Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplicant Response to Staff Report 9-22-09September 21, 2009 R,]Rcp,TvP,D SEP 2 2 2009 CITY OF Ciie; INJ­ CITY CLERKS OFFICE City of Meridian Planning Department Attn: Sonya Watters 33 E. Broadway Ave, Suite 210 Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Treasure Valley Veterinary Hospital — Response to Staff Report (CC 9-22-09) Dear Ms. Watters, We are in receipt of the Treasure Valley Veterinary Hospital staff report for the City Council Hearing scheduled for September 22, 2009, and have a few comments and clarifications that we would like to note. The applicant concurs with the conditions of approval identified within Exhibit B of the Staff Report with exception of the following Items: Cross Access Easement to North — The applicant's attorney has prepared proposed modified language to replace Section 1.2.g. in the staff report regarding the cross - access easement: g. Subject to the conditions in this paragraph, a cross -access easement shall be recorded that provides driveway access to the property to the north (parcel #R9071450022) (the "Northern Parcel") for connectivity. Applicant shall have no obligation to record the easement unless the owner of the Northern Parcel grants a reciprocal cross -access easement to the applicant. The applicant shall have no obligation to improve the easement or to maintain it if it is improved. The initial location of the easement shall be as set forth in Exhibit " " hereto. However, the easement is being granted prior to the development of the applicant's property. Therefore, the applicant shall have the right to relocate the easement upon the applicant's property either before or after the development of the applicant's property, upon thirty days' prior written notice to the owner of the Northern Parcel. Applicant then shall execute, deliver and record a superseding easement to evidence the relocation. 2. Variance Request — It's our opinion that staff's findings warrant further discussion and that the findings required to approve the variance can be reached by Council. The Idaho Transportation Department has reviewed and approved the proposed existing deeded access configuration for the addition/remodel project. The following comments were provided by ITD: "We understand the applicant's request for variance is based on the fact that the current proposed changes would be to the existing veterinary office. We have no objection to the continued use of the existing access points for the expansion of the 9543 W. Emerald Street, Suite 102 Boise, Idaho 83704 T.208.846.8955, F.208.846.8956 veterinary offices. However, once further development on the site occurs, all access should be redirected to Edmonds Court." The Ada County Highway District did not comment on the proposed access configuration or site improvements. ACHD noted that: "The District has no comment on the site improvements at this time due to the fact that it is not a change in use." ...and that "With future development applications, ACHD will review the potential to relocate site access from SH -69 to Edmonds Court. " A. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district. It's important to re-emphasize that the applicant's request is for continued temporary use of their existing deeded right of access to two existing access points to Highway 69. We are not requesting a new entitlement, special right or privilege to permanently utilize the existing access points. This variance request is not for permanent site access. This finding could not be reached by staff due to the "increase of intensity of use" proposed with the building addition associated with this application. Specifically, the "increase of intensity of use" is to add 1,504 sq. ft. to the existing 2,112 sq. ft. hospital facility. To provide a scaled perspective of the proposed addition project in comparison to the total site, note that once fully developed the site could support approximately 19,000 sq. ft of office space and appurtenant site features. Thus, the existing 2,112 sq. ft. hospital accounts for 11.11% of the total build out square footage; and the proposed 1,504 sq. ft. addition accounts for 7.92% of the total build out square footage. The point being is that 80.97% of the total site building square footage site remains to be developed. It's our position that since the Treasure Valley Veterinary Hospital has the existing right and privilege to utilize the two subject deeded points of access, and that a variance approval that incorporates a temporary access provision would actually be a limitation on the existing right and privilege of use. Thus, the variance approval would not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district. B. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site. Staff was able to make this finding. Additional support was provided by the applicant as within the LOI of August 19, 2009 as submitted with the Variance Request Application. Since submittal of the project applications, the applicant has worked with Anderson Construction Company, Inc. to assess project costs. Based on Anderson's estimate, costs associated with construction of the access road to Edmonds Court, a cul-de-sac turn around constructed to fire department standards and appurtenant roadway and drainage improvements would cost $96,457.00. The estimated cost of these improvements is completely disproportionate to the overall scale, scope and intent of the proposed addition remodel project. C. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. Staff's findings indicated that approval of the variance could be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare due to increased traffic as result of the increased facility square footage. Crash data was provided by ITD District 3 as indicated in 9543 W. Emerald Street, Suite 102 Boise, Idaho 83704 T.208.846.8955, F.208.846.8956 the LOI submitted with the variance application. Based on review of the crash data there does not appear to be evidence to support a history of crashes related to turning movements at or within close proximity to the existing hospital. Thus, the existing/proposed access configuration has serviced the Treasure Valley Veterinary hospital without crash history for approximately twelve years. It's important to note that sight distance, access alignment and access spacing are key components to approach safety. The two subject approaches align to Highway 69 at right angles, which is the safest type of intersection; they have sufficient sight distance; and are spaced a minimum of 548 feet from W. Maestra St. and 1760 feet from W. Calderwood St. on the west side of the highway that could cause conflicting turning movements. The aforementioned attributes are all positives when considering approach safety for the proposed access configuration. It's our opinion that Treasure Valley Veterinary Hospital addition project, with continued utilization of the two existing accesses, will not cause an increased detriment to the public health, safety or welfare. Please feel free to contact me at (208) 867-3954 or email me at ross(o-),ericksoncivil.com if you should have any questions or require any additional information. Sincerely, ERICKSON CIVIL, INC. Rossi Erickson; P.E. Attch: Graphic 1 - Existing Access Points along HWY 69 near the Treasure Valley Veterinary Hospital Graphic 2 - Treasure Valley Veterinary Hospital - Views from Existing Site Approaches 9543 W. Emerald Street, Suite 102 Boise, Idaho 83704 T.208.846.8955, F.208.846.8956 W. Calderwood St. NO TH CO 3 0 250' 500' _ Existing Access Points along HWY 69 near the Treasure Valley Veterinary Hospital Rosa�yh Ct EO I— Treasure Valley _ Veterinary Hospital Edmonds Ct. EO It LO W. Maestra St. D D cn z ° o ;:I_� zr CD CD f D D O 0 nT n 0 O ! z z O O '. CD ��Yi/�� V) CD D D C Z 0 < (D CD CD zr0 i CD v o m x -11 0 v cQ CDr D O (n 0