Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutChateau Meadows East FP IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number Dated: August 13, 1990 Expiration Date: August 13, 1991 (at our counters) Gentlemen: A. Leon Blaser and BrucWW:e~Iyaserabli~sF~ our Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit in your favor for the account of Teresa A. Blaser & Annalee H. Blaser up to the aggregate amount of$ *12, 000.00* available by your drafts drawn at sight on us at the address below and bearing the following clause "drawn under Key Bank of Idaho Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit number '1''"7O dated August 13, 1990 ;~ The amount of each draft must be endorsed thereon and be accompanied by the following documents: Certified signed statement that the developer has defaulted and failed to perform the completion of the sewer, water, and street lights, as required in the construction of Chateau Meadows East No. 2 Subdivision, more particularly described in the legal description attached. We hereby engage with you that all drafts drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this credit will be duly honored if drawn and presented for payment at this office on or before the expiration date of this credit. Very Truly Yours, Key Bank of I aho by; ~ -~7 title P.O. Box 2800 Boise, ID 83701 address PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO THE CREDIT Except as otherwise expressly stated herein, this credit is subject to the "Uniform Customs and Practices for Documentary sits (1983 revision), the International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 400;' or by subsequent Uniform Customs and c: KEY BANK OF IDAHO ~~]C~Q~DQ~ C~QC~D~4 Two ce fixed by subsequent Congress of the International Chamber of Commerce. INT~I~~XI~~ST FINI~NCII~I~ June 14, 1990 Mayor Grant Kingsford City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Mayor Kingsford: I received a letter dated 8 June 1990 from Gary D. Smith, P.E. The City Engineer, regarding extending East Chateau Drive to the East boundary of Subdivision No.2. This change to the approved preliminary plat, I believe, was precipitated by a conversation between Albert E. Blaser, my father, and the Woods family. I wish to point out that Albert Blaser has no financial interest in the Chateau Meadows development whatsoever. Any conversations, allegations, etc between Albert E. Blaser and the Wood family were carried on by Mr. Blaser for his own account and interest. It is the intent of Interwest Development to develop the Stucker property in an orderly manner specified in the purchase agreement with Stucker, page 4 section I reads: Development of the approximate 53 acre parcel shall be orderly and sequential and shall begin on the Southern _ _ Boundary and progress North until all ground has be developed. Outside of the contract but part of the agreement between Interwest Development Corp. and the Stuckers is that the ground south of the Downey Lateral be developed before any ground North is platted, and that is the intent of Interwest. Interwest does not now .own the ground for the Eastwardly extension of Chateau Street. The legal description for the purchase of Phase IIA describes that ground (24 lots) as shown in the preliminary plates approved by the City of Meridian. Ground outside this boundary is still owned by the Stuckers. 3350 llmericann Terrace Boise, Idaho 83'Z06 Phone (`ZO8) 385-0558 Finally, the cost for 100' of sewer and water, land acquisition, irrigation work, and the additional engineering has not been budgeted. Phase I and Phase IIA are carrying additional sewer and water costs. With no late comers agreement this additional burden I feel, is not just. If the Woods want the sewer and water at this the ground from the Stuckers (I'll relinquish roadway right of way) and let them put it in. willing to do this, then as demand drives lot phases will be brought on line and the road will be extended to the Wood property. ely, O'y~-c A. Leon Blaser, President Interwest Development Corp. time, let them buy the option for the I f they are not sales, additional sewer and water) OFFICIALS JACK NIEMANN, Clty Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Worka Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney EARL WARD, Watts Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire CAlef BILLGORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, City Engineer June 8, 1990 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone 888433 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor hr. Leon Blaser. Interpeet Development, Inc. 3350 Americana Terrace Boise, Idaho 83706 RE: Chateau Meadops East No. 2 - E. Chateau Drive Dear Mr. Blaser: COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA J. E. BERT MYERS ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON Chairman Zoning & Plannlny JIM JOHNSON I have visited pith ?layor Kingsford concerning the question of extending E. Chateau Drive to the east boundary of subdivision No. 2. The Mayor feels the full pidth of E. Chateau right of pay should be dedicated. by the plat. to the east subdivision boundary. He also feels the pater and seper lines should be extended to the east boundary, hopever, the pavement. curb. gutter and sidepalk need not be constructed until the phase north of subdivision No. 2 is platted. The extension of the pater and seper lines is in accordance pith City Ordinances, Chapter 1. Section 5-140 (Water line Development) and Chapter 5. Section 7-527 (Seger line Extension). Si cerely, Gary D. Smith. P. E. City Engineer c. c. File City Clerk David Collins. PE/LS MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 3, 1990 PAGE # 2 • Wayne Williamson, 337 Eagle Glenn, Eagle, Id. Williamson was sworn by the City Attorney: Williamson: We purchased this property back in 1977, supposedly it was zoned for three six plexes, we recently went throughgetting the necessary signatures for an application for a PUD for 5 triplexes & one single family dwelling, at the Pla]1n;ng & Zoning Hearing we had several people who objected to this use, so we withdrew that request and we would like to now have a PUD for six single fa¢nily dwellings. The lots are over 6000 square feet and the narrowest is 50 feet. I think you might have a diagram of what is planned. We would meet all the requirements of the City and other agencies. Giesler: Mr. Williamson, the main canplaint of the neighbors before was because of the triplexes? Williamson: Yes, they were talking about a lot of added traffic and they thought it could devalue their property. Mayor Kingsford: Anyone else fran the public who wishes to offer testimony? There was no response. The public Hearing was closed. The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Tolsma to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as prepared for the Planning & Zoning Cainnission: Notion Carried: Roll Call Vote: Yerrington, Yea: Giesler, Yea: Myers, Yea: Tolsma, Yea: The Notion was made by Giesler and seconded by Yerrington to approve the Conditional Use Permit for a PUD for six single faanily units for Wayne & Mary Williamson with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law: Notion Carried: All Yea: It~n #3: Final Plat on Chateau Meadows East #2: Mayor Kingsford: Any Questions of the Council, does the City Engineer have any additonal camtents? City Engineer: I visited with the developers engineer today and he concurred with my catments. The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Yerrington to approve the Final Plat on Chateau Meadows # 2: Motion Carried: All Yea: It~n #4: Findings of Fact On Variance Request by Boesiger, Inc.-for the Vineyards Subdivision: Mayor Kingsford: Council Nleinbers you have those Findings, are there any questions you would like to ask? The Motion was made by Yerrington and seconded by Myers that the City Council of the City of Meridian does hereby adopt and approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions as prepared on the Variance Request by Max Boesiger, Inc. Notion Carried: Roll Call Vote: Yerrington, Yea: Giesler, Yea: Myers, Yea: Tolsma, Yea: i ~ INTERWEST DEVELOPMF~i' CORPORATION FINAL PLAT: CHATEAU MEAOWS # 2 COMMENT S 1: Central District Health: Can approve with central water & sewer: 2. Nampa Meridian Irrigation: Ali laterals & waste ways must be protected, drainage must be retained on site.; Jackson Stub Drain .starts at the northwest .corner of this proposal, right-a--way must not be encroached upon. The right-a-rway is 60' overall, 30 from center both ways. Jackson Stub Drain wiil not accept municipal surface drainage. 3: Street Names approved by Street Name Committee;. some problem with the numbering of lots blocks. 4: City Engineer: See Attached: 5: Sewer Department: Included in Engineers ccx~unents. 6: Building Deptarment: No objections; I b'D .~ ~ ~ ~ i ... ro . ~~ P~ ~C ~~ ~. r g -+~ Fr i-+ ~~ C..' ,.. ~'~ • iii iiiiii ii s ~~ ~~~~~~~ awl ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~t ~ ~~Sr N ~p~ ~p~ ~ 1P w 3 ~r v R ~ m M p w Oo "~ ^ -pp'~ a ~c M o F ~ a ~. ~. ~ ,. ~. -~ R A _~ ~, ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ vo ~n vd S ~ ~ RI d1 ¢ .~,~ ~ ~ Fr ~ ~ •• q,, ~ ~ z ~ 3 ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~S F ~ a D ~ ~v 0~ w ~ ~A s' s= ~ I ~ % a a - o -1 v ~ ~ t ~ O r ~. N 0 v z_ 3 ~ ~S N~~ ~. a ~~ a +.D T ~ ~ N N ~ 91 '~ ~ ~, y n~ q T R _ a ~ N ~- f A -~- ,, s v 0 9 N~ ~ fl p ~° d T t ~ n ~ ,,,~, T o. ~J~ 9 _ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~'o ~ ~ ~~ 3 - ~ w 'f" f y A z [~ ~ m~ O ~ two ~ .. S !- ~ K ~j ~ ~ M _ ~ ~. ~f 'yam ~ N ~ h+ 1'* m H ~"C hrJ •--~ ~ .: w ~.~~! gn $ ~,' ~ E y.. ~ fY ~ ~ ( ~ a. H p.~ ~J A+ i ~ "__ ~j _;~; .. ~~ g ,r. ~ ~ - ~ ~ .. ~. ~ _~ R v w r to O .~ i~ H ro .. N 1-~ 0 v yN Z MM~ K 1-1 r w W ~p~~ 7 R • N • • CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION 1455 North Orchard Boise, Idaho 83706 REVIEW SHEET Return to: Boise _ Rezone # Eagle _ Conditiona Viridian _ Prelim;nar final Short Plat Kuna ~~ ~~/t7~`!/ f'I,Eif'l~Dl~jr ~;S`c' ~ Z ACZ .~i/7~ w cSr' 1. We have no objections to this proposal. 7~/NAa~~4L . 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. 3. _ Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comnent on this proposal. 4. _ We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can corm~ent. 5. _ We will require more data concerning the depth of (high seasonal ground water)(solid lava) from original grade before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal. 6. _ We can approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located (2,4) feet above solid lava layers. 7. ~ We can approve this proposal for: Central sewage Interim sewage Individual sewage ~ Community sewage system and t/Central water Individual water _ Community water well. 8. '~ Plans for Central sewage Comurninity sewage system Sewage dry lines, and '~C,entral water _Community water mn~st be submitted to and approved by the Regional Health and Welfare Environmental Services Field Office. 9. / Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 10. _ 'This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water. can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. 11. _ If restro~n facilities are to be installed then a sewage syst~n MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. 12. _ We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any (food establi_shment)(beverage establishment)(swimming pools or spas)(grocery store). 13. Reviewed by Date ~~ ~~i ~;~.. ro ~~ "~ . ~~ ~c ~~ . ~ '~ ~~ ~. ~r r ~~ My Noy C w M ~ K~ P~ !~+ i~j b W+ d K d D R O -~ r• ~ . f+• .~ ~. ~ a ~ n ~ ~ ~ r. ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ c ai ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ;~ ~' rt ~' "' ~ ~ ~ a+ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~rt ~~• m ro o~ w rr r N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v~ ~~ .~ ~ ~ ~ C O ~ ~ ~ b ~ fD p r• w r, N c., f7 r-~ x~y o n w r• w a' m m p E x w ~ ~ cn n r • rn r-~ n ~ H G ~ r~ G m r• ~ G G ~ cs. cn p cn n r• hi rt o rt rn w ~ ° rt ~ ~ a ~ ~ o w m ~ N w A. vi n ~ r• `C b r• w rt Qp rt p r• fD ~ w w r• rt G 0 o o ~' ~ r• m ~C G ~ ri n ~' ~ • ~ ~ d w b ~ m G' w rt rt m rt o ~ w rt n n ~ r• f'] m rt N o' n o G m m rt ~ ~ ~ r i, w b w rt rt n w ~ w o m rt r• rt I G' G fD w a ro ro n 0o n a rt o w ~ m In r• O O p. • ~ ~ ~ w rt 0o R" cn ~ E r• 9 • (D rt F-' fA (D I--~ rt iii 8;€~a ¢~~~§ ~ W ~ d ~ f'r ~ ~ 1•+ ~ ~ A! ~ 4 ~ n A ~ ~ ~ n ~~ o rr • -~ ~---- .} :`~ ; •; k~ ~ • a - . ~ u ~~~4 ~ ^ m t°'-- s `;~ ~... F..: :-APE >..+. „__ ~ «~ i ~~~` '0 . a.~ H W to O N F~ ~o O ~ ~i m ~ ~ ~ .. o ~, n '~ ~ ~ µ •. j p '~I ["~ ~ ~J ~ w ~ fj ~ t N ~ ~i f'r ~C C~7 •~j '~ n G' 0~ ~ ~ ~ hi ~ 'C Q ,,. ~ ~ ~ ~QQ ~ K ~' H o ~ Z ~ C ~ M ~ y H d ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ g ~ crt ~* ffin N v f•+ ~Z n H N r iC W W d rr . H ~~ ~~I I ( I I ~ ( I I I I ( I I I I r.~.. r ~ ~:. n ~ ~ a a ~ ~ ~o~.~ ~ ~f o ~t r• ~ •~ ~ ri a µ ~ w ~ r Oro ~ rt ~• ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n n r• w R £J p ~ ~ K C. N R+ ~ fh g fm't ~ 7 9 ~ ~ N ~3! !-+ ~ R •' ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ • M~ yelp w ~ ~ rr ~ >E -' ~ ~ R ~+. ~+ v l/ v ~ ~ • ~~ ~~ ~--- H M K • r~zc~ ~ a ~~ Htyy • • m ~ O' N ~ rt Q0 fD R~ fD n b G H ~' ~' r n w H h--' rt i-i ~ z ro rt~ o N ~ n b ~ O ~ i i, m d cn ~ n ~ w ~ ~ , w w a s H H W O rt R'~ `~ ~ ~ n ~ m a n i ~ ~t r• ~ £ sv r• £ w m w o r• o ~ w ~* n G p a ~ ~ rt a rn • ~ G (D ~'i H A~ N A~ ~t n A.~ H,~ G r• r• W rt N rt p O QQ ~ fD fD O H rt W O iy G ,..1 i"i fD rt £ O rt ~'1 p r• n w o n ~' r• ~ m w ~ m ~ a cr rt d rt w G ~ fD 0 ~ ~. ~ N O t7 ~ rt I rt ~• f~ O r'i W ~'t ri d r• o0 0• w O G r• n o m o w ~~ rt l1~ n ri rt • b ~h ]' ~S n fD fD O r• o rD A. rn n f? rt rt ~ G r+ n r,, b a' ~ rr rS o r ~ ~ w a ~ • rt b ~, ~' H O m d mambo ~o ro 0 0 N O F-' rt O rY G b fD ~ fD ~t rj I ( I I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ pp m h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O • - ~o r-- 4 a - ~ _ p ~~• ti - ~ _ f '" ~ R ~: .~ ~; , H 8 H r W r lG 1~ [~i •• K N o/ O n ~ ~ r~ ~ d .1 ~g r• ~ • ~i ft [iJ~ -••1 r ~p H K, ~ ~~ ~ F, R ~ ~TJ ~. ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ :y ~ ~ ^ ~ ~"~ °' g ~ ~ r a' ~ ~ ro ~ w H ~ ~ a n y ~, a ~ ~ g ~ ~~ ~O SUB~VISION EVALUATIO~SHEET ' (Recommendations only!!) ~; ~ Proposed Development Name ~ ~ CitY --~12Y'i~i-aq Date Reviewed 3/15/90 Preliminary Stage) Final XXX D e veE a p n-+ a,,~..~° Engineer/Developer Collins Engr./Interwest 6~i~ Date Sent The following SUBDIVISION NAME is approved by the Ada County Engineer or his designee per the requirements of the IDAHO STATE CODE. X . .Date The Street name comments Zisted below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. _Th.e followin4 existing street names shall appear on the plat as: "N. LOCUST .GROVE ROAD" "E. CHATEAU DRIVE" "E. MEADOW WOOD STREET" "F_ GRFFN MEADOW DRIVE" "N _ I O('HNFSS l,IAY" ThP f~llnwin9 nPw ctrPPt names arP aTRroved and shall anoear nn the plat as: "N_ MEADOW ROSE PIACF" "N_ I AIIf;HRTD~F AVFNIIF" `.~ ~ ~M1G~-~ f~~~.f~.- act t`.~-~~'~ ~-I~~LU Za~~~F~ ~:s~~!c:E.S .~~.~~=.~ VJr~c~~ ~1~Ft~AT'ia~ ~~~ ~,~.,4~.~, ~D ~ t-~~~~'F4,~.~.~. M~Arx~w ~sE The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency rep resentatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. -ALL of-the signatures must be secured by the representative or his ignee in order for the street names to be officially approved ,~ ADA COUNTY STREET NAP1E COMPSIZTEE, GENCY/REP E s9TIVES OR DESIGNEES . d ~, .-Z Ada County Engineer John Priester ~ -~ ~ -~~-~.~=!i. Date ~5 ~~ Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Raynor to ~~ r~ Local Fire Dept. Representativ"e Date NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat wi1Z not be signed !!!! Sub Inde Street Index Map ~~ ~.~d bE b I ucE 3, y-4~,e~~ r e n c.t.m ~ e,-~ NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS no 1 v~ landscape lot, LOCUST GROVE, do s not need l.ot number l 3 ~ ~~ ~-~/ Cask ~ ` ;~- ~_ ~ i ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ b'~ ~ ~ n ~ pr pp~~ r* ~ cn R 7 ~ ~ ~ 7 7 1't ~ ~ ~ R ~~CC ~ ~° n ~ a o0 3~ ~ • n rS :3 N+ f.. PS W IT "G .~ ~ ~ ~ ~~-+ rt s ~ ~ ~• ~ 9 m o r* N ih ~+• ft+ • 1'r 7 • g ~B w a~ t7 '~ ~+ ~r ~'- ~-r ,.~ R' ~ ~ a ~, m ~o ~ w ~ rt ~ ~ ID ~jW F~-~ Q Pr ~O rt '~a ~ a ~~ v ~ ~ r• ~ .~ ~"~ ~ ~ g ~ `" v 0 yMy li K A •! b A b eh .. H .'! A 1-r a A a H .~! 09 ~s W C7 p Q • .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ r- ~ f+ bl~ 4 p IP fA N ~ rS ~C fD H 8 ~~~I, C'' W i--' l0 O ' ~ n gy ~ ~'~ p ~p ~ M ~ p.r ~=- m ~ H `G W • ~ ~ r. ~ 4'~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ Z ~ ~ pp ~ C H n ~' .. e7 H ~ a g"'j N H p y K o ~ ~ ?7 ~ r K N F-' ~o lfl O K ~~ H v N (7 N H r w ~W r{ ~+ rt . ~., ~~ iii ~.~.. ~i ~i ~~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ P W ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~7 ~ R ca d ''C F- F~+~ ~ K n v ~ r* o n pcr, m • f7 ~ a ~~-' ~ ~ 7 w ~ ~p rr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n a~ C~C r~ g ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ K H. ~ b ~_ ~ r ~ ~ •• ~ W 'C1 ~ w rr r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ " ~ ~ ~~ ~v~ ~" - ~ ~ ~` v ~~ ~~ i i i i i i i i ~ m f'- ~ ~ ~ rt ~ M 9 r m ~ o, ~• ca O R ~, ~` H 8 r .. d ~ •• °' W ~ N O pp I--' lD O ~n w ~ ~ Fyj ~ A ~ '~ f"r CTJ III~~~ ~ Iyw ~ N• ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Rp H-+ H ~ ('~ ~+ '~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ Oi-' i rt o~ r- v •• ~i ~ N k ~3 N r W W ~ a~ ~ R M ~~ ~~~~Illlll~rl I II lillll~l I Illiill r•~.. ro~~ rt~"~ ~~~~~rt~~~~ ~~~ ~~° ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ m ~a ~ ~ n ~v a a ~ ~ +~_ m ~ c~ ~ rt ~ ~ ~ cr a oo a ~° n n a m ro ~ n m n~ a • f•1 ~ ~ N w r- n ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~' W ~ rt r. •• ~ a ~ n a' o g ~ ~ a, ~ ~ ~ f~D ~ O K t~xp r- ~ A frA fD rt C~ ~ ro r f~D ~ ~O a a v fD rr n 7 rt n ~ r v a F- rt r. .-. ~ n m ~D r• r• rt rt r- m a+ '~ rr, ~ rmr p ~ ] R ~ ~ a ~• ~ ~ ~ a~ a ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. a+ a ~ ~ rt ~ ~ r• H m o a ~ `t ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ o v ~ " ~ ~- r ~~ ~ ~~ v ~ ~ •• v ~ .. W ~ N O p~ I--' tD O v [~ ~ i•~ ~ m o n .. H n ~ ~ ~ a n ~ ~p ~ y ~ ~ ~ O tD Z i"~+ y ~~ ~ y u' ~n ~ ~ ~ e ro ro ~~pp pp ~ ~ A O A ~ ~7 Z ~ H G ~Hy ro r ~ ~ ~ .. t1 N ti W y G7 Fr y~ ~ ti fl+ ~ ~ .. ~ .~ K ~ ~ v o ~ ',,, i ollins ngineering " ompany, Inc. 1365 N: Orchard, Suite 305 Boise, Idaho 83706 (208) 377-9001 28 February 1990 Mayor and Councilmen e/o The City Clerk The-City Of Meridian Meridian,-Idaho Dear Sirs, Submitted herewith is the written application for -final plat approval_of Chateau Meadows East No.2 along with; 1.)27 folded copies of the final plat, 2.) Ten 300 scale prints of the final plat, and 3.) a check for the $390.00 review fee ( 39 building lots).- With each 300 scale plat is a copy of the legal description from the owners certificate which may be of assistance to some agencies. such as ACID and the County Assessor. Due to scene recent changes in the road alignment the street/ water/sewer improvement plans are-about a week or-less from completion and five sets will be submitted as soon as I'm-done. I've discussed this with .Gary Smith -and he said he has no problem with-this time frame. Interwest Development is forwarding proof of current v~a~ersnip andeansent of reearded owners under separate cover. -This plat as submitted is in substantial conformance with, and fundamentally meets all conditions, of the Preliminary Plat and the provisions of the applicable Meridian ordinance.` The plat and the improvement.-plans-are prepared in substantial conformance with generally accepted engineering and land surveying practices and local standards. We respectfully request to be heard as soon as possible before the City Council following acceptable Administrator Review. If you have any questions or need any more information please contact either of-the below at their respective phone number. l ~-• ~ _J r A.Leon Blaser, Developer- David M. Collins, P.E./L.S. C~nrner 385-0558 Project Engineer 377-9001 HYDRAULICS HYDROLOGY HIGHWAYS CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND DEVELOPMENT SURVEYING PLANNING ~~. ! ~ R~JEST FOR SUBDIVISIOI7 APPROVAL PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: - - f~ _, ~.. A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:_00 P.M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION: _ ~fffjTEi4G(. /LtFi4Db~~ 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision, ~~~`r~R- 5TH ~e2 ~ ~f~-5 T ~ D~ 2_ 2 . General location, !n SW 4 SEC 5 ~ ~` JP1 e ~' /~?" 3. Owners of record, ~it~7~iew~~ ~~FL~~/~F~O?~ ~Nc' $ ~~~_'~~~ "Address 335o~irtEiQlg4uA ~~7~~ Ba /, , Zipgj~Dlo Telephone 3~1~"G'~~~8 4. .Applicant, Lti'Z~7Zcu~ ~iy~-/G4-G~ Address.. Si4~~ ~-S ~o U~. - _ - ~ G ~. i~.S' - r~L S ~ , 0,2L etA~.D 3 , --5.- Engineer,'~i~V~ 1.'~. ~LG~~S - Firm ~~ia~ll~~Address aiS~B'3~~. Zip Telephone 3 ~~ - ~o ~/ 6. Name and address to receive C-iTty bi~ljlings: Name .~N7~'2GcJ~'7"J~/[Y~l7~C/6~L- Address3~ ~p ~/~214't~ ~ ~~`~~'+ ~liP ~3 ~' 6 ~ Telephone ~ ~~ -- d 5S Icr ~~~~'~ PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres `~• 33 2 . Number of lots 3 ~ B4«-v~~ L e73 C°Z cO''''l a'~a'" ~° 7''~~ 3. Lots per acre 3 • ~~ ' 4. Density per acre ~ ~ `~- 4 ~-7 ~c., 5. Zoning classification(s) ~ " g -. 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside--.the Meridian City limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification N~/~: 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt ~O. - 8. Have recreational easements been provided for. ~O, 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City /1~0 , Explain ~~Q 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? F.S. Explain 7 ~ ~.~-•UD.TCi4~~~ ,~E"~-/~ ABU D .S/X.4L1. ~~i4-~Q. 1.~T ~oJQ SjG~/V . For future parks? ~o. Explain ~~jr, REQUEST FOR P1iELIMINAR~T: Planning and Zoning Commi~on continued Page '2 ~ /.U/11L PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision features continued 11. What school (s) service the area /YIER !,Dl~~U do you propose any agreements for future school sites O. , Explain ~tl~A , 12. Other proposed amenities to the City X110. Water Supply N~i~, Fire Department ~/I~, , Other /U,,~/,~, , Explain ~~~. 13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination), ~ ~sl~ Ewe ~-~.~~, 14. Type of Dwellings) Single f ily, Duplexes, Multi exes, other 15. Proposed development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot (s~ , . ~, 00 D ~S~ ~ b. Minimum square footage of structure (s) , /3©c~ eJ'.,~ c. Are garages provided for,-_ ~~.5 square footage ~ k'U - ~.~/~ d. Are other coverings provided for L.<!GU -- e. Landscaping has been provided for ~.S -, Describe ~ F2lYr S ~J-~_~j - - S! ~ aV L _.o T - - f. Frees will be provided for -Lt:.K~ - Trees will be maintained - g. Sprinkler systems are provided for - h. Are there multiple units /l~ Q . , Type /17~~, remarks ~U iA i. Are there special set back requirements ~S , Explain 1'~ ~~+-c~ ~Ci7~' J- Has off street parking been provided for ES Explain a l v~W~ ~~, k. Value range of property 1. Type of financing-for development ? m. Protective covenants were submitted y~ S ° N u- [cu _ 16. Does the proposal land lock-other property- /~/d, ~ - Does it create Enclaves /lld. ~•a d- s~. L ~'d l~ B c.~SE•e STATEMENTS AF C70MPLIANCE: _ - ~~'7~~~fT~lti/9`.~roEG. ~ gutters. and sidewalks-are to be constructed to-standards as ~~ 1. Streets curbs ~~ required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. ~.~ r _ CERTIFICATE OF OWNERS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT THE UNDERSIGNED ARE THE OWNERS OF THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO AND THAT THEY INTEND TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN THIS SUBDIVISION: A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, T.3N.,R.1E.,BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 5. T. 3N., R.SE., BOISE MERIDIAN, IDAHO, THENCE N. 00'26'30" E. 1963.11 FEET TO A POINT MARKING THE INTERSECTION OF N.L000ST GROVE ROAD AND E.CHATEAU DRIVE, THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF E. CHATEAU DRIVE N. 75'26'30" E. 50.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTRAL ANGLE IS 05'26'17" AND WHOSE RADIUS IS 421.13 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 39.97 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE N. 70'00'14" E. 450.36 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE N. 19'24'43" W. .30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S. 19'24'43" E. 60.00 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE N. 70'00'14" E. 114.03 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE S. 00'09'38" E. 184.11 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE N. 89'50'22" E. 370.00 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE S. 00'09'38" E. 100.00 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE S. 14'57'59" W. 51.79 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE S. 00'09'38" E. 100.00 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE N. 89'50'22" E. 340.00 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE N. 00'26'48" E. 508.68 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE N. 89'33'12" W. 85.00 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE N. 00'26'48" E•. 50.00 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE N. 86'32'32" W. 85.97 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE S. 89'50'22" W. 252.99 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE MARKED BY A PIN, THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTRAL ANGLE IS 19'50'08", AND WHOSE RADIUS IS 530.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 183.48 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY MARKED BY A PIN, THENCE S. 70'00'14" W. 200.08 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE N. 07'44'03" W. 134.95 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE N. 00'26'30' E. 50.00 FEET TO THE END POINT OF A CURVE MARKED BY A PIN, THENCE EASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTRAL ANGLE IS 05'18'12", AND WHOSE RADIUS IS 475.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 43.97 FEET TO A POINT ON CURVE MARKED BY A PIN, THENCE, LEAVING SAID CURVE, N. 00'14'22" E. 82.48 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE N. 89'33'30" W. 254.70 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE N. 00'26'30" E. 15.00 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE N. 89'33'30" W. 305.35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 5, T.3N., R.1E., B.M., SAID POINT BEING MARKED BY A PIN, THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE S. 00'26'30" W. 273.13 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE, LEAVING SAID WEST LINE, S. 89'33'30" E. 40.00 FEET TO A PIN, THENCE S. 00'26'30" W. 178.98 FEET TO A POINT ON CURVE MARKED BY A PIN, THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTRAL ANGLE IS 64'58'18", AND WHOSE RADIUS IS 25.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 28.35 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE MARKED BY A PIN, THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTRAL ANGLE IS 01'31'15", AND WHOSE RADIUS IS 391.13 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 10.38 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY MARKED BY A PIN. THENCE N. 70'00'14" E. 450.66 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 11.3315 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.