HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001 07-24Meridian City Council Meeting July 24, 2001
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:35 P.M. on Tuesday, July 24, 2001, by Mayor Robert Corrie.
Members Present: Mayor Robert Corrie, Cherie McCandless, Ron Anderson, Tammy de Weerd, and Keith Bird.
Others Present: Bill Nary, Stacy Kilchenmann, Gary Smith, Bill Musser, and Ken Bowers.
Item 1. Roll-call Attendance:
X Tammy de Weerd X Ron Anderson
X Cherie McCandless X Keith Bird
X Mayor Robert Corrie
Corrie: All right. It’s 6:35. I will open the City Council regular meeting on Tuesday, July the 24th. The first item is roll call attendance Mr. Berg.
Item 2. Adoption of the Agenda:
Corrie: Item 2 is adoption of the agenda. Council is there any changes to the agenda?
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve the adoption of the agenda.
Anderson: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion made and second to approve the adoption of the agenda. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve minutes of June 18, 2001 City Council Joint Ada County Commissioners and ACHD:
B. Approve minutes of July 3, 2001 City Council Meeting:
Corrie: Item 3 is the Consent Agenda. Two items, the minutes of June 18, 2001 with the joint Ada County Commissioners and ACHD and approve the minutes of July the 3rd City Council
meeting.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd.
De Weerd: I move that we approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Bird: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 4. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda)
Corrie: Item 4, items moved from the Consent Agenda. There is none.
Item 5. Resolution No. ____01-367_______: Resolution determining/designating certain area/property for an Urban Renewal Project:
Corrie: Item 5 is a resolution determining and designating certain area of property for an Urban Renewal Project. Mr. Clerk, (inaudible) Resolution number?
Berg: 01-367.
Corrie: Okay. If the City Clerk would read the resolution by title only at this time.
Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor, members of the Council Resolution 01-367, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho determining certain property described below to
be a (inaudible) area for a, deteriorated area. I’m sorry I was watching my stadium chairs. Or a combination thereof and designating such area as appropriate for an Urban Renewal Project.
Corrie: Okay. Is there anyone from the audience who would like to have the Resolution 01-367 read in its entirety? Hearing none, Council, discussion on the resolution?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Okay. Hearing none --
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Oh, yes Mrs. de Weerd.
De Weerd: I see one of the Committee’s representatives here. Did they have any comment or just making sure we pass it tonight?
Unidentified Speaker: Just here to observe. No comments unless you have questions.
Bird: I have none.
De Weerd: Not unless you have any issues with what’s in here.
Unidentified Speaker: Not on the resolution.
De Weerd: Okay thank you.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we approve Resolution No. 01-367 with suspension of rules.
De Weerd: Second.
Corrie: Motion is made to approve Resolution No. 01-367 with suspension of rules. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the resolution say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Corrie: Not on a land use do we? Unless it’s land use? We can do it. Okay, do roll call. It doesn’t make me any difference.
Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor, we usually do them on the Resolutions and Ordinances.
Roll Call: Bird, aye; De Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd.
De Weerd: I know that we finally got this amended. I realize you’ve been working for some time on pulling together the board for this group. Will we be seeing that?
Corrie: Very shortly. I just want first things first. We want the resolution. Now we’ve got that. We’ll probably, after everybody’s contacted that’s on the list, you’ll have it
probably Tuesday night.
(Inaudible discussion amongst Council members)
Item 6. Ordinance No. ____01-921-A______ _: Ordinance amending duties of the office of the Mayor to be a full-time position:
Corrie: Item No. 6 Ordinance, Mr. Berg.
Berg: 01-921-A.
Corrie: Okay. This is an Ordinance amending duties of the Mayor full time position. If you’ll read Ordinance No. 01-921-A by title only at this point.
Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor, members of the Council. Ordinance No. 01-921-A, an Ordinance of the City of Meridian, Idaho amending Title 1 Chapter 6 Section 3 subsection A1 and 2 and
providing for a new Subsection 3 and renumbering the subsections there after providing that the duties of the office of the Mayor be a full time position providing that the Mayor is
a Chief Administrative Official of the City and shall preside over meetings of the City Council and determine the order of business subject to the rules of the Council and has superintending
control over all officers and affairs of the City preserve order and take care of that the ordinance of the City under provisions of the Idaho State Law governing municipal corporations
are complied with and providing for the renumbering subsections 4, 5 and 6 a change of the word He to the word the Mayor. All in the Section 3 of Chapter 6 of Title 1 Meridian City
Code and providing an effective date.
Corrie: Is there anyone from the audience who would like to have the entire ordinance read by it entirety? Hearing none, Council, any discussion?
De Weerd: I have none.
Corrie: Okay hearing none, I’ll entertain a motion for Ordinance No. 01-921-A.
McCandless: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. McCandless.
McCandless: I move that we approve the Ordinance 01-921-A for the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest with a suspension of rules.
Corrie: Okay do I hear a second?
De Weerd: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion been made and seconded to approve Ordinance 01-921-A with suspension of rules. Any other discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote Mr. Berg.
Roll Call: Bird, aye; De Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 7. Department Reports:
A. Treasurer’s Department – Stacy Kilchenmann:
1. Finance Report:
Corrie: Department reports, Treasurer Department, Stacy Kilchenmann.
Kilchenmann: Mayor and Council. In front of you on your bench, I put the month’s financial statements and investment report. In the future we’re going to close the month earlier so
you get this in a timelier manner. If you’ll notice, we’re starting to change the format of this. The first page you’ll have will be the notes to the financial statements which will
be a summary of my review of the financial statements. It’ll kind of tell you highlights or changes or things that I want to draw your attention to. For the enterprise fund, as you
look at your financial statements, you’ll see that Public Works has a credit balance in capital outlay for the month of June. That’s because they got their insurance proceeds from an
automobile that was wrecked which they will replace so that credit balance will be gone. The Wastewater Treatment Plant revenues have a large negative balance for the month of June.
That’s due to the correction of a large billing error that occurred in May. Then if you look, and we’ll cover these briefly, the graph behind here. You’ll notice that water revenue
collections are behind budget and that’s simply because they’re in their busy season now and trending should catch up. The general fund, two items of note. You’ll see the City Clerk
trending over budget in contract labor but then its offset by trending under in salaried positions. The police the only area that we might possibly have a budget amendment is in police
salary. They’re trending over budget in salary. That looks pretty consistent so we’ll have to analyze to see if we want to amend the budget or if we want to move money from one of
the other general fund areas. If you look just briefly behind the notes, you’ll see some graphs. What those are doing is
comparing budget to actual. It’s a fairly simple analysis. We just take the budget number we divide it by 12 and look at where we should be at this time of the year. Of course there
are variations because we don’t always spend evenly and we don’t always collect revenue evenly so, we’ll point those out to you in the notes each month if there’s some kind of variation.
So, the first page is the general fund. The second page, in Boise State colors, that was an accident is the enterprise fund.
(Inaudible discussion amongst Council members)
Kilchenmann: That was an accident. Next –
Bird: Just make sure it doesn’t come up black and gold.
Kilchenmann: Then the next behind that is the investment. The same thing that I gave you last month. We met with Bruce Moore from Buffington earlier today. We’re kind of changing
our investment strategy a little bit. The Investment Committee has just approved that we move some money so, what we’re going to do is restructure the general fund investments to beat
the debt service rate. I think its 4.53 percent that we need to beat. We talked to Mr. Moore and he’ll be kind of moving money around in the general fund so we can beat that rate.
What we’re looking at now is we’re not going to go long term because we think interest rates will probably rise so we don’t want tie the money into anything real long term. Hopefully,
we can ladder onto the hopeful increase in interest rates. We’ll be monitoring that every month. Then we’re moving some money from the building fund into the Idaho Pool because we
can get a better interest rate and we think that we’ll probably have to start using that for construction, hopefully using that for construction.
De Weerd: You better be using that for construction.
Kilchenmann: -- in December when Tom should have some design fees and so forth. That’s all I have. Are there any questions?
Corrie: Stacy, (inaudible) on the second page there, PC and (inaudible).
Kilchenmann: PC is personnel cost and OE is operating cost. Co is capitol outlay.
Corrie: Okay. Thank you. Does Council have any questions?
Bird: No. Very good Stacy.
Anderson: Mr. Mayor. I did have one question. Stacy, why would the police salaries be running over what was budgeted. Have you done any kind of analysis on that? I mean everything’s
pretty well laid out in the budget process
that you should know merit increases and pay increases and al that kind of stuff. If its not budgeted for then you don’t do it. I mean is there a reason why that’s running over or
have you looked at that?
Kilchenmann: Mayor, Council and Councilman Anderson. My understanding is that a STEP Program was instituted during the current fiscal year that was not incorporated in the budgeting
process and that’s what has caused salaries to go over.
Bird: I thought the STEP was already -- excuse me, Mr. Mayor. I know one thing Councilman Anderson that did it was if you remember we had to go back on the canine, that settlement
and come over on that. I thought the STEP Program was already in when we came into this fiscal year.
Anderson: Yes, I thought it was too.
Bird: The three years I’ve been on we’ve always ran a little over on salaries probably due to overtime and stuff unforeseen.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd.
De Weerd: Stacy, if you’ll get with Pauline and see if we did not have the clear totals when we initiated the STEP Program and see if that’s, that and the canines were the only reason
that we’re having the --.
Kilchenmann: I’ll verify that.
Bird: Thank you.
Corrie: Okay. Thank you. Any further questions, discussions?
Bird: I have none. Thank you Stacy.
B. Public Works Department – Gary Smith:
Ashford Greens No. 5 Drainage Easement:
Corrie: All right. The next item is Public Works Department, Gary Smith Ashford Greens No. 5 Drainage Easement.
Smith: Thank you Mr. Mayor, Members of Council. City Engineer Brad Watson has been working on this project so I think I’ll just turn the microphone over to Brad and let him lead the
discussion.
Watson: Thank you Mayor and Council. Hopefully in your packets you have a copy of a memo I sent to you last week that summarizes the situation. First of all, let me say that the issue
here is that there’s a Drainage Easement proposed on City property that must take Council action to approve. That’s the basis for this coming before you. It’s not a town hall meeting
that I’m trying to conduct here. It would be appear to be a simple matter of granting this easement but as you can see from the memo it involves quite a few players and some varied
opinions. Representatives from Cherry Lane Recreation, Brighton Corporation and the Ada County Highway District are all here tonight if you have any questions of them. One thing, the
reason I felt I had to finally bring this to Council is these plans for Ashford No. 5 are ready to go to construction. They’ve been through DEQ. They’re approved and this is the only
issue that keeps them or keeps us from scheduling the pre-construction meeting with them. If this Drainage Easement doesn’t work or isn’t approved where it is presently located they
would have to redesign the subdivision, redesign the streets. That’s why we can’t go to construction. There’s been also the question of the design review authority I guess that Cherry
Lane Recreation has in its lease. Mr. Nichols, I think can speak to that better than I can. He did answer me by email. I think I’m done unless there are any questions. These representatives
are here. I’m sure they would love to elaborate on what I said but I’ll answer any questions.
Corrie: Let me ask Attorney. Bill, do you want to address your take on this and then we can go through the steps of ACHD, and then the developer and then the Cherry Lane Rec people
and kind of get an idea of where we are.
Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council because this issue came up the general concept is when your property has been leased out you can’t take any action with the property that’s
inconsistent with the leaseholder’s rights in the property. That’s the general concept. I looked at the lease for the golf course which has been extended. Cherry Lane Recreation sent
us a letter last year indicating that they were exercising their 30-year extension. I also looked at the underlying agreement with, I think its New Pacific whereby the City acquired
the golf course to begin with. There’s nothing in the lease that specifically addresses a specific easement such as a Drainage Easement or any other type of easement. There is an obligation
on the part of the City which is then assigned or delegated to the lessee to maintain the golf course in essentially good condition. I mean that’s where it stands. The leaseholder
has some rights to say whether something is appropriate or not. It’s my understanding there’s not a problem with the Drainage Easement itself. The problem is with ACHD’s requirement
for a gravel road. That’s where we get the hang-up. Those are the general concepts.
Corrie: Okay. Gary let me ask you. We had the discussion this morning. Did you find out anything on that about, the Preliminary Plat? We signed and went it through. We talked about
-- I’m talking gibberish. I know it sounds (inaudible) but you know what I’m talking about.
Smith: Mr. Mayor, Council members the Preliminary or Concept Plan for the golf course area showed some drainage areas on golf course property from the subdivision. They weren’t specifically
located, or weren’t located specifically at that time but it did show that the concept of having the drainage areas on the golf course property was part of the Concept Plan. We’ve seen
the drainage areas come to fruition on other phases of the subdivision. Some of them have had some problems and some of them haven’t but they’ve, I think all been cleared up at this
point. I’m not sure of that but I think they have all been cleared up at this point. Anyway, that’s generally what happened in the past. I mean, generally speaking that’s what’s happened
in the past. That there were to be provisions made for drainage areas on the golf course property from Ashford Greens Subdivision. As Brad mentioned, or Bill Nichols mentioned the
drainage ponds themselves is not the issue here. It’s the access road, the gravel access road that’s being required by ACHD. That is, as we discussed this morning Mayor, part of their
requirement to access the drainage ponds for maintenance. Similar to what Public Works Department requires for sewer lines in order for us to access the sewer lines for maintenance.
Of course in this particular context, it appears that it’s a non -- well it doesn’t work with the golf course and a gravel road along side the fairway. That’s Cherry Lane Recreation’s
objection to that.
De Weerd: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd.
De Weerd: I guess my question is when this came through for Preliminary and maybe Final Plat, were these part of ACHD’s comments that this gravel road would be necessary? Was it drawn
in this general location at that time at that time of platting where the drainage area would be?
Smith: Brad says it was not specifically located in this area.
Anderson: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Anderson.
Anderson: Gary, it seems like I recall too there was something similar to this when we were talking about Bear Creek out there. That there was going to be some retainage ponds needed
there and that there was another way that you could engineer it where those retention ponds were actually under the ground where you could have flat level grassy surfaces. Is that a
possibility here? That they could do something similar to that? Then an access road wouldn’t be required because it would all be underground?
Smith: I think I’m going to turn it back over to Brad because I haven’t -- I’m not familiar with the details of the design Councilman Anderson. So, I’ll let Brad –
Watson: The groundwater in this area is notoriously high and the seepage beds in the right of way don’t work. They don’t meet the requirements of ACHD, the 3 feet of separation so
they have to use swales out here.
Bird: Mr. Mayor.
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I think ACHD has added this in after everything was passed, our findings, facts, everything that we did was passed if I recall right. I don’t recall ever seeing this on here
until this deal came out. Am I not correct?
Watson: Councilman Bird, Mayor and Council members. Every plat that has come through, these offsite drainage facilities hasn’t been specifically part of the plat. They are off site
on City property and we have, at staff level worked with them through the design as to the location. One thing I should point out when these plans initially came to Public Works there
were two swales in totally separate locations. This one swale is intended to serve both Phase 5 and 6. The developer and his engineer did work with us pretty diligently to get those
combined into one facility. The other two locations that were originally proposed -- this is going to be hard to explain without a map, but were at the far west end and the far east
end of the two phases combined where access wasn’t as big of an issue. However, there wasn’t a lot of room there and it tended to, well at least one location, I seem to recall and Cherry
Lane Recreation can speak to this better than I can, seemed to interfere with the normal course of play.
Smith: Mayor and Council. One of the thing that I might offer to you just in terms of the process. When the Final Plat comes before you, this type of information is not part of the
Final Plat. It’s part of the Development Plans that are engineered then from the Final Plat. Those two go together but you don’t see the Development Plans for the subdivision. Those
Development Plans are approved by Public Works Department. They’re approved on the basis of the configuration of the Final Plat. The number of lots, the street locations and so forth
but the details of building all of the infrastructure there, the streets, the sanitary sewer, the water and drainage and so forth doesn’t show up on the Final Plat which is what you
folks see.
Corrie: Okay, any other questions from Council at this point?
Bird: I have none Mayor.
De Weerd: Just one.
Corrie: Okay, Mrs. de Weerd.
De Weerd: Now, there are other drainage for other phases of Ashford Greens but they haven’t required the road, the access road? Is that because you’re combining two phases here and
it’s bigger? Why is this different than the other drainage areas?
Smith: I believe in size this is a bigger drainage swale. Brad said all the rest are right next to the public right-of-way, adjacent to public right-of-way where the golf course swings
out to the public right-of-way or near it. This is a -- the Highway District has divided the maintenance of the drainage ponds into two pieces. One is called light maintenance which
is performed typically by the homeowners association in which the drainage pond exists which is typically a common area on other subdivisions. In this case it’s the golf course so the
light maintenance would be done by the (inaudible). That includes mowing of the grass, picking up surface debris, if there is material that comes in from the street such as silts, taking
that off the ground surface. The other portion of the maintenance is what’s called heavy maintenance. That’s where the Highway District gets involved. That would be replacing anything
that is below the surface that would require equipment to maintain.
Corrie: Okay. I think at this point the key issue is this requirement if ACHD. Is an ACHD representative here tonight? If you would kind of come up and fill us in why this requirement
is here now and where ACHD is coming from and going to.
Insulman: Okay. My name is Gary Insulman. I’m the supervisor of the Development Review Division. The reason we require the access road is because the swale or the retention pond
is located along the back lot lines outside of the public right-of-way. It’s not adjacent to the public street. The master plan that we had reviewed a year ago and going through Phase
4, it included the areas of Phase 5 and 6 included the two retention ponds that Brad mentioned. They were located adjacent to the street. In that case we wouldn’t need an access road
because we can access from the street. After Phase 5 was submitted, we were told that the golf course didn’t want the ponds there so the developer and his engineer relocated those two
into one pond in the current location shown on the plans today. We do have other access roads in Phase 3. There are two cul-de-sacs with two ponds between the two and there’s an access
road linking those cul de sacs are access to retention ponds. This isn’t unprecedented. It’s a standard requirement of the Highway District that we be able to access our facilities
and is particularly a requirement of this type of facility. We do not dictate the type of facility they design. Their engineer proposed it. It meets our requirements and we accepted
it or would once the easement is approved. If the requirements cant be met than they’re welcome to submit other design alternatives or put the ponds back adjacent to the public street.
Any other questions you might have?
Anderson: I have a question. Specifically, does your requirement say that it has to be gravel road or does it just have to support a certain amount of weight? What is your requirement?
Insulman: It just has to meet the loading requirements for our trucks and there are cases where they can use grass Crete, or we’ve had, in other golf courses, they’ve beefed up the
asphalt cart path and put a gravel strip along the side of it or something so that it’s the minimum 12 feet in width. Someone mentioned Bear Creek, the bike path that’s being built
to our loading requirements so we can use the bike path to access the storm drain manholes and we have waived the width requirement to 10 feet in certain stretches of it to meet the
City’s requirements. There are other alternatives to gravel but that’s our minimum requirement.
Anderson: Okay. Thank you.
Corrie: Has it been explained to the people here that are involved in this, the golf course people and Mr. Turnball?
Insulman: I’ve dealt mainly with Mr. Turnball’s Engineer but I did speak to him briefly yesterday I believe. I haven’t spoke to the golf course people directly. I spoke to Mr. Johnson
once or twice a long time ago. This project has kind of drug out.
Corrie: Any other questions right now?
Bird: I have none.
Corrie: Okay. Thank you Gary. Dave, (inaudible). Then we can hear their --
Turnball: I don’t know if this would be appropriate, we were actually making some progress out in the hallway before you short-circuited. I thought you guys would go forever and ever
on your previous agenda. I don’t know if it would be appropriate just to ask for a 5-minute recess so I can probably talk to Mr. Insulman and Mr. Watson about something that we were
kicking around out there. Maybe it will –
Bird: We can do it.
Corrie: Is it okay with you guys? Okay we’ll have a recess for 5 minutes?
Turnball: I would before then point out that when we started this project ACHD didn’t have a requirement of the gravel roads. We do have a drainage swale in the first phase of Ashford
Greens that is not adjacent to right-of-way. It’s behind the back lot lines and it’s basically piped down, cart path access and along the back lot lines into a swale. Maybe the requirement
was there 5 years ago but it
wasn’t enforced if it was because we do have those kind of situations (inaudible). I’d like to get together with these guys.
Corrie: What (inaudible)? Give them 10 minutes? Okay we’ll come back at 20 after 7.
Reconvened At 6:35 P.M.
Corrie: -- order. David will be –
Bird: You can have mine David.
Turnball: Mr. Mayor am I okay to speak now?
Corrie: Yes you certainly are.
Turnball: I think we will work things out. I think we need to just do a little reengineering, probably redefine the easement and I think we’ll be okay. That’s kind of what we’re going
to work for. Okay. I handed this out. This is something I prepared. This was an attachment to the agreement when we gifted the property for the golf course to the City which shows
the proposed Drainage Easements. Now I must say that we have worked with the City as we have gone through the process and tried to figure out the actual best places that they would
work. I think this shows you in the agreement that we had with the City that storm drainage was always factored in. In Phase 1 they were all put in exactly where it’s shown. In fact
if you look at the top of that map at the top yellow portion, that’s the area where there’s a storm drainage swale that doesn’t have any access road adjacent to it that’s not adjacent
to any right-of-way. That’s the one I was speaking of previously. I think where we are right now. If Jennifer has a question, I’ll stand by but we’re going to try to split that easement
a little further north, excuse me not north, east to get it further away from the tee boxes. We’ll taker that drainage and shift it as much as we can give the grade that we have to
work with. Then we will install a grass crete pathway instead of just a gravel pathway anywhere west of lot 37 in the plat. I think that’s what we just agreed to. I’ll let Jennifer
--
Lovan-Holloway: Mayor, Council. Thank you guys. I mean it’s -- oh, my name is Jennifer Lovan-Holloway. Thank you it’s been a rough road. You know, Mr. Turnball I think we have something
that we can work with. Hopefully we can get it all worked out. I just want to make sure with Mike, also that -- I’m sorry, Mike, David. I’ve been dealing with Mike all along -- That
when he meets -- you are also meeting tomorrow with the access road and everything for our easements on that same hole? With Dick but everything else is – we’d like to work with --
and it, for future, where we’re trying to get them I think will be sufficient for both the city and for the golf course.
Corrie: Okay that being the case, this was mute at this point until you can (inaudible). Get everybody together.
Bird: Thank you guys.
Corrie: Thank you very much.
Bird: That’s the kind we like.
Corrie: That concludes the agenda. I would like to add one thing here. It is a letter to the dear City Council. Thank you so much for making a recycle program. It will help the
City to not be polluted and to help the City stay active. People who are serious about the helping of the environment should recycle but not only paper but many other things. Recycling
will be helping our City, also the world. Thanks again for allowing the city to make a recycling program. Sincerely Roann de Weerd, citizen of Meridian. I think that was very nice.
It’s just to the Council. De Weerd. Anyway, I ask --
De Weerd: Mayor. I think its De Weerd.
Corrie: Yes but, anyway I want -- I ask Tammy if I could put this in my office. We’ll frame it. People that come in and holler and gripe about their recycling which is almost nil
now. So, I can show them that. Again, thank you for the Ordinance No. 01-921-A. I think we’re progressing, looking forward and I think we’re well on our agenda. So, if there’s nothing
else to come before the Council I will thank everybody for a quick meeting. It’s 7:30 I’ll entertain a motion to adjourn.
Bird: So moved.
Corrie: All in favor say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:30 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
APPROVED:
ROBERT D. CORRIE, MAYOR
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK