Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Salmon Rapids Subdivision No. 4
CITY OF MERIDIAN 3 East Idaho Street, Meridian, ID 8 2 Phone: (208) 888-4433 Fax: (20$) $$7-4$13 MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION APPLICANT: F/,tX VI~P~ ~-~~.C ~~~s Phone: ~ggbl ADDRESS: `-~~U 1N ~ S~~ ~~~e l ~ a-~~ ~ ~ ~~03 OWNER ~Ol-1( ~ ~ l/~ ~ ~/l-.~ f ~ Pht~ne: 3 0 g o~ q ADDRESS: `~ J J~ IIIJ • GJ~~~i ~d~, ~~(/W~? _ b ~~~ GENERAL LOCATIONS • ~~ Sf ~~~~ qtr ~ai~ d. 1 U LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: ~-~~,~~d X-~ ~ DESCRIPTION AND/OR NATURE OF APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC f•~ARYIVG: m ~ r~ o~ed r ~- u re v~ ~rus yy! -` Gt.r (n y2 ~ ~ rte 5~7~~ dUrnos~h~'~ Q i1 ~ vn a hor c -f-~. O ~ 5 ~ ,~ i t.~ UL`C..e'~ ~ .~ C~e.~~ i~i'1 ~~ `'»~I ~ r a p ~ ,~a~ F HIP R VALID OPTI N: A copy of your property deed or option ~U agreement must be attached. PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION: ~ ~ ~ `~ VICINITY SKETCH: A vicinity map and/or site plan at a scale approved by the City showing property lines, existing streets, easements, and such other items as the City may require (3~ copies). SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS: A list of all property owners and addresses (from authentic tax records of Ada County) within, contiguous to, directly across the street from, and within a 300' radius of the ~d-~veea~tto~n must be attached. ~,V~' r ~ ~ Fee: $200.0(1 ~•• $`t:~l~aoticelpraperty owner to receive notice + publication costs I hereby certify that the information contained herein is true and correct. t also certify that I will post the property 1 week before each public hearing. SiGNATUR,E: ~-.~~- *~~ TOTAL PAGE. X11 :+.~~ ~`: _ CERTIFICATE OF OWNERS f11NN ALl MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: ~~,T.-_FARWEST LL.C., AtJ IDAHO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDEf~ ~E LAWS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT IT IS THE OWNER OF THE REAL ,OPERTY AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND IT IS IT'S INTENTION TO INCLUDE SAID REAL PROPEF~TY :THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT. THE OWNER ALSO HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT THIS PLAT COMPLIES Y!i IDAHO CODE 50-1334 (2). .ALL LOTS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION WILL RECEIVE DOMESTIC ATER FROM AN EY!rT!r•~G WATER SYSTEM AND THE CITY OF MERIDIAN HAS AGREED IN WRITING SERVE AlL THE LOTS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION. ;PARCEL OF LAND 6EING A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 . AST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED 5 FOLLOWS: k~,c :GINNING AT A FOU ND 5/8" In01•I PIN MARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 19, TUWNSFiIP NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., THENCE N 00'44'49" E 984.53 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE , 89'24'26" W 45.00 FEET TO A f?OINT ON THE PROPOSED WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SOUTH OUST GROVE ROAD, THE INITIAL '..POINT OF THIS SUBDIVISION; ~ENCE N 89'24'26" W 659.06 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY UNE OF KACHINA ESTATES TO A ~;,~~;~ 'POIN T; ' FENCE N 00'35'34" .T TO A POINT; E 172.95 FEE FENCE S 90'00'00" W 54.86 FEET TO A POINT; FENCE N 00'00'00" E 80.00 FEET TO A POINT; FENCE N 29'24'52" W 90.51 FEET TO A POINT; ~~NCE N 39'07'12" W 282.54 FEET TO A POINT; FENCE N 89'02'11" W 160.00 FEET TO A POINT; FENCE N 00'57'49" E 11.30 FEET TO A POINT; iENCE N 89'02 11 W 174.34 FEET TO A POINT%:ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF KACHINA ESTATE; FENCE N 00'10'10" E 237.23 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER "OF SALMON RAPIDS SUBDIVISION N0.3; _ONG THE BOUNDARIES OF SALMON RAPIDS SUBDIVISION N0. 1, N0. 2 AND N0. 3 THE FOLLOWING: FENCE N 89'42'00" E 176.67 FEET TO A POINT; FENCE N 76'55'00" E 179.42 FEfiT TO A POINT;. FENCE N 83'43'00" E 91.41 FEET' TO A POINT; FENCE S 38'30'00" E 160.00 FEET TO A POINT; FENCE N 51'30'00" E 124.86 FEET TO A POINT; FENCE S 38'30'13" E 35.84 FEET TO A POINT; FENCE N 51'30'00" E 203.05 FEET TO A POINT; FENCE S 38'29'53" E 416.88 FEET" TO A POINT;. FENCE S 49'20'00" E 150.00 FEET TO A POINT; FENCE S 44'00'00" E 38.00 FEET TO A POINT; =~ t;ENCE S 31'00'00" E 48.00 FEET TO A POINT; FENCE S 17'15'00" E 153.65 FEETTO A POINT';ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTH ~; LOCUST GROVE ROAD; :AVING S IENCE S AID BOUNDARIES; 00'44'49" W 275.34 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT; ' E INITIAL POINT OF THIS SUBDIVISION CONTAINING 15.55 HENCE N 89 24 26 W 20.00 FEET. TO TH ACRES, MORE OR LESS. , ~~ ~~ iHE' PUBLIC STREETS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE-=HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC AND THE EASEMENTS INDICATED ON SAID PLAT ARE NOT <DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC, BUT THE RIGHT TO USE SAID EASEMENTS IS HEREBY RESERVED FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND FOR ANY OTHER USES AS DESIGNATED HEREON, AND NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES ARE. TO BE ERECTED WITHIN THE LINES OF SAID'EASEMENTS. ; ; {N WITNESS WHEREOF, WE HAVE H~REUNTO SETS-,OUR HANDS THIS DAY OF .FARWEST L.L.C. S 19_1_ .~ ~lSi, .. - .iVf .~ N 1 _ P.01 M ~ ' "~' , .~ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF TWIN FALLS T ` ~. .. ' ~ ~.,,NOTYCE OF CLAIM TO A WATER RIGHT ' ' ~ ~ ~ ''; ACQUIRED UNDER STATE LAW IN RE TT~E GENERAL ADJUDICATION CIVIL CASE NUMBER: 39576 OF RIGHTS TO THE USE OF WATER FROM THE SNAKE RIVER BASIN WATER SYSTEM. °' \ f{1~ f' ~ ~ ~°~ '- i %~1 tid / Ident. Number: A63-18714 ~~ '' y .; ~ ~, Date Received: 9/ 8/1989 z;, o~ l ;; ( Receipt No: W005707 ~,: ! ` ' 3 Received By: 1. Name: FARWEST LLC Address: 4550 W STATE ST BOISE ID 83703 2. Date of Priority: DEC 31, 1941 3. Source: GROUNDWATER Trib. to: 4. Point of Diversion: Town:~hip Range Section 1/4 of 1/4 of 1/4 Lot 03N OlE 19 NE SE County ADA 5. Description of diverting works: 2a0' BEEP, 4" CASING, SUB. PUMP, PIPED TO HOME AND BARN 6. Water is used for the following purposes: Purpose From To C.F.S (or) A.F.A. DOMESTIC 07./01 12/31 0.040 STOCKWATER O1/O1 12/31 0.030 7. Totztl Quantity Appropriated is: 0.070 C.F.S. (and/or) A.P.A. 8. Total consumptive use is Acre Feet Per Annum. 9. Non-irrigation uses: DOMESTIC, 1 HOME; STOCKWATER, UP TO 100 HEAD BEEF CATTLE 10. Place of Use: Township Range SectJ~on 1/4 of 1/4 Lot Use Acres 03N OlE 19 NE SE DOMEST NE SE STOCK A63-18714 1 APR 08 '98 14:43 to 1 pq~ ' tb From Co./Dep Ul^-Q,~ CO. Phone ~ Phone # ~ Q _ DI C~ Fax Y ~ _ j ZJ Fax p W - i~ r Page Date:. 05/22/95 205-338-9708 PAGE.01 • • 11. Place of use in counties: ADA 12. bo you own the property listed above as place of use? YES 13. Other Water Rights Used: A63-02968, NAMPA-MERIDIAN 14. Remarks: OWNERSHIP CHANGED BY LH 5/22/95. 15. Basis of Claim: BENEFICIAL USE P.02 16. Signature(s) (a.) By signing below, I/we acknowledge that I/We have received, read and understand the form entitled "How you will receive notice in the snake River Basin Adjudication.' (b.) I/We do do not wish to receive and pay a small annual fee for monthly copies of the docket sheet. Number of attachments: For Individuals: I/we do solemnly swear or affirm that the statements contained in the foregoing document are true and correct. Signature of Claimant(s): ~, ~~ Date: ~• 1 ;..~ ~\ ', Date: ~.fE a ~• •. State of Idaho ) ~~'~`E ~~;~ County of ) :: ~,~ 1 1 , . -_~ '~ ~ ; Subscribed and sworn (or aff3r'med),.;pe~ox~e .me .this ,~ day of 19 ... y, '' '~.~,•< '~ • `' •f ~ Notary Public Seal Residing at A63-18714 Page APR 08 '98 14 44 My Commission Expires 2 Date:~ 05/22/95 PAGE.02 .,,~. r• 3• +, r. r ~~ ~~ ~ • L J 03 :'r 1`~ 1. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF TWIN FALLS IN RE THE GENERAL ADJUDICATION CIVIL CASE NUMBER: 39576 OF RIGHTS TO THE USE OF WATER FROM THE SNAKE RIVER BASIN WATER SYSTEM. ;" ~~ ~" i ! ~,,~~~~ Ident. Number: A63-02968 ' ~ ~ 0}/ Date Received: 9/ 8/1989 Receipt No: W005707 ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ Received By: o ' ' ~ : ' ~ ,. ~;, ~ NOTICE OF CLAIM TO A WATER RIGHT '~ 1 ' ~ ACQUIRED UNDER STATE LAW 1. Name: FARWEST LLC 208-338-9708 Address: 4550 W STATE ST BOISE ID 83703 2. Date of Priority: NOV 19, 1953 3. Source: GROUNDWATER Trib. to: 4. Point of Diversion: Township Range Section 1/4 of 1/4 of 1/4 Lot county 03N OlE 19 NE SE ADA 5. Description of diverting works: 80' DEEP, 8" CASING, SUB. PUMP, GATED PIPE, GRAVITY FLOWS 6. Watex is used for the following purposes: Purpose From To C.F.S (or) A.F.A. IRRIGATION 03/15 11/15 0.460 7. Total Quantity Appropriated is: 0.460 C.F.S. (and/or) A.F.A. 8. Total consumptive use is Acre Feet Per Annum. 9. Non--irrigation uses: NONE l0. Plac:e of Use: Township Range Section 1/4 of 1/4 Lot Use 03N OlE 19 NE SE Acres IRR 23.0 A63-02968 Page 1 Date: 05/22/95 ;~.~ ,~ r,.l ,~ ;3 APR 08 '98 1444 ~ - - !~« PAGE.03 .~ • 10. Place of Use: continued Township Range Section P.04 ..... ... . ,,.V7pF~ r: • ,. 1/4 of 1/4 Lot Use Acres Section Acres 23.0 Total Acres 23.0 11. Place of use in counties: ADA 12. Do you own the property listed above as place of use? YES 13. Other Water Rights Used: A63-18714 14. Remarks: OWNERSHIP CHANGED BY LH 5/22/95. 15. Basis of Claim: LICENSE Water Right Number: 24584 16. signature(s) (a.) By signing below, I/We acknowledge that I/We have received, read and understand the form entitled "How you will receive notice in the Snake River Basin Adjudication." (b.) I/We do do not wish to receive and pay a small annual fee for monthly copies of the docket sheet. Number of attachments: For Individuals: t~~t j I/We do solemnly swear or affirm that the~;statem'ents contained in the foregoing document are true and coX~e`ctt. ~` < < . Signature of Claimant (s) .i !~`` 1' ~~ ~ Date: ~~ ' ~ ", ~ ~`• Date : A63-02968 Page 2 Date: 05/22/95 ..„:., APR 08 '98 14 45 PAGE.04 P _ 05 ~edti - .. ' • • ~• State of Idaho County of ; SS . .\ ~ ~ ~ Subscribed and sworn (or ,,aff i~rme~i) k~e~~re me~~, this day of 19 ~~ °ti,, ~1.,. ~` ~ ; -, Notary Public Seal • . ~ , .~ •x • ~ ~ ' ~~ Residing at ~~ ~~.. My Commission Expires A63-02968 Page 3 Date: 05/22/95 ~" APR 08 '98 14.45 _ ~ PAGE.05 i February 18, 1998 } • ! • ~ ~~ . C BRIGGS ~. } ~ ING i ~~ ,. i ., ;~ M'r. Will Berg Meridian City 33: I~. Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~~~~ FL ~) ~ ~aa~ h U'"` ~° s ~ ~ '^ 0~Q w ~~ Imo' SS ~ ~ Re: Salmon Rapids No. 4 Subdivision ~ I U`" p ~" ' ~ ~ '~~ i ,~_~ pp ~S Dbar VI~'ill: ! ~1'"` d a~Q . ~~ ~ ~ ~ Ibis is a formal request for a public hearing before the Meridian Ciry Council. The applicant, Fatwest Developers, intends toi convey ownership of the Salmon Rapids irrigation well to Nampa Meridian Irrigation District. The District has concerns about the monitoring regwirements imposed on the well by the City Counci~ when the project was approved as a preliminary plat. Gary Smith has indicated the removal of requirements caa only be accomplished;in apublic hearilag where IIO~ ~ ~" given ~ all Pro ~ ~ owners within 300 feet. A current List of properties within 300 febt of Salmon Rapids #4 has been provided, 1'he applicant will pay for notification and all cost incurred for the public hearing.; Please schedule this item for a public hearing before the City Council. Sincerely, f BRIGGS ENGINEERING, Inci B~cicy Bowc Project BLB:rm ~ ~ Enclosure: 1. Property owners list. t ~: ~ i j , I ' 9605151berg.ltr I ' 1111 S. Orchard, Suite 600 • Boise, Idaho 83705 • (208) 344-9700 Fax# (208) 345-2950 i FEB 18 '98 1449 PAGE. • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: JANUARY 6 1998 APPLICANT: ITEM NUMBER: REQUEST: DISCUSSION OF WELL IN SALMON RAPIDS SUBDNISION N0.4 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS ~V is~'~ ~" (~ "t ~~,~~~~ C~~ e~° ,~~ (~ I` I~ ~~ 4~ u „w ,e~"" OTHER: ~J~ All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. 'v ~~•Lr7 .~ oV~ ~,..~.,, . ~.. ~,• .. ,..,, ... ~ ..,.. . . '3 C Ij .,~ . c, ..: ~ '1. .~~ T?I x<: December 24, 1997 a: eT f C~ Will Berg Meridian City 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Ydaho 83642 RE: Well located in Salmon Rapids No Will. 4 ~~~ a ~ ~ a a ~~~ C~'CY U~' 1~IAI~ Over the last few months we have been trying to turn ownership of a Pressurized irrigation System to NMID. In doing so, I need to be on the next City Council agenda to work out some restrictions that the City Council had stipulated. Please let me know when we are on the agenda for this issue. Have a Merry Christmas. Tha k you, ~ 1 ~ ~~~ ~~ Kim Kinney Farwest Developers ~ ;;S' . ~~. ~; .t 4• T.3.. +Y r, h. -~ ~.~, i &~I~~ .__.__. .,__... ..~. . DEC 24 '97 13 37 ~.~ P. 01 a4 .t ., a~ s .:~rJC, .~dit~o A.ljO.p ~~'Ori` 3,Yr1=9106 ~icz:• ~.P0~9~ ~!.1'r!'JJ90 PAGE.01 n • ry:. Edward Squires Hydrogeologist 1530 Knights Drive, Boise, ID 83712 (208) 342-8369 Mr. Gary D. Smith, P.E. City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Gary: 11 September, 1996 I have looked into the circumstances surrounding the Goldsmith well to be used for pressurized irrigation of the Salmon Rapids and Los Alamitos Subdivisions. We have coordinated with Mike Teschner, of Mtn. Landscaping, to investigate the well and to recommend a monitoring plan for the well as required by the Meridian City Council. It is our understanding that Mtn. Landscaping is representing the developer, Marty Goldsmith, of Far West Development. Summary Details of well construction and production history are incomplete for the "Goldsmith" well. Available data suggest that the well is relatively shallow and may be in hydraulic connection with surface water sources. The well is not difficult to measure under pumping or non-pumping conditions and is equipped adequately for measuring water-level, flow rate, and total production. The neazby Babbitt and Shipley wells have been selected as observation wells to measure possible interference effects from Goldsmith well pumping. The two wells are of similar depth, are in close proximity to the Goldsmith well, and are owned by the two most interested parties to the dispute. A monthly monitoring program has been recommended for the first year to obtain baseline d~ The frequency of measurements should be re-evaluated after year one and probably reduced. It is unlikely that the Goldsmith well will cause adverse effects to local area water levels, however, total gallons pumped must be reported to evaluate conditioned restrictions of the water right. Mtn. Landscaping has the necessary experience and equipment to obtain the necessary measurements to be reported to City of Meridian. History There is not a Driller's Record on file with the Idaho Department of Water Resources which matches the location or size of the 8-inch diameter irrigation well, hereinafter referred to as the "Goldsmith" well. The well has reportedly been in existence for many years and had been previously used to irrigate the croplands surrounding the well. Water Right 63- 02968 is associated with the well and has a priority date of 1953 for irrigation of 23 acres. The original Right, under the name of Thomas P. Gray, is volumetrically limited to 103.5 acre feet per annum and has a rate of flow restriction of .46 cubic feet per second (206.44 gpm). Period of Use is from Mazch 15-to-Nov. 15. ...~ • .~. ~.i This Water Right is a "supplemental" right which is to say that it may be used as a "back- up" in years when surface water rights may not be available or aze reduced. The supplemental nature of the original right is associated with the way in which the water was historically used. A Transfer of Water Right, approved June 22, 1995, is formally conditioned that the new owner, Far West Development, shall use their full allotment of surface water rights prior to use of groundwater rights. A neighbor, Gene Babbitt, recalled that, "the Goldsmith well was drilled in 1964 for the landowner, Jerry McDermott, who farmed 50 acres using a combination of canal water and groundwater from the well". Babbitt thought the well was originally drilled to 130 feet by Randall Drilling of Meridian. Although Darrell Randall did drill many of the local area wells, there is not a record of an 8-inch McDermott well in the IDWR files. It is not entirely clear whether this is the original well drilled in the 1950's, if this is a replacement well drilled by McDermott, or if the well was drilled more recently than the water-right, as a supplemental well in times of limited surface water supply. It is likely that some of these questions might be answered through an in-depth review of the Water Rights file at IDWR. This is beyond the scope of your request and we have not requested the file Site survey The location of the Goldsmith well is shown on Figure 1 to be in the SE, NE, SE 1/4 of Section 19, T3N, R1E just south of the Eightmile Lateral where it crosses Locust Grove Road. An 8-inch steel casing extends 1.2 feet above the pumphouse floor (Figure 2) which is essentially ground level. The existing pump is a 300 gpm Crown 6H-300 submersible pump with 4-stages on a 20 HP Franklin motor installed by Burgess Pump Co. The pump is equipped with an Associated Coil variable frequency drive, a measuring port, an airline, and a 4-inch McCrometer (MW-500) flowmeter. This is an inline propeller flowmeter prefabricated inside of a flanged length of pipe with flow vanes. According to John Burgess, the total depth of the well was 71 feet below top of casing at the time of pump installation.. On July 1, 1996, Jeff Allred attempted to plumb the total depth of the well, with the pump installed, and could not lower a weighted steel tape below 76.5 feet. He pulled out and measured 57 feet of airline which was reinstalled in the well and the air gage calibrated to sounded water levels. The pumping and static water-levels aze not difficult to measure with either steel or electric well sounders. On this date, Jeff measured pumping water-level at 15:19 hours at 35.40 feet below top of casing with the well pumping at 120 gpm. Totalizer read 7,330,000 gallons at the time of this measurement. The pump is set to operate between 40-and-65 lb. of pressure. From a previous reading of 5,574,800 gallons on June 10, 1996 at 14:00 hr., an average pumping rate of 57 gpm is calculated fora 21 day period (exactly 21 days, 1 hour and 17 minutes; 30,317 min.) of time. A static water-level for the Goldsmith well was not obtained because the well was in use during both of our site visits. Mtn. Landscaping measurements aze typically taken ~ ~ l~ only a few minutes after turning off the pump and, so, are not representative of complete recovery. Discussions with Mike Teschner indicate that the well does not draw down appreciably (<g feet) at typical pumping rates. Pumping water-level measurements taken while the dischazge rate fluctuated between 20'and 100 gpm show that less than 3 feet of water-level fluctuation occurs. Although the pump is capable of producing 300 gpm, the well does not apparently pump at higher rates for long, as evidenced by the 57 gpm average dischazge rate. The maximum discharge rate observed has been 120 gpm and this was for less than 2 minutes. Mtn. Landscaping appears to be doing an adequate job of monitoring and our measurements aze consistent with theirs. We understand that Mtn. Landscaping will report on their monitoring to the Meridian City Engineer's Office. Mtn. Landscaping's measurements to date are included as Attachment A. Likelihood of well interference and recommended frequency of monitoring. The Babbitt and Shipley wells (Figure 1) are a good choice for monitoring the influence on local groundwater levels. In addition to being near the Goldsmith well and completed to similaz depths, these wells belong to the parties concerned about possible impact from the Goldsmith well pumping. We recommend monthly monitoring of water- ~evel, total production, and dischazge rate (if pumping) for the Goldsmith, Babbitt, and Shipley wells over the course of a veaz so that the seasonal groundwater fluctuation can be quantified and separated from possible interference effects and to establish baseline water-levels for the monitoring wells. Once a data has been accumulated for a year, monitoring frequency of the observation wells could be relaxed to one or two measurements per year. The Goldsmith well should be measured monthly through the winter (non-pumping) season for the first yeaz (1996). Of particulaz importance are the pre-irrigation season measurement, taken in eazly Mazch, and the end of season pumping water level, measured in early November. For subsequent veazs, only the early Mazch_an_d early November measurements should be necessary with no winter measurements. We think it unlikely that pumping from the Goldsmith well will adversely impact water-levels in adjacent wells. The shallow depth of the wells and the lack of significant low permeability sediments underlying 40-to-70 feet of Whitney terrace gravels (from driller's reports, Attachment B) strongly suggest that wells less that 150 feet in depth are in hydraulic connection with surface water sources. Owing to the preponderance of surface water courses (Eightmile Lateral,lZidenbaugh Canal, Tenmile Creek, and Fivemile Creek -see Figure 1.) in the immediate vicinity, it is expected that recharge from surface sources imparts a stability to area water levels. This seems to be borne out by water-level measurements to date. Please call with any questions. (1 ~ . o Noce ~-t.-,, .4~.~Y ~P-~.~ Sincerely, ec ~ ~ MI6 D ~d Squires ~Pw`f1 L /lleve~,ge~ ~/o w ~ ~ NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City. of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street,. Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on May 5, 1998, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Farwest Developers, to lift the requirements imposed at a previous public hearing regarding an existing well and the monitoring of the well located in the SE '/4 of Section 19, Township 3 North, Range 1, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located in Salmon Rapids No. 4 Subdivision. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 15th of April, 1998. ~~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., I CLERK PUBLISH April 17 and May 1, 1998. ,,,`~~, ~ u ~e ~++r r r~,~, ~* C)' ~r~° ~: .; r ;, Sr~L y .~ ~ ~ 1 '-, a ~A~,,.`. ~, It n to e e . ~ ~~ to E. 008 AN ST. • ~ .. ,.. Is r le la . r~ Is 12 .. 1~ • ~. 23 z2 19 ie iI ~ g 1 ~~ Z' . ~ s . ' Lfl Z 9 i 4 • • zs s Is ~ ~ y 10 ~ 3_. 1P _ ~ • ~- ~j ~ ~{~ ~ 20NE OR. _~ ~~~ I ~O ~~ 4: 3 ?. ~ :- I. .s s •, 8 9:'. 4 ~ •~~4 , s ~tv,~ p- j 9 ,.or ~ , ~~~ ~''~~ ~~ a i a ~ w .I; ,: u 3 ..... 2jC1`s•fin~ welr/ `nvhi~h,~r~G I 1 6 I 7 ~~ , t~ 1 N<,~~N~~<ft>N ~..t1 ~ .~t ~ ) ~ .. ~---~-- ~ S w, 11 15 ~ . ~ s '~ .. it N s s- r le ~ JAN f TAME ZONE DR.. ~ 2 1 i• i l i s ~ ~ NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on May 5, 1998, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Fannrest Developers, to lift the requirements imposed at a previous public hearing regarding an existing well .and the monitoring of the well located in the SE '/4 of Section 19, Township 3 North, Range 1, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located in Salmon Rapids No. 4 Subdivision. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 15th of April, 1998. ~~ ` WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., I CLERK PUBLISH April 17 and May 1, 1998. ~`1~~,+,u~sr~~ir~~,~,~f, ~r.~ y +, :. w ~L s ~ ~' ,~ w "ice 'fj~ I T ~S'( • ~ rG" ~e~~ ~'''''f,~~~/lilllllf Itlt~~~~~`~``,```~ I 3 a F, ~ ~ 'A . ~ ~ is • 12 a to ~ ~ ~ 8 T t0 E. G08ERMAN ST. ,~ w . le 7 16 Is . 1'1 ,13 12 I' . 23 22 19 ie 17 7 g y. • 24 ' :~ 21 Q~ B d c 20 ? si ` • • 23 S IS 16 ~ 1 ~ A 14 ~ 2 ~~3 Z. .. , L / 9~ ~ 20NE OR. 7~ 0 • i 1 s 0 9:° R ~ 7 `~'~~Q b 8 \~o ~ q ~..~ ~ to la' ,s '~ is 3 •I ~. 2>C"i S~ ~~ Gv e 1 ~ ~n ~ h r~~ h r; r~~c T~ ~. ~~ ~~ s 7 29 N ~rlt 1 "t ~ :1 ~ ... ~~, 1 • ~~ s ~ ~ ;v, ,..o ~, ~~1 16 ~' ' s ~ ~ Z P14R T 7C `, IT rv s s-1' Is f TAME ZONE. DR. ~ 2 ~ l i• i i I~ w \ •'~~ . Z y ,:: JAN ~ FEB-18-1998 14 45 FROM • TO • 8874813 P.01 ,. G B~.~GGS f ~G~1~~ 0 ~ ~ ~~ U lf~U/n1~ VV M 0~1n1L~ ,' ~ TO ~//LC.~ ~~ I FROM '~,G'~ CO~MPaNY 4~ ~~~~<~ BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. FAQ N0. ~ ~ ~ ~ 1111 S. ORCHARD, `SMITE 600 * BASE, ID. 83705 DATE ~ FAX NO.(2os)345-2950 TELE N0:(208)344-9700 N0 ~~OF PAGES SENT ~~ 6EI .PROJECT N0. - (In~fuding. Transmittal} ,! , REFERENCE dd t ~' i REMIARKS ~ i REPLY REQUESTED i COPY i' 1111 S. ORCHARp., SUITE 600 * B01 FEB 18 '98 14 49 IDAHO 83705 ~ (208) 344-9700 FAX NO (208) 345-2950 PAGE.01 FEB-18-1998 14 45 FROM TO • • 1 ~ ~NGINEERpyG _ _ ~RI~CS !NG February 18, 1998 M'r. Will Berg Meridian City 33.1x. Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 8874813 P.02 ~~ ~,~ .~~~ i I ' Re: Salmon Rapids No. 4 Subdivision Dear 'W'ill: ' Tlis is a formal request for a public hearing before the Me7dian City Council. The applicant, F&rwest Developers, intends toy convey ownership of the Salmon Rapids irrigation well to Nampa Meridian Imgation I7istriet. The District has concerns about the monitoring requirements imposed oni the well by the City Council when the project was approved as a preliminary plat. Gary Smith has indicated the removal of thorse requirements can only be accoznplished;in apublic hearing where notice has been liven to all property owners within 300 feet. A current list of properties within 300 felt of Salmon Rapids #4 has been provided. The applicant will pay for notification and a]D cost incurred for the public heazing ~ please schedule this item for a public hearing before the City Council. Sincerely, i BRIGGS ENCrINFEIZING, Inca ,, ;; ' Becky $owc ,Project Manager ~ BLB:rm Enclosure: 1. Property owners list. I i f 960515~bergatr 1111 S. Orchard, Suite 600 • Boise, Idaho 83705 • (208) 344-9700 Fax# (208) 345-2950' FEB 18 '98 14 49 PAGE.02 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL FARWEST DEVELOPERS ANNEXATION AND ZONING N 1/4 SW 1/4 OF SECTION 19, T.3 N., R.1 E., B.M. MERIDIAN, IDAHO SECOND AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The original entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for consideration on August 15, 1995, the City Council having again considered the original Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on October 17, 1995, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the City Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant appearing in the original public hearings through a representative, Marty Goldsmith, the Applicant having now filed a request, more than two years after the original Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on the annexation were adopted, to amend the original Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to change the monitoring of wells which were required, and now having appeared through its representative, Brian F. McColl, and a public hearing having been duly noticed and having been heard on May 5, 1998, and having duly considered the request to amend the original findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Meridian City Council makes the following: SECOND AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That all notices of public hearings on the annexation FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 1 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING ~ ~ and zoning and for the amendment of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were published as required under the Local Planning Act and the public having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence, the City having adopted Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on the original Annexation request, which are incorporated herein as if set forth in full; notice of public hearing on the request to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law having been published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for May 5, 1998, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the request to again amend the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law was duly considered at the May 5, 1998, hearing and the public having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence on the request to amend the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and since copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations, the City Council presents the following new Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That all notices of public hearings on the annexation and zoning and for the amendment of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were published as required under the Local Planning Act and the public having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence, the City having adopted FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 2 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING ~ ~ Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on the original Annexation request, which are incorporated herein as if set forth in full, and that copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations; notice of public hearing on the request to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law having been published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for May 5, 1998, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the request to again amend the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law was duly considered at the May 5, 1998, hearing and the public having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence on the request to amend the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the City Council presents the following new Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. 2. That the property included in the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this reference is incorporated herein; the property is approximately 23.26 acres in size; it is in the Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 of Section 19, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Ada County, Idaho. 3. That the property is presently zoned by the County RT (Rural Transition); that the Applicant has requested that the property be zoned R-4 Residential. 4. The general area surrounding the property is used agriculturally and residentially; that much of the residential property in the area is zoned R-4 Residential with some of it developed at less density than allowed in the R-4 zone; that Salmon FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 3 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING Rapids No. 1 and No. 2, which was previously annexed, is an R-4 development, a housing size of 1,400 square feet. 5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits. 6. The Applicant, Marty Goldsmith, is the owner of record of the property. 7. That the property included in the annexation and zoning application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 8. That the parcel of ground is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. That the Application requests that the parcel be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential; that the applicant indicated that the intended development of the property is for single family dwellings with a density of 3.4 dwelling units per acre; Applicant stated at the hearing that for this phase No. 3 that the square footage was 1,400 and 1,500 square feet where the houses bounded Meridian Greens within 500 feet. 10. That in the Rural Area section of the Comprehensive Plan, Section 6.3, it does state that land in agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity until urban services can be provided. 11. That the property can be physically serviced with City sewer; that there is a question in the mind of the City Engineer, regarding water service and water service is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by the City's computer FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 4 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING ~ ~ model. 12. That the Eight Mile Irrigation Lateral traverses the site in a southeast to northwest direction and is located within an 80-foot wide easement. 13. That there was no public testimony given at the hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission. 14. That Gene Schultz testified before the City Council regarding the type of fencing the developer had planned on using for the boundary on the south side, between Kachina Estates and the proposed subdivision. 15. That John Shipley testified at the City Council Public Hearing on October 17, 1995, bringing up the question as to the location of the well house; that according to the map he had, from May, it didn't show it; that it is suppose to be somewhere on the 23 acres and by the looks of it ends up somewhere in the middle of a cul-de-sac. 16. Marty Goldsmith testified at the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing that the fencing would be of a non-combustible type which is chain link with pickets in them that don't burn; that some construction is being done to address the needs of some residents; that some weeding can be done to knock down some overgrowth; that the location of the well house is on Lot 14, Block 5, and that the street does go around it; that the lots in phase #3 of Salmon Rapids are not buildable until the extension of the sewer is made ~to them (This language was suggested to be deleted by McColl, but it is what Goldsmith stated and cannot be changed in FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 5 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING the Findings.); that he is working as to where which lots go where and that the southwest corner will go to the Ten Mile Sewer and that the other lots will go in the sewer main that is a little bit closer; that he is trying to move ahead with the lot layout and his intentions for serving those; that water is not a problem and neither is the sewer. Mr. Goldsmith testified at the City Council public hearing on October 17, 1995, that the well issues in Los Alamitos are applicable to Salmon Rapids Subdivision also; that he can knock down some weeds; that in response to Gary Smith' s and the Mayor' s concern regarding sewer, he stated that there are some lots in the southwest corner of the subdivision that are not buildable on until sewer is extended to them; that sewer would be to the Ten Mile Sewer line. 17. That Gary Smith, Meridian City Engineer, testified at the City Council public hearing on October 17, 1995, that the sewer does not have enough depth in Locust Grove or through thi s subdivision in order to sewer those lots; that the land falls away to the southwest where Ten Mile Drain; that these lots will have to be sewered by an extension of the sewer main in Ten Mile Creek or adjacent to Ten Mile Creek that comes through Meridian Greens Subdivision; that until sewer line is extended through Meridian Greens, through Kachina Estates along Ten Mile Creek, that the lots are not buildable; that the development plans will not be approved until the sewer is extended. 18. Walt Morrow testified at the City Council public hearing FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 6 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING on October 17, 1995, that the 20 foot landscape strip along Locust Grove Road, which the developer was instructed to move to an appropriate place had not been done; that the developer had earlier assured the City that this would be completed by August 15, 1995; that the existing fence is falling down and property buyers within the subdivision claimed the developer has sold them the 11 feet, plus or minus, to add to their lot. 19. Meridian Police Department, Meridian Fire Department, the Meridian City Engineer, Ada County Street Name Committee, the Central District Health Department, Nampa Meridian Irrigation District, Meridian School District, U. S. West and the Meridian Planning Director, submitted comments and such are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 20. That the Meridian City Engineer's assistant, Bruce Freckleton specifically commented for the City Council public hearing on October 17, 1995, as follows: a. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in .this project, shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605.M.; plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department; that no variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project; b. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems shall be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517; that wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation; c. Determine the seasonal high groundwater elevation, and submit a profile of the subsurface soil conditions as prepared by a soil scientist with street development plans; d. That water service to this development is contingent FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 7 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING ~ ~ upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by computer model; e. That a determination of ground water level and subsurface soil conditions should be made. f. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer mains to and through this proposed development via the existing mains installed in prior phases of this development; manholes shall be provided to keep the lines on the south and west side of the centerline; g. Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development via existing mains installed in prior phases of this development; that the well proposed to be located in the No. 1 phase of this subdivision needs to be in operation ahead of this No. 2 phase development. 21. That Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator specifically commented for the City Council public hearing on October 17, 1995, stating as follows: a. That any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property, included in this project, shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605; that a variance for tiling of the Eight Mile Lateral was granted in phase 1 provided the ditch is fenced with a chain link or wrought iron fence on both sides of the right-of-way; b. That any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed from their domestic service except that the wells be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation, per City Ordinance; c. Adjacent residential property must be screened with fencing as presented. by developer during Phase 1 public hearings; perimeter fencing and fencing of the Eight Mile Lateral is to be in place prior to obtaining building permits for housing; d. Submit protective covenants fo•r subdivision in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-9-605; e. That the Applicant is to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416.L. and 11-2-417.D.; that the Development Agreement shall address, but not be limited to, the inclusion into the subdivision of the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 8 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING requirements of 11-9-605 C., G., H.2., K. and L, and the goals expressed in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan; f. That the Applicant indicates a minimum house size of 1,400 square feet; that Phase 1 development agreement and restrictive covenants require a minimum house size of 1,500 square feet; g. That the Comprehensive Plan indicates that a school and park site is needed in this section. Shari Stiles further commented that a new plat was received August 15, 1995; that she could see no significant major changes; that with regard to the fence, the City has been making these planting strip requirements and the idea is that there would be the road right of way, 20 feet beyond that right of way which would be maintained as a planting strip and then the fencing; that when the fence was installed in this subdivision it was put up to match Sportsman Pointe's which was only 10 feet from the right of way; that Mr. Goldsmith told her that he is in the process of moving the fence to where it should be; that her main concern with having that fence within the 20 foot planting strip was that they would have part of what would be homeowners owned property, then they would also have a 20 foot utility easement, so in essence they would have about 21 feet in the back of their property if the fence remained where it was, which was all easement; that nothing could be built there and they would have to stay back that far from the fence line; that the developer has said he is in the process of moving that fence to the edge of the 20 foot landscape lot. 22. The Meridian School District submitted comments in prior annexations in this area, that there is no excess capacity in the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 9 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING • schools of the District and that residents of the new subdivision could not be assured of attending the neighborhood schools; the School District asked for support for a development fee or a transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional schools. 23. That the R-4, Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 3. as follows: (R-4) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT: The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low density single-family dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominantly residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan or the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non-residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four (4) dwellings units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian.; that the R-4 zoning district requires a minimum of 1,400 square feet to be included in houses in that zone; that in annexation the City may, as a condition of annexation, require a higher minimum house size than 1,400 square feet. 24. That the Applicant submitted an application for preliminary plat along with the application for annexation and zoning which application included a preliminary plat. 25. That the land is adjacent to the land annexed and being developed as Salmon Rapids No. 1 & 2, which is now in the process of development. 26. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Residential Policies, 2.1U states as follows: "Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi-family, townhouses, apartments, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 10 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING ~ ~ condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities." 27. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.3 c., it states as follows: "Within the Urban Service Planning Area development may occur in densities as low as 3 dwellings per acre if physical connection is made to existing City of Meridian water and sewer service and the property is platted and subdivided .' 28. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.4, it states as follows: "Residential development is allowed in the rural area provided that said development does not exceed the Rural Residential Agricultural density, unless it is inside the Urban Service Planning Area and City sewer and water is provided, then Low, Medium and High density residential may be considered. All residential development must also comply with the other appropriate sections of this plan." 29. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Population, Housing Policies, at page 66, it states as follows: "l.l The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes, multi-family, townhouses, apartments, condominiums." "1.3 An open housing market for all persons, regardless of race, sex, age, religion or ethnic background." "1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers should be encouraged." 30. That there is a population influx into the City of Meridian at the present time which has been going on for some time and is continuing; that the land is relatively close to Meridian and economic conditions are making it difficult to continue farming in the area. 31. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 11 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING • ~ amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code, relating to subdivision ordinances, states as follows: "Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects of subdivision development on the ability of political subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to deliver services without compromising quality of service delivery to current residents or imposing substantial additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the subdivision."; that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in population that is occurring and with its impact on the City being able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School District which provide school service to current and future residents of the City; that the City knows that the increase in population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to provide for school services to current and future students. 32. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which if possible would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in the City, because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 12 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING 33. That Section 11-9-605 C states as follows: "Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas; the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide." 34. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows: "Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to screen the view from residential properties. Such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right of way or utility easement." 35. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows: "Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of the subdivision;" 36. That Section 11-9-605 K states as follows: "The extent and location of lands designed for linear open space corridors should be determined by natural features and, to lesser extent, by man-made features such as utility easements, transportation rights of way or water rights of way. Landscaping, screening or lineal open space corridors may be required for the protection of residential properties from adjacent arterial streets, waterways, railroad rights of way or other features. As improved areas (landscaped), semi- improved areas (a landscaped pathway only), or unimproved areas (left in a natural state), linear open space corridors serve: 1. To preserve openness; 2. To interconnect park and open space systems within rights of way for trails, walkways, bicycle ways; 3. To play a major role in conserving area scenic and natural value, especially waterways, drainages and natural habitat; 4. To buffer more intensive adjacent urban land uses; 5. To enhance local identification within the area due to the internal linkages; and FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 13 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING 6. To link residential neighborhoods, park areas and recreation facilities." 37. That Section 11-9-605 L states as follows: Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new developments as part of the public right of way or as separate easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is distinct and separate from the automobile) can be provided throughout the City Urban Service Planning Area. The Commission and Council shall consider the Bicycle-Pedestrian Design Manual for Ada County (as prepared by Ada County Highway District) when reviewing bicycle and pedestrian pathway provisions within developments. 38. That at the City Council Public Hearing held on May 5, 1998, for the Applicant's request to amend the previous Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Brian McColl, Councilman Rountree, Councilman Bentley, Councilman Anderson, and City Engineer Smith, and the following members of the public, John Shipley and Chad Inmen, testified as follows: a. Brian McColl: This is a request by my client, Farwest Developers to modify and/or clarify a particular portion of the Findings of Fact that were passed by the City in February of 1996 with respect to the phase of Salmon Rapids Subdivision that was then known as Salmon Rapids No. 3. The pressurized irrigation system that serves Salmon Rapids and Los Alamitos subdivisions has two sources of water. There is a well in Salmon Rapids. Surface water comes out of Hunters Lateral and goes to a pumping station. They instructed the City Engineer to inquire with Water Resources as to whether or not the City had any liability and the upshot of it was to ultimately pass those Finding of Fact that we referred to in February of 1996 and a portion of those Findings required that the developer monitor this well and neighboring wells. The portion that we seek tonight to modify is the portion that is found on page fifteen and I'll just read it and then I'll tell you what we'd like it modified to. The City Engineer requested a hydrologist to give the City some sort of guidance on how to implement this well monitoring and you have before you Mr. Edward Squire's report. The City Engineer, Gary Smith had retained him and asked him to issue his report. In his report he recommended a slightly different monitoring schedule and I quote from FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 14 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING that, "We recommend monthly monitoring of water level, total production and discharge rate if pumping for the Goldsmith, Babbitt and Shipley wells over the course of the year so that the seasonal groundwater fluctuation can be quantified and separated from possible interference affects and to establish baseline water levels for the monitoring wells. Once the data has been accumulated for a year monitoring frequency of the observation wells could be relaxed to one or two measurements per year. The Goldsmith well should be measured monthly through the winter non-pumping season for the first year (1996). Of particular importance are the pre-irrigation season measurements taken in early March and the end of season. Pumping water level measured in early November for subsequent years only. The early March and early November measurements should be necessary with no winter measurements." I think it's the policy of this Council to have developers turn over to the appropriate irrigation district the pressurized irrigation system. We have been trying to turn over this system to Nampa-Meridian for the better part of a year. They have a few items on their punch list but they refused to take this well because they don't like the open ended well monitoring verbiage. I had come before the Council and suggested that we lift these in their entirety. The Council was somewhat sympathetic because we need to get these things moved around so that we can get the water system over to Nampa-Meridian. Nampa-Meridian has indicated that if the well monitoring language in the Findings of Fact is modified or amended to have them replaced with Mr. Squire's recommendation with the further caveat that they have a five year sunset clause, they would then be comfortable taking over this well. The pumping station that utilizes surface water was designed with enough capacity to do all of Los Alamitos, all of Salmon Rapids, all of Raven Hill, so there is more than enough capacity. We have sufficient water rights. The developer wants to get it over to Nampa-Meridian. This subdivision has as a secondary source so that when the water goes out of the ditches the homeowners have available to them city water but they wouldn't have to use city water if we could keep this well in production. It was at the City Engineer's instance that we moved ahead with this request by way of public hearing to modify the Findings of Fact in the February 6, 1996 hearing to be amended to incorporate in their place the recommendations of Mr. Squires as I've read into the record. b. Councilman Bentley stated: But is the entire pressurized system is in and functional? c. Gary Smith: I think there are issues that Nampa- Meridian needs to have addressed before they will sign off FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 15 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING • • on the system and totally accept it. I think that the pump station that serves all three subdivisions is functional and is in operation. d. Councilman Rountree stated, "So you're close to 2 CFS with that expanded water right. So you have a water right that's substantiated by Water Resources to use that water anyway." e. Brian McColl stated, "That's correct." f. John Shipley: If they don't want to monitor that any more if they'd just put some kind of a bond forth if I've got to spend money on my well to - that you know, if it starts going dry that somebody else pays for re-putting the pump in there. If they don't want to monitor anymore maybe they can pay for putting a new well in on me that's deeper. I irrigate with surface water. g. Chad Inmen: Inmen I do feel for Mr. Shipley. h. Councilman Anderson: Nampa-Meridian has said that they would prefer that the monitoring requirement be as found by the hydrologist and the hydrologist talks about looking at it at the beginning of the season and at the end of the season. I think at this point we probably should defer to their expertise. i. Gary Smith: Since Nampa-Meridian is involved in taking the system for the three subdivisions, operating and maintaining it and this well is an intrical part of that system then that was my interest too was to see that that well went along with the rest of the system for Nampa- Meridian's operation and ownership. 39. That the report of Edward Squires is attached hereto. 40. That proper notice was given as required by law and all procedures before the City Council were given and followed. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 16 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING • • CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met, including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that exercise of the City's annexation authority is a Legislative function. 3. That the City Council has judged this annexation and zoning application under Section 50-222, Idaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice. 4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been complied with. 5. That the City Council may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 6. That the land within the annexation is contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian, and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation. 7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the Applicant with the consent of the titled owners and the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 17 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING • annexation is not upon the initiation of the City of Meridian. 8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land. Burt vs. The City of Idaho Falls, 105 Idaho 65, 665 P.D 1075 (1983). 9. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9-605 M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways. 10. That the Applicant's property is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, and therefore the annexation and zoning Application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. 11. That the requirements of the Meridian City Engineer's office, including those specifically stated in its comments and those stated herein in these Findings and Conclusions, and of the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, Meridian Fire Department, U. S. West, and the comments of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Director shall be met and addressed in a development Agreement which has now been done. 12. That all ditches, canals, and waterways, including the Eight Mile Lateral, shall be tiled as a condition of annexation; that a variance was granted for tiling of the Eight Mile Lateral in Phase 1 provided the ditch is fenced with chain link or wrought iron fence on both sides of the right-of-way and if not done the property shall be subject to de-annexation. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 18 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING 13. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land; that the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance except as otherwise required herein; that, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G 1, H 2, K, L, M and the comments of the Planning and Zoning Director, Shari Stiles. That the development agreement shall, as a condition of annexation, require that the Applicant, or if required, any assigns, heirs, executors or personal representatives, pay, when required, any impact, development, or transfer fee, adopted by the City; that there shall be no annexation until the requirements of this paragraph are met or, if necessary, the property shall be subject to de-annexation and loss of City services, if the requirements of this paragraph are not met. 14. That the original Conclusions of Law stated as follows: "That since Marty Goldsmith stated that Salmon Rapids has the same well issues as Los Alamitos Subdivision, if the land has surface water rights, those rights should be used for pressurized irrigation, and that since Applicant is now using well water from one well for pressurized irrigation in prior phases of this subdivision, and for Los Alamitos Subdivision, it shall monitor its well, its use and water level, to ascertain the impact of its use of well water for pressurized irrigation on wells located on adjacent property; that Applicant shall obtain approval from the City for all monitoring equipment, method and means to perform the well monitoring; that the monitoring shall be performed bi-weekly during the months of April, May, June, July, August, September and October; that Applicant shall approach two adjacent land FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 19 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING • owners, if possible, to obtain permission to monitor their wells on the same bi-weekly schedule; that the only proof that two adjacent land owners are not willing to have their wells monitored shall be signed and notarized affidavits from all lot owners adjacent to the subdivision that they will not allow such monitoring; that two such adjacent wells shall be monitored, but if two adjacent lot owners are not willing to have their wells monitored Applicant shall request the City to determine how the wells in the area shall then be monitored; that this monitoring of the wells shall go on until wells-are no longer used for pressurized irrigation and shall also be addressed in the Development Agreement; that the Applicant shall also annually provide the well monitoring information to the State of Idaho, Department of Water Resources, and have it determine, if possible, the impacts on the ground water of Applicant's use of well water for pressurized irrigation; Applicant shall have the Department of Water Resources furnish the City a copy of their annual report; Applicant shall pay all cost of the well monitoring and of the Department of Water Resources." 15. That due to the Application, the Public Hearing, and the testimony submitted, on Applicant's request to Amend the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is now also Concluded as follows: That the well monitoring, initially required monthly, shall be reduced to two times per year, once in early March and once in early November, as suggested by Edward Squires in his report dated September 11, 1996., which is incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 16. That the house size requirements for the R-4 district of 1,400 square feet shall be followed and complied with, except if the home is within 500 square feet of Meridians Greens Subdivision then the minimum size house shall be 1,500 square feet; that homes within 500 feet of Meridian Greens Subdivision shall have wood shingle roofs; -the Applicant shall extend the guard rail along Locust Grove Road the number of feet recommended by the Ada County Highway District (ACHD); that it was the understanding of the City FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 20 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING Council that ACRD would provide the materials for the guard rail and inspect it; that Applicant shall provide the rail and Applicant shall post a completion bond for 1108 of the value of the work, as determined by ACHD, to complete the guard rail. 17. That proper and adequate access to the property is available and will have to be maintained; that access to and from the adjacent property owners will have to be worked out and included in the development agreement, or the property will not be annexed or, if annexed, it will be de-annexed. 18. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the applicant, the titled owner, and his assigns. 19. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the annexation and zoning of R-4 Residential, with 1,400 square foot minimum sized houses, would be in the best interest of the City of Meridian. 20. That if these conditions of approval are not met the property shall be subject to de-annexation. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 21 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian City Council hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. 1")/1T T /'PTT T COUNCILMAN BIRD VOTED COUNCILMAN BENTLEY VOTED COUNCILMAN ROUNTREE VOTED C~_ COUNCILMAN ANDERSON VOTED_~~ MAYOR CORRIE (TIE BREAI~R) VOTED DECISION The City Council of the City of Meridian hereby decides on approval of the annexation and zoning as already done for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and those stated herein, including that the minimum house size shall be 1,400 square feet, except if the homes would be within 500 feet of homes in Meridian Greens Subdivision then the minimum size house shall be 1,500 square feet, that surface water shall be used for pressurized irrigation, if possible, that Applicant shall extend the guard rail along Locust Grove Road the number of feet recommended by the Ada County Highway District (ACHD); that it was the understanding of the City Council that ACRD would provide the materials for the guard rail and inspect it; that Applicant shall provide the rail and Applicant shall post a completion bond for 110 of the value of FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 22 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING • the work to complete the guard rail; that Applicant shall meet the provisions of the Conclusions of Law regarding monitoring of wells two times .per year, once in early March and once in early November, specifically comply with Section 11-9-605 G 1. regarding planting strips being a minimum of twenty feet {20') wide and not be a part of the street right of way or utility easement, the all ditches, canals and waterways, as required and if not yet completed, all as a condition of annexation and that the Applicant meet all of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, specifically including the development time requirements and entering into the required development agreement, which has been done at the time of adoption of these Second Amended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and that if the conditions are not met that the property be de- annexed. MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 23 FARWEST DEVELOPERS - ANNEXATION AND ZONING i lrrdward Squires Hy'drogeologist 1530 Knights Drive, $oise, ID 837tZ (208j 342-8369 Mr. Gary D. Smith, P.E. City of Meridian 33 East Idalto Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Gary: 1 I September, 1996 ~'ECE/1/~rC r. :, ~ p ~ 3 ~Jv 1 ~~t=Rlp;, ~ 1: y EMGII~Irr-; I have looked into the circumstances surrounding the Goldsmith well to be used for pressurized irrigation of-the Salmon Rapids and Los AIamitos Subdivisions. We have coordinated with Mike Teschner, of Mtrl. Landscaping, to investigate the well and to recommend a monitoring plan for the well as required by the Nleridiar. City Council. It is our understanding that Mtn. Landscaping is representing the developer, Marty . Goldsmith, of Far West Development. Summary Details of well construction and production history are incomplete for the "Goldsmith" well. Available data suggest that the well is relatively shallow and may be in hydraulic conncccion with surface water sources. The well is not difficult to measure under pumping ornon-pumping conditions and is equipped adequately for measuring water-Level, flow rate, and total production. The nearby Babbitt and Shipley wells have been selected as observation wells to measure possible interfcrcnce effects from . Goldsmith well pumping. The two wells are of similar depth, are in close proximity to the Goldsmith well, and are owned by the two most interested parties to the dispute. A monthly monitoring program has been recommended for the fast year to obtain baseline data. The frequency of measurements should be re-evaluated aRer year one and probably reduced. It is unlikely that the Goldsmith wcIl will cause adverse effects to total area water levels, however, total gallons pumped must be reported to evaluate conditioned restrictions of the water right. Mtn. Landscaping has the necessary experience and equipment to obtain .the necessary measurements to be reported to City of Meridian. History There is not a DriIler's Record on file with the Idaho Depzrtment of Water Resources which matches the location or size of the 8-inch diameter irrigation well, hereinafter referred to as the "Goldsmith" well. The well has reportedly been in existence for many years and lead been previously used to irrigate the croplands surrounding the well. Water Right 63- 02968 is associated with the well and has a priority date of 1953 for irrigation of 23 acres.. The original Right, under the name of Thomas P. Gray, is volumetrically limited to 103.5 acre feet per annum and has a rate of flow restriction of ,4G cubic feet per second (ZOG.44 gpm). Period of Use is from March 15-to-Nov. 15. Post-It' F ;x NOt9 7871 Oa" e~-a b-pp Cap°e~> _°BR~va;~/ Me.GoLl_ Fran (,-WUK.-q BuRRI -041.. • This Water Right is a "supplemental" right which is to say that it may be used as a "back- up" in years when surface water rights may not be avail261c or are reduced. T}1e supplemental nature of the original right is associated with the ~vay in which tlic water was historically used. A Transfer of Water Right, approved June 22, I995, is formally conditioned that the new owner, .Far West Development, shall use their full allotment of surface water rights prior to use of groundwater rights, A neighbor, Gene babbitt, recalled that, "the Goldsmith well was drilled in 1964 for the landowner, Jerry McDermott, who farmed 50 acres using a combination of canal water and groundwater from the well". Babbitt thought the well was originally drilled to 130 feet by Randall Drilling of ,'Vlcridian. Although Darrell Randall did drill many of the local arcs wells, there is not a record of an 8-inch McDermott well in the IDWR ftles. It is not entirely clear whether this is the original well drilled in the 1950'5, if this is a replacement well drilled by McDermott, or if the wcI! was drilled more recently than the water-right, as a supplemental well in times of limited surface water supply. It is likely that some of these questions might be answered through an in-depth review of the Water Rights file at IDWR. This is beyond the scope of your request and we have not requested the file Site survey The Iocativn of the Goldsmith well is shown on Figure 1 to be in the SE, NE, SE 1/4 of Section 19, T3N, R1E just.sauth of the Eightmile Lateral where it crosses Locust Grove Road. An 8-inch steel casing extends 1.Z feet above the pumphouse floor (Figure Z) winch is essentially ground IeveI. The existing pump is a 300 gpm Crown bH-300 submersible pump with 4-stages on a ZO HP Franklin motor installed by Burgess Pump Cv. The pump is equipped with an Associated Coil variable frequency drive, a measuring pert, an airline, and a 4-inch McCrorneter (MW-500) fIowmeter. 'T'his is an inline propeller flowmeter prefabricated inside of a flanged length of pipe with flow vanes. According to John Burgess, the total depth of the well was 71 feet below top of casing at the time of pump installation.. On Jufy 1, 1996, Jeff AIlrcd attempted to plumb the total depth of the well, with the pump installed, and could not lower a weighted stecI tape below 76.5 feet. He palled out and measured 57 feet of sirlinc which was reinstalled in the well and the air gage calibrated to sounded water levels. The pumping and static water-levels are not difficult to measure with either steel or electric well sounders. On this date, Jefl'measured pumping water-IeveI at 15:19 hoars at 35.40 feet below top of casing with the well pumping at IZO gpm. Totalizer read 7,330,000 gallons at the time of this measurement. Tlic pump is set tv operate between 40-and-GS Ib. of pressure. Front a previous reading of 5,574,800 gallons on June I0, 199G at 14:00 hr., an average pumping rate of 57 gpm is calculated for a Z 1 day period (exactly 2I days, 1 hour and I7 minutes; 30,3I7 min.) of time. . A static water-IeveI for the Goldsmith welt was not obtained because the well was in use during both of our site ~. isits. Nttn. Landscaping measurements are typically taken ~~ ~~. only a few minutes .after coming off the pump and, so, aze not rcpresentati vc of complete recovery. Discussions with Mike Teschner indicate that the well does not draw dawn appreciably (<$ feet) at typical pumping rates. Pumping water•1cveI measurements taken ''While the discharge rate fluctuated between ZO and I00 gpm show that Iess.than 3 feet of water-level fluctuation occurs. Although the pump is capable of producing 300 gpm, the well dots not apparently pump at higher rafts for long, as evidenced by the 57 gpm average discharge talc. The maximum discharge rate observed has been 120 gpm and this was for less than 2 minutes. Mtn. Landscaping appears to be doing an adequate job of monitoring and our measurements are consistent will: theirs. We understand that Mtn. Landscaping will report on their monitoring to the Meridian City Engineer's Office. Mtn. Landscaping's measurements to date are included as Attachment A. Like]ihood of well interference and recommended frequency of monitoring. The Babbitt and Shipley wells (Figure I} are a good choice for monitoring the influence on local groundwater levels. In addition to being near the Goldsmith well and completed to similaz depths, these wells belong to the parties concerned about possible impact from the Goldsmith well pumping. We recommend monthly monitoring of water veI total roduction and dischar a rate if um in for a ~~'Babbitt, and ~hiptey wells over the course of a yeaz so that the seasonal groundwater fluctuate no' can ~ quantified and sepazaTe~ p bTe'inte eience~effec'ts` a`nd to establisli~basTm`c water-levels for the morutonng wells. dace a ata ~~ hn~n srrnrri„late.i f ~ ....___ measurements per year. The Goldsmith well should be measured monthly through the winter (non-pumptrtg) season for the first year (I 996}. Of particular importance are the pre-irrigation season measurement, taken in eazly March, and the end of season pumping water level, measured in early November. For subsequent years, only the early March and early NQVember measurements should be necess ~~ ~~~~ ` ,t,,M~c cam, ary with no winter measurem nts. ~ r, f~ We think rt unlikely that pumping from the Goldsmith welt will adversely impact caster-levels in adjacent wells. The shallow depth of the wells and the lack of significant !ow permeability sediments underlying 40-to-70 feet of Whitney t~nace gravels (from driIIcr's reports, Attachment B} strongly suggest that wells Less that 150 feet in depth aze in hydraulic connection with surface water sources. Owing to the preponderance of surface water courses (Eightmile Lateral, Ridenbaugh Canal, Tenntile Creek, and Fivemile Creek -see Figure I.} in the immediate vicinity, it is expected that recharge from surface sources imparts a stability to arcs water levels. This seems to be borne out by water-level measurements to date. Please call with any questions. Sincerely, ~6~ Fd Squires • WILSON BL MCCOLL LAWYERS JEFFREY M. WILSON 420 WEST WASHINGTON TELEPHONE: (208) 348-9100 BRIAN F. McCOLL POST OFFICE BOX 1844 FACSIMILE: (208) 384-0442 BOISE, IDAHO 83701 E-MAIL• wlNlAaekMi RECE'D'ED May 19, 1998 MAY 1 9 1998 CITY OF MERIDIAN Mr. Robert Corrie Mayor of the City of Meridian Mr. Gary Smith Meridian City Council 33rd E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Salmon Rapids Well Monitoring Gentlemen: I had a chance to review the amendment to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law this afternoon. The amendment is contained in paragraph 15 on page 20. The amendment makes no reference to the monitoring requirements having a five-year sunset clause. Nampa Meridian Irrigation District was adamant that there be a time restriction on the monitoring as a condition to Nampa Meridian accepting the system. I testified to this request at the hearing so that it was appropriately part of the public record. My client, Farwest Developers, would respectfully request that the proposed amended findings include the five-year sunset clause. I believe that the rest of the testimony supported the fact that these monitoring restrictions are unnecessary. The Idaho Department of Water Resources has a mechanism for resolving competing water right disputes and the water rights associated with the well have their own restrictions on it as to volume, capacity and time of use. I know that this matter is extremely important to the City Engineer and would hope that the Council would include the five-year sunset clause in the amendment. Yours ~~// BFM/rj • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MAY 19 1998 APPLICANT: FARWEST DEVELOPERS ITEM NUMBER: 3 REQUEST• LIFT REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED REGARDING EXISTING WELL LOCATED IN SALMON RAPIDS N0.4 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT; MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INtERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: SEE ATTACHED MINUTES FROM 5/5/98 SEE ATTACHED FINDINGS ~G~L ,,~ ~(~ 1,~;v ~~ Gti''~ ~ c ~~~ ~~~- 5 OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Meridian City Counci~ • May 5, 1998 Page 35 ITEM # 11: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO-LIFT REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED REGARDING EXISTING WELL LOCATED IN SALMON RAPIDS NO. 4 BY FARWEST DEVELOPERS -SOUTH LOCUST GROVE BETWEEN OVERLAND AND VICTORY: Cowie: At this time I'll open the public hearing on item #11 and invite the attorney to start. Crookston: Would you state your name and address please. McCall: My name is Brian McCall, my address is 420 W. Washington, Boise. Crookston: Do you promise, swear or affirm that the testimony you give tonight will be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you? McCall: I do. Crookston: Please proceed. McCall: Thank you. Mayor and Council, the agenda item is a bit of a misnomer, this is a request by my client, Farwest Developers to modify and/or clarify a particular portion of the Findings of Fact that were passed by the City in February of 1996 with respect to the phase of Salmon Rapids Subdivision that was then known as Salmon Rapids No. 3, those who are Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law with respect to the annexation and the rezoning of what was then the balance of the Salmon Rapids project. Just briefly, Salmon Rapids together with Los Alamitos Subdivision are subdivisions somewhere short of 300 single family tots. The pressurized imgation system that serves both of those subdivisions has two sources of water, there is a well located in the Salmon Rapids property and there is surface water comes out of Hunters Lateral it goes to a pumping station, actually there was some testimony on it tonight on the Los Alamitos property, ifs a closed system; there's both of those sources of water then serve as -those all stages of both of those subdivisions and Raven Hi11 Subdivision. When Salmon Rapids was originally developed and Los Alamitos, the well was approved to be sufficient enough water for Salmon Rapids No. 1, Los Alamitos No. 1, and a very small stage of Los Alamitos No. 2. When the developer came to request annexation and zoning for Salmon Rapids No. 3 the public hearing was in August 15, 1995, at that public hearing there was testimony from an individual neighboring property owner that he had concern about the impact on his well and some other neighbor wells, hypothetically, of the use of the well on Salmon Rapids. That created a great deal of inquiry by the City Counal at that point and time, they instructed the City Engineer to inquire with Water Resources at to whether or not the City had any liarility in this area and the upshot of it was to ultimately pass those Finding of Fact that we referred to in February of 1996 and a portion of those .Findings required that the developer monitor this well and Meridian City Counci~ • May 5, 1998 Page 36 neighboring wells. The particular language that went in there, it's not dear that there was any public testimony on it and it's not really clear where the source of it came from but nonetheless the portion that we seek tonight to modify is the portion that is found on page fifteen and I'll just read it and then I'll tell you what we'd like it modified to. 'That the monitoring shall be performed bi-weekly during the months of April, May, June, July, August, September and. October and that the applicant shall approach two adjacent landowners if possible to obtain permission to monitor their wells on the same bi-weekly schedule" and then down a little bit further "that this monitoring of the well shall go on until the well's are no longer used for pressurized irrigation and shall also be addressed in the development agreement that the applicant shall annually provide the well monitoring information to the State of Idaho Department of Water Resources and have it determine if possible the impacts on the ground water of applicant's use of well water for pressurized irriga#ion." Now what happened next was the City Engineer requested or retained a hydrologist to give the City some sort of guidance on how to implement this well monitoring and you have before you Mr. Edward Squire's, the hydrologist's report. The City Engineer, Gary Smith had retained him and asked him to issue his report. In his report, and you have it on page three, he recommended a slightly different monitoring schedule and I quote from that, "We recommend monthly monitoring of water level, total production and discharge rate if pumping for the Goldsmith, Babbitt and Shipley wells over the course of the year so that the seasonal groundwater fluctuation can be quantified and separated from possible intietference affects and to establish baseline water levels for the monitoring wells. Once the data has been accumulated for a year monitoring frequency of the observation wells could be relaxed to one or two measurements per year. The Goldsmith well should be measured monthly through the winter non-pumping season for the first year (1996) a particular importance are the pre-irrigation season measurement taken in early March and the end of season pumping water level measured in early November for subsequent years only the early March and early November measurements should be necessary with no winter measurements." Now the difficulty is and I was before the Council back in January, I think it's the policy of this Council to have developers tum over to the appropriate irrigation district, in this case Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District, the pressurized irrigation system. We have been trying to tum over this system to Nampa-Meridian for the better part of a year. I'm not going to represent to the Council that this is the only problem. but everything seems to be pretty much go now, they have a few items on their punch list but they refused to-take this well because they don't like the open ended well monitoring verbiage if you will in the existing Findings of Fact. I came before the Council before and sort of suggested that based upon this hydrologist's report who says that there should not be any interference from this well on other wells number one and based upon the Department of Water Resources' response to the City Engineer saying that they didn't feel it was appropriate for, that it was the proper jurisdiction for a city to get into water competing disputes. I had come before the Council and suggested that we lift Meridian City Counc~ May 5, 1998 Page 37 these in their entirety. The Counat I believe was somewhat sympathetic because you know we need to get these things moved around so that we can get the water system over to Nampa-Meridian but indicated to me that because these Findings were the result of public testimony at a public hearing we should come back at a public hearing, in the meantime and so thats why we're here tonight, but in the meantime I have met with Nampa-Meridian and Nampa- Meridian has indicated that if the well monitoring language in the Findings of Fact are modified or amended to have them replaced with Mr. Squire's recommendation with the further caveat that they have a five year sunset dause, they would then be comfortable taking over this well. Now, do we care whether the well is taken over? The pumping station that utilizes surface water that's over in Los Alamitos was designed with enough capacity to do all of Los Alamitos, all of Salmon Rapids, alt of Raven Hill, so there is more than enough capacity there and that we have sufficient water rights so the developer in one sense really doesn't care and the developer wants to get it over to Nampa- Meridian and they can just cap off the Salmon Rapids well but the City Engineer has indicated that that would be a substantial waste of a water source. This .particular subdivision like a lot of them has as a secondary source dty water so that when the water goes out of the ditches for surface water that homeowners have available to them city water but they wouldn't have to use aty water if we could keep this well in production because it is a secondary source and it would be a source that there would be water there and historically always has been water there as best I know, nobody has reported otherwise, both before the season and after the season so it was at the City Engineer's instance that we moved ahead with this request by way of public hearing to modify the Findings of Fact in the February 6, 1996 hearing to be amended to incorporate in their place the recommendations of Mr. Squires as 1've read into the record. Thank you. Corrie: Any questions Coundl at the present time? Bentley: You say that this serves all of Salmon Rapids and Los Alamitos? McCall: Well right now there's the well and then there's the pumping station, if you cap the well the surface water that's already in Los Alamitos and the pumping station that Farwest Developers put in has the capacity to service both subdivisions and in fact, should service both subdivisions exclusively during the irrigation season because the water right associated with the well is -- from the Department of Water Resources - has a condition on it that it be utilized only in years where there's insufficient water or only as a backup so it would be actually a fairly nice fit to utilize this well primarily under -consistent with the license from Department of Water Resources, consistent with their restrictions. Bentley: But is thse entire pressurized system in and functional? Meridian City Counc~ May 5, 1998 Page 38 McCall: Yes, the entire system is in and it is looped, in other words there is a valve that goes from Salmon Rapids across Locust Grove to .Los Alamitos so you can screw that off - I mean you could isolate it if you wanted to, that's probably not answering your question. Bentley: It seems to me and Gary you might have to help me with this, we have a problem with one of these subdivisions of Mr. Goldsmith's where it's not hooked up. Smith: Mayor and Counal and Councilman Bentley, I think there are some problems existing with the Los Alamitos and the Salmon Rapids pressure irrigation system as of today, I'm not sure what they are, I don't know that they're major, I think there are issues that Nampa-Meridian needs to have addressed before they will sign off on the system and totally accept it, that's what Alan Chandler has been working on from the Raven Hills development on his subdivision in terms of the distribution system I think that the pump station as Brian has stated that serves all three subdivisions is functional, is operation, the things that need to be corrected in Los Alamitos, the last phase of Los Alamitos and the last phase of Salmon Rapids, I don't know what they are, typically I think what they amount to in most any subdivision is leakage and pipes, height of risers for homeowners to connect to, detail type stuff. McCall: This is somewhat hearsay but Mr. Goldsmith's right hand assistant Kim, I spoke with her yesterday and thats why I say there is a punch list that we're working through with Nampa-Meridian Irrigation, I asked her "A" what that was, "B" when she thought it was going to be resolved. The punch list as I understand it and I don't have any direct knowledge of this, is that in Salmon Rapids No. 4 on some of those lots that have -that are still in the development stage, the risers that indicate where the stub out if you will to the system have been buried. Nampa-Meridian won't take it until we go find them, locate them, there is a portion of the line in Salmon Rapids that is and I don't know whether we're talking main line or some sort of lateral that is uncovered and needs to be appropriately buried and she also spoke of there have been some leaks but as Gary says that's in the distribution system, Mr. Chandler put in the pumping station, it has the capacity obviously if there's a weak chain and there's a leak somewhere it probably upsets the whole- thing but I'm not sure that -that may be another issue that we may need to address but iYs not particularly on point with respect to the monitoring requirements in the well. Bentley: Thank you. Rountree: You indicated that the well would be operated per either the permit or the guidance or certification or whatever by Water Resources, is the weal identified for a certain capacity and that capacity would not be exceeded is that what I understand from that comment? Meridian city Counc~ May 5, 1998 Page 39 McCall: Yes, it is. There are actually three different water permits. The original permit dates back to sometime in the early fifties and it was a permit for then 23- acres that didn't speak to residential lots. When Mr. Goldsmith started this development he applied to Water Resources to have that water right transferred across the street so that water from the well could be sprinkled on lawns and Los Alamitos. That's the second water right and that covered only Salmon Rapids No. 1, Los Alamitos No. 1, and I believe under twenty lots in Los Alamitos No. 2, then as development progressed and we added a whole bunch more lots in Los Alamitos and Los Alamitos the rest of No. 2 and No. 3 and Salmon Rapids now No. 4, we went back to the department of Water Resources and they substantially expanded the water right in terms of their measurement and I believe the original 1953 water right was at .46 CFS, they added an additional 1.5 CFS's so we actually think that we've got enough water out of that well that during the non-irrigation system alt three of those subdivisions probably would not have to use any city water and 1 think that's the City Engineer's interest in this. Smith: Yes. Rountree: So you're close to 2 CFS with that expanded water right. McCall: That's exactly right, translated into acres it would be 75 plus 23-acres, translated into lots, although the first water right was not stated in lots we've used their formula and I know that Gary disagrees with us on this but under their formula it comes up to 306 lots and with the - I'm not going to get into the lot issue because I'm not absolutely certain on this. A lot of lots. Rountree: So you have a water right that's substantiated by Water Resources to use that water anyway. McCall: That's correct. Yeah, the only question -yeah we can use it, we've sort of like to use it and I think it makes sense to use it but Nampa-Meridian who knows all about water running in ditches and doesn't know very much about water in wells, when we sat down to discuss the fine print of turning this thing over I opened my big mouth and said that there are some restrictions attached to this as imposed. by the Meridian City Council back in February of 1996 and they said oh, what's that? and then I read them and they said oh, we've got to sign on to monitor Mr. Babbitt's well for the rest of history, we won't take it with those restrictions and I said well actually the hydrologist says that it's not necessary so I'll. go in front of the Council and see if we can get it changed. Rountree: Thank you. Corrie: Isthere-anyone else who would like #o issue testimony? Mr. Shipley? Meridian City Counc~ • May 5, 1998 Page 40 Crookston: Would you state your name and address please. Shipley: John Shipley, 2770 S. Locust Grove, Meridian, Idaho. Crookston: Do you promise, swear or affirm that the testimony you give tonight at this public hearing will be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you? Shipley: I do. Crookston: Please proceed. Shipley: Let's see where will I begin at. He told you about the original allotment for the well, Pm going to tell you about the end of the draught which was six years ago, about six years ago we had the end of the draught when we stopped the irrigation water on the 15"' of July and that 23-acres up there was being watered one early day in October and I couldn't get a shower that morning, we'd been out of water most all summer from the 15~' of July so the surface water that goes back on the ground does have an affect. Jerry McDermott owned that land over there, that well I think it was put in in 1953 or 1957 or something like that just to irrigate that hill up there because they were going to have to pump water out of the ditch uphill anyway and I went over and I said I need some water to drink I'm (inaudible) in my faucet and I've got to get the well guy out, he says I wonder if my well's doing that, I've been pumping that sucker for two or three days longer than I really needed to so he went up and turned the pump off and by that afternoon I had water back in my well and I never experienced another problem. Now that land out there is Heal funny, it's got layers in it you know and I suppose the water gets down in there eventually but a lot of our surface water just runs off into the .nine mile drain or off onto the other side of my property there's a ditch that runs down there that goes back to the Nine Mile Drain but last summer the lightening hit my well and I had to have a new pump put in and I found out I only have a 45-foot hole for my well and my pump was only sitting at about 23-feet, I put it a little deeper than that, the new pump, so that could really -you know there's probably a lot of water down in the ground there but as we keep adding more houses and more subdivisions, they're putting another 43-acres of houses in on my south side now and each footprint of each house that goes in there doesn't allow water to absorb into the ground anymore and the streets and the sewers you know, people that have lived out there for years that have a septic system and they pump wathr out of the ground they're actually it right back in the ground again so with more and more houses by the hundreds and the aty well that goes 300-feet deep or something like that and they're all pumping water into their houses and out into the sewer and it never goes back into the ground, eventually it's going to make an effect and the reason that you guys here in the City Council impose that monitoring situation was because Water Resources, Meridian City Couna~ • May 5, 1998 Page 41 and check me if I'm not right, they said something to you guys to do that, you were hand and hand in talking to them at the time the last testimony was done on that. Now I've got -there's two wells on my property, one of them's the old 1897 well-that hasn't been used for years but they can still monitor it without causing any trouble, they can go in there any time they want, I told them that, they were in and out of there last summer occasionally and dropped a thing down it and it's about 50-foot away from my well. This well that we're talking about is probably 150-yards away and sits up on the hill up there but it goes deep enough that it evidently has .had some effect on mine. If they don't want to monitor that any more if they'd just put some kind of a bond forth if I've got.to spend money on my well to -that you know, if it starts going dry that somebody else pays for re- putting the pump in there, I just put in another pump last year because the lightening got me so I'm just trying to protect rrry water right and if they're going to water a whole bunch of other houses you know and you'll go up there and you'll find it running out in the gutters and everywhere else because that's what it does when they sprinkle things. We just got to remember that what goes in the ground comes out and what comes out and it don't go back is -the hammer's going to fall somewhere along the line and that's why you people have put the monitoring on those wells but you know just to make sure that with all this addition and that isn't going to be alt of Salmon Rapids or Los Alamitos fault when they're putting more houses in that used to add water too you know so it's a concern because I can't look into the ground like Superman and tell you whaYs going on down there I just know at one time I did have a problem and so thats why I'm here at the meeting tonight so you guys figure it out, if they don't want to monitor anymore maybe they can pay for putting a new well in on me that's deeper. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I had a quesfion for Mr. Shipley.. I'm pretty sure you've told us this before but I just wanted to get my memory bads. Your well just provides domestic water, you don't irrigate with that or do you have a garden or - Shipley: No, it might water the flower patch, the roses in the front of the house and it goes out to the stock water where the cattle drink. There's two outside spigots and the rest of it goes in the house. Rountree: And then you imgate with surface water? Shipley: I irrigate with surface water, front lawn, everything irrigated with surface water, the whole place, anything, any other questions? Rountree: That's all I had. Corrie: Anyone else wish to issue testimony here tonight? Crookston: Would you state your name and address please. Meridian City Counc~ May 5, 1998 Page 42 Inmen: Chad Inmen, 2634 South Weber Rapids Place, Salmon Rapids Subdivision, Meridian. Crookston: Do you promise, -swear or affirm that the testimony you give here tonight will be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you? Inmen: Yes. Crookston: Please proceed. Inmen: I just want to let you know that I do live in that subdivision and I have paid Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District, I don't know where it is as far as who controls it, I know I paid them and.l've had questions about my water not being turned on at the beginning of the summer when there is irrigation water in the ditch and I called them and they said that they couldn't get any answers to me that it was - I was paying them but they still had control so 1 just want to make sure I get water you know, the city water, I don't want to take the city water, iYs a lot more expensive to water my lawn and wash my cars and I do feel for Mr. Shipley though and I grew up on a well and I know how that goes so if we can get water ftom Los Alamitos in that pumping station over there during the -when they're irrigating, when the irrigation water is in the irrigation ditch I feel that would be fine it just comes down to just a few dollars for all those people that want to wash their car if they want to or water their lawns in that time of the season. Anderson: Are you getting water now? Inmen: Yes. Currie: Okay, anyone else wish to issue testimony -here? Do you have any back-up, follow up that you would like to do, any questions they haven't answered? Anderson: Mr. Shipley is obviously correct that there's more and more development that there's greater pressure on a limited resource. His well has a defined water right with the Department of Water Resources, this well has a defined water right, when the city wrote to the Department of Water Resources and asked them a few questions one question was precisely that, what happens if there is an interference ftom one well to the other and the department wrote back, it's in your files, and said that there is a procedure for resolving these issues, that there is a whole history of water law based upon priority first and right, first and time, based upon other ways of perfecting your water right and the second question was from the City to the Department of Wathr Resources does the -should the City be involved in this and the response was approval of appropriation and use of a source of water for irrigation purposes is normally the Meridian City Counc• • May 5, 1998 Page 43 responsibility of the Department of Water Resources not of muniapality. I'm not aware of a role for the municipality in a well interference matter so -and -there was a draught year and we were all here and I'm sure that impacted everybody's use. This water right. has been granted to Salmon Rapids, it has restrictions on it, it has quite.frankly restrictions on it that probably better protect Mr. Shipley than do the well monitoring, the restrictions being specifically that it requires the user to utilize surface water that may be available first and then only go the well water. The issues that Mr. Shipley raises 1 think go way, way back to the fundamental issue of whether or not there should be any restrictions by this City Council on this well and I think we've sort of passed that issue before us tonight is the monitoring and Nampa-Meridian has said that they would prefer that the monitoring requirement be as found by the hydrologist and the hydrologist talks about looking at it at the beginning of the season and at the end of the season, they. talk about a different frequency and I think at this point we probably should defer to their expertise. Thank you. Corrie: Okay at this time I'll close the public hearing and have comments from Council, questions? Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I have a question for Gary Smith. Do you have anymore to add to this particular item; I think we all know quite a bit about it or at least I remember quite a bit about it. Smith: Mayor and Council, Councilman Rountree, I don't think I have anything to add, any facts to add that Brian McCall hasn't given you. As he said my interest is that we utilize the shallower ground water that this well is pumping for sprinkling purposes in lieu of the deeper ground water that we're pumping in well #17 to supply drinking, for drinking purposes and thaYs always been my concem that we -and I -think Council and the Mayor's concern too for a number of years has been to utilize the upper aquifers and our surface water for irrigation purposes and Ididn't -since Nampa-Meridian is involved in taking the system for the three subdivisions, operating and maintaining it and this well is an intrical part of that system then that was my interest too was to see that that well went along with the rest of the system for Nampa-Meridian's operation and ownership. Corrie: Gary one question, -how deep is our #17 well? Smith: Mayor, I think that it's around 700-feet, something like that. Come: Thank you. Smith: You're welcome. And by the way just as a side light, on our well cons#ruction recommendations of Ed Squire, our hydrologist consultant, we have been kind of pioneering standards for well construction through IDWR as far as seating the hole so that we don't get down hole contamination from upper Meridian City Counci~ i May 5, 1998 Page 44 aquifers that are more susceptible to surface contamination and I'm not saying that the lower aquifers are being contaminated because there are some deeper drill holes that weren't sealed very well but we're going to extra expense to see that we don't get that kind of contamination coming down hole and that we seal ourselves off from well interference or interfering with adjacent wells pumping from higher levels. So we're trying to make that extra effort on our production wells. Come: Council, which way would you like to go on this? Rountree: Mr. Mayor I more that we have counsel prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, actually the request to modify the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as it relates to monitoring of the well for Salmon Rapids No. 4. Bentley: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree second by Mr. Bentley on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be drawn up for the modification and darifying of the well monitoring. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: All aye. ITEM #12: PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENTS TO ZONING AND SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCES: Come: This was a request, is there anyone here that would -let's do it this way, I'll open the public hearing now for amendments to zoning and subdivision development ordinances. Is there anyone here who would like to issue testimony on that at this time? 1 would recommend to the Council that we continue this public hearing until Shari Stiles is back the next meeting - (end of tape) -and I know Mr. Rountree has questions as well and I'm sure you others do - Bentley: - Mr. Mayor, I move we continue the public hearing on the amendments to zoning and subdivision development ordinances until the meeting of the 19"'. Rountree: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley second by Mr. Rountree to continue the public hearing until the May 19"' meeting, any further discussion? Hearing none. All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: All aye. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MAY 5 1998 APPLICANT: FARWEST DEVELOPERS ITEM NUMBER:~1 REQUEST• PUBLIC HEARING• REQUEST TO LIFT REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED REGARDING EXISTING WELL LOCATED IN SALMON RAPIDS N0.4 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS 1,s~` ~"~~~ ~~ ~J `4C ~~~ OTHER: FARWEST DEVELOPERS -SEE ATTACHED VICINITY MAP Alt Materials presented at public meetings shalt become property of the City of Meridian. ~~ o.~ -. s ~~ - I ~ ' ~~__ ~ r _ -- --- N ~ Qo ~ ¢ __ ~-- ~- - ~_.J ~ R1 ~_ _ E_ GRIFFON ST ~ _ L I-_ ~ -'--- ~ ~ fi N- MM R~ E VVFJMERANER ST . T_ - _ j RT ~ E DOBFJiIVIMI DR N 1 7 p-r < A I l'0 $ V E TINE ZONE DR a _ RT TINE ZONE DR I B5 ` 23 C ~ 48 14 13 12 11 ~ ' 7 24 ~ ~ 10 ~~ ~ ~ 8.2 Z ~ S RT so , 2 , s ey 5y'~ `~ 2s & 5 NO V $ d SA~j ~~P~ I 1 9! ~ ~ ` Z ---~-- 5 CB 13 B.7 S~ 12 3 9~ 3o a 9~' ARY (TYPj GTY uMTS BOUND a iy i '9 11 _ 4 31 _ 7 ~ _. 9 1U S ~_ _-_ - --, --~ -- 1 } ~-ZONE BOUNOiARY (TYPj ~ -- 33 9 B 8 7' 8 ' I 1 E LAIO= CREEK ST i PROPOSED SALMON RAPIDS ~ 1 2 3 6 5 6 7 8 ~ ~ N0.4SU6DIVISION B. i ~ SJ pt 4RO~~~s P,0E8 I NpV ~,~P~S~ ~C L-- ---~ -- - 19~ ~? °-- EVICTORY RD _ ~-- --~30~ X29 RT R1 400 400 800 Feet BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. SALMON RAPIDS NO. 4 SUBDIVISION I~"~"0N BR~~S SE 1/4 SEC. 19, T3N, R1E, B.M. ~~ ~~~ MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO sir 1 OF 1 1111 S. ORCHARD. SUITE 800 ~~ ORAFT SCALE 014 04110;. N0. BasE, IDNiO es7o5 43H0515APR BIB 1" =400' 04/17/98 980515 FEB-27-98 @9:47 qM P..ING«'T lLriRFC 208.424'=s' P. 01 • • ~ ~ _^ ~, REcE~D MAY - 5 1998 Edward Squires CITY OF MERIDIAN Hydrogeologist 1530 Knights Drive, Boise, ID 83712 (208) 342-8369 Mr. Gary D. Smith, P.E. City of Meridian 33 Cast Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Gary: 11 September, 1996 ~FCE/I/E-C r~ ,,;,, , '!'Y EN'GIWrf~: I have looked into the circumstances surrounding the Goldsmith wel! to be used far pressurized irrigation of the Salmon Rapids and Los AIamitos Subdivisions. We have coordinated with Mike Teschner, of Mtn. Landscaping, to investigate the well and to recommend a monitoring plan for the well as required by the Meridian City Council. It is our understanding that Mtn. Landscaping is representing the developer, Marty Goldsmith, of Far West Development. Summary Details of well construction and production history are incomplete for the "Goldsmith" well. Available data suggest that the wcI! is relatively shallow and may be in hydraulic connection with surface water sources. The well is not difficult to measure under pumping ornon-pumping conditions and is equipped adequately for measuring water-level, flow rate, and total production. The nearby Babbitt and Shipley wells have been selected as observation wells to measure possible interference effects from Goldsmith well pumping. The two wells are of similar depth, are inclose proximity tv the Goldsmith well, and are owned by the two most interested parties to the dispute. A monthly monitoring program has been recommended for the first year to obtain baseline data. The frequency of measurements should be re-evaluated after year one and probably reduced. It is unlikely that the Goldsmith well will cause adverse effects to local area water levels, however, total gallons pumped must be reported to evaluate conditioned restrictions of the water right. Mtn. Landscaping has the necessary experience and equipment to obtain the necessary measurements to be reported to City of Meridian. History There is not a DriIler's Record on file with the Idaho Department of Watec Resources which matches the location or size of the 8-inch diameter irrigation well, hereinafter referred to as the "Goldsmith" well. The well has reportedly been inexistence for many years and had been previously used to irrigate the croplands surrounding the well. Water Rigllt 63- 02968 is associated with the well and has a priority date of 1953 for irrigation of 23 acres. The original Right, under the name of Thomas P. Gray, is volumetrically limited to 103.5 acre feet per annum and has a rate of flow restriction of .46 cubic feet per second (20G.44 gpm). Period of Use is from March 1 S-to-Nov. 15. Post•tY Fax Note 7$71 Date '1'db-`J9 d oope~~ TOBR~+aN ~Cot,t,. f`°"' LWuR.W Bu R1 Co JDeot. Co. PhOnO N PIgM ~ Fix 3 -0~~1 FaxN FER-27-913 ©9:43 AM RIF"ART CLARK ~~33'S57 P•@~ • • ..1 This Water Right is a "supplemental" right which is to say that it may be used as a "back- up" in years when surface water rights may not be available or are reduced. The supplemcntaI nature of the original right is associated with the way in which the water was historically used. A Transfer of Water Right, approved June 2Z, I995, is formally conditioned that the new owner, Far West Development, shall use their full allotment of surface water rights prior to use of groundwater rights. A neighbor, Gene babbitt, recalled that, "the Goldsmith well was drilled in 1964 for Uie landowner, Jerry McDermott, who farmed 50 acres using a combination of canal water and groundwater from the well". Babbitt thought the well was originally drilled to 130 feet by Randall Drilling of Meridian. Although Darrell Randall did drill many of the local area wells, there is not a record of an 8-inch McDermott welt in the IDWR ftles. It is not entirely clear whether this is the original well drilled in the 1950's, if this is a replacement well drilled by McDermott, or if the wcIl was drilled more recently than the water-right, as a supplemental well in times of limited surface water supply. It is likely that some of these questions might be answered through an in-depth review of the Water Rights file at IDWR, This is beyond the scope of your request and we have not requested the file Site survey The location of the Goldsmith well is shown on Figure 1 to be in the SE, NI's, SE 1/4 of Section 19, T3N, R1E just south of the Eightmile Lateral where it crosses Locust Grove Road. An 8-inch steel casing extends 1.2 feet above the pumphouse floor {Figure 2} wlvch is essentially ground level. The existing pump is a 300 gpm Crown bH-300 submersible pump with 4-stages on a 20 HP Franklin motor installed by Burgess Pump Co. The pump is equipped with an Associated Coil variable frequency drive, a measuring port, an airline, and a 4-inch McCrometer {MW-500} flowmeter. This is an inline propeller flowmeter prefabricated inside of a flanged length of pipe with flow vanes. According to John Burgess, the total depth of the well was 71 feet below top of casing at the time of pump installation.. On July 1, 1996, Jeff Allred attempted to plumb the total depth of the well, with the pump installed, and could not lower a weighted steel tape beIvw 76.5 feet. He pulled out and measured 57 feet of airline which was reinstalled in the well and the air gage calibrated to sounded water levels. The pumping and static water-levels arc not difficult to measure with either steel or electric well sounders, On this date, Jeff measured pumping water-level at 15:19 hours at 35.40 feet below top of casing with the well pumping at 120 gpm. Totalizer read 7,330,000 gallons at the time of this tnessurement. The pump is set to operate between 40-and-65 !b. of pressure. From a previous reading of 5,574,800 gallons on June 10, 1996 at 14:00 hr., an average pumping rate of 57 gpm is calculated fora 21 day period (exactly 21 days, 1 hour and 17 minutes; 30,317 min.) of time. A static water-level for the Goldsmith well was not obtained because the well was in use during both of our site visits. Mtn. Landscaping measurements are typically taken • • .I only a few minutes after turning off the pump and, so, are not representative of complete recovery. Discussions with Mike Tcschner indicate that the welt does not draw down appreciably (<S feet) at typical pumping rates. Pumping water•level measurements taken while the discharge rate fluctuated between ZO and 100 gpm show that Iess than 3 fat of water-love! fluctuation occurs. Although the pump is capable of producing 300 gpm, the well does not apparently pump at higher rates for long, as evidenced by the 57 gpm average discharge rate. The ma~cimum discharge rate observed has been 120 gpm and this was for less than Z minutes. Mtn. Landscaping appears to be doing an adequate job of monitoring and our measurements are consistent with theirs. We understand that Mtn. Landscaping will report on their monitoring to the Meridian City Engineer's Office. Mtn. Landscaping's measurements to date are included as Attachment A. Liktlihood of well interference and recommended frequency of monitoring. The $abbitt and Shipley wells (Figure 1) are a good choice for monitoring the influence on local groundwater levels. In addition to being near the Goldsmith welt and completed to similaz depths, these wells belong to the parties concerned about possible impact from the Goldsmith well pumping. We recommend monthly monitorin~f water- ~VCI, total DrodUCtIOn, and dl5charQC rate (lf Dumninvl fnr fhr finl.iemitl, Rahh:-4 en.t wells ever the course of a year so that the seasonal groundwater fluctuation can :ified and separate~Tto'm possibTe'inter~`ererice eff ccts an~fo esfablis~i•liascTin`c water-levels for the m measurements per year. The Goldsmith well should be measured monthly through the winter (non-pumping) season for the first year (1996). Of particular importance aze the pre-irrigation season measurement, taken in early March, and the end of season pumping water level, measured in early November. For subsequent years, only the early March and early November measurements should be necessary with no winter measurements. We think it unlikely that pumping from the Goldsmith well will adversely impact water-levels in adjacent wells. The shallow depth of the wells and the Lack of significant low permeability sediments underlying 40-to-70 fact of Whitney terrace gravels (from drilicr's reports, Attachment B) strongly suggest that wells Iess that 150 feet in depth are in hydraulic connection with surface water sources. Owing to the preponderance of surface water courses (Eightmile Lateral, R.idenbaugh Canal, Tenntile Creek, and Fivemile Creek -see Figure t.} in the immediate vicinity, it is expected that recharge from surface sources imparts a stability to area water levels. This seems to be borne out by water-level measurements to date. Please call with any questions. Sincerely, Ed Squires r. as FER-'~7-98 p9;49 AM RING°RT CLARK: ~@g34~.,.,~' ~ . r figure 1. Selected well locations in southeast Meridian with respect to the "GoldsmitE~" well. Tlic Goldsmith well is proposed to be used for pressurized irrigation of residential lots within the Los Alamitos and Salmon Rapids Subdivisions. NORTii rtis-~~-'~}s 0~?:4y is hl F'itJ~ ~'T LLNF'Y .~•~ i r ~~+>3a2~ 7 a. b. P _ k7 5 Figure 2. 8. 8-inch well head and discharge piping for the Goldsmith well. Well is to be t-sed to supply pressurized irrigation to residential lots within the Los Alamitos and Salmon Rapids Subdivisions. b. Golcismitli well pumphouse. g-~,.~~ ~/ 2O /~ ~~ GaldsMlrt~. yt~~1~~O~.S( FEB-c-93 @9:543 iNM RING~~'T CLi-iFtK. <kj;~34~~ - ~ F•.t+7 _ ~ _~ j'~!'~ 3- 4 ~¢aSc~r«.q pp~~'~ {S ~p q~ ~-i.,c~ Cc~twq ~ .~J ,t,~ y a7 ~ ~ _9 ioo3~ ~~ az ~? ~ne1 d ~~` • l- ~t ~ I f S S~ 9 D FER-~~'-98 ~3:?:S@ AM RIN'-^RT CLARF~ 1 2a83 , -:57 r• F . ~~ ; ,.l f) Meridian City Council • January 6, 1998 Page 21 Come: Then my conversation with the City Attorney was a little bit wrong today then. Crookston: Apparently that was because the non-development agreement was put out with the documents with what you have been talking about. Morrow. The only -thing we have in our packet is the letter from Ms. Bowcutt under Briggs Engineering heading and then we have a copy of three pages of minutes where we as a Council discussed this July 15"'. I guess for point of discussion what is the answer to her question from Council? My answer is the private roads to those specs is fine. Come: Mr. Bentley? (Inaudible) Come: Okay Morrow. Do we need a motion to instruct the staff as such? Come: I would suggest that we do. Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the private roads in Honor Park Subdivision No. 3 to be a 50 foot right of way with a 37 foot back to back street section. Tolsma: Second Cowie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Tolsma, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #15: DISCUSSION OF WELL IN SALMON RAPIDS SUBDIVISION N0.4: Come: Evidently they are wanting to turn the ownership of the pressurized irrigation system to the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District, comments from Council? fs there anybody that would like to come up and give us the run down on that one? McCall: Thank you Mr. Mayor and Council, Brian McCall attorney for the developer. The CC&R's for both Salmon Rapids and Los Alamitos as amended require the pressurized irrigation system be turned over to Nampa Meridian Irrigation district. We are in the process of negotiating the turn over with them, it turns into a negotiation because they are not necessarily willing to accept it. There were a couple of outstanding issues and we are not dorm to one issue. The Council may recall that the prPSSU7zed irrigation system for those two subdivisions started with ground water out of a well that was located on the Salmon Rapids property. That well provided a water right to the Meridian City Council . • January 6, 1998 Page 22 developer that facilitated the pressurized irrigation of a certain number of lots. I forget right now how many it was but it was somewhere over 50 and under 100. It easily accommodated Salmon Rapids No. 1 and Los Alamitos No. 1. . As more lots were brought on line the need for additional water was satisfied by~ developing a very extensive pumping station that utilized surface ftom the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District. I think it came out of the Hunter's lateral. So now that place, that system is all in place. We have that pumping station and we have the Salmon Rapids well it is all interconnected. And there is enough capacity both in terms of water and in terms of pumping to do both subdivisions on all of their phases, 3 phases for Los Alamitos and ultimately 5 phases for Salmon Rapids plus the neighboring subdivision Raven Hills. The Council will also recall that in the original public hearing there was concern ftom a neighboring property owner Mr. Shipley that the use of the Salmon Rapids well may impact his well and other neighbor's wells. That was ultimately resolved by imposing into the findings of fact that the developer conduct certain monitoring. And there was discussion back and forth and inquiries made to the Department of Water Resources as to whether this was necessary. Quite ftankfy it was never totally clear as to whether this was the proper purview of the City Council or the Department of Water Resources. Nonetheless those welt monitoring conditions were placed in the findings of fact. Nampa Meridian now says that they would very much like to take on the whole system and have this well because it provides basically extra water and extra capaaty in a short year perhaps. However they won't take it with the well monitoring restrictions. That is the dilemma and they have asked us to approach the Council to see if the Council would relax and remove the well monitoring restrictions. I don't know what the Council's pleasure is on that. The only thing that I can suggest to them to you is in -the process of getting the Department of Water Resources approval to utilize this one ground water right that is on Salmon Rapids to have it transferred to all of Los Alamitos and to Raven Hill's the Department of Water Resources issued the developer a water permit. Just incidentally that water permit itself imposes certain restrictions that may or may not make the Council comfortable. The permit was granted in other words they can take this water out of that well and spread it over water on the other side of the street in Los Alamitos and spread it to Raven Hills. In so doing the restrictions are that the holder of the water right which currently is the developer that would transfer Nampa Meridian Irrigation District if they accepted it shall install a suitable measuring device or shall enter into an agreement with the Department to determine the amount of water diverted from power records and shall annually report the information to the Department. Another restriction that may or may not be relevant is that the water holder in the use of the Salmon Rapids well water or ground water shall only divert ground water under this right when water from the pertinent surtace water rights cannot be delivered to the right holder. There are other restrictions in terms of the quantity of water to be used per lot and the size of the lots.. So that is the predicament and quite frankly it was always my opinion for what it is worth that it wasn't necessarily an item that the City needed to involve itself with in the first place. In as much as the Department of Water Resources has mechanisms for resolving disputes between competing water uses. Now we are in a position where the transferee of our system is uncomfortable taking the system with those well monitoring conditions. That is the status. If we don't get those well Meridian City Council . • January 6, 1998 Page 23 monitoring conditions removed what will happen, I think that Nampa Meridian, we have persuaded and cajoled and done everything that we can to try to get-them to take them as is. We have even said, we have been monitoring it, we have hired a firm to monitor it and we have even said' that we continue to do that. They ~ said they are just uncomfortable with those conditions imposed, I think they would take the system without the well. In other words we cap the well, pull the pump off of that and use exclusively the pumping station and the surface water rights. I think Gary was a little uncomfortable with that and that is how this issue came up again. Bentley: Mr. Mayor, I can sympathize with you and your discussions with Nampa Meridian Irrigation. We have had a few dances with them ourselves. The problem I see with this is all of these discussions evolved out of public hearings with the concerns for Salmon Rapids and the wells and waters. Before I am prepared to make a decision on this I think we have to open it back up to the public. Since these facts came out of the public hearing. Morrow. I think Mr. Bentley's point is well made, I am in total concurrence with that. Very candidly the City has an obligation even though Mr. McCall and I somewhat disagree on this. My point is that if we are going to zone and annex ground we have an obligation to protect the neighbor's interest as we do that until such time as they are ready to zone and annex and develop or whatever the case may be. Clearly our intent as a City was to protect the water rights or the water availability of Mr. Shipley and the surrounding neighbors. I think also if memory serves me correctly one of the discussions that you and 1 had was that there were available water rights from Nampa Meridian that could be purchased for this ground or could be obtained from Nampa Meridian to supplement (inaudible). I think like Mr. Bentley if you are going to pursue the avenue of removing the restrictions on the well it needs to be done in the public arena. I think also however that the better way perhaps may be to pull the pump and cap the wail so it is no longer a threat to the neighbors. Therefore by removing the restrictions and .have the surface water that Nampa Meridian has available to run the system. McCall: If I could speak to that, I think that last is an acceptable option. We already have sufficient water rights. It was when Nampa Meridian said that they wouldn't take the well, that I believe the City Engineer was a little bit uncomfortable about us removing that from the pressurized irrigation system that had been in essence approved by this Council. Wondering then if the Council would be displeased that was taken out really kind of without the Council's permission. I may even be wrong about the motivation for that. The solution that you suggest is certainly available. We can say to Nampa Meridian here is the surface water system, here is the pumping station, you don't get the well and we will cap it, and if everybody is comfortable with that, that is a route we can go. Bentley: Mr. Mayor, I would like to hear Gary's input on this please. Meridian City Council ~ • January 6, 1998 Page 24 Smith: Thank you Mr. Mayor and Council members, I guess first I have a comment and then t have a questions .for Brian. First of all that well is capable of pumping approximately 300 gallons a minute as I understand it. At the present time the City of Meridian invests about'/4 million dollars every time we drill a domestic water well. From my standpoint as Public Works Director, from my Water Superintendents standpoint we vuouid rather not see that water that we are spending so much money to get from 700 foot depth be placed on lawns. We have an opportunity -here to have the well interconnected with the surtace water that is available to the property that will supplement the sprinkling operation when the surface water is no longer available. That is a comment. My question I guess to Brian would be is what problem does Nampa Meridian have, what is their actual problem in accepting this well. If it is a problem of measuring the water levels twice each year we will do it. I would recommend that we do it and we monitor the wail for them if that is the problem. If it is something else I would be curious to know why they don't want to accept the ownership of this well and the operation of it. McCall: I really can't, I think originally they do surface they don't do ground water. I mean it was kind of an unknown. Then Mr. Anderson actually got kind of enthused with the idea of having this extra capacity and he said are there any strings attached and I said quite frankly I think there are a couple of problems. Number one we need to go to the Department of Water Resources and make sure you can use this water on Raven Hills, he said we will do that and we did it. Then they said what are these water monitoring conditions and we explained them to them and their Council said no they just don't want it with those water monitoring conditions and .would we please go to the Council and ask the Council to remove them. And maybe further discussions with Nampa Meridian as to whether it is a question of cost. Because it is not costly, it was $750 a year and now it is down to $300 a year, it is nothing. Maybe it is an assumed liability to Mr. Shipley, I don't know I can certainly pursue that and I quite frankly have been a little bit out of the loop on that. It has been (Inaudible). It sounds like your input is that you would like to keep this in the system if possible. - Smith: That would be my suggestion to Mayor and Council and Brian. I really think it is a very valuable asset to have for that pressurized system out there. It is serving as you mentioned three different subdivisions along with the surface water from the Hunter's Lateral and it is well worthwhile to maintain. Morrow. Mr. Mayor, Gary I have a question here, what if the City take ownership of that well and in essence sell the water to those homeowners associations prior to April 15"' and after October 15"'? Smith: Well I guess the same thought ran through my mind Councilman Morrow, I don't know what ramifications that has from our legal standpoint of being able to do that. I don't know Meridian City Council January 6, 1998 Page 25 McCall: My own thought on that is it gets back to when this Council as other communities develop this concept of pressurized- irrigation the obvious question was asked well who is going to run these are homeowners associations going to run them or are developers going to hang onto them forever. I think this Council has moved in the right direction by saying we already have an institution out there that knows water so let's give it to the irrigation district. My client originally contemplated hanging onto it. We made inquiries with PUC and found out that the amount of regulation involved in a private developer hanging onto one of these small water systems is enormous and it wouldn't work worthwhile. So ws were then going to tum it over to the homeowners association and the Council said no don't do that give it to Nampa Meridian Irrigation District and I think that ultimately makes sense as long as we can get them to be somewhat more cooperative. Smith: Mr. Mayor and Council I might make one other comment, one of our sister cities Nampa to the west of us, has operation and maintenance responsibilities for a aty wide pressurized irrigation system. That system includes numerous water wells, it includes numerous points of take out of surface water from canals and other ditches. .They operate that as a City and they assess all the users within the City a very modest sum. I am only saying that from the standpoint of the ownership and operation of this particular well. I am not encouraging the ownership and operation of ail of the systems within the City as a aty system. From the standpoint of this particular well it is being done in Nampa city wide there. I don't know maybe Wayne Crookston can research it or maybe he has an answer as to legally if we are able to do that. Crookston: Mr. Mayor and Council and I do not have an answer at this time for that question. Come: I think it begs to be explored a little bit more. I know it is kind of putting you on the spot Wayne but when it ever comes down to water I think we had better be pretty correct. Council suggestions that we further look into it? Morrow. I think the steps are two fold, one is that we have had the discussion with Mr. McCall in the past and it seems obvious to me that we explore the options that we have as a City and then we have a public hearing as Councilman Bentley suggests the neighbors that are involved in this have an opportunity to testify. And press forward with whatever suggestion comes from that meeting. Smith: Mr. Mayor, I would just tike to make one more comment, I think I have made it before, right now we take our water rights and the water that is available to us for granted. The day is coming in not too far in the future that we are going to be scrambling for water. This is an opportunity that we have to utilize and existing facility for the purposes of non-domestic use. Thank you Corrie: We will look into that then. E0 ' 3Jtid 0S : b Z 86 ~ 8Z Had ~0'd ~d101 • • i io~.$atatataaa Q$7a ~ Ri~$$ema~3~"~i aQmSm~aeatsa°c~ ma aaaesa~ ~g W ON Nry7 V1!~~ °~' ~ ~~im mMMNH~~~~~mht0~1N~~~~~~~M ~~y~~NtoNN~h~ .~~~~WN m~ < H $ao_ci`3'B8'8 `~o`ac`~~+8'B ~~cod~~8`8~g~o~dd_8~ o~~ io`d i`8'88i~~i'~' aW~< S g~a(l~a(-' Sq as Kaa-" saga---nY~, w ~W W ~ W ~ClC 7. ~~ 4'6'0."~K <~aR~N X0.6 O. ~ W O. O-_ _ _ y Sw?:r2 c~ I 2L'~, O S~~^z' ~ So ~60<5,~zz22g~Z~2~z2222 ~OOO~z2Y2x _~O~S=~`~Z~esnaoR ~~3~~~~~v`~~u~u~~~~ ~~~_ss°z° ~= ~T°s~° ~~zz~z"m'+°s s° ¢~~ zx,.~_s RR2i3 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~y~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~ m ~ ~ ~ '~, ~~ 00 ~~pp M~J pp a ~ W ~ J ~ m Ci h ONN N/fp ~ O~ pp NSSNNNf7NSSSSN PIgNOCI ~(f N1A b~)C94)OOwSNiOSS{9 N!'!l9 LL ~f7 y. YJNYYY j1,f Y~YJ yyY YYi~ y~,y~yJYYYYY%Y, y, yJ YYYY ^YYisf `~Y,YYYNYY Yys 15 ~yy~(NO ^~--no00 ~' mm8l8p~S~lmpppw.m.ppm~ppm~id~ppl~mp~m~ppmmmR~B~~mmmmmmm8l~'~m~pp~m7~mywmmm~m.~8l~mpmmmmma~ aR~p~~Y~~~p~ ~ PSd~n~41~i ~OO~O~OpOQY~ tl OA00-SCI7OOSN~~ O Nf $° =~=--~~$ wC ~f1~~7k~~ Woooooso~~oooSOs~~ooo00~~5~05oooo`g55~ogo5~oo55$~0000~o<5oai°~°~ ~ .I orJ} J J J J J J J ,,,I J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J ,~ ~I J J J J ..J .I ~ al J J J J ~~ Jpp J J ..1 .J O J a J J a 16 6 ~f g m ,~ R C1 nn_ gN IrO (y nn hn eeeneee nn !~ nA A h 1~ n~. ~~ ~~ N N N LL ev N NN N N N N N N N N N 1 r°-ZZ°~ g°cZ888~-~?~°°S~c°~°oggo og°cacoeeg!oQog°cc°goooo°cmoo° i v~~ss~°o~s~~sooo'a~os~Qs2`< _~j =zY° ZZ ZZ~ .2_ ~jZ ~ _ Z s°o~alii, °_°_°__OWWW W°W° $$°73~ss~a~wdl'~~'~S~gi~addZ~3seQ-<a'2~'~~4z3z35 ~y~ ~~a s o°°° <a_6ooo0o Wi ssoooocWa7S~5 _Z°wooo r~msrco:'~o5~aar~$afa°~~ya~~8z8~-4~a~z~-z8ya' rcrczavr&~Y &&8 ' vSI' ~Z~m:c ~.TIlm®~ O W Q W W W~! W~O W W W W W OS~ffi W W W W I (jj~~~ W W W W W ~~~QW W Z~m-~i®~f~2~~m.~il~I'~~22m:c~t Sta S'~~~i~~~~~K3 S'S'~~~~~~~oSc S~~r' i ,rya 4 ~~ ~~ ~a' 3~ a~ d ~au :3' Cana 4 ~ ~ ~~ Q'~'~~o ~ adf3`8'~ v,c d_w 8 } awod i_Q 8B~'d o ~ ' W.q a~ w ~-yggl~ a gg,,J~ < yy~'- gg ssa a ~ o p >~I~~~yI~~~~ }~~{-m{~~IWmW aac c '<`a~3¢~~Y~~a}3MZ~~o ~LL`a~~jBaLL~ga~}adc or>~,rs~}rc~ ;g i (y '~j W~ WI FI~~ W W 1d W <~~~ W W W L~ ~. }~~,I ~.Z- k W qy/i a~~y~~CK K'~ y4dK ~ ¢¢$~~~ .6Q W Jy S W W CWWW9ad m mmo SS ~~ a'~5J ~~ii O~J~~S IQ'Et7 W i W mm~~a ~~. S~,.}sC_ ~~ SNCf f z ?~3 ~AN~~~~12tn_J~1~7~18 W {J <~YyJ,~ m ~y ~l{~f ~! ~.,ur 1~~td~u ej qq ~i O>•C~e-7aa-V' Ij FS U p~~3~555Sm?~W53~S~Q: ~»55 y!SBi~SSWS~~~'i'i~IWINS;~>5 O- W tqV S>qW N.~~ to tl~ 0W i4 C)N C)NI ~NN~N(/1OV1 ~ W~SvINhVf 'T.!fANyv~N OD~N3SSv~.,Z'~ W -yW W I ~g~~~~~~A~~~~~~~I~~~°~e~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~R~~~?N~A W N ! I Y I O gpti O ~ ; W I Z W U ~ ~ ~. w as g ~J Y IY = r- H ~~ ~ IBC ~ '~ ~Z ov a`~ ~ mm ~ '~ aH ~o ~ ~ w I ~ z ' a ~ J y t~ yC~QUj i a ~ W laU Q; ~ ~jU WSQ ~'7~{!~'~ y +y qq~ `a J Q}[ ,d O W ~7-a »a' } ~U«U Wa' W,Y dW dW 1 W ~~ Y i (J x ~?>~< W b a Z W ~ y a~ Q d. ~ U ~ LL W 0 U} W J~ a U 2~ a' W C W Z Z ~ ~ H' ~ t~ W S IW } N -0 ~ qp S -0 J J ~_~ d841y0~YGa°}d~IJ Wi-O(-~ m0~~~ z Y '~. ~.W~~S rO kp~a'`?Z-~f4 Cf ~-K }mod ~ pQ z ° C y m W N ~n62 Qp1~u o! .!K ~1- O- "0 Vtl a!!<<~ Wtlul¢ pp~~ <Y<WZ~ u~MfA 2~ZW~W~~d~N`~t1~4~i Y~tKJ<~~}O~W iW~UW~w ~p m.3~ wJ~yJD ~~aW ~YZ'SFpZ yg '6 QC]~~ 4O I.-4j 7QQ .~~1 ~W 2 V~ M W J°oU< W rb Z_ el~w mZ~~Q<~~][/ay6~[O~~~OJ OJ ,'l. Q: I~yLLKO~~~ ~ ~~~maz~ i o8~ m ~wCaZ/!O ~I~j 6 =zvaa $~_~Q 1Way' W Y }~4eJe ~yJ(~~zKS r~~~QxYyGy W~y}y! ~+Q~ Q y -yy W Z~Z ~O OV ~ ~ ..I ~ V W V C~j Y ~pCC ~IIW+~~y' C W ~~m ZY~za"~^'•pL Or {2 W _UZ <~~ SAOQ.S a ~~ W V W W ~ ~~8¢ zBz;O zY ¢¢ ~WU.rn G74Um< ~ I-U yQ y~911Y~ O I~~ ~ WC7 0000 O ~-oaa i 4' OOf71 ~ ~7''S ~f~l L4 W K~~ O} W Z R'a' a'N V Z<~?y~>Z J E!) ~G~O pZ ~Jy~ ~~ll~~ ° ~~, (/J~ I.N. N a•'S~ } W 1W~ W.~ ~~g3 ~~ulJ oZ 3~O W;W~~ W ~`~W',~q~~Zr~(p C7a W i~F=~J W ~NIY IL~:2Y~t~ Q W{U~~4 ~}JZ~~W'Cdg I ov~i~~w3u' ~~~_~~~~~~~~~g~~17.n~uz,vc~i~~m?~~~~~~o~~z<CSY<~'x~6mg~~~f~/ViV0007~~tANaUi ~0°0$_$5QQ30 °°N I$n°O$°tl°°m~+e0.$ ~°°~t°~° Ri°4X ~a°8gln~~°!!g°g~~$$g°'1A Sl~ir$°v _g $~~JS I ~~e9's°r°~I~SdS ~~r i^S~ ~$8 s~~ o8s~88if~- Zi 2f LS$g mm ~~• nn 9i n AAnR9~~ eTi ~.~R$~I~i~e'$'~5~.'B ~~~IIQp~~~f~lWQpp l~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ([qy~p~~ ,sv.~va~gsg aA ~ h M1I~ A fG ~ ~Ipp {p ~~ tl~b O ~~pp ~ ~~ ~ O ~~pp ~~pp ' mmtlOOb~ ~~ ~ n n A A IA ~~ O A n A A A A h h A n A A A Q Q ! t 0 aa~zmm~za~a~m ~~~rccaszrcmrc E&eczamazrcrc~mSxammrc~z ama~~maSiv"-av, ~ A D A S A S S A.~ A D~.~.~ A N S S.~.~ .' D S. T I A A S S .' C A A D A A Z I D D: i l D D D A.~ A D A.~ A A A~ D A.~.~. Z l S~ •aa aaa V va V V V V.iv-~.1vv.~./v V V vv V va.~+1 V.'v~v V v.~./ V.~.~vvv.~.'v ./v~.~vav m m: ~. m m m O~ ~W 0D Ol d O/ Ol Ol 1O~l _- Ol Ol O/ 01 O/ w Ol Ol Ol Ol OD Ol OD Ol Ol 01 Ol Ol 01 Ol Ol CD W W W Ol 01 OI 01 P W O A O Ce O~ 01 CO m W ~yQ$y$,yy,,++,''~}g$}pp~~ (~1 ~ rQy~f[~~ v.~.1„V V V V~[ v V tQpXp~± ./.~.~./v .~ V vv.~r V r Gp t{//~~ 44~1~~11 y0y110~ Qr5jt~pp ~Qj Vlr 0{00{~041 fWO4.i1 N ~ ~N(pp ~'~a'~[{{,, p~p NpNp ~{y~~1p7pp.p ~~1pp ppO~~ N t0pp00 pp~1{{O~~1pNp~1 ~t~~~1 ~~0jj ~{0l~~1440/1y00N~p414N477 O O p iOJ1 0 0 0 N 0 G p~ O O N 0 0 O O O O O O~ 0 0 0~ S O O O O p O O 0 O S~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ivJl 0 D ,AtuAtn;mm 7cmyD TSOTy Z7c Om7c 2~1-Zm AOt/1Ntp;TAm~y<~MTtA;tm-1 mmc~r p O r A D A A~ ~ A r pt C O~ Z m A~< O A~ ~ Z O m~ r; fn D O O O r C D m A ~ A m C Dr r r p 2 m S Iii S A y Z y C ~ y r_ Z~~ m m~ D C A yyN m C r A C ,A p 71 r C Z r S m=~zC Sp~Z Z~cASmN;~~nC=mS N G)W ZS~A~mTA mmC~ Ors OG~HOO~ ~ y2~~ O~.my~~ S ~m;v'p~°Z rit ^1g~Z m~"^lm<O~z m~i ~m~zQ ~ z ANC1N yypZpr-10 ~A~m~AZ AtnPrp~~A1 ASNOApAtZAA7cGN ~ NZ '~7C AA2 p-y~,p2p2 m;®.~ O O p 0 0 0 A m y~ i 0 m n my Z O O S y Z~ 2 A S~ p m N~ m~ rn O y A A~ 0~< y A A m O Z r 0 mmZmA« ACDOS-~~Z~O yyZZO-+ ~OmZmj 2 Z~~~~f~f m mOP AZ~Z Om2 Z r~+ftrtf~D~rpp00 A 02 ;OyZU~ Z~r Zmm~Zm222OZ ~nCC m0 pm O Cym mm d O~ pm CPp-Ar'y~Pr<CS'1r..0~~mZN OmArtlyr~7rC ~~CD~t°i~ mmD D rriP7C5Y~ ~jr 'yOZm ~OP2PymDA rmm '~A P ZOprO Z O AAyP APP P 0000y0 7~rODSm00~ ZmAymm mPa<mAPSS~r~Z~'bCOPA'~m~jmZ C y 7c ~~ZA r.tpp ~ ~ ym m ~< m~0 ~<yt,r$rmay mmD~ P~ CZ~ c. mm O S Am Pmt- m A m Py P!n yr m y i iZD 7C~ (SA tAi~~p2~A ,~, fDA f~A =APmZZAi P yZr~m L7 ymr-PPy 7C Pp-P im ?AiG) =ZP~P=~~!Z- m fill 'nZAnl" i =ilk<P RI$y-PT~C` ~ r~~$m m~ ~. ~.m A A= ~ S P A p` ~ r A ~ 1 r. ~ C p y m~ i ZZ Z~ O D~~ n Z m< AO m CZ'l A T D D n H 2 H ~- r 'i i y y y O O O 2 Z y y T y = ~ O ~ y~ D 7[ m ~ p ° ° ZD m Ar it ii v ~ ~ N A 7c < ~ n O > O A r ~ y -~ S S m A 2 D A -~ y ; D m 7C u) y y A < < A m ~ p O a A y G7 D .a y Z m ~1 N m f~i 11yy N N N J N N N N N N N N a N N N~ N yJ 41 y1 N N N N N N r N N N N N r_ N N m N N r a a N N N N~ N N~ py{Q~l!r pW IQ (O fD fyN1 V V O+ 01 OI {{y/J~~1 Ol yyW11 pOp11 OI OI O N 01 OI O mp O1 ~ ~Np N m (N~pp N ~~Vpp~ O~ pf ppppl~l 4m1 N V1 yO1 {N/11 {y11~ {fJ~~ 41 {1~ yV11 {N/~ N~ pp1 p O OI N N~ {J~ ~ O tl~ O V~ 10 - ~~ O ~ O u N ill m 1D L M N i Y m liS ~ O v W N~ O V O N N~ N Y O O a Y u O N O N~ N m m;; N;;~ N; td td N N N N~ tIi w N fI/ y m. D <5 N m NC N; N N`= N N N N (/1 ~~ O ~ns A N5 4s/ u~~ NS m N ~ Cl `` m; O nNN-.ONNy~i/1~~~~2~~~~~m C~;mN~AT ~j V1~RiT ~~~~~~r ~:y fil ~ilA~-yi f~l;~G '~irti; t/m~NO y D D A> D D m> m m m '~ m m> m m r< g~ 0 0 m~ r m> m r p m m m m r i~ m O m m~>> m m m fft O h m> N u O f.~y~~mm~mmmt5r mm/-'RmmrSr m-1 ~'Zmrr~i mgm~ymmmm~S~< zm^'ymmmN^'y~ rtlNf 9 D D D D D D A D A y D D A A y y O A Z y D y A y< D S A A y m 0 D A A O D T Z y 0> < < < r < < y ~ < T .Z1~ N T T ~ m y T < 71 ~ ~~ 7I A N fd Z ~ T T Z { O V ~ 9 ~ ~ r ~ _ ~ r r _ r r _ ~ ~ r _ ~ _ y r ~ O O O O y O O O N y < 0 y 0 O j O O O O y O O O A O G m A m N N N N N N U1 N N N !ANlAN W N N {N; ~ ~ ~ r ~ D r~ ~ ~ D ~ D r ~ D r~ ~ ~ D r~ ~ ~ ~< < i i i i i i m; i i i i i i i m i i i i i i i m i Z i i i i i m mi i i i i i m i m i i m m m i i i i m m i i i i m m m m m m O m m m m m m m m O m m m m m m m O m> m m m m m Q m m m m m O m Q m m Q Q O m m m m Q O m m m m A A A-A A .~ y A'9 .~ A a A A Ain A A A S z z A vl A i A A 9 A A y A 9 A A 9 A j~1 A y A A V1 M V1 p A A D y y .~ 9~ D _oQOOOOm_gcoogogv_mggoQooomo~ogQogm°OgOe m_pmQgmmm-Qg$mm-ggvs ~iiz~izi°iZZZi~z~~Z°zlzrzt~Z~Zi~Z°~ZO~i~i~i~Z~Z°~~~~~~0~°~~OOs~~~~OO~~~~~ m a m m m m m o m m m O O O C 0 0 41 ~ O O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O O ~ O m O 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O ~ O C ~ 41 41 O O O O u ~ 0 0 0 0 ~a~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Y~~~~~~N~~~~$~Y~~~~~~~~~~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N pl ~ N N N N N N N {S{~ S S ~i _S S S'i ppad1 Qsp~1 p.p~1 p.p~1 pit ~i1 pit S_+' qq~ Qa~ ppit~ pwrp11, ppit1 p~p11 v v p:~1 - pp-~1 S Ol m V N v V Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol S S S P 0 S 01 Ol 01 0 P u Ol Ol r r~ r~ r r r r r r r r r r ~p r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r O O O D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m -A y~ -1 ,~ y ~-1 y y y y y y y y~ y y y y y y y y y '~i y y y y y -1 y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y ~i y y ~/ y y y y -1 0 r l,n ,~„~. _r+r+ pp.+~pp-oNOOOi.mpp~ oNao~g~a f."$$S °OQY••~fa'41uom ~ m m m m a W r N r 0 Ol V N 10 - N N N V Ol m• O O V O N v r ID N W m N V V 10 W m N 7rC 7c ~ 7rC N x m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ~~ m m m m m m m m m m m m m~ m~ m m m m m m m m m m m m m~ m O U N ~ x ~ 7C ~ 7C 7C x 7C N x 7C 7C x x JC 7C X u 7rC 7C 7C ~ 7rC 7C x 7C 7C x 7C x 7c x x 7C ~ 7C 7C ~ xp 7rC 7C x x 7C 7rC JC x N x ~• r p r p 41 u N W~~ N N O O W Y f!1 u N N~ {!~ N f!~ 41 Y N fO.t u N O W O O N V N N N~ P 1/ W i P P °u u N N N~ u r r • m i, • • i O O N y N m a m • ~~~~x~~~~~~D~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m S S 7+c S 7+c S i i= i i i i i i r i i i i i i i i i i i i S i i i i i i i i i i i i i i pp i i i~ i ppi i i ppi i S i D D>>> D 2 Z y 2 2 2 2 2 2~ 2 2 2 Z P 2 2 Z 2 Z 2 2 2 j Z Z Z 2 2 Z Z 2 Z 2 Z Z Z Z 2 2 2 2 Z 2 2 2 2 Z 2 j 2 yyzyz-,vvy_v-- D D D D D D O O D 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O D O mT Ry1 T(AN m(pNN(/1 N fA (A lAyNfA NIq N(/1 Nf/141mNd1NNNf/1 VlU1N 4/NNNNNN!/1 (ANmmN(/1 fA (/1mN m m (/1 !/f y(pHy41N y!/1 (A V1 (ANN Nln G(q lp 47 f/1MN(dM V/y f//(p Nln f/1 V1 f/1 fp 41 fd fl)N to V1 (A fI)m U1mf/)fI)tA VlNmyal D > mm mmmmmm mmmmmmmmmm~fmm mmGGOmmmOGOm~!mmmmNmmmm~mmmmmmmm m~k m m NN n~l~~u~~.l~ ~~~~.luww~.l~ W~M w~~!~~wa41 t~.1 ~ia (.1+~~~.~++~+~~~~.++ W N (q ~Z i -3s `1~r~~i ~-l`'i ~ ~ `~k `~ <<<i ~ ~u ~Z ~ 3 ~~~ ~ ~l Salmon Rapids Homeowners roe and Carmen Larrondo Linda Ann Johnson Assocation 2602 Mesa Way 1301 E. Time Zone Drive P.O. Box 252 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83680 ruce & Sher Ellin t n Ili C t ti I ry g o ons ruc on, nc Roger & Karen Haamacher 2535 S. Velvet Falls Way 5256 Crimson 9055 Highlander Road Meridian, Idaho 83642 Boise, Idaho 83703 Boise, Idaho 83709 Richard & S d T ll B an ra a on urbank Living Trust Scott & Rochelle Hersley 2550 Velvet Falls Way 2523 S. Weber Rapids PI. 1393 E. Time Zone Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 2 r 3~~ ~~ ~, ~ ~ -~ ~~:~ ~l "1 ~ ~~~~l~ ~-`~ 21 ~ ~r~i~~~ j ~ ~c~ Belinda K. McGilvery Sa~mon Rapids Subdivision Farwest Developers, Inc. 2554 S. Weber Rapids PI. Homeowners Association 4550 W. State Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 4550 W. State Street Boise, Idaho 83703 Boise, Idaho 83703 ~c~t & V ~ hl f r era c o man G enn & Lisa Wiedmeier Richard & Llsa Vause 11333 Camas 2582 S. Weber Rapids PI. 2555 S. Weber Rapids P1. Boise, Idaho 83709 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 ZI';~' 1(~~-~ ~~t~ ~ r`~Sf'`~«f ~ ~s- 713s~`~~r~1 ~~ Steve and Leslie Tucker Marshall & Karla Williams Christian Bourguignon 8272 Colt Drive 2830 Duane Drive 2607 Ellis Avenue Boise, Idaho 83709 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Boise, Idaho 83702 Kenneth & Donna Coffey ~raig & Angie Frazee Nancy Mortensen 1160 W. Kimra 2569 S. Velvet Falls Way 2612 S. Weber Rapids PI. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~ ~3 ~" ` i (F~ I ~CC Robert & G S 21 ~3 ~ ~C<<1 ~3L~1 2 I ~3 ~`~ (r ~l 3 C %~ ayan aucerman Stanley & Joy eagler Ro ert & Dolores Smith 2596 S. Weber Rapids PI. 2577 S. Weber Rapids PI. 2590 S. Weber Rapids PI. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~13~`~~~~z/ 3~~3 2i 3 ~~i~~~/ 3n~/ Z~3~~~CP~I 3C~J Shane & Jennifer Glenn Bruce & Shawna Chadwick Anthony Ares 181 N. Liberty #1 2596 S. Velvet Falls Way 2599 S. Weber Rapids PI. Boise, Idaho 83704 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Charles & Marty Bergey Trust Chad & Terra Inman Jon & Tamara Jones 2698 Mesa Way 2634 S. Weber Rapids PI. 2604 S. Velvet Falls Way Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~'~ ~~-~ .~;~~n ~r~ ~ p~C~ S ~~ll~~,- ~~Pl'~ ~ ~~.~~1/~ z i ~~qr~~~ ~~~~ Mini Mansions Inc. 10228 Duck Lane Nampa, Idaho 83686 1`~~ r~F~i"~if~- ~aniel & Nicole Krishnek 1229 E. Reside Way Meridian, Idaho 83642 21 ~3~ `~i (~~ I ~31 S Edmund & Melva Mattson 2612 S. Velvet Falls Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~argo Arineke `~ f '~ 2637 S. Weber Rapids PI. Meridian, Idaho 83642 TI' ~ `"~1C~~{ 3~ 1 Todd & Sheryl Farnham 261.1 S. Velvet Falls Way Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lori & Darrin Krafft 2703 S. Weber Rapids PI Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~~ 3 ~ `iC.~~c! ~~ 3 C.E. McDonald 2889 Mesa Way Meridian, Idaho 83642 Z13~ `1(~l S 3c-> Robert & Jennifer Glenn 3086 Mesa Way Meridian, Idaho 83642 7 / 3~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ > 3 John & Stanley Shipley 2770 S. Locust Grove Road Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~~I ~~`~Uy 3ic~ Weldon & Betty Hill 2615 S. Weber Rapids PI Meridian, Idaho 83642 z ~ ~~~ ~~c,~~( 313 Borup Construction Inc. 38 E. Ada Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 2 r 3 ~ 1 C~~l 31 C~ Richard & Charlette Krumm 2603 S. Velvet Falls Way Meridian, Idaho 83642 7/ 3~`~~~~/ 3/ 1 Michael & Tanya Gotcher 2680 S. Weber Rapids PI. Meridian, Idaho 83642 David Alexander 2659 S. Weber Rapids P1. Meridian, Idaho 83642 113 `~.<jc~~ 3~ s Raymond & Cynthia Larrondo 2776 Mesa Way Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~1 ~~~~ `=~l~~I Gene & Margaret Schultz 2955 Mesa Way Meridian, Idaho 83642 Marguerite Agnew 1560 E. Victory Road Meridian, Idaho 83642 Richard & Linda Schaffer 1780 E. Victory Road Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~~ ~, ~.? 13 ~ ~~ C~~-j ~ I I White & Sons Construction 565 Jackson Street Boise, Idaho 83705 ~~i 3,~`7C<<~ ;~l Louis & Bonnie Dyas 3675 Lamont Road Meridian, Idaho 83642 2 ~ ~~`~C~~f "31'1 Kenneth & Heidi Neitzel 2656 S. Weber Rapids PI. Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~ '3 ~ `I ~~ ~ ~<~ Matthew & Karye Huck 2637 S. Pine Bar PI. Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~~ ~~~~~p~~ ~ ~ lark Barnett 2681 S. Weber Rapids PI. Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~i 3 ~ `I'~f~~ 3~ Fannrest Developers, Inc. & Marty Goldsmith 2725 S. Weber Rapids PI. Meridian, Idaho 83642 213~`~~'~~ c~~~ Mark & Kimber y arr n~ton 2955 S. Locust Grove Road Meridian, Idahoj 83642 213 ~ `~~~1 3 3~ Clifford Babbit 11681 W. Amity Road Boise, Idaho 83709 ~p,N ~ ~ 8~ ~~`° aPR N ~ 11 1998 ~ / USP%