Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDobaron Annexation Project Filelr�R 0 ,� ��( Ali% PLANNING CONSULTANTS tvApril 6, 1983 Mr. Jack Nieman City Clerk City of Meridian 728 Meridian Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Dobaran et al. Annexation Dear Jack: This letter is a formal request to defer the Dobaran et al. annexation application until such time as we notify you. Thank you for this consideration. hesitate to call me. S incerer�- Alvin ak, S. Marsden } v A -q m'r` 0 oce VecJ If you have any questions do not 410 S. ORCHARD, SUITE 136 BOISE, IDAHO 83705 TELEPHONE (208) 344-4343 Urban and Regional Planning, Urban Design, Project Plans, Ordinances, Transportation Planning, Environmental Assessments, and Special Studies January 25,1983 Mr. Alvin s. Marsden Marsden & Associates p.O.Box 771 Boise jdaho 83701 R.E.: Dobaran et al. Annexation COUNCILMEN GRANT P. KINGSFORD BILL BREWER RICHARD F.ORTON, JR. RONALD R. TOLSMA ANNETTE C. HINRICHS Chairman Zoning & Planning Dear Al, At a special meting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning CcMission held January 24, 1983, the motion was made, seconded and unamiously approved to recofunend to the Meridian City Council that the above Annexation request be denied. sincerely, For the Meridian Planning and Zoning CcaT fission ick �. ity Cle tV •• HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN LAWANA L. NIEMANN, City Clerk A. M. KIEBERT, Treasurer 728 Meridian Street RICHARD D. NICHOLS, Chief of Police BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. MERIDIAN, IDAHO JOHN O. FITZGERALD, Attorney 83642 ROGER WELKER, Fire Chief Pbone 888-4433 EARL WARD, Waste Water Supt. JOSEPH L. GLAISYER Mayor January 25,1983 Mr. Alvin s. Marsden Marsden & Associates p.O.Box 771 Boise jdaho 83701 R.E.: Dobaran et al. Annexation COUNCILMEN GRANT P. KINGSFORD BILL BREWER RICHARD F.ORTON, JR. RONALD R. TOLSMA ANNETTE C. HINRICHS Chairman Zoning & Planning Dear Al, At a special meting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning CcMission held January 24, 1983, the motion was made, seconded and unamiously approved to recofunend to the Meridian City Council that the above Annexation request be denied. sincerely, For the Meridian Planning and Zoning CcaT fission ick �. ity Cle Mr. Alvin S. Marsden Marsden & Associates P.O. Box 771 Boise,Idaho 83701 R.E.: amprehensive Plan Amendment Request on Behalf of Property Owners Dobaran et al. Dear Al, At a special meeting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Conmission held January 24, 1983 at the Meridian City Hall the application for the proposed amendment to the Meridian Comprehensive Plan by Marsden & Associates representing properly owners of Dobaran et al. was denied. This decision may be appealed as stated in paragraph e, page 63 of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and #14 of the Conclusions. Sincerely, For Meridian Planning Zoning. ssion ck ity Cler Enclosure: Pg.63 Ccnnp Plan. - #14 Conclusions 4 c HUB OF TREASURE 17 ALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN COUNCILMEN GRANT P..KINGSFORD LAWANA L. NIEMANN, City Clerk BILL BREWER A. M.KIEBERT,Treasurer 728 Meridian Street RICHARD F.ORTON,JR. RONALD R. TOLSMA RICHARD D. NICHOLS, Chief of Police BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. MERIDIAN, IDAHO ANNETTE C. HINRICHS JOHN 0. FITZGERALD, Attorney 83642 Chairmen Zoning 8 Planning ROGER W ELKER, Fire Chief Phone 888 4433 EARL WARD, Waste Water Supt. JOSEPH L. GLAISYER Mayor January 25,1983 Mr. Alvin S. Marsden Marsden & Associates P.O. Box 771 Boise,Idaho 83701 R.E.: amprehensive Plan Amendment Request on Behalf of Property Owners Dobaran et al. Dear Al, At a special meeting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Conmission held January 24, 1983 at the Meridian City Hall the application for the proposed amendment to the Meridian Comprehensive Plan by Marsden & Associates representing properly owners of Dobaran et al. was denied. This decision may be appealed as stated in paragraph e, page 63 of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and #14 of the Conclusions. Sincerely, For Meridian Planning Zoning. ssion ck ity Cler Enclosure: Pg.63 Ccnnp Plan. - #14 Conclusions '1 P & Z Hearing November 8, 2 MARSDjh& ASSOCIATES PLANOW CONSULTANTS 410 S. Orchard Suite 136 Boise Idaho 83705 PAID: $700.00 DOBARAN ANNEX. C O M M E N T S 1: Ada County Highway District, Carol C. Kirby: See letter attached 10.29.82 2: Nampa Meridian Irrigation Dist, Richard Haumann: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has a drain ditch on the south side of the U.P.Railroad - Evans Drain. We maintain it from time to time. 3: Central District Health Dept; Nancy Goodell: If individual on-site sewage disposal systems are desired on an interim basis until City services become available, then test holes for determination of high seasonal groundwater must be dug during September of any year -prior to any further consideration or review of proposed development. 4: Councilman Ronald Tolsma: I don't think that we need to annex any more ground at this time. We already have ground in the City limits that is zoned "D" that has not a thing but weeds - until the economy starts to move and people or businesse's want to build new bldgs, there is no reason to extend our services to Cloverdale Road. If these people who want annexed have people signed on the dotted line committed to build, then maybe this would warrant a second look at annexation request. 5: Police Chief Doug Nichols: "No comment at this time." 6: Gary D.Smith, City Engineer: See Letter Attached 10.29.82 7: Hearing November 8,1982 convened due to lack of QuorLzm: tabled until December 13,1982. 8: Hearing Dec. 13,1982: P & Z scheduled Workshop to be held January 5,1983. 9: Regular meeting held January 10,1983 convened by lack of Quorum: Special meeting scheduled for January 24,1983. 10: Special Meeting held January 24, 1983 , P& Z Recamiends to the City City Council that Annexation be denied. 11: Special Meeting held January 24, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission unanimous denied the application for Amendment to Comprehensive Plan. A G E N D A November 8, 1982 NOTE: DUE TO THE LACK OF QUORUM FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DIRE= BY COYMSSIONMEMBER BOB -EE• ANY TESTIMONY WILL BE TAPED, TRANSCRIBED AND FILED LaW �L. NiC' Clerk H• P & Z Hearing November 8, 82 IR C O M M E N T S DOBARAN et al \J MARSDEN & ASSOCIATES PLANNING CONSULTANTS 410 S. Orchard Suite 136 Boise Idaho 83705 PAID: $700.00 DOBARAN ANNEX. 1: Ada County Highway District, Carol C. Kirby: See letter attached 10.29.82 2: Nampa Meridian Irrigation Dist, Richard Haumann: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has a drain ditch on the south side of the U.P.Railroad - Evans Drain. We maintain it from time to time. 3: Central District Health Dept; Nancy Goodell: If individual on-site sewage disposal systems are desired on an interim basis until City services become available, then test holes for determination of high seasonal groundwater must be dug during September of any year -prior to any further consideration or review of proposed development. 4: Councilman Ronald Tolsma: I don't think that we need to annex any more ground at this time. We already have ground in the City limits that is zoned "D" that has not a thing but weeds - until the economy starts to move and people or businesse's want to build new bldgs, there is no reason to extend our services to Cloverdale Road. If these people who want annexed have people signed on the dotted line committed to build, then maybe this would warrant a second look at annexation request. 5: Police Chief Doug Nichols: "No comment at this time." • CHARLES L. WINDER, PRESIDENT KARL JEPPESEN, VICE PRESIDENT LAWRENCE C. JACKSON, SECRETARY • October 29, 1982 Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meridian City Council 728 Meridian Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Commission and Council Members, 318 E. 37TH STREET BOISE, IDAHO 83704 PHONE: 344-6111 Re: Dobaran ET AL Annexation North of Union Pacific Railroad and East of Eagle Road 184 Acres - "D" Industrial The Ada County Highway District's Commissioners in meeting on October 28, 1982 reviewed the subject annexation and offers the following comments/ recommendations: The overall parcel straddles the U.P. Railroad and abuts Cloverdale, Franklin, and Eagle Road. It lies within the Eagle impact area but outside the Eagle urban service planning area. Since the application is for annexation, it is recommended that the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council establish the following requirements for compliance when development proceeds with any of the parcels included within the annexation area and which abut dedicated/proposed to be dedicated public right-of-ways: 1. Provide, by,dedication, 40 feet of right-of-way from the center- lines of Cloverdale Road and Franklin Road and 60 feet for Eagle Road to the parcel. Provide for half street improvements to Cloverdale, Eagle, and Franklin abutting/make deposit to the Public Road Trust Fund. 2. Provide, by dedication, 66 feet of right-of-way at the approxi- mate mid-section line of Section 9 for the Emerald -Pine exten- sion. Provide full improvement to the Emerald -Pine extension from Cloverdale 1/2 mile to the west. Provide half street improvement on the south side of Emerald -Pine plus 12 feet of paving on the north side for the remaining 1/2 mile to Eagle Road. 3. Provide, by dedication, 80 feet of right-of-way from the inter- section of Emerald -Pine with Cloverdale 400 feet to the west and from the intersection of Emerald -Pine with Eagle Road 400 feet to the east. • W.- 0 Meridian Planning and Zoning. Commission October 29, 1982 Page 2 4. Cloverdale, Eagle, Franklin, and the Emerald -Pine extension all have access restrictions. Access to be submitted for approval by the Ada County Highway District. 5. All dedicated streets to be constructed to Ada County Highway District standards and specifications. If there are any questions or should you desire further information, please call 344-6111, extension #920. Sincerely, ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Carol C. Kirby Development Services CK/dh ADA CCANTY HIGHWA CHARLES L. WINDER, PRESIDENT KARL JEPPESEN, VICE PRESIDENT LAWRENCE C. JACKSON, SECRETARY YD I4�-RICT q1o� 1 a October 29, 1982 318 E. 37TH STREET BOISE, IDAHO 83704 PHONE: 344-6111 Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meridian City Council 728 Meridian Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Dobaran ET AL Annexation North of Union Pacific Railroad and East of Eagle Road 184 Acres - "D" Industrial Dear Commission and Council Members, on October 28, The Ada County Highway t trictts annexation andsioners offers thein mfollowing comments/ 1982 reviewed the subject recommendations: The overall parcel straddles the U•ithinithedEagleaimpactuts lareadbut� Franklin, and Eagle Road. It lies outside the Eagle urban service planning area. Since the application is for annexation, and is recommended City hattheCouncil Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission establish the following requirements for compliance when development proceeds with any of the parcels included within the annexation area and which abut dedicated/proposed to be dedicated public right-of-ways: 1• Provide, by dedication, 40 feet of right-of-way from the center- feet lines of Cloverdale Road and Frafornhalf streetin Road nimp�ovementsrt Eagle Road to the parcel. Provide Cloverdale, Eagle, and Franklin abutting/make deposit to the Public Road Trust Fund. at the approxi - 2• Provide, by dedication, 66 feet of right-of-way _ mate mid-section line of Sectionto he for the EmeraldrPinePextension Sion. Provide full improve ment from Cloverdale 1/2 mile to the west. Provide hasflstreet eet of improvement on the south side of Emerald -Pine p paving on the north side for the remaining 1/2 mile to Eagle Road. 3. Provide, by dedication, 80 feet of right-of-way section of Emerald -Pine with Cloverdale 400 feet from the intersection of Emerald -Pine with Eagle to the east. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER from the inter - to the west and Road 400 feet OFFICIALS LAWANA L. NIEMANN, City Clerk A. M. KIEBERT, Treasurer RICHARD D. NICHOLS, Chief of Police BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN O. FITZGERALD, Attorney ROGER WELKER, Fire Chief EARL WARD, Waste Water Supt. 1 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 728 Meridian Street MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83842 Phone 888.4433 JOSEPH L. GLAISYER Mayor TO: LaWana Niemann, City Clerk FROM: Gary D. Smith, City Engineer , DATE: October 29, 1982 SUBJECT: Dobaran et al Annexation Request COUNCILMEN GRANT P. KINGSFORD BILL BREWER RICHARD F. ORTON, JR. RONALD R. TOLSMA ANNETTE C. HINRICHS Chairman Zoning & Planning At your request I have reviewed the legal description and attached drawing as submitted to you by Marsden & Associates for the subject annexation request. I have reviewed the legal descriptions as the applicant typed and submitted on the legal sizes sheets. Generally speaking, the metes and bounds descriptions do describe the property and are in general conformance with the map they submitted. Some inconsistencies do appear, however, and I have commented on those. A copy of their legal descriptions and map is attached with my comments thereon. GDS:dp Attachment DOBARAN ET AL ANNEXATION A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1. Marshall - Parcel 1: o Description is to section line in Cloverdale Road - okay - revise map to show it this way. o Should north boundary be shown above where it is drawn on the map? Otherwise other boundary lines don't look right. 2. Dobaran - Parcel 2: o West boundary must coincide with section line common to Sections 8 and 9 (existing City limits). o The "exception" in the description removes property, east of Commerce Park Subdivision, from inside the annexation boundary shown on the map. o The description says the S 1/2 of Section 9, except for the piece described as "excepted". This S 1/2 includes the Cook and VanAuker property. These two properties are thereby included twice in the annexation request. o Annexation request letter does not include a zone change request. What is the requested zone? 3. Cook - Parcel 3: o No annexation or zone change request attached to application. o Legal description includes VanAuker property thereby including it three times in the annexation request. 4. VanAuker - Parcel 4: o S89 -56-24W bearing (6601) along UPRR R/W - should this be N89 -56-24W? o N1 -03-34E bearing (6601) parallel to road R/W - should this be N1 -03-34W? 5. UPRR - Parcel 5: No comment. 6. Sallas - Parcel 6: 0 No zone change request shown on annexation request. A 7. Hollister - Parcels No. 7 & 8: o No zone or annexation request included in application. o What significance do the parcel numbers have as shown on the drawing? 8. J. R. Spencer - Parcel 9: o No zone change request with annexation authorization. 9. Idaho Power - Parcel 10: o No zone change or annexation request with application. 10. ACRD: o Include R/W on Eagle Road adjacent to Dobaran property. B. WATER o A 10" diameter water line is located on Locust Grove Road approxi- mately 7/8 mile west of Eagle Road. o City Well #11 is located in Locust Grove Industrial Park, approxi- mately 5/8 mile west of Eagle Road. o A significant extension would be required to serve this annexation request. C. SEWER o An 8" sewer line is located in Locust Grove Road approximately 7/8 mile west of Eagle Road. o A significant extension would be required to serve this annexation request. • , 184 Acw& DOBARAN ET AL ANNEXATION PARCEL #1 B$�¢� 7�►a� A tract of land in the S 1/2 NE 1/4 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an iron pipe marking the east one-quarter corner of Section 9, T. 3N.0 R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. Thence North along the section line, 394.70 feet to a point; Thence N. 89°34'51" W., 2680.87 feet to a steel pin on the north -south mid section line of said Section 9; Thence S. 0°34'15" W., along said mid-section line, 394.69 feet to a brass cap marking the center of said Section 9; Thence S. 89°34'51" E. along the east -west mid-section line, 2684.80 feet to the point of beginning. Said tract contains 24.31 acres more or less, subject to easements of record or in use, and subject to a road easement across the easterly 25 feet of the above-described tract which is presently occupied by Cloverdale Road and contains 9867 square feet (0.2265 acres) more or less. Together with all water and water rights, ditch and ditch rights appurtenant thereto. PARCEL #2 [�Sov%n*OE 0061& All that portion of the S 1/2 of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, lying North of the right-of-way and station grounds of the Oregon Shortline Railroad Company, in Ada County, State of Idaho. EXCEPTING THEREFROM: That portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 8, 9, 16, and 17 of T. 3N.31 R 1E., B.M.; thence North 1298.53 feet along the section line common to Sections 8 and 9; thence S. 89°56'24" East, 25 feet to a 5/8" iron pin on the North right-of-way line of the Union Pacific Railroad, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING: thence North 892.76 feet; thence South 86°41'48" East, 12.14 feet; thence North 1°12'18" East, 43.53 feet to the South right - of way line of the Settlers Canal; thence along the South right-of-way line of the Settlers Canal North 82°51'12" East, 54.03 feet; thence South 87°54'18" East, 435.75 feet; thence North 44°07'18" East, 12.31 feet; thence North 88°21'12" East, 220.15 feet; thence South 88°28'18" East 8 eet• thence 444 South 79029118" East. 181.13 feet; thence South 66°38'18" East, 511.24 feet; �' South r e t-of-wav i f the SPrtlnrc Cance thence South 0040130" East, J MAJ 692.32 feet along a line 20' West of and parallel to the center section line of Section 9, to a point on the North righ - - line of the Union Pacific Railroad; thence North 89°56'24" West 2664.44 feet along the North right-of-way line of the Union Pacific Railroa a real point of beginning, containing 52.35 acres. ' �h a Se�� „y, "; z�0� Together with all water, water rights, ditches and ditch rights, irrigation AIL Z 5If Z0f wells and pumps and the rights to the use of the same appurtenant thereto or used in connection therewith. D SAt skwu be North abcwt -t(000'. I $: C + � I N� ^� rte.. g. i • c A-43 00�o,Ayinwa PARCEL #3 Eig (.hd, 7,01e, CitWqt lLG 4 A parcel of land in the South one-half of Section 9, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M. Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described,as follows• re�ev�d 40 as ivaK, pipe im f an c g Commencing at an iron <EZrking the one-quarter corner common to Sections 9 and 10, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M.; thence South 89°10'09" West 25.00 feet to an iron rod on the West right-of-way line of a county road; thence along said right-of-way South 1°03'34" East 60.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: thence South 89°10'09" West 986.50 feet to a point; thence South 1°03'34" East 130.00 feet to a point; thence South 89°10109" West 408.52 feet to a point; thence South 1°03134" East 972.93 feet to a point; thence South 89°56'24" East 60.80 feet to a point; thence South 1°03'34" East 200.00 feet to a point on the North right-of-way lime of the Union Pacific Rail- road; thence along said right-of-way South 89°56'24" East 1,334.48 feet to an iron rod on the west right-of-way line of a county road; thence leaving said railroad right-of-way and continuing along said county road right-of-way North 1°03'34" West 1,324.62 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; containing 40.575 acres, more or less. Subject to any existing easements. PARCEL #4 [°�%A(Alee %du-s� " & Me) A parcel of land in the South one-half of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an iron rod marking the one-quarter corner common to Sections 9 and 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence South 89010'09" West 25.00 ft. to an iron rod on the West right-of-way line of a county road; thence along said right-of-way South 1"03'34" East 60.00 feet, thence Further South 1°03'34" East along the same West right-of-way line of a county road itional 1324.62 feet to a point on the North right-of-way line the Uni acific Railroad to the True Point o Beginning; thence D/L Z'24" &40s/�aouth 89°West along the North right-of-way line of the Union Pacific Railroad 660.00 feet a o ; thence North 1°03'34' East ne parallel to the West right-of-way line of a county road heretofore described 660.00 feet to a point; thence South 89°56'24" East along a line parallel to the North right-of-way of the Union Pacific Railroad 660.00 feet to a point of a county road; thence South 1003'34" South along same westerly right-of-way 660.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning, said parcel containing approximately 10.00 acres. PARCEL #5 Eiii) A parcel of land in the South one-half of Section 9, Township 3 -North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an iron rod marking the one-quarter corner common to Sections 9 and 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence South 89010'09" West 25.00 feet to an iron rod on the West right-of-way line of a county road; thence along said right-of-way South 1°03'34" East 60.00 Feet, thence PARCEL #5 - continued Further South 1°03134" East along the same West right-of-way line of a county road an additional 1324.62 feet to a point on the North right-of-way line of the Union Pacific Railroad to the True Point of Beginning; thence r t North 89056'24" Wes 2334.48 feet, more or less along the north boundary of Union Pacific Railway; thence South 0°03'36" West 50.00 feet; thence North 89056'24" West 359.48 feet more or less to a point on the midsection line; thence South 200 feet along the midsection line to the south boundary line of Union Pacific Railroad; thence South 89°56'24" East 2693.96 feet more or less along said south boundary to the west right-of-way line of Cloverdale Road; thence North 1°03'34" West 250.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL #6 C, �.1 !4121 E 5 S al.d. A � ` h (J i�M Q C 1 " 00 A parcel of land in the South half of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, in Ada County, State of Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, thence North 89035114" West along the South line of Section 9, which is the center line of Franklin Road, a distance of 1,419.30 feet to a point; thence North 0°20'17" East a distance of 25.00 feet, which point is the real point of beginning, thence North 0°20'17" East a distance of 1,011.24 feet to a point, which point is on th&Srtft-��bRounddary of the Union Pacific Railroad right of way thence SouthEast along said a distance of 216.02 feet to a point; thence sk4wv► Ltg o -Fir 1 �--- South 0020'17" West a distance of 1,008.26 feet to a point; thence North 89°35'14" West a distance of 216.0 feet to the real point of beginning. EXCEPT A strip of land for public right of way located in the sotith half of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 3, North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more specifically described to wit: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, thence C-4jNorth orth 89 9' 4" West along the South line of Section 9, which is the ne of Franklin Road a distance of 1,419,80 feet to a point; thence 0°20'17" East a distance of 25 feet to the real point of beginning, thence continuing North 0020'17" East 15 feet to a point; thence South 89°35'14" East parallel to the South section line 216 feet to a point; thence South 0°20'17" West 15 feet to a point; thence North 89035114" West 216 feet to the real point of beginning. PARCEL #7 and pAgCEL #S -77vv� Hloi..w Part of the SE 1/4 of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, Ada Count. Idaho, more particularlypdescribe as follows: "06 d as 17 /- o3 - w, �- aA cc l Y Beginning at t corner common to Section 9, 10, 15 and 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 of the Boise Meridian; thence Nort °06'45 West, 25 feet; thence North 89035114" West, 25 feet to a point, which point is 25 feet West of the existing centerline of Cloverdale Road as now constructed and 25 feet North of the existing centerline of Franklin Road as now constructed; thence continuing North 89035'14" West along a lin744.80 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence UnA" '-MA G ►VVL North 0020'17" East, 1002.27 feet to a point; thence North 88047147" West a distance of 433.54 feet to a point; thence t PARCEL #7 & PARCEL #8 - Continued South 0020'17" West, 1008.26 feet to a of the existing centerline of Franklin South 89°35'14" East, 433.5 feet to the point, which point is 25 feet North Road as now constructed thence REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following described parcel of land; A Strip of land for public right-of-way located in the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15, and 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence North 0°06'45" West 25 feet; thence North 89°35'14" West 25 feet to a point, which point is 25 feet West of the existing center line of Cloverdale Road as now constructed and 25 feet North of the existing center line of Franklin Road as now constructed; thence continuing North 89°35'14" West along a line 744.80 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence No2#�0'17" ' " East 15 feet to a point; thence No47'47' West a distance of 433.5 feet to a point; thence West 15 feet to a point, which point is 25 feet North of the sting center line of'Franklin Road as now constructed; thence Sout 9° 5'14" East 433.5 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING 2'000 , PARCEL #9 Part of the SE4 of Section 9, T. 3 N., R. 1 E., B.M., Ada County,, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at,the corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15 and 16, T. 3 N., R. '1 E., B.M,; thence North 0006'45" East, 25 feet to a point; thence North 890 35' 14" West, 25 feet to a point, which point',s 25 feet- west of the existing center line of Cloverdale Road as now constructed and 25 feet North of the centerline of Franklin Road as now constructed, the Real Point of Beginning; thence North 89035'14" West along a line 744.80 feet to a point; thence North 0°20'17" East, 410.46 feet to a point; thence in an Easterly direction 743.20 feet to a point; thence South 0006'45" West 410.46 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. EXCEPT: Part of the SE4 of Section 9, T. 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15 and 16, T. 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence North 0°06145" East 25 feet to a point; thence North 89035114" West 25 feet to a point, which point is 25 feet West of the existing center line of Cloverdale Road as now constructed and 25 feet North of the center line of Franklin Road as now constructed, the Real Point of Beginning; thence North 89035'14" West along a line 412.00 feet to a point; thence North 0006127" East 410.46 feet to a point; thence South 89038'43" East 412.10 feet to a point; thence South 0006145" West 410.46 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. PARCEL #9 - Continued ALSO EXCEPT: A strip of land for quarter of Section described to -wit: 11 public right-of-way located in the southeast 9, T. 3 N, R. 1 E. B.M., more specifically Beginning at the corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15 and 16, T. 3 N., R. 1 E., B.M.,; thence North 0°06'45" East 25 feet to a point; thence North 89035'14" West 25 feet to a point; which point is 25 feet West of the East section line of said Section 9 and 25 feet North of the South line of Section • thence North 89035114" West along a line 412 eet to the Real Point of Yc+rioUsl Beginning; thence continuing d&3 h4� - = % , J'6F" � North 89035114" West along a lin 341. feet to a point; thence Cr°e +� North 0120117" East 15 feet to a poin ; thence C�lSCP. South 89°35114" East 341.5 feet to a point; thence South 0020'17" West 15 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. PARCEL #10 CY10 ( 9e ®✓/dory. ?e"tsi) Part of the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4) of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the corner common to Section 9, 10, 15 and 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence North 0°06145" East, 25 feet to a point; thence North 89°35'14" West, 25 feet to a point, which point is 25 feet West of the existing center line of Cloverdale Road as now constructed and 25 feet North of the center line of Franklin Road as now constructed, the Real Point of Beginning; thence North 89°35'14" West along a line, 412 feet to a point; thence North 0°06127" East 410.46 feet to a point; thence South 89°38143" East 412.10 feet to a point; thence South 0°06'45" West 410.46 feet to the Real Point of Beginning, with all improvements thereon and together with all water and water rights, ditch and ditch rights thereunto belonging or appertaining. This parcel of land contains 3.88 acres more or less. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT - Franklin'Road and part of Cloverdale Road South of the Union Pacific Railroad A parcel of land in the South half of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, in Ada County, State of Idaho more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, thence North 89°35'14" West along the South line of Section 9, which is the center line of Franklin Road, a distance of 1,419.30 feet to a point; thence North 0020'17" East a distance of 40.00 feet, thence South 89°35'14" East 1386.3 feet more or less to a point 33 feet West of the centerline of Cloverdale Road, thence North 0°06'45" East 395.46 feet more or less along the west right-of-way line of Cloverdale Road, thence East 33 feet to a point on the centerline of Cloverdale Road, thence South 0°06'45" West 435.46 feet more or less to the point of beginning ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT - Cloverale Road North of the South boundary of Union Pacific Railroad A parcel of land in the South one-half of Section 9, T 3N., R. lE., B.M. Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an iron rod marking the one-quarter corner common to Sections 9 and 10, T. 3N., R. lE., B.M.; thence South 89°10'09" West 25.00 feet to an iron rod on the West right-of-way line of a county road; thence along said right-of-way South 1°03'34" East 1634.62 feet more or less thence North 89°10'09" East 25.00 feet to a point on the centerline of Cloverdale Road, thence North 1°03'34" West 1634.62 feet more or less to the point of beginning The foregoing descriptions were obtained from public records in Ada County and are subject to future boundary surveys. Metes and bounds descriptions have not been field checked. nA -" 0 z "nay m' � -+ CD C z n a 3 3 n mc o °�° w �a c., r- r c c, ]s v c z °' on o: CL -s A o m o �+ °�' v to �_ 3 cn �C w _. C w w ra+ N g- fD 3 N C+ W R C S r+ -��- O th pi i r+ f�' 3 O e+ -5 -+• CD N e+ O 2 ;- -4 Gf O fD r+ 'S O c+ O d c+ --+ A C 7 c 7 p -r m 3' X, 2 S r?D o oo to o 0 m o ws H �. rD rJD r. m w C -+. C+ 2 N S N -1 m r+ (/! O d O z in CL CA 4r+Gni O O � 'S :3 CD lD A (A fD w e+ w a, O fD of Z O D �• S C+ 'D A tgp d O 0 Q �• f�D R1 N 0- CD A -� O O 'c e+ .�. et cC 0003 s2o n 3 A -n O M e+ �. . a C CA C+ o co 0 0 ;a w H m C+ r1i OD N n -r SG C �. N cr -n C-) m O 'a -+�C f3D = rn m A C ® z tyn C+ �-+ w D r o om(A Co a ;o >>0 � m r+ i v+ O t x �.. C") c. -s < w rn oo a a z o a z r+ A O 0-4 � o CL = CD o- z o �. .) N � a n \1 a IA 3E M w N N N w (� J O M (D C.O O CL fD w -s CL �-. no e+ at fD =o"+ CL .�� N (CD r+ Z a nA0 Z o m m N m. I I I S Z rn C2 fu CA b-4 1t r.= • • o � n . = LA Z � � O CL L7 c z � v+ I w m C. M M O w O O fD a ti �° "1 11 �c w c ma z � � w O n CL CL a �'. CA c of o C++ o�u 3c* � e'+ > > 3 e+ '= �. fD •f v CL i r+ O CL e'1' v 3 J• J• N =r M O cT CL N O A O N w c J. C+ S to = 1� < -1 of � -+• C+ O << m O o 0 w A A O tG _ C.+ 3 CD -+• CD A OA fOD `n 3V+o no a co C+ •'i w �. 7 ea+ rn c+ C+ v .. (A 3 J• ? c+ -0 A S cZ w O -s -1 e+ m 3 v - A. m I N CL m A —+ O y 'a e+ .+. C'+ -+• CD to D A '! Qo J. Z O CD c+ V1 C+ OCD N �. O O w O m e•+ F.J n ..I N 'K CD 'rf n m v w m IT I 1�1 I I I I I I OD m OD e- A J Chu H v' COD -Ct s > > v N N e�y W 7C CL S '0C* •-i C* =* C + O CD J• O t0 w •..) fi7 O A � � � w _ CL z N a-ago,- 0 c cocro fD N CD t+ -•�• (n N > > O CL 'f 00 = ,+m rD CL w .,�. O Ci H �cr -00 w a► C+ a no -tCt N O � CL.e N CCp �: lot EY v I� 3 o m m S Z rn C2 fu CA b-4 1t o � n Z � � CL L7 c z � v O c ti CL o z w z � � n •1 O (D v (D a M J• CD •f v CL 00 v 3 N 00 e+ cT N 0 rt v 1� 5. We will require more data concerning the depth of (high seasonal ground water)(solid lava) from original grade before we can comment concerning individual sewage dis- posal. 6. We can approve this proposal for individual sewage dis- posal to be located (2,4) feet above high seasonal ground water, 4 feet above solid lava layers. 7. We can approve this proposal for:, Central sewage _Interim sewage _Individual sewage and-CCentral water _Individual water _Community water well. R- - 50 t br0E 195 -[T lKa y G�e&Wope - 8. Plans for _Community sewage Sewage dry lines, and _Central water _Community water must be submitted to and approved by the Regional Health and Welfare Environmental Services Office. 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 10. This department would recommend deferral until high season- al ground water can be determined it other considerations indicate approval. 11. l� W WIA Reviewef by: Date CENTRAL OTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Review Sheet Return to: Boise Rezone #_ _ Eagle Conditional use #9-��� Meridian Preliminary/Final/Short Plat Kuna A C Z 1. We have no objections to this I eho • p 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal. 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. 5. We will require more data concerning the depth of (high seasonal ground water)(solid lava) from original grade before we can comment concerning individual sewage dis- posal. 6. We can approve this proposal for individual sewage dis- posal to be located (2,4) feet above high seasonal ground water, 4 feet above solid lava layers. 7. We can approve this proposal for:, Central sewage _Interim sewage _Individual sewage and-CCentral water _Individual water _Community water well. R- - 50 t br0E 195 -[T lKa y G�e&Wope - 8. Plans for _Community sewage Sewage dry lines, and _Central water _Community water must be submitted to and approved by the Regional Health and Welfare Environmental Services Office. 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 10. This department would recommend deferral until high season- al ground water can be determined it other considerations indicate approval. 11. l� W WIA Reviewef by: Date y) f%3to S 00-1 L co C. CL �a J N 3 o .. r. 1 tC a J O+ O CL O 7 tC 0 000 C O CL rn << <c a s S tD O �+ C M O+ fl C �• . 0) t+ O d N N ZE !L m N CL O c� � A C C" O Z N e+ 0 O 3 O N as � �• C., J J. cr N cD s n cu C+ N 'm it 01 tD 1 -ua tD �N N C 3 O C+ CL -i 00 C fD d. C+ .a �• N 7 O cr mo N t+ �• s o• -s CCD. O H 7 ew 11 • 9 Sy I gm f mm an0 b m in G m� �vl t 00 ,p W 7v ao G7 c.. W r 7 Q' m n J tD O C+ N 3 W =rt -h NO fD A c v Cl = O a Is CL •Y cu C+ N 'm it 01 tD 1 -ua tD �N N C 3 O C+ CL -i 00 C fD d. C+ .a �• N 7 O cr mo N t+ �• s o• -s CCD. O H 7 ew 11 • 9 Sy I gm f mm an0 b m in G m� �vl t 00 ,p MERI D1AN FIRE br% PT i N O CT13 E � ►981 W E-y8o� t 1:AIRV IEW AV51 3900 E-4000 I4APPY ACS; ouT TN Moa COMMERCIR C�u2T F RAN K41 N ROA KING of EVEN Cu.►es FPawFL w ADoffssES C] E-4 So KDUST MEP10IAN 1 F m s 0 ro _KEYEN �Nb ofE-44 10 PARK FA4R�S►��1 i A�DR,65t= E-4 O "Mm Ono stag �� MEIZ%O'AN e \} � ±< .�� 2 »� /\ . \ At »�7 ? 0 /\�\ / HYbRA14'r `3 SN AM%kice H: rri r hr► c ►.. _ 1a1�! U, t"y t�fYtr3h_�� IPIMIC C•11�'J�ra,fil�t CC? U n ow 4w ow MW am �� o e i KLAI D^ y W z i � � J �U { ® '7'`MIt.E l =Cll 9 2 C ce LA.5. CIA VW� CAT IN 4335 4331 }i 1 O .J h oa.i�o Z Q 'E-48� 9 1M� I�IC�4 Ul 1 0 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning & Zoning Commission will hold a special meeting on January 24,1983, at 8:00 o'clock p.m., at the City Hall, Citi of Meridian, 723 -Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho, for the purpose of considering the Comprehensive Plan Amendments submitted to the City by Al Marsden and for the purpose of considering the Dcbaran,, et al. Annexation to the City of Meri(Han. No public comment will be taken at the above scheduled special meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian. DATED this/0—h day of January, 1983. AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridien, Idaho 83842 Telephone 8884461 n,/city Crier • • NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning & Zoning Commission will hold a special meeting on January 5, 1982, at 8:00 o'clock p.m., at the City Hall, City of Meridian, 728 Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho, for the purpose of holding a workshop on the Dobaran et.al Annexation. No public comment will be taken at the above scheduled special meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian. DATED this 15th day of December, 1982. AM�lSdt� AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridian, Idaho 83842 Telephone 8884481 NOTICE OF PUBLIC I-iEARINC Legal notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of . Meridian and laws of the State of Idaho, that the Meridian City Planning & Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on December 13, 1982, at 8:00 o'clock p.m., at the Meridian City Hall, 723 Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the purposes of said meeting are as follows: 1. meridian Comprehensive Plan Amendments submitted by Alvin S. Mars den : To hear and take all testimony., oral or written, which shall be presented and submitted at said time pertaining to the below described proposed amendments to the Meridian Comprehensive Plan; and further to consider the proposed amendments to the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and to consider whether said amendments merit further stur_'y by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Summary of the proposed amendments to the 1eridian Comprehensive Plan: JA) Extend the Urban Service Planning Area to the centerline of Cloverdale Road. (B) Designate the area adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad west of Cloverdale Road as Industrial. (C) Designate the area west of Cloverdale Road and north and south of I-84 as an Interchange Enterprise Area. (D) Designate Cloverdale Road as a major arterial. 2. Dobaran et al. Annexation: To hear and take testimony, oral or written, which shall AMBROSE, FMGERALD be presented and submitted at said time, or as soon thereafter & CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridian, Idaho 8W2 Telephone 8884481 as said subject can be heard, pertaining to annexing and zoning of the following described properties commonly referred to as the Dobaran Annexation property; and further to consider annexing and zoning the following described property and to take action on making recommendations pertaining to said annexation and zoning to the City Council of the City of Meridian, and further, to make recommendations as to necessary changes in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning and Development Ordinance which may or may not be necessary as a result of annexing said property. The properties are hereafter described and proposed to be zoned "D" Industrial: MARSHALL ANNEXATION: A tract of land in the S 1/2 NE 1/4 of Section 9, T. 39., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. DOBARAN ANNEXATION: All that portion of the S 1/2 of Section 9,'T. 3N., R. lE., B.M., lying, North of the right--of-way and station grounds of the Oregon Shortline Railroad Company, in Ada County, Idaho. EXCEPTING THEREFROM a portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 91 T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. COOK ANNEXATION: A parcel of land in the S 1/2 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. VAN AUKER ANNEXATION: A parcel of land in the S 1/2 of Section 9 -,T. -3N., R. lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. UNIO14 PACIFIC RAILROAD ANNEXATION: A parcel of land in the S 1/2 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. SALLAS ANNEXATION: A parcel of land in the S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. HOLLISTER ANNEXATION: Part of the SE 1/4 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. SPENCER ANNEXATION: Part of the SE.1/4 of Section 9, T. 3N., . l RE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. IDAHO POWER ANNEXATION: Part of the SE 1/4 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ANNEXATION: A parcel of land in the S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridian, Idaho 83842 Telephone 888-4461 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Legal notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and laws of the State of Idaho, that the Meridian City Planning & Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on November 3, 1932 at 3:00 P.M., at the Meridian City Hall, for the purpose of considering annexing and zoning the property known as Dobaran, et al, Annexation. The properties are hereinafter described and proposed to be zoned "D" INDUSTRIAL: MARSHALL ANNEXATION: A tract of land in the S 1/2 NE 1/4 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, DOBARAN ANNEXATION: All that portion of the S 1/2 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., lying North of the right-of-way and station grounds of the Oregon Shortline Railroad Company, in Ada County, Idaho. EXCEPTING THEREFROM a portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. COOK ANNEXATION: A parcel of land in the S 1/2 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County,, Idaho. VAN AUKER ANNEXATION: A parcel of land in the S 1/2 of Section 9,II'' T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD ANNEXATION: A parcel of land in the S 1/2 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. SALLAS ANNEXATION: A parcel of land in the S 1/2 of the SE 1/4, of Section 9, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. HOLLISTER ANNEXATION: Part of the SE 1/4 of Section 9, T. 3N,, R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. SPENCER ANNEXATION: Part of the SE 1/4 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. IDAHO POWER ANNEXATION: Part of the SE 1/4 of Section 9, T.U., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ANNEXATION: A parcel of land in the S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. More particular descriptions of each of the above described parcel: can be seen during regular business hours at the Office of the Cita AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Telephone 8881461 AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridien, Idaho 83842 Telephone 888-4481 Clerk, City of Meridian, 728 Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho, al a map of the entire parcel proposed for annexation is on file at the Office of the City Clerk, City of Meridian. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said hearing. DATED This 15th day of October, 1982. Meridian City ]Planning & Zoning Commission 1� u a ana L. N3. nn� C ty Clerk More Particular descriptions of each of the above described parcels can be seen during regular business hours at the Office of the City Clerk, Dity of Meridian, 728 Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said hearing. DATED this J-1 day of November, 1982. Meridian City Planning & Zoning Commission Chairperson .G�J1t (I;it�—Clrk AMBROSE, FITZGERALD & CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Meridien, Idaho 83842 Telephone 888.4481 OFFICIALS LAWANA L. NIEMANN, City Clerk A. M. KIEBERT, Treasurer RICHARD D. NICHOLS, Chief of Police BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN O. FITZGERALD, Attorney ROGER WELKER, Fire Chief EARL WARD, Waste Water Supt. • HUB OF TREASURE 17 ALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 728 Meridian Street MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83842 Phone 88&4433 JOSEPH L. GLAISYER Mayor Mr. Alvin S. Marsden Marsden & Associates P.O. Box 771 Boise,Idaho 83701 COUNCILMEN GRANT P. KINGSFORD BILL BREWER RICHARD F. ORTON, JR. RONALD R. TOLSMA ANNETTE C. HINRICHS Chairman Zoning ✓£ Planning January 25,1983 R.E.: Comprehensive Plan AmPridment Request on Behalf of Property Owners Dobaran et al. Dear Al, At a special meeting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission held January 24, 1983 at the Meridian City Hall the application for the proposed ame...ndient to the Meridian Comprehensive Plan by Marsden & Associates representing property owners of Dobaran et al. was denied. This decision may be appealed as stated in paragraph e, page 63 of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and #14 of the Conclusions. Sincerely, For Meridian Planning Zoningssion ck fi 2^� - - ity Cler Enclosure: Pg.63 Comp Plan. #14 Conclusions a w e. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall determine whether the application merits further study. All applicants shall be notified of the Commission's decision by mail. Any applicant aggrieved of this decision will have thirty (30) days from the date of notification to appeal this decision to the City Council by filing a written appeal stating the reasons for the appeal. The City Council may direct the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider any application previously rejected which the City Council, by a majority vote, deems to warrant further study. f. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold one or more public work sessions to consider those applications warranting further study. g. In October and April of each year, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing to consider all of the applications ac- cepted by it for further study by February 1st and August 1st. The Planning and Zoning Commission, after receiving the report of its committee and taking public testimony, shall consider each application on its own merit and in relation to each other application and, within thirty (30) days, shall recommend to the City Council approval or denial of each application, unless (upon written agreement of the applicant) the application is held over for consideration during the next six-month interval. h. Upon receipt of the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendations on Comprehensive Plan amendments the City Council will set a date for public hearing of the applications. At the public hearing, the proposed amendments will be presented and the City Council will receive the report of its Committee and public testimony on each application. i. Following the public hearing, the City Council will approve or deny each application (except that with the written agreement of the ap- plicant, an additional amount of time, which shall be specified, may be taken). All applicants shall be notified by mail of the City Council's decision. j. All applications for Comprehensive Plan Amendments shall be acted upon by the City Council within sixteen (16) months from their date of filing unless, upon written agreement of the applicant, an additional amount of time may be specified, or unless the provisions of Section (k) are applicable requiring additional time for study. k. Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan may be granted only to correct an error in the Plan or because of substantial change in the actual condi- tions of an area which results in a material discrepancy or disparity between the conditions in the area and all or part of the Plan. If the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that a study of the proposed application or conditions affecting the proposed application is necessary, and the necessary funds for such a study are not available, the.application may be tabled (for a one-year period) to allow the budgeting of the -nece- ssary funds for the study, unless the applicant agrees to pay in advance the estimated cost of the study. 4 AMBROSE, FITZGERALD S CROOKSTON 11. That even disregarding the Area or Impact problem, the Commission ncludes that, in light of its prior recommendation to the City Council to extend the USP., boundary approximately 1/2 mile east of Eagle load, the further extension of the USPA boundary another 1/2 mile to the east would not be prudent without sufficient assurances that the area could be sewered with the present capacity of the sewage treatment plant, or an expansion thereof, and that sufficient water could be supplied for industrial and fire fighting purposes. 12. Additionally, the problems of police and fire protection in the event and likelihood of annexation were not sufficiently addressed, particularly in light of the Dobaran Annexation —application which has been filed by the applicant in conjunction with this application to amend the 1978 Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 13. The Amendment Provision and Procedures of the 1978 Comprehensive Plan states that the Commission shall take an application for amendment, hold at least one public hearing and determine whether the application merits further study. If the Commission determines that the application does not merit further study, that is, the application is denied, the Commission shall so notify the applicant by mail and the applicant shall have 30 days within which to appeal the decision 'to the City Council. if the Commission determines the application merits further study, it shall hold at least one additional public hearing and then recom- mend to the City Council approval or denial. 14. The Commission concludes and determines that the applica- tion of Alvin S. Marsden for amendment of the 1978 Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as set out in the application, does not merit further study; that the applicant may appeal this decision and these findings of fact and conclusions to the City Council within 30 days from the date of notification of this decision. • e AMBROSE, FITZGERALD 3 CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O. BOX 427 Meridien. Idaho 83842 Telephone 888.4481 • I • APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT BY ALVIN S . MARSEN ON BEHALF OF DOBARAN, ET AL. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS FINDINGS OF FACT 1. This -application for amendment to the 1978 Meridian Comprehensive Plan was submitted by Alvin S. Marsden as the applicant on behalf of. Dobaran et al.; the application was received October 14, 1982, by the Meridian City Clerk; that a public hearing as required by the Local Land Use Planning Pact could not be scheduled until December 13, 1982, due to a lack of a quorum on the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission. 2. That the applicant requests amendment to the 1978 Feridi Comprehensive Plan in the following particulars: Extend the Urban Service Planning Area (USDA) centerline of Cloverdale .Road. A. to the B. Designate the area adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad west of Cloverdale as Industrial. d north C. Designate the area wesn InterchandelEnterpre Road ise Area. and South of 1-84 as a g D. Designate Cloverdale Road as a major arterial. 3. That a public hearing was held on December 13, 1982, concerning the proposed amendment; that notice of said hearing was! published fifteen days prior to hearing as required by law; that said hearing was open to the public; that the Planning and Zoning Commission held a special meeting workghop on January 5, 1983, to consider the proposed amendment which special meeting workshop was duly noticed by publication prior to the special meeting; that notices of both meetings were available to papers, radio and television stations. f A � AMBROSE, FITZGERALD & CROOKSTON Attomeys and Counselors P.O. Box 427 Mmidlan, Idaho 83842 Telephone 8884461 is • The west boundary being the Ada -Canyon County line; the north boundary being Highway 20; the east boundary being Cloverdale Road until such point as Cloverdale reaches the Interstate -Overland Area, then including the Five - Mile, Eight -Mile and Ten -Mile Creek Drainage areas, but in no event shall it extend east past Cole Road or the New York Canal, whichever closest; Rawsonbounded to the thesouth being generally following .the point it intersects with the Ada -Canyon County line. However, the Area of Impact has not been negotiated, as required by 67-6526, Idaho Code, by the City of Meridian and Ada County or the City of Boise; that Ada County has not adopted the Meridian Area of Impact by means of an Ordinance. -9. That Ada County has adopted the -Boise City Area of Impact by means of County Ordinance 126; that said Area of Impact o£ the -City of Boise extends at least to the quarter section line west of Cloverdale Raod; thus, the duly adopted Area of Impact of the City of Boise overlaps at least a --quarter of a mile onto the Area of Impact of the City of.Meridian which has only been adopted by the City of Meridian, but not by Ada County. 10. That a large portion of the land where the applicant proposes Meridian's USPA be extended to is now included in the Area of Impact of the City of Boise. 11. That the application sets forth as the one overriding sic nificant change which has occurred and which results in a material descrepancy between the 1978 Comprehensive Plan and present existing conditions is the proposed construction of an interstate interchange at I-84 and Cloverdale Road; that the application for amendment is basically grounded and based upon the addition of the interchange at Cloverdale Road. 12. That the applicant, in testimony and the application, indicated that the intended development included in the area which the proposed extension of the USPA would include would be indus- trial; that the City of Meridian now has within its City limits L „ r Road, one in the planning stage at I-84 and Eagle Road, and one in the planning stage- at I -B4 and Cloverdale Road; that at the time of the adoption of the 1978 Meridian Comprehensive Plan, there was only the one interchange at Meridian Road. 17. That it is the goal of the Commission to encourage regional enterprises; that regional.enterprises require and tend to locate where there are sufficient transportation facilities such as railway and freeway access; that Meridian has in its Area of Impact, as adopted by Meridian but not -'approved by Ada County, three, one at Meridian Road, and two under planning at Eagle Road and Cloverdale Road; that the best possible locations for regional enterprises are at freeway interchanges where access to the freeway -is the best; that the' -City of Boise and Ada County now have, however, included the Cloverdale Interchange Enterprise_Area within the Boise Area of Impact. 18. That the present capacity of the Meridian Sewage Treat- ment Facility is for a population equivalent to 21,000; that current utilization -is a population equivalence of 7,000; that the plant has the capability�of being expanded to serve an approximate TefeDhor* 888011 population equivalence of 42,000; that in order to serve all the annexed property in the City of Meridian, the sewer treatment plant would have to have a capacity of approximately 50,000 population equivalence; that not all annexed property would require sewer one time; to allow growth, either residential, commer- service at cial, or industrial, additional -means of treating sewage will have to be developed, publicly or privately, to compliment service by the existing plant. _ 19. That water service to the land in the proposed extension AMBROSE, the USPA could be handled by means of additional wells; that a FITZGERALD of a CROOKSTON Attomep rh _ y . $' Vic, 4 ldeTldietl,» r a yca s .,1N TefeDhor* 888011 AMBROSE, FITZGERALD BCROOKSTON Attomep and Counselors P.O. Box JIV Meridian, Idatw 83842 -"etephoneOBS4481 25. That the Amendment would have little affect on housing since there already is an abundance of available building lots. 26. There would be no impact on hazardous .areas or special - areas or recreation due to the Amendment and the Commission felt there was no comment necessary on natural resources. 27. The Amendment would have no, or at least minimal, affect on the soils. 28. The Community design would not be significantly changed. 29. That there was no public input on the proposed amendment. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the requirements of the 1978 meridian Comprehen- sive Plan Amendment Provision and Procedures and of the Local Land Use Planning Act, Title 67, Chapter 65, 'Idaho 'Code, including all notice requirements and planning considerations have been met; that l! the requirements of Section,_67-6508, Idaho 'Code, have been conside ed. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan is designed for the planning of the City of Meridian and its Area�x)f Impact as adopted in Ordinance No. 319. 3. That the 1978 Meridian Comprehensive Plan was adopted pursuant to the Local Land Use Planning Act, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and all requirements of that act have been met and -r•- were complied with. 4. That in considering any amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, the goals and policies of the present plan must be looked to and considered; that all such goals and policieshavebeen con- sidered; that -the following listed goals and policies are consideref to be of utmost importance in the present application for amend- 4. Uses in the rural areas of the Urban Service Planning Area not scheduled for urban services (municipal sewer and water facilities and other essential services) should be maintained in agricultural use until such land has been identified as part of a City capital improvement program for development. 5. That the above goals and policies, particularly that support should.be given to existing industrial areas and that industrial development within the City limits should receive the highest priority, in -conjunction with the finding that there are already over 800 acres of industrial zoned property within the City limits, a significant amount of....:whi.ch is undeveloped, dictate that the USPA should not be extended any further to the east and -that the area adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad west of Cloverdale Road should not be designated as Industrial. 61:1 That the Commission may take judicial notice of State laws, City and County Ordinances-, and economic conditions and of governmental actions, policies, .arid decisions, including its own, and may consider knowledge obtained in considering prior amend- ments and duplication is to be avoided; that the Commission specifically takes notice of the Dobaran Annexation application which includes land extending to .-Cloverdale Road. 7. That no public --need for or benefit from the proposed amendment was shown significant enough to warrant the adoption of the amendment; that the'repre-sentations as to public need were -- speculative and based in large part upon the proposed construction of an interchange at I-84 and Cloverdale Road, which will be dis cussed below. B. That the applicant maintains that one significant -change has occurred within the Area of Impact which is a material change 11. That even disregarding the Area of. Impact problem, the Commission concludes that, ,in light .of its prior recommendation to the City Council to extend the USPA boundary approximately 1/2 mile east of Eagle Road, the further extension of the USPA boundary another 1/2 mile to the east would not be prudent,without sufficient assurances that the area could be sewered with the present capacity of the sewage treatment plant, or an expansion thereof, and that sufficient water could be supplied _.for industrial and Fire fighting purposes. 12. Additionally, the problems of police and fire protgction in the event and likelihood of annexation were not sufficiently addressed, -particularly in light of the Dobaran Annexation applica- tion which.bas been filed by the applicant in conjunction with,. this applicat on to amend the 197.8 Meridian fComprehens ve Plan-,.,, 13. The Amendment Provision .and Procedures of 'the `3978 Comprehensive Plan states that the Commission shall take an application for amendment, hold....at least one public hearing and determine whether the application merits further study. If the Commission determines that the application does not merit further study, that is, the application is denied, the Commission shall so notify the applicant by mail. and the applicant shall have 30 days within which to appeal the .decision to the City Council. If - the Commission.determines the application merits further study, it shall hold at least one additional public hearing and then recom- mend to the City Council approval or denial. 14. The Commission concludes and determines that the appli- cation of Alvin S. Marsden on behalf of Dobaran, et al. for amendment to the 1978 .Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as set out in h— s' v-, Special Meeting Meridian Planning & Zoning January 5, 1983 Special Meeting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission called to order by Chairman Bob Spencer at 8:10 p.m. Members Present: Marnell Chenowith; Tom Eddy; Bob Giesler Members Absent: Gerry Sweet Others Present: Al Marsden; Gary Smith; Wayne Crookston, Jr.; Jack H. Niemann Wayne Crookston, Jr., City Attorney, explained to the Commission that he and his partner have represented the Dobarans in the past and may represent them in the future. Crookston informed the Commision that they have done no work on the property in question or on the annexation request or.the request for the admendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Crookston presented a document to the Commission waiving any conflict of interest by him or his partner, signed by the Dobarans. (Document on File with these Minutes) Crookston stated that if the Commission felt there would be a conflit of interest on the annexation natter, someone else could advise them. Spencer encouraged the Commission to allow the City Attorney to continue to advise them on the an,iexation request Ly Dobaran et al. Spencer stated that he could not foresee any problems. The motion was made by Chenowith and seconded by Giesler to allow the City Attorney, Wayne Crookston, Jr., to continue to represent and advise the City of Meridian on all matters pertaining to the Dobaran et al Annexation, and request for admendment to the Comp. Plan, that the Commission believes that there is no conflict of interest, and that the Commission waive any conflict in that area. Motion Carried: Chenowith, yea; Eddy, yea; Giesler, yea Chairman Bob Spencer opened the meeting for a question and answer session to discuss the Comprehensive Plan Admendment request. Spencer explained that the City Attorney, Wayne Crookston, and the City Engineer, Gary Smith, were present .to answer and questions pertaining to the Comprehensive Plan Admendment request that the Commission might have. City Attorney Wayne Crookston commented that the application for the annexation and the request for the Comprehensive Plan Admendment both meet all the requirements by the City. Crookston stated however that he felt that there was significant difference in the request for the Plan Admendment from the Comprehensive Plan Admendment concerning the Quong Watkins Annexation, in the fact that the request for the admendment was initated by a private party. The Admendment to the Comprehensive Plan concerning the Quong Watkins Annexation was initated by the Commission itself. Crookston stated that the amendment to the Comprehensiv Plan must be made before the annexation request can be granted. Spencer questioned City Engineer Smith on the impact on the Sewer and Water facilities of the City. Smith explained that any Industrial development has a low impact on the sewer facilities and that the water facilities would relate to fire protection. Smith: "The main concern is the surrounding areas that will be served by extending the water and sewer lines." Smith stated that the adjacent properties to the annexation must be considered initally als There was discussion concerning the water/sewer service area study that was completed by Quong/Watkins, and if this line would be big enought to serve both developments. (Tape on File, City Clerk's Office) Spencer stated to the Commission that he had Vernon Schoen, City Building Inspector, do research on existing Industrial Development Zoning. Spencer said that there were presently 416 acres of property in the City zoned Industrial. Of these, 1,4550 feet is RailRoad frontage. This is property that has been annexed but has not had any development on it. Special Meeting Meridian Planning & Zoning 2. January 5, 1983_1 Commission Member Bob Giesler commented that not all of the property in question is in the Meridian Rural Fire District. Giesler: "1/2 of that property is in the Cole/Collister Fire District." City Attorney, Wayne Crookston: "If the City annexes property, the fire boundaries would automatically change." There was much discussion concerning the fire ratings. (Tape on File City Clerk's Office) Marsden explained to the Commission that he is requesting an admendment to the Comprehensiv plan to extend the Urban Service Planning Area to the edge of Cloverdale. It was explained that the Urban Service Planning Area is the area that the City is suppose to be able to service. City Engineer Smith stated that the capacity of the City Sewer is approximately 68% in the SuTuner. Smith said that it is his concern and the concern of the Wastewater Plant Superintendent Earl Ward, that they have a "new" sewer treatment plant and are all ready talking of expansion. There was discussion concerning the procedure for admendment to the Comprehensive Plan. (Tape on File; City Clerks' Office) Chairman Bob Spencer instructed City Attorney Wayne Crookston to draw up the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Crookston stated that he would present some propsed findings. Crookston said that he would try to have them prepared for the meeting to be held Monday, January 10, 1983. Chairman Spencer stated that once the decision was made on the Comprehensive Plan Admendment the Commission would proceed to act on the Annexation request. The Motion was -made by Eddy and seconded by Giesler to adjourn at 10:00 p.m. Motion Carried: Chenowith, yea; Giesler, yea; Eddy, yea; Special meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission held on January 5, 1983 adjourned at 10:00 p.m. (Tapes on File; City Clerks' Office, Meridian City Hall) APPROVED: BOB SPENCER, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: JACK H. NIEMANN, CITY CLERK pc: Mayor & Council (5) P & Z Commixxion (5) City Clerk, City Building Inspector City Engineer, City Treasurer Bruce Stuart, Earl Ward., City Attorney Chief of Police, Gus Hein, FireDept. Valley News, Press Tribune Statesman Ada County Carmissioners ACHD : APA: CDH Ada County Zoning Director Nampa Meridian Irrigation File - Mail - Al Marsden August 17, 1982 Mrs. Annette Hinrichs, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Meridian City Hall Boise, Idaho 83642 Re: Amendment to Meridian City Comprehensive Plan Dear Mrs. Hinrichs: Enclosed is the original and five copies of material comprising an application for an amendment to the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. The material attached is submitted to answer the following seven items listed in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment provision: 1. Specific definition of the change being requested. 2. Specific information on any property involved. 3. The condition or situation which warrants a change being made in the Plan. 4. The public need for and benefit from such a change in the Plan. 5. Documentation that no other solutions to the problem presented by the current policy of the Plan are possible or reasonable. 6. Development intentions for any land involved. 7. Any other data and information need by the Planning and Zoning Commission in evaluating the proposal, such as who does it help, who does it hurt, how much is it going to cost, and who's going to pay for it. It is our understanding that the Planning & Zoning Commission will set a public hearing for reviewing requested Amendments in October and on this basis the property owners are submitting this request. There are no specific properties involved in this request; therefore, specific development intentions c&iAot be provided. However, any information needed by the Planning and Zoning Commission will be submitted upon request. Support- ing information has been supplied to the City Clerk and please advise me of any additional information required for this application; otherwise we will assume that i__t__ie--e@9plete. Sin erely / 644 1/ i .1, Alvin S. Marsden ASM: jm Encl. It is requested that the Meridian Planning Zoning Commission consider the following: 1. That all the requirements of the 1978 Meridian Comprehensive Plan Amendment Provision and Procedures and of the Local Land Use Planning Act, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, including all notice requirements and planning consideration should be met, also, Section 67-6508, Idaho Code, should be complied with concerning the review and updating of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan using most of the components stated therein. 2. That the Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan should be initiated by the Commission as authorized under the Plan's Amendment Provision and Procedure; since a letter of application has been submitted by a private individual and all the information necessary has been submitted to the Commission, thus, the requirements in the Amendment Provision and Proce- dures have been complied with. 3. That the Comprehensive Plan is designed for the planning of the City of Meridian and its Area of Impact as adopted in Ordinance No. 319 which area has been confirmed and approved by the Commission in 1978 and during 1982. 4. That the 1978 Meridian Comprehensive Plan waq. adopted pursuant to the Local Land Use Planning Act, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and all requirements of that act were met and complied with in its adoption. 5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of the economic conditions and of governmental actions, policies, and decisions, and one is that the City Ordinances and policies require development to pay for its own way which reduces the costs to the City for public facilities which should alleviate some of the Commission's concerns regarding eventual sewer and water service in the proposed Urban Service Planning Area. 6. That one overriding significant change has occurred within the Area of Impact; that change is the proposed construction of an interchange at the intersection of I-84 and Cloverdale Road; that the proposed construction of the interchange at Cloverdale Road and the accompanying increase of traffic and changes in routes and flows is a substantial change in the actual conditions of the entire Area of Impact and results in a material discrepancy between the conditions in the Area of Impact and the 1978 Meridian Comprehensive Plan; that planning for the eventual construction and the impact on the area that it will have is imperative at this time and not during construction or after it is constructed; that this one single change is sufficient to justify most of the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, particularly the extension of the Urban Service Planning Area to the east to Cloverdale Road and the change to Interchange Enterprise Area. 7. That the construction of an interchange at Cloverdale Road and the associated projected development will cause such an impact on transportation, and in order to handle the increased traffic flows generated by industrial and commercial development along Cloverdale Road, a freeway interchange is essential. The off and on ramps, frontage roads and streets within a develop- ment would have to be designed to fit the special needs of the type of develop- ment. Cloverdale Road from the freeway to Fairview and from the freeway to Overland Road would have to be widened. This would compliment plans by Ada County to designate Cloverdale Road a principal arterial. 8. The City of Meridian and the Ada County Highway District would need to plan for improvements which will be necessary for Cloverdale Road, Franklin Road, and Overland Road. 9. The changes in the Transportation Functional Definitions are mandated due to the change'in traffic flows expected to accompany the Cloverdale Road interchange. 0 'P10. That the construction of an interchange atoverdale Road will cause demand for development around the interchange due to the access to the freeway; that for development to occur,athe area around the interchange must have the capability of connecting to and receiving public services; that the closest services are those provided by the City of Meridian; that the sewage and drainage of the land and development in the area will have a significant impact on the City if not controlled by the City. 11. That it is in the best interests of the City of Meridian to include all of the area included in the east extension of the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area to Cloverdale Road so that the area can be controlled as to not be detrimental to the City in regard to sewage, water, transportation, aesthetic development, land uses, community design, and economic development. 12. That it is necessary to extend the Urban Service Planning Area to the east so that the recently annexed area designated as the Upland Industries Annexation and requested annexations to Cloverdale Road will be included in that planning area. 13. That since interchange areas, particularly in populated areas, tend to draw economic development to the interchange due to increased access and exposure and since the Area of Impact now will have three freeway interchanges, one at Meridian Road, one at Eagle Road, and one at Cloverdale Road, it is in the best interest of the City and the Area of Impact to not single out one interchange area over the other as the entire Area's ode point of commercial or industrial activity. 14. That the designation of Interchange Enterprise Area is for purposes of the Comprehensive Plan and is not a granting of zoning in the case of the Cloverdale Road Interchange; the Comprehensive Plan is intended only as a planning tool and is not a zoning or use permit. 15. That the designation of Interchange Enterprise Areas for the Cloverdale freeway interchange is in line with the proposed September 1982 Amendment and meets the 1978 Comprehensive Plan goal of Economic Development as set forth in the 1978 Plan at page 14 and the economic policies expressed throughout the Plan. 16. That 67-6508, Idaho Code, requires the Commission to perform certain planning functions and to adopt, update, and review a comprehensive plan using the planning components set forth therein; that the Commission initially adopted the 1978 Comprehensive Plan using all of the components; that in initiating the proposed amendments, the Commission should review the planning it had done in adopting the original plan; additionally, it should consider and study all of the components required by 67-6508, Idaho Code, and make findings on how the amendments will effect them. Also, the Commission should review the proposed Amendments to determine if they are in the best interest of the City and the Area of Impact. 17. That public hearings are requested to be held in November, 1982, concerning the proposed Amendments; that all notices of said public hearings be given as required by law and that all meetings be open to the public. 18. That notices of public hearings and other notices pertaining to the Amendments be made available to papers, radio and television stations. 19. That the City of Meridian adopted, pursuant to the requriements of Section 67-6526, Idaho Code, an Area of Impact; the Area of Impact was adopted by Ordinance 319 and was passed December 29, 1977, and included the following area: The west boundary being the Ada -Canyon County line; the north boundary beling Highway 20; the east boundary being Cloverdale Road until such point as Cloverdale reaches the Interstate - Overland Area, then including the Five -Mile, Eight -Mile and Ten - Mile Creek Drainage areas, but in no event shall it extend east past Cole Road or the New York Canal, whichever is closest; and bounded on the south being generally following the Rawson Canal to the point it intersects with Ada -Canyon County line. 20. That no amendments to the Meridian Comprehetive Plan have been submitted to the Commission since the adoption of the 1978 Comprehensive Plan, except those considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission during the April 1982 Commission meetings and adopted and submitted to City Council in September, 1982. 21. That in Oct/Nov. 1982, the Commission is requested to consider the proposed proposal to amend the Comprehensive Plan; the amendments are as follows: (A) Extend the Urban Service Planning Area to the centerline of Cloverdale Road as delineated on the attached map. (B) Designate the area adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad west of Cloverdale Road as Industrial. (C) Designate the area west of Cloverdale Road and north and south of I-84 as an Interchange Enterprise Area. (D) Designate Cloverdale Road as a major arterial. 22. Subsequently, the above Amendments are set forth in full. Addi- tionally, the Policy Diagram and the Transportation Map are attached to reflect the Amendments. FRONTAGE, RD p ROPOSED CHANGE MERIDIAN POLICY DIAGRAM` SOUTH GATE ICHINDEN BLVD N /x 1 M� VIE - SON ws RD. FF fi 14lIXh.11 l: a t: PROPOSED ELEiVIEN'T ARY SCHOOLS ri„�a. C:()IYIIVI(:hl'l 1 i. ri,itii :St;rviCC P1ali1iing Area PROPOSED JUNIOR HIGH 'NEIC;TTIi()RHOODS WATERWAYS & OPEN SPACE CORRIDORS RURAL RESIDENTIAL RESERVE (=o BIDE & PEDESTRIAN WAYS T I'EC 11NIC'.AL INDUSTRIAL REVIEW AREA *The Meridian Policy Diagram is intended T"W INDUSTRIAL REVIEW AREAS to meet the requirements of the 1975 Lan( < INTERCHANGE ENTERPRISE AREA Planning Act regarding a proposed land use map. ® COMMUNI'T'Y SHOPPING CENTER 1& JUNIOR & SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS .It • I I [! Ll August 17, 1982 Mrs. Annette Hinrichs, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Meridian City Hall Boise, Idaho 83642 LJ Re: Amendment to Meridian City Comprehensive Plan Dear Mrs. Hinrichs: Enclosed is the original and five copies of material comprising an application for an amendment to the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. The material attached is submitted to answer the following seven items listed in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment provision: 1. Specific definition of the change being requested. 2. Specific information on any property involved. 3. The condition or situation which warrants a change being made in the Plan. 4. The public need for and benefit from such a change in the Plan. 5. Documentation that no other solutions to the problem presented by the current policy of the Plan are possible or reasonable. 6. Development intentions for any land involved. 7. Any other data and information need by the Planning and Zoning Commission in evaluating the proposal, such as who does it help, who does it hurt, how much is it going to cost, and who's going to pay for it. . It is our understanding that the Planning & Zoning Commission will set a public hearing for reviewing requested Amendments in October and on this basis the property owners are submitting this request. There are no specific properties involved in this request; therefore, specific development intentions cannot be provided. However, any information needed by the Planning and Zoning Commission will be submitted upon request. Support- ing information has been supplied to the City Clerk and please advise me of any additional information required for this application; otherwise we will assume that i plete. Sin erely 11 111._ Alvin S. Marsden ASM: jm Encl. e Meridian City Council S ®� March 21. 1981 Regular meeting of the Meridian City Council called to order by Mayor Joseph Glaisyer at 7:30 p.m. Council Members Present: Grant Kingsford; Ron Tolsma; Bill Brewer Council Members Absent: Rick Orton, Orr. Others Present: Vern Schoen; Bruce Stuart; Roger Welker; Teresa Sidener; Mr. & Mrs. Clarence McKague; Robert Giesler; Michael Zuzel; Steve Gratton; Al Marsden; R.C. Spencer; Earl Ward; Coenraad Abas; Wayne Crookston Jr.; Jack Niemann Minutes of the previous meeting held March 7, 1983 were approved as written. Minutes of the Special Meeting held March 14, 1983 were approved as written. Item 1 Approval of Preliminary Agreement & Inducement Resolution for Issue of Industrial Revenue Bonds to Elixir Industries Glaisyer explained that the Council needed to approve of the Preliminary Agreement and Inducement Resolution for the issue of Indutrial Revenue Bonds to formalize the agreement with Elixir Industries. The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Tolsma to approve of the Inducement Resolution for issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds to Elixir Industries by the Economic Development Corporation of the City of Meridian, and also to approve of the preliminary agreement to Elixir Industries. Motion Carried: Kingsford, yea; Tolsma, yea; Brewer, yea The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Brewer to approve of the City Clerk signing a resolution approving an agreement of the Economic Development Corporation of the City of Meridian to issue bonds for Elixir Industries. Motion Carried: Kingsford, yea; Tolsma, yea; Brewer, yea Item 2 Request for Reimbursement from EPA for overpayment on Grant Mayor Glaisyer made reference to a letter received from EPA requesting payment of $1,622.00 for overdispersement to the City of Meridian for the Sewer/Water Treatment Plant. (Letter on file with these minutes) The Motion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Tolsma to authorize issuance of payment in the amount of $1,622.00 to EPA for overdispersement to the City of Meridian for the Sewer/Water Treatment Plant. Motion Carried: Kingsford, yea; Tolsma, yea; Brewer, yea Item 3 Appeal of Marsden & Associates on behalf of Dobaran et al concerning Planning &, Zoning Commission denial for Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Al Marsden, Marsden & Associates representing Dcbaran et al, was present representing the appeal of the Planning & Zoning decision for denial of the request for Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Glaisyer: "Mr. Marsden you have submitted comprehensive information- to the Council. They have also had record of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law prepared by the City Attorney. On the request of the Council, we do not want to rehash that material. We would however, be most interested in anything over and above that material that you have to present to the City Council tonight." Meridian City Council 2. March 21, 1983' Item 3 Appeal of Marsden & Associates on behalf of Dobaran et al Cont'd.. ... . . . Marsden explained that the request for the Comprehensive Plan Admendment is to modify the Urban Service Planning area to Cloverdale, to allow an Industrial Park on the property between Cloverdale and Eagle Roads. Marsden said that this Industrial Complex would serve the entire region and be of great benefit to the City of Meridian. Marsden showed sldWes of the region, and the abuttment to the exisitng City Limits. Marsden also showed slARes of the type of Industrial Complex that was planned for the area. Marsden stated that the request is being made now because of the time factor. Marsden: "It takes time to plan, finance, to market, to promote and to develop the property." Marsden said that this would create jobs for the area, and with Cloverdale and Eagle Roads being designated as interchanges, will have major impacts on this location. Marsden: "The City needs to plan this area to insure proper development, make sure the standards are properly developed in cooperation with the property owners, and we feel this area should belong to Meridian and not another agency or City." _ Marsden presented slides showing the surrounding land uses. Marsden stated that this development would be very compatible; with the existing uses of the adjacent properties, and because of the Freeway and Railroad impacts would be a major industrial and manufacturing area. Marsden also stated that with the two proposed interchanges at Eagle Road and Cloverdale Road, this area is the "center of the entire region." Marsden stated that the request to move the Urban Service Planning Area so that Industrial development can occur to Cloverdale or up to 1/4 mile of Cloverdale. Marsden said that "Meridian needs control of future growth to Cloverdale, because it is in the City's best interest." Marsden stated this is because utilities can be extended, the City needs to insure the area will be properly developed to City standards, and the City can develop a land use pattern that is truly compatible to the Citizens of Meridian and the overall development of the City. Marsden: "In conclusion, the reason for the request is that we would like to develop an industrial park, that will provide major industrial facility opportunities for jobs in this region. We believe there is a need to provide jobs. There is a need to properly plan the area, and we think that Meridian should be planning and controlling the area. We need to stimulate the economy of our area." "If you extend your Urban Service Planning Area, it will allow the County to allow major industrial functions to occur, and that is our interest." Mayor Glaisyer: "Are there any questions of Al :(Marsden)?" There was no response. The Motion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Brewer to uphold the findings of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission for denial of the request for admendment to the Comprehensive Plan, and accept the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law prepared by the City Attorney concerning the request. Motion Carried: Kingsford, yea; Tolsma, yea; Brewer, yea Item 4 Pre -Termination Hearing Water/Sewer/Trash Delinquencies Mayor Glaisyer: "This is to inform you in writing, if you choose to, you have the right to a pre -termination hearing, at 7:30'p.m., March 21, 1983, before the Mayor and Council, to appear in person to be judged on facts and defend the claim made by the City that your Water, Sewer, and Trash bill is delinquent. You may retain Counsel. This service will be discontinued March 24, 1983, unless payment is received in FULL." "Total amount outstanding $1,269.25. Is there anyone in the audience that wishes to have a pre -termination -hearing this evening?" HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN LAWANA L. NIEMANN, City Clerk A. M. KIESERT, Treasurer RICHARD D. NICHOLS, Chief of Police 728 Meridian Street BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. 1VIERIDIAN, IDAHO JOHN O. FITZGERALD, Attorney ROGER WELKER, Fire Chief 83842 EARL WARD, Waste Water Supt. Phone 88841433 JOSEPH L. OLAISYER Mayor March 1, 1983 Mr. Alvin Marsden Marsden & Associates P.O. Box 771 Boise, Idaho 83701 Re: Meridian Comprehensive Plan Atwndment Dear Al; Your appeal of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Canmission decision on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment has been scheduled to be heard at the regular Meridian City Council Meeting on March 21, 1983. If this date is not satisfactory, please advose. COUNCILMEN GRANT P. KINGSFORD BILL BREWER RICHARD F. ORTON, JR. RONALD R. TOLSMA ANNETTE C. HINRICHS Chairman Zoning & Planning Is rI rUff" W -l" ON I , , IfI La February 24, 1983 City Clerk City of Meridian 728 Meridian Street Meridian, Idaho 836+2 Re: Meridian Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dear Jack: A7C.Act M,, j�' ;Z 1, laL3 We wish to appeal the Planning and Zoning Commission decision on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The attached reasons outline their ose of this appeal. If you/have any Alvin S. Marsden Attachment �WeI A0J- ons do not hesitate to contact us. P.O. Box 771 BOISE, IDAHO 83701 TELEPHONE (208) 344-4343 Urban and Regional Planning, Urban Design, Project Plans, Ordinances, Transportation Planning, Environmental Assessments, and Special Studies INr.ROWCTION A number of simple facts characterize the unincorporated area between the cities of Boise and Meridian. • Residential development has been gradual but has relentlessly increased since 1970. For example, there are almost 7,000 people (1980 census) living in single family homes between Cale and Cloverdale Roads,• and Fairview and I-84. Other land between the two cities is zoned for residential development so that future population growth there is virtually inevitable. • The Union Pacific railroad connects the cities at or near each of the city centers. Heavy commercial and industrial projects have developed historically along this line. The result is that the Union Pacific railroad/Franklin Avenue area is now me of the largest concentrations of warehouses, wholesale outlets, and manufacturing in the State of IdaW. Adapted Comprehensive Plans and existing zoning policy will help ior) of heavy commtercial development along the railroad right-of-way. • I-84 is a principal traffic artery across southern Idaho and is a direct connection between Boise and Meridian. Actual or planned oDn=tratiotss of heavy commercial development have occurred at the off -ramps in each city. The off ramps have created "nodes" of activity. The State Departs l Of Transportation plans call for additional off ramps between the cities. This will inevitably result in new "nodes" of activity in the near futuro� e Fairview, Franklin, and overland are primary, but high capacity arteries between Boise and Meridian. Development along these roads, in recent history, has included concentrations of commerce and industry in the midst cc residential and agricultural areas. Plane and zoning now in existence will allow the land along these roads to fully develop. These facts represent the recent past reality of growth in this area. The reality for the future is that growth and development will continue to occur in this area. More precisely, this area has been and will continue tobe cm of the highest growth areas in Ada County. There are few reasonable arguments that could be formulated to totally forestall growth in this intercity area. However, there are many arguments that can be offered to properly manage and channel this inevitable growth. Those arguments have been made with equal force by individual. residents (witness results of public opinion surveys), by private companies (as in need for residential, commercial and industrial development), and by local government motivated by a communitywide need for good planning and control. Now is an appropriate time to aggregate these arguments as a policy to Ileal with the future of this important intercity area. The goal and related policies should be to insure that this area grows and develope to be an area beautiful to look at, pleasing to live or work in, and productive in the interests of business and government. The alternative to good intercity planning is the all too easy potential for urban chaos. The easiest source of chaos is adversary arguments that pit public officials and staff against private business interests. It is preferable that Treasure Valley communities search for a balance between the 0 public good and private business interest. This balance should result in development "paying its way" and government being a partner in growth management with area communities and businesses. This balance will not necessarily result in an optimum or the best solution for all interests. There probably is no one best location for an industrial complex because there is no one place where public services are best, or ; public revenues are best, or traffic access is best, or business support is best, or citizen support is best. There is certainly no one place where all of these are best. Balance, therefore, becomes a matter of objective facts, good will, and a spirit of negotiation to reach an acceptable.if not optimum solution. This, in turn, must be based upon (1) clear understanding of related costs and benefits; (2) probable impacts on the existing environment; (3) know— ledge of the effect on public plans and control mechanisms; (4) influence on the transportation system; and (5) relationship to the area market. This discussion presents a summary of why the urban service planning area should be extended to Cloverdale Road and the issues especially as they relate to the, City of Meridian and its residents. Insofar as possible, these issues are. discussed not only as they relate to the plan change, but also.intervening residential, commercial, and industrial land. The spirit of these reeommendations is to extend the urban service planning area to allow the City of'Meridian and; business to collectively do what is best for the public good. 3 RArKCTRniTNTn This statement discusses the complex issues resulting from the interaction of business and government over major real estate development in a community. Each of the brief summary statements below provide a background to a decision on the extension of Meridian's urban service planning area. 1. The intercity area between Boise and Meridian has developed in recent history, and will inevitably continue to do so in the future. Major influencing factors are the I-84 freeway, the Union Pacific raill,ine, existing plans, and zoning, and freeway off -ramps. 2. Prudent development of this intercity area will require the specific., intent cooperation of business,.government, and the community., Without this cooperation and interaction, the change for chaos in.this intercity area is increased. 3. Freeway interchanges should be regarded as the source of potential benefits to Meridian if they are within the area of City control. These benefits include improved unicipal tax based through interchange development, increased mobility, and potential for better urban form among others. 4. One or more freeway interchanges will be built in the intercity area beginning in 1985. This will stimulate continued development and growth between the two cities. 5. Demand in the market for commercial and industrial facilities will parallel population movement and settlement generally toward the west as a' function of many characteristics of the area market, traffic patterns, zoning, and developable land. 6. The combined intercity development of a mall, freeway interchanges, and industrial land will result in employment opportunities for about`12,000 people, approximately one-third of whom would tend to reside in ornear the City of Meridian. 7. The potential development patterns along the freeway and the railroad can be visualized based on similar experience elsewhere, and should be included in current plans or plan revisions. 8. Development along the freeway and UP right-of-way will add to the tax base;, and create, through increased tax revenues and job opportunities, an increased degree of community self-sufficiency. 9. In a future including growth of any kind, that which would occur in the intercity area would have minimal impacts on any aspect of the environment. 10. Extending the urban service planning area will increase the opportunity to implement the Comprehensive Plan goals by control over a major determinants of future City growth and change -- the freeway and UP Railroad. 11. A major Comprehensive Plan goal of community self-sufficiency can be realized if Meridian capitalizes on the potential represented by the intercity area. 12. The driving time area and population served from the Cloverdale and Eagle Roads is much larger than any location in the region. In other words, the area is more nearly in the center of the popualtion. A centrally located uses means the potential for fewer trip miles and, therefore, less energy used. 4 DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE ?ti The property owner's objective is to collectively develop an industrial park. The best use for the property adjacent to the UP Railroad is industrial -and based upon market projections the uses include -manufacturing and warehouse functions. The easy access to the freeway and adjoining rail service 1.. -will provide users the required regional orientation, Manufacturers will want to locate along the UP between Cloverdale and Eagle Roads because the freeva; interchanges are located in the center of the trsde area that extends from Ontario, Oregon to Mountain Home and beyond:. Cloverdale and.Eagle RQade have 207,300 people within a 30 minute driving time and serves,a mueh'larger geographical area than other potential industrial sites located in Meridian`, Boise or the Treasure Valley. This will reduce the user cost to:distribute' goods from a central location, and obtain employees from Meridian and,Trea.sure p Valley. The property owners intend to promote these location a:dvan. ages'and help Meridian achieve its goal of community self-sufficiency. Since the area is adjacent to the UP Railroad and borders Cloverdale and Eagle Roads, it would be the best location to encourage manufacturing asses to locate and that is the purpose of the property owners, COMMUNITY DESIGN The Comprehensive Plan encourages the importance of creating an nviting visual and functional identity for the City. The proposed eh Plan amendment will create a uniform shape to the east and with I the development of Eagle, Meridian and Cloverdale interchange areas, they will give the City ogntrol of the land along the interstate and UP Railroad. The City,.therefor6, can control the appearance of this area. Using proper controls, the City can achieve' or create a positive visual appearance. .As each developer submits a aevelopment_ plan for each parcel, he would be required to implement the Cityl s iib This concept would provide a major aesthetic enhancement to the City apd.Wi;�l help achieve policies 6 and 10 in the Comprehensive Plan. If undesirable uses do occur, a landscaping plan, should be formulated to screen the uses and reduce their impact. If this and other programs',are implemented, a strong community identity will be achieved. The Comprehensive Plan currently suggests that design tools be developed; (1) to enhance the urban form, (2) to strengthen the community image, (3) to provide_.''a strong community entrance, (4) to implement design standards, etc. The attached Concept Development Plan outlines in a visual framevork how these design concepts can be implemented. In summary, a strong community identity can be established by good landscaping, building design, and signing. The result of this would be separate identities for Meridian and Boise. 5 n` i 5yiyk URBAN SPRAWL ?, t: Concensus has been voiced about the prospect of urban sprawl and high .costs of urban services. With the introduction of interchanges on I-84 at Eagle, Meridian, and Cloverdale Roads, the prospect of regional uses occurring in these areas and the resulting traffic will not be compatible with the concept of keeping a rural buffer between Boise and Meridian. On the other hand, the introduction of regional uses will have the opposite effect of that predicted by skeptics. The resulting effect of having several major.reg�ona.l catalysts along the I-84 interstate and railroad corridor will have far more advantageous economic benefits for both Meridian and Boise than is attainable by a policy of urban separation. What is often referred to as urban sprawl between Meridian and toise can actually be a consolidation and infilling between the two cities along a highly advantageous regional economic activity corridor between,'FairvieFr Avenue and Overland Roads. Furthermore, the development of a corridor of major regional economic activities will matte the prospect of mass transit between ' the two cities much more viable, because major employment and retail activities will be concentrated along an easily,servicable linear corridor. This in turn can have some very positive effects on environmental quality would be far more beneficial to Meridiantoencourage infilling of tai: corridor between Boise and Meridian with strong economic activity that it would be to attempt to isolate Meridian from Boise. The two city 'areas,axe economically intertwined in any case, and physical separation only JiSsens their ability to maximize the economic benefits that. are possible` through combined effect of a high diversified linear axis of regional economic activities. Also, the quality of life will not be destroyed by this "`action because one can still travel.a very short distance to experience the wide open spaces of our area available to the south, north and west ',These`�are' in great abundance. Consequently, both the Meridian area of impact and the urban service.planning area should be moved to the east to Cloverdale Road to encourage the infilling of the area between Eagle and Cloverdale Roads. .The'eurren't boundaries support the concept of urban separation which will not permit optimum economic development. It is very important to re-emphasize the regional significance of the uses encouraged by,the proposed interstate interchanges. Conclusions: 1. The following changes to the Comprehensive Plan are proposed: Expand the urban service area to Cloverdale Road from Fairview Avenue to Overland Road. Include the west side of Cloverdale as an interchange enterprise area. Encourage industrial development along the Union Pacific right of way. 6 PROJECTED MARKET DEMAND ` b� ':rf' r". The central location of Meridian between two major business areas of Boise, 74 and Caldwell -Nampa has some outstanding economic advantages. The improvement of the interchanges at Meridian, Eagle, and Cloverdale Roads will create unusually good opportunities for strengthening Meridian's economic outlook and for stimulating quality commercial or industrial activities that could be unique in the region. A preliminary market analysis demonstrates the demand for several land uses which will make a positive contribution tp'Meri-dian's tax base. The property development at Cloverdale, Eagle and .Meridian Road,Gould be instrumental in the creation of uses and:acitivites which Vrill b¢ ;i:n keeping with the desired character and image of Meridian. The development at each. of,..-. the interchange areas can have a definite upgrading effect upon the Ide�riAan Clp and community, The present pattern must be changed if Meridian residents ire to have a community which reflects their philosphical as well as their functional requirements. The actual development which takes place wild be a #'urtoti of , the availability of specific sites, the demand, as well as the,controls imple- mented by the City. It is assumed that: 1. I-84 interchanges will be built. 2. That Meridian is located in the center of the region and between two major population/business centers and this centrality presents some very positive advantages with the increased accessibility. 3. The community of Meridian is in itself unique. u,. The projected market demand for activities at the proposed interchanges and along the UP right-of-way is sufficient so that they will occur with or without the development of a shopping center. The volume of traffic projected on Meridian, Cloverdale, and Eagle, Franklin and Overland Roads (with or -without a shopping center) will create a sufficient demand to stimulate urban„development. These volumes will be greater than the volumes on many existing streets in. Boise and Meridian. With greater freeway or regional access, to the planned industrial axreas along the railroad right-of-way, it is projected that industrial. activiti66 -will develop sooner and more intensely. Uses would be mostly warehousing, but with improved access more intense industrial and manufacturing centers will develop. With or without the development of a shopping center this impact'will'oecur °:Businesses., will locate in the Meridian area because of the increased regional Accessibility, increase availability of a labor force within a reasonable time period, and a more economical distribution of goods and services. The probability of preserving the area between Five Mile Road'and Locust Grove Road and along the freeway for agricultural uses is remote. It is more. probable that urban development will occur from Fairview Avenue to Overland and this area will fully develop within the time period of the Meridian.Com prehensive Plan. Impacts beyond these areas will be minor and can be controlled by zoning and planning tools currently available in order to preserve -the -open areas north of Fairview and south of Overland. Clearly development will tend, over the long term, to move toward vacant areas and avoid high cost, high density central areas. This translates simplyas an increased probability of growth to the west and a much smaller amount of growth in central cities. 8 COMMUNITY SELF-SUFFICIENCY The Meridian Comprehensive Plan encourages the City of Meridian to become self-sufficient and encourages the development of industrial and employment generating land uses. The Comprehensive Plan reserves land for industrial, retail and commercial/ office uses at desirable business locations and any major employers should not place undue burden or cost on the provision of urban services. Several sites have been reserved in the Comprehensive Plan.for industrial development, as follows: 1. Adjoining the Ten Mile and Eagle interchange, 2. Mixed use areas south of the freeway, 3. At the interchange enterprise areas, and 4. Along the railroad right-of-way. The provision of the interchanges at Ten Mile, Eagle, Meridian and Cloverdale and utilization of the interchange enterprise area concept will assist Meridian to achieve the goal of self-sufficiency. Also, the proposed interchanges will have a positive impact upon growth of the industrial areas along the raaTlroad right-of-way. The proposed modifications suggest that an interchange enterprise area be designated at each of the freeway interchanges. This would allow highway oriented uses and regional activities to locate at any of the intereha4ges'. A concept plan is presented to help graphically show the possible development opportunities that exist along the freeway and the UP right-of-way. The proposed policy change of extending the urban service planning area to Cloverdale Road provides the following benefits: 1. This policy would support the objective of community self-sufficiency. 2. This policy would assist in obtaining major industrial and manufacturing uses in Meridian, by allowing private enterprise to select from, several possible sites that meet the City's economic objectives.' It is recommended that the urban service planning area be expanded to include the area up to the west side of Cloverdale Road and allow industrial use to locate along the UP right-of-way and regional activities to locate at 'each'of the interchanges. THE ENVIRONMENT The environmental impacts from extending the urban service planning area to Cloverdale Road and land use development will not be significant to:thip,,,rea. There are no significant environmental impacts expected due to interchange and land use development. OFFICIALS LAWANA L. NIEMANN, City Clerk A. M. KIEBERT, Treasurer RICHARD D. NICHOLS, Chief of Police BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN O. FITZGERALD, Attorney ROGER WELKER, Fire Chief EARL WARD, Waste Water Supt. March 22, 1983 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEI' A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 728 Meridian Street MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone BU -4433 JOSEPH L. GLAISYER Mayor Mr. Alvin Marsden Marsden & Associates P.O. Box 771 Boise, Idaho 83701 Re: Meridian Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dear Al, Your appeal of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission decision on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment was heard at the Meridian City Council meeting held March 21, 1983 and the Council unamimusly voted to uphold the decision of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Clerk COUNCILMEN GRANT P. KINGSFORD BILL BREWER RICHARD F.ORTON, JR. RONALD R. TOLSMA ANNETTE C. HINRICHS Chairman Zoning 8 Planning OFFICIALS LAWANA L. NIEMANN, City Clerk A. M. KIEBERT, Treasurer RICHARD D. NICHOLS, Chief of Police BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN O. FITZGERALD, Attorney ROGER WELKER, Fire Chief EARL WARD, Waste Water Supt. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 728 Meridian Street MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Pbone 888.4433 JOSEPH L. GLAISYER Mayor March 22, 1983 Mr. Alvin Marsden Marsden & Associates P.O. Box 771 Boise, Idaho 83701 Re: Meridian Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dear Al, Your appeal of the Meridian Planning & Zoning C m-Lission decision on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment was heard at the Meridian City Council meeting held March 21, 1983 and the Council unamimously voted to uphold the decision of the Planning & Zoning Ccarmission. sincerely, 6CJ 4k- ty Clerk COUNCILMEN GRANT P. KINGSFORD BILL BREWER RICHARD F. ORTON, JR. RONALD R. TOLSMA ANNETTE C. HINRICHS Chairman Zoning b Planning HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN LAWANA L NIEMANN, City Clerk A. M. KIEBERT, Treasurer RICHARD D. NICHOLS, Chief of Police 728 Meridian street BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. MERIDIAN JOHN O. FITZGERALD, Attorney , IDAHO ROGER WELKER, Fire Chief 83842 EARL WARD, Waste Water Supt. Phone 888.4433 JOSEPH L. OLAISYER Mayor March 1, 1983 Mr. Alvin Marsden Marsden & Associates P.O. Box 771 Boise, Idaho 83701 Re: Meridian Ccanprehensive Plan Amendment Dear Al; Your appeal of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Ccarmission decision on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment has been scheduled to be heard at the regular Meridian City Council Meeting on March 21, 1983. If this date is not satisfactory, please advose. COUNCILMEN GRANT P. KINGSFORD BILL BREWER RICHARD F. ORTON, JR. RONALD R. TOLSMA ANNETTE C. HINRICHS Chairman Zoning R Planning &A' YOCIM'/ PLANNING CONSULTANTS February 24, 1983 City Clerk City of Meridian 728 Meridian Street Meridian, Idaho 836+2 Re: Meridian Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dear Jack: A7 c.�- �q �•Q f� ;z 1) We wish to appeal the Planning and Zoning Commission decision on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The attached reasons outline the-pur.Zose of this appeal. If youIfiave any questions do not hesitate to contact us. Alvin S. Marsden Attachment cs •3' CF t 1 P.O. Box 771 BOISE, IDAHO 83701 TELEPHONE (208) 344-4343 Urban and Regional Planning, Urban Design, Project Plans, Ordinances, Transportation Planning, Environmental Assessments, and Special Studies INTRODUCTION A munber of simple facts characterize the unincorporated area between the cities of Boise and Meridian. • Residential development has been gradual but has relentlessly increased since 1970. For example, there are almost 7,000 people (1980 census) living in single family homes between Cole and Cloverdale Roads, and Fairview and I-84. Other land between the two cities is zoned for residential development so that future population growth there is virtually inevitable. • The Union Pacific railroad connects the cities at or near each of the city centers. Heavy commercial and industrial projects have developed historically along this line. The result is that the Union Pacific railroad/Franklin Avenue area is now one of the largest concentrations of warehouses, wholesale outlets, and manufacturing in the State of Idaho. Adopted Comprehensive Plans and existing zoning policy will help continuation of heavy commercial development along the railroad right-of-imy. • I-84 is a principal traffic artery across southern Idaho and is a ' direct connection between Boise and Meridian. Actual or planned concentrations of heavy commercial development have occurred at the off -ramps in each city. The off ramps have created anodes" of activity. The State Department of Transportation plans call for additional off ramps between the cities. This will inevitably result in new anodes" of activity in the near future, • Fairview, Franklin, and overland are primary, but high capacity arteries between Boise and Meridian. Development along these roads, in recent history, has included concentrations of oommerce and industry in the midst of residential and agricultural areas. Plans and zoning now in existence will allow the land along these roads to fully develop. These facts represent the recent past reality of growth in this area. The reality for the future is that growth and development will continue to occur in this area. More precisely, this area has been and will continue to be one of the highest growth areas in Ada County. There are few reasonable arguments that could be formoilated to totally forestall growth in this intercity area. However, there are many arguments that can be offered to properly manage and channel this inevitable growth. Those arguments have been made with equal force by individual residents (witness results of public opinion surveys), by private companies (as in need for residential, commercial and industrial development), and by local government motivated by a commnuiitywide need for good planning and control. Now is an appropriate time to aggregate these arguments as a policy to deal with the future of this important intercity area. The goal and related policies should be to insure that this area grows and develops to be an area beautiful to look at, pleasing to live or work in, and productive in the interests of business and government. The alternative to good intercity planning is the all too easy potential for urban chaos. The easiest source of chaos is adversary arguments that pit public officials and staff against private business interests. It is preferable that Treasure Valley communities search for a balance between the public good and private business interest. This balance should result in development "paying its way" and government being a partner in growth management with area communities and businesses. This balance will not necessarily result in an optimum or the best solution for all interests. There probably is no one best location for an industrial complex because there is no one place where public services are best, or public revenues are best, or traffic access is best, or business support is best, or citizen support is best. There is certainly no one place where all of these are best. Balance, therefore, becomes a matter of objective facts, good will, and a spirit of negotiation to reach an acceptable if not optimum solution. This, in turn, must be based upon (1) clear understanding of related costs and benefits; (2) probable impacts on the existing environment; (3) know- ledge of the effect on public plans and control mechanisms; (4) influence on the transportation system; and (5) relationship to the area market. This discussion presents a summary of why the urban service planning area should be extended to Cloverdale Road and the issues especially as they relate to the City of Meridian and its residents. Insofar as possible, these issues are discussed not only as they relate to the plan change, but also intervening residential, commercial, and industrial land. The spirit of these recommendations is to extend the urban service planning area to allow the City of Meridian and business to collectively do what is best for the public good. 3 BACKORMTHT) This statement discusses the complex issues resulting from the interaction of business and government over major real estate development in a community. Each of the brief summary statements below provide a background to a decision on the extension of Meridian's urban service planning area. . 1. The intercity area between Boise and Meridian has developed in recent history, and will inevitably continue to do so in the future.. Major influencing factors are the I-84 freeway, the Union Pacific railline, existing plans, and zoning, and freeway off -ramps. 2. Prudent development of this intercity area will require the specific., intent cooperation of business, government, and the community. Without this cooperation and interaction, the change for chaos in this intgrcity area is increased. 3. Freeway interchanges should be regarded as the source of potential benefits to Meridian if they are within the area of City control. These benefits include improved unicipal tax based through interchange development, increased mobility, and potential for better urban form among others. 4. One or more freeway interchanges will be built in the intercity area beginning in 1985. This will stimulate continued development and growth between the two cities. 5. Demand in the market for commercial and industrial facilities will parallel population movement and settlement generally toward the west as a function of many characteristics of the area market, traffic patterns, zoning, and developable land. 6. The combined intercity development of a mall, freeway interchanges, and industrial land will result in employment opportunities for about 32,000 people, approximately one-third of whom would tend to reside in or near the City of Meridian. 7. The potential development patterns along the freeway and the railroad can be visualized based on similar experience elsewhere, and should be included in current plans or plan revisions. 8. Development along the freeway and UP right-of-way will add to the tax base,, and create, through increased tax revenues and job opportunities, an increased degree of community self-sufficiency. 9. In a future including growth of any kind, that which would occur in the intercity area would have minimal impacts on any aspect of the environment. 10. Extending the urban service planning area will increase the opportunity to implement the Comprehensive Plan goals by control over a major determinants of future City growth and change -- the freeway and UP Railroad. 11. A major Comprehensive Plan goal of community self-sufficiency can be realized if Meridian capitalizes on the potential represented by the intercity area. 12. The driving time area and population served from the Cloverdale and Eagle Roads is much larger than any location in the region. In other words, the area is more nearly in the center of the popualtion. A centrally located uses means the potential for fewer trip miles and, therefore, less energy used. �t DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE The property owner's objective is to collectively develop an industrial park. The best use for the property adjacent to the UP Railroad is industrial and based upon market projections the uses include manufacturing and warehouse functions. The easy access to the freeway and adjoining rail service will provide users the required regional orientation. Manufacturers will want to locate along the UP between Cloverdale and Eagle Roads because the freeway interchanges are located in the center of the trade area that extends from Ontario, Oregon to Mountain Home and beyond. Cloverdale and Eagle Roads have 207,300 people within a 30 minute driving time and serves a much larger geographical area than other potential industrial sites located in Meridian, Boise or the Treasure Valley. This will reduce the user cost to distribute goods from a central location, and obtain employees from Meridian and Treasure Valley. The property owners intend to promote these location advantages and help Meridian achieve its goal of community self-sufficiency. Since the area is adjacent to the UP Railroad and borders Cloverdale and Eagle Roads, it would be the best location to encourage manufacturing uses to locate and that is the purpose of the property owners. COMMUNITY DESIGN The Comprehensive Plan encourages the importance of creating end inviting visual and functional identity for the City. The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment will create a uniform shape to the east and with the development of Eagle, Meridian and Cloverdale interchange areas, they will give the City control of the land along the interstate and UP Railroad. The City, therefore, can control the appearance of this area. Using proper controls, the City can achieve or create a positive visual appearance. As each developer submits a development plan for each parcel, he would be required to implement the City's objectives. This concept would provide a major aesthetic enhancement to the City and will help achieve policies 6 and 10 in the Comprehensive Plan. If undesirable uses do occur, a landscaping plan should be formulated to screen the uses and reduce their impact. If this and other programs are implemented, a strong community identity will be achieved. The Comprehensive Plan currently suggests that design tools be developed: (1) to enhance the urban form, (2) to strengthen the community image, (3) to provide a strong community entrance, (4) to implement design standards, etc. The attached Concept Development Plan outlines in a visual framework how these design concepts can be implemented. In summary, a strong community identity can be established by good landscaping, building design, and signing. The result of this would be separate identities for Meridian and Boise. 5 URBAN SPRAWL Concensus has been voiced about the prospect of urban sprawl and high costs of urban services. With the introduction of interchanges on I=84 at Eagle, Meridian, and Cloverdale Roads, the prospect of regional uses occurring in these areas and the resulting traffic will not be compatible with the concept of keeping a rural buffer between Boise and Meridian. On the other hand, the introduction of regional uses will have the opposite effect of that predicted by skeptics. The resulting effect of having several major regional catalysts along the I-84 interstate and railroad corridor will have far more advantageous economic benefits for both Meridian and Boise than is attainable by a policy of urban separation. What is often referred to as urban sprawl between Meridian and Aoise can actually be a consolidation and infilling between the two cities along a highly advantageous regional economic activity corridor between Fairview Avenue and Overland Roads. Furthermore, the development of a corridor of major regional economic activities will make the prospect of mass transit between the two cities much more viable, because major employment and retail activities will be concentrated along an easily servicable linear corridor. This in turn can have some very positive effects on environmental quality. It would be far more beneficial to Meridian to encourage infilling of the corridor between Boise and Meridian with strong economic activity that it would be to attempt to isolate Meridian from Boise. The two ci.ty'areas are economically intertwined in any case, and physical separation only lessens their ability to maximize the economic benefits that are possible through combined effect of a high diversified linear axis of regional economic activities. Also, the quality of life will not be destroyed by this action because one can still travel a very short distance to experience the wide open spaces of our area available to the south, north and west. These are in great abundance. Consequently, both the Meridian area of impact and the urban service planning area should be moved to the east to Cloverdale Road to encourage the infilling of the area between Eagle and Cloverdale Roads. The current boundaries support the concept of urban separation which will not permit optimum economic development. It is very important to re-emphasize the regional significance of the uses encouraged by the proposed interstate interchanges. Conclusions: I. The following changes to the Comprehensive Plan are proposed: Expand the urban service area to Cloverdale Road from Fairview Avenue to Overland Road. Include the west side of Cloverdale as an interchange enterprise area. Encourage industrial development along the Union Pacific right of way. 6 PROJECTED MARKET DEMAND ` The central location of Meridian between two major business areas of Boise, and Caldwell -Nampa has some outstanding economic advantages. The improvement of the interchanges at Meridian, Eagle, and Cloverdale Roads will create unusually good opportunities for strengthening Meridian's economic outlook and for stimulating quality commercial or industrial activities that could be unique in the region. A preliminary market analysis demonstrates the demand for several land uses which will make a positive contribution to Meridian's tax base. The property development at Cloverdale, Eagle and Meridian Road could be instrumental in the creation of uses and acitivites which will b¢ �n keeping with the desired character and image of Meridian. The development, at each of the interchange areas can have a definite upgrading effect upon the Meridian `:CBD' and community. The present pattern must be changed if Meridian residents are to have a community which reflects their philosphical as well as their functional requirements. The actual development which•takes place will be a function of the availability of specific sites, the demand, as well as the controls imple- mented by the City. It is assumed that: 1. I-84 interchanges will be built. 2. That Meridian is located in the center of the region and between two major population/business centers and this centrality presents some very positive advantages with the increased accessibility. 3. The community of Meridian is in itself unique. The projected market demand for activities at the proposed interchanges and along the UP right-of-way is sufficient so that they will occur with or without the development of a shopping center. The volume of traffic projected on Meridian, Cloverdale, and Eagle, Franklin and Overland Roads (with or without a shopping center) will create a sufficient demand to stimulate urban development. These volumes will be greater than the volumes on many existing streets in Boise and Meridian. With greater freeway or regional access, to the planned industrial areas along the railroad right-of-way, it is projected that industrial activities wall develop sooner and more intensely. Uses would be mostly warehousing,'but with improved access more intense industrial and manufacturing centers will develop. With or without the development of a shopping center this impact will occur.' Businesses will locate in the Meridian area because of the increased regional accessibility, increase availability of a labor force within a reasonable time period, and a more economical distribution of goods and services. The probability of preserving the area between Five Mile Road'and Locust Grove Road and along the freeway for agricultural uses is remote. It is more probable that urban development will occur from Fairview Avenue to Overland and this area will fully develop within the time period of the Meridian Com- prehensive Plan. Impacts beyond these areas will be minor and can be controlled by zoning and planning tools currently available in order to preserve the open areas north of Fairview and south of Overland. Clearly development will tend, over the long term, to move toward vacant areas and avoid high cost, high density central areas. This translates simply as an increased probability of growth to the west and a much smaller amount of growth in central cities. 7 Currently there are approximately 3,.500 persons employed in the Meridian area. With the development of the planned industrial areas along the railroad 4 right-of-way, and at the intersections of Eagle, Meridian and Cloverdale, a total of 12,300 additional persons could be employed. Only a portion of these households will live in Meridian. The projected household population will occur in Meridian if each of the intersections are developed, a regional shopping center is built, and the railroad industrial areas between Meridian Road and Cloverdale are developed. COMMUNITY SELF-SUFFICIENCY The Meridian Comprehensive Plan encourages the City of Meridian to become self-sufficient and encourages the development of industrial and employment generating land uses. The Comprehensive Plan reserves land for industrial, retail and commercial/ office uses at desirable business locations and any major employers should not place undue burden or cost on the provision of urban services. Several sites have been reserved in the Comprehensive Plan for industrial development, as follows: 1. Adjoining the Ten Mile and Eagle interchange, 2. Mixed use areas south of the freeway, 3. At the interchange enterprise areas, and 4. Along the railroad right-of-way. The provision of the interchanges at Ten Mile, Eagle, Meridian and Cloverdale and utilization of the interchange enterprise area concept will assist Meridian to achieve the goal of self-sufficiency. Also, the proposed interchanges will have a positive impact upon growth of the industrial areas along the railroad right-of-way. The proposed modifications suggest that an interchange enterprise area be designated at each of the freeway interchanges. This would allow highway oriented uses and regional activities to locate at any of the interchanges. A concept plan is presented to help graphically show the possible development opportunities that exist along the freeway and the UP right-of-way. The proposed policy change of extending the urban service planning area to Cloverdale Road provides the following benefits: 1. This policy would support the objective of community self-sufficiency. 2. This policy would assist in obtaining major industrial and manufacturing uses in Meridian, by allowing private enterprise to select from. several possible sites that meet the City's economic objectives. It is recommended that the urban service planning area be expanded to include the area up to the west side of Cloverdale Road and allow industrial use to locate along the UP right-of-way and regional activities to locate at each of the interchanges. THE ENVIRONMENT The environmental impacts from extending the urban service planning area to Cloverdale Road and land use development will not be significant to this area. There are no significant environmental impacts expected due to interchange and land use development. i . HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALSCOUNCILMEN LAWANA L. NIEMANN, City Clerk CITY OF MERIDIAN GRANT P.KINGS ORD reasur BILLBREWER RICHARD D. Ni THOLS,er 728 Meridian Street RICHARD F. ORTON, JR. RICHARD D. NICHOLS, Chief of Police ' BRUCE D STUART, Water works Supt. MERIDIAN, IDAHO RONALD R. TOLSMA N JOHN O. FITZGERALD, Attorney 8 N,, ANNETTE C. HINRICHS ROGER WELKER, Fire Chef EARL WARD, Waste Water Supt. Phone 888-9433 Chairman Zoning 8 Planning JOSEPH L. GLAISYER Mayor January 25,1983 Mr. Alvin S. Marsden Marsden & Associates P.O. Box 771 Boise jdaho 83701 R.E.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request on Behalf of Property Owners Dobaran et al. Dear Al, At a special meeting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission held January 24, 1983 at the Meridian City Hall the application for the proposed amendment to the Meridian Comprehensive Plan by Marsden & Associates representing property owners of Dobaran et al. was denied. This decision may be appealed as stated in paragraph e, page 63 of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and #14 of the Conclusions. Sincerely, For Meridian Planning Zoning scion ity Cler i Enclosure: Pg.63 Comp Plan. #14 Conclusions -63- e. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall determine whether the application merits further study. All applicants shall be notified of the Commission's decision by mail. Any applicant aggrieved of this decision will have thirty (30) days from the date of notification to appeal this decision to the City Council by filing a written appeal stating the reasons for the appeal. The City Council may direct the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider any application previously rejected which the City Council, by a majority vote, deems to warrant further study. f. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold one or more public work sessions to consider those applications warranting further study. g. In October and April of each year, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing to consider all of the applications ac- cepted by it for further study by February 1st and August 1st. The Planning and Zoning Commission, after receiving the report of its committee and taking public testimony, shall consider each application on its own merit and in relation to each other application and, within thirty (30) days, shall recommend to the City Council approval or denial of each application, unless (upon written agreement of the applicant) the application is held over for consideration during the next six-month interval. h. Upon receipt of the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendations on Comprehensive Plan amendment, the City Council will set a date for public hearing of the applications. At the public hearing, the proposed amendments will be presented and the City Council will receive the report of its Committee and public testimony on each application. i. Following the public hearing, the City Council will approve or deny each application (except that with the written agreement of the ap- plicant, an additional amount of time, which shall be specified, may be taken). All applicants shall be notified by mail of the City Council's decision. j. All applications for Comprehensive Plan Amendments shall be acted upon by the City Council within sixteen (16) months from their date of filing unless, upon written agreement of the applicant, an additional amount of time may be specified, or unless the provisions of Section (k) are applicable requiring additional time for study. k. Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan may be granted only to correct an error in the Plan or because of substantial change in the actual condi- tions of an area which results in a maLerial discrepancy or disparity between the conditions in the area and all or part of the Plan. If the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that a study of the proposed application or conditions affecting the proposed application is necessary, and the necessary funds for such a study are not available, the.application may be tabled (for a one-year period) to allow the budgeting of the -nece- ssary funds for the study, unless the applicant agrees to pay in advance the estimated cost of the study. 11. gnat even disregarding the Area of Impact problem, the Commission concludes that, in light o; its prior recorurendation to the City Counci_1 to exten-1 th', USPS. boundary approf{i mately 1/2 mile east of Eagle Zoad, the further extension of the USDA boundary another 1/2 mile to the east would not be prudent without sufficient assurances that the area could be sewered with the present capacity of the sewaqe treatment plant, or an expan.ion thereof, and that sufficient water could be supplied for in,'.ustrial and fire fighting purposes . 12. Additionally, the problems of police and fire protection in the event and likelihood of annexation were not sufficiently addressed, particularly in light of the Dobaran Annexation _application which has been filed by the applicant in conjunction with this application to amend the 1978 Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 13. The Amendment Provision and Procedures of the 1978 Comprehensive Plan states that the Commission shall take an application for amendment, hold at least one public hearing and determine whether the application merits further stud,/. If the Commission determines that the application does not merit further i study, that is, the application is denied, the Commission shall so notifyi the applicant by mail and the applicant shall have 30 i days within which to appeal the decision 'to the City Council. If the Cormmission determines the application merits further stuc y, it i i shall hold at least one additional public hearing and then recom- mend to the City Council approval or denial. i 14. The Commission concludes and determines that the applica- tion of Alvin S. Marsden for amendment of the 1978 Meridian I Comprehensive Plan, as set out in the application, does not merit i further study; that the applicant may appeal this decision and these findings of fact and conclusions to the City Council within I 30 days from the date of notification of this decision. SPECIAL MEETING Meridian Plannini & Zoning Commission January 24, 1983 Special Meeting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission called to order by Chairman Bob Spencer at 8:20 pm. Members Present: Marnell Chenowith; Bob Giesler; Gerry Sweet; Tom Eddy Others Present: Wayne Crookston Jr.; Al Marsden; Jack H. Niemann Item 1 Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Dobaran et al City Attorney Wayne Crookston Jr. read the Findings of Fact and Conclusions regarding the Application for'Comprehensive Plan Amendment by Alvin S. Marsden on behalf of Dobaran, et al. (See exhibit:A, Findings of Fact and Conclusions, attached; Tape on file, City Clerk's Office) The Motion was made by Chenowith and seconded by Sweet to adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions concerning the application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment by Alvin S. Marsden on behalf of Dobaran, et al, as read. Motion Carried: Eddy, yea; Giesler,yea; Chenowith, yea; Sweet, yea Unanimous The Motion was made by Eddy and seconded by Giesler to deny the application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment by Alvin S. Marsden on behalf of Dobaran, et al. Motion Carried: Eddy, yea; Giesler,yea; Chenowith, yea; Sweet, yea Unanimous Item 2 Dobaran et al Annexation Request Planning & Zoning Chairman Bob Spencer read the Findings of Fact and Conclusions concerning the Dobaran et al Annexation request. (See Exhibit B, Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Attached; Tape on File, City Clerk's Office) The Motion was made by Sweet and seconded by Chenowith to adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions regarding the Dobaran et al Annexation request as read. Motion Carried: Eddy, yea; Giesler,yea; Chenowith, yea; Sweet, yea Unanimous The Motion was made by Eddy and seconded by Giesler to recommend to the City Council that_this annexation request be denied. Motion Carried: Eddy, yea; Giesler,yea; Chenowith,yea; Sweet, yea Unanimous Chairman Spencer informed Marsden that he would be notified in writing of the decisions of the Commission, and that he had 30 days in which to appeal the decisions of the Commission to the City Council. The Motion was made by Eddy and seconded -by Sweet to adjourn the Special Meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, January 24, 1983, at 9:02 pm. Motion Carried: Eddy, yea; Giesler,yea; Chenowith, yea; Sweet,yea APPROVED: CHAIRMAN, BOB SPENCER ATTEST: 1i (] a4NAJ__� ack H. Ni , City Clerk APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A4ENDMENT BY ALVIN S. MARSEN ON BEHALF OF DOBARAN, ET AL. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS FINDINGS OF FACT 1. This application for amendment to the 1978 Meridian Comprehensive Plan was submitted by Alvin S. Marsden as the applicant on behalf of Dobaran et al.; the application was received October 14, 1982, by the Meridian City Clerk; that a public hearing as required by the Local Land Use Planning Pact could not be scheduled until December 13, 1982, due to a lack- of a quorum on the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission. 2. That the applicant requests amendment to the 1978 Meridi Comprehensive Plan in the following particulars: A. Extend the Urban Service Planning Area (USDA) to the centerline of Cloverdale Road. B. Designate the area adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad west of Cloverdale as Industrial. C. Designate the area west of Cloverdale Road and north and South of I-84 as an Interchange Enterprise Area. D. Designate Cloverdale Road as a major arterial. 3. That a public hearing was held on December 13, 1982, concerning the proposed amendment; that notice of said hearing was published fifteen days prior to hearing as required by law; that said hearing was open to the public; that the Planning and Zoning Commission held a special meeting workghop on January 5, 1983, to consider 'the proposed amendment which special meeting workshop was duly noticed by publication prior to the special meeting; that notices of both meetings were available to papers, radio and television stations. AMBROSE, FITZGERALD & CROOKSTON Attomep and Counselors EL[BlrT "An P.o.Box 4Z7 P&Z M1=1NG 1/24/83 mermian, Mato 12. Pages' 63M Telephone tiw4al AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attorneys and Counselors P.O.9ox Q? Meridian, Idaho 838!2 Telephone 8881481 • The west boundary being the Ada -Canyon County line; the north boundary being Highway 20; the east boundary being Cloverdale Road until such point as Cloverdale reaches the Interstate -Overland Area, then including the Five - Mile, Eight -Mile and Ten -Mile Creek Drainage areas, but in no event shall it extend east past Cole Road or the New York Canal, whichever is closest; and bounded on the south being generally following the Rawson Canal .to the point it intersects with the Ada -Canyon County line. However, the Area of Impact has not been negotiated, as required by 67-6526, Idaho Code, by the City of Meridian and Ada County or the City of Boise; that Ada County has not adopted the Meridian Area of Impact by means of an Ordinance. -9. That Ada County has -adopted the Boise City Area of Impact by means of County Ordinance 126; that said. Area of Impact of_ the -City of Boise extends at least to the quarter section line west of Cloverdale Raod; thus, the duly adopted Area of Impact of the City of Boise overlaps at least a quarter of a mile onto the Area of Impact.of the City of.Meridian which has only been adopted by the City of. Meridian, but not by Ada County. 10. That a large portion of the land where the applicant proposes Meridian's USPA be extended to is now included in -the Area of Impact of the City of Boise. 11. That the application sets forth as the one overriding si nificant change which has occurred and which results in a material descrepancy between the 1978 Comprehensive Plan and present existing conditions is the proposed construction of an interstate - interchange at I-84 and Cloverdale Road; that the application for amendment is basically grounded and based upon the addition of the interchange at Cloverdale Road. 12. That the applicant, in testimony and the application, indicated that the intended development included in the area which the proposed extension of the USPA would include would be indus- trial; that the City of Meridian now has within its City limits AMBROSE, FITZGERALD A CROOKSTON ,, _ Att�cmeWy��and _ o n n,.. a6i ARIDU TalepAo� 88&MBt Road, one in the planning stage. at I-84 and Eagle Road, and one in the planning stage - at I-84 and Cloverdale Road; that at the time =of the adoption of the 1978 Meridian Comprehensive Plan, there was only the one interchange 'at Meridian Road. 17. That it is the goal of the Commission to encourage regional enterprises; that regional.enterprises require and tend to locate where there are sufficient transportation facilities such as railway and freeway access; that Meridian has in its Area of Impact, as adopted by Meridian but not approved by Ada County, three, one at Meridian Road, and two under planning at Eagle Road and Cloverdale Road; that the best possible locations for regional enterprises -are at freeway interchanges where access to the freeway is the best; that the -City of Boise and Ada County now have, however, included the Cloverdale Interchange Enterprise_Area within the Boise Area of Impact. 18-: That the present capacity of the Meridian Sewage Treat- ment Facility is for a population equivalent to 21,000; that current utilization -is a population. -equivalence of 7,000; that the plant.has the capability -of being expanded to serve an approximate population equivalence of 42,000; that in order to serve all the annexed property in the City of Meridian, the sewer treatment plant would have to have a capacity of approximately 50,000 population equivalence; that not all annexed property would require sewer service at one time; to allow growth, either residential, commer- cial, or industrial, additional means of treating sewage will have to be developed, publicly or privately, to compliment service by the existing plant. 19. That water service to the land in the proposed extension of the USPA could be handled by means of additional wells; that -a - - `u �. `�'.•R �'�. Z � ._.� � - _ Fav' � r y .�y. C�__ 5 AMBROSE, FITZGERALD SCROOKSTON Attorneys end Couneebre P.O. Box 427 C�eridlen, idelw 89012 dephom3 885.4/81 L� 0 25. That the Amendment would have little affect on housing since there already is an abundance of available building lots. 26. There would be no impact on hazardous areas or special areas or recreation due to the Amendment.- and the Commission felt there was no comment necessary on natural resources. 27. The Amendment would have no, or at least minimal, affect on the soils. 28. The Community design would not be significantly changed. 29. That there was no public input on the proposed Amendment. CONCLUSIONS P 1. That all the requirements of the 1978 Meridian Comprehen- sive Plan Amendment Provision and Procedures and of the Weal Land Use Planning Act, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho -Code, including all notice requirements and planning considerations have been met; that the requirements of.Secton 67-6508, Idaho Code, have been consider ed. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan is designed for the planning of the City of Meridian and its Area of Impact as adopted in Ordinance No. 319.- 3. That the 1978 Meridian Comprehensive Plan was adopted pursuant to the Local Land Use Planning Act, Title 67, -Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and all requirements of that act have been met and were complied with. 4. That in considering any amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, the goals and policies of the present plan must be looked to and considered; that all such goals and policies have been con- sidered; that the following listed goals and policies are considere AMBROSE, FITZGERALD BCROOKSTON Attomelre an0 Counselor P.0.6=427 McAdlen. Idaho 83842 Telephone 88&1481 F_ L1 4. Uses in the rural areas of the Urban Service Planning Area not scheduled for urban services (municipal sewer and water facilities and other essential services) should be maintained in agricultural use until such land has been identified as part of a City capital improvement program for development. 5. That the above goals and policies, particularly that support should: be given.to existing industrial areas and that .industrial development within the City limits should receive the highest priority, in conjunction;..with the finding that there are already over 800 acres of industrial zoned property within the City.limits, a significant amount of which is undeveloped, dictate that the USPA should"not.be extended any further to the east and -that the area adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad west of Cloverdale Road should not be designated as Industrial. 6. That the Commission may take judicial notice of State laws, City and County Ordinances, and economic conditions and of governmental actions, policies, and decisions, including its own, and may consider knowledge obtained in considering prior amend- ments and duplication -is to be avoided; that the Commission specifically takes notice of the Dobaran Annexation application which includes land extending to Cloverdale Road. 7. That no public need for or benefit from the proposed amendment was shown significant enough to warrant, the adoption of the amendment; that the 'representations as to public need were -_-- speculative and based in large part upon the proposed construction of an interchange at I-84 and Cloverdale Road, which will be dis- cussed below. 8. That the applicant maintains that one significant change has occurred within the Area of Impact which is a material change necessitating the adoption of the applicant's amendment and that being that the construction of an Interchange at I-84 and - .` 4 .e T- iV Y ! w AMBROSE,' F TZC,ERAID b CROOKSTON x McNdlen, h]elw" Telephone 88644W 11. That even .disregarding the Area of Impact problem, the Commission concludes that, in light of its prior recommendation to the City Council to extend the USPA boundary approximately 1/2 mile.east of Eagle Road, the further extension of the USPA boundaryanother 1/2 mile to the east would not be prudent without sufficient assurances that the area could be.sewered with the present capacity of the sewage treatment plant, or an expansion thereof, and that sufficient water could be supplied for -industrial and fire fighting purposes. 12. Additionally, the problems of police and fire protection in the event and likelihood of annexation were not sufficiently addressed, particularly in light of the Dobaran Annexation applica- tion which -has been filed by the applicant in conjunction with this application to amend the 1578 Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 13. The Amendment Provision :and Procedures of the 197-8 Comprehensive Plan states that the Commission shall ,take an application.for amendment, hold at least one public hearing and determine whether the -application merits further study. If the Commission determines that the -application does not merit further study, that is, the application is denied, the Commission shall so notify the applicant by mail and the applicant shall have 30 days within which to appeal the decision to -the City Council. If, the Commission determines the application merits further study, it shall hold at least one additional public hearing and -then recom- mend to the City Council approval or denial. 14. The Commission concludes and determines that the appli- cation of ;Alvin S. Marsden on behalf of Dobaran, et al. for amendment to the 1978 Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as set out.in s - r L is AMBROSE, FITZGERALD &CROOKSTON Attomeye en ! Couneelote PA. Box 427 WaTkIlan, Idaho 83642 Telepharo 8084491 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DOBARAN et al. ANNEXATION FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The above entitled annexation having come on for consideration on January 24, 1983, at the hour of 8:0.0 o'clock p.m., at the Meridian City Hall, 728 Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Commission having held prior hearings and meetings and having heard and taken oral and written testimony and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of the special meeting on the annexation was duly published in the ,Valleg News for one (1) issue; that notice of a public hearing on the annexation was published for two (2) consecutive -weeks prior to the public hearing scheduled for November 8, 1982, the first of which publication was 15 days prior to the hearing; that the hearing on November 8, 1982 was convened but<_due to a lack of a quorum and at the applicants request the matter was tabled until December 13, 1982; that notice of a public hearing on the matter was duly published for two consecutive weeks prior to the public hearing scheduled for December 13, 1982, the first of which publication was 15 days prior -to December 13, 1982; that additionally, a workshop was held on a connected Comprehensive Plan Amendment and this annexatidn on January 5, 1983, notice of which was published; that copies of all notices were made availble to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That the Planning and Zoning Commission (P & Z Comm.) received both oral and written testimony. d ' 1?&Z`'Mi'TNG`1/24/83 a 5 Pages AMBROSE, F17ZGERALD & CROOKSTON ;i Woo telephone 888.4481 extends one quarter mile _west of -Cloverdale Road which would in-. clude a large portion of the area requested to be annexed. 8. That almost -the entire area included within the annexa- tion is not,included within.the Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the 1978 Comprehensive Plan; that some of the land included in the annexation easterly'of ..Eagle Road does abutt the Urban. Service Planning Area boundary; that the Urban Service Planning Area boundary is not a definite line of demarcation. -9. That Alvin S. Marsden on behalf of Dobaran, et al. has p filed an application for °a Comprehensive :Plan. Amendment that would -extend the Urban Service `planning Area to .Cloverdale Road, which extension would cause this annexation to be in compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan; that the Commission hereby takes judicial notice -of the.file and record -on the application of Alvin S. Marsden on behalf of Dobaran,:et al. -for amendment to the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and the Findings of Fact and Conclu- sions and Decision maderotherein. 10. That since the amendment proposed by Mr. Marsden on be- half of Dobaran, et al. to the Comprehensive Plan ha.s been denied, the area proposed to be annexed in this application is not in compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. CONCLTjS TONS 1. The City has authority to annex land pursuant to 50-2224, I daho Code. 2. That all the land within the proposed annexation is con- tiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian, even though all.parcels rely on a domino effect to meet the contiguous requirement; that is, if it were not for an adjacent parcel being contiguous, the next parcel would not be contiguous. ¢t 3. Stt AP.".f � 4 ,� •�''.: _ '` � � � y'F } k ��' :yr R M 3.�.�..� m'+ F'J`,y Y. k ���! us � x .7t '; e$ ;r Yr{ c ..Y `� E s.r �4 r s + w' � ♦ t �. _ AMBROSE, FITZGERALD 6CROOKSTON Attomeysenil Counaeton A.O. Box 127 Menela % Idaho 63012 Telephone 600.1161 9. That additionally, the fact that there are over 800 acres of industrial property already within the City limits, most of whict is undeveloped and not in use and in closer proximity to the City, . and the fact the existing Comprehensive Plan states that development of industrial property within the City limits should receive the highest priority, dictate that the Commission cannot recommend the annexation of this property at this time. 10. That with the denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the annexation and the area included therein.is not in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, and, therefore, the annexation must l be denied. The wording and interpretation of 'Idaho Code, k67-6526 require the above in that it indicates that any annexed area must comply with the present Comprehensive Plan or with a subsequent but concurrent amendment allowing the annexation and its zoning. Since the Commission has seen fit to deny the amendment which would allow] the annexation, the annexation must likewise fail. APPROVAL,OF FINDINGS OF FACT.AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. Roll Call Commissioner Eddy ' Voted yea. Commissioner Geisler Voted Commissioner Chenowith Voted yea Commissioner Sweet Voted " Yeah Chairman Spencer (Tie Breake'r) Voted DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that this annexation request be denied based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions. Motion: Approved ALL YEA Disapproved r ridian Planning & Zonin Item 1 IItem 2 Item 3 Item 4 Meeting called to order by Member Bob Spencer at 8:00 p.m. Members Present: Bob Spencer; Bob Giesler; Marnell Chenowith; Gerry Sweet Members Absent: Tom Eddy Others Present: Al Marsden; Annette Hinrichs; Jack Niemann; Penny Webb Elect Chairman of Planning & Zoning Commission r 13, 1982 The Motion was made by Chenowith and seconded by Giesler to elect Bob Spencer as Chairman of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission. There were no other nominations. Motion Carried: Giesler, yea; Chenowith, yea; Sweet, yea; Minutes of previous meeting held October 12, 1982 Spencer explained that he had gone over the minutes and had no problem with them. (None of the other Commission Members were on the Commission at the time of the October 12, 1982 meeting.) The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Sweet to approve the minutes of the October 12, 1982 meeting. Motion Carried: Giesler, yea; Chenowith, yea; Sweet, yea; Minutes of previous meeting held November 8, 1982 Spencer stated that this was the meeting that there was no quorum. The Motion was made by Sweet and seconded by Chenowith to approve the minutes of the November 8, 1982 meeting. Motion Carried: Giesler, yea; Chenowith, yea; Sweet, yea; Annette Hinrichs - Imput Concerning the Local Land Use Planning Act Hinrichs explained that she had attended a conference in Idaho Falls held by the League of Women Voters concerning the Local Land Use Planning Act, and how it was working around the State. Hinrichs went on to explain that the League of Women Voters is a non- partisan group that studies the issues. They have taken a position in support of the Local Land Use Planning Act. The League is interested in seeing that the Local Land Use Planning Act works. The League would like Hinrichs to act as a liaison between them and the Planning and Zoning Commission, making them aware of what is happening in other places in the State and what bills will be comming up to the Legislature that concern Land Use Planning. Public Hearing : Comprehensive Plan Admendment and Dobaran et al Annexation Al Marsden was present to represent the property owner. Marsden: "I'm Al Marsden, I reside at 7840 Lakeview Place. I'm here in behalf of the property owners, in view of this request for annexation. The purpose of the request ` is to allow the property to be developed industrial, and to be able to allow the City of Meridian " "the subject parcel of property is located right in this location (Pointed to map) the City limits ,and boundaries today exist along this line down to F&irview Avenue. The purpose of this request is to allow industrial development. The application is about 160 to 180 acres, and the property owners.have come together because there are some small parcels, that they collectively would like to develop appropriately into one common use. The City of Meridian has three major assets. These assets are not available, and are not available to the extent in any other City in this area except for Boise. Those assets could include the freeway, I84; the RailRoad Tracks,' that goes right through the town; -and available land for development." Meridian Planning & Zoni 13. 1982 Item 4 Cont'd Public Hearing Comprehensive Plan Admendment, Dobaran et al Annexation . . . . . . . Marsden Cont'd. . . "The freeway, by it's very nature, can travel across the Country, any place in the United States^ you will find that most development occurs and congregates around the freeway location, particularly when there are interchanges that have been developed, or in the process of being developed. And also industrial develop ment has a tendency to congregate around the.RailRoad Tracks. In this particular case, where say Meridian had been developed a Comprehensive Plan in the past, to take advantage of these three main assets that Meridian City has." "The City in the past adopted an area of impact to.Cloverdale, they currently have their boundaries at this line right here (pointed to map). Recently, the Planning and Zoning Commission passed a Comprehensive Plan Admendment, changing the Urban Service Planning Area, to allow Urban development to occur. Basically my position, because of the freeway interchanges that are going to occur, and because of the major access along the RailRoad Track, that these locations that are industrial developed, designed to be developed that way, carry on major employment centers. According to your Comprehensive Plan, you basically sai.d that you would like to be a self-sufficient community. The Comprehensive Plan encourages Industral and commercial development,.so that you can be a self-sufficient community. The purpose of our application is to help the City of Meridian achieve that goal." "This particular location is very compatiable with the intents of the Comprehensive Plan." Marsden displayed maps concerning the impact area, and the proposed annexation. Marsden pointed out several items on the maps. (Tape on File, City Clerk's Office) Marsden also displayed a map of the Boise Area and explained the proposed growth areas according to the Boise Comprehensive Plan. (Tape on File City Clerk's Office) Marsden: "Freeway interchanges basically take on a character of being a congregator or encouraging regional activities. Regional activities meaning hospitals, everything up to regional functions that serve the population, while in addition to that, they serve the user of this major transportation corp when they go through the State. In Boise you will find that almost every one of them, adjacent to the freeway, has regional activities, that serve large population growth, none of a community size. One of the things of the Meridian Plan was to stimulate and encourage industrial development along the RailRoad Tracks." "One of the things that the Planning and Zoning Commission have recently done, -,.is to expand the Urban Service Planning Area, so it goes some place between Eagle Road and Cloverdale Road, which covers this particular parcel. Because the State Highway Department and the U.S. Government has currently approved an interchange at Cloverdale, and approved an interchange at Eagle Road, the Industrial development along these major arterials will encourage very intense regional/industrial activity. The transportation points between these two areas are exactly in the center of the entire region. These two interchanges are time distance factor, as well as serving the population of the total region, this is the center of the region." "This will do alot for Meridian. It allows it to havea stronger tax base, it allows it to have employment for its employees, the people that live in the City, so that they don't have to travel all over the County for employment, and provides a balanced community in both services and functions. Until this property is developed the sewer and water systems that need to serve it, will not be necessary." Marsden demostrated to the Commission as to the location of the Water/Sewer lines on the map. (Tape on File; City Clerk's Office) Marsden refered to the comments and requirements received by ACRD. (Letter on File) "ACRD would like to have Emerald Street come down through the property and continue on, so that on some long term basis, they can tie it (Emerald) into Pine Street. That would provide basically a collector road"on both sides of the industrialarea, all the way through." Marsden again refered to the map of the proposed annexation. "What we are intending to do is a schematic approach to this property, to take the Water and Sewer down'Pine extension, so that we would be able to develop very large parcels along the RailRoad Track." "This would be tracts the size we are talking about - 5, 10, 15 acreas in size. This would cultivate big users, it has more room to have more orientation to.manufacturing functions." Marsden: The ability of the City to provide Fire protection is related to°two issues. Distance of travel, and availability of'Water:.source service. Since we will provide adequate water system to serve this property area,.the concern of the County/Rural system is what is the time distance factor to serve this property? Since the property is all ready adjacentj': to the City Limits, they all ready have to provide service when this developes to this location. With this particular access system, it is very simple to extend the City Limit boundary Road. Item number two is that not a matter of distance is the key issue. The key issue is, a residential house anywhere, it's Meridian Plannii & Zoning 3., December 1 1982 (Item 4 Cont'd Public Hearing Comprehensive Plan Admendment, Dobaran et al Annexation . . . . . Marsden Cont'd . . . "basic fire protection system is totally related as to when the Fire Truck arrives. In commercial building, primarily industrial, since they are totally sprinkled - it is a requirement of ail.the Building Codes and Fire Codes that all major r_commercial buildings, particularly -when they have large employment alot of manufacturin they have automatic sprinklers. The advantages of commercial and industrial buildings is that it provides a system of protection. So, the response time, or the distance, is not the key issue. The system has all ready been activated and the fire has all ready been put out in most cases." "The commercial or industrial building can be of further distance, but still have the equalivant fire protection." Marsden: "What I have done, in order to assist your job, making a decision to submit a recommendation to the City Council, I have prepared a preliminary statement which is basically a statement that can be interpreted as the basis of the Facts of Finding. If you read that, it covers most of the items that I have talked about, but did not cover some of the major concepts that I presented. One of the things that I want to emphasize is that the public services of Meridian can serve this property better than any other City in the area." (Letter included in Annexation Request; On file -City Clerk's Office) Chairman Spencer: "I will now open the Public Hearing..: Are there any questions or comments from the Public concerning the Admendment to the Comprehensive Plan or the proposed Dobaran et al Annexation?" There was no response. Spencer: "Public Hearing closed." Commission Member Chenowith: "Mr. Marsden, can you tell me why you feel that there is a need now for this annexation?" Marsden: "There are three reasons why it is necessary to do it now instead of next year or the year afterwards. Currently we are trying to work with some major users out of State, and trying to encourage them to locate in this area. Before they will even talk to us or be able to communicate with us, we have to have property that they feel assured that will come forth. One of the major obstacles in Idaho is the availabilty of land. ready for development. If you are going to spend the kind of money that we have to spend in order to encourage some of these major manufactures to locate here, we have to have the parcels. Number two, is that the development process right now has slowed down everywhere. There is hardly any economic development activity going on. Usually the development process that we are talking about takes 2 to 5 years to accomplish a project like this. To find financing, to build the roads, to get the tenants, sell the property and fully develop the parcels is going to take that long. The economy is going to turn around, and we have to be ready to achieve that objective by hiring engineers, achieving all the physical requirements, particularly the property, we want to be ahead of the market place. " "The third reason is that the property owners need to be able to sit down and establish the rules of the game at this,,tftne. The holding costs of property like this is several thousand dollars a month. It doesn't make sense for these property -owners to hold on to these properties and take the financial burden without some understanding of what Government is going to do, regard to approval or not of this property. They felt that is was time -now -to do that from their standpoint." Marsden explained to the Commission that until the property developes there would be no additional costs to the City. "There won't be any additional crime there, because the are no building facilities.Thereis no additional fire protection, there might be a grass fire, but they would have to put that out anyway, it's the same Fire District. There are no additional administrative services there because there are no functions to administrate. The only time you have additional costs to the City is when you have development." Spencer: "On Page 63,. paragraph k. in the Comprehensive Plan it states "Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan may be granted only to correct an error in the Plan or because of substantial change in the actual conditions of an area which results in a material discrepancy or disparity between the conditions in the area and all or part of the Plan." Can you elaborate on what you feel the changes are in the Plan between now and when the Plan was adopted?" C. Planninq & Zonin 4 • r 13. 1982 ''tem 4 Cont'd Public Hearing Comprehensive Plan Admendment, Dobaran et al Annexation . . . . . . Marsden: "Changes have been made because of the State Highway Dept. have identified. . . First of all., let me say that I think that it has always been Meridian's policy to encourage industrial development along the RailRoad Tracks, but the State Highway Department designating both Cloverdale and Eagle Road major arterials for regional inter- regional activity to the North as well as in development in two interchanges, changed the picture of this area. It was not an error in the Plan, there -was a change of circumstances." Spencer: "The other thing is that number,5, under paragraph b, "Documentation that no other solutions to the problem presented by the current policy of the Plan are possible or reasonable" (referring to Comprehensive Plan) in the light that the Plan is for industrial technical review areas, and should the Plan Admendments that are all ready before the Council get approved, we will have two freeway enterprise areas. Can you expand on what your area has that the other industrial review areas don't have?" Marsden: "The Union Pacific Property does not have Railroad Tracks. The enterprise areas identified around the interchanges do not have Railroad Track activity. The industrial area that is proposed to.the South, between Meridian Road and Eagle Road, does not have any Railroad Track activity functional connections." "This particular parcel of land is different than the tech -center area as identified North of the freeway, it is totally different than the enterprise area adjacent to the freeway interchanges, and it is compliment, an extension of the current industrial activity that has occured at these different locations. The availability of land in this category is minor compared to the availability of industrial land in the entire region. Most of the indulstrial area identified on the map for the entire region.is all ready developed along the Railroad Tracks." Marsden pointed out the developed areas on the map. (Tape on File City Clerk's Office). The access to these areas will not be as good, for the long term regional function, access to Eagle Road and Cloverdale Road, unless these interchanges are provide Because of that, you will see in this stretch of land high intensive uses that are owing to manufacturing serving the entire region from a regional industrial standpoint. That is why this land is different than any of the other parcels." Chenowith: "Is there no reason why that when you get people in here that are committed to put in some kind of facility, that you can't come to us then?" Marsden: "There is no way that I can do that. I am not going to spend the money, my clients are not going to spend the money to pull these people in unless I have a real assurance that you will take action. The game is not played the other way around. I can not afford to do it." Commission Member Sweet: "My question is along the same line as Marnell's (Chenowith). Specifically who is interested in these particular parcels, and the manufacturing aspect, what kind of manufacturing, a little more specific than what I have heard. Marsden again stated that he had no specific commitments, -and cited several examples of what type of manufacturing might be suitable for this location. (Tape on File City Clerk's Office) "At this time we do not have any firm commitments." Chenowith: "You see in our Comprehensive Plan that it is our intent to stimulate manufacturing?" Marsden: "I see in your Comprehensive Plan, without any question, to encourage employment in the community.of.both manufacturing warehouse and any kind of industrial activity that will stimulate that function in you town, so that the town can be self sufficient. In others words, provide a place to work, -=a place t6 shop." Chenowith: "That is how you see it, but do you think that that is what our Comprehensive Plan says?" Marsden: "That is what is says specifically. Specifically I read:the words, and that is what it says to me.' Marsden read from the Comprehensive Plan (page 14) "The main goal of economic development , it says "Stimulate, encourage, and give preference to those types of economic activities and developments which provide opportunities for the employ- ment of Meridian citizens and area residents and reduce the need for persons to commute to neighboring cities:', that is the primary goal that the City of Meridian has adopted. In the details of it is says "The City of Meridian shall make every effort to create a positive atmosphers, which encourages industrial and commercial enterprises to locate in Meridian" (page 15, #1); that is what it says. I don't know how else to interpet it. It also says it is the policy of the City of Meridian to set aside areas where commercial and industrial interest and activities are to dominate" (Page 15, #2). It then goes on from there." ridian P inq & Zoni • • December 13. 1982 Item 4 Cont'd Public Hearing Comprehensive Plan Admendment, Dobaran et al Annexation . . . . . The Motion was made by Bob Giesler to table the Comprehensive Plan Admendment request until further study could be looked into. Spencer: "We can recommend annexation first. But if that is our choice, then the Comprehensive Plan Admendment must go with it. You can't have one without the other, if we recommend for annexation. We can recommend for the Comprehensive Plan Admendment with out recommending annexation, or we can turn down the Comprehensive Plan Admendment and therefore automatically turn down the annexation because we can not have the annexation without the Comprehensive Plan Admendment.' What comes first the annexati©d or the Comprehensive P1an.Admendment does not really mean anything. They both have to come within a relatively short time of each other, if we recommend approval of both, or approval of the annexation. The only thing that we can not .have is recommendation of approval of the annexation and denial of the Comprehensive Plan Admendment. Chenowith: "Mr. Marsden can you explain to me as to why you think we should amend the Comprehensive Plan?" Marsden: "From my standpoint, I don't know if you have to amend your Comprehensive Plan or not. Because the line that the Planning Commission recommended to City Council was . an arbitrary line it was not fixed on any dimensional point. What I am saying to you is that the Urban Service Planning Area previously was Eagle'Road, simply.it said that. - Now, the Comprehensive Plan line is some place in here, and there is no exact interpret*: ation of where,in fact the map that has been adopted has no scale on it, and it is very possible that it covers the entire area. So to me, when'I submitted my application, for both the annexation and the Comprehensive Plan Admendment, I wanted to make sure that I covered myself. Interpretation of your line specifically is not precise. Currently if you drew the line there, half the project would be in the Urban Service Planning Area, if you draw it here, then 3/4 of the project would be in the Urban Service Planning Area. If you look at the map that the Planning Commission., as my interpretation, was submitted to the City Council, I'm not sure if it needs to be amended"or not. I submitted the application because I wanted to make sure." Spencer: "If you look at the testimony and the conclusions of the Planning and Zoning Commission, I agree with you that that line was not met to be a set line, but the Planning and Zoning Commission and all the testimony never met for that line to go to Cloverdale. The meaning that the Commission and all the testimony came up with was a line somewhere half wayin-between." Marsden: "Your current policies all ready cover the basis function that I would like to place on the property. The only thing that you need to admend is the Urban Service Plan Boundary." There was discussion concerning the interpretation of the Urban Service P1an.Boundary Line:- (Tape on File, City Clerk's Office) Giesler stated that he would like his motion to stand that the request be tabled until further study could be made, and that the Commission hold a work study on the matter. There was discussion.among the member as to when it would be convient to hold the work session. It was decided that the work shop would be held on January 5, 1983 at 8:00 p.m. The Motion to table the request for an Admendment,to the Comprehensive study could be completed, and that the Commission hold a work session January 5, 1983 was seconded by Sweet. Motion Carried: Chenowith, yea; Giesler, yea; Sweet, yea Plan until further at 8:00 p.m.on than Planning & Zoni r 13, 1982 tem 4 Cont'd Public Hearing Comprehensive Plan Admendment; Dobaran et al Annexation . . . . . The Motion was made by Chenowith and seconded by Giesler to table the Dobaran et al Annexation request until next regular -meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission January 10, 1983. Motion Carried: Chenowith, yea; Giesler, yea; Sweet, yea City Clerk Jack Niemann offic ally welcomed the new Commission Members to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Spencer.:_ "Is.there any other business to come before the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission this evening?" There was no response. Being there no other business to come before the Commission . . The Motion was made by Chenowith and seconded by Sweet to adjourn at 9:25 p.m. Motion Carried: Chenowith, yea; Giesler, yea; Sweet, yea Regular meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning adjourned at 9:25 p.m. APPROVED: Bob Spencer, Chairman ATTEST: Jack H. Niemann, City Clerk pc: Mayor & Council (5) P&Z Commission (5) City Clerk, City Building Inspector City Engineer, City TreasurerAttorney Bruce Stuart, Earl Ward, Y Y Chief of Police; Gus Hein Valley News, Press Tribune Statesman Ada County Commissioners ACHD; APA: CDH Ada County Zoning Director Nampa -Meridian Irrigation File - Dobaran et al Annexation Mail - Al Marsden N -idian Planning & Zonin November 8, 1982 LaWana Niemann, City Clerk: "This is a regular meeting night of Planning & Zoning, November 8, 1982, there is not a quorum." "I will however, call roil call of the Commission Members that are present." Niemanh': ";Bobi Spencer`.' Spender: "Here." Miiemann: "Tom Eddy." Eddy: "Here." Others Present: Wayne Crookston, Jr.; Al S. Marsden; Jack Niemann Agen da 1 PUBLIC HEARING - Dobaran Annexation Spencer: "We do have a Public Hearing on the Annexation Request for Dobaran. Due to the lack of a quorum, we will not be able to take any action on this annexation." "I can give you two choices. One, you can present testimony tonight, it will be taped and transcribed for further study, or you can ask that this annexation request be tabled until our next regular meeting in which we hopefully will have a quorum to hear. That will either be in December or January at the latest. Al Marsden: "Mr. Chairman, I am Al Marsden, representing the property owner." "My desire is to have the Commission make a recommendation to the.City Council for approval of this annexation request, but since you do not have a quorum, I would ask that this item be tabled for further consideration in work sessions with the Planning and Zoning Commission at a time appropriately that you can have,a quorum." "I am ready and able to make our presentation in behalf of the properG owners at any time the Commission so desires to hear our testimony." Spencer: "I suggest we table this request until our meeting on December 13, 1982, providing that there is a quorum. If there is no quorum that night then we will take it up in our January meeting, or first meeting that the Commission has a quorum." Marsden: "Mr Chairman is it possible that once a Commission has been appointed that because this is on the table, that a special tneeting be handled for a work session so that you can take action on it as soon as possible?" City Attorney, Wayne'Crookston: "The Commission can have a work session at any time as long as there is some public notice. In order to have the prerequisite of a Public Hearing for the annexation, they can have that at any time as long as there is the prior 15 day notice." Spencer: "I think that our timing is such that if we don't have a quorum by our Decembe meeting, I doubt very much if we will have a quorum in time to get it done any faster th our January meeting." There was discussion concerning the time table of the appointment of the new Commission Members. (Tape on File - City Clerk's Office) Marsden: "The property owner desires the process as quickly as possible." Spencer: "We understand that." "When possible, we will proceed on it as fast as possit Spencer closed the meeting at 8:25 p.m. ATTEST: LaWana L. Niemann, City Clerk ' APPROVED: BOB SPENCER, COMMISSION MEMBER . PLANNING October 1211, 1982 1 CONSULTANTS Mrs. Annette Hinrichs, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Meridian City Hall Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Annexation Request Dear Mrs. Hinrichs: OCT 1' EV Attached are letters of property owners requesting annexation to the City of Meridian. This request for industrial zoning will enable the property owners to develop their property into industrial uses. Industrial uses are compatible to the Union Pacific annexation zoning and the Union Pacific Railroad. The proposed annexation is also compatible and complementary to the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. For your information, attached are the following items: 1. Letters -requesting annexation. 2. Legal descriptions of each parcel. 3. Map at a scale of V=300' identifying each parcel and the area to be annexed. Water and sewer chains will be connected from the existing system and are proposed to follow the Union Pacific Railroad at a size sufficient to accommodate growth and development on the parcels and surrounding areas. These facilities will be constructed using the city's standard sewer and water extension policies. Any special services and equipment (lift stations, etc.) will be installed and maintained by the developer or user. If a land owner or user develops to a parcel before these mains are extended, as an interium measure, dryline sewers will be installed and septic tanks used if CDH approval is obtained. The following itmes are presented: 1. That the property included in the Application for annexation is described in the attachments and that the property generally lies North of Interstate 84 in Section 9, T. 3N.31 R. 1E., B.M., and it includes parcels of land on both sides of Union Pacific Railroad. 410 S ORCHARD, SUI I E 1 ib BOISE, IDAHO 8379 TELEPHONE (208) 344-4343 Urban and Regional Planning, Urban Design, Project Plans, Ordinances, Transportation Planning, Environmental Assessments, and Special Studies Page Two October 12, 1982 Re: Annexation Request 2. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits; that it connects and abutts the City limits at its initial point for a distance of over 1500 feet; that all parcels included in the annexa- tion rely on continuous abutting boundaries to meet the contiguous require- ment; that no common boundary for any parcel is less than 250 feet if possible. 3. That owners of all properties included in the application have petitioned and requested the City for annexation with the exception of the owners of that property known as Hollister annexation and Idaho Power annexation. These parcels are five acres or less in size. 4. That all properties included in the application have petitioned to have their property zoned "D" Industrial upon annexation. 5. That the property included in the annexation is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian as adopted by Ordinance 319. 6. That the area included within the annexation is not included within the Urban Service Planning Area as the Urb an Service Planning Area was defined in the 1978 Comppehensive Plan; but much of the land included in the annexation easterly of Eagle Road does abutt the Urban Service Planning Area boundary; that the Urban Service Planning Area boundary was easterly of Eagle Road; that the Urban Service Planning Area boundary is not a definit line of demarcation but is solely as a guideline for Urban Service Planning. 7. That the P&Z Commission has adopted Amendments to the 1978 Comprehensive Plan that would remove violations in that portion of the annexation west of Eagle Road; that the Comprehensive Plan Amendments have been adopted by the P&Z Commission and recommended to the City Council for approval, bu the City Council has taken no action on those Amendments. 8. That the Idaho Department of Transportation has decided to plan and construct an interstate interchange at the intersection of I-84 and Eagle Road; and submitted an application for approval of an interchange at Cloverdale Road and I-84; that along with a freeway interchange will come development of one kind or another as a result of access to the freeway; that Cloverdale Road, Eagle Road, Franklin Road and Overland Road are major arterials within the Area of Impact and a portion of them are already within the City Limits; that the traffic along Eagle Road, Franklin Road and Overland Road already impacts the City of Meridian. 9. That the annexation land drains to the west and any sewage disposal other than a public system would infiltrate into the well water available to the City of Meridian which relies on well water; additionally, the area can be sewered by means of gravity flow. 10. That the present capacity of the Meridian Sewage Treatment Plant is for a population equivalent of 21,000; that current utilization is a population equivalence of 7,000; that the plant has the capability of being expanded to serve a popualtion equivalence of approximately 42,000; that in order to serve all the previously annexed property in the City of Page Three October 12, 1982 Re: Annexation Request Meridian, the sewer treatment plant would have to have a capacity of approximately 50,000 population equivalence; that not all previously annexed property or the property in this annexation request would develop at one time and, thus, require sewer service at one time; that all property within the City Limits will develop gradually, especially in the present economic times, giving the City and private enterprise time to resolve any sewer needs; that the City can presently provide sewage treatment to all the land of this annexation, if it were the first area in the City limits to construct connection lines and hook-up to the present sewage treatment facilities; at the present time, there is an available sewage use of 14,000 equivalent popualtion; that the proposed industrial area, only, would require the use of 500-1000 population equivalence. 11. Water service can be supplied to the land in this annexation, but as additional development and use.occurs, new wells may have to be developed with public and/or private funds in the proposed annexation area. 12. The addition of this land will have a significant impact on the City police and fire departments which must immediately supply coverage upon annexation; that the costs to the City for fire and police protection will increase as a result of the annexation immediately; that this problem must be immediately addressed. 13. Economic development of the proposed annexation area would be encouraged by the availability of public water and sewer; however, even without public water and sewer, the annexation area, particularly along the Union Pacific Railroad, is going to be developed. 14. The present land use of the proposed annexation area is almost entirely agricultural, and with the construction of the interchanges, this land use will change. 15. That any development in the proposed annexation area would increase the tax base of the City; that developments of a commercial or industrial nature would increase the tax base in a fashion that is more desirable than residential, considering the cost of services to the area; that is, it would cost less to provide City service to a industrial area per tax dollar obtained from the use than it does for a residential area per tax dollar. 16. That any economic development in the area is going to add some jobs; that development of industrial uses in the proposed annexation area would add a significant boost to the Area of Impact's employment and income. 17. That the Ordinances and policies of the City already require that any developer or owner pay for extension of water and sewer lines and the associated connection fees. 0 Page Four October 12, 1982 Re: Annexation Request • 18. That the Area of Impact and the City of Meridian, particularly, are in need of a boost to the economic conditions; that the construction and of industrial uses would aid the City economically by providing j obs bringing in added revenue. 19. That the developer of any land in the City limits is required to pay for the extension of City services; that the route of sewer and water extension to the proposed industrial area is along the Union Pacific Rail- road; and that the City will not pay for extension of sewer and water lines. 20. That the proposed industrial uses are in compliance with and is encouraged by the 1978 Meridian Comprehensive Plan and as Amended; Section IV Economic Development, p. 14 states: "IV E CONOMI C DEVELOPMENT Stimualte, encourage, and give preference to those types of economic activities and developments which provide opportunities for the employment of Meridian citizens and area residents and reduce the need for persons to commute to neighboring cities." 21. That the land proposed to be annexed can be reasonably assumed to be used for the orderly development of the City as development of some kind will occur, and such will affect and become part of the City. 22. That the Ordinances of the City require that land be zoned upon annexation; that all the land has been requested to be zoned "D" Industrial; that the City has authority under its police powers to zone property in its discretion for the best interests of the City. Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council approval is requested, and if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. SincerelV", Ld, Alvin S. Marsden (in behalf of the following property owners) Carol Mayer Marshall Ronald W. Van Auker John and Joe Dobaran Charles Sallas J. R. Spencer 0 APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVAL Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Applications must be presented at City Hall by the Second Monday of the Month for Planning & Zoning Filing Information I. GENERAL INFORMATION N.A. (Proposed Name of Subdivision) North of Union Pacific Railroad and East of Eagle Road (General Location) See attachment #2 (Owner(s of Record) (Name) (Telephone No. (Address) See attachment #1 (Applicant) (Name) Telephone NA. (Address) Marsden & Associates 344-4343 (Engineer, Surveyor or Planner) (Name) (Telephone NQ,) 410 S. Orchard, #136. Boise, Idaho 83705 (Address) City of Meridian (Jurisdiction(s) Requiring Approval) N.A. (Type of Subdivision -Residential, Commerical, Industrial) (Accepted by:) (Fee) + 184 Acres of Land in Contiguous Ownership MM PARCEL #I September 30, 1982 Mrs. Annette Hinrichs, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Meridian Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Chairman: As property owners we wish to request annexation of our property as described in the attached legal description, to the City of Meridian. The zoning requested is industrial. It is requested that the property be included'in Meridian's Urban Service Planning Area and be zoned as industrial. Sincerely, Attachment 1 a •. s Carol Mayer -Marshall 225 10th Avenue San Francisco, CA 94118 ■ PARCEL #2 September 13, 1982 Mrs. Annette Hinrichs, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Meridian Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Chairman: It is requested that our parcel located adjacent to the City of Meridian be annexed. The property is described in the attached legal description. Your favorable review of this request is appreciated. Sincerely, "Do s, ,d ee i #A 0 2 Fcr Vaho Real" .100 11Tix-La :R and NMI ZRITI.EID$R, huxiond { and wife, ! aril and wa�v" tato Jog w, uw stasatora do • ��► 0 . ! single man, j*W � and AI.VELLA DD&WN, , husband sad wife, d in............Ads.......Camy I t+a, to Witt the Santee s, the toWor� x � P All that portion of the S� of Section 9, Township 3 North, Ranke 1 East of the Boise Meridian, lying North of the r1j;ht'- of-way and station grounds of the Oregon Shurtline Railroad Company, in Ada County, State of Idaho. EXCEPTING THEREFROM: That portion -of the SWt of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more I particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner couanon, to Sections 81 9, lb North 1298.53 feet along and 17 of T. 3N., R. JE., B.M.; thence the section line common to Sections 8'and 9; thence S. 89°56'24" E., 25 feet to a 518" iron pin on the North right-of-weq line of the union pacific Railroad, rhe REAL ?OINT OF BEGINiNING•, thence North 892.76 feet; thence S. 86°4148" E., 12.1,4 feet; thence N. 1°21'18" E., 43.53 feet to the South right-of-way line of the Settlers Canal; thence along the South right-of- way line of the Settlers Capal N. 82°5111.2" E`., 54.03 feet; thence S. 87`5','lb" E., 435.75 feet; thence N. 44°07'18" E., 1 .31 feet; thence N. 88°21'12"'E., 220.15 feet; thence S. 88° 26118" L., 801.F,4 feet; thence S. 7'%°29' 18" E., 181,1.3 Leet; thence S. 66°38'18" E., 511.24 feet; thence N. 89020'42" E., 478.57 feet to the last point lying; on the South right-of-way line of the Settlers Canal; thence S. 0°40'30" E., 692.32 feet alorg a line 20' West of and par:,ilel to the center section line of Sec. 9, to a point on the North right-of-way line of the I'nion Pacific Railruad; th.siti .. 89°56'24" W., 2664.44 e North right -of -,y line of the union Pacific feet alun;; tile a•: Railroad to the real point of i)eginning, containing 52.35 acres.. 'l.),t,ether with all water, water ri,;htti, ditches and ditch rights, irri,,.atioll well~ :ind pump~ and the ri►;hts to the use of the same aliuircen.� thereto (rust -6 ill coirncctiun therewith. 0 a'is x t r 3 `Y s� r u� c. , c a, :,, ''A5 '.:�w-• > m ' ` " Yx»". t ,f' ✓. �� .-�� s` 3• F 7^,r "�` �'3:v� ,i ,r t K?''`� �K LP � y •p�t € S rs<` a � `�.kw � � �`' ti �, r§ a f "i` ��. � r � 7• �, r EC I i c y TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premi&W with their appart+ensam unto the said Grantee 16 the i r heirs sad sedges towww. And the Meld Grantor a do hereby eareaant to aid w itti the said Grantee S. that t he y are the owner a is feesimple of said preinism: that tit we frac from all encumbrances i a� and that t hey will w.Arrant and Mend "M same frost aq lawttd dmhm wbatsomr. 4 r Dated: 1967. yfiY x ,sY F17,N STATE OF IDAHO. CQiTA1T9t OF DA' STATIC OP IDAHO. COUNTY OF on ttu,' s i� ear of 4 . w b 7 , 1 baebr MAO Inst ibis watnuout nm A1M far record at before me. a pubik is sad forthe MquM of qjl 111u QL Q appearedat © ii mute pMt K JOHN M1TTLZIDER and RUBYtti� day of MITTLELPgR, husband and wife, u%%.toor&Ama4datyrem"aIF** 1 �• of 1tNds at pp g 4 bft'"n W me is;be the perrons --bo" �e s are fl HN 13ASTIDA a r *Awr*d to the wilAis 1Wrnmea1. and aebootvledted to Lftt•Oioto tleasrdry ` they. eaea+tud the wne•� Jac.--- u---- y r � t✓�'_. a ��,,. • Com' § � - Now" POW Pan i a" to; � iN t? A'�"/7I.. f �I,d � e:. +� .. M �'1��1 �- 1 ���w�.�L" JY ^e-��T/ ^��'�'�'I�r1'P►..� � R� • A'r �r - �;"�.: 60 4A- 141rkig� 3 0 I IF •� PARCEL #3 0 1 . r t.A111111�t}i e•wW .t AHK i"�i ile IM" t h ltd a � NMfin cook �� f iii nit " --"i q1�tn �.,,�{ 1t�a ppftQfj,,..+rsyba>i ••5f®F ,+s:wbYra.n�.'rt• a»Iw.IR.fNMM•R�kYsriw. �' r �+ 2 lawfill . t f of thedlaitcd til+ttavt of /t le �,� p�,itfby zr of the Itwrottd pat°;. the receipt whert-p•ht bo* a4a�ettllt d, bf►+te1�., q wildbytyle ptttsmnter do 8►7tat, t+n 11e1T'ttP a lllivgr lratal tll�! P � d hcile l l t tut, ftsrevW, all of tw- ar palm•j of lattl� Ohm,'". t�rlroi�s aan# 1 � Q r d « atld its �l til , WtltlWte>f'ti of swim". ' Dee Blllhtbtt "A" fit d Me& a plik hMWby mUroot". At .; $ I*? 9f radR>'d, esslttasNe Of reap>rd hied 6�1R mea tinct• tlr =,�_ �_ � • 1811. WOMMM"s vt any) for the Y. c � • Gantt..-c'a Addrelisel 91S "emote Drive, Boise, Idaho arKrther a st'. J singular the lertementt6 hereditaments and ullptui.elutnces thereunto belonging err in anv- �' /v' • 111 4 �' slid the ret ervton land revetnioas remainder and remainders . :eMIA 1143. tie, right, (stir. urieredt � , rentx, is,uta+and prolitrt the' :t do r. prvlr•,•rty,psJltti miol4, taoever, a. well to law aA in equity, of the uaid part }ea of the first part, of, in or to the e ►rd prenu.ess, _,I v part and parcel thereof, with theappurtenancea. ,. Tv ilAt►. Ar,u 1 All ;utd lingular the said premiseii. together with the appurtenances. unto the said pert Y ,/f the,+-tund part al.d to Its heirs; and am%ignrs forever. 1%wlt,0a %' le►kM* nr..ttd Ori and ,.c,, 1' 1,38 rri the firm part hu+atirg hereunto net theta' hands le ilia• day aril yea lir,.l eh4»'e written �ie•.tb :A/�:U Aalr 1)KIHI 111\ ('Ni:V,p. t Or BARAN �rmc.�a�iSeult • N - — — — s`ieall KIATEOF111),Ult), i I ( #• my 4J Ada j On th:r ej of Januarys its the yrar IJ 82 . wforp me P -V Ac" I t F. Nntary Public m and (or WMA RAN. 1, n, .,en'1 J011h, F RAN. ARVELLA L, WHARAN 4 •..,,. j': ° . :.,. r., 1. s I>. M•r w.n w and JOE I)AHARAN "'"r" • g are auhu•rdred to the within instrument, and y L : rr, ule•d thr •:uno u •R 'A— arnr I I,.e.e• Le n uulo •rl nit Iwnd .slid ails %. tl nt -aJ .sal, lhouT 4L;y and year ut this. je Nr P u t 1'1111114' Ip u• Stair u( Ie1.e11„ .. . f, I '. ­'­ r , , P, i, d 1„1 CHICAGO TITLE W. ,f 1.1 n„ nlhm, dnJ 1h111 ,e•e e,hlrel ut IR,,,s, �” ,d JOHN BASTIDA _._._.�... e. ..ear.• q ,. IA. � ' y3 ' � ti �`S€� ,�h r � kis + •� • ' �. -�7R '�u` `�� y�'rlp �tk 8 •�•'<5 ,>':, - r+ , r ,, 40 -9I'S9 �r •� � �p� a t�� � �. ��` � �y���15��"{! J� -1 f 1 1 S i. , "`�.. ,,� ``?krt r -, ?�'�k. C "�°`` i't`s ``��' �'t'�{tt� �- P� t A �ia}A � � 1 f�#� i� ■� r g '� Dy '!p 9 � T� Y ✓L.? k 4`d � S 1Y l� ,}k _ qq, �^1� w 'lrsi+w 4 71, South PoP AOI to any. Oft 30. loss PAR L 1#4 r UCLObUr 12, 1982 Mrs. Annette Hinrichs, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Meridian Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Mrs. Hinrichs: As property owners we wish to request annexation of our property as described in the attached legal description, to the City of Meridian. The zoning requested is industrial. It is requested that the property be included in Meridian's Urban Service Planning Area and be zoned as industrial. Attachment T, k`n is • '� WARRANTY DEED Inc' e For Vtslow R.0dved COOK Investments Services Company e 1 an Idaho Corporation the psntor . does hereby grant, bargain, !reb ind convey unto S�J`'ol— CISCO/Van Auker 3fps- /'�,ct�'..4• C�'°i�'�a, 7`o ab• the grantee . the foWwi:►g described premises to -wit: See Exht.C.t A attached hI1 TO Hf1L11 ;hr id to mi rn, rich thou t.;a•ultenance, unto the said Grantee To HAVE AN grantor do-!' herNby covenant to and heirs :end a>>>1m, I .rcc, tthAtud Ih' ,aid that said its 1 t ,,,., In f, a simple of said t,remiaea, ,that hot ,e['✓atlUt113 r,° [-t•Ct)rd, with the said Grantee ,,xt..-pt fur t• j ptemi,rs:,IefreeCrumatiincumhratlEntt'I taxi.!, ,nd 1rrioaa j,,n assessments it easements ut record and y I ar tent. it any) fur the ye and that xbut w11: t -errant c,nd tiefend the same al; L.wfu; cl�imswhatsoever. C'.JMPANY,INC. Doted: c.ut.K [NV LSPMt.t:'1'!` SNV10ES 70 Wl ( 0 A,• f STATE OF RMH t. la, f Or. th •+ x ,. A {.,r b.f•ne ire. l l ' •pp.st f',�� e I, It 1-iTf „t I, AHO, COt:`dTY OF that t!..a Instrument %*as Aled :or record at r.., •ent ,( CHICAGO iil Li (:U jdela tt /^ r' ysst ? i. dist of .%.r- �''f ani ec, reed In book --- ? ! U.vis .' 1•®ee JOHN BASTIUA smisIT A laoie-holf Of parcel of land in the Dute I Baste Meridian Township 3 North, Rang h Section 91, re particularly deparili" as Ada County, Idaho" so mg at an icon rod marking the one-quarter Comencii tiling 9 and 10, c moon to Se Soise Heridlanj thence corner North, Range I Baste to an iVOft '"d "1080910 West 25.00 feet South 69 Of a county roads on the West right-of-WaY line thence along said right-ot-wey thence South 1".03'34'East 60- 00 Feet. the 64111je West Further South 10030340 East along 24 62-'fe*t road an additional 13 jway line of a county _ot_woy line of the U*iliftlp�-- right-O to a point on the North right to the True Point of Beginnings thence Railroad. -- the -Of-wAy line of, We at)along e the .00 fliet to a north Ci9htpoints thence South 99056124" Union Pacific i6ad 660arallel to the West north 1"03'34" past along a line Proad heretofore f -way line Of a county right -O feet to a Points thence 660-00 arallel to the Nortil South 89*s6'24* Cast along & line pific right-of-way Of the Union Fac cethen&ilcoad 660-00 feet to a point Of & county road$ p westerly right-Ot-way ,*030340 South 610119,iame viestet 8 South to the True POInt of Beginnin9f d par . cc� . 660-01) feet 00 acres, containing approximately 10 PAROL #5 Y) C A parcel of land in the South one-half of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an iron rod marking the one-quarter corner common to Sections 9 and 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence South 89010'09" West 25.00 feet to an iron rod on the West right-of-way line of a county road; thence along said right-of-way South 1003'34" East 60.00 Feet, thence Further South 1°03134" East along the same West right-of-way line of a county road an additional 1324.62 feet to a point on the North right-of-way line of the Union Pacific Railroad to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 8905624" West 2334.48 feet, more or less along the north boundary of Union Pacific Railway; thence South 0°03'36" West 50.00 feet; thence North 89°56'24" West 359.48 feet more or less to a point on the midsection line; thence South 200 feet along the midsection line to the south boundary line of Union Pacific Railroad; thence South 89°5624" East 2693.96 feet along said south boundary to the west right-of-way line of Cloverdale Road; thence North 1°03134" West 250.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING September 28, 1982 0 Mrs. Annette Hinrichs, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Meridian Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Chairman: It is requested that my parcel located adjacent 'to I,the City of Meridian be annexed. The property is described in the attached legal description. Your favorable review of this request is appreciated. Sincerely, Jam. PAgCEL # 7 M- .44 ; x� R SU TMApUN TNAIWi RIMS REF9RM6,1$:rMW ,5 { r 1 ' 3 mss% 8 Z�. TQ UVE AND To HOLD the said pmnie . with their alb unto the add Crag Usha and nuigns forever. And the said Granter' s too herift, >t�atrmtant to and frith d w aatid Gramm. chat the Y are the owners in fcv simple of said prmltles; that p" M" pranim ane b" him all eneumbranceit said tits; t he Y wili warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever. Dated, (>etauber 26, 19W z Clarence Colljngh 9 er �_____.--------- --- Doris M. Collingham 1 y� BTAT9 ur Il►A1110 t1UNTYuY Ada MATE of IDAHO. 4 AWN'ry u ' � � 1 - C. 1 hereby cerltly that thin instrYQleltt was filed for record 4; +� � �tl t the nut of tbjs, 4aPIONEER 111LE C ° ItBW pas, r wolkty poWlt in mW for maid State. pettiltnally l at U" minus past .'clockA, Y -C Iareeita Coll 11n9haa1 atbthis, -c- — day of �reu�t M: Col I i nghm n, , �, In m� Inni.•e, and duly recorded In nook f •.♦ ► �' it. .d,:,I p,yte La> ih.I»f,rfi s who s@Ilamr s are JOHN BASTI®A rApeMOW W the aatblA IRmernmcnt, rtul arklwwlr111t1.1 to Ex 4 Wit k c ler s�j, • `they ted eajruthe ml.1n. ! - -ii •. 1 O --.am•• - -il / � 1. � ./l / � �t ��' � It1. � �� i [- � ..a is - /Nola rr f�sllr i � Ihlwt}. � Nse.910g a1 BO k@ I,l•,I,,, t,. n; ,? >• - - • r;,mm I;myltr. ✓/ / /)6., Mull l„ A_�tr• •'l�i�ia�r•L �}l.�,T (� rloNO gAOAtl OUNTY Nr 1110 w CJmltetto- III 150160 Idaho SPQR 200 Jaa 6915 1 sePtearo pasnew NNwael title Nleutatice (irfGP4f71^rKr05°'1f'lf51"(f11�li°Ii11, i;, V, .11 1;f',i11, i1% i', zV t"o A, y now,*# r 3 now*, am** saw- "Woo them" So lotch As sbe MOW pion As ow row 1I of booksoul. th"Wo" *-war past a *0 pok*. %am* rout is m om omth ORWAW 49 914" of fmW lam" tham" soma ~110 woo -0- , owss#lIM9s 6a NOW spue "Imp" 41,-, =0— soc* a swap qf iiool'*W.NI elm mail* as Now 'We" slow"- WS4,434" oft 0 1#/1!.3 1*0 to at. It OAMISMO 4e, IS 98A tO ths 9"1 VOL" of ""OSM"s ago" ~&I* am* to 4 vou*1 "one* ftom so*WS#V #"a PW*IW to go Sava sect&M "Be U6 go" to & Volmo ftm� ssoM 40260W &MO 19 90" to 0 NOAMS lb"M yoffo *qvW,*W Son M go" to MW Sea VpAsW of bogkW44*- T% and Witl " pro and that Dated: STATE I ,ip at ed as t )Clic to hip t ced as h d; PARCEL X67 r r PARCEL #8 (" !Ir!&ddui #iA a%! Grl ��! �! l&! 11i! lilt. ��. lu! i; 'u° !+i + S + t a• •' 'ul aul AU 1u' 4.1 '411461 W-' u! U AA AV 4w la.' r'44 fu V !i'. 4: w,' >U •V AW ' WARRANTY DEED g t FOR VALUE RECEIVED .Jul:°I J. PULB and ARI.F*.'F: RL'I:B, husLand .ind .; : ft, e and PAUL K. GIPDNER and KAY GIRr,XR, husband and wife �# on datu of acquiring titla: and continously since rg the Grantors , do hereby Krar.t, barg:.iu, rW II aad L•,nct_. wa: , JAMES R. 110LI,IS'ri:i :,':li KARC14 L. 11ULLISTER, husband a:..: w. it, i.� thets'n4mms ,%h•rseaddressix 9340 ilai,Ie Bill Itrivc, IUOiSe, Ic:aho the following described premiNe,, U, -W it. :S 1 ricor:jord Leu; herr, l:, .tti ..- L f(,l'Lh ? if full. °a ,J 3 TU HAVE AND TO IIuI.I1 the ,,:id I.renuw•s, with their al:in,rtt n:uut•s unm the said tir:uttee the i r heirs and :t,:a1Kn, fore%er. And the ,+ud +;r.utor do herrhp vw4- ov to and with the suid t:rantrtti , that tlu•y are tht• ottnt•rs in fee simple,if Haid premises; butt said premises are freer from all enruml,rances except tnosu Hatters of record and t i t t, • . �J .J and that t hey will warrant :and deti•ht) the same from :ill 1:, ful clams, .t h:a,oecer. 'J Uatal: octk tbvr rU 1930. :r John J. RueL 1'., ,1 G: rJzjt •r 4 y Arlene Rueb STATE of IDAHO. I tIFN 'II 1 1 iaDA :IAiL „F 11, W, r. 1 411'NI1' 44'_ >•�.'1 / r 1 r,. r. i.t , . rvfy tt..t, th„ rnstrunwnt as G1tA for rtrurd in, this /� d.ry ..f <Ictobt i i3llX,tw r..iu,•,t..f GUiil14l3Y4liiLltl ihiiU iu;L :S hc4or® me, a ►w.rary public m and G., .a„t , , r "n.,Uy � , `� , ' appeared ., m.nu.• pant , .•Hoak• M. :,t. t F,. , I' n.::,t ..P . ..,r.1 du:p rt unh 1 it. Ht k • Mn•,wn ,a m" to I., thr Is n,.n S .. . • I r- • JOHN BASTIn/>l r� sul,arrd,eJ ,,, Iht a,•h:n Irtor,.n,. ,, , .n,t . r. „4-1 F:�-t,fhcw U,r.,rder rte that t91i•/ •s•..... r. .w -•, PIUNEfp TITLE COMPANY OF ADA COUNTY " Virpreaent:ng P,unee, Nal.onol 1.110 wsirente r ! tt•<y vi •:•[ _..,.....'BC:Wt€a5x?It$a�'i3n'If.t'su>• aid.: 0 C STATE OF 1DA11O) ) ss. County of Ada ) nn this IC-�_day of October, 1980, before me, tLe mi-1--isigoed a %otdry Public in and for said State, personally appc.red 01ARLES V. MUONEY. knuwn to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and fureroing instrument as the attorney in fact of JOHN J. RUEB and ARLENE R -'F8. and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the names of J0114 J. RUB and ARLENE 'PES- thereto as principals, and his own name as attorney in fact. r {,f1 WI-TNESS WUR, r, I have hereunto sct my icand and affixed my btficial * eAlt9ke'lsy. month and year first above writt••n. • �"• l0 . • � 110, utary Public tor fd:chn ,> Residirg at Boise. Idaho z PARCEL I: Part of the SEDC of Section 9, Township 3 North. Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian. Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15 and 16, Township 3 North. Range 1 East, of the Boise Meridian; thence North 0006'45" West. 25 feet; thence North 89035'14" West. 25 feet to a point, which point is 25 feet West of the existing centerline of Cloverdale Road as now constructed and 25 feet North of the existing centerline of Franklin Road as now constructed; thence continuing North 89'35'14" West along a line 744.80 feet r) the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 0.20'17" East. 1002.27 feet to apoint; thence North 88'47'47" West a distance of 433.54 feet to a point; thence South 0.20'17" West. 1008.26 feet to a point, which point is 25 feet North of the existing centerline of FRanklin Road as now constructe thence South 89035'14" East. 433.5 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following described parcel of land; A Strip of land for public right-of-way located in the Southeast quarter of Section 9. Townshipp 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, and more parts:ularly described as follows: Beginning at the corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15, and 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence North 0°06'45" West 25 feet; thence North 89135'14" West 25 feet to a point, which point is 25 feet west of the existing center lime of Cloverdale Road as now constructer! and 25 feet North of the exiling center line of Franklin Road as now constructed; thence continuing North 89°35'14" gest along a line 744.80 feet to the REAL POINT OI' BEGINNING: thence North 0°20'1;" East 15 feet to a point; thence North 88°47'47" West a distance of 433.5 feet to a point; thence South 9'20'11" West 15 feet to a point, which point is 25 feet North of the existing; center line of Franklin Ruad as now constructed; thence South 39°35'14" East 433.5 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. 0 0 WARRANTY DEED } or 6'alue ltmsuved , ... t hr ; r .ntur du.' hereby grant, bargain, Sell and e'vnvey unto r the grantee the following described prefniass, to -wit: County Idaho, -to wit: �.r•j.:Lit�ihttv.•i'.�'.. :.. ..P�. , ._. r•__ ,, ..... –. -Pi►.'i;., ti r:i, VC•., V(: 1e::! .: .:1'.. f: fl-`. •.14J ^-FAt�f . _... D�' ! _ . , ... ... _ ,.., •rJ �.. .. ... :.. r', t'•. _ . a.l 1j feet ...rti: of the cc.nstructed• �:a� tl� thence continuing wt:ztF:. k AL P71ii OF to t:, thence north 0°20'17" east :; .•.e: t� r.._:-; thence north 8d047'47" Vest a '.Sittin_'9 of .,'', q•..:,, .. h y�iIIL; thence south 9020'17" west 15 feet to a _ :n., .hien F;int 25 feet note of the existing _enter 'life of Franaii% - its now . ,...r'i_te3; thence so_th 89035'." etss: 4.1•i Feer to TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantee , L- heirs and assigns forever. And the said t;rantor do hereby envenant to and +r'r the said Grantee that she is the owner in f simple of said premises; that said ps :f ilei are tree from all incumbrances !cat : be will warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever. 1'.!e': /s—r e�0 aJ 7 } s-1,NTF. r, -F IDAHO, CW;NTY OF it)IkHO, COUNTY 017,—Z -�A� day of A,1/ 19 FTA.TEOF by c•ruty that this nstnrment wag Atari tmr r*trnrdat notary pab►rt rn and for saW State, persona i<est "feL18 ro.r!y h ..,.� .. .. a e. a i • .' / • I va .:. ;n -I! a®,Ce. a"d du'.fi-ve-,Pdod 7•a Book • ..- _..n,.. h as 14go r lows tl)'-1 . IF � pasaot► who .29 name s..W""d to `nftk lrlst l'YetlQnl, and aeinowladRM to �ptrc � ,�y r ENCS L �F.�rtNTT NG I • 'ha�� 'd°•,�;y+/ eaecutad the agree r,,.tiAtno Aesordtao• ` Notary PoMta y R at Idaho �/ Fees I/ 1 spinae ���`��% Mad to - PARCEL ASSOCIA TE® PAC/F/C STOVERS 60 E. Clearcreek Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 88&I8®® If no awns. 888-5755 October 10, 19-02 Mrs. Annette Hinrichs, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Mer id ian Merid ian, Idaho 83642 Dear Chairman: It is requested that our parcel locUted adjacent to the City of Meridian be annexed. The property is described in the attached legal description. Your Favorable review of this request is appreciated. Sincerely, JOHN R. SPENCER, JR. and SHIRLEY A. SPE110ER NORMAN E. WAUGH,JR. and PATRICIA A. WAUGH 4ti bft Q I By Shirley A. Spencer PARCEL #9 t WA•RRANW DEED l For Vauer Ret-elved Cl IlAhVIN:, Incl '•1.41tY F, it :; t httr:btna an r ' z-ia tltr t•r ta;t.taf 5+ dos iflu. grant, rJTain, sell and ctrnve !• ti ' P,r„tent! ;,rtJ w i fie, and X0jL%�11 !i, I�AIJiyli ,lp i unto Jif?: R. .,.Pl , } k, JP • ars i f 'h« ec,,r:1�® , tdhose ettrs®nE addrea9lp .. and PATRICIA A. WAjj(;}}t t � 502S N. Cole f4d. Rti ” ' p } ize and Rtari:et Bar poa? •:. , I the Jt,110WjAg dwrlw AJ elgea, is Ad. CiwOUPAp Idabe, The real property descr .ed in Ex411bit ,�1►�r .,", stanched horeco and pada hart hereaf. ,J a a z 3.r tai,:: �.�k Sir y,^ t,•� 4 , ut��: � 4 ' d est t7 8AY$ A Hfl1.D "b* G&WprOMIses. with their uppurbw"Ces unto the b* -� sad asslbns 10MU. And the said Gran tox s dotltuttt� � 4,r tWuh the latald Grote- r , tw t 1•.0 y ar+ owner s in fee simple of now premises tWebyp t �► �� ��} N Y except tsxes For 19-4. rte' 2" &b&t t Italy w& wsr'rant attd defenA the same from all lawful elatms WhatmWer. � * 9: Ajs [><s !,f. . 1974. $r JDAIJO. CUCaiTY OF Ad , �• °l i,�f day ' of <' -2 ,d; STATE OF IDAHO, COUNTY OF x . 19 .j I hereby certify that thfa JnstmWeat was } fq record at fv'tnry PUM-c to end tar thn acid Ftatz, par- thr rt quest of +7 x3 nrrd r %alr 113uhjt,v and Mar%- -y # C: 6t \ `' inutsa peat Wdotk Lt., +dna z i this \g of J s xorJed in 134o's f Ftz r:f Le"L., at Pate Wk9Fv nwne9 ary A Q 3, .• a j 4+9 Jap Wj*),n Oretr+anent, std a Jnatirledged t9 f i3r!a-C . io tiraot6tgrci 04 $61.1e Mahn t R P- • Description: Part of the SE4 of Section 9, T. .t N., P. 1 E„ m.'�., ;4ea Idaho, more particularly described as follows: °eginniag .t tiler corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15 and 16, T, 3 thence - North 0006'45" East, 25 feet to a point, thence North 89° 35' 14" West, 25 feet to a point, which pm:rrt is 25 fear west of the existing center line of Cloverdale Pcaei as ; tow COnstr3.',ed and 25 feet North of the centerline of Franklin cedas now constructed, the Rt4l Point of Seqinning, thsnce North 89035114" West along a line 744.86 feet to a pvi:tt, thence North 0020117" East, 410.46 feet to s pojnt, thence is: an Easterly 743.20 feet to a points thence South 0°06'450 West 410.46 feet to the Real point cf Seginn4ng. EXCEPTt Part of the SE4 of Section 9, T. 3 North, Mange 1 East, foiSe Meridian, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the corner corm to Sections 9, 10, 15 and 16, T. 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian.; thence North 0006'45" East 25 feet to a point; thence North 89035'14" West 25 feet to a point, whir_h Point is 25 feet West of the existing center line of Cloverda a Road as now constructed and 25 feet North of the center lin* of Franklin Road as now constructed, the Real Point of Bea:nninq; t-enee North 89035'14" West along a line 412.00 _feet to"a saint: tkprce North 0006127" East 410.46 fee: to a point; thence South 89038'43" East 412.10 feet to apnir.t: thence South 0°06'45" West 410.46 feet to the Rea1 Point t` Peci:.a'irq. ALSO EXCEPT: A strip of land for public right-of-way located in le southeast quarter of Section 9, T. ! N, R. 1 E. >3. �:. , more spec$ `$Cally described to -wit; Beginning at the corner common to Sections 9, la, 15 arc: .6, 3 N., R. 1 F.., B.M.,t thence North n*06'45" East 25 feet to a point; t"er.ce ::,,rth 89935114" West 25 feet to a point; o:;,ich coi :_ is 25 feet West of the East section line of said Section. 9 25 feet ":,rth of the South line of Section 9; ther.ce rth 39035'14" V-'ess, along a line 412 ft...P• to t:.•• =�,1 Pc•nt of Leninrinq; thenct• + ontinuing rth 65035'14" West ;110ng a lin,, 341.' fe>t !o a t�:r.�; !!;encs ,.rth 00201171, F'.�st 15 fe t L , -h :?9°3 .'14' E'.,st 3`► t; t :erre 41. rtt?t t,, ,� �^it:!• '1a^moi: 1� ite•4 tai tF.t :',:•.r' `'-:rpt r� r. .-^.i'., �'i �: 3 ..t...• tri. 0 :i..":i.3 PARCEL 1'10 1 7777777 a /—S- ti yi `f WARRANTY KED t:.uLX'Il'RL. Made this -1st day of August . 1968, between 1'.t.i:.:; and `L�RY l: HAWhINS, -usband and wife, of Boise, Ada County, i idaho, the parties of the first part, and: IDAHO POWER COMPANY, a r! +rati,m, the party of the second part. WITNESSETH, That the said parties of theifirst part, for and in con- sideration of the sum of ONE HUNDRED AND NU/HUNDREDTHS DOLLARS ($100-0())' law- ful money of the United States of America and other good and; valuable considera- tion, to them in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained and sold. andbythese presents do grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the said party of the second part, and to its successors and assigns forever, all the following described real estate, situated in Ada County, State of Idaho, to -wit; Part of the Southeast Quarter (SFhc) of Section Nine (9). Township Three (3) North, Range One (1) East, Boise Meridian, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the corner common to Sections Nine (9). Ten (10), Fifteen (15) and Sixteen (16). Township Three (3) North, Range ,+n, (I) East . :,,+ice >t. ridl:u,; thence North lt•ro Degrees Six >:inun:; Forty -i iv,t...,nds L.tst (:: U rlb'4`;'' L), twenty-five (25) !e,•t to a point; thence ''orth I:igh t•-nihe Jrgrces 'Thirty -hive uLu> I'.nrrL,•••11 5.•r,+ods :iet:t 11 x9'35'1"" Wl, twenty-five; (25) icet to .r 'r+,+int, +:hich poitt,t, is twenty-tive (25) feet Vest of the existing .enter line of" Lloverdale Road as now constructed and twenty-five'(25) feet %,orth of the center line of Franklin Load as now constructed, the Real Point of Beginning; thence North Eighty-nine Degrees 1;hirty-five Minutes Fourteen $'oronas West (N 89°35'14" W) along a line, four hundred twelve (412.00) feet to a point; thence North Zero Degrees Six Minutes Twenty- seven Seconds East (N 0°06'27" E) four hundred tea and forty-six hundredths (410.46) feet to a point; thence South Eighty-nine Degrees Thirty-eight Minutes Forty-three Seconds East (S 89°38'43" E) four hundred twelve and ten hundredths (412.10) feet to a point; thence South Zero Degrees Six Minutes Forty- five Seconds West (S 0°06'45" W) four hundred ten and forty- six hundredths (410.46) feet to the Real Point of HOgiuning, with all improvements thereon and together with all water and water rights. ditch and ditch rights thereunto belonging or r .tnd eigkLV-right hundredths rt••., ,..or. or io,n. . it!l .,11 .urd �iu,•,u;ar the LCUL-111Clits, hereditaments and thoreunt • beioncing or in ut}•wise appertaining, the reversion and „ :,•r5i„n�, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and protits thereof, and all right, title and interest in and to said property, as well in law as in ,•juin', of the said parties of the first part. 0 0 -2- 1'0 HAVE. AND TO HOLD, All and singular the above mentioned and described premises, together with the appurtenances, unto the party of the ccessors and assl � s forever and the said parties se,:und part, and to its su' of the first part, and their heirs, the said premises in 'the quick and peaceable its successors end 'aae Ss.► possession of the said party of the second part, t all against the said parties. of the first and agai� part, and their heirs. the and every person and persons whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to clailm shall and will WARRANT and by these presents forever DEFEND. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. The said parties of the first part have hareumt0 set their hands and seals the day and year first above written„ srATE OF ) Drew % SS County of Ada ) R D Smith On this 1st day of August , 1968, before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared CLAIR S HAWKINS and MARY E HAWKINS, known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the Sam • IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I haus hereunto set my head and alfixad Sy official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. 1 aaau►►nnrrrr, // � ? •.-tom • ry ;'tip,.• r Notary Public for the Slate of Idaho Residing at. �}}'e My CommisFlon expires:• (10TARIAL SEAL) c 12 ` _� x .-moi 1:3 Cd CI br J 0 CORPORATE WAPRANTY DLED THIS INDENTURE, Made this 21' day of 1974, between IDAHO POWER COMPANY, a Maine corporation, duly qualified and doing business in the State of Idaho, ?arty of the first part, and ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, a highway district 6.1y organized and existing under the laws of the State rif Idi-bo, caving its principal place of business at 401 Bioadway Ave.iue, Boise, Ada County, Idaho, party of the second part, WI5';iFSSFTtD: That the said party of the first part, for anri in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/HU":DREn1S DnLLAF (T]t1.Uf1), and other good and valuable consideration, to it in hand Agin hY the said party of the second part, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold, and by these p,,esentr-; does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the --;.:;i 1,�:rty of the second part, and its successors and assignE forc••rer, r>s�3.ject to the reservations hereirafter provided, the following f,�•L.r1 ;];rod real estate situated •n Ada County, State G' Idaho. A strip of land for public right-•of-wuf=oca-+- in tis' southeast quarter of Sect -in 9, ''ownr`.ir, 3 1 East, Boase -Meridian, more P"--. rularlr d• s a follows: Beginning at the corner co::-.r,n t�) Sec -ti -,ns `J, :'�, 1'. and 16, 'r unship -i North, thence north 316'4i" ei _ t: to a •s,i `�.cr, north fig° 15' 14 ' weE t ,nL, 't,1nL is 21j feet w =t: of the'c X -.t�•r i ; c .�:el Road as now conntructe•: ` .� ' r..: t:. o: center line of Frank!tn Road a- In JW c uct"-d' QF BMirjNrN:,: thence nT,r.. 14" .:es! a1^::g 8 line. 412.00 feet to a n- rth 00s-` 27" �- , _ 15 feel to a point; thence soy=h '}" :4" east 404 'e=t to a point; thence north thence south 890?8'43" east -- r.►ore '.r _`- to "d point on the west right -of- -'. loves -'.• _ '; " rf'n` c t - '? 7.*- REGI .'Nif3G. t - 2 - RESERVING unto the Farty of the first part, its licenser!;, succes:.ors and assigns• a right of way and easement for the continued operation, maintenance, repair, alteration, inspection and replacem9nt of electric transmission, dis- tribution and telephone lines and circuits of the party of the first part, attached to polus or other supports, together with guys, crossarms and other -attachments anthy incidental equipment thereon, and app right to permit the attachment of wires and fixtures of other companies or persons, over, on and across the above; described premises until such time aP the aforementiono4 equipment and facilities are relocated at the request and sole cost and expense of the party of the second part, itG successors or assignsl and also expressly reserving unto the party of the first part the right to claim all exp£r►gfls incurred by the party of the first part, itb successor& Or assigns, in the relocation of said electric and telephone lines and circuits and other facilities as hereinabove described. • TOGETHER with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining# and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, iss'00b and profits thereof, and all of the estate, title, and interest in and to said property as well in law as in equity, of the said party of the first part, subject to the reservations hereinabove set fort)'. TO H7.VE AND TO HOLD, subject to the reservations herein -- above set forth, all and singular, the above mentioned and described premises, together with the appurtenances, unto the party of the Second part, and to its successors and assigns forever, and the said party of the first pa,,- and its succfss r:', the said premir.e:l: in the quiet and peaceable �ssessi.on of the: said party of the second part, it:, ::ur.C:essors and assigns, ag,lin.^.t the said party of the f i rst pert , .�n�l i is s t t-succe.sso'• , and 3yain.. all and every person and r�p�or.:: w::on Deus -r, l,awf''12y claiming or to claim the same, shall ,:n•3 w, I i w,irr,tnt :nd I.•, i hi 9r. rjresr nts forevl:r defend. MP a IN WITNESS WIiERUOF, the party of the fitsz part has ,1 caused its corporate name to be hereunto subscribes by its President and its corporate "eal to be affixed by its Secretary, the day and year first above written. IDAHD POWER CO- PW1 BY Vice -- S{ t$Crwt (CORPORATE SaL) G'i�E. ♦ a •"~•'••Secretary ST}1TE OF IDAHO ) ) Be County of Ada ) 1474, be°oro me, d On this 7y day of -ZatePersonally Mary y !Morton, a Notary Public in and for the sail arc .� apaeared ir,_; _. and _�' _ • they and, to me personally known. who being duly sworn. YeG';o are respectively the / .;" President and the the corporation that executed the within inst...-en =, ani ac%ft'_rw1ec9"r' to me that such corporation executed the same ac. =h= -ree art and` deed of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto s c -t -,s =,a:.d and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this ce_ificate first above written. SEATI Notary .Publ i' - Residing ut:• l My Corr:^=ss ion *"•xp' 0 4 DOBARAN ET AL ANNEXATION • PARCEL X11 A tract of land in the S 1/2 NE 1/4 of Section 9, T. 3N., R. 1E.0 B.M., Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an iron pipe marking the east one-quarter corner of Section 9, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. Thence North along the section line, 394.70 feet -to a point; Thence N. 89034'51" W., 2680.87 feet to a steel pin on the north -south mid section line of said Section 9; Thence S. 0°34'15" W., along said mid-section line, 394.69 feet to a brass cap marking the center of said Section 9; Thence S. 89°3451" E. along the east -west mid-section line, 2684.80 feet to the point of beginning. Said tract contains 24.31 acres more or less, subject to easements of record or in use, and subject to a road easement across the easterly 25 feet of the above-described tract which is presently occupied by Cloverdale Road and contains 9867 square feet (0.2265 acres) more or less. Together with all water and water rights, ditch and ditch rights appurtenant thereto. PARCEL #2 All that portion of the S 1/2 of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, lying North of the right-of-way and station grounds of the Oregon Shortline Railroad Company, in Ada County, State of Idaho. EXCEPTING THEREFROM: That portion.of the SW 1/4 of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 8, 9, 16, and 17 of T. 3N., R 1E., B.M.; thence North 1298.53 feet along the section line common to Sections 8 and 9; thence S. 89°56'24" East, 25 feet to a 5/8" iron pin on the North right-of-way line of the Union Pacific Railroad, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING: thence North 892.76 feet; thence South 86°41'48" East, 12.14 feet; thence North 1°12'18" East, 43.53 feet to the South right - of way line of the Settlers Canal; thence along the South right-of-way line of the Settlers Canal North 82°51'12" East, 54.03 feet; thence South 87°54'18" East, 435.75 feet; thence North 44°07'18" East, 12.31 feet; thence North 88°21'12" East, 220.15 feet; thence South 88°28'18" East, 801.84 feet; thence South 79°29'18" East, 181.13 feet; thence South 66°38'18" East, 511.24 feet; thence North 89°20'42" East, 478.57 feet to the last point lying on the South right-of-way line of the Settlers Canal; thence South 0°40'30" East, 692.32 feet along a line 20' West of and parallel to the center section line of Section 9, to a point on the North right-of-way line of the Union Pacific Railroad; thence North 89°56'24" West, 2664.44 feet along the North right-of-way line of the Union Pacific Railroad to the real point of beginning, containing 52.35 acres. Together with all water, water rights, ditches and ditch rights, irrigation wells and pumps and the rights to the use of the same appurtenant thereto or used in connection therewith. AW _ PARCEL #3 A parcel of land in the South one-half of Section 99 T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an iron rod marking the one-quarter corner common to Sections 9 and 10, T. 3N., R. 1E., B.M.; thence South 89°10'09" West 25.00 aeon tsa d Ce iron rod on the West right-of-way line of a county road; g right-of-way South 1003'34" East 60.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: thence South 89010109" West 986.50 feet to a point; thence South 1°03'34" East 130.00 feet to apo;nt; thence South 89010'091, point; feet to a 52 South point; thence South 1003'34" o 03 34 East 972.93 feet to a pt , 89°56'24" East 60.80 feet to a point; thence South 1°03134" East 200.00 feet to a point on the North right-of-way line of the Union Pacific Rail- road; thence along said right-of-waySouth 9of6a24" East nty r1,334.48 feet to an iron rod on the west right-of-way line leaving said railroad right-of-way and continuing along said county road right-of-way North 1°03'34" West 1,324.62 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; containing 40.575 acres, more or less. Subject to any -existing easements. PARCEL #4 A parcel of land in the South one-halfCounty, Section moreparticularly Township 3 rdescribed Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada y, Idaho as follows: Commencing at an iron rod marking the one-quarter corner common to Sections 9 and 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence South 89010'09" West 25.00 ft. to an iron rod on the West right-of-way line of a county road; thence along said right-of-way South 1"03'34" East 60.00 feet, thence Further South 1003134" East along the same estheiNorehf ightline of a county road an additional 1324.62 feet to a point on of the Union Pacific Railroad to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 89056124" West along the North right-of-way line of the Union Pacific Railroad 660.00 feet to a point; thence North 1°03'34" East along a line parallel to the West right-of-way line of a county road heretofore described 660.00 feet to a point; thence South 89°56124" East along a line parallel to the North right-of-way of the Union Pacific Railroad 660.00 feet to a point of a county road; thence South 1°03'34" South along same westerly right-of-way 660.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning, said parcel containing approximately 10.00 acres. PARCEL #5 A parcel of landinthe South one-half of Section 9, Township 3 North, P Idaho more particularly Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, described as follows: Commencing at an iron rod marking the one-quarter corner common to Sections 9 and 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence South 89°10'09" West 25.00 feet to an iron rod on the West right-of-way line of a county road; thence along said right-of-way South 1003'34" East 60.00 Feet, thence PARCEL #9 - Continued ALSO EXCEPT: A strip of land for public right-of-way located in the southeast quarter of Section 9, T. 3 N, R. 1 E. B.M., more specifically described to -wit: Beginning at the corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15 and 16, T. 3 N., R. 1 E., B.M.,; thence North 0°06'45" East 25 feet to a point; thence North 89°35'14" West 25 feet to a point; which point is 25 feet West of the East section line of said Section 9 and 25 feet North of the South line of Section 9; thence North 89035114" West along a line 412 feet to the Real Point of Beginning; thence continuing North 89035114" West along a line 341.5 feet to a point; thence North 0°20'17" East 15 feet to a point; thence South 89035'14" East 341.5 feet to a point; thence South 0°20'17" West 15 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. PARCEL 410 Part of the Southeast Quarter particularly of Section 9, Townshlows:North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, more Beginning at the corner common to Section 9, 10, 15 and 169 Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence North 0006145" East, 25 feet to a point; thence North 89035114" West, 25 feet to a point, which point is 25 feet West of the existing eanlineline FranklinCloverdale asnow Road as now cons constru ted,ucted and 25 feet North of the cent ence North 89°35'14" West along a line, the Real Point of Beginning; th 412 feet to a point; thence North 0°06'27" East 410.46 feet to a point; t; thence South 5" thence South 89°38'43" East 412.10 feet to a poinent s West 410.46 feet to the Real Point of Beginning, with all improvements thereon and together with all waterand water rights, ditch and ditch rights thereunto belongingor appertaining. This parcel of land contains 3.88 acres more or less. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT - Franklin Road and part of Cloverdale Road South of the Union Pacific Railroad A parcel of land in the South half of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, in Ada County, State of Idaho more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, thence North 89°35'14" West along the South line of Section 9, which is the center line of Franklin Road, a distance of 1,419.30 feet to a point; thence North 0020'17" East a distance of 40.00 feet, thence South 89°35'14" East 1386.3 feet more or less to a point 33 feet West of the centerline of Cloverdale Road, thence North 0°06'45" East 395.46 feet more or less along the west right-of-way line of Cloverdale Road, thence East 33 feet to a point on the centerline of Cloverdale Road, thence South 0006145" West 435.46 feet more or less to the point of beginning ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT - Cloverale Road North of the South boundary of Union Pacific Railroad A parcel of land in the South one-half of Section 9, T 3N., R. 1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an iron rod marking the one-quarter corner common to Sections 9 and 10, T. 3N., R. lE., B.M.; thence South 89°10'09" West 25.00 feet to an iron rod on the West right-of-way line of a county road; thence along said right-of-way South 1°03'34" East 1634.62 feet more or less thence North 89°10'09" East 25.00 feet to a point on the centerline of Cloverdale Road, thence North 1°03'34" West 1634.62 feet more or less to the point of beginning The foregoing descriptions were obtained from public records in Ada County and are subject to future boundary surveys. Metes and bounds descriptions have not been field checked.