Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutACHD Commentst ~~~~~ H D Carol A. McKee, President Sherry R. Huber, 1st Vlce President Rebecca W. Amold, 2nd Vlce President ~ioec~~o Sr~ivice John S. Franden, Commissioner Sara M. Baker, Commissioner March 16, 2009 ~ ~~ T~ p 1 F/ To: Ed Kundla ~A~ ~ ~ ZQQ~ Key Bank 2025 Ontario Street, 4~' Floor CI COLEI2~OFID~FICrE Cleveland, Ohio 44115-1028 Rep: Mark Rossiter (sent via email) CSHQA 250 N. 5~' Street Boise, Idaho 83702 Subject: MCUP-09-001, MDES-09-001 Key Bank branch with drive-thru 3270 N. Eagle Road, Meridian, Idaho On 19 October 2004, the Ada County Highway District acted on MPP-04-037 Ustick Marketplace Subdivision (now Smitchger Subdivision). The conditions and requirements set forth in that action also apply to MCUP-09-001 and MDES-09-001. Prior to final approval you will need to submit construction plans to the ACRD Development Review Department to insure compliance with the conditions identified above or for traffic impact fee assessment. This is a separate review process that requires direct plans submittal to the Development Review staff at the Highway District. A traffic impact fee will be assessed by ACRD and will be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Contact ACRD Planning ~ Development Services at 387-6170 for information regarding impact fees. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact this office at (208) 387-6187. Sincerely, Matt Edmond Planner III Right-of--Way and Development Services CC: Project File Bill Parsons, Meridian City Planning Department (sent via email) Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208-387-6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achd.ada.id.us y %a _ ,. J~. r .. . ~ ~., ' :~~~' ~'. ~':'.~ . w ~. . - .. .. +' f' y, ~~ -;~~: ~.,. -M. ; fa~~~ ~- ,: ,~L, Y ~~ ~~ "' `<.a ~_ ;~ ;nub ~;~~; ,;, ~ '' -:~ ~:.; ~~`: Nti:t' Ei~!` Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of--way. 2. Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within any ACHD roadway or right-of--way. 3. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 5. Comply with the District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy. 6. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 7. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACRD Ordinances unless spec~cally waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 8. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 9. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 10. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. 11. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 12. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 13. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. a'c'rx ;r; + ~ ~''~ ,;,;: :> '~: 5s w z ~ :. -~~:, Request for Appeal of Staff Decision 1. Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual. a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. L ` .... ~~ . ~ .. j 1; ~:~i!i,. ~~~.. rr ~; °;v: `5,:_ iii:°~ =,, ~z,,~: ?=; ~ ,-? ~: ~;:<< ":4 ;' ;, . ~t'4 ~~~: r~. , v; ' ;_ ;' -,_- Y ~ {. '3' R- ~" ``t „,:: r', `h' ,r~~.:<i ,, f.; .~~ ;_w :.. 'y1 Ci }~._ '1 1 Development Process Checklist ®Submit a development application to a City or to the County ®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD ®The ACRD Planning Review Division will receive the development application to review ®The Planning Review Division will do one of the following: ^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific requirements at this time. ®Send a "Comply With" letter to the applicant stating that if the development is within a platted subdivision or part of a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development also apply to this development application. ^Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ®The Planning Review Division will hold a Technical Review meeting for all Staff and Commission Level reports. ^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" or "Comply With" letter. • The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development Review Division for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation.) • The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of- way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. ^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOU REMEMBER: Construction (Zone) ^ Driveway or Property Approach(s) • Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. ^ Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way • Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application" to ACHD Construction -Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisions) ^ Sediment>~ Erosion Submittal • At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Con an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction -Subdivision to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD Drainage Division. ^ Idaho Power Company • Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. ^ Final Approval from Development Services ACHD Construction -Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services prior to scheduling aPre-Con. ty=;, ~~~~~. Jahn 3. Franden, Presiderrt David E. Wynkoop 1st Vice President Susan S. Eastlake, 2ru! Vice President Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Dave Blvens, Commissioner October 20, 2004 3 N. Adams Street Garden ity ID 83714.8499 Ph ne (208)387-8100 AX (208)387.8391 E-mail: tellu ®ACHD.ada.td.us To: Ustick Market Place. LLC 12601 West Explorer Drive, Suite 200 Boise Idaho 83713 Subject: Ustidc Market Place Subdivision / MPP-04-037 11-vommercial subdivision NEC Ustick Road and Eagle Road On October 19, 2004, the Ada County Highway District acted on your applica8on fo referenced protect. The attached report lists site-specitlc requirements, conditions of a street improvements, which are required. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 208-387-6177. Andrea N. Tuning u // / Planner III (~~ Right-of-way 8 Development Services, Planning Division CC: Project file, Construdbn Services, Drainage, Utilities City of Meridian Earl Mason 8 Star>field 314 Badiola Street Caldwell Idaho 83605 Ada County Highway District above al and .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A~ Ada bounty Highway district Right-oJ-Way & Development epartment Plannin Revie Division Thls application does not require Commission action due to the fact that the applicant previo~ MCZC-04-053 on Augur 18, 2004. This item is approved on Tuesday October 19, 2004. Ply attachment for appeal guidelines. Staff contact: Andrea N. Tuning, 208-387-6177, 208-387-E atunin~r a_achd.ada.id.us Flle Numbers: Ustick Market Place Subdivision I MPP-04-037 Site address: Northeast comer of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) and Ustidc Owner/Applicant: Smith Brighton 12601 West Explorer Drive, Suite 200 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Representative: Earl, Mason and Stanfield 314 Badiola Street Caldwell, Idaho 83605 Application Information: The applicant has submitted an application to the City of Meridian requesting preliminary plat construct an 11-lot commercial subdivision on 36.93-acres. 'The site is currently zoned C-G. acre site is located on the northeast cmmer of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) and Usfidc Roa Acreage: 36.93-acres Current Zoning: C-G Buildable Lots: 11-10ffi Common Loffi: 2-l0ffi Vicinity Map w.~ _:~~ t~ .1 .~'.' 1 acted on ~ reefer to the approval to The 36.93- d. ~~~` ti~; . 2~ 4' ~ h, 4 r _ i _.~ ....... __. Y a 1. 2. 3. Findings of Fact Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 5,060 vehicle trips per d y (including the existlng Lowe's Home Improvement Store) based on the submitted traffic impact st dy. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance f a building permit. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in ed at that time. Traifla Impact Study: A traffic impact study was submitted with this application. The submitted traffic study is for the entire site which is antidpated to contain a future Lowe's Home I provement Store, several other retail pads and a future muitl-family housing complex. The tn~ffic tudy was complied by Earth Tech Engineers. The following information is the execxJtive summa of the submitted traffic impact analysis. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The site is proposed north of Ustidt Road and east of State Highway 55 (Eagle Ro d) in Meridian, Idaho. The site is estimated to have 358,000 square feet of shopping center and 56 multi-family residential units. Eagle Retail development is projected to be complete by 2010. • This site is projected to generate an ext®mal aven3ge daily traffic (ADT) of 10,8 5 vehides per day, an AM peak traffic of 272 vehicles per hour, and a PM peak traffic of 945 vph. • Results from site traffic distribution indicate the foNowing traffic patterns: • 15°!o Of the site traffic is projected to have origins/destinations west Of the site and travel on Ustidc Road west of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) • 20% of the site traffic Is projed~ to have origins/destinations east of the site and travel on Ustidt Road east of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) ^ 35°~ of the site traffic is projected to have origins/desttnations south of the site and travel on State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) south of Ustlck Road ^ 30°k of the site traffic is projected to have origins/destinations north of the site and travel on State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) north of Ustidc Road • At build out year 2010, this site is projected to add approximately 3,400 vpd on S to Highway 55 (Eagle Road) and Ustidt Road, which is approximately 9°!0 of the total traffic Ott S e Highway 55 (Eagle Road) and 21 % of the total traffic on Ustidc Road. • Asa 5-lane prindpal arterial, State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) is projected to have sufficient capadty to accrommodate the long-term traffic growth and site traffic generat by this site. Auxiliary lanes maybe requin3d at intersections. • By 2010, Ustidc Road would need to be widened to three lanes east of State Hig y 55 (Eagle Road) with or without site traffic. • By 2025, Usddc Road would need to be widened to three lanes west of State Hig way 55 (Eagle Road) and four lanes east of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) with or without site c. • At build out year 2010, this project is projected to contribute approximately 10% f the total PM peak traffic at State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) and Ustldc Road inten,edlon. 2 ~a w~:~. ^ 1 ; ~ ~ ~; ' ~; . j~ . t ~~: '.t4 f ~ ~< ': ,;j ~~~ f j. '. °r x 4~ ~; f .~ ..:,: i~+ i .i 's T ~ 3 ~~ • Stat® Highway 55 (Eagle Road) and Ustidc Road intersecl3on is projected to op rate under PM peak hour traffic conditions as follows: • 2004 Existing E ^ 2010 Background F ^ 2010 Background + Site F ^ 2025 Background F • 2025 Background + Site` : F • At build out year 2010, State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) and Ustidk Road int reaction would require the foNowing improvements to operate at LOS E: • Add a right tum lane on eastbound approach • Add aright-tum lane on westbound approach • Add another left-tum lane on westbound approach • The proposed site Access #1 on State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) is located ap roximately 530 feet north of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) and does not meet the ITD sparing uirement per aco~s control management on State Highway 55 (Eagle Road). • If allowed, auxiliary lanes are warranted on State Highway 55 (Eag Road) • If atkrived, the proposed site atxess approach is projected too to at LOS F as a stopped-control intersection under PM peak tref5c conditions • Bakicypress Street is a partially existing road and meets the ITD akxess ntrol sparing requirement. it is located approximately'/. mile north of State Highway 55 (Eagle oad). • The opening of Baldcypress Street on State Highway 55 (Eagl Road) would require aright-tum lane on the northbound approach and restrip' the existing 2- way left tum lane for an exdusive left tum lane on the soutl~bou d approach on State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) • At build out year 2010, the approach on Baldcypress Street is prof clad to operate at LOS F as a stop~d-control intersection under PM peak tn~ffic co itions ^ The intersectlon does meet warrants for a traffic control signal b does not meet the Il'D spacing requirement for signalized intenaatlons on S Highway 55 {Eagle Road), which Is a Type IV access control faclity • The proposed site Access #1 on Us~ick Road is located approximately 350 f t east of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) and does not meet the ACRD sparing requirements for full access. • The proposed site access does meet the ACRD sparing requirem nts for aright- in-right-out acxess ^ Right tum lane at least 210 feet in length is warranted on westbou approach ^ At build out year 2010, right-tum from the proposed site acce approach is projected to operate at LOS C as astopped-control intersection Wrier PM peak traffic conditions • The developer is proposing the site Access #2 on Us~dk Road to !~ signalized at build out year. Site Acxess #2 is located approximately'/. mile east of State Highway 55 (Eagle R ) • The intersection does meet warrants far a traffic control signal ^ Right tum lane at least 210 feet in length is warranted on westboun approach ^ Left tum lane at least 100 feet in storage length is warranted on eastbound approach ^ At build out year 2010, the proposed site access intersection is prof ed to operate at LOS B as a signalized intersection under PM peak traffic ndidons _ ~ ~, .a .w<. ,. , . ~, . ~ ~K ~ ~, ~~ z ~` r ~~~. ;~~ ,t ~ ~. ,~ k ~~~ 7 11 ~~. t~ '~ ~f 4. 5. 6. 7. s 9. impacted Roads State Hiahwav 55 (Eaale Roa Frontage: 1,290-feet Functional Street Classification: Principal Arterial Traffic count: South of Ustick Road was 20,182 on 10-29-02. North of Ust;dc Road was 18,898 on 10-29-02. Level of Service: Currently better than C Speed limit: 55-MPH Ustidc Road: Frontage: 1,230-feet Functional Street Classification: Minor Arterial Traffic count: Eaesttof StateeHighway 55 (Eagle Raad) was 9,9 Ton 4-5-00. Level of Service: Currently better than C Speed limit: 45-MPH Site Information: The site currently has an existing 189,793-square foot home impro ement store and garden center. t>escription of Adjacent Surrounding Area: a. North: 35.81-acres owned by the First Church of Nazarene b. South: Ustidc Road and 34.229-acs that indude large acreages with single-f mily dwelUngs c. East: Providence Place (single-family residential neighbofiood) d. West: State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) and 41.24-acres that include large ac ages with single-family dwellings Roadway improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site Ustidc Road is cwrrently improved with 2-traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk butting the site. Ustidc Road widens to 3-lanes at the Ustldc Road /State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) in rsection. There is sidewalk to the east of this site that was constructed as a part of Providence lace Subdivision. State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) is cxJrrenthr improved with 5-traffic lanes with no curb, utter or sidewalk abutting the site. The Ustidc Road /State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) intersection is currently signalized. Existing Right-of-Way Ustidc Road currently has a total of 50 to 84-feet of right of--way (25 to 42-feet from ce terline). State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) cumentty has a total of 140-feet of right-of-way (70-f t from centerline). Existing Access to the Site The site currently has two existing driveways that acxess the public transportation sys m. There is an existing driveway that intersects Ustidc Road approximately 168-feet west of the east property line. This driveway accesses an existing single-family residental home. 4 ~F~~;, a;; ~~, ;` ~~ ;=~- ~a 10. 11. 12. B. 1. ~.~ There is an existing driveway that intersects State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) approxim north of Ustick Road. This driveway atxesses an existing mobile home. Site History The District previously reviewed this site as a part of a rezone and certificate of zoning application (MRZ-04-009 and MCZC-04-053). The flndfngs of fact and conditions of a~ report are consistent with the findings of fad and conditions of approval of the previous Capital Improvements Plan/Five Year Work Program Ustick Road is not included in the DisMct's Five Year Work Program, but is identified anti #86 in the District's Capital Improvements Plan. Ustidc Road (from Cloverdale Rc Grove Road) is anticipated to become a 5-lane roadway with curb, gutter and sidewalM period 2014 - 2018. Other Development In Area This is the last comer of the Ustidc Road / Sth#e Highway 55 (Eagle Road) intersec4lor District has reviewed. Each of the four comers are zoned commeraally (G-C). Findings for Consid®ration 600-feet ~roval of this applications. :items #85 id to Locust in the time hat the Right-oi Way and Sids~ralk District policy naauires 98-feet of right-of-way on arterial roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). is right-ot-way allows for the construction of a 5-laane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot concrete data ed sidewalks and bike lanes. District policy requires 5-foot wide (minimum) concrete sidewalk on all arterial roadwa s. This segment of Ustick Road is in the Capital Improvements Plan to be improved with traffic lanes with curb, gutter and sidewalk abutting the site. After analyzing the site, staff believes intersection will require 7 to 8-lanes at the intersection of Eagle Road and Ustick Road at the To accomrtrodate for the additional lanes at the intersection, staff recommends acquiring eright-of--way that is anticipated for 7 to 8-lanes at the intersection. From Eagle Road to 500-feet east of Eagle Road Dedicate 80-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ustidc Road (fnxn Eagle Road t 500-feet east of Emile Road) abutting the parcel by means of a warranty deed. The right-of-way pur ned by the applicant prior to scheduli leted and si n t b d d ase and sale the final plat g p e cxu mus ee agreement and for signature by the ACHD Commission or prior to issuance of a building permit (or o r required permits), whichever occurs first Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of- after receipt of all requester material. The owner will be paid the fair market value of y dedication a right-of-way dedicated which is an addition to existing ACHD right-of-way if the o~rmer submits a Is application to the impact tee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance wi r of the ACRD Ordinance in effect at that time (cwrrentiy Ordinance #198), if funds are available. The applicant should construct a 5-foot croncrete sidewalk located a minimum of 53-f t from the centerline of Ustidc Road abutting the entire site. ff the sidewalk meanders outside of a right-of- way, the applicant should provide the District with an easement for the sidewalk. 3. 50a-feet east of Eagle Road to the East Property Line Dedicate 48-feet of right-of--way from the centerline of Ustick Road {from 500-feet eas of Eagle Road to the east property line) abutting the parcel by means of a warranty deed. The right way purchase and sale agreement and deed must be completed and signed by the applicant prior to cheduling the final plat for signature by the ACRD Commission or prior to issuance of a building pe it (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material.. The owner will be paid the fair mark t value of the right-of-way dedicated which is an additlon to exisflng ACRD right-of-way if the owner ubmits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance 'th the ACHD Ordinance in effect at that time (currently Ordinancre #198), if funds are available. The applicant should construct a 5-foot concrete sidewalk Dated a minimum of 41 f t from the centerline of Ustidk Road abutting the entire site. If the sidewalk meanders outside of a right-of- way, the applicant should provide the District with an easement for the sidewalk. State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) is under the jurisdictbn of the Idaho Transportation partment. The applicant should contact the Idaho transportation Department for any requirements arding the dedication of addiflonat right-of-way and the construction of sidewalk. Access Points District policy 7204.6.14 States that direct acxess to arterials and collector is normally tricted. The developer shall try to use combined access points. H the developer can straw that the use of a combined access point to a collector or arterial street is infeasible the District may can ider direct access points based on the following guidelines: • Less than 150-fit of continuous frontage 1-access point • 150-feet to B00-fit of continuous frontage 2-access points • Greater than 600-feet of oorttinuous frontage 3-access mints Once the access points have been approved, they are to be identified as such on the nstrudion drawings. The remaining frontage along arterial and collector streets shall be identifl as having no access. The applicant is proposing to construct three acrsss ~tnts to intersect Ustlck Road. a applicant is proposing to construct one public roadway and two driveways. The number of access Ints that have been promised meet District policy and should be approved. The applicant is proposing to construct two acces.~ points to State Highway 55 (Eagle cad). State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) is under the jurisdiction of the Idaho Taansportatton Depa nt. The applicant should contact the Idaho transportation Department for any requirements reg riling access restrictions. Driveways District policy 7207.9.3 restricts commercial driveways with daily traffic volumes over 1, vehicles to a maximum width of 36-feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as cu type faclitles if located on local streets. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be uir~ for driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways. Graveled driveways abutflng public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In acxordanoa wig District policy, 7207.9.1, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site .beyond the edge of pav meat of the roadway and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway ~ e. 6 ~,'' ~. Driveways on Ustick Road District policy 72-F4 (1) requires driveways located on arterial roadways near a signal ed intersection to be located a minimum of 440-feet from the signalized intersection for afull-access d away and a minimum of 220-feet from the signalized intersection for a right iNright-out only drive y. District policy 72-F5, requires driveways located on collector or arterial roadways with speed limit of 45 to align or offset a minimum of 230-feet from any existing or proposed driveway. The applicant is proposing to construct a 26-foot wide right in right-out ONLY driveway that intersects Ustick Road approximately 392-feet east of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road). The pro sad driveway meets District policy in regard to width and location and should be approved with this pltc~tion. The applicant should construct a 6-inch raised median within Ustick Road to restrict th driveway function to right-iNright-out ONLY. The applicant should coordinate the design and in fellation of the raised median with the District Staff. The applicant is proposing to construct a 36-foot wide full acxess driveway that into Ustidc Road approximately 750 feet east of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road). The proposed riveway rrteets District policy in regard to width and location and should be approved with this applica on. Driveways on the Collector Roadway Located at the East Property Line District policy 72-F4 (1) requires driveways mated on collector roadways near a sign ized intersection to be located a minimum of 175 feet from the signalized intersection fora II-acx~ss driveway and a minimum of 85-feet from the signalized Intersection far a right iNright ut only driveway. The applicant is proposing to construct a 38-foot wide full acxess driveway that interse the proposed collector street that is located on the prop®rty's east property line. The dfire ay intersects the proposed stmt approximately 305-feet north of UsSdc Road. This driveway mee District policy and should be approved with this applicatlon. The applicant is proposing to construct 36-foot wide full amass driveway that ant the proposed collector street that is located on the property's east property line. The driveway ante the proposed street approximately 670-feet north of Ustidc Road. This driveway meets Di tract policy and should be approved with this application. Driveways on Bald Cypress Road District policy F2-F4 (1) and 72-F4 (2), r~uir~s dfireways Dated on oommerciaUind trial nradways to offset a controlled andlor uncontrolled intersection a minimum of 50-feet (measurer near edge to near edge}. The applicant is proposing to construct a 36-foot wide driveway that inten3eds Bald press Road approximately 310-feet east of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road}. This driveway meets istrict policy and should be approved with this application. The applicant is proposing to construct a 36-foot wide driveway that intersects Bald C ress Road ' approximately 300-feet west of the proposed commeraal street that is located on the s east roperty property line. This driveway meets District policy and should be approved with this ap licatlon. The applicant is proposing to construct a 36-foot wide driveway that intersects Bald C n3ss Road ' approximately 670-feet west of the proposed commerdal street that is located on the s east roperty property line. District policy F2-F4 (1) and 72-F4 (2), requires driveways located on 7 t:~ ~. ,, , ~; ~` `¢ c~mmercial/industrial roadways to offset a controlled and/or uncontrolled intersection minimum of =~ ~ 50-feet (measured near edge to near edge). ~ Driveways on State Highway 58 (Eagle Road) The applicant is proposing to construct one driveway to State Highway 55 (Eagle Roa ). State HI hwa 55 Ea le Road is under the urisdiction of the Idaho Transportation Depa j 9 Y ( 9 ant. The . applicant should contact the Idaho transportatjon Department for any requirements rag rding :Y driveway offset requirements. 4. Roadway Offsets - ModMication of Policy k ' ~~ - District policy 7204.11.6 States that the optimum spacing for collector intersections alo arterial roadways is 1,700-feet to allow adequate signal sparing. The minimum spacing that i acceptable for collector intersections akmg arterials is 1,300-feet. The applicant is proposing to construct a collector roadway that Intersects Ustiric Road approximately _ 30-feet west of the east property line. The roadway is proposed to be kx~ted approxi ately 1,200- ; ~~ feet east of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) and 675 feet west of Duane Drive. This dways location does not meet the minimum offsets established by DisMct policy for collector dways ` inten3ecting arterial roadways. Traffic Services staff have analyzed this area and de ined that a t~ ~3 ~; _ quarter mile collector is appropriate due to the fad mat a collector roadway could axle d from Ustidc Road to Fairview Avenue through the undeveloped parcels to the south of Ustiric R Based on the Traffic Services Staffs Analysis, staff is recommending a maiification of policy to Ilow the oolleri~ roadway to be constructed approximately 1,200-fee+t east of State Highway (Eagle Road), as proposed. .~ ~ ~ The applicant is proposing to construct one public roadway to intersect with State Hig y 55 (Eagle `' ~ Road). State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) is under ~e jurisdiction of the Idaho Trans lion _ ~ Department. The applicant should contact the Idaho transportation Department fora requirements ~ regarding roadway offset requirements. <` 5. Street Sections - Modlficatlon of Policy Commercial Streets District policy 7202.8 and 72-F1 B, requires roadways abutting commerrial developme is to be - ~ constructed as a 40-foot street section with curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk in 54-feet of " ~? ~:> right-ol=way. _ The applicant (in a oooperatlve effort with surrounding properties) is proposing to com late Bald x ~- ~ _ Cypress Road just north of this property. Bald Cypress Road was partially oonstruded as a part of Providence Place Subdivision. It was constructed as a 36-foot commercial roadway wi vertical curb f ' and gutter abutting approximately 75% of the site and was not completed abutting the maining 25% of the site due to the fad that the Idaho Transportation Department had not approved a acxess y point to State Highway 55 (Eagle Road). The applicant should widen the street sects at the -~ +~~ intersection of Bald Cypress Road to a 50-foot street section, as proposed, to accomm ate for three .;~ , ; traffic lanes and the applicant should complete the street section to provide a 36-toot t section to w ;_ include vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk abutting the entire site, as proposed. The ap licant will be _ ~_` ~ required to dedicate the right-of-way that is necessary to accomm~ate for three traffic anes on Bald Cypress Road. .r ,~ s~ ~° S x ~:~-~~. .,~,~,~: },a, ~' ,.~_ ,. _ : _ , r~~. .{ 7 .1 ,_ ~~, . _~ _ ;, r - ~ p i r..,-., ! .... ors +c~fr I ~ • Collector Roadways District policy 72-F1B requires collector roadways to be constructed as a 4ti-foot stre~ vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot detached (or 7-foot attached) concrete sidewalk within of-way with parking prohibited on both sides. The applicant is proposing to construct a collector roadway abutting the east property line. The applicant is proposing to construct the proposed collector roadway as a 36-foot stn3et section with vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk abutting the majority of the site with 50-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk at the intersections of Ustidc Road and ald Cypress Road. The District typically requires collector roadways to be constructed as 46-foot treat sections with vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot detached concrete sidewalk within 70-feet of right -way. The District will examine aitemative street sections for collectors if the traffic volumes and ty within the area can be accommodated by an alternative street section. Staff has examined the roposed street sections antidpated traffic volumes and beNeves that a two lane collector roadway th t provides thn3e lanes at the intersections will ~ safely and adequately carry the anticipated traffic fro this site and the surrounding area. 8. Public Roadways The dedicx~tion of public right-of-way can only occur by means of recordation of a flru+l subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed. The applicant will be required to dedicate the wired right-of- way by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty de prior to the District accepting the new collector roadway on the east property line. 7. Stub Streeffi District policy 7203.5.1 States that the street design in a proposed development shall ~ haMship to adjoining property. An adequate and ~nvenient acxess to adjoining propN future development may be required. If a street ends at the development boundary, it requirements of sub section 7205, °non-continuous streets.° District policy 7205.5 States that stub street will be required to provide infra-neighbor) or to provide access to adjoining properties. Stub streets will conform with the require described in Section 7204.5, 7204.6 and 7204.7, except a temporary col-de-sac will n~ the stub street has a length no greater than 150-feet A sign shall be installed at the tE stub street stating that, 'THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE. In add street must meet the folkfwing conditions: 1. A stub street shall be designed to slope towards the street intersection and drain s~ toward that intersection; unless a satisfactory storm drain system is install. 2. The District may require appropriate covenants guaranteeing that the stub street w of obstn~ctions. The applicant is not proposing to extend Broadleaf Street from the east property line. is proposing to construct a pedestrian pathway ONLY from Broadleaf Stmt to the pro street. The applicant's proposal is cAnsistent with the Meridian City Council action for and reione that took place on June 15, 2004. In order to preserve the opflon to open the future, the applicant is proposing to dedicate the right-of-way that is n~essary to c stub street in the future if the connection is desired to be opened at some point in the 1 supportive of the applicant's proposal to dedicate the right-of-way for a vehicular conrn use while constructing a pedestrian connection for the time being in lieu of a vehicular to the fact that a v®hicular connection to the subdivision will be obtained with the comp Cypress Road. t section with 10-feet of right- use no undue ty for use in Hall meet th® iod dreulatiion ants ~ required if Winos of the ~n, a stub Face water remain free ~ applicant ~ collector annexatlon roadway in ~truct the ~e. Staff is m for future mectfon due m of Bald 9 ~,, ~% .~; ~~ ~~ .,.~ :~:: .:: `~; ~~, r~ ,~:_ :~ .: ::: . ~ ,. n `:°- ,, s ~' :~ :, ~' ~?' ' ;: =_ _, ~ ~ = ., yY,. ' ~ ~`~„ ,y,; , Ustick Road Improvements The applicant is proposing to improve Ustick Road with vertical curb, gutter, sidewalk nd pavement widening. If the developer chooses to construct the full improvements on Ustick Road, all of the associated costs shall be at Developer's sole expense unless the applicant enters into Cooperative Development Agreement approved by the ACRD Commission. tf the applicant does choose to improve Ustick Road at the sole expense of the appli t, Ustick Road should be constructed as a 96-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter and a fit detached concrete sidewalk (or 7•foot attached concrete sidewalk) from Sthte Highwa 55 (Eagle Road) for a distance of 500 feet. The applicant should then transition to a 72 foots t section with vertical curb, gutter and a 5-foot detached concrete sidewalk (or 7-foot attached concr to sidewalk) abutting the remainder of the site on Ustick Road. If the applicant chases to meander the sidewalk on Ustick Road ou~ide of the right way, the applicant should provide the District with an easement for the sidewalk. The applicant hould also obtain a license agreement for the landscaping strip and the meandering sidewalk. Th license agreement must be approved prior to plans acceptance and issuance of a building it. The minimum requiremerrts that the applicant is required to complete include a canter lane on Ustick Road and nigh#-tum lanes at each of the site's entrances. Theme Improvements re ~uivalent to 36-feet of pavement from the centerline of Ustick Road. "see the proceeding sects n for further details 9. Turn Lanes Based on the submitted traffic impact study, the site generated traffic requires the cx}n tructlon of a center tum lane on Ustick Road. The applicant should construct the center tum lane o Ustick Road to provide a turning pocket for all three of the access points that are proposed to ante ct Ustick Road. This will require the applicant to widen Ustick Road to 3-lanes from Eagle Road to Duane Drive. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. 10. 10 Based on the submitted traffic impact study, the site generate traffic requires a rig t turn lane on Ustcck Road of at least 210 feet in length is warranted at the right in/right-out d veway that is proposed to intersect Ustick Road approximately 382-feet east of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road). Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. Based on the submitted traffic impact study, the site generate traffic requires a rig t-turn lane on Ustick Road of at least 210 feet in length is warranted at the full acxess driveway fat is proposed to intersect Ustick Road approximately 750-feet east of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road). rdinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. Signallzatlon of Ustcck Road and the Quarter Mlle The applicant is proposing to construct a public roadway at the east property line. This nadway is located at the quarter mite. The applicant has submitted an Intersection analysis shows the warrants of the signal will be met at build out of the 39-acxe site. A final intersection an lysis and District review should be completed once the applicant requests that this intersection signalized. ff the applicant proceeds to obtain a signal at the intersection of Ustick Road and then w collector roadway, the design, construction and installation of the signal will be at the sole expen a of the applicant. The applicant will also tai required to install optf-corn on the signal for emerg ncy services. If any right-of-gray is needed for the signal, the applicant will responsible for the dedica of ~e --...._ - - - - ---- ~; , I,~.~ ~., C. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 11 needed right-of-way. The applicant should enter into a development agreement with t~e District regarding the proposed signal. Site Specific Conditions of Approval Dedicate 60-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ustidc Road (from Eagle Road 500-feet east of Eagle Road) abutting the parcel by means of a warranty deed. The right-of-way pu ase and sale agreement and deed must be completed and signed by the applicant prior to sc~eduli the final plat for signature by the ACRD Commission or prior to issuance of a building permit (or of er required permit), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of- dedication after receipt of ail requested material. The owner will be paid the fair market value of a right-of-way dedicated which is an addition to existing ACHD right-of-way ff the owner submits a le er of applics~tion to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance the ACHD Ordinance in effect at that flme (currently Ordinance #198), ff funds are available. Construct a 5-foot concrete sidewalk locates a minimum of 53-feet from the centerline of Ustic~CC Road abutting the entire site. ff the sidewalk meanders outside of the right-of-way, provide D~trid with an easement for the sidewalk. Dedicate 48-feet of right-ot way from the centerline of Ustidc Road (from 500-feet east of Eagle Road to the east property line) abutting the parcel by means of a warranty deed. The right-o way purchase and sale agreement and deed must ~ completed and signed by the applicant prior th eduling the final plat for signature by the ACHD Commission or prior to issuance of a building pe it (or other required permits), whichever occurs first Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requester material. The owner will be paid the fair mark value of the right-of-way dedicated which is an addition to existing ACHD right-of-way if the owner bmits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance ith the ACHQ Ordinance in effect at that time (currently Ordinance #198), ff funds are available. Construct a 5-foot concxete sidewalk located a minimum of 41-feet from the centerline f Ustidc Road abutflng the entire site. If the sidewalk meanders outside of the right-of-way, provide a District with an easement for the sidewalk. Construct a 26-foot wide right-in right-out driveway ONLY that intersects Ustick Road a proximately 392-feet east of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road), as proposed. Construct a 6-inch ra( d median within Ustldc Road to restrict the driveways functions to right-iNright-out ONLY. Coordi ate the design and installation of the raised median with the District Staff. Construct a 36-foot wide full acxess driveway that intersects Ustldc Road approximate 750-feet east of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road), as propo.~ed. Construct a 36-foot wide full access driveway that intersects the proposed collectors t that is located on the property's east property line, as proposed. Construct a 36-foot wide full access dfi-eway that intersects the proposed collector stre t that is located on the property's east property tine, as proposed. Constnx~ a 36-foot wide driveway that intersects Bald Cypress Road approximately 31 feet east of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road), as proposed. y: }r:~_; tt;:. ~tiXq..,:..:.. `~~ - •~ ~, _~, f 3 ~r ~' y ~ ~ Y.. "- 5 y ~: ~~` <~~ ,; -. ~~ Mz 10. 11. 12. f° ~. .~ ~> ~:~ ,,~ s ~,< elf ~f `, r:1 ~,, fix; 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 1 S. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 12 Construct a 36-foot wide driveway that intersects Bald Cypress oaad approximi~l as p roperty p opertY d on the t i l oposed st of p e oca s the proposed commeraal street that Construct a 36-foot wide driveway that intersects Bald Cypress Road approximately 67 cated on the property's east property line, as P l t i t th feet west of posed. )• o a s the proposed commerdal stree Construct a collector roadway that inten3ects Ustlck Road approximately 30-feet west the east property line, as proposed. Complete the existing street section of Bald Cypress Road to provide a 3&foot street sidewalk abutting the entire site and wi t ction to en the street e inGude vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot concre section at the intersection of State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) to a 50-foot street section as proposed, to accommodate for three traffic lanes. Dedicate the necessary right-of way to a~ ode for three traffic lanes on Bald Cypress Road. Construct the proposed collector roadway as a 36 foot street sectton with v®~~ curb, sidewalk (or 7 foot attached) abutting the majority of the site; t d h utter and 5- nsitioning to a e concre e foot deNac 50-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk at the intersections of Usti Road and Bald Cypress Road. Dedicate the required right-of-way of the new cx~lector roadway by means of recordati of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to acceptance of the Public roa ys. Dedicate the right-of-way that is necessary to extend Broadleaf Street to the newly p sect collector roadway. . Construct a pedestrian pathway ONLY from Broadleaf Street to the proposed collector eet, as proposed. Construct the enter turn lane on Ustick Road to provide a turning pocket for ail thr~ points that are proposed to intersect Ustlck Road. Coordinate the design of the turn la the acxess a with District staff. Construct aright-turn lane on Ustidc Road of at least Z10 feet in length at the right-iNri t Ustidc Road approximately 392-feet east of Sta t i d ht-out Highway 55 en3ec n to driveway that is propose (Eagle Road). Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. Construct a right turn lane on Us13dc Road of at least 210 feet in length is warranted at ct Ustidc Road approximately 750-feet east of Stat t i full access Highway 55 erse n driveway that is proposed to (Eagle Road). Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. Enter into a development agreement with -the District regarding the proposed traffic sig al at the intersection of Ustkk~cc Road and the new collector roadway. Comply with requirements of ITD for State Highway 55 (Eagle Road) frontage. Submit District approval of the final plat or issuan t i t letter from of a buliding o s pr or ITD regarding the said requiremen permit (or other required pemtiits), whichever ocxurs first. Contact The Idaho Transport tion Department's District III Traffic Engineer Dan Coonce at 334-8300. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. 1i~. ~ts`C~.: }rh= jl s ~_ ~r, b,;'. ~:. - t ' Y ,~ :' ~ti' r: i ` ~ ~> ,, ~. ~, .~ ~, D. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Standard Conditions of Approval Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of--way. All utility r®location costs associated with improving stn~et frontages abutting the site sh II be hams by the developer. Repia~ any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damag during the constnwKion of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. Utilit)v stnaet cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved n writing by the District. Contact the District's Utllity Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. All design and construction shall be fn accordance with the Ada County Highway Distri Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Servicaas procedu and all applicable ACRD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registe in the Sthte of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. Construction, use and properly development shall be in conformance with all applicabl requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval far occupancy. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in a rdance with Ordinance #198, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Oniina ce. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verffy all exi i~tin~g duals ~ by the appll ~ ~ ' e appUcant applicant at no opt to ACRD shall repair existing uti ma9 shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business dam prio to breaking ground within ACRD ~gnduits sy are or filled~are hcwmpromised during arty phase of n ~~~ in the event any ACRD co ( p No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are i writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized presentathve of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain en confirmation of any change from the Ada Courriy Highway District. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the properly which is the subject of is application, shall require the applicant to comply with ail rules. r~uiations, ordinances plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in farce at the time the applicant or its successors in in erect advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject pro~rly unl a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the la in effect at the time the change in use is sought. 13 .~ i ~ E. Conclusions of Law 1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions f Approval are satisfied. Z. ACRD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/developmentwdl no place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within th vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. Appeal Guidelines ;~, 'tr. . `r::% f~~x