HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report~.
F ..:. ~: ~~:.
Y
,5~.
~~ ~,
~~t:
;. 'C:
~~,,~::
~~.,
r
~ ~ ~~ ~:;
< °:
:;
' °c~;
r
x^
:x,
f:`'
fiF:
~~F:'.
STAFF REPORT
Hearing Date: March 5, 2009
TO: Planning & Zoning Commission E IDIAN`%-'~'
FROM: Bill Parsons, Associate City Planner I _
(208) 884-5533 1 V ~,~
SUBJECT: CPA-09-002 -Linder Road Overpass Pathway FEB 2 6 ~~gg
'z CITYOFCPTE~_
1. SiT1VIlVIARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST CITY CLERKS OFFICE
The applicant, City of Meridian Planning Department, is requesting approval of a Comprehensive
Plan Text Amendment that incorporates language supporting the construction of an overpass at
Linder Road and I-84 and associated pathway. This request was initiated based on a resolution from
the Parks and Recreation Commission detailing the location, design and construction of the pathway
with the construction of the overpass. See section 6 and8 for more information.
2. SUIVIlVIARY RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of the subject CPA application, based on the Findings of Fact
listed in Ezhibit B.
3. PROPOSED MOTION
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to the
City Council of File Number CPA-09-002 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of
March 5, 2009, with the following comments: (Add any proposed comments.)
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend denial to the
City Council of File Number CPA-09-002 as presented during the hearing on March 5, 2009, for
the following reasons: (State specific reasons for denial of the subject CPA application.)
Continuance
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to continue File Number CPA-
09-002 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s):
(State specific reason(s) for a continuance.)
4. APPLICATION
a. Site Address/Location: City wide
b. Applicant/Representative:
City of Meridian Planning Department
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, Idaho 83642
c. Applicant's Statement/Justification (reference submittal material): "See applicant's narrative for
this information.
5. PROCESS FACTS
a. The subject application is for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment. A public hearing is
Linder Road Overpass Pathway CPA-09-002 PAGE 1
P, - -.
:. .. _ ~.s _
..
.
i
s . ,
X
..
c
,.
i , 4
..
~t
ih'~$
,_- a;
~.~1"
K ~ ?7d`
Y
required before the Commission and City Council on this matter, consistent with Unified
Development Code, Title 11, Chapter 5.
`F' b. Newspaper notifications published on: February 16, and March 2, 2009
'j'' x c. A public service announcement was broadcast faxed on February 6, 2009 regarding this
application.
:'.!:.t
`'"
:;{ 6. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS
F,~ #~~*~~ The City's Comprehensive Plan is a vision and policy document for guiding development and the
transportation needs in the City of Meridian. The Comprehensive Plan has identified the need for the
Ten Mile Interchange and the Locust Grove Overpass. Currently under construction, the Ten Mile
:' a: Interchange will provide additional access to I-84 however a pedestrian friendly pathway was not
designed with that project. In 2007, the Locust Grove Overpass was completed and incorporated 7-
f~:
'' `° foot attached sidewalks and a separate bike lane to help facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic. In the
r~
'`'~~ future it maybe desirable to have an additional overpass at Linder Road as identified in the Long
`'''k` Range Regional Transportation Plan. It is the intent of this text change to provide the Planning Staff
~,,_`~f~ and other local agencies of the City's preference to incorporate a segregated 10-foot multi-use
pathway as part of the design for the Linder Road Overpass.
Idaho Code 67-6508 states that "the plan shall consider previous and existing conditions, trends,
desirable goals and objectives, or desirable future situations for each planning component." Staff has
reviewed the subject CPA application and offers the analysis and recommendations contained herein
:~~ for the Commission and the City Council's consideration. Please see below and Exhibit D for detailed
~~ ti analysis of the required findings for a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment.
,.~=
y ~r ~';~ ~
Staff finds the following Goals, Objectives, and Action items contained in the 2002 Comprehensive
Plan to be applicable to this application (staff analysis is in italics below policy):
• Chapter VI, Goal II, Objective A, Action 8 (page 85) -Develop alternative modes of
transportation through pedestrian improvements, bicycle lanes, off-street pathways and transit
:^ ~~ oriented development as appropriate.
.f u- The Long Range Regional Transportation Plan has identified a future need for the Linder Road
~~ ~ 'g'1~ -: Overpass. Planning Staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission have identified the need for
a multi-use pathway to help facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic adjacent to Linder Road and
~ overt-84. The Comprehensive Plan will encourage other partnering agencies to incorporate said
' ~ pathway into the design of the future overpass.
~' • Chapter VII, Goal VI, Objective B - Provide new and alternative transportation systems to
„~ ~ ,
'
accommodate growth.
~
~:
J;.
~ =~
Staff believes the future overpass and associated multi-use pathway provides an alternative mode
Yom. of transportation that will provide future connectivity with developments north and south of the
Interstate. Further, the Long Range Transportation Plan, Communities in Motion has indicated
"''.~ the potential for 30, 000 vehicle trips per day travelling north bound by the year 2030 making it a
viable location to facilitate safe movement of pedestrian and bicycle traffic.
M~~.~ • Chapter VI, Goal II, Objective A, Action 3: Consider "Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian
y~ Travel: A Recommended Approach" from the National Center for Bicycling and Walking in all
} land-use decisions.
~~ ~. ' .
,.
Linder Road Overpass Pathway CPA-09-002 PAGE 2
,~
";~,
t ..
1
~~~
[L ~i
°~~~~-
';
~;r
T"'
e
'~tF 9FF a,:•
-r~;
`;
~, ~r
.,, u
~~> ~ ~a
''=,~°:
':~t i'>~
~'
ry y:
~ ~
.~.H:
~;
a, as
~. ;;
_., ~~.
~ ~ f';r
a ~ ~~
~:. ,:
.r
~~
z;~~.
='~~~:~
~,
>', ' ~:;
,;~
t'
,,~
~..
L ~ 7'
f '
¢z .
arr
Y,;L
~ ~~
e~; ,
ti•..;_
This publication encourages jurisdictions to establish bikeway and walkway facilities in new
construction and reconstruction projects, in a manner that is safe, accessible and convenient.
Staff believes that the subject applications generally comply with the applicable policies listed in
the literature noted above.
Based on the analysis above, staff believes the proposed text change is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that the Commission rely on facts presented in the staff
report and any verbal or written testimony that may be provided at the public hearing when
determining if the CPA request is appropriate.
7. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
The Comprehensive Plan is to serve as a guide for future development within Meridian. As
development is proposed for this area (Linder Road and I-84), staff will ensure compliance with the
UDC and Meridian Master Pathway Plan.
8. ANALYSIS
a. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT: The subject CPA text amendment is proposing to
integrate text for a future Linder Road Overpass and associated pathway into the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Department initiated the CPA text amendment at the request of
the Parks & Recreation Commission.
The proposed changes will provide clarity to City and partner agencies when the Linder Road
Overpass is designed regarding the City's preferences for incorporation of pedestrian facilities per the
Meridian Pathways Master Plan. The proposed language (1) reaffirms Linder Road as an on-street
route north and south of I-84 per the adopted Pathways Master Plan, (2) asserts an expectation that
the accommodations for the pathway across the bridge be physically separate from vehicle travel
lanes, and (3) recommends a side of Linder Road for the future on-street pathway.
This request integrates the Parks & Recreation Commission's recommendation into the City's
Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, staff is recommending the following text revision to the
Comprehensive Plan as follows:
Pg. 71-After last bullet (Eagle Road), add the following:
Consistent with the Regional Long Range Transportation Plan. the City of Meridian supports
the construction of an overpass at the intersection of Linder Road and Interstate 84. When
constructed, this overpass should include an on-street pathway route along the west side of the
roadway as it is mostly undeveloped and allows an opportunity for continuation of the on-street
route north and south of the interstate through future development. The on-street route should
be separated from vehicle travel lanes with a iersey barrier or other appropriate means to
substitute for the typical 6-8 foot plantins buffer. Aside from the plannine buffer, this route
should be constructed to the specifications in the City's Master Pathway Plan.
Pg. 85 -Goal II, Objective A, Action 10:
"Identify a City liaison to:
- Encourage and promote the development of an overpass at the Intersection of
Lec~ast-G~eve Linder Road and I-84 by ACRD. The overpass should accommodate
pedestrians as described on pale 71.
Linder Road Overpass Pathway CPA-09-002
. , ~ .:?
PAGE3
~~
;~
}- .:
~~:.
r.
f,~;..; -
_ .,
.;
A. Other Agency and Department Comments
On February 12, 2009, a joint agency and department meeting was held with service providers in this
area. The agencies and departments present include: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian Parks and
Department. None of the agencies or departments listed above provided comments at the January 29th
meeting.
1. FIIiE DEPARTMENT
1.1 The Fire Department has no concerns related to this application.
2. POLICE DEPARTMENT
2.1 The Police Department has no concerns related to this application.
3. PARKS DEPARTMENT
3.1 The Parks Department has no concerns related to this application.
Exhibit A - 1 -
~,
'..'
<:.
~ ;
B. Required Findings from the Unified Development Code
1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Findings
Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation
and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan, the Council shall make the following findings:
a. The proposed amendment is consistent with the other elements of the Comprehensive
Plan.
Staff finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the other elements of the
Comprehensive plan (See Section 6 above).
b. The proposed amendment provides an improved guide to future growth and
development of the city.
Staff fords that the proposed amendment provides an improved guide to future growth and
development of the city.
c. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the Goals, Objectives and
Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff fords that the proposed amendment is internally consistent with the Goals, Objectives,
and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan (See Section 6 above).
d. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Unified Development Code.
Staff fords that the proposed amendment is not inconsistent with the Unified Development
Code. Staff will ensure full compliance with the UDC and the Design Manual with future
development proposals.
e. The amendment will be compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses.
Staff finds that the proposed amendment will be compatible with existing and planned land
uses for the area.
f. The proposed amendment will not burden existing and planned service capabilities.
Staff fords that the proposed amendment would not burden existing and planned service
capabilities in this area of the city.
g. The proposed map amendment (as applicable) provides a logical juxtaposition of uses
that allows sufficient area to mitigate any anticipated impact associated with the
development of the area.
NA
h. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the City of Meridian.
Staff finds that the proposed amendment is in the best interest of the City.
~~~ ::
Exhibit B
-1-
~~~•