Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Glennbrook Properties & Simida Corp CUP
F,a;. • l: Ada County Highway District: 2: Nampa Meridian Irrigiation: T 3: Central District Health: See 4: City Engineer: See Attached: 5: Sewer Departrnent: No Coituztent: 6: Public Hearing before P 7: Comments from ACHD & Na are now attached: 8: Letter from State Higher y DA COUI~ITY HIGHWA D~S'TRICT A 3~0 ~.~-aT 3~ s~ess~r . OOlas, IDAHO 03714 ~. Inter-Department Correspondence To: Ada County Highway District Commission Date: August 19, 1988 From: Development Services Subjeict: MERIDIAN CONDITIONAL USE - HIGHWAY 55 & I-84 (James Kiser, 376-3100) FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. Glenbrook Properties and Simida Corporation request Conditional Use approval for a mixed use planned unit development to be constructed in two phases with some subdivision of land anticipated. Z. Highway 55 is under the jurisdiction of the Idaho Transportation Department, contact them for any requirements or comments they may have. 3. Highway 55 is to be turned over to Ada County Highway District upon completion of the Eagle Road interchange. 4. I-84 is under the jurisdiction of the~Idaho Transportation Department, contact them for any requirements or comments they may have. ' 5. Stratford Drive has 50-feet of right-of-way (60-feet is required) ,and is improved with gravel. 6. Staff is recommending 60-feet of right-of-way and collector standard streets throughout this project due to the commercial and industrial uses included. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Provide by dedication 30-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Stratford abutting parcel. 2. Provide curb, gutter, 5-foot sidewalk on Stratford abutting parcel. Provide 1/2 of a 41-foot back-to-back roadway section, plus 12-feet of paving. 3. Provide 30-feet of paving on Stratford from the project limit to Franklin Road. L;-v ~,I - _k -~ %f~ ~: , ~~,;,, ~' ft~:. ~~.~ C:'r`i ^ MERIDIAN CONDITIONA~SE - HWY 69 & I-84 August 19, 1988 Page 2 4. All interior streets shall be built to a collector street section with 60-feet of right-of-way minimum. 5. In cooperation with the Idaho Transportation Department, District 3, the following improvements on Highway 55 are requested: a. Stripe southbound left turn lanes at both entrances. b. Continue the acceleration/deceleration lane from the I-84 interchange to the north entrance. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1. Improvements to the dedicated right-of-way to be designed and constructed to ACRD standards and specifications. 2. All dedicated streets to be constructed and designed to ACRD standards and specifications. 3. All specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to Ada County Highway District are to be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Profes- sional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in accordance with Idaho Code 54-1215. 4. Obtain written approval from irrigation/drainage jurisdiction for storm runoff into irrigation/drainage system(s). 5. Relocate all obstructions outside of the proposed street improvements. Prior to relocation, obtain written permission from the applicable jurisdiction. 6. Relocate all irrigation/drainage structures outside of the public right-of-way. Prior to relocation, obtain written approval from the applicable jurisdiction. 7. Provide for the continuation of all existing irrigation and drainage systems across parcel. 8. Submit 3-sets of street construction plans for review and approval by the District. 9. Submit a site drainage plan showing that site drainage will not~flow onto Ada County Highway District right-of-way, in accordance with Boise City Code 11-3-54 (A), where applicable, and ACRD policy. 10. Access to parcel to be reviewed and approved by the District. 11. Driveways to be located a minimum of 5-feet from the property line. N tl' .° ~ W N --- Ca N •'i •.i $ b N N a ~ro e; U H A "~ .~ H ~ °1 a H U] ~ a ~ ~ « ~ ~~ a W rOi ~ O ~ r•1 ^ rl 1d ~ W b x W 'C ~ ao o ~ ~aa~~ ~a~ O W ~ trti ~ O tOi •o d ~ H ~H't3 q z a ~ •~ O~oam U Z ro ~ ,~ tW t1WW~ ~ ~ W w W a~i ~aaao Ca7~ ~ W o O~&a~b+ a~ °w x ~ ~ zva~..,N 3 3 ~ cn i b a W ,-C .C ~ '~ v ° ° c d o o a, u ,.o o ~ ua .. o on ~ ~ •~ o o G ~ ~ a v~ b+ N ,'~ N 01 Q Rf ,.C ~tl O '+a '~ ~ ~ i , z o .IJ N 4-I M O N •r-I Sa O >~ ~ ~~ ~~ a-r O ~ N m U a-+ 00 aJ .~ ~ •~ • ~ « A ~ u ~ D,O ~ G •~ ~ cd .c ~ 3 ~ ~ 3 H • c ~ H ~ 3 H ~ '~ '~ c tl ,C + -~ ao v w ~ o ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ro 3 ~b ~a N I H 1.1 N 4-I p ~ ,.o o +~ o a b ~ ~~ ~'~ 3 v ao ~ ~ ~ A v ~ ~ ~ ° =' ° ~w q a E o w • ~ c~ ~ ~ a i ~ ro ~ ~ v A ~ i a o a o w v o ~ ° ao ~.~ w rn rl H "J C7 H a E 3 ~ ~ 0 ~ h is 3. ~ ~ 00 H ~ ~'O ~ a~ +~ .r., a 0 v v G vi ~ v ~ ~ +~ M U N I N H a..i M O N v N H U U a - • ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ H ro A ~ ~, • ~ o • 3 ~ ~ ~ U1 "/~ GO O ,3 ~ H >•+ u ~ ~ ~ ° ~ v i • ~-+ rd ~ v a ~ • ~ ~ sa ~ v .~ a, ~ cn o w ~ ~ ~ ~ A h 3 z a, a, V CJ q m a~ .{: 0 b O -~ -.•i b ffi® n ~ rn O ~~ N cPf ZO ~ ~ "~ r~I gp A •N • N Z~ ~ CO ~ C O W ?+ r•I U ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 3 O cn~~ ~~ ~ a ~'ro a o ~aU ~ ~ ~~a w ~ o .~ .~ a a w~ `~ ~ a ~ r-I U aa wW N •rl ~ 2 O •rl A q. i•I O A ~ ~Vi a N •~ ~ ~ -U' •~ • " ' b N 1.1 w d A ~ b d+ A a~r~ w e~ b u3i x w a~i m ~ •~I a~ •~I . a ~I ~- m ~ b+ H d •.~ •~I ~. x r•, o a a~ +• •a w 3 ul +~ F-I +~ a b d A O ~ 3~1 ~ ~pp ~ b+ ~ -U b+ O ~ ~ •O O N ~ O W ?~ O +~ •.~i ~ •rl Ur-1 t~ O Dr «~ ~p w ~ +~ ~ .o m x a~ +~ •~+ sr .••I -~ ~ ~ ~o N a~ m iy N ~ O v O ~ ~o ty aw al' of r+ a~ c ~ aNi a"~ E ~ ~ a~i ~ :u °' '~ ~ +~+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a°r~ o >°, ~ .o v+ ~ ao ~ v c~ a~ oa ~ as as r~ w a u W u ~ ~ a ~ u z cn ~~ H ~ ~ ~ a a~i~ ~•~ m b •~ •~ a~ •~I « C•rl Ub ~b ~I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I~€98 k'"T •ENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTME~ ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION 1455 North Orchard Boise, Idaho 83706 REVIEW SHEET Return to: Boise Rezone # Eagle Conditional Use ~' ~- ~~„~ ~,o~ (~ ~,.~,~ ,~ -~-i ~ s -~ ~'e m ~ ~ ~ ~~-r~, Meridian Preliminary/Final/Short Plat Kuna ACZ 1. _ We have no objections to this proposal. 2. _ We recommend denial of this proposal. 3. _ Specific lmowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal. 4. _ We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. 5. _ We will require more data concerning the depth of (high seasonal ground water)(solid lava) from original grade before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal. 6. _ We can approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located (2,4) feet above solid lava layers. 7. ~ We can approve this proposal for: tral sewage Interim sewage Individual sewage _ Comrrn.m~i.ty sewage system andCentral water Individual water _ Comntu~ity water well. 8. ~ Plans for Central sewage Community sewage system Sewage dry lines, and Central water Community water must be submitted to and approved by the Regional Health and Welfare Environmental Services Field Office. 9. ~ Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 10. _ This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. 11. _ If restroom facilities are to be installed then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. 12. ~ We will r wire plans be submitted for a plan review for any ~ establishment beverage establishmen swanmin~ pools or spa grocery store . Reviewed by ;:: S !~! ~O - • ~ ~ ~ ~ u M ~ ~ C• M .i.0~ ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a cn W ~"~ a e ~ a i w o ~ a ° ~ ~ a ~ o a ~ ~ O a . V a w ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ w '~ a a~ m a- E fl a a 3 ~ ~ w ® ,~5 h b. ~ ~ '~ a m a t~ y v~ a H M ~~ aim a ~~ ~ o ~ ~~y ~~ ~ W a~ a u ~~~~ ~ ~..• a -'ar' 3 N 0 °u E~~ ~I w • r t9 2 ~O r-1 N •W~ ~ O • ^ _ N C9 N - ~j ~ r-~1 u ~HH b ~ ~~ 3 0 .a ~WWiii~ p' _ _ j.' b f: O a v ~ b ~ +~1°„V °'' ~ m .. '~ .. ~ a ° ~ ~ E a ~ ~ ~ +~+ ~ taA a-+ w u f~-+ ~ v m ~ a ~ o' y «a~ ~~.~'. ~ o o b b a Q ~•a ~~ d . ~ +m1 ~ ~+ 'i OC ~ ~ f~ a1 v v ~ ~ N ~ A w ~ ~ ~ +i w b ~ b+ ~ o .~ a g~ a~ ~~ a c°~u a ~~ ~o ~ m Lti ++ ,~' ~ S o .a ~j ao ~a N~ v .• c~ m~ ~ w b~ a s ~ •~ C ~ ~ A ~ A ~ ~ .-I ~ M M b C ~ ~ 'CGS ~ ~ ~ ?~ ~ C 181.1 . ~ u ~ a4 ~t°~ oo a~ m a~ a ~ ~ a3 u ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ z ~ ~~ -+ ~o ~ a O o.~J~~ ~ •• M ~ V 'V i l l l l I I I I I I I I I i i l l i l l I I Il~~ ~~~~~ 4 0 c a a v v b i,; f~;: o ~ CONDITIONAL IISE PERMIT APPLICATION 8-9-88 GI.ENBROOK PROPERTIES ~ SIMIDA CORPORATION PROJECT BODNDARY: The property description as submitted does not include an approximate 150' frontage (Hwy. 69) X 200' depth parcel near the intersection of Meridian Rd. and Hwy. 69. It is my understanding this parcel is owned by the applicant. If so, they need to include it in this application and the description must be revised. Are the parcels of property to be developed in this park to be sold to the building owners? If so, will this require a subdivision plat? WATER ~ SEWER: Main sewer and water lines constructed in 1986-87 exist in Stratford Drive. (These are shown on the attached drawings). Gravity sewer can serve the proposed High-tech facility as well as a majority of the land remaining in the park, excepting the southwest portion. Phase I of the park will include construction of a thru-road from Hwy. 69 to Stratford Drive with water and sewer utilities installed therein. The water line will be looped from the new access road, along an alignment parallel to 8 Mile lateral, to connect again near the water tower. The type of waste discharged to the sewer must be investigated for strength and if any type of on-site pre-treatment by the Owner is necessary. Building fire sprinkling systems and landscape sprinkling systems shall be protected from backflow into the domestic system by use of City approved backflow prevention devices. ROADWAYS: Two access points from this park onto Stratford Drive should be provided. Although a frontage road along the I-84 boundary is not appropriate the "ring road" shown at 400' from I-84 should be continued to Stratford Drive. If the roadways in the park are to be public roads they need to be dedicated to ACHD and built in accordance with ACHD Standards. A subdivision plat will dedicate the roads otherwise dedication must be done by metes and bounds description. DRAINAGE ~ IRRIGATION: The method for drainage of the roadways must meet with ACHD approval and transmission of the drain water .into recognized drainage ways must be approved by the drainage ways maintaining agency. Irrigation ditches crossing the project must be continued. Any alignment change or piping must be approved by_the maintaining agency. Individual site drainage must be contained and disposed of on-site. PARKING: Off-street parking shall be provided and designed in accordance with Section~2-414:..of the City of Meridian Zoning Ordinance e . o ~~: . ~ ~, .. ,~ ,_ ,.. _. ,. E~~4: :..: ,. ~~:;, t 5' g~~;~ ~.,.Lv. ~} "t k~ ,A; l }~~. ~~ 6',~,(~wr4ai~a • ~ ~ ~ ~ • • • TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DISTRICT 3 P.O BOX 8028 BOISE, ID 83707-2028 208/334-8300 October 7, 1988 ~. ~t: ~:,.-f, ':3~ 4~!l~,~f~~. ~, <, x$~, `; ~~:~ ~,~ `ky, ~~: •ltti ': ~' tY~rY i Jack Nieman City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Id. 83642 Re: Conditional Use Permit by Glenbrook Properties and Smida Corp. located on the Northeast Corner of Meridian Interchange & SH-55 Dear Mr. Nieman: The Idaho Transportation Board will be deciding on access onto SH-55 for the Hon and Nahaus properties during their October 13 and 14, 1988, meeting. This conditional use permit will need to agree with the access as determined by our Board. In addition, we request a 20 feet set back from our Right of Way line for any structures along Interstate 84, its ramps or State Highway 55. For your information, we will be rebuilding the Meridian In- terchange in this area beginning this winter or early next spring. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me. Sincerely, SCOTT GURNSEY, P. E. District Traffic Engineer SG:ps ._J~_4~' ~~} r~1'~ ~~ AO ;~'p~.._ 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDALHHO 83651-4395 25 August 1988 Phones: Aree Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Christine L . Wh i t t ake r CHESTER A. HARGRAVE HENRY O. WEICK James Montgomery Consulting Engineers Co. LAWRENCE P. SMITH 16 I Mallard Drive Boise, Idaho 83706 ' 1968 OFFICERS Dear Christine: PRESIDENT CHESTER A. HARGRAVE VICE PRESIDENT Design plans fur the bridge or culvert structures for crossing the HENRY O. WEICK Eight Mile Lateral will be required for our review. DISTRICT MANAGER RICHARD W. HAUMANN SECRETARY of THE BOARD The District will require an exhibit in the contract stating develop- 8 DISTRICT SEC-TREAS went responsibility for the Nine Mile Drain pipe line and weed rack. CHARLES E. YOST ASSISTANT SEC-TREAS DAREN R. COON The centerline description of the Eight Mile Lateral and Nine Mile Drain is recorded under Instrument Number 7608075 at the Ada County recorders office. I have enclosed just the pages of the Nine. Mile ATTORNEYS Creek Drain and the Eight Mile Lateral. RINGERT, CLARK. HARRINGTON. REID, CHRISTENSON a The copy of the easement from Bill Hon to the Meridian City water KAUFMAN solsE tower is not available in this office. ENGINEERS ERBTULLER.INC. M I enclose Our materials, standards, and specifications. ALSO, included BOSE in the enclosures are a Land Use Change Application and a copy of an executed agreement. A similar agreement will be required for the construction work on any of the District's canals, laterals, or drains by the developer of Treasure Valley Corporate Park, Meridian, Idaho. Sincerely, P.ichard W. Haumann District Manager pc: Each Director ___ __ ' ~~; Z'. Secretary of the Board - ~p.~ phi-e`y of 2eridian Engineer ~ ~ .~„ Ada County Highway District ~ ~~ '"Y~'°- ~,.~_~~" enclosures: NMID Specifications, It~~.r~?s; & Regulations Nb1ID General Guidelines' NMID Sand & Oil Trap Right-of-way centerline description Eight Mile Lateral & Nine Mile l1PpR~~NT~~Ea1~tRIGABLEACRES Executed License Agreement Land Use Change Application RIVER FLOW RIGHTS -23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 NOTICE OF PIIBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on October 18, 1988, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of the Glennbrook Properties & Simida Corporation for a conditional use permit for NE corner of I-84 & Highway 69, 107 acres more or less, for the purpose of a Planned Unit Development-General for the development of commercial and light industrial uses; a more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office and is available for inspection during regular business hours. Public comment will be taken and is welcome. DATED this ~~ ~ day of October, 1988. Jac Nieman , City Clerk AMBROSE, FITZ(iERALD BCROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridian, Idaho 83842 Telephone 888J481 ~'''. `, i. ` • ~ W i~ ~ ~ ° ~ I I `'~ w w w H w 1 ( l l Iii l i l l l l l l l~ l l i l i !III ! w~ away ~~~ ~rt m~o ~ a~ ro ~ a a K r~ ~ m~ a w bo 3 a~x~~ x o rt o rt ~ rt a m ~ a~ o w w y ppErr m ~ OD f~D W ~ f~D O ~ ~ O HN N ~ ~ ~ ~ cfit hi ~ -~' W rt m (~D (~D H W O Gw+ ~ ~ O `:~ rnrt a ro~ ~aacEn N w w ~ ~ ro ~ K a ~ rt ~' ~ K K ~' m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t °~ ~ ~ m r a m ~s M Q, m ~ o n o ~ O N o o ~,• o ~ C - ~ ~ ~t tq W ~ $ ~ o rt ~ ~ C w ;y,.;, o ~t o~ a ro rt H rt~ E r°n ~ ~ a cr w w o w K-• w K o a i-n d o ~ W ~ ~ ••• H1 ~ W (xD W ~ A rN ~ fD a~ ~r x N o. ~ ~w ~ w ~ C ~ c~~i ~ ~ ~ o a-~ :r o o~ K rt ~ ~•! H ~ ~ ~ ~ w~' d b r°r ~ ~ y ~n~ w~ rt rt ~ ~ Cy ro o ts a ~'_' cwi :' ro ~ H 5 ~* orc d o ~ w a ~ ~ o m rt ~r~ ro ~ ~ byy ~n,•~ `~ ~ ~ HG7N c 'C (~D O ''C Z f~ • ~ C ... ~ -.; ~ ~ ago a+ H 00 ~ z c~ ~ g co .°, ~. ti ~ n N E ~~ ~~ ro ~ O a ~ ° ~ ~k~ z m c w ~ :o ~ w ° v`3i n ~ ~ ~ p ~° tsi w ~ G7 H ~ tli ~ ~ ,. a ~ ~ ~~ o~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ _ m ~ ~ o~ '~ o~ ~ ~ o d z rt O O p o~ A°i ' -~ O ~ ,~ ; ~' ~` ~ ~ ~~'~ ~ ~ o ~ VD ~' H ~ a ~ `r' ~ a ~ ti z ~ y o 3acnx 7d C ~ fD ct C!~ H a H LNTJ ~ ~ w m ~ E ~ C%J ~ N 7 1ro+ ~ ~ H H W fD ,_.* ~ ~ rt ~ ~ H ~ h 4 w Y ~ w d w cn ~' o ~~ .. o °' '~ ~ ~'' '~ o~ :; ~ rt ro ~ ~~ 4,. ~: ;_ :; _ :;, ,~ _~ ~, .~ 4 j~.:;~. r ~. - .. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing on August 22, 1988, at 7:30 o'clock p.m., at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho; that the purpose of said hearing is to consider the Application of R.T. Nahas Company of Idaho and Simida's for a conditional use to develop, as a planned unit development-general, a portion of the property located in i the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Interstate 84 and the Kuna/Meridian Road. The suggested and proposed uses are i i commercial, including retail, office, motel, and light '~ manufacturing, warehouse and distribution, and research and development facilities. The property is generally described as a ~ portion of the W 1/2, Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. Amore particular description ~ is on file in the City Clerk's office at City Hall. ~ i The public is welcome and comments and testimony will be ~ taken. I DATED this~~ day of August, 1988. i MBROSE, fZGERALD ROOKSTON ~orney~ end ounNlon 0. Box •Z7 idlen,IdNo B3B~2 st9888~81 Jack ~Niemanr~, City Clerk NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a special meeting on August 22, 1988, at 7:30 o'clock p.m., at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho; that the purpose of said meeting will be to conduct public hearings on the .Commission's own Application to amend the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, on its own motion to amend the Zoning Ordinance, and on the Application of R.T. Nahas Company of-Idaho and Simida's for a conditional use for a planned unit development-general. (See. associated notices of public hearings running concurrently with this notice.) The public is welcome and comments and testimony will be taken. DATED this'~-L° day of: August, 1988. '~ ~~ c~a-~'" Jack iema , City Clerk AMBROSE, FITZOERALD & CROOKSTON Attomeya end Counaelore P.O. Box 427 Meridlen, Idaho 83842 Telephone 8884481 ~`~5E- ;;>; :. ~~•; . eJAMES W. KISER ATTORNEY AT LAW 6406 OVERLAND ROAD (OVER.LAND AT PHILLIPPi) BOISE. IDAHO 83706 208 376-3100 ^ August 5, 1988 Administrator City of Meridian City Hall Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Application for Conditional Use Sirs: I write to you as attorney for Glenbrook Properties, a Nevada Corporation, and Simida Corporation, an Indiana Corporation, the joint owners of the regional shopping center site located in the Northeast corner of the freeway and Highway 69 in Meridian, Idaho. The following is the property owners application for a Conditional Use Permit for their entire parcel of real property. 1. Name, Address and Phone Number of Applicants: a. Glenbrook Properties c/o R.T. Nahas 20630 Patio Drive Castro Valley, CA 94546 415-538-9600 b. Simida Corporation c/o Barry Lindsey Melvin Simon & Associates P.O. Box 7033 115 W. T~Tashington Merchants Plaza Indianapolis, IN 46207 317-263-7051 2. Owner of Subject Property: See No. 1 3. Legal Description of Property: Attached hereto as Exhibit A-1. } ~~• #~ .~ ~ Page 2 August 5, 1988 _ 4. Proof of Ownership of Property: Attached hereto as Exhibit A-2 and A-3. ~~- 5. Description of Existing and Present Uses: The entire parcel has for a number of years been used and is still 4 being used for the cultivation of agricultural products. t .~ . ~, 6. Proposed Use: Applicant proposes and applies to the ~~ City of Meridian for a Conditional Use of the entire parcel as a °Planned General Development (PD-6)" as defined at page 18 in the Zoning and Development Ordinances of the City of Meridian enacted pursuant to Ordinance No. 430 and passed April 2, 1984. This '_`~" Planned General Development area would be developed as a Central Valley Corporate Park for the installation of a mix of uses, ~:~, including but not limited to the following: ~~.,,~ a. Light manufacturing of a non-hazardous nature. b. Warehouse and distribution facilities c. Research and development d. High density multifamily residential e. Commercial and retail f . Off ice space ,~ 4 ;' Y` g. Motels h. Public recreation i. Institutional uses j. Community facilities The entire parcel of real property will be subdivided into +. ~ variously sized parcels as tenants are secured and businesses n , obtained for construction of these various facilities. The ~~ proposed Phase I of the planned development is to construct the `~; ~ ~~ infrastructure (roads, sewers, water, etc.) necessary for the construction of a high-tech manufacturing facility in the Northeast quadrant of the property. Completion of Phase I will involve the construction of an approximately 52,000 square foot high-tech manuf acturing facility. '3 7. Characteristics: Because this parcel is approxi- mately 110 acres in size it is now suitable only for a mix of uses in a planned development area. The City of Meridian does not have x~ 4,.'''~:'. the population to support any one single use. Its location next to the freeway and its freeway access and its proximity to the city center of Meridian make it ideal for a mix of different uses. -~:r:. ~'; -~~ . . :. , .., . .. , t ,_ sf- .E] w Y. 4:V<, ,. - i f~ . .. ... ~1. '. 0 Page 3 August 5, 1988 ^ m 8. Vicinity Maps and Site Study Plan: Enclosed please find the required numbers of copies of the vicinity maps and a general site study plan as required by Ordinance 2-418-B.11. 9. Surrounding Property Owners Within 300 Feet: The list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject property is already in the City's possession. 10. Fee: Your Conditional Use application fee of $160 is attached hereto. 11. Lien: Glenbrook Properties and Simida Corporation, the owners of the property, pursuant to Ordinance 2-418-B.14, hereby grant to the City of Meridian a lien upon the property to secure the payment of all costs incurred by the City in regards to this application including engineering, publication and the City's attorneys fees. 12. Covenants or Restrictions: This application for a Conditional Use and the proposed Planned Development do not violate any subdivision covenants or restrictions or deed restrictions. inc rely, ~ J s W. Kiser rney for Glenbrook Properties Simida Corporation JWK: da cc: Mr. R.T. Nahas, w/o enc. Mr. R.W. Nahas, w/o enc. Mr. Barry Lindsey, w/o enc. Mr. Robert Jossis, w/enc. . `1 iI R ENGINEERS, 1» ~,,,,,,,,, ,,,,, , ,,~ ,,.,~ ~ ., .~ . „~.. , ., ., ,. ~,~ ,,,. ,~ , ~ Project: 14373 Date: April 13, 1984 CORRECTION DESCRIPTION FOR R. T. NAHAS - SIMON PROPERTY A PORTION OF THE W 1/2, SECTION 18, T.3N., R.lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO A parcel of land lying in the West half of Section 18, T.3N., R.lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the brass cap marking the Northeast corner of the said West half of Section 18; thence South 0°27'58" West 2,669.34 feet along the Easterly boundary of the said West half of Section 18 to an aluminum cap marking the Southeast corner of the Northwest quarter of said Section 18, also said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 0°27'58" West 1,346.03 feet (formerly described as 1,346.51 feet) along the said Easterly boundary of the ,west half of Section 18 to an iron pin on the Northerly right-of-way line of Interstate Highway No. 84N (formerly I-80N), Federal bid Projects No. I-80N-1(29)45 and No. I-80N-1(12)37; thence along the said Northerly right-of- way line of I-84N the following courses and distances: North 89°34'Z2" West 10.66 feet (formerly described as 10.73 feet) to an iron pin; thence North 67°46'17" West 53.85 feet to an iron pin; thence North 89°34'22" West 100.00 feet to an iron pin; thence South 73°43'41" West 104.41 feet to an iron pin; thence North 89°34'22" West 541.14 feet to an iron pin; thence North 85°33'43" West 641.45 feet to an iron pin marking a point of beginning of curve; thence Northwesterly along a curve to the right 654.14 feet, said curve having a central angle of 16°47'35", a radius of 2,231.83 feet,-tangents of 329.43 feet and a long chord of 651.80 feet bearing North 77°21'44" West to an iron pin marking a point of tangent; thence North 68°57'56" West 258.00 feet to an iron pin; thence leaving the said Northerly right-of-way line of I-84N North 33°44'00" West 65.93 feet Sformerly described as North 33°57'56" West 65.53 feet to an iron pin on the Easterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 69, Federal Aid Project No. 5-3782(1); thence along the said Easterly right- of-way line of State Highway No. 69 the following courses and distances: North 1°02'04"East 222.84 feet along a line 70.00 feet Easterly of and parallel with the Westerly boundary of the Southwest quarter of said Section 18 to an iron pin; thence North 1°28'25" West 228.51 feet to an iron pin marking a point of spiral; thence North 3°05'20" East 243.33 feet along a chord of a spiral to an iron pin marking a point of beginning of curve; thence Northeast- erly.along a curve to the right 317.28 feet (formerly described as 318.33 feet) said curve having a central angle of 16°44'25"(formerly.described as 16°47'45"), a radius of 1,085.92 feet, tangents of 159.78 feet (formerly de- scribed as 160.31 feet) and a long chord of 316.15 feet bearing North 15°39'17" East (formerly described as a long chord of 317.19 feet bearing North 15°40'56" East to an iron pin on the Northerly boundary of Government Lot 3 of the said Southwest quarter of Section 18 to an iron pin marking a point of ending of curve 60.00 feet right of centerline P.O.C. Sta. 445+13.10 (formerly described as 445+14.18) of said State Highway No. 69; thence leaving the said Easterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 69 North 89°42'17" East 27.50 feet .,. - ., .. ,~ ,. ~-. -.,.-, a, .. !r, - . ,, ;. ;; ~~', 7~~:~u t ~I-B ENGINEERS~u•. iatl South Heerhwnud Avpm~e. Sutln ~ - H~ut~r h C~~e Project: 14373 Date: April 13, 1984 Page: 2 - Correction Description for R.T. Nahas - Simon Property (formerly described as North 89°32'12" East 27.51 feet) along the said Northerly boundary of Government Lot 3 of the Southwest quarter of Section 18 to an iron pin marking a point of beginning of curve; thence Northeasterly along a curve to the right 2.89 feet'(formerly described as 1.84 feet), said curve having a central angle of 0°09'23" (formerly described as 0°05'57") a radius of 1,060.92 feet, tangents of 1.45 feet (formerly described as 0.92~feet) and - a long chord of 2.89 feet bearing North 24°42'52" East (formerly described as a lone chord of 1.84 feet beariny North 24°44'35" East) to an iron pin 85.00 feet right of centerline P.C.S. Sta. 445+28.43 of said State Highway No. 69; thence North 28°57'38" East (formerly described as North 28°59'18" East) 90.74 feet., 85.00 fee St uo theasterly of and parallel with the centerline chord of spiral to an iron pin; thence North 61°21'46" West 24.82 feet (formerly des- cribed as North 61°18'41" West 24.94 feet) to an iron pin on the said Easterly ~~ right-of-way line of State Highway No. 69 and marking a point 60.00 feet right of. Sta. 446+25; thence North 28°57'38" East 7.08 feet (formerly described as North 28°59'18" East 8.12 feet) along a chord of a spiral along the said .Easterly ,right-of-way line of State Highway No. 69 to an iron pin; thence North 89°32'12" East 200.36 feet (fonoerly described as 200.00 feet) to an iron pin; thence North 28°59'18" East 150.00 feet to an iron. pin; thence South 89°32'12" West 200.18 feet (formerly described as 199.70-feet) to an iron pin on the said Easterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 69; thence along the said Easterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 69 the following courses and distances: North 31°02'34" East 177.28 feet (formerly described as 176.12 feet to an iron pin marking a point of spiral; thence North 28°59'51" East 226.23 feet along a chord of a spiral to an iron pin marking a point of beginning of curve; thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left 339.87 feet, said curve having a central angle of 17°40'29", a radius of 1,101.74 feet, tangents of 171.29 feet and a long chord of 338.52 feet bearing North 16°09'19" East (formerly described as North 16°00'19" fast) to an iron pin marking a point of ending of curve; thence North 3°18'48" East 17.46 feet (formerly described as 18.44 feet) along a chord of a spiral to an iron pin; thence leaving the said Easterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 69 North 89°31'22" East 538.25 feet (formerly described as North 89°26'20" East 538_.23 feet) along a line 407.05 feet (formerly described as 410.49 feet) Southerly of and parallel with the Northerly boundary of the South half of the Northwest quarter of the said Section 18 to an iron pin on the Easterly boundary of Government Lot 2 of the said Northwest quarter- of Sectioh 18; thence South 0°40'03" West 109.00 feet (formerly described as 105.48 feet) along the said Easterly boundary of Government Lot 2 of the Northwest quarter of Section 18 to an iron pin; thence North 89°31'22" East 1,265.48 feet. (formerly described as North 89°26'20" East 1,265:49 feet) along a line 516.03 feet (formerly described as 515.94 feet) Southerly of and parallel with the said Northerly boundary of the South half of the Northwest quarter of Section 18 to an iron pin on the Westerly right-of-way line of Stratford Drive (fonaerly described as a certain County Road); thence South 0°27'58" West .818.42 feet (formerly ,. ,:. r {, .1; , .. ~~~ ~.I-B ENGINES S. ln~ : ~~ :,.,,~„ ~~,.,., ~W,,,.,~ „~~,,,,- ,.,,~~- ~ ~~,,,~,. ~,~,~~,,, ~~,;~ , r Project: 14373 Date: April 13, 1984 Page: 3 - Correction Description for R.T. Nahas - Simon Property 1 described as 818.56 feet) along the said Westerly right-of-way line of Stratford Drive (formerly described as a certain County Road), which is also along a line 50.00 feet Westerly of and parallel with the said Easterly boundary of the West half of Section 18, to an iron pin on the Southerly boundary of the said Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 18; thence North 89°42'17" East 50.00 feet (formerly described as North 89°32'12".East 50.01) feet .along the said Southerly boundary of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of. Section 18 to the point of beginning, comprising 107.03 acres (formerly described.as 107.05 acres), more or less. Prepared by: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. t:~;, ; 1 JTE/JDC/JTE/GLRcdp John T. Eddy, L.S. rb' t"~;,: F-aCiil LEGAL ~SCRIN71Usw ~ parcel of land lying in the 'test half of Section lU, Tonwsliip 3 Korth, Stange 1 East, Saise t°eridian, aaa County, Idar~a, and more particularly described as follows: p:eginainr~ at the. grass Cap csrrking titre northeast .corner cif the said :hest half of Section la; ti~ence South O'27'SEt'. tdest 2,665,34 feet along the Easterly boundary of the said hest Half ~ of Section lh to a brass cap rc~rklny the Southeast cc+rner of the igorthe~est cuarter of said Section 16, also sale; paint Deing the peal Point of 6egiRninc~; thence continuing South t?'27'5~' S~est 1,346.51 feet (formerly describer as l,3sZ.69 feet) alor~ the said Easterly boundary of the west half of Section 1~3 to an iron pin an the kartnerly right-of-gay line of Interstate Highway E.a. S4s31, .(formerly I-tOFi}, Federal R-id Projects ~:o. 1-oUFt-1(29)15 anct iio. I-St4~-1{ )z):17; thence alany the said l:ortnerly rigi~t-cf-way line of I-t~4h the follo~+iny courses anG distances: North 89'34'22' nest lii.73 feet to an iron pin; thence twrth 67'46'17• west 53.II3 feet to an iron pin; thence Borth 8'3'`34'22" ~~est lUt~.C,O feet to an iron pir~; thence South 73'43'41" nest 104.41 feet to an iron pin; thence Forth 59'34'[2` pest 541.14- feet to an iron grin; thence A~orth 85'33'42' Est 641.x5 feet to a~i iron pin marking « Noint of beginning of curve; thence Northwesterly aiQng a curve to the right b54.14 feet, said curve hawing a central angle of lfi'4/•35', a radius of 2,231.t~s feet, tangents of 325.4s feet and a long Chord df E51.60 feet bearing Korth 77'2]'44" nest to an iron pin aaarkinq a point of tar~gent~; thence worth 6S'S7'S6' tdest 2:~C.GG feet to an iron pin; thence leavins t~~e seia t~rtherly right-vf-way line of I-BaPi s~rth 33`5T'Sf," pest ti~5.53 feet to an iron pin on the Easterly right-of-gay line of State -~ighray too. b~, Federal Aid 1~ra~ect Mo. S-3Jti2(1}; thence along the said Easterly ri.,;ht of ,wal+ line C+f State i~ic~hwey loo. c9 the fol lo+eine~ courses nna d9stances: '+o.rti~ 1'u2`t~d" :.ast 272.F~4 feet along a 1 ine 7L.t7ti feet Easterly of «nc parallel with the 14est~erly batendnry of the So~rthwest q+,arter of said Section I8 to an ir~;n pin; thence North 1'28'25' 1~FSt 22&.til feet to an iron lain a~arkin~~ a point of spiral; t franc e worth 3'c~5'2(l" fast 243.33 Feet slang a cltoM of ~a s;~iral to a» iron pin ~ari;iny a ;,uint of reginning of curve; thencE r1ort~reasterly alone a curve to the right 31L.33 feet, said curve navinc a central argyle oi' 15'41'45", a radius of 1,OII5.92 feet, tangents of Ir~.31 feet anC a lonr3 c~rrt . of 317,1y feet uearie~q north 15'40'S6r East to a paint on tht Northerly Goundary of C,overnment Lat ~ of the solo southvaest quarter of Section I~ p°arking a point of ending of carve bO.L~b feet right of centerline P.C.C. Sta. 445+14.1II of solo State Highkay Fro. 6`~; thence leavinc the sai~.~ Easterly ri~~t~t-of-way line of State tiiah~ra~ ~~. ry Gontinufd rrn next ;-aye ,.. , i ,'e }3~, ~ (~ontin ~~~hPdule ~ aye ~ ,_„~ , ,- _ _ _ ... -._ _..~.~,..~..._._ _.. _. w .. ...._..... ~"~..._.. ..~._...._._ ll ~ I P-ti2111 LEGAL UCSG-clPTluw, cantinue~~ tyorth ~i9'42'17" East {formerly North t39'3Z'12° East) 27.51 feet (formerly described as Z7.S~ feet, more or less) along the said t~wrtherl~r boundary of s,overr~rent tot 3 of the Southreest apuarter of Section 18 to a Noint of '~~~ UeginninG of curve; tirence tvurtheasterly alone a curvQ to the right t.~ 1.84 feet (formerly described as 2.3 feet, eaore or less}, saia curve ~~ ~~ ~~ havitfg a central angle of 0'05'57°, a radios of l,Gfi0.92 feet, tangents of Q.92 fit and along chord of l.fi4 ff!et bearing 'forth 24•'44'35• East to a point of £SS.C~ feet right of centerline F.L.S. Sts. 445+Zt1.~3 of - sai,8 State 4ichway tdo. 6:~; thence htarth 28'y9' lii" East :~t.74 feet (formerly destritreit as 90.g feet -*ore or less) FtS.G feet southeasterly of and ~`~; parallel pith the centerline chord of spiral to a point; thence ~` North 81'15'41" best 24.44 feet (forr~eriv describes as tS.C feet, a:ore ar . u, less) to a point on the said Easterly right-of-way line of State ttignaay -~;~ No. 8u and a~arKi~~y a point br1,l~ feet. right of Sta. 44G+25; thence ~ t P~orth Z°'s?'13" East is.12 feet, alcrsg a chord of a s~ira) along Lhe rata <` Easterly ri~i~rt-of->Aay line of State tiighway No. 6~ to an iron pin; tnerue { l+orth 89'32'12° East 2tX~.ui, feet to an iron pin; thence ~ tlorth 28'S9'lt;" East 15i.(~v feet along a line Southeasterly of and parallel ~'`'1 Frith the centerline chord of spiral of the said' State t!ighway t`o. 69 to an iron pin; thence _4 South 8!?'32' 12" pest 199.74 feet to an iron pin un the said. easterly right-of-+~sy `,~: ~, ~ - line of 5t ate HighMay tin. ci9; thence along the said Easterly right-of-way line of State ~iiyhxay ~:o. 59 the following courses anti distances: `~Orth 31'G1'34' Esst 17t,.1Z feet to an iron pin markirtc a point of spiral; thence i•~orth 28'59'51" East 2tf=.23 feet al©ng a chord of a spiral to ~ iron f+in rrarting a ;:oirit of beginning of larva; thence ~~ortheasterly along a ~:_. "` curve to the 'eft 339.~i7 feet, saiQ carve i~avine~ a central angle of 17'4u'29•, a radius of l,lill.74 feet, tancer-ts of 171,29 feet and a ,:~,:', iovro chord of 334.52 feet hearing t~arth lti'~.19' ly" cast {formerly Describe-a ~~ ~ '"£~ as Piorth lE~';?0'i9" cast) to an iron pin raarkiny a point of endirsG of .curve; thence I iu~rtn 3'la'4~;" East 1;.44 feet along a ct~orn of a s;.~iral to acn iron Yin; thence leaving ttze solo Easterly right-c+f-r~a3 11rte of State ~iighv~ay too, b9 forth 49'31'22" East 53b.[3 feet (forcr.erly described as ~iorth E9'26'2Q" cast 53b.Z1) feet alone a line 4t~7.U5 feet (.formerly described }k~, as 41is.4y feet) Southerly of mna .parallel with fire Northerly oouneary °`' of the South Half of the horn+~rest quarter of the said Section 1£+ ~ "~ to an iron pin on the Easterly boundary of taverr~:+ent Lot z of the said ~ ~ . , ~ t~orthrrest cuarter of Section 1S; thence South C'40'L3" pest 1t39.UU feet (for~-erly descriCeci as 1U5.48 feet) along the said Easterly bounaary of 6overnmEnt i.ot 2 of the Northwest quarter - of Section 1~ to an iron ~iin; thence North t~4'3l'ZZ" East 1,2E~5.53 feet (formerly Descriped as i':orth ny'ZG'2u" .-'; cast 1.,285.45) feet along a line SiG.G3 feet (formerly described as ~15.g4 feet) Southerly of and parailQl witn the sain Piortneriy t~oundar} of the South half of the harthc~aest quarter of Section l8 to an iron pin <;~ ( en the ~.iSterlti runt of way line of a certain County ft~~a~s; tr+cr,ce cor±tin!~~ on r-ext race ,.,~ s.. ~. ' ~~ ,~ ti, . ;~ x ~ . ,~ ~ f' ..p~ a~ .. 'QZ, ~y, -. }:y , r . ~ _ .. .. .~E ~ „H --L WW~11 tii - - ; l.~ - :' ~. _~~ '~j~ ear •~ ~ ` Sq; ~, 4Z ~`~s ' ~ _ ~~. ~ r~ ~ ',~~ t: - .. ~ phi - ~ S~-~c9~ul~ ~-~ (Continued) LEi:+t GL•5~CR1NTit1~, cc-ntlnue4 South Q°21'58° test ~1~.Q1 feet (forc~erly described as ~1h.5~i feett alot-cf the saiQ ~ste~e;3y ric3ht of wry tine of $ certain Cocmt~~ iic,ad, which is also alonC a line 50.t~ feet i~esterly of and parallel with the saio Easterly boundary of the Est half of Section lb, to ~ iron pin on the Southerly boundary of the said Southeast quarter of tl~e Morth~st of Section 12; thence ~crth ~33'42'l7" East (fora~eriy ciescrit+ed as ~ortn X9'32'12" East) St-.t71 feet along? the said Southerly boundary of the SoutheASt quarter of the ~tortnorest ru.~rter Qf Section 12s to the ~,oint of h,~*c~inr.inq; ~ ~ QUIT CLAIM. DEED i For value received, GLENBROOK PROPERTIES, a~Nevada Corpora- tion, does hereby convey, release, remise and forever quit claim unto SIMIDA CORPORATION, an Indiana Corporat-ion, whose address is 115 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, . Indiana 47207, an uhdivided one half (~) interest in that r~`~ property located in Ada County, State, of Idaho, described on A'~' Exhibit A attached hereto, together with a],1 appurtenances, Date : /~ ~,,4~---- / ~/v . ,~ GLENBROOI~ PROPERTIES, A Nevada Corporation Ronald C. Nahas, President ;~;; '~i , STATE OF .CALIFORNIA ) ss '~~ COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ) y ~'~~ ~` On this 1Gth day of biay, 1984, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Ronald C. Nahas, known t~ me t~ be tht~ FreSidPnt of Glenbro~k Properties, a Nevada Corporation, the corporation that -; executed the a~ithin and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged `~1~1 to me that such corporation executed the same. ~;,< r~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official sea]. the day. and year in this certificate first ~~'°" _:;, ;~+ above written. ,~- _ , ,. .a ~ ~ ROBCRT~ EJCiIA'J No ar ub is ~ ' , ALAM.DA CJUNS'f ` r ` , ~ , C~,~_'•_' My Ccmm Espnes March 75, ! :P•~ , D~ r-,d. - ~>~;$~ iP:r.4:' _ .qr'~ - } _. - t,• ~:r .~?. - 6'~ ., - ~ Y! r ~~;: . .. Ik ~~~~.. .. ,~ ~~~~ .. 3 .. .. - - ~'`Y:. i t T - J: :, ~~.__ r<_. ~~~~ i r S~iedule "-' - (Continued r:3 ANT N0. P-02111 LEGAI GESCRIPTIOri A parcel of laid lying is the Ikst azlf of Section ld, Tohrsbip 3 i+brth, Rapge 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, IdaRo, and ~aore particularly described as folloMs: Beg4naing :t the brass cap narking the tiortReast corner of the said Hest hat f o1 Section 18; tl~enct South O'27'S8':. Pest 2,669.34 feet along the Easterly bow+dary of tAe said west isalf~'of Settles 18 to a brass cap narking the Southesst corr+er of the nortladest quarter of said Sectiaa 1S, also saia point Deiag the Real Point of Begiaatag; thence continuing South 0'27'58• i~ae,st 1,346.51 feet (fonaerlY described as 1,352.69 feet) along the said• Easterly boundary of tAt hest Halt of Bettina 18 to ap iron pia e~ the lbrt8eriy right-of-stay l iae of Interstate iiiglMray 80. 848, (fora~erl I-6aM.), Federal A/0 Pro~ezts lio. I-80s-i(29j45 and Ib. I-8~~1(1Z ~37; tAtace along tMe said lbrtaar l y r f gbt-ef-wy 1 ioe of 1-8411 tae let Iarfay carses agd di stances: Marta 89'`34.22' Pest 10.73 feet tv aw iron ptn; tt~eace Ibrt>r i7`4~'17• Best 53.86 teat to an iron pie; thence Ibrtb 89'34''Y2' Mast 100.00 feet to aA inns pin; tAeoce South 73'43'4i` best 104.41 tart to as iron pia; ti+ence lbrth 89'34'22` Yest 541.14 feet to aw iron pia; thence north 85'33.42" Best 641.45 feet to ao iron plA ranting a ~,oiat of beginning of eea~re; theate Mo~etMresterly along a curve to the right 651.14 feet, said curr-e hanieg a central angle of 16'47.35•. a radius of 2,231.83 feet, tangents of 329.43 feet and a loRO chord of 651.80 feet bearing Korth 77'2l'44• iksL to an iron pin markiAg a taint of tangent; thence Ibrth 68'57'SS• 11esL 258.00 feet to an iron pin; thence leaving the solo I~artMerly rtgAt-oT~ray line of I-l~lh tlorth 33's7'S6" i~test 65.53 feet to as ira+ pia on the Easterly right-of-~rsy line of State ltighwy 1io. 69, Federal Aid Pro~eGt Ib. 5-3782(1); thence along the said Easterly rigt-t of wy line. of State High~ray lro. 69 the fol inning courses and distances: north 1'02•'04• East 222.84 feet along a line 7G.~U feet Easterly of and parallel toith the ltesteriy boundary of t1,e South+~st quarter of said Section 18 to as tro+~ pia; thence North 1'28'25' ideal 228.51 feet to an iron pin o~arking a fiat of spiral; thence yorth , 3'05'20" .East Y43.33 feet along a mare of a sacral to an iron pin ®arting a point of beginning of larva; thence Northeasterly aior+g a curve to i:he right 318.33 feet, said curve having a centrsl eagle of 16'47'4S•, a radios of 1,08.5.92 feet, tangents of 160.31 feet and t long chord of 311.19 tit bearing north 15'40'56' East to a point os the Ibrtherly Doaadary of 6onernseat Lot 3 of the said Southi.est Quarter of Section l8 aartiag a point of ending of carve 60.0; feet right of centerline P.Q.C. Sta. 445+14.1.8 of said State Higl~vay fin. b9; taeace learrinq the said Easter 1 y right-of-vay l i ae of State Hi ghYa y ho . 69 continued oa aeact page ~~:: , r __ "[~ ~ ~ '~r~' z ;, .. t: I ' ~~ >~ledule A_Z - (Contin hortb 84'42']7` East (foroerly North X34'32'12• East) 27.51 fact ~foreerly described as 21.5 feet, core or less) a1oRq the said MortAe+rly bo~sdary of soreroeest lot 3 of the Ssotlwest gearter of Section to to a pofat et beginning of came; thence Ak-rtbeasterly along a cnnre to the right 1.84 feet (formerly described as 2.3 feet, wore or less}, said ewe ha~rieg a central sngle of 0'05'57•, a radius of l,Ob0.92 feet, tasgeets of 0.92 feet and a 1 ong choral of 1.84 feet bears nq Nbrtli N•44•35• East to a point of £ti5.00 feet right of centerline P.C.S. Sta. 443;231.3 of said State Mighray Ito. 69; thence ttcrrth 2&'y9' ln' East 90.74 fset (fonreriy described as 90.8 feet +rorr or less) 53.ti feet SOiRMlaStarly of and parallel rith the centerline chord of spiral to a point; EiNe~e Worth bi' 18'41• hest 24.94 feet (forwwly described as 25.@ Wit,., ~+e or less) to a point sA tits said Easterly right-of-ray live of State Bigaw,y Ib. 69 and •ariria9 a pvtet 60.0 feet right of Sta. 445*Y5; titrrce D4ortb Y8.59.18` East 8.12. felt a1oRg a chord of a spiral ajlNp tame said Etas~tars ly right-a,f-iray line. of State iltghray No. 69 to ao troe pia; North 89'32'12• East ZOO.oG feet to ~ iron pip; LhrACe North 28'39'18• East 150.OG feet along a lids So++tbeasterir of a~ parallet ritb the ceaterifae chord of spiral of the said Stan ~~ry No. 69 to as iron pia; thence South 89'32'12• Mast 199.70 feet co an iron pin on Lhe said Easterly r4~t-of-+ray line of State Highray no. 09; thence aioag the Bald Easterly rf~Ot-ot-ray line of State Highway sad. 6y the follariRg courses and distances: `+orth 31'G2'34• East 116.12 fzet to an iron pin marking a point of spiral; t hertte t~crth 28'59'51• East 226.23 feet along a chord of a spiral to as iron pia a~artcing a point of beginning of ct~rlre; tbeuce Mortheastarly atoa4 a cbnre to the .left 339.87 feet, sai4 cures haying s antral aeyle of 17'40`29', a radius of 1,101.74 feet. taegeats of 171.24 teat ana a ioag chard, of 338.52 feet bearing t+brth 16'09.19• East (for~erhy'described as north 16'JO']9" cast) to an iron pin markiny a point Of asding of Curve; thence tcortn 3'18'4&• East 18.44 feet alons a tt~ara of a spiral to an iron pin; thence leaving tt~ said Easterly right-ofway line of State. Highway ~• 64 Borth 139'31'22' EaSL 538.L3 feel (foraaerly described as AlDrth 89'2b'20• East 53b.29) feet along a line 401.85 feet (torearly described as 410.09 feet) Souther 1 y of arw parallel ri th the ibrtl+erly bosmdarr of the South nalf of the ~rorthrest quarter. of ts~e said Section. 18 to ar+ iron piss on the Easterly boundary of Govercuaent tot 2 of the said t*orthrest quarter of Section 1E; thence South 0'40'03' crest 109.OU feet (for,aerly described as 1x5.48 feet) along the ,said Easterly boundar,} of Governa+ent lot z of the Marthrest quarter of Section 13 to an iron pin; thence trorth 89'31'22' East 1,265.53 feet (fore-erly described ~ firth 89'26`2V' cast 1,265.49} feet glory a 1 ins 516.03 feet (forwerly ,described as 515.84 feEt) Southerly of any; parailei rith the said itortf,erly povndary of the South has f of tt~e ~rthwest gvarte~r'~'of Section 18 to en iron pin on the kesterly rignt ~f o~ay line of a certain County Roatl; thence contfnueri on next page f ~°G2111 ~' l ~chedule k-3 (Continu LE6Al. D£SCRIpTt~h, contlAUed . South O'Z7'S8' Best 818.41 feet (fors~erly described as 818.55 feet} along tNe satd Mestecjy rigAt of gray line of a tertaip County Road, rh cA 1s aiso along a 1 itie 50.00 feet l~esterl,f of and parallel with the Sato Easterly boundary of the !deaf half of Section 1$, to as troy pin on ttu Southerly bo~ary of the said Southeast quarter of tt~e l~or'thutst of SertioA 18; tt~ce Ibrtb 84'4Z' 17' East (forcer l y destMbed as fiortb 89'32' i2' East) 5~?.OI feet alouq cbe said Southerly bo~dary of tAe Ssrtresst quarter of the llortfi~est ~aarter of Section 1S to the point of be4~rlrg. .. ^ 1 ^ William_ A. Hon R and L. Hon P.O. Box 828 Boise, Idaho 83701 R~ert Hendren 0. Box 9077 Boise, Idaho 83707 ~`~~e Terteling Trust 4~7 ~ 1755 Westgate Drive Boise, Idaho 83704 Cycil A. Thomas ~~ „~P.O. Box 8204 ~ Boise, Idaho 83707 Grovel-J. Hawkins C1~Lr $. Hawkins and ~he Estate of Edgar T. Hawkins, dba G & H Enterprises Partnership P.O. Box 5837 Boise, Idaho 83707 J '`n Dobanan 5600 S. Locust Grove Meridian, Idaho 83642 eridian Bowling Lanes Inc. ~0 Laurelhurst Boise, Idaho 83705 Meridian Athletic Association Inc. P.O. Box 527 Meridian, Idaho 83642 State of Idaho m s C. McNaab 1542 Christopher Way Sacramento, Ca. 95819 ohnson Acres a Partnership ~{'~Attn: Dorothy Russell Secretary Rt. 1, Box 139 Star, Idaho 83669 ~, , enneth V. Johnson HC 33, Box 5104 Idaho City, Idaho 83631 J nson Acres a Partnership c/o Attn: Dorothy Russell Secretary Rt.l, Box 139 Star, Idaho 83669 s n, Dorothy, Amy, Perry Buyer: Law, Evam J. 725 S. Meridian Meridian, Idaho 83642 Errol T. Jorgensen Y~1012 W. Holland Avenue Nampa, Idaho 83651-1833 ^ I VICINITY MAP ~~:; ~~.: °° ,, MERIDII~T CITY OCI~OBIIt 18, 1988 PAGE # 2 Myers: I went out arxi looked at the site also and I think the street widening would be the best way to do the parking. Anderson: Maybe what we should do, is. go ahead and finish the building have a chance to watch it and then make a specific recam~endation whether we do the circle drive or widen the street. Giesler: Mr. Anderson, is there not funds enough to do that at this time now that we feel that the widen is the best way, are we able to go ahead and do that now, so it can be a done deal when we are all done so we do not have a problem with the traffic down there, I have driven down there in the lunch time and I can see some real traffic problem in that area. Anderson: I do not see it completed before we end 1988, no, I do see it being done during 1989, which fits our original agreelnPnt before 1990. Either way we do it the funding of it is not the problem, it is just what is going to accanodate the use the best is the question. Mayor Kingsford: The Council needs to make scaYUe kind of determination, we need to grant an approval because there is not adequate parking as is, it does not meet our Ordinances for parking, so whatever is the decision of the Council. Giesler: I would make the Motion that we ask the Cumber to widen that street rather than the circle drive, in that Notion we also need a time table, Nation was dropped. The Notion was made by Giesler and seconded by Tolsma to require the (~aanber to widen the street to acccamodate parking prior to the end of the season 1989. Notion Carried: All Yea: Item #1: Public Hearing: Conditional Use Permit for Nahas & Simon: Mayor Kingsford: Mr. Jossis would you like to ~ forward and be sworn: Bob Jossis, 11120 Potceriac Drive Boise, Jossis was sworn by the City Attorney: ::fi ~~ : ';.:; ~. ~~ r ; ~~ ".Y... _ ',~ { S.p s: Jossis: The project is basically as shown before ,Jossis had a copy of the prelimin- ary plat that has been filed and will cca~e before the P & Z CcamLission for Hearing on Nov~cibex 7 shae~ring the layout of the project, he explained where the roads and etc would be located. Mr. Jossis also had. a drawing showing the acxesses into the property off of Highway 69, we had a meeting with the Transportation Board and the Board did approve granting the acxess as well as one for the Ian property subject to relocation of the aoxess on the other side of the highway so it would be dixect- ly across from the acxess to the Nahas propertY• Since the meeting with the H~-ghway Board, I have met with the property owners across the street and they both agree that they would Like the access moved to match with the one on the other side. This would center the access on the property line between the two properties. We will be sul~itting to the Highway Board an application for the change by the Property owners across the highway from our project. The highway will be widened and have turnip lanes at the access points. Mayor Kingsford: I will now open the Public Hearing, is there anyone in the audience who wishes to testify on this matter? Elmer Kassens, 735 West Carlton, Kassens was sworn by the City attorney: Kassens: I have a question, is there any plan to connect fran the access off of Highway 55 on the west on through to Meridian Street? ' h ,S Z~ ~, 7 ~' ~~.:: €~~~ ~~ o - ~~ ~ITY OCZ'OHFR 18, 1988 PAGE # 3 t Jossis: As part of the Nahas development , no. This would depend on what the property '~ owners wanted to do with their property. Mayor Kingsford: Is there anyone .else who would like to offer testimony? There was no response, the Public Hearing was closed. The Notion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Myers to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as prepared for the Planning & Zoning Cattnission: Motion Carried: Roll Call Vote: Giesler, Yea: Myers, Yea: Tolsma, Yea: The Notion was made by Myers and seconded by Giesler to approve the Conditional Use Permit as requested in the Application by Nahas & Simco: Notion Carried: All Yea: Item #2: Public Hearing: Atieend[nents to the Zoning & Development Ordinance: Mayor Kingsford: At this time I will open the Public Hearing, is there anyone in the audience who wishes to testify on these amendments? There was no response, the Public Hearing was closed. The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Myers to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as prepared for the Planning & Zoning Commission: Notion Carried: Roll Call Vote: Giesler, Yea: Myers, Yea: Tolsma, Yea: The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Tolsma to have the City Attorney prepare an Ordinance to reflect the changes to the Zoning & Development Ordinance. Notion Carried: All Yea: Item #3: Erv Olen: APA, Update on Transportation Plan: Olen: One of the responsibilities of Ada Planning is transportation planning in Ada County, the last time the transportation plan was approved was in 1982 and a lot of changes have occurred since that time, what we are planning now is to update the transportation plan, look at what changes have occurred ail.make the appropriate update. Olen described the process that would be followed and asked that the Mayor and Council appoint a Committee to work with thegn on updating the Transportation Plan. Mayor Kingsford: I have a list of people who I want to talk to about serving on that Ccamittee and as soon as I have contad1-ed their and if they agree I will forward that list to you, I would like to ask Counci]man Tolsma~to head that up from the Council, is that alright with you Counci]man Tolsma? Counci]man Tolsma agreed to a be the representative from the Council: Item #5: T & R Construction: Fence on top of burns at Crestwood #3: Twayne Walker was present to dicuss this Matter: Walker: I guess we were supposed to have a Permit to build this fence. Mayor Kingsford: Well, there is more than that inwlved, the Ordinance does not allow anything higher than a four foot fence, we view that from ground level not burn level 1. N~RTDIAN PLANNING & ZONING SEPTII~IIt 13, 1988 ^ A Regular Meeting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Carmission called to order by Chairman Walt Nbrrow at 7:30 p.m.: N1e~nbers Present: Jim Johnson, Jim Shearer, Charles Rountree: Nlsnbers Absent: Moe Alidjani: Others Present: Wayne Crookston: The Motion was made by Rountree and seconded by Shearer to approve the Minutes of the previous Meeting held August 9, 1988 as written: Notion Carried: All Yea: The Motion was made by Shearer and seconded by Morrow to approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting held August 22, 1988 as written: Item #1: Findings of Fact & Conclusion on Proposed Amendments to the Zoning & Development Ordinance: Chairman Nbrrow: Any cxamtents or questions of the Carmission M~nbexs? There were none. The Notion was made by Shearer and seconded by Rountree that the Meridian Planning & Zoning Carmission hereby adopt and approves the Findings of Fact & Conclusions as prepared by the City Attorney on the proposed Amendments to the Zoning & Devel- ognent Ordinances: Motion Carried: Roll Call Vote: Rountree, Yea: Shearer, Yea: Johnson, Yea: Morraa, Yea: The Motion was made by Rountree and seconded by Shearer that the Meridian Planning & Zoning Catmi.ssion hereby reccameends to the City Council that the Planning and Zoning Camtission's proposed Amendments to the Zoning Ordinances should be approved and adopted: Motion Carried: All Yea: Item #2: Findings of Fact & Conclusion on request for Conditional Use Permit for a PUD General by Nahas & Simco: airman MprrpW; Any Celts or questions of the CarQrti_ssion Megnbers? Shearer: Does this corer the whole project or do they have to carte back for further consideration when the rest of the project is laid out. City Attorney: There are specifics in the Subdivision Ordinance that requires Design Review as well as filing of a Subdivision: The Motion was made by Shearer and seconded~Rountree that the Meridian Planning & Zoning CarYrrri_ssion hereby adopts and approves the Findings of Fact & Conclusions as prepared by the City Attorney on the request for a(imndtitii©nal Use Permit for a PUD General by Nahas & Simco: ~ ti~ _, ~x N~tIDIAN PI~ilVNING & Z o SEP~~ID~ER 1,3, 1988 PAGE # 2 Nation Carried: Roll Call Vote: Johnson, Yea: Shearer, Yea: Rountree, Yea: Morrow, Yea: The Notion was made by Rountree and seconded by Shearer that the Meridian Planning & Zoning CaYmission hereby recapends to the City Council of the City of Meridlian that they approve the Conditional Use Pern~it requested by the Applicant 'for the property described in the application under the conditions contained herein, specifically 11-9-607 of the Revised and Canpled~ Ordinances of the City of Meridian: Motion Carried: All Yea: Being no further business to cane before the Carmission the Motion was made by Johnson and seconded by Shearer to adjourn the Meeting at 7:40 p.m.: Motion Carried: All Yea: (TAPE ON FILE OF THF~SE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVED: `rh?i ~;'"° ~'. WALT MORROW, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: ~---- Ja , C Clerk ,,,. S , Y~ 2` _ . 1 :-i ;.; ,r; ~: ~~: ~~: ~; ,.. ~; F~ ~~ ~. ;k, _~; ,; ~ ,Y~.: ~',~ I I; ' ~'1...;-i T ;'. k.. ~~_~ r~ ~ f ~sROSE, ITZ3EMLD rr±, CpOOKBTON ~~..~ cou~lor~ 's ~.0. Box421 ~+d~, ~ R ~: -~~ ,;25 U BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GLENNBROOK PROPERTIES AND SIMIDA CORPORATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MERIDIAN-RUNG ROAD/I-84 MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The above entitled matter having come on for public hearing August 22, 1988, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., the Petitioner appearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian having duly considered the evidence and the matter, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That a notice of public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for August 22, 1988, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the August 22, 1988 hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio, and television stations; 2. That this property is located within the City of Meridian and is owned by the Petitioners, and is described in the application which description is incorporated herein; the property is in the Northeast quadrant of the intersection of the Runa-Meridian Road and I-84; Petitioners propose to develop the property in mixed use fashion containing both Commercial and Light Industrial uses as a planned unit development_general. 3. That the property is located in what is presently designated in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a Regional Shopping Center; that a regional shopping center is about to open in Boise; that it is likely another regional shopping center will not be constructed at the location; that the City has filed a petition to amend the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance to remove the Regional Shopping Center designated from the. location; that an initial hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment was heard on the same hearing date as this application. That the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning changes propose to designate the location as a Mixed Use Review Area which is the present designation of the other three quadrants of the intersection of the Runa-Meridian Road and I-84. 4. That the specific proposed comprehensive plan amendment reads as follows 4MSnos~, inaen~w :~oKSroa ~tmn~y..iw :ouna~a. '.O. Box 127 gnaw,, IdNo e~x ?ra~r~e essua~ -: ~ e ~~ MIXED USE REVIEW AREA EAST OF RUNA/MERIDIAN ROAD, NORTH OF I-84 AND SOUTH OF MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY AND STOREY PARR. ;~, : : ,< Y ;~,~ 1. It is the policy of the City of Meridian to encourage and promote the further development of the Meridian Road/I-84 Interchange into a full diamond or clover t~;', leaf interchange. 2. The City shall encourage the development of ;r~; Commercial, industrial, and technological uses in ;}~. this area and, even though the area is a mixed use, residential uses shall be discouraged. '~ `a 3. Development should be conducted under Planned Unit Development Procedures and as conditional uses, especially when two or more differing uses are - contemplated. ``~ 4 The character, site improvements, and type of ,~~ . development should be harmonized with previously developed land in the area and where located ,' adjacent to or near any existing residence or residential area, shall be harmonized with residential uses and all reasonable efforts shall be made to reduce the environmental impact on residential area, including noise reduction, traffic routes, air and water pollution. 5 Strip Development along the arterial and collector . streets included within this mixed-use area is not in ~~ ~c..`' ~ compliance with the goals, objections and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. - 6. Clustering of uses and controlled vehicular access points along arterials and collector streets should be encouraged." ``~ ~~ 5. That the specific proposed Zoning Amendments read as 4 &~ ' $ follows; 1. Amend 11-2-409 A, Zoning Schedule of Use Control, Residential, by placing after "Multi-Family Dwelling" and before "Planned Residential Development (PD)" the ;~~, following: "Planned Unit Development-General" and to °'~~' state that such is a conditional use in the following ,~ ~ districts: R-40, L-O, C-N, C-C, C-G, OT, TE and I. .. _ ;ton~n and ;ounabn O. Box X27 rldlat, td~ho &362 .:.~~ ~` ''> ~, :x>€~ 88N~Ot i I ~F~. .. .r .. .. . . -_ ~ `~ t - ,. i - ,k -. .. i, f ~ F ip. A,. 1- - ,~N~ .{ ,. ~ ;~ , ~~; `: a~ ~ ~~ki f~~: T . R ~. ,.. , ~~~ t: ,~ ~? .: ~~ : - >~eaose, ~rme~u.o :r+ooKSrow ~«mr..~ :~~«. o. eoxrr ~nan,, w.iw f:,Y~A~ 2. Amend 11-2-409 H, Zoning Schedule of Use Control, Commercial , by placing after "Planned Commercial Development" and before "Professional and Sales Offices" the following: "Planned Unit Development- General" and to state that such is a conditional use in the following districts: R-40, L-O, C-N, C-C, C-G, OT, TE and I. 6. That the location is presently zoned C-G. 7. That a planned general development is defined as follows: Planned general Development (PD-G) - A development not otherwise distinguished under Planned Commercial, Industrial, Residential Developments, or which in the proposed use of interior and exterior spaces requires unusual design flexibility to achieve a completely logical and complementary conjunction of uses and functions. This PD classification applies to essential public services, public or private recreation facilities, institutional uses, community facilities or a PD which includes a mix of residential, commercial or industrial uses. S. That the Zoning Schedule of Use Control does not presently contain a category for general or industrial planned unit developments; that there is a proposed amendment allowing a planned unit development general as a conditional use in the C-G zone; that the proposed schedule for the zoning amendment would allow the zoning amendment to be adopted prior to final action on this conditional use application. 9. That the property to the West is vacant ground, and residential and zoned commercially, the property to the East is vacant property and farm ground; the property to the South is k!y ~Yi,: l n~esAOS~, ~rmevuo :nooKero~ ~-«~,.~a :aumton '.O.9ox ~ ~rult~n, Mdw .~Nrnae~ai Interstate and Light industrial; the property to the North is farm ground and vacant property. 10, That proper notice has been given as required by law and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission have been given and followed. 11. That the property is presently farm ground and vacant ground. 12. That the Applicant has submitted petition signed by at least 75$ of the people owning property within 300 feet of the property indicating their approval of the use of the property as requested by Applicant. 13. That the. City of Meridian has been granted the right to receive community development block grant funds for sewer, water, and streets within the location. 14. That the City of Meridian does have control, guidelines and requirements for planned developments in 11-9- 607 and such are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. oMSaos~, ~noEn~o :HOOD nonwy.a~w :. e3e.x .s~.,~,~a~~ s s CONCLtJS IONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property and having obtained the consent of 75~ of the owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the applicant's property; 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to grant conditional uses pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and pursuant to 11-2-418 of the Revised and Complies Ordinances of the City of Meridian, Idaho; 3. That the City of Meridian has authority tv place conditions on a conditional use permits and the use of the property pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and pursuant to 11-2- 418 (D) of the Revised and Complied Ordinances of the City of Meridian, Idaho; ~.~; ~ .Y. '. ~'irG; ;r' `, :.~uF ;,~~; s <; ', ~, `~~: }~ `iv,,, ~: ~;: ~ s aMenos~, nzaeuuc :I~OKBTON «orMy~ oeb '.O. Box X27 art~lin, WxIW a'J812 ,:;a?wa ii8aiM31 4. That 11-2-418 (C) of the revised and Complied Ordinances of the City of Meridian sets forth the standards under which the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council shall review applications for Conditional Use Permits; that upon a review of those requirements and a review of the facts presented and the conditions of the area, the Planning and Zoning Commission concludes as follows: a. The use would, in fact, constitute and a conditional use permit would be required by proposed ordinances. b. The uses would be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan as amended, but the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, requires a conditional use permit to allow the use. c. The use apparently would be designed and constructed, to be harmonious in appearance with the intended character of the general vicinity. d. That the uses should not be hazardous nor should they disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. e. Plans for sewer and water service are in progress. f. The use would create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services, but such is deemed to generally aid the City and the use would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The use would not involve a use, activity, process, material, equipment or conditions of operation that would be detrimental to person, property or the general welfare by :,, ,i;; • • reason of excessive production of traffic or noise. h. Sufficient parking for the property and the proposed use must be provided. i. The development and uses will not result in the destruction loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. 5. That all development in the area shall be controlled and guided by design review, and shall be guided and controlled under 11-9-607, Planned Development, and shall meet all of the ordinances of the City of Meridian. 6. That it is concluded that the lack of specifics in the Zoning Ordinances for general planned unit developments was an oversight; that the proposed zoning amendments correct that. oversight; that the application would meet the corrected zoning ordinances as a conditional use planned unit development. 7. That the granting of this application would be in the best interest of the City. nt1e~, ~rzoe~uo :pOpKBTON ttaroaya and :otmaators .O. Box 127 nidlan, Idaho 898.2 essna 8B&41Qt ~~, ,, >:.r,; ~ri :~~ _ . ~;: << ~ ~;, r= ,~~~`'~ L' ~ ,~ ~ " `.k ;,~ , ' ~: f A ~~ :: 1 .,fi ,:r <" y " .:.~k F~•;; s e APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 4MBp08E, ITZGERALD :R001(BTQN uanyn end :ounMloa O. Box rZ7 flan, ld~ho 812 ;;aa t The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL Commissioner P,lidjani Voted Commissioner Johnson Voted Commissioner Shearer ~ Voted Commissioner Rounree Voted Chairman Morrow (Tie Breaker) Voted DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application under the conditions contained herein, specifically 11-9-607 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian. APPROVED DISAPPROVED ~--- -- , SPF7CIAL N~ETING OF Tf~ MQtIDIAN PLArIl~1ING & ZONING AUGUST 22 1988 Special Meeting of the Meridian planning & Zoning Canmission called tro order by C~aianan Walt Nbrrow at 7:30 p.m.: Members Present: Moe Alidjani: Jim Johnson: Jim Shearer: Charles Rountree: Others Present: Bob Nahas, Jr. Bob Jossis, Bill Hon, Joyce & Egan Law, Wayne Crookston, Itay BeLaY-eler, Laura Connors Item ~1: proposed Ametximents to the Ca~rehensive Plan: Chairman Nbrrow: The procedure on this will be to ask for any c~ients from the members of the Carmission and then a Notion will be needed that these proposed aanex~rnnts warrant further study and schedule a Public Hearing for the October Meeting. Is there any comments or discussion of the Ca~mission? There was no response from the Members. The Notion was made by Alidjani and seconded by Shearer that the amner~nents to the Con~rehensive Plan as proposed warrants further study and that they be scheduled for a Public Hearing at the October, 1988 meeting. Moticai Carried: All Yea: Item ~2: Public Hearing: Proposed Amerx~nents to the Zoning & Develognent Ordinance: ('~i _,~na„ Nbrrow: Are there any comments Eton the manbers of the Catmission? There were none, being no Garments Eton the Commission I will now open the Public Hearing. is there anyone in the audience who wisY~s to testify on these proposed amerxtr-ents? There was no response, the Public Hearing was closed. The Notion was made by Johnson and seconded by Rountree to instruct the City Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on the proposed aamer~ents to the Zoning & Development Ordinance. Matioaz Carried: All Yea: The Notion was made by Johnson and seconded by Shearer that the Findings of Fact and Conclusions show a recam-endation of approval by the Ca-'t-Y Corncil of the proposed its to the Zoning & Develogrpnt Ordinance. Notion Carried: All Yea: Item #3: Public Hearing: Conditional Use Pernut for a PUD-General for Nahas & Simoo: Chaiaman Nbrrow: Is there a representative here to make a presentation to the Cantrtission? Mr. Bob Jossis, Montgomery Engineering, 11120 Pofianac Drive, Jossis was sworn by the City Attorney: Jossis: Mr. Bob Nahas one of the owners of the property i.s here with me tonite,~i do not know haw much detail the Canaission wants me to go into here tonne as to what is planned for the property, as far as utilities and so forth. Chai.rmari Nbrrow: I think it would be best if you could give us all the information_/~Qu have without the spe~nfiQS as to site locations and etc. a .. - k'. f Apr >~i;.: ¢ ~i:. .. 0 0 1 ~~ PLA~ AUGUST 22, 1968 PAGE # 2 Jossis: I have here a drawing of the property in question wl'u-ch I will use to point out the aspects of the project. The property is about 107 acres site, the first phase of the develognPnt would include the ten acre parcel for the Ccmputrol location, the City of Meridian applied for and received a $400,000 eeonanic develognent blocJc grant to assist in funding the public improvements to help in locating Ca~itrol at this industrial , eamrercial park. C7a>tg~utrol will employ up to three hundred people within the next two to ~~Y period. ~e first phase public improvement in discussion with ACEID and the Idaho State Transportation we will be making some curb and gutter improvanents and side- walks at the entrance to the park basically widen out the highway so we can have five lanes, two in each direction with a turning lane, eventually as this project develops the continuation of that widening will continue on to the south to match up with sane plans the State Highway has for reworking the interchange intersection. The first phase of improvement of street project would be a dedicated right away from the highway to the C~anputrol site and then south along the east boundxy of their site with a culdesac tarn a round at the end of their site, that street would eventually go through to a street system to serve the additional property, water and sewer service are relatively close to the project site , sewo~x & water being in Stratford Lane, we world connect in at Stratford and bring the lines dawn the proposed street, sewer would be extended up to the highway and to the south end of the Canputrol project, likewise with water with the exception that the water would be looped back to the water tower, this would make a looped systan which was at the request of the City, interior sidewalks we are discussing with ACRD as far as the standard sidewalks that would be required, the developer will be having a jogging path throughout the park so we need to final out plans with that jogging path, pedestrian way sidewalks to cane up with an overall plan so we might not be looking at sidewalks along all the street. Drainage will be by imputing into Nine Mile Cree]c, we will do sane piping of Nine Mile Creek, we are meeting with Naa~a Meridian Irrigation on that as far as meeting their requirements. We would propose to file an initial subdivision plat for this parcel where woe would subdivide into various lots basically make our best guess to lot configuration that would be sold off in the future, there may need to be sore adjustment to sane lot lines, perhaps splitting of sane of these individ- ual lots depending upon what size lot was wanted by the purchaser. The reason for the P[ID in the first place is woe do not know for sure what type of industries and amnercial use would ultimately would cane into the park with the exception of Ca~utrol.so we want same latitude to work with the City as far as the ultimate street aligrmient, drainage system and etc. Nahas ; i~at we wo:wld like to have is a mix of uses here, I ernrision same oo[rmercial use such as a hotel, retail uses ,office uses, same clean light industrial uses and distri- bution type uses, we need as much flexibility in the plan as we can have because we really do know how much area to designate for each type of use, I think woe are going to have a very successful park, we have received several inquiries from different types of business. Alidjani: Why the 41 foot dedicated roadway? Jossis: The ACBD standard for street width in a oamtlercial or industrial area is 41 feet back to back of curb. Their standard in residential is thiiy six feet, we are~ocmplying with their ~~a*-~~ ~djani; _So an top of that would be the addition of the sidewalk or the jogging path? Jossis: Yes, this would be a dedicated sixty foot right away. . Johnson: Are cuing to get more explicit on the following phases at this point? Jossis: As far as what would be sulmitted with the subdivision plat? MELtIDIAN P & Z AC1C~7ST 22, 1988 PACE ~ 3 Johnson: Yes: \J C~ Jossis: The only thing that woe would be able to do, world be to show our current concept as far as the street patterns which would be sanewhat of a ring road and depending upon uses again as to the size of parcels that would be sold other connectors streets that would be needed beyond that I c1o not think we are in a position to show to much more detail as far as the actual lot lines in that area. We would plan from a utility stand- point hvwoever the entire parcel would be planned out initially so that woe would know that We could provide water, sewer and etc. to the entire parcel. S~atever goes into phase one would be sized capacity wise and location wise to service the rest of the parcel. Johnson: On the one drawing there a proposed restaurant-motel cxmplex and I asstme that is southwest? Jossis: Yes: Johnson: I have one other question and that is in regards to the City Engineer's oam~ents about connecting with Stratford? Jossis: The City Engineer wanted to be assured that here would be a second access into the property for emergency vehicles what is proposed is there would be a sev~rbd access in the future off Stratfood, the access off the highway would be the Primary access the first phase street improvement would shop short of Stratford and we would Propose to have sane sort of breakway barrier at that point, the rest of the street improveneait would be to maJce a all weather gravel surface to Stratford and then of course Stratford is already graveled, so woe would not at this time be proposing to bring this section and Stratford ~ to ACEID standards. Rotmtree: In regards to Mr. Johnson's question, the sixty foot right-a-way wou]-d still be dedicated but not extended? Jossis: That is right, in talking to ~C~ID though they may not want this to be a dedicated right away until such time as it is developed and oanpleted to their standards. however it would ~ into a reserve so that at such time the County wanted it it could be ded- icated. Rountree: You talked about jogging Paths and sidewalks, what do you have in mind, recreational facility for the complex out there or sanething for the oanrnuLi_ty? Nahas: It would be primarily for the benefit of the park, these days it seers those companies that are coming in the area look to have certain amenities provided for then such as you have out in the Park Center Development, we would plan on having jogging paths,, probably a small park area, maybe a health club facility, those kinds of things. They would be primarily for the people who are in the park. Rountree: Does the Corp of F~gineers or Idaho Water Resources people claim any jurisdiction wer Nine Mile Creek? - Jossisc The Nampa Meridian Irrigation District was going to check with the Bureau of R,BClamation as far as jurisdiction on 8 mile lateral, they did not irr7icate anyone else had jurisdication wer Nine Mile Creek except themselves. Oise provision that we would have to meet, when we pipe this creek ,the piping system would have to_be installed such that it continue to seYVi-ce subs<arfaee drainage, that is the ma5n p~urPose of the Nine Mile Creek, Pipe would be installed with open joints. Morrow: If the concept here is an industrial park,,I guess I would question why ACID wants sidewalks, is this sadething we are negofiating at the current time or is this? ~, ~~;, ~;~; ~:; i~i'a ~~ o e MERIDIAN P ~ Z A[~'T 22, 1988 PAGE # 4 ; Jossis: Quite frankly, we questiaied that to, it is part industrial, there will be same }~ a'F :~~ : - ~,, ~ oatmercial use also, what the ACFID is saying that even for the industrial users that sane of than may want to get up here if there is a restaurant or so forth, simply to go out in the noon hour and have score place to walk but this is sanething we are continuing to negotiate with the highway district, they have asked us to oo[ne back with a specific plan as to the location of the jogging path, how that would be incorporated into sore sidewalk system. ':` Y:,: Nbrraw: Is the oo~~oept here geenrally sanething, currently at the intersection of the Broadway Avenue interchange on the freeway, on the south side ,the south western corner ~ x, _~ you are dealing with industrial and ca:rnercial things there, now we are seeing where Grants Truck Stop used to be a motel , is this the type of develognent that you are basically planning, thinking of at this location? Nahas: We are looking at sanething more upscale than that, they do not have sane of the amenities that w+e are going to be providing, jogging paths. a Park, waterway, we are going .. ,'` to do landscaping all along the highway frontage. It will be sanewhat more upscale. -; Nbrrow: In Leans of a PiID, what imput does AMID have on the area inside the PLID? ~ . ~, ; 7 Counselor can you help us there? City Attorney: Depends on whether the PUD is going to be an Association where the developers retain the road right-a-mays, I a¢n sure you can have a PLID where you have dedicated public right-a-ways, i.f they are dedicated to the public then AC~~ takes `` ae care of than. , . Nbrraw: I guess that is a question I need to ask then. is quite frankly in this schare ~, ~; :: J,~ ~ of this project how do you envision the responsiblies for the jogging paths, sidewalks , roads and etc? What you are asking for here is a PUD, apparently you are going to make the roads public streets? Nahas: The roads will be public but the open areas will be maintained by the Associati~, everybody will pay dues every month that will pay for the maintenance of the landscaped ~~ area, j~3g~9 Fad arm so-forth. Nbrrow: If I this correctly, if ACEID says you put in sidewalks on both sides ~~hw ~~~ of all the streets essentially that is what you are going to have to do? Jossis: I aQn certain that is something wee would have to take up with ACFID Cannissicai, I do not think the staff would be reoannending that. Morrow; Being rio other questions of Mr. Jossis or Mr. Nahas, I will now open the public ,,.,.~i, ~earinq,is there anyone in the audience who wishes to testify on this matter? Mr. Evan Law, 725 So. Meridian, Mr. Law was sworn by the City attorney: - Law: The main thing I aan interested in right now is what is goi~ to happen as this coa:st- ruction is going an, of course I live directly across fran there and I aQn Interested in what is going to develop there, first of all we have right now at least one accident out there an front of .our place a mra:th, a lot of near misses, and at least oaie that has to be hauled away a month. It concerns-me as a citizen as this project is being built what .'t~ the additional traffic of trucks and equigrent will have to this effect. There is heavy traffic there in the morning and evening. I was worxlering what was going to take place ;. s. as far as 69, is that going to ranain a two lane on both sides, are they going to put ~ { >; ~, a sta~p light up there. Jossis: Pointed out on the map where the first phase entrance wool-d be and where the -~~ la+-cr Pnt,-anc~ woa~ld lie built as the project developed. The State Highway Departsrnnt haS ,~M; ~_. ~. ~::>. , . ~ ~.rr, - :.,- - .. ~ r p i i s ~ ~,1 ,.,.~.. . =' f.". - ~ .. ,.. . r .:. MERIDIAN P & Z AUC~7ST 22, 1988 pA~ >~ 5 plans for imprave~rent of this interchange intersection, they will be wiling out the ramp, a right turn lane off the freeway, a real right turn lane not like the one that is here now, the t for this develognent would be right now the street section for the highaaay 65 foot width curb to curb, edge of pave>laaPnt to edge of pavement, it has a four foot raised media in the middle so for this first aa:ess here this develop- ment would be required to remove the four foot media and put in a center left turn lane into the property, the State standard for a four lane road with the center turn lane is a sixty five foot width, so the existing wid~l is wide enough to acoarodate the left hand turn lane. The State along w2th ACEID have agreed that the requisenent for this project for the next phase is a deoellaration lane with would essentially be a right turn lane all the way from the exit lane off the freeway to this access. So you would have the two existing north bound lane and the right turn lane aloaig side of than. There will also be a left turn lane at the intersection of Meridian Road so that those vehicles wanting to turn left do not stop one of the traffic lanes. We will be putting curb ,gutter and sidewa]ks all the way fran the north edge of the Property dawn to the second acx:ess, from there they are not requiring us to put the curb, gutter and sidewalk. Also when this second access develops we w211 have a left turn lane there. Law: ~e other thing I was concerned about, I have been taking care of the irrigation ditch which feeds the whole section on the west side of the highway, I have been spending $60 to 100 a year in taking care of that, I was wondering before I spent the m~ey this year if you planned on doing something with that irrigation ditch so that I would know. Jossis: The regt>;~~ts of the Irrigation District on the project is that any lateral or water services that ecn~e of eight mile lateral, those its have to be protected woe may change the aligranent of a ditch from the lateral to the property line but from there on it will be the same. Law: I was wa~lering if you were going to be doing anything this year? Jossis: I do not have an answer for you, from where this ooci~e~off it will be in the second phase of the project. Bill Lion, 4850 Clark St, Boise, Mr. Hon was sworn by the City Attorney: Icon: We avn the property to the north and to the east of the proposed site, so woe are very much concerned with what i.s going on, Mr. ~ addressing Jossis & Nahas, I think woe are supposed to Dave a meeting here later where woe are going to get into this and you are going tell me how everything is going to work and we are going to have right- a-way into our property and things of that sort, is that true, at least that was planned that is what they told us at the State Highway Department when you were there. Jossis: The State reoaamerided that we get together with you. Icon: The way it looks right nvw, you are kind of cutting us 9ff where woe can not get into oar property from Highway 69. Nbrrow: Mr. Icon, would you address, your oamrnts to the Coimnission and then if there is ~a conflict between the taco properties we will try to address that. I~ioai: Is that ~eess off of Highv~ray 69 and existing access or is that a new access? Morrow: That is currently there. k ~'uii:.. r~r~: NISRIDIAN P & 2 ALX~ST 22, 1988 PA(.~ ~ 6 0 Hon: Then there is a right-a-way for an access road or a frontage road alo~ig side of Highway 69 mm~ing north to our property, which I ass>sne is planned in this. No one was f~¢niliar with this easenent. Icon: twat woe ~~ would like to do is have a new access to Highway 69 and that is what w+e are going to try to have, but at this point the State Highway poaoPle want us to work sanething with Nahas where w+e can share the entrance already therewith a front- age road ba to our property. I hope w+e can have the new access because we are going to be deali~ less with trucks than they will be although with this new proposal'~they are asking f r retail and office space to. Also the access to~the east they are block- ing off so t~4ere can not ever be anytie to the east~to get out to Franklin Road seems to me that d be public access, I guess they are spending Public funds, i.s it only being spent or w3~at I see outlined on the map or is it being spent for other things, i.s that a fair question? City Clerk: "hat is the estimated cost of what is outlined back to Stratford. Hon: It sew like sf=it.~public funds that,tt~at does make sense that they do go back to Stratford ~ - -- City Clerk: a also matching funds involved in this project. Han: It look) like an awfull lot of money for that road. I City Clerk: ~t includes sc-R,ioer & water ar~d utilities also. Hon: Utilities, sidewalks, bike paths . Morrow: Hike paths, a are not covered, just public utilities water, sewoer, street improvemeirts I ,curbs & gutters, sidewalks . Hoon: I do nod want to make a big thing about this the only thing I am concerned about is that woe e taken care of sane way in what happens out there and I think this is important, will be asking for the same thing they are shortly , we will need access into our property ,our funds it looks like our money for roads will all be private money, I doubt if there is any more block grant money available that would help any- body, so we ~re greatly concerned about where it goes and hoow woe do it . Alidjani: Ati,ths present time you are landlocked or clOo you have an access to your PmP~Y? Hon: We do ~ have an access except to go out to Frank]-in lid. We have not been able to get royal for another access off of 69, but we are still working on that, the plan fo the access fran 69 was done about 25 years ago, those days they thought it was going~to be a regional center and we had a Plan w2th the Nahas's for at least fifteen years where woe were going to put neighborhood shopping center on our grotu~d along with part of theirs and share that access off of Highway 69, well now of course we arse out of that business so with the different uses planned for the property I think it appropriate to have different access to Highway 69, that is w~,at we are hoping be able to do; if we can't woe need to have that present easanent for a frontage widened, I guess twenty five feet so woe could get same decent access into our prc'tpexty. Alidjani: Tn4~at part of Franklin does your road Dane aut? Hon: Stratford, next to the canetery. ,' ;~ I^ ,. ~~_ II ME[aDIAN P & Z ALX~tJST 22, 188 PAGE # 7 Shearer: Youhave property north of Papas abutting Highway 69? Hon: Yes, itl abutts up against the spee~dwaY ProP~Y• Rountree: Yogi are in the process now of requesting pPr*+~+; t for access? ~S Sj ~„ ;,.~,~: ~ ~, ~ R ,~' ~~ ~ 4``= ~.{: ~~ ~ "~~T ~4: .-~~-~'d ,; rt:. Y. Hon: Yes, wel are: Rotaritroee: Is that conditioned tapan the transfer of that facilitiy to Af.IID, when 69 and 55 is abar~do~ed? Host: I do knew, there was nothing said about that: Rountree: t might be an approach to take, as that will eventually be tinder Af,~ID's control. Youiare all the way through to Stratford then? Hon: Yes, woe, are to Stratford and then out to Incest Grove the other way. Rotantree: Y ~ mentioned the possiblity of an easement, is that your tastderstarxling that You had an ~sament? . Han: Well is a recorded easement along the side of Highway 69 that runs from the access road their property do~ast to our property and all the way down south to their next access A frontage road was planned when that highway design was done. Roaantree:, Do',you know whit right-a-way width was included in the easanent? Iioai: It was Itwerity five feet. Morrow: ?fie ~oad that is currently used oat the south end of the speedway for people access, than is not an approved acxess from Highway 69 currently? Icon: No, it ~ on our property asul it was a Glitch rider road at one time but improved by the y people, woe let than rase it to .get back to the other side of the speedways~k.cars for a lot of year and they also park cars to the south on our property.ere is no dedicated acxess there, at this time you can only turn right when you come of it because of the media strip there. Nbrrow: You scan access this property from Stratford Lane; at sane point in the future? Han: Yea: ~, Morrow: Your} concern right now, if I tanderstarid correc-tly is so smash accessing the back but dtaal acx~ess fr~an the front also? Hon: Yes, ~ have same retail prospects to use the space and we can not make adequate access, weust can not use than or they can riot use the property. Shearer: Y I mentioned this right-a-way for this frontage road. or an easement, is there an ea~. ec~ent recorded sane place? Hon: Yes, there is Shearer: from a t~echincal or a legal standpoint that should take care of any problems woe (have, you should be able too work this thing out w2thout affecting what we d0 Very muc1~. .. t _ If~: ~i.): - i~.yi;_.. .. ~: _ _ ^ i N~RIDIAN P & Z AUGUST 22, 1 88 ~;~.: PACE # 8 Han: It would limit our use with that narrow road. ~ Morrow: I d Like to ask Mr. Nahas in view of the points that Mr. Hon has raised for the lack of any presentation there, can you give us sore backgroiu:d on that ease- meet and who your Line of thinking is in terms of dealing with that easement? Nahas: At th~ present, I am not aware of that easement, it is not our intention to ~'°* land].ock Mr.IHon, I think it would be better if he could obtain his own access. ~' If that doesnot work out I am certain we can sit down and work sarething out. t~ Morrow: I it is imperative that woe protect or at least make provisions that there be sore nego'ti.ations go on to solve that problem for both because it is our best interest as a City to have Mr. Hon's property develop and have it develop very well and have it work very we,~l and it is also in our interest to have your properkies develop and work very well, ot~r interest is that we get the best possible projects that we can, so ig seen to me tat wfiatever your motions on it might be sought to reflect sane of that. Laura Connor, Johnson Acres, 604 West Broadway, Connors was sworn by the City Attorney: ,. _.„ Cocuiors: As ar as develognent lets go for it, w+e have a natural setup west of Highway 69, so if have a problem on hotel or motel site they can go under tree highway and on dean, woe ve set aside twenty five feet so he can go into Ten Mile, we are willing to work wi than ro we can get development out here, as far as Mr. Law's statement about he watper„these things can be worked out ,the only thing I want t0 say is lets t work together. 'f Nbrrow: Is t~iere anyone else in the audience who wishes to testify on this itan? There ' ~:`=~ was no response, the Public Hearing was closed. Z'he Notion wjas made by Rountree and seconded by Shearer to have the City Attorney ' prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on this request. Notion Carried: All Yea: ~, i ~e Notion made by Shearer and seconded by Alidj ani that the F; *~; *+gs of Fact -" reflect a r tion of approval by the City Cotmcil of the Corx7itional Use ~``'`~~" Permit r in the application: Nation Carr>red: All Yea: Being no fur{then business scheduled on the agenda before the Ca><mission the Motion was ;. ~' made by Alic~jani and seconded by Rountree to adjourn at 8:25 p.m.: s ,r Notion Carriied: All Yea: (TAPE CN FILE OF THESE PINGS) 7. ~..:: r;., I APPIX7VID: I _ . WALT MfJFtROW, C[~iIRMAN " J , ity Clerk `" ~ r i T Mayor Council File (3) p & Mail (3) A , ,Five, Police, Ward, Stuart, Stutzman Valley eras, Statesman, A®, NINID, CRH, ACC, Settlers Irrg. ,. 5. key .. ," . ~-: ~~'..._ S'r'i -. ..