Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-01-31 SpecialCITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, January 31, 2006 at 5:30 p.m. Meridian City Police Department Upstairs Training Room 1401 East Watertower Meridian, Idaho `Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter." 1. Roll -call Attendance: X Shaun Wardle Joe Borton X Charlie Rountree Keith Bird X Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. Adoption of the Agenda: ��jNov+v 3. Consent Agenda: 027"v,(_ A. Tabled from January 24, 2006: Development Agreement: AZ 05-017 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. — on South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road: 4. Tabled from January 24, 2006: Ordinance No. * l Z Z- : AZ 05-017 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. — on South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road: A?,,vv,4_- 5. Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1) (c) & (f): 6. Quarterly Update from Cheryl Brown, Economic Development Coordinator: pYYse-,Axt, Meridian City Council Special Meeting Agenda — January 31, 2006 Page 1 of 1 All materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. / 0 114 CITY OF ' {- c. CFN �R °IM. Tab vSU'RE V Y SINCE 1903 MAYOR Tammy de Weerd CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Keith Bird Joseph W. Borton Charles M. Rountree Shaun Wardle CITY DEPARTMENTS City Attorney/HR 703 Main Street 898-5506 (City Attorney) 898-5503 (HR) Fax 884-8723 Fire 540 E. Franklin Road 888-1234/fax 895-0390 Parks & Recreation 11 W. Bower Street 888-3579/fax 898-5501 Planning 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 202 884-5533/fax 888-6844 Police 1401 E. Watertower Lane 888-6678 / fax 846-7366 Public Works 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 200 898-5500/fax 895-9551 - Building 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 150 887-2211 / fax 887-1297 - Wastewater 3401 N. Ten Mile Road 888-2191/fax 884-0744 - Water 2235 N.W. 8th Street 888-5242/fax 884-1159 is NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a Special Meeting at Meridian Police Department, 1401 East Idaho Watertower, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, January 31, 2006 at 5:30 P.M. The Meridian City Council will discuss the following items: Tabled firm January 24, 2006: Development Agreement: AZ 05-017 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. - on South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road: Tabled from January 24, 2006: Ordinance No. : AZ 05417 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. - on South Eagle Road between East Vdory Road and East Amity Road: -Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1) (c) & (f): -Quarterly Update from Cheryl Brown, Economic Development Coordinator The public is welcome to attend the meeting. 0liH1NI/8®e��®®Aoa ```a`�e�,19tar,! DATED 27th day of January, 2006. 9 r-. A T - WILLIAM G. BERG, J ;; - CLER te° r<<JtIPIt11Nt01tt Meridian City Council Special Meeting —January 31, 2008 Page 1 of 1 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 8884433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 CITY CLERK— FAX 888-4218 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING —FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE— FAX 884-8119 Printed on recycled paper CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, January 31, 2006 at 5:30 p.m. Meridian City Police Department Upstairs Training Room 1401 East Watertower Meridian, Idaho `Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter." 1. Roll -call Attendance: Shaun Wardle Joe Borton Charlie Rountree Keith Bird Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda: A. Tabled from January 24, 2006: Development Agreement: AZ 05-017 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. — on South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road: 4. Tabled from January 24, 2006: Ordinance No. AZ 05-017 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. — on South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road: 5. Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1) (c) & (f): 6. Quarterly Update from Cheryl Brown, Economic Development Coordinator: Meridian City Council Special Meeting Agenda — January 31, 2006 Page 1 of 1 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. N40sl -fir R6"(_ 00-kcc- -olks l � MAYOR Tammy de Weerd CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Keith Bird Joseph W. Borton Charles M. Rountree Shaun Wardle CITY DEPARTMENTS City Attorney/HR 703 Main Street 898-5506 (City Attorney) 898-5503 (HR) Fax 884-8723 Fire 540 E. Franklin Road 888-1234/fax 895-0390 Parks & Recreation 11 W. Bower Street 888-3579/fax 898-5501 Planning 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 202 884-5533/fax 888-6844 Police 1401 E. Watertower Lane 888-6678 / fax 846-7366 Public Works 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 200 898-5500/fax 895-9551 - Building 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 150 887-2211/fax 887-1297 - Wastewater 3401 N. Ten Mile Road 888-2191/fax 884-0744 - Water 2235 N.W. 8th Street 888-5242/fax 884-1159 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a Special Meeting at Meridian Police Department, 9401 East Idaho Watertower, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, January 31, 2006 at 5:30 P.M. The Meridian City Council will discuss the following items: -Tabled from January 24, 2006: Development Agreement: AZ 05-017 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. - on South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road: -Tabled from January 24, 2006: Ordinance No. : AZ 06-017 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. - on South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road: ~Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1) (c) & (f): ~Quarterly Update from Cheryl Brown, Economic Development Coordinator The public is welcome to attend the meeting. Of DATED 27th day of January, 2006. WILLIAM G. BERG, 511Z CLE12 4 4 r let Aq Meridian City Council Special Meeting —January 31, 2006 Page 1 of 1 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's office at 8884433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 CITY CLERK -FAX 8884218 FINANCE & UTILRY BILLING -FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE- FAX 884-8119 Printed on recycled paper CITY OF _- IDAHO � tiF, d 1"' TREASURE VAuxY 7903 MAYOR Tammy de Weerd CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Keith Bird Joseph W. Borton Charles M. Rountree Shaun Wardle CITY DEPARTMENTS City Attorney/HR 703 Main Street 898-5506 (City Attorney) 898-5503 (HR) Fax 884-8723 Fire 540 E. Franklin Road 888-1234/fax 895-0390 Parks & Recreation 11 W. Bower Street 888-3579/fax 898-5501 Planning 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 202 884-5533/fax 888-6844 Police 1401 E. Watertower Lane 888-6678 / fax 846-7366 Public Works 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 200 898-5500/fax 895-9551 - Building 660 E. Watertower Lane Suite 150 887-2211/fax 887-1297 - Wastewater 3401 N. Ten Mile Road 888-2191/fax 884-0744 - Water 2235 N.W. 8th Street 888-5242/fax 884-1159 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a Special Meeting at Meridian Police Department, 9401 East Idaho Watertower, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, January 31, 2006 at 5:30 P.M. The Meridian City Council will discuss the following items: -Tabled from January 24, 2006: Development Agreement: AZ 05-017 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. - on South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road: -Tabled from January 24, 2006: Ordinance No. : AZ 06-017 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. - on South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road: ~Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1) (c) & (f): ~Quarterly Update from Cheryl Brown, Economic Development Coordinator The public is welcome to attend the meeting. Of DATED 27th day of January, 2006. WILLIAM G. BERG, 511Z CLE12 4 4 r let Aq Meridian City Council Special Meeting —January 31, 2006 Page 1 of 1 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's office at 8884433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 CITY CLERK -FAX 8884218 FINANCE & UTILRY BILLING -FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE- FAX 884-8119 Printed on recycled paper 0 Meridian City Council Special Meeting January 31, 2006 The Meridian City Council special meeting was called to order at 5:35 P.M. on Tuesday, January 31, 2006 by Mayor Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Keith Bird, Shaun Wardle and Charlie Rountree. Members Absent: Joe Borton. Staff Present: Ted Baird, Bruce Freckleton, Michael Cole, Anna Canning, Steve Siddoway, Bill Nary and Will Berg. Item 1. Roll -call Attendance: Roll call. X Shaun Wardle O Joe Borton X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird X Mayor Tammy de Weerd Item 2. Adoption of the Agenda: De Weerd: Item No. 2, adoption of the agenda. Bird: Madame Mayor. De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we adopt the agenda as published. Rountree: Second. Bird: And the ordinance number will be 06-1212. De Weerd: Okay, there is a motion to approve the agenda as presented. All those in favor say aye. THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MOTION CARRIED. Item 3. Consent Agenda: A. Tabled from January 24, 2006: Development Agreement: AZ 05-017 Request for Annexation and Zoning Meridian City Council Special Meeting • January 31, 2006 Page 2 of 15 of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. — on South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road: Approve Bird: Madame Mayor. De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we approve the consent agenda as published. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: Okay, motion to approve the consent agenda. Is there any discussion? Hearing none, Mr. Berg would you please call roll. Berg: Thank you Madame Mayor, members of the Council roll call vote. Bird, aye; Rountree, aye; Wardle, aye; and Borton is absent. De Weerd: Okay thank you. THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MOTION CARRIED. Item 4. Tabled from January 24, 2006: Ordinance No. 06-1212 : AZ 05-017 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina Meadows Subdivision by Tuscany Development, Inc. — on South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road: De Weerd: Okay, Item No. 4 tabled from the January 24th meeting with Ordinance No. 06-1212. Mr. Berg would you please read by title only. Berg: Thank you Madame Mayor, members of the Council. (Inaudible) 06-1212 an Ordinance for Messina Meadows Subdivision for Annexation of property located in the south Y2 section 29, and all of Lot 2, Block 11, of proposed Messina Hills Subdivision No. 2 lying in township 3 north, range 1 east, Boise, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho as described in attachment "A" and annexing certain lands and territory, situated in Ada County, Idaho and adjacent and contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian as requested by the City of Meridian; establishing and determining the land use zoning classification of said lands from RUT (Ada County) to R-8 (medium density) in the Meridian City code; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and Meridian City Council Special Meeting January 31, 2006 Page 3 of 15 providing for a summary of the ordinance; reading rules; and providing an effective date. 0 and providing for a waiver of the De Weerd: Thank you. You have heard this ordinance heard by title only. Is there anyone who would like to hear it read in its entirety? Hearing none, Council I would entertain a motion to approve the Ordinance No. 06-1212. Rountree: Madame Mayor. De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I move we approve Ordinance No. 06-1212. Bird: Second. De Weerd: Okay motion to approve by Councilman Rountree, second by Councilman Bird to approve Item No. 4. Mr. Berg will you please call roll. Berg: Thank you Madame Mayor, members of the Council roll call vote. Rountree, aye; Bird, aye; Wardle, aye; and Borton is absent. THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MOTION CARRIED. Item 5. Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1) (c) & (f): De Weerd: Do I have a motion? Bird: Madame Mayor. De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I ask a question to you and the Council members. Seeing how our famous executive sessions (inaudible--------------------------), item agenda No. 6 could go first with your permission or is there a reason it is last? De Weerd: Mr. Bird, yeah, the reason I had — we (inaudible---) behind is we thought by then the Planning and Zoning Commission would be here and then they can hear the report as well. Bird: Okay. Nary: Madame Mayor. De Weerd: Mr. Nary. fo Meridian City Council special Meeting January 31, 2006 Page 4 of 15 Nary: The only thing that I was going to interject was Madame Mayor and Councilman Bird that if for some reason the Executive Session will take longer than 20 minutes or something we can always continue that matter to the end of your other workshop to complete that so you don't have to feel rushed. Bird: I move that we go into Executive Session Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1) (c) & (f). Rountree: Second. De Weerd: Okay, the motion is to move into Executive Session. Mr. Berg will you please call roll? Berg: Thank you Madame Mayor, members of the Council roll call vote. Bird, aye; Rountree, aye; Wardle, aye; and Borton is absent. De Weerd: Thank you. THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MOTION CARRIED. De Weerd: Okay, I would entertain a motion to come out of Executive Session. Rountree: So moved. Bird: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MOTION CARRIED. Item 6. Quarterly Update from Cheryl Brown, Economic Development Coordinator: Brown: I will keep it short. How much time? This front page is really the one want to focus on. The rest of it if we don't get to it are statistics and graphs for you and some updates that I wanted to give you. This is the plan that I am looking at for this coming year and following this economic development strategic plan. I am going to start with our economic development division, which is the merging businesses, the value of jobs and the downtown revitalization. Going onto the next one is creating city-wide division and synergistic commercial employment areas for all of Meridian. Looking at infrastructure plan, master plan and vision and recruitment plan, focus recruitment initiatives, guidelines and target lists. The downtown coordinating redevelopment efforts with MDC and Meridian identity and marketing strategy and overall branding regional Meridian City Council Special Meeting Is January 31, 2006 Page 5 of 15 awareness in downtown revitalization tying in with our overall marketing plan and I would love to hear any comments, any suggestions, any input and you don't need to give that to me tonight, you can come in or email me any comments after you look at this; but I would love your input, any suggestions you have on this that might help. If you go on to the next page, this is just kind of an update of our top ten employers and where they are at right now with employee counts and as you see a lot of them have gone up. Meridian, right now — our unofficial population that I got from COMPASS is at 64,816 people. Ada County added 9,047 jobs just this last year and I don't have some of the current steps that way because they don't come out until June, but a lot of the 9,000 right there is Meridian. De Weerd: Is that gross or net? Brown: Gross. Commerce and Labor does not break it out per city, but it's just by counting. I am still trying to get them to break it out by city. The next page we have got some of our other major employers and where they are at with their employees, with their employee counts. I wanted to go over MDC update. I wanted to add in there that Silverstone right now has 5,200 employees and they are going to be expanding to 9,500. Currently, they have 56 tenants out there at Silverstone. I am still waiting for EI Dorado's numbers. They haven't sent them in yet. Blue Cross, I am working on their expansion right now and their numbers are in there. Meridian Market Place has 30 employees right now, expanding to 50 and they have 14 tenants expanding to 22. 1 just got that list emailed over to me right before I walked out the door and that is why it is not included in here. I am working on a business packet with all of the tenants, how many employees are out there, total square footage, total value at build -out and what percentage of build -out we are at currently. The MDC update that I got from Clair Bowman — things that MDC has been working on is they have contracted for a master plan effective February 1St with an RBF consulting group in design studio. The Double D should be moving to their new location at Victory and Meridian Road within the next few days. No date is set for their demolition from the old building yet. MDC has initiated a process attempting to add 20 acres to the city's tax roles. The new Heritage Theatre Company has moved into Yanke's building on Taylor Street. The Gateway project is expected to be started and completed of March '06. This will be constructed at the Main Street and Meridian Road crossing, the artist selection has been approved, the inter op construction of the phase for the base on either side. What I have done with MDC is I have met with Dave Buich on his project. I met with his architect and went over the plans with him. I met with the realtors that will be selling the condos on the top of the building and he is looking at clearing the ground in 30 days and breaking ground in April and I am holding him to it. I met with MDC on another two to five acre project that is wanting to locate in downtown Meridian. They would like shared parking. The response that they got was that they needed to get a realtor. They needed to assemble parcels and I guess I am asking City Council to help me out a little bit here with downtown. Parking structure seems to be — parking seems to be an Meridian City Council Special Meeting January 31, 2006 Page 6 of 15 issue with a lot of the companies that I have been talking to about locating in downtown. Where are we going to park? You know, what are we going to do? So, I guess I would like a little clarification from the Council on how you would like me to address the parking with them? That is something you can think about and get back with me on. The next page in here from Commerce and Labor — this is a May and June 2006 issue in Sky Western Magazine that is focusing on Idaho. This is going to be reaching 1.5 million passengers. In addition, Commerce and Labor is going to be using this for promotional purposes. The Idaho inserts will be on the United Express flight on Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, and San Francisco all during the months of May and June. If you turn the page, this shows the map everywhere this is going and I would really like to put a Meridian ad in here. The one I did for Horizon, I would kind of like to shape — I thought about using that one for this one, but I would like to tweak the ad a little bit and there is a sample one in here that I would like to kind of put something like this together and talk more about Meridian. So, you can look that over when you have time and give me your feedback on that. De Weerd: When do you need to know by? Brown: I need to know as soon as possible before March 1St De Weerd: But how long will it take to (inaudible) the ad? Brown: One week. Actually I already sent this information off to Kristy who is (inaudible) the last design and (inaudible) and I am working on ideas for this. It was a go. I just think it gives Meridian a really good light out there and it's going to go and reach a lot of people all over the United States. Bird: What is the cost of —? Brown: It's all in there. Bird: I see it's on — Brown: The full page is $3,700 and half page is $2,500 and quarter page is $1,700. Bird: And what were you thinking of putting in Cheryl? Brown: I would really like to put half a page in there. Bird: How many people does that get to? Brown: 1.5 million passengers. Bird: That is pretty cheap for an ad. 0 Meridian City Council Special Meeting January 31, 2006 Page 7 of 15 Brown: I would love to partner with MDC on this and even get some of MDC's money to split the costs on this and do an ad for Meridian that we can both use for advertising. Bird: If you've got to have it by March 1st, I wouldn't worry about partnering with MDC. Wardle: Madame Mayor. De Weerd: Mr. Wardle. Wardle: If you get an expenditure that is certainly 5 million, Sky West is a major thorough fare for the business of traveling into the Boise region. If you got it in the budget I would say let's get the ad (inaudible). Brown: And United Express. Wardle: And United Express (inaudible)? Okay, if you need anybody to mouse that layout onto --? Brown: Okay. Bird: I would agree with that. Brown: You have got the map in there and the breakdown and the older layout (inaudible----------) it's very similar to what we did on the Horizon one. Bird: (Inaudible----) anything going on that you can't get on (inaudible --------------- --------------- ). Brown: Especially when it is going all across the United States (inaudible---). It's a targeted area. The next maps are the ones that I have been working with on COMPASS and I really like this one and what really helps sell Meridian is population circumference map because it is showing that no other city is going to be able to pull the population, pull the workforce that we can by them locating their business in Meridian. So, I really like this map. In fact, I have passed this one out to some of the realtors as well — the commercial realtors that are pitching Meridian. De Weerd: Cheryl, I don't know what the infringement or if there is infringement or what we need to do to work with the Idaho Statesman, but if we can put the headline that was on the front page of a week or two ago on something like this to really underscore that Meridian really is the center of the population in the Treasure Valley that would just be the frosting on the cake. 0 0 Meridian City Council Special Meeting January 31, 2006 Page 8 of 15 Brown: Okay. I am meeting with Frank tomorrow. He wants to do another square in the Valley Times and we will have him lead in with this. De Weerd: Well, no, I just thought that we could do an overlay where you have the Statesman title where we are the center of the population. Brown: Okay. Wardle: Cheryl, if you are going to use this to create a market piece, I think certainly that it shows that using the Statesman as a title line and also to me it looks a little bit like a bulls eye, so (inaudible) so it might be something to use in a (inaudible --------- ). Brown: The next map is where all the colleges and the higher education facilities where Universities are located, just showing that Meridian being central again. We have access to all of these higher learning institutions — (Inaudible discussion) Brown: And if anybody wants a copy I would be more than happy to make a copy of this for you. The next map is where all the tech companies are located in Meridian. An interesting thing that I was at the 2006 Economics Symposium in Boise all day today and what we have found out is there is a lot more home businesses and it's especially apparent in the tech deals. You can really tell by looking where these tech companies are. They are in subdivisions. So, these are our new upcoming emerging businesses that we can get out and get them into where we want to put them because they are growing. The next map is and these are all questions that I get when I have somebody looking at this area that isn't from Idaho that is from out of state. Where are all the airports? And they are not just wanting to know where the Boise airport is, they are wanting to know where they can fly their executive planes into, their private planes. So, this is a map of all of the airports and how far they are from Meridian and there is way more than I even knew. The next one and it only goes up to 2004 because we didn't have the 2005 numbers yet and Bruce has really helped me chart this as well. This is showing your commercial and your residential. It kind of gives you an idea on the bottom how big your residential is and your commercial, where you are manufacturing, personal land use, transitional farming, utilities on this type of graph. This goes from 2004 and I will have the 2005 done as soon as those numbers come out. The next graph will help kind of get you more into 2005, 2006 with the new commercial permit activity that Bruce has so kindly done and the single-family permit activity and I do have '06 on here where we are so far and here we are. We are up here already. Commercial permit activity. (Inaudible discussion) 0 0 Meridian City Council special Meeting January 31, 2006 Page 9of15 Brown: I do have a list that I got a Lee's that has come in for 2004, 2005 from Commerce and Labor and quite frankly I was disappointed in this because they are mostly food processing companies. They are really not — a lot of call centers, a lot of Spanish speaking call centers, (inaudible) call centers. I would like to market higher paying jobs — but, to figure out with going back to this with Meridian identifying where we want to grow and how we want to grow it. So, if there is any questions or not? De Weerd: Council, any questions? (Inaudible discussion) De Weerd: You do have a flow chart that will have an economic strategic plan to it of placing some action items. Councilman Wardle and I can go over some of the materials here so we can seek preferences of better tracking some progress and that sort of thing. As part of the flow chart and economic plan, a market strategy and some associated cost would be tied to that. So, that will also come back to you. As Cheryl has told you in the past, she has gotten funds through private partnerships and those are what are being allocated in a lot of the activities at this point. So, if there are no questions we appreciate your time Cheryl — Brown: Do you want me to talk about site visits? The Mayor and I have also been going out on site visits and meeting with some of the local businesses that are here and I am really trying to get them to stay here and grow here and get them the tools that they need as far as what the State offers in (inaudible) benefits and that type of thing. So, we are still going out and not just concentrating on new businesses, but we are still out there visiting the existing businesses in Meridian. De Weerd: And those are actions and very educational, exciting and it shows the voids and how it can better utilize partnerships with entities like (inaudible) and the MDC and what roles we each need to play and what we need to do well to eliminate (inaudible --------------- ). Yes, Dave? Zaremba: Madame Mayor, I just had a comment that perhaps you could talk to some of the major developers if they could — Winston Moore, David Turnbull, Ronald Van Auker and see if they might kick in enough to get a whole page ad in some of those because anything Meridian does benefits them. Those are the first three that I thought of. There are probably others. Brown: And there are. I am starting a list (inaudible ------------- ). De Weerd: Okay, thank you Cheryl. I would entertain a motion to adjourn. 0 40 Meridian City Council Special Meeting January 31, 2006 Page 10 of 15 Bird: Madame Mayor, I would move that we continue this to a City Council meeting. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: Okay, the motion is to continue the City Council Special Meeting at the end of our workshop agenda. All those in favor say aye. All those opposed? THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MOTION CARRIED. RECESSED AT 6:38 P.M. RECONVENE AT 8:49 P.M. Wardle: Okay, I move that we open the continued City Council meeting. Bird: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MOTION CARRIED. De Weerd: Let the record note that everyone is present that was earlier and Councilman Borton is still absent. I would entertain a motion to adjourn into Executive Session. Bird: Madame Mayor. De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we go into Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1) (C) and (F). Wardle: Second. De Weerd: Okay Mr. Berg will you call roll? Berg: Thank you Madame Mayor, members of the Council roll call vote. Bird, aye; Rountree, aye; Wardle, aye and Borton is absent. RECONVENE FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION Wardle: I move we go out of Executive Session. Bird: Second. Meridian City Council Special Meeting January 31, 2006 Page 11 of 15 De Weerd: All those in favor? THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MOTION CARRIED. De Weerd: Okay, do we adjourn? Bird: I know we had to — De Weerd: How about dates? Berg: How about the special meeting with the City of Kuna? On the 14th (inaudible) wanted them to meet at 5:00 and they called and said they could not meet at 5:00, they could meet at 4:00 or 3:30 or something to that nature just not to meet at 5:00. They also — De Weerd: Do they have a meeting that night? Berg: There is a problem. Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and for some reason they are attending that meeting (inaudible ------------------ ). They meet on the first and third Tuesday nights, so the 21St — another one of those things, they have a Council meeting at 7:00, so they said well we could meet, but we would have to be leaving close to 6:00 so we could be there in time for the other meeting (inaudible). I know you wanted to get this thing going fast. Wardle: Well, let's look at the 21 St Berg: The 28th is a free night for them, they don't have a meeting. Wardle: Did you say the 21St is out? Berg: That is a normal meeting for them and they would have to meet early. De Weerd: Could they meet at 5:00 and be out by 6:00? Bird: Tammy, we are not going to get that done in an hour, not if we do it right. Wardle: Okay well let's go to the 28tH Berg: The 28th and what time do you want? Wardle: If we can get done in an hour we can do it at 5:00. Bird: Okay, you and Joe and Charlie are the ones that determine the setup. You know Tammy and I are free. We can come any time. Meridian City Council Special Meeting January 31, 2006 Page 12 of 15 De Weerd: I am not free. Rountree: The 28th? Berg: We have a Council meeting at 7:00. Bird: We can set the Council meeting back. We could just start our Council meeting at 5:00 and go into Executive Session and come out (inaudible) unless you want to talk (inaudible----) with Kuna. Let's just start our Council meeting at 5:00. Wardle: Goodenough. The 28tH (Inaudible discussion) De Weerd: Okay, now Eagle would like to meet with us too and they are proposing a Wednesday. I think we should just (inaudible--------------) as well. don't know why — why did they think on Wednesday? Berg: I didn't — Wardle: Their Council meetings are on Tuesday as well. De Weerd: Every week? Berg: No, on the first, second and third. (Inaudible discussion) Rountree: So, what is the issue? (Inaudible ---------------) Canning: That area is still in their application to Ada County and (inaudible-----). (Inaudible discussion) Bird: Well, they are not — another thing, you know, we all — the Rural Fire District (inaudible ------------------- ). So in other words, anything that they take in Eagle, fire gets whether it's our fire district or not. De Weerd: I mean, there is a conflict of interest or not. Rountree: Well, if they (inaudible ------------------ ). Bird: They don't own that Fire District. That is a separate taxing entity. Rountree: So is ours. Meridian City Council Special Meeting January 31, 2006 Page 13 of 15 Bird: No it isn't. Wardle: They want to meet before March? (Inaudible discussion) Bird: When did Nancy want to meet? De Weerd: Nancy hasn't talked to me. You know, she has been very strange in that — Bird: Who told you that? De Weerd: She had a staff member — (Inaudible discussion) De Weerd: What did she say? Berg: Peggy told me that they wanted to meet on the 15th on a Wednesday. Wardle: Will and I will work on deciding either on the 21St at maybe a 5:00 or 5:30 or if they want to meet after the Commissioners. (Inaudible ----------------- ). Nary: That is what it sounds like to me. Sounds like they want to be able to go to the Commissioners saying we met with Meridian and this is what we agreed on. That is my take on that. They want to be able to say we agree to "x". (Inaudible ----------- ). Canning: I suspect they are looking — and this is purely speculation — De Weerd: They want your agreement that you won't annex outside of any lines that are drawn. They want that agreement before they go — that is my suspicion. (Inaudible discussion) Bird: Yeah, but that is only from Linder west. They are not going to give us the (inaudible----------- ) . De Weerd: No. No that would be only based on discussion that we already had with them and then they came back with those two issues of accepting that recommendation from staff and Mayor's based on additional conditions. Wardle: Let's do this. Will and I will get clarification on exactly what they would like to see. Meridian City Council Special Meeting • January 31, 2006 Page 14 of 15 De Weerd: Well and Shaun I know I am supposed to do that. She hasn't communicated that to me and Peggy was out last week. Shelly suggested that they call the Clerk's Office and give some dates. We called them back and left a message that we would call them back and get them possible dates. So, you guys can meet before they need to meet with the Commission. If you will get some possible dates, we will get their feedback back. We will get their feedback. (Inaudible discussion) Wardle: I am looking at maybe a noon meeting sometime. Something that — Bird: Problem is their Council President is in the legislature — (Inaudible discussion) De Weerd: Can you give us a couple of dates that work for you — both of you that work — (Inaudible discussion) De Weerd: Yeah, it says that Eagle wanted to meet Wednesday at 6:00, Wednesday the 15t" at 6:00. It looks like evening is better for them, but I don't know — (Inaudible discussion) Wardle: Okay, we will get — Rountree: Motion to adjourn? Wardle: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MOTION CARRIED. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:51 P.M. Meridian City Council Special Meeting • January 31, 2006 Page 15 of 15 (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVED: 2-/1-f/tv6 TAMMY rEERD, MAYOR DATE APPROVED i ` A s ATTESTED: WILLIAM G. BERG, A., C � RK Q ®a ���lre�iiet�a vvvN1\1°\ January 27, 2006 AZ 05-017 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 31, 2006 APPLICANT Tuscany Development, Inc. ITEM NO. 3-A REQUEST Tabled Development Agreement from January 24, 2006 — Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina Meadows Subdivision — South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS See c tcfched DA Phone: • ADA COUNTY RECORDEWAVID NAVARRO AMOUNT .00 55 BOISE IDAHO 02102/06 WPM DEPUTY Patti Thompson RECORDED—REQUEST OF 106017065 City of Meridian DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2: Harold Long & Teressa K. Long, Owners 3. Lynn B. Asay & Suzanne W. Asay, Owners 4. Tuscany Development, Inc., Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), is made and entered into this , #' day of , 2006, by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, her after called "CITY', and Harold & Teressa K. Long, and Lynn B. Asay & Suzanne W. Asay, hereinafter called "OWNERS" and Tuscany Development, Inc., hereinafter called "DEVELOPER". 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, "OWNERS" are the sole owners, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit A for each owner, which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the "Property''; and 1.2 WHEREAS, I.C. § 67-6511A, Idaho Code, provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of re -zoning that the "Owner" make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject "Property"; and 1.3 WHEREAS, "City" has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Ordinance 11-15-12 and 11-16-4 A, which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re -zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, "Owners" have submitted an application for annexation and zoning of the "Property's" described in Exhibit A, and has requested a designation of R-8 Medium Density Residential, (Municipal Code of the City of Meridian); and 1.5 WHEREAS, "Owners" made representations at the public hearings both before the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission and before the Meridian City Council, as to how the subject "Property" will be developed and what improvements will be made; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) PAGE 1 OF 14 • 0 1.6 WHEREAS, record of the proceedings for the requested annexation and zoning designation of the subject "Property" held before the Planning & Zoning Commission, and subsequently before the City Council, include responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and received further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS, City Council, the 12a' day of July, 2005, has approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order, set forth in Exhibit B, which are attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, hereinafter referred to as (the "Findings"); and 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the "Owners and Developer" to enter into a development agreement before the City Council takes final action on annexation and zoning designation; and 1.9 "OWNER" deems it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and requests; and 1.10 WHEREAS, "City" requires the "Owners and Developer" to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the "Property" is developed and the subsequent use of the "Property" is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this development agreement, herein being established as a result of evidence received by the "City" in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure re- zoning designation is in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382, and the Zoning and Development Ordinances codified in Meridian City Code Title 11 and Title 12. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) PAGE 2 OF 14 0 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for, unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 "CITY": means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal Corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 "OWNER": means and refers to Harold R. Long and Teressa K. Long, husband and wife, whose address is 2636 E. Amity Road, Meridian, Idaho 83642, Lynn B. Asay and Suzanne W. Asay, husband and wife, whose address is 4651 S. Asay Lane, Meridian, Idaho 83642, the parties developing said "Property" and shall include any subsequent developer(s) of the "Property". 3.3 "DEVELOPER": means and refers to Tuscany Development, Inc., whose address is PO Box 344, Meridian, Idaho 83642, the party developing said "Property" and shall include any subsequent developer(s) of the "Property". 3.4 "PROPERTY": means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of "Property" located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as described in Exhibit A describing the parcels to be annexed and zoned R-8 (Medium Density) attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under "City's" Zoning Ordinance codified at Meridian City Code Section 11 7-2 (D) which are herein specified as follows: Construction and development of either a conditional use permit or a planned development application shall be submitted to the City of Meridian prior to a future development in the R-8 zone, and the pertinent provisions of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan are applicable to this AZ 05-017 application. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) PAGE 3 OF 14 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. DEVELOPMENT IN CONDITIONAL USE: "Developer" has submitted to "City" an application for conditional use permit site plan dated April 4, 2005, and shall be required to obtain the "City"' approval thereof, in accordance to the City's Zoning and Development Ordinance criteria, therein, provided, prior to, and as a condition of, the commencement of construction of any buildings or improvements on the "Property" that require a conditional use permit. 6. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 6.1. "Developer" shall develop the "Property" in accordance with the following special conditions: 1. That the developer will be responsible for all costs associated with the sewer and water service extension. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services are available from the City of Meridian. Wells maybe used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 2. That all future development of the subject property shall be constructed in accordance with City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. All future uses shall not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. 3. That development of Phases 1 and 4 located within a floodplain shall not commence until FEMA approves the proposed Letter of Map Revision and the flood designation has been revised for Ten -Mile Creek. If the flood plain and floodway boundaries presented with this application are not approved by FEMA, the developer shall have two options: 1) remove any lots within the FEMA -approved floodplain boundaries or 2) resubmit for preliminary plat approval of Phases 1 and 4. 4. The developer shall construct multi -use pathways as required by the Comprehensive Plan and presented on the preliminary plat dated DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) PAGE 4 OF 14 0 March 14, 2005. The future crossings of Ten Mile Creek and Ridenbaugh Canal may be accomplished through bridges (Davinci Way stub street) connecting future development with Tuscany Lakes and Messina Hills Subdivision. 5. PARK — Pursuant to the direction of the City Council, the applicant met with the Parks and Recreation Commission regarding the possible dedication of Lot 21 Block 1 to the City for a public park. Despite a positive recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Commission, the City Council has not taken action to approve the City's acceptance of Lot 21 Block 1 as a public park. Accordingly, the applicant may proceed to submit the final plat which shall depict Lot 21 Block 1 as open space/common area to be owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. In the event that applicant and City reach agreement at some time in the future regarding dedication of Lot 21 Block 1 as a publicly owned and maintained park, the dedication can be accomplished by a separate written agreement and amended final plat. 6. S. BURGO AVENUE — The developer shall connect, as a public street, the S. Burgo Way stub street in Messina Village Subdivision No. 2, with the proposed S. Burgo Avenue through the subject property. The applicant shall coordinate with the United States Bureau of Reclamation and the Ada County Highway District on the extension of said public street connection and crossing of Parcel No. 51129142220. 7. COMPLIANCE PERIOD/CONSENT TO REZONE: This Agreement and the commitments contained herein shall be terminated, and the zoning designation reversed, upon a default of the "Owner" or "Owners" heirs, successors, assigns, to comply with Section 6 entitled "Conditions Governing Development of Subject Property" of this agreement within two years of the date this Agreement is effective, and after the "City" has complied with the notice and hearing procedures as outlined in Idaho Code § 67-6509, or any subsequent amendments or recodifications thereof. 8. CONSENT TO DE -ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: "Owner/Developer" consents upon default to the reversal of the zoning designation of the "Property" subject to and conditioned upon the following conditions precedent to -wit: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) PAGE 5 OF 14 0 8.1 That the "City" provide written notice of any failure to comply with this Agreement to "Owner" and if the "Owner" fails to cure such failure within six (6) months of such notice. 9. INSPECTION: "Owners/Developer" shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the "Property" as required by this agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement and all other ordinances of the "City" that apply to said Development. 10. DEFAULT: 10.1 In the event "Owners/Developer", "Owners/Developer's" heirs, successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the "Property" or any other person acquiring an interest in the "Property", fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the "Property", this Agreement maybe modified or terminated by the "City" upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 10.2 A waiver by "City" of any default by "Owners" of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the breach and breaches waived and shall not bar any other rights or remedies of "City" or apply to any subsequent breach of any such or other covenants and conditions. 11. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: `City" shall record either a memorandum of this Agreement or this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, at "Owner's" cost, and submit proof of such recording to "Owners", prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the re -zoning of the "Property" by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the "Property" contemplated hereby, the "City" shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 12. ZONING: "City" shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the "Property" as specified herein. 13. REMEDIES: This Agreement shall be enforceable in any court of competent jurisdiction by either "City" or "Owners", or by any successor or successors in title or by the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) PAGE 6 OF 14 0 0 assigns of the parties hereto. Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the specific performance of the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein. 13.1 In the event of a material breach of this Agreement, the parties agree that "City" and "Owner" shall have thirty (3 0) days after delivery of notice of said breach to correct the same prior to the non -breaching party's seeking of any remedy provided for herein; provided, however, that in the case of any such default which cannot with diligence be cured within such thirty (3 0) day period, if the defaulting party shall commence to cure the same within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter shall prosecute the curing of same with diligence and continuity, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 13.2 In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either "Owners" or "City" is delayed for causes which are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 14. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The "City" may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under Meridian City Code § 12-5-3, to insure that installation of the improvements, which the "Owners" agrees to provide, if required by the "City". 15. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: The "Owners" agree that no Certificates of Occupancy will be issued until all improvements are completed, unless the "City" and "Owners" have entered into an addendum agreement stating when the improvements will be completed in a phased developed; and in any event, no Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed, completed, and accepted by the "City". 16. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That "Owners" agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian and the "Property" shall be subject to de -annexation if the owner or his assigns, heirs, or successors shall not meet the conditions contained in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, this Development Agreement, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) PAGE 7 OF 14 17. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: c/o City Engineer City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 with copy to: City Clerk City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 OWNERS: Lynn B. Asay and Suzanne W. Asay 4651 South Asay Lane Meridian, Idaho 83642 DEVELOPER: Tuscany Development PO Box 344 Meridian, ID 83680 Harold R. Long and Teressa K. Long 2636 East Amity Road Meridian, Idaho 83642 17.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 18. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 19. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) PAGE 8 OF 14 provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 20. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including "City's" corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the "Owner" of the "Property", each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the "Property". Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the "Property", or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. "City" agrees, upon written request of "Owner", to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if "City", in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that "Owner" has fully performed its obligations under this Agreement. 21. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 22. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between "Owner" and "City" relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between "Owner" and "City", other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to "City", to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of "City". 22.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing re -zoning of the subject "Property" herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the "City" has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 23. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective on the date the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) PAGE 9 OF 14 Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the "Property" and execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) PAGE 10 OF 14 0 0 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. DEVELOPER: OWNERS: Lynn B. Asay 10�R uzaniie,W. Asay • • • /oezTe/essa K. Long— CITY OF MERIDIAN `�®*,®��aa1R19d181t J®� p4 Attest: C CLERK Q 165r 61t7 1-31—tvill; DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Wag TA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION PAGE 11 OF 14 0 0 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss: County of Ada, ) On thisgeday of , 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personall peared GREG JOHNSON, known or identified to me to be the President of Tuscany Development, the corporation that executed this agreement and the person who executed the agreement on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day,udlet�•,iip,this certificate first above writtP„ •�`• s' Y S C 1<0 Sf A �CiTA ', S • r Z rt�o �+V B L1'r- i a b STATS `) aersouene ss COUNTY OF ADA rls� SCS! GL Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: —'-a0y� �' My Commission pires. On this fh day of in the year 2006, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared LYNN E. MAY known or identified to me to be the person who executed the instrument and acknowledged to me that he have executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. it 1SeS.•• See®1'd�a�®sig. .`o'rA� J,Q�'.' •� Notary Publi for Idaho • = Residing at: �{ '0 • S Commission expi es: /! q "liBLIG ; tP�% e•• •s° ��•�°�� OF IU �;p••• DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) PAGE 12 OF 14 0 • STATE OF IDAHO ) M COUNTY OF ADA On this a? 7"7 day of ,/t / , in the year 2006, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared SUZANNEW. ASAY known or identified to me to be the person who executed the instrument and acknowledged to me that he have executed the same. trF,;.. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my 104 the- ay and year in this certificate first above written. �OT/b Co vW ®$tea N t P f ° �UBLTa' e°eseee°°® F •.., OF I `®d• STATE 6P'"�i IM : ss COUNTY OF ADA o ary u 1c or Idaho Residing at;C 0 Oh Commission exp •es: On this ol, 7t` day of Jaw in the year 2006, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared HAROLD LONG known or identified to me to be the person who executed the instrument and acknowledged to me that he have executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. 0Gid°s ®is•11. Notary Pub 1c for Idaho ® = Residing at: 11 PUBLIC' o Commission expir ems__ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) PAGE 13 OF 14 STATE OF IDAHO ) : ss COUNTY OF ADA ) On this pf 1 day of J444C. in the year 2006, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared TERESSA K. ONG known or identified to me to be the person who executed the instrument and acknowledged to me that he have executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official se g o%d year in this certificate first above written. Sao 1) Iw ®e° 3 e' (SE L) ®°® S s Notary P is for Idaho /a,� , 40U �'X0 o°� Residing at: Go'"Or C iI F' F I. Commission expires: I. pg6�3� STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On thisP i� day of n 1I y , _ 2006, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and Willi G. Berg, Jr., know or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. �®ryr•rrrl• (SEAL): Notary Public fyr Idaho Residing at: ®i Commission expires: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) PAGE 14 OF 14 • 0 REVISED DESCRIPTION CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXATION MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION January 13, 2006 A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED 1N THE S 112 AND THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 29, T.3N., R.1 E., B.M., THENCE N 89°37'43" W 25.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SE 1/4 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF S. EAGLE ROAD, THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION; THENCE S 00037'09"W 1321.32 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NE 114 OF SAID SE 1/4; THENCE N 89°39'50" W 1307.62 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SW 1/4 OF SAID SE 1/4; THENCE S 0002623"W 1297.78 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SAID SE 1/4 TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF E. AMITY ROAD; THENCE N 89`4343" W 388.82 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY TO A POINT; THENCE N 00°50'13" E 473.19 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 89'5046" W 274.51 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 00'26'33" W 382.63 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, ALSO BEING THE CENTERLINE OF THE TEN MILE DRAIN; ALONG SAID CENTERLINE AS FOLLOWS: THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT 405.41 FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1071.91 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21°40'13", TANGENTS OF 205.16 FEET, AND CHORD WHICH BEARS N 4103(Y24" W 403.00 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE N 52020'29" W 503.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SAID SE 1/4 (CENTER OF SECTION LINE); THENCE S 00'15'10" W 4.23 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO A POINT; THENCE N 5201630" W 254.23 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE N 5203(r30" W 64.7.61 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 33026'30"W 49.85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 29; 1110,FX-1)kS,I-)0(' 0 • LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE: THENCE N 00003'53!'E 80.47 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST 112 OF THE SE % OF SAID SW 114; THENCE CONTINUING N 00003'53° E 1323.69 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE E 112 OF THE NE 114 OF SAID SW 114; THENCE S 8903909" E 669.97 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE E 112 OF THE NE 114 OF SAID SW 114 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SW 114 (C114 CORNER); THENCE S 8903743" E 1336.57 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NW 114 OF THE SE'/ OF SAID SECTION 29 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NW 114 OF SAID SE 114 (CE 1116 CORNER); THENCE N 00°21'39" E 60.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF MESSINA VILLAGE SUBDIVISION No.2, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 89 OF PLATS, PAGES 10280 TO 10281, ADA COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE; THENCE S 8903T43" E 1311.68 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF MESSINA VILLAGE SUBDIVISION No.1, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 86 OF PLATS, PAGES 9758 TO 9759 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF S. EAGLE ROAD; THENCE S 0002745" W 60.00 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 137.96 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 0 NL LA WAYNE K. BARBER, P.L.S. 8444 A4,40 ID ? 1110-;\NNFX-(7 !',s,1)( -)C • 154 0 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND In the batter of a Bequest for Annexation and. Zoning of 136.72 Acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-8 (Medium Density ResidentialAND Preliminary PIat Approval of Four - Hundred -Ninety -One (491) Single- Family Building Lots, Sixty -Seven (67) Other/Common Lots, and One (1) Park Lot AND Conditional Use Permit Approval for a Planned Development Consisting of Single -Family Homes and a Public Park with Reduced Minimum Lot Frontages and Reduced Minimum Lot Sizes, by Tuscany Development, Inc. Case No(s): AZ -05-017, PP -05-019, CUP -05-026 For the City Council Hearing Date of: July 26, 2005 A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts a. A notice of a public hearing was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the City Council public hearing, the first publication appearing and written notice mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property. The notice of public hearing before the City Council was posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing. All other noticing was done consistent with Idaho Code §67- 6509. The matter was duly considered by the City Council at the July 12, 2005 and July 26, 2005, public hearing(s). The applicant, affected property, owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian were given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. b. Written and oral testimony was received on this matter, as reflected in the records of the City Clerk (for written testimony) and in the official meeting minutes (for oral testimony). C. The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and issued a written recommendation on the subject matter to the City Council. d. The City Council heard and took oral and written testimony and duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter. 2. Process Facts a. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code §67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as CfTY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ -05-017 / PP -05-019 / CUP -05-026- PAGE 1 of 5 0 evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof of Posting filed with the staff report. 3. Application and Property Facts a. In addition to the application and property facts noted in the staff report and the Planning & Zoning Recommendation for the subject application(s), it is hereby verified that the property owner(s) of record at the time of issuance of these findings are Harold R. Long, Lynn B. Assay, Eliza Anne Henry, Paul Warrick, and Tuscany Development, INC. 4. Required Findings per Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance a. See Exhibits G, H, and I for the findings required for these applications. B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67- 6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and Development Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-17-9. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Legal Description in Exhibit A, the Preliminary Plat dated March 14, 2005 as shown in Exhibit B, the Site Plan as shown in Exhibit C, the Annexation and Zoning Comments as shown in Exhibit D, the Preliminary Plat Site Specific and Standard Conditions as shown in Exhibit E, and the CUP/PD Site Specific and Standard Conditions as shown in Exhibit F. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ -05-017 / PP -05-019 / CUP -05-026- PAGE 2 of 5 C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 12-3-5 and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's Preliminary Plat as evidenced by having submitted the Preliminary Plat dated March 14, 2005 is hereby conditionally approved; 2. The applicant's Site Plan as evidenced by having submitted the Site Plan shown in Exhibit C is hereby conditionally approved; and, 3. The Site Specific and Standard Conditions are as shown in Exhibits E and F. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits 1. Notice of Eighteen (18) Month Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit shall be valid for a maximum period of eighteen (18) months unless otherwise approved by the council. During this time, the permit holder must commence the use as permitted in accordance with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. In this context "structures" shall include sewer and water lines, streets or building construction. The applicant has specified in the application and to the commission and council a construction schedule and completion date for the project. If the completion date specified for the project is exceeded, the conditional use application shall become null and void. However, the applicant may submit an application for a time extension on the project for city council review. The application for time extension shall be submitted at least thirty (30) days prior to the deadline for completion of the project. For projects requiring platting, the final plat must be recorded within this eighteen (18) month period. For projects with multiple phases, the eighteen (18) month deadline shall apply to the first phase. In the event that the development is made in successive contiguous segments or multiple phases, such phases shall be constructed within successive intervals of one year from the original date of approval by the council. If the successive phases are not submitted within one year intervals, the conditional approval of the future phases shall be null and void. (MCC 11-17-4.B.) 2. Notice of Twelve (12) Month Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that after the date of approval of the preliminary plat, the owner or developer shall have one year within which to file the request for approval of the final plat. After approval of final plat, the owner or developer shall have one year to begin construction of the public utilities and one year thereafter to complete construction of those public facilities. (MCC 12-2-4.B & C.) E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO($). AZ -OS -017 / PP -05-019 / CUP -05-026- PAGE 3 of 5 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision ' concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the conditional use permit approval may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Exhibits Exhibit A: Legal Description Exhibit B: Approved Preliminary Plat (with conditions) Exhibit C: Approved Site Plan (with conditions) Exhibit D: Annexation and Zoning Comments Exhibit E: Preliminary Plat Site Specific and Standard Conditions Exhibit F: CUP/PD Site Specific and Standard Conditions Exhibit G: Zoning Amendment Findings Exhibit H: Preliminary Plat Findings Exhibit I: CUP/PD Findings By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the (.,4i^— day of 2005. c COUNCIL MEMBER SHAUN WARDLE VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTINE DONNELL VOTED_ COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD VOTED_40 MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED D� CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ -05-017 / PP -05-019 / CUP -05-026- PAGE 4 of 5 0 (TIE BREAKER) • Attest: ,��`;�4 O) illiam G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk r pe.. �0c� Copy served. upon Applicant, The Plannifxg. �c> ngSepartment, Public Works Department and City Attorney. B Dated: City Clerk CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ -05-017 / PP -05-014 / CUP -05-026- PAGE 5 of 5 0 Messina Meadows Subdivision AZ -05-017 Legal Description (2 pages) DESICRIPTION FOR MESSINA WADOWS SUBDIVISION 0 0.�hRi EL `iF LAWD LOCATED IN THE 5 1; C;= S7CT1C)N '?�. AND ALL OF LOT 2.3LOvl; :iF DP'OPOS= D MES$INA HIL_S SURDI'd:S 0411`10.= LYING IN TC)WNSHI:3NO= T H, RANGE 1 EAS_ OF THE BOISE MirRIDiAN, N1ERIaWN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, SEIM3 MORE PARTICI;;-H?:.Y DESCRIBED AS FOLI,OV,'S: COMfAE-N ING ;,- THE NORTHEAST CORNER TrfE SE 114 OF SECTION 29, T.3N., R 1E. G M.. THENCE N 89'37'42" tri 25 0G FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SE 1;4 T O F POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF S. EAGLE ROAD, THE f g POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS SUBDIVISION; THENCE S 00'37'1.0" UU :2 232 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NE 1;a OF SAID SE 1f;. THENCE N eb"'sP'50" W 1307 62 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SW 1:4 OF SAID SE '.14, THENCE S 02-26'2-,3' VV 1297.78 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SW 114 OF SAID SE 1/4 TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF E. AMITY ROAD; THENCEE N AtP4343" W 335.07 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY TO A POINT. THENCE N' K1"26':3" E 475.00 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE N 8 `43'43" iN 261.00 FEET TO A POINT: THENCE S 00'26'32" A' 385.03 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, ALSO BEING THE CENTERLINE C;F THE TEN MILE DRAIN: ALONG SAID CENTERLINE AS FOLLOWS THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT 405 41 FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1071.91, FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21'40'13''. TANGENTS OF 205.16 FEET, AND CHORD Vv'HIGH BEAMS N 41'30'24" 1~P 403.00 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY: ]exhibit A — Messina Meadows 0 0 r "!. . I AL' I D E- T L tJ= TO T N 0 R T ri 6N' E S T C 0 -R'! 4 --- F, Cl F 7-: T I Cj F T -i F: SE T H F N C E C Cc! !7 L; I t -iG 14:'C.'3'53" E 132'-.6's FELT TCD THE N 0 F% T HViE S" C, 0 R N ---- R OF THE E I *-'-' OF -,I=- OF SAID HEN.* L- S &t: - ' I C-�E 3, �'5.87, ::EF=T ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE E 1,`2 OF THE NE SAl".1". S'A, ',.*-- TO THE LOT 2, BLOCK 11 OF KI;ESSIhJA - L -S SUBDIVISION NO 2; ALONG THE OF 8AID LOT , THE FOLLOkVING THENCE N 6r;43*4E," E 31 70 FEET TOA POINT. I THENCE AL(')NG A CURVE TO THE LEFT 250.52 =-ET, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1250.00 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11'56'29", TANGENTS OF 130.73 PErml', AND CHORD HEARS N 54'45*33" I= 260.05 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT 54.17 FEET. SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 126.00 FEET, A CFNTRA-, ANGLE OF 24'37'5E". TANGENTS OF 27.51 FEET, AND CHORD WHICH BEARS S 56'12'0311 E; 53.75 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S G� 'lE'20"VV '37.46 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SW 114 (0114 CORNEP0. LEAVING TH-::: BOLINDARY OF SAID LOT 2: ' THENCE S EP"37'43" E 2646,14 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SE 11AOF SAID SECTION 2n TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS SUBDIVISION. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 136.72 ACRES. MORE OR LESS, Npl LAA COP WAYNE K. BARBER,, " 4 P.L-S. 8444 a.r 14 Exhibit A — Messina Meadows 0 EXHIBIT B Messina Meadows Subdivision PP -05-019 Approved Preliminary Plat 0 0 EX141BIT C Messina Meadows Subdivision CUP -05-026 Approved Site Plan CITY 0 I j t L --H PARK j '' ' ' - '� 1 M1_ ' ' � "M T N; tib'7 LE .1. MEADOWS GoO hr Ei X., C -D Li AMITY ROAD P, It L Messina Meadows Subdivision AZ -05-017 Annexation and Zoning Comments ANEXATI®N & ZONING COMTvIENTS 1. The annexation legal description submitted with the application (stamped by Wayne K. Barber, PLS) shows the property as contiguous to the existing corporate boundary of the City of Meridian. 2. Any future subdivision, uses and construction on this property shall comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time. 3. A Development Agreement (DA) will be required as part of an annexation of this property. Prior to the annexation ordinance approval, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) (at the time of annexation ordinance adoption), and the developer. The applicant Shall contact the City Attoxnev Bill Nary, at 888-4433 to initiate this process The DA shall incorporate the following: That the applicant will be responsible for all costs associated with the sewer and water service extension. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services are available from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. That all future development of the subject property shall be constructed in accordance with City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. All future uses shall not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. That development of Phases 1 and 4 located within a floodplain shall not commence until FEMA approves the proposed Letter of Map Revision and the flood designation has been revised for Ten -Mile Creek. If the flood plain and floodway boundaries presented with this application are not approved by FEMA, the applicant shall have two options: 1) remove any lots within the FEMA - approved floodplain boundaries or 2) resubmit for preliminary plat approval of Phases 1 and 4. The developer shall construct multi -use pathways as required by the Comprehensive Plan and presented on the preliminary plat Dated March 14, 2005. The future crossings of Ten Mile Creek and the Ridenbaugh Canal may be accomplished through bridges (Davinci Way stub street) connecting future development with Tuscany Lakes and Messina Hills Subdivision. Park - The applicant agrees to dedicate We Publ: D 1 t tl, Cit f Meridian. Yt,...v..u� ubawo �,...vzi.. Exhibit D Messina Meadows 0 0 The park shall elear- title must be r-F-Wid8d ts the City AMfn" fef rev ew prior to t fir dia r „l,.,no b ""``" ,,,.^,;'�o,-r , Pursuant to the direction of the City Council, the applicant met with the Parks and Recreation Commission regarding the possible dedication of Lot 21 Block I to the City for a public park. Despite a positive recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Commission, the City Council has not taken action to approve the City's acceptance of Lot 21 Block 1 as a public park. Accordingly, the applicant may proceed to submit the final plat which shall depict Lot 21 Block 1 as open space%ommon area to be owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. In the event that applicant and City reach agreement at some time in the future regarding dedication of Lot 21 Block 1 as a publicly owned and maintained park, the dedication can be accomplished by a separate written agreement and amended final plat. Exhibit D Messina Meadows 0 EXIMIT Messina Meadows Subdivision PP -05-019 Preliminary Plat Site Specific and Standard Conditions SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS—PRELE—M-01NARY PLAT 1. The preliminary plat prepared by Briggs Engineering, Inc, dated Mar 14, 2005, is approved, with the conditions listed herein. All comments/conditions of the accompanying Annexation/Zoning (AZ -05-017) and Conditional Use Permit (CUP -05-026) and Development Agreement shall also be considered conditions of the Preliminary Plat (PP -05-019). 2. In lieu of strict adherence to multi -pathway locations, the applicant may propose an alternative multi -use pathway system in compliance to the 2002 Future Land Use Map if approved by the Meridian Parks Department. 3. Place a note on the face of the final plat stating that all future front garage setbacks shall be 20 -feet as measured from the property line or the back of sidewalk, whichever is more restrictive. Exceptions to this requirement would be the lots contained by Blocks 22 and 23. 4. Prior to the City Engineer's signature of a final plat containing all structures not contained on a designated lot shall be removed. 5. The submitted landscape plan prepared by The Land Group, Inc., dated 2-15-05 is approved as submitted with changes. The following should be included in a revised landscape plan: + Depict and construct a 10 -foot wide gravel shoulder on Amity Road abutting the site, with the remaining portion of the right-of-way being landscaped with lawn or other vegetative groundcover. + All micropaths within the proposed subdivision shall be designed in accordance with MCC 12-13-15 "Micropath Landscaping" and MCC 12-4-3 "Pedestrian Walkways." Micropath fencing shall be constructed per MCC 12- 13-15-9. + All areas being counted toward the open space requirement shall be free of "wet ponds" or other such nuisances. All stormwater detention facilities incorporated into the required open space are subject to Ordinance 12-13-14 and shall be fully vegetated with grass and trees, as depicted on the submitted landscape plan. + Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that are removed. Exhibit E —Messina Meadows l.J Other than the changes listed above, the approved landscape plan is not to be altered without prior written approval of the Planning & Zoning Department. 6. Construct a micro -path as depicted on the Preliminary plat March 15, 2005 and drawn by Briggs Engineering, Inc. Appropriate signage should be included in the micropath as to direct pedestrian traffic to the appropriate trail system. 7. All road drainage shall be contained on site in the roadside swales as depicted. No trees shall be placed in such a manner as to interfere with drainage. 8. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per MCC 124-13, unless otherwise approved by Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non -approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can not be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to final plat signature. 9. The applicant has not indicated who will own and operate the pressurized irrigation system within this development. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all lots within this development. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to remain a private homeowners' association system, complete plans and specifications shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan review process. A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual shall be submitted prior to plan approval. The applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 10. A detailed fencing plan shall be submitted upon application of the final plat. Fencing along all canals and waterways shall be a minimum of 6' in height and constructed of non-combustible materials as to not interfere with regular maintenance of ditches and waterways by Nampa Meridian Irrigation District. If permanent fencing is not provided, temporary construction fencing to contain debris must be installed around the perimeter prior to issuance of building permits. All fences shall taper down to 3 -feet maximum within 20 feet of all right- of-way. All fencing shall be installed in accordance with MCC 12-4-10. Exhibit E —Messina Meadows 0 • 11. Maintenance of all common areas shall be the responsibility of the Messina Meadows Homeowners' Association. 12. Staff is concerned about the potential effects of high groundwater in the proposed project area. Two significant waterways affect this property: the Ridenbaugh Canal along the entire northern boundary and Ten Mile Creek intersecting the project. Conventional wisdom holds that the shallow ground water table recedes once development occurs and agricultural irrigation ceases and waterways are tiled. However, every year a number of homeowners contact the Public Works Department regarding water in their crawl spaces in developments that have been completely built out. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the highest established seasonal high groundwater elevation. 13. The approval of this proposed development shall be conditional on the applicant being able to obtain a letter of map revision from FEMA for the proposed modified flood plain boundaries or redesign the development to comply with Meridian City Code 10-6-5 regarding Provisions for Flood Hazard Reduction. 14. Due to relatively high existing groundwater levels, applicant shall submit a Master Grading and Drainage plan as part of the development plans to be submitted with each phase of this development. The Master Grading and Drainage plan shall include at a minimum the following: a. Groundwater contours for this development at peak seasonal high depth. b. Finish floor elevation for all houses in this development. c. Elevation of crawl space for all houses in this development. d. Finish grade elevation at each lot comer. e. Drainage flow patterns on all lots. f. Applicant shall maintain a minimum of five ground water monitoring wells in project, at locations approved by the Public Works Department. Applicant shall continue monthly ground water monitoring for two years after final approval of each phase and provide information to the Public Works Department. g. If structural fill is to be placed on any lot, material specifications and compaction requirements shall be detailed and submitted to Public Works and the Building Department. h. If slab -on -grade construction is utilized in conjunction with typical footings, builders of each lot shall comply with all requirements contained in the International Building Code regarding slab on grade construction. The builder of each lot shall provide fill material gradation certification and a minimum of one compaction testing report per 500 square feet of Exhibit E —Messina Meadows first floor area (including garage) and provide such reports to the Meridian Building Department prior to commencement of any framing. L The Master Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Public Works Department prior to overall plan approval. Builders must provide finish floor and crawl space elevation certification for each house prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. 15. All residential construction, where foundations would be within soil Groups II through IV of the Unified Soils Classification System, shall comply with the International Residential Code R405.1, pertaining to the requirement of drains around all concrete foundations that retain earth and enclose habitable or usable spaces located below grade. Approved drainage systems shall be installed at or below the area to be protected and shall discharge by gravity or mechanical means to an approved drainage system. The applicant shall provide Public Works and the Building Department with detailed soil classification profile of each test hole as determined by Associated Earth Sciences Incorporated. 16. Sanitary sewer service to the western and southern phases of the development shall be via the future main located along Ten -Mile Creek, through Tuscany Subdivision and piped under the Ridenbaugh Canal, and the northeastern portion shall connect to Messina Village Subdivision. The Subdivision designer is to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department to be in accordance with the approved master sewer plan. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains that are required to provide service. 17. Municipal water to this site shall be via extensions from existing mains in the Tuscany Development from the north. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to and through this proposed development, thereby making them available to adjacent properties. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains that are required to provide service. 18. Other than the public street accesses approved by ACRD, direct lot access to Eagle Road and Amity Road are prohibited. A note shall be placed on the final plat restricting access to these roads. I9. All private streets as shown on the plat shall be a minimum width of 24 feet of improved surface as agreed upon by the letter dated May 25, 2005 GENERAL. REQUIREMENTS—PRELEMEINARY PLAT 1. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. Exhibit E Messina Meadows 0 0 2. Sidewalks shall be installed within the subdivision and on the perimeter of the subdivision pursuant to MCC 12-13-10-8. 3. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 4. A detailed landscape plan, in compliance with the landscape and subdivision ordinance and as noted in this report, shall be submitted for the subdivision with the final plat application. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 6. Two -hundred -fifty and ane -hundred -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. i. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to be mitigated. 8. Submit any up -dated groundwater/soils monitoring data, as collected and analyzed by a soils scientist, to the Public Works Department for review. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water will percolate or discharge with a period of time not to exceed 24 -hours for all storms up to and including a 100 -year storm events. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3:1. Any portion of a drainage area not improved with sod/grass seed (or other approved landscaping) shall not count towards the required open space area. The project engineer should pay close attention to the results of field studies determining the groundwater, soil type & and characteristics during the design and construction phases. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3 -feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1 -foot above peak high groundwater. 9. The applicant shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. Exhibit E —Messina Meadows 0 • 10. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 11. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 12. The applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374. 13. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved annexation/conditional use does not relieve the applicant of responsibility for compliance. 14. Preliminary plat approval shall be subject to the expiration provisions set forth in MCC 12-2-4. OTHER AGENCY/DEPARTMENT COMMENTS & CONDITIONS MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. One and two family dwellings will require a fire -flow of 1,000 gallons per minute available for duration of 2 hours to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 500' apart. International Fire Code Appendix C 2. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Fire Department and water quality by the Meridian Water Department for bacteria testing. 3. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department. a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 %z" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle. b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it. c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works spec. d. Locations with fire hydrants shall have the curb painted red 10' to each side of the hydrant location. e. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on comers when spacing permits. f. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'. g. Fire hydrants shall be place 18" above finish grade. h. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements of the IFC Section 509.5. Exhibit E —Messina Meadows 0 0 4. The phasing plan may require that any roadway greater than 150' in length that is not provided with an outlet shall be required to have an approved turn around. 5. All entrance and internal roads shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside radius. 6. All common driveways shall be straight or have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside and shall have a clear driving surface which is 20' wide. 7. Provide a 20' wide Fire Lane for all internal roadways all roadways shall be marked in accordance with Appendix D Section 17103.6 Signs. 8. Insure that all yet undeveloped parcels are maintained free of combustible vegetation. 9. Fire lanes and streets shall have a vertical clearance of 13'6". This includes mature landscaping. 10. Operational fire hydrants, temporary or permanent street signs and access roads with an all weather surface are required before combustible construction is brought on site. 11. To increase emergency access to the site a minimum of two points of access will be required for any portion of the project, which serves more than 50 homes. The applicant shall provide a stub street to the property to the (west/east/south). The two entrances should be separated by no less than %i the diagonal measurement of the full development. 12. Building setbacks shall be per the International Building Code for one and two story construction. 13. The roadways shall be built to Ada County Highway Standards cross section requirements and shall have a clear driving surface, available at all times, which is 20' wide. Streets with less than a 29' street width shall have no parking. Streets with less than 33' shall have parking only on one side. These measurements shall be based on the face of curb dimension. 14. The proposed 491 -lot subdivision with an estimated 2.9 residents per household would have a total estimated population of 1423.9 residents at build out. 15. The proposed project lies outside the five-minute response zone goal. Achievement of this goal is subject to budgetary constraints and is intended to enhance the probability of a favorable outcome on a request for Basic Life Support. The budget constraints are typically defined as capital outlay for Exhibit E —Messina Meadows • 0 facilities that are located within 1.5 miles from a given location and sufficient operational funds to staff the facilities. 16. The fire department requests that any future signalization installed as the result of the development of this project be equipped with Opticom Sensors to ensure a safe and efficient response by fire and emergency medical service vehicles. This cost of this installation is to be borne by the developer 17. All portions of the buildings located on this project must be within 150' of a paved surface as measured around the perimeter of the building. 18. Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet (122 m) from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the code official. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183). a. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m). b. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m). MERIDIAN PARKS DEPARTMENT 1. Pathway and Trail standards: The proposed pathway and/or trail shall meet the standards as set forth in the August 2003 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation System Plan, pgs. 3-2 and 3-3, sections B & C. The pathway should connect through to Bellingham park subdivision. If Bellingham Park Subdivision fails to be approved the applicant shall provide on street connection from Lot 16 Block 16 to the Ten Mile Creek until such a time as an extension is possible. 2. Standard for City to assume Maintenance of a section of Pathway: The pathway must connect from one major arterial to another, and either an easement or ownership deed must be granted before the city will assume the maintenance of any section of pathway. I Minimum acreage standard for City Park: The City is willing to develop and maintain Community Parks, Urban Parks, and Neighborhood Parks. Neighborhood Parks will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. The City may choose to maintain neighborhood parks at an acreage of seven acres or larger. It will be the responsibility of private homeowner groups or associations to develop and maintain the smaller mini parks and some Neighborhood Parks in their Exhibit E Messina Meadows subdivision that the City does not maintain. Construction fill and grading must be approved by the Meridian Parks Director. 4. Standard for Mitigation of trees: The standard established in the City of Meridian Landscape Ordinance (MCC 12-13-13-6) will be followed. 5. Standard Plan for Protection of Existing Trees during Construction: The standard established in the City of Meridian Landscape Ordinance (MCC 12-13-13) will be followed. MVRIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development and/or plat do not offer natural surveillance opportunities of the public areas. Prior to the next public hearing, the applicant shall meet with the Police Chief and/or Planning Staff to discuss features that increase visibility, including but not limited to: doors and windows that look out on the public areas, front porches, and adequate nighttime lighting. The site plan and/or landscaping plan shall be revised in accord with those discussions. 2. Any interior fencing shall allow visibility from the street or shall not exceed four feet in height if solid fencing is used. Central District Health Department 1. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 2. Stormwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. 3. The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject project shall obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that prevents groundwater and surface water degradation. SANITARY SERVICES 1. Please contact Bill Gregory at SSC (888-3999) for detailed review of your proposal and submit stamped (approved) plans with your certificate of zoning compliance application. 2. SSC will not provide trash pick-up services utilizing the common driveway. The developer shall install a concrete pad at the end of the common drive no more than five (5) feet behind the sidewalk The pad shall be of sufficient area to accommodate the receptacles of the residences that take access from the common driveway. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Exhibit E —Messina Meadows Site Specific Conditions of .Approval 1. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Amity Road and construct a 5 -foot concrete sidewalk located a minimum of 41 -feet from the centerline of Amity Road. OR Dedicate 38 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Amity Road and construct a 5 -foot concrete sidewalk located within the landscape buffer. Place the sidewalk within an easement. 2. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Eagle Road and construct a 5 -foot concrete sidewalk located a minimum of 41 -feet from the centerline of Eagle Road. OR Dedicate 38 -feet of right-of-way and construct a 5 -foot concrete sidewalk located within the landscape buffer. Place the sidewalk within an easement. 3. Construct a continuous left -turn lane on Eagle Road at the intersection of Eagle Road and East Mona Lisa Drive. Provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. 4. Construct a right turn -lane on Amity Road at the intersection of Amity Road and Montague Way. Coordinate the design of the taper with District staff. 5. Construct a left -tum lane on Amity Road at the intersection of Amity Road and Montague Way. Provide a minimum of I00 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. 6. Shift East Mona Lisa Drive to intersect Eagle Road approximately 60 -feet to the north to directly align with Zaldia Lane. 7. Construct South Montague Way to intersect Amity Road at the east property line, as proposed. Construct East Mona Lisa Drive as an alternative street section that includes two 17 -foot travel lanes with 2 -foot concrete ribbon curb and an 8 -foot drainage swale on both sides of the roadway within a total of 72 -feet of right-of-way. Construct a 5 -foot sidewalk located outside of the right-of-way within an easement (if it is determined that this development meets the criteria for the alternative street section). If it is determined that this site does not meet the established criteria, construct East Mona Lisa Drive as standard residential collector that includes a 36 -foot street section with vertical curb, gutter, and 5 -foot concrete sidewalk Exhibit E —Messina Meadows 0 0 within 50 -feet of right-of-way. Front on housing and direct lot access is prohibited regardless of the approved street section. 9. Construct Genoard Avenue and Deer Hill Drive as alternative street sections that include two 16 -foot travel lanes, 2 -foot concrete ribbons, 8 -foot drainage swales, 4 -foot detached concrete sidewalks, and 2 -foot utility easements (if the criteria for the alternative street section can be met) within a total of 64 -feet of right-of-way or construct Genoard Avenue and Deer Hill Drive as a standard residential street that includes a 36 -foot street section with rolled curb, gutter, and 5 -foot concrete sidewalk within 50 -feet of right-of-way. 10. Construct South Montague Way (from Amity Road to East Santo Stefano Drive) as one half of a 36 -foot street section with vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk located on one side of the roadway and a 3 -foot gravel shoulder and an adequately sized barrow ditch on the unimproved portion of the roadway. Create a centerline within the roadway to sheet storm drainage appropriately. Front on housing and direct lot access is prohibited. 11. Construct a portion of East Taormina Drive (abutting the 3.0 -acre out parcel) as one half of a 36 -foot street section with rolled curb, gutter and sidewalk located on one side of the roadway and a 3 -foot gravel shoulder and an adequately sized barrow ditch on the unimproved portion of the roadway. Create a centerline within the roadway to sheet storm drainage appropriately. 12. Construct the remainder of the internal streets as alternative street sections that include two 16 -foot travel lanes with 2 -foot concrete ribbons and 8 -foot drainage swales on both sides of the roadway within 52 -feet of right-of-way. Construct a 4 -foot wide concrete sidewalk that is located outside of the right-of-way within an easement. If it is determined that this site does not meet the established criteria, construct the internal local roadways as standard 36 -foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5 -foot concrete sidewalk within 50 -feet of right-of-way. 13. Extend East Deerhill Drive from the west property line approximately 210 -feet south of the north property line, as proposed. 14. Shift the proposed stub street (South Zisa Avenue) to the west to serve the 14.7 - acres site to the south. Construct the stub street in a location that is conducive to the redevelopment of the 14.7 -acre site to the south. Provide the District with a road trust for one half of the cost of constructing a bridge over the Ten Mile Creek. Install a sign at the terminus of the stub street that states, "this road will be extended in the future." 15. Construct a stub street (South Messina Way) to the south property line located approximately 399 -feet west of the east property line, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the stub street that states, "this road will be extended in the future." Exhibit E —Messina Meadows 0 0 16. Construct South Montague Way as a "quasi -stub street" abutting the property line, as proposed. 17. Construct a stub street (South Burro Avenue) to the south property line that is located approximately 900 -feet west of Eagle Road, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the stub street that states, "this road will be extended in the future." 18. Extend a stub street (South Burro Avenue) from the north property line into the site approximately 865 -feet west of Eagle Road, as proposed. 19. Extend a stub street (South Montague Avenue) from the north property line into the site approximately 1,440 -feet west of Eagle Road, as proposed. 20. Extend a stub street (South DaVinci Way) from the north property line into the site approximately 760 -feet east of the west property line, as proposed. 21. Construct three roundabouts within the subdivision. Design the roundabouts with 21 -foot street sections on either side of the center island with splitter islands and adequate signage. Coordinate the size and design of the roundabout with traffic services staff. 22. Construct the islands located within the public right-of-way a minimum of 4 -feet wide with a minimum area of 100 -square feet and should maintain a 21 -foot street section on either side of the island. All proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat shall be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. A note of this will be required on the final plat. 23. Construct one cul-de-sac turnaround within the subdivision (South Genoard Place), as proposed. Construct the turnaround to provide a minimum turning radius of 45 -feet. 24. Construct Decameron Lane, Ragusa Lane and Burro Lane as private roadways (if the City of Meridian approves them as private roadways). Pave the private roadways a minimum of 20 -feet wide and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of the public roadway and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot curb radii abutting the existing roadway edge. Provide a plan showing how the private road grade meets the public road. 25. Other than the access points that have specifically been approved with this application, direct lot access to Eagle Road and Amity Road is prohibited. A note will be required on the final plat stating these access restrictions. 26. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. Exhibit E —Messina Meadows 0 0 Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way. 2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 4. Utility street cuts in pavement Iess than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 6. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 7. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #200, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right -of --way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1- 800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACED Traffic Operations 387- 6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway Exhibit E —Messina Meadows 0 0 District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Exhibit E —Messina Meadows Ll 0 Messina Meadows Subdivision CUP -05-026 CUP/Pl) Site Specific and Standard Conditions SITE SPECIFIC C®1 DMIONS-CON.DITI®NAL USE PERMIT 1. The site plan prepared by Briggs Engineering, Inc, dated March 14, 2005, is approved, with the conditions listed herein. Applicant shall meet all of the requirements of the Annexation/Zoning (AZ -05-017) and Preliminary Plat (PP - 05 -019) as a condition of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP -05-026). 2. The project shall conform to the It -8 dimensional standards, except as follows: L Minimum frontage: 40 -feet (non cul-de-sac lots)(non common lots) 2. Minimum lot dimensions: 3,600 sq ft. 3. Minimum Setbacks shall be: Residential Building Sethaekc Front (Living Space) -- 15 -feet Front Face of Gana e) 20 -feet Rear 15 -feet Rear, side entry garage 5 -feet Interior Side* 5 -feet Street Side 15 -feet * No additional setback per story Exemptions to residential Building Setbacks - For Blocks 22 and 23 the following shall apply: Setback from Parkway — 5 -Feet Setback from Private Street — 20 -Feet 3. Construction within Messina Meadows Subdivision shall substantially comply with the elevations submitted by the applicant. Construction materials used on the structures shall be approved by the City of Meridian Building Department and in accordance with the most recent Uniform .Building Code. 4. The future home on Lot 6, Block 9 will be a single level, with a bonus room allowance. All dormers would face east and the windows would be designed for first floor only on the west side and the garage will be constructed on the same setback as the driveway (5' to north property line of Lot 6 Block 9). 5. The future homes on Lots 8 and 9 of Block 9 will have all dormers face east and the windows would be designed for first floor only on the west side. Exhibit F — Messina Meadows 11 6. A six foot solid vinyl fence will be placed on the east, north, and west side of the property in question and the north side will be designed with a berm if needed to mitigate headlights 7. Provide a minimum of one pressure irrigation stub from each side of the Stark's property, which would be the north, east, and west property lines 8. Provide a sewer and water stub to the property line from Messina Meadows to the north property line of the Starks's property. Exhibit F — Messina Meadows 0 • EXHIBIT G Messina Meadows Subdivision AZ -05-017 Zoning Amendment Findings According to Meridian City Code (MCC) 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, both the Planning & Zoning Commission and Council are required "to review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment." The following is the list of standards found in 11-15-11: Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment; In Chapter VII of the Comprehensive Plan, `medium density' is defined as areas including single-family homes at densities of three to eight dwelling units per acre. Staff finds that the requested zoning designation, R-8, is harmonious with and in accordance with the 2002 Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map, which designates the land to be "Medium Density Residential". The 3.58 dwelling units per acre proposed with the preliminary plat are consistent with previous Commission and Council actions and generally conform to the goals, objectives, and action items contained in the Comprehensive Plan for this area. In addition, the applicant's cover letter (dated March 7, 2005) lists several Comprehensive Plan policies, all of which support the annexation and proposed residential use of the property. Staff finds the following 2002 Comprehensive Plan text policies to be applicable to this application (staff analysis is in italics below policy): After evaluating the original preliminary plat submittal and the Comprehensive Plan policies regarding hazardous use (floodplain), multi -use pathway, and preservation of natural features areas, staff discussed with the applicants agent the portion of the site within the floodplain and along the Ridenbaugh Canal, the Eight Mile Drain and Ten -Mile Drain designated for multi -use pathways. Staff expressed concerns that the proposal needed to conform to the purpose statement of the natural features goals and policies and staff can make the findings to recommend approval based on the following: Chapter V A.2 P30 - Hazardous Areas — The purpose of the floodplain District is to guide development in the flood -prone areas of any watercourse that is consistent with the requirements for the conveyance of flood flows and to minimize the expense and inconveniences to the individual property owners and Exhibit G — Messina Meadows the general public through flooding. Uses permitted in this district are generally associated with open space, recreational, and agricultural land uses and do not hinder the movement of floodwaters. The applicant has submitted a letter from Paul Kunz (April 28, 2005) indicating that the applicant has made the first indications of filing for a Letter of Map Revision to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The letter indicates that if the farm access roads are removed within the Bellingham Parkproposal then the 100 yearfloods would be contained within the naturally graded banks of Ten Mile Creek. As reported soils types closest to the Ten Mile Creek are prone to flooding with seasonal high groundwater levels at 5-10 feet below grade. The submitted plan has seventy (70) lots proposed in the current floodplain designation. The applicant has reviewed a letter from John Anderson, of Nampa Meridian Irrigation District addressing usage along major canal systems. Staff`' feels the plat dated March 14, 2005 adequately addresses the location of the multi- use pathways which provide a buffer from the creeks to residential lots and will not hinder the movement offloodwaters. Chapter VI C.2 P71 — Multiuse pathways: Pathways that encourage use by bicyclists and pedestrians can decrease road congestion and add to the community's quality of life. The proposed off-street and multiuse pathway systems are depicted in Figures VI -3 and VI -4. New and existing developments should ensure that the guidelines laid out in this plan are adopted. The applicant has included multiuse pathways proposed in this development. The Comprehensive Plan indicates in Figures VI -3 and VI -4 the locations of pathways along the Ridenbaugh Canal, Eight Mile Creek, and Ten Mile Creek. In response to the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District letter indicating the need to have all pathways located away from the interchange of the Ten -Mile Creek and the Ridenbaugh Canal, the applicant has proposed an alternate route for the pathway. Staff supports the pathway system in these locations. With the relocation of the pathways away from the canal systems the applicant has also proposed a more intensive use closer to the irrigation interchange than a pathway. The following goals and policies support the request for additional open space along natural resources: Exhibit G — Messina Meadows 0 0 ® "Preserve and conserve our waterways, wetlands, wildlife habitat, and other natural resources."(Chapter V, Goal I, Objective Al) e "Preserve open space for recreation conservation and aesthetics" (Chapter V, Goal I, Objective A2) a "Identify waterways, wetlands, and other natural resources for preservation" (Chapter V, Goal I, Objective A, Action item 1) o "Identify feasible interconnected greenbelt areas along waterways, railroads, etc." (Chapter V, Goal I, Objective A, Action item 2) C "Develop and maintain greenbelts along waterways" (Chapter V, Goal I, Objective A, Action item 4) • "Improve and protect creeks (Five Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile, Ten Mile, South Slough, and Jackson and Evans drainages) throughout commercial, industrial, and residential areas" (Chapter V, Goal 1, Objective A, Action item 11) Staff also finds the following 2002 Comprehensive Plan text policies to be applicable to this application (staff analysis is in italics below policy): • "Require appropriate landscape and buffers along transportation corridors (setback, vegetation, low walls, berms, etc.)." (Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective D, Action item 4) As depicted on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map, the applicant is proposing to construct a 25 foot wide landscape berm with vegetation along Eagle Road. Staff is supportive of these widths, as long as the entire buffer lies outside the ultimate right-of-way, and the sidewalk is located outside of the 25 foot wide buffer (or increase buffer to 40 feet). See Site Specific Condition #S in the Preliminary Plat section below. • "Consider "Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel: A Recommended Approach" from the National Center for Bicycling and Walking in all land use decisions." (Chapter VI, Goal II, Objective A, #3) This publication encourages jurisdictions to establish bikeway and walkway facilities in new construction and reconstruction projects, in a manner that is safe, accessible and convenient. The proposal as • "On -street bikeways should be incorporated on all future Collector streets." (Chapter VI, Figure VI -5) Figure VI -5 on page 57 of the Comprehensive Plan designates an on -street bikeway mid -mile between Victory Road and Amity Road. The applicant is proposing a 36 foot street section for Wrightwood Way (collector). The applicant has not proposed an onstreet bike path for Locust Grove road between Victory and Amity but the addition of a 10 foot gravel shoulder for future expansions should accommodate bike lanes. Exhibit G — Messina Meadows 0 0 A portion of the site located south of the quarter section line is locatd in the "Low Density Residential" Designation. In Chapter VII of the Comprehensive Plan, `Low density' is defined as areas including single-family homes at densities of three dwelling units or lessber acre. The applicant is requesting that all the subject site be zoned R-8 (Medium Density Residential) and has made a request for a `step up' in density. The R-8 district allows for a maximum of eight (8) dwelling units per acre (MCC11-7-2.C). The applicant's requested design provides for larger lots consistent with a lower density transitional area. The comprehensive plan states on Page 104, Objective D- Plan for appropriate uses within rural areas: "Require new urban density subdivisions which abut or are proximal to existing low density residential land uses to provide landscaped screening or transitional densities with larger, more comparable lot sizes to buffer the interface between urban level densities and rural residential densities. " There is one approximately 3 acre lot located immediately south of the property classified as Low density residential. The applicant has calculated a residential density of 3.37 dwelling units to the acre for the overall low density designated area, however the lots surrounding the southern property are significantly larger and designed in such a manner as to be least intrusive. Although it would be possible to require an R-4 zoning designation staff sees the value in allowing one zoning designation on the entire subdivision. Staff supports the step up in density for this project. Staff recommends that the Commission and Council rely on staff's analysis, public testimony received and any comments submitted from any other agencies or departments regarding whether the proposed zone and subsequent development is harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. 1B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the future; Concurrent with the annexation and zoning application, the applicant has submitted a preliminary plat and conditional use permit proposing single-family lots on the subject site (PP -05-019 & CUP -05-026). Staff does not anticipate that the applicant plans to rezone the subject property in the future if the accompanying CUP/PD and PP applications are approved. C. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning —for example, a residential area turning into a commercial area by means of conditional use permits; The existing proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff does not anticipate commercial or other uses are planned for the site. Exhibit G — Messina Meadows 0 0 D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area; Staff finds that a substantial portion of the land to the north has been developed (or approved for development) in a manner similar to the proposed subdivision, with single-family dwelling units. The Tuscany Lakes Development (Tuscany Lakes, Messina Hills, Messina Village) to the north was approved with a gross density of 2.34 dwelling units per acre and a school site. Tuscany Lakes Subdivision is an R-4 subdivision with the lot range from 10,000 sq feet to 30,000 square feet. Neighboring Ada County Developments are in the 1 acre to 5 acre size range. This development is proposing significantly smaller lots, but within the acceptable limits for a medium density development bordering a low density residential area. There have been no recent street improvements in the area. Further, Eagle Road (south of Victory Road) is not currently scheduled within ACHD's Five Year Work Program or Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) for roadway widening. This entire development is not currently serviceable by the City of Meridian's sanitary sewer system. Phase 1 shall be served by a connection in Messina Village Subdivision #2, while sewer service for the western and southern phases of the development will be via the future main located along Ten -Mile Creek, through Tuscany Subdivision and piped under the Ridenbaugh Canal. If this development is approved, it shall be subject to extending the sewer system. Other urban services, such as water, are near to this site and the applicant should be able to extend such services to the site in cooperation with Meridian Public Works. Staff fords that the subject site is more dense than surrounding proposals and provides a housing type which has not been utilized in the immediate vicinity (Blocks 22-23). The overall proposal is consistent for development in a fashion similar to other properties in the area. E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; The applicant has submitted several front elevations for the proposed single- family homes. If the homes are constructed in substantial compliance with the submitted elevations, they will be similar in design to other resideinces in the area. The existing character of the area will, and is, currently changing. However, this is one of the first developments to apply for residential uses south of the Ridenbaugh canal. This development will set the tone for how the rest of this area, particularly the south, develops or does not develop. Exhibit 0 -- Messina Meadows 0 0 The mromosed homes must be designed constructed and maintained in significant comRIiancc to the recommendations as listed by the Geotechnical experts report The houses must be designed in a fashion as to not allow an_groundwater to enter the crawlsmaces otherwise the housing - ducts should be constructed without crawlsmaces F. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; Due to other existing and proposed uses near the site, staff does not anticipate that the proposed zoning/uses will be physically hazardous to future or existing uses or neighbors in the area. The floodplain must be engineered as to not hinder any floodwaters leaving the site. If a flood event occurs and buildings impact the flow of water downstream then the use may become hazardous to the neighboring properties. Staff recommends that the Commission and Council rely on staff analysis, comments from other agencies, and public testimony to determine whether the proposed use will be disturbing or hazardous to the existing neighboring uses and future expected uses in this vicinity. G. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; This entire development is not currently serviceable by the City of Meridian's sanitary sewer system. Phase 1 shall be served by a connection in Messina Village Subdivision #2, while sewer service for the western and southern phases of the development will be via the future main located along Ten -Mile Creek, through Tuscany Subdivision and piped under the Ridenbaugh Canal. If this development is approved, it shall be subject to extending the sewer system. Other urban services, such as water, are near to this site and the applicant should be able to extend such services to the site. Water to serve this development is existing or currently under development with Tuscany Lakes Subdivision. The applicant shall be responsible for the extension of utilities to and through this proposed development. Sizing and routing shall be coordinated with the Public Works Department. The applicant and/or future property owners will be required to pay park and highway impact fees as well as construct on-site storm water drainage facilities. Exhibit G — Messina Meadows 0 • Eased on the comments received from other agencies/departments, staff finds that the public services listed above can be made available to accommodate the proposed development. The Commission and Council should reference any written and/or verbal testimony submitted by any public service provider, regarding their ability to adequately service this project. IEL Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; If approved, the developer will be financing the extension of sewer, water, public street infrastructure, utilities and irrigation services to serve the project. The primary public costs to serve the future residents will be fire, police, school facilities and services. Staff finds there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost and this development will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. I. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; Staff recognizes that traffic and noise will increase with the approval of a development on this site; however, staff does not believe that the amount generated will be detrimental to the general welfare of the public. Staff does not anticipate that annexation and development in accordance with current city code and the Comprehensive Plan will create excessive noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. Fencing along all canals and waterways shall be a minimum of 6' in height and constructed of non-combustible materials as to not interfere with regular maintenance of ditches and waterways by Nampa Meridian Irrigation District. J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; The applicant is proposing to construct one public street entrance into the site from Eagle Road and a public street connection to the site from Amity Road and a stub street at the %x section line as outlined by the comprehensive plan. The proposed public street entrances to Eagle and Amity Roads have been proposed to ACHD. If all vehicular approaches (streets) are approved and constructed in accordance with ACHD policies, staff does not believe that the subdivision will create interference with traffic on the surrounding public streets. Please review any comments from ACHD for this project for additional information regarding this finding. Exhibit G — Messina Meadows K. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and The comprehensive plan defines the Ten -Mile Creep and Eight Mile Creek as a natural features of importance, as described in the Annexation and Zoning Analysis A. The applicant should make all attempts at preservation of this natural feature. There are many game species in the vicinity which utilize the drainage systems for habitat. Any existing trees larger than 4" caliper that are removed should be mitigated for, per the Landscape Ordinance. Staff recommends that the Commission and Council reference any public testimony that may be presented to determine whether or not the proposed development may result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature(s) of importance of which staff is unaware. L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of Meridian. (Ord. 592,11-17-1992)? In accordance with the findings listed above, staff fords that the annexation/zoning of this property, as proposed by the applicant, would be in the best interest of the City. Exhibit 0 — Messina Meadows 40 EXHIBIT H Messina Meadows Subdivision PP -05-019 Preliminary Plat Findings Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the following: A. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Flan; Please see Annexation and Zoning Analysis "A" above. B. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development; Please see Annexation and Zoning Analysis "G" above. C. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement program; Because the developer will be required to install sewer, water, and utilities for the development at their cost, staff finds that a development on this property will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. D. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services. Staff recommends the Commission and Council rely upon comments submitted from the public service providers (i.e. police, fire, ACHD, etc.) to determine this finding. (See finding "G" under Annexation and Zoning Analysis above, and the Agency Comments and Conditions at the end of this report for more detail.) E. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the Commission's attention. Staff finds that there should not be any health, safety or environmental problems associated with this subdivision that should be brought to the Council or Commission's attention; other than the floodway and potential groundwater/soils issues previously discussed, no hazardous natural features have been identified on the site. ACRD considers road safety issues in their analysis. Staff finds the Commission and Council should rely on any public testimony that may be presented to determine whether the proposed use may cause health, safety or environmental problems of which staff are aware. LJ Messina Meadows Subdivision CUP -05-026 CUP/PD Findings i_1 L -1 The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed conditional use in terms of the following and may approve a conditional use permit if they shall find evidence presented at the hearings) is adequate to establish (11- 17-3): A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open spaces, parking, landscaping and other features as may be required by this ordinance; As part of the Planned Development (PD) the applicant is requesting relief from the standard street frontage requirement and lot size requirement and standard setbacks, as required by Meridian City Code. See Special Consideration #1 below for detailed analysis. Staff finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the requested use and all other required features. Although the site is large enough to accommodate all of the features required by ordinance, the applicant has asked, through the Planned Development, to modify specific development standards. B. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance; Staff finds that the proposed single-family residential subdivision, with a gross density of 3.58 dwelling units per acre, is generally harmonious with and in accordance with the 2002 Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map, which designates the site to be "Medium Density Residential" and "Low Density Residential" (provided the Commission and Council grant the requested planned development). Please see Annexation & Zoning Analysis "A" above. C. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area; Please see Annexation & Zoning Analysis "E" above. D. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity; Exhibit I — Messina Meadows • Staff recommends that the Commission and Council rely upon public testimony, staffs analysis, and other agency comments when determining if the proposed uses will adversely affect other properties in the vicinity. E. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; Please see Annexation & Zoning Analysis "G" and "H" above, the Other Agency/Department Comments and Conditions at the end of this report, and any comments that may be submitted to the City Clerk regarding this project. F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; Please see Annexation & Zoning Analysis "H" above. O. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; Please see Annexation and Zoning Analysis "I" above. H. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; Please see Annexation & Zoning Analysis "J" above. The Commission and Council should review any comments received from the ACRD provide for this project when determining this finding. I. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. Please see Annexation & Zoning Analysis "K" above. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS—CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. Reduced Standards: As stated earlier, the applicant is requesting modifications from standard ordinance requirements for street frontage and lot size. Lot Size: The applicant has requested reduced lot sizes; the submitted preliminary plat has lots below the 6,500 square -foot minimum size. 'Therefore, a modification Exhibit I — Messina Meadows • • to the standard R-8 lot size of 6,500 square -feet is applicable. The proposed lot sizes range from 3,600 square -feet to 30,713 square -feet. Lot Frontage: The minimum requested street frontage is 40 -feet. There are lots that have between 40 -feet and 168 -feet of frontage (654eet is the minimum for the R-8 zone). The Lots located in Blocks 22 and 23 along the private streets and the lots to be accessed through Common Drives also require relief from the minimum street frontage. Staff is supportive of reducing the frontage for some of the lots as it provides lot diversity. Setbacks: The minimum requested setbacks as defined by the submittal of 3/14/05 is detailed above. Staff recommends that all street setbacks comply with these requests (See Site Specific Conditions—Preliminary Plat). Side yard setbacks shall be five (5) feet and rear yard setbacks shall be 15 feet. Staff would recommend even greater setbacks for lots along canals and waterways to help mitigate any NMiD issues. 2. Amenities: MCC 12-6-2.A.3 requires two or more amenities to be provided as part of each planned development. The proposed amenities for the subject planned development include: a 8.5 -acre public park, an extensive open space lot system for multi -use pathways and a common lot with a clubhouse and a pool. The proposed open space makes up greater than 10% of the site, 5% minimum is required and it takes 10% to count open space as an amenity. However, on site parking for the public park has not been addressed by the applicant. On -street parking will be limited adjacent to the 8.5 acre park along the collector roadways. The applicant is proposing parking for the clubhouse located on Lot 3, Block 1 to be located off of Tusa Street. As proposed, staff believes the proposed park and open space areas provide sufficient amenities relative to the size of the proposed development. Landscaped open space means land exclusive of street rights-of- way and street buffers, except for right-of-way specifically dedicated for landscaping within a subdivision. The applicant states that the total open space areas account for 18.68 acres of which approximately 14 -acres count toward open space which meets the open space definition in the PD ordinance. No drainage lots, required street buffers, or canal buffers have been included in this calculation. 3. Elevations: The applicant has submitted several front elevation drawings for the proposed dwelling units. Staff believes that the dwelling units will be compatible with the adjoining uses, if the buildings are constructed as shown on the submitted elevations. Construction within Messina Meadows Subdivision should substantially comply with the elevations submitted by the applicant. Construction materials used on the structures should be approved by the City of Meridian Building Department and in accordance with the most recent Uniform Building Code. See Site Specific Condition #4 below. Exhibit I — Messina Meadows January 27,2W6 AZ 05-017 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 31, 2006 APPLICANT Tuscany Development, Inc. ITEM NO. REQUEST Tabled Ordinance from January 24, 2006 — Request for Annexation and Zoning of 137.96 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Messina Meadows Subdivision — South Eagle Road between East Victory Road and East Amity Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: See Previous Item Packet / Minutes Contacted: Date: . Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. DAVID NAVARRO AMOUNT .00 ; " BOISE IDAHO 02f02106. 17 PM DEPUTY Patti Thomps I RECORDED -REQUEST OF City of Meridian 106017066 CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. e i� -/2 /?, BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, DONNELL, ROUNTREE, WARDLE AN ORDINANCE (AZ -05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) FOR ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE S % OF SECTION 29, AND ALL OF LOT 2, BLOCK 11, OF PROPOSED MESSINA HILLS SUBDIVISION NO.2 LYING IN TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT "A" AND ANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF SAID LANDS FROM RUT (ADA COUNTY) TO R- 8 (MEDIUM DENSITY) IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A" is within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation and re -zoning by the owner of said property, to -wit: Lynn B. Asay & Suzanne W Asay, Harold R. Long & Teressa K. Long, Elisa Anne Lee, and Melina Anne Henry and Paul C. Warrick. SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby annexed and re- zoned from RUT (Ada County) to R-8 (Medium Density) in the Meridian City Code. SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and zone said property. SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and re -zone said property. ANNEXATION OF AZ -05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION Page 1 of 3 SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8. The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to -wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho. SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (1/2) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of t��.v& q , 2006. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of 2006. x WILLIAM G. BERG, de WEERD ANNEXATION OF AZ -05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION Page 2 of 3 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ) ss. County of Ada ) On this � day of �%�.� L0LXj�, , 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, pefionally appeared TAMMY de WEERD and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL)' o T4 •,CA0 • i i r • NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO RESIDING AT: Tay (`k -, u 4 1 + IND MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: j() --j {'i j ANNEXATION OF AZ -05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION Page 3 of 3 NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A) CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 06- 112--12-- PROVIDING 121ZPROVIDING FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE An Ordinance of the City of Meridian granting annexation and zoning for land located in the S % of Section 20, and all of Lot 2, Block 11, of Proposed Messina Hills Subdivision, Lying in Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Attachment "A". This parcel contains 136.72 acres more or less. Also, this parcel is SUBJECT TO all easements and rights-of-way of record or implied. As surveyed in attached exhibit `B" and is not based on an actual field survey. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall become effective on the day of Mayor and City Counify 4n By: William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk: -2 First Reading: V �¢ Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code Second Reading: Third Reading: _ ate, di i ! nrs by suspension of the SNO �,,'J'dSNlfill! 81114\\\\\\ STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 06- Q 1 I The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance No. 06- 1c) 1 of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A (3). DATED this f day of 2006. William. L.M. Nary City Attorney ORDINANCE SUMMARY — AZ -05-017 MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION— Page 1 REVISED DESCRIPTION CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXATION MESSINA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION January 13, 2006 A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE S 1/2 AND THE NE 114 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER THE SE 114 OF SECTION 29, T.3N., R.1 E., B.M., THENCE N 89.37'43" W 25.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SE 114 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF S. EAGLE ROAD, THE. REAL POINT OF Or OF THIS ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION THENCE S 0003T09" W 1321.32 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NE 114 OF SAID SE 114; THENCE N 89039'50" W 1307.62 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SW 114 OF SAID SE 1/4; THENCE S 00026!23"W 1297.78 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SAID SE 1/4 TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF E. AMITY ROAD; THENCE N 89°4343" W 383:82 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY TO A POINT; THENCE N 00°50'13" E 473.19 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 89°50'46" W 274.51 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 00'26'33" W 382.63 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, ALSO BEING THE CENTERLINE OF THE TEN MILE DRAIN; ALONG SAID CENTERLINE AS FOLLOWS: THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT 405AI FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1071.91 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21 °4('13", TANGENTS OF 205.16 FEET, AND CHORD WHICH BEARS N 41030"24"W 403.00 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY.- THENCE ANGENCY;THENCE N 52020'29" W 503.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SAID SE 114 (CENTER OF SECTION LINE THENCE S 00"15'10" W 4.23 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO A POINT; THENCE N 6201630" W 254.23 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 52'30'30" W 547.61 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 33°26'30" W 49.85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 29; 3111 O -ANNEX -D1 Ss.DOC LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE: THENCE N 00 0353" E 80.47 FEET ALONG SAID (NEST LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST 112 OF THE SE le OF SAID SW 114; THENCE CONTINUING N 00003'53" E 1323.69 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE E 112 OF THE NE 114 OF SAID SW 114; THENCE S 89038'09" E 669.97 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE E 1/2 OF THE NE 114 OF SAID SW 1/4 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SW 114 (C1/4 CORNER); THENCE S 8903743" E 1336.57 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NW 114 OF THE SE'/ OF SAID SECTION 29 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NW 114 OF SAID SE 1/4 (CE 1/16 CORNER); THENCE N 00'21'39° E 60.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF MESSINA VILLAGE SUBDIVISION N0.2, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 89 OF PLATS, PAGES 10280 TO 10281, ADA COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE; THENCE S 8937'43" E 1311.68 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH UNE AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF MESSINA VILLAGE SUBDIVISION N0.1, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 86 OF PLATS, PAGES 9768 TO 9759 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF S. EAGLE ROAD; THENCE S 00'27'45° W 60.00 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 137.96 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. WAYNE K. BARBER, I I IO -t NN'E-X-DFS.DOC P.L.S. 8444 .BYl,09 MX,IAIA'D SS ' s N M 7, RYE W APPBOVAL J . q �1 `r'- y y• o W ffi APR 0 4 2005 -� r MERIDIAN pIfBUC I I WORKS DEPT. .■■YLC, 3 .fafOLO b z 1 SQb0111£ 90/L£/£0 I ,OOf m .l "do J=t M .ta,W= s — VON ONWAO MCM 31VDS • 3NO 1ma SUe ORM ISaa . arca G wcaw & o"► roKVa 'AlNnoa vaV ooze -»clave) "NP8 '•3121 ''N£ 1 '9Z N0UO3S d0 2/t S 3N1 +°3 cJ eJ .40 NOMOd V OW rON VM STUN VNISS3W 03SOdONd 40 11 NO= 7 Un d0 'nV ON138 ONVI A 130NVd V n o� 8 � W�, d fieiOQV'�[ 8 ONIN33MON3 V z 0NI SODINS and 081HX3 NOLLVlCiNNV °i z kd r --�--— _—_ N �.. ^+• .L'C'ILCI M .S0.C[AO 9 — per ^.. . . ...� ' N M �— ......p �� r N I M .I ■ a ■ ` A— � I pppWrW 0�0w L�_� W W IF p 1 yy S ¢kL m r z pi_ �--�w1 Ui o ^" w a �_.._ -- - W I u . z �►rom I a V ` .BYl,09 MX,IAIA'D SS ' s N M 7, RYE W APPBOVAL J . q �1 `r'- y y• o W ffi APR 0 4 2005 -� r MERIDIAN pIfBUC I I WORKS DEPT. .■■YLC, 3 .fafOLO b z 1 J=t M .ta,W= s — — 6 -, �--�w1 Ui o ^" w a �_.._ -- I u z �►rom N. a V is +sio w U ci . — . — . —_ . _ . U yZy,I c3 .BYl,09 MX,IAIA'D SS ' s N M 7, RYE W APPBOVAL J . q �1 `r'- y y• o W ffi APR 0 4 2005 -� r MERIDIAN pIfBUC I I WORKS DEPT. .■■YLC, 3 .fafOLO b z 1 11 January 27, 2006 • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 31, 2006 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5 . REQUEST Executive Session per Idaho State code 67-2345(1) (c ) AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shalt become properly of the City of Meridian. 0 January 27, 2006 Department Reporst MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 31, 2006 APPLICANT Mayors Office ITEM NO. LO REQUEST Quarterly Update from Cheryl Brown, Economic Development Coordinator AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Emailed: Date: Phone: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. I • CL (D-O� i Q 4-0 ca � c E a m o U)N a r m 0 o �w •� •� N m �. CL O 0 > G 0 s • 0) 0 E >Oj 0 w>o° a U Nmj 4D E c:.: � W 20 V .� ELL L T OtS 0 O U W U N CN ..+� N O C: Q !r. CL C E N U Cl) N .. E C� .G cr) Q go_ m m Q L � N C U� n • • • 0 Where Community Spirit and Business Combine P� Meridian at a Glance Meridian's Top Ten Employers: Meridian School District 3,805 CitiCard 1,526 T -Mobile 948 Blue Cross of Idaho 750 St. Luke's Meridian 750 Cruicial Technology 344 Western Electronics 267 City of Meridian 250 Food Services of America 200 Sunbridge Rehab Center 153 Population Growth: Meridian Ada County Unemployment: Meridian Ada County 1990 2000 Unofficial figure from Compass 2004 2006 9,596 34,919 44,962 64,816 207,722 300,904 361,500 July 2005 2.5% 3.4% December 2005 2.3% 2.6% Job placements for 2005 for Ada County was 9047 • U') co P- O CD O O to %t P- C) CV co to 4t'O Oti V 0 OD LO N 1` CA I .t M M N M r O O LU E a m O Q Q E O O N U. U7 co N U, 40 0 0 0 M 0 0 W C) 0 w m OOtoN tnt0000�0 C m Q E 0 U O O O U) r m O a E LU y W E E O W O O N OF'- 7 7 p N O O M O) O O O O O O C O cis 000atoCoWC)M 0 00O0NrMd•N000CDOOO .0 U> O ti to O ti O N 0 `"0) c- O 'fit N qT O V CO OO — CO N 1- CL a?°'q c?NN m taEotn to nor to 9ti m N tO N tO IT CLD CD W co CoOC = CMco O CCD CCOO OWO C0O COCOCCO CO CCD CCD 0) 00 COD � V� H OD M CA M OD CO r- CD M N M OD CO OD OD OD 00 CD '-t OD CO CO M N .«; CO tm m _ m m L U a c c tQ 'v m > a � +° > o o- o 0 0 c Q Cu � c o c EL Q o a o �, m 0 3 � N m Q a m QmU mmym ooE=mY'- Qc tM row: a m G E C O m y y 0 N> V '/0 O m 0 '_ C N O e c �F-tl ECS 08 �U�rnn2LL �(L (L Jm„V o w o 0 o,m viuiow m muiuia62 uLij rn w ui Eg _>twotpompo E EOaooc)iw�oorn�toW�O'v O�- toO�t NNOvv�MC 0)0)Lo -OM1 NW CN V :.%OMrM0)MU70 COMCq MrCD v-C4covm t) ++ C m O C U V/ E O a+ Q Cm v y a 0 o E E c a �` o Q U 0 m o c m UJ A w o tm 4- .0 m + U EO •O O ym 0 ai R L 0 0 m 7 C Z U m 0 0 2 yy .c O 0 ►..I L- U p C -•to C y a C E° m m E o �F' m �' m m� 000 mom= 2- v Q. o m U y n m y m w U �•- c U ® n o 3 m m E�olmYO�Hm'��caa0Qm mm0'H� o® :e m 0� 0) m U o m . c• E E o c m t�mU�m�l=aiSQ�Ua�tiu.Umu0=U�E��� DAHO COMMERCE & LABOR DIRK KEMPTHoRNE, GOVERNOR ROGER B. MADSEN, DaEcroR January 27, 2006 To All Idaho Economic Development Professionals Dear ED Professionals: The May/June 2006 issue of SkyWest Magazine will feature a special insert focusing on Idaho as an excellent location for conducting business and recreational travel. This is a cooperative effort between Idaho Commerce Et Labor and SkyWest Magazine and expected to reach 1.5 million passengers. In addition to captive in-flight exposure, Idaho Commerce ft Labor and other economic development groups in the state will also be able to use this striking four-color insert for promotional purposes. Idaho Commerce Et Labor will provide you with a supply of these inserts, at no additional cost, based on the size of your advertising purchase. Attached please find information on this exciting advertising opportunity designed to pique the interest of travelers in our prime market area. The Idaho inserts will be on United Express flights out of Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles and San Francisco during the months of May and June. Please contact Teena Wright with SkyWest Magazine, at (208) 333-9990 ext. 106, before March 1, for additional information about this special advertising opportunity. Sincerely, I Roger B. Madsen Director STATE STREET OMCE * 700 West State Street • P.O. Box 83720 • Boise, Idaho 83720-0043 • Tel: 208-334-2470 • Fax 208-334-2631 * Web: cl.idaho.gov Equal Opportunity Employer 0 Reach more than LS million badness & leimore travek= throughout the nation who will be reading and learning about Idaho! SkyWest Magazine readers are affluent, educated and adventurous. o The most affordable advertising rates of any other in-flight publication in the country! o An exceptional opportunity to convey your message to this highly qualified audience. PLUS, Advertisers get additional exposure in S,000 overprint copies distributed by the Idaho Department of Commerce as well as regional EDC's throughout the state. l®UN ITE D EXPRESS Idaho is the third fastest growing state in the nation!' Our special section, "Incredible Idaho , will detail the extraordinary economic, lifestyle and recreational: advantages of this diverse state. ws census Bureau Be a part of this exciting Idaho sectaion! Gall now as space is hmitedl Space Deadline is March 1, 2oo6 r - A RADS (Four -Color) Full Page: $3,700 y= Half Page: $2,500 (Vertical or Horizontal) Quarter Page: $1,700 lo' (the largest circulated regional in flight magazine ;n the country) Contact: Teena Wright, .Advertising Director ( 208-333-9990 z.1o6 teena@gopublicationsinc.com www.skywcmi .azine.COM SL :1 Contact: Teena Wright, .Advertising Director ( 208-333-9990 z.1o6 teena@gopublicationsinc.com www.skywcmi .azine.COM 0 • SAIYWI magazine N U N I T E D E X P R ESS nyW- fsffie -,Wm>—ftfn-mstt of S4Wea ntdimea*p-fflnaasvm&F— Special Profile hates*: We've added an additional promotional opportunity, exclusively for Idaho Economic Development Councils, to participate in the Idaho Special Section within our May1june issue of SkyWest Magazine. These half -page profiles will be placed within the section and offer an alteraative to a display ad in that they are less expensive than a regular half -page display advertisement and are rm-house by our sta$ You simply provide 2 photos 00 dpi) and Zoo words of copy. a Idaho Special Section within United Express $2,300 (*for Idaho Economic Development Agencies ONLY) SOUTHERN U Affo It All Comes Together In Southern Idaho r+ee m�rid mfmaeom: d ehe t eomomy m s�6no tdetn a may ou 1 .ym� a�mmr�tm�me�aymm�d,od� minra dmmdmm� &,bgdo, day Eegiom_rm hudmm+daon Ban Somhw rdc5oumgovt plammmackmxdcama �y. To Coat V , of mn meas mm d dm !sass m.aamok-d derma Txapmdsm coma, xm. �.�. d tmm, mm:•� �a ceonz gagr� ad IaaF oasamg morins Ik Impm smrhno-TdaMu io dm mp IB �e "SO/Df F"IddV hOd fameastaecmd.ge�m®rom-dimasafdmageosm� aorromyvA6owof R.Ity,d.qukyafcteamp-U&dmdmM4.Voray.rtfi— tkl � �da.�ar.0WAm�am.tmmeo� mmRynib.�o�demm�tum md�ydmm- sr»crinde.T�..n wroaoocmaeeu,�crw�eo�Imt�,E�nsmmr '' �i maw-Mme.i�aoao�.raeo:fzssa�r�u+,roes�. ' PROMO: Please provide either a profession- ally scanted slide, transparency, print or an image from a high-quality ditial camera (horizontal fits format the best). Photos provided as scanned files or from a digital camera must be CMYV,, .tif format, at 300 dpi and are accepted on Zip, CD, or as an e-mail attachment. Photos can be in color or black and white. If you do not have a professionally scanned file, please send the original for us to scan for you. COPY: Please send in no more than 200 words of copy. CHARGES: Production is included in rate. For more information and tD reserve your space, cA nowt Space Deadline is March 1, 20o6 Teens W t, Advertisin Director 1208-333-9990 teena@gopub 'cations.com rwwwskywestmagazine.com • 0 Airports in Southwest Idaho N + Airports 0 10 20 40 Miles Idaho Counties New AAE Airport McCall I McCall Airport Donnelly Airport Airport Payette Municipal L Garden Valley Airport 'i IJJ 1T, Emmett Idaho City Weatherby USFS Airport USFS Airport 4 Caldwell n I Atlant Airport III Boise Smith Prarie Airport Sun Velle Nampa Bol a final mpa Go n Field M nici I Airport Friedman Memorial Pine Airport Moun ain Home Muni pal Airport Mountain Home Mountain Home - AFB Airport Glenns Fe Municipal Community Planning Assoclatlon ofSouthwestidaho Twin Falls Magic Valley S:\membersWdaCounty\Meridian\1205mapslswidahoairports.mxd Regional Airport City of Meridian Accessed Property Tax Value by Category $1,800,000,000 $1,600,000,000 $1,400,000,000 commercial $1,200,000,000 +-Pemmai Prop" $1,000,000,000 tResideMial $800,000,000 $600,000,000 i _ tUtpily $400,000,000--W-Other $200,000,000 $0 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 City of Meridian - Property Tax Burden by Category 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 City of Meridian 2004 Property Tax Burden Commercial Residential Manuf Exempt yy Utility Farm Transition land Personal Rnandal Managemerd 1/31/2008 Ocommmdm OPwOnel Property OReStdaf l a Umly ■ODW 0 i I I I 0 Ail �k 6- b y a O .•a look q LO N N r � O J5?b 0 sliwaad U. LL LL UL I I I 0 Ail �k 6- b y a O .•a look q LO N N r � O J5?b 0 sliwaad V a a CD 0 0