Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutChateau Meadows #5 FP~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~~s~ MERIDIRN CITY COUNCIL / ~~~ / IL'NE 16 199C ~ PRrC 13~ ~~~~~ /~(~~ ~~~p~/ ~~7V/ ~C CN~C.~ P`'`s` The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Corrie that the rules and provisions of 50-902 and all rules and provisions requiring that Ordinances be read on three different days be dispensed with ar•d that Ordinance #579 be passed and approved. Roll ;all Vote: Yerrington - Yea; Giesler - Yea; Corrie - Yea; Tolsma - Yea; Motion Carried: All Yea: ~ ITEM #10: DEPARTMENT REPORTS: Kingsford: Let's begin with the house at Chateau Meadows first. I believe everybody is aware of this. I've asked Wayne to research and give recommendation at this time. Crookston: I reviewed the architectural drawings, and the plot plan. I reviewed and questions our Building Inspector about it, he explained to me that when he made the foundation inspection the sidewalk was covered with dirt, not just a couple of inches, there was mounds of dirt because they had excavated for the sewer and water connections. The houses next to this property are landscaped so they put the dirt on the sidewalk. He did not see the sidewalk, so he measured to determine the setbacks from the back of the proper^ty to get to 15 feet and then he went to the plot plan and it showed that there was 20 feet from what appeared to be where the sidewalk was and he approved it on that basis. !-le did not measure from the front of the foundation as it faces the street to tl-.~e sidewalk because the sidewalk was covered up. ? aise discussed also with Daunt what he felt had happened and he again pointed out on the plot plan that the figures on the plot plan a~-e not correct. The side lot lines was 86 feet I believe and the pin is shown there and he told me that the draftsman of the plans went to, there's a pin drawn on the plan and then the draftsman added five feet to that. Which in essence took it out into the roadway. When Daunt used the drawing to continue his measurements it was not correct but he couldn't tell from that so he apprcved the foundation plans. From what I observed from the p'_ot plan it appears there is just an error. Without the sidewalk being visible and available for measurement it makes it d.fficult for the Building Inspector to perform his duties. Had that peen there so that it was available for use in his measuring think.ve NO'11d have determined where that problem was and it ~o..ild have been ccrrected at that time. It definitely appears to roe :hat at least 'SX to 90X of the problem is the drawing that ,4.,s prep_.red by the draftsman. MERIDIAN CIT`( COUNCIL JUNG 16, i99~ p'AGG 14 It's the builders responsibility to conform the plans to our Crdinar,ces so that the responsibility is theirs and not the building inspectors. I think if we had to lay blame on this problem it's the person that made the drawings for that plot p'_an. That does not remove the City's complete responsibility because I suppose he could have said, well you've got to move the dirt before I can measure, which he could do. He didn't, .., assistance to the builder. Apparently it also came up that when the distance issue came up, when the garage floor was being laid and the contractor's for that, and I don't know how Da~1nt discovered this, don't know whether he's out there when they do t'-~at or not, but they claimed that there just wasn't enough distance here, but Daunt relayed that to me. Apparently the garage floor was laid prior to the stop work order. He also told me that when he did put *.he stop work order on he told them to =cntinue the work sufficient so they could close the structure in ±:, help prevent weather damage and so they apparently did whatever they have to do to close it in. In my assessment of th;s, it appears to me that it's the drawings that caused the croblem ar.d the owner or architect or draftsman or whoever drew up the plans, they have the bulk of the responsibility. Disc-.usian. McCutchen: First off you said that Da~.mt said the sidewalks were <~ll covered with dir*. because we had done out excavating for aewsr and water, that is correct. But there is every buildinc ~it2. Also the dirt was not so deep that he co~11d not have near'-fired, it was also not so deep that we could not have got a _..o~.el ar•~' gone after it. Rnother thing, he says that he did the ,,~~.,-,ring, he did not measure until he came out for a framinc _n~pection. That's when he said something was wrong. We did not _~ake .; complaint to him abo'St the sidewalk. We had noticed it ea•r'u er. When Daur.t came out to do our footing inspection, he went out to the back and he said you have fifteen feet, we said ye~_--. He went over there and talked to the concrete guys and said fey how is year setbacks on this house, they said fine. They I `pink called City Hali and was told that the pavement was the property. The Architect is here tonight and she was tell the sa~;~e thing. F~Srther explanation - see tape. You brought up on here that t-e applicant is responsible for locations, alto it says Mere, and this is from my building permit, says that it -.cold conform to specification and in full compliance with the _rd.car.ces cf the City of Meridian subject to inspection permits nl-l ~ ~Y~ `~RCC : ~ and fees as required. I came in here and I paid 8339.00 for a permit. R11 my covenants state is that I have got to build a 1300 SG. f,ot house valued at 568,000.00. I ask why I was requ.red to bring .~. a plot plan if it wasn't going to be checked'' It has be=*? approved and signed off by Daunt. My floor plan. has been, my foundation plan, my heat loss, everything has been okayed. He never measured the front to my knowledge. I'm nat picking on Da~.~nt but we've got a house right now that we don't know what to do with. We've got a stop work order. We've get a let of water damage. We are going strictly by the book that's why I brought my plans in to be checked, they were checked and they were approved. I'm going to have a house sitting there for two months until we can get this variance. F!ingsfor-d: Rgaic l'd ask Wayne to leak into this and advi=_e Cour.c:_ cf cur a.ternat;ves. Crookston. The variance .. not a realistic procedure beca~_rse our ordina^.ca require that the hardship or problem not be self created. If you take the position that it's an architectural problem, it wo~_rld be self created. You can always apply for the variance, but you have to go througt: the procedure to do it. I don't ::new that it would meet our ordinances to grant the variance because of that non self created reeuirement. The other optic:•. is for the City to put this on the record, which it is, gay that we recognioe there's a problem, the City can say that they believe that the bulk of the problem was an architectural errc:• b:_~t also recegni~e tha*. the City has certainly some exposure for __ability ar.d you let the cor,structien proceed under the condition_ it is right now. We might have to have some agr^eemcnts to hold the City harmless from future problems. You cou'_d ust acknowled,e that this was the error, this was what happered and ackr:owledge that there were mistakes made by both parties. This :s a way to approach it. Kingsford: Is it realistic Wayne that that be a note to be made on the sales agreement'' Somehow it ought to be acknowledged. Cror;ston: 'he wav to handle that is r.ot only require that in the ..,ales doc~_~.mer.t for the initial purchases but a deed restriction that goes up anytime somebody goes tc buy it. '~:ings`ord: _, that a renedy that you could deal with^ ~CC'_~._hnr.: ~~3 ~. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 16, 1992 PRGE 16 The Motion was made by Corrie and seconded by the construction to continue acknowledging an Drdinance and putting a deed restriction to to acknowledge that non-conforming building. Motion Carried: All Yea: fingsford: Thank you. Yerrington to allow error from the City allow future buyers Chief Gordon: June 1st of this year we had a promotion in the Police Department. Norm Williams has been promoted to Lieutenant and anytime I'm out of town or you need something and you can't find me, Norm Williams will be available. Giesler: It was a disappointment at the school to see him go and all the kids and staff really appreciate him. I appreciate all the help that you've given to that school Norm. Kingsford: I've really appreciate the numerous years you've spent with the Department and I think it's significant that you have the support of the whole department. I think this is a very well deserved advancement fer you. Eng. Smith: The bid specification for Well #14 is out and we will open bids on the 26th. The pump material and piping material has been ordered for the Meridian Greens boost e,^ station. They will start construction on the piping aspect of that next Monday. The South dough Sewer Interceptor is complete and ready for use. Effective June 29th I will have an engineering technician employed to help in my department. He brings twelve years of engineering experience, not only in the office but also in construction. I'm looking forward to having him on board. Wayne Forrey: Wayne Crookston and I have been evaluating the purchase offers on the phase II land acquisition project. We think by Friday we will either have them hand delivered or in the mail to the three parcels that we are wanting to acquire. After^ the Department reports, if it's acceptable to the Council, I'd like to request an executive session we are prepared to discuss one of those properties and casts and a letter we received fr^om Department of Commerce. On the roadway portion of the Phase II Project, Don Hubble met with the Highway Distract several weeks ago and they have MERIDIA~i CITY COUNCIL ^AGE 17 promised ar, expedient review of the design. Don went down and meant with them and they wanted to increase the asphalt mat from _ ?;~ overlay to 2". Instead of just an overlay, they wanted to dig up Idaho Street from the Post Office up to Intermountain Arms and put in a new storm drain line and possibly rebuild Droadway from E. First to E. 2nd and put in extra base material, substantially increasing the cost. We will save about 51,000.00 if we omit the overlay and don't disturb the drainage system. In other woi°ks iet the highway district deal with their road surface and maybe take that savings in money and put it into extra sidewalk. (Further explanation concerning the overlay and the sl~;rry seal) Kingsford: When I met with Wayne yesterday we discussed that and my initial r=action, was to let the Highway District come aver and they can beg from .s, after thinking about it for a little while, .r. ~.avin.g gene through this hat in hand issue and watching them charge the standards numerous times on First Street, you know we are not in the road business. Those roads are their concern, I'm for ust walking away from the overlay, let's build mare sidewalks and let them take care of the streets. discussion. The ^^etio^. was made by Ccrrie and seconded by Giesler to direct man ;-!~..bhle to const•-•.ct the sidewalk plans for the West part of _a__ ~r.d and slurry seal for the City rather than the overlay. Yerrington: Haw about telling the Highway District that we would give t.`em the price for the slurry seal if they want to go ahead and f'_nish the roads^ Kingsford: wc~_ildn't have a problem with that. My involvement Kith the '-lighway Commissioners has been excellent. All of the new guidelines that they come up with, that's not our business to work the streets. "lotion Carried: All Yea: Penney: Oary and I have been working on a notice to go out in the next mater bi'_l yew might need to take a look at and let us anew. Exp'_aired Inter::-cdal S~_rrface Tr°ansportation Efficiency Ret „r--=). 'L=ee t--e) ar U HGnNIZ ED 1904 ?Zaar~tia 8 ~~!eretdla~c 7v~tgatta.~ Dl~rtet 7, 1991 id Collins D Americana Terrace, Suite 120 se, Idaho 83706 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651.4395 FAX k 208.888.6201 Phonea:. Area. Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466.7861 Boise 343.1884 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 Re: Chateau Meadows East Subdivision No. 5 and No. 6 Dear Dave: On Chateau Meadows East No. 5, I still need to see the final drainage plans so that they can be reviewed and approved. The review on Chateau Meadows East No. 6 has been completed and the District has no objections. Sincerely, John P. Anderson District Water Superintendent pc: Each Director Secretary of the Board Ride 3 John Sharp City of Meridian File JPA:jj ~_ .~: _~ ~,~ ~-7ti MERIDIAN ~:~ ",~ -Y -~--,. r, ,,,, APPRO%IMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS -40,000 S~IVISION EVALUATION SET Proposed Development Name CHATEAU MEADOWS EAST N0. 5 City MERIDIAN Date Reviewed 6/20/91 Preliminary Stage Final RRXXXRX Engineer/Developer Collins En¢r./Interwest Development Date Sent The following SUBDIVISION NAME is approved by the Ada County Enginner or his designee per the requirements of the IDAHO STATE CODE. \4 SC ~~L~w~ ~?ty~ Z` must be recorded in order R. ~/L~~ Date ~~ The Street name comments listed below are maQe ~ the members of the A COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of th~Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The followin¢ existin¢ street names shall appear on the plat as "N. LOCUST GROVE ROAD" "N. LOCHNESS WAY" "MEADOWLOCH" sounds too much like "MEADOW LARK" and therefore cannot be used. "GLEN HAVEN" exists and therefore cannot be used. It is in ali¢nment with an existing street and therefore shall be named: The followin¢ new street name is over ten letters in length (countine spaces) and cannot be approved unless the Ada County Highway District will approve in writin¢ for the length of the name: "E. MEADOW GRASS STREET" The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. /~ ADA COIINTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE, AGENCY REPRES~ATIVES OR DESIGNEES r / Ada County Engineer John Priester %"' •L~ ~ ~ . ,`~~-- Date cr%/ ZO l '-'(lam Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Raynor i~ _., ~-~ ~_ f .~-~.~~ Y"-- Date , ~~ 1 / ' Meridian Fire Dept. Representative Date NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the ^final plat^, otherwise the p lat. will not be signed tt!! Sub Index Street Index ' ' Map -, ~~:k S ~ / f ,hZ~1~~+~~lx~ / >E cck 3 i~i,rf~<iy ~~.~(, ~,z y r~, - ~2 r~,~ ci N UMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS ~) KII~LLLL I'1~,~ LG"7S /4-f7 k~LClL4 l Ccli 'Z -7 /~di.iC ~ ~ ~ 'Za ~. / F'/ //~ CIfNNC,L- G'~rJc,K ~> f-O Ji~~Ge 7 , ~~~ 4- ~ ~y q ~) Cis/~IULiG /JL.G'G/L ~ ~[) f_'~[c~a , .j '2 13 14 3 8 7' 3B 35 34 ~ 8 33 I 3 32 i ' 4 ~. 3S 3 28 3 5 27 29 i 2 1 ~ 25 - --"'-~-----~_-L-- 24 29 22 21 i SO 18 37 37 10 18 20 4 12 11 10 g 16 3 1 ~ 14 S 4 3 42 - 6 0 213 ~ 2 4 1 ~ SB 15 14 13 29 SS S e ~ 0 i ~.~' _ 23 z 17 i2 •28 .~• "'~~ ~ 27 ~ ` ~ ~ ~ 22 21 20 18 18 11 ' - a' e ~ r ~• ~ ~I ~; 9 10 2B ~ ~ ~ ( ~ •l'7 '~ C~ 'v ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ 2 ~ 21 2 22 24 ..~ m rn 'F7 • (~ .%~ v ; ~ • O ~ O ~ O • ~ Cha~4eau Meadows Ea s~' ~ o. 5 i.~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ y qy 33 rn H d rn ~ rn v v ~ I-~ Y T~ H ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ Z ~ o " ~ ~ ry n~ A H L~ A ~ d ~ ~ ~ ` , : +: n Z r' ~ . ~ y p ~ C " Q G1 z ~ G ~ Y O ' Cn m -- ~ ~ j ~ ~ y 'O Z ~ f5 N ro ~ ~ y° rn z ~1 3 o v trn-' 3 U1 H ~ O H b A O 3 u, H Z Z ~ H z ~ a+ 2 "+7 y 3 ~ H b 'T1 C ^ Z H Z H r v ro ~ y ~ ~ ro v ~ ~ y ~ ~ r o rC C~ H 3 r ~ Z 4+ b ~ v H b r ro r H K z ee ti wo as n w r-i ~.ycnry ' rz w ~• . -~ ~ .-~ N. ay n o o n o o w w ~ r' ~.i I rJ N 00 b n a' m m rt~ 'c7 ~- ~ w m GY n ~. p a rn m b w \\ ~r• g rJ rr o 0o dram n n w x ~l orr c w I c w. acam ~~ w a. m ~ , m a rt o w rt o rn w rt oo ~ a, ~ ~ ~n n,r~ r• aza' 7 ~ ~ I o m~ o o n n~ ~• - m w m ~ rn d o ro o n rn n r• a c rJ o ~~ o o a w I ~ a. ~• ^~ m w o n m cn m rJ E m r• w o r- m o n m rt o cn r~ w y w o n o c a n n n ca r ~• •t O 9 ~ n n ~ l I-i ' +,E P n wv i i No w H n w n w w v+ ~ rt r• ri ... o rn o n n o n rn r O N ~ n v G m m ~ Z ~ o 7 ~ W N~ ~ Ov w ~ a n rn I m m x rt w o n r~~ `G w O m 2' r-i M rt o ^ o o y n rn o m G1 n o ~o ~ ~ w ? rn o xo ~• n t7 w G g g W N y ~ y ~ r• r m ~D w ( /] • N ~ fb rt R ~ rt R O m o .7 m n rt c w w o I n m r• R ~ rt m n F 5 'o E: n ~C n ~ a w~ o o n o' ro n i . r c r+ m n ,7 N rt w n v, a o w ~ m 9 z m rt rt ~ ~ rt 0 w n O ~ ' r o 0 0 y ~ y n n O rt n N - n n w r+ ~ w ~ o ~ n wm O rn r~n xn C m ~ rn o ~ a w n ~ m E w m o w n w n n ~ H `C •C ~ I~ IN 3 rn M d Q H SkE'z~7 rn 77..,~ 4 H G ffAA 0 m a+ m Z ~.n ~b~ C [~" H H r rm mz ~~ O IH~I m ny rC H ~~~~ ~~ I-I c m o ca c~ o ~ ro y ~ z rah C r- q (D K O M y~ rC m m 7 M ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ yy~ ~ p ~•. ~ 3 ~ 3 H tY,~ ~ ~ ~ ~5 ~ i rn l1 ~C r :CC~z.'7~ m r ao r f/ O 4 N 3 rn r N~ 6~ -~ ~_~~. f ~. FC~z40 cCcC~~ ~ HZ Z ~ l7 fA [[~<d2~y ~~~i(~~~~ (/I O N r r ~ rl p7 rrn~ 3 H yb m N r ~ ~ ~ n r m 2 ~ ~ rr yy I~-h ro H w~ O U a QQQrt (((Q~]]] C w w a m r A H 0 ~••I ~L N rC I~ r W W o ~ Hy Z H H v MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JULY 16, 1991 The Regular Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor Grant P. Kingsford at 7:30 P.M.: Members Present: Ron Tolsma, Bob Giesler, Max Yerrington: Members Absent: Bert Myers: Others Present: Leon Blaser, Erank Thomason, Linda Arnold, Gordon Wood, Greg Johnson, Barbara Giele, Wayne Crookston, Gary Smith, Bill Musser, John Matzinger, Don Bryan: MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING HELD JULY 2, 1991: The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Yerrington to approve of the Minutes of the previous meeting held July 2, 1991 as written: Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #1: FINAL PLAT ON CHATEAU MEADOWS #5 & 6: TABLED AT LAST MEETING: Kingsford: I would like to be sure that the irrigation water has some place to go. Blaser: I don't disagree with that. We've cleaned the ditch twice. The engineer has told me that what is there is adequate to carry the water, and given when it gets plugged that's where the problem arises. Kingsford: The tiling by each particular property owner, is that a grade to where it will handle that water in your estimation? Has that been checked into? Blaser: I've never checked it. Kingsford: I feel that is part of the problem, the plat was approved as an open ditch. Any other comments from the Council? Giesler: I'd just like to comment that that has had a flow that was adequate for a number of years. This problem has arisen since that project was put in so I feel it's up to us to see that it is remedied. We've tried contacting you and don't get our calls returned and before we do anything else this problem has got to betaken care of! Kingsford: Agree with Giesler's comments. It would be my recommendation that we table this or we approve it conditioned on this problem being taken care of before it is signed off. DISCUSSION HELD. (TAPE ON FILE) Kingsford: Is the City Engineer technically satisfied with everything but this? Eng. Smith: I have reviewed #6 but not #5 yet on the development plans. Kingsford: Counselor have yuu reviewed the covenants? Crookston: I haven't had a chance to review them. I have reviewed the covenants for #5 but not #6. If you want to approve them conditioned upon my approval that would be satisfactory. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JULY 16, 1991 PAGE #2 Giesler: What about the fence, did we get that resolved? Blaser: If it's a part of the plat and you require that I do it I'll put it in. The Motion was made by Yerrington and seconded by Tolsma to approve Final Plat on Chateau Med. #5&6 conditioned upon approval of the covenants, the water problem taken care of and Gary's approval of the development plans and the fence being built. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #3: PUBLIC HEARING: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MERRYWOOD SUBDIVISION: Kingsford: At this time I will open the Public Hearing and invite the developer up to speak. John Matzinger, 3198 Falling Brook Lane, Boise, was sworn by the attorney. Matzinger: I am with Toothman-0rton Engineering in Boise. Have been working closely with City Engineer and have complied with all of the requests. Giesler: Have you seen the recommendations from Ada County Highway District? Matzinger: Yes we have. Giesler: Has there been any change in that street alignment across from that home they were concerned about the lights shining into their home in the evening? Matzinger: We presented a written response to that. We will use the tree groves to make an attractive entrance. Our suggestion to the Highway District is that if this really does become a problem that possibly something could be done on the other side of the road through a small burm with dense bushes and so forth. Tolsma: It's not directly across it's just a little bit more west. Also received another letter from a homeowner on Franklin that he would like to make it known in your covenants over there that the railroad tracks and anything south of the tracks is all industrial area. We have had some noise problems in an industrial area down- twn here. Also that is a transportation corridor where the railroad tracks are and is future development and he would like to make that known. Matzinger: If the Council see's fit I'm sure Mrs. Arnold would entertain that suggestion. Explained plans for a small burin. Kingsford: Anyone else to offer testimony on this issue? Hearing none I will close the Public Hearing. The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Tolsma to approve the preliminary plat for Merrywood Subdivision. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #4: FINAL PLAT ON PHASE #1 OF MERRYWOOD SUBDIVISION: MERIDIAN CITY COt1NCIL ~ • JULY 2, 1991 PAGE # 2 issues were they have a sewer line in there and it is the City of Meridian and you already have the right to be there. secondly we were asking them to reduce their right-a-way, we are not, we are asking for a fence encroachment easement is all, and thirdly is the drainage we need to get a license agreement to discharge our drainage into their facility. Nampa Meridian Irrigation District operates and maintains that drain for the bureau and they are reviewing our plans right now and we are not asking you to approve the plat and ignoring them we are asking you to go ahead and approve the plat subject to getting a license agreement. All their conditions and concerns will be met. Crookston: What was the outcane of the Settlers ditch along the east boundry? Preston: There is a condition on the preliminary plat that we are going to live with, that condition was that we would either the the ditch or provide an easement when we got wer into that phase. There was discussion on this; Mayor Kingsford: It would be my preference and I think the Council's that the ditch be tiled all the way. Boesiger: We wiil try to get it tiled that is really our intent if at all possible. We do not feel we should have to bear the entire cost so if we can get sane others involved we will get it tiled: Giesler: What are we going to do as far as irrigation? Preston: We are proposing dry lines for a pressurized system for this phase and the preliminary plat approval required us to do the samie as you required Cherry Lane Village #3 to do. Giesler: At what point are we going to require that the system be activated? Mayor Kingsford: I think that is at the Council's desgression, I think there gets to be a point, number of units where it is cost effective to charge the system. Another thing I might offer if you will follaa what happens and hopefully it will be a positive expPSience we are looking at charging the Meridian Greens system in the spring and the fall and then they use ditch water the rest of the time. The Notion was made by Myers and seconded by Tolsna to approve the Final Plat on One Subdivision #1 subject to approval by the City FFY:gineer and than obtaining the proper license fran the Bureau of Reclamation: Notion Carried: All Yea: Item N2; ~ffk $~ _ ...., ~`~ Being there is no represe= The Motion was made by Myers and seoonded by Yerrington to table Item #2, Item #3 and Item #4: Motion Carried: liT1'YBae Item #5: Authorize Mayor to sign Grant for Facility Plan: ,. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 18, 1991 PAGE #6 Crookston: I have reviewed these and have some comments. The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Yerrington to approve the covenants for Deerfield Subdivision upon Attorney's Approval. Motin Carried: All Yea: ITEM #3: FINAL PLAT ON CHATEAU MEADOWS SUBDIVISION #5: Tolsma: I would recommend that Final Plat on Chateau Meadows Subdivision #5 be tabled because of pending water problems. Giesler: I don't understand why we need to table this. I have some problemsthath hale other items I would like them to be aware of. It was originally agreed upo P #6 would be done before moving nZftI•remetmbe~correctlysweuve madeooneladjustment already upon which it was agreed upo on doing three before doing what's now six, is that correct. It was stated lnroblem that it wouldn't go accross the ditch until it was all done. I don't have a p if they want to go ahead and continue with that project #5 now but it's to be done along with #6 and it's to be finished with 5 & 6 What thetproblem is and mawo~uld~hoPe help the developer would in fact find out maybe alleviate the problem. The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Yerrington to table this project until this problem with #6 has been remedied. Tolsma: The ditch was originally supposed to be left open and the property owners out there have tiled the ditch, which the property owners are basically at fault because now the ditch is not big enough to carry the water. Maxine Monroe: It was Mr. Morrow I believe that mentioned if the property owner does not make sure that service continues, the City can send them a letter and of theyr ti~~ do not comply, then the City can have the ditch cleaned and place a lien on the p Pe Y and collect with property taxes. This is an awful water problem out there and we do have some pictures to show or leave with you. Giesler: We do have an Ordinance and we hope this can be remedied right away. Crookston: The drainage problem has nothing to do with the Final Plat on Chateau Meadows #5. Let's make that clear. David Collins, the Engineer for Chateau Meadows. Last week my client Mr. Leon Blazer indicated to me with great concern that there was a possible problem with the drainage waste ditch on the south boundary of phase I & 2 of Chateau Meadows East. Yesterday I was able to make a visit and found the water standing on the same elevation on both sides east and west of Dixie Lane. I informed Mr. Blazer of my findings today the 18th day of June and he told me he would #1) get the pipe cleared of the blockage #2) install screenage at the inlets to the inlet structure on the east end of the project near Dixie Lane and #3) install a clean out box in the one open section that's still open. (TAPE ON FILE) MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 18, 1991 PAGE #7 The Motion previously made was now - Motion Carried: All Yea: The Motion was made by Yerrington and seconded by Giesler to table the covenants for Chateau Meadows Subdivision #5 until the next Council Meeting. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #5: BID ON DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PRQ7ECT: Eng. Smith: The Bid for the East First Street Construction Project was opened on June 10th here at City Hall. We had five bidders. Passed out to each Council Member a sheet showing each bidder and the amounts that were bid. American Paving Co. of Meridian, Idaho is the low bidder at the sum of $779,902.15, all of the arithmetic was checked and found to be all correct. Included in that bid there were several sub-projects that were wanting to be accomplished by businesses and residents that are living adjacent to E. First Street that were within the bounds of the LID Project but were not actually part of the E. First Street Improvements. They did want to have some consideration of how much it would cost to do certain improvements. To date five of those people have come forward wanting to accomplish their improvements. Those are Chapel of the Chimes, All American Insurance, Hoff Lumber Company, Brent Algers and Jay Johnson for varying types of improvements. Without Mr. Johnson's improvement, which I don't have a cost tonight for that item, including the other four the total contract amount for American Paving would be $832,766.05. The difference in costs between these two figures would be that of the individuals wanting these improvements. My request tonight from the Council would be to allow Notice of Award to be presented to American Paving Company for the total amount that would be determined after the bid for Jay Johnson's comes in and is accepted by him. Subsequent to the City of Meridian issuing the award to American Paving would be to allow Councilman Tolsma and Jack to sign the Notice to Proceed, which would be issued after they return a signed contract along with the necessary performance payment bonds and their certificate of insurance for the project. We are expecting to have construction start on July 1. The Motion was made by Yerrington and seconded by Giesler to accept American Paving's Bid of $832,766.05. The Motion was amended by Yerrington and seconded by Giesler to accept American Paving's Bid of $832,655.05 and also authorization Councilman Tolsma and Clerk Niemann to sign these documents, and to include Jay Johnson if he approves. Eng. Smith: We actually have three different things that we have to accomplish to see this project through to the end. Since we are the project administrator of the project. #1) The City has to provide construction staking, we also have to provide construction services in the form of material testing for the project and we also have to provide a project inspector on the project full time. Two of these three items we have a handle on but the third, the project inspector at this time is unknown. The other two items, we have a company in town here, Richard Rakow Construction Services. He has offered an estimated cost to me of $3300 to $4300 to do this materials testing on this project from start to finish. COMMENT S U c~TEAU MEADOWS suB. # s IIaPELaVE.ST DEVELOPMENT 1: Ada County Highway District: Nothing received: 2: Central District Health: Can approve with central water & sewer: 3: Nampa Meridian Irrigation: Nothing received: 4: Settlers Irrigation: Nothing received: 5: City Engineer: See Attached camlents: 6: Police Department: No objections: if boundrry fence installed needs to canply with City Ordinance: 7: See letter to Mayor Kingsford dated June 14, 1990 as to has development of parcel was to occur: 8: See letter to Developer dated June 12, 1991 regarding the drainage problans that have occured in Chateau Meadows #1 & 2. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION 1455 North Orchard Boise, Idaho 83706 REVIEW SHEET Ra~nne k 1~ 1. 2. 3. _ 4. We recommend denial of this proposal. Return to: Boise Eagle // Meridian Kung Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use oust be provided before we can comrtent on this proposal. We will require nnre data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can conment. 5. _ We will require more data concerning the depth of (high s~nal ground aater)(solid lava) from original grade before we can cament concerning individual sewage disposal. 6. _ We can approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located (2,4) feet above solid lava layers. 7. / We can approve this proposal for: GCeritr sewage Interim sewage Individual see.age _ Caimuiity sewage systen / and (/Central//water Individual water _ Camrtunity water well. 8. // Pla''n§§ for 1/Central sewage Camunity sewage systen Sewage dry lines, and /,Central water _Cameu~ity water oust be su6~dtted to and approved by the Regional Health and Welfare Environmental Services Field Office. 9. // Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problen. 10. _ "This delartrnent would reccmnend deferral until high s~sonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. 11. _ If restroam facilities are to be installed then a se~sge systan MJSf be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. 12. _ We will. require plans be submitted fora plan review for any (food estab].isMent)(beverage establislment)(swimni.ng pools or spas)(grocery store). 13. r' /7/ Reviewed by Date We have no objections to this proposal. -~ _..~ ( I I ( I I I ~) I I IO I I I I~ I I I I I~ ( I IH In (4 I ~.U ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~$~~~~~~~~3~3~3 c o r v~ pro, o v y£ 3 m v~ y~~ °~ `ro" ~' z H~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ H ~ ~q ~ ~ y3 (A ~Gz ~ y ~ ~ ~ Z ~ C~+7 ~ ~ h Cp Z roro~ 3 r G b [yqy" H ~ m [~^ 3 Ul r 5 O H b C] 3 m H Z z ~ H •~ a, r z a, z ~ ° ~ 3 H r b y a+ C1 o `' y r c z 8 r O H ~~ r" ,~j H K O '<' r H [~ r rri Z K Ste-] ~ ~ ~ H Z ~ HH ~ ~ K ~ ~ ~ O b ~~o ~ v o ; ,°~~~~ r~ t~o y~yHH by N ~y m Z t+J Z (] E ~ ~ f/1 Q H Ol r io ` ~ C [~TJ ~ r e®\} ~ U1 A ~ ~ ~ q OC[~~7g N W ~ p3M~ ~~ O [H+1 Z b ~nntt ~~@-pS ct m F~' ~ C] ~ yH C ~ • • ~ tH^ H O £ M b tr' W 'Hi7 ~ ''q 2 ~^z~ ~ ~' r ~ C (pH H~ p~, rt yH V ~ ~ ^ ~ r cn N N K y, r~i, ro H 't ~ ~' m°~ ~ m 'J ao d ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~~ wy v~ € ~ @~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~o '~ ~ e' yv ° ~ o~ ~ / ~ ~L H M ~~^ M v H H H Z v r s rn H K (H I (H I~ I I~ I I I I~ I I I I~ I~ I I I~ I I Iy I~ I4 I IH zzy O [~] gq [~ ~ v 3 3 H Q H C ~ O ~ H 3 ~ 3 r..' W H H 'l~7 r C"~ H H 'ca ~'. 3 C~1 m H ~ H d '~' ro ~~A C~~7 H ~z~~~o~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ H m AAro ~ yo vyy~ ~i m ~ ~ 'yy° `3 ~ ~~7 H C] Z e' O ~ a H GH] H ~ ~ ~ y Z ty m va' Er z z ~ m ~ ~ o ~ z° ro 3 r o~ r y o m~ 4 ~ ~ 3 H H ~ 2 H ro H z a+ Z '~ H ta" ~ y ¢ C] o `' y r c z ro a ~m a H ~ OO"; C r H iri Z "~ ~ H ~y 3 ~ ro T b K ~ y b ~ ~ K ~ ~ ~ O mmH a ro ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ 'P~~C 7d~ c `~ H HOC y~ryiH yb F~C~~ H rn rn .ro H ~ F-' r m ~ ~ ~'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ O r ror m H o z r ~ m ~ F' rt ~ m ~ ~ °, ro y o ,ti [nom ~ ~ ~ ~O O (D ~ N N ~ N ~~ ~w Z "a .~-33 z wa pm O H O ul r ~ y ~' ~ ~~ N O H M ~Q a c~ J ~~ H a o ~" a a y m Q E ~ ~ m ~~~ ~ 3 ~7d. ~ ~~~ ~ ° ~am~'~-'-' E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N o ~ [~ 41 ~ ~ m H ~a rj 4 ~ N p~o H h E h I _~ , ~ ~ d ~ ~~ ~~ N 3 o d a ~ a~ o ~ z ~ 3 s -~ s c.~ ~, ~ w . _ ~ o to , a- r -F VVyy~~ ~~cc v ~ ~ r d V N O F S a 1 H V M ~ a~ "~ a ~ S ~ j r - O ~ ~ ~ Z Q ~ ~ ~ ~ S N ~ ~~ ~ ~`~+ y o m ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ a ri w 5 ~ ~`~ .S ~ Q d c.~ _" N [_. w w c ~ - ~ s Ki ~ y i 6 ~ s '" s ~ .S o ~. a s s ;~ui ~ ~ a s ~~rt~ s-s~ fl a $ ti ni ~ s a ~ 040 6 3 SSid .in .7 ~ v~~+ n st 1 s ~ ~ ~ a LS.1 > _ ~~ d~ g o y Q ~ M Q 6} V a g .s Q 1L -~ '~' o S a ~ N ~ '- f „ 1 ~ o .~ h o~ 6 ~ Q ~ E ~ S d ~ ~ ~ S a t ~ ~ ~ _ tSi~ j ~ LU a N 3 S~ ~ S -!- yV~~ _ a d ~ ~ S O `1 ~ ~ 9 h ~ ' _~ ~ Z ~ ~ V ~ S ~-.~ ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ S , £ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ y a~ ~ ~R to S e w ~ as + S ~ o + s ~ M Otl 5-~ .S a ~ d ~s~a H ~' a S N~ d d C ~ i- 6 ~ a m F O a d+~ ~S ~ Q~ ~r ~ ~ a ~ a ~ d S o o S o s o~ 3 w as a~ - i Q5 S S 9 ~ s~ s Q E Z rF~] W ' ~ Vl V Vl ~ S• cC Vl CA U £' •'~,'~ H fL 'G W S j 4 [] ~ ~ Z a ~ m o a a~ Z° `' H t~ to ~Uy g ~`u~"j~ ~7 a O ~ `~ y N a to ~ O rS to (y" LGi"+ Ey v ~• q E y~ ZZ'! E Q ~ >+ 8U(~ tE~'7' ~ d4~ UtE/] C C ~ (yam] C47 W ~ ~ W "!.+ iG O ~ C!1 ~M M Nn M M m ZZ a ri ?g~ fig' ~" r~ ~ a ~ r~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ o a a ~ a a E HH' m~x ~y~ ^~~ `~' Q~ !QN~~ !(~Y~ ~ ([.i~~, H Qa aQ (Fg1.~~ H ~J W w 2. ~'O W LL Q~ l! 1L V 2: ~ 4 ~Q ~ :G UI M N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I a ~ady~ V 1N1'ERWEST FINANCI~ Ri=C~; ~~,'~J ~Y ~ Tlu~ June 14, 1990 ~ ~~r^"'" ~ d ,; ~-•~ .~~~,~.,.,;-~:-, .lie d.~-u,~`'. ~ ,[ter ,y pk '~ (l Mayor Grant Kings for ~~ 6~~J~-gD ~.t na-w ! Lec-~ idi ~ an City of Mer __ ~ ~r 33 East Idaho . Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Mayor Kingsford: I received a letter dated 8 June 1990 from Gary D. Smith, P.E. The City Engineer, regarding extending East Chateau Drive to the East boundary of Subdivision No.2. This change to the approved preliminary plat, I believe, was precipitated by a conversation between Albert E. Blaser, my father, and the Woods family. I wish to point out that Albert Blaser has no financial interest in the Chateau Meadows development whatsoever. Any conversations, allegations, etc between Albert E. Blaser and the Wood family were carried on by Mr. Blaser for his own account and interest. It is the intent of Interwest Development to develop the Stucker property in an orderly manner specified in the purchase agreement with Stucker, page 4 section I reads: Development of the approximate 53 acre parcel shall be orderly and sequential and shall begin on the Southern Boundary and progress North until all ground has be developed. Outside of the contract but part of the agreement between Interwest Development Corp. and the Stuckers is that the ground south of the Downey Lateral be developed before any ground North is platted, and that is the intent of Interwest. Interwest does not now own the ground for the Eastwardly extension of Chateau Street. The legal description for the purchase of Phase IIA describes that ground (24 lots) as shown in the preliminary plates approved by the City of Meridian. Ground outside this boundary is still owned by the Stuckers. Boise. Idaho 837Ob Phone (208) 383-034 33"~ Americana Terrace Finally, the cost for 100' of sewer and water, land acquisition, irrigation work, and the additional engineeringadditionalesewer budgeted. Phase I and Phase IIA are carrying and water costs. With no late comers agreement this additional burden I feel, is not just. If the Woods want the sewer and water at this time, let them buy the ground from the Stuckers (i'll relinquish the option for the roadway right of way) and let them put it in. If they are not willing to do this, then as demand drives lot sales, additional phases will be brought on line and the road (sewer and water) will be extended to the Wood property. ely, c A. Leon Blaser, President Interwest Development Corp. OFFICALS JACK NIEMAN N, Clty Clerk JANICE GA$$, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUAPT, Water Works Supl. W AYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney EARL WARD. Waste WaterSuDl- KENNY BOW ERS, F Ve Ohlel BILL CORDON, Police Chlel GARY SMITH. City Engineer June 12, 1991 • FfUBOFTREASUREVALLEY • A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone 888-4433 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor Mr. Leon Blaser, President Interwest Financial 3350 Americana Terrace Boise, Idaho A3706 kE: Chateau Meadows East No. 1 & No. 2 Subd. Dear Leon: COUN OILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA J. E. BERT MYERS ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON Chairman Zoning 8 Plannlnp JIM JOHNSON two times over the past several months it has been brought to my attention that a drainage problem exists somewhere along the south boundary of the No. 1 and No. 2 phases of this subdivision. the fields of several property owners living along the east side of Dixie Lane are being inundated with drainage water from irrigation to the east of the^ because it cannot drain under Dixie Lane and on to Locust Grove Road. Your development plans submitted to the City of Meridian dv not show any pipe being placed in the drain ditch that once existed along the south boundary of your property. Subsequently, apparently each home builder installed a piece of pipe in this ditch as the home was constructed. It appears from my inspection of one lot that remains open, that different types of pipe were used. I don't know how the grade was determined for the home builders installation of the pipe however, because of the flatness of the original ditch, problems could have occurred if each pipe section wasn't grade staked for installation. The amount of debris from house construction, falling into the open ditch sections and then being washed into the pipe sections, could also be a cause of blockage. I was unable to determine if any kind of debris rack exists at the inlet opening to the head structure at Dixie Lane. 1 am concerned that no clean-out boxes exist along the approximate 2,600 foot length of pipe to allow access for removing any blockage. By City Ordinance each homeowner is responsible for the pipe crossing his/her property. 1 have been in contact with either you, your office or your engineer each time I have received a call concerning the drainage problem. The three property owners having to deal with the problem are Gordon Woods, Bud Monroe and Paul Adams. I suspect, based on comments I have received from each of them, that one or more will be in attendance at next Tuesdays (June 1B) City Council meeting to voice some major concern about the drainage. Your final plat for Chateau Meadows East No. 5 is scheduled to be heard at this meeting. I would suggest that you make contact with these 3 affected property owners to address their concerns and make some provisions to install clean out boxes at 300 to 400 foot intervals in this drain line. All of my concerns, Leon, are reinforced by a drainage, or non- drainage, situation we presently have on the west side of town. It is very similar to your situation in that each property owner piped the open ditch along their rear property line with no clean-out box provision. Now the line is plugged somewhere along its B00 foot length, flooding several property owners, with no way to access the pipe to find the problem. I am sure various types of pipe were used, some with less than watertight joints, thereby compounding the problem of tree roots. If it weren't for the problems created by drainage and irrigation water our jobs would be ^uch easier. However, they mus t be dealt with in the best way possible to i nsure the least amount of problems in the future. I would appreciate your help in resolving this drainage problem. ncerely, U/~ Gary D. Smith, P.E. City Engineer cc. File City Clerk Niemann David Collins, PE 2 LS BT S'S 6i ~ SZ ZZ EZ VZ - --T------~---- -- Sz g ' S Z i BZ LZ BZ 6 S6 ~ Z6 c ~ ee e se se e L ~ c l a l s l t l e l a ~iiiiiiiiiii ~H~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~3~3~3 ~ o r x~ `~ ro a d r K n v rn c~ ~ r rn b ca C H I r ~rly H (HJ~ 'y f.' 3 C+1 ~O H ~~ H FCOp~' ~ C'9 ~ ~ Hpy yp ~ q [~iJ ,y" ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ C] ~ ~ ~ ~ CCiJ 'A H~~A l/i ~ R~7 Z Z ~zr~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~y~ ~~ ~ H tbn ~~ z ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m z~ 3~ o y~ N m~~ ~ O 3 ~ 3 y Z ~ Z H ~ H ~ a, z Z~ Y H r q :~ a+ H r ro v `' y ~ c z ~ .. t%+ zzO H aW ro y r O rn ro H z° K ~ ~ y Sri 3 ~ ~ E O ro y ~ ~ m K~~~~ r ~~~~~ ~ o ~ ~~~~ r ~ N~ ~ ~ "~~. K t+7 ~8a~ ~~" r m m ry ~ °, o r ro~ y ro ~ a ~ ~ '~ x ~~ ~ y~y NQ fi l1 Cr+ U~ (D ~ ~C 7 M ~ y rG fi r~r ~ H ~ m ~' r H rn H W H ~ ~ ~ r w o ~' Z ~ W ~ H ~~ ~ 5~~ H e myy ~ ~~ ~G M I O H N ~.-.-.. • ,,.~LS' FU} SUBnII'15I01. T,}'F ROVAL • }'RF.LI MINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING ANU ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSIO1d: A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P.M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision, Chateau Meadows East No 5 2. General' location, Hi Saction 5 T 3 N a R~ 1 F ,_' RlM_ ." *a' ^""^`" --Idr;hn 3. Owners of record, riterwest ve Address 3350 Americana Terr., Suite 100 Zi~oise8370Efl'elephone208/3850558 4. Applicant, Same Address, 3350 Americana Terr. 5. Engineer,David M. Collins., P.E./L.S.Firm Collins Engr. AddressSmte 20 Boise Idaho Zip~F3706 Telephone~naT~aa-a4s1 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name Iii --~ ^^°~~ nt - Boi ID Tele hone~OR/'i44-4451 Address 3350 Americana Terr. #100 ~i~ 83706 P PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres 8.2495 2. Number of lots 33 3. Lots per acre 3.91 ' 4. Density per acre 3.91---0.255 ac./lot 5. Zoning classification(s) R-8 , 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridiclassification b N/A ithin the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt No. R. Have recreational easements been provided for No. 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City No. - _ Explain 10 AT@ there proposed dedications of common areas? Yes. d R/W - landsca lI1 ExPlaln future TOa Explain For future parks?~ (1) ,aSQUEST FOR 1'R£LIMINARY PLAT: Planning and Zoning Commission continued Page 2 • . PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision features continued 11. What school(s) service the area Meridian do you propose any agreements for future school sites No. , Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the City None. Water Supply None. Fire Department 36 ft strePr , Other None, Explain N/A 13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination), Residential 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single family, Duplexes, Multiplexes, other S ingle family 15. Proposed development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s), 6000 b. Minimum square footage of structure(sJ,~300 c. Are garages provided for, ves square footage Variable d. Are other coverings provided for yes e. Landscaping has been provided for Ves , Describe common lot. f. Trees will be provided for yes Trees will be maintainedHOmeowner's g. Sprinkler systems are provided for yes Assn. h. Are there multiple units No. Type N/A remarks ---- i. Are there special set back requirements ves , Explain L24 & L27, B3 j. Has off street parking been provided for yes , Explain 2 Sp./Lot k. Value range of property $ 85,000.00-$ 115,000.00 1. Type of financing for development COI1VentiOnal m. Protective covenants were submitted Yes , Date 5 June 1991 16. Does the proposal land lock other property No. , Does it create Enclaves No. STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Aighway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Pferidian Comprehensive Plan. (2) t t ~`ollins engineering ompany, Inc. 6B®®(~~0@QK~h4,@~Qia Boise, Idaho 83706 (2081 il~Bil~@ 3350 Americana Terr., Suite 120 344-4451 STATEMENT OF AMID CLY~SPI.IANCE FC[t CHATEAU MEADOWS EA.4f No.:S David M. Collins., P.E./L.S. 05 June 1991 The final plat of CHATEAU MEADOWS EAST No.S has been prepared in substantial crompliance with the approved Preliminary Plat of Chateau Meadows East and meets the conditions and requirements of the Preliminary approval; it conforms to the requirements of the City of Meridian Subdivision Ordinance and with local practices and standards of engineering and surveying. The proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Cat~prehensive Plan and the current land use zone. The development will comply with all relevant City ardinances and City requirements to connect to City services. All appropriate easements are provided and street names will appear as approved by the City and/or County Street Name Committee. All street and related construction will be built to the standards of the Ada County Highway District and relevant City ordinances and to the dimensions agreed to by COLLINS and the Meridian City Engineer, including five foot sidewalks and the construction of a 36' B-B roadway section in the reduced 40 foot cul-de-sac rig way as per the request of the Meridian City chief of poli ~;;;.`E"~~"' OF HYDRAULICS HYDROLOGY HIGHWAYS CIVIL ENGINEERING UIND DEVELOPMENT SURVEYING PLANNING • 13A31 b3 3W SI Wl11V0 . StlElO1N00 100!•5 ~S3tld311 S3N1~ 031100 -133j OZ 1V~2l31N1 Ei(1O1N0~ a3(3wouH I o 5 I 1331 OOOG 0009 0005 OOpb, 000E OOOZ OOOI 0 OOOf 3lIW I SLW 6LE/.$lIW (I 0 L .5{alj .E2.U oootia~i 3ivos - . ' J I ./ uelVl..,n \.. / I ~ ~- = 0092` 6 \ ~ \ I ' , ...t '\ u I eo9z we J\ a ~ ae ~ I~ I 1 .I .; _ O I -~ a __ -..~ ol9z~ - L .d, . s P y~ ~~ IiZi IH t ~ ~ t`toez we o - =R • Old\I ~' e ; ~•I• L-.1 .\ ~ .: f9~ i1 ,~ ~, ~~ ~ t ~ ~~ I~ ~' o._ e ___ . C_ i 69 rl o • . 1 '•7bNVD awnlj~ a m _ I N'lll':I I a 5 .II . 9 .... ~. 9 ..1\. ~`) V~i~l. ~ Sy~,971 ~3,°=~"_r_-~~~.. Z.... tf5 \ ~ ~.. OZ 'S'n 01 'IW 9'Z ~ , '-~ - IW S'b 31OY3 2.. 7V2 ' ... f31Y-IBnS ~ _.. - ~ 1bH31 _.. nS • • II 5 p9 A3N.. ' Ifl:': R 9 .~~' ^+ ~~''. .., i . ~I O ..~• R .. ~ ~ \11\\S1 t R IY .• .' • '.' '. /µ V .IRI ~.'•[~ V . b ___ • \ II .~/ 31b ,. r o •il ._ ._. 7 1NnH~: ~ ~mN ---__-~ - . it ,~ ,~ II 8092, ~ . wiz -- ,.___._ _~~ ~.- r... ~esr •R ~ 1 N711 511 o a .. ......... , , _-p-_- ~~ I ~.. ,. ' b m a ...........' I; N 0 U - • a o ~ .. x. m: 0 ~• < IVTI]fVl IE•. '. 3SNnON ~ "~ • ,: ___-:____ • zsll..~ ..I '... ~ IE lY 1 3~sa'sN=;~~6... A O • n %' •, z __ v09r 1 . ~ 7bNY .~ -. I~ EI~WEST FINt1NCIt~L ~o C~~I~~J ~Y June 14, 1990 Mayor Grant Kings City of Meridian 33 East Idaho . Meridian, Idaho ~, , ~~!~~-- 6'~5'4a 83642 ~a a~ ~° ~~ c.~,-~. a~ ~Y ~ ~' Dear Mayor Kingsford: I received a letter daardin JextendingfEastGChateauSDrive to the The City Engineer, reg 4 East boundary of Subdivision No.2. This change to the approved preliminary plat, I believe, was precipitated by a conversation between Albert E. Blaser, my father, and the Woods family. I wish to point out that Albert Blaser has no financial interest in the Chateau Meadows development whatsoever. Any conversations, allegations, etc between Albert E. Blaser and the Wood family were carried on by Mr. Blaser for his own account and interest. It is the intent of Interwest Development to develop the Stucker property in an aree4lsectionrIsreadsied in the purchase agreement with Stucker, p g Development of the approximate 53 acre parcel shall be BoundaryaandsprogresslNorthsuntilbalingroundehasubeern developed. Outside of the contract but part of the agreement between Interwest Development Corp. and the Stuckers is that roundrNorth south of the Downey Lateral be developed before any g is platted, and that is the intent of Interwest. Interwest does not now own the ground for the Eastwardly extension of Chateau Street. The legal description for the purchase of Phase IIA describes that ground (24 lots) as shown in the preliminary plates approved by the City of Meridian. Ground outside this boundary is still owned by the Stuckers. 3350 Americana Terrace Boise. Idaho 83706 Phone (208) 385-0558 _ ~ • Finally, the cost for 100' of sewer and water, land acquisition, irrigation work, and the additional engineeringadditionalesewer budgeted. Phase i and Phase IIA are carrying and water costs. With ustlate comers agreement this additional burden I feel, is not j If the Woods want the sewer and water at this the ground from the Stuckers (I'll relinquish roadway right of way) and let them put it in. willing to do this, then as demand drives lot phases will be brought on line and the road will be extended to the Wood property. elyG~~ n, P2'-~ A. Leon Blaser, President Interwest Development Corp. time, let them buy the option for the If they are not sales, additional sewer and water) ADDENDUM A PURCiiASE AND SELL CONDITIONS A. Buyer to pay 58000/Acre to seller for at least 5 acres at time of closing. Seller to deed said acreage free and clear of all encumbrances to buyer. B. Buyer to pay seller 55000 at time of closing for a one year option to purchase any or all acres remaining from the original 53 acres not purchased at time of closing. Purchase price to be 58000/ acre. C. Buyer to pay seller 55000 prior to one year from date of closing for a second purchase option that grants buyer the right to purchase 5 acres minimum to all acres remaining and not purchased in year one. The purchase price to be 58800 for any acre purchased during the .second year from date of closing. If no acres are purchased during the second year or a minimum 12 acres were not purchased during the first year, then, all non-credited option monies are forfeited and the right to purchase a third year option 1s lost. D. At the end of the second year, seller to grant to buyer for $5000 a third one year option to purchase a minimum 5 acres SEG~.~ ~s to all acres remaining and not purchased in years one or two from date of closing. The purchase price to be 59600 for any acre purchased during the third year from date of closing. E. The option price paid in any year is to be deducted from sellers price for the first acreage sold in any option year. F. This Purchase specifically excludes the approximate 1.5 acres containing the 2 Stucker ..residences or such ground desired to be excluded by the Stuckers. G. If Crops are required to be removed prior to harvest, compensation is to be negotiated between buyer and crop owner prior to development of that particular parcel of ground. H. Seller to furnish a Boundary Survey to determine total acreage. Survey to be performed by Buyer's engineer. Any subsequent survey of individual parcels to be paid by buyer. I. Development of the approximate 53 acre parcel shall be orderly and sequential and shall. begin on the Southern boundary and progress North until all ground has been developed. ~~ '~j~~~k~~~"C J G /~{/~ ~~ ~/~~~~ J. This purchase offer is conditioned on: 1. Annexation and subdivision approval by the City of Meridian. 2. Capacity and ability to extend and connect to the existing City of Meridian sewer facilities in Chateau Drive. 3. Capacity and ability to provide and' receive water from the City of Meridian. 9. Buyer to meet the above conditions by S~L~ r~~. September 1, 1989. .22~~ 6~~~,~ -~''~~ Cl ~- ~ AMBROBE, FIROEMLD ICROOK8TON Coon»wn P.O. b~ 1]7 • 32`16028 ru:r. AD,1 CC~''"i'f'i, I U. FO ~j~ J. D,9VID t.?..~;~RRO RECORDER B /~ '92 JUL t3 fl~ 8 56 DEED RESTRICTION FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt of which i5 hereby acknowledged, the below signed Grantors, ALVY L. McCUTCHEN and JO FERN McCUTCHEN, owners of the land described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full herein, Grant, Bargain and Convey unto the CITY OF MERIDIAN and to all subsequent owners of the above described parcel of property, this declaration, acknowledgement and deed II restriction. It is agreed that the property above described has a house that is being constructed thereon, which construction is by Grantors, at Grantors' expense; that the ordinances of the City of Meridian require a twenty (20) foot set back from the front property line; that due to an error in the architectural drawings for the location and placement of the house, the front property set back requirement of the City of Meridian's twenty (20) foot set back requirement was not adhered to and only a fifteen (15) foot set back was afforded; that due to circumstances, this violation was not observed by the building inspector when he made his foundation inspection and measurements but was later discovered by the building inspector prior to installation of siding during subsequent inspections; that the Grantors desired to request the City to grant a variance from the City ordinance requirement but due to the fact that the violation of the setback requirement was self-inflicted, by the Grantors agent the architect, such a variance was not avai.]able; that Grantors did °°""°' ~~ DEED RESTRICTION Page I AMBROBE, PITZOEMID lCROOKBTON ~IlOmlyl~nd CWDNI01{ P.O. Box X77 approach the City to help resolve the problem of having a violation of the set back requirements; that it is declared that the violation of the set back requirement does not impede the use of the property or impose a burden on adjacent neighbors in that the property is on a cul-de-sac; at the request of the City of Meridian it is agreed by the Grantors that the Grantors will place additional concrete adjacent to the driveway so that there will be additional area for parking. It is specifically agreed by the Grantors, their heirs, assigns, and successors that they shall hold the City of Meridian harmless, and agree to indemnify the City, from, and for, any damages, whatsoever, that may arise or result from the City's action in allowing the Grantors to proceed with the construction of the house even though it is in violation of the set back ~ requirements; That the City has agreed to allow the house to be continued to be constructed without requiring the set back requirement of ,twenty (20) feet to be met, which, had the City required that the set back be met, would have required demolition and removal of what had been previously constructed which would be the sole cost of the Grantors and at great expense. That it is agreed that this resolution of the violation of ,,* the set backs is beneficial to both parties, Grantors and the City of Meridian. That Grantors SpeCifiCdlly covenant that they are the fee Simple titled owners of record of the land described in Exhibit DEED RESTRICTION Page 2 C~ • "A" and that they have the full and unrestricted right to grant this restriction. That this restriction shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding on the heirs, executors and assigns of the Grantors. DATED This /fl day of ~~ 1992. __~., ~~~~~~ ~--- STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) '~ . [y n ~~ .~`, _" , s1J• , AMBROBE, FITZOERALD B CROOKSTON At1aMy~ ~nA CouP,NOn P.O. BOR X47 MMMNn, lOMw tlM2 T~NPMm~!!6/M7 On this ~~day of 1992, before me, the undersign a Notary tc r to and for said State, personally appeared AIVY ~. McCUTCHEN and JO FERN McCUTCHEN, known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the ~ foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed ~ the same. T `,. ` TN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed ,~q~y'gffieial seal, the day and year in this Certificate first above r, •~ 0J4~ r i b t'e n•. ~ SEAC.~, ~f a u tc o a io ~,,,`~•~ Residing at:`f)')o~, e..~i ~ /-~4^ U '' DEED RESTRICTION Page 3 EXHIBIT "A" AMBR08E, FIROERAlO ~CROOKBTON Counwloro P.O. Bot 127 lot 15 in Block 4 of CHATEAU MEADOWS EAST N0. 5, according to the official Plat thereof filed in Book 59 of Plats at Pages 5728 and 5729, records of Ada County, Idaho.