Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSciscoe, Michael & CindyOFFICIALS HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer CITY OF MERIDIAN GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. sHAwcaoFT, waste water supt. 33 EAST IDAHO KENNY W. BOWERS. Fire Chief MERIDIAN W.L. "BILL" GORDON. Police Chief ,IDAHO 83642 WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887.4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor , DATE• SCc~-+er„~~e.r- ~ , 9S PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING FOR: plspe~n (-Ii Its ~~.-}-,,N,¢,,,ti}'s CONTRACTOR: M~-SGO =~c.. COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R.TOLSMA MAk YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning t3 Zoning City of Meridian Superintendent of Waterworks: Bruce Stuart; Assistant Cln.:,~ ~udSo~n City of Meridian Superintendent of Wastewater Works: John Shawcroft; Project Inspect or -Tim Elliott. DRAWINGS OF RECORD: Either the Contractor or Developer is responsible to keep a record of changes to the construction approved drawings. These changes are noted on the plans by the Project Engineer and "Record Drawings" are submitted (3 sets) within 30 days after construction is complete. Subdivisions will not be accepted as final until "Record Drawings" are submitted to the Public Works Dept. -~ All plans being used on the job must be a City approved (stamped) set. Any changes to the approved plans must receive prior City approval. MEETING ATTENDANCE: Se.e.. ~-f-t-r^cl~-end L.~s-t- MERIDIAN STANDARD DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS: Current edition in possession of contractor? Yes ~ / No 1. SEWER" ~ 1. Contractor shall notify the Public Works Dept. (887-2211) when materials are on site. Call must me made a minimum of 24 hours prior to construction. 2. Pre-cast manhole bases are acce table fro p man approved manufacturer. If bases are cast-in-place the surface shall be trowelled smooth. ~e S} U~ e S~-e-~`r ~3. Trench water saonot be allowed into existing City sewer. ~. 12" of clean chips minimum required over pipe, 4" under i e. PP ~5. See attached letter regarding approval for weekend and/or holiday work and / inspection. v 6. No Fernco or Mission type cou lin s shall be used. P 8 Use shp type P.V.C. ~ couplings. `~ 7. Maximum invert elevation tolerance .10 ft. `~ 8. Service connections shall be marked with a 2 x 4 & finder wire a minimum of 4 ft. above ground and painted green. v 9. Use a minimum number of grade nngs on sewer manhole-maximum height = 12 inches. / 10. Maximum depth of sewer service at property line is 5 feet. Extend end of service 5 feet into the property. ~( ~.~~ ~~ ~ ~ ' p-v-}-~ ~ c± e. S.f .ywc~-v~~ 11. Air pressure test required mgr all underground utilities have been install ed. Please / schedule a minimum of 24 hours in advance. / 12. A visual inspection of the sewer manholes and lines will be made after final paving is completed to confirm all debris have been removed. 13. It is requested of the contractor pouring sidewalks to stamp the location of the / water & sewer service locations. 14. Any sewer pipe damaged during the installation of power, as, tele hone etc. s / be repaired by the sewer pipe contractor. g P ~ hall `~ 15. Contractor to do a walk through, after paving, before calling for an ins ection. P 16. Estimated construction schedule. Q'7' ~ S 9 -Za -~ S 2. ATE /1. Contractor shall notify Meridian Water Dept. (888-5242) when materials are on site. Call must be made a minimum of 24 hours prior to construction. ~2. Finder wire must be installed along the north and east side of all pipe. (See detail in Standard Drawings.) The City is to be notified, prior to the installation of the road base gravel, that the finder wire is ready for a continuity test. /3. Contractor needs to have finished conc. curb elevation data available at the time the meter tale is set, so that its' top elevation fits the back of sidewalk elevation. The depth from the lid to the top of the yoke mu t be within the tolerances ofd'" 3p"M~, . +z~~ :. ~ ~~Z , ~2.r .~; cx ~ cam. ~Ma.1~. ~ M..e,(-.-y /4. The Contractor shall disinfect, flush and obtain an appropriate number of water samples from the system for bacteriological testing. Disinfection is limited to 5 days maximum, then sampling and testing shall follow immediately. Test results must be submitted and accepted by the water superintendent prior to use of the system. Valve risers are to be fitted with locking lids. ~. Water Fittings can be cement-lined Ductile Iron or cement-lined Cast Iron. ~/ 7. Service line pigtails shall be extended straight out 8 feet with one then curving over into the adjacent lot 1 foot. Ends of service lines shall be marked with 2" x 4"s, a minimum of 4 feet above ground and painted blue. `~8. In paved areas, blowoffs shall have a maximum of (1) 4" and (1) 2" grade ring. ~. Contractor to do a walk through, after paving, before calling for an inspection. ~?-~ 10. The Contractor shall be responsible for providing continuous water service to all ~ existing water users affected by construction. '~ 11. It is recommended th~.t the developer or his representative do a walk through to verify conditions after each phase of construction. 13. Estimated construction schedule. ~ - ~ ~ `~ ~ ~-IS-~S' MISCELLANEOUS COMMENTS - PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING FOR ' DATE C~QS ci-1$-CjS ~-Z2 -~S ~oc~e~ ~j-t~S-SS ~i-ZZ-~S Tel e P ~e Se. r v ~ c.~. ~~.Q.~.c1 '~~ 12 -1- ~ -~'-~- See. 'Cape ~d ~o,,~sc~;p-1- -tv,~ ~dc1~~4:w~4\ DATE 9 - ~ - 9 S PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING FOR AS A ~-+~ ~~ l ~ 5 dQ ~c~r-1-~.~-~S ATTENDANCE LIST: NAME ~u c.2. ~i^-ec ~C.IIc..-E-t~ ,., ~~~i ~~ ~~i1ii~7`G/ f ` ~. `" '' G . ~~ ~Jr y4vi ~ve~~4~ ~lLvv- ~~P~. 1~Ir4T1~ l~ ~.,.i~v ~A-~tntr- WH-tT/~tA~J ~S ~ -~ RF_PRF+4FNT~ T ' ~/Nt Ii IN t ADD F S S. SIP _~sicl~~t ~2P'f' 1•w !~~-e... eri i $~~~fZ ~~<<~ ~~ -y~sy ~~~~~,,~~ -. , ~'L-o~nas ~u _ 41 ~ W. T,~dlao ____ ~, ~n~ SF SD R ~n 9 L ~ ~ /'?~i~J; A V. ~r+LTwt, /~ ~-~ ~ trcSA~(~ , ~?~ ~~1. z-~ ,~-N-o 5~ She, Z~ .~„sQ ~ %~ 3~7a z_ TELEPHOI~V ~~ ~ - - ZQ ~ ~Ax r ~ .~ .. 36~- 6 ~ ~z 31~z.--.~~5~ ,~~d ~S'.zL~2 88~-v181 3~3-gs7~ ~ZZ ~ 849T ~~$ - ~y 3 3 4s~5 ~- -YY 8'~S~ - Z z 3 ~~3 - `~7-7 A.~ ~'~- ~a b y l~ ~. b ~~5 fir/ ~ ~,~ ~ ~ .,99.9 ~~ ~~~ ~ , oa- PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING FOR ASPEN HILLS APARTMENTS 9-6-95 ATTENDANCE LIST: Bruce Freckleton, Meridian Public Works Department; Tim Elliott, Meridian Public Works Department; Chip Hudson, Meridian Water Department; Shari Stiles, Meridian P & Z Department; Daunt Whitman, Meridian Building Department; Bill Smith, MASCO, Inc.; Dion Connell, MASCO, Inc.; Don Egbert, IGC; John Hezeltine, IGC; Bryan Everman, Thomas Development Co.; Matt Munger, Hubble Engineering, Inc.; Wesley Bettis, Thomas Development Co.; A.J. Carlson, US West; Marvin Wallin, Marvin Wallin Construction: Freckleton: This is apre-construction meeting for Aspen Hills Apartments, we are recording this today just so we can transcribe minutes and get them out to everybody for better accuracy here of note taking, I'm a lousy note taker. We have the approved construction plans with the City stamp on it here and ready for distribution. Plans being used on the job need to have the city stamp on them. That way we can make sure it's a current set. Did everybody get signed up on the list? We will go through the sewer and water and get schedules set for that. Then we have some issues we need to talk about before we proceed with the rest of the schedule. MASCO is currently on site working on drainage, you figured you would be done with that in the next couple of days. Smith: It probably should be real close to being done out there today. Freckleton: When do you plan starting on sewer? Smith: Possibly tomorrow. Freckleton: How long do you anticipate that taking? Smith: Ten days, ten working days. Munger: So you will have all the storm drain done today? Smith: As far as the storm beds I think there will still be the outfall pipes to put in Freckleton: Okay that takes us out to about the 20th of September for sewer. As usual Bill when you get materials on site give us a call for a materials inspection. Pre-cast base and manhole sections are coming from Best Western. Just maintain your trench water if you have any don't let it down the pipe: Twelve inches of chip bedding over the pipe, four inches under. You did receive the letter for weekend and holiday work. We don't allow Fernco or Mission type couplings, any couplings shall be done with the PVC slip couplings. Maximum invert elevation tolerance is 10 foot. I guess we just do our standard service markers. Smith: That is still four foot above? From: Michael and Cynthia 2210 N. Meridian Rd. Meridian, ID 83642 884-0906 FAX To: Sheri Stiles Planning & Zoning April 30, 1996 Dear Sheri: We copied this out of the Zoning and Development Ordinance/1993 regulations. Would you please be so kind as to see if you can implement the stated requirements for tiling our ditch? This would be greatly appreciated. It would also be helpful if you could respond either by mail or FAX. This really helps us to remember details in conversations much easier. I'm afraid my memory is not much to speak of these days. Thank you so kindly. ,_ :r.~' ~' throu hout and Counciltshallt considersthel BicPclenPedestrian The Commission for Ada Count - y Design Manual reviewin (as Prepared by Ada county Highway District) when g bicycle and pedestrian pathway provisions within developments. (Ord. 430, 4-2-84) 9-605 M PIPING OF DITCHES Tiling of irrigation ditches, laterals or canals. di_... t_ch1 , laterals or canals All_ irri ation 3.ntersectin exclusive of natural waterways, g, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous, or which canals, ditches or laterals--touch either or both sides of the area being subdivided, shall be covered and enclosed with tiling or other covering equivalent in abilit to detour access to said ditch, lateral or canal. The City-may waive this requirement for covering such ditch, lateral or canal, if it finds that the .- public purpose requiring such will not be served in the individual case. Any covering program involving the distribution system of any irrigation district shall have the riot a of that affected district. No subdivision plat shall be approval where the subdivision is arbitrarily or artificially laid Poutvto avoid being adjacent to any waterway, irrigation. ditch, lateral or canal to which it would otherwise be naturally adjacent or which it would otherwise naturally include. . In the tiling of any irrigation or drainage ditch not within the jurisdiction of an irrigation or drainage district shall be completed so as not to impede the movement of the amount of water a crossing the property in the open ditch prior to development and the tiling of the ditch or canal. The sloped bar-grated inlet structure and access c lean outaboxesa at a maximum of.four hundred feet (400') spacing and at all angle points of the pipeline. ' Where .the-d' .under ..con the land being devPl~r n is on the boundar between d and adjacent land not owned b he developer or the owner of the land being deve o e the oundar p or is in fact Y. the__ditch_shall__still be tiled. The developer shall _, _ - - attempt to obtain the permission of the adjacent an owner to tile the ditch and attempt to have the adjacent an owner s are in the cost of the tilin ~unwillin to cooperate in sharing t e ost eot land owner is illing to al ow the use o t _...P_-- ' hrs all the the ditch at his sole cost. If the adjacente lanVeowner is unwilling to allow his an the ditch, the developer ma sed for purposes of tiling part of the adjacent land ne essary to tileCthe waterwade~ that developer shall be required to _ a Y but the - P y _-all of_ the cost of 193 -26- 9-606 9-606 9-606 193 condemnation and pay all of the costs of obtaining the adjacent land and all of the cost of tiling the ditch, lateral or canal. IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A RESPONSIBILITY FOR PLANS It shall be the responsibility and liability of every subdivider, and the owner of the land being subdivided, to construct and install every improvement shown on the plat of the subdivision, represented to be included in the subdivision at any presentation before the Planning and Zoning Commission or the City Council, and all improvements required by the Ordinances of the~City of Meridian, specifically including the requirements of this Subdivision and Development Ordinance, and this responsibility and liability shall be personal to the developer and the owner and shall also run with the land, and this responsibility and liability shall be shown on the plat of the subdivision. The City may withhold building, electrical or plumbing permits, zoning certificates, or certificates of occupancy on the lots or land being subdivided, or the homes constructed thereon, if the improvements required under this Section or the Subdivision and Development Ordinance have not been constructed or installed, or if such improvements are not functioning properly.. The developer and the owner shall also be subject to the penalties of the Subdivision and Development Ordinance also. (Ord. 592, 11-17-92) B IMPROVEMENTS, PUBLIC Every subdivider shall be required to install at his own expense the following public and other improvements in accordance with the conditions and specifications, as follows: 1- Monuments: Monuments shall be set in accordance with section 50-1303, Idaho Code; 2 Streets and Alle s: All streets and alleys shall be constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications adopted by the City Council and Highway District; 3- Curbs and Gutters: Vertical curbs and gutters shall be constructed on collector and arterial streets. Rolled curbs and gutters shall be required on minor streets. All construction shall be in accordance with the standards and specifications adopted by the Ada County Highway District and the City Council; 4- B cycle Pathwavs• Bicycle pathways shall be encouraged within all subdivisions, as part of the public right of way or separate easement, as may be specified in an overall -27- OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY QF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 88713813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor MEMORANDUM: To; Mayor, City Council From; Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer Re; AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 644 COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAk YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning & Zoning December 2, 1994 I have reviewed this Ordinance and offer the following comments, for your information and consideration during the hearing process: 1. The legal description in this Ordinance doesn't close by 2 feet, (1:443). The Rules of the Idaho State Tax Commission requires a closure accuracy of at least (1:5000). 2. The legal description in this Ordinance includes a parcel that was previously annexed with Ordinance No. 602, (6/15/92). 3. Neither description in Ordinances No. 602 or this Ordinance include 1/2 of the Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road. 4. It is my understanding that the original intent of this Amended Ordinance was to rezone the two parcels adjacent to N. Meridian Road. Both of these parcels were thought to already be annexed into the City by Ordinance No. 602, (6/15/92). It is my recommendation that this item be tabled at this time. and that Ordinance No. 602 be amended to include 1/2 of the N. Meridian Road Right-of--Way, and include both of the parcels. New legal descriptions will need to be prepared by a Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, per Resolution No. 158. AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 644 AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 6 AND 7 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is hereinbelow described in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the aforementioned real property which is described as follows: Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 6 and 7 Township 3 North, Range 1 East, and Sections 1 and 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, thence North 00°25'30" West, 2141.22 feet to a point on the section line and on the center line of North Meridian Road, thence North 89°34'30" East, 30.00 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of- Way of said North Meridian Road, thence South 00°25'30" East, 42.15 feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road, said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, thence South 89°43'16" East, 135.02 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 00°53'00" East, 131.03 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 00°53'00" West 174.15 feet more or less, AMENDED ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT Page 1 thence South 88°06'58" West 132.13 feet more or less,. to a 1/2 inch steel pin on said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road, thence North 00°25'30" West, 177.15 feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 00°25'30" West, 135.00 feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned C-C Community Business District; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning; that Applicant shall pay any impact development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City of Meridian as a condition of annexation and if not paid and land shall be de-annexed. Section 2. The Applicant shall pave parking areas adjacent or near property, the design standards for off-street parking in 11-2 414 must be met, specifically including the fencing. Section 3. That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above conditions the property shall be subject to de-annexation, which conditions subsequent shall run with land and also be personal to the owner and Applicant. Section 4. That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax AMENDED ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT Page 2 f ~ Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Amended Ordinance. Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Amended Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this day of 1994. APPROVED: MAYOR -- GRANT P. KINGSFORD ATTEST: WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. -- CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Amended Ordinance entitled "AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH IS GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 6 AND 7 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AMENDED ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT Page 3 ~ .. Y AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE"; passed as Amended Ordinance No.644 , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the day of , 1994 , as the same appears in my office. STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) DATED this day of On this day of , 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. SEAL 1994. City Clerk, City of Meridian Ada County, Idaho Notary Public for Idaho Residing at Meridian, Idaho AMENDED ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT Page 4 ~..,~ O v ~o ~ ~ ~cl Q~ o- ~ M . ,; ~,, , .. ~~ ' ~`` a '~~ y t!1 n ,_ •~ C{ ~~ •; n/~~' Q~ ~/`, ~ °'~ .,~ y . ~- ~.~ ~ .. a ~, ~ ~ %' o v ~ O ~ v ~ r • a' ~ C W d ~ ~ `~'~ +~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~ J o o. a„ `~•. ~ ;i~ ~~~ ~I '~. l..' oZ ~~ ~ q ~ ~ v v~ h v .,~ • .•. 9 0 Z ~ ~ Q?..,.~»,..-»p.~.... ~- .~..~i.•.-~~01 ~ X02 • ~ uu1 ~' ~/~ /YI~~«Lc~ ~ k~ 7 .,~ ~- ~ t ~: ~~ ~~~~ u ~~~ •~ old c~ ~ !'I'IQ~,e~ ~ y 365-~5~00 ~~~~ > .may aN~~ 3~~~ E1~ c~ h 1 1~ _..~._.....~....~°_..." #3 ~~ _- - :~ri ~ i~ ~ ~. a 1~ 3 ,~~ "~ ~'~ s r i ~ ,~ ~; ;; ~ . ~. ti ; `7 ` ~ ~,~~ ~: ~ ~, Pre-Construction Meeting Aspen Hill Apartments September 6, 1995 Page 2 Freckleton: It is still four foot above ground and painted green with finder wire. Maximum number of grade rings allowed is 12 inches. As far as your service line depths on your sewer, the City standard is five feet. In a commercial development, will that work for you or do you want them shallower? Munger: I think shallower (inaudible) 4 foot, five feet outside the building. (Inaudible) Freckleton: We will do our standard pressure test after all utilities are installed prior to paving. This will be a city owned main lines going through the project. Any sewer pipe damaged during the installation of power, gas, telephone, etc. we want MASCO to make repairs on that and not the individual contractors. Typical, after it is paved and you have made sure its Dean, then call for our inspection. Okay, do you plan to start after the 20th on water? Smith: I am not sure, we will probably put 2 crews in there and if so we probably start that water like Monday and do those two live taps probably Tuesday morning of next week. Hezeltine: So water the 11th through the 15th? (Inaudible) the same time as sewer? Smith: Yes, that is possible. Freckleton: Finish up on water about when? Smith: Probably about the 15th. Freckleton: I've got water then the 11th to the 15th. Coordinate with water on those live taps and the same type of deal when the materials are on site give them a call for materials inspection. Finder wire needs to be installed and a continuity test needs to be pertormed on that. Hubble Engineering is going to provide all the staking for curbs etc. The yoke tolerance to the top of the lid is 18 inches to 21 inches. Hudson: Bruce these are 1 1/2" services mostly and those area 30 inch minimum it is different on the bigger meter sets. Smith: That is another question Chip, what do you guys want us to do, bring the 2" pipe over to 1 1/2" meter set. ' Hudson: Bruce and I talked about that earlier and he said it is going to have to be 1 1/2" pipe going to the 1 1 /2" meter after the meter you can go 2" if you want. Pre-Construction Meeting Aspen Hill Apartments September 6, 1995 Page 5 blind flange on it. So that is not that big of a deal. Now as far as, well do you have anything. else on Water Chip? Hudson: There is an irrigation service, I know this has pressurized irrigation, is this going to be fed off of a well or a ditch system? Everman: Ditch Hudson: Okay Freckleton: There actually shouldn't be any services for irrigation that one should be taken off the plans. Munger: The pressure irrigation that you see on the plans is the pump at the bottom of this amenity. That lifts the water back up to the upper pond so that we always have a stream in that is the only irrigation we have. Smith: You are just talking about this is still on here, landscape meter, which is deleted it is still shown on here. Hudson: That is going to be deleted then? Munger: Yes Freckleton: That is the service that comes in off James Court. Hudson: Right Hezeltine: What time frequencies are you looking for the power to come in and water gets out? Everman: The 18th Hezeltine: You are looking at 2 weeks for power probably. Smith: We will have irrigation to do too prior to power coming in, won't we? (Inaudible) Hezeltine: So you want power in from what dates to what dates? Pre-Construction Meeting Aspen Hill Apartments September 6, 1995 Page 6 Freckleton: Let's talk about something else here real quick if we could. On your building construction, I will probably just turn this over to Daunt Whitman our building official. Whitman: I am here because Skip Voss our Fire Marshall couldn't be here. There is going to be some big concern about getting combustible material there without having the hydrants active and access to the buildings. So you will need to coordinate the timing of that so that there doesn't become a problem. As far as doing the foundations and such that we are feeling like it is not as hazardous a time as they start construction with the combustibles. Everman: That is understandable and the way I am going to approach that is there is a fire hydrant right across the road that is within 250 foot of our first buildings plus we can go ahead and put a pit run road in for a temporary basis which would give us base to drive on. That should cover us on those three buildings. Then we will just have to work from there. By the time we get the first building started framing and framed up we will probably have all the underground and it will continuing on the rest of the road. That is a concem of ours. Whitman: You are going to use the roadway for drivers concrete trucks and such so that fire trucks or other emergency vehicles wouldn't have any problem. Everman: Absolutely and fire hydrants across the street like I say we are okay for now. I don't quite now where we will store lumber at I guess we could store it out on the front if the actual lumber piles are a problem we can work that out with Skip. Freckleton: I didn't know if that would affect anybody's schedule so we thought we better bring it up. Power do you want to go in next Don? Hezeltine: Power usually, the way they have been doing it lately they want to get in before we do. So you want power from the 18th through the 29th? Everman: Power going out front or in the back? Smith: We will be in there probably until the 25th. Everman: You only have two.power crossings; power is not a concern of yours, you are behind the building. I am not really concerned when you get in there because you run most of it across the street, and be ready to move without you even going through the site. Hezeltine: I know that our gas main is on this side. Pre-Construction Meeting Aspen Hill Apartments September 6, 1995 Page 7 Everman: You are right over here maybe you can run down this planter and come across the road right in there and cut through there around the back. Hezeltine: Okay, so gas is running in the middle, I haven't seen any plans. With what 4 or 5 meter manifolds. Have we got a mechanical plan to Lynn Davis so he knows what's going on? Everman: Right, who knows what is going on. There are 18 plexes, there are 3, 6, they are all 6 meter manifolds. There are 2 on the 12 plexes, three on the 18 plexes. Hezeltine: Okay, and Lynn Davis had the mechanical for our running line. Everman: I don't know, he has a civil for this Hezeltine: Okay (inaudible) so gas can get in say a time the 18th through the 29th for the main. The low end it would probably take us like 4 or 5 days. So the 18th through the 22nd? Everman: Okay (inaudible) Munger: Why don't you put them back a week because MASCO still has the interior work to do at that same time. Everman: Like one crossing here and one crossing here this will all ready be in. Hezeltine: Because if the 18th doesn't work out then we can pull back a week. Do you want to shoot for the 18th? Everman: Yes, let's shoot for the 18th. Freckleton: You said 4 or 5 days John? Hezeltine: Yes, for the inside. If all the buildings are going to be constructed we will have the main in and the service work at a later date. Get them the main in and whatever services will be required at the same time. Everman: I should have foundations at least on six of the eight buildings by then, hopefully all eight. . Hezeltine: And then Lynn Davis to follow up on the sign ups for the individual Pre-Construction Meeting Aspen Hill Apartments September 6, 1995 Page 8 Freckleton: Okay besides gas from the 18th to the 22nd, what about power. Hezeltine: Power is going to be in front and they are not going to be in the back then we can go in at the same time. Freckleton: Okay, Chip, you had something else you wanted to bring up. Hudson: On these fire hydrants it is been in these plans there is going to be a curb and gutter there evidently. So we would like the fire hydrant to be 3 to 5 feet from the edge of the curb there. Smith: From the back of curb? Hudson: Yes Smith: You want them 3 to 5 Hudson: Three to five feet inside the planter. Freckleton: How wide are those planters? Like that one over there for instance on the east end off of James Court. The planter doesn't look a whole lot wider (inaudible). Munger: That is one of our big ones, but this one here that planter is only 6 feet at the front. This on the very back, middle. Hudson: So if you centered it about middle. Munger: (Inaudible) Then you should have roughly 3 feet around. Everman: Do these valves have to be out in the road for these hydrants? Freckleton: Yes Hudson: I don't know who you are going to get to pour your collars around the valves, but get them to clean the cement off of them when they pour them it makes them a lot easier to get up. Freckleton: Where did Shari go? A.J. did you want to get your 2 cents in? Carlson: I just wanted to check to see what the plan looks like, mine was like October of Pre-Construction Meeting Aspen Hill Apartments September 6, 1995 Page 9 1994. I will get you a trench design as soon as I can, has this changed at all? Freckleton: Possibly, it depends on which set of plans you have. Carlson: (Inaudible) April of 1994 and then Freckleton: There was one sef of plans that had the building on the outside and the perimeter road on the inside (inaudible) so things could have changed. Carlson: (Inaudible)Who wants the design? What will be your first service date? Everman: I will. Probably the first building is going on line December 1st. Carlson: I am sure you have read about us (inaudible). (Inaudible) Freckleton: Is there anything else? Hudson: Bruce, the specs they have here on the back of the 1 1/2" services have changed, we don't use that swing joint which I think MASCO is aware of. They used to have the swing joint with the 90° down and out they will be like the ones you did at the hospital they are a straight shot. That swing joint is left out now. Smith: So just do like we did at St. Luke's? Freckleton: You have a blow off detail shown on these plans. Munger: I think originally there was. Freckleton: Alright is that it? Hudson: I think so. Freckleton: Shari Stiles, our Planning and Zoning Administrator had some issues that she wanted to discuss as well. Stiles: You haven't talked about theditch at all have you? There is an existing ditch along the northern boundary in this property. Are there plans on piping of the ditch. Our ordinance requires that any ditches that are property boundaries or only partially located Pre-Construction Meeting Aspen Hill Apartments September 6, 1995 Page 10 on property be tiled. We need to get plans that show the piping of that ditch (inaudible). Munger: I have one question before you get too far, the ditch that is on our north boundary is the collection ditch from the north run off has nowhere to go. The only reason that ditch is there is to collect his field run off. Stiles: There is irrigation water that runs down there isn't there? Munger: But when he doesn't take his water right straight to that then it comes back out here and drains back into the drain further. Stiles: I think the Scicoes take their water from that ditch. Munger: They might take water out of it too but they are, they didn't show up as one of the people on that ditch so I think they just get what he doesn't take. We looked at piping that at first but it is also his collection ditch. If we pipe it then he has to build another one. At times it does have live inrigation but the rest of the time when he waters his field it is a collection ditch. Stiles: I would like a letter from the ditch rider. Munger: There is no ditch rider (inaudible). Stiles: They said (inaudible) there is a ditch rider on that ditch, I don't know if it is the one clear over on the other side. Munger: That is a user's lateral that probably has a rider and a users group. This ditch that is here only feeds these two pieces it is the one that we are moving a diversion structure for. Freckleton: How this concern came up wasn't it the Barrett's (inaudible) Stiles: Apparently (inaudible) right on the edge of that ditch which will (inaudible) as it should anyway. I understand there is some discussion about moving the ditch or giving the Barrett's some additional land. Everman: No the discussion was we were going to fence on this side of the existing ditch which the ditch that's there on our property as it comes around their shed. If I have to move it their side of the property we will have to move their shed and cut down a bunch of trees, move their driveway over. So we just elected to put the fence on this side of the ditch and Pre-Construction Meeting Aspen Hill Apartments September 6, 1995 Page 11 leave the ditch as is. Stiles: I think we should take care of that somehow, or we will have another Wilson Lane Freckleton: Was that discussed with them is it agreeable to the Barrett's? Everman: The Ban'ett's I don't know, we have been bads and forth and I am not quite sure. She has been talking to everybody I guess the City too the Hawes and the Shorts that own the land right here. I have basically talked to everybody in there the Barrett's, I'm not sure. She don't quite ~derstand what we are trying to do. We are basically trying to leave it as is and put the fence, scoot it over off our property line (inaudible) Stiles: So they will be responsible for tiling it if they ever develop. It can't remain an open ditch (inaudible) Everman: If they are going to develop it, it just dead ends right there doesn't it? Stites: No it goes downstream. Freckleton: The Scicoes. Everman: The Scicoes I don't think are a downstream user. Munger: I don't think they have rights to it but I think they are using it at feast they didn't show up on the list. Everman: The Ban"ett's are the end of the line right? Stiles: I don't know. Munger: Yes, but they would have to, they would end up having to use it for whatever irrigation they do. i guess, ff we relocate that ditch because their shed, because their stuff is on our property we relocate the ditch they are going to have to the it anyway. It is their ditch, if we the it and it screws them up and if we don't the it. I guess that (inaudible) Everman: This whole ditch form here to here is on their property the whole length. The only part that is in discussion is a little jog right here. Stiles: But it is on a property boundary though. Pre-Construction Meeting Aspen Hill Apartments September 6, 1995 Page 12 Munger: It is a couple feet their side. The property line is basically where the old barbed wire fence was which was on the bank of the ditch. It is in there pretty close. Freckleton: I think the way the ordinance is drafted it speaks to adjacent as well. Stiles: Adjacent or even partially located on the property. So we need some approval from Settler's (inaudible) owned and operated by Nampa Meridian Irrigation District. Have they approved plans for any diversions? Munger: Settlers from what t understand talking to them they don't have control of this and (inaudible) from that point on it is a users ditch. We were in contact with the users on the ditch to get that information. Stiles: Then we will need their approvals on that for any construction of that. Everman: We are in the process of getting that. Stiles: Bruce, maybe we need to actually go out there and look at that ditch. Freckleton: Well I think we have to work it out with the Barrett's. Everman: I think it is a real minor problem. It has become a concern of mine because I want to get this fenced off. I want to get going on it right away, I don't know what to do over here because I don't know why she thinks if we put a fence on our side of the ditch if we are screwing her up that way. Freckleton: I think her concem is that if it is fenced off basically that the problem then becomes hers and she doesn't want the problem. Everman: She doesn't want her ditch? Freckleton: She doesn't want the responsibility of tiling it. If it is your responsibility per our ordinance (inaudible). Everman: If she wants the responsibility of moving her shed (inaudible). Freckleton: These are the things that have to be worked out. Everman: I think why don't we get together with her and you out there and would that work. r # ~.~~ /^ ~~~ ~ `~^ GLENN J RHODES, President SHERRY R. HUBER, Vice President JAMES E. ERUCE, Secretary T0: ACHD Commission FROM: Development Services INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE ASPNHILS/DSTECH 6-15-94 DATE: June 9, 1994 SUBJECT: Meridian Site Plan Review- Aspen Hills Apartmen (Applicant - Thomas Development Co., 413 W. Idaho, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83702) (Representative - Hubble Engineering, Inc., 9550 Bethel Ct., Boise, ID 83709) PRELIMINARY REPORT - NOT FINAL UNTIL APPROVED BY THE ACRD COMMISSION FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. Thomas Development is requesting site plan review for a 7.4-acre, multifamily development comprised of 112 apartment units located on the north side of James Court east of Meridi- an Road. James Court was a private road, but the developers and the District are currently in the process of dedicating James Court as a public street with collector status. 2. GENERAL INFORMATION: ACRES - 6.2 SQUARE FEET OF PROJECTED BUILDING - N/A ZONING - Residential - R-40 ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIPS PER DAY - 700 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE - 264 L.F. OF FRONTAGE ON James Court - 920 MOST RECENT TRAFFIC COUNTS - N/A FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP DESIGNATION - Collector ADA COUNTY RIDGE-TO-RIVERS PATHWAY PLAN - No pathway shown EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY - 60-feet in the process of being dedicated REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY - 60-feet; 30-feet from centerline James Court is fully improved with a 41-foot back-to-back street section and 5-foot sidewalk. IMPACT FEE BENEFIT ZONE - West Ada IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - Western Cities ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 ~. Meridian Site Plan Review - ASPEN HILLS APARTMENTS ~ June 9, 1994 Page 2 3. In addition to the unit subdivision ments, an existing from James Court. and will be extend ments to the east. Aspen Hills project, Bridgewood Park, a 72 (18 fourplex lots), and James Court Apart- 50 unit rexidential complex, take access This road is being developed as a collector ed to serve the future residential develop- 4. City of Meridian will take no further action on this project until the dedication of right-of-way for James Court is com- plete. 5. Due to the forecast traffic volumes, James Court should be constructed as a three lane collector roadway. 6. This report is scheduled for sit plan review by the Me,~,i„~.i.an- C ity-~CIItrn~ The following requirements are provided to Meridian City Council as conditions for approval. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Dedicate 30-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of James Court abutting parcel (30 additional feet). The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. 2. The District will not approve final occupancy until the dedica- tion of right-of-way for James Court from Meridian Road to the east property boundary is complete. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right- of-way shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 2. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACRD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 3. Provide written approval from the appropriate irriga- tion/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 4. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drain- age appurtenances, __etc.) outside of the proposed -street im- provements. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. Meridian Site Plan Review - ASPEN HILLS APARTMENTS rune 9, 1994 Page 3 5. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across par- cel. 6. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 7. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACHD. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the requirements of City of Meridian and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of-way or in a drainage easement set aside specif- ically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable amenities placed in said easement. 8. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACHD. 9. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. 10. A right-of-way permit must be obtained from ACHD for all street and utility construction within the public right-of- way. Contact Construction Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file number) for details. 11. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any require- ment or policy outlined herein shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING: DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: Larry Sale i 9LUE ~ ~ In7w~n L~ i In~rws \_ ~~ ~- HERON LANE -- T ' - I/UM170 J.B. PPOST'S / Howls In7NMM1 ~}UMMIf1 svBnivisrox ~hMtS' GT. CP~~v~-ra ~ . ~ ~'sF . ~~r tis ~`~, ~Sp m171a1r e'~!` 't~~~~ f` ~~F In71N+w .~.~ ~.~.. 7~7sN/a IfM7711Y ORI~ \\ ~ ~- ¢ ' sara t m < Z ~ m nrJlun r ~ W Z Z ~ ww ~ ` Z ~ x ~~. ,\ ' ~ ~ \• STRE ~~tt . ET }MN1711 ~ ` nr»71w _ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ f1N7N."' _ _ 1 y.~rL~v ~ •~ ......~ i r- \~ ANMN 7I ~~ i Iwlwln i .I \'. l \ ~ ~, ,'. \\ IIwl11A ~ ~y t 0 ~\ ~. \\ $r~~gevvoo~ P"oC4C \ J ~ ~ ~ CPr°FO5 ~. ~~~ ~\ Il ~~ 'Q7 LYIRd07ldIQ S-/i081 ZC8-SiC (80ZJ ~ 0688 ~lflP! '~8 99aZ auq '0'd T.f"1Q~~1 tom- -T.Zrs' d}7{scau}.ca~ palt7tct7 s22bH uadsY ' , 'I <~4 ,t ' , I ~,~~ ~ ~f, I ~~ i I ~I ~'~' ., ~ '; I li ~,B.,~L 8 i~ it ~ ~ 9" t ~ ~ v' ~ I~ ~ b~ ~ ~~ ~~i is i ~ ~ Ilj ~ ~ • ~ I ~"1 I„ "~ y M~, ,~~ 3~ ~~ ~ ~ ~b ~ =b~ ~-~, ,~~~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !~~1; ~~ !~~i~ i ~~ I ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ II ~ ~ ` ~ ~~ ti~ ~, ~ ~~~ ~ '~, ~ A I LL _I Ia i 3~ '_~ ~y ~. ~r ~~ •I ~ ~~ ~~ s ~t ~t r-~ _~ ~ ~~ "~ a GiBhi [ 3 /t•Ct.t S dtfti ~ 07H i !i?'d S ~ 7'J~W9 WJ ~ ~I _ w ~ _ _ ~~- d _ ~ 'h"i YFS b~ ~ 7 Aisu 4 a~ d I' ;! I ~ I' I I~ 1n l :n W a I~~ II ~'a ~, a 'C~ $ o A C U V] ! +--~t+a w I wl • ~n ero ice MEMORANDUM ~~ Tim Elliott, Bruce Stuart, Daunt Whitman, Skip Voss, Shan S ' tiles cc: File from: Bruce A. Freckleton re: ASPEN HILLS . PRE_CONSTRUCTION MEETING date: September 1, 1995 Apre-construction meeting for the installation of the public utilities at th Hills Apartment project has been scheduled for 9:00 am on Wednesda Se Aspen 6th. 1995 in the City Hall Conference Rooms. Approved construction 1 eptember public utilities are available at the Public Works De pans for the partment. Please plan to attend, your input could be very valuable. Thanks, BF from the desk of Bruce A Frecldeton Assistant to City Engineer City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Are. Meridian, Idaho 83641-It,00 (108) 887.1111 Fax: (108) 881-1197 o~ ~ ,,: ~ ~, ~;; w i ---ti-!i i i i,i ri ~I ~ ___° ~i' ~ _n ~; ui ut iii i r Yli hi i ni - i ~i ~ ~; _ ~i, ~ i Fil - r~ ii ~ ~, ~, .~ . ,~ H! ' ~ i ~ H! ~ ~ tii ~ n~ ~! _, I O m ~ iii s i ui i o + tii C i Hi i ru ~ ; i ni >• i 7i (n ~ i Lit n ~ ~ ui i u; r ~ ~ ' ni ~ , rn i ~;i r u. i ,,i ~ i ~ ~, ~: ~ rn ° ~~ ; ~ 4-~ ~~~ Hi ~ ; ~ ~ 1 ~;; ~ ~ ~,. I I Fti i, I ~~ ~~~ f1: ~ ~' ~-~ - - ~ ~. ' , 4ai i y i I~ ~ . .i, '` ~ 3: i 1 ; .~ ~"l I {{,~ ~ ~ } ~l~ i ~ I . ;~i u ~ i . ~} I ~ f_ , ~ i r: , ~'-'a. CN i 1C1FC>i.U 1Y0. ( ~ ~ ~ ~-~ - - _ I ~- - 'i I i]~a.7~'' ii `~ 1 ~r `'~~ :r ~ .~ ~ ,~ _ , ~.. F~ ,, i, i~ ih' ;~ {1, I i ~1, '_~, t .~ ~~~ ~~~ i N~~ C _~ ~ r Z =C 'r 0 } /~ U r ~....-~ .y .. i _ - - i, _ ii - ..~ i ~ ~_ I ~ ~ i ~ i ..~;rte.rs,mui ~ i ......- - - --:.:::~.-.... _1J T...-:.........- - --...:- - - ---....-. ~ ~ -Y I.....---_ ._ ,, ~ ~ `~ r ~ L. ` - ; V; 4; .>. ~ ~_ - __- ~ 1 I ~ ::~` ~~ i -1 ~~ I ~ ~: .: ~--.: ~ ~ ~ - - i... ~i '~... -- _. ~I ~ . ~ ~ ~- ~ T n ~ ~ y ~ ~~ ~ P ~- ~m ~. . ~ , I ~ ~~. ~ • 4L n ~ ~_ ..._._ j h I ' ~ r r ^~.. ~ ~- -~ J . I \,~ r- ~_- ; ~I L .~ { -- ~ ~` ~ .. + ~ ~ ~~ II ; ~ n ~~~ ' I 1 / <~ \1 1 i 1. j -~ ~ ~: ~ ' ~k~- b L. ~, i . ~ - ~~ I - `~ -- ~ _ i , -_ f i ~. ~ , 1 --L- -_- -- ---...- - ~'~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i I -- I ~~ II M ~ ~ `-_ \\ 1', G .~ ~ _. , ; _.a = ~ , ~` ~ ~ b --- I. ~~~ ~` ~ .-_J II _~. ~; ~~ L'. I . ~', : ,~ ~. _ ~ ~ I ~~ -~ ~-- ~ ~ - ~~`>~ , 1 4 ' i \~~ i> y - l !~` ~.n~ ~i = ii ~I ~ i _ iI___ /~ We, Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe, owners of Meridian Road, hereby request and consent property with a zoning designation of C-C. STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) the property at 2210 N. to the annexation of our Mic el Sciscoe Cy is i oe On this ~~ day of /Uove.,,ds~ 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe, known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. ~.,... ,ei®oeeaereaa,~~~ .•`~`~` ~,. ~~ ~~u .:.> Not y Pub l i c for ah ~.•'~~n~' ~-~. '. ~^;,` Re ding at : ~r~ o%a~. (SEAL) ~ ~`' ~~~' _ , .`' ~ ~ ~_~~ Commission Expir o .;a. ~ ~~ ,y,, M1> ., `~, `'' O .~•• e ~~ o s g,,~ _ ='ti MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING:_ DECEMBER 20.1994 APPLICANT: ITEM NUMBER; 9 REQUEST; AMENDED ORDINANCE #602 - HIMERICH/DORADO AG NCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS OTHER: MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: DECEMBER 20 1994 APPLICANT: ITEM NUMBER; 10 REQUEST; AMENDED ORDINANCE #644 - SCISCOE REZONE AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ~ ~e _ ._ CITY OF MERIDIAN, BUILDING DEPARTMEN 33 E. Idaho, Meridian, ID 83642 T g~ M~ (208) 887-2211 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 1. Legal Description: Lot _ 3 Block -__ Subdivision T •a~ ~~~,AS t ~ s 2. Street Address (city will assign if new construction): 221 0 N. Meri is Rd 3. Owner (if other than contractor): Cynthia Sciscoe 4. Contractor self Phone• 884-Ogn~ Address: Number Street City State Zip 5. I hereby Submit this Building Permit Application to Construct or Install: f~7 New Commercial Building : Sq. Ft. ~ ~ s n Required Plans and Specifications: ~ Site Plan (including lot lines, private & public utilities, drainage, easements & North arrow) 6 Foundation Plan (including ventilation, re-inforcement and frost walls for stoops and overhangs) D Floor Plan (including window & door sizes, ventilation) _ 6 Roof, Wall and Floor Framing Plan ~ - - -' - _ - ~ (~ Elevations (including roof, slope, attic ventilation, chimney heights) I ~ ~ ~ 6 Mechanical Plan (H.V.A.C. ducting systems) ~ ~ Drainage Plan (including calculations) ~ Value: I (~ Electrical Plan ~ I D Plumbing Plan ~ Permit Fee• I Landscape Plan I Fire Sprinkler Plan i Plan Check 6 Other, Specify ~ Total: ~ -__.__~__._J ^ Other, Specify Specify use of building, if warehousing, specify what type of materials are to be stored.Bu?lding to be built al n 1344 sq, ft. to be used as mail order warehouse for catalo sales of educational books and supplies. We plan to advertise nationwide. We would like to allow any local customers a means of saving shipping costs by being open for them fora few hours one day each week. The other 336 sq. ft. to be used for household stora a ur oses. Declaration: I hereby certify that I have completed this application in a true and correct manner. All City of Merid- ian ordinances will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel any state or Ioc~ Iaw r~ulat~g construction. 51g'natu~e~of Owner or Owners Authorized Agent FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY; THE FOLLOWING DEPARTMENTS MUST REVIEW AND APPROVE THIS APPLICATION: ^ BUILDING, ^ PLANNING, ^ ENGINEERING, ^ FIRE 09/21/95 10:02 FACSIH~LE COVER SHEET O~ _~ ~~,5 DATE : I ~ I ~ .~ ,,11G~~~ eU ~~ ~~~~ ~`~ ~ Q ~~ C .~ ~~~ `~~ ~~5~ 1 DELIVER FAX T0: 5 ~ ~ ~^ IL TITLE/DEPARTMENT: N(~~- ~ p(~ ~ ~ ~ p ~,~h ~ ~l~q ~- J ADDRESS: RECEIVING FAX NUMBER: ~~~-- ~-Q (,~ CONFIDENTIAL: YES NO TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES Including Cover Sheet FROM ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY pISTRICT FAX NUMBER (208} 345-1650 NAME: S _U -, ~~ TITLE/DEPARTMENT: ~p_~/~ ~D~Un ~N~ ~e°r"V (c~S COMMENTS: $208 345 7650 ACRD ~J001/004 S!`J~SLdP~ ~I ada county highway districfi 318 Easf 37th • Boise, ldoho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 T h ~ ~- ~ ~~ m ~~ ~y Ceu1`~r (1~H ~ Zvi ~ [ (~`v+~1 ~' .~ ~ r~ rH eh o ~~ ~r~,~~ ~-f D ~ r~~ ~CO~I ~~~~o w ~ 't- '~o rP wl ~f h "{'1 1 v PLEASE CALL US i= YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL FAX TRANSACTIONS SUCCESSFULLI'. (208} 34~-7680, SEP 21 '95 09 51 208 345 7650 PAGE.01 10:02 $208 345 T650 ACRD O~ o JAMES E. BRUCE, President SHERRY R. HuBER, vice President SUSAN S. EASTLAKE, Secretory Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe 2210 N. Meridian Road Meridian, ID 83642 ~ 0 0~~~ September 12, 1995 Via Facsimile mermerjm_occ Re: Meridian Development 2210 N. Meridian Curriculum Cottage Final Occupancy Requirements for projects within the boundaries of a rezone from R-40 to CG Tn order for the Ada County Highway District to approve the final occupancy of the above noted project, the following conditions must be completed. 1. As provided in ACHD Site Specific Requirements on subject development, the District required dedication of 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridian Road for this project. Please provide a legal description of the total property along with the total area and documentation of the value of the land. Provide a legal description for the required additional right-of-way with a calculation of the area, signed and stamped by a registered engineer or land surveyor. Also provide the names, addresses, phone numbers, and Federal Tax ID number (corporation) or social security number of the fee title ownership (current property owner(s)) of the property being conveyed as additional public right- of-way. Upon receipt of required information and a short note. requesting compensation for the additional right-of-way, the District will prepare the necessary conveyance instruments for the signatures and record documents with the Ada County Recorders Office. The District will compensate the property owner(s) for dedicated right-of-way as set forth in the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No, 188 and regulations for right-of-way acquisition. Please send the above-mentioned information to Larry sale, Ada County Highway District, 318 E. 37th Street, Boise, ID 83714 with reference to the name of the project, the file number and address. 2. The District also required that unused curb cuts be removed and replaced with standard vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk. This applies to the smaller (northerly) of the two curb cuts along your parcel frontage because the District Policy Manual (Section 7204,6.14) does not normally allow more ads county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714-6499 • Phone (208) 345-7680 SEP 21 '95 09=52 208 345 7650 PAGE.02 09/21/95 10:03 $208 345 7650 ACRD Meridian Development 2210 N. Meridian Curriculum Cottage I~ 003/004 Page 2 of 2 than one curb cut for parcels with less than 1S0-feet of frontage along an arterial or collector roadway. T conferred with our Tech Review Committee and they recommended that the policy be enforced for this project. Please arrange the parking lot or provide appropriate barriers so that vehicles will not be forced to drive over the sidewalk in order to manuveur around the parking lot. Apparently the City of Meridian did not happen to solicit our comments prior to approving your particular project. You may wish to discuss this situation with them. T am sorry for any inconvenience this may cause you. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 345-7662. Stu rt C. Ric De elopmen Analyst Development Services cc: Project File Chron File Meridian Building Department SEP 21 '95 09 53 208 345 ?650 PAGE.03 09/21/95 10:04 $208 345 7650 ACRD °; ~{ f ~. ,~ ;~ ~ ~ 'J \,. ~Q `C ~., ~J ;` .u .., '~ ~~ \ ~ i~ ~; ~ l ~ i 4, @J 00 ~c :~ tll _~ ---, ., ~G C ~ .~ a `~~ 3 .;;, 3 ~ 1 -~., \ 1 ~ ~ `'~. ~ 1 3 ~ ~ v, ~ ~ ~~¢ ~~. ~~ i ,y. ---_--___.-_- ~-.~ a ~1 SEP 21 '95 09 53 208 345 ?650 PAGE.04 r 7 a. ~~~ T omas ham. _' ,,~~- DEVELOPMENT CO. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION August 4, 1994 Mr. Bruce Freckleton Assistant to City Engineer City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Sewer Service to 2210 N. Meridian Rd. -Mike Scisco Dear Bruce: a 413 W. Idaho, Suite 200 Boise, Idaho 83702 (208) 343-8877 FAX (208) 343-8900 This confirms that the sewer service for the Mike and Cynthia Scisco residence at 2210 N. Meridian Road has been installed by our subcontractor and inspected and approved by the City of Meridian. TCM/cc cc: Mike and Cynthia Scisco Sheri Stiles Bob Angell Larry Stevens s~;~~o.so1 i~~ is .. ~ ~] ~i ~~~ ~ ~ ~ _~ V (~ $ e N _ W o ~ - °og -= 8" . O ~ ~ m ~ : _ _ _ Q O C i ° - m D _ . ~ ~ = j Lj a t' ~ _ :• o 3 : -. ~S` ,~ av~ ~,~ob3w •N - n u ~- ~:- -- ;_- . - { ~- ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.~ x '~ .\ ~~~< I a~ ~'. ~ i T ~ ,f~' .~ .,~~~ ~ ~~ fp ~~ f ~~f 6 R .-. ~ ~~ ;~ rt "~ °~ ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ -\ I s4.~r~ ...~ ~.~ ~; 0 ' e~ r5o.ro ~'~SLo2 0 17?. r5' HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888.4433 • FAX (208) 887813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-221 I GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor July 19, 1994 Mr. Tom Mannschreck Thomas Development Co. 413 W. Idaho St., Suite 200 Boise, Idaho 83702 RE: SEWER SERVICE TO 2210 N. MERIDIAN RD. -MIKE SCISCO Dear Tom; COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOH~JSON Chairman • Planning ii Zoning In response to Mike Scisco's July 18, 1994 letter to you, I visited with Mrs. Scisco and looked over the sewer situation. The septic drain field has failed, and wastes are overflowing into their back yard, and into the house. This situation is a big inconvenience, as well as being unsanitary. Due to the above mentioned situation, and the concerns mentioned by the Scisco's, you are hereby notified that the you must connect to the City sewer system without any further delay. The existing septic system shall be abandoned per the guidelines of the Central District Health Department. Please acquire the necessary permit and pay the assessment due on the prope prior to any construction, and coordinate the installation of the sewer service line with M><ke~c><sco as soon as possible. Please give me a call if you should have any questions. City Engineer cc: Mike Scisco ~~ C: \WPWIN60\DUMPSTER\SCISCO. LTR • P01 1 FAX ~'O: Sheri Stiles City FROM: Michael and Cynthia duly 1~, 194 Mr. Thomas Maao~achreck 'Chamas Dcvalopment Ca, 413 ~VY. Idaho. Ste 2t)t? Boise, lU 837G2 Aear Mr. INanaschreck: s. We hope this day fend tl FAX o July Sib. Iiowever, we are appreCtBtC WEtatever efforts yott are Unfortunately, w+e hate an ima~diate cc Jug 24Lti meeting, we were cectaimly w coustruclion ptocce~ed. We realize the problem in the delay. However, events any Iottger. Our septic drain field is wo haven't minded the st~ht and occassirn past weeks, but it has prop~esseol to wla realty triad to hold out fac your building We've been taking our laundry to a feel jest sot etlective meltminaiing the back tSf most concxan. is the hearth hazard it averrflQwiag, from our backyard access Thal the cheraicai rye and sewer odes m air in our home. It has just progressed for sewer hook-~aap longer. Our ne concerned about 'being, exposed io 1 you begin proceadiag right awry to ho all,Meridian 7/18/94 ieaoc ping well far you. We trust you teceived our tactinp~ you in regards to that letter. VPe do forth cowards that situation. ;ern over the sewer SAuafidn. As requested at the Qg to await sewerhook-up until your building :nefri for you in this and ai the time saw no ~ occurring that cause us to be unable to delay out and rapidly losing its ability to Iunruon. VITe "backup" and odor this has been causing for t~ the back-up occurs on a daily basis. We have lens in order to make il, easier f or your situaotiort. ~ p~ tommimize showers, but it's qtly longer. es occurring. Baihrooan waste is now ape into our yard. Lastly, tnu most detrimental is permeate our house daily as tlu fans circulate the a rapidty and we ace unable !o pui off the r+edd baby ~ due tomorrow and we are very cl~nicat vapors. We are l~iadly requestit~ that up city sewer. We apologise f ar causing any mare burdens to your building plants. Our inUeatiofls reltIly w~er+e to wait upon your caa in tlris situation. and ws fe~e1 badly that wet cannot The heaUh hazards to our • ' n have just beconu too overriding for us to delay any I~ar~+ar, Please contact us as soon possible. With kii-d regards, i Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe - ee 4 ~0 06 cc: Sheri Stites ~ i • ~ PO1 FAX TA: Sheri Stiles City Ha~.l, Meridian FRaM; Cyntha.a 8ciacae ~al~ 5, 1991 Nr. Tho~aa N:nnichrect Thoiai Dereloprteat Co. 4th ~. Idaho, Ste 100 $viae, ID 83ZA2 Dear Nr. Nanaiskrack: 715/94 Aa per oar phone conversation oa Noadap, lnae 17th, since I ltai arable to 1!e present et the Ja>!e 21th ,testing roe bsd oith Nichar;t ie order to discuss areas of cascara re6ardia; tYa 6rildise plaaa, I trorld lite tv fartbar diBCaae the ~attera >re spate a! by plate. Alain, tha><h you for roar coaaiderstioa is egreeiag to relocate the proposed tat lot area and allotriag Nickael sad oe to choore tl'eea tv blrc>< apart^eat •indrttr visas into oar tesideace tad pstg. Aa I rtrtvd in err @hoae coareraatien, ry ClfnCein rich Che tree 9ituatioa la tkt fact that the EiEE ITeei rE roald aced to bola pat 11 for ittoadiate vief blockage roe N regaire a type of tree that twald be leaf-bare [or halt of the year beaiaaittN in fell Back pear, tads befog iaeffectire is onr pntpoaes. to plant evergrteria *oali swat lilcelp recall is it being t fetter of rests before their heigkt troatd provide tier bloetaga. ~e belleYe thEre ire still salters to be reaelved regerdieg toe proposed heilding pl a and iiace .e havoa't heard back iron ras, ! ai sritiag to regreat arch a treetiag or letter is reapvaae. Mr, Naanic6rect, I apologize for casaiag iacontreniencea in poor developosttt plaai. I a~ fnli strata at tie ittpartaace of this iavestrent to yva sad poor partnnra. 9otrerer, I oak that par ploase try sad attderetaad tke elteatioa [too our pesitiaa, Before Nicbael aad ~ area cosaldere psrchssia; tbir property lroo too after tooting at It, tre er}sisal the apaeC^ent baffling Bite plait that traa filed at the line silk the Citp of Neridiaa is order to detersiae ^hetker the tocetion at roar apartreat balidiaaa troald be sedeaireable for orr faeilp living iitaatian. rbe draeittg va file at that Lire Bhorod a very dlffarerrt baildiaN piss than trhal pve Have proposed eaa. Both the tealtor and Nr. Bob Aa6all states that the aparttleot layoat tresld >Eesrlp 6e a dapiicate of roar Ustick sad 5-Nile agart>tenti flat ^ere t:rrreatlp being eonitraeted. 1fe rare eacoer`ed ud edvisel to go look at tbarr tad obaerre their layoat. t!e noticed frith tlloae apartaeatt (ai ba6 oleo io ttlth the drari>tg oa file with the CityJ, that there troald be ao spartttent •ittdota tot~eriag over this :wall barb rarA and hoNe, the larvae aha>ted a fence along oar property, than Bereral teat ei [nndaeapiegf parkl>sg Bpacee, a drireray and t~ t+ra aparttteeEt baildiaea sittin` st aagle6 oit>EVet dirrct ^iado* rialto into this home sad yard at all. t'hia plop ras r~ acceptable to ei end directly affected onr daciaton to parchaBe t)tis property. 1 ea` hoaeitlp tell poo lhal re *unld kern left City ®all that day decidittd rot to bap this lasso tad your curtest site plea been on file. Ne do feel re ,rare eisled is the repreaentatlea of poor dereloproat place i,efvre part:tesiag tkts propert' frot iron. Oats is sot to say this tai intentfonal at alt, hooevar, thin tray hvr it accorred. Plea:e oaderetand, Nr. Nen.nschreck, that re are an at-love close fatsi ly. 1 as a stay-at-bows rottet sad :e do bolts-edacatn urr fire ckildiea. Tbia eesaa the cbitdrea oral tare virtrallp boars 2~ hoard each dap. ibis is Oat hate. I pave absotstely no ptoble~ aitl apart~eet devetoptteat behind onr property. It !: as ideal Location for Buck and Neridiaa certainly can t-Be apatiNent loarlt<;. 4kis is s trice inrent~ent plat oa post part, Pleeee uaderstaad, thoagb, the iacorvt:aieace thi6 retiaed site ptan ka6 t:aaaed am faralip. oar 6acE pars is very srtsll, therefore, oar hoaae ie cioaety sitaated to roar property lice. tiro large bap riadotra en the east side at our koae lost ant to the txo-BtOty batldlaEs yon rich to sitaate sear LYere. One rvoa is ear "ecltool" rooN eel the other is oar diaiab area. t!e spend a great deal of oar tiro in fiefs fro araaa. Itv~, RB • • +re f+ced with htvieg eptrtveat ~indors ao ctaeely aitoated oataide of orr 6oae. ba't yoo pie+:e cvasider orr sit+etiog3 Mss we aek rhj the site plea ch+nae vcc+rred, br t)<v tay~ Iron the osi6i++l dariae' t~e'li be laatiag farRard to +nd ew+itiag yorr teapaoae. kith tied regerda, Cy hia 8ciacbe 1x19 po. Meridita Reed Meridi+n, ID Sf642 ga~~094G cc: Sheei 3tiiea ., s .:• !7 d h m s T o a ~~ DEVELOPMENT CO. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION Mr. Michael P. and Cynthia Scisco 2210 N. Meridian Road Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Mike and Cynthia: June 24, 1994 413 W. Idaho, Suite 200 Boise, Idaho 83702 (208) 343-8877 FAX (208) 343-8900 Thank you for meeting with Bob Angell and me Friday afternoon to discuss our mutual development plans for the Meridian property. The site plan we presented you is the one which we intend to build. As we noted, the tot lot will be moved from the west property line to a location more closely in line with the swimming pool. We will put up a six ft. high solid wood fence between yow property and ours, which fortunately will not cause removal of any of the existing arborvitae. We also agreed to work with you on placing some large (30-35 ft. tall) trees west of the apartment building, which is adjacent to your home to screen the second floor windows from your back yard. The sewer will be connected to yow house when we start ow underground sewer work in the next few weeks and we will work with you on location, installation, etc. to minimize the disruption to you and your family. Please contact Shari Stiles at the City of Meridian Planning Department to indicate your approval of our site plan. We look forward to being your neighbor. TCMJ'cc cc: Robert R. Angell Shari Stiles -City of Meridian scisoo.624 a. ,, ~,., a , ~ • , DECEIVED Thomas DEVELOPMENT CO. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION t~,~Y 3 11994 I~xr May 24, 1994 Ms. Shari L. Stiles City of Meridian Planning & Zoning Administration 33 E. Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 Mr. Bruce Freckleton Public Works Department 33 E. Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Aspen Hills Multi-Family Dwellings Dear Ms. Stiles and Mr. Freckleton: 413 W. Idaho, Suite 200 Boise, Idaho 83702 (208) 343-8877 FAX (208) 343-8900 Thank you for meeting with Tim Merkle of Hubble Engineering and me today regarding the Aspen Bills multi-family dwellings. We will agree to move the tot lot from the location presently showing on the west side of the property and review the site plan with Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe, the people who purchased the home at 2210 N. Meridian Road from us. We understand that if Mr. & Mrs. Sciscoe agree with the site plan, that it is acceptable from a Planning & Zoning standpoint. We will provide plumbing plans and fixture counts and comparative water usage information from a nearly identical apartment complex we constructed at Ustick and Five Mile last year. We anticipate having this information for you in the next few days to assist your review of the water and sewer fee calculation. We agree that we will provide the right-of--way deed to the Ada County Highway District prior to commencing construction. We hope to move rapidly forward on this project and start site work within the next few weeks. • vis. Shar L. Stiles Mr. Bruce Freckleton Page 2 May 25, 1994 Finally, responding to your letter to Mr. Bob Angell on May 16, 1994, we have agreed that so long as we are making good progress with commencing the site work for the Aspen Dills multi- family dwellings, that we can connect the house at 2210 N. Meridian Road to the sewer at that time. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. TCM/cc THOMAS DEVELOPMENT ID~2~3758985 .~"hom ~S DEV~I.UPM~,NT Ctn. REAL ESTATE pLVELt)1'MEIVT ANp CO(VSTRGCTfON Max 18, ~ 99a VIA FAX Ms. Shari L. Stiles Gity of Meridian PleusninS & caning Administration 33 E. Idaho Meridian, ID 8642 Dear Ms. Stiles: MRY 18' 9~ 15 55 No .017 P . 01 413 W. Idaho, Sulu 7.00 ~~~e. ~~ho t3~~ox FAX (2~j 343 8900 Idly partner, Bab Angell, has referred your letter of May 16, l 994 tome. I will be out of the otlioe an busincss the balancx of today (May 18) and May y 9 but back on Friday, May 20, I will ca11 you an that date to discuss ~rther. 5inoerely, alwMld ~ NIr. la*nn~nde rNd NMfl~d w1li~out signt~tura M Ab knee to ++roid dtar, Thomas C. Mannschreck TCM/cc cc: Larry Stevens via fax n~te~.six HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY 0. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney May 16, 1994 A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-221 I GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor Mr. Bob Angel Dorado Development Co. 168 N. Ninth Street, Suite 250 P. O. Box 2666 Boise, ID 83701 Re: Sewer Connection - 2210 N. Meridian Road Dear Mr. Angel: COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAXYERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning It has come to our attention that the existing septic tank and drainfield at the above-referenced address was not abandoned and proper connection to the City of Meridian's sewer system was not completed within the fifteen (15) day period after annexation as required by City Ordinance 7-517. As sewer is within three hundred feet (300') of the property line of the building to be served, please make arrangements to make this connection immediately. Please inform this office at 888-4433 within ten (10) days from the date of this letter as to how you are going to conform with the terms and conditions of your annexation or face de-annexation from the City of Meridian for non-compliance. Sincerely, CITY OF MERIDIAN ~~c ~~ Shari L. Stiles Planning & Zoning Administrator Encl: Ordinance No. 602 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law City Ordinance 7-517 cc: Thomas C. Mannschreck ' ' 7-516 • ~ 7-518 1 and any special users outside of the corporate limits of the City, including all property owned or occupied by the United States of America, Ada County, and the State of Idaho. (Ord. 339,5-29-79) 7-517: REQUIRED USE OF SEWERS: The owner or occupant of any house, building or property used for residential, commercial, industrial, governmental or recreational use, or other purpose, situated within the City which is abutting on or having a permanent right of access to any street, alley or right of way in which there is located a public sewer of said City is hereby required to cease using any other method of disposing of sewage, waste or polluted water, and at his expense to connect such building directly with the public sewer in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter, within fifteen (15) days after date of official notice from the City to do so, provided, however, that said sewer is within three hundred feet (300') of any property line of the building to be served or common property line in a multiple building development. The owner or developer of a new subdivision or development whether subdivided or not shall, at his expense, construct the necessary extensions of the public sewer system to provide public sewer facilities for each lot or building area in his subdivision; additionally, the owner or developer shall have the responsibility, at his expense, of installing the main sewer line to the boundary in his development which is farthest away from the point at which initial connection is made to the present City sewer main. It shall be unlawful for any person to place or deposit in any unsanitary manner on public or private property within the City, or in any area under the jurisdiction of said City, any human or animal excrement, garbage or other objectionable waste. It shall be unlawful to discharge to any natural outlet within the City, or in any area under the jurisdiction of said City, any sewage or other polluted waters, except where suitable treatment has been provided in accordance with subsequent provisions of this Chapter. Except as hereinafter provided, it shall be unlawful to construct or maintain any privy, privy vault, septic tank, cesspool or other facilities intended or used for the disposal of sewage. (Ord. 477, 4-21-87) 7-518: USE OF THE PUBLIC SEWERS: The use of the public sewers of the City shall be in accordance with the following regulations: (A) No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged from any connection any stormwater, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff, subsurface drainage, uncontaminated cooling water or unpolluted industrial process waters to any sanitary sewer. (B) stormwater and all other unpolluted drainage shall be discharged to such sewers as are specifically designated as storm sewers, or to a natural outlet 687 7-518 • • 7-518 B) approved by the City. Industrial cooling water or unpolluted process waters may be discharged, complying with the requirements of Section 308 of the Act and on approval of the City, to a storm sewer or natural outlet. (C) No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged any of the following described waters or wastes to any public sewers: 1. Any gasoline, benzene, naphtha, fuel oil or other flammable or explosive liquid, solid or gas. 2. Any waters or wastes containing toxic or poisonous solids, liquids or gases in sufficient quantity, either singly or by interaction with other wastes, to injure or interfere with any sewage treatment process, constitute a hazard to humans or animals, create a public nuisance or• create any hazard in the receiving waters of the sewage. treatment plant, including but not limited to cyanides in excess of two-tenths (0.2) mg/I as CN in the wastes as discharged to the public sewer. 3. Any waters or wastes having a pH lower than 5.5 or having any other corrosive property capable of causing damage or hazard to structures, equipment and personnel of the sewage works; and, 4. Solid or viscous substances in quantities or of such size capable of causing obstruction to the flow in sewers, or other interference with the proper operation of the sewage works such as, but not limited to, ashes, cinders, sand, mud, straw, shavings, metal, glass, rags, feathers, tar, plastics, wood, unground garbage, whole blood, paunch manure, hair and fleshings, entrails and paper dishes, cups, milk containers, etc. either whole or ground by garbage grinders. (D) No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged the following described substances, materials, waters or wastes if it appears likely in the opinion of the City that such wastes can harm either the sewers, sewage treatment process or equipment, have an adverse effect on the receiving stream or can otherwise endanger life, limb, public property or constitute a nuisance. In . forming its opinion as to the acceptability of these wastes, the City will give consideration to such factors as the quantities of subject wastes in relation to flows and velocities in the sewers, materials of construction of the sewers, nature of the sewage treatment process, capacity of the sewage treatment plant, degree of treatability of wastes in the sewage treatment plant and other pertinent factors. The substances prohibited are: 1. Any liquid or vapor having a temperature higher than one hundred fifty degrees Fahrenheit (150° F (65° C] ). see `~ • • ~ . ORDINANCE NO . ~~ lD AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN ' c~~~,~ p~~OP~~T~ i~1~ICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF SECTION 6 , TOWNS O~T , RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is hereinbelow described: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the above and referenced real property described as: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and is zoned R-40 Residential; that the reason for the R-40 zoning is to allow an apartment complex to be constructed on the parcel which would have a density of 25 dwelling units per acre and no more than 25 dwelling units per acre shall be placed on the property or the .land shall be de-annexed; that the property shall be subject to site planning review; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning; that all ditches, canals and waterways shall be tiled including those that are property boundaries or ORDINANCE Page 1 • only partially located on the property. Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de- annexation if the. owner constructs more than 25 dwelling units per acre; the property shall also be subject to de-annexation if the owner does not construct water and sewer line extensions to serve the property, construct streets to and within the property, or fails to meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and of this Ordinance; if Applicant fails to meet these conditions the property shall be subject to de-annexation, which conditions subsequent shall run with land and also be personal to the owner. Section 3. Tti3t the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this 1~ day of ~"~Q_ , 19 9 2 . ORDINANCE Page 2 ~ + APPROVED: ATTEST : ice;' "' ''.'4 µsg.rys. _ '~ ~~ . ~ ~, CITY CLER -- JACK NIEMANN "'' - ... ~ F: Spa , ,1 ~~~. ~, ~~. i `~ ~ ~,~ s .3. t ~ ,~.~ STATE OF IDAHO,) ~.„~-.~,,,...,~-+"" ss. County of Ada, ) I, ~Ia ~ ~ ~~ City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY GF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE" ; passed as Ordinance No. nQZ , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the 1~ day of SM.Q~ , 1992, as the, same appears in my office. DATED this ~ day of Cl~~ , 1992. ,,, :'i' City ler City of Meri ian ~~- ~ Ada County, Idaho '' •, o, r ~. ORDINANCE Page 3 STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) On this 1(~ day of w,,~~ 1992, .before me, the undersi ne ,.a ~.tary Public in and for said State, personally appeared known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. ,,11111111.,.,. .1 ,- •, ~` F' ~C ': '~. <; ~_ ~ - = gat Elt . .., ~, , r ' ~ T ~ r D 'J ~`k ~ i e SEAL = ° `~ + o ~ ° j!. L ' ~~,4.~ L,v :, ~' ' T~" °~ ~ aw~,,~ov~ ~~~~. ''~~/1/1111111111 Notar Public r Idaho R ing at Meridian, Idaho ORDINANCE Page 4 PARCEL I Corrunencing at the s~ion corner conuiion t.o ~e~ons 6 and 7 , Township 3 North, Range 1 East, and Sections 1 and 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian thence North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 2141.22 feet to a point on the section line and .can ttie center line of North Meridian Road , t_l~ence North 89 degrees 34'30" East, 30.00 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of-Way of said North Meridian Road, said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, thence; North 88 degrees 43'49" East, 328.22 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 83 degrees 49'27" East, 129.18 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 88 degrees 48'37" East, 389.26 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 31 degrees 03'37" East., 414.88 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 88 degrees 34'59" West, 1057.50 feet to a 1/2 inch _ steel pin with a plastic cap on said Easterly Right of Way of North Meridian Road, thence North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 177.15 feet along said Easterly Right of Way of. North Meridian Road to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 89 degrees 26'27" East, 136.06 feet with a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 00 degrees 53'00" West 131.03 feet with a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 89 degrees 43'16" West. 135.02 feet with a 1./2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on said Easterly Right of Way of North Meridian Road, thence North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 42.15 feet along the said Easterly Right of Way of North Meridian Read to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL 1?ROPERTY TO WIT: A part of Lot 3 of J.E. PFOST'S SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof filed in Book 4 of Plats at Page 147, records of Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly describeci as follows: Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 6 and 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, and Section 1 and 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, thence North 0 degrees 25'30" West 2141.22 feet to a point on the section line and. on the centerline of North Meridian Road; thence North 89 degrees 34'30" East 30.00 feet to a 1/L inch diameter steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of-Way line of said North Meridian Road, said point being ttie TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence EXHIBIT "A" North 88 degrees )'~ East. 251.'12 feet t_c nt; thence South 1 degrees 16'11 East 21.00 feet to a po~; thence South 88 degrees 43'49" West 11.8.2() feet to a point; thence South 0 degrees 53'00" East 24.79 feet to a point; thence North 89 degrees 43'16" West 135.02 feet to a point on the said Easterly Right-of-Way line of North Meridian Road; thence North 0 degrees 25'30" West 42.15 feet on said Right-of- Way to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL II Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 6 and 7 Township 3 North, Range 1 East, and Sections 1, and 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, thence North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 2141.22 feet to a point on the section line and on the center line of North Meridian Road, thence North 89 degrees 34'30" East, 30.00 feet'to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the East-_erly Right-of-Way of said North Meridian Road, thence, South 00 degrees 25'30" East, 42.15 feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road feet to 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, thence, South 89 degrees 43'16" East, 1.35.02 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 00 degrees 53'00" East, 131.03 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 89 degrees 26'27" West, 136.06 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on ttie said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road, thence, North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 135.00 feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "A" DEED RESTRICTION FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the below signed Grantor, MARIANN HIMERICH,. owner of the land described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full herein, Bargain and Convey unto the CITY OF MERIDIAN and to all subsequent owners of the above described parcel of property, this declaration, acknowledgement and deed restriction. It is agreed that the property above described was annexed and zoned by the City of Meridian as R-40 Residential, which zone allows forty (40) dwelling units per acre, but during the annexation hearings it was represented to the City of Meridian that there would be a density of no greater than twenty-five (25) dwellings units per acre. It is further agreed that the City of Meridian annexed and zoned this property as R-40 based on the representation that a density of twenty-five (25) dwellings unit per acre would not be exceeded and the Grantor is willing to place a restriction on the property so that density cannot be exceeded and therefore this DEED RESTRICTION is given to the City and it shall bind the Grantor and the property and shall run with the land and the density of twenty-five (25) dwelling units per acre shall not be exceeded. That Grantor specifically covenant that she is the fee simple titled owners of record of the land described in Exhibit "A" and that she has the full and unrestricted right to grant this restriction. Grantor further covenants that she will, at her sole cost and expense, defend this restriction and take all action • • necessary to prevent the density of the land exceeding twenty-five (25) dwelling units per acre That this restriction shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding on the heirs, executors and assigns of the Grantors. DATED This ~,3 day of 195('. Mariann Himerich STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) 3 On this day of ~. , 199, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Puh~ is for in and for said State, personally appeared MARIANN HIMERIC , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that she executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. !~R!!!(t1, o. SEAL - "~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ -.`, , :, f ~\ ~ ~` N y Public r Idaho Residing at: MEQ1OtAr•~' Y~~~~O Corrunenci>>y at th se•i.crn corner ccmunc~n Lo ~t~ns 6 and 7, Township 3 Nortti, Range 1 East, and Sections 1 nd 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian thence North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 2]41.22 feet to a point on the gncti c~r~ 1 i.ne and can the center ] ine cif North Meridian Read . t I~enc~e North 89 degrees 34'30" Eaet, 30.UU feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of-Way of said North Meridian Road, said point being the REAL, POINT' OF BEGINNING, thence; North 88 degrees 43'49" East, 328.22 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 83 degrees 49'27" East, 129.18 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 88 degrees 48'37" East, 389.26 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 31 degrees 03'37" East, 414.88 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 88 degrees 34'59" West, 1057.50 feet to a 1/2 >•nch steel pin witty a plastic cap on said Easterly Right of Way of North Meridian Road, thence North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 177.15 feet along said Easterly Right of Way of North Meridian Road to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 89 degrees 26'27" East, 136.06 feet with a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 00 degrees 53'00" West 131.03 feet with a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 89 degrees 43'16" West 135.02 feet with a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on said Easterly Right of_ Way of North Meridian Road, thence North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 42.15 feet along the said Easterly Right of Way of North Meridian Read to the RF1~L POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING 'r~riEREFROM TJ~E FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL 1?ROPERTY TO WIT: A part of T~c~t 3 of J.E. PFOST'S SLIBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof filed in Book 4 of Plats at Page 147, records of Ada County, Idaho, and more parti.cular].y described as follows: Commencir~c{ at the section corner common to Sections 6 and 7, Townsh.ir_~ 3 North, Range 1 East, and Section 1 and 12, Township :~ Clorth, Range 1 West, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the~ice North 0 de-gees 25'30" West 2141.22 feet to a point on t)~e section line and on the centerline of North Meridian Road; thence North 89 degrees 34'30" East 30.00 feet to a 1/L inch d.i arrieter steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of-Way line of said North Meridian Read, said, point iaeing the 'T'RUE POIN'T' OF BEGINNING; t. I ~~~nce EXHIBIT "A" North 8 A ~ in-t ree9 ' 4 Fast. 1. ~~ 1 . '11. feet l c~ E' nt. ; Ltience South 1 d~~cti ees 1~ 1].~ast 21 . (l(l feet to a r,c~i~; thence South 88 ~l~grees 43' 49" West: ].] 8.2(1 feet. Lo a Point; thence South 0 degrees 53'00" East 24.79 feet to a point; thence North 89 c~pgrees 43'16" West 135.02 feet to a point on the said Easterly Rigtit-of-Way line of North Meridian Rc~:~d; thence North 0 d~~crrees 25'30" West 42.].5 feet on said Right-of- W~ ~,~ to the TRUE I'UIN'I' OF BEGINNING . PARCEL II Commencing at the section corner conunoti to Sections 6 and 7 TownshiY~ 3 North, Range 1 East, and Sections 1, and 12, Township z North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, thence North 00 ciogreea 25'30" West, 2141.22 feet to a point 011 the section line and on the center line of North Meridian Road, thence North 89 ci~grees 34'30" Eaet, 30.00 feet,to a 1/2 inch st ~~el pin with a plastic cap nn the Eaet-erly R i alit - of -Way cif said ~ Nc~r. ~h Meri c9ian Road, 1 I,~,ice, South 00 <l~~grees 25'3U" Easl, 42.1.5 feet along said Ear,t.erl.y Right of ~ Way cif North Meridian Road f~,~~t: to 1/2 inc}~ steel. pi.ti witY~ a plastic cap, s%~id point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, ti~~nce, South 89 c]~_~rees 43' 16" East, 1.35.02 feet to a 1/2 inch st ~~F.~1 pin with a plastic cap, thence South 00 c3~~grees 53'00" East, 131.03 feet to a 1/2 inch st.enl pin with a plastic cap, thence South 89 d~cYrees 26'27" West, 136.06 feet to a 1/2 inch st~»1 pin with a plastic cap on the said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road, thence, North 00 c]~~~.Yrees 25' 30" West, 135.00 feet. along said Ea r ~ i.erly Right - of -Way of North Meridian Road to tl~~~ REAL POINT OF BEGINNING . EXHIBIT "A" ' CP.J~.R NO. 9203742. PARCEL I PW~ EXHIBIT -~~ ~ ~ C~~~~~-„~~t~~ non ~~ ~C Z Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 6 and 7, Townsrip 3 North, Range 1 East, and Sections X and 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian thence North QO degrees 25'30" West, 2141.22 feet to a point on the sect~.on line and on the center line of North Meridian Road, thence North 89 degrees 34'30" East, 30.00 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterl~r Right-of-Way of said North Meridian Road, said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, thence;, North 88 degrees 43'49" East, 328.22 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, .thence North 83 degrees 49'27" East, 129.18 feet to a 2/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 88 degrees 48'37" East, 389.26 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 31 degrees 03'37" East, 414.88 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 88 degrees 34'59" West, 1057.50 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on said Easterly Right of Way of North Meridian Road, thence North 00 degrees 25'3011 West, 177.15 feet along said Easterly Right of Way of North Meridian Road to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence ~v7orth 89 degrees 26'27" East, 136.0& feet with a 1/2 inch steel. pin with a plastic cap, thence North 00 degrees 53'00" West 131.03 £eet with a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 89 degrees 43'1611 west 135.02 feet with a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on said Easterly Right of Way of North Meridian Road, thence North 00 degrees 25'3011 West, 42.15 feet along the said Easterly Right of Way of North Meridian Road to the . REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. E~~CEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY TO WIT: A part of Lot 3 of J.E. PFOST'S SUBDIVIS20N, according to the Plat thereof filed in Book 4 of Plats at Page 147, records of .A.da County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 6 and 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, and Section 1 and 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, thence North 0 degrees 25'30" West 214]..22 feet to a paint on the section line and on the centerline of North Continuatioxz of Exhibit A Order No. ST-92037425 PW/PC Meridian Road; thence North 89 degrees 34'30" East 30.00 feet to a 2/2 inch diameter steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of-Way line of said North Meridian Road, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 88 degrees 43'49" East 252.72 feet to a point; thence South 2 degrees 16'21" East 21.00 feet to a point; thence South 88 degrees 43'49" West 17.8.20 feet to a point; thence South 0 degrees 53'00" East 24.79 feet to a point; thence North 99 degrees 43'1611 west 135.02 feet to a point on the sand Easterly Right-of-Way line of North Meridian Road; thence North 0 degrees 25'30" West 42.15 feet on said Right-of- Way to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL II Commencing at the section earner common to Sections 6 and 7 Township 3 North, Range 2 East, and Sections I and 12, Township 3 North, Range 2 West, Boise Meridian, thence North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 2241.22 feet to a point on the section line. and on the center line of North Meridian Road, thence North 89 degrees 34'30" East, 30.00 feet to a 7./2 izzch steel pin with a plastic cap an the Easterly Right-of-Way of said North Meridian Road, thence, South 00 degrees 25'30" East, 42.15 feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road, said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, thence, South 89 degrees 43'16" East, 135.02 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 00 degrees 53'00" East, 131.03 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 89 degrees 26'27" West, 136.06 feet to a 7_/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road, ther_ce, North 00 degrees 2S'30" west, 135.00 feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. ~ ~`r~ BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MARIANN HIMERICK AND DORADO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. ANNEXATION AND ZONING THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 6 AND 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, AND A PARCEL OF LAND COMMENCING AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, AND EXCEPTING A PART OF LOT 3 OF J.E. PFOST'S SUBDIVISION, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for consideration on April 13, 1993, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Planning and Zoning Commission having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant appearing in person and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for April 13, 1993, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the April 13, 1993, hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - PAGE 1 • 2. That the property included in the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this reference is incorporated herein; that the property is approximately 7.40 acres in size; it is located East of North Meridian Road. 3. That the property is presently zoned by Ada County RT (Rural Transition); that the Applicant requested that the property be zoned R-40 Residential with a development density of 25 residential units per acre. 4. The general area surrounding the property is used agriculturally and residentially. 5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits. 6. The Applicant is not the owner of record of the property but the owner of record has consented to the annexation and consented to the Application. 7. .That the property included in the annexation and zoning application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 8. That the entire parcel of ground requested to be annexed is presently included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. As found above the Application requested that the parcel be annexed and zoned R-40 Residential but the Applicant testified that development would not exceed 25 dwelling units per acre; Applicant further testified that the swimming pool and other FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - PAGE 2 • improvements would be included in the first phase of the development. 10. There was a property owner in the immediate area that testified on the Application as to his desire of requiring a collector street, but he had no objection to the Application. 11. That Larry Sale of the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) testified stating ACRD was requiring a traffic study and a collector street and wanted those as requirements of the annexation. 12. That the property is in the NORTH CURVE Neighborhood as set forth in Policy Diagram in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan; that under Housing Development on page 25 and 26 of the Comprehensive Plan, property inside the Urban Service Planning Area may be developed at greater densities than one dwelling unit per acre and it is the policy that a density of greater than 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres may not be exceeded outside of the Urban Service Planning Area. 13. That in the Rural-Area section of the Comprehensive Plan it does state that land in agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity until it is no longer economical to exclude orderly growth and development to maintain agricultural pursuits. 14. That Meridian has, and is, experiencing a population increase; that there are pressures on land previously used for agricultural uses to be developed into residential uses. 15. That the property can be physically serviced with City FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - PAGE 3 • • water and sewer. 16. Ada County Highway District, the Central District Health Department, Nampa Meridian Irrigation District, Settlers Irrigation District, City Engineer, Meridian Police Department, Meridian School District, and City Fire Department submitted comments and such are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 17. That the R-40, Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 6 as follows: (R-40) HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT: The purpose of the (R-40) District is to permit the establishment of high density residential uses at a density not exceeding forty (4.0) dwelling units per acre. Connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer Systems of the City of Meridian is required. 18. That the City has no zone which allows development at a density of 25 units per acre; the ordinances of the City also require that land be zoned upon annexation. 19. That proper notice was given as required by law and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission were given and followed. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met; including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - PAGE 4 ~ i 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that exercise of the City's annexation authority is a Legislative function. 3. That the Planning and Zoning Commission has judged this annexation and zoning application under the provisions contained in Section 50-222, Title 67, Chapter 6.5, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice. 4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met. 5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing ,within the City and State. 6. That the land within the proposed annexation is contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian, and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation. 7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the Applicant and the annexation is not upon the initiation of the City of Meridian. 8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - PAGE 5 • • 9. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that the Applicant shall be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer; that the property will be subject to Site Planning Review and the Subdivision and Development Ordinance. 10. That since ~he Applicant's property is in the NORTH CURVE NEIGHBORHOOD of the Comprehensive Plan, the annexation would be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and the requested Zoning would be since the land is within the Urban Service Planning Area. 11. Therefore, based on the Application, these Findings of Fact and Conclusions, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, it is ultimately concluded that Applicant's property could be annexed and zoned, as requested. 12. That the property shall be zoned R-40 but shall be subject to de-annexation if a density of greater than 25 units per acre is exceeded; this limitation is a condition of. annexation and development. 13. That all ditches, canals, and waterways shall be tiled as a condition of annexation and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de-annexation.. 14. That the requirements of the irrigation districts and Ada County Highway District shall be met as well the requirements of the City Engineer. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - PAGE 6 ~ • • APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE COMMISSIONER SHEARER COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) ' VOTED_-~~ VOTED__ ~~~ VOTED VOTED VOTED DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and compliance with the Ordinance of the City of Meridian. MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - PAGE 7 •HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNgI MBdBERS OFFICIALS A GOOd Plate LO L1VC RONAIDRTOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer 1iF-ii 1111~~i^J CITY OT1 * /~ RIDIAN btA7(Y6iRINGTON RpgERrD.CORRIE WALT W. MORROW GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, water works supt. 33 EAST IDAHO WAYNES. FORREY, AICP planner a,Zoni~q Administrator JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 _ JIMJOHNSOt't W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (~) 887813 Chairman-Plannirq 6 Zoning WAYNE G. GROOKSTON, JR:, Attorney Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor FACSIMILE COVER SHEET DATE: ~ ~~ DELIVER FAX TO: ~~ ~/e~ TITLE/DEPARTMENT: RECEIVING FAX NUMBER: ~ " ~ ~ /~~ CONFIDENTIAL: YES NO TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: FROM CITY OF MERIDIAN - FAX NUMBER (208) 887-4813 NAME: ~/~ r~~ ~~~~5 TITLEIDEPARTMENT: ` PHONE NUMBER: ~~ ~~~ TS: PC.S~ ~~(/P ~~~ ~L COMMEN ~~ ~ , ~ /GC f sJ'>'~s: TIME: % r r~~ S /t C; iG1/I _ ~~l PLEASE CALL IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL FAX TRANSACTIONS SUCCESSFULLY. • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: April 19. 1994 APPLICANT: MIKE AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 16 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING: VARIANCE REQUEST A ENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: ~~~wrp~,t+~ ~` 1 ~-~~'~,~d~/j Q CITY POLICE DEPT: "REVIEWED" CITY FIRE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED C OMMENTS CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: I OTHER: ` ~UB OF TREASURE VALLEY • OFFICIALS COUNCIL MEMBERS A GOOfj PIaCe t0 L1V2 WILLIAM G.BERG,JR.,CityClerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer ~~ CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA MAXYERRINGTON ROBERT D CORRIE GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer // . WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief " MERIDIAN, IDAHO $3642 Planner 8 zoning Administrator GORDON, Police Chief W.L. "BILL JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887813 Chairman ~ Planning 6 Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 88'7-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE C1TY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, may we have your answer by: April 12 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/30/94 HEARING DATE: 4/19/94 REQUEST: Variance Request BY: Mike and Cynthia Sciscoe LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: 2210 N Meridian Road, portion of Lots 3 8~ 4 of J.E. Pfost's Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER -CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: • CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E. IDAHO AVE.. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 VARIANCE APPLICATION (RE: Meridian Zoning Ordinance) NAME : l ~ ~ 1,[ E' f. ~~J f/i j~' J~! SLD ~ (owner or hdlder of -valid option) FHONE ADDRESS : ~a~r~ ti. //!{//'/[li(~i~ ~OG4 GENERAL LOCATION : Portan O~(1~/S 3 f '7 Gt c~~ ~-~~ ~(~/V/~/O~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: S~PP ~ ~C/tP{?~ PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR VALID OPTION: A copy of your property deed or option agreement must be att~alched. f PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION t,; ~~~ ~~~u VICINITY SKETCH: A vicinity map at a scale approved by the City showing property lines, streets existing.and proposed zoning and such other items as the City may require. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS: A list of all property owners and addresses within contiguoug to, directly across the street from, and within a 300 radius of the parcel{s) proposed for a Variance must be attached. (This information is available from the County Assessor) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE: U/,?/"C~/~e fa ~I jDi~ /-PSl~~i~L~ SIGNATURE : G~ CITY COUNCIL RECORDS Date Received City Council Hearing Date Received By • • EXHIBIT "A" AITACIiED HERETO AND I~fADE A PART HEREOF TIfAT CERTAIN DEED OF TRUST DATED DECffi48ER 7, .1993. PLEASE INITIAL ~- A PORTION OF LOTS 31A S ATOPAGE p470, RECORDS OF ADAM COUNTYINDAHOTDE CRIBED AS OF, FILED IN BOOK 4 OF P FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTION 6 AND 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, ANO SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREE 25' 3F NORTH MERID AN~ OAD41 22 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SECTION LINE AND ON THE CENTERLINE 0 THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 34' 30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH STEEL PIN WITH A PLASTIC CAP ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID NORTH MERIDIAN ROAD, THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREE 25' 30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 42.15 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF NORTH MEDEGREES 43'~16AEAST A D STANCE OF 35 02O EGTOTO A /2 NNCH STEEL PIN WITH THENCE SOUTH 89 A PLASTIC CAP, THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREE 53' 04" EAST A DISTANCE OF 131.03 FEET TO A 1 /21NCH STEEL PIN WiT A PLASTIC CAP, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 26' 27" WEST A DISTANCE OF 136.06 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH STEEL PlN WITH A PLASTIC CAP ON THE SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF NORTH MERIDIAN ROAD, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREE 25' 30R" MENT NOS~2~9 IN BOOK F OF SURVOEYS AT PAGE 624 AS 133.00 SURVEY RECORDED UNDER MST U FEET) ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF NORTH MERf01AN ROAD TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. ~' ~., i MFRiD~~4 II ~\„ R~~.~E i ~~ .-~_ ,~,.~~. .„~~, ~ ~~~ J.B. PFOST~S~•. '"'~'" I •~ rn~r~wn ~ •\ I ~ ~n~~.» j ~ •'. _ ,~,~,,, SIIBDIDISION I \\ • w .~ h Mts~ C~. (Prit/~¢~ ~ • °s ~\ ~~~ -ys J ~ri~geW00d -\ ~~ \ - ~~ ~~.~°-y CPr~ poseo~~ ~\ ~~~;~ ~, ~P \~. m,..r. t - • DRIB nrume ~w ~'~ m t Z m non r ~ W_ eManw t~pr 2 2 •~ ~ ••\ \\ I •~ nwr~n ` ` r-fsit ~ ST Rff T ~'~~~ aw~yw~ ~~ S ~ ~ '~~ ~~ • • ~ ~ ~ L 11~tlMW C Q ~ A 0 A 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l~ 1 ~-~ ! ~----~ W I ~~ ~. • • i HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G.BERG,JR.,CityCterk MAX YERRINGTON JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer CITY OF MERIDIA ROBERT D. CORRIE N GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT. Waste Water Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO- SHARI STILES KENNY W. BOWERS. Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 - ~EC~~~~~°nmg Administrator W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief M JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888433 • Ffvc (208, 887-as13 APR Chairman • Planning 6 Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 ~ ~ 1994 GRAN'rP.KINGSFORD ~'~'~'`-~% Vif" i~~l~s~~ll~'1f7 , Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, may we have your answer by: April 12 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/30/94 HEARING DATE: 4/19/94 REQUEST: Variance ReQUest BY: Mike and Cvnthia Sciscoe LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: 2210 N Meridian Road, portion of Lots 3 8~ 4 of J.E. Pfost's Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT] BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES ~ / ~ ~ A , OTHER: `~ 7 7 YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: .//~~ ~ ~~~c~. e • SG SCo ~P ~,~ ~~ ORDINANCE NO.~_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL .PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT TAE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 6 AND 7 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN,. ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to amend and change the zoning from R-40, High Density Residential to C-C, Community Business, for the described parcel in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the aforementioned real property which is described as follows: Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 6 and 7 Township 3 North, Range 1 East, and Sections 1 and 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, thence North 00°25'30" West, 2141.22 feet to a point on the section line and on the center line of North Meridian Road, thence North 89°34'30" East, 30.00 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of- Way of said North Meridian Road, thence South 00°25'30" East, 42.15 feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road, said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, thence South 89°43'16" East, 135.02 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 00°53'00" East, 131.03 feet to a 1/2 inch stee} pin with a plastic cap, REZONE ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT Page 1 I ~_ ' • • thence South 00°53'00" West .174.15 feet more or less, thence South 88°06.'58" West 132.13 feet more or less, to a 1/2 inch steel pin on said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road, thence North. 00°25'30" West, 177.15 ,feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 00°25'30" West, 135.00 feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. be, and the same is rezoned from R-40 Residential to CC Community Business District, and Section 11-2-425, Official Zoning Maps is hereby amended to reflect the same. This rezoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for rezone. Section 2. The Applicant shall pave parking areas adjacent or near property, the design standards for off-street parking in 11-2 414 must be met, specifically including the fencing. Section 3. That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above conditions the property shall be subject to rezone back to R-40. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after it_s passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this day of , 1994. APPROVED: MAYOR -- GRANT P. RINGSFORD ATTEST: WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. -- CITY CLERK REZONE ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT Page 2 f, i • • STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN TAE CITY OF .MERIDIAN WHICH IS GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 6 AND 7 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE"; passed as Ordinance No. , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the day of , 1994, as the same appears in my office. DATED this day of STATE OF IDAHO,) • ss. County of Ada, ) 1994. City Clerk, City 'of Meridian Ada County, Idaho On this day of , 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS my official seal written. SEAL WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the day and year in this certificate first above Notary Public for Idaho Residing at Meridian, Idaho REZONE ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT Page 3 • OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Waler Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chiel WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 •~ Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor APR 1 8 1994 SHARISTILES Planner 6 Zoning Administrator / tr . .-. Cl~~ `,!1 I~t~I~,~OHNSON ~~~~a~ n~ f~irman • Planning d Zoning 0 ~ APR 1994 NAM?A & MERIDIPPA,,N TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVF~~~~~KOJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, may wr' have your answer by: April 12 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/30/94 HEARING DATE: 4/19/94 REQUEST: Variance Request BY: Mike and Cynthia Sciscoe LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: 2210 N Meridian Road, portion of Lots 3 ~ 4 of J.E. Pfost's Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORR~IE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SE=WER OEPARTUIENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT , ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH • NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the variance request for Mike and Cynthia Sciscoe. A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS RECEIVIEBERTD OROE CITY OF MERIDIAN WALT W. MORROW CENTRAL •• DISTRICT pRHEALTH ~ECE~~~~ .~ Retuf~n to: DErARTMENT ^ BOISe REVIEW SHEET APR 1 8 1994 ^ Eag~ C{TY 'fit"~. ~~:~;~~K~d ^ Garden City. ~, Meridian Rezone # ^ Kuna Conditional Use # ^ ACZ Preliminary/Final/Short Plat V~~~ ~ Go T .3 t- ~ E OASTS •Sy JI S lo~ ^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal. ^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal ^ 3. Spec'rfic knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions onthis-proposal before we can commern. ^ 5. Before we can commern concerning individual sewge disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: 2 feet ^ 4 feet ^ 7. After written approval from appropriate ernities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ^ Cernral sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Communty water well ^ Irnerim sewage ^ Cernral water ^ Individual sewage ^ Individual water ^ 8. n The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmernal Quality: • ^ Central sewage ^ Communfty sewage system ^ Community water ^ Sewage dry lines ^ Central water ^ 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probelm. ^ 10. This department would recommend deferral urnil high seasonal ground water can be determined 'rf other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be s4bmitted for a plan reiew for any: ^ Food establishment ^ Swimming pools or spas ^ Child Care Center ^ Beverage establishmern ^ Grocery store 13: .,AEG-S ~ y ~~7`~GL-~ /lI U,S~ ~~ CrONN~-~-7~ DATE: %d ~j/ ~'9 p~,~,/~-~ S~L=W~f~ ,~/~~pofq.L Reviewed by: ~ ~ `S~S ~~ ©/L «N/,~~~~~L''' ~~ CDHD 10-91 rcb / /~y~-//~L~- 04-05-1994 01~24PM FROM CPML TO 887481332 P.01 ~ ~ D~JRADO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY X208) 3446511 P.O. Box 2666 Fax {208) 345-6321 ~ Boise, Idaho 83701 Aprijl 5, 1994 Ms. !Shari Stiles C~:ty~ of Meridian 33 E:. Idaho St. Meridian, 1D 83642 Post it" Fax Note 767.1 r~ ' !~ p~- To Fi c PM Rhone ~~ ~' Fax # ~ ~, ~~ Fex M Fax: ~87w4813 ' RE: ~tezone Request Dear Shari, Lard D. Stevens Snt~ I, as individuals, are the currEnt owners of 'the x.55 acre piece q£ property located on the northeast corner of Nart~ Meridian Road~and James Court, aka "Parcel III". We receiztly purchased this land from the entity of Dorado Development Company,; of which Mr. Stevens and I are sole owners. At oine paint in time, Dorado Development Company owned th® .42 acre's with residence;, now owned by Mr. Michael Sciscoe, aka "P$z'cf:l II", the .55~ acres, now owned by us, and the 6.45 acre parcel located to tree east of the Sciscoe's property, aka "Parcel I", wh~.ch is still ob~med by Dorado Development Company, It is our intention to request from th® City of Meridian a rezone on the .55 acres from R-40 to CC, allowing us to construct an office building on the property. A$ such, we fornEaliy ask that this letter serve as our official request to th® City for this zoning change. . I ampenclosing a legal description of Parcel ITI, the .S5 acres in question, Flea'se contact ace a~ your earliest convenience should you have any ~£urther questiarss . thank you for your assistance. Sincerely yours, R t An ell Preside RRR Dinh SHAR3.REZ Encxosure TOTAL P.01 04-05-1994 01~43PM FROM CPML TO 887481332 P.01 • amium Amount: $ 45.04 SCIiEDULE - A Ordefr No.: ST-9203'7425 PW Policy No,: 0-9993-67306 Date of Policy: JiTNE 2~5, 1993 at 4:53 p.m. Amount~o~ Insurance: $' 10,0OO.Oq 1. NameE of Insured: Ra.BERT R. ANGELL AND LARRY D. STEVENS 2. The estate or interest is the land described herein amd which is covered by this Policy is: ~'F~E SIMPLE 3. 2heiestate car interQSt referred to herein is at the date of policy vested in: . Rt7BERT R. 21NGELL, a married man, and LARRY D. STEVENS, a married main ' 4 . The ].and xeferred to iz~ this Policy is situate ia: State of IDAHO, Couuty of ADA: PARCEL III Ci~MMENCING a.t the :section corner comdnon to Sections 6 and 7, Township 3 North, Range ~. East, and Sections 1 and 12, Township 3 Ntrxth, Range 1 West , Boise Merididz~. thence North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 2141,22 feet to a:point on the section line and on the center Line of 1Vorth Meridian Road, thersce North 89 degrees 34'30" East, 30.04 feet to a 1J2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of-Way of said North Meridian Road, thence North 88 degrees 43'49" East, 328,22 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin~with a plastic cap, thence North 83 degrees 49`27" East, 129,18 feet to a ]./2 inch steel pin .with a plastic cap, thence North $$ degrees 48'3"]" East, 389.26 feet to a ~.J2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 3~. degrees 03'37" East, 414.88 feet to a 1/Z inch stee3 pirz w~,th 3 plastic cap, thence South 88 degrees 34'59" West, lOS7:50 feet r,o a:1/2 inch 04-t05-1994 01~44PM FROM CPML ~. ~~ • TO 887481332 P.82 • Surd. ~-O i '~ I I TOTAL P.02 ~ ~.~ i. ~~ • March 4, 1994 To Who~u it May Concern: We are in agreement with changing our rezone request from C-G tP L'-C ,.,,,~.~ / ~~UjCesL L_..'` MYCh 1 and Cynthia Sciscoe Poi t ~ • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: April 5. 1994 APPLICANT: Dorado Develoument and AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 1 Mike and Cynthia Sciscoe REQUEST: Rezone Request A ENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT; ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: LETTER FROM MIKE AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE • • March 29, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: It is agreeable with us to change our zoning request from a C-G to a C-N. ,~ Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe • DORADO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (208) 344-651 1 P.O. Box 2666 Fax X208) 345-6321 Boise, Idaho 83701 April 5, 1994 Ms. Shari Stiles City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho St. Meridian, ID 83642 Fax: 887-4813 RE: Rezone Request Dear Shart, Larry D. Stevens and I, as individuals, are the current owners of the .55 acre piece of property located on the northeast corner of North Meridian Road and James Court, aka "Parcel III". We recently purchased this land from the entity of Dorado Development Company, of which Mr. Stevens and I are sole owners. At one point in time, Dorado Development Company owned the .42 acres with residence, now owned by Mr. Michael Sciscoe, aka "Parcel II", the .55 acres, now owned by us, and the 6.45 acre parcel located to the east of the Sciscoe's property, aka "Parcel I", which is still owned by Dorado Development Company. It is our intention to request from tho City of Meridian a rezone on the .55 acres from R-40 to CC, allowing us to construct an office building on the property. As such, we formally ask that this letter serve as our official request to the City for this zoning change. I am enclosing a legal description of Parcel III, the .55 acres in question. Please contact m? at youx earliest convenience should you have any further questions. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely yours, R t An ell Preside RRA/mh SHARI.REZ Enclosure I • CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E. IDAHO AVE. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 VARIANCE APPLICATION /~ (RE: Meridian Zoning Ordinance) NAME : /'~ I~,~P f (,( `t~T JCI j(~l ~ F~HONE (Owner or h lder ofJJ valid op/tion) ADDRESS : ~~~a N. //~{J!'/CliGi~1 ~OGd- GENERAL LOCATION: Parf~n O~(,//ls 3 f I 4~~G. ~S~S ~UI UI~/D~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: SPP G- C{Gf1~ PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR VALID OPTION: A copy of your property deed or option agreement must be attached. PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION (.:I VICINITY SKETCH: A vicinity map showing property lines, streets such other items as the City may r~c,~ esf~d at a scale approved by the City existing and proposed zoning and require. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS: A list of all property owners and addresses within contiguoug to, directly across the street from, and within a 300' radius of the parcel(s). proposed for a Variance must be attached. (This information is available from the County Assessor) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE: U~i/r'G'/~L' ff) ~~Ir)r~/ ~~~iry[_~~~~ S I GNRTURE : ~.i CITY COUNCIL RECORDS Date Received City Council Hearing Date Received By i IBIT "A" ATTACIiID 'HERETO AND HARE A p~T xE>~oF Tt1AT CERTAIN DEED OF TRUST DATED EXS DECffi~iBER 7, 1993. PLEASE INITIAL ~- TiON OF LOTS 3 AND 4 OF J.E. PFOST'S SUBDIVISi DA C UNTY!NDAHOTDE C BED AS OF A POR FILED IN BOOK 4 OF PLATS AT PAGE 147, RECORDS OF FOLLOWS: GAT THE SECTION CORNERCOMMON TO SECTION WESD, SOTISE ASERI~IANORTH, RANGE COMMENCiN 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANG TH 00 DEGREE 25' 30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 2141.22 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SECTION THENCE NOR LINE AND ON THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH MERIDIAN, ROAD, TH 89 DEGREES 34' 30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30. RTH MER D AN RO^DH STEEL PiN WITH THENCE NOR A pI,ASTIC CAP ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID N H 00 DEGREE 25' 30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 42.15 PO~~ oFN~£GANNINGTERLY RIGHT OF THENCE SOUT WAY OF NORTH MERIDIAN ROAD, SAID POINT BEING THE REA TH a9 DEGREES 43' 16" EAST A DISTANCE OF 135.02 FEET TO A 1 /21NCH STEEL PIN WITH THENCE SOU TH p0 DEGREE 53' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 131.03 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH STEEL PIN WIT A PLASTIC CAP, THENCE SOU A PLASTIC CAP, SOUTH 89 DEGREES 26' 27" WEST A DISTANCE O AY OF NOR H MERIDIAN ROADEEL Pi THENCE WITH A PLASTIC CAP ON THE SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF K F OF SURVEYS AT PAGE 624, AS 133.00 RTH 00 DEGREE 25' 30" WEST A DISTANCE ON 8305 0 FEET (SHOWN ON RECORD OF THENCE NO SURVEY RECORDED UNDER INSTRUMENT N0.8426809 I AID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF NORTH MERIDIAN ROAD TO 7HE REAL POINT OF FEET) ALONG S BEGINNING. • ~- ; ne~L~'R~ D ~N ~, : R ~ z ~[ E -i BLUE HERON LANE __ _ , l/pM1111 \ I ~ A/NNMM IIQMNIN 1/gY1Ml1 RN 1 \ \ ` I J.B. PFOST/S~-• '""""' / nur11/s •-.. rnIw11111 I ~ . I ~ m111wa1 I ~ '. SIIHDIVISION I ~~~~ \. JhMts' CT. CPriN~~ Y ° ,1f • s .~ ~~~ ~ p~ I- \~~ s~ Sic , l o p~1.. tis ~r~c~ eWoo~ CK \ 9 ~~ m11ww1 e4~- CPrc fo5 ~ ~ S'~~1~ ~•~ mlwiw ~ - - qH• ew11114 ' SRI` nwww . ItIN3MN1 \ t t m K ~ Z m f1111~/ r ~ W_ 1111011M IIIIIIYIN Z Z ' •\ •\ I ~ 11Wi1711 `~ rf~E ~ $TRffT -:~. ~_ nwnlw nwww a -~, ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ a ~ --'-- - - _ _- mniur• ~ Q` m • • PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET Ted and Wanda Hepper 43 East Fairview Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 James Court Associates 760 W. Myrtle St. Boise, ID 83702 Bedelco, Inc. 5204 Sorrento Circle Boise, ID 83704 Bews & Smith 5204 Sorrento Circle Boise, ID 83704 Jack E. and Doris F. Barrett 2250 N. Meridian Road Meridian, ID 83642 James Banducci, Jr. 2116 N. Cole Road Boise, ID 83704 • March 29, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: It is agreeable with us to change our zoning request from a C-G to a C-N. Micha 1 and Cynthia Sciscoe • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MARCH 1, 1994 APPLICANT: DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 10 MICHAEL AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE REQUEST; REZONE REQEUST A ENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY EINGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CITY POLICE DEPT: "REVIEWED" CITY FIRE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ' • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA MAXYERRINGTON ROBERT D CORRIE GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer . WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. 33 EAST IDAHO WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief " " MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 Planner & Zoning Administrator W.L. BILL GORDON, Police Chief JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. GROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887813 Chairman • Planning & Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. K[NGSFORD Mayor MEMORANDUM To: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor and City Council From: Wayne S. Forrey, Planning Director Date: January 6, 1994 RE: REZONE REQUEST OF MIKE AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE AND DORADO DEVELOPMENT FROM R-40 TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG) At the December 14, 1993 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, Commissioners expressed concern about additional CG zoning along North Meridian Road. The suggestion was made to explore a less intensive commercial neighborhood (CN) designation rather than CG zoning with the applicant. The Commissioners then tabled this rezone request to allow Mr. Sciscoe to meet with the City Staff and evaluate the merits of Commercial Neighborhood zoning at this location. During the past three weeks I have been meeting with Mr. and Mrs. Sciscoe to review the Commissioners request. Mr. Sciscoe has considered the merits of Commercial Neighborhood zoning and his family's business plans. Mr. Sciscoe agreed with the Commissioners that the CN designation will blend with the neighborhood better and still allow his business to be developed. Mr. and Mrs. Sciscoe are very sensitive to good development in this area. They are committed to being agood neighbor and likewise they want compatible development"~ss.~ to their property. They believe that CN zoning will provide adequate safeguards for quality development in their neighborhood. Based on my review of our Ordinance and meetings with the Sciscoe's, I believe that their businesses can be developed within the CN zone and benefit the neighborhood. I recommend that the CN be approved rather than the CG zone as requested in their initial combined Sciscoe/Dorado rezone application. Because the CN zone is less intensive of a land use, I don't believe that a new public hearing or an amended application is necessary to facilitate this change. • • UB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS COUNCILMEN WAYNES.FORREY,AICP,CityClerk CITY OF MERIDIAN R A JANICE GASS, Treasurer ROBERTGI SLER BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO MAX YERRINGTON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney ROBERT D. CORRIE JOHN SHAWCROFT, waste water Supt. MERIDIAN, IDAHO $3642 Chairman Zoning s Planning KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 JIM JOHNSON GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 Centennial Coordinator GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor Memorandum To: Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council From: Wavne S. Forrey, AICP -Planning Director Date: November 5, 1993 Regarding :Request for Zone Change from R-40 to General Retail & Service Commercial (C-G) by Dorado Development plus Michael' and Cynthia Sciscoe. Zone change and land use request of C-G complies with the currentand proposed Comprehensive Plana This site is within the Mixed Planned Use bevelopment Land Use designation as described in the proposed Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Comprehensive Plan indicates a need for-service commercial facilities in this area. All public services are available or within reasonable service:areas for extension. This request is for zone change only. This property is a small portion of a larger parcel that was recently annexed as R-40 to allow an apartment complex. As the site improvement plans are prepared and submitted,. City sta#1"will review and approve any site designs to achieve a high quality project as called for in the Comprehensive Plan and in neighborhood meetings. OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY. AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS. Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART. Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY .~., ,~, .,_,..~ .,......~ .,_ A Good Place to Live ., ,. T -, - COUNCILMEN CITY OF MERIDIAN ' ~ ' -~ ~' ROBERTGI SLEA 33 EAST IDAHO t,.. ~~ ~ . - ... • •. _ . .. MAx YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor Chairman Zoning d Plan, JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coortlinatc PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your ^col4ments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian -4 ~vh;S ma>~ we have your answer by: q 3 TRANSMITTAL DATF_ : ~-~-j~b Q,I- ~s ,Igg!~ NEr~RING DATE : !WlJeh~~P.(' 9 )qg3 REQUEST: ~ ZOt'~F '1'Y'~ w~ mil' I'IO "b ~e~~/b ~ Cp-m.hp~[14.~ ~CG~ BY ~~GG ~~ . ~ 1 S q h Oe LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR ;:<:: RROJECT ZZ 1 ~ ~ . I'~1P•r;[~~ar• ~Q( JIM JOHNSON P/Z MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ,- CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER.GQ.-(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS} BOB GIESLER, C/C t~S WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) MAX~YERRINGiON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM ANO FINAL PLATS) BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDI CITY FILES /~~ ~~~ NG INSPECTOR OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~7~~; ~1:,av~~~~ ,C7=~.r POLICE DEPARTMENT ,~(,~ ;> f ~,~~• ~ ,y- ~, ~ ~~~,~ „r, ,~~ f.~ CITY ATTORNEY K-'~~ r3~v ~_v 7X,>K La ~j;,,,.,~ t~:., d. _ fti ~ 5~ GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER J _~u~-ivy Tc(rJL /3~ s~sv~ s~ ~; L-L /U.~~,,% ~ ~-, WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER m~~ ~ H L L e O J~ ~ /=~-:~ti,.s t y pu v f $'j~lc~• /2U' Q ~~ • ~PERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS __ _ _ -, _ -- Bob L. Haley ~Da EXCE~`~ ~ ~ DEP Dan Mabe, Flinan eD& Administration Z~ DIRECTORS ~r~~-~~~ j~ ~ Sheryl Belknap, Elementary /] ~ ~` Jim Carberry, Secondary Christine Donnell, Personnel Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 • PHONE(208)888-6701 November 2, 1993 City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Dorado Development Co. Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Dorado Development Co. This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is beyond capacity. The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a need for additional school construction. We ask your support for a development fee statute on new home construction or a real estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we ask that additional residential development be denied. Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school as it may be necessary to bus students to available classrooms across the district. We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike paths and safe pedestrian access. Sincerely, ~~~~~ an Mabe, Deputy Superintendent DM:gr i ~ n m m m - .r :i :.u .- r• ~~ .v .u ~. P [ .. . . .A u ~. ~_ -0 - ~_ _ - _ ~ u - ~. sY P s .. a- ~. r- .a [-. ... In L, x U Ih fh 3. O L t [ O m 1' S O 3 W P [T N -~ ~ [n i r 1 .. 1 1 ] [.] -. `'. ~. 2 -. ~ o o [r ::i° n i. ~[ ~~ lam : '~ := ` ' o o '~' , '~ _ Y~ : z . . • .~ ] .. [ ~ u .-. ~ U U '¢ ±1 YJ r.. U O i~ W L r 1- W L [n F-• W= T w W z N~ IL Z' m f•- la T rn m h [^. fn [`• m O [~ n 'u '~ V) In m 6T C'~ L 1 ['[] c+) -O I!a 6I N .4 ti r V] i it W [~] R] [.] 11 m 1 W ~ O i t II rt r 1 ; ~ [7 1~ I' _ [n N .~ I I a I r ]i I O) _ r I 11 . ~ I 1 6 ~ II I O ± U 1 N 11 ~ ~~- srr aoN '~i[o~mo N~~ • I u ~ 11 [no]n x •g ~ ~~m " m x" m ' LL .J s [~ in-0Ir']n i[nd.w'In Ii ~ ~ -•..~nn ii m N L l N c i w¢[u [ U i i u u ~ ['[] h en :p Y7 [y an ~ T L N P r• L» ~ ~• ~ 11 47 Iv [A M m 11 m r ~ • ~ 1 G ~ ~ W Rn = Ii1 11 ~. 1 Cn II N"] ^ Y '.ti N 11 +] 1 ry ~ - 1 '.. 1 ( 11 la 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 0 1' h t J [T J [L m G O• •~ V d m N rll N V) ~ b J J P~~ N d~ P L m Y7 rT N O h 11 In ~ N C.f 1 [ T m N m I! N P x aq F " .y 11 (~ -0 -![• -0 In d n m In Ica •O [[) N N Y~ la'1 r OZ' w 6 ~ = m n 11 J d .0 11 [n 1 -0 1 Y i O ~ J ~. M P J { ^ ~ ~ ¢ 11 m ~• ••• ~• ~~ ? ~ J • 11 P ~ I.L N T N N ' [ Y 1 LY l H M - ~ I X . S W 11 W w M I _ t k ?~ art X 9t X ~ at H K a '- G .-] .:- o a G ~` o n o ~ I it ~ 1 G- art H N :rt Yt Y ,1 n C O .~ •~ 6 p .~ O O O O O O O .j :; I 11 a~ o G o li : n ]~ Yi ]on v i n C O •O ~:. ? O •p G 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ O O G~ ~ . l ~ ~ D O O O Y G O -t• d 0 I, X N N m G P '... •i d_ m [L N [ ~ . ^ i V` h t(] I. t!] h ~ S A `~ ~ ry~ N m N n 11 T .p [~ II ? li x V) r Il] i) Y 1n 11'] 'a cn cu N 4!'l In ~O -0 ~ 6r 11 . 11 l p u [ ti N 11 ~ II I II m ' -. ti N ~ N N '1 1[1 11 11 N O O G ~^ ..) G O O Y'a O m 0 N ~ m II Ii ~ - .. -. ^ N 1 11 ~ -'Inm m r.-.-.msale'1mm m ' ~' I ~ ii U ~ 11 ~ u ~ 11 11 1 1~ 11 n = ~] ... .p h 4• m v O• ~~ P ~. d I!1 P as - 6 ...r . 1 m 11 ) 11 : 11 II 11 I ^ 11 n j :. 11 i' x N t [ri m P m O d w [~ N m .2 Ln F m . P-0 ~. O• P r d Rn h G 1 11 ~• I 11 2-0 11 []a IYj ^ ~ ., W ~ I ~ ~ ! m n a 11 N n N ~ +] N II +a N 1 11 11 t ; Ln N T m J t*f ~ m n = N-0 T~ N S O-0 m m m -0 P m P m v [n T P P i N G N-0 an II O-0 11 ••+ ~ [ n 11 N x 'M O ~• I ~' ; I 11 N.. m .-. N N N N I M ~ ~ ^ 111 1(f Y' 11 O ~ N rIr f_] N In u• In o- n. h In ~ G N .-r .. m . I u m ~ ~ Y, W ~-0 m O G [~ P m P m^-0 N d P= n ^ y (~ ~ ~ m P pT 1r~7 n Irm) I ~~T ~[ d ~) ~ ~ r u ~• ~ IN = N [/) In In N ^ 11 ^C II ~l Y ~ ~ -0 p N 11 ~ I ~ ~ d rh <y P x [~ O x O• h d ~. O 4L -0~ [n -0 m P P N I x" J C N J I h~ S I 11 -0 N = ^ h m m -0 7 d P^ P .. M [~ d R [r! 11 ~ + S 4.+ [D n I]) II . N~ ~ Y ~ 'O h r. -0 to P If1 [~ N m Ir9 [.] af) -0 [~ O M m I O -0 -p n T II aOfi P : j ma [ N U .•. 1 i I I ~ I M C I ~ [~f S In ryT-. I ] 1 U / r.. 11 ? [7: If] F Gn x S Jt at M -+t art K st Lt at K 7N ]`~ G •~ •~ 0 0 0 ~~• O O O •x J .? O O V q i 1 11 = Y _ [u N N N N N N d N N N N N E N I 1 3 W 0 O O x ~1 Q O N al s` 11 y 11 N N N S 4' 1 o m [n m { O .~1 (? M 1! M X ]n[ Y] rt Yt it M ]Iq it M it M M aK Y! ~t m .a O G 0 7 O •O O O 0 0 x 0 0 0 Z M 1 j Y arx N a~ I rD 11 ' _ O 1 -~ ~ Y A 0 0 0 0 •~ O O O M ~ O O O N O = .j O 7 O N O . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O I [Z 3 . j] 0 0 p .~ ~ 3 O~ O tl G P p f t [`~O ' I ~ I I I N I w ~ a s [ O p ~ W U T Y ' I rlr d C^ u ^= y m ~ 47 I M li) 1 . P I m M W .^ •'• ~ = ~ d Y~ I I N I 11 y ~ I , I 11 N r In d m [T In •s M [~ •O h 0~ [T m .o m 0 N G j I N I ~ M ~ w. e• r.m.~o•mmP molnrln r.]am i ! r -0 rn n i m n i 1 I i n ~ ;; .. x Y I - d ] .~ a o• [n N: -~ [n D ^-0 h O+ P m ~~ P P m~-0 d In P P Y I ' N N I -0 tl~ I ' u I Y N ~ .-. ]I! ii a I N T r N~ w i M W cn ~ r N O r1'1 N -A L~ -A m N ~ [.] •p p I ~ _ ~ m m r, m .~ [r -0 •_. P^ m o a -o n [~ p q -O ~r 1 [~ T I y') [mil Y m [.f j N N~ I f= N } cn 1 d In x O. lala gy .. ^ a w b If) .-0n [la •D t 11 P ~ S d Y m M l ~ H W N G m m nl ~ -. -0 1/') P P C, ~+ n m P 0~ M o m M-0 ~ I W I N x d ~ N~ d M . ~ ~ M^ 1 w x '. W ~-0 []] m -11 P m m [~ ~. d T f] m P I » [n ( m~ h m ;; [n I a ~. [~ y .if ^ M J _ ~ " + M ~ ; ~ . T d n ^ 11 x I I u7 d INI ~ 11 A 11 -• m m In m ;~ rn n 1]] [+) P a .-. ~ P ~ n C [~ m - . u m ¢ ! - - ! .r ii - ¢ , n c I ~„~ ( I c'..) m _ m x ] S In J _ n N m N O rte.. _ [n o ~ I ~ + r ~ ~o - o _. [n m a m P~ N P m m r m ~ ~ ` ^ ~. -' 1 f y M ~ 1 i ~ M ~ P ° o Y . a a ~ h m -v .a m m P n-0 m ` j ~ ! I w « m ~ s n r e u'] w . , ~:~ m X x .R ~_ ~ie yr[ re x M _ ..~ tl '• 1 ~ Irl F u m q : y1 c o a ~ c [ P ' N . D Y t iR X Ir Y ~ m se art ~t 11 n x 00 '- li l i] m N m • u [ In .~ ra 4 ~. [ ow I '? ° ~ Wm uP-al" 'n n ui ozln°[~i-r u m u If z ~ U ymr~ ' Ir, r. ~c+) r m vIr'1minsa O ~ e w .~ ~ ~ u -0o. w P j n , l A S [ ~ W ~ w ~ m ~ ' L N y [ [t • [D m P ~ G ! I ~ ~ .k: •~ O ~ N ^ W J I = p a.> 11 G F m ~ 2 O G ~ ^ -d r.. N r ^ ~n U -a [7 h LL c0 T P h IYS :y .~ r1 IY) rt1 -S ~ n tl 7 In to [~ 11 ~ Y ^ ) n ~ W m N 11 -0 - J • H [7 ! 11 p 11 l: ~ O . ~ S]'1 -~O .F.. [.~ r •L] .j ~S P ~ ^ a= -0 -0 in j ~ M [' I ~ N Y7 N I .~ = O O m 11 ~ 1' d a [~ .o- t T r n I w % ' I ~ N m ~ r . ~ ~ '^ '^ ii [» nl e y n r 1 ai :t _ N ~ ~ +- 4 ~ ti ~ M O M n O .1. 1 W O li r Y I II O 11 x M ~ _ _ -A []J _ ~ r c a . N 11'l P [ li `] 1 ~' 11 Y] tf ~ mi x y ~. r -. r in 1 i 1 .-~ Y1 .) rr7 1 r 1 _~ r [~ T If i o n I.r • ~ 1 W . l m [~ N `f 1 o I [V e ..a u 1 1 ~ ~ r O% ] 7 •O -0 ? ~ ~ N U] IA 4 In 1, 3 ~ ii ~. Q ~ ii 11 x C ~ i. .R ? S . L 11") - - ~ P 6> tl T .SU -~ m 1~ [~ O `J iL N 11 T N Y I .. -+ [u .-. [u N av ~. i [^ .-. rn n r P cn `I ii o w o n •- u ~ :u a in . u tl n L ' 0 ~ O. ~] n> [~. ~ -1 [~) ~ .{j `~ u. - ~ mm vi ' . A ] ~ T. ~~ .:~ 11 ~ u _ ~ 11 7 ? n ~ N x %~ - Ia ] ~ I- ~ d r •] h : •.] u r a w ~ ' ~ i]i ii ... ] ] n o [ n. r~ ~ ri c:a ° v= J u `L ~ II n ... 11 4l • ^J ]tt P r1J !~ 1 S . ^ L [~~ !1! a n ~f `t1 '~ Y) _ w r ~u fU rn Ir J rTi- ~^ lV]` /~ 11 [n _l R 1 r.f .~] r.'T 1 n] 11 T rt __ O .r r1 .t V1 Y7 [~ ~l ~ cu Y1 7 r ~ c7 ~. = „ . „ CJ S ••• 11 11 t11 • J .r. ... _ ; u_ ~ v a u ~ W u w 11 w e x .- ~ -• 11 n °J w u x 1 IL 2i aY. Z L- 4 S ~ : ? 1 C ~- 4 ~ Ir r r> - ._ . . W ~ ~ 1" T i~ rJ <G Z r- - rL w .. .Z .J . 1 11 W 11 Y ~~ 17 Y +J: li ' i i • ~ ] W u. ~ i,. a` ~ r_ z n Y. „ n .n x w z s. a. r _ ... I T: .:r r . _ <x a .- - _ , [.> • f-!acrt~ itrs •t:3~a? 3~i=t ~r^ r>as~rtrr_3i »s~ L-+s.sr ss7r~~t: i »tt ~eHr•3~ i ear t~3~i :s sss,:~»fif's, tL-+r^ t9•s>v i-3~~~sr^i»Q. C~~mt3~ia a»c3 3 s3a~r_~i~~~ri tFsrs "t~r~»rjfa~thrr-" _~i~esat:iL-)n s)7L-+r-~ i»-rit=~t3-s F-»rj 3x>t!-r •~~it s.s»ctL-+t~7t,-~rtab]ts sNit3-s at sa»3,=~s i t w~,•~ a~~L-.3 ut~3:r n~•c~~~r,r^y_ ~i »c~ wee t,~,wr_-»- t :~er_~» ssti,•ir_i~»r_~ ,.-+f•' t:3)r= C,~s»s»fsr^caA3 % r~,~»"'Y'i:9a~f'.?»ti ei3 L-s3 3tL~-Malrx:.~ a'S y.•r_t~t sffr"•rsi ~~r^ra•4'r°r• ~0 3x~fs•rrA tl~~at ~~~~rt L-+tist Ws»3rn~s 4-st+~L-,3s.st~3y »f:t~s:~_.-;~=,r-~r_y. 2~f-' YL11.1 wL~t~2s3 BS)7LY)L; _/i_~t1Y' T_YlY'Y^~~•p.:,»rier»r.ta tt~ r~F~r3 t9~~ sfisss~*_ut s~r~>rr3 Ltr-f:=a^tI~ c•+p~~r^r~cisste it. i.JY~ slirj n,:~tt~* •t S7t3t• ii; sw~:~::s -,•l;atr=ri t~3~e+~t it was r3i~~i32L-+sn~r9 ~+» C-fa ^~r^cisic.~,33r.. 3~ic~~L-,r y•~ -,rL~r•,st: r-=v~» ~~~~.3y~ •bL~ C-lot. I •.,u~}~.,=,e.: srortrs 31 •f i »cl i.:.s.s~i: •t~,nsr.~rrL~s~+. ~'sa d Y,_,~s fi »r_•! c:+»_,~ Ci t~ ~3rr3i »ar>z:~ L~r, i ~:? I •!• -~c•7 s,~r~s ri ssur^e3 y 3 i lc,~ ~•L1 •~~a i t L-+t~fL~r~ha>xi. TJ E.~IYS ..Y 3• ~ _) :13)7 ~7t1r"~.a»l: 1•L1 l.r :g .t t•l~Sal. y/llU ~i'Jtl Ti'1 .+1 ~.r~ ~ {.:i1~~ ~f ~t•~sr- ~t•t~tr_asrs»t: r''b~A1~., T3-si•+. wi33 ,t~sst: t_»~~r^~ that tl-s~r~ wa>»st: i~a_> ~ir,_y sss,:~rs.r »si ~s.s»t~s=r^4i•a»ri i»~4•, it>a3 3 t m~aY•i~>'s t~»_,+vnti~•. ~,'i r)l's•G "3"h~~».k _a s»s.sr~•) •l-L-~r y,t,~.ss- tr^csns~»rti:.uy n•~••ai•5t:as-,c~ i» 't+7i~, !>721't'tLr•.. . 3~~s~~~ 3~s~r'~,•r .irr, 1~J5tr FrL-+»xs 3~Si>=3•r~fa3 f=,:i•ac:L~ 3fsvrs ~r^L-+~s~r^t.Y 3i,~zc+»is fisar.~u~est tiHtes•rj f~1L-+vt=n~3a~r'. `~'. 195?., '3'L-,s f~3r. l~d,~,_y»r FL-~>•r^~rt ~5:~. 53-rnr^i St. i 3 ~:~f 3~3~s»iasrs ti+f then ~k.,ars~s ~l~•ar^ 5i ra t+»ti 3~3t_3 s ~:~sssas Wt:: ,ar^ i ~ i »a 3 ~ _y ~tf br,si i- t i'ri a rr•aL~»ta• rt>t~ ts~~,t i »s3 t:+tsr gsr'L-*~.rY't y 3~~ G-ti., tL1 L•»ai-+3r= "tsr^ 3'flnsi3•~ tc, rtf» t1 hL'~fNt+ #:+u:~i»~~~. L7ut: t•L~ sw3-seft wg• tret2i~v~ t,:+ ~~~ s»i~3ur>ri~rstFf»ct»sg=, rr»c,-+u»tt?!•r~r3s it 3'r2s:s ~~» »e~,=~;~~rtr•_s. t: L1 1r3f::•tE•tn with 3+3~ridiz+r> S~3t~nr>irtia a»c3 iL-~»i»r.~ .a »r3 's+1.5f~n7it t3-ri=! 3~ttt:r' tL, YL-+u. Ths f,:>31L-+wi»s~~ otft2 inst-~ t•!•st~ ar3r•~s~r>~»t rtvFiclti~r9 1-r~•twt~» s»y3~+3 f's i~ir•_ ~L~rr•eyt ~5±,_ ~t i 3r~st t~rxi l~4r^. 3'L-+s» ~Sr_+»t:r•r_+3~ S~ttt+r'»r~y fL-+r D~.,rtidr. 3)ee•vt~ 3 ~~t~tar'~) L~» 3harr_h •4, 1 59ys 3'l~r suz~ i» r•F_'.'•ZS'4L'~»4~ 1=rr^ »L"1t firc•~i r`i »g t,.•, ti iv i ~s~ t hc• pr•t+s.~rr^t_y~ in cltf,~tiL-+» i»tL, t~wL-, ~erfl~r•Fitt° 3c,t_s Fig Fsr•L-,s.+L->se:~si in th+.~ Fr:~ct:~ ..+»z:i ~i»r:3Sr••>s~~. a•~~a :^avhssri•l:tr.~ati ~~y !fr^. Cr^+_+ot•catL~r, nr^~ a~ f~~3 dL~w•~s .lis~~•eFaast, L•~f- the 3 ~yL-+ut~ L-+f t S-sea whL-+3 ~ ~r'o~rrt }~ i» r~urst i Len= i rrc 3 ur3 i r•,ss t 9rL•~. Y- xi :~+t i ~ h L-vsc•A ,=1 rxi I a+snsr~.t a. »enfM 'rrttsE+rf.~ svr>u3t3 s>sE-~ct~ it: anss-h'+.~~i~3e~• t~,c+ ~•rr.•~•t ~-,r.:~~c,~ts:i t~ L~ssssrs~r•r i ai i++..f i 1 r.Si »_~ :~ r.3 uer t: L, 3 at.`3t L>f" f,:+ot~zis,3t~• I~•ff: avtsi 3ai~3t~• aft£:r^ r~scL-,rr~ L-~~ •thi~; ~iz•~ C1 Y' I L', t K i~_ s~ividi»r~ ~~rL~rse!rt_y :in•tn tw,_+ 3,-,t~ ~~3~,:~ w,~tf2r! »~akt= the ~srset33t+ar eL-+nss>s~rcia3 IL~t ~:+» ury,~~cL~»L-+s»is~~3 rr_ss»»arrt_ #~ tsr3 i e~v~ t~i~at its i ~ y~L-,~~si 133 is •t 3'r ai• s.~ 7ac3< L->f unsi~rr~t a»tii » xs<.~ tL•, ~:.s~9a•t•3y hL"~Y,, t~~£• prL-+~~erty i~ 3~air3 t.,ut <i_ ~_ tt>e L`:+fclr~'~ ~i~s~. L~Sc ~rtar,~rty '~',:+r• pr't+~'~t+•_ £'ti sir>sm»~r••s:ia1 u~'~r~> >ssa•_r S~e+vrr_ t_au.fa•ti e`t,t>ri'9i mi•sfs»1:i~r"4't~•sr~iii»ru. ~3~>_-,t tl"si> cL~rr•L~ct e:~si•~tirx~ ~,-,» i »a~~ L,{-' •t:lsr •_ Ls r•7^L~ts»Lfa »~ k-sr•t~~,t>r't i r_=•, ~n•~ ~r~r-> s»i sa-•t~t at t:zf i» t: hr 5= ~aL^tSJ dY7~ ~S Y'rLj 3 »f_"3 21'.?^ ti•Lf ,._+»•1? tt £t~ '~:: L1 L1 =••, 3~; t•Pc114_,L'~ gE*L ~:iS'sibi:t fi Mfr>ri £~.~ ~~ti:~~-~,_s`~~r_i.. S='r^,;•s» 'r,'".>rha t+:l t .f=;R +r~,:>ts s4a 3 2 r>L~i,i ce:~ •~;->ta ar_-st~.s».2 :si :zi? ,-+s° tfs~ arr F+ •`.: r:, ttitc•~ ti ~•,.~>n3 ~,~,r_ ri f'tar` s: ~,ss»st .r-c i d 2 t.s-~t_~ i -~ L~r> i 1i -;C'r x 2 ~:~ Y . ~a3<„~~, i~:ss•:3ssfl h~t~r •~'~4st:~ _r-tai-,QrtY' i::,a t37er isJSS~sp,~ia•1:~ »,-,rtfi ice. L^t.4J^Y`~r"i ~'', r~yy£`t"~ i•.:.._f.:i 21 ,':~ i _ 't ~ ~ -: y L i <- _3 i :-• c, t•~> .~ n is a.st .i 3 :i zer:~,_ a_ r ...._ i;e*»t:.;~. ~';•,~r s7„~~:,~>.~:.>: •~t, thF i»s»r:riiai:~• s,->ut~i`> i~ rr::•,~t.tQ-'-.•:-i».•M1 s~•i@'hss>` S_:--^d L1 r' i_--~ ~L-,ni»z,t sn,hic~e••,»r^ v,+L~r^itss L-,ut v • • :•dt:= ~?rn•.3 :i t: •,: ~ t,rye i',->.3 3t~swi »~ s•~r.yr+,~~.;;a I =, :i f a # }}3 r-r.-.~ _o~ t~+•sn ~+,-+aY^rJ, v,t~~ts 3 r3 f: r. e4 t,3 r7 c.s•~ tt:., }_,sAt tr ~r ~+'• .ii+3 e• •t,:., cir~vr•=3 L,{., t f?e ~,y,,~,~.,r.r,t y, . *;:~r• t'?ta u•:as_s_ ~~_~ ,:?isi'Ii»t'r_3 :s.» >~s.tr t:\Y'i.s~ina3 r^~:..>.,a»e ss.sts>sat•taI s'1r)Lt c'13 ~\-, cta»fL-,r•A) t•~, t??e~• ir-~~:-sir^e:a ,•,f tts~ Gi'ty f•~lttor^»>~•y a.. #~-. Y^E' ;:,-.»sR~ t;~t± sNl-sL-+3 ss* }ar't,,>-~er't ~sr C--i'J rt~t3->eY^ t.f•Y~a» C-ice. Wtu f?.~•/s'~• >••~=c, uc:rat ~d s~•,~i Ltc>>x_•i= L,f ttst oY^c3i »i?rnr_t r~1~3 r_3~ sii~ai33L-+sn~':: Y•~_sic3~»•~ia3 u:~ta ~t C-•G P>^,~t:•erty- '3'f~i ~•tr::+teuA?r••nt: a+= nsaci>a ir••, t3» F R• F h~a_+ r.att?er r_t,nfue.r,d +..ss,• tilt.ssa t~-, i-•:7r= stats.sry7 r.~f' tts~~ T>^t,r,td!Y^$_y.• t~L~ ti~~ is»»rs=fixate »L~r••t3?~ ~.,r>i »3 C-U a»d r~cr+_s~,i ec! 4a~ r~s.id~rsti a3 #_,t~t3~. ~:. a3s:•.:, uY,tjs::•r•=~••t;:sr,ci t`>i~: ~~r,:,s~zrt~}~ ~,~ i~f_ Y•s~~s~»fiI•Y' ~', l5>`r: i'?Ar^ra c3. TlstL s~ac#_••~ t, »c~ 3=]r7di »>~n tveicra re f'L Y'~ }~, Z~3": f' }?Y'l, b=~i•'Y'~`yr ': L', '~: 3'S t'? »£l Y'~•SS ]r~ f`_'Y•Y'{,Y' 13. Y_!. "=-5]Y)L~3E? fi3AS.i ,~.)~ Y^e'i3•]tjf°>'7CL~" L•,» t?r?1y~f> Gt '~i_ F.S»d a'iS~r_~r]» ,r •q] »f33~° #'aiASi3_y Y•Y_~a•~atix~ntia3:" L~r~ },~+~~± 7~ #y~)1. 3Y7 r.'i»y t°YY~»tt WE'• 2hY^~• !Ni 3 .~ ] YY rs tL', ^9fM 7 tC3~ tlU>` :2C+»i YYL_} rr~sa s.srti~rt ',:~> {°:-r•11 i f' ~-•G' ate»i ».~ a ~ tlssv c,-,»cP>^» wi t~ t.s`> ~. 3 f •th :~ s i <~ •s::t i 3 3 6~1 ~,rc\i~3 es»f spray wta ~,3 r.Aes:~e rtr..;ttiv£u wY^it•tf•n ditir^us~se»t.:st:iL~» L~f 'i'tsi~ ,ar•di»as»c>=., a»+~ ~azss.~•_:tttvet»•t 3_,~ >'•^=~vcrst ctrci»cire>t3->rr^ ri s~.h•t:~ t,, r'e_ai ds= t,r, '43.1 E" aY'L'\t"SE~7"f:•~r LS Y!~.3 ~ ~r3i t? L~~"°~a ]~L'~ ~)Y'L'1 j.1faY'•}: y! '~~. ~•••inr_•t L,F_'} o!= t:1?~ ~,Y^4-+~.,s:+r•ty fr•a~»t tse:~~ l.,s-±,~» r`e•~i rlr»t a a3 anr3 hr3s as-s~r:•~a2i»~ s~yats.sr~ Ianr~~.;ca}.~i»s~• i» exi~-~t~»r_•~ a3 Y's~r.+tiy~ rEra r^rc,~vt:•st t,rai r+.r~ rrI 3•_~sa+~d tL+ 3 ea3vi~> a»~i is»~-,>•t,v>*~ s.ss~+an w3-sei? Y.,•i_,ts ~s„atSz an 3.3~ _~~t~»r.•#c) rzst3~rar 't:t•san cte~~tY`~-,y 1-.tsr.r l-~ee+vt: ifu3 fr`,-+Y-Yt;air ts3rr~~~.idy sate•+»rii»~ ir-, ,:~rris-:r t-r, t~~st• ir•> ~i :=~> 3airscist_?a}>;»r~ _asd~~ias;Sc. '~3~e }'~t~Y•• t i ,~» o•s~~ t 1•>e 3 ,-,} srr•~ r, 3 .ti» tr_, r3 t •r/E 3 L•,~, ,r,~sessnrr`c i a 3 3 y >;~.~nt~ainsa, s>sair,3Y- }-sar3ri»s~ and dY^iveway a] 3r..t»>ent.. IH's_= s,+,-,t.s 3 t~ t,e •,.~ry vsi .? 3 i »~ tL-, ~~r,~;urc~ a»y u}~s2r`ei3i ri~ ~~i= t`sr•.• ~;.r•a•N•se.3 s~+c~_7~srr.~»t~ »Erer9erl, ,•.,, a _, f;s>` a:=. •t tsc•-~• fer•,r_ i r>~n c,',»t~er^>r.+. t~r•~~~.s~)-st u}3 i» •ts~s+e f='at:: t ~~»d ~':i »r!i »r~~T •Fsynci»s~ }a3 a»s a~ r>Aady exi Est i» L,-~rnsdr:,- :=s bs.si 3 d.i nip F:+3t:~rs«r"r }}?Q ~•,_,utly z-»d r~t:+st: ~,~~u>x-3ar^i Fw of i,t.sr ~,rti,;?sert Y- 4,Ic:t swr.u3. d i~t> 3~sa}'3L\Y ~~\ r=rY't~r.•t~ f~r>r_ i»g c,n t~i?r n~-+Y^t!~ ~-s»t3 west. ri ?:l Y7 r< yi:?1.S i:i gS cl .ari ;S',1 Y' YG~LfY^ L.'L~»t~]!_IL"Y'A'~1,?ri ,'~7 t, l.SY' 17>'~'1~~?3Ei.~9- ~i Y?c~>^~ 3 yt r.• r.. `-.. ~~.. s`>s.se tL-, •t~lSr~ »S~i»4~ rl~.3~-~y=~• WL" 3•savsa Q>;~,r>>•a>?r>~~tr3 s,,ritls t3>i"s rrs>:~i:, Y•YE' rc_r,~,.s c ~~..~ < veer v,+o;s 3 t~ Br+~r^<ec .} a •t e d r•Yy ~~~~--,:~~ i #~ 3 r S7SL°:_'~»-i ~;., f >, isia;:~at~ ins fi!-» Vi=a »,::a3 _ ~a~~er~ ,,i= i?i~:i _• rr.•>:{urr=;#~, "~??aY')3i yi-,u- f ~G is~'oE ~,e o ~Q T~ _~~~~~T )0 T f ~F"SE-.vT -~- / V -_ / _ l ~\ '~`~ -~~ ~~, ,-,AFC ~ ~' ~ ;' ' yo ~_f -; :. `. , ,~_`/~ ;f: / 3 S.o: L/[q~ Gl-o i3~s//~ S ~ ~ 9 ' S~'s~o~ s 3 ~ -6 ~2ESidEVCe ~ I`~/ V 7 Cl/C.QGiZr6~.rii ~ ~ ! ; SSQC c/~1L,~ /yl~-,~?' ~7T~C N ~O A D 6-b ~z' /8-3 PA TAO ~Y-'/ C'A~2AGE /~-6 lb~vC',2~c SLAB / 3G.oG y3-e -> ~ ~ ~~ P ~ ~~ g ~ ~ ~ C° 1P 5 ,~ ?~ V~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ll, f ~ LQe,c EVE,e GiPEE.~ ' ~ ~~ ~ T,2~~ ~ ~ ~ i .~. ~/~ ~ ~ , o~ ~~Sc ~u5~-S PowE-e PoGc /~ ~3 ' 30 iT WrT~/ w,o %c HoU S ~s~o~ .G'Qos-.lo ~~ iZ' iB-3 PAS yY ~`i` (~~ S~o~ ~,~-o 131-'b /~-6 1 10-10 ~' S~o/o - - - - - - - S ` ~s ~o -6 l'oTTAGC Lv.o.eEi'lovst f'.~of'os~'1~ C -iY ~~-~~ ucsv --- GAGAGE ~o~.eso,~..~) ~: ~o ~g ,~. -? ~A~¢K/~/G ~ ,~,~A 3+ ~E~/vP,ey ~E,v~~. ~ -f ~~pjUG~ ~- - ~_, aweQPe~~ G,P~t7/EL - ~ A3"r /ham .r/ r ~'- o S /DE wAL,rL /d. /~7E,2 rQ .z'A.v ,p o A 1J 30~ L~ Q 0 ~ ~ 0 W °~ U O `0 q.. O 0 q • Thomas DEVELOPMENT' CO. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION March 7, 1994 Ms. Shari L. Stiles Meridian Planning Director 33 E. Idaho Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Ms. Stiles: U Thomas C. Mannschreck President 111 Auto Drive, Suite 105 Boise, Idaho 83709 FAX (208) 375-8985 Thank-you for meeting with me on Friday, March 4 to discuss the re-zone application pending on properties located on the east side of Meridian Road north of James Court. We support Mr. Sciscoe's application to re-zone his property to CC and our property to L0. Mr. Sciscoe has agreed to fence, at his expense, the easterly and southerly property lines of his property. We would like to work together with Mr. Sciscoe to make sure the fence is compatible with other development we will be doing to the east. The Meridian City Zoning & Development ordinance suggests a 35 ft. wide landscape vista on the Meridian Road frontage. We intend to build an attractively landscaped structure. However, until we have finalized our site plan, we are reluctant to agree to a landscape strip that is 35 ft. wide. We would rather work that out with you when we submit our building permit application. If yuu riav2 un;• further questions, please let me know. TCM/Cc cc: Robert R. Angell Larry D. Stevens m.~sas.a. FED-- 1 7-'94 T H U i E~ - 3~ ITC S O U T H ~ -- a.a~ ~ ~'~'7 FAX 7RAN3MI7'1`A!, Tb: WAYNE F4RRiEY SiX PAGES / ~~~ J P 0 1 Dear Wayne: Is there anyone besides yourself that K would be benefltlai for us to send the foiio~Mhp letter to in order for us to gat this problem worked out? The paper sent for us bo approve or dise~pprove seems pretty messed-up to us. We hadn't realized ~ would be the final Facts and Findings. What will happen it wa disapprove"T (t isn't at an what we had in mind for oar property and we're finding some problems with iCs camtsnb. Please inform. We know you are busy and we're sorry to have ba bother you with this matter, but it ready is af(~ectinp our whole situation in a negatnre wey. We'll be in Nebraska until February 21 st and in Boise on the 24th or so. t)ur phone >s 402-5!3.8672 and we can be reached by FAX at Thanks for your advice. Sincerety, ~ ~ ls~ cat- Miehaal aftd Cynthia Scisooe ~Yc~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~~f5sza~'. t~ , ~~ ( ~- x- ~ ~~~ 8533 FEE - i 7- 9 4 T H U 1 0~ 3 T I TiG $ Q U T H P 0 2 • • February 15,1994 Yo Whom h May Corwem: We have appreciated the efforts put forth bo vwrk out our Zoning Request which vMe filed in October, 1993. Regarding the most recent Findings of Fact and Conclusions sent to us far approYal, we have many cancem6. W9 are new to these proceedings, and perhaps this is typical of 2anittg Requests, but vvs find ourseMes very confused regarding sevenal issues and seek ciarlfrcation on how our rsquest has boen handed. May we ou9ine out ooncems: A) Before ever considering purchasing the property in question, wr: had iwb MAIN prerequlsibes: one, that we would be able ip (fire Fn fhe house, and two, !fiat we be able bo have our Retail 8oakstore on the property. As our inhiat request statr®s, ore are a family run business. A secondary desire was >v be allowed ltr have a small woodshop on the property, also, tf possible. B} Our first concern appeared bo be na problem witfr this property, sirfce ~e house bo the immediate north was already zoned Commercial t3eneral, and there were (and sti#l are) people residing in the house on the property. #n order bo determine whether our Second prerequisite w+auld be a pwbtem, we spoke with Mr. Wayn®1=orrey (current City Planner). At that meeting, Mr. Forney felt very positi~ae about a C-C~ zoning change due th the i3aat that the properly bo the north (which is s iwv-story house) was already zoned C-G and that it would fd in very well with the Meridian City Comprehensive Plan. He mentioned how beneficial R would be bo dp so, exp#ained the Zoning Request procedures and gave us the applications. ~ The first P ~ Z Meeting held on November 9th was a very positive one. The only complaint spoken was that of Doris Barnett, who owns (and currently iiveS on} the property directly to the north. She felt a fence ought to bs required between her and our property. T~iis rsauest was ruled out by ®Y~ VV~.~I ill lY Yi~~Y ~~VY~~~~~ ~V~N~V~• mention any further problems with the cquest and it was su~ested that h be approved far Facts and Find#ngs, which it then was. Nothing e#ss was brought bo our atter-tion at that meeting as being a problem. We subsequently purchased the property and cioaed in December. We found t1 renter for the duration of the Zoning Request procedures since we are unable as yet fin move there with our business. ~} Within the following month, ors heard from Mr.i=on~ey tltiat the City Attorney, Mr. Kirkston, was apparently having a problem of soma sort regarding the YonFnp request We were bold that since Meridian Road appeared ro be a maM entryway into the cFtyr, that Mc. Kirkston was teemed about the wide gerterat usage permitted by a Commercial General zoning and was fiee#ing the City needed by ha-~e some prvbeotion from unsightly businesses being put there iq the futons aRer we sold the property some years later. AAr. Forney discusspad the zoning option of Neighborhood-Commercial (GN) with us. We referred bathe Zoning and Development Ordinance (1983) for Meridian and believed the C-N Zoning bo be suitable for our purposes and had no problem with our request being changed bo that, which we communicated io Mr. Forney. F E B- i T- 9 4 T H U 1 0 3 8 ITC SOUTH p~ ~, _ • • This was conveyed to the Board and the decision rues to be made at the next P ~ I Meeting. E} We were informed that oonsideratjon for our request was postponed unlit ,ianuary 1 ith. At that meeting, Mr. Torrey presGrrted our new request end since a G-M designatJort requires that the property owner work directly with a Gig Planning and caning t~icial to approve the proposed business, ho asked that w+e be able to wrxk with himself due to his knowledge oi' our proposal. Fie already knew that it would fit into the plan'far the area, not being unsightly in appearanc% etc. We aron't exactly suns what the decision regarding this request fumed out to be at this meeting. We keen Mr_ Farrey had received sa~q sat of okay h> deal! directly with Mr. iCirkston on some of the details. Mr. IGrksiyan THBiV stated that he had a problem with the property being zoned Commercial at all, since the Taw states that one cannot reside on on a commercially coned property. How this can be, w~e don't understand! We know for a fact that the Barrens have recently purchased the property directly nod doer th the r°~ot1h, and vre kncyw for a factthey are residing an it and tfiat it >s zoned C-t:3. We didnY krww if it would be appropriate for us to bring this up with the turd ak the meeting, so vve did not ~ We subsequently spoke with Mr. Forrey tQ inquire what decision had been made regarding ths C-N Zoning. Fie informed us that there didn't appear ~ be a big problem, but that we'd need to work out something in writing and R would need tD be agreed upon between Mr. tCiriESton and oursalvres. t3aing urrfamili2ir with what was goir-q on anyway, we agreed to have Mr. Kirkston wgrk out the "agraemenC' since he would need to approve it in the end. We also believed that it was clearly sated in our Zoning Request exactly what we were desiring. Since he had read that, vit6 felt okay about this. G} We had been planning a family trip to Nebraska for months prior to theca problerr~ and had fia leave the area, so Mr. Forrey sent the proposal that Mr. MCirtcstnn had written up to our Nebraska location. This turns out m be the Findings of Fact and Conclusions that we are herein speaking of. The descriptions in this paper are so much lit opposition tv what we initially requested in the first piece. and wee are very confused as ba how aft of these changes came b be. We feel we've!' been misinfiormeA (possibly just due to our ignorance of the of'ficia! sounding language used at the meetings) about what had taken place prier do this. We feel vre have been left out of this decision altogether. is GIs typical of these procedures? K appears by this paper, that Mr. iGrkston has made certain deductions that we had rw idea were even problems or considerations. We respect Mr. Kiricston's position as City Attorney, we just wonder where these issues came from, because tt,e~y vNete never verbalized at either of the public meetings. R states at the end of the report, that if we do not agree with the findings that it is recommended that our !-ppl'~ation be denledi By the way, the Findings of Fact even have pn~perty spoken of hx n3mne request that are not e~nen irwiuded in the original request How aouid 4ve even oa~sider approving or disspproving nezoNng property that has no te>r~one requesfed7 We are hereby requesting permission to sit dovm with Mr. Forrey and Mr. NGricsbon to discuss the zoning request that we initially flied so that we can clearly understand the issues brrwght up in The Findings and Fact since we w~ero not made aware of them otherwise. iNe believed that this was to be the case already. We had no idea this was F E D- 1?- 9 4 T H U 1@ C~ ITC S O U T H • P_ 0 4 to be written up as our last option or we would Haver have agreed to it being wr'dten without us. K necessary, vre can type up a detailed fist df the areas in question on the Findings and Fad that are confusing us. There are also a couple of areas of inconsistency. Otherwise, we wilt be back in fawn on the 24th of Fetuuary, a-nd Can meet with you after that dat$. We do have one further request Since we were under the impression (as a result of our talks with Mr. Forrey ttnd how the meetings were sounding by us), that things were going okay with our zonins roquest, we had planned to move onto the property by March ist. Qur renters will be moving and N+e have made arrangements ~ relocate our hams and our bookstore. Realizing that we cannot as yet open our Retail Bppkatore on the property until, and ff, the zoning is wvriuxi out, irt, #here any possibility of our at feast operating the Mail Order end of our book business thorn tl~e e~dsting garage on the propertlR A srnali portion of the book business is mail order and this way, we wouldn't have to give up ALL of our income from the bookstore by closing down completely d this can be a~provad by March 1st please inform whether lfiis is a possibility or not so that we can deride upon our living situation, Sincerely, Michael and ntitia Sciscoe F E B- 1?- 9 4 T H U 1 0~ ITC SOUTH • P-~ S THE FOLLdWING OUTLINES THE PROBLEMS fOUNQ W17HiN THE FACTS AND FIiVDeNOS qJ CIUESTION A. Wa initlatly requested C-G zoning because the properly directly north of this one is already zoned C-G. The owner directly south is also requesting C-G and has business plans for that property also. Wa haw absolufiely no immediate plans t4 salt our property, but had assumed that we would be selling down the road at some time. We felt assured about our zoning request since the house ~ the north K already coned C-0 and the City planner, when asked. felt positive about the idea and encouraged us. When the time comes (or us do relocate, wq bedeved the new buyer would most likely ITT be interested in living on the property since it wouk be "sandwiched" between two commercial properties and ptbbabty would have business plans for the house ado. This gave us confidence in proc~eding eo purchase the property, as we have done in the meantime. With the proposal bo keep the louse paR of the property as residential {Paget 6, #t8}, we aro now unsure as to haw much trouble we wire hav~a in seNir~ th9 property when it becomes necessary. Petits as oursehres, seeking a (amity run business setup like we believed thi: to be, are few and far between. t3. Can you please give us roference l~or the law meting that one canncrt reside on Commeroial propattY {Page 8, #167 ff such is factual, what will be done about the residents to the narth7 k would appear that the law th beinS broken here. Rage 7, ~tAc is in emvr in that the CA toned property direc~y north has beer- Left out of the neighborhood descripibon. C, C-G zoning far all, as ir~tiaity requested, would also require the least amount of setback space. Being our property already has such a srnal! area for our business. the oilier proposed =onings beside8 C-G ~ 8, ~ would require so much additional set back, that it would leave very fitti®, if any, space for dur purposes at aN. Our understanding is that the house and the leftover space (for the business} would be made into two rroparata lots each with diifenant Yonings. We already have tirni0ed space do build on--the separate loth as regerlrod iby separate zonings would d4' away with cwt business specs altogether due to the extra set backs, not allv~wing us tD he able do have any business there. p, if the law does, in fact, allow people to reside on Commeroial properly (as is currontiy occurring throughout Meridian, even with recently purchased properties such as the Barr~etts}, and i# die only other concam is that Meridian Road not have business' located thereon that w~aald not be appropriaba for a ally entrywrty, aan"t the taro on page ;f, f13 be incorporated? tt states that the city has authority bo place conditions on a rer~an0. Can't the Board simply require that atf owners of Gt3 property in question be roquirtrd to harne business' preapproved, or be required to have zoning changed too a lesser Commerolal zoning at the time of any resale? Since the Board has expressed acceptance of both Sdscoe's and Dowado's proposed usage ~ the property in question, this would suro seem bo simpilltr things t~nr aH parties invoeved in the request ss~++~-~-~~- The following lists discrepancies found in the Facts and Findings that we'd like th bring th your atkention: 1. Page 2, #'s 2 and 3 mention 7.21 acres and Page 7. #t9 mention the proposal to zone 7.21 acres located behind the properties In question, as l-O. That property i$ not included in this request Please see property deascrlptbn In our original totting request 2. Page 7, #8 shows a recommended t:-C zcminy for our business and Page a #10 shows a C-N rocommendation far the same. B, Page 2, #2 states 'that there is a sinpie iamity residence fie the north... " The property loo the immediate north is zoned C-C3 and has a couple Irving on the property. F E B- 1 7 -'9 4 T H U 1@ 4 0 ITC S O U T H P- ~'6 •y Page 7, lilac alas negieots to mention this fact. K again states °single family residential'. This fad seems to bs ovedaoked altogether. 6eing that it appears to us to be a venr imDOrtant detail oonoeming our whole toning requ~ we wanted to make sure the City Attorney and the Board were aware of this fact 4. Page 4, #10 and Page 8, #10 speak of fencing problems. Much attention appears to be ghren Tlo this issue. At the very first P 8 Z meeting held on November 9th, Mrs. Barrett (the neighbor directly fie the north) was the only person with objections to our coning request. b`he stated two things at that meeting. One, that she had received no ward of our int~iona. l1s your records indicate (Page 8, #1), notice was sent e~l~ining our ir>bsr-tiarrs. We oouldn"t unden3tand how she would have been natifed of the meeting she was in attiendance at oth$rwi~sa, artyavtry. two, that she felt ova ought to ba required to put fencing up between our properhr and hers since we vNero putting a business up. This issue appeared i9o have already been dealt w+th at that meeirrrp. k was stated iri the $vatd that since she already resided an Commercial property, this raquost could rrot ba considered, s(nca ther® ware no regulations requiring lancing be put up betwran iwo Commercial prope~ies and that it might ba d"rfferent if her properly had been Residential. She then sat down and ore haves not been ir-fvrmsd of any further oommunicatlons between het ahd the Board. Wa had not mentioned it. but vve had plena for f®ncirrfl anyway, whe#her it was required or nat. We must admit here, however, that we are quite baffled as to why this fencing issue has been given sa much emphasis here since h appear~ad to be dealt mith at the first meeting. We would greatly appredate your assistance In helping to solve r problems regarding these Fact and Findings. Thank you. k:h SCOe Cynthia isco MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: FEBRUARY 8, 1994 APPLICANT: DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 1 MIKE SCISCOE REQUEST: REOUEST FOR REZONE - TABLED AT JANUARY 11, 1994 MEETING AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA STREET NAME COMMITTE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: • GGfiG JAMES E. BRUCE, President GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary November 3, 1993 TO: Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe Dorado Development Co Inc 1711 N 30th Boise ID 83703 FROM: Larry Sale, Supervisor Development Services SUBJECT: MERIDIAN REZONE - MERIDIAN N/O JAMES R40 to CG Your application for the above referenced project was approved by the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District on November 3, 1993. The attached staff report lists the conditions of approval and street improvements which are required. If you have any questions, cc: Development Services Chron Meridian City Hall please feel free to call me at 345-7680. ., ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 G r~ JAMES E. BRUCE, President GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary TO. ACHD Commission INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE MERRZMER/DSTECH 11-3-93 DATE: Octaber 28, 1993 FROM: Development Services SUBJECT: Meridian Rezone Meridian n/o James R40 to CG (Applicant - Dorado Development Co., Inc./Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe, 1711 N. 30th St., Boise, ID 83703) (Representative - Michael Sciscoe, same address) FACTS & FINDINGS: This site is a part of a larger area that was annexed into the City of Meridian this year with a zoning of R40 to allow devel- opment of a multi-family residential housing project. The District placed a requirement for a traffic study (not submit- ted yet) on the plat approval for Bridgewood Park and may be requiring that James Court be upgraded to a public collector street. 2. Meridian Road currently has b0-feet of right-of-way and is fully improved with a 41-foot street section. The street was reconstructed in 1992 and no pavement cuts will be allowed without Commission approval. The 2000 Urban Functional Street Classification Map designates Meridian as a minor arterial roadway. The District requires a minimum of 90-feet of right-of-way on arterials in an urban impact area, width sufficient for 5 traffic lanes, 5-foot sidewalks, and bicycle pathways. The ultimate. right-of-way will be acquired when a specific development plan is submitted.. 3. James Court is a private street on an easement that is im- proved with a curb along the south side and 20-feet of pav- ing. The approach at Meridian Road. is 24-feet wide and is too • 1. Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe are requesting a rezone from R-40 'to CG for 1.0 acre of property located at the northeast corner of Meridian. Road and James Court. The requested zoning desig- nation of CG (General Commercial) will allow construction of an office building on the site. • ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 ~~ieridian Rezone Meridian n/o James R~to CG October 28, 19~ Page 2 narrow to handle the potential traffic from a proposed 80-unit stibdiwision (Bridgewood Park) at the east end. of the street along with the existing apartment complex (50 living units access James Court), and also whatever may be built on subject property (assuming it takes access to this street). 4. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridi- an Planning & Zoning Commission on November 9, 1993. If the rezone is approved and. development proceeds, the District will provide the fallowing recommendations to Meridian Planning & ?oning as conditions for approval. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Submit a Traffic Impact Study to the District. Coordinate with Traffic Services Department prior to beginning the study. Additional requirements may be imposed pending the findings of the study and any design engineering work accom- plished prior to the District's review and approval of the study is entirely at the risk of the applicant.. 2. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridi- an abutting parcel (15 additional feet). The owner will. be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. 3. Utility street cuts in the. new pavement on Meridian Raad will not be allowed unless approved by the District. Commission. 4. Access to Meridian Road and .James Court will be restricted. Coordinate with District staff prior to submitting a specific development plan. 5. Replace unused curb cuts on Meridian Road with standard curb, gutter and sidewalk. 6. Provide a minimum of 40-feet of right-of-way and a 41-foot street section on James Court from Meridian Road to the east- ern boundary of subject parcel. Reconstruct the existing roadway section to District standards. The existing curb and 4-foot sidewalk may be retained. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS• 7. Street and drainage i,•nprovements required in the public right- of-way shall. be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies.. • .•Ieridian Rezone Mer~an T1~J James R~0 to CC~ ~ctobnr 28, 1993 ~?aae ? 3. T;ed.icated streets and. drainage systems shall :oe designed. and constructed in conformance with District "standards and i~o1i-- ~.ies . 9, Specifications, land Surveys, reports, plats, d_rawi.ngs, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACRD shall. be aealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with T_daho Code., erection 54-1215. :;_0. Provide written approval from the appropriate irriga- tion/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 11. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, age appurtenances, etc.) outside of the l~ravements. Authorization. f.or relocat from the appropriate entity. 7.2. Continue existing irrig~i.tion and drainage cel. irrigation and drain- proposed street i.m- ions shall be obtained st,~stems .cross par- 13. Submit throe sets of street construction plans to the District. for review and appropriate action. 14. Submit site drainage plans and calculations ~L-or review and appropriate action by ACHD. The proposed drainage system shall conform t.o the. requirements of the City of Meridian and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage f acilities shall be located in the publir. right-of-way or in a drainage easement set aside specif- ~cally for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other ~,aluable amenities placed in said easement. 1.5. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACrID. 16. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. 17. .;nstall a stop sign on Query unsignalized approach :~f a project street to an intersection involving a co.l.lector or arterial as the crass-street. The stop sign shall be in- atalled when the project street is first accessible to the. motoring public. 18. A right-of-way permit must be obtained. from ACHD for all street and utility construction within the public right.-of- .Meridian Rezon~ Meridian n/o James October 28, 19_. :Pr3yE3 ~~ R. to CG way. Contact Construction. Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file n~unberl for details. 19. T~ request for modification, variance ar waiver of any require- ment or policy outlined herein shall. be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within. l5 calendar days of tree original Cammi.ssian action. The request shall include a statement r~xplaining why such a requirement would result. in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING: DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: I~a:rrv sale ~IOV 0 31963 ~. CENTRAL ~ ~ •• DISTRICT ~ '~ ''` Retum to: HEALTH ~~~ - '~~ ~" DEPARTMENT ~ ~ ~ ' ..~ q -, f' ^ Boise REVIEW SHEET -°: .- . -.. - ^Eagle ^ Garden City Rezone # ~'~~ J ~` ~= ~ Kuna~n Conditional Use # ^ ACz Preliminmary/,~F7inal/Sho77l~rt~P/lat V U~'L~1-t~ t~ J/E~~~jy ~-i-~ / C- C.~ /~ir'.~.Y.e ~i.:.Y ~ Yi/T~ /.A ~C /f C' N ^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal. ^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewge disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be bcated above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet ~- 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: `~ Central sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water well ^ Interim sewage ®. Central water ^ Individual sewage ^ Individual water ^ 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Weffare, Division of Environmental Quality: ^ Central sewage ^ Community sewage system^ Community water S l ^ ewage dry ines ^ Central water ^ 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probelm. ^ 10. This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined 'rf other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any: ^ Food establishment ^ Swimming pools or spas ^ Beverage establishment ^ Grocery store ^ 13. ^ Child Care Center DATE: ~ ~ /9~ Reviewed by: ~ i~°G~ CDHD 10-91 rcb • FLUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ~ ~~ " - -• OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live ,., ,., .._ ., WAYNES.FORREY.AICP,CityClerk JANICE GASS. Treasurer CITY OF MERIDIAN ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " COUNCt.MEN RR I BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Suot. , BERTGI S ER WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO _ ~ MAX YERRINGTON JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ~~jjFm~~o~~® W I ~ ROBERTD.CORRIE BILL GORDON. Police Chiet Phone (208) 888-4433 ~ Li ~ ChairmanZonfng Q, Plam JIM JOHNSON GARY SMITH. P.E.. City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 ~ ~ O `+ ~ ~~~~ Centennial Coo-dfnatc GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEV ELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your co meets and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian ~ ~yl' ~,,,^; s may we have your answer by : A~ rlfs<+•-., ~ t~ q TRANSMITTAL DATE: (~-~-~~~- IS igg~ HEARING DATE:!~oyewt~ 9 )q9~3 REQUEST: ~ Zp -t'Y` ~- I'IO ~ ~ Cpirnw.p,/~ 1 ~ CG BY : ~~'GG~ ~)P a P~~nDw,o__~- /',. ~ .nn :. L., ~ 1 ~ _ 1' tn-...._U _ C_ LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Z21O ~. ~P.r;[~iGr• ~a( r'~D 1`~ 0~' ~2a-rv [~. ~-^ 1'nP.r"i G i [i<rL ~~- JIM JOHNSON P/Z "MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JIM SHEARER, P/I ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH GRANT KINGSfORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C ~cJTiFRS IRRIGATION DISTPICJ BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO r(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BOB GIESLER, C/C t1.5 WEST {PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) MAX~YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND fINAI PLATS) BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. CITY FILES BUILDING INSPECTOR OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the rezone for CITY ATTORNEY ora o eve opment Co. Michael and Cynthia GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER Sciscoe at 2210 North Meridian Road. WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER _ ill HPncnn Fnraman ~ Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District -a. {/S t'' T .1 • • ~~ . . ~ • 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 28 October 1993 Bob Angell Dorado Development Co., Inc. P. 0. Box 2666 Boise, ID 83701 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 RE: Land Use Change Application for Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe Dear Mr. Angell: Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above- referenced development. You are also being sent a complete packet of information concerning Land Use Change, urban irrigation, and exclusion. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call on Donna Moore at the District's office or John Anderson, the District's Water Superintendent at the District's shop. Sincerely, DAREN R. COON, SECRETARY/TREASURER NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT DRC/dnm cc: File Water Superintendent - Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe ~+l''j`~ City of Meridian enc . - - - -. ., , ,.>. __ _ ~- :may - ~, ~_ -- APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 r • BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AD ZONING COMMISSION DORADO DEVELOPMENT & MICHAEL AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE REZONE APPLICATION 2210 N. MERIDIAN ROAD MERIDI~3.N, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled matter having come on for public hearing March 9, 1993, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., the Petitioners, Michael Sciscoe and Bob Angel, for Dorado Development, appearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian having duly considered the evidence and the matter, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That a notice of a public hearing on the Rezone Application was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for November 9, 1993, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the November 9, 1993, hearing; that the matter was again considered at the December 14, 1993, and January 11, 1994, meeting, that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to the newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That this property is located within the City of Meridian FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 1 • • and is owned by the Applicant, Dorado Development Company, and which property is described in the application which description is incorporated herein; that the property is presently zoned R-40 Residential but is now vacant land; the area in which Applicants' property is located has a house located thereon and the remainder of the property is vacant land; that there is an apartment complex to the south; there is a residential subdivision to the east across Meridian Road; that there is a single family residence to the north; that there is substantial commercial development farther to the south; that it was stated in the public hearing that the property being purchased by the Sciscoe's is .41 of an acre and the remaining property to be used by Dorado Development is 7.21 acres. 3. As stated above, the property is presently zoned R-40, Residential; the Applicants have requested that the property zoned General Retail and Service Commercial (C-G) and the Sciscoe's propose to use the home as a home, operate a book store on the property, operate a small custom cabinetry and furniture business at the far end of the bookstore, and Dorado Development proposes to use the remainder of the property for a single level office building which would provide tenancy for professional uses such as doctors, dentist, attorneys, real estate and/or insurance agencies but the C-G zoning is requested. 4. That the C-G District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 11 follows: ~C-G) General Retail and Service Commercial: The purpose of the (C-G) District is to provide for commercial uses which are customarily operated entirely or almost entirely within a FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LA'r~ Page 2 • • building; to provide for a review of the impact of proposed commercial uses which are auto and service oriented and are located in close proximity to major highway or arterial streets; to fulfill the need of travel-related services as well as retail sales for the transient and permanent motoring public. All such districts shall be connected to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian, and shall not constitute strip commercial development and encourage clustering of commercial development. 5. That the property is contained in a Mixed /Planned Use Development area as shown on the Generalized Land Use Map of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 6. That the oroperty has frontage on Meridian Road; that Meridian Road is designated as an Entryway in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan; that the Entryway Corridors Goal Statement includes the following statement: "4.4U Encourage 35-foot landscaped setbacks for new development on entrance corridors. The City shall require, as a condition of development approval, landscaping along all entrance corridors. ." 7. That sewer and water is available to the property. 8. That comments were submitted by the City Engineer and are incorporated herein as are the comments of the Meridian Fire Department, the Central District Health Department, Meridian School District, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, and Meridian Planning Director. Those comments are incorporated herein as if set forth in herein. 9. That Planning Director submitted two comment sheets, one date November 5, 1993 and one dated January 6, 1994; that in the November comments he stated the zone change to C-G complied with the Comprehensive Plan, that the Comprehensive Plan indicates a FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 3 • • need for service commercial in this area, and that as site development plans are prepared and submitted, the City staff will review any site designs to achieve a high quality project as called _, ~ for the Comprehensive Plan; that in his January comments he stated that he had met with the Sciscoe, at the request of the Planning and Zoning Commission to discuss the C-G zoning, and it was agreed by the Sciscoe's that a C-N zone would allow them to do what they desired but would blend in better with what was already adjacent to the land; that similar discussions were not held with Dorado Development. 10. That the abutting neighbor to the north, Doris Baret, indicating that she was not sure what type of business was proposed on the property and that she desired that a fence be constructed betweenXhe property and this development. 11. That the property was recently annexed and zoned; that the requested zone was R-40. 12. T\hat the Limited Office District allows for professional offices; that Limited Office District, is set forth in 11-2-408 B 7. as follows: ,.(L-O) Limited Office District: The purpose of the (L-O) District is to permit the establishment of groupings of professional, researcYi, executive, administrative, accounting, clerical, stenographic, public service and similar uses. Research uses shall not involve heavy testing operations of any kind or product manufacturing of such a nature to create noise, vibration or emissions of a nature offensive to the overall purpose of this district. The L-O District is designed to act as a buffer between other more intense non- residential uses and high density residential uses, and is thus a transitional use. Connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer System of the City of Meridian is a requirement in this district. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 4 C~ 13. That the allowed uses in the C-G and L-O Districts are listed in 11-2-409, and such are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 14. That proper notice has been given as required by law and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission have been followed. COi3CLUS I ONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicants' property. 2. That the City has the authority to take judicial notice of its own ordinances, other governmental statues and ordinances, testimony that has been previously presented, and of actual conditions existing within the City and state. 3. That the City of Meridian has authority to place conditions upon granting a zoning amendment. 4. That the City has judged this Application for a zoning amendment upon the basis of guidelines contained in Section 11-2- 416 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and upon the basis of the Local Planning Act of 1975, Title 67 Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, and the record submitted to it and the things of which it can take judicial notice. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 5 • • 5. That the uses allowed in the C-G district are substantially more intensive than those allowed in the L-O district; that the Meridian zoning Ordinance allows only the listed allowed uses to be conducted in that zone. 6. That since there are various proposed uses on the land requested to be rezoned, including residential, retail, cabinetry, and offices, which are not allowed uses in all zones. i.e., residential uses are not allowed in the General Retail and Service Commercial district, it makes logical sense to zone for each proposed use rather than establish one zone that allows many intensive land uses, which may not be able to be controlled by the City; the concern of the City is that there is potential problem in zoning the property General Retail and Service Commercial and allow the proposed uses under that zone, but then have those uses change or fail and be replaced by more intensive uses allowed under that C--G zoning. 7. That it is concluded that measures need to be taken to allow the proposed uses, but limit the possibility of more intensive uses later. 8. That it is therefore concluded that the property should be rezoned to allow the uses set forth in the representations of the Applicants, but to deny the request to zone the entire parcel of property as General Retail and Service Commercial; that it is concluded that the .41 of an acres property to be used as a home and book store and cabinetry business should be divided and the parcel to~used as a residence zoned R-8, Residential, with the lot FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIO2dS GF LAW Page 6 • • meeting the lot requirements of that zone; that the remaining portion of the .41 of an acre to be used by the Sciscoe's as a book store and cabinetry business should be zoned C-C, Community Business District; that the 7.21 acres to be used for professional offices shall be zoned L-O, Limited Office. 9. That 11-2-416 (K) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian sets forth standards under which the City shall review applications far zoning amendments; that upon a review of those requirements and a review of the facts presented and conditions of the area, the Planning and Zoning Commission specifically concludes as follows: (a) The new zoning would be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and no Comprehensive Plan amendment is required; that the house has been on the property for a substantial length of time and can be allowed to continue even though the remainder of t:.~ property is zoned to commercial and limited office uses. (b) The area included in the application is not intended to be rezoned in the future, but is included in the Comprehensive Plan as a mixed and planned use area. (c) The area around the proposed zoning amendment is developed in a single family residential, multi-family residential, vacant land fashion, and substantial commercial Farther to the south and the new zoning would not be contrary to the existing uses. The land is shown in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a Mixed/Planned Use Development area. (d) There has been a change in the area which may dictate that the land should be rezoned, that change being its designation in the Comprehensive Plan. (e) No specific information was submitted by the Applicant regarding design, construction, operation, and overall plan for the land; that such information will have to be submitted and development controlled under a FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 7 • design review process. (f) The proposed use should not be hazardous or disturbing to the existing or future uses of the neighborhood, if the conditions set forth herein are complied with. (g) The property will be able to be adequately served with public facilities, and connection to municipal sewer and water is required. (h) The proposed uses would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and servir_es and would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. (i) The proposed uses should not involve any detrimental activity to any person's property or the general welfare. (j) Development may cause an increase in vehicular traffic and this problem would have to be addressed in the design of the area. (k) That this rezone will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any natural or scenic feature of major importance. (1) The proposed zoning amendment should be in the best interest of City of Meridian and the area if conditions were placed on the land and the applicant. 10. That if the property to be zoned C-N is adjacent to the property owned by Doris Baret and there will be paved parking adjacent or near her property, the design standards for off-street parking in 11-2 414 must be met, specifically including the fencing; that such design standards shall have to be met where ever the parking is located; if the Baret property will be adjacent to the home of the Sciscoe's fencing will be up to the parties involved. 11. That the Applicants, as a condition of the rezone, shall be required to meet the requirements of the 35 foot landscaped set FINDINGS OF FACT & COi3CLUSIONS OF LAW Page 8 • • back along Meridian Roaa. 12. That the Applicants must meet all of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and all of the requirements of the Ada County Highway District. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS GF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS p~,~©~~S The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby ~e~i~ these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER VOTED COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE VOTED COMMISSIONER SHEARER VOTED COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI VOTED CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DECISION ~'..3+tD RECOI~II~IENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that the rezone Application be approved as modified above. It is further recommended that if the Applicants do not agree with these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law teat the Application be denied. MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: FINDINGS OF FACT & CGNCLUSIGPIS Gr LAW Page 9 ..,fir .,* S • • t'ri r 4 Planning & Zoning January 11, 1994 Page 2 Johnson: Moved and seconded to approve the minutes with the corrections so stated, all in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #1: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR REZONE REQUEST BY DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND MIKE SCISCOE: TABLED AT DECEMBER 14, 1993 MEETING: Johnson: Any discussion regarding the Findings of Fact as prepared by our City Attorney. Rountree: Since the meeting between the developer and Wayne it appears that they have agreed to the suggestion that we made to' down scale zoning. I think that would require a change in the Findings of Fact and I put that forth for consideration. I believe we will have to change the Findings of Fact because it speaks of Commercial General. Crookston: That is correct, the concern that I have is having the rezone either totally as CG or totally as CN and still have a residence in there. Under our Ordinances that is not allowed. Something either needs to be done either the applicant needs to request that the residence be zoned some type of residence, residential. The R-40 doesn't align with the density of the single family dwelling. That just needs to be worked how that is going to be done. The other concern about even if we could zone the whole thing as CG or CN is that in the event that it is zoned that way then the applicant occupies the .house for a period of time and then says well I'm going to move my business, then you still have the property zoned as CG or CN and than a totally more intensive use goes in that we wouldn't have any input into. I think that is a concern. Johnson: What is your suggestion on how we work that out? Crookston: I think that needs to be addressed with the applicant, and see whether or not, from his testimony he said he was going live in the house. So, we need to sit down with the applicant and see what a proper residential district to rezone the property to would be. Rountree: Did you discuss that with him Wayne? Forrey: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, we are aware of this dilemma. Mr. and Mrs. Sciscoe are here, and one of the things I think we can do in the Ordinance is look at a Conditional Use Permit for maybe a portion of the use of that property within thee ~~:~+ • • Planning & Zoning January 11, 1994 Page 3 Commercial Neighborhood zone. It might be one way to alleviate that and put some time constraints. So if the property changes hands we are not locked into a higher intensity use occupying that home again. And the Sciscoe's have agreed to look at a Conditional Use Permit type of arrangement. Johnson: What is your thinking on that Tim? Hepper: Yes Crookston: You are saying Conditional Use for the house Forrey: For the home Crookston: For the home .and with a CN designation for the entire parcel? Forrey: Correct, including the Dorado portion as well not just the Sciscoe but the Dorado property. Crookston: I think we need to have an amendment to the application. Or at least an indication that they are applying for that or amending their application to that effect. Forrey: Mr. Chairman, would a development agreement be appropriate? Johnson: That would work. Forrey: Ok, something of that nature. Rountree: Would it require another hearing? Crookston: No. Johnson: Thanks Wayne. Rountree: Would that be stipulated in Findings of Facts or table it until we get the amendment? Hepper: I think we need to know if the owners are willing to do that. Crookston: They need to sign something to indicate that is what they want to do. If I receive that I can proceed with the Findings. So we can have them next meeting. Johnson: Okay, well then let's get together and do that. Anything else on that item? ~:,~.. • • Planning & Zoning January 11, 1994 Page 4 Shearer: We need a motion to table those Findings. Johnson: We need a motion to table it because its on the agenda. Shearer: Can Wayne prepare findings without a motion? Johnson: Well, he already has that motion to prepare Findings of Fact at the last meeting. Shearer: Are you sure? It seems like We sent that back to review. Johnson: No, that is why its on there for Findings of Fact. Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I move we table this item until the next regularly scheduled meeting. Hepper: Second Johnson: Moved and seconded to table this until the next regular meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #2: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR KING STREET STATION SUBDIVISION BY D.J. INVESTMENTS AND BRIGGS ENGINEERING: Johnson: Is there discussion concerning these Findings of Facts? Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I have a~question, the Findings state that these units need to have 2 car garages per unit, if the developer decides to go that way. it appears that it may be a major re-draw or re-design of that and I'm wondering if we need to see that or find out if it is feasible for him to do that,. if it is what kind of, how its going to effect the overall project. Johnson: At present the Ordinance requires, as I understand it, the 2 car garage because these are plotted as single family dwelling units, are they not? So they require a variance for that Ordinance. Hepper: I'm just wondering what that requirement Johnson: And you want to know whether or not that is feasible. Hepper: I'm wondering if the developer, if that is something he can work with or if he is going to have to re-design this whole project and maybe we need to start over on this thing if he is going to have to re-design the whole thing or should we just go • ium Amount: $ 45.00 S C H E D II L E- A Order No.: ST-92037425 PW Policy No.: 0-9993-67306 Date of Policy: JUNE 25, 1993 at 4:53 p.m. Amount of Insurance: $ 10,000.00 1. Name of Insured: ROBERT R. ANGELL AND LARRY D. STEVENS 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this Policy is: FEE SIMPLE 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at the date of policy vested in: ROBERT R. ANGELL, a married man, and LARRY D. STEVENS, a married man 4. The land referred to in this Policy is situate in State of IDAHO, County of ADA: PARCEL III COMMENCING at the section corner common to Sections 6 and 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, and Sections 1 and 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian thence North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 2141.22 feet to a point on the section line and on the center line of North Meridian Road, thence North 89 degrees 34'30" East, 30.00 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of-Way of said North Meridian Road, thence North 88 degrees 43'49" East, 328.22 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 83 degrees 49'27" East, 129.18 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 88 degrees 48'37" East, 389.26 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 31 degrees 03'37" East, 414.88 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 88 degrees 34'59" West, 1057.50 feet to a 1/2 inch -1- Owner's Schedule A !P`~ ~ • S9~.yo' /oS7. So' tr ~ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE i, 1993 PAGE 7 Carrie: I would like it stated that the minimum square footage should be 1350 sq. ft. Crookston: They have the option to go~under the Ordinance that allows a mix. Corrie: Thank you. Discussion on squat^e footages - see tape. Giesler^: In the Ordinance, I would like those manufactured homes to go under design review before they ar^e approved. The Motion was made by Yet^rington and seconded by Tolsma to appr^ove the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law with stipulations to include 1350 sgtirar^e foot home minimum, two car^ gar^age and design review. Kingsford: I'll appoint two Council members to be on the design r^evi ew boar^d, Bob Giesler and Bob Corrie. Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Giesler - Yea; Corrie - Yea; Tolsma - Yea; Motion Carried: All Yea: The Motion was made by Car^rie and seconded by Talsma to have the attorney prepare an Or^dinance annexing and zoning Conifer Subdivision. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #~: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST BY HIMERICH AND DORADO DEVELOPMENT: The Motion was made by Corrie and seconded by Yer^rington to appr^ove the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as prepared. Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Giesler - Yea; Cot^r^ie - Yea; Tolsma - Yea; Motion Carried: All Yea: ` ~ ~ . • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1993 PAGE 8 The Motion was made by Yet^rington and seconded by Tolsma to have the attorney prepare an Ot^dinance annexing and zoning Himerich and Dorado Development. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #3: ORDINANCE #601: VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR MICHELS AND MICHELS: Kingsfoi^d: AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF DORIS SUBDIVISION, OF RECORD IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, SPECIFICALLY THE EASEMENTS LOCATED BETWEEN LOT 1 AND BLDCK 2 DORIS SUBDIVISION, LOT 1 AND 3 BLOCK 2, DORIS SUBDIVISION, AND LOT 2 AND 3 BLOCK 2 DORIS SUBDIVISION, MERIDIAN, IDAHO, ACCORDING "TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, IN BOOK 16 OF PLATS AT PAGE 1080, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is thet^e anyone present who wishes Ordinance #601 read in it's entir^ety? No response. The Matian was made by Tolsma and seconded by Yerrington that the rules and pt^ovisions of 50-90t and all ra~les and provisions t^equiring that Ordinance be read on three differ^ent days be dispensed with and that Drdinance #601 be passed and approved. Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Giesler - Yea; Corrie - Yea; Tolsma - Yea; Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #5: WATER AND SEWER DELINQUENCIES: Kingsford: This is to inform you in wt^iting, if you choose ta, you have the right to a pre-determination hearing at 7:30 P. M., 06!01/93 before the Mayot^ and City Council, to appeai^ in person to be .,judged an the facts and defend the claim made by the City that yout^ water^, sewer^, tt^ash bill is delinquent. You may retain Counsel. This service will be discontinued on June 16, 1993 unless payment is t^eceived in full. Is there anyone from the public that wo~ild like to contest their water, sewer, trash delinquency? No response. The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Yer^rington to apps^ove of the tut^n off list. Motion Carried: All Yea: Y • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 16, 1993 PAGE 13 Kingsfor^d: The front half of it is. Arnold: Well it's been there quite a while hasn't it? Kingsford: It's only been there four or five year^s. Thank you we appreciate your concerns. Anyone else to testify? No r^esponse. I will close the public hearing. Counselor, is that differ^ent testimony than appeared at Planning and Zoning? Crookston: I think the conflict between the two ordinances, it was addr^essed in the Findings but there was no solution given at the Planning and Zoning level. That needs to be remedied. I would have to review the Findings again to see if they are basically the same. The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Corrie to have the attorney review and amend the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #5: PUBLIC HEARING: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST BY HIMERICH AND DORADO DEVELOPMENT: Kingsford: At this time I will open the Public Hearing. Is then^e an owner or representative present to testify? Jeff Huber, 5209 tin-audible) Way, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Huber:. I am here tonight representing Dorado Development. We have requested annexation and a rezone for approximately 7.6 acres on N. Mer^idian Road. As per your Planning Departments r^equest we have included the house parcel where Mrs. Himerich lives in our request now. Our rezone request is for R-40 with a •r^estrictive covenant for 25 units per acre. We found that R-15 was not quite dense enough for us to build a project like this and provide the amenities that we'd like to provide and we found that R-40 was to dense but 25 units per acre with a restrictive covenant on the R-40 wo~~ld work well for us. The site we feel is located close to the downtown which is a good location for multi- family housing. It's close to the shopping and we feel that it would work well both for the City and for our project. tPresented drawings and explained to Council - see tape) Our • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 18, 1943 PAGE 14 ingt^ess and egress will be taken off of James Court and off of Meridian Road, we've been working with the property owner to the north for an access paint here - shown on map. We can easily access off into James Court should that become a Collector. We're working with ACRD and the Hunemiller project to the south of us. We've agreed to participate equally in the creation of a Collector Stt^eet. I have been speaking with the attorney for James Court, although he has not got a firm answer from his clients yet. I believe we can pt^ovide a nice Collector here. After we dedicate the easement that ACRD will need for right of way we'll end up with about 6.4 acres which if our rezone is approved would give us approximately 162 units maximum. We would phase that in two phases star^ting next summer. First phase will be approximately 80 units and approximately BSI in the near future. We would request that you approve the rezone and the annexation t oni ght and i f yo~.~ have any questions I' d be happy t o answer them. Giesler: You say that you've built this type of project in Boise, could you give me the names of those please? Huber: We're building this particulaT^ project at the corner^ of Ustick and Five Mile Road and it's called West Ridge Apar^tments. These at^e going to be high end, upscale apartments with lots of amenities. Giesler: You don't have anything completed in Boise at this time? Huber: No. The Cherry Lane Apartments here we have built. Giesler: Could you tell me what the square footage of these units at^e going to be and the price range? Huber: I'd like Mr. Angel to address those particular questions. Tolsma: Questioned drawing. These are all ACRD public streets that go around this project? Huber: Correct. Tolsma: How would the people feel about having their garages across the street ft^om the apartment their living in? Huber: Thet^e are carports and garages. This is a conceptual plan. texplained - see tape) • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 18, 1993 RAGE iv Carrie: The roads on the inside it shows here will not be dedicated ACRD roadways. Huber: No. Cowie : So in other wot^ds i f we have a f ire in there, peopl a are pat^ked in then^e, we can't get the trucks in there, there' s nothing we can da about it. Huber: No thei^e will be an access here and two access here. tShown on drawing) This plan has been approved by the Boise Fire Department and I believe would meet any standar^d that the Meridian Fire Department would wish there. Cowie: We've run into problems with parking. We can't regulate the parking in there. Concerns about roads not being dedicated. Huber^: We would wish to come back to you with our final plan and have that approved by your Fire Department. Crookston: If I remember correctly Mr. Huber, you indicated at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting that the pool and I think you mentioned one other amenity would be completed in the first phase. Huber: That's correct. Crookston: What total amenities would be included in that fit^st phase? Hubei^: We'd put all of the amenities in the first phase. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Aob Angel, 35 Horizon Drive, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Angel: I'll be happy to take any questions on specifics if you'd 1 ike. Giesler: Are you involved in the pt^oject that he spoke about at Ustick and Five Mile? Angel: Yes sir. • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 19, 1993 RAGE 16 Giesler: My other^ q~~est i ons were the square footage of the apartments and the price range and whether then^e basically a low income apar^tment. Angel: They ar^e not a low income apartment. The average unit mix is going to be split as follows: First phase would be 80 tirnits of which the mix would be approximately 50% - one bedroom units, 40% - two beds^oom units and 8 - 3 bedroom units which would represent approximately 10%. The square footage of the one bedroom units are around 700 5q. feet. Dur two bedroom units of which there are two floor plans will average about 925 square feet and our three bedroom apartments will be 1075 square feet. The anticipated rental ranges for the one bedroom units will be in the area of 3500.00 per month. The two beds^oom units will average around 575.00 to X600.00 with the two floor plans, and the three bedroom units will be at 6700.00 per month. Kingsfor^d: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Doris Har^rett, 7920 W. Apache, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Barrett: tpresented each Council member with handout) We just r^ecently purchased the property at 2250 N. Meridian Rd., which is .just north of the complex that is being discussed tonight. I have seven^al concerns. First of all when we wer^e in the process of pur^chasing the property that we currently own, we were told that this was going to be a development of single level, single family dwellings. Not until probably one to two days before closing did I contact M1^. Forrey and he advised me that it was going to be an apartment complex. I've got sever^al concerns, one is, is that I have spoke with Jeff Huber he does want to purchase a portion of our proper^ty to make an existing road down through, you know to access his apartments. We have not come to any conclusion of that and I've not made any decision. I'm not sure I want a roadway running adjacent to our property. I'm concerned that as you look at your drawing, the portion I've highlighted, that then^e be a proper screen, hopefully a block wall of at least six foot. The thought of putting some speed bumps to slow down the traffic a little bit. Jeff Huber again has advised us that the car^ports were going to be on the outer surrounding area of that project which I guess is okay. I feel that the density is extremely high. We have a ditch and I'm asking that that be tiled. I do have concerns about the project. I did ask for a conceptual drawing and I have not receive that. Giesler: Whet^e is this ditch located that your concerned about hawing tiled? • MER I D I Ah! C I TY COUIVC I L MAY 18, 1993 PAGE 17 Barrett: It's located right along this property line. Actually it's running along this property line - shown on map. Giesler^: It's not on your property, it's on theirs? Aar^rett : I' m not sure. Kingsfor^d: We do have a requir^ement in the City that all ditches be tiled, so it is an Ordinance we would deal with. How many acres i s your pr^opert y? Parrett : 3 acres. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? .Leff Huber: I have met with Mrs. Barrett and I have assured her that we would do proper screening around the entire project as well as take same extra care around where her house adjoins the property. Her^ house is rather large and her garage actually sits closest to our project and I think that there isn't going to be any more noise cr^eated from our project than is on Meridian Road. We are more than willing to the the ditches and work with Mrs. Barrett in any way we can to alleviate any concerns she has. The garages that will be on our project will be solid garages facing the outside and where we have an open parking area then^e will be a six foot fence between there. Cowie: How far along are you on the West Ridge Apartments? Huber: Their about 40% complete right now. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Becky Bowcutt: Briggs Engineering, 1111 S. Orchard, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Bowcutt: I'm her^e on behalf of the developers to the south. As you know this has been an on-going thing concerning James Court, which is currently pr^ivate road and future access to the interior of this section. One of your main concerns is that access be provided to that interior because they don't have adequate access except for some linkage up to Blue Heron Lane, which is als^ private. I have provided a new drawing for Mr. Angel and Mr. Huber^. The one that was discussed at a previous Council Meeting • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 18, 1993 RAGE 18 showed a little curvature to the road to give it a non-continuous Collector type look which ACRD prefers. But after discussing it with them, they were concerned about the width an their parcel and asked us to bear a little additional right of way, so we did revise our plan. We did not loose ,any units, we just went straight out and are bearing 3Q1 feet. I talked with Mr. Sale at ACRD this morning he said b0 feet of right of way will be sufficient to provide a Collector for that inter^i or. Basically I know there are probably some concerns about the density of this project to the north, however one thing that you need to take into consideration is the over^all density far that particular vicinity. What you've got there with the James Court Apartments is approximately 58 units, they are on 5.834 acres. Then what we are proposing to the south of this pr^ojeet is 72 units on 5.89 acres and then they have, according to ACRD it's 7. 4. If yo~.- take the units that they ar^e pr^oposing, the units that we are proposing to the south, the existing units of James Court, your density is around 16 units to the acre. One reason is, like our particular development is only going to be it^.c~ dwelling units per acre because we've had to decrease it due to the necessary r^ight of way for the Collector. When-you take a look at that and look at that vicinity, the ~5 units per acre density that they are proposing, in reality would not tr^anslate into that if you look at the adjacent parcels with the similar type development either proposed or existing. We'd like you to basically consider the application and vote to approve it. We think that this particular area will benefit because that will translate into that Collector being built. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Craig Rhom, 330 Cranmer, was savor^n by the attorney. Rhom: When does the public get to see the draft? How can we get our hands on it to look at before a bunch of leg work is done and approved so we can voice our opposition to it. Kingsford: It's a concept drawing so far they are not .completed so certainly they are not tied to that. As soon as those things have been submitted to us they will be available her^e at City Hall. Rhom: Is there a certain time after this hearing that it will be available? .~ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 18, 1993 PAGE 19 Kingsfoi^d: It's just an annexation and zoning request at this point. As soon as they get ready to do their project there then we'd have those available. Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Gt^eg Bond, ~c'8 Ct^anmer Drive, was sworn • by the attorney. Bond: We do have some concerns being in the other subdivision across the way, about traffic on Meridian Road. We would like to see as little density along that road as possible. Concerns stated about values of homes being decreased and additional traffic. Kingsford: Anyone else? No response. I will close the public hearing. Counselor is there a difference in the testimony? Crookston: Thet^e are not but there might be some changes that we need to make on the Conclusions and the requirements that pertain to the garages and the screening. The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Corrie to have the attorney review and prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on this request for annexation and zoning. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #6: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEkATION AND ZONING TO R-8 WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT, PHEASANT POINTE SUBDIVISION: Kingsford: At this time I'll open the Public Hearing and invite the owner or representative to begin. Jim Merkle, Hubble Engineering, was sworn by the attorney. Merkle: This annexation application and preliminary plat application is proposed for the southwest corner of Locust Grove. Locust Grove on the east and Ustick on the north. To the south of us is the T1^act Subdivision. We are contiguous with the City corporate limits along this piece of property which is known as the Borup parcel tshown on map). We are proposing R-8 zoning for the entire 44 acres. That is consistent with the existing zoning of the Tract Subdivision to the south and additional subdivisions on the east side of Locust Grove in this area. This proposed subdivision contains 9~ single family residential lots on approximately 27 ll2 acres which gives you a density of MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING MAY 11, 1993 PAGE 3 The Motion was made by Hepper and seconded by Shearer^ that the Mer^idian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Roll Call Vat e: Hepper^ - Yea; Rountr^ee - Yea; Shearer - Yea; Al id.jani - Yea; Motion Carried: All Yea: The Motion was made by Hepper and seconded by Shearer that the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning requested by the applicant, for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and that the applicants be specifically required to the all ditches, canals and water^ways as a condition of annexation, and that the applicants meet all the Ordinances of the City of Meridian specifically including the development time requirements. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #5: FINDINGS DF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS DF LAW: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST HY HIMERICH AND DORADO DEVELOPMENT: Johnson: Any discussion? No response. The Motian was made by Rountree and seconded by Shearer^ that the Meridian F~lanning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and appr^oves these Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law. Roll Call Vote: Hepper - Yea; Rountree - Yea; Shear^er - Yea; Al id.jani - Yea; Motion Car^ried: All Yea: The Motion was made by Rountree and seconded by Shearer that the Met^idian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning requested by the applicant for the party described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law in compliance with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Motion Carried: All Yea: ~ ~ • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 13, 1993 PAGE 6 Hepper: Is there any landscaping or anything like that proposed? Loveless: Not with the subdivision. Hepper: Over by the main school it shows a pretty large parking area, will that parking be included in there? Loveless: We drew that up to show that we can provide enough space on that site to provide a parking lot for the square footage that exists within that building. Johnson: Do you have any concept regarding the ultimate use of the lots? The application states combination of use. Loveless: We anticipate under the R-15 zone probably a potential multi-family development or some sort. We have no plans for one at this stage now. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Bill Brewer, 105 E. Carlton Ave., was sworn by the attorney. Brewer: As many of you know our property consists of a mortuary across the street. We've been at that location since 1957 and I go have an on going interest in what occurs with the school property over there. In watching and keeping up with the property I still cannot help but believe that the greatest potential for that property would be that it remain in one piece. A nice large piece of property that could truly be usable for something down the road. (Further explanation - see tape) Johnson: Anyone else? No response. I will close the Public Hearing. (Discussion Held - see tape) The Motion was made by Hepper to approve the preliminary plat - motion died for lack of 2nd. To be scheduled for next Planning and Zoning Meeting. ITEM #6: PUBLIC HEARING: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST BY HIMERICH & DORADO DEVELOPMENT: Johnson: I will open the Public Hearing. Is there someone representing the applicant? • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING APRIL 13, 1993 PAGE 7 Jeff Huber, 1109 Leadville Ave., Boise, representin g Dorado Development, was sworn by the attorney. Huber: We have an application before you tonight to annex and rezone some property on Meridian Road. We're not asking for specific approval tonight. There was some confusion in the staff report as to the site plan fitting the property. It's a conceptual plan that we added to our application to show the City what we had in mind for that particular piece of property. Another item in Mr. Smith's comments in your staff report referred to the annexation of the house parcel on the property. This is an oversight on our part and we'd be more than happy to add that to the annexation prior to the City Council Hearing. We envisions a lot of growth in Meridian occurring over the next few years and we envision a need for multi-family housing. We'd like to build a project here that Meridian would be proud of. (Presented pictures to Commission Members) We're requesting that we receive a zoning designation of R-40 with a restrictive covenant for 25 units per acre instead of 40 per acre. In order for use to build a quality project like this with all these amenities, we plan to have a basketball court, a volleyball court, a swimming pool, and playgrounds for children (Explained further - see tape) -In order for us to build a quality project like this we need a higher density than the R-15 would allow and we don't need the density that an R-40 would allow. So we are requesting that the developer enter into a development agreement with the City that we would be restricted to a maximum of 25 units per acre. Johnson: On this conceptual, it looks almost identical to the N. Five Mile. Huber: It is. It's the very same plan that we are using over there. We are working with the Ada County Highway District regarding the Collector Street now and the adjoining property owners. Ultimately I think the decision will be up to the Ada County Commission's. If we cannot locate a Collector there we would access this project off of Meridian Road. Are there any questions? Hepper: Is this the concept of what you have in mind out there or is this actually what you plan on doing? Huber: This is actually what we would plan on doing but at this present time we're not asking for conditional use approval. We are sharing with you a concept of what we want to build there. • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING APRIL 13, 1993 PAGE 8 Hepper: How many units would be involved? Huber: At 25 per acre, we would be in the neighborhood of 175 units. Hepper: Would you build to that density to the 25 per acre? Huber: Once the Collector issue is settled we would have to lay it out and I don't think that we quite get to that density. Hepper: Would you do this in phases or all at one time? Huber: I think I'd have to defer that question to Dorado Development for that. I think we might phase it depending on the demand, in two phases maximum. Hepper: Do you have an idea on the time frame of those phases? Huber: Mr. Angel from Dorado Development will address those issues. Johnson: Any other questions for Mr. Huber? To clarify your earlier comment then, your agreeable to some sort of restriction imposed by the City to the 25 density or less per acre. Huber: Yes. Johnson: Anyone else from the public? Robert R. Angel, 35 Horizon Drive, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Angel: There were a couple of questions with regard to the phasing or the density that maybe I could answer. Our company came to Meridian a little bit over a year and a half ago and constructed what we call the Cherry Lane Apartments. We felt that the one thing that maybe would be lacking would be a top flight apartment project with amenities. We are also aware of the fact that it is a small market, the multi family market is very strong as everybody knows all over the Treasure Valley. For a project in this size we had contemplated doing it in two phases. We would go ahead and put in all our improvements. The first phase not less than 75 to 80 units. The second phase would be the balance of the property. In terms of timeliness, I would say not later than spring of 1994 to begin construction. Any questions? • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION .APRIL 13, 1993 PAGE 9 Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? • Raleigh Hawe, 530 Blue Heron Lane, was sworn by the attorney. Hawe: I own the property to the east of this development and I have no adverse comments about the designs that are being proposed. However I am interested in the proposed Collector that is an east west Collector on the south side of this particular property. As 1 have testified in the meetings prior to this on the properties to the south of there conceptual project here I find it a necessity to have a Collector through that area to serve the properties to the east and to connect to the streets adjoining my easterly boundaries of my property. With the numbers of people that are in this particular area and are proposed to be in this area, a Collector for the services that are required for this particular project and the ones adjacent to it including these properties to the east for fire services, emergency services and traffic movement, the Collector area should be a required situation in that particular area. That Collector will serve the Willowbrook Street and I believe it's now called Blue Heron Street on the east side of the properties that I have. This service of course will involve not only the general services of emergency, the fire, police, etc. but it will serve the traffic movement to Meridian Road. Are, there any questions? Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Larry Sale, 319 E. 37th Street, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Sale: I'm the development .services supervisor for the Ada County Highway District. In our review of this application and the review of the previous application by Bridgewood Subdivision, which is just immediately east of this parcel the Highway District imposed a condition for the preparation of the traffic study between these two properties and the dedication of a Collector standard street from Meridian Road to the East boundary of these properties. On behalf of the Commission, I urge your inclusions of our recommendations in your Findings and pass those on to the City Council for their consideration. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? No response. I will close the Public Hearing. The Motion was made by Johnson and seconded by Alidjani to have the attorney prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Motion Carried: All Yea: ~UB OF TREASURE VALLEY • OFFICIALS AGOOCI PIaCe t0 L1Ve COUNCIL MEMBERS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA oBERT D ICORRIE GARY D. SM TH, P.EYCity Eng Weer . WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief " MERIDIAN, IDAHO $3642 Planner 8 zoning Administrator GORDON, Police Chief W.L. "BILL JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.,Attorney Phone (2O8) 888433 • FAX (208) 887813 Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. K[NGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, may we have your answer by: April 12 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/30/94 HEARING DATE: 4/19/94 REQUEST: Variance Request BY: Mike and Cynthia Sciscoe LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: 2210 N Meridian Road, portion of Lots 3 ~ 4 of J.E. Pfost's Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: • • CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E. IDAHO AVE.. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 VARIANCE APPLICATION /~ (RE: Meridian Zoning Ordinance). NAME : !~~ l,Lt' f. ~j~' SCl SLD~ FHONE (Owner or h lder of valid option) ADDRESS : ~a~a N. I~~r/L~~A~ ~OGct~ ~ GENERAL LOCATION: Parf~n O~(1/15 3 f ~ G-f c~~ ~~~ ~(~/~JI~~D,,~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: SPP ~ ~~Y' PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR VALID OPTION: A copy of your property deed or option agreement must be attached. _ PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION ~ ~ (r~cUesf~d VICINITY SKETCH: A vicinity map at a scale approved by the City showing property lines, streets existing.and proposed zoning and such other items as the City may require. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS: A list of all property owners and addresses within contiguoug to, directly across the street from, and within a 30O' radius of the parcel(s) proposed for a Variance must be attached. (This information is available from the County Assessor) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE: U~/'~'~~Ce f0 (,il'(Jv/ ~PS//~/-L~ .SIGNATURE: ~ ~ ` CITY COUNCIL RECORDS Date Received City Council Hearing Date Received By • • EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF TIfAT CERTAIN DEED OF TRUST DATED DECEI~SBER 7, .1993. PLEASE INITIAL A PORTION OK 400P PLATS ATOPAGE p470, RECORDSIOF ADAM COUNTY!NDAHOTDE CRiBED AS OF, FILED IN BO FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTION 6 AND 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE i EAST, AND SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, 801SE MERIDIAN, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREE 25' 30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 2141.22 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SECTION LINE AND ON THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH MERIDIAN, ROAD, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 34' 30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH STEEL PiN WITH A pLASTiC CAP ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID NORTH MERIDIAN ROAD, THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREE 25' 30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 42.15 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF NORTH MERIDIAN ROAD, SAID POINT BEING THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 43' 16" EAST A DISTANCE OF 135.02 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH STEEL PIN WITH A PLASTIC CAP, THENCE SOUTH ad DEGREE 53' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 131.03 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH STEEL PIN WITH A PLASTIC CAP, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 26' 27" WEST A DISTANCE OF 136.06 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH STEEL PIN WITH A PLASTIC CAP ON THE SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF NORTH MERIDIAN ROAD, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREE 25' 30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 135.00 FEET (SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED UNDER INRSGHLTMO WAYOOF NORTH MERIOOIAN BROAD 0 THE REAL POINT OF 33.00 FEET) ALONG SAID EASTERLY BEGINNING. .. ~ ~ ~ ML'R1D1/4 i I ~- BLUE HERON LANE _ ~ ~ -~ truww~n \ I ~~ *.~.. ~~,...«. ~ \ J.B. PFOST'S~• '""""' I / .,ate. ~ j ••~ I rn~r~n I •~ I ` m~w~w» j ~ •'. ~ \\ ~"' • SIIHDIVISION I „~ JhMtS' CT. CPriv~It¢~ 1, ~~ `I( ~. ~ 'Sx . \\ ~~~ ~s J ~ri~gEW~O~ ,I\ ~~ \ mirwr ~9Xp y (Pro f 05 GOB ~ ~\ '7~j, ~P \\ e»iwrw ~ nr~aMn • DRIB •\ •\ ~\ m Z m ~ r ~ Z W 2 2 I ~ n..a~., ` ~ r~lt , STREET ~'~~~ arayw e.nrrr x -~~, ~ ~; a w~ ~ ~ = mniur 1~ _' ~ ~ _ ~ _-- 1 ~ ~, 3. t OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney • UB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN • COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW 33 EAST IDAHO. g sHARI snLEs MERIDIAN, IDAH083642 ~~~~Y `P ~~cnmgAdministrator Phone 208 888-4433 • FAX{208) 887813 M JOHNSON ( ) Chairman • Planning & Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 APR ' '~ ~Sg/f GRANT P.KINGSFORD ClT'~ vsI' D~tt~iL~if~~l Mayor l• TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, may we have your answer by: April 12 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/30/94 HEARING DATE: 4119/94 REQUEST: Variance Request BY: Mike and Cynthia Sciscoe LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: 2210 N Meridian Road, portion of Lots 3 & 4 of J.E. Pfost's Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORR1E, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES , / / OTHER: y YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~~i iA,~ i 2~ ~ D ~'S NO .,.5 ~ Ir~~c~. /`• ~~ ~Ow~iS' {~~ S~ SCo ~ ORDINANCE NO.~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL .PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT TAE SECTION CORIJER COMMON TO SECTIONS 6 AND 7 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to amend and change the zoning from R-40, High Density Residential to C-C, Community Business, for the described parcel in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the aforementioned real property which is described as follows: Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 6 and 7 Township 3 North, Range 1 East, and Sections 1 and 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, thence North 00°25'30" West, 2141.22 feet to a point on the section line and on the center line of North Meridian Road, • thence North 89°34'30" East,-30.00 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of- Way of said North Meridian Road, thence South 00°25'30" East, 42.15 feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road, said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, thence South 89°43'16" East, 135.02 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, theme South 00°53'00" East, 131.03 feet to a 1/2 inch steed pin with a plastic cap, REZONE ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT Page 1 I `,~ • `~ thence South 00°53'00" West .174.15 feet more or less, thence South 88°06'58" West 132.13 feet more or less, to a 1/2 inch steel pin on said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road, thence North. 00°25'30" West, 177.15 feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 00°25'30" West, 135.00 feet along said Easterly Right-of -Way of North Meridian Road to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. be, and the same is rezoned from R-40 Residential to CC Community Business District, and Section 11-2-425, Official Zoning Maps is hereby amended to reflect the same. This rezoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for rezone. Section 2. The Applicant shall pave parking areas adjacent or near property, the design standards for off-street parking in 11-2 414 must be met, specifically including the fencing. Section 3. That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above conditions the property shall be subject to rezone back to R-40. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this day of , 1994. APPROVED: MAYOR -- GRANT P. KINGSFORD ATTEST: WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. -- CITY CLERK REZONE ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT Page 2 ~ a y i • • STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN TAE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH IS GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 6 AND 7 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE"; passed as Ordinance No. , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the day of , 1994, as the same appears in my office. DATED this day of STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) 1994. City Clerk, City of Meridian Ada County, Idaho On this day of , 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. SEAL Notary Public for Idaho Residing at Meridian, Idaho REZONE ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT Page 3 OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live • COUNCIL MEMBERS NALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk RIDIAN RECEI~IE~x YERRINGTON CORRIE oBERT D JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer Water Works Supt. STUART BRUCE D CITY OF ME . APR WALT W. MORROW 8 1994 SHARI STILES , . JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste water supt. 33 EAST IDAHO 1 planner b Zoning Administrator KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief f " MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ~~ t~`{,` t~ ~ ~ u ~y~ CI i 1 V, ~~~I~I~Jt~JOHNSON GORDON,Polioe Chie W.L."BILL WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-0433 • FAX (208) 887813 ~ p~((C1~irman • Planning 3 Zoning ~ Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-221 I ~ Q ~~ v l~J ~'D GRANT P. KINGSFORD c A ~D ~~~~ Mayor O [~ F'- R & MERIDIAN NAMPA TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVF~~~~RIOJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendationswill be considered by the Meridian City Council, may we have your answer by: A rii 12 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/30/94 HEARING DATE: 4119/94 REQUEST: Variance Request BY: Mike and C nthia Sciscoe LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: 2210 N Meridian Road, portion of Lots 3 ~ 4 of J.E. Pfost's Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORR~IE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER OEPARTArENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT , ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPAMERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the variance request for Mike and Cynthia Sciscoe. CENTRAL •• DISTRICT HEALTH DErARTMENT KECEi`I~D REVIEW SHEET APR 1 8 t99~f CITY ~i~'. ~~~;i~llifJ Rezone # Conditional Use # Preliminary/Final/Short Plat _ V/h~.j/t`~ C-~ G~ ~- 3 t ~{ E o<STS .Sc/ d 1 S ~o~ Retum to: ^ Boise ^ Eagle ^ Garden city ~, Meridian ^ Kuna ^ Acz . ^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal. ^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewge disposal, we will require more data conceming the depth of ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: 2 feet ^ 4 feet ^ 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ^ Central sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water welt ^ Interim sewage ^ Central water ^ Individual sewage ^ Individual water ^ 8. n The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of HeaRh • and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: • ^ Central sewage ^ Community sewage system^ Community water ^ Sewage dry lines ^ Central water ^ 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probelm. ^ 10. This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined rf other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any: ^ Food establishment ^ Swimming pools or spas ^ Child Care Center ^ Beverage establishment ^ Grocery store 13: •~C-S ~ y ~7~GC="-' /ll U,S~ ~~ ~ON/~~-~7~ DATE: ~o ~~~~~~ S~~"Wff-C~ ~/sporg•~ Reviewed by: ~~ S~S ~~ ~2 ~~/'~--~E~~~- ~~ CDHD 10-91 rcb / /~-~,4-//~L~- . 04-05-1994 01~24PM FROM CPML TO 887481332 P.01 ~ s • DORADO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (208) 344-b511 P.O. Box 2666 Fax {2081 345-fs321 ~ Boise, Idaho &3701 Aprijl 5, 1994 Ms. Shari Stiles Ci:ty~ of Meridian 33 E:. Idaho St. Meri~di8n, SD 83642 Post it° Fax Note 767.1 ~~ ~ ^C~ ' !~' p °ages- Tp F i Pho Phone a~ ~- Fax # ~? ~, Q~~ Fex M F$x: $87'48I3 ' RE : ~tezone Request Dear Shari, Larry D. Stevens anti I, as l.ndividuals, are the current owners of the x.55 acre piece q£ property located on the northeast corner of North Meridian Raad~and James Court, aka "Parcel III". We recently purchased t'~his land from the entity of Dorado Development Company,: of which Mr. Stevens and Z are sale owners. At one point in time, Dorado Development Company owned the .42 acre's with residence;, now owned by Mr. Michael Sciscoa, ska "Parcel II", the .55~ acres, now owned by us, and the b.45 acre paro!el 1oGated to tixe east of the sciscoe's property, aka "Parcel I", :which is still ob~med by Dorado Development Company. It i~ our intention to request from th® City of Meridian a rezone on t1°ie .55 acres from R-40 to CC, allowfng us to construct an office building on the property. Ae such, we formally ask that this letter serve as our official request to th® City for this zoni~ig change. . I ampenclosing a legal description of Parcel ITI, the .S5 acres in question. Please contact xte at your earliest convenience should you have any further questions. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely yours, R t An ell Preside RRA J1nh SHARi.REZ Enc~.r~sure TOTAL P.01 ~miuzn Amount : $ 45 . pp S C I3 E D II L E- A TO 887481332 P.01 LJ Order No.: ST-9203'7425 PW Policy No.: 0-9993-67305 Date of Policy: JUNE 2~5, 1993 at 4;53 p.m. Amount~oE Insurance: $ 10,0OO.Oq 04-05-1994 01~43PM FROM CPML • 1• Name of Insured: Rd;BERT R. ANGELL AND LARRY D. STEVSNS 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this Policy is: F'Fi~E SIMPLE 3. Theiestate or interest r~ferrEd to herein is at the date of policy vested ia: RCIBERT R. ~1NGELL,, a married znan, and LARRY D. STEVENS, a married main 4. The;].aad referred to iu this Policy is situate ia:State of IDAHO, County of ADA: PARCEL III Ct~NlNlENC2NG at thesection corner common to Sections 6 and 7, Te~wnship 3 North, Range 1 Bast, and Sections 1 and 12, Township 3 NOxt3a, Range 1 West , Boise Merid~.dn thence North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 2141,22 feet to a:point on the ', section line and on the Centex line of forth Meridian Rand, thence North 89 degrees 34'30" East, 30.00 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly fight-of-Way of said North Meridian Road, thence North 88 degrees 43'49" East, 328.22 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin~with a plastic cap, thence Ne~rth 83 degrees 49`27" East, 129.3.8 feet to a L/2 inch stee]. pin .with a p1d.St1.G cap, thence North 88 degrees 48`37" Bast, 389.26 feet to a 3./2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 33. degrees 03'37^ Sast, 414.88 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pig with a plastic cap, thence South 88 degrees 34'59" West, 1057:50 feet to a.1/2 inch Post-it 'Fax Note 7B7i 8~ ~4-05-1994 01~44PM FROM CPML -.';°; ~ ` u • TO 887481332 P.82 • S98.yo' i I i TOTAL P.92 I va ~. ~~ • • P01 1 ~ ~ March 4, 1994 To Whom it May Concern: We are in agreement with changing our rezone request from C-G tP ~-C. ~ ' .~~ -Ga tnrZ. MYCh 1 and Cynthia Sciscoe MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: April 5. 1994 APPLICANT: Dorado Develoament and AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 1 Mike and Cynthia Sciscoe REQUEST: Rezone Request AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: LETTER FROM MIKE AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE ` • March 29, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: It is agreeable with us to change our zoning request from a C-G to a C-N. ,~ Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe • • DORADO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (208) 344-651 1 P.O. Box 2666 Fax (208- 345-6321 Boise, Idaho 83701 April 5, 1994 Ms. Shari Stiles City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho St. Meridian, ID 83642 Fax: 887-4813 RE: Rezone Request Dear Share, Larry D. Stevens and I, as individuals, are the current owners of the .55 acre piece of property located on the northeast corner of North Meridian Road and James Court, aka "Parcel III". We recently purchased this land from the entity of Dorado Development Company, of which Mr. Stevens and I are sole owners. At one point in time, Dorado Development Company owned the .42 acres with residence, now owned by Mr. Michael Sciscoe, aka "Parcel II", the .55 acres, now owned by us, and the 6.45 acre parcel located to the east of the Sciscoe's property, aka "Parcel I", which is still owned by Dorado Development Company. It is our intention to request from tho City of Meridian a rezone on the .55 acres from R-40 to CC, allowing us to construct an office building on the property. As such, we formally ask that this letter serve as our official request to the City for this zoning change. I am enclosing a legal description of Parcel III, the .55 acres in question. Please contact m:~ at ycu~- Earliest convenience should you have any further questions. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely yours, R t An ell Preside RRA/mh SHARI.REZ Enclosure CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E. IDAHO AVE. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 VARIANCE APPLICATION (RE: Meridian Zoning Ordinance) NAME : ~l',Cf f. l,~ ~!~ JCI ~ (Owner or h lder of valid option) F~HONE ADDRESS : Baia N. I~t~~/Lr~G~n ~OGd- GENERAL LOCATION : ~prt~n Q~~S 3 f y Ot' ~~ ~$~S ~bQrl U/~/D~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY : SPP (~- ~C/1 PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR VALID OPTION: A copy of your property deed or option agreement must be attached. PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION ~'~~ ~~~ esl~d VICINITY SKETCH: A vicinity map at a scale approved by the City showing property lines, streets existing and proposed zoning and such other items as the City may require. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS: A list of all property owners and addresses within contiguoug to, directly across the street from, and within a 300' radius of the parcel(s). proposed for a Variance must be attached. (This information is available from the County Assessor) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE : (~(% ~~ G'/~P ff) ~ ~1l')i~~ / ~Ji (y~/i~~ SIGNATURE : ~~ CITY COUNCIL RECORDS Date Received City Council Hearing Date Received By ~ ~ IBIT "A" ATTACKED HERETU AIiD BADE A PART HEREOF THAT CERTAIN DEED OF TRUST DATED EXfl DEC~+IBER 7, 1993. PLEASE INITIAL -~- RT{ON OF LOTS 3 AND 4 OF J.E. P1=05T'S SUBDIVISI pA COUNTY`NDA OTDE C BED AS OF, APO FILED IN BOOK 4 OF PLATS AT PAGE 147, RECORDS OF FOLLOWS: GAT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTION WESD, BO SE MERIDIAN~RTH, RANGE COMMENCiN 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANG TH 00 DEGREE 25' 30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 2141.22 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SECTION THENCE NOR LINE AND ON THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH MERIDIAN, ROAD, MERIDIAN ROAD, RTH 89 DEGREES 34' 30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30O0RTH ~ TO A 1 /2 INCH STEEL PIN WITH THENCE NO A PLASTIC CAP ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID N Imo, OF BEGINNING, H 00 DEGREE 25' 30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 42.15 PO ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF THENCE SOUT WAY OF NORTH MERIDIAN ROAD, SAID POINT BEING THE REA 89 DEGREES 43' 18" EAST A DISTANCE OF 135.02 FEET TO A 1 /21NCH STEEL PIN WITH THENCE SOUTH TH 00 DEGREE 53' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 131.03 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH STEEL PIN WIT A PLASTIC CAP, THENCE SOU A PLASTIC CAP, SOUTH 89 DEGREES 26' 27" WEST A DISTANCE WAY OF NOR H MERIDIAN ROAD EEL Pt THENCE WITH A PLASTIC CAP ON THE SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF K F OF SURVEYS AT PAGE 624, AS 133.00 ORTH 00 DEGREE 25' 30" WEST A DISTANCE ON BO00 FEET (SHOWN ON RECORD OF THENCE N SURVEY RECORDED UNDER INSTRUMENT N0.8426809 I AID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF NORTH MERIDIAN ROAD TO THE REAL POINT OF FEET) ALONG S BEGINNING. ~. HERON LANE IAiMIM11 It11MIMl1 ~}NMNlM J.B. PFOST~S / ~.»~. nuw~- rn~~ ~ ~~ ~^~-- ~ U1t1~.7C_A`~rl cal/) m~wTM SIIHDIVISION J h M t 5~ C~: C f r i V 1Vte~ ~1( e~ , x ~ ~Sx ' ~c k /oar, tis ]~r~dgewoo~ \ "`''e .So (Pro ~o5eo~ ~ m~ww 4x C' y~'~pC ~'~P ~n~~rw ~ nwiww nwuwa M~~~ ~N R~z~HE ~ fIrMM~ \\ .\ ~,`. ~~~ .\\ nr.~w ~ ~. V • R O .~ `\. \\ \\ ~'~ ~~~ ~~ . SRI` < m < Z m ~~~ r ~ W fIM17/IM fl~lM Z `~ .\ ~ I I ~ ` r~~E . StRffT arur~~ _ `. ` ~ ~~ x ~ - ' -, i = t1~,NN~ t a u' 7 '_ ~ l i ~-• W ~~~- r A A • • PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET Ted and Wanda Hepper 43 East Fairview Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 James Court Associates 760 W. Myrtle St. Boise, ID 83702 Bedelco, Inc. 5204 Sorrento Circle Boise, ID 83704 Bews & Smith 5204 Sorrento Circle Boise, ID 83704 Jack E. and Doris F. Barrett 2250 N. Meridian Road Meridian, ID 83642 James Banducci, Jr. 2116 N. Cole Road Boise, ID 83704 • March 29, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: l J It is agreeable with us to change our zoning request from a C-G to a C-N. Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MARCH 1. 1994 APPLICANT: DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 70 MICHAEL AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE REQUEST: REZONE REQEUST A EN Y COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY EINGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CITY POLICE DEPT: "REVIEWED" CITY FIRE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer CITY OF MERID RONALD R. TOLSMA MAXYERRINGTON GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer IAN ROBERT D. CORRIE BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WALT W. MORROW JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. 33 EAST IDAHO WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP KENNY W. BOW ERS, Fire Chief " " MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 Planner & Zoning Administrator W.L. BILL GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. GROOKSTON, JR., Attorney , Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON Chairman • Planning & Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor MEMORANDUM To: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor and City Council From: Wayne S . Forrey, Planning Director Date: January 6, 1994 RE: REZONE REQUEST OF MIKE AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE AND DORADO DEVELOPMENT FROM R-40 TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG) At the December 14, 1993 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, Commissioners expressed concern about additional CG zoning along North Meridian Road. The suggestion was made to explore a less intensive commercial neighborhood (CN) designation rather than CG zoning with the applicant. The Commissioners then tabled this rezone request to allow Mr. Sciscoe to meet with the City Staff and evaluate the merits of Commercial Neighborhood zoning at this location. During the past three weeks I have been meeting with Mr. and Mrs. Sciscoe to review the Commissioners request. Mr. Sciscoe has considered the merits of Commercial Neighborhood zoning and his family's business plans. Mr. Sciscoe agreed with the Commissioners that the CN designation will blend with the neighborhood better and still allow his business to be developed. Mr. and Mrs. Sciscoe are very sensitive to good development in this area. They are committed to being a ;good neighbor and likewise they want compatible development"~a.s..t to their property. They believe that CN zoning will provide adequate safeguards for quality development in their neighborhood. Based on my review of our Ordinance and meetings with the Sciscoe's, I believe that their businesses can be developed within the CN zone and benefit the neighborhood. I recommend that the CN be approved rather than the CG zone as requested in their initial combined Sciscoe/Dorado rezone application. Because the CN zone is less intensive of a land use, I don't believe that a new public hearing or an amended application is necessary to facilitate this change. • UB OF TREASURE VALLEY • OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer Memorandum A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor To: Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council From: Wavne S. Forney, AICP - Date• November 5 1993 Planning Director COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI . , Regarding :Request for Zone Change from R-44 to General Retail & Service Commercial (C-G) by Dorado Development plus Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe. Zone change and land use request of C-G complies with the current and'proposed Comprehensive Plan. This site is within the Mixed Planned Use Development Land Use designation as described in the proposed Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Comprehensive Plan indicates a need for service commercial facilities in this area. All public services are available or within reasonable service.areas for extension. This request is for zone change only:' This property is a small portion of a larger parcel that was recently annexed as R-40 to allow an apartment complex. As the site improvement plans are prepared and submitted, _City staff' will review and approve any site designs to achieve a high quality project as called for in the Comprehensive Plan and in neighborhood meetings. .. • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY r~- , • . - .. OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live ~ ~- ~~~• ~ _ ~- •! ~~ WAYNES.FORREY.AICP,CityClerk CITY OF MERIDI ~,~ IlM JANICEGASS.7reasurer ~~' ~ ~ ~" - BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO ~ • - -• ~- ° • - ° - - JOHN sHAwcaoFr, waste Water supt. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chie( BILL GORDON. Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSM, ROBERT GIESLEA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning 6 Plan JiM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinate PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your co ments and recommendations will be ~ considered by the Me1-id ian ~ ~~,,r~; s may we have your answer by: q TRANSMITTAL DATE: ~-4{~Ej Q,{- ~~_ ~gqc~ HEr~RING DATE: ~~e>~-.~r 9 )gg3 . REQUEST : ~ ZOy1 i'if` , ~ C T1- 4~ "'}'~ • C C .pw,,,,EI I 1. C G~ eY: ~rC•ca e;[ 1 i 'g 5 . n oe LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT 22 1 ~ ~'l~ . 1~P,tr•~ pan ~d ~D t'~ 0~ l~Pfir i ~ ,~ to 1'1~P.r`~ C~1 i a rL ~~ JIM JOHNSON P/Z MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI,P11 MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND fINAI PLATS) JIM SHEARER, P/l. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DI5IRICT CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z AOA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT 808 CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER C0~(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BOB GIESLER, C/C ~5 WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) MAX~YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT, BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECT R CITY FILES /~~ ~~~ r O OTHER; FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~J~e~;~:,~~~~ ,(~t~'s POLICE DEPARTMENT _ ,,(/ ~;, -f f7iau~ ~ a, ~ ~~~~ ,~ ~~~ f-~ CITY ATTORNEY f ti ~ 5- ~~~ c?itJ ,~ o ~.>~ La ~ Nf ~ ~"~:.1 ~ GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER ~iCrN; fu~•~c /3~-(s~~,~~ s~ ,' LL !V -tiLe,% ~ ~ WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER yt~.~z ~- /~ L L ~ O,~ ~ l=yc-~{~;s *N P~ ~ i S%~l~F, /2 Q ~~ • ~PERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS __ _ _ -- Bob L. Haley ~0`t EXCE~`~ _~ ~ DEP Dan Mabe, Flinan eD& Administration ~' DIRECTORS ~~~-~~~ e+ Sheryl Belknap, Elementary Jim Carberry, Secondary Christine Donnell, Personnel Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET • MERIDIAN,IDAH083842 • PHONE(208)888-8701 November 2, 1993 City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Dorado Development Co. Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Dorado Development Co. This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is beyond capacity. The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a need for additional school construction. We ask your support for a development fee statute on new home construction or a real estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we ask that additional residential development be denied. Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school as it may be necessary to bus students to available classrooms across the district. We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike paths and safe pedestrian access. Sincerely, ~aX/~ an Mabe, Deputy Superintendent DM:gr I m m m - . o +ri ^~ m .] a .. -O - - : a ry a~ u"i u fem. /~ m Y'J m W - V' I S O- J'J I!'I [y G - -O T I G ..]. s a- c~ U i~ m m lil u. _ m ..r N ~ _ ~ i [u f+~ u r .m0 L` Pl T ~] m ~ N ... .... u -. ~ -. .x z ~ c.] ~,> W L r r- W L [1] ti W S [n r W T In m C~ [^. fn h m O [~ Y~- u') Y7 m [~ nJ v r c-- •0 1 m r°+'i `o IF] a nJ •u fl 1 1 1 ~ ~ a- i ~~ ~ :. fu r [~ m o - vS: h in-o u-J e~ : !>arln _. ._. I i [ I s I '. J [T :J fL m ~ O• •~ O d m ti nl [u Vl ~O x J O -+ d ti d -. P~ h L m Y7 } IIT O h. s0 ~ -[] d -O Y7 x n m In 1I'] .O f.] [v d Y^ u'> ¢ f W 1>. ~ tt M ~< K >•t Jr4 iS M it I v k r< arf i G O •7 •.~.. O G O O O O O C u •'a O O ~~ ' GO O •O v~ 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G -+ s N T h ~ QS to r. In t~ -O lr -A Y'] x Y7 1r> N ') (.f fL N li> Y7 O - v> O O G O •~ •O G O~~~ O m 0 Y7 ^.. -. In =] m h~ m ru = a m x~ In m m o ... .eh m =. o. 'moo--.a m[r G i x c1I F *i m T m O d~ h N m W ~ I m I m N O• m x Rf ~+ m n -. ~. T N -O IT ~ N G ~ •O m m y b O` m P m y S [.] m O• P ~ ! U ti m V• 1J9 h G~ x D~ h N ~• O nJ .~ I+] n .- .O m O G [~ P m T m N .O N d P G C . i ~ P F ^ .O m~ y h O• m O• m [>J .O In d T O_ 1 m o- .`~ ~ ~ i ~ i oG pr »r yr-•. -o ccJ ~.-.n m~ hram . oru ~ .c~oh r. a arnn nmv>cn In .o~ ' I v i x a+c at se J.e a.[ ~ s+l as I at x ae aJ~ x 1~ J O O G O O^ 0 0 0 •~ O O O O G S .W- S 4 fL ti rU [l.l N ry [L d N ti ti N N fY N N C7 ¢ arf at arl J[ K :ee a•f ~ K iK K aS ilf at Cn YZ- ~~ O, :] 0 0 G •O O O O O u 0 0 •? O 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 •G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aW- fy ~ i i I 1 rr d rr fJ ( ~~ i m w UT d ( 1 In d m[ In M [~ •O F O I fT m o m 0 w p- n [n .O-. p• m m P^ m ~ 1f> x In D m ~. I ~ I { ~ a d a d In n •.o •~ d b! o• [r m [u d- m c ~ s h va o• m :~ o- P m -. .la x IJi rJ- a Y '- 1 W m r N O~~ -A [- -O an d ~. -O . d j ILL (Tl r•• m ~ r [P .G.. m = -D ~O SI h = 1 ~ I i ¢ i ~ ~ W -. m m IJ-> m o fJ.l i IJ"> [n ~ rr I ~ ~ i fT: i> i 1~ _ .r ~- d ~. d -. In J" m O'~ i`y [u q• m [.i n O h m m C- -J C o m m O• x n -n [O v 1~ ~ _ I I J W T a-- w I.M']m l= Ia2A :, ,_ ~ ..rt JT K ._ ... yJ rf'J O 6 W li l O y [L t~ u'9 G -i• T nJ ~ [P1J m c1J S Y ~ V f.f I+ ' ~ w 1.. -. r!] T m r V II'> t.J IJ'i . tWA ~ _ W ^ P .•. m ^ -:Sa ^ y t U O• [O Jn O• = p O +® I I .iC If !t [O trJ fT h In : .•r ... In /V S •mi ai ~ 1 1 1 6 D i C> _ mmaN. yr ~J ,'.u lz-IJT ru-]rmo D T rn d x [~- x T ~ IA .!) Y7 L^ T r .L Y"J ¢ V :r .._ .v rc. ... _. m . i -` I 1 I t I I :o i n ' rn ,r .r f r rn r.. .a cv~ r>, ^~ .r yo a ~ -a G 2 - L In c~J mo •n a+mi G ~ e .- ... N t r Cn U f` i~iJJ u- -~ m r n = = m r° z iiJ w rr w [.> (~ •~ O 4 N m h ~ (.il m W W 7C N ti j 6 :> I .... nJ ._. nJ w fv -. r< O p ).: ~ r n P S ~O ~ A N C I~ h t.> x~ ' • !L r ~L A In TI A •- O .T ~J IIJ .T LJ V7 y> u] +J ~ riJ fL Y] y7 .s xz W s ~ z m ~> >i c' ~> ._J tL r rY: W J IY - T _ ..:n . .:~ o er .a_ -_ - ~. J .~.. . O I^-a - _ _ ia1 T r'. yi ~ .J - I, I ~ y - W 7 ~1t J _ )" T ~ ~~ rJ Q Z 1- ,. ~ _ _.. cv-> -' P u-a - +J Ud• W .ai ... c •u „ CJ w fL O L f^.J 2 rn m - r• m c . o• in o- aT: [~> [n V7 V fc w ~~ 1 IY i' m H- [.. en nJ m m A I W .x ~..~ 2 ::.1 Y7 I]. f~f N It~> I I ~ n] n In t ~ m o 1 I I m ~ a• m r m - G i u J ~ m ~ J ~ ¢ 1 W =~ : O k >H raJ a- O O O C .1 O O O I m m I U I G -i] m -. m m ' h II'> 6 M.•r ~~- ,~ II m O 0 O m b . F r ~• c -O m I ~a c 6 11 m [1J ~ V7 6 ~ ~ ~ In G a ... ti m m a o IJJ~'J I~ Y7 Y7 ti lu m n d m Cl Y7 m d IA J o •O ~o e°J.mi ~ m d N x ~ Ye ~ = W O O O O [~J t•] l7> m 1>: ~ Jr N S O 0 0 1>c `a .a o 0 a o ~ s tD I N ~ 1 1 m I In 1 .V fn m Y-] R.f d ., a u~a I i ^ 11 ~ ~ 6 1 ~ i o m t O 0 Imn •O a m 0 = 11 m_ a I =: I •T ~ xanf V YJ O fi d IJ v 1 J _ m s W ¢ fu W x u ILL.. ~ a [u ~+ d _ ~ . [r .xi.J 1 IFf, J -~ .D ~ nJN W I 9t '~ O O G Y7 In O Q O x d O Y ti CV pJ RL .f! ~ N N N_ S ti ., I/'> If Y7 -. [-. en mr li .'Qo m O ~ I 4 .- - n in I • Y7 I I J '. N T ~ In F x x aw >K _. p .o I ID L ~ (O ' I LmC ? ~ ~J O 1 6 O 1 1 T [O I` 1 a N [~ 11 ± d `^ I YT m I %r. m ~ s m d d i h d m ~ m m r I f> J N -o x m e va [D se ti M T Y7 j v m IJ9 In I ~u .o~ I fY: O .- I W W ~ . I .l_ ~ I [h t+• P W m 111 I .W-. 1 [i] I o ~ 1 in ti'J .~ In i r'f N Y7 N I O S +~ ~ ~ j ~i c. 1 1 1 1 ~ IJ~> a [J. i c~-+m m 1 u J I V 1 0 .> m .> m :3 a~ i ~ ~ N ~ i Y~ ! d I n i m •~ in o fT h ~ N w n m rt a rT. .O d -+ i S N N ~• JD lY _ u ~ O ^] I =>Y..- i m [n [q 1~ m rp I fJ. i • C [ ~ ~ ~ ~ . J ~x`nJ aNU I Q c.> I ~ ' 1 ~ 1 d 1 Iv m i> w i ia- 1 1 t [~ I 1 II] .~J Q :> rL • J 1 ~ ~S u ti 1 `t ~ ~~ s u u O 11 Q 11 ° p ti ~~ - ii f li i.] a %a « .-. ~ ii .i . .a. ,J f 1 m y~ -. w i. ~ n - 1~ > r r ..) s o -. ? :r .-. . r. ... ... p : fu li x , p o p p LI ... " _ -. W I .^! J W 1~ J 11 11 ' ~... a~- •~ f I y Q Q T r _ W r 1 i3 ~ a J .1 W ~J. - •11 11 -' ,l- !L' r _ Z ~ I - I'Y •- YJ Z' 1 >t. rr I i. rJ J J Ir - '- .~ .~ .n m i m i> •! ni 1 P d i ~ 1 + I i 1 m a N 1~ 11 1 I N 1 p X 1 11 1 11 1 p I 11 1 p ! p I ~] M I p I N 4J I m -A 11 I P ~+ M aM i -• In p .r x A I ill 11 M 11 -. p +J •S p 4 ? O X O -• 1- n ~- n cn p p H G F P m o- •o d .i> ~_ u N G i ~. P m m n 4 O m v] O N 11'] i 0 ti M 1 o i y „ f p x p U 11 N 11 ~n n :i n 11 n>- r u u ii I 11 i. ~9. 11 a- 11 1!> Y7 m m m rlJ 0 Y7 [>l fi] .= G ~~ IIG- ['> f-3rrrt~ isrs •t: 3srr~ 3~i:t: ~r rr=nr.+rr_3i »s~ L-.t.sr »)~~# i »sx ~e:tr^3 a r~r #:3-ri ~ mr:ti»t~f'r, #'L-+r t9~tu i-3~,iri»Q. G~mtS~Sa ar~r3 3 sia~r_is:~•~~ri thra "s3r~»cif~t!-rrr^" i t ese~#: i L-+» s~)L~r~ i »-r!t°~tt-r F.i»r~ ix,t3-r f~3 #: t.s»C`L1>7)f'•,~rta. b3 ~ wi i`S'r i f ur>3~~~ i t wr,~ es:t+xL-.3 t.stta3 y »~•e~~~t9r^_y~. fii »c~ a-~ 3•rz,ww»Y t :~et_>» ss~;ir_ic:»r_t_ ~•~t' tfir C:~-,s)ss»cr>=ia3%»nr)-r^~:siris:s»tia3 ta33L~w~arn:.~ a~ y_+•s,t:t s,Fe•sd ~*r••e•s'r°r• ~~ 3~~s•r~ tt~,~#: ~-.~~r•t Lwtst t.s»3~~:=^ ~~}.+~L-,3~stra3y »f•1_"i:~_.i:'=~r"tY^}/. ~'~ ~L~.t! wt~tl3 r3 AfS)~Y7f3 _fi?t5 Y^ T.:`Y?Y^Y`fa=~'.¢C~»c3rns^t° '~C~ Y^L F.1Tj tt~sa 'R z•+ss>>~•t wrrYr3 z2r^rat:IY c~~~-.r^r=r_i2+tr=+ it. iJk= c!i r3 r:r.,ttar •~; 3~tat~ i i, wa:3 -, •t y3i;~ti #:3~~+•t: it wAS cji sa 3 3 L-+sn~ri c>» G-f~ -=:.~~cis5>=.~,33r.. MLi~L-~r it ~,rt~r,)#:r_vr:>» ~9~p3y •tL~ ~`•-3~. 3 •~up~~-:+•a~ wra) 3 3 •Fi »t3 i.:+ts'i: •tL.»star•rL-+w. 3"ssi d _yr_.u fi Y>f_'~ r:+»_,~ Ci tw ~~rrii »arx:~ L-+» i #:? 3'F •~r.= v,+rz) rj SSUY^~3y 3 i 3t,~ tL1 •~ra+r i t: L'+r~f~-.r^rahArx3. LJ C.~IY= :k Z• ) =i :t S))~llr^•~•t°t»~ tL1 L5 ?3t '~~cl ~. ti+'t1 l3 R3 5t1 T)'l.~ t.S4 E1 t:t?~Y ~~ yL.tsr 4t•t~tr~ss)rs»#: r'~~sas~., 73-si•a wi 3 3 ,7t.sst: t:»•~ur^~ that t3~s~r~ wt>»-t: i~~_> ~.ir,y uh:,rt~: s~)isu»t3~r^st~a»rii»g~, t,~~33,s m~-~wi~~s ~Y»_~+wti_y, fiir3t)•G -3~l-s~~».k _a s,~t.tic!•) •t=~-. r' `~~'Lti1.5Y` tr^Nn)t~»t_~i.tsy n•~~.i~'t:ar-,cam i» 'tl~i~ A)at'Et•?~r•.. 3~is~~'y ~fPY•CI'r .~ ~~ 2'.~~~J rt F r^L-,ns : 3~f i ch Fse 3 f=•r i •st: Lam' 3'iiw~s ~r'L-+~,erf:_y 3;,tizc•»ss l~sar.~uessi: r3ritred 3k.:~venr~er, '~~ 295:.. f L~ s Mfr. i+d,~s_y»fa FL-,rr^ry~ i-f;a. f;3-rar^i 9t. i 3 e:4f l~fr~s»i~tr's L~f user F~t+ar si s ~1e~ar^ 8i re zti»ii ~ft_3s gas»s Ws.=.> ,:~r^ i r~ i »Fn 3 3 Y• its ias,si i- t t'r~ a r'e.~,~+»~• Y'r_•~t•SLSe~.,t a»~ ,c,LSr ~rL-.i:~er't Y ~e C:-{.+ t: L, r»ai-.3e ~~ur Y`nnSi 3 y tc+ ru» a ~7L'tiflBE'+ bu~i »tas's, L1utr t:t~ sw3-s~-t wss- lat~iieue tr, ~+e nsi~3LSr>c9~r~•S:a»cJ»sgs rr»r_t>u»ttisreris it 3~sae ta>ee» >•s~,~e•~=,ciry. tt+ sweet wi t!s 3+3eri ci i a» ~ 3 ~i»»i »ss a»d ?c+»i nit Re+r>r3 e,LSbmit. •tf~i:~a ]tri:te~r •L-•L~, ~L-,u, Tie fc,13~e+wi»~~ r.•ut3~ i»r:~ t•fst~ a~rteense»t Y'eF+~S~ser~ ~tsroe_~» s»yse3 fs f~fr, f=L~rr^eyY S~Ss. ~ti3erst tirss3 3«4 r, 3•L-+s» ftSt_+»t>•r_+it {e+ttor^»s~p fL-+r Ilc.r•t.~d,~+ Dervs~3,_+t~esrs> L,» 3~Sesrr_ts ss•t 299=s•s ~3~r nsz, i» rsa~•~eL-+n:_, fx+r~ »Lnt drr•~i ri »~ t,.+ ti i v i s3r:~ t 3x pr^ot~rr^t_yi i n r~t.se¢.t iL-+» i»t,:~ t~wL-, sertsF~>•F.-t t? 3,~+•t ~ Fig FsrL~s.+r>sc~d i» tf~t+ ~•rirt~ s ,a»t:3 F i»,•:3ir_+~y a•:_a Tauhnsi i:•te~rsi ~~y f~fr^. C>^,_~o3«t L"+Yr Are ate. fr,3 3.L~w_~ s :tst=•ca~sst' LAS thi° 3aZn-,ut L~f thsea srof~sL-+3>° }~ro}~>`rty in gLfr.~StiL-+»= i »sr 3 ur.3ir•,s? •blsL~ ersYi :nst i »r~ !sL-vseA a~rx3 3 ~-+wr-rs a, »sew erttstarl..s w,~u.3.si nsafct± it• insssL~=~ei~3e tL~ ~r'e~t ~-,r,:~~c,~rs:i t.~Lro»s»cr^ri a3 b+..si I,:Si »qs_+ r.3uer t:L, Iar_f4 L~f~ i=,:~c~t:as,3e 3eft: tivai 3ai~3e .--ft~r rsa,csa»~ of •ti~i~• ~i:ee t+s= 3 L-+t g is, riivit3i»a3• sarL~gser^tw :i»•tn twr+ 3r;i:ex F~3~,:a w~~u3t:i sssa!•cty t ~e es>szi 3 3 rar c,=+nsnssarc i c+ 3 3 L1t ra» u»e>= L~»L~,n) } ~ Gi3 ressss»arst. ilea ~se3ir_•~sa tf-sai• i#: is ~L-+s3ii33ss thai• Fi :ia~b< <•>f u»titar*~ta»t3i»x:s a~a ~}:,-, sassar•t•3;~ ~L'~Yd tf)1° ~+rL'+~~L~>^t}~ is 3taic3 r.,ut {i,e, t3-re r:.~ar=t siai:_. ,af ~,rc~r+ertti•• '~',~r ~r^,~~-~>~,--~ci sat>srn»er•~~aa1 t.s~.~.l sna_~ 3•>zsvrr_ too itafas3 'QL', ASt~ A71'91.5 »t:ji r^at d»tj} »f.}, ~3~L1t tf~L* >: ~~r rt Ct >':.si^~ti z,:-,»i»~•s L•y) •t:s`sT •=,tsrrL~ts»tii »~ y.-,rL•~,L"+i:!r't i e_=.:c f-sa•~s ~e•~~r-r nsi ~-• ~t at ~sri i» ~: fi P?~ s= a to t «. Fi »,•~ F i r»L•~ i rs >4 s a:-^ :.• is ~,sss i t t eci t L-, is =•,.ta 3 rya eta •~ ee [;;f~it~it Si ar>i3 £~.+ F3tfi;ar_S•seri. r~r^,:,sss i.=sc33.i.tsit f-„ ~,.~z,tti s.-:iI2 nL~i.i>=x:~ •~!•ss~ ar_:tt.s,~3 <_:Yi:~sn ,•>f ttse arQFa ;:~~ bsc•~ c3e~,.~e3 ~~~+sari f'~+r c~~sssrsey-t i a1 t.s~as_~ i ~ L~n31f c:L'r :~s 2 ~~5r . +'~3 _„-:,, ;~:t e• 3~:;e »:::,} s-~ •i'~43s~ r-:~::~e~-t.r. t: ,:, t t•ss>_~ i syssssr.~,~i a•#~ s= »,:.r'?, h i ~ k.sr r-er-.+ ? •~, ~e,~r:,FC-' ;:::._r; a r>~ i <- t~+ i _•.~, tr, s »>` tst .i 3 :i r>-e~+~ ~,s r ...._:::i;~::»L.~. ?;-~:* S:~r,~:::+s>y,?-,}: .~+-, t?->~ pass»s:.>j~ai•:e a,•,aut:3`s 7s rr:~r_.t.se-:-••`in.•, ti-:•i?~!•hr•~r^ ~`.--^d ,,r >_-~ iL~1ni»s~, v,+hie?-ssr~,~sar vsL-,r'ft:~ `-,ut • • :•dt~• ~.•?~•3:it=tire ?-.'-sa i~.~:t3L~stii»~ }~rt•~r+t~c-;a2 .s .af at }~3ex~v~. t~h~ :eh-,2sr^d., s~,+ti~+_s 3r; F: »erb3 r+ +s~ tL, t,et tr_~r i~t> .:s t+3 ~• +t,:., rirR•Nr•:3 L+~ the ~+r^a~•~rrty *;:~r+ t,~a Lf~:3tii~ E1 =: C>t5i?3 int'r_3 :s.» L"?Ltr L1r•i.~i»a3 rta:.>.,~»e sti.st+s)5atta3 :•sr)tt zs3•;L-, ct_+»fL-+r•A5 t+,, t:?>c_ sjR~ir^e:~• t~f t!-se City >~ttar-»Leys a.. tr-+ r^Q:r,-~»t"~ tht~ w!-5L~3e }3r^L~yser~t_w C-~.~ rt•+t3-5er t'.hta» ~-Ca. 4~ hsv,<~• r••~~t,ssc-~~+t nt3 e•yi dc:~~ +_.+f the L~>^rii »a»r_e vef~i r_!] s_ii=~r32L-~twsa r^ta~irlenta.c~3 u:aLa ~t C-G ~r^~-,~+er^t y, T!•53~ ^~tt:~teus)5ersst ~i ~ ~5atie it°) t h~• F R• ~' hr_aw rt_ath~•s^ r_o»3°u~er3 +..5=+,~ ~:'t.sQ tt-+ i-•hr= 3t at ts~, ~.~f' t ham= }-+r'cs+r~r^tY" ^C.,.~ ti-sr~: .ims>5edi ate »L~r••t3•s~ t.+rri»s~ C_t a»d r+ccts~,iet-3 L°I•? re•s+ider)tia3 ~,oth, 3dE:' a3st•? ~snLir.-:r=-~i`z•.+r)ci tti)i~: }-,r,,-•rycsrt~}~ t:.~ iwf_ rs~es~»t:I_s~ ~-+s.srcha~^w•t3. T!>s~- s`-sc#_~+ t•~»ti }'=Sr)da»L-~g tv,+ict_ rei~er~ }c, ]`•t5e },r^L~~,eri~ }~ -: ~ ~~ h,e:+ »t+rt h i n ~r^rL->r` { i , er. "ss »r~ 3~ fii1 A5 .] 3.)~ Y^£~_~•SCjF >')CE~" i',Y) ~., r?1 f~f G• '~[_ ~»{j a''r 5~r_~3Y) "•~] »~3~ fain5i 3 Y y,+:.w.~~.tiee»ti ad " L~r> }s~s~~s~ 7~ f4!-:ll „ 3» rl»1~ Lavrn»•~., we zrre:* vri33ir)~ t`-, .witch L~ur• :tom+»i»r,~ r'=_s~s.sr.:ni; i:+:> t":-t•15 it' 4:`•-•~' a4~»i»~ i4, thr~ cL-+»t=Pr» with fi•h ~.. 3 s •th i a i <= •s;:t i 3 3 ~~ ~~rc+i~l en>s s»~•~y w~ ~3 tAo:+ae rs•r.;~iv,~•~ srir'a';. wf~» ti,•tir^vs»e»t. rat iL-?» L~f thi ~ r~rrli»a»r: e., a)»+~ 'itsi~--:z:ts+.scs»~t 3_s~ r•+~c~ut ~t rtr`c:+»cife~thrr^ ri s.~.~st:~ t,, re_ai de L1r) '4~~"5 L" ,Y`L1 .7 E+r`~:•y' tS r'~~X j ?+~.~3 s? L~~• ~:iaif.~ ~r'L'~Qtay,•{-y i '~. _••+inr_t E~.F_'•T oi= t:t>P ~+s•r-+~r_-r•ty fr`,a»t t~r.+Q k+s-~e» r•e•~i c!e»t a r3 a»s3 hr:,~ as-st+r:rA.Ii»r~ s»afis.srs~ 3a»r~~.;ra}.'~i»~ 3» exi~ta»r_•r 33 r^E'~2iL~y~ Yir> Y^E`L,+VL:'~t itir•?.i Y>f~ r3 l+_+srr+~d tti.+ 3 C+cIYE.° tl»Cj isn~+>`i.YF3 Lss:>+~n s+ahai; Yx i _,ts {y,si t: h an x 3 s :~-t3'stsr.•3c } r•ast3ser^ tha» ~te,=+tr^L-+y. t. 3•se~ 1~eilvi~.ifv3 fr-L-+r~~t;~+t7r.•.> ii3Y^r~~i•dy <ate~»r3ir)~ iY) t~rsit.•r ltL1 smut. ir•) F.5 :=~~ 3a~r>cisx.:a}~i»~ 'fi5L°{•t+ack. The }~L~r^ t i +~n L1•~ t P>e 3 r,t W+E'~ r~ 3 rl» tY, rj t+•re2 L•,~) t i~Ml>)]erc i a 13 y s:t~»i~ai»m, s>5aa»3~~ smear`;cins~ and cir^ivewaY tai 3L-+t»~ent.. L,'}_s +~L~t.s3r3 tif- •,~~ry v,+i 3 3 i »g t: L1 ~~n~~.tsre any u}~s?r^AC3i »Q C+'s= t`sn s<r-•a•Ye2 sr±a_~t~~5r.?»t~ »ererie!r:}. ;,. a =; f,3r a:_•+ •t~hc fsr>r_i nn~ c~-+»t,er^sr~•. ~r•L-,~.sL+ht tisp S» thti~ f=ar.:t ~~5~d F':i nrii »~5:~1 fr:»ci»s~ }}I a»~ a~ rr-4ady exi _st i» LL-~r•atir.+5 bi.si .? r3.4 »ta }~~3R:rnrn~ Ttr the =•t:,LSt:t> a»d sa~:~Gt~ ~L~u»r.~ar`i ew of t,LSr ~ros:+>}r+t y. yl>?~ wL~ss2 ri ~t:r ha}~t^+Y tL~ ~>r~•rr•t fem^i »~ L~r) ~~s`>:!n'rC yY:?LS 21 £~ci .an '~'r1 Y' yC,UY^ LL~Y+t~11:'; Lr+Y`A'~i 7~1?r) L?7 L"~~.S Y" S.7 r't~~~?~a35w n] YZt.'Y: }^C ~ Yt i /' ~.. c.„ sls.se CL~ •t~hn snr_;»~- ;~e3~-.~y=, wL+ have f'xs~E?s`:xer)L^£rt3 1Yit•h thiNs rc>>::i:,r>E' r•s_r>,+.sc:~•~~~ v)e:r r++o;s3d a~+~s~•r~c.izr•te e»y ~~~~,:-5t,3~ n5e,•_•~»s~ t=,f *?Y~ i~?r:~ its ins 3->~! t.i n,::+3 s~i-a:.~er~ Lei= i.~hi~1. r`er.~}urr~t:, "~`>ar•)lr yi-.u. r ~G i S~'oE ~,2 0 ~Q T~ _~~~Z"I32T A T ~,~ES~-,uT S!',oLE: /~= Zoe ,.. ~_ ~-' ~ .~ i ~__ /- ~./ LAQG-~ ___~ C ~..J,J,~/ i~EC `~ s ~ ~ ~" /~ LPL a c i3uSN~ S. ~~9-~ 1 /3S.o: 3~-6 /,3/. 0 3, , 1 yo L ~-o ,S~'iS!'o ~ S .QES~/dEUCe 1 (o~/ V 7 rvC,eG~t~.vs ++// ~ ~~j~ C2AVC~- L ASr/h~,c./T /3.5-- SIQC c/~GG,~ ~~~ T vr~ N ,~o.o D -o ~~' /8-3 PA r.~o I ~ y-y GAQAGE /~-(o (bNC'4~'c SCAB y3-e -> ~ ~ ~ ti ` P ~ o ~ S~ \~ l l (~~: ` LAesc fVEz G~PFE~t 1~ ~ T,2~E ! \ =\ ~~ j ,ti '~ ~ //, / ~~ ,~ ~ / ~ ~ I 1 ~ l' v ~\ ~ ~oSC i3uS~S ~oc/E~e_ POGC ~~ l._3 '/ ~ 30 / 3G.oG c.~C ~ Sao ~ ~~' a ~~ ,~-~ ~,/1' % T W.~TH w,c %c",yoUS~s~o~ ,c'oos-.lo~~ ~Y V v W CN~C/~1~4/T ~q2K/~JG ,I.¢EA 3 ~ ~ EL/l~P~ y ~~-awe 2 Pe ~ e. 30• /~JE~2rq s~0.v ,~ oA1~ • Thomas ~~ DEVELOPMENT CO. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION March 7, 1994 Ms. Shari L. Stiles Meridian Planning Director 33 E. Idaho Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Ms. Stiles: • Thomas C. Mannschreck President 111 Auto Drive, Suite 105 Boise, Idaho 83709 (208) 375-8877 FAX (208) 375-8985 Thank you for meeting with me on Friday, March 4 to discuss the re-zone application pending on properties located on the east side of Meridian Road north of James Court. We support Mr. Sciscoe's application to re-zone his property to CC and our property to LO. Mr. Sciscoe has agreed to fence, at his expense, the easterly and southerly property lines of his property. We would like to work together with Mr. Sciscoe to make sure the fence is compatible with other development we will be doing to the east. The Meridian City Zoning & Development ordinance suggests a 35 ft. wide landscape vista on the Meridian Road frontage. We intend to build an attractively landscaped structure. However, until we have finalized our site plan, we are reluctant to agree to a landscape strip that is 35 ft. wide. We would rather work that out with you when we submit our building permit application. If yi~ii ~'iaJ2 un>~ further questions; please let me know. TCM/CC cc: Robert R. Angell Larry D. Stevens ~s~.~. F E R- i 7- 9 4 T H U 1 0 e 3~ ITC S O U T H P$ i • • t=AX'TRAN3MI77AR T(): WAYNE t~C~RREY a~ - ~ ~ ~ 1 ~{ StX PAGES Dear Wayne: is there anyone besides yourself that it would be beneTttlai Tor us tp send the folto~Mhp fetter m in order for us to get this problem wortced out? The paper sent for us to approve or disapprove seems pretty rness®d-up to . us. We hadn't realized it would be the final i=acts and Findinyts. What will happen if we dtsapprovs~ tt tsn't at aft what we had in mind for our property and we're finding some problems with it's contents. Please inform. We know you are busy and we're sorry to have tp bother you with this matter, but ~ nsally b afTedin~ our whole situation in a negafnre way. We'll be in Nebraska until February 21st and in Boils on the 24th or so. Our phone ~ 40273-81372 and vve can be reached by FAK at Thanks for your adv~ca. ~~y~ ! ~~~~~„ ~GiScwt Sincerety, `j/( 9- C. ~(F., car MiGhaai and Cynthia Scisooe S ~~a--~-~' >rr' ~~ , ~~. j_ ~ x_ .~ 4 ~_ 8533 FEB- 1 '7'-94 THU 1 0.37 I TiG SOUTH P 02 • • February 15,1994 To Whom It May Concern: We have appreciated the efforts pu! forth b work out our Zoning Request which vVe flied in Octaber,1993. Regarding the most recent Findings of t=act and Conclusions sent to us br approval, we have many ems. We are new t8 these proceedings, and perhaps this is typical of Zoning Requests, but vNO find ourseMes very confused regarding several issues and seek oiarification on haw our r~~~est has been bandied. May we oudine our oortcems: A) Before ever considering purchasirr9 the property in question, w+e had two MAIN prerequisites: one, that we would be able to five in the house, and two, that we be able b have our Retail Bookstore on the property. As our Mkiat request states, vra are a family run business. A secondary desire was babe allowed to ha~ne a small woodshop on the property, also, it possible. ~ Our first concern appeared do ba na problem with this property, sirfce the house to the immediate noritr was already zoned Commercial General, and there were (and stet are) peapte residing in the house on the property. In order b determine whether our second prerequisite would be a problem, we spotce with Mr. Wayne t=orrey (current City Planner). At that meeting, Mr. Forney felt very poski~s abaft a C-G zoning eizarrge due to the taut that the property b the north {which is a iwv-sfiory house) was already zoned C-G find that k would fit in very weA with the Meridian City Comprehensive Plan. He mentioned how beneficial it wputd be Eo dp so, eocptained the Zoning Request procedures and gave us the applications. ~) The Ar9t P ~ Z Meeting head on November 9th was a very positive one. The only complaint spoken was that of Doris Barrett, who awns {and currently fives on) the property directly b the north. She felt a fend ought tia be required between her and acrr property. This reauest was ruled out by Mrs. Barrett then sat down and said nothing further. The Board did not mention any furtller problems with the request and it was su~pested that k be approved tar Facts and Findings, which it #ren was. Nothing else was brought to our atter-tion at that meeting as being a problem. We subsequently purchased the property and closed in December. We band a renter tar the duration of the Zoning Request procedures since we are unable as yet to move there with our business. 13) Within the fotlpwing month, v+re heard from Mr.l=orrey that the City Atta~ney, Mr. Kirtcston, was apparerdly having a problem at same sort regarding the zoning request We were Fold that since Meridian Road appeared do be a main entryway into the cky, tl-at Mr. Kirkston was teemed about the wide generat.usage permitted by a Commercial General zoning and was feeling the City needed m have some prabeotion from unsightly busineSSSS being put therein #ro future after we solo the property some years later. Mr. Forney discussed the tuning option of Neighborhood-Commercial (GN) with us. We referred ~ the Zoning and Development Ordinance (1963) br Meridian and believed the C-N Zvning tD be suitable for our purposes and had no problem with our request being changed do that, which we communicated l3o Mr. Forrey. F E D- 1 7- 9 4 T H U 1 0 3 8 ITC S D U T H P 0 3 _ . • 'T'his was conveyed to the Hoard and the deoision was to be made at the next P ~ Z Meeting. ~ We were IMormed that oonsideratlon for our request was postponed unlit ,lanuary 1 ith. At that meeting. Mr. Forney presrnted our new request and since a C-N desiyfnatkut requires that the property owner wnrtc dtreclfy vuidr a City Planning and honing official th approve the proposed business, hs asked that wee be able tit work with himself due ~ his knowledge of our proposal. Ne alroa-dy knew that ~ would fit into the plan for the area, oat being unsightly i» appears»~, etc. We aren't exactly suns what the decisiW- regarding this request fumed out to be at this meeting. Wa know Mr_ Forney had received somq sort of pksy ep des! directly with Mr. KirlcaLon on some of the details. Mr. IGrkston THEN stated that he had a problem with the property being zoned Commercial a# all, since the law st~rtes that one cannot residr: on on a commercially zoned property. How tfiis oan be, wee donY understand! We know fbr s fact tihat the Berretta have recently purchased the property directly next door to the north, and we knc~nnr for a fact they am residing oat it and chat it is zoned C-<3. We dWn't know if iQ would be appropriate far us to bring this up with the Hoard at the meeting, so we did not F) We subsequently seeks with Mr. Forney to inquire what decision held been made regarding the GN Zoning. Fie informed us chat there didn't appear m be a big problem, but that we'd need to work out sametlting in writing and it would need to be agreed upon between Mr.1(irkston and our~sehre~s. Being trrrfamiliar with what was going on anyway, wee agreed to trarme Mr. Kirkston work out ttla "agreemerrC' since he would need to approve it in the end. We also believed that it was clearly stated in our Zoning Request exactly what we were desiring. Since he had read that, we felt okay about this. G) We had been planning a family trip to Nebraska for months prior th these problems and had ib leave the area, so Mr. f=array sent the proposal that Mr. KirficsEan had written up Eo our Nebraska location. This turns out to be the Findings of Fact and Conclusions that we are herein speaking of. The descriptions in dris paper are so much in opposition ttr what wee initially requested in the first place. and we are very confused as th how all of these changes oanre tQ be. We feel vve'vr: been misinformed {possibly Just due to our ignorance of the official soundir~ lsinguage used at the meetings) about what had Maken place prier th this. We feel we have been left out of this decision altogether. 1s this typical of these procedures? h appears by this paper, that Mr. IGricston has made certain deductiate that wa had no idea were even problems or considerations. We r®spect Mc Kirkston's position as City Attorney, we just wondor where these issues came from, because they were never verbalised at either afi the public meetings. It states at the end of the report, that if we do not agree with the f ndings chat it is recrommended that our I1pp1'ication be denledl By the way, the Findings of Fact even have propeRy spoken of for rezone request the! are not erren irwiuded in the original request How could we even consider approving or dissppr~oving rezoning pn~perty that has no rezone requested? We are hereby requesting permission to sit dawn with Mr. Forney and Mr. lGrlcsbon bo discuss the zoning request that we Initially flied so that we can clearly understand the issues brought up in the Findings and Fact since we were net made aware of them o#tarwisa. We beliarnod that this was to tae the case already. Ws had no idea this was F E D- i T- 9 4 T H U 1 0~ ITC SOUTH ~ P 0 4 to be written up as our last option or we would never have agrEed to it being wr~ten without us. ff necessary, we can type up ~- detailed list of the areas in question on the Findings and Fact that aro confusing us. There are also a couple Qf arose of inconsistency. Otherwise, we will be back in tawm on the 24th of February, and Can meet rah you after that date. We do have one further request Since wa were under tho impression (as a result of our talks with Mr. parray and how the meetings were sounding to us), that things were going okay with our zonirr~ roquest, we had planned to move onto the property by March 1st. Our renters will be nwving and we have made arrangements bo relocate our home and our bookstore. Realizing that we cannot as yet open our Retail Baatce6ane on the property until, and ff, the zoning is worked out, is there any possibility of our at least operating the Mail Order end of our book business from the e~dsting garage on the propertlR A smelt portion of the book bu:mess Is maH wrier and this way, we wouldn't have iro glue up ALL of our income from ~ bookstore by closing down completely u this can be approved by March 1st. i~lea-se intarm whether this is a possibility or not so ttsatwe can deride upon our living situation, Since~yrelyy~ Michael and rrthia $ciscoe FEE - i T- 9 4 T H U 1 0 3 9 ITC SOUTH P 0 5 • • THE FOLLOWING OUTLINES THE PROBLEMS FOUND WITHIN THE FACTS AND FINDINGS IN gUESI'ION A. We initially requested C=C3 zoning because tha property directly north of this ire is alrsadytorred C-G. The owr-er dimly south is also requestAng C~ and has business plans for that property also. We have absolutely no immediate plans hr sell our property, but had assumed that vve would be selling dawn the road at some time. We felt assured about our zoning request since the house ~ the north is already zoned CA and the City Planner, when asked, felt pcasiti+re about the idea and encouraged us. When the time comes i~ar us be relocate, wq i5etleved tha new buyer would most likely NOT be interested in luring on the property since it would be "sandwiched" between !wo rommerciai properties and probably would have business plans for tfie house ado. This gave us confidence in proceeding t0 purrlrase the property, as Hre have done in the meantime. Witfr the proposal do keep the house paR of tho property as residentiat {rage 8, #8), we aro now unsuro as io how much trouble we wig hav~a in seliirq ti're property when R becomes necessary. Facks as ourseh~s. seeking a family run business setup Bice wa believed this th be, are few and far between. B. Can you please give us reference for tha law staring that one cannot reside on Commeroial property {Page 8, rY~? ff such- is factual, what will be done about the residenes ~ the north? rt would appear that the hwir k being broken here. Rafe 7, #YAc is in error in thtrt the CA zoned property directly north has been left out of fhe neighborhood descrip'iDon. C. C-G zoning for all, as intialty requested, would also require the least amount of setback space. Being our property already has such a small area for our business, the other proposed zonings besides C-G (Wage 8, !~ would require so much addidonai set back, that it would leave very little, if any, space br our purposes at att. Our understanding is that the house and the leftover space (for the business) would be made into two separate lots each with different zonings. We already have limitdd space do build on-the separate tote as requirod by separate zonings would do' away with our business space altpgether due th the extra set books, net aNowing us tD be able fp have any busi»ess there. Q, if d'-e law does, in fact, allow people to reside on Commerotai property (as is currently occurring throughout Meridian, even with recently purchased properties such as the Barrens), and if n-e only other ooncem is that Meridian Road not have business' located thereon that would not be appropriate for a city eMryv+ray, can't fhb rote on Pape 5, fK3 bo incorporated? ft states that the city has authority do place oond'itions on a rexane. Can't the Board simply require that ail ovrnera of GC3 property in question be required ro have business' preapproved, or be r+esquired to have zoning changed m a lesser Commercial mnlnp at the time of any resale? Since the Board has expressed aocep>+ance of both Sdscoe's and Dorado's proposed usage of the property In question, this would suro seem bo simplify things far aH parties involved in the request, sw,-++,tr-~+~~ The following lists discrepancies #ound in the Facts and Findings that we'd tike th bring th goer atker-tion: 4. Page 2, d's 2 and 3 mention i.21 acres and Page 7, rl~ mention the proposal to zone 7.21 acres Located behind the properties In question, as t.-O. That property is not included in this request Please see property descrlptkui In our anginal zoning request 2. Page 7, ~ shows a recommended C-C zoning fa our business and Page a #10 shows a C-N recommendation for the same. 3. Page 2, #2 staties'that there is a single family residence to the north... " Ths property 1io the immediate rwrit- Is zoned C-f3 and has a couple living on the properly. FEB-1?-'94 THU 10:40 ITiG SDUTH P O6. .y ~ • Page 7, f18v also negleots fio mention this fact. K again states "single f8imily resident~af . This faa seams to be overlooked altogether. Being that it appears th us to be a yem imDOrtarrt detail oonoeming our whole toning requ~ vve wanted th make sure the City Attorney and the Board were aware of this fact. 4. Page 4, #10 and Page 8, #10 speak of fencing problems. Much attention appears b be given m this issue. At the very first P & Z meeting held on November #th, Mrs. Barrett {the neighbor directly th the north) was the only person with ©bjections tD our zoning request. She stated two things at that meeting. One, thed she had noceived no word of our inttariione. As your records IndicaEe (Page 5, #1), notRce was sent expi~ining our ir>tisntions. We couldn"t undenstand how she would haves been notified of the meeting she was in att~sndance at otherw~, $nyws~ryr. Two, that she felt we ought to be required to put fencing up between our property and hers since we wen puttlng a business up. This issue aFrpear+sd to have already been dealt with at that meeting. h was atat~ed by the Board that since she xiready resided on Commercial property, ~(s r+equeet could not be considered, since there were no regulations requiring fenCirtq be put up between two Commercial properties and that it miDht be different ff her property had been Reeldentiai. She then sat down and vr~e haves not been irdtxn~sd of any further communications between her ahd the Board. We had not mentioned d. taut we had plans for f®c-clnp anyway, whether it was required a not. We must admit here, however, that we are quite baffled as th why this fer~ing issue has been given so much emphasis here singe it appeared ~ be dealt with at the first meeting. We would greatly appredate your assistance in helping to sohre r problems regarding these Facts and Findings. Thank you. ~ . ,mod. / /~ Mlcf~ciSOO~e j Cynthia ~isco~'/ MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: FEBRUARY_8, 1994 APPLICANT: DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 1 MIKE SCISCOE REQUEST: REOUEST FOR REZONE - TABLED AT JANUARY 11, 1994 MEETING AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA STREET NAME COMMITTE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ~9 9~ ~ c c~ r~vc JAMES E. BRUCE, President GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary November 3, 1993 T0: Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe Dorado Development Co Inc 1711 N 30th Boise ID 83703 FROM: Larry Sale, Supervisor Development Services SUBJECT: MERIDIAN REZONE - MERIDIAN N/O JAMES R40 to CG Your application for the above referenced project was approved by the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District on November 3, 1993. The attached staff report lists the conditions of approval and street improvements which are required. If you have any questions, cc: Development Services Chron Meridian City Hall please feel free to call me at 345-7680. ~, ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 • • G~f,C JAMES E. BRUCE, President GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary TO: ACRD Commission INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE MFRRZMER/DSTECH 11-3-93 DATE: October 28, 1993 FROM: Development Services SUBJECT: Meridian Rezone Meridian n/o James R40 to CG (Applicant - Dorado Development Co., Inc./Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe, 1711 N. 30th St., Boise, ID 83703) (Representative - Michael Sciscoe, same address) FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe are requesting a rezone from R-40 'to CG for 1.0 acre of property located at the northeast corner of Meridian Road and James Court. The requested zoning desig- nation of CG (General Commercial) will allow construction of an office building on the site. This site is a part of a larger area that was annexed into the City of Meridian this year with a zoning of R40 to allow devel- opment of a multi-family residential housing project. The District placed a requirement for a traffic study (not submit- ted yet) on the plat approval for Bridgewood Park and may be requiring that James Court be upgraded to a public collector street. 2. reridian Road currently has b0-feet of right-of-way and is fully improved with a 41-foot street section. The street was reconstructed in 1992 and no pavement cuts will be allowed without Commission approval. The 2000 Urban Functional Street Classification Map designates Meridian as a minor arterial roadway. The District requires a minimum of 90-feet of right-of-way on arterials in an urban impact area, width sufficient for 5 traffic lanes, 5-foot sidewalks, and bicycle pathways. The ultimate right-of-way will be acquired when a specific development plan is submitted. 3. James Court is a private street on an easement that is im- proved with a curb along the south side and 20-feet of pav- ing. The approach at Meridian Road. is 24-feet wide and is too ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 ~~eridian Rezone Meridian n/o James R~to CG ^~ctober 28 , 19~ Page 2 narrow to handle the potential traffic from a proposed 80-unit subdivision (Bridgewood Park) at the east end. of the street along with the existing apartment complex (50 living units access James Court), and also whatever may be built on subject property (assuming .it takes access to this street). 4. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridi- an Planning & Zoning Commission on November 9, 1993. If the rezone is approved and. development proceeds, the District will provide the following recommendations to Meridian Planning & Zoning as conditions for approval. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Submit a Traffic Impact Study to the District. Coordinate with Traffic Services Department prior to beginning the study. Additional requirements may be imposed pending the findings of the study and any design engineering work accom- plished prior to the District's review and approval of the study is entirely at the risk of the applicant.. 2. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridi- an abutting parcel (15 additional feet). The owner will. be compensated far this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this. benefit zone. 3. Utility street cuts in the. new pavement on Meridian Road will not be allowed unless approved by the District Commission. 4. Access to Meridian Road and .James Court will be restricted. Coordinate with District staff prior to submitting a specific development plan. 5. Replace unused curb cuts on Meridian Road with standard curb, gutter and sidewalk. 6. Provide a minimum of 40-feet of right-of-way and a 41-foot street section on James Court from Meridian Road to the east- ern boundary of subject parcel. Reconstruct the existing roadway section to District standards. The existing curb and 4-foot sidewalk may be .retained. STANDARD REQUIREMEN'T`S .~ 7, Street :and drainage improvements required in the public right- of-way shall. be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies.. :•Ieridian xezor~e Mer~ar. ti/o ,:lames R40 to CC~ October 28, 1993 ~~an Z 3. ried.icated streets and drainage systems shall be designed. and r..onstrizcted in conformance with District standards and laoli- o.ies . + ~?. Specifi.cations, land. surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, u.esign information and calculations presented to ACRD shall. be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with ?daho Ccde, Section 54-1215. .;_0. Provide written approval from the appropriate irriga- tion/drainage district authorizing storm runoff. into their system. il. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drain- age appurter,anees, etc.) outside of the proposed street im- provements. Authorization. f.or relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. ~_2, Coiztinue existing irrigation and drainage sl,*ste~ns across par- cel. 13. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District. for review and appropriate action. 14. Submit site drainage plans and calculations ~L-or review and appropriate action by ACHD. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the. requirements. of the City of Meridian and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public ~•ight-of-way or in a drainage ea~;ement set aside specif- ically for that use. '"here shall be no trees, fences, bushes, shads, or other ~:aluabi.e amenities placed in said easement. 1.5. Provide design data for proposed. access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACRD. 16. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. 17. .;nstall a stop sign en every unsignalized approach :-~f a project street to an .intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be in- stalled when the project street is first accessible to the motoring public. 18. Aright-of-way permit must be obtained. from ACRD for all street and utility construction within the public right.-of- ,Meridian Reno Meridian n%o James October 28, 19°.~!l :r~ac~e ~4 R• to CG way. Contact Construction Servicea at 345-7667 (with zoning file n~unber) for details. 19. T~ request for modification, variance or waiver of any require- ment or policy outlined herein shall. be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within. l5 calendar days of the original Commission action. `1'he request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments,. please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING: I,a:rrv Sale DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: Gov n 31~s3 _~~ CENTRAL •• DISTRICT `i11'HEALTH DEPARTMENT REVIEW SHEET Rezone # fc'~D -~ ~• ~= - Conditional Use # Preliminary/Final/Short Plat ,~i(~~'cfH.~D ,/~EY~''~jy~-r-~i ~i~ ~1~.~.(,.®~._,~ ~s-..~~i.~ .SiJCJr: Retum to: ^ BoISe ^ Eagle ^ Garden City Meridian Kuna ^ ACZ ^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal. ^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. ^ 3. Specrfic knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewge disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: '~ Central sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water well ^ Interim sewage ~ Central water ^ Individual sewage ^ Individual water ^ 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ^ Central sewage ^ Community sewage system^ Community water ^ Sewage dry lines ^ Central water ^ 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probelm. ^ 10. This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined 'rf other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any: ^ Food establishment ^ ^ Beverage establishment ^ ^ 13. Swimming pools or spas ^ Child Care Center Grocery store DATE: O/l- ~~ Reviewed by: O~ i~G'~a CDHD 10-91 rcb • NUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ~~ - • -• - OFFICIALS A Goad Place to Live ,- ,~ ..~ ., WAYNE S- FORREY. AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS. Treasurer , CT~~ T O~ 1 Y ME RID IAN ~ ~ . • COUNCI:MEN RONALD R. TOLSM~ BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Suot. , ROBERTGIESLER WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MAX YERRINGTON JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Suot. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 IF1(Im~~O L~ tll~li1~1ULLCCII ® ROBERTO.CORRIE BILL GORDON. Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 ~~ L V L~ ChalrmanZonfng;Plan, JIM JOHNSON GARY SMITH, P.E.. City Engineer FAX (208) 887813 a ~ p ~ r ,q~3 Centennial Coordinate GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your co ments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridia n •~ CO w~~S ma>~ we hive your ar..^:.wer by: ~ ~lE~ -.. ~ u Q TRANSMITTAL DATE: (~,~-~-d~r 15 Jgg~ HEt~RING DATE ~plleh~~P.l' 9 )qg3 REQUEST: ~ ZO tY` ~' 4O ~ ~ r++~e~` ~ ~ CGS BY : ~rC-t~ d U U ~lo~~,e.r.~- ~n ! ~Yl 1 ch0.e~ ~tn~ l.[111'~h;q SC : ci..~P LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT = ZZ J ~ ~'l~ . n'1er;~la~ ~a( I~D f`•~ 0~ V'12~'f`y L n ph ~P.+"i G i Ch i~ ~~ JIM JOHNSON P/I "MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE AIIDJANI,P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C «TTIFRS IRRIGATION DISTRICT BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER C0.-(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BOB GIESLER, C/C U.S WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) MAX~YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND fINAI PLATS) BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. CITY FILES BUILDING INSPECTOR OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation POLICE DEPARTMENT District has no comment on the rezone for CITY ATTORNEY ora o eve opment Co. Michael and Cynthia 6ARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER Sciscoe at 22 ]0 North Meridian Road. WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER o ~~.-. ill HPnann~ Fnram^n Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District ~' 3 ~ 1 ~ J•.g `....... , ., • I ~ • I ~ _ . j-- _ _ j 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 28 October 1993 Bob Angell Dorado Development Co., Inc. P. O. Box 2666 Boise, ID 83701 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 RE: Land Use Change Application for Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe Dear Mr. Angell: Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above- referenced development. You are also being sent a complete packet of information concerning Land Use Change, urban irrigation, and exclusion. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call on Donna Moore at the District's office or John Anderson, the District's Water Superintendent at the District's shop. Sincerely, DAREN R. COON, SECRETARY/TREASURER NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT DRC/dnm cc: File Water Superintendent Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe City of Meridian ~0~~( ~. - APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS • 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS • 40,000 _ J • BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AD ZONING COMMISSION DORADO DEVELOPMENT & MICHAEL AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE REZONE APPLICATION 2210 N. MERIDIAN ROAD MERIDII3.N, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled matter having come on for public hearing March 9, 1993, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., the Petitioners, Michael Sciscoe and Bob Angel, for Dorado Development, appearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian having duly considered the evidence and the matter, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That a notice of a public hearing on the Rezone Application was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for November 9, 1993, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the November 9, 1993, hearing; that the matter was again considered at the December 14, 1993, and January 11, 1994, meeting, that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to the newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That this property is located within the City of Meridian FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 1 • • and is owned by the Applicant, Dorado Development Company, and which property is described in the application which description is incorporated herein; that the property is presently zoned R-40 Residential but is now vacant land; the area in which Applicants' property is located has a house located thereon and the remainder of the property is vacant land; that there is an apartment complex to the south; there is a residential subdivision to the east across Meridian Road; that there is a single family residence to the north; that there is substantial commercial development farther to the south; that it was stated in the public hearing that the property being purchased by the Sciscoe's is .41 of an acre and the remaining property to be used by Dorado Development is 7.21 acres. 3. As stated above, the property is presently zoned R-40, Residential; the Applicants have requested that the property zoned General Retail and Service Commercial (C-G) and the Sciscoe's propose to use the home as a home, operate a book store on the property, operate a small custom cabinetry and furniture business at the far end of the bookstore, and Dorado Development proposes to use the remainder of the property for a single level office building which would provide tenancy for professional uses such as doctors, dentist, attorneys, real estate and/or insurance agencies but the C-G zoning is requested. 4. That the C-G District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 11 follows: (C-G) General Retail and Service Commercial: The purpose of the (C-G) District is to provide for commercial uses which are customarily operated entirely or almost entirely within a FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 2 • • building; to provide for a review of the impact of proposed commercial uses which are auto and service oriented and are located in close proximity to major highway or arterial streets; to fulfill the need of travel-related services as well as retail sales for the transient and permanent motoring public. All such districts shall be connected to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian, and shall not constitute strip commercial development and encourage clustering of commercial development. 5. That the property is contained in a Mixed /Planned Use Development area as shown on the Generalized Land Use Map of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 6. That the property has frontage on Meridian Road; that Meridian Road is designated as an Entryway in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan; that the Entryway Corridors Goal Statement includes the following statement: "4.4U Encourage 35-foot landscaped setbacks for new development on entrance corridors. The City shall require, as a condition of development approval, landscaping along all entrance corridors. ." 7. That sewer and water is available to the property. 8. That comments were submitted by the City Engineer and are incorporated herein as are the comments of the Meridian Fire Department, the Central District Health Department, Meridian School District, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, and Meridian Planning Director. Those comments are incorporated herein as if set forth in herein. 9. That Planning Director submitted two comment sheets, one date November 5, 1993 and one dated January 6, 1994; that in the November comments he stated the zone change to C-G complied with the Comprehensive Plan, that the Comprehensive Plan indicates a FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 3 need for service commercial in this area, and that as site development plans are prepared and submitted, the City staff will review any site designs to achieve a high quality project as called for'the Comprehensive Plan; that in his January comments he stated that he had met with the Sciscoe, at the request of the Planning and Zoning Commission to discuss the C-G zoning, and it was agreed by the Sciscoe's that a C-N zone would allow them to do what they desired but would blend in better with what was already adjacent to the land; that similar discussions were not held with Dorado Development. 10. That the abutting neighbor to the north, Doris Baret, indicating that she was not sure what type of business was proposed on the property and that she desired that a fence be constructed betweenXhe property and this development. 11. That the property was recently annexed and zoned; that the requested zone was R-40. 12. T\hat the Limited Office District allows for professional offices; that Limited Office District, is set forth in 11-2-408 B 7. as follows: jL-O) Limited Office District: The purpose of the (L-O) District is to permit the establishment of groupings of professional, research, executive, administrative, accounting, clerical, stenographic, public service and similar uses. Research uses shall not involve heavy testing operations of any kind or product manufacturing of such a nature to create noise, vibration or emissions of a nature offensive to the overall purpose of this district. The L-O District is designed to act as a buffer between other more intense non- residential uses and high density residential uses, and is thus a transitional use. Connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer System of the City of Meridian is a requirement in this district. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 4 • • 13. That the allowed uses in the C-G and L-O Districts are listed in 11-2-409, and such are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 14. That proper notice has been given as required by law and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission have been followed. COivTCI~US I aNS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicants' property. 2. That the City has the authority to take judicial notice of its own ordinances, other governmental statues and ordinances, testimony that has been previously presented, and of actual conditions existing within the City and state. 3. That the City of Meridian has authority to place conditions upon granting a zoning amendment. 4. That the City has judged this Application for a zoning amendment upon the basis of guidelines contained in Section 11-2- 416 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and upon the basis of the Local Planning Act of 1975, Title 67 Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, and the record submitted to it and the things of which it can take judicial notice. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 5 • • 5. That the uses allowed in the C-G district are substantially more intensive than those allowed in the L-O district; that the Meridian zoning Ordinance allows only the listed allowed uses to be conducted in that zone. 6. That since there are various proposed uses on the land requested to be rezoned, including residential, retail, cabinetry, and offices, which are not allowed uses in all zones. i.e., residential uses are not allowed in the General Retail and Service Commercial district, it makes logical sense to zone for each proposed use rather than establish one zone that allows many intensive land uses, which may not be able to be controlled by the City; the concern of the City is that there is potential problem in zoning the property General Retail and Service Commercial and allow the proposed uses ;:nder that zone, but then have those uses change or fail and be replaced by more intensive uses allowed under that C--G zoning. 7. That it is concluded that measures need to be taken to allow the proposed uses, but limit the possibility of more intensive uses later. 8. That it is therefore concluded that the property should be rezoned to allow the uses set forth in the representations of the Applicants, but to deny the request to zone the entire parcel of property as General Retail and Service Commercial; that it is concluded that the .41 of an acres property to be used as a home and book store and cabinetry business should be divided and the parcel to~used as a residence zoned R-8, Residential, with the lot FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSI02JS OF LAW Page 6 • • meeting the lot requirements of that zone; that the remaining portion of the .41 of an acre to be used by the Sciscoe's as a book store and cabinetry business should be zoned C-C, Community Business District; that the 7.21 acres to be used for professional offices shall be zoned L-O, Limited Office. 9. That 11-2-416 (K) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian sets forth standards under which the City shall review applications for zoning amendments; that upon a review of those requirements and a review of the facts presented and conditions of the area, the Planning and Zoning Commission specifically concludes as follows: (a) The new zoning would be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and no Comprehensive Plan amendment is required; that the house has been on the property for a substantial length of time and can be allowed to continue even though the remainder of t:.~ property is zoned to commercial and limited office uses. (b) The area included in the application is not intended to be rezoned in the future, but is included in the Comprehensive Plan as a mixed and planned use area. (c) The area around the proposed zoning amendment is developed in a single family residential, multi-family residential, vacant land fashion, and substantial commercial Farther to the south and the new zoning would not be contrary to the existing uses. The land is shown in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a Mixed/Planned Use Development area. (d) There has been a change in the area which may dictate that the land should be rezoned, that change being its designation in the Comprehensive Plan. (e) No specific information was submitted by the Applicant regarding design, construction, operation, and overall plan for the land; that such information will have to be submitted and development controlled under a FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 7 • • design review process. (f) The proposed use should not be hazardous or disturbing to the existing or future uses of the neighborhood, if the conditions set forth herein are complied with. (g) The property will be able to be adequately served with public facilities, and connection to municipal sewer and water is required. (h) The proposed uses would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. (i) The proposed uses should not involve any detrimental activity to any person's property or the general welfare. (j) Development may cause an increase in vehicular traffic and this problem would have to be addressed in the design of the area. (k) That this rezone will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any natural or scenic feature of major importance. (1) The proposed zoning amendment should be in the best interest of City of Meridian and the area if conditions were placed on the land and the applicant. 10. That if the property to be zoned C-N is adjacent to the property owned by Doris Baret and there will be paved parking adjacent or near her property, the design standards for off-street parking in 11-2 414 must be met, specifically including the fencing; that such design standards shall have to be met where ever the parking is located; if the Baret property will be adjacent to the home of the Sciscoe's fencing will be up to the parties involved. 11. That the Applicants, as a condition of the rezone, shall be required to meet the requirements of the 35 foot landscaped set FINDINGS OF FACT & COiv`CLUSIONS 0~' LAW Page 8 • • back along Meridian Roaa. 12. That the Applicants must meet all of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and all of the requirements of the Ada County Highway District. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS CF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS p~'r`Gi~~S The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby ~e~tse~ these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER VOTED COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE VOTED COMMISSIONER SHEARER VOTED COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI VOTED CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DECISION ~°..ND RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that the rezone Application be approved as modified above. It is further recommended that if the Applicants do not agree with these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law teat the Application be denied. MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS Gr LAW Page 9 ...,.y ....~ ; • • .fr,~r'' 't';4~4 Planning & Zoning January il, 1994 Page 2 Johnson: Moved and seconded to approve the minutes with the corrections so stated, all in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #1: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR REZONE REQUEST BY DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND MIKE SCISCOE: TABLED AT DECEMBER 14, 1993 MEETING: Johnson: Any discussion regarding the Findings of Fact as prepared by our City Attorney. Rountree: Since the meeting between the developer and Wayne it appears that they have agreed to the suggestion that we made ta' down scale zoning. I think that would require a change in the Findings of Fact and I put that forth for consideration. I believe we will have to change the Findings of Fact because it speaks of Commercial General. Crookston: That is correct, the concern that I have is having the rezone either totally as CG or totally as CN and still have a residence in there. Under our Ordinances that is not allowed. Something either needs to be done either the applicant needs to request that the residence be zoned some type of residence, residential. The R-40 doesn't align with the density of the single family dwelling. That just needs to be worked how that is going to be done. The other concern about even if we could zone the whole thing as CG or CN is that in the event that it is zoned that way then the applicant occupies the .house for a period of time and then says well I'm going to move my business, then you still have the property zoned as CG or CN and than a totally more intensive use goes in that we wouldn't have any input into. I think that is a concern. Johnson: What is your suggestion on how we work that out? Crookston: I think that needs to be addressed with the applicant, and see whether or not, from his testimony he said he was going live in the house. So, we need to sit down with the applicant and see what a proper residential district to rezone the property to would be. Rountree: Did you discuss that with him Wayne? Forrey: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, we are aware of this dilemma. Mr. and Mrs. Sciscoe are here, and one of the things I think we can do in the Ordinance is look at a Conditional Use Permit for maybe a portion of the use of that property within thee ^• \' } • • ~:~' • Planning & Zoning January il, 1994 Page 3 Commercial Neighborhood zone. It might be one way to alleviate that and put some time constraints. So if the property changes hands we are not locked into a higher intensity use occupying that home again. And the Sciscoe's have agreed to look at a Conditional Use Permit type of arrangement. Johnson: What is your thinking on that Tim? Hepper: Yes Crookston: You are saying Conditional Use for the house Forrey: For the home Crookston: For the home .and with a CN designation for the entire parcel? Forrey: Correct, including the Dorado portion as well not just the Sciscoe but the Dorado property. Crookston: I think we need to have an amendment to the application. Or at least an indication that they are applying for that or amending their application to that effect. Forrey: Mr. Chairman, would a development agreement be appropriate? Johnson: That would work. Forrey: Ok, something of that nature. Rountree: Would it require another hearing? Crookston: No. Johnson: Thanks Wayne. Rountree: Would that be stipulated in Findings of Facts or table it until we get the amendment? Hepper: I think we need to know if the owners are willing to do that. Crookston: They need to sign something to indicate that is what they want to do. If I receive that I can proceed with the Findings. So we can have them next meeting. Johnson: Okay, well then let's get together and do that. Anything else on that item? a I • • .;1 Planning & Zoning January 11, 1994 Page 4 Shearer: We need a motion to table those Findings. Johnson: We need a motion to table it because its on the agenda. Shearer: Can Wayne prepare findings without a motion? Johnson: Well, he already has that motion to prepare Findings of Fact at the last meeting. Shearer: Are you sure? It seems like we sent that back to review. Johnson: No, that is why its on there for Findings of Fact. Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I move we table this item until the next regularly scheduled meeting. -- Hepper: Second Johnson: Moved and seconded to table this until the next regular meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #2: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR KING STREET STATION SUBDIVISION BY D.J. INVESTMENTS AND BRIGGS ENGINEERING: Johnson: Is there discussion concerning these Findings of Facts? Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I have a~question, the Findings state that these units need to have 2 car garages per unit, if the developer decides to go that way it appears that it may be a major re-draw or re-design of that and I'm wondering if we need to see that or find out if it is feasible for him to do that, if it is what kind of, how its going to effect the overall project. Johnson: At present the Ordinance requires, as I understand it, the 2 car garage because these are plotted as single family dwelling units, are they not? So they require a variance for that Ordinance. Hepper: I'm just wondering what that requirement Johnson: And you want to know whether or not that is feasible. Hepper: I'm wondering if the developer, if that is something he can work with or if he is going to have to re-design this whole project and maybe we need to start over on this thing if he is going to have to re-design the whole thing or should we just go • Lum Amount: $ 45.00 S C H E D II L E- A Order No.: ST-92037425 PW Policy No.: 0-9993-67306 Date of Policy: JUNE 25, 1993 at 4:53 p.m. Amount of Insurance: $ 10,000.00 1. Name of Insured: ROBERT R. ANGELL AND LARRY D. STEVENS 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this Policy is: FEE SIMPLE 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at the date of policy vested in: ROBERT R. ANGELL, a married man, and LARRY D. STEVENS, a married man 4. The land referred to in this Policy is situate in State of IDAHO, County of ADA: PARCEL III COMMENCING at the section corner common to Sections 6 and 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, and Sections 1 and 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian thence North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 2141.22 feet to a point on the section line and on the center line of North Meridian Road, thence North 89 degrees 34'30" East, 30.00 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of-Way of said North Meridian Road, thence North 88 degrees 43'49" East, 328.22 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 83 degrees 49'27" East, 129.18 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 88 degrees 48'37" East, 389.26 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 31 degrees 03'37" East, 414.88 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 88 degrees 34'59" West, 1057.50 feet to a 1/2 inch -1- Owner's Schedule A ~~ ~ • S9F~. yo' i v~ ~. w i !e ~ • . MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 2993 PAGE 7 Corrie: I would like it stated that the minimum square footage should be 1350 sq. ft. Crookston: They have the option allows a mix. to go~under the Ordinance that Corrie: Thank you. Discussion on squat^e footages - see tape. Giesle-^: In the Ordinance, I would like those manufactured homes to go under design review before they are approved. The Motion was made by Yet^rington and seconded by Tolsma to apps^ove the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law with stipulations to include 1350 squal^e foot home minimum, two caT^ gat^age and design review. Kingsford: I'll appoint two Council members to be on the design t^eview board, Bob Giesler and Hob Corrie. Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Gieslet^ - Yea; Corrie - Yea; Tolsma - Vea; Motion Carried: All Yea: The Motion was made by Cot^rie and seconded by Tolsma to have the attorney pt^epare an Ordinance annexing and zoning Conifer Subdivision. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #~: 'FINDINGS DF FACT AND CDNCLUSIONS OF LAW: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST BY HIMERICH AND DORADO DEVELOPMENT: The Motion was made by Corrie and seconded by Yei^rington to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as prepared. Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Giesler - Yea; Cot^t^ie - Yea; Tolsma - Yea; Motion Cart^i ed : Al 1 Yea ~ ~ • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1993 PAGE 8 The Motion was made by Yet^rington and seconded by Tolsma to have the attorney prepare an Or~dinance annexing and zoning Himerich and Dorado Development. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #3: ORDINANCE #601: VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR MICHELS AND MICHELS: Kingsfor^d: AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF DORIS SUBDIVISION, OF RECORD IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, SPECIFICALLY THE EASEMENTS LOCATED BETWEEN LOT 1 AND BLOCK ~ DORIS SUBDIVI5ION, LOT 1 AND 3 BLOCK ~, DORIS SUBDIVISION, AND LOT 2 AND 3 BLOCK 2 DORIS SUBDIVISION, MERIDIAN, IDAHO, ACCORDING~TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, IN BOOK 16 OF PLATS AT PAGE 1080, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone present who wishes Ordinance #601 read in it's entir^ety? No response. The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Yerrington that the r^ules and pr^ovisions of 50-902 and all ra~les and provisions requiring that Ordinance be read on three differ^ent days be dispensed with and that Ordinance #601 be passed and approved. Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Giesler - Yea; Corrie - Yea; Tolsma - Yea; Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #5: WATER AND SEWER DELINQUENCIES: Kingsford: This is to inform you in wt^iting, if you choose to, you have the right to a pre-determination hearing at 7:30 P. M., 06101/93 before the Mayor^ and City Council, to appear in person to be .judged on the facts and defend the claim made by the City that your^ water^, sewer^, ti^ash bill is delinquent. You may retain Counsel. This service will be discontinued on June 16, 1993 unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone from the public that would 1 ike to contest their water^, sewer, trash delinquency? No response. The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Yer^rington to appr^ove of the turn off list. Motion Carried: All Yea: s • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 16, 1993 PAGE 13 Kingsfor^d: The front half of it is. Arnold: Well it's been there quite a while hasn't it? Kingsford: It's only been there four or five year^s. Thank you we appreciate your concerns. Anyone else to testify? No r^esponse. I will close the public hearing. Counselor, is that differ^ent testimony than appeared at Planning and Zoning? Crookston: I think the conflict between the two ordinances, it was addr^essed in the Findings but there was no solution given at the Planning and Zoning level. That needs to be remedied. I would have to review the Findings again to see if they are basically the same. - The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Corrie to have the attorney review and amend the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #5: PUBLIC HEARING: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST BY HIMERICH AND DORADO DEVELOPMENT: Kingsford: At this time I will open the Public Hearing. Is then^e an owner or representative present to testify? Jeff Huber, 52Q-9 lin-audible) Way, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Huber: I am here tonight representing Dorado Development. We have requested annexation and a rezone for approximately 7.6 acres on N. Meridian Road. As per your Planning Departments r^equest we have included the house parcel where Mrs. Himerich lives in our request now. Our rezone request is for R-40 with a r^estrictive covenant for 25 units per acre. We found that R-15 was not quite dense enough for us to build a project like this and provide the amenities that we'd like to provide and we found that R-4i~t was to dense but 25 units per acre with a restrictive covenant on the R-40 would work well for us. The site we feel is located close to the downtown which is a good location for multi- family housing. It's close to the shopping and we feel that it would work well both for the City and for our project. tPresented drawings and explained to Council - see tape) Our • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 18, 1993 RAGE 14 ingr^ess and egress will be taken off of James Court and off of Meridian Raad, we've been working with the property owner to the north for an access point her^e - shown on map. We can easily access off into James Court should that become a Collector. We're working with ACRD and the Hunemiller project to the south of us. We've agreed to participate equally in the creation of a Collector 5tr^eet. I have been speaking with the attorney for James Court, although he has not got a firm answer from his clients yet. I believe we can pr^ovide a nice Collector here. After we dedicate the easement that ACRD will need for right of way we'll end up with about C,.4 acres which if our rezone is approved would give us approximately 16~ units maximum. We would phase that in two phases starting next summer. First phase will be approximately 8Q1 units and approximately 80 in the near future. We would request that you apps^ove the rezone and the annexation tonight and if yotr have any questions I'd be happy to answer them. Giesler: You say that you've built this type of project in Boise, could you give me the names of those please? Huber: We're building this particular project at the corner of Ustick and Five Mile Road and it's called West Ridge Apar^tments. These at^e going to be high end, upscale apartments with lots of amenities. Giesler^: Yau don't have anything completed in Boise at this time? Huber: No. The Cherry Lane Apar^tments here we have built. Giesler: Could you tell me what the square footage of these units ar^e going to be and the price range? Huber: I'd like Mr^. Angel to address those particular questions. Tol sma: Questioned dr^awing. that go around this project? These ar^e all ACRD public streets Huber: Correct. Tolsma: How would the people feel about having their garages across the street fr^om the apartment their living in? Huber: Ther^e are carports and garages. This is a conceptual plan. texplained - see tape) • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 18, 1993 PAGE 1~ Corrie: The roads on the inside it shows here will not be dedicated ACRD roadways. Huber: No. Corrie: 5o in other wor^ds if we have a fire in there, people are pal^ked in then^e, we can't get the trucks in there, there' s nothing we can do about it. Huber: No then^e will be an access here and two access here. tShown on drawing) This plan has been approved by the Boise Fire Department and I believe would meet any standat^d that the Meridian Fir^e Department would wish there. Corrie: We've run into problems with parking. We can't regulate the parking in there. Concerns about roads not being dedicated. Huber^: We would wish to come back to you with our final plan and have that approved by your Fire Department. Crookston: If I remember correctly Mr. Huber, you indicated at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting that the pool and I think you mentioned one other amenity would be completed in the first phase. Huber: That's correct. Crookston: What total amenities would be included in that fir^st phase? Huber^: We'd put all of the amenities in the first phase. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Bob Angel, 35 Horizon Drive, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Angel: I'll be happy to take any questions on specifics if you'd 1 ike. Giesler: Are you involved in the project that he spoke about at IJstick and Five Mile? Angel: Yes sir. • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 18, 1993 RAGE 16 Giesler: My other q~iestions were the square footage of the apartments and the price range and whether there basically a low income apartment. Angel: They ar^e not a low income apartment. The average unit mix is going to be split as follows: First phase would be 80 units of which the mix would be approximately 50X - one bedroom units, 40X - two beds^oom units and 8 - 3 bedroom units which would represent approximately 10X. The square footage of the one bedroom units are around 700 Sq. feet. Our two bedroom units of which then^e are two floor plans will average about 925 square feet and our three bedroom apartments will be 1075 square feet. The anticipated rental ranges for the one bedroom units will be in the area of 3500.00 per month. The two bedroom units will aver^age around 6575.00 to 5600.00 with the two floor plans, and the three bedroom units will be at 5700.00 per month. Kingsfor^d: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Doris Bat^rett, 7920 W. Apache, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Bat^rett: (presented each Council member with handout) We just r^ecently purchased the proper^ty at 2250 N. Meridian Rd., which is .just north of the complex that is being discussed tonight. I have several concerns. First of all when we wer^e in the process of purchasing the property that we currently own, we were told that this was going to be a development of single level, single family dwellings. Not until probably one to two days before closing did I contact M1^. Forrey and he advised me that it was going to be an apartment complex. I've got sever^al concerns, one is, is that I have spoke with Jeff Huber he does want to purchase a portion of our proper^ty to make an existing road down through, you know to access his apartments. We have not come to any conclusion of that and I've not made any decision. I'm not sure I want a roadway running adjacent to our property. I'm concerned that as you look at your drawing, the portion I've highlighted, that then^e be a proper screen, hopefully a block wall of at least six foot. The thought of putting some speed bumps to slow down the traffic a little bit. Jeff Huber again has advised us that the cat^ports were going to be on the outer sur^rounding area of that project which I guess is okay. I feel that the density is extremely high. We have a ditch and I'm asking that that be tiled. I do have concerns about the project. I did ask for a conceptual drawing and 1 have not receive that. Giesler: Whet^e is this ditch located that yo~ir concerned about having tiled? • • MER I D I AI-t C I TY COUIVC I L MAY 18, 1993 PAGE 17 Bart^ett: It's located right along this property line. Actually it's running along this property line - shown on map. Giesler^: It's not on your property, it's on theirs? Bai^rett : I' m not sure. Kingsford: We do have a requirement in the City that all ditches be tiled, so it is an Ordinance we would deal with. How many acres is your property? Parrett : 3 acres. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Jeff Huber: I have met with Mrs. Barrett and 1 have assured her that we would do proper screening around the entire project as well as take some extra care around where her house adjoins the property. Het^ house is rather large and her garage actually sits closest to our project and I think that there isn't going to be any more noise ct^eated from our pi^oject than is on Meridian Road. We are more than willing to the the ditches and work with Mrs. Barrett in any way we can to alleviate any concerns she has. The garages that will be on our pt^oject will be solid garages facing the outside and where we have an open parking area thet^e will be a six foot fence between there. Corrie: How far along are you on the West Ridge Apartments? Huber: Their about 4QIX complete right now. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Pecky Bowcutt: Briggs Engineering, 1111 S. Orchard, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Bowcutt: I'm here on behalf of the developers to the south. As you know this has been an on-going thing concerning James Court, which is currently private road and future access to the interioi^ of this section. One of your main concerns is that access be provided to that interior because they don't have adequate access except far some linkage up to Blue Heron Lane, which is also private. I have provided a new drawing for Mr. Angel and Mr. Hubei^. The on e. that was discussed at a previous Council Meeting • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 18, 1993 PAGE 18 showed a little curvature to the road to give it a non-continuous Collector type look which ACRD prefers. But after discussing it with them, they were concerned about the width on their parcel and asked us to bear a little additional right of way, so we did revise our plan. We did not loose ,any units, we just went straight out and are bearing 30 feet. I talked with Mr. Sale at ACRD this morning he said 60 feet of right of way will be sufficient to provide a Collector for that interior. Basically I know there are probably some concerns about the density of this project to the north, however one thing that you need to take into consideration is the over^all density for that particular vicinity. What you've got there with the James Court Apartments is approximately 58 units, they are on 5.834 acres. Then what we are proposing to the south of this project is 72 units on 5.89 acres and then they have, according to ACHD it's 7. 4. If you take the units that they at^e proposing, the units that we are proposing to the south, the existing units of James Court, your density is around lE~ units to the acre. One reason is, like our particular development is only going to be ic^.~2 dwelling units per acre because we've had to decrease it due to the necessary t^ight of way for the Collector. When you take a look at that and look at that vicinity, the ~5 units per acre density that they are proposing, in reality would not translate into that if you look at the adjacent parcels with the similar type development either proposed or existing. We'd like you to basically consider the application and vote to approve it. We think that this particular area will benefit because that will translate into that Collector being built. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Craig Rhom, 330 Cranmer, was swo-^n by the attorney. Rhom: When does the public get to see the draft? How can we get our hands on it to look at before a bunch of leg work is done and approved so we can voice our opposition to it. Kingsford: It's a concept drawing so fat^ they are not .completed so certainly they are not tied to that. As soon as those things have been submitted to us they will be available het^e at City Hall. Rhom: Is there a certain time after this hearing that it will be available? MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 18, 1993 PAGE 1~ Kingsford: It's just an annexation and zoning request at this point. As soon as they get ready to do their project there then we'd have those available. Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Greg Pond, c^t8 Ci^anmer Drive, was sworn , by the attorney. Hond: We do have some concerns being in the other subdivision across the way, about traffic on Meridian Road. We would like to see as little density along that road as possible. Concerns stated about values of homes being decreased and additional traffic. Kingsford: Anyone else? No response. I will close the public hearing. Counselor is there a difference in the testimony? Crookston: Thei^e are not but there might be some changes that we need to make on the Conclusions and the requirements that pertain to the garages and the screening. The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Corrie to have the attorney review and prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on this request for annexation and zoning. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #6: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZDNING TO R-8 WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT, PHEASANT POINTE SUBDIVISION: Kingsford: At this time I'll open the Public Hearing and invite the owner or representative to begin. Jim Merkle, Hubble Engineering, was sworn by the attorney. Merkle: This annexation application and preliminary plat application is proposed for the southwest corner of Locust Grove. Locust Grove on the east and Ustick on the north. To the south of us is the Tt^act Subdivision. We are contiguous with the City corporate limits along this piece of property which is known as the Borup parcel tshown on map). We are proposing R-8 zoning for the entire 44 acres. That is consistent with the existing zoning of the Tract Subdivision to the south and additional subdivisions on the east side of Locust Grove in this area. This proposed subdivision contains 92 single family residential lots on approximately 27 1/2 acres which gives you a density of • • MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING MAY 11, 1993 PAGE 3 The Motion was made by Hepper and seconded by Shearer^ that the Met^idian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Roll Call Uote: Hepper^ - Yea; Rountr^ee - Yea; Shear^er - Yea; Al id.jani - Yea; Motion Carried: All Yea: The Motion was made by Hepper and seconded by Shearer that the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning requested by the applicant, for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and that the applicants be specifically required to the all ditches, canals and water^ways as a condition of annexation, and that the applicants meet all the Or^dinances of the City of Meridian specifically including the development time requirements. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #5: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST HY HIMERICH AND DORADO DEVELOPMENT: Johnson: Any discussion? No response. The Motion was made by Rountree and seconded by Shearer^ that the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and apps^oves these Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law. Roll Call Vote: Hepper - Yea; Rountree - Yea; Shear^er - Yea; Al id.jani - Yea; Motion Carried: All Yea: The Motion was made by Rountree and seconded by Shearer that the Mer^idian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning requested by the applicant for the party described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law in compliance with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Motion Car^ri ed : Al 1 Yea: * ~ • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 13, 1993 PAGE 6 Hepper: Is there any landscaping or anything like that proposed? Loveless: Not with the subdivision. Hepper: Over by the main school it shows a pretty large parking area, will that parking be included in there? Loveless: We drew that up to show that we can provide enough space on that site to provide a parking lot for the square footage that exists within that building. Johnson: Do you have any concept regarding the ultimate use of the lots? The application states combination of use. Loveless: We anticipate under the R-15 zone probably a potential multi-family development or some sort. We have no plans for one at this stage now. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Bill Brewer, 105 E. Carlton Ave., was sworn by the attorney. Brewer: As many of you know our property consists of a mortuary across the street. We've been at that location since 1957 and I go have an on going interest in what occurs with the school property over there. In watching and keeping up with the property I still cannot help but believe that the greatest potential for that property would be that it remain in one piece. A nice large piece of property that could truly be usable for something down the road. (Further explanation - see tape) Johnson: Anyone else? No response. I will close the Public Hearing. (Discussion Held - see tape) The Motion was made by Hepper to approve the preliminary plat - motion died for lack of 2nd. To be scheduled for next Planning and Zoning Meeting. ITEM #6: PUBLIC HEARING: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST BY HIMERICH & DORADO DEVELOPMENT: Johnson: I will open the Public Hearing. Is there someone representing the applicant? • • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING APRIL 13, 1993 PAGE 7 Jeff Huber, 1109 Leadville Ave., Boise, representin g Dorado Development, was sworn by the attorney. Huber: We have an application before you tonight to annex and rezone some property on Meridian Road. We're not asking for specific approval tonight. There was so~he confusion in the staff report as to the site plan fitting the property. It's a conceptual plan that we added to our application to show the City what we had in mind for that particular piece of property. Another item in Mr. Smith's comments in your staff report referred to the annexation of the house parcel on the property. This is an oversight on our part and we'd be more than happy to add that to the annexation prior to the City Council Hearing. We envisions a lot of growth in Meridian occurring over the next few years and we envision a need for multi-family housing. We'd like to build a project here that Meridian would be proud of. (Presented pictures to Commission Members) We're requesting that we receive a zoning designation of R-40 with a restrictive covenant for 25 units per acre instead of 40 per acre. In order for use to build a quality project like this with all these amenities, we plan to have a basketball court, a volleyball court, a swimming pool, and playground s for children (Explained further - see tape) -In order for us to build a quality project like this we need a higher density than the R-15 would allow and we don't need the density that an R-40 would allow. So we are requesting that the developer enter into a development agreement with the City that we would be restricted to a maximum of 25 unit s per acre. Johnson: On this conceptual, it looks almost identical to the N. Five Mile. Huber: It is. It's the very same plan that we are using over there. We are working with the Ada County Highway District regarding the Collector Street now and the adjoining property owners. Ultimately I think the decision will be up to the Ada County Commission's. If we cannot locate a Collector there we would access this project off of Meridian Road. Are there any questions? Hepper: Is this the concept of what you have in mind out there or is this actually what you plan on doing? Huber: This is actually what we would plan on doing but at this present time we're not asking for conditional use approval. We are sharing with you a concept of what we want to build there. • • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING APRIL 13, 1993 PAGE 8 Hepper: How many units would be involved? Huber: At 25 per acre, we would be in the neighborhood of 175 units. Hepper: Would you build to that density to the 25 per acre? Huber: Once the Collector issue is settled we would have to lay it out and I don't think that we quite get to that density. Hepper: Would you do this in phases or all at one time? Huber: I think I'd have to defer that question to Dorado Development for that. I think we might phase it depending on the demand, in two phases maximum. Hepper: Do you have an idea on the time frame of those phases? Huber: Mr. Angel from Dorado Development will address those issues. Johnson: Any other questions for Mr. Huber? To clarify your earlier comment then, your agreeable to some sort of restriction imposed by the City to the 25 density or less per acre. Huber: Yes. Johnson: Anyone else from the public? Robert R. Angel, 35 Horizon Drive, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Angel: There were a couple of questions with regard to the phasing or the density that maybe I could answer. Our company came to Meridian a little bit over a year and a half ago and constructed what we call the Cherry Lane Apartments. We felt that the one thing that maybe would be lacking would be a top flight apartment project with amenities. We are also aware of the fact that it is a small market, the multi family market is very strong as everybody knows all over the Treasure Valley. For a project in this size we had contemplated doing it in two phases. We would go ahead and put in all our improvements. The first phase not less than 75 to 80 units. The second phase would be the balance of the property. In terms of timeliness, I would say not later than spring of 1994 to begin construction. Any questions? • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION -APRIL 13, 1993 PAGE 9 Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? • Raleigh Hawe, 530 Blue Heron Lane, was sworn by the attorney. Howe: I own the property to the east of this development and I have no adverse comments about the designs that are being proposed. However I am interested in the proposed Collector that is an east west Collector on the south side of this particular property. As I have testified in the meetings prior to this on the properties to the south of there conceptual project here I find it a necessity to have a Collector through that area to serve the properties to the east and to connect to the streets adjoining my easterly boundaries of my property. With the numbers of people that are in this particular area and are proposed to be in this area, a Collector for the services that are required for this particular project and the ones adjacent to it including these properties to the east for fire services, emergency services and traffic movement, the Collector area should be a required situation in that particular area. That Collector will serve the Willowbrook Street and I believe it's now called Blue Heron Street on the east side of the properties that I have. This service of course will involve not only the general services of emergency, the fire, police, etc. but it will serve the traffic movement to Meridian Road. Are there any questions? Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Larry Sale, 318 E. 37th Street, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Sale: I'm the development .services supervisor for the Ada County Highway District. In our review of this application and the review of the previous application by Bridgewood Subdivision, which is just immediately east of this parcel the Highway District imposed a condition for the preparation of the traffic study between these two properties and the dedication of a Collector standard street from Meridian Road to the East boundary of these properties. On behalf of the Commission, I urge your inclusions of our recommendations in your Findings and pass those on to the City Council for their consideration. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? No response. I will close the Public Hearing. The Motion was made by Johnson and seconded by Alidjani to have the attorney prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Motion Carried: All Yea: 9. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that the Applicant shall be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer; that the property will be subject to Site Planning Review and the Subdivision and Development Ordinance. 10. That since ~he Applicant's property is in the NORTH CURVE NEIGHBORHOOD of the Comprehensive Plan, the annexation would be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and the requested Zoning would be since the land is within the Urban Service Planning Area. 11. Therefore, based on the Application, these Findings of Fact and Conclusions, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, it is ultimately concluded that Applicant's property could be annexed and zoned, as requested. 12. That the property shall be zoned R-40 but shall be subject to de-annexation if a density of greater than 25 units per acre is exceeded; this limitation is a condition of annexation and development. 13. That all ditches, canals, and waterways shall be tiled as a condition of annexation and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de-annexation.. 14. That the requirements of the irrigation districts and Ada County Highway District shall be met as well the requirements of the City Engineer. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - PAGE 6 ~ • APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE COMMISSIONER SHEARER COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) ' VOTED--~~ VOTE D-_ ~~~ VOTED VOTED VOTED DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and compliance with the Qrdinance of the City of Meridian. MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - PAGE 7 •HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNgL M~IBERS OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live RONAIDRTOLSMA WILLIAM G.BERG,JR.,CityClerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer RIDIAN CITY OF ME MAXNGTON RoBL~r~.DDRRIE WALT W. MORROW GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, water works supt. 33 EAST IDAHO WAYNES. FORREY, AICP Planner 6jfJtti~pAdmimatfatOr JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 _ JItMdOHNSO" W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief PhORe (208) 888.4433 • FAX (?A8) 887813 Chairmen-Flaming d Zoning WAYNE G. GROOKSTON, JR:, Attorney public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor FACSIMILE COVER SHEET DATE: ~ / DELIVER FAX TO: ~~ /~ TITLE/DEPARTMENT: RECEIVING FAX NUMBER: TIME: % t r~~ S ~-/o~'~ CONFIDENTIAL: YES NO TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: FROM CITY OF MERIDIAN - FAX NUMBER (208) 887-4813 NAME: ~/-~ /'/r ~~/ f~S TITLE/DEPARTMENT: PHONE NUMBER: ~~ ~~ ENTS: P~~' L~~vP ~'~ ~L COMM ~~ ~ , i ~ ~ ~,7 ~~~s: /r f!'ii ~~ PLEASE CALL IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL FAX TRANSACTIONS SUCCESSFULLY. • • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Auril 19. 1994 APPLICANT: MIKE AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 16 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING• VARIANCE REQUEST AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: ~ ~ ~ ~.~~~ CITY POLICE DEPT: "REVIEWED" CITY FIRE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY~STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: ~UB OF TREASURE VALLEY • OFFICIALS A GOOd PIKE LO LIVE COUNCIL MEMBERS WILLIAM G.BERG,JR.,CityClerk /~.~ j RONALD R. TOLSMA MAXYERRINGTON JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer / ' ` ITY OF MERIDIAN ROBERT D. CORRIE GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer `/ WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief " MERIDIAN, IDAHO $3642 - Planner & Zoning Administrator GORDON, Police Chief W.L. "BILL JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (2O8) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 88713813 Chairman ~ Planning & Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD , Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, may we have your answer by: April 12 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/30/94 HEARING DATE: 4/19/94 REQUEST: Variance Regluest BY: Mike and Cynthia Sciscoe LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: 2210 N Meridian Road, portion of Lots 3 ~ 4 of J.E. Pfost's Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORR1E, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: • CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E. IDAHO AVE. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 VARIANCE APPLICATION (RE: Meridian Zoning Ordinance) NAME : l~~ l,L~ f. `t j~ JCl S ONE (Owner or h lder of valid option) ADDRESS : ~a~r~ ti. ~{~!'/[li(~i~ ~OG4 GENERAL LOCATION:_pQ/'f ~n O~~S 3 f y G~~C ~.~~ ~C1~rUl~/Ol-, LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: SPP ~ ~Clt~ PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR VALID OPTION: A copy of your property deed or option agreement must be attnached. PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION C; ~~~ esf~d VICINITY SKETCH: A vicinity map at a scale approved by the City showing property lines, streets existing and proposed zoning and such other items as the City may require. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS: 'A list of all property owners and addresses within contiguoug to, directly across the street from, and within a 300' radius of the parcel(s) proposed for a Variance must be attached. (This information is available from the County Assessor) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE: _ U~/'/t~/~~ f0 ~,il'Of~l ~PS//~/-C~ SIGNATURE: CITY COUNCIL RECORDS Date Received Received By City Council Hearing Date • • EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETU AND MADE A PART HEREON Tt1AT CERTAIN DEED OF TRUST DATED DECE1~'IBER 7, .1993. PLEASE INITIAL A PORT{ON OF LOTS 3lATS ATOPAGE P470, RECOROSIOF ADAM COUNTYrNDAHOTDE CRIBED AS OF, FILED IN BOOK 4 OF P FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMO RTH RANGIEN WESTD, BO SE MERID ANORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS t AND 12, 70WNSHIP 3 NO , THENCE NORTH 00 OEGREE 25' 3F NORTH MER D AN~ OAD41 22 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SECTION LINE AND ON THE CENTERLINE 0 THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 34' 30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH STEEL PIN WITH A PLASTIC CAR ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID NOR?H MERIDIAN ROAD, THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREE 25' 30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 42.15 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF NORTH MEDEGREES 43'~16AIEAST A D STANC OF ~L02O EETO O A /2 NCH STEEL PIN WITH THENCE SOUTH 89 A PLASTIC CAP, THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREE 53' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 131.03 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH STEEL PIN WIT A PLASTIC CAP, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 26' 27" WEST A DISTANCE OF 136.06 FEET TO A 1 /2 fNCH STEEL PIN WITH A PLASTIC CAP ON ~ 25A30" WEST ALDIS ANCE OFA35 00 FEET (SHOWN ON RECORD OF THENCE NORTH 00 DEGR SURVEY RECORDED UNDER INSTRUM F WAYOOF NORTH MERIODIAN ROADT O THE REAL POINT OF 33.00 FEET) ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT 0 BEGINNING. I' ~ ~ I+e{L~RI D 1/~ `~ iR~'z~~~ • ~~, I ,~r~r. \ ~m.r.. ~ • \~, i J.B. PFOST'S~• '""~"' I • ~ nrr~ar a "~. MIM/NM I ~ \ m~rrm ~ •. ~. I \~ ~7U1t1f 7C.c ri~~ \.~•, I ~ ~w» m~rw+w SIIHDIYISION \ \\r J h MtS~ CT. CPrit/111ta~ `'~ ~~ a Y ~\ p~r• 'ys ~r~c~geWoo~ -; CK• rn~r~ru ~4~°- C PJr c ~ os eon ~ ~\ ~ 4,4~~ '~ \~~ ~'~~ ~~~ - mirw ~ ' DRIB ~~ m m r 2. 2 •\ •\ ~\ •' ~ Z W Z rMwr~ ` ~ ~~tE ~ STRE,E,T ``` nruwr riurr~ _ ~ ~ ~ `~ `- - - Q ~-T 1-1 ~'. ~-I : ~--~1 W : i ~ vn~ww OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GOROON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney •HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • COUNCIL MEMBERS A GOOd PIaCe t0 L1Ve RONALO R. TOLSMA CITY OF MERIDIAN WALTW.MORROW 33 EAST IDAHO sHARI snLEs MERIDIAN, IDAH083642 ~E~;~~~~~0e1ngAdministrator MJOHNSON Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 APR Chairman • Planning 8 Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 i" 13 ~ ~ ~s9~ GRANT P. KINGSFORD C~~r`, V ~, aYdic~~P.3tf~j;,! Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH 1rHE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, may we have your answer by: April 12 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/30/94 HEARING DATE: 4/19/94 REQUEST: Variance Request BY: Mike and Cynthia Sciscoe LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: 2210 N Meridian Road, portion of Lots 3 ~ 4 of J.E. Pfost's Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES ~ / / ~ A , OTHER: `~ 7 7 YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Ji~~-1 ~ ~`i f ,aJ ~' 7 /3 s-t1 CE. /mar ~' ~~~~'S ~,. i • • S~ SCo ~ ORDINANCE NO.~! Y(~- ~_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT TAE SECTION CORIJER COMMON TO SECTIONS 6 AND 7 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN,. ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to amend and change the zoning from R-40, High Density Residential to C-C, Community Business, for the described parcel in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the aforementioned real property which is described as follows: Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 6 and 7 Township 3 North, Range 1 East, and Sections 1 and 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, thence North 00°25'30" West, 2141.22 feet to a point on the section line and on the center line of North Meridian Road, thence North 89°34'30" East, 30.00 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of- Way of said North Meridian Road, thence South 00°25'30" East, 42.15 feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road, said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, thence South 89°43'16" East, 135.02 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 00°53'00" East, 131.03 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, REZONE ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT Page 1 ~. • thence South 00°53'00" West .174.15 feet more or less, thence South 88°06.'58" West 132.13 feet more or less, to a 1/2 inch steel pin on said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road, " thence North. 00°25'30" West, 177.15 ,feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 00°25'30" West, 135.00 feet along said Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. be, and the same is rezoned from R-40 Residential to CC Community Business District, and Section 11-2-425, Official Zoning Maps is hereby amended to reflect the same. This rezoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for rezone. Section 2. The Applicant shall pave parking areas adjacent or near property, the design standards for off-street parking in 11-2 414 must be met, specifically including the fencing. Section 3. That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above conditions the property shall be subject to rezone back to R-40. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after it_s passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this day of , 1994. APPROVED: MAYOR -- GRANT P. KINGSFORD ATTEST: WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. -- CITY CLERK REZONE ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT Page 2 i~ ~ • • a STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN TAE CITY OF .MERIDIAN WHICH IS GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 6 AND 7 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE"; passed as Ordinance No. , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the day of , 1994, as the same appears in my office. DATED this day of STATE OF IDAHO,) • ss. County of Ada, ) 1994. City Clerk, City of Meridian Ada County, Idaho On this day of , 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS my official seal written. SEAL WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the day and year in this certificate first above Notary Public for Idaho Residing at Meridian, Idaho REZONE ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT Page 3 ~~ OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, Clty Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Flre Chiet W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAVNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-221 I GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor -APR 1 8 1994 SHARISTILES Planner~~6,,Z+yyo{{ning Administrator CITY ~! 1~+it~iU'I/,JOHNSON ~~~~Q~ ~J~ f~irman • Planning & Zoning 0 ~ APR 194 NAM?A & MERIDIRRAN TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVF~#~~~RIOJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, may we have your answer by: April 12 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/30/94 HEARING DATE: 4/19/94 REQUEST: Variance ReQuest BY: Mike and Cynthia Sciscoe LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: 2210 N Meridian Road, portion of Lots 3 ~ 4 of J.E. Pfost's Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER OEPARTVENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER -CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT , ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH • NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on-the variance request for Mike and Cynthia Sciscoe. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS RECE~~IE~BERTD CORRIE CITY OF MERIDIAN WALTW.MDRROW CENTRAL ~ •• DISTRICT ol'1"HEALTH I~ECEI`1~D . Retum to: DErARTMENT ^ BOIS@ REVIEW SHEET APR 1 8 1964 ^ Eagle CITY ~1=. ~'it~~,is~Fif~ ^ Garden City Rezone # ~, Meridian Conditional Use # ^ Kuna Preliminary/Final/Short Plat ^ ACZ . _(/~C,C Gv T .3 t ~ E orS"f`S Sy d1 S 10~ ^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal. ^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal ^ 4. We wilt require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment conceming individual sewge disposal, we will require more data conceming the depth of ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet ^ 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ^ CeMral sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water well • ^ Interim sewage ^ Central water ^ Individual sewage ^ Individual water n ^ 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of HeaRh • and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: • ^ Central sewage ^ Community sewage system^ Community water ^ Sewage dry lines ^ Central water ^ 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probelm. ^ 10. This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined 'rf other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any: ^ Food establishment ^ Swimming pools or spas ^ Child Care Center • ^ Beverage establishment ^ Grocery store 13: .i~'~L-"S / y ~~L-'- /lJyJr/ ~~ CrONN~-~7~ DATE: l d ~i/ ~~~--~/~-~ SL=7.J~~ ,~/-~~pos.4~ Reviewed by: `S~`S ~~ O2' ~l~.SEG/~EIL" ~~ CDHD 10-91 rcb / /r1~,4-/~R~L~' . 04-05-1994 01~24PM FROM CPML TO 887481332 P.01 4 1 • DORADO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY {2~8~ 344.6511 P.O. Box 26db Fax {208) 345-b321 ~ Boise, Idaho 83701 Aprijl. 5, 1984 ~~ Ms. !Shari Stiles City] of Meridian 33 E:. Idaho St. Meridian, ID $3642 Post-if' Fax Note 787.1 r~ ' ~[ p- To Fi Pho (~1+ona A~ ~- F2x # ~? ¢^~ Fex M Fax;. 887-4813 . RE: rezone Request Dear Shari, L~arrX D. Stevens sn[~ I, as individuals, are the currEnt owners of the x.55 acre piece of property located on the northeast corner of Nort~i Meridian Road ;and James Court, aka "Parcel DIY"« We receiztly purchased this land from the entity of Dorado Development Company,; of orhioh Mr. Stevens and I are sole owners. At one point in timei, Dorado Development Company owned the .42 acre{s with residence;, now owned by Mr. Michael Sc~.scoe, aka "Parcel II", the .55~ acres, now owned by use, and the b.45 acre parciel located t0 thse east of the BGiscoe's property, aka "Parcel I", ;which is still obvned by Dorado Development Company. It ins our i.ntention~to request from th® City of Meridian a rezone on tl°ie .55 acres from R-40 to CC, allowing us to construct an office building an the property. As such, we fornEally ask that this letter serv® as our official request to the City for this zoning changre . . 2 amp enclpsin~ a 1eg'a1 description of Parcel III, the .S5 acres in question, Please contact me ai~ your earliest convenience should you have any further gtiestiors. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely yours, R t A=i el1 Preside RRA/!nh SHARI.REZ Enc~.r~sure TOTAL P.01 04-05-1994 01~43PM FROM CPML • TO 887481332 P.01 !miuIri Amount : $ 45.00 a^ C$ 33 D II L E - A Order No.: ST-9203'7425 PW Policy No.: 0-9993-67306 Date of Policy: JUNE 2.5, 1993 at 4:53 p.m. • Amount~~oE Insurance: $• 10,000.00 1. Name of Insured: ROBERT R. ANGELL AND LARRY D. STEVENS 2. Theiestate or iaterest is the land described herein cad which is covered by this Policy is: PFiE SIMPLE 3. fiheiests,te or iaterest referred to herein is at the date of pol3,'cy vested ire: RaBERT R. ANGELL, a married znan, and LARRY D. STEVSNS, a married man ~ ' 4. Thellaad referred to is this Policy is situate ia:State of IDAHO, Comity of ADA: PARCEL III Ci'~N~IENCING at the section corner comomon to Sections 6 and 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 Bast, and Sections 1 and 12, TCwnShip 3'NOxth, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian thence North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 2141,22 feet to a:point on the section line and on the center line of 1U'orth Meridian Road, thence • North 89 degrees 34'30" East, 30.00 feet to a 1~2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of-Way of said North Meridian Road, thence North 8B degrees 43'49" East, 328.22 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence Nt~rth 83 degrees 49`27" East. 129,18 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin .with a plastic cap, thence North $$ degrees 48'37" Bast, 389.26 feet to a 1Jz inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence • South 31 degrees 03'37^ Bast, 414.88 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pir~ with a plastic cap, thence South $8 degrees 34'59" West, 1057.50 feet to a.1/2 inch Post-it°'Fax Nots 7B7i i - co. Rh Phone tl / ~~ Faz w. ,fit' t~'" -" ~ k'/ 3 Fax a 04-a5-1994 01~44PM FROM CPML 1~' °'.' ' , ua ~ ~^ _ M • J'J , :,. TO 887481332 P.02 • Sq~r.ya' '. I f TOTAL P.02 ~ va i. ~~ • • March 4, 1994 To Whom it May Coneez~n: We are in agreement with changing our rezone request from C-G tP c::-C . MYCh 1 and Cynthia Sciscoe PO1 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: April 5. 1994 APPLICANT: Dorado Development and AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 1 Mike and Cynthia Sciscoe REQUEST: Rezone Request A ENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: LETTER FROM MIKE AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE • March 29, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: It is agreeable with us to change our zoning request from a C-G to a C-N. ,, Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe • • DORADO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (208) 344-651 1 Fax (208 345-6321 April 5, 1994 Ms. Shari Stiles City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho St. Meridian, ID 83642 Fax: 887-4813 RE: Rezone Request Dear Sham., P.O. Box 2666 Boise, Idaho 83701 Larry D. Stevens and I, as individuals, are the current owners of the .55 acre piece of property located on the northeast corner of North Meridian Road and James Court, aka "Parcel III". We recently purchased this land from the entity of Dorado Development Company, of which Mr. Stevens and I are sole owners. At one point in time, Dorado Development Company owned the .42 acres with residence, now owned by Mr. Michael Sciscoe, aka "Parcel II", the .55 acres, now owned by us, and the 6.45 acre parcel located to the east of the Sciscoe's property, aka "Parcel I", which is still owned by Dorado Development Company. It is our intention to request from tho City of Meridian a rezone on the .55 acres from R-40 to CC, allowing us to construct an office building on the property. As such, we formally ask that this letter serve as our official request to the City for this zoning change. I am enclosing a legal description of Parcel III, the .55 acres in question. Please contact m:? at ycu.r. earliest convenience should yogi have any further questions. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely yours, R t An ell Preside RRA/mh SHARI.REZ Enclosure • CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E. IDAHO AVE. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 /~ (RE: NAME : /' ` ~'~~ f VARIANCE APPLICATION Meridian Zoning Ordinance) U `tir SC~SLtl ~ F~HONE (Owner or h lder of valid option) ADDRESS : Baia N. m~~/l~~Gt~t ~~G~ GENERAL LOCATION: Parf~n o~~s 3 f ~f o-~c7~ ~sf S ~6allUl~/o~, LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY : SPP (~- ~G/1 PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR VALID OPTION: A copy of your property deed or option agreement must be attached. PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION ~~Iv ~~~ esfed VICINITY SKETCH: A vicinity map at a scale approved by the City showing property lines, streets existing and proposed zoning and such other items as the City may require. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS: A list of all property owners and addresses within contiguoug to, directly across the street from, and within a 300' radius of the parcel(s). proposed for a Variance must be attached. (This information is available from the County Assessor) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE : U~) ~7 G/tCP f~ ~ IIl')i~ ~~Ji d~n~~ SIGNATURE: ~ ~~, CITY COUNCIL RECORDS Date Received City Council Hearing Date Received By EIT "A" A1TACiiID HERETO AKD BADE A PART HEREOF TifAT CERTAIN DEED OF TRUST DATED E~.I DECEI~iBER 7, 1993. PLEASE INITIAL -~- TION OF LOTS 3 AND 4 OF J.E. PFOST'S SUBDIVISIODN, COUNTY(NDAHOTDE C BED AS OF, A POR FILED IN BOOK 4 OF PLATS AT PAGE 147, RECORDS OF FOLLOWS: AT 7HE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTION WESD, $OtSE MERIIDIAN~RTH, RANGE COMMENCING 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANG H 00 DEGREE 25' 30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 2141.22 FEET TO A POINT ON 7HE SECTION THENCE NORT LINE AND ON THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH MERIDIAN, ROAD, MERIDIAN ROAD, RTH 89 DEGREES 34' 30" EASY A DISTANCE OF 30.0R0TH ET TO A 1 /2 INCH STEEL PIN WITH THENCE NO A PLASTIC CAP ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID N POINT OF BEGINNING, H 00 DEGREE 25' 30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 42.15~FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WHENCE SOUT WAY OF NORTH MERIDIAN ROAD, SAID POINT BEING THE REA 89 DEGREES 43' 16" EAST A DISTANCE OF 135.02 FEET TO A 1 /21NCH STEEL P!N WITH THENCE SOUTH TH 00 DEGREE 53' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 131.03 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH STEEL PIN WIT A PLASTIC CAP, THENCE SOU A PLASTIC CAP, UTH 89 DEGREES 28' 27" WEST A DISTANCE O AY OF NOR H MERIDIAN ROADEEL Pl THENCE SO WITF{ A PLASTIC CAP ON THE SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF W F OF SURVEYS AT PAGE 624, AS 133.00 RTH 00 DEGREE 25' 30" WEST A DISTANCE OF B305OK FEET (SHOWN ON RECORD OF THENCE NO SURVEY RECORDED UNDER INSTRUMENT NO.8426809 IN AID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF NORTH MERIDIAN ROAD TO THE REAL POINT OF FEE17 ALONG S BEGINNING. i BLUE HERON LANE __ __ _ ~ ~ ' 11p11MO/ i \~\ nOiNll/ InUMNIN IlRMIM11 I ~~ 1 \ I \. J.B. PFOST'S~•• '"'~"' nuwns .I .•~ rnlwn/n I \ . I ~ tnnlwm I ~ ~•. nulNw rnlwl/w i SIIBDIVISION \\~~ JhMtS CT. CPril/~It°~ `'~ ~°s x ~~ ~~, -. 3 ~rid9eNioOG~ I~~k Imw~w e~iX° y CPYO f09ed ) ~\ /`~ y~~ '~ q~ ~~~ ~I~/~ ~~ rnlllwr ~ Mir nrullln ' DRIB nrluwe . mwu/wl ~~ t m C < Z m mrs~» r ~ W nwlnw nwrlll Z Z •~ •\ I I `~' ~ ~ nww»/ ` ` r~SE . STR ff T nrul/N/ ~~.` nww/r ~ x ~ ~' , ~ ` • ~ ~ ~ F fAllNW ~~ '' ;L 'f Q 1-1 ~. - "~ ~ 1--1 i ~ ~ 1~~~.~~ ~ ~ r A A • • PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET Ted and Wanda Hepper 43 East Fairview Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 James Court Associates 760 W. Myrtle St. Boise, ID 83702 Bedelco, Inc. 5204 Sorrento Circle Boise, ID 83704 Bews & Smith 5204 Sorrento Circle Boise, ID 83704 Jack E. and Doris F. Barrett 2250 N. Meridian Road Meridian, ID 83642 James Banducci, Jr. 2116 N. Cole Road Boise, ID 83704 • . March 29, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: It is agreeable with us to change our zoning request from a C-G to a C-N. Micha 1/and Cynthia Sciscoe • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MARCH 1. 1994 APPLICANT: DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 10 MICHAEL AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE REQUEST: RE20NE REQEUST A EN Y COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY EINGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CITY POLICE DEPT: "REVIEWED" CITY FIRE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer CITY OF MERI RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer DIAN ROBERT D. CORRIE BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WALT W. MORROW JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. 33 EAST IDAHO WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief " " MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 Planner BZoning Administrator W.L. BILL GORDON, Police Chief ' JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. GROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887813 Chairman • Planning 8 Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. K[NGSFORD Mayor MEMORANDUM To: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor and City Council From: Wayne S. Forrey, Planning Director Date: January 6, 1994 RE: REZONE REQUEST OF MIKE AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE AND DORADO DEVELOPMENT FROM R-40 TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG) At the December 14, 1993 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, Commissioners expressed concern about additional CG zoning along North Meridian Road. The suggestion was made to explore a less intensive commercial neighborhood (CN) designation rather than CG zoning with the applicant. The Commissioners then tabled this rezone request to allow Mr. Sciscoe to meet with the City Staff and evaluate the merits of Commercial Neighborhood zoning at this location. During the past three weeks I have been meeting with Mr. and Mrs. Sciscoe to review the Commissioners request. Mr. Sciscoe has considered the merits of Commercial Neighborhood zoning and his family's business plans. Mr. Sciscoe agreed with the Commissioners that the CN designation will blend with the neighborhood better and still allow his business to be developed. Mr. and Mrs. Sciscoe are very sensitive to good development in this area. They are committed to being a ;good neighbor and likewise they want compatible development"~s~-~ to their property. They believe that CN zoning will provide adequate safeguards for quality development in their neighborhood. Based on my review of our Ordinance and meetings with the Sciscoe's, I believe that their businesses can be developed within the CN zone and benefit the neighborhood. I recommend that the CN be approved rather than the CG zone as requested in their initial combined Sciscoe/Dorado rezone application. Because the CN zone is less intensive of a land use, I don't believe that a new public hearing or an amended application is necessary to facilitate this change. • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS COUNCILMEN WAYNES.FORREY,AICP,CityClerk CITY OF MERIDIAN R A JANICE GASS, Treasurer ROBERTGI S ER BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G CROOKSTON Attorney JR 33 EAST IDAHO MAX YERRINGTON . , ., JOHN SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO $3642 ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman 2ontng & Planning BILL GORDON, Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 JIM JOHNSON GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 Centennial Coordinator GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor Memorandum To: Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council From: Wayne S. Forrey, AICP - Date: November 5 1993 Planning Director s Regarding :Request for Zane Change from R-40 to General Retail & Service Commercial (C-G) by Dorado Development plus Michael` and Cynthia Sciscoe. Zone change and land use request of C-G complies with the current and`proposed Comprehensive Plan. This site is within the Mixed Planned Usebevelopment Land Use designation as described in the proposed Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Comprehensive Plan indicates a need for-service commercial facilities in this area. All public services are available or within reasonable service.areas for extension. This request is for zone change only. This property is a small portion of a larger parcel that was recently annexed as R-40 to allow an apartment complex. As the site improvement plans are prepared and submitted,. City sta#~' will review and approve any site designs to achieve a high quality project as called for in the Comprehensive Plan and in neighborhood meetings. .. . OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY. AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS. Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY •,,.., ..~ ,~, ..~ .. ,....~ . A Good Place to Live .. -, COUNCILMEN CITY OF MERIDIAN' , ' / ,_., ~ RONALD R.TOLSM ROEIERT GIESLEA 33 EAST IDAHO ~..: . .. ,..... _ , , MAXYERRINGTON MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ROBERT D. CORRIE Phone (208) 888-4433 cnaim,an zoning 3 Plan JIM JOHNSON FAX (208) 887-4813 Centennial Coordinan GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your co ments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian •~ ~,,~,~; s may we have your answer by: 9 TRANSMITTAL DATE ~C`'~,~.f" ~~_ 144_:~ NEARING DATE: ~o~e~~er 9 lgg3 RE O U E S T : t~ ZO_~ P fiY`~ -•n ~ - 40 -}~ nn p.na ~ Cpw~..~ ` [i ~ ~ C p.! 4. G ~ ...~OQ LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Z2 J O ~ . 1~Par;(~i ,~ ~a( JIM JOHNSON P/Z WERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANi,P/Z MERIDIAN POSIT OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS} JIM SHEARER, P/7. ADA .COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH GRANT KINGSfORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO`.-(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BOB GIESLER, C/C U:S:-WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) MAX~YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDIN CITY FILES /~' ~~ . G INSPECTOR OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~7,~~; ~:;~~,~~ ~~~s. POLICE DEPARTMENT ,~(;,~,-~, -~ ~,~L.,~ ~ ~, ~,~~~,~,~ ,~, ,~~ CITY ATTORNEY 6ARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER ~i,c~iv; fu~~ /3~c s~~,~~ ~~ ,' L-L ti~t~ri y~ ~-, WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER }'vl~z -f- j~ L ~.. e L ~ ~=5"~~~ is t N P,,~ ~ 1 Si~~F, • ~PERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS __. _ _ _. Bob L. Haley Dot EXCEL -~ - -- - DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT k !!. Dan Mabe, Finance r£ Administration Z~ DIRECTORS ~~~-~~~ ~* Sheryl Belknap, Elementary Jim Carberry, Secondary Christine Donnell, Personnel Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET • MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 • PHONE(208)868-6701 /2 Q ~~ November 2, 1993 City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Dorado Development Co. Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Dorado Development Co. This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is beyond capacity. The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a need for additional school construction. We ask your support for a development fee statute on new home construction or a real estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we ask that additional residential development be denied. Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school as it may be necessary to bus students to available classrooms across the district. We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike paths and safe pedestrian access. Sincerely, ~a-~~-- an Mabe, Deputy Superintendent DM:gr h 1~ L1 ~. cn ~. G• t ~ ~ - 1 Y9 J' In C• r') P ~ r ru w s~u-. c. c~.mmu9 m^-. - V S J 1 Y'1 ID S _ •u P j c psi n Y cn c+a os ~i1 m to -) m + h a+ .. c, o e - - o .- cs ..i. ~• ~~: c o iF+ n m vs ,- iii ~] •~u ~ , `- ... N m •~ 1~~ u. ~T. n. ~ d " .-. G 7 O i O I>• t ~D m S h m m W 2 L~ m d N « . U ^. r Z 4. !l. 1 Q t..) V I W L J9 1~ W L N H W= N n Lv N [~~ L - 1 m m-0 m d n -O [' 1 1 1 1 w h .~ h cv m m o m a u9 d In o-0 ~. +• m ,v O 4 N ... h m O w In d S [~ d -r Y9 -0 In [~ d in N d Y9 o 1 '. '. J tT ~. S N ~ W h L m Y9 rT 11.1 O [~ O J-0 d -0 In d A In 1r1 Y7 •,O m N d Y~ In ~ 6 I I W I.~ x at M ]•! x x :.! x x x x r: at x n ae I C O •~ v- 0 •~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ O O O i G ~ +' ~ A Y5 .r IA IA ~ Y] i) to (Y N u'1 Yh9 0 0 0 0 0 -n O .~. ^~=^~ G m 0 4 Vf Y9 ~• ~• i LA ~ 11.1 w = d ~. ~ m -r ~ 11'f ems. G W ~ ^. ~ 1 « O: 1 m Q m~-0 m m m b tT m 0• m^ S m n O` P ~ ' V N [n u• m h O ~. S o. h 119 ~. O N ~. -. m W ~-0 m O G [~ P m T m N-0 N d P G ... ~. i « P ' . ^ .[) m ^ O h O• m P m n! -0 YVi IdI O` O O~C tT ~ ~ I I « I `~-s -r>)re xxx>we x)~ xx I xx I >Kx l H - •~ .~ O O .~ ~~• O O O •~ ;J O O O V s ~ O tL N N N N N N Ya N N N N N N N N CDL~3.xx`utx1tY'R>~Ytxxxx I sex M 2 ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ 0 0 O O u 0 0 •? O ~ Y n 0 0 0 0 0 •~ O O O O O O O O O I t io ~ I I I ~ m a Indmrnlndmh ` ero ! o•momo ts- F m o o• m m P o m o Ira : m I n m F « i ~ i v ~-0 h va ta• m :~ a w m--0 a In w a is ~' ~ « f ~ ~ 1 1.¢i [+1 •- NoY9 cu-nF-nmN« n-o ~-o j [n c,m;~cr -0 o[e•ocoo-oc-n nr-o Yu « I ' ~ i n)~ I.r3NGmmn1- -•-n u9c vh« nm0.O u) J .o m m -o m m m n- d ~.n m ta• 0 L ¢ I ~ z ¢ .a w ~ -• m m ug m :J N r+ Y9 to ~ a - I I d a m tr h o• m O• m e w N d m • I m m z .,. r.F •- o c ~ m .r m tr ua r o. m m cno N mmh - •~ ammw-cn- Ina1a d 1~ r . . I t c~ ra x y.e =-< :... sx > < Ire :.e a.e x : x x ~ w T .- Ir, m m Ln .x] -o -r t>- c - ca- w m cxi- t> ra S In 8 13a ~- tL ['~ Y7 « G d m M ~ N [~ N 17 O O W . . . . . . . N Y = 41 P ~ m -L ~ '~ IT U 4• In m O- ~ O ! ••-• ,c w co m ta• n in < _., ... u9 ru -ter 0 0o I 1 1 1 1 Q p I V t/~i m h O r~ N . -u n• Y9 r v1 -0 -- -0 ~ ..• ~n ~ r r d ~ ~i n ~:'n Sri [~ .r .r u m o A ~C 6 V r .n 1 ... I ,T I I 1 1 ..-. Y) a In .-, 1 1 i i) L ..o .T } ~ cu .T ~•+n, .o cnn t). ^a .r I.i o - -o o o cv w to ` s ~ -r ,n - r- -• r v In G 4 i 4- ~] 1 ... .,-. tV .~ ti N Iv _. ~. ~t 0 2 u P m n -) cn ~ ~lI w Y. n n mm ui - 119 r a t- ~ d ~ u) v) c- -: .n iu r a u 1 u. ,1' T s u a . .ii s a ~v i:- n Ln n a~ ~ ? ~- - W 2 m °n - ~~i m ir, w .J .iL r J _ W J A'. ' J ti . ._, o et ._ - n a W 7 y !') 1 •S Z r 1 W ~f. J ry lu I.r '• - J T J_ t p~ ti Vl •~ a o m N ~ In rD ti r ( Y9 •? -0 ~. ~ N N I m P C YF'1 Al1 f Ifl Y9 n b m n tY m tT In [>1 t U') J I O -0 b n [mn tY lt] •P If1 2 ]It x x O v 0 ~ W o m m c~i oc ¢` ~ m S O O .x~ Oa ¢ G O O O a `Y m In ~ I N I o. N m-~es~ d i h m m i 'aaln o a a ~. m ~ °n ca Iie as x i I--• RA P 1!1 Q W [n u9 N .J.. LuY- .~ 4 ~ w i ~.. . Y 1 IH [,- ea• W m In .W. 1 N 1 i v ~ i ' en Ii9 •a u9 i • ~ Y7 M i d !1 . . .i c~« I _~ I O I u. , I In ta- u. -. m 1:) I ..~1. 1 N U) {A Q N 1 ~ .L U'? I ] m I .:Z . ... I •S U I '-- 11'f C .a I t7 1 t)- 1 I w ~~ ~ iu i U) ~. .~ ,1 U « 1 m _ - i J tT ^ n m 1 O -+ ^ 1 :f. .-. 1 1 1.1 ~ 1 1 r r- 1 1 .J ; i~l ~ i ? 1 G 1 - , Q iJ tJ I ~. .„ ... 1 I m I In 1 .~ I Ln I m I -a i m 1 I f I I I 1 I i I _ -0 Y9 .••, I In ' i ~ V~1 I Y O 6 I m r.. I ~ O O m r x O O I um9 .moo I .om.. u ~ ~ ~T 0 ;~ m In I -0 I m d I 1 i as I ± I -19 Ai i P a o- I °I,) I ~ -0 I m •A O • 1i 1 d i vs +. s ? O 1.- 'm 0 O i ¢ IF I d IA I P P I o- -0 I ..7 11 ~., ¢ N ~ n m tt: G 0 [V r r O N O ,] Y) a umd M h O• [[L1 i n I I J I I r- ~ o 1 I I 1 I i i I x' O p ~ a m u Ifa m M -0 m m ()[ 0 Y9 1 0 [~! Y] ci) t^) ~t v ~~ rIc .°. w .~ cmn •~--. d N [~ h • t .N... .~ t1') vu- -.m In scum o ~ ') 1s•• - m : n. -. >a .o z a v ii 4 N m [~ ,t i (..l O ! W 1' tr 1•~ ~~ u +. . r) d •.: CT CJ a [•. .~ Y9 S C.l w s w m .r r-- 'ia u-...r `~.. c o• '~ ,°,~ r ~ li) tIJ I!Y U W ~~ Iy Z' m F- 119 I m m m .m•. m a W [~f m ~ 1 .- m D 1 1 n~f • ~ os d N R1~) '" « , ~) .s 2 49 t.i LL t7 N to e'a <n o 1 1 a- m •_ ~ m e W ~ m J ~. W I .t O x x x O O O [L O O O C ~ O O O O -i) m ~. m m tF.f N In th>f O w '~ m .O-. I O ^J Ita i 0 1 N t -0i -0 nFi o a m .N-r U NI 4i ~ in I %r. 1 1 T 1, M Il) c- .*~ u9 ._• u .u ..n fD M 11 N ^ W I W J .J _) W :z ~,= J ~~) .J ~ ~ T 4 W i). w :~ N LL) i' 1 W ! m [.. Y. O t 1) o I 1 m fJ Y Q.! 7 a N d ~ tT ~ 1 Y_i nI N W I M x >w ~ x Y7 If v v; ~ .l' d O a o ~ -0 h ti N_ N Al m a m N Lt! n O N « N 119 .> .gyp d In o 4:= uo°-m In [~ J .J O- ~.. n .~. IZ In h T x x C >~ .a -a=e aR ,re L 7 O m I~ ~ O ~ O s cn 1 ~ m I d i m I [~ N Y m I eta .O d I -~ : 1 I I ~. = - I I Y9 f ' I I t - a i «in •~om i • ~ -0 1 O• [~ t~ N 1 In F I m x x as T. •O Z In N ? G IJ ~ m •J) 1 .f W -J a ~ 1 [a d ' 1 m t.1 1 1~ m m 1 t_ 1 1 ' c ~ I e ~ m 1 L'1 ~= n) paj « F Q U M 1 F o ~ ii ,>_ n ,r ta- L- .~ m 1 1 e~ 1 Ii H ,' =~i ~ m n u u~i ~J ~L N it i Q [_ P m u it :c u •~ o i %n •-a T -` •1 al ~ y ii 1 ~) to L~ a• ~ U _ I T :_ 1J (Y 11 . ~ .r w '- S ,.' ~ i 1'1 u, )il ,u:- • 3-!r:•rs~ asp) •t: 3srr. 3r~i•t~r^ ria~etrr_ii»s~ ~-+t.)r rrss~r°#i»st Ye.~Y^3ai=-r i;3-ri:a mr:~»t:fy.. f~-+r+ the 3-3rAar^in~. C~.ni-3~Sa a»r3 3 tii•~r_ir;~~reri tlsra "s3r^~»rif~tl~rr••" ::,it+.rdt:iL-+n s))>~r~ i»-ri~~ttz E~»rj ix+i`.3-) f~3t Lt»cot»fL->rta. big wit3-) it Ls»3Ls.~ it w~,~ ~~.:~,-+3 uti=3;y Y)~c~~~t~y+y,. ~i»i=~wc is 2,v,m»~t :Aere» seti.•ir_i~»r_s> ~.-+f' i•3)ra ~.~-,mr»er>r ad3.r »,~r)-rosaries»ti d3 ti3 3L-,)+-~a»r..~ aS yr_t:.~ u-~rc3 ,c+r••~•s'e>•• i-o 3~:i•re th~q^b ~-+~-r`t L-,ut Ls»3r=~, ~~~+~`-,3L+t~3y »e:rr_s:s~•.s_~ar_y, tf• YL-,u w~~»3s:3 as»er)r3 yi,LtY^ r_`r~rr^~:pr,nc3L:»=^~ $t+ r~F~ri t4~ta ?~Lls)NS't )ym>rr3 r~r^hdi•3Y 4~c+~~r-~~ca~~e at. t•,tk~ rii rj nz-~tt-r •i:3~~~{. a i, wa:3 ,i; 3t~d •t:f~~i•!: it was ria se,3 3,'+v,~ri ~+» G-f~ ~_s.pr±ci s i c,.,3 3 y_ Mci~L-,e 3i:. tirt~r•,) ~: r-.~v~+» ~~~+~+3 _y, •bt~ ~'•-14t. 3' ~u~'~,r,~~ wrrr' 3 3 •f i »t:i ~.:.tr-i: •tt.»)rarr~~w. Asa d y._,u f i nr_•f r:~»_,~ Ci t~ ~.~rrii »ar>c~ ~-+n i 't? Z F sc,s wr=y ,,i sstsre 3 }~ 3 i ~rr~ t~~ •~rer i t L~t~f~~r^:ehd>'xi. ~~F:1~t :k ~:7 ~i :1 SYS ~L'•lY"~. ES»i`.• i•t1 Lf :31 't~d'~• y+'i:~t) d35i7 F'fay, U':S A t`r.'+vy ~f ~,i+LSY' '~{. Gl} Y3S))Y°»'E: S~`%~~.. T~ a "+'~ wi 3 3 _t l)!~i:: t°»vL)r^L'~ t~d'E: 't 3')C`>'~• WOY7~ t: i~a" a+»_Y uh:,ra~_ »)i au»t~er^3i:•d»ria» ~~., i,~~33. m~'~_yiiez t~»_PwtiY', fiir3h•G '3~fs<~».k_a s~7~s,c3•) Yi,r S.aLtir tr^en7~»r~i,~sy n•_..ixi::rr-,c~ i» 'this. n~dttra>•. ~ ~~~s~~y 3+ r'L,n7 : i~f ~ t=•3-s Cain 3 ~iC 1 •ac: t'+~C+ 3;tr:rs 3/Y't'+~,LY'{~Y ii''~acme Rer.~uest sirtittb•d 34,.:;veA~l~er', 9} 199 3",-,: S~3r^, i.d,~y»e F~-,rr'ey,t 3-f;a. fi3->nr^i fit. i 3 e:sf i~fr~svsi~er~ +~+f t3~7er ~+,c,ar>3 s ~le~ar^ Si res a»t3 A3~3 r G',nas 3.1~> ,-~r'ir~i»EU31Y' ^_~ubs,sii-teri a rises,:.»t= r'r=yLSe~.,ta»~ c,LSr }ZY',-,}.,eY't_y ire C:-f., to e»ai-,3t~ t;ur' rt-n7i3y ^tr. rLin ~- i~t•~s»e• ~+Li:3i»ea'4. Lout= t:t~ wi-sat wr• fatr3ieve tr, it+e mi~sLi»rier•~i-a»ci»tg_, r~»ct~u»ttsrr;r3i it 3'r2+~ t~e» Y7et=e'~'~C3>•}~ tt, s»t=et wi ~:h 3+9~ri ti i ar> 3~3 t~»»i »a a»ti 2~•~»i »s} Rer>t3 ~+Lti bn7i t. ttr i :~ d et t car t L-; 1«-+u. 3'3-rs ft~31~-+wi»~•~ c>ut3 i»ir~ t•is+.~ ar~r>>er>se»t reF~r3-7er~ L~twt~» s»y~r~3 i~'s i~fr. 3-t•,rreyr 3Ns. ~ti3r~az ~~rrti P4 r'. 3't-•+s» i~St+»trr_+3t S~ttt+r»r>y fL-,r ~t ±r'kiti,.~ .fi1YVL_ 2 r_,tJ 4!r•:°3 ~ ,_~» 3+'3N Y'f:37 •~t,~ 1 :':~9=r•i 3'i~e suz~ i» rraaw`•,»:_, ~=rr•• »~nt dr_•ai ri »~ tc; ri iv i~r~ t ix• ~r'o~~rr-t•~ i» c7LSe~.tiL-+» i»tr, t~wL-, :,e.~•n~r•F.~taa 3r~t=s. ~i9 ~rt~a3,'>st-:d i» ti-sr f•rtct~ •_+. .n»r:3 3^ i»r:i ir••,o~, a•~~ :^aust_+s,si •l: te~~ri LAY !ir^. ~'>'+_+r3<.t t•,» Are ate, fr+3 d ~-+w:.. s .!'fit: ct:~Li~Y ,af~ tl~,m 3 ~yr,ut t~f t 3-ses w3~t-+3 a }~rt;~ert y i» glte5t i t-+»i i rrr 3 ur3ir,sy t9s~ nxi :mt i »s~ 3•sL-;ASC•e ,.*.1»rj I ~-~vrY-,s a. »ess~r art t~e+>~ f•<~ v+t~u 2+i n~~iitt! i f i »~5-,,-+-sus i ~3 r4 tr~+ a>•r_•et ~-,r,::+~.,C.2acrj rctros7s77rr'ri ai ~+..>; I rti »_~:~ rjat~ tea 3 at-3t af' f,:;,ot~ns3ta :ieff: Ei•re~i d~at+3e ai~t>sr rr=rct+r7>w t-+•F •i:i~i~• ~i~~e 3~. siividi»r3• ur~~~.rr'tw :i»•tn t~w,_+ 3c,t~ ca33,-> waLS3ri »rak~ t 3~~ 4,s>set 3 3 r=r e~-+nrr>7isrc i t+3 3 ~-+•t ~.,» urye~L~»L~nsin~i3 re_=s»»ar~t_ ;dtm !sr3iewe ti-sat it: i~ ~L-+s3ii•~3ss •t 3-s at Fi Ias3< t->f u»sit?rr~ta»iji» r~~ t: t, e:.s ~~>: •i• 3 y s~ L-+r,, t tie pr,-+x-,e>'t }~ i =. 3 ~~ i c•3 L, ut < i . e. t 3.7e r:.r ~~r~ •! ~i afs. Laf• prr~r,ert~ •f~,ar• ~rt~~-,,a,-:eci ~:r>s»a7~er••3= i a.~ u~c,~> srsay 3~t+vrr 1_nLS±+rst; at-;nse ma•sLS»i~rr'Rt~~s»rja»r~. S713=L~t ti-SEa ~L,}'r•NCt E!::ta~~t7rir~ ~c±»a»~ L~f• •t~isin •r,LSr'r't-+LS»tfi»L~ y',rt~L,tar^tita=:, 3-rn•~7 ~-e» n~i~-•~tattasri ••a» f- 3yr> t^ ,:~L ts., a»r:3 it i s•>t~ i »~~ a~ =,tsi~sssa ti? ec3 t,-, Ls :^_*.. ~3 rad^^+e g,ee ~:;fyi!'aat S-i ar,s3 £}.~ F~ti:ar_3.7taci. rrr'c:,s)7 3-:,i's3.t+:it .f='„ _Frti1L1 sM:a33 r:t-,i,icf:r •~;->t~ ar_:t~.tial ~3i:~e t-,f tize aY'QF+ ;~~~ bra t~i=•,re3 ~,~,r'r3 :Pr,;,r c~,sss~sty-ci aI Ls•~r_> i •~, L-,n3tf ~iL~r :~r 2 ~iSr . +'~.:, s,-:,, ;z:i>~:•a~:s~ r,:::,y s-~ ~~:¢ysc~ r',-+t-,Q"t _r: t~,~ t 37e~ i s57s7s~,~i a•t a »,-,r•t h i =s ~• ti.sr r,2r-:± '' :~ ;tt~r•:~t?c-' ; :': •-~~ r r>~ i :- t:~ 3 _•:~, b~* s r,s_ t.st .i 3 :i : Fr:•,~? ~~~ a . ..... , i:i is""}C. fs. ~~•. ~,• ~•~•••,~:3 txy'±; _}: .~t'; ~t'7F 1~7 f?St:~1 R•~; £` °~t->L1 t~3•r Y's re~i~,.se_:c••:- i »~, ~i?:!,r~•r• C--^d ,ar >_-Lt a~v7i»~t v,+hi c?~e•;Jer traL-,r 3t^~ L-;ut • • :~di:? ~:+~3:it=ti;s? •~?-s~• f,~33L~stii»~ s'~r.•~i~t~^~al s of at }Slr-rr~e> t~+s~ ~s,-+ar^ri., s:,+L~ts3r3 f: r.~;k.+3r +_s~ t;;., ~,sAttr.,>r ~+t~ i:~i53e tL, t3se>vrt3L'~' tt7e ~,y`t+}-+s!~r't_sf . *;?r t'~e Lf~:3k?:= F1 =: t:?i5~'3i i»t'r_3 :s.» r>ur' L-+r`x~a»a3 rs•-,~,:,»e• ss.s~,sYSatta3 dY)Lt r~ ::L'~ CY_+»7 L",Y`AS t+~+ t}f Es 1_'~P?5Y^tE!:~ L'~~ t}y £. ~.]'{: ~/ ~t't: t,Y`»+E: ~/ S a. t;', Y^£'~Sil»L"D j; ;~{ra SM)"S L',I 1P' s?Y'L1 }:}EY^~~W' r"~'j Y`2~t3'7 £>Y^ {-.~t)Y7 ~'~G. ~Y_> f7r~iY1??~ Y'•~~t~ LSta>'~{: L~Cf £>'MSL{C~>7cQ t71~ t~£> L'~r^t'3] »p•i»f_La w)7] l=~S cii=ral3L-~s.•-~: Y't~~id>,»ti,c~3 u*_~fa rtif ~-G pr'L~}:.sar'ty. T!-7i~r~ 7~t~:;te~s~e:.>»fi: ~i~ n>asie it°7 t!» F R• ~' h~a*_+ r,~t~ser r_c,»5°u~.eti +..s4+z ~-:,.sQ ti, i:l~Yt=, statuA~ L-,f' tf'sr• SarL,r+rar'tY' t~L', t3-sse im»s~rlaats~ »L~r•t3->~ ~.,r'i»r~ C_G aY7Cj c+ct+_s~,it°,:3 cam rs=•~.itisRr7tia3 ~,L,{;}7r ~~> a I si.? uY~tir~r_-:.t r:, r7ci t•`Y i ~: ~~r,~,tytsy,;:~•' t 5~ i:+t~ rs>i=~»t I _y r-+LSr^c:~,t+^,ec3. '3")7~ s-act_+ to»ri F"i»di»s~a tvricL ref'er` tc+ i`•3-;r: },r'L~s-~s'Y`t~ }~ :~>, •~ ls,~:+ »t+rt Sz i» ~>rrt->r i a . rr. "ass »~ 3r> f t•3 A3 .7 ~~~ r^e__•]rj S?7')Ce" L',Y7 ~., .d 3~t?> ct ~L-_ a'i»r~ 2; S~Lai» 7':=i »t3j~• f~;s»i.l_,~ rr_•-•aas3e~»tial" L}» }'?n;]~£> ?~ i~r-fit. ~S'7 r.'; r7~i Lays»•~ t tYE" 2h Y'G•' fM] 3 .; ] Y)f.+ tL1 ?qVA] tCS~ Ll L1 r• :rC+»] ~ ri":>~s.st--~r# i:L> {":-,+~Js i{' ~`•-•G at,»a»~ ia, i'f•sr.~ cL-+»t•er» with i.37 ~.. 3 f ~bh :i a j «, •::t i 3 3 ~a ~~rt:•L~.? L+>n~,r sri~°•y wta p3 r.=e+~r rc_r..reiveu s~+rif.tr:•» tfi~r-unre»tr.:;tiL~» L~f #l7i3 t~+rr_3i»a»t:~,, a»+~ 3 +.55.?-_:t s:7 +~E_^»•t:}~ r^•sc~ut 4t f}Y`Ci »Cj 7'c1 t3">£>Y' ris.~.h •~: :~ t„ r'e_~+i de L1Y'7 .43'7'4° aY•L'~r'Sfc'7`i•y LSY?+.] ~ ?s•.:Zi£? L1 S- ']X371t~J ~iY'L'ijSt?Y••i-y ~~. +inr_t 8~'•' t+i= t3~Q ~,r•L-+~.,r_>r•ty fr^a»t !->~+a, :t+s-±e» rQwni r.3r»t a a3 a »,3 lsr:,s asxss:~.ra3i»r~ 7»atur~ Ie»r~s.;rt&}.~i»~ i» ~xi~,tt~-»r_•~ a I r' a ri s3 ~. < sk,•~ r' eq u=a •~t t, r=.i rY r~ r. 3 3 +_+v-+ed •t,-, ~. 3 ec3 Y£.° ~»ti ]Sri ~,r•ilYt +.,s~+:+r7 >,r3-rai: e->,•i_,ts {~+i$h aY7 3.3r _~~tt~Ar.•ky rast3•s>°r 't1'S8r7 ,_~sn-~tr'L~~~ i:.l7r•~ {,ee+vi:.i fu3 fr^a»•t:~+s~r.•.> ti 3 r^r~~;ti3y~ satt~»rii r7Q ir7 t~rtis:_>r• fiL-~ s-~LSi-• ir-7 F5 _ ~~ 3~.ir>,=3sr.:a}~i»g _.,fA~t+ac3c. T}-re~ }~L~r'ti+~» a•f' t)•7e 3~.t w~> r,3.~» ts_7 r3r_~•,~r3L~>:, r,~sss»errial3y >=ti,»tai»~; nsai»3y }•~arici»i~ aY7d cir'ivewa_yf AI 3L:,tn~ent. 4,'-~~ t,+ttits3r3 t,t=> •w~r~. vai 2 3 i »s•~ tL-, a»x;ure ~s»Y u~~s~rAr3i »~ ,c,i= t`sQ ~;.r-•a•N•So.2 a+a_3tasrr.~>rrt. »~rt~=r~, t,• a- ~'::,r• a~s+ •ktrr fer7ri r>~ t:L-.»t,er'rr.~, ~,rL~ts~+3-r~: u}a i» •thr> Far.:t ~~7~rj f':i »r4i »~_3, f;ynci»s~ }?I ans aI r~asiy s>xi Est i» LL-~rritir..r :•s b5si 3 ti.i »z, F~3t:;r7« ftw t}73a =.,mouth z-nd t~~act t,L~u»c•3ar'i ew a¢ L, 1.1 r' tSr't, v_7f; r+'{'. :tr. i~S:` HSY1,S~f:~ ~i:i 3'S ca }']~Y '~Ll Li?•7•£:>L: 't f>=>»t^3»~ i?Y7 t: hr »L~r•t!-7 a»ci wc•at. -r ? ~Y7 ~C yi:?LS c, t.}ci ] Y7 i',:, Y' , yC,.SY' f«t7 Y,~•]~L'+>Y'I?I'~i],_,Y7 L'?7 L',,.yr' L7r•L',~L?y&3 ?}, .i '/~ ~ /C =.• c:,, i7+•s is t L~+ •t~ h P_ m~; »}~ s'i;s 3 ~-; ysa N+t! 3'7 to v L° Q>i s~i:: r :i 8 Y7>; Esf3 fY i t• h t ~ i N, r`[_?•:~i:+ Y7E> r6::*t~+.5 G~-:• ~~ < Yof.:' rit i~:5 .i {~ B~, ~,r"l'?C .S 4"1 't E> t9 Y7Y .tli.',~:•~. 7 ~.?; F nSei_'1»°_4 t;.l f >>:x.;.a,:~at~ ins C1-7~! to »,:v3 . ~.a:..er~- ,,f= •}: - .~ ~ S~:i _• rr_>x.~urr~i:, "~`~ ar73r y;au. CiS~oE P,e a~~Q r~ ~~~r~zT ~ ~~,~ T v~~c N ,~o.o D A T ~,~FS~-,vT ~~ ;; ~ ~./ L AQG--E _._ C _ ~. ~ ,-~Ec _ , '~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ f A 7Z0 ~ `/-~/ .,, r y o ;; . C'~0,2AGE /~7-(~ . ~'~_ L/ ~. ~'~ lbNCs2e'~ ~~- ~i[A~ Gl-o SGA3 '') i3vs,v~S. ~, ~- r 3 ~ ~ 6 iPES/dE1~CL° / 3G.oG ,`~~.,~ '~ v ~~ ~ RG ~ ~ Q,p ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ C° ~~ 5~ '~ 1 ~- ,- ~ . \. [ ~ i ~, Y~ % ' ~ / ~/, ~ ~oSC 'i' ~ ~\ 7 /C!/CIZG~Zr6~.vS l3u$~..5 C~av~L X35,- / ~ /~ ~3 30 SS.pC c/~trL K _ _---- ~_~ i L ASr /h~.vT __.____ GJ-rT/~ w,o ~~ ,L,'oUS~S'`o~ .G'oos,-IO~J ~- ~Y iB-3 ~~~ r P~o~v yY ? ~ ~ ~ Shoe /~`6 ~ ~I .`~ z ~ ~ o ~ ~ lo-~o ~ ~~-o 131-b oo ~ 0 ~~ ------- S ` S, ~0-6 ~. ~ [aI l'v22~tu/n~ n ~'_~~ l'oTTAGc ,•~ GvAQfi~fovSt wcw ___ ~ f',Po~°os~1) C -iSl GA a AGE Q ~Pe-.eso~•~~~. ~S 0 q ~~ ~s ~~~ t ~JA.QK/~JG S ioE w,a~,~ ~6, /~JE.e rq s,p,v ~ 0,01 ,~ ,~,~-A . 3~ F'~E~/vP,ey jj cE~ ~ -f ~;°/drvGJ .~.._- F awerzPe~e, " ~ ~ ~ 30• • Thomas DEVELOPMENT CO. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION March 7, 1994 Ms. Shari L. Stiles Meridian Planning Director 33 E. Idaho Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Ms. Stiles: Thomas C. Mannschreck President 111 Auto Drive, Suite 105 Boise, Idaho 83709 FAX (2 8j 375-8985 Thank you for meeting with me on Friday, March 4 to discuss the re-zone application pending on properties located on the east side of Meridian Road north of James Court. We support Mr. Sciscoe's application to re-zone his property to CC and our property to LO. Mr. Sciscoe has agreed to fence, at his expense, the easterly and southerly property lines of his property. We would like to work together with Mr. Sciscoe to make sure the fence is compatible with other development we will be doing to the east. The Meridian City Zoning & Development ordinance suggests a 35 ft. wide landscape vista on the Meridian Road frontage. We intend to build an attractively landscaped structure. However, until we have finalized our site plan, we are reluctant to agree to a landscape strip that is 35 ft. wide. We would rather work that out with you when we submit our building permit application. If you rave ura~, further questions r please let me know. TCM/cc cc: Robert R. Angell Larry D. Stevens m.=ias.n. F E D -- i T-$ 4 T H U 1 0 3 6 ITC SOUTH P 0 1 • • FAX 7RAN3M17`I`A!. Tb: WAYNE ~RREY a~ - ~ ~ " ~1 ~{ S!X PAGES Dear Wayne; Is there anyone besides yourself that it would be benefitiai for us to send the io0ovvlhp ~r b in order fbr us to get this problem worked oul? The paper sent for us do approve or dis8~pprove seems pretty messed-up to us. We hadn't realized ~ w+ould be the final Facts and Findings. What will happen i<w~e disapproved ft isn't at an what we had in mind for our property and we're finding some problems with iCs oontsnts. Ptease inform. We know you are busy and vue're sorry to have to bother you with this master, but it rosily is a~ectinp our whole situation in a negafn-e way. We'll be in Nebraska until February 21st and in Boise on sho 24th or so. Our phone is 402-573-81372 and vwe can be reached by FAX aY _ Thanks for your adviw. Sincerely, m ~ c ~~,~. MiChaei and Cynthia Sciscoe ~ }.~ r ' ~~d ~ ~ ~~ ~ s t~ ~Ye ~ ~~ ~~t5~a~ ~~ l~ ~ ~_ .~ ~. ~_ 8533 FEE - 1 7'- 9 4 T H U 1 0 0 3? ITC SOUTH P 0 2 • • February 15,1994 7o Whom h May Concern: We have apprecia#ed the efforts put forth bo work out our Zoning Request which vMe flied in October, 1993. Regarding the mast recent f=findings of Fact and Conclusions sent to us for approval, we have many canoems. Ws are new th these proceedings, and perhaps this is typical of Zoning Reques6s, but vVe find ourseMes very confused regarding several issues and seek clarification on how our request has Mean handled. May we outline out ooncems: A) Before ever considering purchasing the property in question, we had tyro MAiN prerequisites: one, that we would be able to live in the house, and two, that we be able tri have our Retail i3ovkatore on the property. As our initial request states, w9 are a family run business. A secondary desire was >q be allowed bo have a smat'l weocfshop on the property, also, if possibie. B) Our first concern appeared tin be no probiern with this properly, since the house th the immediate north was already zoned Commercial C3ener-i, and there vnere (and still are) people residing in the house on the property. to order eo determine whether our second prerequisite would be a problem. ws spoke with Mr. Wayne Forrey (current City Planner). At that meeting, Mr. Forrey felt very positiNS about a C-G zoning change due to the i~ that the property tics the north (which is a twa~story house) was already zoned C-G and that k would fit in very w~eU with the Meridian City Comprehensive Plan. He mentioned how beneficial k would be eo do so, explained the Zoning Request procedures and gave us the applications. ~ The flr~ P b Z Meeting held on Novernbex 9th was at very positive one. The only complaint spoken was that of Doris Barrett, who owns (and currently lives on) the ptapaty directly to the north. She fe8 a fence ought tie bs required between her and tour property. This rsaues# was ruled out by Mrs. Barnett then sat down and said nothing further. The Board did r-ot mention any further problems wkh the request and it was suooested that it be approved for Facts and Findings, vuhiah it #hen was. Nothing else was brought fia out attention at that meeting as lasing a problem. We subsequendy purchased the property and cbsed in December. We found to renter for the duratioh of the Zoning Requetd procedures since ws are unable as yet to move tfiere wills our business. ~ Within the blicrw'ing month, vMe heard from Mr.Forray that the City Attorney, Mr. Kiricston, was apparer>tly having a problem of some sort regarding the zoning request We were bold that since Meridian Road appeared to be a main entryway into the city, that Mr. Kirkston was aoncemed about the wide ganernil.usage permitted by a Commercial Genera! zoning and was feeling the City needed tta have some proiaeotion from unsightly businesses being put therein tho future aRer we sold the property sane years later. Mr. Forrey d'~scussed the inning option of Neighborhood~ommercial (C-N) with us. We referred ~ the Zoning and Development Ordinance (1983) for Meridian and believed the C-N Zoning to be suitable for our purposes and had rw probtem with our request being changed bo that, which we communicated ~ Mr. Forney. F E B- i 7- 9 4 T H U 1 0 8 ITC SOUTH P 0 3 • • This was conveyed to the 13aard and the decision was to be made at the next P ~ Z Meeting. E) We were informed that oonsideradon for our request was postponed unfit January 1 ith. At that mee~ng, RRr. Torrey presented our new requea~ and sinrae a C-N deslgnatlott requires that the property owner worts dlredly with a City Planning and Zoning official to approve ths proposed business, he asked that wra be shirt ttt work with himself due to his knowledge of our proposal. He already knew that it would f'rt into the plan for the area, nct being unsightly in appea-ance, etc. We arenY exactly sure what the decision regarding this request fumed out to be at this meeting. We know Mr. Forney had received somq sort of okay to deal directly with Mr. KirksEon on some of ths details. Mc K'irkston THEN stated that he had a problem with the property being zoned Commercial at all, since the law states that one cannot reside on on a oommerciatiy zoned property. iiow this can be, we don't understand! We know ib- a fact that ths Barrette have recently purchased the property directly nod doer tQ the north, and vae krwnnr for a fact they are residing on it and chat it is zoned C-f3. We didnt know if et waauld be appropriate for us iQ bring this up with the i;toard at the meeting, so vve did not ~ We subsequently spoke with Mr, Forney to inquire what decision had been made regarding ths C•N Zoning, t-le informed us that there didn't appear th be a big problem, but that we'd need bo work out something in writing and it wouid need to be s!gn~ed upon befin-eerr Mr. Kirkstor'r and ourselves. 9eing unfamifiarr with what was poin jl on anyway, wee agreed do have Mt: iCirkston work out ths "agreemerrC' since he vuould need do approve it in ths end. We also believed that it was dearly sated in our Zoning Request exactly what we were desiring. Since he had read that', vue teR okay about this. Gj We had been planning a family trip to Nebraska for months prior to these probierrrs and had to leave the Area, so Mr. t=array sent the proporal that Mr. KirtcsEon had written up tb our Nebraska location. This turns out th be ths Findings of Fact and Conclusions that we are herein speaking of. The descriptions in this paper ar+e se much itt opposition t+p what wee iftitiafly requested in ths first place, and ws are very confused as ba hotiv all of these changes came to be. We fee! we've been misinformed {possibly just due io our ignorance of ths olf+ciai sounding isurguage used at the meetings) about what had ha4ver! p1aGe prior 1yo this. We fee! we have been lei out of this dec~ion altogether. is this typical of these procedures? K appears by this paper, that Mr. NGriaton has made certain deductions that we had no idea were even problems or considerations. We respect Mr. Kirkston's position as City Attorney, we just wonder where ti-ese issues came from, because they were never verbalized at either of the public meetings. k starter at the end of the report, that if we do nct agree with ths Endings that iR is recommended that our Appi'~at!on be deniedl By the way, the Findings of Fact even have property spoken of for rezone request that are net even included in the original request How could we even consider approving a disapproving rezoning property that has no rezone requesfedZ We are hereby requesting permission to sit down with Mr. Forney and Mr. iGrksbon to discuss the zoning request that wee initially flied so that vve can cieady understand the issues brought up in the Findings and Fact sirMe we wmre net made aware of them otherwae. We betievod ths thin was to be the case already. We had no idea this was F E B- 1 ~i'- 9 4 T H U 1 0 C~ ITC SOUTH . P 0 4 to be written up as our last option or we would never have agreed to it being written without us. K necessary, we can type up a detail~l list of the areas in question on the t=lndings and Fact that are confusing us. There are also a coup>a of areas of inconsistency. Otherwise, we will be back in tavvrt on the 24th of February, and can meet with you after that date. We do have one further request Since we were under the impression (as a result of our talks with Mr. Forray and how the meetings were sounding tv us), that things were going okay with our mnina request, we had planned bo more onto the property by March 1st. Our renters will be moving and we have made arrangements tD reiocat+s our home and our bookstore. Realizing that we cannot as yet open our Retail BaOksbore on the property until, and ff, the zoning is worked out, is there any possibility of our at least opera0ng the Mai! Order end of our book business from the existing garage on the property'i' A small portion of the book business is mail order and this wary, We wouldn't have th glue up ALL of our income from the bookstore by closing down completely u this can be approved by March 1st Please inform whether This is a possibility or not so that we can deride upon cwr living situation. Sincerely, 1~ --C.~-~-~ Michael and n#tiia ScisGDe F E B- i T -'9 4 T H U 1 0 39 I T G SOUTH . P i05 • THE FOLLOWING OUTLINES THE PROBLEMS FOUND WITHIN TiiE FACTS AND FINDINGS iN 4UESTi4N A. We initially requested GG zoning because the properly directly north of this one i8 already weed C-G. The owner directly south is also requesting C-G and has business plans far that property wisp. Wa have absolutely no immediate plans t0 tzell our property, but had assumed that we would be selling down the road at some time. We felt assured about our zoning request since the house ~ the north is already coned CA and the City Planner, when asked, belt pcsitive about the idea and encouraged us. When the time comes for us bo relgGate, we believed the new buyer would most iikety NOT be interested in living on the property since it would be "sandwiched" between loco commercial properties and probably would have business plans for the house ado. This gave us confidence in proceeding bo purchase the property, as wa have done in the meantime. With the proposal b keep the house part pf thsa property as resrdeMia~i {Page 6, 41f8), wears now unsure as to hcmr much troubie we will have in seNirrg tf+e property when h becomes necessary. Folks as aurseires, seeking a tamily run business setup tilts wa believed this to be, are few and far between, 8. Can you please give us reference f+or the law staling that one cannot reside an Cammeroiai property (Pape 8, #~? ff such- is factual, what will be done about the residents m the nortl~? k would appear that the law is being brdcen here. Page 7, Ill9c is in error in that the Gd3 zoned property directly r>artfr has been feR out of the neighborhood description. C, C-G zoning far all, as irrrEiiaNy requested, would also require the Isast amount of setback space. Betrtg our property already has such a email area fa our business, the ether proposed zonings besides C-G (Page 8, ~ would require so much additionai set back, that ik would leave very little, if any, space fbr our purposes at afl. Our understanding is that the house and the leftover space (for the business) would bs made into two separate lot's each with dfi~rent zonings. We already ham lfmitdd space do build on-the separate Iota as required ay saparab zonir-gs would dp~ away with our business space altogether due th the eudra set backs, not allowing us b fsa able b have any business there. Q, if the law does, in fact, allow people to reside on Commeroiai property (as is Currerltty occurring throughout Meridian, eNen with recently pun:hased propertles such as the Barred}, and if the only other concern is that Meridian Road not have business' iocatod tf+ereon that vNOeafd not be appropriate for a city enttywrty, oan"t rho rul® on Pape 5, ~ be lnCorporated? R states that the City has authority io piece conditions on a rezone. Can't the Board simply require that ail ov+mmrs of GG property to question be required io have business' pn°rapproved, or be r+squired to have zoning changed ~ a lesser Cammerofal zoning at the time of any resale? Since the Board has expressed acceptance of both Sdscoe's rand Dorados proposed usage of the property in question, this would sure seem tD aimplifjr things for aN parties irtivalved in the request The f+ollawing liaT;s discropanci~ found in the Facts and Findings that we'd tike th bring to your attention 4. Page 2, #'s 2 and 3 mention 7.21 acres and Page ~', #t8 mention the proposal to zone 7.21 acres located behind the properties in question, as L-O. That property is not included in this request Please see property description In our anginal zoning request 2. Rage 7, #8 sirovas a recommended C-C zoning for our business and Page a #10 shawx a C-N recommendation Tar the same. 3, Fyaga 2, #2 sthtes 'that Thera is a single family residence fin the north... " The property th the immediate north lei zoned C-C3 and has a couple living on the property. FEB- 1 T-'94 THU 1 0 40 I TAG SDUTH P 0~6 .v Pagel 7, f18c slap neglects to mention this fact K again states''single family residentiaC'. This fact seems to be onredooked altogether. Being that it appears #~ us to be a xety imcortant detail oonoeminp our whole toning request, we wanted th make ears the City Attorney and the Board were avrare of this tact. 4. Page 4, #10 and Page a, fl90 Speak of fencing problems. Much attention appears to be gNen ~D this issue. At the very first P & Z meeting held on November 9th. Mrs. Barrett (the neighbor directly to the north) wets th. onTy person with ob~eotions to our toning request. She stated tyro things at that meeting. One, that she had received no vMOrd of our intentions. As your retards indicata (Page 5, #1 }, notRce was sent expltiining our intentions. Wa tnuidrt"t understand how she would have been notified of the melting she was in attendance at ~fisnrvi~se, artywayr. ;wo, that she frail we ought to be rsquirod to put fencing up between our property and hers since we rnrere puttlng a business up. This'issue appeared ~o have already been dealt wrth at that meeting. k was stated by the Boatel tl~at since she already resided on ComrnerCial property, this r~squast could oat bo oonsldered, since there ww~e no regulations requiring fencireq be put up between 1w~o Commercial propedies and that it might be different ff het property had been Residential. Sho then sat dawn and vNe have nod been infarmsd of any furttt~ communkafio~ between her and the Board. We had not mentioned it< but we had plans for fencing anyway, whether i# was regained or not. We must adroit here, however, that we are quite baffled as to why this fencing issue has been g'nren so much emphasis here since it appeared to be dealt with at the first meeting. We would greatly appreciate your assistance in helping to aolv~e r problems regarding these Facts and Findings. Thank you. /~ fct-~ISC~e/ Cynthia ~isto MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: FEBRUARY 8, 1994 APPLICANT: DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 1 MIKE SCISCOE REQUEST: REOUEST FOR REZONE - TABLED AT JANUARY 11, 1994 MEETING AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA STREET NAME COMMITTE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: • c~nc JAMES E. BRUCE, President GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary November 3, 1993 TO: Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe Dorado Development Co Inc 1711 N 30th Boise ID 83703 FROM: Larry Sale, Supervisor Development Services SUBJECT: MERIDIAN REZONE - MERIDIAN N/O JAMES R40 to CG Your application for the above referenced project was approved by the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District on November 3, 1993. The attached staff report lists the conditions of approval and street improvements which are required. If you have any questions, cc: Development Services Chron Meridian City Hall please feel free to call me at 345-7680. ~; ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 c~rc JAMES E. BRUCE, President GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary TO: ACHD Commission INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE MERRZMER/DSTECH 11-3-93 DATE: October 28, 1993 FROM: Development Services SUBJECT: Meridian Rezone Meridian n/o James R40 to CG (Applicant - Dorado Development Co., Inc./Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe, 1711 N. 30th St., Boise, ID 83703) (Representative - Michael Sciscoe, same address) FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe are requesting a rezone from R-40 to CG for 1.0 acre of property located at the northeast corner of Meridian. Road and James Court. The requested zoning desig- nation of CG (General Commercial) will allow construction of an office building on the site. This site is a part of a larger area that was annexed into the City of Meridian this year with a zoning of R40 to allow devel- opment of a multi-family residential housing project. The District placed a requirement for a traffic study (not submit- ted yet) on the plat approval for Bridgewood Park and may be requiring that James Court be upgraded to a public collector street. 2. reridian Road currently has b0-feet of right-of-way and is fully improved with a 41-foot street section. The street was reconstructed in 1992 and no pavement cuts will be allowed without Commission approval. The 2000 Urban Functional Street Classification Map designates Meridian as a minor arterial roadway. The District requires a minimum of 90-feet of right-of-way on arterials in an urban impact area, width sufficient for 5 traffic lanes, 5-foot sidewalks, and bicycle pathways. The ultimate. right-of-way will be acquired when a specific development plan is submitted. 3. James Court is a private street on an easement that is im- proved with a curb along the south side and 20-feet of pav- ing. The approach at Meridian Road. is 24-feet wide and is too ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 ~~eridian Rezone Meridian n/o James R~to CG ^~ctober 28 , 19~ Page 2 narrow to handle the potential traffic from a proposed 80-unit stibdivisiori (Bridgewood Park) at the east end. of the street along with the existing apartment complex (50 living units access James Court), and also whatever may be built on subject property (assuming .it takes access to this street). 4. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridi- an Planning & Zoning Commission on November 9, 1993. If the rezone is approved and. development proceeds, the District will provide the following recommendations to Meridian Planning & Zoning as conditions for approval. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.: 1. Submit a Traffic Impact Study to the District. Coordinate with Traffic Services Department prior to beginning the study. Additional requirements may be imposed pending the findings of the study and any design engineering work accom- plished prior to the District's review and approval of the study is entirely at the risk of the applicant.. 2. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridi- an abutting parcel (15 additional feet). The owner will. be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this. benefit zone. 3. Utility street cuts in the. new pavement on Meridian Road will not be allowed unless approved by the District. Commission. .. 4. Access to Meridian Road and ,James Court will be restricted. Coordinate with District staff prior to submitting a specific development plan. 5. Replace unused curb cuts on Meridian Road with standard curb, gutter and sidewalk. 6. Provide a minimum cf 40-feet of right-of-way and a 41-foot street section on James Court from Meridian Road to the east- ern boundary of subject parcel. Reconstruct the existing roadway section to District standards. The existing curb and 4-foot sidewalk may be .retained. STANDARD REQUIREMEN'T`S 7. Street :and drainage ~,,*nprovements required in the public right- of-way shall. be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies.. ~•Ieridian Rezone Mer~ar. T1~:J James R~Q to CC~ Cctobnr 28, 1993 ?aae 3. red.icated stroets ~~nd drainage systems shall be designed. and constructed in conformance with District standards and T~oli- ~.i.es . 9. Snecifi.cations, land. surveys, reports, p.la~ts, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACHD shall. be .:~ealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with ?daho Code., erection 54-1215. .;.0. Provide •~ritten approval from the appropriate irriga- tion/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. il. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drain- age appurtenances, etc.} outside of the proposed street im- I,~rovements. Authorization. for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. ~_2. COIltinue existing irrig~~.tion and drainage sj,~stems across par- cel. 13. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District. for review and appropriate action. 14. Submit site drainage plans and calculations :for review and appropriate action by ACHL. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the. requirements of the City of Meridian and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of-way or in a drainage easement set aside speeif- ically for that use. `"here shall be no trees, fences, bushes, shads, or other •~aluable amenities placed in said easoment. 1.5. Provide design data for proposed. access to public sr.reets for review and appropriate action by ACHD. 16. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. 17. Install a stop sign on :very unsignalized approacYz of a project street to an .intersection involving a collector or arterial as the crass-street. The stop sign shall be in- stalled when the project street is first accessible to the. motoring public.. 18. Aright-of-way permit must be obtained. from ACHD for all street and utility construction within the public right.-of- rlericiian Rezon~ Meridian n/o James R• to CG October 28, 19_. t~aye ~~ way. Contact Construction Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file number? :for details. 19. Ty request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirn- ment or policy outlined herein shall. be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within. l5 calendar days of the original Commissian action. `1'he request shall include a statement e:~glaining why such a requirement would x_esult in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments,. please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING: DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: T,a:r. r~,~ Sale ~IOV 0 31993 CENTRAL ~ _ ~ •• DISTRICT - ~HEALTH ~,~.~ ~:~._ . _~~.~.~ Retum to: DEPARTMENT ~. ,, ~ ~ ~ -` ~' • _ •, . ,:; ^ Boise f~EVIEW SHEET .~ : .. ... ^ Eagle ^ Garden City Rezone # f~~0 ~~ ~= - (~ Kunridian Conditional Use # ^^ ACZ Preliminary/Final/Sho7irt~P/lat ~U,~'rr~H.~ (~ ,//G ~' ~~/`1 L~7~' % C= U /~rr'.(~.o ~i_:~ ~ Yi/T~ i.A ~C iJ C:7 ~ ^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal. ^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil condftions on this proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewge disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be bcated above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet ~- 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: '`~]- Central sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water well ^ Interim sewage ®. Central water ^ Individual sewage ^ Individual water ^ 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ^ Central sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water ^ Sewage dry lines ^ Central water ^ 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probelm. ^ 10. This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined If other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any: ^ Food establishment ^ Swimming pools or spas ^ Beverage establishment ^ Grocery store ^ 13. ^ Child Care Center DATE: ~ ~ %/~ Reviewed by: ~ i~~,~ CDHD 10-91 rcb OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY. AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS. Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, FireChiel BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208)888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor MAX YERRINGT01 ~~~~~~~® ChairmanZonn g 6 P er JIM JOHNSON ~ 1 o c T ~~s3 Centennial Cop,dlnat PATSY FEDRIZZI NAMPq & MERfDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your co ments and ~ recommendations will be considered by the Meridian ~ -~ ~~,,,~~ s may we have your an^wer by: ~~~ ~lF+~;-. _ _ ~ U ~ ~ TRANSMITTAL DATE: (~-{~be,~- ~s Jgg~ NEtaRING DATE: ~yef,.t~,~r 9 Igg3 REGIUEST : ~1c Zpr~ -1-Y` ~' LIO ~ ~ Cpn..~p~ 1 I n. CC G~ BY : ~br(~ LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR +~e rah es~' C'~,pa-,.:, I.~ JIM JOHNSON P/I MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/I GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONAID TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C BOB GIESLER, C/C MAX"YERRINGION, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER s_e~ C'...1 rr1 i ae~ a~~~` C In-l~;g Sc,~,,..~oe PROJECT : 2? 1 ~ Yl~ • ~l°.r`~C~i a.~ ~d o r~ nrler c~ ~ `a ~l MERIDTAN SCHOOL DTSTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS} ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DI5IRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT ccTTIFRS IRRIGP.TION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO".-(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) U.S WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: _ Nampa & Meridian Irri>ation District has no comment on the rezone for ora o evelopment Co. Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe at 22]0 North Meridian Road. ~~ ~~ Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • ~~ " • -• - A Good Place to Live _ ,~ . COUNCRMEN CITY OF MERIDIAN ~~ - ' - " ~ ~ RROBERTG ESLEf • gin, Tr-. .-, s-~ ~~- - ~.-4. n r~ j ~ 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 28 October 1993 Bob Angell Dorado Development Co., Inc. P. O. Box 2666 Boise, ID 83701 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nampo 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 RE: Land Use Change Application for Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe Dear Mr. Angell: Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above- referenced development. You are also being sent a complete packet of information concerning Land Use Change, urban irrigation, and exclusion. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call on Donna Moore at the District's office or John Anderson, the District's Water Superintendent at the District's shop. Sincerely, DAREN R. COON, SECRETARY/TREASURER NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT DRC/dnm cc: File Water Superintendent Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe City of Meridian ~0?°~ ,~ ~_- -_ APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 ~ • BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AD ZONING COMMISSION DORADO DEVELOPMENT & MICHAEL AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE REZONE APPLICATION 2210 N. MERIDIAN ROAD MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled matter having come on for public hearing March 9, 1993, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., the Petitioners, Michael Sciscoe and Bob Angel, for Dorado Development, appearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian having duly considered the evidence and the matter, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That a notice of a public hearing on the Rezone Application was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for November 9, 1993, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the November 9, 1993, hearing; that the matter was again considered at the December 14, 1993, and January 11, 1994, meeting, that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to the newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That this property is located within the City of Meridian FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 1 • • and is owned by the Applicant, Dorado Development Company, and which property is described in the application which description is incorporated herein; that the property is presently zoned R-40 Residential but is now vacant land; the area in which Applicants' property is located has a house located thereon and the remainder of the property is vacant land; that there is an apartment complex to the south; there is a residential subdivision to the east across Meridian Road; that there is a single family residence to the north; that there is substantial commercial development farther to the south; that it was stated in the public hearing that the property being purchased by the Sciscoe's is .41 of an acre and the remaining property to be used by Dorado Development is 7.21 acres. 3. As stated above, the property is presently zoned R-40, Residential; the Applicants have requested that the property zoned General Retail and Service Commercial (C-G) and the Sciscoe's propose to use the home as a home, operate a book store on the property, operate a small custom cabinetry and furniture business at the far end of the bookstore, and Dorado Development proposes to use the remainder of the property for a single level office building which would provide tenancy for professional uses such as doctors, dentist, attorneys, real estate and/or insurance agencies but the C-G zoning is requested. 4. That the C-G District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 11 follows: ~C-G1 General Retail and Service Commercial: The purpose of the (C-G) District is to provide for commercial uses which are customarily operated entirely or almost entirely within a FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIOPdS OF LATrJ Page 2 • • building; to provide for a review of the impact of proposed commercial uses which are auto and service oriented and are located in close proximity to major highway or arterial streets; to fulfill the need of travel-related services as well as retail sales for the transient and permanent motoring public. All such districts shall be connected to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian, and shall not constitute strip commercial development and encourage clustering of commercial development. 5. That the property is contained in a Mixed /Planned Use Development area as shown on the Generalized Land Use Map of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 6. That the r~roperty has frontage on Meridian Road; that Meridian Road is designated as an Entryway in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan; that the Entryway Corridors Goal Statement includes the following statement: "4.4U Encourage 35-foot landscaped setbacks for new development on entrance corridors. The City shall require, as a condition of development approval, landscaping along all entrance corridors. ." 7. That sewer and water is available to the property. 8. That comments were submitted by the City Engineer and are incorporated herein as are the comments of the Meridian Fire Department, the Central District Health Department, Meridian School District, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, and Meridian Planning Director. Those comments are incorporated herein as if set forth in herein. 9. That Planning Director submitted two comment sheets, one date November 5, 1993 and one dated January 6, 1994; that in the November comments he stated the zone change to C-G complied with the Comprehensive Plan, that the Comprehensive Plan indicates a FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 3 • • need for service commercial in this area, and that as site development plans are prepared and submitted, the City staff will review any site designs to achieve a high quality project as called for`the Comprehensive Plan; that in his January comments he stated that he had met with the Sciscoe, at the request of the Planning and Zoning Commission to discuss the C-G zoning, and it was agreed by the Sciscoe's that a C-N zone would allow them to do what they desired but would blend in better with what was already adjacent to the land; that similar discussions were not held with Dorado Development. 10. That the abutting neighbor to the north, Doris Baret, indicating that she was not sure what type of business was proposed on the property and that she desired that a fence be constructed between~he property and this development. 11. That the property was recently annexed and zoned; that the requested zone was R-40. 12. T\hat the Limited Office District allows for professional offices; that Limited Office District, is set forth in 11-2-408 B 7. as follows: LL-O) Limited Office District: The purpose of the (L-O) District is to permit the establishment of groupings of professional, research, executive, administrative, accounting, clerical, stenographic, public service and similar uses. Research uses shall not involve heavy testing operations of any kind or product manufacturing of such a nature to create noise, vibration or emissions of a nature offensive to the overall purpose of this district. The L-O District is designed to act as a buffer between other more intense non- residential uses and high density residential uses, and is thus a transitional use. Connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer System of the City of Meridian is a requirement in this district. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 4 • 13. That the allowed uses in the C-G and L-O Districts are listed in 11-2-409, and such are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 14. That proper notice has been given as required by law and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission have been followed. COivTC3,US I SUNS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicants' property. 2. That the City has the authority to take judicial notice of its own ordinances, other governmental statues and ordinances, testimony that has been previously presented, and of actual conditions existing within the City and state. 3. That the City of Meridian has authority to place conditions upon granting a zoning amendment. 4. That the City has judged this Application for a zoning amendment upon the basis of guidelines contained in Section 11-2- 416 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and upon the basis of the Local Planning Act of 1975, Title 67 Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, and the record submitted to it and the things of which it can take judicial notice. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 5 • 5. That the uses allowed in the C-G district are substantially more intensive than those allowed in the L-O district; that the Meridian zoning Ordinance allows only the listed allowed uses to be conducted in that zone. 6. That since there are various proposed uses on the land requested to be rezoned, including residential, retail, cabinetry, and offices, which are not allowed uses in all zones. i.e., residential uses are not allowed in the General Retail and Service Commercial district, it makes logical sense to zone for each proposed use rather than establish one zone that allows many intensive land uses, which may not be able to be controlled by the City; the concern of the City is that there is potential problem in zoning the property General Retail and Service Commercial and allow the proposed uses under that zone, but then have those uses change or fail and be replaced by more intensive uses allowed under that C--G zoning. 7. That it is concluded that measures need to be taken to allow the proposed uses, but limit the possibility of more intensive uses later. 8. That it is therefore concluded that the property should be rezoned to allow the uses set forth in the representations of the Applicants, but to deny the request to zone the entire parcel of property as General Retail and Service Commercial; that it is concluded that the .41 of an acres property to be used as a home and book store and cabinetry business should be divided and the parcel to~used as a residence zoned R-8, Residential, with the lot FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS CF LAW Page 6 • • meeting the lot requirements of that zone; that the remaining portion of the .41 of an acre to be used by the Sciscoe's as a book store and cabinetry business should be zoned C-C, Community Business District; that the 7.21 acres to be used for professional offices shall be zoned L-O, Limited Office. 9. That 11-2-416 (K) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian sets forth standards under which the City shall review applications for zoning amendments; that upon a review of those requirements and a review of the facts presented and conditions of the area, the Planning and Zoning Commission specifically concludes as follows: (a) The new zoning would be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and no Comprehensive Plan amendment is required; that the house has been on the property for a substantial length of time and can be allowed to continue even though the remainder of t:.~ property is zoned to commercial and limited office uses. (b) The area included in the application is not intended to be rezoned in the future, but is included in the Comprehensive Plan as a mixed and planned use area. (c) The area around the proposed zoning amendment is developed in a single family residential, multi-family residential, vacant land fashion, and substantial commercial Farther to the south and the new zoning would not be contrary to the existing uses. The land is shown in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a Mixed/Planned Use Development area. (d) There has been a change in the area which may dictate that the land should be rezoned, that change being its designation in the Comprehensive Plan. (e) No specific information was submitted by the Applicant regarding design, construction, operation, and overall plan for the land; that such information will have to be submitted and development controlled under a FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 7 . , • • design review process. (f) The proposed use should not be hazardous or disturbing to the existing or future uses of the neighborhood, if the conditions set forth herein are complied with. (g) The property will be able to be adequately served with public facilities, and connection to municipal sewer and water is required. (h) The proposed uses would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and servir_es and would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. (i) The proposed uses should not involve any detrimental activity to any person's property or the general welfare. (j) Development may cause an increase in vehicular traffic and this problem would have to be addressed in the design of the area. (k) That this rezone will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any natural or scenic feature of major impori:ance. (1) The proposed zoning amendment should be in the best interest of City of Meridian and the area if conditions were placed on the land and the applicant. 10. That if the property to be zoned C-N is adjacent to the property owned by Doris Baret and there will be paved parking adjacent or near her property, the design standards for off-street parking in 11-2 414 must be met, specifically including the fencing; that such design standards shall have to be met where ever the parking is located; if the Baret property will be adjacent to the home of the Sciscoe's fencing will be up to the parties involved. 11. That the Applicants, as a condition of the rezone, shall be required to meet the requirements of the 35 foot landscaped set FINDINGS OF FACT & COivCLUSIONS C3F' LAW Page 8 • • back along Meridian Roaa. 12. That the Applicants must meet all of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and all of the requirements of the Ada County Highway District. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS GF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS a~~rv~~s The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby ~e~tse~ these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER VOTED COMMISSIONER ROTJNTREE VOTED COMMISSIONER SHEARER VOTED COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI VOTED CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DECISION FND RECOI~II~IENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that the rezone Application be approved as modified above. It is further recommended that if the Applicants do not agree with these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law teat the Application be denied. MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: FINDINGS OF FACT & CGNCLUSIGPJS Gr LAW Page 9 ..~r'r."'* ~ • • Planning & Zoning January il, 1994 Page 2 Johnson: Moved and seconded to approve the minutes with the corrections so stated, all in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #1: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR REZONE REQUEST BY DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND MIKE SCISCOE: TABLED AT DECEMBER 14, 1993 MEETING: Johnson: Any discussion regarding the Findings of Fact as prepared by our City Attorney. Rountree: Since the meeting between the developer and Wayne it appears that they have agreed to the suggestion that we made to' down scale zoning. I think that would require a change in the Findings of Fact and I put that forth for consideration. I believe we will have to change the Findings of Fact because it speaks of Commercial General. Crookston: That is correct, the concern that I have is having the rezone either totally as CG or totally as CN and still have a residence in there. Under our Ordinances that is not allowed. Something either needs to be done either the applicant needs to request that the residence be zoned some type of residence, residential. The R-40 doesn't align with the density of the single family dwelling. That just needs to be worked how that is going to be done. The other concern about even if we could zone the whole thing as CG or CN is that in the event that it is zoned that way then the applicant occupies the .house for a period of time and then says well I'm going to move my business, then you still have the property zoned as CG or CN and than a totally more intensive use goes in that we wouldn't have any input into. I think that is a concern. Johnson: What is your suggestion on how we work that out? Crookston: I think that needs to be addressed with the applicant, and see whether or not, from his testimony he said he was going live in the house. So, we need to sit down with the applicant and see what a proper residential district to rezone the property to would be. Rountree: Did you discuss that with him Wayne? Forrey: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, we are aware of this dilemma. Mr. and Mrs. Sciscoe are here, and one of the things I think we can do in the Ordinance is look at a Conditional Use Permit for maybe a portion of the use of that property within thee • • Planning & Zoning January 11, 1994 Page 3 Commercial Neighborhood zone. It might be one way to alleviate that and put some time constraints. So if the property changes hands we are not locked into a higher intensity use occupying that home again. And the Sciscoe's have agreed to look at a Conditional Use Permit type of arrangement. Johnson: What is your thinking on that Tim? Hepper: Yes Crookston: You are saying Conditional Use for the house Forrey: For the home Crookston: For the home .and with a CN designation for the entire parcel? Forrey: Correct, including the Dorado portion as well not just the Sciscoe but the Dorado property. Crookston: I think we need to have an amendment to the application. Or at least an indication that they are applying for that or amending their application to that effect. Forrey: Mr. Chairman, would a development agreement be appropriate? Johnson: That would work. Forrey: Ok, something of that nature. Rountree: Would it require another hearing? Crookston: No. Johnson: Thanks Wayne. Rountree: Would that be stipulated in Findings of Facts or table it until we get the amendment? Hepper: I think we need to know if the owners are willing to do that. Crookston: They need to sign something to indicate that is what they want to do. If I receive that I can proceed with the Findings. So we can have them next meeting. Johnson: Okay, well then let's get together and do that. Anything else on that item? :~~ . • • Planning & Zoning January 11, 1994 Page 4 Shearer: We need a motion to table those Findings. Johnson: We need a motion to table it because its on the agenda. Shearer: Can Wayne prepare findings without a motion? Johnson: Well, he already has that motion to prepare Findings of Fact at the last meeting. Shearer: Are you sure? It seems like we sent that back to review. Johnson: No, that is why its on there for Findings of Fact. Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I move we table this item until the next regularly scheduled meeting. Hepper: Second Johnson: Moved and seconded to table-this until the next regular meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #2: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR KING STREET STATION SUBDIVISION BY D.J. INVESTMENTS AND BRIGGS ENGINEERING: Johnson: Is there discussion concerning these Findings of Facts? Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I have a~question, the Findings state that these units need to have 2 car garages per unit, if the developer decides to go that way it appears that it may be a major re-draw or re-design of that and I'm wondering if we need to see that or find out if it is feasible for him to do that,. if it is what kind of, how its going to effect the overall project. Johnson: At present the Ordinance requires, as I understand it, the 2 car garage because these are plotted as single family dwelling units, are they not? So they require a variance for that Ordinance. Hepper: I'm just wondering what that requirement Johnson: And you want to know whether or not that is feasible. Hepper: I'm wondering if the developer, if that is something he can work with or if he is going to have to re-design this whole project and maybe we need to start over on this thing if he is going td have to re-design the whole thing or should we just go • gum Amount: $ 45.00 S C H E D II L E- A • Order No.: ST-92037425 PW Policy No.: 0-9993-67306 Date of Policy: JUNE 25, 1993 at 4:53 p.m. Amount of Insurance: $ 10,000.00 1. Name of Insured: 2 3 4 ROBERT R. ANGELL AND LARRY D. STEVENS The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this Policy is: FEE SIMPLE The estate or interest referred to herein is at the date of policy vested in: ROBERT R. ANGELL, a married man, and LARRY D. STEVENS, a married man The land referred to in this Policy is situate in State of IDAHO, County of ADA: PARCEL III COMMENCING at the section corner common to Sections 6 and 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, and Sections 1 and 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian thence North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 2141.22 feet to a point on the section line and on the center line of North Meridian Road, thence North 89 degrees 34'30" East, 30.00 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of-Way of said North Meridian Road, thence North 88 degrees 43'49" East, 328.22 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 83 degrees 49'27" East, 129.18 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence North 88 degrees 48'37" East, 389.26 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 31 degrees 03'37" East, 414.88 feet to a 1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence South 88 degrees 34'59" West, 1057.50 feet to a 1/2 inch -1- Owner's Schedule A .ti:~8 ~y~~.y.u.... _ S9$.yo' ivy i. ~~ ~, • • MERIDIAN! CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1993 PAGE 7 Corrie: I would like it stated that the miniwuw square footage should be 1350 sq.ft. Crookston: They have the option to go~under the Ordinance that allows a mix. Corrie: Thank you. Discussion on square footages - see tape. Giesler: In the Ordinance, I would like those wanufactured homes to go under design review before they are approved. The Motion was wade by Yerrington and seconded by Tolswa to apps^ove the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law with stipulations to include 1350 squal^e foot home winiwuw, two caT^ gai^age and design review. Kingsford: I'll appoint two Council wewbers to be on the design review board, Bob Giesler and Bob Corrie. Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Giesler - Yea; Corrie - Yea; Tolswa - Yea; Motion Carried: All Yea: The Motion was wade by Cot^rie and seconded by Tolswa to have the attorney prepare an Ordinance annexing and zoning Conifer Subdivision. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #~: FINDINGS DF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST BY HIMERICH AND DORADO DEVELOF-MENT: The Motion was wade by Corrie and seconded by Yerrington to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as prepared. Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Vea; Giesler - Yea; Cot^rie - Yea; Tolswa - Yea; Motion Carried: All Yea: .~,~ • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1993 RAGE 8 The Motion was made by Yet^rington and seconded by Tolsma to have the attorney prepare an O1^dinance annexing and zoning Himerich and Dorado Development. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #3: ORDINANCE #601: VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR MICHELS AND MICHELS: Kingsfor^d: AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF DORIS SUBDIVISION, OF RECORD IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, SPECIFICALLY THE EASEMENTS LOCATED BETWEEN LOT 1 AND BLOCK 2 DORIS SUBDIVISION, LOT 1 AND 3 BLOCK 2, DORIS SUBDIVISION, AND LOT 2 AND 3 BLOCK 2 DORIS SUBDIVISION, MERIDIAN, IDAHO, ACCORDING~TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, IN BOOK 16 OF PLATS AT PAGE 1080, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone present who wishes Ordinance #601 read in it's entir^ety? No response. The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Yerrington that the r^ules and provisions of 50-902 and all rules and provisions requiring that Ordinance be read on three different days be dispensed with and that Ordinance #601 be passed and approved. Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Giesler - Yea; Corr^ie - Yea; Tolsma - Yea; Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #5: WATER AND SEWER DELINQUENCIES: Kingsford: This is to inform you in wr^iting, if you choose to, you have the right to a pre-determination hearing at 7:30 P. M., 06!01/93 befor^e the Mayor and City Council, to appear^ in person to be .,judged on the facts and defend the claim made by the City that your^ water^, sewer^, tr^ash bill is delinquent. You may retain Counsel. This service will be discontinued on June 16, 1993 unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone from the public that would like to contest their water, sewer, trash delinquency? No response. The Motion was made by Tolsma appr^ove of the turn off list. and seconded by Yerrington to Motion Carried: All Yea: s • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 1B, 1993 PAGE 13 Kingsford: The front half of it is. Arnold: Well it's been there quite a while hasn't it? Kingsford: It's only been there four or five year^s. Thank you we appreciate your concerns. Anyone else to testify? No t~esponse. I will close the public hearing. Counselor, is that differ^ent testimony than appeared at Planning and Zoning? Crookston: I think the conflict between the two ordinances, it was adds^essed in the Findings but there was no solution given at the Planning and Zoning level. That needs to be remedied. I would have to review the Findings again to see if they are basically the same. - The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Corrie to have the attorney review and amend the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #5: PUBLIC HEARING: ANNEXATIDN AND ZONING REQUEST BY HIMERICH AND DORADO DEVELOPMENT: Kingsford: At this time I will open the Public Hearing. Is there an owner or representative present to testify? Jeff Huber, 5209 tin-at-dible) Way, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Huber: I am here tonight representing Dorado Development. We have requested annexation and a rezone for approximately 7.6 acres on N. Meridian Road. As per your Planning Departments z^equest we have included the house parcel where Mrs. Himerich lives in our request now. Our rezone request is for R-40 with a ^estrictive covenant for 25 units per acre. We found that R-15 was not quite dense enough for us to build a project like this and provide the amenities that we'd like to provide and we found that R-40 was to dense but 25 units per acre with a restrictive covenant on the R-40 wo~~ld work well for us. The site we feel is located close to the downtown which is a good location for multi- family housing. It's close to the shopping and we feel that it would work well both for the City and for our project. tPresented drawings and explained to Council - see tape) Our • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 18, 1443 PAGE 14 ingi^ess and egress will be taken off of James Court and off of Meridian Road, we've been working with the property owner to the north for an access point het^e - shown on map. We can easily access off- into James Court should that become a Collector. We're working with ACRD and the Hunemiller project to the south of us. We've agreed to participate equally in the creation of a Collector Sti^eet. I have been speaking with the attorney for James Court, although he has not got a firm answer from his clients yet. I believe we can pt^ovide a nice Collector here. After we dedicate the easement that ACRD will need for right of way we'll end up with about 6.4 acres which if our rezone is approved would give us approximately 16~ units maximum. We would phase that in two phases starting next summer. First phase will be approximately 80 units and approximately 8~ in the near future. We would request that you apps^ove the rezone and the annexation tonight and if you have any questions I'd be happy to answer^ them. Giesler^: Vou say that you've built this type of project in Boise, could you give me the names of those please? Huber: We're building this particular project at the cornet^ of Ustick and Five Mile Road and it's called West Ridge Apat^tments. These at^e going to be high end, upscale apartments with lots of amenities. Gieslez^: You don't have anything completed in Boise at this time? Huber: No. The Cherry Lane Apat^tments here we have built. Giesler: Could you tell me what the square footage of these ~~nits at^e going to be and the price range? Huber: I'd like Mr. Angel to address those particular questions. Tol sma: Qt-est i oned d~^awing. that go around this project? These at^e all ACRD public streets Huber: Correct. Tolsma: How would the people feel about having their garages across the street ft^om the apartment their living in? Hubei^: Thet^e are carport s and garages. Thi s i s a concept ual plan. {explained - see tape) • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY LA, 1993 RAGE 1~ Corrie: The roads on the inside it shows here will not be dedicated ACRD roadways. Huber: No. Corrie: So in other wot^ds if we have a fire in there, people are pat^ked in then^e, we can't get the trucks in there, there's nothing we can do about it. Huber: No then^e will be an access here and two access here. tShown on drawing) This plan has been approved by the Boise Fire Department and I believe would meet any standard that the Meridian Fire Department would wish there. Corrie: We've run into problems with parking. We can't regulate the parking in there. Concerns about roads not being dedicated. Huber: We would wish to come back to you with our final plan and have that approved by your Fire Department. Crookston: If I remember correctly Mr. Huber, you indicated at the Planning and Zaning Commission meeting that the pool and I think you mentioned one other amenity would be completed in the first phase. Huber: That's correct. Crookston: What total amenities would be included in that fit^st phase? Hubei^: We'd put all of the amenities in the first phase. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Pob Angel, 3°i Horizon Drive, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Angel: I'll be happy to take any questions on specifics if you'd 1 i ke. Giesler: Are you involved in the project that he spoke about at Ustick and Five Mile? Angel: Yes sir. • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 18, 1993 RAGE 16 Giesler: My other q~~estions were the square footage of the apartments and the price range and whether then^e basically a low income apartment. Angel: They ar^e not a low income apartment. The average unit mix is going to be split as follows: First phase would be 80 tirnits of which the mix would be approximately 50X - one bedroom units, 40X - two bedr^oom units and 8 - 3 bedroom units which would represent approximately 10X. The square footage of the one bedroom units are around 700 Sq. feet. Our two bedroom units of which they^e are two floor plans will average about 925 square feet and our three beds^oom apartments will be 1075 square feet. The anticipated rental ranges for the one bedroom units will be in the area of X500.00 per month. The two bedroom units will average around 5575.00 to sE,00.00 with the two floor plans, and the three bedroom units will be at 5700.Q10 per month. Kingsfor^d: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Doris Bar^rett, 7920 W. Apache, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Parrett: tpresented each Council member with handout) We just r^ecently purchased the property at 2250 N. Meridian Rd., which is .just north of the complex that is being discussed tonight. I have sever^al concerns. First of all when we wet^e in the process of purchasing the property that we currently own, we were told that this was going to be a development of single level, single family dwellings. Not until probably one to two days before closing did I contact Mr. Forrey and he advised me that it was going to be an apartment complex. I've got sever^al concerns, one is, is that I have spoke with Jeff Huber he does want to purchase a portion of our proper^ty to make an existing road down through, you- know to access his apartments. We have not come to any conclusion of that and I've not made any decision. I'm not sure I want a roadway running adjacent to our property. I'm concerned that as you look at your drawing, the portion I've highlighted, that then^e be a proper screen, hopefully a block wall of at least six foot. The thought of putting some speed bumps to slow down the traffic a little bit. Jeff Huber again has advised us that the carports were going to be on the outer surrounding area of that project which I guess is okay. I feel that the density is extremely high. We have a ditch and I'm asking that that be tiled. I do have concerns about the project. I did ask for a conceptual drawing and I have not receive that. Giesler: Whet^e is this ditch located that yo-.ir concerned about having tiled? • MERIDIAN CITY COLINCLL MAY lA, 1993 RAGE 17 • Barrett: It's located right along this property line. Actually it's running along this property line - shown on map. Gies 1 et^: It' s not on your property, it' s on theirs? Pat^rett : I' m not sure. Kingsfot^d: We do have a requirement in the City that all ditches be tiled, so it is an Ordinance we would deal with. How many acres i s your pt^opert y? Barrett: 3 acres. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Jeff Huber: I have met with Mrs. Barrett and I have assured her that we would do proper screening around the entire project as well as take some extra care around where her house adjoins the property. He-^ house is rather large and her garage actually sits closest to our project and I think that there isn't going to be any more noise created from our project than is on Meridian Road. We are mare than willing to the the ditches and work with Mrs. Barrett in any way we can to alleviate any concerns she has. The garages that will be on our project will be solid garages facing the outside and where we have an open parking area there will be a six foot fence between thet^e. Cowie: How far along are you on the West Ridge Apartments? Huber^: Their about 40X complete right now. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Pecky Bowcutt: Briggs Engineering, 1111 S. Orchard, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Bowcutt: I'm here on behalf of the developers to the south. As you know this has been an on-going thing concerning James Court, which is currently private road and future access to the interior of this section. One of your main concerns is that access be provided to that interior because they don't have adequate access except for same linkage up to Blue Heron Lane, which is also private. I have provided a new drawing for Mr. Angel and Mr. Huber^. The on e. that was discussed at a previous Council Meeting • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY L8, 1993 RAGE 18 showed a little curvature to the road to give it a non-continuous Collector type look which ACRD prefers. But after discussing it with them, they were concerned about the width on their parcel and asked us to bear a little additional right of way, so we did revise our plan. We did not loose ,any units, we just went straight out and are beat^ing 30 feet. I talked with Mr. Sale at ACHD this morning he said b0 feet of right of way will be sufficient to provide a Collector for that interior. Basically I know there are probably some concerns about the density of this project to the north, however one thing that you need to take into consideration is the overall density for that particular vicinity. What you've got then^e with the James Court Apartments is approximately 58 units, they are on 5.834 acres. Then what we are proposing to the south of this project is 72 units on 5.89 acres and then they have, according to ACRD it's 7. 4. If you take the units that they at^e proposing, the units that we are proposing to the south, the existing units of James Court, your density is around 16 units to the acre. One reason is, like our particular development is only going to be 12.2 dwelling units per acre because we've had to decrease it due to the necessary right of way for the Collector. When-you take a look at that and look at that vicinity, the ~5 units per acre density that they are pt^oposing, in reality would not tt^anslate into that if you look at the adjacent parcels with the similar type development either proposed or existing. We'd like you to basically consider the application and vote to approve it. We think that this particular area will benefit because that will translate into that Collector being built. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Craig Rhom, 330 Cranmer, was swo-^n by the attorney. Rhom: When does the public get to see the draft? How can we get our hands on it to look at before a bunch of leg work is done and approved so we can voice our opposition to it. Kingsford: It's a concept drawing so fai^ they are not .completed so certainly they at^e not tied to that. As soon as those things have been submitted to us they will be available her^e at City Hall. Rhom: Is there a certain time after this hearing that it will be available? • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 18, 1993 PAGE 1~ Kingsford: It's just an annexation and zoning request at this point. As soon as they get ready to da their project there then we'd have those available. Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Greg Bond, ~c8 Ct^anmer Drive, was sworn . by the attorney. Bond: We do have some concerns being in the other subdivision across the way, about traffic on Meridian Road. We would like to see as little density along that road as possible. Concerns stated about values of homes being decreased and additional traffic. Kingsford: Anyone else? No response. I will close the public hearing. Counselor is there a difference in the testimony? Crookston: Thet^e are not but there might be some changes that we need to make on the Conclusions and the requirements that pertain to the garages and the screening. The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Corrie to have the attorney review and prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on this request for annexation and zoning. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #6: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING TO R-8 WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT, PHEASANT POINTE SUBDIVISION: Kingsford: At this time I'll open the Public Hearing and invite the ownei^ or representative to begin. ,Iim Merkle, Hubble Engineering, was sworn by the attorney. Merkle: This annexation application and preliminary plat application is proposed for the southwest corner of Locust Grove. Locust Grove on the east and Ustick on the north. To the south of us is the Tract Subdivision. We are contiguous with the City corporate limits along this piece of property which is known as the Borup parcel tshown on map). We are proposing R-B zoning for the entire 44 acres. That is consistent with the existing zoning of the Tract Subdivision to the south and additional subdivisions on the east side of Locust Grove in this area. This proposed subdivision contains 9~ single family residential lots on approximately 27 1/2 acres which gives you a density of • • MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING MAY 11, 1993 PAGE 3 The Motion was made by Hepper and seconded by Shearer that the Mer~idian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Roll Call Vote: Hepper^ - Yea; Rountt^ee - Yea; Shear^er - Yea; Al id.jani - Yea; Motion Carried: All Yea: The Motion was made by Hepper and seconded by Shearer that the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning requested by the applicant, for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and that the applicants be specifically required to the all ditches, canals and water^ways as a condition of annexation, and that the applicants meet all the Ordinances of the City of Meridian specifically including the development time requirements. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #5: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST HY HIMERICH AND DORADO DEVELOPMENT: Johnson: Any discussion? No response. The Motion was made by Rountree and seconded by Shearer that the Meridian F~lanning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and appr^oves these Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law. Roll Call Vote: Hepper - Yea; Rountr^ee - Yea; Shear^er - Yea; Al id,jani - Yea; Motion Car^ried: All Yea: The Motion was made by Rountree and seconded by Shearer that the Mer^idian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning requested by the applicant for the party described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law in compliance with the Ordinances of the City of Mer^idian. Motion Car^ried : Al 1 Yea: MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 13, 1993 PAGE 6 Hepper: Is there any landscaping or anything like that proposed? Loveless: Not with the subdivision. Hepper: Over by the main school it shows a pretty large parking area, will that parking be included in there? Loveless: We drew that up to show that we can provide enough space on that site to provide a parking lot for the square footage that exists within that building. Johnson: Do you have any concept regarding the ultimate use of the lots? The application states combination of use. Loveless: We anticipate under the R-15 zone probably a potential multi-family development or some sort. We have no plans for one at this stage now. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Bill Brewer, 105 E. Carlton Ave., was sworn by the attorney. Brewer: As many of you know our property consists of a mortuary across the street. We've been at that location since 1957 and I go have an on going interest in what occurs with the school property over there. In watching and keeping up with the property I still cannot help but believe that the greatest potential for that property would be that it remain in one piece. A nice large piece of property that could truly be usable for something down the road. (Further explanation - see tape) Johnson: Anyone else? No response. I will close the Public Hearing. (Discussion Held - see tape) The Motion was made by Hepper to approve the preliminary plat - motion died for lack of 2nd. To be scheduled for next Planning and Zoning Meeting. ITEM #6: PUBLIC HEARING: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST BY HIMERICH & DORADO DEVELOPMENT: Johnson: I will open the Public Hearing. Is there someone representing the applicant? ~ ~ MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING APRIL 13, 1993 PAGE 7 Jeff Huber, 1109 Leadville Ave., Boise, representin g Dorado Development, was sworn by the attorney. Huber: We have an application before you tonight to annex and rezone some property on Meridian Road. We're not asking for specific approval tonight. There was sortie confusion in the staff report as to the site plan fitting the property. It's a conceptual plan that we added to our application to show the City what we had in mind for that particular piece of property. Another item in Mr. Smith's comments in your staff report referred to the annexation of the house parcel on the property. This is an oversight on our part and we'd be more than happy to add that to the annexation prior to the City Council Hearing. We envisions a lot of growth in Meridian occurring over the next few years and we envision a need for multi-family housing. We'd like to build a project here that Meridian would be proud of. (Presented pictures to Commission Members) We're requesting that we receive a zoning designation of R-40 with a restrictive covenant for 25 units per acre instead of 40 per acre. In order for use to build a quality project like this with all these amenities, we plan to have a basketball court, a volleyball court, a swimming pool, and playground s for children (Explained further - see tape) -In order for us to build a quality project like this we need a higher density than the R-15 would allow and we don't need the density that an R-40 would allow. So we are requesting that the developer enter into a development agreement with the City that we would be restricted to a maximum of 25 units per acre. Johnson: On this conceptual, it looks almost identical to the N. Five Mile. Huber: It is. It's the very same plan that we are using over there. We are working with the Ada County Highway District regarding the Collector Street now and the adjoining property owners. Ultimately I think the decision will be up to the Ada County Commission's. If we cannot locate a Collector there we would access this project off of Meridian Road. Are there any questions? Hepper: Is this the concept of what you have in mind out there or is this actually what you plan on doing? Huber: This is actually what we would plan on doing but at this present time we're not asking for conditional use approval. We are sharing with you a concept of what we want to build there. MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING APRIL 13, 1993 PAGE 8 Hepper: How many units would be involved? Huber: At 25 per acre, we would be in the neighborhood of 175 units. Hepper: Would you build to that density to the 25 per acre? Huber: Once the Collector issue is settled we would have to lay it out and I don't think that we quite get to that density. Hepper: Would you do this in phases or all at one time? Huber: I think I'd have to defer that question to Dorado Development for that. I think we might phase it depending on the demand, in two phases maximum. Hepper: Do you have an idea on the time frame of those phases? Huber: Mr. Angel from Dorado Development will address those issues. Johnson: Any other questions for Mr. Huber? To clarify your earlier comment then, your agreeable to some sort of restriction imposed by the City to the 25 density or less per acre. Huber: Yes. Johnson: Anyone else from the public? Robert R. Angel, 35 Horizon Drive, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Angel: There were a couple of questions with regard to the phasing or the density that maybe I could answer. Our company came to Meridian a little bit over a year and a half ago and constructed what we call the Cherry Lane Apartments. We felt that the one thing that maybe would be lacking would be a top flight apartment project with amenities. We are also aware of the fact that it is a small market, the multi family market is very strong as everybody knows all over the Treasure Valley. For a project in this size we had contemplated doing it in two phases. We would go ahead and put in all our improvements. The first phase not less than 75 to 80 units. The second phase would be the balance of the property. In terms of timeliness, I would say not later than spring of 1994 to begin construction. Any questions? • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION .APRIL 13, 1993 PAGE 9 Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? • Raleigh Hawe, 530 Blue Heron Lane, was sworn by the attorney. Howe: I own the property to the east of this development and I have no adverse comments about the designs that are being proposed. However I am interested in the proposed Collector that is an east west Collector on the south side of this particular property. As I have testified in the meetings prior to this on the properties to the south of there conceptual project here I find it a necessity to have a Collector through that area to serve the properties to the east and to connect to the streets adjoining my easterly boundaries of my property. With the numbers of people that are in this. particular area and are proposed to be in this area, a Collector for the services that are required for this particular project and the ones adjacent to it including these properties to the east for fire services, emergency services and traffic movement, the Collector area should be a required situation in that particular area. That Collector will serve the Willowbrook Street and I believe it's now called Blue Heron Street on the east side of the properties that I have. This service of course will involve not only the general services of emergency, the fire, police, etc. but it will serve the traffic movement to Meridian Road. Are there any questions? Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? Larry Sale, 316 E. 37th Street, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Sale: I'm the development .services supervisor for the Ada County Highway District. In our review of this application and the review of the previous application by Bridgewood Subdivision, which is just immediately east of this parcel the Highway District imposed a condition for the preparation of the traffic study between these two properties and the dedication of a Collector standard street from Meridian Road to the East boundary of these properties. On behalf of the Commission, I urge your inclusions of our recommendations in your Findings and pass those on to the City Council for their consideration. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? No response. I will close the Public Hearing. The Motion was made by Johnson and seconded by Alidjani to have the attorney prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Motion Carried: All Yea: