Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Tuscany Village Traffic Study
.~, i~ ~~ i t ~; DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, ID APRIL 30, 2003 SUBMITTED T0: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 318 E. 37TH ST. BgSE, ID 83714 qTY OF MERIDIAN 33 E. IDAHO AVE. MERIDIAN, ID 83642 DOBIE ENgNEERING, INC. 777 HEARTHSTONE DR., BOISE, ID 83702 (20$)345-3290 '' TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Study Objectives This study was initiated to assess the traffic impacts resulting from the development of the Tuscany Village Subdivision and to evaluate the capacity of '~ the road system to accommodate the site-generated traffic. Dobie Engineering, Inc., was retained by the developer to perform this traffic study in accordance with ACHD and City of Meridian policy for development impact studies. L On-Site Development Tuscany Village Subdivision is a proposed 33 acre residential development containing 136 single family lots plus a neighborhood park site. ' The property is located south of Victory Road and west of Locust Grove Road in Meridian, Idaho. The project will be developed in phases and is now estimated to be fully developed by the year 2005. Illustrated in Figure 1 is a general vicinity map showing the location of the proposed subdivision and adjacent roads and subdivisions. Prepared 6y Dobie Engineering, Inc. r r r ~~ ' TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 2 PROJECTED TRAFFIC Existing Road System Traffic Volume Recent average daily traffic counts on the major roadways near the site are listed in Table 1. .r Table 7 Existing Traffic Volumes Average Dailv Traffic: VehiGes Der Dav: Date of Count: Locust Grove South of Overland Road 3,356 6/02 Locust Grove South of Victory Road 1,176 4/02 Eagle Road South of Overland Road 10,232 2102 ' Eagle Road South of Victory Road 4,989 2/02 Victory Road East of Locust Grove Road 3,555 4/02 d E l R 404 2102 5 oa ag e Victory Road East of , r l E t i l i e a ag nor ar er . South Eagle Road is an ACRD road designated as a m Road is improved south of Victory Road with two traffic lanes and 3 ft. paved shoulders. The posted speed limit is 50 mph. Prepared by Doble Engineering, Inc. - TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 3 ' Victory Road is currently designated as a~collector with a two lane 30 ft. rural paved section. The posted speed limit is 50 mph adjacent to the site. Locust Grove Road is an unclassified section line road with a 2 lane 30 ft. rural paved section south of Victory Road. The posted speed limit is 50 mph. t The Locust GroveNictory Road intersection is currently all-way-stop-control without auxiliary turn lanes on any approach. The level of service is currently "B." Current average daily traffic and peak hour turning movement counts were collected for the system roadways and intersections. Peak hour traffic data were obtained from recent ACHD traffic counts, DEt counts and traffic studies prepared in 2002 for the Tuscany Lakes development. More recent counts were I not collected due to on-going road construction in the area. These volumes for the year 2002 are summarized in Figures 2 and 3. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. 1 i FIGURE 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AM PEAK HOUR YEAR 2002 N N <M VICTORY RQAD ° ° ~~4 Liao ~~4 t-t5o 40 ~ ~ 0 ~ too tOD J ~ 20 150 ~ 100 20 ', h~~- 2DZ h~~ N ~ ~ O Q o ~ O W O ~ Q ~ w U O Traffic Study Prepared By. ~. ~ D08VE ENGINEEPoNG, INC. DATE OF CDUNT: 2-t9-02 '" "°""~°" m e"~' a tTOe ~~ FIGURE 3 EXISTiIdG CONDITIOfdS PM PEAK HOUR YEAR 2002 N 000 VICTORY ROAD ° ~ " t , 00 ~ ~ ~ '~ 100 • ~ 200 30 50 + ~ ~ 200. 20 1 ~ 30 . . 50 ~~ 80 I 20 ~ ~~ z h~~- h~r~ utn~ O O O 000 S O N l~ Q 0 111 > O Ill' ~ J ~ ~ Q I- ~ E~ C7 O Traffic Study Prepared,By. ~: ~ DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. DATE OF COUNT: 2-18-02 m xwuua~. a. m., o ssmx ~ssmo TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 4 ' Pre-Development Conditions The capacity of the existing street system was calculated for year 2005 traffic conditions. This includes the projected traffic from the Tuscany Lakes development, but not site traffic from the proposed Tuscany Village lots. This calcution was made to establish baseline conditions from which to assess site-generated traffic impacts. The projected capacity of the adjacent system roadways is shown in Table 3. Table 3 Roadway Cap acities -Baseline Conditions Location: ADT No_of LOS D Lanes Capacity Vol./CaD. LOS Locust Grove n/o Victory 8,000 2 12,000 .57 A Locust Grove s/o Victory 4,200 2 12,000 .30 A Victory w/o Locust Grove 9,000 2 9,500 .80 4 D B Victory e/o Locust Grove 7,200 2 9,500 .6 Assumed in this analysis is a planning capacity of 12,000 vpd (L OS D) on a two-lane rural highway and 9,500 vpd on a rural collector. Arterial capacities follow the guidelines in Appendix 1-C of the Regional Transportation Plan. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 5 i The year 2005 baseline service levels at the arterial intersections is shown in Table 4 below. In this analysis service levels were calculated based on the existing lane configuration and all-way-stop-control. Details of baseline traffic volumes as well as service level worksheets are contained in Appendix A. 4 Table Peak Hour LOS Analysis for Victory/Locust Grove Intersection Existing Traffic Baseline Traffic ADDroaches: AM PM AM PM Eastbound A A D D Westbound A B C F Northbound A A C C ' Southbound A A C F Intersection A B C F i This analysis found that adequate capacity now exists on the system roads and intersections to accommodate additional growth. The baseline traffic deficiencies were addressed in the traffic impact study for Tuscany Lakes.. In that report it was recommended that left-turn lanes be added on all approaches idi an. to accommodate the regional traffic growth in this area of Mer Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. LJ i i r 1 TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 6 Trip Generation The following trip rates are recommended in the ITE Trip Generation Manual , (6th Edition), for the proposed land uses. These rates were used in this report to project traffic volumes within the study area: Table 5 Trip Generation Rates Residential Occurance Single Familv (per Unii) Weekday End Trips 9.57 AM Peak Hour 0.75 Enter (25%) Exit (75°,6) PM Peak Hour 1.01 Enter (64~) Exit (36%) Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. 1 i TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 7 Using the trip generation rates in Table 5, future site-generated traffic was estimated for full buildout of the Tuscany Village lots. The findings are presented in Table 6. Table 6 Site-Generated Traffic (Rounded) Number New TriDS/Dav Residential Lots 136 lots 1300 AM PH Trios PM PH Trios 100 135 Traffic projections for the study area were obtained from COMPASS and reflect current planning assumptions in the 2005 Transportation Planning Model. Table 7 Regional Traffic Model Protections (Rounded) 2010 2025 Locust Grove North of Victory 900 4,100 Victory East of Locust Grove 11,200 13,900 Victory West of Locust Grove 10,800 12,700 Eagle Road North of Victory 13,200 20,700 Prepared by Doble Engineering, Inc. TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 8 ' Traffic Assignments Based on the trip generation rates and regional growth projections previously presented, future trips resulting from development of the Tuscany Village Subdivision lots were estimated and assigned to the internal streets and project entrances. The projected average daily traffic volumes on the internal r streets at full buildout of the subdivision are illustrated in Figure 4. Shown in Figures 5 and 6 are projected year 2005 AM and PM turning movements at the main entrances at full buildout of the subdivision. r f Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. 1 n 1 ~; 1 t ADT ~ AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC FIGURE 4 TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC YEAR 2005 Traffic Study Prepared By. ~. ~ DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. m `mm.mn. a. m... m enoz w-uw r 1 1 r 1 1 1 i FIGURE 5 TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION YR 2005 TURNING MOVEMENTS AM PEAK HOUR a 0 5 U oo~ ~ VICTORY ROAD ~ + 4 f 255 1150 „a S 10 100 ~ S 55 3B0 ~ 250 ~ 5z hA 50~ h~A~ N N ~' ~ TUSCANY VILLAG Q O 0_ W O 0; C7 f- VI U 0 0 in n_ CECINA ST. Y5 J' 10 .i h ~` Ny n Troffic Study Prepored By. ~. $ DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. m 11nrmMme a. mw, o esrm ~+s-sam 1 1 1 i i FIGURE 6 TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION YR 20Q5 TURNING MOVEMENTS PM PEAK HOUR W Q 0 3 VICTORY ROAD J~ ~, y // 150 + 605 t 325 r 25 ,66 s r 65 30o s 110 -s zo Z h A so ~ h ~' I-~ O N O O N TUSCANY VILLAG 0 ~o IN 6 O o! w O (~ r U 0 CECINA ST. 15 5 h '~ 00 r N Troffic Study Prepared By. . ,~- DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. m H.vuaa,. a. eme m ntws w-ueo ' TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 9 CAPACITY ANALYSIS -LEVEL OF SERVICE ' A capacity analysis and a Level of Service calculation were prepared to ' evaluate the present and future traffic conditions at the site entrances and project intersection at Victory Road. Assumed in the analysis were years 2005 baseline plus site traffic conditions. This analysis was based on the procedures ' and methodologies developed in the Highway Capacity Manual (TRB Report 209) for all-way-stop-control intersections. Capacity Analysis: Project Entrance 1 Projected future traffic volumes at the project intersections are shown in ' Figures 5 and 6. It was assumed in the calculations that Victory Road would be improved to a three lane left-turn lane section at the site intersections by the year 2005. Locust Grove Road does not warrant alert-turn lane. ' The findings of this analysis for the project entrances are summarized in Table 8 below. 1 ' Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 r TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 10 Table 8 Level of Service Analysis Project Entrances Left Turn In Left Turn Out Intersection From Main Road From Side Street LOS AM PM A-aN, PM AM PM Ascaino Ave. ~ Victory Rd. A A B C B B Cecina St. @ Locust Grove A A B B B B These findings indicate that all of the main subdivision entrances will function within acceptable standards with installation of the improvements recommended in this study. Refer to Appendix B for details of the calculations. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. ' TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 11 Capacity Analysis: Arterial Intersections ' Presented in Table 9 are the results of a level of service calculation for an all-way-stop-control intersection at Victory Road and Locust Grove Road. Service level standards were calculated for buildout year 2005 PM peak hour ' assuming improved lane geometry with the addition of left-turn lanes on all ' approaches. Details of the calculations are attached in Appendix C. ' Table 9 LOS Analvsis at Victory Road/Locust Grove Road Intersection Buildout Year Traffic Volumes Aooroach AM PM Northbound B B ' Souihbound B C Eastbound C C Westbound C F Intersection C D 1 Projected volumes including both site-generated and off-site traffic are within an acceptable capacity range for the proposed lane geometry at this intersection. With the addition of left-turn lanes on all approaches, acceptable service levels can be maintained. ' Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. 1 1 1 ,. 1 TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 12 Capacity Analysis: Arterial Roads The capacities of the adjacent sections of Victory Road and Locust Grove Road, shown in Table 10, were calculated for the year 2025 with the addition of the site generated traffic. Traffic projections in the current COMPASS Transportaiton Planning Model are attached in Appendix D. Table 70 Arterial Capacity - SiteTraffic Conditions Year 2025 ADT No.Lanes LOS D Cao. Vol./CaD. LOS Victory Road 14,000 2 14,D00 .85 D Locust Grove Road 8,000 2 12,000 .56 A Locust Grove Road will provide sufficient capacity through the year 2025 to accommodate the projected traffic. A two-lane section should be adequate. Victory Road should be reclassified as a minor arterial based on current traffic projections and its location between Eagle Road and SH 69. -With the addition of left-turn lanes at the main subdivision intersections, a two lane section will be sufficient. Prepared by Doble Engineering, Inc. ' TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 13 Capacity Analysis: Lane Geometry at Project Entrances The need for auxiliary lane improvements at the project entrances was evaluated to determine if left-turn lane improvements would be needed to serve the development. Year 2005 PM hour traffic conditions were evaluated. Table 77 Auxiliary Lane Warrants ' ODDOSInO Tur in Advancing Warrant Victory Rd./Cecina St. Volume Volume Volume Met Left Tum 300 vph 25 605 Yes ODDOSIng Turnin Advancing Warrant Locust Grove/Ascaino Ave. Volume Volume Volume Met Left Tum 200 vph 10 200 No Souroe: AASHTO Based on the evaluation criteria contained in the AASHTO Policy Manual a left-turn lane is warranted on Victory Road at Cecina Street due to the higher posted speed. A turn lane is not warranted on Locust Grove Road. ' Prepared by Dobie Engineering,lnc. 1 ~'. ~' APPENDIX ~' APPENDIX A-1 TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION N YR 2005 BASELINE AM PEAK HOUR oo~ VICTORY ROAD ~ ~ y f 250 t.1 0 s 0 4100 700 ~' r 50 400 ~ 0 Z •1 0 0 O 5 U TUSCANY VILLAG °a 0 >w O a: U' V 0 0 ~~ i ~' CECINA ST. 0 1 0 = h ~' om Traffic Study Prepared By. ~: ~ .~' .......... DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. m wsum~. w. ea... o aTmx s~sxeo 250 ~ 50 1 h ~ !' ~° .°n ~° APPENDIX A-2 TUSCANY VILLAGE SUBDIVISION N YR 2005 BASELINE PM PEAK HOUR ' VICTORY ROAD N °o °o ~+~4 ~- soo L~ ° o ~-aoo '~ tsa J ~ so aoo -~ oZ hr- O O Q O 6 UN Q TUSCANY VILLAG O C J O U J O J O ~N CECINA 5T. ° 0 i h O N N TraNic Study Prepared By. ;~: ~ •~ DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. 'rT/ XmNtlans b. e[!s. D 8S)0~ SI~SBe iao -~ so z ~~~ O 00 NI ~. ~~ ~' APPENDIX A I All-Way Stop Control r r r S Page 1 of~ f~' ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS eneral Information na st .DOBIE en ICo. EI Date Pertormed flr1003 ite Information Intersection VICTORY/LOCUST GROVE urisdicson CHD nal sis Year YR. 2002 EXIST. arysis Time Period M o'ed ID IXISTING LANE CONFfGURA7TON st/West Street. VJCTORY ROAD orlhlSouth Street LOCUST GROVE ROAD olume Ad'ustments a nd Site Characteristics roach - Eastbound Westbound ovemeM L T R L T R omme. 40 150 20 30 50 100 Thrus Left Lane 50 50 roach Northbound Southbound ovement L T R L T R olume 20 50 10 30 40 20 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbountl Southbound L1 L2 L7 L2 L1 L2 Li L2 onsgureuon LTR - LTR LTR LTR HF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 low Rate 220 188 83 94 .5 Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 eometry Group 1 i 1 1 urason, T 0.2 5 aturation Headwa Adustmen t Workshee t rop. Left-Tums 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 rop. Righ[-Tums 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.2 rop. Heavy vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LTadj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hlxT-adi -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 Nv-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 i.7 adj, comp4ted 4.59 4.59 4.59 4.59 De arture Headwa a nd Service Time d, initial vawe 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 inisal 0.20 0.17 0.07 0.08 d, Root value 4.59 4.59 4.59 4.59 snot value 0.28 0.23 0.12 0.13 ove-up sme, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ervice Time 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 a ac' and Level o f Service Eastbound Westbound NoMbound Soulhbountl L1 L2 L1 L2 Li L2 L1 L2 patty 470 438 333 344 Delay 9.38 8.64 8.85 8.66 Los A A A A proach: Delay 9.38 8.64 8.65 8.66 Los A A A A Intersection Delay 8.92 - IMersedion LOS ' A ' file://C:1Documents%20and°/a20Settings~DOBIE1Loca1%20SettingslTemp1u2k2.tmp 5/1/2003 All-Way Stop Control ~_R Page 1 of 2 ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information ite Information a st en /Co. Date Pertormed I sis Time Period . DOBIE Ef /252003 M Intersection VICTORYQOCUST GROVE urisdidioo CHD alysls Year YR. 2002 EXIST. ro ecl ID EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION stlWest SVeet: VICTORY ROAD North/SouN Street: LOCUST GROVE ROAD olume Ad'ustmen~ and Site Characteristics roach Eastbound Westbound ovemem L T R L T R oiume 50 50 20 30 200 100 /oThms Left Lane 50 50 mach Northbound Southbound Movement L - T R L T R owme 30 50 10 50 50 30 hThms Left Lane 50 - 50 Eastbound Westbountl Northbound SouUbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 nfrguration LTR LTR LTR LTR HF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Flow Rate 125 346 93 135 o Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 o. Lanes i 1 1 1 eometry Group 1 1 1 1 uratioq T 0.25 aturation Headwa Ad'ustmen t Workshe et Prop. Len-Tums 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.4 Prop. Right-Tums 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 rop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 D.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 RT-aej -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 HV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 adj, computed 4.98 4.98 4.98 4.98 De arture Headwa a nd Service Time d, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 initial 0.11 0.31 0.08 0.12 d, final value 4.98 4.98 4.98 4.98 final value 0.17 0.44 0.14 0.19 ove~up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ervice T7me 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ca ac' and Level o f Service Eastbound Wesl6ourW NoMbountl Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 apacity 375 596 34'3 385 Delay 9.02 11.08 9.14 9.41 os A B A A pmach: Delay 9:02 11.08 9.14 9.41 Los A B A A Intersection Delay 10.13 Intersection LOS B file://C:1Docwnents°/a20and%20SettingslDOBIE1Loca1%20Settings\Temp1u2k2.tmp 5/1/2003 All-Way Stop Control Page I of 2 I ALL-WAY STOP COPITROL ANALYSIS .nnarol Infnrmafinn ifn Infnrmaflnn GROVE ROAD 50 I FBStbound L1 L2 Westbound LT 50 Northbound L1 L2 Southbound L7 L2 rop.Left-Toms 0.5 0.? 0.5 0.3 rop. Right-Toms 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.5 rop. Heavy vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LT-adl 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 RT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.15 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 9.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 9.7 1.7 adi, computed 8.51 8.59 8.51 8.51 Eastbound L1 L2 407 12.33 D D Westbound L1 l2 524 192.74 F i 12.74 F Nodhbound L1 L2 379 23.65 C 23.65 C Southbound L7 L2 451 53.45 F 53.45 F file://C:1Documents%20and%20SettingslDOBIE1Loca1%20SettiLngslTemp1u2k2.tmp 5/1/2003 Two-Way Stop Control r r r ~~ Page 1 of 3 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st P. DOBlE ntersection SCIANO/VICTORY enc /Co. E! urisdiction CHD Date Performed 4/25/2003 al sis Year 2005 W/SlTE nal sis Time Period M HOUR HCS2000T`~ Copyright ®2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1a file://C:1Docurnents%20and%20SettingslDOBIE1Loca1%20SettingslTemp1u2k13.tmp 5/1/2003 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 al st . DOBlE Intersection Tf11961~GYNICTORY enc /Co. EJ urisdiction CHD Date Performed 5/2002 nal sis Year 005 W/SJTE na sis Time Period M HOUR 0 0 R 0 0 Southbound 10 11 12 HCS1000TM Copyrigik ®2000 Uoiversiry of Florida, All Rights Reserved file://C:~Documents%20and%20Settings~DOBIE1Local%20SettingslTemplu2kB.tmp Version 4.1a 5/1/2003 Two-Way Stop Control 1 r LJ Page 1 of 2 ~"~~`~~ K TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY eneral Information ite Information nalyst ency/Co. Date Performed na sis Time Period P. DOB1E DE/ 4/25/2003 AM HOUR Intersection urisdiction nalysis Year CECINA/LOCUST GROVE ACHD 2005 W/S1TE Pro ect Descri lion EastNVest Street CECINA ST. North/South Street: LOCUST GROVE RD. Intersection Orientation: North-South ud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 5 250 0 0 170 5 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourl Flow Rate, HFR 5 263 0 0 178 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 ? 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 0 0 0 25 0 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourl Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 26 0 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (°~) 0 0 Flared Approach N N forage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 i 0 1 onfiguration L R Dela Queue Len th a nd Level of S ervice pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT L R (vPh) 5 26 10 (m)(vph) 1404 566 868 !c 0.00 0.05 0.01 5% queue length 0.01 0.14 0.03 ontrol Delay 7.6 11.7 9.2 LOS A 8 A proach Delay - - 11.0 pproach LOS - - t3 Copyright ®2000 University of Florida, NI Rights Reserved Version 4.1a file://C:1Documents%20and%20SettingslDOBIE1Loca1%20Settings\Temp1u2k18.tmp 5/1/2003 Two-Way Stop Control r r 1 [~ u Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nalyst envy/Co. Date Pertormed nal sis Time Period P. DOBlE DEI 4252003 PM HOUR Intersection urisdiction aysis Year CECINA/LOCUST GROVE ACND 2005 W/SITE Pro ect Descri lion EastMlest Street: CECINA ST. North/South Street: LOCUST GROVE RD. Intersection Orientation: North-South tud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 Z 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 10 220 0 0 200 30 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourl Flow Rate, HFR 10 231 0 0 210 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - - Median T pe Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration LT TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 0 0 0 15 0 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 15 0 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (°h) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 nfiguration L R Dela Queue Len th and Level of S ervice pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT L R (vph) 10 15 5 (m)(vph) 1337 547 818 Ic 0.01 0.03 O.Oi 5°~ queue length 0.02 0.08 0.02 ontrol Delay 7.7 11.8 9.4 LOS A B A pproach Delay - - 11.2 pproach LOS - - 8 Copyright ®2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1a file://C:1Documents%20and%20SettingslDOBIE1Loca1%20SettingslTemp1u2k18.tmp 5/1/2003 ~] i lJ r APPENDIX C r All-Way Stop Control i 1 ~J r i r Page 1 of 2 ~~~~~~ ~ ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS eneral Information ite Information a st enc /Co. . DOBIE E! ntefSeC[ipn VICTORY/LOCUST GROVE udsdiclion CHD Date Performed daysisTimePedod 52003 M a sis Year YR. 2005 SITE TRAFFIC Pm ed ID ADD TURN LANES ALL APPROACHES EasVWest Street: VICTORY ROAD AhlSoulh SUeeL' LOCUST GROVE ROAD olume Ad-ustments a nd Site Characteristics roach Eastbound Westbound ovement L T R L T R olume 155 110 50 65 325 150 oThrus Left Lane 50 50 roach Nodhbound Southbound ovement L T R L T R olume 105 ?05 25 100 115 200 oThrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound NoMbound Southbound L1 L2 Li L2 Lt L2 L1 l2 onYiguration L TR L TR L TR L TR PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Flow Rate 163 ?67 68 499 110 136 105 331 Heavy vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 No. Lanes 2 2 2 2 ometry Group 5 5 5 5 Duretjon, T 0.2 5 aturation Headwa Atl"ustmen t Workshe et Pmp. Lefl-Turns 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 p. Right-Turns 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.6 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LTadj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 RT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 NV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1 J dj, canputetl 8. i3 8.13 8.13 8.13 8.13 8.13 8.13 8.13 De arture Headttva a nd Service Time ,inhiat value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 initial 0.14 0.15 0.06 0.44 0.10 0.12 0.09 0.29 d, finalvalue 8.13 8.13 8.?3 8.13 8.13 8.13 8.13 8.13 gnat value 0.37 0.36 0.?4 1.01 0.26 0.31 0.24 0.69 ve-up tune, m 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 ervice Time 5.8 5.4 5.8 5.4 5.8 5.4 5.8 5.4 a aci and Level o f Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 U L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 adty 4?3 417 318 499 360 386 355. 477 lay 15.50 14.73 11.63 68.54 14.10 14.45 13.22 25.06 os C B 8 F B B B D pproach: Delay 15.11 61.71 14.29 22.20 Los C F B C IMersedion Delay 33.68 ntersection LOS D file//C:1Documcnts%20and%205cttings1L30BIE~I,ocal%ZOScttings\Tcmp1u2k2.tmp 5/1/2003 All-`Jay Stop Contiol r r r r r Page i of 2 ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information ite Information a st en lCo. Date Pertormed alysis Time Pedod . D06fE E! 52003 M ntersection udsdiction na sis Year V(CTORY/LOCUST GROVF CIiD YR. 2005 SITE TRAFFIC Pro ect ID ADD TURN LANES ALL APPROACHES asWVest Street VICTORY ROAD Nodh/Soutll Street: LOCUST GROVE ROAD olume Ad'ustments and Site Characteristics pproach Eastbound Westbound ovement L T R L T R alume 100 250 50 55 110 150 ~Thrus Leff Lane 50 50 roach Northbound Southbound ovement L T R L T R olume 55 165 55 60 100 100 aThrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Sovlhbountl L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Lt L2 onfigurotion L TR L TR L TR L TR PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Flow Rate 105 315 57 272 57 230 63 210 Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 No. Lanes 2 2 g 2 eomelry Group - 5 5 5 5 Duration, T 025 aturation HeadWa Ad'ustmen t Workshe et Prop. Left-Turns 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 mp. RighE~Turrs 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 rop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 g 0.0 0.0 iv.0 i 0.0 LT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 02 0.2 RT-adi -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -©.6 -D.6 ~,RV-adj 1-7 1.7 1.7 ?.7 ?.7 ? 7 i 1 7 ? 7 t hzdj, computed Z08 7.08 7.08 70$ 7.08 7.0$ 7.Oo" 7.0$ De arture Headwa a nd Service Time hd, inttiaf value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, mtiial 0..09 0.28 0.05 024 0.05 0.20 C.06 0.19 hd, final value 7A$ 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.0$ 7.08 ftnal va;u& 0.2? 0.59 0.11 0.51 0.12 0.45 0.13 0.4? ove-up time, m 2.3 2.3 23 2.3 Servica Time 4.$ 4.5 4.$ 4-5 4.8 4.5 a 4.8 4.5 Ca r~aci~ and t.eveE of yen ice _ __ __ ___ _ ~ F_~as~buund vvzsttw.:nd Northbound 5vuf.",bou;:6 -.. Lt t2 Lt L2 Lt L2 1 L1 capardy 356 515 307 518 307 480 E_~.--., 31:i ~ 460 "~. ~ Delay 11.62 1R 9` ?d $7 1804 11.12 15.50 ?i ?9 ?4 37 iL05 i u I C ~ ~ p (, ~ r3 I v ~ L? I i~ ~ ~proaoh: DeiaY ~ ?7. J9 I 15.75 j 14.63 i i3.6ti zos ~ C ~ C ~ 8 E B ,Intersection Delay ?5.35 - l tp,ro~ ~-.;r;,~, i Ofi i , -.~ a „%r t. i - .3.-..'.:o~~e.,.,a,.eive~vi~i:iiaiaj=,~~~i%vu ~'i.-,. ,-ice .r~y.s. ~,u. 3.v,.~.. ie r r i i r r r APPENDIX D m m O .~~ m o ~~ °v bQ s s ~ ~ o O o ° ° O 8 00 ° S m 6 g~ ~ ~ ~ ° n C , 0 0 0 O8 _ N o 1p6D a a OB 0 Co q 0 ~~ ~ g ~ D~ 0 0 y, ~iePmnq~ r '" ~ ~ ° m o n OOES~, °o OOE9 0069 ° 590i~ ~ $~ 0094 0084 OGLE o ° `°° '°° 3400 0095 5: Wb~ fO D049 0099 5700 009b ' OOEb g 0°Lb ° 3900 0094 4 ° Pil elBP~q~ ~ ~ o ~ in °j °o °b n P O O N p ° O l ~ o o ~ O ~ o O ~ ry v v =~ a N 4 ~~ ° ~ & >~ .L '~~ s , s . o o Pa ao~ Pa g6e3 oat 0 0096 Dots 0049 aos9 oozE zt~ OOOBI~ ~ o ODOL 0098 0009 006E 2500 ~ "P21816e3 ~Pa e1~3 ~` p p WN S O ^ ~ O ° O ~ Q O T O S Z A ° E Q a r o N V O O o V O n O m _ ~ ° o zsoo aas a o p N a p, ° zsao aa6 S ° ~° °~ 1 ~ _ ~ O O m 009 m OO6L o 8 OO9mO ~ oott °Oae YY N ° 800 ~p p 0 W ° Y Yf 2 0 r ° f°O ° °° $ ' g B9 MS 69 NS ~ ~ SH 69 < 2000.5 OO6bL OO6ll 11000 6500 8300 ~ °o p ~ °1760[ In ~ OO1EL 004LL 10600 5300 m 69 H9 69 HS SFk 69 0 N 0 m n e C O O O O p (q _ ~ N O ° m P m 0$0 0 0 ° n n m m OO9L 004E o gg~'d BIeP~q~ CbveNak Rd 8600 rv N DOLL 6900 . 9026 008E 0089 7900 0049 8200 OOZG 'Pa eleP+engC Cbverdale Rd" "~ w 0 m o m ~ 0 0 0 m m 0 n m 6200 ~ 7600 OOS 7200 6700 OOE ~~a d D ~ D p C p O O C o j 10a $49 O O 9ott99 oozLL ~ ~ aoe9c 1 $ 0 ,y 0 N l9 M m O ~N ~ ib `~ $ °o m °I ~ '~ w m r m" t ~ m a OOL9 OOL9 WSS 094E 004E O p froLs o° o N i~• p p S N eD OOLZ 9697, ~L2 O O N O d p ~ p ' p G O ) O '400 ~ tlOLSZ p e 'e OF o° ,gyp DOLEZ a eon o n p N N ~ ~ 0 0 g 3 m ~> p O O L m W s Pa e~ea3 OO90L 0096 0066 008& Pa eIBa3 0 w ~ OOZZ 99sL O 4p O N N i~ ~ ~ 68 HS 00851 OOOLI 00946 0084E 69 HS 69 HS p c M v Pa qs~ OOZ9 OOZ9 Pa g0a3 V O D O ~ E Q mlo 15000 12900 O O O N O to m 0 0 0 m m