Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-01-15 JointE • (:MN-EP,IDIAN*,q_--, IDAHO CITY couNciL i MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPECIAL JOINT MEETING / WORKSHOP AGENDA Meridian Police Department 1401 East Watertower, Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, January 15, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. City of Meridian: --,& David Zaremba Joe Borton Y,_ Charlie Rountree �Keith Bird _X Mayor Tammy de Weerd Meridian Development Corportation: X Craig Slocum - Chairman _� Keith Bird Scott Turlington - Vice -Chairman C Clarence Jones 0 Larry Lipschultz — Secretary _� Kirk Moms Tammy de Weerd [tem Agenda Item Presenter Action Needed Tim 1 ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE City Clerk - 2 ADOPTION OF AGENDA City Council Approve - 3 COMMUNITY ITEMS / PRESENTATIONS: Petra Inc. - (a) Update on New City Hall Gene Bennett, Progress Update 10 Building Construction Jon Anderson & min Adam Johnson (b) Downtown Development Discussion 60 What's on Downtown Shaun Wardle min Old Town District & Anna Canning Current Zoning Infrastructure Len Grady Issues — Next Steps Meridian City Council/ MDC Joint Special Meeting /Workshop Agenda -January 15, 2008 Page 1 of 2 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 0 Meridian City Council / MDC Joint Special Meeting / Workshop Agenda -January 15, 2008 Page 2 of 2 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 4 CITY POLICY REVIEW: (a) x x x 5 CITY ORDINANCE REVIEW: (a) x x x Meridian City Council / MDC Joint Special Meeting / Workshop Agenda -January 15, 2008 Page 2 of 2 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. NOTICE OF SPECIAL JOINT MEETING / WORKSHOP Mayor Tammy de Weerd City Council Members: Keith Bird Joe Borton Charles Rountree David Zaremba MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL / MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian and the Meridian Development Corporation will hold a Special Meeting / Workshop at the Meridian Police Department, 1401 East Watertower, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, January 15th, 2008 at 6:00 pm. The Meridian City Council and Meridian Development Corporation will be discussion the following agenda items: Update on New City Hall Building Construction Downtown Development What's on Downtown Old Town District & Current Zoning Infrastructure Issues Next Steps The public is welcome to attend. DATED this 11th day of January, 2098. Fro WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - CITY CLERK 0 Meridian City Council Special Joint Workshop / Meeting — January 15, All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or heahf 4 please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public mee��iri`� fl -)i + Tor PLAf-d b WO(W Tha-af- V i Mayor Tammy de Weerd City Council Members: E IDIA,. Keith bird i's' Joe Borton Charles Rountree IDAHO David Zaremba NOTICE OF SPECIAL JOINT MEETING I WORKSHOP MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL I MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian and the Meridian Development Corporation will hold a Special Meeting / Workshop at the Meridian Police Department, 1401 East Watertower, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, January 15th, 2008 at 6:00 pm. The Meridian City Council and Meridian Development Corporation will be discussion the following agenda items: Update on New City Hall Building Construction Downtown Development What's on Downtown Old Town District & Current Zoning Infrastructure Issues - Next Steps The public is welcome to attend.Cf DATED this 11th day of January, 2098. FSO rs WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - CITY CLERK -�� Meridian City Council Special Joint Workshop / Meeting — January 15, All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of 1% ,A Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or heap P r 1 11911`°``��R please contact the City Clerks Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public mee�14�. • Meridian City Council Special Workshop Meeting January 15, 2008 A meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, January 15, 2008, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Tammy de Weerd, David Zaremba, Keith Bird, Charlie Rountree, and Joe Borton. Others Present: Ted Baird, Will Berg, Anna Canning, Len Grady, Jeff Lavey, Steve Siddoway, Elroy Huff, Stacy Kilchenmann, Pete Friedman and Dean Willis. MDC Board Members Present: Craig Slocum, Scott Turlington, Kirk Moms, Clarence Jones, Ryan Armbruster, and Shaun Wardle. Item 1: Roll -call Attendance: Roll call. X David Zaremba X Joe Borton X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird X Mayor Tammy de Weerd De Weerd: I'll go ahead and call this meeting to order. We will start with roll call attendance. Item 2: Adoption of the Agenda: De Weerd: Thank you. Our first -- Item 1 is adoption of the agenda. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: I move we adopt the agenda as published. Bird: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as presented. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carries: MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 3: COMMUNITY ITEMS / PRESENTATIONS: Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 2 of 30 (a) Update on New City Hall Building Construction - Petra Inc. - Gene Bennett, Jon Anderson & Adam Johnson — Progress Update. De Weerd: Item 3. We do have an outline and we will start with an update on the City Hall project building. We had our talking event today. Shaun, you were there; correct? No? Wardle: I was inside the -- De Weerd: You were in the building. Wardle: I was in the vicinity. De Weerd: It was very nice and I would certainly like to thank Will and Shelly, my office staff, for putting that all together. So, Gene, I'll tum this over to you. Bennett: Thank you. I have passed out our monthly report and I will briefly go through it. Joining me today is Jon Anderson, superintendent, and I will have Jon go through the schedule. And, then, in addition, if you have any questions, Adam Johnson is here as well. I will briefly take you through the book and, then, I'll let Jon expand on the schedule itself. As far as the schedule is concerned, the project is on schedule on the south half of the building. We are a little bit behind on the north half, since we have gone through some pretty bad weather here in the last three weeks. The south half of the building is in the dry. For those that have walked through the building you see the -- the rough -ins going in. The north half of the building is partially enclosed and partially roughed in. Section three deals with Leeds. Right now we are targeted for 34 points of a range of 33 to 38 for silver. So, that's still the goal for the building is a Leeds accredited silver building. There is a meeting coming up next week to review those in detail, again, with the mechanical -electrical engineers and the architect. On the financial side of the project, currently the plaza has been partially redesigned. That bid package will go out here at the end of January, will bid in February. That package is targeted at 1.7 to 2.2 million dollars, bringing your total building budget to 19.9 to 20.4 million dollars. Currently the project is 46 percent build to date. ASIs, there are, actually, a total of 60 in place at this point. The total of those 60 ASIs have resulted in a 27 day schedule requested additional time and we are reviewing that. We have not approved it at this point. RFIs, 74 to date, who are active. Submittals on your materials, 167 to date, 14 are yet to be approved, the other 153 are approved. To go through the schedule in a little bit of detail, I'll let Jon take it from there. The schedule is tab number two in your booklet. The first sheet is the detailed mechanical -electrical sheet. Your overall schedule is on the second page. And, Jon, I'll let you take it from there. Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 3 of 30 Anderson: The first sheet, which is the schedule with the trades, to date, as we drop down, the first floor rough in is complete and we have drops with our weather. We have enclosed the south half of the building. We are moving item 36, which will reflect on the next schedule for next month. The second floor rough in is going in and it's almost complete. Third floor rough in, item 38, will actually move in third place as we go through this flooring activity and that is the actual putting the floor down, the computer floor. So, we are actually moving the north half of the building behind the south half of the building, because we have control at this point in time in the south half with our weather. So, enclose the north half and get our roof on, the steel buttoned up, so we can install the rest of the roof. The north half of the building will lag a couple weeks behind this schedule. It's been kind of hard to follow, but when we get through the flooring activity, which is the middle to the end of February, on the second sheet, which is how it ties together -- on the next sheet back, which is our master schedule, the CPM schedule, when you go down to the access flooring, which is item number 29 on the second sheet, that access flooring we anticipate wrapping up by the end of February on the north half of the building. The next item down, partition walls, is actually being pulled ahead, partition walls on the first floor, south half of the building, will start next week. We will follow into third floor, so on and so forth. So, where we do have control we are dragging those activities ahead to maintain the schedule with anticipation of finishing as early as we possibly can, Mayor. Critical path on the main facility at this point, again, it's getting the floor down, getting the partition walls framed, which is the bulk of the walls inside the building. Walls roughed in, drywall, and, then, finishing up the drywall activities about the middle of May. The paint following that. The mill work and so on and so forth. So, we are still in a little bit limbo, but I'm still pushing as hard as I can here to obtain this access flooring and finishing up at the end of February, which allows us the ability to take off the petition walls. So, what I'm saying, the access floor finishing, that will be third floor north section. So, as we build the south end, the first floor, second floor, third floor, we will have to drop back and, then, completing the first floor north, second floor north, and third floor north as it was originally scheduled. So, I have had to move things around based what we actually have control of the weather and the building. Other activities on site, our utilities are all to the building. We have water, power, gas. The phone is a matter a couple conduits getting to the building. Our main switch gear is inside and we are in the process of piping it. So, we should have permanent power within the next six to eight weeks when we will actually have permanent power. From there the brick itself has started on the south elevation. By the end of next week it should be topped out on the south half of the building and they are starting set that there on that north elevation. So, once the brick goes up on the top and the north, we can connect the two together in the center, because the south and north portions are brick and the center section is mainly your stone, 0 Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 4 of 30 with your accent on brick. So, we are, actually, moving that around. So, anyway, again, schedule -wise, the access flooring is driving where we are at and petition walls are moving ahead, wall rough -ins are moving ahead, with anticipated date of, again, the end of February for access flooring to wrap up, so -- the plaza will bid. As soon as the plaza comes back we will start the plaza activity the first of March, the middle of March, and the masons should be out of the way so we can start the whole plaza activity, so we do have an entrance into the building when it opens. That's where we are at. De Weerd: Council, any questions for either Gene or Jon? Any questions from our MDC Board? Jones: Looking great. De Weerd: I did ask Will to samples, if you would like to elevation to add the colored Banding. Rountree: The Mayor's stripes. -- we do have a new elevation and the interior see that. They did change some of the front stripes, accents, whatever the terminology is. De Weerd: You have to tell everything. And, then, this is the color pallet, the interior colors on the floors, the wall colors, bathrooms, wallpaper, et cetera. Jones: Very nice. De Weerd: Thank you. Slocum: Since we didn't have the luxury of the report, I'll ask the 64,000 dollar question. So, when are we intending occupancy? Bird: October 1 st -- August 1 st we will start moving in. Right, Jon? Anderson: That is the target date. And we strive for that target date every day. Berg: We are not going to move in until it's ready to be moved into, but -- Anderson: At the very end of the project it's important to remember that we do have a flush -out period and that is built into the schedule as well. We are allowed to do some minor punch list activities and that will be when the punch list activities are wrapped up. But as far as after construction, we have to be complete and we tum on the air handlers and actually flush the building out. Once we flush for the volume of air that's required per square foot, at that point in 0 • Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 5 of 30 time -- and through the process we are changing the filters on the air handlers to insure the quality of the air for capturing the particulates. With the change of filters we have to flush the volume of air being flushed and we actually set up monitoring inside the building to check for BI -Ts and check for particulates and we check for different things in the air to insure the air quality. This is a major part of the Leed process. So, that aspect, which is at the very end of the job, will encroach into some of the activities as far as punch list, putting signs up, but all the mill work, all the facias, have to be intact before we start the flush. And that insures, again, the quality of the building. Bird: We have got the month of July set aside for that, don't we? Anderson: No comment. De Weerd: See, it's not just the Mayor. Anderson: It will be a little warm in there. But we are taking every avenue we can and that's why I've had to, on the south, get back where we can have control, and once we have it enclosed, then, we can spread back out. All the trades that we have on site right now have more forces than they are willing to dedicate to them to it until we can get them back in on the site, so -- De Weerd: You know, certainly, the site has proved to be a challenge with the contamination that we have found and some other surprises as well. We had some issues with our still and now weather. But they have been making up time where they can and so I know they will make a good faith effort to meet Mr. Bird's and my time frame, but we will -- Bird: They will meet it. De Weerd: We will be reasonable, too. Any questions? Berg: Madam Mayor, not to say we haven't thought about it, but we have talked about scheduling with Jon's expertise about what departments do we move in first in the building and how we want to arrange that move in, because we are not all going to move in at once, so we need to take care of the first floor, so things are contained and people coming in, they don't be wondering all over. So, we have talked about how seeing other ones, like at the courthouse and a few others, how we can maybe move in and structure that move in, so we are not walking over each other. We have kind of looked at that and so -- Bird: It will be nice. 0 0 Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 6 of 30 De Weerd: We also just saw a redesign of the plaza, our final redesign. One of the things that wasn't taken into consideration was the cross -access for Buich's piece and so we needed a drive aisle from the alley to Broadway, so -- but the plaza looks really nice and certainly none of the -- the intended goals with the water features, with the historic panels, and the amphitheater and those kind of things, have not been compromised at all. So, it's -- it's still going to be a huge asset in terms of giving a place for people to come and gather. Jones: Wonderful. De Weerd: We appreciate you being here to give this report. And that was a great tour. We got to tour the building. If you had braved the cold you could have, too. Bennett: Thank you. (b) Downtown Development - Shaun Wardle — Len Grady What's on Downtown Old Town District & Current Zoning Infrastructure Issues Next Steps De Weerd: Thanks Will. The next item is our discussion about downtown development. We will start with Mr. Wardle. Mr. Wardle. He's first up. Canning: Mr. Wardle had indicated that he wanted me to go first, so that he could fill in after me. De Weerd: Okay. Wardle: Before we do that, Madam Mayor, for those of you that may not know our two new board members, Kirk Morris, Scott Turlington, are our newest board members. Certainly you know Clarence and Craig, and I believe this is the first formal meeting that our former board member has been at, so he's received his certificate of appreciation and we'd like to thank him again. Sorry, Anna. Canning: I just want to give you -- we do have a couple of new members and I thought I'd give a brief history of the planning department crossing boundaries with MDC here about last five years. I promise it will be brief, so -- so, about -- sometime around the beginning of -- or the middle 2002 the city adopted a Comprehensive Plan that had an Old Town designation on it. And, then, in about the beginning of 2003 just before my tenure -- so, the dates really an issue, but Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 7 of 30 around the beginning of 2003 the planning department initiated a rezone of all the properties within the Old Town designation to zone them OT at that time. So, we have a Comprehensive Plan designation, as well as a zoning district with the name Old Town. That -- at that initial hearing, with all those owners, they were not encouraging of that rezone, because everything was a conditional use at that time in Old Town, pretty much any use you wanted to do. An ice cream store required conditional use approval, which at the time came out six months -- four to six months. So, the planning department pulled back on that. At this point the MDC was in its mere infancy at that point -- no pun. It was truly a baby. But, then, we worked on the zoning code for the Old Town district and there are a lot of principally permitted uses now. So, that means you can go into the planning department within a matter of -- of a week to two weeks you can get a building permit for -- you can get down to the building permit and accomplish that goal. So, we have one of the tools in place that we need to move forward with -- for Old Town zoning. So, there is a key component missing and that's design guidelines for all of the downtown. As you know, we did work on design guidelines, but right now they are for the historic core and that historic core is shown on the map before you and I will go into more detail on this map for a moment. But I wanted to talk about those design guidelines. So, we have them for that historic core, but we don't have them for the old areas of downtown. But we are working on them and we have our first steering committee meeting on the design guidelines this week -- tomorrow. I think it's tomorrow. Tomorrow. So, that's an exciting move forward on our part and we hope to have those completely done by the end of the year and we can move forward and decide what's appropriate -- if it's the appropriate time to rezone Old Town at that point, after talking with MDC and Council on this matter. So, we are moving very much closer to where we need to be with regard to all those tools in place. Okay. So, having said that, that's the very brief history of Old Town. What you have before you is a map that shows the Old Town Comp Plan designation boundaries or anything that's colored. So, if it's colored it's listed in the Old Town Comprehensive Plan map. And, then, you see there is a number of zoning categories that range from the Old Town zoning, which is the darker brown and the lighter historic core brown. And, then, you have C -C, which is kind of a -- our mid level commercial district, is the pink one. The red is our heaviest commercial district. The most -- allows the most intense use of the property. The purple is our limited office district, which is limited to offices. It's A little self-explanatory. and, then, we have an industrial district in gray. You have medium -- low, medium, and medium high residential. So, you have got all different -- three different residential categories within there as well. Each of those districts has a different maximum height limit and those are provided next to that zoning description. You will see the max height and, then, the number of stories that that generally accommodates. So, it's an estimate there. So, we have a variety of things going on there. One that -- of particular note is within that special Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 8 of 30 district, that downtown historic heart, the zoning code would allow five to six stories, but the design guidelines for that area talk about two to three. Because we knew that the Old Town zoning district would eventually accommodate more than just that historic height -- or historic heart. So, we have a higher height limit. I think there may be a difference in vision between the City Council and the MDC with regard to particularly that block between Main and Meridian and limiting that to three story. And, then, the only other two things that I wanted to go over tonight were to remind you of our in lieu fee arrangement that we have and I think will work really well. Shaun and I came up with a good solution to that that works efficiently and is easy for folks to understand. And, then, we are also working together on the 3rd Street extension to punch through, the location to make it work. And with that I can answer questions or maybe you want to wait until Shaun fills in all my blanks and, then, you can ask questions. De Weerd: Any questions at this point? Shaun. Wardle: Thanks, Anna. Anna pointed out some challenges that we can talk about in just a minute, but one of the things that I wanted to let the Council know, the Meridian Development Corporation is engaged in a 3-D modeling venture and we kick that off tomorrow morning at 11:00 o'clock with our consultant Visual Genesis. What we will be doing is modeling the urban renewal area in a 3-D fashion, base mapping the ground, so that we can -- we can map up what we think and what we feel downtown will become and one of the things that Anna and I have talked about is the ability for her new staff member that will be doing all of the design guidelines -- is that correct, Anna? To have the ability to take some ideas and paste -- essentially, paste them on buildings to see how they mesh with each other. So, we see that going further, in addition to some of the other things that we have. We are also working on, as Anna mentioned, the 3rd Street corridor. What we are looking for is, really, an alignment from Franklin to Fairview and our continuing down that path with our consultant. The other item of interest is our favorite transportation improvement, the split corridor. Phase one we are working diligently with the planning department and the parks department on our landscaping of the phase one portion of that. In addition to that, tomorrow at 1:00 o'clock ACHD has the phase two kick-off meeting. So, that brings us kind of up to speed on where we are at in terms of partnership with the city. One of the issues that has come up within discussions of the City Council and the urban renewal agency is in our renewal plan we have a number of initiatives to -- that we focus on. One of the major initiatives is infrastructure and so from an infrastructure standpoint, I'm going to talk briefly and, then, I'm going to tum it over to Len, who is going to talk about Public Works sewer and water. To let the Council know, as I expressed at their last meeting, the urban renewal agency's focus has been on property acquisition, particularly when it comes to parking. And so given the limited funds that we have from the Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 9 of 30 increment, we have not only used those funds, but gone into -- into debt to secure additional properties, and so at this current time the renewal agency's plan has been to find and to facilitate parking as its number one priority. And that leaves us, in terms of funding, a little short on some of the projects that we were thinking about in terms of Public Works. But Len actually has some better news for us. So, Len, if you want to just -- I'll tum it over to you and you can talk about that and, then, we can come back and take any questions that you may have for me. Okay? De Weerd: Council and MDC Board, before we tum this over to Len, we, as our senior management team, saw maybe a possible collision starting to happen in terms of what infrastructure is available here downtown and how are we going to pay for whatever improvements we are going to be needing and we wanted to make sure we had a good consensus that what the city understood is actually the vision that MDC has and that would help us determine a base line for what the service needs are. We did have a discussion last month with City Council members to -- to take a look at some of the questions that were raised by our senior management team and each of the areas, anywhere from fire, building, infrastructure, design, to really get a good base -- Canning: Alleys. De Weerd: And alleys. I was getting to alleys. That's the funnest. So, I guess some of the clarity we were looking for before we came and had this discussion with the MDC Board, is do we want alleys or not. What we did walk away from is if someone wants to eliminate the alleys, then, they can divert the line -- the sewer line to service that. Because right now our service lines for sewer and water run down the alleyways and that's something that the direction has been if that is the preferred option, that would be put upon the development to take care of and that was a key determination for us in figuring some of this stuff out. So, just kind of with that base line, each of our senior management team is here to respond to any questions you have and that will happen under the issue section. But I did want to let you know that we wanted to make sure that we had all the questions up front, so as we proceed in partnership in your redevelopment efforts, we have clear communication lines, we know the obstacles along the way, so those can be communicated to any potential investors. So, all of this is known up front. Len. Grady: With that Council asked me to look at a couple of scenarios at our last meeting to determine, you know, if we have to go in and do some reclaiming of some of the sewer pipes and upgrade them, what's it going to cost. So, I set out to do that. However, at the same time we were also in the process of updating our sewer model. We have a fairly sophisticated global sewer model, but, Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 10 of 30 unfortunately, downtown it sort of lacks some of the detail. So, we went out and hired civil surveyors to survey in those manholes and shore up that -- that sewer model and, basically, the results were very encouraging. Where we thought we might have significant problems downtown, we actually have a fair amount of capacity, so it's really good news. I won't bore you with the details, I know you're all really excited about sewer, but figure one is really sort of the tell tail of where we are at with that. On each of -- each of those areas -- unfortunately, the shading between area two and three is a little close there. But we have a fair amount of hook-ups downtown with the existing sewer -- sewer lines in there. We have done some upgrading recently. That's the good news. The bad news is downstream of downtown, in conjunction with all of the rest of what's going on in Meridian, we start getting a bottleneck downtown -- or, song, downstream of downtown. So, when you take a look at these numbers you may think, well, yeah, we can go and just add all of those connections. Unfortunately, that's not the case. If we stopped hook-ups right now, you could do this and we would have capacity, but as we have Pinebridge and others hook up, we begin -- and those start collecting into trunks downstream, we start having a sewer capacity problem. So, with our having focused downtown, we now realize that we need to start focusing our efforts downstream, so the next time we meet we will have better information there on what we really can allow downtown. But back to the original question Council asked me is, you know, should we be charging more downtown or less or what have you. Well, given we have probably plenty of capacity for at least quite some time, that question wasn't quite as important. But I thought you might be interested in if we did decide to -- for example, spur growth downtown and reduce the hook-up cost say by 50 percent, the rest of the city would probably only have to increase their cost five percent to cover that. So, it's -- you know, because downtown is a fairly small area, although very dense, the rest of the city, it basically gets lost in the noise. So, those numbers are just -- just for your -- just to spark interest, I guess. And I'm not necessarily proposing or anything that we reduce hook-up fees downtown. So, with that are there any questions? De Weerd: Questions? Council, any questions? Bird: I have none, Mayor. Rountree: I may have after I have had an opportunity read it, but I don't have any right now. De Weerd: Well, I think -- Slocum: Did -- having civil surveys and still do the work, they look at capacity, did they look at condition? 0 • Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 11 of 30 Grady: Yes. We have some condition problems, In fact, we are in the process of -- we are on a three year cycle to go and camera all the lines and, unfortunately, a lot of that downtown is either in progress of being cameraed or will be cameraed within the next, you know, couple of months. We believe we have some infiltration downtown and there may be an opportunity after we get that information to go in and fix that. Save treatment costs down the road, so -- Slocum: Thank you. De Weerd: Len, you might explain the next step. Grady: Well, we are going to — we are going to continue to work on the model. We update the model yearly, like I said, more on a global basis. We are in that process now of updating that model and will get -- we will get much more detail downtown and all of the areas surrounding downtown and be able to give you better answers on how much we can and can't allow, without going in and doing major upgrades. De Weerd: But the next step as well is looking at the downstream and how we can divert some of these other regions to different lines. Grady: Yeah. De Weerd: Stacy, do you want to say anything about financial modeling or -- Kilchenmann: Well, I -- the city is currently -- basically spent our -- the fund that they built up through the period of growth in order finance the right of way and wastewater expansion, so we kind of at a -- at a zero point right now. So, that was one of our big concerns, I guess, and why we really needed to discuss this and figure out what we are going to do. And I listed some various ways that the city could generate money externally, not just through growth, which most of those are bonding, if the city does any kind of debt we need take on, we pretty much have to do through a public vote. So, we are looking at -- that's why we kind of said to have this discussion about the Greenfield thing and so forth and trying to narrow this down and get some numbers put to it, so we can discuss ways if we need to change our fees. You know, if we do take on debt, we would need to -- we have to show that we can recover that through our operating expenses and that takes quite a bit of planning. So, I think that's kind of a real immediate focus for us to try to put some hard numbers and do some planning. De Weerd: Okay. 0 Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 12 of 30 Kilchenmann: And we will tender them to MDC staff, depending on how much money we have, but we are not -- De Weerd: There is no ask here. If you're wondering when the other shoe is dropped. I know Ron isn't here. Jeff, did you have anything you wanted to bring up? Lavey: No. I think it's all been addressed. We just talked about -- you know our feeling about alleys and that's the only issue, so -- De Weerd: Sorry. I asked. Slocum: Is it worth sharing with MDC? Lavey: We can share it. Slocum: I didn't mean to open a can of worms. Lavey: You know, it's one of those things that -- it's one of those things as far as -- there is an issue as far as you're running sewer lines into the alleyways or into the street and we always run them in the alleyways and part of what we do in planning and our recommendations is to design -- or at least offer opinions based upon crime prevention and alleys attract crime and so one of the biggest things that we can do to prevent crime is to eliminate alleys. Well, you have to balance that on a needs of is that -- is that practical and that's -- we just address that each and every time, so -- and, then, also not just crime, but as far as traffic flows and that sort of thing and do you have people trying to cut through the alleys, creating risk, or do you have those parked in the street and those are subjected to off loading. So, those are all questions you have to ask each and every time and just find where that balance is. So, I think that about a 30 second nutshell. De Weerd: Now, you see the debate that goes on at our meetings. Lavey: We compromise and -- Wardle: And if I can -- I guess maybe the -- our board of commissioners haven't heard the alley sort of discussion we've had. The real discussion came as I meet with the developers and they talk about consolidation of properties in the downtown core, one of the things that they strive to do is maximize their site and because the sewer is currently in the alleys, they have been asking are there ways to remove the sewer so that we can maximize that site. Can alleys be vacated because they are not being utilized for their transportation purposes and so one of the things that Public Works said is I mean you can do anything, it just 0 Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 13 of 30 costs money to move -- to move those sorts of things and so the planning perspective is there are purposes for alleys that give opportunities for -- I'll let Anna expand on that in terms of it gives an opportunity not only for transportation, but for interesting places and so that's kind of where this alley -- I won't call it a debate, but this alley issue came up between MDC and the city and all the other agencies. Lavey: Madam Mayor, I want to -- De Weerd: It probably is a debate. Lavey: If this is going to be on the record I shouldn't say this, but one of the things that we will -- we look at this way, though, is that you have an issue of having buildings to where there is only a small separation, instead of the alleys, say three feet or four feet or whatever. That's worse. And, then, when you actually have buildings that adjoin each other -- and I think the fire department is going to sit there and say that's even worse. And so we recognize the fact that the alleys give the fire separation. The alleys do give some sort of access to travel and it's not a confined space that creates an even greater danger without lights and issues and everything else. And so we state for the record what our feelings are on alleys, but we recognize that we found a balance that's probably slightly beneficial. Slocum: That's on the record. De Weerd: That is on the record. Lavey: We don't say that quite as much as -- we need certain people to -- right, Anna? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: I would only comment that to build City Hall we asked to vacate an alley and I can certainly see developers wanting to build across that space. Lavey: But we also moved the sewer. Bird: And we also moved the sewer. Berg: And utilities. Bird: And utilities and we paid for it. Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 14 of 30 De Weerd: Anything else regarding alleys? Craig, did you have something? Yes, David. Zaremba: If we are sort of done with that subject, I have another infrastructure and finance comment to pass onto everybody. At a meeting of ACHD's Capital Investment Citizens Advisory Committee, which -- which I attend, the CICAC was apprised of the fact that the city of Boise at some point is going to go to the legislature and ask that all urban renewal districts in the state be exempted from impact fees for the purpose of providing an incentive to anybody that would develop there and, you know, to make in -fill and renewal projects easier, that's Boise take on it. ACHD has the opinion that that doesn't really have legs, that it's not going to go anywhere. I would lean towards ACHD's opinion, because it means that in an urban renewal district ACHD would have, essentially, no funding. So, I just wanted to put that on everybody's radar, that that is a possible thing that the city of Boise may be proposing. I'm not in favor of it in person, but I just wanted people to be thinking about it. De Weerd: And it does have major concerns as they face two portions of the downtown transportation plan is impact fee eligible. So, if you stopped paying impact fees downtown, that money has to come from somewhere, so -- Turlington: What is the ACHD's current impact fee for commercial per square foot? Zaremba: Based on square footage and it's different for retail and uses, it's very use based and very flexible. Turlington: The high end I have heard could be eight bucks. Is that right or -- Bird: How much? Turlington: Eight. Is it that high? Slocum: Drive-thru, seems like 12,000 per thousand square foot. Zaremba: It is published and it could be gotten, but it's -- it's a very big chart. Wardle: David, if I might ask just a question. One of the issues that dealt with just recently in one of our new businesses downtown is a reuse and a subsequent fee paid for that. Is that something the committee -- I can understand their -- their resistance to an outright impact fee being deleted for urban renewal areas, but have they looked at the reuse of -- of existing buildings? We had a situation on Idaho Street where an existing building was Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 15 of 30 adaptively reused, kept in an historic nature, and upgraded, in our opinion, and fees were significant for that use. Has that been talked about, do you know? Zaremba: CICAC has not talked about -- whether ACHD staff has had discussions I don't know. But I'm -- I'm certain they would have discussions if it was brought up to them. Wardle: And one of the things that Anna and I have -- have worked together to -- to base our in lieu of fee is there really is an incentive to save the historic nature of buildings, to get credit for that square footage and don't, essentially, have to pay the in lieu of fee if they keep or reuse that space. So, we are doing some at the local level. There is -- Zaremba: I can see the sense to that. De Weerd: And that's different from, I think, the intent of this other one. This is scraping and constructing new. I guess one of the things that staff has also been tasked with is looking at those buildings that are trying to be restored and looking at our building codes to see how they will apply in Old Town and so trying to make it so it's not so cumbersome, seeing where there is flexibility in the code, in particular to remodeling, to make it reasonable and not so cost prohibitive. So, they are evaluating that as well. Steve. Siddoway: I think the issue for downtown development for the parks department is primarily the downtown streetscape. Right now the parks department is in charge of maintaining the existing tree wells and irrigation, cleaning up the banners that you see down there. And as the downtown redevelops -- and I know MDC has been working on new streetscape standards and that grows to the extent that downtown will be adding additional maintenance and more banners, adding flower pots, more hardscape, more irrigation, trees, pruning, things like that. So, I have had Elroy working on unit cost for those items and I think what we are ready to do is pull together a meeting between the parks department and MDC representative, look at what the likely future cost of that maintenance are and, then, we need to figure out, you know, will the parks department continue to be responsible for maintenance of the new streetscape. Will MDC be putting funds towards the additional maintenance that's above and beyond what's out there today and we need to investigate some of those items and bring it to City Council. De Weerd: I guess, Steve, one of the things that MDC can't do is maintenance, so we are -- I guess -- Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 16 of 30 Siddoway: So, there will be additional maintenance and we need to figure out how that relationship looks like. De Weerd: What we will do is put the cost to it, so as the improvements are made, those considerations are certainly taken into account as to the impact on the city's general fund. Just like the discussion with the Greenfield and how we can shift some of that to Greenfield for redevelopment in downtown, we are shifting resources from other areas and putting them downtown as things redevelop and it is a cost. So, we are pulling together that information, so -- as information for the board and that we can work in concert together to make sure that as you bring projects online, that is considered in our next year's budget on the maintenance side. I think Council did suggest at our discussion last month that the city would incur those costs in hopes that at some point maybe the business -- downtown business association, as they do in Boise, takes some of that cost on. It's just an FYI at this point, but we do want to have those discussions with you. Wardle: And any of our new board members who haven't met Steve Siddoway, the new parks director, Steve was formerly with the planning department and worked diligently on urban renewal from its inception. So, I actually learned a lot more from urban renewal -- about urban renewal from Steve than I do about parks and he's been a great resource for us. So, you have a soft spot in your heart for downtown; right? Siddoway: A real soft spot for downtown and I couldn't be more happy that these types of discussions are ongoing and the downtown redevelopment is progressing. De Weerd: Okay. Len. Grady: Mayor, one of the things that I failed to talk about is water. I had my sewer hat on. We do have quite a bit of water available downtown. We have got good flow from multiple places. However, we do have areas with very small water lines, some, unfortunately, two inch, three inch, four inch water lines. So, you might ask, well, why don't we just go and up-size those. Well, if we up-size them to an eight inch and we put a super large building there that needs a lot of fire flow, we will have to rip it out and put in a ten or a 12 inch. The water is very easy to put in. It's fairly straight forward. Not a lot of issues there, but -- and, like I say, we do have a good -- good surrounding system that provides as much fire flows of what we need out there, it's just a question of up -grading those pipes once we are absolutely sure we know what's going downtown, so -- 0 Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 17 of 30 De Weerd: Thank you, Len. Any further questions? Staff, have you been able to identify all your issues? Bird: Downtown issues. De Weerd: Boy, did I open a can of worms. Bird: Yeah. I was going to say -- De Weerd: As it relates to downtown. The key discussion points you wanted to have. Canning: Well, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Members of the MDC Board, if there is a different division for the block between Main and Meridian Street, I guess we need to come forward with some idea on how to resolve that conflict and some direction from Council and MDC would be helpful on that. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes. Borton: To add onto that, I was just going to bring that up. We talked about that to give MDC an opportunity to share, you know, their vision on that issue and also I think the rail corridor was talked about as well and types of uses and building height issues and hear what MDC has comments, thoughts, about that, whether it's aligned or not aligned or -- Canning: I think we are closer on the rail corridors, because we are not part of that historic part and I think I had -- when I presented to Council I may not have had it quite a clear as it was later made to me, but it does -- it does allow for taller stories right next to the rail corridors, but, then, the police department -- or the fire department had comments on that one. So, that was more I think internal, rather than with MDC Board. Borton: And you said they wanted to weigh in -- Canning: Yeah. Borton: -- on the topic -- Canning: Definitely. Wardle: Craig just asked if I could sort of frame the issue for the board. 0 0 Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 18 of 30 De Weerd: Yes. Wardle: So, I'll frame the rail corridor area issue, because I think it's less complicated. Chief Anderson brought up the -- the subject of potential volumes of traffic on the rail corridor, hauling items that may not be conducive to urban living and so one of those issues was what -- if you front up a lot of density on that corridor, specifically right along the corridor, what happens if you have a derailment. What happens if you have some sort of an emergency and one of the things that he asked for everyone to think about is if you step that off a number of bocks or a block, does that help the safety of the corridor. So, that was a discussion along the rail. I think the urban planning vision has really -- most of the time been front up as much against these as you can along the corridor, because that provides an opportunity for light rail and, then, some of those things. The real issue, I think, here in the rail corridor is we are not sure what our transit mode is going to be. The rail corridor continues to function as a thoroughfare for goods right now. That could change in the future, but right now it's not at that -- at that element. The Main - Meridian -- did I get that, Anna? Okay. The Main - Meridian discussion that we've had is -- is really as the split corridors goes in and we have five lanes of traffic along Meridian Road, the current design standards call for no more than three stories, is that -- Bird: It's five. Wardle: With a step back core, but the height is the issue in terms of -- we've had some property owners and some people looking at -- at the scope of downtown and wondering if they can take advantage of more of that traffic and vertically integrate it to potentially higher than four stories. That's the discussion, really, between Main and Meridian as it relates, essentially, from the tracks all the way to Fairview Avenue and Cherry Lane. So, that the -- Canning: Madam Mayor, President Slocum had -- or Chairman Slocum. Slocum: President. I like that. Canning: And the issue of the taller building is -- when you have a taller building, usually, you have less of the site developed as building, because you have got to have the parking somewhere on it, unless it's subterranean or built into the design. So, there is an issue about how much of the lot is covered is one of them, because we're looking for kind of a solid building facade along those streets, particularly along Main Street, because we want to make it pedestrian friendly. And the other thing was with over three or four steps -- four stories is that you create wind tunnels and so the environment becomes generally less 0 0 Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 19 of 30 friendly to pedestrians. You know, you can go to downtown Boise and walk the different streets and you will get a different feeling for those that have the taller buildings and a different climate, a different feel. So, that's kind of the different provisions that we have heard expressed thus far. De Weerd: Well, I guess that makes it if the building height is such it makes it more critical that you have surface parking in strategic places throughout downtown. So, again, it's one of coordination and if the buildings are taller, what do we -- how do we replace that parking element. So, those are future discussion points. Just want to plant the bug in your ear and make sure it's on your radar as well. I guess the other connection that -- on that Main to Meridian corridor, if you look just north of Washington or north of Carlson, that is kind of in that area that the Historic Preservation Commission is looking at and what homes that they'd like to work on encouraging preservation, looking at what can be placed out there, so that that look can be preserved, but we know it is not the highest and best use and so those are -- that's another area that needs further discussion and they have started those discussions. But as you can see with the green line that -- those are the sewer lines. That shows you that -- that they are not -- they are not in the street and most of Old Town area they are in the alleys or on the property -- on the back property line. So, that particular area on that north side between Main and Meridian has been a topic of conversation certainly with. staff, as is the area between Main and probably 2nd 1/2 as well. Does that kind of sum up some of the issue pieces that we talked about, Anna or Len? Grady: Yeah. De Weerd: Yes? No? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes. Borton: Len, can you give a quick explanation on this -- Grady: I wasn't -- I really wasn't aware that that was going to be passed it out, but -- De Weerd: Well, I know, because it has my notes on it. Grady: All that is is that's -- that's just work that shows which direction the sewer flows, so -- to get a handle on the -- and color is size, yes. Green is -- green is eight inch and the -- anything non -green is big. And blue is ten and I don't remember the colors. Actually, I know red is 12. Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 20 of 30 Bird: And what is -- is yellow eight? Grady: It's going to be eight or more -- thereabouts, so -- and we highlighted phase one on what you thought would develop first. Of course, now we have an 18 inch running right through that, so we should be -- we should be fine. Wardle: One of the things we looked at on the sewer capacity was where -- where did MDC feel that the largest consolidation of growth in the downtown core would stem from, so that's what you see in phase one and that's -- that was the area from which all of the subject studies sort of grew in terms of what is our capacity here, when will it be absorbed. Canning: Madam Mayor, I'm sorry, I missed your question the first time. I didn't hear it. De Weerd: Just the discussion about the preservation of some of the houses on Main Street or the Carlson -- the issues with the sewer line between Main and Meridian and also Main and 2nd 1/2 Street. Those are areas that have been identified as issues. Canning: And we are -- with regard to preservation of the homes, we have worked on the design guidelines for those areas and we will try and come up with additional incentives for maintaining those, converting them to office uses, but maintaining those to make a little more financial feasible -- I think there is opportunity for us to do that, similar to what we did with the in lieu fees, you know. Basically, the in lieu fees, they are not having to provide parking for any existing square footage. That's the big incentive. And that will continue in that area as well, but we could look for other things, too. Slocum: Anna, could I clarify? Is that planning staffs desires to maintain those homes or is that Council's desire? Canning: It was an issue that was bought up during the 2002 hearing. It is not something we are going to mandate, but it's something we want to at least accommodate for those folks that want to make it possible for them to maintain those. De Weerd: It was bought up in 2002. It has been a community priority and it's also been a concern, because the design guidelines bring the buildings to the sidewalk and you're going to have a little patchwork look if somehow to, then, encourage to redevelop or if some houses redevelop to the highest and best use versus those that are gutted and improved as is. So, it really was the desired 0 Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 21 of 30 look in that area, how can you build consistent incentives to encourage the desired look, not to prohibit the highest and best use, but to achieve the desired look. So, I guess that we see as a real issue. Certainly the Historic Preservation Commission would like to see those preserved. They have no legal basis. I mean even if you're on the historical preservation list, there is nothing regulatory on that. So, it's what is the desired look for that area and how can we create incentives to achieve that. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes. Borton: Anna, are we -- we are not setting ourselves up for a situation where there is sort of alternative compliance where we could have one parcel build to the property line and the next one would be a house and have a really inconsistent look? De Weerd: That's our fear and that's what we still need to have further discussion in -- Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council for MDC, we don't have design guidelines for that area. That's going to -- that's going to be a tricky area for us, because it's kind of a subset of that urban core there, but I don't know that we do want to bring buildings up to the front and it will be an interesting discussion when we get to that point. You know, once you get out of that historical house part of the city where it's intended to be pedestrian traffic, what -- where do you want those buildings placed. Do we want some separation between those or do we want a solid facade -- I don't think we have ever had those discussions in depth and it's certainly something we need to work on. Wardle: If I can just point out the current zone is C -C, which would be, I think, probably inconsistent to the vision that we are talking about of more saving of historic areas, would that be a correct assumption, Anna? Canning: Well -- Wardle: The more — the more intensive business uses that are currently principally permitted in this -- in this area than would -- probably we would see if they kept the homes -- or the structures and -- Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Members of the MDC, I can't visualize the two zoning districts in my head right now, but Old Town has quite a few number of principally permitted uses, probably similar to most of -- of any 0 Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 22 of 30 other district would be C -C. So, they probably are fairly similar in the nature of the uses they allow -- now, the character of development clearly would be different, but in the Old Town planning designation the thought is that, eventually, that would be zoned Old Town to correspond with the Comprehensive Plan designation. De Weerd: Well -- and, actually, the definition, because it wasn't included in the design standards down here, is what is the appropriate scale. So, I think there is just a lot of questions in those areas and we will want to work closely together on developing that vision, to make sure we are all talking off the same sheet. Jones: Right. Well, Madam Mayor and City Council, other members of the MDC Board, I'm just thinking more and more about the challenge we have of providing adequate parking for downtown. I think the real deterrent right now to try to get a business to come downtown is the parking. I'm meeting tomorrow with a potential buyer for the Nazarene church, but he says without a parking structure nearby, I don't see how I can make this thing work. And that is a challenge we are going to have. You know, to afford a parking structure today -- or course Keith and I have talked about it many times -- I don't know -- we can't justify it today, unless someone steps up and takes a very low interest rate loan and we have people wanting to pay 50 bucks a month to park. I think that's a challenge we are going to have to get downtown developed is to find adequate parking for those people who will locate a business downtown. And I don't know what the solution is. If we had a parking structure it would be great, but the fellow that wants to buy the Nazarene church, he said a parking structure going in the back where those parking places are now would be great, but how do you finance a parking structure and make it work. I don't know what the solution is. I look at the one in Bend, Oregon. They built a nice parking structure with the down floor - - main floor is all retail, but, you know, it hasn't leased out yet. There is a post office in there and about half the down floor, downstairs, is empty. And, you know, downtown Bend is a vibrant little town, but -- Bird: The parking structure come after the business come down. Jones: The parking structure -- it's not cash flowing. You know, they have got two floors above the retail for parking and it's not cash flowing and that's -- they got a problem there feeding that thing, so I guess we are going to have a problem downtown Meridian finding parking that's adequate for the downtown businesses that want to locate downtown. I just see it as a big challenge. I know Shaun has worked on it and we are working it and working it. 0 0 Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 23 of 30 Wardle: We are working diligently and we have a request in. I met with a member of senior loan committee members at one of our community banks that had expressed some interest in looking at that at a low interest rate, so -- Jones: Like zero, uh? Wardle: You know the bank well and I don't think that it's a zero arrangement. Jones: I'm afraid not. But that is a big challenge we have, Mayor and Council, MDC is -- the more I talk to people that want to come downtown, that issue comes up quite often, where am I going to have my clients park and I really haven't been able to give them an answer yet. I know we are working on it, but it's got to be convenient parking for the clients, so -- that's my two bits worth. Canning: Of course, a governmental entity is having a similar problem downtown -- Jones: I think so. Rountree: Minor detail. Jones: You know, Mayor, one more comment. The Greenfield versus the Old Town hook-up fees, you know, I'd like to see us go with the lower fee for downtown to try to encourage businesses to come downtown. You have got a 50 percent fee, it's not that much in dollars and cents, but it might be a little more enticement to try to bring development to downtown, which we are so desperately trying to do. So, you know, I'd just like to see maybe a little lower hook-up fees for the downtown core. Slocum: Yeah. I have been asked if anything -- you know, we, as an urban renewal agency of the city can do to incentivize coming downtown versus some other city or some other location. I don't know if you have been presented before with a plan, but -- Rountree: We have. Turlington: I was also really sort of intrigued with your comments, Councilman, on ACHD -- the city of Boise, rather, perhaps bringing legislation that would exempt urban renewal districts from impact fees. You know, certainly, you know, that should be an indefinite period, but if there is discussion, it would be interesting to see how that's framed and if there is, you know, a one year or two year window where it could be presented to businesses that, you know, here is your opportunity get in now and, then, understand what that impact fee might be 0 • Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 24 of 30 to ACHD, the impact off of impact fees and, then, really, how does that affect their ability to provide services throughout the rest of the district. So, that's a really interesting -- especially if you're in the five to ten to 12 dollars for a commercial building, that gets really pricey and if there is a window open for some businesses to come down and come in and build something and have that not on the balance sheet, it could be make a big difference. But, in the end, you know, there has to be a lot of facts put on the table, obviously. Jones: Scott and others have -- and I agree with you, I think if we can have a lower impact fee, make sure in the short run, but in the long run we are way ahead to get development going and get them on the tax rolls, because we will make it up down the road. On the short end of it, it's better to have a low impact fee, so you would bring people into the urban renewal agency, that district. Rountree: Madam Mayor, I might comment on that issue. I think, yeah, it has merit, but it also has a potential to backfire, given the mood and tenor of the legislature and their feelings for urban renewal districts at this point. So, I think if that issue is forced it could have -- Jones: True. Rountree: -- ramifications on whether or not we even have urban renewal districts. Turlington: It would be great if we could shift that mood and tenor and their dislike towards urban renewal districts to ACHD. De Weerd: Bite your tongue. Bird: It's not only ACHD, but Nampa and — Madam Mayor? I realize that the parking is probably very major and impact fees and all that and I'm for encouraging anything we can get downtown, because it's pretty hard in an economy right now that's down, that I'm going to come down and pay in excess of 25 dollars a square foot when I can go out to an EI Dorado or to a Centre Pointe and have all kinds of room for five to seven dollars a square foot. I think our big challenge is to figure out -- is to make it that people want to come downtown. Right now we have nothing to bring them downtown. Hopefully, that's -- I know that was Tammy and I's dream for City Hall at least sparking some to be coming downtown, because let's all face the facts, we could have went one mile to the east and paid a lot less money and had a lot more ground. But we made a commitment back in '98 when we first come on board that we were going to stay downtown with the City Hall. So, we could sit and debate and we can give lower hook-up fees, which might help, but I don't think -- I don't think 0 Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 25 of 30 that's your underselling deal. Your parking's not underselling -- you have something -- you got to have a reason to have a parking structure. CCDC and -- didn't have a parking first, they got the business down there and, then, they made the parking structure they had built and be paid for. Shaun's working his tail off to get us some on -surface parking, which I think that would really help. But we -- we need to have something to encourage the people to downtown, because we not only have small lots -- and I see MDC as being a tool to go buy some ground, so that a developer can come down and he can buy -- if we have got a hundred thousand square foot or so -- I mean of land, we don't tell him to go out and buy 60 different properties, we have already got it taken care of, because downtown is very small lots and you have got to go buy -- we got to have the land if we want to encourage people down and I -- I think there is numerous areas that we have to work on. And I, for one, am willing to work diligently to get the people downtown. I want to see our downtown grow, but I don't think a parking structure is going to bring people down. I don't think impact fee relief is going to bring people down. I wish I had a crystal ball and could know what was going to bring them down. That's my two cents worth. I think we just need to really work and, hopefully, September 1st when we are all set up in City Hall, people will start coming down and maybe we can get the little shops in and I know Shaun's working his tail off to get some interest downtown there and we are not going to get -- we are not going to get the big financial deals, we are not going to get a Washington Square or BoDos or anything like that, but if we could get an enlarged Hyde Street, I would be -- Hyde Park, I would be happy. Zaremba: Just one quick thought. The downtown marketing plan study identified a number of things that could be done and I think most people have bought into them. One of the simplest things they suggested that we have not done yet -- and maybe I'll call it low hanging fruit -- is put up signs around and point to downtown. That's cheap. That's something we could do pretty easy, pretty quick. Wardle: Good idea. I'm writing it down. I have just one other -- one other issue - - and I know Len just presented this in terms of Greenfield versus -- versus lower for downtown and he used the term I think five percent, Len? If fees were reduced 50 percent in the urban renewal area, but they would only increase five percent in the city wide -- and here is where I think today our focus -- today our focus is parking, retail, and office, but I think when we look at the types of housing -- and I know it's not our focus current, but if we look to the future, that may be an incentive that would drive higher density work force affordability in terms of housing. That is something that I know developers plug in and they plug in not only ACHD's impact fees, but they plug in sewer -- sewer connection, water connection and -- 0 0 Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 26 of 30 Zaremba: Parks. Wardle: -- and park connection fees and it may be an opportunity to look to -- that that one issue may swing a project in terms of the affordability of their housing. We have talked that we don't think Meridian in the short term will become a 600,000 dollar condo market downtown Meridian, so if we are looking for more affordable work force housing, that may be a tool that could be researched further. De Weerd: Anything further? Borton: Madam Mayor? Is there correlation between what MDC's doing with Visual Genesis and some of that modeling and the underlying infrastructure data that -- that Len in his report talks about, so when a project wants to come in and develop project X on this parcel, not only could visually explain how it fits in the zoning, but also how it impact existing infrastructure, sewer capacity, as an example. This makes reference to -- doesn't talk about the impact of development outside the core on downtown capacity. Is there some overlay that -- that allows that to be presented? Grady: Well, certainly, if there any -- any information they have that would improve the knowledge we have of what's going to happen downtown, we would use -- and be able to fine tune to get better information. So, I think, unfortunately, there is probably not -- not too much we can send your direction. Slocum: I think that it would -- I don't know if Joe's headed where I'm heading, but, you know, as an architect we do projects in vicinities where we can pull up 3- D mapping and turn on the layer that shows where sewer lines are, what capacity they have; water lines, what capacity they have, so that in a very short time a developer can determine what the scope of my project is. If the information you have provided today is in a format that we can layer it in our Visual Genesis, it would be very helpful Grady: The problem I have, though, is we approved Pinebridge, which is up there, yeah, and that relieves you of that capacity. Slocum: Yeah. And maybe it's not the detail of specific capacity, maybe it's lines and line location, line size, so that I'm looking at, you know, compiling five pieces and I know I'm going to have to relocate a ten inch sewer main, I'd rather know it up front and build it into my project or I know I have to move a building here and not have do it, those kinds of things. Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 27 of 30 Grady: I guess what I'm saying is that we can probably get our GIS people in touch and, you know, and figure out if there is overlap for their information. Borton: Madam Mayor? Is it too early in what you guys are doing with Visual Genesis to talk about -- maybe that's way outside the scope of what they are doing in the first phase, but -- Wardle: What we are doing right now is we are base -- we are base mapping the urban renewal area and so that will provide us, really, the ability to add layers, as was talked about. And we will talk tomorrow about -- with our consultant what that means. But as I understand it, this has become a tool that architects and engineers, if we give them the keys, they can take it out and you can color everything pink and make it 20 stories for purposes of looking at what that would look like, if -- once we have the tools in place. So, there is a very real possibility and we will take that into consideration. Grady: How long do you think before the tool would be in place? In other words, once you start it, a six month model or -- Wardle: I would think a couple months. Josh? Grant: I think in a couple months. I'd like to have it six months -- Grady: And the reason I'm asking is we are going to update the sewer model, we are going to get better information and that's probably what we would want to utilize. Bird: Len, is there any way on the Five Mile Trunk that some of that at the northern edge of it could be diverted into White Trunk -- Grady: I think there are -- Bird: -- and give us more capacity at Five Mile? Grady: I think are opportunities upstream and downstream to -- Bird: At one time when we looked at it I thought -- De Weerd: And that's what the survey is looking at. Bird: Yeah. That's what we -- at one time that was brought up. De Weerd: In phase two. 0 0 Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 28 of 30 Bird: Yes. De Weerd: Charlie? Rountree: Madam Mayor, I know we have talked about this sewer subject in the middle of town and have the opportunity yet, again, to maybe explorer some possibilities with development. With the industry that was there out, I don't know if it's time to look at maybe rezoning that if we can, if that's appropriate. I know the railroad's lost their personal representative in this area. I don't know if a new one's been appointed or hired at this point in time, nor do I know if they are going to do that. I have no idea what Meridian did to the railroad to have them not receptive to anything that we are proposing to them, but I think now is not a bad time to see if we can't open up a dialogue with the railroad to see if there is something that they would like to partner with us and clean up the mess that they have created in our downtown. I think between Bank of the Cascades, the city's investment, and some other things that we talked about coming into downtown, maybe the railroad can take a look at what they have created down there or let happen down there. Maybe there is -- maybe we are in a situation where maybe they can get a little more out of that property by partnering with the city or partnering with MDC. I know there is all kinds of feelings that have been hatched -- already hatched, but to me those deals are not going to come to fruition unless the railroad let's it happen. I think we have got to approach them to see if there is some way that they can work with the City of Meridian. I don't think they are selling it at this point in time, but I would think that it would be appropriate to -- and they certainly could be a better citizen and a better neighbor to the City of Meridian, given the investment going on in downtown and the direction we want to go. I don't know if they have heard our story again or need to hear our story again, but I think we need to sell our story again and we need to get at the right body. De Weerd: Ted, do you have any thoughts you want to share? Baird: I think maybe Councilman Rountree is trying to -- De Weerd: I was sort of thinking the same thing. Baird: In all seriousness, there is -- they are really hard to read. Rountree: I understand that. Baird: But the situation you described there is probably an opportunity to re - approach them and we might be surprised -- 0 • Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 29 of 30 Rountree: Well, I'm looking at MDC, looking at -- you know, Clarence has got a fair amount of clout in the financial community and experience and connections. He certainly can be part of the ambassador group that can talk to the railroad representing MDC and the concerns of the city, part of a major investment group that sees downtown Meridian as something other than a derelict site for old railroad cars and old dilapidated buildings. So, I would start there and build a team of folks that could strategize and put together an approach to first deal with the new state representative, that personal representative -- if there is one. I have not heard of a replacement for Charlie Clark at this point in time. I don't know if there is. Have you heard, Clarence? Jones: I haven't, Charlie. Baird: Ryan, is there one? Rountree: I think we need -- you know, I just hate to give up. To me, it's really an opportunity for the railroad to shine. Baird: Madam Mayor? Rountree: And they don't shine well in Idaho right now, quite frankly, because they told commerce in Idaho that we are not going to help your commerce with additional rail capacity unless you have way more units per month than anything industry can provide from the state of Idaho. So, they are losing the political clout that they used to have. Baird: Madam Mayor, Member of the Council, and MDC Commission, I think Councilmember Rountree's point is a good one. They, for whatever reason, that when the city speaks it falls on deaf ears at the railroad. Money is important to them, but if they are approached by the local businesses with a solid plan, it's probably going to be better received than partnership that we have been seeking in the past that are foreign words to them. That's all I have to add at this point. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: I would just comment on two experiences that probably everybody knows about. Valley Regional Transit and its previous version Via Transit and everything else has been trying to work with the railroad for many many years and has been having pretty much the same experience that Meridian has. In their initial contacts when the railroad thought nobody wanted the land, it was Meridian City County / MDC Workshop January 15, 2008 Page 30 of 30 going to be cheap, but when they showed interest all of a sudden -- you know, they'd give it away if nobody wanted it, but when you looked like you wanted it, all of a sudden the price skyrockets. That's a similar bad experience that's been going on and certainly the railroad has heard from people in this area, because they are hearing from Valley Regional Transit. But on the good side of the experience, somehow Boise managed to buy -- I don't know how much, a couple miles -- several miles of that railroad track. I don't remember exactly where it is. I think it starts about where Micron is and, then, goes farther out for another couple of miles. But whoever Boise worked that deal out with, maybe we should get some advice from, unless we already have. De Weerd: Well, in consideration of time, maybe Ted and Shaun, you can put your heads together and identify an ambassador's team -- Wardle: We will. De Weerd: If the timing is right and I think that the city experienced considerable delay and an unfortunate situation happened and it seemed like all of a sudden we got a lease. So, maybe the timing is right to start those discussions. So, if there is nothing further from either board, I would entertain a motion to close. Bird: So moved. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: We have a motion to close. All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Thank you. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:42 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) ATTESTED:- -7,oz 4e� MAYOR T MY De WEERD ATTESTED: y tee 19 1 06 ........... DATE APPROVED 3 -BERG -JR., CITY OLE K k ; MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 15, 2008 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 3-A REQUEST Update on New City Hall Building Construction AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Emailed: Date: Phone: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. MERIDIAN 000l� I VAN 4f W4 MONTHLI PORT Y.I 2008 ITY HALL JAN u,a R *C�, �E IDIN�-- AHC Meridian Citi Hall Monthly Report January, 2008 Table of Contents: ' Section 1 Section 2 ! Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Executive Summary Schedule LEED Financial AS I's RF I's Submittals Photos SCHEDULE: o Project is on schedule with no remaining float. o Critical path for the Project is M.E.P. rough -in followed by computer flooring and drywall. o The South Y2 of the building is in the dry and computer flooring has started. o The North Y2 of the building is partially enclosed and partially roughed -in. LEED'S: o Project is scheduled for Silver LEED's accreditation. o Targeted points are 34 points out of a range of 33-38 for Silver. o We are waiting for computer simulation results for the mechanical system to confirm energy performance points. FINANCIAL: o Phase IV Plaza. Bid Package is at $1.7mm to $2.2mm (depending on deductive alternates). o The resulting building budget is $19.9mm to $20.4mm. o Phase I, II, and III are 46% billed to date. ' ASI' S: o There is a total of 57 ASI's issued to date. o Resulting change orders are being processed and a requested time extension of 27 days is being evaluated. RFI' S: o There is a total of 74 RFI's to date; two are active and 72 are closed. SUMBITTALS: o There is a total of 167 submittals to date; 14 are active and 153 are approved. Ah AIN --- ---- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---• ---- ----- --- -- ------ - ----- m---- ----- ----- --------------- _-____ ___-_-_ ------ ------------------ __ __--_____ ------ _____ _.____ _-____ -------_______.-_.O_ ��_ ___ ___._ ❑._____ _ ----------... __________.__ ______ _._ $ $ m F. ---- ' ' Z m � r --------------------------------------- �1 ¢ LL9 ________ _____ ______ _--------------- --------------- ________ _____________ _______-------------- ______ __ _________ _____ ______________ ______ _______________ ------------- r n n n n n n n n �n o A n n n m �m n n c Imo n m m ,o m m mo n m m n o E U LL F � � IL li li LL IL 'LL ` m H LL LL c C LL C C C C LL LL C m ❑ pp K pp K O Z O ❑ O = O O y € Z �N 2 N 2 m Z F f❑T pZ pmp Z m Z Z K g 8O N ul N O g O Q O J m 2 Z !sA Z❑ U C `� fA Z W 2 LL ❑ ❑ Q�9 9N qg2 gZ9 Ne� Z ZO trh ZO Z zz z °�WW��Zw M w > o3 o z zrL °'rc" °°°°O°MM oz o W❑ w $W 9 `W o o z z o o 0 o g g o "LLw °LLw °LLw °LLw g o 0 0 8d $ a �a ®®®®®®®® ®®®® ts; $ '$ 9 $ a $ 'w ,% a' a� 3 2 N G IR U O a: ; o� LL p ulF IL .... Q z w � J 7 ° v U a . N ❑ � Q z ai 3 i � a � --- ---- ------ -- --- --- --- --- --- -- --------- --- --- --- -------- - --- -- ---- - ------ ------ -- ---- -- ------ -------- - KN OCL o o O 0 > g � S� 6 LL p LL a O W MU iii P ----------------------------------------- N ..... ••• ::: 0--- ---- -------------------- ---------° Y ...1 LUZ N J O F Z 0 p C3 Z a ------------------------ ----------- ---------------- W n S _ o. m N fes0 p Op 3 m ~ F- -0 O ~ 3 F- m >> ~ 0 ~ C O C O N m C G O O>> ~ N ~ m ~ C O C C ',� O '3 C O N 3 C L L LL LL P L LL L LL L LL LL L LL 0 C LL O F LL L LL t -LL 'L t+l � MMMV LL LU W Z F N Z p 50 N c� F U m N W Q Q Z m O N J W w w z y N Q m a S N d N ( w) O p LL N N _N Z :Z zi O 3 N o 'l?J z w o y F" ❑ O o O w O N W O Z LL' a' Z 1�' . W w Z O ¢ y O ?� O O H> J O O O J N ��w N Q O w 3 Q O K C7 g u"S w Q ZS p I�-. N hZ' ''.o a 1 W N K Z CW -)i K uw1 y � ¢ °° w a ❑ � O w y W O s o u' ''� Q '.} m0 o N a z o❑ LL w �p a U O :.U_' '_ a o$ (i w '3 =O F R o o w a J¢ m U o N Y o w g> F U- 3 n $ m> z ¢ '� 'O ❑ w a w s J FJ LL o w a O N3Z. m m t- 1 O Q ',a z LL U `�` ''o K U O w w w ❑ F a '¢ w '� w '.7 tL 3 I U d a ui w O o ❑ o ¢ m m VO m N N 3 m o w w m m N w LL 3❑¢ :c�i a 3 0 'w ❑ coi ¢ N g ii f m c"i o m o � O �- N M � �O m r m Q! O '- N M a m m n m at � N N N m N N N W th th f7 � � � m M m C7 O O V M �❑ LEED for New Construction v2.2 Registered Project Checklist Project Name: Project Address: �OQ Sustainable Sites xi�w 14 Points a 1 Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Required 1 Site Selection 1 2 Development Density & Community Connectivity 1 3 Brownfield Redevelopment 1 4.1 Alternative Transportation, Public Transportation Access 1 4.2 Alternative Transportation, Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms 1 4.3 Alternative Transportation, Low -Emitting & Fuel -Efficient Vehicles 1 4.4 Alternative Transportation, Parking Capacity 1 5.1 Site Development, Protect or Restore Habitat 1 5.2 Site Development, Maximize Open Space 1 6.1 Stormwater Design, Quantity Control 1 6.2 Stormwater Design, Quality Control 1 7.1 Heat Island Effect, Non -Roof 1 7.2 Heat Island Effect, Roof 1 8 Light Pollution Reduction 1 innntsolwater EfficiencPoints - I Credit 1.1 Water Efficient Landscaping, Reduce by 50% 1 1 Credit 1.2 Water Efficient Landscaping, No Potable Use or No Irrigation 1 7 Credit 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies 1 °I Credit 3.1 Water Use Reduction, 20% Reduction 1 1 Credit 3.2 Water Use Reduction, 30% Reduction 1 Prereq 1 Fundamental Commissioning of the Building Energy Systems Required ? Prereq 2 Minimum Energy Performance Required l Prereq 3 Fundamental Refrigerant Management Required *Note for EAcl : All LEED for New Construction projects registered after June 26 ", 2007 are required to achieve at least two (2) points under EAc1. ®Credit 1 O timize Energy Performance 1 to 10 10.5% New Buildings or 3.5% Existing Building Renovations 1 14% New Buildings or 7% Existing Building Renovations 2 17.5% New Buildings or 10.5% Existing Building Renovations 3 21% New Buildings or 14% Existing Building Renovations 4 24.5% New Buildings or 17.5% Existing Building Renovations 5 28% New Buildings or 21 % Existing Building Renovations 6 31.5% New Buildings or 24.5% Existing Building Renovations 7 8 35% New Buildings or 28% Existing Building Renovations 8 38.5% New Buildings or 31.5% Existing Building Renovations 9 42% New Buildings or 35% Existing Building Renovations 10 ®credit 2 On -Site Renewable Energy 1 to 3 2.5% Renewable Energy 1 7.5% Renewable Energy 2 12.5% Renewable Energy 3 1 Credit 3 Enhanced Commissioning 1 1 H Credit 4 Enhanced Refrigerant Management 1 I Credit 5 Measurement & Verification 1 1 credits Green Power 1 i Yes 7 No FFRRF 3 12 18 - - ■. i 1 Storage & Collection of Recyclables Required 1.1 Building Reuse, Maintain 75% of Existing Walls, Floors & Roof 1 1.2 Building Reuse, Maintain 100% of Existing Walls, Floors & Roof 1 1.3 Building Reuse, Maintain 50% of Interior Non -Structural Elements 1 2.1 Construction Waste Management, Divert 50% from Disposal 1 2.2 Construction Waste Management, Divert 75% from Disposal 1 3.1 Materials Reuse, 5% 1 3.2 Materials Rouse, 10% 1 4.1 Recycled Content, 10% (post -consumer + %a pre -consumer) 1 4.2 Recycled Content, 20% (post -consumer + % pre -consumer) 1 5.1 Regional Materials, 10% Extracted, Processed & Manufactured Regions 1 5.2 Regional Materials, 20% Extracted, Processed & Manufactured Regions 1 6 Rapidly Renewable Materials 1 7 Certified Wood 1 M©Q Indoor Environmental'QualitM X15 Points Prereq 1 Prereq 2 Credit 1 Credit 2 Credit 3.1 Credit 3.2 Credit 4.1 Credit 4.2 Credit 4.3 Credit 4.4 Credit 5 Credit 6.1 Credit 6.2 Credit 7.1 Credit 7.2 Credit 8.1 Credit 8.2 Minimum IAQ Performance Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring Increased Ventilation Construction IAQ Management Plan, During Construction Construction IAQ Management Plan, Before Occupancy Low -Emitting Materials, Adhesives & Sealants Low -Emitting Materials, Paints & Coatings Low -Emitting Materials, Carpet Systems Low -Emitting Materials, Composite Wood & Agrifiber Products Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control Controllability of Systems, Lighting Controllability of Systems, Thermal Comfort Thermal Comfort, Design Thermal Comfort, Verification Daylight & Views, Daylight 75% of Spaces Daylight & Views, Views for 90% of Spaces Required Required 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 70mmminnovation & Design Process ,Points 1 Credit 1.1 Innovation In Design: Provide Specific Title Credit 1.2 Innovation in Design: Provide Speck Title t Credit 1.3 Innovation in Design: Provide Speck Title Credit 1.4 Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title 1 Credit LEED®Accredited Professional Yes 7 No Certified: 26-32 points, Silver: 33-38 points, Gold: 39-51 points, Platinum: 52-69 point I'1 • • I Meridian City Hall � ro Meridian, Idaho o� aoNTnncroas December 12, 2007 IDIAN�- 1®C1ti® INCLUDED IN BUDGETS Current Budget December 12, 2007 Current Budget December 12, 2007 1 2 3 I - Buildina Demolition & Abatement 4 Cream= Demolition & Abatement$426,357 $426,357 5 6 Total Phase I - Building Demolition & Abatement $426,357 $426,357 7 8 Phase II - Cor$hall 9 Sitswork & Utilities $610,314' $610 314 10 Structural Concrete $655 595 $655,595 11 Masonry $1,584760 $1,584,760 12 IStructural Steel $1,847,000 $1,847.000 13 1 Rough Ca $0 $0 14 Insulation & Dampproofing $67182 $67,182 15 Roolina & Sheetmetal $182,990 $182,990 16 Exterior Doors $7,820 $7820 17 Storefronts & Curtainwall $295,321 $295,321 18 Shaftwall 'Framing & Drywall $363,287 $363,287 19 Elevator $222,100 $222,100 20 Total Phase II - Core & Shell $5,836,369 $5,836,369 21 22 Phase III - TI1MEP 23 Architectural Metalworks $73,265 $73,265 24 Carpentry -Framing, Backing $112,000 $112,000 25 Cabinetry & Casework $464,000 $464,000 26 Insulation & Dampproofing $22,388 $22,388 27 Interior Doors $277,230 $277,230 28 Interior Storefront $68,678 $68,678 29 Goilina Overhead Doors/Screens $5,590 $5,590 30 Interior Gypsum Drywall Systems $1.038.550 $1,038,550 31 Ceramic Tile $110,953 $110953 32 Resilient Flooring $182,354 $182,354 33 Paint & Wallooverin s $151,275 $151,275 34 Specialties $110 000 $110,000 35 Operable Partitions $20,840 $20,840 36 Access Flooring $528,800 $528,800 37 Window Coverings $11,900 38 Fire Suppression Systems $412,879 39 Plumbin N$:2,060,000 $953,385 40 HVAC $2,060 000 41 Electrical $2 749,895 42 Total Phase III - TI/MEP $9,353,982 43 44Phase IV - Plaza LandscanIMA Site Improvements 45 Sitework & Utilities 46 AC Paving 47 Concrete Paving 48 Landscaping 49 Structural Concrete 50 Masonry 51 Steel Fabrications 52 Framing Carpentry 53 Roofing, Insulation & Waterproofing 54 Doors Frames & Hardware 55 Interior Walls & Painting 56 Specialties 57 Mechanical 58 Electrical 59 Total Phase IV - Plaza, Landscaping & Site Improvements - Total $2,200,000 Total Phase IV - Plaza, Landscaping & Site Improvements - With Deductive Alternates $1,700,000 60 61 FF&E 62 Demountable Walls (Options to $1.163 Million $0 $0 63 Audio Visual S Systems 37 $204 9 $204,3791 64 Telecommunication Systems $219,0001 $219.000 H:\PROJECTS\2006\WesWeddian City Hall\Budgets\Budget History & Projections 12-12-07-8x11 • • 65 Security Systems 84 695 84,695 66 Phone Service & Equipment Provider 67 Interior Signage Package Allowance 25,000 25,00 68 Total FF&E $508,074 $508.074 69 70 Goner 1 0 o Fta 71 Project Reimbursable Cost Allowances $279 812 279 812 72 Phase II General Conditions $181,029 $181029 73 Phase III General Conditions $181,0291 $181!022 74 Construction Contincency & Winter Conditions Allowance $700,000 $700,000 75 Estimated LEED Certification Costs for Silver $205,0 0 $205.000 76 Estimated Value Engineering Allowance $0 $0 77 Contract CM Fee $574,000' $574000 78 CM Fee Pending Chan a Order Change in Scope & Complexity $376,808 $376!808 79 Total General Conditions & Fee $ 497 678 $Z497,678 80 Total Project Direct Costs $20.822,460 $20,322 460 81 82 CmRemoval 22,000 $422,000 84 Unsuitable Soils Removal and Structural Fill for Contm & UnsuiL 79 52 526 85 Total Project Site Costs $801,526 $801,526 86 87 BuIldina Construction Budget w/Site Development Costs $21,623.986 $21,123,986 88 Less Creamery Demolition & Abatement 26,357, 26.357. 89 Less Contaminated and Unsuitable Soils Removal $001,5261 $801.526 90 Current Building Construction Budget $20,396,1031 $19,896,103 H:\PROJECTS\2006\Wes\Meridian City Hall\Budgets\Budget History & Projections 12-12-07-8x11 11 11 11 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 Note Pads I' 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hail Date: 1/8/2008 F_J Project No: 06-0676 Page: 1 of 29 Note PadItern No. Status Required Niall In CourtNotes Opened Closed AS1_.01.__i 'hl t 01 00001 PRO Furnish all labor, materials and equipment 4/20/2007 necessary to revise details A4 and 65 on sheet S3.1 and A3, B3 and C3 on sheet S7.2 as shown on attached sketches dated march 28,2007. 00001 PRO Furnish all labor, material and equipment 6/26/2007 necessary to preform the following work: -Revise the finish floor elevation to 2610.4 -Footings and foundation shall bear on undisturbed native gravel or compacted granular fill per specification section 02300. -Any existing site fill encountered beneath the footings and foundations shall be removed to the undisturbed native sand and gravel. -In areas where removal of contaminated materials has extended below the bottom of footings, the over excavated areas shall be back filled and compacted with granular fill per specification section 02300. -Areas where excavation has occourred to enable the abandonment of water wells shall be backfilled with granular fill per specification section 02300. ASI S ASI Q Q ' 00001 PRO Sheet A3.1: Di - Window Frames Types -revise 6/13/2007 Y frame type 13 per the enclosed Sketch. ' Attachments SK 1 ASI: 04_ ASL N -- ' 00001 PRO Sheet S5.2: The framing layout for the roof 6/26/2007 joists is specified to be at 5 equal spaces; however the framing plan shows 6 equal spaces. The enclosed sketch SK -1 shows the ' appropriate number of joists and spaces. ' Sheet S7.5, Detail E4: Revise the detail callouts for the TS sections to be TS 20x4x5/16 in lieu of the TS 16x4x5/16. See enclosed sketch SK -2. IAttachments:SK-1, SK -2. EVedi fionO Repoli R NP_01 Note Pads 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hail Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 2 of 29 Note Padltem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed AS1_:05 ASI Wo. 05 00001 PRO Sheet S2.11 and S2.12: Refer to the enclosed 6/26/2007 sheets for revisions required for the top of footing elevations based on the revised grading plan. Sheets S5.2: Revised details D2, D5, D6, and El to reflect a deeper grade beam at the similar conditions on the north side of the building. Sheet S5.3: Revise details Bi, 62, and B3 to reflect the reference to the foundation plan for the T.O.F. elevations. Add the Footing Step Detail D6 to Sheet S5.3. Attachments: Sheets S2.1 and S2.12, Sketches SK -1 thru SK -8. Exped;fion® Report R_NP_01 11 WW- I- ft I ft Note Pads 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 3 of 29 Norte PadItem No. Status Require4Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed A6'1.06 ' llt `<k 41C 00001 NEW In response to the ACHD plan review 6/4/2007 comments, the attached civil drawings reflect the following modifications that have occurred to the civil drawings: 1. Sheet C1.0 has been added regarding construction requirements. Sheet C1.1 2. Keynote 14 has been modified to include ACHD truncated dome requirements. 3. Dimensions have been included to R/W line from centerline for both Meridian and Broadway Road. 4. A dimension has been added showing the distance from centerline of railroad tracks to the south property line. S. Longitudinal and cross slopes have been added. 6. The driveway approach has been modified per ACHD requirements. 7. Detail reference for curb terminus has been added to the plans. See added key note 28. 8. Grade break has been added at the new driveway. 9. Radii at the driveway have added. 10. The radii of the inside curves at the on street parking at on Broadway has been modified to 20' at TBC. 11. The roof drain has been rerouted to the southern seepage led in the parking lot. The seepage bed size has been changed accordingly. 12. The seepage bed located in Broadway Avenue has been eliminated. All storm water from the Broadway Ave right of way will be routed into eiasting storm drain lines in Broadway Avenue. 13. The sand and grease trap elevations have been modified. 14. Key Note 27 has been added for pedestrian ramps at driveway. 15. Key Note 29 has been added for new stop sign at driveway. 16. Key Note 30 has been added for new 4" pvc pipe that is used to tie foundation drainage system into new 48 " dia. manhole per added key note 31. ExpedrdonP Report RNP 01 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 u 11 11 11 11 11 11 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 4 of 29 Note Padltem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed 17. Key Note 32 has been added for reference to curb taper at curb terminus at Broadway Ave. 18. Key Note 33 has been added for connection of inlet etch basin inlet to existing storm drain manhole at Broadway Ave. Sheet C4.1 has be renumbered to Sheet C3.1 Sheet C3.1 19. Source of groundwater data and design infiltration rate has been added. to Sheet C3.1 Sheet C4.2 has been renumbered to Sheet C3.2 Sheet C3.2 20. Note 2 and sub notes 1 through 5 have been added to detail 1 on sheet C3.2 Sheet 0.3 has been renumbered C3.3 Sheet C4.1, C4.2, C4.3, C5.1 and Sheet C5.2 has been added to the set. IExpedition® Report R NP_01 11 11 11 Note Pads 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 9 PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 5 of 29 Note PadItem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed ASI 07 1 ASI"No #its: . 00001 PRO Sheet C1.0: has been added regarding 6/26/2007 construction requirements Sheet CIA: 2. Keynote 14 has been modified to include ACHD truncated dome requirements. 3. Dimensions have been included to R/W line form centerline for both Meridian and Broadway Rd... 4.A dimension has been added showing distance from centerline of railroad tracks to the south property line. 5. Longitudinal and cross slopes have been added. 6. The driveway approach has been modified per ACHD requirements. 7. Detail reference for curb terminus has been added to the plans. See added key note 28. 8. Grade break has been added at the new driveway. 9. Radii at the driveway have added. 10. The radii of the inside curves at the on street parking at on Broadway has been modified to 20' at TBC. 11. The roof drain has been rerouted to the southern seepage bed in the parking lot. The seepage bed size has been changed accordingly. 12. The seepage bed located in Broadway Avenue has been eliminated. All stormwater form the Broadway Avenue right-of-way will be routed into the existing storm drain lines in Broadway Avenue. 13. The sand and grease trap elevations have been modified. 14. Key Note 27 has been added for pedestrian ramps at driveway. 15. Key Note 29 has been added for new stop sign at driveway. 16. Key Not 30 has been added.for new 4" pvc pipe that is used to tie foundation drainage system into new 48" dia. Manhole per added key not 31. 17. Key Note 32 has been added for reference to curb taper at curb terminus at Broadway Expedition® Report R NF_01 Note Pads 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 0 PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 6 of 29 Note PadItem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Ouened Closed Avenue. 18. Key Note 33 has been added for connection of inlet catch basin inlet to existing storm drain manhole at Broadway Ave. Sheet C4.1: Has been renumbered to Sheet C3.1 Sheet C3.1 19: Source of groundwater data and design infiltration rate has been added to sheet C3.1 Sheet C4.2: Has been renumbered to Sheet C3.2 Sheet C3.2: 20. Note 2 and sub notes 1 through 5 have been added to detail 1 on sheet C3.2 Sheet C4.3: has been renumbered to Sheet C3.3 Sheet C4.1, C4.2, C4.3, C5.1 and Sheet C5.2 have been added to the set Attachments: Civil Drawings C1.0, CIA, C2.1, C3.1, C3.2, C3.3, C4.1, C4.2, C4.3, C5.1 and C5.; AS108 00001 PRO Sheet S0.01: Add details C4, CS and D4 to this 6/26/2007 sheet, per enclosed sketches SK -1, SK -2 and SK -3 Sheet S3.1: Revise details A4 and B5 enclosed sketches SK -4 and SIC -5 Sheet S7.2: Revise detail A3 per enclosed sketch SK -4 Attachments: Sketches SK -1 thru SK -6 1 Expfton" Report RNP 01 i..iNote Pads 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 G IRG RAL C014TRACTORS 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 7 of 29 Note PadItem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed ASI.09 _A ;iVtri 09 00001 PRO Elevator Opening Framing: Revise the 6/26/2007 dimensions for the framing locations around the elevators at each level based on the enclosed sketches SK -1 and SK -2. Sheet S7.2: Provide and additional detail C7 showing the increased dimensions between the edge of slab and the perimeter support framing. See enclosed sketch SK -3. 00001 PRO Sheets A4.0, A4.1, A4.2, A4.3: Revise the 6/19/2007 exterior elevations per the enclosed revision sheets: A4.011, A4.111, A4.211, AUR. Sheets A5.0, A5.1, 5.2, A5.3: Revise the wall sections per the enclosed revised sheets: A5.011, A5.111, 5.2, A5.311. , Report R_NP_01 Note Pads' Bill _ a ' Project Name: Meridian City Hall 323-4500 Date: 1/8/2008 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 c� arm 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 ' Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 8 of 29 Note Padltem No. Status Required_ Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed 00001 PRO Sheet S2.31: Revise the dimension between 6/19/2007 beams on gridlines 3 and 10 at the roof transition edge to be V-8". This will correspond with the dimension noted in the referenced detail. Sheet S2.31:Provide an additional detail reference El/S7.6 at the non-bearing edge of the stair vestibule adjacent to gridline F2.5. See enclosed sketch SK -1. Sheet S2.32: Revise the dimension between ' rams on gridlines 3 and 10 at the roof transition edge to be 1"-8". This will correspond with the dimension noted in the referenced detail dimension between the edge of slab and the perimeter support framing. Sheet S2.32: Provide an additional detail reference El/S7.6 at the non bearing edge of ' the stair vestibule adjacent to F10.5. See enclosed sketch SK -2. Sheet S2.42: Revise the dimensions for the elevator deck support beams as shown. See enclosed sketch SK -3. Sheet S7.6: Add detail El showing the configuration of the slab and wall framing at the stair vestibules of the 4th floor. See enclosed sketch SK -4. Attachements: Sketches SK -1 thru SK -4. I00001 PRO Please issue the following clarification to the 6/19/2007 contract documents per attached Stapley Memorandum dated June 15, 2007 'Engineering AS113. ASI NQ 00001 PRO Please issue the following clarification to the 6/25/2007 tcontract documents per attached Stapley Engineering Memorandum dated June 20, 2007. Expedition® Report R NP_O1 Note PadS7 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hail Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0676 Page: 9 of 29 Note PadItem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed ASI 14 AS't Noy 14 00001 PRO 1. Furnish all labor, materials and equipment as 6/26/2007 required to install plastic laminate panels in elevator cars No. 2 and No. 2 as supplied and Installed by the elevator manufacturer. Color of panels shall be 7922-07 Brighton Walnut as manufactured by Wilsonart. 2. Furnish all labor material and equipment necessary to install software as required for card reader access system operation of elevator No. 3. 00001 PRO 1.Fumish all labor, material and equipment as 6/26/2007 required to install drainage fill and filter fabric at foundation drainage system. Drainage fill shall be clean crushed rock containing less then f percent fines passing the No. 200 Sieve. The filter fabric shall be woven or non -woven geotextile filter fabric of PP or polyester fibers, or combination of both. Flow rates range from 110 to 330 gpm per sq. ft. when tested according to ASTM D4491. 2.Install fabric and drainage fill as follows: a.Before installing drainage fill, lay geotextile filter fabric in trench and overlap trench sides. b.Place supporting layer of compacted drainage fill over compacted sub grade to a depth of 4". Install drainage pipe. Add drainage fill such that it is 12" minimum from face of footing and extend over top of footing a minimum of 12". Return drainage fill to face of foundation wall: Place drainage fill layer not exceeding 3 inches in depth. Compact each layer placed. c.After drainage fill has been installed, wrap top of drainage fill with geotextile fabric. Fasten and lap geotextile fabric per manufactures instructions. 3.Foundation drainage system shall run to the 4" pvc pipe connection the foundation drainage system to the 48" diameter manhole as shown on the revised civil drawings. E)qxd; fio,® Report R NP_01 Note Pads - 323 -4504 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 9 FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 10 of 29 Note Paditem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed 00001 NEW Furnish all labor materials, and equipment 6/26/2007 necessary to install a 48" diameter manhole and 4" pvc pipe for the foundation drainage system per key note 30 and 31 shown on the revised civil drawings. AS.11ASI Nor --177- 00001 7 00001 NEW The work shall be carded out in accordance with the following supplemental instructions issued in accordance with the contract documents without change in contract sum or contract time. Prior to proceeding in accordance with this instruction, indicate your acceptance of this instruction, for minor change to the work as consistent with the contract documents and return a copy to the architect. Sheet A5.4 Detail A4: Add the following note: Provide 2" I.D. pipe nozzle outlet in bottom of gutter for connection of drain piping by mechanical. 7/10/2007 Expedition® Report R_NP 01 Note Pads 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 GIMERAL CONTRACTORS 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 0 PHONE: (208) 32314500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 11 of 29 Note Padltem No. Status Required Bali In CourtNotes Opened Closed ASI 18 . ASIA o;18 00001 NEW Sheet S2.41: 1. Connections Grid lines 6 and 7. Remove the moment connection symbol from the V24x55 beams on grids 6 and 7 at the columns on Grid E. Provide a simple gravity connection at these locations. 2. Connectins Grid lines 6 and 7. Provide a moment connection symbol from the W24 x 55 beams on grids 6 and 7 at the columns on Grid G. Provide a rigid frame connection at these locations. 3. W12x16 beams. Provide 1/2" camber at all W12x16 beams with spans greater than 25 feet. Sheet S2.42: 1.Connections Grid line 7. Remove the moment connection symbol from the W24 x 55 beam on grid 7 at the column on Grid E. Provide a simple gravity connection at this location. 2. Connections Grid line 7. Provide a moment connection symbol from the W 24 x 55 beam on grid 7 at the column on Grid G. Provide a rigid frame connection at these locations. 3. W12 x 16 Beams. Provide 1/2" camber at all W12 x 16 beams with spans greater than 25 feet. t 1 1 1 1 1 EVedftn, 7/13/2007 Report R NF_01 11 11 if 11 Note Pad§7 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 11812008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 12 of 29 Note Padltem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed E)qndibonO 00001 NEW Sheet S2.41: Show 6 x 6 steel columns in canopy area build out at grids 6 and 7. See sketch SK -1. Sheet 52.52: 1. Provide dimensions for the locations of the TS sections that span east/west beyond grid A at the west side canopy. These TS members, TS 20x4x5/16 are supported by the bracing located at the column noted in item #1. See sketch SK -2. 2. Delete the TS 20x4x5/16 shown midway between grids 6 and 7 spanning from grid H to the TS20x4x5/16 at the entry column line. See sketch SK -2. Sheet S7.4 Detail E4: Add TS 6x6.1/4" column and the dimension locating the column. This column was shown in detail e4/S7.5 and in the architectural drawings, but was not reflected in the related plan view. See sketch SK -3. - Additional Sketches Enclosed. - Architectural Partial Wall Sections/Elevations: These sketches are the architectural elevations showing the configuration of the bracing at the East and West end of the building. Note the configuration of the braces is altered fro what appears in the original building elevations and details. See sketches SK -4 and SK -5. -Markups of the Canopy Sections from Steel shop drawings Sheet E -7L: These sketches reflect additional information that was not relayed during the review of the shop drawings. This additional information should allow completion of the shop drawings for the entry canopy areas. See sketches SK -6 and SK -7. 7/23/2007 Repoli R NF_01 Note Pads 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 GEN R JL CONTRACTORS 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 32314507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0676 Page: 13 of 29 Note PadItem No. Status Requite Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed AS120 ASLNO, 2q . ,-, - 00001 NEW Sheet A2.01T: Per the contractors request the 8/2/2007 wall between Electrical 002 and Mechanical 003 may be left out until the electrical gear is installed and all clearances are verified. This wall may be moved as required into the Mechanical room 003 to accommodate this change. Additionally door 003A may be reositioned within this wall as required. Sheet M0.11: FCU 2 is to be relocated above door 003A as required, maintain all connections and piping as shown. Expedition® Report R NP_01 11 11 11 11 -�Note Pads 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 14 of 29 Note Paciltem No, Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed ASI 21 ASI No..11. , .. . Expedition`19 00001 NEW PETRA A7 Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEPs 9/4/2007 Door Hardware Specification Section 0871013e advised of the following modifications to hardware requirements to the following doors: 1.Add Card Readers to doors 10113, 101C and 101D. These doors shall be secure from the Lobby. 2.Add Card Reader to door 101A. This door shall be secure from Stair 101 3.Add Card Reader to door 104B. This door to be secure from the exterior. 4.Add Card Reader to door 129. This door shall be secure from Receiving 129. S.Add Card Reader to door 141. This door shall be secure from Corridor 140. 6.Revise door swing at door 152 to swing into Lobby 151. Revise lockset to Storeroom function 7.Delete Card Reader from door 124. 8.Add Card Readers to doors 232A and 238A. These doors shall be secure from Waiting Area 237. 9 -Add Card Reader to door 252. This door shall be secure from Corridor 246. 10.Delete Card Reader from door 312. Revise lockset to Storeroom Function. 11.11evise lockset at door 315B to a Storeroom Function. This door shall be secure from Training 315. 12.Add Card Reader to Door 354. Door shall be secure from Lobby 304. 13.Add Card Reader to Door 307A. Door shall be secure from Corridor 305. Report R_NP 01 11 Ei 11 11 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RC&1875 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 a PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 15 of 28 Note PadItem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed ASI 2Z _N*.22 .. 00001 NEW PETRA AJ Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEP's 9/4/2007 Reflected Ceiling Plan Sheets A7.21T and A7.221 Be advised of the following modifications to following ceiling heights: 1. Revise ceiling heights at Corridors 205, 222, 246 and 262 from 10'-0" to 9'-6"and revise soffits from 9'-6" to 9'-T% Note, the 11'-0" high ceiling at these Dations shall remain as shown. 2. Revise ceiling height at Plan Vault 210 from 10'-0" to 8'-6". ASI.23 --ASI 00001 NEW Sheet A3.3 - Detail A5: Provide a 9"x8 1/2"x3/8"9/4/2007 fabricated angle with epoxy anchors at 24" o.c. for the steel lintel at the stair tower header per RFI #24. Fourth Floor Stair Construction: Provide columns and channels per RFI # 28 for the framing of Stair #4. Sheet S2.11/S2.12: Revise the floor framing to be a W21x44 at the following locations: Gridline 5.5 from D to E and Gridline 7.5 from D to E. AS124_...; ASI No. . 24 00001 NEW PETRA AJ Refer to attached civil drawings sheet C2.1. 9/21/2007 Revise Dation of new water service to connect into existing 10" water service within property line as shown in lieu of connecting into existing 12" wateriine located in Meridian Road. Note: Routing of sanitary service shall be located within the building structure per response to RFI No 22 see attached in lieu of location shown on sheet C2.1. EVeaition® Repert R_NP 01 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 16 of 29 Note PacEltem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed AS11S ASL 1 0..25 00001 NEW The electrical engineer has been in discussions 9/11/2007 with the supplier for the electrical bus -duct for the above referenced project. In there discussions, the question was raised whether the specified 208V bus -duct is required to be provided with a 200% neutral bus to match the specified 200% neutral bus for the main switchboard (MSBL). The specification for the bus -duct requires a 100% rated neutral bus. The electrical engineer has recommend that the 208V bus -duct be provided with a 200% rated neutral bus to keep the intent of the design consistent throughout the distribution system, and to minimize the effects of harmonic loads (computers, etc.) that are anticipated to be prevalent on the 208 volt distribution system in the facility. As such the electrical engineer recommends that the contractor provide the following revision in electrical work: Sheet E5.00 1. Bus -ducts `BD -LA' and BD -LB' shall be furnished and installed with 200% rated neutral bussing and the appropriate lugs necessary to accommodate the specified feeders. The electrical engineer has also reviewed the construction requirements for emergency distribution switchboard `ESB3' with the electrical gear supplier, and has found that the contract documents indicate that the feeder for `ESB3' is sized for 2,280 amps. Per the schedule on the documents, `ESB3' is rated for 400 amps. The electrical engineer dose not believe that the feeder to this switchboard needs to be sized for 2,280 amps. Therefore, in addition to the work recommended above, please direct the contractor to provide the following revisions in electrical work: Sheet E5.00 i.Feeder for `ESB3' (indicated as feeder `I' on feeder schedule) shall be 4-500 and 1-3(G)-4" in lieu of specified. Report R_NF_01 Note Pads - 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 17 of 29 Note PadItem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed AS126 ASI Nor: 26..,.:... 00001 NEW Reference: Full Tenant Improvment twith MEPs 9/18/2007 Door Hardware Specification Section 08710. Be advised of the following modifications to hardware requirments to the following doors. 1 00001 NEW 1. Add Card Readers to doors 102A. This door shall be secure from Stair 104. 2. Add Card Reader to door 110A. This door shall be secure from Stair 110. 3. Add Card Reader to door 124A. This door to be secure from Corridor 113. 4. Add Card Reader to door 102C. This door shall be secure from Stair 104. 5. Delete Card Reader from door 224. 6. Add Card Reader to door 309. This door shall be secure from Corridor 305. 7. Add Card Reader to door 3378. This door shall be secure from Corridor 337. Steve Christiansen, LCA 9/17/2007 Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEP's 9/20/2007 Hallow Metal Frames, Doors and Glazing. 1. Refer frame hallow metal frame type V. Revise the two T-9" dimension to read 2'-0". Revise the overall 11'-2" dimension to read 7'-8". Glazing in this frame shall be 1/4" wire glass. 2. Glass in frame type 'B' located at door 346B shall be 1/4" clear tempered glass. 3. Glass in frame type '13' located at doors 135A and 1358 shal be type 3 "Fire Lite Plus" 4. Glass in door 1336 shall be 1/4 wire glass. 5. Glass in door 135C shall be bype 3 "Fire Lite Plus" 6. Revise frame type for door 144A to read type 'X' in the door and frame schedule. This door and frame shall be glazed with "Fire Lite Plus". 7. Revise frame type for door 124 A to read type 'C' in the door and frame schedule. 8. Revise frame type for door 347 to read type 'N' on the floor plan. Report R NFP -01 323 -4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 !1!''Q' C/'►T TI 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 17 of 29 Note PadItem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed AS126 ASI Nor: 26..,.:... 00001 NEW Reference: Full Tenant Improvment twith MEPs 9/18/2007 Door Hardware Specification Section 08710. Be advised of the following modifications to hardware requirments to the following doors. 1 00001 NEW 1. Add Card Readers to doors 102A. This door shall be secure from Stair 104. 2. Add Card Reader to door 110A. This door shall be secure from Stair 110. 3. Add Card Reader to door 124A. This door to be secure from Corridor 113. 4. Add Card Reader to door 102C. This door shall be secure from Stair 104. 5. Delete Card Reader from door 224. 6. Add Card Reader to door 309. This door shall be secure from Corridor 305. 7. Add Card Reader to door 3378. This door shall be secure from Corridor 337. Steve Christiansen, LCA 9/17/2007 Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEP's 9/20/2007 Hallow Metal Frames, Doors and Glazing. 1. Refer frame hallow metal frame type V. Revise the two T-9" dimension to read 2'-0". Revise the overall 11'-2" dimension to read 7'-8". Glazing in this frame shall be 1/4" wire glass. 2. Glass in frame type 'B' located at door 346B shall be 1/4" clear tempered glass. 3. Glass in frame type '13' located at doors 135A and 1358 shal be type 3 "Fire Lite Plus" 4. Glass in door 1336 shall be 1/4 wire glass. 5. Glass in door 135C shall be bype 3 "Fire Lite Plus" 6. Revise frame type for door 144A to read type 'X' in the door and frame schedule. This door and frame shall be glazed with "Fire Lite Plus". 7. Revise frame type for door 124 A to read type 'C' in the door and frame schedule. 8. Revise frame type for door 347 to read type 'N' on the floor plan. Report R NFP -01 it 11 11 11 11 11 11 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 00001 NEW Sheet MAT: See attached sketches SK -1 and 9/18/2007 SK -2 for additional dimensions of millwork and walls at the City Council Chambers. ASI 28: SK1, SK2. 00001 NEW Sheet M1.11: Provide (2)*smoke dampers at 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 VAV #134 per enclosed RFI #38. Reference RFI #38. ASI' 30 N ASI oy 30 ,.. 00001 NEW Sheet AUT: Revise Folding Partition detail D5 9/25/2007 per the enclosed sketch SK -1. Verify all framing requirment with Operable Folding Partition Submittal dated September 7, 2007. 00001 NEW Full Tenant Improvement with MEPs: 10/1/2007 Dimension Clarification: Revise the following dimensions typical all sheets. Gridline G to H is 27'-8", Gridline H to ] is 18'-8". SK -1 Exped'Rion® Report R NP_01 %-.� EN b�&. Note Pads 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall -- Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 19 of 29 Note Pacittem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes opened Closed 00001 NEW PETRA A] Full Tenant Improvement with MEPs Ceiling 10/15/2007 Revisions Sheet A6.6T: Delete the upper cabinets over the refrigerator or the copy machine at the following elevations: Al, A2, A4, Bi, 65, D1, D2 and El. Sheet A6.7T: Delete the upper cabinets over the refrigerator or the copy machine at the following elevations: Al, 132, C1, C4, C5 and D2. Note: At copy machine locations, just the first (2) equal sections of cabinet are to be deleted. ASI34 ;ASI No. 34 00001 NEW Sheet AUT: At detail 62, provide a 24"x 24" 10/15/2007 opeing at each wall and trhough the insulation as shown on the enclosed sketch SK -1 to allow a return air path over the folding partition. Attachement: SK -1 ASI 15 yu rASI `No __ 00001 NEW ALLCON AB(Cold Shell and Core Package 10/29/2007 Screen Wall, Loading Dock and Ramp Area Revisions: Sheets A1.0 and A1.1: Modify the area of the loading dock, trash enclosure, ramp and screen walls per the enclosed sheets. Expedition® Report R_NF _01 Note Pads '11M AL ®IAL 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -18755 ROCK SOIX GENERA- CONTRA 00001 NEW Sheet A2.01TF: 10/17/2007 1. At Elevator Equipment Room #001: Revise the North and West ails to be Wall Type #8A, 2 hour rated walls. 2. At Elevator Equipment Room #001: Provide a wall mounted fire extinguisher (10520) inside the door to this room. Sheet A2.02TF: 1.At Elevator Equipment Room #017: Revise the North, East and West walls to be Wall Type #8A, 2 hour rated walls. 2.At Elevator Equipment Room #017: Provide a wall mounted fire extinguisher (10520) inside the door to this room. Sheet A3.OT: Revise doors 001 and 017 to be provided with a 90 minute rating. Sheet AB.OT: E4- Wall Types, Will Type #8: Add note as follows: Wall Type 8A is to be a 2 hour rated wall per U.L. U419. Provide (2) layers of 5/8" type X gypsum board each side of wall. This wall is to be constructed at all walls of the elevator equipment rooms, unless already shown to have a 2 hour wall. Sheet A9.OT: 1.Revise Detail B4 - Elevator Wall to be A4. 2.Revise Detail A4 as shown on sketch SK -1. Sheets E2.01L/E2.02L: Light fixture type WF3 in elevator pits shall be revised to Caniet no. 68 -02 -21 -OG -39. Fixture to be NEMA 4 rated vapor proof light fixture, wall mount, with 26W TRT lamp, polycarbonate globe and guard. Sheet E2.01M: 1.Furnish and install dedicated circuit for shunt trip connection to elevator disconnecting means in room 001. Circuit shall be LBA-59, #12's. Connect to shunt -trip device as required. Coordinate connection with elevator equipment supplier. 21ocate elevator disconnecting means in accordance with elevator equipment supplier and the local Authority having jurisdiction. Locations shown on plans are general and are to be coordinated for exact placement. ExpedMorP Report R NP_01 11 11 11 11 11 11 U, 11 11 Note Pads 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0676 Page: 21 of 29 Note Padltem No. Status Required (Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed 3.All wiring in elevator pit shall conform to requirements of NEMA 4 for wet Dations. Sheet E2.02M: 1.Fumish and install dedicated circuit for shunt trip connection to both elevator disconnecting means In room 017. Circuits shall be LBB -27 and LBB -29, #12's. Connect to shunt -trip device as required. Coordinate connection with elevator equipment supplier. 21ocate elevator disconnecting means in accordance with elevator equipment supplier and the local Authority having jurisdiction. Locations shown on plans are general and are to be coordinated for exact placement. 3.Receptacles in elevator pits 1 and 2 are to be GFI type receptacles. 4.AII wiring in elevator pit shall conform to requirements on NEMA 4 for wet locations. A 37 115i ! -- - 00001 NEW PETRA A] Full Tenant Improvements with MEPs. 10/17/2007 Based on discussions between Geoff Johnson and Idaho Power Co. regarding the capacity of the pad mounted transformer(s) for doubling the neutral conductor capacity from the main switchboard MSBL to the pad mounted transformer, Idaho Power has indicated that the 200% neutral conductor's requirement shown on the documents can not be met. As such, the following electrical revisions are to be made: Sheet E5.00: Feeder `P between main switchboard MSBL and Idaho Power 208V transformer to be revised to be (8) 4" C's each with 4-500 MCM in lieu of indicated. Please provide credit pricing for this revision in work. Because the system neutral is bonded to ground at the main switchboard, we do not believe that this revision will compromise the Intent of the design to provide a system to accommodate the heating effects of non-linear electrical loads on the system. EVedition® Report R NF_01 Note Pads 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET * MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 22 of 29 Note PadItem No. Status Requl Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed ASI -39 00001 NEW Be advised of the following modifications to 10/31/2007 hardware requirements to the following doors. Modify hardware as required for a secure door with access by card reader and or key only. 1.Add Card Reader to door 002 2.Add Card Reader to door 004 (One active leaf of pair of doors to room 004) 3.Add Card Reader to door 005 4.Add Card Reader to door 106 SAW Card Reader to door 108 6.Add Card Reader to door 200 7.Add Card Reader to door 202 8.Add Card Reader to door 300 9.Add Card Reader to door 302 10.Add Card Reader to door 101E 11.Add Card Reader to door 312 A9-39-- 00001 NEW Sheets A2.11T and A2.12T: Relocate WIndow 11/2/2007 Type "Q", typical of (2), at the City Council Chambers per the enclosed sketch SK -1 and SK -2. ASI.40 ASI1-No.40_ -- 00001 NEW PEM AJ Sheets A2.11T, A2.12T, A2.21T and A2. r: 11/8/2007 Relocate the roof and overflow drain piping shown at gridlines 1-F and 12-F per the enclosed Sketches SK -1, SK -2, SK -3, and SK -4. Coordinate relocation with mechanical. Attachments SK -1, SK -2, SK -3, SK -4. Expedition® Report R NP_01 \._Note Pads- � was 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 f1l�It' �f1TT1 ' 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No:- 06-0675 Page: 23 of 29 Note PadItem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed 00001 NEW PETRA A7 Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEP's 11/19/2007 ' Sheets A2.12T and P1.12: Multi Purpose 142 - Delete the sink (P-11) from South section cabinets. Sheet A2.21T: 1. Work area 212: Revise per enclosed sketch SK -1. 2. Mens Shower 225 and Womens Shower 226: Delete all plumbing fixtures and revise to be Storage Rooms 225/226 as shown on enclosed sketch DK -1. Coordinate deletion with mechanical. SheetA7.21T: 1. Work Area 212: Revise per enclosed sketch SK -2. 2. Men's Shower 225 and Women's Shower 226: Delete all plumbing fixtures and revise to be Storage Rooms 225/226 as shown on enclosed sketch SK -2. Provide lay -in acoustical ceiling as shown. SheetP2.11: Mens shower 225 and Womens Shower 226: Delete all plumbing fixtures and associated piping from these rooms. Sheet M2.11: Mens Shower 225 and Womens Shower 226: Delete all exhaust grills and associated duct work from these rooms. Sheet E2.21F: Mens Shower 225 and Womens Shower 226: Delete the Fire Alarm Homs at these two rooms. Sheet E2.21L: Mens Shower 225 and Womens Shower 226: Revise lighting at these two rooms to provide (1) GF2 type fixture at each room with normal switching. Attachements: Sketches SK -1, SK -2. Expedition® Report R NF_01 Note Pads 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO QGEk4E R AL CONTRACTORS 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 24 of 29 Note PadItem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed AS1 42 ASI No 47 „ .. 00001 NEW PETRA A] Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEP's 11/19/2007 Sheets A6.12T: Elevation C5 - Revise the millwork for Reception 354 per the enclosed sketch SK -1. Note the millwork for Reception 321 to remain as per the original drawing. ASI 4 A,9 No: 4 00001 NEW PETRA WB Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEP's 11/19/2007 Access Flooring System 10270: Color selection for the Static Conductive Plastic Laminate in Rooms 311 and 312 is Tate `Access Floor System Folkstone Graphix. ASI_44 __ADZ Ism 4+4 . _ -- 00001 NEW PETRA A] Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEP's 11/19/2007 Sheet A8.3T: Detail El, revise condoc note 06402110 (Wood veneer over MDF) to be 09260.1)(5/8" type X Gypsum Board). ASI 49 ASI Ntii. 00001 NEW PETRA A] Reference: Full Tenant Improvment with MEP's 11/19/2007 Sheet A7.21T and A7.22T: Revise the ceiling height of Unassigned Rooms 211 and 252 to be 9'4". Revise the soffits of Lobby 111 to 9'-4" above the 2nd floor. Sheet M2.11 and M2.12: Revise the duct work at F17-18 and FT -19 per the enclosed sketch SK -12 and SK -13. ASI46_.. ASI_NO 46.:. 00001 NEW Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEP's 11/19/2007 Sheet A6.6T: Elevation -D1; Revise elevation per enclosed sketch SK -1. di-® Report RNP 01 Note Pads Sheet A2.22T: Provide openings in the gypsum board at the top 12" of the wail along Gridline 9 for a return air path, net open area in wall shall be at least 13.33 sq. ft. See enclosed sketch SK -1. Sheet M2.11 and M2.12: Revise the duct work layout at the clouded areas shown on the enclosed sketch SK -14 and SK -15. Attachements: Sheet SK -1, SK -14 and SK -15. ASI 51 00001 NEW Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEP's 11/20/2007 Sheet AMT: Revise detail Di per enclosed sketch SK -1. Note this revision only occurs at the head of window type '3' along gridlines 1 and 12, between gridlines F -J. All other locations are to be per the Construction Documents. ftn® Report RNP 01 AttachementsL SK 9, SK 8, SK 7, SK 5, SK -6 ASI 49 ASI No 9 ` 00001 NEW Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEP's 11/20/2007 Sheets E2.11S, E2.12S, E2.21S, E2.22S, E2.31S and E2.32S: Revise the layout of the cable tray at each area per the enclosed drawings. AS'1' --- ;A NO— ------ -- = . ---== 00001 NEW Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEP's 11/19/2007 -- Sheet A2.22T: Provide openings in the gypsum board at the top 12" of the wail along Gridline 9 for a return air path, net open area in wall shall be at least 13.33 sq. ft. See enclosed sketch SK -1. Sheet M2.11 and M2.12: Revise the duct work layout at the clouded areas shown on the enclosed sketch SK -14 and SK -15. Attachements: Sheet SK -1, SK -14 and SK -15. ASI 51 00001 NEW Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEP's 11/20/2007 Sheet AMT: Revise detail Di per enclosed sketch SK -1. Note this revision only occurs at the head of window type '3' along gridlines 1 and 12, between gridlines F -J. All other locations are to be per the Construction Documents. ftn® Report RNP 01 Note Pads 323-4560 ' BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 flC'_K SOTTI 00001 NEW PETRA AJ Reference: Cold Shell and Core Sheet 52.41: Add W8x10 beam at the east end of the elevator penthouse at gridline 3 F. Provide additional detail reference C7/S7.5 for angle deck support between column and stair corner. See attached sketch SK -1. Sheet S2.421- Add W8x10 beams at each end of the elevator at the elevation of the primary roof. Add W8x10 beam to the west elevator shaft also. See attached sketch SK -2. Sheet S2.42: Provide additional detail reference C7/S7.5 for angle deck support between column and stair comer. See attached sketch SK -3. Sheet S7.5: Add detail C5 showing a 4x4xi/4 angle spanning between the column and the masonry wall to provide support for the roof decking. See attached sketch SK -4. Attachements: Sheets SK -1, SK -2, SK -3, SK -4 ASI' 53_._ _.:ASI Noo 51 _ ---- — – 11/26/2007 00001 NEW Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEPs 12/2/2007 Sheets M2.01, M2.02, M3.01 and M3.02: Dell ete all manual dampers shown on the inlets of all under floor VAV boxes. ExpedWori® Report R_NP 01 Note Pads 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE 208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 27 of 29 Note PadItem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Clos�l A.S.U54�:�A5I No: X54. 00001 NEW PETRA A] Reference: Cold Core and Shell Package. Sheet S2.41: Adjust the roof elevation at gridline E to be 46'-10 1/2". This information was revised in submittals. Provide reference to new detail B5/S/7.6, which shows the proposed method to adjust the top of the masonry wall to the correct elevations. See enclosed sketch SK -1. Sheet S2.42: Adjust the roof elevation at gridline E to be 46'-10 1/2". This information was revised in submittals. See enclosed sketch SK -2. Sheet S7.6: Add detail B5 showing a TS12X2X3/16 section cut to match the roof slope for the wall adjacent to gridline 3. See enclosed sketch SK -3. Sheet S 7.6: Revise detail C7 to indicate that the length of the dowels between the masonry wall and the concrete slab on deck will need to vary due to the slope of the roof. See enclosed sketch SK -4. Sheet S7.6: Revise detail C7 to indicate that the length of the dowels between ASI 55 ASI No 55 ...::` 12/3/2007 00001 NEW Reference: Community Plaza and Site 12/3/2007 Improvements: Sheet 1-1.70: Terllis Construction Details, See enclosed sketches SK -1, SK -2, SK -3, which clarify the materials and construction of this structure. Expedition® Report R NP_01 Note Pads =" —Ve M. a T fN 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO ' RCE -1875 m ROCK SOLID GENEMAY, CONTRACTORS 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 32314507 ' Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0676 Page: 28 of 29 Note PadItem No. Status Required Ball In CourtNotes Opened Closed 00001 NEW Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEPs 12/10/2007 Sheet A2.11TF: Revise wall type at Plan Vault 118 and Storage 126 to wall type 6 as detailed ' on sheet A8.OT. Sheet A2.21TF: Revise wall type at Plan Vault ' 210 to wall type 6 as detailed on sheet AUT. Sheet A2.22TF: Revise wlal type at Storage 244 ito wall type 6 as detailed on sheet AUT. Sheet M1.01: Provide (2) additional fire smoke dampers and duct work at Storage Rooms 126 and 134 (leach) per enclosed sketch SK -1. ASI 57► 00001 NEW Reference: Full Tenant Improvement with MEPs 12/10/2007 Note: This ASI is clarifying the ceiling heights of the 2nd floor Lobby, Waiting and Main Corridors. Previously issued ASI's #22 and #45 had revised some of the ceiling heights in this area, please disregard these and use the information described here. Sheets A7.21T and A7.22T: Revise ceiling heights per enclosed sketches. Sheets A2.21T and A2.22T: At doors #222A and 262 only, revise frame type "Z" to be 9'-4" tall. At door #224 only revise frame type "C" to be 9'-4" tall. Expeditiorle Report R NP_01 Note Pads Sheet E2.11P: City Council Conference 133, the power for motorized shades shall be located at the right side of each window opening, when facing the opening from inside the room (Keynote #22). Sheet E2.3213: Mayor's Suite 343 and Executive Conference 346, the power for motorized shades shall be Dated at the right side of each window opening, when facing the opening from inside the room (Keynote #15). Expedition® Report RNP 01 ' 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • Requests for Information Log Project Name: Meridian City Hall Project No: 06-0675 Date: 1/4/2008 Page: 1 of 3 TypeTo From NumberTitle Status Date Approved Responded Required RFI ' 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Project No: 06-0675 Date: 1/4/2008 Page: 1 of 3 TypeTo From NumberTitle Status Date Approved Responded Required RFI CITYMER PETRA 00001 Sample CLO 5/14/2007 5/21/2007 5/21/2007 5/21/2007 I' RFI LOMARC PETRA 00002 Project Director CLO 3/12/2007 3/19/2007 3/19/2007 3/19/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00003 Water / Sewer for Plaza CLO 4/18/2007 4/18/2007 4/18/2007 4/25/2007 tRFI LOMARC PETRA 00004 Change Detail C2 - S 5.2 CLO 4/20/2007 5/3/2007 5/3/2007 4/27/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00005 Base Plate Change CLO 4/30/2007 5/3/2007 5/3/2007 5/7/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00006 Embed Plate P-1, P-2 CLO 4/30/2007 5/3/2007 5/3/2007 5/7/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00007 Rule Steel RFI No 2 CLO 5/1/2007 6/13/2007 6/13/2007 5/8/2007 LOMARC PETRA 00008 Rule Steel RFI No 3 CLO 5/1/2007 5/21/2007 5/21/2007 5/8/2007 'RFI RFI LOMARC PETRA 00009 Wall & Footing height CLO 5/8/2007 6/26/2007 6/26/2007 5/15/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00010 Foundation Drain at Basement CLO 5/16/2007 6/26/2007 6/26/2007 5/23/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00011 ASI Requests -Elevations and Details CLO 5/16/2007 6/26/2007 6/26/2007 5/25/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00012 Rule Steel RFI No. 4 CLO 5/24/2007 6/26/2007 6/26/2007 5/31/2007 ' RFI LOMARC PETRA 00013 Rule Steel RFI No. 5 CLO 5/30/2007 6/26/2007 6/26/2007 6/6/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00014 Rule Steel RFI No. 6 CLO 5/30/2007 6/5/2007 6/5/2007 6/6/2007 ' RFI LOMARC PETRA 00015 Top steel elevation@Detail(RS-7) CLO 6/11/2007 6/12/2007 6/12/2007 6/18/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00016 Beam Verification (RS -8) CLO 6/14/2007 6/26/2007 6/26/2007 6/21/2007 ' RFI LOMARC PETRA 00017 Domestic Water Source CLO 6/18/2007 6/20/2007 6/20/2007 6/20/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00018 Wall Fix at Grid "D" CLO 7/5/2007 7/3/2007 7/3/2007 7/12/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00019 Arched Chord Joist Connecdon(RS-9) CLO 7/5/2007 7/6/2007 7/6/2007 7/12/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00020 Foundation Drain Colec tion Manhole CLO 7/11/2007 7/5/2007 7/5/2007 7/18/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00021 Baric Filling Basement Walls CLO 7/19/2007 7/19/2007 7/19/2007 7/26/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00022 Sewer Modification Request CLO 7/23/2007 8/1/2007 8/1/2007 7/30/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00023 Masonry Mortar Color Clarification CLO 7/25/2007 7/27/2007 7/27/2007 8/1/2007 RFT LOMARC PETRA 00024 Steel Lintel at Stair Tower Header CLO 7/31/2007 8/2/2007 8/2/2007 8/7/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00025 AC Bolt Correction CLO 7/31/2007 8/2/2007 8/2/2007 8/7/2007 ' RFI LOMARC PETRA 00026 Moment Frame Shear Tab Weld CLO 7/31/2007 8/2/2007 8/2/2007 8/7/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00027 Sewage Ejector Tank CLO 8/6/2007 9/3/2007 9/3/2007 8/13/2007 ' RFI LOMARC PETRA 00028 4th Floor Stair Assembly CLO 8/8/2007 8/14/2007 8/14/2007 8/15/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00029 Wall at Grid H - 4, 9 CLO 8/24/2007 9/18/2007 9/18/2007 8/31/2007 ' RFI LOMARC PETRA 00030 Water to fixture P-18 CLO 8/29/2007 9/5/2007 9/5/2007 9/5/2007 Ev-won® Report R RC 01 RFI Requests for Information Log ' 11 K ad .& %n 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 3234500 • 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO ' RCE -1875 ' 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 3234500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Project No: 06-0675 Date: 1/4/2008 Page: 2 of 3 TypeTo From Numberiitie Status Date Approved Responded Required RFI LOMARC PETRA 00031 Vent for Ejector Pump CLO 8/29/2007 9/6/2007 9/6/2007 9/5/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00032 Basement Toilet Rooms CLO 8/29/2007 9/6/2007 9/6/2007 9/5/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00033 Floor Sink Near Grid 5-F CLO 8/29/2007 9/6/2007 9/6/2007 9/5/2007 'RFI LOMARC PETRA 00034 Sink Near Grid 10-E CLO 8/29/2007 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/5/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00035 Sink Near Grid 10-8 CLO 8/29/2007 9/4/2007 9/4/2007 9/5/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00036 Plumbing Drawing for 4th Floor CLO 8/29/2007 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/5/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00037 Switch Board MDS Feeders CLO 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/10/2007 9/12/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00038 VAV at Room 134 CLO 9/11/2007 9/14/2007 9/14/2007 9/18/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00039 Interconnection of Fire Stand Pipes CLO 9/11/2007 9/11/2007 9/11/2007 9/18/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00040 RWD 10-D CLO 9/12/2007 9/13/2007 9/13/2007 9/19/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00041 Misc. Plumbing Questions P2.12 CLO 9/12/2007 9/13/2007 9/13/2007 9/19/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00042 Shear Tab Correction CLO 9/18/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 9/25/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00043 Radius SOG at Zed Floor CLO 9/24/2007 10/9/2007 10/9/2007 10/1/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00044 Smoke Dampers CLO 9/27/2007 9/28/2007 9/28/2007 10/4/2007 ' RFI LOMARC PETRA 00045 Operable Wall Partition-Submittial CLO 9/27/2007 11/14/2007 11/14/2007 10/4/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00046 HWS & HWS At Basement CLO 10/2/2007 10/2/2007 10/2/2007 10/9/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00047 W8x10 at North Cold Air Return CLO 10/2/2007 10/5/2007 10/5/2007 10/9/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA - 00048 Clean Agent Releasing Panel CLO 10/3/2007 10/16/2007 10/16/2007 10/10/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00049 Pre -Action Sequence of Operations CLO 10/3/2007 10/16/2007 10/16/2007 10/10/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00050 Elevator Shaft Fire Alarm Question CLO 10/4/2007 10/16/2007 10/16/2007 10/11/2007 LOMARC PETRA 00051 Beam Web to Column Flange Weld CLO 10/4/2007 10/5/2007 10/5/2007 10/11/2007 'RFI RFI LOMARC PETRA 00052 Electrcal Drawings TI and Plaza CLO 10/18/2007 10/25/2007 10/25/2007 10/25/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00053 Sprinkler Pipe Hangers CLO 10%22/2007 10/29/2007 10/29/2007 10/29/2007 ' RFI LOMARC PETRA 00054 Fire Suppression Flow Meter CLO 10/22/2007 10/25/2007 10/25/2007 10/29/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00055 RDL & OFL CLO 10/29/2007 11/1/2007 11/1/2007 11/5/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00056 ASI 32 Ceiling Tike Clarification CLO 10/30/2007 10/30/2006 10/30/2006 11/6/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00057 Entry Vestibule Fre Suppression CLO 10/31/2007 11/7/2007 11/7/2007 11/7/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00058 Fire Riser Room Issues CLO 10/31/2007 11/6/2007 11/6/2007 11/7/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00059 Supply & Return 1 -Hr Rated Assembly CLO 11/2/2007 11/14/2007 11/14/2007 11/9/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00060 Under Floor Conflicts CLO 11/2/2007 11/19/2007 11/19/2007 11/9/2007 EnxxW Report RRC 01 RFI Report R RC 01 RFI 'RW Requests for Information Log FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Project No: 06-0676 Date: Page: IIID �•���• � III II From NumberTitle Status Date Approved Report R RC 01 RFI 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 * PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Project No: 06-0676 Date: Page: 1/4/2008 3 of 3 TypeTo From NumberTitle Status Date Approved Responded Required RFI LOMARC FETRA 00061 Access to Flre Smoke Dampers CLO 11/2/2007 11/19/2007 11/19/2007 11/9/2007 ' RFI LOMARC PETRA 00062 Data Drops CLO 11/9/2007 11/20/2007 11/20/2007 11/16/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00063 Electrical through Concrete Wall CLO 11/27/2007 12/3/2007 12/3/2007 12/4/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00064 Sed Floor Sink at Grid 5/E CLO 11/27/2007 11/27/2007 11/27/2007 12/4/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00065 Diminution Verification CLO 11/28/2007 11/29/2007 11/29/2007 12/5/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00066 Fire Alarm Questions OPN 12/4/2007 12/11/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00067 Security Camera Height CLO 12/12/2007 12/14/2007 12/14/2007 12/19/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00068 Ceiling at Rm 111, 112. CLO 12/12/2007 12/14/2007 12/14/2007 12/19/2007 RFI _ LOMARC_ PETRA 00069 2ed Floor Duct Conflicts CLO 12/14/2007 12/14/2007 12/14/2007 12/21/2007 LOMARC PETRA 00070 Return Duct at RM 142 CLO 12/14/2007 12/14/2007 12/14/2007 12/21/2007 'RFI RFI LOMARC PETRA 00071 Gas Meter / Condensing Units CLO 12/14/2007 12/17/2007 12/17/2007 12/21/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00072 Lower Entry Canopy Attachment CLO 12/18/2007 12/18/2007 12/18/2007 12/25/2007 1 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00073 Sun Screen Top Attachment OPN 12/21/2007 12/28/2007 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00074 Exterior Wall Types OPN 12/26/2007 1/2/2008 RFI LOMARC PETRA 00075 Fire Alarm Questions NEW 1/4/2008 1/11/2008 RFI _ LOMARC PETRA 00076 Brick Type A2 NEW 1/4/2008 1/11/2008 Report R RC 01 RFI Submittal Loq j! y\ by Package 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO -DIV 03- 03-100 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project.Narne: 4/30/2007 4/30/2007 Meridian City Hall 5/1/2007 03-100-02 Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0676 5/8/2007 5/8/2007 5/14/2007 5/16/2007 Page: 1 of 6 001 Concrete Mix Designs APP Required 5/11/2007 Latest Dates —_ _ Package Submittal Rev. Title Status Start Finish Rcvd. Sent Return Forward BIC DIVA42:._ ffiitevaric 002 Upper Footings - Rebar Shops AAN 7/9/2007 7/9/2007 02-222 029 Structural Excavation and AAN 5/10/2007 5/11/2007 5/18/2007 5/27/2007 5/17/2007 5/17/2007 Baclill 001 Vapor Block APP 4/30/2007 02-222-01 001 Drain Rack APP 7/27/2007 7/30/2007 9/6/2007 9/7/2007 02-222-02 001 1500 Gal Sand and Grease APP 7/27/2007 7/30/2007 9/6/27 9/7/2007 APP 4/30/2007 Intercepto 5/17/2007 5/17/2007 5/17/2007 02-222-03 001 Manhole Ring APP 7/27/2007 7/30/2007 9/6/2007 917/2007 02-222-04 001 Tapping Valves, 6" APP 7/27/2007 7/30/2007 9/6/2007 917/2007 -DIV 03- 03-100 011 Footings and Foundations AAN 4/30/2007 4/30/2007 5/1/2007 5/1/2007 03-100-02 002 Concrete Mix Designs AAN 5/8/2007 5/8/2007 5/14/2007 5/16/2007 03-100-03 001 Concrete Mix Designs APP 5/10/2007 5/11/2007 5131/2007 5/31/2007 03-100-06 001 First Floor Deck Rebar Shops AAN 7!24/2007 7/27/2007 8/6/2007 8/8/2007 03-100-3 002 Upper Footings - Rebar Shops AAN 7/9/2007 7/9/2007 7/23/2007 7/23/2007 03300-01 001 PVC Waterstop APP 4/30/2007 4/30/2007 5/17/2007 5/17/2007 03300-02 001 Vapor Block APP 4/30/2007 4/30/2007 5/17/2007 5/17/2007 03300-03 001 Concrete Accessories -Epoxy APP 4/30/2007 4/30/2007 5/17/2007 5/17/2007 03300-04 001 Concrete Accessories -Form APP 4/30/2007 4/30/2007 5/17/2007 5/17/2007 5/17/2007 Oil No.1 03300-05 001 Concrete Accessories -Curing APP 4/30/2007 4/30/2007 5/17/2007 5/17/2007 6/14/2007 05-400-01 Compoun Cold Formed Metal Framing AAN 6/14/2007 6/14/2007 7/11/2007 03300-06 001 Silicate Hardener and Sealer APP 9/6/2007 9/6/2007 9/14/2007 9/14/2007 5/17/2007 05-500-03 001 Stair #1 Plans APP 6/11/2007 6/12/2007 7/9/2007 04-000-01 001 Masonry Accessories APP 6/14/2007 6/18/2007 7/3/2007 7/3/2007 04200-01 001 Grout Mix Design APP 6/14/2007 6/18/2007 7/11/2007 7/11/2007 04200-02 001 Concrete Masonry Units APP 6/14/2007 6/18/2007 7/10/2007 7/11/2007 04200-03 001 Mortar Mix Design Type S APP 6/14/2007 6/18/2007 7/10/2007 7/11/2007 04200-04 001 Mortar Mix Design Type N APP 6/14/2007 6/18/2007 7/10/2007 7/11/2007 04200-05 001 Mutual Brick Specifications APP 7/10/2007 7/13/2007 8/9/2007 8/9/2007 04200-06 001 Aniscraft Stone Submfitial APP 7/16/2007 7/18/2007 7/23/2007 7/23/2007 04200-07 001 Mortar Mix Colorchart NEW 7/25/2007 7/25/2007 LOMARC 04-810-01 001 Veneer Masonry Anchors APP 12/13/2007 12/13/2007 12/14/2007 12/17/2007 Expedition® Report RSB 02 05500-02 005 Structural Steel Shops AAN 5/23/2007 5/29/2007 6/17/2007 6/13/2007 (Phasel) 05500-04 001 Revised Sheets from Phase 1 APP 6/14/2007 6/14/2007 7/6/2007 7/6/2007 Set 054000-01 001 Weld Procedure Specifications APP 6/14/2007 6/20/2007 7/9/2007 7/10/2007 05-000-02 001 Welding Procedures and AAN 7/10/2007 7/12/2007 8/6/2007 8/8/2007 Specs -Field 05-300-01 001 Metal Deck- Shop Drawings APP 5x//2007 5/9/2007 5/16/2007 5/17/2007 No.1 05-300-02 002 J1, J2 Joists and Decking APP 5/23/2007 5/29/2007 6/14/2007 6/14/2007 05-400-01 001 Cold Formed Metal Framing AAN 6/14/2007 6/14/2007 7/11/2007 7/12/2007 05 -SM 001 Anchor Bolt Plan MCN 4/27/2007 4/30/2007 5/16/2007 5/17/2007 05-500-03 001 Stair #1 Plans APP 6/11/2007 6/12/2007 7/9/2007 7/10/2007 Expedition® Report RSB 02 Submittal Log by Package ' 323-4500 sOTSIE, UDAaO RCE -11c8755 m ROCK JOLM GENE R wz COWRACMRS 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 2 of 5 Required Latest Dates - Package Submittal Rev. Title Status Start Finish Rcvd. Sent Retum Forward BIC ' 05-500-04 001 Structural Steel Shop (Phase II) AAN 6/11/2007 6/12/2007 7/11/2007 7/13/2007 054100-05 001 Stair #2 Plans AAN 6/14/2007 6/14/2007 7/9/2007 7/10/2007 05500-08 001 Shap Drawings - Bent Plate AAN 7/13/2007 7/18/2007 8/6/2007 8/8/2007 05500-07 001 Revised lst,2nd,3rd,4th, APP 8/29/2007 8/30/2007 9/27/2007 10/1/2007 Framing 05500-08 001 Sunscreens and Chiller Frame AAN 9/412007 9/4/2007 9/27/2007 10/1/2007 Shops 05500-09 006 EL -Beams and Canopys MCNR 10/2/2007 10/3/2007 LOMARC .05500-10 006 EL -Beams and Canopys AAN 11/2/2007 11/15/2007 11/26/2007 11/26/2007 Resubmit 05521-01 001 Council Chambers Steel NEW 12/11/2007 12/13/2007 LOMARC Shops Df V. 016_: - ----- -- 06-402-01 001 Interior Architectural AAN 10/26/2007 10/30/2007 12/3/2007 12/3/2007 Woodwork DLV 07 — - - -------ChgmldlandyloisfureRyirteafiort.:: ._ . :.: .... , : ....... .: ........ 07210-01 001 Rigid Foam APP 4/30/2007 4/30/2007 5/17/2007 5/17/2007 Insulation -Foundation ' 07-210-01 001 Building Insulation APP 6/14/2007 6/14/2007 7/11/2007 7/12/2007 07-210-02 001 Foil Faced Fiberboard APP 8/15/2007 8/21/2007 9/14/2007 9/14/2007 insulation 07-500-01 003 Roofing NEW 12/3/2007 12/3/2007 LOMARC 07-900 001 Joint Sealants AAN 5/8/2007 5/9/2007 5/15/2007 5/21/2007 IV08 DIVAS-- 08-211-01 08-211-01 001 Wood Doors AAN af8/2007 8/9/2007 9/6/2007 9/6/2007 08-211-02 001 Wood Door Cut Sheets MCNR 8/8/2007 8/9/2007 9/6/2007 9/6/2007 ABS 08-211-03 001 Door Sample for Color and NEW 12/27/2007 12/27/2007 LOMARC Finish 08-334-01 001 Overhead Coiling Grilles AAN 10/10/2007 10/10/2007 11/1/2007 11/8/2007 08-411-01 002 Aluminum Entrances and AAN 6/28/2007 6/28/2007 7/11/2007 7/13/2007 StorefrontS 08-830-01 001 Metal Framed Skylights APP 6/25/2007 6/28/2007 7/11/2007 7/13/2007 08-711-01 001 Finish Hardware Schedule MCN 8/8/2007 8/9/2007 9/6/2007 9/6/2007 08-800-01 001 Glazing AAN 6/25/2007 6/28/2007 7/11/2007 7/13/2007 08-800-02 001 Glazing Shop Drawings AAN 8/27/2007 9/4/2007 9/14/2007 9/14/2007 ' D1V:00; - 09-260-01 001 Gypsum Board Assemblies APP 6/14/2007 6/14/2007 7/11/2007 7/12/2007 09-562-01 001 Sheet Vinyl APP 10/29/2007 10/30/2007 11/16/2007 11/16/2007 ' 09-574-01 001 Unear Metal Ceilings APP 6/14/2007 6/14/2007 7/11/2007 7/12/2007 09-651-01 001 Resilient Floor Tile APP 10/29/2007 10/30/2007 11/16/2007 11/16/2007 09-653-01 001 Rubber Base APP 10/29/2007 10/30/2007 11/16/2007 11/16/2007 09-680-01 001 Carpet APP 10/29/2007 10/30/2007 11/16/2007 11/16/2007 ' 09-720-01 004 Textile Wallcovering APP 8/8/2007 8/9/2007 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 09-900-01 002 Paint APP 9/27/2007 9/27/2007 10/10/2007 10/15/2007 Expedition® Report RSB 02 Submittal Log by Package 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE -1875 DIV 112 l 1n]itshMgs — 12-484-01 001 Walk Off Mats APP 10/29/2007 10/30/2007 11/16/2007 11/16/2007 14-000-01 002 ElevatorSubmittfals AAN 5/3/2007 517/2007 7/31/2007 5/31/2007 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Dail 15-061-01 001 Fire Piping Hangars Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 10/30/2007 15-075-01 001 Mechanical Identification APP Page: 3 of 5 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 15-082-01 Required _ _ Latest Dates 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 Package Submittal Rev. Title Statim Start Finish Rcvd. Sent Retum Forward BIC 15-185-01 001 Hydronic Pumps AAN 9/14/2007 9/14/2007 10/12/2007 10/15/2007 15-185-02 10-100-01 001 Visual Display Surfaces APP 10/4/2007 10/4/2007 11/5/2007 11/8/2007 001 10-155-01 001 Toilet Partitions OPN 10/4/2007 10/4/2007 15-185-04 001 LOMARC 10-265-01 001 Comer Guards NEVA 10/10/2007 10/10/2007 001 Air Separator LOMARC 10-270-01 002 Access Flooring APP 10/3/2007 10/3/2007 11/6/2007 11/8/2007 9!7/2007 10-505-01 001 Lockers AAN 10/4/2007 10/4/2007 11/5/2007 11/8/2007 917/2007 10-520-01 001 Fire Extinguisher and Cabinet NEW 10/41=7 10/4/2007 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 LOMARC 10-605-01 001 Wire Mesh Partitons AAN 10/4/2007 10/4/2007 10/31/2007 11/8/2007 9/26/2007 10-651-01 001 Operable Panel Partitions AAN 9/11/2007 9/14/2007 9/27/2007 9/27/2007 9/26/2007 10-801-01 001 Toilet Room Acxesories AAN 10/4/2007 10/4/2007 11/8/2007 11/8/2007 15-185-14 10-900-01 001 Television Wall Mounts APP 10/4/2007 10/4/2007 11/5/2007 11/8/2007 001 10-900-02 001 Knox Box APP 10/4/2007 10/4/2007 11/5/2007 11/8/2007 Reduced Pressure Backflow DIV 112 l 1n]itshMgs — 12-484-01 001 Walk Off Mats APP 10/29/2007 10/30/2007 11/16/2007 11/16/2007 14-000-01 002 ElevatorSubmittfals AAN 5/3/2007 517/2007 7/31/2007 5/31/2007 Expedition® Report R_SB_02 15-061-01 001 Fire Piping Hangars AAN 10/9/2007 10/10/2007 10/30/2007 10/30/2007 15-075-01 001 Mechanical Identification APP 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 15-082-01 003 Pipe Insulation APP 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15483-01 001 Mechanical Insulation APP 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 15-185-01 001 Hydronic Pumps AAN 9/14/2007 9/14/2007 10/12/2007 10/15/2007 15-185-02 001 Hydronic Pumps 1,2,3,4,5 APP 9x//2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-185-03 001 Suction Diffuser APP 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/28/2007 9/26/2007 15-185-04 001 Pressurized Expansion Tanks APP 9/7/2007 9!712007 9/28/2007 9/26/2007 15-185-05 001 Air Separator APP 9/7/2007 9!7/2007 9/26/2007 9/28/2007 15-185-M 001 Air Vent APP 9!7/2007 9!7/2007 9/26/2007 9/28/2007 15-185-07 001 Flexible Connectors APP 9/7/2007 917/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-185-08 001 Thermometers APP 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-185-10 001 Pressure Gauges APP 8!7/2007 9!7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-185-12 001 Circuit Setters APP 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-185-13 001 Read Out fit APP 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-185-14 001 Safety Relief Valves APP 91//2007 9!7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-185-15 001 Reducing Valves APP 917/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/28/2007 15-185-16 001 Reduced Pressure Backflow APP 917/2007 9!7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 Preventer 15-185-17 001 Chem By -Pass Feeder APP 917/2007 917/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-185-18 001 Test Plugs APP 917/2007 917/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-185-19 001 Chemical Feeder Package APP 917/2007 917/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-320-01 001 Fire Bell AAN 10/9/2007 10/10/2007 10/30/2007 10/30/2007 15-325-01 001 Fire Sprinkler Heads AAN 10/9/2007 10/10/2007 10/30/2007 10/30/2007 15-325-02 001 Riser Manifold AAN 10/9/2007 10/10/2007 10/30/2007 10/30/2007 15-325-03 001 Fire Pre -Action Valve AAN 10/9/2007 10/10/2007 10/30/2007 10/30/2007 Expedition® Report R_SB_02 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 Page: 4 of 5 Required Latest Dates Package Submtttai Rev. Title Status Start Finish Rcvd. Sent Return Forward BIC Div.al = :, Oiler tiriiair at 15-325-04 001 Fire Backflow Preventor AAN 10/9/2007 10/10/2007 10/30/2007 10/30/2007 15-325-05 001 Groove F'dtings AAN 10/9/2007 10/10/2007 10/30/2007 10/30/2007 15-325-06 001 FDC,Hose Valve, Pump Test AAN 10/9/2007 10/10/2007 10/30/2007 10/30/2007 Connector 15-325-07 001 Check Valve AAN 10/9/2007 10/10/2007 10/30/2007 10/30/2007 15-325-08 001 Basment and 1st Piping Shops NEW 10/29/2007 10/31/2007 LOMARC 15325-09 001 Piping Plans Basement and NEW 11/26/2007 11/30/2007 LOMARC 1st Floor 15-325-10 001 Hydrolic Calculations NEW 11/26/2007 11/30/2007 LOMARC 15-328-01 001 Fire Pump AAN 10/10/2007 10/10/2007 10/30/2007 10/30/2007 15-400-01 001 Sewage Ejector System AAN 7/30/2007 7/30/2007 8/9/2007 8/9/2007 15-400-02 002 P-1 Water Closet APP 11/1/2007 11/6/2007 11/16/2007 11/16/2007 15-400-03 002 P-2 Water Closet ADA APP 11/6/2007 11/6/2007 11/16/2007 11/16/2007 15400-04 002 P-3 Urinal APP 11/6/2007 11/6/2007 11/16/2007 11/16/2007 15-400-05 001 P-4 Lavatory (ADA) (1) AAN 9!7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15400-06 001 P5 Lavatory (ADA) (2) AAN 9!7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-400-07 001 P-6 Floor Drain AAN 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 16400-08 001 P-7 Shower Stall ADA AAN 9!7/2007 9!7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15400-09 001 P3 Shower Stall AAN 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-400-10 001 P-9 Janitor Sink APP 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/28/2007 15-400-11 001 P-10 Floor Sink AAN 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-400-12 001 P-11 Sink AAN 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15400-13 001 P-12 Floor Sink (2) AAN 9/7/2007 917/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-400-14 001 P-15 Water Heater APP 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-400-15 001 P-16 Thermostatic Mbdng APP 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 Valve 15400-16 001 P-17 Water Heater (2) AAN 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15.400-17 001 P-18 Water Cooler APP 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 11/16/2007 11/16/2007 15-400-18 001 P-19 Eyewash AAN 9/7/2007 9(112007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15400-19 001 P-20 Breakroom Sink AAN 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15400-20 001 DC - Downspout Covers APP 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-400-21 001 RD - Roof Drain AAN 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15.400-22 001 OFD - Overflow Drain AAN 9/7/2007 9/7/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15400-23 001 Hose Bibb APP 11/6/2007 11/6/2007 11/16/2007 11/16/2007 15-513-01 001 Condensing Boilers AAN 9/7/2007 9R/2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 15-626-01 002 Rotary Screw Water Chillers APP 11/1/2007 11/7/2007 11/16/2007 11/16/2007 15-725-01 001 Modular Indoor Cetral Air Unit APP 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 15-725-02 001 Modular Indoor Cetral Air Unit APP 8/29/2007 9/10/2007 11/16/2007 11/16/2007 15-734-01 001 Computer Room Air AAN 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 Conditioning Unit 15-738-01 001 Split System Air Conditioning AAN 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 Units 15-762-01 001 Unit Heaters AAN 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 15-765-01 001 Access Floor Terminal Units APP 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 15-815-01 001 Metal Dud APP 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 ExpedtfionQ' — — Report R_S13_02 Submittal Log ETR by Package 323-4500 BOISE IDAHO RCE -1875 OCK SOLD GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 Project Name: Meridian City Mall Date: 1/8/2008 Project No: 06-0675 MSB Submiltials APP 7/20/2007 7/23/2007 8/16/2007 8/16/2007 Page: 5 of 5 Conduit APP 10/1/2007 Required 12/4/2007 Latest Dates _ Cable Tray Package Submittal Rev. TWO Status Start Finish Rcvd. Sent Return Forward BIC 10/3/2007 10/3/2007 12/4/2007 1215/2007 16-125-01 001 Modular floor Systems AAN 10/3/2007 15-820-01 001 Duct Accessories AAN 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25=7 9/25/2007 10/3/2007 15-838-01 001 Power Venilator AAN 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25/2007 9/26/2007 19/4/2007 15855-01 001 Dftsers, Registers, Grilles AAN 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 19/5/2007 15855-02 001 York Grilles Color Charts NEW 12/11/2007 12/13/2007 10/3/2007 12/4/2007 LOMARC 15900-01 001 CoMroler and Panel Device AAN 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 16-470-01 001 Panel Boards Data 10/3/2007 10/3/2007 12/4/2007 12/5/2007 16-510-01 001 15900-02 001 Field Device Data AAN 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 Generator Set 15900-03 001 Control Valve Schedule Data APP 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 AAN 15900-04 001 Circuit Sensors APP 9/7/2007 9f//2007 9/26/2007 9/26/2007 10/3/2007 15950-01 001 Test and Ballance Qualification APP 9/5/2007 9/10/2007 9/25/2007 9/25/2007 Expedition® Report R_SE 02 16-000-01 001 MSB Submiltials APP 7/20/2007 7/23/2007 8/16/2007 8/16/2007 16-111-01 001 Conduit APP 10/1/2007 10/3/2007 12/4/2007 12/5/2007 -16-114-01 001 Cable Tray APP 10/3/2007 10/3/2007 11/5/2007 11/5/2007 16-120-01 001 Wires and Cables APP 10/3/2007 10/3/2007 12/4/2007 1215/2007 16-125-01 001 Modular floor Systems AAN 10/3/2007 10/3/2007 11/5/2007 11/5/2007 16-130-01 001 Boxes AAN 10/3/2007 10/3/2007 12/4/2007 12/5/2007 16-141-01 001 Wiring Devices APP 10/3/2007 10/3/2007 19/4/2007 12/5/2007 16-149-01 001 Low Voltage Switching APP 10/3/2007 10/32007 12/4/2007 19/5/2007 16-425-01 001 Switchboards AAN 10/3/2007 10/3/2007 12/4/2007 12/5/2007 16-465-01 001 Bus Dud AAN 10/3/2007 10/3/2007 12/4/2007 1215/2007 16-470-01 001 Panel Boards MCN 10/3/2007 10/3/2007 12/4/2007 12/5/2007 16-510-01 001 Lighting Fixtures AAN 10/3/2007 10/3/2007 12/4/2007 12/5/2007 16.822-01 001 Generator Set AAN 10/3/2007 1013!2007 1214/2007 1215!2007 16-721-01 001 Fire Alarm AAN 10/3/2007 10/3/2007 12/4/2007 1215/2007 16-721-02 001 Fire Alarm System Drawings MCNR 10/3/2007 10/3/2007 12/12/2007 12/13/2007 SIMGRI Expedition® Report R_SE 02 January 11, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT L' January 15, 2008 ITEM NO. 19 3'B REQUEST Downtown Development AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. 0 0 LL CL 0 0 0 0 L a) LL rLn V 11 U) N E Q • Glenn K. Bennett, P.L.S. President Timothy A Burgess, P.E. Vice President Len Grady, PE City of Meridian 600 E. Watertower, Suite 200 Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Downtown Sewer Study Dear Len, Civil Survey Consultants, Inc. 1400 East Watertower Stmt Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642-7786 (208)B884312 Fax 888-0323 December 17, 2007 I have completed my initial evaluation of Meridian's existing sanitary sewer collection system to determine if additional capacity is available for redevelopment of the downtown area. First, I must qualify what I am about to report by the fact that my evaluation was localized and does not consider global impacts by development throughout Meridian. Any development outside the downtown core area will impact overall sewer system capacity and may reduce capacity available for downtown redevelopment. Excluding outside influences, my initial evaluation indicates that the existing sewer trunk lines and main collector lines serving the downtown area can accommodate additional sewage flows typically generated by redevelopment of the downtown area. An exception would be high density multi -story residential development, or commercial development that would develop very high flows. My evaluation is based upon the computer model that you developed using EPA SWMM software. This model predicted an average flow of 8.62 cfs, and peak flow of 14.29 cfs at the treatment plant based upon the inflows and time pattern developed on October 01, 2006. My evaluation is also based upon a peaking factor of 2.7 for peak hour vs. average daily flows and 240 gallons per day generated by an Equivalent Single Family Connection (ESFC). Available pipe capacity is based upon full flow conditions during a peak hour event. The model results have been checked at one location on Broadway Avenue by in -pipe flow monitoring conducted by city staff during the period of September 22, 2007 through October 24, 2007. All of the wastewater generated in the downtown area is carried to the treatment plant by the trunk line along Five Mile Creek. There are three main drainage basins that serve the downtown area via three collector mains. Figure 1 identifies each of these main drainage basins as Area 1, Area 2 and Area 3. Area 1, which is served by a 12 -inch collector main located in Cherry Lane between NW 81h Street and Meridian Road, includes approximately 158 gross acres. The controlling segment of this collector line has capacity to serve 1,270 connections of which 170 are used leaving additional capacity to serve 1,100 connections. Grady December 17, 2007 Page 2 of 3 Area 2, which is served by an 18 -inch collector main that begins at the intersection of Cherry Lane and Broadway, runs south to Broadway, then east in Broadway to Meridian Road, and includes approximately 484 gross acres. The controlling segment of this collector line has capacity to serve 2,880 connections of which 560 are used leaving additional capacity to serve 2,320 connections. Area 3 includes in excess of 800 acres, a majority of which are east and south of the downtown area. I estimate that there are only approximately 90 acres that could be considered as potential downtown area Area 3 is served by a 21 -inch collector main that begins at Five Mile Creek behind Albertson's, runs south to Cherry Lane, then east in Cherry Lane until it hits Five Mile Creek again. The controlling segment of this collector line has capacity to serve 6,800 connections of which 2,200 are used leaving additional capacity to serve 4,600 connections. The collector mains serving Areas 1, 2 and 3 all eventually discharge to the Five Mile Creek trunk line in NW 8" Street near the Water Department building. The controlling section of the trunk line, which is located on Ustick Road between Linder Road and Ten Mile Road, has capacity to serve 7,870 connections, of which 5,400 are used leaving additional capacity to serve 2,400 connections. I also looked at sub -basins within each of the three service areas. Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the approximate boundary of each sub -basin within each main service area, the gross area of each sub - basin, and the peak flow predicted by the model. Each of these sub -basins is served by an 8 -inch diameter minimum pipe, which is typically capable of handling 0.77 cfs peak flow. As you can see by the tables on each figure currently predicted flows from all of the sub -basins serving the downtown area are well below the full flow capacity of an 8 -inch pipe. Based upon the capacity numbers presented above and as shown on Figures 1-4, I believe that the three main collector lines serving the downtown area have capacity the handle residential and commercial redevelopment typically occurring as part of downtown redevelopment. The only exception would be high density multi -story residential development, or commercial development that would develop very high flows. There will be some local lines within the downtown area that need to be evaluated as specific development plans are submitted for approval. Figure 5 shows the area that you have identified as the first phase of downtown redevelopment This area includes approximately 51 gross acres that currently produce wastewater flows equivalent to 40 Equivalent Single Family Connections (ESFC's). Excluding roadway right-of-way and city property there are approximately 27 of land that could be redeveloped. I assumed that this area would be developed using the concept for the Old Town Zone provided by planning and zoning based upon 501/6 residential at 12 ESFC's per acre, and 50% commercial using 27 ESFC's per acre, resulting in wastewater flow equivalent to 531 additional ESFC's. The collector line in Broadway, which serves this area, has capacity to serve 2,320 additional connections. As you can see from this example, the predicted Phase 1 redevelopment would utilize 23% the available capacity in the collector line serving Area 2 and 22% of the available capacity in the 5 -Mile Trunk Line, emphasizing the need to consider the impact of all redevelopment and new development as it relates to available sewer system capacity. 9 0 Grady December 17, 2007 Page 3 of 3 As previous stated, my evaluation is based upon the existing sewer system model and the inflows and time pattern developed on October 01, 2006. The results of the model have been compared to actual in - pipe flow monitoring at one location in Broadway Avenue during the period of September 22, 2007 through October 24, 2007. I recommend that you conduct additional in -pipe flow monitoring in the collector lines serving each of the drainage basins as a further check on the model predictions. Thank you for the opportunity to assist.with evaluation of the existing sewer collection system. Sincerely, CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, INC. e---- 0 S49W, Tim Burgess, PE Vice President Figure 1 - Sewer Collector Line Service Area City of Meridian Downtown Redevelopment kiERRY ( 9 ko , , - ARBA_ - - _ = _ __ _- -.. . — — r—c. t S i �,�._ 'mom. A _ ,t( t 1' m►' jr"' — e= — —— — r ly I—i— _ bt t COLLECTOR LINE CAPACITY AS - .�;�EQUIVALENT SINGLE FAMILY CONNECTIONS AREA TOTAL USED AVAIL. CIVIL. 1 1,270 170 1,100 - SURVEY 2 2,880 560 2,320 - CONSULTANTS, INC xIDraiv, uaaxo 3 6,800 2,200 4,600 - * CONTROLLING PIPE - d — — ----------- — 12l17/07 Figure 2 - Service Area 1 & Sub -Areas City of Meridian Downtown Redevelopment 1 Cir tllj"A�W77 f A_ 7A` Vf� ` o 1 A HdRi an {{ rIj 1,1717: ''��" EL M E.1r{ ` ? 1 I i�— M GROSS AREA AND CURRENT FLOWS R ( (� � �1 SUB—AREA ACRES CFS A 7 0.02 65 0.04 `�' - - C 10 0.01 p 14 0.02 CIVIL { �' ; E 20 0.04 . ` SURVEY - - + "'" F 32 0.03 CONSULTANTS, INC = _....... e G 10 0.01 MERIDIAN, IDAHO *``�' - TOTAL 158 0.17 12/17/07 19/17/07 r N v N g v x vi Dv x 0 o b cc- 3 L� �cx rkoro E m E$ v E c� S E a E c 0 E U�U> > v O a Z U U Q ccc d oaa00000:o U) LL QL 0 0 0 0 cn 0 a) LL c 0 0 �Ln V E ti • Glenn K. Bennett, P.L.& President Timothy A Burgess, P.E. Vice President Len Grady, PE City of Meridian 600 E. Watertower, Suite 200 Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Downtown Sewer Study Dear Len, r� U Civil survey Consultants, Inc. 1400 East Watertower Street Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642-7786 (208)888312 Fax 888-0323 December 17, 2007 I have completed my initial evaluation of Meridian's existing sanitary sewer collection system to determine if additional capacity is available for redevelopment of the downtown area. First, I must qualify what I am about to report by the fact that my evaluation was localized and does not consider global impacts by development throughout Meridian. Any development outside the downtown core area will impact overall sewer system capacity and may reduce capacity available for downtown redevelopment. Excluding outside influences, my initial evaluation indicates that the existing sewer trunk lines and main collector lines serving the downtown area can accommodate additional sewage flows typically generated by redevelopment of the downtown area. An exception would be high density multi -story residential development, or commercial development that would develop very high flows. My evaluation is based upon the computer model that you developed using EPA SWMM software. This model predicted an average flow of 8.62 cfs, and peak flow of 14.29 cfs at the treatment plant based upon the inflows and time pattern developed on October 01, 2006. My evaluation is also based upon a peaking factor of 2.7 for peak hour vs. average daily flows and 240 gallons per day generated by an Equivalent Single Family Connection (ESFC). Available pipe capacity is based upon full flow conditions during a peak hour event. The model results have been checked at one location on Broadway Avenue by in -pipe flow monitoring conducted by city staff during the period of September 22, 2007 through October 24, 2007. All of the wastewater generated in the downtown area is carried to the treatment plant by the trunk line along Five Mile Creek. There are three main drainage basins that serve the downtown area via three collector mains. Figure 1 identifies each of these main drainage basins as Area 1, Area. 2 and Area 3. Area 1, which is served by a 12 -inch collector main located in Cherry Lane between NW 81h Street and Meridian Road, includes approximately 158 gross acres. The controlling segment of this collector line has capacity to serve 1,270 connections of which 170 are used leaving additional capacity to serve 1,100 connections. • Grady December 17, 2007 Page 2 of 3 U Area 2, which is served by an 18 -inch collector main that begins at the intersection of Cherry Lane and Broadway, runs south to Broadway, then east in Broadway to Meridian Road, and includes approximately 484 gross acres. The controlling segment of this collector line has capacity to serve 2,880 connections of which 560 are used leaving additional capacity to serve 2,320 connections. Area 3 includes in excess of 800 acres, a majority of which are east and south of the downtown area. I estimate that there are only approximately 90 acres that could be considered as potential downtown area Area 3 is served by a 21 -inch collector main that begins at Five Mile Creek behind Albertson's, runs south to Cherry Lane, then east in Cherry Lane until it hits Five Mile Creek again. The controlling segment of this collector line has capacity to serve 6,800 connections of which 2,200 are used leaving additional capacity to serve 4,600 connections. The collector mains serving Areas 1, 2 and 3 all eventually discharge to the Five Mile Creek trunk line in NW 8s' Street near the Water Department building. The controlling section of the trunk line, which is located on Ustick Road between Linder Road and Ten Mile Road, has capacity to serve 7,870 connections, of which 5,400 are used leaving additional capacity to serve 2,400 connections. I also looked at sub -basins within each of the three service areas. Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the approximate boundary of each sub -basin within each main service area, the gross area of each sub - basin, and the peak flow predicted by the model. Each of these sub -basins is served by an 8 -inch diameter minimum pipe, which is typically capable of handling 0.77 cfs peak flow. As you can see by the tables on each figure currently predicted flows from all of the sub -basins serving the downtown area are well below the full flow capacity of an 8 -inch pipe. Based upon the capacity numbers presented above and as shown on Figures 1-4, I believe that the three main collector lines serving the downtown area have capacity the handle residential and commercial redevelopment typically occurring as part of downtown redevelopment. The only exception would be high density multi -story residential development, or commercial development that would develop very high flows. There will be some local lines within the downtown area that need to be evaluated as specific development plans are submitted for approval. Figure 5 shows the area that you have identified as the first phase of downtown redevelopment. This area includes approximately 51 gross acres that currently produce wastewater flows equivalent to 40 Equivalent Single Family Connections (ESFC's). Excluding roadway right-of-way and city property there are approximately 27 of land that could be redeveloped. I assumed that this area would be developed using the concept for the Old Town Zone provided by planning and zoning based upon 50% residential at 12 ESFC's per acre, and 50% commercial using 27 ESFC's per acre, resulting in wastewater flow equivalent to 531 additional ESFC's. The collector line in Broadway, which serves this area, has capacity to serve 2,320 additional connections. As you can see from this example, the predicted Phase 1 redevelopment would utilize 23% the available capacity in the collector line serving Area 2 and 22% of the available capacity in the 5 -Mile Trunk Line, emphasizing the need to consider the impact of all redevelopment and new development as it relates to available sewer system capacity. 0 Grady December 17, 2007 Page 3 of 3 0 As previous stated, my evaluation is based upon the existing sewer system model and the inflows and time pattern developed on October 01, 2006. The results of the model have been compared to actual in - pipe flow monitoring at one location in Broadway Avenue during the period of September 22, 2007 through October 24, 2007. I recommend that you conduct additional in -pipe flow monitoring in the collector lines serving each of the drainage basins as a further check on the model predictions. Thank you for the opportunity to assist with evaluation of the existing sewer collection system. Sincerely, CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, INC. e-�A Tim Burgess, PE Vice President Figure 1 - Sewer Collector Line Service Area City of Meridian Downtown Redevelopment l CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, INC MERIDIAN, IDAHO INNS - i''" —_ _— — — —_ _—— - - 7 — — lo — — — — — — — — —' �- _ _ — ------ ---- _ _-- L_ _-- - -_- -_ i— 4 .z. _ - - — — T - -_—__-' _ _ _ --- _---__ — -- -- L. L _7.� — — — — — — — — — _—_ -r _ — — — — — iL, I — -- — l-- —— — -- _ — « COLLECTOR LINE CAPACITY AS — `` EQUIVALENT SINGLE FAMILY CONNECTIONS _ AREA TOTAL USED AVAIL. — ?_= 1 1,270 170 1,100 _ 2 2,880 560 2,320 — 3 6,800 2,200 4,600 CONTROLLING PIPE 12/17/07 \° , MM ` y ' \1Mill 1 ; PI X"Aft On w 1_0 77-1 _=6�y 7111_!-�, _ t r � s Ai � '��. rte--- - — �t W171' 'm'" 'R t- -. r •� 1' `41 _L-i 1 i c `+P � J GROSS AREA AND CURRENT FLOWS Q �r SUB -AREA ACRES CFS o ff .1 A 7 0.02 B 65 0.04 C 10 0.01 CIVIL f D 14 0.02 E 20 0.04 ,.. SURVEY — __ F 32 0.03 CONSULTANTS, INC G 10 0.01 MERIDIAN, IDAHO _ o —TOTAL 158 0.17 12/17/07 12/17/07 4w RECEIVEJ) ►"'12 0 2007 CITY COUNCIL QUESTIONS REGA]RE�V OF MERIDIAN DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT I rA FRS' �r,-►�� In an effort to seek guidance from City Council on the redevelopment of downtown, staff seeks answers to the following questions to ensure that we all understand the vision for downtown and how it is to be paid for. PUBLIC WORKS Due to the differing costs associated with redevelopment of downtown versus greenfields development, there is a larger question about should one type of development help pay for another. This is a fundamental policy decision that will likely affect the entire development of Meridian's future. As a city, if a decision is made to bring development downtown, there must be policy decisions made to support or enhance that position. In that effort the following questions are proposed: • Do we impose an additional fee for downtown to increase capacity in the area? • What are the priority areas for downtown development? • The first developments coming in will likely take up the remaining capacity. Is that OK? FIRE DEPARTMENT • Will the Council support more restrictive fire sprinkler requirements in the downtown area if water supply is limited? • What restrictions if any are to be placed on building heights? PARKS AND RECREATION • Does the vision for downtown still include a variety of parks and open spaces, including hardscape plazas, street trees, and, and green open spaces? • As the City grows and downtown events like the Christmas Tree lighting grow, should the Parks & Rec Dept. seek out new, larger venues for such events, or do you envision it always being held at Generations Plaza due to its central location? The Downtown Marketing Strategy identifies the McFadden property near the north end of E 3rd Street as a possible future downtown park. Does the Council share this vision? Should the Parks Dept keep the future acquisition of this property on its radar? • Should the Parks Dept. plan to continue maintaining the downtown streetscape long term? • Does the Council have specific ideas to share regarding the location and function of future downtown parks and open spaces? • How should bicycles be accommodated in and around downtown? Should Main/ E 3rd be the priority routes for bikes to get through the downtown area? • What role will the Parks & Rec Dept have in the pedestrian -priority street improvements being discussed for E 2nd? PLANNING The block between Main and Meridian does not appear to be attracting pedestrian - oriented development (compared to the east side of Main Street). 2nd Street seems to be pulling more interest at this time. Given that nothing is actually being built yet, this maybe overstated. • Does Council want to consider different design requirements for the Main/Meridian block? Some developers are converting homes along Main and Meridian Streets north of Carlton south of Fairview/Cherry to offices while others are razing the existing home to build new office uses. The latter has raised some concerns that such development is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. • Is there a desire to adopt standards that encourage converting homes to offices and discourage razing them for new construction? City Hall construction is pressing forward without a clear plan on how to address parking issues. • Does Council have any guidance or thoughts on how they would like staff to move forward on the parking needs of City Hall? The Downtown Design Guidelines call for two to four story structures in the Downtown Core. The Marketing Strategy suggests that the taller buildings (four stories) are appropriate and/or desirable along the rail corridor to support future transit. We are hearing rumors of buildings as tall as six or seven stories being designed for the rail corridor. The Fire Department and Police Department have not anticipated taller buildings in this area and question if higher densities next to the rail corridor used to transport industrial products including hazardous materials to and through Boise and Meridian are appropriate. Buildings of such size may consume much of the available sewer and/or water capacity for the area. • Are six and seven story buildings desirable within the Downtown Core and/or the Rail Corridor? The area generally bounded by the McFadden piece up to Fairview and from 3rd street to Meridian has some unusual transportation and sewer constraints. Does Council desire a specific plan for this area? Should the boundaries be extended for the whole Old Town area? The Downtown Design Guidelines generally treat alleys as utilitarian areas. Is there a desire on the part of Council to make alleys less utilitarian and more attractive, well -lit, etc? Is there a desire on the part of Council to vacate some of the alleys within Downtown, similar to what was done for the City Hall site? GENERAL DOWNTOWN QUESTIONS • Does Council share the overall vision that downtown is to be the true center and heart of the community? The Marketing Strategy emphasizes that downtown development will emphasize 7 key strengths, as follows: o Social retail at street level; o Cultural, continuing education and recreational ("livability") facilities; o Offices for businesses that serve Meridian residents and economic strengths; o Highly livable urban homes; o A Treasure Valley business/ transit village along the rail corridor; o A strong, highly visible civic presence; o A circulation system for cars, bikes and pedestrians that makes Downtown a great place to be and to visit. Does Council still share this vision? • With Meridian's demographics, including a high percentage of young families with children, should downtown continue to emphasize family-oriented public spaces that are managed to host a wide range of social, cultural and civic activities? Will sidewalks/streetscape and street -level businesses be fostered that create an atmosphere strongly attractive to pedestrians? • 0 • Will downtown policies foster a variety of urban housing opportunities to provide a built-in residential community that attracts and uses city center business? FINANCE The following are different funding options for funding enterprise infrastructure. Is there a preferred mechanism to be used for downtown redevelopment, or should all finance tools be used? I - Revenue Bonds — Bonds issued using a pledge of revenue from the project for the payback. Interest rates are generally low. Revenue bonds require a simple majority vote or judicial confirmation. Judicial confirmation is not considered to be an option in Idaho. Funding of a debt service fund is required. Process To do revenue bonds, you need to retain bond counsel, investment underwriter, and trustee. You must also be willing to raise rates to cover bond payments. In addition, you need to plan and hold an election. Be assigned rating by bond rating agency — rating is based on criteria like; pledged revenues, flow of funds, economic growth prospects, employment stability, debt service ratios, system capacity to meet demand, operations, ability to compel usage, financial planning and leadership, willingness to raise rates. H — Idaho Department of Environmental Quality - Loans and Grants Idaho State Drinking Fund Revolving Fund — Purpose is to assist public water systems finance the cost of infrastructure needed to achieve or maintain compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1996. Projects are ranked based on certain criteria with the most points be assigned to an unsafe or failed water issue and the least points assigned to issues such as storage, pumping, and distribution issues. Projects must be completed with 28 months of the loan closing. For FY08 the fund loaned $38 million to several small cities in Idaho. Planning Grant for Public Water Systems To develop engineering reports identifying how to upgrade a public water system to meet state and federal standards. These grants will pay up to 50% of the eligible expenses for planning costs. III - Tax Increment Financing — Economic Development Agency — Bonds issued by an urban renewal agency repaid with incremental tax revenues. Incremental tax value increases should be created by the project that the bonds financed. There is a risk that the incremental increase will not lower then anticipated and some political n fallout because the additional taxes are not available to other taxing districts. However the urban renewal agency can bond without a vote. IV. — Local Improvement Districts — Allows an assessment of fees for particular improvements within a defined area. It requires 60% of property owners to be assessed within the area to sign a petition of approval. After required signatures are obtained, it can be approved by Council after following hearing requirements etc. V.- Idaho Bond Fund — The bond bank combines the bonds issued by multiple cities into one large tax exempt bond and then sells that bond in the municipal bond market. The bonds have a high credit rating because they have a pledge of the State's sale tax. IV — Impact Fees — Contributed Capital 0 • CITY COUNCIL QUESTIONS REGARDING DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT In an effort to seek guidance from City Council on the redevelopment of downtown, staff seeks answers to the following questions to ensure that we all understand the vision for downtown and how it is to be paid for. PUBLIC WORKS Due to the differing costs associated with redevelopment of downtown versus greenfields development, there is a larger question about should one type of development help pay for another. This is a fundamental policy decision that will likely affect the entire development of Meridian's future. As a city, if a decision is made to bring development downtown, there must be policy decisions made to support or enhance that position. In that effort the following questions are proposed: • Do we impose an additional fee for downtown to increase capacity in the area? • What are the priority areas for downtown development? • The first developments coming in will likely take up the remaining capacity. Is that OK? FIRE DEPARTMENT • Will the Council support more restrictive fire sprinkler requirements in the downtown area if water supply is limited? • What restrictions if any are to be placed on building heights? PARKS AND RECREATION • Does the vision for downtown still include a variety of parks and open spaces, including hardscape plazas, street trees, and, and green open spaces? • As the City grows and downtown events like the Christmas Tree lighting grow, should the Parks & Rec Dept. seek out new, larger venues for such events, or do you envision it always being held at Generations Plaza due to its central location? • The Downtown Marketing Strategy identifies the McFadden property near the north end of E 3rd Street as a possible future downtown park. Does the Council Page 1 of 5 i share this vision? Should the Parks Dept keep the future acquisition of this property on its radar? • Should the Parks Dept. plan to continue maintaining the downtown streetscape long term? • Does the Council have specific ideas to share regarding the location and function of future downtown parks and open spaces? • How should bicycles be accommodated in and around downtown? Meridian Road will be unfriendly to bicycles due to its high volumes and constrained right- of-way. Should Main/ E 3rd be the priority routes for bikes to get through the downtown area? • What role will the Parks & Rec Dept have in the pedestrian -priority street improvements being discussed for E 2nd? PLANNING The block between Main and Meridian does not appear to be attracting pedestrian - oriented development (compared to the east side of Main Street). 2nd Street seems to be pulling more interest at this time. Given that nothing is actually being built yet, this maybe overstated. • Does Council want to consider different design requirements for the Main/Meridian block? Some developers are converting homes along Main and Meridian Streets north of Carlton south of Fairview/Cherry to offices while others are razing the existing home to build new office uses. The latter has raised some concerns that such development is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. • Is there a desire to adopt standards that encourage converting homes to offices and discourage razing them for new construction? City Hall construction is pressing forward without a clear plan on how to address parking issues. • Does Council have any guidance or thoughts on how they would like staff to move forward on the parking needs of City Hall? The Downtown Design Guidelines call for two to four story structures in the Downtown Core. The Marketing Strategy suggests that the taller buildings (four stories) are appropriate and/or desirable along the rail corridor to support future transit. We are hearing rumors of buildings as tall as six or seven stories being designed for the rail Page 2 of 5 corridor. The Fire Department and Police Department have not anticipated taller buildings in this area and question if higher densities next to the rail corridor used to transport industrial products including hazardous materials to and through Boise and Meridian are appropriate. Buildings of such size may consume much of the available sewer and/or water capacity for the area. • Are six and seven story buildings desirable within the Downtown Core and/or the Rail Corridor? The area generally bounded by the McFadden piece up to Fairview and from 3'd street to Meridian has some unusual transportation and sewer constraints. Does Council desire a specific plan for this area? Should the boundaries be extended for the whole Old Town area? The Downtown Design Guidelines generally treat alleys as utilitarian areas. • Is there a desire on the part of Council to make alleys less utilitarian and more attractive, well -lit, etc? Is there a desire on the part of Council to vacate some of the alleys within Downtown, similar to what was done for the City Hall site? GENERAL DOWNTOWN QUESTIONS • Does Council share the overall vision that downtown is to be the true center and heart of the community? The Marketing Strategy emphasizes that downtown development will emphasize 7 key strengths, as follows: o Social retail at street level; o Cultural, continuing education and recreational ("livability") facilities; o Offices for businesses that serve Meridian residents and economic strengths; o Highly livable urban homes; o A Treasure Valley business/ transit village along the rail corridor; o A strong, highly visible civic presence; o A circulation system for cars, bikes and pedestrians that makes Downtown a great place to be and to visit. Does Council still share this vision? • Will Council continue to champion the Split Corridor for downtown streets so that the circulation and parking systems encourage people to come "to" Downtown, while facilitating "through" traffic around Downtown? • With Meridian's demographics, including a high percentage of young families with children, should downtown continue to emphasize family-oriented public Page 3 of 5 spaces that are managed to host a wide range of social, cultural and civic activities? • Will sidewalks/streetscape and street -level businesses be fostered that create an atmosphere strongly attractive to pedestrians? • Will downtown policies foster a variety of urban housing opportunities to provide a built-in residential community that attracts and uses city center business? FINANCE The following are different funding options for funding enterprise infrastructure. Is there a preferred mechanism to be used for downtown redevelopment, or should all finance tools be used? I - Revenue Bonds — Bonds issued using a pledge of revenue from the project for the payback. Interest rates are generally low. Revenue bonds require a simple majority vote or judicial confirmation. Judicial confirmation is not considered to be an option in Idaho. Funding of a debt service fund is required. Process To do revenue bonds, you need to retain bond counsel, investment underwriter, and trustee. You must also be willing to raise rates to cover bond payments. In addition, you need to plan and hold an election. Be assigned rating by bond rating agency — rating is based on criteria like; pledged revenues, flow of funds, economic growth prospects, employment stability, debt service ratios, system capacity to meet demand, operations, ability to compel usage, financial planning and leadership, willingness to raise rates. II — Idaho Department of Environmental Quality - Loans and Grants Idaho State Drinking Fund Revolving Fund — Purpose is to assist public water systems finance the cost of infrastructure needed to achieve or maintain compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1996. Projects are ranked based on certain criteria with the most points be assigned to an unsafe or failed water issue and the least points assigned to issues such as storage, pumping, and distribution issues. Projects must be completed with 28 months of the loan closing. For FY08 the fund loaned $38 million to several small cities in Idaho. Planning Grant for Public Water Systems To develop engineering reports identifying how to upgrade a public water system to meet state and federal standards. These grants will pay up to 50% of the eligible expenses for planning costs. Page 4of5 • •- III - Tax Increment Financing — Economic Development Agency — Bonds issued by an urban renewal agency repaid with incremental tax revenues. Incremental tax value increases should be created by the project that the bonds financed. There is a risk that the incremental increase will not lower then anticipated and some political fallout because the additional taxes are not available to other taxing districts. However the urban renewal agency can bond without a vote. IV. — Local Improvement Districts — Allows an assessment of fees for particular improvements within a defined area. It requires 60% of property owners to be assessed within the area to sign a petition of approval. After required signatures are obtained, it can be approved by Council after following hearing requirements etc. V.- Idaho Bond Fund —The bond bank combines the bonds issued by multiple cities into one large tax exempt bond and then sells that bond in the municipal bond market. The bonds have a high credit rating because they have a pledge of the State's sale tax. IV — Impact Fees — Contributed Capital Page 5 of 5