Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSchroeder Apartments RZ 03-007June 30, 2003 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING JUIy 3, 2003 APPLICANT H. John Cook RZ 03-007 ITEM NO. 5 REQUEST Public Hearing -Request for a Rezone of .165 acres from R-4 to O-T zones for Schroeder Apartments - 921 West 2nd Street AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: COMMENTS See attached Comments See o~laC.ned ComfnerL~s See attached Comments Q,~,(L7'1~ t'VLQ,I/1 l~ }~ ~O~ro~~., ~ C ~~ INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: See attached Petition"and Affidavit of Posting Contacted: 111Y~ Date:[~~ Phone:` ~-~ Q Materials presented ai"p`u~b-li~c-meeti-nga shall become proper#y of the City of Meridian. RECE~"~L J U L - 3 2003 CITY OF MERIDIAN crrYOFm~x~;~~°.~; PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET DATE July 3, 2003 ITEM # 5 PROJECT NUMBER RZ 03-007 PROJECT NAME Schroeder Apartments NAME (PLEASE PRINT) FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL .~' ~~~ Ada County Highway District Sherry R. Huber. President ata Fact'37th Rtreet Susan S. Eastlake, 1st Vice President Garden City ID 83714-6499 Dave Bivens, 2nd Vice President Phone (208) 387-6100 David E. Wynkoop, Commissioner FAX (208) 387-6391 John S. Franden, Commissioner E-mail: tellusC~ACHD.ada.id.us June 25, 2003 ~`1 To: John T. Schroeder and Margaret M. Lezamiz RE~EIVEI~ 3786 S. Suntree Boise, Idaho 83706 JUN 2 7 2003 Subject: MCUP03-026/MRZ03-007 City Of Meridian Four unit multi family development and rezone City Clerk Office 921 West 2nd Street, north of Pine Avenue On June 24, 2003, the Ada County Highway District acted on your application for the above referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of approval and street improvements, which are required. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 208-387-6171 ~ncerely,~, J c Newton~~ Development Analyst Right-of-way & Development Services Planning Division CC: Planning & Development project file City of Meridian Construction Services Drainage Utilities Cook Design Studio H. John Cook 1111 S. Overland Road Boise, Idaho 83705 Treasure Valley Engineers Jerry Hastings 5680 E. Franklin Road, Suite 220 Nampa, Idaho 83687 j Ada County Highway District & Development Department Planning Review Division This application does not require Commission action and is approved at the staff level as of Tuesday, June 24, 2003. Tech Review for this item was held with the applicant on Friday, June 13, 2003. Please refer to the Attachment for appeal guidelines. Staff contact: Joyce Newton, 208-387-6171 phone, 208-387-6393 fax, jnewfon @achd. ado. id. us File Numbers: MCUP03-026-MRZ03-007/Four unit multi family development and rezone Site address: 921 West 2nd Street, north of Pine Avenue Owner: John T. Schroeder and Margaret M. Lezamiz 3786 S. Suntree Boise, Idaho 83706 Applicant: Cook Design Studio H. John Cook 1111 S. Overland Road, Suite 220 Boise, Idaho 83705 Representative: Treasure Valley Engineers Jerry Hastings 5680 E. Franklin Road, Suite 220 Nampa, Idaho 83687 Application Information: The Ada County Highway District (ACRD) staff has received the above referenced application requesting. conditional use approval to construct four multi-family units with attached garages. The existing single-family dwelling is to be removed. The site is located on the west side of 2"d Street approximately 128-feet north of Pine Avenue. The applicant is also requesting rezone approval for the site. Acreage: 0.17-acres Current Zoning: R-4 (Low Density Residential) Proposed Zoning: OT (Old Town District) Existing Use: Single Family Residential Proposed Use: Four Multi-Family Units with attached Garages Vicinity Map A. Findings of Fact Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 16 additional vehicle trips per day (10 existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. 2. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of a building permit. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. 3. Traffic Impact Study: This proposed development is estimated to generate less than 1,000-trips per day therefore a traffic impact study was not required with this application. 4. Site Information: There is an existing single-family dwelling with frontage on West 2"d Street and an unpaved alley. 5. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area: a. North: Meridian Elementary School b. South: Apartments/Single-Family Residential c. East: Single-Family Residential d. West: Alley/Single-Family Residential 6. Impacted Roadways Pine Avenue: Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: 2"d Street No Frontage Collector West of Meridian Road was 6,506 on 7/26/00 Better than "C" 30-mph Frontage: Approximately 58-feet Functional Street Classification: Local Traffic count: No current count available Speed limit: 25-mph Allev: Frontage: Approximately 58-feet Length of Alley: Approximately 186-feet 7. Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site Pine Avenue is a classified Collector roadway with 2-travel lanes, curb, gutter and sidewalk wrapping around onto 2"d Street. 2"d street is a local roadway with 2-travel lanes, no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. 2nd Street currently dead-ends with no turnaround and no access to the elementary school to the north. The alley dead-ends with no turnaround and no access to the elementary school to the north. The alley is currently not paved. 2 8. Existing Right-of-Way Pine Avenue has 70-feet of existing right-of-way (40-feet from centerline). 2"d Street has 60-feet of existing right-of-way (30-feet from centerline). The alley has 20-feet of right-of-way at the intersection with Pine Avenue tapering to 15-feet at the Meridian School District's parcel to the north of the development site. 9. Existing Access to the Site There is an existing residential driveway located at the terminus of West 2nd Street for the site. There is parking across the entire frontage and on both sides of the roadway. 10. Site History District staff has not reviewed this site as an application or prepared a report in the past year. 11. Other Development in Area On February 26, 2003, the Ada County Highway District Commission reviewed and approved MCUP03-006/MRZ03-003; the applicant was requesting rezone and conditional use approval for a daycare facility. The site is located on the northeast corner of Pine Avenue and 3`d Street. This application required Commission action because the staff was recommending a waiver of policy to not construct curb, gutter and sidewalk abutting the development site on 3`d Street for the following reasons. - West 3`d Street is a "dead end" street that is approximately one block in length with no chance of extension. Staff does not foresee the remainder of the neighborhood changing or redeveloping in the near future. - There is no current access to the Meridian Elementary School to the north of the proposed development site. The school has constructed a fence around the playground of the school and closes off any pedestrian or vehicular access from West 3`d Street. - There is an irrigation head gate located just north of the intersection for Pine Avenue and West 3`d Street (on the east side of W. 3`d Street) and an irrigation ditch that cannot be relocated that are in the way of the required improvements. - The curb, gutter and sidewalk that is located on Pine Avenue wraps around the corner of west 3'd Street, and the extension from this location would interfere with the above-mentioned head gate. - There is curb, gutter and sidewalk on Pine Avenue that continues from the development site north to the Meridian Elementary School located on 1~` Street and Meridian Road (2-blocks to the east of the proposed development site), providing pedestrian access from this site to the school. On April 16, 2003, MCUP03-006/MRZ03-003 was scheduled on the Commission regular agenda for an appeal at the request of a neighbor. The Commission action was to deny the appeal and the staff report was approved as written with the modification of policy. On May 20, 2003, the project was denied by Meridian's City Council. 3 12. Capital Improvements PlanlFive Year Work Program This location is not programmed into the District's current Capital Improvement Program and or Five Year Work Program for reconstruction or any roadway improvements. B. Findings for Consideration Right-of-Way District policy 7204.4.1 and Figure 72-F1A requires 50-feet of right-of-way on local streets. This right- of-way allows for the construction of a 2-lane roadway with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks. Weft 2nd Street has 60.feet of existing right-of--way, therefore the applicant should not be required to dedicate additional right-of--way with this application. However there is sufficient right-of-way for the required curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements. The applicant !s proposing to provide additional pavement and utilize a portion of right-of--way; approximately 22-feet in width and approximately 60.feet in length for driveway approaches to the attached garages and a landscape planter. In accordance with District policy the applicant should enter into a license agreement with the District for the additional pavement and the landscaping planter that are proposed within the existing right-of- way. An agreement must be approved prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Please contact the Right-of Way Division at 387-3271 for guidelines. The applicant is proposing to construct a landscape planter located at the terminus of West 2nd Street abutting the school site. There is currently a patch of weeds where the pavement ends and the school site begins; a 4-foot strip of ground was !eft over when the elementary school installed a chain link fence, the strip is not right-of-way and is not owned by the District. Should this landscape planter encroach in theright-of--way provide the District with a license agreement for the portion of the encroachment. 2. Sidewalk District policy requires 5-foot wide (minimum) concrete sidewalk on all local streets, except those in rural developments with net densities of one dwelling unit per acre or less (7204.4.7). The applicant is proposing to construct curb, gutter and sidewalk abutting the development site continuing to the center of West .Znd Street abutting the school site. The applicant is also proposing to extend the improvement abutting the apartment complex to the south of the development site. District staff is supportive of the addition of the improvements extending to the south, including the extension of curb and gutter to Pine Avenue. 3. Street Sections District policy 7204.4.2 states, "developments with any buildable lot that is less that 1.5-acres in size will typically provide streets having a minimum pavement width of 32-feet with curb, gutter and sidewalks. The total street width shall be 36-feet from back-of-curb to back-of-curb. Variations of this width may be allowed, depending on traffic volumes forecast to be generated by the development. Concrete sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5-feet in width unless they are separated from the curb 5- feet or more in which case the sidewalk shall be a minimum of 4-feet in width. 4 In accordance with District policy the ap~licant should construct curb, gutter, 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk and match paving on West 2n Street abutting the parcel. Improvements steal! be constructed to one-half of a 36-foot street section. 4. Stub StreetslNon-Continuous Streets/dead-ends, cul-de-sacs District policy 7205.5 requires stub streets to provide intro-neighborhood circulation and to provide access to adjoining parcels. Stub streets will conform with the requirements described in Section 7204.5, 7204.6 and 7204.7, except a temporary cul-de-sac will not be required of the stub street has a length no greater than 150-feet. A sign shall be installed at the terminus for the stub street stating "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". District policy requires temporary turnarounds with a temporary easement provided to the District at the end of stub streets. District policy 7205.2.1 requires the minimum radius permitted for a turnaround is 45-feet to back-of- curb is required. It is 42-feet where curb is not required. The District will consider alternatives to the standard turnaround on a case-by-case basis. The determination to allow anon-standard turnaround will be based on turning area, drainage, maintenance considerations and the written approval of the emergency fire service for the area where the development is located. Minimum design standards shall be met for all non-standard turnarounds. Submit a design of the turnaround for review and approval by District Development Division staff. Approval of the staff report does not indicate approval of the non-standard turnaround design. A standard cul-de-sac turnaround was not constructed at the terminus of West 2nd Street when the street was first constructed. As indicated on the site plan submitted with the application, the applicant is providing a fire vehicle turnaround over the parking area for the apartment complex located to-the south of the development site on West 2"d Street. Both parcels are under the same ownership. The applicant should provide the District with a recorded easement for the turnaround prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 5. Driveways District policy F2-F4 (1) and 72-F4 (2), requires driveways located on local residential roadways to offset a controlled and/or uncontrolled intersection a minimum of 50-feet (measured near edge to near edge). Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.9.1, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. District Policy 7207.9.3 restricts residential driveways to a maximum width of 20-feet. District policy 7207.9.3 restricts commercial driveways with daily traffic volumes over 1,000 vehicles to a maximum width of 35-feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as curb-cut type facilities if located on local streets. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways. 6. Alley District policy 7204.10.1 requires the dedication of additional right-of-way to obtain a minimum width from the centerline of the alley of 8-feet for residential uses and 10-feet for all other uses. 5 The District on a case-by-case basis will review dedication of additional right-of-way for the alley. The dedication of additional right-of--way will generally be required where it can be reasonably anticipated that other adjoining or nearby developments will also allow future dedications. The alleyway currently dead-ends at fhe elementary school to the north of the proposed development site. INlth the construction of the elementary school the alleyway can no longer be extended. Therefore fhe applicant should not be required to dedicate any additional right-of--way with this application. District policy 7204.10.2 states access is allowed to and from a fully improved alley. Parking which is entered from the alley shall be designed so the minimum clear distance from the back of the parking staff to the opposite side of the alley is 22-feet for perpendicular parking. An access to an alley shall be located a minimum of 25-feet from the nearest public street Parking in alley is not allowed (District policy 7204.10.3). District Policy 7204.10.3 states a minimum of bads-of-curb radius of 15-feet is required at all alley intersections. For the reconstruction of existing alleys, the back-of-curb radius may be less than 15- feetwhen it is impractical to remove existing obstructions. District Policy 7204.10.1 states if the proposed development is not a single family detached residence and it takes access from an alley, the developer will be required to pave the entire width of the right- of-way from the nearest public street to and abutting the development. The applicant should be required to reconstruct the alley intersection with Pine Avenue and pave the alley from Pine Avenue and abutting the site providing a turnaround at the terminus of fhe alley. The applicant should provide the District with a recorded easement for the turnaround prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The easement should be placed over the parking area. C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval Construct rolled curb, gutter, 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk and match paving on West 2"d Street abutting the parcel. The applicant is proposing to construct curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements from the frontage of the project to the centerline of West 2"d Street abutting the school site. Improvements shall be constructed to one-half of a 36-foot street section. 2. In accordance with District policy the applicant shall enter into a license agreement with the District for the additional pavement and landscaping planter within the right-of-way on West 2nd Street; the agreement shall encompass right-of-way approximately 22-feet in width and approximately 60-feet in length. An agreement must be approved prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Please contact the Right-of-Way Division at 387-3271 for guidelines. 3. As proposed on the site plan submitted with the application, the applicant shall provide a turnaround easement over the parking area for the apartment complex located to the south of the development site on West 2"d Street. The applicant shall provide the District with a recorded easement for the turnaround prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 4. Should the proposed landscape planter located at the terminus of West 2"d Street abutting the school site encroach into the right-of-way the applicant shall provide the District a license agreement for the portion of the encroachment. 6 5. Pave the entire width of the alley to the nearest street and abutting the parcel. 6. Reconstruct the alley intersection with Pine Avenue; the back-of-curb radius may be less than 15-feet when it is impractical to remove existing obstructions. Work with District staff for the radius. 7. Parking which is entered from the alley shall be designed so the minimum clear distance from the back of the parking stall to the opposite side of the alley is 22-feet for perpendicular parking. Parking in the alley is not allowed and shall be signed accordingly. 8. Provide a turnaround at the terminus of the alley with a recorded easement over the parking area to the District. The applicant shall provide the District with a recorded easement for the turnaround prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 9. Pave all driveway's and parking stalls that take access to West 2"d Street or the alley. Driveways and parking stalls shall be paved their full width as proposed on the submitted site plan and at least 30- feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of West 2nd Street or the alley. 10. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. D. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way. 2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 6. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 7. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #197, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least iwo full business days prior to breaking 7 ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACRD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. E. Conclusions of Law The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. Appeal Guidelines 8 Request for Appeal of Staff Decision Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual. a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply, and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. Appeal Guidelines 9 _. `~ __.. Q To: City Clerk City of Meridian Re: H. John Cook and John/Margaret Schroeder, Schroeder Apartments. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING OF SIGN COUNTY OF ADA ) ss: STATE OF IDAHO ) ~~C~, I~~~ ~''/Tl,/~N2'~ ~o ~`'/TIIC~ OF 3 Applicdr~'p~ ~E/.~/Q/ ~~~~N JOHN T. SCHROEDER, After first being duly sworn, deposes and states: 1. On Saturday, June 21, 2003, a sign in conformance with Meridian Ordinance 11-15-5 was posted on the property located at 921 West 2nd Street, Meridian, Idaho. Photographs of the sign are attached. The sign was posted according to the Ordinance, on the subject property, adjacent to 2nd street, perpendicular to the street, so that the sign can be easily observed. The sign was posted on the southeast corner of 921 West 2nd Street adjacent to 2nd Street. 2. The sign contained all of the information required by the Ordinance. The information on the sign contained: CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND 20NING COMMISSION THE CITY OF MERIDIAN will hold a public hearing on July 03, 2003, at 7:00 P.M. at the Meridian City Hall (33 E. Idaho) PURPOSE: Reviewing and considering the application of H. John Cook and John/Margaret Schroeder for a Rezone of .165 acres from R-4 to O-T zones for Schroeder Apartments. Furthermore, the applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to remove existing house and construct four apartments, two story with bedrooms upper level and four single garages attached to apartment structure for Schroeder Apartments. PROPERTY LOCATION: 921 West 2nd Street. APPLICATION BY: H. John Cook, architect and John/Margaret Schroeder Contact a City Planner at 884-5533 with any questions. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING OF SIGN AS REQUIRED BY MERIDIAN CITY Page 1 ~ - i Dated this 23rd day of June, 2003. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO Before .••- 9 B ~ ~. ;' 13 O Tq t4'Ay s .~~~.~x .,, ; AG ~ S BLIC ~# ~'9'F ~p ID A~~..~~~ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING OF SIGN AS REQUIRED SY MERIDIADT CITY Page 2 this 23rd day of June, 2003. Notary Public for Idaho Residing at Boise, Idaho Commission Expires: %a latQld~~3 ~ECEIVE~I y~'~J 2 3 2003 ~.:I 1Y (~F MERIDIAN ;17V C'I FRK f)FF[f`,~~ F~9 Z ~t ~ W LL t» ~ LL. N ~ O N W '~~" ~ ~~ --~ ~ UU ;~ John Schroeder Margaret Lezamiz 3786 S. Suntree Place Boise, Idaho 83706 ,b June 05, 2003 ~~ ~~ IVE D JUrJ 1 1 2003 Mr. Dave McKinnon City Of Meridian Ms. Kristy Vigil ~CityClerkOffice Planning & Zoning City of Meridian 660 E. Watertower, Suite 202 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Applications for Conditional Use Permit and Rezone Schroeder Apartments Dear Dave & Kristy: We enclose to you for filing the original Petition signed by absolutely all of our neighbors to our property at 921 West 2nd Street, Meridian, which is the property we are requesting a Conditional Use Permit and Rezone approval. Please file the original in your Planning & Zoning file for review by all, including the Commissioners. I enclose a copy to be conformed (as received) and returned to me in the enclosed envelope. If you have questions, please call. Thanks. JTS/j enc. As stated cc/w/enc. John Cook, Architect Mark Grindstaff, Architect Jay Clow/J & J Construction-General Contractor ,,~, Re: John Schroeder's proposed 4 townhouses for 921 West 2nd, Meridian Date: December 13, 20D2 We understand that John Schroeder and his Wife Margaret have just purchased the home located at 921 West 2nd Street in Meridian. The current home at 921 West 2nd Street is a virtual eyesore and degrades the entire neighborhood. We have reviewed the site plan of John Schroeder's proposed re-development for 921 West 2nd Street in Meridian. We antnrove of the site plan for 4 townhouses, plus 4 garages, to be built at the 921 West 2nd Street address. Date ~~~~~ .a-14,8z //D.~ ~-f /y ~c ~ ~~~y/a -~ ~~~/3 Signature ~ ~~ MERIDIAN ARY SCHOOL 15~E~Ada• Q9,~ ~ wte,~-c~,1dn, sd, d~ ^ OF THE HO LARGE LOT LOCATID AT 230 W. PINE, ~` DIStECTLY BERING THE 4-PLE2{ AND BEHIND THE PROPOSID TOWNIIOUSE$ q~ ~. °-~ N ~~ ~I~ ~ ~~.~ %~~~~-' ~~--~~/ ~G l c~/ y ~®~ ~~~ ~~ ~ X31 ~ ~~ ~; ~ s 1-s f 1 , ~ ~~~~~~~n ~~ ~~ y -~'~ °~Co Re: To the City of Meridian, and Meridian Planning and Zoning. Date: December 12, 2002 Re: John Schroeder, and his proposed improvement to 921 West 2nd Street, Meridian, Idaho This Statement is made in support of John Schroeder's request to have the City of Meridian, and Meridian Planning and Zoning, approve his requested townhouses for 921 West 2nd. My husband and I have owned a home located at 914 West 2nd for many years. We have known John Schroeder since the mid-1980's when John purchased the 4-flex across the street from us. My husband, Kay, just passed away approximately 2 months ago. The home located at 921 West 2nd, which John is proposing to develope with townhouses, is also located across from our home. The home located at 921 West 2nd has been a virtual eyesore to our home, and our neighborhood for approximately 18 years. The home at 921 West 2nd has also been an attraction for less desirable activity and has many times caused us safety concerns. It is with great relief that we have learned that John Schroeder has been able to purchase the home located at 921 West 2nd. We are looking forward to John hopefully building the 4 nice townhouses, with garages that he proposes. John and his family take very good care of his 4-flex, as the City of Meridian already knows. John has been a very good neighbor. John has wonderful tenants who are good neighbors. John's 4-flex across the street has always been one of the nicer homes and buildings in our entire neighborhood. John's townhouses, if the City of Meridian approves, will even be a better improvement to our neighborhood. I have seen a preliminary site plan of what John proposes. He has proposed 4 townhouses, with 2 garages on the West 2nd Street side, and 2 garages on the alley side. I strongly approve of the design and proposed site plan. It will work well with our neighborhood. I hope the City of Meridian, and Meridian Planning and Zoning will approve of what John and his Wife proposes. We have looked forward to having the very unsightly home at 921 removed for many years, and look forward to hopefully seeing nice townhomes, with garages, being built in its place. Thank you. r~ ~ '~n~, SSb- 3~~ April 04, 2003 I support John & Margaret Schroeder's proposal to build 4 very nice townhouses at 921 West 2nd in Meridian. It will be a wonderful project. I have seen the front elevations of the 4 townhouses and the site plan. ,/~/ ~ // 1/~ /1,/j ,~ Q /'/J~/l ~ 9.21 West 2nd Street (Tenant) Y V ~ " ' "`xxx--~~~CCC W'vv-(/ l Meridian, Idaho C.~'. ~ i ... t `~~ 1 4~ ALLEY ~ a --- 6®mm' I - iEry P ~I~~ ~ ; II D ~~ ~ .. r ~ I 96ID 1 p~ I 0 'i W I ~ ii ~ ~ ~-__~- s ---- ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~I Q - I ~` A '~ ' ----~-~- ~ i ~ I i ~3 ~ _-r_-~_ ~ s s no~ ~ ~ I ~ gym. ~P ~ ~ og' oDO~ I i~ D W FW g ~ bD ~ II ' - - ---y----- ~mmm Y -ar---------- wESt a~ 6tREEt 1 1 O I i @_ ~ I D a 1 0 0 -• i -~ -- ~ ~ Q D ~ O O ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ® N - c ~ Q i Z ~ U , ~ ~ n lI i Q n ' ° I JO F e p _ ~ m 3 ~ < n -o D ~ E O o i ~ ~ _ m im 3 I P x m R ~~ p ~, ,,,~. FhzELmlNArar coNCEPr h ~vISED: ~xnv~ PRELIMINAR7 CONCEPT PLAN Or 12n®/®] by MC. second floor plan f l r e t F l o o r p l a n SEGOND FLOG ~'f4 aq. ft FIRS? FLOO~564 eq. ft BLDG. ArgA:__II3B eq. fl.. Re: John and Margaret Schroeder's proposed 4 townhouses for 921 West 2nd, Meridian We understand that John Schroeder and his Wife Margaret have just purchased the home located at 921 West 2nd Street in Meridian. The current home at 921 west 2nd Street is a virtual eyesore and degrades the entire neighborhood. We have reviewed the site plan of John Schroeder's proposed re-development for 921 West 2nd Street in Meridian. We anvrove of the site plan for 4 townhouses, plus 4 garages, to be built at the 921 West 2nd Street address. Date Sig at re d Address -- - - ' Jy ~ ~ ~ 5~ o ?~ ~c~ ~ Gee - ~~ ~ ~.~ . ~~~ ~~ y~ c ~~~ -~~3 X03 ~~.2~%~~, b97 a„-~f..__. ~ ~ - ~Z=D3 l- J~ov.,-o-. l' Iiyv v r'~ 35 ~ • r~~ / 6~ lIT+V-~G ~~~~ Ocrzy~~ VY~OhI~ I~mc,+-~ ~ -lz-o3 t~ t¢ ~~ ~3 ~ ~• P~ ~ Q !3 (y.7 • Znd ~2. ~3 ~v~i.~~T s 2vs~.~ ~~~~7° Re: John and Margaret Schroeder's proposed 4 townhouses for 921 West 2nd, Meridian We understand that John Schroeder and his Wife Margaret have just purchased the home located at 921 West 2nd Street in Meridian. The current home at 921 West 2nd Street is a virtual eyesore and degrades the entire neighborhood. We have reviewed the site plan of John Schroeder's proposed re-development for 921 west 2nd Street in Meridian. We approve of the site plan for 4 townhouses, plus 4 garages, to be built at the 921 West 2nd Street address. Date 3 S~~ 2 2~ /~~aG~~~~ ~ -~, - d ~ ~~~a u/F~~. zo~.s~ 8' 360 ~ and Address ~/s~~ C~ o0G°~~ Re: John Schroeder's proposed 4 townhouses for 921 West 2nd, Meridian Date: December 13, 2002 We understand that John Schroeder and his Wife Margaret have just purchased the home located at 921 West 2nd Street in Meridian. The current home at 921 West 2nd Street is a virtual eyesore and degrades the entire neighborhood. We have reviewed the site plan of John Schroeder's proposed re-development for 921 West 2nd Street in Meridian. We annrove of the site plan for 4 townhouses, plus 4 garages, to be built at the 921 West 2nd Street address.. Date _~~// ~~ .a-~¢,~z ~~~~a.~ ~_,~y~~, j/y~ ~~~~3 ~il~(o~ Signature ~, ,/L M-ERIDIAN SCHOOL is~E~Ad~. ~y,~ • wLer~.~an, rd, F THE H LARGE LOT LOCATID AT 230 W. PINE, ~ DI$ECTLY BERING THE 4-FLEX AND BEHII~ID THE PROPOSID 'ICTv~NHOUSF$ ~~ ~. ~.~'~,~ ~~~a ~g.a~a~ I ' Uri ~~~'~ J r~ 7~~~~~-~ ~, ., "~6 ~. ~ ~ ct .. -l--' l i+,~,~.L:. W G/ )T ~ nr JJ~V.~ - Y~~'~!tr,y s .:ter--'~_, ~~C'i~~~~~;r~ ~ N~ Re: To the City of Meridian, and Meridian Planning and Zoning. Date: December 12, 2002 Re: John Schroeder, and his proposed improvement to 921 West 2nd Street, Meridian, Idaho This Statement is made in support of John Schroeder's request to have the City of Meridian, and Meridian Planning and Zoning, approve his requested townhouses for 921 West 2nd. My husband and I have owned a home located at 914 West 2nd for many years. We have known John Schroeder since the mid-1980's when John purchased the 4-flex across the street from us. My husband, Kay, just passed away approximately 2 months ago. The home located at 921 West 2nd, which John is proposing to develope with townhouses, is also located across from our home. The home located at 921 West 2nd has been a virtual eyesore to our home, and our neighborhood for approximately 18 years. The home at 921 West 2nd has also been an attraction for less desirable activity and has many times caused us safety concerns. It is with great relief that we have learned that John Schroeder has been able to purchase the home located at 921 West 2nd. We are looking forward to John hopefully building the 4 nice townhouses, with garages that he proposes. John and his family take very good care of his 4-flex, as the City of Meridian already knows. John has been a very good neighbor. John has wonderful tenants who are good neighbors. John's 4-flex across the street has always been one of the nicer homes and buildings in our entire neighborhood. John's townhouses, if the City of Meridian approves, will even be a better improvement to our neighborhood. I have seen a preliminary site plan of what John proposes. He has proposed 4 townhouses, with 2 garages on the West 2nd Street side, and 2 garages on the alley side. I strongly approve of .the design and proposed site plan. It will work well with our neighborhood. I hope the City of Meridian, and Meridian Planning and Zoning will approve of what John and his Wife proposes. We have looked forward to having the very unsightly home at 921 removed for many years, and look forward to hopefully seeing nice townhomes, with garages, being built in its place. Thank you. 7/~' ~ ~ ~. 1 I ~`~S~C/INYCi~. A '; ,.fi12QCcV J.l, April 04, 2003 i support John & Margaret Schroeder's proposal to build 4 very nice townhouses at 921 West 2nd in Meridian. It will be a wonderful project. I have seen the front elevations of the 4 townhouse/s~ andnthe site plan. I ,, n ,n/ I'// f//y/~~/~/~~~lQ,f~~~ 921 Nlest 2nd Street (Tenant) Y (""'"~ w V `w--[[ Meridian, Idaho ~// ~' r -~-----°-~'" ------------- I ~_ __ ~_ 1 i w ~- ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 s 3 3 g- g. ~~~_~ ~ y OD ~ n b }' V ~/ F ? 1~ n bD i ~- e ~ ~ pg~ O WpBT 2~ 6TR.g8T ~" k 360' s s~ ~36~~ tlID' 1 1 D m i P b 1 ~xp o I •~ g _ I r ~- 1 I O ® ~ e ° i~ ' A ~ N W c Q 1 I ~ I ~ D 1 O F ~ O I ~ y ~ N O m 3 I < ~ $ ' '° E o a b 0 i 1 1 ~ N' ~ ~ ~ i 3 ~ju m ~--- I ~ nm ~~~~~~. AOJ/lAY I~ 1 9 ~ e 1 m ~^a*pr Po a p® tl PRELIHMARY CONCEPT '1 REVI6ED_ ~tnve PRELIMINARY CONCEPT PLAN Q Rn0/G'1 by MG Beeond floor plan f i r s t f l o o r p l a n 6CALE: I/B' I' - 0' SECOND FLOOR~74 sq. rL FIR67 FLOC S64 sq. fi BLDG. AREA:-1138 eq. tt. ~ Y Re: John and Margaret Schroeder's proposed 4 townhouses for 921 West 2nd, Meridian We understand that John Schroeder and his Wife Margaret have just purchased the home located at 921 West 2nd Street in Meridian. The current home at 921 West 2nd Street is a virtual eyesore and degrades the entire neighborhood. We have reviewed the site plan of John Schroeder's proposed re-development for 921 West 2nd Street in Meridian. We approve of the site plan for 4 townhouses, plus 4 garages, to be built at the 921 West 2nd Street address. Date Sig at re d Address ~ ggg- 3:~9 ~ ~~3 dos ,v. w. t s~- ~?~F~~„~ ~ ;., G %~ ~° ~/ /~ y~ ~-(~ -0 3 / 4 S !/°v - l// ~' U~rJ /rG4~ a ~h~~ I~mc~ ,~~ _ '~-1z-o3 ~~ r~sC ~~6~/z - 12 -a3 x(13 (~• Znd ~ s~ ~- /2. v3 v~ l.~'~-~ S 2~~~.~ ~:- ~~~ ~- ~/~~ ~ ~,,~~ ~~ ~ ~ sue) ~~v • 'v- 3h ~. d~-~ Re: John and Margaret Schroeder's proposed 4 townhouses for 921 West 2nd, Meridian We understand that John Schroeder and his Wife Margaret have just purchased the home located at 921 West 2nd Street in Meridian. The current home at 921 West 2nd Street is a virtual eyesore and degrades the entire neighborhood. We have reviewed the site plan of John Schroeder's proposed re-development for 921 West 2nd Street in Meridian. We approve of the site plan for 4 townhouses, plus 4 garages, to be built at the 921 West 2nd Street address. Date ~~: ~~s~~ ~~ ~~:~ ~~ 2 and Address ~/s~~ MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE COUNCIL MEMBERS WILLIAM L.M. NARY KEITH BIRD TAMMY DE WEERD CHERIE MCCANDLESS RURAL F[aE COMMISSIONERS RICHARD GREENE TERRY LE[GHTON STEVE ELLIOTT r~ "IIY OP ~~~^' ^':)rAHO j ~~ rr f~, M?';RIDIA6] CITY ~RLRA1:~ . TRI~ I ~ 3F~'TM;tim June 10, 2003 JUN 10 2003 i;ity O£Moridian City Clerk Office TO: Mayor, City Council and the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Joseph Silva, Deputy Chief, Fire Prevention SUBJECT: Schroeder Apartments CUP 03-026, RZ 03-007 The following will be the requirements and/or concerns to provide minimum levels of fire protection for the proposed project: 1. Commercial occupancies will require afire-flow consistent with the Uniform Fire Code to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 400' apart. 1997 UFC Appendix III-A An additional Fire Hydrant will be required to be installed at West Second and Pine. 2. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Water Department. 3. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department. The proposed fire hydrant locations will be submitted to the Public Works for plan review. 4. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required before combustible construction begins. UFC 901.4.2 & 901.3 I;HIEE KEN W. BOWERS DEPGTY CHIEF -FIRE PREVENTION JOSEPH SILVA DEPUTY CH1EF - TRAMING BILL JOHNSON SJO Easi Franklin Road Meridian l,D 8364? (203184b 12~~1 I'',i~ 1'_04 Sbi fl i?fI - ~,~CEI1J 5. The phasing plan may require that any roadway greater than 150' in length that is not provided with an outlet shall be required to have a turn around. Approved as submitted. MAYOR Robert D. Cowie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy de Weerd William L. M. Nary Cherie McCandless LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 46G-9272 • FAX 46G-0405 PARKS & RECREATION (208) BBB-3579 • Fax 898-5501 PUBLIC WORKS (208) 898-5500 • Fax 887-1297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 867-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Kei[h Bird ,„ ~Tnensu~+eV ieoa PLANNING &ZONING (208) 884-5533 • Faz 888-G854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: June 26, 2003 Transmittal Date: May 20, 2003 Hearing Date: July 3, 2003 File No.: RZ 03-007 Request: Rezone of .765 acres from R-4 to O-T zones for Schroeder Apartments By: H. John Cook Location of Property or Project: rr ~„4._ qr CITY OF 1+~~: " Ci~eri~i~n ll IDAHO 927 West 2nd Street David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR VAC, FP) Jerry Centers, P2 (No VAR, Vac, FP) Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Keith BoILp, P!Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Robert Come, Mayor Bill Nary, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C KeRh Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP) Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department RECENED MAY 2 3 2p03 City of Meridian City Clerk Office Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FPiPP ~~ty) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian brig. Distdct Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP Doty) U.S. West (FPrPP only) Intermountain Gas (FPiPP ~~ty) Bureau of ReGamation (FP/PP only) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County (Annexation only) Ada County Land Rewrcls (FP/PP Dory) Meridian Development Corporation Historical Preservation Commission G Remarks: 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 Human Resources Fax (208) 8848723 Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 JUL-3-2993 11:46R FROM:Sanitara Services, I 298-E88-5052 FAX COVER SHEET Sanitary Service Company P.O. Box a2s Meridian, ID. 8388D Phone: (Qp9}888.3999 TO: ./'~ ~iGLG~17W« CCMPANY:._ ~ rr Z FA)( NUMBER: Cor'nm~ants: T0: 8886854 P:1~2 ~C~- '~~D ~ 3 2003 C~oF~,h~L~v Fax: (208}~8*88~-5~05~2~ /~ FROM: -~ s;~~'u' 'rc'®'tr.~ PAGES SENT: !Z DATE: -7 / 3~c~3 ~~~ ~ L~~mv~ ~~~5 ~ -~~ere Q~~ Q y QU~S'~atiS. ~.~~~~ .Yti. SUL-3-2GJa3 11:46q FROM:Sanitara Ser~ices~ I 28B-86B-SG52 m \ n o sy, S o A ~i_ ~, z L7 ~~ ~~ p 4 ~'a P ~. '$ ~~~g§ iF ~a§ B -~~ ;'~ ~g is. §: '~ ~~ ~~ I§ ~ ~ f;~~ e ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ s - ~ It y.±! P H D -i r I~ m r a Z m C m v z a` ~" a ; ~~~"` f '" `~~ ~ n ~~ Fc~- ' ~ ..~~ ~ Q r ~, ~ _ 0 ~. ~--. s 9 n R n ~~ ~€ ~------- i 1 I I 1_ _ _ ._ ~"_~ oJ~ w ~ `. ` ~ ~3 w M r P ~ ~ ° ~ T ((''~~ s, 1 £ A C ~ r ~~ ~f- S s 0 6~ ~ o '~ 1 S _ ~ ~~ n _S ~ R ~~ ~ ~ N < ~ ( h ~ ~ ~ ', ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ A ~~ f `~ t{ ~ _~ ' R F e 5 ~~~~~ G - 2J°I ~ ©3 T0: 8886854 P:2~2 i aP a i~ ~~ ~~ ~< R 6 A r ~~~~: o 7~ "F j$a n $ FM ~A A ~ ~ysa ~ e a L i5 ~F =a X F~ r Y~ A o Ff d i L A~ su ~~ a ~ g 8~ ~~~~ g P - ~~ 4 ~~ m a ~ ~ ~~~ Is C I °s,ai I, 5 a n m n 1 C D r m .r a D b Z g~ ~ 3 (/1 m v ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~~ X m Io A ~O UZ r''! D i AmY Qu n 0 0 r ~~ ~- ~?~O ~I~aIO ~?D SGHF~OF~Ef'~ ~ - PL.E)[ ue?PuaIK30 ~?~ ~-za-o3 £OOZ £ 0lnf L v II------------~ ~ I ~z I D _NZ ~ m {i ~ ~ m !` ~ I A m I m X L _ O m_ i A CI~11I~~~~I ~~ I -_, __~ ~ --- --c-. prb.._. 116-- _Ilb.... N.p-.. "\ ...-a Y c5n _ __.~_.. I 0 I I _ O d I ~ _ _ ~ - _ . -- ~~-EV_'_-Th _...2a .'__ cv---. fr .._-~ - v ~ .: m R --.er-n'+.v.. I _.._._ {r-- ... m I ~1'(~o6DE~e ~. _ P~~c ~-29-3