HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-01-17P~~cc~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~ c ~~c~, -- ~1
CITY C®Uf~CIL REGULAR MEETING
ADEN®A
Tuesday, January 1~, 2006 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho
`Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony,
all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be
truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter."
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Shaun Wardle Joe Borton
Charlie Rountree Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance:
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Bud Henthorn, with Meridian
Gospel Tabernacle:
4. Adoption of the Agenda:
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of November 1, 2005 City Council Regular Meeting:
B. Approve Minutes of November 15, 2005 City Council Special
Workshop /Meeting:
C. Approve Minutes of January 3, 2006 City Council Regular Meeting:
D. Tabled from January 10, 2006: _Budctet Amendment for
Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Plan Update Project:
E. Tabled from January 10, 2006: Contract for Wastewater
Treatment Plant Facility Plan Update Proiect with Carollo
Engineers:
F. Tabled from January 10, 2006: Contract for Wastewater
Treatment Plant Expansion Proiect Task Order No 4 with Carollo
Engineers:
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda -January 17, 2006 Page 1 of 3
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
•
1. Approve New Beer and Wine Licenses for Cody Do at Fusion
Asia.- 3161 E. Fairview Avenue, Ste. 110:
J. agreement with ACRD for Roadway Construction /Sewer and
1lVater Lrne Improvements for ACRD Project 503021, Locust
Grove, Franklin Road to Fairview Avenue:
IC. Agreement for Services with DC Enaineering. P C for the
Merrdran Water Department PRV SCADA Installation and
Programming:
L. Development Agreement: AZ 05-017 Request for Annexation and
Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina
Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. - on
Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road:
6. Department Reports:
7. Items Moved from Consent Agenda:
8. FP 05-078 Request for Final Plat approval of 16 single-family residential
building lots and 1 common area lot on 4.99 acres in a R-8 zone for Pisa
Place Subdivision by Briggs Engineering, Inc. - 3893 South Locust
Grove Road:
9. FP 05-081 Request for Final Plat approval for 30 single-family residential
building lots and 2 common lots on 9.28 acres in a R-8 zone for
Settlement Bridge Subdivision No 4 by Capital Development, Inc. -
southeast comer of North Locust Grove Road and East McMillan Road:
9. Public Hearing: CPA 05-004 Request fora Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to amend the text and future land use map of the 2002
Comprehensive Plan for the North Meridian Area and to expand the area
of city impact boundary:
10. Ordinance No. Amending Title 6,
Chapter 2, of the Meridian City Code Regarding Definitions of Vicious
Doas; Voluntary Disposal of Dogs; Dogs Attacking Persons or Other
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda -January 17, 2006 Page 2 of 3
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
•
Domestic Animals; and Owning or Keeping of Vicious Dogs;
Providing for Review of the Decision that Declares a Dog to be
Vicious:
11. Ordinance No. AZ 05-017 Request for
Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for
Messina Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. - on
South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road:
12. City Council President Liaison Assignments:
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda -January 17, 2006 Page 3 of 3
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
*>k TX CONFIRMA~N REPORT **
AS DF JAN 17 '06 09 36 PAGE.01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TOiFROM
02 01117 09 35 2083761481
MODE MINiSEC PGS CMD#i STATUS
EC--S 00'34" 002 210 OK
'l.~ d X ®~ .ldil'..,1~J4.t~1.~1
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, January 17, 2006 at 7:00 p.m,
City Council Chambers
33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho
"Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony,
al! presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be
truthful and honest to best of fhe ability of the presenter.
1. Roll-call Attendance:
Shaun Wardle Joe Borton
Charlie Rountree Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance:
3. Community Invocation by Pastor Bud Henthorn, with Meridian
Gospel Tabernacle:
4, Adoption of the Agenda:
5. Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of November 1, 2005 City Council Regular Meeting:
B• Approve Minutes of November 15, 2005 City Council Special
Workshop /Meeting:
~. Approve Minutes of January 3, 2006 City Council Regular Meeting:
D. Tabled ftom January 10, 2006: Bud4et Amendment for
Wastewater Treatment Plant Facili Plan Update Project:
E. Tabled from January 10, 2006: Contract far Wastewater
Treatment Plant pacility Plan Uodate Project with Carollo
Engineers:
F. Tabled from January 10, 2006: Contract for Wastewater
Treatment Plant Ex ansion Project Task Order No. 4 with Carollo
Engineers:
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda -January t 7, 2Q06 page 1 of 3
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Clty of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 88&4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
** TX CONFIRMA REPORT *~
AS OF JAN 17 '09:40 PAGE.01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
DATE TIME TOiFROM
03 01117 09:39 20837614@1
MODE MINiSEC PGS CMD# STATUS
EC--S 00'2@° 001 212 OK
G. Approve New Beer License and Liquor License Transfer fo_r
Gary Bates a4the Whitewater Saloon--1646 N. Meridian Road:
I-l. Approve Beer and Li uor License Transfer from Whitewater
Saloon to Alien Rossi at Carrabba's Italian Grill - 3285 E. Pine
Avenue:
I• Approve New Beer and Wine Licenses for Cod Do at Fusion
Asian Grill - 3161 E. Fairview Avenue, Ste. 110:
J. Agreement with ACHD for Roadway Construction !Sewer and
Water Line Improvements for ACHD Project 503021, Locust
Grove, Franklin Road to Fairview Avenue:
K. Agreement for Services with DC Engineering P C. for the
Meridian Water Department PRV SCADA Installation and
Programming:
L. Development Agr®®ment: AZ 05-017 Request for Annexation and
Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina
Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany pevelopment, Inc. - on South
Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road:
6. Department Reports:
7. Items Moved from Consent Agenda:
8. FP 05-078 Request for Final Plat approval of 16 single-family residential
building lots and 1 common area lot on 4.99 acres in a R-8 zone for Pisa
Place Subdivision by Briggs Engineering, Inc. - 3893 South Locust
Grove Road:
9. FP 05-081 Request for Final Plat approval for 30 single-family residential
building lots and 2 common lots on 9.28 acres in a R-8 zone for
Settlement Brid a Subdivision No. 4 by Capital Development, Inc. -
southeast comer of North Locust Grove Road and East McMillan Road:
9. Public Hearing: CPA OS-004 Request fora Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to amend the text and future land use map of the 2002
Comprehensive Plan for the North Meridian Area and to expand the area
of city impact boundary:
10. Ordinance No. Amending Title 6,
Chapter 2, of the Meridian Gity Code Regarding Definitions of Vicious
Dogs; Voluntary Disposal of Dogs; Dogs Attacking Persons or Other
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda -January 17, 2006 Page 2 of 3
All materials presented at public meetings shalt become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents andlor hearing
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
• ~
CI1'~ OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, January 17, 2006 at 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
33 Eas# Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho
1.
Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony,
all presentations before the Mayor and City Counal are expected to be
truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter."
Roll-caq Attendance:
~_ Shaun Wardle ~ Joe Bor'ton
~, Charii® Rourr~ee T~ Keith Bird
,~,r_ Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2.
3.
4.
5.
Pledg® of Allegiance: ~il2rt, ~wrh~
Community Invocation by Pastor Bud Henthorn, with Meridian
Gospel Tabernacle:
Adoption of th® Agenda: ~prrr~ r~ ~~ ~e ri®~ ~
Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of November 1, 2005 City Counal Regular Meeting: ~~~/bv'~
B. Approve Minutes of November 15, 2005 City Council Special
Workshop /Meeting: ~~~~y'°v~
C. Approve Minutes of January 3, 2006 City Council Regular Meeting: ~~~a ~
®. Tabled from January 10, 2006: Bu et Amendrpent for
Waatewatat Treabn,~Plant Fa~ Plan Update Project: ~i~~~.
E. Tabled from January 10, 2006: Contract for Wastewater
Treatment Plant Facility Plan ate Project with Carollo
Engineers: ~~~-o or.L
F. Tabled from January 10, 2006: Contract for l,~astev~ra#er
Treatment Plartlt, ion Pro~Task er No. 4 with Carolio
Engineers: ~~;~,~-r~ ~
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda -January 17, 2Ut~ Page 1 of 3
All materials presenter) at public meetings shall b~;om® property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation far disabilities relate! to documents and/or hearing
please contact the City Cleric's Qffice at 86$-4433 at least +48 hours prior to the public meeting.
C7
G. Approve New Beer, License andLi+, ,uor License Transfer for
Gary Bates at the Whitew~,ter Salogn -1646 N, Meridian Road: ~~~vti..
- ~ .._
H. Approve Beer artd Liquor i,ic~Transfer from Whitewat®r
Saloom to Allen Rossi~rrab~a's I#alianl Gn~l - 3285 E. Pine
Avenue: ~'~~.~v~
I. Approve New Beer and Wine Li¢ensgs fQr Codv Do at Fusion
Asian rltl - 3161 E. Fairview Avenue, Ste. 110: ~~v'.e~
J. A~_r_eemen~ with ACHD for Rc~~dw- av Conshnuction, / Sgwer and
i~ltater L'r~ Imaro~~ for ACRD Project 503021, Locust
Grove, Franklin Road to Fairview Avenue: ~d~r~~
K. Agreement for Service~th ~ Entrineening. P.C. for he
Merid,~ ~t~rDeaartm~nt PRV SCADA linstallafion and
Programming: ~;~~~
L. Development Agreement: AZ 05-017 Request for Annexation and
Zoning of 13?.~ ages from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina
Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. - on South
Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road:~~C.c ~v
6. Department Reports: ~?iOh,~
7. Items Moved from Consent Agenda: `verrs-~.
8. FP 05-078 Request for Final Plat approval of 16 singl®-family residential
building lots and 1 common area lot on 4.99 acres in a R-8 zone for Pisa
Piave Subdivision by Briggs Engineering, Inc. -- 3893 South Loaas#
Grove Road: ~~~,.,~ v~
9. FP 05-081 Request for Final Plat approval for 30 single-family residential
building lots and 2 common lots on 9.28 acres in a R-8 zone for
Settlement Bridpg, Subdivision No. 4 by Capital Development, tnc. -
southeast corner of North Locust Grove Road and East McMillan Road: ~e~,~H.c,
10. Public Hearing: CPA 0504 Request for a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to amend the text and future land use map of the 2002
Comprehensive Plan for the North Meridian Area and to expand the area
of city impact boundary:/ C'o-r,.fyhu.v/~/~ fv Z'7 0 6
11. Ordinance No. ~® ~~~~~ Amending True 6,
Chapter 2, of the Meridian City Code Regarding Definitions of llic_ loos
DDogs; Voluntary Disposal of Dogs; Dogs Attacking Persons or Other
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda -January 17, 20Q6 Page 2 of 3
Ail materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation far disabilities related to documents and/or hearing
please contact the City Clerk's OfTic~ at 888433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
•
Domestic Animals; and Awning or Keeping of Vicious Dogs;
Providing for Review of the Decision that Declares a Dog to be
Vicious: ~~;~~ ~Lc..
12. Ordinance Mo. ~ AZ 05-017 Request for
Annexation and Zoning of 137.E acres from RUT to R-8 zone for
AAessin~ Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany D®veiopment, tnc. - on
South Eagle Road befinreen East Victory Road and East Ami Road:
13. City Council President Liaison Assignments:
~~cvr-~^~.e~ ~- ~~6-eiZ Gc/~l~t
~,~~ - ~i~ l ~n~~~ ~ C~~ C/r~.rl~
/~ ~'~^-- -' ~~~zs , Lei u-C ® ~2, / ~'
Meridian City Courtd'I Meeting Agenda -January 17, 2006 Pegs 3 of 3
Ail materials presenter at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring acxommodadon for disabilities related to documents andlor hearing
please contact the City Cleric's office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meetjng.
~ ~
Meridian Citv Council Meeting January 17, 2006
The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 7:05 P.M.,
Tuesday, January 17, 2005, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd.
Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Shaun Wardle, Keith Bird, Charlie
Rountree and Joe Borton.
Others Present: Ted Baird, Will Berg, Ann Canning, Len Grady, Bill Musser, Steve
Siddoway, Ken Bowers, and Dean Willis.
Item 1: Roll-call Attendance:
Roll call.
X Shaun Wardle
X Charlie Rountree
X
X Joe Borton
X Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
De Weerd: Okay. We will go ahead and welcome you here this evening. Get this
meeting started. We appreciate you coming. It is Tuesday, January 17th. It is five
minutes after 7:00. We will start the meeting with roll call attendance.
Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance:
De Weerd: Item No. 2 is the pledge of allegiance. If you will all rise, we will be led
tonight by Mr. John Ewing.
(Pledge of Allegiance recited.)
Rountree: Give him a pin.
Item 3: Community Invocation by Pastor Bud Henthorn, with Meridian
Gospel Tabernacle:
De Weerd: Mr. Ewing, traditionally, when we ask our Boy Scouts to lead us in the
pledge, we give them a token of appreciation. Here is a City of Meridian pencil for you.
We were short on Boy Scouts tonight. Okay. Item No. 3 is our community invocation.
Tonight we will be led by Pastor Bud Henthorn with Meridian Gospel Tabernacle. If you
will all join us in the community invocation or take this as an opportunity for a moment of
silence.
Henthorne: Heavenly Father, we pause now in the midst of what has already been a
very long day to remember that the God who created us and designed us also loves us.
We pause for a moment to reflect on how grateful we are for the community in which we
live, for the people who are seated here around us, for those that work so hard to lead
us. We thank you in particular tonight for the many good things that are happening in
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 2 of 36
our city for young people, good things that young people in our city are doing. We ask,
God, that you would bless the work of their hands. And now, Lord, as we turn to the
issues that are at hand, we pray that you would center us in your presence, that you
would allow us to be -- to be better than we could be tonight without you. We ask it in
Jesus' name, amen.
De Weerd: Thank you, Bud. I would like to take this as an opportunity -- I always like to
be able to tell a captive audience about some of the great things going on in our
community. We do have a presentation next week. We have fliers out on the back
table about meth -- meth. It's Meth and Families in Meridian. This is a very serious
topic in our society and we want to inform our public and our citizens not only as to what
kind of problem we have in our community and our valley and in our state, but also what
we are doing as a city to find solutions, to be part of an overall big picture and making
sure that this is not something that gets out of control, because the victim's are our
children, our families, and our work force. And so it has a serious impact and I would
encourage you to bring your kids to attend with them and to see how maybe you can be
apart of the solution to make a strong statement that this is not going to be tolerated in
our community and make a strong stand. So, we would invite you next Wednesday at
7:00 p.m. We will start at 6:30 with information booths and so we would enjoy you
joining us for that presentation. It's at the middle school.
Item 4: Adoption of the Agenda:
De Weerd: Item No. 4 is adoption of the agenda.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: In the consent item -- Consent Agenda, Item L has been asked to be tabled to
January 24th, 2006. On the regular agenda, Item 10 will be an ordinance and it's
number is 06-1211. And also No. 11 on the regular agenda has been asked to be
tabled to January 24th, '06. And with that I move that we approve the revised agenda.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Thank you. I have a motion to approve adoption of the agenda as changed.
Any discussion? Mr. Berg -- oh, I'm sorry. All those in favor say aye.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 5: Consent Agenda:
A. Approve Minutes of November 1, 2005 City Council Regular Meeting:
B. Approve Minutes of November 15, 2005 City Council Special
Workshop /Meeting:
Meridian City Council ~ •
January 17, 2006
Page 3 of 36
C. Approve Minutes of January 3, 2006 City Council Regular Meeting:
D. Tabled from January 10, 2006: Budget Amendment for
Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Plan Update Project:
E. Tabled from January 10, 2006: Contract for Wastewater
Treatment Plant Facility Plan Update Proiect with Carollo
Engineers:
F. Tabled from January 10, 2006: Contract for Wastewater
Treatment Plant Expansion Proiect Task Order No. 4 with Carollo
Engineers:
G. Approve New Beer License and Liauor License Transfer for
Gary Bates at the Whitewater Saloon -1646 N. Meridian Road:
H. Approve Beer and Liauor License Transfer from Whitewater
Saloon to Allen Rossi at Carrabba's Italian Grill - 3285 E. Pine
Avenue:
I. Approve New Beer and Wine Licenses for Codv Do at Fusion
Asian Grill - 3161 E. Fairview Avenue, Ste. 110:
J. Agreement with ACRD for Roadwav Construction /Sewer and
Water Line Improvements for ACHD Project 503021, Locust
Grove, Franklin Road to Fairview Avenue:
K. Agreement for Services with DC Engineering, P.C. for the
Meridian Water Department PRV SCADA Installation and
Programming:
De Weerd: Consent Agenda. Mr. Bird.
Bird: Madam Mayor, first of all, Mr. Clerk, I looked through here, but has all the beer
and wine licenses been signed off by the proper departments?
De Weerd: I'm glad it's not our staffs phone. You had her concerned, though.
Berg: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I can't tell you exactly for sure, but they
won't be issued until they are.
Bird: Okay.
Berg: I do have some indication that the fire and the planning has done that, but I can't
tell you exactly all of them. But they will not be --
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 4 of 36
Bird: I think all but one was signed off and it probably was, too.
Berg: Okay.
Bird: And all the agreements have been signed by the -- by the people that we are
going in contract with? With that I move that we approve the revised Consent Agenda.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve the Consent Agenda with the tabling of
Item 11 to 1/24/06. Okay. Mr. Berg, will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Borton, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 6: Department Reports:
Item 7: Items Moved from Consent Agenda:
De Weerd: Thank you. There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda into the
regular agenda.
Item 8: FP 05-078 Request for Final Plat approval of 16 single-family residential
building lots and 1 common area lot on 4.99 acres in a R-8 zone for Pisa
Place Subdivision by Briggs Engineering, Inc. - 3893 South Locust
Grove Road:
Item 9: FP 05-081 Request for Final Plat approval for 30 single-family residential
building lots and 2 common lots on 9.28 acres in a R-8 zone for
Settlement Bridge Subdivision No. 4 by Capital Development, Inc. -
southeast corner of North Locust Grove Road and East McMillan Road:
De Weerd: So, we will move to Item 8, FP 05-078 and FP 05-081. Anna.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, we do have signed letters from each
of these applicants stating they are in agreement with the conditions of approval. I did
want to bring up one quick issue. On Settlement Bridge you will notice this plat is
primarily the area that's circled in red and you will see there is a cul-de-sac there. The
applicant has modified this slightly. They did get a request for a statement from me
saying it was still in substantial compliance. I did give them that. You will notice it has a
snoopy now, because it is so short. It still has the some number of lots and the same
amount of open space or greater. So, I just wanted to make you aware of that issue.
But we do have letters of agreement from both applicants.
De Weerd: Thank you. And we have a new name. A snoopy.
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 5 of 36
Canning: Oh, the snoopy is because if you think about Snoopy lying on his back on the
dog house -- see, there is his head and, then, there is his nose.
De Weerd: What will we come up with next.
Canning: That one's actually been around for awhile, but --
De Weerd: I guess we haven't seen Snoopy rear his head yet. Okay. Council, any
questions?
Rountree: I have none.
De Weerd: Okay. I would entertain a motion.
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: Move that we approve Item No. 8, FP 05-078 and Item 9, FP 05-081.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second to approve Items 8 and 9. If there is
no discussion, Mr. Berg, will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Borton, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 10: Public Hearing: CPA 05-004 Request fora Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to amend the text and future land use map of the 2002
Comprehensive Plan for the North Meridian Area and to expand the area
of city impact boundary:
De Weerd: Okay. We have a second Item 9, it's a Public Hearing on CPA 05-004.
will open this Public Hearing with --
Rountree: Madam Mayor.
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle. I mean -- I'm sorry. Mr. Rountree.
Rountree: Mr. Wardle is down there.
De Weerd: I know.
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 6 of 36
Rountree: Having reviewed this item and the topics for the Public Hearing, given the
integral aspects of the state highway system with the major portion of this Comp Plan
hearing and given my capacity with the Idaho Transportation Department, I'm going to
have to recuse myself on this item, though it's going to be the best show in town,
apparently. So, with that --
De Weerd: We will see you later.
Rountree: Okay.
De Weerd: Okay. This Public Hearing is open. I will start with staff comments.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I did want to mention that I do have
a handful of eight and a half by 11's of this map. If people are unable to see the one on
the board and just -- we will -- please try and share. There is not enough for everyone
before they disappear. I do have a file that we can zoom in on. As people are having
specific discussions about a property and they want us to zoom in, I will be able to do
that, so everyone will be able to see enlarged versions of this. Mr. Siddoway is going to
put them on the back table. Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, you had a
workshop on this item that went through the application in detail. So, tonight I thought it
would be best to give you a summary of the staff report and to really focus on some of
the outstanding issues related to public comment letters or phone calls that we have
received and so that's how I have structured my presentation for tonight and, hopefully,
that will meet your needs, as well as those of the people in the audience. On that line,
there is one issue I wanted to clarify for the public before the discussion begins and that
in many of the public comment letters we have had there is -- there is an
understandable and very common misunderstanding with regard to zoning designations
versus Comprehensive Plan designations. So, I just wanted to take a moment and
explain the difference between those two items before we get started. The application
you have before you tonight is the Comprehensive Plan amendment and the
Comprehensive Plan is the vision document for the City of Meridian. It tells us how we
want to grow, where we want to grow, and what kind of development we anticipate in an
area. It is, again, the vision document for the city. The zoning ordinance or in our case
the Unified Development Code with zoning designations is what rules -- what applies as
law for the property. It has very specific standards and very specific outlines for those
areas. Whereas Comprehensive Plan designations can kind of move around a little bit
or are a little more flowing, zoning districts are generally done parcel by parcel and are
very specific. If you wanted to develop in the city, you would need to be annexed and
zoned. This application before you tonight is not annexing any property and it's not
zoning any property. It's just giving a vision statement for what that will be in the future.
When you come in and want to develop or when -- then, you would request annexation
and you would request a zoning designation that is consistent with this plan. But it does
not physically zone anybody's property. Okay. There is my public education for the
day. And I'll get right into the project now. The applications that are before you tonight
is for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and it includes three general requests. One is
to expand the area of city impact, which currently runs along McDermott and Chinden.
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 7 of 36
We would extend it to go out to the county line along Ustick and, then, back along
Chinden. And, then, also to include an area north of Chinden from McDermott basically
over to Linder. And you can see everything that's colored is part of that area of city
impact expansion. So, that's the first. The second purpose of this application is to
designate new land uses and policies within the proposed expansion areas and to
amend the existing land uses in the current area of city impact. The third purpose is to
create a new circulation map and associated transportation policies to address multi-
modal forms of travel in north Meridian and I have our transportation coordinator here
with us, Mr. Siddoway, to -- and we are going to do kind of a tag team as we go through
this presentation. He's going to focus on the transportation issues and I will raise the
other ones. The Commission, the Planning and Zoning Commission, had
recommended approval of this application at their October 17th hearing and there were
-- your staff report notes numerous folks that came to testify in opposition and to
comment on that application and I am not -- I'll leave it to you to reference that staff
report, rather than go through those names at this time. I did want to make it clear up
front that staff is recommending that you hear this item tonight, but that you continue it.
We did not get comments from the Ada County Highway District regarding many of the
policies that relate to road design, particularly arterials and collectors, and we felt it was
important to get those comments and storm drainage and we felt it was important to get
those comments from them. They were not able to be here tonight to provide those.
However, having said that, you do have Findings for approval should the Council wish
to go that way tonight. The key issues of discussion by the Commission I'm going to list
and before I walked into the packed house today I thought most of those issues had
been resolved at the Commission level, but, clearly, there is a lot more interest here
than I was anticipating, so I won't presume that to be true at this point. Anyway, the
discussion included the Highway 16 preservation corridor, discussion of the northwest
corner of Chinden and Linder. The southwest corner of McMillan and Meridian. The
North Ten Mile, south of McMillan, the mixed use wastewater treatment plant area.
Compensation if state highway is constructed on or near the property. There was also a
fair amount of frustration about the public notification and involvement during the
application process. There was a discussion about including land north of the rim in the
area of city impact and access to said area. There was discussion of using Basco Lane
as a collector or not as a collector. There was discussion about providing incentives to
speed up the right-of--way acquisition for State Highway 16 and making the process
more collaborative. There was also discussion about the southwest corner of Ustick
and Linder. Staff is -- I'll go through these rather quickly. On the outstanding issues
that we know of we will go through in more detail in just a moment. The key
Commission changes to the staff recommendation were to change the southwest corner
of McMillan and Meridian to medium density residential. That's this one. To change the
northwest corner of Chinden and Linder to mixed-use community. To change the
property east and west of Black Cat Road north of Chinden to mixed use community.
There was a future expansion of the area of city impact north of the rim to the Boise
River and direct staff to draft a letter to the board of Ada County commissioners. So,
that was with regard to the property north of the Phyllis Canal. There was quite a bit of
discussion at the Planning and Zoning Commission stage, but to include that. They
were not in favor of amending the mixed use wastewater treatment plant area along
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 8 of 36
North Ten Mile to allow new office and residential uses. And most significantly of all,
they removed the State Highway 16 preservation corridor from the future land use map
and most of the associated policies in the text. The Commission emphasized the
importance of retaining McDermott Road as the preferred corridor and creation of a
private-public collaborative effort to address the future alignment. One of the interested
parties did call me and I would like. to note that there is still a need to delete the last
sentence of item number two, page one of the transportation policy section, and that still
references that overlay district. The rest of the policy is fine; we just need to take out
the reference to the overlay district. I'm going to go now and use the file that I can zoom
in on more, so you will have a better idea what's going on. Just a moment. On the
southeast corner of McDermott Road and West Chinden Boulevard you have several
comment letters in your packet. I think there is four or five, actually. And the properly
owners -- there was -- there was a misunderstanding, perhaps, at the Planning and
Zoning Commission hearing that this property owner was in agreement with just having
the mixed use designation on this portion of her property. She has written several
letters asking that that be extended to go to the adjoining subdivision as a mixed use
designation. She understands that she would have to buffer that residential use to her
east, but she would like the mixed use designation on -- to continue to her east
boundary. The next issue -- outstanding issue isn't related to a map item, it's regarding
future planning for the State Highway 16 corridor, however. The Planning and Zoning
Commission motion to Council included the following statement: The City of Meridian
supports a collaborative public-private partnership with the property owners, the Idaho
Transportation Department, Ada County, Canyon County, and other affected parties, to
identify a preferred alignment for the future State Highway 16 extension. Staff is just
requesting that City Council, if you choose to adopt that statement or make that a part of
this plan, that you give us a little additional guidance, in particular, what type of role do
you want the City of Meridian to play in this partnership. Are we the initiator? Are we
an advocate for area of impact citizens' interest? Are we a participation -- or participant
with ITD as lead? We just need to know City Council's thoughts on that, so we can act
appropriately. And, then, what level of priority should this corridor planning have in
relation to our other long-range planning projects. The next issue is land uses near
future Highway 16 -- Ustick and 16 interchange. That's this area here. A suggestion
was made to overlay the typical interchange diamonds you would get for -- to state
highways or for a state highway and we did do that and what we found out is that this
east-west width is appropriate, but the north-south dimension is probably lacking. So
staff would recommend that the mixed use designation extend 500 feet further north
and 500 feet further south. The east-west dimension, again, is okay, it just needs to go
further north and south. Again, the next one is not a map related issue. The Planning
and Zoning Commission chose to retain new policies regarding City of Meridian's
commitment to regional planning and cooperation and those are in Section G, page
three of the application. We just weren't sure how those would relate to recent
developments with the city of Eagle and their expanded area of city impact and the
pending action by the Ada County commissioners. As you know, this area to the north
of Chinden was also in the Eagle proposed area of city impact and Ada County has not
yet made a decision, but that will be in two Comprehensive Plans once this -- if it is
adopted as part of this application. If Mr. Siddoway can make his way back, he is going
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 9 of 36
to address the Compass letter from Patricia Nelson. In the staff report it did note that
the Commission did not want to go into in-depth review of Compass's letter, so they did
not specifically discuss it. Staff does believe that some of the points warrant discussion
by City Council and Mr. Siddoway is going to go through those.
Siddoway: Brad pointed out three points from the letter from Patricia Nelson that she
asked -- that he suggested warranted some further discussion by Council. If you have a
copy of her letter, it's items four, six, and seven. I will go through them. Item number
four talks about the policies regarding the mixed use interchange designation,
specifically regarding transit and park and ride facilities. Right now there is a specific
policy suggestion that transit and park and ride facilities be encouraged at the
interchange of Highway 16 and Highway 20-26. Her -- she agrees with that, she's
saying that it shouldn't be just specific to that one interchange, that it -- that such an
encouragement for transit facilities should be general to all interchanges. Her next point
on item number six in her letter talks about 20-26, Chinden Boulevard, and the policy as
currently written in the proposed Comp Plan amendment states that it would be a
corridor of at least 45 miles per hour. She points out that it's -- that they are assuming a
55 mile per hour speed and as a high speed facility. I think that this warrants maybe a
larger discussion about what we expect 20-26 to be. Through our planning thus far we
have been encouraging access management to 20-26 to every half mile and no more
often than that. As currently shown in the draft Communities in Motion plan, Compass
is envisioning 20-26 as an expressway, which would be a very limited, almost freeway-
style development, where you would have very limited access points and it would not be
accessed every half mile and they would propose to do that to maintain those speeds
up around 55 miles per hour and maintain the cross-regional transportation for mobility.
By having accesses every half mile, maintaining 55 miles per hour is not realistic, it
would most likely function at a 35 to 45 -- around the 45 mile per hour designation as
currently written. So, I just raise that for some discussion as to what we envision 20-26
as in the future.
De Weerd: Steve, the policy is every half mile.
Siddoway: Per our current ordinance it is every half mile.
De Weerd: And per the policy I believe for ITD.
Siddoway: ITD has been accepting of it. They are also supportive of the expressway
design, because their primary interest for 20-26 is regional mobility. But they have
accepted half mile accesses. They would accept less than that if that was the way we
chose to go.
De Weerd: So, you will rush to wait, is that it? The speed limit at 55 and you rush to
the next light.
Siddoway: To get to the road.
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 10 of 36
De Weerd: Okay.
Siddoway: Number seven, actually, rolls into the discussion that I just gave on number
six. They talk about signal spacing and how it's difFcult to maintain 45 miles an hour
progression with half mile spacing on signals. So, that's a summary of kind of the
outstanding letter -- outstanding issues from Compass's letter and I will turn it back to
Anna.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, those were the outstanding issues
noted in the staff report. So, now I'm going to go onto some of the letters from the
public comment we have received since the Planning and Zoning Commission. Some
of them are -- I highlighted as discussions by the Planning and Zoning Commission
previously. The first is with regard to the area north of the Phyllis Canal and you have
two -- three letters in your packets. Two are from individuals that wish to be included in
the area of city impact and one is from a husband and wife that do not wish for their
area to be included in this area of city impact. And perhaps I should spend just a little
bit of time talking about this. The Planning Commission wanted to send this back to
staff to have them include the area in the area of city impact. That was not the direction
we had from Council, nor did we have funds approved for further study of that area to
see if we could sewer and water that and those kinds of issues. So, we asked that
those folks that were interested, let this one go through, and that if Council desired we
would come back with another area of city impact amendment to include their property
or to extend that area of city impact. So, we did not go north of the Phyllis Canal for that
reason and -- but there was quite a bit of discussion at the Planning and Zoning
Commission level. The next -- the next area is that west of McDermott. You have got
an a-mail today from Wendell Bigham. Mr. Bigham was in the office and we started
comparing notes on how many schools he would need in these four square miles. I
noticed that we only had one proposed. His general policy -- and that's what he states
in there -- is that he needs one elementary school per square mile. He also was looking
to have a middle school and a high school somewhere in these four square miles to
serve the area going north. It wouldn't necessarily go east-west, as much as it would go
north to serve the Star area. Because this is -- this is Star Road. So, the city -- or the
Meridian School District boundaries do go quite a bit further north and, then, they go a
little bit south into Canyon County right in this area, but not much, really. So, I wanted
to point that out. There was a comment from one of the folks in the audience that the
handouts that we provided are a little hard to read. I would suggest that they look up at
the screen. The color resolution is a little better up here. This is the low density
designation. This is medium. This is a mixed use, this brown area, as is this hatched
area. This is another mixed use neighborhood center. That's a fire station, I believe.
And that's a park. This is an office designation. Just to help the folks out in the
audience. Okay. Moving onto the next item. The sewer treatment letter -- or the sewer
treatment plant area, although the Planning and Zoning Commission did consider it in
their application and they only changed a small portion of it, there is still a letter
requesting that additional property be removed from that mixed use designation. Next
we will go to the northwest corner of Chinden and Linder.
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 11 of 36
De Weerd: Anna, I do think it's important to note that the fire station, the parks, and the
schools, except for those that we have already gotten indication from the school district
from, they are floating.
Canning: Yes.
De Weerd: Because there is an abstract or a building there, it doesn't mean that that is
exactly where it's going to go.
Canning: Yes, ma'am. Thank you for remembering to point that out. You also have a
letter from, I believe, one of these homeowners in this general area expressing some
concern with the mixed use designation along Chinden right at this Eagle -- or Linder
intersection. There has been a developer working in this area and they are just
concerned that the nature of that development and -- expressed general concern with
that designation. Next we will go to the northeast corner -- oh, I should also mention
this. A letter with regard to the southeast corner of Chinden and Linder as well and I
believe that they are stating that they are just in favor of what's being proposed. Okay.
Now, I will move to the northeast corner of Ustick and Linder. And, in particular, it's this
little five acre piece right here. And the person who wrote the letter, I believe, is here to
testify tonight and to my knowledge this issue wasn't raised at the Planning and Zoning
Commission level, but it may have been. I don't recall it. They would like a commercial
or mixed use designation on this property and they have provided you layouts. The -- I
think staffs recommendation would be that the neighborhood center at Venable and
Ustick, we have been really trying to make this neighborhood center work at the half
mile. If we -- we have had discussions with folks in the past and previous applicants
about if we start pulling that commercial to the arterial sections, we will lose the viability
of this half mile neighborhood center area with commercial and higher density
residential and neighborhood-serving uses, similar to those that are being proposed on
this five acres. And, then, finally, staff has noted just a few outstanding issues. One
was at Champion Park -- we tried to go through on the land use map and note where a
planned development had approved a use that -- such as Paramount, where they had
gotten a commercial designation and a high density residential and an office
designation and we tried to change the map to reflect those previous approvals. Well,
one of those that we missed was just right here, this small portion of medium density
residential was actually approved for community commercial in the front and, then,
neighborhood commercial. So, we are going to see some commercial uses there. We
thought it appropriate to amend the map to reflect those previous approvals. The
second one is -- the second and third one are both text amendments or -- with regard to
the text that's before you tonight. One is there was a discussion about arterial planning
in north Meridian that includes state highway discussion, but that state highway doesn't
include Eagle Road. The area before you tonight, actually, has little actual frontage on
Eagle Road, but there is no doubt that Eagle Road plays a huge impact on this area, for
planning for this area in general, and Mr. Siddoway has asked that he be able to provide
you a paragraph regarding discussion on Eagle Road and have that for your next
hearing, should you choose to continue this. Similarly, in the public transportation
section there is a policy regarding valley regional transit stops at activity centers and
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 12 of 36
right now it just calls out those along McMillan Road and we would ask to drop the
reference to McMillan Road, so that it applies to all activity centers or neighborhood
centers as they are shown on the map, not just those along McMillan. As noted at the
beginning of this presentation, staff feels it's very important to get ACHD comments on
the arterials, the collectors, the back-age road, and the storm drainage policies that are
before you tonight. There were a number of amendments in your proposal tonight that
are updates of the arterials list and the road projects list that were in the original Comp
Plan. Staff thought that the more appropriate thing to do, rather than update those on a
regular basis -- although we can, because the arterials are updated annually, the capital
improvements project is updated generally every three years, that maybe it's just more
important to reference the applicable documents in the Comprehensive Plan and not list
them out. Now, the pros and cons of that would be if the city saw a project that they felt
was important that wasn't on the list, they could call it out in the Comprehensive Plan.
But, again, these are very fluid lists as compared to the vision document for the city,
which is a longer term vision and shouldn't be changing from moment to moment. So,
we give that to City Council for their consideration tonight. And the last thing, there are
a number of specific policies that read a lot like standards in what's before you tonight,
and what we would like to do in the future, just so you know, is to bring those -- all those
rather standard-like policies back to you and say, okay, which ones of these do you
want us to incorporate into the Unified Development Code? Which of these are
important to get on every single policy -- project or which of these are more -- a little
more situational, that you want to be able to consider them as part of the development,
but not be held to a specific development standard on those issues. And with that I
believe staffs presentation is over and I can answer any questions you have.
De Weerd: Council, do you have any questions for staff?
Bird: Not at this time.
De Weerd: Okay. Okay. This is a Public Hearing and we will now entertain public
comment. Do we have asign-up sheet, Will? Thank you. Okay. First page we have
Shawn Nickel signed up. Would you like to provide testimony? Please state your name
and address for the record.
Nickel: Thank you, Madam Mayor. Shawn Nickel. 839 East Winding Creek Drive,
Suite 201, in Eagle.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Nickel: Mayor and Council, I'm here tonight representing several property owners in this
north Meridian area proposal. Specifically, Madam Mayor, I'm representing property
owners -- get my bearings here. Property owners near the -- in the section of North
Chinden Boulevard and west of Black Cat, about 160 acres in here. I'm also
representing a two acre property right here on the northwest corner of Ten Mile and
Chinden. I'm representing the northwest corner of Chinden and Linder Road. And the
southwest corner of Meridian Road and McMillan. Yes. All the properties that I have
Meridian City Council •
January 17, 2006
Page 13 of 36
mentioned, the property owners are in support of the proposed designation changes
that have come from staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission. I did submit a
letter to staff last week regarding the two acre piece on the northwest corner of Ten Mile
and Chinden. Anna, can you --
Canning: Zoom in on it?
Nickel: -- zoom in on that? It's this property right here, which is bound by, obviously,
20-26, the non-farm subdivision right here, that's an open space parcel. This is the
Spur Wing golf course. The property owner would like to request that this property right
here be designated as either a neighborhood mixed use or more consistent with the
medium density residential that is proposed to the east in the Spur Wing development
right here. Specifically, the reason for that request is the intersection of Ten Mile and
20-26 and the traffic signal that will be there that would have direct access through that
signal without having to have access onto the highway. So, that's the request -- I don't
know if staff has had a chance to analyze that, so I will let her present that information
to you. And, then, finally, if you could go to the northwest corner of 20-26 and Linder
Road and, again, Madam Mayor and Council, the property owners that I represent on
this property right here, they are in support of this recommended designation and they
do understand that this is a sensitive area, especially when you start abutting existing
county platted subdivisions with larger lots and they do understand that sensitivity and
also understand that transition and compatibility are issues that will be looked at once
the developments would come your way and annexation would be proposed. So, I'd
like to get that on the record. With that, any questions you have?
De Weerd: Thank you. Any questions? Thank you.
Nickel: Thank you for your time.
De Weerd: Creston Thornton is signed up for. Would you like to provide testimony?
Canning: Madam Mayor, just for those testifying tonight, there is a laser pointer at the
podium for your use. I think it's working.
Thornton: My name is Creston Thornton, I'm one of the developers on the piece that
Shawn Nickel just addressed up here in the northwest corner, and real quickly we'd like
to just address that we are very sensitive, again, to the issues of the people who have
larger pieces of land, parcels around us, and that we plan on doing a very high end
project there, Sun Valley style, and we would also like to propose on the two corners
coming into Meridian, as it will be an entranceway, waterfalls on each corner with a
welcome to Meridian artistic design that is like in some other areas of Eagle and
Meridian where you enter the city. So, we would like to work with you as a Council on
designing that entrance to the city there, as we own both sides of the street and would
like to work it into a very high end project that is also a way that we can low impact the
people around us. Thank you very much.
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 14 of 36
De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Curt Giles
address for the record.
If you will, please, state your name and
Giles: My name is Curtis Giles and I live at 5120 Larry Lane, Council.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Giles: And this afternoon I received a copy of the proposed north Meridian plan and I
noticed that it portrayed some commercial property directly north of myself and I'm at
the corner of -- let's see. I'm in the southeast corner of the intersection of Black Cat and
Chinden. I own this lot right here. It's a five acre parcel. It's lot number three, Compton
Subdivision No. 2. There are five lots in this -- six acre, five, five, six and six and this is
the residential urban transition property right now and I have lived on this property for 30
years and to buffer my property from noise and wind from the north, I planted trees in
here over a 30 year period, which are matured now. I have got a hundred trees in
there. Mixed species. And Planning and Zoning advised me there was going to be
frontage road on my property, which would remove all that protection and so forth and
was taking exception to that part of the plan, because just to keep a buffer there for the
noise and abatement for the commercial area. And my neighbor also has planted a
buffer there along his side of the property there. I would rather not have commercial
there, but if it were to be there, I'd rather it not be on me in terms of providing a frontage
road. If they have to have the frontage road, it should be moved up and evened up here
with the other properties along there. And I had prepared a letter and I wanted to
submit that to you.
De Weerd: Thank you. If you can submit it to the city clerk there.
Giles: Thank you, Council.
De Weerd: Thank you. Barbara Waterfield.
Waterfield: Mayor and Council, my name is Barbara Waterfield. I live at 6100 North
McDermott, which is right off of Chinden and McDermott. Most of my area -- I have
about 30 acres there and my brother owns eight acres adjoining. So, most of my land
will be impacted greatly by this. A lot of my land butts up to the people in Peregrine
Subdivision. I realize that they don't want commercial next to their property and I
understand that. I am in support of the whole Comprehensive Plan in overview. I didn't
realize that -- I guess I'm kind of confused. They are stating that some of the land would
be mixed use and some would be medium density. It just doesn't make sense to me to
have medium density next to an overpass. And I understand the concern of the people
in Peregrine that those are the residents and I would like to work with them, as well as
with the city, to do what is best for everyone. I think it's going to be impossible to make
everyone happy, though. So, with that being said, I am hoping that the Council will
listen to the people in Peregrine, with the understanding that they have to do what is
best for the city as a whole. Thank you.
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 15 of 36
De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Next signed up is Ed Jenkins. Thank you.
Jenkins: Good evening, Mayor and City Council. My name is Ed Jenkins. I live at 2584
Bullock Avenue in Meridian. And Barbara Waterfield is my sister and I'm talking about
the same area that she's talking about. Within the scope of the mixed use interchange
and the circle of that interchange, my business partners and I own 8.33 acres. It was an
approved cluster subdivision through Ada County, of which we received the blessing of
the City of Meridian as a comment last year when we received approval. We were
ready to start construction last year in late summer when we got our approval. We
were, then, confronted with this planning and zoning change. We are in general
agreement with- the corridor and on the original planning and zoning map, all of our
subdivision was mixed use interchange and with the comments from the folks at
Peregrine, I understand their concerns about a buffer zone, but they have, basically,
requested a buffer zone that's equal to the whole distance of their whole subdivision as
far as the width and we have presented a couple letters, one I presented to you on
January 10th and another letter October 19th to Planning and Zoning. And, basically,
we are just asking that that -- if they do get approval for medium -- for their residential
zoning, that that buffer zone not be half the way to McDermott Road, that it be more
reasonable, like 250 feet, and that's basically our position, if you have any questions.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Council, any questions?
Bird: I have none, Mayor.
Jenkins: Thank you very much.
De Weerd: Okay. Thomas Fassino.
Fassino: Thomas Fassino.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Fassino: You're welcome, Madam Mayor. 372 South Eagle Road, Suite 375.
De Weerd: Well, it did remind me -- I will apologize well in advance that I will not
guarantee I will not mess up your name, but it will not be on purpose. As you can see,
with my name, my name gets messed up a lot, so --
Fassino: Madam Mayor, Council Members, again, my name is Thomas Fassino. I'm an
urban planning consultant with Pathway Development and Castera Homes, both in
Boise. First, I would like to say that we support the McDermott Road corridor for the
future state highway connector and we congratulate you for taking a leadership position
in furthering good planning in our community. Wayne Forrey, a colleague of mine,
spoke to your Planning and Zoning Commission about the creation of the public-private
partnership that would work in a collaborative manner with the City of Meridian, ACRD,
other affected agencies and parties, on developing this corridor down McDermott Road
~ i
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 16 of 36
for Highway 16. Since we spoke with your Planning and Zoning Commission, many of
the major property owners have approached us in support of this public policy -- or,
excuse me, this public and private partnership. In our experience new state highways
can be built in half the time when these partnerships are developed. We have direct
experience working these partnerships in the Salt Lake City, Utah, area. And we have
also done extensive research in the Texas market. In addition to our research, the
Federal Highway Administration has studies and shows that these partnerships also
mitigate the time to about one half what it would normally take with government
agencies just strictly working on their own. In addition to that, the Federal Highway
Administration gives extra bonus points when it comes to funding during funding cycles
for agencies -- government agencies that are working in these type of partnerships to
help facilitate a more fluid process. So, in conclusion, we feel that this partnership will
help Meridian get the new Highway 16 alignment it desires and accomplish that in a
faster time frame. With that, we agree with the staffs recommendation on the creation
of a collaborative effort between all affected parties and in that spirit Pathway
Development and Casters Homes are willing to organize an initial meeting between all
the affected parties, that being property owners and staff at the City of Meridian level, to
come up with some thoughts or some ideas that can be brought back to the City
Council. We also invite City Council members to join that process if they so do wish to.
With that, I will stand for any questions.
De Weerd: Wow, that's truly unique. We appreciate that and I'm sure Mr. Siddoway
does, too. Transportation issues are definitely something that projects take a long time
and anything you can do to reduce the amount of time and certainly get all of the
stakeholders together is appreciated.
Fassino: Thank you. You're welcome.
De Weerd: Council, any questions or cheers?
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Sorry.
Wardle: One of the questions I have is certainly we are talking about a large portion of
north Meridian, but, in addition, we are talking other communities. Is it your intention to
coordinate, essentially, from the freeway all the way through to connect at Highway 16
where it meets State Street?
Fassino: Madam Mayor, Councilman Wardle, that is, indeed, our intention. We feel
that this is an important project to the community of Meridian, but it does also impact
other counties, Canyon County, and many property owners all the way to I-84 from
Highway 16. So, yes, that is our intention.
Wardle: Thank you.
•
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 17 of 36
De Weerd: Thank you.
Fassino: Thank you.
De Weerd: Robert Spriggel.
Spriggel: That is correct.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Spriggel: Madam Mayor. Mr. Chairman.
De Weerd: If you will state your name and address for the record.
Spriggel: Oh. Robert Spriggel. 4005 North McDermott Road in Meridian.
De Weerd: Thank you, sir.
Spriggel: First of all, I want to say that my remarks are really pointed at the State
Highway 16 extension, the McDermott Road portion of this. I'm here to oppose the CPA
05-004, because of the property in the affected areas. I would be unable to sell my
property at a fair market value as determined by similar property sales in an adjacent
vicinity. We have been told repeatedly by Meridian Planning and Zoning staff that
Meridian has no plans to extend services into the four square mile area bounded by
Ustick -- Ustick and Chinden there, so these four square miles, and we live right here.
Therefore, it appears that the main purpose and the timing of this amendment is to
provide a location for the State Highway 16 extension. The suggestion to extend State
Highway 16 from State Highway 44 to I-84 is nothing more than one single item on the
governor's current huge wish list. This project has not been approved by ACHD,
Canyon County, or Idaho Transportation Department. This project has not been
approved by the Idaho state legislature. No funding has been allocated or approved.
We all know that politics and politicians change. During the previous meetings of the
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission to obtain public comments, I do not recall
anyone expressing positive views with the current application as it is currently written
with the McDermott Road -- with the property owners on McDermott Road, with the
exception of the gentleman from Pathway Development, who, on October 3rd, stated
that this was good planning and, then, went onto express his concerns -- that of his
clients who hold over 900 acres affected by this plan. The overwhelming consensus of
those who testified during the previous meetings were asking for a reasonable solution,
other than locking up our investments for an unspecified amount of time. No one can
state for sure how long. For example, at the October 17th Meridian Planning and
Zoning meeting, the chairman, David Zaremba, stated at the conclusion of this
discussion on CPA 05-004, that it could be 20, 30, or even 40 years before this road is
built. A number of ITD projects have been on the books for 15 to 25 years and are still
not in the construction phase. What assurance do we have that this will not be the case
in this instance? None. Property owners must be protected from indiscriminate
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 18 of 36
governmental actions that will adversely affect
requesting that the Meridian City Council not
references to State Highway 16 alignment usin
you.
De Weerd: Thank you, sir.
(Applause from the audience.)
their property values. Therefore, I'm
approve the entire application until all
g McDermott Road be dropped. Thank
De Weerd: If you will, please, withhold that kind of response. Bruce Poe. If you will,
please, state your name and address.
Poe: My name is Bruce Poe. I am with Cole Thorpe Architects at 519 West Front
Street in Boise, Idaho.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Poe: I am representing a developer who would like to request a modification to the plan
and I believe you have a packet of material that, essentially, lays out the argument in
support of this concept. We have also provided you -- our board is in the way of your
projector, but we have provided you a conceptual idea for the corner of Ustick and
Linder. If you take a look at that particular intersection, we -- right now it is a medium --
it is slated to be medium density residential. We would like consideration for a mixed
use community designation on that corner. If you take a look at the site, at Ustick and
Linder, and the projections from Compass that we have with the traffic counts, we
currently have approximately 9,000 vehicles east-west and 10,000 vehicles in a north-
south direction at that intersection. By 2015 the counts have doubled in the east-west
direction and increased to about -- between 11 and 12 thousand going north-south. In
2030 the counts on the east-west direction have jumped to 22,000, almost tripling the
amount of traffic going east-west and, then, in a north-south direction, again, it has
increased up to 13,000 vehicles. As you can see -- and both roads are slated for future
modification to five lanes. ACHD has also slated that particular intersection for a stop
light. And so you have got five lanes of traffic coming from the north and south, five
lanes of traffic coming from the east and west, all of which is going to be stopped at that
intersection at some point in time. The current designation of medium density
residential on the northeast corner, from our perspective, is not the correct designation.
It's not compatible with the type of traffic that's going to be anticipated in that particular
area. So, our concept is that we are suggesting that we change to mixed use
community, with mixed use. We have got retail and office slated for the corner and,
then, transitioning back to a residential component to transition into the neighborhoods
to the north. We do have aletter -- we also submitted a letter and I'm going to submit
this additional letter to you that wasn't with your packet. You can pass this down the
line. We asked Thornton Oliver Keller to take a look at the property and give us their
professional opinion on that and in the letter they, essentially, state that the market
demands show that that particular corner would be better used for commercial and
mixed use. It also, they pointed out, as I already have done, that using the mixed use
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 19 of 36
community will, actually, benefit the residential area by providing a buffer between the
heavy traffic on the corner and what is happening -- what would -- with the residential
development to the north. We also have support -- verbal support. We don't have
letters to back this up. We have the potential developer of that property has verbal
support for the concept from the two property owners to the north and to the west and
we also have submitted a letter of support from the current property owner. And with
that I will open it up to questions.
De Weerd: Council, any questions?
Bird: I have none.
De Weerd: Thank you. Joe Hewert.
Hewert: Madam Mayor, Council, my name is Joe Hewert. I'm a property owner --
De Weerd: That was really bad, wasn't it?
Hewert: It gets the job done.
De Weerd: Well, you need to spell it, so everyone knows why I said that. No, you don't.
Okay.
Hewert: My address is 1963 East Blue Tick and I'm just here to -- well, actually, I am on
the southeast corner -- the property on the southeast corner of Linder and Chinden and
I just wanted to voice my support and go on the record in support of the CPA and that's
about it.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you.
Hewert: Thank you.
De Weerd: Dan Collins. Okay. Thank you. Richard Kartchner.
Kartchner: Madam Mayor and Council Members, my name is Richard Kartchner, 4325
North Ten Mile in Meridian and I'd like to talk about the area near the water treatment
plant. We are one of those people that have requested to be removed from that
designated area. We have been -- we are surrounded by residential area at this point
and have been for the last 20 years and feel that there is no reason to have such a
large buffer between us and the treatment plant as it is now designated. I represent
myself as a landowner and my neighbor Brent Rasmussen and this is our property and
we'd like to have that green line moved 350 feet this way, is what we are requesting.
We have put in your packet a letter from both of us with some salient points, I think,
about why that's an appropriate thing to do. We think it's best for our neighbors. We
are interested in developing and I don't think we can without a designation from the City
Council. I believe P&Z and staff hesitated to make any kind of additional
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 20 of 36
recommendation, because of the specific statement by City Council to have that area
designated under a restricted area from the sewer treatment plant. So, we'd like to
have that changed if we could to -- well, we want to put in some low density housing
residential. I think we would request a mixed use community, so that we could do
residential and perhaps some commercial frontage to Ten Mile.
De Weerd: Okay. Anything further?
Kartchner: That's all I have. Any questions?
De Weerd: Yeah.
Bird: I have none at this time.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you.
Kartchner: Thank you.
De Weerd: Darrell Richards.
Richards: I am Darrell Richards. I live at 6237 Serenity Way -- Serenity Lane in the
Peregrine Heights Subdivision.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Richards: Excuse me. We have come a long ways with this proposal and it's coming
together. The crowd tonight is a lot less hostile than it's been at the P&Z meetings.
You have heard from Barbara Waterfield, as well as Mr. Jenkins, with regards to our
proposal to change the designation at Peregrine Heights Subdivision, as well as the
surrounding area. I think we are in general agreement and still consistent with the
original letter that we submitted. There is a little bit of a misunderstanding in how much
of a buffer Mrs. Waterfield would like to see to our west. The original -- I think it's the
2002 land use map provided low density throughout that area and through the revision -
- the proposed revisions and the injection of Highway 16, obviously, low density doesn't
belong up against an interstate. But I would also suggest that there does need to be a
buffer between the Peregrine Heights Subdivision, which is a subdivision of one acre
lots, homes that are, generally, a half million dollars plus or minus, to any commercial or
mixed use use. So, whether the map is entirely accurate to what needs to be there, I
just ask that there be some medium density housing behind us. Mr. Jenkins proposed
250 feet. I don't know that that's right or wrong. Maybe there is enough room for one or
two cul-de-sacs in there. I'm not a residential developer, so I don't know what that land
requirement would be, but we do ask that there be some medium density housing
between us and the mixed use interchange. I do represent the homeowners
association on all those points.
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 21 of 36
De Weerd: I appreciate you clarifying that and I guess this is something that we will find
as we move out and start abutting some of the county subs and Council has been really
conscientious about a transition and I think in a mixed use venue, you will have a
greater landscape buffer than in some regards as you transition from one acre lots into
a medium density, you will probably find that you have a greater landscape buffer if you
abut a commercial type of development and that's just been our experience. And,
certainly, it's supportive by our ordinances and those kind of required buffers, that you
will definitely have an opportunity to comment as any application comes in front of
Council, to make sure that some of those are heard and you will have an opportunity to
voice that again.
Richards: Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you. Thomas Coleman.
Coleman: Madam Mayor, Councilmembers, I'm Thomas Coleman, 715 Village Lane.
work for Coleman Communities and we own approximately 320 acres right in this area
between Black Cat and McDermott on the north and south side of McMillan. I just
wanted to commend staff for working through all the public comments on this
Comprehensive Plan amendment and just that we are in support of it at this point.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Coleman: Thank you.
De Weerd: Val Stack.
Stack: Good evening.
De Weerd: Good Evening.
Stack: My name is Val Stack and I live at 6072 North Serenity Lane and that's in the
Peregrine Heights Subdivision. And I want to commend Darrell for making some
commentary about the buffer zone around us. For most of us that live on that lane, our
biggest issue is really noise. So, although I appreciate your comment that maybe there
is a parking lot and some trees behind us, we would still have the traffic noise and the
congestion that goes with that. So, that's really the big thing. We are not so worried
about little kids in the backyard so much. I'm really here on just a couple of quick points
tonight, just to kind of weigh in a little bit on the Highway 16 through McDermott.
Primarily I'm here because last time we didn't get counted as the tally of the number of
people that were for and against that were written up from the October 17th meeting.
Darrell had represented 15 people and it was counted as one. So, I'm here to say, hi,
I°m here, count me, too, please.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 22 of 36
~I
Stack: Some of the other things is before we all started clapping about Mr. Fassino's
willingness to collaborate, which we think is a commendable thing, is we'd like to
propose that you continue to look at the Star Road opportunity for -- instead of
McDermott. That road along there is mostly agricultural. There aren't so many
residences and you're also not going to have to readdress the environmental impact
issues that you're going to have to deal with as you go over the wetlands once you go
over the top of the hill from Chinden, you know, down into the Star Road area towards
Highway 16. Some of the other things, just kind of wanted to comment that I was the
one who -- maybe you thought this sounded nitpicky, but I'm not color blind and these
maps have three different shades of neon yellow, four similar shades of green, that are
all overlapping and pretty much impossible to read. And the only reason that I comment
on that, other than the fact that that can be fixed for next time, is that instead of this
being posted to the web where we should have been able to download it and print it on
good quality printers that you could be able to tell the difference, this has not been
posted on the web and it causes people to have to leave work, take time off of their job,
to go down and pick up a hard copy. So, I think because last time we also didn't get the
notice on the last meeting and we haven't had notice on this particular meeting -- the
only people that were receiving notice were those who had 40 acres or had spoken at
the meeting and so that's also why I'm here, so I get notice of the next meeting. Okay.
Thank you very much.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Stack: Appreciate it.
De Weerd: Ray Warick. Okay. Thank you, sir. Paul Hoyer. Okay. Thank you. Mr.
Endecott. Or Mrs. Endecott. I couldn't read your first name, so I thought I had a 50-50
chance; right? Boy, I'm striking really out tonight.
Endecott: My name is Renee Endecott.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Endecott: And I live at 1450 West Ustick Road. Mayor, City Council, I was very
pleased with the presentation Mr. Poe presented on our property. We have lived there
33 years. Raised our children. Had a marvelous time. Meridian country is no longer
country and at this point the traffic is horrendous, you can't get out of the driveway
unless you go out to Linder Road after 4:00 o'clock in the afternoon. We can really no
longer raise animals there like we used to. We had an issue a couple of years ago with
our animals. Neighborhood dogs came and killed eight sheep while we were in McCall.
I don't -- I can't -- don't feel like I can put animals on there with that risk anymore. It's
time to let the city expand and grow and I hope that you would give consideration to this
development. Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you. Derrick O'Neil? Okay. Thank you. Paul Hoyum. Okay.
Maybe I have really messed that one up, but I can't read the writing. So, is there any
Meridian Ciry Council
January 17, 2006
Page 23 of 36
Paul who would like to provide testimony? Okay. Robert Solito. Okay. Those are the
ones that have signed up to testify. I would open this up. Is there anyone who would
like to provide testimony that hasn't been called on? Okay. Staff. I thought we were
going to get through a whole evening without this.
Turnbull: I have got a laser pointer in my hand.
De Weerd: If you will, please, state your name and address for the record.
Turnbull: David Turnbull. Brighton Corporation. 12601 West Explorer Drive.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Turnbull: I am here to encourage adoption of this plan. It was a long time ago, it seems
like, when we started working on this in a collaborative effort and I appreciate staffs
efforts to bring this forward. They took some of the work that we started with and made
appropriate modifications, I believe. I think that what you have before you is a good
plan. I would make a couple of comments on transportation issues, particularly. I think
that it is important if you're going to make some major transportation improvements that
those plans need to be made well in advance. Some discussion was made about the
Compass letter, talking about 26, and I'm afraid, like other areas that we could talk
about, that the horse is out of the barn on that in many respects and, in fact, ITD has
required us to install signals at the half mile intersection there already. If it was going to
be planned for an expressway, that should have been started many years ago. And I
don't see a viable alternative for retrofitting that at this point. If McDermott Road is
going to be the location for a future transportation corridor from the interstate all the way
to the Emmett Highway, then, I think that that needs to be taken into consideration now
before any planning -- or, you know, major development starts in that area, so that the
state isn't faced with expensive retrofits in the future to accommodate that transportation
corridor. With that I would stand for any questions.
De Weerd: Council, any questions?
Bird: I have none.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Any further testimony?
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, as public testimony started I realized
I forgot to let Mr. Siddoway talk about some outstanding issues or just minor changes
to the other map that's associated with this application. So, it -- with your indulgence,
we will go back to that portion at this point.
De Weerd: Is that to the circulation map?
Canning: Yes, Ma'am.
•
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 24 of 36
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you.
Siddoway: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I did review the auto circulation
map as proposed with the new revised land use map and would recommend a handful
of changes to you that we could bring back should there be an additional meeting. The
first change, really, is just a simple clean-up item. There is off of Ustick an existing
collector that we would want to show, just like we have shown all the other existing
collectors going into the subdivisions, so that's just a simple clean up. The second one
up in -- up at McDermott and Ustick. You saw on the land use map the mixed use
interchange designation, if we can go back. The mixed use interchange designation is
up here and skirts down here. What I would propose is that there would -- there is
needed aback-age road on the north side of Chinden along the back of that mixed use
and -- I guess that's all -- it's various mixed use designations, but behind the mixed use
designations that are there we need to add aback-age road that would simply separate
the commercial area from the residential area and provide that access that we need to
get people to and from those uses without having to go out onto Chinden. The same
issue exists over here near Linder Road where you saw a strip of mixed use community.
I would propose that there needs to be a back-age road shown, again, on the north side
of Chinden, that would connect from the half mile location over to Linder Road. As a
removal, there is shown a preferred back-age road that goes through the Peregrine
Heights Subdivision and that made sense when the land uses showed mixed use
regional there. However, that's been changed based on the testimony of -- at Planning
and Zoning and if the mixed use regional designation no longer occurs in that area, I
would propose that the preferred back-age road to the east of the collector be removed.
Over on the east end toward Locust Grove, we have shown a collector connection up to
Chinden at Jericho. In further work with ITD since this was created, we have
determined that the better location for that is actually closer to the half mile per our
policies and would align with -- I can't remember the name of the road to the north. The
subdivision to the north in Eagle has an existing road that stubs out to Chinden. We
would propose that that connection should be in alignment with it and that the Jericho
connection would go away, as ITD intends to have a future center median that would
prevent left turns from that location. So, the collector location would need to be at the
signalized intersection. Finally, down near McDermott and Ustick, there was also a
proposed interchange here with mixed use interchange land use around it right here
and I would propose that, once again, the mixed use interchange designation has -- was
being enlarged on the land use map and the back-age roads that would be associated
with that land use need to be added to the circulation map. That would be all the
changes that I would have and I would stand for any questions.
De Weerd: Council, any questions for Steve?
Bird: I have none.
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Meridian Ciry Council
January 17, 2006
Page 25 of 36
Borton: Steve, when you get the comments from ACHD on some of these issues, are
the changes that you have just described, have they been presented to ACHD to be
part of those discussions?
Siddoway: They are on the list of policies that they need to weigh in on. The collectors,
the back-age roads, the arterials, the drainage, and those are the comments that we are
needing back.
Borton: Okay.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I do have one transportation -- whether Steve answers it or who answers it --
McDermott, Ithink, is the third road I have heard that's going to connect SH 16 since
have sat on here. Originally, it was going to come over to Chinden from -- come up and
hit Chinden and come over the Black Cat and -- or to Ten Mile and, then, it was going to
go to Black Cat and come down to Franklin and over to Ten Mile and now it's -- this is
something before Iwould --Ithink Mr. Turnbull stated it properly, is if we are going to
make a corridor, we need to know right now and start proceeding with it as
developments come in, If that's the chosen corridor. Or are we going to change another
three or four times, so -- and I think ACHD -- we definitely need to get the roads before
we make any kind of decision of what type of roads, you know, they want out there and
how we are going to do it, what we are going to do the deal. But I'd like to know definite
that they are going to McDermott. I mean McDermott is the ideal location as far as an
interchange every two miles. Somebody said go over to Star. Well, Star's agood --
Star's anice road, but how do you put an interchange on? You can't put an interchange
on it, because you got people coming off about the time you have them coming on from
there, they are going off of Garrity. So, it's pretty hard to have amile -- every mile of
interchange. Anyway, I'd like to -- as a Councilman, I'd like to make sure that
McDermott is the corridor before we adopt any plan going out there, Steve.
Siddoway: Thank you.
De Weerd: And Iguess --Ithink it's important to note that this wasn't arbitrarily picked
from the governor's office as a connection north or south, it came -- it has been
discussed over the last year and a half in the Communities in Motion. It's kind of
surfaced in a lot of the public participation that we have had in that and what has really
supported it and with the Canyon County Highway District and the City of Nampa, is the
location between Ada and Canyon County, as well as the lack of development along
that corridor. So, there would be less disturbance. Star has a number of residential
developments up and down it and so this -- this corridor seems to be at least the most
preserved as far as what is built today. And I know there has been an effort to get
planning dollars by ITD to make sure that it is planned as expedient as possible, so it
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 26 of 36
answers some of the landowners' questions along that area. So, I think what we are
seeing in this corridor, Steve -- and correct me if I'm wrong -- is it has surfaced rather
rapidly and it's already gotten funding for a study, because of the sensitivity of the
landowner issues and being able to move forward with their own personal plans.
Siddoway: That's correct. It's been as -- Commissioner -- or Councilman Bird noted,
there has been a connection for State Highway 16 shown for years. It's been debated
where it should connect, Ten Mile, Black Cat, McDermott, but this McDermott
connection does reflect the latest planning through the long range transportation
planning process of Communities in Motion. The City of Meridian's staff certainly
support that as a preferred location, as opposed to Black Cat or Ten Mile, for many
reasons as noted in the staff report. Rather than dividing our community, it goes to the
edge and it is the most preserved in terms of the existing development along it and in
terms of interchanges along Interstate 84, it does set up the logical two mile progression
of interchanges where you would have an interchange at Meridian Road, Ten Mile,
McDermott, and, then, Garrity in Nampa. To move it one mile either direction would set
up a spacing that would not be allowed under today's ITD policies.
De Weerd: Thank you, Steve. Thank you, Mr. Bird. Okay. Anna.
Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of Council, there was about five issues that came
up during the public testimony that I wanted to just give a little more comment on.
Some of them were kind of -- the person giving the comment asked for staffs input.
The first, Mr. Nickel asked if staff had had an opportunity to look at this area. And, I'm
sorry, I forgot to include -- oh.
De Weerd: Oh, that makes it a lot clearer.
Canning: Sorry about that. See if I guessed right. I'm sorry, I forgot to include Mr.
Nickel's letter in my first presentation. The piece of property in question was this one
right here and they wanted some nonresidential designation, whether that be mixed use
or commercial. This site presents a number of challenges. There is a small access
road that comes over to an undeveloped portion of Spur Wing that was originally -- their
concept plan that they used in the marketing of the project has always shown this as
kind of townhouses. And, then, the question is does this become a road out, access
out, which would tend to encourage a lot of traffic through that small portion of the
development, or do you keep it here. And that's very much tied into what happens on
this piece of property, whether or not you had a light there. My general thoughts on the
development of this area would be that this connection is not likely to happen and,
therefore, it may not be appropriate to have a very small bit of commercial property
there at that mile location with little reference to the surrounding areas. We tend to try
and get a larger concentration of commercial uses than just one single property and that
would kind of tie in with some of the comments that I had about property that Mr. Poe
spoke about on Ustick and Linder just over this way with this property here. They do --
you know, we often hear that about these arterial intersections, that they are just not
suitable for residential properties, yet we see example after example, even along Eagle
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 27 of 36
Road, where you have very nice residential developments that are along the arterial
connections. And, again, staff has been working towards achieving that vision in our
current Comprehensive Plan of having a neighborhood center here. That neighborhood
center will have a hard time surviving if there are other commercial uses pulling away
from that half mile location. There was -- Mr. Spriggel expressed concern about what
he would be able to do on his property by being put into this area of city impact and I did
want to make it a little bit clearer as to how this may or may not affect it, based on what
you can do in Ada County currently. Currently, this property is zoned rural residential in
Ada County, which allows you to do five acre lots or a non-farm subdivision. I'm sorry.
Ten acre lots or a non-farm subdivision, which allows you one unit per five acres. That
would be the most dense development that you would be able to obtain on this, unless it
were part of a planned community. If it were brought into the area of city impact, there
is opportunity to do something called a cluster subdivision, which we heard reference on
the Waterfield property and it allows one unit per five acres. So, really, the development
rights to the property change very little with regard to full optimal build out between the
two designations. They are really very much identical. The standards for development
are actually a little more lenient in the cluster subdivision than they are in the rural
residential, non-farm subdivision. When we first started looking at this four acres, the
Governor had not even mentioned the Highway 16 and the GARVEE bonds. Staff
looked at this as an opportunity to expand our area of city impact to really look towards
a long range vision of the city and we felt that these four acres were more appropriately
folded into the community of Meridian than they would be into Star or Canyon County,
for that matter. And so we are just looking to a long range vision of the city, how to best
plan for this area, and kind of bring it into the community of Meridian. The other
statement I wanted to make -- when I was talking about the land use colors, I didn't
mean to offend the woman who had asked about them, I was trying to acknowledge that
the colors were very difficult to read on the handout we had today and that if you looked
up here it was easier to tell. So, certainly, I wasn't trying to minimize her concerns
regarding that. There are 12 shades of green on that handout that I got today. It's a
fault with color copiers. They have a hard time with greens. This map has been posted
on the web for several months now. I apologize that she wasn't able to find it, but it has
been available on the web. With that, I'll answer any questions the Mayor and Council
may have of staff.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Anna, how long would it -- is it going to take to get ACHD and all these reports
back that we are going to need or -- can we get it in a week or -- I, for one, am not going
to feel comfortable until we get the road designations and stuff, because I don't want to
be coming back visiting this every six months.
Siddoway: Madam Mayor and Councilman Bird, I spoke with Gary Inselman at ACRD
this afternoon and he suggested that if our next hearing was in two weeks, they could
have comments to us by then.
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 28 of 36
Bird: So, in other words, we are not -- our 31st meeting is going to be a workshop, I
believe -- isn't that right, Council President? So, February the 7th would be your
recommendation, Steve?
Siddoway: Yes.
Bird: Okay. Thank you.
De Weerd: Okay. Hey, Steve, can you also -- there was some testimony about
concern about a collector road that was going to take out a bunch of trees on some
private property. Can you address that?
Siddoway: The collector roads generally are not roads that would be built by ACHD or
the city coming in and forcing them into a location, they would -- they are expected by
the city to be built on properties as they develop. Assuming the properties to the south
do not redevelop and stay residential as they are shown on the Comp Plan, I would
expect to see that collector on the parcel to the north and as long as his trees are fully
on his own property, I don't see that the collector would take the trees out. It should be
on the -- on the commercial property that would be the one requiring that back-age
road.
De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Council, do you have any questions for staff at this
point?
Bird: I don't, Madam Mayor. Madam Mayor, do you want to continue this Public
Hearing? We have until February the 7th, 2006, and get back as strictly for -- do you
want to do it strictly for the road situation and locations, collectors, whatever we are
going to have?
De Weerd: I would.
Bird: We don't want to open it back up for everything, do we?
De Weerd: I believe Mr. Baird could tell us what your options are.
Baird: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, after the close of the public testimony
tonight, you did hear some new facts about the auto circulation and an indication that a
new map would be produced. It's my understanding that that would be available in
advance of the next hearing. And the other possible issue would be for those ACRD
comments. It would be my recommendation, if it is the Council's desire to continue this
hearing, to make it a continuation for those purposes only and to specifically limit new
testimony to the new issues that would be raised.
De Weerd: Okay.
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 29 of 36
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: Mr. Baird, is that also where you would recommend deliberation on any of
these other issues or shall we do that at this point in time?
Baird: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, my recommendation would be to begin
your deliberations after the close of all of the testimony. So, because of the intertwined
nature of the transportation with all the other issues, that would be my recommendation.
Wardle: Thank you.
De Weerd: Okay. So, Council, what would you like to do?
Bird: Is there any other testimony?
De Weerd: Okay. Is there any additional testimony? Sir, If you will, please, state your
name and address for the record.
Wood: My name is Ed Wood and I live at 6110 West Ustick.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Wood: And I had notice of one meeting and that was in early October. That meeting
was canceled. My property is going to be pretty highly impacted, because I live within
the circled area on -- near the intersection of McDermott and Ustick. And I also just
found out there is a planned back-age road, which might encircle my property, as well
as the mixed use zoning, which I'm not really sure what that means. I think it would be
nice if somehow I could get on the mailing list and be able to find out about things that
might impact my property. I live -- I live in this property right here. And I now see that
the back-age road is planned to go around the property and I'm not even real sure
exactly what I am able to do in this new marked area. I don't know if I can sell, build, or
exactly what my options might be.
De Weerd: This will give you an opportunity -- it sounds like it will be continued -- to talk
with staff, ask them about the back-age road and what that designation means. And it
sounds like if Council continues it, it will be open for public comment regarding
transportation-related comments. So, you could certainly provide your thoughts at that
time.
Wood: Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you. If you could ask it of staff -- okay. Certainly.
Stack: I just have a quick clarification question to ask Mr. Bird.
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 30 of 36
Bird: Yes.
Stack: You had made the comment that if we had the road at every two miles be the
major juncture, that that would put Garrity Road as an interchange area, yet you had
previously said that Star Road, which, you know -- or Can-Ada Road in that whole area
-- I mean that's the other end of the same road. So, why would it be appropriate at one
end and not the other end?
Bird: Well, no, Star Road is Robinson Boulevard to me.
Stack: Okay. Robinson Road.
Bird: It's one mile -- it's one mile from Garrity exit. You start three-quarter mile back
getting off to get off at Garrity and, then, you're going to put an interchange, people
coming down, it looks like -- if you're going on. If you put an interchange on Star Road,
you don't have the room. And I don't believe ITD or the federal will let you do it every
mile, which McDermott is the ideal -- every two miles.
Stack: So would --
Bird: You'd hit Ten Mile.
Stack: Uh-huh.
Bird: Then you got Black Cat and you would skip Black Cat and, then, you'd go to
McDermott and, then, you skip -- well, Can-Ada isn't quite a mile.
De Weerd: No. That's Star-Robinson.
Bird: And, then, to Robinson's a mile and, then, you have got Garrity. But it would be --
I think it would be a safety nightmare to be having people coming on at Robinson
Boulevard and getting off at Garrity. I mean you'd just have to keep a wrecker and a
police officer and ambulance there.
Stack: What about the Can-Ada -- you know, since that's the highway -- or the county
split area --
Bird: The Can-Ada?
Stack: -- because that would be an option.
Bird: And, you know, like I stated earlier, since we -- since that has been discussed, it's
been three roads that I know of and now it's McDermott. And, I don't know, I just would
like to know which one it is. Robinson Boulevard does not work. I mean Nampa, to be
truthful, wanted to put an interchange there, it was said no. They are just too close.
•
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 31 of 36
Stack: Okay. Thank you.
Bird: Thank you.
De Weerd: And I think, ma'am, that those were all considerations in the long range
transportation plan with the Communities in Motion and it just reiterated the every two
mile policy that ITD had with the interchanges and Can-Ada does connect to Garrity.
So, it already has an interchange.
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Borton.
Borton: Question for Mr. Baird. On the options that we have got, my inclination with not
having ACHD's input on some of the changes, an auto circulation map, changes that we
are going to see, I'm not sure how you can limit public comment at a continued hearing
just towards transportation issues. It seems like it's a slippery slope of where you draw
the line and you run the risk of having someone, you know, start talking about
transportation and it kind of sneaks into something else and -- I don't see how that's
feasible. I mean it's my inclination to error on the side of having duplicative testimony
versus, you know, keeping someone from talking about an issue that concerns them.
Baird: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Councilmember Borton, I certainly
understand your concern and I don't want to quash somebody's ability to testify.
However, I wouldn't want to have the continued hearing result in the people need to feel
that they have to come back one more time and say exactly what they said tonight.
Certainly, you will hear all testimony -- all relevant testimony at the continued hearing,
but, again, for those people who review the materials as they are presented, the ACHD
response, the newly revised map, for those individuals it doesn't change what they have
already said, there is no need for them to come back, because what they have said is in
the record. So, when I do make a recommendation that it be limited to those issues, of
course, it's with the understanding that there is some intertwined and necessarily wiggle
room and it's all up to the discretion of the chair. The Mayor.
Borton: Okay.
De Weerd: I guess I would ask staff if you can get all relevant information or new
information on line as you get it, so the public -- we will continue this to -- if Council does
provide that in their motion to February 7th and be looking at our website for related
materials or if you don't have web access, certainly, go to our city clerk's office or
Planning and Zoning and that information would be available for review as well.
Stack: Okay.
De Weerd: The information can be found under which department on our website?
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 32 of 36
LJ
Siddoway: If you go to the city's website, which is www.meridiancity.org, you click on
Departments and Planning and Zoning. Then, on the left-hand side of the Planning and
Zoning page, towards the bottom, there is a link to North Meridian Area Comprehensive
Plan Amendment. If you click on that it will take you to a page with all of the relevant
documents, both the original ones at the P&Z and the updated ones for the meeting
tonight.
De Weerd: Can you kind of earmark them new, so people know --
Siddoway: They have dates on them.
De Weerd: Okay. That's even better. Okay. Sir, would you like to provide testimony?
If you will, please, state your name and address.
Anderson: My name is Scott Anderson. I own this piece of property on this other
corner.
De Weerd: And your address is?
Anderson: I live at 500 River Heights Drive in Meridian.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Anderson: But I own this other piece of property.
De Weerd: There is a pointer there in front of you.
Anderson: Oh. Okay. This piece of property right here.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you.
Anderson: My question -- this may have already been answered, so I apologize. I
came in late. And maybe you have already discussed this. But I noticed that on the
28th of December Nampa city had an article in the Statesman about building sewer
around this corner right here. How does that -- I know that Meridian is putting a
moratorium on development of this property. How does that work out that Nampa is
going ahead and doing things, but Meridian is not? Is there ever discussion between
your Council and their Council or is there some kind of coordination that's going on?
De Weerd: Who wants to speak for Nampa?
Grady: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I'd have to check up on what Nampa is
doing there. I do know that we have met with them as soon as three months ago and,
basically, they are going to stay on the Canyon County side and we are going to stay on
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 33 of 36
the Ada County side. As far as any sort of moratorium, I'm not aware of any moratorium
on sewer in that area.
Anderson: Okay.
De Weerd: Yeah. Our efforts are not through moratorium, we are expanding our sewer
treatment plant right now and can't bring on new land until that is brought into operation,
which is two years. I believe that the article indicated -- and, certainly, the elected
officials have indicated on our long-term transportation planning, that their intent is also
to preserve that corridor for planning purposes, so that they know what is needed. I
don't know if they will commit clear up to that corner. That is what they have said
publicly.
Anderson: That was my question is if the highway department is trying to keep this
option open, why is Nampa going ahead and developing it, so -- no one knows here.
Okay.
De Weerd: I can't answer that.
Bird: Somebody could find their phone number for you.
Grady: Madam Mayor, if it's tabled, I can sure gather that information.
Bird: Thank you, Len.
De Weerd: Thank you, Len. Okay. Council, do I have a motion?
Wardle: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: I move that we continue Public Hearing on CPA 05-004 to February 7th, 2006.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to continue this to February 7th to receive the
transportation-related reports. Okay. Any discussion? All those in favor say aye. All
ayes. Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
De Weerd: We will take a five minute break and invite Councilman Rountree back in.
(Recess.)
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 34 of 36
De Weerd: Okay. D will go ahead and we are out of recess. Five minutes came and
went a long time ago.
Bird: We apologize, Mayor.
Item 11. Ordinance No. 06-1211 Amending Title 6, Chapter 2, of the
Meridian City Code Regarding Definitions of Vicious Doas; Voluntary
Disposal of Dogs; Dogs Attacking Persons or Other Domestic
Animals; and Owning or Keeping of Vicious Dogs; Providing for
Review of the Decision that Declares a Dog to be Vicious:
De Weerd: Well, I added do it, so -- it takes a village. Okay. Item No. 10 is ordinance
06-1211. Mr. Berg, if you will, please, read this ordinance by title only.
Berg: Thank you, Mayor, Members of the Council. And, Councilman Rountree, nice to
have you back.
Rountree: I'm back, Will.
Berg: Ordinance 06-1211, an ordinance amending Title 6, Chapter 2, of the Meridian
City Code regarding definition of vicious dogs, voluntary disposal of dogs, dogs
attacking persons or other domestic animals, and owning or keeping vicious dogs,
providing for the review of decision that declares a dog to be vicious, providing a
savings clause, and providing for a summary and providing for a waiver of the reading
rules, and providing an effective date.
De Weerd: Thank you, Mr. Berg. You have heard this ordinance read by title only. Is
there anyone who would like to hear it read in its entirety? And thank God for Frank.
He's a very friendly member out there. Okay. Council?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we approve Ordinance 06-1211 with suspension of rules.
Rountree: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. There is a motion to approve Item 10. If there is no further
discussion, Mr. Berg, will you call roll.
Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Borton, yea.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Meridian Ciry Council
January 17, 2006
Page 35 of 36
Item 12: Ordinance No. AZ 05-017 Request for
Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for
Messina Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. - on
South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road:
De Weerd: Thank you. Item 11 has been requested to continue. Do I need a motion,
Mr. Baird?
Baird: Madam Mayor, that was dispensed with at the beginning of the meeting when
you set the agenda, so --
De Weerd: Thank you.
Baird: -- it will come back.
Item 13: City Council President Liaison Assignments:
De Weerd: Thank you. Item 12. Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: Thank you, Madam Mayor. It's that time of year that we bring on new Council
members and I get to reassign liaison duties to the departments. So, I will begin with
Councilman Rountree, who will retain liaison duties with the Public Works Department.
Rountree: Sorry, Len.
De Weerd: Lucky you.
Wardle: Much to the chagrin of the department. I'm just kidding. Who has done a great
job and has, in my opinion, found a way to work with a very busy department and his
busy schedule, so I think it's a process that works and I appreciate that.
Rountree: Thanks for a-mail.
Wardle: Councilman Bird will retain the liaison position with the fire department, in
addition to his duties with the city clerk and the finance department and all of those
departments have seen a number of activities come forward and, certainly, he's had a
great year and will continue to this year. Councilman Borton will -- has expressed an
interest in working with the parks department and certainly feels that's a good
opportunity for him. In addition, I'd like to utilize his skills -- his many many skills in the
legal department and also assign him the human resources and legal department to be
the liaison.
De Weerd: What position are you running for right now?
Wardle: I'm just clearing up the minutes, Madam Mayor. And IT, which I know is an
area which Mr. Borton may be able to learn a little bit, is also on there. I will retain
•
Meridian City Council
January 17, 2006
Page 36 of 36
Planning and Zoning, the police department, and, as always, the Mayor's office. I don't
believe I have left any out.
De Weerd: You have the challenging one. I was talking about the Mayor's office. You
can read into it anything you want, Anna. Feeling guilty?
Wardle: With that, Madam Mayor, I will end my report.
De Weerd: Thank you so much. Council, I would entertain a motion to adjourn.
Rountree: So moved.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: All those in favor?
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: Thank you.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:23 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
~. ~ 7 ~
MAYOR T DE WEERD ,,~~~~°~Pid';~,~~a`~,, DATE APPROVED
® C_Vw
® '
~ '
~ w
~ ~~ ~1/ILLIAM G. BERG JR., CITY CLERK
~~~~P`®l p h i 1111 9 9 t X11 ~ ~~\'§~i7`\`\e
C~
January 13, 2006
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2006
APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-A
REQUEST Approve Minutes of November 1, 2005 City Council Regular Meeting
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted: Date: Phone:
Emailed: Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
January 13, 2006
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2t~6
APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-B
REQUEST Approve Minutes for November 15, 2005 City Council Special Workshop
Meeting
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT;
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST QFFICE:
a
OTWER:
Contacted: Date: Phone:
Emailed: Staff Initials:
Materials presented at pubpc meetM~ snap become properh- of the Cp`y ~ Meridian.
•
January 13, 2006
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2006
APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-C
REQUEST Approve Minutes for January 3, 2006 City Council Regular Meeting
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted: Date: Phone: _
Emailed: Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Mertdian.
January 13, 2006
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2006
APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-D
REQUEST Tabled from January 10, 2006 --Budget Amendment for Wastewater
Treatment Plant Facility Plan Update Project
AGENCY COMMENTS
GITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER: See attached
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR;
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ~ /
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: `/_`.'
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAMO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted: Date: Phone:
Emdiled: Staff Initials:
,Matertab Faresented ~ public meei~gs shall become property of the City of Meridian.
' rt w r ~,~ - ~ ;, ~
. ~_~ r+ ,~,, ~~..~,_
~~~
a Es
~'~® it4~illiam Eerg, Jr.; Tara G
~ e Ctint Dolsby, P.E., Engineer
o Er~d Watson, P.E., Public 1Aforks Di r
a ®1/12J
Rte: Proposed Agenda Items for January °l7, 2E~ City Council Meeting
The Public Works ant res Ily requests the following items be plac~l on ate
January ~ ~' City Council agenda, urger consent agenda, for CounaB's consideraticm:
This ,,..~~gg~~ppAA,, t amendment is for completion of the facility plan docum~t in the amount of
Recom Council Acficm: The Public Works C~parbnent eecornrrterrds that City
Council approves the bud~t amendmen for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Facilit~t
Plan l9~late in the amount of $3~,~ for ~(.
blast r TfeatrXrent Plant Faality Pla~i Update Prom. Carolto Engineers has submitE~
a task or~r, ss~pe of work, and budget for this facility plannir~ document They propose to
complete tl~ work for $269,t~. This is a result of the sermon of Carollo Engineers from
their proposal that was received by the Public Works Department on l'~ovember 2, 2~5.
This proj~t shall be Ity described as services necessary for completion of a Faalities
Planning Doc~rment The document will be intended to meet the re~iremer~te of Idaho
Department of Environ l G~,ral~y (DEQ) for wastewater facilities S1ete Revolving tan
~ Page 1
p ram. Asi from DBE's requiremerrtss, plated meat wilt ate serve as a
preliminary design rapo~, including planning-level d 'ngs of nt plant p ,
re t®p to design.
Rem C®aancil ion: `The l~ubtic ~l®rics spa r~ r~®rnr~rt
ghat City Doeanoii approves ~e co of for ~a ter °Troaa Piar~
facility Plan U I~roj with Car®Ilo ~ngi ra for 59, arm autho '
thha Mayor to sign ite
This project consists of ills design of a Centrifuge, Anaerobic Digester Ido. 4 and Na. 5,
Biasolids Dryer Starage Silos, a digester gas storage faality a-x9 ultraviolet disinfec~ian
extension fi® match the build-Deaf capaaty of the liquid-phase treai~tt Digester 4 and 5 v~rill
provide digestion capacity such that the original Digesters 1 and 2 may be ~lcen out of
service.
R®copnmended Council Action: The public Works impartment r~ornra9ends
that City Coaancii approves coact for tl~ Wastewater Trr~trrter~t Plant
erasion Project Task t)rder No. 4 with Carallo Engincers for $595,748 and
atathoriu AAayor to sign it.
Thank you far your consi Please oarrtact me if you have any s regarding
any of ti7ese items.
® Page ~
January 13, 2~b
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2~6
APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-E
REQUEST Tabled from January 10, 2~6 -- con#ract for Wastewater Treatment Plant
Facility Plan Update project with Carollo Engineers
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER: Bee afMehed
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted: Date: Phone:
Emailed: Staff initials:
Materi~s presented at public rneef~~ shah becomo property of The Cffy of Meridiam.
~ ~
d 'r ~ _ --~
r ,t ~~-; ~""i ~E9~`~~~~2r ~" ~
~'~,~ r,` ~~~~. ~ ,_ ~ ~ , ~ JAN 9 ~ 200
- - - ~ ~.:~~~.;~a
City ®f ~Teridiar9,
City Clerk Ofl~ce
s,
~, ~;:
M j :~;
~:7
-7
`~ liV~liam F3erg, Jr.; Tara Grit
~ : Ctirrt Dolsby, P.E., Engin~r
® Erad VI! , P. E., Public 1lVorks Director
a 01/12/200
Proposed Agenda Items for January 17, 2006 City Council Meeting
The Public works ®epartment respec~Futly requests the following items be placed on the
January 1 ~ City Counal agenda, under exNtsent agenda, for Counal's consideration:
This budget amendment is f®r cornplotion of facility p0an dos;umernt in ~e amount of
~~,~.
This project shall be liy described as services necessary for completion of a Faalities
Planning lament. The document will be intended to meet the r~tiremer>ts of Idaho
(Department of Environmental duality (DEQ) for wastewater facilities Slate Revolving Loan
~ Page 1
program. As from ®E~'s requir~mar~ts, the plated docu nt wilt alp serve as a
preliminar~o design ~, including pl ning~l~v~l d 'ngs off t plate p ~,
ready to pr to design.
Reco Council Action: The Public orka Depa nt r~®rnnds
tF~at City ~ou~cil approves the coact for ~aswater Trea ~ Piarat
facility Man U Prod with Car®ilo ~ngin for X269, and a on
the Mayor to sagn it.
This project consists of the design of a Gentrifuge, Ar~erobic Di r No. 4 and No. 5,
Biosolids [dryer Storage Silos, a digester gas storage faality and ultraviolet disinfection
extension ~ match the build-out cap~iiy of the liquid-phase treairrtent. ®igester 4 and 5 will
provide digestion capacity such that ~e original Digesters 1 and 2 may be taken out of
service.
R®aornttte Council Action> The Public Works ~~rtrnerrt necomm®nds
that City Council approves contract for tip Wa~water Trostment Piarrt
~cnsion Pro Task t}rder iVo. 4 wiiih Carollo Engineers for $515,748 and
aui~ori~ the Mayor to sign ~.
Thank you for your c~n8ideration. Please oor~ct me if you have any s regarding
any of hems.
~ Page 2
•
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Project No.
This AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of January, 2006 by and between
City of Meridian, Idaho, (hereinafter "OWNER"), and Carollo Engineers, A Professional
Corporation, (hereinafter "ENGINEER").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the OWNER and the ENGINEER wish to enter into an Agreement (hereinafter
"Agreement") for the furnishing of Engineering Services in connection with
City of Meridian -Wastewater Treatment Plant
Facility Plan Update Project
(hereinafter "Project"), and
WHEREAS, ENGINEER is qualified and prepared to perform the necessary professional
services in connection with the Project.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants of the parties
hereto, it is agreed as follows:
SECTION 1 -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1.1 ENGINEER shall provide professional
engineering services in all phases of
the Project to which this Agreement
applies. The services furnished by the
ENGINEER will be defined by Task
Orders which will set forth the
Engineer's Services, Time of
Performance, and Payment.
caused by events beyond the control
of ENGINEER. In the event
ENGINEER's services are
suspended, delayed or interrupted for
the convenience of the OWNER or
delays occur beyond the control of
ENGINEER, an equitable adjustment
in ENGINEER's time of performance
and cost of ENGINEER's personnel
and subcontractors shall be made.
1.2 It is .intended that each Task Order,
after execution by both parties shall
become a supplement to and a part of
this Agreement.
SECTION 2 -PAYMENT TO ENGINEER
2.1 As consideration for providing the
services referred to in Section 1, the
OWNER shall pay ENGINEER on the
basis to be established in the Task
Order for Services.
2.2 The ENGINEER is not responsible for
damage or delay in performance
2.3 OWNER reserves the right to direct
revision of ENGINEER's services as
may be necessary. When ENGINEER
is directed to make revisions under
this section of the agreement,
ENGINEER shall advise OWNER of
the probable costs involved in
completing engineering services and
the time of performance for such
completion.
2.4 In the event OWNER and ENGINEER
cannot agree on equitable
compensation for services rendered in
making revisions, then, at OWNER's
H:~FinallMeridianlAgr.doc Page 1 of 5
•
option, ENGINEER shall either
continue performance under the
revised Agreement and an equitable
adjustment in ENGINEER's time of
performance and cost of ENGINEER's
personnel shall be made at
completion of the revised work or
ENGINEER shall not be obligated to
continue performance under this
Agreement.
2.5 If revisions of the final plans and
spec cations are required by reasons
of ENGINEER's error or omission,
then, in that event, OWNER's
exclusive remedy for such errors and
omissions will be limited to revisions
made by ENGINEER without
additional compensation.
2.6 The ENGINEER shall bill the OWNER
monthly indicating the services
performed and the cost of such
services.
OWNER agrees to pay invoices within
45 days of their date. Payments not
received by ENGINEER within 45
days shall be considered delinquent
and subject to a finance charge of
1 percent per month for each month
unpaid after the date of invoice.
ENGINEER may suspend services
should an invoice remain delinquent
for 75 days from date of invoice.
2.7 All notices shall be made in writing
and may be given by personal delivery
or by mail. Notices sent by mail shall
be addressed to the designated
responsible person or office:
TO OWNER:
Mr. Clint Dolsby, P.E.
City of Meridian, Public Works Dept.
660 E. Watertower, Suite 200,
Meridian, ID 83642
•
TO ENGINEER:
Mr. Tim Tekippe, P.E.
12592 W. Explorer Drive, Suite 200
Boise, ID 83713
Idaho PE# 8572
and when so addressed, shall be
deemed given upon deposit in the
United States Mail, postage prepaid.
In all other instances, notices and
invoices shall be deemed given at the
time of actual delivery.
All payments are to be mailed to:
Carollo Engineers, P.C.
P.O. Box 53511
Phoenix, AZ 85072-3511
unless otherwise informed on the face
of the invoice.
SECTION 3 -MISCELLANEOUS
3.1 The OWNER shall fumish the
ENGINEER available studies, reports
and other data pertinent to
ENGINEER's services; obtain or
authorize ENGINEER to obtain or
provide additional reports and data as
required; fumish to ENGINEER
services of others required for the
performance of ENGINEER's services
hereunder, and ENGINEER shall be
entitled to use and rely upon all such
information and services provided by
OWNER or others in performing
ENGINEER's services under this
Agreement.
3.2 The OWNER shall arrange for access
to and make all provisions for
ENGINEER to enter upon public and
private property as required for
ENGINEER to perform services
hereunder.
3.3 Documents, including drawings and
spec cations, prepared by
ENGINEER pursuant to this
H:1Fna11MeridianWgr.doc Page 2 of 5
C~
•
Agreement are not intended or whole or in part by either party's
represented to be suitable for reuse negligent acts, errors or omissions,
by OWNER or others for this Project willful misconduct or OWNER's lawful
or on any other project. Any reuse of responsibility respectively or, anyone
completed documents or use of directly or indirectly employed by
partially completed documents without either of them or anyone for whose
written verification or concurrence by acts they may be liable regardless of
ENGINEER for the specific purpose whether or not such claim, loss,
intended will be at OWNER's sole risk liability or damage is caused in part by
and without liability or legal exposure a party indemnified hereunder.
to ENGINEER; and OWNER shall
indemnify and hold harmless In the event that both OWNER's and
ENGINEER from all claims, damages, ENGINEER's wrongful act or lawful
losses and expenses, including responsibility is the proximate cause of
attorney's fees arising out of or any liability or damages, then in such
resulting therefrom. event, each party shall be liable for a
portion of the damages and claim
3.4 The ENGINEER maintains, at its own costs resulting therefrom equal to such
expense, Worker's Compensation and party's comparative share of the total
Employers Liability, Comprehensive negligence or lawful responsibility for
General Liability, Automobile Liability such damages and claim costs.
and Professional Liability policies with
limits at or above that which is _ 4.3 Hazardous materials or asbestos may
reasonably required of other exist at a site where there is no
engineering firms and will, upon reason to believe they could or should
request, furnish insurance cert~cates be present. The ENGINEER and
to OWNER. OWNER agree that the discovery of
unanticipated hazardous materials or
SECTION 4 -LEGAL RELATIONS asbestos constitutes a changed
condition mandating a renegotiation of
4.1 The ENGINEER shall be responsible ~ ENGINEER's services.
for professional negligence which is
the exercise of skill and ability as 4.4 The ENGINEER has no control over
ordinarily required of engineers under the cost of labor, materials, equipment
the same or similar circumstances. or services furnished by others, or
The ENGINEER shall not be over Contractor's methods of
responsible for warranties, determining prices, or other
guarantees, fitness for a particular competitive bidding or market
purpose or breach of fiduciary duty conditions, practices or bidding
and shall only indemnify for failure to strategies. Cost estimates are based
'
perform in accordance with the on ENGINEER
s opinion based on
generally accepted engineering and experience and judgment. ENGINEER
consulting standards, cannot and does not guarantee that
proposals, bids or actual Project
4.2 OWNER and ENGINEER shall each construction costs will not vary from
defend, indemnify and hold harmless cost estimates prepared by
the other and their respective ENGINEER.
principals, directors, officers and
employees from and against claims, 4.5 If the project involves construction of
loss, liability, suits .and damages, any kind, the parties agree that
including attorney's fees, caused in OWNER and ENGINEER shall be
H:1FinaMAeridianlAgr.doc Page 3 of 5
~J
indemnified to the fullest extent
permitted by law for all claims,
damages, losses and expense
including attorney's fees arising out of
or resulting from Contractor's
performance of work including injury
to any worker on the job site except
for the sole negligence of OWNER or
ENGINEER. Both OWNER and
ENGINEER shall be named as
additional primary insureds) by
Contractor's General Liability and
Builders All Risk insurance policies
without offset and all Construction
Documents and insurance certificates
shall include wording acceptable to
the parties herein with reference to
such provisions.
4.6 ENGINEER shall not be responsible
for the means, methods, techniques,
sequences, or procedures of
construction selected by contractors
or the safety precautions and
programs incident to the work of
contractors and will not be responsible
for Contractor's failure to carry out
work in accordance with the Contract
Documents.
4.7 The services to be performed by
ENGINEER are intended solely for the
benefit of the OWNER. No person or
entity not a signatory to this
Agreement shall be entitled to rely on
the ENGINEER's performance of its
services hereunder, and no right to
assert a claim against the ENGINEER
by assignment of indemnity rights or
otherwise shall accrue to a third party
as a result of this Agreement or the
performance of the ENGINEER's
services hereunder.
4.8 The ENGINEER's instruments of
service hereunder are the printed hard
copy drawings and specifications
issued for the Project, whereas
electronic media, including CADD
files, are tools for their preparation. As
a convenience to the OWNER, the
i
ENGINEER shall furnish to the
OWNER both printed hard copies and
electronic media. In the event of a
conflict in their content, the printed
hard copies shall take precedence
over the electronic media.
Because data stored in electronic
media form can be altered,
inadvertently, it is agreed that the
OWNER shall hold ENGINEER
harmless from liability arising out of
changes or modifications to
ENGINEER's data in electronic media
form in the OWNER's possession or
released to others by the OWNER.
SECTION 5 -TERMINATION OF
AGREEMENT
5.1 If this Agreement is terminated with or
without cause, in either event,
OWNER shall provide:
a. not less than five (5) working
days' written notice of intent to
terminate, and
b. an opportunity for good faith
consultation prior to termination.
SECTION 6 -DISPUTE RESOLUTION
6.1 All claims, disputes, and other matters
in controversy between OWNER and
ENGINEER arising out of or in any
way related to this Agreement will be
submitted to Alternative Dispute
Resolution (ADR) before, and as a
condition precedent to other remedies
provided by law. The method for
resolving disputes will be agreed to
between the parties and each party
shall use its best efforts to reach a
resolution.
SECTION 7 -ENTIRE AGREEMENT
7.1 This Agreement, including
attachments incorporated herein by
reference, represents the entire
H:1Flna~MeridianVlgr.doc Page 4 of 5
Agreement and understanding
between the parties and any
negotiations, proposals or oral
agreements are intended to be
integrated herein and to be
superseded by this written
Agreement. Any supplement or
amendment to this Agreement to be
effective shall be in writing and signed
by the OWNER and ENGINEER.
SECTION 8 -GOVERNING LAW
8.1 This Agreement is to be governed by
and construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of Idaho.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the parties have signed in
confirmation of this Agreement, with effective date the day and year first above written.
CAROLLO ENGINEERS,
A Professional Corporation
BY~ ~~~ ~~
OWNER
By: ~.t~` ~a~~~
Public Works
sy:
By:
sy:
Mayor
City Clerk
Approved by Council:
H:~FinanMeridianv\gr.doc Page 5 of 5
TASK ORDER NO. 1
CITY OF MERIDIAN (OWNER)
AND
CAROLLO ENGINEERS, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION (ENGINEER)
This Task Order is issued by the OWNER and accepted by the ENGINEER pursuant to
the mutual promises, covenants and conditions in the Agreement between the above
named parties dated the in connection with:
Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Plan Update Project (Project).
PURPOSE
The ENGINEER's scope of services, time of completion and compensation shall be as
set forth herein. Services shall generally be described as engineering services for
completion of a Facilities Planning Document for the OWNER's wastewater treatment
plant.
ENGINEER'S SERVICES
Services shall be generally described as those necessary for completion of a Facilities
Planning Document. The document will be intended to meet the requirements of Idaho
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) for wastewater facilities State Revolving
Loan program. Aside from DEQ's requirements, the completed document will also serve
as a preliminary design report, including planning-level drawings of treatment plant
processes, ready to proceed to design. At this time, it is assumed that the current
construction projects at the existing plant will accommodate peak monthly average flows
of 9.1 mgd, and the existing site on Ten-Mile Road will accommodate new structures and
processes to increase peak monthly average flow capacity to at least 15.0 mgd. The new
processes recommended in the plan will also be intended to meet new limits, anticipated
as a result of the current TMDL studies being completed for Five Mile Creek, the Lower
Boise River, and the Snake River/Brownlee Reservoir.
TASK 1 -PROJECT MANAGEMENT
ENGINEER will provide the following project management services for the duration of
the project:
1.1 -Work Plan. Establish a project work plan including budget and schedule based
upon this Task Order No. 1.
1.2 - Management. Manage the efforts of the project team members and
subconsultants, assign manpower, delegate responsibilities, review work progress,
report percent complete, and communicate with OWNER.
-1-
1.3 -Project Meetings. Attend project meetings with OWNER. Prepare agenda and
meeting materials. Prepare and distribute meeting minutes. Our proposed schedule
includes the following meetings:
^ One project kickoff meeting with City staff and DEQ.
^ Six meetings to discuss alternatives during preparation of the technical memos.
^ Two meetings during preparation of the facility plan report.
^ One City Council Presentation.
^ One Public Hearing.
1.4 -Facility Tours. Arrange and attend up to three days of facility tours at wastewater
treatment plants with City staff to investigate new treatment technologies. Prepare
descriptions and document comments from tours.
TASK 2 -BASIS OF PROCESS SELECTION
The purpose of this task is to collect information, project future flows and loadings for
treatment and biosolids disposal needs, and to provide a technical memorandum
summarizing the planning criteria, which will be the basis for completion of Tasks 3 and
4, below.
2.1-Data Collection. Review updated flow and pollutant loading data from the last three
years, which will be used to evaluate the wastewater treatment facilities. Review
OWNER's current Sewer System Master Plan as well as OWNER-provided population
projections and future land-use data.
2.2 -Flow and Loading Projections. Use data collected in Task 2.1 to project the future
flow and pollutant loading capacity requirements of the wastewater treatment plant.
Project future requirements over a 20-year planning period, and correlate with the City-
provided growth projections to estimate timing of required improvements up to the
ultimate capacity of approximately 15.0 mgd peak month average flow on the Ten-Mile
plant site. Conduct up to two workshops with City Public Works and Planning
Department staff, and include ENGINEER's specialty planning subconsultant (Karen
Johnson) to review projections. Define a growth curve envelope with maximum and
minimum expected growth projections.
2.3 -Discharge Regulations Review and Summary. Evaluate the existing NPDES
permit and potential new regulations, based on current information from the Idaho DEQ
TMDL allocations for Five Mile Creek, the Lower Boise River, and the Snake
River/Brownlee Reservoir. Include potential revisions to nutrient discharge regulations
and potential changes in biosolids disposal regulations. Conduct workshop with DEQ
and ENGINEERS's specialty subconsultant for water quality (Tonya Dumbrowski) to
summarize the potential regulatory impacts to process alternative evaluations.
2.4 -Solids Balance and Biosolids Projections. Use ENGINEER's existing biological
model to project future biosolids production, stabilization and disposal requirements.
2.5 -Plant Hydraulic Profile. Update the plant's base hydraulic profile, using the
projected flow scenarios from Task 2.1. The limits of the new profile will be used when
considering addition of new hydraulic structures, and tie-ins to existing collection and
-2-
outfall facilities. Construct profile for peak-hour and average flow scenarios.
2.6 -Write Technical Memorandum. Based on the above sub-tasks, prepare a
technical memorandum, which sets the basic design criteria to be used in development
and evaluation of altematives for increasing the treatment plant capacity. The
memorandum will include relevant information from each of the above sub-tasks.
Discuss contents of memorandum with City staff (in meeting described above in Task
1.3), and incorporate City input in the memorandum.
TASK 3 -TECHNICAL MEMORANDA
Based on the information generated in Task 2, above, prepare a series of technical
memoranda for the future treatment plant facility improvements. The following
memoranda will be completed:
3.1 -Liquid Process Selection. This memorandum will state the design criteria
affecting liquid stream process sizing, evaluate the useful life and capacity of existing
tankage and equipment, then develop and evaluate altematives for meeting the future
design conditions from Task 2. Redundancy in each process area will be evaluated, as
will the ~Do Nothingp altemative, as required under DEQ's procedures for facility plan
development. Preliminary capital and 08~M cost estimates for altematives will be
developed and compared.
The memorandum will compare several altemative liquid process trains, using the
existing process model as a benchmark and starting point for altemative development.
Based on our initial review of treatment capacity and needs, liquid stream altematives to
be developed will include primary treatment, conventional activated sludge, membrane
bioreactors, and advanced membrane treatment altematives. Headworks, pumping
system, and disinfection system altematives will also be developed and evaluated in this
memorandum. In addition, the odor generating potential of altematives will be assessed
and used in the comparison and ranking of altematives, using atmospheric and odor
modeling information previously prepared by ENGINEER.
Following development of liquid process stream altematives, a workshop will be
conducted to compare and evaluate the altematives. The °Paired Wise" selection
process will be used to weigh selection criteria, then rank the altematives based on the
weighted criteria. The results of the evaluation and the workshop will be summarized in
the technical memorandum.
3.2 - Biosolids Process Selection. Using the information from Task 2 and the
parameters from the process selected in Task 3.1, update the plant's biological model to
project future solids production. Evaluate altematives for solids thickening, stabilization
and re-use. Include alternatives that maximize the use of the planned anaerobic
digestion and solids drying processes, and compare to other altematives for hauling and
land application of biosolids. Conduct a workshop to discuss altematives and a second
workshop to compare and evaluate developed alternatives. Prepare technical
memorandum to summarize evaluation and workshop results.
3.3 -Plant Utility Systems. Evaluate plant utility systems, including electrical,
instrumentation, natural gas, potable and plant water supply. Recommend improvements
-3-
•
and additions to these systems, as required to support the recommended new process
improvements. It is anticipated that the deliverables for this memorandum will include an
update to the non-potable water system site plan, an overall electrical single-line diagram
for the plant, and a block diagram for the plant SCADAsystem - all of these deliverables
will show both the existing system and the recommended upgrades. Conduct electrical
distribution system analysis, including evaluation of altematives for a second powerfeed
to the plant, and capacity of standby power system to meet new loads. Summarize
evaluation and workshop results in a technical memorandum.
3.4 -Financing Plan. Conduct financing kickoff meeting with ENGINEER's staff and
subconsultant, and the OWNER's Public Works staff and finance manager. Develop
finance altematives and schedule, and project potential impacts to project timing, rates
and connection fees. Conduct workshop to discuss and evaluate altematives, and
complete technical memorandum to summarize results.
TASK 4 -FACILITY PLAN REPORT PREPARATION
4.1 -Executive Summary This task includes completion of an executive summary,
which directs the reader to the pertinent sections of the technical memoranda described
above. The executive summary (and the memoranda as attachments) will be assembled
as a Draft Final Report, togetherwith the appropriate environmental documentation and
other required documents for submittal to and approval by DEQ. The reportwill include a
schedule for timing of the required improvements, based on the plant's peak month
average flow value, and based on anticipated regulatory requirements. The report will
include an estimate of project phasing costs and of total project cost.
4.2 -Environmental Assessment. An environmental assessment (e.g., Environmental
Information Document) of the recommended facilities plan will be prepared in
accordance with DEQ requirements. The following will be completed under this task:
4.2.1 -Data Collection
Collect and compile pertinent data. Information will be collected on site conditions,
wetlands, flood plain, vegetation, wildlife, soils, population, economics, cultural
resources, and additional data needed to fully describe the project and its impacts.
4.2.2 -Prepare Draft Environmental Document
Prepare a draft environmental document that identifies purpose and need. for project,
describes baseline conditions, project action(s), altematives to the proposed action,
environmental impacts, and mitigation measures. Submit draft report to City and DEQ for
review and comment.
4.2.3 - Acaency Consultation/Coordination
Consult federal, state, and local agencies as needed to obtain data necessary for report
and to obtain necessary review comments.
4.2.4 -Public Notification and Hearing
Prepare a notification advertising the availability of the environmental report for review.
Submit the notification to the city for advertisement in a local newspaper. The public
comment period will extend for 30 days after publication. ENGINEER will attend and
participate in a public hearing and City~Council presentation held to discuss the project,
-4-
•
impacts, and any proposed mitigation measures.
4.2.5- Final Environmental Document
Prepare a final environmental document that incorporates agency, public, and city
comments as applicable. The final document will be astand-alone document that can be
inserted into the facilities plan report as an appendix.
Assumptions
The following assumptions were made in developing the services for preparing an
environmental assessment:
Agency consultation will be limited to two rounds of contact: one for data collection and
one to solicit comments on the draft document.
The environmental report will be adopted as the environmental assessment by DEQ.
The project will be issued a Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
A biological assessment and wetlands delineation will not be required.
The City will provide all DEQ-required analysis for the collection system portion.
The City will prepare the financial portion of the report, including funding mechanisms
and any required rate projection and analysis. ENGINEER will review these documents
and include them in the final report.
4.3 -Other DEQ Requirements/Checklists/Meetings. This task includes an allowance
for other items that may be required by DEQ, as a result of DEQ's initial review of the
facility plan. These requirements may include items such as assembling collection
system and financial information as supplied by the City, or unanticipated tasks such as
amore in-depth discussion of potential reuse sites or feasibility of combining facilities
with recreational uses. This task also provides an allowance for responding to written
questions or comments from DEQ or from issues that result from the public meeting
process, and preparing a final, approved Facility Plan Report approved by DEQ.
PROJECT DELIVERABLES
The following deliverables will be prepared as part of the project:
A. Basis of Process Selection Memorandum (5 copies).
B. Four Technical Memoranda (5 copies).
C. Draft Facility Plan Report (5 copies to the city, 2 copies to the state DEQ).
D. Final Facility Plan Report (5 copies to the city, 2 copies to the state DEQ).
E. Project Meeting Minutes. (5 copies).
-5-
SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE OWNER
OWNER will provide the following services to support ENGINEER in completion of the
above tasks:
0.1 -Operating Data. Assemble previous three-years of treatment plant and biosolids
program operating data for use by ENGINEER to summarize and use in process
evaluations.
0.2 -Reports and Drawings. Provide copies of previous reports, facility as-built
drawings and utility information for use in component evaluations.
0.3 -Collection System Analysis. Provide collection system master plan components,
as required by DEQ, for submission of a complete Facility Plan Report. (ENGINEER will
include this information in draft and final report).
0.4 -Survey Information. Provide land survey information in electronic format to define
topography, property lines, utilities, etc. for proposed site of improvements.
0.5 -Growth/Population Information. Provide information on population projections,
identify the future areas of impact, and identify future residential, commercial and
industrial growth as relates to increased wastewater flow and loading.
0.6 -Financial Analysis. Provide financial information~as required for DEQ submittal of
facility plan, including financing options and plan for costs estimated by ENGINEER, and
support from City finance department for DEQ-required rate impact analysis.
0.7 -Review and Comment. Provide timely review of ENGINEER's deliverables, to
incorporate City comments and information into draft and final reports.
TIME OF COMPLETION
Estimated Notice to Proceed: January 27, 2006
Estimated Completion of the Design Criteria Memorandum: February 28, 2006
Estimated Completion of the Draft Facility Plan Report: July 7, 2006
Estimated Completion of the Final Facility Plan Report: October 3, 2006
The ENGINEER will pertorm its services in a manner that will permit the OWNER to
meet this schedule unless delayed due to a cause beyond the ENGINEER's control.
-6-
C~
COMPENSATION
OWNER shall pay ENGINEER on an hourly basis in accordance with the attached
engineering cost estimate and fee schedule (Exhibits A and B). Subconsultants shall be
invoiced at ENGINEER's cost plus ten (10) percent. All other direct costs shall be
invoiced at the actual cost. ENGINEER's total compensation for the Scope of Services
identified in this Task order shall not exceed the amount of two hundred sixty nine
thousand dollars ($269,000), without additional authorization from OWNER. The
ENGINEER shall submit monthly statements to the OWNER based on the ENGINEER's
labor and expenses accrued at the time of billing. OWNER shall make monthly payments
in response to ENGINEER's statement.
EFFECTIVE DATE
This Task Order No. 1 is effective as of the day of , 2006.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the ENGINEER and of
the OWNER have executed this Task Order No. 1 evidencing its issuance by
OWNER and acceptance by ENGINEER.
CAROLLO ENGINEERS,
A Professional Corporation
By:
Q rFncr
OWNER
By:
Public Works
By:
By:
Mayor
By:
City Clerk
Approved by Council:
-7-
•
F
O
U
C7
Q W
W
FTa O
W
H
F
W
F
U
~i
a
p~
zD
a
W
0
0
N
O
S]DOg j8{O,L ~ '~ ~ O O ~ N N N O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O O
O M Y1 N ~D 7 t7 h h M~~ .~. `~ ~
F N
O O O~ 00 OD N M M t~
~O N h~ OO ~A M O~ O~ VN1 h O o0 h M b
_ M O ~-r M ~D ~O e+1 O l~ N ~ ~O O~ l ~ O .-r V'f P
O ~SO~ ~O,L N vi O~ l~ N ~ r ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~
(.y '. N
69 Y3 69 ff3 (f3 69 EH 64 b9 69 69 69 H9 69 b9 69 69 d9 ~.
U ~aT~Td O O O O O 0 0 O
h N N
A '"
vi ~ va ~ ds ~ es tfi
d
0 y
[BLIBj'a3~5' 00 00 ,"O~ N .N~ 00 00 ~
H
~ >
stage[Q~aa~[saQ ~ ~ `, 0 00 0°o v°~ N eNn °~ ~ ~ F
N W
O
s
'~y~' ~ iosrnPd [eo?m{oa.L ~ ~' ~°. °N v °° o°°o m
O c
p~ q .SQnj/UB¢BdBIE11 N '~t N l'V
o ios[npd ~M(oay °O et v M N N o0 o a
w
182IIf8Q~ USTSBQ ~ op 00 oD o0 00 pOp ~ ~ ~ N N °D M
M
Iaa-~S$;92COS(j 00 ~ ,a N °~ ~ N ~ :~ .~. N N eN'i M h o00 N ~ 63
addl~BZ IQ[Z ~ 00 00 a' ~ oo tt ~ N N O 'V' tt oo ~ o0 00 ~
72H8llBj~;02CO.id ~ N a' N N .-~ N
~ ~ ~
b ~ ~
O ~ 4'
p. `~ ~ ~p '~ a ~ ''~ q Ow U w
vv~~ `~ ~ .
_ C '~ o
W ~ ~ba o04eC ~ ~ ¢ ~ a ~ ~ F
A a e~ eor~ba~ A ~3~, a ~.~ O ;,
~3~aw ,~A~Av~c,3 „~acaa.ir. ~wwo
~ .-• N t~1 `0; ~ ^' N M ~ v1 ~ ~ .. N M of ~ .-~ N M
F^' FcV cV cV(V cV cV FMrir'ic+i [~a'a'ef
•
~
O e
ti
~
~
~
N
a
(. ~ +
. N
~
_ ~~8~ O O O O O O O -=
__
Q
~~^~S o 0 0
0 0 0 o S
~ id
lo~i'3 e o 0 o e e oo `~ ~ oo ~
~e~etoaaS o0 00 0o eo 0o ae o0 00 00 00 0o ao 00 0o b
U
y
a
i
~
St2$BIQ~6Ei091S2((
~••~
eN+l
VO'
.~•~
~
~
~
M
R
~
b
~
~O
~G
~
OD
o0
ti
~
~
~ GG
G
~~,s~x s
d IOS.~d ~~~Q~~ N N 'a O R 'V• ~ N ~ 'd' O O O
W
O
goagsy 8!az~
U ~o~Pd ~~[~.~. C' N N a0 @ N N aD C N ~ N ~ „Ny oo N N C N N 00 7 N N aD ~ V
`~
]~UIRU31181ba([ R N ~ ~ b 'V N M .N. b W ~ tN+1 .N. a ~ N fN~1 .N. b ~ ~ eN~l .N. ~ ~ N .N~. IN/1 00 .Nr ~ b ~ a
~aam8ag l~Cold v ,`O„ oo oo h V oo oo oo N oo `^ oc `^ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ V ~O V oo N sY er oo ~ 7 ^ 00 0 0
~"°"°ri ~•~ N 00 ~ ` 0' W 00 V ~' ~ N ~ ' R 00 ~ N 00 R V' ~ N ~ 00 V' ~ a0 00 N N
N
~D
Q
~f
~„~
~
trl
E
Y
E E
z ~ a ~
~
~
d
'G
~
q
~
~ •
O
s
pp
9
_
O
Ey
c '
p
C
~ ~
cQ
o
p
p
`°
P~.
O
d
c
Q
m
~
C~
Ri
c
p
~
~ ri
Y
E
~
p
C
~
'a
U
a e
si E
o "
0 c
o E
as E
o G
o ~"
a E a •
o Og
o @
~ ~ ~ •
o ro~. ~ E ~
8 v
~ ~ ~
8 ~
S ~ ~ m
E ~
S ,~
~
A ~ a >i ~ ~ . $
d • o d ~ m
d v ' d o
y b c
S o
~ _
y ~ S ~ ~
y pp
gy S yg
~ > ~ y U
C ` ° ~ ~ v
` ° E a
i ~ a
i ^~ 3 . p a
i
~ i
a ~ ~
~
Q Q
~ ' S c
~
~ q
~ . ~ m '
_ ~ •
~ o
~
~ ..
.
F ~ a
>
„
° '
m
~
. ~
a. ~ '
o [
„ ~
. ~
_ ~
~ ~
d v
~ .
, • ~ •
as i .
a
d sy
W • ~
- uJ ~
~
m • m
- ~
L
~" o•
3 ao.
c S
c c O U~ = 1
~ O~ c e v. 5
o ~
a f ,
~ F v~• S _
~ A . fi b G ~ m
O ~
~ ~ a ~ O ~ ~ c ~; q c°'•
~
o
~ a y
o ~ R
Z o
v m
w ~' e ~ Q
J
p
~ E m
~ ~
c d
~ Q
m ~
a o m
C aoi
p' ,, ~'
0. W d
'
f a L
G
G m d
' Q L
n.
x a h .
U .
o p„ a h Cg o °
~ ' p
z ~ n U ~
,
o ,,
E °i
., °
a °
v~ 4 '
U ••
o °
Ci ' _o
r 0
n 0 ~
U ..
o o
W c
0
a .
0
vi 0
U 4.
o
~ q
o
a ~ ~
n
n o ~
U ..
o
~ >
a
V > o
a ~
m E
~
e ~
y
o >
~ >
-
•W o
-a
~
~ ~ >
-
c ~ >
'a o
'a
~
`
* d
c a
W >
~ o
~
~
v; ~'
-
~ >
m >
~ o
~
~
~ a°i
^• ~
= as
> c
o
a
m ,' y
o d
>
~• d
>
: a
o
a
~
~ ~ g d a
a ~
Y ~ ~ d E
m a ~ g
~ m
~ `~ a
a ~ v ~ `° Y m ~ a s ~ m m pp
a ~ ~
F
GQ
Qn ,
.m
FO
Q
Q
n
.rn
F 5
oa
a
a
ri
F 3
A
Q
4
au a
'~
E
ms- ~
O
<
Qo
~,r
'n
F g
O d
Q d
Q ,
o, fl
u~
F ~
O °~
«
n ~
.v e
~
January 13, 2006
•
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2~b
APPLICANT ITEM NO. S•~
REQUEST Tabled from January 1 p, 20p6 -Contract for Wastewater Treatment Plan
Project Task Order No. ~& with Caro}lo Engineers
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER: See al#ached
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
GIN BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date: Phone:
Staff Initials:
Materials presenh3d at public meetings ahaU become properly of the City ~ Meridian.
~J
Memo
To: 1Ndliam Berg, Jr.; Tara Green
Frare Clint Dolsby, P.E., StafF Engineer
CC: Brad 1A/atsan, P.E., Public Works Director
Dx~te: 01/12i2~
Re: Proposed Agenda Items for January 17, 2006 City Cowl Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following items be plac~l on ~
January 17 City Ccuancil agenda, under consent ~, for Counal's consideration:
Bud~aet Amendment, -Wastewater TreaP~ant Fagrrfii Plan,_,_,pdate Proms. We are
requesting a budget amendrr~rrt, along with creation of a new line item, for the 1Nastevvater
Treatment Plant Facility Plan Update Projc~'. This amendment will atlow us to enter into
contract with an engineering corrsultarrt during this budge# year th corrrpfete the facifiiy plan
update for the future expansion of the wastewater treatrnerrt plant This FaaUty Plan Study is
for a new fi~+atrnent train on the west side of tt~ existing site. We are requesting an
amendment ten percent larger than the engineering cxfntrac~ to aocxwnt for uncertainties with
the selection of processes for a new trea~rrt train ~ the west portion of the site that
currently does not have any faali~s.
This budget amendment is for completion of the faality plan docxrment in the amount of
$x,000.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Worl~s Department reacommends that City
Council approves ~ bud~t amendment for the Wasbewate~ Treai~m®nt Plant Facility
Plan Update Pmt th amount of $300, for FY .
Wastewater T~re~rent Piamt Faa'IitX Plate Update. Proie~. Caraito Engineers has submitted
a task cider, scope of work, and budget for this facility planning document They propose to
compete the work for $269,000. This is a result of the sei~on of Carollo Engineers faun
their proposal that was received by the Public Works Department on November 2, 2005.
This project shall be generally described as seniices n~assary for completion of a Faalities
Planning Document The docxrment will be intended to meet the re~riremerrts of Idaho
Department of Envir~orrmentai Quality (DEQ) for wastewater fac+l"fies Slate Revolving Loan
• Page 1
•
program. Aside from DEQ's requinsmer~ss, oompleted document wilt alp serve as a
preliminary design repork including planning-~vel drawings of tteatme~ plant processes,
ready to proceed to des~n.
Recommended Council Action: The Pubbc Works Department n~:ommends
that City Council approves the contract for the Wastewater Treatment Plant
Facility Plan Update Project with Carollo Engineers for $269, and authorise
the RAayor to sign it.
Wastewater Treatment Plant t:..x,~ansion Project Task Q~ No. 4. Carollo Engineers has
submitted a task order, scope of work, and budget for phis design project basil on updated
population projections. They prose to complete the work for X515,749. This is an
extension of the agreement between ~ City of Meridian and Caroilo Engineers approved by
City Council on the ~~' of October, 2004 for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
Project.
This project oonststs of the design of a t ;entri#uge, Anaerobic Digester No. 4 and No. 5,
Biosolids Dryer Storage Silos, a digester gas storage facility and ultn3violet disinfection
expansion to matdi ~ build-out cap~ityt of the liquid-phase treatrrfenfi. Digester 4 arxf 5 will
provide digestion capaaty such that the original Digesters 1 and 2 may be taken out of
service.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Departrrient recomn~ands
that City Council approves contract for the Wastewater Treatment Plant
Expansion Project Task Order No. 4 wil#~ Carotlo Engineers for $515,749 and
au~orize the tlAayor to sign i#.
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regaradirrg
any of these items.
~ Page 2
y*d ~ •
TASK ORDER N0.4
CITY OF MERIDIAN (OWNER)
AND
CAROLLO ENGINEERS, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION (ENGINEER)
This Task Order is issued by the OWNER and accepted by the ENGINEER pursuant to the
mutual promises, covenants and conditions in the Agreement between the above named
parties dated the day of , 2005, in connection with:
Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Project (Project)
ENGINEER'S SERVICES
The ENGINEER' scope of services, time of completion and compensation shall be as set
forth herein. Services shall generally be described as engineering design of the OW NER's
wastewater treatment plant.
PURPOSE
This Task Order amends the scope and schedule in Task Orders 1 and 2, to provide
design and bidding services for the Biosolids Improvements phase of the Wastewater
Treatment Plant (V1iWTP) Expansion. This Task Order includes construction of
Anaerobic Digester No. 4 and No. 5 to match the build-out capacity of the wastewater
liquid-phase treatment. Digester 4 and 5 will provide digestion capacity such that the
original Digesters 1 and 2 may 6e taken out of service.
TASK 1 -PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The additional management provided under this Task Order to be included in the
Biosolids Improvements Project shall consist of the following:
1.1. Project Coordination and Work Plan
1. Internal coordination, contracting, and scheduling of discipline engineers
and subconsultants associated with addition of Anaerobic Digester No. 5
and with other modifications of existing W WTP components covered in this
Task Order.
2. ENGINEER will prepare a Work Plan to include project communication
standards, file and document management, and quality assurance
procedures for the duration of the project.
1.2. Progress Reporting
1. ENGINEER will provide monthly report cost spreadsheet with details of
charges for services provided for the duration of the project.
TASK 2 -DESIGN SERVICES
The additional design elements under this Task Order to be included in the Biosolids
Improvements Project shall consist of the following:
-1-
• •
2.1. Anaerobic Digester Expansion
1. Addition of Anaerobic Digester No. 5 will be included under this Task Order
to provide redundancy with the new Anaerobic Digester No. 4.
2. Anaerobic Digesters are estimated as 507,000 gallon capacity, cast-in-place
concrete tank, including fixed steel cover, draft tube mixers with external
heat exchangers.
3. Digester cover options will be presented with alternatives for external
digester gas storage, to optimize gas storage as the fuel source for the
biosolids dryer.
4. The design of the Digester Building is expanded to include the boilers,
heating facilities and circulation pumps, sludge transfer pumps, gas
handling and conditioning equipment, and the electrical motor control center
(MCC) to accommodate the electrical power for Anaerobic Digesters 1 and
2, as well as Digesters 4 and 5.
2.2. Existing Anaerobic Digester Modilfications
1. The existing mechanical room for Digester No. 3 will be modified to
construct a separate electrical MCC room with isolated entrance to separate
potential gas hazards. Based on existing building dimensions and
doorways, one ingress/egress will lead to the electrical room, and one
ingress/egress wil{ lead to the mechanical room.
2. The third progressing cavity Digested Sludge Dewatering Pump will be
installed in the mechanical building, with seal water connections, and
controls.
3. The existing Boiler 1 will be investigated to determine the remaining
effective service life. Cost estimates to relocate Boiler 1 to the new Digester
4 and 5 Control Building will be prepared, including costs to upgrade the
burner control module with maintenance and servicing for internal tubes and
insulation. The effective life and rehabilitation costs for Boiler 1 will be
compared to the costs of a new boiler sized for the projected digester
loading. Digester boilers and heating loop will be modrfied to serve all
existing and proposed tanks.
-2-
t ( ~ •
2.3. Biosolids Centrifuge Dewatering Expansion
1. Under this Task Order, ENGINEER will pre-negotiate the scope of supply
and cost to provide a second Andritz centrifuge, complete with controls
integrated into the dryer package, for redundancy and to match the existing
dewatering equipment. The pre-negotiated centrifuge will be included in the
drawings and specifications for installation under the Biosolids
Improvements Project.
2. Design will include all structural supports, access stairs and platforms,
mechanical piping connections, centrifuge discharge screw conveyors,
electrical and instrumentation, with utility water and all accessories.
2.4. Biosolids Drying Facility
1 Under this Task Order design of the dryer system (Andritz, Model DDS 20)
is amended to include firvo (2) wet storage hoppers and redundant wet cake
feed pumps for two centrifuges.
2 Screw conveyor system will be included to transfer sludge cake from the
centrifuges into the wet cake hoppers for the dryer feed.
3. This Task Order includes additional services to conduct air dispersion
modeling as part of the technical data for the required air quality permit
associated with the Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO) system included
in the dryer procurement package for odor control. Under this task,
ENGINEER will compile background data from the biosolids and the
proposed dryer performance data, to prepare and submit applications to
Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, for a Permit to Construct the
dryer facilities.
2.5. Ultraviolet Disinfection Expansion
1. A procurement package consisting of bidding documents and technical
specifications will be provided for the OWNER to directly purchase addition
ultraviolet (UV) disinfection modules, to expand the disinfection process to
equal the build-out peak hour flow capacity.
2. New UV modules will be turned-over to the general contractor currently
engaged in the WWTP Expansion Project for installation into the existing
disinfection basin channels.
3. The existing UV disinfection basin will be modified with a new open-channel
inlet to accommodate the build-out peak hour flow capacity. A contract
change order with drawings and specification will be provided to the general
contractor currently engaged in the WWTP Expansion Project.
4. ENGINEER will conduct and investigation to confirm that adequate power
supply and electrical connections are available to accommodate the added
UV modules. Findings of the investigation will be provided in a letter report.
Additional electrical design, if required, will be defined under a separate
task.
TASK 3 -BID PERIOD ASSISTANCE
This task includes amended services for bidding period assistance, related to the additional
scope and added drawings and specifications in the Biosolids improvements Project.
The ENGINEER will deliver completed, original bidding documents to the OWNER. The
OWNER will be responsible for printing and distribution of plans and specifications to
-3-
i •
potential bidders. This task order covers the following added services during the bidding
phases:
Addenda Preparation. Responses to bidder inquires shall be provided, and as appropriate,
addenda shall be prepared and delivered to OWNER. OWNER shall distribute addenda to
plan holders.
Conformed Drawings and Specifications. ENGINEER shall provide conformed drawings
and specifications to include all changes made by addenda during bidding. Conformed
drawings and specifications will be prepared within 21 days after Notice-to-Proceed with
construction. Engineer shall provide one conformed full-size set of drawings, one conformed
half-size set of drawings, and one conformed set of specifications to the OWNER, for
reproduction.
TASK 4 -OPTIMIZATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES
This task includes general labor to investigate additional design details that may be identified
through the course of the project, related to unforeseen conditions in the existing facilities,
not covered in this Task Order.
The ENGINEER will only charge to the optimization task only after the added scope is
defined in detail and all design services and deliverables are agreed and authorized in
writing with the OWNER.
PROJECT DELIVERABLES
The following deliverables will be prepared as part of the project:
Biosolids Treatment (solids-phase) Expansion:
A. Preliminary Design Submittal (5 copies to the City).
B. Boiler Evaluation Design Memorandum (5 copies to the City).
C. Mid-Point Design Submittal (5 copies to the City).
D. Final Design Submittal
(5 copies to the City, 3 copies to the state DEQ).
E. Final Design Submittal (1 original to the City).
F. Cost Estimate at Preliminary, Mid-Point, and Final Design.
Addenda (1 original to the City).
Meeting Minutes (to all meeting attendees).
Periodic design review workshops will be conducted with the OWNER through the
course of the project. Content of each workshop will include:
1. Preliminary Design Workshop
A. Process Flow Diagrams
1. Solids Handling
2. Hot Water System
3. Digester Gas
4. (Preliminary) Biosolids Dryer
5. Boiler Evaluation Design Memorandum
B. Site Plan
C. Mechanical Plan View of all major process areas and buildings
-4-
•
D. Draft Process and Instrument Diagrams
E. Draft Control Descriptions
F. Electrical Single Line and Electrical Site Plan
G. Specification Table of Contents
1. Draft Major Equipment Sections
11. Mid-Point Design Workshop
A. Final Process Flow Diagrams
B. Process and Instrument Diagrams and Control Descriptions
C. Site Plans
1. Coordinates, Paving and Grading
2. Yard Piping Plan and Details
D. Structural and Mechanical Plan View and Main Sections of all process
areas and buildings
E. Draft Specifications
111. Final Design Workshop
A. Final Process Flow Diagram
B. Process and Instrument Diagrams and Control Descriptions
C. Site Plans
1. Coordinates, Paving and Grading
2. Yard Piping Plan and Details
D. Structural Plans Sections and Details
E. Mechanical Plan Sections and Details
F. Electrical and Instrumentation Plan Sections and Details
G. Final Specifications
SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE OWNER
OWNER will provide the following services to support ENGINEER in completion of the
above tasks:
0.1 -Review and Comment. Provide timely review of ENGINEER's deliverables, to
incorporate City comments and information into final design, during the workshops to be
conducted as described under Task 1.
0.2 -Facility Documentation. Provide necessary information from previous projects and
from plant operating data for ENGINEER to complete all above tasks. OW NER will payfees
associated with permits for construction of the project from state and local agencies.
0.3 -Bid Document Distribution. OWNER will print final design bid documents and
addenda (based on originals provided by ENGINEER) and distribute to interested bidders,
during the bid period.
-5-
i •
SCHEDULE
The project schedule for the Biosolids Improvements Project.
TIME OF COMPLETION
The target project milestones for completion are:
Biosolids Dryer Procurement Documents
Advertise Final Procurement Documents January 16, 2006
Estimated Bid Opening March 15, 2005
Biosolids Improvements Project:
Preliminary Design Documents February 15, 2006
Mid-Point Design Contract Documents April 5, 2006
Final Design Contract Documents June 21, 2006
Advertise and Project Bidding July 12, 2006
Estimated Bid Opening August 30, 2007
The ENGINEER will perform its services in a manner that will permit the OWNER to meet
this schedule unless delayed due to a cause beyond the ENGINEER's control, at which time
the ENGINEER's compensation may be subject to an increase.
COMPENSATION
OWNER shall pay ENGINEER on an hourly basis in accordance with the attached
engineering cost estimate and fee schedule (Exhibits A and B). Subconsuttants shall be
invoiced at ENGINEER's cost plus ten (10) percent. All other direct costs shall be invoiced at
the actual cost. ENGINEER's total compensation for the Scope of Services identified in this
Task order shall not exceed the amount of five hundred fifteen thousand eight hundred
dollars ($515,800) without additional authorization from OWNER. The ENGINEER shall
submit monthly statements to the OWNER based on the ENGINEER's labor and expenses
accrued at the time of billing. OWNER shall make monthly payments in response to
ENGINEER's statement.
-6-
i
EFFECTIVE DATE
This Task Order No. 4 is effective as of the day of
2005.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the ENGINEER and of the
OWNER have executed this Task Order No. 4 evidencing its issuance by OWNER and
acceptance by ENGINEER.
CAROLLO ENGINEERS, OWNER
A Professional Corporation
By: By:
Partner
By' By:
Partner
Brad Watson, P.E.
Public Works
Tammy de Weerd, Mayor
By:
William G. Berg Jr
City Clerk
Approved by Council:
-7-
~ ~
Z
yF
t9 ~ ~
v ~ °z
z am
~o~~~
Q F I ' ~
~ ~ ~ x ~
~ W ` F
O
~ ~ ~
°~a~
U ~ ~
h
Q
N
O
uq
~"J IBS
U ~ 8J3d
n7~f31
~~~~
~~ n>~S'
~A~ i@~
BYIJOOp[$IIg WIb'y
Q
3 ~~~
~ ~^!roiaS7°%Y
i
0
sm,mmsaa oa
~~r~.~
~~
~«l~m$
80~]pJlp (etrt,~
~~ ma
u~~~~Q
nameog W!%i~w!
D~ l~?A»~g
°i0!8~H 1~!7S
m~~
°~8 ma
ma¢uq ~(^+d
°~tA'+SmII.
n$wyQ im[ $
Q
F
F N
N m~ N vI n
b
h n
m~ N P N O vl b F P oW0 P Q N
~ p, pp 8 S W V
O O O ~ Q
Q
~ -. .-.
b b tr~ ap ovf~
OG tS ~ pp ~
N ~ O b N .
< N Q tV .F.~ r
N l~ t~ t~j gyp'
tV ~. ~
N
h
!A (9 (9 9 (9 !9 di W M !H (A M (A •9 W (9 tR •9 (9 d! !A H (q M W i9 M dl
O~ O
~ Hmi N{{ O { N{~~ t N~1 N~
(9 ~ f9 W 5~ y b N O N O p V~ ~ pW
N {O~ P O pOp th~ p
I ~ W ~
~
l m
P rS5 jS5
!H t~tt
t
~
(9 (N~I9 (919 ~ N N f9 (q MN ~~
O
W
O ".
of O
~ ~
O
0
N
N N .N...N. r .N..N. G N Q
o .-~ < .. .~.
~
5
fs
N N N N N N b N O N ap
~ ~ Ot~~~a~.o ~Qm .N_.
~` 5
3~
„<N, m,°m~a$ohe me ~~
~
~
~
o~oooot3o~ W m W ~ ~ ~ ~
ovva ~omv~°oaoo~ n ea `~ N ~ ~
.b.. N.N. .Nn .N. ~ m m F tS O v N F
~ R N W ^ ~ rn
v
.~ V . a0 .Nn ti r .Ni m h n .Ni O G m m N N O N N r
b
Q
W N O N W 00 CO ~{ N ~~ ' .p O b N O N~ N N N pp N ~ _
.~.
a ~ ~.IQ~ \ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ L
~ ~~a g~ ~~~ o ~ a~~ ~
5m ~ b~S
~3 ~ ar7 ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ o ~ ~ u
s ~ ~~~~'~`~no~"~~?~
^
~ {
m p
~ O F ,
g '~
~ a ~ ~ m
'~
ffi 9 ~
~
~ N ~ ~ it: rl
°~ '~' ~ ~' N F m x
g3
' m~ffi8 ~~ ~ - x ~
g g KU U
° m m ~~
C m ~ ~ ~ ~ [
g
S o~ A F~ a
Sheet
Drawing Description
L
m ¢ C O
.C
w °J
E., w
~ 1: ~
F, .o a]
0.
SITE PLAN
1 C - 1 Site Plan 0.5
YARD PIPING
2 C- 1 Yard Piping Dig. 3 0.5
3 C- 2 Yard Piping Dig. 4 and 5 0.5
4 C- 2 Digester Gas 0.5
5 C- 2 Misc Details 0.5
DEMOLITION
6 43 D- 3 Demolition Plan -MCC #2 0.5
7 43 D- 4 Demolition Section -Digester No. 1 & 2 Building 0.5
Subtotal Civii and Demo 3.5
DIGESTER 3
Structural Drawings
8 43 S- 1 MCC Room Plan 1.0
9 43 S- 2 MCC Room Sections and Details 1,p
Mechanical Drawings
10 43 M- 1 Dewatering Pump No. 3 Pump -Plan 0.5
11 43 M- 2 Sections & Details & Seal Water 0.0
12 43 M- 3 MCC Romm HVAC Plan & Details 0.5
Subtotal Digester 3 3.0
DIGESTER 5
Structural Drawings
13 25 S 1 Digester Plan 2 0
14 25 S 2 Section & Details
15 25 S 3 Section $ Details
16 25 S 4 Building Ptan 2 0
17 25 S 5 Section & Details
18 25 S 6 Section & Details
19 25 S 7 Section &Detaiis
Mechanical Drawings
20 25 M 1 Digester Plan 2 0
21 25 M 2 Section & DetaDs 1 0
22 25 M 3 Section & Details 1 0
23 25 M 4 Building Plan 2 0
24 25 M 5 Section & Details 1 0
25 25 M 6 Section & Details 1 0
25 25 M 7 Boilers and HRS Loop 0.5
26 25 M 8 HRSMRR Loop 0.5
Subtotal Digester 5 13.0
CENTRIFUGE DEWATERING & WET CAKE STORAGE
Structural Drawings
27 47 S- i Foundation Plan 1 0
28 47 S- 2 Sections ~ Details 0.5
29 47 S- 3 Sections & Details 0.5
30 47 S- 4 Hopper Plan Sections 8~ Details 2.0
Mechanical Drawings
31 47 M- 1 Upper Pian 1 0
32 47 M- 2 Floor Plan 1 0
33 47 M- 3 Sections $ Details 1 0
34 47 M- 4 Sections & Details 1 0
35 47 M- 5 Hopper and Cake Pump Plan 1.0
36 47 M- 6 Sections & Details 1 0
37 47 M- 7 Sections &Detaiis 1 0
38 47 M- 8 NPW 8~ Polymer Schematic and Details 1.p
Subtotal Centrifuge and Wet Cake Storage 12.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
12.0
L
N
C
~ O
~,
+;
C
t
L
~
c
' ~
W rO L
0i C
'~ ~y
L.
O .Yi
m ~
~
•
h
m
W
~ a
~~~
~ ~
U ,~
w
o
~ ~~. w F
o _
w ~ ~ c
v: ~
~
~
4.0 2.0 6.0 0.5 14,p
16.0 40.0 0.5 59.0
16.0 40.0 0.5 59,p
8.0 16.0 0.5 27.0
8.0 16.0 0.5 27.0
4.0 12.0 0.5 20.0
8.0 12.0 0.5 25.0
~•0 142.0 3.5 231.0
4.0 6.0 16.0 24.0 0.5 51,5
2.0 4.0 16.0 16.0 0.5 39.5
B.0 24.0 16.0 2.0 50S
8.0 16.0 16.0 2.0 42.0
8.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 2.0 58.5
30.0 66.0 32.0 16.0 88.0 7.0 0.0 242.0
6.0 2.0 16.0 12.0 0.5 38,5
2.0 2.0 0.5 q,y
2.0 2.0 0.5 4.5
6.0 2.0 16.0 16.0 0.5 42.5
2.0 2.0 0.5 4,5
2.0 2.0 0.5 4,5
2.0 2.0 0.5 4.5
8.0 12.0 12.0 0.5 34,5
4.0 8.0 8.0 0.5 21.5
4.0 8.0 8.0 0.5 P1,y
4.0 8.0 12.0 0.5 26.5
2.0 8.0 4.0 0.5 15.5
2.0 8.0 4.0 0.5 15.5
8.0 16.0 24:0 16.0 64.5
8.0 16.0 24.0 16.0 64.5
52.0 88.0 42.0 0.0 134.0 38.5 367.5
2.0 16.0 24.0 24.0 2.0 69.0
2.0 2.0 16.0 8.0 2.0 30.5
2.0 2.0 16.0 8.0 2.0 30.5
8.0 12.0 16.0 8.0 2.0 48,0
8.0 16.0 12.0 2.0 39.0
8.0 16.0 24.0 2.0 51.0
4.0 12.0 24.0 2.0 43.0
4.0 12.0 16.0 2.0 35.0
8.0 24.0 16.0 2.0 51.0
4.0 8.0 24.0 2.0 39.0
4.0 8.0 16.0 2.0 31.0
4.0 8.0 16.0 2.0 31.0
58.0 136.0 72.0 0.0 196.0 24.0 498.0
2.0
2.0
6.0
0.0
Rev_1_T04_BiosolidsExpanion.xls ~ of 2 12/6/2005
Sheet I Drawing Description
DIGESTER GAS STORAGE
Structural Drawings
39 47 S - 1 Foundation Plan
40 47 S - 2 Sections ~ Details
Mechanical Drawings
41 47 M- 1 Plan
42 47 M- 2 Sections & Details
43 47 M- 3 Sections & Details
Subtotal Digester Gas Storage
ELECTRICAL
44 E- 1 Site Plan
45 E- 1 Single Line
Digester No.1 and 2
46 22 E- 1 Pian
47 22 E- 2 Schematics ~ Details
48 22 E- 2 MCC #2 Power Feed Relocation
49 22 E- 2 MCC #2 Power Feed Relocation
Digester 3
50 25 E- 1 Plan
51 25 E- 2 Section & Details
52 25 E- 2 MCC Elevation
Digester 5
53 26 E- 1 Plan
54 26 E- 3 MCC Elevations
55 26 E- 2 Schematics & Details
56 26 E- 3 Schematics & Details
55 26 E- 4 Schematics & Details
Centrifuge and Wet Cake Storage
56 43 E- 1 Plan
57 43 E- 2 Schematics & Details
58 43 E- 3 Schematics & Details
Sludge Dryer RTO
59 47 E- 1 Site Plan
60 47 E- 2 Schematics ~ Details
61 47 E- 3 Schematics & Details
62 47 E- 4 Schematics & Details
Subtotal Electrical
P&ID (Biosolids Expansion)
67 43 N- 6 Boiler 1 & 2 Primary Loop
68 43 N- 10 Digester 5 Mixers 5-1 & 5-2
69 43 N- 11 Digester 5 Mixers 5-3 & 5-4
70 43 N- 13 Digester Transfer Pump 4-1 & 4-2
71 43 N- 14 Digester Transfer Pump 5-1 i;< 5-2
72 43 N- 15 Digester 4 & 5 Gas Schematic
73 43 N- 16 Digester 4 & 5 Gas Condensate 8 Iron Sponge
74 43 N- 17 Digester Gas Storage
75 43 N- 18 Digester Gas Booster
76 43 N- 19 Centrifuge Interface
77 43 N- 20 Wet Cake Storage Interface
78 47 N- 23 RTOlnterface
Subtotal P&IDs
1 Totals
WWTP CHAN GE ORDER - W Inlet Channel
79 D 1 Demolition Plan
80 C 2 Sfte Plan
81 S 3 Plan !£ Section
82 S 4 Section & Details
83 M 5 Plan & Section
84 M 6 Section & Details
85 E 7 Plan & Section
86 E 8 Section & Details
Subtotal UV Change Order
Rev_1 _T04_BiosolidsExpanion.xls
tC~ Q
C D ~,
C
C
~ ~ ~
w
~
~
C
+-
d x
C y N
C G
W
m C~
0
~
C
t-' w ~ ~Gp V ~ ~ ~ ..,' ~
~ E ~ w g ~ w ~ ~ w E,
~ te
~ y ~
~ a
`. ~ w -c
. A '.
'u A
1.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 24.0 0.5 53
5
1.0 2.0 2.0 _16.0 24.0 0.5 .
45,5
1.0 4.0 16.0 24.0 1.0 46.0
0.5 2.0 4.0 24.0 1.0 31.5
0.5 2.0 4.0 24.0 1.0 31.5
4.0 t2.0 28.0 40.0 0.0 120.0 4.0 208.0
2.0 0.5
2.0 0.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2-0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
2-0 0.5 2.5
2.0 0.5 2.5
42.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 52.5
0.5 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 0.5 25.0
0.5 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 0.5 12.0
0.5 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 0.5 12.0
0.5 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 0.5 ~,p
0.5 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 0.5 12,p
0.5 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 0.5 25
0
0.5 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 0.5 ,
~,p
0.5 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 0.5 25.0
0.5 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 0.5 ~r,p
0.5 6.0 4.0 20.0 2.0 0.5 33,0
0.5 6.0 4.0 20.0 5.0 0.5 36.0
0.5 6.0 4.0 20.0 6.0 0.5 37.0
6.0 60.0 42.0 0.0 123.0 55.0 6.0 29Y,0
41.5 424.0 192.0 181.0 735.0 93.5 0.0 1891.0
0.5 4.0 16.0 12.0 0.5 33.0
0.5 4.0 16.0 16.0 0.5 37
0
0.5 1.0 4.0 16.0 12.0 0.5 .
34.0
0.5 1.0 4.0 16.0 6.0 0.5 PB,p
0.5 4.0 16.0 2.0 0.5 23
0
0.5 4.0 16.0 6.0 0.5 .
27
0
0.5 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 0.5 ,
1 1.0
4.0 6.0 0.5 10.5
3.5 20.0 74.0 32.0 8.0 62.0 4.0 0.0 203.5
2 of 2 12/6/2005
• •
a
m
LL
E
'a
~ ~ 'Q
~ Z
^ C L
c Ea
N Q O
~ ~ N
~ ~
O F
._. ~
G
a
c
m
E
O
Q
E
m
Q
U
h
N
W
N
N
n
w
O
~,
_~
}
U
_n
r
m
`o
N ~
,E 5 m
m m
Q ~ o.
`o
0 0 ~ ~
'o~
~ N - p
g~o E ~ $
.E ~i o
w` m 2
O) ~ W y
C d ~ N
.~ R
.~a°g.
~a~°
Eao
N ~ (~
0
~ IL rpm
~ a.E O
~' ~a~
N y ~ m
C p . ~
U U ~ ~
N W
•
~~ c~ro~~o
BY DATE CLIENT SHEET OF
CHKD. BY DESCRIPTION .IOB NO.
O OD
U ~
o ~~_
F W[~m°
~ ~ ~ *,
~ W
~ 0
a~ ~~x
~ ~
W
•
~~ ~~Z
SIS0.7 ~. Hd
(uoddnS aousradp)
)e7bmaonn~ nmo~g
(~~ml])
~P~A pow
(ra77Q aBPnIS)
gatH2¢[8Qd IIOSS[n
(8vu(anmS)
saoDnloS P°e'I
8v®am8a3 ~
cvivxJS)
~~~o~
O cn ao V •. h o0
'~ o~ h N th R ^ ti
b ~
t~ y 'Q M ~O \O O~ .
.. N
b h M o b (n 00 O N N
^ N N h
b
N b .~-i p
N .
. b
69 b9 69 (f9 69 64 b9 69 64 EA 69
~~ b ~ M h 0 rn N ~
hbY O O~ R oo . -. +n
69
h
b
N
O
O
O
G9
n
v
a
ri
b
7
0
d
~~$ ti ~ M
v
P IeII3 0~0 0 'V ~
O "' M ,~
a
mom raad wv °~
O a1
p
~
'
d
STd~jCT(f~II~iS2Q 'n 'V N N G
C
~ ~ ~ M
N
d
~~o
3IIOAQlm[mWSaI
~ 1~~II
~ b ~ c
~ M ~
saam8ur7leapwonyg ~ O b
N `~~»
ao N
N
e
~~ V ~ n~ N O
~ b
~
O~fl ~g
EAII181~JOa[OTd ~ N ~ ~ ~ n N ~ `
5
N '.' b v
3
aaa,~z~~
T2$Ef1SW I~IO,Id o O
V' N ~ •M-' a0 b
o
D
N
N
.;
U
O ~ ~ A ~
,s`~ ~ A o ~' o
~„~ y
a~ ~=O~ o
~
c ~'
~ E °U' A ~ ~ o ~ ~
W
A c ~ :: ~
~ y '~ ~ ~
"' °° ~ ~
~ E"
O U
~
~
' ~'
F o F o
F 0. ~
~
~ a ~ '~ AA
~' :c ~o @ °-~ Qg c
U tij `w'
~"Q~~ q~ ~QgS
` ~~ gF a.
~ a m.. ~A ~ ~ o
~ ~ ~ .~
Q
`
A
a
,.3~a
AA U 00
^+ N cn .--~ V. ...
X
F E,
N
~ N
a ~~ ~
s
N
~~~
7 ~ ~?
in
7
~ N 7
`* S
~ n
en W
~U
0
x ~~
a ~
F
a
.`
Sheet Ii'ask Order No. 1 Biosolids Drawing
1 G- 1 Cover Sheet
2 G- 2 Drawing Index
3 G- 3 Design Criteria
4 G- 4 General Site Plan
5 G- 5 Abbreviations
6 G- 6 General Legend
7 G- 7 General Structural Notes
8 G- 8 General Mechanical Notes
9 G- 9 Electrical Legend
10 G- 10 instrumentation Legend
11 T- 1 Typical Details
12 T- 2 Typical Details
13 T- 3 Typical Details
14 T- 4 Typical Details
15 T- 5 Typical Details
16 T- 6 Typical Details
17 T- 7 Typipt Details
18 T- 8 Typical Detals
19 T- 9 Typical Details
DEMOL177ON
20 D- ## Demolition -Details
21 D- 4f# Demolition -Details
YARD
22 C- 1 Yard Piping Plan -Plant Site
23 G 2 Yard Piping Plan -Details
24 C- 3 Yana Piping Pian -Details
25 C- 4 Grading Plan -Plant Site
26 C- 5 Grading Plan -Plant Site
27 C- 6 Grading Plan -Details
Subtotal General /Typical /Civil
ANAEROBIC DIGESTER AND BUILDING
Architectural
28 A- 1 Roof Plan
29 A 2 Building Elevations
30 A- 3 Building Elevations
30 A- 4' Building Details
31 A- 5 Building Details
Structural Draw[ngs
32 S- 1 Foundation Pian -Digester
33 S= 2 Floor Pian -Digester
34 S- 3 Sections 8 Details -Digester
35 S- 4 Sections & Details -Digester
36 S- 5 Foundation Pian -Digester Building
37 S- 6 Floor Plan -Digester Building
38 S- 7 Roof Framing Plan -Digester Building
39 S- 8 Sections & Details -Digester Building
40 S- 9 Sections & Details -Digester Building
41 S- 10 Sections & Details -Digester Building
Mechanical Drawings
42 M- 1 Liquid Stream Schematic
43 M- 2 Gas Stream Schematic
44 M- 3 Existing Boiler System Modifications
45 M- 4 Existing Gas System Modifications
46 M- 5 Plan -Digester
47 M- 6 Sections -Digester
48 M- 7 Sections & Details -Digester
49 M- 8 Sections & Details -Digester
•
~.
d
.G F
o f
a` ~ o
~ .Y
60
(~
p m
a
N
N
'y~
W
~
'~
o
~
v~ ~p ~
~E ~
m
~~ W
~'`~ ~ w
~
/~
H
~
~
A
Y
.C
e
'w
0.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.5
1.0 1.0 1.0 8.0 0.5
1.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 0.5
0.5 1.0 4.0 4.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 2.0 0.5
0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5
0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5
0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5
0.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.5
0.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 2.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 2.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 . 0.5 20 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 2.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 2.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 2.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 2.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 2.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 2.0 0.5
1.0 4.0 B.0 8.0 8.0 1.0
1.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 B.0 1.0
1.0 2.0 8.0 16.0 1.0
1.0 2.0 8.0 16.0 1.0
1.0 2.0 8.0 8.0 16.0 1.0
0.5 1.0 4.0 8.0 i.0
0.5 1.0 4.0 8,0 1,p
0.5 1.0 4.0 8.0 1.0
12.5 32.0 72.0 27.5 4.0 135.0 17.5
0.5 1.0 1.0 4.0 12.0 0.5
0.5 1.0 1.0 4.0 12.0 0.5
0.5 1.0 1.0 4.0 12.0 0.5
0.5 1.0 1.0 4.0 12.0 0.5
0.5 1.0 1.0 4.0 12.0 0.5
1.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
1.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
1.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
1.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
1.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
t.0 2.0 20 24.0 24.0 2.0
1.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
1.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
1.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
1.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 24.0 20
4.0 16.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
4.0 16.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
4.0 16.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
4.0 16.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
4.0 16.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
4.0 16.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
4.0 16.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
4.0 16.0 24.0 24.0 2.0
F
5.0
11.5
15.5
10.0
4.0
4.0
5.0
4.0
6.0
6.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
30.0
30.0
28.0
28.0
36.0
14.5
14.5
14.5
300.5
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
P 1/z
•
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
so
81
82
83
64
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
M- 9 Plan -Digester Building 8.0 24.0 32.0 24.0 2
0 90
0
M- 10 Sections & Details -Digester Building 8.0 24.0 32.0 24
0 .
2
0 .
M- 11 Sections & Details -Digester Building
8
0
24
0
32
0 . . 9p,p
M- 12 Sections $ Details -Digester Building .
8
0 .
24
0 .
32
0 24.0 2.0 90.0
M- 13 Plumbing Plan .
1.0 .
8.0 .
16.0 24.0
24
D 2.0
1
0 90.0
M- 14 Plumbing Sections & Details
1.0
8.0
16.0 .
24
0 .
1
0 50.0
M- 15 HVAC Plan
1.0
8.0
16.0 .
24.0 .
1
0 50.0
50
0
M- 16 HVAC DetaOs 1.0 8.0 16.0 24.0 .
1.0 .
50.0
Subtotal Anaerobic Digesters and Building 80.5 281.0 409.0 260.0 0.0 684.0 50.5 1765.0
SLUDGE DRYER
Architectural
A- 1 Roof Plan
A- 2 Building Elevations 0.5 1.0 1.0 4.0 12.0 1.0 19.5
A- 3 Building Details 0.5
0.5 1.0
1.0 1.0
1
0 4.0
4
0 12.0
12
0 0.5
0 19.0
. . . .5 19.0
Structural Drawings
S- 1 Foundation Plan
S- 2 Floor Plan 1.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 24.0 2.0 55.0
~
S- 3 Sections & Details 1.0
1
0 2.0
2
0 2.0
2
0 24.0
24
0 24.0 2.0 55.0
S- 4 Sections & Detals .
1.0 .
2.0 .
2.0 .
24.0 24.0
24.0 2.0
2
0 55.0
55
0
S- 5 Sections i£ Details 1.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 24.0 .
2
0 .
55
0
S- 6 Sections ~ Details 1.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 24.0 .
2.0 .
55.0
Mechanical Drawings
M- 1 Plan
M- 2 Top Plan 8.0 24.0 32.0 24.0 20 90.0
M- 3 Sections & Details 8.0
8
0 24.0
24
0 32.0
32
0 24.0 2.0 g0,p
M- 4 Sections & Details .
8.0 .
24.0 .
32.0 24.0
24.0 2.0
2 p gp,p
~ 0
M- 5 Sections & Details 8.0 24.0 32.0 24.0 20 90
0
M- 6 Sections & Details 8.0 24.0 32.0 24.0 2
0 .
90
0
M- 7 HVAC
M- 8 HVAC 2.0 8.0 24.0 24.0 .
2.0 .
60,0
2.0 8.0 24.0 24.0 2.0 60.0
Subtotal Sludge Dryer 59.5 175.0 255.0 156.0 0.0 372.0 30.0 1047.5
P&ID
N- 1 DIGESTER BOILER SYSTEM 1 (E)
N- 2 DIGESTER BOILER SYSTEM 2 (E) 20.0 5.0 25.0
N- 3 DIGESTER BOILER SYSTEM 3 20.0 5.0 25.0
N- 4 ANEROBIC DIGESTER 1 -MIXING 20.0 5.0 25.0
N- 5 ANEROBIC DIGESTER 1 -HEATING 20.0 6.0 26,p
N- 6 ANEROBIC DIGESTER 2 -MIXING 20.0 6.0 26,p
N- 7 ANEROBtC DIGESTER 2 -HEATING 20.0 6.0 26,p
N- 8 ANEROBIC DIGESTER 3 -MIXING 20.0 6.0 26,p
N- 9 ANEROBIC DIGESTER 3 -HEATING 20.0 6.0 26,p
N- 10 ANEROBIC DIGESTER 4 -MIXING 20.0 6.0
N- 11 ANEROBIC DIGESTER 4 -HEATING 20.0 6.0 ~,p
N- 12 DIGESTED SLUDGE PUMPS 1 AND 2 {E) 20.0 6.0 26,p
N- 13 DIGESTED SLUDGE PUMPS 3 20.0 6.0 ~.p
N- 14 MESO SLUDGE PUMP AND MIXER 2D.0 6.0 26.0
N- 15 HW RECIRC PUMP 20.0 6 0
N- 16 SLUDGE DEWATERING PUMP 1 AND 2 (E) 20.0 6.0 26,p
N- 17 SLUDGE DEWATERING PUMP 3 2D.0 6.0 26,p
N- 18 SLUDGE DRYER 20.0 6.0 ~,p
N- 19 SLUDGE DRYER 20.0 6.0 26,p
20.0 6.0 26.0
Subtotal P&IDs
380.0 111.0 491.0
Totals 305.0 976.0 1472.0 887.0 388.0 2493.0 196.0 6717.0
~ fL E Vi scr> SGo~ F~,rz. IJ/Grt'.ST~eS / 5~ •2
/8z- f~cx~~2s .A/~PLl~/J l -~-~ Ts~s~c. O~e.~~~ '~
P` Zlz
d
o~
N N
~~
~ ~az°
a ~ z
0
~io~o
o ~~~~
~~
~ ~
n
(~ ~ F
`~ \
of
~} ~
of ~ ~g
~~
~n
~ ~'
~~~
~~
J ~
~ N
~ .r
W
x ~ J
a ~
E w~
~~
,.
., ..
~o
Sheet Task Order 2 Amendment Drawing Description ~ F w
iu E " - w
0.F ~ ~
ANAEROBIC DIGESTER SLUDGE TRANSFER
Structural Drawings
1 43 S- 11 Foundation Plan -Digester No. 1 & 2 Building
2 43 S- 12 Sections & Details -Digester Building
3 43 S- 13 Sections & Details -Digester Building
Mechanical Drawings
4 43 M- 1 Upper Plan
~ 5 43 M- 2 Ftoor Plan
6 43 M- 3 Sections & Details -Digester
7 43 M- 4 Sections & Details - HWS Piping
Subtotal Anaerobic Digesters No 1 ~ 2 Buildin
c •o o w ~
W
° d
v ~ ~ (l
C V
.C vi
~
i- 5 E ~ m U o
w~ A w
1.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 24.0 2.0 ~
0
1.0 2.0 2.0 16.0 8.0 2.0 ,
31
0
1.0 2.0 2.0 16.0 8.0 2.0 .
31.0
1.0 8.0 4.0 12.0 2.0 27.0
1.0 12.0 4.0 24.0 2.0 43
0
1.0 8.0 4.0 24.0 2.0 .
39
0
1.0 8.0 4.0 16.0 2.0 .
31
0
7.0 42.0 22.0 56.0 0.0 116.0 14.0 .
257,0
SLUDGE DRYER
Structural Drawings
8 47 S- 1 Silo Foundation Plan 1.0 2
0 2
0 24
0
9 47 S- 2 Sections & Details
1
0 . . . 24.0 2.0 55.0
10
47 S-
3 Sections & Details .
1
0 2.0 2.0 16.0 24.0 2.0 47.0
11
47 S-
4 Sections & Details . 2.0 2.0 16.0 24.0 2.0 47.0
Mechanical Drawings 1.0 2.0 2.0 16.0
24.0
2.0
47.0
12
13 47 M-
47 M- 1 Silo Plan
2 Sections & Details 8.0 16.0 32.0
24.0
2.0
g2,0
14
47 M-
3 Sections & Details 8.0 16.0 24.0 24.0 2.0 74.0
15
47 M-
4 HVAC 8.0 16.0 24.0
24.0
2.0
74.0
Subtotal Sludge Dryer 2.0 8.0 24.0 24.0 2.0 60.0
30.0 64.0 112.0 72.0 0.0 192.0 16.0 486.0
ELECTRICAL
ANAEROBIC DIGESTER SLUDGE TRANSFER PUMPS ~~+t
cf~. C.
r~ rL7G E~~-~
i.,
i6 43 E- 1 Plan -Digester No
1 & 2 Buildin ,. ,
, .,
17
43 E- .
g
2 Schematics l;< Details
24.0
24.0
0.5
qg,5
18 43 E- 3 Schematics & Details 12.0 24.0 0.5 36.5
SLUDGE DRYER 12.0 24.0 0.5 36.5
19 47 {~ i Silo Pfan
20 47 ~ 2 Schematics & Details 32.0 24.0 0.5 56.5
21 47 ~ 3 Schematics & Details 16.0 24.0 0.5 40.5
22 47 (~ 4 Schematics & Details 16.0 24.0 0.5 40,5
Subtotal Electrical
0
0 16.0 24.0 0.5 40.5
. 0.0 0.0 0.0 128.0 168.0 3.5 2gg,5
,~ P&ID
23 43 N- 1 DIGESTER TRANSFER PUMPS 1
24 43 N- 2 DIGESTER TRANSFER PUMPS 2 8.0 5.0 13.0
47 N- 3 SLUDGE DRYER -PELLET COOLER 4.0 2.0 g,
26 47 N- 4 PELLET STORAGE SILO 20.0 6.0 26.0
27 47 N- 5 PELLET STORAGE SILO 20.0 6.0 26.0
Subtotal P&IDs
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 8.0
60
0 6.0
25
0
0
0 14,p
. . . 85.0
Totals 37.0 106.0 134.0 128.0 188.0 501.0 33.5 1127,5
.27Co ~ov,2s ,~bt~PC~~/~
z-o. y
Rev_T02_Solids.xls 1 of 1 12/6/2005
January 13, 2006
•
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2006
APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-G
REQUEST Approve New Beer License and Liquor License Transfer for Gary Bates
at the Whitewater Saloon - 1646 North Meridian Road
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contac#ed:
Emailed:
See attached
Date: Phone:
Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
January 13, 2006
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2006
APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-H
REQUEST Approve Beer and Liquor License Transfer from Whitewater Saloon to Allen
Rossi at Carrabba's Italian Grill - 3285 East Pine Avenue
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
See attached
Date: Phone:
Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
• .
January 13, 2006
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2006
APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-~
REQUEST Approve New Beer & Wine Licenses for Cody Do a# Fusion Asian Grill at
3161 East Fairiview Avenue
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
COMMENTS
See attached
Contacted: Date: Phone:
Emailed: Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the Ctiy of Meridian.
January 13, 2006
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2006
APPLICANT f[EM NO. Jr-J
REQUEST Agreement with ACHD for Roadway Construction /Sewer and Water Line
Improvements for ACHD Project X3021 Locust Grove Franklin Road to Fairview
Avenue
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER: See attached
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT: '/'""
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
fDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted: Date: Phone:
Emailed: Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public rneeHngs shad become property of the Cfly of Merman,
.w
City ®f ~lericlias~.
City Ciea°l~ ®~ce
Ta. Nl~dl Berg; Tama Green
From Kyle Radek, P.E., StafF Engineer
C~: File
Rte: 1/15
fRe: Proposed Agenda Item for January 17, 2r~.5 Gity Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respec#ully r~uests the following item be pNac~f on the
January 17 City Councna7 agenda, under Consent Agenda, for Gounal's consideration:
The agreement addresses the division of responsr~ilit~v for design, bid solicitation, conb~ct
admirrstratiaon, consbvc~on inspection, and payment for water and sewer improvements
assoaated with this project.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends
that C€ty Council approve the Agreement for Roadway Construction /Sewer ~
Water Line Improvements for ACRD Proje~# ;383021, Locust Grove, Franklin
Road to Fairview Avenue and aul~ori~te tfte Mayor to sign it.
Thank you for your considers. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
any of these items.
~~CEIVF;T~
• Page 1
3S
`I
~' . I
CITY OF ~6cn` ~..I
~°~,
~Yl1~12 ~ ~,
IDAHO
i~
r~. p~/~
~~M~F ~'
k ~~ TRE.iSURE V~ ~i~Y
SINCE
1993
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
January 31, 2006
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird
Joseph W. Borton Susan Slaughter
Charles M. Rountree
Shaun Wardle Director's Office
Ada County Highway District
3775 Adams Street
CITY DEPARTMENTS Garden City, Idaho 83714
City Attorney/HR
703 Main Street
898-5506 (City Attorney) ~~ ACHD Project No. 503021 -Agreement for Roadway
898-5503 (HR) Construction -Locust Grove, Franklin Road to Fairview Avenue
Fax 884-8723
Fire I Dear Susan,
540 E. Franklin Road
888-1234 /fax 895-0390 Enclosed please end the above agreement as recently approved by the
Parks & Recreation Meridian City Council. Please have both originals signed and attested
11 W. Bower Street
88 ,
and return one completed original to our office at your earliest
8-3579 /fax 898-5501
convenience.
Planning
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 202 Please feel free contact our office if ou have an concerns.
S' S'
884-5533 /fax 888-6844
Police
1401 E. Watertower Lane
Sincerely,
888-6678/fax 846-7366
Public Works
~~
660 E. Watertower Lane
suite 20o Sharon Smith
898-5500 /fax 895-9551 Deputy City Clerk
- Building City of Meridian
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 150
887-2211 /fax 887-1297
- Wastewater
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
888-2191 /fax 884-0744 cc: Kyle Radek, P.E., Meridian City Staff Engineer
- Water file
2235 N.W. 8th Street
888-5242 /fax 884-1159
CITY FALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLERK - FAX 888-4218 FINANCE 8r UTILITY BILLING - FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE -FAX 884-8119
Printed on recycled paper
AGR~Ei~~NrFOR:
RC~DppAY~~ ppC~aGNSTR®®l®®1C~{~I®N~,/®/~S p~®E~R ~ ATER~eLI~Ng~E IPR,Gt~/AEENTS
Eke 4~~T'6~R~Y~' i I~i~l~Ily B'~^®~D ~~r~~a9~9Rtl~ ~1~8EY~7~~
i`i'OJI~D PR,9a8E~ 1 N®. ~®a7®C~
WlTNESSIETIi
WHEREAS, the DISTRICT and MERIDIAN desire to undertake a joint effort t®
share the tasks and costs of reconstructing from Locust Grove Road, Franklin to
Fairview, including wet®r and sanitary sewer installations as detailed in Project Number
50302 hereina~er ref®rred to as the CONTRACT.
WHEREAS, the DISTRICT is willing to accommodate MERIDIAN'S request by
arranging for installs#ion of the water line and the sanitary sewer pipeline as part of the
Project plans so long as the DISTRICT receives assurances that the DISTRICT will be
fully reimbursed far all costs and expenses it incurs a5 a result of additional work
attributed to the ins#allation of the water lines and the sanitary sew®r pi~lines within the
Project boundaries, including but not limited to, costs for changed editions, plan
errors and omissions, and delays attributable to the water line or the sanitary sewer
pipeline design and installation.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, mutual
covenants and agreement herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. ®13TRICT SIHAt.L:
a. 03e the party responsible for soliciting, riving, and opening of bids and #or
executing and administering the construction GONTRACT for the roadway
reconstruction, and sanitary sewer and water line installation work referenced
herein;
b. Provide MERIDIAN with a complete set of combined bid doc~.rments for the
roadway reconstruction, and for the sanitary sewer and water line installation
work r®fer®nced herein;
c. Furnish MERIDIAN with an abstract of all bids received, and obtain
MERIDIAN'S concurrence with DISTRICT'S recomm®ndation for award of the
CONTRACT prior to making such award;
~~~~
d. Fake monthly progress payments and the final CONTRACT payment to the
Contractor in conf®rmance with the t s of the construction C®N CT;
e. Submit to MERIDIAN a copy of each Contractor progress payment estimate, as
such estimates are approved by DISTRICT, together with an invoice for
MERIDIAN'S sharp of the construction CONTRACT costs earned by and to be
paid to Contractor;
f. Provide for the r®f®rence and replacement of all pre-existing survey monuments
within the work ar®a;
g. Provide the trench compaction testing for the sanitary sewer and water line
facilities from 1 foot above the pipe zone to sub-grade of th® roadway section;
tr®nch compaction testing shall be provided at the minimum frequency rate of
one (1) test per five hundred (500) lineal feet per foot of trench depth; provide
all re testing required in any area that does not meet CONTRACT
requirements; and
h. Provide the field survey end grade control necessary for construction of the
roadway. Centerline or offsets and stationing shall be established prior to
fiAERIDIAN staking sanitary sewer, water lines, manhole locations, and service
lines.
2. ~AERI®IAN SfiAILL:
a. Se the party responsible to provide the inspection, field survey and grade
control required for the installaticm of all sanitary sewer and water facilities
installed under the CONTRACT and provide copies of appropriate tests and
diaries to the ®istrict Project Representative;
b. Provide DISTRICT with the construction plans, special provisions, and unit bid
quantities for the sanitary sewer and water facilities to be included in the bid
documents for the CONTRACT (elf work required for the sanitary sewer and
water facilities to be performed in conformances with the 2000 Edition of the
Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC) and the City of
Meridian Standard Specifications and Drawings);
c. Remit to DISTRICT, within thirty-frve (35) calendar days after the date of invoice
therefore, all funds for which MERIDIAN is responsible pursuant to the
approved final CONTRACT paymen# estimate;
d. Remit #o DISTRICT within thirty-five (35) calendar days after the date of invoice
therefore, all funds for which MERIDIAN is responsible pursuant to this
Agreement; '
Pam 2 t~f 4
Se liable for th® cost of repairing any trench failures attributable to failure of
sanitary sewer and water lines within the boundaries identified in the Contract,
and be liable for and indemnify the District for any and ail costs and damages
resulting from any such tr®nch failure; and
g, Reimburse District for any additional costs to District attributable to the
installation of sanitary sewer and water lines or to the removal of any or all
items from the Contract that are associated with the installation of sanitary
sewer and water pipelines.
3a TIDE PARTIES HEREI°® FURTHER AGREE TH~-T':
a. The C®NTRACT amount for the sanitary sewer and water portion of the project
to be reimbursed to DISTRICT by ~~RIDIAN shall be based on the actual
quantities of work acceptably performed, and/or, installed, as determined from
field measurements, and paid for pursuant to the unit, and/or lump sum prices
established in the Contract;
b. NIERiDIAN'S approval will be required for any change order work involving the
sanitary sewer or water line installations;
c. Prior to commencement of work by the Contractor, the parties will, together with
the Contractor, inspect the entire project for the purpose of reviewing the project
to locate and note any unstable areas and resolve any items of concern or
misunderstanding;
d. This instrument contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect
to the subject matter hereof,
e. This Agreement may not be enlarged, modified, amended or altered excerpt in
writing signed by both of the parties hereto;
f. All signatories to this Agreement represent and warrant tha# they have the
power to execute this Agreement and to bind the agency they represent to the
terms of this Agr®em®nt;
Page 3 ~# 4
g. Should either party to this Agreement
against the other to enforce the terms
prevailing party shall be entitled to
incurred in said action;
be required to commence legal action
and conditions of this Agreemen#, the
reasonable attorneys fees and costs
h. Any action at law, suit in equity, arbitration or judicial proceeding for the
enforcement of this Agreement shall be instituted only in the courts of the State
of Idaho, County of Ada; and
This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the personal
representatives, heirs and assigns of the respective parties hereto.
IN WITNESS HERE®F, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on
the day and year herein first written.
ATTEST: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
By: By:
Susan Slaughter William J. Schweitzer
Senior Administrative Assistant Director
ATTEST: ~,a~`"""' "~>T,1( OF MERIDIAN
t r
,{ `a< `~
m
B~ sa,
~;,
William G. Berg, Jr. .~
~ Ta
City Clerk °°~ ayor y~~~lyr'
del&9/i/1 IIY691~ ~)
Page 4 of 4
~ ~
AGREEMENT FOR:
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION /SEWER & WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS
LOCUST GR®VE, FRANKLIN ROAD T® FAIRVIEW AVENUE
ACRD PROJECT NO. 503021
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of , 2006, by
and between the ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, by and through its Board of
Commissioners hereinafter called DISTRICT, as first party, and the CITY OF
MERIDIAN, a municipal corporation, by and through its Mayor and City Council
hereinafter called MERIDIAN as second party, both parties being a body politic and
corporate of the State of Idaho.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the DISTRICT and MERIDIAN desire to undertake a joint effort to
share the tasks and costs of reconstructing from Locust Grove Road, Franklin to
Fairview, including water and sanitary sewer installations as detailed in Project Number
503021 hereinafter referred to as the CONTRACT.
WHEREAS, the DISTRICT is willing to accommodate MERIDIAN'S request by
arranging for installation of the water line and the sanitary sewer pipeline as part of the
Project plans so long as the DISTRICT receives assurances that the DISTRICT will be
fully reimbursed for all costs and expenses it incurs as a result of additional work
attributed to the installation of the water lines and the sanitary sewer pipelines within the
Project boundaries, including but not limited to, costs for changed conditions, plan
errors and omissions, and delays attributable to the water line or the sanitary sewer
pipeline design and installation.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, mutual
covenants and agreement herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. DISTRICT SHALL:
a. Be the party responsible for soliciting, receiving, and opening of bids and for
executing and administering the construction CONTRACT for the roadway
reconstruction, and sanitary sewer and water line installation work referenced
herein;
b. Provide MERIDIAN with a complete set of combined bid documents for the
roadway reconstruction, and for the sanitary sewer and water line installation
work referenced herein;
c. Furnish MERIDIAN with an abstract of all bids received, and obtain
MERIDIAN'S concurrence with DISTRICT'S recommendation for award of the
CONTRACT prior to making such award;
Page 1 of 4
d. Make monthly progress payments and the final CONTRACT payment to the
Contractor in conformance with the terms of the construction CONTRACT;
e. Submit to MERIDIAN a copy of each Contractor progress payment estimate, as
such estimates are approved by DISTRICT, together with an invoice for
MERIDIAN'S share of the construction CONTRACT costs earned by and to be
paid to Contractor;
f. Provide for the reference and replacement of all pre-existing survey monuments
within the work area;
g. Provide the trench compaction testing for the sanitary sewer and water line
facilities from 1-foot above the pipe zone to sub-grade of the roadway section;
trench compaction testing shall be provided at the minimum frequency rate of
one (1) test per five hundred (500) lineal feet per foot of trench depth; provide
all re-testing required in any area that does not meet CONTRACT
requirements;.and
h. Provide the field survey and grade control necessary for construction of the
roadway. Centerline or offsets and stationing shall be established prior to
MERIDIAN staking sanitary sewer, water lines, manhole locations, and service
lines.
2. MERIDIAN SHALL:
a. Be the party responsible to provide the inspection, field survey and grade
control required for the installation of all sanitary sewer and water facilities
installed under the CONTRACT and provide copies of appropriate tests and
diaries to the District Project Representative;
b. Provide DISTRICT with the construction plans, special provisions, and unit bid
quantities for the sanitary sewer and water facilities to be included in the bid
documents for the CONTRACT (all work required for the sanitary sewer and
water facilities to be performed in conformance with the 2000 Edition of the
Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC) and the City of
Meridian Standard Specifications and Drawings);
c. Remit to DISTRICT, within thirty-five (35) calendar days after the date of invoice
therefore, all funds for which MERIDIAN is responsible pursuant to the
approved final CONTRACT payment estimate;
d. Remit to DISTRICT within thirty-five (35) calendar days after the date of invoice
therefore, all funds for which MERIDIAN is responsible pursuant to this
Agreement;
Page 2 of 4
e. Reimburse the DISTRICT, up to a maximum of $8,000.00 for all costs incurred
by the DISTRICT, including overhead and benefits, project administration,
compaction testing, and soils work required solely for the construction of the
sanitary sewer and water facilities; mobilization, traffic control, flagging, detours,
and weekly meetings shall be reimbursed on a prorated basis. The prorated
basis for the above items will be calculated using the percentage of the
MERIDIAN `S project costs as they relate to the total project construction costs;
f. Be liable for the cost of repairing any trench failures attributable to failure of
sanitary sewer and water lines within the boundaries identified in the Contract,
and be liable for and indemnify the District for any and all costs and damages
resulting from any such trench failure; and
g. Reimburse District for any additional costs to District attributable to the
installation of sanitary sewer and water lines or to the removal of any or all
items from the Contract that are associated with the installation of sanitary
sewer and water pipelines.
3. THE PARTIES HERETO FURTHER AGREE THAT:
a. The CONTRACT amount for the sanitary sewer and water portion of the project
to be reimbursed to DISTRICT by MERIDIAN shall be based on the actual
quantities of work acceptably performed, and/or, installed, as determined from
field measurements, and paid for pursuant to the unit, and/or lump sum prices
established in the Contract;
b. MERIDIAN'S approval will be required for any change order work involving the
sanitary sewer or water line installations;
c. Prior to commencement of work by the Contractor, the parties will, together with
the Contractor, inspect the entire project for the purpose of reviewing the project
to locate and note any unstable areas and resolve any items of concern or
misunderstanding;
d. This instrument contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect
to the subject matter hereof;
e. This Agreement may not be enlarged, modified, amended or altered except in
writing signed by both of the parties hereto;
f. All signatories to this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the
power to execute this Agreement and to bind the agency they represent to the
terms of this Agreement;
Page 3 of 4
g. Should either party to this Agreement be required to commence legal action
against the other to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the
prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs
incurred in said action;
h. Any action at law, suit in equity, arbitration or judicial proceeding for the
enforcement of this Agreement shall be instituted only in the courts of the State
of Idaho, County of Ada; and
This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the personal
representatives, heirs and assigns of the respective parties hereto.
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on
the day and year herein first written.
ATTEST: ~ ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
By: By.
Susan Slaughter William J. Schweitzer
Senior Administrative Assistant Director
ATTEST: CITY OF MERIDIAN
,~,~,~Ill/tlnu~r i~~~es
ao°® ~
®® ®Pi
~
~
William G. Berg, Jr. m - ~-° Ta my~l eerd
City Clerk e '~ 11~ayor
o "~ 1~ . ~o
sf~
P ~~° B~Bf ttlQlll
L~~ Gt.~.~ ~~~i~~Ze~ ~t-1~-~
Page 4 of 4
•
January 13, X006
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2~6
APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-K
REQUEST Agreement for Services with DC Engineering, P.C. for the Meridian Woter
Department PRV SCADA Installation and Programming
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER: Sae attached
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY SIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date: Phone:
Staff Initials:
Matertais presented aF public me~srtin~s shall become properly of fhe City of Meridian.
•
~~~
To: Will Berg; Tara Green
From: Kyle Radek, P.E., Staff Engineer
CC: File
Date: 1 /19/05
Re: Execution of Contract with DC Engineering
®~~
~2~cErv~~y
'~-~ c~F ~~.~~®r~rJ
~~~~ CLERK ~~~fCF
The attached contract with DC Engineering for installation and programming of remote
terminal units at 8 pressure reducing valves was approved for signature at the January 17
City Council Meeting.
I have attached the original document and a copy that has the correct signature block copied
on to it. The intent is to have the mayor sign the copy, unless the signature block on the
original is acceptable or can be modfied.
Please have the document signed and return to me or call me at 898-5500 if the document /
signature block is not acceptable.
• Page 1
r,~„
' ~.~,'
ElV G/NE~~ ®0®/ G
January 3, 2006
Mr. Len Grady
City of Meridian Public Works
660 E Water tower
Suite 200
Meridian, ID 83642
Subject: Meridian Water Dept. PRV SCADA
Mr. Grady,
440 E. Corporate Drive
Suite 103
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: 208.288.2181
Fax 208.288.2182
Thank you very much for the opportunity to propose on the PRV SCADA installation and
programming for the City of Meridian Water Dept: The following is our proposed Scope of Service
based on the information that you have provided to us and the site visits with Custom IIectric.
Project Understanding
We understand that this project will include the installation and Wonderware programming of the
RTUs at 8 PRV locations. The PRV at 4 locations have an existing non-operational RTIJ and the other
4 will require a new RTU and programming.
Electrical Engineering
• Determine the IIectrcal Service requirements.
• Coordinate the power facilitation with IPCO for all 8 RTU locations.
• Develop installation drawings for required locations including specification of electrical
equipment.
• Coordinate with Custom IIectric for the installation of a new RTU at 4 locations.
• Complete the programming at all locations. ,~;
Deliverables
• 90% review documents
• Construction documents incorporating review comments.
Schedule
• DC Engineering has a capable staff that can start immediately. It is anticipated to take
approximately 2 weeks to develop 90% review documents once authorization to proceed has
been given.
Excluded
• All cost associated with and installation of electrical equipment.
0
DC Engineering
Fee
n
The project will be performed on time and material basis not to exceed $4,950 (Four Thousand Nine
Hundred Fifty Dollars).
Services will be billed per our standard rate of compensation as follows:
• Principal Engineer, PE: $95 per hour
• Project Manager. $90 per hour
• Engineer: $SO per hour
• Designer: $70 per hour
• Drafting: $50 per hour
• Clerical: $35 per hour
• Reimbursable expenses will be billed at cost p1us10 percent (For example: reproduction
drawings, shipping expenses, etcetera.)
Thank you again for the opportunity to work with you. If you have any questions, or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to ask.
Sincerely, r.. Accepted by:
,, ~;
DC ENGIrTEERIl~TG, P.C. :`~~
/1 ~~ ~
~,~~
Clay Bingham
Project Manager _
By:
Name: Tammy e Weerd Mayor
Approved by City Council: ~~ j '° ~ ~ - ®(p
(date)
[CORPORATE SEAL]
William G. Berg, Jr., City
2 DC Engineering
ENG/NEE"RlNG
January 3, 2006
Mr. Len Grady
City of Meridian Public Works
660 E Water tower
Suite 200
Meridian, ID 83642
Subject: Meridian Water Dept. PRV SCADA
Mr. Grady,
440 E. Corporate Drive
Suite 103
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: 208.288.2181
Fax 208.288.2182
Thank you very much for the opportunity to propose on the PRV SCADA installation and
programming for the City of Meridian Water .Dept The following is our proposed Scope of Service
based on the infon~nation that you have provided to us and the site visits with Custom Electric.
Project Understanding
We understand that this project will include the installation and Wonderware programming of the
RTUs at 8 PRV locations. The PRV at 4locations have an existing non-operational RTU and the other
4 will require a new RTU and programming.
Electrical Engineering
• Determine the Electrical Service requirements.
• Coordinate the power facilitation with IPCO for all 8 RTU locations.
• Develop installation drawings for required locations including specification of electrical
equipment.
• Coordinate with Custom Electric for the installation of a new RTU at 4locations.
• Complete the programming at all locations.
Deliverables
• 90% review documents
Construction documents incorporating review comments.
Schedule
• DC Engineering has a capable staff that can start immediately. It is anticipated to take
approximately 2 weeks to develop 90% review documents once authorization to proceed has
been given.
Excluded
• All cost associated with and installation of electrical equipment.
DC Engineering
F'ee
~ ~
The project will be performed on time and material basis not to exceed $4,950 (Four Thousand Nine
Hundred Fifty Dollars).
Services will be billed per our standard rate of compensation as follows:
• Principal Engineer, PE: $95 per hour
• Project Manager: $90 per hour
• Engineer: $80 per hour
• Designer: $70 per hour
• Drafting: $50 per hour
• Clerical: $35 per hour
• Reimbursable expenses will be billed at cost plus 10 percent. (For example: reproduction
drawings, shipping expenses, etcetera.)
Thank you again for the opportunity to work with you. If you have any questions, or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to ask.
Sincerely,
DC ENGIlVEIItING, P.C.
j,
{
Clay Bingham
Project Manager
Accepted by:
Printed Name
Title
Date
2 DC Engineering
Memo
To: Will Berg; Tara Green
From: Kyle Radek, P.E., Staff Engineer
CC: File
Date: 1 /12/05
Re: Proposed Agenda Item for January 17, 2005 City Council Meeting
The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following item be placed on the
January 17 City Council agenda, under Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration:
Contract with DC Engineering for installation and programming of Remote Terminal Units
(RTUs) at 8 Pressure Reducing Valves PRVs~ for the City of Meridian Water Department
Work under this contract will include the installation and programming of the Remote
Terminal Units (RTUs) at 8 PRV locations. The PRVs at 4 locations have an existing non-
operational RTU, and the other 4 will require a new RTU and programming. Costs
associated with installation of electrical equipment are not included. This contract work will
be performed on time and material basis not to exceed $4,950.
Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Depantment recommends
that Ciiy Council approve the contract with DC Engineering for Programming
of the Remote Terminal Units at 8 Pressure Reducing Valve locations at a cost
not to exceed $4,950.
r
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding
any of these items.
• Page 1
~c
EN G/NEE/? /N G
January 3, 2006
Mr. Len Grady
City of Meridian Public Works
660 E Water tower
Suite 200
Meridian, ID 83642
Subject: Meridian Water Dept. PRV SCADA
Mr. Grady,
~~c~IVE
JAN 1 22006
Ol~ll OF tU1ERIDIARI
~;Il~~' CLERK OFFI~'F
440 E. Corporate Drive
Suite 103
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: 208.288.2181
Fa~c 208.288.2182
Thank you very much for the opportunity to propose on the PRV SCADA installation and
programming for the City of Meridian Water Dept. The following is our proposed Scope of Service
based on the information that you have provided to us and the site visits with Custom IIectric.
Project Understanding
We understand that this project will include the installation and Wonderware programming of the
RTUs at 8 PRV locations. The PRV at 4 locations have an existing non-offrational RTU and the other
4 will require a new RTU and programming.
Electrical Engineering
• Determine the IIectrcal Service requirements.
• Coordinate the power facilitation with IPCO for all 8 RTU locations.
• Develop installation drawings for required locations including specification of electrical
equipment.
• Coordinate with Custom IIectric for the installation of a new RTU at 4 locations.
• Complete the programming at all locations. ~~;
Deliverables
• 90% review documents
• Construction documents incorporating review comments.
Schedule
• DC Engineering has a capable staff that can start immerii~ly. It is anticipated to take
approximately 2 weeks to develop 90% review documents once authorization to proceed has
been given.
Excluded
• All cost associated with and installation of electrical equipment.
DC Engineering
~ r
Fee
The project will be performed on time and material basis not to exceed $4,950 (Four Thousand Nme
Hundred Fifty Dollars).
Services will be billed per our standard rate of compensation as follows:
• Principal Engineer, PE: $95 per hour
• Project Manager. $90 per hour
• Engineer. $80 per hour
• Designer: $70 per hour
• Drafting: $50 per hour
• Clerical: $35 per hour
• Reimbursable expenses will be billed at cost p1us10 percent (Far example: reproduction
drawings, shipping expenses, etcetera.)
Thank you again far the opportunity to wank with you. If you have any questions, or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to ask.
Sincerely, Accepted by:
DC ENGIlVEII2ING, P.C.
~~ y
Clay Bingham
Project Manager
By:
Name: Tammy de Weerd, Mayor
Approved by City Council:
(date)
.~~:
[CORPORATE SEAL]
Attest:
William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk
2 DC Engineering
•
January 13, 2006
AZ 05-017
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2006
APPLICANT Tuscany Development, Inc. ITEM NO. 5-L
REQUEST Development Agreement -Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96
acres from RUT to R-8 zones for Messina Meadows Subdivision -South Eagle Road
between East Victory Road and East Amity Road
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
COMMENTS
See atCSached Development Agreement
Contacted: Date: Phone:
Emailed: Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly +ot the Ctty of Meridian.
•
•
F P 05-078
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2006
APPLICANT Briggs Engineering, InC. ITEM NO. $
REQUEST Final Plat approval of l bsingle-family residential building lots and 1 other
common area lot on 4.99 acres in a R-8 zone for Pisa Place Subdivision -3893 South
Locust Grove Road
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See Staff Comments
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: See aitached Comments
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date: Phone:
Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Merldtan.
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
C/C January 17, 2006
IN THE MATTER OF THE
APPLICATION OF BRIGGS
ENGINEERING, INC., FOR FINAL
PLAT APPROVAL OF 16 SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
LOTS AND 1 COMMON AREA LOT
ON 4.99 ACRES IN AN R-8 ZONE
LOCATED AT 3893 SOUTH
LOCUST GROVE ROAD IN A
PORTION OF THE SE 1/ OF THE
NE I/ OF T. 3N. R. lE., SECTION 30
CASE NO. FP-05-078
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to
Unified Development Code 11-6B-3 on January 17, 2006, and the Council finding that the
Administrative Review is complete from Sonya Wafters, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and
Zoning Department, and Michael Cole, Development Services Coordinator for the Public Works
Department, dated: Hearing Date: January 17, 2006, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council
having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Final Plat of "PLAT SHOWING PISA PLACE SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN
A PORTION OF THE SE 1/ OF THE NE '/ OF T. 3N., R. lE., SECTION 30,
BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2006,
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR PISA PLACE SUBDIVISION / (FP-OS-078)
Page 1 of 4
~ ~
HANDWRITTEN DATE: 11/11/O5, SHEET 1 OF 3, BRIGGS ENGINEERING,
INC.", HOWARD JENKINS, Developer, is ConditionallyApproved subject to those
conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City
Council from Sonya Wafters, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and Zoning
Department and Michael Cole, Development Services Coordinator for the Public
Works Department, dated: Hearing Date: January 17, 2006, listing 23 SITE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS/FINALPLAI and 13 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS,
a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and
consisting of 4 pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response
letter from Briggs Engineering, Inc., a true and correct copy of which is attached
hereto marked Exhibit "B" and consisting of 1 page, and by this reference
incorporated herein, and the additional requirements from the action of the Council
taken at their January 17, 2006 meeting as follows, to-wit:
1.1 Adopt the Recommendation of the Central District Health
Department as follows:
The Central District Health requires after written approval
from the appropriate entities are submitted, they can approve
this proposal for central sewage and central water; that plans
must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department
of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality for
central sewage and central water; that run-off is not to create a
mosquito breeding problem; and it is suggested that the
stormwater be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to
discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater
and surface water quality; that engineers and architects should
obtain current best management practices for stormwater
disposal and design a stormwater management system that is
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR PISA PLACE SUBDIVISION / (FP-OS-078)
Page 2 of 4
preventing groundwater and surface water degradation.
Manuals for guidance:
1. State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best
Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties.
Prepared by the Idaho Division of Environmental
Quality, July 1997.
2. Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook.
Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department,
May 2000.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the
City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall
be signed only at such time as:
1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed
and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the
completion of off-site and required on-site improvements.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAHINGS ANALYSIS
The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City
Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A
request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial
Review maybe filed.
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR PISA PLACE SUBDIVISION / (FP-OS-078)
Page 3 of 4
r -~
~J
in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-eight (28) days
after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,
Idaho Code.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ~~~"~ da
Y
of .~a~n<~ Q,i'L ~, , 2006.
By: ~' ~
T y de eerd
~,~~``~`'~~ ~ ~~~, i1°'''~~,,~~ Mayor, ity of Meridian
Attest: ~`~```~`~~ ~' L "'''~ '4,~~'r'
~,
illiam G. Berg, Jr., Ci Cl y ~,~
„,
Copy served upon Applicant, the P15~i
City Attorney. °
By: ,~
ity Clerk's Office
~~
°~~~'~//-ne.~.. Vic, A,, .°~ ,
,F,
Dated: a • I ~'0~0
Public Works Department, and
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR PISA PLACE SUBDIVISION / (FP-OS-078)
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~ING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR~ NTS STAFF REPORT
r
STAFF REPORT:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Hearing Date: January 17, 2006
Transmittal Date: January 12, 2006
Mayor & City Council
Ct°&'1° rte :yF _~, ~ • ~
~~, -u.~c~ t'
~„ ~
1~.
We have reviewed this
These conditions shall
Meridian City Council:
Sonya Watters, Assistant City Planner '
Michael Cole, Development Services Coordinator ~ C-
Pisa Place Subdivision
Request for Final Plat Approval of Pisa Place Subdivision Consisting of 16
Single-family Residential Building Lots and 1 Common/other Lot on 4.99 Acres
in an R-8 Zone by Briggs Engineering, Inc. (File# FP-OS-078)
submittal and offer the following comments and conditions of the applicant.
-e considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the
APPLICATION SUIVIlVIARY & LOCATION
The applicant, Briggs Engineering, Inc., has applied for final plat approval of Pisa Place Subdivision
which consists of 16 single-family residential building lots (there is an existing residence on Lot 7, Block
1), and 1 common/other lot on 4.99 acres in an R-8 zone. The gross density for this subdivision is 3.21
dwelling units per acre. The net density is 4.06 dwelling units per acre.
Pisa Place Subdivision is a subdivision of a previously un-platted parcel of land located in a portion of the
southeast 1/4 of the northeast % of section 30, T.3N, R.IE. The site is located on the west side of Locust
Grove Road, approximately %i mile south of Victory.
The fmal plat changed slightly from the approved preliminary plat. The right-of--way width of E. Pisa
Court and S. Leaning Tower Place was reduced from 64 feet to 52 feet, which reduced the frontage of
Lots 8, 10, and 11, Block 1. The resulting street frontage of these lots still meets the minimum
requirements of Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-2A-3B.1. The final plat substantially complies
with the approved preliminary plat.
Staff recommends approval of Pisa Place Subdivision with the comments and conditions stated in this
report.
SITE SPECIFIC REQUIItEMENTS
Applicant is to meet all terms of the approved annexation (AZ-OS-039) and preliminary plat (PP-
OS-038).
2. The applicant has indicated Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District will own the pressurized
irrigations system in this proposed development. Since it is to be owned and operated by an
Irrigation District then a license agreement shall be entered into prior to the scheduling of a pre-
construction meeting.
The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round
source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, asingle-point connection to the
culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer
Exhibit "A"
FP-OS-078 Pisa Place Sub FP.doc PAGE 1
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~ING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR• NTS STAFF REPORT
shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the irrigable common areas prior to
signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer.
4. All fencing installed on the site must be in compliance with UDC 11-3A-6 and 11-3A-7.
Temporary construction fencing to contain debris shall be installed at the subdivision boundary
where permanent fencing does not exist.
5. The applicant will be responsible for all costs associated with the sewer and water service
extension. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services are
available from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as
landscape irrigation.
6. Sanitary sewer and water service to this site is being proposed from existing stubs in the
Chatsworth Development to the west. These mains are installed but not activated yet. The City
of Meridian does not guarantee service in the timelines outlined in the UDC.
7. The applicant shall install all sewer mains necessary to serve this development. The applicant
shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department. Cover over sanitary
sewer mains shall be no less than three feet from finish grade to the top of the pipe. If cover is
less than three feet from the sub-grade to the top of the pipe, alternated pipe materials shall be
used per the Meridian Public Work's Standard Specifications.
The applicant will be responsible to construct all water mains necessary to serve this proposed
development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works
Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any
mains that are required to provide service.
9. The applicant shall be responsible for the payment of assessments and the actual hook up to
municipal services for the existing house.
10. Remove all buildings that do not meet setbacks or the zoning ordinance prior to signature on the
final plat by the City Engineer.
11. The applicant shall submit a recorded cross access agreement with the property to the north if the
driveway access to the existing home on Lot 7, Block 1 of Pisa Place Subdivision is placed on
Lot 11, Block 6 of Chatsworth Subdivision prior to signature on the final plat by the City
Engineer.
12. Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's "Final" letter for the street
names and lot & block numbering. Make all corrections necessary to comply.
13. A sidewalk easement in favor of Ada County Highway District is required for the sidewalk
located within the street buffer along S. Locust Grove Road; revise plat accordingly.
14. Revise the situate statement to read, "Meridian. Ada County, Idaho".
15. In the Certificates of Owners correct the spelling of "Real PPoint of Beginning", to read "Real
Point of Beginning".
16. Graphically depict an 8-foot wide Public Utilities, Drainage and Irrigation easement on the
eastern boundary of Lot 13, Block 1. The extra width is necessary to accommodate an irrigation
main being installed.
Exhibit "A"
FP-OS-078 Pisa Place Sub FP.doc PAGE 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS STAFF REPORT
17. Graphically depict a 5-foot wide Public Utilities, Drainage and Irrigation easement on the western
boundaries of Lot 17, Block 1. It will be an interior lot line to an existing phase.
18. The landscape plan, prepared by The Land Group and dated 12/13/05, shall be revised as follows:
a. Street trees within the parkway are required at 1 per 35 linear feet and shall be centered
within the parkway planter per UDC 11-3B-7C.3. Class II trees are the preferred parkway
trees.
b. Include the tree class in the plant schedule for all trees shown.
Submit 3 copies of the revised landscape plan to the Planning Department prior to signature on
the fznal plat by the City EngineeY
19. Revise or add the following note(s) on the face of the plat dated 11/11/O5, prepared by Briggs
Engineering, Inc., prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer:
(1.) Revise to read: "...lot drainage and Meridian City street lights over the
( fourteen (141 feet adjacent to any public..."
(9.) Revise to read: "... in compliance with Title 11 ~--a of the Meridian ~ Unified
Development Code ra;+~--« ~~~
--
(10.) "...is not allowed ' •~ " e~tt Q b o , ~ ~~' y ,:„ : +'- ~'•+, *~
(11.) Include instrument number.
20. Complete the Certificate of Owners and accompanying acknowledgement.
21. The applicant's professional engineer shall submit a signed stamped statement that the centerline
elevations are a minimum of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater
elevation.
22. Maintenance of all common areas shall be the responsibility of the Pisa Place Homeowners'
Association.
23. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved preliminary plat does
not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance.
GENERAL REQUIItEMENTS
All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or
lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6.
Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users
association (ditch owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works
Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, alternative plans will be
reviewed and approved by the meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature.
2. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed,
drainage lots constructed, road base shall be approved by the Ada County Highway District, and
the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits.
3. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% shall be required for all uncompleted
fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to
signature on the final plat.
Exhibit "A"
FP-OS-078 Pisa Place Sub FP.doc PAGE 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PL~NING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS STAFF REPORT
4. All development improvements, including but not limited to water, sewer, fencing, micro-paths,
pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining
certificates of occupancy.
A written certificate of completion shall be prepared by the landscape architect, landscape
designer or qualified nurseryman responsible for the landscape plan upon completion of the
landscape installation. The Certificate of Completion shall verify that all landscape
improvements, including plant materials and sprinkler installation, are in substantial compliance
with the approved landscape plan.
6. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the fmal plat
per Resolution 02-374.
7. Any existing domestic wells andlor septic systems within this project will have to be removed
from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for
non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building
pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
9. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting
that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
10. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES Permitting that
maybe required by the Environmental Protection Agency.
11. All development features shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair
Housing Act.
12. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing
additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed.
Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to
be removed.
13. Approval of the preliminary plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to record the
final plat within two years of the approval of the preliminary plat per UDC 11-6B-7A. In the
event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and
reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments,
if submitted within successive intervals of eighteen months, maybe considered for final approval
without resubmission for preliminary plat approval per UDC 11-6B-7B.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Pisa Place Subdivision with the above stated comments
and conditions.
Exhibit "A"
FP-OS-078 Pisa Place Sub FP.doc PAGE 4
•
`~"~s~~t (~re;en
~~
I°rorn: Sonya Watters
Serat: Yhurs€Jay, January 12, 2066 2:00 PI'Ji
To: Jessica Johnson; tUtachelle t-lill; Sharon Smith; 'Tara Green; 1lilill t3erg
Subject: Pisa Ptace Subdivision Fina! Flat Response to Staff Report
follow Up Flag. Follow up
t~lag Status: Green
Sonya,
We agree to the conditions of approval for Pisa Place Subdivision. (FP-05-078)
Kevin Harris
Briggs Engineering
-----Original Message-----
From: Sonya Watters [mailto:watterss@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 11:34 AM
To: kevin
Cc: Jessica Johnson; Machelle Hill; Sharon Smith; Tara Green; Will Berg
Subject: Pisa Place Subdivision Final Plat Staff Report
Attached is the final plat staff report for Pisa Place Subivision.
Please submit a written response to the staff report to me prior to the Council meeting
next Tuesday.
Thanks,
Sonya
Sonya Watters ~~~~~~~
CITY OF MERIDIAN
Planning Department
660 E. Watertower Ln., Ste. 202
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208)884-5533 Fax: (208)888-6854 -~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~-._w~~~~~__~~.._
I:ajiit~it '•13"
•
FP 05-081
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2006
APPLICANT Capital Development, Inc. ITEM NO. 9
REQUEST Final Plat approval of 30 single-family residential building lots and 2
common lots on 9.28 acres in a R$ zone for Settlement Bridge Subdivision No. 4 -
southeast corner of Norfh Locust Grove Road and East McMillan Road
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
COMMENTS
See attached Staff Comments
Contacted: Date: Phone:
Emailed: Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the CHy of aleridian.
i !
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
C/C January 17, 2006
IN THE MATTER OF THE
APPLICATION OF CAPITAL
DEVELOPMENT, INC., FOR FINAL
PLAT APPROVAL OF 30 SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUIDLING
LOTS AND 1 COMMON AREA LOT
ON 4.99 ACRES IN AN R-8 ZONE
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF NORTH LOCUST
GROVE ROAD AND EAST
MCMILLAN ROAD INTHE N % OF
THE NW 1/a OF T. 4N., R. lE.,
SECTION 32
CASE NO. FP-05-081
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to
Unified Development Code 11-6B-3 on January 17, 2006, and the Council finding that the
Administrative Review is complete from Sonya Wafters, Assistant City Planner for the Planning and
Zoning Department, and Michael Cole, Development Services Coordinator for the Public Works
Department, dated: Hearing Date: January 17, 2006, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council
having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING SETTLEMENT BRIDGE SUBDIVISION NO.
4, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2006,
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR SETTLEMENT BRIDGE SUBDIVISION N0.4 / (FP-OS-081)
Page 1 of 3
HANDWRITTEN DATE:
i
12/7/05, SHEET 1 OF 4, ENGINEERING
NORTHWEST, LLC", CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT, INC., Developer, is
Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in
the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Sonya Wafters, Assistant City
Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department and Michael Cole, Development
Services Coordinator for the Public Works Department, dated: Hearing Date: January
17, 2006, listing 16 SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS/FINAL PLAT and 13
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto
marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of 4 pages, and by this reference incorporated
herein, and the response letter from Engineering Northwest, LLC, a true and correct
copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "B" and consisting of 2 pages, and
by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Capital
Development, Inc., a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked
Exhibit "C", and by this reference incorporated herein.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the
City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall
be signed only at such time as:
1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed
and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the
completion of ofF site and required on-site improvements.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR SETTLEMENT BRIDGE SUBDIVISION N0.4 / (FP-OS-081)
Page 2 of 3
AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS
The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City
Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A
request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial
Review maybe filed.
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest
in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-eight (28) days
after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67,
Idaho Code.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ~ ~ day
of ,~ , 2006.
By: ~~~
`®,,~~~4~ao~coa-ss~~,~ammy de eerd
.."`~\~~~Q~ ~~'` door, City of Meridian
Attest: ,
r~ ~-
~ ?
William G. Berg, Jr., City lerk
- °~ ~~
~.~ c
Copy served upon Applicant, the Planifi,~~n ~ ""~ ° went, Public Works Department, and
City ttorney. "~ ~, r , ~ ~.~`~ ~,~~~~°.
'~,, ,,~~
a~...,
BY~ '~ Dated: ~ -I~~(~l
City Clerk's Office
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR SETTLEMENT BRIDGE SUBDIVISION N0.4 / (FP-OS-081)
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~fNING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS STAFF REPORT
STAFF REPORT:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Hearing Date: January 17, 2006
Transmittal Date: January 13, 2006
Mayor & City Council
a ,
~ "
e ear n~ i~ ~ obi }
,~` '°-~,
z ~ a ~ ~~
ii tL?,~li-If7
'%i
.~r~`~ -
'~~ ~
~~~. a',~,.s5~~, ~;tw~sl'' ~'
We have reviewed this
These conditions shall
Meridian City Council:
Sonya Wafters, Assistant City Planner "
Michael Cole, Development Services Coordinator ~ C
Settlement Bridge Subdivision No. 4
Request for Final Plat Approval of Settlement Bridge Subdivision No. 4
Consisting of 30 Single-family Residential Building Lots and 2 Common/other
Lots on 9.28 Acres in an R-8 Zone by Capital Development, Inc (File# FP-OS-
081)
submittal and offer the following comments and conditions of the applicant.
be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the
APPLICATION SUMMARY & LOCATION
The applicant, Capital Development, Inc., has applied for final plat approval of Settlement Bridge
Subdivision No. 4, which consists of 30 single-family residential building lots and 2 common/other lots
on 9.28 acres in an R-8 zone. The gross density for this subdivision is 3.44 dwelling units per acre. The
net density is 4.12 dwelling units per acre.
Settlement Bridge Subdivision No. 4 is a subdivision of a previously un-platted parcel of land located in a
portion of the north 1/2 of the northwest'/ of section 32, T.4N, R.lE. The site is generally located off the
southeast corner of N. Locust Grove Road and E. McMillan Road.
A conditional use permitlplanned development was approved for this subdivision that allowed for
reductions to the minimum standards for lot size (to 4,031 s.f. for attached lots and 5,250 s.f. for detached
lots) and street frontage (to 40 feet for attached lots on straight-away streets and 28 feet for lots on
corners/cul-de-sacs, 58 feet for detached lots on straight-away streets and 30 feet for lots on corners/cul-
de-sacs, lots sharing common driveways aren't required to have any street frontage); however, none of the
lots within this phase are below the minimum dimensional standards of the R-8 zone.
The final plat shows two less building lots than was approved on the preliminary plat; however, staff has
no objection to this change as the applicant is not increasing the number of buildable lots from what was
previously approved. A small amount of open space was also eliminated at the rear of Lots 1-4 and Lots
6-8, Block 16. The Planning Director has approved this minor modification. Staff fords that the proposed
final plat substantially complies with the approved Preliminary Plat. NOTE: Staff has concerns with
ensuring that the overall development is providing the open space required. Therefore, staff has contacted
the applicant's engineer and has requested calculations for open space. If the new open space calculations
are less than what was previously required with the development agreement/preliminary plat/conditional
use permit, staff will bring this up as an issue at the City Council meeting.
Staff recommends approval of Settlement Bridge Subdivision No. 4 with the comments and conditions
stated in this report.
Exhibit "A"
FP-OS-081 Settlement Bridge #4 FP.doc PAGE 1
CITY OF MERIDIAN PL~NING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS STAFF REPORT
SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. Applicant is to meet all terms of the approved annexation (AZ-03-035), development agreement
(Inst. No. 104061807), preliminary plat (PP-03-041), and conditional use permit (CUP-03-065).
2. The applicant has indicated the pressurized irrigation system in this proposed development is to
be owned and operated as a private system. Since it is to be owned and operated by a
homeowner's association plans will be reviewed and approved by the Public Works department
as a part of the construction plan approval.
3. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round
source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, asingle-point connection to the
culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer
shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the irrigable common areas prior to
signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer.
4. All fencing installed on the site must be in compliance with UDC 11-3A-6 and 11-3A-7.
Temporary construction fencing to contain debris shall be installed around the perimeter of this
phase unless permanent fencing already exists at the subdivision boundary.
5. The applicant will be responsible for all costs associated with the sewer and water service
extension. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services are
available from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as
landscape irrigation.
6. Sanitary sewer service to this site is being proposed via extension of mains in a previous phase.
The applicant shall install all sewer mains necessary to serve this development. The applicant
shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department. Cover over sanitary
sewer mains shall be no less than three feet from finish grade to the top of the pipe. If cover is
less than three feet from the sub-grade to the top of the pipe, alternated pipe materials shall be
used per the Meridian Public Work's Standard Specifications.
7. Water service to this site is being proposed via extension of mains in a previous phase. The
applicant will be responsible to construct all water mains necessary to serve this proposed
development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works
Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any
mains that are required to provide service.
8. Remove all buildings that do not meet setbacks established in the Unified Development Code,
prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer.
Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's "Final" letter for the street
names and lot & block numbering. Make all corrections necessary to comply.
10. Include the CP&F number for the north 1/16 corner pin common to lots 31/32 on the face of the
plat.
11. It appears that the data in the curve table is not accurate, specifically arc lengths of curves C-38,
C-40, C-41, and C-42. The applicant shall confirm this information and make any corrections to
ensure that the curve data is accurate.
12. The landscape plan, prepared by The Land Group and dated 12/12/05, shall be revised as follows:
Exhibit "A"
FP-OS-081 Settlement Bridge #4 FP.doc PAGE 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN PL~NING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR•ENTS STAFF
REPORT
a. Fencing is required along the two micropaths located on Lot 13, Block 16 leading to the
open space area in compliance with UDC 11-3A-7A.7. Show location & detail of
proposed fencing on the plan.
b. Include tree class in plant schedule.
Submit 3 copies of the Yevised landscape plan to the Planning Department pNioN to signatuYe on
the final plat by the City EngineeY.
13. Revise or add the following note(s) on the face of the plat dated 12/7/05, prepared by Engineering
Northwest, LLC., prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer:
(1.) Revise to read: "All lot lines common to a public right-of--way have a thirteen (13) foot
wide public utilities, property drainage & irrigation easement, all lot lines common to the
exterior boundary have a ten (10) foot wide public utilities, property drainage & property
irrigation easement."
(4.) Include Lot 30, Block 16 as a common lot.
(7.) "...in compliance with Title 11 ~ of the Meridian City Code..."
14. Complete the Certificate of Owners and accompanying acknowledgement.
15. The applicant's professional engineer shall submit a signed stamped statement that the centerline
elevations are a minimum of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater
elevation.
16. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved annexation,
development agreement, preliminary plat, or conditional use permit does not relieve the Applicant
of responsibility for compliance.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways and the North Slough,
intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area. being subdivided shall be tiled
per UDC 11-3A-6. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district,
or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the
Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, alternative
plans will be reviewed and approved by the meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature.
2. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed,
drainage lots constructed, road base shall be approved by the Ada County Highway District, and
the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits.
3. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% shall be required for all uncompleted
fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to
signature on the final plat.
4. All development improvements, including but not limited to water, sewer, fencing, micro-paths,
pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining
certificates of occupancy.
5. A written certificate of completion shall be prepared by the landscape architect, landscape
designer or qualified nurseryman responsible for the landscape plan upon completion of the
landscape installation. The Certificate of Completion shall verify that all landscape
Exhibit "A"
FP-OS-081 Settlement Bridge #4 FP.doc PAGE 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR~ENTS STAFF REPORT
improvements, including plant materials and sprinkler installation, are in substantial compliance
with the approved landscape plan.
6. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final plat
per Resolution 02-374.
7. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed
from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for
non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
8. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building
pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
9. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting
that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
10. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES Permitting that
may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency.
11. All development features shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair
Housing Act.
12. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing
additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed.
Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to
be removed.
13. Approval of the preliminary plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to record the
final plat within two years of the approval of the preliminary plat per UDC 11-6B-7A. In the
event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and
reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments,
if submitted within successive intervals of eighteen months, may be considered for final approval
without resubmission for preliminary plat approval per UDC 11-6B-7B.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Settlement Bridge Subdivision No. 4 with the above
stated comments and conditions.
Exhibit "A"
FP-OS-081 Settlement Bridge #4 FP.doc PAGE 4
En~i~eerin,~ Nar~thWest, LAC
423 N. Ancestor Place, Suite 180 Souse, Idaho 83704 (208) 376-5000 • Fax (206) 37G-SSSG
January 13, 2006
Mayor and City Council
City of Meridian
660 E. Watertower, Suite 200
Meridian,lD 83642
Re: File No. FP-OS-081 Settlement Bridge No. 4
I am writing on behalf of our client, Capital Development, who have indicated to us their
acceptance of the conditions of approval as outlined by staff for the above referenced.
Our response to the City's Site Specific Comments for this project is as follows:
Application Summary & Location
1) Staffhas requested a revised calculation of the open space for this project. The
preliminary plat figures indicated 7.93 acres with the North Slough included and
7.37 acres without the North Slough. As of January 16, 2006 the open area
calculations are 8.94 acres with the North Slough and 8.38 acres without the
North Slough.
City of Meridian -Conditions of Approval
1) All terms of the approved annexation (AZ-03-035), development agreement
(Inst. No. 1 0406 1 807), preliminary plat (PP-03-041), and conditional use permit
(CUP-03-065) have been met.
2) The Settlement Bridge Homeowner's Association will own and maintain the
pressure irrigation system within this development.
3) An irrigation well will be continued for use as a secondary source as in phases 1,
2 & 3.
4) Agree.
S) Agree.
6) Agree.
7) Agree.
8) Agree.
9) An Ada County Street Name Committee "Final" letter will be submitted prior to
the signing of the final plat.
10) The plat will be revised to go to the %, corner instead of the 1/16` corner. A
CP&F number will be included for the %a corner common to sections 31 & 32.
1 I) The curve data on the face of the plat has been revised.
12) The landscape plan will be revised as needed and 3 copies will be submitted prior
to sigtung the final plat.
13) Face of plat -Notes
Note 1 has been revised as follows: "All lot lines common to a public right-ol=
way have a thirteen (13) foot wide public utilities, property drainage & property
irrigation easement, all lot lines common to the exterior boundary have a ten (10)
foot wide public utilities, property drainage & property irrigation easement unless
dimensioned otherwise."
Note 4 has been revised to include Lot 30, block 16 as a common lot.
Note 7 has been revised to eliminate "and Titlel2" from the note.
14) The Certificate of Owners and acknowledgment will be completed prior to
signing the final plat.
1 S) A letter has been submitted with the final plat application concerning centerline to
groundwater elevation. ~, ~.
16) Agree.
Geaeral Requirements
1) Agree.
2) Agree.
3) A letter of credit will be submitted for those items not already installed or
constructed.
4) Agree.
S) Agree.
6) Agree.
7) There are no known wells or septic systems within this phase.
8) No engineered backfill is required on this phase of the project.
9) There are no 404 issues with this phase of the development.
10) Agree.
11) Agree.
12) Agree.
13) Agree.
Should you have any questions or need anything else feel free to give me a call.
ank you,
Jason S. Davies, P.E.
Xc: Dave Yorgason, Capital Development
2
Exhibit "B"
Jan 17 2006 10:53RM CR~RL DEVELOPMENT 2083`753271
CAFITAI.
D~VELQPIVIENT, Iac.
January 17, 2006
City of Meridian
Honorable Mayor,
Members of the City Council, Sc
Planning Department Staff
Re: Settlemient Bridge Subdivision No. 4
To Whom It May Concern:
Thank you for the staff report we received regarding Settleanent Bridge 31io. 4. We are
submitting this written response to the requirements outlined in~ the staff report for the public
hearing tonight. .
We agree to comply with all the Site Specific Requirements as outlined in numbers 1-16 with the
following additional comments: _
Item #3: ®Ve wily use an irtrigetion wel[ as a,baclc up'water source as we have done in prior.phases
of the subdivision. ~ .
Item #5: There are no existing domestic.wells or septic systems within this phase.
Item #B: There are nq.existing buildings on this property, ;
Sincerely,
~ f o~tl~
Dave Yorgason .
Vice President ~ ~ .
'- 6200 Borth Meeker Place Bolse, Idaho 83713
Office: (208j 377-3939 FcAC (208) 375-3271
' ~ ; ~ . Exhibit ~.C~. ..
p.2
• •
January 13, 2006
CPA 05-004
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2006
APPLICANT ITEM NO. ~ O
REQUEST Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to amend the text and
future land use map of the 2002 Comprehensive Plan for the North Meridian Area and
to expand the area of city impact boundary
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
COMMENTS
See attached PiiZ Item Packet / Minutes
See attached Recommendations /Findings
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER: See attached Letters / Ematls
Contacted: Date: Phone:
Emailed: Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Cffy of Meridian.
~ •
January 13, 2006
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2006
APPLICANT ITEM NO.
REQUEST Ordinance - Vicious Dog
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
GITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
See attached Ordiemnce
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ~~
/~~/
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ~ i 6
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY D
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
us wESr:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted: Date: Phone:
Emailed: Staff Initials:
Materials presented at pub~a meetings shall become properly of the CNy of Meridktn.
• e
CITY OF MERIDL~N ORDINANCE NO. ®~ _ ~Z `~
BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, ROUNTREE, WARDLE
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 6, CHAPTER 2, OF THE MERIDL~N
CITY CODE REGARDING DEFINITIONS OF VICIOUS DOGS; VOLUNTARY
DISPOSAL OF DOGS; DOGS ATTACKING PERSONS OR OTHER DOMESTIC
ANIMALS; AND OWNING OR KEEPING OF VICIOUS DOGS; PROVIDING
FOR REVIEW OF THE DECISION THAT DECLARES A DOG TO BE
VICIOUS; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR A
SUMMARY; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO:
Section 1. That Title 6, Chapter 2, of the Meridian City Code is amended to read
as follows:
6-2-1: DEFINITIONS:
As used in this Chapter, the following terms shall be defined as in this Section provided:
VICIOUS DOG: Any d~a ~xh;~h h~ ~ ~, ~~,~~ti +~ a• •+• ~ _ _ ~L ,
Any dou whose behavior or actions fall within the one or more of the followin
definitions shall be declared a vicious do
A_ Any dou which, when unprovoked in a vicious or terrorizing manner approaches any
person in apparent attitude of attack which placed a reasonable fear in such a person that
such violence was imminent upon the streets sidewalks any public urounds or
places, or private property not owned or possessed by the owner of the dog• or
B. Anv dou which when unprovoked attacks or bites another Berson or other domestic
anunal upon the streets sidewalks any ublic grounds or places or private rp Operty not
owned or possessed by the owner of the dog • or
C. Any dou with a prior history or documented incidents of attack orbiting of persons or
other animals, or disposition to attack unprovoked to cause injury or to otherwise
endanuer the safety of persons or other domestic animals• or
D. Any dou owned or harbored primaril or in part for the pu~pr ose of fi tinu or
attackmu people or any dou trained for fighting or attacking of persons
EXCEPTIONS: Notwithstanding the definition of a vicious dou above•
VICIOUS DOG ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page 1 of 5
• •
1. No dog may be declared vicious if an injury or damage is sustained by a person
who, at the time of such in~ury or damage was sustained•
a) was committing a willful trespass or other crime or tort upon the t~remises
occupied by the owner of the dog (this does not require the owner to be present at
the time of the unlawful trespass or other crime); Or
b) was teasing, tormenting abusing or assaulting the dog:, or
c) was committing or attempting to commit a crime.
2. No dog may be declared vicious if the do was rotecting or defending a person
within the immediate vicuuty of the dog from an unjustified attack or assault
3. No dog owned maintained or kept for work as a law enforcement do either
currently or refired, may be declared vicious if the action that would be so defined by this
ordinance, took place while the dog was acting within its ca achy for law enforcement
oses. (Ord. 379, 9-2-1980; amd. 1999 Code; Ord - 2005)
~ 1 [l. ~7l17 TTATT A DV T7QDl1Q A T /~ n/»C T. Ti
i
7
,...~ ..~ . _
r ~
~~
6-2-10: DOGS PAS ATTACHING ORBITING PERSONS
OR OTHER DOMESTIC ANIMALS:
Any owner keeper or person who has the care and custod of a dog that either
A. when unprovoked in a vicious or terrorizing manner approaches anv person in
apparent attitude of attack upon the streets sidewalks anv public grounds or places or
pnvate property not owned or possessed by the owner of the dog; or
B. which, when unprovoked attacks or bites another person or other domestic animal
upon the streets, sidewalks anv public grounds or places or private ropertv not owned
or possessed by the owner of the doh;
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor In addition to anv other penaltyprescribed by law the
Crtv of Mendian may seize the offending dog pursuant to its ordinances. (Ord. 379, 9-2-
1980, Ord-2005)
6-2-20: OWNING OR KEEPING VICIOUS DOGS:
VICIOUS DOG ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page 2 of 5
~ i
A.
No person ownin or keeping a vicious dog shall•
1. Allow or permit the dos to so beyond the premises of such person unless such
dos is securely leashed and muzzled
2. Fail to securely confine the vicious dog A dog is securely confined where it is
mdoors with no access to the outside or in a securely enclosed or locked pen or
structure on the premises with secure sides and top and where the sides are
secured to the bottom or embedded in the ground no less than two feet
3. Allow the dos to be without the to as required by this ordinance whether on
the owner's premises or not.
B. License: When a dog is declared vicious or is seized by the City of Meridian a
Vicious Dos License must be acquired and worn by the dog at all times The license can
be purchased from the Meridian City Clerk Meridian City Police or Meridian Animal
Control. All the requirements of insurance and identification as described in this section
must be satisfied to acquire the license If the license is not secured within the time
allowed for mamtenance of the dos b the City of Meridian or other temporary custodian
of the dos desisnated by the City of Meridian the animal may be disposed of pursuant to
this Code or Ci policY
C. Insurance: All owners or keepers of a vicious dog must rovide proof to the City
Clerk of liability insurance in a sinsle incident amount of five hundred thousand dollars
500,000.001 for bodily iniurv to or death of any person or persons or for damn a to
property owned by any person which may result from the ownership keeping or
maintenance of such animal. Such insurance policy shall provide that no cancellation of
the policy will be made unless ten (101 days written notice is first provided to the City
Clerk.
D. Identification: All owners or keepers of a vicious dog must provide to animal control
two color photosraphs of the dog showin clearly the size and markinss of the animal
The animal must wear a collar at all times with a Vicious Doi License attached as
required by the Crtv, securely affixed and clearly visible.
A violation of any section of this ordinance is a misdemeanor
6-2-21: DUE PROCESS AFTER DOG DECLARED VICIOUS:
VICIOUS DOG ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page 3 of 5
A. If a dog is declared vicious under the definition of this ordinance by the City of
Meridian, the owner of the vicious dog may seek review of that decision by the Chief of
Police or designee prior to obtaining that dog's Vicious Doi License If not satisfied
with the determination made by the Chief or designee the owner may seek review by the
City Council. During the pendancy of the review hearings the dog must be maintained
by the City of Meridian or other tem orary custodian of the do desi agn~y the City of
Meridian.
B. If the owner of the dog wishes to seek review of a determination that their dog is
vicious and subiect to the requirements of this ordinance the owner must follow the
following_procedure:
1. File a Request for Review with the Meridian City Police or Meridian City
Animal Controh
2. A hearing will be scheduled within seven (71 working days of the receipt of
this r uest.
a. The hearnnu shall be informal, no rules of evidence shall apply and the
owner shall be allowed to present anv reasonable evidence as to why the
circumstances leading to the dog being declared vicious under this ordinance
should be re-evaluated.
b. The Chief or designee will hear all reasonable evidence and make a
finding upholdin¢ the original decision that the dog is vicious or rescinding that
decision.
c. The Chief or designee may establish procedures and time limits for the
hearing
d. A brief written fmdin~ must be completed by the Chief or designee
within three (3 working_davs.
3. If the owner is unsatisfied with the decision he or she may seek review of the
decision by the Citv Council. The City Council shall conduct a de novo review
following the same procedures and time limits established by the Chief or
designee. The Citv Council's decision shall be final
C. If a dog is declared vicious, the owner must secure a Vicious Dog License and follow
all the other requirements as set forth in this ordinance The owner shall be res onsible
for all costs associated with maintainin the dog by the City during the pendancv of these
hearings.
D. If the decision that the dog is vicious is rescinded the owner will not be required to
acquire a Vicious Doi License, but he or she still must may all costs associated with
maintainins the dog by the Citv during the pendencv of the review hearings before the
dog can be released to its owner.
6-2-2~2-: PENALTY:
VICIOUS DOG ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page 4 of 5
It shall be unlawfixl and punishable as a misdemeanor to violate any of the provisions of
this Chapter.
6-2-23: SEVERABILITY:
If anv provision or section of this Ordinance shall beheld to be invalid by a court of
competent jurisdiction then such brovision or section shall be considered separately and
apart from the remauuna brovisions or sections of this Ordinance which shall remain in
full force and effect. (Ord. 379, 9-2-1980; amd. - 2005)
Section 2. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (1/2) plus one (1) of
the Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and
one (1) reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this
Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after March 1, 2006.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this l ~~~
day of y ~~ ~ij , 2006.
/ ~~
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this ! 7 'day
of _ ~~~ ~,~ , 2006.
APPROVED:
ATTE T: ~~~ "~°
c ~~
CITY CLERK = ~
,, ,~ ~, ~.
Q
VICIOUS DOG ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page 5 of 5
NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A)
CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE N0.06- ! 26
PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT MERIDIAN CITY
VICIOUS DOGS ORDINANCE
An Ordinance of the City of Meridian amending Title 6, Chapter 2, of the Meridian
City Code regarding definitions of vicious dogs; voluntary disposal of dogs, dogs
attacking persons or other domestic animals, and owning or keeping vicious dogs; and a
procedure to review an administrative decision declaring a dog to be vicious.
A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian,
1411d~ 61
33 East Idaho Avenue Meridian Idaho. This ordl ~lr~ome effective March 1
> ,
2006 upon the passage and publication. `°°°°`~~~ ' h ~,~®~
~ ~~
~,~ e ~;
Mayor and City Council o e City of Meridian ~`~~ _
By: William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk °~
°9 &p-t . ~
' i e 7 F9 `av.
First Reading: l'l 7rm6 Adopted't~~ u~~uspension of the
Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code 50-902 ~'~~~~ ,.a`°° NO
Second Reading: 'Third Read'mg:
STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 06- IZ~LI
The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian,
Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of
the attached Ordinance No. 06- `Z l ~ of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and
has found the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public
pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A (3).
DATED this ~ ~ day of January, 2006p
c..~ ~ .J
William. L.M. Nary, Ci y
SUMMARY-VICIOUS DOG ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page 1 of 1
• •
January 13, 2006 AZ 05-017
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2006
APPLICANT Tuscany Development, Inc. ITEM NO. l2
REQUEST Ordinance -Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96
acres from RUT to R-8 zones for Messina Meadows Subdivision -South Eagle Road
between East Victory Road and East Amity Road
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
Date:
See attached Ordinance
Phone:
Staff Initials:
Ma#erlals presented at public meetings shall become property of the Ct1y of Meridian.
~ ~
January 13, 204b
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 17, 2t~6
APPLICANT ITEM NO 'I 3
REQUEST Gity Council President Liaison Assignments
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT: ~~ ~~
V" ~C
CITY FIRE DEPT: S ~ r,l, ~ ~~/-~
CITY BUILDING DEPT: ~ ~ ~ V" ~~
~ ~/Y~"
CITY WATER DEPT: ~ ~l 1 ""
~ 1 ~ ~
CITY l
SEWER DEPT: / ~'Y (j ~(
~ ~ St S ~
ITY 1'- v !~' ~
C PARKS DEPT. I „~i ,, ,~i O ~ I
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ~ I D
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ~'° ~~
~ ~' w~
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY ~
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: r n J
SETTLERS IRRIGATION: v ~
IDAHO PQWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted: Date: Phone•
Emailed: Staff Initials:
Malerkfis presented qt pubBc meel~gs shaft become properly of the CHy of Meridian.