Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMeadow View No. 2d¢' El • CITY OF MERIDIAN • 728 Meridian St. Meridian, ID 83642 VARIANCE APPLICATION (RE: Meridian Zoning Ordinance NAME: lts�'7 P, [%a.1✓K �,- er or holler of va i i a option ADDRESS: q � 6 -Al' _ zs', L ®T j" PHONE 9�Z GENERAL LOCATION: `! er,° 01eLc-y--,_, LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: l0 `3 /' 0 7—' 67- / 21 - PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR VALID OPTION: A copy of your property deed or option agreement must be attached. PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATIONL� VICINITY SKETCH: A vicinity map at a scale approved by the Mayor showing property lines, streets existing and proposed zoning and such other items as the Mayor may require. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS A list of all property owners and addresses within contiguous to, directly across the .street from, .and within a 300' radius of the parcel (s) proposed for a Variance must be attached. (This information is availabl,��f��m the County Assessor.) - DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE: �0 e— -74'- "'j e,." SIGNATURE: CITY COUNCIL RECORDS Date Receive Received t �� n� City Council Hearing Date CV�9� • REQUIREMENTS: VARIANCE • Attach a site plan showing all details of the proposed development, Complete the following questions and return with the application. 1. What is intended to be done on or with the property? 2. What special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands. structures, or buildings in the same district? 3. Why will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance deprive you of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance? 4. What special conditions or circumstances exist that were not a result of your actions? 5. Why will the granting of this Variance not confer on you - any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structures, or building in the same district? err ne' peS 0 q o. variance. 40 build- a. 90 o al. �� • �or►� e- . 466'1 l are Jad klou►5 : 0 1roA Je- on #e- /1o11' h0MO-6 are. &7;--yOI"-Od a" 4d' %.� i rl q // l.(�e rJocJ h"le Qn /A 40re'Sled 6u-�/er �'�" i S lie �ds� 161' aa=;1&Z1e- �n _ �oin��q ltam�6 Aa a - In,4;nq o,.r l00 u4des:re"Ie . M EADOW VI EW NO. i LJ is PRINTED -3-m-Bd FOR DATE ❑ REFERENCE � REVIE' W/APPROVAL ❑ CONSTRUCTION STEVEN W. HOSAC rZor 0 091 Consulting Civil Enginccr 2121 NOWTH COU WOAD TELEPHONE MSE, IDAHO 13704 120M 3757100 VICINITY MAP MERIDIAN MANOR NO. 3 MEADOWVIEW NO.2 SUBDIVISION 4 0 'ALEXANDER, Nolan Derk & Tina R. IG'r I Fairwood Meri¢ian,'Idaho 83642 Lot 21 Block 12 iTLIN., Mary H. 1111 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 20 Block 12 BASURA, L P. 2252 lth Ave. Me ian, Idaho 83642 of 18 Block 12 BRADSHAW, Larry E. & Susan L. 1077 Fairwood Ct. Meridian, Idaho 83642 �. Lot 23 Block 12 TAYLOR, Robert Mike & Gail 1053 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 24 Block 12 JENKINS, Keith B. P.O.Box 5597 '✓ �c��� Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 26 Block 12 ` PEUGH, Clayton H. & Vickie D. (, 1012 Fairwood Ct. 1"JI/ Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 27 Block 12 BROOKS, Monte E. & Gaye A. 1034 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 28 Block 12 GAROUTTE, Greg & Rita 1054 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 29 Block 12 BROWNING, Wallace III & Sheila 1078 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 30 Block 12 SECRETARY OF HOUSING & URBAN DEV. P.O.Box 42 Boise, Idaho 83704 Lot 31 Block 12 �r u 0% MARSHAW, Richard A. & Lee Sherry ,_-T092 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 32 Block 12 KIRSCH, Robert & Kathleen T. 112 Fairwood 7 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 33 Block 12 HEFNER, Sharon K. 1142 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 34 Block 12 NEISEN, Randolph A. & LeAnn M. 122 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot.16 Block 12 ROWELL, Daniel E,,.-� Shelly J. 2222 NW 11th -j Meridian1-7Tdaho 83642 Lot,17J Block 12 CARROLL, Phillip R. & Theresa M. 1080 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 14 Block 12 OUGHTY, Ronald Steven & Carol it 1074 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 13 Block 12 u2,�Y°S a:1' r . ti s r ORALES, Raul 1052 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 12, Block 12 z r toormation on Lots.11, 10, 09, 0807, 06, 05, 04 Block 12 Lots Account'I's Names Address 11 38818 Corey S. Watson 1014 Delmar Drive 10 38816 Floyd Thomas 1002 Delmar Drive 09 38814 Evan J. Royal 2221 N.W. 10th Street 08 38812 Roberta Short 2231 N.W. 10th Street 07 38810 Lynn D. Olsen 2241 N.W. 10th Ave 06 38808 Vacant Lot Vacant Lot 05 38806 Gary L..TWplin 2261 2261 N.W. 10th Ave 04 38804 Twayne Walker -- 2271 N.W. 10th Street prof y�� _i 9048'20"W 15c�).0 0' 01 'e e� of c to -I tv 1 1 N__Oo I -I' 17" W _ 139.97' 0 S 89048'20"W • 641.42' '75.00' i 7500' 75.0: S83005 14"E 'w-- 1es.28o CHATEAUses04eo DRIVE "' 4e7 17'17' '" o W'39 a 42 70.00'' a> 70.00' -1 3 96.23' m 97 Oil ad •' Q FAIRWOOD _s e9.46'2o'w o COURT 416.20' S�H„OHIO 3 Imn .00' m 25 iac= v- 7 BQ�➢"r �� 2.50' 873 u 77 �_'�, � � % „ °. rte- • :�'� `!i 6..�... � a, �' 3.'"G J - _� PY '�.,rsr '�� �l „y_ o S 9904820" W S 99�48'20�TL-2 ] f o tl 0-24 I� r ` Q =f ” Qc�fu 172 Os, MENEM 00 TS B9059'52"E 5.38' N 700 00'08" E 132.73' F< .t { � 4Nk Yr3 ex $� 119_ cn 419.00'-� ; S'?So2 UN PLATTED SO'� 390 N 690,35'10" E 100.00'- S 00 24'50" 0 0 R L MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MARCH 15, 1988 Regular Meeting of the Meridian City Council called to order by Acting Mayor Bill Brewer.at 7:30 p.m.: Members Present: Ron Tolsma, Bob Giesler, Bert Myers: Members Absent: Mayor Grant Kingsford: Others Present: Ray & Jane Fisher, Howard & Ruby Brown, Rus & Sonia Heyghins, Joyce Borup, Carolyn Shadduck, Tamera Perkins, Trudee Hadley, Denise Sturgis, Debra Cavanaugh, Judy Todd, Tonia Schondal, Jean Jordan, Lori Babbitt, Susan Bernen, Mary Wilson, Wanda Michaelson, James Gipson, Al Lance, Twayne Walker, Gary Smith, Earl Ward, Bob Mitich, Kenny Bowers, Wayne Crookston. The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Tolsma to approve the Minutes of the previous meeting held March 1, 1988 as written: Motion Carried: All Yea: Acting Mayor Brewer read a Resolution of the American People to adopt the fundamental principal of NO USE OF ANY ILLEGAL DRUG and NO ILLEGAL USE OF ANY LEGAL DRUG. Item fl-: Public Hearing: Variance Request by Twayne Walker on ouse -Square Footage: Brewer: Is there anyone here to to represent this request, if so would they please come forward and give their name for the record. Mr. Twayne Walker 3965 N. Eagle Road, Mr. Walker was sworn by the City Attorney. Walker: I would like to have a Variance for the remaining Lot on Fairwood Court in Meadow View Subdivision, I need this Variance to be able to construct a 900 square foot home on this lot, the way this lot is situated in there it is°'difficult one to sell and we would like to build a home in there that would meet the needs of a potential buyer. I just found out last week that the home next to this lot is four feet over on this lot which make it smaller than ever.but even with this with the Variance we could still build the 900 square foot home and be able to meet the setback requirements. Brewer: I will now open the PUblic Hearing, is there anyone else in the audience who wishes to testify on this matter? Alan Lance, 77 East Idaho, Mr. Lance was sworn by the City Attorney. Lance: I am not here to support or to oppose Mr. Walkers request, I am here as a matter of information , I represent Mr.& Mrs. Schondal who own Lot 24 in Meadow View II Subdivision, it is that lot and their home that encroachs by approximately five feet on Mr. Walker's Lot, the Title Companies have been notified of the error, we have had the property surveyed to definitely establish the lot line, I would like to present this information to the City Clerk, that we have on a drawing here to show MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL • MARCH 15, 1988 PAGE # 2 the encroachment. That is all I have unless there are some questions. --ewer: Are there any questions of the Council? Myers: What was this a mismeasurement when it was built? Lance: My client did not build the home,they bought the ;structure in 1987, I believe the former owners had it built and I do not know why it was built over the property line. City Attorney: Do you have any feelings one way or the other whether tnis encroachment effects the issue of the variance? Lance: Assuming that the five foot strip is purchased from Mr. Walker, it would reduce his lot size from about 4900 square feet to less than 4500 square feet, I am not in a position to comme,it on that but that is one of our concerns this body granting a variance keeping in mind that this lot will be smaller if we can negotiate a sale of the five feet. City Attorney: Are you specifically objecting to the granting of the Variance? Lance: No. Brewer: Is there anyone else form the public who wishes to testify? Evan Royal, 2221 NW 10th, Mr. Royal was sworn by the City Attorney: Royal: I am of the opinion, with just the one lot Left, if someone wants to build a 900 square foot house on that lot they should be allowed to do so. Brewer:Is there anyone else who wishes to testify, there was no response, the Public Hearing was closed. We have Preliminary Findings of Fact on this request, what is the Council's pleasure? Giesler: I have a couple of questions, can this be approved with this pending? City Attorney: It can De approved, there is no objection to the granting of the Variance, it is up to the Council as to whether or not they want to grant it. Giesler: Are you in fact sure that is the last lot in the subdivision? Walker: The last one on that culdesac, there are two other lots I own on NW 10th, one I am building on the other is still for sale. Crookston: The Findings of Fact should be amended to reflect that this is the last lot in the culdesac and also to include the testimony made here tonite or else redo the Findings, it would probably be more conv- ient for Mr. Walker if you are going to approve to incorporate the testimony tonite. The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Giesler to amend the Findings of Fact that this is not the last lot in the Subdivision and to also incorporate the testimony presented tonite at the Public Hearing Mr,RIDIAN CITY COUNCIL 0 MARCH 15, 1988 PAGE # 3 into the Findings of Fact that were prepared by the City Attorney. Motion Carried: All Yea: The Motion was made by Myers and seconded Ay Tolsma that the City Council of the City of Meridian does hereby adopt and approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions ?s amended. Motion Carried: Roll Call Vote: Giesler, Yea: Myers, Yea: Tolsma, Yea: Brewer, Yea: The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Tolsma to approve of the Variance request by Twayne Walker to construct a nine hundred square foot home on Lot # 25 Block 12 of Meadow View #II Subdivision. Motion Carried: All Yea: Item # 2: Public Hearing: Annexation & Zoning Request w/Conditional Use Permit by Church of Latter Day Saints: Brewer: Is there anyone in the audience who represents this request? James Gipson, 82 East State St. Eagle, Idaho, Mr. Gipson was sworn by the City Attorney. Gipson: This project is to be located on Ten Mile Road on a five acre parcel south of Cherry Lane, it is a church project as illustrated in the picture before you, it will accomodate two existing wards of the church, the people are already living in the area and are presently attending church at another building which is considerably further away, there are aoout four hundred members per ward, so this facility would serve about eight hundred members, there would be at the church on Sunday which is the day of heaviest use approximately 120 cars at one time, We have worked with the appropriate utilities and other public services and feel all the conditions are appropriate for this development and do not forsee any unusual problems. Brewer: Does the Council have any questions of Mr. Gipson? Giesler: The only thing I would like to ask is there is nothing sure what you are going to do with the sewer being it is so far away, what is your decision on this? Gipson: We have pursued that question rather diligently over the past months, there are two available and resonable options, one is to put in a septic system for the facility, the other is to construct a distance of sewer line and hook in to the sewer, that appears now that this would be a very feasible option and that is probably the way we will go but either way would work as far as the Health Department is concern- ed, ground water testing can not be completed until the high irrigation season but the information we have so far indicates the septic system would work. It is the desire of the applicant to construct the sewer and connect to the sewer, that we believe will work with the cooperation of one or two of the other property owners. %MBR08E, TZOERALD- :ROOK8TON Wme" and :Ouneelo►e .O. Box 4V (WIM, WOO emu )WM 8884481 0 0 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN APPLICATION OF TWAYNE WALKER FOR A VARIANCE AT 1033 FAIRWOOD COURT PRE-LIMINARY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The above entitled variance request having come on for consideration on March 15, 1988, at approximately 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the City Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony, the City Council of the City of Meridian makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of the public hearing on the variance was published for two consecutive weeks prior to the scheduled hearing for March 15, 1988, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the March 15, 1988 hearing; that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. -That the notice of public hearing is required to be sent to property owners within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the land being. considered pursuant to 11-2-416 E and 11-2-419 D of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that this requirement has been met. WBROSE, ,TZGERALD )ROOKSTON tometn and JOYn"W8 .O. Box 427 ddlan, WOO 83612 ,haft 88&1481 0 • 3. That the Plat of Meadowview Subdivision No. 2 requires certain size homes to be constructed on certain lots all as allowed under section 11-2-411 and its predessessor ordinances; that the lot in question, Lot 25, Block 128 Meadowview Subdivision No. 2 must have a 1200 square foot or larger home consructed thereon; that 11-2-411 D 1 allows no single family I I houses to be constructed less than 999 square feet; that this I i particular subdivision was granted a prior variance to the I housing square footage requirements. 4. That the Applicant has requested that he not be required to build a 1200 square foot home; Applicant has requested to be allowed to construct a 900 square foot single family dwelling. 5. The size of the lot in question is approximately 85 x I 57 or approximately 4,845 square feet. 6. That the set back ordinances require a 5 foot side set back on each side of the structure, a 20 foot yard front set back and a 15 foot rear yard set back, the maximum possible square footage a residential structure, including garage, could contain 1 i on the lot, is 2350 square feet. 7. That the houses in the immediate area are generally of a size similar to 900 to 1,000 square feet. 8. That the lot is zoned R-4 Residential; that some of the lots are "O" lot line lots; that Applicant would have to meet the set back requirements, if applicable. WBROK TZGERALD 1ROOKSTON tom ys and :ounsslon O. Box 427 A lsn, Idea 83642 Mom 8884/61 9. That the plans show that a single family dwelling will be construed. 10. That the Applicant set forth the following pertinent comments as his reasons for justification of the variance the following: 1) Lack of frontage on the lot; 2) Adjoining homes are misplaced on their lots, making the subject lot undesireable; 3) Applicant has an interested buyer for the lot and a small home; 4) The lot is the last lot available in the subdivision because of its layout and location; 5) Adjoining homes have the same approximate square footage. 11. That the misplacement of adjoining homes is not due to the action of the Applicant; that the "O" lot line configuration had no beginning or end point such that ultimately one lot was bound to be "squeezed". 12. That these Findings of Fact were made preliminarily and may have to be changed, altered, or amended as a result of the public hearing. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local %MBROSE, TZQERALD ;ROOKSTON tornsye wd ;ounsaltua O. Box 427 rldtan, Idaho 83812 ,""8894i81 Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City has authority to grant variances pursuant to Section 11-2-419 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. That the City Council has judged this application by I the guidelines, standards, criteria, and policies contained in the Zoning Ordinance and upon the record submitted to it and the I things upon which it may take judicial notice. I 4. That the Council may take judicial notice of its own proceedings, those of the Commission, governmental statutes, ' i ordinances, and policies, and. of actual conditions existing i within the City and the State. f 5. That the following provisions of Section 11-2-419, j Variances, of the Zoning Ordinance is noted which is pertinent to Ii the Application: 11-2-419 A GENERAL The Council may authorize in specific cases a variance i from the terms of this Ordinance as will not be contrary to the public interest where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. No non -conforming use of neighboring land, structures or buildings in the same district and no permited or non- conforming use of lands, structures or buildings in other districts shall be considered grounds for issuance of a variance. Variances shall be granted only where strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. A variance application does not go to the Commission unless directed by the Council. MBROse TZGERALD :ROOKSMN tomays and 0.81ox4" ddlan, Idaho 83842 pans 888401 • • 6. That the specific requirements regarding a variance that must be evidenced and found by the City Council are as follows: 11-2-419 C FINDINGS A variance shall not be granted uriless (as a result of a public hearing) the Council makes a statement of supportive reasons based directly on the evidence presented to it which supports conclusions that the mentioned standards and conditions of this Ordinance have been met by the applicant and unless all of the following exist: 1. That there are such special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict j application of the provisions of this Ordinance would clearly be impracticable or unreasonable; 2. That strict compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance would result in extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because of unusual topography, other physical conditions or other conditions which are not self-inflicted, or that these conditions will result in inhibiting the achievements or the objectives of this Ordinance. 3. That the granting of the specified variance will not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated. 4. That such variance will not have the effect of altering the interest and purpose of this Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 7. That the consideration of profit, economic gain or convenience to the Applicant was removed from the variance ordinance regarding specific findings. WEIROSE, .TZOERALD :ROOKSTON tomeys and Xunselon O. Box 427 tidtan, Idaho 83812 ,hons888.1181 • 8. That since this is the last lot in the subdivision available for construction it is concluded to be in the best interest of the surrounding homes, and owners thereof, and of the City, that it is better to have a smaller home constructed on the lot rather than continue to have a weed patch, which would be a fire hazard. 9. That regarding Section 11-2-419C it is specifically concluded as follows: a. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance and the Plat of Meadowview Subdivision No. 2 would clearly be unreasonable when most structures in the area are of similar size as the one proposed. b. That strict compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance would result in extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because of unusual topography, other physical conditions or other conditions which are not self- inflicted; c. That the granting of the specified variance would not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situtated; d. That such variance would not have the effect of altering the interest and purpose of this Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The City Council of the City of Meridian does hereby adopt and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL: APPROVED: %MBROSE, TZGERALD :ROOKSTON tonne" Mm Aun WM O. Box 127 rldhu% Idaho 838{2 ,h"886401 DISAPPROVED: Councilman Giesler Voted Councilman Myers Vote Councilman Tolsma VotedL Councilman Brewer Voted Mayor Kingsford (Tie Breaker) Voted APPROVED: %MBROSE, TZGERALD :ROOKSTON tonne" Mm Aun WM O. Box 127 rldhu% Idaho 838{2 ,h"886401 DISAPPROVED: 0 0 TOOTHMAN-ORTON ENGINEERING COMPANY DAVIS C. TOOTHMAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS PAULS.KUNZ RICHARD F. ORTON, JR. 1802 NORTH 33RD STREET DON G. PAYNE BOISE, IDAHO 83703 TELEPHONE (208) 342-5511 C(OP r Alan G. Lance Foley & Lance Heritage Building, Suite 300 77 East Idaho Street P.O. Box 814 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Mr. Lance: Enclosed please find three copies of the survey we performed for Mr. and Mrs. James Schondel in MEADOWVIEW NO. 2 SUBDIVISION. The house encroaches onto Lot 25 by approximately five feet (from the eave overhang to the property line). Because there is zero setback on these lots, I have shown a proposed lot line 3.00 feet from the building wall which would leave 0.9 feet from the eave overhang to the proposed lot line. This would prevent anyone from Lot 25 building right up to the edge of the overhang. I have not set any pins to mark the new boundary corners at this time. If the proposed lot line is agreeable to all the parties involved, let me know and I will set the new boundary corners and file the record of survey. If it is not agreeable, let me know and I will make the necessary changes on the drawing, set the boundary corners and file the record of survey. If you have any questions or need me to attend the Planning and Zoning meeting to answer any questions about the survey, please contact me. Sincerely, T RTO GINEERING COMPANY Benn , L.S. Chief of Surveys NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., on March 15, 1988, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of Twayne Walker for a variance from Section 11-2-411(D) Detached Housing Square Footage Requirements which require a 1200 square foot house be built on Lot 25, Block 12, Meadowview Subdivision No. 2. The Applicant proposes to construct a 900 square foot home on the Lot. A more particular legal description is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Meridian and is available upon request. Public comment will be taken and is welcome. Ja0k Niemann, City Clerk AMBROSE, FITZGERALD & CROOKSTON Ariomeys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridien, Idaho 83842 Telephone 886.4481 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., on March 15, 1988, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of Twayne Walker for a variance from Section 11-2-411(D) Detached Housing Square Footage Requirements which require a 1200 square foot house be built on Lot 25, Block 12, Meadowview Subdivision No. 2. The Applicant proposes to construct a 900 square foot home on the Lot. A more particular legal description is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Meridian and is available upon request. Public comment will be taken and is welcome. NBROSE, TZGERALO ;ROOKSTON tomeye and .ouneelom O. Box 427 ridlan, Idaho hony83u542e8 .., JackjNiemann/ City Clerk 4ormation on Lots 11, 1'), 09, C'• 07, 06, 05, 04 ck 12 Lots Account Ps Names Address 11 38818 Colrey S. Watson 1014 Delmar Drive 10 38816 Foyd Thomas 1002 Delmar Drive 09 38814 Evan J. Royal 2221 N.W. 10th Str6et 08 38812 'r Roberta Short 2231 N.W. 10th Street 07 38810 Lynn D. Olsen 2241 N.W. 10th Ave 06 38808 Vacant Lot Vacant Lot 05 38806 Gary L.-Templin 2261 2261 N.W. 10th Ave II 04 38804 Twayne Walker - 2271 N.W. 10th Street Beehive Shelter Home 1081 Fairwood Ct. X 10RI Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 21 Block 12 TU IN, Mary H. 1111 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 3642 Lot 20 Bloc i ASURA, LYAd P. lth Ave. Me ian, aho 83642 Block 12 BRADSHAW, Larry E. G Sus L 1077 Fairwood Ct. ) Meridian, Idaho 83642 ;. Lot 23 Block 12 TAYLOR Robert Mike� Gail 1053 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 24 _ -Bleck 12 1 Q JENK S, eith B. P. 0. Bc� ` 5597 �d� Mer" , Idaho 836 KfI UGHTY, Ronald Steven rol 1074 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 8 642 Lot 13 Block 12 RALES, Raul 1052 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 12 Block 12If 10 �i r HAW, Richard A. G Lee .092 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 32 Block 12 ,/KIRSCH, Rob G oKathleen T. od 112 a' Merid an, Idaho 83642 Lot 33 Block 12 HEFNER, Sha n K. 1142 Fa ood Meridi , Idaho 83642 Lot 34 Block 12 JNEI$EN, Randolph AG M. 122 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 8 . 642 Lot -16 Block 12 ROW. Daniel Shells J. 12 ¢ARROLL, Phillip R. G Theresa 1080 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lots 14 Block PEUGH, Clayton H. G�Yickie D. 1012 Fairwood Ct. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 27 Block 12 B , Monte E. G Gaye 1034 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho ,83 Lot AROUTTE, Greg G ita 1054 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 29 Block BROWNING, Wallace III G Sheila 1078 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 30 Block -12 SECRETARY OF HOUSING G ORB DEV. P.O.Box 42 Boise, Idaho 83704 Lot 31 Block 12 / 4 I 0 G, 0, U300 16 . H% 3 t. X 10RI Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 21 Block 12 TU IN, Mary H. 1111 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 3642 Lot 20 Bloc i ASURA, LYAd P. lth Ave. Me ian, aho 83642 Block 12 BRADSHAW, Larry E. G Sus L 1077 Fairwood Ct. ) Meridian, Idaho 83642 ;. Lot 23 Block 12 TAYLOR Robert Mike� Gail 1053 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 24 _ -Bleck 12 1 Q JENK S, eith B. P. 0. Bc� ` 5597 �d� Mer" , Idaho 836 KfI UGHTY, Ronald Steven rol 1074 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 8 642 Lot 13 Block 12 RALES, Raul 1052 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 12 Block 12If 10 �i r HAW, Richard A. G Lee .092 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 32 Block 12 ,/KIRSCH, Rob G oKathleen T. od 112 a' Merid an, Idaho 83642 Lot 33 Block 12 HEFNER, Sha n K. 1142 Fa ood Meridi , Idaho 83642 Lot 34 Block 12 JNEI$EN, Randolph AG M. 122 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 8 . 642 Lot -16 Block 12 ROW. Daniel Shells J. 12 ¢ARROLL, Phillip R. G Theresa 1080 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lots 14 Block PEUGH, Clayton H. G�Yickie D. 1012 Fairwood Ct. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 27 Block 12 B , Monte E. G Gaye 1034 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho ,83 Lot AROUTTE, Greg G ita 1054 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 29 Block BROWNING, Wallace III G Sheila 1078 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 30 Block -12 SECRETARY OF HOUSING G ORB DEV. P.O.Box 42 Boise, Idaho 83704 Lot 31 Block 12 / 4 I 0 G, 0, U300 16 . 1 • 9 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 4, 1987 Regular Meeting of the Meridian City Council called to order by Mayor Grant Kingsford at 7:30 -p.m.: Members Present: Bill Brewer, Ron Tolsma, Bert Myers, Bob Giesler: Others Present: Steve Michels, Dennis Butterfield, Kevin Keyt, Julia Stacey, Linda Heinrichs, Betty Raynor, Terry & Nancy Fairchild, Rich Allison, Mike Twitchell, Bonnie & Don Kelso, K.D. & LaVerne Hartwell, Robin Prindle, Twayne Walker, Don Hubble, Steve Wherry, Members of Scout Troop #190, Dennis Clark, Dennis Kelly, Wayne Crookston, Bob Mitich, Walt Morrow, Roy Porter, Gary Smith. The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Giesler to approve the minutes of the previous meeting held July 21, 1987 as written: Motion Carried: All Yea: item #plc Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Variance Request by Robin Prindle: The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Giesler to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as prepared on the Variance request by Robin Prindle: Motion Carried: Giesler, Yea: Myers, Nay: Tolsma, Yea: Brewer, Yea: The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Giesler to approve the Variance from the 35% lot coverage as requested by.Robin Prindle: Motion Carried: Brewer, Yea: Tolsma, Yea: Giesler, Yea: Myers, Nay:' Item #2: Public Hearing: Rezone Request by Bonnie Kelso: Mayor Kingsford: Mrs. Kelso would you like to come forward and advise the Council what you are planning on doing, You-wi1'1'-also need to be sworn and I will open the Public Hearing at this time. Bonnie Kelso was sworn by the City Attorney: Kelso: My proposal is to put an antique at my property located at 1403 East First Stxeet if the rezone is granted. We plan to put in a circle driveway in front of the house and landscape on the street side of the circle. Mayor Kingsford: Any questions of the Council? Giesler: Will there be items out in the yard? Kelso: No, definately not. Myers: Did you have any problems with the City Engineers comments, mainly the parking and such? Kelso: There would be parking to the North side of the house, there is thirty three feet there. k AMBROSE, FITZGERALD SCROOKSTON AUOM*VS and Courmom P.O. Box 127 MMldlan, kWW b3E42 tphon�l061/e1 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN APPLICATION OF ROBIN PRINDLE FOR A VARIANCE AT 1081 FAIRWOOD COURT The above entitled variance request having come on for consideration on July 7, 1987, at approximately 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 728 Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the City Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony, the City Council of the City of Meridian makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of the public hearing on the variance was published for two consecutive weeks prior to the scheduled hearing for July 7, 1987, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the July 7, 1987 hearing; that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That the notice of public hearing is required to be sent to property owners within 300 feet of the external oundaries of the land being considered pursuant to 11-2-416 E nd 11-2-419 D of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City f Meridian; that this requirement has been met. 3. That the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, 11-2-410A, oning Schedule of Bulk and Coverage require in the R-4, AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Coueu h n P.O. Box 4V Mw wm. kww 59047 Asphono080M81 r 1 U Residential District, that no more than 35% of the lot can be covered with a residential structure, however, a garage area shall not be included in the computation of the 35%; that this Ordinance provision was initially passed April 2, 1984, as part of the new Zoning Ordinances of the City of Meridian and later amended which amendment allowed the garage area not be included in the 35%; that under the old zoning ordinances there was no such restriction. 4. That the Applicant has requested that he not be limited to 35% lot coverage; Applicant has requested to be allowed to construct a 2,686 square foot single family dwelling when the 35% rule would allow only 2,025 square feet; that the Appliant's plans do not include a garage; that a standard two car garage would contain approximately between 400 to 500 squar feet and a three car garage could contain in excess of 600 to 700 square feet. 5. The size of the lot in question is 55 x 100 or 5,500 square feet. 6. That under the present set back ordinances, which require a 5 foot side set back on each side of the structure, a 20 foot yard front set back and a 15 foot rear yard set back, the maximum possible square footage a residential structure, including garage, could contain on a 5500 square foot lot, is 3375 square feet; applying the 35% lot coverage for the residence, not including the garage, there is the possibility of a i 3 4, r K r 5 � '�#����q� "�,��m Y t xl z .},. 4"M 77 e xs -{ a#iR!z 3" E P k *.� yP.N % V .�y 3 4'A, d k q. DYR.1" r 03't �y" Pb'' kr e s r '*r t y.: ws, AM SROSE, FRZOERALD BCROOKSTON AtWne" mW Cwuaslom P.O. Box 427 MMdlui, Maho 83012 46pUOM 8864401 building a 21025 foot house and a garage of 1,350 square feet, for a total structure of 3,375 square feet. 7. That the subdivision within which the lot is contained as approved prior to the adoption of 11-2-410A. 8. That the lot is zoned R-4 Residential which thus can my be used for single family dwellings. 9. That the use to which the Applicant proposes to put the lot is a shelter home which is licensed and regulated by the Department of Health and Welfare; the home is to be constructed to house eight people; that for purposes of this Application it is assumed that the Applicant is proceeding to obtain a home shelter care license from the State of Idaho Department of Health & Welfare such that the provisions of 67-6530 through 67-6532, Idaho Code, apply to the zoning; that there was no evidence presented by the Applicant that the residents would be mentally or physically handicapped as referrenced in those code sections. 10. That the plans show that all set back requirements of 11-2-410A will be met. 11. That the Applicant set forth the following pertinent comments as his reasons for justification of the variance the following: that in order for the project to be economical to him he had to have eight residents in the shelter home and in order to have eight residents he needed to have 2,686 square feet; that the structure would comply with the set back requirements of the R-4 zone; that there would be no garage; that there would be no AMBROSE, FnZGERALO 6OROOKSTON Attorneys wW Qoirm"M P.O. Box 427 aluldlrn, Idaho =0 0 additional traffic; that there would be no additional noise; that the home was designed to fit on the lot; that the backyard would be fenced; the Applicant submittedd no other testimony or evidence for the requirements set forth in 11-2-419 for the granting of a variance. 12. That there was public comment submitted in opposition to the variance; that most of the comments centered around the use of a shelter home rather than the question before the Council of a variance to the 358 lot coverage requirement; that the comments in opposition to the variance that were pertinent are as follows: the lot was too small for the structure; the largeness of the structure was out -of -place in relation to the smaller size homes in the area; that there was a 358 maximum lot coverage in the zone, R-4; and that such a facility would increase traffic in the area which would be detrimental to the many children in the area which play in the street. 13. That the Application shows the Applicant entered -into a contract to purchase the lot in question on February 19, 1987; that the Applicant did, thus, not own the lot prior to the adoption of the 358 requirement. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of.the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's X a, AMBROSE, FITZGERALD dCROOKSTON Attomays arid Counselors P.O. Box 127 MwIdlai, Idaho 83612 3Isplwns8664141 is property. 2. That the City has authority to grant variances pursuant to Section 11-2-419 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. That the City Council has judged this application by the guidelines, standards, criteria, and policies contained in the Zoning Ordinance and upon the record submitted to it and the things upon which it may take judicial notice. 4. That the Council may take judicial notice of its own proceedings, those of the Commission, governmental statutes, ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and the State. 5. That the following provisions of the Zoning Ordinance not relating to Variances are pertinent to this Application: 2-405 A INTERPRETATION 1. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: The provisions herein shall be held to be the minimum requirements for the promotion of the public health, safety, morals and welfare. 2. RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER LAWS: Where the conditions imposed by any provision herein upon the use of land or buildings or upon the bulk of buildings are either more restrictive or less restrictive than comparable conditions imposed by any other provisions herein or any other law, ordinance, resolution, rule or regulation of any kind, the regulations which are more restrictive or which imposed higher standards or requirements shall govern. 2-405 C USE AND BULK REGULATIONS 1. USE: A building, structure or land shall hereafter be used or occupied, and a building or part thereof, or other structure, shall be erected, raised, moved, re - L: AMBROSE, FITZGERALD 3CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridian, Idaho 83842 lephone 8881481 constructed, extended, enlarged or altered only as in conformity with the regulations herein specified for the district in which it is located. Exceptions to the use and bulk regulations of this Ordinance shall be only by Conditional Use. 2. BULK: All new buildings and structures shall conform to the regulations established herein for the district in which each building shall be located except as other wise permiteed in this Ordinance by Conditional Use. 2-406 C SINGLE NON -CONFORMING LOTS OF RECORD In any district in which single-family dwellings are permitted, a single-family dwelling and customary accessory buildings may be erected on any single lot of record (see definition of lot of record) at the effective date of adoption or amendment of this Ordinance, notwithstanding limitations imposed by other provisions of this Ordinance. Such lot must be in separate ownership and not of continuous frontage with other lots in the same ownership. This provision shall apply even though such lot fails to meet the requirements for area or width, or both, that are generally applicable in the district, provided that yard dimensions.and requirements other than those applying to area or width, or both, of the lot shall conform to the regulations for the district in which such lot is located. 6. That the above section 2-406 C is interpretted to mean that an existing lot of record need not comply with the area and width requirements of the Zoning Ordinance but must comply with "yard dimensions and requirements other than those applying to area or width, or both," which thusly means compliance with lot coverage restrictions= however, the section and 2-405 Cr quoted above, do evidence an intent to allow previously existing lots to I be built upon even though they may not meet all of the current i I requirements, so long as a conditional use or variance or other 0 such waiver is granted by the City. 7. That the following provisions of Section 11-2-419, Variances, of the Zoning Ordinance is noted which is pertinent to the Application: 11-2-419 A GENERAL The Council may authorize in specific cases a variance from the terms of this Ordinance as will not be contrary to the public interest where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. No non -conforming use of neighboring land, structures or buildings in the same district and no permited or non- conforming use of lands, structures or buildings in other districts shall be considered grounds for issuance of a variance. Variances shall not be granted on the grounds of convenience or profit, but only where strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. A variance application does not go to the Commission unless directed by the Council. 8. That the specific requirements regarding a variance that must be evidenced and found by the City Council are as follows: 11-2-419 C FINDINGS A variance shall not be granted unless (as a result of a public hearing) the Council makes a statement of supportive reasons based directly on the evidence presented to it which supports conclusions that the mentioned standards and conditions of this Ordinance have been met by the applicant and unless all of the following exist: 1. That there are such special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would clearly be impracticable or unreasonable; AMBROSE, FITZGERALD 3CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 127 Aerldlen, Idaho 83812 ,ephone8884181 AMBROSE, FITZGERALD 4CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Bos 427 derldlan, Idaho 83842 iaplwm 8881181 0 2. That strict compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance would result in extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because of unusual topography, other physical conditions or other conditions which are not self-inflicted, or that these conditions will result in inhibiting the achievements or the objectives of this Ordinance. 3. That the granting of the specified variance will not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated. 4. That such variance will not have the effect of altering the interest and purpose of this Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. That the provisions of Idaho Code, Sections 67-6530, 67-6531 and 67-6532, are noted in that a shelter home is treated as a single family dwelling; that Section 67-6532 (c) states "No local ordinances or local restrictions shall be applied to or required for a residential facility which serves eight (8) or fewer mentally and/or physically handicapped persons and is supervised as required in Section 67-6531, Idaho Code, which is not applied to or required for a single family dwelling in the same zone"; that it is concluded that Sections 67-6530 through 67-6532 evidence a strong legislative intent and purpose to allow shelter homes in residential areas. 10. That it is concluded that the comments in objection to Ithe variance other than as noted.in Paragraph 12 of the Findings, e irrelevant to the issue and were not a basis of denying the ication. b L3 a✓ N, WO x E ro I sF F Y ��L F"A .ck hF'r3y',J Ilk s�R, J Q1 V I � t� a W wig E r: i� a AMBROSE, FITZGERALD ICROOKSTON A8ome7ealld Counswom P.O. Bos 427 AONdlan, Idaho 83612 sphon@ 8884481 11. That it is specifically concluded that the pertinent bjections to the application, as noted in Paragraph 12 of the Findings as to the lot being too small for the structure and the argness being out of place in the subdivision, are not really elevant since a house with 2,025 square feet of living space and 1,350 square foot garage, for a total structure size of 3,375 quare feet, could, under existing ordinances and without a onditional use or variance, be constructed on the lot in question. 12. That it is concluded that since the Applicant desires o build 2,686 square feet of living space and have no garage, and since a residential structure, including living space and garage, of 3,375 feet could be constructed on the lot, that the variance is not so much directed to lot coverage but to the use of allowable garage space for living.space; that the size of the structure and lot coverage is not so much the issue but the actual use of the space contained in the total structure; that the variance is thus really a request to use what legally, ithout a variance, could be used for garage space to be used for living space and is really not a lot coverage issue. 13. That many homes in the City have had garages coverted into recreation rooms or extra living space; that such has not normally been associated with. convenience or profit but for necessity due to an expanding family or for just extra "leg room"; that if a family had a 2,025 square foot home and a 675 ry �, x ii r e��, •p 14 , �Y u "�-,7 tKgbSl a m. x..��:{: &qMi f nom* AMBROSE, FITZGERALD ICROOKSTON A8ome7ealld Counswom P.O. Bos 427 AONdlan, Idaho 83612 sphon@ 8884481 11. That it is specifically concluded that the pertinent bjections to the application, as noted in Paragraph 12 of the Findings as to the lot being too small for the structure and the argness being out of place in the subdivision, are not really elevant since a house with 2,025 square feet of living space and 1,350 square foot garage, for a total structure size of 3,375 quare feet, could, under existing ordinances and without a onditional use or variance, be constructed on the lot in question. 12. That it is concluded that since the Applicant desires o build 2,686 square feet of living space and have no garage, and since a residential structure, including living space and garage, of 3,375 feet could be constructed on the lot, that the variance is not so much directed to lot coverage but to the use of allowable garage space for living.space; that the size of the structure and lot coverage is not so much the issue but the actual use of the space contained in the total structure; that the variance is thus really a request to use what legally, ithout a variance, could be used for garage space to be used for living space and is really not a lot coverage issue. 13. That many homes in the City have had garages coverted into recreation rooms or extra living space; that such has not normally been associated with. convenience or profit but for necessity due to an expanding family or for just extra "leg room"; that if a family had a 2,025 square foot home and a 675 Yd as x ii r e��, •p 14 , re3. 0 3;U IWO "�-,7 tKgbSl m. x..��:{: &qMi AMSROSE, FITZGERALD 3CROOKSTON Attomeys and Counasbrs P.O. Box 427 derldien, Idaho 83642 ieDhons 88&4461 i foot garage on a 5,500 square foot lot and wanted to convert the garage to an additional bedroom or a recreational room, it is unlikely that adjacent home owners would object to such a conversion, at least there have been no such complaints come to the present City Council and such or similar conversions have occurred. 14. That while there may be a side benefit of profit, (economic gain or convenience to the Applicant, such may be the case in most if not all variances; that the real issue is using space that could be used for a garage as living space, and such is concluded not to be a significent economic issue. 15. That it is concluded that the objections to the Application were really based on the use of the structure as a shelter home and those objecting did not want elderly or handicapped people in their subdivision; that since a 3,375 foot structure could be built on the lot, objections to a 2,686 square foot structure are not concluded to be too significant, particularly in light of the legislative intent regarding shelter homes. 16. That regarding Section 11-2-419C it is specifically concluded as follows: a. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would clearly be unreasonable when a total structure of 3,375 square feet is allowed. b. That strict compliance with the requirements of AMBROSE, FITZGERALD iCROOKSTON Altomeys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Aerldlan, Idaho SM42 sphone 8864481 this Ordinance would result in extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because of unusual topography, other physical conditions or other conditions which are not self- inflicted; C* That the granting of the specified variance would not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situtatedz d. That such variance would not have the effect of altering the interest and purpose of this Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan or the legislative intent and purpose of Idaho Code 67-6530 through 67-6532. 17. That it is specifically concluded that this matter has been difficult to decide as it has put two reasonable and just goals at odds: one, a requirement that all single-famiy dwellings should be surrounded by open air and space to improve the standard of living of the occupants, and two, a reasonable social goal of integrating the elderly, mentally retarded and physically disabled into serene family residential surroundings and•live a "normal" life= that it is believed, however, that the latter goal should control particularly where the only real variance requested is to be able to use allowable "garage space" for living space and the motivation for the objection was based on the use of the property for a shelter home. 18. That it is concluded the Application should be granted provided the Applicant continues to meet the requirements of the Department of Health and Welfare for a shelter home as it is e e concluded their .determination as to whether he has shelter home license controls the City determination as to whether Section 67-6530 through 67-6532 apply to him and control the Zoning. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The City Council of the City of Meridian does hereby adopt and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL: Councilman Giesler Voted Councilman Myers Voted Councilman Tolsma Voted%qfq_ . Councilman Brewer Voted, Mayor Kingsford (Tie Breaker) Voted APPROVED:. 3 !Je2 DISAPPROVED: AMBROSE, FITZGERALD 3 CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridian, Idaho 83842 Telephone 888.4481 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL 0 • JULY 21. 198 Regular meeting of the Meridian city council called to order by Mayor Grant Kingsford at 7:30 p.m.: Members Present: Bill Brewer, Ron Tolsma, Bert Myers, Bob Giesler: Others Present: Dennis Clark, Roy Porter, Rob Prindle, Twayne Walker, Julie Stutts, Jackie Graham, Leonard Evans, Fred Fender, Gary Smith, Bob Mitich, Walt Morrow, Steve Wherry, Curt Crum, Mr. Tallman, Bill Nary, Members of Scout Troop # 129: The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Myers to approve the minutes of the previous meeting held July 7, 1987 as written. Motion Carried: All Yea: Mayor Kingsford: I would like to welcome the Member of Scout Troop # 129 who are in attendance at tonites meeting. I would like to.also publically .commend the Little League Baseball Team, the thirteen year olds, that are headed to the State Tournament in Coeur d"Alene, they were last years State Champions and placed seventh in the Western Region. ,Item #i: Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law on -Variance -Request by Robin Prindle: Mayor Kingsford; This is the Variance Request for lot coverage for the Retirement Home in Meadowview Subdivision, Are there any comments from the Council Members on the Findings? Giesler: After the Public Hearing, I did some research on this, we did have a lot of people in here at that time.who had some concern and after reading the -Findings I wanted.to"do some more research on this, the main issue, actually we have three issues that are talked about in the Findings, one of them is that.a Variance shall -not be granted for convenience or -profit, the.comments centered around the actual use of the property -rather than the actual problem -we do -have with the -35.% - lot coverage. Setting back and kind of reappraising that I look at the economic way -=the -economy -is in this area. I think.we have to start out by looking at what the State is doing', we see: the State spendingmillions of dollars,; --the Department -of Commerce, trying to promote growth in.our State. I think the Cities have to do the same. So regarding the 35% it has never came before us, so I tried to figure out some ways what is - wrong with the 35%, why do we have it in there. First I called Ada County and they do have the 35% Ordinance but it has never came before them to where they had to make a ruling on it. I talked to Boise City and they had the same thing but could arrive at a reason.why they had it so they did away with it. Talking with Nampa, they have the 35% coverage but it has never came up before them and Caldwell has a 35% lot coverage but they have never had to deal with it, but none of them could really shed any light on why this was in their Ordinance's except for uniformity and have enough grass for children who were around and that sort of thing..So we are trying to promote growth in our City and I think maybe we have.to do the same thing, I feel maybe that the 35% f MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JULY .211, 1987 PAGE # 2 lot coverage.is obsolete and out of date in this area, maybe we need to be competitive. During this time I met with the Chairman of the Planning & Zoning and give me some reasons why this 35% was in the Ordinance, he really could not come up with anything. This was discussed at their meeting last week and it was the concensus of the Commission that this needed to be amended. I feel that if we go ahead and approve this Variance we are setting a precedence, if that is the case so be it, lets go ahead and allow this shelter home to'be in this area, sae need to be:competitive with the other cities, I think this is something that would beneft.the City and also be good for some older people and not down grade the area it is going in and I really do not have a problem with it. One of the other things that was brought up during the Public Hearing and was of concern of many of the people was the use of the shelter -home, one of the things brought up was the older people needing their privacy and the children and the older people not being compatible, after looking into that we know that the State requires that this be allowed in a residential area, I feel that is one of the reasons that the older people will be in a residential area' where the children and the. younger people would be around them. The`State Department of Health & Welfare also has many programs they promote where the children go into these homes and visit with these older poeple that is how important they seem to feel that it is,and also a Nationwide- program that -is called Adopt a Grandparent that is televised and advertised, this is how important its is for the older people and younger people to be together. I really do not feel the older people are against having the younger people around. Getting back to the 35% lot coverage, if this Variance was to be approved of.course the other issue of the Ordinance we havesaying that a Variance cannot be granted for profit or convenience of course that would not come into effect then. I really feel we need this type of thing in our area and I really dis- agree with the Findings and I`would ask with these things -I have come up with,that Mr. Mayor and therestof the Council that we disagree with these Findings and that we have new Findings written.with a recommend- ation of approval. Myers: Mr. Giesler has some good points and has did some good research on this, however the thing it comes down to,.I have talked to several people and the..thing that concerns several people in that area is the size.of the home And'I Have to. agree. with them, it is going to dwarf the rest of the homes'in:-the neighborhood,.*as far as the shelter home at the public hearing -they were not really in favor of.the shelter home in their area. -I have no problem with the shelter home itself being there' -but `I do have a problem with the size of-, the_home in that area and according to -the -Ordinance a Variance should not be granted for profit or -convenience and that to me is important and I would say if Mr. Prindle wanted to go ahead'and build'the shelter home -in that area with the 35% coverage which would be approximately 600 square feet less then that would be the thing to do. I do not feel like just because he needs a larger home to make it more economically feasible that we ought to grant a Variance for it. Brewer: I have some comments -that I would like to make tonite regarding the Findings of Fact, really they do not pertain to this issue but for the public knowledge, the process is something the Legislature directs us to carry out. In situations like this proposal we must direct our legal counsel,to do the Findings and I am not finding fault with our City Attorney, I want people to know that but I do find fault with the 110 �f 44 0 T, k ffF Vil n r 'x r T a + 41 f s s •,v. ., S e fir$ + r ,F kce§ h�Wea�as�4 � n xyz : r k N x 14: x`ys # �� s ,01xfly,, ' MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL ® O JULY , 21, 1987 PAGE # 3 process itself, I believe we as elected officials hear the same facts and have access to the same codes as our City Attorney and I believe I can make those decisions without counsel's advise very often. The Findings and the Conclusions in the case of the Eagle Road Interchange Hearings and the Regional Mall Hearings for instance, they go over a period of time, I believe are worthy, but I feel many of these day to day operations that come before us, we should have the ability to be able to make these decisions without having to have our City Legal Representative do the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. One reason I feel that way is if our City Attorney is able to direct the vote in that manner we really do not need a Mayor & Council. I believe we as a City Council should have the right as to when we want to have Findings made and not be forced by Legislature to have them on every proposal like this. On the.Findings before us tonite.in.#9 of the Findings it shows that the applicants plans show that all setback requirements will be met, which means even though this particular home would be approximately 600 square feet larger than the normal home in that area it would meet our setback requirements, therefor I can't see where there would be any problem as.far as fire hazards or anything which causes us to have those requirements, then in #11 of the Findings that the public comments submitted were in opposition to the shelter home rather than the issue of the lot coverage which was the question before the Council. Under the Conclusions themselves in the document under #2 it state -the City has the authority to grant Variances and in #4 it state the Council may.take judicial notice of_its own proceedings, those of the Commission, governmental statutes, ordinances and policies and of actual conditions existing within the City.& the.fitate. That parag- raph, just to me goes on to state that we as the governing Council have the right to grant Variances from our codes. In conclusion.I believe in this project, I see it as a positive addition to the subdivision in question and possibility instead of a well maintained facility on.this same lot a home could well be built for a family of eight, who have three junk cars and an unkept yard full of trash, where this -facility. would be a well maintained structure and an assetto the subdivision. These are pioneers of our community and I believe we should have shelter homes so they.can stay here in the Meridian area where their family & friends can visit them occasionally. Tolsma: Basically. I echo Mr,. Brewer's. -comments, I read through -the _ Findings, I had negative thoughts on'this mntil I spent several -hours the last few�days_tgoing over some: of this and :seeing - the- lot. and seeing the people and generally looking.at'other shelter homes, where they --- were located and how they were.kept up and the only drawback.that I can see is like Mr. Myers said is the building is about--twice--as-large as the other:homes in that area, but where there is no garage on the unit it is really not going to be-as-much_out of.place and like was mentioned there could be a family with eight children build on this lot and there would probably be a lot more hardship on the neighbor- hood than there would with eight elderly people living there. I went through the Findings and the testimony we had at the public hearing and really the only question we had was that it was going to be a shelter home and not on the 35% lot coverage. Myers: I just want to make one thing clear, I am not against a shelter home and I am not against -growth or development, I just feel in this case that the Ordinance is such that we should stick by it. Mainly with MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JULY .21, 1987 PAGE # 0 the Variance the larger home would dominate that area plus it is more for an economic gain, I feel which is not what the Variance is for. Mayor Kingsford: This first issue is to approve the Findings of Fact, is there a Motion to that effect? The Motion was made by Myers to approve the Findings of Fact, Motion died for lack of a second. The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Tolsma that the Findings of Fact be disapproved: Motion Carried: 13rewer, Yea: Tolsma, Yea: Giesler, Yea.: Myers, Nay: The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Giesler to have the City Attorney re -address this issue and prepare new Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Motion Carried: Brewer, Yea: Tolsma; Yea: Giesler: Myers, Nay: --- Brewer: We might request to, that while our City Attorney is going about this that he spend some time with our gommissioners, Walt Morrow and his group, find out their position on changing this 35% lot coverage. Mayor Kingsford: I might in lieu . of that -pass -on, Mr. Morrow, .I..think there.-.is:'_some--real-merit, we have discussed it before, I think there is some real merit in having lot coverage, especially*.in-a R -4 -Zone and I hope it would not be abandoned post haste, I would hope that your Commission would give some good consideration to it as you do everything. Item #2: Curt Crum: Ada County Juvenile Center: Crum: Approximately- a year ago the Juvenile Center -opened a-satelite office here in Meridian' through' the benevolence of a businessman- here- in town who had . some property and -we - opened a. probation- of f ice here to be more accessible to the public, we felt to be more responsible to the community and -to the county because we did have fair amount of juveniles on probation in this area. What has happened in the last year we were able to fund that operation_ through a grant as of ;.recent we have found but that our funding for the next year has: 'not- been .- approved by the County Commissioners, it leaves us in a precarious position wanting -to continue on with that office -or an office here in Meridian, the problem is we do not have any budget to continue the services or an office that we would -like or are appropriate.- In light of that we would ask if there would-.be.any_consideration to using . either the office of this present building once it'_is vacated see if there could be some office space available here and whatever -agreement could be reached to take care of the utilities and such to make it useable, I might note that we really do not know what the City Council's intention is for this building., but we would just like to propose that as an option if.possible and explore it futher if.need be. Mayor Kingsford: I might direct you to make,a written proposal to the Council, they are entertaining several different options for this -build- ing and certainly we would look at your proposal. BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN APPLICATION OF ROBIN PRINDLE FOR A VARIANCE AT 1081 FAIRWOOD COURT The above entitled variance request having come on for consideration on July 7, 1987, at approximately 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 728 Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the City Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony, the City Council of the City of Meridian makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of the public hearing on the variance was published for two consecutive weeks prior to the scheduled hearing for July 7, 1987, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the July 7, 1987 hearing; that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That the notice of public hearing is required to be sent to property owners within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the land being considered pursuant to 11-2-416 E and 11-2-419 D of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that this requirement has been met. 3. That the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, 11-9-606 AMBROSE, B, 11-2-410A, Zoning Schedule of Bulk and Coverage require in the FITZGERALD & CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Boz 427 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Telephone 888401 AMBROSE, FITZGERALD & CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridien, Idaho 63642 Telephone 8884481 U R-4, Residential District# that no more than 35% of the lot can be covered with a residential structure; that this Ordinance provision was passed April 2, 1984, as part of the new Zoning Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that under the old zoning ordinances there was no such restriction. 4. That the Applicant has requested that he not be limited to 35% lot coverage; Applicant has requested to be allowed to construct a 2,686 square foot single family dwelling when the 35% rule would allow only 2,025 square feet. 5. The size of the lot in question is 55 x 100 or 5,500 square feet. 6. That the subdivision within which the lot is contained wa approved prior to the adoption of 11-2-410A. 7. That the lot is zoned R-4 Residential which thus can only be used for single family dwellings. 8. That the use to which the Applicant proposes to put the lot to is a shelter home which, is licensed and regulated by the Department of Health and Welfare; the home is to be constructed to house eight people; that for purposes of this Application it is assumed that the Applicant is proceeding to obtain a home shelter care license from the State of Idaho Department of Health & Welfare such that the provisions of 67-6530 through 67-6532, Idaho Code, apply to the zoning; that there was no evidence presented by the Applicant that the residents would be mentally or physically handicapped as re:ferrenced in those code sections. AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attomeye and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridian, Idaho 83842 Telephone 8884481 • • 9. That the plans show that all set back requirements of 11-2-410A will be met.granting of the variance. 10. That the Applicant set forth the following pertinent comments as his reasons for justification of the variance the following that in order for the ,project to be economical to him he had to have eight residents in the shelter home and in order to have eight residents he needed to have 2,686 square feet; that the structure would comply with the set back requirements of the R-4 zone; that there would be no additional traffic; that there would be no additional noise; that the home was designed to fit on the lot; that the backyard would be fenced; the Applicant submittedd no other testimony or evidence for the requirements set forth in 11-2-419 for the granting of a variance. 11. That there was public comment submitted in opposition to the variance; that most of the comments centered around the use of a shelter home rather than the question before the Council of a variance to the 35% lot coverage requirement; that the comments in opposition to the variance that were pertinent are as follows: the lot was too small for the structure; the largeness of the structure was out -of -place in relation to the smaller size homes in the area; that there was a 35% maximum lot coverage in the zone, R-4; and that such a facility would increase traffic in the area which would be detrimental to the many children in he area which play in the street. 12. That the Application shows the Applicant entered into a AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridien, Idaho 83842 Telephone 8884461 PJ contract to purchase the lot in question on February 19, 1987; that the Applicant did, thus, not own the lot prior to the adoption of the 35% requirement. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City has authority to grant variances pursuant to Section 11-2-419 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. That the City Council has judged this application by the guidelines, standards, criteria, and policies contained in the Zoning Ordinance and upon the record submitted to it and the things upon which it may take judicial notice. 4. That the Council may take judicial notice of its own proceedings, those of the Commission, governmental statutes, ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and the State. 5. That the following provisions of the Zoning Ordinance not relating to Variances are pertinent to this Application: 2-405 A INTERPRETATION 1. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: The provisions herein shall be held to be the minimum requirements for the promotion of the public health, safety, morals and welfare. AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attorneys and Couneelors P.O. Box 427 Meridian, Idaho 63842 Telephone 8883481 11 • 2. RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER LAWS: Where the conditions imposed by any provision herein upon the use of land or buildings or upon the bulk of buildings are either more restrictive or less restrictive than comparable conditions imposed by any other provisions herein or any other law, ordinance, resolution, rule or regulation of any kind, the regulations which are more restrictive or which imposed higher standards or requirements shall govern. 2-405 C USE AND BULK REGULATIONS 1. USE: A building, structure or land shall hereafter be used or occupied, and a building or part thereof, or other structure, shall be erected, raised, moved, re- constructed, extended, enlarged or altered only as in conformity with the regulations herein specified for the district in which it is located. Exceptions to the use and bulk regulations of this Ordinance shall be only by Conditional Use. 2. BULK: All new buildings and structures shall conform to the regulations established herein for the district in which each building shall be located except as other wise permiteed in this Ordinance by Conditional Use. 2-406 C SINGLE NON -CONFORMING LOTS OF RECORD In any district in which single-family dwellings are permitted,.a single-family dwelling and customary accessory buildings may be erected on any single lot of record (see definition of lot of record) at the effective date of adoption or amendment of this Ordinance, notwithstanding limitations imposed by other provisions of thig�jordinance. Such lot must be in separate ownership and not of continuous frontage with other lots in the same ownership. This provision shall apply even though such lot fails to meet the requirements for area or width, or both, that are generally applicable in the district, provided that yard dimensions and requirements other than those applying to area or width, or both, of the lot shall conform to the regulations for the district in which such lot is located. 6. That the above section 2-406 C is interpretted to mean AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridian, Idaho 83842 Telephone 8854481 • that an existing lot; of record need not comply with the area and width requirements of the Zoning Ordinance but must comply with "yard dimensions and requirements other than those applying to area or width, or both," which thusly means compliance with lot coverage restrictions. 7. That the following provisions of Section 11-2-419, Variances, of the Zoning Ordinance is noted which is pertinent to the Appliation: 11-2-419 A GENERAL The Council may authorize in specific cases a variance from the terms of this Ordinance as will not be contrary to the public interest where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this. Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. No non -conforming use of neighboring land, structures or buildings in the same district and no permited or non- conforming use of lands, structures or buildings in other districts shall be considered grounds for issuance of a variance. Variances shall not be granted on the grounds of convenience or profit, but only where strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. A variance application does not go to the Commission unless directed by the Council. 8. That the specific requirements regarding a variance taht must be evidenced and found by the City Council are as Ifollows: 11-2-419 C FINDINGS A variance shall not be granted unless (as a result of a public hearing) the Council makes a statement of supportive reasons based directly on the evidence presented to it which supports conclusions that the mentioned standards and conditions of this Ordinance have been met by the applicant and unless all of the I AMBROSE, FITZGERALD & CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridian, Idaho INW2 Telephone 8884481 following exist: 1. That there are such special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would clearly be impracticable or unreasonable; 2. That strict compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance would result in extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because of unusual topography, other physical conditions or other conditions which are not self-inflicted, or that these conditions will result in inhibiting the achievements or the objectives of this Ordinance. 3. That the granting of the specified variance will not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated. 4. That such variance will not have the effect of altering the interest and purpose of this Ordinance and the Meridian comprehensive Plan. 9, That it is specifically concluded that the major reason for the requsted variance is to be allowed to build an eight resident shelter home rather than a smaller one so that the project would be economically feasible; that Section 11-2-419 states that, "Variances shall not be granted on the grounds of convenience or profit, but only where strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship." The Applicant did not set forth any hardship created by the 35% limitation other than one of profit and economics and conveniences. It is specifically noted that the Applicant purchased or entered into the contract for purchase of the lot in AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridien, Idaho 83842 Telephone 888-"" 0 • question after the 35% lot coverage was adopted and it must be concluded that he therefore had constructive knowledge of the limitation. 10. The Applicant submitted no evidence of special conditions and circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot which are not applicable to the other lots in the district; or that a literal interpretation of the 35% limitation deprived the Applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of the zoning ordinance; or that the granting of the variance would not confer on the Applicant a special privilege that is denied by the zoning ordinances to lots in the same zone. 11. That the provisions of Idaho Code, Sections 67-6530, 67-6531 and 67-6532, are noted in that a shelter home is treated as a single family dwelling; that Section 67-6532 (c) states "No local ordinances or local restrictions shall be applied to or required for a residential facility which serves eight (8) or fewer mentally and/or physically handicapped persons and is supervised as required in Section 67-6531, Idaho Code, which is not applied to or required for a single family dwelling in the same zone"; that it is concluded that had there been no 35% limitation the Applicant could have constructed the shelter home on the lot in question, without requesting a variance, and by merely obtaining a building permit; that the 35% limitation does apply and is evenly applied to the R-4 zone and no provisions in AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Merldlan, Idaho 83842 Telephone 8884481 r� u r� u Idaho Code, Sections 67-6530 - 67-6532 prohibit the restiction. 12. That it is concluded that the comments in objection to the variance other than as noted in Paragraph 11 of the Findings, were irrelevant to the issue and were not a basis of denying the Application. 13. That it is specifically concluded that the 35% maximum lot coverage is reasonable in the R-4 zone. 14. That regarding Section 11-2-419C it is specifically concluded as follows: a. That there are no special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would clearly be impracticable or unreasonable; b. That strict compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance would not result in extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because of unusual topography, other physical conditions or other conditions which are not self- inflicted; C. That the granting of the specified variance would not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situtated;' d. That such variance would have the effect of altering the interest and purpose of this Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 15. That it is specifically concluded that this matter has been difficult to decide as it has put two reasonable and just goals at odds: one, a reasonable requirement that all single-famiy dwellings should be surrounded by open air and space • 0 to improve the standard of living of the occupants which has been uniformly enforced since the adoption of the Zoning Ordinances, and two, a reasonable social goal of integrating the elderly, mentally retarded and physically retarded into serene family residential surroundings and live a "normal" life; that it is believed, however, that since no hardship not created by the Applicant was evidenced and only convenience and profit evidenced and since the 35% limitation is a part of the Ordinance, which is a reasonable requirement, and it is better to not grant unjustified variances even for landable purposes, that the 35% limitation must be upheld. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The City Council of the City of Meridian does hereby adopt and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL: (APPROVED: AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridien, Idaho 83842 Telephone 888.4481 Councilman Giesler Voted_! Councilman Myers Voted__ Councilman Tolsma Voted Councilman Brewer Voted Mayor Kingsford (Tie Breaker) Voted DISAPPROVED: • ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY IS'TRIC'T 318 EAST 37TH STREET BOISE, IDAHO 83714 0 Inter -Department Correspondence To: Ada County Highway District Commission Date: 6-29-87 From: Development Services Subject: MERIDIAN VARIANCE 1081 FAIRWOOD (Robin Prindle, 888-1244) FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. This is a variance from bulk and coverage controls to allow coverage of 49% of Lot rather than 35%. 2. The site plan indicates the proposed building will be used as a shelter home. ® 3. Fairwood Court has 50 -feet of right-of-way (which is adequate) and is fully improved. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1. Any work within AND right-of-way requires a permit. For information regarding the requirements to obtain a permit, please contact Quality Control at 344-6111, extension 430. CU, DR, or PDC file number required. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: 1. Requirements are made to Meridian Planning & Zoning as condition for compliance. SIGNATURE OF STAFF SUBMITTING: Jon D. Thompson • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JULY Regular Meeting of the Meridian City Council called to order by Mayor Grant Kingsford at 7:30 p.m.: Members Present: Bill Brewer, Ron Tolsma, Bert Myers, Bob Giesler: Others Present: Roy Porter, Gary Smith, Walt Morrow, Wayne Crookston Bob Wherry, Miriam Barr, Vickie Peugh, Kathleen Kirsch, Gale Taylor, Teresa Carroll, Phil Carroll, Robin Prindle, )Irwayne Walker, Dale Ryan, Glennie Sleight. The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Tolsma to approve the minutes of the previous meeting held June 16, 1987 as written: Motion Carried: All Yea: Item #1: Public Hearing: Meridian.Senior Citizens Community Block Grant: Mayor Kingsford, we held a hearing on this application in March for a preliminary application and that has been approved and now a second Public Hearing has to be held for the final Grant application, the Seniors are asking for a Grant in the amount of $5,000.00 for which they have the matching funds. I.will now open the Public Hearing, is there anyone in the audience who.wishes to offer testimony on this request for a Idaho Community Development Block Grant? There was no response, the Public Hearing was closed. The Motion was made by Myers and seconded -by Tolsma that the final application be approved'_. and submitted, for, .an.Idaho Community Develop- ment Block Grant fortheMeridian Senior Citizens in the amount of $10,000.00 of which $5,000.00 will be matching funds by the Meridian Senior Citizens. Motion Carried: All Yea: Item. #2: Public Hearing: Variance Request by Robin Prindle: Mayor Kingsford, this Variance: request for -a,Shelter-Home in-Meadowview - Subdivision #2,' this concern the area of 'lot covered' by the home.;. I ' will now open the Public Hearing, is there anyone from the audience who - wishes to offer testimony on this request? Vickie Puegh, 1012 Fairwood Court, Puegh was sworn by the City Attorney. Puegh, as a representative of.my family, myself and the homeowners residing on Fairwood Court culdesac and the outlaying homes concerned, we would like you, the Meridian City Council, to consider our petition and comments concerning the application of Mr. Robin Prindle for a Variance to build a 2686 sq. ft. shelter home for the elderly in our sudivision. We the resident homeowners, the majority being young -married - couples with small children, feel that this small lot and the location of it is inappropriate for this unit. We feel a larger -more suitable location should be sought and utilized. The homes in our subdivision MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JULY 7, 1987 PAGE # 2 are all single family dwellings, the majority being 1300 sq. ft or less. Under section 11-2-410A zoning schedule of bulk coverage controls of the zoning Ordinance of the City of Meridian, it is required that the maximum portion of a lot that can be used to construct a structure on, in a R-& residential district is 35%. Mr. Robin Prindle requests to be allowed to use 490 of the lot. Under Article II, Section I in the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Meadow View #2, Subdiv_ ison the use of any lot for multi -family dwelling units is prohibited. We urge the Meridian City Council to deny this application for a Variance by Mr. Robin Prindle to build on,said lot. Puegh submitted a petition containing 49 signatures asking this be prohibited. (PETITION ON FILE WITH THESE MINUTES.) Kathleen Kirsh, 1112 Fairwood Court, Kirsh was sworn by the City Attorney. Kirsh: I live diagonally across from the proposed site, we are the senior citizens of the court and I would hate to see this dwelling be built for the.simple reason that there are so many little children in that area. I think all the children would create a problem for the proposed residents of -this building. Gail Taylor, 1053 Fairwood Court, Taylor was sworn by the City Attorney. Taylor: I am concerned about the traffic this will create, there are several small children in this area, and they are going to bring an excess of vans in to our culdesac, they will have commuter vans using the culdesac to turn around in. Robin Prindle, 445 Clear Creek Drive, Prindle was sworn by the City Attorney. Prindle: Some of.the-comments..that have -been -made is there will be a lot of excess traffic,-the,residents.of._this home :do not --drive, they are people who are;in their:=�eighties;.they are,people_who can,.}ust get around, you •will -not• have noise at all, most ._of them do not - go outside. The home is designed -to fit on the lot., it will be an attractive home, it will be well landscaped,�have.sprinkler,systems' will -be well kept, Teresa Carroll: -who will take care,of-the residents? Prindle: We have 7amanager-who will -be on site.24 hours:a day; she watches them 24'hours-a day, -these people'can basically -take care of themselves, what a shelter -,home: s'is between retirement people and people who need togointo a -nursing home. They, can get'around but they can not' -drive, they do not play loud music, but they like to hear the sounds of a neighborhood, that is why we are putting this in. That is why most of the shelter homes are in a residential neighborhood. Mayor Kingsford: Mr. Prindle,.if I might ask you a question, this is the same type of home as I have over in my neighborhood? Prindle: Yes, I have brought a set.of.plans if anyone would like to look at them, to give an idea what the home would look like, how it will be landscaped, it will have trees, a burm in front, it will have parking on site for two units which really is not needed. The only traffic you would be talking about would be going to the store, we r ��� k AXI • MER,IDIAN CITY COUNCIL • • JULY 7, 1987 PAGE # 3 will only go to the store once a month. Taylor: Will they stay -in the house all day? Prindle: more than likey, I have.been to about twenty of these while we were looking into it and I have never seen anybody outside. Most of the residents sit and watch TV or read. They do not need the care of a nursing home, we are trying to keep the cost down for them, the cost is about half that of a nursing home. There is only eight people in this home. Carroll: we live directly behind this3anid we have three samll children what about the back yard? Prindle: We are completely fencing the back yard and there will be trees back there. Mayor Kingsford: If I may offer a couple of comments, the State totally forbids us under'zoning to stop this usage, there is no way a City could stop them from placing this in a.residential neighborhood which part of the comments' were directed to that, you do not think it is an appropriate place for this type-of-unit,..State Code overrides any City Ordinances in this case, the only thing we have any control over under our current Ordinances although they were not in effect when this subdivision was approved, our current Ordinance says you can not build over 35% of the lot so that is really what is the issue here tonite. The other thing I might mention is that Sagehurst.is over in my niegborhood and I had some of those same kind of reservations when they started building, it looks like a -large house and it -is well landscaped, and Mr. Prindle is correct you do not see those people, once in a while they might come with family in and out but most of•.the time you never see them. There was additional discussion ,on- the differerit aspects- of this home. Phil Carroll: How high of.a fence will there be? Mayor Kingsford: It will-meet-City:.Code, probably six in the back and down to three in the front. Prindle: that is correct. Mayor.Kingsford: is there anyone -else from--the-audience who wishes to testify on this-matter?`There was.no.response,.the-Public Hearing was closed. Are there any questions or comments from the Council? Brewer: I have some comments, I am one of the local Morticians here in Meridian and down through the years I have had an opportunity to go in and out of these type homes, I think there is a misconception here as to what this home is all about by you people and I forgive you for it you are almost treating it as if these old people have a disease or something and really the only disease thay have is they find themselves being older people, who either do not have family at home to take care of . them or__they _are_ not-old-ienough or-- sick - enough - to- land in a nursing home. The reason State Codes are written the way they are is so that these home will land in neighborhood areas. That is where these people still belong. I have even knofxh of instances where the children in the MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL • JULY 7, 1987 PAGE # 4 make a point of dropping by these shelter homes every day, no one loves children more than older people, I have seen birthday parties held in them where the young people come in to the parties for the older people, they love to have them around, they are out occasionally, particularly' in nicer weather, there is generally a sun porch or patio in back where they can go out and spend some time but there is a very strong pointed reason why they are out in a neighborhood such as yours,•I really believe given the chance and like the Mayor has already stated we really have any right or ability to stop this but if it does occur, I would about bet you would come back here in a year and admit.it is fitting very,very appropriate in your neighborhood, I really believe you are coming about this not knowing what a shelter home is all about. Giesler: I think Mr. Brewer covered thing pretty well. Mayor Kingsford: Mr. Prindle, what was the square footage you could build on that lot under our Ordinance Prindle: Two thousand twenty five: Mayor Kingsford: So:, for the record what they could do without ever stopping by except for a building permit would build the two thousand twenty five square foot building.: So in regards to the petition they can build to that square footage without any special permits or.requir- ements. So at issue is whether we grant them a Variance to go the add- itional 600 square feet. Brewer: I do admire your neighborhood spirit, I would not ever let go of that either, you have shown a lot of. congeniality between your neigh- bors, your sticking together, that is healthy, I just think it is guided wrong this time. The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Giesler_to _rave -the -City• - Attorney prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of -Law on the request for a Variance by Robin Prindle. Motion Carried: All -Yea:- - Item #3: Pre-Termination.Hearing: Water/Sewer/Trash Delinquencies: Mayor Kingsford: You have been informed in writing, if you -choose to-, - - you have the - right to . a pre -termination hearing before the -Mayor & : City Council to appear in person to be judged on facts and defend the claim - made by the City that your, water, sewer and trash bill 4s -delinquent.- --; You may retain Counsel. Is there anyone in the audience who wishes a pre -termination hearing? There was no response. Due,,to their failure to pay their water bill or to present any valid reason why the bill has not been paid, their water shall be turned off on July 15, 1987. In order to have their water turned back on there will be an additional fee of $10.00. There hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho Code: Even though they appeal their water will be shut off. The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Brewer to approve the turn- off list: Motion Carried: All Yea: tT PETITION TO PROHIBIT YHE BUILDING OF A 2586 SQ. FT. STRUCTURE ON— LOT 22, BLOCK 12 MEADOWVIEW SUB -DIVISION NO. 2, MERIDIAN, IDAHO. Said structure is foi the purpose of a multi -family shelter for the elderly.(See attached information) NAME I ADDRESS I PHONE �0/A506-00A08 u r 1 r� �.,, hcu'p� � c� Lo I 1 3 t C." t j 17 11-d I .7 I �' -��► !1 r' if� R. `5,' -3 -S S la I !,t t IC/ j-- is 1 _ _ _ �0 A r(� i � Vie_• �i � � ��. � ,.r, -�.(, 1• r I' �' �' � �_? ��' \ /' 1 � ' ` U �� � „r - Vii, / -. t � L � _� � ���-� 'lam- L ..? � .-� j �� LL� L l / -i �=,ice•._-�_ � rl I �/ -06 I of - 2t rc�- /ACU-'+ // rk . j -1. C -->I I-) o/�r - �'`y�k1 q �®lam . j -1. C -->I I-) o/�r - �'`y�k1 q lvl- 4A /Vz/ 'XI tT My name is Vickie Peugh. As a representative to my family, myself, the homeowners residing on Fairwood Ct. culdesac and the outlying homes concerned, we would like you, the Meridian City Council, to consider our petition and comments concerning the application of Mr. Robin Prindle for a variance to build a 2686 sq, ft. shelter home for the Elderly in our sub -division. We the resident homeowners, the majority being young married couples with small children, feel that this small lot and the location of it is inappropriate for this unit. We feel a larger more suitable location should be sought and utilized. The homes in our sub- division are all single family dwellings, the majority being 1300 sq. ft. or less. _01Ho3s , �f t ;'.2c�n m sird ance csf the City of Mer dean, n �t i onditzons and rest ractions fciz .Mea3Ipsr View Azo 2.ub-D�v� Sion, .�.,.�_ i—I ,o . �E$of—zst '%"Tiir3 -. ami3y w+e sng uni s is prohibit? �_._WOu urge fh.e Meridian iti� ;ouncil to en its application �--:- = a variance 11y Mr. RoZ�in;. Pndle to buildon{ said lot STATE 01F 'iDAH0 D E'PARTM1ENT OF HEALTH H AND W E11FAR E _ DIVISION OF HEALTH, STATEHOUSE, BOISE, IDAHO 83720-9990 April 20, 1987 Rob Prindle Prindle Construction 445 Clear Creek Drive Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Mr. Prindle: Re: Proposed Meridian Shelter Home The drawings received in this office on April 14, 1987, for the above - referenced project have been reviewed. Based upon our review, the following comments are made: 1. The ramp shown on sheet no. 1 needs to slope 12 feet for each 1 foot in drop (i.e., 1:12). 2. Except for the eiectric4l4 palnel, no electrical layout is shown --on---- the drawings (i.e., outlets, lights, fans, switches, etc.). - -' -' Vz 3. No smoke detectors are shown on the drawings. At 4 minimum, 4 detectors are required (1 on the ceiling in each hallway: the locations of the fire -extinguishers kid 1 on"th'e ceiling in,., , the main living room. The detectors must be electrically interconnected so that if one°activates, they`a 1 sound an alarm.) $ 4. 5. 6. Forced ventilation to the outsjde;,needs to be'provided in the main bathroom and in,each..sletping room toilet area. All po'rtabld-fire extinguishers need to be multipurpose ABC type, ;miriimum'rating.of 2A20BC each. Recommend commercial grade .ext-ilftguishers . Thewindow in sleeping room no. 2/3 needs to be increased in size. Window space needs to be at least 1/8th-of the floor area. In this case, a minimum of 20 square feet of window space is required. 7. All sleeping room windows should be installed so that the maximum sill height above the finished floor is not over 36". A sill height of 36" makes viewing to the outside from a sitting position much easier, and a 36" sill height would be an advantage EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Rob Prindle April 20, 1987 Page 2 should the elderly have to escape through the window in an emergency. The above are the extent of our comments at this time and are based solely upon the drawings submitted. Should you have any questions, please call or write this office. Sincerely, Roger W. Gehrke Health Facility Safety and Construction Specialist Licensing and Certification Facility Standards Program RWG/hg/F7 cc: Loyal I. Perry John Hathaway 0 I CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMEN• ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION 1455 North Orchard Boise, Idaho 83706 REVIEW SHEET Rezone # Conditional Use # Preliminary/Final/Short Plat We have no objections to this proposal. r'Q; rwu 'A C-A Return to: Boise Eagle _ Meridian Kuna ACZ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. 3. _ Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal. 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. 5. _ We will require more data concerning the depth of (high seasonal ground water)(solid lava) from original grade before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal. 6. _ We can approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located (2,4) feet above solid lava layers. 7. We can approve this proposal for: Central sewage Interim sewage Individual sewage _ Community sewage system and Central water Individual water _ Community water well. 8. Plans for _Central sewage __Community sewage system Sewage dry lines, and Central water _Community water must be submitted to and approved by the Regional Health and Welfare Environmental Services Field Office. 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 10. _ This depart=ment would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. 11. _ If restroom facilities are to be installed then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. 12. _ We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any (food establishment)(beverage esrt�ablishment)(swimning pools or spas)(grocery store). I ]_ 13. I— ae I m e 4 le S GL �e cam, l kr s +- Reviewed by U Date N 41 cc N H E-1 N V W � a xb z N m U 3. O IkxA 44 WWa O 2 ,� U H dP Fa•I a � a 0, w $4 4.=)o a H o o c� tw . H P+ W W H �U U o a a °w o N N A � O H a °a a w 4 o a A .. N am -.ml. so 0 na n m c4 m b+ �a �b cog o o �ba m O WW 0 m 04 �a Aa �- 3 N t� ti a M O o► V 3 O W O • t- H C N :CDH U 0 A m ti a) E u O Y Vi E fa 4.1 . 3 - 4 ti -rel ti H O p c7 a N E•) x o N N A � O H a °a a w 4 o a A .. N am -.ml. so 0 na n m c4 m b+ �a �b cog o o �ba m O WW 0 m 04 �a Aa �- 3 N t� ti 3 O W O N .,a cd w° & tT ri 0 A m ti a) E u O b a Vi E fa 4.1 . 3 - 4 ti -rel ti H O p c7 a o N N A � O H a °a a w 4 o a A .. N am -.ml. so 0 na n m c4 m b+ �a �b cog o o �ba m O WW 0 m 04 �a Aa �- 3 N t� ti W W C A 4>7 O W >1 H U �\ri r4 V >q3 0 a OrI4J m O �J W (d rI -H rI rt rO ca -r4 to -rl ani O . Crl w v En w- 9 +�I 41 W A H U ri U a) LaN a) -rl41 �+ A 4 O A V wk O O �-► -(a t) W JJ O .O -r1 N F. .-I rO N N -rl -- m -'i 4.1 }J -4 -rl - a) C a) m 4 ;J r -I (dp ri a k td rO 3 )-1 ;J O A (d b tT Orl a; U) d x �}I O a7 G+ 9 C -:a-1 A w ?� 0 O -rl Qa 0 W N +J C C tT -,i -.i 44 3 03 +J H 4J W (d a) Z )4 C C O O to N ;J W >r O - 4 -4t7► H � -14 O U-4 O C O O JJ a) -C N x m 11 -rl )a ri -.i a b N 4 - C 0 O C 01 rO W $4 () O ri a) v U] a) a) ,C • .4 $4 UI LL ?4 -r4 -rl -rl H a)aa 4J k P+ > (d JJ %D $4 3 .-I a U }J ;J b O C p W 3 C :3 (d m (n a) >, a) >, wa.J Q w -rl W $4 +J 9 a) a) O C O O a) .0 tP a) 00 $ ra3 -rI +J •r4 0) A a) cn (a 3 �J Q -rl O r I b x 4 C rA O >, .0 v m -r) iJ O U "1 v4 U r-1 • LL 1.1 I a) (d S ;J a) 3 Cn 4i Sd r -I A a) - 4 >r ri >, -� W � � c 4) (d N CCS 5 (V -4 •rl O 0 )-I A O )i -.i ri $4 (d }}� rd 41 4 k b to C 5 0 fd v ;J '00 A A >. C... rO b H ra w w as w w O a c� w -rl v a) E a) b a b a a) v z a) m C *--Z� aJ ro ri a --4 N � r $4 •• C r1 U 'O i v F U U C4 43 F •• --k r,ry f i "i ` k 7 � I ol � 1 • fl. U: k+ D r ro « +« t > b 3 n t3] G7 ro hn W W W W W G7 3 H 4 C, i a a m CD F•• O H. O K O W m K O O F, W 'I a x� rt F_ A r a a �i K rt r K V O tT w K O m 5 0 0 rt p) o W a m .•r ft N• r l< '< P. m n W ft pi U, o f rt 5 r 1' P, K ro () a s n m A N rt � 0 En C4 ° K� m�' :' o rla " a, W N G 'p'�' rt a En m m rt cn m 4 `c p' ry� w N m � � OD m t0 � m O C O O in tD ] rt h W b Wrt Mm m H R+ m �t m 0 L.) m P G o £ ti t7 o rt O Q rt rt n C % K O O u. n rt Wm a m m H H- N• r• `< MI U) K o' o' to W a m O tj P) m K K a m 0 O n 0 K K K to to p K O p tv a o P. �- K H. rt W x w :�m rt g M w S N O 0 O O w �' K w rt O L=J a0 � K� m w 10 rt H rnt m $ M ~ �r a to K••• r• K O p fh d O rt m ro O K x n &< F+• F, m LQ K m — Hi O I'• m W n to mK mR'Ww awm P- rt rt N— f- N " ID :71rtod n OR rt o tirt til LQ O R' piF�+ N rt : H n rt Gzi v: 1-a P) In cat rt N•a '• O H ort l � m rt C K w '�< rt Prl 7d r •�• Cl H U C4 m "4^ tri �•` `/ H 00 N s$ 1-3 v '`r 171 N cc p 0 0 H r z�E�•�z p, rt rt co O rt El LA n m m rt P. o 'd rr N b W0*1F, m A O O m O b �' F+• Gi y rt tra Watom a Ob m 0f1M H tnOrt ®rt K OCrJa z O m m o �t o w m ao 1 w b ri rt m P3 rt o n v m(D �� CEJ hJ b ro C H F4 m rt p p W D m 0 0 w :hM H w H a a, w to a. A O m N 47 G1 C 'Z' H W w to w d w O p o. K .. W tz m p H 1-hy. m H n rt H o rt hi a •• til a K o o m K H ? 1 N OD W ,1a x G to tl ti W 11 mb M O O to zF-' W oo m rn W H w p' H CD w waE�iw H. �rt � N Cia z • m rt rt rn r• m rt cn K w H O O O i- p m o p o ~ w m H wE m y ° p H m 0 o 0 •• n m t� d N•a rt r b p N H z a3 N. n rt W En Fa- cnb ran rt ~ rt 0 H M w r to o 0W m H 0 ',d H rt G rDoo�art ~ N H cn a Krt alK o' O m F x Z W. EnPm) rwn p' N ' M � m N rt • 0 ALEXANDFR, Nolan Derk & iina R. MARSHAW, Richard A. & Lee Sherry 10!! Fairwood X092 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 21 Block 12 Lot 32 Block 12 TILIN, Mary H. KIRSCH, Robert & Kathleen T. 1111 Fairwood112 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 20 Block 12 Lot 33 Block 12 BASURA, Lynn P. HEFNER, Sharon K. 2252 NW 11th Ave. 1142 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 18 Block 12 Lot 34 Block 12 BRADSHAW, Larry E. & Susan L. NEISEN, Randolph A. & LeAnn M. 1077 Fairwood Ct. 122 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 ;.A Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 23 Block 12 Lot-16 Block 12 TAYLOR, Robert Mike & Gail ROWELL, Daniel E. & Shelly J. 1053 Fairwood 2222 NW 11th Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 24 Block 12 :..� Lot 17 Block 12 JENKINS, Keith B. vd4A 9� CARROLL, Phillip R. &Theresa M. P.O.Box 5597 to1080 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 26 Block 12 - Lot 14 Block 12 PEUGH, Clayton H. & Vickie D. 1012 Fairwood Ct. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 27 Block 12 BROOKS, Monte E. & Gaye A. 1034 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 28 Block 12 GAROUTTE, Greg & Rita 1054 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 29 Block 12 BROWNING, Wallace III & Sheila 1078 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 30 Block 12 SECRETARY OF HOUSING & URBAN DEV. P.O.Box 42 Boise, Idaho 83704 Lot 31 Block 12 OUGHTY, Ronald Steven & Carol 1074 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 13 Block 12 ORALES, Raul 1052 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 12 Block 12 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN Pursuant to Sections 11-2-419D and 11-2-416, of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing Tuesday, July 7, 1987, at 7:30 p.m. at the Meridian City Hall, 728 Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho, to consider the application of Robin Prindle for a variance from Section 11-2-410A, Zoning Schedule of Bulk and Coverage Contrpls, of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Meridian which requires that the maximum portion of a lot that can be used to construct a structure on in the R-4 Residential District is 358= the Applicant requests to be allowed to use 498 to construct a 2,686 square foot structure on a 5,500 square foot lot which pursuant to 11-2-410A would allow only a 2,025 a square foot structure, on Lot 22, Block 12, Meadowview Subdivision No. 2, Meridian, Idaho, which is also known by the address 1081 Fairwood Court Meridian, Idaho. Public comment is welcomed and will be taken. Dated this 17th day of June, 1987. Nemay(n, City Clerk AMBROSE, FITZGERALD CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Aerldtan, Idaho 83642 nphonaMB4481 m "w �2 7 65 UNPLAT7911D 00 6904E3'2 0" W 150.00 N 59 c, I I' 1z"w E 3L-qc N, OX S 69'048',20" 2' 1om 41,4 10% m U) G 9-19, r A, 7 75..Oc V X0 -c-1 �l LOC Is IT b 0 F 9A CD i; A74 ci Do 0 0.2 0 019 7- w 10 0 K ".0 �Seo-1 e� I ... - "S *71U01 75.00' 75.00' 75-0c, 0 126.94. 005'14"E A9 L.- 75.0 S CHATEAUDRIVE _ 185.28, - - S 890 4W20"W - -0 -0- - P� ; 83.01 In 487.17' 50 oam 7 OC NIT 72.84 75.00' 0. U-tyze'W , 00, 7000, IPA5 c' -0 - BLOCK /J)yow C! 'O'l -0 -0 -1 V 1 6 1 -00 - t6 .0 /0- eo I w --a 036(00a -0 0 Eiiy '0 i�,-77. '7 Ms 89-48'2ib!'W 444sict .0 0 O?JtA.D� 0 c M". 042 -100.01, 16 - I " 1. 0, DV 0 5 010' �0 -0 W > 10 0 SAI�WIO'W� 0 9 0 -A m S89- 826, Poe 75 4 4 .0d 0.00, 5 5.66 70.00 F 5.8 5 5 6' 5 55.66 96.23' 65.IIg � 1 no , a ZAD too.02, wl NAA40%)w !no, 11100- 0 6 29M 2 0 ti ° i4I - "- eo a C-) 5 Z*1'14) C; ci 2 ci 0 N R043 N4 5- c6i IV -- 0 4 "4 L cp 04 to q 0 0 .0 T w too _0 1000.0 -45.00 55.86' iL 5.00 co A m COURT 01 FA WOOD ,IV4 S 9048'2d"w 0 Am V 100 ri i0510(l V 89046 26"w of, ri 780.44�' ,k s- 10 -CD > 50.00- T 55.00' 55.00' 55.00! fd 00 54.30' 100.03' J /4P: C-6 c ' oU uoa H a$ -A.60 J -0 a. qf;& 2 -3084 0 11 5.0 w 25 u ci#,# vii a 10 ;D ot 6 - gm 00 nr �t' 0 C -b- 1\0 lot 01"D `JS 8548 20' 2.50' Io 100.0e 20 S;r' . - 5 00�1`. . N 1 sy-e j. -0 z O'l 55-0d, 55,00' 55DO Gwo. 0 W 7 vr500- to E:l 02Q ?QB.36, 0 0 S 89482 1D ti 0 14 13. V IN ov*3 0 --- ?- 'i if 001 In 'IQ 10 0. ft 04 00 2 4' IV: - M 0 lb 0 41. 'c -* I A00 ei, .0d 0 7'� -75.00 1 75.00- 6 .12 C-26 c -'s -b 0,4 s890 8'.2d" v s al- !'20 W C-25 146 T 9 4 : Vol 1. 0 172 134. c�44R C- 62.06' 65.00' -S w 65.00, C-24 -24un ?Soo, W SL CK 0 r- 5-00- V - CD $6 1 lj% 190 0 . 14, 16 17 wl V 4: 11 UP�l cn u, lz� a- Iv'V�l 70.00 .0 85.00 5177, 30 0 S 890 59'52" Eto 419.00' 5.30' 75 p --,000 UNPLAYTED N 700 00'06" E 152.73 N 690 y MERIDIAN - CITY' COUNCIL • JUNE 16, 1987 PAGE # 5 ITEM # 7: Additional Agenda Item, Robin Prindle, Prindle Construction regarding shelter home he wants to construct in Meadowview II Sub. Mayor Kingsford, I see Mr. Prindle is present, would you come forward and explain what you plan on constructing? Prindle:;We would like to construct a Shelter Home in Meadowview Sub. Lot22, Block 12, the problem is under the City Ordinance it only allows 350 lot coverage by the building, our building -cover 49% of the lot area. Mayor Kingsford, do the neighbors know what you plan to do on that lot? Prindle: No. Mayor Kingsford: The building you plan to construct, I guess I do not have any problem with that, I think it is commendable what you plan' -to do and our -zoning does not have any effect on this type of building, I would like to recommend to the Council that it be approved conditional at least upon you getting the neighbors on two sides approval. Myers: What do you propose to do, place the building in the middle of that lot? q Prindle: The building will be within the setbacks. It is designed to look like.a home and will be well landscaped. Giesler: I would like to mention , I went over the plans and it is a very well designed project. With the landscaping it will be very nice. I think it will be done very professionally from looking at other pro- ject they have done. I personally do not have any problems with this but think the Mayor made a good point about the neighbors.and let them know what you have in mind. City Attorney: There is a Variance procedure, what you are doing is granting a Variance from the Zoning & Development Ordinance. Brewer: If everything as is said, there should be no problem execept going th1jou4h the procedure. Mayor Kingsford: What kind of construction schedule are you on? Prindle: I would like to start Monday, everything has been taken care of, the loan has already been approved, it is already to go. Mayor Kingsford, it would delay the project a month to go through the procedure, I think we should definately follow our Ordinances but it is something that is not so severe off our Ordinance but what we have granted Variances before. I think I would feel comfortable if we got confirmation back from the neighbors that they had no objection. City Attorney: I agree you should follow the Ordinances, the reason that Idaho Code reads the way it is, is because that people do object to hav- ing that type of facility next to them, that is why the -Idaho Code says you have to allow these types of.residents in a residential zone. To me I think you will save yourself a lot of headaches if you go through the MiRIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 16, 1987 • PAGE # 6 procedure now rather than fight it on end after you have already got the unit built and somebody comes in and says the--procedure-was not followed. I think you would save yourself a lot of problems down the road. Brewer, The Council, I think%should take this advise, I hate to do this to you, Mr. Prindle but I think one of the Attorney's best comments is in the long run it maybe a lifesaver for you to. It was the concensus of the Council that this should go through the Variance procedure and it would be expedited as soon as possible, It could be on the July 7, 1987 meeting. Department Reports: City Attorney: Do you want to bring up'the Claremont situation? Mayor\Kingsford; It probably would be just as well to bring that up now, it is past -the eighteen month time frame that we talked about and I asked the City Attorney to come up with what we needed to do with regard to that termination. City Attorney: Technically it terminated May 4-, 1987 so it ran more time than we allotted them, under the agreement it provides that if they fail to meet a p4yment that, can be treated as their request to with- draw their �a&plication, in the past,however, do to some of the circum- stances we have run into we did on one occasion. send them what was en- titled a 'default notice although the development agreement did specif- ically require notice of default we did do that on one occasion, on the last occasion the Council decided not to send a default notice but send a courtesy 1tter to Mr. Davidson. I see it being handled one of two ways, ,which I woull prefer the first, either send them a default notice saying you are in default of the agreement you haven't -paid giving the same time as before, the other way is to send them a letter stating that their failure to meet the terms of the agreement the City is terminating the application. -- Mayor Kingsford, I think we are talking about a different thing in this instant, it is not a matter of them not meeting a monetary payment, this time it is a time that they agreed to, that.eighteem month period has elapsed and so it is nota nonetary failure, it is the time they asked for has elapsed, they have not picked up a building permit. I would like to see us go with the second one and just say in there by failure to pickup a building permit by the time specified we deem the agreement terminated, if that is the wishes of the Council. City Attorney: The only -reason I prefer the other way is we have treated it under the default procedure before. A default could be a payment or other things like a failure to pickup a building permit. The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Giesler that hey srr ijd a letter to Mr. Davidson of Claremont Development they are in default of the Development Agreement not only specified but also on the monetary portion and give them respond to the City Attorney's letter. Motion Carried: All Yea: the City Attor- Company that on the time ten days to- �► e NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN Pursuant to Sections 11-2-419D and 11-2-416, of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing Tuesday, July 7, 1907, at 7:30 p.m. at the Meridian City Hall, 728 Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho, to consider the application of Robin Priidle for a variance from Section 11-2-410A, Zoning Schedule of Bt ilk and Coverage Controls, of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Meridian which requires that the maximum portion of a lot that can be used to construct a structure on in the R-4 Residentiai District is 35%; the Applicant requests to be allowed to use 49% to construct a 2,686 square foot structure on a', 5,500 square foot lot which pursuant to 11-2-410A would allow only a 2,025 a;square foot structure, on Lot 22, Block 12, Meadowview Subdivision No. 2, Meridian, Idaho, which is also known by the address 1081 Fairwood Court Meridian, Idaho. Public comment is welcomed and will be taken. Dated this 17th day of June, 1987. I F ,Jack/Ni , City Clerk AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Merldlan, Idaho 83842 Telephone 8884461 0 • C111 U, MERIDIAN i28 Meridian St. Meridian, ID 63642 VARIANCE APPLICATION (RE: Meridian Zoning Ordinance NAME: PHONE�2-8-3-2-44 Owner or holder of valid option ADDRESS: 1081 Fairwood Ct. GENERAL LOCATION: North of Cherry L ne -hptwppn T.inclpr & Nnrth 10th LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Lot 22 Block Mp clawPipw Snh_ PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR VALID OPTION: A copy of your property deed or option agreement must be attached. PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATIORL VICINITY SKETCH: A viAlity map at a scale approved by the Mayor showing property lines, streets existing and proposed zoning and such other items as the Mayor may require. SURROUNDING PROPERTY 014NERS: A list of all property owners and addresses within contiguous to, directly across the street from, and within a 300' radius of the parcel (s) proposed for a Variance must be attached. (This information is available from the County Assessor.) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE:T & R Construction would like -a, varia-nne oved to construct a home will cover 49% of the said Date Received Received By SIGNATURE: CITY COUNCIL. RECORDS ,'/ v Cite Council Hearing Date s This agreement is entered into on this 19th day of Fehruarv. 1987 for the purpose of stating the intent of all parties regarding the building lots discribed as: Lots 3,4,6 ,n)>(,22 and 25 Block 12 and Lots 3 and 7 $lock 14 of Meadow View Subdivision, Meridian, Idaho between T and R Construction, Buyer and �. S, -j __PNyes%rnedj_ J --d Seller. (.rv►c•rcin fiuyer does hrrehy"0htain I lit, right rn purch" marJct H►rcl-r.�L1, all the abr►vtl discribed building lots over aft -.rel -f fvrft-) month period commencing at the time this agreement is fully executed. However, if Seller eceives an acceptable offer on any of tae above lots the Buyer will haler5 days in which to _lose on said lot. The total purchase price of. -.,.each lot is $6,250.00 and Buyer agrees to pay for all lots not sold'at the time this agreement- reaches maturity. The additional terms and conditions apply; 1. Seller agrees to deed to Buyer each parcel as it is sold. 2. Seller will be required to furnish title insurance to Buver Buyer Buver LaICU Seller ("_`J' -�"`� Lt`�.•!t1 �(PJn`' A7vrns-/,-h ,�s�t.'IJ Dated I � _ 0 ALEXANDER, Nolan Derk & Tina R. 1091 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 21 Block 12 ULIN, Mary H. 1111 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho Lot 20 Block 12 • MARSHAW, Richard A. & Lee Sherry 1092 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 32 Block 12 KIRSCH, Robert & Kathleen T. 1112 Fairwood 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 33 Block 12 BASURA, Lynn P. 2252 NW 11th Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 18 Block 12 BRADSHAW, Larry E. & Susan L. 1077 Fairwood Ct. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 23 Block 12 TAYLOR, Robert Mike & Gail 1053 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 24 Block 12 HEFNER, Sharon K. 1142 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 34 Block 12 NEISEN, Randolph A. & LeAnn M. 1122 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 16 Block 12 ROWELL, Daniel E. & Shelly J. 2222 NW 11th Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 17 Block 12 JENKINS, Keith B. CARROLL, Phillip R. & Theresa M. P.O.Box 5597 1080 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 26 Block 12 Lot 14 Block 12 PEUGH, Clayton H. & Vickie D. DOUGHTY, Ronald Steven & Carol 1012 Fairwood Ct. 1074 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 27 Block 12 Lot 13 Block 12 BROOKS, Monte E. & Gaye A. 1034 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 28 Block 12 GAROUTTE, Greg & Rita 1054 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 29 Block 12 BROWNING, Wallace III & Sheila 1078 Fairwood Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 30 Block 12 SECRETARY OF HOUSING & URBAN DEV. P.O.Box 42 Boise, Idaho 83704 Lot 31 Block 12 MORALES, Raul 1052 Delmar Meridian, Idaho 83642 Lot 12 Block 12 'UN PLATTED 69049'20"W • f f9 150.00' N 0001 I' 17" W 1 100.00' 159.971 1 1 B C I I'�4 e a ° s y� S �39� 48' O" W 41 42' Q' - N M�f v Ln O 'R/as S' OO1I 1 M Is 70 3915.9t-� '\ o M . Sf ' v ° S 9p°f0�g5W0, W10. J f 26.94' 9.19' 350 75.58'{ 075.�V� 1` O ' K/01 o . 75.00 � " 75g0�08 / .75.00 75.00 11 75.00 75.00 s 830181,30"E 3a1 s 83°05'14" p DRIVE 6'3o"E 16628' E CHATEAU _ _ sesa46'zo"w __ �8}3.0f' » 487.17' o S _ 'o7,%,rte 5 0' �%5 63. �7 7284' 78.00' a 0 70.00 0.0 7 .00' b "In M/ W/�� R BLOCK (W /��,7Q WS89 4820ow ' W +I4H4 a o #� y3 ° 6' - d B \ o o 11 o 420 I .100.01' Z �U oo ��0_o Ua o� 0 b yU o_ saga a 20„ o t`%/� \ o W ✓ ?7 I $ - 5.00' 1d o i '�r� �c fs �l se ae'20'w �'0 8 6� oo' 5.0o Ts.od oo' I'i \ b5.00 5.8 ' 55 55.86 56.86 55.66'' 70.00 , 1`� m ►00.02' W �.�% o� ti0, 3 bo G o) _ UU 14° w -8s ro 96.23 o m v o .' ,� 3 Ali . Ucd IC'i, o � N q�, 35 o0 3 S 0 33M o 2 erg 310oa o 3CM/� 0 29� m 2 a o QV:R, O r- °I`S1 O C O. n � � - �V�,7 - p 1� N �i _ G� ' y 0 ' tD fA 'Oi I rn ` y f}I�tSBFi ,�1J3 III�O.Ij /"�r� /�-®�� c� 2� IO° Np 00.0 ' ' •45.00' 55.86; 86' '=55-ei 1trt>'tf ° COURT "- : cyy/� s.00`�O m FA RWOOD s 9aae'2o"w o v pp cliIt 0 I obi~ 9048'20 A 4''h`° ' 4N _ ; )80n:44' 89°48 20' w i N I J S/ rig m _ 05.00 4^�m I 100.03' h 50.00' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00 54.3 ' p" V rr wt -6 ,Z 39,x° a a . S`��Id 97 goF 0 'Io3am m 'j���D omom IOONy� 25 -mSZ a +�F S" QO 5.0 ti2bg 1p 01 Z 875o 5.0f 0.03 0 ;S 89 i O. 55.00 55.004 8"'1 -60.-- 0 CyVI\\IN 55D0 60. 578a•. 24'5`0"1 % W 1�$'��a N oas.00' T . > 6V5.00so.0v' F la P 3, �°'� d� ov f7�������y�// 5q 50 S93a 589°4821 v _Ir bo �A 5 0' a �8 � ll ',"� I 62.74, -_ 8- _rI o _ o N` 1 5=9-482tl_... Y �� M 4 46 Cb 1 a14 N-01 �r 0` !� l d Z. �v 0-6.12'�V"C 26 /06 y Ig . m IDU o 'Z 14 �l 0 m L00 �V7 %75.00 75.00' 7$.00 _ M - b S 89°4820" S a9°48'i:0" W C-25 s _ p a 172.06' 134.05' ' `�,� Q ate+ 1 AS e � S 0e, o C -7a 4 d+ C. 62.06' _ 65.00' h W ,h 65.00'"n -C-24 X65 / C- W G 5 4 -.24.05'���/. 5'.1 .75 (( f 001 rW BL CK o- W t\ o �..� •C-20 � o in/,� rJ o, V o - _ 16 a v D �� 75.00' V01 iR OD /boa o Ig o/ 17 I $ w�8. m a a,� N� 13G °o = exp _o 1.4 �fl � N �7 �y � .•,200 / O�I �� O M 7 a• p I I ti c O (' °71_65' 40'70.00' .0 N .Z -� 85.00 51.77'=z2, O �>f� - - - -- - 0p"7''j�lh , % S 89059'52"E 419.00' y I, 14,A% Q7S0 0 11 UNPLATTED N 700 00'06" E 132.734 N 89' 101 Meridian City iia;ll ®® The Malror mentioned low—Income -hour ng present a plan for None of the Counc .2. October 16, 1972 I- hat ave B dine had contacted h'm con ruin the need for -�Irly hart -.-tie develop_ers should com befo e the) Council or e Coy ncll to study. -- — - -- - --�—" desired tofhecome involved int is. his m ter was ahBeautv r of sible T= — wasd sous e eSalonas�oes to lace a mobile h me on a IotL house - -- -- - -- - ou ;ourcii-s5 ed ­tza -Home -Ceur�—With­et-her'__ structures -- -- ---- -- -- - he Ordinance. I i � oof f this tyVp e accordi'xg to t- W_aJrie- Skiver the Ch firman of the Zoning_and_Plannin� Com�raissio_I , stated that NAI'1 Corporation (Me ow View Subdivision will - -- -'H for the well �rhen t e Cit, a r ) pu u the�r prepayment mon es --- - _y__�p fives the plans f til preliminary. Phis amount is S�6 0 0,00 and is - ;guaranteed when their) plans are _�ccepted. Mr. Glover also explained'that �he Ada Counci.l of c',o ernm�r. s hopeful of the political governjnents; approi ing a Com_prehensiv_e lmn of defiinin gec� raphic liriits within which�he growth and develoVmeii.9 of a municipality would be contained. o et - _ t r The main desire is i � - ---- ------------ _ conte t of holding growth approval of the Political overMients pf the F t with�.#� defined. limits to c use more delnse growth g 1 rather thain urban Diver rt,ted t r:t the outside limits of the com;hrehelsive plan for - -- -- --..� _ 5t 'rove Linder. 1Jstick P,o d and the Freew j, or Over at the mos�-PT - — s - e Meridian area is Locu ¢-- -- - ---� $_. _ _t� -- The - - id be discoura ed Sou h of Mr5k�ver st<.ted,___t shou the Fi%ewaye rod ci an€dereen I The Motion was made by Marvin Bodine and seconded b9rIW. D, , City �kiv that the defin-in boun&iries roue the I. I g � � pity within which nro'th wduld bed area_by__- favor_ the cQnce4 t cif controlling tha._gro�rtu. lditk n a ,1i.rr�te! r> �' � confined, - MoUor, panned: Skiv6r• Ye -0; yen;Bodine y, r, 9� Pdriv,3r o9 yea. i E. L. Bennett has relquest, to be relieved from the)arming an ZoningJ1 I - �J Commission. The_letter_-.o resignation- is_on-file_wi h-those_mi tes, _ D. Skiver suggested Dr. Lee Pulle be. assigned to�flll W - -y-- - - the u x fired term' - - p -- u it a 01� T "i 104 �rW e{ ' s , AN j V Meridian City Hall #P Meeting called to or er b the ayor, Don M. Store Councilmen present: IMarvAn Bodine; John Navarro; Ken Richard Wil liams. Others present: Roger Welker; Uom Ham; R. Z. Reudah; Vir it T Phillips; Dewey Wells; Ken Sam Tearq; Rickard Pelkola; Kelly Ee Car Ell worth• David Curtis; Jay Mi Robert S4 Br -o ; Stanton Nuffer; Han Claude B own; endy Thompson: Vernon 4V, March 7, 1977 us en and L'ean iom Turco; e• R nda Teare; Wayn Crookston, Jr.; c)hn oll L K en Houst; Minuzes or previous meetirg rea and approved. Mr. Reudah complains of dogs running at large in the 4eadow View Subdivision and that the Dog catcher is not doing his job. He co Tai ed of dirty yards. The Mayor stated that the City has a part time dog catcher. The police are doinj all they can to cont of d gs. 9he Mayor pointed out hat Citi en can sign a complaint and the City will prosecute. It was pointed out by Mr. Willi s that people had signed ome c mplaiats in the past in his Subdivision. Now the situation is better. The Teare Subdivision was discussed. The Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission were reviewed, The Planning and Zon nth d su ested that this matter be abled pending consulting with the Gity ttorney. Mr. Williams stated 1hat his matter had come up prey ousl on A ril 26, 1976 This same Subdivisionwas discussed at that time it as a ain d cided that the one acre request bed ied d the City also afire d th t thi land should remain 5 Acre tracts with overlay to be provided f r f ther ubdividin when City services become vaiab e. On -May 3rd 1976 th Cit Council agreed with the P1 in and oning, Mr. Teare Stated he ad done ever thin in th_e ro er manner with the Ada'Coua Commission and had received on 5 zone. He only wants to build two homes on this land in a $60 0 0 - OP0 value. _ Mr. Turco indicated 1here_ 's a g7ound water problem. Mr. Teare stated thal heIzed a c awl space under his 'louse 3 fee deep and this has never been wet._ He h is not building in bhe a w g to the overlay, thus he is in re ity comploying with the overlay. _ It was shown that ov r_lay as been recorded on Book a Marvin Bodi3�e stated (that these _acre tracts were no to e f e deyelobed until City -Sewer was avail ble. -----Mr. Williams stated that t e intant was to have this ubdi ide cc rd t the purpose of the o erla if di ided again. Mr. Pelkola, Enginee for reare, stated that he felt t at the overlay not being numbered does not _ u if s a Platted do The Mayor stated thall he t1lought there -_ iht rested parties and representatives of tie City and Mr. Turco to see what can be worked out with theount Commi Tom Turco stated that --the- platted and showed 1 to 3 eet ws found as a water t ble. The water table ehouldhe Department can not approve additional structures. p a p 3 Meridian City Hall Meeting called too der b7 thQ layore Don 14. Storcy 711 j t0 mbors present: W. D. Shiver, Konnoth Rasmusson;' M .. b'� av V rZ VSO 0O vja Ed Bb�J �•rf Fels V`kN.i':f.�411g n gn Bo3worth-Sullivan �OEllSoassy 1.10DIJ-0 rior.I and C id riY mwani • .. Of�� Rot or Wo q og or; pa omou3 risco u ,, .A, "Ric" Thiorhouoo, r`q.g Noridi orcrj f ,2*5o oa�^.0 ; suranco� o Eu rge Ono C a�-ld dip: av or ., EWyl ® f ISlg f] if a Ada Cotianty C0M.10sloner h.a$3 "U JL ` 9 "y . Minutes of Juno 2,, 1975 Council eating gore road En €pp®vod. loro7 Atwood of A11 ousinj Pro j ct uas present. PI®.. Action wasak en- by Council FU3,2 6 �5r'® � available at this ti � n. Tin ' o voxld J®® ZfLg n ®Y=zo �,�o require him to cin -r tach tho Bard of Hcaltha Earz7Procdmm of B ba fluohnd to reduce ass'T excoes 14obII3 card Homo Parr ras pros . in v for lino, instructed to mise ,a. in Ruching: t re Llesti .S hydranto ranee® Stuart, LJorh 0 c road before and aften Sup9t.9 and vmo assiot rang ,its o avo motors r .gin oarpr c asa reLos yrequesting haat bot oxen gg Block y 60 eor o � ppl and a� Meadow View Subdivic Ea l ozrn b on., izz . erant,,el preae�a , a variance 02 D 9P Zs-nmm was, si o press ortLino and not tbo- reguf�rcd , R -MME, w ®H UH5 nada tyr Koadon Vaow Subdivis Rl on be n Crantod and oocandcd by John a variance of 315" lfavz from o t vlest Lot Vj, ., 0 .do propcity no emd not tho rent I -lotion passed: O. Skivar,, e Y at Raemucacna yea; B „ ins yca; 2lavarro, ycao Ted Hopper i.ras proccnt t , discus his Commercial Pro7orty, corer of FA. CyourseIa °11 hird Ano cd Platt 1.1,'o Hoppor, otated k3-= i3o41l- le., ° t9a$f!3' liISf3 th&°eau h his .Loporty to er—ient irr, �_ 14nos bordering his, e-enn octiona On Ci Lnat �Mtor Ald object 1-02 to knving to install Ly- dr a s ark nccoasary Pt this point it was Tod HernorNennoth Rarmnpmon., at ):00 Tiuosda, eue-grestod n Jully t Ate, f%h 140yo?r Storay that tho Uoa' D to of J9 U®B En nrn o roaolve and make d , ciei ks e o S discuAs nQ , p°t,,,Bruco Stua,y,�, anis further Mayor Don. Stoaro7ra .. es a oindod do bz that Env further hiringeat' roonn R',far 'Vator _ cmd' wlocrcr Dcpaetment ought �o tho attention of the Council" It was brought tote attention of they Council that I here is an Auto Repair business b©ing con . as Bostrum2 s Auto Repair, cted on Fier dian Stroats botwee+n Stat and arlton, knecan ULSioaf Green is to in until appro7al of C Use 1�rmito esti ty Oich atoa and re to inform lir, BostrM fires potition of net&bo to no to , hoed ind gor opera to . a epocfI P�,7or Storq7 ropor-twd that Mr S ndorg vms to have rotor eid per, for Ilell #3 ui�.e� S s on o roady fez* i ns$ ati cite bola held ret In 0 -thin l.ffio on ®° a, d week, Naterials for l�a In vel. Meridian City Hall o2o May 5. 1975 - - - -- ; -- ---- - - - -- �- l = 4 _ wa_gI preset to explain the audit ani present the audit _ Roland Smith, Aud.ito�r i n forwation statemen•�s fox? exami0ation by the City coo ncil b F�:^, Smith �:�s S i � C _'�17� _tY1F ;Ci'y @(°03�C S axe 1�®C l _ p�_�% iL €l �, lL_ 3�t Clerk cooperated in Eve r'' I`'ray toi assist them in and d r ng the at�dit� - — The Motion 1•Jas mace _1 y W,, P. Skl er arca seconded by M).ruin Bodin that the L audit be Motion passed- Skive ! r, yeah Rasmussen, yeas Sod ne fl ea; Nc varro 9 yea, 11 i I -'° � `� p°I _ -- -- S aTLT1�unGlllg the 4es� om i;he� Association of Idaho C� u� The Mayor read a l etil - - 1 - r..sso0_at�ion Di..si,ric � Imee-tinp to !be held Friday at 6:o1nfl Mail' 99 1975v at the Holiday irkn to assist in plans fir the forthcoming AN Con' entiosL to be held. he �Jeok o; une 3- g and i21 at Idaho Fallso _ � Ric Orton stated the testin and pumping of the nddt�J ��J�ll „�-� and ,s found 1,0 _ hold up to 1300 gallons per minute", This water is a little hardgr then the - ?fit well and a little i�nrmer in (temperature,, While pumping at 966 , gpm there is a 160, draw down, I this �- 7-� ' '�.� j3°11e_Gp'�S_ G,S-r,].ti'12,� �t�d � _-(Aid'. art®IC- cyan, G+1Cn1 � thG� J _ Engineers- - e was y . ' the viell. Ij The Moti Wa___ �� dine_anrl-seconded- b AJ e i� �� ��,�� seas h _ �. -- jKennoth Witt be paid , the sums of � lUn925m25 at this tine with a �.o% retainage ®.f �11,547n25, _ Motion passed- Slvvea yeas Ras�ussenq yea; Lodine9 yea; N�v--ar-r-os y -ea-© - ---r -- -----� ----- - Marvin Bodine su esi#ed re -__-- - -- - I I I ✓ gg h - ®vin t. i ��dz of building -m-_ _ftp-ti.c�u� iron t _ ba d,. n a i e Ce the pump: house #8 from the blqd sp4cif9 cations as - - - on alternate �l _ to the biel if _i.10e co )M�t __tlas _kx �� h�_t tin (;_ t co ld. build outside the bid,, - ----- t was pointed out that there had been some -saving ex�erle ced in Well #7_ Marvin Bodine sreportq d con derna.?a the � acre Fart[ Iie elopillent and suggested erningt® e 15 �ha��. �a.`� e be p� aced ��n the a �e _Park irk I ' l - - dur nZ- th _ construction_ - - d rnon Schoen s to act taedclompaAy to t_a_—?? -aILsce- �g- - _eruirecto carrythe water pakl w -period, .. -®L -r.._- .��-ev_.—l�---._e_ Rogeralevoughti - —- b,di4sio-uphy iateo a Carol Holhad boon I presented tdrawings t®review for fire protection, 'County This natter will cure to the AdaZonia;,g ComrYai s-Ri oda vhl o uJ ll ask our ----I Planners —for thei N input and recommendati_onso I --� 'Cary Green stated that speed- signs are be ng_placed_ a_�o-und.tbq_radway 7 City and past the schools by Ada Coumty Highway 'Di sta�ict� leading into the — -- - r- -- - - sted ��?�eet lights for his Subd� isio 9 r�eac�.otJ View Mro Cir, stensen requ6 , -- iglu i . vt- i s��bd�.��� ora thr®u � ,-she Chief ®. -w-, - - -� - - - _ Q — - ; -- - — -- lighting o?r Mead.ow iii ,cJ i s Jas poen ed ou wk;.a t s v�Aeet be�nr� cons,dered tun-der ,.,t y g ecause'a house built t�?is-y6ar is notaxed Until e "� years budget, _ --- -- - --- _ -- Y�eAr�'°o Meridian City Hall �- --- 1 Ric Orton t"ras present -co Chisoposa- r `� p is necqss tl o �-a;. I ins ri �a Irri- gator line nedds ,c O � 11 o2(D .acus the Philli-ps Addi'c -- `co bei presented for two be approved, cause -cz2ae eve ep Y - o December 2, 1974 Dev4lopf,3er�t;, located Sols -- ---- while she Lra%=r SoC✓n� -- ----� 4 Mr. Orton stated tha- the �Tawpa J�Ieridian if igati on Dx.s tr �t had been - -- --- r a - i III d he Ada County ,y Highw y District i ct �s still to respond o�noer,��i19 � Jei_a a =opal ° — a _ = 1 _ _ pl^, - _ -'--- - _ trete even ted , t o tl�i m � �✓f PIKS `V `� r x�S� t��1 9 � L��11�_ l Dov_ �� Ouez ion a-9 -P0 �nw-I!1� i)l,ti `� ""-E-�y-�1n�Pa ���s� -_e A� this c�+me therei will e 20 homes by the o" the � ear and 20 -'i a May—de-8-111- - Phillips ps Uas ins armed `py •che Mayor that he muse -P a� i�� that �tJatie� deli mer Iri `i be 1j ---- -- - r pplyi and he will need �- o I -- - — - I y -- lho u 1 __eMd a10 tr_t_� Others i water is i -� short delilve Y y tri -chi n -the Ci i.yoI `rho President of i -he iCouncil repbrt;ed the y indinr-s of I the F}iann�r�g and mooning z ft-iritfi� ioT iV n 21 f r'2Ss' � di"Viz--o f -p`, poza -LYlt lleiQ� r'��;oieyriitT_f'tl -- �� acceptsance with corrccti on � o I i -Dude- �, tJ_- y- _o hiIvIc-'- and-seuo udicy J-hu--Wzzvay'0 �nat� -`V°rte ---- l�ill��lw`Js Ad("7ir;in11 P�fiirlR �fl'y'if.6"�ii�'�,nn�fir. ,lovtinw — - ems: �w7Grai V ! Una riz-1 � y �e C' 8t 110 eIx cT �igYi 't`+�g1k 1 received by i,he Ada douxi y' Iii ghul y District, the Cen6 a al D3- strict Health Dept., =� �,o-Ur1e�� b f=ig$ dint -_i dory: y Druce St;uaz,, t, the Narr pa-Meri diani irrigation District 1111d SaWner JiohnBonl o, (� f� rr��'o�✓� �� ��i�-� 2�-r; r�ee �� o _ - - - — --- I -- I- I Motion passed- ISki ve.?� o yea'; Rasmussen p yea, Bodine q lea; Navarro, yea ° RS G' Orton `: epr esente Gary ' o f al � `r n the ma•o to o� I } - I- Smith, th -- I Mc�adoty C ietr l l eta t on goo acce� wiIIg tyre in 1s ��11r on i n r �i s u ,c1 0 on d`� e attentlo�a' o the Coin oiMr�_l r,® �,h c®Y?�tiuuct,�on l?a`�,c L1a- �zt�e� the - _ l N it ., - "ltd t�6�1 .� - �.. � co�lst� fog one eras af•%eI l�oe�plcjt;-ion �� the project `+ n the Subdl vise on, _ i pntr actor has agreed fo pe ora �4 nd c®r roc at� laccoretin � , 5r�h� C - - - - - - -- --- temp g �® Mf'.Stt� t Tho i y Marvin n Bodine and seconded. by �enno-L Ra.sl�#ussen °cg�athat--- - -- --- ! e Motion was Made k� — tl -- - c ltcac o i vl cti✓ u dl ; s� ®n r1� a cep��.&Vv c -e U-� tj7- o f of idii n t"✓ -a �;h the - - �unde�Stand ng that tree contract,ok, complete the unpini;hed �)or`ciorls o -F .che Vie✓ i ig a @cOltlklle X�de by 'cam c l r� I1g an ®Y7 rl C pGi1Fi1=tl(si 6Fi Yl the WOIAC° s Supe. i nt;e-&-Ient Motion passed. y 9 c.SmuS;;enea � , y a° BodIne, )n -a- NE var ro 9 yea. --- - - - - Police s - � the Chief o u _° i area that a; i here a r e_ businesses i ti � Roo - - - ---- _- � C�r,,leE',s that crea o a problem b remaining nl ra open lat;e,t, than 12 to ser �e a� p y g s _-- - - e Came Ro®rr3 at the j Botring-AllelY � s reraainin� open aY a er � 2 p 00 m Came Roolt3 ± s separa ccl; ofi the Bfw l i ng Alley i .c 1:ras p��, n cec`� out. - - -- Tr� 1,33? —, 3ry , - -r - -- - -- -- A �elr3en cents '��?p tatrn c1®' es a 2 o Ott Mic2n rffl 'c-�--- ie of The Cil, _. i 1�aci all Oeste Rool,ts shou`V� abic�1e `�� ��2 same -- — — — °p h - - -- police ne hoia h t-1lacion� astc7 be cdo.�ed a•� `12° 0 y�lldr2l r �• -- �� � � �-- -- o 0h9 C i3_u P i�, P:Pi SIN , �C.nb, ,u, 311 ec, -A t �_��_p, g P1l p'ei 'r h� Yr1 i:nY`i1r� fir�_�PC -- _ .. _ __ his Department in the best manner possible, -- mOO 4• $ W re A K WHIN P,1711171�1 Meridian City Hall IIWVIzUjU%;I_ G1,Vj_(Lt Special Meeting cal 3ed-to order by the Mayor Don M. tore Councilmen Present: Kenneth Ra mussen; Marvin Bodin Jo n Navarro S k i v rq absent Others Present: Do Smit hger; Lewis Keys-, Ed Au at Hein; Earl Marks; St n McD nald- Dale Grubb"— R char Ort n- Du ch Williamsj Da cell echac er; John Hoffman; R—o-ert laisy r; R. B. Glenn; Di k Smi h- Otr n EroseL Sumn=(!Lr S-ith• Ji Stub lefie d -Ric Ortonrepresent JU3 Engi eers. presented ro Sala concerning layipS of water lines aloe Pine Avenu and Linder Road to u pl the uater needs for the new Moridia Hi h Schoo to be built at Lind nd r an Pine. To satisfy the line size iffer ntial for the line 1 id volves the costs Of installtion. The Cit I ro o ed that the -11"d rtic* ate the la 'ng of the line, not in ash utlay but in differring fu,ure aymen a. The School District s to la t e 1011 water line. The tentative propo, I di curse was: the School is e alt 0 euivalent connections a ox. 00.00 year water us ap L ox,, 2 000,00 The I 000.00 Mayor at statedthea i--otiajel-ost the h it esired to partici t and offer he above proposal to-eefiter a aring with the schoo in 0 ap oximato value as shown above. map showihg where the 1011 line is t be p ced. Mr. Orton displayed The Mayor explain d hat—wave e Ci y could not enter in o– an cash payment because the City i not a ch funds. The City could ossi deforr payments as adjustme the City ta. He mentioned to the school representa ves that would need n en�.inpn-r rl r1l concerning the laceme t of this line and rn th eso hyd antsl elbows, ties, etc. includc-d. The Motion was made y Ma vin B dine and seconded by Kenneth Ras usson that tho hook-up fee for -rater and o years uscrfees for Ovate be v *ved for the new school in th mat or of -e participationin the Ovateline long Pine Avenue and Linder Ro d,0 Motion passed: Bodi eq ye ; Rasmussen, yea; Na Na yea The School represent UVO left at this time. d -8—c mission to state that the y- 8 walver o water user There -Vias additional flees is to begin aft r th buil,ing is released to t 0 Sc ool Di tric by_ on rac or, he to release to the cont acto 'is to pay the constr ctio .. water used prior - a sc ool,,I Due to the water sho tage it wa determined that the schoo sho d not use the domestic water to sp Sumner Johnson sugge inkl lawn and landscapi area ted hat t is one (1) year of i ter a ould a credited the school and not to he de eloper during the construction -riod. _--to Meadow View Nl:and ,rthg tei.Su division in the matt r of he wa er shortage in the Cit The Mayor stated that One house or " twenty adds to th volute of - ter demand. e 7-1 iWA ti the demand at prese It ha-a-bg�o-m-hapo to Seell installation of favi li ie for ater delivery both i well and Ines. 0 Meridian City Han -- — ---- _ --.--- _ At the present time there m`® are n November Funds romised to 21. 19 4 a sist in th would cost roughly $ 00q 0000. City is morally comm tted'to th CA1 i�W Vq_"A' installation Of a n The Mayor felt that w wel perha that s the AQ t divisions to delive ser ces n w that the lands sQ Sub- this will Iver of place the City in a services to the pre The City cannot del criti ent ver al o a d lon s wethi are anne9edq bit ition which could of Oct he de time resident users that it does not ve t ive, The Mayor suggested L Y { and. f?� ori this time �, --moo-- -- that a is ecommendin,g to the C,unci for doption of o n the a nail -—�e��i II be new and higher h ok-u fees for all nett e Sub _ ivisons have not inc uded provi It was pointed out yground eis at t ions to Some even too h gh an rolling to flood d irrrigat o a The question was as ed as to wh t development the Ci y co ld est ;.c$, ® a Byer s ca could sell in 1975. a as eve open a wou. c c emjt an c oma ob the balance of 135 'n s a 197 a if t e wou Be ® s ey can be solder or OU s o• a— It was pointed out pro em, we ss have consumed the a hat pu diti t is t own a 1 c e new users that care y e e s acity, to t e wat-r shortage ser co e new ora— - Sumner Johnson stat Won); aMad with e d th tre , t :th;ity would lose the -- A su port �f the City The City could move x1nd the un so forw rd toud�rd the drilling and _ nsta ling f they can The pump has a long time dolive y problem that can h ld a the peration of -- - a wallx or many mon , -- There was discussio con ornino the new construction e awn s -ar Irig c u a posy one un hers wo can e pp • The tri nor pa of the funds, �c a e any con rac s awaree psi r o ei -UY__ now x n s a n th s pro eedure the 1 L o o nnson sae era contract awarded of er f !may taou YgO 3ece 9e m�n a e tae cou e dr e deral funds are approved. tun S Ong OOSYm OY The Engineers state tha bids for the a well if a ded now ions and n tires to troll if at rded now cions and n tires to -- would require consi erab e -- __Feta driller to udo- _ -_ Th.e Engineers state tha would require consi arab a -- met a driller to u doter -drilling -of tim to prepare specifica the all,, bids_ for the drilla cif a tim to prepare specific the Oall. The Mayor asked the uesi_on Place for its locat on b _ — -- involved in growth xt th s t favo time, t if the near well is ble to benefit the S int bdiv 11Qd ould the ans hat are Ric Orton es'ponded that the to The placement of a cell Could The volume of pumpi g ca acct or is the source of of cause that mach in eems to be the im or rens luen ant re fo the system. Q. actor, - There was a suggest on oI Deve —r opera paying for the roll nd co itting future hook-up to turnTtheir The Catty Clerk poin the present program future programs, ifinancing, ed o t that redu es the committing future re favorability of bonding erve t to a complish e bac %round Yn k t 1a t r K CA1 i�W Vq_"A' AQ t .C^,F' vtK t'dYy;.�z,5'fF "k4k';4k y .+jiJ"-.. t74, T W t�1 �4f%a5`vM'�'`7y'i�$''3.i`e}�PpE.ggki :%i}kTM dk ^kX}knt �.4 k i �Y � '� fitq' M � 32. VSf' t F E x r� 9k"r•$S& i Pip ih - T M�.� '� 3 � p {iR a�#i `,F i$e1 . a.�3 i�r.,ijp �ro •,_v.J I Meridian City Hall o3o November 21, 1974 The Mayor stated that seve al pr grams _would be const erredto re ieve the water volume pro em If irrigation of lawns is involvad alternate days for irrigation would need to be required and p chaps retri,ting irrigation of 1 i -ms to nigHt tinf57 rough es ami e -of users to coma on ti Crestwood 30 units Meadow_ View 13 5 7 a -n -i -;s Northgate 20 units - Washington Square a s School 20 Tedi �ta�- -25— nits nags - -- r - -- Tota. 305 units It was pointed out by the Mayor that the Federal Funds participation -with the city are based prim ily o job Tien a proposal- pro ec s pa a an residential users. Sumner stated that the ear iest time for a well to be on the lin is into E the year 197 ig funs are mate d �* Federa monies n p r ps eves a er. Me Mayos stated thai he Is cone reed with 19749 how a er 9e n rme those present that the cit %-Al perform as best it can to provide mil .mum service fi'a to all users, He Stated the that the City posse y co c no eep Q builders from building but -they should know that therB - - will -- -definitely -I-- be a water shortage for some time. The Mayor stated def nits to y the water would be curtai ed for laze _ sprinkling 1. Alternative ays spri le 2© Irrigate at Aight.L � -- Glaisyer a ked ifhe C would attempt a bond issue to Irmprove the a ert i system° The stated that his Answer would have to be yes. -Mayor The Mayor stated the the Fire protection in the volume f1 w of rater is not good Robert Glaisyer stat d that thele are two alternatives as he sees it to provide --un s o o—brow e KurCdd 2. Local Im rove ent District (LID) I The developer of NAN is concern d that their Subdivi ion �� s approved some _ time ago; they have ispent considerable money; now they are infor ed that utili�ies may not be deli4eredoThe what he is trying to tel the �levelo per is that the — Mayor informed h m that --- City has a problem a d that they feltha need to realize thi f the issue was shor grope age. ly pr _ - -_- rented the - -- - Owen Prost stated that he people Eroul�_vote a and ssu willing to — - Others in the group were of ain that the pe ple w uldb do this°T�ie Mayor stated to he d vel°esent that the ity could n t deliver er ac Yaey d not ha a togivul made every x or o e Iver e services of hater and sew_ ge9 tat the City had attempted on tih t - is y a to inform them of not have adequate s vice to de iver.until additional, fac litie are installed. The next item of business _a t w s discuss with the develop p rs theitems not; -- comp e e anth ear nstial a ion so The Mayor requested ro Stuart o present a list of deficiencies in the construction in the Meadow View Subdivision° (This list is on file nrith these minutes° t Meridian City Hall .4, November 21. 1974 Bruce Stuart explained th Su iv s on on file Jith deficiencies heseminutes), of construction in the Crestwood #1 Representing Nort ga e Su division Jim Stubblefield requested Irmission to install meter yokes This Matter was discussed for Irater by the meter installation oa Council and. Mr. Stliartno - their proect. definito action was taken. Wa er Department vith the Ric Orton discussed Council the Water Rate and r nanceo Mro Orton explained that a. the new ordinance there would a application - � easq Inspecti-dn—tees and Iprice set for meter install tion . �r I The Motion was made the City adopt a Hook-up by Kenneth fee Rasmussen sch.dule and seconded for water and s by John tiger Eta Navarro follows: that Single family We Single Family mu Motion as d. ° There being no other -ter Hook-up ewer ook,-u' �1ei�Fr."—L1Y1Ipler Rasmu a b s' n s t Baa k L q 2000 2000 e. O i1.� 0 0 .� m� Art stood adjourned. I_ gyp` MAYOR d - —— amity — er � I � k I r I 3 I I II� h t� T I 1' ., ^JrJvQ AIN � Meridian City Hall ,,,____� __ J. -I- �� r aAQlyli.11G GIC111 01 Cues lilty recorasl was ;iiscus$ed, The Motion was made �y W. D. Skiver and seconded by M�rvin Bodin that the proposal of 5194-50.00 presented by Smith, Bailey and Hanson a acce d—as a proposal to audit the records of the City of Meridian for the 19? records. Motion passed: Skiver, yea; Rasmussen, yea; Bodine, yea. Water meters will be requi ed fo each unit, There was originally 1" li a for a sing a un ns a e eat lot. it was stated by the Counci that tonne tions to the water m ins n the street should be of adequat size to su ply the occupan s a e os o eeve— oar: ,a The Mayor stated tha the ork's Suptt. should be con acte to g t additional street hater connect ons s ffici nt to han a thea io nee a ow, it Gary Smith. represen inM adow iew Subdivision #]� s r sent o explain the need to present an ended Platt of this Subdivision ue t a c nge o =e' ownership. This doe not han a the original platt awin s, o y the back �g' of the hard copy. The Motion was made y W. . Ski er and seconded by Marvin Bodin that the certificate of owner hi b Chan ed and that the amended att o Meadow View Subdivision #1 be ap roved. r'> Rasmussen, yea; Bod e, ea. Motion passed: Skive , yea; Mr Skiver read from the z ni_ inutes concernin th res rvi of a lot for future roadway acces by a plain ng that J U -B Engine rs a mitted that they V had been in error in not cervi this lot. � They are wil in t buy this V lot if necessary. Mr. Johnson presente alte nate roposals that pointe up he pr babilityz° that this lot would of be neede for future access. In f ct th retention `a of this lot might be more ostl to the developer tha oth r sol tions,`` The Commission reco ende that he City release the of r tents n requirement for this Subdivision — — s. The Motion was made y W. .Ski er and seconded by M ruin Bo a' lot that was to be r sere for a. future roadway be r leas d in he Meadow View Subdivision #1._ ._ a Jerry Lofgren of Ame scan anvil Life presented ani uran a pro sal for cancer coverage, a oup an e Ci -y 6 to ees— 'T p Y Zo en e� p a ne ' that many political nsti tions in Idaho have this c vera e. a School s r c ava a Ie o i This policy covers o e person o or n v emp oyees in er the whole family: an, $3.80 for family per mont:, The Mayor stated tha he uld present this to the se do eads ho would e e e City as any other insuran a po icy p posal. The Drake Plumbing a d He ting Company has presented bil of 19575.9 for the -digester repair hat as ac om lished last summer s bil and the one of $4,538,50 prc*,rat d ca sed t e digester repai'v to ost ver $ 6 114.4 . because there were s me o her miscellaneous char es, �;y a The nrononni of n„Ai _ �� r aAQlyli.11G GIC111 01 Cues lilty recorasl was ;iiscus$ed, The Motion was made �y W. D. Skiver and seconded by M�rvin Bodin that the proposal of 5194-50.00 presented by Smith, Bailey and Hanson a acce d—as a proposal to audit the records of the City of Meridian for the 19? records. Motion passed: Skiver, yea; Rasmussen, yea; Bodine, yea. 0 Meridian City Nall Sumner Johnson spokelto tie Cc .'o V S 1. ud e3e it concerning the m -several times reques )adow View Subdivisio presented drawings s area, �7 ing and Z later act onded September 2,, 1974 Test4n&mg in the a right of gray to n state ways to I to the Planning and Cow Lcil. Ds kiver that the n $ $O the Owen Fr oe sio for heir ��,yea; N varro. yea. Ric Orton continued ain th the crater proposal forItheitud to explain the hater de nd, ire d wand and irrigation heir relation to the total• ro am Ne xlas ed that durin the fs the fire demand rill be 'gher than 11 the rest; then to ll exceed all the others duri the ext 1 ears. This then rr be more advisable to put in one wa er system than one for irr gats n and one for drinking water. Short term meann wer e son t to elve the problem for next • eai , It was outimate-d thatthe Beds ould require $100, .00 ora new well with lines to bring crater back o the resent tower. It was re ommen ed b the Engineer Sumner Johnson to aband n Well #29 #3 and #5 and Qep Well #6 because of higher wa er quality than the other hells. It was suggested thata r poral be esented to the ext ounci meeting to get this started edi telt' th the City Clerk a Fi nce O ficer to develop means of finance. The Motion was made y Ke eth Rasmussen and seconded by M vin dine that u a e aw ngs an spec ca -o—ns--f—or a neer well by the re lar ounci meeting, October 7t , 19 4. Motion passed: Skive , yea; Rasmussen, yea, Dod.ne, sea; N varro, yea. The next discussion as th rate structure that has b on p esent d to the ounce en. — — Mr. Johnson stated t t a®rate increase will yield ccum ated capital that can be used in raterting and to reduce t e to alt t might be needed in the Ron i project. Mayor felt that he rease is higher than hes roue ing toy. The City Council was insty the Mayor to study the rate schedule nruce Stuart stated hat hb is hhvinm problems with f<nces and g dens being placed on the 0ower aseme is and it is getting almo t.im ssible o ge o e man os to ake r pairs, He eras instructed that an aseme t is provided for coo k access d he should e able to get his j b don Mr. Stuart is to con act t e Cit Att ne and then cnta the people to inform them�hohas t a rig t to et his job done, then go shead causing as ba n1n There being no other business to coxae before the Council the meeting stood adjourned. attest: City Clerk MAYOR VAN Qubalvislon &Sete S ® . The proposal had been pre erste Me Owen cos an s rom e Mr. Johnson explained further pro v i da access o an - In The Mayor stated tha this pro Zoning Commission fo their re The Notion was made by Johm Na mmat$t er of an access rom the N. land be referred back to t e P; recommendation to th Co it Motion passed: Skive _ v1 .'o V S 1. ud e3e it concerning the m -several times reques )adow View Subdivisio presented drawings s area, �7 ing and Z later act onded September 2,, 1974 Test4n&mg in the a right of gray to n state ways to I to the Planning and Cow Lcil. Ds kiver that the n $ $O the Owen Fr oe sio for heir ��,yea; N varro. yea. Ric Orton continued ain th the crater proposal forItheitud to explain the hater de nd, ire d wand and irrigation heir relation to the total• ro am Ne xlas ed that durin the fs the fire demand rill be 'gher than 11 the rest; then to ll exceed all the others duri the ext 1 ears. This then rr be more advisable to put in one wa er system than one for irr gats n and one for drinking water. Short term meann wer e son t to elve the problem for next • eai , It was outimate-d thatthe Beds ould require $100, .00 ora new well with lines to bring crater back o the resent tower. It was re ommen ed b the Engineer Sumner Johnson to aband n Well #29 #3 and #5 and Qep Well #6 because of higher wa er quality than the other hells. It was suggested thata r poral be esented to the ext ounci meeting to get this started edi telt' th the City Clerk a Fi nce O ficer to develop means of finance. The Motion was made y Ke eth Rasmussen and seconded by M vin dine that u a e aw ngs an spec ca -o—ns--f—or a neer well by the re lar ounci meeting, October 7t , 19 4. Motion passed: Skive , yea; Rasmussen, yea, Dod.ne, sea; N varro, yea. The next discussion as th rate structure that has b on p esent d to the ounce en. — — Mr. Johnson stated t t a®rate increase will yield ccum ated capital that can be used in raterting and to reduce t e to alt t might be needed in the Ron i project. Mayor felt that he rease is higher than hes roue ing toy. The City Council was insty the Mayor to study the rate schedule nruce Stuart stated hat hb is hhvinm problems with f<nces and g dens being placed on the 0ower aseme is and it is getting almo t.im ssible o ge o e man os to ake r pairs, He eras instructed that an aseme t is provided for coo k access d he should e able to get his j b don Mr. Stuart is to con act t e Cit Att ne and then cnta the people to inform them�hohas t a rig t to et his job done, then go shead causing as ba n1n There being no other business to coxae before the Council the meeting stood adjourned. attest: City Clerk MAYOR City C o&' , AIAMURI q� fl 0 S uaq t anz ou I �gZ fico I� ti —19��� GC9 9 p a.fii %%c ?Cr ��'r1 tnj) ti,® 20 o n oo r',?,uc tc him t cfi?o� l: @��`e h the N dcZ�2p Surplus � � v �c�"e B Colone! +M' � found that lal It uas also ems. s31�a0&.E'?cJ1 that the J-DI Ay�V Shou Pest P000s �- p r fi ,`ivA� l� pyo �i C ou t �aj� a �o p o 11 and E avG '�,li � noc6ss� y F)h ait s I I @1-011 PKT4�G-� I l 7� e — ----� � r, State a�nd `4; �('� O EiJs�u; ©v g� jay��o � © U1112 ;i _� 9®'10� CIO LID .�®o �57�'O, �'l,` .p`tJ�aci�l�,''t i' adL-quato j? a nmoouncod t ha." @3a Lo �y. � Can b �-I Cost 500® loin a t--"CTC l.oac?4 "i'a ,�.�e is about y�c7�� ® � O P 11 _ qr, _ uatte @�a@ not ros®`� ��7ed �r�oaysc utl?,g pop-ey p� �� ®lo rte_. �%4.=� I11 15 -) , r--rJ �L � � O _I ��-- �. JJ �o�Z Poq+�.�sto�lJl u® lig+_`( �0ul �.I�'®K ttccess o_ b l7 aho I�jAw C6f1 ' s`��: c`"1.. �,'`?®L on, i ®L?«`a S J`� X11 'j` J1n AAqq � Q y'o E'a'Gi70os CIO the P- od t�1a� lot ✓1ccQoso t110 0( O C tt l lt 0 a 7Ci by the city had boar-alo eId a—nd that Moro %11WO O'�atccl t bar lie i3l c thL% 0of Cc©per� Lirloa on & l3o r �� ,his 6oveo ruoQ��' ctL? i ghat 'Lip l 0`; �eo� sh,0,-Ljj eapprove I be `'�' c t� he re _ 10t. and aseyvodo — 1122-7v' 1 Dock 1 ,lo ct atad tl-..a he a 1 oye nood to bo inn C, C, �< t? D a i'1. s �l o 1 r,� �. ,, d@ d`� @9i Y `� a"s`Yo 'l to CI O' t 1 020L 0o aF?eII,a, MaX! v`? 3 D0 �?`ipo p'av fin c°0`a�3nci Cagy `TEaSt"'�10��G' �91i,Zbo c�417��00 C�(clC"�fijQ CI t7ol®5�' c: --- ` 1!0 l�ar`7 thekJ.��%J �Cr! r ,d Vii_ a ion — to Cp`�I�Cptic)-n `bo Water a ��a nal Pic'-YOE, U5�+�Z: � the , ! rCO tho cit? ao 00`� uc�`�h -H --L7-" -fig, 1 l0` `T 0 } 10�C1_l�a V(Dietlrua��r _ par, lar-S avea 7 ®,0 7 -T-4'00. ROP-110-7- 620 U-1 c P-, he ol s ce i1)11150.00 •" o-. cls -Thr It e e` ccep I'eco r-'2osoc? o SkI.Vo,- , yep., Rasmussen, yea-, ®c.L .�B- N�' o��aS�LE-Ie}3t, 0��' i p l 4' @'✓! ��3 -L:' 1 op- u�� .�G� 9 F� $ a an, e: a �� w" i�i0' �J--I v a far'sJehez, 1'0 coille 09p!Ie tC���� City C o&' , AIAMURI Meridian City Hall August 5. 1974 Ben Drake Construction receive payment for Well #7 Motor intheamount of $ 49057.78. Motion passed: Skiver, yea; Rasmussen, yea; Bodine, yea; Navarro, yea. Meeting called to order by the Mayor, Don M. StoreyFT Councilmen present: W. D Skiver; Kenneth Rasmussen Mar n Bod ne; o John-'zge ralda` Others present: B e St rt; Gone Crawford; Ralph funte ; Gary Green; - Lar v Scarborough; Vernon Schoen; At tein• UB Engineers,,. Ric rd Miller and Ric Orton; Don R berts; Owen Frost; Da nd Bo_ n - Do_n Rowes• erbe t Ma r ACRD: Al arsd n; To Downing; William Ho oll a d Att rney _ d,_.Gre-ene Ben Drake - =- -_---- --Ric Councilman Skiver ex3resseld sym thy on behalf of th Council to Mayor Storey regarding ss ohis aE. Minutes of previous eeti g read and approved. Herb,Mayer, represen he Ad County Highway Dist ict, poke the proposed project of ro C err Lane from Linde Roa to II. . Highway 30. Mr. Mayer informed t e Mayor an Council that road 1, —plars, a draft environ- -mental statement are available or public inspection and that a public hearing will be held at the erid: an Hi h School, :00 peme epte er 9, 1974. Notice of heari fi ed with sked th se minutes. Mayor and Councilmen to m ke some kind of pros ntat n as o desires,' - - k Richard Miller, J U Eng eer, reported on design o Cherry improvement an stated ha proj ct w u s art 9 - o acqu a one g -o -wgy o and Construction in 976. Attorney Richard Greener, repro eating William Howell of lowaill Investments, requested a dif-f-e—ren zon clasarication o -2 th&L tha-1 reque9ted In the initial filing. Pres nt zone is D-1. -Request was preeV di y e e cause of the des re an - n -- -- of Mr. Horsell at thi tim is to obtain a C-2 Classification and use the an in tali na ure of a uc ey s to seg l --Property for a rest. from freeway and adj cent roads Green r that they wo d. —f obtain approval. W. D. Skiver n ormed Mr. and reec mmendation o the Planning and Zoning Commission. Howell Investments — - td11 re- it an ere p aced da for Augustee , Although N.A.N. INC., Mea ow Vi w Subdivision, was p aced on thl Agenda they were not repro ente Reference was made to the le er s o - the Mayor and Count 1 sig ed by Stan McDonald, Exet. Vice Presi eat, cr c rangComm ss on. -- — --____- Mayor Store felt t y y t it caul was their advantage to �F g Ppea� and ettle, fail r-e-too so ma I a s p order to be issuedo Change Order No. 4 n Wel_ #7 r commended by Sumner Johns n, JUE Engineers, was presented: Del to l squa a yards of 3/411 minu cru hod grave at` - $lam per Square Ya d, to aling�$140.00. Accepted y Bon Drake Construction and to be signed by Mayor Storey and City Clerk, Herald Cox. I Payment to Ben Dr ak Cons ructi n for all but 2,500 00 r Wel lotor was approved and to be pa'd imm diately. The Motion was made by Jo Na v ro and seconded by arvi Bodi a that the �4­ Ci k aru-_�fp ..f` "IC1 [1/1 ur 11 -a 1_3 4.U -.L . . Ben Drake Construction receive payment for Well #7 Motor intheamount of $ 49057.78. Motion passed: Skiver, yea; Rasmussen, yea; Bodine, yea; Navarro, yea. ak; , �l. I _— _ �,7f�'s' � ���� �� u: �• Vit=";�. ,�C, A RoU(`34 fir, r � pt:'i — a a 7 Ci 7 n l�! f:3�_ 1st s7Ica c Ca •�h-) ___•. 1 _�i-1.�r7�J C3i'u?% � —� 2's:' =�� I f e r �', � t, , ,. i r ,�1'��c91-�(';Fl r,_r,}ir� C° i_�;�Tr C'��as�r-�•��_h r� LOW (j ! hil l�:`? y _ I l Unt t 11011 t 7 •ta:t" ja I nJ1-'ia Ov1.ter s Av ;k t>;! ;;VIC Citi ® Heridl 4 -: oo June 3, 1974 apot problem area water line ins�allations); due to t e fact that the whole FT09rem Banner would involv_e soma participation at pe haps cI(Yiol rzthor than 50 or MIA only M has granted monies for rural type water and sewor prob) cos oz the bas -1 a Iof 5T;; matching fun z for elgibloportions of -e pro' N.?. Ronald Fall stated that 1 1/2 million dollars is ore han the total monies available to Consequently, heslyshou-1d__ prepare and present c valici case %a needs of EDA must shoo emplaWent needs of people in oi-der to receive Im-ve not been presented as yet. If presented it will receive consideration. ThaTia are other projects presentad from other parts oe statel our propocal i-yould be vaAghod n its merits along with of ear pjoject The a0eding implo::d r nev and adequate service are he So th Nini-r-101-1.0 ve _R a ,the Past part, Old W rld A ta. K?. Hall stated that Lthe ity� a uld present reports ;o mr. Myla der to co"midarations . T17o Mayor stated furither t� have needs and ara the Paste.t growin,", .S�a t an a he d by I -0- Me s at t Nr. Hall stated further that an vening All ')(D he d by he M)A meeting, t _r, ZTMdz and answor questions 0 fe 0 1 application is aacessar at thio tune. I area _6 t a f Ric Orton asked cone rnin, tthe_rPma involved it then; areas noodin!3 and further that thea local match money'3ds ng money nods to be ar�i arai able able at ft, thz_ the Mmin y;bn Pmn P, Ek The Wavn7�, ntated I- Ana 2 so being included,, included,, oncoossgul tydit%lout, t a uhole pro Gone Crmugo?d QxDlaited th Snmn2 Youkh ,Tnb PpopOl ram J pervisioao Tho pay , L a 1 aked th nk thnna vas to the City no c at CO-4311-houb cn'a kQ_Ims, ger week baslla� 1� a in; z nr -r BL n anne m Hr. Crau%?aTd stated hat a plication Youth: is mado to the S -ate :'D theS -1 ate _7ar umar r1uplo'lp" eat office c Th.r. is about X1200 vers 00,001 avail tn 20 a ible in this fund for this oumeE t -or Youth Opployment in ida C04nty,_ Xf the City can use nd am loy any youth for the summr9 ? this ts otld ba Gary Smith of JUB Engineerp came before the Council to state that; Hoadow View Subdivial on #1 to Me ds clarification ® and con-c-d—Ptual approval' got vateT across adou View 02 to provide ua4�4e7 to Subdivisic n k%. He stated that =propioalin-Uolves he concept of a water lin to f llot-] across Meadow na YI 8th Street to the involved:Subdi ision" I-laridian City Fiala o50 Juno 3. 197k, �.':Oho Hotia-VI Mads BY w. 0. Ski es, and secondo�dby K Yl Ra,AsmusGcn that e'� e-, t"ha City approve accept th a L to onceptual plan to PNpose a 101, t -"at Pr PO_ so jimo to wztond ft'oa S-;Tett 14 _0 c) ea Vi ea ow View - ---------- Notioa, passod g Skive a yea, Yc smussez a Rasmussen, yea- Bodine, Bo ne 0 a-, 14 t I varro, yca... Meridian _ City Nall - Special Meeting Meadow it w et•J Snbdivis _on:T7 'The Motion was Made by Wo sioa til be to [epte ®" tJater line is to follctr of Meridian Manor Su T divi connected at 8th Str..et a°- City to participate 1n th p a 1011 Crater line by tater t _e G ty is to bear `he c t1_ °ough she Sub_d_i visci on and ? ns a ® a�1° t°Jate�� lin 04 0 _ D. Skiver and seconded 4byK,-ith by tie Ci•�y arith thesefie�tions the .configta �ation o7 ion #� ti�rom the point there thei costs; these costs bane size difference between hook_ credits at time of st dif=feve nt-2a`� beGwer en a �' along Linder where a 10" --- o November 8, 1973 I)llis ,hat Meadot•rviet•JSubdivi that a ree; to t e Fist line the 0" tr line is t be Vonsidc,red for the a EV" tratckr line and ruturc develo Ment- and I al0" thater 1i nQ rater line is to be placed -- -- ; �� _— I PP Motion passed: Skive —,ye Ellis, yea; Bodine, yea; NavarPo, yea- P r'here being no other[ adjourned. busin,ess Col coneun, before the Coil tb_e mee"ing stood P rm attests MAYOR � ,. City Clerk, _ Sx I� o Meridian City Hall .3o of water lines that are November 5. 1973 The Mayor brought up -then... the matter of water lines that are to be located near per, services to land beyond tis in ch might e �Meru U-ney snould be developed at s line should be 1011 to properly distrib.1te Be Urge V) supply me feI turr time. diam6ter, Or larger. Us water through -'Triese are certain areas The City needs these tyhere largGr this sizes the systems. VRaere these areas exist, the City needs direction as to th(, mea of getting the developer to install trith the minimum needed the in size the Subdivision needed by the City which is m3st ind n cte t to domply only ij'a 611 diameter E—L20. The que-s-t-EcH the line size required abcve —then the arises as to Rho­fa`y3 61, that will satisfyfire for the d-Aiference f 0 rder, u_der,!�iters in in _ Also, brought up at pipe and materials to this time sub was contractors the problems the Ci,ry in Subdivision hag; in furnishing levelo�pment who take much time to pay or i I Yho faff-to—pay. I Sumner Johnson stated cash basis and not laid that dctm materials until furnished-b—yThe paid. City shoulc be on to 1,11. Johnson stated that - system's flow should lines invo laid at the interest of the City to enlarge the as long ElLs the e the City in a cost sharing Mubdivision is contiguous Subdivision,. with the City system and li.'Ies are wit in a platted I The lines that rme not of the deveLO—Par; and adjacent should --tite­ this be felt �and the to the City and would d be treated as laid at their expense hflibsa . __Bu tMdZ370:1-0 the eity should-nnut City could give credit requ re a cap frog lines *d i 4� a the tu tcTezt— in ''der tc discourp,,,re P I LUA %.10 - - I - - � X #,W CLU WA.Lizi or the amount in - - - - - - - - - - LIA_atea� development of 12ine s- ze dITse ffitit l Mr. Johnson stated that for lots he TaR felt so much per to In that the Cit v should thisarea. aarti-ipate in oversize lines but it remained not finances could bear the this responsibility additional of the City cost. -o as,ortain whether or For clarification it eras explai ed that across undeveloppoi land -he Subdivider stand the cost at their at the line size diffence expense in hoo_-up trith possible consideration exchanges when developed of C-.,.ty as participation a Joint ventura to get the water line back tote system. The City could share vr1thin the limits of the cost the Subdivision. diffential between a 611 line and a 1011 line These Subdivisions were di cussed as to amounts of financial partidipition by the City: Within the Platte. Sni -b d -i -A a I en - - om CAty to Subdivision Cresttjood Subdi I ision 2v500.00 7,000-00 --Ta-di--S-ub. kinald 3 esI as 50 per Ing ft. 2,DlOOXO Meridian Manor is phase 19900.00 wo get -6 0 VJ311 Meadow View --- I lla7C UrO 2,835-00 &050f,00 8.400.00 W080X0 00 Paid back when levelopad in hook-up at some , ture UTAO', Meridian City Hall h adjacent properties also, that their The Motion was made Mot Motion ado wasmade m W_ y W. y D. Sk Sk er and s( er and seconded by Marvin Bodin'.. ;odiTnt proposa presen e p=osae=sen Pr e I i y y su I on ng onsu tin -g -Mg -3 --neer be acceprea Dy Xne Councill Wlthinh the PlatWa n 1Wo­arTjJ-;y to__5_U6CLV1U1On Subdivision Crestwood Subdirision $ 2o5OO,,00 $ 7o000-00 -es- - Tedi Sub. Unc I F2 C ng 2,100100 3.150 Paz ft. Meridian Manor a 1st 1Kase 11900,100 re . o3 5 -GG - 0 get -t -0 -me -11-- Yfea ow-TTLCJ UJI,�Wevu— 70 00 1 V g TZ97100-00 fl) —Pa. -.d back in -Fo—ok-up wh n developed at so e future time. Motion passed: Skiv r,, ye Ellis, yea-, B-offi—.ne,_yea, Ta—varro. yea., Sumner Johnson repor ed t t We 1 Number 7 pump house and PUMP a.ecificatioa are about completed,, He eques ed that the —plans be appro. 7ed soTh-a-1157 �:Ls can be presented in the n ar fu ure,, In the matter of the building it was decided to recommend a f1t ted t a strucure in keeping vdtY--the 4uality of the surrounding subd risi n buildings and to not consider a meta st--ructur-o to realize a savings ine) ense 14z-,, Johnson also mentione that the lot on to be enlarged becau a Mr Cope moved the well further to he South on his l try �od_rill, —house secoxid- lot line,, Thi tri 1l cause the pump to be oo c1_a_s-9FT-o-t--F4-- The Mayor set a sp ,ting November 8th at 7:00 m, o canvas the ballots, V Also to be discussed will be th Cope matter of Well umbo 7. The Mayor 8'a e 0 Us. on ng Co pang desi-F-r—es o ow ny d5cisil-otir; 5 �:::::��:;atus of progress in the tier of Pete Cope who did not ccinplet the vall drilling, according opansa SD C3. 3 The Mayor presented n i pecti n letter (inclosed with th.se minutes) by the Idaho spare mens,0 a or 'or U.e State Insurance FubT;---- This,lists several t n clie U1 ng ings that need a ay to be done to correct instrue te-d-tKe--sec tion some h -a safety hazards -ft --- _T to correct these ite UO ems s o contact the Meridian s th Elec t are ixec- ric tc listed. by an electrician—, help with this problem, e r e a up a to She Christ Lutheran Prope ty to ated on Cherry Lane and ba king index Roads in_an a arcpl wa re wed. The minutes ofDecem annexation I butwas n ,� er 1972 indicate t f Oally annexed,, that this parcel The City attorne aro res ap roved for is t take the necessary steps to a nex his a ea in the near futur=e was agreed that t ,It a re ident properties adjacent to thi prop?rty an king Linder Road a CitYO It was also so b anne ed note that when to square up the ity the Lutheran Church 11mit crnnects Unes of the to viatez, and sewer it could cau hese ervices to be available to the resident adjacent properties also, • Meridian City Hall 020 October 1, 1973 The Meadow View Subdivision was next presented for NAN-Co4oration.r pli lots locatec along Under and Wast This Subdi ion con fists approximately ely� 0 8 -'L -h Street, The Mayor stated that this Subdivision has not produced thcl pr -ayment amount There was discussion of wells foi-drinking waterfor-J-ho C--'I.,;y- and vrays oi` _T�vms_.T,cund__tJia�� a— Ulf � money -inancing, way you go i amou. 'GO bene rawforc suggested —that -perhaps an LID coul- be- e I]Ff-o-- P1,110 C e the 11 _o money for wells and i,,ater -ines r a Subdivision. Tqie discussion centeled atund t e costs involved in -he dl-21f-fererce in costs of installing a lin --to --dili-Irc-T I-M±er on to S1.1 nnn _1 bn formed further beyond, All costs have increEsed fDr pip_, digging and laying The Motion was made ly MartTin Boline and seconded by I-ohn Navarro that the I-- ' Meadow View Plat be ableden=g more concrete doeJUono as to what is to done one in elation to delivery i � of water to this Sub 11' ivis! I on, Motion passed: ISkive-, yea; Ellis, yea-, Bodine, yea; Navario yea, mer aianjsa�xoi,, jTas nr-m*�. a ticlLsseq. The Zoning Co'mmissior. had sked he question as to what w s to bc dono with �eirao_utl-t-Uhtit lay n --- Xt--to C ex -C ry lane an �,,s uno a - Tle 1111ot-ion was made F_y_J­o4 Nava rroand secan-66-d-E-y Marvzri Bodinc that this matter be tabled until the Subdivider explains what in to be don c with tho I unplatteananw-�T water delivery is eciuiied d id d T Motion passed: a grate -,"rr Skiver, ?, Ellis, yea, Bodine, yea; Navao, yca. Tecli Subdivision was next �resenced, _110mat-ter —of water delivery for l thisSubdivisionSubd -iv-i-s io-n-ha-s- -stiff l not been resolved I in relation to the size of1water1line and costs invol,ed, IIt was pointed out b thos� p es6ntproposals have been prsentee, piecemeal,, T is requires the Planning Commi�sion and Council to _vevbw again and again proposals that are psesent d. The Mayor stated tha1Planing adZoning perhaps shomld hold up proposals � - I---- __ Li_ ung il_Yfl the questi -Ons rl�a—lsed re answered to them, This way ihe plans. would be acted on only t once beca se all the problems Fe a4swerk before ci Zoning , LT-ia _F1_afo_rp_iigh raise to e members o He0jmissi6i and stateff- that the Planning and Zoning Comission is hard working n doing a lino job e Cit -y-_ cil-shoo ld present M Withmir�ec tions and planning goals so that they can unction as they would lik� to do in a manner feeling _0 11the j�un__ c t_`Ehat all Sub s should V5 fully aware of the costs t1fat tuntil y shoild bear in the utilities i;o thear Subdivisions t — hey desired the Cto participa atein any my vNey spreseyrGT their proposals acccri�panied by_pooper drawings for th6 Cou�cil to act, These should be presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission who would not present their proposal until they were satisfied concerning the arrangemento that the Council would approve, • Meridian City Hall a3- September 18, 1973 --- ---- - - - Mr. Johnson stated that it takes time to deliver: 3 week open the bids -and 3 month—toc­omplete the project. It c March 1974 before the weli coul� be delivery water for th Mr. Johnson asked for: i to bid. 10 days to ,IcL be as late as City.1 10 authority toini iate egotiations to_Croce _E,_d_for _ri and planni n" desiEn _bui�diq&__�o---houle--ohlor-inator tanks and p 3o call for a t ernate bid1concepts for exterior of Motion was made bye, D.-$kiverFand seconded by Marvin Bo -consulting Engineer ,,be ex-�ended authorny to _=proceed frith and securing of rights-of�way, i Motion passed: bKIVOr, ye�-, Bodine, yea; Navarro, yea, The Motion was made I by W D.- Ski - verand-seconded by arvinj I Bod ------building be de-s-ignedl, now to house the chlorinater if - needed at Motion passed: iSkiver, yea; Bodine, yea; Njavar o y' The Motion was made by W.!D. Skiver and seconded by 4ohn I or alternate bids -b'o--pr--e-F-,-e-nt-e-cTi:i- or the ecxUer-io--rof­�He---U-i a decision of the best economics of progress. -of -way that the s=and specifications ine that the a later time, varrolthat the call 1cTi­ngFt-o-­a­II-6-w for— Motionpassed: 'Skiver, yea; Bodine, yea; Navarro, yeln. I Gary Smith came before the Council to request participation of the City in --F-tY6---,Ti-ffe—renc-e-be-twleen the costs of t--he--l--ar-g---e-r--s-l�z--e-c'. Vine -0 -in-Oie-Me-a-d-ow Vie -w -F ­ Subdivision, He felt that in reprpsenting the developer the larger lineL9 wereito deliver water to additional land to be aeveloped beyondtheirareaj'and � would be iair for the City taparticipate, f Mr- JAnsonsGted that cities participate in a I siles ove-�-61-1­because - a �11 line fills all �he requirements of fire control The Motion was made by John Navarro and seconded by Marvin Bodine that the City have Gar Smith negotiate with the bidders to come up with �n approximate amount of cost on a contract basis for the __City�_to s udy theyip� size difference of -cost, Motion passed: Skiver, yea; Bodine, yea; Navarro, yeae MAYOR W/,,, 4 " a, � � NoTidian City Fal o2a Sentombo- 10_ IPP-) The City Attorney was instructed t® contact Mr, RiddlOmoser to inorm 14r0 Crouse that he should fill out the proper application with the City and thew go before the City Council to request a letter of certification fop population increase to be lodged in his bel-matI o Pf11'''o Skiver read a le'vl er from om SY2F±?nor J011- GOi7A, Consu tiLng, 'r_rI_g! £ ceT a oott i ng O!' Uh con, o conflicts Mid lie was awa- re of with these D rdina. suggestions aces of Subdivision rcqu-? z clmon` o, and that he t - m- prepar-od I 11?. 4,Zith o atadrcoo ,duce`x? to `"hoso itO s, Mr, .Smith requested variance to a G0 `�r o®�; right -o -'-way w1 uhichhoul I th the right-of-way Sltn 111e2 d be approved by I the I�d.a th l°1c �t 8th Sta oot Cot��hty �? g1huay District, then ho at ted, h, coup come before the Zoning C'c mmissf",On to n swot Pahe letter or Mr, JoIffiaon' I lPio Motion was made Iy Isubdivinion of Mo n idjL to al` ou 60 foot wid`}h w Ma of 0o Ski or ;d�be er and seconded by K('�it �i�l�;s yhnny `she allowed a na.riancl1 f rOTA the Qity ordin.an.ce %AUh 41 foot back iso bac l: o`� cullbs, street �- Not - ion passed- Skive:?, yea; Ellis, yen-, Bodine, yca a �Navarlo, yew, Allen Jones, representing "U31, came before the Counci 1 to ii egaaesi� direction �f concerning the chlori that two tanks would natic- be re at tae uired noir well and locat-ion e_I samo, t 7,120 gallons each,,, he GtatcLl These two taii2m would cost appro:cimatoly i�3 X00000000 t'ir, ljonesalso etntoc that the pihouse would Cost ap � proximately fS30vOCO 0, P,7 this time the Playor d ecie.ed that t1 reinew tr th the Engi loors o rev=+ ou of °nyoIV Well k7 should be cot asi cio d, f®r latcr eempletc ITho Mayor suggestod �_spsclal ?eating with the condor io-d Brginoe*�a in the ncozJ z'attt?ret9rl.s Co O�i'jae � Sumner johnson to Ell J represented by Cary "mithu the M j 3371 C0 Meadow Vied . tabdi isioa c€no up for di scudo s on in rela tad a to req s? o % for City participation in t a r er lino nstall ration, The City requires `lamer lines in a Su�)d.iv`i� ion t1�� they '°cCl t aoy `d'his FIs land beyond. the SLAbc�-7 to - isio_ D,rovid bein a line large OnouCh developed, to p �Ovldo Irsa6c1: � "o� - - L --- Difference be c,�°�Qe�a a_ Ei'i' Si eren. between WI °O. Prue P�etwee. The letter indicated 10 � and 6B0 avl� that a l� �0 There P7 r' r lino `� r tela �e� .�s app_ '] mor r: qui h ed 1011 si zo line on e t���q:'se�v IT,11, i � 8th : � 0� Por foot,, troot- O`' 'J�J®.,'�`� A1➢ d ry `P - e t _' Ih `3 T..e -flow wallOita. _ Also a 1011 main tb�2ough `shy Subdivision to Linder e7ou d. be reguirsdt, This Subdivision k eqi s he Ci _ �y to participate in -h(-- s ze d a �''_ Orcnoo - - -- -- _-I®e ---- - --- �krF�_r that reQ2-t jr �3� - rl I The Mayor stated thal#ate x f:llfl_L'7_}'��Lir '{;'':�ZX��, Clui ro, ellpor+Siva for i hn Cl m,anne r0 tae City coa�ld olligato A letter was read. srL Jack i S4ai� alt tb %� ty to Rid.d i a` Q7)I -- at, thig_ matt; -, nc�oo�oa, ar-Ir -i 1� o?ara. I a1,1aC �✓ 3"�S R1 7, 717tXn- ,._,7 0 H0 rr0l- I! cit it E� iCI-It b c c on, o a -n olim in ? Sit i v?_„.-n,n sh_ir:+-n-n } In its mnno7o beyond th( ability tC repay, emoser requesting a Orli �c � eati in ®.,: �' it t r i j�®F??_et`�`? ®1 �L?` u�1 f' 1r> �i ® c Drink 'license `�` or th Frontier JoPun Fit2gerald, the City corti^ication by the GitVClark Opoc + f dally to re p c-, to onsus pysaro_n -V in! Orm@d fbe State 1©Y"1 i C ttornay, �ias Dounts,, T i c 7G' � �-i 1�o o� C'IVb a1C�cU tion`il i ql OT1' by ` ho t?b o stated that he did not- :, oel il:hat n ,sufficient under -f-,ho sTataatd that ap nnr However, the A �' U _� noy G-6-rie.i al I-- uor Eats En orcemen l Iq i an €add � tiO�+a�? licen.so can be issue([ VIs Te e the 'My Foals the popul a"p isin N diem o The City Attorney was instructed t® contact Mr, RiddlOmoser to inorm 14r0 Crouse that he should fill out the proper application with the City and thew go before the City Council to request a letter of certification fop population increase to be lodged in his bel-matI o W 110ridian City Hall The Payor announced he Me]cidoij Vieu Subdivision :1-nrl `-AG no''P, Regional Environmental Sul t _ICI�I!'i ------- �havo �Io-cc�ois oJ. ET.Tprova:'L,%rL)La Ir for their Subdivisi3ns aLss-joy"oi t� le g!� o yo(jol. _. 0 t Bids -fez1970 Cleve 1T",'4l0X0 by Bill �117exe 1-L cpened, Vincer ahs Bids were: t 15267025 by Bol I 4 Moclinitz _ bd uc sold, the to B -ill R. Vipcont,, -I tho aMoV _T1 "lo Go- uas docidorl -%ohighe and tho 1970 Cllovrirol wa,, Bids -a Sub Pun Dotty 1-73!'o no badly 11-17no PliT-Tibing Plvnbi�,, bicl- -p 'Foy- that -1, ;?--' Uell 1,13 wore di sots o A lI would J0 -too orpensi 0 to- ks pro:'Ont- prir -p cnEl' ropni7''. B I 7,r Mot ion was n ade 1�)y V. Be Sleo ow pury vee and seconded by I 5 in Well #5 from Fa �ith hil i a I'to low bicldlr^:,,, _0 p I p comp-Ini in t1lo y be q.ccap-u ed to plea— ce amount of 11�1'435.00 '-he 110t on passed- l Skivcr, yea; Elliag yea Bodine, permit for Dz(,0 Valent -11 1)31"ty 01-MG2,30 this buildirge'L2 yea-, Favar 00 yon;., at :i j02 Ei jo.*C, w�g A request for a condi"Cion tiOn GiG-1157 �by �_o2 �2_1c)joiniyijr Crl!-7Atod for -a Don tisj,!; offica 1 Use in The Planning and Zon--ining -Ovided Commission had suggested oppr—oval f " Or T�r the, i n 'rp Hotion passed- lSk`dv 29 ye yeal Bodine, yon tin®0 ycn� l i l A letter vyas Z"Oad xft'c ra npj —Zoni'J? 6Fc—mmisIsion Tho Havor acro-ptcd tl' Robilort G letter -tcc Gl_�aisyor O'L eubnitting his rosi J7nation from i-110 dua 'C'ro his novin�-, " , i tho City cf_ _" —nn'. resirnati-n w on vice on the Commissi to serve to fill the MC o'''obo_-�o GlaimTc7. to Complete the -U 0-,.' Rob Glais rng- Con, mission, to serve until Docc� b - —�l -1 l J -- l J I Glaxsya�'? _'Por his 1, Pro sldlvol':� s ug ted 10 T',',io Va Or t] !ion appoJ C y as ocTabor, of tho 7la_�'_ Vng The Council cnnfirnoc� thi'_ r1q., Nay1'0'adl OvdinElncO- �242 TOTAL AIZOwn or ii i\T--',Y ME TAXABLE POPE. TY B11GINN ING JAIF_C.TU__ ARY 1, oval s- "z1ost and Z - a POIntment ens; NEEESSARY MRIN 1973, To, ( - AN ORDINANCE, S ING ,CRTTH THE TO BE RATS EDI FPOJJ rNX-E-- 01,T THE CITY. OF MIFPIDLEAPT THTE YE ARID ENDRNG DECE5MM13 31, l 1973)o �Psoe vj� 'o - Od C1 all rules roquipin thn c7dl�ancco be jonggocj jjj:�qj aniLj 155 L L MG 0 O'd was mad—el uy rules and Provisions of 5C-902 Ic 0 Ui ys p2ssod and - 7_r H0,%`d ori Passed o Skivc-!:'g yea,- Ellis, yea; Bodinn]yo you There was discussion concerning the continuation of t e eff rt to,proceed faith the census. Mr. Cecil M. Leonard requeited a beer license for Riz2a Parlor he is planning to build at the N rth cve of East lst Stre t. The City Attorney stated tat thl population measure ee of a'beer license can be ante on population growth estimat it Council Athat e Mayor stated that he ows the town has grown and c d be done 1but be did not want ft set A—nr A MOW It was stated further that the license could be issued with the r servation e secured for specul tion purposes, The Mayor stated further that it is getting to the place where a iquor or beet• license becomes i3. valuable soluble asset, Letter, from Jack Kell dat d 28 read,This a to file th these minutes an std es thedepth of drilling d her nese plt�ng "Port and descri do f anal screendesign, tter of Jul 1 ac K or a partial payment to t e dri ler and requesting tkat these pa eats be _made for now Well ,< -PAge-1 (No. 64) $8523-27 retain 109 947.0 20% 1 , 91 75 . due at this time. The Motion was made by Keith Ells and seconded by Marvin.Bodine that the artial pMent be made to Kenneth Witt the drill n" Well �2 in tba mount of $119891.75• Motion passed: kivez,, gee Ellis, yea; Bodine, yea, umner Johnson explained a grid stem of.laying of mains f r delivery of iater in and around the City of leridian, e suggested that an 811 vat er line laid on- of Fairvi tw with a ie across for each 1 4 e or o. This would delive sly the e flow as a 10" li e. evelo er to furnish a japp"oxime e explained his lett r of June 8 1 r - ewer lion ecommendations. Thi is on file with these minutese W. 11. Skiver and aecondeedbg a u o ne -�- -- ity bear the difference in the water main installed a 6 and 4 L 8" line - , or onar Evani i for a ection of pipe along E. Fairview Avenue from the & & Roo Beer stand to Is restaurant comp2U.r ?Motion passed: kiveye a• Ellisyea; Bodine, 7eae Or dinanee #240 was read by the Mayor entitled: AN 0 NG AIM MIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND= LYING IN TEE = OF THE SWJ4 OF SECTION 1$ T. 3N. R 1log B ADA $i; COUNTY, ID 0, THE ITY OF MERIDIAN, DIET H PR PERTY IS ADJACENT AND CONTIG OUS THE ITY 0 ID A e Motion was made b W. I. Skiver and seconded b Ke th lis t t the rules and pro .s ons o Sec ion 0-902 d all rules requiri th t Or maces be. sad on three differe t da 40` as read ve passed and approved. Motion passed: Skiver, yea; Ellis, yea; Bodine, yea. Meridian City Hall rMM' a 4�,a #,'�,a " x r § d s s 4''s mk ¢e a u' ?✓S�k�r� t s € ow A'. F r a s ps 4 W r t� ��b k'� x F r �"+ P} _ �4i"ti a d. J�i� ,2f w: h 1k m 7 y` e{ z aN u tr gg nl­ 57 § s�q s t 2 tl The Mayor reteter from the NAN Corporation requ stin the o a parce wne y e y o e oom, w e exation It is the unng co carni y arepurc g this annexation th t th re is as ng. no wa er sersewer land aread co servi ists a for this landThe f approximately 21.4 acr so arantee,,or This land is arm up a mein at this time ted dent'al or an con to exation to aid in ro dway guous tothe City an is s. propo of to als and to be developed The a y a orney as ordinance of annexation o pu at s next or no ace of hearing and eeting. I-rovidc e i Old World Arts came p for disco sion; area located a the East end of Broadway. The water lines to b and �ewers o ava Permission has beenante is ava a e up ive be required to connect exte a e i e and ded b or for rain- pay t s or o the them from our lines to t em a as ame. drain field until such t'me At that time they wLders e required hook-up fee, charges. There will be a size of the lines in olve eir installation as ood t 'trio ( fire , a sewer lin® at they will ) hook-up control - equivalent wa e stand by charge according e as Sumner Johnson is to equivalent is ro er look set f nto this r 2 o matter to ascertain whether whether h' s should mi he hook-up Leonard Evans was pr Ju y , 1 7 is the sent o dis ate et fo uss his water and se er m tter. his building to be ompl ted. The water line is to that the A & W place connecYe-d through the through the trailer e as er Par , a pl cad a in front o Wheel Inn k a d Mr. i ong Fairview to his rope ty fr the line their propert . The ewer to be obile Park. This wi 1 ha e to be resolved Evans, The lift sta ion 's the property of _ Mr. Evans would like contribute to the la 'ng o kn w the o this amount of tic' C' line, _ ---Sumner Johnson is to 0 Mini -Mall of Paul Zat'ka i the tone Annexation. he It was announced that Spro. Mail areao Book -up charge nee to b resolved. %n -Sot represen ng 0 w Washington Street in the v cinit n comp ex ev opm n . o owns a parcel of p opert East 5th Street, pr sante Nort a pr of posed o ro Skiver, Chairman f th °P1 e Zoning Commission a of M hese zone minutes ar on ile 'th in and Zoning Commi sion y 29th, concerning t is m these minutes read ter. he minutes . Skiver stated tha 5th Stree needs to be extende for is to be imluroved with and sidewalkso The traffic; all land o be privat uture sphal alanc owth mat of the ly owned patterns o tKe or . s str et ccording to Ada stan ards with urbs oa waysare prova -e-d or 4.4-er 1 d maintained, n front of his prope ty M SCO t cross his propert tV c bs a d nto consideration th ava lability roval of h e will complete the orth 2 sidewalks. This o'ect of sewer and water and of W needs to 'll r quire shington take the rMM' a 4�,a #,'�,a " x r § d s s 4''s mk ¢e a u' ?✓S�k�r� t s € ow A'. F r a s ps 4 W r t� ��b k'� x F r �"+ P} _ �4i"ti a d. J�i� ,2f w: h 1k m 7 y` e{ z aN u tr gg nl­ 57 § s�q s t 2 tl V Meridian City Hall June 4, 1973 This land is already within the City and has been for many years The Motion tilos made :5-yW. . S 'ver and seconded by Eeith lis that the DEVC® Proposal at Wa5hingl,on and East 5th area be apyroved, subject to the installation o_orbs and gdtters, si_d__ewalks,_fh_'H_t East 5th Street be improved across this land area9 and that underground utili.ies be installed: that this property b acc pted nd approved according to the limitations of the Planning and-Zonind Commission. Motion passed: Skin r, ye4; Ellis. yea; Navarr . vea The Mayor mentioned that br. A. R. Neuenschwander had cont cted Dusiness concerns and indivi a s z communi-cy concernin a merical 5,21fatc. The property most su tabl is the property of Paul Pack at West *th Street and Qherry sane Frontage, Mr. McQueen re resen ing Mr. Pack had ap eared before the lanni Commission to request that a parcel consisting of 5 acres be changed to Commercial. The discus ion pointed ou that a Medicalc ii a Residential possibly by a conditional use permit with 75% approval of thes rounding The Mayor stated thaa r stet lan should be set u requests for annexat on f om th developer. The proposal by JUB Engineers presented by Sumner Johnson, repre enting u efie c eve op rs, as presented for North Gate ub visio No. , consisting of 37 lots. W. D. Skiver read from the minutes of the Planning ani Zoning Commission or May eq, 19V5 thes are on e with these minutes,, The Motion was made y W. D. S ver and seconded by the Ci y Att rney concerning the two 1;t accesses lot 318 and lot #28 f Bl ck 3, subject -- -- to approvalo un y Road- r and -for sewer and jaFe—rro the Health Department, and thE recc mendation of the Planning Idommission as set forth in their m e 1n of -1 , 1 j73s UhcT&rgrou ut a ties , curbs and sidewalks. Motion passed: ISkiver, ye4; Ellis, yea; Navarro, yeap The Motion was madey W1D Skaver and sec b o r that the Meadow View No. Ann xatio , presented by NAN, Inc., onsis ing of the whole Noteboom T acts_drawn by JUB Engineera, be nnex dac.-ording to the request ofth Dev loper whereby they recognize th t thisParcel is annexed with no gran ee of water and sewer use at thi3 time Mr. Skiver remarked hat 1 he Planning and Zoning Commissio4 is t > study the Platting r inance a t mpt t bring up to date soma of the to sizing an other discrepancies that seen tc be causing some question, Mr. Johnson,the Consulting Engi eer, recommended that land use a d platting ordinances should be kept separajte in the study to avoid furthericonfusion. The Chairman of the lane an ZoningCommission W D. kiver, read the minutes of the Commi cion, Marc 19, 1973, with the r quir ments that shoui� _ be met to qualify this pr posal.of the Meadow View Su diva ion b NAN, Inc.t the zone minutes are on file herewith. Bill Driscoll and,Je ry Safthof JUB Engineers explaUied t e pro ram of age d nairrigat on. Assurance wasgiven that these have bee drawn on the plan profiles a wilf be conformed to. S ' Mr. Driscoll stated hat ire h drants have been plac d4accordi to the f, Roger rof-Ups. Mr. Driscoll stated urthTmst understood that ss & pecifications must be approved by he S Department, Env oal a d Health Department and that Y ' rove his additi nal load oil the present plant facilities. -- The Mayor stated thatthe City s bard pressed by dev lope s des ring to connect to the City ter and sewer facilities. It s hi opinion that __ the City owed responiible actior for the land that is pres ntly annexed and would need sewer use These exed loads should be Donsi eyed first before annexing additional and areas. -e Mo on was made y w. S er and seconded y s a e recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission be a cepte as a requirement of these pla and hat Pis proposal, for the eadow View Subdivision plans a -spedificationffl be approved subject to the approval of the Health Depart int. Motion passed: Skiv r e Ellis yea; Bodine yea; Navar o„ yea Meridian City Hall ?;arch 269 1973 Special meeting called to order Dy the Mayor, Don M. Storey Councilmen present: W. D. Skiver; Keith Ellis; Marvi Bod ne; John Navarro tuar • Gene 'liner Jolu,Gar form n Fuller: Others present* SmDriscoll; Ray Peter Tom • 1 07 on; oger nderson, • D vid vers-, Jac KeFowler -;,Pa The Mayor noted that the A ua1 ppropriation Ordinance there were no object ons and t the budget. wasprepared - Ordinance #236 was r ad b j�th;Xor entitled: AN 0 KND PTION FOR ALL THE NECESS LIABILIT ES 0 Y OF MERIDIAN, ADA THE FISC YECING THE FIRST DAY AND ENDI G FIRST DAY OF DF•CEMBM ORDINANC BEIAS THE ANNUAL APPRO DINA CEM ING AN Y PENSE A OII , IDA 0, FOR F JA VARY, , , 1 3, IS RIAT ON BI L, ADECLARIN AN . The Motion was made y W. r and seconded by J rules and provisions of -902 and all rules requir3 read on three different days be dispensed with and that hn Navarro that the thaordi nces e Or inanc No. 236 as read be passed and approved, S er Ellis ea• Bodine ea Nava ro _��ea. Noti The Chairman of the lane an ZoningCommission W D. kiver, read the minutes of the Commi cion, Marc 19, 1973, with the r quir ments that shoui� _ be met to qualify this pr posal.of the Meadow View Su diva ion b NAN, Inc.t the zone minutes are on file herewith. Bill Driscoll and,Je ry Safthof JUB Engineers explaUied t e pro ram of age d nairrigat on. Assurance wasgiven that these have bee drawn on the plan profiles a wilf be conformed to. S ' Mr. Driscoll stated hat ire h drants have been plac d4accordi to the f, Roger rof-Ups. Mr. Driscoll stated urthTmst understood that ss & pecifications must be approved by he S Department, Env oal a d Health Department and that Y ' rove his additi nal load oil the present plant facilities. -- The Mayor stated thatthe City s bard pressed by dev lope s des ring to connect to the City ter and sewer facilities. It s hi opinion that __ the City owed responiible actior for the land that is pres ntly annexed and would need sewer use These exed loads should be Donsi eyed first before annexing additional and areas. -e Mo on was made y w. S er and seconded y s a e recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission be a cepte as a requirement of these pla and hat Pis proposal, for the eadow View Subdivision plans a -spedificationffl be approved subject to the approval of the Health Depart int. Motion passed: Skiv r e Ellis yea; Bodine yea; Navar o„ yea • 5. nn_�s .ate -- ----I __ �"A pl 22nn9 n'T U February 19. 1973• embers can convene on the 3�d or 4th M day of the month and be prepared to esent their findings to th Cit at t e Council on the 1st Monday f theMont . It was also discussed t members could arrive at 7:00 P M. an have to come up later. The re nese tativ s of the n exec tive session on the matters ograna to be presented Could be heard t 8:00 P.M. in an o i� .tom -tom he nr n session. This Could ntt _ Q$�e of Ig aep t a_Tommi cRi ®n- _hetet"=i fort _oi� kiting f o - expe-.ted bf the velo er a I is apprave Mr should.be required avI use—an—An. au Uio — 7.0 ntation i 0. thg om i n c when Brant t�nP of —__ —_ — ------P-----�--- �—��� Th next n I 1 --- - -- -- - - --- --- --- J test: � Chairman -- ssio� I --city 1 rk anning & Zoning Comm ffmann �'�ke mer Johnson A OG A a highway District A a Planning & Zoning City Minutes cc: P -- S -= _ - an Sub Faller Development _ j --ter G9erLly ---- teboom - NAN 0 r� Is 0 _ -_-_ toriaim ZoaiM and Planni -i❑ 3 Motion 'gas pasaeda All Ye development al®ni7e t Br_ ed7gv a duel®z dovel men , on - — — Au �roximgt®y 150 feet fron age_ b 2� f®st d®® e�: i o1 a t r : lre ad right of v, r,. lata ed _i the Oreo- of . - est. Bro = miff, :tO-- be davnlap d by. -. J rkina -� n jonkinn- - _ = e development Is to eon Ipri va a lend_ cd th_ private _ owned - r,. or ertment totals*_ Cho _ ti ne co struction, 2 droom wit le — — t was di u d th o hotz�i has a le ®_ for the t dcr®11®rs; that ider means of roadAarltrav 1 mho ld be considered. a tr ela for Minimum roadw .ys under the ordinm c � is I 60 -- - - — _ -- �- -__-- b f ra e to curb face The ®_ i a ._o be one street cut access for th®d veto meet ith_in�ern� roads = to s rvice the duplex®ee r -- ,this an should -go to the fir® hief .o consider street wi h fi .taction _ eonsi rations; w' I i -- ag �d®r1 the lroadt�a:yQ to!'�6° roade7als curb to (curb -d ace thong t There should be a-culd.esac �Urn Orr. _pr9v1d9d a.t the ext; i o mp—ent to 1 low _ �- cl vehie s_ t r _; r f err o i -- ®.deYeZop p took-.th� skotch Owing- _to- Arem ag d, 1 � later -time. I R Barry Hoffman end Robert Gl isyerlpre_sent d the pr �y kprQ oil he Crestwood subdivision_ th tankl n road and-frontin oh -lin' s Pr',P'3a. cea�gists off 53 iota* one acre__in-Anind vi du wat , _mLPPj34 P ® tic tars d 60 foot ®trpeta_.. 3 h_ --conformation nth. - ountyj Hi ® - xp fications of not less than e gavel surfaced _endi_ -- - 1 was I I Poi tem ®u--thatl _tbi s G a within thy, comp vq l�� - ndis shown as rivat%d utilities -- P — -- b in Varmitted• but_ that when !+,ham �:1tv ermn _-_- g__ ext_ nUng it -1 boundarisa _'thlc r es -v � _��u. � vaila lo. i -- I was thought thatcosid®r4tiozk.ton_e =nj i _-- t did fit .into the ple sed._ ea - Stat -e it- he- . I d vm d sooner or later develop) it in the moRt Ara r�8h— lA9r t,,. ?r dY n-, Ti 4Jr 1 ' e �I 1 u s, I" p a 11 -1 ( :r' 1 1 t' t ,I l� k f r,+ � II ,' p r c 4 ';I A Alrtie f foJ1, i' ( A n t >i a j"3 d SII r f j '.i / P ji,, r �'b II + I�'fi + t rr I h 4 19 1 f!y'�,¢in t.. 11 I� I b r , ,�y R W�u _Vtr l ;r� y r,� A 1 q i ,'.> , iI X ,�.% v. 1 i i rr:�,, 'd I a' I 1 ,e 1 .I/4 ' I{ i -� �, 'Fay Int �, lat., (� rr Af AI o{ ha r'f '" tt e ', 1 P , t a 1 ;, t a I +, t I +� l 11�.' � K* I r Y a a I a r I J I r I a .=1 d ro-ei li 1h� , 4 �' tY ' 'j i , , 1 EG r @ r �5 r I d d r{;, ! „ ! ' rAq,,.` " 9� ' A Ckl 1 d .i p'i ?k A', i e°. i, �r ,,, tit i'Y:if It I �',' Pyr! I '' I �„r �, t f �r{ r 1, , f yI C. t",, �Ihyf!.�yI � �I °� I�) t�+'i M �I a "' ,;a rf �dcl ' ,",ti (�,;.i�'ts { a" II' V :'.R I I. �. ti.,s r r al If''. x pr .:aj ,; °i 1 I} I f s, y d I:, . i , , I I j , d j { L a"I ' '�� I i'" t i' i p �e 4: !, 1,,,, ,� d N 4 t e '', , ''i , ,,, rll i 11 , j li,l;b 4 "VY I;�a (1 r rr'1 41 ' I A 1F,i. t,I f 6 �'1, r y ^ •7 f 4� '� ' I o f b' 1 �i -"1 !I l ' r :f iY I'{ s I f %Id{).. $ t :'r• j t 1' 1 �1� �I 1� i m 13 1, Sv ��.� JN r. I m, i I °Ai ) {Y if r ! 1 �' ^' Y I H f 1 - F 11 r �1 d IY i( I! 4 �P , k r, l k e'. I 1 1 p o 1 I{ ,. tii . �' �'+'tr elii y I %, J v I I r {. .fit G 1 .., i,, rr x t41i .� + r ] i 1 5 -.' , t,lp ➢j� Y:4f , s`µ a s .r d rill+d b' h I Yq I t .A , 1 Crd r +dl .il rlf n rr d b, t r'F17 I� _:! r l' 'hk , {pr +.r g t , .d. , : , { ' II f , 2 r,' ,; J t"... t+ I I kv I qt r Yi 1 �, �' r y { I f g t,;+ ,'+1 e i `r, ' ( }sb + �Y l �. {ili'� y �, 1 r I h.•, 1l:t { r y } ,, r I IG r� r tP�'� .iii r r Ah i ti 't a t ., j" + I ; r. p l a , m , ,` , (i A l y _ . fi I t Y{ l{ 1 u , 111 S I ,i J. 4 �f,; I1 + f :I i "" (" 1w r �", I' � r rfL !t , '� i,t/�ii:;�yr i1'r '� li Yl4 '@ Inrn7 i , ,I �{r.- I :+g✓r j't t 'ih,�t ,,{^k.i,. Y . y.; I I"; ,d a f 4 ,.; .'; 1� , ,r a7'�,,,1 id'b^�r'I I+� r`^Y, ;� ly !.'ti C .`: �Id .F.q lt�r!,rrm�,.: F r 16"-•, b +I 0� jl.:i ,,S.I b t fY- r ITl�P ' f'J' {� 'l,n i �E':.I ja �., p) y ty�r� �i ;r .' •� ', .,,I 5 j r 'I ry t y,,t-,i+, ,.l IS c ,5� f } y l �i� + 11, §IY'l;'4 l i:.l 'sl f,I 4 1M , Ira, It 16 -1 I�+' ' 1' i,r,,.� a I,', 9uc 11£a I I i i I ! a` , I r P, i . 11 p t y iI lel , Y 1 c {1� ',r ITh de ears 'ootuor1eel,+^it.' ssi '�Iat 'I�,I . abaam' s re. epti.t 6��� �i. �';;dj ., t 6 r '^ , . + r hy, o f ' it �' I' , e s t for thin � � 1 e '"' E:,' , ' � , , i` � 1. �:, i. , Iii `r, Mi r B Ps,� , 4� "q,i yr ( it r r' s r r :., '' , i' :., f , ( 'l 'l , ��x ._IA vor' Atatel t , th e1 td, m nt° o the c�trrr w�rd3 � 'I ,' A� I ,' ' '+' 4 i �' ' , Y i I' ��aa j l j i" t, �i ra II doh:, 'to e' �t hs.r Iri'dered, f3h4 't ` .I ft"0 t �,@Qe#ffi ' 'boul, bb roo d d tt� 'fit 1o' ,'' I �'i1 t f � }� ut., a , I.t° {Ili ,,Iu , 'r1 1 Gid '� -tai off]. I I, ,.,,, r1. L., ' r �E { + R" t� i�l�'8t'i "r `�. a �i Q E'�1t�. ih@C� t �'�I , aI Eli I1. I�t,l1i ;,11G ,:,Weep a@gel$ res , - „ -, sa q esen with *' f land to. a oar 'fit toI. #, 'i �' s x P-a�nt�. ascus n rs�a'd �` r ILIA.r " ro d' ii va;Ll b1e `'flat fit, :, te,r a oec't.6111 , ', ,1 : , I1. f k d" r I ,VMent would a ve , tc► ta+swe h Che Z n� ,fid' : d ty�, �j,j�� e 11 1 vj li 111 ) f , r: ('fl�: I r ,. _i ,% i•, I j Yt� r " �'fA +r'$e�3Ci'i�T'b�L' tG t 0 t� r I ��I a �C ra #3 t, gad '�tai�►vr off' I�x3.'3me r ,fy Y { l!" j j tA� +� �} J' ,(. ,{y, y� :.I j 1 + :'y1. 1.p4, .C�, I,J!� 1'r°t ,I1 y r! id b 0s4 .b +M 17 @!"w�`" l� Cf' l r t' ,ri for res d r +VSs iii. , ,, FN•J y,{NRI y I' y � , p ' ( , " t ;4 1. +� , i e i , a'� . F� YYld7(/��"��G/S' +� rte. g �s �,t�r y r /�'�j, { Q p�, t1�y,{ I ,-j M !�. f 9 'V.tO' .alIIed 1/' 'hi' V � GI �14r� to �' �i 0 A I t Om Qti� �" , "1. {` h 1'A f I1 4 4 � r : 41 t ( y t $I ,. � , �. .', . , r f I r , i 1, r 1,I I ' �, 'I 6 1, i', 1 t I .I. I .t f 1 it Ta stuff` ' �. 'i�lo tes enr� �b, crf a�' ment 1�, 3,e o t 1 '�,' I Iii ti j I t ' q p t, 'f. . I , I �`, N M'eL 11. T 1% 1 , ,l , r it I w V� �7 Vi 1814 8 +�F - +• R� " ,'I � , � I ' � �`� y I I" <� Ila io r*"+ 1 �b '`� y y a d q { j a �(� 1 �j 1 ' tX1 `+ la T 9 ���dd7V.L�ers. a 4ed 4' �ki � A►7W odu��':1r�{nQ� ��ry y� e�J. w 9 III'll r !r. � y� , �I h ,v [ a .,( I Y, 4 w}@stl +ia r 0 M U "T 'Ji"'i ' e 1 , .. 1 � j „I. , 7 I!� . ,rt t;r11 V ,,,f finds 'involved fab vv� s +i''' tie 1mn I �b,. �' d Invoiv a�. '' , � � 1 1131��� ,J , 4j ( I f 1111 : ` I j , 1 -_. , 1't I , , 6 � ,, IL 1 'triS ' r O'. : A s mad b ' iii ert �I +� `" `fid aea+�ade b a k°, 'cry; I "�, eft I s i r A` ,' , 'y a r i d i - I ern , ssan' �'@�omate�a� �.o ti��� C� G� nill.°�1x C&ac's a onll.�, Ir r u' t d , y o o8e area► " ,,:� alj+ :4 2a y , :`" r t @ �6rpor�t,tab wen : I $ O W@l�� Ci$ ;t 8 511 ' it ,' Q Z1t�''C�'G�adrLt ea r' :I ?�T. all , ' �,., � ', . ° > ar t de i�b�opere Proaiuc a ne es ett ra reg ueffit1 dy pA� ,I �.�1 �F �ril'C 4 sI. Q lr:L� , ' "Etta! O'p�11C1ed r 1s "e t,t1 "Al; tll �r, Y I r tb@r'haI 1,t. !do 1�t $ roTddl 87ilkY"i1 !�I16 Q1�.0 ' + ' +', ' n+ Igf ,yy f rant 6t�,tft ` 3�r I ill„^ 11 O1:,1ri' '' V It a P .,�4 11' F i�oill v' ,t1'9w�iv id .� ' ', ,�,K n r 4 ,I 4J ' ' ` 1. 1. 11 j 'I � d , J I . s y 4'' 1 X 11 . 1 f I P p f , a t Y i h ` 1 l :I �. Yy_4 E 1 4 1� ,.7 ^ 11 ��V }�q� , it I f F.,� I 9 ° n �passe'd. , Al .lea,. . 4 I . i sal i�. I11 i 'tsS I , � ' 1^ d �, + ( c v ', ' { C ,: I 1 �.' 1I 11 t I f (r4' q'. , J Y ,, p i :i�F'�f { NJ� , ^ ):vier Then .iA 0 d ' �. ' t ' � f CYC .' pl9 1.hob d��r tl r ' %r'' t "+ I 'j , 1 @�. �Q �Lt7�'e t $I7�@West: I I 11 i'a 'a p I g t r Subdivision re u stink) QYiB der•. 1' i,fl kl r . i ; It, ' I ;I 'I 11 �t`w �t Qui W�18i1 the �$$$ a1.Te {ii_'�. P'r8 dTnb� ".$ p�]"!t6@E4t�31 e.8t ( � ' , "-* r o + o, 111� , , e s � is land 0 ga se S use I�� + a II , II 1`11 11 r �� I was int I t," p0 ed oyt $BE 8 di ° t 3@ a Qg©1`jl ' st1 Divi ion a A@fit', , I al r surface to their rre t. '],3n e' and 1t tirciu;d ' be, p�'obabl�r nece saryr r,lr. , , , , I 1. °, I11 1 ll lti3ps �o plane �a a sum ine tem', a° 13 t s at ori to h� . 3 t s ton 'iii i` ��'� a11 I ttc Gregarary S bdigi��s�n � �, I: F ^e 'a; 'I 'It was also . discus ed t t the �t�pe�apmsnt to the N rte ould it aft ' + 1` "ts:; b+ �,d h 13.saes Meet at�d a d ix�t r rntal a avit X10 ;li solar L .ride c a11 I �t ” ,;� `11 , 11 ' �I , I f ! '' ., •1 I I. I,i9 1 Y fi. 8� JI i I o ' f �' r h q , � 1_, I I ,. 4 j1 i 'Girl„ a, w r { e} ff { j ? 1 a I if 5 7 r v I I r 1 I I a I. j Mi l ly 1(in rt E,A�, t.' +r ,1 ' t i I i .f i I r I1 11 Q f 4 F{ r 11 a r ,, 1. 11 Y r �.. I,�q r „hl ,h" Br,,.ls,. i:'Y, .,i I Y `a t'1 r I' 7 V �� ' y, {, A , ,, ' F. 1" M) A !•,'�,l,^It# 1:q.r , r,', , + P 1 , t1. 7 d 1 4 :�; + , ¢j r,#11i'. ,a 1 la^`i. yr d,l ;1 1-6., fi�l 1 i'.� I `l .Iq aridian lannin9 and Zoni ssion .3 LI February 11 Also, they will put in Gruber St. to the south of their property. The creek runs along the side of the proposed road, a foot bridge in center proposal, two (2) accesses, deceleration lane. Jim Potter is in the process of developing a neighborhood concept plan which includes this area. Sharp stated the agreement to put the street down the west side, to put in their portion of Gruber St. and that it appears to be a quality development. Hinrichs expressed desire to keep Five Mile Creek open and bicycle paths. Chairman Sharp called for comments from the public for rezone hearing. There were.none. The Motion was made by Mitchell and seconded by Tewksbury to recommend approval to the City Council of Gentry Rezone Triangular parcel from "A" Residential to "C" Commercial, the same as the front parcel, streets to be reviewed with design review.. Motion Carried: All yea. jenda 6 Meridian Plaza -Gentry Annexation James Gipson stated that they desire input regarding a proposal of 36 units I n 3 acres (12 units per acre) which complies with proposed density. Townhouse units, sold individually, in one development, project as a whole (Meridian Plaza) would be a good tax base, provide necessary streets, and utilities. Gipson felt the market would not support all of this property as commercial as they know it would with this kind of development, .Five Mile Creek provides a natural transition. Sharp felt that putting in 5th St. and Gruber St. would be a fair trade-off for multi -family (12 unit per acre). Hinrichs agreed with Sharp and stated also, the improvement of Five Mile Creek. Mitchell felt the access plan was acceptable. There was discussion concerning the maintenance. Gipson stated he is involved as a designer in Lakewood Subdivision, PUD and Maple Hill, there are tight requirements, but they are doing well. Gipson.stated they would come back with a formal request. genda 7 Meadowview #2 - Final Plat Mike Milhollin and Ken Montee, developer displayed both the Preliminary Plat and the Final. Plat. The Preli.mfhary Plat had been marked for approval by Council May 29, 1979. The numbering of the 71ots and blocks has been changed since Preliminary approval by request of the County engineer so that they be consecutive with Meadowview #1. Montee stated that he had met with Dick Williams and Lot 1, Block`. 1 will be dedicated 50' right-of-way to the City for a road. This would have to be submitted before Council in writing. Or Montee stated that when he was before Council, the Fire Department had a comment in writing that they found nothing wrong with the Plat. Milhollin stated that modification had been made on the cul-de-sac to meet minimum lot frontages for federal funding. Also a parcel missing along the northern boundary which was acquired through condemnation procedure in 1918. Mr. Montee and Mr. Allen paid for, but never did get this as it belongs to BOR. Approximately one and a half acres adjacent to Five Mile Creek. The BOR has roughly 140 feet right-of-way along Five Mile Creek. Milhollin stated that -they had experienced difficulty finding the existing water line, there was not an easement to it. The City requested that they include the design for connecting sewer system which is currently operated by a lift station. The Motion was made by Hinrichs and seconded by Tewksbury to recommend to the City Council approval of Meadowview #2 Final Plat. Mntinn f Arriad- Q17 vpa _. r,. %4 L Meridian Planninc and Zoning Commission .3 14, 1979 Orton inquired if Boesiger had written into the covenants that the easement along Nine Mile does not prohibit recreational use. Boesiger stated he had. Hinrich stated that ACHD has strongly advised bike paths in regard to this concept. The Motion was made by. Mitchell and seconded by Orton that Sunnybrook Farms Preliminary Plat be recommended for approval to the City Council, with the condition that covenants be the same; sewer and water standard. Motion Carried: All yea Agenda 6 Bews'.& Smith Industrial Park Preliminary Plat - Located on East Pine Wayne Forrey was present representing Smith & Bews Industrial Park Preliminary Plat. Forrey stated that they had met with ACHD and resolved the problem of access upon Locust Grove. There will be only three accesses onto East Pine, four on Locust Grove. The 10 inch water line and sewer will be extended from east 5th. Forrey stated that they forsee small businesses. There would be a choice of small or large lots. Sharp stated that there should be landscaping and buffering in between accesses. The Motion was made by Mitchell and seconded by Hinrich that Smith & Bews Industrial Park preliminary Plat be approved with Design Review and sewer and water to meet standards. Motion Carried: All yea Agenda 7 Meridian Manor #4 Preliminary Plat Wayne Forrey representing Devco, Inc. Meridian Manor #4 Preliminary Plat. Action was held until input of Comprehensive Plan. Torrey stated—that density excluding office area facing Meridian Road is 3:8. Mail boxes will be located at the curb cuts. Central water and central sewer will be provided for; all street names will be for approval of APA and the City; fire hydrants will be provided according to City Ordinances; an additional crossing of Five Mile Creek will be discussed with Fire Department and an agreement be reached. Forrey stated that the planned park area of the old sewer plant was considered being used by BSU as a test station, which would change the proposed use next to 8th St. If the sewer plant is used for a Votech establishment, they would want a redesign to make extra deep lots. There was discussion on street and access of sewer plant area. Problem of bike path on Federal property was discussed. Public right-of-way was discussed. ACHD has asked Devco to do a redesign because of no public right-of-way on 8th St. Sharp stated they needed the street matter resolved before coming back to Planning and Zoning. The Motion was made by Mitchell and seconded by Orton that Meridian Manor #4 Preliminary Plat be tabled until June 11, 1979. Motion Carried: All yea Agenda 8 Meadow View #2 Revised Preliminary Plat Al Marsden spoke, representing the owner Roger Allen. Marsden referred to previous discussion of 8th St. and explained design of use around old. sewer plant. Access has been provided to adjoining landowner and will have to build a ditch which would be piped. Marsden stated they have provided two culdesacs. Lots have been designed for more outdoor use. Density is 4.29, smallest lot is 55X105. A special lot variance is requested to accomodate new design area. Units are approximately 1300 sq. ft. 0' lot line. L! Meridian Plannin and Zoning Commission is Marsden stated that they had designed area with the intention that the old sewer plant would be used as a park. They would be putting up a fence to screen it off. There was discussion. 1979 Marsden stated thtat bicycle paths would be provided along Five Mile Creek if the City puts in the Park and would allow recreation use of that easement. The Motion was made by Orton and seconded by Hinrich that Meadow View #2 Preliminary Plat be approved, subject to the recreational allowance on the Five Mile Creek easement and subject to subsequent use of the Development Plan Final Plat; sewer and water compliance. Motion Carried: Hinrich, yea; Orton, yea; Mitchell, nay Agenda 9 Crestwood Estates Centre Valley Rezone Request John Matzinger from CTM Engineering was present representing Crestwood Estates Centre Valley Rezone Request. Sharp called for comments. There were none. The Motion was made by Orton and seconded by Mitchell that Crestwood Estates Centre Valley Rezone Request be approved. Motion Carried: All yea Agenda 10 Hank Houst DBA Merle Mall Rental Co. Duane E. Johns, architech and Hank Houst was present representing the___ Shopping Mall, 1603 E. 1st St. The parking lot in the proximity of 1616 Meridian St., required a Conditional Use Permit. Houst stated that the old station on the corner of Meridian St. and Franklin had been sold to Ron and Sherill Byron, and that they were responsible for tearing the building down. Houst stated that the building will be completely sprinkler system for fire protection. The access would be a "straight shot" clear through from one street (E. 1st St.) to the other (Meridian St.) There would not be landscaping because their frontage is so narrow. Sharp inquired if Houst there could be some sort of curbing to prevent cars from backing out onto street. Houst answered yes. Chairman Sharp reminded the Commission and public the purpose of this hearing was for a Conditional Use Permit for the parking lot. The Motion was made by Orton and seconded by Mitchell that Merle Mall Rental Co. be issued a Conditional Use Permit for the parking lot subject to design review. Motion Passed: All yea Agenda 11 Arnie Subdivision Preliminary Plat - Located on E. Pine St. Orton abstained from action. Neale Messick was present representing Paul Stutzman on this proposal. Messick stated there would be some minor changes after reviewing the comment recap. He stated the dimension of buildings would be approximately 20 to 24 feet in width, depending on whether they are one or two bedrooms. Some would be single story; some would be two story with garage drivi.ng underneath. There would be a break in roof line as well as front yard appearance. Some natural landscaping would be along Five Mile Creek. These units are designed for retirement people. Orton reminded the developer of the request of barracade on State St. eridia P1anni , Zoning,.4, November l3 �, 1g7�; �d h item 7 Cont. Burl Pipkin stated that Wright had asked for approval. Pipkin made a motion that the -commission deny approval on the basis that the Commission has nothing to, approve. The motion was seconded by Rick Orton. Lee Mitchell abstained from voting Pipkin: yea; Orton; yea; Tewksbury: nay; Hinrichs: nays pop, Sharp broke the tie with a yea vote. a Motion passed: Approval denied , 1 teem V Stonehouse, Qpdi ke A Merle, Ten Mile LOS Annexations ti Conditional Approval had all ready been given to Stonehouse, Updike, and Merle, subject to the simultaneously. LUS Church property requesting annexation, and being annexed Sharp stated that they need only one motion to annex the four parcels of property, �The motion wasmade by Annette Hinrichs and seconded by Lee�Mitchell to approve the r, four annexations conditional on them going to sewer and water, Motion passed: All yea Item 9 Meadow 411 ew #2 Final p1a�t` No one was present representing the rues,.' '� q stated that. the applicati��n,for final lot a not a pro dr application. Hinrichs _ �v_ pE -` The motion was made by Annette Hinrichsthat the Commission notify the developer< that it was not a proper -final plat application, and please resubmit. - ' The motion. was: seconded by Keh Tewksbury. Mo ion a ped- A11 yea tt 10, Stov�en Hesac.(piscussionon I -U6 Retail site) ,:. Hosac stated that he wished'to reopen discussion on the LOS Church Project (Ttem) on the Thomas �joc stated that property. he felt thet^e was not; a traffic problem in they areas Hosac stated that they wanted to propose the possibilty of moving the 10 acre Church:' to the Fast side of the 4'. from.tY►e West; side of the Thomas prop over ro rty; Hos'ae stated there are several reasons for the proposed move, He stated p po 'development. It that the 1pve would leave a` much larger' i eco of land for future Joser the sewer and water line. 'Hosac would also put'the-0hurcb pro ect Duch to Mated that the move would alow more of a transition from the commercial buffering sk through, into 'reside ntialarevs. Sharp stated that he felt there wad aega1 question involved. s' Webber stated that as far. as the phurch is concerned, time is very important, and they the move. would like the Commission to move as soon as possible concerning 4 {` Sharp stated that he felt that even though what they wars doing would make the'project involved, and. was cthey would have oncerned that better, 'there is a legal question to startthe'whole Conditional Use Permit process over. r< a. t 'r Y i } 1 .. September 19. 1978 3� �,teridiFan Phinning nnr1 Zn nina OntnhPr 21 _ 1 q7Z _ Theit thE Commission reco end Ito the City Council th t a conditional use pe mitb, allowed from Ord nance 2-4 5:11 for the 6reEtwood Subdivision , to allow for common wall betwe n dwellings and ro si a yard. th8 lAot'on passed. All Y a, Ga y Smith and �,umnar J3h son vererp esent to discus the ,Aeadow Vi w Su division. lir. Johnson addressed himself to the lot matter that -_ad pome up pr viou.ly because the Copmaission dad requested a lot be Left �or access to adjoining properties. ..r. Johnson isprepa ed t :ur hase the 'dot in uegt' on t hold it that had been as an a ailable access it this is necessary. He indicated ftiE fau t tnat this :uatte had not been resolved ure ious y. .Ir. Johnson presented alt rnate proposals how t this -lot. he a e ad'oini lands out that Gould be developod withou uti izin so pointed the retention of this lot-coull be lostly to �,lr. 1'ro t as well as others whc might desire to devel p. In fa -t, trnis lot might not be n eded to aid in development. Sewei cou d be provided to the 'Asst at much more accnomical means, because of Less depth required. Don Roberts, The motion was made by Willard i%-owley and seconded b7 the Cor.nnission recorri. end to the -City Council t -A the to that had ---That- b( -,-en req est::;d to be held for access to adjoining pr 2erty be released in the h1 adow View subdivision Motion P sled. All Yea. Gary -- Smith presented a pr, blerr, t' at has arrisen when the Developers of the "o iginal tract of land iad made ,a cizan e in ow ers ip ta some degree. The County is requiring a arrie ded platt to signify the o ners ip of the lands more fully. The motion was made by Own Fr st and seconded by Don hob,rts that the commission recommend to th3 pitir Council that the Mme ded Platt Certification of Cwnership of the 1,1 adow View Subdivision be approved. �aot`on p sled, All Yea. The2eridian Place S bdiv Sion wag dig ussed, TA Attelshowed r y, NIA rid i an Plann.inn �e redrnW by e . The next item was the °scus io of the to had i tended to b o a ert owned b ice; � stenion _ �3 �� f-acdet3 o `o h .eot am-qtttFa-rr -171-1 Q71 thin uwi tht er DraviOU9 tim -thin fiad he in re t)ested-- All 5 k i i thA thought year an€n that AA3? r I ter Y of Robert Glair. 197 er. GO tp a Mr. ri-Par --v was )IC 3SUG ,�the- �r. Pulley also took issue with the letter ani made kn wn hia ec Mono to this mann r of addressing the city as well as the comm osio_ . It was the wish of the cdaimissiorl that it be unde stood that the p licy has been and is now. that the develo er ro id ccess from AS l ds to adjoining and thai will develop in the utur mn that _ ;hey would do this for n o Le, a d that the fact that J.t wag Mr. kroot ad;n thin to do with 't. Fir. Skiver recited several Olacep in the city thai the subdivide ad been required to cub it and gutter to a stua end. to Erovido such n access at his expens- in orde to comply with t is polio . is Orton c0nuslting E ins r re reser:ta.tive severl ropo -- ala that would sd isfy in lieu of a lot rese -ugpJsted vat'on. Luld sc c t wao noted that th n that . hAr h,: -CAI n -tT I t n L3Z Q3n a �- C 4- L- - - V U-3-.(JRD-9jF3 da-qkrR.qhlA hA'n_C1109=3 5. Pumpm-merithan irrigation District, trnf-PLe is discouraged in tiiase Lrna.,n- A Ua- L9 -4 1 ti 9 1`.I I Another suggestion was that Meadowview give an eaEement for water and sewer across their laridE� in lieu of a reservatLon f c F a ot. Mr. Frost spoke more than orice to assure thos) PrES611t that he was imoartial and would not vote or convent on this issae. VII atevor 'Play tie Commission votel on this matter was alrigh; wi h hi rd and he would accept the decisim.' Lftat — 1dr Skiver stated he-fEvored tho original concept of holding the ot. rRobnrt_a favored liclding to the of roservaticn. M rPalley rps�)on(lad o a uestion af- the demffl"ers, Morton —:in, tbat Lin had his m tid aj-9da up, that Frost d d j2ot caro nr- into the solution, and respented this- ThA SU gesti-an thAtinn easement for witer and sewer, across their or perty W31" ...both the develope', and ivir. -Vrost the need of spen1ding one at raft later time to deyal-QZ 2 rcqdway that Pos6ib. -"r dmot be nec- ss There was discuss on 6bout voting on this mat,oar at this time, The motion was i-aalo b JJon Imos anci econded--ty Dr._ Palley, that e comclission postpond the d-ecis' on on. the InRttST of -Lee lot res- ervation. for access to th Fro: t property, Motian Passed© The Meeting stood adjourned. Atte t.* Chairman ----7 City kilerk cc-. lamming & Zoning Comflissio a y Council and Mayos; ommissionors; ACOUG;.Gentra S net Heaqlh Dist.; owoll Investme- ats--m-0; �Pottage Home Add; V. 0", No so 3rd ACHD Pumpm-merithan irrigation District, Meridian Planning and Zoning September 17, 1973 Meeting called to orjerb; the qhairman, W. D. Skiver. Members present: Owen Fr' _y; Willard Rowley rQst;_D6n Roberts; Dr. Lee Pu 1 le Others present: Robert G�aisye�; Larry Hoffman; B� Glenn; I Gary mith What is to be inj the 4onven� , Lnts to prohibit the lots on Fran,-,lin from —becoming a means of �ccess there is a need to provide adc�ess to adjoining Double frontage lots along Tranklin The Commission wouldl like to se6 an -overall platted drawinIg for -I his area. 4 ft. sidewalks1will'be allowed, I in Road to Mr. Glaisyer stlated that a�fence will be placed along Frank� F7 avoid using thi's are as access to Franklino There will be a� access on Linder at Waltman Lane and one-mlore in addition to the on e on Aanklin at S.W. 12 th Street. The 7/2 acres t6 the East and facing Franklin was queqtionea as to his the method . and Itype of growth in the future for thisiarea. Mr. Glaisyer stlated that they were requesting a widt of ft. on with 5 ft, easement�' Dry line sewers will b plaxtd prtided the can give them a,grade elevation. The Motion was made �by Dr� Lee Pulley and seconded b,� Don Roberts that the the Council for acceptance with:,West 12th Street designedlas 60 foot iridth 4 foot sidewalks to,be allowed; that the 1000 foot intersection equired to the -_-_- accordingthe ordinance be released; i be required to control the access to Franklin Road a�d th�tad ble frontage for lots be allowedialon&Franklin Road, Motion passed: All yea. Meadow View Subdiviion was discusse& Upon investigating the records it was found that an ELCcesp to acjoining The Commission felt that an access iohould be allowed to the Ower Frost -property to the South before fJ.Tia3 --acceptance- of the, drawings -cc uld be ' c~~------JGary­-Smith represented the ~`~~~ proposal ��--_-- ._�-~_--_ _.--___ -� eetin called to order b t e Ch 99'b esent^ �on_R t r--=ceming.. theC1 ty. ::=:bUm.of th"plM __capa�alt; fany t2b�V� QED _Zn nip rnxm�a _if� u i vas dtb&t_-p1ann mBeda -toga- &Ae of Action ®est 'V �---w 111 t & -c G ��, i n the met �0f_;sew di� rs� i fight ffit_to-be d. - -- - ---- -- -- -- - 1 I e commission felt _ th t_ the _ ehou�Ld_Ve-CMxtio�-Irk- PP ovin add &I ---- - f Lm d t at would prodmce _pew_ r __1_0 at. t ®g1 �_. si vh -t-ev ry. o fort hq�b ede t reduce the groundwa er. f w int - as - so Ce- of ­a matter of the goers n pre entin hi proposal _at�c r time he - broblet of his feeliz that he has placl d, hiffisb f in line--fo -A-be letQr _deliver_—___._ f sew r or water service.- _ The _c tumid on fe],t Uat there s Quld be =a—WWX.-- that the Commise. on_tmd th City Shoul _-have ths-aaY-an -to - he w at advantageous diti n_for. the Community est i�nteresit TU estion was raised as tth� _ rnia� doe9n of a s 'yl 4 the possible r of ?lawsuit. T ®moans and_s�cific tione1_wera presented n Viswas fo __the - e_ �a��ew --- div 81, eiesen-tq"y: the nand -- W14 -- d_- ±he M. M ost roperty-bordering Ll der..nInd Wes -of-he-Se n. -.g Stre t. 31-1- anoll.-_we.s--prez to-repre hm7re7t�h .� t'• T19 Motion was ffiade by Willa -d Row a and seconded b n Ro erts hat the Qn 1P::par AF ...... .»...,.. .......-._ ..,fit.,._..,,.... ^rt�x .. ._. .......... ,... .. 9 c-.... r.-. •.y- r � �, e .•�.•�-- Meridian Planning & Zoning Ipproy d for the Me_adol_yjj �Oat L ndmr Am a meat nf 9t; 2 March 10 Lb 73 -LW-- 12e ACL L-UOUnty Hjg=y_j)jKtj J.0 t Of _B-tra tt --and -Apeoif ications ..ad --approval f fire hjydrmta'..to.__bo ixmtalled y. tho mbd1vidmr_________'_ An Ahe plans a d i'.Oationu A _p f -t -he- --p0 arAmpnU of the Count A and t® of o1erlma_ Agency -, q,-- T_—Proper Handling of -Irri4at ion- water -Linea 9nd Stor DI. la, " with aqmat_Q__dumQQ81_' cif_ wast water and ai n water. 1w- the -0 MIS Dt4O"-WS-passad.__Dr_ra3aiey,_ V --Robert a, 4obartiGlaisyer, abstained, Lenn 4aV_m.4_Pm_Q_hef'ori he.-c-O"slon with his 1! -sentatime, -4-eem. 2-maineers r t6 pre sent f arm 1 `0"B_"osed Trailer Park Inn U __be_Aeflign�,��*Abile_F _10 ted -mat -of the and_ fr_onj'ng._on__Merid1em_.Stre t, -proposal --au.-dram &pro ants prnximataly-13T-Lot an is de i9Aed_fQr___._ k I b-Sp9mlar- and. fide-Motdi -ho a, t roaAwayn ALra_ to. be G, at least. with-Cur.1-- t V. and _Vtt9Lrnd_Q!l_ed 7 __Tb U--promal- 10 --to --bu _Jal,Stage -Sewer, Pr an trpp Plans., tha 5 Hi -Drat flo-Wirg thr h-tbls.,Fla twould It Qvpe&-i f. . tfie.Drain hori -muld-p3rmit, t eaveral are do igned w 321 ilido travel w a, ich t )rminated in -t t teras ted eal ce t )t G L tYp of combluation parki g ar a gmd iCalde_oac_,__ Thess -are re ived ionsiderabl 'and-dinommion,-dum--thA-fact `that trazb_t=xckn, liver sm-and- 7 ack -out,, o turn - matter -of- Conn tbo two iraiisr__jp&rlAt_-veith-m X, lift open for furtior A$udy® 1jecives it uould 'Oona co nn pr maril toL- &_storzge___. r rOOreation vehicle julti i11ko iJe. tcmop by both parks is wholp pronortatio vmV Jtnbj 0 beanquo the commiIlae a4 adveme t kty -to -VI-QW -th a -plan riling -t J_t,hr�8 mat_b ase e&-bY the -2nd, land of the month as required., This atter is to be take up_a"a la or meeting 5.1 3! 2 Meridian_PlanningZoni February 25, 1974• e commission adjourje_dt_0_t__he__H3aring in the Council Chambers at this time. e firsto Id ColtageNorth is proposal presents 5 s rate lea buildings with a Daikine 3ot to ='Lay ov r a gr-01 em_. axea.4 On Ea. A_ 4th Street, whinh --Pr-es from towd-- t8318-3 for Vast Side Park S:abd_ia,%1_nn_ Don Anderson representing tki-0--Maposal was present to wMigin th He stated that detail drawingst-hmv balan presented to the A4 nty Hi_xbwaw .-proposal. intArdated In AeVsIoping East tales 1he necessary steps to 4ti dedicate 0+--,14- IV to -proper spee flea the roadways of East 4,h for street and to ur- P06854 lion Anderson further stated that he ro ect is a Farm Home DrQaem. which requires them to continue t ggpgrvise their installation k o livable standards for their renters. I ere was concern at t the means of traffic growt area. It was agreed that i t this increase roadways f thg are&.of Mckat actior should be taken to m 4th sad Washington Avenue. Andy Anderson cane in at this time. and. was introduce o 1hat by the.Aime Don Anderson, informed the Coommission t, t�t the -proposal — to be hold on March e Motion was made 4Jack % Chard and seconded by Owen Froi _ of An Anderson, located North of Eas Washington, and on East th Street be ,a recommended to the City Co ncil for roval. Motion Passed. All Yea, Dr. Lee PtLlley Absent* Joe Simoziok, owner of the broDerty. to the North of the Heow,V ew Sub -- t e- o other acces in on Ustick Road. is _11.1 nd Lock hia plaeee_ C Meridian planning & Zoning Commission Februwy 25, 1974. I was thought that when Meadow View Subdivision Number 2 s vretented or preliminary approval, that at that time Chateau. Avenue 9hould b o have a cross street stubbed over o th right -of-=. 7wicial Oro Ing at this area R nald A. Wright. b 0 Wright stated that-ke hod In"eseated his proposal to �h gf the propertion + i th t this back -Is aonsidered�- om witb.-Ii-foot he G-aldesae. -- erhead wireing is c aside ed. -- °Water Main, m d am, so S wage Trunk line fire hydrant in the Cudde ac area I was thought that the double frontage lots are not deiireable,bul that at his time, it appeared the eat r ute tp pursue to develop tis Und into usable -- eside tial lots. _Th a wa lanai adjacent to this roadway i 1 the form c easements that w ld create problems s to who was to maintain and ke up, 6speGially n the South Side. —Mr Skiver, and the Coum ission felt that some means shocud be takes t'o assure the properties in the Western Subdivislon, that they would nOt-be not—betaxed for the addit onal improvement tha might result by this double frontage, that has come about or would come about as a result Df acceptance of this prop6ed d veto meat. Mr. Wright is to take hils plan to the JM Jhxineers for further drinipga in Ian att_ t to resolve the an_Tirol, lima. j _. me Planning and Zoning -- -" .2. February► 26, t�'73 ' ' •. It was further reco ende that he'Colmission consid r`th plat meat of e sewer lines o a to facilitate additi nal owth f adjoining property owners if ound to e easa e aft---- er nee ng s ., Mr. Skiver read a le ter from , 'Tnc. ._ This letterIs o file . M requestiig Wat e o e oom r c, oca e s 3 ie i�®-aaow ew �-idl soa, West and South of th Die sal ]ant be'aanexed to t Cit . Fo this,.'` pr e e ey wou no requie Sewer oro , �er"ior s t , e� had developed Meadow View Subid vision. This letter request a exati n it wash pointed out, doe not olve the City pro em o sews overload n rela on o gainingappr va oto A119— State Health Dept. (s th letter on file herewith w d in icate The Commission felt 'twat his r quest should not be ns�id_ red a tbi '�imel cause hoy` el t t t th ��@ve opios� m g t—ta o h e a s z! e for use later. It was felt that the Comm cion would be irresponsib to ges additional annexation or an eady overt led aewere : ;.. Dr. Pulley, as well s al the thers on .the ommiss n s ted hat; the City ounc make al o f its t `stimulate underFETA oney+ o oomple e x the sewer study that is n in rOVgsse' .,It was -fel by t e Co usion that 7{' new developments sh d cur led; :sun � e sewer ant s e gec3 or' definite proof is pr sent d tha the"plapt can handl addi conal flows during the summer Pe f ws. ` �' —� ry, i y Clerk � r , 4 t — s a. t .. ',a.,.n,-;..,.,,,.y.,....,. .m:..,,.+-err ....rma--r«-..w•ninrti:r,,..,, .. -,7�. ..,..>.,_,;msaa<<,.:xmrn,.nn«ea,:c n-,.rn.n .mHra a,x v.vm-enar aama-nr.;. ,.v:..., w. n,.,. ,. d,... .,.:'.. .,r..... a,.,..m: e_-eek-n.... \ ,Meridian City Mall .40 March k, 1978 Mr. Coleman pointed out that this line would benefit other people and suggested that the City develop a policy for reinbursement, also the number of valves could become a maintenance headache to keep operative. There was discussion as to the cost distribution on lines. The Mayor felt this should be between developers and thought the City would go along %-ith reasonable proposals. Mr. Williams stated that if the City does get involved with this, because of Bond indenture any money collected would have to go to pay off bonds. The City j cannot act as a collection agency. Agenda 7 John Ewing, representing hiring Company on a parcel of land at 2912 Street and Gruber, was present to request a variance of five (5) feet on 29/2 Street. Discussion of variance request pointed out that sewer line repair would have to be done six to seven feet from the house foundation at a depth of approximately 91. The Motion was made by Richard Williams and seconded by Marvin Bodine that the five (5) foot variance be granted to Ewa.ng Company to build a house at 29/2 Street and Gruber. Motion passed: Williams, yea; Glaisyer, yea; Bodine, yea; Kingsford, yea. Mr. Ening was instructed to work with Bruce Stuart, Work's Sup't., and that this hookup will have to be inspected. Agenda 9 Carl Stoddard was present to request transfer of Beer License from Donald Bennett located at 229 West Franklin. The Wine License was not to be transferred. The Plotion was made by Grant Kingsford and seconded by Richard Williams that the Bees License Transfer from Donald Bennett, located at 229 gest Franklin to Earl Stoddard be approved, contingent on the State clearance. { Motion passed: Williams, yea; Glaisyer, yea; Bodine, yea; Kingsford, yea.. Agenda Landscaping of the Park was discussed. ll Mr. Ellsworth reported that he had discussed a tree plotting plan for the City with the Landscape Architect and he has given an estimate of approximately $300.00 to develop that plan. The Motion was made by Richard Williams and seconded by Marvin Bodine that the City proceed with a landscaping plan for the park. Motion passed: Williams, yea; Glaisyer, yea; Bodine, yea; Kingsford, yea. Agenda dim Stubblefield was present, representing Stubblefield Development. It was 12 reported that Franklin Square Preliminary Plat was approved by Planning and Zoning and City Council Contingent on some changes in the plan. EZr. Stubblefield volunteered to be on a committee considering reinbursements for sewers and crater extentions. The Motion was made by Richard Williams and seconded by Marvin Bodine that the Franklin Square proposal be tabled until the April 3rd meeting. 14 Motion passed: Williams, yea; Glaisyer yea; Bodine, yea; Kingsford, yea. Agenda Dick Phillips was present to obtain policy decisions as to one (1) or four (4) 10 water meters on Four-Plexes in Sandlewood Subdivision and if they have to extend crater lines past the front of thein property in Meadowview Subdivision. Mr. Phillips was informed that the City s policy is one (1) meter to Four-Plex9 and Mr. Stuart stated that the question developes around the 107 feet that was anneed as part of Meadotrview Subdivision. Mr. Kingsford stated that whoever -at-iris-that should be responsible, and when sewer and water are available, they must hookup to City services. Meridian City Hall .8. March 6, 1978 i The Motion was ane' by Joseph Glaisyer and seconded by Richard Williams that the Sanitary ServiceGranted the rate increase for trash haul services effective May 1st, 1978 and acc pt this proposal that the twice -a -week service be for the months of June, July d august only, the hottest months of the year; that the rates for the trash hauling be set as follows: 1. Basic Rate $2.65 per month 2. Extra Can (signed for) 1.00 per month 3. Extra Container .40 per pickup 4. Extra Service 1.50 per month Upon Roll call it was found to be a tie vote: Glaisyer, yea; Bodine, nay Williams, yea; Kingsford, nay The Mayor broke the tie by voting, yea. Motion passed. Mr. Williams explained the pump at the Golf Course. This involved an agreement with the Idaho Power for Mr. Leavitt to pay the costs of installation of $4,829.00. The other is an agreement with the Idaho Power that the City agrees to use a certain amount of power for this pump. Mr. Crookston stated that he had examined this agreement and feels that the owner of the land should sign the agreement. The City would assume this agreement when they owned this land. He felt that Nu Pacific wants the City to be bound by this contract to perform. Mr. Crookston felt the obligation is, and should be, borne by the land owner Nu Pacific. He felt that the contract should be signed by"NuPacific who is the owner. It was recommended by the Council that this matter be tabled pending the review of this matter by the City Attorney and the Idaho Power. Carl Ellsworth reported that in reference to Sewer line improvement project Phase III, all easements have been signed. Mr. Ellsworth also announced that the date of April 3rd 1978 is set for bid openings. Mr. Ellsworth continued by discussing the n4atter of Mr. Howe desiring access for his property lying in the vicinity of James Court Annexation. The City is planning a roadway to link up Meridian Street and Locust Grove. The City cannot make an actual commitment but will make every effort to avoid land -locking his land or any other lands., Mr. Ellsworth announced that a water main burst during the Phase II construction in the Meadowview #2 Annexation causing lack of water to the Meadowview #1 Subdivision for several hours. Another line was laid to another existing line to restore service this line will remain as an additional or a loop water flow for this area after the broken line is restored by the contractor. Mr. Ellsworth continued by reporting that involving Phase II Sewer Line Construction, a problem of water line in the Meadowview #2 Annexation, is being resolved. So that Meadowview #1 can be supplied water service a new line is now laid to correct a break in the original line by the contractor. The Motion was made by Richard Williams and seconded by Marvin Bodine that Change Order #2 dated March 3, 1978; Water line $2800.00, Crossing signs $67.90 each, $543.00 plus miscellaneous charges #36.90; that Phase II interceptor sewer line construction in the amount of $3,379.90 to North American Contractors be approved. Motion passed: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Bodine, yea; Glaisyer, yea. Mr. Williams complemented the Work's Department and the Engineers in the Quick repair of the problem when the line burst some time ago, as well as the rapid notification of the people informing them of the loss of water flow. 4 Tie matter of Meadow View #2 was. layed aside. l' I j yat AwS. Councilman Glaisyer abstained from taking any action on this annexation. i,t Hall .3. , of the'.Annexation. They, are requesting "A" Residential'. October 2, 1978 ! .. +Ol errn' stated. #2 (Preliminary plat) The Motion was made by RichardWilliams and seconded by Grant Kingsford to annex r the6.7,acre Crestwood Estate Centre Valley 'as "A" Residential. 11adow'View dones stated that the y were planning 1040 as a minimum (sq. Cllaisyer:restated the'City requirement. He stated that he wanted to see something h-: landscaping and two car garages. �. ss than' 5 acres; risked for A -Residential; Services and utilities are provided. They, will ,construtt to City Codes and adjacent to Five Mile Drain. es stated that they would have garages but felt the square footage was unreasonable, � uired ifit was a low. yid A req. I OrdiriahCe`Nurhber 332 was read entitled: AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN �. WNICH I5 DESCRI80 As FOLLOWS: APART Of THE NW 1/4 NW 1/4, SECTION store sated t�iat: it Was a City 1,0,1 icy. Upyr,adlny ur Mew ldiarr huu�iny wd� �tis�usyed and the fea5ibi1ity to developers. ;59-902 be. read un three different days be;dispense.d with and that Ordinance Number 332 f�4�tl s read be passed and approved'. Motion passed: Will'iams,.yea; Kingsford, yea; Glaisyer, abstain Jones stated that the only problem was with the square footage. 4 Tie matter of Meadow View #2 was. layed aside. l' I j Crestwood Estate Centre Val l ey AwS. Councilman Glaisyer abstained from taking any action on this annexation. Ct.�e Glennwas present representing Crestwood Estates. He outlined the boundary , of the'.Annexation. They, are requesting "A" Residential'. Williams in uired about density. ! .. +Ol errn' stated. that overal 1 i t i s 4.2 with open space. The Motion was made by RichardWilliams and seconded by Grant Kingsford to annex r the6.7,acre Crestwood Estate Centre Valley 'as "A" Residential. f Gxor Motion passed. Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea. Glaisyer, abstained ,� `�D�Oxo��Arit�exation) Lahr, Sal was present representing DOXO: He outlined the location. �. ss than' 5 acres; risked for A -Residential; Services and utilities are provided. They, will ,construtt to City Codes and adjacent to Five Mile Drain. 01'Uyer', recommended that DOXhO be annexed and zoned "A" Residential, seconded by ams Motion`passed: Glaisyer,,yea; Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea. I OrdiriahCe`Nurhber 332 was read entitled: AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN �. WNICH I5 DESCRI80 As FOLLOWS: APART Of THE NW 1/4 NW 1/4, SECTION N[. AND A PART'OF LOT 4, SECTION 1, T. 3N., R. lW., B.M. r' "3N. R. 1W. , , z .B. ADA ;COI�NTY, IbAHO, <T0 THE; CITY OF MERIDIAN, WHICH PROPERTY IS ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS ' T0''CHE� CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. {r The Motionwasmade by.�Richard�'Williamsandseconded by Grant Kingsford that the -„ r^+7e5 and proVi;s►ions of and all rules and provisions requiring that Ordinances ;59-902 be. read un three different days be;dispense.d with and that Ordinance Number 332 f�4�tl s read be passed and approved'. Motion passed: Will'iams,.yea; Kingsford, yea; Glaisyer, abstain 'rk� eri ian ii; ,Hall .6. October 2, 1978 ;en The .letter from Jack Dowdle was brought up on sewer connections. 'jl'Iiamsstated that he did not see how anyone can be hooked up. The situation was discussed. 'Dowdle stated that Tom Turco from District Health had stated when the ground water f subside& some could hook on. ings�ford stated that it _could jepordize City funding. 4 fir' 9> "f he Council was'in agreement that no new hook-ups would be allowed. The time t�b1e for :the new tart. wn4 �irpciilatad nh, �en+da Me ow view,#2 was reconsidered. They requested approval with the 1,350 square feet mum because there was no choice,. The.Motion,rp wasmade by Joseph Glaisyer and seconded by Richard Williams to approve the preliminary Plat based on 1,350 square feet minimum, extention of N/W llth Street, stubb,ing Chateau Drive and other conditions outlined. ,a Mot, n. passed: Will:iams,'yea; Qlaisyer, yea; Kingsford, yea. DOARTMOT. REPORTS BendaUperintendent Stuat^t reported on West Pine.` The City has spent around $30,000 to moue lines. Storey stated that we had not anticipated spending a lot of money but because of the poor engineering it was necessary. • rt tiillams nquire .how_ much, was attributed to moving the water lines due to the a' �1, a tgI iberfrig, pro.bl em of moving the storm drain. % Stuart stated around $5,000. r rw t ;Wi,Yltams:re' thatthis be documented Poor�eng9neering and future freezing problems were discussed. r> laisyer Inquired if the 'City was going to get together with ACRD. ;. a Wiiliams;dutlined the situation that developed and stated there was a question of 6 ' :who had Jurisdiction, the State orACHD. The*grade of ,the storm drain conflicted with City lines. y z 'Sturt stated that he needs a new back hoe for around $27,000.<. , y' R Williams 'inquired what was available throught the State. �: Storey instructed Stuart to report what he needs and the prise. �! Stuart.s.i;ated two (2) pickups, a dump truck, another lawn mower and sweeper around r, $5,000 OQ°a piece,, a, pipe locator,$600.00 - $700.00, industrial push -type mower $31��p00 $4ti000, cover `for pipe in yard at $45,000 or $22,500 - $25,000. VkF There roblem with Fire hydrants drants on West Pine. This was discussed, .d P agenda Superintendent Ward stated that they need transportation. agenda building Jhspector Schoen had nothing to report. l5; [G SULTANT REPORTS �ge%da ' City Engineer Ellsworth presented pay estimates: rreNydrants and charging of the lines was discussed. Meridian Citv Hall • .5. Mav, 290. 1979 Agenda - 13 Meadow -View #2 Revised Preliminary Plat Located west of 8th Sty, east. of Meadow View #1. Al Marsden was present, representing Roger Allen, Meadow View #2 Revised, Preliminary Plat. Marsden stated they were asking for 0' lot lines in an area for patio homes. He pointed out that this particular location is appropriate for this kind of development. Designs were outlined, allowi'ng plans and access to Sewer Plant area depending on future use and the J nat4-@# :a4 Lot 16 for through stree8th S� &`,c(e 40 There was discussion on the 8th St. widening at the Sewer Plant area. If this was to be a park, there would be parking lot area and there could be turn -around facilities to prevent the "dead -ending of 8th St. Engineer Smith questioned irrigation canal on the south side of proposal'. Marsden stated that the irrigition canal runs down the middle,of Delmar Dr. Smith stated that the right-of-way on Chateau is stressed as 60 feet every- where to the west. It was designated some time ago as being an arterial. IC Steve Hosac explained this has been discussed with Ada County Highway District and in lieu of the City not wanting Chateau to go through they would go,, from the Center section East to the 50's. Basically it provides away to go on out to Linder. The Motion was made by Bodine and seconded by Brewer to accept Meadow View #2', Revised Preliminary Plat subject to the design changes and Five Mile Creek Recreation easement; Bicycle paths would be provided along Five Mile Creek if the City puts in the Park and would allow recreation use of'that easment; and subject of sewer and water compliance. Hosac stated that. they recreational easement would have to be worked outwith iAda County"Highway District, how the easement is going to be situated is still up in the air. They have to find out how much of an easement is wanted on Five Mile Creek, it may be an off -set type of easement. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Bodine, yea; Kingsford yea; Bre w&,, yea,',,, Agenda 14 Sunnybrook Farms #4 Preliminary Plat - Located W. Cherry Lane. Max Boesiger was present, representing Sunnybrook Farms #4 -Preliminary Plat." at." Boesiger stated that homes will be of the middle and upper income bracket with energy saving features; houses are unique from the other; they are, encouraging landscaping; Phase I and II are ready to go; there is a neighborhood park and the other planned park is being reserved for the School District. The lots average 3.5 to 3.7 per acre. These are all single family dwel I i ngs Williams asked about double fronted lots on Cherry Lane. Boesiger stated those lots on Cherry Lane would be fenced off and landscaped"',.,` because of the possible 4 -lane traffic in the future. Williams stated the double fronted lots may require variances and, this.shQ4ld,:'1, .1.1'.., be prepared for Final Plat. Boesiger stated that School District will reimburse the value of the five acre School Site if they do not exercise this use in the next three years. Access and traffic was discussed. Engineer Smith stated that his major concern was of the requirements of,60 foot streets, the through streets eventually would need to -be widened. The wider right-of-way is necessary. The policy has been to require collector streets. There is a 5 foot easement on each side and adequate right-of-way should be provided for the future. Dean Briggs stated that Glennfield St, is a 60 foot right-of-way Street just* to the east of this property and has been carrying the Collector.status-,. The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Kingsford to accept Sunnybrook Farms #4 Preliminary Plat with the variances for Block 20; double frontage Lots 1 through 8 with the condition it put into a permanent fence and lond5cnpG# 0 Meridian City Hall .4. February 19, 1980 Agenda 7 Meadowview-#2 - Final Plat Mike Milhollin, Engineer and Mr. Montee, owner, were present, representing Final Plat request. Montee, now the owner, explained that he had picked this up after the Preliminary Plat approval approximately a year ago. The Mayor stated that he believed the plat had been approved with N.W. 10th St. as a through street and connecting with Delmar. Steve Hosac spoke concerning the redesign of the Preliminary Plan. There was discussion and disagreement between the Mayor and Council aid the developer and Engineer concerning the approval of the Preliminary map with the street changes. The block and lot numbers had also been changed since Preliminary approval at the request of the County Engineer, Mayor Glaisyer stated that at this particular stage, this plat was not acceptable to the Fire Department. For fire and police protection, it would be for the best interest to redesign a through N.W. 10th St. There was discussion,and a workshop with Department Heads before the March 3, 1980 meeting,was advised by the Mayor. The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Kingsford that the Final Plat Meadowview #2 be tabled until March 3, 1980. Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea, Orton, yea. Agenda 8 Barney Property - Noteboom Annexation, North of Cherry Lane. Wayne Forrey, J -U -B Engineer, and Kent Barney, owner, were present to request input on their patio home subdivision concept plan. Forrey described the concept: residential structure, large lots divided into half with one half of the unit going to the smaller lot, and fee simple. The zoning is "A" Residential; unique shape, 170 feet wide by 1330 feet deep. Adjacent to Meadowview #2 and Cherry Manor on the East and Leisure Lane on the West, the area to the West is unplatted and one acre estates. Two story duplex structures, lots are 80' wide X 120' deep. Units are about 1300 sq. ft. per unit, 100 sq. ft. of patio plus a single car garage. Units 1, 2 and 3 are in various configurations to reduce the vision impact. Property will allow only one street (N.W. llth) and development on one side (east side), rear yard setback would be approximately 60 foot setback, the front from 20 to 30 foot setback, side yard 15 feet between units. Full improvements would be made, the ACHD approves. There was discussion concerning the small patio size, the west adjacent area, water stub outs and parking. The density would be 6.36 upa. Also there was concern for street study for length and fire protection, possible landlocking and two car garages. Agenda 9 Meridian Place Subdivision #1 Earl Harmon was present to request permission to get Building Permits on lots for multi type structure intermixed with single family for Meridian Place Subdivision #1. Councilman Orton abstained. Harmon reviewed previous action and the approval of developing in three (3) phases. The intent at that time was single family dwellings and density of 3.42 in the particular 20 acres in question tonight. (#1) Harmon pointed out the proposed density for that area was R-8 (map referred to is not official, but proposed.) There was discussion concerning split lots, covenants indicating a new lot line would not have to have the Ordinance setback, and the 1350 minimum sq. ft. Harmon stated the price range would be approximately $80,000 to $100,000 for duplex. He stressed quality and the attitude of smaller economic dwellings. Engineer Smith stated that Federal Housing Administration and VA require re - platting if there is split duplex lots. I'll, ��d '� ^ F,:% �a , '" -," - -' S _ F n V�, 6 4 I , �,:"', 4 i wkl. , , :. a G t, MSR tC i 1-1 I. ql Y f Meridian Cit Hall .2 11 11 March 17, 198011 11 The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Brewer that the Council Grant k411 �t h a variance of the public hearing of Final Plat of Meadowvievr #2 and �. Plat be approved subject to review of City Engineer on the modificationtofhM.W. 11 I 11 loth Ave., that they come back to Council with any street scape plans on any f reduced square foots a under x and bounds to the City. 1 feet on 0' lot line and deeded Lot 1 by metes Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea. +z I ' §� , . Agenda r11 2 Joseph A. Tomko - T axi Input Tomko was present to request the Council's approval of providing a taxi cab and delivery service. Tomko had presented a draft stating the nature ur p pose of 11 11 � buisness, proposed operation, proposed rate structure, projected business expenses for a taxi cab and delivery service, legal administration, i and sample driver's report forms. personal references 1� (proposal on file with City Clerk) " jomko stated his definition of a late model car is between a roxima r pp tely a 1977 to II 980. He proposes a first class cab system in Meridian. He stated that liabilit insurance runs around $600.00 a year as taxi cabs are considered a hi h ris y 9 k. _� Judith Tomko exII plained their formula for the number of taxi cabs to be ' and asked the Council's permission for the right to place up to three (3) cabsainon service. Any additional cabs into operation would require further Council approval. r � �' Mayor Glaisyer requested a City License for each cab in service, adeouate ins r 11 and cars i n good condition. u ance Tomlo urged an adoption of a fair rate structure. The Mayor stated this is a private enterprise serving the public, he did not want �' the City in the situation as the go-between for setting limits. The use of "Meridian Cab Co."was discussed. i The Attorney stated that they have the right to name as such. �g a The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Kingsford that Jose h A. and .. ,;. p Judith 11 11. A. Tomko be granted the taxi cab licenses for three (3) taxi cabs to operate in ;:, the City limits of Meridian as proposed by Joseph A. Tomko. a � 1v ..} j Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea. Williams asked that the fee schedule be advertised as much as possible. �iu i" Agenda { 3 Hunemiller -Anderson Annexation Hearin x g -located approximately 2250 P1. Meridian Rd. John Matzinger, CTM Engineering, was present, representing annexation request in behalf of Dave Hunemiller and Steve Anderson. Matzinger distributed a packet jx explaining "this was a special annexation with zoning that will permit a planned unit development for townhouses. The propsed annexation is immediately north of James Court, 10.8 acres, consisting of units for sale, 0' lot line t e basis �' a subdivision would be created within this parcel, the individual tenants would >VI l ­ " "I I'll "�'..' 4. X% 2 �+ - a P ''""-gym "+y 11 � 11e„, 1as.� t, i _ r�, :. - --� - 11 ,,,, d7��� 'k �, . -1 - ICis tx ”', � '"' "" 11 I F c .o! r' r.�,�r ., °�y, s p �# t 3 +�' i �'0 - ��'�.,', I I � I �+"+' , � - ,--, '', � ­,;;� s �` :b e` aI 3i tee s `� •ml,,`e' '` x .:''yrs 'xea .� ... �,,n, 6` '*� v t' a u.�.. ., 4 w. ,tom.. I' :" s > s'W.G?e'. p"�i ,.�, er2 " �.: 9.-. sfb.41 t s�i�a ct� e� 4 �.. lirl,. std' xI I ,„ • r k, "'..'t >< � ,kgts.ri x ,b s 3 ,r r _ M1 Fx3s 11 11 f, a.'; � :. -., 5:' °�r'�' A§ t ' ¢rr 3�-%a" -,3'. . � �z`bt ,.`^'j'R k &fz . »c a . , , ,.' 'z ' : . r ... - r* <� • s��' k , •esu, . r s d�,'3 a , .. � . ,�� � ', li ..� `5!,t" e , ,r�, - N 1 .'' fz 3z �° Et Ft d: ,Few :r �. ,a a'} �� i, ` t� *� ' Ew'. , . A', ,x t� � a � � "Za + n�� a @. 3 x f W� V i,:a S Y F V�'l �4 E �y �. w) �,.'..�' i+Pe."' 4x;f o -s a'. .ak. ti n,'� f y -*r'2.i# �e*+3as. . �)',+'"`:: t �� , r 1 s a € �` s - `§' �I R x 1 V. 'r , # � '1111 w . !_, ' Nil _r�,, `�� - " ��, I I ,, 'i" -,,,�­,,�f`,�', , i ,7 s� t`t a•'v s i a •. ,3.E � , e r . _ .� �ti �„` � : 4100-111 �� . § , R'^Mht''. ' i} f 3 .'h '`*ri, e x ixf"� c z "ak` r .�a}i% aR� t v a7x..m "-�. s'.�•z f ,a 4r,.ara rtgnay� ,-'"'isr�;,'"` ,,., I. , �.., mix i <s:. #��� v., ;§ F ' o -k"'" ,� 5 Y - i' Y ` y X �$. _. -'eh"Y t 4. " io, A 3'' , q :._ $ �i -`_ •t T 1;1 r.,'t j.:.s+. ky,>r t x ..;4-:K �r e{. r aF'-tt '� :,t .�... r.* y w , t a 3.; t i , v �,, . 3 a�R cs x y 11 e 4 `, a , {M�r nuk rz x #' a ,,$,'"i3 lsk± a "' n:Yc; .;.;"} `' {,..yF. ',, *:. . vd,11 i4fm' t 'a,. S 's } R4 T 2' tt "i.' d 6 l x.`. *.r z`'s. S ' ,,, , W, . v - . , M u, v.: �3a , f„7�77 r � " 11 j'S°�.• 4 . x Y k xr"- .n ?x f as a'� �, r 3 , I 11 = s r , , yu p 1 c` � ­ " , I , � — - lr� ,1'��,�,,�,'t� f , i' s 'tiy . 'F ,•a •L,'."" {,< Lt my Irlma n;,#fit, 5 3,01, A ' i x3 �•"ak"O^� �' ' . " ,�" '1 �... y � s %t19 W 11 �'a t a lv ,lit "" 111­,� A-" � k, ',­'­,,'J'f­ I I �, I I � x, , ­, ', "' Boa,.. �t _<,� ,,r xscaORWAwliMr,,.s�" P3�., ._5; El March 17. 1QAn Meeting called to order by Mayor Joe Claisyer at 7:30 P.M. Councilmen present: Richard Williams, Grant Kingsford, Bill Brewer. Orton Jr. absent. Others present: Roger Sherwin, Bruce Stuart, Joseph A. Tomko, Judith A. Tomko, Roger Welker, Phil Harper, Jim Potter, Earl Ward, Vern Schoen, Mr. Chastain, Mrs. Chastain, Gary Smith, Paul Olson, Keith Barney, Robert Davis, Olive Davis, Roger Allen, Ray Sotero, Patsy Leach, Steve Gratton, Terry P. Smith, John Matzinger, Steve Anderson, Martin Fabricius, Alan G. Lance, Elaine Fotall. Minutes of the previous meeting approved as read. Meadowview #2 Final Plat. Al Marsden was present, representing Final Plat approval, Marsden stated that they proposed to extend N.W. 10th to Delmar and to request five (5) additional lots over Preliminary Plat approval. These lots are designed for 01 lot lines development. They also request modification of restrictive covenants to allow them in some cases, a unit of less than 1350 sq. ft., but this request is based upon further approval by the Council of the street scape design. Marsden dis- played the street scape concept. He explained staggering the setbacks of the units, fences out in front to create patio design, some units two story and one story to create variation in height, and landscaping. Marsden stated that with the variation request, they would come back with a specific approval for this kind of design. If they do not come back (to Council) for approval, they will go back to the original covenants which would be only the 1350 sq. ft. and 1200 so. ft. 0' lot lines. Marsden stated Lot 1 has been eliminated and a deeded instrument to the City, by metes and bounds. Lot 2 has been enlarged. Lot 1 has not become part of the plat. Curb and gutter at Lot 2 was discussed. Montee stated they would not pave street, but curb radius and stub utilities. Kingsford stated that it was discussed during the work session that the adjacent developer would have to improve the street, curb and qutter. Sewer line extension was discussed. Engineer Smith stated that the lift station was to be included as a separate bid item on their contract for the improvements within the subdivision (Meadowview #2) and then the City would reimburse them for the extension of that line. Hosac stated they would request a Motion and incorporate approval of the Meadowview #2 Final Plat and plans as modified and just bring them in for signature when they are through with the modifications. Smith agreed, except for the extension of the street. He had not seen the street, sewer or water plan. Marsden stated they will submit this for City approval and if it wasn't signed, this would be where the City control is. The Motion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Brewer that the Council accept the Final Plat of Meadowview #2 with the coniditon that they come back to Council for street scaping on any reduced square footage, that the City be deeded Lot 1 by metes and bounds, that the City Engineer has the review on the modifications of N W. 10th Ave. Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea. Attorney Crookston asked that the Mayor and Council reconsider Motion referring to the Ordinance passed requiring public hearing for Final Plat. The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Kingsford to reconsider the previous motion. Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea. r y 3 9 ji ar x �. y, „Ui511 p; 01 ! r iW�L ' :`w' .. r �.4-�.b : r : ^e a+ ice' '�' ' s n a�}01 _ 10 r '# s e r. 4 �1 n #= April 7, 1980 Meridian Cit Hall All items above were field adjustments that came abo17 ut and all are approvable ` with the exception of Meadowview #1 connection ($772.40) The Motion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Williams that Final Change Order #2, Contract 7, Galey Construction Co, Inc. in the amount of $16,067.23 be approved.° Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea, Orton, yea. Smith recommended approval of Final Pay Estimate #14, Galey Construction July 31, 1979 to April 4, 1980, in the amount of $21,014.84 and which includes Change Order #2. This Pay Estimate also includes Change Order #1, which was approved July 1978. The Motion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Williams that Final Pay Estimate , R #14Galey Construction Co, Phase III Interceptor Sewer Line Construction in the , amount of $21,014.84 be paid. T Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea, Orton, yea. Smith stated that the connection made by Galey Construction in Meadowview #2 y Lift Station ($772.40) was temporary until the sewer could be connected to the approximately Interceptor. The connection will involve an 8 line, 110 feet, app y $4,214.00, a cost the City would have to absorb. This would eliminate the lift station and maintenance. Smith felt the bid of H and K Construction was high and will check this quote. The sewer connection between Meadowview#1, and Phase II Interceptor needs to be done within this week. The $4,214.00 bid does not include removing the lift station on a lot in Meadowview, 20 feet deep and not an easement. The Motion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Williams to authorize the City Engineer Smith to negotiate not more than $4,212.50 for the sewer connection project and the removal of lift station in,,,Meadowview Subdivision. Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea, Orton, yea. Smith recommended.that the City take into consideration the documentable damages and release the difference between what the City presently retains and the damage amount to DVY Construction Company. There was not an exact figure available, but �.'Smith-stated it would be approximately $50,000.00. The Motion was made by Orton and seconded by Brewer that the City Engineer and Sewer Commissioner Williams itemize actual damages and draft a letter to DVY r Construction Co. and payment minus those actual damages. Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea, Orton, yea. 3, Engineer Smith reported that Idaho Sand and Gravel has completed park project with the exception of a. short space between the pavement and the gate. He requested that this be taken under advisement until the incompleted section is checked. Agenda 8 Beer and Wine License Transfer -Spud Hut. 4 Chief Sherwin stated that the application of Norman Hanson has been investigated and could find no legal reasons to deny. m The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Kingsford that the Beer and Udine License transfer be approved for,the Spud Hut, Norman Hanson applicant. Motion Carried:: Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea, Orton, yea. to f 1 + < f � x , �1 0 VT oll Pp f "J { 2 Y ot.ism PA Zi y r } �,, r .r Ea'" Agenda 1 0 0 1 Meeting - Meridian City Hall February 26, 1981 Special meeting called to order by Mayor Joseph L. Glaisyer at 7:30 P.M. Councilmen present: Richard Williams; Grant Kingsford; Bill Brewer; Rick Orton Jr. Others attending: Mr. and Mrs. James Tully; Ken Montee; Ray Kellogg; Lee Stucker; Foe Stucker; J. R. Kellogg; Phil Harper; Bill Manfull; Joe Simminich; Val McLamm; deal Eagar Meadow View #2 - Square footage requirements Hearing 40 Ken Montee was present to display Meadow View #2 Final Plat designating percentage square footage on each lot. Mayor: "Public Hearing is now open" Montee: "I am here to ask approval of Meadow View Subdivision No. 2 minimum square footages and I have a change in the restrictive covenants which specifies the square footages per lot." Montee displays map before Council. "There are ten (10) 1,000 nineteen (19) 1,100; thirty-nine (39) 1,200 and the rest are 1,300 square feet." Williams: "One suggestion off the subject if I may, in this area (indicating south- west area of the old sewer treatment plant) we are proposing that a neighborhood park be established, and we are working with Boise State regarding this - a park that would be a benefit to the whole neighborhood and to the property in here (Meadow View #2). When we get this project further along I would hope we could work with you on this park so you would have an idea what we are trying to accomplish. If possible, if we do develop a park, we could perhaps find someway of having access through here (indicates lots adjacent to park proposal). This is not a request but to find out if you people would be interested." Montee: "The draw back would be the narrow lots. If we do anything we would have to do it right away, because we have sold the lots" There was discussion -concerning access to the future park from Chateau Drive -area and sidewalks. It was decided that the lots were too tight for access. Mayor Glaisyer: "Are there any comments from the public attendance concerning Meadow View Subdivision No. 2?" Joe Simminich: "I'm Joe Simmintch and I am concerned about the irrigation system. I came here a few months ago and I asked you people to do something about it, or asked what you could do, I talked to Ken Montee - the irrigation box is still cut open and this summer the irrigation water will flood my property.. I cannot get anything done on it." There was much discussion concerning the responsibility of correcting the flooding problem. Montee: "Settlers Irrigation and our Engineer agreed upon a plan to cut a hole in this box (indicating east box) and drain it into 5 Mile Creek. Our Engineers informed us that BOR had an easement across here and it was their land. Two or three months later we found out that it was Mr. Simminich's land. H & K Contractors have been contacted to repair but cannot until it is less muddy.. We have hired H & K to fix or finish it. There is a problem getting it tapped into a storm drain system. It is an overflow problem, it really doesn,t have anything to do with us - the problem was there before the Subdivision was even thought of. We are going to close in the hole and hopefully tap into the storm drain. We did dig a ditch across his property and we did not know it was private property." Williams: "The City of Meridian has no control of irrigation - we do not have any- thing to do with this - we can't do anything." Montee: "We have an agreement with Settlers and the Engineer for this property to cooperate and make correction - we apologize, how it is going to be solved will be approved for Settlers Irrigation." Mayor: "Any more comments from the public?" There was none. The Motion was made by Orton and seconded by Williams that they approve Meadow View Number Two (2) proposed square footage requirements as presented, ten lots at 1,000 sq. feet; nineteen at 1,100 sq. feet; thirty-nine at 1,200 sq. feet and the remaining of Meadow View Number 2 Subdivision lots at 1,300 square feet. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea f «dug'" f` s�'0 RY At 1 4 '� ai k b 1 t 1. J p� �,• 't LR' k p x i �3� 4 iko A' Agenda 1 0 0 1 Meeting - Meridian City Hall February 26, 1981 Special meeting called to order by Mayor Joseph L. Glaisyer at 7:30 P.M. Councilmen present: Richard Williams; Grant Kingsford; Bill Brewer; Rick Orton Jr. Others attending: Mr. and Mrs. James Tully; Ken Montee; Ray Kellogg; Lee Stucker; Foe Stucker; J. R. Kellogg; Phil Harper; Bill Manfull; Joe Simminich; Val McLamm; deal Eagar Meadow View #2 - Square footage requirements Hearing 40 Ken Montee was present to display Meadow View #2 Final Plat designating percentage square footage on each lot. Mayor: "Public Hearing is now open" Montee: "I am here to ask approval of Meadow View Subdivision No. 2 minimum square footages and I have a change in the restrictive covenants which specifies the square footages per lot." Montee displays map before Council. "There are ten (10) 1,000 nineteen (19) 1,100; thirty-nine (39) 1,200 and the rest are 1,300 square feet." Williams: "One suggestion off the subject if I may, in this area (indicating south- west area of the old sewer treatment plant) we are proposing that a neighborhood park be established, and we are working with Boise State regarding this - a park that would be a benefit to the whole neighborhood and to the property in here (Meadow View #2). When we get this project further along I would hope we could work with you on this park so you would have an idea what we are trying to accomplish. If possible, if we do develop a park, we could perhaps find someway of having access through here (indicates lots adjacent to park proposal). This is not a request but to find out if you people would be interested." Montee: "The draw back would be the narrow lots. If we do anything we would have to do it right away, because we have sold the lots" There was discussion -concerning access to the future park from Chateau Drive -area and sidewalks. It was decided that the lots were too tight for access. Mayor Glaisyer: "Are there any comments from the public attendance concerning Meadow View Subdivision No. 2?" Joe Simminich: "I'm Joe Simmintch and I am concerned about the irrigation system. I came here a few months ago and I asked you people to do something about it, or asked what you could do, I talked to Ken Montee - the irrigation box is still cut open and this summer the irrigation water will flood my property.. I cannot get anything done on it." There was much discussion concerning the responsibility of correcting the flooding problem. Montee: "Settlers Irrigation and our Engineer agreed upon a plan to cut a hole in this box (indicating east box) and drain it into 5 Mile Creek. Our Engineers informed us that BOR had an easement across here and it was their land. Two or three months later we found out that it was Mr. Simminich's land. H & K Contractors have been contacted to repair but cannot until it is less muddy.. We have hired H & K to fix or finish it. There is a problem getting it tapped into a storm drain system. It is an overflow problem, it really doesn,t have anything to do with us - the problem was there before the Subdivision was even thought of. We are going to close in the hole and hopefully tap into the storm drain. We did dig a ditch across his property and we did not know it was private property." Williams: "The City of Meridian has no control of irrigation - we do not have any- thing to do with this - we can't do anything." Montee: "We have an agreement with Settlers and the Engineer for this property to cooperate and make correction - we apologize, how it is going to be solved will be approved for Settlers Irrigation." Mayor: "Any more comments from the public?" There was none. The Motion was made by Orton and seconded by Williams that they approve Meadow View Number Two (2) proposed square footage requirements as presented, ten lots at 1,000 sq. feet; nineteen at 1,100 sq. feet; thirty-nine at 1,200 sq. feet and the remaining of Meadow View Number 2 Subdivision lots at 1,300 square feet. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea f «dug'" f` s�'0 RY At 1 4 '� ai k b 1 t 1. J p� �,• 't LR' k .4. Februar 2, 1981 Meridian Cit Hall application of Orton: "I think I consider this a uniform application - a consistant i our waterworks" The Motion was made by Orton and secondedby aserecommendedr that eby the 1BoardtofhAppraisers apalication for water and sewer hookup s for'Rocky Mountain Meat. Motion Carried; Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea= Brewer, ,yea; Orton, yea There was discussion concerning methods of informing applicants of charges before installation. Agenda 4 Meadow View No. 2 - Ken Monteeing of the Montee: "The purpose as to why I am here this even and etla clars to ification approvalest cationon part of square footage basis an our 1 Pi �states that these units be designated per lot and we the ordinance, The ordinance would like to know if there is any consideration given to switching one lot to another once that designation is named.'' ?"" "Are you going to bring in a plat Mayor "How are we going to administer that. every time you do this? ve Montee: "I don`t know how we can do it f them aeve re "ssubjectvto" clarificationof actually signed earnest money and some o get a build .job for a certain ' this ordinance, the question has come up that if they sized hause,and they only have so many lots and a buyer would like to have another lot. what could we do? The ordinance bly we couldso ncometinare andathe rbuildtain �ingcdepartment of square footage and we thought possiblymonitor could. change lots "to such and such" the b oli^drestrna ictiveecovenants - which tlot �and Kingsford: "��ouldn°t this end up being in y block to be which size?" Montee: "At this time we have not redrafted tOriaeinallytweewecovenants gobecause ing to draft not know how they are going to be drafted." t them 10% of the lots would be 1,000 square feet, 20% 1,100 - then we have to designate each lot building restrictions. you have one lot with 1,000 Mayor: "I think what you are talking about for example, y if foot the builder comes in and wants to change heacan gowaheadeandgdonthat.�pgrade square interpretation is that ' that square footage higher, my ,, "But you can't go down." "� people would be buying specific lots knowing what would Williams; My biggest conern, p_ p foot lot and had bought those lots under be next to them, and if someone had a 1300 sq. thatremise - if that premise changed in the middle,I would be concerned about that 4 ° p i Mayor; "The other thing too is that you have to have a public hearing on that. ,If you want to upgrade, fine." lots could not be monitored just 'by { Montee: "Then the square footage for soay are issued couldn't you say "no more once that many lots, or when building permits 1,000 sq. footage lots?" le Mayor; ,If you have a pulat blic hearingand toomakewanchangeothere isunopsense having ' if you amend the plat every time y ou nging in now, public input on it. "When you bring in your°uttonlrecord ufor ethe 1building permitou f have to have one public hearing - and that �s p When you come in for permits the building inspector can check off the lots."lot There was much. discussion concernin ,I g a buyer that has a plan not fitting proposed ^i blic hearing and how the subdivision relates to and switching, the function of a pu the surrounding property. ange i'n the plat Mayor Glaisyer read from the Ordinance No. 3P atti9 prshall ocedure and only the City e considered as a new platting for purposes of81n Council need act on such request'' Montee stated that he felt the building 1seeect r that control caught in the footage. Kingsford stated that he could crossfire "If the people who live adjacent to lot change do not came hi g" "If the are going to show up later questioning the City"s amending something" " 4gendz I it they require an amendment, Just action of the Council, then there wouldn't 5 be notice for mai J.ng `Jk,d be di,sturb.ed if Iwas next door to the one that originally Wos, going to be 1?300 and ends up 1100.' ntee, "'I' uess our problem i,s we have builders public heato ring re-reas cording n as eplate, what we can do here, If we have to go.tmrOuIderstanding was that this would go on `' we are looking at a longer time frame Y Meridian City Hall 7. December 15, 1980 Agenda 7 Other Business Mayor: "Is there anyone in the public that wishes to discuss anything before the Council moves on to other business?" Orton: "I see Mr. Quong is here. Do you have any questions?" Quong: "I thought we were going to have a hearing?" Orton: "Since our attorney has not reviewed the agreement, there probably isn't any purposeful discussion we can have at the meeting." Mayor: "Not as far as I'm concerned, until we can get recommendations." Agenda 8 Appointment of Planning and Zoning Members Mayor: "I would like to appoint three members to the Planning and Zoning Commission. I appoint Lee Mitchell to a two year term; Burl Pipkin to a four year term; and Don Sharp to a six year term." The iMotion was made by Williams and seconded by Kingsford to appoint Lee Mitchell to a two year term; Burl Pipkin to a four year term; and Don Sharp to a six year term. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. Agenda 9 Roger Sherwin, Chief of Police Resignation Mayor Glaisyer read letter of resignation of December 8, 1980, and accepted this resignation. He stated that he and the Police Commissioner will accept applications after the first of the year." Agenda 10 Engineering: Smith presented two bills and recommended payment. The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Kingsford that the bill from H -K Contractors, Inc. for installation of sewer line on Chateau Ave. in Meadow View #2 in the amount of $4,212.50 be paid. Motion Carried: William, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Kingsford that payment be made to Ted R. Brown and Associates for the packer stack from the construction fund in the amount of $559 - - this being a project deductible amount being withheld from DVY Construction. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. Agenda 11 Other Business: Mayor Glaisyer read Amended Ordinance #375 entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE VII, CHAPTER 3, ENTITLED HEALTH AND SANITATION OF THE REVISED AND COMPILED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, BY CORRECTING A MIS- SPELLED WORD AND ELIMINATING THE WORD SEWER FROM THE BODY OF SECTION 7-312 ENTITLED METHOD OF COLLECTION. The mayor called for anyone requesting Amended Ordinance #375 to be read in full. There was no request. The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Kingsford that the rules and provisions of 50-9002 and all rules and provisions requiring that ordinances be read on three different days, be dispensed with and that Amended Ordinance Number 375, as read, be passed and approved. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. rIt, Ykldlii 1'. 3 e + F I I 1 i I �iir Augast r Meridian City Hall .2. Plus $3• per onth a charge per unit' Above payments shall be id prior to completion Of lli or obile homer, ; stand Commer6ial or Industrial evelo eat shall be set on in J. Tia upon application to e y o c . , ye tw Motion passed: Ski er, y ;Ellis, yea; Navarr Bo ne ab ent I, A os ctive o o er c templati chase f la fro Bora Wiley ' d rk "I (the lot on West 2nd in a 700 block ,spoke up to a k h oun w y e the was not issued a sew r ho k it. He stated that had come efore City Clerk and reque ted sews hook up permit. r. Mr. Skiver stated t the was the City Hall at the time and ed the' to what Js to lac d on clerk that t lot. The City Clerk requested his information in ting but not mayor Storey stated hat t wo d be unfair to allowyoato.;h okto Aber' ; sewer the same day t e 0% nci consider a n buy up in adva a to costi ,. get i on thea, 1r Subdividers would t to come and bargain_ a a vaace. �;'� i, ;. ,.4 (kT Bid for painting out ids f wat r tower was preaeate Bid by Y d ung Kid - ` ------------- 8una, n the amount f This matter was d over to Ellis the Water ie Loner _turn No action was taken. �. r I , I, f, The hearing was hold for one a ages as requested d as 4. I } ublis -�, e a ey Newa a an n no ce o one ear ng as a', a these minutes for th following �- -- ' Gre c Subdivi ion nit s NAN Corporation Property "A side ti�►1 a,, Nort to Subdi ilio a 1 rt conventional for a Mobile Ho a Far perm • 4, part "A" Resi at pro this a orato sed ium on Mobile Rome tall *Lone present Note Corrid r A exati n d 4 Bloc0--70-t.`A, onrse " Sun Ra Dain " " Co era 1 for lots ' Second additions discussion of the Corr dor ratfutuion, Mr..Notebo sta ed t the desired On mso 0, i t . TAe.. LD Mr. Noteboom was inf rmed by -t Council that no a s encs re4i,1 could be, ;iia a►ie The Cit Attorne as ed him t t this a enation Via, not remav ylr Corridor from his co trol The City was only: coned ng done ci�aag¢ ,"' annexation. S'IMMM Th® Cityhas a Tette fr Mr. h e ti ' otebocm requesting s S rIt, Ykldlii s e� 3 I I t i� C r �. �• .Special 'Moetir� Jia, 12,i ���AI / e eb1 to the 'hi.ghest bidd `r, C R. S t Isar $27.1.20 , vier that the ru.c 1�yr 'I 13 s. 1: v6tad y'eao I 1 f 3®vex�� rda er' ev,alo exp neer Ahd' caltara� were,' Ir sent tcy Id�;�' cuss, plans for l u ,'. � dor thdir virions' new bdiiii r'` Store 1 6- ,Mayoij tate that. present well i eel,, xe dot a ei tat+ tCx' up 1 a O �p�e'ci�.blc increase, -7-77' baba -Upso 'and that it exit into �; E Ih ';+a' tYiet new ;su vi loins ho z: io their mr, �. die ` ;d iderae the lie level para ' 't'c �. 7 on d a7.e c .scuss bre b Fby ' 'a1ve €�nct;;come°'� the �m�lawi ro sa s at the 1. u1c� commit � 1 i e1vs'e- aml le home:`sl aria1 d that s a u i'4 was finall ;� '�. ' duan e 1 h4a ��� cha#� a ,giY0.0 dor ach' h6 s aiad5n 00 C ,1e; , ira to ira .cl be fila , i1ab1 t ,this City '1446h idld lbw ° hp Cit to e har waiad 1a�te ire re4i ed td' eao home ae . t3"'h alp � cd,� or dva cue " e �t ee '� a utv ant? the 1 1do11L�.y �G� '. �'r �?d� A i�TQ I I• .I d 1 y ' ✓+'✓ 4 f FI F( i 7 I I ,i ,1, mtni.''' e'ti5t t 1 w l o qilitious OM ;. +1 I t �.77 I 1 1 I t`- P6' `priovedr. fi 1pp'er;,,bave to `etas' wit hie advan e' s�ammaLtment., ,I ' 1 ,�1 r' ' � .I ( I p I u 1 4 1 , � 1 I r' I ao jn$City; i f ul. I I 1 A � t i 5. , rl ii 1 f I 1 A"n P ,, "• `* ,<i '`< ...-i` ,.., :, '' (. , ,`,'.. �:;; �� �F I Y,s ,:'ia' 4 1 a ",7 1 i '. 1 r 1;,: If I�rf,�'t>' '+� Ix }Sl, `rz�-.. .,... ,yR,r.. ., ., :� '.:',i,-,.,. ,., , ,.,. .a.. .,v n :::, a ., /-;�,.}, ; d'k•/ -',"C :, C`, r 1 r y{ .. x. >.., i:,: ;:. 1 ..:.. � ,.. ,r. ,.... A.i... i :;:', '.:':t ;I'' r ,r •';: i ,.,_., ,.:. r. :4,,.:, ,,, ,y�7., , �}'r,., rl ,., l,,-.., ,.•..,..111 I i r 1➢ 3 I w...r.. .%',. ..e .. , ' .. ,, , Y.. .. ,:: r r ,,. ?"`'i ,. F"9. ,, .. � -.,. , I. - ,!_1.. r:'. -.,.: ,,•.. 'lt'' •.�1.,; 1.,1 r •� � ,;.. k.,. ,. ,-„ ,.arr?,. ,: ``.8� ., ., v.. :r,..::.: ., .. ,., ,; „,P,.,., a�..,u. 'L. .r. r $ :.a; ;�:t. NI: 1 .a w I{, M1 'tr,'h ,, ,.. r,.. .q :,. t, r. ,,.. , :. F.l ,.. ,, :,. ✓, r:'3: ,rl .. -,. ,.i..,, :2 .,.4 '! , '•'i,i, ,.,�i�. .. +{M "ti 'i 111 ..:. .,. a..-; ,. ,. i , ., �.. .rV .. ;:,.. ;. t'-. , n,•, ,k ,,.. ,p..,, :9., r t.,,..r,. !f'+� a,r I„ , r {: ,�r, 3. r:. r,.1. .t.. ➢ .{L:..yd ,!�. ;.>- ., , - � ,,.b. ,,�" , :. a,w. I � , ,.:.✓- nd. ,-,. .. Ir ,.. I ..r T ,�, d...} a .1 :r -r 1 r ,+d ?':" .� 'vi% ,r. .. .r ,• -, � ....... ., �`?w. � .I. .: ,...r. v. ,i .r. r. ,. .. , ,:'. „ I , _+,v} ...: :, r-,; I, 1. 'rc r. :ti';, 1",5 r.. I ,"> � t!':'i J era::' J � ,u g.!. l�iFf In t ,�., -', a, , .:::. , ;. ,1 .. ,.j� ,�>,.,n,.. t. L's ,,, , ,:;,. v -, ,�., ,i. , :,::; .Cc •, rr iFr., ^`.i' l.u. ,. ,. ,,.�.. _ "s . e , _. .,l`� i N-. ..4t, 'r; .., .�-. t.. . ,., I ..! ..: .. :' {,..,} . .. ., t,. `h,•: Y:: f +1, t. 1 ,. �, a ,or ... ,..,,. ,. ,::� �� :.. � .. .. u.. a. , ._.: 5. .., ,, ,- •. ,- ,. , .7 . .,.... , ... r.. ,: �;h., 1 r I }1 r e d„. ,. v, d 1. ,, ; I,:.7,.r, i. .,c _,,,i ,t- , - ., ,. ,, _,,,:. , , I ➢ r °..1 -.r„ k'. ;➢. • , t. y. d:: ” � �• ,re „id s, ...: ) ... r;,, ...; .,. ...r _r r..,. , Vii' 'Cs •, ; r.„. ,. :' i 'r,i, .1r r• :< <.. ..,,, � .,;, •-. arr, ,. r,� a ,.. ,�. +r�n. �.d r -;.,.� :..;;. :, r :, .., i ,:'} w r, Ps Y,�1 ,� 7,., ,v' a a Y .f�l. I i , !S , r:1d` � -S ..t..,ir. x , .+ ]....,8 � . Kw.,i'.5; irY �' , �Y,�.,. r_;,. i. t ,..:,k:..;r , :: ,;j I,, ., i i,, .,.;{ •I �' ','. r.!, i.}' ,,:>}Ej'., rA-� p� y�r /�!yr 'jam L !/�� ,/+� uu wrest 'j ` 111 . s.✓: ', l��ol lir' ➢ � :., 1 }t y:J r, %�9@'� M�J.�'My YIV��RY'r QZ"r•�� $�iQ q�l. "����, �YAf�. '�'�VTF l' I �: it t .. e�eu'� c W.° H� H�l.+n gai�h ElT a Msirvi' ' Hod n ht2 . t'. "`i x' F :I t 71�, a h'.. .:C•' ' r s '-'t r..^r , . ' � i , ,' i-'o °. �' a'7 f , .,'til: a _ ! j , , d , ' ' ! t ^, I },, },., r t:b. % s k+ ., ➢., .as.: „Ne� '. � r a.JR 'e .3:4 . n e �i �' t � 1 -� �� �1. F�.a�ee, Ra Yar , , I,, , r , ,`'. � �,` Y 7 � a➢ Vp t Wil ardR rle `t So ,. I�Ih mGr",.� ��� �(.� �l,r➢o ilr ,' 10.1.- !;, 9f i , L: b}, � u ,C`O'�i0�1 B rSlBt e, Y S a / 01 �yS a�.s �y Y fi ®��Rl�nil'�B�B�'L°!'�! �@®�' G4�. Oviedo,. iiV � � `* rk ,,,i;f• } *1 }?t 3n u'#n. 2�,na5 f��`^`F �,7 y"oaf f t1/d E�p' Pop ly,j:j s T�" 4 r.1 •7 ' ° $ i1 F�: l��f•, ;1%�I n a. a>"r it�ilr r1t9. ItYie �: Legioa�r�d V ��r'a B'. �� 4�i�e9.Ft��1, �., ars � cuu n ;rlpga@ tF hey '�Ppor o t e mem res o s : ounc tr, A� + i� Q @ �.n _! '�%'�il'�B O$I' A M D at. ® a 3 �ooper+a�e ” �'d •par paI 3' A CBIS �i ' O 1L1A03' � 0dead., � S A!! OZ' E'r0, afg a � " i➢�1 �� r h " � renewed ar@s �.n �� � �t�mo��.' The �2't a! e l ho ,Si4R�d, '� � kti` Yyl➢;a ° 4^ ���, s ,• r 1�` R Y 4 �.^hy i �`r-lu:'r. r ,wia�w..Lw�•., _,��`r..�4r+� : �a a /{�p�y a.■ 1�y�. �����'�4 : M0�7� � �YQ � }� fir.. , g,r.ar f � st� 1 ;�>I ., �, ai1'YG[�Ii�+l#'r'iYracar ,i`.� j.� r� F�r�� �Xv�ia1�➢ '19k 1 � ! IWir �,I , '' ,.: .•,:.! g `_, .;N a ,,.:., *.. .-., (N} ,;•y. ti ti. =:I:-r`10 =:r ��:�.+i f`.�d: ,! ,t r!, .:: ?, " .' r;, t '•,. ,� ;,' :;1:; ;�P'i�, . ,'a 4., ,. 7i ?e➢,. i'.�. }i'.i=k+°'� r I:��,'; a n. 5 �:::�.r : ' 7 ,. , • � I'': ,r I t��' 10041:10� � rsi ���i � A 3 i�s � a►:' �,wsv,' � rhes l�a�zi 'Su � ea�a � ox► � � ee � tom' ,�' � :rl � ���� �. 0 ty QA 7�41� IV, : ��) ��E� '•I 4�k1:1 6 F "` �1 !/S- ift• d M. ` i�laise�d,; re sling a'� 14 W� 3tora� ,pve., b all a r ids➢:, a*I I t-➢�,hN'9 ,,�•u �r ,' s.5Sao 4, 66 tt ^ice' 1 {S,t ��;s{I ]7•, ir� m ,.,it?q ,fr€.. 1 ! _..:, .i I ! t < _ Y .;Ic �T *cY o n vr;r. vim- r r➢r p,Sr 1 r :j! h�i1..lI. I. :i y.. .aJa"#,'. � ,x ,:,: ,,,. ..,-` h i � �",. w"L�jr ,..,., i r ,:, ra.; 'E. � 8 a �i•; ,,, 4 1 �'+.,. ' =' ogOr'�y 1y3� W@;�t . th4 � �e�s$ '� �r�wea� d%�pos�l �l � t � r- s'�.Yiki'. � � gas io�r�r��� pr�At@ a `1e'. ted a ��h�r �a r <4 =4 7•7 i i 6�H a @ .. r ''• ! #wsi a ,1 'n � :� h d r � �iii�'. i.1 0" B�'�,Q1� � " 1� ✓�a��"'it q,11'j:d7 Irk{1 I ,r .�'.'P� s{, a•' � �},�1'. ° i-r��`; f �{- ! ,_.S _Mite QQ� M�._1$.� '�:,�, ,r _ , � F�'�`,�� �au►e�a��.Qn. His� lett r a1 � ob p�r�sse�,�. iii�y, ,Z' �t�'1 '�Gi�'.�� �' E9�'�.On, T@81� i3GJrm n y'too ell .ik, � 7fi1.Y �IRM;�11 '4V� {!�V �VPJ,fi� 114, ,iM���TV� .�41�4�Y!�fFG �� , �FR� .{ir �;'�r d'kr td d d 1, ,:t,� r •I,', I' 's°YJ ct ! {; iq�R��n ?}I! 1 f'1M i.t '•{2•. �' � ��T^ �'* r (..^ 'a { I 1' II�':Ilr ,>N°. y . .a :. .;� ..w,.q }'hr' r$ 1,111 Y1 f 1 J �l+ r � ��I.• I iy.,f' by q.r�:, �' a � y�n x ;''� ,{ I y. � , '::e• I , .:`: t Il+�i i �,�,Y r ,-y'. ;t` V , 1 { �. _,a,, t r v ` ii s° s�''`"kt, �� k •'-3:., � ^#,::� w§��'"r�"�, ^�,' ,•`� �`z'"a'�'k-Fs�cK�n'<��NI a' ?'{�„� '-'r"'"" w r �.` •, ,. ::'� � ..,:,, * �i .s.: "�a �^ ..;,.,. y;, ,r ,_ ,,.s' ,s, �'3�r � 'F.,y,ss�`, rb �,: •a>ix, :;¢, � fir',');{$ „ny'eX.S} 'm . A 2 6 ;:�i �:� �, k ':,.�' �rd°tL��:sk. , }. �' 4 :�firr`� ak �.� � �a •12i3Fx. a ¢ ta s.'`'�a �,,:%,+, s'�" $. � �,r�> ,r„ w, #`� d; < ,g.,za, �i. : ,#••'»t� �' .�: w��^k'� ��t r�..Y 5 s} �r 't`Y`wP'� ��uk a !. ;,i6 x�r',.�,.�';ir''� , . 4*sk ti a'�5�� yv Ott nart?, s ,3 yep ^e x. � > :� 3.b F� r3' S .i' ,,,:5 v, �➢� r . � '�"'w , ,.- � .�, � frr :t.,�. t' 4�;� £ U4� ` "":*� �r %�-,��."" i ::moi '.�'?`�, I°^"Y•'p,� �: yS }'^� shy ,,�, 3';• .c ` ty+7', *j"1r'➢J"�': J '� ,F F i '`fit-t xw`✓N` �,,;: (S"t^r "1'• I 4 *-4;, ............ 64 I �- — - I — - _--=-a-- a Owen Frost carom sf Ni norhlubdivi 1 to re uest w a fo_ his roperty gv�ft Weion area. He ns to Ovide 11 000 s ft - lots on a 40 acrea t act. 94 1 ta_which are to be e ine red central water._-_.-_-__- Nir. b'rocit dusired to know1wh.othe water could be nuPe iWd Lind ho lar¢_e a -line� wouldtie, .r0 (jtdved to serve his proposed development and stated that to ins tall I,. lift "trit i on to go into the City sewer w,i8 too expensive. Meridian City Hall .2. March 1, 1971 Nlayor stated that the City h s a policy that if sorvices aro xtended, bath water and sewer st be arranged for tbroug the City tilities. Special onsidleratio# might be arranged but o inane s I+ gIzire all in the C ty toi be connected to the City and pr cedur:s require hat annexation to C ty iso a re4uirement of servicesf F The Mayor stated tha this matte would require additional studylbefore he Council could reach a answe� as to whether the ute of ;City Water ould be ranted and that e wou d be informed of the pro ess in this _ g -- - -info- me of p matter. -- nnie Littlefield came before t e Council to discuss and�'ompla' n about he trash from Jethrq l s an1d the titer that f lows onto { his roper y from his area. _ Mr. Littlefield stat d th P y I J - ' _ ry alt trash collects -on his ro ext 'from ethro s � I� Dr and that ev time the wind blows he has to11clear up his yard n order to mow the "a., i The Mayor stated- that if here -_are- v ol.ati-ona of- tras-ordinancep a co ca should be filed at the' City Hall where the ecess,ary a6tion fn be in the Cit a It was poin ed _out that -litter o di cee a in an be taken, City 4 vi lation that are lodged wil be rosac�.ted. Littlefield stated th+ e street and --frQm the r+ come down and look ove: where the water-gpes._- e Council decidedo to uld be taken. axles Kellogg come befo e South end of 3rd stre esenting a petition sig at area. Petitioi on e Chief of Police as i re frequent patrol in ght-of-way. t the surfacewater problem that flows off of of-_ e . ro Is ®nds _up__in- - ya#. _said when it is raining and it could1be cl ar as into this matter_to-ascertain 4hat-a e the Pouncil to request a t adjoining the railroad ri ed by the residents and_ pro ile with these minutes. by --the Police_ -Comm of Broadway and Wes ion----- - - tree ] igh at ht -o$ -way, by e rty ovne in------ sio er to make --- - 3rd to th railroad T Th le -- - ire - - t t --- C I De — t -- - �D i - — - c — tr. - - - tc - tc — -- cc CYC ti; px -- m -- — — ri Nlayor stated that the City h s a policy that if sorvices aro xtended, bath water and sewer st be arranged for tbroug the City tilities. Special onsidleratio# might be arranged but o inane s I+ gIzire all in the C ty toi be connected to the City and pr cedur:s require hat annexation to C ty iso a re4uirement of servicesf F The Mayor stated tha this matte would require additional studylbefore he Council could reach a answe� as to whether the ute of ;City Water ould be ranted and that e wou d be informed of the pro ess in this _ g -- - -info- me of p matter. -- nnie Littlefield came before t e Council to discuss and�'ompla' n about he trash from Jethrq l s an1d the titer that f lows onto { his roper y from his area. _ Mr. Littlefield stat d th P y I J - ' _ ry alt trash collects -on his ro ext 'from ethro s � I� Dr and that ev time the wind blows he has to11clear up his yard n order to mow the "a., i The Mayor stated- that if here -_are- v ol.ati-ona of- tras-ordinancep a co ca should be filed at the' City Hall where the ecess,ary a6tion fn be in the Cit a It was poin ed _out that -litter o di cee a in an be taken, City 4 vi lation that are lodged wil be rosac�.ted. Littlefield stated th+ e street and --frQm the r+ come down and look ove: where the water-gpes._- e Council decidedo to uld be taken. axles Kellogg come befo e South end of 3rd stre esenting a petition sig at area. Petitioi on e Chief of Police as i re frequent patrol in ght-of-way. t the surfacewater problem that flows off of of-_ e . ro Is ®nds _up__in- - ya#. _said when it is raining and it could1be cl ar as into this matter_to-ascertain 4hat-a e the Pouncil to request a t adjoining the railroad ri ed by the residents and_ pro ile with these minutes. by --the Police_ -Comm of Broadway and Wes ion----- - - tree ] igh at ht -o$ -way, by e rty ovne in------ sio er to make --- - 3rd to th railroad