The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCrossroad Subdivision PPI ~ ~..~ ~•~'• M l ] • • REQUEST FUR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zaning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request vas made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P. M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission, action. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Annexation a.nd Subdivision. Crossroads SubdiyiGinn SW1 4, Section 9, T.3N., R.IE., B.M., 2. General Location, Meridian; Ada County, Idaho 3. Owners of record, Gemtone. Inc. P.O. Box 2727 Address. __ Boise. ID .Zip 3701Telephone__343-4000 Capital Development 2304 N. Cole Road 4. Applicant, Corp. Address, Boise' ID 83704 r. Engineer, E. Don Hubble Firm Hubble Engineering, Inc. . Bete Court Address Boise. ID 83709 . Zip Telephone 322-8992 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name AgFlicant Address Telephone PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres 154.50 2. Number of lots 256 Residential, 5 Commercial, 19 Common Area 3. Lots per acre 3.42 Residential 4. Density per acre 3.42 Residential 5. Zoning Classif icati on c e ) I-L . •. ~ . „ ~ 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt No b. Have recreational easements been provided for No 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City No Explain 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? Yes Explain Private common areas to be maintained by Homeowners Association For future parks? No Explain 1l . What school t s ) service the area Meridian do you propose any agreements for future school sites No Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the City X Mater Supply X Fire Department Sanitarv Sewer Other _ Explain 13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination) Residential and Commercial 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single Family, Duplexes, I'lultiplexes, other Single Family 15. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot<s), 8,000 sq. ft. b. Minimum square footage of structure(s) 1,300 sq. ft. c. Are garages provides for, X square footage 400 s4. ft. d. Are other coverings provided for No e'ands ap~ co~monaareaeand entrandce i s~lands,Xas per Drestricbive covenants for each lot. t2) . ~ _' ~~ .~ ~ ~ f. Trees will be provided for % Trees will be maintained by Homeowners Association g. Sprinkler systems are provided for vPC h. Are there multiple units NO Type remarks i. Are there special set back requirements No Explain ~. Has off street parking been provided for_ NO . Explain k. Value range of property $100,000+ 1. Type of financing for development Standard Will be submitted at a m. Protective covenants were submitted . Date future date 16. Does the proposal land lock other property No Does it create Enclaves No STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is ir, conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. Development will connect to City services. 4. Development will comply with City Ordinances. 5. Preliminary Piat will include all appropriate easements. 6. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. (3) iv `s~ • ~_ _~, HUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 Project No. 93-009 March 16, 1993 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN THE NWi/4 OF SECTION 9, T.3N., R.1E., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO A parcel of land located in the NWi/4 of Section 9, T.3N., R.1 E., B.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a brass cap marking the Northwest corner of said NW1/4 of Section 9; thence South 01°08'45" West 184.99 feet along the Westerly boundary of said NW1/4 of Section 9 to an aluminum cap; thence South 89°35'07" East 25.00 feet to a point; thence North 58°10'32" East 53.64 feet to an iron pin on the intersection of the Easterly right-of-way line of North Eagle road and the Southerly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 30, also said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along the following courses and distances along the said Southerly right- of-way line of U.S. Highway 30: North 58°10'32" East 161.93 feet to an aluminum cap; thence South 89°35'00" East 410.00 feet to an aluminum cap; thence North 00°25'00" East 10.00 feet to an aluminum cap; thence South 89°35'00" East 2044.29 feet to an aluminum cap on the Easterly boundary of said NW1/4 of Section 9; thence leaving said Southerly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 30 South ~°48'14" West 2600.75 feet along the said Easterly boundary of the said NW1/4 of Section 9 to a brass cap marking the Southeast corner of said NW1/4 of Section 9; thence leaving said Easterly boundary of the NW1/4 of Section 9 North 89°20'17" West 2605.43 feet along the Southerly boundary of said NW1/4 of Section 9 to an iron pin on said Easterly boundary of North Eagle Road, said iron pin being 70.00 feet Easterly of the Southwest corner of the Southwest corner of said NW1/4 of Section 9; 208/322-8992 ^ Fax 208/378-0329 Page 1 of 2 Project No. 93-009 March 16, 1993 thence leaving said Southerly boundary of the NW1/4 of Section 9 North 01°08'45" East 2493.36 feet along said Easterly boundary of North Eagle Road to the Point of Beginning. Containing a calculated area of 154.50 acres, more or less. Subject to road, irrigation, and utility easements of record or use. Prepared By RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. from data of record DTP/bh/477.des Page 2 of 2 ~~ SENT PY: Thc~m~4 T. Wr~19ht Co~ 3-1c-9~ 2:33PM 20C~ ~7SSQ~ CCITT Q3;q 2 ~+~ n~~o v ~.., ~ ,L-S~L1~1lS~1 I ~rj Page i Thi^ Deed, made between UPLAND INDUBTRIEB of 3030 LHJ Freeway, Suit Texas y523A, Grantor, and of P. O. $ox 2'727, $aise, this ~ day of c ~", 1990, CORPORATION, a Nebras a cvrporatiot:, ~ 1500, Da].la®, County of Dallas, t~EMTbNE, INC., an Idaho oorporation, Idaho 83707., Grantee: WITNE9SETH, That Grantor, for and in vonsideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and Valuable consideration, to Grantor paid by GXentee, the reoeipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, has granted, bargained, said grid aonveyed, and by-these presents doe® grant, bargain, se7,], and csc~nvey unto Grantee, its sucaessors and assigns, forever, all of the real property ("Property"a situate in the City of Meridian, County of Ada, State oP Idaho, more p$rticularly desaribed in Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. EXCEPTING fro~u this grant end RESERVING unto Grantor, its successors and assigns, forever, all minerals end all mineral rights of every kind and character now known to exist or hereafter dfsQOVered, ir~c~.uding, without limi,tinq the generality of the fvregaing, oil and gas and rights thereto, together with the sole, exclum~.ve and perpetual right to exploX® for, remove and dispose of, said minerals by .any means or methods suitable to Grantor, its successors and aasighs, but without entering upon or usf.ng the eurfaoe of the lands hereby conveyed, and in such manner as not to damage the surface of said lanes or to interfere with the use thereof by Grantee, its successors ar ase~,gnsi. This deed 3s made BUB,TECT TO the foilowingt (a) All taxes pnd all assessments, ar, if payable in installments, ail installments of assaeesments, levied upon or asaea~oed against the premises described in Exhibit A which beoame or iaeey be©om* due and payable in the year 199Q shall b• prorated ass of the date of delivery of this deed by ©rantor to Grantee, said dente being the 3lstdny of August , 1990 and Grantee assumeB and agxeea tv pay, or to reimburse Grantor for, if paid by it, a~.l such taxes and assessments and installments of aasaagmente applicable to the SENT PY: Thomas T. Wright Co~ 3-12-9~ 2:34PM 2HH~ 755®~ CCITT C~~;# 3 s r M Y r i i Y i page period subsequent to the date of delivery of this deed and assumes ail taxes and all assessments and ail installments of assessments which may bmoome du. and payable after said years and tb) Any and all restriatians and limitations imposed by public authority, and any easements, restriatione, exceptions, reservations, conditions, and/or outetandi.ng rights of record. TO HAVE AND TO HOLb~ subject to the aforas-eid exoepticn and r+ac~ervation and other provisions, the said premises with all the rights and appurtenances thereunto belonging unto Grantee, itt3 t~ucceseors and assigns, fvreveri and Grantor hereby cavenantB with Grantee that it will warrant and defend the title to the said premises ulttty Glrantee, its successors and assigns, forever, except as hereinbefore mentioned, against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, from ar under it, but against none other. IN WITNE66 WHEREOF, G antor has paused thesd presents to be signed by its ;~~z- ~'~ ~c.-' President and attested by its Assistant Secretary, and is corporate seal to be hereunto affixed this !~'`` day of ~ , 1990. witne~ssa UPLAND INDUSTRIES CORPORATION ••7 Attest: ; , ,, -- i ,~_; ~''~ 'r~'~:~)y~, ~J_'tt~ri•~ ~~ (Seal} A~~'is as~t~cr .tart' V !1 L .~ ., , .,, ' ~ ... '~. ~ , ..... i ~/'~ ~ • , ~, s',.,, Fresident ~~`~ 7045 ADA COl!FdtY, I~1AN~ FOR _ ~'~A~T 1'111, '9o Auc fl~ 11 ~ JdHN as a +~~ca ~ er 1~h %S~ SENT BY: Thomas. T. Wrisht Go. 3-12-93 2:34PM ; STATE OF TEXAS ) ) COUNTY OF DALLAS ) 2084?55©-~ CCITT Q3: # 4 Pale 3 BEFORE 1~, th undezeigned authvrit , on~ th~® ,day paraanaliy appearQd - , u t~f UPLAND INDIJSTRZEB CORPORATTQN, mown to me o be the per®on whose name is subscribed to the #oregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he exeouted the same for the purpo®es and consl.deration thslsein expressed, in the capacity therein ettated, ae the nct and deed o£ said corporation. GIVEN UNDER MY HANb AND 1~EAL OF OFFICE the ~~ day of Q,,,sz _ 1994. ~~!~•~~,~ PAIb1Al.A ~ N~UMA~V hIOTARY PU~L1C ~~ State at texas '+,,~ ~ s~ Comm. Grp. 07.11.93 ~.e~. •. ~--• taw..er- Notary Publ , Btate~ of Texas My Commission expires: 7~t1-~-~ (SEAL) SENT BY: Thomas T. Wright Co~ 3-12-93 2:35PM 2083447550 CCITT Q3: it 5 cw~aaait n tv Z-3~lal-t8~1 Page 1 at ~ Pag®e P R~ CSL A t A parcel of land located in tha $E 1/4 of Section e, T.3N., R.1E., B.M., Heridian. Ada County, Idaho, and n+ora particularly described as fellovs: 9estnnin; at a brass cep markin= the southwest corner of said S! 1/4 of Section e; thence North 00'31'13' East t362.73 feet along thw Westerly boundary of said SE 114 of Section S to an iron pin on the Northerly right•af-way line of the Union Pacific Railroad, also said paint being the REAL POINT OF 9E0INNINO: thence continuing *+orth CO'31'12" East ~+50.C0 feet along sold Westerly boundary of the 5E 1/L of Section ® :c an iron pin: thence South 8x'29'39" ra9t 2~Z.~0 fees to an iron pin: hence South CO' 3' ' ^" ~~est =50 . _C s'aet - , an i .*on p in cn said Norther l y right-of-vey line cf -..".e '~nicn Fsctfi~ ?aiircaa; :fence North ?9's''~?" west ~-~.~- :eat sl©~g said NQrtheri;i right~of-way ::ne to the REAL rCi?~7 "~ ?c~1NNt;Jr =ARCEL 3: A parcvt of land lccateo i;~ the 5E ';4 of Section 8. T.3N.. R.1E., B.M., Meridian. Ada County, Idaho. and Tore carticttlar"ly described as follows: Beginning at a !:roes Cap rtarxing :hs Southwest Corner of said SE 1/4 of section g: thence North 00' 31 ' ~ 2" last ' 312.'3 feet a long the Westerly boundary of said SE ~ 14 of Section 8 to an iron pin. said taint 47eing the REAL PfliNT aF BSGINNING: thence Continuing North 04'31'x2" East 835.86 feet alon; said Westerly Boundary cf the SE 1;4 of Section @ t3 a brass tae marking the Northwest corner aP sa~td SE 1 /4 of Section 8: ;hence South 89'S4' 19" East 490.89 feet alon; the Northerly boundary of said S: +'4 cf Section 8 to an iron Fin: :!tents South 00'C5'41" 'aegt 1`.CC feet ;o an iron pin. said iron pin being a taint ~n turv~; thence Southwester 1 y along anon-tangent curve to the left 644. ~9 feet. said c;:r~•e hawing a Central angle of 89'34' 2'g" . a radius of 444.29 feet. `aneents of -:0.99 feet and a lon; chcrs of 625.97 `'get cear-^g South 45''8'a~" nest to an iron esn marking a point cf lean=ent: :hence South CO'3t " Z" Beet 38P. " :eet :o an ir;n pen: :fence North $9'29'99" Nest S~.C1 rent := t`e point =: '=egin:~ir.g ' SENT BY: Thom~i~ T. Wr 19ht C~ 3-12-93 2: 35PM : 2®?550 CCITT i33; q S 14At'iJ,pl'1' A '++L'1~ r ~~3~~1~~~-~i Past Z OP ~ Pad®a R D: ~ parcel ci :a-s i::a;e_ :r tr.a hE t:~ _~ Se::::- 2. T.9N.. P.fE. B.M.. !!eridian. Ada C.:;:n:i. ::a':=. a-: dare part:C:r:arly cescriaed as .rollovs: 8eginnir.g a. a ass c !e .!. .... ... . tr .+ .r ~ ~~ 0~ -;ar~:r Q SOi. ....~e^ Lr. .. ~. 8ai r 1~ ~ ~ 4 .• Settle^ e. sa== :rasa ca; :e:rg :he REAL PC:h'" :F E=311;!t1N3: tzenca Ncr::::=''~''•2' Eas: 12.9."= lea: al:rtg :re wee:arly ira3:+sery ::' aa:c ~'E 1/4 of Seoti:z 8 to an leer, pin marking. :he Ss:sthvest corner ." 7reasvre ':allay Business Center - Phase :. a subdivision, as filed for recce:: in the afflee of thf Ada Caur.:}' Reecraer. Boise. Idaho. :n 8oek d3 of Plate at pages t~;90 through 4792; thence South 89'3R''S° East 2558.30 last along the southerly boundary of said Treasure Valley 8usineas Center - Phase 1, to an iron pin on the westerly right-oC•way line ol" North Esgla Road. also said point being 70.00 feet iesterly of th• Easterly boundary of said NE 1/4 of SeCtien B: rr"° thence leaving said 5outherty boundary of Traacure Valley Suainass Center - Phase I South o~•08'45" vase +139.72 i`eet alon= said westerly right-of-vay line of North Eagle iioad to an ircn pin on the Southerly boundary of said NE 114 of Section 8; thence leaving said liesterly right-ci-way line of Morlh Eagle Read-North_ 89'54'19° wa^t 2+!43.2" fast along said 5_utherly Boundary of the NE t/4 of Section 8 to~tha paint cf beginning ARCEL E: A parcel of land located :n thQ Nw 1!b of Section 9. T.9N., R.1E.. B.M. Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. and more particularly daaeribed ss follows: 8eginning et a brass cap marking the Nori!•west Corner of said N1~1 1/4 of Section 9; thence South Ot'08'45° West 184.99 feet along the Westerly boundary of said Nw 114 of Section 9 to an aluminum cap: Chance South 99'35'07" East 25.00 feet to a pclnt: thence North 58'10'32° East 53.84 feet to an iron pin on the intarsat:tion of the Easterly right-of-+ray lin• of North Eagle Road and the Southerly right- ~l'-vay tins o!' q.S. Highway 30. also said point being the R>:At FOINT OF BEGINNING; thene• along the folleuing courses and distances atong the said Southerly right-ef-vay lino of U.5. Hlghway 30: North 68'10'32" East 161.93 feet to an aiutrinum cap; thence South 89'35'00" East 410.00 feet to an aluminum tap: thence North 00'23'Od" East 10.00 Ceet to an eluminum cap; thence Se~uth 89'35'04" East 2044.29 feet to an el-~minum cap on the Easterly boundary o!' said Na t14 of 5actlon 9; Chance leaving said Southerly right-of-way lino of U.S. Hlghway 30 South 00'48't4" west 2fi00,75 feet along said Easterly bouhdsr;~ oC said NE- 1J4 of Section 9 to a brass sap marking the 5euthesst corner of sold N1i 1/4 of Sactivn 9; thehee leavlhg said Easter!}' boundary of ;he Nw 1/4 cf Section 9 North 89'20'17" vast 2805.43 feet along the Southerly coundary cf said Nw 114 of Section 9 to an iron oin on said Easterly boundary of North Eagle Road. said Iron pin being 70.00 fee: Easterly ~f :he S~uthvest :sense .f sale tiN +!~ of Sactian 9; thanca leaving said Southerly boundary er the Nw '.:~ of Section 9 North 01'08'45" Eaat 2499.36 feet along said Eaeterty boundary ~£ lJ:rth Eagle Road to the point cf beginning 0 m ° _ i z 0 PS Form 3877, O~M 1988 FOR REGISTERED, INSURED, C.O.D., CERTIFIED RETURN RE r ~ a c mm ~. ? ~ W .,.. N .... ~-• ... O ~O OD ~ O~ t/i A a- c~ ,~ c to c ~~ ~ ~ ~y. .l 1 " ' ~ .. m O M m ~ ~ \ 1 •V ~ m• C ~ ~ ~ O• ~ ~ O ~ • ~ ~ , •' W m 3 ° ~ ~ rp ~ ~ ~ T ^ o m ~` ~ ~ _ \ ~ ,~• (fit ~ . om J \~~ ~m ~ ~ ~ ~~ l p ~ Py ~ ~ ~ V ' ~ ~ ~ a ~~~ rA m ~ ~ ~ . ~ C ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~- ~ N b °°' ~ m ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ O ~- m ~ l G m ~ ~ D Z a e ~ m m m ~~i ~ d e o~^a• ~~ A ~, ? ~~ ^ ^c g ~ oc~o~ e m ~ ~3 R m - o .v ~ (n N 00'~y~ l ~ S _ C. N p~ . ~' 2 7 W to a ~fDCO mS co (pp ( ~~. ~ O in ~ fY ~ _ _ m lC' Cj' ,y 'O O ' ' o p. ~, fA -. w 'TJ id O`~ ~ 3 _ _° _ z o . O S7 . G. H C 3 ~u .o a 0 C ~ • v c~ - ~• , ~ ~~ _ ip ~ < m m y ~ ~ ~ J.~ ..yy ~"1 ~ y o y (O'p C '~ f~ Q ~ ~~ m C A ~ ~C , ~ y h d (p W C ~ . o w ~ m .a , o . g ~ ~ ~ '0.m, g ~. ~ '-' o ~.c C) m b0 a~D ~ .: x p~ppC !/l ocim ~m S~c~i~7 ~ I °m ~ m 3 o ~^ g ~ ^ g i 1 o o.'° ° -p o~ ~ Q a i 0 ~ 3m p n ~O 0. ~ x+7 mmm p ~ ' oy °.~y ~~°: .e ~ o' mo coa O =~ m ~.5.~~' y ~ m `° _ 2 ~° ' fD m m = n aa` o n~ _ ~1 ~ " y ~ S. ~-'~ ~' m r. ` ~ - y . 3 i .e 00 mom, ~ ~ m ~ . _~ a m ~ .mi °o y'3 ~-i • T m ~ v Nat ~' m ~n x ~3 v ~ •~ • NAMES AND ADDRESSES WITHIN 300' RADIUS OF PROPOSED CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION Joe Dobaran and John and Arvella Dobaran 355 S. Cloverdale Road Boise, ID 83709 ?j~~- ®450 Gemtone, Inc. P.O. Box 2727 Boise, ID 83701 Terrace Lawn Memorial Gardens, Inc. 1200 N. Cloverdale Road Boise, ID 83704 Southern Idaho Corp. of Seventh-Day Adventists P.O. Box 4878 Boise, ID 83711 Carol Mayer Marshall 225 10th Avenue San Francisco, CA 94118 Elixir Industries 17809 S. Broadway . Gardena, CA 90248 Walter Herman and Eugene M. Kleiner P.O. Box 4003 Bellevue, WA 98009 200. rpt • NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., on May 11, 1993, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of GEMTONE, INC., for a preliminary plat of the Southwest ll4 of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, for 256 residential lots and 5 commercial lots with 19 common areas. The above property is generally located near the intersection of Eagle Road and Fairview Road, Meridian, Idaho. A more particular legal description is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Meridian and is available upon request. A copy of the Applciation is available upon request. Public comment is welcome and will be taken and heard. DATED this o~ day of April, 1993. ~~e1a~- 7- WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP CITY CLERK • NOTICE OF SEARING NOTICE IS BSREBY CIVE~1 pursuant to the t~rdinanoes of the City of Meridian and the laws of the State+ of Idaho, that the City Counoil og the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 Baet Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hoar of T z 30 o'olock p.m. , on June 15, 1993, for ths~ purpose of reviewing and con:~idering the Application of GEMTONB, YNC., for a preliminary plat of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 Bast, Boise, ~leric'lian, Ada County, Idaho, for 256 zeeidential lots and 5 vo~eroial lots with 19 oommon areas. The above property is generally looated near the inters®ction of $agle Road and pairview Road, Meridian, 2daho. A more particsular legal deeoription of the above property is on file in the Catty Clerk' g office at Meridian City Ball, 33 Bast Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hoyrs. A copy of the Application is available upon request. public comment is welcome and will b® taken and held. DAT$D this ~ day of Mays 1993. 5 wAY~$ s. RREY, cITY • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS WAYNES.FORREY,AICP,CItyClerk CITY OF MERIDIAI~T COUNCILMEN R A JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Worka Supt. ROBERTGIE3LER WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MAX YERRINGTON JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste water supt. KEN MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 ROBERT D. CORRIE NY BOWERS, Flre Chief s Chairmen Zoning & Planning BILL GORDON, Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 JIM JOHNSON GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 Centennial Coordinator GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and ~Zoni.ng Commission, may we have your answer by: ~,<;~ - . w TRANSMITTAL DATE: REQUEST : ~~~;~ir-~~ - ~ Lu~1 , _,~ ..~ BY • ~ ~6) r.0 ,~ e~ LOCATION OF PROPER~Y~ Oft RO'I~C `" 4~ ~:~ ~~ .. ~~ ~~ ~~ HEARINS. b ., /~ /~ 3 ~~ ~~~'s. 7: JIM JOHNSON, P1Z ~§ MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z t,~: , JIM SHEARER, P/Z ~ .,;~; CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z `~>.~t~~: TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C BOB GIESLER, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT ~ ~~ f .x ... V a ~ ~~ ..~. MERIBTAN. Sii]OL DISTRICT MERIDIAN PE'iST OFFICE (PREL.& FINAL PLAT) COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT r'~~ AAA _.PLANN I NG ASSOCIATION ~~_~E1TRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO. (PREL. 8 FINAL PLAT) U. S. WEST (PREL. 8 FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PREL. 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION .(PREL. & FINAL PLAT) WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER CITY ATTORNEY CITY FILES OTHER: GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER • • iV 'N\ _~, RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INS. 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 April 16, 1993 Mr. Wayne Forrey Director of Planning City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Street Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Proposed Crossroads Subdivision Dear Mr. Forrey: 208/322-8992 ^ Fax 208/378-0329 On behalf of J. Ramon Yorgason of Capital Development Corporation, we are requesting approval for the proposed Crossroads Subdivision preliminary plat. This property is located within 154.50 acres at the southeast corner of N. Eagle Road and U.S. Highway 30 (Fairview Avenue). The proposed subdivision contains five (5) commercial lots and 256 single-family residential lots. The proposed Crossroads Subdivision will contain landscaping adjacent to N. Eagle Road and U.S. Highway 30 (Fairview Avenue) and landscaped entrance islands. The streets are proposed as public streets and will be constructed to ACRD standards. New sanitary sewer and water mains will be extended to serve this development. The present land use is agricultural and the farmer who farms this property is fully informed of the proposed change in land use. Thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~..a- a ~G Brent A. Watkins Assistant Project Coordinator BAW/bh/189.Itr HUB OF TRBASURE 6'AL~; "~- EY OFFICIALS WAY"~ S. FORRaY,AICP, City Clerk JANICEGAS5,Treasurer A Good Place to Live CITY BRUCE 0 ST ®F ME COUNCILMEN . UART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON JR Attor RIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA , ., ney JOHN SHAWCROFT, waste water supt 33 EAST IDAHO ROBERT GIESLER . KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chiet BILL GORDON, Police Chlet MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE GARY SMITH, P.E., Clty Engineer Phone (208) 888-4433 Chairman Zoning & Planning FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON GRANT P. KINGSFORD Centan^lal Coordinator Mayor PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN the To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered Meridian Plannin and Zoning Commission, may we have your answer b : AAI~,.. G~ icra~ Y TRANSMITTAL DATE : ~'Mr°Y ~~ REQUEST : ~ ~~ ~~° i~ Ut ~ ~t~ m :4 _ HEARING DAT _. ~ . _ . r . A+s ~ .. ~~"N:~+ ~. ~ ~ 9 ~T. ,~i ~ t~iwr a , ~(, c~0 rrvr~w lsd. : ~ ~~,~ MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN PAST OFFICE (PREL.& FINAL PLAT) AITA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADAf.PLANNING ASSOCIATION =CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAP~ inn^R. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO. (PREL. 8 FINAL PLAT) U. S. WEST (PREL. & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PREL. & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION. (PREL. & FINAL PLAT) WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER CITY ATTORNEY CITY FILES OTHER: JIM JOHNSON, p/Z MOE ALIDJANI, p/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, p/Z GRANT KIPiGSFORD, FiAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C BOB GIESLER, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT GARY SMITH, P. E. ENGINEER b!r •• • • L MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1~, 1993 PAGE 6 Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else to testify? No response. I will close the public hearing. The Motion was made by Corrie and .seconded by Yet^rington to approve of the preliminary plat far School~Plaaa Subdivision: Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #9: PUBLIC HEARING: PRELIMINARY PLAT FDR CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION: 256 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, 5 COMMERCIAL LOTS AND 19 COMMON AREAS: Kingsford: I will open the public hearing and invite the owner ar a representative to speak first. Don Hubble, Hubble Engineering, 9550 Bethel Court, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Hubble: Presented copy of proposed subdivision plat to Council. The northerly boundary is Fairview Avenue, the westerly boundary is Eagle Road and the entire site consists of about 164 acres. The residential portion of that site is approximately 76 acres. We are proposing a subdivision consisting of 256 single family •residential lots, which would be a net density of about 3.3 lots peT^ acre. This also includes some commercial lots along the frontage of those major roadways. Tonight we are requesting approval far a subdivision plat in a PD-Genet^aI Zone. We have access into the property by three public streets, one of them off of Fairview Avenue and~two of them off of Eagle Road. (Explained sewer and water availability - see tape) Drainage will be retained on site. In this planned development the concept of this is to provide those long linear open spaces colored in green at the rear of the lots. We've proposed a revision~to the street layout slightly. tExplained - see tape) Homes to be a minimum of 1300 square feet. The price is going to be from #100,000.00 to 'b150,000.00. The developer is here tonight also. I'd be happy to answer any questions you may hawe. Discussion between Hubble and Council Mewbers - see tape. Crookston: Da you plan any kind of barriers between your residential lots and adjacent commercial or ind~-strial uses? Hubble: Let me refer that to Mr. Yorgason. MERIDIAfU CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1~, 1993 PAGE 7 Kingsford: I think when I visited with Mr. Wright he's going to have to screen those from the subdivision, our Ordinance would r^equire him to screen those. Anyone else? Ramon Yorgason, J~-~J Fifeshire Place, was sworn by the attorney. Yorgason: To address the question of screening between the residential and commercial. Number one, by couenant we will have in the commercial area it will be light com®ercial and there will be screening on their side as well as we'll be putting a fence on our side. As the commercial goes in there will be shrubbery that will go between that as well. Kingsford: Any questions for Mr. Yorgason? The school has indicated that we need a school in that area. Yorgason: .We've had many discussions with the Schools and the Meridian City Staff. As we have looked at various locations, typically if an entire square mile is ga~ing to be developed into a residential area it can just about accam®adate one school. In this particular square mile area there will be large areas that will not have residential and so if they put a school in this particular square mile area then there would not be enough students to fill up a school there and either we'd have to bus students into that squat^e mile or if gee didn't have one there they would be bused out of that particular square mile. In looking at the other sites north of here where there are other schools or not other schools, it was felt by the people that we discussed with that it would probably be more appropi^i ate to have one just north of this because of the fact that it would encompass almost entire residential areas where this would have a much smaller residential configure. Kingsford: I think there really needs to be some planning done there from the standpoint that - Fairview being what it is for traffic, as well as Eagle Raad, and the district's policy is not busing students unless it's a mile. Your talking about creating a subdivision that if the students go across Fairview to school that's going to be a real hazard for those children to go across. Wayne Forney: After Mr. Yorgason and I ®et last week to discuss that very issue with this project, I met with the school district and they've identified the school site to serve this particular subdivision, not on the north side of Fairview but a school site MERIDIAN CITY CDUNCIL JUNE 15, 1993 RAGE 8 they just acquit^ed or at least have an option on, south and east of this site about a mile and a quarte-^ from Crossroads. This subdivision would be at the extreme northwest of that school site service area. Yorgason: We are on record as supporting an impact fee for the schools. We think that that's something that needs to be addressed and we think it needs to be addressed in a rapid fashion and as developers we are very supportive of that. Kingsford: Again, before final platting I'd like for you to consider a passible outlet into the south and east that might accommodate those children. Yorgason: We will certainly do that. Carrie: On the south side, what length is it between the south edge of your pt^operty and the railroad tracks? Yorgason: Around 3~1Q1' . Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Tom Wright, 141 W. Idaho, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Wright: It's difficult to be to precise tonight Mr. Crookston as to exactly how it's going to be screened. Our commitment to this community and to Mr.' Yorgason is that we will put covenants against all the property surrounding him that will do among other things restrict height, color,~hours of operation, landscaping separations, etc.. We have discussed three variations of separation per Say between residential and commercial, one would be fencing, one would be landscaping and one would be berming. I don't know tonight precisely in what combination, what percentage proportion of those we will use but I will assure this Council and this community that there will be sepal^ation between the t^esidential and commercial but we have to do that in tandem with Mr. Yorgason. Crookston: I know that in these other situations that this has arisen then^e is quite of bit of concern about light coming in from the commercial and sound. Are those issues going to be addressed in your covenants? • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 1443 PAGE 9 Wright: Yes they wil] be. Discussion about minimum square footages - see tape. Corrie: Expressed concerns about 30~' strip. Discussion on that - see tape. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? No response. I will close the public hearing. The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Tolsma to approve the preliminary plat fo'r^ Crossroads Subdivision conditioned upon meeting all staff and agency comments.' Motion Carried: All Vea: ITEM #10: PUBLIC HEARING: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CARNELIAN SUBDIVISION: TWA LOTS ZONED R-4: Kingsford: I will open the public hearing at this time and invite the owner or a representative to speak first. Keith Loveless, Loveless Engineering, 333 Grace Street, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Loveless: This is a two lot subdivision utilizing a common driveway off of a new street being built in Applegate No. 1 Subdivision until the extension south of NW 5th Street, there was no access to this lot, it was a landlocked parcel of ground. We are requesting a two lot subdivision with a reduced ft^ontage but with adequate building site as~ delineated on the plat with the set backs predetermined by the plat. Any questions? Corrie: Gn this, it Shows a 4~' common ingress - egress but it's only twenty feet and it goes c~[-' inta the other lat, is that correct? Loveless: Yes. Corrie: So you've got a 20' driveway. Loveless: Yes. That allows basically two way traffic in and out. It .would be a common maintained driveway between the two. Kingsford: Private lane? •. t~ERIdiAh! PLANNING AhJd ZONING I*tA`( 11, 199?, PAGE 19 .Iohnson: We'11 take a five minute break before continuing. iBREAK) "Johnson: Meeting called back to order. ITEM # 1 1 : PURL I C HEARING : REf~UE5T FOR FrREL I MI NAR`( PLAT KNOLlN AS CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION CONTAINING SSf~ RESIDENTIAL LOTS, 5 COMMERCIAL LOTS AND COMMON AREAS WITHIN THE TREASURE VALLEY PLANNED UNIT DEVELDPMENT BV GEMTONE, INC.: .Iohnson: I will open the public hearing, is there a r^epresentative present? Lyon Hubble, Hubble Engineering, 9550 Bethel Grt., Boise, wa, sworn by the at"tot^ney. Hubble: We are here tonight to ask your consideration for a preliminary plat on a piece of property located at the intersection of Eagle Road and Fairview. This is the so~_rtheast corner of that intersection. iMap presented and e~:plained - see tape? The entire parcel is about lfa0 acres. This property i=_• currently zoned PDG, Planned Development General and what we're asking tonight is appro.+al of preliminary plat in a mixed use zone, so we've got the single family residential for abo+.:t half of the site and then 5 commercia] lots. It will take access fro: at least three locations. One will be from Fairview and +.wo off of Eagle Road. All of these streets will be public streets, owned and maintained by Ada County Highway District. All three entrances will have a minimum of two lanes out and probably twc 3anes in. Ther^e will be"divided entries with landscaped islands. Meeting with the staff of Ada County Highway District, they brought up a A~~estion about the connection of Pine and Emerald. That's in the long term plan and they would like to make pro+~+isions for. that connection. So their condition is if the Highway District will perform a traffic study to dete•rr~ine the :naste•r^ plan and the overall needs of that connection. Upon the completion of tYaat stud y, they wi 11 have a co}.epl a of options on what their req'aesting this developer to do. The goal is to provide that Collector Stt^eet ot^ larger, perhaps an arterial street connection across the southerly boundary of this property. Mr, Sale is here tonight and we are going to work with the staff of 'the Highway District in tJ-ie completion of that traffic st ~tdy and to provide whate~.~er access and right of way is going to be r~ 'u t*1ER I D I AN PLAhI~S I ~+lG AfVD ZOt~ I h!G l~IAY 11, 1493 p+AGE 20 r~ u r^eg4-ired for the pro.jec•t. The basic concept here is to provide a 1 of of open space. There wi 11 be open space, hopeful 1 y, at the r^eC-r of every lot. We had designed the entries so that there would be same open space close to the entr^ance streets tshown art map and explained} . The average 1 at si ae i s over 8, ~t~tfd squar"e feet b-.-t the lot dimensions proposed would be to have a minimur~ width of 7D feet. We gat a comment her^e f1^om Nlr. For^rey saying that it wo-.rld be nice to design these as R-4 lots which wo~ild mean that we need a minim-,-m width o{ 8~ feet, but we'd 1 ike yo~-r•• consideration based on the open spaces provided and based on the mixed use plan, here to consider this with lot widths of down tc a minim-.rm of 7Q1 feet. Water and sewer services are on Eagle Road and we will e:•:tend the~t through .the project. We've had a r^eq~-est to provide. access to the easterly property. Have disc~-ssed with that des+•eloper extending roadway to provide that access. Al sa the Highway Di str°ict wo>.-1 d 1 i ke to have at i east one of these streets stubbed to the sa~atherly bo~rndary whict-~ mould be some day connected to that PinelEmerald carer-ector. Tl--at conc3~rdes our presentation and I'd be happy to answer any gUe~'t 1 ans. Johnson: Thank you. Anyone e3 se? Larry* Sale, AC!-IB, 318 E. 37th Street, Hoise, was savor^n by the att arney+. Sale: We apologize for not getting our comments to you earlier. This is a rather comprehensive project and it took •as a day or^ two to look at it. First we'd lake to compliment the designer an the interior layo}-t of the p:^oject. We feel it's well done and pr"oxides a good var^iety of lots. Handed out to Commission copies of the Functional Street Classification Map for Ada County. If you'll notice the map designates a connector generally along the mid section line, which is the south proper^t y1 line of this project which would essentially be an extension of Emerald from the east and Pine from the City of Meridian. If we construe that alignment to run along the mid section line then at least part of the right of waya would need to come out of this property. There are essentially three options for the preservation of thi, corridor^ and they are: reserve half the right of way 45 fe?t from this project and rise it to constr!-ct half of that fut+_-re t^oadway b~hich the developer could ttse as one access to Eagle Road replacing one of the two c~-rrenty pr^oposed; second option is the same essentially as the first one, we wa+:Id acquire the right of • MER I D I Anl PLAhIhJ i:~dG AAlD ZON i!`1G ~IAY L 1, L99~ WAGE ~1 way at this time but that we worlld not melt any part of the •:^oadway and the developer would continue to use essentially the accesses that he s`rows coming out to Eagle Road; the third option is we can ,j~rst shut our eyes and hope it goes away and wait fir the property next to it to come in and then answer the question. b!e opted not to do tt'eat. In discussions with the applicant, the staff has determined that this is a major issue which should be :^esolved in the preparation of tt-re traffic impact study expanded to study the corridor for Eder^ald and or Frine, whatever we vaill call it to determine whether the alignment should be continuous from the area of Met^idian to Boise and what alignment that lhoulC follow. The discussions we've had have resulted in the following: The Highway District will f:and a tt^affic impact study that wi 1 1 adds^ess the gtaest i on of the alignment and status of this major facility. The developer will pay a po:^tiorr of the cost of that study, which will examine the affects of his project on the arterial system, that's a standard regrlireczer.t for^ any pro,j ect of this size. Upon completion of that stud}- we may have additional requirements to impose based on those Findings. Assarming that the alignment of Emerald; Pine is relatively close to the soF~th boundary of the project, we wo-11d recommend to move his sa~tthea^n entrance to Eagle a short distance north, arod he has ag:^eed. We then had asked them to stub a street to the east property line somewhere in the nos^thez^n half of the property, that is a tentative condition pending some discussions with a church which ovans the property to the east. They have previousl;~ indicated that they want to develop their entire pt^opertj themselves for church related uses and they don't want tl-,e additional street access. I think Mr. Hubble indicated that there would be a street extension near the southeast corner of the property, I don't thinEc we' 12 da that, we'll retain that uldesac in the corridrr. The development that he spoke of coming from the east is one very similar to the ^ne•you approved earlier tonight. It's about 3te10 feet wide and a ha3f a mile deep. I think we will require it to stub a street out to the south and connect with Emerald rather than running a street into this project. Then we'd asked the developer to comply with any 7^eq~rirements of Idaho Tr^ansportation Department. I'd be happy to ansa,+er any q~-estians. Ro+.rntr^ee: I hear^d the apt ions yon: talked about far corridor r.r:^ese:^vatirsn but was there. any erne preference with your^ discussions with the developer? `~tER I D I AN Pt_ANN I P1G AND ZCIN I NG 4ulA't 1 1, 14 9 3 f''AGE ^L Sale: Plot at tt-ais ti^~e. We're going- to let the outcome of the traffic study deter^mine that. In appear^s there's a dwelling directly kind of just south of the mid section Sine an the west side of Eagle Road, which would appear^ to Limit the location of that intersection. At a s!ipe•r•ficial level, it appears that at least of the locations that has to be considered is r^ight on the mid-section line which vro!tId affect the southwest point of this project . Ro!sn+.ree: Which wo!ild have a fair aaount of impact on the Jayaut of the subdivision. Sale: It could. tF°arther explanation - see tape) Crookston: Ass!iming that Pine and E:~erald connect samewher^e along there, what restrictions a:^e you going to has°e to access to that. from this subdivision, and along with that what kind of bar^ri er i s preferable? Sale. Yo+_ir correct we would not allow direct lot access to the Facility at Least not from the residential grope:^t y, we would -req!tir^e one p!tblic street access from this project t:, the fac;lit}°. We world enco!trage the constr^uction of a berm in the •r^esidential properties and that facility. If businesses locate along it we will confine accesses as much as possible to p!rblic street intersections. There may be some private accesses allowed b!rt not on a ver^y freg!rent basis. Crookston: World it be wise to have a str^eet access onto Pine fr^om the subdivision? Sale: ble believe sa, it would provide a good connection to the Estate Highway System at Eagle Road and good east west circ!rlat i on. Clerk Forrey:- Sometimes in the past the Highway District has approached differ^en+. Commissions when a traffic study has been involved and asked to delay a decision pending an ortcome of the tr^affic st!rdy. Is the thinking of the Highway District to ask for a delay or^ do yo!t think that if the Commission chooses to approve it co!,Id move forwar^d subject to the Findings of the St Lady. Sale: It's any recommendation that the commission can :Hove for^ward. I think given the information that yo!r have, the changes that ~aigtit come aholit be~weer, this pr••eliminar^y and a final pl~~t wc~_tld he ins_g^ifica,r,t er::,~_igh th~-t yo!r c~orld not r^eA!rire an additona, hearing. `YlER I D IAhi p'LA!'dh! I!'~!G Ah1Lti ZOhf IhlG p'AGE c^3 ~1e1^k Farrey: What is the timing on the• traffic study? Sale: P:~obably 3Q9-45 days to prepare, a couplz o{ weeks to 'r^eview and refine. Croakstarr: How do your analyse a tt^affic st~.~dy far a rand that' s non eraistent? Sale: That's called planning. Johnson: Thank yotr. Anyone else to testify? Crookston: b~hat's the reason for the change from the commer^c, al indcrstt^ial to t!-ie residential? Tam Wright, 1415 W. Idaho, Boise, was sworn 5y the attorney. bJright: I'm part owner of GemTone, the owner of the property. The answer to Air. Crookston's question. is I would say st'r^ictl}' market demand. Crookston: What kind of eammer^cial are ya~.r going to ender~d~or. that's not going to interfere with residential laving? iJright: We're going to covenant as to color, !:eight, types, landscaping, lighting,, hours of ope~r^at i on, etc. , in order t n protect and ir: essence enhance the residential. We won't allow major heavy ind~~str^ial use. I wo+.rld call it light commercial ar.d office type uses. Crookston: What kind of landscaping barriers do you propose fi^om the commer^cial ab~rtt ing the residential? '.•dright: :Je had talked about a number of different scenarios, fencing, bey^ming, trees, some combination possibly of all three. °.-!epFer: Gle've recently had projects wl-rere there's been ca.;r^cercial and z^esidential barderir:g the same property line and typicall~r~ yoDr get the homeowner^s in there fi:^st and then your try to come in wit!': a commer^cial pra.,~ect and we end ~.rp v~aith ~wi3 mad homeo~,rne•rs here that want to see their rights pr•atected. t-!.ave you given any ccr,sideration of t~:king same of those common areas rand put}ing thew along the border line bet.~e en the ~^esident ia' znd commez^cal area _~s a b~rffer~ lF1ER I D I AN PLANNING AND ZDh! I NG p'AGE ~:4 Wright: Those, I don't think would have an application frankly as a buffer because thane are meant to be running trails and areas of pedestrian t:^affic. We're thinking more of some type of berm, a fence, coatbination tree situation to isolate that commercial from the residential. Johnson: Thank yo~t. Anyone else? No response. I will close the p~tbl is hear^ing. The Motion was made by Shearer to ~hawe the attorney Prepare Findings of Fact and Concl~.tsions of Law. Crookston: What kind of lots are you going to p~.tt in there? Wright: We are asking for lots that are going to be 9,tI-'~Dfd square feet with a minimum width of 7~1 feet. This is currently zoned as PDG. . 4Discttssion - see tape) Shearer: I will withdraaa the motion. The Motion was then made by Roatntree and seconded by Shearer that the Planning and Zoning Commission pass on a favorable Y^ecotamendation to the City Council on this application with the condition t!-tat some ofi .the gt.test i ons raised t oni g:-~t be answered. tyiot i on Carried: Al 3 Yea c ITEM #3O: PUBLIC HEARING: REEIUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOCATED AT 41~ E. BROADWAY, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE FOR THE NORTHWEST LINEMAAJ COLLEGE HY SHANE PORTER: Johnson: I will now open the patblic hear~ing. Is there a :^epresentative? A1r.. Aar^on Howell, lE,~-8 Sunrise Rim, Boise, was savor^n by the ,attorney. Howell: We are .j~.,st r^eq~testing a conditional ~.tse permit for a ~,rocat i onal cal I ege 1 ocat ed at the stat ed adds^es s. Ther^e was a question on the sheet that >.+e had, whether oa^ not t;-Fe Est i I it poles ;~~i'_3 be per:t~rr.ent ar temporary mind t!-:ey are temporary. T.•hey are set and removed by each cla1=, its th?}~ come in. •. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1~, 1993 RAGE 6 Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else to will close the public hearing. testify? No response. I The Motion was made by Carrie and seconded by Yet^rington to approve of the preliminary plat for School-Plaaa Subdivision: Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #9: PUBLIC HEARING: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CROSSROADS SUHDIUISION: X56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, 5 COMMERCIAL LOTS AND 19 COMMON AREAS: Kingsford: I will open the public hearing and invite the owner ar a representative to speak first. Don Hubble, Hubble Engineering, 9551 Bethel Court, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Hubble: Presented copy of proposed subdivision plat to Council. The northerly boundary is Fairview Avenue, the westerly boundary is Eagle Road and the entire site consists of about 164 acres. The residential portion of that site is approximately 76 acres. We are proposing a subdivision consisting of ~5b single family residential lots, which would be a net density of about 3.3 lots per acre. This also includes same commercial lots along the frontage of those major roadways. Tonight we are requesting approval for a subdivision plat in a PD-General Zone. We have access into the property by three public streets, one of them off of Fairview Avenue and-two of them off of Eagle Road. tExplained sewer and water availability - see tape) Drainage will be retained an site. In this planned development the concept of this is to provide those long linear open spaces colored in green at the rear of the lots. We've proposed a revision 'to the street layout slightly. tExplained - see tape) Homes to be a minimum of 13GG square feet. The price is going to be from ~10dtt,QJQ10.Odt1 to ~15~I,QIQt0.0~. The developer is here tonight also. I'd be happy tai answer any questions you may have. Discussion between Hubble and Council Meabers - see tape. Crookston: Do you plan any kind of barriers between your ti^esidential lots and adjacent commercial or industrial uses? Hubble: Let me refer that to Mr. Yorgason. ~ ~ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE Lv, 1993 PAGE 7 Kingsford: I think when I visited with Mr. Wright he's going to have to screen those from the subdivision, our Ordinance would require .him to screen those. Anyone else? Ramon Yorgason, 5~i1~15 Fifeshire place, was sworn by the attorney. Yorgason: Ta address the question of screening between the residential and commercial. Number one, by covenant we will have in the commercial area it will be light commercial and there will be screening on their side as well as we'll be putting a fence on our side. As the commercial goes in there will be shrubbery that will go between that as well. Kingsford: Any questions for Mr. Yof^gason? The school has indicated that we need a school in that area. Yorgason: .We've had many discussions with the Schools and the Meridian City Staff.. As we have looked at various locations, typically if an entire square mile- is going to be developed into a residential area it can just about accommodate one school. In this particular square Wile area there will be large areas that will not have residential and so if they put a school in this particular square mile area then there would not be enough students to fill up a school there and either we'd have to bus students into that square mile or if we didn't have one there they would be bused out of that particular square mile. In looking at the other sites north of here where there are other schools or not other schools, it was felt by the people that we discussed with that it~would probably be more appropriate to have one .just north of this because of the fact that it would encompass almost entire residential areas where this would have a much smaller residential configure. Kingsford: I think there really needs to be same planning done there from the standpoint that - Fairview being what it is for traffic, as well as Eagle Road, and the district's policy is not busing students unless it's a mile. Your talking about creating a subdivision that if the students go across Fairview to school that's going to be a real ha~ai^d for those children to ga across. Wayne Forney: After Mr. Yorgason and I met last week to discuss that very issue with this project, I met with the school district and they've identified the school site to serve this particular subdivision, not on the north side of Fairview but a school site ~ ~ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE lv, 1993 GAGE 9 they .,just acquired or at 1 east have an option on, south and east of this site about a mile and a quarter from Crossroads. This subdivision would be at the extreme northwest of that school site service area. Yorgason: We are on record as supporting an impact fee for the schools. We think that that's something that needs to be addressed and we think it needs to be addressed in a rapid fashion and as developers we are very supportive of that. Kingsford: Again, before final platting I'd like for you to consider a possible outlet into the south and east that might accommodate those children. Yorgason: We will certainly do that. Corrie: On the south side, what length is it between the south edge of your property and the railroad tracks? Yorgason: Around 300'. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? Tam Wright, 141E W. Idaho, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Wright: It's difficult to be to precise tonight Mr. Crookston as to exactly how it's going to be screened. Our commitment to this community and to Mr.~.Yorgason is that we will put covenants against all the property surrounding him that will do among other things restrict height, color,~hours of operation, landscaping separations, etc.. We have discussed three variations of separation per say between residential and commercial, one would be fencing, one would be landscaping and one would be berming. I don't know tonight precisely in what combination, what percentage proportion of those we will use .but I will assure this Council and this community that there will be separation between the t^esidential and commercial but we have to do that in tandem with Mr. Yorgason. Crookston: I know that in these other situations that this has arisen there is quite of bit of concern about light coming in from the, commercial and sound. Are those issues going to be addressed in your covenants? • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 1993 1yAGE 9 Wright : Yes tl-~ey wi 1 I be. Discussion about minimum square footages - see tape. Corrie: Expressed concerns about 3Gtd' strip. Discussion on that - see tape. Kingsford: Thank you. Anyone else? No response. I will close the public hearing. The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Tolsma to approve the preliminary plat fo•r Crossroads Subdivision conditioned upon meeting all staff and agency comments.' Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #10: PUBLIC HEARING: PRELIMINARY PLAT FDR CARNELIAN SUBDIVISION: TWO LOTS ZONED R-4: Kingsford: I will open the public hearing at this time and invite the owner or a representative to speak first. Keith Loveless, Loveless-Engineering, 3331 Grace Street, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Loveless: This is a two lot subdivision utilising a common driveway off of a new street being built in Applegate No. 1 Subdivision until the extension south of NW 5th Street, there was no access to this lot, it was a landlocked parcel of ground. We are requesting a two lot subdivision with a reduced frontage but with adequate building site as~ delineated on the plat with the set backs predetermined by the plat. Any questions? Corrie: Dn this, it shows a 4D' common ingress - egress but it's only twenty feet and it goes 2~t1' into the other lot, is that correct? Loveless: Yes. Corrie: So you've got a 2Q1' driveway. Loveless: Yes. That allows basically two way traffic in and out. It .would be a Gammon maintained driveway between the two. Kingsford: Private lane? 10-11-1995 04~46PM FROM Idaho Biz Reuiew TO 8874813 P.01 • b ~ 9 ~1'he T ~ 9 ' f ~ ' • FA,~C ' ~ C~~TE~ e Oct. 1 ~ , 1995 SI~EE'T i d ~. ~FO: ' ;Will Berg, City clerk ~ , ~ ~ i Phone: ( ~ ) 887-4813 Steve Anderson F~'om: ~ The ~Id~ho Business Review Lora#e~ at: 4301 Franklin Rd. M ~; aid toi. P.O. Box 8866, Bose, ID 83707 { P1~or~e: (208) X36-37~ FAX: (20~) 336-5534 M~es~age: ! t~nx ~, ~ 8~ ~ ,~ ~s : ~ 'TJM W (~ ~ 6 (-fT 5~~"S Zhu L-`Y t-~~vt~ t' ~ ~ 20~ ~ ~ ~ ...:- pow ~ t ~ ' ~ ~ ~ f ~~ i i ~ i ~ I ~ ~ i i I ~ ~ ' ~ i '. • i f .; 4 ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ , i I ' • is 6j 1 3 ; 1, chi 21da6to bus~ne,~s assent SCnce 1384.E ~ €; OCT 11 '95 16 53 2083363768 PAGE.01 10-11-1995 04~46PM FROM Idaho Biz F2evfew TO 8874813 P.02 ~ .ti t ~ • • • • • •• - ._~ ~ NOR7M EAGLE ROAD N ~"~ I r.~ _ A _7 i ~ 1 $ : ~ ~~ 0800, ~ ~~ ~ ~ • I ~ N Z .~ ~: r f .• O~ R k ~ ! ~ ~O ~ I ~: ,,Ow~ .. r~Y/`~~ \/•_ 3: ~. m: ~; a z Q O ~ ~ ~s _ ~ I s O ~ ~ Z ~s rn • ~.rz m ~ ~.;' ~ ~ . ~. ~ i d ~ I ~ ~: _, m .•s. B~ m A ~~/ a` ~ ni Z '~_ Qy V y( ti i ~ i ~. ' m F ~ ' ~ _ ~~ ' ~~ ` ~ m fR I - $ m°_ 6Q~ II' ` II .~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ - ~~ . _.._ ~ i~ I ... 1 • r ' ~ ~ ~ m 9 3 ~ m ~ sxA ~ ~~ ~ ~~ I I ~ ; , n ~ ~~igp~pQ~Q 4 w m x ~ ~ ~ i3~1325 ~ m s -- ~ - ~ r .. ~I ,. ~ i .~ I~ ~~ a i OCT 11 '95 16 54 2083363?68 ~0 @0. ~ ~~ eae~.~- i 1 TOTAL P.02 PAGE.02 ' vDr~wi.~ r..uc .... _ . 1• NORTFI FJ1OLE ROAD I ---.. _. ~ ~_ ... ... .. _. . »... .~._...r_ • r A ~ 61 I "~ ~ $ ~ ~i ~ ~ B~ D 0~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ N • Z ~ ~. .. ,~ ., ,~: ~ ~ .,: ~ { a oo I .!` ~ x .1%,; ~ •" / m ~ A ~~ ~~ •/ a': I ~, _ ~~ • ~~ ~ J ~ `_" ~ ' ;. ~ ~ {. ~ i m ~ a°` ~ fr ~ ' i ~_ ~ c- I I ~ _ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ; ~~ ~ ~ ~ :~ -- ~ ... ., ._ ;~ ' j --_ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~-~-] I ~: I ~ ~ ~ ~ •- i ~ a ~ ~~ ~ j - r, ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ e ~~ }: C/f' I ' m` ~~ ~ I D' ~ _ T ~ z ~~ ~ ~ ~ _ y -~. R° ~ I ~ `~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ;• • 3. TOTAL P.02 OCT 11 '95 1654 2083363768 PAGE.02 • ~crr~sz3 r. ni I The Td a ~- , Oc't. 1 ]., 1995 ~'o: r--- P~one F1'o~,1 . ~: The ~Id LOCate Maii tt P1aor~e: (208) Mies age: ter, • ~ t~ ~ ~. i 1 i i• I • ~' i ' ~ CO~TE~ ~Review~ SI-~EE'~' :; Will Berg, city .clerk 887-4813 ~ ~ ' Steve Anderson rho Business Review i et: 430) Franklin Rd. ~; . P.O.6ox 8866, Bose, ID 83707 ' 336-373 FAX: (20~) 336-5534 i .. ;! z~M w roc sc-~-~ s~-~s T~ c~Y ~ ; 5 ~ 20~IU t (~L ~ -- po1~ l' 1 ty ' 9 t •I r ^ ~!`- .; ~ 1 S j i i ~ ' +.. ~ ! ~ ~ r ~ ! ~ • ' i 1 ' i • ~ ~ j 1 i P I 1 (a~ t ~ c,~i }Id~h~o ~~it~ss ~ since 1984-! 4' 1 OCT 11 '95 1653 2083363766 PAGE.01 Meridian City Council September 19, 1995 Page 9 other questions Council? Anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony on this issue, preliminary plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 & 6? Seeing none I will close that public hearing. What is the Council's pleasure with the preliminary plat? Tolsma: The way I understand it then we. are making the preliminary plat for everything except Lot 8 and Block 10 or Block 5, Block 10. Ingsford: I think you are making the preliminary plat for the entire parcel with 2 lots that will have to be re-platted. Morrow: I think my motion in order to get that accomplished would be that I would move. Kingsford: Well, we haven't yet annexed it so I think we are probably a little in advance of ourself. Morrow. What I was trying to explain to Ron is that if I were doing the motion I would move to approve the preliminary plat as it is designed and then subject to the conditions of the conditional use for the two lots and have a time frame and a requirement of a new plat for each lot. Kingsford: I think you need to table the preliminary plat until the next meeting so you can act on the annexation first. Morrow: So moved Cowie: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob to table the preliminary plat for the Lake at Cheny Lane No. 5 & 6 until the next meeting so the property may be annexed, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #9: TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: RAMON YORGASON: REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF WELL DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION: - ~- Kingsford: Did you do any research on that Gary with regard to where were we at with the development and with the pressurized irrigation ordinance and so forth. I think that was part of the issue last time. 4 Meridian City Council September 19, 1995 Page 10 Smith: I didn't Mayor. Kingsford: Council have other questions or comments with regard to that request? Morrow: We haven't basically answered our questions from last time have we? Kingsford: So far as I know we haven't. I was out of town, I don't know what may have been passed onto you folks but I have not heard anything. Morrow: Well, I guess from my perspective, waiting for that information that the appropriate thing to do is to table until October 3rd so we can get that information here and then make a decision. Because was there not some question about the procedure under which the fees had been paid and the status of cross connections and de-hooks and the system in general and all those other issues? Kingsford: I believe that is correct. Morrow: Okay, so I would move that we table until October 3rd pending arrival of information from staff. Yerrington: Second Ingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to table the well development fee request for Crossroad Subdivision until the October 3rd meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Tolsma: Gary, is there a possibility that we could work with this subdivision on the same master connection we have been using before if that was a problem with some of the people on the cross-connections. That if we could guarantee them the water early and late by a master connection from the City. Smith: We could certainly look at that if it is, the problem is dis-connecting the residents from their existing connection. Tolsma: Then we could probably use part of the reimbursement fees probably for making a master connection to this thing to guarantee them water. Smith: Say that again Councilman? Tolsma: Well I was going to say we could use part of this reimbursement fee if that was S• k ~ • Meridian City Council September 19, 1995 Page 11 the issue and use part of the reimbursement fees to put the meter in for the master connection and the valuing we have to have. Smith: You mean deduct that amount from the reimbursement. Tolsma: I think that was the major concern of some of those people out there is they wouldn't have water in the spring or in the fall. Smith: Right Tolsma: But, if we had a master connection in there I think we could probably get rid of the other connections. I visited a couple people out there, and that was their prime concern was they didn't have any water in the spring or late fall and they would rather keep on the city water for that effect. But if they had a master connection which I had told them we had done other places that the City pushed the water in there a month early and a month late and the bill went right to Nampa Meridian Irrigation. (Inaudible) Smith: If Nampa Meridian Irrigation is maintaining the system. Tolsma: And they said they wouldn't have a problem doing that, other than that they would rather stay on the City water rather than going to a pressurized irrigation system. Smith: Well, there is two issues, one would be disconnecting all of the residents from the existing connection. And they would abandon that connection and their backflow device. The other would be the City's ability to collect fee for the water that we pump through that single point connection. Tolsma: Wouldn't' Nampa Meridian (inaudible) Smith: If it is maintained by Nampa Meridian then yes we can bill Nampa Meridian for it. If it is maintained by the homeowners association then we need a separate agreement with the homeowners association as Wayne explained to me that would be, would allow us to bill them and collect from the homeowners association. Tolsma: Well, the two people I visited with that was their prime concern was what they were going to do early and late. They said if that could be eliminated then they wouldn't have any problem with it. That is all 1 had. ITEM #10: ORDINANCE #712 - WHITESTONE ESTATES SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION: Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING L Meridian City Council October 17, 1995 Page 13 • Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to approve the preliminary plat for Salmon Rapids Subdivision No. 3 conditioned upon all the staff requirements being met and ACHD requirements being met, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #8: TABLED OCTOBER 3, 1995: ..RAMON YORGASON: REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF WELL DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION: Kingsford: We have received a request from Hubble Engineering the applicant's engineering firm requesting a deferral of that to the November 7 that should be the November 8 meeting. Tolsma: So moved Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to table this until the November S meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #9: TABLED OCTOBER 3, 1995: ORDINANCE #713 -LOS ALAMITOS SUBDIVISION N0.3 ANNEXATION: Kingsford: Does the Council have any question about that at this point? Counselor, would you look (Inaudible) do you recall? Crookston: Yes I do, that was tabled in this case regarding the school site that was referenced in Salmon Rapids that was not in Salmon Rapids, but it was tabled to obtain a deed for that site. It is a park and a school site. McCall: Thank you again Mr. Mayor, I can update the Council on the status of the school site, park/school site. It is approximately 2.2 acre piece that sits on the extremity of this phase that we are now requesting annexation for. I think actually back in early September the Council passed the findings of fact, recommended annexation and asked the City Attorney to prepare annexation ordinance. This school site, it was always the developers understanding that ~ we could accommodate the Meridian School District with this school site they would be happy and this Council would be happy. As a result of that in July of this year we entered into a binding contract with the Meridian School District No. 2. The terms Meridian City Council October 3, 1995 Page 22 discovered that it may not be, if the Highway District concurs that is safe then we wouldn't need to amend those. I would suggest that we table items 5 and 6 until we get clarification of that. Morrow: Okay, it was a different issue that is in error in the findings of fact and conclusions. I will move then that we table items 5 and 6. Yen'ington: Second Ingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max that we table items 5 and 6 to the next meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #7: TABLED SEPTEMBER 19, 1995: RAMON YORGASON: REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF WELL DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION: Kingsford: It has been asked to be tabled as well on the lot development fee, I think Mr. Ramon Yorgason wrote you a letter requesting that. Yerrington: So moved Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to table item 7 to the next meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #8: TABLED SEPTEMBER 19, 1995: ORDINANCE #713 -LOS ALAMITOS SUBDIVISION NO. 3 ANNEXATION: Ingsford: Do you have that ordinance? AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THEN 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T.3N, R.1 E, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like to have ordinance #713 read in its entirety? Seeing none I would entertain a motion on #713. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I have a question with respect to this, this is Los Alamitos No. 3, was Meridian City Council November 8, 1995 Page 5 interpreted that once that letter was received it triggered these findings of fact. Forrey: I think we are proceeding then on the right course to get back to Planning and Zoning with the updated plat and hopefully in February back to the Council with some hard and fast and firm to look at. Kingsford: So we are looking at February 6 then that this would be tabled until February 6 and we would take up that plat at that point. Forrey: I would take probably that second meeting in February just for a safety margin there. Kingsford: February 20 Forrey: That should v+rork, thank you. Kngsford: Is there a motion to table the annexation and zoning request to February 20? Yerrington: So moved Morrow. Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Walt to table the annexation and zoning for Highlands Ranch Subdivision by Gem Park II Partnership until February 20, 1996, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #5: TABLED OCTOBER 17, 1995: RAMON YORGASON: REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF WELL DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION: Kingsford: Has the Council reviewed that request? Morrow: I guess the question in my mind is this has been tabled several times by the request of the applicant and we were awaiting some information to Gary Smith from the applicant as to where we were at. Could Gary address, I know in our packet there was a letter from Hubble Engineering to Gary. It seems to me the issue before has been tabled repeatedly at the request of the developer and then it was tabled trying to resolve the problem with the cross connections or potential cross connections. So, where are we at with that? • • Meridian City Council November 8, 1995 Page 6 Smith: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Morrow, the Applicant did submit the map that I believe you have in your packet showing those lots that have been sold and have been built upon. Also shows a lot that was connected to the City system for sprinkler and has subsequently been disconnected. That all of the lots are being served by the pressurized irrigation system as installed by the developer. The only issue that remains from my standpoint is since this system is being provided water from an irrigation ditch is what happens to the water supply when the ditch water does not exist. The location of the pump facility is somewhat distant from the existing water line. It may be necessary for them for the developer to construct a water line from their last phase, their closest phase to that pump station so that we have a single connection, single point of connection to' provide water when ditch water is not available. Otherwise the property owners will be, it will be necessary for them to connect to the City system for their alternate source of water when the ditch water is out of the ditches. Morrow Wasn't that some point of contention between the Council and staff the last time as to how, if those cxoss connections remain how they're kept checked so on and so forth. Didn't we have a problem in that arena? Smith: Well, yes Councilman Morrow, it is a problem just from a standpoint of being able to monitor that the bads flow devices are checked on an annual basis. It is a requirement that they be checked on an annual basis, it is a problem for us to do the leg work and make sure that they are checked on an annual basis, at this point in time it is. We know that we have a lot of bads flow devices in operation that are not being tested annually. So that is why the Public Works Department is encouraging a single point connection in a subdivision from City system that could provide water through a single back flow device. Kingsford: Do we have an agreement Gary from this Homeowners Association that they will in fact pay City water on that single point? Smith: No, we don't. Kingsford: I think given some of our history that is something that we also need to have. Something in the way of a contract to that effect. Smith: Wayne Crookston has mentioned it that we do need to have an agreement with the homeowners association, con-ect. The only other system that we have in operation right now is being managed and operated by Nampa Meridian Irrigation District and the bills are being sent to Nampa Meridian for payment. Morrow. And do they pay them? Meridian City Council November 8, 1995 Page 7 Smith: I don't know that we got, this was the first fall that the system was connected to City as well as the ditch. I don't know whether, I can't answer that Councilman Morrow, I don't know I do know that they were assessed for the 4 inch meter that went into the system, they did pay that. I don't know about the water bills. Morrow. Do we have a method to guarantee collection from Nampa Meridian? Smith: I don't know that there is a separate agreement between the City and them, I am not sure. Kingsford: Maybe we can put a lien on their property and sell it after three years. To answer part of your question there Walt, the billing hasn't been out long enough for us to receive payment on that. So I am not sure whether they have or not. Well it would seem to me we'd be premature to grant any kind of a return until we have a contract with them on payment. Morrow. Well, I think that, it seems to me we need to take it from two points, one is we need to have a contract on payment from the homeowners association and two we need a commitment on the part of the developer Mr. Yorgason that we will get a single point of connection. If there is no commitment for the single point of connection if we already have a problem inspecting multiple backflow devices 1 don't think it is in the City's best interest to perpetuate the problem. Smith: I think in my September 20 memorandum to Mayor and City Council I also sent a copy of this to the developer and I state that either a shallow well needs to be built or the City needs to allow a cross connection back flow device on city water for each home being built. Reportedly the developer has entered into an ownership maintenance operation agreement with Nampa Meridian. Since an alternative water source to the ditch water is not being provided at this time it appears the property owners will still need to rely on city water for the time.period ditch water is not available. Morrow. And there has been no response on the part of the developer? Smith: The only thing we have received is the letter you have received a copy with that map. Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I would move that we table this until our first meeting in December to give the developer time to answer those four points that Gary Smith will have for (inaudible) Yerrington: Second JVIWAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., Cfiy Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parr Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Flre Chief W.L. `BILL° GORDON, Polics Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney December 6, 1995 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ~ r`OUNGIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON CITY OF MERIDIAN w~~ Mo ow 33 EAST IDAHO P & Z COMMISSION MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ~ JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 MOE ALIDJANI Public WorkslBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 JIM SHEARER Motor Velricle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 CHARLIE ROUNTREE TIM HEPPER GRAINY P. KINGSFORD Mayor r ®E C ®7 ~99~ Mr. Claudio Scalasi, PE Hubble Engineering, Inc. 9550 Bethel Ct. Boise, Idaho 83709 ~~TY ~ ~G~~~~ RE: CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION WELL DEVELOPMENT FUND REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST Dear Claudio: At last nights City Council meeting, Councilman Morrow requested that this item be tabled to the December 19th Council meeting at which time the question of who builds the single point connection station to a city water line must be resolved. This was put into the form of a motion and passed by the Council. Tuesday morning, December 5, 1995, I had a conversation with Gene Smith and was told that the station would be built by Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District rather than the developer since the District has signed an agreement with the developer to own, operate and maintain the pressurized system. We need confirmation from the District. I believe the resolution of this issue is all that is needed for the Council to act on your developers request. Sincerely, ~'j~ V Gary D. Smith, PE City Engineer cc: File City Clerk f • s MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19. 1995 The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by City Council President Ron Tolsma at 7:30 P.M.: MEMBERS PRESENT: Walt Morrow, Max Yerrington, Bob Corrie: OTHERS PRESENT: Will Berg, Wayne Crookston, Gary Smith, Shari. Stiles, Bill Gordon, Jim Johnson, Marty Goldsmith, Jim Hourte, Robert Baumgartner, Doug Hoy, James Burdick, Mr. & Mrs. Gugel, David Collins, Michael Forsy, John Sheets, Lori Adamson, Kevin Merritt, Jim Bourquin, Marlo Burquin, Samya Gotcher, Casey Gotcher, Bill Howell, Angie Howell, Michael Fluto, Maida Hutner, Lynn McThomas, Maclcolm MacCoy, Jonathan Seel, Wes Kelly, Teny Smith, Ted Hanson, Dan Vie, Robert Green, G. Howe, Maureen Howe, Norma Vice, Ralph Shoemaker, Gene Smith, Brian McColl, Dave Roylance, Ted Hutchinson, Ted Hanson, Mike Wardle, David Turnbull, Becky Bowcutt, Russ Hunnemiller, Steve Bradbury, Roy Harada, Jay Reeves, Mervin Lingley, Lynn Thomas, Brad Miller, Michael Clark, Lew Lous, John Shipley, Fred Bell, Dirk Marcum, Elaine Schlekeway, Lany Derkin: MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD DECEMBER 5, 1995: The minutes of the previous meeting held December 5, 1995 were approved as written. ITEM #1: TABLED DECEMBER 5, 1995: RAMON YORGASON: REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF WELL DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION: Gene Smith: (Inaudible) the agreem ke the connection twas nnot part of that agreement system. The agreement for them to that is why Mr. Yorgason has committed to make that connection. Crookston: I would recommend that the City be shown or have a copy of that agreement so that the City can ascertain that it is in fact in place. Gene Smith: The agreement with Nampa Meridian? Crookston: Yes between City an e p Yorgason has agreed to do that Nampa Meddian has not. Gene Smith: The agreement with Nampa Meridian does not include the connection d th ressure irrigation system. That is what I am saying, that Mr. Crookston: But you do have an agreement between Ramon Yorgason and Nampa Meridian Irrigation District do you not? .~ .' Meridian City Council December 19, 1995 Page 2 Gene Smith: Yes, it is their system. Crookston: I think the City should have a copy of thafi. Gene Smith: And we can provide a copy. Crookston: And a written statement as to Ramon's willingness and obligation to do the single point of connection. Gene Smith: And that can be provided. Crookston: I think that is what we need Gary. Smith: That is fine. Gene Smith: I would propose that based on providing that evidence to the City Engineer that it be approved based upon that. Morrow. Mr. President, I would like to move that the Council approve the request for reimbursement of well development fees to Crossroads Subdivision subject to receipt of a copy of the agreement between Nampa Meridian and the developer of the Crossroads Subdivision and a written statement from the developer that he will do the single point of connection and anything that is required to make that effective. That would authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk, and City Engineer to review that documentation and being the reimbursement. Yerrington: Second Tolsma: It has been moved and seconded to grant the request for reimbursement of well development fee for Crossroads Subdivision subject to the licensing agreement between Nampa Meridian Irrigation District and Ramon Yorgason and also a letter from Mr. Yorgason stating that he will commit to the single point hook up and that everything will be go from that point on. Morrow. No, the motion would authorize upon receipt of that information and approval of that information the motion would authorize the City upon the approval of the Mayor, the City Clerk and Gary Smith to begin reimbursement of those well development fees. Tolsma: All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ,~ •R MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE ~4 Glennfield #3 which is of course beyond the gaoundaries of Crystalspri.ngs Subdivision. They have mentioned that they would like to pipe it but they don't have the funds to do this. Unless some kind of a deal could be worked between Settlers and other parties that were involved in that subdivision, I don't know of any other methyl to get the pipe installed. The developer of #3 I've heard is not interested in participating in piping of the ditch, now I l~taven't talked to him specifically. He did have to give up 18 ft. of ground there fnr easement that basically is going to be a line of weeds. ' Myers: It looks to me like if we had that piped from where it goes into where ik3 is on the north side of Sandalwood all the way hack to Cherry Lane probably is where it should be done. Maybe if we could get tie folks all together maybe we could get that all tiled down as far as to where ~ folks are. Preston: That was very much in our interest. We didn't want to pay for the entire cost of that pipe. We would certainly welcome the City's participation all that you can to help us there. The thing we don't want to happen is to hold up our entire plat until someone else agrees to do something. We would very happy to work with the City or someone else to get that tiled. Tolsma: What's the plan for that drainage ditch on the west side of that property? Preston: It will remain open and fenced out. Tolsma: Is there an easement or right of wage on that? Preston: Yes the Bureau of Reclamation has a easement. Giesler: There is a number of .comments that came from the City Engineer about the number of lots. Preston: These were addressed at the Planning & Zoning Meeting and we concur with Mr. Smith's comments. We are going to drop one lot in one area to make certain that we get our 70 ft. frontage around the aaldesac. The Motion was made by Tolsma and Seconded by Myers to approve the preliminary plat subject to preparing an 18 foot easement and hopefully working out arrangements to the that prior to building. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM i45: PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT FOR PUD GENERAL BY GFdKTONE, INC. Kingsford: At this time I will open the Public Hearing, hearing no response I will close the Public Hearing. The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Myers to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Gemtone, Inc. for a conditional use permit. Roll Call Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Myers - Yea; Giesler - Yea; Tolsma - Yea: Motion Carried: All Yea: MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE ~5 The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Myers to approve of the Conditional Use Permit for Gemtone, Inc.: Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM ~6: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR VACATION OF WALKWAY EASEMENT, SETTLERS VILLAGE BY STEIN & PAMELA WOOD: Kingsford: I will now ,open the Public Hearing, is there anyone that would like to offer testimony on this issue. Stein Wood, 1762 Jericho, was sworn by the attorney. Wood: I haven't prepared a statement, but I did send a letter. The one thing that is not mentioned in the letter is the different interpretations of the property. The various interpretations are that I'm supposed to build an access way paved for my neighbors use, that the property isn't mine and I cant build a fence across it. Everything else is basically stated in my letter. Giesler: He is aware that there will still need to ~ an easement through there? Stein: Yes. Kingsford: Anyone else to testify? Jerry Rohan, 1774 Jericho, was sworn by the attorney. Rohan: I have letters with me tonight from three other families. We need that easement for access to the rear of our property. The surrounding areas are zoned commercial and we won't have any access to get back there to take care of that. The letters that I'd like to give you deal with safety hazards, area behind our homes, we really have at times a severe weed problem. There is no other way to get back there to haul out the weeds which are large. Reading through the convnnants of our subdivision they are somewhat jumbled. Spoke about fences, walkway easements, title company. (TAPE ON FILE) We feel that we have really been violated, because it states in the covenants that you can not do that. We as a group fell that if the vacation is allowed to happen that our rights as homeowners will be violated. Giesler: Doesn't your property lines go clear to the back, even into the weed area back there? Rohan: Yes. Giesler: How-come the fences weren't put out - Rohan: There is a utility easement 10-15 ft. I believe back there. Giesler: I know in most other subdivisions the fence is taken to the property line. This is a very unusual situation. The weeds out there, you say they will be cut down, the times. I have been out there, the weeds were higher than the fence. This is a poor design and should never have happened and I think you should be moving your fences back there and be taking advantage of that yard and keeping those weeds down. OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer MEMORP~6dDUM TO: FR®M: RE ion pt~ rid a I have nevi comments for y of the appl icy l . The 8, ~ frontag ~. Provisio property domestic HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAI~T 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor his _z,„ submittal r i'~ f o t duri y ur dec ~,,~ ~^ e =. ~ t nt a a l: by R-#a^~arlance needy tp_ be may east a ~~ter tensions. ~~~ '`~'` and si e m sing COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI May 6, 1993 r the following ,ion as conditions ~cess: {~ ~-~> fr access ~v cis, 8~9 foot wide o the adjoining itary sewer and ~,g ,;. ~. A 1;~" dia. a line is stubbed nab°he northwest corner of Lot ~ - ck rom the est...~ik:'I'~1 1~" dia. sewer 1 ine exists along a the. ~szde of Lot ~ - Block 1 and crosses Eagle d t ~^$ '~:.,'"I~ r~,,~l~h„~~";,;"existing access into t h e Treasure Valle'+ Busine~`~~°£-~°e~r't""er. For service to this development, and facture extensions east and south, a 1~" dia. water line will need to be built along Fairview and Eagle Road. City policy requires a iQ1" dia. water line be built on mid-section lines so a 1(d" dia. line will need to be constructed in the Fairview Avenue access road fr^om Fairviear to the so~tth boundary and in the sooatherly most Eagle Road access road from Eagle Road to the east boundary. MpS'UR, COUtdCIL, PLP~RIPdIiyG ~ ZD6~.lIRlG GARI' 73. GMITI-8, P. E. CROSSROflDS SUBI1"° "' ~~'°" `~ { PRE L I M I RICA RY.~.f ~~± ~t. Sewer line depths at the east boundary need to be such that the line(s) can be extended east to the city impact boundary. r~ U 5. A variance needs to be requested foa^ blocla lengths easceeding i,C~l~~i feet. There are two of these shown. Ea. Street names need to be shown and approved by the Ada County Street Blame Committee. ~. F111 irrigation and or drainage ditches cat^rying water across this parcel shall be enclosed with a pipe si?ed to carry the historic flow of water. ~. Who will maintain any storm drainage®retention facilitnes ooatside the p~obl is t^ight of ways CJ 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 Phones: Area Code 208 Meridian Planning & Zoning 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho. 83642 Re: Crossroads Subdivision, Preliminary Plat Capitol Development Corporation Commissioners: OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 All laterals and waste ways must be protected. Municipal surface drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. Bill Henson Foreman pc: District Water Superintendent File - office File - shop ,~~ z~ w= -. _~ r _ ~_ - -- _ i - ~ ~ n ,`~ e _ ~ PLC'' _. , a - ~ ~,.:, 't - - ~ ~ ~~ '°," F ~ ~'.-- - _ - - APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 '22 April 1993 INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE TO: ACRD Commission DATE: May 10, 1993 FROM: Development Services SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION (Developer - Capital Development Corp., 2304 N. Cole Rd., Boise, ID 83704) (Engineer - Hubble Engineering Inc., 9550 Bethel Ct., Boise, ID 83709) FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. Crossroads is a proposed 256-lot residential, 5-lot commercial subdivision on 154.5 acres of property located at the southeast corner of Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road (State Highway 55). There will be 14,810-feet of new public streets added to the system. 2. Three entry streets are proposed to provide connection to the arterials of Fairview and Eagle Roads past the large commercial lots (80-feet of right-of-way in these areas) and into the residential area (50-feet of right-of-way) in the southeast corner of the site. The right-of-way and roadway width may need to be at least 60-feet and 41-feet back-to-back of curb from the main roads to the first intersections in the residential area. This will be determined from the results of a required traffic impact study. 3. The proposed alignment of Emerald/Pine runs along the south boundary of this property, identified as a collector road by the Functional Street Classification Map. Part or all of the right-of-way should be acquired from this project if the alignment is construed to run along the mid-section line (which is the south property line of this project). Impact fee funds may be used to acquire the right-of-way for the collector. The staff has identified three options for the consideration of the Commission regarding the reservation of right-of-way for Emerald. These are: ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 JAMES E. BRUCE, Prudent GLENN J. RHODES, Vice Prudent CHARLES L. WINDER, Secretary ~` • i PRELIMINARY PLAT - CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION May 10, 1993 Page 3 7. Assuming that a corridor for Emerald will be established in close proximity to the south boundary of the property, at least one stub street to the south should be provided. The property on the east of this property is owned by a church which has previously expressed its objection to having any stub streets extended to its property line. The traffic study will aid in determining whether or not the stub streets should be required, and if so, where they should be. 8. Fairview Avenue currently has 100-feet of right-of-way and is improved with 70-feet of pavement. The 2000 Urban Street Functional Street Classification Map designates Fairview Avenue as a principal arterial roadway, which generally requires a minimum of 80-feet of right-of-way (the District is requiring 114-feet of right-of-way for this road), width sufficient for 5 traffic lanes (65-foot street section) and 5-foot sidewalks. The ultimate right-of-way should be acquired now to minimize acquisition and con- struction costs in the future. In the interim, the developer should be required to construct 5-foot sidewalk, or dedicate the cost thereof to the Public Rights-of-Way Trust Fund. 9. The ACHD Capital Improvement Plan shows Fairview as currently operating at Level of Service (LOS) E and is projected to operate at LOS F in 2010. It is not approved for use of Road Impact Fee funds to increase its capacity; therefore, Road Impact Fee offsets may not be given for construction of the roadway improvements along Fairview by the developer, but may be given for right-of-way dedication in addition to what exists now. A person seeking offsets must submit an application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACRD Ordinance #188. 1990 traffic counts on Fairview indicate approximately 27,150 ADT east of this project. 10. Eagle Road (State Highway 55) is under the jurisdiction of Idaho Transportation Department. The applicant should coordinate his planning with that Department for requirements and comments. 11. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission on May 11, 1993. J PRELIMINARY PLAT CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION • May 10, 1993 Sage 5 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right- of-way shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 2. Dedicated streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 3. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACRD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 4. Provide written approval from the appropriate irrigation/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 5. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drainage appurtenances, etc.) outside of the proposed street improvements. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. 6. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across parcel. 7. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 8. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACRD. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the requirements of the City of Meridian and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of-way or in a drainage easement set aside specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable amenities placed in said easement. Drainage easements and their use restrictions shall be noted on the plat. 9. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACRD. 10. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. .~ ,. ! i`T~ " .~! r 1 ~-- 5 i i i i - - i 1 1 1 1 1 1 e i i I I ~~ ~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ • ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -~~ d ~~ Z C ,~ ~ _~3 W 1 I Y ~~ ~~ =.. .•-- • • -•_ ~~• n 1 • 0 ~ ^ ' ~ i • 1 ' t ` ~ ~• e .• ~ • ~ r • i ` V • ~ ~ r • • • • • (u • s ~ •'• = ~ .~ '. . •tsa •. .. ~ - ~ • ~ v° ~ ' y = O- ~~ ~. ~,~ ..~ .a • • W • f - G• u ~ " • • '~ W 0 d j m I 1 ~ W • ~ QQ ^ r • • ~ ~: i ,~~ ~ , ~ l ~ ll~ l l • L C ~E~~g~~~ MAY 1 9 1893 CITY ®~ iyI:RID1Aiy JAMES E. BRUCE, President GLENN J. RHODES, Vice Resident CHARLES L. WINDER, Secretary May 13, 1993 TO: Capital Development Corp. 2304 N. Cole Road Boise ID 83704 FROM: Larry Sale, Supervisor Development Services SUBJECT: CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAT On May 12, 1993, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") approved the Preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: 1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of- way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District: a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho Registered Professional Engineer, together with payment of plan review fee. b. Execute an Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. c. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of construction of all street improvements. ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Bob L. Haley O~ EXCEL DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT ~ ~~ ~~~g~ ~~~ Dan Mabe, Finance & Administration C~! y L DIRECTORS 2 ~~~\~~~ ,~ Jim Carberry, Secondary ~ MAY 1 3 1993 Christine Donnell, Personnel Q Darlene Fulwood, Elementary ~ ~~~'~ ~~ ~~~~1~~ Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 PHONE (208)888-6701 May 6, 1993 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Crossroads Subdivision Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Crossroads Subdivision. This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is beyond capacity. The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a need for additional school construction. 6Je ask your support for a development fee statute on new home construction or a real estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we ask that additional residential development be denied. Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school as it may be necessary to bus students to available classrooms across the district. We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike paths and safe pedestrian access. Sincerely, ~~ Dan Mabe, Deputy Superintendent DM:gr JUN 15 '93 03~01PM CAPITAL .1f1° t3N Td G4NDUCT M~EA~Ifi~ AND ~ S AN0 IN~I~IITY AGREEMENT HO!_D Capital Tfl~S T. Past-It'" brand tax transmittal memo 7671 1 e ors - i (We } the Appj i ~sA~n1r (~ } f+e~r Crossroads Subdivision before the City o'F~ M®ridian. hereby acknawle~d~te that my tour ) Application was noticed in the valley Ple~w~ to be publicly heard an Tuesday Jurt~r 18, 11993 at ?:30 p,e., Y (We) al=so acknowlodee that t:tt:y nffic4ais ~ to t.hs 6aest Q# their lcncwl~e, ~liaNe that property r~wners wit ~ i n 300 feet Qf mY (our) pro~'arct wore Properly natif ied of this p+~blic hear ine . I t We) also urnd+~rstand that City aff~.cials aan of locate the certified iatai].in9 form whioh uerifiee the trail ng and contains the U.8. Foetal Service postntar k . That i { w®) her fiby aonsettt and ages, and epecif ical ly acktwwied~e that my (our) Application was noticed by the City on the date tnoticed fo plabl is hear ine which is June 16 , 1993, and I (wa) ha~r+a'bY ralea a the city from any and +~11 liability. whatsoever, for p~aae®ding without a Dopy of the certified twailin® fvsm and aat~ee to bald the City of Meridian harlsless, end asiree to indemnify ~.he City for all damatiee that it may incur, as a result of hear~.no Imy tour) Applic=ation 4ti June 1~,i993. That thi: directia' and agreement is entered into voluntarily, frer~ly, and under duress, a® it is in my ~ our) beet inter+sst to hava~ the Applio tiort acted upon ae soon as po~ible, and to hav® the Applicati n heard on July 6, 1993, is+ to my {our) dioadvantass * and ldue to this disadvantntae I (wo 3 ant { ar'd ) wi3,X~tng to relasma the city frOtA all liability and ~o hold the Cwi~tyY~h®rroless and ndemnify the City for all liability it rosy i..M~i a D~ateci tt>fm -lath ~la~ of June . 1993: Z0'd TLZ£: ~ cS:ST £bbT-6Z J~if' CENTRAL •1 DISTRICT 'i11'HEALTH DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE • 707 N, ARMSTRONG PL. • BOISE, ID. 83704 • (208) 375-5211 • FAX: 327-8500 To prevent arul treat disease and disability; to promote healthy lifestyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality of our environment. 94-084 February 18, 1994 DAVID NAVARRO ADA COUNTY RECORDER 650 MAIN STREET BOISE ID 83702 RE: CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION Dear Mr. Navarro: ~ ®F ~~~~~~~~ Central District Health Department, Environmental Health Division has reviewed and do approve the final plat on this subdivision for central water and central sewer facilities. Final approval was given on February 15, 1994. No lot size may be reduced without prior approval of the health authority. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, .~-- Thomas E. Schmalz, E.H.S. Senior Environmental Health Specialist cc: Tom Turco, Director HUD Capital Development Inc. Hubble Engineering City of Meridian Ts:ch " Ser^ing ~aIley, Elmore. 3oise, and rich %ourcries Ada /Boise County Office 707 N. Armstrong PI WIC Boise • Meridian Elmore County Office 1606 R b t Elmore County Ofice Valley County Office . Boise, ID. 83704 o er s 520 E. 8th Street N. Boise. ID. MounTCin Home, ID of Environmental Health P.O. Box 1448 190 S. 4tr, Street E. McCall ID 83638 Enwro. Health: 327-1499 Family Planning: 321. 7400 83105 Ph. 334-3355 83647 Ph. 581-4407 324 Meridian iD , . Mowtcin Nome, ID. Ph. 634-7194 A T.f^i.:nLah ~r~~:.2'-?"~' , . 8'.,5."2 ~h Cad ~~~_ 83647 Ph. 587.9225 i i __ ~__ C~fVG ~~~~ JQ ~ ' ~ 1994 JAMES E. BRUCE, President GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary Gary D. Smith, P.E., City Engineer Meridian City Hall 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Crossroads Subdivision Dear Gary: January 8, 1994 The developer of Crossroads Subdivision has advised me that the City has withheld authority to proceed with utility installation in the development until he has "worked out the problems" with ACRD. Please be advised that the concerns about traffic in the overall project have been resolved to the District's satisfaction. Briefly, this will require the disconnection of the northern access to Eagle Road (Congressional Drive) from the residential portion of the project. The "street" will become an entrance to the non- residential portion of the project only. Additionally, a "ring- road" type of route will be provided around or through the non- residential part of the project from the future Pine Avenue to Fairview Avenue to assure that the residential and non-residential traffic are not mixed and that non-residential traffic is not routed through the residential area. Stub street connections are being required from the residential portion of the project to the Pine Avenue corridor for future connection and to the property on the east (the church property). The developer has agreed to these revisions and is in the process of making changes to the preliminary plat for the record. As you may recall, the ACHD Commission did not give unqualified approval of the original preliminary when it was referred from the City last summer. The District required the preparation and acceptance of a Traffic Impact Study for the project prior to actual approval of the preliminary plat. This acceptance of the Traffic Impact Study and the implementation of its recommendations will complete the approval of the preliminary and with these changes, the preliminary plat meets the conditions of ACHD as determined by the Traffic Impact Study and can proceed with final platting and construction. In order to complete the preliminary plat approval, ACHD staff will prepare a staff report of approval and complete the review process of the application through the ACHD Commission. ada county highway district 318 -East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 ~~ ~.. ._ a G JAMES E. BRUCE, President GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President SHERRY R. HUGER, Secretary Mr. Ramon Yorgason, President Capital Development, Inc. 2304 N. Cole Road Boise, ID 83704 Re: Crossroads Subdivision Dear Ramon: s ~~~~ ®F ERI~~A~ ®EC 2 3 199 December 22, 1993 The District staff has concluded the review of the traffic study prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. This letter represents the District's findings and staff recommended requirements for approval of your project. These recommendations, or variations of them, will be included in a standard staff report and forwarded to the ACHD Commission for action. Because of the holidays, and to give you and your consultants time to review these findings, a revised staff recommendation will not go to the ACHD Commission before the meeting of January 12, 1994, after a staff report is finalized at a Technical Review Committee meeting on January 7, 1994. Staff concerns and suggested remedial actions are as follows: 1. As determined by the traffic analysis, the commercial component of the development represents 90 percent of the peak hour traffic volume. In addition 'to the traffic study, special notice is given the letter from Mr. Tom Wright dated December 7, 1993 in which he stated his belief that the future traffic in the area would be even greater than the traffic study report projected. 2. An alternate roadway plan that separates the commercial and residential traffic is necessary. Without a major redesign of t~.p project along the lines of one of the following alternatives or others that are developed with you and your consultants, the project is not acceptable. A. Congressional Drive should be terminated and not allowed to enter the residential area. A pedestrian/bicycle access should be provided in place of the street connection shown on the preliminary plat. The basis for this request is to minimize cut-through traffic from Congressional Drive to Reagan Drive. The Presidential Drive to Reagan Drive route will still allow some cut-through, but the route will be much more circuitous and will discourage the cut-through practice somewhat. However, this alternative will probably develop problems with left-turns at the Presidential/Eagle intersection. ®c!a county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 ~ d December 22, 1993 Page 2 B. The current layout results in too much traffic on streets that do not have potential for a future traffic signal on Eagle Road. No more than a single traffic signal on Eagle Road at Pine is appropriate. Create a ring road around the commercial area, separating the commercial and residential components of the project. Tie the residential streets into the ring road, thereby eliminating the commercial cut-through traffic. The ring road will have to intersect Pine a minimum of 600-feet (preferably 900-feet) east of Eagle Road and the additional site traffic added to Pine will most likely require a second left turn lane from Pine onto Eagle Road. The additional width needed on Pine to accommodate this additional traffic will be a site impact funded by the developer. This will also require the construction of a portion of Pine Avenue that otherwise would not be necessary. The ring road should tie into the existing Reagan Drive south of the non-residential uses, then directly to Fairview. The north- south residential street should tee into the Reagan Drive at this location also. C. An alternative to the ring road is to separate the vehicular traffic of the non-residential and the residential sites completely and access the residential component of the project from two access roads off Pine. This alternative will minimize the internal site conflicts and left-turn problems on Eagle Road but will require new access points to the undeveloped Pine. Without a ring road, a fairly direct interior routing of the non- residential traffic out to Pine will be necessary to provide safe left turn opportunities onto Eagle Road. We invite you and your engineers to meet with District staff to discuss and resolve these issues. Please call to arrange a time that we can all get together no later than January 4, 1994. Sin rely, rry S e Develo ent Services Supervisor cc: Chron Project File Traffic Services Hubble Engineering, Inc. Dobie Engineering, Inc ~Flayne S . Forrey, AICP Tom Wright • BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GEMTONE, INC. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT--GENERAL FAIRVIEW AVENUE AND EAGLE ROAD MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled matter having come on for public hearing January 8, 1991, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., the Petitioner appearing through Tom Wright, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian having duly considered the evidence and the matter, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That a notice of public hearing on the Conditional Use AMBROSE, FITZOERALD &CROOK8TON Attorneys end Counaelora P.O. Box 427 McHdian, Idaho 83842 ' Telephone 8881481 Permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for January 8, 1991, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the January 8, 1991 hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That this property is located within the City of Meridian and is owned by the Petitioner, and is described in the • ! application, which description is incorporated herein as if set i forth in full; the property is in the southeast and the AMBROSE, FITZCiERALD & CROOK3TON Attomeye and Counaeloro P.O. Box 427 Meridian, Idaho 83842. Telephone 888.4481 southwest .quadrants of the intersection of the Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road; Petitioners propose to develop the property in mixed use fashion containing both Commercial and Eight Industrial uses as a planned unit development-general. 3. That the property is located in what is presently designated in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as the Eastern Industrial Review Area; the Industrial Review Areas are generally addressed in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan at Page 15 and read as follows: INDUSTRIAL REVIEW AREAS: The Industrial Review Areas are an essen is a amen of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Special uses of land must be recognized as having special needs and diverse impacts. Designating certain areas for business uses, as a method of guiding business expansion, is an appropriate approach to Meridian's economic future and provides for the essential difference between the City's business land market and the residential land market. The Comprehensive Plan intends to prepare for Meridian's business and employment future by reserving land for industrial, retail, commercial and office uses and so removing them from the categories of land on which residential development can be proposed. In all review areas, detailed economic analysis is essential, so that the specifics of industrial plans, designs and development will be known. Each Industrial Review Area is recognized as possessing unique physical and locational characteristics, both natural and man-made, which make it a desireable business environment. These characteristics are relatively level topography, potentially good access to rail and freeway f aci 1 ities, and being relatively free from environmental hazards. A specific set of policies has been prepared for the development of each of the Review Areas and is discussed in a later section of the plan document. 4. That the specific Eastern Industrial Review Area is • discussed at Page 19 of the Comprehensive Plan and reads as follows: EASTERN INDUSTRIAi REVIEN AREA/POLICIES: 1. It is the policy of the City of Meridian to encourage and promote the development of an interchange (egress and ingress) at the intersection of Eagle Road and Interstate I-84 by the Idaho Department of Transportation. (This policy was recently deleted from the Plan since the interchange has been constructed.) 2. It is the policy of the City. of Meridian to encourage and promote the development of an overpass, if an interchange is not feasible, at the intersection of Locust Grove and I-84 by the Idaho Department of Transportation. 3. The character, site improvements and type of industrial developments should be harmonized with the residential area to the south (on the upper bench), the contiguous residential area to~the east and north. 4. The utilization of the linear open space corridor of Five Mile Creek, which passes through the Eastern Industrial Review Area, should be maintained as natural resource for both aesthetic and environmental reasons. 5. That the land is presently zoned I-L, light Industrial. 6. That a planned general development is defined as follows: Planned General Development (PD-G) - A development not otherwise ist7nguishe un er Tanned Commercial, Industrial, Residential Developments, or which in the proposed use of interior and exterior spaces requires unusual des ign flexibility to achieve a completely logical and complementary conjunction of uses and functions. This PD classification applies to essential public services, public or private recreation facilities, institutional uses, community facilities or a PD which includes a mix of residential, commercial or industrial .uses. AMBROSE, FITZOERALD & CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Boz 427 Meridten, Idaho 83842 Telephone 88&4487 7. That the Zoning Schedule of Use Control, 11-2-409 presently contains a category for general or industrial planned • • nit developments; that the schedule allows a planned unit evelopment-general as a conditional use in the I-L; that a Tanned Unit Development - Industrial is an allowed use in the -L zone without a conditional use permit. 8. That the property to the west is vacant ground with AMBROSE, FlTZGERALD dCROOKSTON Attorneys and Counseloro P.O. Box 427 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Telephone 68&1481 ome residential, farm and commercial uses; the property to the ast is vacant .property and farm ground with a few residences; he property to the south is farm ground 'and Light Industrial; he property to the north is farm ground and residences. 9. That proper notice has been given as required by law nd all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission ave been given and followed. 10. That part of the property has been platted and is resently developed with roads, curb and gutter and sidewalks in ome areas; there is one existing business in the area which is freight and trucking depot; that the other portion of the ubject property has not been platted or developed; that the ortion which has been platted has sewer and water lines installed. 11. That the Applicant has not submitted a petition signed by at least 75~ of the people owning property within 300 feet of the property indicating their approval of the' use of the property as requested by Applicant as such is not required under the conditional use requirement in the I-l zone. 12. That the City of Meridian does have control guidelines anal requirements for planned developments in 11-9-607 and such are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met; including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property; 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to grant conditional uses pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and, pursuant to 11-2-418 of the Revised and Complied Ordinances of the City of Meridian, Idaho; 3. That the City of Meridian has authority to place conditions on a conditional use permit and the use of the roperty pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and pursuant to 11-2- 18(D) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of eridian, Idaho; 4. That 11-2-418{C) of the Revised ana ~ompiiea rdinances of the City of Meridian sets forth the standards rider which the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City ouncil shall review ,applications for Conditional Use Permits; hat upon a review of those requirements and a review of the acts presented and the conditions of the area, the Planning and zoning Commission concludes as follows: a. The use would, in fact, constitute and a conditional use permit would be required by ordinances. AMBROSE, FITZCiERAID &CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Boz 127 AAeridlan, Idaho , 83812 Telephone 88&1481 b. The proposed possible uses apparently would be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan as amended, but the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, requires a conditional use permit to allow the use. ~ ~ c. The proposed possible uses apparently would be designed and constructed, to be harmonious in appearance with the intended character of the general vicinity. d. That the proposed possible uses should not be hazardous nor should they be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. e. Sewer and water service are installed in some of the area. f. The possible proposed uses would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and the possible proposed uses would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The proposed possible uses would apparently not involve a use, activity, process, material, equipment or conditions of operation that .would be detrimental to person, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic or noise. h. Sufficient parking for the property and the proposed use must be provided. i. The development and probable uses will likely not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. 5. That all development in the area shall be controlled and guided by design review, and shall be guided and controlled under 11-9-607, Planned Development, and shall meet all of the ordinances of the City of Meridian. 6. That the application and proposed possible uses are in nMSROSE, FITZ(iERALD BCROOKBTON Aitomeya and Counseloa P.O. Box 127 Meridian, Idaho , 83842 Telephone 8881181 compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan 'and with the granting of the Conditional Use, if done so, the application and proposed possible uses and development would be in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. 7. That the granting of this application would be in the best interest of the City of Meridian. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL: Commissioner Hepper Voted` Commissioner Rountree ~ Voted 1~~~ Commissioner Shearer Voted l~f-~ti- Commissioner Alidjani Voted~r~~~ TT Chairman Johnson (Tie Breaker) Voted DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby AM8gO8E, FITZOERALD 6 CR001C8TON Aaomeye and Counseioro P.O. Boz 427 Meridian, id~ho 83842 Teleplrone 8884181 recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that the Council approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant for the property described in the applica,t~ifoen under the conditions contained herein ecificall ~1-9- 07 of the r ~ ~~ ~ ~- 5 ~~ Revised and Complied Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that any Conditional Use granted by conditioned on compliance with the conditions herein and that the Conditional U'se be revoked for failure ~to comply with the conditions. MOTION: APP.ROVED• DISAPPROVED: r ~~ MERIDIAN P & Z FEBRUARY 12, 1991 PAGE #2 Powell: Right now I not completely clear on-what the developers mode of financing is. Mrs. Arnold and her husband are moving to Boise to finance and see the construction for the first phase and I don't know whether she has financing taken care of at this time. Rountree: Did you see the comment from the City Engineer that would indicate that there would be no direct access from any lots on Pine Avenue? Powell: Yes. No problem with access. Rountree: Does the presence of the road create any grief with the way you propose to develop? Powell: I put a couple of concepts before the owner, one of which would be to possibly do a slide over X on the streets and actually create an earth and burin along the Railroad and then possibly even a wooden fence to give further sound barrier. We have also discussed having a slight green belt around the perimeter, which would also outline the existing eight mile lateral to give a slight buffer in that area to. Johnson: Anyone else to testify? Hearing no response, I will close the Public Hearing. Rountree: It would be nice to have a more concrete concept before we advance it through the zoning. The Motion was made by Rountree and seconded by Alidjani to have the attorney prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #2: FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON REQUEST FOR PUD ~t~'n~:Rnr. By ~0~, INC.. Rountree: I think the conclusions should be amended to reflect that access on Fairview be limited to no more than #4,.accesses that would jointly serve adjoining subdivison parcels. The Motion was made by Rountree and seconded by Shearer that the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. Roll Call Vote: Hepper - Yea; Rountree - Yea; Shearer - Yea; Alidjani - Yea: Motion Carried: All Yea: The Motion was made..by Rountree and seconded by Shearer that the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that the Council approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant for the property described n.the application under the conditions contained herein, k . _~ • MERIDIAN P & Z FEBRUARY 12, 1991 PAGE #3 specifically 11-9-607 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; Limiting to four the number of access points off of Fairview Avenue East of North Hickory Avenue, access points to be on the common lot lines. That any COnditional Use granted by conditioned on compliance with the conditions herein and that the Conditional Use be revoked for failure to comply with the conditions. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM ~3: PUBLIC HEARING: PRELIMINARY PLAT ON CRYSTALSFRIlI~ SUBDIVISION: Johnson: I will now open the Public Hearing, is there anyone present who wishes to address the Commission, if so please come forward and be sworn. Duane Gugin, 1692 Todd Way, was sworn by the attorney. Gugin: I have a few.-questions. I live in the subdivision to the west of this proposed subdivision. What are the prices ranges of these homes? Johnson: We don't have prices, we have lot sizes. Minimum footage is 1400 sq. feet, so your probably looking at around $80,000. to $90,000. price range. Gugin: Question number two, I believe that Mr. Boesiger proposed to build another subdivision on the southwest corner of Linder and Cherry Lane approximately six months ago. Did that pass may i ask? Johnson: It passed, but he dropped it. Gugin: 120 Units is not a great deal and yet I have one question, in Sunnybrook Farms at the present times, during the summer especially we have a:.water pressure situation out there where it is very low, what is this going to do to our subdivision? Johnson: That's a good question, I don't think anyone here is able to answer that. The City Engineer is the one to answer that. You could contact him concerning this water pressure problem. . Boesiger: We are looking at between $95,000. and $125,000. price range. Gugin: With only one access into this what is this going to do to the traffic pattern? Cherry Lane is already congested. Also this 120 homes is not going to help our schools. Are they going to offer help orspromote help in pursuant to their subdivision to our schools? Johnson: That's something that you need to ask the schools. Johnson:.:At this time we'd like a representative to come forward so we can ask some questions please? Mike Preston, with Hubble Engineering, 420 Bitteroot Drive, was sworn by the attorney. Preston: In relation to Mr. Smith's comments, we can concur with the conditions put on us in relation to the various technical issues. Explained on one of the culdesacs they will be taking one home out as to meet the width requirements. We are proposing to install eight street lights. We are also proposing to complete • • MERIDIAN P & Z JANUARY 8, 1991 PAGE #4 to be kept in consideration there as far as the impact to that subdivision that we are in. I understand they need more egress also, but its easy to figure out that anybody from that end of the subdivision is going to come out that way. Johnson: Anyone else to testify? Hearing no response I will close the Public Hearing. Any Discussion. Rountree: I'm a little concerned that granted S.E. 5th is a dedicated easement but it is not a dedicated public right of way for transportation facility. It seems to me that that ought to be set up as a public right of way for future improvement. The Motion was made by Rountree and seconded by Shearer to recommend approval of this preliminary plat with the following conditions: A steady committee be put together including at a minimum the City Engineer and the developer to resolve the well issue, and water pressure issue for fire, also that the Developer adhere to the comments of ACRD once they are received, that ACHD, the developer and the City resolve the issue of the interconnector that connect with Mesa Way, and that there be resolution of the Public Access on the extension of S.E. 5th from the development to Overland Road. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #2: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST. FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY GEMTONE, INC. FOR PUD GED~RAL: Johnson: I will now open the Public Hearing, is there a representative here? Thomas Wright, 1412 W. Idaho, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Wright: I'm both a part owner of this project and in turn the marketing representative. We have applied to the City of Meridian for a Conditional Use Permit under a Planned Unit Development - General of as you are aware the TreasureYalley Business Center. They asked for and received a Industrial Light Zoning for the entire property. There was a time when this City did issue the eastern portion of this property a temporary retail:. zone for a potential regional shopping center. That zoning has since expired so the entire 300 acres is zoned as Light Industrial. Presented a photo and explained to the Commission. (TAPE ON FILE) Rountree: I have a plat of Phase I here could you outline that on your drawing. Wright: There is roughly 160 acres on both sides of Eagle Road, and about half of that west side was platted. Rountree:"~So there wouldn't be any change in the access points. Wright: No, no changes. The property that we are trying to market are the platted lots. We have a major company that has asked for 100 acres. Rountree: You show two accesses onto Eagle Road, do you have a distance between those? Wright: They are approximately ~?0+ Ft., we have those approved. Rountree: One condition of that PUD-General is the 10~ open s~ce, can you show that in the concept, what that's going to include. MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING JANUARY 8, 1991 PAGE #5 Wright: No. Presented an aerial picture taken in spring of 1990. Explained. We haven't addressed the 10~a space specifically. Rountree: My question is, what would you consider those kinds of uses? Crookston: What are the plans for access to those Iots that are in that corner on Fairview and Eagle? What about the access off the major, I mean onto these smaller lots. Wright: Showed Attorney where accesses are interred to be and these have been approved. Crookston: Are you talking about even re-doing some of this for interior roads coming off of Jewell Street. Wright: No. Crookston: What is your plan for coming to the City again when you have a business lined out thats ready to go, they know the property they want what is your thinking as to how that's going to be approached as far as additional improvements such as if the City required design review and things of that nature. Wright: Just that now the Conditional Use Permit that we anticipate that we need would be eliminated as a step but we still have to come in for Design Review and obviously a Building Permit.. Then any improvements that that user would require would also come back in. Johnson: Is there anyone else from the Public who would like to come forward? Harry Jensen 2075 E. Fairview, Meridian, was sworn by the attorney. Jensen: I was in on the original when UP wanted to develop that particular piece of property over there in Phase I, we did not object to any of it thatthey did with the exception of when they wanted. to~put in the spur line along the west side. When they were doing Phase I I requested a right of way to my property and at that time Mr. Lloyd Howell stated to the Board here it was alright if we took that up in Phase 2 and being a sucker a said yes that was fine, and they didn't put it down in the minutes and Consequently Phase 2 never come about and now I own the property on the west side of Phase I. Showed Commission where abouts the property is located. Previously we have brought our equipment down through an existing road that came down through that property from Eagle Road, well when UP took over and rebuilt that whole area, they constructed a pipe line which was to our advantage, and bring it around to the edge so we didn't have to come all that way and service that ditch, and it made it better for us for irrigation, but it did not give me access to the back piece of property. The only thing I am requesting of Mr. Wr-fight or this group is to see somehow if we can work out a way to get an access to that back 15 acres. MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING JANUARY 8, 1991 PAGE #6 .ti.- Alidjani: Wouldn't that southeast corner of that property your saying a portion of it is not under their control and there is a-green house sitting there that somebody else owns that. Jensen: Yes. Mine goes to a drainage ditch which is a ditch that can be covered up in the future. The purpose of that drainage ditch was for the farms in that area which included the farms that the different properties had, .mine and the neighbors and so on for the water to drain aff the land and go down. It's all developed, there is no use for a drainage ditch. Clerk Niemann: Don't you have access off Fairview? Jensen: I have access, my home is off Fairview. If I took fifty feet off of that property for a right of way, it would put the road within about 25 ft. from my house. Also for fire purposes I think they would want a second access to that property. The only thing I'm requesting this Board anal Mr. Wright to do is see if we can work our something as a right of way for that pr~erty so it won't be an island. Alidjani: Didn't you just day that if you oouldn't make a deal with them you do have a way to put access to your own property? Jensen: I own my house and four acres up frrnt on Fairview. If you took a fifty foot right of way all the way down my property - Alidjani: How many feet would that be from your four and the other fifteen acres? Jensen: The length of that road is I think 800 ft.. The whole problem is that canal. Johnson: You indicated you had access to this property previous to the development is that included on a deed or some kind of a document somewhere? Jensen: Explained to Commission. (TAPE ON FILE) They didn't .:make the curb cut or right of way like they said they were going to. Johnson: The cold hard facts of it might be that you will have to eventually work something out with the owners of the property. It may be something that we can-not address right now, because we are really talking about something that's outside of what we. are considering -.tonight. Anyone else from the Public that would like to testify? Nick Nichols, 5107 Overland, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Nichols: I. represent (BME) Business Managemea~t Enterprises, Inc.. We hold an option of the property owned by Mr. Harry Jensen. We took that option and began attempts to develop that land based on the premise that there was a old time agreement probably with Union Pacific for an entry from that land into the fourteen acres addressed by Mr. Jensen. We have plats ready for Meridian and we have been in contact with Ada. Planning & Zoning in preliminary to this Committee and have been advised that it is necessary to have a second entrance into that area of land. Johnson: Anyone else to testify? Hearing no response I will close the Public Hearing. Jw-Q, cS" . a DATE• MERIDIAN AGENDA ITEM NUMBER APPLICANT: --- ~15~- , ~d ~'~ 11~ 1 REQUEST : ~~'Q ~\~f~n\v1aK'V ~~~r• S`rcissr.,~ s 5~_~,1od~~~~tt~h AGENCY MERIDIAN POLICE - "~~ °~~~j~.~y~ ~ ~ MERIDIAN FIRE DEPT. - ~~1~0 ~rOb~St.1M W~~ S~It31StCJ1/~ ~ ~~~ ~r2e ~~ ~'`casln c~~nd W e.2.d5. ~~ MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER - ~S- J~~~ G~~. COMMENTS: MERIDIAN ATTORNEY - MERIDIAN POST OFFICE - MERIDIAN SCHOOL D I ST R I CT - Cx~liU~.CW~ly MERIDIAN BUILDING DEPT. - ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT - ~E~a~~ ADA STREET NAME COMMITTEE - CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH - NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION -See ~R~ac.1~.Q ~ Carnrne.h~s , SETTLERS IRRIGATION - IDAHO POWER - US WEST - INTERMOUNTAIN GAS - BUREAU OF RECLAMATION - oars ~ e~Q~' OTHER COMMENTS: MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY - r , /V `N\ ,~. ~~ ~ ~ RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. ~ 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 March 11, 1993 Mr. Jack Niemann City Clerk City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, ID 83742 RE: Proposed Subdivision at Eagle Road and Fairview Dear Jack: -, received a copy of the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for a conditional use permit on a planned unit development-general for Gemtone, Inc. This was heard at the public hearing January 8, 1991. This document says on page 2 that the petitioners propose to develop the property in amixed-use fashion, containing both commercial and light industrial uses as a planned unit development-general. On page 3, it states that the definition for planned general development PD-G includes a mix of residential, commercial, or industrial uses. Does this Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law allow a single family residential development in this area, or do we need to change the comprehensive plan? I can fax ~_~ you the entire version of the findings and conclusions if you would like. Please call me when you can to let me know. Sincerely, E. Don Hubble, P.E. EDH/bh/123.Itr d • . .. '. SENT BY: Thomas T. 41r-• ! 9ht Co ~ 3-1@-93 3: 01Fh1 20~7550~ CCITT 03;13 6 . `I`1 ~~ application. which description is incorporated herein as If set forth in full; the property is in the southeast and the southwest quadrants of the intersection of the Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road: Petitioners propose to develop the property 1n mixed use fashion containing both Commercial and ~Lipht Industrial uses as a planned unit development general. 3. That the property is located in what is presently designated in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as the Eastern Industrial Review Area; the Industrial Review Areas .are generally addressed in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan at Page 15 and read as follows: INDUSTRIAL REYIE~I AREAS: The Industrial Review Areas are an essen d e amen of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Special uses of land must be recognized as having special needs and diverse imparts. Designating certain areas for business uses, as a method of guiding business expansion, is an appropriate approach to Meridian's economic future and provides for the essential difference between the City's business land market and the residential land market. The Comprehensive Plan intends to prepare for Meridian's business and employment future by reserving land fpr industrial. retail, commercial and office uses and so removing them from the categories of land on which residential development can be proposed. in all review areas, detailed economic analysis is essential, so that the specifics of industrial plans, designs and development will be known. Each tndustriat Review Area is recognized as possessing unique physical and locetional characteristics, both natural and man»made, which make it a desireable business environment. These characteristics are relatively level topography, potentially good access tv rail and freeway f acs 1 sties, and being relatively free from environmental hazards. A specific set of policies has been prepared for the development of each of the Review Areas and is discussed in a later section of ,w1s~a4E, the plan document. ~1°0K°TOM 4. That the specific Eastern Industrial Review Area is A~nrra M+a Oov~ t~aa~ w~-,~ r..a tM,~~+wti ~~ Z-- OFFICIALS JACK NIEMANN, City Clerk JANICE (iASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Worka Supt. WAYNE l3. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney EARL WARD, Waste WeterSupt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chlef BILL OORDON, Police Chlef t3ARY SMITH, City Engineer April 2, 1993 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT OIESLER MAX YERRINOTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI E. Don Hubb 1 e, P. E. 9550 Bethel Court Boise, Idaho A3709 ~:~.~..;~~,w~u.~r N ~< ~ ~ ~ Dear Mr. Hubble: ~.~ ~ :~, ~~ ~. I have rev~~wed your request regax~diny3vth including a max. ofi rv `residential, commercia a`nd within the P1~rtined Un~~~1~~~n~f~~era1 tP Inc.. Based ;Qn my r~vaeti~t of they City :~f Mer1`.d Plan, the Ci;~y' s ~o.nin~ aid lveopm°ent Ord ~, Findings of Fact ,snd Cnricl.us~on~ of Law and h~e_a this project, I. do: not bel iev~that res~id~et7t~3~a1 will require an amendment to~.xt,~~e Gity''sm~~Comprehe Thank you-.for coordit~iatiA'ng s~o well with you City of Meridian. T~ie~t:rs~~~`"~ :,~,o~,~~ `~forw~i~^ development in this area. . ;> N; e possibility of industrial uses D-G) for Gemtone, ian Comprehensive finance plus the ring records for uses in this PD-G nsive Plan. clients and the to successful ~E~~spectful.lY, v~C~ity.~~ of-Meridian (. Wayne Forrey, AICP Planning Director ,, rn cL~ c~ true and exact CERTIFICATE: resolution is a os Board of ereby certify that thoff a lmeeting of the Dist56 pages 187 and I h recorded at Book copy from the Minutes 1992)• 2 October 1990, Directors, held 16 June 196 through 2®2 (finalized f ~- Daren R• c°on Secretary of the Board p, & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT NA1+~IP to issue land which are authorized that it is a encies have made it ]cn°~amend rules ~~g,Ag, the various g emits of e site develop'-~ent Public that this Dlbounda ies the use Chang / the P within the in the best inter fo °development and regulations eratiVe and District; and such a co®P amended been decided that through an it has can best be realized ~' arrangement coordinating and considerable permit system; eats have create a ct for which there is not available WHEgEAB, such requirements and requ expense burden t® this Distri revenues; and a olicy was Previously set of Directors held 17 Marc a Development or Lan ct s$ Boa d P of the Minutes of RgEREl,S. ®f the Distri es 65 through 69, up at a meeting Pag as Instrument #8015309 and 1980, recorded at Book 36' County and the Board anC ny ~ County a dlnstrument #g9o100', at a recorded at reviously set uP went Policy was P March 1981, a Site Develop ®g Directors held 17 of the NgERF,AB, ~ Board h 92 , of the Minutes and meeting of the Distri pages 89 throU-g Instrument X8115542 at Ada County as and recorded at Book 3 ' as Instrument X919®45; Board and recorded Canyon County and amend these recorded at to combine it has become necessary ~~~8® olicies policies® amended p that the following ®licy to take the giOyP THEREFORE, EE IT RE80LVED, established by this Board as District P 2 2 are hereby revious policies. '~ 2 ~ ® o GI~11'il`°' place of theme MERIDIAN IRRIGATION w ~ NAMPA & ° F 4 R _..-- ~n ~ ~ `,=JNj~, l Q- ~ :~ °v ', AQ `~ C ~ ERR ~ ~ _ ~~. ~ FtEG4RpER ~- ~b- z a v ~` ~ W ~ d 4~ , ~~ •92 JUN ~ P~ 1 2 N ~ ' .o~'iaea~u C • NAIYIPA ~ 1~RIDYAN IRRI~iTIOI~i DISTRICT District review. a®nerai Information A. DRAINAGE: 1. There will be no acceptance of any increased flow in storm run-off, drainage, or any contaminated waters for which the District might be made liable by the Federal and/or State Clean Water Laws. 2. Existing or replacement of on-site drainage or run-off facilities or modification thereto must be perpetually maintained by the site owner or owners. 3. Drainage plans prepared by a registered engineer may be required where deemed necessary by the District even though on-site modifications to the District drainage system are not required in the development plans. 4. If a drainage lateral owned and maintained by the District courses the site, no alterations of the lateral nor encroachment or its right of way shall be permitted without a license agreement. No access to such drain shall be denied to the District. Board of Directors° poliog for Chancges of Land IIse or site Development Developments or land use changes or site developments which affect irrigation and/or drainage, within the boundaries of Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must be approved by the District Board of Directors. An application form may be obtained at the District office which will provide necessary preliminary information for B. IRRIGATION 1. The water rights of this District are not the same throughout the District. Neither are these always the same on one tract of land. Often these can be simplified without changing the Court confirmed status of the rights, if arrangements are made with the Secretary of the District in the advance planning stages. 2. Any irrigation supply lateral or canal which is owned and operated by the District and which may course the site, must not be obstructed nor encroachment made on its rights of way. °1- ~ ~ C. 3. Any alteration from the original delivery point must be approved by the Water Superintendent and transfers to accomplish this alteration must be arranged with the Secretary of the District as part of the system plan acceptance by the Board of Directors. 4. No alteration or enclosure of an irrigation canal or lateral shall be permitted without a license agreement. No access to such canals or laterals shall be denied to the District. 5. If irrigation service is not to be provided to the individual properties, all property owners must be notified that the District tax is an obligation of all lands in the Irrigation District. This notification is in compliance with Idaho Law. 6. No destruction, interference, nor limitation upon water flows which are appurtenant to the property- rights of others shall be permitted. 7. If development plans include providing irrigation, operation and maintenance of the system may be undertaken by a Lateral Ditch Water User°s Association, in which case the District assumes no responsibility beyond the original point of delivery for the tract. 8. The District cannot provide permission for alteration of waterways belonging to and being a part of the property rights of individual land owners and to which waters flow from the system of the District. Permission must be granted from each of the property owners having ditch and water rights in the waterway. REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS 1. Applicant shall complete and submit the attached application form to the Secretary of the District. Two (2) copies of the proposed plans shall be submitted with the application. 2. Upon approval of the original application, plans and specifications for construction, prepared by a registered engineer, shall be submitted for review to the District. Plans and specifications shall be reviewed by the District Water Superintendent and/or the District°s engineers. If acceptable, the developer will be notified. Prior to actual construction an estimate of the cost of construction shall be provided to the District. -2- 3. If a license specifications its engineers, make arrangeme for which the attorney fees. agreement is required to conform to of the District and/or recommendations of the Secretary of the District will then nts for an appropriate license agreement licensee shall be liable for payment of 4. The District shall be notified prior to commencement of construction. Inspection by representatives of the District or its engineers will not constitute approval of all or any part of the system and shall in no way relieve the developer or his contractor of the responsibility for providing a sound, workable system. 5. Within ten (10) days after completion of construction the developer's engineer must certify to the District that the system was installed in accordance with plans and specifications, and furnish as-built drawings to the District. 6. The developer and/or his contractor shall be responsible for the repair of all defects, leaks or failures occurring in the installation for a period of three (3) years after completion of construction. A maintenance and warranty bond in the amount of 10$ of the estimated or actual construction cost, whichever is greater, shall be furnished to the District within thirty (30) days after completion of construction. If the owner or his contractor fails to make required repairs or replacements promptly, the District shall make them, and the cost thereof shall be paid by the owner, his contractor or the surety. The fees required will bes 5650.00 7. Attorney fees will be required only where a license agreement is required and these will be payable directly to the -law firm of the District's attorney. and, BE IT FtTRTHER RESOLVED, that the Secretary of the District is hereby ordered to send copies of this resolution to all planning and approval agencies in Ada and Canyon Counties and in the Cities of Boise, Meridian, and Nampa, to the County Commissioners of Ada and Canyon Counties and to the Mayors of Boise, Meridian and Nampa to provide sufficient copies of the policy and application form for the continual administration and use thereof by all interested parties. -3- ~~-~-_ -. A~ STATE OF IDAHO County of Canyon se. C On this 16th day of Jun• 1992, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, in and for said State, personally appeared Damn R. Coon, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS. WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. C? ~ ~p'Y Abp ~ ;~~ -~ ~ L ~ ~. ; 7~ i ~~~r' i * ~ Notary Public - State of Idaho ;~ J, 1~°UB ~, r~.rp ~.`` Residing at Caldwell, .Idaho .~~?q .~~~~~,.• ~*~••. My Commission Expires. 11/04/94 -4- r= -• ~- ~QA&ME'~o ~/ON 0~~. NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT (Reproduction of this form is not acceptable) Development or Land Use Change~Site Development Agnlication GENERAL INFORMATION 1. (Proposed Name of Subdivision or Development) 2. (General Location) 3. (Legal Description - Attach if necessary) 4. (Owner of Record) (Address) 5. (Subdivider or Developer) (Address) LAND USE CHANGE/SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - Paqe 1 of 2 -. f ~~ • 6. (Engineer) (Address) (Person to Contact] (Phone) 7. Acres ; No. of Lots ; Number of Lots/Gross Acre 8. Proposed drainage discharge (Name of Drainage Lateral) 9. Is irrigation water to be provided to property? If yes, answer the following: a) Proposed delivery point (Canal or Lateral) b) Present delivery point for this land c) Type of system 1) Gravity, (Piped or open ditches) 2) Pump pressure (Signature) (Date) (Application must be filed with the Secretary of the District. The appropriate fees and two (2) copies of all plats and drawings must be included with the application.) LAND USE CHANGE/SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - Page 2 of 2 ct T ' • O ~~r~r~~ JAMES E. BRUCE, Pre~dent GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President CHARLES L WINDER, Secretary TO: ACHD Commission MAY 1 ~- 1993 ~1TY ®F MER~~-I~J~ C~sSnR~ INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE DATE: May 10, 1993 FROM: Development Services SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION (Developer - Capital Development Corp., 2304 N. Cole Rd., Boise, ID 83704) , (Engineer - Hubble Engineering Inc., 9550 Bethel Ct., Boise, ID 83709) FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. Crossroads is a proposed 256-lot residential, 5-lot commercial subdivision on 154.5 acres of property located at the southeast corner of Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road (State Highway 55). There will be 14,810-feet of new public streets added to the system. 2. Three entry streets are proposed to provide connection to the arterials of Fairview and Eagle Roads past the large commercial lots (80-feet of right-of-way in these areas) and into the residential area (50-feet of right-of-waX) in the southeast corner of the site. The right-of-way and roadway width may need to be at least 60-feet and 41-feet back-to-back of curb from the main roads to the first intersections in the residential area. This will be determined from the results of a required traffic impact study. 3. The proposed alignment of Emerald/Pine runs along the south boundary of this property, identified as a collector road by the Functional Street Classification Map. Part or all of the right-of-way should be acquired from this project if the alignment is construed to run along the mid-section line (which is the south property line of this project). Impact fee funds 'may be used to acquire the right-of-way for the collector. The staff has identified three options for the consideration of the Co~nission regarding the reservation of right-of-way for Emerald. These are: ada county highway district ~~~0 ~~~. 7th _Rc~ic~ - _ ~~~ ^".u • PhnnP f~081 345-7680 PRELIMINARY PLAT - CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION May 10, 1993 Page 2 A. Reserve one-half the right-of-way (45-feet) from this project and use it to construct half of a future roadway. This developer could use it as one access to Eagle Road, replacing one of the two currently proposed. B. The same right-of-way acquisition as A., but do not construct any of the roadway at this time. C. Defer the decision to reserve the right-of-way by deciding to place the alignment entirely south of this project and obtain the full 90-feet from the property to the south. The property to the south is only about 400- feet in depth (north-to-south), which may limit its use to large commercial or industrial parcels. 4. Because of an existing building on the west side of Eagle Road, the location of the intersection of Eagle and Emerald/Pine would avoid the most damage if it were centered on the mid-section line. This would place the alignment on the applicant's south property line, taking 45-feet from this project. In discussions with the applicant, the staff indicated that this is a major issue which should be resolved through the conduct of a traffic impact study, expanded to study the corridor for Emerald/Pine to determine the following: A. Should the alignment be continuous from the area of Meridian to Boise (i.e., Cole Road)? B. What alignment should the route follow? 5. It was tentatively decided with the developer that the southern entrance from Eagle Road should be. moved slightly north to be better situated with regard to intersection spacing, anticipating the location of Emerald/Pine quite near the south boundary of this project. The developer wants this entrance to be the primary entrance, constructing it with extensive landscaping and islands, etc. 6. The interior layout of the project is well done, presenting a variety of views and aspects for the access ways to the individual lots. The layout develops.a good solar orientation for the building sites and a good circulation pattern so that no lots will have large volumes of traffic past them.• The project has three sub-collector streets to carry the traffic out to the perimeter of the project and then on wider streets to Fairview and Eagle. The layout reflects careful thought and design. • PRELIMINARY PLAT - CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION May 10, 1993 Page 3 7. Assuming that a corridor for Emerald will be established in close proximity to the south boundary of the property, at least one stub street to the south should be provided. The property on the east of this property is owned by a church which has previously expressed its objection to having any stub streets extended to its property line. The traffic study will aid in determining whether or not the stub streets should be required, and if so, where they should be. 8. Fairview Avenue currently has 100-feet of right-of-way and is improved with 70-feet of pavement. The 2000 Urban Street Functional Street Classification Map designates Fairview Avenue as a principal arterial roadway, which generally requires a minimum of 80-feet of right-of-way (the District is requiring 114-feet of right-of-way for this road) , width sufficient for 5 traffic lanes (65-foot street section) and 5-foot sidewalks. The ultimate right-of-way should be acquired now to minimize acquisition and con- struction costs in the future. In the interim, the developer 5-foot sidewalk, or dedicate Rights-of-Way Trust Fund. should be required to construct the cost thereof to the Public 9. The ACRD Capital Improvement Plan shows Fairview as currently operating at Level of Service (LOS) E and is projected to operate at LOS F in 2010. It is not approved for use of Road Impact Fee funds to increase its capacity; therefore, Road Impact Fee offsets may not be given for construction of the roadway improvements along Fairview by the developer, but may be given for right-of-way dedication in addition to what exists now. A person seeking offsets must submit an application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. 1990 traffic counts on Fairview indicate approximately 27,150 ADT east of this project. 10. Eagle Road (State Highway 55) is under the jurisdiction of Idaho Transportation Department. The applicant should coordinate his planning with that Department for requirements and comments. . 11. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission on May 11, 1993. ~ ~ ! PRELIMINARY PLAT - CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION May 10, 1993 Page 4 SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. The District will retain a consultant to prepare and submit a Traffic Impact Study to examine the need and proper alignment for the extension of Emerald Street through this area and to identify a corridor for preservation. The study shall also consider the effects of this project on the transportation system; specifically, the appropriate locations and operation of the access street intersections with Fairview and Eagle Roads (and, presumably, the future Emerald Street extension). The applicant will be required to pay for that portion of the study which deals with the specific effects of the project. Additional requirements may be imposed pending the findings of the study and any design, engineering or construction accomplished prior to the District's review and approval of the study is entirely at the risk of the applicant. 2. Dedicate 57-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Fairview abutting the parcel (7 additional feet). The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. 3. Construct 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Fairview abutting plat, or deposit the cost thereof to the Public Rights-of-Way Trust Fund. 4. Direct lot or parcel access to Fairview is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 5. Direct lot or parcel access to Eagle is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 6. Relocate/replace the entrances to Eagle Road in. accordance with the recommendations of the traffic study and District Traffic Services staff. 7. Shift the location of southerly access road to Eagle to the north to provide better spacing on Eagle Road. 8. Provide a stub street to the south boundary of the property to connect with Emerald Street. 9. Provide a stub street to the east boundary of the property, pending more information about the future development of the adjacent church property. 10. Comply with requirements of Idaho Transportation Department. • ~ PRELIMINARY PLAT - CROSSROADS. SUBDIVISION May 10, 1993 Page 5 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right- of-way shall be designed and .constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 2. Dedicated streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 3. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACRD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 4. Provide written approval from the appropriate irrigation/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 5. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drainage appurtenances, etc.) outside of the proposed street improvements. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. 6. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across parcel. 7. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 8. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACRD. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the requirements of the City of Meridian and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of-way or in a drainage easement set aside specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable amenities placed in said easement. Drainage easements and their use restrictions shall be noted on the plat. 9. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACRD. to . Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. PRELIMINARY PLAT - CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION May 10, 1993 Page 6 11. Developer shall provide the District with a copy of the recorded plat prior to the installation of street name signs. 12. Install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a project street to an intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be installed when the project street is first accessible to the motoring public. 13. Aright-of-way permit must be obtained from ACRD for all street and utility construction within the public right-of-way. Contact Construction Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file number) for details. 14. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services section at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING: DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: Larry Sale CENTRAL ~ ~ ~• DISTRICT o11"HEALTH Retum to: DEPARTMENT ~~~~~~~~ ^ BOigSe REVIEW SHEET MAY 1 2 1993 ^ Garden City i~ Meridian Rezone # C1T~ ®F ~~RID~A~ ^ Kuna C ditional Use # ^ ACz Prelimina inaVShort Plat ~®~,~ ~d.~l~~ ~S°t~~~~tIAS'or~ ^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal. ^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewge disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. W~ n approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: 2 feet ^ 4 feet ® 7. ® 8. 9. ^ 10. ^ 11. ^ 12. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: Central .sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water well ^ Interim sewage ® Central water ^ Individual sewage ^ Individual water The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of HeaRh and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: Central sewage ^ Community sewage system^ Community water ^ Sewage dry lines ~ Central water Street runoff is not to create a mosqufto breeding probelm. This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined 'rf other considerations indicate approval. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any: ^ Food establishment ^ Swimming pools or spas ^ Beverage establishment ^ Grocery store ^ 13: ^ Child Care Center DATE: ~ bbl ~~ Reviewed by: ~ `~~~ CDHD 10-91 rcb HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS WAYNES.FORREY,AICP,CItyClerk CITY OF MERIDIAN JANICE GASS COUNCILMEN R A , Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Worka Supt. RO ERTGESLER WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MAX YERRINGTON JOHN SHAWCROFT, weals water supt. KENNY BOWERS MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 ROBERT D. CORRIE , Fire Chlet BILL GORDON, Police Chief , Phone (208) 888-4433 .~ Chairman Zoning a Planning ~~~' / JIM JOHNSON GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 Centennial Coordinator C~1 V ~~ ~~ GRANT P. KINGSFORD M qY ~ ~ ;- ~:, PATSY FEDRIIII , l~ Mayor MAY 1 0 1993 Ci~Y ®~ ~~~~&~~~g~ C1TY ~~ ~~~~~~~~ TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Plannin andeZoning Commission, may we have your answer by: (, ~~ T, -'' s ~ ~. ~. <, ; ~ TRANSMITTAL- DATE: ~~y^t ~d'-~~_.~~i~+~ HEARING DA7 '~-' REQUEST : ~1*>+zrclLe t ~:~~ ~~, i~~3 LS.~ '~5d. '~= w ~ We require a permanent 10-foot wide public utilities easement along all lots adjacent to a road right-of-way dedicated to public or private use. Tim Adams Idaho Power 322-2047 /~ aDkw+S 'Is,3.g3 GARY SMITH, P. E. ENGINEER HUB OF T REASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, Clty Clerk JANICEGASS,Trea~•!rer CITY OF MERIDIA COUNCILMEN R BRUCE D. STUM?T, W9Y~!works Supt. N ROBERTGESLERA WAYNE G. CROOKo ~ : N, JR., A;tomey 33 EAST IDAHO MAX YERRINGTON JOHN SHAWCROFT, watte water supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ROBERT D. CORRIE BILL GORDON, Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 Chairman Zoning 8 Planning GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor TR-~NSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Plannin (ra~/n'~d~Z~opningl~{C//~o~mmissi/on, ma/~y/~we have your answer by: ~ ~~~ ~ ~ TRANSMITTAL- DATE:f :~~~~ ,;.l~/~'~ HEARING DATE:_ Y ~ • ~~~ REQUEST : • ,f~~=,. ~ ~'. L ,' ~, „~a BY: 1 /2/1~"/ ~1-OA1~.tl~L,a~:~- f~/a ..n _'i~.At'/ A/ ~'_~w lG.~.~r~r. Q ' ~- I~XOvc~{.ut/ * ~ x. LOCATION OF PROPERTY ©~-, l?ROJECT; ~(,~` ~~t/ yr ~ { ~ ~ 9 T 3~' Rl~' :~ 1~2 r u c~wr I Z :$ a ~P /rvtew .$ ~~F z ~~n~.. {; JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MERIIIiAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z MERIDYAN POST OFFICE (PREL.B FINAL PLAT) JIM SHEARER, P/Z ~~AD~1 COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRAiVT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C BOB GIE5LER, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT GARY SMITH, P. E. ENGINEER ADA..RLANNING ASSOCIATION „ ~-~`°C£IV°TRAL DISTRICT HEALTH ~NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DI5TRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO. (PREL. 8 FINAL PLAT) U. S. WEST (PREL. 8 FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PREL. 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PREL. 8 FINAL PLAT) WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER CITY ATTORNEY ~ ~ ~ ~3 CITY FILES n ~n L 1OTHER: I~Qr•i 4~i/~+/ f /R~ ~~,®~. ~~.¢j- N~t9T ~/~9v~/~l G~~dI~E•..-cr~,o°~a'~.~ Saa6~;usPsidw c k7 J"fie fi;ve ~®~.,•,.d.~ag-L Z~~s s~~y~ ~-i..a, AlD~1 3~;/d?~~l •• OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS, TrPasursr + BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning 8 Planting JIM JOHNSON Centannlal Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and~Zoning Commission, may we have your answer by: TRANSMITTAL DATE: REQUEST: HY• ' ~ LOCATION OF PROPER'T .r. __ , ~.. ,..~ ~~ ~ ~ ~7~ 1~1~~ HEARING DATE: , ~ ~' _:., , - r~ AO /r:' l~w IC ~'y~: Q ~ _ .- _. ~/W`~~A?µ+ 1175.. fl~;'~E~R03ECT: ~ l y-t~ Cf7ctfT CL loo[. PC(i !/'l~~Gt1 6Yi~~ JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MERID:IAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z MERIDIAN PDST OFFICE (PREL.B FINAL PLAT) JIM SHEARER, P/Z ~ fllT~l COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA.PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P/Z - ~ ~°°'.`.CEN`rRAL DISTRICT HEALTH .GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR +~~~ NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO. tPREL. & FINAL PLAT) BOB GIESLER, C/C U. S. WEST tPREL. & FINAL PLAT) MAX YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PREL. & FINAL PLAT) BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-(PREL. & FINAL PLAT) JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. WAYNE FORREY, AI6P, PLANNER BUILDING INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FIRE DEPARTMENT CITY FILES POLICE DEPARTMENT ^~"~^_ GARY SMITH, P. E. ENGINEER