Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMeadow View No. 2 (2)REQUEST FOR PRFLIMINARO AT: Planning and Zoning Commieon continued Page 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision features continued 11. What schools) service the area McR%DjV4y1 JR. g qk, do you propose any agreements for future school sites tY2, , Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the Plater Supply Fire Department , Other , Explain 13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination), RE�aI�► T� A L 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single family, Duplexes, Multiplexes, other 15' wLe Fawt►%-,?, Ze a Lot Lave Gimla FAaa►t.Y, 15. Proposed development features: �ooGG��olb a. Minimum square footage of lot(s), 5sMv 1=q2. SLC Lt LtNC', (�..1.F• S� b. Minimum square footage of structure(s), f 1a90 0 C. Are garages provided for, Yeev .square footage 400 d. Are other coverings provided for U14K.0owk . e. Landscaping has been provided for 15 �, Describe TZ:) P_e PR0UW0QD J�Y t -04e cwr4e2. f. Trees will be provided for ►.ip , Trees will be maintained r►U g. Sprinkler systems are provided for W9 h. Are there multiple units 90 Type remarks i. Are there special set back requirements Yrc, , Explain RcR ZE120 LC4- L►w'e, 4C*AeS FQrt•►T' ¢ ,eAR- X20' 1ceoI 4 S') j. Has off street parking been provided for , Explain 2 GA��t °z�h�@ Fba. eAc.N c�►►T k. Value range of property �s4�0 ?O Ipp,040 F?2• F¢oA- e 1. Type of financing for development LADCAL. (-*MCG Z ArA> FHAZI .oye". m. Protective covenants were submitted ��p , Date 16. Does the proposal land lock other property PID, , Does it create Enclaves VAD. STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. (2) i �k< a fE x, a a - i i LEGAL DESCRIPTION for MEADOW VIEW SUBD. NO, 2 A parcel of land lying in the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 1, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, State of Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the said Southwest quarter of Section 1; thence North 0024150" West 1, 323.80 feet along the Easterly boundary of the said Southwest quarter of Section 1 to a point marking the Southeast corner of the said Northeast quarter of the.Southwest quarter of Section 1, also said point being the REAL.POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 0024'50" West 664.65 feet along the said Easterly boundary of the Southwest quarter of Section 1 to a point; thence South 89039'50" West 402.16 feet to a point; thence North 1041'10" West 660.75 feet to a point on the Northerly boundary of the said Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1; thence South 89048120" West 910.81 feet along the said Northerly boundary of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1, to a point marking the Northwest corner of the said Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1; thence South 0011128" East 860.00 feet along the Westerly boundary of the said Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1, to a point; thence North 70000'08" East 132.73 feet to a point; thence South 89059'52" East 419.00 feet along a line Northerly of and parallel to the said Southerly boundary of the Northeast quarter of the South- west quarter of Section 1, to a point; thence South 75024'50" East 390.22 feet to a point; thence North 89035'10" East 100.00 feet to a point; thence South 0024'50" East 5.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the Southwest quarter of Section 1 to a point; thence North 89035'10" East 150.00 feet to a point; thence South 0024'50" East 320.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the Southwest quarter of Section 1 to a point; thence North 89035110" East 100.00 feet to a point; thence South 0024'50" East 84.29 feet along a line 60.00 feet Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the Southwest quarter of Section 1 to a point on the said Southerly boundary of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1; thence South 89059152" East 60.00 feet along the said Southerly boundary of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT Ditch and Road rights-of-way. PROTECTIVE COVENANTS RUNNING WITH LAND MEADOW VIEW NO: 2 Dated: May 1, 1979 Recorded: Instrument No.: This indenture and declaration of covenants running with the land, made this 1st day of May, 1979 by Roger Allen Associates WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, said parties are the owners in fee of Meadow View No. 2 an addition to Ada County, Idaho, as recorded in Volume of plats, page , records of Ada County, which property is located in Ada County, Idaho, and WHEREAS, it is the desire of said parties that said covenants be recorded and therefore IT IS HEREBY MADE KNOWN THAT said parties do by these presents make, establish, confirm and hereby impress upon Meadow View No. 2 an addition to Ada County, Idaho, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume of plats, page. records of Ada County, Idaho, which property is all located in Ada County, Idaho, the following protective covenants to run with said land, and do hereby bind said parties and all of their future grantees, assignees, and successors to said covenants for the term hereinafter stated and as follows: 1. The area covered by these covenants in the entire area described above. 2. No lot shall be used except for residential purposes. No building shall be erected, altered, placed or permitted to remain on any lot other than one detached single-family dwelling not to exceed two stories in height and a private garage. 3. No dwelling shall be permitted on any lot at a cost of less than $48,000.00 based upon cost levels prevailing on the date these covenants x-4 H se`s k i i I are recorded, it being the intention and purpose of the covenant to'assure that all dwellings shall be of a quality of workmanship and materials substantially the same or better than that which can be produced on the date these covenants are recorded at the minimum cost stated herein for the minimum permitted dwelling size. The ground floor area of the main structure, exclusive of one-story open porches and garages, shall be not less than 1350 square feet for a one- story dwelling, nor less than 1000 square feet for a dwelling of more than one story of a two story building. For zero lot line lots, the.ground floor area of the main structure, exclusive of one-story open porches and garages, shall be not less than 1200 square feet for a one story dwelling, nor less than 1000 square feet for a dwelling of more than one story of a two story building. No building shall be erected, placed, or altered on any lot until the construction plans and specifications and a plan showing the location of the structure have been approved by the Architectural Control Committee as to quality of workmanship and materials, harmony of external design with existing structures, and as to location with respect to topography and finish grade elevation. No fence or wall shall be erected, placed or altered on any lot nearer to any street than the minimum building setback line unless similarly approved. Approval shall be as provided in ParagraP4s I & 5. The Architectural Control Committee is composed of: Name Address Roger Allen P. 0. Box 1645 Boise, Idaho 83701 Ken Montee P. 0. Box 1645 Boise, Idaho! I83701 Alvin S. Marsden P. 0. Box 771 Boise, Idahp 83701 A majority of the committee may designate a representative to act for it. flIn the event of death or resignation of any member of the committee, the remain -,ng members shall have full authority to designate a successor. Neither the members of the committee, nor its designated representative shall be entitled to anyicom- pensation for services performed pursuant to this covenant. At any time, the, record owners of a majority of the lots shall have the power through a duly re- corded written instrument to change the membership of the committee or to w4.t'hdraw from the committee or to restore to it any of its powers and duties. 4. The Committee's approval or disapproval as required in these covenants shall be in writing. In the event the committee, or its designated respresentative, fails to approve or disapprove within 30 days after plans and specifications have been submitted to it, or in any event, if no suit to enjoin the construction has been commenced prior to the completion thereof, approval will not be required and the related covenants shall be deemed to have been fully complied with. 5. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under them, unless an instrument signed; by a majority of the owners of the lots has been recorded, agreeing to change said covenants in wh61e or in part, for a period of thirty (30) years from the date these covenants are recorded, after which time said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years. 6. No building shall be located on any lot nearer to the front lot line or nearer to the side street than the minimum building setback lines shown on the recorded plat. In any event no building shall be located on any lot nearer than 20 feet to the front lot line, nor nearer than 20 feet to any side street line. No building shall be located nearer tha;,i,5 feet to an interior lot line, except for those lots designated as zero lot line lots in paragraph 22. Zero lot line lots shall have a zero interior lot line setback for one side yard and a 5 foot setback lot line for the other. No dwelling shall be located on any interior lot nearer than 20 feet to the rear lot line. For the purposes of this covenant, eaves, steps and open porches shall not be considered as a part of a building, provided,however, that this shall not be construed to permit any portion of a building on a lot to encroach upon another lot. 7. Easements for installation and maintenance of utilities and drainage facilities are reserved as shwon on the recorded plat and over the rear seven and one-half feet and five feet wide along all lot frontages adjacent to streets. Within these easements, no structure, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to remain which may damage or interfere with the installation and maintenance of utilities, or which may change the direction Of flow of drainage channels in the easements, or which may obstruct or retard the flow of water through drainage channels in the easements. The easement area of each lot and all improvements in it shall be maintained continuously by the owner of the lot, except for those improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible. 8. No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried upon any lot nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or may become annoyance or a nuisance to the neighborhood. 9. No structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn or any other outbuilding shall be used on any lot at any time as a residence, either temporarily or permanently. Nor shall any building be moved onto the premises. 10. Any dwelling or structure erected or placed on any lot in this subdivision shall be completed as to external appearance, including finish painting, within nine (9) months from date of start on construction except for the reasons beyond control in which case a longer period may be permitted. 11. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lot except one professional sign of not more than one square foot, one sign of not more than five square feet advertising the property for sale or for rent, or signs used by a builder to advertise the property during the construction and sales period. 12. No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish, trash, garbage or other waste shall not be kept except in sanitary containers. All incinerators or other equipment for the storage or disposal of such material shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition. IM • 13. No individual water supply system shall be permitted on any lot. 14. No oil drilling, oil development operations, oil refining, quarrying or mining operations of any kind shall be permitted upon or in any lot, nor shall oil tanks, wells, tunnels, mineral excavations or shafts be permitted upon or in any lot. No derrick or other structures designed for use in boring for oil or natural gas shall be erected, maintained or permitted upon any lot. 15. No individual sewage disposal system shall be permitted on any lot. 16. No fence, wall, hedge, or mass planting, other than foundation planting, shall be permitted to extend nearer to any street than the minimum setback line, except that nothing shall prevent the erection of a necessary re- taining wall, the top of which does not extend more than two feet above the finished grade at the back of said retaining wall, provided however, that no fence, wall, hedge, or mass planting shall at any time, where permitted, extend higher than five feet above ground. 17. Lot area and width. No dwelling shall be erected or placed on any lot having a width of less than 60 feet at the minimum building setback line nor shall any dwelling be erected or placed on any lot having an area of less than 6000 square feet, except for zero lot line lots as defined in paragraph 22. The zero lot line lots shall have a minimum width of 50 feet at the minimum building setback line nor shall any dwelling be erected or placed on any zero lot line lot having an area of less than 5000 square feet. 18. Enforcement shall be by proceedings at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant either to restrain violation or to recover damage. 19. Invalidation of any one of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. 20. Keeping or raising of farm animals or poultry shall be prohibited. A11 dogs and cats or household pets kept on these premises shall be properly fed and cared for and shall be adequately fenced so as not to annoy or trespass upon the use of the property of others. Dogs shall not be allowed to run at large. Not more than two dogs and or cats or other pets may be kept at one time, except that a litter of young may be kept until eight (8) weeks old. 21. Parking of boats, trailers, motocycles, trucks, truck -campers and like equipment, or junk cars or other unsightly vehicles, shall not be allowed on any part of said property nor on public ways adjacent thereto excepting only within the confines of an enclosed garage, or behind fences taller than said objects, and no portion of same may project beyond the enclosed area. Parking of automobiles or other vehicles on any part of the property shall be prohibited except within garages, carports, driveways or other approved areas. The Architectural Committee shall be the sole and exclusive judges of approved parking area. Their decision is final and binding. 22. Zero lot line lots are defined as lots 1 through 13 and lots 21 through 37, Block 3, Meadow View Subd No. 2. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have affixed their signatures. I�� O/Z '►� C G�fJZCi/ Commission Meeting - February 21, 1980%Q Page 3 MAR 1 i980 4. 80-9-ZC - Single FamilyResidential - Discussion held concerning the area in general . an t e proposed pan. The Commissioners felt that staff comments are adequate. 80-8-ZC - Gale - Limited Industrial - John Joines explained the comments as prepared y staff. Discussion of the proposed development followed. The Commission directed the staff to comment that if the zone change is approved that the Highway District is recommending that Wright Street be improved to Ada County Highway District standards. The Commission agreed with staff comments. 80 -3 -CU - Condominium Units (136) - Discussion held concerning the area in general and the streets in the proposed development. The Commission agreed with staff comments. RIGHT-OF-WAY EXCHANGE -WISE WAY - Chuck Smith introduced Mr. Fredericks who is representing R. L. Adams and explained the right-of-way exchange that has been request The right-of-way as recorded was in error and they are trying to get the situation straightened out. Discussion of the area and the property to be exchanged followed. Chuck Smith to make sure the property that will be deeded to the Highway District is free and -clear. After further discussion Commissioner Wardle moved to proceed with the public hearings on the right-of-way exchange as presented. Commissioner Fairbanks seconded. Motion carried. BID APPROVALS Three Wheel Ftighdump Sweeper - John Joines presented the bids and recommended that the Highway District accept the low bid of Arrowhead Machinery with the diesel alter - hate in the amount of $42,447, and stated that the bid falls within the budgeted amount. Commissioner Wardle said that inasmuch as the staff has recommended approval of the low bid and that we are within the budgeted amount for the sweeper, moved that the low bid of Arrowhead Equipment in the amount of $42,447 be accepted. Commissioner Fairbanks seconded. Motion carried. Four Wheel StreetSwee eerr - John Joines presented the bids and said they came in' considerably higher than last year. He recommended that the sweeper with the gas engine be accepted and that the low bid of Western Road Machinery in the amount of $44,179 be accepted. After discussion, Commissioner Wardle moved that the low bid of Western Road Machinery for a four wheel sweeper in the amount of $44,179 be accepted. Commissioner Fairbanks seconded. Motion carried. RIGHT-OF-WAY EXCHANGE - EAST 46TH STREET - Chuck Smith presented a letter from Wm. B. .uckstep requesting a right-of-way exchange on East 46th Street. Mr. Smith explained the proposed exchange. Discussion held concerning the drain ditch in- volved in the exchange. Commissioner Fairbanks asked the staff to get the costs to the public in tri) exchange. He also wants to know what the property owner will be paying for and what the Highway District will be paying for. Commissioner Wardle moved to take the proposed right-of-way exchange under advisement asking the staff to get the cost figures together and to gather whatever information is available. Commissioner Fairbanks seconded. Motion carried. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Meadow View Subdivision No. 2 - Meridian Manor - Gary Funkhouser explained that he as received a letter from Bews and Smith, stating that they have concerns with a decision that was made a few months ago with regard to relocating an irrigation ditch. Mr. Funkhouser explained that in the one subdivision the developers dedicated the full 60 feet of right-of-way, so the Highway District allowed them to leave the irrigation ditch in the right-of-way, expecting the developers on the other side to relocate the ditch in their property. Discussion followed. Bews and Smith feel 0 0 sM1 ;:xe 'Commission Meeting - February 21, 1980 t Page 4 ��/f �� v 6,gwell 9 MAR 11 1980 F ` that the Highway District is being unfair in making them relocate the irrigation ditch outside the right-of-way because they are going to be required to tile the ditch by the City of Meridian. Discussion of the area and the problem followed. Bews and Smith will not be required to dedicate any right-of-way, only to improve their side of the street. Commissioner Wardle suggested that the developers work together to see if they can work out a reasonable solution. Further discussion. Commissioner Wardle suggested that Gary Funkhouser write a letter with a carbon to the other developer and suggest that they look at the problem from the most realistic approach, and that is cooperation, to see what they can work out. New Phone Numbers - Gary Funkhouser explained that on March 3, 1980, the phone numbers fort the Highway District will be changed. He explained that we are going onto the City Centrex system to save money. It would have cost about $18,00`to $20,000 to buy a separate system. He further explained that there will be a minor disruption on the third of March while the switch is made. Overtime Policy - Gary Funkhouser explained the problems that have been occurring in the overtime policy, which is now set for 8:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. He further explained that the majority of the employees are in favor of going back to the midnight to midnight overtime policy. Discussion of the problem followed. Commissioner Fairbanks moved that the policy for overtime in the personnel manual be changed to - 12:01 a.m. to 11:59.p.m. Commissioner Wardle seconded. Motion carried. Letter from Nelson Miller - Discussion held concerning comments in the letter insinuating that t e Highway District solicited a complaint from the Federation of the Blind with regard to the trees in front of the First Security Bank Building. Mr. Funkhouser said that the.insinuation is totally erroneous and explained how the the complaint about the trees was received. He further explained the background of the problem. There was a license agreement granted stating that if there is ever a problem the trees would have to be removed. Discussion followed concerning the footings in the foundation that are in the public right-of-way. Discussion held concerning the solution to the problem. Staff suggested that the Highway District deal directly with Price.Development. The Commission felt that the Highway District should proceed with whatever it takes to settle the problem and to stay with their original position. Edson Street Vacation - Commissioner Fairbanks said he feels that if the street is vacated that the park department should not be allowed to close it to through traffic since one property would not have access. ALDAPE GRAVEL PIT SITE APPEAL AUTHORIZATION - Chuck Smith asked for authorization to prepare tie draft appeal on the subject gravel pit site, to be submitted no later than March 29, 1980.Discussion held concerning the proposed requirements placed by the County zoning people. Commissioner Fairbanks asked the staff to go through all the provisions and then appeal it to the County Commissioners. If the County Commissioners deny the -appeal a decision can be made as to whether or not the State and the Highway District would want to go to court. Chuck Smith to draft the appeal for Commission approval and signature. FIVE MILE AND FAIRVIEW BYPASS MEETING OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS - Frank Capshaw explained that there was a meeting on the above sub ect. The Highway District laid out the ground rules and the limits of where that one way system could come in. Discussion held concerning the proposed bypass. Only one objection was received and that was because the roadway would have gone through his business. That problem s q. WE- yL' ,y f � 0 0 STEVEN W. HOSAC/eonluftin9 61vif ZnyinEzz 2128 NORTH COLE ROAD • BOISE, IDAHO 83704 The Honorable Joseph L. Glaisyer Mayor, City of Meridian 728 Meridian Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Meadowview No. 2 Subdivision Gentlemen: PHONE (208) 375-7100 18 January 1980 File 79.023 On behalf of Developers: Montee and Allen, we are pleased to submit herewith the Final Plat Application on the above referenced development for your review and/or approval. Attached please find the following required items: 1) Twenty-five (25) copies of the face of the Plat. 2) Ten. (10) copies of a 1-300 vicinity map. 3) Final Plat Application fee of $920.00 (Check No. 1019)• The Project's Design -Construct Plans have been revised and were resubmitted to the City Engineer's office on December 10, 1979, for final plan approval. As requested by the City Engineer these designs now include a layout that will enable the City to connect its existing sewers West of this area directly into the EDA constructed sewer trunk line. It is my understanding that the City's contingency requirements on the approval of the Preliminary Plat have been incorporated into this subdivision plat. Would you please notify our office as to when this application will be scheduled for the appropriate public hearings. If you have any questions and/or need additional data or plans please do not hesitate to call. MLM/jam Attachment Respectfully submitted, Steven W. Hosac, Consulting Civil Engineer _0Z_ 01z &/� .14;4A '0 Michael L. Milhollin, P.E. 0 ..q, 0 W k R .0 a 1-4 U) N - wm C4110C a��au�r\anx t w w m m m a o o' mfU ► N o m m 9 'ts En H O R+ a + N H. Gd H M F+ m bd H '�.y ro rt frti ]'' ^Ei w a _ w o m � b' cn rt(gyp N CLo G� 0 rt ro• �' m ,ray{ m O m O 0 m w O R+ 0 m 0 m rt N O h n N w N N E ro n LQ w H ►c m N• ::r m h N- m rt M N Ui H �' n 0 m i r1 A Fi. rOh H N m P. N o g C:N• i3 f07 H m N• (D 0 fn 0 N• U) m n U) o u rt H 0 rt H•• E rt 'i 0 rt m o a m to to w H w 0 wct A 0 O (D Rs F-4 rt E' ft H 144 0' ' H w N ro rt rt OOH C) H (n R+ a. a rt o� .O a H N x m m rt N P) EO z m n m w m P) 1� 7� W m rt N• W (A o m m H o a 00 :I:tr 1 H m R+ z N rat cn n r• p. 0 w• � a Qp1� �d G m r � W N cz sa O fmA rr i r mo N r) rt � mrt M o F° 0 z i °O Cl+n S o R. N C+a m O F, .0 a 1-4 U) N - wm C4110C a��au�r\anx t w w m m m a o o' mfU ► N o m m 9 'ts En H O R+ a + N H. Gd H M F+ m bd H '�.y ro rt frti ]'' ^Ei w a _ w o m � b' cn rt(gyp N CLo G� 0 rt ro• �' m ,ray{ m O m O 0 m w O R+ 0 m 0 m rt N O h n N w N N E ro n LQ w H ►c m N• ::r m h N- m rt M N Ui H �' n 0 m i r1 A Fi. rOh H N m P. N o g C:N• i3 f07 H m N• (D 0 fn 0 N• U) m n U) o u rt H 0 rt H•• E rt 'i 0 rt m o a m to to w H w 0 wct A 0 O (D Rs F-4 rt E' ft H 144 0' ' H w N ro rt rt OOH C) H (n R+ a. a rt o� .O a H N x m m rt N P) EO z m n m w m P) 1� 7� W m rt N• W (A o m m H o a 00 :I:tr 1 H m R+ z N rat cn n r• p. 0 w• � a Qp1� �d G m r � W N cz sa O fmA rr i a K m (A I En J IV ryJ� W Q ME .O H En H � ro P) z 0 N O z m 0 3 -1 m " W "a: 3 n w n � � w d � OD rt H (n N ° nj rt f]1 mo N r) rt � mrt M o F° 0 i °O Cl+n S o R. N C+a m O F, �5z4 a r m N a F, o -n f' x C+ S CD C -n o J. N J 0 "O a J C+ a a K m (A I En J IV ryJ� W Q ME .O H En H � ro P) z 0 N O z m 0 3 -1 m " W "a: 3 n w n � � w d � OD rt H (n N ° nj rt ^Y �5z4 C f' x 0 0 0 0 1-6 W m n 3 to 4 ro C ou do W ti r oo a m w a ft N• w w H. x �sr, (D P- 11 P- H- 0 M m m (D n H a �r m o w Q: H. w a rt 4 bi M rn . : m m rt H M :r ro rt W N rt m m (n M (1 n rr H. 5' m o m ES' rr (n rt m o o n ro N rt rt rt V M M C6 to H m m n G : W x x H ,'7' ��, F'• eC H. r) ro ro P. to �% F'• 7r M O' m LO F'• a m F' m m 0 a N r• ►J o w a m 0 m rt O K i N W W a £ W x rt rt N W m H H. m rt ro H m W x (CD H y �q 1- rt o h O O K p~p�� b• `� vNi E rOr O r0 H W N W N n C Q] a LQ m a r m to rt n Lb rt r• W W N a N N N O rNr rt' : d w 0 P. M 0 rtm �v h -ft' N O �^ o a w fi En rat : a M. 0' F -A ro N m ro a Wrt rt A W rt M a a rt 0' O a 1-4x m m rt N a N z m 0 m N N III t .I O LQ H "C w FJ O N0 C.J.. x ri r0 fD n EI) m rt N to O. N *z. , ��n M r+ � f ? O O O rt r f: o~i' O sZO tlH. N ►tN• ao a0 NF N 'J ro O a rt N ft r rt N r N a n a � (D a 0 m f, rt .I m o b F+ � m x N O En H Ili H .O 3 En m ;3 0 G o i < ti : a rt N O I� I� m O x J '.3• m N m M OD 11. ni w. m OA w cn OD M I Al rmr w m 0 C.J.. Ai ri n O CD to F+. *z. , m M r+ � f ? i0 O r f: o~i' O ao nc+ N N O QA a � (D a f, �• o o E -n t+ v "O O 'O N � -o C+ m o b F+ � m x N O En H Ili H .O 3 En m ;3 0 G o i < ti : a rt N O I� I� m O x J '.3• m N m M OD 11. ni w. m OA w cn OD M I Al rmr *z. , f ? r f: 6t 9 En O tl N• 0 O O a M's: x•2��aKc;. l< a 3 q0 L0 F✓ 41 Fj N. m r• T to • v. ►, O ." FV F _Acn [ N H H s 4 Me O t r y Y wf O O 3 ,w } •'On m ,a z CD t z gm fi r a cu 0, 2 WON€ t' g$ r En H Om r+ t M mm C -56 : 11 k ^fi ka �g`�Kk f5 ro En m rt 'v piv Irl O H. m U) c s; o Fl- m root e (D z k � k 4 K L4 d CL c moljG) � Wtirx� n O O a� n ►fDi n i 6t 9 En O tl N• 0 O O a M's: x•2��aKc;. l< L0 F✓ 41 Fj R m r• T to v. ►, O ." � i [ N H H s 4 Me O t r y Y cn O O 3 ,w } •'On m ,a z CD H z gm fi r 6t 9 En O tl N• 0 O O a M's: x•2��aKc;. l< L0 F✓ 41 Fj R m r• T to v. ►, O ." � i [ N H H s 4 Me O t r n• cn O O 3 ,w } •'On m ,a z CD H E gm fi r cu 0, 2 WON€ t' g$ r En H Om r+ t M mm C -56 : 11 k ^fi ka �g`�Kk f5 ro En m rt 'v piv Irl O H. m U) c o Fl- m root e (D z L4 d CL c moljG) � Wtirx� O O a� n ►fDi n FO n �' M C W N :3Imp `J G FH- " • 0 n EEn D H m� a I 44 o ro n rt h r• r• a a r a N a+ H W M m fD F -n a o n Fl m rt ro O• a h c m ro o• w m rt r ro m 4,rt a 4 a N r- • r . F ', r a rt rt E E fn m o. to N 74 a H rt rt H. rt � m rt rt d rmi O h a w H m M n G E: 0 F- :• x H C+• a' m J H. n PO toN• C U)O P. 7r rt K O+ a m LO r• a m w m E m 0 m w H o a o m 14 w� 0 m n rt 0 : n n cn rt 1-h r- uI ►� O En N n H. w (t 0 ( 0 plpy� n ri m o 00 rt O O m H ,q O N P) n :3 mw Ln C a ♦✓ V. 9 0 En � M - O Fp 0 H. m n ih r- n N• FJ U! p i1 m CP rt W J Lb a, W % t7 m a w rr o m W rt ct PI o `t �' ,. O H. rt m w H m a �aN m ft . ,"� o 1 r PI O a+ 1.4 rt N SII rar N p orn rd rt 8 a rt 10 Co Fl, I a rt rt O� . � o W tr yrt v `4 m F 6t 9 En O tl N• 0 O O a M's: x•2��aKc;. l< L0 F✓ 't Y R m r• T to v. ►, O ." � i [ N H H s 4 Me O t r n• cn 3 ,w } •'On m ,a z CD H E gm fi r cu 0, 2 WON€ t' g$ r En H Om r+ t M mm C -56 : 11 k ^fi ka �g`�Kk f5 ro En m rt 'v piv Irl O H. m U) c o Fl- m root e a0 z CL O O O a N 0 N rt a N H m� O CL a H O w m rt a Pi U! G •• m O m J C v (D tlOD r• w� o rot _ tl m a ,q O H d P) n :3 mw Ln a En O ED cu O i1 m CP rt C+ a M's: x•2��aKc;. 't Y 3 T v. i y� s 4 Me iv ,w } •'On gm fi 0, 2 WON€ t' g$ r t z Wit -56 : 11 k ^fi ka �g`�Kk f5 r .' i CENTRAL &TRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Review Sheet Rezone # Conditional use # �i� a�,l. •� 1��sro•s=�i a � 1/ ! eu) -- l.' We have no objections to this proposal. 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. Return to: Boise Eagle Meridian Runa — ACZ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal. 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. 5. We will require more data concerning the depth df (high seasonal ground water)(solid lava) from original grade before we can comment concerning individual sewage dis- posal. 6. We can approve this proposal for individual sewage dis- posal to be located (2,4) feet above high seasonal ground water, 4 feet above solid lava layers. 7. Wecan approve this proposal for: Central sewage _Interim sewage _Individual sewage 'and Central water _Individual water _Community water well $. Plans for Community sewage _Sewage dry lines, and Central w ter _Community water must be submitted to and approved by the Regional Health and Welfare Environmental Services Office. 9. 4, Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 10. This department would recommend deferral until high season- al ground water can be determined it other considerations indicate approval. 11. Review d iy; lba �<.sel 75 r 13. i--' VI, �rc 2r q� y k t �j���3 i1 S ^ d # T. Pip "IA'�mi4,� !ivm RRI < x€t Y SAWN 55g § X4? ` x dfraa` ¢ t u 6 r q r a` � ra M't 'iFi .sk A F i Y3 zi's`. w se Fx.: t A94,.. 4 "b 3 '� S ^1 f} h` Y �a+ s„ vat s , tl 41 sr m h+ x xr c� #IT Y t COUNTY SUBDIVISION EVALUATION PROPOSED SUBDIVISION NAME: PRELIM. As.a result of a meetin subdivision name is AND THAT THE FOLLOWING LFNAL DATE:2�,;, jq0o a . REVISED is agreed, that the approved DLUDW19W.r, nam 0-. 2, Nia-'Lea-u- 4. 1 uV0 6. Harp- is 0. r__ 8. 9. 10. ABOVE COMMENTS READ AND APPROVED BY: BOISE CITY PUBLIC WORKS: FIRE DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE: �-- ADA 'PLANNING ASSOCIATION: rl-dm�njI-- A k. 5 Y' a r� l AMENDED 1. ME 4 t, 5C.{J �7Yn' t. fS'�FAN$" 3 e� OFFICIALS LA WANA L NIEMANN, City Clerk, A. M. KIEBERT, Treasurer ROGER SHERWIN, Chief of Police BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN O. FITZGERALD, Attorney ROGER WELKER, Fire Chief EARL WARD, Waste Water Supt. A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 728 Meridian Street MERIDIAN, IDAHO ow Phone 888-M3 JOSEPH L. OLAISYER Maya Mr. Michael L. Milhollin, P.E. Steven W. Hosac/Consulting Engineer 2128 North Cole Road Boise, Idaho 83704 Dear Mr. Milhollin: January 17, 1980 Final Plat and Development Plans Meadow View No. 2 Subdivision Meridian, Idaho COUNCILMEN RICHARD C. WILLIAMS GRANT P. KINGSFORD BILL BREWER RICHARD F.ORTON, JR. DONALD L SHARP Chairman Zoning a Planning H Attached is the blueline print set of final design plans for the subject project that you recently submitted to me for review and approval. My comments on this set of plans are shown in red pencil. The appearance and contents of your plans for this are project are very professional and you are to.be commended. - Some of my comments on these review plans need to be reiterated here for the convenience of those people involved in approval of this project that do not have ready access to these plans. These comments, categorically, are as follows: A. Plat 1. 'It has been the policy of the'City to allow the showing of the 50 foot wide public street right of way on the plat along with a note stating that "All lots are hereby designated as having a permanent public utilities, drainage, irrigation and public right of way easement over the outer five (5) feet of each lot that is adjacent and parallel to any street that is dedicated to the use of the public." With this added note, the plat conforms to the subdivision ordinance requirement of a minimum 60 foot wide public right of way dedication. 2. The previous preliminary plat, prepared by Rees Engineers, showed two access roads to the Noteboom property from Delmar Drive. The revised preliminary plat submitted by Marsden & Associates, from which your final plat was made, eliminated the Easterly most access. It was a condition of approval by the City Council, during their regular 0 Mr. Michael L. Milhollin, P.E. 0 -2- January 17, 1980 meeting on May 29, 1979, that certain design changes, discussed at that time, be made on the final plat. One of the design changes requested by Councilman Dick Williams was that a public road right of way access be provided from N.W. 8th Street through the Meadow View No. 2 property to the Noteboom property to replace the easterly most one eliminated from Delmar Drive. I had misunderstood Councilman Williams design change re- quest as I mistakenly showed the location of the utility and street stub on your initial plan submittal. As you pointed out in your letter of December 10, 1979, the extension of utilities to the Noteboom property, as I had shoran them, would result in double frontage of the existing lots along the North boundary of the Cherry Manor Subdivision. The access, therefore, needs to be made through that parcel shown as Lot 1, Block 13 of Meadow View No. 2 Subdivision. This access is to be improved to include a finished roadway and utilities as you have shown for N.W. 11th Avenue. B. Streets 1. I assume that concurrence is needed from Nampa -Meridian Irrigation District for discharge of storm water drainage to Five Mile Creek. It has been my past experience that Nampa -Meridian has required storm water runoff detention and skimming devices to reduce sediment and floatables from entering existing drainages. 2. Responsibility must be taken by an agency other than the City of Meridian for maintenance of those portions of storm drain pipe that are not within public right of way boundaries. 3. Provide roadway through Lot 1 Block 13 for access to Noteboom property. See comments in Item A.2 of this letter. C. Water Distribution System 1. The City is experiencing problems in Meridian Manor #3 and Settlers Village with water meter tiles, that have their tops set flush with the ground. These meter tiles are filling up with ground water to the extent that in some cases, the water level is above the top of the meter. Because of the possibility of contaminated ground water entering the meter yoke and the freezing of the ground water damaging the meter, the City is instituting a policy, retroactive to include Settlers Village and Meridian Manor, to require that the bottom of the meter tile be set at the maximum anticipated ground water elevation. 0 t G §w 7 fr r 6 APPENDIX 1 (Added to Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions For Meadow View No. 2 Subdivision by Amendment dated February , 1981) 1.. Dwelling Units having a minimum floor area of 1,000 square feet or more shall be permitted only on the following Lots: Lots 2, 4, 6,.and 8, Block 14 Lots 3,-5, 7,-9, 24, and 29, Block 12 2. Dwelling Units having a minimum floor area of 1,100 square feet or more shall be permitted only on the following Lots: Lots 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, and 12, Block 14 Lots 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 19, 21, 23, 25, 28, 30, 32, and 34, Block 12 3. Dwelling Units having a minimum floor area of 1,200 square feet or more shall be permitted only on the following Lots: Lots 1, 11,'13, and 15, Block 14 Lots 1, 11, 12, 15, 18, 20, 22, 26, 27, 31, 33, 35, 40, and 42, Block 12 Lots 3, 5, 8,. 10, 12, and 14, Block 11 Lots 14 and 15, Block 10 Lots 9, 11, and 13, Block 7 Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, Block 13 4. Dwelling Units having a minimum floor area of 1,300 square feet or more shall be permitted only on the following. Lots: Lots 14 and 16, Block 14 Lots 13, 14, 16, 17, 36, 37, 38, 39, and 41, Block 12 Lots 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 16, Block 11 Lots 16, 17, and 18, Block 10 Lots 8, 10, 12, and 14, Block 7 Lot 18, Block 6 Lot 1, Block 13 Interim Policy Statement Subdivisions with houses less than 1,350 square feet in size can be approved after the City Council approves development plans that satisfy the following criteria: 1) Subdivision is fully improved. 2) A streetscape plan is provided. 3) Buildings must have staggered front yard setbacks. 4) Double car garages are provided. 5) Minimum building square footages shall be delineated for each lot. 6) City Council determines that the plans and project is in the best interest of the City of Meridian. ;.?,rs r Rc s' 4 4. zea � Ili AR x 1 k r Y q�. rhr, a� a it.A+.. w�2 r� .� ,LLQ 1 May 21, 1979 Roger Allen - 345-3500 ✓�/� �O P.O. Box 1645 Boise, ID 83701 !C 0 M M E N T S West of 8th St. & East of * d Meadowvi ew #1 /dIAlf5a°eA153//3 �7- 0:9 Meadowview #2 Revised Preliminary Plat ITEM: Pae 2 d g 19. Central District Health Department: 1) We approve proposal for Central Sewage and Central Water. 2) Plans for Community Sewage and Central Water must be submitted. 3) Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. �k '- Council ACCEPTED Revised Preliminary Plat, subject to the z. Recreati on"a�owance on the Five Mile Creek easement and to subsequent use of the Development Plan Final Plat; Bicycle paths to be provided for City to put in park; sewer and water e compliance. 20. APA - Meridian Fire Department: approves street names as listed. �R 21. Chief Sherwin: No objections. '# AT I. Bill Brewer: I cannot help but wonder if NW 10th St. should connect -80 north and south �n Delmar Dr. on the south. .,; . 2. Central District Health Department: Approve with Central sewage and Central - water. Plans for Community sewage and Central water must be submitted. k�,`a Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. r 3. APA: Subdivision name is OK. Chateau Dr. is OK. NW 11th Ave. is OK. Fai rwood Ct. is OK. Delmar Dr. is OK. NW 19th Pl . is OK. NW 8th Ave. is OK. `' ff4. Roger Welker: The Fire Department is still in opposition to the plat not providing for N.W. 10th to go on thru to Delmar Dr. The present plan makes it exceedingly difficlut for emergency � vehicles. The turn -around on N.W. 10th is not big enough for IP �E turn -around, as it is not 90' radius. }; P&Z APPROVED 2-11-80. Council TABLED 2-19-80. w WO_A A {' Counci 1 3-3-80 - no representation. Council'APPROVED with the condition that they come back to Council for street "seeping on any reduced square footage,that the City be deeded Lot 1 by metes and bounds, that the City Engineer has the review on the modifications of NW 10th Ave. Also variance of a public hearing. 3-17-80. �f "4 a � RWR t K x,JiSy"gy' n 2 y..y 3' s i �fiF''" .4"t•^XP'" 3 x r� G uw °s3aA5 : rF?_- p-, _n ' q 'ti , yrs $�.,Fz � 1'➢ iAt - _111a+vG '9dur #a, � .wA .4 + x s^ 4 �� S t,iox". ,, t �p s+W. x ,� a . -. ,• ;r .r .. '�. lie - = s t s ., uss_;. .. ...,..... _ .. _,..,., ,. ..-.. .., > ... v at...E..x. o �.b, ,. ....�..... .. ... ,. _. m, _.r✓rw �,r.a ..._ .. M EADOW VI EW NO. I e PRINTED 3-1z-80 FOR GATE ® REFERENCE C(✓ REVIEWAPF'POVAL CONSTRUCTION Xz2h STEVEN W. HOSAC VIP 01 Consulting Civil Enginccr 2129 MOlTH COLI ROAD "SE, IDAHO 93704 TELI►HOW t20% 375-7100 MERIDIAN MANOR NO. 3 VICINITY MAP MEADOWVIEW NO.2 SUBDIVISION MAR 17 1980 [L fE =T =T 4 nn DATE5q p —. tt•�J�J �(�/(�� JOB NO.�c ®25 ATTENTION RE: a 2. CsvvV IRE �r ERE 4F3. -r' .2 S 7 �2x FINE MINE! STEVEN W. HOSAC FINE MENFINE ♦v�OHalL�6il� G�tfILB�i/1�CHCEt MEJ 2128 NORTH COLE ROAD BOISE, IDAHO 83704 PHONE (208) 375-7100 s FINE { MEN TO FINE t� P11P J, I [L fE =T =T 4 nn DATE5q p —. tt•�J�J �(�/(�� JOB NO.�c ®25 ATTENTION RE: a 2. CsvvV IRE V ERE 4F3. -r' P Attached ❑ Under separate cover via Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Change order ❑ the following items: ❑ Specifications THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: V'*`For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS X le 49 z COPY TO SIGNED: FORM 240-2 Available from � Inc., Groton, Mass. 01450 It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at one ./ { a E IRE V ERE 4F3. -r' .2 S 7 �2x FINE MINE! FINE MENFINE MEJ FINE s MEN i FINE t� THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: V'*`For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS X le 49 z COPY TO SIGNED: FORM 240-2 Available from � Inc., Groton, Mass. 01450 It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at one ./ { a E l V 4F3. -r' .2 S 7 �2x { E l V .•t E l ? ! 1 $ .•t l r s i t� P11P J, I yR� 4 CENTRAL ST ICT HEALTH MAIN OFFICE 1455 NO. ORCHARD BOISE, IDAHO 83704 TELEPHONE 375-5211 Mr. John Bastida Ada County Recorder Ada County Courthouse P. 0. Box 877 Boise, Idaho 83702 RE: Meadow View #2 Subdivision Dear Por. Basti da : kPARTMENT Serving the ®Ec 21 1�?9 counties of ... . v December 20, 1079 Central District Health Department, Environmental Health Division, has reviewed and can approve the final plat on this subdivision for central water and central sewer facilities. No lot size may he reduced without prior approval of the health authority. Sincerely, Nancy Goodell Environmental Quality Specialist cc: James J. Jenkins, director of Fnvironmental Health Steve Hosac City of Meridian Farl Yard Ada County Ruildinn nenartment H S Department of HUD T� / November 7, 1980 � « �....�.�:w : � \ / Mayor Joe G alayer \ Meridian City Hall ` 728 Meridian Street \ Meridian, Idaho 83642 ma=r; Page Two November 7, 1980 Re: Meadowview Subd. No. 2 We appreciate the City Council's consideration of our request for the above and we will continue to cooperate in malting the City of Meridian and Meadowview Subdivision No. 2 an enjoyable place to live. Your consideration of this request at the next City Council meeting is appreciated. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Roger Allen Delta East Attachments s� 3` 0 m ,14 4� 5 ma=r; Page Two November 7, 1980 Re: Meadowview Subd. No. 2 We appreciate the City Council's consideration of our request for the above and we will continue to cooperate in malting the City of Meridian and Meadowview Subdivision No. 2 an enjoyable place to live. Your consideration of this request at the next City Council meeting is appreciated. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Roger Allen Delta East Attachments s� 3` 0 ,14 4� 5 d Y5� '1 }a , Meadowview Subdivision No. 2 Exhibit A Minimum Home Sizes for Lots Block 860 946/ 1032/ 1152/ 1248/ 1344/ 1512/ 960 1080 1188 1296 1350 1520 6 18 7 12,13 8,9.10, 104 & 11 10 14,15, 18 16,17 11 10,11, 2030495, 9,16 12,139 6,7,8, 14 15 12 2,5 3942,69 197,9,249 18,19,20, 13,14,15, 38 36,37 8910 25,26,27, 21922,23, 16,17,33, 28,29,31, 30,39,40, 34,35 32942 41,11,12 13 6217118,9, 2,3314,5 1 10 14 2,6, 3,497, 1,5 11,12,13 14,15,16 10 8,9 Total (5) (10) (14) (19) (28) (12) (8) Meadowview Subdivision No. 2 Exhibit B Front Two—car Building Entry Roof Setback Garage Color* Courtyard Color Block 14 Lot 1 20 X B X Dark Bwn. 2 22 X D X i1 3 24 X D X 11 4 26 X C X 11 5 28 X A X 11 6 30 X D X 11 7 28 X C X to 8 26 X, A X 11 9 24 X B X 11 10 22 X D X 11 11 20 X D X Block 12 ' Lot 1 20 X D X 2 22 X B X 11 3 24 X C X 11 4 26 X A X 11 5 28 X B X of 6 30 X C X 11 7 32 X C X 11 8 30 X A X 11 9 26 X D X " 10, 24 X B X 11 Block 12 Lot 18 25 X D X Black 19 20 X B X 20 22 X B X 21 24 X A X � 22 26 X C X � 23 28 X C X 24 30 X A X 25 32 X B X 26 40 X C X 27 40 X A X � 28 32 X B X 29 32 X C X It '30 30 X C X It 31 30 X A X It 32 28 X C X go 11 33 24 X A X 11 34 20 X B X No 35 25 X• D X 11 * (A) Medium Brown (B) Lt. Brown (C) Dark Brown (D) Celery Seed a • III STEVEN W. HOSAC G�oaeuetiny CivcB�'agineer 2128 NORTH COLE ROAD BOISE, IDAHO 83704 PHONE (208) 375.7100 n-i�=T* of uiumn- uzu-- GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU yvi"ttached ❑ Under separate cover ❑ Shop drawings ints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ _. ❑ Samples items: COP/IES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION de i THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: % V_ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted IMAs requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ 4t� bR BIDS DUE /� e�o , - -- - -- ----- -- -- REMARKS a?Y A ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 PRI TS RETU D. ER N -T-,US oel'm uml /zkz4 v►d - I. . - ' I - •- - - oca.Q flAo, urGC 1 14 ' �'�`�' -ANt o AA,5I�IW4 yoAW ___ - - __ noti once. " HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY 46 A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS LAWANALNEMANN City Clerk. CITY OF MERIDIAN A. M. KIEBERT, Treasurer 728 Meridian Street ROGER SHERWIN, Chief of Police BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. MERIDIAN, IDAHO JOHN O. FITZGERALD, Attorney 83842 ROGER WELKER, Fire Chief Phone 888-4433 EARL WARD, Waste Water Supt. JOSEPH L GLAISYER Mr. Dick Campbell H & K Contractors, Inc. 3655 Gowen Road Boise, Idaho 83705 Dear Mr. Campbell: Mayor April 14, 1980 Re: Meadow View Subdivision No. 2 Meridian, Idaho COUNCILMEN RICHARD C. WILLIAMS GRANT P. KINGSFORD BILL BREWER RICHARD F.ORTON, JR. DONALD L SHARP Chairman Zoning R Planning Please accept this letter as authorization for H & K Contractors, Inc., on behalf of the City of Meridian, Idaho, to install a connecting length of 10 inch diameter sanitary sewer pipe from the Easterly most existing sanitary sewer manhole in Chateau Avenue of Meadow View No. 1 Subdivision to the existing interceptor sanitary sewer manhole located at the intersection of Chateau Avenue and N.W. 12th Street in Meadow View No. 2 Subdivision. It is my understanding that your bid price to make this connection is Four Thousand Two Hundred Twelve Dollars and Fifty Cents ($4,212.50). It is understood that the scope of work for the above stated bid price is as follows: 1. Furnish and install approximately 144 lineal feet of approved 10 inch diameter sewer pipe. 2. Connect the easterly end of the new line, in a watertight and accept- able manner, to the existing sewer interceptor manhole in Meadow View No. 2 Subdivision. 3. Connect the Westerly end of the new line, in a watertight and accept- able manner, to the existing manhole in Meadow View No. 1 Subdivision. This connection will require construction of a new channel in the manhole base directing the flow into the new pipe. Also, it will be necessary to plug the existing manhole outlet pipe to a watertight condition and permanently grout fill that portion of the existing manhole flow channel that will not be used in redirecting the flow. 4. Patch all asphalt cuts made in Chateau Avenue, as a result of making the connection, to ACHD standards and approval. 4 w� } yW 'P { i a z 4 w� } yW 'P { i ft *fink Sp t n\i 4 w� } yW 'P { V so Mr. Dick Campbell -2- April 14, 1980 S. All materials, workmanship and testing shall be in conformance with -the City of Meridian Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Domestic Water Installations. The invoice for this work should be sent to the City of Meridian for payment and payment will be made upon City acceptance of the installation. If you have any questions, please call. SLerely, GaSmith, P.E. City Engineer GDS: dm CC: Mr. Earl Ward Mr. Richard Williams o • 7� Q ®'C�0 TrJi LZ A 5 C/Ad M72/y 70 r to o Tri ! — — _`k "®D T L®� T ,z.-:- 7� Alul fir® 04 X07 - PE -7 745 77i 6�1 T /r/V 1247 7' 41no , w 8�� is �y /�M p A57 OLD LOT S 2 Aal ,r t 113 REALTOR' National Relocation Service 208/336.3393 August 7, 1984 Jack Nieman Meridian City Clerk 728 Meridian St. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Jack: MLS 4720 EMERALD ST., SUITE 116 BOISE. IDAHO 83706 Meadow View subdivision #2 is currently experiencing what several subdivisions have experienced. The market is currently demanding smaller homes that are of high quality with new and appealing design. Large homes are not necessarily "good" and small homes are not necessarily "bad". There has been a drastic change in small home designs in current years as the old four walls and "box" look are out. Currently Meadow View Subdivision #2 has several 900 to 1000 square feet homes with some single and some double car garages. According to the Covenants and Restrictions and the Zoning and Develop. Ordinance, we would currently have to go in at 1100 and 1200 square feet homes and build some double and some single car garages. We, in order to sell homes in the area, purpose the following changes: 1. Require double car garages on all the remaining homes to be built. 2. Change the square feet requirement to 900 square feet minimum. Furthermore it is our intention to build quality homes with attractive designs and pleasant street appeal as we know the market demands this. In Sunnybrook Farms there are currently several double car garage homes that unless one closely inspected each one it would be difficult to -:notice the difference between the larger and smaller homes.:. Please call me if there are any questions on this matter. ,1 t r � 5 � 4 z n k c tt� ,r t 113 REALTOR' National Relocation Service 208/336.3393 August 7, 1984 Jack Nieman Meridian City Clerk 728 Meridian St. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Jack: MLS 4720 EMERALD ST., SUITE 116 BOISE. IDAHO 83706 Meadow View subdivision #2 is currently experiencing what several subdivisions have experienced. The market is currently demanding smaller homes that are of high quality with new and appealing design. Large homes are not necessarily "good" and small homes are not necessarily "bad". There has been a drastic change in small home designs in current years as the old four walls and "box" look are out. Currently Meadow View Subdivision #2 has several 900 to 1000 square feet homes with some single and some double car garages. According to the Covenants and Restrictions and the Zoning and Develop. Ordinance, we would currently have to go in at 1100 and 1200 square feet homes and build some double and some single car garages. We, in order to sell homes in the area, purpose the following changes: 1. Require double car garages on all the remaining homes to be built. 2. Change the square feet requirement to 900 square feet minimum. Furthermore it is our intention to build quality homes with attractive designs and pleasant street appeal as we know the market demands this. In Sunnybrook Farms there are currently several double car garage homes that unless one closely inspected each one it would be difficult to -:notice the difference between the larger and smaller homes.:. Please call me if there are any questions on this matter. ,1 t � T r n k c tt� i S ,r t 113 REALTOR' National Relocation Service 208/336.3393 August 7, 1984 Jack Nieman Meridian City Clerk 728 Meridian St. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Jack: MLS 4720 EMERALD ST., SUITE 116 BOISE. IDAHO 83706 Meadow View subdivision #2 is currently experiencing what several subdivisions have experienced. The market is currently demanding smaller homes that are of high quality with new and appealing design. Large homes are not necessarily "good" and small homes are not necessarily "bad". There has been a drastic change in small home designs in current years as the old four walls and "box" look are out. Currently Meadow View Subdivision #2 has several 900 to 1000 square feet homes with some single and some double car garages. According to the Covenants and Restrictions and the Zoning and Develop. Ordinance, we would currently have to go in at 1100 and 1200 square feet homes and build some double and some single car garages. We, in order to sell homes in the area, purpose the following changes: 1. Require double car garages on all the remaining homes to be built. 2. Change the square feet requirement to 900 square feet minimum. Furthermore it is our intention to build quality homes with attractive designs and pleasant street appeal as we know the market demands this. In Sunnybrook Farms there are currently several double car garage homes that unless one closely inspected each one it would be difficult to -:notice the difference between the larger and smaller homes.:. Please call me if there are any questions on this matter. ,1 t 9 o t Meridian Cid Hall 3. Item #2 Cont'd, Conditional Use Permit, Public Hearing . . . . . . . . . . July 6, 1982 Mr. -Kennedy questioned if the new procedure requiring Findings of Facts and Conclusion. of Law h6d to be followed, since they had applied for the Conditional Use Permit before the statute in the law went into effect. Wayne Crookston explained that this is a procedural change in the law and would become effective to all things pending. Item 3 Public Hearing - First Church of Christ; Locust Grove, East Pine Annexation Mike Anderson was present representing the request by the First Church of Christ for annexation of their property located at Locust Grove and East Pine into the City of Meridian, to be zoned "D" Industrial. - Anderson: "We purchased this property in 1977, prior to the Comprehensive Plan, after Which we found it was probably not the best place to build a Church." "We were advised by the Planning and Zoning that yes., we could build a Church there, but it would probab be in an-industriAl area. We then proceeded to find another piece, which we did buy out on Cherry Lane. Now we end up property rich and cash poor." "We can't build a Church building until we sell the property. To sell the property, which is contiguous to -the City, immediately the first question that comes up to a purchaser is, is it in the City?, and we have had to say no. It is in agreement with the Comprehensive Plar "We would ask that the property be annexed into the City for the purpose of selling it.' Mayor Glaisyer: "This is a Public Hearing for the annexation of the First Church of Christ property located at Locust Grove and East Pine. I -will now open the Public Hearing for comment either pro or con from the public concerning this annexation." There was no public response. Mayor Glaisyer: "There being no Public response, I will now close the Public Hearing." Mayor Glaisyer: "Are there any questions or comments from the Council?" 'There were none. The Motion was made by Brewer to approve the First Church of Christ Annexation with "D" Industrial Zoning. Kingsford: "Bill, we have the same thing, Findings of Facts and Conculsions of Law here Brewer: "That's right." "We have to back clear up again." "Ok, back up then." The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Orton to direct the City Attorney to prepai the ,Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in reference to the Annexation of the First Church of Christ property, and direct the Ordinance to be prepared. Motion Carried: Brewer, yea; Orton, yea; Tolsma, yea; Kingsford, yea Item 4 Meadow View #2 - Square Footage Requirement Variance Tom Birch was present representing Sherwood and Roberts the owners of Meadow View #2. Birch.` "We would like to propose to the City Council that a,chango size be allowed on the unit, dwelling size." "We would like this sowescanrafforrdato build some house that people can get into." "In doing so, we would also require some stricter energy guidelines." "What we would propose to do, is reduce the minimum square footage of the homes by 100 square feet." "900 Feet would be the minimum size." "We would also propose that the architectural control company be allowed to assign the lilts. As it stands now, the lots are assigned and it is set to which lot has 1,000 square feet, and which has 1,300 square feet." People that have tried to build houses or design houses have found some specific examples where that does not work, or makes it very difficult to comply with that and build on that lot, making it somewhat unbuildable." Meridian City Hall 4. Item #4 Cont'd, Meadow View #2 - Square Footage Re( July 6, 1982 ement Variance . . . . . . . . . . Birch: "Also, it is our understanding th,., as it stands, every lot has to have a two car garage." "What we would like to propose, is that we have a minimun of 70% with two car garage." "It would be the duty of the Architecutural Control Committee to assign that 70% two car garage, 30% on odd lots and different lots to have single cars." Mayor Glaisyer: "Have you discussed anything with the neighbors out there?" Birch: "We sent out the required notices." Dan Cada, President of Energy Saving Homes, Inc. addressed the cost of the homes. Cada stated that the average cost of the homes was $55,000 and that they (Energy Saving Homes) has 9 homes in the Meadow View #2 Subdivison pre -sold. Cada stated that they expected to build between 20 and 40 homes within the next 90 days. Kingsford: "Ordinance Number 383, we have a City Ordinance that paragraph 7 says "If an owner or owners of a subdivison desire to have this section apply to their subdivison, they shall come before the City Council with an amended plat showing each lot and the minimum size house that can be built thereon clearly shown; so they would have to come before the Council with an amended plat, or we would have to grant a vaiance to this Ordinance." Birch: "I think that is what we were asking. That is why we were asking for a variance, so that we could sign that mix. " Mayor Glaisyer: "Vern, (Vern Schoen; Building Inspector) do you have any comments at this time?" Schoen: "No comments." Orton: "Then you would be asking for three variances? For the reduction on the mimimun square footage, a variance on the two car garage requirement, and you would be asking for a variance on the geographical designation." Birch: "That is correct." Mayor Glaisyer: "Gary, (Gary Smith; City Engineer) do you have any comments to make at this time?" Smith: "No Mr. Mayor, I don't." Mayor called for any other comments from the City Department Heads. There were non. Mayor Glaisyer: "Wayne, (Wayne Crookston; City Attorney) do you have any comments to make at this time?" Crookston: "I'm not quite sure of this procedure they have gone through. You require them to send out notices within 300 feet?" City Clerk Niemann: "Certified mailing and public notices." Crookston: "Again, I think it's one of those deals that has to have Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, but's that's up to the Council." Mayor Glaisyer: "Is there anyone in the audience that wishes to make comment as to this variance request?" Meridian City Hall 5. I .J1111/ 6, 1982 Item #4 Cont'd, Meadow View #2 - Square Footage Requ -ement Variance . . . . . . . . . . Dale Babcock: "The registered letter that we got addresses the change of lot size. I guess that is one of my concerns. It does not talk about change of house size. This particular subdivision has all ready been decreased in size once." "I'm concerned about my property value being that I adjoin them." "My recommendation would be not to do that." Joe Simmnich: "I own property North of this subdivision, and I am concerned whether or not that these houses will be grouped, small houses in one area, and larger ones in another since there will be no designation. Kingsford: "I think that is something that I would like to see before it be adopted too. Gene Kindred: "I am in the area of this also, and I think that there is an Ordinance to go by, and it's been plated, and surely all those lots will take the size house that is was intended to be built on them. I am very opposed to decreasing the sizes of the houses in the City of Meridian. I don't think those smaller houses will be to desirable especially in our neighborhood. I think we should go by the Ordinance and not a variance." Gordon Leishmann: "I have the Cherry Lynn Subdivision and I am faced with somewhat the same.problem as Mr. Cada. I have built eight houses in there in the last three months, I have seven of them sold, but I can not build and sell a house over 1,200 square feet, I can't find any buyers for it." "I have lost sells where people want to pick a house and a lot together." "I am just basically here tonight to see how they do, because I plan to come in and ask for a variance to house size also." Dave Healy: "We are buying one of the lots out in Meadow View." "The way the house sizes are now it makes it affordable for us." "In this day and age, anything higher in square footage than that puts it out of range for the middle income individual." "The reduced house size provides people an opportunity." Steve Michales: "I am from Capital Plumbing. I do some of the plumbing in the area here. I think that we should give Dan (Cada) every consideration that we can. He is trying to put together a product that the public can use, also jobs for the local ecomony." Mayor Glaisyer: Are there any more comments or questions from the Public?" There was no response. "Dan (Cada) would you like to step forward and address some of the questions that were raised?" Cada'explained that the reason that they are asking for a variance to lot designation is so that they can get a good mix throughout the neighborhood. "Our only chance to build a quality home, to build an energy efficient home, is to lower that square footage. "We want to build something that people can be proud of." Councilman Kingsford questioned Vern Schoen, City Building Inspector, on what the water table at Meadow View #2 was. Schoen.: "It runs about 17 inches." Councilman Orton: "I would like to find a way to support these requests to get the housing market moving again in Meridian, it is a big part of our economy." Councilman Kingsford: "We have two or three subdivisions that I can think of, that were approved prior to our having any minimun square foot sizes. Those builders could build anything in there that they would want. No building is taking place there either." It bothers me to throw it open entirely to a smaller house, when in fact there are areas in Meridian where they can build that don't have those square foot requirements." ""There are places in IMeridian where they can build 900 feet or less, and they are not building." City Hall 6. July 6, 1982 #4 Cont'd, Meadow View #2 - Scuare Fa tage Requirement Varian( . . . . . . . Councilman Brewer: "I don't feel that just because they aj doing it one place really has anything to do pith it." "These homes certainl, n't low income homes." "I think that the name of the Canp,,ny - Energy Saving Horne: s a good description." Megan Morgan: "I am representing t_�ergy Saving Homes." If nk the fact that we have 9 signed ernest monie,.1 tonight_ and several more on th, rd speaks for itself. There is finally a quality product, one that anoaers the e, problem that the entire nation is faced with. That product was only relea& the public less than a month acro." "The product : ,[,,eaks for itself." " "The people willing to buy. You have 700 vacant and sittin(I lots in TMeridian, not being us, cause the product, number ,one is not there, and numb,�r two, your size limitations. ty must be the trade-off for the reduction of size.' "Until now, the product has n en available that answers the markets' needs." Kingsford: "But then, how do you guarar:tee quality?" Morgan: "The closest thing short of a law, or ordinance, covenance. If you will look through the amended covenance that we have drawn up, ✓ill see that the energy requirements are stricter than any that I &m aware of on i l . " Brewer: "If I remember right, that's the �erY thing we w( ying to do; a trade-off of reduced square footage for quality." other problem that I -have is the notice _1 Counci]snan Tolsma questioned the consumer 1 ro Lection clau: at states the homes are covered by a 10 year homeowner warranty. footage requirements Cada explained the homeowner warrEinty program in. detail. 2 on File) Birch: "I don't want to mislead i.he Counc 1 on this. Th re Dan's (Cada) Energy Efficient 111omes. They are the merd_er of th house Council ch is every bit of what he said it is, there is the possif)lity that some of the 1 ay be sold to some people that are not under that. We are I)repar_ed to require a wa y, a written warranty program, on those properties too." "The wry things are g now, our intention is to try to have Dan (Cada) build out the su bdi_vision. " The Motion was male by Orton to grant a v,riance to Meadc w #2, allowing the minimum square footage on each unit to be dropped 100 sT -eet. Crookston: "I think that we are in the a�_ea of Findings pct and Conclusions of Lava on this." "The other problem that I -have is the notice _1 lays "lot sizes"." LaWana Niemann, City Clerk: "The notice speaks of the s, footage requirements ordinance that speaks of the homes alone." There was discussion concerning the wording of the.notia 'ape on File) Crookston: "I think that the notice is probably defecti Orton: '"What is the solution to that prublem?" Crookston: "Go back and re -notice Brewer: "Why was this form used begin with LaWana?" Niemann: "I just used Wayne's (Crookston:) form. It is e same subdivision. When they (Meadow View #2) came in in Feb. of 1981, Wayne dict blic Notice for the squas'-e footage requirements on each lot. It wasn't chat the lot sizes, it was . . . 6` Meridian City Hall 7 Item #4 Cont'd, Meadow view #2 - Square Footage Rec cement Baria Niemann, Cont'd: " . . changing the square -)otage requiI as being that Ordinance that states so man\ ill be so ma not the lots. This is the one we did, and just worded Orton: "I still can't believe that there anything pro, in readvertising the subdivision. Therefor L would like if I can get a second." The Motion was seconded by Brewer. Crookston: "We still have the problem with the Findings 'Law. Unless you want to hold a special meeting, it is go next meeting until you can act." Kingsford: "We are not talking about a zoning or a condi that law, it only applied to a changing of the zone of th. Crookston: "It's under the Local Use Planning Act which bflzyor Glaisyer: "Variances in zoning, or building?" Crookston: "I think that you would probabLy have the sane zoning or anything. You are acting in a (.aiasi-judicial t question, or whether it's somebody corning in to put - i Al Tikker: "You are still going to get th,2 same people here tonight that are going to come back again. The othe tonight." July 6, 1982 Ls we always speak of aare feet - the homes e very sante way. " ve or useful to be done otion to stand, and see ,t and Conclusions of D be at least until your L77 use. As I understand 1. II to variances . " >lem whether it is whether it's a zoning -uit stand." te subdivision that are they cared would be here Brewer: "'e definitely want to have thing.3 right." "Thc t be a way to expedite things. These people want to build rine hames. They she building, and not waiting for the snow to fly." "I hate to -3ee us spoil tY, :�r going through possibly uneeded routines." "Is there any way Wayne, do you have al here that you could make reference to, to know for sure one way or the other this having reprieve to the variance itself?" Crookston: "Yes." Brewer: "I would like to ask for him (Crookston) to have Crookston was excused from the Chamber for research purpc Mayor Glaisyer: "Let's go on to some other things while Item 5 Bills Statement No. 6, from J -U -B Engineers, Inc. for Hud ProjE of $556.04. This was an Interim billing for administrati services, and inspection services provided in connection Community Development Block Grant Sewer Services Line Rel. No. B -81 -DN -16-0001. The Motion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Tolsma t billing, Statement No. 6, in the amount of $556.04, payai B -81 -CN -16-001, Sewer Rehabilitation Fund. Motion. Carried: Kingsford, yea; Tolsma, yea; Brewer privilege." is researching this." presented in the amount vices, engineering Fie City of Meridian ztion Project, Grant ove the J -U -B Engineers n the I -?UD Grant Orton, yea Meridian City Hall 8. Item #5 Cont'd - Bills . . . . . . . . . The bills were read. The Motion was made by Kingsford rnd seconded by Brewer t Notion Carried: Kingsford, tea; Tolsma, yea; Orton, The Mayor called a recess at 8:4( 1).M. The Meeting was called back to ox 12r by !,,iayor Glaisyer at Item #4 Cont'd - Meadow View #2, Square f )tage Variance . . . . Mayor Glaisyer asked Attorney Crc 1;ston to report on his July 6,1982 he bills be paid. Brewer, yea P.M. ngs. Crookston: "Since we do not havE a zoning ordinance, th( nances that we do have that pertain to this, have to be ne ordinances that gov( ming and lot sizes, the - - coverage on those lots. I think jiat you are doing is-gz ng a variance from those - ordinances, so I think that you ti ald have to have the nc quirervent for Findings of Fact and Conculsions of Law. Yot ire making a change in ie ordinances." Brewer: "I feel comfortable witl the Motion and the sect Mayor Glaisyer: "The Motion has -er. madE, and seconded t rant a variance to have each house located in Meadow Viev ;i2 reduced by 100 squal Motion Carried: Tolsma, yeE Orton, yea; Brewer, y( i�ingsford, Nay Brewer questioned Cada on if he c ild build the 9 propose mes without having to elude to the other two variances _,quested at this time. iiat we would like to see you do is get out there and build the tine homes and prove yc elf, and then come back for the other two variances if tY i --'s possible." Cada explained that out of the ni homes, only one has L car garage. "As far as the mix, using the same percentac but being able to de: Ite both the consumer and we feel fits best, we need this." "About half of these on properly designated lots." Orton: "How many homes do you it 2nd to build one car g, s on?" Cada: "We are asking for not to :ceed 306 one car gara( "So far that number is high. Out of nine sales, we have )tie one car garage." The Motion was made by Orton and conded by Brewer to gi a variance from the two car garage ordinance in Meadow VJ 1 #2 Subdivision, and 1_ no more than 300 of the homes will have a one car garage. Motion Carried: Tolsma, yez Orton, yea; Brewer, yE ingsford, Nay The Motion was made by Orton and conded by Brewer to al a variance to the geographical designation of the houses in Meac i View #2 Subdivision. Notion Carried: Kingsford, _�a; Tolsma, yea; Orton,11ek; Brewer, yea Iter. 6 Albert Blaser - Input Regarding V :->t Pine Property Mr. Albert Blaser was present rec esting the Council's cc tits on his property located at West Pine along the RXR Track: N.r. Blaser is asking County for Industrial Zoning on his 47+ acres. He stat J that he has a buyer i this property that wishes to bring some new industry into t valley. Mr. Blaser ; _:d that he was not at liberty at this time to divulge u. the buyers were. "I at liberty to tell you that they will have in the neighborhoc of 100 to 120 employe( "This will create some jobs." Meridian City Hall 3. Item #2 Cont'd, Conditional Use Permit, Public Hearing . Julv 6, 1982 Mr. Kennedy questioned if the new procedure requiring Fi gigs of Facts and Conclusions of Law had to be followed, since they had applied for th unditional Use Permit before the statute in the law went into effect. Wayne Crookston explained that this is a procedural chan in the law and would become effective to all things pending. Item 3 Public Hearing.- First Church of Christ; Locust Grove, E. Pine Annexation Mike Anderson was present representing the request by the irst Church of Christ for annexation of their property located at Locust Grove and t Pine into the City of Meridian, to be zoned "D" Industrial. Anderson: "We purchased this property in 1977, prior to which we found it was probably not the best place to bui by the Planning and Zoning that ves,, we could build a ChL be in an industrial area. We th,�n proceeded to find ano7 out on Cherry Lane. Now we end ip property rich and cast Church building until we sell the property. To sell the to -the City, immediately the fir t question that comes u[ in the City?, and we have had to say no. It is in agrees "We would ask that the property ,,e annexed into the City Comprehensive Plan, after Church." "We were advi.sed ;l there, but it would probably piece, which we did buy nor." "We can't build a operty, which is contiguous a purchaser is, is it with the Comprehensive Plan." the purpose of selling it." Mayor Glaisyer: "This is a Public Hearing for the annexa .n of the First Church of Christ property located at Locust Grove and East Pine. I ill now open the Public Hearing for comment either pro or con from the public con cning this annexation." There was no public response. Mayor Glaisyer: "There being no Public response, I will J close the Public Hearing." Mayor Glaisyer: "Are there any questions or comments fro he Council?" There were none. The Motion was made by Brewer to approve the First Church Christ Annexation with "D" Industrial Zoning. Kingsford: "Bill, we have the same thing, Findings of Fa, and Conculsions of Law here." " Brewer: "That's right." "We. have to back clear up again "Ok, back up then." The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Orton to di the City Attorney to prepare the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in reference i.he Annexation of the First Church of Christ property, and direct the Ordinance to be .pared. Motion Carried: Brewer, yea; Orton, yea; Tolsma, ye, ingsford, yea Item 4 Meadow View #2 - Square Footage Requirement Variance Tom Birch was present representing Sherwood and Roberts t1 Owners of Meadow View #2. Birch: "We would like to propose to the City Council that change of square footage size be allowed on the unit dwelling size." "We would li this so we can afford to build some house that people can get into." "In doing so, .., would also require some stricter energy guidelines." "What we would propose to do is reduce the minimum square footage of the homes by 100 square feet." "900 Fee jould be the minimum size." "We would also propose that the architectural control comp be allowed to assign the lets. As it stands now, the lots are assigned and it set to which lot has 1,000 square feet, and which has 1,300 square feet.** **Peo I. that have tried to build houses or design houses have found some specific examples �re that does not work, or makes it very difficult to comply with that and build on t lot, making it somewhat unbuildable." i i U. F W E Meridian City Hall 4. July 6, 1982 TMg Item #4 Cont'd, Meadow View #2 - Square f Mage Requirement Varian . . , , , , , f, Birch: "Also, it is our underst ndi ng that as it stands, ,1,2ry lot has to have a two car garage." "What we would ike to propose, is that iiave a minimun of 70% with a two car garage." "It would be th duty of the Architecutu I Control Committee to ' assign that 70% two car garage, 3 / on odd lots and differ „i lots to have single cars." Mayor Glaisyer: "Have you discus ad anything with the nei,,fuors out there?" Birch: "We sent out the required otices." � Dan Cada, President of Energy.,Sa� ng Homes, Inc. addressed ho cost of the homes. Cada stated that the average cost of the homes was $55,000 d that they (Energy Saving,� Homes) has 9 homes in the l+•leadow i ew #2 Subdi vi son pre-sc Cada stated that they expected to build between 20 and 0 homes within the next Jays. Kingsford: "Ordinance Number 38.: we have a City Ordinanc mat paragraph 7 says If an owner or owners of a subdi ison desire to have this -,tion apply to their fN subdivison, they shall come befog the City Council with a ,,ended plat showing each lot and the minimum size house th t can be built thereon c wly shown" so they would � i . 4 have to come before the Council v, th an amended plat, or N. ,;Juld have to grant a " vaiance to .this Ordinance." Birch: "I think that is what we v re asking. That is why were asking for a variance, so that we could sign that mix. " Mayor Glaisyer: "Vern, (Vern Sci gin; Building Inspector) you have any comments at this time?" a 3 Schoen: "No comments." Orton: "Then you would be askinc for three variances? F( cihe reduction on the mimimun 4:h square footage, a variance on t two car garage requirf it, and you would be asking for a variance on the geoc iphical designation." Birch: "That is correct."A. Mayor Glaisyer: "Gary, (Gary Smi n; City Engineer) do yot ve any comments to make at this time?" Smith: "No Mr. Mayor, I don't.". Mayor called for any other commer 3 from the City Departmi Heads. There were non.', fi Mayor Glaisyer: "Wayne, (Wayne C ookston; City Attorney) you have any comments to�y�.` make at this time?"� Crookston: "I'm not quite sure c this procedure they have gone through. You require them to send out notices within 0 feet?" City Clerk Niemann: "Certified r iling and public notices." , Crookston: "Again, I think it's ne of those deals that has to have Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, but's thu is up to the Council." ,. Mayor Glaisyer: "Is there anyone in the audience that wishes. to make comment as to this v variance request?"�` n T s AVi "+ U } . a "Y' r ay t . �•': i n "fry Ix s a ,+�' kyy E ridian City Hall 5. Item #4 Cont'd, Meadow View #2 - Square Footage Requi ,Tient Varian Dale Babcock: "The registered letter that we _lot address( I guess that is one of my concerns. It does r,)t talk abot This particular subdivision has all ready been decreased ) about my property value being that I adjoin them." "My rc to do that." Joe. Simmnich: "I own property North of this subdivision, or not that these houses will be grouped, small houses in in.another since there will be no designation." July 6, 1982 he change of lot size. hange of house size. J ze once." "I'm concerned miendation would be not 1 I am concerned whether area, and larger ones i Kingsford: "I think that is something that I would like ee before it be adopted too."' Gene Kindred: "I am in the area of this also, and I thin[ iat there is an Ordinance to.go. by, and it's been plated, and surely all those lots Il take the size house that is was intended to be built on them. I am very opposed t(, -creasing the sizes of the houses in the City of Meridian. I don't think those smalle ouses will be to desirable i especially in our neighborhood. I think we should go by i Ordinance and not a variance." Schoen: "It runs about 17 inches." Councilman Orton: "I would like to find a way to suppor ;. Gordon Leishmann: "I have the Cherry Lynn Subdivision an( same,problem as Mr. Cada. I have built eight houses in tl. I have seven of them sold, but I can not build and sell a I can't find any buyers for it." "I have lost sells where and a lot together." "I am just basically here tonight tc plan to come in and ask for a variance to house size also. am faced with somewhat the in the last three months, :..e over 1,200 square feet, ,ople want to pick a house ,e how they do, because I Dave Healy: "We are buying one of the lots out in Meadow w." "The way the house sizes are now it makes it affordable for us." "In this di :nd age, anything higher in square footage than that puts it out of range for the a Ile income individual." "The reduced house size provides people an opportunity." le Steve Michales: "I am from Capital Plumbing. I do some c he plumbing in the area here.' I think that we should give Dan (Cada) every consir tion that we can. He is (. trying to put together a product that the public can use, o jobs for the local ecomony." Mayor.Glaisyer: "Are there any more comments or question, om the Public?" There was no response. "Dan (Cada) would you like to stet/ rward and address some of the questions that were raised?" Cada.:explained that the reason that they are asking for a lance to lot designation is so that they can get a good mix throughout the neighbor d. "Our only chance to build a quality home, to build an energy efficient hone, i lower that square footage." "We want to build something that people can be proud of." Councilman Kingsford questioned Vern Schoen, City Buildinc :pector, on what the water table at.Meadav View #2 was. Schoen: "It runs about 17 inches." Councilman Orton: "I would like to find a way to suppor liese requests to get the housing market moving again in Meridian, it is a big part Our economy." Councilman Kingsford: "We have two or three subdivisions i I can think of, that were approved prior to our having any minimun square foot -,s. Those builders could build anything in there that they would want. No building taking place there either." "It bothers me to throw it open entirely to a smaller hour A-ien in fact there are areas in Meridian where they can build that don't have tho .quare foot requirements." !'There are places in MMeriaian where taey.can build 900 fee less, and they are not building - if • j. City Ball 6. #4 Cont'd, Meadow View #2 - Square Footage Requir, lent variarn Councilman Brewer: "I don't feel that just be, --use they a.: really has anything to do with it." "These ho, -,s certainl• "I think that the name of the Company - Energy raving Lome: Megan Morgan: "I am representing Energy Savin, Ilomes." " have 9 signed ernest monies tonight and severa more on th, There is finally a quality product, one that a savers the e, entire nation is faced with. That product was )nly releas, month ago." "The product speaks for itself." "The people have 700 vacant and sitting lots in Meridian, of being us ,one is not there, and number two, your size li itations. for the reduction of size." "Until now, the I oduct has r; the markets' needs." Kingsford: ,But then., how do you guarantee q, _iity?" miorgan: The closest thing short of a law, ordinance, look through the amended covenance that we r:. -i drawn up, requirements are stricter than any that I am care of on July 6, 1982 doing it one place n't low income homes." s a good description." ink the fact that we Mrd speaks for itself. 1 problem that the ,o the public less than a willing to buy. You -cause the product, number ity must be the trade-off ,en available that answers covenance. If you will ,Till see that the energy j. 11 Brewer: "If I reernember right, that's the vez- thing we Wert Tying to do; a trade-off of reduced square footage for quality." Councilman Tolsma questioned the Consumer Pro action clau: covered by a 10 year homeowner warranty. Cada explained the homeowner warranty program in detail. Batch: "I don't want to mislead the Council .1 this. Th, Efficient Hic:nes. They are the member of the 1i i tse Council he said it is, there is the possiblity that :. ae of the 1 that are not under that. 6Ve are prepared to ,,_quire a wa program, on those properties too." "The way iiings are g to try to have Dan (Cada) build out the subd ision." The Motion was made by Orton to grant a vari, ce to 14eadc ® mi n mut. square footage on each unit to be dr( .ped 100 sqt Crookston: "I think that we are in the area )f Findings on this." "The other proble-n that I have i�, he notice i LaWana Niemann, City Clerk: "The notice spe -s of the s, ordinance that speaks of the homes alone." There was discussion concerning the wording .- the notict Crookston: "I think that the notice is prole my defecti Orton: '"What is the solution to that probls F Crookston: °,Go back and re -notice it." Brewer: "Why was this form used begin with atWana?" at states the homes are e on File) re Dan's (Cada) Energy ch is every bit of what gay be sold to some people y, a written warranty now, our intention is 'w #2, allowing the i-eet. ict and Conclusions of Law Says "lot sizes"." footage requirements Pape on File) Niemann: "I just used Wayne's (Crookston) i ,rm. It is ie same subdivision. 14hen they (Meadow View #2) came in in Feb. of 19s , Tfiayne dic, ablic Notice for the .square footage requirements on each lot. I. wasn't char. the lot sizes, it was . - M Meridian City Hall 7. Item #4 Cont'd, Meadow View #2 - Square F1 tage Requirement Bariarn Item 5 Niemann, Cont'd: " . . changing , e square footage requir, as being that Ordinance that stat so many will be so man not the lots. This is the one we id, and I just worded i Orton: "I still can't believe th; in readvertising the subdivision. if I can get a second." The Motion was seconded by Brewer Crookston: "We still have the pri Law. Unless you want to hold a s; next meeting until you can act." there is anything prod 'Therefore I would like tem witti the Findings c cial meeting, it is goi Kingsford: "We are not talking a ut a zoning or a condit� that law, it only applied to a ch, ging of the zone of the Crookston: "It's under the Local se Planning Act which rc Mayor Glaisyer: "Variances in zo ng, or,-)uilding?" Crookston: "I think that you wou proba Ay have the same zoning or anything. You are acti in a .j�iasi-judicial fa: question, or whether it's somebod coming in to put in July 6, 1982 :s we always speak of tare feet - the harm -s very same way." ie or useful to be done )tion to stand, and see :t and Conclusions of be at least until your L use. As I understand 1.11 to variances . " )lem whether it is 1, whether it's a zoning -uit stand." Al Tikker: "You are still going get th,, same people frc te subdivision that are here tonight that are going to cc back :,Cain. The other: they cared would be here tonight." Brewer: "We definitely want to h things. These people want to bui waiting for the snow to fly." "I uneeded routines." "Is there any make reference to, to know for su to the variance itself?" Crookston: "Yes." e thing3 right." "There nine homes. They shout ate to :;ee us spoil the ay Wayrn�, do you have m, one wa,l or the other a: Brewer: "I would like to ask for im (Crookston) to have i Crookston was excased from the Cr: ber f_cr research purpos( Mayor Glaisyer: "Let's go on to Mme otrec things while Wz Bills Statement No. 6, from J -U -B Engir of $556.04. This was an Interim services, and inspection service; Catm-mity Development Block Grant No. B -81 -DN -16-0001. The Motion was made by Kingsford billing, Statement No. 6, in the B-81-MDN-16-001, Sewer Rehabilitat ,rs, Inc. for Nud Project lling for admi.nistrativc >rovided in connection w:. ewer Services Line Reha} id seconded by Tolsma to count of $556.04, payable )n Func1. Motion Carried: Kingsford, !a; Tolana, yea; Brewer, ;t be a way to expedite building, and not �ier going through possibly i.al here that you could this having reprieve privilege. " is researching this." s presented in the amount rvices, engineering Phe City of Meridian Cation Project, Grant cove the J -U -B Engineers �)m the ITLD Grant Orton, yea 0 D Meridian City Hall 8. Item #5 Cont' d - Bills . . . . . . . . . . The bills were read. 6, The Motion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Brewer that the bills be paid. Motion Carried: Kingsford, yea; Tolsma, yea; Orton, yea; Brewer, yea The Mayor called a recess at 8:40 P.M. The Meeting was called back to order by Ivlayor Glaisyer at 8:52 P.M. Item #4 Cont'd - Meadow View #2, Square Footage Variance . . . . . . . . . . _5��7Mayor Glaisyer asked Attorney Crookston to report on his findings. Crookston: "Since we do not have a zoning ordinance, the ordinances that we do have that pertain to this, have to be the ordinances that govern zoning and lot sizes, the coverage on those lots. I think what you are doing is granting a variance from those ordinances, so I think that you would have to have the new requirement for Findings of Fact and Conculsions of Law. You are making a change in those ordinances. Brewer: "I feel comfortable with the Motion and the second." Mayor Glaisyer: "The Motion has been made and seconded to grant a variance to have each house located in Meadow View #2 reduced by 100 square feet." Motion Carried: Tolsma, yea; Orton, yea; Brewer, yea; Kingsford, Nay Brewer questioned Cada on if he could build the 9 proposed homes without having to elude to the other two variances requested at this time. "What we would like to see you do is get out there and build the nine homes and prove yourself, and then come back for the other two variances if that's possible." Cada explained that out of the nine homes, only one has a one car garage. "As far as the mix, using the same percentages but being able to designate both the consumer and we feel fits best, we need this." "About half of these are on properly designated lots." Orton: "How many homes do you intend to build one car garages on?" Cada: "We are asking for not to exceed 300 one car garage." "So far that number is m high. Out of nine sales, we have one one car garage." The Motion was made by Orton and seconded by Brewer to grant ,_i variance from the two car garage ordinance in meadow View #2 Subdivision, and that no more than 30% of the homes will have a one car garage. Motion Carried: Tolsma, yea; Orton, yea; Brewer, yea; Kingsford, Nay The Motion was made by Orton and seconded by Brewer to allow a variance to the geographical designation of the houses in Meadow View #2 Subdivision. Motion Carried: Kingsford, yea; Tolsma, yea; Orton, yea; Brewer, yea Item 6 Albert Blaser - Input Regarding west Pine Property Mr. Albert Blaser was present requesting the Council's comments on his property located at West Pine along the RXR Tracks. Mr. Blaser is asking Ada county for Industrial Zoning on his 47+ acres. Iie stated that he has a buyer for this property that wishes to bring some new industry into the valley. Mr. Blaser stated that he was not at liberty at this time to divulge who the buyers were. "I am at liberty to tell you that they will have in the neighborhood of 100 to 120 employees." "This will create some jobs." a ti SECOND AMENDMENT OF DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR MEADOW VIEW NO. 2 SUBDIVISION July 1, 1982 WHEREAS, SHERWOOD & ROBERTS, INC., A Washington Corporation has acquired MEADOW VIEW NO. 2 SUBDIVISION from ALLEN-MONTEE, an Idaho General Partnership comprised of Roger H. Allen and Kenneth D. Montee and shall hereinafter be referred to as the new "Declarant". WHEREAS, the new Declarant desires to amend said Declaration in the following particulars: 1) ARTICLE I, Section 4 shall be deleted and in its place the following ARTICLE I, Section 4 shall be substituted in lieu thereof: ARTICLE I, Section 4.: "Declarant" shall mean and refer to SHERWOOD & ROBERTS, INC., A Was ington Corporation, its successors and assigns. 2) Delete ARTICLE II, Section 1(b) and in its place the following ARTICLE II, Section 1(b) shall be substituted in lieu thereof: r p ARTICLE II, Section 1(b): No Dwelling shall be erected, placed or permitted to remain on any Lot other than a single-family dwellina not to exceed two stories in height and a private garage for not less than two (2) cars in a minimum of 70% of the homes and not less than one (1) car in a maximum of 30% of the homes. The use of any Lot for multi -family Dwelling Units is prohibited. The minimum square footage of a Dwelling Unit construction on a Lot within the subdivision, exclusive of open porches and patios and the garage area, shall be as follows: A. No Houses may be construction under 900 square feet. B. Ten Percent (10%) of the Dwelling constructed within the development may have a square footage under 1000 square'feet. C. Twenty Percent (20%) of the Dwellings constructed within the development may have a square footage between 1000 and 1100 sq, ft. D. Forty Percent (40%) of the Dwellings constructed within the development may have a square footage between 1100 and 1200 sq. ft. E. Thirty Percent (30%) of the Dwellings construction withintthe development may have a square footage between 1200 and 1300_sq. ft. The ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE as designated below in ARTICLE IV shall have the authority to designate and intersperse the Dwellings and Lots accordingly for the purpose of harmony of design with existing or previously approved structures. 3) ARTICLE III, Paragraph (b) shall be amended to read as follows: (b) For the use and benefit of each Lot (hereafter called "dominant Lot") on which the Architectural Control Committee has approved a zero lot -line dwelling not abutting or attached to the dwelling on the adjacent Lot, and the Owner thereof, an express and exclusive easement(s) on, over and across the Lot(s) (hereafter called It lot") contiguous to and abutting the dominant lot as follows: (i) An easement for ingress and egress to repair or maintain any portion of the installed or constructed improvements on the dominant lot when reasonable access thereto is not available from the dominant lot itself; A a (ii) An easement not to exceed five (5) feet for eaves and T,;Y other portions of the building integral to the improvements` located on the dominant lot projecting beyond the lot line r" dividing the dominant lot and the servient lot, provided that such eaves and other projections shall be at a height that shall not unreasonably interfere with the use of the servient lot by the '' Owner thereof and, provided further that the eaves and other g - projections shall have been approved by the Architectural Control`}� Committee. 7� No building or structure shall be placed or permitted to remain on any easement area within any Lot, and no other activities shall be undertaken on " any Lot which will interfere with the access and use intended to be provided by said easement or the installation or maintenance of the facilities locatedRt therein.�� F i The areas within each easement on a Lot shall be maintained by the Owner �h4 thereof, except for any portion thereof which is the responsibility of the user of the easement. 4) ARTICLE IV, Paragraphs (a) and (b) are hereby amended and shall hereaftery read as follows: ARTICLE IV: ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE *Mx (a) The Architectural Control Committee shall be composed of the s following persons:Y k W. Tom Birch Kathy Tealey 1755 Westgate Drive 1755 Westgate Drive k. Boise, ID. 83704 Boise, ID. 83704` Timothy J. Sullivan, Jr. Dan Cada P �° 1755 Westgate Drive 7705 Iron Court' Boise, ID. 83704 Boise, ID. 83704 }` Until changed by majority of the Committee, W. Tom Birch is designated as its representative to act for it. In the event of death or resignation ofIt any member Df the Committee, the remaining members hsall have the full authority�'Y to designate a successor. The members of the Committee shall not be entitled to any compensation for services performed in connection with their responsibilities 4$ At any time, the then record Owners of a majority of the Lots shall have the power through a duly recorded written instrument to change the membership of the Committee or to withdraw from the Committee or to restore to it any of its powers and duties, (b) Prior to commencing any work or building requiring the approval, of said committee, there shall be submitted to the Committee one complete« set of plans and specifications for any and all proposed improvements and no work or construction shall commence until the final plans, elevations and specifications therefor have received written approval by the Committee._" Such plans shall also include plot plans showing the location on the Lot of the building, fence, wall or other structure proposed to be constructed, altered, placed, or maintained, together with the proposed construction material, color schemes or roofs and exteriors thereof and proposed landscape � planning. s Energy performance calculations will be required by the Committee. Other energy conservation items to be considered by the Committee in determining x whether to approve the plans and specifications are air infiltration m such as caulking exterior sill plates to concrete slabs or foundation walls, easures �a 4 insulating ductwork, water heaters, and installing insulating gaskets behind all switch and outlet covers, caulking electrical and plumbing holes through exterior walls, insulated closeable foundation vents, exterior framingfor maximum insulation values and overall insulation standards. The commttee � will require minimum R -Values of 18 - walls, 38 - ceiling, and 11- crawlspace. The Committee also will require a written warranty from the builder on the k .3 protection of their home. 5 P�� ' r. 'nxm: " RA -2-�. SEI � }y^ Y 3 I '1 v t j b 333Sia B The Committee shall approve or disapprove plans and specifications within thirty (30) days from the receipt thereof, or shall notify the person submitting them that an additional period of time, not to exceed thirty (30) days is required for such approval or disapproval. Pians and specifications not approved or disapproved within the time limits provided herein, shall be approved as submitted. The approval of plans and specifications by the Committee does not relieve the Owner of the"necessity of obtaining a building permit(s) from those government entities having jurisdiction and control over the properties. Notwithstanding the approval by the Committee, each Owner submitting such plans or specifications shall be solely responsible for the sufficiency thereof. Further, neither the Declarant nor the members of the Committee shall be liable for any loss or damage or claim thereof arising from any defect or alleged defect in such plans and specifications or the construction or use thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has caused this Second Amendment to be executed the day and year first above written. SHERWOOD & ROBERTS, INC. W. Tom Birch, Asst. Vide President State of Idaho) ss. County of Ada ) On this day of JULY, 1982, before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared W. Tom Birch, known to me to be the Assistant Vice President of Sherwood & Roberts, Inc., A Washington Corporation, that executed the instrument and the person who executed said instrument on behalf of said Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my'official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for Idaho Residing at Boise, Idaho Meridian Citv Council 2. Item 3 Meiners Tract - Request for Council Endorsement on County Rezone Bill Meiners was present representing his request of the Council for a letter of endorsement concerning a County rezone to residential. He stated that he would like the Council to endorse this concept. All members of the Council agreed that this would be an ideal solution. The Motion was made by Orton and seconded by Kingsford to authorize Mayor Glaisyer to write.a letter to Ada County Zoning endorsing the rezone on the Meiner's property. Motion Carried: Kingsford, yea; Tolsma, yea; Orton, yea; Brewer, yea; Item 4 Discussion: Model Ordinance Establishing and Fixing Rules of Procedure for Public Hearings Before the Meridian City Council Mayor Glaisyer presented his request that the Council adopt an Model Ordinance Establishing and fixing rules of procedure for public hearings that come before the City Council. There was discussion concerning this Ordiance. (Tape on File) Attorney Crookston explained that he felt this Ordinance would be very helpful in hearing procedures and could be modified or enlarged to fit the procedure that the Council would like to follow. (Tape on File) Crookston: "I would like to have you adopt this as a procedural policy." "We follow the procedure sometimes, but sometimes we don't." "This is mandated. We have to adopt some type of procedure." The Motion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Tolsma to authorize the City Attorney to draft a Procedural Ordinance for the Council's review. Motion Carried: Kingsford, yea; Tolsma, yea; Orton, yea; Brewer, yea; Item 5 Department Reports �. Vern Schoen questioned the Council on if they had a chance to inspect the wood foundations going in at Meadow View #2. Kingsford stated that he felt the Soil Conservation did not think the wood foundations were a good idea. Schoen agreed with Kingsfords opservation. There was discussion on the high ground water level. (Tape on File) Orton stated that he did not see anything in the Uniform Building Code concerning ground water. "They do not preclude building wood foundations on high ground water." "So, if the soil is ok then it (wood foundations) would probably be under the code right now." Kingsford questioned where the approval to put the wood foundations in at Meadow View #2 had come from. Brewer explained that Mayor Glaisyer got ahold of the majority of the Council to see if they would go along with the idea to put a couple of the wood foundations in and :Hake inspections on these two foundations. This was approved by a majority of the Council. (Tape on File) There was more discussion. (Tape on File) Schoen stated that he felt that use of the wood foundations should be a Council decision. Schoen explained that the inspections are done per the 1979 Book of Standards. (Tape on File) e a UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ,IGRII CULTURE f SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE P.O. Box 421, Meridian, Idaho 83642 July 14, 1982 Mr. Vern Schoen Building Inspector City of Meridian 728 Meridian Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Mr. Schoen: The following information is being provided concerning the characteristics of the Soil Series ABO Silt Loam that occurs in the Subdivision Meadow View No. 2, in the vicinity of NESE, Sec. 1, T. 1 S., R. 1 W. 1. Inventory and Evaluation of Land, Water, and Related Resources, SCS - CONSER - 5A concerning ABO Silt Loam Soil Series, Meridian SCS Fuld Office. 2. Letter from Harley Noe, Area Soil Scientist to Leland Holstine, District Conservationist, Meridian SCS Field Office, concerning ABO Silt Loam Soil Series. 3. Soil Series and Morphology of ABO Silt Loam. 4. Sec. 403.2(b) of SCS National Soil Survey Handbook, Part II, NSH Notice No. 24, of 3-31-1978. 5.` Table 7. - Building Site Development, Table 8. - Sanitary Facilities, Table 13. - Engineering Pro- perties and Classifications, Table 14. - Physical and Chemical Properties of Soils, Table 15. - Soil and Water Features, Ada County Area Soil Survey Manual, U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation Service, May 1980. We are hopeful that this data will provide you with the in- formation you requested. 01n;_21�' Ron Perrin Acting District Conservationist Meridian SCS Field Office 0 R . t a ' ' e i s 4i4 y55 4 hv3: i3`< i ;ice sy* iw.r i a, v+� F Page 2 Inventory and Evaluation - City of Meridian, Idaho, Vern Schoen, Building Inspector. Request of Information 06 JULY 1982 6. Plasticity Index - 5 to 15. 7. Support load for single family dwellings less than 3 stories with a concrete foundation 2 feet in depth or below frost line. Subsurface draingage may be required. 8. Corrosion of Uncoated Steel is high. 9. Coitasion`_of"Concrete is Low. 10. Suitability for Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Severe. Supporting Data Provided: 1. Letter from Harley Noe, Arca Soil Scientist to Leland Holstine, District Conservationist, Meridian SCS Field Office, concerning ABO Silt Loam Soil Series Characteristics. 2. Soil Series and Morphology of ABO Silt Loam Pages 136 and 137 Ada County Area Soil Survey Manual. 3. Sec. 403.2(b), Soil Conservation Service National Soil Survey Handbook Part II, NSH Notice 24 of 3 - 31 - 1978. 4. Table 7. - Building Site Development, Table 8. - Sanitary Facilities, Table 13. - Engineering Properties and Classifications, Table 14. - Physical and Chemical Properties of Soils, Table 15.- Soil and Water Features. Ada County Area Soil Survey Manual, U.S.D.A.,Soil Conservation Service, May 1980 Iv5' zy g4 k i. yy 4 yy 4 v r vk< kMa+n 3 4 < 6, 1^ i SOIL SURVEY ADA COUNTY AREA, IDAHO Soil series and morphology friable, sticky and plastic; many very fine and few In this section, each soil series recognized in the fine roots; common very fine and fine and few medium and coarse tubular pores; many thick clay survey area is described in detail. The descriptions are films on peds and common thick clay films in pores; arranged in alphabetic order by series name. Characteristics of the soil and the material in which it few fine limp filaments; moderately alkaline; clear formed are discussed for each series. The soil is then wavy boundary. C1 ca -23 to 29 inches; pale brown (10YR 6/31 silt loam compared to similar soils and to nearby soils of other series. Then a pedon, a small three-dimensional area of brown 10YR 513] moist f fine distinct dark red - soil that is typical of the soil series in the survey area, is dish brown 5YR 3/3 moist mottles- weak fine and medium subangular blocky structure; soft, very fri- described. The detailed descriptions of each soil horizon follow standards in the Soil Survey Manual (4). Unless able, sticky and plastic; common fine roots; common otherwise noted, colors described are for dry soil. very fine and fine and few medium and coarse tubu- Following the pedon description is the range of impor- lar pores; few fine lime veins; strongly effervescent; tant characteristics of the soil series in this survey area. strongly alkaline; clear wavy boundary. C2ca-29 to 38 inches; pale brown (10YR 6/3) loam, Phases, or map units, of each soil series are described in the section Soil maps for detailed planning. dark brown (10YR 4/3) moist; common, medium, distinct dark reddish brown (5YR 3/3) moist mottles; Abo series massive; soft, very friable, slightly sticky and slightly plastic; few very fine roots; common very fine and The Abo series consists of very deep, some ha fine tubular pores; slightly calcareous; mildly alka- poorly drained soils. These soils formed in mixed allu- line; clear wavy boundary. vium. They are in broad drainageways and on low alluvial C3-38 to 58 inches; light yellowish brown (10YR 6/4) terraces and have slopes of 0 to 3 percent. The average loam, dark brown (10YR 3/3) moist; few medium annual precipitation is 11 inches, and the average annual and large distinct very dark gray (2.5YR 3/0) moist temperature is 51 degrees F. mottles; massive; hard, firm, slightly sticky and Abo soils are similar to Oliaga Variant soils. They are slightly plastic; common very fine and fine tubular near Elijah, McCain, Oliaga Variant, Pipeline, Power, pores; mildly alkaline; abrupt wavy boundary. Purdam and Sebree soils. Unlike Abo soils, Oliaga Vari- ant soils do not haves -in argillic horizon. Elijah, Purdam, elly coarse sandy loam, dark brown (10YR 4/3) and Sebree soils have a hardpan between depths of 20 moist; massive; slightly hard, friable, slightly sticky and 40 inches. McCain soils are 20 to 40 inches deep to and nonplastic; 20 percent fine pebbles; mildly alka- basalt. Pipeline soils are less than 20 inches deep to a line. hardpan. Power soils are well drained. Typical pedon of Abo silt loam about 2 1/2 miles The A horizon is light brownish gray or brown. It does g g y northwest of Meridian, approximately 780 feet north and not contain the organic carbon required to qualify it as a 390 feet west of the SE cor. of sec. 34, T. 4 N., R. 1 W. mollic epipedon. The B horizon is pale brown, grayish brown, light Ap-0 to 10 inches; light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) silt brownish gray, or brown. loam, very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) moist; The C horizon is pale brown, light yellowish brown, or weak thick platy structure; hard, friable, slightly very pale brown silt loam to gravelly coarse sandy loam. sticky and slightly plastic; many very fine, common Mottling occurs at a depth of 15 to 30 inches. The fine, and few coarse roots; few coarse tubular pores; water table is at a depth of 3 to 5 feet at the peak of the moderately alkaline; gradual smooth boundary. irrigation season unless the soil is artificially drained. B21tca-10 to 17 inches; pale brown (10YR 6/3) silty clay loam, dark brown (10YR 3/3) moist; moderate A a series medium subangular blocky structure; slightly hard, friable, sticky and plastic; many very fine 2��d few The Ada series consists of very ep, well drained fine roots; many very fine and few medium and soils. ase soils formed in c se, granitic alluvium. They are n alluvial terraces nd have slopes of 4 to 60 coarse tubular pores; common thin clay films on pads and many thick clay films in pores; weak lime percent. T average an al precipitation is 14 inches, accumulation in pores; moderately alkaline; clear and the ave ge ann temperature is 50 degrees F. Ada soils are nea rent, Day, Ladd, Searles, Tenmile, smooth boundary. B22tca-17 to 23 inches; pale brown (10YR 6/3) silty and Van Dusen oils. Brent and Van Dusen soils are clay loam, dark brown (10YR 3/3) moist; rowri less than 35 p rc t rock fragments in the control sec - tion. Day so' are re than 60 percent clay, and they (10YR 4/3) moist crushed; few fine istinct dark e is rown (5Y 3/ i t ottles,, moderate m wm su angular blocky structure; slightly hard, do not co ain coarse agments in the profile. Ladd soils do not ontain coarse f ments in the argillic horizon, g and ey are less than 35 rcent clay. Searles soils are y �33>c x i< k, Y d aB y a µ tl, A , , NSH - PART II 403.2(b) (b) Dwellings without basements are single-family houses_ of three stories or less without basements. the foundation iR assume to be spread footings of reinforced concrete built oL_undisturbed soil at a depth of 2 feet or the depth of maximum frost penetration, whichever is deeper. o The ratings are based on properties affecting soil strength and settlement under a load, and those that affect excavation and construction costs. The properties affecting soil strength and settlement are presence of a high water table and flooding, and the shrink -swell behavior and compressibility of the soils. Compressibility is inferred from the Unified classification. Properties influencing the ease and amount of excavation are flooding, high water table, slope, depth to bedrock or cemented pan, and the amount of coarse fragments. If soil slippage is observed, the soil should be rated "severe -- slippage." m 0 NSH Notice 24 - 3/31/78 k zx d 1 i'r 3t4,� xq^ s— 4 A M A st t a� 4 Wu1 It i t i NSH - PART II 7xAp4 f x�. 77 0,11 'TP 403.2(b) DWELLINGS WITHOUT BASEMENTS t 1 i LIMITS 11RESTRICTIVE PROPERTY ; SLIGHT ! MODERATE ! SEVERE ! FEATURE Y 9-3 ! S ! 1. USDA TEXTURE ; --- ; --- ; ICE !PERMAFROST FLOODING JN i��--�;, --- y • ;RARE, ;FLOODS &" R PROTECTED ,, b COMMON ; ' ; ( 3. DEPTH TO HIGH WATER M F ..' Li .. .,. . TABLE (FT) ; --- ! --- ! + ;PONDING ! >2.5 ! 1.5-2.5 ! 0-1.5 !WETNESS 4. SHRINK -SWELL ! LOW ! MODERATE ! HIGH !SHRINK -SWELL 5. B/UNIFIED ! --- ! --- !OL, OH, PTILOW STRENGTH 6. SLOPE (PCT) ! 0-8 ! 8-15 ! >15 !SLOPE ! ! ! 7. DEPTH TO BEDROCK (IN): ! ! ! !DEPTH TO ROCK HARD ! >40 ! 20-40- ! <20 ! SOFT ! >20 ! <20 ! --- 8. DEPTH TO CEMENTED ! _ PAN (IN): ! ! ; !CEMENTED PAN THICK ! >40 ! 20-40 ! <20 ! THIN ! >20 ! <20 ! --- 9. FRACTION >3 IN ; <25 ! 25-50 ! >50 !LARGE STONES (WT PCT) ! I/Weighted average to 40 inches. B/Thickest layer between 10 and 40 inches. a NSH Notice 24 - 3/31/78 s 7xAp4 f x�. 77 0,11 'TP t 1 R Jw ,r � lln Y 9-3 S h k 6 &" R b M F ..' Li .. .,. . 206 SOIL TABLE 7. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT [Some terms that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions! "Slight," "moderate," and "severe." Absence of an entry indicates that the soil was not rated] Soil name and i Shallow map symbol i excavations Dwellings without basements I'1---- ---------- -IModerate: Abo I wetness. Severe: �1 I floods.) 2-----------------ISevere: ISevere: Ada i outbanks cave. I shrink -swell. I I 3, 4-------------- ISevere: I ISevere: Ada I eutbanks cave, I slope, I slope. I shrink -swell. 5*' 1 f Aeric Haplaqueptsl 1 6-----------------ISevere: ISevere: Baldock I wetness, I floods. eutbanks cave. I 7-----------------IModerate: 1 ISevere: Beetville i wetness. i floods. I 8, 9 -------------- ISlight----------- IModerate: Bissell ` i shrink -swell. I 10----------------ISevere: I ISevere: Bowns i depth to rock. I shrink -swell, I i low strength. I 11*: 1 I 1 Bowns------------ ISevere: ISevere: I depth to rock. I shrink -swell, I I i low strength. I Rock outcrop. I I I 1 12----------------IModerate: 1 ISevere: Bram I wetness. I floods. 1 13, 14, 15, 16----IModerate: 1 ISevere: Brent I too clayey. 1 low strength, I I I shrink -swell. 17----------------ISevere: 1 ISevere: Brent I slope. I slope I I lowstrength, I 1 i shrink -swell. 18*: 1 1 Brent------------ISevere: ISevere: Islope. I slope, ' 1 low strength, 1 I I shrink -swell. Haw--------------ISevere: ISevere: I slope. I I slope. 1 See footnote at end of table. Dwellings I Small with I commercial basements 1 buildinas I It ISevere: floods. ISevere: I shrink -swell. I ISevere: I slope, I shrink -swell. I I I I ISevere: I wetness, I floods. I ISevere: ` floods. I IModerate: shrink -swell. f ISevere: I depth to rock, I shrink -swell, low strength. I ISevere: 1 depth to rock, I shrink -swell, 1 low strength. I I ISevere: ` floods. I ISevere: I shrink -swell, I low strength. ISevere: I slope, I shrink -swell, 1 low strength. 1 ISevere: I slope, I shrink -swell, I low strength. ISevere: I slope. I ISevere: I floods. ISevere: I slope, 1 shrink -swell. ISevere: slope, { shrink -swell. ISevere: 1 floods. I I ISevere: 1 floods. IModerate: I shrink -swell. ! 1 !Severe: 1 shrink -swell, 1 low strength. ISevere: 1 shrink -swell, 1 low strength. I ISevere: floods. ! ! ISevere: I low strength, I shrink -swell. ! ISevere: I slope, 1 low strength, 1 shrink -swell. ! ISevere: I slope, I low strength, 1 shrink -swell. ISevere: I slope. I Local roads and streets ISevere: frost action. ! ISevere: shrink -swell. ! !Severe: 1 slope, ! shrink -swell. ISevere: I frost action. ! IModerate: I low strength, 1 frost action. q7 IModerate: 1 low strength, 1 frost action, 1 shrink -swell. ISevere: 1 low strength, ! shrink -swell. !Severe: 1 low strength, 1 shrink -swell. I !Moderate: 1 frost action, 1 low strength. ISevere: 1 low strength, shrink -swell. {Severe: 1 slope, 1 low strength, 1 shrink -swell. ISevere: I slope, low strength, { shrink -swell. !Severe: 1 slope. i A 4Stet u`x'K �; a mt t 8� M" �r 3 110 k§ i +'a4k V + Py � 2PUN, § d f � t k 220 SOIL V TABLE 8. --SANITARY FACILITIES [Some terms that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitiri "slight," "moderate," "good," "fair," and other terms. Absence of an entry indicates that the soil V; s not rated] W ` Soil name and { Septic tank { Sewage lagoon { Trench ; Area ; Daily carr map symbol { absorption { areas { sanitary { sanitary ; for landf... i fields I f landfill ! landfill ! 1=----- ------ —ISevere: (Severe: ISevere: (Severe: {Fair: _= Abo I wetness I seepage, I seepage, I wetness, ! wetness. IT I wetness. I wetness. ! seepage. S ' 1 S f ! 2-------------------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: {Severe: 'Poor: Ada I peres slowly. I seepage, I seepage, i seepage. ! too clayey, ` S S slope. i too clayey. ! { small stoney 5,I 3-------------------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ;Poor: Ada I slope, i seepage, I seepage, ! seepage, ! slope, I peres slowly. I slope. I too clayey. ! slope. 1 small stone:. too clayey. 4-------------------ISevere: ISevere: !Severe: ISevere: (Poor: Ada I slope, I seepage, I seepage, ! seepage, I slope, I peres slowly. I slope. I slope, ! slope. ! small store, too clayey. { ! too clayey. r, Aeric Haplaquepts I I f ! ! 6 -------------------{Severe: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: !Fair: ' Baldock I wetness. ! seepage, I wetness, ! seepage, ! wetness. i ! wetness. I seepage. I wetness. ! 7------- IModerate• ' ------ {Severe: ISevere: ISevere: ,Good. fie Beetville { wetness, { seepage. S seepage, I seepage. ! Y ! peres slowly. I I wetness. ! I 8 -------------------{Severe: {Moderate: ISevere: !Slight -----------!Fair: Bissell ! peres slowly. { seepage. ! seepage. ! ! too clayey. 9-------------------ISevere: IModerate: !Severe: !Slight -----------!Fair: Bissell ! peres slowly. I seepage, ! seepage. ! ! too clayey. I S slope. S ! ! .°f 10------------------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: !Slight ----------- !Poor: '+ Bowns I depth to rock, I depth to rock. I depth to rock, ! I thin layer, I peres slowl i clayey. ! ' � I y. , too cla , area reclele, ! I ! ! too clayey. Bowns--------------ISevere: !Severe: ISevere: !Slight -----------1 Poor: I depth to rock, I slope, S depth to rock, ! ! thin layer, `f I peres slowly.. I depth to rock. i too clayey. 3 ! area reclale, too clayey. Rock outcrop. { ! { I ! 12------------------ISevere: {Severe: !Severe: !Severe: ' Bram ,Fair: ! wetness, I wetness, i wetness, ! seepage, ! wetness. �. ! peres slowly. i seepage. ! seepage. I wetness. 13, 14, 15----------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere:' !Slight -----------!Poor: Brent { peres sjowly. ! seepage. i too clayey. ! ! too clayey. 16------------------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: !Moderate: !Poor: `"1,Brent ! peres slowly. { slope, ! too clayey. I slope. ! too clayey. 7:1! I seepage. S f ! See footnote at end of table. �. f� �% rc ff 1 w t d 4 k it # xz j r :tr �a„* 56 d r y r , a s�ro�i i �c�. ^�� � tIq " K°'f "1"14 �.��+ i " 001 'FY'J, 1 R3$ "'14Pf ' ry i^ 4 } 4, ' s v a A', �.`�9 k'4�,i"�t T,IN ;+ k�� :$ 'srh t^ ;,mom t y { l2 a, , di' F, <-; ' +�'f° k(s `•v * �a $: A a x a '? ""Y k ice„,. Or, r se r r -fes . "�3.# a,".. x ;'F• ks+F ' t z h'"� ,�n?x�,"" .'# .' °u. f ro-> h�'',a..e:�� , a . M 286 DGA TABLE 13. --ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS [The symbol > means more than. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated] r-----�---------- -r------------------r--- - r --------------e--------------- Classification ,Frag- , Percentage passing Soil name and !Depth! USDA texture ; - -; --- ;ments i____-___ sieve number_--_ ____Miquid;f map symbol ; ; 1 Unified 1 AASHTO 1 > 3 ; ;------;-"-- 1 - 1 limit ! ------------------r -In--r - -- - - - - - - - - - - -'- - i -----!inches! 4 i 10 ! 40 i 200 1 -- -- ! ---T ---- Pct r----- l------�--- -- -- - �--Pct 1--- --- ----------� 0-10:Silt loam -------IML, CL-ML:k-4 ! 0 ! 100 195-100;85-100!70-85 ; 20-30; Abo ,10-231C1ay loam, siltylSC, !A-4, 4-6! 0 1 100 195-100!75-100!40-85 1 25-35! ! ! Clay loam, I SM -SC, i ! sandy clay ! CL -ML, I 1 I 1 i ! loam. 1 CL :23-58:Loam, silt loam,1ML :A-4 ! 0 1 100 :95-100180-100!50-80 1 20-251 { very fine sandy! ! ! loam. ! 158-65:Stratified fine !SM 1A-2 1 0-5 185-100160-100!50-75,:20-30 1 20-25: ! ! gravelly coarse! ! ! sandy loam to I I ! ! coarse sand. 2, 3, 4------------1 0-101Gravelly sandy 1GM-GC, !A-1, A-21 0-5 :60-85 :55-75 :30-55 :20-30 : 20-301 Ada ! 1 loam. 1 GM ! : ! SM -SC, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! SM 110-37!Very gravelly !GC !A-2, A-71 5-10 140-60 130-50 125-50 115-50 1 45-551* ! ! sandy clay, : : ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! very gravelly 1 ! : clay. : I 137-47:Very gravelly :GP, GP-GMlA-1 110-30 :35-40 :20-30 :10-20 ! 0-10 i loamy coarse ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! : sand. 147-801Sand and gravel !GP 1A-1 110-30 130-35 :15-25 1 0-5 : I : : Aeric Haplaquepts 6--------i 0-8 !Loam ------------:ML, CL-MLIA-4 ! 0 190-100!90-100175-100!55-85 : 20-301 Baldoek : 8-451Loam, silt loam 1ML, CL-ML:A-4 ! 0 190-100:90-100:75-100155-85 ! 20-30;f :45-60!Stratified fine !SP -SM, SMIA-1 ! 0 155-70 l40-55 120-40 ! 5-20 ! 20-25;1 ! ! sandy loam to ! ! sand and ! ! gravel. I I 1 I I 1 1 i 1 1 I i 7------------------: 0-141Fine sandy loam !CL -ML, MLlA-4 : 0 :95-100195-100!85-95 160-75 ! 20-35! Beetville 114-471Stratified sandy!ML 1A-4 : 0 :95-100:95-100:70-85 150-70 1 20-351 ! 1 loam to loam. 1 ' 1 , , , 147-60!Loamy coarse 1SM 1A-2 1 0-5 190-100185-100150-75 115-30 1- ! ! 1 sand. : : : ! : ! ! ! ! ! ! ! : : : ! ! ! ! ! 8, 9---------------1 0-9 !Loam ------------ 1ML, CL-ML:A-4 : 0 1 100 1 100 185-95 :60-75 1 20-301 Bissell 1 9-171Clay loam, sandy!CL, SC :A-6 ! 0 1 100 195-100!80-100135-80 ! 30-35; ! 1 clay loam. ! ! ! : ! ! ! : 117-46:Loam------------ ;ML, CL-MLIA-4 : 0 1 100 :95-100:85-95 :60-75 1 20-30; 146-60:Sandy loam, !SM !A-2, A-4! 0 1 100 :95-100:50-75 115-40 1 20-25! I 1 loamy sand. ! ! 1 ' ' , 1 1 I , I I ; ! ! , 1 1 1 10-----------------1 0-7 !Stony loam------;CL-ML 1A-4 ! 5-15 :90-95 175-90 :65-85 :50-70 : 20-30 Bowns 1 7-28:Silty clay loam,1CL, CH !A-6, A-7: 0-10 185-100:85-100:80-100175-95 1 35-551 silty Clay, : clay. 128-35:Loam, silt loam !CL -ML 1A-4 1 0-10 :85-100!85-100:75-100160-90 1 25-301 35 :Unweathered bedrock. Gowns -------------1 0_7 !Extremely stony !CL -ML 1A-4 1.15-25 190-95 175-90 :65-85 :50-70 1 20-30; ! 1 loam. : 7-281Silty clay loam, :CL, CH !A-6, A-71 0-10 :85-100185-100:80-100:75-95 1 35-551 I 1 silty clay, : I clay. 128-35:Loam, silt loam !CL -ML 1A-4 1 0-10 185-100185-100!75-100!60-90 1 25-30: ! 35 !Unweathered ! ! bedrock. 1 1 Rock outcrop. See footnote at end of table. pM ,-y.41'1 i Jkf Yat4'1103�rz # 1 L 44,i w, 3 ¢ -14 d w 3� `R` w a.. r x "'? a q 1'vi. �' .� 3 i xd4 M,� d ��h'��� �>: Q k •�, a''a �` �-&n-e� `.t ,� , �li�b +2`� ' �" � � ;,� a� atP . a «z. OT YtN; d1j k :4 Y+ 5 M ' �'5 a 308 SOIL SUR:" TABLE 14. --PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS [The symbol < means less than; > means more than. Entries under "Erosion factors --T" apply to the entire profile. Entries under "Wind erodibilit group" n " " y only o Absence of an entry indicates that data were not available or wereenotaestimated]tthe surface layer. --------------- ----; ----- ------ ---------T ---------- i----------------� ----------r--------- Soil name and , Eroslo ,Depth,Clay , Moist , Permea- ,Available; Soil ;Salinity; Shrink- ; factors:eroderodi-,Orga•: map symbol , , !reaction, , swell -- : bulk : billty , water ' � , - i , densit r , , ,billty, meter : In '---' -F _,capacity, , _ _ ,potential ; K ; T ;group ; ' i Pct , G%emj , In/hr ; In%in eH �Mmhos/cmi ; Pct 1----- ----------! 0-10: 5-20:1.40-1.501 0.6-2.0 10.19-0.21' .4-d.4 ' 2-8 ' i i r Mow- ------10.43, 5 , 5 , 1-2 Abo :10-23122-3511.40-1.501 0.2-0.6 10.14-0.2117.4-8.4 2-8 ;Moderate 10-.371 i ' 123-581 5-15:1.50-1.601 0.6-2.0 10.15-0.2117.,4 0 , 2-8 ;Low -------;0,43; : l 8-651 3-8 :1.50-1.601 2.0-6.0 10.06-0.08 7.4-8.4 : 2_$ ' ! 1 ,Low ------_;0.17: : 1 2, 3, 4----------1 0-10112-1811.45-1.501 2.0-6.0 10.07-0.0916.6-7.3 1 <2 !Low ------- ;0.20: 3 1 3 ! --- Ada 110-37145-5511.20-1.50:0.06-0.2 10.09-0.1216.6-7.3 1 <2 :High ------10.28: ; 137-471 5-1011.60-1.701 >20 10.03-0.0616.6-7.3 1 <2 Mow ------- 10.10; 147-801 0-5 11.60-1.701 >20 10.03-0.0616.6-7.3 : <2 Mow ------- ;0.101 1 1 5*. Aeric Haplaquepts. 1 1 i 1 i i 6----------------! 0-8 112-2211.40-1.501 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.2117.9-8.4 1 2-4 Baldock 1 8-45124-2711.50-1.601 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.2117.4-9.0 ' 2-4 !Low -------;0.321 5: 4L 1 1-2 , !Low ------- 10.321 145-601 5-1511.55-1.65: 2.0-6.0 10.04-0.1517.4-8.4 1 <2 Mow ------- :0.101 ! 7----------------1 0-14;10-18:1.45-1.50: 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.1816.6-8.4 1 <2r Beetville 114-47:10-1811.50-1.601 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.20!7.4-8.4 ' <2 :Low '0.43' S : 6 , 2-4 , Mow ------- 10.431 ; ! 147-601 2-7 11.60-1.701 6.0-20 10.03-0.0816.6-8.4 1 <2 :Low ------- :0.55! ! ' 8, 9-------------1 0-9 :12-18:1.40-1.501 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.1816.1-7.3 1 <2 :Low ---- ---10.32; 5 1 5 1 2-4 Bissell 1 9-17:25-3511.40-1.50; 0.2-0.6 ;0.14-0.2116.6-8.4 1 <2 ;Moderate ;C�,+;; : 117-U6l12-18:1.50-1.60: 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.1816.6-7.3 : C, :f.0w------- :0,;;1 146-601 2-8 :1.60-1.701 >6.0 0.06-n, ' 1 i:�,.h-7. i : i.` :Lug -------:0. I'., : 10---------------1 0-7 118-2211.45-1.551 0.6-2.0 10.14-0.1616.6-7.8 ! <2 Bowns 1 7-28135-55:1.20-1.5010.06-0.2 '0.14-0.2116.6-9.0 1 <2 :High gh------10.37: 2 !' 6 ! 1-2 128-35122-2711.50-1.601 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.1818.5-9.0 1 <2 ------:0.281 1 ! 1 35 1 --- Low -w- - -----10.37: 1 1 Gowns-----------: 0-7 118-22'1.45-1.551 0.6-2.0 10.14-0.16:6.6-7.8 1 <2 'ow------- ;0.321 2 8 1-2 1 7=28:35-55!1.20-1.5010.06-0.2 10.14-0.2116.6-9.0 1 <2 !L 128-35!22-27:1.50-1.60: 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.18!8.5-9.0 1 <2 :High ------,0.28, ; , 1 35 1 --- :Low ------- ;0.37! ! ! Rock outcrop. 12---------------1 0-3 115-18!1.40-1.50: 0.2-0.6 :0.16-0.21:7.8+ 1 >4 ;Low ------- ;0.43: 5 1 4L 1 1-2 Bram ; 3-60115-18!1.50-1.601 0.2-0.6 10.15-0.1717.4-9.0 1 >4 :Low ------- 10.241 1 ; 13, 14, 15, 16, 17--------------1 0-5 :15-2011.35-1.451 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.18!6.6-7.3 : <2 ' 1 i ! Brent ,Low -------:0.491 5 ! 5 ! 1-2 : 5-18:15-20:1.40-1.50: 0.6-2.0 :0.16-0.21:7.4-7.8 : <2 :Low ------- ;0.49: : ; 118-4035-551.20-1.401 <0.06 :0.14-0.1717.4-8.4 1 <2 :High ------10.241 ! 140-46,25-4011.40-1.501 0.2-0.6 10.19-0.2117.9-8.4 1 <2 :Moderate 10.241 : 146-641 5-1011.60-1.70: 6.0-20 10.05-0.0817.9-8.4 1 <2 :Low---- --10.15: : ! r r , , Brent-----------' 0-5 ,15-20,1.35-1.45, 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.1816.6-7.3 ! <2 ;Low -----__10,49: 5 ! 5 ! - 1 5-18!15-2011.40-1.501 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.21:7.4-7.8 1 <2 Mow ------- ;0.491 1 ''-- 118-40135-5511.20-1.401 <0.06 10.14-0.17!7.4-8.4 ' <2 140-46125-4011.40-1.50: , :High ------:0.241 ! ; 0.2-0.6 10.19-0.21:7.9-8.4,1 <2 :Moderate 10.241 ! ' 146-64; 5-1011.6.-1.701 6.0-20 10.05-0.08!7.9-8.4 1 <2 :Low------- ;0.15! 1 ! 1 ! 1 ! 1 , Haw-------------; 0-14:10-2011.35-1.45: 0.6-2.0 :0.16-0.2116.1-7.8 ! <2 Mow ------- 10.43: 5 ! 6 ! 2-4 114-30122-3011.40-1.601 0.2-0.6 10.14-0.2116.1-8.4 1 <2 ;Moderate 10.37; i 130-38!10-1511.50-1.60 6.0-20.010.11-0.1817.4-9.0 1 <2 !Low ------- 10.28; i ; 138-64: 2-7 11.60-1.701 >20 10.03-0.08:7.4-9.0 1 <2 :Low ------- ;0.15! i See footnote at end of table. ,ez *`rsg p x r, r, United States Soil Department of Conservation Agriculture Service Subject: SOIL - 430 - IWMRP - 12 - ENG -- 13 To: ,eland Holstlne District Conservationist Soil Conservation Service P. 0. Box 421 Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Soils Information - ABO Series P.O. Boas 802 Mountain Home, Idaho 83647 Date: July 14, 1982 I am sending you the attached material in regard to yourhone request of July 6, 1982 on interpretive data for the ABO Series. This information was copied from the tables in the ADA County Area Soil Survey Manual on which I have noted important items to consider. The proposal, as I understand it, is to construct single family dwellings on this soil utilizing wooden footings of foundations. A problem is created in making interpretations as our tables and criteria are for concrete .footings (See the enclosed rating cri- teria from See. 4O3.2(b) of the National Soils Handbook). How- ever, by looking at some individual data we can make some assump- tions and predictions about suitability for construction of build- ings on sites where AB© Soil Series occurs. The first thing to consider is the water table indicated in Table 15 (page 319). The depth of the inherent water table fluctuates between 36 and, 60 inches, The soil profile on pages 136 and 137 shows mottles occurring within 17 incises of the soil surface in- dicating capillary movement or actual water table wetness occurring high in the profile at some time. If footings are placed 1 1/2 to 2 feet deep they would be in an area having some degree of wetness. Also notice the PH and salinity of the soil in Table 14. My ques- tion here would be how long will the wooden footings last before rotting takes place with these soil conditions. In Table 7 (page 206) the ABO Soil Series is rated severe for dwellings without basements due to flooding. If we assume the area is protected from flgoding this rating would become. slight. How- ever, this rating is for a concrete foundation, Also, note the moderate rating for shallow excavations in the same Table. 0VThe Soil Conservation Service is an agency of the Department of Agriculture SCS -AS -3 10-79 s £ Y y 4"p .' z Meridian City Council July 15, 1982 Page Two #3. Soil Tyke. Soil type criteria as applied to AWWF is the same as those which apply to concrete foundations. UBC Standard No. 29-1, Table 29-B. #4. Use of 6 mil Polyfilm over exterior of AWWF. As stated in AWWF Manual, UBC Technical Report #7 and ICBO Report #2765P, 6 mil polyfilm is only necessary when there is habitable space below grade. #5. Watertable letnels in Meadow View #2 Subdivision. I don't know what bearing this has on AWWF vs. concrete foundations. During the worst of the river, canal runoff in the end of May, we dug nine test holes throughout the subdivision. We have not had any water in any test hole. We do hit the watertable when we make our sewer line connection. However, that is standard for half of the subdivisions we build in. Attached to Vern's copy is an AWWF report on homes built on concrete and AAW in the Gulf Coast area which is subject to tropical storms. Homes built on AWWF maintain dry crawl spaces while those built on concrete did not. #6. Inspections. AWWF along with being better insulated and more waterproof, are also much easier to inspect. Everything is right there in sight with the correct code and inspection stamps, including the All Weather Wood, the joists, and even the steel plates used on the joists. In concrete foundations, the PSI strength, sack mix, slump pour and rebar schedule are rarely checked by an inspector nor is there any stamp in the concrete guarantying that it meets a certain code requirement. Two more sets of plans will be turned in the week of July 19th. I would like to build them on AWWF and not have to wait until we are scheduled into another Meridian City Council Meeting. We are now scheduling two starts per week through this summer. Again, thanks for approving the covenant changes. We know you have opened yourselves up to other covenant change requests. If we can help you in any way with ordinance requirements to guar- antee the quality and energy efficiency of the smaller homes that will be built, please call us. Both Megan Morgan and I are on various state and national committees that are working to solve these problems. cc; City Inspector City Engineer City Clerk ✓ �' �xs ' I 3 x :iix �� S � ✓ +a M1,�' j a � k (g R 2 F', h } 3 5 } w yd i 0 *� y� 2 �i 3 F-. yam¢ t 9 4 SECOND AMENDMENT OF DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR MEADOW VIEW NO. 2 SUBDIVISION July 1, 1982 WHEREAS, SHERWOOD & ROBERTS, INC., A Washington Corporation has acquired MEADOW VIEW NO. 2 SUBDIVISION from ALLEN-MONTEE, an Idaho General Partnership comprised of Roger H. Allen and Kenneth D. Montee and shall hereinafter be referred to as the new "Declarant". WHEREAS, the new Declarant desires to amend said Declaration in the following particulars: 1) ARTICLE I. Section 4 shall be deleted and in its place the following ARTICLE I, Section 4 shall be substituted in lieu thereof: ARTICLE I, Section 4.: "Declarant" shall mean and refer to SHERWOOD & ROBERTS, INC., A Washington Corporation, its successors and assigns. 2) Delete ARTICLE II, Section 1(b) and in its place the following ARTICLE II, Section 1(b) shall be substituted in lieu thereof: rr ARTICLE II, Section 1(b): No Dwelling shall be erected, placed or permitted to remain on any Lot other than a single-family dwelling not to exceed two stories in height and a private garage for not less than two (2) cars in a minimum of 70% of the homes and not less than one (1) car in a maximum of 30% of the homes. The use of any Lot for multi-family'Dwelling Units is prohibited. The minimum square footage of a Dwelling Unit construction on a Lot within the subdivision, exclusive of open porches and patios and the garaae area, shall be as follows: A. No Houses may be construction under 900 square feet. B. Ten Percent (10%) of the Dwelling constructed within the development may have -a square footage under 1000 square'feet. C. Twenty Percent (20%) of the Dwellings constructed within the development may have a square footage between 1000 and 1100'sq. D. Forty Percent (40%) of the Dwellings constructed within the development may have a square footage between 1100 and 1200 sq. E. Thirty Percent (30%) of the Dwellings construction within tthe development may have a square footage between 1200 and 130Q_4q. The ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE as designated below in ARTICLE shall have the authority to designate and intersperse the Dwellings and IV Lots accordingly for the purpose of harmony of design with existing or previously approved structures. 3) ARTICLE III, Paragraph (b) shall be amended to read as follows: (b) For the use and benefit of each Lot (hereafter called "dominant Lo" on which the Architectural Control Committee has approved a zero lot -line t ) dwelling not abutting or attached to the dwelling on the adjacent Lot and Owner thereof, an express and exclusive easement(s) on, over and across t the Lot(s) he (hereafter called "servient lot") contiguous to and abutting the dominant lot as follows: (i) An easement for ingress and egress to repair or maintain an portion of the installed or constructed improvements on the y dominant lot when reasonable access thereto is not available from the dominant lot itself; ft. ft. ft. (ii) An easement not to exceed five (5) feet for eaves and other portions of the building integral to the improvements located on the dominant lot projecting beyond the lot line dividing the dominant lot and the servient lot, provided that such eaves and other projections shall be at a height that shall not unreasonably interfere with the use of the servient lot by the Owner thereof and, provided further that the eaves and other projections shall have been approved by the Architectural Control Committee. No building or structure shall be placed or permitted to remain on any easement area within any Lot, and no other activities shall be undertaken on any Lot which will interfere with the access and use intended to be provided by said easement or the installation or maintenance of the facilities located therein. The areas within each easement on a Lot shall be maintained by the Owner thereof, except for any portion thereof which is the responsibility of the user of the easement. 4) ARTICLE IV, Paragraphs (a) and (b) are hereby amended and shall hereafter read as follows: ARTICLE IV: ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE (a) The Architectural Control Committee shall be composed of the following persons: W. Tom Birch 1755 Westgate Drive Boise, ID. 83704 Timothy J. Sullivan, Jr. 1755 Westgate Drive Boise, ID. 83704 Kathy Tealey 1755 Westgate Drive Boise, ID. 83704 Dan Cada 14 7705 Iron Court Boise, ID. 83704 Until changed by majority of the Committee, dsign as its representative to act for it. In the event�ofodeath cor�resignationdof any member pf the Committee, the remaining members hsall have the full authority to designate a successor. The members of the Committee shall not be entitled to any compensation for services performed in connection with their responsibilities. At any time, the then record Owners of a majority of the Lots shall have the power through a duly recorded written instrument to change the membership of the Committee or to withdraw from the Committee or to restore to it any Of its powers and duties. (b) Prior to commencing any work or building requiring the approval of said committee, there shall be submitted to the Committee one complete set of plans and specifications for any and all proposed improvements and no work or construction shall commence until the final plans, elevations and specifications therefor have received written approval by the Committee. Such plans shall also include plot plans showing the location on the Lot of the building, fence, wall or other structure proposed to be constructed, altered, placed, or maintained, together with the proposed construction material, color schemes or roofs and exteriors thereof and proposed landscape planning. Energy performance calculations will be required by the Committee. Other energy conservation items to be considered by the Committee in determinin whether to approve the plans and specifications are air infiltration m g such as caulking gaskets exterior sill plates to concrete slabs or foundation walls, insulating ductwork, water heaters, and installing insulating ask measures all switch and outlet covers, caulking electrical and plumbing holes through exterior walls, insulated closeable foundation vents, exteriorbehind maximum insulation values and overall insulation standards. Thercommittfor ee will require minimum R -Values of 18 - walls, 38 - ceiling, and 11- crawlsace The Committee also will require a written warranty from the builder on the protection of their home. -2- The Committee shall approve or disapprove plans and specifications within thirty (30) days from the receipt thereof, or shall notify the person submitting them that an additional period of time, not to exceed thirty (30) days is required for such approval or disapproval. Plans and specifications not approved or disapproved within the time limits provided herein, shall be approved as submitted. The approval of plans and specifications by the Committee does not relieve the Owner of the necessity of obtaining a building permit(s) from those government entities having jurisdiction and control over the properties. Notwithstanding the approval by the Committee, each Owner submitting such plans or specifications shall be solely responsible for the sufficiency thereof. Further, neither the Declarant nor the members of the Committee shall be liable for any loss or damage or claim thereof arising from any defect or alleged defect in such plans and specifications or the construction or use thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has caused this Second Amendment to be executed the day and year first above written. SHERWOOD & ROBERTS, INC. W. Tom Birch, Asst. Vice President State of Idaho) ss. County of Ada ) On this day of JULY, 1982, before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared W. Tom Birch, known to me to be the Assistant Vice President of Sherwood & Roberts, Inc., A Washington Corporation, that executed the instrument and the person who executed said instrument on behalf of said Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my'official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for Idaho Residing at Boise, Idaho b Irt, T Vp Z TT c S � Q O v. o c o C I \ 1 �1 h"� 7 -n3 w 4c itf b Irt, T Vp Z TT c S � Q O o c o Meridian City Hall 10. Item #7 Cont°d - Counci1man Rick Orton Affordable f?ousing �. Councilman Orton requested per ussion from the Council cases that he knew of. (Tape )n File) Kingsford suggested that Orton get some type of waver o then bring it back to the Cour -il for the go ahead. (T, Dan Cada commented on the all weather wood foundations Cada requested to come before he Council in August ani+ foundations. Cada cited sever 1 associations that accel Cada stated that the wood foun.ation would not require Being there no other business :) come before the Council The Motion was made by Kingsfo;? and seconded by Tolsma at 9:35 P.M. Motion Carried: Kingsforc, yea; Tolsma, yea; Orton La L. Nie City Clerk July 6, 1982 ,irsue this matter, for two i >ility from the PLnnbing Boal m File) 'rape on. File) ue the all weather wood e all -weather wood foundai .dance. (Tape on File) the meeting be adjourned a; Brewer, yea ;SEPH GLAISYER t} • 'u+v y x Cox' Y 2 Y tYt '#S.i :7 i�. . r } A , w HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY r } P i "'4 VY" A Good Place to Uve k N OFFICIALS LAWANA ICY`" 0 MERIDIAN COUNCILMEN ,l .3 L. NIEMANN, City Clerk" A. M. KIEBERT, Treasurer GRANT P. KINGSFORD BILL BREWER G RICHARD D. NICHOLS, Chief of Police 728 Mer; than street RICHARD F. ORTON, JR. ;. tr" - ,, yd��• >K , r� iY , BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN O. FITZGERALD, Attorney RONALD R. TOLSMA MERIDL.N IDAHO " ROGER WELKER, Fire Chief 13642 ANNETTE C. HINRICHS EARL WARD, Waste Water Supt. Phon, 888-4433 Chairman Zoning &Planning z. ul JOSEPH I . GLAISYER Mayor June 4, 1982 f -1:a .' NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho, that a hearing will be held before the City Council of the City of Meridian, at the City Ball in the City of Meridian at the hour of 7:30 P.M. on the 6th day of July, 1982 for the purpose of setting the square footage requirements for each lot of MEADOW VILV SUBDIVISION NO. 2 which is located within the City of Meridian, County of Ada., State of j Idaho. Any and all parties interested shall be heard at the above scheduled hearing. DATED this 4th day of June, 1982 9 LaWana L..Niemann, City Clerk 9V Pub. June 16, 23, 1982 M t} • 'u+v y x Cox' Y 2 Y tYt '#S.i :7 i�. . r } g x_ w 5 T r } P i "'4 VY" G C { .w JK# G s P� F �l dez �t �S� `� ° � J$ � P 7 i,. qk ,, yd��• >K , r� iY Y _Y 0 J ial Meeting - Meridian Cil February 26, 1981 Special meeting called to order by Mayor Joseph L. Glaisyer at 7:30 P.M. Councilmen present: Richard Williams; Grant Kingsford; Bill Brewer; Rick Orton Jr. Others attending: Mr. and Mrs. James Tully; Ken Montee; Ray Kellogg; Lee Stucker; Foe Stucker; J. R. Kellogg; Phil Harper; Bill Manfull; Joe Simminich; Val McLamm; deal Eagar enda 1 Meadow View #2 - Square footage requirements Hearing Ken Montee was present to display Meadow View #2 Final Plat designating percentage square footage on each lot. Mayor: "Public Hearing is now open" Montee: "I am here to ask approval of Meadow View Subdivision No. 2 minimum square footages and I have a change in the restrictive covenants which specifies the square footages per lot." Montee displays map before Council. "There are ten (10) 11000 nineteen (19) 1,100; thirty-nine (39) 1,200 and the rest are 1,300 square feet." Williams: "One suggestion off the subject if I may, in this area (indicating south- west area of the old sewer treatment plant) we are proposing that a neighborhood park be established, and we are working with Boise State regarding this - a park that would be a benefit to the whole neighborhood and to the property in here (Meadow View #2). When we get this project further along I would hope we could work with you*dn this park so you would have an idea what we are trying to accomplish. If possible, if we do develop a park, we could perhaps find someway of having access through here (indicates lots adjacent to park proposal). This is not a request but to find out if you people would be interested. Montee: "The draw back would be the narrow lots. If we do anything we would have to do it right away, because we have sold the lots" There was discussion concerning access to the future park from Chateau Drive area and sidewalks. It was decided that the lots were too tight for access. Mayor Glaisyer: Are there any comments from the public attendance concerning Meadow View Subdivision No. 2?" Joe Simminich: "I'm Joe Simmintch and I am concerned about the irrigation system. I came here a few months ago and I asked you people to do something about it, or asked what you could do, I talked to Ken Montee - the irrigation box is still cut open and this summer the irrigation water will flood my property.. I cannot get anything done on it." There was much discussion concerning the responsibility of correcting the flooding problem. Montee: "Settlers Irrigation and our Engineer agreed upon a plan to cut a hole in this box (indicating east box) and drain it into 5 Mile Creek. Our Engineers informed us that BOR had an easement across here and it was their land. Two or three months later we found out that it was Mr. Simminich's land. H & K Contractors have been contacted to repair but cannot until it is less muddy.. We have hired H & K to fix or finish it. There is a problem getting it tapped into a storm drain system. It is an overflow problem, it really doesn,t have anything to do with us - the problem was there before the Subdivision was even thought of. We are going to close in the hole and hopefully tap into the storm drain. We did dig a ditch across his property and we did not know it was private property." Williams: "The City of Meridian has no control of irrigation - we do not have any- thing to do with this - we can't do anything." Montee: "We have an agreement with Settlers and the Engineer for this property to cooperate and make correction - we apologize, how it is going to be solved will be approved for Settlers Irrigation." Mayor: "Any more comments from the public?" There was none. The Motion was made by Orton and seconded by Williams that they approve Meadow View Number Two (2) proposed square footage requirements as presented, ten lots at 1,000 sq. feet; nineteen at 1,100 sq. feet; thirty-nine at 1,200 sq. feet and the remaining of Meadow View Plumber 2 Subdivision lots at 1,300 square feet. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea €[xq. e�43 -1 i YJ A w%. t r s at, Y m k t3 k r €[xq. e�43 -1 x, t s at, r� m k t3 k r r" rgy saving homes • once 7705 IRON COURT BOISE, IDAHO 83704 (208) 362-9000 pSS�g�A110N of NO r 0 Of the UNITED SAWAES I M E A D O W V I E W N 0. 2 S U B D I V I S I O N r e�43 -1 x� r� m k r" ;s s i �m rgy saving homes • once 7705 IRON COURT BOISE, IDAHO 83704 (208) 362-9000 pSS�g�A110N of NO r 0 Of the UNITED SAWAES I M E A D O W V I E W N 0. 2 S U B D I V I S I O N r i { i tF W3 CONTENTS PAGE x I. GOAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 III. ADA COUNTY HOUSING HISTORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 IV . NEED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 V. PRODUCT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 VI. PROPOSAL . R APPENDIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Al y TABLES RESIDENTIAL BUILDING STARTS, ADA COUNTY . . . . 2 IDAHO POPULATION GROWTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 a PRICE RANGE HOMES SOLD, ADA COUNTY 1981 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 "PERCENTAGE OF ALL SOLD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES BY PRICE RANGE, 1982 . . . . . . . 6 F i The increased cost of energy, along with the causes mentioned earlier, has contributed to this phenomenon. Energy Saving Homes, Inc. has developed a line of homes that will address these problems. These homes continue to reflect the quality construction ESH, Inc. is known for, as well as offer superior energy efficiency -- as our trademark denotes. ESH, Inc. has been in the residential construction business for over five years, building quality, energy -conserving homes in many locations throughout Ada County. While most of the new homes have been of conventional energy -conserving design, ESH, Inc. has become a leader in passive solar construction as well. These homes have ranged in price from $55,000 to $230,000. Our people have many years of combined expertise in building, financing, business management, promotion, and energy-efficient/ solar construction. The experience of the corporation's per- sonnel combines to provide a unique and effective system of checks and balances to insure quality -constructed, appealingly -sellable, energy-efficient homes. Current business and accounting procedures are designed to eliminate waste and avoid construction overruns for optimum cost and quality control. See Appendix I for cor- porate structure and personnel profiles. III. ADA COUNTY HOUSING HISTORY Housing starts in Ada County, as well as the nation as a whole, has been declining steadily for the last fiVe years. The following table shows the housing starts in Ada County per year, along with the reasons for that decline. YEAR ACTUAL STARTS 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 TABLE 1 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING STARTS ADA COUNTY • 2500 Good times resulting in over- building. 2200 Slight reduction due to 1977 over construction. 1700 Decline due to Southwestern Idaho Moratorium and beginning of W. ro Continued usary tax problems and rising interest rates nationwide. 407 Continued increasing interest k rates virtually shuts down resi- X� dential construction. O � nk The increased cost of energy, along with the causes mentioned earlier, has contributed to this phenomenon. Energy Saving Homes, Inc. has developed a line of homes that will address these problems. These homes continue to reflect the quality construction ESH, Inc. is known for, as well as offer superior energy efficiency -- as our trademark denotes. ESH, Inc. has been in the residential construction business for over five years, building quality, energy -conserving homes in many locations throughout Ada County. While most of the new homes have been of conventional energy -conserving design, ESH, Inc. has become a leader in passive solar construction as well. These homes have ranged in price from $55,000 to $230,000. Our people have many years of combined expertise in building, financing, business management, promotion, and energy-efficient/ solar construction. The experience of the corporation's per- sonnel combines to provide a unique and effective system of checks and balances to insure quality -constructed, appealingly -sellable, energy-efficient homes. Current business and accounting procedures are designed to eliminate waste and avoid construction overruns for optimum cost and quality control. See Appendix I for cor- porate structure and personnel profiles. III. ADA COUNTY HOUSING HISTORY Housing starts in Ada County, as well as the nation as a whole, has been declining steadily for the last fiVe years. The following table shows the housing starts in Ada County per year, along with the reasons for that decline. YEAR ACTUAL STARTS 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 TABLE 1 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING STARTS ADA COUNTY • 2500 Good times resulting in over- building. 2200 Slight reduction due to 1977 over construction. 1700 Decline due to Southwestern Idaho Moratorium and beginning of usary tax problems. - 1100 Continued usary tax problems and rising interest rates nationwide. 407 Continued increasing interest k rates virtually shuts down resi- X� dential construction. fir. ...k 4WUN , E k X� O � nk ' 4i4 IV. NEED This unprecedented period of economic decline has made' builders and developers realize that something must be done to make homes more affordable -- both in original cost and in monthly expenses i.e., heating and cooling. 3 2 h� Y �� rG f This five year decline in residential construction has resulted in many builders, developers, and industry -related businesses going bankrupt. As a result, an important tax base wr for Ada County Cities has been seriously eroded. The job base as well as the property tax base has been jeapordized. There is _ a tremendous backlog of empty lots -- over 700 in Meridian alone. ' = And, there has been no appreciable decrease in their numbers in recent months. Locally, the Boise Board of Realtors Sold Book for the �.: first quarter of 1982 shows the following data: d NEW HOMES - MERIDIAN AREA 4 Sold in 1982 -- Price average $51,300 Avg. Gross Square Foot tb 1017, at (50.44) P/Sq/Ft. RESALE OF EXISTING HOMES IN MERIDIAN AREA 17 Sold in 1982 -- Price Average $54,500 Avg. Gross Square Foot ;. 1240 (44 .00) P/Sq/Ft MERIDIAN PRICE RANGE BREAK DOWN F3 , � 12.5% of sales in price range of $25,000 to $39,999 28.3% of sales in price range of $40,000 to $54,999 31.1% of sales in price range of $55,000 to $69,999 In the Meridian area 58.8% of "existing" residential proper- ties (10 units) sold in a price range of $40,000 to'$54,999. The remaining 41.2% (7 units) were in the price range of $55,000 . to $69,999. ., ,. The above information demonstrates the current market in Meridian and the price range of homes Meridian residents can afford. However, it also demonstrates that the options for new home purchases are severely limited due to restrictive square footage minimums within the City of Meridian. i* x .:" The average cost of a new home per square foot in Ada County .r .� is $55. With average home prices at this rate and going higher, few can qualify for the larger homes of the past. IV. NEED This unprecedented period of economic decline has made' builders and developers realize that something must be done to make homes more affordable -- both in original cost and in monthly expenses i.e., heating and cooling. 3 -A CD O .1 CD 4 .O CD O' O —L CD N 0 N O -4 O I} r -A -A N N N O co O N A 7i'K c 'CO O v "i -A CD O .1 CD 4 .O CD O' O —L CD N 0 N O -4 O I} r -A -A N N N O co O N A 7i'K c 'CO O jV A "i s �Fi O O O O O O O O O O O O ® O O p O -A CD O .1 CD 4 .O CD O' O —L CD N 0 N O -4 O 4 H r m N -A -A -A N N N O co O N A a) 'CO O jV A Co O O O O O O O O O O O O ® O O p O O O CD O p O O O O p O O O 4 H r m N The Census Bureau indicates that Idaho will be the seventh fastest growing state in the nation for the next ten years and that Ada County will be one of the fastest growing counties in the state. See Table 2. The Ada County area has a large segment of potential new home buyers. Most people traditionally rent first when new in the area. This has become more than a standard practice because of the high interest rates. Out-of-state people must also wait for their old homes to sell before purchasing a new one. The following Tables indicate the degree of pent up demand in Ada County. Of the total of all properties sold in Ada County in 1981, 8.9% were in the $25,000 - $39,999 range, 33.3% 2343 in the $40,000 - $54,999 range. PRICE RANGE HOMES SOLD ADA COUNTY 1981 TABLE 3 A - .6% H - 3.0% A - UNDER $24,999 - $25,000-39,999 C - $40,000-54,999 D - $55,000-69,999 E - $70,000-84,999 F - $85,000-99,999 G - $100,000-124;999 H - $125,000&OVER The first quarter of this year reflects this trend. 12.5% were in the $25,000 - $39,999 and 28.3% were in the $40,000 - $54,999 range as shown in Table 4. 5 Y z The Census Bureau indicates that Idaho will be the seventh fastest growing state in the nation for the next ten years and that Ada County will be one of the fastest growing counties in the state. See Table 2. The Ada County area has a large segment of potential new home buyers. Most people traditionally rent first when new in the area. This has become more than a standard practice because of the high interest rates. Out-of-state people must also wait for their old homes to sell before purchasing a new one. The following Tables indicate the degree of pent up demand in Ada County. Of the total of all properties sold in Ada County in 1981, 8.9% were in the $25,000 - $39,999 range, 33.3% 2343 in the $40,000 - $54,999 range. PRICE RANGE HOMES SOLD ADA COUNTY 1981 TABLE 3 A - .6% H - 3.0% A - UNDER $24,999 - $25,000-39,999 C - $40,000-54,999 D - $55,000-69,999 E - $70,000-84,999 F - $85,000-99,999 G - $100,000-124;999 H - $125,000&OVER The first quarter of this year reflects this trend. 12.5% were in the $25,000 - $39,999 and 28.3% were in the $40,000 - $54,999 range as shown in Table 4. 5 TABLE PERCENTAGE OF ALL SOLD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES BY PRICE RANGE 1982 UNDER $25,000 1.9 % $25,000 - 39,999 - g $40,000 - $54,999 , 28.3 X $55,000 - $69,999 vi $70,00_0 - S84,999 nCy u 5.9 % 5100,000_$124L999 5.5 % 5125000 - $149,999 .7 % S150L000_$1991999 1.1 % 5200,000 _5249,999_ .3 % _ $250,000 & OVER .0 X ffir TABLE PERCENTAGE OF ALL SOLD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES BY PRICE RANGE 1982 UNDER $25,000 1.9 % $25,000 - 39,999 - 12.5 % $40,000 - $54,999 , 28.3 X $55,000 - $69,999 31.1 % $70,00_0 - S84,999 12.2 % $85,000 - $99,999 ' 5.9 % 5100,000_$124L999 5.5 % 5125000 - $149,999 .7 % S150L000_$1991999 1.1 % 5200,000 _5249,999_ .3 % _ $250,000 & OVER .0 X It should be noted that these figures could have been sub- stantially greater had the inventory in these price ranges been available. Nevertheless, Table 4 indicates that 40.80 of the new home buyers in Ada County required new homes in the price range Energy Saving Homes, Inc. proposes to build in Meadow View No. 2 Subdivision. New housing in today's market is a concept of affordability. If a potential buyer can afford the down payment and monthly payment, the buyer's thoughts are more tuned to paycheck and cash flow. There are several new mortgage instrumeftts which help stimulate the market for new homes in these price ranges. Idaho Housing funds and its five per cent down will enable most renters and first-time buyers to get into new homes. VA, GPM. and Adj.ust- abl� Rate Mortgages will be equally attractive. 11 The fact reamins, however, that Meridian lost 4.4% of the total market volume in Ada County the first quarter of this year as compared to the same quarter in 1981 and the average sell price decreased by $4,613. Therefore, in order to recapture the market and create a sound tax base, a superior product must be offered at a much more attractive price. The need for smaller, more affordable homes has been graph- ically illustrated above and is substantiated by several national surveys on the subject. A survey conducted by the National Asso- ciation of Home Builders in January 1981 showed new home buyers were demanding energy-efficient homes as their number one priority. A more recent survey conducted by the National Board of Realtors found price to be the number one consideration with energy efficiency running a close second. R All the national surveys by various groups have pointed out that the home of the 1980's will be built smaller, on less ground, and more energy efficient. There are two major factors which will force homes to be smaller and to occupy less land. The first is cost. Cost of materials, cost of labor and cost of land, etc. which will no doubt rise considerably as the industry begins to recover from its long slump. The second factor is the changing demographics of potential new home buyers. Demographic analysis of the American population supports the notion that the building industry will, in fact, experience a revitalization but, with distinct differences from previous years. Leading the list of population changes is the fact that the post World War II baby boom has reached the home buying age. And, must have shelter. Secondly, the number of unmarried couple households has tripled during the last ten years. Thirdly, mar- ried couples are having smaller families. And, fourth, life expectancy is increasing -- meaning more empty nesters (couples whose children have grown and left home). V. PRODUCT The question then, is why aren't more builders supplying this need? There are many reasons. ti Affordability ,� ; t " #� ,, or reduce costs is something that builders have been doing con- �4 K%g 7 F �Y All the national surveys by various groups have pointed out that the home of the 1980's will be built smaller, on less ground, and more energy efficient. There are two major factors which will force homes to be smaller and to occupy less land. The first is cost. Cost of materials, cost of labor and cost of land, etc. which will no doubt rise considerably as the industry begins to recover from its long slump. The second factor is the changing demographics of potential new home buyers. Demographic analysis of the American population supports the notion that the building industry will, in fact, experience a revitalization but, with distinct differences from previous years. Leading the list of population changes is the fact that the post World War II baby boom has reached the home buying age. And, must have shelter. Secondly, the number of unmarried couple households has tripled during the last ten years. Thirdly, mar- ried couples are having smaller families. And, fourth, life expectancy is increasing -- meaning more empty nesters (couples whose children have grown and left home). V. PRODUCT The question then, is why aren't more builders supplying this need? There are many reasons. Q`. V M ti Affordability ,� ; t First, affordability of product -- There is not some simple #� magical way to reduce construction costs. Trying to maintain or reduce costs is something that builders have been doing con- tinually. Competition demands it. ESH, Inc. has approached a this reduction in construction costs in several areas over the last 18 months. We how have a quality product well under area competition. 4. The following is a very select few of the Optimum Value Engineering (OVE) techniques which we utilize to insure a better product at an affordable price. The OVE Handbook designed by HUD and NAHB constitutes an entire manual. '-. -- Framing. To reduce the amount of lumber and labor time involved in .framing (without decreasing struc- tural integrity). We are following the OVE q - guidelines. The end result is an approximate 16% decrease in the amount of lumber and habor cif �A" use in framing. That 16% decrease in lumber, however, allows for an increase in insulation for better energy conservation. 7• Q`. V M X 3 6 �k -- Foundation and Floor System. We are utilizing the new Bowen Floor Joist System which replaces both the floor joists and concrete foundation walls. We reduce material and labor costs, =' decrease construction time and have more flexibility to build during winter or rainy fi conditions. }} Ceiling Trusses. Changes in the ceiling truss design r ";. has facilitated greater speed of installation as well as less soffic and facia labor. > -- Sheetrock. New installation techniques and greater use of clips have decreased time and lumber used for backing. 1,W -- Heating System. A Central Core design has been utilized � to decrease cost and increase efficiency of air delivery. ;tw -- Fast Track Scheduling. Closer and tighter control of scheduling has been instituted in order to maintain quality while greatly reducing con- struction time. � s Second, affordability of land. We cannot build 800 to 1000 square foot homes on large lots and maintain any resemblance to affordability to an appreciable segment of the Idaho population. Developers and governmental units have been handling this problem :. with higher density subdivisions and new development techniques. _ Energy Efficiency '' Because of the OVE framing, we are able to replace the 16% xa reduction in lumber .with greater insulation. f" Using the Bowen floor system, we are able to use R 11 >`.x= fiberglass batt insulation in the crawl space wall. We use high R exterior sheathing in place of asphalt impregnated board to greatly decrease infiltration through the wall and increase wall � R value to 19. With the new roof truss we are using we are able g :r. to install 8 inches of insulation over the outside top plates in >; place of the typical 3cinches. Our ceiling R factor is 38. Our homes have an electric spark ignition gas furnace. The air delivery duct system is fully insulated. The hot water tank and furnace are located in the center of the home for shorter run water and duct lines as well as extra energy value. � m X �k y� }} i; Due to the change in ownership of this Subdivision, the pre- sent composition of the Architectural Control Committee is no longer acceptable. It is requested that the Architectural Con- trol Committee be changed to reflect this new ownership. The proposed new members of the Committee would be: W. Tom Birch, Timothy J. Sullivan, Jr., Kathy Tealy, and Dan Cada. The Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions should be further modified to include the desire for extremely quality -conscious construction and energy efficient -housing. Therefore, before written approval is granted by the Architectural Control Committee for construction in the Subdivision, all final plans and specifications must be submitted. In addition to the current information required to be submitted, it is proposed that an energy analysis of each home be submitted. All homes must be covered by an approved home owner warranty and must meet or exceed insulation standards of R 18 walls, R 38 ceiling, and R 11 crawl space. a r 1'0 owner/manager of three separate small Idaho businesses. She has also served as Accountant and Credit Representative for the City of San Diego, California. She has lived and operated her businesses in Idaho for the past twenty-three years. Financial Consultant Maurice Clifton is currently Associate Broket at City Realty in Boise. He has been in the Real Estate business for five and a half years with a brokers license and GRI designation (Graduate Realtors Institute). He is a State of Idaho licensee with four years experience teaching Finance and Essentials to Realtors. He is a member of the Million Dollar Club of the Boise Board of Realtors. He has fourteen and a half years banking experience and is a former Vice President and Real Estate Loan Department Manager of a major Boise bank. Job Supervisor Charles Gowing, is experienced in all phases of construction, carpentry, framing, masonry, and landscaping. He has been in the residential construction industry for over five years. He is charged with on-site job supervision of subcontractors and suppliers for further quality control 0 0 9 A2 I 71—W I Ag ad cli 0 _0 r� MOM 1 n70 Yr. III P 4Y- V mm W m m „ 0 a o z 2 I m to Z W Y u O 1 I �` - 1_ —• -� G W m r Z Q c m CO c o_ V m a d o Q O F- s m m m m m m aci d m A o (� 5 W O WCC j W H 7 it P 7 tun CW `= o01D 0 a a z N 4.890098 888 0098 •Nb 1 - 1 — --- --,�� --- -- - W C4 CP — ► - ,ye a )O I '04 !v ov0 j I 1 'NS : - i - ti 1 fro Anv v15in I N T b Ib')s 191 r is 113n J '.00a , . Qtl s � i is Otiv r,JNt - I}0 tl J tl nj , r Q I ! — �b ds Q 1 708 ON. I �,,•r••�' ,:l.,rrr'— I 0o - z 30Ms3soo" J( Olt 1 mr ]At A ON II n l wn N 3eO t? a v O v Z a Q p 3nOn9 .n.'OI � 2 W 1 7N 11N= 11 is O w Z d L O T r ;145 r a ® j a W 3 V = Nl 3A 1VA 2 o t o a � A H Qb Z tlV15 O 'NS 1 ab vav • Nv) Nb'1 h a l 4Rift i7rT4 1 gW # t x 9 � S 3 � Fri MINIM- 7 3' w�i4 d" . , Im I MIN ..... ..... ..... . . . . 9111 . . a l 4Rift i7rT4 1 gW # t x 9 � S 3 � Fri 7 3' w�i4 d" . , 61 rp N N a, o W _ W 0 ~ga a 7 V Z N Ou 2 .A F 0 Z ¢� 5� a f=oo N �oWa N aje'�c a •�'I, r�.�rr11/II m .99 ♦99 i 0 •/ 11.1.E":' ? 7n41+1r- - •'+—'i..r.rss— — -- to AM nD AL0 14 ry'1 v I i ° '. - .•' ,00 OL 3.,09.1 9 .: ti b a ,11 7r rrr 1W go Ing O311d1dN(1 m ;e � o TY � '� .iL 0ei1 M„01,11 e1 N • a r 1. I?” . SO -. +I• .. I» • al' •!.�i a S t h W W AID r •. 1.. . /. e r >J 1 • •1 Laa. Y h 90 ^ �0 No _ 41 SI re m -�rIsla• � >. .. ,�_.r��..'IT�-1--�...1'. t• N ,'$ If 0 �e I a �W. -- . .4 4' IN CD w 14 F 1 1 a W % U f lir, ?- J W a3aL`---� ]' �1 t r ,. ;� i i r.1=il Z W 1;;313s"el:: an Z •t•1 j 9•'. .111 _. oo, �- c Y ' �' N W as L.- 00098 3..Ht 1.1 I�Oi s �A NOISIA10ens M31A MOOd3W A (,, . t 5 is m 61 rp N N a, o W _ W 0 ~ga a 7 V Z N Ou 2 .A F 0 Z ¢� 5� a f=oo N �oWa N aje'�c a •�'I, r�.�rr11/II m .99 ♦99 i 0 •/ 11.1.E":' ? 7n41+1r- - •'+—'i..r.rss— — -- to AM nD AL0 14 ry'1 v I i ° '. - .•' ,00 OL 3.,09.1 9 .: ti b a ,11 7r rrr 1W go Ing O311d1dN(1 m ;e � o TY � '� .iL 0ei1 M„01,11 e1 N • a r 1. I?” . SO -. +I• .. I» • al' •!.�i a S t h W W AID r •. 1.. . /. e r >J 1 • •1 Laa. Y h 90 ^ �0 No _ 41 SI re m -�rIsla• � >. .. ,�_.r��..'IT�-1--�...1'. t• N ,'$ If 0 �e I a �W. -- . .4 4' IN CD w 14 F 1 1 a W % U f lir, ?- J W a3aL`---� ]' �1 t r ,. ;� i i r.1=il Z W 1;;313s"el:: an Z •t•1 j 9•'. .111 _. oo, �- c Y ' �' N W as L.- 00098 3..Ht 1.1 I�Oi s �A NOISIA10ens M31A MOOd3W A a PUEST FOR SUBDIVISIOU APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: 1. See City policy statement, Submission Requirements, Appendix I. 2. A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request was made. 4. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P.M., Thursday following the Planning and.Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision, NALADoguiyi w #'2 5099. 2. General location, WEST CP e)lu ff. —1 GF 1rICApOw Vt4�W # 3. Owners of record, NEW C7W Nes ?-5!1eq. A l `em Address Ro. E�px_ 1/645 Zip $3701 Telephone 345-5SOD 4. Applicant, Rogea- /s+��eN Address, .Z).X r 5. Engineer, MP►RSI)r4 � A56c;.c. Firm Address e. o, Bori 71 e7oISe 10A*io , Zip 63,101 Telephone '3114-24406 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name E72 QaL14W Address Zip 63%01 Telephone 5gSr--3500 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres 2i• 45, 2. Number of lots 92 3. Lots per acre 421 4. Density per acre 9.'M 5. Zoning classification(s) A RE,'�--W1I•lTlb►L. 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification R -A. 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt s r2 HiLem GRe@1L B. Have recreational easements been provided for `{ 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City NO i Explain += !A �At�•�l 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas?�Ip Explain For future parks? Explain (1) 1 ,a 'e .n .v. ., f •�{ ±✓;'T-,�4%�iiFh'T ��,, { p,K >..'h "�'€` s`�t'�ro yT, ,. t rh{=�.�.'x-t�`{f'" has x •' �u. � ,*, �' �; r� •� f .,f i4' M 'i' �" � T L4 k �f 5,r"'35 b f x t•_ �q g yy,� �$� �g N"Ur�§ s �d { e�r8�z7 Si %h f 2 �a q • ,°i � �, L `,� "{WTn � k ". u�"+}s" a�2.'�� r m ^icy t k i 5 yye 4a' ? �T a, r � yT, ,. t. �d { 2 " PZgUEST FOR RnLIMINARY a: Planning and Zoning Commisso continued Page 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision features continued 11. What school (s) service the area MQRrp/qw JR. 446, do you propose any agreements for future school sites klp, , Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the City Not& Water Supply Fire Department , Other , Explain 13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination), RE --I 4oeN Tl A L- 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single family, Duplexes, Multiplexes, .other sl Le Fh0A%Q? I Zeal Lot LiV1@ '91!M10 FA'mwy; 15. Proposed development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s), 5$O�� Z 6 Ludt L%aC ��►.�+ Aov*e s� b. Minimum square footage of structure(s), C. Are garages provided for, square footage d. Are other coverings provided for UNKJA0WN e. Landscaping has been provided for—Y4—:51 Describe TC) � PRIQe OUO My �e sera ._ _ f. Trees will be provided for Np , Trees will be maintained No g. Sprinkler systems are provided for NO h. Are there multiple units 130 Type , remarks i. Are there special set back requirements OS Explain FOR ZE�zo L 4- Wive 4c#.AeS Fit' kRewL NO') 51= ca' 4 s!) j. Has off street parking been provided for , Explain 2 ce a = 9e fa- eAeA4 ur► �r k. Value range of property 1W gs'g o "ra W IPSO p q, H=y e 1. Type of financing for development 104/ALL f3*�<* I AYR> FAA,/4VNVeAk. M. Protective covenants were submitted blp , Date 16. Does the proposal land lock other property Does it create Enclaves 00. STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: I. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. (2) LEGAL DESCRIPTION for MEADOW VIEW SUBD. NO. 2 A parcel of land lying in the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 1,Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, State of Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the said Southwest quarter of Section 1; thence North 0024150" West 1, 323.80 feet along the Easterly boundary of the said Southwest quarter of Section 1 to a point marking the Southeast corner of the said Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1, also said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 0024'50" West 664.65 feet along the said Easterly boundary of the Southwest quarter of Section 1 to a point; thence South 89039'50" West 402.16 feet to a point; thence North 1041'10" West 660.75 feet to a point on the Northerly boundary of the said Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section l; thence South 89048120" West 910.81 feet along the said Northerly boundary of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1, to a point marking the Northwest corner of the said Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1; thence South 0011128" East 860.00 feet along the Westerly boundary of the said Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1, to a point; thence North 70000'08" East 132.73 feet to a point; thence South 89059'52" East 419.00 feet along a line Northerly of and parallel to the said Southerly boundary of the Northeast quarter of the South- west quarter of Section 1, to a point; thence South 75024'50" East 390.22 feet to a point; thence North 89035110" East 100.00 feet to a point; thence South 0024'50" East 5.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the Southwest quarter of Section 1 to a point; thence North 89035'10" East 150.00 feet to a point; thence South 0024150" East 320.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the Southwest quarter of Section 1 to a point; thence North 89035110" East 100.00 feet to a point; thence South 0024'50" East 84.29 feet along a line 60.00 feet Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the Southwest quarter of Section 1 to a point on the said Southerly boundary of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section l; thence South 89059'52" East 60.00 feet along the said Southerly boundary of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT Ditch and Road rights-of-way. PROTECTIVE COVENANTS P RUNNING WITH LAND MEADOW VIEW Ml Dated: August 6, 1974 Recorded: November 5, 1974 Instrument No. 904930 This indenture and declaration of covenants running with the land, made this 6th day of August, 1974, by Meridian Associates and N.A.N. Inc. General Partner WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, said parties are the owners in fee of Meadow View No; 1 an addition to Ada County, Idaho , as recorded in Vdlume 33 of plats, page 2001 & 2002 , records of Ada County, which property is located in Ada County, Idaho and WHEREAS, it is the desire of said parties that said covenants be recorded and therefore IT IS HEREBY MADE KNOWN THAT said parties do by these presents make, establish, confirm and hereby impress upon Meadow View No 1 ad addition to Ada Coin y, Idaho , according to ;the plat thereof recorded is Volume r-33-1 of plats, 'page 3007 & 3W6--,xecords of Ada County, Idaho , the which property is all located in Adams County, Idaho the following protective covenants to run with said land, and •; hereby bind said parties and all of their future grantee,aasignees, and successors to said covenants for the term hereinafter stated and as follows: 1. The area covered by these covenants in the entire area described above. 2. No lot shall be used except for residential"purposes. No building shall be erected, altered, placed or permitted to remain on any lot othea� than one detached single-family dwelling not to exceed two stories in eight and a private garage for not more than two cars. 3. No dwelling shall be permitted on any lot at a cost of less tha $10,000.00 based upon cost levels prevailing on the date these covenants are recorded, it being the intention and purpose of the covenant to Instrument No. 904930 Page 2 assure that all dwellings shall be-ofa quality of workmanship and materials substantially the same or better than that which can be produced on the date these covenants are recorded at the minimum cost stated herein for the minimum {permitted dwelling size. The ground floor area of the main structure, exclusive of one-story open porches and garages, shall be not less than 780 square feet for a one-story dwelling, nor less than 700 square feet for a dwelling of more than one story of a two story building. No building shall be erected, placed, or altered on any lot until the construction plans and specifications and a plan showing the location of the,', His structure have been approved by the Architectural Control Committee ,aA. quality of workmanship and materials, harmony of external design with existing structures, and as to location with respect to topography and finish grade elevation, No fence or wall shall be erected, placed or altered on any lot nearer to any street than the minimum building setback line unless similarly approved. Approval shall be as provided in Paragraphs 4 & 5. The Architec- tural Control Committee is composed of: Name Address Merton H. Gribble 3901 120th P1. N.E. Marysville. Wash. Nancy B. Gribble 3901 120th P1. ME. Marysville, Wash. Stange L. McDonald 10099 Sa ramore Ave. Boise Idaho Ammajority of the committee may designatq-a representative to act for it. In the event of death or resignation of any member of the committee, the remaining members shall have full authority to designate a successor. Neither the members of the committee, nor its designated representative shall be entitled to any compensation for services performed pursuant to this covenant. At any time, the then record owners of a majority of the lots shall have the power througha duly recorded written instrument to change the membership of the committee or to with draw from the committee or to restore to it any of its powers and duties. 4. The Committee's approval or disapproval as required in these,,,covenants shall be in writing. In the event the committee, or its designated repre- sentative, fails to approve or disapprove within 30 days after plans and specifications have been submitted to it, or in any event, if no suit to enjoin the construction ehas been commenced prior to the completion thereof, approval will not be required and the related covenants shall be deemed to have been fully complied with.J. A: 14 5. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding on all k; parties and all persons claiming under them, unless an instrument signed by a majority of the owners of the lots has been recorded, agreeing to change said covenants in whole or in part, for a period of thitty (30) A Instrument No. 904930 Page 3 years from the date these covenants are recorded, after which time said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years. 6. No building shall be located on any lot nearer to the front lot line or nearer to the side street than the minimum building setback lines shown on the recorded plat. In any event no building shall be located on any lot nearer than 20_ feet to the front lot line, nor nearer than 20 feet to any side street line. No building shall be located nearer than S feet to an interior lot line. No dwelling shall be'"°located on any interior lot nearer than 20 feet to the rear lot line. For..the purposes of this covenant, eaves, steps and ppen porches shall not be considered as a part of a building, provided however, that this shall not be construed to permit any portion ofabuilding on a lot to encroach upon another lot. 7. Easements for installation and :maintenance of utilities and drainage facilities are reserved as shown on the recorded plat and over %the:rear seven and one-half feet and five feet wide along all lot frontages adjacent to streets. Within these easements, no structure, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to remain which may damage or interfere with the installation and maintenance of utilities, or which may change the direction of flow of'drainage channels in the easements, or which may obstruct or retard the flow of water through drainage channels in the easements. The easement area of each lot and all improvements in it shall be maintained continuously by the owner of the lot, except for those improvements for which a public authority or utility company is;.responsible. 8. No noxious shall anything or offensive activity shall be done thereon be carried on upon any lot nor nuisance to the which may be neighborhood.' or may become annoyance or 9. No stfucture of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent, shack, 4�°r'ft? garage, barn or any other outbuilding shall be used on any lot at any time as a residence, either temporarily or permanently. 10. Any dwelling or structure erected or placed on any lot in this sub- division shall be completed as to external ap erance, including finish painting, within nine (9) months from date of start on construction except for the reasons beyond control in which case a longer period may be permitted. 11. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lot ex- cept one professional sign of not more than one square foot, one sigtia of not more than five square feet advertising the property for sale or Fer .f .ao.f oo Lrent ei ynitCIC!"a .4004 1.1, a 1...; 11.. , and saies period. Y ��4t Instrument No. 904930 • Page 4 12. No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish, trash, garbage or other waste shall not be kept except in sanitary containers. All incinerators or other equipment for the storage or disposal of such material shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition. 13. No individual water supply system shall be permitted on any lot. +. No oil drilling, oil development operations, oil refining, quarrying " t, " or mining 6perations of any kind shall be permitted upon or in any lot, nor shall oil tanks4li wells, tunnels, mineral excavations or shafts be permitted upon or in any lot. No derrick or other structures designed for use in boring for oil or natural gas shall be erected, maintained or permitted upon any lot. 15. No individual sewage disposal system shall be permitted on any lot. 16. No fence, wall, hedge, or mass planting, other than foundation planting, shall be permitted to extend nearer to any street than the minimum setbhck line, except that nothing shall prevent the erection of a necessary retaining wall, the top of which does not extend more than two Meet above the finished grade at the back of said retaining wall, provided however, that no fence,wall, hedge, or mass planting shall at any time, where permitted, extend higher than five feet above ground. 17. Lot area and width. No dwelling shall be erected or placed on any lot having a width of less than 60 feet at the minimum building setback line nor shall any dwelling be erected or placed on any lot having an area of less than 6000 square feet. 18,E Enforcement shall be by proceedings at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant either to restrain violation or to reco-der damage. 19. Invalidation of any one of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no wise affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. r' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have affixed their signatures. 1 i i• ma = „r . rG 1 34 2 Sy 3 $' 4 - so•�ra+•a nis' reoa ^ ieoo� �" ieoo ZI m x•00 C . Q AA OFOR a R 2L —4 C IT -1 0 • Sz pM O O n n -= oo' ^ O a �23 q n�� m o' a ! »:48 8.88 a� m I 1 S I I g Z ��o m � �m� I au �o,mh Io ti 6000' Sacoi66 ' n I; 1 cAmn W V, oeao a n P gSSa mogQ 1 r o$R a oo'o IN o m S—c -. —.88 R a 3 a 88888888 c 8 �v•'•rr 88888.888 IRoam "'eo�w« N m ••• Yoo• p2'Om 4 n m 0p iqi / oo'X eo n 0 O I S a$�•=eae^•6 O- 7 �• 9q� n��. a C6 CL pa•♦f$M O 2 .i �00p•► vi�e°'�iY •S w CA"aiF!'L .:i - - ma = „r . rG 1 34 2 Sy 3 $' 4 - so•�ra+•a nis' reoa ^ ieoo� �" ieoo t m x•00 C . -oma Qno AA OFOR SL+ tl IT -1 0 • Sz a' 'v v n n -= oo' ma = „r . rG LINnFR {S -. 045O"onwn C7 6461, 4 1 $ : 6000 8� i ,e poo' i poo• d — N S 2 3 s N 4 a B� S � g o N ^ 3 $0 BACK L � b C . -oma Qno AA OFOR 0 12 S ¢f II 8 Sz 8 n n -= oo' a n �23 q n�� m = A »:48 8.88 o 80 1 S I I g Z ��o m � 8 LINnFR {S -. 045O"onwn C7 6461, 4 1 $ : 6000 8� i ,e poo' i poo• i N 'C S 2 3 s N 4 a B� S � g o N ^ 3 $0 BACK ^sogr�o c 3 n nom $ 6l00' 6000' 6000' 6000 6000'low OFOR 0 12 S ¢f II 8 10 8 9 8 g 87Gsw 8 n n -= oo' a n UNPLATTED ^^^ u N q 60 o0' 60oo' Boca' No0' x /6A0' 2 8 3 $0 n n n n - n nom n n vaMi•w 8. 8.46gwoo'woo' n n "_'o- n '" r12 n n n n -= n n c a n n n u n n � A »:48 8.88 o 80 1 S I I g 10 g 9 8 6000' 6000' 6000' Sacoi66 ' UNPLATTED ^^^ u N o ^^^^^^ i i u vw i i •iii •u - n :wu n n n n n n - n nom n n vaMi•w n n n n n n "_'o- n '" n n d.u:�. n n n n -= n n c a n n n u n n � A »:48 8.88 o 80 1 8 y ~ w " to 0 888�aaag cc W V, •".8� gSSa Z' r 88 —.88 88888888 8 88888.888 "'eo�w« ••• Yoo• _� oo'X eo eViO a$�•=eae^•6 pa•♦f$M vi�e°'�iY •S "•M .:i - - •o• S', _ � � ro,o-- .oi ��me -='b,'o g•'u `-06 _ �-8�"-' �d D 9 ».i.�+Si = o•vow$:wY"YoogASu� .'9 v& lk S'-°-•i'+iSoB lza X- auv�-o0o»S^i5•N��-�Yoa= p N�ru���r 0 !q 'O ' -�mv V�'m�-.�pN•". Mw��!v •' x D LS•^. � Sy _ imu�u$a°'�o"dou a•a u,iou'o,"m,m'_oo•iry o.4o mwio.o,a �$ pie w r N a N o a N i n i i 1 v f f •' t f �{ y 2� i g o i mm � Q i i u b l i !S d i i P y Zy�� 2 O V S l N 0 0 M M/ v Po JJ J S mo i- ii V� i ppi P� l N v i o A = iNq�o O o4: �o+7iv nmi .. ^iiii^ •c'� sw iFiiiiifix ^v»UNti 0::8 99 u ^„m9^ N y Now oou Vb' •+r^ v ; si I m �p ®m z .T6 D ^�' a 0 m B A Za� mO T 441 D g y O 1 Z Z y ~ w " to 0 z �A cc W V, Z' r I iORDINANCE NO. 240 0 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A_PARCEI, OF LAND LYING IN THE NEK OF THE SW)4 OF SECTION 11 T. 3N.9 R. 1W.9 B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, WHICH PROPERTY IS ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to said City certain real property which is described as follows: MEADOW VIEW NO. 2 ANNEXATION A parcel of land lying in the NES of the SWYA of Section 1, T. 3N., R. 1W.9 B.M., Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the said SWC of Section 1; thence North 0024150", Westo 19323.80 feet along the Easterly boundary of the said SVPA of Section 1 to a point marking the Southeast corner of the said NEya of the SWC of Section 1, also said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 0°2415011 West 664.65 feet along the said Easterly boundary of the SW34 of Section 1 to a point; thence South 89039150" West 402.16 feet to a point; thence North 1041,101, West 660.75 feet to a point on the Northerly boundary of the said NVA of the SVP/+ of Section 1; thence South 8904812011 best 910.81 feet along the said Northerly boundary of the NE)+ of the SVA of Section 1 to a point marking the Northwest corner of the said NES of the SW!A of Section 1; thence South 001112811 East 860 XO feet along the Westerly boundary of the said NES of the SWA of Section 1 to a point; thence North 70000108" East 132.73 feet to a point; thence South 89059152" East 419.00 feet along a line Northerly of and parallel to the said Southerly boundary of the NEA of the SWC of Section 1 to a point; thence South 75024150/1 East 390.22 feet to a point; thence North 89035'10" East 100.00 feet to a point; thence South 0024150" East 5.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the SFA of Section 1 to a point; thence North 89035110" East 150.00 feet to a point; thence South 0024150" East 320.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the SWA of Section 1 to a point; thence North 89035110" East 100.00 feet to a point; thence South 0024150" East 84.29 feet along a line 60.00 feet Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the SW)4 of Section 1 to a point on the said Southerly boundary of the NE's of the SVPA of Section 1; thence South 89059152" East 60.00 feet along the said Southerly boundary of the NES of the SIPA of Section 1 to the point of beginning, compri- sing 21.45 acres, more or less. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MER N,- 'ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Section 1: That the aforementioned real property which is described as follows:_ MEADOW VIEW NO. 2 ANNEXATION A parcel of land lying in the NEY of the SV/4 of Section 1, T. 3N.9 R. 1W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the said SWA of Section 1; thence North 002415010 West 10323.80 feet along the Easterly boundary of the said SW of Section 1 to a point marking the Southeast corner of the said NE14 of the SW of Section 1, also said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 0024150" West 664.65 feet along the said Easterly boundary of the SVA of Section 1 to a point; thence South 89039150" West 402.16 feet to a point; thence North 1041/1011 West 660.75 feet to a point on the Northerly boundary of the said NE)4 of the SVA of Section 1; thence South 89048120,1 West 910.81 feet along the said Northerly boundary of the NLI,4 of the SW4A. of Section 1 to a point marking the Northwest corner of the said NE'+ of the Step of Section 1; thence South 0011/2811 East 860.00 feet along the Westerly boundary of the said NES of the SWA of Section 1 to a point; thence North 700000081, East 132.73 feet to a point; thence South 89059/521/ East 419.00 feet along a line Northerly ofand parallel to the said Southerly boundary of the NL34 of the S of Section 1 to a point; thence South 75024150„ East 390.22 feet to a point; thence North 89035/1011 East 100.00 feet to a point- thence South 0024150" East 5.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the said iasterlyboundary of the SVI+ of Section 1 to a point, thence North B913511011 East 150.00 feet to a int; thence South 0024,50t0 East 320.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the SWA of Section 1 to aint; thence Nort9035/10" East 100.00 feet to a point; thence South 0024150" East 84.29 feet along a line 60.00 feet Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the SW)4 of Section 1 to a point on the said Southerly boundary of the NE}A of the StA of Section l; thence South 89*59052t1 East 60.00 feet along the said Southerlyboundary of the M of the S[� of Section 1 to the point of beginning, comprising 21.5 acres, more or less* be, and the same is hereby accepted, as required by the owners, and made a part of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. Section 2. That the aforementioned real property is hereby zoned "Atl Residential. Section 3. That the Clerk of the City of Meridian shall cause one (1) copy of the legal d Leri tion and map which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries as _altered, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission within 10 days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its `parke, approval and publication as required by law. �. Pa$sed-by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada Cotant -.Ida o this 9th day of July, 1973. 111111W FW,,4 !WWAM' NOW , t I I AMBROSE, FITZGERALD IN LONGETEIG ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS 929 EAST FIRST MERIDIAN. IDAHO 83642 TELEPHONE 888-446 • NOTICE OF ANNEXATION AND ZONING HEARING Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, that a hearing will be held at the City Hall in the City of Meridian, at the hour of 7:30 P.M., on Monday, July 2, 1973, for the purpose of annexing and zoning of the following described property. Any and all interested parties shall be heard at said hearing. The following described property to be known as 11Meadow View No. 2 Annexation" and to be zoned "A" Residential: A parcel of land lying in the NE -14 of the SW -14 of Section 1, T. 3N., R. 1W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the said SW -4 of Section 1; thence North 0024'5.0" West 1,323.80 feet along the Easterly boundary of the said SW -4 of Section 1 to a point marking the Southeast corner of the s -aid- NE4 of the SW4- of -Section 1, also - said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 0024'501° West 664.65 feet along the said Easterly boundary of the SW4 of Section 1 to a point; thence South 890391501/ West 402.16 feet to a point; thence North 1°41'10" West 660.75 feet to a point on the Northerly boundary of the said NE -4 of the SW -4 of Section 1; thence South 89°48'20" West 910.81 feet along the said Northerly boundary of the NE -14 of the SW -14 of Section 1 to a point marking the Northwest corner of the said NE -4 of the SW -14 of Section 1; thence South 0°11'2801 East 860.00 feet along the Westerly boundary of the said NE -14 of the SW -14 of Section 1 to a point; thence North 70°00'08" East 132.73 feet to a point; thence South 89°59'5201 East 419.00 feet along a line Northerly of and parallel to the said Southerly boundary of the NE -14 of the SW -4 of Section 1 to a point; thence South 75024'50" East 390.22 feet to a point; thence North 89°35'10" East 100.00 feet to a point; thence South 0°24'5010 East 5.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the SW -14 of Section 1 to a point; thence North 89035'1000 East 150.00 feet to a point; thence South 0°24'5011 East 320.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the SW -14 of Sec. 1 to a point; thence North 89°35'10'0 East 100.00 feet to a point; thence South 0024'50" East 84.29 feet along a line 60.00 feet Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the SW -14 of Section 1 to a point on the said Southerly boundary of the NE -14 of the SW -4 of Section 1; AMBROSE. FITZGERALD & LONGETEIG ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS 929 EAST FIRST MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 TELEPHONE 888-4461 thence South 89°59'52°' East 60.00 feet along the said Southerly boundary of the NE4 of the SW -14 of Section 1 to the point of beginning, comprising 21.45 acres, more or less. DATED This Z�z day of June, 1973. 0 211 BALD J. COX City Clerk t'.,j tl'`s+ 1-07 ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 22 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING NNEXI NG A ' ZOfl7KG CERTAIN T IN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS IroLtAWS : A''PORTION OF THE Nye S44MECTION 12, TWP. 3 NORTH, RANGE 3'WEST9 BOISE MERIDIAN,`ADA COUNTY, IDAEO; THE NWIA OF THE SWy4 OF SECTION 19 TWP. 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WESTI BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; THE NWA NWAs SECTION 129 TWP. 3 NORTH, RANGEWEST9 BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; A PORTION OF THE NEJA SW}A, TWP, 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST$ BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; A PORTION OF THE SWIA SEA AND W S$A OF SECTION it TWP. 3 NORTH] RANGE 1 WEST, B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND A PORTION OF THE Na4 NW)4 SECTION 189 TWP, 3 MRTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO,, WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, have concluded that it in in the best interest of said City to annex to said City certain real property which is described as follows: GREGORY SUBDIVISION UNIT NO. 3 ` A portion of. the Nye SE)4 NW149 Section 129 Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boi"oridian* AdaCount . � y, Idaho, more particularly .described by metes and bounds as followsa,, I Commencing at the center of Section 12, T: 3N., R. 1W.9 B.M., Ada County, Idaho, and running N, on055" E., 664.28 feet along the Easterly boundary of the 9 SW NW%, said Section 12, to the Northeast corner of the said Sys SE14 NW1.9 Section 129 said point being the Southeast corner of Gregory Subdivision Unit No. 1 as shown on the official plat thereof on file in the office of the Ada County Recorder in Book 20 of Plats at Mee 1300 and 1301; thence N. 0015045" E.9.662.18 feet along the Easterly boundary of ,the MA of said Section i2, also being the Easterly boundary of said Gregory Subdivision Unit `NO. '19 to the Northeast corner of the SE44 NW)49 said Section 12 also being the Northeast corner of said Gregory Subdivision.Unit No. l; thence N. 19-.514.5" W.,' 291.35 ,feet along the Northerly boundary-of the said SE14 NWA, Section 12, also being the r.';, Northerly boundary of said Gregory Subdivision Unit No. 19 to the Northwest corner of 'said Gregory Subdivision Unit No. 1, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; tbteaw continui N. 89°51115" W. 1034.91 feet alo n8 , ng said Northerly boundary SE14 Section 32 to the Northwest corner thereof; thence S. On5145" W. '346.18 feet along th4:Westerly boundary of the said SE34 NW14, Section ,12 to the Northwesterly'corner, of Gregory Subdivision Unit No. 2 as shown on the official plat thereof,on file in the, office of the Ada County Recorder in ,Book 21 of Plats at pages 1396 and 1397;;thence along tho'boundary of said Gregory Subdivision Unit N6. 2 the following course and yal�, distances: , 170.62 feet ,to 'a"Point; „ thence S. 0-0814501,W.,' 61.00 feet to a point; thence S, 89*51115" E., 600.00feet ,to a point;' + thence N,.. 0°084511 E 155.00 feetto a point;; thence S. 89°51915"E., 67;59 feet to a point of curve;- ''thence Northeasterly 25.16 feet along a curve to the left having a radius of 20.00 feet, „a tangent of 14.55 feet, a deflection angle of 72005100" left and whose long chdrd bears .& 54o06t15" E., 23.53 feet to a point of reverse curve; thence Northeasterly 25.22 r;iul feet along a curve to the right having a radius of 45.00 feet, a tangent of 12.95 feet, a deflection angle of 32006130" right and whose long chord bears N. 34007100" E., 24„89 feot to a point on curve; thence N. 39°49145' W., 101.39 feet to a point; thence it N. 7600645" E., 123.69 feet to a point; thence S. 89051915" E., 110-00 feet to the Northeasterly corner of said Gregory Subdivision Unit No. 2; thence No on8+45" E.�' 110.00 feet along the Westerly boundary of said Gregory Subdivision Unit No. 1 to the , point, sof beginning. ! MEADOW VIEW SUBDIVISION Thee NW)4 of the SW;4 of Section Is Township 3 North, Range 1. West, Boise Meridian, Ada. County,, Idaho. NORTH GATE'4MIDIVISIONi, RESIDENTIAL ' A portion of the NVA NW Section 12, Township'3'North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridianf. i l 'i(s +" 'Ada County, Idaho, more parti.oul.arly described by metes �, and' bounde aa' f ows: `,+ Commencing at the Northwest corner of Section 12, T. 3N, R. 1W., B.M., Ada County* :14016+; thence, Southerly 265 feet~ more or leas, 'along the Westerly boundary, of the �+ P1 WA saidSection 12 to a point, which is the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; "A'; thence continuing Southerly 1059.5 feet, more or less, along the Westerly boundary of,'.' "N the NWS►., NWK said Section 12 tee:,, the Southwest corner of the NWA NW)4 said Section 12; r thaIIce Easterly 1327.5 feet, more or less,, along the Southerly boundary of, the NW)4 NWj4 it Section !12 to the 'Southeast c6fter' of the'NWy4�Nth said'Section 12; ,thence Northerly �, r, 232505 feet; more or less, along the Easterly boundary of the NWIA NW)4 said Section 12--'t �. they Northeast corner of the NifiA NWS said Rection 12i thence Westerly 876.3 feett atp + e mr los s j along the Northerly boundary of the NWA NWA said Smction 12 to'a pii;t t. encu EI s 7 F r, ►putherly 265 feet, more or less;, along a 'line parallel to and approxjmately 450 feet i o y ti T H tle ^{ 1 Yf ORDINANCE 90._ 225 Easterly from the Westerly boundary of the NWJ4 NW)4 said Section 12 to a point; thence Westerly 450 feet, more or lesa, along a line parallel to and approximately'' 265 feet Southerlyfrom the Northerly boundary r9 of the NWS► MPA said Section 12 to the real paint of beginning, comprising 37.3 acres, more or loses. , AND, Commencing at the Northwest corner of .Section 12, T. 3N.,. R. 1W.,'B.M. Ada County, Idaho; thence Easterly 450 feet, more or less, along the Northerly bound"Y � of the NWA NWA said Sec. 12 to a .point which is the' REAL POINT OF BEGINNINQ q thence► Southerly 505 feet, more or Zees, along line parallel to and approximately 450,' ' feet Easterly from the Westerly boundary of the NWl4 NW said Section 12 to a` pojnt;r+',C'p;, thence Easterly 398 feeto more or less, along a line parallel to and approximately =, 505 feet Southerly from the Northerly boundary of the NW* NWK said Seo, .12 ;to a,'' 'C" � 'r point; thence Southerly 8200 feet, more or less, along a line parallel to and approx-N; imately 479 feet Westerly from the Easterly boundary of the Nib£ NVA said Soctioxa?°l �' a� it' q to a point on the Southerly boundary of the NWy4 MFA said Section 12; thence Easterly, ;, I1, �' 4?9 feet, more or less along the Southerly'boundary of`the NWA NW}4 said Section 12 ` to the Southeast corner of the NWy4 NWy4 said Section 12; thence Northerly 132505 feet, more or less, along the Easterly boundary- of the NWK NWA said Section 12 - ,the Northeast corner of the NW NWS said' Section 12; thence Westerly* 876,31e►et ''' oless, along the Northerly boundary of the NWNW +ee .d ... °r���;r� reeul point of bog tng, comprising 19.2 acres more or less. 'NORTH GATE SUBDIVISION. COMMERCIAL' r Aportion of the NWy4NW, Section 12, Township 3 North,'Range 1 Westq,•.Boise�Mer.tl Ada County, 'Idaho, more particularly described by metes and bounds as f,llowie:,li 1 '';,, gyp; Ii IC 'r rE Commencing at the Northwest corner' of Section 12, T,' 3N., R. 1W., t.k.,, Ade VQIdnty, Idaho, said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Southerly 265 ,geet� Sao' or less, along the Westerly: boundary of .the NVA NW* paid Section 12 to a' pojat; �° � K,ta 11 thence Easterly 450 feet, more or less, along a line' parallel to and spproximatoly 265 ;feet Southerly from the Northerly boundary of the NWK 'NDS said Seation;'l point; thence Northerly 26$ feet, more or less, along a line parallel''to approximately 450 feet Easterly from the Westerly ,boundary' of the X4,11 ",ilk J F 4IR1� �Ii Section 12 to a point on the Northerly boundary of the NVQ PAW said Section 2 `then a Westerly 450 feet' more or`less 'alo the Northerly boundary C 4 y � , ng, y � dory of the r�'� '� ��„�`�1 M1 said: Section 12 to the real point of beginning, comprising ,2.? acres, mare,�.eet« IWTEBOOM CORRIDOR ANNEXATION A ,corridor of land which-is the Northerly sixtyfeet. of the ' NQ4 of� thes `owxt►ship 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise I�eridiai�, and nrh#.ch r Westerly from' th+� Northweent coiner of that parcel of land ]mown' as the City .of Merida ,sewer T�'eewt�ten',�;,,,'"'r� " '' '” NW a SW of J:Plant to the NE corner of the of th f� y �q,3N1,' R, �iW., H.11♦ '4 il r�!'I; l i Y1,,�'� ' ^��r ��_, pllY'ft l�{�i ',MERIDIAN MANOR SUBDIVISION 'A ,portion of� the SWA of the'S1* and; all of''the'NA of the: S Z( of Bekatio�ar;1,' R.' 1W., ,,B.M., , Ada County, 'ldaho, being more particularly described as 'fol1owe3s p f i f11 #d pJ ''Beginning at : a point marking . the Southwest corner of saAd SE34 ' of Section I rt f "ql' 4 y q thence North 00051001+ West 21�J.00 feet more or less, along the •Westex'y bauidaryl. ,r dy d C of said � SE* of Section' 1, which is also the Easterly boundary of the Catholi.o Rector s Annexations Ordinance No, , 184," to the REAL POINT OY BMGINNING ; thence continuing North O 05.00 West, 29437.98 feet, more or less, Sslorng staid Westerly boundary of the SZ4 of Section 1 to a point marking the, Nor0west' cornar . of said SE34; thence South 89051135"Eat 2 654.43 feemore or less a];o he • sfeet, • rf ou {+F Northerly boundary of said M . of Section 1 toa point ' marking the Northeast cox�� f'said SE)4 of Section 1; thence South 000, 1401tr Eaest l"1,3 4.03 feet more * 1e alongthe Easterly boundary p©,', y dasy � of said Nye of the � SF,y4 of Bentson 1 to a 1� the Southeast corner of said NYa of the SE)6 of Section .1.; thence 89048,5� West,, 2,185.55 feet, more or. ,ens,,`Alouf the Southerly boundary of said'Nyfi off', t e , �'ne';;� of 'Section 1, a portion of which is also the Northerly boundary of Parcel No , , C Church of God Seventh Da Annexation Ordinance No. 190' ansa, the Northerl bounder t ��' "r"'„sC ! f the Embassy Park Annexation, Ordinance Noe 189 to a point marking , I t 1 S,tlidi Vii, corner of said Embassy Park Annexation; .thence along the Westerly boundary or, said Zmbassy Park Annexation the following courses,and diestanceai ,, 4 South 24°43*20” East 44,5.02feet more or loses, to a 1 , point; thence South 30 0O UOC n h,, st, 195481 _feet, more or less, to a "point l on- the � Northerly boundary of, tho., est qyt, Cherry Lane. Annexation,.',Ordinance, No. 184; thence ].saving said Westerly boundary C 1 , ''� the 'Embassy Park Annexation algng the boundary -of' said West Cherry IMA ;,Anne t:4o tl;, the following courses and distances: ? In der ". South 8$°33100" West 93.58 feet, more or less, to a point; thence. $outh,;1°a"'?�,4Q'� ;"°;( 11d'�h'`, East 529.78 feet more or los to a' point;'theaneeleavingsaid, bounder. �' ` `'' West,Cherr Lane Annexation North 89051#001, Went 407'.90 feet moreC1.�,l�"a���� y Y of", o; IYy �I p a line Northerly of and parallel to the Southerly. boundary of said SWyG of thla SF,, sof Section 1, to a point; ' alt .,'G'�, ;r�,'�'°�i"l�ti4i>,'n.. ,. �.`�,� W. J.,p r,.,• t'i,,. ».ey, �- -+�.)n i.r+u.wm�M n 1 ^t;f+ h.,h.,`«»hra w.�.....p.,.......�+"H"ly}"',,�'�"�'ar, •ytl �Jpll w. d.li+.ti+4..�4�'M�bn�, �f'n4$%Nfe"e�l�}iL+y�b�It�.�LidLl�dl .I t F!+11 4-4 -14, .. . . . . . . . .zli Ail it t 0RDIWC:9 NO. 225`.,��" f, NINI ,� 14 N 6%th, Z46434201"Bast 445.04 �I, more ,a �poinon,l z op0l t �a.bo'Noptherdary at ih� i0j, l93.8Vfootq more or ,f,,,;Cborry ImwAnnexatioUl, Ordiwa i, Nil 184; Aiesteilyb* � West Cherry lAng�Anp owl '66il a and 4 so, ozation, the toll ptb88!31t ..more.or, east" to,a paintsthence leaving; add, � bound feet, � more ar�,leso,_to� a pointj thence, 3014th 1027, y of the A;;ticfa North 890 51 t,OD"West 07,99� r j! -more oil, -leas �'al 'Sw, at",rallel, to the of $6016 morborL; esow, ai 0 &a, or 10 li 46*0 �South.�OOWWI ]cast �uiiio, Not I 16AS a, Un b �J, ir of the, M to 9, point on the; Northerly to �.saiili Westerly, boun4a berry L=0 omt Got 661 - - *14, West C jft�ftbqnco North, "ar5lo"0011 West i6&r o long: sold Vortherly boundary', laf;tbo' West, ChOrryl� Lane Aunexat16ij And pamllel to said aouth,64� w ilipt orly of 4; ��,ti nt of*be no acmprisiz4 il:?C�7 acrois morill or lo"41 Poi j i e '4 i t� I fit Id 1,, j 4 4 3 w6roill,., Ranp'; ii .:Me r# PAZ ?,Vortion of,,1.he,,.M N* zast4; Bolt A ,bad b and bduada4m., 'Coliunty".1000 more particularly., doseri y, motes 11 C o*oncins ah' the North"it cir Soctjoi'180, T, 3NA"t"A "*ji and rig Ni 8902Ot 24111I Z."` 1092 �d fee' h'' 'therly"bo­ t a said Section l8j'.ta thi,Ni6rthwest'corner 'o�, 'Sea rip feet along oundoxy 4f,tha I' 'W,IiA403ft'p0 So 0,04010" W.9,282.', thO Weliterly"i b A) I I l8fill, to the 'TRUJ�, POINT 01P BEGINNIXG V'tlaonoe - pontinui 1Q, iot �%mIaug -said Westeily': bdu'A'dAx,�Y,,.of the 100% �O;CU04 18_,tll* "the along, thi�'Zouthoiij,', bell 04 1 w­i.t�t �Y6�l4iat;,Jhencio N., 891126020")C., 622.C*:1** grin, j 0 elation. IS to , it poUt; it so JIM -t once xI 103's" 00 leeVj to d' 'bm h M�` axed 0240 fide Ustot, ylrovi, thOrsat -*ptqrly�' '1 10.4 :P61.9 ;­tbol a, 89*20; al6ug'A", 140 '1 t O�'V.,'622 0161 "t !" ' feet,. NollIT' 1�o% bounoary, 0 tul ,e�atib ti t oft kldu *A, iz, , the .mime bere�y, imccep, i''Ilias Countys 144116 `I JIJ f �j q, 4VA Aeridioi )'II I if fifl ii Lt aqd're`i6a,''""prt ► a berob,I j� rel �i A, ew'Subdviii on R1 dO,3 64L""� t W'' , *'' .(;at On �;*OI IIVU aim . , . I I I " "; I I �11'%?t�4 04 I'll il , "4 1, 1, 1 - I �► 1� i - . R JI" �, r I Zone Comm Dral.$41 VoI Golibdi�4si6i, '40mmoral4i d 14" Not A� 11 1 p r 'obbom Zcfikd*�r:Anuo�* °}+"i a7 xip�ti ta"', Cit pbxeC, "A: ResidontlI oni tr Viol ;A," JIA U� bo Il,pr Z of jr r logo, , 1� .alY 1 w 0 pi 'WTI be t4t* To'! iv. boo. �10, P4 WOW' I-"f#iicApti0:A 4ad map, ii*Kch shaIllai 'jtiit,%ail ?#* filed:vi. ounty, (IA 3� _t 1111"L wo,�?� is Al.""i'41 hq, cam piopl, 4tbip oll6v i"ZO 10 do�%­, f 44 o 114 lv ,fel4 let on appro du& publioa too, 40.ii ­� F, I! pl. j, Ii., of"t 31, ,4i I 'the dit d " "' f-#1 _.. 1, 1*0 thjL of TZA day 7 l, 1�,�II, i "i ; " 1, MR 1'flol� V'W"a. ILI ANNEXATION RE UEST I respectfully request the City of Meridian to annex that certain parcel of land into its corporate limits that is generally described as follows; The NWk of the SWk of Section 1, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, B.M., Ada County, Idaho. of Owen M. Frost J"U-8 EN 1NEERS,..N'. 5903 Franklln Road •' Boise, fdaho 83705- Projekt: -1627 Date:-° February.24, 1973 DESCRIPTION FOR. MDOW VIEW S.UBDIVIST01111 11 � A PORTION ,OF THE M?1/4 SkTIA, SECTI01N 1, 3N. , RR. W.* B.M. , TDAHO Peq n€ lnr at tf,e brnm� can marking the Soot?aciest corner of the S=Tl / of Section 3, -T.3N. , R. 1W. , ?;.�s. , Ada County Idaho,. thence. North 0°23'10 'Rest 1,600.53 feet alon the Vest;erly boundary O:e the said %M /4 of Sectio. 1, - whichis '. also the center line of Li r.'ler_ Road,_to an iron yin` thence 'North 1'39030'25`' East 40.00 feet sIonf* e .line Norti erI7 OF and nnralle1 to the Soothed" b ua*d ar- ofof thA snits /4 of S+ct 1 oar:l to "=a hr. Zsc c z++ , alrse� staid,oi�;t l� �,in-. tT, , PEAT., v11 p?*r .1 x O RG I thence along toe following courses and distances tr iron tnius: continuing North 39°30'25x�.East 50G.0+1 Feet elo>uS a line 'Northerly of and-arnll.el . td J boundary of tr e MV1 of tlan S".7114 1' of Section Iq thence South 47*50145" East 1404.10 Feet toa t on 0 e said Southerly boundary of the IT41/4 of the Si11/4 of Section t thence North 89 305'u�nt 37?.�0 !'Ret alora� t'?e sd!d Southerly ' agtlilda iV fY^ (".;1„°'. Z�d�./te v� �I-.e M,71 , 4 Li :'ecv. ap I tv, a �J6 iut: z:�L7.? sa,� tIL( .Sut4:�Ieast coa tt it Lir _..^.0 I aid i"j?7.r C} fiC SY'Y /1.. troy (C'i ? C?a1 1. u 11+ aal:E' k tigtl: {t°lam ' `%!st, 1.,319.61- feet 'alonly i:_'Le E 8Le%-r - 1'S':7=iia iitr of the, 8 ifj, 'Z4VT /I;, r f. Mi � a t.j7 l.p• �{ r': r �y�,. 7 « 7. / 1. 1i /' ��. 2 tP TQ_ 'dortheapt . corner n� tanj n .. r7 -!V4 of *Tan S!,Y. /'9 of Section I. rt. n-�74 1 thence South '39°4�?'20", Weat 1,327.65 feet alone the Northerly bound, of ti1P said X11/fir of S��tie� i +:�a a arasr car mar�.lna; tiro _dcartn*.asst- korner of the said SpM� /': o£ Scactio-a I; thence So th °`?S' In"Eaat ls�t52.r�9 feet sloras* t'ac Aair1 tT:est er!7 boundary of. the SWI/4 ,€►f Section I to*an iron pin-,' thence North 39"30'25" East 40.00 feet along parallel to the said Southerly boundary of the cA" rT,a 16 log tioz 1 to the noint of beginning, comprising 35.23 acres, more or. Ic3s. i .7C/CW:dc AMBROSE, FITZGERALD At LONGETV0 ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS 929 EAST FIRST MERIDIAN. IDAHO 83642 LEPHONE 888.4461 NOTICE OF ANNEXATION AND ZONING HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY given, pursuant to the Ordinances of ,the City of Meridian, that a hearing will be held at the City Hall in the City of Meridian, at the hour of 8:00 P.M., on Monday, August 7, 1972, for the purpose of annexation and zoning of the following described property. All interested parties shall be heard at said hearing. The following described property to be known as "Gregory Subdivision Unit #3" to be zoned "A7 Residential: (Attached hereto and marked Exhibit 'Wr) The following described property to be known as NAN Corporation Property to be zoned 'W' Residential: NWk of SWk of Section 1, T. 3 N., R. 1 W., B.M. The following described property to be known-a-9— the North Gate Development to be zoned "A" Residential: (Attached hereto and marked Exhibit "B") The following described property to be known as the Noteboom Corridor to be zoned "A" Residential: (Attached hereto and marked Exhibit 1ICTF) The following described property to be known as North Gate Development to be zoned "C" Commercial: (Attached hereto and marked Exhibit 11D11) DATED This qday of July, 1972. HERALD J. COX City Clerk J-U—B ENGINEERS, INC6903 Franklin Road • Boise, Idaho 83705 ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION OWEN FROST PROPERTY. MERIDIAN, IDAHO The Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 1, T. 3 N., R. 1. W., B. M.,.Ada County, Idaho. APPENDIX 1 (Added to Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions For Meadow View No. 2 Subdivision by Amendment dated February , 1981) 1. Dwelling Units having a minimum floor area of 1,000 square feet or more shall be permitted only on the following Lots: Lots 2, 4, 6, and 8, Block 14 Lots 3,-5, 7, 91 24, and 29, Block 12 2. Dwelling Units having a minimum floor area of 1,100 square feet or more shall be permitted only on the following Lots: Lots 3, 51 7, 91 10, and 12, Block 14 Lots 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 19, 21, 23, 25, 28, 30, 32, and 34, Block 12 3. Dwelling Units having a minimum floor area of 1,200 square feet or more shall be permitted only on the following Lots: Lots 1, 11, 13, and 15, Block 14 Lots 1, 11, 12, 15, 18, 20, 22, 26, 27, 31, 33, 35, 40, and 42, Block 12 Lots 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, and 14, Block 11 Lots 14 and 15, Block 10 Lots 9, 11, and 13, Block 7 Lots.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, Block 13 4. Dwelling Units having a minimum floor area of 1,300 square feet or more shall be permitted only on the following.Lots: Lots 14 and 16, Block 14 Lots 13, 14, 16, 17, 36, 37, 38, 39, and 41, Block 12 Lots 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 110 13, 15, and 16, Block 11 Lots. 16, 17, and 18, Block 10 Lots 8, 10, 12, and 14, Block 7 Lot 18, Block 6 Lot 1, Block 13 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 2, 1988 PAGE # 3 Walker: The person I have interested in it can only afford this 834 square foot home, he is an older person and that is all he needs, a single man. Mayor Kingsford: Any other questions or comments of the Council? Brewer: I do not think I would be opposed to this, we certainly do not want it to be --a trend setter, since it is the last lot in there and it would get rid of a weed patch and suit the buyers needs to. Mayor Kingsford: I think we might have a problem on how we do it, Counselor you might make reference to that. City Attorney: I`see two problems, one we need an appropriate Variance Request and then I think we have the covenant and restr- iction problem. I do not know how the covenants read there but if they do have a restriction from covenants you will have to handle that also. Mayor Kingsford: We do have to follow the proper procedure under our Ordinances. I think maybe you got a feel of the Council's reaction to this request. Myers: I have a small problem with going this small,, even though .. it is 66 feet less than the nine hundred, but if.everything got put together I would not have a problem other than that. Item #4: Approve the Bills: The Motion was made by Myers and seconded:by Brewer to approve payment of the bills: Motion Carried: --All Yea: - Item #5: Request for Zone Change by Dobaran,-Property in Ada County. . Mayor Kingsford: We have a request from Ad& County for our comments regarding -.a -.Zone -Change -for the _Dobaran- Property out on Eagle Road, I have asked the City Clerk to prepare a letter in anticipation that the Council -would agree with me that I will read to you and see what your thoughts are. The above request has:been reviewed by the.City of Meridian and due to the fact this parcel is in our Impact Area and contiguous with the present;City.Limit$:.it.should be annexed to the City of Meridian rather than rezoned under the County. It is also our opinion if development is!-.to.:occur+,on this parcel it should be served with City water.;and::sewer..This:--.property _is, just South of Upland _ Industries ;property .on the East --side Eagle Road and just North of property that: -is being',considered on a Conditional Annexation. If it is to be used as an Industrial Parcel, I feel it --should be in the City Limits. If you agree we have this letter drafted with an area for signature for each of you. _ Councilman Giesler: We have talked about going ahead on this Conditional Annexation and I think this is a real good idea to request this parcel be annexed to the City. :f t 5 O is u �Z'5010 R 3 *PPLICATiOIJ FOR SURDTI/I.SI vN API'AT, . Meridian Plana" & Zoning CoramistliOn p Applie&ti.ona must be presented at City Hell by tths Second IlorAzitly Cr the Month for Plaming Aug. 8, 1978 T. GENFRAL INFORMATI(R' BDIVISION NO. 2 MEADOW VIEW SU Proposed Name of Subdivi®io" B.M. Ada County, Idaho �o NF 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 1, T. 3 N • , R.1 W. , A pOi"LlulL TGener;i- Location ATTACHED. L al Description Attach if Lengthy Meridian Associates and N.A.N. Inc., General Partners Qu?aer s or Reeord Name Tani-vcvi lle, Wash. 98270 e .dddr@ 80 H.R.H. Development, Applicant (Name —:- U-nA Rnise. Idaho 83704 82iU 1NOr Lll u+moi — ras 183 REES ENGINEERSFame (E;�gineer, SurvOyor or Planner R-ic,- Tdaho 83705 ylUS Aquaj'-Lu� T -g2 rens City of Meridian Turi d tlon 8 egquiring �•pP�°oval ResidentialIndustri -(-Type of Subdivislan--Residential, Corr�n@reial� ( Date by (206) 659-730() (T`alaphone 1100 (208) 377-1611 maleph� on@ No. 208) 362-4981 04 ephon® ido 0 ,` • MEADOW 9JIEW N0,- 2 III. Continued 12, Are Easements for 5,6,7,8,9, YES W/5' along all streets 10, 119 Provided and where located? •9,eAr. as" ot. 13e Aro Fire Hydrants Provided, as shown on plat where located? 14* Are Street Lights Provided, NO where located? 15e Area to be dedicated to public or semi-public areas (a) School Sites) none (b) Public park site(s) none (e) Common area for residents none (d) Water supply, pumphouse none (e) Sewage disposal area none (f) Other none 16. Location of existing dedicated streets and their widths at the point immodiatoly adjacent to proposed development. 17e Vicinity Map (scale 1" - 3001) -- 2 copies 18. Contour map of area. SHOWN ON PLAT 9e Existing Buildings. to remain or be removed? NONE 20. 1" - 100' drawings showing genoral plan, and adjacent ©ubdivision--2 copieoe 2le Proposed protective covenants. ATTACHED . 22e Examination by city Engineer. MEADOW VIEW NO. 2 NO RESTRICTIONS AND DES* INFORMATION 0 Proposed (applicant) Is Allowed Land Uses " A " Residence 2e Minimum Lot Area 7000 sq. ft. 3e Minimum Lot Frontage 60 (31 1, Lot 11) 4e Minimum Lot Width QFront Setback 65 feet 5e Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 6e Front Setback 25 feet 7. Side Setback 5 feet per story. 8. Side Street Setback 20 feet 9. Rear Setback 20 feet 10. Percentage of Lot Coverage 35% VX* SPECIAL DISTRICTS (Staff) leSchool District R 2e Fire District (or Dept.) 3. Sewer District (or City) 4e Irrigation District 5e Water Company or District 6. Other (Name, Purpose) Ll* RECORD OF APPROVAL (Staff) 1. Technical Review Committee 2. County Planning Commission 3. City Plan. Comm* (Name) 4e County Surveyor (Final Only) 5e County Highway District (Final Only) 6, City Council Namo 7e Board of Ada County Commissioners (Final Only) Name Preliminary (date) Ordinance conformance (Staff) Approval Final (date) Y5 f iw. 3 t IAC` 4, 1 5,1('hay" 11A ij {,h�, Name Preliminary (date) Ordinance conformance (Staff) Approval Final (date) LEGAL 1.11iSCF2 I I' 1 I ()i I for T lEADOW VIEW S11111). No. A 1inrcol of kind lv int, in chc Nnrthenst gnar}('r of the Southxest quarter of `;(`Ct ion l , low11Shll) . ":')i Ih, P rope 1 Rest, llol ;e 'leridian, Aon Cminty, State of T(Inho, and more 1)s11-ticcclrcrly described as follows: Beginning at the ^cuthaaet corner of the said Southwest quarter of Section 1• thence North 0°24'50A W,2*st 1,323.80 feet along the Easterly boundary of the said Southwest quarter of Section 1 to a point marking the Southeast corner of the said North?ast quarter of the Southwest quarter of S�.-cticn 1, also said point being the REAL POINT OF nE©11dNINa• thence continuing North 0°24'50' west 6611.65 feet along; the said Easterly bounda17 of the Southv'V;t c;uarter of Section 1 to .a point; thence South 89039'50" West 402.16 feet to n point; tlaence North 1°41'].0" Weet 660.75 feet to a point on tho. Northerly boundery of the said Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section l; thence South 89048120" Wilt 910.81 feet the said Northerly boundary of the Northenst quarter of the c."thwest quarter of Section 1, to n point r:nrking thea 11orthwost corner of the said Northeast quarter of the �outhw,3st quarter of ;;action 1; thence South 0"11128" Enst ;360.00 feet alone; ttio Westerly boundary of the said Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1, to a point; thanco Horth4059152" °00' 08" Ens t 132.73 feet to n point, thence South East 4l.9.0o feet along a line Northerly of and pnkal.lel to the said Southorly boundary of the Northeast quarter of the South- westquarter of Section 1, to a point; thence South 75024150" East 390.22 feet to a point; then^Q North 89°35'10" Enrst 100.00 feet to a Point; thence South 0'24 5o East 5.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the Southwest quarter of Section l to a point, thence North 89°35110" East 150.00 feet to a point; thence South 0°24'50" East 320.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the na.id Easterly boundary of the Southwest quarter of Section 1 to a point; thence North 890 5'10" Erase 100-00 feet to a poIntj n South 0°2'50" Erst 1314,29 feet along aline 6ot�0ofeet Westerlyof land parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the Southwes quarter of S©ction 1 to a point on the said Southerly boundary of .the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1; thence South 89059'52" Eao t 60.00 feet along tale said Southerly boundary of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT Ditch and Road rights-of-way. 3¢ $i�'#a.'2i'li N 5U4 i l '..i g. "f" 4 "i .Rc• W.}F.y,+f '' `_ n"Y#its *pry" a a!'Sk'�> Xtk a`e 7 t5 7 h f- <`Y y ,'z a a�, °s"' �s'*#.`, `es'-"Czw s a 1P #a5ytitY ut3Sd _ r*mITT- �ti zea P. tri a t'"�`:.¢44 hn { r i {w ✓ s d a- . t y z. 44#6�1t""SE.#z#e�,'{ ` d: <s f a,Y ` 4 a az tr',.a,r4 '$z€t+�s'4's" ak _t 4 # a LEGAL 1.11iSCF2 I I' 1 I ()i I for T lEADOW VIEW S11111). No. A 1inrcol of kind lv int, in chc Nnrthenst gnar}('r of the Southxest quarter of `;(`Ct ion l , low11Shll) . ":')i Ih, P rope 1 Rest, llol ;e 'leridian, Aon Cminty, State of T(Inho, and more 1)s11-ticcclrcrly described as follows: Beginning at the ^cuthaaet corner of the said Southwest quarter of Section 1• thence North 0°24'50A W,2*st 1,323.80 feet along the Easterly boundary of the said Southwest quarter of Section 1 to a point marking the Southeast corner of the said North?ast quarter of the Southwest quarter of S�.-cticn 1, also said point being the REAL POINT OF nE©11dNINa• thence continuing North 0°24'50' west 6611.65 feet along; the said Easterly bounda17 of the Southv'V;t c;uarter of Section 1 to .a point; thence South 89039'50" West 402.16 feet to n point; tlaence North 1°41'].0" Weet 660.75 feet to a point on tho. Northerly boundery of the said Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section l; thence South 89048120" Wilt 910.81 feet the said Northerly boundary of the Northenst quarter of the c."thwest quarter of Section 1, to n point r:nrking thea 11orthwost corner of the said Northeast quarter of the �outhw,3st quarter of ;;action 1; thence South 0"11128" Enst ;360.00 feet alone; ttio Westerly boundary of the said Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1, to a point; thanco Horth4059152" °00' 08" Ens t 132.73 feet to n point, thence South East 4l.9.0o feet along a line Northerly of and pnkal.lel to the said Southorly boundary of the Northeast quarter of the South- westquarter of Section 1, to a point; thence South 75024150" East 390.22 feet to a point; then^Q North 89°35'10" Enrst 100.00 feet to a Point; thence South 0'24 5o East 5.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the Southwest quarter of Section l to a point, thence North 89°35110" East 150.00 feet to a point; thence South 0°24'50" East 320.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the na.id Easterly boundary of the Southwest quarter of Section 1 to a point; thence North 890 5'10" Erase 100-00 feet to a poIntj n South 0°2'50" Erst 1314,29 feet along aline 6ot�0ofeet Westerlyof land parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the Southwes quarter of S©ction 1 to a point on the said Southerly boundary of .the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1; thence South 89059'52" Eao t 60.00 feet along tale said Southerly boundary of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 1, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT Ditch and Road rights-of-way. 3¢ $i�'#a.'2i'li N 5U4 i l '..i g. "f" 4 "i .Rc• W.}F.y,+f '' `_ n"Y#its *pry" a a!'Sk'�> Xtk a`e 7 t5 7 h f- <`Y y ,'z a a�, °s"' �s'*#.`, `es'-"Czw s a 1P #a5ytitY ut3Sd _ r*mITT- �ti zea P. tri a t'"�`:.¢44 hn { r i {w ✓ s d a- . t y z. 44#6�1t""SE.#z#e�,'{ ` d: <s f a,Y ` 4 a az tr',.a,r4 '$z€t+�s'4's" ak _t 4 # are recorded, it being the intention and purpose of the covenant to assure that all dwellings shall be of a quality of workmanship and materials substantially the same or better than that which can be produced on the date these covenants are recorded at the minimum cost stated herein for the minirum. permitted dwelling size. The ground floor area of the main structure, exclusive of one-story open porches and garages, shall be not less than 900 square feet for a one- story dwelling, nor less than 700 square feet for a dwelling of more than one story of a two story building. No building shall be erected, placed, or altered on any lot until the construction plans and specifications and a plan showing the location of the structure have been approved by the Architectural Control Cot?nri.ttee as to quality of worlananship and materials, harmony of external design with: existing structures, and as to location with respect to topography and finish grade elevation. No fence or wall shall be erected, placed or altered on any lot nearer to any street than the minimum building setback line unless si.rilarly approved. Approval shall be as provided in Paragraphs 4 & 5. The Architectural Control Corrnttee is composed of: Name Address Horace M. Smith 1570 Loggers Creek Lane Boise, Idaho Harvey Geis 3490 Covered Wagon Boise, Idaho Roger H. Jones 3000 McKinney Boise, Idaho A majority of the conmi.ttee may designate a representative to act for it. In the event of death or resignation of any member of the cmri.ttee, the remaining members shall shall have full authority to designate a successor. Neither the members of the committee, nor its desiQn.ated representative shall be entitled to any compensation for services performed pursuant to this covenant. At any time, the record owners of a majority of the lots shall have the power through a duly recorded written instrument to change the membership of the committee or to withdraw from the committee or to restore to it any of its powers and duties. 4. The Committee's approval or disapproval as required in these covenants shall be in writing. In the event the conani_ttee, or its designated representative, fails to approve or disapprove within 30 days after plans and specifications have been submitted to it, or in any event, if no suit to enjoin the construction has been comnenced prior to the completion thereof, approval will not be required and the related covenants shall be deemed to have been fully complied with. 5. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under thein, unless an instrument signed by a majority of the owners of the lots has been recorded, agreeing to change said covenants in whole or in part, for a period of thirty (30) years � t � � �� fie;• tat;{ #47•'4 `$ �'.F m� { "�. '`�c3''k itlh 4;4 ��*.n� low 0 E 13. No individual water supply system shall be permitted on any lot. 14. No oil drilling, oil development operations, oil refining, quarrying or mining operations of any kind shall be permitted upon or in any lot, nor shall oil tanks, wells, tunnels, mineral excavations or shafts be permitted upon or in any lot. No derrick or other structures designed for use in boring for oil or natural gas shall be erected, maintained or permitted upon any lot. 15. No individual sewage disposal system shall be permitted on any lot. 16. No fence, wall, hedge, or mass planting, other than foundation planting, shall be permitted to extend nearer to any street than the minimum. setback line, except that nothing shall prevent the erection of a necessary retaining wall, the top of which does not extend more than two feet above the finished grade at the back of said retaining wall, provided however, that no fence, wall, hedge, or mass planting shall at any time, where permitted, extend higher than five feet above ground. 17. Lot area and width. % dwelling shall be erected or placed on any lot having a width of less than 60 feet at the minimum building setback line nor shall any dwelling be erected or placed on any lot having an area of less than 6000 square feet. 18. Enforcement shall be by proceedings at l.aw or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant either to restrain violation or to recover damage. 19. Invalidation of any one of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. 20. Keeping or raising of farm animals or poultry shall be prohibited. All dogs and cats or household pets kept on these premises shall.be properly fed and cared for and shall be adequately fenced so as not to annoy or trespass upon the use of the property of others. Dogs shall not be allowed to run at large. Not more than two dogs and or cats or other pets may be kept at one time, except that a litter of young may be kept until Eight (8) weeks old. 21. Parking of boats, trailers, motorcycles, trucks, truck-canmers and like equipment, or junk cars or other unsightly vehicles, shall not be allowed on any part of said property nor on public ways adjacent thereto excepting only within the confines of an enclosed garage, or behind fences taller than said objects, and no portion of same may project beyond the enclosed area. Parking of automobiles or other vehicles on any part of the property shall be prohibited except within garages, carports, driveways or other approved areas. The Architectural Committee shall be the sole and exclusive judges of approved parking areas. Their decision is final and binding. IN TJKMASS 'MMEOF, The undersized have affi;zed their signatures. N� �_ VIRGIL T. KING ASSESSOR MEMBER OF INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS ADA COUNTY COURT HOUSE 525 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 345-9804 City of Meridian City Eng. Dear Sir. PH ff M ASES0R BOISE, IDAHO • J.L. (MIKE) CLARK CHIEF DEPUTY STUART T. GOWANS MOTOR VEHICLE DEPT. 1405 N. ORCHARD AVE. 83704 PHONE 375-8550 Dec. 2. 1974 In regard to the plat of Meadow View Sub. The plat was in error in that it had been recorded with the incorrect owner. An amd. plat has been recored , which is correct , this plat is recorded in book SON 35, pages 3008 and 3009 of the recorders office. Glenn Todd Ada Co. Court House ACA COCI.',ITY ASSESSOR'S 0: r ICEE Frequently in the treatment of instrcments errors are found sometimes of a- nature which may seriously inpair the validity of the transaction and the purpose for which it Boas excused. These discrepant es are noted -and the attention oF= the parties interested called thereto. An examination of this document discloses the following: NAN Inc. has Sold the propertypin question, to Meridian assocateso Therefore the Plat of " Meadow'View SdibD. " Does Not have the deeded owners name. PRO14PT attention should be given to this notice and a corrected document may be filed as the records ca snot be altered. _ County .455e5so<5 .Office lT� 1�n �•/1.1 /, iLn�.. I,. M1 '7-,T^'cJ7. 19th d: of March 1974 n c;2t�rc3 :i:,';7 ',alai.^ __.•___ :;j by .Zd bet�rae:: uinn-9obbins Co. Inc. aareiri^.;'tcr rE carred to as the subeont*:.r.etor, and N.A.N. Inc. herein.,.fter referred: to .13 the contract -or. TTITP"F35^�'tt: Mat the U�rt'Lon '.!ny^�to, it coi:^ider?tion of the +u7l. n STM t h _ „ ftp c-- _ r tl oll oz • .wi. r1.1 ..l.e.. di (� ♦S nC.r�: 1. f; V �._ e�� u :.:' .:, c�.;iree �] r. r Tn • Subcon .rnc tor. r' rens to do ^rr Porfor.a in aT,rorkmanl3k^n c �nner all Of the Sal?";n.. SE'TFCt c,-'? o�•.e:., nt:r,. )'! ete road :*:�� i ;cludin" r0uj h ;i>;^ curl and -�:i �', c-^��.^::er' rock, ��l amt j�a.vi ! y and ell wntcr rain -q an - a" net.to eachL i' as LO c r plane preparn.1 by O.U.S. Engineers Tac tabovo :'ror'. to o e 6;t --d '%n the Meadow View Subdivision _ eoe?rity or Ada at -'; c o:° Idaho 00116 -.01.1 �bp ,J. nu�7 t up by t,ll t' ,d �.t .: �•�,� V.�-, �.0 vni v.� V i7..v r.. :r.: 1 l c ' n a ..uoCo..t raC;.o), n o 1 t..r t._V-.. Sem 1, 1974 0 a::cl: :ro?_1: to :.icet the approval of cit , 2 co_l.tyv S :d: be ^.cc�2ptCrl by thecontra.otor. The rrjce Tr ich ir, to '_(,,; rZj,j :,L:'eco:.tr^ctor io:,.^ furnis';:iz:;; all materinls ant; ;.)or- o?^';"1nZ ri' i 1n ljoz- -y.,. the ?vo mCiL1o"Ed YOIc not to e:�ces I A it = March 19, 1974 undo { ??:.^3 ices on *„ e p:ray)Os .7. c[.� :it':^:: ;._ r ? etter'--ead of Quinn -Robbins Co. Inc. ^,.re to be used for billing and a:: addition ; or c' clet,' Ons i,ili be priced at the unit Prices attached. Payment on 90 � of co-r:Pleted •.•ror c by the 10th of each month if bills are submittedj'r ki "he 3rd O:'' eooh month. the remaining 10 to be Paid after 30 dad s from ;:ate c^ co;r.?�letio,� a.::d acceptance. Subcontractor a7J,eew to coal*. once rTork iinr.:edihtely^tier notifica- tion by the contv�cto r . Ur. t 2n.'Lu rn^.do to be constructed hr%ve reached the sta-e :-there ;rorl.. to ?)e i�ea^f'orio. or the.mz[ttr:i.a.ls to be furnishcrl can be u ed 1'1 the !SL) ^^. 0]_ tIl:;01— : C tractor is to do such Work 4 l n r: eY--Iedicri t and ra:)Id n. vrtnn.er a , po^^:i.b1A in the usual uanO orderly '•alai'--od o.- connt.ructi0r ar_d is t0 complete s-Ud Mork as soon after commencing ti -,O aTie as it is customary. in isaid line of work. Subcontractor ^Creec to lo ria .' -d. 7•*orlc in r�ccor(labce vrith glans and specifications for t:?n :�7 lr ro^.Ci, all Of V ice said :,orlc and matcri^ls fu-rnis'rc:: ::hal.?. co42'°0_^ , to n.7.1 t'[lE' rcllulrementn Of COL111ty - ordinanceo and 1c *s. acid; rro '4 s:_a.. ' r n1- ' �, p � „n, r•r i I. t>c � „rite L,:ie n n� ov<.1 and ,,,, in,^,pection Of the count -Y -rn xo .hc*.:or,: i^ to be },orfor^�c:d u -r. J-. mater- ials nre 1-0 be fu=ni shed. 1? t ,6c rorld beiar- co:;Str:l4tcri i Li::d^•,r the tt r 1 :�.."..moi c1n!1 �d:tvt,n[Z i .f l.d�. .1. :j i. aV�ii.' o[., caid n s*�e^�.. cn.,.r.on:: o� t,:r. �'ec?^ r.(1. t'a�. M1 ,,:� r.,.,.,., '� Vorlt r.:1 Ci T?]r':tf.'Ti.%�.l.s �'UT':13.:; :cC1 .^,i1^. 1 i ect wit'a oil. Of tic requitee t n of tl2e Pi., r �f.. ^•,d r,•,,.. ^::);v the i;;u eet.i., of „(lo aZ,;e 1 of 2 Pa es PEA 2�a1u/Q r VA. �ro wa_': 3 r. -o I, r,, 7 io:� i %lec.ic;(1 „o�l:�tc�l uxntil f3.nr►.1. in^?"f-c- t , ? ji`)i.'r)'� OU3 :r .e cou . V�� 1 JC11^' CQ11S u1^!tC tC(j :.1:1Qc;1^ �1:1/L (1 j^ ?'1'L by t?=cir i=:^,�ectQr s �rc7.1 a ; acceptance by the contractor and the Notice of Com ? a tion is filo;:. _Tt is f.?rt::er agreed tt-;�t t?_c ;;:z?>c0;� tr1ator w311 carry e11 the Z'leCCOOarf CO??n P't:::.^tiQ'? Qi 1j,1')? ] _ �Y "'or therOtCCt10:1 Oi '?11 the -ar. tie wo:r'�+�+� o.� ro^ d 0 1?r cz e t_en+ c o__ r of o: or in t::e c: t. l oy of tha. tu1der; i,11 m COi^t':'<; Ctor ..nd eu bl.'I.c :1.1abilit�v Insa:;.'1.noo. Lju.bcontrac- o. 1 N A. U Lh e r -- -r. c an, ; o ?. o'► a :. �. _,., , + 1, r .,,.. _t, �:_,. c:,..4�..1� ,C?r ...- r -.lens Tori r. ry an(,,. ^1 Federal and l ^te t^"� +•}C7,;1�LtS � nnul.e t0 ' J 1 Materials ",�, lei::: all0-a the abor a Turn-1o.hed by tue �w:3 der;,"'4r^�'-• subcontractor. V i-. ^ rced and undcrstOCI� thh{; U I— colt tr.,Ctor Ttil' ?1�^ 0v.�!ie or,e yet 0L sur: +::� fPQ*11 ;::1C ^i7^'� �3:'^• i3.n-r :7000 •, i� will. be Paid for by ae Su.ricon V a-. 'rQr. _ In. the evr;•;: s•,P �, ?;cQ-�c,.� i �,,� t :. ., r ,..,. • ., ��_ ^ pa..�d a .tirel y and n �. that 411s 1701rc ::e0d:3 aCG L-,-1-,-3+'::-� .^ � i��,� , ,.r �` � i :li.. %?.)^.r s�iiswa t -t .. y o_. J_ or. order tt)toe eut.l.relf a J• C Or , 1' o :)i!bc on, ba�..v dnr 17 r.!y t^,. .!, �:i.r11(.Qi� +Q n� t^ riolir notlr:A� �3i1r? rC_?^_^ r ,.11r.. r'.1; 0:^..^(' uiir)L1 a to d0 00 the cc -n4 Cy+� .. ,, •. he na;. x,0.1 .. .i:t Lt?^C Shall 1=,, ^ •.i d Ot...e . e"I.-? �rr1 -e :34)CJ1:tr�Ctoi, 7 be _abl-) there:_ore I ,i e,T �,�.� 1. �".i'v .r ? for ^ ` Q - i:n ylt�)Co'1�Y1Z(C-1 '�1?`i–f nj•E'("• .lone moo:. a -vr_o1 o- o,, -..nn ^yam , Qmu,ey N Of ^^I+� tror.c ^n acorea to c -^��� �;.r„ ,� r L- ,., May , " +. !'!,. r:r..' 4:• .ty(1 ',1frr:FQl:?"i i%Y:fl .•1'i(::^t%.�Ci:l'i'rh.'..C�: 7e neces.^•ar G Fo4r OCIf r L, In- Said 71�,;i^i.:?il 1i''•;;;Oltt C%1'3r^'Q ,•lt?rE:.�;C;� ^:1 C1 if In the event contractor engages the services of any attorney for any action brought on or under this contract or for it's enforcement or insdefending any action brought by the -contractor - for whom this roadwork is being constructed or' -by any other subcontractor•due to the fault•of this subcontractor, the subcontractor agrees' to pay a reasonable attorney's fees. Sub- contractor agrees to hold contractor harmless by reason of any damages' inourred'by the contractor through negligence of the subcontract eor to fully efficiently perform his contract and pay such costs, xpenses, damages and/or attorney's fees which the contractor may expend by reason of failure of subcontractor to fully and completely Perform. Thio contract is subject to recording of street improvement loan. Quinn -Robbins Co. I c.'-N.A.P1. Inc. ~ - 703 Americana 81vd.Boise Idaho ..10540 Gallahad ed Boise Idaho • ti 342-3608 376-4321 phone -O C 5162 AAA 1 2 3 UcC1.11rX U Li or V Se OliCy f:.'.:; 'a� r o ' r �� OFFICIALS HERALD J. COX. 4. HELEN RYKER. TREASURER GENE D. HINER, CHIEF OF POLICE NEAL HUDSON, WORD SUPT. JOHN O. FITZGERALD. ATTORNEY ' 23 FIRE CHIEF G " aR OFFICIALS HERALD J. COX. CITY CLERK HELEN RYKER. TREASURER GENE D. HINER, CHIEF OF POLICE NEAL HUDSON, WORD SUPT. JOHN O. FITZGERALD. ATTORNEY ROGER WELKER, FIRE CHIEF 0 HUB OF TREASURE 17ALLEY fAFT A Good Place to Live 723 Meridian Street MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone 888-4433 DON M. STOREY lwayor Dacembe,i. 18, , ? 973 TO 0-10M IT HAY C01,TCII'RN COUNCILMEN JOHN R.NAVARRO KEITH T. ELLIS WAYNE D. SKIVER MARVIN R. BODINE HERALD J. COX, TRAFFIC BUREAU SEC. ZONING & PLANNING This is to inform that on March 26, 1973 tha City o Hor ` dion, a -pp ove -Min plans and z or •"t,ho Hoadow Vichy Stibf- i v s o 97,01y yopL, c � -Dos-1 110 S�®r L� T a yo { rxg x rt '. u { r x; t SY.v Qe I �. A H zc ixIT 6&1 OREANA DRIVE BOISE, IDAHO 83705 0 J BDIVIDER ANNEXATION REQUEST (208) 376-4321 We respectfully request the City of Meridian to annex that certain parcel of land into An corporate limits that is described as follows: See attached legal description. We understand and are willing to accept the Annexation of the above described propertV'onthe basis that there is no guarantee from the Citv of Meridian for water and sewer service to the subject property. We are the fee simple owners of the above described property. June 4, 1973 MONS, INC* W. E. Driscoll Exec. Vice Pres. 9 J -U`1-9 ENGINEERS. INC. 63 Franklin Road • Boise, Idaho 83705 i R Project: 1627 Date: March 21, 1973 DESCRIPTION OF TOTAL NOTEBOOM TRACT FOR N.A.N. INC., PROPOSED SUBDIVISION LYING IN THE NE1/4 SW1/4, SECTION 1 T.3N., R.IW., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO A parcel of land lying in the NE1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 1, T.3N., R.M. B.M., Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the said SW1/4 of Section 1; thence North 0°24'50" West 1,323.80 feet along the Easterly bound- ary of the said SWI/4 of Section 1 to a point marking the Southeast corner of the said NE1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 1, also said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 0024150" West 664.65 feet along the said Easterly boundary of the SW1/4 of Section 1 to a point; thence South 89°39150" West 402.16 feet to a point; -thence North 1°41'10" West 660.75 feet to a point on the Northerly boundary of the said NE1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 1; thence South 89`48'20" West 910.81 feet along the said Northerly boundary of the NEI/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 1 to a point marking the Northwest corner of the said NE1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 1; thence South 0011128" East 860.00 feet along the Westerly bound- ary -of the said NE1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 1 to a point; 'thence North 70000108" East 132.73 feet to a point; thence South 89°59'52" East 419.00 feet along a line Northerly of and parallel to the said Southerly boundary of the NE1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 1 to a point; thence South 75°24'50" East 390.22 feet to a point; thence North 89035110" East 100.00 feet to a point; thence South 0°24150" East 5.00 feet along a line Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the SW1/4 of Section 1 to a point; thence North 89035110" East 150.00 feet to a point; e J-1.1---3 ENGINEERS, INC. 03 Franklin Road . 8015e, Idaho 83705 Project: 1627 Date: March 21, 1973 Page: 2 thence South 0°24150" East 320.00 feet along a line.Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the SW1/4 of Sec- tion 1 to a point; thence North 89°35`10" East 100.00 feet to a point; thence South 002415011 East 84.29 feet along a line 60.00 feet Westerly of and parallel to the said Easterly boundary of the SW1/4 of Section 1 to a point on the said Southerly boundary of the NE1/4 of the SWI/4 of Section 1; thence South 89059'52" East 60.00 feet along the said Southerly boundary of the NE1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 1 to the point of be- ginning, comprising 21.45 acres, more or less.. HJC/GLR:pap -- 4 U July 9 1972 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Meridian Meridian, Idaho Gentlemen: This letter shall serve to obligate the undersigned to pay to the City of Meridian, upon demand, the sum of $100.00 per unit development. (Each unit in a duplex or multi -unit development shall be considered one unit each, i.e., duplex equals two units.) The undersigned represents to the City that they intend to develop 1, ® units within one year from the date of this letter and upon demand from the City will pay $100.00 per unit in cash. Developer will, at the time water is installed to each unit, receive $100.00 credit against whatever the total water hook-up charge may be. •It is specifically understood that this $100.00 figure does not limit the City as to total cost or future cost nor does it have anything to do with any sewer hook-up. The developer is simply prepaying $100.00 per unit against the total cost per unit and at the time the unit is developed shall receive the $100.00 credit. Very truly yours, r P.S. In the event that the developer is putting in trailers, the charge is $75.00 as opposed to $100.00. OFFICIALS HERALD J. COX, CITY CLERK HELEN RYKER, TREASURER GENE D. HINER. CHIEF OF POLICE NEAL HUDSON, WORK SUPT. JOHN O. FITZGERALD, ATTORNEY "Heart of Idaho's Dairydand" A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 728 Meridian, Street MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83SU Phone 8884433 DON M. STOREY Mayor Bill Driscoll 6601 Oreana Boise, ID 83705 June 6, 1972 ,t COUNCILMEN JOHN R. NAVARRO KEITH T. ELLIS WAYNE D. SKIVER MARVIN R. BODINE HERALD J. COX. TRAFFIC BUREAU r J -U -B Engineers Mike Reidy 5903 Franklin Box 828 Boise, Idaho 83705 Boise, ID 83701 The Mayor and Council request that you have representation at a special meeting held at the Meridian City Hall, June 12, 1972 at 7:00 p.m. It is imperative that a representative be present, since it will be impossible for Annexation of the properties involved until Water and Sewer problems have been solved, e Don M. Storey Mayor DMS : las cc: Harold Klefman, Treasure Valley Homes Inc. Stubblefield Development Leonard Evans E. L. Beus Burton Smith Jack ^owdle j -U -B engineers, Boase and pampa avatika .Bill ."riscoll Mike Reid Bill Chander Jim Richey •