Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Summerfield Subdivision AZ PP TE FP
OFFICIALS WAYNE s'. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208)888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLEq MAX YERRINGTON ROSERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY DF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meri~d+ia Planning and Zonin Commission, may we have your answer by: M~' P ! /~r11 I ~ t e v~ n ~ . ~ Q ~'7R. t / ~ ~ww.... _~ _ TRANSMITTAL DATE: ~e~Y1 ~ ~~ {Q~~a HEARING DATE: TtAy1p~! «~y RE[ BY: L.uurH I 1 UMN OF PROP(E~ RT.'rY t3R PROJECTt : ^`~j ~ , L{.~, ~ ~~;,~.- ,'~,~~ u~~' JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFDRD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, CJC BOB GIESLER, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENt MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE tPREL.& FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO. [PREL. & FINAL PLAT) U. S. WEST [PREL. 8 FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS [PREL. & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION tPREL. B FINAL PLAT) WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER CITY ATTORNEY CITY FILES OTHER• GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER /V 'N\ \v _~~ RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. s~,~.:~o ~-~ 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 May 19, 1993 Mr. Wayne Forrey City Clerk City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Street Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Proposed G. L. Voigt Annexation Request and Summerfield Subdivision Preliminary Plat Dear Mr. Forrey: 208/322-8992 ^ Fax 208/378-0329 ~~~~Y~~~ MAY191993 Cl~ ®F MERIDIAN The annexation and preliminary plat applications for the G. L. Voigt Summerfield Subdivision preliminary plat contain property that is currently located outside of the City of Meridian's urban service boundary, approximately the northerly 331 feet of the subject property. It is the intention of the applicant to have the said northerly 331 feet annexed into the urban service planning area. However, we understand that a modification to the urban service planning boundary will require a longer approval time period than annexation and preliminary plat applications. Therefore, we hereby request that the annexation and preliminary plat applications move forward now for consideration of approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of the subject property that is currently located within the urban service boundary. I have attached a revised description which excludes the parcel that is located outside of the urban service boundary. Thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, • I .~ I .~-~--. Daniel A. Torun Project Manage Enclosure DAT/bh/245.Itr /G 'N\ ~9_ ~/ RV RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 May 13, 1993 Mr. Wayne Forrey, City Clerk City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Street Boise, ID 83642 RE: Proposed G. L. Voigt Annexation and Preliminary Plat Dear Mr. Forrey: 208/322-8992. ^ Fax 208/378-0329 The attached applications contain requests by G.L. Voigt for approval of annexation of approximately 70 acres at the Northeast corner of Locust Grove and Ustick Roads and approval of a preliminary plat which contains 200 single family lots. The proposed Summerfield Subdivision will contain public streets that will be constructed in accordance with the Ada County Highway District standards. New sanitary sewer and water main lines will be extended to serve this project. All lots within this subdivision will contain 8,000 square feet with the majority of the lots being larger than 8,000 square feet. Thank you for your time and consideration if you have any questions, please give me a call. incerely, ~~ U' Da iel A. T rfir Projec t Man g DAT/bh/237.Itr r x .Y •ab D~ P ,± ~ ~ ~ . I: • • .~ Fae Corr REAUEST FUR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: A r•eque~t far preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P. M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision, J(/IYYIYYIF 2~1~1.~•C7 2. General Location, S~C=i fOi•-~ 32, 'r: 4.~. '~, ~ ~ g,~p ~,~,4 Gt~y~t~y 3. Owners of record, ~ II s E~ ztrrl~-r, ~.t~ Lt s T° Address, _2ip Telephone 9. Applicant,~_~dlGr'T Address, ~0.~ 20'}~ IDAt'~~~, ID ~Z~o3 5. Engineer, ~, .AOti1 .{-~u,~h(,,~ Firm UC __ . , Address ~ ~ _ . Zip~3~`1 Telephone 322~~°~,g2 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name Address Telephone--6000 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres C ~ 2. Number of lots 2~ LI.~I(,p~N(~- ~-G 3. Lots per acre 3.0 /~~ 9. Density per acre ~ . U f 5. Zoning Classification ~ e ) •+y ~Qt~t,~5'~~~T ~," `~ . ..~ •• ~ ''` ' ;• f • • 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside the tleridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification_ 2.T 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt -`!O 8. Have recreational easements been provided for N J 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City~--1c7 Explain 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas?_ ~ Ems, Explain Fh.1'rfL.t~n__hr.G_ ~.I~Ih~r~A~.Q~ ~ ~~n~ For future parks? r10 Explain ~- 11. MY,at school t s ) service the area rh ~~ ,`r~ r ti ,,,e do you propose any agreements for future school sites ~ t) Explain ~ 12. Other proposed amenities to the City ~ Mater Supply ~- Fire Department ~Cl,l~ll'~Gl,{~~( ~~1~vi Other _ Explain 13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination ) ~ ~ tr~ey,ina'- 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single Family, Duplexes, tlultiplexes, other ~I~ ~,~„r~ ~ „~ 15. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot t s) . -~bb~ S[5 ,/ ~(~ ,~ Cod` b. J9inimum square footage of structure t s ) l~J c7C~ c. Are garages provides for, square footage d. Are other coverings provided for ~ C7 e. Landscaping has been provided for ~ Describe t2) ~it:..s f'.:: ~, -sr '~'._~. ...~. _- ~:+' ".'°_ ~I~av:n.35jpilY.04 ' •~, •. , « 1• . • ¢ ~ ~ • , • f. Trees will be provided for / ,_, Trees will be maintained ~ ' g. Sprinkler systems ire provided for __ A lr~ h. Are there multiple units s _ Type_ remarks_ i(T) ~ VJ ~ ~ ` ~ ~~ i. Are there special set back requirements ~ d . Explain ~. Has off street parking been provided for ~O .Explain __. _ - k. Value ran a of - - ---- 3 property_ ~~~~ bd (~ - ~ ~ f°1~, ~~- -- r- l. Type of financing far development S'rQ,W]~I,~MQ m. Protective covenants rere submitted .Date 16. Does the proposal land lock other property. 1~1'(~ Does it create Enclaves ~~ • STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets. curbs, gutters and sideralks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Pleridisn Ordinance. Dimensions rill be determined b~y- the City Engineer. All sideralks rill be five t5) feet in ridth. 2. Proposed use is in conformance Comprehensive Plan. rich the City of tleridian 3. Development rill connect to City services. 4. Development will comply with City Ordinances. ~. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. 6. Street names must not conflict rich City grid system. t3) t ° ~ , ~~ L AUG-11-199.'.' 1 ~ ~ 33 FROM C I Tl' OF MERIDIAN TO 3?803~9 P . 02 . .. _ ~ ~ ~ ~o~ , oa APPLIATION FOA ANNEXATION APPROVAL & ZONING OR REZONE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION I. GirNERAL INFORMATION FILING INFORMATION (PROPOSED NAI~~E OF UBDIVISYON} (GENER LOCATION (LEGAL DESL~I~IPTION - IF LENGTHY) .~_ (OWNER{S) 0~' RECORD} {NAME] ('PELEPHONE NO.} (ADDRESS) . v- v ~ ~ (A PLICANTj (NAME} (TEL PHONE N0.) o G~-o~c 20 ~~ l r ~a ~ 0 b~~ (ADDRESS} b ~.. - - 2. (ENGINEER, SV EYQx O PLANNER) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.) (ADDRLSSj {JUAISDICTION(Sj gE~QUIRING AppROVAL) (TYPE OF SUBDIVISION ~ RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL) +so ACRES of LAND iN coNTlauovs OWNERSHIP. (ACCEPTED BY:) (FEE) ' • . R~.Lo rum r>~v~ ~S SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION Raymond Ante 3610 N. Locust Grove Meridian, ID 83642 Ustick 40 Partnership 2820 E. Ustick Meridian, ID 83642 Vienna Vaughn, Trustee 2180 E. Ustick Meridian, ID 83642 ~ ~ a /V 'N\ ~~_ ~~ RV HOBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 Project No. 93050 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR G. L. VOIGT, LOCUST GROVE SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION May 12, 1993 The South half of the South hall of the NWi/4 of the SW1/4; and the SW1/4 of the SW1/4; and and portion of the West half of the SE1/4 of the SW1/4, all in Section 32, T.4N., R.1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the corner common to Sections 31 and 32, T.4N., R.1 E., and Sections 5 and 6, T.3N., R.1 E., B.M.; thence North 00°00'08" West, 1661.81 feet to a 1/256 corner; from which the quarter corner common to said Sections 31 and 32 bears North 00°00'08" West, 997.19 feet; thence South 89°49'45" West, 1327.33 feet to a 1/256 corner; thence South 00°01'12" East, 331.83 feet to a 5/8" iron pin marking the SW1/16 corner; thence North 89°49'16" East, 663.49 feet to a 5/8" iron pin marking the C-E-SWi/64 corner; thence South 00°01'36" East along the East boundary of the West half of the SE1/4 of the SW1/4, 1031.32 feet to a point; thence South 89°43'17" West, 200.00 feet to a point; thence South 00°01'36" East, 295.00 feet to a point on the South boundary of said Section 32; thence South 89°43'17" West, 1791.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 69.47 acres, subject to road rights-of-way along the South and West boundary. Prepared By: RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. DTP/bh/527.des D. Terry Peugh, L.S. 208/322-8992 ^ Fax 208/378-0329 ~ • I •~ ~ . I ~~ ED SUmrr1E(t,~c~l-D Sc.18D1d151Q 0~ ,~ _tti ~ ~~ L~ l ~ ^ ~ • ~ l~d~ C ~~ Q ~.' s - -ao-~s6 - --_ ,- ~~lb ' SLCavGN i ~r ~ r St/BL 47ERAL f: r > 3 I !~ w CA O ., n ~. r• z ~. SU DIVI I :~ ~4. ~y ~ ~. :: ~+ NO 2 m ~ ~. e ~ ~c L[5 E 1 n U a C ~ ? .. N 'j ~e ?~ ~i u n a . • PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300' OF SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION Raymond Ante 3610 N. Locust Grove Meridian, ID 83642 Ustick 40 Partnership 2820 E. Ustick Meridian, ID 83642 Vienna Vaughn, Trustee 2180 E. Ustick Meridian, ID 83642 June Huskey _ c/o James Hollister 9888 Edna Boise, ID 83704 Tom Davis 2740 E. Ustick Meridian, ID 83642 Leon Johnson 1570 E. Ustick Meridian, ID 83642 Herbert Dalrymple 3539 N. Locust Grove Meridian, ID 83642 Alfred Gibbons 3545 N. Locust Grove Meridian, ID 83642 Herbert Lee 3665 N. Locust Grove Meridian, ID 83642 Michael Donahue 3775 N. Locust Grove Meridian, ID 83642 1 <, r. Eugene Quenzer 3680 N. Black Cat Road Meridian, ID 83642 E. E. Brinegar 1639 Conant Burley, ID 83318 Robert Minton 2035 E. Ustick Meridian, ID 83642 Cleah Cooper c/o Vern Alleman 2101 E. Ustick Meridian, ID 83642 V. L. Holladay 2315 E. Ustick Meridian, ID 83642 Craig Lacy 11458 Alejandro Boise, ID 83709 Vern Alleman 2101 E. Ustick Meridian, ID 83642 Phillip Kotschwar P.O. Box 190 Middleton, ID 83644 • 4' • ~ • 7 .• March 27, 1993 Mr. Cris Williams Commercial Real Estate Companies 3350 Americana Terrace, Suite 200 Boise, ID 83706 Dear Cris: This offer is delivered to you by Gary Voigt or Nominee ("Buyer"), regarding certain property located in Section 32, Township 4 North, Range I East known as the Ustick 40 Site, Domed by The Ustick 40 Partnership ("Seller"). The offer will supersede all previous offers between the parties. The property contains approximately 40 acres, more or less. The Buyer proposes to purchase aforementioned property. This letter is intended to be a binding instrument and reflects the transaction the Buyer is willing to undertake subject to certain conditions and contingencies detailed herein. Following are the basic terms of this offer: Purchase Price. The total purchase price for the property is Six-Hundred Forty Thousand and NO/100 ($640,000.00)dollars. 2. Earnest ltilonev Deposit Upon acceptance Buyer will issue anon-refundable check to the seller, made payable to the "Ustick 40 Partnership", evidencing the good faith and intention of the Buyer. The non-refundable earnest money of 9;20,000 wil! be paid over 6 months in the amount of $3334 per month. All earnest money to be applied at closing. 3. Terms of Purchase Buyer to pay $640,000.00 cash at closing including all earnest money deposits. 4. Property Description Description of the "Ustick 40" Site to be attached as Exhibit A. Review eriod or Buyer• There shall be no review period prior to the initiation of this agreement. Seller will cooperate in any applications to governmental agencies. If at any time prior to September 27, 1993, buyer determines the property is not developable, Sellers sole and exclusive remedy against Buyer,witl be limited to the non-refundable earnest money received by the Seller. ;' `~~~- ~;~~ j~ ~~~~ Park P~o~nte REALTY, Inc. P. ~• Brrc 8082 + Braise. hlah~ t3;iQ; • X2081 l21-~62 ' • ~ ' • a ~+ Page Z March 27, 199; titr. Cris Williams 6. ~-dditiunal_Terms.~Conditions nnd/c~r_Contin~encies_ 1) Williams and Ellis will provide an ALTA Insurance Policy issued to the entity of the Buyer's clwice at closing with Preliminary Title Report to be sent to Buyer within thirty (30) days from execution of this agreement. We assume that title is Free and Clear with no extraordinary title exceptions. 7, to in ~. The closing shall occur within ten days of final plat recording or September 37. 1993, whichever is Later, at the offices of First American Title Company, Boise, Idaho. Title will be transferred by Warranty Deed. Taxes and irrigation assessments shall be pro-rated at closing. All normal closing costs, including preparation of documents, shall be shared equally between the parties except for Title lnsurance which shalt be the Seller's responsibility. Each party shat! be responsible for their own legal andlor tax counsel. S. Extension of Closing. Should Buyer need more time to complete the development application, Seiler shall agree to extend closing for up to six months upon receipt of additional non-refundable earnest money of Thrity-Thousand and NO/100 030,000) dollars. 9. Brokerage Fee. Seller acknowledges that the agent working with the Buyer represented the Buver and the agent working with the Seller represented the Seller. The agent representing the Buyer will be compensated by the Listing Broker as per agreement. IU. Acceptance by Seller. This offer will become null and void if not accepted by Seller prior to midnight Saturday, March ~7, 1993. The Seller hereby agrees to the terms and conditions of this offer by executing this letter as indicated below and returning the same to the Buyer. Sincerely yours, ~C~~------_ R. Craig Groves Associate Broker Accepted by: "Buver" Gary Voigt .~ Dated: - ~ .t -~ _ ~ 3 "Seller" Ustick ~0 Partnership By: _ Dated: ~. • ADUENUUM TU AGREEMENT March 29, 1993 't'his is an Addendum to the Agreement dated March 27, 1993, between Gary Voigt {"Buyer") and Ustick 40 Partnership ("Seller"). (All references to Williams and Ellis in the above referred agreement shall refer to Ustick 4U Partnership.) 2. The $3,354.00 per month earnest money will be paid directly ~ to Ustick 40 Partnership and will be due the 3ist of each month. If payment is not received by the due date, this agreement will become null and void and Buyer forfeits all • monies paid. . 7. 1 in The closing shall occur, on or before Oc.+obev~ f, 1993, at the offices of First American Title Company, Boise, Idaho. The Seller has the option to perform a 1031 Tax Free E ~#~ e~. Thus, if Buyer desires to close prior to the scheduled 1993, closing date, the Seller requires a sixty (60) day written notification prior to closing in order to provide adequate time to identify an exchange property. 8. extension of CloSinQ• There will be no extension of closing after September 27, 1993. If closing is not performed by this date all earnest money will be forfeited. 9. The commission will be split 60/40 between the listing {60°k) and selling (40%) broker. 10. ,ACCEPTANCE OF ADDENDUM BY BUYER This offer will become null and void if not accepted by Buyer prior to midnight Tuesday, March 30, 1993. • !: ~ ... f • - ! • The numerical sequence of this addendum to the original offer dated March 27, 1993, is intended.. to modify and change the original offer to an offer acceptable to the Seller. In the event of any conflict between the original offer and addendum, the addendum will control. Accepted by: "Buyer" -Gary Voigt By: , ~_~~ l/ Dated: ~ -~,~ - ~_ "Seller" Ustick 40 Partnership By: Date .3 2 ~ j ~+ ~ _ ,~- /V 'N\ ~~_ ~~ • RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. • 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 May 11, 1993 Mr. Wayne Forrey City Clerk. _ miry of Pvleridian 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, ID 83642 RE: G. L. Voigt Annexation /Preliminary Plat Dear Mr. Forrey: 208/322-8992 ^ Fax 208/378-0329 I hereby grant my permission to G. L. Voigt to submit a request for the annexation of my property, located in Section 32, T.4N., R.1 E., B.M., reference the attached description Exhibit A. ~ ~~ Acknowledgement State of IdahG ) ss County of Ada ) On this ,~2~ day of ~ _, 1993 personally appeared R ,~~ ~, known or identified to me to a the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and who acknowledged to me that he executed the same. Notary ublic for Idaho Residing in Boise, Idaho. My bond expires ~ z y- /226.Itr ~ ~ o' C / 1 REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT. (CONTINUED) "'~' 15. RISK OF LOSS. Should the Property be materially damaged by fire or other cause prior to closing, unless Buyer has taken possession prior to closing vT_ Agreement, this agreement shaft he voidable at the option o1 the Buyer. M 16. CONDITION OF PROPERTY AT CLOSING. Buyer agrees to purchase the Properly in as is condition, where is, with all faults. Buyer will assume alt oblige- gg ~ tions with respect to the Property. 5elter shalt maintain the property until the closing in its present condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, and loss by 90 casualty. The heating, ventilating, alr canditioning, plumbing, elevators, loading doors and electrical systems shah ITe in present operating order and condition gi o at the time of closing, unless otherwise agreed to in writing. O 17. INSPECTION. The B er here acknowled es further that B g2 ~ ~ 9 uyer has not received or relied upon any statements or representations by the Broker or Broker's g3 representatives or by the Seller which are not herein expressed. The Buyer has entered into this a reement rei n u ~ from Buyer's own Irwesligation or personal inspection of the premises. g Yt 9 Pon iMormation end knowledge obtained gq (_] 18. ADDITIONAL PROV1310NS. Additional provisions of this Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement, ii any, are attached hereto by an addendum consisting g8 of ~ pages. 19. AGENCY DISCLOSURE. At the time of signing this agreement the agent working with the Buyer represented ~Qi~(s`__ ~ and the agent working with the Seller represented S t3 t.t_e 2- g8 written dtsclosure of agency was provided to them in this transaction. Each party to this transaction has head and unlderstandsothe ontentsiori fhe at enior gg disclosure brochure previously received. g cY t00 Listing Agency: _ ~ArLK. PoiN'f-e. ~/~T-y ~~~ 101 t Selling Agency: Pi~.tt._I~ '~d r! N~' ~. i?eA~'ty ~'~Ili~ 102 By: R•c.rLAi~, C-,auyec rele~z3-oo~2 By:~R•C~t..~Q G,~o~~S Tale 3Z3-006 Z 103 20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This agreement, including any addendums or exhibib, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and no warranties, in- 104 ciuding any warranty of habitability, agreements or representations have been made or shall be binding upon either party unless herein set forth. 21. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE IN THIS AGREEMENT. 105 THtS IS A LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENT. IF NOT UNDERSTOOD BUYER AND SELLER ARE ADVISED TO SEEK THE AOVIGE OF COMPETENT LEGAL 107 COUNSEL. _ " 108 Buyer: Buyer's Address -/- Q d~l~ ~`S. L Si3 `fi't »n Buver: Seller ~/ `"fsr•.d,..,rF~ /// ~~~~~ Setter: Buyer's Telephone Seller's Address 3610 N Lp~~g-~- G2o/~S -r-'~c tt.•ito i~-rs I ~'.t(~ 3 6 t-i'Z, selrera relepno~re 889 -,~S' 7S ADDENDUM 111 112 113 114 I B £, - -{~ B.m c.o dKe N ~ N _ f 2e -~ t:~lnl©a b l•e. '>*-e.t'L 2e na o v AZ_ 115 ~ ~ fki-t- IJ ~ t IJG n~ C' f P S ~' /V ~-i-'E' (Nl # (~ its m _cT.. 118 ~ ~ .. COMME CIAI./IESTMENT REAL ESTATC~ r~ PUF~IASE AND SALE AGREEMEN~ REAIiOR® M'~ It i 0 • Idaho ~ ^ ~ o_ 19 q3 1 1. BUYER. G.L.. Vo ~ a ~' O~v e top-xeu ~j.~T.~nt,v Aa1 [~ ~o_ rt /4~Sf~nt S 2 ~ 3 ~ (hereinafter called "Buyer") agrees to purchase, and the undersigned Seller agrees to sell the following described rest estate hereinafter refEmed to as "premises" 4 ~ 2. PROPERTY ADDRESS AND LEGAL DESCRtPT10N. The property commonly known as 3610 lJ. ~...~ ~i,,,SZ _[~ Q ~ y e- 5 ® 8 ~ City of ~E (~~ 01 ~~ Counry of ~~,A Idaho le ally described as: ~ ~a~- ~~"'~' 7 5 ,rz ~ -F- -li.o N W ~~ ~-~ ~ e S W %~f o {~ ~c c 3 Z , ~-~ N ~-1~ 1 ~ S Y~ .e ~ Buyer and Seller authorize Agent or Closing Agency to insert and/or correct, ove~r,t.h~ei~r signatures, the legal description of the properl as provded by Sallee 9 0 3. PRICE/TERMS. Total Purchase Price is 6 N F ~ lAAti7 S?.E d S e V~~ - Fi JQ. 'f'~''b GSq ay /~ N~ t p e ~-' 10 Dollars ($ 17 S. 000'' ), 11 a) $ 1 "7' S r OOD Cash down payment, Including Earnest Money deposit. 12 b) $ Balance of the purchase price to be paid as follows: 13 14 15 i6 17 18 19 4. EARNEST MONEY. 20 a) Buyer hereby deposits as earnest money and a receipt is hereby acknowledged of T O ~~I~10 t~.SA~ N ~ 21 Dollars ($ .Zy. O t~ O . ~ o ). 22 Evidenced by: ^ Cash ~( Check ^ Cashiers check ^ Note or 23 b) Earnest Money to be deposited in trust account upon acceptance by alt parties and shall be held by ~Q cL~ ~~ e- Rtm~~ 24 ~~ ~ • for the benefit of the parties hereto. 25 5. INCLUDED ITEMS. Ali attached floor coverings, attached television antenna, attached plumbing, bathroom and HgMing fixtures, window screens, screen 26 doors, storm windows, storm doors, window coverings, exterior trees, plants, shrubbery, water heating apparatus end fixtures, aiached fireplace equipment, 27 awnings, ventilating, coaling and heating systems, built-in and "drop-in" ranges (but excepting alt other ranges), fuel tanks and irrigation fixtures and equip- 28 ment, all water and water rights, aB ditches and ditch rights that are appurtenant thereto that are now on or used in connection with the premises shall be 29 included in the sale unless othennrise provided herein. 30 Other items specifically included in this eels: N ~~• 31 Items specifically excluded in this sale: tU ~~ 32 33 8. ADDITIONAL TERMS, CONDITIONS AND/OR CONTINGENCIES. The closing of this transaction is contingent upon written satisfaction or waiver of the 34 following conditions: 35 Buyer will have until ''~/ 3 Q/ 9 3 _._ 7z .TtILE.~OMP_ANY/C~OS1NCi AGENCY. a) The parties agree that Fi_L~Sr 36 37 38 39 40 41 to satisfy or waive ail conditions and/or contingencies. 42 `C_A-._~________._,_____~ Title Company 43 (GJ AtJN e~A-ria nt "to 't-Itie. Si~i'V D -F VII. e 2 t o r q~ N ~, ~-nl 0 V~ R7 -f : c a 'ri o rl O f ~. ~ ~t.s a rL 14n1.0 __IJ~A;•k-eQ.. -~-0 b~.. BJ~r"ftN,DTfO '~ Loc4-ST G~20J~ ~4Nb (~lSTick h,~tp ~G ~eWeR_ ~nAci'1T^)/ -11'a SQ2U'r c ~ Su~b~ ec 'f' P!t-op~2"Fy 11HT l~-y3 rxl 15;26 • FAX N0, 3032701279 P, 02 • •~ ~ ~ ~ ~. • ~,`~ ~NQIryF~N I~U~BLE ENGINEERING, ING. ~.y ~~ 9560 Bethel Gourt,^ Boise, Idaho 83709 208/32a~8992 • Fax 208!378-0329 . O SURV~~~ •- May 11, 1893 .. •• Mr. Wayne,Fprrey' ~ ~ . . City Clerk City of Meridian ~ • • 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Q. L. Voigt Annexation /Preliminary Ptat . . Dear Mr. Forrey: • .. I hereby grant my permission to G, L. Voigt to submit a request for the.annexation of my property, located in Section 32, T.4N. ~ R.1 E., R.M., reference the attached description Exhibit A. Acknowledgement ~ .. ~ ••'r ~ ~ , State of Cou~+,oa ) • ~ ~ ' ~) ss . • County e1~A,da ~VC~ ) . ~.. .. 0 this ~ • day ©f ~ • ~ 1993 personally appeared . ~~ 1t~-tA~. wA Ate nl and ~ ~ known or identified to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and who acknowiedc~ed to me that he executed the same. ~ - _ _ • . - ;~.: ' f~(~tary PWblic ~eCq~ne~o .. .. .. . _ .. ~ ~~= 'r.:~'R~i~it~~in ~`kxo. My bond expires _ I G _q to • ... ... .. .. . R=96°4 140 FATCO I.F. May ~, 1g93 • ~P.2i6 r Mr . 91.11 V$ugh 1y69$ Cassia Tree Dane zrvin®, CA 927,5 ~tE: Approximately 19+J.. Bare ACres on Ustick Road D~talr' F1.1 i 1 i qtr. Gmxy 'Voigt agxees to purchase i9+/ ~ scrag located in thca West 1J2, of the SE 1/a, of ells SW 1/a, or SRCtlon 32 Township aN, Range 1E o~ the BM. zt 3s understood tha property 3,s approxinately 19 bare acres a»d a gorfial legal dsscrip~tion will be a~tCaahed ag ~xhibfC nA". 1. ~ The purchase price shall be FYFTEEN Tt1UUSArrp DDGLARS AND pc/Loo (S15,AO0.0a) p~sr developabl~a acre of land. The buyer will not be puxch8siny any prop®rty 3,n Ghe Ustic~k goad Right vP WaY. 2. ~. All Dash aC c:lvsing 1. mew ~'eriod. (A) Immt~digtely upon e~rc:eptanVP, the Vaugti Estate shall de1l,vpr to Gary Voigt o»e (1) eul.L sPt of ducum~nts li.gtr~d in Exhl.bit "H" . Tho buyer shall have 9d days Lrvm s®11exs aeceptance (rr~view petivd} during which to rc~v3.ew the documents anti make detailed phyaiCAl 3.nspectlons df the prope~y. A~Cter the date of dGCeptanCe at this letter o~ intent the employees, AgAnts or c:onsulCants for Gary Voigt, shall b+~ clranted a rigirat o~ ~ntx-y to Cbo •- properties to ~.nspe4t thm physical conditi,an thereof and Cv pexform studies and tests. ` (b) The buyers approval of trio documents arld the property i.s a condition of''his ab.ti,~xations herevr~der and iF approve~rl Snail be evidenced by 8 written noCicd sielned by .the t~uypr a»d' deZiv~red to the s~e~llar at the r_onelusian of the r~view.,p+ariod. Zrt the event tha buyor disa~ppxoves any dc~cnmerit or any poxt3on of the property or determines that tha purchase is not. ecanomirally tea6ible Chia .' ar~reement shall b+9coni~r null and voir~ and the F,sr_rna Depo~s}.t dsacrik+ed below shall k~e immediately retuxned to the buyer. P~r1~ Pairr~~ ~•~ ~~- ~'~T~~-rY ~~~~ 208 529 8965 05-06=J3 •~~~I •-'~M- F002 I ~. .i #! 2 8 '} May 5, 1993 Mr. sill Vaagh >?t"rga Too • P. 3i6 4. ,Qt~,er _t~at~e~_ ~#]~ cc~nc]ik~n~ (A) Annr~fcation te+ tha City r,f M®rldie~r~ by 3eptemb~r a0, x993. (q) Clean enviranmentl~t. review assassmant. 5- p.~finit v~„tiurchaar~,..~~gr+~e Thi$ ].etttst' in a binding C4ntxaCt subleCt to trie terms and conditions hereof and to then prepazat:ion of the pefihi>r$ve' puXChase Agreement "©.P.A" cdntaining terms mutually eeeeptabla td the palrtieas as follows: (A) On oz before August 31., 1993, the parties shall, execute 8t D.P.A. !,n a mutually acoaptable form consistent with the texsns and pzavasiors hereof. This agreelgent shall be merged irCe~ and supersad~+~t by suety 19gEinitivs Purchag~s Agxe®fient:. (B) TCsttig Groves nd sh 11 be delivere~3s~d all pa ti®>~ an or bd:~ore August a5, 1993. 6. ~t„~*'nt.~ D+~tl'o5'J~t. trv buyer c+il1 Upon execsutio>n df this Latter o~ intrnt, delf.ver a check ~1ade payable to Park Pointe Realty, xnc. , Trust Acpo~int .i.n tfie amount c+~ $7, 500. v0 to evidence *_t1j good Ea3ith And intention of rrie buyl~x tv close trle trans~-ctiosl. 't!he EsGroW Deposit wi 1 a only be de~+os ite-.~, upon acceptanoe o f Chi:S Agreemt~nt by the seller . Upon cc~~ep 1. e t f on o P the r~sviRw period, buy®x will de~tiver ap add~,tianal check oracle payable to t?ark Pointe RaalCy, Inc. , 'Crust AC<,nunl: in CNe amount of $i~, boa. oo For a totiai despcrsit of ~~u, X100. aa. ~~~e X20, ao0. o0 deposit wiXl be released to the vaugh Pstate upon removal of all oont i.tngena i.es . ~ . ~.s i~xla . . Clan ing of, than pus~chzia~! shall ncfiur at th+a of ~ice~ of First - Atn~irican Title on or before Marsh 31, 3994 or at sut±h other time as the paxties~°sh~.l3. tltutual.ly agrwe. Alt not'mal closi.t,g costs shall be shar~sd by the pa~rCie~s on a ~UJSO basis excepr Che cash o~C Oevndr's • Tit19 In:attrance which s halt, bt3 the re:apons~,bi.lity o~ tht3 s~111er. Each party shall be rr3~p+~ns~ibls for thei>" own expenlae of legal and/vr tax ca+:nril• Taxes, irrigation aa~esatnents, etC•, eha11 be prorated between the .'paxC.ies at alo>3ing. T3,e brvk®t'age caompanies lnv4lved itt Vaigt-Davie Realtors and PArk Pointe this transaction al~+3 Realty, Ync., both I ., I ~. •t 'i . i ~. R=96% 208 529 8965 05-06-93 11:43AM P003 #28 • ~ 41 FATCQ I, ;~ , _ May 5, 199J N[r . H.~.1 ~. vaulgh t-ayga Three •~ ... P.4i6 , representing the buyex. A Vrnkerage Eae wiZ1 ba pc~i.d by'the seLlerr at Clasiriq oi' r~~lrrow in the tlmount uL' 'JE'Eht gERCLAtT (10~). et the final sa~,s~s price. g . ~~Ka Z'h~.s agre+~me>nt is being ~t~.gnera by Gary Voigt fxrsti a:tc~ must be a~cepxed by the V>~+•tqh Esttt tg an b1r b~+#are ~ : 09 p • M • MhT, May 1a, 1993. ff not e~cvepted by May i2, L99~, buyer has Che ' option tia declare this agxc~e~mertt n+xll and vc,fd. The partfe~ he:'eby agree to Che terms and condiC~ons of ehf.ra after by ®xeeuti>7g this letter as Indira*ed be],ow. sincerely, • tt. Cr~~.g Gxoves AsA©ciate 8t`ok®r Acoeptad by: Gaky Voigt sy: ~'' Qat~ ~ - Vatigh EsCZttr3 Hy: Jyatad: - ~. .~ itCG : bl. l R°96~ 208 529 8965 05-06-93 11:43AM POOd #28 . . 1--.. h1~Y 06 ' 9~ i 1 ~ 41 FATCU I . ..• . P.5i6 ;~~ ' •. t t~ 1, A Boundary Survey wt11Ch can be use9d tq roi~hulate a dev~a3.o~rt~ent plan. 2. Copy oP real etgtat~ tax bills for 1992. ~, current commitment >*o>r title Insurance from First American Titi,e tt+gether •~-ith c4piea of all c~oc;ut~nts referxed to thsrei,n and al]. doduments q~.ving rise C© exeept~.ona t© title. a. A level one envirvnmantal assessment. 5. Copy of irr~.gation ~t~seessment notices. d. Copy aP any land lase arrangements. 7. Copy of a current apprai8al which may or may not be €or the pu~~hase pxice. R=96'6 20B 529 8965 05-06-93 I i : d 3/1M P005 #28~~~~ ,, r '~ ~~ w ~ ~ ,~.. n ~' ~ ~~ , ~~ .; ~' _ _ i r 4 _~ .'r 'Y ~ ~ ~ 1 :~ ~ u a; ~1 Ti~„, ~ DEED TO LIVle1G TROST _ Por va'.oa received+ VIENNA P. VAUGUN+ an unmarried woamn, _ ,` " -the 4ytAN?Oi.. ~ • '~, <~:. AOGBN+~TRUSTEEO OFE T+BB rVIENNA F~d VAUGBNn LIVItiG TROSTocreated ~ ~~ F. V .'4 '-£ by written peclaration o! Trust of February /~/+ 1991, whose ~ p ~ current address is 2180 ~etdesccibedoareal eprapertyl located 4la ~ ~- the GRANTEE+ the folleming a ~, ,','~' Meridian, Ada County. idahoi _ ~ ~~i The West 1/2 4f HortheaRange4l lEsstthBoisel/4Merid aotiin ` ,,~ 32+ Township "%. Adn County, Idaho, including the residenc++ situated thereon at 2180 East Ustick Road, Meridian, Idaho 83642. TO SAVE AUO TO pOLQ the premises and their appurtenances ~' _ unto the Grantou as Trustee, her successors and assigns "~ FORE1fER. GATED ~ !eb rue ry L y rl~._ + 19 91 . j ..;. .•J U ~z._ _ _ f , ~ "~.`~- w r t~ STATE OF IDAND ) P ) ss. g; ?~ County of Ada ) ~._. On this I~ day of February. 1991 + !~efore ~ red VtE°r ~+ F. said State, personally aPP bs.:ribed to ` ~,~_ y+ Public In am] for rson Mh04e namo is su VAUGHt7, kno.+n to me to tw the p~ x„~ ~ the [vre7olny instrument, end acknoale~lq~a t~+ m^ that she+ex~uted n same. ~ ~~,' i ~ fl. t _ ._..~~- • `,S; - ~U . fAah + / ~, i in I t r [ot .~l Uutse+ Idaho .. ~ .!: Ll. ~.,'- ~~ ~ i .;et~n rxplres~ 11/2/91 •~ .. ~~ '_ ~~ '1104392 E ~~'. RECORD :':~ i'iY~~2 `-~~ cw'-~- ~ ~' ~ ,~~.~, CEO ~ t ,11' x'.. ~ ~';+._,. '91 FE819 fl~ 1131 ~,~ ~ ~t~ 1~.72.fi f'n ~~ A r ' h _ ~ ~1(~~~ry T7 ~.1~~~ ~1 ~ T~Z~~T T'% ~ W 1 ~, R ..f Y °~ ~ i J .If r $ _ d~f .~x r~~ 1 ~Y ~ k '~ r ~ 1 dF~:Y '~M. J4 ~.'t ~ 4 '} fir; . h r ~, ~ ~ ~ „ ~ ~ ~~ F, i, ~ ~ r ~ ~~ s ~ ~ Yet ~ ~, ? f ~~ --b ~ ~. r~ti'.' . v_v .. C ', i~', Richard F. Goodson - ; , C 0 P Y i. Hartley Troxell Snnis i Healey ;~„ ~ ;+ ,, ~~~'~"~'~"` PLO. Bax 1611 8 ~,:,~~,k `~~r.:w.,,,~.....~. ,;: soise. Idaho:' 3701 ~ ~ ~; ~, ,~} ., ~` SEP 71h7G + . , Telephones t=08) 3~:-7683 ,.,' ..'~ q,A1tE~(ti yiRMrtM~. ClaiC Attorneys for Petitioneer ,,, SN~nur no+at» Oevw ry ~~ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL OISIR;CT OF TI:E ~, STATE OF IDAHO, 1N ANO FGR THE COUH?Y OF AD .- t. Iy TiIE MATTER OF THE ESTATE ; Caae No. 3P -45 ~`" ) pECREE VESTING ESTATE IN OF ) SURVIVINr.H'JSSAND ): ; ~~" MARIE R. AATE- i ~ . r i' +~~~I` ,s '~ ~ -mhe Petitian of Raymond V- Arte-.for af-Decree vrstin9 an ;q "~ ~ before the "' estate i:- him as a surviving husband having . Court fcr hearing. and the Court having heard•the"evidence and being fulJ~~ advised in the premises, the Court makes *he following Findings: t. ~ fi~ i t. ci.iy of April. ] 976, at ± Ftar.le R. Arta died un • Boise, Idaho. At the time ~ ,+~z ~i~~nth, an id decedent wee I ~ ' domiciled in Ada County. IciaLo. II. The decedent 1~ied in testate. III. ~- The 8eced©nt ie survived by the following heirs: Rolationship Address Name Husband 3610 N. Locust Grove Road Raymond V. Arto Moridion. :dn1~o B3G42 Daughtoz 3610 N. Ipldaho r83b42oAd Carmon J. Art9 Fierldian, ' - ~ , MCRBF VF.3TIN6 ggTAT>r IN StlRViViNd Nt188ANO ,.,~® • . ' A -.. , I~ t Gravn Road ' ~' I•'::a- sue yrn 3610 13. IA_ 87642 Idaho -'; ,, ,.;1~•; ~' Hcr~dian, Htcharl J. Arts ito•d e . i .'r. 1 ~~~ - ~~~~ cult Grov 361u K • f'O 83642 Idaho n ~ ; • 1,•1.1 So M,.ridi~+n. ,h Artc ,.:, St. Raymond d the l,otitioner• an p:aric R. lrtc Ahrii, 1955. at ?lt~ decedent, .ls of the '' t des" ri~d on =e until des },~, l.rte, intcrm•+r since that anc~ ever Naa:l,a, Canyon CO'utty, Idaho. taurc hu~:•.,nd and wife• et dvr~':1~'nt~s death. thc• ciat.. V, ... • ,..tition- as duscrit~ed in F ' asl,i,te, 4he °ecedent l•-ft an arty of ommunity i%rQ= + of c cot:sistinq solely and Raynond V. nrte. Petition. ' , . souse, rr s and her surviving P the petiticner t the deceden ySe of tho decadent. ta- BP°• •,;;~ declaring and us that as the surviving e Court u is entitled to the Decree bf roperty became fully nity P d comet the sole that all of sa. r as r ' blishing in the petitione 1976. 11 ~ , d on April tw veste y heir of the: decedent. _ .. Vl. uir~d 1-Y law. n given as req ..: T.il notices haves bee ADJUDGt:D AND D£CR°•tD• : i I`u OhDi:I:I":D, TIl£Itk•t'ux£ ~ 1T ~ hus he survivin, NOW, t .,.• i., he petitioner, g;,}c• >n : '. {nlluwin9 ~uscrit,vd .., that t ,,i dec<<1.•r•~ ~l,~rty of l,ru,d t;f the ., d ,.:,il}' t:- ~ SC~nal 1i1"~':''"' •al :1ni: is~'I-50I:11 rlfa l~ .,tnt 1..• 7 • an3 .1.. in. and d quiet.•d ,~titioncr ;;aid l. •: in. an i s t,ow and 2,• ~ ~ '. 1976 . ,--~1,~r.ty 3s of April 11, ,. ,, 1 : Ihu:..,;, to Rzyrooltd `l. Arte, olaim or estate. t . dir title, oC all right. °r arld clear as heir dec`''sed~ ee te f , r Ar the said Marie R• ubject to all . ~- s under demand creditor and , roper xcept as a P e „1hnr~Iisr` taxes. • inl,~•rit;ul~'e trt- d di:. ~ , :Itat' .uul :;ct .i,~crc,'cl an t ,~,t,~:., l rui~~•r t~ , Thu roal and 1,~,rFOna1 1 1•,ws: scriL.:s as Col , articula•lY de .d is more p butt- . :;1iltV/•JiNi; IlUS1tAN'~ 1 " Iria•iti;i: Vl•a'i•INt; i::~1l~PF, lil ~~- . ~ ' r ~. ' rf~ ~` ~~i,4 ~~r~~~: n •.,. s L,! ^~§r~ ,. ` 4F t:rr., _~ .. REAL PROPERTY ;ham south hal£ of the south half of then northwest cuarter of the southwest quarter of Section 32, ~~wnsllip 9 North, Range 1 East. Boise ~Seridian, together with all ar+d singular the tenements. hcreditarnvnts and appurtenances thereunto belong- ing o: in anywise appertaining. t})o reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof. PERSONAL PROPERTY 1. 1573 Toyota Pickup, I.D. ARN-22.016,070 2. hank Act:ountsi: a. Savings: 1. I.N.G. (Idaho National Guard) Fedcrel Crcr]it Unfon, Account !4360-2 2. First Federal Savings and Loan Asso- ciation. Orchard Branch, Boise, Idaho, T.ccount t 4095 3. Home Federal SAVings and Loan Associa- tion Westgate Dranch, Boise, Idaho. Account f2000G52 b. ChecY.ingt Id.... > Pirst Nations+l Rank, tl~ridian, Idaho Acco+:nt / 1241 0255 OS 085109 3. Mircellarrous iarsonal ltzultc•rt;t. IT JS FURTHl;R OkUERED, ADJ;I[)~:Ia) 11Td1) {)!•:C1tEh:U, that any ctthrr cru~+tnunity (•rohr•rty not nrra 1. T; ,wn ~,r !lirc~ovc•red w;:ich • ~ n!1 the I,r• t a - way Lr.lunrl to a;:+id .lecc•dt•nt :~r • ~ it t..t~•~t m+y t.ioner, or it which t.h~ f:.t+•1 have an intf:rc•.t an'] th+• u•u • Ve:;tt•r] in It.tytituTtd V, ilT t+ ~; i r/b. ht: t'Llt this, ~' tlay t. (~ C' rr•v Arfa t;ri• .: V. yfnh. 61. ,,.nr,~., .,r r,.-j• ,,.• ~,. ,r ~_..r,. ..., .1'•~1 •.~ A 1'.. !111!!'1 .. .• !q ~ ~),~.q a .. 1 ,l i . i ~ ~... ~ r ••r... ~ t t,{;t'1+1.1: 1'1 :.1'lli!: 1;;:'1/,II: IiJ :i{t11V1\'1!i•: '.1•.!!!.:-' at.;lurr•i Jo;;,•l•n V. Ar' l:.ta,]:a tht ~ I. pr's th4 v tha 15 bli v~ ) h~ ~I,, 6 ~, A. t t,i ~1~p~ 'R i F~a{,.,~ ~.`. ;n., ~ 4 7. 4 ~~ . ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ' ~ ~~ +. r ~, -. '~l' "- e'l ~ ry ~ ,~~ - ~ ~ n ~. 4~ t ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ J. `- t ,,~M _ _ ~ ~' ~VA$RANTX" p~D ~s ~; n ~ ~~ I ` ~ `POS VALt7E a.~G~tv>;n, , salt niid aanbeS- us-to t;_ " ~, i TAYLpB, the Crawc~ ~ s do 'hereby;,,~ra~t. '~hiP~. P.O. ~dx 87,.9oise, ~;~ 'F' E. ~ - .x: USTICIC 4G PAF~'3`N~• es-''?d~4 ~eg~` amfaea, : to-~Ita ' ~-~ ~, ` ID ~ 8370,. tle t3t'!-tatiier the feltowtn~~, d~ort~d, ~' _ ' y ..; , ~ .-. ~ ,~;~ ~~ 9'I~a "aout$west :Quexter at ttia, t'~cu'tk-weet Quartn` o! Y j _ -"~ptian 32r 2`nvP+~uhi~ d,,l~far3h+~. ~-~-:1 East except'. ~ ~~~' '~. Belay; tY4arldi,~s Add. ~~~ +~~ of Idaho ~ , rtlons :lylrig' ~,tls(zr tTStiak Soad- rae~-~,1~oat-at ~ , + °~tifaee~ rie } _ - ~,~ ~ , ~ °rfi4b,; thsh` i-jlpurienancet, k . ~~ x - - TO IiAV1i A;,tIy~-TO ~~LD the" told ~_t> ~, /end: thll eeid- On-ntors :' tee, (tlr`#elrs end ~g~ ~orevef~ srs t~ti` bv+ns~ !n ~,~'~ :~ iintd:.the aa(d ~i!ean ~ ~Yji} ~th4t thby ~` .~ ~ ~ ~ do:::6ereby naaenatit~to mod. tivttt, tfa4 . ~ t'rea, f~rS-aY R11~anerimbzsnc~s w ~- :" Leal ample of ~eild premiaes3 ;-'tlv't aali~~ p ~,T. N~ ~' ~~trlotionl' and x~rarvsilons of = aacasnt ny~+ront taxes.''ani~di- ~nty~t ~1~,': ~fe~e., the se.no hbol ° alt Lrrhil ~ ~ ~ ~ ~`'~ attd rite[ (#rat-ta~ - : ~= record, er y r - ,r~ . ~ ~~'~" ._ olatma,wi~nteeev ~~f _- .ri.-rc. .. ~ ~ _ , gam, ~~ r. 4;~E" , ..AA'i'ED this -- ~l `k~' day of ~., t' ` ~, ~<- 33 ~~ 9 ~ ;~: ~ ~Q ~I,''r #~ ~ , . <- ~~ ar AntCt. Tnylor ~ .., r~hd` t4~ J~ ; t ry 1 1 n't ~'I~r~ '° e~. Cou>stq of ~ - rM (t~ betnrr+ mar tgr ut~deratltusdt ,a ~'~ ~ ; un thls,,, ~ day afJ~~~ l0 1 s `' gt~BLA L. " .~.,~.• r ~ NoUr , ~S~ttbltct #n~s`p"~' far said tltatr~. poreottnity e~np d~wlf~a 'tAd~ 'f ~y "" -:gENNET~, "ic6~ nr Idontlt(ed to nro to be thel p ':, ' the>wtthln;lnstppalont and erknow(ed~d to tna tttst ito sx+yreu ~ .,, the. creme. - , Y~~' 4: , ,~ Ttd WITNE98'tQ1(EkLOF I have he to eat m head attd; sft'lttad ~ "fit • • wr(ttnn~ - , tsy afriotat seat thn day. gad gear ~n th(s , ~ 6 ~. g ee o { ~ ~s; nntuw+/ nnennn/~uttuliu g. stt : d0+.~~,.~~''"'`°" ~ ° ~, i~ Q F F I Q 1 A L glbPf Mq ep,tnalnslon .xp(tws/t`G/t 7 /I ~ ' ~~~ ` ~OE4RtiiR ~ ~~~ ~ ~°~" ~; -. .~ hltitltt111tt11t11NItIH11111/htl >. ,. ~~ ~~ -:~ ~vrntt~rt~r~r n~~n - i i ,~ ',' ~ fr" :'~5". .'fib ?~` ,. ~. r^~. "~ ~ ~: ~ ~ . K ":~ 44TTtt ~ "'qty 1'F` }. '}''ur'n _.. `-aS ~. +' ~~Yd°N T y 1 ~'• •: C 4 ti ~ 9 :.. ~~~~`, t~ s ~ ` ~ ~ " ;:.-~ 4 i ~ y ~~ ~,~` ,rye' ~ .y ,' ,~ I,L}•.iiAM'i:" } ry ! l e.yk 4'C F ~ ~ti ~ • 1 { :~M1! ,~ ~`!)n ~ ~ r. ~ ~ s a ~' y >n ~,s 5 ' r t '~ ~ ~ ' ,. -- ado-:~ ~ sir 4 ~ ~ i ~~; ~r +" ~~d r "'+rd~ :Y+. v ~ 'R'te •l~•tt:~s ~• •.k ~.~.. + .~ t ~ `'" t ' .1~ t ''~ ti.'-' Y ~ `ACS .f++ y - '+-`. ~ :,•7. ~ •' t `Yd r K 1 ~ ,.. a ~ .~ } d ~ ~. +.,° ' STATE OF CALIFORNIA) `~ a ' ) ss. ~P _. dR~ ~ i ) ~ ~ Y ~ county of _7t_' / ~{ c «_ ~ ; ~~ da of /~nap lflfl6 beforo me, the undorsl~nod, ~' s~ ~ ~: ~+~~+ Y On this Y '~~ `~ ~ "° t y crsunall a ,cared BARBARA ANN ~ tF 1 a Notar Publie in and~or said State, p- Y PI , ~ I TAYLOR, mown or identifiod to me to be the porsun whoso namo is subscribed i-.~ 'x. r kt ~ ' t.o the wllhh, instrument and ncY.uawledged to me that shc• executed the saw+o. k 6 4 ~ „ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 11'Nl:SS VYIIP.ItFOF, I havo hercuntu set my hand and afCl~ed 4~ ~ ~~ `` - IN W s, p}.~{,,~~ ~~ i.- .j ip`~.F .{tr .A - ~ ~ 1~~ i ~ ,~~ ~ ~, !seal tho d:+y and year in tats certificate C( •t ab vo y.~rliten. i 1'. 4V a~ r •~ ~'~ ` o ry Publie or CaliCor:~ia ~F` ~~' ~ , lding ot: 1,~~1S51.ittt~t (,t'r:; ~~ lo`~ '.~ My commission expires: t ~ 1 I`I 1 ~ ~ 'r_ ,~ u _ i it ~ I -, ~ OfFlC1At 8FAL ~ s `<. yy~, r 1`. -., i JIM DICENSO ~ P_,' ttI - No1Fi EBNO ICOUMY o ~ t'~ f~~ - ~^%~ ~~~~ i~'~ ,1 Niy COII1fNSilOn E~~ .f ^~~ S' .F 7/rr "~. .1wY e. Iva '~ ~ c, i ~_ ~~ ~~ r ,~ ~~~'' ~ 't ~ TL 1l qM~'.. - 1~ ~. K,. ~ _~ i w+.. ~ L+f '~~ ,fix •~'!•~~ e I tj ~~'~- ~10 ``. ~ F~ z, {~-~ ~y ` r~_ ~ ~`c' y V I _ Py _, ~~ ~ .~~~•; t~+~ ~fi : r .~ -,- _ r r / 1 tJ [ r r r, 1 e. .91 J(~N 23 i'rl ? 1G ' , ~~f ~.. ` f" . ~ ~h~', .. ~E' '~~rt ~1 ar `~, `~ A 'off' r 4 ~k ` 1 ~"'LQ ~,rs,z :~ ~ s ,~ k~ . .~r ~ _ ~~~!~~ ,. ,, ((,~~'' t V .. ~ ~"1 Sv,Ut{lr'•ii`I'Y Illil?j) - Y. ''~~~.~~ .1y xK,y J ~' 14~ ~lJ Ju r1~r- }~i ~ ~~ •.~~_ t ter'" 1'~ ~°Tt ~ ~'y±l~ tv{.~F. ~. 1"`OFF' k ~ a~ 1{, a w ~~.1 - Y ~. ~. { rf ~ y+ ado y 7~~~~~,`Y 1 ti Y r lf~ r ~ 'y~.} s# ~.; #" r~ 'S`' ~r{'`~ Y ',fir" 1 . y~, ,~ ~ ~ ~s _ µ ~ ~~ S~'' JJ~~-- ~~7~7 ~-;rre p~., s ~ ~y. ~?, lri f "'• --~~ .~~t r<'~ ~ p _ ~. ~ • ~.+ t _~ ~h f 7 v~5 T1{ ~ - r~-~~ .T- ~ t ~1 1 ~t ~ ~~ R' n.i k~J ~~ ' 1„1 '~ 5f~71. ~ ~.-t~~,`.; 9~Li1~~•-~~ ~Y'~nykti .~ ~,r ~t4-~~~4' ff~ '~ ~ ~ '''?~ i [~° ~ 4 '{R ~ ~ ~~ _'ac ~ .k~ ~1`f iT Y fit 'r~N Y~• ~ ,y.5 -i'' 6~~, t.. p ) t i~r - ".iIi .3 'pt .. Z . ' °~,, `~l ",~} ~ t 7`e ~ "„' 1 . x ~.. ~ F 1 -v ~' f ~ ~ ~ i v tr 'Jrl }~ r~ r 7* ~:~. ,. ,~ ~ ; „ - • - ~gtea~,~is. ADDRESS CHANGE: Voigt Davis, Realtors 1908 Jennie Lee Drive Idaho Falls ID 83404 G. L. Voigt Construction, Inc. 1908 Jennie Lee Drive- physical location PO Box 2044 - mailing address Idaho Falls, ID 83403-2044 Our telephone number remains the same 524-6000 Please change your records to show our correct address. Thank you- Stop by our new location to see our beautiful new offices(East of Shopko) . ~~~ ~.-~ ` (208) 5 Z4-6000 • ~i~~ ~ s7-~~,~~ ~~~~ ~~~i~G~ ~~ 1277. E. 17th St. Idaho Falls, ID 83404 ~~ • N cD ~ N N M M ~ ~ N •t M '/~ ~I~/~ ~ ~ ~ r P r N N N ~ M N .- 1 N N ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ N r ~ r ~ i ao tt) I I ~ ~ N I ~ I V I I Q~ r ~ N ~ ~- T I ~ i T /°~ ~ N °m r r °p ' ~' N ~ d- t1 i ~ r• ~ ~noao lsnoo~ •N - - NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho, that the F~lanning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a p~.eblic hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p. m., on June 8, 1993, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of Raymond Ante, Ustick 40 Partnership and Vienna Vaughn, Trustee, for annexation and zoning of approximately 69.47 acres of land located in the Southwest i/4 of Section 32, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located at the Northeast Corner of the Ustick Road and locust Grove Road intersection. That the Application requests annexation with zoning of R-4. Further Applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval of the parcel of land above described far 200 dwelling lots for Summerfield Subdivision. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business ho~trs. A copy of 'the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this ~~ day of May, 1993. S, WAY S. F RREY, C I TY CLERK ;. NdTIGE OF NEARING NQTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the ordinances ofi the City ofi Meridian and the laws ofi the State of Idaho, that the City Council ofi the City afi Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Nall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p,m., on August 17, 1993, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of Raymond Ante, Ustick 4~i Partnership and Vienna Vaughn, Trustee, far annexatian and zoning ofi approximately 69.47 acres ofi land located in the Southwest 1/4 ofi Sectian 32, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located at the Northeast Career ofi the Ustick Road and Locust Grove Road intersection. That Application requests annexation with zoning ofi R-4. Further Applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval ofi the parcel of land above described for 20U dwelling lots for Summerfiield Subdivision. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk"s office at Meridian City Nall, 33 East Ida{~o Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy ofi the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this _,. _ ,_, __.__TM day of .7uly , 1993. WAYNE 5 , F'ORREY , CITY CLERK `' ..,.~.~..; g . -. D Sl,~rrtrrl ~2.~ 1 E~-D Sc.18D1 dl 51 ~~ --~ _ti 6 . 1 I II it ~I =~- `~' ., ~:~~ / _._ 1 w ! •. r • ;~_ 6 ii ~ ~ ~~ ~~ IN ~ I I , t 1~ N r 3~ ~~ i 1~. ie -- --~ AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 619 "' '~~.,F.`. ~ ~ ~ ~~;~~ (n~ r ' r AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXIN6'~D Z CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED THE SOt~`$ ~F } THE{ '~ SOUTH HALF OF THE NW1/4 OF THE SW1/4; AND THE SW1/4 OF THE SW1/4; AND A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SE1/4 OF T~~g ~11~4,- ALL 31~.,_ ,~ SECTION 32, T. 4N. , R. lE. , B.M. , ADA COUNTY, IDAH~~~:.AND. PROVIDING' ~'~ AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is hereinbelow described: The South half of the South half of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4; and the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4; and a portion of the West half of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, all in Section 32, T.4N., R.lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at :the.:eorner common to Sections 31 and 32, T.4N., R.IE., and Sections 5 and 6, T.3N., R.lE., B.M.; Thence North 00°00'08" West, 1661.81 feet to a 1/256 corner; from which the quarter corner common to said Sections 31 and 32 bears North 00°00'08" West, 997.19 feet; Thence North 89°49'45" East, 1327.33 feet to a 1/256 corner; Thence South 00°01'12" East, 331.83 feet to a 5/8" iron pin marking the SW 1/16 corner; Thence North 89°49'16" East, 663.49 feet to a 5/8" iron pin marking the C-E-SW 1/64 corner; Thence South 00°01'36" East along the East boundary of the West half of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, 1031.32 feet to a point; Thence South 89°43'17" West, 200.00 feet to a point; Thence South 00°01'36" East, 295.00 feet to a point on the South boundary of said Section 32; Thence South 89°43'17" West, 1791.51 feet to the Point of AMENDED SUMMERFIELD ANNEXATION ORDINANCE Page - 1 ' • Beginning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the above and referenced real property described as: The South half of the South half of the NW1/4 of the SW1/4; and the SW1/4 of the SW1/4; and a portion of the West half of the SE1/4 of the SW1/4, all in Section 32, T.4N., R.lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the corner common to Sections 31 and 32, T.4N., R.lE., and Sections 5 and 6, T.3N., R.lE., B.M.; Thence North 00°00'08" West, 1661.81 feet to a 1/256 corner; from which the quarter corner common to said Sections 31 and 32 bears North 00°00'08" West, 997.19 feet; Thence North~89°4.9'45" East, 1327.33 feet to a 1/256 corner; Thence South 00°01'12" East, 331.83 feet to a 5/8" iron pin marking the SW 1/16 corner; Thence North 89°49'16" East, 663.49 feet to a 5/8" iron pin marking the C-E-SW 1/64 corner; Thence South 00°01'36" East along the East boundary of the West half of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, 1031.32 feet to a point; Thence South 89°43'17" West, 200.00 feet to a point; Thence South 00°01'36" East, 295.00 feet to a point on the South boundary of said Section 32; Thence South 89°43'17" West, 1791.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and is zoned R-4 Residential; that the reason for the R-4 zoning is to allow 200 AMENDED SUMMERFIELD ANNEXATION ORDINANCE Page - 2 single family dwelling units on the parcel which would be an approximate density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre, which would be allowed in the R-4 Residential zone; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning; that Applicant pay any development fee or transfer fee if adopted by the City of Meridian; that Applicant shall pay any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City of Meridian as a condition of annexation and if not paid the land shall be de-annexed. Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de- annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: 1. Plat the property ~s submitted by Applicant, designate on the plat that.on~y single-family dwellings shall be allowed, and allow only single-family houses of at least 1,500 square feet for single level homes and 1,800.00 square feet for double level homes, as agreed to by the Applicant, within the subdivision. 2. Tile all ditches, canals and waterways, including those that are property boundaries or only partially located on the property. 3. Extend and construct water and sewer line extensions to serve the property and connection to Meridian water and sewer lines shall be made. 4. Construct streets to and within the property. 5. Dedicate the necessary land from the centerline of Ustick and Locust Grove Roads for public right-of-way. 6. Allow only houses of at least 1,500 square feet for single level houses and 1,800 square feet for double level houses. 7. Pay any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City of Meridian. 8. Enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2- 416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address, but not be limited to, the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C., G., H. 2, R., L. and the comments of the Planning Director, Wayne Forrey, relating to the lack of adequate recreation facilities, a school site or fees in lieu thereof, and AMENDED SUMMERFIELD ANNEXATION ORDINANCE Page - 3 • that land be set a side for a future park and relating to development of greenbelts along any canals or drainages within the subdivision. 9. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above conditions the property shall be subject to de-annexation, which conditions subsequent shall run with land and also be personal to the owner and Applicant. Section 4 . That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Amended Ordinance. Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Amended Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this ~? ~ day of CCs.L~f~~2y , 1994. APPROVED: n /~" ~ /' MAYOR -- G I/RANT Ili SF RD AMENDED SUMMERFIELD ANNEXATION ORDINANCE Page - 4 •~~ ATTEST: CITY LERR -- WILLIAM RG STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM BERG, City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NW1/4 OF THE SW1/4; AND THE SW1/4 OF THE SW1/4; AND A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SE1/4 OF THE SW1/4, ALL IN SECTION 32, T. 4N., R. lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE"; passed as Amended Ordinance No. 619 , by the City ~ouncil and Ma or of the City of Meridian, on the ~ day of ~eC~~~~.~-- , 1994, as the same appears in my office. DATED this ~ ~ day o~f' ~ ,6~ecern b.e~- , 1994. ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~Q ~ ~' ~~ ~~. ~ A,r ~ ` ~--~ ~~ i y Clerk, City o ridian ~ Ada County, Idaho ~ . STATE OF ~ ~ r`'~ l ~t • ~~ ~• County of ~ ~~~~~~ ~~ On this to day of ,o/~~C;w~,6er . , 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM BERG, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official;; seal t~{g~ day and year in this certificate first above written., ~o°°°j1B B8°0j° i ~ G E ~., . G s ,~~~~ see SEAL ~¢+ ~o o ary Pu is for Idaho ~• ~~~'!/{~ ~.~~ v~ a R iding at Meridian, Idaho ~ ~°4u~ °°°°°P° AMENDED-SUMMERFIEf~D ANNEXATION ORDINANCE Page - 5 I I I I ~ I ~ • I ' I ~ I _ -______ I -_ _ __.. ___ __ __.._. __ _ _._ _ ---. - _ __. 1 ~ ~ i - ~ 1 _.-._-_ ~ -._ .~ _ a 4 8 --- -- --- --- . _- ~ --taFG[lON L2, I - ----- - - - --' I .. _ _ - --- - - - I i t~ I~ I i _ I i I~ li I~ `V~ ~~ ~~_-LY. ~^- _ _ LC/I,pfl~ _ Igo In_~ - I.a -_ _. -- - - ~ II I i - i i I~ ~I •~ i ~ ~ i ~ _ I > ~.~ I i ~ ~ -- - ~ I I - ------ --- - --- -- -- - .~= ~ ~ - ~ I ~ ~ bit' I i i 1 ~ t - ~ "~' I ----- =J _- t-- -- ~ ;: ~ ~ ~ - -...~ ~ ~:tg ~ ~~~ I _ I `- I : ~~ ' ~ 1Jo~[N Pmt°A~t'4~Q ~T I ~Z~. ~+ r -- -- ------ -- _,. t '..~~€" ~ O O ~ _ ~ tLi I ~~ i O` ~ ®` I - ,~.z ; I _ ~ ,, e ~\ ' o 6 i ® ® a I [V ~.~:- i ~ I r _ ~~` I 1 n '~ ~~3' / ®~ ~ 4 ` ; __ ~.3~ ~ o ~ $ ~" " ° ~ ~ - l i ® I / L Imo, ~ ~° ' =fig r -- ~ _ ® ~_ O ® ~ ® ® ® ~ ® ~ © ® ~ i ag i - -- - _ _ LIS IG - ~ POINT of ' $~6tNN~NC~ tlw. zm' X37652 6 c ~ J. DA`:%~ ~~ ; ,,';';~;;~:.:; ORDINANCE NO. 1.4~ R E C O R D c k B Y ~ `~ Sca,~W tytc.~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN H IS DESCRIBED ~ 1~C~PE}Y1 THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF ~~~~ ~ E ``~~jj~1~~JJ~~ THE SW1/4; AND THE SW1/4 OF THE SW1/4; AND A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE S E1/4 OF THE SW1/4, ALL IN SECTION 32, T. 4N., R. lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is 'in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is hereinbelow described: The South half of the South half of the NW1/4 of the SW1/4; and the SW1/4 of the SW1/4; and a portion of the West half of the SEl/4 of the SW1/4, all in Section 32, T.4N., R.1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the corner common to Sections 31 and 32, T.4N., R.lE., and Sections 5 and 6, T.3N., R.lE., B.M.; thence North 00°00'08" West, 1661.81 feet to a 1/256 corner; from which the quarter corner common to said Sections 31 and 32 bears North 00°00'08" West, 997.19 feet; thence South 89°49'45" West, 1327.33 feet to a 1/256 corner; thence South 00°01'12" East, 331.83 feet to a 5/8" iron pin marking the SW1/16 corner; thence North 89°49'16" East, 663.49 feet to a 5/8" iron pin marking the C-E-SW1/64 corner; thence South 00°01'36" East along the East boundary of the West half of the SE1/4 of the SW1/4, 1031.32 feet to a point; thence South 89°43'17" West, 200.00 feet to a point; thence South 00°01'36" East, 295.00 feet to a point on the South boundary of said Section 32; thence South 89°43'17" West, 1791.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the above and referenced real property • • described as: The South half of the South half of the NW1/4 of the SW1/4; and the SW1/4 of the SW1/4; and a portion of the West half of the SE1/4 of the SW1/4, all in Section 32, T.4N., R.lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the corner common to Sections 31 and 32, T.4N., R.lE., and Sections 5 and 6, T.3N., R.1E., B.M.; thence North 00°00'08" West, 1661.81 feet to a 1/256 corner; from which the quarter corner common to said Sections 31 and 32 bears North 00°00'08" West, 997.19'feet; thence South 89°49'45" West, 1327.33 feet to a 1/256 corner; thence South 00°01'12" East, 331.83 feet to a 5/8" iron pin marking the SW1/16 corner; thence North 89°49'16" East, 663.49 feet to a 5/8" iron pin marking the C-E-SW1/64 corner; thence South 00°01'36" East along the East boundary of the West half of the SE1/4 of the SW1/4, 1031.32 feet to a point; thence South 89°43'17" West, 200.00 feet to a point; thence South 00°01'36" East, 295.00 feet to a point on the South boundary of said Section 32; thence South 89°43'17" West, 1791.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and is zoned R-4 Residential; that the reason for the R-4 zoning is to allow 200 single family dwelling units on the parcel which would be an approximate density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre, which would be allowed in the R-4 Residential zone; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning; that Applicant pay any development fee or transfer fee if adopted by the City of Meridian; that Applicant shall pay any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City of Meridian as a condition of annexation and if • • not paid the land shall be de-annexed. Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de- annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: 1. Plat the property as submitted by Applicant, designate on the plat that only single-family dwellings shall be allowed, and allow only single-family houses of at least 1,500 square feet for single level homes and 1,800.00 square feet for double level homes, as agreed to by the Applicant, within the subdivision. 2. Tile all ditches, canals and waterways, including those that are property boundaries or only partially located on the property. 3. Extend and construct water and sewer line extensions to serve the property and connection to Meridian water and sewer lines shall be made. 4. Construct streets to and within the property. 5. Dedicate the necessary land from the centerline of Ustick and Locust Grove Roads for public right-of-way. 6. Allow only houses of at least 1,500 square feet for single level houses and 1,800 square feet for double level houses. 7. Pay any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City of Meridian. 8. Enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2- 416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address, but not be limited to, the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C., G., H. 2, R., L. and the comments of the Planning Director, Wayne Forrey, relating to the lack of adequate recreation facilities, a school site or fees in lieu thereof, and that land be set a side for a future park and relating to development of greenbelts along any canals or drainages within the subdivision. 9. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above conditions the property shall be subject to de-annexation, which conditions subsequent shall run with land and also be personal to the owner and Applicant. Section 4 . That the City Clerk shall cause one (1 j copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this 7th day of September, 1993. APPROVED: MAYOR -- GRANT I GSF RD ATTEST: CITY CLERK -- WILLI ERG STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM BERG, City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NW1/4 OF THE SW1/4; AND THE SW1/4 OF THE SW1/4; AND A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SE1/4 OF THE SW1/4, ALL IN SECTION 32, T. 4N., R. lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE"; passed as Ordinance No. ~f ~ , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the ~ day of , 1993, the same appears in my office. .....,. ' IDA~1;D this ~ day of li-, "y`-3 , 1993 . '' 1r .~. 4~ iw s~°J • \~ rJ . . `'~ t~ City Clerk, City of ri ::~~„ ~+~ `,~„~ 4' Ada County, Idaho ~~._ ~;;"~ r'.;~;, ' ~ r O ,y? ``~TATE ~ b~' ~T~DAHO ,) +~ ~'~ ~~ c~ • ~ h . Y ' 4~~ f ~i ~' ~ ~,~ t, i 4• ~ • ~ ~ ~ : S s . ~'~ ~`} ^f' ~ rte;; ~' i:, Countx~~•of Ada, ) `~ ,~. '~• ti ~ ~~ ~.ti. }e~z.• fl$ C+sa atm. ^ ' On this 7th da of Se tember 1993 b~~6 ~'~' a tt undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said Statta~rr ~s~~x`j,~ L ~_ appeared WILLIAM BERG, known to me to be the person o~er;•~~ne°~'? subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and a~ that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. SEAL w~`~~r~.r`®.~~ ®®~~'N e N a Public for Idaho ~ t~ °`~d ~ ~ es' ing at Meridian, Idaho .. o = .~~ M mtnission 04/01/99 ` ~®~(®~ ~ °~'~° ~ ~ ® ; ~% as ~~ ~,~~ C° rt` :~t''1 L. Y { Y • p T MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 17, 1993 F'AGE 7 ITEM #8: PUPLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING TO R-4 WITH SUMMERFIELD PRELIMINARY PLAT BY USTICK, RAYMOND ARTE AND VIENNA VAUGHN, TRUSTEE: Kingsford: I will open the Public Hearing at this time and invite the owner or his designee to speak first. Dan Hubble, 955~t1 Bethel Court, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Hubble: I am here as the representative for this proposed project. I'd like to explain a little bit about it. Presented map for Council to view. This project is located at the intersection of Ustick and Loc~~st Grove, Ustick is on the lower portion of the map the southerly boundary and Locust Gr^ove is on the westerly boundary. It consists of approximately 69 acres and we have a total of 197 lots. Our request tonight is for preliminary plat, rezone and annexation. All the streets within subdivision are going to be public streets and they will meet all ACHD standards. They have also asked for widening on Ustick and Locust Grave and the developer will do that as well. At Ustick and Locust Grove they have asked for a total of 9Q1 feet of right of way, that would give us approximately Sid) feet of room to landscape with and the developer is allowing an additional 2QI feet so we'll have a total of about forty feet of open space along Ustick and Locust Grove. That will be landscaped, this is a concept of what the landscaping will look at the entrances dplan shown and explained - see tape). Sewer and water will be provided by the City and they are currently planned to come down LOCUSt Gt^ove Road and will be stubbed into this development and constructed as developed. The drainage within this at^ea will be handled like other subdivisions, all additional run-off will be Y^etained on site and the overflow will be discharged into a natural drainage way. We have additional open space which consists of bike paths and a large common open space near the center of the project. The developer is proposing to da a soccer• field here, this will be landscaped. It will be owned and maintained by the homeowners association and in total the open space will consist of approximately 3 acres. As said in the record and at the Planning & Zoning Hearing the minimum home siae -•~ill be 15~Q1 sq. ft. far single stories and 180Qt sq. ft. for two stories. The developer has pr^epared covenants which state in essence that the intent of the development is to maintain a minimum home price of ~130,Rd06t1 and we have a copy of those covenants here tonight. We have made an effort to make some of the changes requested by the City Engineer. One of those changes ' ~ • • t9ER I D I At+i C I TY CaUNC i L AUGUST 17, 1493 F~AGE 9 was to connect one of the streets on the east whic!-, wa-.~ld eliminate the length of a loop street. We've also looked at the culdesac lengths to make sure that we're within the 45~t foot criteria. If we haven't heard back from the City Engineer yet whether that complies with that 1~t6ZIQ1 feat maximum length but if not we will need to request a variance for that loop street but our intention is tt-~at by re-designing these streets we've complied with that one canditian. The additional comments made by the City Engineer we have acknowledged and attempted to 'r^esolve those an this layout and if that is still not satisfactory we' 11 do tt-oat in the final planning het^e and wa~~2d •re-submit that to the City Engineer prior to s~~bmittal of final plat. We've seen a n~,mber of cancer^ns raised by neighboring property owners the pt^imary concerns are density, traffic and Schaal crowding. Our density far this project is slightly less than 3 lets to the acre and we're applying to be caned as R-4 which will allow a total of 4 lots to tt--e acre sa we're not near what the maximum density would be for this zone. The developer has also engaged a traffic engineer to look at the traffic floa~ within the subdivision and on the adjacent streets ar-d that has shaa~n that we will not adve?^sely impact the traffic in the neighbor^haod to the e•rttent that those streets can handle that amount of traffic. They are designed as a miner arterial and are arterial and can well accommodate whatever additional ti^affic is created het^e. As far as school crowding, the developer is sensitive to that issue just like everybody else and as stated that they will participate in any kind of a transfer tax or athei^ fee that may be assessed in the future to help with the school f~lnding. I might .just note that the Planning ~ Zoning Commissioro voted unanimously to recommend approval and we hope that you will ta. I'd be haPPY to answer any questions you may have. Giesler: On the ti^affic of Locust Grove, were they aware of all the other s-.-bdivisions that at^e proposed an that same street's Hubble: I think that that pt^obably .just considered whatever subdivisions have been final platted. Whatever is in existence today. I don't think that he necessarily accounted for proposed subdivisions. t~ingsford: Is this a document that we have access to? Hubble: It's net yet been submitted but you will have access. • MERIDIAN! CIT'( COUNlCIL AUGUST 17, 1993 PAGE 9 Crookston: If I'm remembering this application at the time it was heard at Planning and Zoning I think there was same discussion as to whether or not there needed to be a connecting stt^eet to the north. Hubble: Yes I remember discussion, but don't remember if that was a requirement or not or a recommendation. I might just say that Ada Ca-.inty Highway District has reviewed this and I'm not sure that they made that same condition. Kingsford: I don't recall that being their findings. We're very sensitive to traffic flows and land-locking so consideration needs to be given, I don't know when^e would be the appropriate place but not getting in there to far there ought to be some consider^ation given to the north. Hubble: Now there was one to the east and that's the one that was added. Crookston: As I remember there was same q+.iestion as to whether• or not the owner to the north had any intentions immediately of developing and I think that they owne~^ was at the P R Z hearing and he said he did not decided anything one way or the other. Bait it jest seemed to me that that would be appropriate to have a stub street to the noz^th upon eventaial development. At out^ growth rate now I wo~~ld anticipate that that would occur^ ~^elatively shortly. Kingsfot^d: Any other questions or comments? No response. Anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony on this issue? Vern Alleman, ~iQ-1 E. Ustiek, Meridian, was sworn by the attorney. Alleman: I would suggest that they not only consider the present traffic that is there and the ones that at••e approved but they also consider the traffic from the ones that are in consideration or going to be considered because I live across the road from this subdivision and there's going to be a problem much more than i t i s now. Kingsford: I would hope tt"iat they used the population density's for our Comprehensive Plan as they figured those. Alleman: If there is a problem with the schools how are we going to solve the problems after this is all approved? MERIDIAI'd CIT'r COUhlCIL AUGUST 17, 1493 !='AGE 10 Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? • Bev Dalrymple, 35x9 N. Locust Groue, Meridian, was sworn by the attorney. Dalrymple: ^ur driveaaay is directly across from the entrance of this s~~bdivision. We a1^e a small horse breeding operation. I' m very concerned about the kids in this subdivision and my horses, because stallions and kids don't mix and pets and horses don't mix. We've had small pf^oblems with people's dogs and kids. Kids are attracted to horses and a stallion does not understand and they at^e dangerous. We're vex^y concerned abort this. I' m a small trainer, I don't want kids in my place, we have that -.rnderstood. We have another place in Ada Co+anty and you can't i-:eep kids o~4t, they don't stay o-.et. Concerned somebody wi 11 get hurt. Giesler: What would your like to see done with tfiat property? Dalrymple: Just exactly what it is, hay fields and agric~rlture. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? F+aul Spurk, 3534 Curt Drive, was sworn by the attorney. Sput^k: One of the concerns I have is the fact of the density. One of the reasons why I built and bought the ho+.rse that I live f n right now i s beca~-se it' s on an acre and the fact that Ust icl-t Road had mast 1 y lot^ger acre 1 of s. When I see thi s I' m appal 1 ed at the amount of houses that they are going to pert in 69 acres. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? John Montony, 3790 ~+aradise Lane, was sworn by the attorney. Montony: I live in Heritage Subdivision and we're probably the nearest sizeable subdivision adjacent to this proposed development with only a band-aid separating us from the proposed horsing. I.le're being conditioned daily on the assumption that your can't stop progress. By classic definition progress repT^esents a better way of life, higher^ quality of life, more efficient lower cost living for sei^vices received and sec~rrity for our families. I doubt that any of us are against pt^ogress by that definition, however what we're seeing and the clear outcome of the recent direction of this Comm unity and the instant • MERIDIAN CIT`( COUNCIL AUGUST 17, 1993 !WAGE 1l question of the adjacent high density proposed Summerfield Development promises none of the features expected of progress. ~1e're already facing gr^eatly deter^iorating quality of life in this area from existing growth patter^ns. In the last two decades we've seen our property taxes almost tr^iple, traffic and urban noise an intrusion increase. Our schools ar^e over ba~rdened, our water supply is threatened, for all this we're paying more. We're paying more for^ less, mare for less quality, less security, less efficient schools, less quiet, less for our buck, that's not progress. Our is a maturing neighborhood and many with grown families and many are retired or appr^aaching retirement. Most have always intended this as their home. The ma.•jority selected their residence here for it's q~riet rural atmosphere. tFurther on same concerns - see tape) Corrie: Let me make sure I'm hearing you cor^rectly, you want h~leridian to shut the door. t~iont ony: I speak for t1'-e area that We live it-. Most of us o~.-r sensitive to things that are right in our hack yard. I do have a per^sonal opinion, of course I wish that we'd slow down de+,relopment until we have a more contingent plans in place for the problems that alr^eady escist. Kingsfor^d: I might .just comment that those sam made prior to yocer subdivision going in. All have happened have been on-going. I've been district for ~3 years and We've had all those years and we had them before i came. All of the talking about, you started off right it's question. e 5tat ement s Wer"e the things tt-,at with the school problems for ~3 things that your" a philosophical i-lontony: I .just think that there's a. lot of people that feel the same Way. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Rod DeVinaspre, 3466 Curt Dr"ive, Was sworn by the attorney. DeVinaspre: Rll I have to say is that three years ago I moved to Meridian because it was ga-iet here, 1 bought myself a small acre of property so I could have something to ]ive on and retire an and I g~eess I'm .just totally appalled to see all this building that's going on in all these subdivisions that ar••e being developed. My kids go to Chief Joseph, three years ago it was • lHERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 17, 1943 PAGE 1 empty and now it's almost f ull. these kids? F~irther concerns lanes, walkways. Where are they going to put all about school overcrowding, bike '~errington: The street you live on, how close are you to this subdivision? DeVinaspre: I'm half a mile. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Steve Sherer, ~09Qt Star Lane, Meridian, was sworn by the attorney. Sherer: I live in the Heritage S+abdivision also. There are some set^ious problems that I see with the proposed subdivision. General issues of traffic and school have already been mentioned. 4Gave view on school overcrowding - see tape) This property t^ight now is zoned RT which means nothing of a residential nature smaller than 5 acres, so what he proposed to da is to increase the density that's allowed there right now by 15 times. I don't think that's insignificant. There are many open parcels of land in Meridian and close to Meridian that are closer to existing City water and City sewer than this one. iFurther concerns - see tape) Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Carolyn Wagnild, ~80~ Jasmine Lane, was sworn by the attorney. Wagnild: My family and I purchased some acreage off of Eagle Road ro,~ghly three years ago. At that time it was abo+.tt 38 acres and we were in the middle of the impact zone, two impact zones, Boise and Meridian. After some time it tadrned out that we got the RT zoning which was five acres to one dwelling. We were happy with that. We have six horses, five children, and we moved to Meridian for the same reasons as many who have already spoken here this evening. In June, as a group, we neighbors met with Wayne Forrey the City Planner and we had a lot of concern as well as coming with a spirit of cooperation because we really felt that that spirit was what would help everyone come to a conclusion that would be harmonious far all of us. Batt 15 times as the previous speaker talked about in a density increase within two years because we came in 1991 and this was coned RT. Is R-4 zoning in this area, which"is a dispute at this point, is that t4ER I D I Al+! CITY COUNC I L AUGUST 17, 1993 RAGE 13 responsible an the part of the City of Meridian? I don't think so. In a letter that I submitted to Mr. Farrey in June I cited that the State of Maryland actually has a law that requires level apers to p-.-t ta~a percent up front in education. It's been in place far same time, obviously we know Idaho doesn't have that law b-.-t it would be nice if the developers would at least perhaps do this on a voluntary basis. They also putt money up front for sidewalks, watei^ and sewer. tFatrthei~ - see tape? W.ingsfard: Thank you. Anyone else"' Allison Donahue, 3775 N. Locust Grave, Meridian, was sworn by the attorney. Emi 1 y Beaulieu, 1895 Star Ln. , was sworn by the attorney. Donahue: We bath ga to Meridian Middle Schaal butt back when we were in the fifth grade we were bath in the same classroom at Joplin. We were in a very small classraam that contained quite a few kids. We were in a pa:^t of the library, they had j-.tst put up a wall around it and it was very small and very cramped. Beaulie-.t: With our new Middle School, the papulatiors of the childt^en is gt^owing sa rapidly that a~tr new school alt^eady this year is putting in three more portables. We think that instead of b-.ei lding mare new houses that yo~t should putt Meridian* s chi 1 dt^en' s education first . Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Dave Jillson, 3387 Curt Dt^., was sworn by attorney. Jillson: I live an Curt Dt^ive just about a half a mile west of Locust Grove and besides the problem with the school, the biggest problem we see living there is tt^affic. Addressed traffic issues - see tape. Kingsford: Thank ya~t. Anyone else? Beverly Donahue, 3775 hl. Lac-.tst Grove, was swot^n by the attorney. Donahue: I'm here tonight because everyone else is concerned about this subdivision going in. I do have the neat Comprehensive Flan, it's 'b3Q1.-D~1 if your interested. I was 'Q~eading it and on page 1 there's six paints for community values, ., ,~ • h1ERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 17, 1993 PAGE 14 The first one is manage growth to achieve high q uality development; the second is to enhance Meridian's quality of life far all residents; I can't see annexing the County to the City would help that at all. I would maybe p1^opase that when we start going an tree north side of Ustick why don't we ga one acre subdivisions or at least half act^es. That would slaw down a lot of the growth. The next ane is, new growth should finance public service expansion; I don't see how it's happening beca-tse ever~+ time I turn around our property taxes are going up, we're paying for this. The next one is, pt^event school aver^crowding, enhance education services; the schoals are overcrowded, their to their limit and same are over. I talked to Dr. Clark today and she told me they cannot keep a child out of any school they want to go to because the City of Meridian Schoal Hoard does not believe in busing. So you can have four hundred kids and they can ga to Joplin, it doesn't matter. tFurther an school overc~^owding - see tape) The next one is, e>:pond commercial and industrial development; I am all far that, we've gat to have .,jabs far all these people that are going to move in here. The next ane is, protect Meridian's self identity; this is the agriculture area, we're going to celebrate 1~Q1 years. 1+Jow this used to be known as the Dairy County^y, those homes are going right up next to a dairy. The othet^ question I have is regarding financing the school dish^ict that Mr. Hubble mentioned, what kind of money fig-.-re is he talking and when does he plan on paying it? Thank you for your time. Giesler: Did you attend any of the public hearings far this o•ampt^et-ensive plan? Donahue: tda, I could not. But I wi 1 I be at your next one. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Peggy Mayer, ~Q115 E. Paradise Lane, was sworn by the attorney. Mayer: We live in Heritage Subdivision and have lived thee^e ~3 years and recognize that growth is bound to came and I understand that your tt^ying yo-.-r best to da it in an organized fashior- because it has came up Locust G'r^ove to Ustick and then by going point to paint it would involve this sstbdivisian. I have two specifics and maybe they have been covered before. Concerned aba~it the roads and schoals - see tape. Kingsford: Thank yaps. Anj+ane else? MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 17, 1993 PAGE 15 • Diane Beaulieu, 1895 Star Lane, was swat^n by the attorney. Pea-,~lieu: You heard my daughter testify earlier this evening and I hope that she learns that when you speak up and you have a point to make that those of yaai who are on the Council take their points into consideration. Hopes Council will listen to concet^ns voiced this evening. Your decision will affect all of ats even tho-.igh we are in the County. Kingsfot^d: Thank you. Anyone else? Bill Levey, 1675 Star Lane, was sworn by the attorney. Levey: Concerns about school overcrowding, tt^affic, high density and p~iblic tt^ansportation. flee tape for full explanation) Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Helen Sharp, 8445 Wingate Lane, Meridian, was sworn by the attorney. Sharp: All things that have been addressed tonight are true. Ir- the other meetings I've attended we were going to get a good study on what they propose to do with Loc~~st Grove because of all this traffic. Opposed to high density. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Kathy Brown, 1795 Paradise Ln., Meridian, was sworn by the attorney. B1^ovan: We move to Paradise Lane about two and a half years ago to get out from the City into a rural subdivision. You pay the price to get the land to move to the country and you expect it to stay country. There's numerous places they can build these high density subdivisions. All the way around us at^e one to five acre pieces of property. Kingsford: Thank yogi. Anyone else? No response. I will close the P~tbl is Hearing. Crookston: I think there's been a substantial difference from the Planning and Zoning Hearing mostly in the context of what ewerybody said and the number of people. I think we need to at least take another look at the findings. J . • • MER I D I Ate! C I TY COUI+tC I L AUGUST 17, 1993 PAGE 16 The Motion was made by Carrie and seconded by Giesler to have the attorney prepare new Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law or- S-ammer^field annexation and zoning. Motion Carried: All Yea: Currie: I really appreciate yo-a people do listen. One thing that I hope you do far as the school bond is that you consideration too because we can't do Council to alleviate the school problem. do everything we can. coming out tonight. We when you go to vote as give that a lot of anything here at City We're going to try to Tolsma: I noticed everybody here addressed one subdivision, the school overcrowding is probably pertaining to every subdivision that's down here but yo~~ only regulated one subdivision. Also we had a hearing her^e a while back on a moratorium to stop building in the City of Meridian, our local school district did not really support the moratorium. That's why we're having to call it off after ]~0 days. You might q-aestion year local School District and the School Berard about why they would not support our moratorium on new building. We have no legal grounds to stop building. Kingsford: In my ~3 years in Meridian School District we've been crowded every one of those years and at some point and time as yo-.i peopl a arr^i ve at 1 east the ones that I heard that said I moved here two years ago, ten years ago, someone was saying the same thing about you as you came. This is a progression that takes place and we recognize this. Kingsford: We will take a five minute break - Meeting called back to order. ITEM i#9: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF R-4 WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR TUMBLE CREEK SUBDIVISION, X92 LOTS BY ARNOLD STUHP-LEFIELD: Kingsford: I will open the Public Hearing and invite the owner• or his designee to speak first. Arnold Stubblefield, 641 Franklin Rd., Meridian, was sworn by the at t or^ney. ' ~/ggq/~X~J J ~ ~ Y _ -~ ~ ~~~~ ~ o JAMES E. BRUCE, President ~~ GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary Stephen T. Sherer Attorney at Law Sherer Law Offices 30 E. Franklin Road P.O. Box 31 Meridian, ID 83680 Re: Locust Grove Road Dear Mr. Sherer: R~~~~E~ F~'~1lf994 CITY ~~ :<~~:;i~DA~ February 12, 1994 Your letter to the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) of January 24, 1994 has been referred to me for response. Hopefully, I can answer some of your questions. Some of your statements have to do with land use decisions made by the City of Meridian which would be more appropriately addressed to the City. The improvement of Locust Grove from Fairview to McMillan is currently scheduled by the ACHD Five Year Work Program (FYWP) for construction to begin in FY 1998. Typically, problems in design, right-of-way acquisition often cause project schedules to slip one or more years from programmed dates. Whether or not sufficient funding and priority will be available at that time is questionable. The segment from McMillan to Chinden is not programmed for improvement in the current FYWP. The Meridian Comprehensive Plan, updated and adopted in 1993, designates Locust Grove Road ( and most other section line roads ) as an arterial roadway, including the extension of Locust Grove over I-84 to Overland to serve the part of Meridian rapidly expanding in that area. The purpose of arterial roadways is to carry traffic from "collector" roadways, such as Chateau Drive, to major traffic generators/destinations or arterials of greater capacity, such as Fairview Avenue, Eagle Road (State Highway 55), or the Interstate Highway System. All of the rapidly growing subdivisions in the area you discuss have minor and collector streets feeding traffic onto the arterials such as Locust Grove, Ustick and Meridian roads. Some of Locust Grove has already been improved to minimal arterial standard ( four lanes ) along the subdivisions a short distance north of Fairview. It seems that the rapid growth in the area north of Fairview demands that the narrow part of Locust Grove be widened from its current two lane standard without sidewalks to at least a three lane collector standard with adequate sidewalks for pedestrians to be able to use more safely. Although conclusive ada county highway district 318 East 37th Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 • • traffic planning studies are usually not conducted until shortly before the design of the new roadway is begun, the basic premise of the Highway District staff and Meridian's Transportation Task Force is that about every section line road in northern Ada County will ultimately have to be widened to five lanes (four through traffic lanes and a two-way left turn lane). It is also our premise that the right-of-way for the ultimate roadway section should be acquired along these section line roads as subdivisions and non- residential development is occurring to avoid later disruptions to residents/users and higher acquisition costs. With regard to schools, it seems that many, if not most, schools in Ada County are located with close proximity to collector or arterial roadways. I have to presume that is done by the school districts deliberately, since the roads are there first in almost every situation. With the Meridian School District school bus maintenance/parking facility located on Locust Grove Road, it becomes a primary route for their dispersal and return each day. An advantage to the location of schools on collectors and arterials is that they have wider sidewalks for use by school children and other pedestrians. Your statements about Eagle Road and Meridian Road are accurate. Eagle Road is a State Highway and is currently scheduled for widening from Fairview to Chinden within the next three or four years. Meridian Road is only a three lane roadway, not five as you said, except near I-84. That may be the same width standard that Locust Grove is initially constructed, but the amount of growth in that area indicated to me that three lanes will not accommodate the traffic that this area will generate over the 20 to 30 years that we expect our roadways to last before they have to be rebuilt. As I stated above, most planners in the area believe that all the section line roads in the Meridian/Boise area will ultimately become five lane roadways. The actual determination of the number of lanes to be constructed in a given improvement project is not made until the necessary traffic planning studies are undertaken immediately prior to the project design. During the progress of these planning studies, much information is gathered with respect to existing vehicular and pedestrian traffic, the 20-year forecast traffic, existing and planned (by the City's Comprehensive Plan) development. Public information meetings are then held to review this information and to solicit opinion as to appropriate solutions to be undertaken. While the process is not without its problems, it has served well to arrive at the best alternative to be constructed, or not constructed in some cases. Your displeasure at the likelihood of Locust Grove widening is noted. Unfortunately, I probably cannot do anything to make your displeasure go away but I do hope to provide you with the most accurate information we have available and to acquaint you with some of the problems that public agencies have in coping with growth. The rate of growth that the area is currently experiencing obviously makes the problem of heavier traffic more obvious to the citizens of the County while it is more difficult to build roads D • fast enough to keep up. • ACHD recognizes that building roads is not the only answer. Better and more efficient transit systems will also be necessary in the future to handle the traffic that will ultimately develop. Unfortunately, land is not being developed densely enough in the area to financially support a good transit system, nor (apparently) are the traffic problems bad enough to make people get out of their automobiles. ACHD is working with major employers all over the County to promote carpooling, ridesharing and use of available bus routes. Our Ridesharing staff (two persons) do computer match-ups of employee addresses to let employees know who lives in their area and could rideshare with them, and other outreach efforts to discourage the use of automobiles by single occupants. Please feel free to continue to let us know of your opinions regarding the roadway system in Ada County. We value your opinion even if it may be unfavorable at times. Sincerely, •~ ~ . ~~ arry~~,~Sale, Supervisor Development Services Division cc: Chron Project File Mayor Grant Kingsford Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Meridian Transportation Task Force Traffic Services Engineering Services Director Commissioners 1 s03 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 836s1-439s FAX # 208-888-6201 3 February 1994 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 Jim Merkle SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Hubble Engineering, Inc. Boise 34s-2431 9550 Bethel Court Boise, Idaho .83709 Re: Milks Lateral RelocationJSummerfield Subdivision No. 1 Dear Jim: The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has completed the review of the Milks Lateral relocation off Ustick Road. The relocation was caught after the fact. If the pipe line is laid correctly, I believe that the District will be adequately protected. The plans show that you have about 30-inches of cover over this pipe line. The requirements of the District are that no berm or landscaping be placed over a pipe line. The District requires that a box be placed every 200 feet within a pipe line. In this particular case, the boxes are marginal. It was agreed that boxes could be installed every 250 feet. The boxes should be a minimum of five feet square (inside dimensions). The District will need an agreement for the relocation. Please contact Andy Harrington at 342-4591 and instruct him to prepare a License Agreement. We will need a new legal description for the relocated lateral. A description of the abandoned section is to be attached on a separate page. Please feel free to contact me if further discussion is required. Sincerely, John P. Anderson District Water Superintendent pc: Each Director Secretary of the Board Andy Harrington J~o~~h Sharp SLY of Meridian Ada County Bill Henson Rider 2 File APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS • 40.000 • • '`' ~`~ RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. ~ 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 2081322-8992 ^ Fax 208/378-0329 9y0 SURVEy~Q, February 3, 1994 - ~~ Mr. Wayne Forrey City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Summerfield Subdivision Neighbor/Client Meeting -Date: 2-1-94 Dear Wayne: ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ This is to follow up and summarize our meeting regarding the issues related to open space and soccer area for the Summerfield Subdivision. Gary Voigt will direct Hubble Engineering to lay out a 150' x 150' soccer practice area over Lots 11 and 12, Block 8 and onto ground that will eventually be Phase 3. This entire area will be developed in Phase 1. However, the portion outside Phase 1 will be platted as common area when that future phase is platted. Mike Donahue (neighbor who attended the meeting) is to get back with Hubble Engineering regarding adequate dimensions for soccer field and practice area on 2-2-94. On another matter, the City of Meridian will process the application for Summerfield No. 2 final plat and the developer will address the school district issue at the council meeting. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, James C. Merkle, P.E. JCM/bh/633.1tr cc: Gary Voigt .~ ~- s MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL SERT. 7, 1993 PAGE 5 refund your money personal feeling is time. without doing it far ever^yone else. My that we have to stand by o+ar policy at this The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Yerrington to deny the refund of double payments. Motion Carried: A11 Yea: ITEM #,c': REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL FEES: BY BOB GLENN, GLENN ELECTRIC: Handles in above testimony. .Ianice will make contact with Mr. Glenn and resolve this. ITEM #3: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING T^ R-4 WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION BY USTICK 4P1, RAYMOND ARTE AND VIENNA VAUGHN, TRUSTEE: Kingsford: Before we do tt-iis I would ask the Counselor to make a clarification with regard to a statement that was made by one of the Councilman with regard to the Land Use Planning Act and hoar it deals with the 199 amendment. Welcomed David Bivins, District 14 Representative. Crookston: The comment came up at the last meeting when the hearing was held on Summerfield Subdivision about not getting - the City thougFit that we might need on approvals for subdivisions in 199 State Legislature amended the Local Planning Act. That i s the act that requires the City' s, County' s to adopt a Comprehensive Plan, requires them if they so deem it, to iro accordance to that plan, to adopt a zoning ordinance and a subdivision or^dinance, an ordinance far special uses. In 199 the Legislature amended .that act giving the City's various authorities treat relate to impacts that a subdivision creates because of it's development an other local ,jurisdictions. That may be an ii^rigation district andlor a school district. In the purpose statement of the local planning act it says to allow local school districts to participate in the community planning and dewelopment process so as to address public school needs and impacts an an on-going basis. That's basically stating that the schools haws the right to a lot more input into a City's MER I D I Ald C I TY COUtUC I L SEPT. 7, 1993 PAGE ~ ~, Comprehensive Plan than they have ever had. In the play-ning duties section, it says school facilities and transportation is one of the planning ideas that have to be addressed and it says an analysis of public school capacity and transportation considerations associated with future development. They amended the zoning ordinance, it states particular consideration shall be given to the effects of any proposed zone change upon the delivery of services by any school district within the planning .jurisdiction. Also, if the request for a acne change is not in accot^darice with the adopted plan ar wa~~ld result in demonstrable adverse impacts upon the delivery of set^vices by the Schaal districts, the request shall be submitted to the Planning and .~.oning Commission, which shall recommend and the govet^ning hoard, which in this case is the City Council, may adopt of reject an amendment to the plan. I view tt-at as requiring same evidence from the Schaal as to the adverse impact that they fot^esee and would came about as a result of that development. There's another section an special uses, which I don't think are pei^tinent in this case. In the stat~~te that deals with subdivision ordinances, it says each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the affects of subdivision development on the ability of the school districts to delivey^ services without compromising quality of service, delivery to current residents, ar imposing s~ibstantial additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the proposed s-.~bdivision. I think what that's telling the City's, in addition also telling the school districts that ti--ey are going to have to prepare theiT^ analysis of that subdivision and the affect it's going to have. The Oz^dinance is passed by the City but the City needs help from the school district as to haw mitigation is determined. The City, what they've done is I think not a had idea, they have imposed same cooperation between the school districts and the City's sa that new growth is better handled by the schools. Stressed mare communication between the schools and the City. My analysis is that the City needs evidence from the school on the affect of a s ubdivision that the affect of a subdivision woa~ld have on providing school services and what measures are necessary so that the school can continue to provide services without imposing substantial additional cost of curl^ent residents. ftingsford: One clarification, a that the schools could say we shut tr-.te. They wo~~ld have to provide if we had a finding that said that provide water. Would have to have impact the schools. statement was made last time off gi^owth is not necessarily the evidence ,just as we would the wells were not adequate to evidence to show how it wo-.eld j tMER I D I Ahl C I TY COUNG I L SEPT. 7, 1993 PAGE 7 Don H~~bble: We were told that there might be a concern about the school district and Mr. Voigt was pi^epared to offer whatever assistance needed to be offered in order to help provide a site for that school. Kingsford: I assume he's acceptable to a development agreement to that effect. Tolsma: Would this be an emir^e school site or .,just partial school site or? Kingsford: I think that's something he would be negotiating with the school district. For the record then, the applicant is willing to negotiate with the school district on a school site. Hubble: Correct. Kingsford: Any questions for Mr. Hubble? Giesler: If that is the case what would happen to the impact fees that they agt^ee to? Kingsford: That would be subject to whatever agreement they have with the school district. {Explanation given - see tape) The Motion was made by Giesler^ and seconded by Yerrington to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for request for annexation and coning to R-4 with preliminary plat for Arte and Vaugtm. Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Tolsma - Yea; Motion Carried: All Yea: Giesler - Yea; Cor^rie - Yea; ITEM #~4: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING TO R-B WITH PRELIMINARY pLAT FOR CHAMBERLAIN E5TATE5 BY KEVIN HOWELL: The Motion was made by Yerrington and seconded by Cot^rie to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on the annexation and coning to R-8 with preliminary plat for• Chamberlain Estates. Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Giesler - Yea; Corrie Yea; Tolsma - Yea; DATE: ~~ MERIDIAN CITY ~INCIL AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 1V APPLICANT: ~ 8 ,~ AGENCY COMMENTS: MERIDIAN POLICE - MERIDIAN FIRE DEPT. - MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER - MERIDIAN ATTORNEY - MERIDIAN POST OFFICE - MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT - MERIDIAN BUILDING DEPT. - ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT - ADA STREET NAME COMMITTEE - CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH - NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATIDN - SETTLERS IRRIGATION - IDAHO POWER - US WEST - INTERMOUNTAIN GAS - BUREAU OF RECLAMATION - MERIDIAN C I TY ATTORNEY -~~ ~ Tr'~'vd~vo~5 0~ Pack ~ ~pnc~usion5 o~C l Qw~t MERIDIAN PLANNING DIRECTOR - OTHER COMMENTS: • ~ ORIGINAL BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL U$TICR 40 ANNEBATION AND ZONING SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M. , ADA COUNTY, IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for consideration on August 17, 1993, at the hour of.7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the City Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant appearing through his engineer, Don Hubble, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for August 17, 1993 the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the August 17, 1993 hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 1 2. That the property included in the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this reference is incorporated herein; that the property is approximately 69.47 acres in size; it is located at the Northeast corner of Ustick Road and Locust Grove Road Intersection. 3. That the property is presently zoned by Ada County RT (Rural Transition) and the proposed use would be for R-4 Residential type development and the Applicant has submitted an application for subdivision approval. 4. The general area surrounding the property is used agriculturally and residentially. 5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits. 6. The Applicant is not owner of record of the property, but the owners of record have consented to the annexation. 7. That the property included in the annexation and zoning application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 8. That the entire parcel of ground is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. That the Application requests that the parcel be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential; that the present use of the property is for agriculture; that the applicant indicated that the intended development of the property is for an R-4 type subdivision and in the subdivision Application stated the density would be approximately 3.0 dwelling units per acre, the smallest density FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 2 • being 2.8 units per acre, and at the City Council hearing stated that the minimum square footage would be 1,500 square feet for single level houses and 1,800 square feet for double level houses. 10. There were property owners in the immediate area that submitted written comment and owners that testified at the City Council Hearing objecting to the application; that 337 people signed petitions that were submitted at the City Council Hearing stating that they desired the annexation be denied; that several people submitted written comment which can be summarized as follows as set forth next to the person's name that submitted the written comment, to wit: Paul and Darlene Sprague - water problems will occur. Gale L. Corr - water problems, schools overcrowding, require at least 12,000 sq.ft. lots. Jennifer M. Beaulieu - school overcrowding. Cynthia Ann Lee - schools, water, wants one acre lots. Diane Beaulieu - schools, water, traffic, rural vs. urban. Jim Moyer - water, traffic, lot size and house size too small. Carolyn Wagnild - one house per acre, schools, water supply, require impact fees. Rod and Diane Lowe - schools, traffic, no park or recreational facilities, water, crime, lots too small, stress on utilities. Tammy Sorensen - schools, traffic. V. L. Hale - traffic, no common areas, water, school problem should not be placed on taxpayers, wants one acre lots. V. L. Holladay - just deny. Michelle L. Whipple - school, police & fire. Kathleen A. Brown - schools, water, wants one acre lots, public service, wants development near City limits. Stephen T. Sherer - water, houses too small, two to three acre parcels desired, schools. David M. McGillivary - water, impact fees, traffic. Cathy Peterson - traffic, schools, water. That testimony from the Public Hearing reflected the following concerns: Traffic, horses and kids do not mix, density too high, schools FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 3 • overburdened, make development pay for schools, water effected, higher taxes, traffic, develop closer to City, not responsible for City to change zoning that drastically from what it is now, have one or one-half acre lots, stay as agriculture, opposed to density, leave as country setting. 11. That the property is in the NORTH CURVE NEIGHBORHOOD as set forth in Policy Diagram in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan; that under Housing Development on page 25 and 26 of the Comprehensive Plan property inside the Urban Service Planning Area may be developed at greater densities than one dwelling unit per acre. 12. That in the Rural Area section of the Comprehensive Plan it does state that land in agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity until it is no longer economical to exclude orderly growth and development to maintain agricultural pursuits. 13. That Meridian has, and is, experiencing a population increase; that there are pressures on land previously used for agricultural uses to be developed into residential subdivision lots. 14. That the property can be serviced with City water and sewer. 15. The Meridian School District submitted comment and such is incorporated herein as if set forth in full; its comment was that there is no excess capacity in the schools of the District and that residents of the new subdivision could not be assured of attending the neighborhood schools; the School District asked for support for a development fee or a transfer fee to help offset the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 4 • costs of building additional schools. 16. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code, relating to subdivision ordinances, stated as follows: "Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects of subdivision development on the ability of political subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to deliver services without compromising quality of service delivery to current residents or imposing substantial additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the proposed subdivision."; that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in population that is occurring and with its impact on the City being able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School District which provide school service to current and future residents of the City; that the City knows that the increase in population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to provide for school services to current and future students. 17. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which if possible would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in the City, because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 5 • safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian. 18. That the R-4, Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 3 as follows: (R-4) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT: The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low density single-family dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominantly residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan or the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non- residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four ( 4 ) dwellings units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian. 19. That the Applicant's representative stated that the single level homes would have a minimum size of 1,500 square feet and that double level homes would have a minimum of 1,800 square feet, that he would commit to a well site; that he would have berms and landscaping on the entrances, and he stated that there was open space, planned bike paths, and a soccer field; that there was 3 acres of open space; that homes would have a minimum price of $130,000.00; that the density would be three lots to the acre; he also stated that the developer would participate in impact or transfer fees. 20. That Section 11-9-605 C states as follows: "Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas; the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide." 21. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows: "Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to screen the view from residential FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 6 • properties, such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right of way or utility easement;" 22. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows: "Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of the subdivision;" 23. That Section 11-9-605 K states as follows: "The extent and location of lands designed for linear open space corridors should be determined by natural features and, to lesser extent, by man-made features such as utility easements, transportation rights of way or water rights of way. Landscaping, screening or lineal open space corridors may be required for the protection of residential properties from adjacent arterial streets, waterways, railroad rights of way or other features. As improved areas (landscaped), semi- improved areas (a landscaped pathway only), or unimproved areas (left in a natural state), linear open space corridors serve: 1. To preserve openness; 2. To interconnect park and open space systems within rights of way for trails, walkways, bicycle ways; 3. To play a major role in conserving area scenic and natural value, especially waterways, drainages and natural habitat; 4. To buffer more intensive adjacent urban land uses; 5. To enhance local identification within the area due to the internal, linkages; and 6. To link residential neighborhoods,. park areas and recreation facilities. 24. That Section 11-9-605 L states as follows: Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new developments as part of the public right of way or as separate easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is distinct and separate from the automobile) can be provided throughout the City Urban Service Planning Area. The Commission and Council shall consider the Bicycle-Pedestrian FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 7 • Design Manual for Ada County (as prepared by Ada County Highway District) when reviewing bicycle and pedestrian pathway provisions within developments. 25. That proper notice was given as required by law and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission were given and followed. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met; including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that exercise of the City's annexation authority is a Legislative function. 3. That the Planning and Zoning Commission has judged this annexation and zoning application under Section 50-222, Idaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice. 4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been complied with. 5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 8 • existing within the City and State. 6. That the land within the proposed annexation is contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian, and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation. 7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the Applicant, G.L. Voigt, with the consent of the record owners, and the annexation is not upon the initiation of the City of Meridian. 8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land. 9. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616 which pertains to development time schedules and requirements and 11-9-605 M, Piping of Ditches; that the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer; that the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance; that, as a condition of annexation the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, R, L and the comments of the Planning Director, Wayne Forney, relating to the lack of adequate recreation facilities and that land set aside for a future park would be desirable, that the City is in need of land set-asides for future public service use, that a school site was not reserved and the subdivision, when developed totally, would FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 9 • • contribute approximately 260 children to the School District; that the development agreement shall also require donation of a well lot of 100' x 100'; that the development agreement shall, as a condition of annexation, require that the Applicant, or if required, any assigns, heirs, executors or personal representatives, pay, when required, any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City; that there shall be no annexation until the requirements of this paragraph are met or, if necessary, the property shall be subject to de-annexation and loss of City services, if the requirements of this paragraph are not met. 10. That proper and adequate access to the property is available and will have to be maintained. 11. That since the Applicant's property is in the NORTH CURVE NEIGHBORHOOD of the Comprehensive Plan, the annexation and zoning Application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and does not conflict with the Rural Areas policies. 12. It is concluded that the development, with a density of 3.00 dwellings units per acre, is an R-4 type development and the property should be zoned in that fashion, upon meeting the requirements of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. It is noted that some of the lots in the preliminary plat that were filed do not meet the R-4 standards. 13. Therefore, based on the Application, the testimony and evidence, these Findings of Fact and Conclusions, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, including the minimum house size represented of 1,500 square feet for single level homes and FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 10 • 1,800 square feet for double level homes, it is ultimately concluded that Applicant's property should be annexed and zoned R- 4; that the conditions should be those stated above and upon issuance of final platting; that such annexation would be orderly development and reasonable if the conditions are met; that the property shall be subject to de-annexation if the requirements of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are not met. 13. That all ditches, canals, and waterways required to be tiled by City Ordinance shall be tiled as a condition of annexation and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de-annexation. 14. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the annexation and zoning or R-4, Residential would be in the best interest of the City of Meridian. 15. That if the conditions of approval are not met the property shall be subject to de-annexation. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian City Council hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. ROLL CALL COUNCILMAN RON TOLSMA COUNCILMAN BOB CORRIE COUNCILMAN BOB GIESLER COUNCILMAN MAX YERRINGTON GRANT P. RINGSFORD (TIE BREAKER) VOTED MOTION: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 11 • APPROVED: '~~~ DISAPPROVED: DECISION AND RECOI~IIKENDATION The Meridian City Council hereby decides they approve the annexation and zoning as stated above in the Conclusions of Law for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and that if the conditions are not met that the property be de-annexed. MOTION: APPROVED: / DISAPPROVED: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 12 DATE: ,~-~° ~Q '~ MERIDIAN ~- CITY C~(VCIL AGE~lDA ITEM NUMBE.t,_c APPLICANT: ~ -~' (~ AGENCY COMMENTS: MERIDIAN POLICE - ~d Pr~b~~ MERIDIAN FIRE DEPT. - 1~,,® `p r'e~b ~ vh MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER - ~- ~~lau'~-d Cpw~w•~.v~'t'g ` MERIDIAN ATTORNEY - MERIDIAN POST OFFICE - MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT -See.. 1~~~C..Ino..d ~°~^i°'~'~^'~3 MERIDIAN BUILDING DEPT. - ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT -~ca~ ~~Cac~ ~1Mw•~~'•~~ ADA STREET NAME COMMITTEE - CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH - S~ 1A~~4ao~ed~ CQr"`"''iK~ NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION - ~-~C~C~'~ CO1~`~'~`"'~"~`~S SETTLERS IRRIGATION - 52~, ~} ~RC~ epw~.w~.t-v~'~ S IDAHO POWER - ~ ~a.c~c{ C.A1M.w•.ev~.~-S US WEST - INTERMOUNTAIN GAS - BUREAU OF RECLAMATION - MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY -~Q'R~IC~d ~~F~-nd~wgS ~F~ ~ Ck~~~S o~ ll~N MERIDIAN PLANNING DIRECTOR - OTHER CDMMENTS: _ ~~~rm~ ~v~.,.t<~-da ~~~ JUN 0 31993 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS couNCILMEN WAYNES.FORREY,AICP,CIIyCterk Treasurer JANICE CiASS CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA , ROBERTaIESLER BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE O. CROOKSTON, JR., Attamey 33 EAST IDAHO ~ MAx YERRINOroN ROBERT D. CORRIE JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chlel MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Chairman Zonlnq b Pianninq BILL CiORDON, Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 JIM JOHNSON GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 Centennial Coordinator GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRiZZI Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIE5 FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITV OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridia~~II Planning and Zoning9 Commission, may we have your answer by: ~r I~In I I `Y t . v1 ~ L.•1. I Q ~1?S ~ _'ll1rA ~, r/-n .~-0.,~., s ,,~, -~ TRANSMITTAL DATE : ~[LY1~ -' 14lggZJ (+ HEARING DATE : ~Tt~NP ~, ~~~ RE[ 8Y. LOCATION OF PROPERTY;. ©R., PROJECT':~iTj~ Z'ylti iZ'tC 8.~1. 1~.~uV1~ ~t E C'o r+n Qr a ~ ~ ~as~~ c~c. ar~c~ E~ t~.~,~~-~- Q.Y~~ . T ~~cs. ~ ~-to~n We require a permanent 10-foot wide public utilities easement along all lots adjacent to a road right-of-wa.y dedicated to public or private use. Tim Adams Idaho Power 322-2047 ~"~~nS b~3-q3 SE~LERS' IRRIGATION DIST~T P.O. BOX 7571 • BOISE, IDAHO 83707 PHONE 344-2471 ~~~~yvE~ JUN 0 8 1993 CITY ®F 1ME1~iD1~ June 7, 1993 Wayne Forrey City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Summerfield Subdivision Dear Mr. Forrey: The above referenced subdivision lies within the Settlers Irrigation District and as such is required to include an irrigation delivery system to provide the homeowners in the subdivision access to their irrigation water. The water for this subdivision is delivered through the Leighton Lateral of the Settlers canal so you will need to contact Don Smitchger for any changes which might impact that lateral Isis address is 3890 E Ustick Road, Meridian, Idaho 83642. If you have any questions regarding this, please phone me at 343-5271. Sincerely, ~~ Troy L. pshaw, Manager Settlers Irrigation District REVIEW SHEET CENTRAL • •~ DISTRICT C HEALTI~ DEPARTMENT Retum to: ^ BOISe ^ Eagle ^ Garden City Meridian ^ Kuna ^ acz ~~~~~~~ J0~ 0 9 1993 Rezone # ~ ~~ SERI®lt~1V Con ' Tonal Use # Prelimina FinaVShort Plat ~~i~~r~ :e ~~~ rdosi~ ^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal. ^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. ^ 3. Spec'rfic knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewge disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of ^ high seasonal ground water ^ sol'~d lava from original grade ^ 6. W~ n approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: 2 feet ^ 4 feet 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: Central sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water well ^ Interim sewage ~ Central water ^ Individual sewage ^ Individual water `~- 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ~- Central sewage ^ Community sewage system^ Community water ^ Sewage dry lines ~ Central water 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probeim. ^ 14. This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any: ^ Food establishment ^ Swimming pools or spas ^ Beverage establishment ^ Grocery store ^ 13. ^ Child Care Center DATE: ~ 7~~ /' Reviewed by: ~~ CDHD 10-91 rcb HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE LASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208)888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chalnnen Zoning & Planning JIMJOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI MEMORAWDUM TO: Mayor, Council, Planning an~ ing Commission FROM: Wayne S. Forrey, AICP DATE: June 3, 1993 RE: Summerfield Subdivisiorl„w,,-~~==Anr,>6,~„~cation with a Preliminary Plat $.~ ~~ ~f ~ :~ This 200 lot subdi ~~'io .",N i w ~ in t~#~L~,§, USPA boundary. This ~`~~ .~. project does not ~ h the fol~owi:>•i'~gr°K~oals and policies of the current Comprii~si 'e Plan. ""wy Goal / Pol icy ,~'~ "M•.~, ,;~ ;~;,~: a of, ~Co , 1 fiance J s ~~ ,. a , Goal 6 ~~~F~'t} ~~ ~~.ac of adeq`~It a recreation ,t ~ 1~ , facilities for ner;ghborhood. Land t~ ~~~:K~ set aside fors `:. f~t~~re park use may be desirable. Goal 7 k,'';~ ~ Providing Mull pt~Ellic services to ,u ., ac~•a~nmodat,~, the ~i~^oJected needs of ~, r;~ N W 'R ~~ "`~"~~is su~i~viaion.. `may be difficult. ~``S:k° The City is ~f~i the process of ~ "' evaluating:. fu~,Yre public service levels in 't~r~'` area to accommodate ~~'o~e~z~d needs. Land set aside t''~ ~ftt~ctre public service use •r 1~~~I~ri'"this subdivision could help increase future public service capability. School Policy 3 School site not reserved in advance of development. This subdivision will contribute 260 students to District #2. Applicant needs to coordinate development plans with school capacity planning. Based on these conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan, this proposal could be denied or tabled to allow the applicant sufficient time to reconsider development features and work with City and School officials to update the Comprehensive Plan and achieve community goals. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS COUNCILMEN WAYNES.FORREY,AICP,CItyClerk JANICE GASS Treasurer CITY OF MERIDIAl~T A R , ROBERTGESLER BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNEG.CROOKSTON,JR.,Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MAXYERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE JOHN SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Chairman Zoning & Planning BILL GORDON, Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 JIM JOHNSON GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 Centennial Coordinator GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor June 7, 1993 T0: MAYOR - COUNCIL - PLANNING & ZONING FROM : GARY SMITH, P . E . ~,~~~, RE: SUMMERFIELD SUBD. (ANNEX. - ZONING - PRELIM. PLAT) I have reviewed tl~~""`~~ mi~ta~~nd~~~,~ the following comments: ~~ x 1. This pro . `~ty .. ~ contiguous t®k=w ~~h~sant Pointe Subd . at a point. ~ rdinance for annex~ti~ h~v"'~pf Pheasant Pointe was directe tie drawn b the City ~ cc:~l on June 1, 1993. 2. Stree ~ names, rig t o~ w wi"dth~ and s~reet section need to be shin . ~K ~~ 3. A cul~~~~~ ir,l~cs~2 a~rs~ to~e~cceed~x50 feet and if left ~. willquire a vari 4. All l~s, exc ~ those on a c~ldesac mrequire an 80 foot street`,"'#~ront ,x~ ~ls~~~'s "`~equ"x'e a minimum 40 foot chord ~`'=~~imen ion. Numerous lots <N~~do not meet these requirel~~ts 5 . Show bench k e ere a ..,~; ttie' ~~°contour 1 i nes shown . I s a~. ~: w~ there no cont°~~~~'~o t .' w ease,~~~~port i on of this plat? 6. The sewer line exiting `~~t-e subdivision is not in an acceptable position. It needs to be in a roadway. A 12 inch diameter water line fs needed in Ustick and Locust Grove Rd. 7. Our water master plan requires a City well be situated near this intersection of Ustick and Locust Grove Road. It would be appropriate to locate a 100~x100~ well lot in this subdivision. 8. The lengths of Blocks 7 and 9 exceed the ordinance maximum of 1000 feet. A variance is needed. 9. A stub road should be shown into the property to the north. 10. House sizes shown in the application are 1350 S.F. The ordinance requires a minimum 1400 S.F., not including garage. C~ • 11. The drawing needs the signed seal of a land surveyor. 12. A turn-a-round needs to be shown at the end of the stub road at the east boundary. 13. Lot 26 - Block 4 has an access problem because of the landscaped island. I have made a similar comment on Chamberlain Estates and Cougar Creek Subd. 14. Water lines are to be located 12 feet north and east of street centerline. 15. What is the status of irrigation and drainage ditches crossing this property? What is the piping layout? 16. Who maintains the storm drain system outside the public right of way? I need a letter from the responsible agency, whomever it may be. 17. The continued processing of this proposal is subject to our analysis of our existing water system to provide domestic water and fire flow service. 18. This preliminary plat should be resubmitted to me with all of the above items addressed. • June 16, 1993 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Summerfield Subdivision Dear Councilmen: ~~~~~~~~ J U N ~ ~ 193 CfTV C~ ~~~~if~fA-~I We have reviewd a copy of the letter from Dan Mabe, Superintendent of Meridian School District, dated June 3, 1993, regarding the proposed Summerfield Subdivision. In addition to the inability of the school to handle additional students in the area of the proposed subdivision has experienced a huge influx of new homes and heavy traffic on N. Locust Grove and Ustick and roads and traffic signals have not been updated for at least 25 years. Its inconceviable to us how this area can carry the additional traffic this subdivision will add to this area. We are also concerned about our water supply, as all the houses in this area are dependant on individual wells. We also feel the Meridian Fire Department and Emergancy Medical Service are inadequate to cover more subdivisions at this time. We would like to see the developers provide more parks and recreation areas if their subdivions are aloud to be built. We would like to see this development signals and school facilities could be for improvements. Sincerely, T625 Star Lane Meridian, Idaho 83642 denied until road, traffic addressed and acted upon SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Bob L. Haley CDR ExCEt` DEP Dan Mabe, Finan eD& Administration ~y~ DIR ~Cm Carberry, Secondary Christine Donnell, Personnel ~~~r~~ ~ Darlene Fulwood, Elementary Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • PHONE (208)888-6701 2 Q ~~ June 3, 1993 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Summerfield Subdivision Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Summerfield Subdivision. This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is beyond capacity. The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a need for additional school construction. We ask your support for a development fee statute on new home construction or a real estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we ask that additional residential development be denied. Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school as it may be necessary to bus students to available classrooms across the district. We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike paths and safe pedestrian access. Sincerely, Dan Mabe, Deputy Superintendent DM:gr • ~~ =;a~~iizE~~ ~ ~~o~, ~~~-~Z~ ~ I/ ~ ~ ~JjJ ~ X11. 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 Phones: Area Code 208 Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 Re: Preliminary Plat/Annexation and Zoning Raymond Ante, Ustick 40 Partnership, & Vienna Vaughn, Trustee Commissioners: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Milks Lateral courses along the south boundary of this project. The right-of-way of the Milks Lateral is 30 feet: 15 feet from the center each way. See Idaho Code 42-1208--RIGHTS-OF-WAY NOT SUBJECT TO ADVERSE POSSESSION. The developer must contact John Anderson or Bill Henson at Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, 466-0663 or 345-2431, for approval before any encroachment or change of right-of-way occurs. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. Municipal surface drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. ~~~~~ "Bill Henson Foreman ~~ ~~,,~~ ~,~~~ ~ ~r==~~ _,., , ~~~ ~~ ~~,.rs~ ~vS~a~~ 1-a~~~~ c3~ ~c~~~~r bah. -,~~~ah ~Flai~ L~ii~ 1~~3ui4'B~Y iPd ~C~~Ffl~54~.^= t^I4v:iZ pc: District Water Superintendent Y~~ e~~~@~o-tl~~a ~,~~ ~o~~{e a~~c~yits~~~ File - office ~~~.~~,®~ ~~~ 1~ ~n`L~~~©~• File -shop - __ w ~'= - ~- =.r-~ ~,~ ~ - _ ~,ur~,,~ ~~ \o,~Z' r~l ~J ~~ Boas I ,~~, r - ~~, ~_- s~ E ~~~ ~°~_ ~_: ~ _ I_"~-- ~- ~ __ - ` ~~, ~.-~; n ~, ` --~ -- ~~ ,~°~ ` . ~~ ', y ,~~~ _ ~-~ j'. _ APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 9 June-1993 • . ~~% 0 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION USTICK 40 ANNEBATION AND ZONING SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO MERIDIAN. IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for consideration ~n June 8, 1993 at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Planning and Zoning Commission having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant appearing along with Dan Torfin, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for June 8, 1993 the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the June 8, 1993 hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 1 • 2. That the property included in the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this reference is incorporated herein; that the property is approximately 69.47 acres in size; it is located at the Northeast corner of Ustick Road and Locust Grove Road Intersection. 3. That the property is presently zoned by Ada County RT (Rural Transition) and the proposed use would be for R-4 Residential type development and the Applicant has submitted an application for subdivision approval. 4. The general area surrounding the property is used agriculturally and residentially. 5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits. 6. The Applicant is the owner of record of the property. 7. That the property included in the annexation and zoning application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 8. That the entire parcel of ground is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. That the Application requests that the parcel be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential; that the present use of the property is for agriculture; that the applicant indicated that the intended development of the property-is for a~ R-4 type subdivision and in the subdivision Application stated the density would be approximately 3.0 dwelling units per acre, the smallest density being 2.8 units per acre, and that the square footage requirement FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 2 • • of 1,500 square feet for the R-4 District would be met. 10. There were property owners in the immediate area that testified objecting to the application; that Vern Alman, a neighbor to the south across Ustick is concerned about the traffic increase on Ustick, overcrowding of schools and the extra burden upon the fire department; Herb Endicott had concerns over the well impact; Herb Dalwrimple had questions and concerns over the annexation since the City is questioning the additional city services that would be required and he had concerns over storm drainage; Tom Davis owner of property to the east wants to see a six foot chain length fence put up as a retaining fence; Beverly Donough desired to have this matter continued until the Comprehensive Plan was updated and she had concerns over the impact on the schools and the one acre lots to the north, she also submitted a Petition; Craig Groves spoke in support of Mr. Voigt; he favors a transfer fee as a local option; Peggy Moyer, an owner in Paradise Subdivision, had concerns over the impact and overcrowding of the schools, she would also like to see the roads widened before development, she also desired that this matter be continued until the Comprehensive Plan was updated; that Leon Johnson wants the land widened on Locust Grove and has concerns and questions over the annexation; Diane Beaulieu does not want to see a suburbia area for Meridian; and Jim Hollister owns property directly north of the proposed subdivision and he had no comment on the access to his property. 11. That the property is in the NORTH CURVE NEIGHBORHOOD as set forth in Policy Diagram in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 3 that under Housing Development on page 25 and 26 of the Comprehensive Plan property inside the Urban Service Planning Area may be developed at greater densities than one dwelling unit per acre. 12. That in the Rural Area section of the Comprehensive Plan it does state that land in agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity until it is no longer economical to exclude orderly growth and development to maintain agricultural pursuits. 13. That Meridian has, and is, experiencing a population increase; that there are pressures on land previously used for agricultural uses to be developed into residential subdivision lots. 14. That the property can be serviced with City water and sewer. 15. The Meridian School District submitted comment and such is incorporated herein as if set forth in full; its comment was that there is no excess capacity in the schools of the District and that residents of the new subdivision could not be assured of attending the neighborhood schools; the School District asked for support for a development fee or a transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional schools. 16. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code, relating to subdivision ordinances, stated as follows: "Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 4 ~ ~ of subdivision development on the ability of political subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to deliver services without compromising quality of service delivery to current residents or imposing substantial additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the proposed subdivision."; that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in population that is occurring and with its impact on the City being able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School District which provide school service to current and future residents of the City; that the City knows that the increase in population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to provide for school services to current and future students. 17. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which if possible would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in the City, because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian. 18. That the R-4, Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 3 as follows: (R-4) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT: The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 5 • density single-family dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominantly residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan or the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non- residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four ( 4 ) dwellings units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian. 19. That the Applicant''s representative stated that the homes would have a minimum size of 1,500 square feet, that he would commit to a well site; that he would have berms and landscaping on the entrances, and he stated that there was no planned amenities within the subdivision for recreation but would implement if the City staff came up with a requirement. 20. That Section 11-9-605 C states as follows: "Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas; the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide." 21. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows: "Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to screen the view from residential properties, such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right of way or utility easement;" 22. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows: "Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of the subdivision;" 23. That Section 11-9-605 R states as follows: "The extent and location of lands designed for linear open space corridors should be determined by natural features and, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 6 • to lesser extent, by man-made features such as utility easements, transportation rights of way or water rights of way. Landscaping, screening or lineal open space corridors may be required for the protection of residential properties from adjacent arterial streets, waterways, railroad rights of way or other features. As improved areas (landscaped), semi- improved areas (a landscaped pathway only), or unimproved areas (left in a natural state), linear open space corridors serve: 1. To preserve openness; 2. To interconnect park and open space systems within rights of way for trails, walkways, bicycle ways; 3. To, play a major role in conserving area scenic and natural value, especially waterways, drainages and natural habitat; 4. To buffer more intensive adjacent urban land uses; 5. To enhance local identification within the area due to the internal, linkages; and 6. To link residential neighborhoods, park areas and recreation facilities. 24. That Section 11-9-605 L states as follows: Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new developments as part of the public right of way or as separate easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is distinct and separate from the automobile) can be provided throughout the City Urban Service Planning Area. The Commission and Counci]. shall consider the Bicycle-Pedestrian Design Manual for Ada County'(as prepared by Ada County Highway District) when reviewing bicycle and pedestrian pathway provisions within developments. 25. That proper notice was given as required by law and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission were given and followed. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 7 • Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met; including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that exercise of the City's annexation authority is a Legislative function. 3. That the Planning and Zoning Commission has judged this annexation and zoning application under Section 50-222, Idaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice. 4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been complied with. 5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 6. That the land within the proposed annexation is contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian, and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation. 7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the Applicant, G.L. Voigt, and the annexation is not upon the initiation of the City of Meridian. 8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 8 • legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land. 9. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616 which pertains to development time schedules and requirements and 11-9-605 M, Piping of Ditches; that the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer; that the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance; that, as a condition of annexation the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L and the comments of the Planning Director, Wayne Forrey, relating to the lack of adequate recreation facilities and that land set aside for a future park would be desirable, that the City is in need of land set-asides for future public service use, that a school site was not reserved and the subdivision, when developed totally, would contribute 260 children to the School District; that the development agreement shall, as a condition of annexation, require that the Applicant, or if required, any assigns, heirs, executors or personal representatives, pay, when required, any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City; that there shall be no annexation until the requirements of this paragraph are met or, if necessary, the property shall be subject to de-annexation and loss of City services, if the requirements of this paragraph are not FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 9 • met. • 10. That proper and adequate access to the property is available and will have to be maintained. 11. That since the Applicant's property is in the 1VORTH CURVE NEIGHBORHOOD of the Comprehensive Plan, the annexation and zoning Application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and does not conflict with the Rural Areas policies. 12. It is concluded that the development, with a density of 3.00 dwellings units per acre, is an R-4 type development and the property should be zoned in that fashion, upon meeting the requirements of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. It is noted that some of the lots in the preliminary plat that were filed do not meet the R-4 standards. 13. Therefore, based on the Application, the testimony and evidence, these Findings of Fact and Conclusions, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, including the minimum house size represented of 1,500 square feet, it is ultimately concluded that Applicant's property should be annexed and zoned R-4; that the conditions should be those stated above and upon issuance of final platting and other conditions to be explored at the City Council level; that such annexation would be orderly development and reasonable if the conditions are met; that the property shall be subject to de-annexation if the requirements of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are not met. 13. That all ditches, canals, and waterways required to be tiled by City Ordinance shall be tiled as a condition of annexation FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 10 • • and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de-annexation. 14. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the annexation and zoning or R-4, Residential would be in the best interest of the City of Meridian. 15. That if the conditions of approval are not met the property shall be subject to de-annexation. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER VOTED COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE VOTED (~~C~0. COMMISSIONER SHEARER VOTED~OI_ COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI VOTED ~,~o~ CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED~-~~''~- DECISION AND RECOI~IIaO;NDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning as stated above in the Conclusions of Law for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and that if the conditions are not met that the property be de-annexed. MOTION: APP O V R VED. DISAPPROVED: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 11 d • • ~~ R~~~ PETITION d~~~ JuN 2 ~ 19s3 Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Comm °~F ~~'1~r,~N Regarding: the proposed Summerfield Subdivision From: the following concerned citizens ^ Message: We ask that approval for the Sut~terfield Subdivision be denied. Our concerns include overcrowded schools and traffic. We feel that it is inappropriate to additionally overburden our schools. NAME AnnRF~~ ~ • • ~~' PETITION Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Regarding: the proposed Summerfield Subdivision From: the following concerned citizens Message: We ask that approval for the Summerfield Subdivision be denied. Our concerns include overcrowded schools and traffic. We feel that it is inappropriate to additionally overburden our schools. NAME ADDRESS ~~ a ~~f~,~t~ 1~9~n ~' ~l~ ~~~~ PETITION • Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Regarding: the proposed Summerfield Subdivision From: the following concerned citizens Message: We ask that approval for the Summerfield Subdivision be denied. Our concerns include overcrowded schools and traffic. We feel that it is inappropriate to additionally overburden our schools. ~ ,_ _ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ . ~ ~~ LI ~. ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~C ~~b4~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ /~~~r~ (1J o ~ / f~~ ~1" ~% /Gr~~ Go~~ <5 ~ ~ ~~~r Vi 'p..~r r~ y ~ss'~~~,~ ~~~7~1/~ \~~ .,. ~_ 1 "tn.n ~cn._ -L~ c r _ l_ . n ( A /1A n t T PETITION ~~~~ ~~~ Presented to : the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commi~~~o~.~ 1993 Regarding: the annexation and the zoning of the sec~i by North Locust Grove, McMillan Road, Eagle Road and Ustick Roa ~~ Message: We ask that the City of Meridian not annex the above described area. At the present time, this area is zoned RT (one home per 5 acresj. If annexed, we request that the area not be subdivided into parcels smaller than one acre; i.e., one home per acre. 1\" ~ ~ n ~.~ .~,a is a ~ ~ Gi ('~ ~/~ n .F/ ~. 1l ~ , ~A n 0 ~ o ~ 2 ~ ~. ~~/r~.~l1.~ e~ NIlMF! r rrnc+c.r PETITION ;r~ Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Regarding: the annexation and the zoning of the section bounded by North Locust Grove, McMillan Road, Eagle Road and Ustick Road Message: We ask that the City of Meridian not annex the above described area. At the present time, this area is zoned RT (one home per 5 acres). If annexed, we request that the area not be subdivided into parcels smaller than one acre; i.e., one home per acre. ~~ /~ • • PETITION Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Regarding: the annexation and the zoning of the section bounded by North Locust Grove, McMillan Road, Eagle Road and Ustick Road Message: We ask that the City of Meridian not annex the above described area. At the present time, this area is zoned RT (one home per 5 acres). If annexed, we request that the area not be subdivided into parcels smaller than one acre; i.e., one home per acre. NAME ADDRESS ~---r` Zo Z z Sf C ~, i'~Cr-.~C tea-. ~ ~3 6 g'Z_ ~~~ ~~ • • PETITION ~~G~ Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Regarding: Summerfield Subdivision ~. ~.~~ REGARDING SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION The Meridian City Council Meeting will be Friday, 7:30 pm, August 20, 1993 at the Meridian City Hall. Message: We ask that the City of Meridian table action on the Summerfield Subdivision until after September 10, 1993; in order to evaluate the subdivision against the policies of the new Comprehensive Plan. NAME a nr~~ z~ e e w • • PETITION ~~ Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Regarding: Summerfield Subdivision Message: We ask that the City of Meridian table action on the Summerfield Subdivision until after September 10, 1993; in order to evaluate the subdivision against the policies of the new Comprehensive Plan. ` AD SS V . ~ ~ ` °t `~ ~3 to ~~ 8 5 10 LS3~o~F~-- COUNCIL MEETING REGARDING SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION The Meridian City Council Meeting will be Friday, 7:30 pm, August 20, 1993 at the Meridian City Hall. ~ • • V PETITION ~t~ Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Regarding: the proposed Summerfield Subdivision From: the following concerned citizens Message: We ask that approval for the Summerfield Subdivision be denied. Our concerns include overcrowded schools and traffic. We feel that it is inappropriate to additionally overburden our schools. NAME ADDRESS ! ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ PETITION ~ J~~2 ~'~~3 ~~ Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Regarding: Summerfield Subdivision Message: We ask that the City of Meridian table action on the Summerfield Subdivision until after September 10, 1993; in order to evaluate the subdivision against the policies of the new Comprehensive Plan. NAME ADDRESS ~~ ,~~ ~- ~~ ~, `3~ ~~. d o ,~~~~, 7 a .3G9~~ COUNCIL MEETING REGARDING SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION The Meridian City Council Meeting will be Friday, 7:30 pm, August 20, 1993 at the Meridian City Hall. ~~~~~ >~ yZ 9 y~. ~y~. ~ ~ ~~~~~~r~~ ~(` JUL 0 2 1993 "`~ " PETITION 5 ~~-~c~ ~~ C1TV ~1Ft~'i~:i~gfU~,ro~ Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission ~`~ Regarding: the annexation and the zoning of the section bounded by North Locust Grove, McMillan Road, Eagle Road and Ustick Road Message: We ask that the City of Meridian ,not annex the above described area. At the present time, this area is zoned RT tone home per 5 acres). If annexed, we request that the area not be subdivided into parcels smaller than one acre; i.e., one home per acre. NAME ADDRESS ~~ ~ Z ~~- ~yz ~ii~ ~ ~L° /l9~XX,C/! A'C~IiU~ ~~94 /tX ~^~ `L.G~//lk ~~~tCl~!.CLonJ i~~1J~0~/(al 71 °Xo ~~J~ J u ~_ 0 21ss3 PETITION CITY ~~ ~+-1~:{Il~i~~l Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Regarding: the annexation and the zoning of the section bounded by North Locust Grove, McMillan Road, Eagle Road and Ustick Road Message: We ask that the City of Meridian not annex the above described area. At the present time, this area is zoned RT (one home per 5 acres). If annexed, we request that the area not be subdivided into parcels smaller than one acre; i.e., one home per acre. _~ L R,~~~IV]ED PETITION ,a U ~ 0 2 1993 ~ CiTY.I~I: i~iElKlUI~-N Presented to: the Meridian Planning an ~ fission Regarding : Summerf field Subdivision J ~~ ~ ~ , . Message : We ask that the City of M~~~ a;t.al~~y~rction on the Summerfield Subdivision until after September 1~, 1993 ; in order to evaluate the subdivision against the policies of the new Comprehensive Plan. ~G~ ~~ ~. ~~°~ The Meridian City Council Meeting will be Friday, 7:30 pm, August 20, 1993 at the Meridian City Hall. `COUNCIL MEETING REGARDING SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION • ~ ~~~~~~ G~~~ ~, `~~ r ~~ .~lq!. 0 2 1993 PETITION ~~~~~~~N Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Co ssioa Regarding: the proposed Summerfield Subdivision From: the following concerned citizens Message: we ask that approval for the Summerfield Subd.ivisioa be denied. Our concerns include overcrowded schools and traffic. We feel that it is inappropriate to additionally overburden our schools. N ADDRESS ~~ ~~ a-~-- ~ ~~a ~ ~ ~u/~~'-ice Yh~ ~ `~' ,_we a ~-- v • ,~ PETITION ~\~ Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Regarding: the proposed Summerfield Subdivision From: the following concerned citizens Message: We ask that approval for the Summerfield Subdivision be denied. Our concerns include overcrowded schools and traffic. We feel that it is inappropriate to additionally overburden our schools. ~ ~'~~ ~ ~. ~, ,~~~1 s~i~s~ ~ R~ S ~~~ PETITION ~ U ~ 1 3 1993 Presented to : the Meridian Planning and Zonifigo`h~n ~A~ Regarding: the annexation and the zoning of the section bounded by North Locust Grove, McMillan Road, Eagle Road and Ustick Road Message: We ask that the Gity of Meridian not annex the above described area. At the present time, this area is zoned RT (one home per 5 acres). If annexed, we request that the area not be subdivided into parcels smaller than one acre; i.e., one home per acre. NAME ADDRESS a 'G`lz ~~yz ~~ a r ~~ ~ ^/ • • ~ ~~~ PETITION ~~ ' n and zonin Commiss ./U~ ~ .~ ~~ ~., Presented to: the Meridian Planni g g ~~~,~~ ~~~~ Regarding: the proposed Summerfield Subdivision ~~~~fj~ ~~ From: the following concerned citizens Message: We ask that approval for the Summerfield Subdivision be denied. Our concerns include overcrowded schools and traffic. We feel that it is inappropriate to additionally overburden our schools. ADDRESS ~ ~ ~~~® " ~;`~~ ~ P ~~~ iz ~~~ PETITION ~.~ ~~ ~ ~3 Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission ,-, ~~ ~~. Regarding: Developers Impact Fee Message: We ask that developers pay an up-front impact fee, to be included in the Meridian city's Comprehensive Plan. This impact fee is to be used for the development and operation of schools and parks. NAME ADDRESS / ~~,,~G,~~~~'~~~~.~ o~l~D ~5'~r~~~~ /~lC'ri~ ~dn .,~c~~~O ~'3~~0~ ~~~ ~Od.. ~,®o ~ ~ a~ ~ 7 ~~ ~~~~.v l d FYI ~,o~(I ~~- f~ _.~'l. ,~ .4.~1//1 l~B~~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~7A r ~ ?~ +P I / 1 ~Y 1 d tit YI , -~-~Oi cJ ~ (7 '}!c COUNCIL MEETING REGARDING SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION The Meridian City Council Meeting will be Friday, 7:30 pm, August 20, 1993 at the Meridian City Hall. • • s' 4. PETITION •~~~' ~~ Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoni t"~~ i Regarding: the annexation and the zoning of the section bounded by North Locust Grove, McMillan Road, Eagle Road and Ustick Road Message: We ask that the City of Meridian not annex the above described area. At the present time, this area is zoned RT (one home per 5 acres). If annexed, we request that the area not be subdivided into parcels smaller than one acre; i.e., one home per acre. ~~ NAME ADDRESS • • 9 PETITION .~i~~ .~ ~~ Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Co~mm~ ion~~ ~~? Regarding: Summerfield Subdivision Message: We ask that the City of Meridian table action on the Summerfield Subdivision until after September 10, 1993; in order to evaluate the subdivision against the policies of the new Comprehensive Plan. NAME ADDRESS ~~,~~~ ~DO~~ ,~~~~ .s~~r~~n~ ~~~ _r ~ n ~-~~G ~~~~~ ~~~ Z ._ /~~~ ~ L 5 z .~ ,ne er-?c~~arl ~36~~ COUNCIL MEETING REGARDING SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION The Meridian City Council Meeting will be Friday, 7:30 pm, August 20, 1993 at the Meridian City Hall. ' • ~ +~ ~~~j~~ PETITION c, JUt 13 1993 Presented to: the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commissi ~ ~~~~~,~~~ Regarding: the proposed.; ie_ d==S ivisiony From: the following concerned citizens ~ Message: we ask that approval for the Summerfield Subdivision be denied. Our concerns include overcrowded schools and traffic. ~e ~~ feel that it is inappropriate to additionally overburden our schools. ~~riC~•wd. ~~d ~3~~~ l ~ ~ 3~~ 2 _o ri t~ t II I ~OC),C ~c'~1Ci ~~VI(% 9~V vC6Lf ~ pfd/~WIF-~s°-° ~ ~CS••n-'" ~ - _- -- - ~ ~~9 V ~~l ! ~ v /~/~/~Gi~v^~V r~ , ~/') ~.P" f ~J`-iras~G~.,oe, ,a~'~arr ~~' 6G~'~C'iS>~`1./~ July 12,1993 City of Meridian Att: Planning and Zoning 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 S ~ ~~d~~,s~~, RE: Proposed Summerfield Subdivision Dear Sir: R~~~ jv~~ CI JUG ~ 3 1993 TY ®~ ~~df1~1,~ We have lived in the Meridian area for over 21 years now and have watched as Meridian has grown over these years. The growth and the schools has always been a problem in our growing area, this, all tax payers have been aware of. Our request, with the fast growth of Meridian, that another look be given to maybe not stop but slow down the growth a bit. We are well aware that the Planning and Zoning did put a 100 day moratorium on building, we find this has not helped to much. We live off of North Locust Grove (between Ustick and McMillian) area. Besides the schools bring overcrowding, and the traffic, our most concern is TiiATER. Due to the droughts over the past six years, this last winter has not filled our underground agues. We now have two farmers on N. Locus Grove who have put in deep wells and are pumping thousands of gallons of water per week when they can use irrigation water to do the same job. All this takes down our underground water level to a dangerous low. We feel more pulling from this underground water will only lead us into drilling bigger and deeper wells of our own. We find this cost is unnecessary to do if only the Planning and Zoning will put a temporary ceiling on growth until the weather, rain, snow has a chance to refurnish the water supply caused by the drought. One winter of snow just won't replenish the underground water fast enough to conversant for the water taken out at such fast rate. New subdivisions will only drain our water faster.... We just ask for 2-3 years of NO new subdivisions in this area.. We also ask that we NOT be put into the Meridian City Limits. We thank you for your time. Yours Truly °~~ ,(y~~~ ~~~C~~~C~G~~ Pa 1 aI1~~~}}9....d Darle e S ague 1715 E. Paradise Ln. Meridian, Idaho 83642 888-1484 Gale L. Corr 1715 East Star Lane Meridian, Id. 83642 r~ U Planning and Zoning Board Meridian, Idaho Dear Planning and Zoning Board, RECEIV~ J U L 1 3 1993 CITY Of h~ElfifU-RN July 9, 1993 The concerns that I wish to express in this letter i.s for the community impact of our rapid expansion without enough utilities, schools, roads, and recreation to support the influx of people. An example of such a problem is the proposed tmmerfield Subdivisio at Ustick and Locust Grove. This area is to be small, closely built houses with no parks or playgrounds and insufficient development fees to compensate for the added load to sewers, water, streets and schools. All of which are stressed at the present time. The proposal to sink more deep wells for water for these new developments raises a concern for the water table to existing wells in the area and possible law suits should the water table drop substantially. I feel that to continue on the present course, is to invite the problems that our big cities now have, overcrowding, poor education, high crime, street gangs, ect. All of which are very expensive problems to fix after the fact and that mans much higher taxes, starting with schools, roads, and utility right-aways. One possible solution might be to charge the developer sufficient fees to make the upgrades necessary to support his development and to make minninum lot sizes 12,000 square feet or larger. Also, there could ~ a certain amount of playgrounds and parks built in purportion to the number of houses to be built in the sub-division. Due to these expressed concerns, my neighbors and myself are strongly opposed to the Summerfield Subdivision, project 93050, and other similar projects in the area. Sincerely, Gale L. Corr • June 17, 1993 Dear Sirs, My name is Jennifer Beaulieu. I am a seventeen year old attending Centennial High School. I have extremely strong feelings against the proposal for Summerfield Subdivision mainly because many of our schools are already overcrowded. Although I do feel it is important for the city of. Meridian to grow, I feel it is much more important for the young generation of this community to have the best learning environment possible. If Summerfield Subdivision proposal passes, I think the homes will be crowded too. The homes all around my neighborhood are at least a half acre. I have lived here for 11 years because my family likes the open area, as most residents here do. Wouldn't it be a better idea to build a subdivision where there is not good farmland, no people to disturb and where there is land to build new schools to accommodate the growing population? I really hope the proposal doesn't pass. I hope you will take the time to try and to understand where I and many other Meridian residents are coming from. Sincerely, Jennifer M. Beaulieu ~~~~~V~~ ~~~ 2 ~~ ~~ r t ~~~~~~~~ J U L O 7 1993 CITY ®F ~ERlt~l~~ ~Iune 16, 1993 City of Meridian Planning and Zoning 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 Gentlemen: I a `ritin to ask you not wield Subdivisi Road. to aggrove the annexation of the the corner of Locust Grove and Ustick There are many things you need to look at before approving the annexation. The most important issue is the overcrowding of schools in the Meridian area. The subdivision proposes to add 200 homes on 70 acres. With the likelihood of 2-3 children per household, an addition of 400-600 children will be added to the area with this one subdivision. Please consider allowing one acre lots in this subdivision. This addition would only be 140-210 children entering the district. If this is unacceptable, please cansider an impact fee to be added to each home, so that new schools can be built to accommodate the children moving into the area. This area is primarily an agricultural area. There is alfalfa, mint & grain being grown in this area. Pesticides and insecticides are being used and could affect the homes in the area. There is also a dairy farm, stud farm, and sod farm very close the proposed subdivision. These could contribute odors, flies, and noise to the residents of the proposed subdivision. These two issues could become an area of conflict between the farmers and the subdivision residents. Another issue is the water supply in the area. We are dependent on wells in this area for water. The city has asked the developer to put in a well for the subdivision. This may put a strain on the existing well users. Many of us my have to dig new wells just to accommodate this new subdivision. Also, a sewer line will have to be brought down to this area. My understanding is that the south sewer line cannot handle another 200 homes. A another sewer plant will have to be built to accommodate anything over 9? homes. This will be an added expense to the city. Public services for the city of Meridian are already stretched to City of Meridian 2 June 20, 1993 Public services for the city of Meridian are already stretched to the limit. Hour can the city accommodate even more? My intention is not to stop growth. My intention is to stop unplanned growth. The city needs to have an overall plan and a way of providing services to all those people moving into this wonderful area. Again, please consider keeping the area north of Ustick one acre lots. This would put less strain our on public schools and services. People who live on acreages are less offended by odors, noise, and dust caused by farming. Why not concentrate the area of growth out in the desert where valuable farm land is not being eaten up by housing? Thank you for taking the time to consider my views. Cy,; ~~. Cynthia Ann Lee 3665 North Locust Grove Meridian ID 83642 888-3096 1895 Star Lane Meridian, Idaho 83642 June 9, 1993 City of Meridian Att: Planning and Zoning 33 E Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Progosed Summerfield Subdivision Dear Sir: ~~~ ,1UN 15 1993 ~~~ ~~ ~R~1~~~ In reviewing the proposed Summerfield Subdivision, I would appreciate it if you would question its desirability. The following four factors are important to consider. *OVERCROWDED SCHOOLS: The 5ummerfield Subdivision would burden an already overtaxed school distxict with another 197 households. As of June 4, 1993, the high schools are above capacity. Centennial High School was built for 1800 students and had 1995 students. Meridian High School was built for 1800 students and has 2071 students. On June 3, 1993, Dan Mabe, Deputy Superintendent of Joint School District No. 2 states that "Meridian Schools do not have excess capacity." *WATER SUPPLY: An additional concern is the water availabitity. The present landowners need to be assured of the integrity of their water supply. *TRAFFYC: In addition, Locust Grove Road is not built to handle the traffic generated by additional subdivisions. The safety of the walkers, bikers and joggers will be further jeopardized by the increased traffic. *RURAL vs URBAN: The area north of Locust Grove is composed of acreages and agricultural lands. The agricultural uses include a sod farm, a stud farm, an exotic bird farm, and a dairy. Grain, mint and alfalfa are also raised in this area. It is probable that there will be conflicts between heavy residential use and agricultural use. Potential problems could be odors, the spraying pesticides and insecticides, irrigation usage and the narmal movement of farm equipment. Adding to the population of this area can only exacerbate potential conflicts. I request that the approval of this subdivision be denied until there are schools for the children, roads to safely walk and drive on and the present water users are guaranteed the integrity of their water supply. Sincerely, D' a L. Beatkli v Irrigation Design & CADD ~rvice 712 E. Fairview Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 ~` W S~ ~~ ~~' June 14, 1993 ~ECEl~~~ ~ U N 15 1993 CITY CI= ~tEl~l®IA~I Subject: Subdivision development NE Corner of Ustick and N. Locust Grove Road. Meridian City Planning and Zoning City Hail 33 East Idaho Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Committee Members, It has come to my attention that the above named area has been presented for a zone change and subdivisian approval. I have several concerns such as inadequate domestic water, lot size, and minimum square footage but two main concerns that appiy to ail subdivision applications. 1. I feel that our schools should have adequate capacity prior to the approval of new development. Presently our schools are at or over 1000 capability. School construction, if the future lending is presented and passed, is at least two years away. With the present inventory of building lots (1000+) within the present moratorium our schools will all be way beyond their capacity before new buildings are ready. 2. The capacity for added traffic is now inadequate. The additional N/S traffic on North Locust Grove has increased tremendously since the addition of the subdivisions between Ustick and Fairview off North Locust Grove Road and the Eagle Page 1 Irrigation/Construction Coordination Jim Moyer CADD Drawing S Digitizing (208) 888-6400 Irrigation Design & CADD rvice 712 E. Fairview Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 Interchange. It is understood that no road improvements are planned for the area before 1996. With the new subdivision just north of this new proposed development and some subdivisions north of McMillan Road the road system in the area will become congested without this additional load created by this 200 unit development. I object to density greater than half acre lots and houses of less than 2000 square feet for this area. The burden of irrigation is traditionally a problem for the domestic water system and typically, from my experience and knowledge, not adequately provided far by the developer. For the above reasons I oppose the approval for this development until the objections stated above are overcome. Thank you. Ver truly yours, Jim Moyer 2015 E. Paradise Lane Meridian, Idaho 83642 Page 2 Irrigation/Construction Coordination Jim Moyer CADD Drawing 8 Digitizing (208) 888-6400 • ~ ~~ t~J~ ~'3. June 18, 1993 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho St. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Attention: Planning and Zoning Sirs: This is to object to the current plan to annex to Meridian the section bounded by N. Locust Grove Rd., Md~iillan Rd., Eagle Rd., and Ustick Rcl. My husband and I prefer it not be annexed; but if it is, that the area be subdivided one home per acre being the smallest disivison. We heard Voight Co. was approved May 14, 1993 to develop three homes per acre on the corners of Ustick and Locust Grove. We are vehemently opposed to this, since we believe such density will be seriously adverse to the health of our already crowded schools, cause traffic problems, endanger water supply, and not provide needed parks land. If Voight develops, we wish to call your attention to what is done in Maryland. Its counties are authorized to require developers to pay "up front" public services costs, such as about 2~ for schools. Because the buyer of the homes absorbs these additional costs in turn, he/she can arrange to have the costs folded into the home loan and pay for them over the years in house payments instead of having to pay out of their salaries for future assessments to pay for the same services. Meeting future public services needs in advance makes an excellent selling point for the developer, and "Joe Blow dawn the street" who says he can undercut the developer must admit he cannot save the buyer from future assessments and costs which would have to cane out of the buyer's future salary. Pre paid and pre-built public services and smaller classrooms come together to raise better-eclucatecl and well-rounded children who then go out into the community to be better citizens than they otherwise would have had the opportunity to be. Let's not force the builders to be in competition with a market that gives their product that "too-costly" image. Channel vision says there must be only winners and losers. Let's allow builders to advertise that these sorely-needed public services are already part of their selling package. Let's have panavision which allays everyone to win except cheap "Joe Blow down the street." Sincerely, G'~-- Carol a nild «~~X.~~ Yn 9 2800 Jasmine Lane Meridian ~~ ~~ o ,, .dune 1~~ 19'3 Gity of Meridian ~'~ East Idaho Meridian, Idaha 5~6~12 Ike: ~~~mmerfiAtd fiuh~i~i~ian Gear Cauncilmen: I am vrriting you today in regards to another "planned development called Summerfieid Subdivision. ~s a fourth generation Meridianite I am increasingly alarmed at the uncontrolled gro~-th taping place ire our community. This sa-celled planned development wi11 1. Loeser the educational quality of our already over populated schools. ?. Increased traffic prabiems. 3. Cro~rd our park and recreational facilities. ~. Deplete our valuable aquifer system. 5. Higher crime rate. 6. Closing spacial living that you and I pay for and en jay. 7. Doer stress our public services pravided by the city. In conclusion, this subdivision, slang t~ith ether subdivisions built v~ithout careful consideration to schools, parks, roads and ether services is a disservice to the community of Meridian and t~i11 laver the quality of life far all of us. Sinter ly, e Red and Giane La~re 2125 Star Lane ~'~ ~ ~~: June 14, 1993 City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Atten: Planning & Zoning Dear .Sirs ; RECE.~~lED JUN 15 1993 CITE OF ~E~~ll-AN We moved to Meridian 14 years ago, because it was a nice community with alot to offer. Mainly a small town atmosphere. In the last 4 years or so, it has grown so much and our school situation's are so crowded that I am growing increasingly concerned, along with alot of other Meridian residents. Three years ago, we moved out off North Locust Grove, onto Star Lane. We wanted to be in the rural .part of town where we felt we would have more privacy and raise our family in a quiet part of Meridian, and give them the benefit of being in the country. Now with all of these Subdivision's creeping further out, we feel that we have lost alot of what Meridian has to offer. I am very concerned with the proposed Subdivision that is expected to be developed off of Ustick and North Locust Grove on the North side. I have heard that they have proposed putting in 200 small 1300 sq foot homes. This would greatly increase the traffic. at an already congested intersection. In the last month, we have witnessed 3 car accidents at that corner and 2 near misses. With only 1 Super Market (Albertson's) and increasing traffic problems, (try getting out on Fairview off of Locust Grove at 5:00), overcrowding schools and many other concerns, Meridian is losing that small town appeal. I know we can't completely stop the growth, but let's at least try to get a handle on it, so that us long time residence can still enjoy the main reason we moved here. Sincerely yours, Tammy Sorensen 1815 Star Lane Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~• JUN 2 8 1993 June 22, 1993 Meridian, Idaho 83642 City of Meridian Attn: Planning and Zoning 33 East Idaho Sirs: I am writing in regard to the proposed Summerfield Subdivision. I have many concerns regarding the proposal as it now stands. My main areas of concern are: 1. Number of cars using Ustick and Locust Grove Roads would increase by at least 200 cars. I don't feel these roads are capable of handling this kind of traffic. 2. There does not appear to be any "common" areas allowed in this subdivision. I feel the developers should include areas for parks/playgrounds as well as requiring sidewalks, proper storm drains, etc. 3. I have grave concerns about providing water to 200 houses in this area. As an owner of property with a private well nearby, I would ask that City of Meridian consider drilling any city wells deep enough so as not to interfere with existing private wells in this area. 4. It appears that the Meridian School District is not capable of schooling an additional 250 or more students in the immediate future. I feel the city should support the school district in obtaining some type of fee system to help offset costs of building new schools or additional classroom space required by the additional students. I strongly feel that this burden should not be placed entirely on the taxpayers. 5. I believe any subdivision north of Ustick Road should be in keeping with the subdivisions already in place, i.e., lots of 1 acre or more. I do not believe that putting 200 houses in this small area will add value or amenities to adjacent properties. • City of Meridian June 22, 1993 Page 2 I would ask that careful consideration be made for this and any other proposed developments in this area. I would like to see the present quality of life maintained there if possible. Sincerely, V. L. Hale 2150 Star Lane Meridian, Idaho 53642 CC: Bob Geisler, Meridian City Council Ada County Commissioners ~2 Q ~l SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Bob L Hatey EX~E~` ~EPUTY SUPERINTENDENT Dan Mabe, Finance 8 Administration ,~~\/~~ DIRECTORS +n*~ Jim Carberry, Secondary Christine Donnell, Personnel Darlene Fulwood, Elementary Doug Rutan, Special Services ~ ~ JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET MERIOIAN,IDAH063642 PHONE(208)888-6701 June 3, 1993 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Summerfield Subdivision Dear Councilmen: ~~~~ ~~~ 2 ~ I have reviewed the application for Sum~nerfield Subdivision. This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is beyond capacity. The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a need for additional school construction. We ask your support for a development fee statute on new home construction or a real estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we ask that additional residential development be denied. Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school as it may be necessary to bus students to available classrooms across the district. We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike paths and safe pedestrian access. Sincerely, t~~t~ r7~.2~ Dan Mabe, Deputy Superintendent .SuWbIM~t.-~elc~ ~I~ad` -~ ~~. ~M.gr ~2~~~ ~ G~~2~~~ ~~~ 4~ ev~ ®/z~~~ SUPEAINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Bob L. Haley ~pR EXCEL` ~DEPUDTY SUPERINTENDENT ~- an Mabe, Finance & Administration n DIRECTORS ~~~\i~~ ~ Jim Carberry. Secondary Christine Donnell, Personnel _Z ~~ Q Darlene Fulwood, Elementary Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET • MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 • PHONE(208)888-6701 June 3 , 19 9 3 ~~~~~'~' j~ ~l City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Summerfield Subdivision Dear Councilmen: JUN 2 9 1993 CITY i?F P~E~~I~~A~I I have reviewed the application for Summerfield Subdivision. This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is beyond capacity. The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a need for additional school construction. We ask your support for a development fee statute on new home construction or a real estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we ask that additional residential development be denied. Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school as it may be necessary~to bus students to available classrooms across the district. We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike paths and safe pedestrian access. Sincerely, Dan Mabe , ~ f,~~~~,-Z.~ Deputy Superintendent ~2. ~~-~--r c ~~~~. ~ ~~` 3~ ~~ ~ ~ ~,E~~~'~ JUN 151993 _-- - _ __ _ ~~ jQJ e T ' r p,`I'l~ ~~.~ __ - ~1~~ ~ ~~~ 2!12' _ _ - ~. • • ~~~~~~~ July 20, 1993 C1~~ ®F ~~~~~~~~ Meridian, ID 83642 City of Meridian Attn: Planning & Zoning 33 E. Idaho Re: Propose ummerfield bdivision In reviewing the proposed Summerfield Subdivision, I would appreciate it if you would. question its desirability due to some of the following factors. Right now the high schools in this crowded. I would hope that before are built in this area the problem schools would be solved first. If having builders of these subdivisi~ new schools before the subdivision it. J U l 2 2 X993 district are over anymore subdivisions with the over crowded this means ins supply the funds for is built then so be In the Summerfield Subdivision, it is proposed that a community well be put in. I was also told that it would have to be at least 700 feet down so as not to interfere with other wells in the area. I hope we are not leading u~ to problems with wells drying up like those in the Victory, Five Mile, Amity roads area in Boise. I think it should be looked at very hard whether there would be a well or City water should have to be supplied. The area north of 5ummerfield subdivision are acreages and agricultural lands. I thought that we were trying to conserve some of our acreages and agricultural lands by doing clusters with acre lots in these types of areas. If this subdivision is allowed then the gentleman that owns the subdivision next to Summerfield is doing to come back in requesting his property to be subdivided the same way and then we are looking at even more of a burden to our schools and water. Public Service is of has a Volunteer Fire firemen. How can it there were to be two Meridian does not ha' out to all the areas great concern. Right now Meridian Department with one or two full time ever take care of the problem if to three fires at the same time. ve the fire fighting equipment to go at the same time, nor do they have A. the man power. I suggest that we solve this problem before anymore new subdivisions come to Meridian. Right now with all the new subdivisions there is already a considerable fire risk. I am not at all in favor of this subdivision due to all of the above factors, along with the fact that this is a rural community and I feel it should be left that way. There is plenty of residential lands available for this type of building in the Meridian City Limits. Until we have some of the above problems solved then I think we should slow down and get them solved before it is made worse. Sincerely, ~~ ~/~~ Mat S. Brown 1795 E. Paradise Lane Meridian, ID 83642 208-887-4699 • July 20, 1993 J U l 2 2 193 CITY ~F ~1ER1~lAt~ City of Meridian Attn: Planning & Zoning 33 E. Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 i Re: Proposed erfield ubdivision In reviewing the proposed 5ummerfield Subdivision, I would appreciate it if you would question its desirability due to some of the following factors. Right now the high schools in this crowded. I would hope that before are built in this area the problem schools would be solved first. If having builders of these subdivisi~ new schools before the subdivision it. district are over anymore subdivisions with the over crowded this means ins supply the funds for is built then so be In the Summerfield Subdivision, it is proposed that a community well be put in. I was also told that it would have to be at least 700 feet down so as not to interfere with other wells in the area. I hope we are not leading u~ to problems with wells drying up like those in the Victory, Five Mile, Amity roads area in Boise. I think it should be looked at very hard whether there would be a well or City water should have to be supplied. The area north of Summerfield subdivision are acreages and agricultural lands. I thought that we were trying to conserve some of our acreages and agricultural lands by doing clusters with acre lots in these types of areas. If this subdivision is allowed then the gentleman that owns the subdivision next to Summerfield is doing to come back in requesting his property to be subdivided the same way and then we are looking at even more of a burden to our schools and water. Public Service is of has a Volunteer Fire firemen. How can it there were to be two Meridian does not ha' out to all the areas great concern. Right now Meridian Department with one or two full time ever take care of the problem if to three fires at the same time. ve the fire fighting equipment to go at the same time, nor do they have • the man power. I suggest that we solve this problem before anymore new subdivisions come to Meridian. Right now with all the new subdivisions there is already a considerable fire risk. I am not at all in favor of this subdivision due to all of the above factors, along with the fact that this is a rural community and I feel it should be left that way. There is plenty of residential lands available for this type of building in the Meridian City Limits. Until we have some of the above problems solved then I think we should slow down and get them solved before it is made worse. Sincerely, ~~ '~~o a., Kathleen A. Brown 1795 E. Paradise Lane Meridian, ID 83642 208-887-4699 • • S°rEPHEN T. SHERER ATTORNEY AT LAW Ci of Meridian 33~ast Idaho Meridian ID 83642 Re: Ladies and Gentlemen: SHERER LAW OFFICES, P.A. 208) 887-4800 AA??~~ 887800 June 17, 1993 SumryaeYfield Subdivision P.O. BOX 31 30 E. FRANKLIN ROAD MERIDIAN ID 83680 I am writing to you regarding the proposed Summerfield Subdivision. It is my understanding that the northeast comer of the intersection of Locust Grove and Ustick Roads is zoned RT, for residential transition in lots of five 5) acres or more. In fact, a neighbor just to the north, Mr. Dan Lewis, is selling ive (5) acre lots pursuant to the current zoning. The proposed Summer~ield Subd1v1s1on would create many problems for the city of Mendlan, as well as the residents of the area, of which I am one. Of course one would expect the subdivision to be on city water and septic system, overburdening the current wells already in use and further straining the sewer system. Second, this type of subdivision does not fit into the surrounding land use at all. The contemplated residences would be approximately 1350 square feet, not at all consistent with the vast majority of the houses within the one half mile of the proposed subdivision. This dense of a development plan should be created closer to downtown Meridian. Otherwise we will develop an urban sprawl that is neither acceptable to the current residents nor enjoyable to potentially new residents. Since this property is zoned RT, it would seen reasonable and feasible to require the transltlon that this zoning implies -- five (5) acre lots transitioning to country, or, if that plan is not feasible to the developer, then perhaps a compromise of medium density of two (2) to three (3) ~.cre parcels. That slze would at least create a transition from the high density of development around Chief Joseph School to the rural settings further north on Locust Grove and to both the east and west on Ustick. The last but not least consideration I would offer is to consider the impact on our schools. It is currently costing Meridian two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00) to educate each public school student each year. Boise is spending about three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500.00) per pupil. A subdivision with two hundred (200) houses, of 1350 square feet each, would probably contain (at a conservative estimate) an average of one (1) school age child per household. It would require five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) per year extra to educate these children at the current level of funding at Boise's level of funding it would take seven hundred thousand dollars [$700,000.00]). At an average rate of six hundred dollars ($600.00) in taxes per year, two hundred (200) houses would • contribute one hundred twenty thousand dollars ($120,000.00) to the tax base, not all of which, of course, is dedicated to schools. Two hundred (200) houses would create a net minimum of three hundred eighty thousand dollars ($380,000,00) burden for the school district. When businesses consider expansion they figure in their cash flow needs and problems to handle the growth. If they don t, they become bankrupt because while they have good future prospects they do not have present income to pay for their present e~enses. That is the problem currently facing the Meridian School District. This shortfall does not consider further expenses of capital improvements (i. e. new schools) necessary to support the additional students. For this reason a less dense division would make more economic sense, in that it would require construction of larger, more expensive houses, with attendant hi her property taxes per house, and would also tend to decrease the number of school age children moving into the district in that subdivision. Growth is a difficult issue for you, the city council, to address. 1~1ew gro~ti~th can mean new business and economic benefits from the area. However, at the rate Meridian is growing now, we will be bankrupt in five (5) years because our tax revenues cannot keep up with the expenses we will be incurring from this "expansion." We currently have a moratorium on building permits in Meridian. Wouldn't it be wise to prevent the kind of crackerbox, low income developments such as the proposed Summerfield Subdivision? These residences will not be for people providing industry or jobs to Meridian, but for Boise. I see no real benefits and many considerable problems for Meridian. Please seriously consider denying the application for Summerfield Subdivision. S' 1 , ephe T. Sherer STS/kjm ,~ ~ ~__ '`t . .. ~. - .l `. 2190 Star Lane Meridian, Idaho 83642 July 5, 1993 City of Meridian Attn: Planning & Zoning 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Gentlemen: J ~~ , ~ s,•;~,.~ r._.; $~°'°-"~ '~- ?: d / d I am writing regarding the Summerfield Subdivision proposal. I am against this proposed subdivision for the following reasons. 1. This valley used to be a desert and this past six years should tell you that our water supply could be reaching it's limit. We had to lower our private well 20' last summer. 2. Taxes to support and build new schools should be the responsibility of the developer's. 3. Road's are in bad shape and not adequate to handle this increased traffic. 4. Additional homes and automobiles will only add to our already poor air quality. Long time residents and tax payers should not have to pay additional taxes to support all of these new roads and schools. Sincerely, q~ C ~ ~ ' V •~ David M. McGillivary i i "i. ~W ~~ ~~ t.,.~ ~ ~_,v .~,~,-,. F ~ a - j } ,~ ~ ~G~~ =,.~~ _ ~~ e _... ~ n- , i' ' w' ,~~~"w~, ,~/ ,rim, ~~ ~ ,~, ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~n~~~ ~~ /u~ hod ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,~~ ~~u~e~ C'Gtn. f7an~ ~ ~z~~dcd ~~~ ~-~ rf /rirww- o~. ~c~~ ~ ~ .~ ~~ ~ , ~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ f ~~ ~.~ ,_ . a, `~_.. • IMPORT-ANT INFORMATION Tuesday, July 13, 1993 ~~~j /~l ~ T0: Homeowners in Heritage Subdivision & nearby cf~l' ® 3 ,9~3 FROM: Pe M ~ ~~~~~'~~ ggy Oyer SUBJECT: Information on Summerfield Subdivision This morning I talked with Wayne Forrey, City Planner/Clerk for the City of Meridian and received the following information. The Meridian Planning and Zoning meeting scheduled for 7:30 p.m. TONIGHT is NOT a public hearing; neither the developer nor interested citizens cart speak. You are welcome to attend the meeting to Tisten and become ~nforme t tonight's meeting, Planning and Zoning will make its recommendation to the City Council either to approve or deny the Summerfield Subdivision application for annexation and rezone. (Planning and Zoning's public hearing where testimony was allowed occurred last month on Tuesday, June 8th.) All information, letters and petitions which you wrote/signed will be given to the City Council. The next City Council meeting will be Tuesday, July 20th at 7:30 p.m. but the Summerfield Subdivision application will not be on the City Council agenda until~Tuesday, August 17 at 7:30 p.m. t t at time, pu lic input s ou be al owed and the City Counc~ can o one of three things with the application for annexation and rezone of Summerfield Subdivision: approve, disapprove, or table (postpone or take under advisement). For your information, all Planning and Zoning meetings are held. the 2nd Tuesday of each month at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall. City Council meetings are held the 3rd Tuesday of each month at-7:30 p.m. also at City Hall. Some of you asked why the Summerfield application .went before Meridian Planning and Zoning while the 5-acre subdivision just south of us and north of the Summer. field Subdivision was acted on by Ada County Planning and Zoning. Summerfield has requested annexation into the city of Meridian which can be done because the property is contiguous to a city parcel (point to point--northeast corner touches southwest corner). Ori the other hand, the 5-acre subdivision does NOT touch city. property by boundary or point so could not be considered for city annexation at this time. HOWEVER,. IT IS INTERESTING TO NOTE that James Hollister who owns Yukon Subdivision (the 5-acre lots just south of our subdividion--50.57 acres) was just given a one-year time extension for his development effective July 8, 1993. If you have not yet written a letter expressing your concerns, I would encourage you to do so. City Council DOES take into consideration the concerns of neighboring citizens and you can have an impact. ~.~ ~~ I~ ~~~e. C~ O O ~~~~~v~~ JAMES E. BRUCE, Resident GLENN J. RHODES, Vlce Resident CHARLES L WINDER, ~cretanr TO: G.L. Voight P.O. Box 2044 Idaho Falls ID 83403 FROM: Larry Sa Sup is Develop S JUN 2 9 1~~~ C~~Y ®~ M~ER1®~~N June 23, 1993 SUBJECT: SUNIlKERFIELD SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAT On June 23, 1993, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") approved the Preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to he satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: 1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of- way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District: a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho Registered Professional Engineer, tether with payment of plan review fee. b. Execute an Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. c. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of construction of all street improvements. ada county highway district 318 East 37th ~ Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 • • June 23, 1993 Page 2 3. Furnish copy of Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority together with payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs, as required. 4. If Public Rights-of-Way Trust Fund deposit is required, make deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier's check for the amount specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements, and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings for District acceptance, certifications, and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner's and Land Surveyor's certification. 7. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. An extension of one year will be considered by the Commission if requested within 15-days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at 345-7680, should you have any questions. LS cc: Development Services Chron G.L. Voight Meridian City Hall • INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE JAMES E. BRUCE, President GLENN J. RHODES, Vice Resident CHARLES L. WINDER, Secretary TO: ACHD Commission FROM : Development Services SUMRFELD / D3TECH B-23-93 DATE: June 17, 1993 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION (Developer - G.L. Voight, P.O. Box 2044, Idaho Falls, ID 83403) (Engineer -Hubble Engineering, Inc. , 9550 Bethel Ct. , Boise, ID 83709) FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. Summerfield is a 200-lot single family residential subdivision on 69.5 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Ustick Road and Locust Grove Road. There will be 10,800-feet of new public streets added to the system. 2. Ustick Road currently has 50-feet of right-of-way and is improved with 24-feet of pavement. The 2000 Urban Functional Street Classification Map designates Ustick as a minor arterial roadway, which generally requires a minimum of 66-feet of right-of-way (the District requires 90-feet of right-of-way for arterials in an urban impact area) , width sufficient for 4 traffic lanes (52-foot street section) and 5-foot sidewalks, and bicycle path- ways. The ultimate right-of-way should be acquired now to minimize acquisition and construction costs in the future . In the interim, the developer will be required to construct 5-foot side- walk. 3. The ACHD Capital Improvement Plan shows Ustick as currently operat- ing at Level of Service (LOS) A/B and is projected to operate at LOS A/B in 2010. It is approved for use of Road Impact Fee funds to in- crease its capacity; therefore, Road Impact Fes offsets may be given for construction of the roadway improvements along Ustick by the devel- oper, but may be given for right-of-way dedication in addition to what exists now. A person seeking offsets must submit an application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 PRELIMINARY PLAT ~UMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION • June 17, 1993 Page 2 4. Locust Grove Road currently has 50-feet of right-of-way and is im- proved with 24-feet of pavement. The 2000 Urban Functional Street Classification Map designates Locust Grove as a minor arterial roadway, which generally requires a minimum of 66-feet of right-of-way (the District requires 90-feet of right-of-way on arterials in an urban impact area), width sufficient for 4 traffic lanes (52-foot street section) and 5-foot sidewalks, .and bicycle path- ways. The ultimate right-of-way should be acquired now to minimize acquisition and construction costs in the future. In the interim, the developer will be required to construct 5-foot side- walk . 5. Staff recommends that a pedestrian access be provided to the adjacent parcel to the north between Lot 14 and 27 in Block 1. Coordinate the location with the developer to the north. 6. The public hearing for this application was held by the Meridian Plan- ning & Zoning Commission on June 8, 1993. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Submit a Traffic Impact Study to the District. Coordinate with Traffic Services Department prior to beginning the study. Additional require- ments may be imposed pending the findings of the study and any de- sign engineering work accomplished prior to the District's review and approval of the study is entirely at the risk of the applicant. 2. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ustick abutting parcel (20 additional feet) . The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues iri this bene- fit zone . 3. Construct 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Ustick abutting parcel adjacent to the new right-of-way line. 4. Direct lot or parcel access to Ustick is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 5. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove abutting parcel (20 additional feet) . The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone . 6. Construct 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove abutting parcel adjacent to the new right-of-way line. PRELIMINARY PLAT SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION • June 17, 1993 Page 3 7. Direct lot or parcel access to Locust Grove is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 8. Dedicate a 20' x 20' triangle (or appropriate curve) of right-of-way at the corner of Ustick and Locust Grove abutting parcel to keep the street improvements in the public right-of-way. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS 1. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right-of-way shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District stan- dards and policies . 2. Dedicated streets and drainage systems shall be designed and construct- ed in conformance with District standards and policies . 3. Specifications, .land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACHD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 4. Provide written approval from the appropriate irrigation/drainage dis- trict authorizing storm runoff into their system. 5. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drainage appur- tenances , etc .) outside of the proposed street improvements . Authoriza- tion for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. 6. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across parcel. 7. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 8. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACHD. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the requirements of Meridian City and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of- way or in a drainage easement set aside specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable amen- ities placed in said easement. Drainage easements and their use restric- tions shall be noted on the plat. 9. Provide design data for proposed access to public stets for review and appropriate action by ACRD. 10. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot proper- ty lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. PRELIMINARY PLAT~SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION June 17, 1993 Page 4 11. Developer shall provide the District with a copy of the recorded plat prior to the installation of street name signs . 12. Install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a project street to an intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be installed when the project street is first accessi- ble to the motoring public. 13. A right-of-way permit must be obtained from ACHD for all street and utility construction within the public right-of-way. Contact Construc- tion Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file number) for details. 14. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Develop- ment Services section at 345-?662. STAFF SUBMITTING DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: Larry sale JUN 16 ~99a a • 5~~ ,~i2 J°cv~ ~; ~~43 ~UMMERFIELD a G. L. Voigt Community Gary L. Voigt, a 20 yeaz Idaho Resident, has built and developed over 400 single family homes, 50 townhames, and many commercial buildings in Bonneville and Ada County. G. L. Voigt Construction and Developement specializes in planned move-up neighborhoods. Summerfield offers 314 of a mile of perimeter landscaping with a meandering sidewalk along U~stick and Locust Grove Roads, 3 landscaped entryways, and a neighborhood park with playground equipment and a basketball court. The Homesite's are designed to accommodate Move~Up Housing for the upper mid-range home buyer. The density is less than 3 units to the acre. Attached is a company brochure for G. L. Voigt Construction and Development. Please turn to pages 10 and 11 in the brochure For examples of neighborhoods and homes developed and build by G. L. Voigt. Also, attached are 5 home plans now under construction in Ada County. Following is a list of requirements for SUMMERFIELD. Landscaping Standards All homes will be landscaped with at least (3) Trees, (TO) five galloon plants, and (10) one galloon plants in the front yards. Automatic irrigation systems will be required. Homeowners Association A homeowners association will be formed to maintain the community common areas such as the perimeter landscaping and neighborhood park. Construction Standards All homes will contain a least 1500 square feet on all single level homes and 1800 square feet on all two story and multi level homes. The home values will range from $130,000 to $200,000 plus. ~~ Park Pointe REALTY, Inc. P. O. Box 8082 • Boise, Idaho 83707 • (208) 323-0062 3rlE3~i3.31AN PLANNING & ZONING ~ JULY 13 199,E The Regular Meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman Jim Johnson at 7:36c~ P. M. . Members Present: Tim Hepper, Jim Shearer, Moe Alid.jani, Charlie Rountree: Others Pt^esent: Don Bryan, Tom Eggar, Marvin Thorne, Carolyn Ridgeway, Bev Donahue, Lewis Bowen, Kathy Brown, Joe Simunich, Bill Schwartz, Wayne Forrey, Bill Morris: MINUTES DF THE PREVIOUS MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1993: The motion was made by Shearer and seconded by Alid,jani to approve of the minutes from the previous meeting as written: Motion Carried: All Yea: Johnson: Items #1-8 are Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law that have been prepared by the City Attorney. If you have na problem with these we can approve them alI at the same time. Rountree: I ,just have a question on Item #~, in the body of the Findings it has reference to the operating hours and times of the week, on Page ~. Those were not included in the Conclusions, my question is am I right in assuming that if they are in the Findings t1'iey are as well a portion of the Conclusions and would be carried tt-erough with? Johnson: We'll look at Item #~ separately. Are there any other^s that anybody has discussion or questions about. If not, let's handle Items 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 8 9 now. The Motion was made by Rountree and seconded by Shearer that the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adapts and approves these Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law. Roll Call Vote: Hepper - Yea; Rountree - Yea; Shearer - Yea; Al id,jani - Yea: Mat i on Car^ri ed : Al 1 Yea: The Motion was made by Shearer and seconded by Rountree that the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission pass on to the Meridian City Council a favorable recommendation on these items as indicated in the Findings of Facts and Conclusions on each one. Motion Carried: All Yea: Johnson: We'll now handle Item #;~ separately. DATE: \ ra I IL ~ ~qq,~ MERIDIAN PLANNI~ND ZONING AGENDA I TEM NUMBER ~ APPLICANT : _ U S~ICIC "1V ~~ ~ Q c ~1n o,T - AGENCY COMMENTS: MERIDIAN POLICE - MERIDIAN FIRE DEPT. - MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER - MERIDIAN ATTORNEY - MERIDIAN POST OFFICE - MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT - MERIDIAN BUILDING DEPT. - ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT - ADA STREET NAME COMMITTEE - CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH - NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION - SETTLERS IRRIGATION - IDAHO POWER - US WEST - INTERMOUNTAIN GAS - BUREAU OF RECLAMATION - MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY -Fn~t~ibS Ot ~GtG~ ~ CONG~USICNt Q+ L.Ge-~.c~ J MERIDIAN - PLANN I.NG D I RECTOR - OTHER COMMENTS: 4 S MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING JUNE 8, 1993 PAGE 14 Motion Carried: All Yea: Johnson: We will recess for five minutes: Meeting called back t o order. ITEM #iPD: PUBLIC HEARING: REDDEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING TO R-4 WITH SUMMERFIELD PRELIMINARY PLAT BY USTICK 40: 3ohnson: I will open the Public Hearing. Is there a representative present who wishes to testify? Dan Torfin, Hubble Engineering, 955121 Bethel Court, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Torfin: Discussed the merits of Summerfield Subdivision. Stated it would be no problem to comply with all comments f~^om City and other agencies. Developer will landscape the park and boundary as shown on colored master site plan. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone Vern Alleman, X101 E. Ustick Alleman: Voiced concerns farming. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone Herb Endicott, 1451 W. Ust ic1 else? Rd., was sworn by the attot^ney. about impact this would have to else? t, was sworn by the attar^ney. Endicott: The main thing that concerns me again is the well. I'd like to make sure that it is sealed and screened only at the bottom and must be aver 412ttd feet deep and screened at tt-ie bottom so that it will not affect any of the other neighbors wells. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else? Herb Dalrymple, 3539 N. Locust G1^ove, was sworn by the attorney. Dalrymple: I question the annexation at a time when the City's having difficulty in meeting their obligations in relation to public safety, recreation, water, sanitation and on this particular project, storm drainage. There is na Gity property in this section at this time and that^e's no storm di^ainage in there. 7 t4ER I D I Ah! PLAI'dl'~l I tVG AhID ZahJ I NG JUNE 8, 1993 PAGE 1~ Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else? Tom Davis, 2741 E. Ustick Road, was sworn by the attorney. Davis: I have the property east of this and the only thing that I would like is that if they develop over to the twenty acres that ,joins me on tree west, I would like to have a six foot chain link fence across there to keep al] the building material and everything in. The property north of me, when they built a house back then^e I had a lot of pr^oblems with insulation and building mates^i al s, car^d board boxes and everything way on out in my alpha fields. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else? Beverly Donahue, 375 N. Locust Grove, was sworn by the attorney. Donahue: I'm request that this application be continued until after the Comprehensive Plan is adopted this fall. This application is to large to not have a negative impact an the area and should be included in the Comprehensive Plan elements. Concerns about impact on schools - see tape. Petition submitted for the recor^d in opposition. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else? Crai g Groves, 39~Q1 E. Shadygl en Drive, Bai se, was sworn by the attorney. Groves: Mr. Boyd asked me to say a couple of things on his behalf this evening, he was unable to attend. He wanted to assure everyone here that his intent is to provide a very high quality development for that ar^ea. He recognizes the fact that he's tr^eading into new territory and it's important that things progress in a quality manner. I hope that the Commission perceives the project as a quality project. Within less than a mile of this project we've got a state highway that's going to be four lanes and a turn lane that will be constructed in late 95!96. The whole area out here is ,just growing and it's going to change. h1r. Boyd also talked with the school district today and they to]d him that they were wanting to have a grade school somewher^e in the middle of that section. There is plenty of land available in that section for a school site. I'm sure that with proper planning and the new update in the Comprehensive Plan MERIDIAN pLANNING AND ZONING JUNE 8, 1993 p'AGE 16 those types of things can be addressed. He also indicated that as a developer he is in favot^ of a local real estate transfer fee to support the growth in our schools, park lands, etc.. Developer is willing to help the City out with a well site. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else? F-eggy Moyer, CLd-15 E. Raradi se, was sworn by the att arney. Moyer: We live to the north of this in a subdivision and one point of clarification, just to the north of this is nat a five acre subdivision. It is a farmer who owns about 4tc1 acres, then to the not^th of him is a 55 acre parcel that has been divided into 5 acre parcels. 1 believe that that gentleman has expressed the desire that this project go because then he's going to come back and try to get a similar thing with his project of 50 acres, which would greatly impact us because we're just north of him. Concerns about impact on schools. Asks that pt^oject be delayed until City has completed other studies. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else? Chris Williams, 4185 S. Linder Rd., was sworn by the attorney. Williams: I just wanted to clarify for the neighbors that live to the north, the prior lady that was worried about growth going north. The current Met^idian service planning area stops one quarter mile north of Ustick. I know that there are plans to change that to bring that a quarter mile south of McMillan but that hasn't been passed yet. Far growth in sewer services, water•• and sewer to go north of this pt^operty, you can't do it at this point and time because the City Service Planning Area is stopped on that boundat^y. Chairman Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else? Leon Johnson, 1570 E. Ustick Rd. , was sworn by the attorney. Leon Johnson: If and when Locust Grove is to be widened in that area, where is the additional land to came from? Eng. Smith: Generally speaking half of the property will come from each side of the road. As these subdivisions develop the highway district will require a certain amount of right of way from the center^ line of the existing roadway on the developing side of the road to be dedicated for f-.it~ire road right of way. 1 9 ' ~ i*tERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING JUNE A, 1993 !SAGE 17 Leon Johnson: Thank you. Then just one last question, I'm assuming the point to point annexation is within the Comprehensive Plan approved, is that correct? Crookston: The only restriction for annexation is that the land be contig uous to the City limits. tExplained - see tape) Chairman Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else? Diane Beaulieu, 1895 Star Lane, was sworn by the attorney. Beaulieu: When we moved to the area just north of here, about ten years ago we moved there because we wanted a certain lifestyle. I think we need to really look at this and keep it mare "in the style of that whole area north of Locust G'r^ove, one acre or larger and work with the farmers. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else? Jim Hollister, 3860 N. Locust Grove, was sworn by the attorney. Hollister^: I'm the fellow that owns the property directly north of this project and to my knowledge there isn't anything between this project and our property and I would be happy to answer an}t questions that you might have on that Std acres regarding what the condition is of that. Crookston: How about access ft^om this subdivision into your, whether it's five acres or more dense, do you desire that? Hollister^: I haven't given it any consideration to be quite honest with you. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone else? No response. I will close the public hearing. The Motion was made by Shearer and seconded by Alidjani to have the attorney pt^e pare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #21: PUBLIC HEARING: RECdUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING TO R-8 WITH CHAMBERLAIN PRELIMINARY PLAT B1' KEVIN HOWELL: DATE: ~~~Y`R_ ~ ~IG,°3 MERIDIAN PLANNING ~ ZONING COMMISSION ,w, 11. AGENDA I TEM NUMBER~~ APPLICANT : ~~tt GL ~l® REQUEST: AGENCY COMMENTS: MERIDIAN POLICE - ~~~0 ~~Ip(Q,y~H MERIDIAN FIRE DEPT. - MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER - MERIDIAN ATTORNEY - MERIDIAN POST OFFICE - MERIDIAN SCHOOL D I STR I CT - ~ ~1~ lA(t~S~onc~ C1t MERIDIAN BUILDING DEPT. - ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT - ADA STREET NAME COMMITTEE - CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH - NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION - SETTLERS IRRIGATION - IDAHO POWER - ~ ~~~ ~prY~.S~~~CQ US WE5T - INTERMOUNTAIN GAS - BUREAU OF RECLAMATION - MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY - (~ i MERIDIAN PLANNING DIRECTOR - J00 Q nr~nDr OTHER COMMENTS: OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., Clty Engineer HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridia Planning and Zonin Commission, may we have your answer by: ~r'-~ -~ , ~L~ha yt 1g~3 ~1.~ mow,. TRANSMITTAL DATE : ~LL111~ " l `~Qq~~ REC BY: HEARING DATE:~~fAYlp ~T «?~ LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT":;~,_3 ~ ~~~ ~,'lC 8.~. ~~~~~~} i~l E C~o~n r a ~ ' ~5~~ lc. ~YY~ ~~^~„ . T ors ~}-~'r~_ JIM JDHNSON, P/ Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFDRD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C BOB GIESLER, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENt GARY SMITH, P. E. ENGINEER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PREL.& FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CElY7~RAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO. (PREL. & FINAL PLAT) U. S. WEST (PREL. & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PREL. 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PREL. 8 FINAL PLAT) WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER CITY ATTORNEY ~ n /'~ CITY FILES / )~ J SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Bob L Haley spa EX~F~` .DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT Dan Mabe, Finance ~ Administration Q ~n DIRECTORS ? ~~~\~~~ +*+ Jim Carberry. Secondary ~ Christine Donnell, Personnel G Darlene Fulwood, Elementary y Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 PHONE (208)888.6701 June 3, 1993 ~~~~~ City of Meridian J~~ ~ ? ~g~ 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~~`~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ Re: Summerfield Subdivision Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Summerfield Subdivision. This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is beyond capacity. The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a need for additional school construction. We ask your support for a development fee statute on new home construction or a real estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we ask that additional residential development be denied. Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school as it may be necessary~to bus students to available classrooms across the district. We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike paths and safe pedestrian access. Sincerely, ~tt r~~~~ ~ ~ J ~ ~vYldt L~l Dan Mabe, ~~~~Z~t~'~'~1~n~l/ C~ ~ ~~ ~~ Deputy Superintendent ~M:gr r ., OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE LASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., Clty Engineer HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208)888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning 6 Planning JIM JOHNSON Cantennlal Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY DF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridia Planning and Zonin Commission, may we have your answer by: tCr t ~n t i 'T ......~ LJ 1 Q ~-a><, t I ~ w..~ .... -- _ TRANSMITTAL DATE : ~Lw~~ ~ ~g ~, REt BY. HEARING DATE: ~AYIP ~t ~~?~ LOCATION OF PROPERTY. OR PROJECT:=~_~ ~ ~y~ Z ~ -~ $~~. ~~~ ~~~~ i`l E ~or~ r a ~ (,~S~~Lk. ~YY~ 11~,~~"~Yl')i7~ ~r],~I~ ors.a ~-+~v~ ~ 0~ [~~~ JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFDRD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C BOB GIESLER, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENt GARY SMITH, P. E. ENGINEER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN P05T OFFICE (PREL.B FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CElY7~RAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO. (PREL. 8 FINAL PLAT) U. S. WEST (PREL. 8 FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PREL. 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PREL. & FINAL PLAT) WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER CITY ATTORNEY ~~ ,~- ~'~ CITY FILES OTHER• ~~ra~is~ ~i`l'/' /~~2j'c ~~ ~ s !J®~ ~agrs e ~ ~~~ i3 ~ ~ 5v~~~ -~ ~~z ~w-Q. ~ 9 3 PETITION AGAINST ~ ~r~.__d_ ,/~ ~' S II H M E g F I E L D S II B D I V I S I O N Grove lots LD ~S ~ez~ ~~aJ~ ~ ~ •/ _~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ P~~ ~ALs ~~f°~'/~'eFJ®gy ~~l I / d . / I~ A .f~.P ~, ~~._ ~1~ ~ L ~ ~ n _ /~~ ~ 3glo,~ ~ Sir/ P O O~ fly// ~ lA ~ o ~~7~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~- 95 • , .. 3~~y ~ ~a~ ;i ~ ~G~ We the people of Ada County, North of Usick, around the area of North Locust petition for a minimum of one acre lots instead of the proposed 1/3 acre in the Summerfield subdivision. . s ~ • CERTIFICATE: I hereby certify that the following resolution is a true and exact copy from the Minutes of a meeting of the District's Board of Directors, held 2 October 1990, recorded at Book 56 Pages 187 and 196 through 202 (finalized 16 June 1992). ~~_ Dares R. Coon Secretary of the Board NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT WHEREAS, the various agencies .which are authorized to issue land use change/.site development permits have made it known that it~is in the best interest of the public that this District amend rules and regulations for development within the boundaries of the District; and WHEREAS, it has been decided that such a cooperative and coordinating arrangement can best be realized through an amended permit system; and WHEREAS, such requirements and requests have created a considerable expense burden to this District for which there is not available revenues; and WHEREAS, a Development or Land Use Change policy was previously set up at a meeting of the District's Board of Directors held 17 March 1980, recorded at Book 36, Pages 65 through 69, of the Minutes of the Board and recorded at Ada County as Instrument X8015309 and recorded at Canyon County as Instrument X890100; and WHEREAS, a Site Development policy was previously set up at a meeting of the District's Board of Directors held 17 March 1981, recorded at Book. 37, Pages 89 through 92, of the Minutes of the Board and recorded at Ada County as Instrument X8115542 and recorded at Canyon County as Instrument X919045; and WHEREAS, it has become necessary to combine and amend these policies. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following amended policies are hereby established by this Board as District policy to take the place of the previous policies. 0 w v ~~ a c~ w ~., ~ ~ . y ~ ~~ E m _~ N Q7 ~~ z~' o~ ~t ~ r~ z Q Y ~ 7 J '02y0022 NAMPA & MERIDIAN IkRIGAT10N GIS?hI~S AEA G~ J;~TY, I D. FOR ~.. J. DAVID P!A`YMaR f }RECORDER ' 92 Jl1N li P~1 1 `~ • NAMPA ~ MERIDIAN IRRIGATION AISTRICT Board of Direotors° Policy for Changes of Land IIsa or Sit• Development Developments or land use changes or site developments which affect irrigation and/or drainage, within the boundaries of Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must be approved by the District Board of Directors. An application form may be obtained at the District office which will provide necessary preliminary information for District review. General Information A. DRAINAGE: 1. There will be no acceptance of any increased flow in storm run-off, drainage, or any contaminated waters for which the District might be made liable by the Federal and/or State Clean Water Laws. 2. Existing or replacement of on-site drainage or run-off facilities or modification thereto must be perpetually .maintained by the site owner or owners. 3. Drainage plans prepared by a registered engineer may be required where deemed necessary by the District even though on-site modifications to the District drainage system are not required in the development plans. 4. If a drainage lateral owned and maintained by the District courses the site, no alterations of the lateral nor encroachment or its right of way shall be permitted without a license agreement. No access to such drain shall be denied to the District. B. IRRIGATION 1. The water rights of this District are not the same throughout the District. Neither are these always the same on one tract of land. Often these can be simplified without changing. the Court confirmed status of the rights, if arrangements are made with the Secretary of the District in the advance planning stages. 2. Any irrigation supply lateral or canal which is owned and operated by the District and which may course the site, must not be obstructed nor encroachment made on its rights of way. -1- C. 3. Any alteration from the original delivery point must be approved by the Water Superintendent and transfers to accomplish this alteration must be arranged with the Secretary of the District as part of the system plan acceptance by the Board of Directors. 4. No alteration or enclosure of an irrigation canal or lateral shall be permitted without a license agreement. No access to such canals or laterals shall be denied to the District. 5. If irrigation service is not to be provided to the individual properties, all property owners must~be notified that the District tax is an obligation of all lands in the Irrigation District. This notification is in compliance with Idaho Law. 6. No destruction, interference, nor limitation upon water flows which are appurtenant to the property rights of others shall be permitted. 7. If development plans include providing irrigation, operation .and maintenance of the system may be undertaken by a Lateral Ditch Water User's Association, in which case the District assumes no responsibility beyond the original point of delivery for the tract. 8. The District cannot provide permission for alteration of waterways belonging to and being a part of the property rights of individual land owners and to which waters flow from the system of the District. Permission must be granted from each of the property owners having ditch and water rights in-the waterway. REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS 1. Applicant shall complete and submit the attached application form to the Secretary of the District. Two (2) copies of the proposed plans shall be submitted with the application. 2. Upon approval of the original application, plans and specifications for construction, prepared by a registered engineer, shall be submitted for review to the District. Plans and specifications shall be reviewed by the District Water Superintendent and/or the District's engineers. If acceptable, •the developer will be notified. Prior to actual construction an estimate of the cost of construction shall be provided to the District. -2- ~ ~ 3. If a license agreement is required to conform to specifications of the District and/or recommendations of -its engineers, the Secretary of the District will then make arrangements for an appropriate license agreement for which the licensee shall be liable for payment of attorney fees. 4. The District shall be notified prior to commencement of construction. Inspection by representatives of the District or its engineers will not constitute approval of all or any part of the system and shall in no way relieve the developer or his contractor of the responsibility for providing a sound, workable system. 5. Within ten (10) days after completion of construction the developer's engineer must certify to the District that the system was installed in accordance with plans and specifications, and furnish as-built drawings to the District. 6. The developer and/or his contractor shall be responsible for the repair of all defects, leaks or failures occurring in the installation for a period of three (3) years after completion of construction. A maintenance and warranty bond in the amount of 10$ of the estimated or actual construction cost, whichever is greater, shall be furnished to the District within thirty (30) days after completion of construction. If the owner or his contractor fails to make required repairs or replacements promptly, the District shall make them, and the cost thereof shall be paid by the owner, his contractor or the surety. The fees required will be: S65o.o0 7. .Attorney fees will be required only where a license agreement is required and these will be payable directly to the law firm of the District's attorney. and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED; that the Secretary of the District is hereby ordered to send copies of this resolution to all planning and approval agencies in Ada and Canyon Counties and in the Cities of Boise, Meridian, and Nampa, to the County Commissioners of Ada and Canyon Counties and to the Mayors of Boise, Meridian and Nampa to provide sufficient copies of the policy and application form for the continual administration and use thereof by all interested parties. -3- ~ ~ STATE OF IDAHO County of Canyon ss. On this 16th day of Juno 1992, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, in and for said State, personally appeared Damn R. Coon, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. `i~~~,s~N ,uii~~~~, ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~i ~j',~pTAR~ ;~cA,'•w ~ ~.AUB ~tG.•'~o ~~~ ?'~ ~ P 1'4 ~~.• t ~~ ~ ,~G~G~-yam ~/ ~~~ .~r~..~ Notary Public - State of Idaho Residing at Caldwell, Idaho My Commission Expires: 11/04/94 -4- ~~&"'E~o ~~/ON ~~~ NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT (Reproduction of this form is not acceptable) Development or Land Use Change/Site Development Application GENERAL INFORMATION 1. (Proposed Name of Subdivision or Development) 2. ' (General Location) 3. (Legal Description - Attach if necessary) 4. (Owner of Record) (Address) 5. (Subdivider or Developer) (Address) LAND USE CHANGE/SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - Page 1 of 2 • • i 6. (Engineer) (Address) (Person to Contact) (Phone) 7. Acres ; No. of Lots • Number of Lots/Gross Acre 8. Proposed drainage discharge (Name of Drainage Lateral) 9. Is irrigation water to be provided to property? If yes, answer the following: a) Proposed delivery point (Canal or Lateral) b) Present delivery point for this land c) Type of system 1) Gravity. (Piped or open ditches) 2) Pump pressure (Signature) (Date) (Application must be filed with the Secretary of the District. The appropriate fees and two (2) copies of all plats and drawings must be included with the application.) LAND USE CHANGE/SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - Paqe 2 of 2 ' ~ :: -~ i ~- ~~~+ ° ~~ DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION ~~ ~ TRAFFIC STUDY JULY 15. 1993 .l ~__ , DOBIE ENGINEERING. iNC. SUBMITTED T0: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DIST$ICT 318 E. 37TH. ST. BOISE, :IO 83714 .~ ~~~~ ,- ~, .~ ,- .-v~ ~, 777 HEARTHSTONE DR., BOISE. ID 83702 (208)345-~.3Z~Q~ ry'"' r .~ 4 .q ~ .': , Y {_ SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS i PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Study Objectives On-Site Development Study Area Land Use Community Development and Growth PROJECTED TRAFFIC Existing Traffic and Circulation Trip Generation Trip Distribution Traffic Assignments CAPACITY ANALYSIS -LOS Capacity Analysis -Intersections Capacity Analysis -Roadways OTHER TRAFFIC ISSUES Subdivision Entrances Neighborhood Circulation APPENDIX A: ACHD Conditions of Approval APPENDIX B: LOS Analysis Criteria APPENDIX C: Proposed Subdivision Maps 1 1 2 3 4 6 9 10 11 13 14 15 I '_ SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY MCMILLAN RD. PHEASANT POI TE SUBDIVISION USTICK RD. BORU PARCEI\ PRO OSED SUM ERFIELD SUB IVISION ~ p " ~ ~ ~ PROPO CHAMB D LAIN ~ SUBDIVI ION Z ~ Q W D 0 Z ~ J W HUNTER POINTS ~ CHERRY LANE SUBDIVISION o FAIRVIEW VE ~ o ~ ~ W. PINE AVE. ~ ~,., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a U W O _ J FRANKLIN RD. INTERSTATE 84 OVERLAND RD. Traffic Study Prepared By: :rte DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. 777 Heorthetone Dr. Bolae. ID 83702 345-3290 FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP'' 6 ' ~ SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUOY 2 Study Area Land Use Located in western Ada County within the Meridian Planning Area, the site has historically been used for agriculture and is now in a transitional stage. Land use in the immediate area is changing to single family residential with a typical development density of 3.0 to 3.5 units per acre. APA Traffic Zones 239 and 240, which are northwest and northeast of the Ustick -Locust Grove intersection, are currently undeveloped. An undeveloped 20 acre parcel and the proposed Chamberlain Estate Subdivision are located in the - southeast quadrant of the intersection. The southwest quadrant consists of three parcels: Pheasant Pointe Subdivision (27.6 acres), the Borup Parcel (16.5 acres) and the Riddlemoser Parcel (12 acres). Immediately south of the Pheasant Pointe Subdivision site is the Hunter Pointe (Tract) Subdivision consisting of a phased development of 300 single family units on 80 acres. Also located within the area west of Locust Grove is the Gem Park Subdivision (80 units). East of Locust Grove and below the 20 acre undeveloped parcel south of Ustick is the Chateau Meadows East Subdivision (325 units). Approximately 300 units have been developed in the study area and an additional 700 lots have received preliminary plat approval to date. The locations of the approved subdivisions and general road system for the study area are shown in Figure 2. Prepared by Doble Englneering, Inc. is SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY PROPOSED SUMMERFIELD SUBDIy1S10N (200 UNITS) T~tAFFIC zoNE zu x. PHEASANT TRAFFIC zaNE 210 IJSTICK ROAD j ~ PROPOSED PNE/1SANT PONTE S1J~IN90N ~ i i '~ BCfnIP PARCEL ~ ~ ~ ~:s., ~ ~ ~~~ L _ ~ _WAr ~AN SUS. i~ ...........(4R..uM!T.Sa .................... NiJNTER PONTE YEADOIN ORASS 87REET ElEYENTARY Sp1pOt_ Q GEY PARK (t10 !!NITS) E. AVE Traffic Study Prepared By: DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. CHATEAU YEADOtt,4 EAST (32S UN115) J FIGURE 2 LOCAL CIRCULATION' 777 Hearthstone Dr. Boise, ID 63702 345-3290 ' SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 4 PROJECTED TRAFFIC Existing Traffic and Circulation The current AM and PM Peak Hour traffic volumes in the general vicinity of the subject property are illustrated in Figures 3 and 4. A discussion of the primary transportation elements follows. Ustick Road is classified as a Standard Minor Arterial and carries area traffic between Eagle Road and Meridian Road, the principal north/south arterials on the transportation network. Ustick is a two lane road between Locust Grove and Meridian Road and has a 50' right-of--way. The roadway is 24 feet wide with 2-4' gravel shoulders. The posted speed limit is 50 mph. Locust Grove and is classified as aSub-Standard Minor Arterial between Ustick Road and Fairview Avenue, the principal east/west arterial. Portions of Locust Grove are 49 feet wide with curb, gutter and sidewalks adjacent to the developed subdivisions in the north half of the Section. Locust Grove has 50 feet of right-of-way and is only 24 feet wide adjacent to the Summerfield Subdivision property. The posted speed limit for Locust Grove is 25 mph. The Locust GrovelFairview Avenue intersection is currently an unsignalized intersection. Anew signal is now proposed for installation in 1993. The Locust GrovelUstick Road intersection is unsignalized with stop control on Locust Grove. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. Existin4 Traffic Volumes Average Daily Traffic: Vehicles Der Dav: Locust Grove Road South of Ustick 1800 Locust Grove Road North of Ustick 1600 Ustick Road West of Locust Grove 3000 Ustick Road East of Locust Grove 3500 - Prepared by Dobie En8lneering, Inc. Exit Peak PM Hour Enter Exit (73%) 1.0 (63%) (37%) These rates indicate that the peak hour traffic is greatest ~n the evening hours and is primarily influenced by work related trips. Both the AM and PM Peak Hours were evaluated in this report to help identify problem areas and conflicts. Prepared by Dobie En~lneering, Inc. SUMMERFIELO SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 7 Based on the trip generation rates in Table 3, the future site-generated traffic at full buildout of Summe~eld Subdivision was estimated. The findings are presented in Table 4. Table 4 Site Generated Traffic (Rounded) Subdivision: No. Unit New TrIDS/Dav PM PH Trips AM PH Trigs Summerfield 200 1910 190 134 Shown in Table 5 is the projected traffic that will be generated from the buildout of the Summer'field Subdivision and the adjacent parcels and traffic zones in the study area. Table 5 Proiected Studv Area Traffic (Off-Site) Parcel Pheasant Pointe Hunter Pointe Riddlemoser Parcel Chamberlain Estates Chateau Meadows East Traffic Zone 239 Traffic Zone 240 New Trips PM PH AM PH No.Units Per Dav TrIDS TrIDS 92 880 88 62 300 2860 286 200 42 400 40 28 92 880 88 62 325 3103 310 217 25 240 24 17 25 240 24 17 Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY ., 8 Based on the trip distribution discussed in the following section, site- generated traffic was assigned to the internal subdivision street system. Presented in Figure 5 is the traffic distribution within the Summerfield Subdivision. Prepared by Doble Ertglneering, Inc. SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC FIGURE 5 0 0 Y U 1- ~~ ~t ~ ~ SCALE: '°" °°'®'." ~o"a~.fi'~t° ~~~. sum 1~i N. LOCUST GROVE ROAD SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY Trip Distribution The subject property is located at the northeast end of the Meridian Planning Area, and the majority of the primary attractions (school, shopping, employment) are located to the south and west. Access to the Boise metropolitan area and access to Interstate Highway 84 via Eagle Road are to the southeast. Existing traffic counts would suggest that 40% of PM trips would arrive from the north and west and that 60% of the PM trips would arrive from the south and east. These distribution assumptions, along with school and shopping center locations, were used to allocate traffic to the roads within the study area. Chief Joseph Elementary School is located south of the Hunter Pointe Subdivision and would receive children from the Summerfield Subdivision until a new school is constructed north of Ustick Road. Middle school students currently attend Meridian Junior High on 8th Street south of Cherry Lane. Upper grades attend Meridian High School on Linder Road south of Cherry Lane. The Cherry Plaza Shopping Center, the Meridian Shopping Center and Northview Shops are located west of the site along Fairview Avenue. Access to the central business district of Boise and Meridian is most efficient along Fairview Avenue or I-84. Prepares by Doble Enpineerin8, Inc. SUMMERFIELO SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 10 Traffic Assignments Based on the land development assumptions previously discussed, future trips resulting from growth in the surrounding traffic zones were estimated and assigned to the adjacent streets. Projected turning movements for the calendar year 2003 at the project entrances and the UsticWLocust Grove intersection are illustrated in Figures 6 and 7. These movements include the future traffic from the Summerfield Subdivision. Prepared by Doble Enpirberir~g, Ir~c. . ~a .. SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY FIGURE 6 PM PEAK HOUR YEAR 2003 TRAFFIC WITH SITE TR AFFI C NORTH ENTRANCE fr nl ff fe fe n~ ~ ~~ Q O O t~ !-- N U O J ~~ ft tz' 19 SOUTH ENTRANCE ~' ~ ~= U STI 113 P43 f3 -~ 93 l 2 1P2 36 ~ ~~~ >~ ~ ~ 1~ 3 g • .'. ~i a ~ ~ CK ROAD f4 ~ 364 364 P4 Pf f83 1t93 n Traffic Study Prepared By. :~ ~ ~. DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. 777 MwrtAetone Dr. Boise, ID 6]702 345-5290 :~:~ ,_ , 1 1 j ~ Igg ~ ~~ ~p ~ I ;i~l~~ i II ll~t ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ a~ ~~ ~~~ .. s: !~ ~~ k- ~~ ~~'~ ds •~~~ e~~.oc srn ~ !: { w a iaao ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ sift ~: ~ 1~c4' ~~ -~, 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ b ' its * as s~ ~ 4 ~ r • '~_ ~ e ~ ~~~ O ~ ~' ~- ~~` ~ ~ (~ 'R t ~i i ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ d 7 ~ 0 ~ ~~~ r~ ~- ~~ f`~ ~ I ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ !1 1 ~ ~ ~ ' ~,, ~~~I~ ~~ ~~ ~ f ,~. ~ .,~ ..4 Iv ~M •t r ... ~~ k r .. ~+,ar i ~' I~ B ~ IO y . IiS3'l • 1f J1' ~ ' • ~ ~~ { ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~:1 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ i~~, ~ ~ ~ r I 1 i ~ ,~ ~ _ . ® s h~ ~_ _ ~~~ ~ ' ~• - - 'i f !`~ •~) ~! PLAT SHONANG ,~ sc~: ~• • ~oo• SUMMERFIELD ND. > LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW t/4 ANO THE SW t /4 OF THE SE 1 /4 OF SECTION 12. T.3N.~ R.IE.~ B.M., 801SE. ADA COUNTY. IDAHO 1993 -- --- ~ ~ : ~ ~ s ~ , u I ~ ~ w~aar ~ , ~ ~~ i a 1 I • • u L I r -•-•-•-*-•---- ~-•-•- I ~ ~ I r I. 1 ~- SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY FIGURE 7 NORTH ENTRANCE w I8 Is s ~~ ~ ~O ~O ~ w NO {A.. Q 10 ~ Is 4 N ~ SOUTH ENTRANCE U O J ~~ ~n n ~ o~ b USTICK ROAD 166 166 24 . P4~ 223 223 I8 I~ N ;p ., „ •~a l84 AM PEAK HOUR YEAR 2003 TRAFFIC WITH SITE TRAFFIC it m ~ w a II . 184 ~ 29 4S0 4Sp .~~ ~ :~': DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. m -+e~u,naro o.. ea.., io es~o2 ~ s4s-azso Traffic Study Prepared By. SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY '" 11 Capacity Analysis -Intersections A capacity analysis and Level of Service calculations were prepared to evaluate the future traffic conditions at the project entrances and major intersections in the surrounding area. A discussion of Level of Service standards is included in Appendix C. Presented in Table 6 are the findings of the LOS analysis for the entrances during the PM Peak Hour. This analysis is based on the projected traffic conditions for the year 2003 plus the site traffic associated with the full development of the study area. The calculations are included in Appendix D for review. Table 6 LOS Analysis at Project Entrances AM PM Location Level of Service Level of Service North Entrance at Locust Grove A A South Entrance at Locust Grove A A Summerfield Way at Ustick Road A A The major intersection impacted by the development of this area is at Ustick Road and Locust Grove Road. Pre~red by Doble Englneerinp, Inc. SUMMERFIELO SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY ~c This intersection was evaluated based on existing and future traffic conditions. In Table 7 a Level of Service analysis is shown which is based on 1993 and 2003 traffic loading. Under present conditions the intersection has an acceptable Level of Service of A/B. However, when subjected to the projected traffic increases, the LOS falls to the D range indicating long trafi:tc delays. Table 7 LOS Analysis at Maior Intersections 1993 LOS 2003 LOS Intersection AM PM AM PM Ustick and Locust Grove: NB A A F D SB A A E E EB A A A A WB A A A A Traffic projections indicate that a signal will be required prior to the buildout of the various approved preliminary plat subdivisions in this area. Based on a review of the development activity in the study area and reserve capacity in the critical lane movements, it would appear that the signal may be needed within a 5 to 10 year period. No data is available to assess the signal warrant condition. However, due to ' the relatively equal distribution between north/south and easUwest traffic, meeting • Warrant No.2 appears inevitable once the traffic volume has materialized. :, Prepared by Doble Englneerinp, Ir~c. SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 13 Capacity Analysis -Roadways A capacity analysis of the arterial roadway sections in the vicinity of the Summerfield Subdivision is presented in Table 8. This analysis assumes a lane capacity of 550 VPH (Suburban/Substandard/45 MPH/No Parking) and 490 VPH for a standard four-lane section. (Source: ACRD Capital Improvements Plan) Table 8 Roadway Ca pacity Level of Service Anal ysis PM Peak 2003 Road # Lanes VPH LOS Locust Grove at North Entrance 2 390 A/B Locust Grove at South Entrance 2 441 A/B Ustick Rd. at SummerFeld Way 2 603 A/B All of the area roads appear to have the capacity to support the buildout of the study area and projected 10 year background growth without expanding beyond 2-lane road sections. The projected traffic volumes do not warrant 4-lane road sections at this time. Pre~red by Doble Eng(noering, Inc. i J _. i f •- SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 14 ;' Subdivision Entrances Both the Summerfield Way entrance at Ustick Road and the south entrance at Locust Grove Road will be median divided fourlane roadways. Presented in Table 9 is an analysis of the need for center left-turn lanes in the major roadways. Table 9 Analysis of Left Turn Lane Maximum ODDOSIRg Percent Advancing Allowable Intersection Volume Left Tum Volume Volume Summerfield Way ~ Ustick (PM) 399 6% 207 446 OK North Entrance ~ Locust Grove (PM) 232 5% 169 579 OK South Entrance ~ Locust Grove (PM) 244 5% 168 564 OK Since the advancing volume is below the maximum allowable volume during the PM Peak Hour, a left turn lane is not required at any of the subdivision entrances to accommodate the full buildout of the site. Because the left turn volume from the major roads is lower in the AM hour, only the PM Peak Hour period was analyzed. Prepared by Doble EnBlneerlnp, Inc. SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 15 Neighborhood Circulation Figure 8 shows the location of the Summerfield Subdivision relative to the new subdivisions occurring in this area. The internal street system includes a stub to the east to eventually connect to a midsection line collector street. As future development occurs in the middle of this section, the traffic will be directed toward ~ the collector. Therefore, it is not necessary to extend a street north from t Summerfield, since this would encourage thru-traffic into this residential area. As the area further develops, it is probable that a new grade school will be constructed near the midsection. To provide access to this school it is recommended that a pedestrian pathway be extended northeast of Summe~eld. ,~ Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. FIGURE 8 /a - : ..; Ij•• :~ ~ '- P H~A~Al:I~~_P~?.1~1T E ~..-,.. su-~~~ ~ 1 _~.-.-,-~--r~-~-rT-rT'- 1 « 7 . CauaG _- \~ ~~ r "°' ~~~ ~ ,~ ~ • ~. ~ MOM wul WtI11T RDi~ITE R P01 IJTE a ~---- - ~ ~- ~ ~yi ~ ti ~ _ ~. , • ~ ~ • !` • ~ • ~ • ~ 1 • • '•• _ ~ ~ ~ ~• CF~MBERC7~1~1--~~_.__ 1 APPENDIX A TO: ACHD Commission FROM : Development Services INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE SUMRFELD/DBTECH 6-Q3-03 DATE: June 17, 1993 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION (Developer - G.L. Voight, P.O. Box 2044, Idaho Falls, ID 83403) (Engineer -Hubble Engineering, Inc., 9550 Bethel Ct., Bofse, ID 83709) FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. Summerfield is a 200-lot single family residential subdivision on 69.5 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Ustick Aoad and Locust Grove Road. There will be 10,800-feet of new public streets added to the system. 2. Ustick Road currently has 50-feet of right-of-way and is improved with 24-feet of pavement. The 2000 Urban Functional Street Classification Map designates Ustick as a minor arterial roadway, which generally requires a minimum of 66-feet of right-of-way (tbe District requires 90-feet of right-of-way for arterials in an urban impact area), width sufficient for 4 traffic lanes (52-foot street section) and 5-foot sidewalks, and bicycle path- ways . The ultimate right-of-way should be acquired now to minimize acquisition and construction costs in the future. In the interim, the developer will be required to construct 5-foot side- walk . 3. The ACHD Capital Improvement Plan shows Ustick as currently operat- ing at Level of Service (LOS) A/B and is projected to operate at LOS A/B in 2010. It is approved for use of Road Impact• Fee funds to in- crease its capacity; therefore, .Road Impact Fee offsets may be given for construction of the roadway improvements along Ustick. by the devel- oper, but may be given for right-of-way dedication in addition to what exists now. A person seeking offsets must submit en application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACRD Ordinance #188. ~: ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 63714 • Phone (208) 345.7680 JAMES E. BRUCE. President GLENN J. RHODES. Vice Resident CHARLES L. WINDER, Secretory PRELIAi1NARY PLAT - SUA'A~IERFIELD SUBDIVISION June 17, 1993 Page 2 4. Locust Grove Road currently has 50-feet of right-of-way and is im- proved with 29-feet of pavement. The 2000 Urban Functional Street Classification Map designates Locust Grove as a minor arterial roadway, which generally requires a minimum of 66-feet of right-of-way (the District requires 90-feet of right-of-way on arterials in an urban impact area) , width sufficient for 4 traffic lanes (52-foot street section) and 5-foot sidewalks, and bicycle path- ways. The ultimate right-of-way should be acquired now to minimize acquisition and construction costs in the future. In the interim, the developer will be required to construct 5-foot side- walk . 5. Staff recommends that a pedestrian access be provided to the adjacent parcel to the north between Lot 14 and 27 in Block 1. Coordinate the location with the developer to the north. 6. The public hearing for this application was held by the Meridian Plan- ning & Zoning Commission on June 8, 1993. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1..~Submit a Traffic Impact Study to the District. Coordinate with Traffic Services Department prior to beginning the study. Additional require- ments may be imposed pending the findings of the study and any de- sign engineering work accomplished prior to the District's review and approval of the study fs entirely at the risk of the applicant. 2. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ustick abutting parcel (20 additional feet) . The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this bene- fit zone . 3. Construct 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Ustick abutting parcel adjacent to the new right-of-way line. 4. Direct lot or parcel access to Ustick is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 5. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove abutting parcel (20 additional feet). The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee, revenues in this benefit zone . 6. Construct 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Locust Grove abutting parcel adjacent to the new right-of-way line. '~ 'PRELIA~INARY ' June 17, 1993 Page 3 { PLAT - SUMI-1ERFlELD SUBDIVISION 7. Direct lot or parcel access to Locust Grove is prohibited, in compliance with District policy . Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 8. Dedicate a 20' x 20' triangle (or appropriate curve) of right-of-way at the corner of Ustick and Locust Grove abutting parcel to keep the street improvements fn the public right-of-way. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right-of-way shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District stan- dards and policies. 2. Dedicated streets and drainage systems shall be designed and construct- ed in conformance with District standards and policies . 3. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACHD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 4. Provide written approval from the appropriate irrigation/drainage dis- trict authorizing storm runoff into their system. 5. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drainage appur- tenances, etc.) outside of the proposed street improvements. Authoriza- tion for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. 8. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across parcel. 7. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 8. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACRD. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the requirements of Meridian City and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of- way or fn a drainage easement set aside specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable amen- ities placed in said easement. Drainage easements and their use restric- tions shall be noted on the plat. 9. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACRD. 10. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot proper- ty lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property . .~ • ' • PRELIA9INAKY PLAT - SUNIMERFIELD SUBDIV1S10N June 17, 1993 Page 9 11. Developer shall provide the District with a copy of the recorded plat prior to the installation of street name signs. 12. Install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a project street to an intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross-street . The stop sign shall be installed when the project street is first accessi- ble to the motoring public. 13. A right-of-way permit must be obtained from ACRD for all street and utility construction within the public right-of-way. Contact Construc- tion Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file number) for details. 14. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Develop- - went Services section at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING Larry Sale DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: JUN 16 1993 .~ APPENDIX 8 ;i LOCATION:SUMHIERFIELD AT USTICK =---------------------------------------'NAME_SUMMERFIELD ------------- Y^URLY VOLUMES -I- VOLUMES IN PCPH r Major street:USTICK,RD- ~ N W ' -------------------- ---------------- N_ 1 ----- ~ ------- ---- Grade 184--- <---VS--- 450 ; __-'-_--------- 0% 11---V3---v v---V4---N- 17 ~ -V2---> v---V4--- - V3 -v ----- ---_ <i ~> Date of Cou - ~ ---------_ ~ _________________ _ , ----- ~~ n s. ~ ~ ~ ;> ----- 2003 V7 V9 X STOP ~ ~ ~ ~ ~----__- Time Period: ~ ~ ~ ~ V7 V9 ; AM ~ 29 ' 19; YIELD ~ ~ ~ i ; Approach Speed- Minor Street: Grade ' ' 32 21; 45 - SUMMERFIELD WAY 0% PHF: .9 N= 2 ' Population: 100000 ---------------------- __ ------------------------------------------------------------------- 'VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS --------'-------- Movement no-------------~----2------------------------------------------------- --------- '~ ~ ~ 5 ; 7 ' 9 --------- ' 4 , Volume (vph) -------------------- ------------------ 184 ; 11 ~ 7 , ------------------- __ _ ~ 450 ~ 29 ' 1'Vol(pcph),see-Table 10.1;XX3i3(:i~XXX'x~u~XXXX ___________________________~--__15--~ -------- - ------------- X. 8 ; XXXx~;3CXX~ 32 ~ 21 ' STEP 1 - ------=---------- ------------ ___ ___ RT From Minor S ------'-------------------------- L ...nflicting Flows, Vc --- ______-___ Critical Gap,, Tc ~ 1/2 V3+V2= 6 + 184 = 190 vph(Vc9) Potential Capacity, Cp ~ Tc= 6.5 secs (Tab.10.2) [ Actual Ca ~ CP9= 730 c h pacity, Cm P P (Fig-10.3) -----------------------____ ~ Cm9=CP9= 730 pcph STEP-2-_-LT-From-Major Street=====______~______________________________________ . vonflicting Flows Vc___________________~______=====v===V4=====_________------- ' ~ V3+V2= 11 + 184 = 195 vph(Vc4) .Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 5.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp ' (% of Cp utilised and Impedance Factor ~ CF~4= 895 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Fi ~ (V4/Cp4)x100= .9% P4= -99 ___________________________( g.10.5) Cm4=CP4= 895 h STEP-3---LT From-Minor Street=====______~_____________===pCP=====_______________ Conflicting Flows Vc___________________~__________=~=\=V?====__________------- ' 1/2 V3+V2+V5+V4= Critical Ga Tc pa ~ 6 + 184 + 450 + 7 = 647 vph(Vc7) Potential Capacity, Cp ~ Tc= 8 secs (Tab-10.2) Actual-Capacity__Cm_____________________'_Cp7=--274 pcph (Fig-10_3) Cm7=Cp?xP4= 274~x .99 271 Pcph SHARED LANE C __________ _____________________ ____ APACITY SH = (V7+V9)/((V7/Cm7)+(V9/Cm9)) if lane is shared- r CR Mr~VEMENT----V(pCPH)--_-CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) CM_ CR LOS LOS --------- ------------------- ( V)~ (CSH-V) CM CSH ,~.w 9 21 J----730 -------------------239=====______=====C=====_-_ 4 8 ..~ ..w.,- -- ~ 895 709 A ~~ 887 A i LUCATION:SOUTH ENTRANCE AT LOCUST GROVE ;NAME:SUMMERFIELD ---------- ' -'^T)RLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPH N ' Major street:L000ST GROVE ~ ; N= 1 <---V5--- 156 ; c---V5--- Grade 255---V2---> v---V4--- 12 ---V2---> v---V4--- 13 ! 0% 19---V3---v N= 1 ---V3---v Darts- ounts : ~ ~ • X003 V7 V9 X STOP V7 V9 Time Period: ; YIELD ; M ~ 11 7i i ~ 12 8 ~'~ Approac peed; Minor Street: Grade ; '; 35 SOUTH ENTRANCE 0% ; PHF: .9 N= 2 Population: 100000 .:.VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Movement no. ; 2 ; 3 4 5 ; 7 ; 9 ; Volume (vph) 255 19 12 156 11 ; 7 ; t Vol(pcph),see-Table-101;XXXXXXXX;XXXXXXXX;----13--;XY.XXXXXX;----12--;-----8--; t STEP 1 RT From Minor Street /-> V9 ------- ------------------------------------- .._nflicting Flows, Vc ; 1/2 V3+V2= lU + 255 = 265 vph(Vc9) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 6.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp9= 662 pcph (Fig.10.3) ~ _ Actual Capacity, Cm , Cm9=Cp9- 662 pcph -------------------------------------------------- STEP 2 LT From Major Street v-- V4 --------------------------------- -------------- Conflicting Flows, Vc V3+V2= 19 + 255 = 274 vph(Vc4) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 5.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp4= 812 pcph (Fig.10.3) of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor (V4/Cp4)x100= 1.6% P4= .99 • Actual Capacity, Cm (Fig.10.5) Cm4=Cp4= 812 pcph STEP 3 LT From Minor Street <- V7 -------------------------------- Conflicting Flows, Vc 1/2 V3+V2+V5+V4= 10 + 255 + 156 + 12 = 433 vph(Vc7) Critical Gap, Tc~ Tc= 8 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp ; Cpl= 390 pcph (Fig.10.3) r Actual Capacity, Cm ; Cm7=Cp7xP4= 390 •x .99 = 386 pcph SHAREL LANE CAPACITY SH = (V7+V9)/((V7/Cm7)+(V9/Cm9)) if lane is shared CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) CM CSH • 7 12 386 374 B :, 9 8 662 654 A 4 13 812 799 A LOCATION:NORTH ENTRANCE AT LOCUST GROVE ;NAME:SUMMERFIELD SUB. --------------------------- ~-"'URLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPH • N Major street:L000ST GROVE N- 1 - ---<---VS--- 174 Grade 191---V2---> v---V4--- 4 0% 5---V3---v N= 1 Counts: ' ' 2003 V7 V9 X STOP Time F riod: ; YIELD AM ; 15 10 pproach Speed: Minor Street: Grade <---VS--- ---V2---> v---V4--- 4 ---V3---v ,~ ~~ ~r , V7 V9 ; 17 11; 35 NORTH ENTRANCE 0% ; PHF: .9 N= 1 Population: 100000 ----------------------------------------------------------- VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS ----------------------- Movement no. -------------- ; 2 ------------------------------ 3 4 5 7 ------------ 9 ; ----------------------- --------------- Volume (vph) ; 191 ----------------------------- 5 4 174 15 ------------ ' 10 ----------------------- --------------- ------------ , Vol(pcph),see Table 10. 1;XXXXXXXX;XXX ----------------- XXXXX; 4 ;XXXXXXXX; 17 ------------ 11 ; STEP 1 RT From Minor ------------- Street --------------~-> V9--------- ; ------------ nflicting Flows, Vc -------------- ----------------------------- ; 1/2 V3+V2= 3 + 191 = 194 ------------ vph(Vc9) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 5.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp9= 896 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm9=Cp9= 896 pcph STEP 2 LT From Ma~ior --------- Street ----------------------------- v-- V4 ------------ i~:onflicting Flows, Vc ------- ----------------------------------------- V3+V2= 5 + 191 = 196 vph(Vc4) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp4= 984 pcph (Fig.lU.3) :o of Cp uti.lized and Impedance Factor ; (V4/Cp4)x100= .4% P4= 1 Actual Capacity, Cm (Fig.lU.5) Cm4=Cp4= 984 pcph STEP 3 LT From Minor - --------- Street ------------------------------ <-\ V7 ------------ Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 2 V3+V2+V5+V4- 3 + 191 + 174 + 4 = 372 vph(Vc?) ritical Gap, Tc Tc= 6.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cpl= 580 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm7=Cp?xP4= 580 •x 1 = 580 pcph -- SHARED LANE CAPACITY -------------------------------------------- SH = (V7+V9)/((V7/Cm7)+(V9/Cm9)) if lane is ------------ shared CR CR LOS LOS M~~VEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) CM CSH 7 17 580 673 563 645 A 9 11 896 673 885 645 A A 4 4 984 980 A ~OCATION:NORTH ENTRANCE AT LOCUST GROVE ;NAME:SUMMERFIELD SUB. i'^TJRLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPH N ' Ma~ior street:L000ST GROVE Grade 214---V2---> v---V4--- 12 ---V2---> v---V4--- 1~~ 0% 18---V3---v N= 1 ---V3---v t f Counts: 2003 V7 V9 X STOP V7 V9 ; Time eriod: YIELD ' PM 11 7; 12 8; pproach Speed: Minor Street: Grade ; 35 NORTH ENTRANCE 0 PHF: .9 N= 1 Population: 100000 ---------------------------------------------------- VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Movement no. ; 2 3 4 5 ; ? 9 ; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uolume (vph) 214 ; 18 12 15? 11 7 ; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vol(pcph),see Table 10.1;XXXXXXXX;XXY,XXXXX; 13 ;XXXXXXXX; 12 8 ; - -------------------------V9--------------------- STEP 1 RT From Minor Street /-> ---------------------------------------------p-(-------- .iflicting Flows, Vc ; 1/2 V3+V2= 9 + 214 = 223 v h Vc9) `Critical Gap, Tc ; Tc= 5.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp9= 866 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm9=Cp9= 866 pcph STEP 2 LT From Major Street-----------,-----------v-- V4--------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows, Vc V3+V2= 18 + 214 = 232 vph(Vc4) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 5 secs (Tab.lU.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp4= 95G pcph (Fig.10.3) 30 of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor (V4/Cp4)x1UU= 1.4:o P4= .99 Actual Capacity, Cm (Fig.lU.5) Cm4=Cp4= 95U pcph -------------------------\-V?--------------------- STEP S LT From Minor Street f~- Conflicting Flows, Vc 1/~ V3+V2+V5+V4- 9 + 214 + 157 + 12 = 392 vph(Vc7) ~:ritical Gap, Tc Tc= b.5 secs (Tab.lU.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cpl= 566 pcph (Fig.1U.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm7=Cp7xP4= 566 •x .99 = 560 pcph ------------------------------------------------------------ SHAREU LANE CAPACITY SH = (V7+V9)/((V7/Cm7)+(V9/Cm9)) if lane is shared CR CR LOS LOS Mr~VEMENT V(PCPH) CMIPCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) CM CSH 7 12 560 65~ 548 632 A S 8 866 652 858 632 A A 4 13 950 937 A LOCATION:LOCUST GROVE AND USTICK NAME:SUMMERFIELL -------------------- .HOURLY VOLUMES ---------- ----- Grade --------- 0% ----------------------------------- N = 1 4 V12 " 44 N V11 ; 6 ------------ ---- --- ,. ~ v1o ---------------------- Grade 0% ~----------VS-- 173 N= 1 13 --V1--- ---------" v----------V4-- 36 86 --V2--- ---------> major road Grade 0 21 --V3--- ---------v <; ;> USTICK RD. _____________ _________ V? ______________________ 10 ; STOP x~: V8 YIELD N= 1 54 Date of Cou s:1993 V9 Time Perio :PM minor road 16 Prevailing a :45 LOCUST GROVE PHF:.9 Grade 0 % Population:100000 VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS - ---- --------- ----------------------------------- -------------------- Movement no . -------------------- ---------- 1 ; 2 ; ---------- ----- 3 ; ----- --------- 4 5 ------- ----------------------------------- 6 ? ; 8 9 1U ; 11 12 Volume (vph) ------------------ 13; 86; ---------- 21; ----- -- 36; 173; ---------- ----------------------------------- 34; 10; 54; 16; 6; 44; 4 ------------ 1(pcph),Tab.lU.l; 14;XXXX;XXXX; ---------------------- 40;XXXX;XXXX; 11; 59; 18; 7; 48; 4; VOLUMES IN PCPH 14 --V1------------" __ --V2------------> __ --V3------------v 4 V12 48 V11 7 V1U <; v ;> <; V7 11 VS 59 ----------V6-- __ <----------V5-- __ v----------V4-- 40 ~~ V9 . 18 LOCATION:LOGUST GROVE AND USTICk NAME:SUMMERFIELD ------------ ----------- STEP 1 RT ------------ ------------------ ------------------- From Minor Street ------------------ -------------------- -------------------- ; /-> V9 -------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- <-/ V12 ----------------------------- ------------ ~flicting ------------------ Flows, Vc -------------------- 1/2 V3+V2=Vc9 ----------------------------- 1/2 V6+V5=Vc12 Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3) of Cp utilized Impedance Factor, P (Fig.10.5) Actual Capacity, Cm 11+ 86= 97 vph 6.5 (secs.) Cp9 = 823 pcph (V9/Cp9)x100= 2.2% P9= .99 Cm9=Cp9= 823 pcph 17+ 173= 190 vph 6.5 (secs.) Cp12 = 730 pcph (V12/Cp12)X100= .5°0 P12= 1 Cm12=Cp12= 73U pcph ------------ ----------- STEP 2 LT ----------- ----------- ------------ From Major ------------ -------------------------- -------------------------- Street ; v-- V4 -------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------ --" V1 ------------------------------ ----------- Conflicting ------------ Flows, Vc -------------------------- V3+V2=Vc4 ------------------------------ V6+V5=Vc1 Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3); % of Cp utilized ; Impedance Factor, P (Fig.10.5); Actual .Capacity, Cm ; 21+ 86= 107 vph 5.5 (secs.) Cp4 = 988 pcph (V4/Cp4)x100= 4% P4= .98 Cm4=Cp4= 988 pcph 34+ 173= 207 vph 5.5 (secs.) Cpl = 883 pcph (V1/Cpl x100= 1.6% P1= .99 Cml=Cpl= 883 pcph ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STEP 3 TH From Minor Street V8 v V11 --------------------- --------------------- Conflicting Flows, Vc "~itical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) tential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3) of Cp utilized Impedance Factor, P (Fig.10.5) Actual Capacity, Cm ------------------------- ------------------------- .5V3+V2+V1+V6+V5+V4=Vc81 11+ 86+ 13+ 34+ ', 173+ 36= 353 vph ', 7.5 (secs.) Cp8 = 490 pcph ' (V8/Cp8)x100= 12% ', P8= .92 Cm8=Cp8xP1xP4 ', 475= 490x.99x.98pcph .5V6+V5+V4+V3+V2+V1=Vc11 17+ 173+ 36+ 21+ 86+ 13= 346 vgh 7.5 (secs.) Cpll = 496 pcph (V11/Cpll)x100= 9.7% P11= .94 Cm11=Cp11xP1xP4 481= 496x.99x.98pcph ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STEP 4 LT From Minor Street ~-\ V7 \-> V10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows, Vc Vc8(step3)+V11+V12=Vc7; Vcll(step3)+V8+V9=Vc1G 353+ 44+ 4= 441vph 346+ 54+ 16= 416vph Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.l0.2) ; 8 (secs.] 8 (secs.) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3); Cpl = 409 pcph Cp10 = 400 pcph Actual Capacity, Cm Cm7=Cp7xP1xP4xP11xP12 Cm10=Cp10xP4xP1xP8xP9 = 409x.99x.98x.94x 1 = 400x.98x.99x.92x.99 = 373 pcph = 353 pcph LOCATION:LOCUST GROVE AND USTICK NAME:SUMMERFIELD SHARED LANE CAPACITY APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7,8,9 CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V{PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) CM CSH 7 11 ---373----------501----- -- ---362 -------- 413 -- - ---B --A-- ------ ~ 8 59 475 501 416 413 A A j 9 18 823 501 805 413 A A APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10,11,12 CR ~ CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT - - V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) -- (CSH-V) ----- CM CSH ~ 10 ---------- 7 -----353------------------ 472 --------- 346 ---- ---------- 413 ------- ------- B ----- --A-- 11 48 481 472 433 413 A A 12 r 4 730 472 726 413 A A ~' MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4 MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CR(CM-V) LOS ~, 1 14 - -- ---------- 883 ---869---- --------- ---A--- ----- 4 40 988 948 A COMMENTS: LOCATION:LOCUST GROVE ANU USTICK NAME:SUMMERFIELU .STEP 1 RT From Minor Street-,------/-> V9----------_~_-__=~_~=V12=====______- lflicting Flows, Vc ; 1/2 V3+V2=Vc9 1/2 V6+V5=Vc12 5+ 122= 127 vph 4+ 81= 85 vph Critical Gap, Tc {Tab.10.2) ; 6.5 (secs.) ; 6.5 (secs.) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3); Cp9 = 793 pcph Cp12 = 834 pcph of Cp utilized (V9/Cp9)x100= 6,4% (V12/Cp12)x100= .7% Impedance Factor, P (Fig.10.5); P9= .96 P12= 1 Actual Capacity, Cm Cm9=Cp9= 793 pcph Cm12=Cp12= 834 pcph STEP 2 LT From Mayor Street ; v-- V4 -- V1 Conflict n ~ ___________________~________________________ i g Flows, Vc V3+V2 Vc4 V6+V5-Vcl 10+ 122= 132•vph 8+ B1= 89 vph Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) 5.5 (secs.) 5.5 (secs.) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3); Cp4 = 961 pcph Cpl = 1000 pcph % of Cp utilized (V4/Cp4)x100= 1.9°r~ (V1/Cpl x100= .?% Impedance Factor, P (Fig.10.5); P4= .99 P1= 1 Actual Capacity, Cm Cm4=Cp4= 961 pcph Cml=Cg1= 1000 pcph ----- ---------- STEP 3 TH From Minor Street V8 v V11 ------------------------------- -------- Conflicting Flows, Vc ;,5V3+V2+V1+V6+V5+V4=Vc8;.5V6+V5+V4+V3+V2+V1=Vc11 . 5+ 122+ 6+ 8+ 4+ B1+ 16+ 10+ 81+ 16= 238 vph ~ 122+ 6= 239 vph r~itical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) 7,5 (secs.) 7.5 (secs.) cential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3); Cp8 = 580 pcph Cpll = 579 pcph % of Cp utilized (V8/Cp8)x100= 9.5% (V11/Cpll)x100= 6.4% Impedance Factor, P (Fig.10.5); P8= .94 P11= .96 Actual Capacity, Cm Cm8=Cp8xP1xP4 Cm11=Cp11xP1xP4 574= 580x 1x.99pcph 573= 579x 1x.99pcph ----- aTEP 4 LT From Minor Street <-~ V? > V10 Conflicting Flows, Vc Vc8 ste 3 +V11+V12=Vc7; Vcll(step3)+V8+V9-Vc10 238+ 34+ 5= 277vph 239+ 50+ 46= 335vph Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) 8 (secs.) 8 (secs.) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3); Cpl = 506 pcph ; Cp10 = 459 pcph Actual Capacity, Cm Cm7=Cp7xP1xP4xP11xP12 Cm10=Cp14xP4xF1xP8xP9 = 506x 1x.99x.96x 1 = 459x.99x 1x.94x.96 = 481 pcph ; = 410 pcph ,~ LOCATION:LOCUST GROVE AND USTICK NAME:SUMMERFIELL SHARED LANE CAPACITY '~ APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7,8,9 CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) CM CSH 7 8 ---------------------------- 481 645 473 ---------- 531 ------ A --- ------ A 8 55 574 645 519 531 A A 9 51 793 645 742 531 A A APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10,11,12 CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) ----------------------------- (CSH-V) --------- CM CSH 10 29 410 505 381 433 ------- B --A-- 11 37 573 505 536 433 A A 12 6 834 505 828 433 A A MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4 MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CR(CM-V) LOS 1 7 --------------993---- 1000 --------- ---A--- ----- 4 18 961 943 A COMMENTS: LOCATION:LOCUST GROVE AND USTICK NAME:SUMMERFIELD =•HOURLY VOLUMES Grade 0% ~ N = 1 ' 6 ' ~ , ,. , V12 ~ " 151 N V11 ; ' ' ' lU ' ---------------------- V10 ---------------------- N= 1 <' v '> ----------V6-- 4~ Grade 0% <----------V5-- 243 N= 1 22 --V1------------" v----------V4-- 9~ 122 --V2------------> major road Grade 0% 3Ei --V3------------v <; ;> USTICk RD. ---------------------- V7 ~ ~ ---------------------- 13 ; ; STOP y:~: VB YIELD N= 1 180 Date of C nts:2003 V9 Time Peri d:PM minor road 75 Prevailing pee :45 LOCUST GROVE PHF:.9 Grade 0 % Population:l00000 ----------------------------------------------------------- VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS ----------------------- Movement no . 1 2 3 4 5 6 ; ? ; 8 ; 9 10 11 12 ; volume (vph) ; 22; 122; 36; 93; 243; 42; 13; 18U; ?5; 10; 151; 6 1(pcph),Tab.10.1; 24;XXY.X;Y~XXX; 102;XXXX;XXXX; 14; 198; 83; 11; 166; 7 VOLUMES IN PCPH ; 7 V12 ; 166 ; V11 ; ' ' 11 ' ---------------------- V10 --------------------- ---------------------- <~ v > --------------------- "----------V6-- -- <----------V5-- __ 24 --V1------------" v----------V4-- 102 __ --V2------------> -- .~ ~ -- -- ~------------V ., ~> ---------------------- V7 ~ ~ ---------------------- ' 14 ' ' V8 ; 198 ; V9 83 ; LOCATION:L000ST GROVE AND USTICK NAME:SUMMERFIELL STEP 1 RT From Minor Street-, ------/-> V9---------- -, -----<-/-V12=====____-_- ------------------ ---------------------- -- ------------ - ' inflicting Flows, Vc , 1 2 V3+V2-Vc9 - ---------- 1 2 V6+V5-Vcll 18+ 122= 140 vph ; 21+ 243= 264 vph Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) ; 6.5 (secs.) 6.5 (secs.) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3); Cp9 = 780 pcph Cp12 = 662 pcph of Cp utilized (V9/Cp9)x100= 10.6% (V12/Cp12)x100= l.l:o { Impedance Factor, P (Fig.10.5); P9= .94 P12= 99 ' Actual Capacity, Cm ; Cm9=Cp9= 780 pcph ; . Cm12=Cp1:%= 662 pcph ------- STEP 2 : LT From Major Street ---------------------- v-- V4 -f ------------------------ --° V1 - Conflicting Flows, Vc --------------------- V3+V2=Vc4 -- ------------------------ V6+V5=Vc1 Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3) % of Cp utilized Impedance Factor, P (Fig.10.5) Actual Capacity, Cm 36+ 122= 158 vph 5.5 (secs.) Cp4 = 934 pcph (V4/Cp4)x100= 10.9% P4= .93 Cm4=Cp4= 934 pcph 42+ 243= 285 vph 5.5 (secs.) Cpl = 801 pcph (V1/Cpl)x106= 3% P1= .98 Cml=Cpl= 801 pcph STEP 3 TH From Minor Street ; V8 v V11 ------------------------------------------------ Conflicting Flows, Vc ;.5V3+V2+V1+V6+V5+V4=Vc8;.5V6+V5+V4+V3+V2+V1=Vc11 18+ 122+ 22+ 42+ ; 21+ 243+ 93+ 36+ 243+ 93= 540 vph ; 122+ 22= 537 vph r„itical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) ; ?.5 (secs.) ; 7.5 (secs.) ~ential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3); Cp8 = 366 pcph Gpll = 368 pcph of Cp utilized (V8/Cp8)x100= 54.1% (V11/Cpll)x100= 45.1% Impedance Factor, P (Fig.10.5); P8= .54 ; P11= .62 Actual Capacity, Cm Cm8=Cp8xP1xP4 4 ~ Cm11=Cp11xP1xF4 334= 366x.98x.93pcph ; 335= 368x.98x.93pcph STEP 4 LT From Minor Street <-\ V7 > V10 ------------------ Conflicting Flows, Vc -----------------------~ Vc8(step3)+V11+V12=Vc7' -----(---P--------_----- Vcll ste 3)+V8+V9-Vc10 540+ 151+ 6= 697vph 537+ 18G+ 75= 792vph Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) ; 8 (secs.) 8 (secs.) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3); Cpl = 251 pcph Cp10 = 209 pcph Actual Capacity, Cm Cm7=Cp7xP1xP4xP11xP12 ; Cm10=Cp1UxP4xP1xP8xP9 = 251x.98x.93x.62x.99 ; = 209x.93x.98x.54x.94 = 140 pcph ; = 9? pcph I LOCATION:L000ST GROVE AND USTICK NAME:SUMMERFIELD SHARED LANE CAPACITY •~~ APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7,8,9 CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) CM CSH 7 14 - -----140----------369----- ---126--- _____74___ ___D__ ___E_= 8 198 334 369 136 74 D E 9 83 780 369 697 ?4 A E APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10,11,12 CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) CM CSH 10 11 ----9?----------297----- ----86---- ---113--- ==_E=== ==L== 11 166 335 297 169 113 D D 12 7 662 297 655 113 A D MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4 MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CR(CM-V) LOS 1 24 -- ----------------- 801 ---777---- --------- ------- A ----- 4 102 934 832 A COMMENTS: LOCATION:L000ST GROVE AND USTICK NAME:SUMMERFIELD -------------------- ~OURLY VOLUMES ---------- ----- Grade --------- 0% ---- -- ------------------------ ----- N = 1 ; 15 ; V12 ; " 105 N V11 ; ' ' 80 ' ------------- --------- ~ V10 - --------------- ------ N- 1 <; v ;> -V6-- 13 Grade 0% <----------VS-- 166 N= 1 11 --V1------------" v----------V4-- 24 223 --V2------------> major road Grade 0% 18 --V3------------v <; ;> USTICK RD. _____________ _________ V7 ' _ _____________________ 24 STOP xx V8 ; YIELD '' N= 1 167 ; ; Date of Counts: 003 V9 ; Time Period:AM minor road 154 ; Prevailing ed:45 LOCUST GROVE ; PHF:.9 Grade 0 % Population:100000 VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS -------------------- Movement no . ; ---------- 1 ; 2 ; ----- 3 ; ----=---- 4 ; 5 ---- 6 -- ; ------------------------- 7 ; 8 ; 9 10 11 ; ---- 12 ; - ------------------ ---------- ----- --------- ---- -- --- - Volume (vph) ------------------ 11; 223; --- - 18; 24; 166; 13 ; ---------------------- 24; 167; 154; 80; 105; ---- 15 .l(pcph),Tab.l0.1; -- --------- 12;XXXX;XXXX; --------- 26;XXXX; ------- XXXX; ------------------------ 26; 184; 169; 88; 116; ---- 17; VOLUMES IN PCPH ; 12 --V1------------' __ --V2------------> __ --V3------------v 17 V12 116 V11 88 V10 <; v ;> <; V7 26 V8 164 ----------V6-- __ <----------V5-- __ v----------V4-- 26 ~> V9 169 ; LOCATION:LOCUST GROVE AND USTICK NAME:SUMMERFIELD •~TEP 1 RT From Minor Street ; /-> V9 <- V12 --------------------1--~-------_------------- zflicting Flows, Vc 1/2 V3+V2=Vc9 1 2 V6+V5-Vc12 9+ 223= 232 vph ; 7+ 166= 173 vph Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) ; 6.5 (secs.) ; 6.5 (secs.) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3); Cp9 = 691 pcph Cp12 = ?47 pcph of Cp utilized ; (V9/Cp9)x100= 24.5% (V12/Cp12)x100= 2.390 Impedance Factor, P (Fig.10.5); P9= .82 P12= .99 •Actual Capacity, Cm Cm9=Cp9= 691 pcph Cm12=Cp12= 747 pcph STEP 2 LT From Ma3or Street ; v-- V4 -- V1 Conflicting Flows, Vc V3+V2=Vc4 V6+V5=Vc1 18+ 223= 241 vph ; 13+ 166= 179 vph Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) 5.5 (secs.) 5.5 (secs.) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3); Cp4 = 847 pcph Cpl = 912 pcph of Cp utilized ; (V4/Cp4)x100= 3.1% (V1/Cpl)x100= 1.390 Impedance Factor, P (Fig.10.5); P4= .98 P1= .99 Actual Capacity, Cm ; Cm4=Cp4= 84? pcph ; Cml=Cpl= 912 pcph STEP 3 TH From Minor Street Conflicting Flows, Vc 'Y itical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) tential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3) of Cp utilized Impedance Factor, P (Fig.10.5) Actual Capacity, Cm V8 v V11 -- ------------------------ .5V3+V2+V1+V6+V5+V4=Vc8;.5V6+V5+V4+V3+V2+V1=Vc11 9+ 223+ 11+ 13+ ; 7+ 166+ 24+ 18+ 166+ 24= 446 vph 223+ 11= 449 vph 7.5 (secs.) 7.5 (secs.) Cp8 = 425 pcph Cpll = 423 pcph (V8/Cp8)x100= 43.3% (V11/Cpll)x100= 27.4% P8= .64 P11= .79 Cm8=Cp8xP1xP4 Cm11=Cp11xP1xP4 412= 425x.99x.98pcph 410= 423x.99x.98pcph ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STEP 4 LT From Minor Street <-~ V7 ~-> V10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows, Vc ; Vc8(step3)+V11+V12=Vc7; Vcll(step3)+V8+V9=Vc10 446+ 105+ 15= 566vph 449+ 167+ 154= 77Gvph Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2) ; 8 (secs.) 8 (secs.) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3); Cpl = 314 pcph Cp1U = 219 pcph Actual Capacity, Cm Cm7=Cp7xP1xP4xP11xP12 Cm10=Cp10xP4xP1xP8xP9 = 314x.99x.98x.79x.99 = 219x.98x.99x.64x_82 = 238 pcph ; = 112 pcph LOCATION:LOCUST GROVE AND USTICK NAME:SUMMERFIELL SHARED LANE CAPACITY APPROACH MOVEMENTS ?,8,9 CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) CM CSH 7 26 -----238------------------ 474 --------- 212 ---------- 95 ------- C ----- --E-- 8 184 412 474 228 95 C E 9 169 691 474 522 95 A E APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10,11,12 CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V) (CSH-V) CM CSH 10 88 112 202 G4 -19 E F 11 116 410 202 294 -19 C F 12 17 747 202 730 -19 A F MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,9 MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CR(CM-V) LOS 1 12 ----------------- 912 ---------- 900 --------- ------- A ----- 4 26 847 ~ 821 A COMMENTS: .~ r APPENDIX C s PLAT SHOWING S UMMERFIELD N0. LOCATED IN 1 X PORTIONS OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 AND THE SW 1/4 OF. THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 12. T.3N.. R.IE.. B.M., BOISE ADA COUNTY. IDAHO 1993 ,~ sciu.e: ~' • too• : ~ ~ ~ s s i~ _i,( . I , ~ ~ s n ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ • -~' s s • s __ '0 a u ~ n I ,~~~ ~^ • • . ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ .~ / ~~ ~ a . t . ~ , ~ s ~ ~~, ~ a 1 . ~ ~ m a ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ :. . ~ ~ I ~ Meridian City Council April 18, 1995 Page 20 Subdivision No. 2 conditioned upon the receipt of the letter of credit and the letter of approval from Nampa Meridian Irrigation District, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #12: REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION ON SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT: Kingsford: Who is the engineer representing that? Shari, what is the scoop on that? Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, Summerfield No. 2 and No. 3 just barely got through the system and are now being recorded. So their next phase will be beyond the year required to submit a final. So they are requesting a 1 year extension for the final plat of Summerfield No. 4. Kingsford: Any other questions? Morrow: They are requesting a one year extension? Kingsford: Is that what you said Shari, one year? Tolsma: Mr. Mayor I would request that we grant the time extension on Summerfield Subdivison Final Plat for one year. Morrow: Moved by Ron, second by Walt to approve the time extension for Summe~eld Subdivision No. 4 final plat for one year, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #13: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: TUTHILL ESTATES NO.2 SUBDIVISION: Kngsford: Shari, you guys have reviewed that and now we have a signed copy? Entertain a motion to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and attest that. Yerrington: So moved Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and. attest the Tuthill Estates Subdivision No. 2 development agreement, all those in favor? Opposed? • • Meridian City Council April 18, 1995 Page 20 Subdivision No. 2 conditioned upon the receipt of the letter of credit and the letter of approval from Nampa Meridian Irrigation District, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #12: REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION ON SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT: Kingsford: Who is the engineer representing that? Shari, what is the scoop on that? Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, Summerfield No. 2 and No. 3 just barely got through the system and are now being recorded. So their next phase will be beyond the year required to submit a final. So they are requesting a 1 year extension for the final plat of Summerfield No. 4. Kingsford: Any other questions? Morrow: They are requesting a one year extension? Kingsford: Is that what you said Shari, one year? Tolsma: Mr. Mayor I would request that we grant the time extension on Summerfield Subdivison Final Plat for one year. Morrow: Moved by Ron, second by Walt to approve the time extension for Summerfield Subdivision No. 4 final plat for one year, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #13: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: TUTHILL ESTATES N0.2 SUBDIVISION: Kngsford: Shari, you guys have reviewed that and now we have a signed copy? Entertain a motion to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and attest that. Yerrington: So moved Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and attest the Tuthill Estates Subdivision No. 2 development agreement, all those in favor? Opposed? • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: APRIL 18.1996 APPLICANT ITEM NUMBER; 12 REQUEST: REQUEST FOR A TIME EXTENSIQN ON SUMMERFiELD SUBDMSION FINAL PLAT AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ~/~ ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ,,,~p( ~ ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: ~ ~ ~ " CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: ~~ ~` BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ~, Ma~riais presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. a • ,`~ ENGJIyF~ `~ 9~ RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. 9~ ay 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 8:1709 208J322-8992 ^ Fax 208/378-0329 April 5, 1995 qty of Meridian Ms. Shari Stiles, Planning ~ Zoning Administrator 33 Fast Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 ItE: Summerfield Subdivision IDear Shari, ®n behalf of Summerfield 13evelopment we hereby request an extension of tune on the f~7ing of the last phase final plate for the above mentioned project. This is being requested in accordance with the Meridian City Subdivision Ordinance 9-604 (F~ (3). Thank you for your time and consideration, and please advise me as to which City Council hearing this request will be heard Sincerely, ~ ~~,~~~ Tracey Pers ns Project Coordinator cc: Gary Voigt ~~ tp~148.1tr HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICEGASS.Treasurer CITY OF MERIDIA I~T COUNCILMEN R A BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. . RO ERTGI SLER WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MAX YERRINGTON JOHN SHAWCROFT. Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ROBERT D. CORRIE BILL GORDON, Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 Chairman Zoning 6 Planning JIM JOHNSON GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 Centennial Coordinator GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your corn ants and r commendations will be considered by the Meridian may we have your answer by: r- TRANSMITTAL DATE : _~ _,_,~'r~..~~ ~E~ING DATE : ~_~~1 L~la3 c^ ,,, :Z RE9UEST: ~i Ina. ~ln~ c ~, .t~.,w~~lr^~. ~~rl ~:_~ ~ I JIM JOHNSON P/Z ~~_MERIDIAN SCIi~OI OISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI,P/I ~~IERIDIAN POxt OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) ;, JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY D€STRICT :..--- CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z v.....~ . ~ ,.~:~.,- ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P1Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HE~tl.TH GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR:aDISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS ISR'IGATIOl+E°DISTRICT BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER.Cq;~(`pRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BOB GIESLER, C/C °. ..°_,-._~FrS: WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) MAX YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. CITY FILES BUILDING INSPECTOR OTHER FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER FILE COPY REG~UEST FUR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING C01iMISSION FINAL PLAT TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: A request for preliminary plat appz-oval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Gommission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request vas made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures ar,d documentation are received before 5:0fo P. ?1. , Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission, action,. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision, Summerfield Subdivision No. 1 2. General Location. _SPrr; n *, ~~, 'f_4~; R 7F R_!~!_, utPTl[~la n, Aria ri•!!m*C 3. Ovr,ers of record, See attached list Address,. .Zip Telephone ~. Applicant, G.L. Voigt Address,P.O. Box 2044. Idaho Falls. ID 83403 5. Engineer.. James C. Markle, P.E. Firm Hubble Engineering , Inc. Address 9550 Bethel Court. Boise. IpZip 83709 Telephone (208)322-8992 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name Av~licant Address Telephone PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres 21.69 2. Number of lots 71 3. Lots per acre 3.3 •i 4. Density per acre 3.3 5. Zoning Classif ication t e) R-4 •~- - -:i q • - i ~. ~ ^`i; .~n.• 6. If the proposed Subdivision is outside the ?leridian City Limits but vitriin the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification R-4 7. Does the plat border a potential greer belt *~~ b. Have recreational easements been provided for Ac. 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to tre C_ ~z '~_ Explain 1~. Are there proposed dedications of comme~ aTe~? c== Expla, n r---a-,-~ ~ -,,~~~~_ - .,~ -- For future parks? 1:o Explain 11. What school (s ) service the area Meridian do you propose any agreements for future school sites No Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the City Ao Mater Supply Fire Department Sanitary Sewer Other _ . Explain :_. Ts pe of 8uzld~nc t F~=denti..a1. Comme::=_.s'_. Z~-+~9~®-- _ ,~- ec~~inat~c:. ) Rzside-tia~ I+4. Type of Lve112ng c s i Ssngle Family. Duplexe=, ?i;:::~,r._e~_ CLis~: __ - _ - w 15. Proposed Development features: s. ?Sirimum square footage of lot t s) , 8~~~± sc~:are fee: b. l:ir.~aum square footage of structure t s ) ~50^ sc::are rte- c. Are garages provides for, Yes square footage 42G s~z:are . c . -~ d. Are other coverings provided for No e. Landscaping has been provided for Yes . Describe Covenants require landscaping ;~ t2) A~ f. Trees will be provided for Yes Trees will be maintained Homeowners li ~i g. Sprinkler systems are provided for No h. Are there ®ultiple units Yes Type remarks__This project will be phased i. Are there special set back requirements Fo Explain j. Has off street parking been provided fer tic .Explain k. Value range of property $130.000 - $190,000 1. Type of financing for development Standard m. Protective covenants were submitted No ,Date 16. Does the proposal land lock other property Fo Does it create Enclaves No STATEMENTS OF CO?iPLIANCE: 1. Streets. curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constrvctQc to standards as required by Ada County Highway District a::c ?ieridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be detergined by ta-.F City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet ~. width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of tleridiar. .Comprehensive Plan. 3. Development will connect to City services. 4. Development rill comply rith City Ordinances. ~. Preliminary Plat rill include all appropriate easements. 6. Street names must not conflict rith City grid system. ~~ (3) `;•F~ SUMIV~ERFIELD SUBDIVISION NO. 1 RECORD OWNERS Raymond Arte 3610 N. Locust Grove, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Ustick 40 Partnership 2820 E. Ustick Road, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Venna Vaughn, Trustee 2180 E. Ustick Road, Meridian, Idaho 83642 ,h• ... .~.... May S, 1993 •• ~P.2i6 • '~~~ ~~~~ . Mr. Bill Vaugh 1769? Cassia Tree Lane Irvine, CA 92715 RE: Approximately 19+j~ care Ages on Ust:.~k Road Dear All y Mr. Gary Voigt agrees to purchase 19•/- acres located in the Kest 1/2, of the SE 1/+, o! Lhe SW 1/i, Or SecLlon 32 2ovnahip ~N, AangB lE of the Bli. It is undar6tood the property is approximately 19 bate acres and a torfial legal description will be ettaahed as Exhibit ~A"_ 1. Pr ce Tha pilrchaee price shall be FIFTEEN Tl1UVSAt1p DDGLARS AND on/ioD (515,000.00) per developable acre of lend. Tht buyer will not be pt~rchesinq any property in the Ustic:k Aoad Right vE Kay. • 2. ems All cash at c:loaing ~ . Rev ew perl.od . (A) Immediately upah acceptance, the Vattgh Estate shall deliver to Gary Voigt one (i) full set of docents listod in Exhibit *B^. Z'h~ baser st:ali have 9o days tr~a sellers acceptance {Yevlev period) during which to rE~-i-~•' the documents and make detailed physical inspectio~as o,` the property. Alter the date of acceptance c~ t.~a.is letter o! intent the employees, agenCs or consultants for Cary Voigt. shall b~, VrantPd a tight of dntry to Eha -- - properties to inspect the physical condition thereof and to perform studies and tests. (b) The buyers approval of the documents and the property is a condition of~his obligations hereunder end if approved shall be $videnced by a written notice signed by•the ~ - buyer an~~dalivered to the eellpr at the conclusion of prarioti. In ths~ =,:view. the event the buyer disnpprovesa . Any docu~neht or oriy poxt ian of the property or detet~eines '~~ that the purch~-se ie not econo~aicaily t+sa6lbie this • agreescnt shall become nt111 and void and the Escrnt+ d td ` Ospotai.t deacrlbed below shall be iaunediatel.y returne ~ ' the buyer. P~r~c Poin~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ R~96K /_` / -" "• '•- ' ~ 208 52A 8965 05-OB=~3•••~~'~X~~P002 t t p28 •• 0 CO .F. Alay 5, 199] Mr. Bill Vaugh Raga Tvo P. 3~6 .{. Q~~r tetYe~ „end ccitldixls~~ (A) Annexation to tht City at Naridiar~ by September 30, 1993. (8) Clean environmental review assesse+aent. 5 - in ~.~Yg... purDhas_~~glee~+ent,_ 'This letter is a binding contract subject to the terms and conditions hereof and to the preparation of the DefiniCive' Purchase Agrees~ent Mb.P.ll" containing tartan alutually acceptab2a to the parties ns [ollcwa- CAI ~D P.A~.f in a m~tuelly ac eptabl pforteconsiatantev th the terms and provisiers hereof. This agreement shall be merged into and superePCl~ by suc?~ Oafinitiva Purchas=e Agreement. (B) The Definitlsrb Purchase Agreement shall be prepared by Craig Groves end shall be deliverA~1 to all parties on or bo:~ore August a5, 1991. 6. ~~,crola Dg~~t_ Upon execution of this letter of intent, tt,c buyer viii dQlivQr a check made oayable to Park Pointe Realty. Inc., Trust Account 1n the aladunt of g7,5O~.OO to evidence the good Esith And intention of the buyer to close the ttansactiarl. The Escrow Qeposlt will onl}• bye deF+osite~ upon acceptance cf this agreement by tht sells-. Der- e:~ta-i~ cE tlse r~l~+' period, buyer will deliver an additional ct-eck :tide payable tc Park Points R9alty, Tnc., Tsrvst AC~unt in the a~ltt C! ;i2,soo.oo for a total deposit of ~ao,voo.oa. T»e szo,oc~c.~ deposit will be released to the Vaugh Estate L*pon real Ies all oont£hgenoies. 7. Closing. . Closing of the QllrchslSp shall occur •t the efEicee of Fit.-et American Title on or l~fore Hatch 3i. 199 or at such other ti.>ee aB the paYties'bhall tsotual3j agree. All Hertel closing . cueta shall be shared by the patties on a 5u/so Danis except Che cost of Owne~r'8 • Title Int~urance IahiCh s hall bs the respoltisibility of the seller. Fach party shall be rassponsible ~oz their awn expenng of legal end/or tax council. Zaxts, irzigetion assessments, etc., shall be prorated betwRen the .'patties at clasinq. The brvkerago aatnpanies involves in this tranadctio~ are Volgt-Davfs Realtors and Part. Pointe Re31ty, Irlc., both 208 529 89b5 05-06-93 11:43AM f003 1128 +. . ~ :~..... ........ ... ... P. 4i6 May 5~ 19h3 1~Cr . A i 11 vaugh Yage Three cepresentfnq tho buyex. A bknkerage Eae uf11. ba paid by"the saller et C106it1~ of e~efe:roW in the amount of TEN PERCENT (lo!) o! the final galas price. 9 . Ot ex_~i~Y t~ ion This egre~~nent is being signed by Gary Voigt first a~nrt eaust be apcept+d by *hR Ysugh Estate an or bnfors E:vo p•M. MnT, Nay 12, 1993. It not acvepted by May 12, 1903, buyer has the = option to declare this agceemeT~t null an~3 void. The parties hereby agree to the terns and conditions o[ this offer by executihq Chia 1Qtter ss indicated below. Sincerely, R. Craig Groves ]~sgociate @roker Accepted by: Gary Voigt 8y: Oats Vauqh Eetnte Hy: Dated: ~ • • .. RCG : bl l ~ , .~ i R-96X 208 529 8965 05-06-83 11:~3AM POOL l~21 ,, PIRY 06 '9~ 11=41 FATCO I.F. p,g~, • . !S1I$IeI'1' ~r~" i. !- llound:s<ry survey ahioh can be usAd t4 Corinulate a devolop>~-ant plan. Z. Copy of rtnl estate tax bilia for 1992. ~. current com~aftment for titlr Insurance from first ~-n-erican Title toget.!-er with copies of all d~cun+cnts referred to therein and all doova+ents giving rise to exceptions; to title. 4. A 1ev61 oils eriVirvnmental assessment. 5. Copy of ilnci9ation assessment notices. 6. Copy oZ ariy lases less attans~encs. 7. Copl• cf a cnzZent appraisal which laay or •ay not be Eor the pur~hasa price. - - j - ~~ I R-96>K 208 529 9985 05-06-93 1 I : ~ 3AIA P005 l12B ~' C.'i ~I+ ti ~ 'yam ,, K ~ r. - ~` r ,, ~.`' z t ~ '~ ~ ~+ i a ~ r ~ `Y's ~ ~ ~ a '° ~ /,~•r a . i~~~, ,. COPY Richetd F. Goodson Hawley Troxell Ennis i Hawley ~ ~---~tp- P.Q. BOx 161! - ,~ it ~~ Boise. Idaho 8301 SEP ? M7G Tclcphone~ (208) 3f:-7683 - ' Attorneys for Petition.>.r ~, 9H,rucr oo«tK n.oau IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF T}iE FOUPT}{ ;,LUICIAL D151R:C: OF Ti:E STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FGR THE C:OI+::YY OF ADA Iy i}IE MATTER OF THE ESTATE ) Case NO. 3P •4524 ) OF ) DECREE VESTItiG ESTATE IN SURVIVINr H`JSBAND MARIE R. ARTS. ' . - _ - -. _ ~ Deceased. ~ , A.' -- . ), •Tne Petition of Raymond V- Arte for r Decree vrsting an estate is him as a surviving husband having came before the Court fir hearing. and the Court having heard t2ta evidence and Deinq fuilf advised in th° Premises, the Court makes ~.he following Findings: . ;i.+y of April. 1976. at Afar c R. Artc dice: :~ . :i•~..th, s++id decedent ~:aa Boise, Idaho. At the i i~,,u '~' domiciled in T+da Co~nt~ • 1"'""' :I. The decedent f~ied in testate. III. The decedent is survived by the following heirs: *telatiy iF Address Name Husband 1h10 tl. Locust Grt~'•'^ ~"''~'• R.;ymond V• Arta Mcri.li.~n, Id:+1'o BJi•4: Daughter 3610 N. lticunt Gtcw,' ~:".`~~ Carmen J. Arte Meridian, Id~+l-o 83~~42 1-I)fiCR}:F V};;,TING ESTATE. IN SURVIVING ItUSRAND Y '~ -•-, 1 _ i? 1 ~ i. y E~ N ~~ ~: n f•:lrharl J. Attc Son ±1 ~. i. t t a' . - i ° t ' i ~. ~g-Y ~ i ~~ ~Y .~'. •'~ .: 2 j t. f 3G 10 ::. i,or~;.t GC~Vr }tread D:crid•.art. Idtiho 83L42 361u N. Locust Gruv~ RO~d ~?•:ridian, Td~ho 83642 `•• 1 •Vt SL 1,,^~l'rr ltay;,r.i;Ci ;~•: ~ ...... ..ar is F., .. ta= a• a t '~ .r it . 1955. at .: c. `..~ ..s.. ~ °• ~ -,•~ •i ,t da~c tin='1 • i..•c • lt:. ... .a .E. ~.tl~tt ~ c:.rcrdant l,•2 t r~~j..e:'ty. ::t.' ~ cor.~ unity 1• cam.;: istin5 sol~'ly °' V. d „rtC • •~T' •s leLitip:.. ~` ouse. Rayr..ord er and her servi~inS s .icn•'-r of the decedent. the Peti' the decedent the surviving £1'O1'Se declaring area `'S`a- tl;at as a Court is entitle3 to the Drcree of th bc",c'e full). unity proFerty of said comsn the sole blisr.ing tl-at all titionez as ~~,~t~d on April 11. 1976, in the Pe •• l ~ l a. as r~._;uirrd j'y t ~.t'..-1 ~ ..... ~ _ . . rt .tl ,.t.i: . - t .,~ ir.. .~: . ~. .... ... ~~ I •1,tl.l.,]] riy`• `• t'•_• ` ~ `d~j.is oz•i: true: ~_ i,rt~. ,-,1! tltc said t;aric ec-t to un~lcr `r ~.reditor and :;!t- ~lctnan.l as a Prop rxccl;t .l.Vti. r. al .~r~; { r •:t.t1 : t 1L`•t n: t.ilt.~«~• butc•d i,; more harticula;ly duscr ~~• ~{il:•NitPin ~1.~.~;~V, `:1.:,'1'l;l~; V.::.'i:l'I: {;i :'.tii:\':v1: k~d"F ~+; '~YLl.HY ... • ~.'r~ ~.t'~t}. F-.'. - ~• tip'' I • r REAL PROi'EItTY . t ;hr' south half of the south half otf the northw,at ~varter of the southwest quarter of Section 32, ':~wnst~ip 9 North, Range 3 East, IIoise Pleridian, togetT.er with all at,d sinyuiar the tenements, ht•red i tar~c:nts .md appurtenances thereunto belong- in:~ u_ in anywi::c appertaining, tha reversion and reversions, rcm:inder and remainders, rents, } issues anti profits thereof. ~ PERSONAL PROT'ERTY 1. ]973 To;ut.t Pickup, t.D. QRt+-22,016,G70 ~. ::.,vin~~~: i. 1.:7.C. (Idaho tlatianal Guards Pcdcrei Crc•~lit Union, Auc~unt 44?b0-2 2 Fist Federal Savincrs and Loan Asso- . ciatiot,, Orchard branch, Boise. Idaho, I+ccount 4 4095 3. Hone Federal Savings and :,oan Associa- tion Westgate IIranch, F3oise, Idaho. Account i2000G52 b. ChecY.ing: Id.. , First t:tti ic.nal itan'r., T•:~'ridian, Idaho l+cc:u,:nt i 1241 0255 05 085209 i S' '• ' A 3. T•:i:u•rllnr.cnus , ~r~onal ~:u ~. zt. ( a I'i Ili I'lti:"I'}If;F: (~Yi)}:ILI:U, ATtJ::ir.:}:a 1, ::` itl;~iiFEU, that, any , :et_ t ~' .-.rod 1: `.i Ch i 1 ;.t i ~l - t t r{ ' ttonc•t, ~,r it wht.-t, t', :..~: ~. ~t,u'. .,n•~ ~ l,.tw~ nn int~.•rc::t .,r.l tl:. .. :c1:}i thi., ~ ...,} • ~, - ~. r. ••. r., .~~4tnr.y .q, %• '~, _, . I A ~ . . . $...ry r' .. . , 4 ' ' ' i `~r' . , :(r~ :~ryi~,:~ r w~3! ~' . f t:..:. y - ~ - ,~ t ~ t ~ ~ y{ f: - -'~. -:' ~ n_ M~a; ~~- c'1 t : t. E, ' y~ ! -1 } ~ Y' r R 'i ~ _ +.k ~ ~ ` ' `.i~ _ ~ `~ ~a,r..a~;"'~.~,.. ~~ ,Y*' ~.~. 81.x.... .,~m,..~_ ' ._._ ~ t..2! -- -- ~ .~.. ~ ^~. r_~., c:; .yr~q ' ~4n r, _ - ~; ~'. _ .: ~'!ti ..-. :: ~ ~,' us. a... ~~ - ,.#ha foIIpTy ss. 'a T..4 ' • : ., : drove Rodd-~`„ ~ -~.` .- ..~-Tp. ~,'tlg ~ AHD z.TO=BOLD;-tl~+ _ _, ~ •,iinto-tt>3. 'sold -tiraatis;Lib Qhelr~,et do -hereby oovena~t =te ~.at1 ~: t2>zt 's ^- feei.simpiejof~saisi Pie T.. -. - -° t gauss: ~sseas~ a j~ ~~a~ ~' 4 ~ ~ ti a s `r `" ~ _ ~ , r9 M ~ N 1 t. ~ ~ 1 1 {,. ~ , ~ ~ S Y r ,' ' ~ ~ °' '- ,. _'wq . Y' _. ~ €~ -a Y 4 e z ~- ~._, .. F !1 ~~ _ ~d ~~'. t~' ~" z t ~ ~ •_,. .; ~-4,M.t~iiW =^ ~jL ;~~_ t•~ '~~ •~~vP~'~~y.~., ~~T:~ .~-.fw . ..~ r- ~ • -, = iTATE OF .tAL1F0BNiA ): ss. - ~ --i. ~ ~_ - •f >- • L;, ~~ ~ ~.-- ,may cf~"~~ ipn~, bslors mss tM attdaroi ode _ -°- ''~ ' tie this »onaity oiypsit"oa ROBSRT L. .e ~. f~ said Stag. po r~oas .~t>s>. b "•= s -_ a tiotaly ;pab$o ~~ /asntified to mr to ba tho Dorm _ - ~ . , •~ s~~a ~Dtvithiet in~tntnwnt and acknorvladQsd to alo.tbst hs sxseuted . ' ' ~ file same. - TN MITNE88 NHEREOF~ i have herstt troflrot s asDr-rl coe~tred ,.. pry offla4al ssai the day and year !tt thta oe • ota o or o ~n~n~u~ununuamunanuuw My ppyaiastOII acylrssl G~N jfL 0-fIC1AL f[At. GEORDIA OASSWINT . mi ooul~irolt+~~"~ .L ~ y,uan~u ~ Jw+If, nos ~nnnnun~unu~uu~ttm~uu~ _ ~ _. ~. < MARBl1N?Y DP.[D ~ 1 _, _ ~ ~ r ~ ~~ p•.~ a . '~ ~~ . f + ~~ z .$f,- ~.~ ~~rf,: w ~ 3,^h..-~ ~ ..7, "y ~'K"r 5 r_ - r ~ sJ ~.f .n.a bb~~ 3 r `; ~ y ~ '~ S r ~ C ~ ~ ~ - ~r _~ ~ zf ` -.- ~ v= .= t c :~a Nf-:.... ~i]]~ r, c5T I~i~~.i. ...cats ,T .~h ~T7'~4~ ~... ^57~; 1. 5 -r~r.~.~. 'iC ~l ~ ~. ~,7yE. L.. .y..:~ ~~ r jl ~ i . -.:i - a` r ~,, ~~ . 3,y...,i -~ ~~° ~- ~~ ^{ ~' ~ ,- ,.~ Tit-_ ~' ^~ :~~ -~ ~~ _ .,,, ,~ 7 >~ i -r ~* 1 r a _ .z .' ~xr 2 i ~ Y ,:3 "'L7` .~~ .: r 1 ~d ~ ~ ~ i ,~~~_ 1-., '. ' t ~~`~~~ - L_ '~ ~PY Z 1 !~ ~i ~ I ~ ~ ~ -I T ~ t ~ y,~ ~ . ~ j.,~,~`~~w Y 1 i _ ~t t 1 [ ~ -5 1 } r ~ 7,~ 3 t s, a .~""`~'.''~ - _: ~ ~ arm.- ~, ~ r'° r, - ;~ ''F°' ~/r ~~~ c~,~C~ ' ~Y ~y k., ~ ~ ~:..- tit.' Y"x' •`. ,,K ~' 4 i ~ ~. v l . q~~ - s -~ s:r ~~ ~i ~' y,- a ~y ,~ i ~. 1 ~ v t. ?~R 7 ~~'~t y' t,f ~y. rrlt LY ~r~~~.1~y~r~_A .,JY`~+6."bfF W' d ` }~ Y _ ~ i 1.h ._,y, ~ r~~ ~ j~ y _. 2~ry~ F_ ~h zu " a ~,,. ;. ~'P w rt~'t ~f'~ ~ ~ ~e ~ r- ;. ~. 61 .~ _: ~'.rG~~ H,L ~. ~ .Y. m,,:'. ~ ? _. A :-. '~1~ TMif - '"~ ,.a ~SJ~~Y ' t , ~' STATE OF CALIFORNIA; ss. ~;ounty ~f :~~~ I i' / `~l*!"'~ 1U96, bcforo mo, the underrlgned, On this ~v deY' of ' rearad AARAARA ANN a Nntery Public in error s:+id Stets, pcrsunelly ePl TAYLbR, Y.nown or identilie+l to me to be the pcrsun ahoslc Hama is subscribed to the wlthh. instrumuut and acknue;ledged to tnc that shr executed the su..e• iN WITNESS Wf~F.RI:OF, I Have herew+tu set my hour rittrnxifi~trd + t seal the d:+y and year to ttls certlil~tc fl 't o . ~ ~ t. -4G o ry Public or Cali or.'-le ~ _ 1 [ding st: 1~ t y Fkk~t /'.c4~ r t.~ I+ly commisslnn expires: Ji~l $t IS `II Y p~Ftcwl sui rM D~CEIJSO JwY e. 1P94 1; r u Y ~~ G ,~ b ~~ tiv,vtltnr.rv liiaa~ - x ;~ ._~ . fc ~• ~. ( r i Q ~~:~~ '3] !i~:~ 23 ~Yi 2 lG ~- ~ ~~-~7-i-' . `~ ~~' NUBBLE ENGINEERING, ING. ~ J ~9~. _Qy 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 208/322-8992 ^ Fax 208/378-0329 Project No. 93050 DESCRIPTION FOR SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION NO. 1 A PORTION OF SW1/4, SECTION 32, T.4N., R.1 E., B.M., BOISE, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO August 19, 1993 A parcel of land lying in the SW1/4 of Section 32, T.4N., R.1 E., B.M., Boise, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the brass cap marking the one-quarter corner common to Section 31 and the said Section 32; thence South 0°00'08" East 2,659.00 feet along the Westerly boundary of the said SW1/4 of Section 32, which is also the centerline of North Locust Grove Road, to a brass cap marking the section corner common to the said Sections 31 and 32 and Sections 6 and 5, T.3N., R.1 E., B.M.; thence North 89°43'17" East 1,325.40 feet along the Southerly boundary of the said SW1/4 of Section 32, which is also the centerline of West Ustick Road, to a point; thence North 0°16'43" West 45.00 feet to a 2-inch pipe, also said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING (INITIAL POINT); thence along the following courses and distances to iron pins: continuing North 0°16'43" West 284.50 feet; thence North 53°23'50" West 80.00 feet; thence North 5°37'20" West 177.56 feet; thence South 84°22'40" West 49.00 feet; thence North 5°37'20" West 105.00 feet; thence South 84°22'40" West 162.43 feet; thence South 78°36'56" West 224.68 feet; Summerfield Subd. No. 1 Page 1 of 2 • • Project No. 93050 August 19, 1993 thence North 68°30'00" West 76.00 feet; thence North 5°10'00" East 60.00 feet; thence North 38°41'00" West 43.00 feet; thence North 47°22'35" West 135.59 feet to a point of beginning of curve; thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left 100.80 feet, said curve having a central angle of 35°00'OT', a radius of 165.00 feet and a long chord of 99.24 feet bearing North 19°57'58" East to a point of tangent; thence North 2°27'55" East 9.96 feet; thence North 87°32'05" West 50.00 feet; thence South 89°59'52" West 568.64 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of the said North Locust Grove Road; thence South 0°00'08" East 893.01 feet along the said Easterly right-of-w,~.y line of North Locust Grove Road to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of the said West Ustick Road; thence North 89°43'17" East 1,300.28 feet along the said Northerly right-of-way line of West Ustick Road to a point; thence North 0°16'43" West 20.00 feet to the point of beginning, comprising 21.69 acres, more or less. JCM/DTP/G LR/dkg/641.des D. Terry Peugh, L.S. Summerfie-d Subd. No. 1 Page 2 of 2 Prepared by: NUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. • • ~ ,, _ ~ w. wousr owov~ wb . nd.r....r _ _ _ ~ J, ~ ~ ~. o~ ~ 4 vo I I ~ ® ~~ I O ~ / ' V • ' ~ ,' ' l I I a. ~ ~/' S • r r . ~ • ~ © y ~ Q O ~ ~ O 1 ~ : c^ S ~~~ ~~ I I -~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 8. I ~ - O g ~~ ~ ~ I ~- ~ © g. d N I A ^ m6~ + . f~ ~ N ~n~ s V ~ I ~ e t`' ~ ~ ~' ~ooo •• t "' ~ cn ~ f I ~ t ~ rn ~' A C~ f i R u 4 . awr . 1 s© ~ ~ i C m- ~J z 6 ~ ~ ~~ I L Q Ai + , A~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ z ~ Z C, 1?~ 1 QQ ~ .N ~ O: ~1 ~~ ~ ~ REK Pp~T OP ecoe++~+o Menu, ~~ t ~ I ~ i I I ~+~+ uNai-thp i ~ ~g M ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~QQ~" li iv ~ : ~ ~ ~a~ ~ . I ,~ ~~ r ~,. ^Y. ~~ i r Q H N LOCi15i GROVE RUAA K ~g ~. gI ~ w o' ~ ~ . S u.m ~~- ~~-~ -e I ~ ~u b~ ~ v ~.~ ~ c ~ IJo, i 1 _ .~ o- ~~ _ ~ _,~ e;~ ~._.___ _ - - _ L?S7 ` _~_ 6 s i ti it !~ ~ _ ~ / ~ ~. s • SLQ/GM i i i .. ~ i SNBLI:[AiL `s I '• > .. w CA O a n ~. ~• 2 r Su Om ~ ~/~' ra ` y ~` ` ~~ !) _ ~ NO 2 +c V M Q ~t ~D ~ gg ~ j 2 M M 4 `~ s ! • I ~V~ -rN~ • ~ \Q ~i t RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 208/322-8992 ^ Fax 208/378-0329 September 9, 1993 Mr. Wayne Forrey Director of .Planning City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Summerfield .Subdivision No. 1 Dear Wayne, The attached Summerfield Subdivision No. 1 final plat is in accordance with the conditions of approval of the preliminary plat and the provisions of the City of Meridian Subdivision Ordinance. Please have the final plat certified for recording. Thank you for your time. Please call if your have any questions. Sincerely, Tracey L. Persons tlp~nlplat.ltr l J i i ~ i I ~ ~ t i I - I ~ i ~ ~ ~--- _ - _ =_ = _---- ~ ~I Q) CJ~ ~. W N ~ N W' I o N ~,,, ~ ~ `~ j ~ ~, , ~ W ~ i ~ ~ ~ N 0 0 C~ I I ~ N °' I ~ N ', ~ ~ C37 J ( I I N , U I ~ ~ N ~ ------------J • Meridian City Council July 18, 1995 Page 40 MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: I would entertain a motion on the conditional use. Tolsma: A decision by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council hereby recommends to the Meridian City Council that they approve the conditional use permit requested by the applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve of the decision, all those in .favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #13: REQUEST FOR ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF THE APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CHAMBERLAIN ESTATES NO.2 BY KEVIN HOWELL: Morrow. I have a question Mr. Mayor, what is the difference between this request. and the one. Kingsford: Time hadn't elapsed. Morrow. Mr. Mayor , I would move that we grant the one year extension of the preliminary plat for Chamberlain Estates No. 2 by Kevin Howell Construction. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to grant the one year extension for the preliminary plat for Chamberlain Estates No. 2 by Kevin Howell, all those in favor? Opposed? Motion carried: All Yea ITEM #14: NON-DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION NO. 2: Kingsford: Shari would you, do you have any comments on that. Have you seen it, or Gary, who is the appropriate? Meridian City Council July 18, 1995 Page 41 Smith: Mr. Mayor this is similar to the non-development agreement that you previously approved for Bedford Place. Kingsford: So we are talking about anon-development agreement, I see from Will`s notes that Wayne has marked that up substantially, Wayne do you have a comment for the Council? Crookston: Again your honor I haven't reviewed it since I did those comments. I don't know whether or not those changes have been made. Smith: They have Mr. Mayor, I sent a faxed copy of Wayne's comments to Hubble Engineering and Tracy Persons over there made those changes and sent the revised back to me. They did incorporate, I checked it against Wayne's comments and they did incorporate the comments. Kingsford: So, Counselor, what is appropriate here? We have to approve the non- development agreement and authorize do I have to sign that? Crookston: Yes you do, you and Will have to sign it. Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I would move that we enter into anon-development agreement for Summefield Subdivision No. 2 and authorize the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest that agreement with Summertield Subdivision and Gary Voigt the developer. Yerrington: Second Ingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to enter into anon-development agreement for SummerFeld Subdivision No. 2, Gary Voigt, authorize the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #15: COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR BEDFORD PLACE: Kingsford: Counselor have you reviewed those and do they meet with your approval? Crookston: I reviewed them and I think they have made all of their respective changes that I asked for. Kingsford: Will is saying that they have, is there a motion on those CC&R's? • i MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: JULY 18 1995 APPLICANT ITEM NUMBER; 14 REQUEST; NON-DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR SUMMERFIELD SU~DMSION NO 2 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: ~~,~ CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: AI! Materials presented at public m~tings shall become property of the City of Meridian. STREET LIGHT AGREEMENT ~ 950~~Zii7 a .. , _..;l~LE i. .- ~ . r~ w. ~i ;i ~t~lt-.1~~U $OiS£ (~ This Street Light Agreement is made and entered into between the CITY OF MERIDIAN and G.L Voigt, pertaining to the street lights in Summerfi~e~ ~~~c~~isiai~ ~. 1, a residential development in Meridian, Idaho. ~ OFF ~~- ~~ ~ ` - For good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follow. 1. G.L Voigt has provided two (2) street lights poles, concrete pole bases, fixtures, bulbs, and ballasts to the residential development known as Summerfield Subdivision No. 1, Meridian Idaho. The parties acknowledge that the two (2) street light poles and factures were specially ordered items, not customarily used in residential developments. 2. G.L Voigt, or his assigns, agna3 to replace, repair and provide any required maintenance of any of the above mentioned street lights, globes, ballasts, and/or components thereof, that may hereafter be broken, damaged, or deteriorated, or require maintenance, at its own expense; and it is further agreed that G.L Voigt, or its heirs, successors and assigns, shall keep the lights operational at all times, it being understood by the City that globes, and/or ballasts, do bum out and that the City will allow a reasonable time to replace them. 3. It is agreed that the City of Meridian authorize and pay for the electrical service to be supplied to the two (2) street lights located in Summerf~eld Subdivision No.1 in the usual and customary manner. 4. It is agreed that the City of Meridian, because Idaho Power Company will not maintain the globes and ballasts or provide any maintenance, will enter into a Schedule 40 Agreement with Idaho Power Company, and not a Schedule 41 Agreement, which in proper cases provide that Idaho Power would provide maintenance, globes, and ballasts. It is also agreed that lighting served under the Schedule 40 Agreement must be controlled by a photo electric device of the "fail safe° type. 5. It is understood and agreed that G.L Voigt will assign its rights and obligations hereunder to Summerfield Subdivision Homeowners Associationwhen said Homeowners Association is formed and operational. SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION NO. 1 STREET LIGHT AGREEMENT Page 1 • • 6. This AGREEMENT shall be binding on G.L. Voigt, its heirs, successors and assigns, and the City of Meridian. DATED This _~ day of ~iz emu. d~~ 19 ~S ~,~~111tlfttfllr~~~' ,,~~`~ ~ 4F ~-,p'''%, r~~~s y~ d^~ ,,,,,,,~ ~ovi~ ~o~,`~,,,. ATTEST: '''~~„~,~f-~~t~~t~~,~~~`~~ CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipality and political subdivision of the State of Idaho B ~ Grant P. Kingsford, Mayor City Clerk, William G. er , Jr. ATTEST: r~~~~.; BY G.L. oigt SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION NO. 1 STREET LIGHT AGREEMENT Page 2 • '• STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss. Count of Ada ) On this ~k day of flu usf , 19 9 ~ ,before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, rsonally appeared Grant P. ICngsford and William g. Berg, Jr. of the CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipality and political subdivision of the State of Idaho, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of Meridian, Idaho, who subscribed their names to the within and foregoing instruments in their capacity as Mayor and City Clerk, and acmowledged to me that they executed the same in the name of the CITY OF MERIDIAN. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. `~drneae~~~~~ 4 ~ ~ ~• f ~ ` r V~ p J ~ (SEAL) ~ ,~,~ y .a „' ~~ ,~ ~~~ ~ . eeee~~'' ~, ;' ~' ,~,,e STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss. County of~~~1~dIX-cam PUBLIC FOR IDAHO at Meridian, Idaho ion Expires: 8'/ ~ / 9~/ On this o?.S'~ day of ~~"~~ , 19~-~, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and fo~said mate, personally appeared ~'A R, y .~. vo /~7known to me to be the "-' of '~ who subscribed this name to the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of said Corporation as President and Secretary. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. ,: ~tpNn uN~l„~~~~, . i~ :.•• iv. ; . y ~~ r ~~. '" ~. ~, ~.~ .. ,' . ~ ~~GG-l~-~ L%- NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO Residing at~gt, Idaho / ~ ~+ ~ ~ «S Commission Expires: /// /~19~! SUMMERFIELD SUBDMSION NO. 1 STREET LIGHT AGRELNT Page 3 ~-~6 -~~ ------- --1__ ~' _____ - d--- ~ ~ ___ __ ~ __ ___ _ _. as .~ Meridian City Council January 17, 1995 Page Z MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #3: TABLED JANUARY 3, 1995: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR WATERBURY PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 5: The motion was made and seconded to table the Development Agreement for Waterbury Park Subdivision No. 5 at the applicant's request until the February 7, 1995 meeting. MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #4: TABLED JANUARY 3, 1995: VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THE LANDING NO. 7 SUBDIVISION BY SKYLINE DEVELOPMENT: The motion was made and seconded to table the variance request for The Landing No. 7 Subdivision at the applicant's request until the February 7, 1995 meeting. MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #5: TABLED JANUARY 3, 1995: DEVELOPMENT .AGREEMENT FOR SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION NO. 1 AND 2: The motion was made and seconded to approve the Development Agreement and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign it. MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #!~: TABLED JANUARY 3, 1995: AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST FOR GROVE RUN SUBDIVISION BY JLG BUILDERS: Councilman Morrow steps down due to a conflict of interest. The motion was made and seconded to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. ROLL CALL VOTE: Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea The motion was made and seconded to approve the decision as written. MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ~ ~ • • Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 2 ITEM #3: TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: WATERBURY PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 5: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR Kingsford: Council has received a letter asking fora 2 week delay, I would entertain a motion to table those for 2 weeks. Morrow: So moved Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to table items 2 and 3 to the next Council meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #4: TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR THE LANDING SUBDIVISION NO.7 BY SKYLINE DEVELOPMENT: Kingsford: Likewise request for table by the developer. They were unable to get their meeting put together with Nampa Meridian and so forth as we had discussed at the last meeting. 1 would entertain a motion to table that. Morrow: So moved Tolsma: Second Ingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to table item 4, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #5: TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION NO. 1 AND 2: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR Kingsford: Shari, what is the status with that? Stiles: On Number 1 and 2 that has been reviewed by myself and Wayne Crookston and approved but not signed by the developer at this point. The following item has been returned signed by the developer. Morrow: Those are 2 different developers are they not? ~ S • Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 3 Stiles: Right Morrow: I would move to table Summerfield Subdivision No. 1 and 2, the development agreement until signed by the developer. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max, to table SummerField Subdivision No. 1 and 2 development agreement until the next meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #6: TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION NO. 3: Kingsford: As Shari has indicated that has been signed and returned. Any questions about that? Morrow: My only question is that everything is in the proper order Shari? Stiles: Yes, I believe there are no problems at all with the development agreement. Morrow: And Wayne? Crookston: As far as I know, from my review of it. Kingsford: Well if you wouldn't know Counselor, pray tell me who would? Crookston: Can I have five minutes? It is ready. Kingsford: I would entertain a motion to approve. Morrow: So moved Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of the Summerfield Subdivision No. 3 development, Max Boesiger, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea APl2 1 ' 9~. 16:56 47~F~Oir'i~'s ~••ttt-l•l reuJt•i l-tl'1.7~.-11-;~za- ~ra~cv rte. ~-. ems, ~c, ~o~ • PA6E.~01 .v ew.rrr ati r •rr ~~~M~L~ ~`~A~~A~'1"T~1Lr. ~~~ t! RAC i ~t:' `ra•~ OT f~ ¢3~ F'est~t" Flax tag .679 1b s ?. Co. ~ ~ ~x ~ ~ ! - Nu~rr t'rf tt!~ .~. ~ .__(let~ ~ t~m~. !i y~pu d~ Etbl{ eve the n~gn4i41' Gd p iced emirs. t t~N ~e r +~ Via ~ ~ t~l111 tl~ teig Fi4it M > ~~ ,~,...., +K+eEt ~~ TOTAL PA~~- i~C~~ m~ • + • • Meridian City Council October 5, 1993 Page 3 Kingsford: Anything else Council? If not is there a motion on the Final Plat? Giesler: Mr. Mayor the question, regarding the gentleman's comments, if I heard x~im right, that we .decide on a different location that they would agree to contribute a Certain amount of funds or I'm wondering if we need this in the motion? Kingsford: We would just call them. as willing to negotiate,I would suggest then that in a motion if that's the Council's pleasure that there be made a provision maybe authorize either Mr. Forrey or Myself or one of the Council to be on the negotiation. Giesler: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the Final Plat for Merit Homes Inc. Kentfield Manor subdivision, with stipulation that meets staff approval and .also have the City Planner and the Mayor to negotiate the possible Fire station site or necessary details on that issue. That's it. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Bob Giesler and second by Max Yerrington to approve of the Kentfield subdivision by Merit Homes Inc. condition upon staff approval and the City Planner and Mayor negotiating a satisfactory resolution to the Fire station issue and or fees. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea: ITEM #2: FINAL PLAT FOR SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION BY G.L. VOIGHT Kingsford: Does council have question for either staff or their engineers? Tolsma: I had a question, probably the same issues. The whole school site that was negotiated out here when , this letter we got here from the School District says their no. longer interested in that particular area. • • Meridian City Council October 5, 1993 Page 4 Kingsford: Would you address that Mr. Forrey since you had conversation this afternoon with the School District. Forrey: Yes, thank you, Mr. Mayor,Members of the Council and Councilman Tolsma. In the Conference of plan the School District identified generally where school sites were needed. In this section in the center generally is a school symbol. It is not necessarily site specific, it's floating,. meaning in that section there, a school is needed. At the preliminary plat approval stage of this particular project I believe Don Hubble indicated that the developer would work with the School District to identify an acceptable site. And work through the .this issue, and they have been doing that. And in fact they got to the point where I think Mr. Craig Groves - Help me Craig if I am getting this wrong. I'm getting it from Mr. Mabe, and I talked to him about 4:50 this afternoon. To help move that along and comply with the preliminary plat requirements Mr. Groves and Mr. Mabe have identified a farm owned by Mr. Davis that the School District felt was a good location and pretty much in the center of this section. they approached Mr. Davis and he indicated that he had no objections to a school site on his property if he would ever develop it. Mr.Mabe indicated he would like to something in writing, so to bring that to pass Mr. Groves kind of came up with an excellent idea and that is to negotiate a first right of way refusal between Mr. Davis, who owns this farm ground next to Summerfield and the School District. So Mr. Maye feels like the city could go' ahead and approve the Final Plat, but he would like a condition on the approval that that agreement that first right of way refusal agreement be negotiated and signed by the School District and that Mr. Davis, I guess, or the appropriate parties, that then would give them the assurance that there is a school site there so that when development occurs they've got the ability to move in and the school problem. That would remove that stipulation from the preliminary plat would allow the Final Plat to be approved. So that was his specific request tonight that there be a stipulation on the approval of the Final Plat. Kingsford: Mr. Groves wants to speak to that issue so let's maybe clear that up. Craig you want to? Meridian City Council October 5, 1993 Page 5 Groves: Over the last several months we've had many conversations with Mr. Davis and his wife about the possibility of a school site on their property. The conversation we've had with Mr. Davis is that if and when he is ready to sell his property, he certainly would not be opposed to selling his site to the school as long as it wasn't market value. And I have asked him if he would be opposed to putting that in writing and he kind of indicated,"well just have the School District call me and,I'll tell them that over the phone" okay, I've told Mr. Mabe that we would try to get this in writing but you know he didn't express to me that is was a condition. I guess I'm confident that Mr. Davis is a man of his word, will if and when he is ready, he is a dairy farmer right now ha kind of indicated that if he sells it will be 5 to ten years from now. I don't know what the school's needs are for a school site, Mr. Mabe had indicated to me that it would be five to seven years in that area. Now that could be sooner I don't know. Kingsford: First our concerns as are the Schools District's that something like that is a verbal thing is not binding certainly on Mr. Davis' heirs of successors and we want very much to aid the School District in ensuring that there is a site there. In my recommendation to council that we stipulate in the approval that we either get one a first right of refusal at market value from Davis or from this development. Or, an appropriate fee, you know to set aside on somewhere, and that could be in the negotiation. Groves: Well, I mean that is really coming from the Council, and it's not coming from the School. District. Kingsford: The School District in our discussion with Mr. Mabe this afternoon,that was what he said and certainly what the letter form Mr. Mabe said is not concurrent with what we meant with School Board members a week ago last night.. They asked us to give some help to them in locating sites conditioned approvals on that, so that's like a, Mr. Yerrington and Mr. Giesler and myself met with them and that was thrusted their conversation in. Groves: Like I said we will diligently work on the issue I would hope that it wouldn't be a condition of the approval, but. • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chlei W.L. "BILL" CORDON, Police Chiet WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman • Planning & Zoning 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor R ~L~ T0: Will Berg, City Clerk FROM: Shari Stiles, P&Z Administ ator DATE: March 31, 1994 SUBJECT: Summerfield Subdivision No. 1 -sO~~~~g `~r~~ ~ `~ ~~~~ Will, would you please sign the final plat for Summerfield Subdivision No. 1? The developer has agreed that no building permits will be issued until a development agreement is approved by the City. I am still working on the development agreement and hope to complete it with Wayne Crookston in the next two weeks. John Priester at Ada County is taking anywhere from four to six weeks to sign off on final plats, so they would like to get it submitted as soon as possible. Please let me know if you have a problem with this. Thank you. . ~ ~~ ® ~ •~ _ _ -_ u ~ 0 - i it ~ ~ ~ I o . • . ~ e~ ~ i~ ~ d ~ ~~~ .~ iR~ ~~ t~ ~- ~ ~ 9 i . o i~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~I~+ . ~' ` to~ ~~•~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ n Z ,~ ~ c z ~ ~i ~, , I a ~ . inns • 1 s O z j O ~• i I i l l I .. •• ~ nul v~or.T oo aca~.~wo n.~ ~ r ~ {~iL-11m ~ RR ~~ ~ 11. Olb'4S' M[ 140 ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ s~ ~~ 1~ '1 ~ ~" ~.' ~. ~~ = q ~~ H N lOQJ57 OItOrE RiJAG R ' ~~ . • Meridian City Council October 5, 1993 Page 3 Kingsford: Anything else Council? If not is there a motion on the Final Plat? Giesler: Mr. Mayor the question, regarding the gentleman's comments, if I heard him right, that we decide on a different location that they would agree to contribute a certain amount of funds or I'm wondering if we need this in the motion? Kingsford: We would just call them as willing to negotiate,I would suggest then that in a motion if that's the Council's pleasure that there be made a provision maybe authorize either Mr. Forrey or Myself or one of the Council to be on the negotiation. Giesler: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the Final Plat for Merit Homes Inc. Kentfield Manor subdivision, with stipulation that meets staff approval and also have the City Planner and the Mayor to negotiate the possible Fire station site or necessary details on that issue. That's it. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Bob Giesler and second by Max Yerrington to approve of the Kentfield subdivision by Merit Homes Inc. condition upon staff approval and the City Planner and Mayor negotiating a satisfactory resolution to the Fire station issue and or fees. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea: ITEM #2: FINAL PLAT FOR SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION BY G.L. VOIGHT Kingsford: Does council have question for either staff or their engineers? Tolsma: I had a question, probably the same issues. The whole school site that was negotiated out here when , this letter we got here from the School District says their no longer interested in that particular area. • Meridian City Council October 5, 1993 Page 4 Kingsford: Would you address that Mr. Forrey since you had conversation this afternoon with the School District. Forrey: Yes, thank you, Mr. Mayor,Members of the Council and Councilman Tolsma. In the Conference of plan the School District identified generally where school sites were needed. In this section in the center generally is a school symbol. It is not necessarily site specific, it's floating, meaning in that section there, a school is needed. At the preliminary plat approval stage of this particular project I believe Don Hubble indicated that the developer would work with the School District to identify an acceptable site. And work through the this issue, and they have been doing that. And in fact they got to the point where I think Mr. Craig Groves - Help me Craig if I am getting this wrong. I'm getting it from Mr. Mabe, and I talked to him about 4:50 this afternoon. To help move that along and comply with the preliminary plat requirements Mr. Groves and Mr. Mabe have identified a farm owned by Mr. Davis that the School District felt was a good location and pretty much in the center of this section. they approached Mr. Davis and he indicated that he had no objections to a school site on his property if he would ever develop it. Mr.Mabe indicated he would like to something in writing, so to bring that to pass Mr. Groves kind of came up with an excellent idea and that is to negotiate a first right of way refusal between Mr. Davis, who owns this farm ground next to Summerfield and the School District. So Mr. Maye feels like the city could go ahead and approve the Final Plat, but he would like a condition on the approval that that agreement that first right of way refusal agreement be negotiated and signed by the School District and that Mr. Davis, I guess, or the appropriate parties, that then would give them the assurance that there is a school site there so that when development occurs they've got the ability to move in and the school problem. That would remove that stipulation from the preliminary plat would allow the Final Plat to be approved. So that was his specific request tonight that there be a stipulation on the approval of the Final Plat. Kingsford: Mr. Groves wants to speak to that issue so let's maybe clear that up. Craig you want to? • Meridian City Council October 5, 1993 Page 5 Groves: Over the last several months we've had many conversations with Mr. Davis and his wife about the possibility of a school site on their property. The conversation we've had with Mr. Davis is that if and when he is ready to sell his property, he certainly would not be opposed to selling his site to the school as long as it wasn't market value. And I have asked him if he would be opposed to putting that in writing and he kind of indicated,"well just have the School District call me and I'll tell them that over the phone" okay, I've told Mr. Mabe that we would try to get this in writing but you know he didn't express to me that is was a condition. I guess I'm confident that Mr. Davis is a man of his word, will if and when he is ready, he is a dairy farmer right now ha kind of indicated that if he sells it will be 5 to ten years from now. I don't know what the school's needs are for a school site, Mr. Mabe had indicated to me that it would be five to seven years in that area. Now that could be sooner I don't know. Kingsford: First our concerns as are the Schools District's that something like that is a verbal thing is not binding certainly on Mr . Davis' heirs of successors and we want very much to aid the School District in ensuring that there is a site there. In my recommendation to council that we stipulate in the approval that we either get one a first right of refusal at market value from Davis or from this development. Or, an appropriate fee, you know to set aside on somewhere, and that could be in the negotiation. Groves: Well, I mean that is really coming from the Council, and it's not coming from the School District. Kingsford: The School District in our discussion with Mr. Mabe this afternoon that was what he said and certainly what the letter form Mr. Mabe said is not concurrent with what we meant with School Board members a week ago last night. They asked us to give some help to them in locating sites conditioned approvals on that, so that's like a, Mr. Yerrington and Mr. Giesler and myself met with them and that was thrusted their conversation in. Groves: Like I said we will diligently work on the issue I would hope that it wouldn't be a condition of the approval, but. Meridian City Council October 5, 1993 Page 6 Kingsford: Well, if it isn't we've got no handle. Groves: Yes, I understand that, other than you've got my word that I'll work on it very hard to get it done. Kingsford: I feel good about that, but I'm not sure. Any other questions or comments from the Council? Tolsma: Mr. Mayor, I do have one question with Gary's few comments on the floor about that modeling data computer modeling data. Do we, should we have that also in the minutes as far as approval, that that is indeed done because of the well situation out there. Mercle: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, I'd like to Kingsford: Would you state your name please. Mercle: I'm Jim Mercle with Hubble engineering, I'm a representative for the applicant. Regarding the school site issue I'd like to throw out a possible solution. the school site wouldn't be located in a Phase 1 portion of this 68 acre project, anyway. It would towards the center section, and if Mr. Davis, if we can't get our first right of refusal agreement with him, and if it would be in the Summerfield subdivision it would not be within the first phase it would be within the future phase, so one possible solution would to make a condition on the future phase but to hold up the first phase. Maybe those negotiations can't be done by the time we need the City Engineer to sign the Plat. And I don't feel the client should be held hostage for that issue on the first phase at least. Kingsford: Any other comments from the Council? 71 lots,How many lots were in the entire? Mercle: 198 Kingsford: You can put that restriction on whoever the assessor was. Mr. Mercle the data that we have call out 71 lots. • Meridian City Council October 5, 1993 Page 7 Mercle: I think that's because on the application he included all the common areas and each individual area but there are only 61 fillable lots. Probably l0 common lots or landscape lots. Kingsford: What is the Council's pleasure? I think Mr. Mercle point is well taken we could hold the passage on the next date certainly. Tolsma: Mr. Mayor I would move to approve the Final Plat of the Summerfield subdivision 71 lot, subject to the engineers approval of his comments and that the School District site be included in the overall project but not necessarily n the Final Plat of the first phase. Kingsford: Is there a second? Yerrington: Second. Kingsford: It has been moved by Ron and seconded by Max to approve the Final Plat for Summerfield subdivision 71 lot conditioned upon engineer approval and subject to a stipulation the school site approval in the next phase, either there or negotiated in that section. All those in favor? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #3 - ROD'S PARKSIDE CREEK ~4 106 LOTS BY L & R SALES Kingsford: Any questions or comments from the Council on that? Giesler: Mr. Mayor, I guess I'd like to have Gary explain some of his comments. Gary is any of these things been resolved, or is it sill pretty much, a lot of things to take of? Smith: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Giesler, I received an updated Plat that, yesterday or this morning, from the Project Manager of Hubble engineers, and a letter of apology based on the incomplete lat that was submitted, I'm not up to speed on their operation on the computer edited drafting design system that they use nowadays, but apparently part of that program had been turned off LJ r Meridian City Council October 5, 1993 Page 3 Kingsford: Anything else Council? If not is there a motion on the Final Plat? Giesler: Mr. Mayor the question, regarding the gentleman's comments, if I heard him right, that we decide on a different location that they would agree to contribute a certain amount of funds or I'm wondering if we need this in the motion? Kingsford: We would just call them as willing to negotiate,I would suggest then that in a motion if that's the Council's pleasure that there be made a provision maybe authorize either Mr. Forrey or Myself or one of the Council to be on the negotiation. Giesler: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the Final Plat for Merit Homes Inc. Kentfield Manor subdivision, with stipulation that meets staff approval and also have the City Planner and the Mayor to negotiate the possible Fire station site or necessary details on that issue. That's it. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Bob Giesler and second by Max Yerrington to approve of the Kentfield subdivision by Merit Homes Inc. condition upon staff approval and the City Planner and Mayor negotiating a satisfactory resolution to the Fire station issue and or fees. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea: ITEM #2: FINAL PLAT FOR SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION BY G.L. VOIGHT Kingsford: Does council have question for either staff or their engineers? Tolsma: I had a question, probably the same issues. The whole school site that was negotiated out here when , this letter we got here from the School District says their no longer interested in that particular area. • Meridian City Council October 5, 1993 Page 4 Kingsford: Would you address that Mr. Forrey since you had conversation this afternoon with the School District. Forrey: Yes, thank you, Mr. Mayor,Members of the Council,and Councilman Tolsma. In the Conference of plan the School District identified generally where school sites were needed. In this section in the center generally is a school symbol. It is not necessarily site specific, it's floating, meaning in that section there, a school is needed. At the preliminary plat approval stage of this particular project I believe Don Hubble indicated that the developer would work with the School District to identify an acceptable site. And work through the this issue, and they have been doing that. And in fact they got to the point where I think Mr. Craig Groves - Help me Craig if I am getting this wrong. I'm getting it from Mr. Mabe, and I talked to him about 4:50 this afternoon. To help move that along and comply with the preliminary plat requirements Mr. Groves and Mr. Mabe have identified a farm owned by Mr. Davis that the School District felt was a good location and pretty much in the center of this section. they approached Mr. Davis and he indicated that he had no objections to a school site on his property if he would ever develop it. Mr.Mabe indicated he would like to something in writing, so to bring that to pass Mr. Groves kind of came up with an excellent idea and that is to negotiate a first right of way refusal between Mr. Davis, who owns this farm ground next to Summerfield and the School District. So Mr. Maye feels like the city could go ahead and approve the Final Plat, but he would like a condition on the approval that that agreement that first right of way refusal agreement be negotiated and signed by the School District and that Mr. Davis, I guess, or the appropriate parties, that then would give them the assurance that there is a school site there so that when development occurs they've got the ability to move in and the school problem. That would remove that stipulation from the preliminary plat would allow the Final Plat to be approved. So that was his specific request tonight that there be a stipulation on the approval of the Final Plat. Kingsford: Mr. Groves wants to speak to that issue so let's maybe clear that up. Craig you want to? r~ u Meridian City Council October 5, 1993 Page 5 ~J Groves: Over the last several months we've had many conversations with Mr. Davis and his wife about the possibility of a school site on their property. The conversation we've had with Mr. Davis is that if and when he is ready to sell his property, he certainly would not be opposed to selling his site to the school as long as it wasn't market value. And I have asked him if he would be opposed to putting that in writing and he kind of indicated,"well just have the School District call me and I'll tell them that over the phone" okay, I've told Mr. Mabe that we would try to get this in writing but you know he didn't express to me that is was a condition. I guess I'm confident that Mr. Davis is a man of his word, will if and when he is ready, he is a dairy farmer right now ha kind of indicated that if he sells it will be 5 to ten years from now. I don't know. what the school's needs are for a school site, Mr. Mabe had indicated to me that it would be five to seven years in that area. Now that could be sooner I don't know. Kingsford: First our concerns as are the Schools District's that something like that is a verbal thing is not binding certainly on Mr. Davis' heirs of successors and we want very much to aid the School District in ensuring that there is a site there. In my recommendation to council that we stipulate in the approval that we either get one a first right of refusal at market value from Davis or from this development. Or, an appropriate fee, you know to set aside on somewhere, and that could be in the negotiation. Groves: Well, I mean that is really coming from the Council, and it's not coming from the School District. Kingsford: The School District in our discussion with Mr. Mabe this afternoon,that was what he said and certainly what the letter form Mr. Mabe said is not concurrent with what we meant with School Board members a week ago last night. They asked us to give some help to them in locating sites conditioned approvals on that, so that's like a, Mr. Yerrington and Mr. Giesler and myself met with them and that was thrusted their conversation in. Groves: Like I said we will diligently work on the issue I would hope that it wouldn't be a condition of the approval, but. Meridian City Council October 5, 1993 Page 6 u Kingsford: Well, if it isn't we've got no handle. Groves: Yes, I understand that, other than you've got my word that I'll work on it very hard to get it done. Kingsford: I feel good about that, but I'm not sure. Any other questions or comments from the Council? Tolsma: Mr. Mayor, I do have one question with Gary's few comments on the floor about that modeling data computer modeling data. Do we, should we have that also in the minutes as far as approval, that that is indeed done,because of the well situation out there. Mercle: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, I'd like to Kingsford: Would you state your name please. Mercle: I'm Jim Mercle with Hubble engineering, I'm a representative for the applicant. Regarding the school site issue I'd like to throw out a possible solution. the school site wouldn't be located in a Phase 1 portion of this 68 acre project, anyway. It would towards the center section, and if Mr. Davis, if we can't get our first right of refusal agreement with him, and if it would be in the Summerfield subdivision it would not be within the first phase it would be within the future phase, so one possible solution would to make a condition on the future phase but to hold up the first phase. Maybe those negotiations can't be done by the time we need the City Engineer to sign the Plat. And I don't feel the client should be held hostage for that issue on the first phase at least. ingsford: Any other comments from the Council? 71 lots,How many lots were in the entire? Mercle: 198 Kingsford: You can put that restriction on whoever the assessor was. Mr. Mercle the data that we have call out 71 lots. e ~ Meridian City Council October 5, 1993 gage 7 i Mercle: I think that's because on the application he included all the common areas and each individual area but there are only 61 fillable lots. Probably 10 common lots or landscape lots. Kingsford: What is the Council's pleasure? I think Mr. Mercle point is well taken we could hold the passage on the next date certainly. Tolsma: Mr. Mayor I would move to approve the Final Plat of the Summerfield subdivision 71 lot, subject to the engineers approval of his comments and that the School District site be included in the overall project but not necessarily n the Final Plat of the first phase. Kingsford: Is there a second? Yerrington: Second. Kingsford: It has been moved by Ron and seconded by Max to approve the Final Plat for Summerfield subdivision 71 lot conditioned upon engineer approval and subject to a stipulation the school site approval in the next phase, either there or negotiated in that section. All those in favor? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #3 - ROD'S PARKSIDE CREEK #4 106 LOTS BY L & R SALES Kingsford: Any questions or comments from the Council on that? Giesler: Mr. Mayor, I guess I'd like to have Gary explain some of his comments. Gary is any of these things been resolved, or is it sill pretty much, a lot of things to take of? Smith: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Giesler,~I received an updated Plat that, yesterday or this morning, from the Project Manager of Hubble engineers, and a letter of apology based on the incomplete lat that was submitted, I'm not up to speed on their operation on the computer edited drafting design system that they use nowadays, but apparently part of that program had been turned off r 1, U L~ °~~ ~ ~~ea T0: Meridian City Council DATE: March 24, 1994 RE: Summerfield Development FROM: Tom & Sue Davis Mayor Kingsford and Shari stating we were to furnish 14 developers in Section 32. Stiles sent us this attached letter, acres for school and park site for the In response to your letter dated February 28, 1994, that 14 acres of our property for a school and park site would be required to be donated or sold at pre-development prices etc. Gary Voight has bought 90 acres in Section 32, and Max Boesiger has 20 acres in Section 32. We feel the developers caused the need for a school and a park site with the influx of families that will be living in the Summerfield Subdivision. It's not your right to put this hardship on us and it's not your right to take our land from us. It seems to us that if the greedy developers want to continue the Summerfield Subdivision they should have planned ahead before starting their project. Don't blame us or put a guilt trip on us for not wanting to give, donate or sell for pre-developed prices at this time. We have lived on this farm/dairy for 35 years, worked 16-18 hour days, running our own business, then you inform us we must help the developers with a school, park site. We have paid for our land, kept our taxes paid wit~i hard work and determination. We haven't always gotten everything we wanted in life, so why should the City of Meridian set aside someone elses land for Gary Voight and Max Boesiger. Don't. say that you have a school and park site so Summerfield Subdivision can be completed. We have not signed any contract for this site on our land, so don't assume you have our land available for a school and park site. Tom & Sue Davis 2740 E. Ustick Road Me~:idian, ID 83642 • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Cierk "~ e ~ ~ERIDIAN I~~ 4~ 1V OBERT D!CORR E naer P.E. City Eng GARY D. SM T . WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. s t 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES up . JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste water KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief 1VIERIDIAIV, IDAHO 83642 Planner & Zoning Administrator W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chlaf JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887813 Chairman -Planning & Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor February 28, 1994 Tom and Sue Davis 2740 E. Ustick Road Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Davis: We understand, from talking to Mr. Craig Groves, that you had questions regarding how the City of Meridian views development in Section 32. On January 4, 1994, the City of Meridian adopted a new Comprehensive Plan. This Plan identifies future land use and public facilities needed to support quality development and growth in our community. One of the key components of this Comprehensive Plan is a policy directed at helping the Meridian School District obtain sites needed for schools. Our new Comprehensive Plan Map indicates an elementary school is needed in Section 32. The City has received various development requests in this section. and the City Council has indicated that there will be no further development in Section 32 until, the School District is satisfied they can acquire a suitable elementary school site. Currently. there is a 61-lot phase of Summerfield Subdivision under construction. but there will be no further development in Summerfield or anywhere else in this section until the School District has a site. The Meridian School District has identified the northwest corner of your property. which is near the center of Section 32, as the preferred site for the new elementary school. The City Council supports the School District's designation for an elementary school site at this location. If you ever decide to develop your property, or sell your property to a developer, the City of Meridian will require that a 14-acre site be either donated or made available at pre-development prices to the School District and City of Meridian for school and park site development. n- OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, Clty Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., Clty Engineer AA~ENIGRAND{,11i~ HUBOFTREASUREVALLEY A Good Place to Live COUNCILMEN CITY OF MERIDIAI~T ROBERT GI SLER 33 EAST IDAHO ROBERTD.ICORR E MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Chairman Zoning & Planning Phone (208) 888-4433 JIM JOHNSON FAX (208) 887-4813 Centennial Coorolnator GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor Tf3: Summerfield Estates File FR®M: Wayne S. Forrey, A{CP, Project C DATE: 02 March 1994 REGARDING: Compliance with Developers Construction of a Soccer Field and Public Hearing P~nt~t~t~n 1 have researched the~,~~ibl}~ hearing minutes and +rep~°~sentation by the applicant's represe~tive pertaining to the Soccer Fieltl-at Summerfield Estates. Commer~~s the a~~licant and citizens indicated that the soccer field would be fof youth p~~ci~ion. mention was made regarding adult soccer pa~cipatiort Sh'K%sw. The applicant ir~~e~tdbd ~o construct a open playfiefd about :100' square that could be used r a varietyyof outdoor activities b~/ the hornowners ;;. association. Arta residea~ts have the imlpression7that a soccer field is ,, much more than ~~st a small o,p area~,~ that a sq~ccr fie f >s a soccer Feld. Meetings v~h the ieveloper and citizens have beep positive and the applicant has rede~nedkhe open area to obtain ~~150';by 150' playfield. However, citizens few new~;,~nlarged area,is at't/2 of the area Y y. needed to constitute a ~ seer field. Gins have requested a soccer ., ~~ field in the size magnitude`~of °fg~' by ~0' w~h~is a regulation adult soccer field. The standard for this sine "f9i'etdr,ls~„o~te per 5000 population. The question that must be answered is "what is an a~gr®priate size s®eeer field in the Su erfield Estates pr®ject?" To help the developer and citizens get an answer #o this question and proceed with final plat signatures, the City of Meridian will use the Minimum Standards of the Idaho Dept. of Parks ~ Recreation fora Youth Soccer Field The minimum dimensions of a you#h soccer Feld capable of accommodating age 4 through age 10 is: 210' long by 120' wide. This size will satisfy City requirements and allow plat signature. Please refer to the inserted drawing on the next page for additional Youth Soccer dimensions. .: ! • The City understands that the developer is not required to develop a soccer field as part of the final plat approval of Summerfield Estates #1 Subdivision. All that is required is adequate open developed turf space to allow a soccer field if the homeowners association desires to stripe and install goals at some point in the future. It is entirely possible that the homeowners association will not develop a soccer field...however adequate open play field will be reserved for that future option. If the developer agrees to this size standard, the developer and City can proceed with final plat signature of Summerfield Estates #1 Subdivision. This Memorandum should be attached to the Develo.~ment Agreement as an exhibit or addendum. +E H ~ F 0 t I G C A B Dimensions A=210' B=120' C=24' D=3'radius E=18' F=18' G=24' HBzl=42' FROM WAYNE ~ _E`t~itREY _ r ~ .. ,..~ .~ L Ai .+e 3 0 r~ ~~ O 5 Y 4 .~ ~ N J [© ~ Q ~ ~ M ~ ~.~a ~ yE ~ ~ 'V __ ~ IA !A M1 ~ ~ ~i a~~ ~_ ~~ ~~~a ~ ~~~ ~ e"tyy' ~ ~ a p) cy .n U c p ;~ o } o },a r ~" c"-a ~ A ~'a,~wa.~,~ t ®~ca~p:a~ ~ ~n vi p ~i+ w-- 'M ~- ,p ~G ~ c3 t a~-T~'.s O fj mv~t~ O V N t4 `~ 'C ~- ~. ~ ~ C p ~ .C a ../ flL ` Eq = •~r eDS +Q ~~"` ep T} ~~,1-- w~ N- p uu a ~ ~ .~ °' v''~ t"fE~lnOai-~,ES~''ro t~7~_c~.-c~a C~ v~,;•07 ~_~ m a o~[a'~co'C?y- ~~ a.~ ~ ~~` a ~ `'~ et _ ~ee~ -~ '~ ~ ~,~~e ~t YF,~,d~+'.T.. ~$o os~~~m d.~mu~ti } ~~ phi ~i '~ c e ~ ,~ ~~a~x p ~~~~~T .~ ~.c~+.i~ aw ~~. b o vw ,~. ~~i S~"~~y ~'Y p~ q}Ow°~I ~~~ ~~~ ~ 1- 2 .~r.ciVWu P, OQI PLAYING FIE~O LAYC1~1'Y ~~ F, ~,, r ti ~ ~_ ,- . ~ i ~ ~ ,~r,~w,o~ ~ - , s~~,> , ~; ~` V~ARRANTX :DEED ~ ~q ,~ ~, rw , ~~~ For Value 8eeeived:.... <._ ;7 the >~rantor, , t~oee hereby t~tr barBsinr si~11 atrd,convey auto k~ `` '2'QP~1~E.a}DhVIS and SIJE C..~:DA9IS, husband and ,WAfe , a , "- c ~t~ r ,,~ t , _ ~ ~e grantees. th'`e i'ollowing described premises, Ada »:. Conpty Idaho, +o wit ; p~ 4 ~ 1, ~`,~~; ,e,`.< h_, ~~ .D~ :. }wa.k. v.;'a" ~;t'i' .ri,', ..te ,r_ , .,~ ~ c.. . ,'>.'he SW~ of the SEi and the: E~ of„the SE~t°of the SW~, all fn"• _ :.. ,: S~ictioa~.32; s'Tot"tnsbig.4_Norsh, Range- 1 East, :gois~e_~Meridian, Ada. ,` ~, 'adz a ~,!'~ti ~fiw ~# e~ Also;'Beginaing at the center of~Section 32, Tovmship 4 North, Rance 1:8ast,;of,:the'Boise Meridians thence south 89°¢2', Weal a].enq - the .East aag -'T+fest .:center line of said Section 32, 90..9 feet..: ~- ~ a poi.Tst a 'the real point of beginn3.nq thecae Sontb=T3°06'-East 109:00 feet;-thence South 29°46' East 43.3 feet thence South 53°13•'East 164.8 feet;. thence South '` 65.27';:East 111.0 "feetf`•thence South 65°09' East 283.7 feet=thence South .78°21'.;East 160.9 feet; thence South 70°47' East 121.5 festt'thence.South_63°04p East 177.5 feet: thence South48°11' East ~ 198.6`feat= thence South 32°11• East 201.4 feet thence South j 4S°24'' East 99.3 feet; thence South 27°~;:' East 267.8 feet; thence South 0°22':tie t 159.2 feet to the South line o: N~ of the S~ 0 of said:Sec 3Z• thence e , S uth 89 50 West along the South line of the N~ of-the S~,of said Sec. 32,, 1989.5 feet to the Southwest corner. of the E~ of the NEB of the SW's of Sec. 32; thence North along the West line of the E'~ of the 1`E'a of the SW; of said Sec. 32, 1327.9 feet to the East and West center line of said.SeC. 32= thence North 89°42' East along the East and West ~'~ center 13ne`of said: Sec. 32, 573.4 feet to the real point of .. _ be ~.ns~ .e ~~ Together with all Qaater, water rights, ditches and ditch rights of ~;ay appurtenant thereto `or used on connection therewith. 'Sub3ectYao liens for taxes and assessments and that certain mortgage dated April 13, 1962 in favor of Prudential Insurance Company of America to secure the yymens of $35 000 and interest, recorded as Instrument No. 525873 o~Ada County, fdaho. - TO HEAVE AND TO iiOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantee; the r ~ heirs and assigns forever. Artd tr 2 said Grantor do es hereby covenstnt to and =:- ~rith the said Grantees . that they the owners in fee simple of said premises ; that sstid premises ore free from all incnmbrances .~ ~s~ °. and that they wiU •satTart .and .defend the same ftbm all lawful claims w tsoever. Dattd:.(Vo vP~..f, r,. (L / 9rD 3 ~ ,. LOi7ISE W.' DAVIS ~ STATE' OF 11)AHO, COUNT° OF ~:= . -„' 19 Uu this ~ (~ ~Y ~i STATE OF IUASO, .COUNTY OF [herb tl certif t this i Rl d ; IJovembeY 7~' ' y y~ y ns~ment w ~ nr record at e ' before me a notary public in ana forsaid State, personal y ' the request of B~'~'tJ apP~red LOIIISE W. DAVIS ~ - _ ~4r at ~ ~ miautes past /O o'clock ~. y, SS`` S ~NL K+~ „1r`,'~ ~ Se'"e ; ......... ~ ; : ~* , thia // ~7~ day of ~..!-~ 1910 i lA d d l d ` . ~ t r ~ ~,, a ~ ` , ~ .' 1 Q A ` ~ t.< , n my o ce, an u y recor ed in Book of Deeds at page ' ~1 ?~ ~(lf~tw'it to ni~'ty~ jl-s whoge name 1S ~ ~ j it~tt,77 Qndb ~ri ~tCsfu t~-and acknowledged to scc~r- t GIrP-RFNCE A pL.A1FJi'-Y~t© ~ ~fnt~~` '" _~ executed the same. .r~~ . i \l Ex-Officio Recorder . :i ~ ~''y~' Jt ~ ~ ~/ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ' - "N :L-e~iG , B 1 ) 1 - vQ t :- ,,, otary Pubiie le ,Idaho ~ •')ta ~'d~'+ngta~f~ i Deputy. Fees S~„-~ , , g -fi., 7: `/. 3 $` ,, ~~; f d4~ , . • ~ UITCLAIM DEED ,, ~ Q ~t,,, ~t FOR VALUE REC]c:IVED t TOM E. DAVZS and, SUE C.~DAMS, husband and wife? • do hereby convey. relertse, remise and forever quit claim '~ unto TONd E. DAVIS and SUE C. DAVIS, husband and wife ~~ whose address is 2740 E. Ustick, N.eridian, Idaho 3~ the ffoUowing described premises. to-wit: Description attached '~~ ~,~ . - _ ~1 together with tht it .rpi.ar}.•r.:.:u•r•-. ~a _f Uat~-d: blanch ' , 1:•7`: ~ __ ~.rri~ I ' ~ ~i-v-.. ` ~y ~' , ~. . r r -- 'S STA•f}: a}' I{r.aHrr. ~rt'~'~'i .c itDn 4 ... .. ~~ .. `~ un thi. LSt .:r} •f „r.~Ct: ~. i •r r. ,, . ~:+ before me, a nu~:~n• pub:.. .r...r,,.., r ... .....~.. I ^j appeared , ^i .. ;S Tom E. Davis ar.c? Sce C. Davis ,~-~` . 1~ ~ known r.. m.• , . tr. .•, r.~rnon 5 w S@r;..r•i. _ arE .. ~.. ~\~ - ~1 /SU}..Cti Lc-. .u1ih.• ~. :'. r,.n :rt.u•u;n•. ... ~: .,,.c .•.. .. ~ _ ~\ ~~, me th t tt:2V •.~•~. •: •k••4...,. `~ `J -. ~ / it { Comm. }:x;,lr.•, 't." l ~~ ~'~ ' i . r - . L ~? ' J PIONEER TITLE COMPANr F " •+ ~~ ~~ O AUh COUP~T / trfG .. .- r,sc-S' ,~S Repreaenlmg Pioneer National Tr~r.. rnwren~e s , s~ %~i ~~ ~~ i• ~~. .., ~+ s^ ,. ~~ ~, ~ , + f ~ I - P~ 1 *t•. ~ ~ r '' ~ r ~', LEGAL D~R1PTlON Tom Dnvls Job ~ 78-~f69 ~ • l•, A tract o1 lanes situat~l in the Sowtheast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter w p ° of S~~ctlat 32. 'II'ownship 4 North, Ra~~ge 1 Gzst. 13uisc Nlvridian. Ada y,,~ ;~ r:ountyi lda~o~ described as follows: ~. ~ l~ y' l3eginnins at the Southeast corner of said Section 32. thence 5• t59° -12' W • .s - along the South line of Section~32 a distance of 1326.94 feet to the South- ~.` ^s . east corner of the said South~t Quarter Souther Quarter, being the ~:; • Real Point Of lleginning: oj'~' eajT ^~ ~~ thence N. 0° 37' W. along the East boundary of said Southeast '~? :~ Quarter Southwest Quarter a distance of 323.0.4 feet; _~ thence S. 88° 44' 16" W. a distance of 1-19.37 sect: ~ ~~ ° .. thence 5. 1 l8 21 W. a distance of ]Ol • 76 feet; thence S. 89° ~~ l0'~ W. a distance of 19. 15 fact; ~ ~' ~~ ° ~~ ; • thence S. 2 55 W W. a .•iistance of 25. b0 fv~•t: ~? thence S. 88° 13' 47" W. a distance c~i 16.5.1 fv~t; ~: ;u y~ thence N. 0° 27' 20" L'•. a diswncc of 2u. 15 fttcl.; thence S. 89° 35' 10" W. a clistanc.: ui 72.9O fu~t; <°% Cl1i:nCt: S. ~° 27• (~~~ L• 1 dl$tan.a: Ui 21 ii.Jy i~CC :U :~ ~l~~~ili ail Lill: -- said South l..inc of sail Sc~::ion 32; " ~,~;. _ - thcnc.: v. iS9` •12' E. along s.iid South lino a .listan.: _• c~; 2~. (,® feet to the Real Point Of llc~*'-nning. Y' ,: ~, ~,. _. The above describe) tract Uf Tagil i:Un[31nS 1. O% :1l:Yl•O~ il;O.-~ ~):' ;~•:+~, ••~Glt::i .-~ :~ is subject to all exostinb or rc:corJed easenu•nts ur ,•i;;nt's-ul-~+•.lv, l il~ ;, =~_--- r ~~ West~20.Or7feet-will-lam an access easement for t:ie: property to the ?iorl:h. ,•rtY Y y^' ~.,. $Saif 0` Itdyl t7•j ~1. ~ '- ~ ~~1.'1~J .. - 71:,o n• a fJxinrt:.7dot;cer:~. .a-~~'_~ 7° I•,f~r-~ ,. .o.: v..._~, - - ,, ~ ~~~~.1~~%, c/ ~/ C+~~r ... }' ~4 r~ =;~pia frl~ •,.a3~~ F ~ ' . t#T'~`-x~T lya+~}tr')~ C' i ` > 4".~ ~ ~ ff~ r ~~'~,::, rrt y~{tip SAL I~`~~ MGI~TGAGE ~ ' ~~', • ~h ~ "' ?,~ ~:. ~ 1 v{~A~~PRESi~tiS,7~hat~.ln~-~4tt1 r ~y Kac w ~'~ ;~':: ..~i. ~ "~ R•~- ~ V, s'~ to ,' t ~' 'IS ~.,~ - 6` ;' ==4: :~11 R,`:.tliufr.'°...° C...y~;n.~~n:.._ if.._i may'-= - ._ ~. _.~ -, d~ ~ r 278824=~~ The de~~-riptios of th.• real property co~e~Qd by this Martgage consists o~ one page marked Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and is by reference made a part hereof. Y __ 7 47 lwg. - 1 t x r t ~ AtA ! r ~ ~ ~ t ,.~.• ~ ~~~_~` y,~~ c~ Ol. ~ ~, y ` . ~ `_ riJiiC'EFi /// jjj~ herN~ler cslkd`the-Mort `~ ` ash ~~.grant,-t~+rgaitr, aeN. cuUVey And nartgage 'f ~ ` J SY~yLQG%~~~- to THE FEDERAL- LAND BANK OF SPOK.WE,`a ~rporatfa~ bi F;.,kane Wasl-- ' 'L*~utY , brgtarr. hereir>afte* called the 1Mort~gee, Ure foHoe+ing d~d real estate in the ~0 i Cotmty of~.. an :rState af~,Ids~t~ „~,• EXHIBIT "A" 0118824-8 PARCEL I: ----- - :\ The S1A4 of the SEit and the E~ of the SEA of the SWi,;, alI in Section 32, Townrhip 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Heridian, Ada County, Idaho. PARCEL II: Beginning at the center of Section 32, Tormehip 4 North, Range 1 East of the Boise tiaridiaa; thence South 89°42' West along the East and West centss ling of said Section 32, Q0.9 feet to a Foist, the real point of s,t beginning; thence South 13°06' East 109.00 feet; iheoce South 29°46' East 43.3 feet; taPnce South 53°13' East 164.A feet;'thence South 65°27` ~4- East 111.0 feat; thence South 6b'O9' East Z8" 7 f..:et; thence South 78°21° zest 160.9 feet; thence South 70°47` ..~.st i21.5 feet; thence South 63`04' East 177.3 feet; thence South 48°11' East 198.6 feat; -aence South 32°11' East 201.4 feet thence South 45°24° East 99.3 EePt; thence South 2?°06' East 267.8 fee*_; thence Sou'.h 0°22' West 159.2 feet to the South line of Nti of the S>S of said Sectt °n 32; thence South 89°50' West slung thn South line of the N~ of the Sy of said Section 32, 1989.5 fret to the Southwest corner of thr E~ of the NE% of the Su'-;, of Section 32; thence North along the West line of the E; of the 21F.!;, of the SWk of said Section 32, 1327.4 feet to the East and West ceatr•; line of ~~, said Section 32; then:.e North 89'42' East along the East and l+e.:t center lira of said Section 32, 573.4 feet to the real point of beginning. . H,., ~Ertception tbs following desczibed tract of land: PA>i~~•Ilit -- ~~ tract of land situated in the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast ' Quarter of Section 32, Tovoship 4 North. iZange 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. described as follows: Heginning at the Southeast corner of said Section 32, thence South 89°.c~ West along the South line of Section 32, a distance ~f 1324.94 fast to the Southeast corner of the said Southwest Quarter Southeast Quarter, being the Real Pciut of Beginning; thence Korth 0°37' West • along the East boundary of said Southwest Quarter Southeest QTiart~r a .~~ distance of 323.04 feet; thence South ls8°44'16" West a distance of 149.37 feet; thence South 1°18'21" West a distancr. o` 101.76 feet; ~ ~ thence South 89°35'10" West a distance of 19.15 feet; Lhenr_e South 2°55'04" West a distance of 25.80 feet; thence South 83°13'47" c;e•st a distance of i6.54 feet; thence North 0°27'20" East, a distance of "16.15 feet; thence South 89°35'10" West a distance of 12.90 feet; thence Soutn 0°27'03" East a distance of 218.59 feet Lo a point on the said South line of said Section 32; thence North 89°42' East along said South lire a distance of 263.10 feet to the Real Point Of~~H/eg?.nning. ~, ~ , -- b_ -. Y ~ ~~ ;'jtY7~4!~t~^ateE, W,'.wi. .. a.'>:5, _1~.Fu~'tr.1~::.1~.r'. nr tii h ,3, ~ ~ti ~ ~ • ~-- - -. .. .. .~rA«....,fs-,erAnretfldfet.:: - .. 1.lnitcd 5tGtes ot°_tl~R,. f -`, ~~ Idly tsar or trrezrfac` rr-rawith.. ;• sretm8~ccaitatt>ed. e • of seen . , -ta, ;pt~°in . >,~ sete~. ctx lase ~~ ~ .• ~ s- ~ ,.,~~~v~ f~_ !~ ~ _ ht ~ td~pht- bane E~ dgbt and Fawfai authority t0'C,ottVey 8nd matrfgage ~ }!, .?hat they ,are btvb>nY seFied of t~ ptettdset ,yure,~. and that`ttttld pt+eaabes rite' flees flroaa::aruum6ratoe: geed eacTt of the •mortgagors wiD arurmtt Ord defem dta samc~to t the;Iawhrt~dalas and detnstds:of,al~ petsaoa whomaetivu; md.ebis caenmtt shall not be extinguished by atry bnt tthdl ttm rtdtth the lad.. ~Yo pay rl debb and mosey warred hr'aelrj wl~n dua.. ,, ~"[o ~. the 6t~~~ and other tmprovernenta nav m htxraftxr atisdag on said premises in good repair; to ctrntplet.: without bnDtthtg, structure ar impraerrtent in progrt:ss, any improvements to existing delay the emsttne$m ea said premises of any ~tttnettrres bt pregtess, and my ;mprorematts ar remodel6tg for which the loan hereby secured was gzanted in whole or in part: `; .AO! to remWe or demdislt or permit the removal of demal~hntertt d any building thereon; to restore promptly in a good and '~ tsrmlrarron>ilte tttattmr mY btrilri3ng, structure tx improvement thereon whidt may be darnayed ar destroyed: to cwnply with all +?` covenartts. emditiats and restrietiom affeetL^q the property and .:s usP; no. to use n permit the less :'.ltrws. otrdinatxes. repdatiotas, ~r of said prertthes for trey unlawful rn objectlorrabk purpose; not to cut ar permit the cutting of timber from said premises except .~ fa domestic use; to maintain and cultvate the prerttisea in Bond and htrsbandlike manner, using appuneddandr cao eel f~ f enanto the ferh73ty thereof; .to kte~ the orchard on said lands properly irrigate', culti•rated, sprayed, p comrtti: or suffer waste of any kind upon said premaes; and to do :il acts or t. logs .teceaary to preserve all water rights now tx hereafter apptutasant to or used in connec6rxt whit said premises. ' To pay before deBnquency all taxes, assessments and other charges upon I }~rcmises, all assessments up+xr water company sack, and all rry ts, assessments and charges for water appurtenant t„ or used ,u conn~:+uxt with sail property; anJ t,~ suffer no other encumbr)~, charge or lien against said premises vvhi::b is superior to this mortgage. To keep/aU buildings naw existing or hereafter erected ccmtimuxrsly ensured against loss or u,•nagc by fire n,;l ~u.i! „thee risks in rttanner and form and in such company or companies and in such amounts as shall be satisfactory to the m,nt.agec; to pay til pn;mitrtm and.ebar®es on all such invirance when due; to deposit with the mortgagee t+ on request all insurance policies '~'S'a$~etbtg the premixes. with receipu showing payrrcemt of all premiums and charges affecting sa , pdicies: and the. all insurance whatsornr affee!irig the premises shall be made payable, in ax s>f I:r s, to the mortgagee, wit.. a bras payable clause in favor of and satisfactory to the martgagee. The mortgagee shall be entitled to receive the pnkeeds r>l any IcK~ under any a,rh policy which may be applied by the mortgagee upon the indebtedness hereby secured in such manner as it may elect. If any of the mortgaged property shall be taken under right of eminent •lom::m, ute motgagee shall he enndeJ at ru ~xttrtlte to receive all compensation for the portion taken and riarnages to the remaining portion, a+ to applied by :he murtg:pt-: p Indebtedness htreby secured in such manner as it shall elect. Shwld the mortgagors be or become in default in any of ells arvenants ra agreements he rem cretramcd, then Ili: m~ngagee (whether elecrag to declare the whoit indebtedness hereby secured due and payable or not) rn•ay, at its r+ptiun, fwrt•'tm lire `~'~ in whole or in part and all expenditures made by the mortgagee in sn J,xnt;, together with mtcrr,t and ir.rs, shall f* Emmediately repayable by Ute mortgagors without demand, shall be sccurcJ by this mrxtgagc, and shall Jraw uuerest onul part at the default rates provided for in the rote hereby secured. Time is material and of the essence hereof; and in case of breach of any .+i the coven:urts or agreenrems here.+t, .,r rt dcLnt~! be made in the payrerettt of any of the sums hereby secured, ur if the wh,Je or •am~ po: ti,et of sail loan shall !,e e>, ,x necJ for purposes other than those speciixd in the original applicatirsr therefor except. h.• the ssnnen penmssnn, „t s:u~.l m~~ncaFer, or .r said land or any portiat thereof shall be hereaGer included in any special acussment district, then, r,r am -,~.I, ~~`~ atl indebtedness hereby secured, shall, at the e~cticxt of the mortg~ •e, twcunx inurn:diately due with,+ut nonce. tnJ !lus nuu~r;•ae may be frmclosed; but the failure of the mortgagee to exercise such opU,xt in ;uiy ,ere rx mcxe imt:uurs >iiall m,t it ~,aurJere i as a waver or rel"mquishntent of the right to exercise such option upon or During the crattinuance of tha Vn•e .+r any oilier default "- In s~se of any wit to ;rrred:ise this mortgage or to collect any charge gn,wing rut of the debt hereh- secure,I. ~+r an} amt ,'~k~which the mortgagee may tkem it necess-iry W prosetote or defend to effect •.+r protect ilrc lien hereof. ,..e m<xrF:n:~+rs -Fr`~!~ °*` pay a reasonable sum as attarrreys tees std all seats and Iegal expenses in ctnnr:ctirai with sanl sun. anJ iurth~•r aFrec t~+ p reasonzbk casts of searcL•ing reaxds and abstracting or insuring the :ills, and such Burns shall fx sewred hereby amt m.ludcJ m "<• the decree of foreclosure. r Upm or during Ure c. •rinwnce of arty default hereunJcr, the nuxry::x;ce shall have the nt;he t+•rihwub n+ rnt.i u,i„ y"~ uppt the mortgaged premises .end take ptxsessirm thereof, and ccdiect the mots, issues and piolits therrol; and apph• th,• •.urr. ,rc•, reasonable casts of coilectian, uprKt the indebtedness hereby secured, anJ the mortgagee shall hav_ the nr:ht to tl,c .rn+ nuuirlnt ,,t tofits rf the mortgage) nremi~c:. •f hr rents. issues l pnnu. ,.t ..,:,1 I^r;:uv..~:c,r a receiver to cdlect :he rents, issues and p default are hereby assig:ted anJ mortgaged to the mor tgagce as addit:rxtal security for the im relit: ,u.r~.. I~~ i~•u, r'c~_ut•r,l } r Delivered under anJ m ac.urJ.u,~e +.rlh tl~e I .~!", t ~.,'~~ ~-r 'r This mortgage and die note secured Here ry are exewted am. 1971 and any acts amemlawn• or supplementary thereto and P,e regu!atioris rl the nm l'~e,ht \Junnnu.,i,•,n. ,n,t .~ ~ •,, ~i-.! 'Z; to all the terms, cnnditiohs and purnisirrs !iiereol, which are nude a part hercrt der saner :,, a .rt ,•ur , ~ lull !.~:~;: The covenants acrd agreerrtents hereur cattained shall extend to .ntd hr binding upon the heirs. rvuutrKS, adnnnrnat„n. suecessrrrs and assrgrtc of the respective parties hereto ~. ~'' CENTRAL ~ - •• DISTRICT - ~THEALTH DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE • 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL, • BOISE, ID. 83704 • (208) 375-5211 • FAX: 327-8500 To preoent and treat disease and disability; to promote healthy lifestyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality of our environment. 94-008 ~~~~~~~~ January 4, 1994 JAN 1 0 1994 DAVID NAVARRO (' ®F ERI®U1V ADA COUNTY RECORDER 650 MAIN STREET BOISE ID 83702 RE: SUNlrlERFIELD SUBDIVISION NO. 1 Dear Mr. Navarro: Central District Health Department, Environmental Health Division has reviewed and do approve the final plat on this subdivision for central water and central sewer facilities. Final approval was given on December 29, 1993. No lot size may be reduced without prior approval of the health authority. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, ~~~ ~ ~~~~Ci~ Thomas E. Schmalz, E.H.S. Senior Environmental Health Specialist cc: Tom Turco, Director HUD City of Meridian Summerfield Development -Gary Voigt Hubble Engineering Ts:ch Serving Valley, Elmore, Boise, and Ada Counties Ada /Boise County Office WIC Boise • Meridian 707 N. Armshong PI. 1606 Roberts Boise, ID. 83104 Boise. ID. Enviro. Health: 327-7499 83705 Ph.334-3355 family Planning: 327-1400 324 Meridian, ID. Immunizotions: 321.1450 83642 Ph.888-6525 Nutrition: 327-7460 WIC: 327-7488 Elmore County Office 520 E. 8th Street N. Mountain Home. ID. 83647 Ph. 587-4401 Elmore County Office of Environmental Health 19o s. am street E. Mountain Home. ID. 83647 Ph. 587.9225 valley county Office P.O.Box1448 McCcll, ID. 83638 Ph. 634-7194 • IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE I ~ ..y.~~.~. DIVISION OF ~;~~, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 1420 North Hilton, Boise, ID 83706-1260, (208) 334-0550 December 21, 1993 Gary L. Voigt Summerfield Development 1277 E. 17th Street Idaho Falls, ID 83404 RE: Summerfield Subdivision No. 1 Water and Sewer Lines Meridian/Ado County Dear Mr. Voigt: c~ ®~ ~ ~ ~ /~8~8~ ®~ ~~~$~ SUNav1ERF[.APP ~~~~~~~~ 9 d. 'si ~'~'w~! Cecil D. Andrus, Governor The plans and specifications for the subject project appear to meet State of Idaho standards and are approved based on the conditions listed below. We therefore recommend that the District Health Department lift sanitary restrictions on the proposed development. 1. Please refer to the standard conditions in the Division of Environmental Quality (DEQ) review stamp on the documents. Also note that improver construction, operation, or maintenance may result in removal of the approval. 2. Please note that this project contains a subsurface stormwater disposal system that was neither reviewed or approved by DEQ. Any major changes or changes which would result in violations of Idaho regulations must be reviewed by this office prior to construction. This office must also be informed of construction scheduling so that spot inspections can be made as necessary. Construction must be done under the supervision of an Idaho registered professional engineer. Within thirty days after construction, this engineer must provide as-built plans or a letter of certification stating that the project was installed substantially according to the approved plans. Sincerely, cwt -'~ -.~ ck M. Gantz, enior Water Quality Engineer cc: Central District Health Department City of Meridian Hubble Engineering, Inc. OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer HUB • OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN COUNCILMEN Rio ERT t A (i ES ER 33 EAST IDAHO MAxYERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 cnalrman zoning s Planning Phone (208) 888-4433 JIM JOHNSON FAX (208) 887-4813 Centennlai Coordinator GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor September 20, 1993 Mr. Stephen T. Sherer" Attorney At Law Sherer Law Offices, P.A. 30 E. Franklin .Road' P.O. Box 31 Meridian, ID 83680 Re: Summerfeld Subdivision Dear idr. Sheref Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for annexation`` and zoning of Stlmerfield Subdivision. ,w... Also enclosed is a copy of Ordinance #619 dealing with annex- ation and zoning of Summerfield Subdivision. I am not aware of you being denied of public access to these documents. I am sorry if this has created any inconvenience for you. Sincerely r--. ~~~ Will Berg City Clerk STEPHEN T. SHERER ATTORNEY AT LAW SHERER LAW OFFICES, P.A. 208) 887-4800 AA77~~ 887800 P.O. BOX 31 30 E. FRANKLIN ROAD MERIDIAN ID 83680 ~~C~IVED ~ E P 4 7 4993 September 16, 1993 Meridian City Council Attention: Grant Kingsford 33 East Idaho Meridian ID 83642 Re: Gentlemen: Summerfield Subdivision CITY OF SRI®IAN I have twice been informed that the findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to annexation of land for the proposed Summerfield Subdivision are not available for public inspection. I have also been informed that the ordinance read at the public meeting on Tuesday, September 8, 1993, is not available. I will be glad to pay any reasonable photocopying charges to obtain copies of these documents. If you contend that neither one 1s a final document, then I would like to know the basis for their lack of finality or for withholding them from the public, since such information will be extremely relevant in assessing the timeliness of any appeal from the decision of the counsel. Please respond within five (5) days, since Meridian has same day mail and there must be an obvious answer of which I am not aware. Sinc r y, Stephe T. Sherer ~_~''Uw- STS/kjm cc: Wayne Crookston Ron Tolsma Bob Come Bob Gielser Max Yarrington ~ t ORDINANCE NO._~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NW1/4 OF THE SW1/4; AND THE SW1/4 OF THE SW1/4; AND A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SEl/4 OF THE SW1/4, ALZ IN SECTION 32, T. 4N., R. lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is hereinbelow described: ' The South half of the South half of the NW1/4 of the SW1/4; and the SWl/4 of the SWl/4; and a portion of the West half of the SE1/4 of the SW1/4, all in Section 32, T.4N. , R. lE. , B.M. , Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the corner common to Sections 31 and 32, T.4N., R.lE., and Sections 5 and 6, T.3N., R.lE., B.M.; thence North 00°00'08" West, 1661.81 feet to a 1/256 corner; from which the quarter corner common to said Sections 31 and 32 bears North 00°00'08" West, 997.19 feet; thence South 89°49'45" West, 1327.33 feet to a 1/256 corner; thence South 00°01'12" East, 331.83 feet to a 5/8" iron pin marking the SW1/16 corner; thence North 89°49'16" East, 663.49 feet to a 5/8" iron pin marking the C-E-SW1/64 corner; thence South 00°01'36" East along the East boundary of the West half of the SE1/4 of the SW1/4, 1031.32 feet to a point; thence South 89°43'17" West, 200.00 feet to a point; thence South 00°01'36" East, 295.00 feet to a point on the South boundary of said Section 32; _ thence South 89°43'17" West, 1791.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the above and referenced real property described as: The South half of the South half of the NW1/4 of the SW1/4; and the SW1/4 of the SW1/4;-and a portion of the West half of the SE1/4 of the SW1/4, all in Section 32, T.4N., R.lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the corner common to Sections 31 and 32, T.4N., R.lE., and Sections 5 and 6, T.3N., R.lE., B.M.; thence North 00°00'08" West, 1661.81 feet to a 1/256 corner; from which the quarter corner common to said Sections 31 and 32 bears North 00°00'08" West, 997.19 feet; thence South 89°49'45" West, 1327.33 feet to a 1/256 corner; thence South 00°01'12" East, 331.83 feet to a 5/8" iron pin marking the SW1/16 corner; thence North 89°49'16" East, 663.49 feet to a 5/8" iron pin marking the C-E-SW1/64 corner; thence South 00°01'36" East along the East boundary of the West half of the SE1/4 of the SW1/4, 1031.32 feet to a point; thence South 89°43'17" West, 200.00 feet to a point; thence South 00°01'36" East, 295.00 feet to a point on the South boundary of said Section 32; thence South 89°43'17" West, 1791.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and is zoned R-4 Residential; that the reason for the R-4 zoning is to allow 200 single family dwelling units on the parcel which would be an approximate density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre, which would be allowed in the R-4 Residential zone; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning; that Applicant pay any development fee or transfer fee if adopted by the City of Meridian; that Applicant shall pay any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City of Meridian as a condition of annexation and if not paid the land shall be de-annexed. Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de- annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: 1. Plat the property as submitted by Applicant, designate on the plat that only single-family dwellings shall be allowed, and allow only single-family houses of at least 1,500 square feet for single level homes and 1,800.00 square feet for double level homes, as agreed to by the Applicant, within the subdivision. 2. Tile all ditches, canals and waterways, including those that are property boundaries or only partially located on the property. 3. Extend and construct water and sewer line extensions to serve the property and connection to Meridian water and sewer lines shall be made. 4. Construct streets to and within the property. 5. Dedicate the necessary land from the centerline of Ustick and Locust Grove Roads for public right-of-way. 6. Allow only houses of at least 1,500 square feet for single level houses and 1,800 square feet for double level houses. 7. Pay any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City of Meridian. 8. Enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2- 416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address, but not be limited to, the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C., G., B. 2, R., L. and the comments of the Planning Director, Wayne Forrey, relating to the lack of adequate recreation facilities, a school site or fees in lieu thereof, and that land be set a side for a future park and relating to development of greenbelts along any canals or drainages within the subdivision. 9. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above conditions the property shall be subject to de-annexation, which conditions subsequent shall run with land and also be personal to_ the owner and Applicant. Section 4 . That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada • County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this 7th day of September, 1993. APPROVED: MAYOR -- GRANT I GSF RD ATTEST: r '~G~--~ CITY CLERK -- WILLI ERG STATE OF IDAHO,) • ss. County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM BERG, City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NW1/4 OF THE SW1/4; AND THE SW1/4 OF THE SW1/4; AND A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SE1/4 OF THE SW1/4, ALL IN SECTION 32, T. 4N., R. lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE"; passed as Ordinance No. ~f ~ , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the ~ day of , 1993 as the same appears in my office. ~ DATED this ~ day of "~~ , 1993. r~~~ City Clerk, City of ridian Ada County, Idaho STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) On this 7th day of September, 1993, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM BERG, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. ~,-::..., . A ;,,,,,\G E t Lii,,~~~,,. SEAL `.` 1, ~ °n®~ N ~ ~O$'~~~ O r ~'° ~$' zg at Meridian, Idaho ssion 04/01/99 C~ • BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION USTICR 40 ANNEBATION AND ZONING SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO MERIDIAN. IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for consideration -on June 8, 1993 at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Planning and Zoning Commission having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant appearing along with Dan Torfin, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for June 8, 1993 the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the June 8, 1993 hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 1 • 2. That the property included in the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this reference is incorporated herein; that the property is approximately 69.47 acres in size; it is located at the Northeast corner of Ustick Road and Locust Grove Road Intersection. 3. That the property is presently zoned by Ada County RT (Rural Transition) and the proposed use would be for R-4 Residential type development and the Applicant has submitted an application for subdivision approval. 4. The general area surrounding the property is used agriculturally and residentially. 5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits. 6. The Applicant is the owner of record of the property. 7. That the property included in the annexation and zoning application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 8. That the entire parcel of ground is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. That the Application requests that the parcel be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential; that the present use of the property is for agriculture; that the applicant indicated that the intended development of the property is for an R-4 type subdivision and in the subdivision Application stated the density would be approximately 3.0 dwelling units per acre, the smallest density being 2.8 units per acre, and that the square footage requirement FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 2 • of 1,500 square feet for the R-4 District would be met. 10. There were property owners in the immediate area that testified objecting to the application; that Vern Alman, a neighbor to the south across Ustick is concerned about the traffic increase on Ustick, overcrowding of schools and the extra burden upon the fire department; Herb Endicott had concerns over the well impact; Herb Dalwrimple had questions and concerns over the annexation since the City is questioning the additional city services that would be required and he had concerns over storm drainage; Tom Davis owner of property to the east wants to see a six foot chain length fence put up as a retaining fence; Beverly Donough desired to have this matter continued until the Comprehensive Plan was updated and she had concerns over the impact on the schools and the one acre lots to the north, she also submitted a Petition; Craig Groves spoke in support of Mr. Voigt; he favors a transfer fee as a local option; Peggy Moyer, an owner in Paradise Subdivision, had concerns over the impact and overcrowding of the schools, she would also like to see the roads widened before development, she also desired that this matter be continued until the Comprehensive Plan was updated; that Leon Johnson wants the land widened on Locust Grove and has concerns and questions over the annexation; Diane Beaulieu does not want to see a suburbia area for Meridian; and Jim Hollister owns property directly north of the proposed subdivision and he had no comment on the access to his property. 11. That the property is in the NORTH CURVE NEIGHBORHOOD as set forth in Policy Diagram in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 3 • that under Housing Development on page 25 and 26 of the Comprehensive Plan property inside the Urban Service Planning Area may be developed at greater densities than one dwelling unit per acre. 12. That in the Rural Area section of the Comprehensive Plan it does state that land in agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity until it is no longer economical to exclude orderly growth and development to maintain agricultural pursuits. 13. That Meridian has, and is, experiencing a population increase; that there are pressures on land previously used for agricultural uses to be developed into residential subdivision lots. 14. That the property can be serviced with City water and sewer. 15. The Meridian School District submitted comment and such is incorporated herein as if set forth in full; its comment was that there is no excess capacity in the schools of the District and that residents of the new subdivision could not be assured of attending the neighborhood schools; the School District asked for support for a development fee or a transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional schools. 16. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code, relating to subdivision ordinances, stated as follows: "Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 4 of subdivision development on the ability of political subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to deliver services without compromising quality of service delivery to current residents or imposing substantial additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the proposed subdivision."; that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in population that is occurring and with its impact on the City being able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase - in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School District which provide school service to current and future residents of the City; that the City knows that the increase in population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to provide for school services to current and future students. 17. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which if possible would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in the City, because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian. 18. That the R-4, Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 3 as follows: (R-4) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT: The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLU~ION3 OF LAW -- PAGE 5 density single-family dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominantly residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan or the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non- residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four ( 4 ) dwellings units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian. 19. That the Applicant's representative stated that the homes would have a minimum size of 1,500 square feet, that he would commit to a well site; that he would have berms and landscaping on the entrances, and he stated that there was no planned amenities within the subdivision for recreation but would implement if the City staff came up with a requirement. 20. That Section 11-9-605 C states as follows: "Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas; the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide." 21. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows: "Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to screen the view from residential properties, such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right of way or utility easement;" 22. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows: "Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of the subdivision;" 23. That Section 11-9-605 R states as follows: "The extent and location of lands designed for linear open space corridors should be determined by natural features and, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 6 •, and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de-annexation. 14. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the annexation and zoning or R-4, Residential would be in the best interest of the City of Meridian. 15. That if the conditions of approval are not met the property shall be subject to de-annexation. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION COMMISSIONER HEPPER VOTED COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE VOTED (~ i[,0. COMMISSIONER SHEARER VOTED_ 4 Qd COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI VOTED (~~o~ The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning as stated above in the Conclusions of Law for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and that if the conditions are not met that the property be de-annexed. MOTION: APPROVED: V DISAPPROVED: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -- PAGE 11 ~ ~ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL SEPT. 7, 1943 PAGE 7 Don H~~bble: We were told that there might be a concern about the school district and Mr. Voi4t was flt^eoared to offer whatever assistance needed to be offered ~n__arder to help rovide a site for that sc ool. Kingsfot^d: I assume he's acceptable to a development agree Fnt to that effect.- ., Tolsma: Would this be an entire school site or ,just partial school site or? • Kingsford: I think that's something he would be negotiating with the school district. For the record then the a licant is willing to negotiate with a sc ool district on a school site. Hubble: Correct. Kingsford: Any questions for Mr. Hubble? Giesler: If that is the case what would happen to the impact fees that they agree to? Kingsford: That would be subject to whatever agt^eement they have with the school district. tExplanation given - see tape3 The Motion was made by Gieslet^ and seconded by Yerrington to approve the Findings of Fact ar~d Conclusions of Law for request for annexation and zoning to R-4 with preliminary plat for A-^te and Vaughn. Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Tolsma - Yea; Giesler - Yea; Corrie - Vea; Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #~4: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING TO R-9 WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CHAMBERLAIN ESTATES BY KEVIN HOWELL: The Motion was made by Yerrington and seconded by Corrie to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law an the annexation and zoning to R-8 with preliminary plat for Chamberlain Estates.• Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Giesler - Yea; Corrie Yea; Tolsma - Yea; - DATE cz~~~ ~/ ~~J MERIDIAN CITY C(~CIL AGENDA ITEM NUMBER APPLICANT: .G. Q/ ~ ~ @ei' "~ 6~6vh 2i'J REQUEST: AGENCY MERIDIAN POLICE - r~Q1//P~eJ~'~ ~~ COMMENTS: MERIDIAN FIRE DEPT. - wee Q~ac~ed~C'olvtn7e~~''T MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER - ~`Q.Q at~aC~~d L'Oh>!i'~2QI~i~S MERIDIAN ATTORNEY - MERIDIAN POST OFFICE - MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT - MERIDIAN BUILDING DEPT. - ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT - ADA STREET NAME COMMITTEE - CENTRAL D I STR I CT HEALTH - ,S'Q Q ~~G~.e~° NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION - SETTLERS IRRIGATION - IDAHO POWER - US WEST - INTERMOUNTAIN GAS - BUREAU OF RECLAMATION - MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY - ~~ ~(,`!q' MERIDIAN PLANNING DIRECTOR - see a~~~~ied~ CO~n`~-r~~a~ OTHER COMMENTS: HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live WAYNE S.FORREY,AICP,CItyClerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer CITY ~F MERIDIAN COl,NCILMEN RONALD R TOLSM BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. . A WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste water supt. 33 EAST IDAHO ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 ROBERT D. CORRIE BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH. P.E., City Engineer , Phone (208) 888-4433 Chairman Zoning S Planning JIM JOHNSON FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your com ents and r commendations will be considered by the Meridian may we have your answer by: ~- ' TRANSMITTAL DATE: `~~~IRILY~~'r ~ . , _~ HE_A~tING DATE : ~__,~~~~.~3 REQUEST : ''~ ~ ~L BY ~ . L • ~ C~ t[Lt ~~. LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR JIM JOHNSON P/I MOE ALIDJANI,P/I JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNIREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, PII GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C BOB GIESLER, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTOR ,[,FIRE DEPARTMENT / "POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY 6ARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER ,,vim ;.~~ , . PROJECT ; ~C_ `'~ al , ~'~ y ~ , ~ ~ ~ l HfRIDTAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND~FINAL PLATS} '~ ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY'DISTRICT ,... >,:. ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR:wDISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION=DISTRICT IDAHO POWE&.C4;~-(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) ~` t1:5:' WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) CITY FILES OTHER' `-~ ~° 93 YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Cc.). LL ~'V.~-~ ~~..~ ~,,~,®S ~.. $(a m ~ e r h ~ i 6- fS P'. t~/~ 9.~ t [, C ru a@.. ai'd ~ °~ 1'3 d2 /`~~ 1Af 1. L°~'`4 cg9 ~`,~ Ls ~. ~ ~s ~ 7-~~a s ~ ~ COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ~~ CENTRAL ~ •• DISTRICT HEALTH ~~~~E~etum to: DEPARTMENT S EP ~ ® ~~~~ ^ Bois@ REVIEW 5'HEET J ^ Eagle CITY ~~ ~~~EF~~®1t~1~! ^ Garden City Reaone # ~. Meridian Conditional # ^ Kuna Preliminaryn /Short Plat _ 5~~~~~. ~iEV,~ ~~1~~r/iSi®e~ ~f ^ ACz ^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal. ^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. ^ 3. Spec'rfic knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewge disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. W n approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ~ 2 feet ^ 4 feet ~. 7. Aft~~erttwritten approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ~t Central .sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water well ^ Interim sewage ® Central water ^ Individual sewage ^ Individual water ~- 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of HeaRh and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ~- Central sewage Community sewage system^ Community water ^ Sewage dry lines D~ Central water ®- 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probelm. ^ 10. This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any: ^ 13: ^ Food establishment ^ Swimming pools or spas ^ Beverage establishment ^ Grocery store ^ Child Care Center DATE: ~,~ Reviewed by: CDHD 10-91 rcb • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live WAYNES.FORREY,AICP,CityClerk JANICE LASS Treasurer CITY OF MERIDI COUNCILMEN RON , BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. AN ALD R. TOLSMA ROBERTGIESLER WAYNEG.CROOKSTON,JR.,Attomey 33 EAST IDAHO MAXYERRINGTON JOHN 3HAWCROFT, Waste water supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ROBERT D. CORRIE BILL GORDON, Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 Chairman Zoning & Planning GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4$13 JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor MEMORANDIIM October 1, 1993 TO: MAYOR ~ CITY COIINCIL QOM: Gary D. Smith, P ~: SUMMERF'IELD SIIBD. NO.ly (Final Plat) I have reviewed this plat arldhave the "fclllowing comments for your information and o~;~~cor~ ideration as conditions of the applicant during the hearing-process: 1. This plat conforms with the lot and street arrangement previously approved a„s a pre~,u,ary plat. 2. Sheet No.l: a. Add Notr8: Maintenance responsibility for any irri- gation/drainage, pope crossing a 1ot_, is ...the... lot:. owners un- less assumt~d b~x~an :irrigation/drainage/highway district. b. Add Note 9: The bottom'elevaton of house footings shall be set a minimum of 12 inches above the highest known seasonal ground water elevation. c. Frontage dimension for Lot 20-Block l and Lot 2-Block 10 need to be ,80 feet. d. A small det~i:l should be shown for the street side property corner common -~o Loa 5/6-Block 1. e. The 25 foot dimension sh..owxl, on, I'~ Locust Grove Rd. from existing right of wa ~` °'°~` ~~ 20 feet. Yrv'~o`~ new right of way should be f. Show the extreme east dimension for the finger of Lot 11-Block 8. g. Re-dimension the side line common to Lot 12/13-Block 8. h. The sum of back lot line dimensions for Lots 15, 16- Block 8 don't equal the boundary dimension. i. The sum of back lot line dimensions for Lots 1,7,8- Block 4 don't equal the boundary dimension. j. Ashbury Ct. shown in Detail A & B should be Summerplace Ct.? k. Ustick Road should be shown as East instead of West. 1. Lots 8,9,10,23-Block 1 need to have a 40 foot chord. yt' _ • U MEMORANDIIM TO MAYOR & CITY CODNCIL PAGE 2 SIIMMERFIELD SIIBD. NO.1 (Final Plat) m. Submit street name approvals from the Ada County Street Name Committee. 3. Sheet No.2: a. Certificate of Owners- Line 9 - Change West designation to East for Ustick. Line 12 - Check lot dimensions to equal 284.50 feet. Line 14 - Check lot dimensions to equal 162.43 feet. Line 24 - Change ~•~est designation to East for Ustick. Line 25 - Change 6°aest designation to East for Ustick. b. Change County Engineer designation to County Surveyor? 4. The computer modeling data for our existing water systems ability to serve this subdivision has not been completed. The results of the modeling will show whether or not the well site needs to be developed with this subdivision. • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON. Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT 0. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI Memorandum To: Mayor, Council Members, Planning and Zoning Commissioners. From: Wayne S. Forrey, AICP -Planning Dir or Date: 30 Sep. 1993 _, " " Regarding: Summerfield Subdivlsion -Final Plat ~~k,++. ~~„~;. (. This Final Plat generally comp~esJ with the ongulal concept Hof the Preiminary Plat and it complies with the ~ulrent Mer~tarl Comprehensive Plan with the exception of Goal #7... "To provide community services. to ftt e~tingand proposed ~~eds.". A Elementary School site is needed in this arr,~ according to School District #2. The proposed Meridian Comprehensive .Plan indicates that a new school site is needed in this Planning Area to :meet exis~mg and proposed}schaolrservice needs: The developer indicates a willingness`to help end a school site -but no specific actions are progressing with the School District: The City may want to defer action'on this-Final Plat to allow more time for the developer.to workwith the School District°and evaluate school siting options. This Final Plat complies with the minimum requirements of the Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. ~~~ EX C f~! C7 `~ti Q ~~ SUPERINTENDENT OF SCH L . Bob L. Haley rs DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT Dan Mabe, Finance & Administration DIRECTORS Sheryl Belknap. Elementary Jim Carberry. Secondary Christine Donnell, Personnel Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 PHONE (208) 888-6701 October 5, 1993 Craig Grove 7733 Emerald Boise, Idaho 83704 Dear Mr. Grove: !,~ ., _. . 4. t ~~ ... ,1 Thanks for calling and discussing again the elementary school site in the Ustick -Locust Grove area. We do need a twelve (12) acre site in that square mile, but I feel the site should be nearer the center of the section. The Davis property would be the best. Perhaps we should approach Mr. Davis seeking a first right of way refusal on twelve (12) acres of his farm. If that hundred (100) acres develops we will certainly need awalk-in elementary school for the neighborhood. Sincerely, ~~~ %~a~ Dan Mabe, Deputy Superintendent DM:gr OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, Clty Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, FireChiet BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., Clty Engineer • HUB OF TREASURE i'ALLEY • A Good Place to Live CITY OF l~i/IERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208)888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERTGIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chalnnan Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your corn ents and r commendations will be considered by the Meridian ~ ma>- we have your answer by: r- ~ ' TRANSMITTAL DATF:~IJJG~ I~j:~.,...,::~.Ey4RING :~ RE®UES7 : ~i >nn ~ 1~In~ ~,°~ ~' _ _...E"~ 1~ `[ LOCATION OF PROPERTY DATE: ~,~3 OR PR'OJE~T~~.G ~a ~~y`V. ,1~• ~ ,~ y L~l~., JIM JOHNSON P/I ~i~IDIAN SCHOOL OISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z ~ '~MERIDI"AN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) ' JIM SHEARER, P/I ' ,,,~, ADA COUNTY HIGHWAI~ DISTRICT ~' ~~ . ~~` CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/1 ~~""` i ~: ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH P)'~~7~~ ~ 6rr_;~,r{~~ ' 2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TO NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR.~DISTRIC T ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ LSMA, C/C " ~^~~ ;_ SUTLERS IRirIGATIOH^DISTRICT °~~ '' BOB CORRIE, C/C '~~ IDAHO POWE&• Cff~:-(PRELIM AND FINAL PLA T~S~' ~ 1 ~? ~ 9 ? ~'. ` ~ `~ BOB GIESLER, C/C °~}~5;--WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) MAX YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) ' BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. CITY FILES BUILDING INSPECTOR OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Nampa ~ Meridian POLICE DEPARTMENT Irrigation Distnct:~s Milk.>Lhteral courses CITY ATTORNEY along the project s Sout oun ary. e 6ARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER right-of--way of the Milks is 30 feet- 15 WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER meet from the center each way See Idaho -1208--RIGHTS-OF-WAY NOT SIIBJECT TO ADVERSE POSSESSION THE DEVELOPER Est contact John Anderson or Bill 466 0663 or 345 2431 for l Henson at Nampa ik Meridian Irrigation District, , approva way occurs. All laterals and waste before any encroachment or change of right-of- ai ways must a protected. Al municipal surface be made available to all developmen ts within Nampa ~ Meridian Irrigation District. ~Oa EXCE`! 20 Fyn B ~~_ i • . SUPERINTENDENTOFSCHOOLS Bob L. Haley DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT Dan Mabe, Finance 8~ Administration DIRECTORS Sheryl Belknap, Elementary Jim Carberry, Secondary Christine Donnell, Personnel Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911MERIDIANSTREET MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 PHONE(208)888-6701 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Shari Stiles, City Planner FROM: ~,c Dan be u erintendent RE: Summer ield Subdivis o DATE: Marc , The school district does not want to stop this development, but does want a satisfactory school site near the center of the section. Apiece of the Davis property would be ideal. Fourteen or fifteen acres could be used to develop a joint park/school site. The school alone requires twelve acres. 3a If other property becomes available in section ~ we certainly would consider it in lieu of the Davis property. If something comes up will you inform us so we can make the best decision. /2 Q ~~ • ~ SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS ~~ Bob L. Haley oR EXIr'E~`~ DEP Dan Mabe, Flinan a 8~ Administration ti~ FED - ~ 1994 DIRECTORS R- Sheryl Belknap, Elementary ~' ®F ~~~~~~~ Jim Carberry, Secondary Christine Donnell, Personnel Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911MERIDIANSTREET MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 • PHONE(208)888-6701 January 26, 1994 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Summerfield Subdivision Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Summerfield Subdivision and find that it includes approximately 213 homes at the median value of $140,000. We also find that this subdivision is located in census tract 103.11 and in the attendance zone for Pioneer Elementary, Meridian Middle School and Centennial High School. Using the above information we can predict that these homes, when completed, will house 84 elementary aged children, 36 middle school aged children, and 52 senior high aged students. At the present time Pioneer Elementary is at 93~ of capacity, Meridian Middle is at 128 of capacity and Centennial High School is at 113 of capacity. The Meridian School District is not to ogposed to growth in our district, however this subdivision will cause increased over- crowding in two of the three schools and cause the other to be 105 of capacity. There is little opportunity to shift atten- dance boundaries since the surrounding schools are also well over capacity. Before we could support this subdivision, we would need land dedicated to the district or at least made available at a minimum price for a school site in this area. The site would need water and sewer service available. In addition we would need to pass another bond issue for the construction of schools. Even if we were willing to use portable classrooms for a year or two, this project would require two classrooms at the elementary level, two at the middle school level and two at the high school level. To build portables ready to occupy by students will cost approximately $40,000 each. As you can see the total for 6 portables would be $240,000. We would welcome a meeting with you to find ways of mitigating the projected costs to the school district. • . We are in a difficult position and need your help in dealing with the impact of growth on schools. Sincerely, ;~~~ ~~~~ 'Dan Mabe Deputy Superintendent DM:gr . SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS ~~~ i Bob L. Haley FOR EXCEt`~ DEP Dan Mabe, Flinan e & Administration ~ ~fi~ DIRECTORS ~~t\~~~ ~ Sheryl Belknap, Elementary ~ 1f Jim Carberry, Secondary Q Christine Donnell, Personnel y Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 PHONE(208)888-6701 September 14, 1993 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Summerfield Subdivision #1 Dear Commissioners: I have reviewed the application for Summerfield Subdivision #1. This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is beyond capacity. The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a need for additional school construction. We ask your support for a development fee statute on new home construction or a real estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we ask that additional residential development be denied. Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school as it may be necessary to bus students to available classrooms across the district. We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike paths and safe pedestrian access. Sincerely, Dan Mabe, Deputy Superintendent DM:gr O_ n •N - n ti m 1 a~ aH b ~- N O Y > M m N O Y V p ece u N N R n Y cn m m N Y VI Y w P •o O O 0 r N 1 O i fY ~ N 1 I i 1 1 1 1 O C M e Y p p Y .y~q rw p q N n n yN M a M N _ n M M O Y V Y • b p Y O• b Y Y Y Y A p t g r i.n.. _ ~ ~ H r .GI> U - Ri~nl ~c n•'o• ~.n .Na ~ N V ~. Rf r A '•I 1 - l T W a - ro ~W a ~.~ G - m n> T ~ N. i4 _ _ IW R IR> fr~>y 1 N O+ n .~-J ' • W O p !~ `p "a ~ x T I 1 s zf N •O rq G• = t~ • Y O N N YOjI m r•~1 Y1 N M N Y M Y O W p . ~ N ~ s Y ~ CnI N ~ n o., n •v w ~ -ai ~ ~ m m p tJ rs, o m O N O O; O x u I 4 ti m Y a N~ y _ n ~~ ~ 8 O W w 'O V O p 0 6~ O y N I T T M ~ o a O~ •O .Q _~ V T O qJ N BSI = Y N M ~ eo p ~~y HI 4 •b .Q W b O O A ry en a . °n "' 1"' n •O R> O Y O a P CJI 411 q ry .NO ~ N YW> m N m a W ~ sA• - r•" W Y W ! R> Y y tl ~ Y y ^> Y ~> ~ O• U ~.0 ~'.N=y N Nn N N N Y ry pey p `~ W~~ 9 ! Y O O. p T 1n1 N N. N = fV M rR~'VIN Qa ro M dl V, . b f" Y i r Oy •O Y P ~~ i11 y ~', R> N O' b O Y r n i11 _ •O N Ow• p: V M i~ Rai O M N, 01 e R> ? n W ~QQ to R> 11 Y y W q R> 4> M U W m n n ~ u a IV N Gfl n Y Y n Y n M n P q f@!1 0 Yl N 1 Y N Y t p Y Y Y M 67 M I _ N W ry V V O O-ii-//1lg~ C 6 O N N N M T b g rNry.. 1~.. V .ap V •O 1 1 O ~ •O J ~Tl ro = y oo _ b c m 6 4y1 1 _O~11 ~ 1> V ~1 ~~ ~,' _ ~ _ r ~ T d rl~ x n'£1 s• ~ s INI 2 ~,,, T Y] _ n o, r n ~rj T A - ry ppA W M G N• W h r N O ~ ~ a ° = ~ - ~r G n r m N Ir P .~~ 611 ~ _ N _~ ~ w _~ N ~• W t r O• ~~ V Vr 1~> r~ 11 _• ~ T O Inl O O •• T - N v ' T T M 1111 K bWf K ~ ~ _ ~ T ~; u - rrr~"~>r~ttt a o u o°-±ce~> ~ Y ~ ~ a W a . eR W Inl Rt - i ^j • ~ y N ~ O'i O ', O x O0 '. n=•> Inl ^ i ~ •Y n u ill n O 'M ~1 W INI ~' wi a V R>rW i ~ O N Ia O O.N i y q I ~TI~r'` ~ l", ~ V N O .. " ~ v b 1 y~W Y Y m m W = _ U N N IN m W 11 ~ J W N lnl R Y •- o•'m od O >v u : a. ~ 1 I ? "aJ' n e!- N i V 1"~ W N ry .~{ N N 11 A ~W .a N ~ y •O U a m 6n d r o u R] N n O P ; O• 611 '~N H ~ n n n 11 ~ 11 u 11 N 1 1 d b O 11 p O, O y a4 ro u ~~~emr=m N INI NI a e.> rv~ e•.> a o n eool'1~ r p N N.'. O n N V', V Qpa •r O = N e./1 J•~ W r T nn J 6~ •VO V Y fV N ~yi>~ .~,e~ m h J Yid W m t y R> p ~} O = 11 R> O '~ P O', N n 11 u R N N n w I _ ~~ Z S rrr M •... = ~ ' G a yr G r.. ~ +. r ~ T r•. T PS N r ~ ~ ' C. d C. C. s =• _ J. ."rGD .[m> r Y ~r j ^ T O Cr T= r x S Q~ ~1 ~ m~ C T y ~ in CJr o L. C TT = S St >e ~ C C. 9 ZI A Sr y Sr 2S FZr , ~ S 2 2 - - T T T ~> Cj r91 T O r y a ~ 2 rF N r T r A C fA.4 T T T ~ O O C'> Cyi IJ n y G N f"f ` T T ~ ~ ~ Y M • I n y Y y n n S. r N 9 A i x~ W 0 V ~> rV N r.Il u j _ W ~ O~ tr W W u Qr N wr N G .AC• Cn N> '~ ~ I ~ W .~ ti ~~ 4 N r N rr e.. A p K _ b I m 4> C O N N i rl• R tli tb ~ t. 1 i II ~ 1 ~ ti¢ GI W 4 G C. G- . ~~ ry N R O C• G C r Cwr . V P~ ^> y T n> C m N M r•1 K Y K na 6 ? - ~ 'v T Y 1n r .r..4y ~ 4 S. ~~ M IR .nI K• ~ V n N N 'I' j N H K iP/ rrNR 1•e ~ W i i i!1 l - 4r . G• R f.fr - ~ tN - T W .Ir N A > W 6u m .VC> ~ •a a n ° O I > > y c• ro r- Y 1 ~ O t r 1> _ 1 e"1 ~ O O ~ b G- I N N ' ~ /I 4r p U O. ~= G IJ ~ : •4 ~ R> Iv. s G eti l K ~ K i N 4 Q I is N K H M YC iaf ~ ml M 4. ti b RV> ~~ m~~ O T Z_ O T ~ a O • v ~ i.rr ti W r ~' . + - '.wP ~ + A i/1 P - W 11 ry = ~ ~ b m Cl1 ~ . n> ~ ~ • J y G t ry~ ro J e m b m a.• 0 lyie ~i lVi '~~~ m w . ~ R> ® O V ~ - - - N _ 611 +` O t ~ T O• Y W P P N a .L N N T W P Rr W OP- V O of ,3 ~ ~ m b• O N V O V O' P V R> V m ae a ~I Y I e ;52 W f ~ ~ N R/A R> . ~. ll> ti m r i(l~l N n 6 N V ~. ~- N P '~I t 9 A B Y • M« P P P i11 b ~ Yr T V d m r W N N m 0 0~ i i> W G IJ o- V 0 R> y m• tCq 'V O O N ~•~ n r N V O V . nl = N 1 a l P. W. •O ~ {Oy 0 6/1 Oa• A r v v o~ o o~ Q m _ N tl~ N K LC M N N N M N O O~ V` W m .! • O S. b~_ U N »t M Me M MI N M N IA N H eta 9 m m W ell `O lmq O g W G V N W .p N tY T O• m P V ~ . .. O ., L II G~ a~ 0 1`n °Y °~ W w ' :~ Yr Y m m W W b •P N V V ill P Oi P ~ ~ • O W . {e a P V .Pp .ap . ~ b V IuYI i W ~ P IPY VOl O ai U a a V y~ T R> V ~1 m m V W ~ R> V ro T m ~ n ~ ~ V 611 b m~ A? b ro OI L+ m b a~ ill .p Y N W 6PI1 O r9 O ' !y ! O ill O T O m W T m n N Itll P W J W O a ~ P m~ m O m 0• 1 ' 6 t O 6 P W V rmU .!r p W °r ~I ~ _ yO O• tl b b J- O• N V _ R rr o V• W rJl ^~ O y V tll •d O m p V v J ~ M Y ~` N b ' NI 'r R> I N ~ ~ y O ~ W Y i I V YI ~ Oi O O w ` 1 W ro O N a~_~ O Y m m J• w O V 0• N Y N N M m V R> W 611 N N N M M N o P N N M !! M N Ir i je e re K „ x S m •1 li r oaoo~>w...o!~1.>ro...p a ~o w m ~i:p ~.eeu .-... _ pp O R w r V ro t N N N N N M I Y~ N irf M K ~ e ~ ry M T ! t O Y M [ N rq S ~~I N C9 O• » d P N O O Or . V V • • p W~ W r m P t = M 0 R> O m~ O W M j , 0 _ .Q E W d m m W. P } b V 'C O .O V ' r~~ IO ter f> Y/ Y N O P ~• 1.11 N er• eo ~ M N V CI1 L V w ~ Oi ~ P O a A .mp N~ ry y m W p V W p b V W O• R> m Y .p N d ~ ~ O ~ (O>I amr a' b O GI p M V, Ri .~ .O V N N .p W_ W ~ p m b p O• O •r•~~•• - SS p T 0 y rA b P O d 0 V j 4 1 d P W N .a0 O 1C W R> "" N m N O ~ O• 6n P Y ~ P .p P Cmi V 6R O tml S/I O M _ _ _ _ J a 0 0 0 N b O 611 O M O R> O~O~fJI O V O O + 9 ' li ~ ~' r R > O O O O O~ 1 y1 • y . ,/1 n> M W ~t~^ O Y V A 1~• ~ M ry W_ P t N, V1' N O V M V m N -NA W Jm r I p P O O' ~O C pp ~,~..y= b b frNl.R mA A NI ro ~', W V P O O P O fai V /"' n o C •~.. N v w N y 0 0 ,' QppO O O ppO Op QQO O ~ O~pp O~~p~ O Q O p Oo O O O O O O O y Q m O O O „ N~ 0 - T q ~ p r ,Ole rO 0 M tl R M i i 0 M~ O~ O O~~ O~ g~~ ~.. `.! R> = ~ r /Oif M W 6W11 l s V Y TT N p ! ~- Cro/1 v y1 .•. i¢jl r ~' V~ V i N 1~> A ~ ~ Ir V rl a V m M y1s 1 1= ± •O V tr NI 6/1 ~ R> ., `r'I tV . V O• O i P 0 4a> .~> i V F eoii N~ R Of :~ YV b v O J b ti ~ W.~ C 4 V n e 0 0 V J W R 4> i i 4> P N~ ~i T i m Y i ` yy ll N u C• O N• N 0Y J sa i1l ...ie:. b A O W V? . .~ 1~0 . P. A p t + ~ Vf`I N« PO• P 611 a 1• O~ !m > Y N C/I OD •0 001 O m O V P r L • y • p 1~> / 1 ro ~ N T i y f Y R t y O Rl v ®, ~ O ~ ~^~I r _ - ••> ~ O + 1_ (~ .1p .. Of ~ d .n ~ ry~ p. ~ ~-- _ _. _ V O V.OO V ~ ~' ~~,.... P I%1 ~ ~ ~ it _ .. - V ~~ 0 ~ fA a 111 i•' ~ Q b .! _ __ wOar3 w1 yNZ111- rH'i eq _ V Of = T /p lR~>> 1ee+e ~ {$> y> O Sl9 V~ G O P ~ V ~ ~ gy 4 V ~ ~ _ ~t qq d .pp yyv •!1 y . y i!~ ! V l y m N m ro ~ N b W fe1 ~ 6• ~ ~ Cron f'1 P G Z• P i•9 ~ r ~ N 'O -. .. __ ~ y ~ ry W W >tl Joe+`~'oe~. P ~'~~' `.e-•ccRnsron s: ~~'`~~t ti~''°ti~ _ -s fir . '~. ._ -__ _ ~ _ s nr _ 1_ ~ _ V ~ m W t _... 41 _ r - - - - ~ ~. = .Pp /0 ~ 1-O 4> ,r~r ~ ~ /• W ®u_ = 61,1 ~ ~ J ~ _ -_.. {p _ A w O ~ •V R ~ trl ~ ~ ~p ~ b IN ~ OO~1 J ® W !P ® O p ti 41 C' ~ y4 a L. t A O t V N _~ N ._ _ ,~ m - _ g~~x - - - _ g owym> ,op1a _; ~W m{po/~. ~yN p i~ e~~> ~a ~ _ O RioW r0 MM e! ~00; R•e• JI w 1- .p - __ _ .. w O a~ N V .,. spa EXCEL! ~y ~~~ ~+ Q v- SUPERINTENDENT OF SCH . Bob L. Haley • DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT Dan Mabe, Finance & Administration DIRECTORS Sheryl Belknap.. Elementary Jim Carberry. Secondary Christine Donnell, Personnel Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCH TRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET • RIDIAN, IDAHO PHONE (2081888.6701 October 5, 1993 ~" $ ~ f ' 4 i V f.. J j~ ~. Craig Grove 7733 Emerald Boise, Idaho 83704 Dear Mr. Grove: Thanks for calling and discussing again the elementary school site in the Ustick -Locust Grove area. We do need a twelve (12) acre site in that square mile, but I feel the site should be nearer the center of the section. The Davis property would be the best. Perhaps we should approach Mr. Davis seeking a first right of way refusal on twelve (12) ~~res of ~~~ fem. If that hundred (100) ac- res develops we will certainly need awalk-in elementary school for the neighborhood. Sincerely, ~`~ %~a.~ Dan Mabe, Deputy Superintendent DM:gr T-?~c~n~.~~ cam, -~ ~an~ U~~- - t~- I`a-~° Gc~ -~ ~- -ice ~ola~' w i~ ~. ~~ ~ --vs-~ Ri/~c~' -~ SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Bob L. Haley ~ EXemF ~EPUTY SUPERINTENDENT ~® ~` Dan Mabe, Finance & Administration ~ ~~ DIRECTORS 2 ~~~,~~~ ~ Sheryl Belknap, Elementary ~ Jim Carberry, Secondary Q Christine Donnell, Personnel y Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET MERIDIAN, IDAH083642 PHONE (208)888-6701 October 5, 1993 Craig Grove 7733 Emerald Boise, Idaho 83704 Dear Mr. Grove: ~~~~ O C T 0 5 9993 CITY ~~ ~~~1~i~N Thanks for calling and discussing again the elementary school site in the Ustick - Locust Grove area. We do need a twelve (12) acre site in that square mile, but I feel the site should be nearer the center of the section. The Davis property would be the best. Perhaps we should approach Mr. Davis seeking a first right of way refusal on twelve (12) acres of his farm. If that hundred (100) acres develops we will certainly need ~a walk-in elementary school for the neighborhood. Sincerely, Dan Mabe, Deputy Superintendent DM:gr • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS WAYNES.FORREY,AICP,CityClerk JA CITY OF MERIDIAN COUNCILMEN RONALD R.TOLSMA NICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. ROBERT OIESLER WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MAX YERRINGTON JOHN SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. KENNY BO MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 ROBERT D. CORRIE WERS, Fire Chief ~ Chairman Zoning 8 Planning BILL GORDON, Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 JIM JOHNSON GARY SMITH, P.E.. City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 Centennial Coordinator GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor Memorandum To: Mayor, Council Members, Planning and Zoning Commissioners. From: Wayne S. Forney, AICP -Planning Dire or Date: 30 Sep. 1993 v x:~ X~`;. Regarding: Summerfiel°~'"ubdiv~ion -Final Plat This Final Plat gen~~.liy comps wit the origizl concept of the Pre~iltninary Plat and it ~. - complies with the c~rrent Meran CXN mpriens~e Pin v~~ith the exce~ion of Goal #7..."'1Co provide ~~ih`3's W ~t e+tg and,~r~~pQ~eds.". A Elementary Schoo~ bite is`ri a s trdin~ <ta iool Dis~tr'f~t #2. •4 : } ~. The proposed Meran Com~r~~shr~e Plan incl~cates that . new school site is needed in this Planning Area t--meet exi --oec~~are n The developer indicates a willingnes`s,~to help`~~nd a school site -but no specific act~t~ns are progressing with the School Distnc`~ .;:The pity may want to defer actic~~~~l:n t"Final Plat to allow more time for the develo~,s~o wor~ith the Schot~l strict `evaluate school siting options. .:. '~ t This Final Plat complies with the minimum ~~rements of the Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. • ~ ~~~~~~ ®~ T ~ 4 1993 SUBDIVLSION EVALUATION SHE~'T CITE ~a t0~e:~~i~lA~ Proposed Development Name SUMMERFIELD SUB N0. 1 City MERIDIAN Date Reviewed _09/23/93 Preliminary Stage Final %R%R%~IX Engineer/Developer Hubble Engr. / G L Voigt Date Sent The following SUBDIVISION NAME is approved by the Ada County Engineer or his designee per the requirements of the IDAHO STATE CODE. Si]rII~RFIELD SUBDIVISION N0. 1 %. Date The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Meridian City Street Name Ordinance. The following existing street names shall appear on the plat as "N. LOCUST GROVE ROAD" "W. USTICR ROAD" The following ~rovosed new street name are over ten letters in length and cannot be ayyroved unless Ada County Highway District will approve the length of the names in writing "E . SU!'Il~RHEIGHTS DRIVE" - "~ SU1+Il~RFALLS ~Q.1y~" "N SUMMERBROOK PLACE" `' 1~ ljiAM(rl ~ P ~j~DOK. ~~f E " - "t~ SU~'II~.RFIELD 114`( " "E SUMMERPLACE COURT" t~ The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMlITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMliITTEE Ada County Engineer John Priester Ada Planning Assoc. Meridian Fire Dist NOTE: A copy of this evaluation Engineer at the time of signing the signed !!!! Sub Index NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS Terri Raynor Representatiy Street Index DESIGNEES Date Z 3 / Date "13 Date sheet must be presented to the Ada County "final plat°, otherwise the plat will not be OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer HUB OF TREA,SUB'E VALLEY ~, A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO.83642 Phone (208)888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIE COUNCILMEN RONALOR.TOLSMA .ROBERT GIESIaEA MAX YERRINOTON ROBEAT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI S FOR COMMENTS ON QEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN.. To insure that your com ents and r commendations will be considered by the Meridian may we have your answer by: ' TRANSMITTAL DATE : ~~~~!~'~ ~....:N:..~}1E>~RING DATE ~~, a~ 3 RECUEST : ~i >nn 1 (~~n~- ~- ~ __ _.~" 1,' ~':` ..~ ,1 t LOCATION OF PROPE JIM JOHNSON P/Z MOE ALIDJANI,P/I JIM SHEARER, P/I CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/I TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C BOB GIESLER, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY fiARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER hERIDI~N SCii00l OI~TRICT -~ ~--IIERIDI'AN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS ) ADA COUNTY HIGHWA.1~ DISTRICT ~~ ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT i#EALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR K,IrLSTR'IC1 SEwTTLERS IRIII.GATION}DISTRICT IDAHO POWER..CO,~.-('PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) "~U~~S:--WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CO REMARKS: