Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJanuary 21, 2010 MinsMeridian Planning & Zoning January 21, 2010 Page 2 of 12 Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to accept the agenda. All those in favor say aye. Opposed the same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 3: Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of January 7, 2010 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting: B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 09-012 Request for Conditional Use Permit for aSelf-Service Storage Facility consisting of 10 buildings on approximately 3.49 acres in an existing C-G zoning district for Linder Self-Service Storage Facility by Chip Gallagher -east side of Linder Road, approximately'/4 mile north of McMillan Road: Rohm: All right. At this time the Consent Agenda has two items on it. Item A is the approval of the minutes from the January 7, 2010, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and the second item is the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for approval of CUP 09-012. Are there any changes to the minutes? Marshall: I have none. Rohm: Okay. Could I get a motion to accept the Consent Agenda? O'Brien: So moved. Marshall: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to accept the Consent Agenda. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 4: Continued Public Hearing from December 3, 2009: MCU 09-002 Request to modify the building elevations approved with the Conditional Use Permit for Avendale (fka Silver Oaks) by Engineering Solutions - north side of W. Franklin Road, approximately'/4 mile west of N. Ten Mile Road: Rohm: Okay. The next item on the agenda is a continued public hearing from December 3rd, 2009, of MCU 09-002 for Avendale fka Silver Oaks. And there has been a request to continue that to February 11th and at this time I am looking for a motion from the Commission to either continue it to that date or another date. Meridian Planning & Zoning January 21, 2010 Page 3 of 12 Marshall: Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion that we continue MCU 09-002, to the regularly scheduled meeting of February 11th. O'Brien: Second. Rohm: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to continue public hearing from December 3rd, 2009, MCU 09-002 to the regularly scheduled meeting of February 11th, 2010. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 5: Public Hearing: CUP 09-013 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Church on approximately 4.65 acres (proposed Lot 1, Block 1 of the Five Twelve Subdivision) in an existing R-8 zoning district for Five Twelve LDS Church by Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints -west side of Stoddard, midway between Overland Road and Victory Road: Rohm: Okay. At this time I'd like to open the public hearing on CUP 09-013 and begin with the staff report. Parsons: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. Before you this evening is a conditional use permit for a church use in an R-8 zoning district. If you will recall at your last meeting you -- the Commission acted on the preliminary plat on this lot where the church is proposed to be located on was a lot that was in the process of being created through the platting process. The property is situated between Overland Road and Victory Road on the west side of Stoddard. Again, it's currently zoned R-8. To the north is RUT property in Ada County. To the south is single family residential property, zoned R-4. To the east -- excuse me -- to the west is also R-8 zoned property and that was the previous platted property known as Bear Creek West. That plat has expired. And, then, to the south you have Ada County residential -- or Ada County property zoned RUT as well. The application before you tonight, again, is a CUP and also design review for the site improvements. This is pretty much what you saw with the preliminary plat. You can see the church site, the improvements, the access points. I believe at the last hearing Commissioner Newton-Huckabay made some reference to the access to Stoddard. At the time you looked at that plat we did not have comments from ACHD. When I was doing the staff report for this project I contacted ACRD and asked them to submit comment to us. They did that in the form of draft comments. They aren't official yet, but for the record their draft comments made mention to this application and it was their recommendation that that access on Stoddard Road be shifted and shared along the southern boundary. So, if you could see the arrow here, ACRD is asking that that move to the south to provide future connectivity for the remaining parcel that will probably plat as single family residential. One thing -- I think staff laid it out pretty well in the staff report, but one thing to just point out from our -- from our analysis and when we were looking at this, a couple things are in conflict with what ACHD is proposing or recommending with that change. First requirement is if it's