALL DRIVEWAY LOCAnONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY aSTRICT. 3 ALL LOT ONES COMMON TO A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY HAVE A TEN (10) FOOT WIDE PERMANENT PUBLIC UT1UnE5, DRAINAGE, IRRIGAnON AND LANDSCAPE EASEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 4 DEVELOPER SHALL COMPLY WITH IDAHO CODE SECnON 31-3805 RELATING TO IRRIGAnON RIGHTS, TRANSFER, AND DISCLOSURE. 5 ANY RESUBDIVISION OF THIS PLAT SHALL COMPLY 1MTH THE APPLICABLE 20NING REGULATONS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF THE RESUBDIVISION, OR AS ALLOWED. j BY CONanONAL USE PERMIT. k~ • • ~~ ~~ ~" rn _~ :O .~ CENTRAL ~~~_ ~~~vE R W 7 ul OC O- 4 Y 0 _ N E~~wa~ V/-crtTioK -hP ~~~p PoR -- - ~~ I 0 --- ~~• ~. Qy~ .__ .HEvV -~PcsE~. 1~o~cwAY -~~------ ~S. u - ~~- a ~~ H~~ .~ '~~~r ti ~~~€a g s~~~ ~~ Facts and Findings. A. General Information CG -Zoning 1.06 -Acres 7, 800 -Square feet of proposed building 281 -Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada -Impact Fee Benefit Zone Western Cities -Impact Fee Assessment District Progress Avenue Local commercial street with no pathway designation No traffic count available 275-feet of frontage 60-feet existing right-of--way (30-feet from centerline) No additional right-of--way required Progress Avenue is improved with a 41-foot street section with curb, gutter and no sidewalk. Headway Cour Local commercial street with no pathway designation 170-feet of frontage 60-feet existing right-of--way (30-feet from centerline) Headway Court has not been improved. The District is in process of reviewing an application to vacate the right-of--way for Headway Court. If the vacation is approved, there will be no requirements for street improvements. If the vacation is not approved, this site's frontage on Headway Court will be required to be improved to the standard required in the District's report for the preliminary plat of Central Valley Corporate Park. B. The project is proposed to be developed on a portion of Lot 1, Block 6, Central Valley Corporate Park No.2 (proposed Lot 17, Central Valley Corporate Park No.6), abutting Progress Avenue. C. No direct lot access is proposed from Progress Avenue. The site plan proposes two driveways on Headway Court and 9 parking stalls with direct perpendicular access to Headway Court. If Headway Court is not vacated, the parking stalls would need to be eliminated and the driveways would need meet the District's offset requirement of 50- feet and driveway width requirements. D. Additional access is proposed on the south side of the parcel. As part of a larger development proposal to be reviewed in the future, a private road or driveway is proposed along the site's south boundary to create a 4-legged intersection with Progress MCU1595. WPD Page 2 Avenue and Cent~Drive. The private road would prov~access to the subject site and a major wholesale grocery store to be located southeast of this site. The proposed grocery store has not yet been reviewed by the District. Changes in the design of the Progress/Central intersection are required to modify the existing 3-legged intersection into a 4-legged intersection. These changes are discussed below. E. The original master plan for the Central Valley Corporate Park included a mix of commercial, office, and light industrial land uses. A master plan traffic study was conducted and the roadway system was designed to meet the anticipated traffic needs. Under the original land use plan the Central Valley Corporate Park was estimated to generate approximately 16,000 daily vehicle trips. F. The revised land use plan for the project includes the same land uses of commercial, office, and light industrial; however, the commercial component for the revised plan is much larger than anticipated in the original plan. A master plan traffic study was conducted and the roadway system was designed to meet the anticipated traffic needs. A pathway system was developed with a paved pathway or sidewalk on one side of the streets. A revised land use plan for Central Valley Corporate Park has been submitted and estimates approximately 19,700 daily vehicle trips to be generated. Because of the increase in the amount of commercial development, the District has been requiring the construction of sidewalk on new development in Central Valley Corporate Park. When the District originally approved Central Valley Corporate Park Subdivision, it was intended to have a higher mix of light industrial uses. Sidewalks were not required on the streets because of the industrial uses. Because the subdivision is actually developing with commercial, retail, and food service businesses, staff recommends that sidewalk be required on the street(s) abutting this site. G. The original subdivision was planned with a "T" type intersection for the Central Drive/Progress Avenue location with a stop sign on the two Progress Avenue approaches. The intersection has been constructed as "T" type intersection and operates without any traffic control. The current traffic volumes do not justify the installation of stop signs. H. Staff required an updated traffic study to identify the impacts of the proposed changes in land use and to justify the revised roadway network. The key findings of the revised traffic study include: i. The revised traffic volumes show approximately 13,000 eastbound daily vehicle trips at the proposed 4-legged Central Drive/Progress Avenue intersection, most of them related to the proposed major grocery store. ii. Because of the heavy east-west traffic flow, Traffic Services has determined that the Central Drive/Progress Avenue intersection will require stop signs at the Progress Avenue approaches. iii. The intersection of Central Drive/Progress Avenue will require a free eastbound right-turn lane to southbound Progress Avenue. A high volume of traffic (405 pm peak hour trips) is anticipated at build-out conditions for the eastbound MCU 1595. WPD Page 3 right-turn~e. This added turn lane is needed to ~imize delay for the higher volume movements and allow the intersection to operate at an acceptable level of service. Staff has determined that the added right-turn lane is an essential element of the intersection and that the new driveway approach (e.g. the fourth leg of the Central/Progress intersection) should not be permitted unless this added turn lane is developed. iv. Left turns should be prohibited on Central Drive for the existing driveways located less than 150-feet east of E. 1st Street. v. Central Drive should be widened to 6 traffic lanes. I. The added right-turn lane will require additional right-of--way from the restaurant property at the southwest corner of the Central/Progress intersection (McDonalds). The applicant has submitted a letter of intent from the restaurant owner that supports the sale of the needed right-of--way under specific conditions. Staff recommends that the right-of--way for the turn lane be required with this application at no cost to the District to ensure the ability to construct the right-turn lane in the future. The existing median on Central Drive should be extended to a point approximately 180-feet east of the East First Street stop bar. This median is needed to control left- turn movements at the two westerly driveways on Central Drive. This will prohibit left turns in/out of the McDonald's store at a driveway located less than 110-feet from East 1st Street. (The location does not meet current District standards). The median will need to be reduced in width to 4-feet. K. The application as proposed will create a 4-legged intersection at Progress Avenue and Central Drive; however, construction of the eastbound right-turn on Central Drive, extension of the median in Central Drive, and reconstruction of Central Drive to 6 traffic lanes will not be necessary until traffic volumes exceed 4,000 vehicle trips per day on Progress Avenue south of Central Drive or 2,000 vehicle trips per day on the new driveway on the east side of Progress Avenue (aligned with Central Drive). L. With the proposed revisions, the transportation system will be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposed development. M. This application was scheduled for a public hearing by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission on September 12, 1995. District staff has not brought the application forward to the Commission until the requested traffic study was received and the resulting findings and recommendations could be finalized. The following requirements are provided to the City of Meridian as conditions for approval: Site Specific Requirements: No direct lot access is proposed or approved from Progress Avenue. MCU1595. WPD Page 4 2. Receive approval the vacation of Headway Court from District. If the vacation of Headway Court is not approved, submit a revised site plan to Development Services to be reviewed and approved by the Commission. The site plan shall be revised to show the driveways on Headway Court in conformance with the District's offset requirements. 3. Utility street cuts in the new pavement on Progress Avenue will not be allowed unless approved by the District Commission. 4. Construct 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Progress Avenue abutting the site. 5. Construct a 41-foot curb return approach with 15-foot radii on Progress Avenue in alignment with Central Drive. This driveway shall be paved 40-feet wide and a minimum of 30-feet beyond the sidewalk on Progress Avenue. 6. Two stop signs should be installed at the applicant's expense on the two Progress Avenue approaches. 7. Dedicate by warranty deed up to a 65-foot x 65-foot right-of--way triangle (or appropriate curve) at the southwest corner of Progress Avenue and Central Drive to keep street improvements within the public right-of--way prior to District approval or issuance of any right-of--way work permits. The owner will ~ be compensated for this additional right-of--way. 8. Obtain a letter from the owner of McDonald's restaurant stating that they understand and agree that their northern driveway on Progress Avenue will be eliminated in the future. 9. Aright-of--way permit must be obtained from ACRD for any street or utility construction within the public right-of--way. Utility cuts should be combined where practical to limit pavement damage. Contact Construction Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file number) for details. Standard Requirements: 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the Development Services Supervisor. The request shall specifically identi each requirement ro be recon idered and include a written planation of why such a requirem „r would result in a ub tantial hard~ip or ~• Requests received prior to the date scheduled for Commission action shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. 2. A request for an appeal of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Development Services Supervisor within 15 calendar days of the action and shall MCU1595. WPD Page 5 include a minimu~ee of $110.00. The appeal will be sc~uled to b~ heard by the Commission within 20 calendar days after receipt. The request for appeal shall sp ' lcally identi each requirement to hP rPrnnc;riPrari a„ include a written ~?lanation of why such a reauirPmenr wnilld re~»lr in a c„heranti~~rdshin Or tneauity 3. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACHD prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits). The proposed drainage system shall retain all storm water on-site and shall conform to the requirements of Meridian. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of--way or in a common lot owned by an owners association set aside specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable amenities placed in said easement. Drainage lots and their use restrictions shall be noted on the plat (when applicable). 4. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. 5. Construct pedestrian ramps on the corner of all street intersection in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 40-1335. 6. Dedicate a 20' x 20' right-of--way triangle (or appropriate curve to keep street improvements within the public right-of--way) at all intersections abutting and/or within the development prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits). 7. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across parcel. 8. Provide written approval from the appropriate irrigation/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 9. If street improvements are proposed, locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drainage ditches and appurtenances, etc.) outside of the public right-of--way, as may be required by the District. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. 10. Locate proposed sign(s) out of the public right-of--way and out of the clear-vision sight- triangle of all street and driveway intersections. 11. The developer is required to install street name signs at the locations approved by the Ada County Highway District. Purchase street name signs, sign poles, and mounting hardware from ACHD's Traffic Operations Department or an approved outside supplier. The District will not manufacture street signs until a copy of the recorded plat showing the recording data has been provided to Development Services staff. MCU 1595. WPD Page 6 12. Provide a clear vision sight triangle at all street intersectio• Within this trian le no g obstruction higher than 36-inches above the top of pavement will be allowed, including landscaping, berms, fences, walls or shrubs. The triangle shall be defined by the long leg measured down the centerline of any collector 350-feet; and the short leg measured down the centerline from the collector street curb line 20-feet. Provide notes on the plat and street construction plans of these restrictions. 13. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 14. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACRD. 15. All public streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 16. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACHD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 17. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 18. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District .prior to District approval for occupancy. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. Submitted by: Date of Commission Approval• Developmen 4ervi~PC Staff MCU 1595. WPD Page 7 • Meridian City Council February 6, 1996 Page 15 • Sale: Mr. Mayor, anything is possible if you throw enough money into it. Initially as I said we don't plan to remove these improvements through here because (inaudible) except here. When we take this out we will have to come back down into here so that when we go to here to this point (inaudible). That is not something that we are eager to take on and all those homeowners (inaudible). Particularly here in this case where it just isn't needed yet. But yes it could be done. Corrie: Any further comment from Council? Sale: Mr. Mayor if you perceive any fault on our part I apologize for that. We proceeded in what we felt was the appropriate manner both from an engineering standpoint and from a cost effective standpoint. Corrie: Thank you Larry. ITEM #5: TABLED JANUARY 16, 1996: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT, LOUNGE AND MICRO-BREWERY BY SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS: Corrie: Is the representative from Sandpiper here tonight? Exley: Mr. Mayor and members of the City Council, my name is Landon Exley, I am a representative of Sandpiper Restaurants and a partner in this particular project. We are here tonight seeking your approval for our CUP for a full service restaurant, lounge and micro-brewery. The location of the project of the facility is in Central Valley Corporate Park, it is a portion of lot 1, block 6 in the C-G zone. The parcel consists of 1.06 acres or approximately 40,000 square feet. The square footage of the restaurant is approximately 7000 square feet. It will seat approximately 228 people. We have on site parking for 63 cars which is 163% of the required plus of our own (inaudible) we are going to build 40 additional spaces on the commercial parking lot across the drive way on the east side of the restaurant. In the Central Valley Corporate Park in this area they have a reciprocal parking agreement anyway. So they can park on ours and we can park on theirs. As part of our arrangement with Nahas we are going to improve 40 additional spaces. After considerable searching we decided to have the building designed by Mark LaRoche of Seattle, he is rather famous for a number of restaurants that he has designed and also he is very big in designing wineries in the Napa Valley. The architect of the project will be Stan Olson of Olson and Associates of Nampa. He will do the construction documents. The engineer is Roylance Engineering, the traffic engineer is Bell Walker. Mr. Jim Parkinson the owner of Sandpiper Restaurants is also here this evening if we need to prevail on him. A brief description of the restaurant so you know what we intend on doing, it is a semi rustic steak house operation with lots of volume inside and somewhat of an • • Meridian City Council February 6, 1996 Page 16 industrial interior so lots of the ducting will be shown, the grain delivery shoot that goes to the micro-brewery will be exposed and it will be lots of wood inside. All of the cooking will be over open displayed custom wood fire grill and rotisserie. This cooking area is out in the center of the restaurant and there is counter in front of it, it will be very exciting, an all wood fire. This will be the focal point of the restaurant.. The restaurant will also include a 15 barrel capacity micro-brewing facility which will produce a variety of hand crafted beers and root beer. Some of the production of this micro-brewery will go to the other Sandpiper Restaurants located in Idaho and the one in Oregon. The brew pub components will be highly visible from the entrance to the restaurant from the lounge area and some of the locations within the restaurant where people will be eating. An outdoor patio with full food service is also accessible through the brew pub. Needless to say we are very excited about this project, we have been somewhat delayed by a few minor workouts with ACRD on the intersection there of Progress and Central Drive. As of Friday we are satisfied that they are reasonably resolved and that we now with the time constraint of needing to do working drawings and get a building permit and try and make the building season we are here before you tonight. We also hope that this is maybe a start of a successful expansion of this concept throughout states in the west. Please understand as you look at these drawings and that drawing up there that these are the preliminary design drawings by Mark LaRoche and when I say approximately 7000 feet and approximately 228 when we get down to the working drawings that might change a little bet but this is very close. I do have other drawings if you wish to see them either a plot map or a floor plan and a couple of other elevations showing the volume inside. I would be happy to share those with you. We accept atl of the conditions as proposed by staff and we will abide by all of the city codes. We request and solicit your approval. We will answer any questions that you may have. Thank you Corrie: Thank you Mr. Exley, Council? Morrow: I have a question, are you going to serve barbecued beef ribs on the menu? (Inaudible) Exley: Lots of beef and chicken? Corrie: Any other questions from Council? Rountree: Do you feel you have final resolve with ACHD? Exley: Well Shari was at the meeting Friday and I wasn't, but I am satisfied that the sufficient steps have been taken to ensure that we have a direct shot from Center Drive into the commercial area of the Central Valley Corporate Park and that the mitigation • • Meridian City Council February 6, 1996 Page 17 measure that ACRD wanted for the right tum lane of the McDonalds has been satisfied and McDonalds has agreed to it. We are under a time constraint and we are willing to go forward based on the fact that they will resolve it and I think they will. McDonalds has agreed to it and they are the key. They just have to do the legal documentation. They have to create a second right hand tum lane and it involves a minor take of that corner. We are kind of between a rock and a hard place, we don't have a lot of choices. We wanted to come through and we wanted a straight shot and Nahas the developers of the park wanted to go through, they understand where. we are and we are here for the use permit and we will have to wrestle that as it presents itself. Corrie: Any further comments from Council? Staff? Smith: Mr. Mayor, reading the Highway District's draft report, I just had a question, one of the items they talked about was left turn should be prohibited on Central Valley between east first and progress avenue. I am wondering if that meant the left turn into the chevron and the Taco Time? Sale: Mr. Mayor, again for the record Larry Sale, Ada County Highway District. First of all I want to express our appreciation for the patience that this applicant has had or maybe their contained impatience, but they were the tip of the iceberg so to speak and we were also hearing from the developer of the overall property that there were going to be some major traffic generators coming into that intersection and they wanted to make a four way intersection out of it. I will try to make this long story short. The entire subdivision was originally approved according to a master plan and a traffic study reflecting that master plan which indicated that progress avenue and central drive should come to a t- intersection and it would serve the whole project nicely. The developer comes forth and makes a four legged intersection out of central and progress and these gentlemen are on the property next door they are requesting a vacation of an existing platted street right of way. We wanted to make sure we had all of our ducks in a row if we could and we requested another traffic study reflecting the revised master plan of the whole area. When reviewing that that indicates and I am going to give these numbers from memory, so if they tum out later to be a little incorrect please forgive me. That indicates to be 13,000 trips a day on central drive between East 1st and progress, 9,000 of those trips I think will go on east through this what is going to be a private driveway, extension of central. That is going to require several things at the point in time that the traffic through the intersection exceeds 4,000 trips a day, these are what we are going to require of Mr. Nahas the subdivision developer. There will be an additional, let me back up, what we are requiring right now of him is that he provide the right of way at the southwest corner of progress and central on the McDonalds that he provides sufficient right of way there now for a future right turn lane. If we don't' do it now we lose the handle on everyone. When the trips go through the intersection exceed 4,000 trips a day there wall be a requirement that the • Meridian City Council February 6, 1996 Page 18 developer construct a new right turn from Central south bound to progress. The. two progress legs will be stopped, with stop signs and central, the through traffic will extend east and west on central into this private driveway back to the major traffic generator. At some point in the future probably about that time the highway district will construct a median in central valley which will prohibit left turns both into the Chevron station and into that existing driveway into McDonald's which for all intensive purposes is a right in and right out now because it is so close to East 1st. Central will be widened a bit to allow enough room for additional left turns at progress. Based on last Wednesday's meeting or last Friday's meeting I am able to tell you that we think all of the questions have been resolved that application, Nahas' application goes before the Commission tomorrow. We will proceed with the vacation of Headway Court and it will be going ahead in due course. So, I think that I can substantiate the gentleman's statement that it took some time but I think we got the right answers and they all seem to be in a win win situation right now. Corrie: Thank you Mr. Sale. Gary Smith: Thank you Mr. Mayor, Mr. Sale your memory recount of figures is exceptional. Corrie: Any further comments from staff or Council? Hearing none I will entertain a motion. Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I would move that we adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of law as prepared for us by P & Z. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree that we accept the findings of fact and conclusions of law as adopted by the Planning and Zoning, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Bentley -Yea, Rountree -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Corrie: Now I need a motion to approve the conditional use permit. Is there a decision? Morrow. I vwuld move that the City Council approve the conditional use permit requested by the applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of taw. Rountree: Second Rountree: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree, all those in favor say • • Meridian City Council February 6, 1996 Page 19 aye? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Corrie: Yes sir Dolby: My name is Pat Dolby, I am here representing Fred Meyer, the last item on your agenda, very quickly. There were some comments that I wanted to make and also there were some questions that came up during the hearing that I would like to have addressed. I apologize for not speaking sooner and I would be happy to wait until the end of the meeting if you don't want to revisit the subject at this point in time. Corrie: Council what is your pleasure, do you want to address it now or at the end? Morrow. I guess from my perspective I would just as soon press on with the agenda and address it at the end. I think that the presentation by Mr. Sale was basically one of a fact finding for the Council based on Councilman Bentley's and my request that he present the district's position in terms of the transportation issues. We as a City need to make a decision on how it is we are going to address this particular issue and other issues with respect to other development agreements in the future. I don't know whether there is an appropriate forum here to discuss or whether it is a matter that ought to be discussed at our strategic planning sessions for example. I would throw that to my fellow Council members to see what their thoughts would be. Corrie: I understand (inaudible) anxious to have this settled. They are having an opening date set. I guess Mr. Bentley would you have any comment? Bentley: No Corrie: Mr. Rountree? Rountree: I agree with Walt on deferring hearing anything at this point until after. I wouldn't mind listening to what Pat has to say. Corrie: Mr. Tolsma you agree? Tolsma: I agree Corrie: Okay we will bring it up at the end of the meeting then Pat. ITEM #6: TABLED JANUARY 16, 1996: AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: FEBRUARY 6.1996 APPLICANT: SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS ITEM NUMBER; 5 REQUEST; CONDI110NAL USE PERMIT FOR A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT LOUNGE AND MICRO BREWERY AG NCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: P & Z MINUTES FOR 9-12-95 CITY ENGINEER: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OFLAW CITY POLICE DEPT: "REVIEWED" CITY FIRE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS II SEE ATTACHED COMMENT$ V ~j 1 0 ~~ ~ ~ U ,~ ~ ~ V // U" OTHER: AIR Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 12, 1995 Page 13 We operate in 14 states. Crookston: You operate in the US West states, the states they operate in Smith: Correct, and so we probably have a couple thousand of these sites currently operating throughout our markets. There are a number of jurisdictions that will and have required (inaudible) location. We will accomodate the other people. Johnson: Any other questions of Mr. Smith? Are you aware of any publications on this subject? Would you make sure that Mr. Crookston gets on that mailing list. You wanted to address the Commission or did you get your questions answered? Is there anyone else that would like to address the Commission. At this time I will close the public hearing. What would you like to do with the pole? Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I move that have findings of fact and conclusions of law prepared for the request for cellular communication facility. Hepper: Second Johnson: Moved and seconded that we have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law on the application from US West, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #14: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT, LOUNGE, AND MICRO-BREWERY BY SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS: , Johnson: At this time I will open the public hearing and ask that the representative for the Sandpiper Restaurants come before the Commission. Landon Exley, 1130 West Jefferson, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Exley: I am representing Sandpiper Restaurants here this evening and we are before you to seek your aprpoval of a full service, lounge and micro-brewery located in Central Valley Corporate Park on a portion of Lot 1, Block 6. The restaurant will be of a barn style architecture located on a pad consisting of 1.06 acres for 46, 300 square feet. The gross square footage of the restaurant is 6,924 square feet with a total seating capacity of 228. We 63 on site parking spaces at your ratios is 160% of required. We accept the conditions and the submittal of the agencies as passed onto us. I would be happy to answer any questions for you. We have Charlie Gongre of Roylance our engineer is here ~ • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 12, 1995 Page 14 and also Stan Olson of Olson and Associates our architect is here. We would request your approval thank you. Johnson: Thank you Mr. Exley, any questions of the applicant? Is there anyone else from the public that would like to address the Commission on this application from the Sandpiper Restaurants? Sale: Mr. Chairman, we have not reviewed this application yet but it appears that our tentative at this time our tenative recommendation is that the extension of Central Drive not be approved. And that the restaurant take other access than as proposed by their site plan. We will be meeting with the applicant Friday Morning to discuss this further. For the Commissions Information that is the tentative recommendation of ACH© staff. Johnson: As long as you are informing us of that, could you detail any reasons for not wanting to do that? Sale: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, it involves the design of that entire intersection of Meridian Road, East 1st, our extension of Corporate give to East 1st I mean from East 1st to Meridian and the need to de-emphasize travel or traffic at the Central Drive intersection. I can't give you a more technical explanation than that. But it will be included in our staff report when it is prepared by Friday. Johnson: Thank you, any questions of Mr. Sale? Crookston: I just have one, ACRD. Commissioners will act on that Friday did you say? . Sale: Mr. Chairman, Commissioners, Mr. Crookston, the Commission v~ll act on it next Wednesday noon. The ACRD staff will meet with the applicant this Fti~iay morning, this coming Friday morning. Crookston: Thank you Exley: We are aware of the technical meeting that took place the other day and we are really having a major problem with this and are going to try and use ~@ of our devices to have ACHD help us with the entrance as it is drawn on our presentafion. I would like to have Charlie Gongre come up for one moment he has a traffic report that has been done by the Nahas people on Cerrtral Valley Corporate Park and let him just point out a couple of things if you please. Charlie Gongre, Roylance, 4619 Emerald, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 12, 1995 Page 15 Gongre: The developer, Bob Nahas, has hired Bell Walker traffic engineers to do a traffic study of the area including this intersection that we are dealing with. We will present this to Larry Sale and Terry Little or anyone else within ACRD in order to review the aspects and the recommendations (End of Tape) Bell Walker traffic engineers did recommend an intersection that would bring traffic from 4 directions and not just three. We will discuss that with ACRD at this meeting, but it has been recommended that an X type intersection would be better than a T intersection by~ the engineer. Johnson: We appreciate that information thank you. Before I close the public hearing is there anyone else that would like to comment? Are there any questions the Commission would like to ask? Crookston: Mr. Chairman, (would-like to have the Commissions feelings as to what they want to do, whether or not they want to have this tabled until we have ACRD comments and Bell Walkers comments. Or do you want to leave the record open only for those two recommendations so that they can be included in the findings of fact. Or do you just want to continue it until you receive them and have it and had a chance to review them. Johnson: You are going to present them on the 20th is then when the Bell Walker study will be done by then, you will preser~ it then, is that correct. Oh it is done now, when will you present it to ACRD to discuss it with them, on Wednesday the 20th? (Inaudible) Johnson: The meeting Friday, I thought Mr. Sale said you were going to bring that up on the 20th. Sale: Mr. Chairman, the staff tech review meeting will be Friday morning it would be very advantageous to us if we had benefit of the study tomorrow so that we can review it before our Friday meeting. The purpose of the meeting Friday would be to finalize staffs recommendation to the Commission which will meet on Wednesday the 20th to render a decision for the Highway District. Johnson: Thank you, that clarifies my misunderstanding. And I am assuming you can make that study available for them by tomorrow? We have several options here as a Commission on which ever way you would like to proceed. I will close the public hearing and invite you, Oh, you have something else you want to add, I have to reopen the public hearing. Exley: If it would help, because this is very important to us that vie have a 4 way intersection and we feel confident with this report that we have that we can convince • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 12, 1995 Page 16 ACRD to do this if it will help you. I will say that we will meet all ACRD requirements and we will leave the ball in our court to work it out so that you don't have to. Johnson: I think that is a fair proposal. I am sure Mr. Sale has some exciting options for you. In that regard then I will close the public hearing. We need a motion, which ever way you would like to go on that. Rountree: Mr. Chairman, imake emotion-that we have findings of feet and ccsAClu~sions • prepared on this with the record being opened until we are in receipt of and can inictude ~ the comments from Ada County Highway District. +~ Alidjani: Second Johnson: We have a motion and a second, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #15: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY FLAT FOR VALLEY CENTER MARKET PLACE BY W.H. MOORE COMPANY: Johnson: I will now open the public hearing, is Mr. Moore or the applicant's representative here? It looks like Becky Bowcutt. Becky Bowcutt, Briggs Engineering, 1111 South Orchard, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Bowcutt: Good evening, this is a preliminary plat on a property located an Overland Road adjoining I-84 to the north. It is just west of Kuna Meridian Road. The Sandman Motel, the new Texaco and the JB's Restaurant lies on our east boundary. To our west boundary is the Mountain. View Equipment complex. This came before this body not too long ago as an annexation. If you recall a portion of the property was in the city limits currently zoned C-G and a portion was outside the city limits in Ada County's jurisdiction zoned C2. We asked for annexation so that we have a consistent zone throughout the whole property. Mr. Moore intends to develop this property. He had kicked around multiple ideas, commercial center, officer center. And we basically decided to proceed with the preliminary plat, it was listed under our conditions of approval of annexation that we would submit a preliminary plat and the development agreement would be tied to that. We are proposing exactly 25 buildable commercial lots on approximately 39 acres .The roadway you see there would be~a private drive area. The reason that we chose a private drive, we had some pre-application meetings with the City, some meetings with the Highway District with the Ada County Engineer and we basically wanted some flexibility. We found in these WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI S. STILES, P & Z Adm. PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney MEMORANDUM: HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 GRANT P. HINGSFORD Mayor To; Mayor, City Council, Planning & Zoning From; Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MOE ALIDJANI JIM SHEARER CHARLIE ROUNTREE TIM HEPPER September 7, 1995 Re; RESTAURANT, LOUNGE AND MICRO-BREWERY (Request for Conditional Use Permit - by Sandpiper Restaurants Inc. ) I have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, for your information and consideration as conditions of the Applicant during the hearing process: 1. Off-street pazking shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-2-414 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. 2. A drainage plan designed by an architect or engineer, licensed by the State of Idaho, shall _ be required for all off-street parking areas. The drainage plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. (Ord. 557, 10-1-91). 3. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as to not direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-2-414. D. 3 4. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standazds set forth in Sections 11-2-414. D. 4 and 11-2-414. D.5 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. 5. All Signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in 2-415 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. 6. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 7. Sanitary Sewer and Water to this facility would be via. mains that were installed as part of the Central Valley Corporate Pazk Subdivision. Assessment fees for sewer and water service will be determined during the building plan review process. Please provide any information that you may. have with regards to your anticipated water demand. C: \ WPWIN60\GENERAL\SANDPIPR. P&Z WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI S. STILES, P & Z Adm. PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney MEMORANDUM • ~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA CITY OF MERIDIAN MAX YERRINGTON R WALT W. MO OW 33 EAST IDAHO P & Z COMMISSION MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 MOE ALIDJANI Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 JIM SHEARER Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 CHARLIE ROUNTREE TIM HEPPER GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TO: Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor and Council FROM: Shari L. Stiles, Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: September 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Application for Conditional Use Permit for a Full Service Restaurant, Lounge and Micro-Brewery by Sandpiper Restaurants 1. This project would utilize a portion of an existing lot that is being replatted, along with the vacation of Headway Court through the Ada County Highway District. 2. Detailed landscaping plans will be reviewed during the building permit process. A minimum of one (1) three-inch (3") caliper tree is required for each 1,500 square feet of asphalt. 3. Handicap parking facilities shall be installed in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, including appropriate signage. 4. Our current ordinance would require only 36 parking spaces; 63 are shown. This would be slightly lessened by handicap stalls required. Ordinance should be revised to require a minimum of one (1) parking space for every two (2) seats for restaurants. Apparently there will also be parking spaces available from adjacent development. 5. This would be a welcome addition to the City of Meridian! I wholeheartedly recommend approval. • BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COI~II~tISSION SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS INC. AND R. T. NAHA3 CO. OF IDA8O CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ' NE CORNER OF CENTRAL VALLEY.DRIVS MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled conditional use permit application having come on for consideration on September 12, 1995, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Planning and Zoning Commission having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant appearing through Landon Exley, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That a notice of a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for September 12, 1995, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the September 12, 1995, hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That the property is located within the City of Meridian; that the property is located in the Central Valley Corporate Park FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 1 SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS - ROBERT W. NAHAS • • • s and is on the northeast corner of Central Valley Drive and Progress Avenue and is described in the application which description is incorporated herein. 3. That the property is currently zoned C-G, General Retail and Service Commercial; that the owners Central Valley Corporate Park of Central Valley Corporate Park were granted a conditional use permit in 1988 to develop the property in a mixed use fashion as a planned unit development-general; that the conditional use required that development be controlled and guided by design review and Section 11-9-607, Planned Development. 4 . That the zoning of General Retail and Service Commercial, (C-G) is defined in the Zoning Ordinance at 11-2-408 B. 11. as follows: (C-G) General Retail and Service Commercial: The purpose of the ( C-G ) District is to provide for commercial uses which are customarily operated entirely or almost entirely within a building; to provide for a review of the impact of proposed commercial uses which are auto and service oriented and are located in close proximity to major highway or arterial streets; to fulfill the need of travel-related services as well as retail sales for the transient and permanent motoring public. All such districts shall be connected to the. Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian, and shall not constitute strip commercial development and encourage clustering of commercial development; 5. That the R. T. Nahas Co. of Idaho is the owner of record of the property; that the owner has submitted a consent to this application. 6. That the property is located on a portion of Lot 1, Block 6 in Central Valley Corporate Park consisting of 1.06 acres. 7. That the proposed use by the Applicant is stated to be to FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 2 SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS - ROBERT W. NAHAS ! ~ i i construct a restaurant containing 6, 924 square feet that will be of a barn style architecture; that the total seating capacity will be 228 and parking spaces totalling 63 as required per the City's ratio of 160: 8. Mr. Exley testified that Sandpiper Restaurants accepts the conditions of the City staff. 9. That Mr. Sale, of the Ada County 8ighway District, testified that ACRD staff have not yet reviewed this application but that it appears that the tentative recommendation is that the extension of Central Drive not be approved; that the restaurant take other access than as proposed by their site plan; that the de- emphasizing of travel and traffic on East 1st and Meridian Road is in consideration; that the ACHD .staff would be meeting Friday, September 22, 1995, and will submit their recommendations to the City Commissioners. 10. Charlie Gongre, of Roylance Engineers, testified that the Developer, Bob Nahas, hired Bell Walker traffic engineers to do a traffic study of the area including the intersection at East 1st and Meridian Road; that Bell Walker traffic engineers did recommend an intersection that would bring traffic from four (4) directions and not just three; that an X type intersection would be better than a T intersection; that this will be discussed with the staff of ACRD at this meeting, September 22, 1995. 11. Mr. Exley testified that a four (4) way intersection is very important, that he is confident with the Bell Walker report FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 3 SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS - ROBERT W. NAHAS • and would go so far to say that the developer-will meet all ACRD requirements and will leave the ball in Nahas's court to work it out. 12. That there was no testimony in opposition to this application. 13. That the Meridian Planning and Zoning Administrator, Shari Stiles submitted comments; that this project would utilize a portion of an existing lot that is being replatted, along with the vacation of Headway Court through the Ada County Highway District; that detailed landscaping plans will be reviewed during the building permit process; that a minimum of one (1) three-inch (3") caliper tree is required for each 1,5000 square feet of asphalt; that handicap parking facilities shall be installed in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, including appropriate signage; that current ordinance requires only 36 parking spaces; 63 are shown; that the Ordinance should be revised to require a minimum of one (1) parking space for every two (2) seats for restaurants. 14. That the Assistant City Engineer, Bruce Freckleton, submitted comments, stating that off-street parking paving and stripping,.a drainage plan, signage and outside lighting shall all be provided in accordance with City Ordinances; that all construction shall conform to the requirement of the Americans with Disabilities Act; that sewer and water assessments will be determined during the building plan review process. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 4 SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS - ROBERT W. NAHAS • • 15. That Central District Health Department, Meridian Police Department and Meridian City Fire Department submitted comments and they are hereby incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 16. That proper notice has been given .as required by law and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission have been given and followed. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural. requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met. including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to grant conditional uses pursuant to 67-6512,. Idaho Code, and, pursuant to 11-2-418 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian. 3. That the City of Meridian has authority to place conditions on a conditional use permit and the use of the property. pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and pursuant to 11-2-418(D) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian, Idaho. 4.That 11-2-418(C) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian sets forth the standards under which the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council shall review applications for Conditional Use Permits; that upon a review of those requirements and a review of the facts presented and the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 5 SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS - ROBERT W. NAHAS •• conditions of the area, concludes as follows: • • the Planning and Zoning Commission a. The use, would in fact, constitute a conditional use and a conditional use permit is required by ordinance. b. The use should be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. c. The use apparently would be designed and constructed, to be harmonious in appearance with the intended character of the general vicinity. d. That the use would not be hazardous nor should it be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. e. The property has sewer and water service available. f. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and the use would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The use would not involve a use, activity, process, material, equipment or conditions of operation that would be detrimental to person, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic or noise. h. That sufficient parking for the property and the proposed use will be required. i. The development and uses will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. 5. That all ordinances of the City of Meridian must be met, including but not limited to, the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code,. Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Electrical Code, the Fire and Life Safety Code, all parking and landscaping requirements and the comments of the Planning and Zoning Administrator and the City Engineers office must be met and complied with. 6. .That the parking must meet the City Ordinance and be FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 6 SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS - ROBERT W. NAI3AS •~ • • paved, the landscaping placed, and any outdoor storage and/or trash receptacles properly screened, all done prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. 7. That any requirements of the Ada County Highway District shall be complied with and met. 8. That the use shall be controlled and guided by design review and Section 11-9-607, Planned Development. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves. these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER VOTED COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE VOTED COMMISSIONER SHEARER VOTED COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI VOTED_~' '~ CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER). VOTED DECISION AND RECOI~IIKENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends. to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant for the property described .in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. MOTION: APPROVED ~ ~~ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS - ROBERT W. NAHAS DENIED Page 7 OFFICIALS • • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY GOUNGIL MEMBERS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk A GOOd PI3C8 t0 L1Ve ~ RONALD R. TOLSMA JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer w ~ S i CITY OF MERIDIAN MAX YERRINGTON BRUCE D STUART, Wat er o "s Supt. WALT W. MO ROW JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. P & Z COMMISSION SHARI S. STILES, P & Z Adm. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 JIM JOHNSON Chairman PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 , MOE ALIDJANI KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON Police Chief Public WotksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 JIM SHEARER , WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 CHARLIE ROUNTREE TIM HEPPER GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning Sz Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: September 5, 1995 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 8/21/95 HEARING DATE: 9/12/95 REQUEST: Conditional Use for full service restaurant, lounge and micro-brewery BY: Sandpiper Restaurants Inc. LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT:__ NE comer of Central Valley Drive and Progress Ave JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P2 CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8~ FINA LAT) BUREAU OF REC RELIM F AL PLAT) CITY FILES / ~ _ ~ YOUR ~~~, AUG 2 5 1995 CITY GI" ,~~~;d~3IA~f WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., Clty Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI S. STILES, P 8 Z Adm. PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney • • COUNCIL M HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY EMBERS A Good Place t0 Live RONALD R. TOLSMA CITY OF MERIDIAN MAX YERRINGTON WALT W. MORROW 33 EAST IDAHO P ~ z coMMlssioN MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 MOE AUDJANI Public WorksBuilding Departrnent (208) 887-2211 JIM SHEARER Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 CHARLIE ROUNTREE TIM HEPPER GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning 81 Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by:_September 5. 1995 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 8/21/95 HEARING DATE: 9/12/95 REQUEST: Conditional Use for full service restaurant lounge and micro-brewery BY: sandpiper Restaurants Inc. LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: NE corner of Central Valley Drive and Progress Ave JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY -CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES ~~ OTHER: / YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: rob .e-,-..-. i t t~_ CoN i i a•,~.4-C-. u. SE ~ F' /4 L L O PS [.c~A- o~ Sus0~0 y S i4~u D ~' RECEIVED G~,~~~? ~~~- auc 2 s ~ss5 ~~~~ C:1`~`Y (1~ t~litK~~~rt~ . +. i • ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY D] Development Services D'visio Development Application~ort MCU-15-95 -Progress n/o Central Valley, City of M i Restaurant, lounge &micro-brewery The applicant is requesting conditional use approval r a micro-brewery . The site is located on the east t Valley Drive. This development is estimated day. Roads impacted by this development: Progress Avenue no '~ designation restaurant, lounge and ue just north of Central oral vehicle trips per ACHD Commission Date -February 14, 1996 - 7:00 p.m. .. ranklin c m ~ N ~at~ ~ t ~ e~~ y ~ S 84 ITE Overlan d N W E S . ri ~ t `' ~~on recvsc ..turo~o I • /'1 J~~ _~~~~~~~ ~-DA PL,4NNIN~ A ;~N. SAP 1413 NorF u~w C--G y(a1 /~/`~ ', ;< - :;~~ - _ __ ,, . -..- ~ ~fl~ , _ -, 1~ / // % c -(~y, %~s. Iy , w . _ _ --5,.89~Q0~ E 7 , ~~ ~ L a . ~ ~ ,'Y 4 \ ~~ l _ '171.84' f ~ ~G ~~ ~~~ o~l - - iii IQi _ i ` ~ -: ~ tiF 40• ACCESS AND '~' ~ ~ ~- ~~. ,, ~,~ ,y s~ ~ - ' ~ , ~v~ Q~ ~ (! 1! UTILITY EASEMENT ryy"'• 2 ~ '~ n4 j ~ ~ ~- _ - „ / ; < a,. ' ~- ~~ ~ ~ ~ VACATION OF HEADWAY N ~ ~' ~ 2~ ._ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~i - COURT (PUBUC STREET) ' ~ ~ 'S " ;f~~ ~L - -5.c \ ~ a~'"~4 ~R~c --. p /.. ~. ~. / 5. ~~ 219.45' ~ •~ •.. J ~, " BL~"CK 2 `'ry ~ - "` ~ ~ % ~'N. .- _ 8~ 200.00' 178.52' ! I. ~ N \ 3 ~ ~-~.~ ,, ~~ N 90'00'00' W °4:.~ ----- - - 620.75' \. 'YS~~ -_- --' , ~ :-'~ ~~ ; 1~+1 - _ ~ ; := ;K , LOCK 2 ~ ~. w 4 _ _ _ ~~ ' '. '~ iii \\~ .~ ~Nw r ~ ~.. NOTES 1 BUILDING SETBACKS IN THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPUCABIE ZONING REGULATIONS OF THE GTY OF MERIDIAN. AND THE 'AMENDED DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR (2=NTRAL VALLEY CORPORATE PARK", (FILED AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 8934034, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTRY, IDAHO), AND THOSE CENTRAL VALLEY CORPORATE PARK DESIGN STANDARDS" AS REFERRED TO IN SaD AMENDED DECLARATION. 2 al DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT. 3 ALL LOT ONES COMMON TO A PUBUC RIGHT OF WAY HAVE A TEN (10) F00T WIDE PERMANENT PUBUC UTILITIES, DRAINAGE, IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPE EASEMENT UNLESS OTHERNASE SHOMN. 4 DEVELOPER SHALL COMPLY MATH IDAHO CODE SECTION 31-3805 RELATING TO IRRIGATION RIGHTS, TRANSFER, AND OiSCIOSURE. 5 ANY RESUBDIV1510N ~ THIS PLAT SHal COMPLY N1TH THE APPLICABLE ZONING REGULATIONS IN EFFECT AT THE TA1E OF THE RESUBDIViS10N, OR AS ALLOWED. BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. t N • E wa ~.~.~. ,.,r,,,~.. ~w s..W ~._.. r'~ ..- I W _~ 1L . .; 'f CE PITRAL ~~ ~R~vE ~ ~ LLl oL OC t~- ~ C 0 I ~ ~{ i i ~ ~ ~' ~' ~ ~ ~ ~{ ~ ~~~ ~~! 'I ~i~ i~,ii~ !~` ;I - I ;i:r.i ;,i~~ i •_ _ ,. G ~~ Q C --r ~s ~~M'M~ _~. a,~ ...L~Ev~I. PRnPosE~ (Zo/IDV~lAY a .. ~ ~~ ~ '3~~s ,~~€a g ~a~~ ~' t ~. v~ s u Q~ ~o ~~ 3 ~~ ~~ ~~ Facts and Findin A. General Information Impact Fee Benefit Zone Progress Avenue Local commercial street with from centerline) ith a 41-foot street section with curb, gutter and no with no pathway designation Headway Court has not been improved. The District is in process of reviewing an application to vacate the right-of--way for Headway Court. If the vacation is approved, there will be no requirements for street improvements. If the vacation is not approved, this site's frontage on Headway Court will be required to be improved to the standard required in the District's report for the preliminary plat of Central Valley Corporate Park. B. The project is proposed to be developed on a portion of Lot 1, Block 6, Central Valley Corporate Park No.2 (proposed Lot 17, Central Valley Corporate Park No.6), abutting Progress Avenue. C. No direct lot access is proposed from Progress Avenue. The site plan proposes two driveways on Headway Court and 9 parking stalls with direct perpendicular access to Headway Court. If Headway Court is not vacated, the parking stalls would need to be eliminated and the driveways would need meet the District's offset requirement of 50- feet and driveway width requirements. D. Additional access is proposed on the south side of the parcel. As part of a larger development proposal to be reviewed in the future, a private road or driveway is proposed along the site's south boundary to create a 4-legged intersection with Progress - Square feet of proposed building - Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) MCU1595. WPD Page 2 60-feet existing right-of--way (30-feet from centerline) Avenue and Ce'1ZEt~a1 Drive. The private road would provide and a major wholesale grocery store to be located southea grocery store has not yet been reviewed by the Di, 'ct. Progress/Central intersection are required tom the e into a 4-legged intersection. These changes ar iscus be E F The original master plan for the Central Val commercial, office, and light industrial land conducted and the roadway system was desi Under the original land use plan the Ce generate approximately 16,000 daily cle The revised land use plan for office; however, the commer~ anticipated in the original roadway syst~ ~ ~ ~. s de ' s land use plan ~ tral ~~ approximately 1 ily v proposed reco amount of c sidewalk new o the subject site site. The proposed in the design of the to Park included a mix of r plan traffic study was to ticipated traffic needs. iy Co e Park was estimated to ojec chide a same land uses of commercial, omp ent fo a revised plan is much larger than A affic study was conducted and the ~ mee ~ ticipated traffic needs. Under the revised orporate Park was estimated to generate .ips, with most of those vehicles using the ~- ntral intersection. Because of the increase in the lent, the District has been requiring the construction of i Central Valley Corporate Park. When : istrict or' lly approved Central Valley Corporate Park Subdivision, it G. The original subdivision was planned with a "T" type intersection for the Central Valley Drive/Progress Avenue location with a stop sign on the two Progress Avenue approaches. The intersection has been constructed as "T" type intersection and operates without any traffic control. The current traffic volumes do not justify the installation of stop signs. H. Staff required an updated traffic study to identify the impacts of the proposed changes in land use and to justify the revised roadway network. The key findings of the revised traffic study include: was ml o a higher mix of light industrial uses. Sidewalks were not required on the " se of the industrial uses. Because the subdivision is actually developing with commercial, retail, and food service businesses, staff recommends that sidewalk be required on the street(s) abutting this site. i. The revised traffic volumes show approximately 13,000 eastbound daily vehicle trips at the proposed 4-legged Central Valley Drive/Progress Avenue intersection, most of them related to the proposed major grocery store. ii. Because of the heavy east-west traffic flow, Traffic Services has determined that the Central Valley Drive/Progress Avenue intersection will require stop signs at the Progress Avenue approaches. iii. The intersection of Central Valley Drive/Progress Avenue will require a free eastbound right-turn lane to southbound Progress Avenue. A high volume of traffic (405 pm peak hour trips) is anticipated at build-out conditions for the MCU1595.WPD Page 3 eastbou~ right-turn lane. This added turn lane needed ' e delay for the higher volume movements and allow the inters ~ 'on ~ ope~~ra~te at an acceptable level of service. Staff has dete ed ''' added right-turn lane I. The added right-turn lane will requir iti - ®ay from the restaurant property at the southwest comer of a Ce al rogress intersection (McDonalds). The applicant ha . mi ale of intent from the restaurant owner that supports the sale of then ~ ri of-w nder specific conditions. Staff recommends that the right- y for.,. ane be required with this application at no cost to th F ~ ' ict. J. The existing met .~~ ent y Drive should be extended to a point approximately 2~ "` eat' oft ` ; ast First Street stop bar. This median is needed to control left- movem ~ the two westerly driveways on Central Valley Drive. This will ohibit left tur~ out of the McDonald's store at a driveway .located less than 110-#~eet from East~,lst Street. (The location does not meet current District K. The ap~^ proposed will create a 4-legged intersection at Progress Avenue and Central Drive; however, construction of the eastbound right-turn on Central Drive, extension of the median in Central Drive, and reconstruction of Central Drive to 6 traffic lanes will not be necessary until traffic volumes exceed 4,000 vehicle trips per day on Progress Avenue south of Central Drive or 2,000 vehicle trips per day on the new driveway on the east side of Progress Avenue (aligned with Central Drive). L. With the proposed revisions, the transportation system will be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposed development. M. This application was scheduled for a public hearing by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission on September 12, 1995. The following requirements are provided to the City of Meridian as conditions for approval: Site Specific Requirements: 1. No direct lot access is proposed or approved from Progress Avenue. 2. Receive approval of the vacation of Headway Court from the District. If the vacation of Headway Court is not approved, submit a revised site plan to Development Services to be reviewed and approved by the Commission. The site plan shall be revised to MCU1595.wPD Page 4 show the drive~ys on Headway Court in conformance~6ith the D' ict's offset requirements. .~ 3. Utility street cuts in the new pavement on Progre ~Avenue~ ;€ t be allo d unless approved by the District Commission. 4. Construct 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Pr = venue abutting the site. 5. Construct a 41-foot curb return approach wi 5-foo Progress Avenue in alignment with Central Drive. This driv 1 be p ~,, ~ 40-feet wide and a minimum of 30-feet beyond the sidev~T_ on '_' __ nue. 6. Two stop signs should be Avenue approaches. s expense on the two Progress 7. Dedicate by waz~anty dee` - o a 5 ~ 55-foot right-of--way triangle (or appropriate curve `~~_ the so t comer of Progress Avenue and Central Drive to keep street im~ravements ~~ ittun the :public right-of--way prior to District approval of or i~suanr~ o ~ ~-bu~tiitt€~rits;'right-of-way work permits (or other required permits) whiche e J mes first. The owner will ~ be compensated for this additional,~tght-of--way. ~A 8. Obtain a~~tter from t owner of McDonald's restaurant stating that they understand and agree:,, - i ht-o ~. ,-~ at the northern driveway on Progress Avenue will be elimuiated in the future. 9. Aright-of--way permit must be obtained from ACHD for any street or utility construction within the public right-of--way. Utility cuts should be combined where practical to limit pavement damage. Contact Construction Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file number) for details. Standard Requirements: 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the Development Services Supervisor. The request shall specificall identi each requ~rPmPnr ro be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hard iD or i i Requests received prior to the date scheduled for Commission action shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. 2. A request for an appeal of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Development Services Supervisor within 15 calendar davs of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The appeal will be scheduled to be heard by the MCU1595. WPD Page 5 Commission w~n 20 calendar days after receipt. 3. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for d appropria a action by ACRD 4. Locate drivewa is a of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when ,,, r~ driveways are no ~~ ~~~ "°~ ~ red ~f the adjacent property. prior to issuance of building permit (or other 'ts). The proposed drainage system shall retain all storm water -site a " onform to the requirements of Meridian. Public street drainage facilities sha a loc d blic right-of--way or in a common lot owned by an owner _' "' saci ` n set i e specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bush '~~ ed$; r oth valuable amenities placed in said easement. Drainage lots an it us ns shall be noted on the plat (when applicable).. 5. Constructs : destrian raid the corner of all street intersection in compliance with Idaho GQ ~ e, Section 40-~'3 ~ 5. 6. Dedica~' ' x fight-of--way triangle (or appropriate curve to keep street improve the public right-of--way) at all intersections abutting and/or within the development prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits). 7. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across parcel. 8. Provide written approval from the appropriate irrigation drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 9. If street improvements are proposed, locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drainage ditches and appurtenances, etc.) outside of the public right-of--way, as may be required by the District. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. 10. Locate proposed sign(s) out of the public right-of--way and out of the clear-vision sight- triangle of all street and driveway intersections. 11. The developer is required to install street name signs at the locations approved by the Ada County Highway District. Purchase street name signs, sign poles, and mounting hardware from ACHD's Traffic Operations Department or an approved outside supplier. The District will not manufacture street signs until a copy of the recorded plat showing the recording data has been provided to Development Services staff. MCU 1595. WPD Page 6 12. Provide a clear ion sight triangle at all street intersec~ns. Wi this triangle no obstruction higher than 36-inches above the top of paveme ~ w' a allowed, including landscaping, berms, fences, walls or shrubs. The ' 'ang be defined by the long leg measured down the centerline of any collect, 0-fe ~ short 1 measured down the centerline from the collector street c line eet. es on the plat and street construction plans of these res 13. Submit three sets of street construction plans t for review and appropriate action. 14. Provide design data for proposed acc o a or review and appropriate action by ACHD. 15. All public streets and drainages ";;, emsx ~ all b $` esigned and constructed in conformance with District eta ° ards ' ~ s. 16. Specificatioris° ° rve s, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations pre AC r be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional E "' ~ ofes~' 1 Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54- 17. The appiidant shall sub ~it revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit: ~' other requ' d permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 18. Cons nd property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requiremen of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. Submitted bv: Date of Commission Approval: MCU1595. WPD Page 7 • N~~G^ ~'~2/~ S _ D.~~s~ ~ ,~ ,1 3 p-- i-~ ~ \~i a w ~, `-- wog ~o~~ ~ S ~~~ ~ 5~.~~~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~.~ ,w CENTRAL C •• DISTRICT ~1'rHEALTH DEPARTMENT Rezone # TRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DE Environmental Health Division ~, jet. e~..e~.~.s ~:~ ~i a.~ia.~ Return to: -~ U„, ^ Boise j' '' ~^ Ea le ^ Garden city Conditional Use # S~/yU ~'/~En ~S`Tl~f//Y1y/+~~ ~.,~ ~leridian ^ Kuna Preliminary /Final /Short Plat ^ ACZ ^ I. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ~- central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage ~ central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ~ central water 10. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ I I. Stormwater disposal systems shall be reviewed by relative to: ^ Waste Disposal ^ Injection Well rules. ^ Groundwater Protection ^ 12. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 13. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. 14. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ,®. 15. Date: ~/ /~,i .S'Tde~ll~i9'f~'X ,~j~/rE-G-~~lEWT' C'~!/1~7?/i4 l S" Reviewed By: - 1F~J 779~G/~?~ . fDHD ID/91 rcb, rev. I/9S RCVI heet CENTRAL • ~~. ~ DISTRICT • i~'HEALTH DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE • 101 N. ARMSTRONG PL • BCISE.10.83104-0825 • (Z08) 3755211 • FAX: 321.8500 To prevent and treat disease and disability; to promote healthy [ijestyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality of our environment. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT RECONIlbIENDATIONS We recommend that the first one half inch of stormwater be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: 1) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND, State of Washington Department of Ecology, February 19892 2) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER AND SITE DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT 3) CALIFORNIA BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE HANDBOOK Prepared by Camp Dresser and McKee, Lary Walker Assoc., Uribe and Assoc., Resources Planning Assoc. , for the Stormwater Quality Task Force 4) URBAN STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL Volume 3, Best Management Practices Stormwater Quality Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, Colorado Serving Valley, Elnwre, Boise, and Ada Counties Ada ~ toa. carry otec• wIC toisee • MeriQon Bnan ~ Otke enan Canty Omce Vatley counh Otis 707 K Mntt-ong Pl 1606 Rooert St. 520E Stn Sheet N. of B-virornurrd Neatlh P.O. Boa legit 8obe. D. 83701-0825 torte. ID. 83705 Mantas Hone. ID. 190 S xm Sheet E Mted tD. a'l03t Enwo. Headt- 317-1x99 Rt. 33x-3355 83611 Ph.587-xd01 Mantas Home. ~. Ph 63x7191 FanW gornr+~ 327.7600 121 Hendon Rd. 83017 Pn 587A?TS Mmrun¢ollorrs 327.7x50 Hendon, m. 836x2 t~k,habn: 32)ax60 Fn. 8880515 '+iAC::27.7x88 WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI S. STILES, P & Z Adm. PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chfef W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO P & Z COMMISSION MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 MOE AUDJANI Public WorksBuilding Departrnent (208) 887-22 JIM SHEARER Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-444I~~~O v ~® CHARLIE ROUNTREE TIM HEPPER GRANT P. xINGSFORD 2~3 AUG 1995 Mayor NAMPA ~ MERIDIAN TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON~~IITPROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by:~eaatember 5. 1995 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 8/21/95 HEARING DATE: 9/12/95 REQUEST: Conditional Use for full service restaurant lounge and micro-brewery BY:~r~dpiper Restaurants Inc. LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: _ _ NE comer of Central Valley Drive and Progress Ave JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P2 CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, CIC WALT MORROW, C/C -MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER -CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH ~NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) BI!REAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: o not a ieve this project will impact Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District; therefore, we have no further comments regarding this Conditional Use Permit. J(Shn P. Anderson, District Water Superintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District 5 E ~ 1 ~ 1ga5 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON CITY ®F MERIDIAN WALT W. MORROW APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian City Council hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on this ROLL CALL COUNCILMAN MORROW 6 ~ day of ~~~~ttCvt , ~-99s.~ I qGb COUNCILMAN ~3CNTL~-Y COUNCILMAN £-ARR+E-- r2.o~ N TtZC~ COUNCILMAN TOLSMA MAYOR KINGSFORD (TIE BREAKER) (INITIAL) APPROVED a-~~~~~ VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED DISAPPROVED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - `~G~h~~%~ei~ ~Qel{~u~h7~, ~n e . • Meridian City Council January 16, 1996 Page 17 Corrie: Motion is made and seconded that we remand the annexation and zoning back to Planning & Zoning, any further discussion? Motion on the floor, all those in favor say Aye? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #3: TABLED DECEMBER 19: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT, LOUNGE AND MICRO-BREWERY BY SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS: Corrie: Council, we have the findings of fact and conclusions of law on that, any discussion? Morrow: Mr. Mayor, that was originally tabled awaiting a presentation by a representative, 1 still want to hear that presentation. . Corrie: Very well Mr. Morrow, is the representative of Sandpiper here? Shari? Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council I had a conversation with Landon Exely of the Sandpiper this afternoon. He is in Laguna Beach and is unable to be here. However he indicated they have had traffic study which ACRD has basically prepared however we don't have their, ACRD has approved it we do not have their report. Part of it was for McDonald's to move a curb cut. Presently the approval for that curb cut removal or moving is stuck at McDonald's Headquarters. Mr. Exely would like to .wait to make a presentation so he makes sure what you see as a conditional use permit is what is going to be there. Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move to table to our first meeting in February. Bentley: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded that we table this conditional use permit until February 6th meeting, all those in favor say aye? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #4: TABLED DECEMBER 19, 1995: AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST FOR SALMON RAPIDS N0. 3 SUBDIVISION: Corrie: Council, you have those findings in front of you, any discussion? Hearing none I will entertain a motion if you so desire. • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: JANUARY 16.1996 APPLICANT: SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS ITEM NUMBER; 3 REQUEST; REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMR FOR FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT LOUNGE ANA MICRO-BREWERY AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS t,~ ~ q a~P ~~\o~ 1s. OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Meridian City Council December 19, 1995 Page 3 n ITEM #2: TABLED DECEMBER 5, 1995: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT, LOUNGE AND MICRO-BREWERY BY SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS: Tolsma: Being how I was not present at that meeting I am not sure what it was tabled for. Morrow. Mr. President, the motion to table was. made pending a presentation by the owner or his representative. This has been tabled several times. awaiting that presentation. We haven't yet seen a presentation, so that is why it is on tonight's agenda and off the table from December 5. Tolsma: Is there a representative here? Corrie: Mr. President, may I ask one question? Gary, there was also an extension of Central Drive by the Ada County Highway District, was that ever, what was the result of that, anything yet? Smith: Councilman Corrie, I haven't heard anything from the Highway District, I don't know whether Shari has or not. Stiles: Councilman Corrie and Council, Sandpiper was working with Ada County Highway District on getting an access that would have gone on to the extension of Central Drive over there. I didn't receive another letter today that they wanted it tabled again, but I believe that is the reason. This has been tabled so long because they are trying to work that out with Ada County Highway District. Morrow. Mr. President, I would move that we table item 2, the conditional use permit for a full service restaurant, lounge and micro-brewery by Sandpiper Restaurants until our meeting in January 16, 1996. Corrie: Second Tolsma: It has been moved to table the conditional use permit until January 16 for the Sandpiper Restaurant, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Corrie: Shari, can you make sure that somebody shows up that night from there, can you give them a call ITEM #3: TABLED DECEMBER 5, 1995: AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND Meridian City Council December 5, 1995 Page 6 MOTION CARRIED: All Yea • ITEM #5: TABLED NOVEMBER 21, 1995: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT, LOUNGE AND MICRO-BREWERY. BY SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS: Kingsford: I think we have a request there likewise for table to the December 19 meeting. Corrie: Mr. Mayor, is that in reference to this, (inaudible) because of this Central Drive trouble or is there something else involved here (inaudible). Kingsford: Well, did you get the letter Bob? You got the same thing that I am looking at. Shari, have you talked to anyone from Sandpiper? Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, I believe the main issue is ACRD also the person that would be presenting has not been in town. Corrie: Mr. Mayor I move that we table item #5 until December 19. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Max to table item #5 Sandpiper Restaurants until the December 19 meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #6: TABLED NOVEMBER 21, 1995: AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST FOR SALMON RAPIDS NO. 3 SUBDIVISION: Kingsford: Council had opportunity to review those amended findings. Morrow: What was our reason for tabling there? Kingsford: Was that the issue on 2 block lengths? What was this one. Counselor? McColl: The Council was about to pass on the amended findings of fact and conclusions of law for Salmon Rapids No. 3 and I believe the zoning ordinance and I put my foot into everybody's mouth and stood up just before the vote and said maybe you want to back off and have a look at them because I found that there were a couple of mistakes. In particular we had referred to moving the fence on Salmon Rapids No. 1. I went back to my office and • Meridian City Council November 21, 1995 Page 5 Kingsford: Do you need to do that or can we have them just (inaudible). Crookston: It is up to the Council. Kingsford: What is your decision Council; do you want those pages re-done? Morrow: I would prefer that from my standpoint. Kingsford: It looks like it is the will of the Council to have those re-done. Entertain a motion to have him prepare an ordinance. Yerrington: So moved Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to have the City Attorney prepare the annexation and zoning ordinance for Billy Quinn, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #3: TABLED NOVEMBER 8, 1995: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT, LOUNGE, AND MICRO-BREWERY BY SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS: Kingsford: We have a request for that to be tabled until the next meeting, is there a motion to that effect. Morrow: So moved Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to table item 3 until the next meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #4: TABLED NOVEMBER 8, 1995: AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST FOR SALMON RAPIDS NO. 3 SUBDIVISION: Kingsford: Any questions of the Council on those amended findings? • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: DECEMBER 5.1995 APPLICANT: SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS ITEM NUMBER; 5 REQUEST; Cf,NDIT10NA1.. USE PERMIT FOR A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT. LOUNGE AND MICRO BREWERY AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS 1 ~1~~ ~~To~. N ~' OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. x.~ ~ , a gib t'~ E-u~orat~f' ` , a, ,. ,Et:,) ~i~'!OG ~~~ -~1~4)0 ~~ :?'~' a ,t ,, ! a, ~. rr 11 RR'' a 1 ,~ ~ x + f tt r .~ ,1 _~ ~a , ..,.. ~:,,. •i - '~f„ S F ', C:'~M1~! h~ EN'1: >S: 1 ::~• ~ e .r~ 6 rr ...; ;:;. ,,: ;, --r: _...-..Wa~~0~1'~ ~r.~... .w:s~ ~~I .-~ ~ -r -~.~ ,.. ~ N ~.~~~ [' . ~, ass y. ( .• .. .i- .... ~. ...., 1 ~.. +.. ~ +M'Y ~t0..y-r ... .t n . .. . . ~....... • . ~. .I .... ~ ..w.. .. Jrr~• f- , ~' ~ +. r.,w..n... • ~S ~ ..~1.r..a~~r . .~.'rl n.LtY~s~V ~- v ~ f 1 I 4. ~ 1'!~ ~. l.Y . 6 ' ~ ~ ..: ra~rni. t4ttt4~~ttr~ , t f - C)E~ ~,A,Cit.S ~~~,~;~~ ~ J`. r ' :E t ~ , ~ ~~,; ~~, ?'CtJ1NSA+t!'!'i`tNt} Cf1~ RlV~+.A'!'~13M!~ N~ '~ ~ ~~ftia!r~s"~? ,1'. V I k o ~•:• DEC 05 '95 15 56 a ~ 1 > 4 ,.~ 1 ,. ~~,,~~,~ M.}..y{ ". r"'Y_~ 'SIG y ,~~.~ ~`(.'.+11~+!.l~fr~i~~lrrw J: ~ ` t '~ ~ ~'. 1l ,1 n+ ~ ' ~ • ..r.~..r.~ 'i~~y j .~V.-f •.r~....L. i~v1'•1n'.~~r•r ~.~vr f ili ,+ ~, ~ ~, `~~ ~ SEC a 5 ~ 1995 \~i+.}} ~-.11. I i .1. j t fe.+ , 1 u ,a; r .t ~ ,~ - ~~r f ~~ :~1 ~rr`= t ~~ PAGE.01 • • ~. ~®®~~ C O M P A N Y Real Estate Development 8150 EMERALD, SUITE 140 (83704) P0. BOX 8204 BOISE, IDAHO 83707-2204 September 12, 1995 Mr. Will Berg City Clerk For City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Meridian Industrial Business Park Dear Mr. Berg: TELEPHONE (208) 323-1919 I FAX 323-7523 I~IEC~1~'L~ 5 EP 1 4 1995 CITY OF MERIDIAN As you may recall, on September 8 we discussed our ability to secure a certificate of occupancy (Cofn) on a building currently under construction in the referenced park. This building is located at the southeast corner of Fifth and King Street and could be leased in the near future. However, as a condition to receiving an occupancy permit the owner must the the irrigation ditch located on the west side of this improved lot. This ditch is full and will remain so until October 15. We are currently talking to a prospective tenant and there is a possibility that same could take possession before October 15. The problem, as we discussed, is that the irrigation season makes it impossible to the the ditch until after the irrigation season is over and the ditch has dried out. Given these circumstances, it is my understanding that if the owner secures a tenant before we can commence work on the ditch, then the City of Meridian will require that the owner post a bond before a CofO shall be issued. Unless I hear form you otherwise, I will trust that this is your understanding of our conversation. Thanks for your cooperation in this matter. Sincer , J athan R. Seel or Meridian Industrial Park Partners (Owners) cc: Winston Moore • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: NOVEMBER 21.1995 APPLICANT: SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS ITEM NUMBER; 3 REQUEST; TABLED NOVEMBER 8.1995: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT. LOUNGE AND MICRO-BREWERY (TABLED AT APPLICANT'S REQUEST) AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMAAENTS ~~ ~~ ~ ,z~ ~~~~s~~ i~p~ ~~'' ~~ OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. 1.. ,. I • 1 1 1 I' . . 1 1 I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ / 1 1 ~7oylan~e ~c ~s c~c~tes l~.~ ~ t ~;; :" ;~:~~~ • ~vr,re•~r~r< • ,~'Ir~Cj~'ric.arlnCars 1. _,.. ,...,. .. ,f.~,.... ....:r .._~...~.. ~ ~..r`......~~.=..+......~.r.~..... ~...y.a:r+arr-.iri.`+,~ .~.K. 1 -..... 1 - ~. .. _.......-..__ ~~r.•,Pi ~~(,w:N: k;P 'r,:li..i ~' r:.Y!.e: ~C~G~(1 F,''y. ~ ~i~ad {~~,J.~y1.J~l~.l IL.1/,ii\:t•! 33:. F•}V i . ~ h ' .. - 1 ' 'Nav~~t,~r ~ 1, 1 ,S ' Prot l~u. 1653 , , ~ 1 , ..; ' ~ f 1 I i ~ ... ~ ~ ~ i ' ~3 ~, XQuhtt ~# M~di~n, ~~~;~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ 2 1 1~~5 C1TY~ DF l~ER1DIAN ~ti; C1WYN~ s ~A'i"1'i.'~ CO~P~;i~~~ ~ ~ 1 t)o~r Wil!• ~ ~ ~ t ~ ; 1 ~ • 1 1 ~ This l~~ will i-a we~ttmn a.~~i~s ~ f3~.Ctey wn~ the n~+olce ICitY you ~ a Them ~ti~1 t+on6e~t dr~~ ~ 1: ; Sincera~, ~ ; . , 1 ROYt.A1 e4 D AS~OGIA', ~";~. ~ ~ ' f~ ~ f~ ~.~~ 1 -,~ ' + ~ 1 Jf~.AN C~rA~A'W 7 1 ~ ; :e~ 1~ x~aa NOU 21 '95 12 00 - . 1, r . . i ~~ .'{ ~ r ~i , ~ ~ 1 t i i 1 J 1 1 • ... ~ 1 i ~ i 1 1 1 I 1 f ~ ~ 1 1• I 1 ~ X 1 1. ... 1~ 1 ~1 I 1 ~ i I . , 1 ~ . t 1 . . , i.. . y : I ~~ -1 I :, ' I , 1 PAGE.02 Meridian City Council November 8, 1995 Page 16 ~~ Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I would move that the City Council of the City of Meridian approve the conditional use permit requested by the applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law or similar conditions as found justified and appropriate by the City Council and that the property be required to meet the water and sewer requirements, the fire and life safety codes, uniform fire code and other ordinances of the City of Meridian. The conditional use permit should be subject to review upon notice to the applicant by the City and subject to the variance for the fence. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of the conditional use permit with the conditions stated, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #12: TABLED OCTOBER 17, 1995: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT, LOUNGE AND MICRO-BREWERY BY SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS: Kingsford: It is my understanding they contacted Shari and wish to be tabled again, am I correct? Stiles: Yes Mr. Mayor. Kingsford: And that is until the next meeting? Stiles: Yes Kingsford: Is there a motion to table that to the November 21 meeting? Yerrington: So moved Corrie: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Bob to table the Sandpiper (End of Tape) MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #13: TABLED OCTOBER 17, 1995: MARTY GOLDSMITH: REQUEST TO PHASE CONSTRUCTION IN LOS ALAMITOS N0.2 SUBDIVISION: • • Meridian City Council October 17, 1995 Page 66 ITEM #24: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FORA FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT, LOUNGE, AND MICRO-BREWERY BY SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS: Kingsford: Is there a member representative here for that? I was hoping to have breakfast there. Does staff have any comment on that? I know we have had some plan there for some time. Councilman do you want a presentation or are you satisfied with what is in your packet? Corrie: Mr. Mayor there was a comment about the extension of Central Drive by Larry Sale, he is not here tonight, he was but he left. Morrow: I really think to be consistent we ought to have someone make a presentation. Kingsford: Motion for table. Yerrington: So moved Morrow: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Walt to table this until the November 8 meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #25: MARTY GOLDSMITH: REQUEST TO PHASE CONSTRUCTION IN LOS ALAMITOS NO.2 SUBDIVISION: Morrow: Mr Mayor, during the break, Brian McColl slipped me a note that says feel free to table #25. Kingsford: You guys have never needed a note for that before. Morrow: We do now. Kingsford: Do you want to make that motion then? Morrow: So moved Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to table the request for phased construction in - - Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 10, 1995 Page 7 U Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council that the applicant apply for a variance of the height restriction and if that variance is granted that they approve the conditional use permit requested by the applicant. Hepper: Second Johnson: Moved and seconded to pass the recommendation onto the City Council with conditions stated, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #8: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT, LOUNGE AND MICRO-BREWERY BY SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS: Johnson: Any comments regarding these findings of fact? If there are none I will entertain a motion? Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these findings of fact. Rountree: Second Johnson: It has been moved and seconded that we adopt the findings of fact as written by the City Attorney, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Hepper -Yea, Rountree -Yea, Shearer -Yea, Alidjani -Absent MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: Recommendation or decision? Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the conditional use permit requested by the applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the findings of fact. Rountree: Second Johnson: It is moved and seconded we pass the recommendation onto the City Council Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 10, 1995 Page 8 as written, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #9: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CENTRAL VALLEY CORPORATE PARK NO. 6 BY BOB NAHAS: Johnson: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite the applicant or his representative to address the Commission. Kristina Donner, 3363 Buckboard Way, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Donner: We are requesting a preliminary plat on Central Valley Corporate Park No. 6. It is located, Central Valley Drive and Progress Avenue. It is basically a composite of a small portion of Central Valley Corporate Park No. 2, 3 and 4. It also incorporates a vacation of Headway Court. I would be glad to answer any questions that you may have. Johnson: Thank you, any questions of the applicant's representative at this time? Rountree: Had you discussed the vacation of the public street with Ada County Highway District? Donner: Yes, and it is my understanding that there is a meeting coming this Friday with ACRD. Rountree: Do you have a sense of what it is they have to say about it? Donner: At this time no. Crookston: Have you applied for the vacation? Donner: Yes, as far as I know we have. Johnson: Do you have any questions or would you like to give us any insight on our City's Engineer's comments, you have reviewed those I assume? Donner: Yes, we have reviewed the comments and we have no problems with any of the comments. I understand that there might be a discussion with ACRD about an entry driveway that is proposed for the Waremart site I believe which is adjacent to this property, it is to the so~:th. That is the only knowledge that !have that they passed onto me. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: OCTOBER 17.1895 APPLICANT: SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS ITEM NUMBER; 24 REQUEST; REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT. LOUNGE. AND MICRO-BREWERY A N Y CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: COMMENTS P ~ Z MINUTES FOR 9-12-95 SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW "REVIEWED" SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS r>~ 1 SETTLERS IRRIGATION: ~ tJ IDAHO POWER: ~ P US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: l ~ ~V OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: OCTOBER 10.1995 APPLICANT: SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS AGENDA I TEM NUMBER: 8 REQUEST: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT LOUNGE AND MICRO-BREWERY AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: COMMENTS FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ~~~ Imo" J rc~e~ Q 1° ~~1~. C~~~~ All Materials presenfied at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. • 5 C~OpI~ BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS. INC. AND R. T. NAHAS CO, OF IDAHO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NE CORNER OF CENTRAL VALLEY DRIVE MERIDIAN. IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled conditional use permit application having come on for consideration on September 12, 1995, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on-said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Planning and Zoning Commission having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant appearing through Landon Exley, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That a notice of a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public .hearing scheduled for September 12, 1995, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the September 12, 1995, hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, zadio and television stations. 2. That the property is located within the City of Meridian; that the property is located in the Central Valley Corporate Park FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 1 SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS - ROBERT W. NAHAS • • and is on the northeast corner of Central Valley Drive and Progress Avenue and is described in the application which description is incorporated herein. 3. That the property is currently zoned C-G, General Retail and Service Commercial; that the owners Central Valley Corporate Park of Central Valley Corporate Park were granted a conditional use permit in 1988 to develop the property in a mixed use fashion as a planned unit development-general; that the conditional use required that development be controlled and guided by design review and Section 11-9-607, Planned Development. 4. That the zoning of General Retail and Service Commercial, (C-G) is defined in the Zoning Ordinance at 11-2-408 B. 11. as follows: IC-G) General. Retail and Service-Commercial: The purpose of the ( C-G ) District is to provide for commercial uses which are customarily operated entirely or almost entirely within a building; to provide for a review of the impact of proposed commercial uses which are auto and service oriented and are located in close proximity to major highway or arterial streets; to fulfill the need of travel-related services as well as retail sales for the transient and permanent. motoring public. All such districts shall be connected to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian, and shall not constitute strip commercial development and encourage clustering of commercial development; 5. That the R. T. Nahas Co. of Idaho is the owner of record of the property; that the owner has submitted a consent to this application. 6. That the property is located on a portion of Lot 1, Block 6 in Central Valley Corporate Park consisting of 1.06 acres. 7. That the proposed use by the Applicant is stated to be to FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 2 SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS - ROBERT W. NAHAS • construct a restaurant containing 6,924 square feet that will be of a barn style architecture; that the total seating capacity will be 228 and parking spaces totalling 63 as required per the City's ratio of 160$. 8. Mr. Exley testified that Sandpiper Restaurants accepts the conditions of the City staff. 9. That Mr. Sale, of the Ada County Highway District, testified that ACHD staff have not yet reviewed this application but that it appears that the tentative recommendation is that the extension of Central Drive not be approved; that the restaurant take other access than as proposed by their site plan; that the de- emphasizing of travel and traffic on East 1st and Meridian Road is in consideration; that the ACHD staff would be meeting Friday, September_22, 1995, and will submit--their recommendations to the City Commissioners. 10. Charlie Gongre, of Roylance Engineers, testified that the Developer, Bob Nahas, hired Bell Walker traffic engineers to do a traffic study of the area including the intersection at East 1st and Meridian Road; that Bell Walker traffic engineers did recommend an intersection that would bring traffic from four (4) directions and not just three; that an X type intersection would be better than a T intersection; that this will be discussed with the staff of ACHD at this meeting, September 22, 1995. 11. Mr. Exley testified that a four (4) way intersection is very important, that he is confident with the Bell Walker report FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 3 SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS - ROBERT W. NAHAS • • and would go so far to say that the developer will meet all ACRD requirements and will leave the ball in Nahas's court to work it out. 12. That there was no testimony in opposition to this application. 13. That the Meridian Planning and Zoning Administrator, Shari Stiles submitted comments; that this project would utilize a portion of an existing lot that is being replatted, along with the vacation of Headway Court through the Ada County Highway District; that detailed landscaping plans will be reviewed during the building. permit process; that a minimum of one (1) three-inch (3") caliper tree is required for each 1,5000 square feet of asphalt; that handicap parking facilities shall be installed in accordance with .the Americans with Disabilities Act, including appropriate signage; that current ordinance requires only 36 parking spaces; 63 are shown; that the Ordinance should be revised to require a minimum of one (1) parking space for every two (2) seats for restaurants. 14. That the Assistant City Engineer, Bruce Freckleton, submitted comments, stating that off-street parking paving and stripping, a drainage plan, signage and outside lighting shall all be provided in accordance with City Ordinances; that all construction shall conform to the requirement of the Americans with Disabilities Act; that sewer and water assessments will be determined during the building plan review process. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 4 SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS - ROBERT W. NAHAS • 15. That Central District Health Department, Meridian Police Department and Meridian City Fire Department submitted comments and they are hereby incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 16. That proper notice has been given as required by law and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission have been given and followed. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to grant conditional uses pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and, pursuant to 11-2-418 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian. 3. That the City of Meridian has authority to place conditions on a conditional use permit and the use of the property pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and pursuant to 11-2-418(D) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian, Idaho. 4. That 11-2-418(C) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian sets forth the standards under which the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council shall review applications for Conditional Use Permits; that upon a review of those requirements and a review of the facts presented and the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 5 SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS - ROBERT W. NAHAS • conditions of the area, the Planning and Zoning Commission concludes as follows: a. The use, would in fact, constitute a conditional use and a conditional use permit is required by ordinance. b. The use should be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. c. The use apparently would be designed and constructed, to be harmonious in appearance with the intended character of the general vicinity. d. That the use would not be hazardous nor should it be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. e. The property has sewer and water service available. f. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and the use would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The use would not involve a use, activity, process, material, equipment or conditions of operation that would be detrimental to person, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic or noise. h. That sufficient parking for the property and the proposed use will be required. i. The development and uses will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. 5. That all ordinances of the City of Meridian must be met, including but not limited to, the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Electrical Code, the Fire and Life Safety Code, all parking and landscaping requirements and the comments of the Planning and Zoning Administrator and the City Engineers office must be met and complied with. 6. That the parking must meet the City Ordinance and be FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 6 SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS - ROBERT W. NAHAS paved, the landscaping placed, and any outdoor storage and/or trash receptacles properly screened, all done prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. 7. That any requirements of the Ada County Highway District shall be complied with and met. 8. That the use shall be controlled and guided by design review and Section 11-9-607, Planned Development. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE COMMISSIONER SHEARER COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI VOTED VOTED VOTED ~~ VOTED_~~¢~.~, f CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. MOTION: APPROVED DBNIF.D ~ ~ ~~ ~~ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 7 SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS - ROBERT W. NAHAS • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 12, 1995 Page 13 We operate in 14 states. Crookston: You operate in the US West states, the states they operate in. Smith: Correct, and so we probably have a couple thousand of these sites currently operating throughout our markets. There are a number of jurisdictions that will and have required (inaudible) location. We will accomodate the other people. Johnson: Any other questions of Mr. Smith? Are you aware of any publications on this subject? Would you make sure that Mr. Crookston gets on that mailing list. You wanted to address the Commission or did you get your questions answered? Is there anyone else that would like to address the Commission. At this time I will close the public hearing. What would you like to do with the pole? Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I move that have findings of fact and conclusions of law prepared for the request for cellular communication facility. Hepper: Second Johnson: Moved and seconded that we have the City Attomey prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law on the application from US West, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #14: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT, LOUNGE, AND MICRO-BREWERY BY SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS: Johnson: At this time I will open the public hearing~and ask that the representative for the Sandpiper Restaurants come before the Commission. Landon Exley, 1130 West Jefferson, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Exley: I am representing Sandpiper Restaurants here this evening and we are before you to seek your aprpoval of a full service, lounge and micro-brewery located in Central Valley Corporate Park on a portion of Lot 1, Blodc 6. The restaurant will be of a bam style architecture located on a pad consisting of 1.06 acres for 46,300 square feet. The gross square footage of the restaurant is 6,924 square feet with a total seating capacity of 228. We 63 on site parking spaces at your ratios is 160% of required. We accept the conditions and the submittal of the agencies as passed onto us. I would be happy to answer any questions for you. We have Charlie Gongre of Roylance our engineer is here Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 12, 1995 Page 14 and also Stan Olson of Olson and Associates our architect is here. We would request your approval thank you. Johnson: Thank you Mr. Exley, any questions of the applicant? Is there anyone else from the public that would like to address the Commission on this application from the Sandpiper Restaurants? Sale: Mr. Chairman, we have not reviewed this application yet but it appears that our tentative at this time our tenative recommendation is that the extension of Central Drive not be approved. And that the restaurant take other access than as proposed by their site plan. We will be meeting with the applicant Friday Morning to discuss this further. For the Commissions Information that is the tentative recommendation of ACRD staff. Johnson: As long as you are informing us of that, could you detail any reasons for not wanting to do that? Sale: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, it involves the design of that entire intersection of Meridian Road, East 1st, our extension of Corporate Drive to East 1st I mean from East 1st to Meridian and the need to de-emphasize travel or traffic at the Central Drive intersection. I can't give you a more technical explanation than that. But it will be included in our staff report when it is prepared by Friday. Johnson: Thank you, any questions of Mr. Sale? Crookston: I just have one, ACHD Commissioners will act on that Friday did you say? Sale: Mr. Chairman, Commissioners, Mr. Crookston, the Commission will act on it next Wednesday noon. The ACRD staff will meet with the applicant this Friday morning, this coming Friday morning. Crookston: Thank you Exley: We are aware of the technical meeting that took place the other day and we are really having a major problem with this and are going to try and use all of our devices to have ACHD help us with the entrance as it is drawn on our presentation. I would like to have Charlie Gongre come up for one moment he has a traffic report that has been done by the Nahas people on Central Valley Corporate Park and let him just point out a couple of things if you please. Charlie Gongre, Roylance, 4619 Emerald, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. ~ ~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 12, 1995 Page 15 Gongre: The developer, Bob Nahas, has hired Bell Walker traffic engineers to do a traffic study of the area including this intersection that we are dealing with. We will present this to Larry Sale and Terry Little or anyone else within ACHD in order to review the aspects and the recommendations (End of Tape) Bell Walker traffic engineers did recommend an intersection that would bring traffic from 4 directions and not just three. We will discuss that with ACHD at this meeting, but it has been recommended that an X type intersection would be better than a T intersection by the.engineer. Johnson: We appreciate that information thank you. Before I close the public hearing is there anyone else that would like to comment? Are there any questions the Commission would like to ask? Crookston: Mr. Chairman, I would like to have the Commissions feelings as to what they want to do, whether or not they want to have this tabled until we have ACHD comments and Bell Walkers comments. Or do you want to leave the record open only for those tv~ro recommendations so that they can be included in the findings of fact. Or do you just want to continue it until you receive them and have it and had a chance to review them. Johnson: You are going to present them on the 20th is then when the Bell Walker study will be done by then, you will present it then, is that correct. Oh it is done now, when will you present it to ACRD to discuss it with them, on Wednesday the 20th? (Inaudible) Johnson: The meeting Friday, I thought Mr. Sale said you were going to bring that up on the 20th. Sale: Mr. Chairman, the staff tech review meeting will be Friday morning it would be very advantageous to us if we had benefit of the study tomorrow so that we can review it before our Friday meeting. The purpose of the meeting Friday would be to finalize staffs recommendation to the Commission which will meet on Wednesday the 20th to render a decision for the Highway District. Johnson: Thank you, that clarifies my misunderstanding. And I am assuming you can make that study available for them by tomorrow? We have several options here as a Commission on which ever way you would like to proceed. I will close the public hearing and invite you. Oh, you have something else you want to add, I have to reopen the public hearing. Exley: If it would help, because this is very important to us that we have a 4 way intersection and we feel confident with this report that we have that we can convince . ~ ~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 12, 1995 Page 16 ACRD to do this if it will help you. I will say that we will meet all ACRD requirements and we will leave the ball in our court to work it out so that you don't have to. Johnson: I think that is a fair proposal. I am sure Mr. Sale has some exciting options for you. In that regard then I will close the public hearing. We need a motion, which ever way you would like to go on that. Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I make a motion that we have findings of fact and conclusions prepared on this with the record being opened until we are in receipt of and can include the comments from Ada County Highway District. Alidjani: Second Johnson: We have a motion and a second, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #15: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR VALLEY CENTER MARKET PLACE BY W.H. MOORE COMPANY: Johnson: I will now open the public hearing, is Mr. Moore or the applicant's representative here? It looks like Becky Bowcutt. Becky Bowcutt, Briggs Engineering, 1111 South Orchard, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Bowcutt: Good evening, this is a preliminary plat on a property located on Overland Road adjoining I-84 to the north. It is just west of Kuna Meridian Road. The Sandman Motel, the new Texaco and the JB's Restaurant lies on our east boundary. To our west boundary is the Mountain View Equipment complex. This came before this body not too long ago as an annexation. If you recall a portion of the property was in the city limits currently zoned C-G and a portion was outside the city limits in Ada County's jurisdiction zoned C2. We asked for annexation so that we have a consistent zone throughout the whole property. Mr. Moore intends to develop this property. He had kicked around multiple ideas, commercial center, officer center. And wee basically decided to proceed with the preliminary plat, it was listed under our conditions of approval of annexation that we would submit a preliminary plat and the development agreement would be tied to that. We are proposing exactly 25 buildable commercial lots on approximately 39 acres .The roadway you see there would be a private drive area. The reason that we chose a private drive, we had some pre-application meetings with the City, some meetings with the Highway District with the Ada County Engineer and we basically wanted some flexibility. We found in these • • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: SEPTEMBER 12.1995 APPLICANT: SANDPIPER RESTAURANTS AGENDA I TEM NUMBER: 14 REQUEST: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT. LOUNGE AND MICRO-BREWERY AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION l ~tl' COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS COMMENTS FORTHCOMING SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ~ ' ~ I~ i V ~AV/ y i 1 1 '~ J ~ ~ I ~.~ SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ` ~~~~ ~~ ~ u~"~" All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.