Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-06-17~~ ~ ~~ - i ~ L~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ N ~-e ~~ . Ma orTamm de We Y y erd E IDIA City Council Members: ~i» Keith Bird ~ Joe Borton Charles Rountree David Zaremba NOTICE OF PUBLIC AWARENESS MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF AWARENESS IS HEREBY GIVEN that members of the Meridian City Council may attend a Meridian Neighborhood Town Hall Meeting on Monday, June 16, 2008 at 6:30 P.M. The Neighborhood Town Hall Meeting will be at the Meridian Fire Station No. 5 located at 6001 North Linder Road for an Open House, Agency Presentation and Question 81 Answer Period. This is not a meeting or workshop. The public is welcome to attend and for inquiries please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433. DATED this 13th day of June, 2008. JA ````````,``~~~111 ttl l l l1ll/I/IF/','''~I ;~' d~~ ~ ~ '--. ~o =_ BLAL :~ ~~ HOL~AI'~ -CITY CLERK', T'fa~ • ~~,~~~~ ,, C . ~ ~~, •~,, ,,. ,, ,,. .. j.,.•~ Notice of Awareness for Town Hall Meeting -June 16, 2008 Page 1 of 1 Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the Town Hall Meeting. r ~ i a I ~i.: ~ ~.~ ~ ~, ;~, ~ .~ ~ ~~ } ~~ ~l,, , ~ ~ ~~ ' ~ ~i l- h--' ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~~ ~~~ I ,ti kkk ~ ~x r , ~ _ ! , 3 i ~~ 1~~~ ~' ~ „I ~ i ~ y t ~~ ~ ~ ~ f t 1 { i i yy ~~fi p ~ .~. ~ j 15 e- r~ ~ C{f ~ f ~ ~ x i~' ~ ~ r 4' e i 11 ~ ] ~,~ ~. ~ i ~ f ~ ~ f' ~ f } ~ ~ ~ ; I ~ ~ 11~ ; ~ y? , ~~ y ~~ # I l~ ~ ~ '. ~ ~' g ~ I °' i Fa ~' ~ p' k ~E; ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~: ~ ~ ~F a'~:j ~ 'l. f ~ ~~ 3. I a s ii~ s }t r~~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Broadcast Report -~ Date/Time 06-13-2008 OZ:30:15 p.m. Transmit Header Text City of Meridian Idaho Local ID 1 2088884218 Local Name 1 Line 1 Local ID 2 Locai Name 2 Line 2 This document :Failed (reduced sample and details below) Document size : 8.5 "x11 " anararramrnyaewe~a .1,~ Ke4th Bird E II3IAN~,~ °~`°`~~'~~: .fOe BattOt\ ~ ®~ ~ ® Chedes Rountree Davtd Zarernha NOTICE OFPUBLICAWARENESS At1ERlQIAN Cl'CY COUNCR NOTICE pF AWARENESS lS HEREBY GIVEN that memt~rs of the Meridian City Courtdl may attend a Meridian Neightwrhood Town Hatt Meeting on dAortdaY, June 46, 2008 a! 8:30 P.AA. Tt1e Neighbarftood Town t-talt Meeting wltl be at the Mettdiart Fire Station No. S looted at 6~1 Norfh Lirtcier Road for an Open Hausa, Agency Presentation end Question & Answer Period. This is not a meeting or worksf~p. The public is welcome to alfend and for inquiries please oontact the Ctiy Clerk's Ctfflce at 888-4433. .~``~"{ ~ DATED this 13th day of Jurte, 20D8. r`°~~ $~ CffY CLER ~ fr 0r ~' ~~*~ '~ ~ ... Hotioe orAevarerteastat?own HeU M~inB-Jtare tH ~8 Page 1 of 1 Wease cal~eat the CM hits OMIw aP 8B8~4433 ~ feast 49 horse rbrp W the Tovm HaU~Me~L{g. i'otal Paaes Scanned : 1 T.a..l e...... r--r~_.v _ _~ No. lob Remote Station St rt Ti ~ ~v , 001 180 3810160 a me 02:13:33 0 Duration Pa es 9 Llne Mode Job T ype Results 002 180 8989559 p.m. 6-13-2008 02:13:33 06 00:00:55 111 1 EC HS CP9600 003 180 2088848723 p.m. -13-2008 02:13:33 06 00:00:14 1!1 1 EC HS CP21600 004 180 8886854 p.m. -13-2008 02:13:33 06 00:00:12 1!1 7 EC HS CP28800 005 180 2088985501 p.m. -13-2008 02:13:33 06 00:00:12 111 1 EC HS CP28800 006 180 8467366 p.m. -13-2008 02:13:33 06 1 00:00:11 1/1 1 EC HS CP31200 007 180 8950390 p.m. - 3-2008 02:13:33 p.m.06-13-2008 00:00:11 00:00:11 111 1J1 1 1 EC EC HS HS CP28800 CP31200 f p ' I . ~ I !' gy $ , ( t F ~y ' a, r. i' ~ 1, t t ~~ ~ F ~ } ~ i ~ ,~i I i q 9qM gb ~ ~ 'A ti ~ ~. i j. II , ~ 1 ~, ~ tp 1 ~ ~ ' ~ ~[ } 1 p6p F; i.. k` . i }} I I 1 a 1 ~, t ~ ~ ~ i~ is I ~ - ~; ~ e . ~ i~ ~ ; ~~ ~ ,.. ~ ~ ; i ~ ' ' { A. . d ~ I .. a r, 4 h + ~ F ` ~ . ~ , `~ ~ ~ i ~~ - ~ ~ C ' ~ i ' 8 M1 ii ~ i ... l ~ ~ ~ ; 4 ~ ~ i , ! ' ~ i y ~ i ~,, } I L , j, ~j ~, ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ s , I ~ ~ ~{ ~ ~ ti ,~ ~ }r I ~ $ I E. ~~' 1 ri ~ t ~ ~ ~ I ~ i d ; ~ [[ ~ ' ~~ ~ Y ~ 6`t ~ ~ J~f , ~~ ~ F, ,~ ,~ qq I ~ F( ~ F i ~i F ~l~ 111 t j ' j { ! n':' ~~ ~ ~ I'~ !, . E '4 . ~ { ~~ ~~ ~ ` L 1 ~ ~1, f r'. ~ I ii , , , ' ~ , `~ - ' ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ I ' 'i ~ - ~ ~:. I i . p ~ { _} i p i ~ ' I MayorTammy de Weerd City Council Members: Keith Bird Joe Borton Charles Rountree David Zaremba NOT/CE OF PUBLIC AWARENESS MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF AWARENESS IS HEREBY GIVEN that members of the Meridian City Council may attend a Meridian Neighborhood Town Hall Meeting on Monday, June 16, 2008 at 6:30 P.M. The Neighborhood Town Hall Meeting will be at the Meridian Fire Station No. 5 located at 6001 North Linder Road for an Open House, Agency Presentation and Question & Answer Period. This is not a meeting or workshop. The public is welcome to attend and for inquiries please contact the City 't3 t f f IG i f f Clerk's Office at 888-4433. DATED this 13th day of June, 2008. JAYC ````,111111111111//////F/ o '- SEAL HOLMAI`~ -CITY CLERK'; T ~s~ ' Q`~,~~'~ • -.. ,,. ,, ,,,, Notice of Awareness for Town Hall Meeting -June 16, 2008 Page 1 of 1 Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the Town Hall Meeting. ~ s#° ~ ~, ~ ~ s ~'4 , ~ t r ~l ''i ~ ~ ~ ff { { f I ~ ~ 11 T}} ~ tt { 3 ~ ~ 3 ~ .~1 -~ 4 gg i~-- t ~ ~ ~ _ , * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, _ _ 777 ` j ~ ~ t ~, t. iry T ~ ~ ~t _ i~ [f yy a ; ~ J fy _ ~ t :~' ~ i ,ai ,d' l ~. ~ ~ ~,,~ ~ 1 d.. t. ~. ~ti' ~i i ~~ i a ' ~ ~' s ! r ~~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ j ~' ~~ e ~~f - . ~~- ~ r •r, ~' ~ ; ~~~ , ~ s 7 ~ ~ 5 ~ ~,j r a ~ ~ ~ ; ~' ~ 3 F i~ , ~ J t }~ ~~ j . ~ c I=~~ 1 i f x ~ I ; ' ~ ,S ~ ~ F ~` ~ I ~ ~~" ! r' ~ e t ~ ~ ~ $: T Y -__ ~' { ~ f ~ Ir ~ tt bb `~ r i F{ 7 I SS ~ ~ 1 g )) p • , Meridian Citv Council Meeting June 17, 2008 A meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, June 17, 2008, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Charlie Rountree, Keith Bird, Joe Borton, and David Zaremba. Others Present: Bill Nary, Jaycee Holman, Anna Canning, Kyle Radek, Mark Niemeyer, Bob Stowe, Steve Siddoway, Keith Watts and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll-call Attendance: Roll call. X David Zaremba X Joe Borton X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird X Mayor Tammy de Weerd De Weerd: Okay. Good evening. I will go ahead and start tonight's meeting and thank you all for joining us tonight. For the record, it is Tuesday, June 17th. It's 7:00 o'clock. We will start tonight's meeting with roll call attendance. Madam Clerk. Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance: De Weerd: Item No. 2 is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you will all rise and join us in the pledge. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) Item 3: Community Invocation by Pastor Bob Cutler with Christ Lutheran Church: De Weerd: Item No. 3 is our community invocation. Tonight we will be led by Pastor Bob Cutler. He's with Christ Lutheran Church. I would ask you to join us in the community invocation or take this as a moment of reflection. Pastor. Cutler: Madam Mayor. We pray unless you, oh, Lord Omnipotent, keep this city, the wickedness and cunning of sinful people and exorbitant gas prices around us that enslave us, will certainly destroy us. Therefore, we come to you, oh, Lord, placing in your hands the needs of our city, asking you to give wisdom and ability, sane judgment and moral purpose to those who govern us. I know, Lord, that the task is difficult, the duties are many, and the responsibilities are heavy. Lord, we pray for this City Council, the Mayor, and all who serve in police, fire, and city capacities. Lord, we pray that you would support them with your might. That crime and lawlessness would be controlled and righteousness and integrity prevail. Lord we pray that you would make us -- help us to be law abiding citizens, ones who will seek the welfare of the community. Above all, _• ~ ~ ~~ k ~ ~ t r r ;~; ~ E - r, ~ ;;~ ,r ~ ., ' ~ ,, ' ~ €= F~ r ~ ~4 ~ { I ~~ ~! ! i ~~~ '' ~_ t ° ~ 4 R ~ ~' I f A S ~ ~! i f ' ' r 2 ti ~ 1 ~i'~ ~~ ,. ~~.,~ G ~ ~ ~. Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 2 of 55 Lord, grant that more people in our city will accept Jesus as their savior, serve him in faithfulness and untiring zeal. Make ours a truly Christian community, Lord, where the citizens are actively looking out for the interest and welfare of all, including the poorest in our community. Lord, give officials who will dedicate themselves wholeheartedly to you and to their task and to their assignments. And, then, Lord, then, yours was the glory and the praise through endless days, we pray this in Jesus' most precious name, amen. Madam Mayor, I have one other point that I wanted to -- if I might. De Weerd: Yes, pastor. Cutler: I'm the treasurer for Meridian Ministerial Association and we have an event that's taking place at the end of this month on the 28th of June that is going to be a benefit for people. My secretary at the church, Christ Lutheran Church, noticed that I was getting a lot more phone calls from people who were truly needy in our community, people who don't have the money to make the rent or for gas or whatever and so what we are doing is we are having a benefit car wash at our church with the funds all going towards Meridian Ministerial Fellowship, to provide for the neediest in our community and I would want to announce that at this meeting and let it be part of the record and let it be known that we would like to have as many people as could come to the benefit, so that the poorest in our community would benefit. That's on Saturday, June 28th, at 10:00 to 3:00 o'clock at Christ Lutheran Church. We are located really close to the intersection of Linder and Cheny Lane. Thank you, Madam Mayor. De Weerd: I know where you are. If you will also get that to my -- my office, I -- Cutler: It's on your schedule. De Weerd: It's on the website? Cutler: Yes, ma'am. Item 4: Adoption of the Agenda: De Weerd: Very good. Thank you so much. And amen on those gas prices. I hope you can utilize your relationships as well on that one. Item No. 4 is adoption of the agenda. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: In Item 5, the Consent Agenda, the request has been to remove Item 5-P, not to be discussed tonight. That will be heard another time. Under Section 6-C, the legal department, there has been a request to add an item two to discuss insurance for citizens use permits. And item C-3 to discuss City of Meridian Fun on the Fourth. And on Item 4 to discuss the traffic safety committee report. On the regular agenda, Item i 1 ~ ~ i " I j ! ~ ~ i ~ i ii t ~ ~~~ i{ ~ ~ F + ~ ~ 6 ,' 3 ~ . j i j f i C ' 1 ~ t ~ i i f1 N~ ~ ~ ~ it , a w , t . ~ ~P ' f ~ 7 i.~ I , + I ~ ' ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~' ~ i i t ~ i ~ 1 1. _ ~r . ~I tt - ~ i ~ ~ r ~ `s k i~ '"~; ~ ~` ~ k I ~~ ~ ~ ; AA Y ~f ~ S ~ ~ ~ t ! ~ 1 ~ j . i ~~ s ~ ~~ ~ F 3 .t~ ~~ S ~ ~ ~ y ~ ' ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ . ({{ 4fs f ~ G ~ i ~ ~ F ~ ~ i E " ~ ~ ~ ~~ i i ~ 9 t S ~ I ~ 1 i a i- '.1 i ~ l i ~ j~ _ ~ r ~ ~i ( , '1 { ) p F A~ .I ~ ~ ~ ~ if I Ev ~ I: i 1 1 1 ~ _~l ~ ~ ~ t M r I 1, ~; t 1 ~ ~ i ~ .I'a ~ f ~~~ c ~ ~ ~ t t ; ~ ~ f ~ , ~~ Meridian City Council • June 17, 2008 Page 3 of 55 s 13, there is a request to continue that until July 22nd. And on Item 16, the proposed ordinance number is 08-1369. Item 17, the proposed ordinance number is 08-1370. And with those modifications, I move that we adopt the agenda. Bird: Second. De Weerd: Okay. I have motion and a second to adopt the agenda as amended. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 5: Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of June 3, 2008 City Council Regular Meeting: B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 08- 003 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 12.06 acres from RUT to R-40 (10.56 acres) and C-C (1.15 acres) zones for Reaencv at River Valley (REVISED) by Mason & Stanfield - 2500 North Eagle Road: C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 08-004 Request for Conditional Use Permit fora multi-family development in a proposed R-40 zoning district for Reaencv at River Valley by Mason & Stanfield - 2500 North Eagle Road: D. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: VAR 08-002 Request for Variance to UDC Table 11-3C-6 for a reduction in the number of parking spaces required for multi-family dwellings in covered carports or garages for Reaencv at River Valley by Mason & Stanfield - 2500 North Eagle Road: E. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: VAR 08-004 Request fora Variance to UDC 11-3H-4B.2.a, which prohibits new approaches directly accessing a state highway to allow a temporary access to SH 55/Eagle Road for Great Wall Restaurant by Kinsan Chan - 2590 North Eagle Road: F. Sewer Easement Agreement for Javker's Subdivision by Treehaven, LLC: G. Reguest for Easement Relinquishment for SEC Marketplace No. 1 by Public Works Department: H. Chance Order No. 12 for North Black Cat Trunk Sewer with Brown Construction. Inc. for $12,534.00: ~ II ~ l' ~~~~ - bF i !I ~ N `- i it 1 ~• : ` C~ ~ ~: R. t ~ ~ ' ,, ' f r ~~ }~ t 1~ ( ? $ ~ ~~, ~ !" ~' f I ~. h ~ }' h ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ( I a q ~ I 1 ' ii C I ~ t { ,. i . ~ ' FFF` j ~ i ~' 4 t. ~ ~ 1 ~ J I'A' ii T ~ t i ~ i C ~~ ~a _ l ~~ ~ ~ I Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 4 of 55 I. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Aareement for Woodland Springs: J. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Aareement for Southeast Corner Marketplace No 2: K. Aareement supporting Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Economic Development/Slum ~ Blight Project: L. Award Bid for Grant for Sr. Citizen Center Phase 2 ICDBG-04- III-01-SR for Repair, Re-Stripe, Re-Design of Parking Lots and Spaces for Meridian Senior Center by Henry Boswell Paving for $6,782.82: M. New Liauor License for Brian Wetzel dba Gelato Cafe located at 2053 East Fairview Suite 101: N. Transfer of Owner for Beer License from Gelato Cafe LLC to Brian Wetzel: O. Right of Wav Easement Aareement (Trafi'ic Signals) with Ada Countv Hiahwav District for Meridian Fire Station No 5: De Weerd: Item 5 is our Consent Agenda. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: Noting that item 5-P has been removed from the Consent Agenda, I move that we adopt the Consent Agenda and for the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Consent Agenda with the change. If there is no discussion, Madam Clark. Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 6: Department Reports A. Mayors Office: Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 5 of 55 1. Appointment of Steven Yearslev to the Meridian Parks and Recreation Commission: De Weerd: Item 6 under Department Reports. Counsel, in front of you you do have some information, the nominee that I bring you tonight for confirmation. Steven Yearsley. He has participated in the naming activity of Renaissance Park. I met him, actually, at last year's National Night Out celebration and he immediately engaged his homeowners association with the naming of that park and I believe he has sincere and enthusiastic interest in serving on our parks commission and I bring him for your confirmation. Are there any questions? Rountree: I have none. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: I move we confirm your appointment of Steven Yearsley to the Meridian Parks and Recreation Commission. Borton: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the appointment of Steven Yearsley. Madam Clerk, will you call roll. Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 13. Finance Department: 1. American Wallcover Change Order #3 for City requested change in Scope for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $10,856.10. 2. TTE-Precom Chanae Order #2 for City Requested Change in Scope for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $3,470.96: 3. Designer Floors Chanae Order #1 for City Requested Change in Scope for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $5,597.00 4. Seal Co. Chanae Order #2 for work on loading dock in original budget but not yet bid for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $2,750.00 ~.~ a F ~ I, ~~ k ~;~. ~ ~ ~ 6 i p r ) ,}~r~f } { ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ a ~ , ~ 4 a x b, ~ " r ~ ~ ~~ ~ i + ~ ~ ., - 4 ~ a ~ t t ~' i t~ !` 7 3 ~ ~ ~i pp~ ~iJ ~ 1 t i ~" t$ j.°~ pp _ ~ l,tr (, p Y~-- i , ~~ I # 3 ~ r ~ ail s~~ ~ ,~ l ~. ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ f~. ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,~ ~~ ~ Its ~ ro fi ~ ~. ~~ { ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~'' ~ - j: ~ t t ~ a E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ jj~ 9 2 ~ , r ~t ! ~ ` i' ~~ a j It i.~ p1E i ~ ~ ~ i. et~ i ~ 1 ~ _~j ~r ~ F ~ ~ g ~ ~' `'4t t(" ~ 17i ~ ~ ~ i i Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 6 of 55 5. Hobson Chance Order #3 for City Requested Change in Scope for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $40,499.00 6. Approve Bid Package and Agreement of City Hall Phase V with M.R. Preist. Inc. dba Advanced Sign ~ Design for $42,954.29: De Weerd: Thank you, Council. Okay. Under the Finance Department, I will tum this over to Mr. Watts. Watts: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Council Members. Tonight we have five change orders brought to you for the City Hall project in one bid award. I have Tom Coughlin from Petra here to answer any technical questions you may have as well. I will call attention to the Item 6 -- B-6 is the interior sign package. That is an award for $42,954.29. We received two bids for that package and M.R. Preist, Incorporated, is our low bidder. Answer any questions you may have. De Weerd: Thank you, Mr. Watts. Council, any questions for staff or -- Rountree: I have none. Bird: I have none. De Weerd: Okay. I would appreciate a motion, then, at this time. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move that we approve the change orders from American Wall Cover, $10,856.10. TTE-Precom, $3,470.96. Designer Floors change order, $5,597.00. Seal Co., $2,750.00. And Hobson is $40,499.00. And, then, to award the bid in phase five for the interior sign package to M.R. Preist, doing business as Advanced Sign and Design, for $42,954.29. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Rountree: I have none. Bird: I have none. De Weerd: Okay. Madam Clerk, will you, please, call roll. ~~~A ,,~ ~ , F I i, ~ n ' ~. } ;.' A ~ 3 E' ~ Lz I k 111 ~ ' ? i ~ -~ ~ i t i ~ v t ~ i ~ ` } ~ a , ~ t ~~ ~ .~ ~ ~ 1 ~ {' , ~ ,~ ., f 4 1 ~ ~ , i ~ ~ k ~ .~LC ~ R ~ ) i , g i ~. ~ ~ _ y 77 ~ 1~ < < 144 5 '~ r tj t I r ~ a ~ I- ~ ~ ~ fE I ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ 9~ .. ~ d :, ~ I ~ i ~; ~ ~~ ~t ~r~ a ~ ~ ,:~ Y ~ ~ ~~ n I j ~ ~ ~~ i ~ L ~ ~ , C I - ~ L ~ I! f1' ~ t~ ~ t'~~ t d 3` ! 1 ~ 1 S ~ ~ - 1 gi §, I ~ ~ ~ ~ . [ 1 Y i ~ ~ f $ ~ ~ ~ ~ - I i~ ~ 7 -_ i ~ t e ~ j ~, ~ b Ii: F ~ ~ rq ~ {~ Y u ;~' k i ~ ~ ii k j ~ 3 ~' ~ f ~ t ~. f~. / 1h ~ ~~ ~ i f i' ` kky F~ r~•~ 4 ~ 1 . I ~+~ k i ~ ~ 5 I " ~ 1 ~ ~ b 1 ~c p ~ ~ > ~ ` J 1Ao-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 , ~ ~ ~~- ~ r r ~ ) ~ t ~ ~ r ~ ~ ` ~ ~ : ' 1 I ' "~ Y Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 7 of 55 Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Council, we have tried to better reflect if -- the nature of the change order. Much of this is already in the budget, it just has to be -- come in front of you and so does this language clarify it better or do we still need some improvement? Bird: Madam Mayor, I think it's great. It's just something that -- that it's been requested, it isn't because the city requested, not because of a mistake or something in the plan or something. I think that's all that -- I think that's all that the public was asking for was just, you know, why was the change order and these were all extra work as requested by us. Watts: I tried to show when we were within budget, so -- Bird: You have done a great job. C. Legal Department: 1. Citizens Use Permit Application - Authorization & Indemnity Agreement: 3. Discussion on Insurance for Citizen's Use Permits: De Weerd: Okay. Item 6-C. I will tum this over to Mr. Nary. Nary: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. There is actually three items, not four, because the third item you added and the first one are really the same thing. On your packet there is a citizen use permit application and it says authorization and indemnity agreement. Trying to get it pulled up here quickly. What this -- what this is is this is in relation to the city's event that is for the Fourth of July to be held in Storey Park and adjacent to Storey Park. It is a requirement under our current ordinance that we provide this indemnification to the Ada County Highway District for the closure requested -- closure of Watertower for that event that night and our review of it we didn't feel it was appropriate for the Mayor to sign it without the Council's authorization, since it is an indemnity agreement. So, that's why it's in front of you tonight. They still have some paperwork to fill out from the Parks Department to complete the application, but we wanted to bring this to you to get your approval, for the Mayor to sign that when the rest of the paperwork is completed. Do you have any questions? De Weerd: Council? Bird: I have none. Rountree: I have no questions. Madam Mayor? Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 8 of 55 De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Rountree. L.1 Rountree: I would move that we authorize the Mayor to sign the citizen's use permit application once it's complete and submitted to ACRD. Bird: Second. De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 2. Discussion on Citizen's Use Permit Application for City of Meridian Fun on the 4tn. De Weerd: Okay. Mr. Nary, item two. Nary: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. The second item is -- is a similar issue. Part of our ordinance requires that we collect when someone requests to close a street for say a block party, that we require they provide us an insurance indemnification, because Ada county may require it. In discussing it with Ada county, their feeling is is if they need it -- and the example they gave us -- a large event, like Dairy Days, for example -- when that is requested they do require insurance and they require proof of it to be provided to them before they would close streets for parades or large events. But for a small event, a block party, and a neighborhood homeowners association that wants to use their common area and maybe close one street or something for some event, they don't require it. So, the only requirement is ours trying to support theirs. We don't have any liability to those types of events, because it's not our street and it's not on our property. So, what I was going to basically ask you tonight is in our temporary use ordinance I would like to bring forward to you a repeal of just that section only that we will no longer require it and the reason we are bringing it forward separate and apart from any other changes is we have had a request from the police department in relation to National Night Out. A number of the events they are trying to get scheduled now are running into this issue where many homeowners associations don't have some umbrella insurance coverage, because, again, they don't necessarily need it. Now, the risk may be theirs and there may be an issue, but it's not the city's risk, it's still theirs. So, our requirement really doesn't serve any purpose. There is no need to protect us. We are protecting an entity that feels that they are able to protect themself of they need it. They can require it before they close the street, regardless of what our ordinance says, so they don't feel it's necessary. So, with your permission I'd like to bring back a repeal of that section next week, so we can get that out of the way and not impede the activities for National Night Out. De Weerd: Okay. Council, any questions? : ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~~r :, € ,I ~ ~ ,~ ~s ~~ . i y ~~ , C , I ' t ~ i a ' i ~ ~ ~ ' ~ It e K ~ ~? S f iii r ~ i 1 f I 1'. ~~. ~ ~, ~ ~ i ~ ~ , I f~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~, ~ ! ~: ~ ' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ i l f ~' tea a~ '~~' ~ ? t I }~ ~ i ~ ~ . F : i , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~ F i R ~ ~ t .~. ~ ~ i o-~ ~. ~ ~ I ~ ,c. S ~~'~~ ~ r / ~ ;a 4 ~~, , ~ _ ,' .' ~ ~ F i #~ ~ t A f ~ '~ F r ~ ~ I j F`1 ~, ~ i ~ F y ~ . ti~ ~ ~ 7! $ F' i ~ ~ t I I ~ ~ ff i~' r f. ' I S ~ - ~ 1' ~ ~; ~, ~ 1 s F f . 4 4 }. i § i k +~ i ~ ~ i . E 1 H ~ i. ~ t }} { I l .ICJ i' { v f ` 1 ~ I i , ' I i li ~ j . Ik~ I ~ ~ ff .S l~ ` :'k ~ ~ ". ~ j ~ ~~ ,- 1 1 ~ ; ~ ~ . ^i '1 ~;~. a E i ~ =i ~~ ~- ~~r, f ~' i- ~ ~ s Meridian City Council • June 17, 2008 Page 9 of 55 Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: I agree with the logic, but in considering what the general public may or may not know, rather than totally repeal it, could we remove it as a requirement and somehow state it to remind them that they need to check with ACRD or the road authority, depending on what street it is? I hate to have it disappear entirely and not be warning people that they may run into that requirement with the responsible agency. Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Councilmember Zaremba, we can certainly look at the language. My only -- my only concern is just even trying to give warnings to folks about other agencies, I'm going to imagine there are occasions we are going to forget some and so I don't want us to sort of be the catch-all for everybody either. But we can certainly look at some language that may simply say, you know, unless required by another agency or something else, so it's clear that there is maybe other people out there that may require something, we just won't be requiring it. So, we can certainly do that. De Weerd: But, you know, ACHD is also a signature on the citizen use permit. If they require it, I'm sure they will not sign it until that -- Nary: Right. De Weerd: -- their issues are addressed. So, I think there is adequate -- Zaremba: It's covered that way. De Weerd: Uh-huh. Zaremba: Thank you. Nary: So, if that's okay, Council, I'll bring a repeal of that particular section. Right. Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. 4. Traffic Safety Committee Report: Nary: The last thing I'm going to hand out -- I wanted to give you folks an update on the Traffic Safety Commission. I have noted lately we have had a number of issues that have come before the Traffic Safety Commission that have been generated many times by phone calls either to one of the Council members or to the Mayor's office and so what I'd like to do is just -- briefly just tell you some of things that we are working on, so that you are aware that they are in process. We don't have a recommendation tonight in front of you, but we did have a traffic safety meeting today. We do meet monthly. It's la ~_ ~ ~' : I~ ~ ~' ~ ' l~ ~, ~ ~, ~ f ~ ; a ' i 1 E ( f. ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 3 ~~ ~ ; r ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~: k ~ I ~. ~ ~ ~ 34 ` 4 ~ ' Yi... ~. ~ }SI.. ~ j i 4' Y r `y T ~ ~ i i I ' ~ I Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 10 of 55 the third Tuesday of every month. The items that we discussed today was reviewing our ordinance and considering whether bylaws should be made and the will of the commission was that once City Hall opened, that the traffic safety commission would all -- would meet in City Hall, rather than at the police department, to allow the public greater access, as well as more consistency if all the commissions of the city meet in one location, it would help the public being able to participate and be there more often. What I have passed out in front of you is a map ACHD provides us today. I know Members of the Council and the Mayor's office have had inquires of their own, as well as from citizens about the speed limits on various roadways and where there are some changes. To be honest, many of the times when I talk to citizens who call about this type of issue, many of them do believe that somehow it's completely randomly generated as to where these speed limits are, but, in reality, there is certainly a lot of thought that goes into those, but -- De Weerd: Oh, I thought this was confirmation that it was random. Nary: No. You know, just as a real quick -- I guess information about -- the traffic safety commission has reviewed a number of these roadways over the years, based on citizen complaints, based on crashes, citations that get issued, complaints by citizens, the engineering of the roadway and the particular roadway location, the topography, the development that's along the roadway, the houses that front the roadway, the types of businesses that are there -- so, a lot of those get discussed. What we did today is we handed out this map to all the members of the Commission and at our next meeting the discussion is going to be is how do we -- how do we take a bite out of this elephant, so we make sure that we can give you better information and better recommendations that we can pass onto ACHD in regards to the roadway and the speeds. We, again, didn't decide today whether we want to deal with the east-west streets first, the major arterials first, nor to the south, troublesome spots, specific areas where complaints have been. So, we haven't made those decisions yet, but this is at least probably our priority agenda item for probably the next two or three months, to be able to give you back better information from the Commission as to why some of the roadways have five or six different speed changes along them for different stretches and what the reasons were. There was a discussion about Calderwood, that we have had a number of complaints about traffic cutting through Calderwood off of Meridian Road in the moming. We faxed some information from me today for ACHD to discuss the potential of making it maybe a no tum during the moming rush hour times, so that people aren't cutting through Southern Springs out through Meridian Green's neighborhood, because the traffic backs up at that light. People will be cutting through trying to get to either Southeast -- Southwest 5th or Southeast 5th or Southeast 3rd. So, they were going to look at some potential ways of traffic, basically traffic directional signs that would keep people from using that as acut-through, so we discussed that today. There was a request to look at a stop sign on Broadway and West 2nd near the senior center. The ACHD representative agreed to come to the next -- whenever it was set up with Mayor's office and the senior center -- senior center's board to discuss what their concems are, where the traffic flow issues are and the concems there. One of the concems ACHD had is that a number of the parking spaces -- you're all familiar with the senior center. Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 11 of 55 • None of the parking spaces are in the right of way, so if they were to change some of the traffic configuration there, they may have to take some of the parking spaces that are on Broadway that are in the right of way to make sure there is adequate turning movements there, that may or may not be a good thing. So, he was willing to go to the meeting to hear what their concerns are and see what ACHD could do to remedy that. We had just a generalized discussion about Cedar Springs. There has been some issues about neighborhood parking and parking next to the park and that's something that we are going to probably be working on through the Mayor's office and through the police department and the traffic safety may have an opportunity to provide you some recommendations on that. And the last, there was a question that came up about the access road on Mountain View and they -- ACHD -- there was -- currently was a concern that there is a speed limit sign as you head towards the school. This is a new street that was just opened this year that the school district helped fund, it's call Puppet Street, it comes off of Locust Grove and accesses Mountain View. There is a speed limit sign as you enter the school -- the school property. There is no speed limit sign as you exit the school, but you have to stop at Locust Grove before you can enter the roadway anyway, so they haven't had any issues of traffic or -- I mean they said there certainly might be speeding there, but they haven't had issues of people running through the stop sign or collisions or problems out on Locust Grove, but they would look at putting another 25 mile an hour stop sign on that road if they could do that. So, those are the issues we talked about today. Again, I just know you have had a lot of these issues brought to your attention and wanted you to know they were on the radar. Do you have any questions? De Weerd: Well, I guess I would invite the Council, if there is any areas on this map you want to circle to have them discuss specifically and bring back to you, we would invite that as well. Okay. Thank you, Mr. Nary. Item 7: Items Moved from Consent Agenda: De Weerd: There no items moved from the Consent Agenda. Item 8: Continued Public Hearing from May 6, 2008: AZ 06-063 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 38.68 acres from RUT and R-1 zones to C-G zones for Waltman Proaertv (aka Browning Plaza) by Waltman, LLC - 505, 521, 615 and 675 Waltman Lane: Item 9: Continued Public Hearing from May 6, 2008: PP 08-001 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 52 commercial /office lots and 1 common lot on 38.21 acres in a proposed C-G zoning district for Browning Plaza (aka Waltman Propelrty) by SLN Planning, Inc. - 505, 521, 615 and 675 W. Waltman Lane: De Weerd: So, we will move to Item No. 8. And, Anna -- I guess we will move to eight and nine. '~ ~ ~ it :~ ~~ ; i F t ~ 1 ~' ~ ~ F P ~ V ~ ~• -~~ b((( . ~ I 1 `, ' ~ l .i i ~ t tR f i li ~ ~ ~~ r ~ ii ' ~ 4 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ t, ,~ ~ ~ '$l f ~ ',. ' ~~ ~ ' y ~~ ~ is i i ^~ S ~ 14 f ~ 3 tl~a' ~ f. ~~s'~~ t R 2 ' ~ .z 'i E ~ sr !. T ~j•- ~ ~ ~ €~ s '~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ t~ i .; ..~ . ~ ~i 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ _ ~ ~ i1 j ,. ~' i ~ :.~ x ~ ~ i .• ,. ~ . ~q- r f ' ~ i~. r. ~ [a ~ ~ .,r 'i ~ r ~ ~ ~ .,~~. ~~ , , ~j, i i~ f'+~ 1 e 1 . ' ~~ f'. ~ ' f } 4 ` I . !~ F ~ r ~ ~>, ~~ ( ~ r ~ ~ ~ '~E r ? , a. I .1I i F' f~ f, ~- ~ ~' I~. Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 12 of 55 Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: I will be recusing myself. C De Weerd: Okay. Okay. These two items were continued from May 6th on AZ 06-063 and PP 08-001. Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I'll give you abrief -- loss of words today. De Weerd: Summary. Canning: A brief summary of what we did last -- at the last hearing. Thank you. This project is located on the south side of Waltman, east of the Landing Subdivision, and directly north of I-84. The applications before you tonight are for annexation and zoning of 38.68 acres to C-G and the preliminary plat for 40 building lots and two common lots. The proposed development and concept plan includes -- depicts a big box retail building, a hotel, offices, and a retail center for a variety of commercial opportunities. A hotel is in the southeast comer -- southwest comer. And the big box is self-evident. The proposed commercial square footage is approximately 400,000 square feet of office, hotel, big box retail and smaller retail spaces. There are currently 21 buildings proposed. And we do have elevations and an altemative concept plan. I will get to that. The outstanding issues from your last hearing were Ruddy Street, whether it should be public or private. Corporate Drive extension. The buffer along the western boundary. Compatible uses adjacent to residential properties. A loop frontage road. The split corridor intersection on Waltman and Meridian. And Shawn Nickel has provided a letter to Mayor and Council addressing those outstanding issues of concern. I'll let him present his letter to you, along with that altemative concept plan, and, then, I just have a couple clarifications if Mr. Nickel doesn't address them in his -- in his -- De Weerd: Comments. Canning: It's going to be a long night. Thank you. That's all, Madam Mayor. De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions for Anna at this time? Rountree: She has me confused. De Weerd: Anna, will you be able to put this up on the overhead? Nickel: Madam Mayor, most of those are on -- on the screen. De Weerd: Oh. Okay. Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 13 of 55 Canning: Madam Mayor, the only one I don't have is the list of uses. Do you want me to get it running for that? De Weerd: I think Mr. Nickel can probably go over the list of uses. Canning: Okay. Nickel: Thank you, Madam Mayor and Council. Shawn Nickel. 6223 North Discovery Way, Suite 200, Boise, Idaho. De Weerd: Thank you. Nickel: Here tonight representing the developer. When you sent us away at the last meeting you gave us some specific concems and direction that you had and what we did is we -- we went back and worked with staff, got together ourselves to determine what we were trying to accomplish with this -- with this project and I think one thing we realized is that changing the plan halfway through the process is probably not the best way to go about it, because it did provide additional concems and possibly going back to Planning and Zoning Commission for their review or re-review. And so based on the input that they gave us the last meeting, we have decided to go forward with the original plan that we have -- that we had, that we submitted, both ACHD -- well, ACRD, your staff, and the Planning and Zoning Commission initially reviewed. Excuse me. And I think one of the key concems was -- there was many, but one of them we will start with was the Ruddy access point. And our idea of bringing it through the development as more of a private aisle, rather than a public street. I think we are in agreement with -- with the Council's concems that even though it does place a burden on this property to funnel traffic from the Landing Subdivision, it's still a problem that exists and we realize that. We do need to get traffic from the Landing through out the development out to -- out Waltman and to Meridian Road as -- as seamless as possible, without creating any additional concems and so for that reason alone we are going with that original plan of Ruddy being a public street out to Waltman and, then, out to -- to Meridian Road. The second -- the second issue that came up was the Corporate Drive extension and that was from Waltman Lane north as it goes over the creek and connects to that existing stub and although I did voice our concems about requiring off-site improvements, we still prefer not to have that burden this project. We do -- we do understand where Council and where staff was coming from in their concems with that and so what we are proposing tonight is to enter into a condition that at a certain build out of the project we will be responsible for Corporate -- Corporate Drive being built and the -- the threshold that we are proposing a 350,000 square foot build out of the project and we have kind of based that on our -- our initial -- our initial design and thought that we were going to have between 440 -- 400 and 450,000 square feet of retail in the center and with ACHD's recommendation of an 8,000 vehicle trip threshold, based on our about 10,300 vehicle trip production that we are producing in this development, so there is about an 80 percent -- that's where we came up with that 350,000 square foot number was about 80 -- 80 percent of that -- of that -- the vehicle trips that ACRD has limited us to in their - - in their review. So, one of the conditions that we are proposing in our development Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 14 of 55 agreement, because this just came out of ACHD's recommendation, was to require a phasing plan to be submitted and I envision this to happen probably when that first building goes in, because more than likely we are going to have the anchor as the first building. At that time that's going to set the stage for the rest of the development, so I think it's appropriate that at that first phase or that first building permit that we would submit the phasing plan to the city and to the highway district to kind of show how the rest of the development is probably going to develop out and that will give us a better idea as we move through the process when we get to that 350,000 square foot threshold. The third concern that came out of the Council meeting was timing of the split corridor project with ACHD, that being a kind of a key for when this project comes about. If staff can put -- do you have an area map that you can put back up? That will work. Thanks, Anna. As a condition of approval we -- that we are not contesting, we understand that until the split corridor is completed, we are not going to be pulling any building permits for this project and we accept that and understand that. We have worked a condition that we can start our site improvements while that construction is going on, but we do understand that until that comdor is complete we are not going to be receiving any building permits. Councilman Rountree wanted to know some timing and also what that comdor was going to look like and so I did provide, both in the packet just I gave you and with staff that she can put on the screen e Canning: I'm sorry, Shawn, what did you want? Nickel: The split corridor example that I gave you. This right here is what that split corridor is going to look like. How it's going to -- how it's going to operate. This is a closer look at that. With this being Waltman going west right here. And, then, obviously, a signalized intersection. The timing on that -- I talked to ACHD today and that is the 2009 schedule. Gary Inselman thinks and hopes that it would probably be complete by fall of '09 and probably started sometime -- he says it's going to take about six months, so spring to summer that it would start, with a fall completion date. From my understanding, that is -- that is funded and designed and I believe it's starting to go out for bid -- it will go out for bid this -- later this year. De Weerd: Fall. Nickel: This fall. Yes. Thank you. The next issue that came out -- we were -- in trying to keep the flexibility with this development, not knowing what the uses were going to be, staff and the applicant went around and around many times on how to protect the existing residential uses from potential conflicting uses in the development. So, what we proposed at the last meeting -- and we are -- want to continue to propose that as a condition, is to build a buffer that includes a sound wall along that western buffer, a portion of the north right here against those adjacent properties. Staff, could you put that example up that -- and I do have that in the packet also for you if you want to take a look at it. Excuse me. So, what that -- that buffer would entail is a 25 foot buffer from the property line, with a three foot berm, a six foot high masonry sound wall and, then, some evergreen coniferous trees planted on that -- on that berm to provide additional buffering. We would like this -- this lay -- or this exhibit included in the development Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 15 of 55 • agreement as an exhibit for how that wall will -- or how that buffer will be constructed. In keeping in the theme of those uses most compatible, trying to make those compatible uses, one of the Council Members wanted us to come back with a list of some uses that might not be appropriate due to their -- the type of use that they were and so what we have done is we have proposed to exclude through the development agreement in the C-G zone the following uses: Drinking establishments. Drive-thru establishments. Fuel sales -- fuel sale facilities. Fuel sale truck stop facilities. And vehicle washing facilities. Those appear to be the extreme uses that -- even with a sound wall and some buffering probably wouldn't be appropriate next to -- next to residential. Again, that -- that list would be included in the development agreement as a condition of approval. And, finally, the -- if staff could go back to this area map again, please. Thank you. The question of a loop or frontage road came up and it came up in our discussions -- or it started in our discussions, I believe, because we were trying to make Ruddy a nonpublic access point. So, I believe that turning Ruddy back into a public access and moving the traffic, we are -- I think we are on the right path, but in looking at the configuration of these properties to the east of our site, the unknown design --design for this interstate interchange here and what ITD is ultimately going to do, this is their property right here, what they are ultimately going to do with an on-ramp, we just did not feel that it's feasible to have a frontage road, just because of the compact area that we are -- that we are dealing with right here. If we -- you know, if we had a lot more area here, I think it would be appropriate to have a frontage road like you do on the east side of Meridian -- Meridian Road, but, again, I believe with Ruddy being a public road, we will be able to get that traffic -- to take care of that traffic -- both that we are creating and also with the Landing development. A couple of additional issues that weren't necessarily brought up at the last meeting, but I just want to -- we would like to include in our development agreement -- staff did show you an altemative concept plan and what this plan shows is, again, Ruddy Street being a public access, but it moved some of the uses around on the property. If it's not too confusing, we would like to include this as an exhibit in the development agreement, only to show that there is an altemative plan that would be out there. Now, we understand that if we do intend to reconfigure it, we'd have to come in and modify the development agreement and also work with ACRD and if you find it -- if you feel it appropriate -- well, not if you feel it appropriate -- also work with staff on -- on this, but, again, just to recognize that this is an altemative plan, if it's not -- if it's not too much trouble. The -- and, then, the other issue is -- and it's a minor one. I did talk to your attorney and the staff about this and this is to recognize the existing agriculture uses on the property until the property is developed. Right now it is grazing cattle. We'd like that use to remain until the development. So, we would propose a condition referencing that. And, then, very briefly, the -- the modified conditions in the development agreement that we'd like to recognize -- and I'll read those into the record and you'd also have that in my letter and staff has a copy. With the exception of the hotel, hours of operation for businesses along the western and northwest property boundaries adjacent to permanent residential, are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., unless the adjacent uses are changed into nonresidential uses. And that's in line with what came out of the Planning and Zoning Commission as a recommendation. Secondly, all commercial use -- all commercial use buildings greater than 100,000 square feet that are proposed on the site that are within a hundred feet of Meridian City Council • • June 17, 2008 Page 16 of 55 a residential district or use shall -- shall obtain a Conditional Use Permit. That way if this -- for example, if this concept plan goes in and we were to locate the big box and it was going to be closer than ahundred -- closer than a hundred feet from the property line, and it was greater than 100,000 square feet, that would kick in the Conditional Use Permit, that way the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff are going to get to look at it again to make sure we are addressing loading, we are addressing parking, lighting, and all that with that type of development in that -- in that area. And, then, finally, all structures along the west and northwest property boundaries adjacent -- adjacent to existing residences shall be limited in height to two stories and shall have a minimum setback of 25 feet adjacent to existing residences, Unless the adjacent uses are changed into nonresidential uses, with the exception of the proposed hotel and if a hotel is built at the southwest comer of the site as depicted on the concept plan, a 25 foot setback shall be required for the first story, one hundred foot setback shall be required for the second story and a 200 foot setback shall be required for anything greater than two story adjacent to the existing residences. And, then, I just want to point out that with the C-G zoning that we are asking for, if the -- if the use in the code requires a Conditional Use Permit, we will still adhere to that and go through that normal process. So, I hope we addressed all your concerns. I think we have and I will stand for any questions you have. De Weerd: Council, any questions at this point? Rountree:. Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: Shawn, the traffic projections that you used and ACRD based their 80 percent vehicle trips on for development, account for the traffic that would be coming from the Landing? Nickel: It did. I believe they accounted for approximately 500 additional trips. I can pull my -- Rountree: If you -- you can do that in your rebuttal. And what improvements or how far down are improvements going to be made on Waltman Lane with a split corridor and/or a future project that would involve Waltman? Nickel: If I understand your question, the split corridor I believe comes down about right here, so that will be improved with ACHD's improvements. And, then, our -- as conditioned, we are going to be responsible for construction of Waltman and, actually, do a realignment of Waltman around these houses right here, down to the intersection of where Corporate will come in and, then, the Ruddy connection right here. Then, as for the condition that we are agreeing to enter into that at that threshold, we will be responsible for the Corporate connection right here. That leaves only one part of the whole pie -- that is the area of Waltman from here down to right there. We are -- we understand that in order to make this project viable, we are going to have to address S Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 17 of 55 that -- that roadway. We have talked to ACRD and it is in their staff report that we can enter into an extraordinary impact fee area with them to help us improve that one stretch of Waltman that's off site that is not part of their -- their construction plan at this time. Rountree: So, to put that in English, you're saying you would be improving that with extraordinary impact -- or ACHD would be improving that with extraordinary impact fees? Nickel: That's the mechanism that we feel is going to be the best to get that improved. Rountree: Thank you. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: On the one hand, thank you for making life easier. I was immovable about that being a public street, so I appreciate your making that change back. Nickel: You saw I was looking at you when I was talking. Zaremba: The -- during the public testimony from some of the neighbors, who are currently -- I guess this is Waltman Lane and ends down there, three or maybe four properties that are staying outside of your parcel, they were concerned about traffic. I happened to notice the other day on Overland just west of Cole beyond -- I think it's Entertainment, there are some streets where people have trouble with cars turning in and U-turning as they came off of the interstate and found themselves going the wrong way on Cole. ACRD has allowed them to put no U-turn signs and dead end signs and all sorts of stuff and I wonder if it might help if you would do that roughly right there, where people have the last chance to turn -- Nickel: Absolutely. I think that's a good idea. Zaremba: If you would put up some signs like that, I think that would go a long way to addressing whether or not strangers would be coming down there looking to U-turn in their yards. Nickel: I agree. Yeah. Zaremba: I think that would help. Now, discuss the alternate concept plan a little bit. -- just visually that's more attractive to me. Nickel: The reason it is is because it was actually drawn by a commercial developer that knows what they are -- what they are doing. And, again, that's -- and maybe I can defer to him to get up if you want some real specifics, but it would be a big -- you know, f ~ ~4 4 . , ~ ~ i ffi Z ~ ~ ' i s ~ ~; i II ~ 1 b ~ ~: 4 h~ I i. q ~ t. E. ~ ~. i ~ ~ ~ r 9 '. : "3 F ~ ti ~. '.- 1 ~~ ~~ I ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ - ~. G'E ~f , i i ~~ . s r } y ~~ t 1'~ ~ ~ ~;. ~~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ t ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ti ~ ~ I ~ . .I G l ~, ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ .. ~ " ~ ~~' ~. ~ ~ ~~ t ; cl~ ~~.~" ` 5`:~ ~ 1 y~ Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 18 of 55 • a big box over in this area right here, possibly shuffling the hotel over here or keeping this asmaller -- a smaller box. And, then, creating a nice plaza -- a nice plaza look right there. And, then, focusing the building back kind of towards the southeast. That's the best I can do you on that. But, again, keeping Ruddy as a public street with -- you know, with -- it was just on the plaza concept right there. Yeah. If this did go through, they would have to come back in and modify the preliminary plat and the development agreement, we understand that. Zaremba: Even though I have commented on it, I -- my instinct would be -- and perhaps we will get a comment from staff -- since you would have to come back anyhow, I would rather not confuse the issue, I'd rather have one concept plan and not show a concept. plan and an alternate if you came back sometime later and said this is going to work better for us, then, we would listen to it, then, but that's just astart -- Nickel: And that's why I stated at the beginning if it becomes too confusing, we'd just as soon leave this plan out and keep the plan that matches our preliminary plat from our original proposal. Zaremba: Okay. And, Madam Mayor, while Mr. Nickel is here, if I may ask a question of Director Canning. He's offering, if I understood, that if there is a larger building along this property line that is going to be within a hundred feet of the residents, that they would come in for a CUP. I think that's what he -- don't we already have it in the ordinance that if it's within 300 feet -- a large building is within 300 feet of the residents that has to -- Canning: No, sir. Zaremba: I'm imagining that. Okay. Canning: No sir. De Weerd: That's public noticing. Zaremba: Well, I know that, but there were some other things, like speakers and outdoor events and I thought large buildings that we had made 300 feet as well, so -- okay. I was wrong about that. Nickel: And, again, just to elaborate on this plan a little bit, we -- we really can accomplish this with the -- with the concept plan we have now and the conditions we have built in and that was the reason for the flexibility. I don't think this is too much out of line with our original concept plan. And so I think by -- by having those specific conditions that will address, though -- and it was really a compatibility concern with staff, more than anything else. I think they would have given us a lot more flexibility if this was industrial or commercial to this -- to the side. But, again, we are trying to protect existing uses, which I don't disagree with one bit, so I think most of this can probably be ,, .'~, t~~ °;: ~; (~',' !,.' ,. a ' ~ F~- ~'~ 6 i! ~,` '' ~' ~,. F ~; ~s t,: tr Meridian City Council ~ O June 17, 2008 Page 19 of 55 accomplished just with the modification to the development agreement and, then, modification to the plat at some point. Zaremba: Thank you. Nickel: Thanks. De Weerd: Well, frankly, I know pedestrian traffic was -- was questioned with the -- the other plat. This one deals with the pedestrian a lot better than this other sea of asphalt. Did I say that? So, that one seems to deal more with the pedestrian than the other. Nickel: And, again, maybe it is -- maybe it is beneficial to have that adopted into the development agreement, so we can kind of see and understand what -- the preferred concept plan. De Weerd: Okay. Council, any further questions? Rountree: None. Canning: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes. Canning: I'm sorry. Councilmember Rountree. Rountree: Go right ahead. Canning: Okay. I had asked the applicant to address a couple other issues. One was with regard to the proposed number of cattle. He says he wants to graze cattle and I just wanted a number as to the limit of how many cattle. I didn't want this all of a sudden to become a feed lot. So, if the applicant could provide that on the record. Nickel: Yeah. Thank you. We would be happy with 25 as a number -- maximum head number for cattle. And that's based on historically what the applicant has had out there at any given time. De Weerd:. So, you have cattle out there right now? Nickel: Yes. De Weerd: Okay. You have cattle out there right now. Zaremba: Madam Mayor. That includes babies, calves, and stuff -- Nickel: Yes, it does. ~ ~F~ ~i ~ t~t~t~ ~ r tg ~~ . 1 , ~ ~. k ~~~ f E . E ji ~ y ~ ~ 3 ~ T„ }~ 7 t ~ ~(( 1 y S .~ } } ~ 3„ { 3 d'.. . j l C 't ~ ~ P ~ ~ 1 i yr . f pp ~ ~~ ~S4 y1 S '`~ . _ ~ 4 7 3~f, y 7' i 'F' ~~ ~ ~ ~. t j~ ~ M1 ~ ~ i i t'~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j~ f n ~ ~ t _ X61 l' ~ ~ ti ~~ "~r ; { } ~t .~ ~ ~~ i ~ ': ~'+ 1 ~ a~, ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~` i ~ f ~ ~ ~t ~" ' ' ,~, a s ' "s ~ ~ r>r ~ ~ ~ ! r ~ , k ~ ~ I. '+f t 'r t 7ryr ~ i 1 ! ~ ~ ~ F~ ~~ ~ ~ a ~ ' ~ ~ ~ E E E 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ) _ ~ ,~ c j, ~ i ~. ~ ~ ~ (( e ~ ~ 4 4 4 ~ E i,. f ~ i i ~ ~ ~ 5 1J1 ~ ~ ~str f 4 ~ {{ ~ F g~g 3 ~ t , ~ 1 > 7! 1 L ~rf~ ~ ~ YY Iii # i 3 a ~ ~ ` 3 , ~ y , i {I t 1 i ~"~ 3 5.. .r. , g ~ ~ e i r ! 3 ~ ' ~ ~ } 1 1. iG ffff ~ .7 { 95. a' ~ ~ _ ~ 3 t t. t ~`. i { X ~ r i -2 ~ ~ ~ .~ _ 7S '~ ` ~ F - kk ~. . Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 20 of 55 De Weerd: That's a head. Bird: What about horses? What about horses? Cattle and horses are different, so -- Nickel: So, possibly one additional horse. Or one horse. De Weerd: A one horse show. Canning: And, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, for the public that's not used to our odd naming of uses, a fuel sales facility and a vehicle washing facility are, indeed, a gas station and car wash. And, finally, I can't see this comer -- is a representative from the ACHD available to comment on the 8,000 vehicle trips? Because I'm concerned that 350,000 square feet doesn't really equate to 8,000 vehicle trips. So, if you could ask her to comment on that, I'd appreciate it. And that was all. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Rountree: Madam Mayor, I just had a comment about this concept plan. One of the issues that we talked about last time was ultimately some type of frontage road or frontage access and it seems to me that this concept lends itself pretty well to that. That -- depending on what happens here, certainly access could be brought south through here, at least into this area from this development, as opposed to having to do this. Depending on how that eventually operated, one could circumnavigate the property and get back to Waltman, so it seems to me that this concept lends itself better to that idea than the original concept. Having no scale, it's difficult to pick out the parking lot. I think it would at least handle parking lot type maneuvers through that area. De Weerd: Okay. I would imagine that traveler would like other options -- another option as well. Rountree: And deliveries could be made either that way or, you know, in a looped fashion, as opposed to in and out. At some future time. Obviously, we don't know what's going to happen with the interchange. The interchange may take that whole 15 acres. I doubt it, but it might. Anyway, just a comment. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Nickel: Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. I did have a couple of names on the sign-up sheet. I have a Curtis Lee who has signed up neutral. Lee: I'm Curtis Lee at 365 Waltman Lane. De Weerd: Thank you. is ~I S` ~ ! i* ~ f ~ y ~i fJ I I ~ i i# ~i• i ,~ ~ ~~ ( ~ ~~ I ~ { j G ~ ~, ~ ~~ ' ~ f~ y I 1 { ~ ( b` '.~ ` X 1 ~ ~l `. ~ ~ ~ .. ~ f ~ ~ 4 ~ ' { ~ i j ~'j Ij4 ~ .1 ~ I w p~g ', 4~ ~ t~' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~i X13 I I ~ ; ` ~ E ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ j ~ Fr° ~! t~` ' I 1 + " ~ r k s ~, ~ ~ € { I q I ' ~ i ~~ E 1, ~ ~ ~ * F }~ i~3 f I ~ i- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~' '~ ~ ~~ r ' S ~ ~ : i ~~ ~ ~i1 # z :l t i% ~ I ~ ~ # ~t I ~ ~ ~ F ~ S ryj ~ ~ ( A ~ ~ ~' ~-;. t~ ~': j ~+ ~ ~ i ~ r, r~ I f ¢~; €' p, i `, 1 I >: ~. ~i ~i'' i j, ~; ri - Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 21 of 55 U Lee: Before we start site improvements on this we got to make sure they do something with that bridge to the lane, because it will not handle any trucks or anything when they start doing their site improvements before they start doing their work. And the second thing is that closed-off subdivision done years ago -- I know you guys need to get it opened up, because it's unhealthy for the residents there. How it got through to begin with is beyond me. Planning and Zoning, how they got that through without another access into that closed-off subdivision. But now we are having to incur the cost and the trouble of it. That frontage road thing is never going to die, I don't think, because it's a good idea. If the Planning and Zoning, ITD and ACRD, maybe should reevaluate their 20 year non-existent plan to open up their barren land at the south side of Johnston Lane there where they are going to be doing all that work and access a frontage road, it would help -- it would stop the impact fees and fixing Waltman Lane so much. It would help the residents. And it would be better for this Browning Plaza. But why planning and zoning and ITD have a 20 year non-existent plan, they don't know what they are doing with, so nobody can tough that frontage road, is beyond me. I don't understand it. If they don't have a plan, well, maybe they should get one and reevaluate it and change it for the cost and everything else to the community. Because right now it's bare and it will probably be bare another 20 years back there. That's all. Thanks. De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Norma Haddock signed up --didn't -- Rountree: You're supposed to tum that off. De Weerd: Well, he can't read the sign. Haddock: I'm Nona Haddock at 480 Waltman Lane. I'd like a little more discussion about what is going to happen to Waltman. Obviously, things are moving forward and the things we brought before are nonexistent at this point. So, he mentioned that the intersection would be at a certain point, but, then, really need to address how it's going to connect to where the Waltman group is going to start at the ditch do their improvement. So, what's this road going to look like that's going to handle the traffic? How wide are we talking? What's going to happen? And it really impacts the Lees and the neighbors up there, because, obviously, it's going to go into their property and that's not been discussed. I'd like a little better information for us about what that really is entailing. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Is there additional testimony that would like to -- yes, ma'am. Aldridge: Yeah. I'm Donna Aldridge. I live at 365 Waltman Lane, courtesy of my son. Anyway, I have lived down there, like I said, for over 40 years. I don't mind development coming in, but I think they are not doing it right. Now, on Waltman Lane it is a dead end road. It's not even a road. It's a lane. And we can't even hardly get out of there right now and if they put all this traffic and all these buildings, what are we going to do? One time, like I said, when they opened that lane up and let those people through, I couldn't Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 22 of 55 even get out of my driveway. We had to have police there and I just don't see that this is going to work, unless they put a frontage road or do something better and -- instead of trying to take a lane and make a road out of it and put all these people down that one road. It ain't going to work. De Weerd: Thank you, ma'am. Okay. Swenson: Mike Swenson. 815 Waltman Lane. I'm still having a disconnect on the traffic issues. They actually put the -- the counter thing on our road and somehow, you know, and I have no idea how we got this many people, but they -- for just Waltman Lane alone, they counted 500 trips, you know, and that seemed amazing to me. And, you know, I don't have really a good feel as to how many cars are actually going to be coming down that lane. I mean as somebody else spoke through the subdivision through our lane and they weren't really expecting -- you know, what I think I need is some sort of projection as to how many are going to come through there and, you know, I think it going to be a higher percentage than what they think. But, of course, greater minds than mine are thinking about this. But there seems to be something that just isn't quite making sense to me. De Weerd: Thank you. Additional testimony? N.Swenson: Nancy Swenson. 815 Waltman Lane. De Weerd: Thank you. N.Swenson: I also have some concerns about the number of people that are going to be coming down. When we are talking 8,000 people, are we talking that just to try and come into here or if there is another property over here that we are not looking at, that I have seen signs up that is waiting to have somebody come in and develop it. If we have 8,000 people coming down here, does that mean these guys get none? What is the -- what is the amount that this road is supposed to hold. In the future we could be looking very easily at this other development coming in here wanting to have traffic, what is that intersection, even under the -- it would be some place over here, I imagine, according to the scale, how many vehicles are going to be coming through that intersection trying to get to this development, which right now only has signs up saying that it's available and for this proposed, are they going to have to say you can have 8,000 today and you can have 8,000 tomorrow? I'm not seeing it myself, because that intersection is only going to hold a certain amount of vehicles if they develop and he doesn't have his road in, is that going to change things? What sort of future plan are we going to look? Are we going to try and integrate this with this that is still up? Is there a long range plan for what it's going to look like? Or is it going to be put together like a cast off and second-hand ideas? I know that I'm not going to stop progress, but I'd like to have a unified plan and specifically would like to know whether I'm going to be able to get off of my section of the road, but -- but that seems to be something still under consideration. So, at least for tonight, please, think about it. • Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 23 of 55 De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Any additional testimony? Yes. Christie. Little: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Christie Little, Ada County Highway District, 3775 North Adams Street in Garden City. I'm here tonight just to put on the record a little more information from the highway district and answer your questions as well. Your first question had to do with trip generation and the trip generation that was used with the traffic impact study that the applicant submitted included 200,000 square feet of shopping center and 150,000 square feet of office park. The shopping center classification generally is 43 trips per thousand square feet and so their overall total, using those classifications, was 10,300, which there is a little bit of confusion as far as the applicant's 350,000 square feet number, because that's the total showing here. So, it might end up being the types of uses and how we look at that. But regardless, the highway district did put the 8,000 trips generated by the site on this development and accounted for it -- the approximate 500 that are existing there today. The forecast ADT that we like to keep on collector roads is 8,500 trips a day. That's why we established the 8,000 trip limit. In the highway district action, however, there is a note to the city that I'd just like to read to you in case you haven't seen it. It addresses some of the concerns of the neighbors. It's just reminding the city that the issuance of building permits could generate traffic beyond capacity along Waltman Lane until the extension of Corporate Drive and just pointing out that we have suggested limiting the site to 8,000 vehicle trips per day, but this, essentially, restricts any further development whose parcels only have full access onto Waltman Lane until the extension of Corporate Drive is complete. So, basically, what we are saying is these 8,000 vehicle trips that we are suggesting be the cap for this development, if an adjacent parcel comes in for development prior to corporate being extended, there won't be any capacity for them. So, at that point ACHD would recommend denial, because all the capacity had been used up until such time that Corporate was extended. And, then, just to clarify, again, for the neighbors, the applicant is going to be constructing Waltman Lane from Corporate to Ten Mile Creek as a three lane collector street section, three lanes, bike lanes, vertical curb, gutter, and sidewalk, for a portion of that and, then, with the phrasing plan at 8,000 and as Mr. Nickel stated, some of those improvements on specifically the extension of Corporate Drive, the highway district would support the formation of an extra ordinary impact fee overlay district for those improvements. De Weerd: Thank you. Rountree: Madam Mayor. Christie, I asked Shawn about the traffic projections and what you're telling me is the traffic projections are based on 43 vehicle trips per thousand square feet of commercial or office, but what specifically was taken into consideration for Mallard Landing Subdivision, which would access through this area? It seems to me that that number would be significantly higher. Little: Madam Mayor, Councilmember Rountree, the trips coming and going into that subdivision are accounted for in the traffic impact study and often what we see with those stub streets is a wash, meaning the trips that are going into the new site are the Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 24 of 55 same number of trips going out of the site. So, they did evaluate that and that was taken into consideration. Rountree: So, that traffic generated there is also part of the 8,000? Little: Correct. Rountree: And, then, we heard some different numbers, but you're saying the 8,000 is based on 350,000 square feet? Little: No. Rountree: As opposed to 450,0000 square feet? Little: Actually, based on that traffic impact study, a 200,000 square foot shopping center would generate almost 8,600. So, it's just -- they have used two different classifications in their impact study. One's a shopping center. Part of it's an office park. Quite frankly, we don't subdivide up bits and portions of subdivisions. So, I'd refer to this as a shopping center and that is 43 trips per thousand square feet. Rountree: And, then, my last question for you -- what's the capacity -- what's the design capacity of the split corridor intersection improvement? Little: That's not a fair question. Rountree: It is, too. You're supposed to know that stuff. Little: Maybe if you give me a couple minutes I can look up -- Rountree: I certainly would. De Weerd: I guess, Christie, you mentioned that improvement between the creek and the Waltman intersection is a three lane collector and we are talking about the traffic from Mallard's Landing, as well as what is generated here, what is the long-term plan for Waltman Lane, as was mentioned the land to the east of that is also commercial or mixed use. What is Waltman Lane going to be. It must be more than a three lane collector. Little: Madam Mayor, I don't believe -- and Anna can correct me. I don't believe the city has proposed or recognized it as anything more than a collector in the Comprehensive Plan. I don't think it shows up as an arterial in the functional classification map either, so -- De Weerd: I guess my question may be more towards Anna. With the kind of land use designation in that area, is a three lane collector appropriate to carry this kind of traffic? + i ~ ~ i I ,~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~t ~T , k ~ r :' t ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ . ~ ~ ~ ? ~ i y ~ ~ ~ I ~' f ~ ~ ~ .: i ~ ~, . ~ ~ ~;, ~~ Ex F. E ~ e ' ,) .~ E ~% ; ~ . ~ ~: ~. @, E. ~ , 4 P 3 ,: ~ ~' ~ ? f. ~ 9 i . ' k t ~ F; 1 ~ f ~ ~ i t Meridian City Council ~ • June 17, 2008 Page 25 of 55 Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, if you look at the -- I wish I had a larger picture. This one gets to it a little bit. If you envision the parking -- or the land uses on the east side of Waltman, there is a much larger area there with just a two lane road, just a local road, and it's a much larger commercial area. So, I don't believe that the limited amount of area here on the south side of Waltman -- and even on the north side of Waltman, I don't think it's going to generate the need for an arterial roadway at that location. If you think about our other collectors that have changed to arterials, it was Pine -- and you think about all the area feeding into Pine compared to this one, I think that a collector is sufFcient. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: Just to confirm -- you were expressing a comfort level of -- well, the terms the applicant is putting in is what percentage of their square footage can be built before Corporate has to be put through. They are proposing a total of over 400,000 square feet and not -- not proposing to make Corporate go until they are at least three-quarters built out at that. It sounds like your figures add up to something closer to 35 -- 350,000 square feet for the entire 8,000 vehicle trips. So, my question is if we go that direction, should we be suggesting to the applicant that somewhere around 200,000 square feet they need to complete Corporate? Little: Madam Mayor, Councilmember Zaremba, that's correct, I mean just based on their traffic impact study, 200,000 square feet of shopping center is 8,600 trips per day. So, it's less than 200,000. Part of the confusion is that the applicant's using square footage, the highway district is looking at trips, and I don't have my calculator here to divide 8,000 by 43. De Weerd: Well, we will let you go and calculate that and, then, level of service over here. Canning: It's 186,000. Little: Thanks. Zaremba: Thank you. De Weerd: Thanks. Okay. Any further testimony from the public? I'm sorry, you have to come up and reintroduce yourself. Aldridge: I'm Donna Aldridge at 365 Waltman Lane. Now, I'm still concerned about Waltman Lane. If they do make it -- widen the road, what the people's going to do down there, they are going to be taking my well, my yard, and everything if they widen that road. On the one side is a storage and, then, the residents on the other side and, like I said, it's just a lane now. It's not even a road. It's a dead end. lane. So, I have been - ~ f' , ~ ~; y ~ , ~ ,. ~ ~, ; ~ ~ a ~ ~ $ ~ ,~ i ~. ~ ~ 3 i ~ ? z ~. _ s ~ ~, {~ 7~ {{77 S F i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~` G ~} ` '~ ~i~ k {. il. ~l ~y{~ - ~ ~ ~ i j ` i fps. Y 1' ~ ~ C, ~„ f ~ ~. i iii p ~~ [ ~ ~ .~~ j ~. I ~s< ~ i. i Q ~ f~x~` y ~ } ' ~ t- ~ ' ! ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ i a ~ ~I p ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ - I i t ~ ~ _ ~ k sT f t ' i i i ~y ` ~~ ~' . ~ ~,~ -~ ~ ~ f :~i' r ,~ , ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ C + ~( I~ ~ r '' ~' ~ ~ i ~ 11i E F ~ } F ~ ~ ` 1 Y{ a =7* ' { ~ ' T ~ { I 9 // k i i t f e , i # ~ { ii ~" it N i I M ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ' it ~. !r1 ~ ` x .irk ~~ ! r~ ; t , , ~ . I Meridian City Council • June 17, 2008 Page 26 of 55 ~J down there, like I said, 40 years, I have got a lot of memories, I have got trees and flowers and my place looking like a Garden of Eden almost. So, now they are going to come in and just tear everything out to put in this development for other people to come down our road and -- I'm confused. I'm just -- like I said, I have got a lot of memories there and I lost my youngest son and there is a lot of memories there for me. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Would the applicant like to have his wrap-up remarks? Nickel: Thanks again. Shawn Nickel. To address one of the questions, the bridge over the creek is our responsibility as part of our development. This bridge right here will be part of our reconstruction of Waltman in our project. As ACRD has indicated, that number, Councilmember Rountree, you're looking for was 500 vehicle trips coming out the Landing. That was taken out of the 8,500 vehicle trips that -- that Waltman could handle. So, that's where the 8,000 came from was the 85 minus the 500 coming out of the Landing already existing. Actually, the -- yeah. That's right. So, I guess the confusion is over the breakdown of square footage versus vehicle trips per day coming out of that -- coming out of this development and, again, not knowing what those -- what those uses are going to be, it might be better just to keep at the 8,000 vehicle trips per day condition that ACHD has in there -- in their approval and through the phasing plan that they are recommending that we -- that we provide them, work with on when that threshold is met, unless we can -- I guess unless we can come up with a square footage that -- that makes -- that makes some sense. And, again, I guess regarding the frontage road, once again, not -- not -- not knowing -- not knowing what is going to happen with ITD's property with -- with this interchange and with all these properties right here, how they are going to develop, it really doesn't give us any control over when that frontage road is going to continue and what it actually is going to accomplish. If it loops down here, at some point it's going to have to come back up to Waltman, because I doubt we are going to get another access point on Meridian Road. I just don't know in this small area what that really is going to do to have a frontage road and also we have no control over it this way and we have designed -- we have control to some point over where Corporate is going to go. So, any other questions, I'll stand for those right now. De Weerd: Council, questions? Bird: I have none. Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes. Rountree: I guess I want to -- I want to be clear what you're saying in terms of conditions. For what development -- or what conditions might be put on the development, if, in fact, we were to move forward with this. We heard that something on the order of 190,000 square feet, as opposed to the 350,000 square feet that you originally proposed in your testimony, would be all that -- that 8,000 vehicle trips could Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 27 of 55 accommodate. Would you go on to clarify your previous statement about volumes and square footages, for the record? Nickel: As far as which we'd prefer to do? Rountree: I know what you would prefer to do, but what -- Nickel: I mean which -- which -- which threshold we want to -- whether it's the vehicle trips or the square footage? Is that what you're asking? I don't know what -- Rountree: Well, it seems to me that one's going to beget the other and it's -- in reality, it's easier to control square footage than it is traffic volumes, because, quite honestly, I don't believe the 8,000 vehicle trips a day and the 500 coming out of Mallard Landing. I would say that whole lower quadrant is going to come out of there and if you multiply the number of lots by ten vehicle trips a day, which is the rule of thumb for traffic generation, there is going to be a lot of traffic that goes through there, in addition to what you're talking about, so the -- Nickel: I guess if we had our -- we had our way about it -- you're going to have to determine with ACRD what -- what that -- what that square footage maximum needs to be. I mean we would -- I guess we would be more comfortable with establishing that number knowing that -- and from what ACRD is recommending, that it's understood that this property was going to be taking that -- that square footage or those vehicle trips -- I think that's one thing that the neighbors were concerned about is are you -- you know, what -- how are you going to define this intersection and take into account this is all commercial designated property that's going to have an higher impact on that intersection. But I guess we would like it clear in the condition that that threshold is for this property, as proposed or recommended by ACHD. So, I don't know if I answered your question, Mr. Rountree, but, obviously, the larger amount of square footage the better we are going to like it. Rountree: That's all I have, Madam Mayor. De Weerd: Okay. I think also at our last meeting there was a question about the masonry wall and the height. Nickel: Right. That -- Madam Mayor, that -- that exhibit that we are including with the development agreement shows that as a six foot high sound wall behind a three foot landscape berm. De Weerd: Behind the three foot berm? Nickel: With the evergreen. De Weerd: Oh, there you go. And where all does that go? ,,, t ~ ~ ~ ~ ; a' , I ~ a ~ t, . t ~ ~ , I! t I ykt , ~ t t t{ ~, ~~~~ t 1 f ~i 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~'. ~;: ~, i , I ~ f ~ S, ' i I; 6 j ~ }t~ r, t i ~ 't :. Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 28 of 55 Nickel: That would be on the westem boundary of the property. De Weerd: And did you address what went in that -- that comer? I think that question was asked and I don't remember what the answer was. Nickel: As far as buffering or -- De Weerd: Uh-huh. Buffering. Nickel: Yeah. I think we looked at this boundary to here as the westem boundary. De Weerd: Okay. Nickel: That's to protect these homes right here. De Weerd: Council, do you have additional questions? Bird: I have none. De Weerd: Anna, regarding the plat, I guess they -- they keep the integrity of the road system, but I like the altemative -- Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I think part of the applicant's desire for having the altemative concept plan up tonight was to see your reaction and I think he's gotten a pretty good feel that you all like that one better. As far as from the preliminary to the final plat, if the connections to all the adjoining properties are still met, I would not -- I would be able to deem this -- the concept plan as conforming to the approved preliminary plan. As long as the relationship to the -- to the surrounding properties and the street remains the same. That's the kind of concepts we see frequently and I would not be concerned with that. You know, the details on the plan aren't there. So, it's hard to make a definitive statement about it, but it sure looks like we could accommodate it. I was more concerned with the relocation of the big box and specifically having an opportunity to contact those neighbors about the change, because they have not been present at many of the hearings. De Weerd: Well -- and I would say even as far as that big box goes -- we have a fire in our garbage can out there. I just thought Iwould -- Bird: Where is our fireman at? Rountree: Mark, you can handle that? Bird: Mark can -- well, I don't think so. Put aBand-aid on it, Mark. De Weerd: I didn't want to overreact or anything. i ~ ~ l .~ ~ ~ ~ 4 r t i t , l f ~ ~ f ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y , t. ~ i ~~ A ~# S ~ Z ~-{ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ d I 1 ~ ~~ S _ ~ k ! ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ r ~~t ~ ~ ~ ; °I ~ ~' ~ ~ ,P i ! ~ ~~, ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ f 1`i ~ ,SFr z ~~ dti ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ } - tf ; ~ ~° _ ~ r a ` e ~- 5 l~ i f' ft ~ ~ } i r ' i ' ~ ~ i ~ ' ~ E f ~C~ f ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ $ ~~ ~ i ' P , , , ~ , r ~ l ' i Y ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ 1 . f ~ ~ ~ ~ f } ~ 1 1.~ ~ ~ ~ s~~ ~ r x 1 ` = ~ ~C;a E ~,: e ~ '~ '~ ]~ ~' 1 E~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ e IE ~ ~ G F{'~ ~ i~ _ s 1;~ p ~ t ' r~ t f t ~ ~ ~ ~ ' t ~ ~~ ~ ~ I +~; ~ I *} ~ F ~ ~~' ~ ~ f ~ 1 ~p 1., ~ } 7 j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ' ~~ ~ r ~~. F } _~ III} i ~ t ~~z ; ~' I; i : '~~ 4 ~t~ S j 3 i i ~} ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 29 of 55 Rountree: We hope that's all it is. • Nickel: Sorry. I was just going to use that tactic if I really needed it. De Weerd: Well -- but I a sensitive to what Anna was saying, because that is the one thing about the concept pl n that I wouldn't want to see. I would want to see the smaller footprint over near the resi ential. So, I would almost swap the one in the east comer to -- to the one in the west. And I guess that's in keeping with -- with your comment as well. Canning: Yes, Madam Mayor, but I don't think they could fit the big one over there, but I'm sure they will -- De Weerd: Well, we won't ask Shawn to redesign it, since he's -- Canning: I'm sure they wills take your guidance. De Weerd: We do like the developer's idea better.. And let me just go back to -- I think some of the discussion at he last meeting was the disconnect with the pedestrians and with -- with this other plan nd wouldn't want to get that lost in the big picture of things. Zaremba: Madam Mayor. On that subject, I expressed enthusiasm for the alternate concept plan. I was not ne essarily meaning the buildings. I like the roadway design. think we do need to have rotection for the residential neighbors to the west regarding the building, but my enthus asm is for the roadway design. De Weerd: And the pedestrian connectivity. Zaremba: Yes. De Weerd: I don't know w~at direction Council is going with this, but I do want at least those comments noted. Nickel: Madam Mayor, I think we can definitely work toward wording in the development agreement t at this plan is more oriented towards pedestrian, as an example, in alternative co cept number two or something like that. That way you're going to get -- kind of get t e best of both worlds in your -- in the plan that you ultimately get. De Weerd: And since our into afirefighter -- Zaremba: We do still have De Weerd: Way to go, Mr. Vary. ~!) 's~' !!j ~h I ~n-: 1{1Y: I~ '~~ ~{ i ~~ ~ki~~ '~, ~I~11 'Ef j ~ ;i~.. _ ~ i ~, !t C 1 '~ fle attorney is not over there taking diligent notes, he's turned firefighters. ! 4 i 1j4 t~ _ ~: ~ t t 1. [ I I I ~ ~ 1. ~ I J , ).. I ~ ,i ~ Lr ~ ~ ~. , ~ ~; ' ` ! !j 1.. # ~: 1, ~ . ~ 1. _ `':. f ~ ~ ` fff~ _ i 1 ~I ~ i I I ~i, ! t j ~~; N Meridian City Council • June 17, 2008 Page 30 of 55 Nary: Deputy Chief Niem yer took care of it. De Weerd: So, I guess if~hat's noted. And that's only if Council goes positive on this. Okay. Any other question ,comments, from Council? Hearing none -- Rountree: Madam Mayor just a parting comment here as I -- I did some quick math and that's dangerous. I id a quick count of the lots that I thought one could easily guess are going to utilize this road in Mallard's Landing. I would say that the traffic volume that could be gen rated by any development on this parcel at this point in time would meet the 8,000 trip that ACRD set as a limit, would be -- would end up with a square footage of somethi g on the order of 150 to 158 thousand square feet. I am not privy of the traffic analysis, but I do not believe the 500 vehicle counts on Waltman Lane itself take into account ny of that traffic that would be generated from that -- somewhere between 100 nd 125 lots. De Weerd: All right. I'm But Waltman Lane happy Rountree: Anyway, just a Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yeah. Mr Zaremba: I agree with w earlier, which was as far a be easier -- it would be e administer by traffic count, day, whereas picking a nur Nickel: Madam Mayor, if moment? De Weerd: Yes. If you will; Moore: Certainly. Dave M~ Road, Lake Oswego, Oreg. a different perspective to tf' because, quite frankly, I ha' city or any municipal agent feet, what you have effecti~ of Ruddy as a public drive, And I can safely tell you development that could sub some reality of what the tra fair to burden this project ~n ~ry, ma'am -- okay. Gloria, you can't just shout out anything. to be just right off I-84 off of Meridian Road. ent. I don't know if Shawn wants to address that or not. ba. ~t I think one of the premises Councilman Rountree had administrating when we get to the point, it would probably pier to administer if we used building square footage. To CHD would have to leave a counter there to check it every per for the square footage, we know when that happens. the record is still open, could the developer speak for a please, state your name and address for the record. yore. Cooney & Crew Company. 4949 Southwest Meadows gyn. Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I'd like to bring e discussion, if I could. Not to argue with any of the math, re never been able to get away with my quick math with any y. But to limit traffic counts on a 38 acre parcel to 150,000 ely done is burdened about ten acres with the improvement the extension Corporate, and the improvement of Waltman. as a developer for 20 years, there is not a ten acre port that. So, yes, there is some signs here. Yes, there is rfic generation might be. But I also think it's not necessarily ith the development of Ruddy Road and, then, count those Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 31 of 55 traffic counts against the K I just wanted to bring that to work with ACHD and si that allows 38 acres to h. support the improvements Rountree: Thank you. I Bird: What is the square • ject. It is the reality, but it's also financially unfeasible. So, . I'm just the developer. That needs to be -- we are happy and Council to try to come to some common ground here ;enough development to happen to be able to financially ~t are being requested of us. Thank you. that and I understand that. then? Moore: I don't know. Sim le math will tell you that in a dense, in-fill division, we try to have about 25 percent c verage. So, in other words, if you have about 25 percent coverage on 38 acres, that s about 400 to 425 thousand square feet. Bird: Four hundred thousa Moore: Correct. And, age to base the -- the go forwa love if a large office user c. allow many more square 1 keep this as a mixed use ~ solution, I'm just trying to g De Weerd: Any q Zaremba: Thank you. Moore: Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Ok Bird: I don't, Madam Mayor Rountree: I don't need any. square feet? semantics, whether it's an office -- I mean if -- if we were plan on square footage, I'm sure the city or all of us would e and wanted to do a very nice office park here. That may t than say just pure retail. So, we'd like the flexibility to relopment and, again, I'm not up here trying to give you a you another perspective. Any other questions for me? Council, any further information needed? De Weerd: Okay. Staff, ar>ly final comments? Council? Rountree: Madam Mayor, guess Mr. Moore made the point I was going to make, that in order for this to work, th y have to have a certain square footage in order to pay for the infrastructure. Essenti Ily, what he said at ultimate build out they are going to need between 400 and 450 thou and square feet to pay for the infrastructure they are talking about improving. There is o budget in ACHD to improve Waltman or the split corridor above and beyond what mi ht need to be, based on the development -- the use of the development to the west - from the west, so who is going to pay for the traffic that's going to utilize this facility nd cause it to not work so well at build out? I just see that this is -- this is a concept - well, I like the concept, no problem with that. I like the 3 ~ ~ i ~ ~ lt ~ ~~ ~ i S ' # ~t ~ " ~ ~ P a h h ~ i Ej ~ i~Wa ~ jti ~ ~... ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~' ~ ~ ~. F ' ' ~~ i~ ~ a -`~ y: ~ # ~ f ~ i- ~~ ~~ i ~ i ~. ;. ~ ~ 4 ~. ~I ~y i-; 3 1 ~ ' i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ r III ' v , i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ", a, i F ~'~+~ I ' ~ ~ ;) r: ~ g ~ ~ j , ~, ~ ~ ~6 ~ ~ r:~~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~t ~p N _ ~ ,,f~ .. 1. ~ ~' E ~' ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~ 3 i ~ ' a ~~ 1; ~! i s 3 ~ d A i : g 4 ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~:~ i ~ ~~ ; r ~~i ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~. 9 ~ ! ~ ~2 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ j~ r ~ Y ~ ~~; t >t ~~ ~~ ~ f ii ~ ~ f r r L' i ~ ~~ ~ ~ r ~ 1 F. ~ ~ tll, i ~~ . [~~ ~ ~ t~ 1~ f. . ~ Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 32 of 55 concept. I think it's just b~ and Ruddy were in there, what's -- what's to the eas have a number of ingress and we will only have one were to approve it and no or Ruddy. So, if we were ever get all the improvemE infrastructure and the abilii De Weerd: Christie, did Little: Thank you, Madam fore -- way before the infrastructure's in place. If Corporate would -- I would agree with Anna it's not too different than in terms of the Corporate development over there. But they nd egress points in that. At this point we will only have one at whatever level we would approve development to if we uarantee to the developer that we would ever get Corporate o limit it to say 150 to 200 thousand square feet, would we rlts on Waltman even? I'm just struggling with the impact on to pay for the infrastructure. have the final information on the Waltman intersection? r. De Weerd: You thought w~ almost forgot, uh? Little: Yeah. Madam May r, Council President Rountree, Pat Dolby did take a look at the intersection using the xisting conditions -- one with Corporate and one without the Corporate connection. So without is today and the intersection operates at a level of service E and with the Co orate Drive extension it's projected to operate at a level of service D. And, then, with the improvement of the intersection that will occur next year, it looked like it was an E-D usng the p.m. peak hour. Rountree: And what kind Little: That was just using Rountree: And what were Little: Which numbers are projections did he -- 2010 forecast. ? u looking for? Rountree: The numbers or~ Waltman and Corporate. Little: Madam Mayor, Co ncilmember Rountree, those weren't provided to us in the calculation of the intersec ion of Main and Meridian, as far as -- you're looking for volumes on those two road avs? Rountree: Yeah. What d d you design it to? You're going to rebuild it, you had to design it to some traffic vol me. Are they not in the split comdor? Little: I guess I don't unde De Weerd: The question Corporate, what is that int is supposed to cant'? E, ~ ~ n `; ~I, s ~ S ~ C i~ ~~~. :~ ~a'. b: i '~ t ~ ~~' PPP ~ ~i t~ `~ your question. in phase one of that intersection at Waltman -Meridian - ection -- what are the traffic numbers that that intersection i t i. i ~! ~: ~; 1; ~ ~ a~ , .t~` I t~i a~ ~ ~ . iI i, } ~ I ~~ $;, t: } ,, q; fi~'; F. ~' a `. Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 33 of 55 Little: Madam Mayor, Pre ident Rountree, I don't know that answer and, of course, all of that would have gone th ough the study that was done on the intersection corridor on what was use to project nd forecast how many vehicle trips per day that is, but when -- when that s udy was goi g on and with any intersection or corridor study we are using the Compass forecast, whi his what the CIP or Capital Improvement Plan is based on. Rountree: Okay. Thank De Weerd: Do you have numbers that we don't have? Nickel: No. I have a tom ent. Madam Mayor and Councilmember Rountree -- I guess all Council Members -- an this might sound kind of crazy, but hear me out. It seems like the -- one of the conc ms which is decreasing the square footage of the -- of the development is the tonne tion to Landing. As the developer's indicated, this property right here and this grope owner is taking on quite the burden to fix a problem and get traffic out of this developm nt and bring it onto Waltman, so -- Rountree: I agree. Nickel: Why don't we not connect this at this time until Corporate Drive is extended, because what you're goin to have is -- a couple things are going to happen. You're going to deny the project a d this connection's never going to happen. You're going to put the square footage so ow that this development is never going to happen and this connection is never going t occur. So, why -- why even connect it right now? Can we build in a condition that tha 's to be connected when the Corporate Drive is and come up with a reasonable square ootage that doesn't burden Waltman and provides enough square footage that this pr ject actually does work. Now, we would definitely put in -- we would definitely put in - we would definitely put in the emergency access, so you would at least have that -- t at service available, but just wanted to kind of bring that up, because that seems like t at's -- to accommodate that is bringing the project down to accommodate that -- that dditional traffic. So, I just wanted to comment that we are also not in disagreement t postpone this if you need any additional traffic numbers or we need to discuss it furthe . So, thank you for that additional time. De Weerd: Anna, do you that number? Bird: No. Canning: For the De Weerd: Uh-huh. Canning: I was looking on there is a copy of our split c~ ve any idea where -- I can't -- would Compass have that -- n, ma'am? ACHD site -- if Christie knows. Is it on -- do you know if for plan on your site? ~, ~~ 4 ' ~ k ~ ~ ~ E[ ~ 1 s 4 ~ ~ ~ p ~ .i F~ '3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ i. ~. .~ ~ { Sf ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ i ° ~. ~ ~`i : f~ s ~ EE d ~ ~ ~~ it E ~ ~' ~ G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ r t~ ~ h ~ . , ~ ~ ~ ~ `~' r , €. D ~ ~ ! ~' t o ~ , i ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~~ ~~. ~ ~ 4r. ~ ~ `, ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ `~ i j ~; 1; t; ' ~ d j ~~ 1 1 rp ~, a ~= ~ . l 1 ~ ~ f ` e F p ~ ~ j li „ r ~ !! i ~ ~ i j~• ~ ~ ~ ~ i; , ~ ~ ~ i E, t ~~' ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ I ~'~ E~ M I ~ ~ } ~ ~ I ~ ~. ~:i f ~ Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 34 of 55 Little: Madam Mayor, therE are not something I use or I'm more than happy to gel been going on a long time, Bird: We have been told a Little: I did just, while I'm decision tonight, that not r now would require this apl they did require that conne to let the applicant know the Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I was just going back has been designed to han too, have a problem with tri token I understand the dE building, there is no sense going to pay for the infrastr we got to think about as we is not. And I apologize for not having those numbers. They ~ a daily basis for a particular intersection, but if you defer it, those answers for you as soon as possible. That study has so I know they were updated with each -- hundred times what they are and I can't remember. up here, want to mention if the Council decides to make a equiring the extension of the stub street from Mallard right ~lication to go back before the ACHD commission, because ~tion right now. So, if your action is something different, just ~t this will go back to the highway district for review. and remembering a little bit, I'm positive that the intersection ile traffic for build out throughout that area there, but I -- I, ~s on the road as it is until Corporate's there, but in the same veloper -- I mean if you give him 150,000 square feet of ;ven going out there and starting, that it's going to -- that isn't acture he's got to put in for that. I don't know. It's a decision make it. De Weerd: Well, Council, efore I ask -- if you want to close the Public Hearing, if you want the additional traffic umbers, I would certainly encourage you to continue this or -- Rountree: Madam Mayor, De Weerd: I would let you. Rountree: I would move tf' the applicant to provide u: hearing kind of a preferer volumes on the connection Lane. The traffic volume designed intersection with sections in your developme to extraordinary impact fee fees could be used to mal made at the objections of additional right of way req~ that information I believe I c me put an end to this, if you will let me. at we continue the Public Hearing on this item and request traffic information on this particular project and since I'm ce on concept, the redone concept, re-look at the traffic with Mallard Landing through your development to Waltman on the connection with the split comdor and the new Waltman Lane, provide us what are the proposed typical nt and on Waltman Lane that would be developed pursuant and answering the question whether or not extraordinary ;e those improvements and could those improvements be :he individual property owners who might be involved with irements. If, in fact, right of way would be required. With Auld render some sort of a decision. Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 35 of 55 De Weerd: Okay. That Rountree: That's was a Zaremba: Do we want to De Weerd: You can't d Zaremba: I'll second that Rountree: Oh, we need me. n a motion. gyn. :,uss how long -- it until I have a second. tion. effective -- I need to continue it to a date certain. Excuse Zaremba: We need a datelto continue it to. Rountree: If you want to se De Weerd: Do you want to Rountree: June 24th. Zaremba: The 24th is the t Rountree: So, my motion Zaremba: Second agrees. De Weerd: Okay. Discuss Zaremba: Councilman it and, then, discuss it, I'll find you a date. second it for discussion? I think we are fine on the 24th. ng of the ACHD conference. be to continue this hearing until June 24th, 2008. Did you have discussion, Mr. Zaremba? said everything I would discuss. De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second to continue this until the 24th. All those in favor say aye. All yes. Motion carves. MOTION CARRIED: THR E AYES. ONE ABSENT. De Weerd: Is staff clear on~the information that is desired by Council? Canning: Yes, Madam Ma over it, because we won't n on the revised concept witr Volumes on Waltman near typical sections pursuant to fees and you want some ~ object to the right of way tat for, I believe so. Just -- I guess I should be -- I better go ;cessarily have the minutes, so -- provide traffic information specific regard to volumes coming out of Mallard Landing. the split corridor interchange -- or the split corridor. And -- that would be in place if there were extraordinary impact larification on could they be made if the property owners ss. Okay. ~~ i ~ ~ , c t~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ;r ~ ~r, ~ ~ ` r ~ ~ f }~ ~ a ~ t, ~ {j I F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 44~. i y f ~. , _ ± F ._i 55N f Q~ ~~ L 1 rte ' ','r,~ t.' .. ~- Y ~ 1 F ] t t 4 ppp ~ 0 ; ~ Rif 114 ~ + t~ ~ ~ ct r ~ ~ i ~':~ ~F ~ 4 b~r1 ' ~t ~ i ~ d } ii t { 4 6 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~r~r ~ 1 °~ ~ f f.~' ~ ` r~? ;( i 4 lye ~ r ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~k st^ t~, ~ ~ ~ i ~} ;. i ~ 'p _ ~~ ~ G ~z z~' ( i~~ ~ ~~ J y+ I ~ $ f r E f: ~ 1 s ` ~ }i. I ~ ~ ~ 1 7 t ~ ~!~ ~~ i. ~ 1 ~~ t ~ ~ ~ p Y~' i 9t I ~ ~~ , F ({ ft ~II 1~~, r..3 i i. l t } N OFF ~ ~ ~ i ` I 3 ~ i ~1 ~ ~ I. 4,~ a ~ i ~! R ' e !f ~ F ~+~ i t t~ ~ f t ~ ° ~ i a~I e p ' ~ o~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ t ~ r ~ i ; ,'* ~' a ~~ ~ qq ~ L 1 ~t ~~ [ j '~~ ~` f a~ j: ~ , 1, i ~ ~~ ~.. i ,;~ ~ 4 ~ t ~n y~~r }4 ! f~ - ~[~ 4 9~ ~ Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 36 of 55 Zaremba: Madam Mayor, De Weerd: We will take a (Recess.) f~ uld a five minute break be appropriate? minute break. Item 10: Continued P blic Hearing from June 3, 2008: ZOA 08-001 Request for a Zoning Ord Hance /Unified Development Code (UDC) Text Amendment to modify, cl an up and add specific sections to the UDC (see application for details f all sections proposed for amendments) for Unified Develo men Code Text Amendment #4 by the City of Meridian Planning Dep rtment: De Weerd: Okay. Couns on Item No. 10, which is a Canning: Madam Mayor, P recommended changes, so then, I will address the onE talked about this last and th requested at your last heari the landscaping standards i adjoining any drive aisle is Morrow, Brad Miller, Come at that meeting we came t exempt truck maneuvering things that you will consider are. The five foot IandscaK for the required vehicle par be any vehicle parking are them. It would just be area like that. With regard to screening of outdoor storag an industrial district. So, ev in an industrial district and not be required. And they agreement on these items. comment on it now if you ~ allow them to use chain link link with slats looks worse t not in favor of requiring sc enough nods there that I'll required along property ling looking into the landscape t and I know the Comprehen, them on that until I do son I will go ahead and call this meeting back to order. We are ntinued Public Hearing from June 3rd on the UDC. Anna. Members of the Council, at the last hearing I reviewed a few they are on my crib notes today, just for your reference, but, thing you kind of charged me with since -- since we have at was landscaping and screening in industrial districts. You ng that I conduct a meeting with interested parties to discuss n industrial districts, in particular the five foot landscape strip how it's currently written. I met with Ron Van Auker, Walt II Larson and Councilmember Bird on June 12th, 2008, and ~ the following plan of action. I will draft new language to areas from five foot landscape plan -- and these are all just in the future, but I'm just telling you what my responsibilities ~e buffer would still be required along drive aisles and stalls cing areas, so any vehicle parking areas -- actually, it would as, would still have our standard landscape strip adjoining ~s where just trucks are going and loading docks and things screening, I am to draft modifications that do not require areas if they are within an industrial district and they adjoin en though they may be visible from a public road, if they are only visible from the industrial district, the screening would all seem to be okay with that. So, I think we came to an The other option to not allowing screening -- and you can vant, so that I can write it in there. The other option is to with slats for screening. Personally, I think over time chain han just seeing the material stored behind them. So, I was reening. That's why I went the other way. Okay. I got keep with that plan of action. So, screening would still be ;s that border non-industrial districts. I also committed to uffer and screening requirements along the railroad corridor give Plan has language in it, so I didn't -- couldn't commit to ie more research and find out about that. That may be a Meridian City Council • June 17, 2008 Page 37 of 55 bigger change and mayb require a Comprehensive Plan text amendment and things like that. So, told them I would look into it. They definitely have an interest in not requiring the screening, m kes some sense given that it's a 200 foot right of way and they also didn't want the landscaping requirement. The problem is it's shown as a pathway on all our pathw y plans. So, that's the issue there. And, then, the other issues -- we already talke about. We talked about gated developments already. I'll bring that in a separate to amendment, as with the landscaping in industrial districts, I'll bring that as a separate ext amendment. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: This probably is that -- Canning: Okay. Zaremba: -- make sure it discussed gated developn way to escape for somebc having to back into an arte backing into -- Canning: Oh. Oh, the Zaremba: Yes. Canning: Okay. Zaremba: And a wide en communities. I just didn't the time to discuss the details of that, but I have one detail esn't get missed in it and the various times that we have its, the issue has been to make sure that they provide a who unknowingly turns into and finds a gate without them or a collector. So, a way to escape or turn around without ;ion of the gate? area that they can escape, if we are going to go to gated that thought to be lost. Canning: No. And I will ca tore that. And from what Irecall -- I had not gone back and read the minutes, but from hat I recall of the Oaas Laney presentation to City Council, your response, I believe, as that any regulations regarding gated communities still needed to address the inte connectivity issues I raised in the response issues that the fire department raised. So, that would be -- it would be fairly limited to -- to incorporate concerns, you're going to h ve a fairly limited number homes within those -- those gated areas. So, that's the direc ion I'll kind of take in writing that new ordinance. And the Mayor looks like she wants to say something to me, but maybe she will save it for later. Okay. And, then, we alrea y talked about the changes to the TN-C district with regard to Mr. Jewett's proposal. nd I did say -- I did tell you before I'm okay with those changes, as long as we all understand that we will need to modify them again as soon as we get our design gui clines firmed up and ready to go. And political signs in residential districts, addre s -- they provide a content neutral strategy for signs in 5• £ l€s ~i It l~ , , d , ,z L: 3 ~. 3 ~ 7 : ;. yy .s iii . jl .~ 1. ~~ ~a~". ;; t iJ a t ~ f %~~~ t~ a , ~ , ~~ °j T~ ~ i . ~,.'~ i ~i~ ~rt ~ y 1 , A , ). ~ 33 I ~. x :.~~~ j~~{ i~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '1 ~: ~~.6 ( Y 11 ~'~ i ' ~~'~ A fl ~ ~ . . . ., . . ~ ~ ~ '. i. .:! :`7 ¢, :'~ '' 'q. ~i;-. ig. .t . . . ~~ .fir. ~..;i ~.:. ~ ; , ~ r ~ ~.., ~, ~ ,? 1' 3 ~~ ~k , .R al y 3 ~. ~~ i f ' k~ ,':~. ~ ~, ~ .~ ~ , S' .,~ '3 r~~ ~~. i ~r. E,~ 333 i jZl ~ ~, ~ ~¢ ~ ~ SI lY ~ ~ „~ ' k ~ r, ~ t, ~~ S' i .. ti I ~' { }: Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 38 of 55 residential districts, which I think was a good move on our part. So, those were the only changes to your original p oposal coming from the Planning Zoning Commission. Do you have any questions or oncems? De Weerd: Council, any Rountree: No. Just a co you to do. I think the resol Canning: Madam Mayor, my buttons, but they are c Rountree: Yes, they are De Weerd: Okay. This is testimony on this item? CI Rountree: Madam Mayor, I Borton: Second. De Weerd: Motion and favor say aye. All ayes. ns? ~t. Anna, thank you for putting up with what we asked was good. nbers of the Council, Councilmember, they know to push guys. so are you. ~ Public Hearing. Is there anyone who would like to provide uncil? 'd move that we close the Public Hearing on Item 10. and to close the Public Hearing on Item 10. All those in on carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL BYES. De Weerd: Okay. Rountree: Madam Mayor, hearing on a revised ordin~ Nary: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Madam Mayor, Mer see what she thinks, but th done into the ordinance for of you. You can certainly think most of the comment; have three full readings, b take us a little bit to get all things to do on her end, bi weeks. De Weerd: Okay. for clarification, do we need to now schedule arevised -- orwhat's the next -- bers of the Council, I think the next step -- Mrs. Canning -- next step is we can put this -- all the changes that we have nat that's necessary, then, we would bring that back in front ave it for three readings or if you want to accelerate that. I have been yours, so I don't know that there is a necessity to t that's your choice. But that's -- we can -- it will probably hat information together and Mrs. Canning has a few more t, then, we can get that on here within, I don't know, a few ~ { ~ ~ M r, ,~ I ~ ~II' ~~ ~ i a= I i, ~ k~ ~ f i~-~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~1. ~ 4 ~t'. ~ € - ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ p ~' ~ ~ ~ . F: r: S ~ t k S ,~ ~ Ir ; ~ ~ : ~ S 1 f ~ S ~ E@ C' ~ ' ~ ~ , ~ a r t~~l~ 1 ~ Q ~ p ,- ¢ y ~ : 1- ~ : 1 ~~ ~ ~ F I ~ q ,~, ~ i ~ j ~ 4i 333 ~ y y ~' , h ~~ ~ ~ ~, a t ~ ~ {. ~ l~ ~° i ~ ~ , ! p [ ~ 5 n A T ~ { ? ~ ~ n ~ `~ a 3 ~ ~r~' { ~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~~ - =k s ~'y ' e' ~ ~ ~ FI I i f ~ t Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 39 of 55 Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes. Rountree: Suggested time from staff? Canning: Oh, two or three weeks is sufficient, sir. I think two weeks is the workshop, though. Rountree: It would be. De Weerd: No. It's on the third Tuesday. Bird: July the 13th. Canning: Three weeks is the 15th. I think we could have it by the 8th. Rountree: Okay. Canning: I don't think we need to go a month. De Weerd: Okay. Rountree: Madam Mayor, I move that we approve the proposed development code text amendments and direct staff to put them in ordnance form for our consideration at the July 8th, 2008, public meeting or public hearing and set them up for an accelerated ordinance approval. Zaremba: Second. De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second to hear this on July 8th. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 11: Public Hearing: RZ 08-001 Request to Rezone 0.32 acres from R-4 to O-T zone for Trinity Assisted Livina by Elisha Ricky - 1353 West 1St Street: Item 12: Public Hearing: CUP 08-005 Request for Conditional Use Permit to operate a 24-hour Nursing Care Facility in a proposed O-T zoning district and conditional use approval for a site and building that does not meet the criteria of the Downtown Meridian Design Guidelines for Trinity Assisted Living by Elisha Ricky - 1353 West 1St Street: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r r ~ ~ iY ~ , ~~~ ~ }~~ ~r t i~ t Y, l~ f ! 1 F i { r ~_' i fit ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 5~~: ~ t~ ~k~i ~~~ ~~ f ~ ~ ~ 7 r ~`. ~ ~ ~ '~ n py } r ~ ~ ~ 1a' t • z, 4 ~ i4' ~ ~ ~ i -~ ~ d i r ~ g .~ ~ ~a4 ~-, pt; k.~r ~~C i -~ ~~ ~ l' 6FF q~ y (¢ ~ i~ ~ ie ~ ; ' ~ ~ ~`!t ~ ~ 3 - ! ,~~; } i. h, ~ i t ,W ~ii' fE r ~ ~ ~ f:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ t t ~. $fr iii ~ ~ {{ _ ~ 2 s {rs i ; '~ ; f~ l,,t h 1}(j ~ ~ ~ ti 7~ { ~C ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ( r ~ , ~ ; y ~ ~ i k 5 ~ ~ ~ l y 1 ~ ~;:~.. ~ ,F. r ~ a~. .~. .,rF ~. .. Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 40 of 55 De Weerd: Okay. Item 11 and 12 are public hearings on RZ 08-011 and CUP 08-005. I will open these two public hearings with staff comments. Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is Trinity Assisted living project. It's located at 1353 West 1st Street. The applications before you tonight are a rezone and a Conditional Use Permit. The highlights of the proposed development include a rezone of .32 acres from R-4, low density residential, to OT, Old Town. Concurrently, the applicant is also requesting conditional use approval for two -- for two different things. One is to operate a 24 hour nursing care facility and the second one is to construct a new 2,100 square foot addition to the existing residence that does not meet the downtown Meridian design guidelines. The existing building -- you can see at the top of the page here -- is 2,200 square feet and, then, the addition down below is the 2,100 square feet. And that existing building is currently operating as an eight person residential care facility and, then, the owner is proposing to expand her business to operate as a 16 patient nursing care facility. Nursing care facilities are prohibited in the R-4 zone and that's why they are requesting the Old Town designation. We do have some elevations. Staff is recommending, in lieu of full compliance with the downtown Meridian design guidelines that the applicant modify the street facing facade to include materials referenced in the design guidelines and the applicant shall incorporate larger windows, at least by three, and add brick or stone accents along the entire east facade of the building. Commission recommended approval at their May 15th, 2008, Public Hearing. Doug McCleary, Hilda McCleary, John Cole,. Mike Smith and Dathan Cole, all spoke in favor. Gale Wilde spoke in opposition and there was no one commenting. We did receive written testimony for the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, but we received it after the Planning Commission had their hearing. So, key issues of the discussion were the parking stalls located in front of the site and there was no key changes to stafFs initial recommendation. So, going back to that written testimony since the staff report, we did receive a letter dated April 30th from Mrs. Diana Stacey explaining her reasons for asking the Planning Commission recommend denial of the project, but we did not receive the letter until after the May 15th hearing. So, the copy of the letter was forwarded to the clerk and is part of the record. So, the outstanding issues for City Council are the concerns expressed by Mrs. Stacey and also please note that staff has not recommended a DA, because this has a Conditional Use Permit tied to it, but I did want to remind you that you can avail yourself of that opportunity should you desire to do so. That was all. I will answer any questions Mayor and Council may have. De Weerd: Okay. Council, any questions? Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: I'm sure this was taken into consideration, but the addition being on the front of the existing building, have we considered the setback required for -- oh, it's not on Meridian Road. Never mind. Sorry. Meridian City Council r June 17, 2008 Page 41 of 55 Canning: Yes. Zaremba: Forget that. De Weerd: That was an easy one, uh? Council, any other questions at this point? Rountree: I have none. De Weerd: Is the applicant here? Hi. McCleary: Hi. Doug -- Doug McCleary, Chesapeake Construction. I'm the representative of the applicant Elisha Ricky. De Weerd: Okay. If you will state your address as well. McCleary: 14469 Bighorn Drive. Madam Mayor and Councilmen, everything that is in the -- in the planning report, we have already gone over it, the concerns that they have, we have understood and complied with, so everything that is in that staff report will be included in the building project. Anybody have any questions forme? De Weerd: Okay. That's all you have to add? Council, any questions for the applicant? Bird: I have none. Rountree: None. De Weerd: Okay. Seeing none, thank you. Rountree: I have none. De Weerd: Okay. I do have a number of people that, also signed up in favor of the project. We have Hilda McCleary signed up for. If you'd like to testify, please, come forward. And state your name and address. H.McCleary: Can you hear me? De Weerd: Yes. H.McCleary: Okay. Hilda McCleary. The address is 14469 Bighorn Drive. De Weerd: Thank you. H.McCleary: Okay. So, I am for it. Actually, I thought it was very refreshing to have a prayer at the beginning and I don't go to a lot of these, but it's nice to hear both sides, if there is a second side, and I know it will be a nice facility and so I'm for it. That's all I have to say. ~f ~~ ~ a Y~ G ~ i~~4 ~ L i y, ~ a i, 3, ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ its I ~ ~ ~; ~ i F ~~ ~ ~~ > ~ {~ 2 i- R t ~ ~ 1'; ~' ~ ap ~ ~ri ~ ~ e ! ' ~ ~ ~ ~* ~ e i r ~ :r ~~~ ~ ~ i ~ ~, ~ ,z € ~~ i ~ - > ~ ' S ~~ ti a t F- ~ 1 t ~ ,~ v } S ~ {I k -r ~ ~ ~#` i 9, ~` ~~~ S c ¢ i a ~ c t7 g Meridian City Council • e June 17, 2008 Page 42 of 55 De Weerd: Thank you very much. Dathan Cole signed up in favor. And if I mispronounced -- pronounced your name, I apologize. Cole: That's okay. Everybody does. De Weerd: Okay. Cole: Dathan Cole, 652 East Idaho Avenue. De Weerd: But I said it right. Cole: You did. De Weerd: See, so now you can say not everyone does. Cole: Not everyone does. You did wonderful. De Weerd: There you go. Thank you for being here. Cole: You're welcome. I'm for this whole project.. It's -- just looking at the plans, I think it's going to be a nice looking building. It's going to really add to the neighborhood. I also like the fact of it -- my parents are getting a little long in their years. It's nice to think that, you know, somebody with any kind of a disability can go into a neighborhood setting, they are not in an institution someplace, you know, they still have a quality of life about it. They are close to downtown. They can go for walks. They still have things to do. They are still in the neighborhood environment. I think it's a good. Just, hopefully, that there is enough of these when I get old enough that I can go out and go there. I don't want to go someplace that's got pasty green walls and concrete and all that, so I think it's a great idea. I think it's really going to add to the neighborhood. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Pasty green might be in style then. John Cole signed up in favor of the project. That's all right. If they don't want to testify, I'm just reading into the record the name. Okay. Neil Rowe signed up for. Okay. Mike Smith signed up for. And Kathy Gravitt signed up for. Okay. Those are the names that signed up on the sign-up sheet. Is there any further testimony from the public on this application? Okay. Council, do you have any questions? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: A quick question for Anna. Do the elevations that are shown are those after the alternative compliance has been applied? E~; i I ~' ~ ~ I k; i( ~~ iii ! ~: '~ ! Meridian City Council • June 17, 2008 Page 43 of 55 Canning: No. These were the -- the beginning elevations and perhaps the applicant can -- is -- you can just nod your head. Is this the east elevation? McCleary: Yes. That's the east elevation on that side. Canning: So, this is the elevation that they have requested the additional windows? McCleary: The -- actually, the -- I'm sorry. It's the bottom one that is going to be facing the street going east and what they have asked us to do is provide athree-by-three, but I believe on the drawing that's -- that's spelled out as a 30-50. So, those windows will be in compliance to the staff report, as well as they have asked us to provide some stone accents on that -- on that front, which we have complied with as well. The elevation that you see right above it would be the west facing elevation. Or, I'm sorry, the south facing elevation. Canning: So, Mr. McCleary, you're stating that the bottom elevation is the only street facing elevation; 'correct? McCleary: That is correct. That's is correct. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Zaremba. Just so I understand, even though the notice says that this is for a building that does not meet the criteria of the downtown Meridian design guidelines, what you're suggesting would make it meet them? Canning: No, sir. The downtown design guidelines would require that it be two stories and have 50 percent glazing along the front, among other things. But the design guidelines are clearly written for retail store fronts in the historic core. We struggle with anything that wants to go on outside the historic core, but that's why the new design guidelines will address these much more appropriately. But for now they come through the CU process. Zaremba: Thank you. De Weerd: Mr. McCleary, I guess the neighbor who seems to have a concern about this, Mrs. Stacey, have you seen her letter? McCleary: Yes, I have. De Weerd: Okay. She has cited some -- some issues with the current residents and I guess what is -- what is your long term goal for the assisted living aspect of it? Who are your clients and how will you provide for the concerns of the neighbors? McCleary: I think I might bring the applicant in, so she can explain her intention and her long-terms goal for the facility. j~j 1 ', ~: f '{~ ~ ~ ~ ~. EE ~ ~: r t' ~ ~ ~ I, Y ~ t ~ ~A' ; I ~ S 5 1 t j ~. ~a s,F ~F. G i > s< Y t ' ~ ~.. ~~ 1I ~ i ~_: { ~ } e ~ i ~' t ~ ~ E~ , '' ~ F t f = ( 1. i 4.' }~ SSS~; ~ y ~ ; ~. }~ Meridian City Council • June 17, 2008 Page 44 of 55 U De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. If you will state your name and address for the record. Ricky: Elisha Ricky. 3668 South Heritage Avenue, Boise, Idaho. 83709. De Weerd: Thank you. Ricky: I am Trinity Assisted Living. Currently have an eight bed. You know that we are going to go up to a 16 and my population that I am going to be gearing towards is probably 50 to 55 and up. I always accept people with traumatic brain injuries, developmentally -- developmental delays above that age as well. So, it's not just strictly elderly, they are people with developmental delays as well and disabilities, so I don't segregate those out. So, my long term is just to keep a very calm area where my grandma and others will be able to come and stay and live and keep their independence as long as they can and, hopefully, until they pass and not ever have to go into a nursing home. De Weerd: Okay. Are you -- are you also familiar with the letter of concern from the neighbors? Ricky: I think so. De Weerd: Well, it talks about the young men who have been observed there and some of the kicking over of trash cans and -- Ricky: Okay. So, now I remember which one you're talking about. I have -- I am completely unaware of anything. Nothing was every brought to our attention. There was nothing ever called into the police department. If I saw somebody doing that I would probably call the police and let them know, but I have not been aware of that. And the majority of my neighbors know that I have an open door policy and they have always felt very comfortable walking up and talking to my staff anytime that there is any issues. We have no problem, as long as we are not divulging into personal records and confidentiality, HIPAA laws, we will -- we have no problems with letting people know what's going on. But as far as I am aware, it was never brought to my attention that it was any of my clients and I have seen and heard that because people realize that we are an assisted living facility, unfortunately, even though we are, you know, right down from many other areas up the street, we kind of -- De Weerd: You're the scapegoat. Ricky: We kind of get the catch-all what people don't want to see on the street, so -- but like I said, nobody has every had a problem coming to me and saying, you know, if I saw anything I'd sure come and let you know or to even ask and we would be happy to have -- solve the problem. De Weerd: What is your supervision ratios or staff to patients? f; i~ a ~ ~~ ~ , ~: ~~ ~~: ~~~. I I~. l~: ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~j ~ 1 5 5 t i 7 i `3 ;' t, p t~ ~~ { {: ~. i; 4 ~ y ~~ ~ 1~. , ~ r ~ ~' , ~ ; ~: E~` b: ~ ,' ~ , ~ ,~ ~ ~ F,' 3 ~ +' tti ;'! Meridian City Council • June 17, 2008 Page 45 of 55 Ricky: Well, the laws in Idaho are not specific to number of patients supervising personnel, it is more to the need of the client, and I have high functioning clients right now with some that need, you know, obviously, 24 hour. So, right now I have staffed it actually a little bit higher than necessary just simply so that as we going through this process we can see the impact of the additional staff that we are going to have on, which would be two staff 24 -- and I have got that and I have had that for eight months now and there hasn't been any large increase in traffic or any issues that I am aware of at all with the neighbors. De Weerd: So, one per four? Ricky: Well, it's not, though. It's not necessarily that. It is the needs of the clients. So, if I had clients that need like two person transfers, I always have to have two people on staff, but I will have two people on staff per eight and, then, it will accommodate the 16 as well. De Weerd: So, two people per eight residents? Ricky: And, then, it will most likely go to the two person per -- per eight hour shift for the 16 as well, unless there is somebody that is higher functioning -- or less functioning, I apologize. But I am -- I am very selective at who I welcome into the facility. I make sure that they are going to meld well, that they don't have more needs than what I can supply as an employer. So, right now I have two, but until I actually have the other eight residents admitted, I don't plan on going over that. I plan on admitting people that are capable to be cared for for those two -- De Weerd: So, two people at each shift? Ricky: Correct. De Weerd: Okay. Ricky: Yes. Yes. There is three shifts and two people per shift. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Bird. Bird: Are they LPNs, RNs, or what? Ricky: Right now I currently have care givers and they are certified for -- and delegated for medication assistance, CPR, first-aid certified. Bird: They can give -- they can give -- a ;; ~ f ~ ' ~ ' ~ I ~ t ~i ' ~ ~ ~ C R i ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ! ~ I ~ )f~. I I j p ~ 1'55 ~ I Y?. ~ ~' I ~ ^^ 7 ~ ~ F. -~ ~ " k f 1 i ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ i ' ~ ~ 3 ~I k ti 1 , , ~ ~ F i ~ ~ ' ~ f { ~ ~ I i a { ~ ~ 'I ~ C. '~` i U ~ f t ' ~ ~ ~ ~ I .I ~ ~ v ~ y ~G 1' ~ f` n ;~ ~ ~v~ i y ic: ~ !~ i" ~ ~ ~~ S' } t ~ ~ ~ ~~ ait ~ ~~ t ~ ~ J, iF ~' ~ ~ i~ ~ jI ~ ~ `~{ ~ j i~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ F 'I f ~ ' ~~ ~ ~ ~ r r a ~ ~r ' d ~ j~; i ~ i. ~ , ~ ~{~ ~ Po~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. s Y~ {{ F,.a? ~ .; ~ ~ ~ is ~ }} ;~ fv }} '~F~ ~ ~. .~~ ~. ~~ I ~ ~ !~ @~'-~ 4 ~~. '~ i ~~ ~ ~. ~~.. Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 46 of 55 De Weerd: CNA. Bird: They can give -- CNA? • Ricky: Absolutely they can. They can provide medication and all of those first-aid needs. We have an RN who is on call 24 hours a day, who lives a mile away from it and does visit the facility. Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Council, anything further? I didn't think he had too much to say. Okay. Council, any further questions? Bird: I have none, Mayor. De Weerd: No further questions? What would you like to do? And I don't feel the applicant has any closing remarks. Wow, you surprised me. I'm glad I asked. McCleary: I can make a closing remark. I do feel like -- De Weerd: If you will just state your name again for the record. McCleary: Doug McCleary. De Weerd: Thank you, Doug. McCleary: 14469 Bighorn Drive. Madam Mayor and Members of the Council, I do believe this is a great opportunity for the city to administer this facility, because it is a much needed facility in the area and I do think that it would provide that service that is also much needed. In addition, the improvement on the building itself, I believe, would help beautify the street .and, hopefully, set a standard for that -- for the downtown comdor through that area. De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Council? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: If there is no other comment, I'd move we close the Public Hearing on Items 11, RZ 08-001 and Item 12, CUP 08-005. Bird: Second. Zaremba: Second. Rountree: Okay. I have a motion and a second to close the public hearings on Items 11 and 12. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carries. } ~~ f. (iii i~ x ~ l ~ R'~. ~ ~~ ~~ i S ~ ~ ~ ~d, ~ ~~~~ ~ ' s ~ ~' ~ ~ ] ~ ~~~ r i~z j ~ ` ~~~ a f - ~: ~ ' i~'' ~ J I ~ i 2 ~~ ~r i ~k~ ~ jjj;~ t ; ~ _ ~ i ~t. ~ i € ~ ~ ~4 _~ ~ fib: ~ ~.- ~ << i ti~ t !? ~ s ~~ ~ t' e ~i ~ 13 ~ g _t~'r i : x ~ { , I 1 ~ i ~, I ~ ~ f i !}s i 1 ? ~~~. f~ le "~ ~ ~~, ~ ~ it ~,~ ~ i ~ ~ , t. i@ ~ Meridian City Council • June 17, 2008 Page 47 of 55 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Okay. Item 11 on the rezone. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. • Borton: If there is no discussion, I would move that we approve Item 11, RC 08-001. Bird: Second. Zaremba: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion second to approve Item 11. If there is no discussion, roll- call attendance -- I mean roll-call vote. Just wanted to make sure you're still all here. All ayes. Thank you. Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Zaremba: And just for the record, I was never all here. De Weerd: Apparently I'm not either. Okay. Item 12. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: I would move that we approve Item 12, CUP 08-005, to include staff and applicant comments, including the alternative compliance for the design guidelines. Zaremba: Second. De Weerd: Okay. Okay. I have a motion and a second on Item 12 to approve. Is there any discussion? Seeing none, Madam Clerk. Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 13: Public Hearing: MI 08-004 Request for a Miscellaneous application for Modification of the Development Agreement for Dorado Subdivision by ,, ~ ~,~ ~ ~ v ~ lil ~ I 44 {} i a r 1~~ I ~ _ I F 'i i f~K 7 1~ ~ ~ '~ ~: ~ ~; 1 f1 i li S ~ 1 ~ ~ ~t if; ~i ~I., i'. ~ t y + .", }~ I l a fF 3 ~ _ }~ Y -~ ~ a ~~, ~' ~it I r ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 i ~# 3~ ~ 7: .t r, 3 3 r c 9 ;, ~ ~ ;ter , ~+ ~' s x '} ,i: ~ ~!r `' ' i ~~ ~ ! j ~'.- ~~1 ~ ~ ? f~. 1~ ~ f ~~ ~ s~~ i. ~ ~ #'.. y 1 3 ~ $111 ( ~. Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 48 of 55 U the City of Meridian -Northwest Comer of South Eagle Road and East Overland Road De Weerd: Okay. Item 13 is a Public Hearing on MI 08-004. It has been requested to continue. I will, however, open the Public Hearing and ask for a motion to continue to July 22nd. Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I move that we continue Item 13 until July 22nd, 2008. Zaremba: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to continue this Public Hearing on Item 13 to July 22nd. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 14: Public Hearing: TE 08-003 Request for approval of an 18 month Time Extension to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the Final Plat for Kelly Creek Commercial (the 8~' phase of Fulfer Subdivision) and commence the use approved with the conditional use permit in accordance with the conditions of approval of AZ 03-013, PP 03-014, CUP 03-028 & TE 06-025 by Blackhawk/Meridian, LLC -Northwest Comer of Linder Road and McMillan Road: De Weerd: Item 14 is a Public Hearing on TE 08-003. I will ask -- or I will open the Public Hearing with staff comments. Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, .this is Kelly Creek Commercial property. It's located at the northwest comer of Linder and McMillan Road. The application before you tonight is a time extension. They have already exhausted their director approved time extension and are now requesting one from Council. But Council did ask me to make a presentation on time extensions. That was scheduled for July 8th. It will now be the 15th. So, this one made it onto an agenda before I asked staff to hold the time extensions until after we have the workshop discussion on it, but I went over the time extension with the planner and I feel that it's -- that there really isn't much to talk about tonight, so we just decided to proceed forward. And on that line, what you have before you is an approve final plat. It's a four lot final plat. The property is already zoned. It was zoned C-G, but there is a DA that requires conditional use approval for a concept plan prior to any development on the site. So, there is already an opportunity for the city to have additional comments at the time of development. So, we do not have elevations for you tonight. There was no written testimony since the C jF. ~ 3 ~` 1 Fi ~'~s~ ~ u i ~i ~ ;' ' CCC ~ ~ {{{ F ] { {~ Y~ { 1 j! 5 1, ~ j ~ ~ ~ 4 i~r ~~ t y ik '. i X77 . ~ ~ ~ ~ f~~ - ~ , ~f r~ ~ F t ~ x.r ~ a `k i 1 e ~~ a ,~ r ~- .FCF ~, ~' i - 3 ~~, F ~r r i ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~~ _ ~' i 9s~'F ~ 6 ~ ~~ ~i ~ g[~H ` ~ ~ iYY ~~ ' ~ ~.. R: F -fF i ~' .i ~ ~ ~ i s ~ y 7' ~, ~ ` v `7 ~ i 1 r ~ t ~ ~.. ~ $ i 4 t r, Meridian City Council June 17, 2008 Page 51 of 55 Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I move that we approve the requested eight month time extension for Item 14, TE 08-003, Kelly Creek Commercial, with an additional stipulation that the approval include the future elevations would be consistent with current and/or future design criteria established by the city. Borton: Second. De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion a second. Discussion? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: It would be the criteria that exists at the time the final plat comes in? Rountree: Yes. Borton: Okay. Canning: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes. Canning: For clarification on the existing criteria, that would be for structures along an entryway corridor? Rountree: Correct. De Weerd: Okay. Any further discussion? Madam Clerk, will you, please, call roll. Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 15: Public Hearing: Covered Load Ordinance: Continue Public Hearing to June 24, 2008 De Weerd: Item 15 is a Public Hearing on our covered load ordinance. Mr. Nary. Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, you're probably familiar with the covered load ordinance. We have talked about it plenty. This was the night set for the first ` , `'' i {[~ ' i ' r~ ' 1' i 1 . ~~ ~ 7.7 ~ j ~ 'I ll~ } t I 1~ 1 l~ 3 4 ~ t' $4 a ~ 7 E S 1 jc 7 ~1 ~{ f ? }~ j~ .. j ~ j3Z I f ~ d {{~ -~ F t ti ~ ~ i ~ _ ((~{ ~ ~ a, i , t i `3 ~ ~ ~~ ~ r: ra '~ i' i~ s ~ ~~, ~ l ~ ~ 5 ~ ass ' ~ ~i is i ~ i `1 ~l ` ~ ', 6 l7.; ~ 1 ~ ~ x~ ~ ~~~ ! e ~ ~ r~ ~) { ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ ^f - 2 • L5 j I I ~,, j P ; June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-A REQUEST Approve Minutes of June 3, 2008 City Council Regular Meeting AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. F ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ 1 '' I' ~ ~~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ F ~ 1 Y 3'. ~ ~ a ii. ~ ± ~ ,I t~ ! ~ ~ ~ , ~ ilk F t r . I ~ ~?r. j ~ ~ } r ~~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ii ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ r ~~ ~" r- a ~ - ~u' ' ~x~ f ~ i , ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c. - ~; Y~ ~ ~ - .I~ ~ ~ ~~~ I F ~ (~ ~ j Y ~ y ~ ~i i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ _ g ~TT ~ q p t 1~ ~~ ~'~ ~ ~ i t (~ i ~ ~ +++ ~ f ~ E l F 0 1 11 ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~s, [ ~ i H ~ ! ~f., _ 1, ti 1f . t~ i ~4 i I1 ~`~ # ~~ , ~ [1 ~ 1 ti ~ ~ ~ ~ i v: ~q'; ~ f ~f ~ '~ ~ ~~$ Z'FE ~~~ fti ` ~i ~ L )) S i ' 1 t f ' 3 u , ~ - ( 7 •~ C ~ 7 !k ~ ~ i t 7 ~ A ~ 1 ~ 1 1 v ~ ; i - CL f t ~~ , I ~ ti~ t ~ , i '~ ., : ~ ' ~ ' x 1Y ( ~ ' ,' ~ ~ ~ f r ~ ~ l~ ~ ' ~ ~ , a i ~ e 1 1 ~ ~ x y,, ~, 3 `,r~ {{ p i2 , p y COMMENTS June 13, 2008 AZ 08-003 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Mason & Stanfield ITEM NO. 5-B REQUEST Findings for Approval -Request for Annexation and Zoning of 12.06 acres from RUT to R-40 and C-C zones for Regency at River dalley (Revised) - 2500 North Eagle Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See attached Findings CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: ~ /~ CITY WATER DEPT: ~( CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: ~~ f ~ ~ ~ Date: -l ~Q Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Cffy of Meridian. ~,f ~. r r ( 0 t ~!IR ~~ Y ~+ ~`f~ 1 t 1 1 S f, ~f ~ - f 7 ~a; ~ 2 {1tj ~ . y 37)i 1 ~# iii 7~ _ k ~ ~ 1 f ''' Ei_ ' ~'~ ;i ~ ~ ~ ~ ' F $ ~; R ir: r ~ ~ 2 [ ,r 6 IF~ ` ~ I ~ 5 iy~ '~W,}}~ (i j iE t _ 1 ~ f ~ s ~„ y, i ~. fir! ! ~ ;~ ~ }~~ ' '4''!i ~~-! i ~~.~ ~ l a q,.. ~ e + f ~ ~~ ~ f ~ ~~~ ~. ~~ i ~ 3 1 r ~ i ~ 3 ti ~ F 8 ! E ~~ f ~ ~ 4 ~ ! ~ €~ SY' P r; ~!~ - ... ', ,~ !. r5: Y4 2 :0 r r ~ ~*cr -~1 _ V ,._ i- ~ ~ ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN (~E IDIAN~-- FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ~~A~~ DECISION a4c ORDER In the Matter of Annexation and Zoning of 12.06 acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) and C-C (Community Business) (1.5 acres) zoning districts; Conditional Use Permit for amulti-family. residential development in a proposed R-40 zoning district; and Variance to UDC Table 11-3C-6 for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required for multi-family dwellings, by Mason & Stanfield, Inc. Case No(s). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 For the City Council Hearing Dates of: Apri122, May 20, and May 27, 2008 (Findings on the June 17, 2008 City Council agenda) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-SA. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 -I- j a ~ 4' I { y1 ~f S ~ ~ 1 ~ -_ ~ ~ ~~ ~ i ~, 4 ~ f ~ ~i ~ ~ 1 r ~ S 1 ~ r- ~ } E F i~ i t e , ~` i 1 ° F ~ , r ti. ~ k ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ P~ t ~ ~ ~, m~ I ~i I ~ i 3;; ~, ~ pg ~~ ~~ ~~ ~I. k ~' i } ~;~ y. ~~ ~ , r I 1 i L. ` f t' }} F $i i % ~ ~~ ~ ~. ' 3 ! i ! , t e ~ ~ ~ r : ~ ~iF ~. ~~ ~, ~ ~ ~ £ s5 1s , ~ ' ~. ~. I J! ~ zz 3 f ~'i ~. ~~ ,~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ I ~ 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Legal Description, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Building Elevations, Development Agreement, and the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-SA and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The Applicant's Annexation and Zoning request, as evidenced by having submitted the legal description and exhibit map, stamped and dated June 14, 2006, by Darin Holzhey, PLS, included in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008 incorporated by reference, is hereby conditionally approved. 2. A Development Agreement is required with approval of the subject Annexation & Zoning application and shall include the provisions noted in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008 incorporated by reference. 3. The Applicant's Conditional Use Permit request as evidenced by having submitted the Site Plan (dated 3/12/08), Landscape Plan (dated 1/08), and Building Elevations included in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, is hereby conditionally approved. 4. The Applicant's Variance request for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required for multi-family developments is hereby approved. 5. The site specific and standard conditions of approval are as shown in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Eighteen (18) Month Conditional Use Permit Duration CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 -2- ;~:{ ~~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ y , ~~ x I ~ i ~ ~ ti g .r t ~ (! ~ ; 4 t.l ~ , ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ a i i B L ~ " a 1 ~ ; ~ E ~ #~ ~ ;~ ~ ~ ' { ~'ff 1 ' t ~' ~ ~ ? 3 ~ ~ j ~~ i ~ ~ l~,r r ( _ i( # j ~~~ ~ d ~' ~ 4 ~ ' 4 I ~ E 6' }j2 a k~9q 1 ? y p~:~ Z ~ ~ ~ p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ FF { q < i' x ~ S W RI t . G ~ ~5 t ~ I~. 1 F 4r~ ~ ` f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~1, 3 y t~~ ~ { b . ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 9 ~~ .~~ 4 ~ ~! ~ i ~ k i; {{{{j ~ a .. i ~ i ~ !~3 rj E ~ ~ I~ ~ 1 -i'1 ~ c v ~ Please take notice that the conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of eighteen (18) months unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time, the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting, the final plat must be recorded within this eighteen (18) month period. For projects with multiple phases, the eighteen (18) month deadline shall apply to the first phase. In the event that the development is made in successive contiguous segments or multiple phases, such phases shall be constructed within successive intervals of one (1) year from the original date of approval. If the successive phases are not submitted within the one (1) year interval, the conditional approval of the future phases shall be null and void. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-SB-6.G.1, the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1) eighteen (18) month period. Additional time extensions up to eighteen (18) months as determined and approved by the Commission maybe granted. With all extensions, the Director or Commission may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 'The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, a denial of a plat or conditional use permit entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review maybe filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which maybe adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the conditional use permit approval may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 -3- ~~ By a tion of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the lay ~f ~t~,v`~ , 2008. COUNCIL MEMBER DAVID ZAREMBA VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD VOTED MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED -~ (TIE BREAKER) `````,`~~~~ „ ~~or Tam y e Weerd ~,,~ Attest: ) ~o~~.~~~~'~ ~~~o/•qy ~.,~,, L Jaycee an, City Clem ~ '~ :.y, ' ~~ O .tee ~ r ~~~ , P~ ~,e Copy served upon Applicant,'~'I`~t~, ~~~„~D~ment, Public Works Department and City Attorney. BY~ ~~ ,~ 0 ~ ~_..) Dated: ~ - ~-® City Clerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 -4- ~ ; I Iii ~~ S '. 6 ~:: }' r ~ ' ~ ~ i ~ ~, ~i ~_ ~ ~ !i~ ~~.JT f 1. - ~ ~ ~ - ' 1 ~ i ~ k r a .fr ~ _~ ~~ - { 4~' ( ~f f [iF ~~. ~} ~~ i ~ ! L ~ (~ f ~ ~ y x ~ i ;~- { (~ ~ '3 ~ 3 ~ ~ i i s ~_ 6 i t f ~ ~ ~~ ~~ , , }d { ~'~ ~ t. i `! ss ' ~ ~~ j , } ~ ( ' !~ 1 .~ ~ vas: ,4 .T x ~ ` ~e ?~ 3 ~f ~ ~ ~ ~ 1333 ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ } ~. ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ , ~.~ } ~ t 2.~ . l } lr E; .n S h i ~ 2 .V S ~ ~ ~ . ~ e i E y q i ~ ~ '~ { ~ ?i 4' n + ~ ' jr t4 f ~ S r ~ a jR ~ ~; 1 t i~ ~~ ~ '~~~ ~ t 1 t i . ~ k -~ ~ ~ { :1 ~~ ~ ~ . ~ i . P i } 1 - ~ ~: f t ~ j. 4 Y~~f ti ~i. 1 j ` f ~ j t i j t ~- - 4 ~ ~ I' I. ' CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANN][NG DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 STAFF REPORT Hearing Date: May 20, 2008 (Continued from April 22, 2008) TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Sonya Wafters, Associate City Planner (208) 884-5533 SUBJECT: Regency at River Valley (Revised) E IDIAN 6l~hi • AZ-08-003 Annexation and Zoning of 12.06 acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) and C-C (Community Business) (1 acres) zoning districts • CUP-08-004 Conditional Use Permit for amulti-family residential development in a proposed R-40 zoning district ,.1, .. ,.i. •i. •,. , ~ . . r" b.:..L..=......,...e e~++,...il,..~, .. ~._..~nni-m v... ~ QT~7 GG/C 1 D .7 -+'1 a-_ ~ b ~~ Pte. ~ v~ac~c ouu~vvrac~`ruccca Withdrawn • VAR-08-002 Variance to UDC Table 11-3C-6 for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required for multi-family dwellings • PS-08-004 Request for approval of private streets within the proposed development The Commission heard these applications at the public hearing on March 6 2008 At the meeting on March 6"'. the applicant decided to withdraw the Variance (VAR-OS-OOI) request for a temporary access to SH 55/Eagle Road At that meeting, the Commission voted to continue the project until the March 20"' meeting so staff could update the conditions f~pa, proval (Staff had originally included draft conditions of approval because Staff was recommending several significant changes to the site plan); so the site plan could be revised by the applicant• and so comments/conditions could be obtained from ACHD. On March 6"` the maker of the motion _for continuance stated that they would like to see the following changes made to the site plan • 1) Add an emergency access only driveway to Allys Way: 2) Provide a IO-foot wide mulli-use pathway on the site in accordance with Parks Department comments• and 3) Remove the temporary access to Eagle Road The maker of the motion also stated that their recommendation for approval would be prefaced on the applicant and NMID reaching an agreement pertaining to the relocation of the Downey Sublateral The Commission supported the Variance (VAR-08-002) request for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required. The applicant has submitted a revised site plan which staff has reviewed and made modifications to the staff report accordingly Changes to the staff report since the March 6`" version are in bold italics and underline Comments have been received from ACHD and are included in Exhibit B of this report Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HE~ATE OF MAY 20, 2008 1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST The Applicant, Mason & Stanfield, Inc., has applied for Annexation and Zoning (AZ) of 12.06 acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) and C-C (Community Business) (1.5 acres). Concurrently, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is requested for amulti-family residential development on 10.56 acres in a proposed R-40 zoning district. ~e A variances (VAR) to the Unified Development Code sre is also requested as follows: 1) ;r-a~aacei~lC~ ~L~~~ ..'';"'' ~°'~'~;'-;+^ ~° °sc-~ss~es~e~~t~~~y~s--~e-al}e~~~a~e~e~ae~ess~e-~~e '~""'' ' "+'' " "'' +''"'~as ^"°" n°^'" + a. a' Variance to UDC Table 11-3C-6 for a reduction in the number of parking spaces required for multi-family dwellings in covered carports or garages The applicant is proposing 204 multi-family living units within 9 apartment buildings, a clubhouse, swimming pool area, a putting green, several gazebos, an entry water feature, pathways, extensive landscaping, and a playground area. The site is located at 2500 N. Eagle Road, approximately 'h mile north of the Fairview/Eagle intersection on the east side of Eagle Road. The subject property is currently located within the Urban Service Planning Area. 2. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION The subject applications (AZ, CUP, & VARY) were submitted to the Planning Department for concurrent review. By city code, the Planning & Zoning Commission is not required to hold a hearing on or act on the due variance applications. However, because the variance requests-are is integral to the project, staff recommends that the Commission, as part of their action, state a preference on the twe variance requests. Below, staff has provided a detailed analysis of the proposed applications. Staff is recommending approval of the subject AZ, CUP and P5 applications per the conditions of approval in Exhibit B and the Development Agreement provisions in Section 10 Staff is recommending denial of the VAR application per the analysis in Section 10 and the findings in Exhibit D. .,a 1.,,.. ~~ ....., i..._,° ..,... ~ s. 7 Arum ,,,.a 7mr~ a+.,+~ ; .°~; +i. +:.:" .. ~ z. :, a t, *i. rr na 7 ~:o~oa x~rar~ 1...+ *1...+ +1.., !"~..mrru~;.... .7°F ......~:.. ..~;1 .+ 1..+.,.. .~..+° ~ t1. 1' t ~: ~co ~sa`2 ° "+,. ~:,e ";+° ,a., ~ sue:, :•~ a e +; ~n a ~ :.~ ~ °, ^ ,.n CUP reauest. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearin: i. In favor: Lars Anderson. Bach Homes; Scott Stanfield, Mason Stanfield Enineerin ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Andrew Wilk iv. Written testimony: David Kleinert Andrew Wilk v. Staff presentin application: Caleb Hood; Sonya Wafters vi. Other staff commentin on application: None b. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: i. The addition of an emer~ency access driveway to the site from Allys Way ii. Support of the request for annexation of 1.5 acres with a C-C zoning designation if the Variance request for a temporary access to Eagle Road is withdrawn• iii. Removal of one of the multi-family structures in order to provide covered parkin as reauired by the UDC for multi-family developments; Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE2 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA1~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 iv. The request for a variance for a reduction in the number of covered parkins spaces required. v. The encroachment of structures and landscapine within the easement for the Stokesberrv/Downey Lateral alone the south boundary and the proposed relocation of the lateral and easement further to the south. vi. Allowance of a 5-foot wide multi-use pathway throueh the site within a public use easement and sienaee identifyine it as a public pathway if a 10-foot wide pathway is constructed alone Allys Wav and E. River Valley Roa as approved by the Parks Department; c. Key Commission Chance(s) to Staff Recommendation. i. Required an emereency access only driveway to Allys Wav ii. Reauired a multi-use pathway on the site in accordance with Parks Department comments. iii. Removed the temporary access reauest (Variance) to Eaele Road• and iv. Recommendation of approval is based on the applicant and NA'lID reachinc an agreement pertaininc to the relocation of the Downey Sublateral d. Outstandine Issue(s) for City Council: i. The Commission was supportive of the requested variance for a reduction in the number of covered parkins spaces required. staff is not supportive If the parkins variance is not Granted a new site plan should be submitted ii. Comments from ACRD have been received and are included in Ezhibit B of this report. iii. The applicant has submitted a private street application as required by Condition of Approval #1.2.3 (see Ezhibit B). Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE3 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HE~ATE OF MAY 20, 2008 .~ ev COUnC'1 .hanues to Staff/C'nmmiccinn RP~nmmP i. Additional provision to be added to the Development Agreement• The Citv will not approve the ordinance for annexation of the requested parcel until one of three contingencies occurs• a) The HIeiner North Parcel >7A is ciunpd and the annp~atinn n''~1nan 1 ~ - bl The ROW for River Va ley Street is dedicated to A(`un with accecc to Faoly Road• - - - ---- - - - cl The ROW for Alleys WavBecord Road is d di ated to A(' with a ecc t 'ew Avenue or Ustick Road Thi wo old a low temporary u e of he ea er until cuch time a iy r Va ley 4treet is cnnctrnrte Note: The City does not guarantee that any of these conditions may nccuY • hip the one-veaY time frame of the DA anvrova~ These conditions maybe modired through the DA modification Drocess 3. PROPOSED MOTION Partial ApprovaUPartial Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Numbers AZ-08- 003, CUP-08-004, and PS-08-004 ^~a *~'° °^' °^* ~ ° ^*~° p- -.~ ~ n c~ ~ n nn. z ' "'b ~z~ z~~ ~-gg_gg3 and v ^ n no nni p deny File Number VAR-08-002, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008 with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Approval After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve File Numbers AZ-08- 003, CUP-08-004, ~-98-AA~ VAR-08-002, and PS-08-004 as presented during the hearing, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) (You should state specific reasons for approval of the variance.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Numbers AZ-08-003, CUP-08-004, ^'v^r; VAR-08-002, and PS-08-004 as presented during the hearing, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial of the annexation, conditional use permit, and variance, and what the applicant could do to gain your approval in the future.) Continuance I move to continue File Numbers AZ-08-003, CUP-08-004, ~ ^- Dom- ^, VAR-08-002, and PS- 08-004 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) 4. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS a. Site Address/Location: 2500 N. Eagle Road (Parcel #51104233914 & #51104233920) NW % of Section 4, T.3N., R.lE. b. Owners: RAMI, LLC; MBJR, LLC; Eagle Mesa, LLC; Eagle Coulter, LLC; JACOM, LC Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 4 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEDATE OF MAY 20, 2008 c. Applicant: Mason & Stanfield, Inc. 314 Badiola Street Caldwell, Idaho 83605 d. Representative: Lars Anderson, Bach Homes e. Present Zoning: RUT (Ada County) f. Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Mixed Use -Regional g. Description of Applicant's Request: From the applicant's narrative: "We are requesting annexation of two zones and an accompanying CUP. The annexation request includes 1.5 acres (for C-C zone) for the westerly portion adjacent to Eagle Road and 10.91 acres for an R-40 zone. The request complies with the current Comprehensive Plan. The project will comply with the UDC with the exception of covered parking ~ a ~ *°-~~°r°^ ° ~ *~ rT ~' ~ n -'." (See Applicant's letter for more detail.) 1. Date of Site Plan (attached in Exhibit A): *~~~°'- ~ c~ ~nn~ 3/12/08 (stamped by R. Scott Stanfield, P.E., and Darin Holzhey, P.L.S., °~'~) 2. Date of Landscape Plan (attached in Exhibit A): r^„••°-~~'~,'^^' 1/08 (prepared by Lars Anderson, Bach Homes) 5. PROCESS FACTS a. The subject application will in fact constitute an Annexation & Zoning as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of UDC 11-SA-2, a public hearing is required before the Commission and City Council on this matter. b. The subject application will in fact constitute a Conditional Use Permit as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of UDC 11-SA-2, a public hearing is required before the Commission and City Council on this matter. c. The subject applications will in fact constitute a Variance as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of UDC 11-SA-2, a public hearing is required before the City Council on this matter. d. Newspaper notifications published on: February 18, 2008 and March 3, 2008 (Commission); March 31, and April 14.2008 (Gifu Councill e. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: February 12, 2008 (Commission); March 28, 2008 (City Council) f. Applicant posted notice on site by: February 22, 2008 (Commission); Apri19.2008 (City Council 6. LAND USE a. Existing Land Use(s): This property is currently vacant with some existing outbuildings associated with a former residence. b. Description of Character of Surrounding Area: This area contains a mix of single-family residential properties, commercially zoned vacant land, and office uses. c. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 5 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 1. North: Vacant commercial property, zoned C-G 2. East: Vacant commercial property, zoned C-G and single-family residences in Redfeather Estates subdivision, zoned R-4 3. South: Vacant property (in the process of being zoned C-G -Meridian Town Center), zoned RUT (Ada County) 4. West: Single-family residence and vacant property, zoned RUT (Ada County); office uses (on the west side of Eagle Road), zoned L-O; and vacant property, zoned C-G d. History of Previous Actions: The following applications were submitted for this property in 2006 and all were denied by the City Council: • Annexation and Zoning (AZ-06-035) of 12.06 acres to C-C (Community Business District) (1.50 acres) and R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) • Conditional Use Permit (CUP-06-022) for amulti-family development consisting of 204 multi-family residential units • Private Street (PS-06-006) request adjacent to the proposed multi-family units • Variance (VAR-06-014) request to UDC 11-3C-6A to provide less than the required number of covered parking stalls for multi-family dwellings • Variance (VAR-06-015) request to UDC 11-4.3.27B3 to provide less than 80 squaze feet of private, usable open space for each multi-family dwelling unit • Variance (VAR-06-016) request to UDC 11-3h-4B2 to construct a vehiculaz access to a state highway at a location other than a section line road or the half mile mazk between sections e. Existing Constraints and Opportunities: 1. Public Works: Location of sewer: This property is proposing to connect to sewer mains located in Eagle Road. Location of water: This property is proposing to connect to water service mains located in Eagle Road. Issues or concerns: None 2. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: The South Slough runs along the northern boundary of this site. The Downey Sublateral runs along the south boundary of the site. 3. Existing trees: There are existing trees on the site that aze proposed to be removed. The applicant shall comply with the mitigation requirements listed in UDC 11-3B-1 OC. 4. Floodplain: This property does not lie within the floodplain or floodway. 5. Hazards: The South Slough is located along the northern boundary of this site and may create a water hazard for small children as it will remain uncovered. 6. Proposed Zoning: R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) & C-C (Community Business) (1.5 acres) 7. Size of Property: 12.06 acres f. Landscaping Regency at River Valley (revised) L ~ `~. :. .,, .. ,~ :, I. IIIli iE~~~~ kil 1~ ~~~~'t~~`E , ~ ~ ~. i f ' 'Ir I f t ' ` ; ~ -, r i i ~'~~~ ! ~l ill- !l~E~31; € PAGE 6 << ~~ a ' ~~ << t n f s~ ~, z ~' ~~ '' ~:t ~ ~ ~; :, ~~ ~ ~.t ~~ a ~. E, } ~~ ~'- ,, z ~' CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAR~DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 1. Width of street buffer(s): A 35-foot wide buffer is required along Eagle Road/SH 55, an arterial street; a 20-foot wide buffer is required along Allys Way, a collector street, and a 20- foot wide buffer will be required along the future E. River Valley Road, a collector street. Street buffer landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the standazds listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. 2. Width of buffer(s) between land uses: A 25-foot wide buffer is required in commercial districts adjacent to any existing residential uses. There is currently an existing residence (parcel #1104234102) located at the south boundary of the portion of the property proposed to be zoned commercially. If the residential use of this property exists at the time of development (i.e. CZC submittal), a 25-foot wide buffer shall be provided along that boundary. Buffers to adjoining land uses shall be installed in accordance with the standazds listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. 3. Percentage of site as open space: 18% or 1.91 acres of useable open space 4. Other landscaping standazds: Pazking lot landscaping shall be installed per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. g. Amenities: Per UDC 11-4-3-27D.2, 4+ amenities are required for this development with at least one from each category (i.e. quality of life, open space, recreation). The following amenities aze proposed: walking trails, clubhouse, water feature, swimming pool, a putting green, several gazebos, and a tot lot. The applicant has complied with this requirement. h. Off-Street Pazking: UDC 11-3C-6 requires multi-family dwellings with 1 bedroom to have 2 pazking spaces per unit, 1 in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 481-bedroom units, which requires 48 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces. Multi-family dwellings with more than 1 bedroom aze required to have 2 pazking spaces per unit in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 156 units with more than I bedroom, which requires 312 covered spaces. A total of 360 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces are required on the site for a total of 408 spaces. The applicant has provided X93-299 covered spaces and ~ I09 uncovered spaces for a total of 408 spaces. A variance is requested for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required. i. Required Dimensional Standazds for Multi-family Residential Use in the R-40 Zone, per UDC 11-4-3-27B and 11-2A-8: 1. Minimum Building Setback: A minimum 20-foot wide setback is required along the south and east property boundaries adjacent to E. River Valley Road and Allys Way because of the required 20-foot wide street buffers (per UDC Table 11-2A-8) and a minimum 10-foot wide setback is required along the north and west property boundaries (per UDC 11-4-3-27B). 2. Maximum Building Height: 60 feet Summary of Proposed Streets and/or Access: Access to the site is proposed from two access points to/from the future extension of E. River Valley Road. " ~ --;,G ~ - *~--~~- The applicant is proposing to construct "~ 26' drive aisles within the multi-family development; Staff is requesting that the applicant submit a private street application and that minimum 26-foot wide private streets are provided. The applicant is proposing to construct a segment of Allys Way on the east boundary of the site in alignment with the existing Allys Way north of the site, on the north side of Ustick Road; Staff is supportive of Allys Way being constructed. An emer~ency only access to Allys Way to the east is nat proposed; Staff is sunuortive of this access. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 7 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20 2008 El-iSPH4C-khi~-~tanlia~tir ' 1' ~• ~ ,„, ,.1.L.,.«:..~ a~_._~_~W_~._ t__1~_ _ •., ., rr YY o r Further, as of the print date of this report, comments have not been received from ACHD. However, Staff spoke with Matt Edmonds at ACRD and he stated that the applicant will be required to construct half the street section of E. River Valley Road abutting the site consisting of 24 feet of pavement and a 7-foot wide sidewalk (as proposed by the applicant). The applicant is proposing to dedicate and construct the whole right-of--way for Allys Way on the eastern portion of the site. Matt did not think that an emergency access point to Allys (as required by City Staff) to/from the site would be a problem. Further, ACHD is requiring a road trust deposit for half of the construction cost of the bridge over the South Slough. Please see Section 10, Analysis, and Exhibit B of this report for more information. 7. COMMENTS MEETING On February 15, 2008 a joint agency and department meeting was held with service providers in this area. The agencies and departments present include: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian Parks Department, Meridian Public Works Department, Meridian Police Department, and the Sanitary Services Company. Staff has included comments, conditions and recommended actions in Exhibit B below. 8. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS This property is designated "Mixed Use -Regional" on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. In Chapter VII of the Comprehensive Plan, this designation is defined in part as an area that is situated in highly visible or transitioning parts of the City where innovative and flexible design opportunities are encouraged. The MU-R designation allows for over 200,000 square feet of non- residential uses, residential densities ranging from 3 to 40-dwelling units per acre, mixed use neighborhood and mixed use commercial uses, as well as regional commercial uses such as entertainment and employment centers and clean industry. Staff believes that the requested C-C and R-40 zoning of the property with 17.86 dwelling units per acre planned for the multi-family portion of the development, complies with the MU-R designation for this property (please see Analysis, Section 10 below for more information). Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to the proposed development (staff analysis in italics below policy): • Chapter VII, Goal III, Objective A, Action 1 -Require that development projects have planned for the provision of all public services. When the City established its Area of City Impact, it planned to provide City services to the subject property. The City of Meridian plans to provide municipal services to the subject property in the following manner - Sanitary sewer and water service will be extended to the project at the developer s expense. - The subject lands currently lie within the jurisdiction of the Meridian Rural Fire District. Once annexed the lands will be under the jurisdiction of the Meridian City Fire Department, who currently shares resource and personnel with the Meridian Rural Fire Department. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 8 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20 2008 - The subject lands currently lie within the jurisdiction of the Ada County Sheriffs Off ce. Once annexed, the lands will be serviced by the Meridian Police Department (MPD). - The roadways adjacent to the subject lands are currently owned and maintained by the Ada County Highway District (AChID). This service will not change. - The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian School District No. 2. This service will not change. - The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian Library District. This service will not change and the Meridian Library District should suffer no revenue loss as a result of the subject annexation. Municipal, fee-supported, services will be provided by the Meridian Building Department, the Meridian Public Works Department, the Meridian Water Department, the Meridian Wastewater Department, the Meridian Planning Department, Meridian Utility Billing Services, and Sanitary Services Company. • Chapter V, Goal I, Objective A, Action 4 -Develop and maintain greenbelts along waterways. The applicant is proposing to construct a section of multi-use pathway on the site that will connect to the future master pathway planned along the north side of the South Slough via a pedestrian bridge at the northwest corner of the site. • Chapter V, Goal I, Objective A, Action 11 -Improve and protect creeks (Five Mile, Eight Mile, South Slough ...etc.) throughout commercial, industrial, and residential areas. The South Slough, which runs along the northern boundary of this site, should be improved and protected during development of the site. Chapter V, Goal I, Objective A.1 -Preserve and conserve our waterways, wetlands, wildlife habitat, and other natural resources. The South Slough, a natural waterway, runs along the northern boundary of this site. As a natural waterway, it will remain open and should be preserved. • Chapter VII, Goal I, Objective D, Action 9 -Require new residential development to provide permanent perimeter fencing to contain construction debris on site and prevent windblown debris from entering adjacent agricultural and other properties. The applicant is proposing to construct a 6 foot tall chain linkfence along the north property boundary adjacent to the South Slough in accordance with UDC 11-3A-6B3. Six foot tall vinyl fencing is proposed along the west property boundary. Temporary construction fencing shall be constructed prior to release of building permits in all areas where permanent fencing is not proposed, to contain debris during construction. • Chapter V, Goal III, Objective D, Action 3 -Require all new parking lots to provide landscaping in internal islands. Landscaping is shown on the landscape plan within the parking areas in planter islands for the residential portion of the development. All parking lot landscaping shall be installed per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. • Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 1 -Protect existing residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels. The applicant is proposing a residential zone adjacent to Redfeather Subdivision, a residential subdivision, at the east boundary of the site and the existing residence at the Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 9 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNINGARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARI~ATE OF MAY 20, 2008 southwest corner of the site. The extension of Allys Way also separates this site from Redfeather Subdivision. If the property adjacent to Eagle Road is zoned commercially as proposed, a 25 foot wide landscape buffer is required to be constructed adjacent to residential uses. Staff finds that the proposed residential development should be compatible with the existing residential properties in the area. • Chapter VII, Goal I, Objective C, Action 4 -Require new residential development to meet development standards regarding landscaping, signage, fences, and walls, etc. The Applicant will be required to construct a 20 foot wide landscape buffer along E. River Malley Road that complies with UDC 11-3B-7, Landscape Buffers along Streets. All signage proposed for the site must be approved through a sign permit and shall comply with UDC 11- 3D-10, Table 2. Fencing proposed on the site shall comply with UDC 11-3A-7. • Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 10 - Support a variety of residential categories (low-, medium-, and high-density single-family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. Staff believes that the proposed high-density multi family residential development will assist in providing a variety of residential housing opportunities in the City. 9. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE a. Schedule of Uses: Unified Development Code (LTDC) 11-2A-21ists multi-family developments as a conditional use in the R-40 zoning district. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3-27) apply to multi-family developments; please see Section 10, Analysis below for more information. UDC Table 11-2B-21ists several uses that are principal permitted uses, conditional uses, and prohibited uses in the proposed C-C zoning district. Among the principal permitted uses are animal care facilities; indoor/outdoor arts, entertainment or recreation facilities; building material, garden equipment and supplies; churches, group daycares, education institutions, financial institutions, flex space, fuel sales facility, healthcare or social services, information industry, Laundromat, mortuary, nursery or urban farm, parks, personal or professional service, public/quasi-public use, restaurant, retail store, minor vehicle repair, vehicle washing facility, Vertical integrated residential project, etc. b. Purpose Statement of the Proposed Districts: Residential Districts: Per UDC 11-2A-1, the purpose of the residential districts is to provide for a range of housing opportunities consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Connection to the City of Meridian water and sewer systems is a requirement for all residential districts. Residential districts are distinguished by the allowable density of dwelling units per acre and corresponding housing types that can be accommodated within the density range. Commercial Districts: Per UDC 11-2B-1, the purpose of the commercial districts is to provide for the retail and service needs of the community in accord with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Four districts are designated which differ in the size and scale of commercial structures accommodated in the district, the scale and mix of allowed commercial uses, and the location of the district in proximity to streets and highways. 10. ANALYSIS a. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation: ~~ffiP@~u~n. +1...+ +1..~ !'~_c zvaca-Ica-avjuE£ac ~6 ~~e-R~£~~-$9~~-~e•Fc@~~ Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 10 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAi~ DATE OF MAY 20 2008 ' n et rr ~~ ~.lsd-1~1 ,o~..;„ tl, t t~.• lh-6'~ b}~t-tlln~~~l[i~ slmm c ' F 4;.. .,t;l 1 t .7 t t ~~ t mod-lied-ah~~ ~ r -_~ .._ .~..... t ~a •tl. e ~ u.~, ~t. vs-ca~ ma~acr ,.... . 1. Annexation & Zoning (AZ): Based on the policies and goals contained in the Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map designation of Mixed Use -Regional, Staff believes that the requested R-40 and C-C zoning districts are appropriate for this property. e..t;,, r tl. , ~ _ ' ear- Staff believes that access to the portion of the property proposed to be zoned C-C and all of the properties fronting Eagle Road/SH 55 south of the South Slough, should be provided from the south via a baclcage road that connects to the future E. River Valley Road and_ that across-access/ingress-egress easement should be provided to the properties to the north and south from the subiect property mat • ~ ~ Until the residential property to the south re-develops, the proposed commercial portion of the property will not be able to access E. River Valley Road, and should not use Eagle Road as access. , ~1.,..la s.,. _~ ' ~ . Staff is recommending approval of the annexation and zoning of 15 acres to C-C (see legal description & exhibit map for C-C zone m Exlubrt C.31. Staff is no;:i;=er supportive of the requested R-40 zoning designation for the eastern portion of the property proposed for multi-family residential use for the following reasons: The Comprehensive Plan future land use designation for this property of MU- R allows for residential densities of 3 to 40 units per acre. The applicant is proposing 204 residential units within a proposed R-40 zoning district, which allows for the property to develop within the desired densities stated in the Comprehensive Plan for this area. Further, Staff believes that amulti-family development would be appropriate and would contribute to the variety of uses in this area. For these reasons, Staff is recommending of approval of the annexation and zoning of 10.56 acres to R-40 (see legal description ~ exhibit map for R 40 zone in Exhibit C.2). Please see Exhibit D for a detailed analysis of the required facts and findings for an annexation & zoning request. The legal description submitted with the application (stamped on June 14, 2006 by Darin Holzhey, PLS) is accurate and meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and Idaho State Tax Commission. UDC 11-SB-3D2 provides the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council the authority to require a property owner to enter into a Development Agreement (DA) with the City of Meridian that may require some written commitment for all future uses. Because of the nature of the development and the high density zoning district proposed by the applicant, Staff believes that a DA is necessary to ensure that the site develops in a manor that is consistent with said plans. Staff has included a list of recommended DA provision below. If the Commission or Council feels additional development agreement Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 11 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20 2008 provisions are necessary, staff recommends a clear outline of the commitments of the developer being required. Development Agreement: A Development Agreement (DA) will be required as part of annexation of this property. Prior to annexation approval, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. The applicant shall contact the City Attorney, Bill Nary, at 888-4433, within g meters l~ of City Council approval to initiate this process. The DA shall include, at minimum, the following: a. A maximum of 204 multi-family residential units shall be allowed to be constructed on the site. b. A minimum 5,868 square foot clubhouse shall be constructed on the site, as proposed. c. At a minimum, amenities shall be constructed on the site as proposed on the site plan (i.e. clubhouse, water feature, swimming pool, walking trails, tot lot, gazebos, etc.). d. All multi-family structures shall comply with the architectural standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27E. Structures shall be constructed on the site in accordance with the elevations attached in Exhibit A. e. The site/structures shall comply with the Specific Use Standazds listed in UDC 11-4- 3-27 for multi-family developments. f. The applicant shall comply with the parking standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6 for multi-family developments as follows: for 1 bedroom units, there shall be two parking spaces with at least one in a covered carport or gazage; and for units with more than one bedroom, 2 parking spaces shall be provided, both in a covered carport or garage. No variance to this standard is granted. g. A legally binding document shall be recorded that states the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including, but not limited to, structures, parking, common azeas, and other development features, per UDC 11-4-3-27G. h. Access to this site shall be provided from E. River Valley Road and an emer~ency only access shall be provided from Allys Way. Access to Eagle Road is prohibited. i. The applicant shall dedicate right-of--way and construct Allys Way in accordance with ACHD standazds, in alignment with Allys Way north of the site, on the north side of Ustick Road, prior to release of occupancy of any structure on this site. j. The applicant shall construct (or have available) at least half the street section of E. River Valley Road (24 feet of pavement and 7-foot wide sidewalk) in accordance with ACHD standards, prior to release of occupancy of any structure on this site. k. All existing buildings on the site shall be removed prior to release of building permits for this development. 1. Twenty-six foot wide private streets shall be provided within the site in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. m. A 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along the future extension of E. River Valley Road, per UDC Table 11-2A-8. Landscaping shall be provided in said buffer in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C, Landscape Buffers along Streets. If NMID will not allow landscaping (i. e. trees) within their easement for the Downey Sublateral and if there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the street bu, ffer, the applicant shall provide an additional S foot wide strip for landscaping outside of the NMID easement, per UDC 11-3B-7CIb. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 12 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR TIC HEAIv~ATE OF MAY 20 2008 n. The Downey Sublateral easement along the southern boundary of the site shall either be relocated so that structures do not encroach within the easement OR the structures shall be relocated outside of the easement, prior to submittal of the first Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the parking and common areas. o. A 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along Allys Way, per UDC Table 11- 2A-8. Landscaping shall be provided in said buffer in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C, Landscape Buffers along Streets. p. Landscaping shall be provided on the site in accordance with the specific use standards for multi-family developments listed in UDC 11-4-3-27F. q. The applicant shall construct 6-foot tall vinyl fencing along the west property boundary and 6-foot tall chain link fencing along the north side of the property adjacent to the South Slough as depicted on the landscape plan. Temporary construction fencing is required to be installed where permanent fencing is not proposed, around the residential portion of the site prior to issuance of building permits to contain debris during construction. Fencing shall be constructed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. r. A minimum 5-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer is required adjacent to parking and vehicular use areas along the north boundary of the site and adjacent to the existing residence on the west boundary of the site, per UDC 11-3B-SC. Said buffer is required to be planted with one tree per 35 linear feet and shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative ground cover. If NMID will not allow trees within their easement for the South Slough, the applicant may apply for Alternative Compliance in accordance with UDC 11-SB-5. s. A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway and bridge over the South Slough shall be constructed on the site in accordance with the Parks Department conditions contained in Exhibit B and the standards in the Master Pathways Plan and UDC 11- 3A-8. t. With the first CZC application, include mitigation details for the 9 existing trees on the site, consisting of 120 caliper inches, proposed to be removed, in compliance with UDC 11-3B-10. Contact Elroy Huff, City Arborist, 888-3579 for more details. u. The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) for approval of all of the parking and common areas on the site prior to submittal of CZC's for structures. v. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance is required prior to issuance of a building permit for any and all of the proposed multi-family structures within this development. All structures must substantially comply with the building elevations submitted with this application (see Exhibit A), the architectural standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27E for multi-family developments, and conditions of approval and DA provisions listed in Exhibit B of this report. NOTE: A CZC application may include multiple/all multi-family structures within the develo ment w. A Certificate of ZOlling Compliance is required prior to issuance of a building permit for the commercial portion of the development Because the commercial orhon of the property is located adjacent to an entryway corridor (Eagle Road). the future structure(s) and site shall be subiect to the design standards fisted in UIDC 11-3A-19C. x. Development of the C-C zoned portion of the site shall not occur until such time as access is provided to/from E River Vallev Road or some other frontage/backage street• direct lot access to Eagle Road is prohibited Regency at River Valiey (revised) ~~ ~` I~INi@IIE~llll~~~~~~ ~ I~i!~Ili ~t~fl~ '~I PAGE 13 -~ a { ~t ~: ~ ~ r i4 y~ ~; ~ „' r ,~ ~ i :. t ~ s: ~' ~ ~ f ~ ~ i~ ~ i a ~i,: t + ~,+ ~~ ; ~,:,~' ~ ~, k~ r ~, :~; ~~: , ~t ,c t ` ~ ~ ,~~,, :~ {% ~~ i i CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 y. A backage road shall be constructed on the east side of the C-C zoned portion of the site and across-access/ingress-egress easement shall be provided to the properties to the north and south for an extension of the backage road and future access to E. River Valley Road. A copy said cross- access/ingress-egress easement shall be provided to the Planning Department prior to issuance of the issuance of a certificate of zoning compliance application for the first multi-family building. z. The Citv will not approve the ordinance for annexation of the requested parcel until one of three con 'n encies occurs• 1~ The KlelII .r Nnr*h Parral ilA is ei~r..n.~ ...~ tl. a. _.___ i a c ainexaiiir i -r inaIICe 1 21 The RnW for River Valley 5treP± i~ ap.ii,.atp~ t.. s r _ _ _ wi h a rPcc t Eagle Road. 31 The Rl7W fnr Al1PVC Wav/Rarnrrie Dn~a :~ a,.a:,,....,.a to ACra~ with airview Av -nue or stick Road Thi would a low emnorar`y __ the ea tern .mer encv a ce until snch Hm a fiver Va 1 v Street is con ~ ted Note: The City does not guarantee that any nfthv~o ~~s~d;r;nr~o ~.,.,, w occur within the one-veer time frame of the DA annrnv.,l Thn~a conditions may be modifaed through the DA sa.,dtft~~r;..H ~.~.,.,.a~~ 2. Conditional Use Permit (CUP): The applicant has submitted a site plan (stamped by Scott Stanfield on 8 3/12/08, included as Exhibit A.2). The site plan depicts 9multi-family residential structures consisting of a total of 204 residential units and a 5,868, square foot clubhouse for the portion of the site proposed to be zoned R-40. These units consist of 28 1- bedroom units consisting of 833 square feet (s.f.) each; 20 1-bedroom Executive units consisting of 871 s.f. each; 104 2-bedroom units consisting of 1,037 s.f. each; 28 2-bedroom Executive units consisting of 1,110 s.f. each; and 24 3-bedrom units consisting of 1,228 s.f. each (see floor plan ofmulti-family units in Exhibit A.10). The overall square footage of residential uses proposed for the property is 209,144 s.f. The applicant states that this project will not be phased but may take a couple of years to construct. Parking is provided on the site for the multi-family units as follows: There are 7 garage structures depicted on the plan that contain 6 parking spaces each for a total of 42 enclosed spaces; X3257 carport parking spaces are provided that allow for a total of ~-5299 covered spaces; and ~3109 open stalls are provided for a total of 408 parking stalls provided on the site (see covered parking analysis below for more information on compliance with UDC standards). .Per UDC 11-3C-5B, all off-street parking areas shall be provided with a substantial wheel restraint to prevent cars from encroaching upon abutting private and public property or overhanging beyond the designated parking stall dimensions. Wheel stops are not depicted on the site plan. The applicant must either install wheel stops for all parking adjacent to sidewalks or landscaping or the sidewalk or landscape area may be widened 2 feet to allow for vehicle overhang, and the stall length maybe reduced by 2 feet (from 19' to 17'). Bicycle parking is also required on the site as follows: 1 bicycle parking space is required for every 25 proposed vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof, per UDC 11-3C-6G. Because 408 parking stalls are proposed on the site, l6 bicycle spaces are required to be provided. As a provision of the DAI, the applicant shall submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 14 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA>~ DATE OF M AY 20, 2008 for approval of all of the parking and common areas on the site prior to submittal of CZC's for structures. Several amenities aze proposed on the site in compliance with UDC standazds (see amenities analysis below for more information). The property proposed to be zoned C-C is included on the site plan with a conceptual plan of how the property may develop in the future; however, no development of the 1.5 acre C-C property is proposed at this time. If the property is annezed, a backage road should be constructed along the east boundary of the commercial district, in compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-4B3. Further, across-access/ingress-egress easement should be provided to the properties to the north and south of the site. No development of this site should occur until the backage road is connected to River Valley Road. Per UDC 11-2A-2, Multi-family Developments require conditional use permit approval and must comply with the Specific Use Standazds listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 as follows: a. Setbacks: Buildings shall provide a minimum setback of 10 feet, unless a greater setback is otherwise required by the UDC. (UDC Table 11-2A-7 requires a greater setback of 15 feet in the reaz.) The building envelopes shown on the site plan meet the minimum setback requirements stated However, the structures shown along the south boundary encroach approximately I2 feet into the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District's easement for the Downey SublateraL (See discussion below under "ditches, canals, & laterals.') b. Service areas: On-site service azeas, outdoor storage azeas, waste storage, disposal facilities, and transformer or utility vaults shall be fully screened from view from any public street. The Applicant shall comply with this requirement. c. Private, usable open space: A minimum of 80 squaze feet of private, usable open space shall be provided for each unit. This requirement can be satisfied through porches, patios, decks, and/or enclosed yazds. Landscaping, entryway and other access ways shall not count towazd this requirement. Private usable open space is proposed for each unit that exceeds the minimum amount required by the UDC. (1 bedroom units contain 84 square feet of deck area, and 2 & 3 bedroom units contain 81 square feet of deck area.)(See floor plan attached in Exhibit A.10.) Staff is supportive of the proposed private, usable open space. d. Developments with 20 units or more shall provide the following: A property management office, a maintenance storage azea, a central mailbox location (including provisions for parcel mail), and a directory and map of the development at a convenient location. This development does contain more than 20 units and will comply with this requirement. A property management office and central mailbox location with parcel storage is proposed within the clubhouse (see clubhouse floor plan in Exhibit A.11). A directory and map of the development is shown at the entrance of the development on the landscape plan (see Exhibit A.3). The applicant states that the maintenance storage area will be located within garage building #1. Staff is supportive of the proposed amenities. e. Covered Parking: UDC 11-3C-6 requires that multifamily developments shall provide pazking as follows: for 1 bedroom units, there shall be two parking spaces with one in a covered carport or gazage; and for units with more than one bedroom, 2 pazking spaces shall be provided in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 481-bedroom units, which requires 48 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces. The site plan shows 156 units with more than 1 bedroom, which requires 312 covered spaces. A total of 408 stalls; 360 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces are required on the site. The Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 15 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 applicant has provided ~9S 299 covered spaces and 4~I09 uncovered spaces. A variance is requested for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required from 360 to X95 299. Staff is not supportive of the proposed parking variance. (see Variance analysis below) f. Common Open Space Design Requirements: UDC 11-4-3.27C requires a minimum of 250 square feet of outdoor common open space for each unit containing more than 500 square feet and up to 1,200 square feet of living area, and 350 square feet for each unit containing more than 1,200 square feet of living area. (The common open space shall be not less than 400 square feet in area, and shall have a minimum length and width dimension of 20 feet.) Based on the square footage of the proposed units, a total of 53, 400 square feet of common open space is required; 83, 312 square feet of open space is proposed on the site plan, which complies with this requirement. f. Amenities: UDC 11-4-3.27 requires that multi-family developments with 75 units or more provide 4 amenities with at least one from each category (i.e. quality of life, open space, or recreation). Further, for multi-family developments with more than 100 units, the decision making body shall require additional amenities commensurate to the size of the proposed development. Because 204 units are proposed with this development at least 4 amenities are required. Staff believes that the applicant more than complies with this requirement by providing the following qual~ing amenities.• 1) walking trails, 2) clubhouse, 3) water feature, 4) swimming pool, S) a putting green, 6) several gazebos, and 7) a tot lot. g. Elevations: Elevations are required to meet the architectural standards set forth in UDC 11-4-3-27E. The applicant is proposing 9 multi family structures, S of which consist of different elevations (they aren't all the same). The structures are all proposed to have brick veneer masonry, stucco, stone veneer, and fiberglass-reinforced asphalt shingles. All of the structures are 2-3 stories in height, have the same architectural design and appearance but are different in size based on how many units they contain. One single- story clubhouse structure is also proposed with the same construction materials as the multi family structures. No colors are listed for the structures on the elevations but the colored drawing the applicant submitted contained in Exhibit A.6 depict 4 d fferent colors on one structure. All of the structures within the development should have a mix of colors and materials as depicted on the colored elevation and architectural elevations contained in Exhibit A. The proposed elevations appear to comply with the architectural standards. If approved, full compliance with the elevation requirements cited in UDC 11- 4-3-27E, and the elevations submitted with the subject CUP, will be required with the future issuance of Certificate of Zoning Compliances on this site. h. Landscaping: Per UDC 11-4-3-27, all street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundation. The foundation landscaping shall meet the following standards: - The landscaped area shall be at least 3-feet wide; - For every 3 linear feet of foundation, an evergreen shrub having a minimum mature height of 24 inches shall be planted; and - Ground cover plants shall be planted in the remainder of the landscaped area. i. Maintenance and Ownership Responsibilities: Per UDC 11-4-3-27G, a legally binding document shall be recorded that states the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including, but not limited to, structures, parking, common areas, and other development features. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 16 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY Z0, 2008 Access: Access to the site is proposed from the future River Valley Road and an emer~encv only access to/from Allys Wav. r ,.+ea ,.,. ~,.,...:~_ _,--- r-- e u ~ i~x f e ..L.4 « / L.4 a r i r y ~ o ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~-However, Staff spoke with Matt Edmonds at ACRD and he stated that the applicant will be required to construct half the street section of E. River Valley Road abutting the site consisting of 24 feet of pavement and a 7-foot wide sidewalk (as proposed by the applicant). The applicant is proposing to dedicate and construct the wholeright-of--way for Allys Way on the eastern portion of the site. Matt did not think that an emergency access point to Allys (as required by City Staff) to/from the site would be a problem. Further, ACHD is requiring a road trust deposit for half of the construction cost of the bridge over the South Slough. Stub Streets: .The Fire Department is requesting that a stub street be provided from the site to Allys Way because of fire code requirements for the number of dwellings proposed;_the applicant has revised the site plan to include an emer~ency only access to Allys Wav which staff is supportive of. Staff has included a condition requiring construction of and access to Allys Way for this development. Ally's Way: The future alignment of Ally's Way, which exists north of the site, north of Ustick Road at the % mile, lies along the eastern boundary of the subject property. As part of the development of this site, the applicant will be required to dedicate right-of--way and construct Allys Way in accordance with ACRD standards. Further, staff has included a DA provision that an emer~ency only access be provided to/from Allys Way for this development. Ezisting ResidencesBuildings: The site currently contains some existing outbuildings that were associated with a previous residence. The remainder of the site consists of vacant land. All existing buildings shall be removed prior to release of building permits for this development. Fencing: The applicant is proposing to construct 6-foot tall vinyl fencing along the west property boundary and 6-foot tall chain link fencing along the north side of the property adjacent to the South Slough. Temporary construction fencing is required to be installed where permanent fencing is not proposed, around the residential portion of the site prior to issuance of building permits to contain debris during construction. Fencing shall be constructed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. Landscape Plan: The applicant submitted a conceptual landscape plan for the residential portion of the site dated ~3,~9-'~ 1/OS. The applicant should note the following and/or make revisions to the landscape/site plan as follows: • Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along the future extension of E. River Valley Road, as proposed. f NMID will not allow landscanin~ fi.e. trees) within their easement for the Downey Sublateral and if Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 17 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAi~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the street buffer the a~phcant shall provide an additional 5 foot wide strip for landscaping outside of the NMID easement per UDC 11-3B-7CIb• • Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along Allys Way; • Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 35-foot wide street buffer will be required along Eagle Road/SH 55, an entryway corridor (upon development of the commercial portion of the site when annexed). • If the property proposed to be annexed with a C-C zoning district is annexed, and at the time of CZC submittal there is a residence adjacent, a 25-foot wide buffer shall be provided along the east and/or south boundaries of the commercial site. • Per UDC 11-3B-8C, a 5-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer is required adjacent to parldng and vehicular use areas along the north boundary of the site and adjacent to the e~sting residence on the west boundary of the site. Said buffer is required to be planted with one tree per 351inear feet and shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative ground cover. If NMID will not allow trees within their easement for the South Slough, the applicant may apply for Alternative Compliance in accordance with UDC 11-SB-5. • A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway and bridge over the South Slough shall be provided on the site in accordance with the Parks Department conditions contained in Exhibit B and the standards in the Master Pathways Plan and UDC 11-3A-8. • With the first CZC application, include mitigation details for the 9 existing trees on the site, consisting of 120 caliper inches, proposed to be removed, in compliance with UDC 11-3B-10. Contact Ekoy Huff, City Arborist, 888-3579 for more details. • A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted with the CZC application per the requirements on the CZC checklist, the conditions of approval noted in Exhibit B, in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B. A detailed review of the final landscaping on this site will take place with the first Certificate of Zoning Compliances) application for the parking areas on this site. The aforementioned notes/revisions should be reflected on a revised plan submitted with the CZC application. Mitigation: The site plan depicts 9 existing trees, consisting of 120 caliper inches, on the site that are proposed to be removed upon development of the property. Per UDC 11-3B-10, mitigation is required for all existing trees 4-inch caliper or greater removed form the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of 100% replacement. Staff recommends that the applicant comply with the mitigation standards listed in UDC 11- 3B-1 OC. Multi-Use Pathway: The Parks Department has submitted the following analysis on the multi-use pathway required on this site: The Meridian Pathways Master Plan depicts a future public pathway along the north side of the South Slough (aka Finch Lateral or Finch Creek), which crosses the canal near the location of the future Pedestrian Bridge depicted on the site plan, continues south through the subject property and connects to the intersection of River Valley Road and Eagle Road. Regency at River Valley (revised) r' z PAGE 18 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC): Staff is requesting as a DA provision, that a CZC application be submitted for approval of all parking and common areas on the site prior to submittal of CZC's for structures on the site. Additionally, a Certificate of Zoning Compliance is required prior to issuance of a building permit for any and all of the proposed multi-family and/or commercial structures within this development. All structures must substantially comply with the building elevations submitted with this application (see Exhibit A), the architectural standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27E for multi-family developments, and conditions of approval and DA provisions listed in Exhibit B of this report. Additionally, any future structure(s) proposed on the commercial portion of the development is required to comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19C for structures located along entryway corridors. NOTE: A CZC application may include multiple/all multi family strictures within the development. Private Streets: The applicant is not proposing private streets within this development. For addressing purposes, the Fire Department and Public Works is requesting that private streets be provided within this development. The applicant shall submit a Private Street application to the City prior to the City Council meeting. Per UDC 11-3F- 4, all private streets shall be designed and constructed to the following standards: A. Design standards: 1. Easement: The private street shall be constructed on a perpetual ingress/egress easement or a single platted lot that provides access to all applicable properties. 2. Connection point: Where the point of connection of the private street is to a public street, the private street shall be approved by the Transportation Authority. 3. Emergency vehicle: The private street shall provide sufficient maneuvering area for emergency vehicles as determined and approved by the Meridian Fire Department. 4. Gates: Gates or other obstacles shall not be allowed. B. Construction standards: 1. For conversion of an existing facility to a private street at the direction of the Fire Marshall: a. All drive aisles shall be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed. b. If a curb exists next to the drive aisle, it shall be painted red. 2. For all other private streets: a. Roadway and storm drainage: The private street shall be constructed in accord with the roadway and storm drainage standards of the Transportation Authority or as approved by the City of Meridian based on plans submitted by a certified engineer. b. Street width: The private street shall be constructed within the easement and shall have a travel lane width of twenty-four (24) feet or twenty-six (26) feet as determined by the Fire Marshal relative to the height and size of the proposed structures that adjoin the private street. Due to the height of the proposed structures, the Fire Department is requiring a travel lane of 26 feet ~num~ The site elan submitted with the private street application reflects this reauiremen~ Regency at River Valley (revised) I~~(~ ~~ PAGE 20 - ~- ~~ ~: F ~ ~~ ~r ;! ~~ ;. ; ~' " ~~ i f ~~ h ~ ~; ~,. '4 ~l i I ~; 1 '' }, t >~ ~~ f f (; 4 r 17 t ; ~ t •~ 1 1:1 ~ ( J f. ' ~ I j~i t# ~. ~ +~ , ~ ' I ~~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 c. Sidewalks: Afive-foot (5') attached sidewalk or four-foot (4') detached sidewalk shall be provided on one side of the street in commercial districts. This requirement may be waived if the applicant can demonstrate that an alternative pedestrian path exists. Five foot wide detached sidewalks are proposed in front of the structures adjacent to parking. d. Fire lanes: All drive aisles shall be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed. In addition, if a curb exists next to the drive aisle, it shall be painted red. ~~-~~~At~'l~r~h~tw-i~~-Ply T T ~ lne.,ol,,.. . r+ a , 4 f , ~~~~-~1 3~ 4£-~- a- su +~,.-, . J~=~~ ~i+L o~tt~`=v'-an~cmvc-~nrii-rm~1~E~-C~PtfFYil~. s 1• +1, Y 1.1 l~ l+l,' F ti ~ ,r s e , v ~+'ET)~-~~iecc~rc+ncra..~~tu a~ ..>. .. ~*.e~e~#e-~e~~'ei~~e~ ~eF ADDZlCant withdrew request for temnorarv access at the Commission hearing on March 6 2008 4. Variance (VAR-OS-002): The applicant is requesting approval of a Variance to UDC Table 11-3C-6 for a reduction in the number of parking spaces required for multi-family dwellings in covered carports or garages. UDC 11-3C-6 requires multi-family dwellings with 1 Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 21 ~- ~ ~• ~ ~ ~, ;t !~j k t; !!! i r ' ~ t i` ~1 ' ~ ii ! ' .S t i a~ ~, ~ 1 , { p ~ ~, ii 3 '~ a f: p ~ ~ t q t 4 ~ i p3 ~ +' ~ S; ~ F~ y, ~ ~ f ,1 ~~ ',~;i '' ",'s i CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 bedroom to have 2 parking spaces per unit, 1 in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 48 -bedroom units, which requires 48 coveted spaces and 48 uncovered spaces. Multi-family dwellings with more than 1 bedroom are required to have 2 parking spaces per unit in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows IS6 units with mote than Ibedtoom, which requites 312 coveted spaces. A total of 360 coveted spaces and 48 uncovered spaces ate required on the site (408 total spaces requited). The applicant has provided ~9-S 299 covered spaces and ~3 I09 uncovered space (408 total spaces proposed). A variance is requested for a reduction in the number of coveted parking spaces required from 360 spaces to ~9-S 299 spaces. The reason for the variance is that an 80-foot wide Nampa Meridian Irrigation District (NMID) easement exists along the entire northern boundary of the site where the South Slough is located. NMID does not allow permanent structures to be built within their easement. In order to grant a variance, the City Council is required to make the following findings (per UDC 11-SB-4E): a. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district; b. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; and c. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. Staff has reviewed these findings and while Staff does not believe that granting the requested variance would be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare, Staff does find that granting the subject variance would allow a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district for multi-family developments. Further, Staff does not believe an undue hardship exists because of characteristics of the site in which the City should grant a variance. Staff believes that a residential structure(s) could be removed and the site redesigned in order to have additional room for the amount of UDC required covered parking spaces. For these reasons, Staff recommends that the requested variance for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required be denied and the required parking ' be provided on the site per UDC requirements. (Please see Exhibit D for a detailed analysis of the required facts and findings for a variance request.) 5. Private Street (PS-08-004)• The Applicant submitted a Private Street application on 4/18/08 repuestin~ approval of private streets within the development per reauirement of Staff for addressing purposes. The applicant is proposing 26-foot wide streets within the site, per requirement of the Fire Department Staff is supportive of the proposed private street apphcahon The proposed private streets shall be constructed in accordance with the standards fisted above per UDC 11 3F-4 b. Staff Recommendation: ;~ ~, ~ ,. .,. , f3a£~g p~~n, ~~a~~ ~ ~~-s~#ure-iecati6$-~ e: thP.se--seasons, a 1• ~ t ~ ^,.+ ~.,, ~o a 1. +r, r iua-vaz 't ~' "„a ^''+ '" "rte' a•`° Staff is generally supportive of the requested annexation & zoning of 10.56 acres to R-40, h••* ~~ ^^* ~ ~*' ~ rr and the request for annexation & zoning of 1.5 acres to C-C (see Analysis, Section 10, for more information). Further, staff is generally supportive of the CUP for amulti-family development, but is not supportive of a-r-e€ the requested Variance applications. Staff is supportive of the request for private street (PS-08- Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 22 I" : ;i:. .tire ' A". ' :.;A :'&? ^3 [[ ~: '.; ; : K. ~ ,: ~ ~ , .~:.. .'! Fy :: ~~:: X'. yyytt S'.i Ee j ;. ~~ S I ~ ~~ S. y. =; '.: L. ~:.i: ~ 't~.. 1~ ~ . i$~ 33~ ~p ; . :x.. 5L. ..t.~ 3 ~ ~ , . ~~` ~ 'ix ..$ ..1 ~ - 't~" n i ¢'k S 3 :6:. ' ~ .g Y . .DDS 1 F ~.i. ' I : ~:I :i ~ ~' 44{$ a t'~:;~' ~..~. ~i~ :p~s": ~ ~ . . ~ ~~~~~~ .s~ . y :.1~. . ~ ~i ll~. +~: ~'~' ~6. ~ ~~e ~ 7:~Pf ~ ~~. 3~~, . Z.J. ~}}:~ Sati i ~ ~ :.~ . 'r .. .: A4 y f~.~. CITY OF MERIDIAN PLEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 004) within the development Therefore, staff recommends approval of the subiect AZ, CUP and PS applications and denial of the subiect VAR application. See the Analysis m Section 10 and the Findings in Exhibit D of the staff report. and CUP request ThP Meridian City C'ounc'1 heard these items on April 22. Mav 20: and May_~Z, 2008 At the nubLic hearing on Mav 27 2008 the onnc'1 approved the sLbaect A7AZ and CLIP re~nest• 11. EXHIBITS A. Drawings 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map 2. Site Plan (dated: ~ 3/12/08 3. Landscape Plan (dated: ' ~'~ 1/08 4. Elevations for Building A 5. Elevations for Buildings B & C 6. Colored Elevations for Buildings B & C (24 unit structure) 7. Elevations for Buildings D, E, & F 8. Elevations for Buildings G & H 9. Elevations for Building I 10. Floor Plans of Multi-Family Units 11. Clubhouse Elevations & Floor Plan 12. Gazebo Elevations 13. Garage Buildings #1 & #7 -Elevations & Floor Plan 14. Garage Buildings #2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 -Elevations & Floor Plan B. Comments/Conditions of Approval 1. Planning Department (DRAFT) 2. Public Works Department 3. Fire Department 4. Police Department 5. Parks Department 6. Sanitary Service Company 7. Ada County Highway District ~ ~*'~^^~~~^~ C. Legal Descriptions & Exhibit Maps 1. Proposed Annexation Area 2. Proposed R-40 Boundary Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 23 , y 1 ^'~. ~. S 3' ~' L ~ ! ' ~ k tap s ~~ f C 4 i ' L ~ ' ' ~ F ,t~' ~i f :~.yr . } psi r ~, t 3 . '.-j 3 . . ++ S- ~F ~~ ~iF` .~ . x 8 ( n ~. 'S ~>. f } ^.} 7 ~` !:3: ~ ,'~ g ~~ i. :'.. [: i ~, "I, } { ~ Y: :.. r, : Z`. pr . y i '!~ :'1• 59 ~. t is~ .1 :` d.-s 3 t F ::i t ::. . ' } 4 3 ; :~ , < 1 ~. FF ~: '4. k ,i~ .r ij =3 I i . ` . 5 t ~ i ~ 4 ~ t F~ Fn. ' ~ j yl.~ 3 i '~~ s H 7 t }( ~:: ~Y CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 3. Proposed C-C Boundary D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code Regency at River Valley (revised) F 1~~ t~ e i; ~ ~ ~'I.. i !' t f ~' f~~'. r ,', 1 1'~ ~ fi. ~ ~~ r '; ~ ,. F ' e i, ~..' } li ~ f ,~ t `~ ~ E ` ~ ~ 3~ I E . ~ ~ . !t$ r' {{ 1 ' E ; I r~ ' ~ 1 -. a ~i j t . ~~ PAGE 24 j ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ,~ .t ~ t ~ ~ ;~ f i ~ ~r~ ~ ,t ~ r,~f 1 a, ~' ~- i _ s X } iSk 3 .~ . Y ~ ~ f 4 1 1 {~ ,~ t 7 1 ( ~ ff ~t i ~ ; I , ~ ~~ s: ~ ~. k, t E i r ~ ~~ wo t ? , ~ I.f V i I ,• ! t ~ t. I tf ~ o- ~ f t~ * ,7 4 ~~,~ -~ P _ t I~ ~ ~ i [ r f; ~ 1 ~ C J t ~; ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~' .~ ~ ,. ~ ~~- f .. s ~ 3~ .~, ~ ~ 3 ~, a ~ 1 f Nara r ~ . ~# ~. t . ~ ~ ~. . t I.II ~ ~ ~ ,. ~ , CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE H)G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 A. Drawings 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map ~_ ~( - -, _>~ s c I,~rI ~ '~I ~1C 1 ;1 ~ I~1C I __ w -~ F1-I~`~' ~ _ i a I z J W f' 4 l7 3 I~ 15 Rr 1\ Rr 81-~ ~f GG 1~ 4 Rl CT ~~, 7~ T Exhibit A IaJI' Site Rl N~ Y. C I r I' I I 91 • 1 4`P L ~y w 9~ > E !y Q', w ~%. ~ 3 "~ > ~. ~$ , 1~' < Z E Z __ ~1 f ' W 7 a- ~~ W 3Fr lE Zs <a ~' ~,' }; 1W I- - Z G 2D CITY OF MERIDIAN PLG DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 2. Site Plan (dated: Ab 3/12!08 RPGFJN/6YATR/9lER VAL.1 F+Y ~~ ~ A fOli/ P OE ®P/d a OE~I{,Mk ~3Cnf i6~. ~ 69~ ~u~. ~...~.~.-. _,...__,~r--~ _ __- irmc~ ~ ®r~°^v cn no`s-4s+~ a+n vq ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ f~ °j~i3N 1 ~ ~ ,~ ~ --- ®` ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ . I ' e w If .~ `- d ~:~ ~ ygWpl~ i II t } ` T f. +~ ~~ ~ rxaz~ earor.~ tt ~~ aitL*tN!'tp ~ ~y~f ~ n.w ~.w v~ ,WRw M{s. ~~~~~0. m.., rs ___--___-_._.T i I' Itb7~ I'. ".d~°.a ~ ,.w m ~ u+ eee~ csmv..a. ~~ ~ C~ ~ 1~®' ~ r _3 ~~o _..-_ F.~R?J G8T tBi'p[ VAlLT 1®i- ~~ ~.... ~~ mm mxw~ac®® ~~ s ~6ne wx mrv m uvaw a {~ °o °~°° •~ gg [e~ap.ars~r+on ~ "~~~ ~ gg i n~ .casu mn &~ pYi IGiiL { Ltl~~pa•®iKB/py®~yDa 9~sYLL<~IID DY R'~ ~W 33 p ~ imlilt ~ ' '~ ~ lia iMJ q V ~~~~ ~ n [ t YW ~6AR s q.®® l II I p (~1Y i l ~ tl 2 ®fL1Y Q1¢B WllL i4Q LL'MT ~~ 1 ~py~~ 9YREe FW [d~p® PIPS ~ ~~ ~ 'y ~ e®~a ,. ~,~ ~r~ 1 I ~~~:, ~`:Y~aF ~ - ~~ ma B3@8 - - ..v 6*'s~i Try:^a~~. • ~ ~ ~ 'i.FF ~ -_.. a . a a ( y ~ Ib ~ a Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 3. Landscape Plan (dated: ~/~A-'~ 1/08 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAG DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 4. Elevations for Building A -~. heae Eti:~anon ~~ muM ctcvcnou ~. s¢E arsanm, ~.~. `£ 2I; ~~- +' @g a ~, ~s O F ~Q 2 E~ ~~ Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HLG DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 5. Elevations for Buildings B & C Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 6. Colored Elevations for Buildings B & C (24 unit structure) Exhibit A .a a M ~_ .- CITY OF MERIDIAN PL DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HG DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 Elevations for Buildings D, E, & F Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 8. Elevations for Buildings G & H Exhibit A ~~ ~. mirk ... iFC1dT~~Td ttr.~ ar~~anaN nm~rrT _{~ ~z~ .~ ~ ~°yl ~_• ~~ i' ~~~ '~ ~~ a ~ 9 C 07 Z Q C7 ~~ ~~ ®a m CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~NG DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY ZQ 2008 9. Elevations for Building I Exhibit A =~ - ~~~~; 'y,=~~ ~_= ~~"s ~~ m CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 10. Floor Plans ofMulti-Family Units 3 @@DttDO(A PI1~N m~ 1 ~ "G~n miG ®~ y q*Oen l,J y~rl,~J Cw~RW mAmY I ~~ ~4 v 2 H~BRaOM PIAN 1 H~DRQOM PLAN L7 :I i p`~ 'I _ ty ~ ,~ .~ '~ ~.. I ~nnamaw _ ~ I .runes ~I w~r.c~, I j ~~ ~ ado I O I ~ ~ ~~na PaaN i o o~cunrr j 7 B~ORD06A PLl1N i I ~ - Exhibit A d m ~3~r B 'e ~~ '~' ~e CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE I~RING DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 11. Clubhouse Elevations & Floor Plan ~h ~ ~,~ ~ r; i arcxr ¢com~~: Fc+a nz~.n~~. m~~.e• I I ______r_____i r___________.~ I I I I I I I °oi I I -I I I ~______~kdkdk dk dkdkAkdkdkikdk ikdk~kdkilr______~ I ~ III II II II II II II II II II II II II II II III I =; I III II II II II II II II II II II II II II II III I I I ~ I I I 1 I I ® ® ' ~ - ImsPUr' I I 1 ___ I I __~ i I LJ U LJ COVetED PATIO --- I I I - I ~ I I ~ a' I I N/6fEpfA ~t I I i CEIJTR AL IdA¢Bp7(/ 1 i r_ _J ~__ _ ____va~ ~...° r._____~ I WW.WAT c..c ~ __, g I I -___ I I^ I I _ ____ _~_ ___ 8 _ _ ____ __r. _ pia I I s ~----- -- i APB trsN9 c.== I I ~ i____--_--1 =____~ I FFFg 1 I ~ j I i ptffAT ROOD I I 1 I I I _- I I I I i I I ~ I ____ ,. n I I ' I I I I I . L____l____J ~ puce '; I ~~ I I I I I I w _ TCr~ 'I T eellnu~r ~ I I`> crePn ~ I i i I . I I I 1 3 `'--- -----~ - L --- --- - I -- ~ -- ~~ --i -, I I ".t°~ I 1 -----~ I - I I I i °FFlCe I I ~ I I I I ~- ____ ~ I I I ~- ---------- r ____ ~ I 1 I saawn n I ~ a _ Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNYI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HbG DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 12. Gazebo Elevations ' ~O O rtouu rw. en .a- l~~ l - - _, ~. RGP IEF7 Elk-~_ ;~~~~ °-:~. ,` ~j - ~ .; fly'-Mf ElL~~611~ t~ ~ti? alYi7iC11 ~C~ - _z m.x~ ~t~ ~:~ a ~:~ ®~ a, a ~~6 ~~ 9 N 2 Q F u~ Exhibit A ~ ~ ~ . Y ~' ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? 1 _ f , ~ '~ # ! { ~ r ~ ' ; x ~ v ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~'_ ' ,. . l' ` t „ ~ , ' ~ - . ~ ~ c r i 1 ,E F I ~ ~ ~ t ~ i ~ ~ ~` i , is h ' ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~~' Ii ~ ,: ~o s ~ 'f ~ k 1 t~ ~ ~~ +f~ ' ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~. ~~;~ .~ ` i 4Y z ~ _ i e~ i ~' s s: a' ~ ~ 7 ~ r " t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f i ~ r~ ~~,;~ c 3 ~, ~i i ~ra t ~ ~~ j"~~ R ~ ~ . ~ ( a. s ~' t E}r ~' '~ ~;~1 ~ I~€ ;~ ~ j I ~. `'+ Ic} ~~ .~ jj - z, ~, :~ ~ £t Ij ~l k ~~ f S~ :~( ,' ~. ~ ' c - ~ i ~ ~` ~t ~ ~ f s ~ ~ ~~ Y1 ~ ~ 13 E ~ . ' ~ II N CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANI~~:T DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HL~ LNG DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 13. Garage Buildings #1 & #7 -Elevations & Floor Plan :' ~ Iwo Iyw uttnE:~.m~~ x!<o-~ea:an:,l. ~~ ~~-° F~. xT efs,+r~x ~. rX•. aTlfl.<n n .~-~. ~.a su *-a~- Exhibit A i~ t, ~e~ d s a a~ z 0 F m~ ~q ~~ ~ '777ti ~ ~J %%% 13 j ~ 1 ~ ~~ I ~ ~ (p { ~~ N i 17 ~~v II 2 _ 5 I ~ i~'.` t ,~ ~.~ I.} ! ~ f s( r d~.X ~{ ~;~~) ~6 ~ ~ ~ f ~~~ a~ I is ~' ~ ~' ~ ~ f i ~~ ' - g ~ ~' #~ f'` f I t , [ i c f ~j , L ~ I ~ I~~ ~ ~i r ~ I'. ~~ ~'_ ,s ~<. ~ t~. ,'. ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ i 7~ ' ~ 1 E ,~ j ~`~1 {~~d 'l ~ a~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 B. ~e~s/Conditions of Approval 1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT (DRAFT] 1.1 Annexation & Zoning Comments 1.1.1 The legal description submitted with the application (stamped on June 14, 2006 by Darin Holzhey, PLS) is accurate and meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and Idaho State Tax Commission 1.1.2 The applicant's request for annexation and zoning of 10.56 acres to R-40 is approved. The applicant's request for annexation and zoning of 1.5 acres to C-C is ~ approved. 1.1.3 Prior to annexation ordinance approval, the applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City. Said Development Agreement shall be signed within Fi-~en~s of the City Council's approval of this application. See section 10 above for analysis and comments regarding the Planning Department recommended Development Agreement provisions. 1.2 Site Specific Requirements -Conditional Use Permit 1.2.1 The site plan, labeled as Sheet 1 of 1, prepared by Mason & Stanfield, Inc., stamped by Scott Stanfield on X88 3/12/08, is ~ approved with the conditions stated herein. A~~~^~s ,.,.,. ,,,o e ~ n, ~ p. ~ .-, -~A-i'ul} sire; anP~-5~ c ~ • .. ~ .All comments of the accompanying Annexation & Zoning (AZ-08-003) application shall also be considered conditions of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP-08-004). 1.2.2 The landscape plan, prepared by Bach Homes, dated 1/08, is approved with the following modifications/notes: a. Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer is required along the future extension of E. River Valley Road. IfNMID will not allow landscaping (ue trees) within their easement for the Downey Sublateral and if there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the street buffer, the applicant shall provide an additional S-foot wide stria for landscaping outside of the NMID easement per UDC II-3B-7CIb; b. Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer is required along Allys Way; c. Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 35-foot wide street buffer will be required along Eagle Road/SH 55, an entryway corridor (upon development of the commercial portion of the site when annexed). d. A 25-foot wide buffer shall be provided along the east side of the C C zoned portion of the site adiacent to the multi-family development. and along the south side of the C C zoned portion of the site IF a residence e~sts at the time of CZC submittal e. Per UDC 11-3B-8C, a 5-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer is required adiacent to parkins and vehicular use areas along the north boundary of the site and adiacent to the enstms residence on the west boundary of the site Said buffer is reauired to be planted with one tree per 351inear feet and shrubs lawn or other vegetative around cover. f. Include mitigation details for the 9 existing trees on the site, consisting of 120 caliper inches, proposed to be removed, in compliance with UDC 11-3B-10. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAS~ARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEATE OF MAY 20, 2008 g. Per UDC 11-4-3-27, all street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundation. The foundation landscaping shall meet the following standards: • The landscaped area shall be at least 3-feet wide; • For every 3 linear feet of foundation, an evergreen shrub having a minimum mature height of 24 inches shall be planted; and • Ground cover plants shall be planted in the remainder of the landscaped azea. h. A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway and bridge over the South Slough shall be provided on the site in accordance with the Parks Department conditions contained below in Section 5, the standards in the Master Pathways Plan, and UDC 11-3A-8. Where the applicant has submitted a preliminary landscape plan and where staff has reviewed such plan, the landscaping shall be consistent with the preliminary plan with modifications as proposed by staff. The proceeding modifications and notes should be shown on a revised landscape plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application(s). 1.2.3 ~ewmplPt~Priv .. e.... •. r~~• ~: ,, f .. ~....,.,... •..w• ..z.• a ~ - n ~ nt lan + ~ n a ~ j ~ ~1.,. ,.~ ~t p ~ ~.,.~ ~., • '~ ~-cv '1 a_ Twenty-six foot wide private streets shall be constructed within this develo- pment in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. Further. the auplicant shall comply with all of the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4 for urivate streets 1.2.4 The applicant must either install wheel stops for all pazking adjacent to sidewalks or landscaping or the sidewalk or landscape area maybe widened 2 feet to allow for vehicle overhang, and the stall length may be reduced by 2 feet (from 19' to 17'), per UDC 11-3C-SB. 1.2.5 Bicycle parking is required to be provided on the site. Per UDC 11-3C-6G, 1 bicycle parking space is required for every 25 proposed vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof. 1.2.6 The applicant should submit a letter from Nampa Meridian Irrigation District ~~e documenting that they are amenable to relocating the Downey Sublateral and easement that currently e~sts along the southern boundary of the site. If 1VMID is not amenable to relocating the easement, the site plan shall be revised so that structures are located outside of the easement Additionally, if NMID will not allow landscaping (~, e. trees) within their easement and there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the required street buffer along River Palley Road, an additional 5 foot wide strip shall be provided for street buffer landscaping. 1.2.10 The applicant shall dedicate right-of--way and construct Allys Way in accordance with ACRD standazds, in alignment with Allys Way north of the site, on the north side of Ustick Road. A st+tb street driveway shall be constructed for emereency access only to/from the site to/from Allys Way that meets the Fire Department's turning radius requirements stated below in #3.3. 1.2.13 Per UDC 11-3A-6, all irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, and waterways being used as amenities, that intersect, cross or lie within the azea being subdivided shall be covered. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department prior to construction plan approval. If lateral users association approval can not be obtained, alternate plans will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ci DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 1.2.16 All signage for the site requires approval of a sign permit. All signage must comply with UDC 11-3D-8I and 11-3D-10, Table 2, for subdivision identification signs. 1.2.17 An underground, pressurized irrigation system shall be installed to all landscape areas within the development per the approved specifications and in accordance with UDC 11-3A-15 and MCC 9- 1-28. 2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2.1 Sanitary sewer service to this development is being proposed via extension of mains in North Eagle Rd. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; the applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Water service to this site is being proposed via extension of mains in N Eagle Road. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 2.3 The applicant shall provide a 20-foot common lot for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way. The common lot shall be covered with a blanket easement to the City of Meridian. 2.4 The applicant shall provide a 20-foot easement for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easements shall not be dedicated via a plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXI-IIBTT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. 2.5 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, asingle-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to issuance of building permits. 2.6 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to issuance of building permits. 2.7 All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, alternate plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Meridian City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. 2.8 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 2.9 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.10 Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed, drainage lots constructed, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 2.11 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to issuance of building permits 2.12 All development improvements, including but not limited to sewer, fencing, micro-paths, pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. 2.13 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to issuance of building permits 2.14 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.15 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.16 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.17 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.18 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.19 The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of the multifamily buildings is at least 1-foot above. 2.20 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACRD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.21 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.22 One hundred watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights shall be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior to commencing installations. 3. FIRE DEPARTMENT 3.1 Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Fire Department and water quality by the Meridian Water Department for bacteria testing. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 3.2 Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department. a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 %z" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle. b. 'The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it. c. Fire hydrant mazkers shall be provided per Public Works specifications. d. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on corners when spacing permits. e. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'. f. Fire hydrants shall be place 18" above finish grade. g. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements of the IFC Section 509.5. h. Show all proposed or existing hydrants for all new construction or additions to existing buildings within 1,000 feet of the project. 3.3 All common driveways shall be straight or have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside and shall have a clear driving surface which is 20' wide. a,,,.~..~,....,.,.~ ,.,,a,. 3.4 Operational fire hydrants, temporary or permanent street signs and access roads with an all weather surface are required before combustible construction is brought on site. 3.5 To increase emergency access to the site a minimum of two points of access will be required for any portion of the project, which serves more than 50 homes. The two entrances should be separated by no less than'/ the diagonal measurement of the full development. The applicant shall provide a stub street to the property from Allys Way at the east boundary of the site. See fire code 503.1.2 for multi-family developments over 200 units. The applicant has revised the site elan to include an emergency access to Allys Way: however, in order for this to meet the aforementioned reyuiremen~ a street connection needs to be provided either north to Ustick or through the CenterCal project to Fairview 3.6 Commercial and office occupancies will require afire-flow consistent with the International Fire Code to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed per Appendix D. 3.7 The fire department requests that any future signalization installed as the result of the development of this project be equipped with Opticom Sensors to ensure a safe and efficient response by fire and emergency medical service vehicles. This cost of this installation is to be borne by the developer. 3.8 Maintain a separation of 5' from the building to the dumpster enclosure. 3.9 Provide a Knox box entry system for the complex prior to occupancy. 3.10 The first digit of the Apartment/Office Suite shall correspond to the floor level. 3.11 The Fire Dept. has concerns about the addressing of the existing house and the address being visible from the street which the project is addressed off of. Please contact the Addressing Specialist at 898-5500 to address this concern prior to the public heazing. 3.12 Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet (122 m) from a hydrant on a fire appazatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the code official. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183). a. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m). Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PL?~NNIN~DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 b. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m). 3.13 All R-2 occupancies with 3 or more units shall be required to be fire sprinklered. 3.14 There shall be a fire hydrant within 100' of all fire department connections. 3.15 Buildings over 30' in height are required to have access roads in accordance with The International Fire Code Appendix D Section D105. The 26' wide roads shall be required to be a max of 30' from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The fire sprinkler system is required to be upgraded to a NFPA 13; contact the Fire Department. 3.16 Emergency response routes and fire lanes shall not be allowed to have speed bumps. 3.17 Pool chemicals shall be stored in compliance with the International Fire Code. 3.18 Multi-Family and Commercial projects shall be required to provide additional 60" wide access point to the building from the fire lane to allow for the movement of manual fire suppression equipment and gurney operations. The unobstructed breaks in the parking stalls shall be provided so that building access is provided in such a manner that the most remote part of a building can be reached with a length of 150' fire hose as measured around the perimeter of the building from the fire lane. Code complaint Handicap parking stalls may be included to assist meeting this requirement. Contact the Meridian Fire Department for details per IFC Section 504.1. 3.19 Private streets are required within the development for addressing purposes. 4. POLICE DEPARTMENT 4.1 The Police Department has no concerns related to the site design submitted with the application. 5. PARKS DEPARTMENT 5.1 Applicant shall construct the sidewalk along the north side of River Valley Street as a 10-foot wide, det~ed-multi-use pathway. A detached uathway is strongly preferred. pending approval by ACRD and N1VIID. Applicant shall cover the cost of replacing the detached pathway if necessary due to future irrigation facility maintenance. 5.2 Applicant shall construct - ," ~ ~+ ...;a~ .~,,,+; , ° -~~*'~..,°., +''-~„~'' ~- ~~+ °'.+;-~~ ~-~*...~~-~ ," the sidewalk along the west side of Ally's Wav as a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway. 5.3 Applicant shall construct a 5-foot wide minimum multi-use pathway through proiect connecting between River Valley Street and the pedestrian bridge. Applicant shall maintain the 5-foot path section and sign it for public access. 5.4 Applicant shall design a pedestrian crossing at the South Slough/Finch Lateral, secure necessary permits from the irrigation district and City floodplain administrator, prepare cost estimates, and provide funds in a trust for half the cost of constructing the crossing. 5.5 All pathways, except as noted in these conditions of approval, shall be built to the minimum standards published in the Comprehensive Parks & Recreation System Plan, pgs. 3-2 through 3-4, sections B and C. 5.6 An easement shall be provided for public access to and maintenance of the pathways. The City will not assume maintenance of the pathway until it connects from one major arterial road to another, unless otherwise agreed to by the Parks & Recreation Department. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNI~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 6. SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY ~~'~8~~6~-v 4~S~8 ~E~e-~E6i~ t a s ~ iz° i7 ~ v @$ ~-6 .,+ Q~-/44 ,4~U~ +~~~~ ~ . 6var-w c vc~F g-up cai~coxicuc~ 6~~ uSo$ t ~ ° ~ vn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~oi o xc a ci tia c xccsmg- r;4e .fie ...] o.a ~;+o «l ;~ e o e ., T~ +L.e ~;+e ..1.. ,.,] ...a,...~ aL_ ~l..r.-,... ~~~` BttYGtGl~t6 ~SCdi ' +l.e ..L..,«..o~ .] 1. 4 ~- - -F a o `` -' e-~~` zac o~sagc~ ~a i vv~v~ro itll tiC~ t1Y Y~ The site elan has been revised to comely with SSC reauirements. 7. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT In response to your request for comment on VAR-08-002, the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) Planning Review staff has reviewed the submitted application and site plan. It has been determined that there are no site specific requirements for you at this time due to the fact that: • This development will generate less than 10 vehicle trips per day (VTD). If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACRD Planning Review will review the site plan and may require improvements to the transportation system at that time. • Prior to final approval you will need to submit construction plans to the ACRD Development Review Department to insure compliance with the conditions identified above or for traffic impact fee assessment. This is a separate review process that requires direct plans submittal to the Development Review staff at the Highway District. • A traffic impact fee maybe assessed by ACRD and will be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Contact ACRD Planning & Development Services at 387-6170 for information regarding impact fees. 7.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval 7.1.1 Comply with requirements of ITD and City of Meridian for the Eagle Road (SH-55) frontage. Submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding said requirements prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Contact the District III Traffic Engineer at 334-8340. 7.1.2 In the right-of--way to be provided by the development to the south, construct the portion of River Valley Street abutting the site's south property line as a half street section with a minimum 24- feet of pavement, vertical curb and gutter on the north side, and a 3-foot gravel shoulder with a barrow ditch on the south side of the roadway. 7.1.3 Dedicate a minimum of 40-feet ofright-of--way from the east property line out to Eagle Road for the construction of River Valley Street prior to plans approval or issuance of a building permit. 7.1.4 Construct a 10-foot wide multiuse pathway along the south boundary of the site, inside a public sidewalk easement, north of and parallel to River Valley Street. Pipe the Stokesberry Lateral wherever it runs between the path and the River Valley Street right-of--way. If any portion of the Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 path lies within an irrigation easement, the sidewalk easement shall be recorded prior to the irrigation easement. 7.1.5 In the right-of--way to be provided by the development to the south, construct the portion of River Valley Street between the site's southwest corner and Eagle Road as an off-site street improvement, with a minimum of 24-feet of pavement and minimum 3-foot gravel shoulders and borrow ditches on either side. 7.1.6 Provide ACRD with a road trust deposit for one-eighth of the cost of installing a traffic signal and full intersection improvements at Eagle Road /River Valley Street. 7.1.7 Construct Allys Avenue intersecting River Valley Street at the east property line as a complete collector street section with vertical curb, gutter, and 7-foot attached concrete sidewalk. Extend the section from River Valley Street to the south easement line of South Slough irrigation ditch. Dedicate 64-feet ofright-of--way containing the constructed portion of Allys Avenue by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of--way dedication after receipt of all requested material. 7.1.8 Construct an emergency access on Allys Avenue approximately 140-feet north of River Valley Road. Install a restrictive device to allow emergency access only (i.e. gates, bollards, etc.) to be approved by the Fire Department 7.1.9 To accommodate the extension of Allys Avenue across the South Slough irrigation ditch, either: a. Provide ACRD with a road trust deposit for one-half of the cost of constructing the crossing of the South Slough irrigation ditch at the northern terminus of Ally's Avenue, or b. Construct a bridge over South Slough and extend Ally's Avenue as a full collector street section to the north bank. One-half the cost of the bridge construction may be used to offset the road trust deposit required in condition 6 for the signalization of the Eagle Road/River Valley Street intersection. 7.1.10 Locate the western driveway on River Valley Street no closer than 500-feet east the centerline of Eagle Road. Construct it as a curb return with minimum 15-foot radii, 46-feet wide (back-of curb to back-of--curb) with a center island, and paved its entire width and at least 30-feet into the site 7.1.11 Locate the eastern driveway on River Valley Street no closer than 175-feet from the western driveway or the intersection of Allys Avenue (near-edge to near-edge). Construct it as a curb return with minimum 15-foot radii, to be no greater than 36-feet wide (back-of curb to back-of- curb), and paved its entire width and at least 30-feet into the site. 7.1.12 Coordinate all germane design and timeline functions with 1'TD, ACRD, the adjacent property owners, and Meridian City, concerning the connection and alignment of River Valley Street to Eagle Road. 7.1.13 Provide access (and all necessary easements) to all adjacent parcels with frontage on Eagle Road to ensure them future access onto River Valley Street through the site. 7.1.14 Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. 7.2 Standard Conditions of Approval 7.2.1 Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of--way. 7.2.2 Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within any ACRD roadway or right-of--way. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAR~DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 7.2.3 All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 7.2.4 Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that maybe damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 7.2.5 Comply with the District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy. 7.2.6 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 7.2.7 All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 7.2.8 The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 7.2.9 Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7.2.10 Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #200, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 7.2.11 It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 7.2.12 No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 7.2.13 Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. i i +e,....,........ ,. .+ ;~ ,.:~t,,. ,.,,+ .. ~ +,. cu cc i~.,,.to n,...a~ t~..~ t_oo„ +..~.tea , .,,:t ,.~ .o., >,.._,,. ,u,. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNI~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 C. Legal Descriptions & Exhibit Maps 1. Proposed Annexation Area ~RD1~~^.SSl©11~at1„~,'~VC.r11V~E1gS, .~.t71VDr~'t1RYEY©BSt~ ~~~,~NV 314 Coln Sr~t~-r ~a~w~:L,lDnso a36os FC3R: >3aeh Builders J()B NO.: N1~1205 DATE; April 18, 20[}6 REVLSED ANNEXATTOI~T PR~3PER"I`7t DF,SC1tIPTI1JW i?~7' a :III I~Y R.~.C'URA 1lATA ~'~; tg4~ 4Sd-A~'A3 email: d6ot~he~asmsetog,us A parcel of land being a Partian ofthe SW 114 NW 1,F4 of Simon 4, `fowmsbip 3 North, Range 1 East, Baisc Meridiaat City of Meridian, Ada Ce+gnty Idaho, ~ sF-en+vo on that eortain Rs~ortl of Survey Nn. 6638, recoPded ~ Instriusent Ns, 144124418 oa Sept 28, 24tJ4 iA the Office of the Recorder of Ada County, Ideh®, by Anderean Survey(~rroupg Inc. for Brian Weiss, more ~rticut~ly de~ri6ed as folle~ws: C®mmencinS at the IVW eormer of said SW 1(4 NW U4, (North 1 a16 carper cen~~ to scetions ~ and 5), ,mod comer l S. 40° 36° 04"'W., s distance of 121.17 feet Exam the NW a®rxser of sapid 5t~tion 4; T`hCrtce S. 40° 36' 11" W., a distance of 776.26 feet, {$nrmcrly Saud), a1v~ fire wesoerly boundary ofsaid SW If4 NW 1l4 to the 1'a~IN7C Qp' BEGiNM11iG; Thence S. $~ a~4 49» ~., ~ chstance ®f74.44 (Sormerly F~ ~ ~ po~mR ~ the 1y ot'that certain Warrartty D«;d r~rded as Inshvrbent No.95418434 in the Office of the ~Recotrler of lA±day G~ory~} ytyp, Idatsc~, said point nsonu~tented with a fwamd ~/S u~eh di~arrteter iron pin BiJtii la~8.8 ~~517 ~LO~ !J 1"T~, Thence along the bound~y of mid Record of Survey No. 6638 ~ fallowing courses and. dish: Tizeace costinaing S. $9° 23' 49" E., a distance of 230.(30 feet, (formerly East), to a foumi Sf8 inch di iron pin marked `°ASG 1xLS 7314'°: Thence N. 4t3° 36' 11'" E., a distance of 215.48 f+ee4, (forn-erly Noalb 218.45 feet), tv a p®iat on the southerly boundary of th~1 certain a of Heirs', Case No. Sl' ffi 031N}524M. recorded as t 1Va.1040474?9 in the Office of die ~ecflrdar of Ada County, Idaho, said point Wi S. QO° 36' 11'" ~JA a ~ of 40.QI? feet Wltll a faiuid 5/8 mcli d78ffietCT 11'i5n pm a-arkctl "ASf~i PLS 7314°e continuing along the bcaundary of said Record of Survey No. 6635 anal along the ~utherly of said t No.1~447079 the followntg caaonses and distances: Thence N, 54°' 26' 1 I" E., a dish of i7o43 (foroaealy N. 83° SQ'E.) to a poitri; Exhibit C F { ~ ~~ is ~t 77~ L~ ;:) a }:'u >; 4 .. °i fi ': #,%; f, ~: f . x; ;~i ., CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAR~DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 MA.SftN & Sr~~tt ftrN'. FeOF,F:~(1;t"sl1,E~n~sRS, laxD~'GrRL~'Yd1~,.~ Ftan't+~s t*a~t 2 oi3 B~~ ~m'lders. Multi ~~sraBy-Ni,° 12{15'+~Surv~ylNe,~als'+Revis~i Ae~ex.dae Thence S. 65° 18' 49" E., s distaa~e of 264.(10 feet,(fomaealy S. 6ta° S6'>;.), tea a paainl, sad point refertd S. 45° 2b' 11" W`., a distance of 3{1.00 feet with a fostnd 5;~!# inch diameter icon pia ~~ "A5G 1$LS a314»; Thence S. 34° 4$' 49" E., a distance of 22?.7[f fcet,(fom~erly S. 35° 2~'E.)~ to a point, ~d drat refaced S. 86° 44' 15" W., a distance taf 11.50 feet with a found 5f~' inch diasneier non isin anaal$ed "ASCa Pi..fi ?314";, Thence S. 71 °' i 6' 49" E,., a di of l 32.001'eot,{foaffierly S. 71 ° SS'E. }, to a feaurad 518 inch dit~raeter iaeara lain anarked '°ASG PLS 7314": Thence 5. $S° 33' 43" E., a distance caf 17490 feel,{fota~~aly s. Sti° 1 fl'P1.}, to a point, said point r~:f~rencedp ~~s~±27T7° 42+~'y213" VV., r~ distarts~ of 30.Of! fc~l wit3i a fo~-d 51~ ink tliazrs~tnr ire;n pin cs Pln~ [314'a, Thcnec S. 40° 43' 49" E., a distance of364.9R feet, {foa~ecly S. 41° 20'E., a dunce ®f 366.30 Feet), to a Found 513 inch imn pin anarked "ASG PLS 7314": Thence S. 7a° 58' 49" ~., a distance of 99.29 f,(foan-erlp ~. 73° 35'E., a distance ®f 518.34 feet), tea a point on the easterly boundary of said S'aV 1141~V 1148 said point. witnessed S. 0~° 40'48" W., a distaan~ of 2.0.00 fc~t wilh a fecund 518 inch er icon f~ marked "ASG PLS 7'3 t 4"~ Thence leaving the soatttterly boundaay of said l+lo. 104(14?0?9 and con~in a1on~ the ~ ®f said Ptecord eaf Survey N®. +6638} S. 00® 40'48" ~., a distance of 1 I l .try fee#,{farmcarly South a dista~e oft 12.$6 feei~, along the easterly brrundary of said 511 I14 NW 1!4 to the 5E earner of said SW 1141V~V 114, {c~eriier west illb rcarrsnexl, said ceaaaer mcs~aeai~ with a fotimd 518 inch diameter i~renn pin marked "PAT PIrS 434"A"; Thence N. 89° 45' 21" iIV,, a distat~ of 978.2? feet,{formerly a+'est a distance of979.24 feet), along the sautheriy boundary of ~.id ~ i/41~'VV 114 to a found 518 inch iror- pica nxaaked "ASfl PI.S 7314" which lsears S. 89° 45' 21" E~ a distance of 350.(}(1 fcet from the SW coma of skid S'VV 114 NqJ' 114,E 114 cornea ctrmmon ttr scu;tions 4 and 5); Thence 1V. Op° 3b' 11" E., a distar-e~ of 181).QO feet, {fBrrnealy Nmth). tg a found 518 inch diameter ia+~tr pin narked "ASG PLfi ?314"; Thence N. 89® 45' 21" QJ., a distance of 49.86 f~t,{feirmealy 'lfd~i), to a point on the easterly boundary of (bat Wat~trty Decd t~c+rde~d as No. ?74180b in the 13~ce of the Recorder erf Adra Gount~r, Idaho, said mint tr~rauniented with. a found 5111 inch diameter irean pin ~ "ASt3 PLS 7314", Ther-ee 1'J. 00° 3ti' 11" ~., a distance ®f 145.00 feet,., {formerly ~larth), along the easterly bouti of said lnsirta~aaent Ntr. 7741806 to a point, said pout evi S. 00° 36' 11" VI'., a distance of 1.04 fart with a found S/8 inch diasnea[er it'~n pin marlted "ASG PLS 731 4"; Exhibit C CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEATS OF MAY 20, 2008 ~BA~- vY !~-~ Z~J ~~~~ Exhibit C CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNI~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 e_.._ _ _. ._ _ .._.___ a.,' ~„ .: ~,, ~~ .,; jgk d$1 R61 r'9b r,~rcc~ q €d~rt5 ~9d .~. _. _ _ . € E'~Fa"ll'E ~T~ ~ ~Ed4RSVfID~ '! L~TAIV[~ i s 13,'x' ~ '2F'12"9,t ' _w~ { ~~~. 13 SEfs ~4'3s'r~t' ~Y +~ r5 '~' c~''~' ~~ _.- 141 a. Y~`a"_~~`44 SD.~3 ~ ~5?F~~ Ci^ -s ~ - E~Ir~?UPd"N~- ~ r, ~ + ~ ' ~~;~ spa "~ 1 fA. '~~ b ~ ~ ~ +~A -m~~~ f~ ~ q S '~'' fi, '~... L~L~ ?"~~a"01R4 S"~a4~1~~ ~~GG$$ 1:~3` ~L RtEtrarr ~d7a .+ -- a a s. ~.~{,~ s. _..__..._ s a ~_,_~ 7 ~ ~~ 4P... `€~4i L'~ 4'~?' ~,, ~*~ ~r Exhibit C k.+IN~Id!®tBl~ criC ~oaa>'fID' bra e~ raatar~,.taar~n" v:u~d 5~~ 1a ~'~, ,ears ~,-~ ~,~PYcr~a~ ~e~ "ASG ~L~ 7~'+~~P+ caNe>:ss olh~rw~~ rxcRe~d Wids'zES~ e®Tt'~r ~cf~,r~ncE- r~+rrtta,r;~rrr ~!'.~'ni~Tw 1d a ~ ;~ 1 i~ ~, ~: ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ,~ ; ~ ' , ~ ~ 1 I ~ i ~1' t ~ ~; r ~ ~ I n I, rc r, - : i s i s ~ t ii" $~ ~ i E ~ , ;~ + ~, r ~ ~~ i , ~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ , t ~~ ~ f , 77 ~ ~ , I `, ~ ~ ~ ~°s. ~ ~ ' Si~ ~ , 1 ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ i ~i 7. :i r s , ~ ~ ~ ~ i } ~ ri i I ~~ i e ~. I ~ ~ 'I , ~' j ~ q ~ t ~ i a ~ i C ~ (~ ~ ti + (~ ~1 l ~ +: 7 ' ~ ~ i~ ~. .. o i f p p . ~ . ~; s I , u { ~ f.,. ~ F h~ ; S ~ t ~` f ~ f 1 ~ I ~ ~ i t P ~ ) 1 E d ~_ t a ~ i.?~ 3 ~ g ~ I ~ _ ~ ~ <~ 'ti i~ ~( ~ ~ I F ~ - E ;' ~ REViE1A1 P /i1. ~Y ~! Z ~ ~v'~ - 2~ 5~o~r.' 3 °'-1~,`" 4c1~~t1fS9AtS PUBLIC W°~b~i6S Cr€PY: ~S~'l e a ~' ~ ots~.w.e ~,wua+r4Ya CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 2. Proposed C-C Boundary Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors and Planners `- ® ~ ~ 31413adiola St. Caldwell, ID 83605 ~~ ~~~~~ ~ jnG Ph (208) 454-0256 Fax (208) 454-0979 e-mail: dholzhev~mseng.us FOR: Bach Builders JOBNO.: NV1205 DATE: June 8, 2006 ANNEXATION PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1 A parcel of land being a portion of the SW 1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho, as shown on that certain Record of Survey No. 6538, recorded as Instrument No. 104124018 on Sept. 28, 2004 in the Office of the Recorder of Ada County, Idaho, by Anderson Survey Gaoup, Inc. for Brian Weiss, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the SWcorner ofsaid SWl/4 NWl/4, (9V1/4 comer of Section 4), said corner monumented with a brass disk; Thence N. 00° 36' 08" E. a distance of 543.94 feet along the westerly boundary of said SWl/4 NWl/4 to the POINT OF BEGINNING,; Thence S. 89° 23' S2" E. a distance of 70.00 fed per~ndicular to said westerly bomidary to a point monumented with a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence contin "ng S. 89° 23' S2" E, a distance of 230.00 feet to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence S. 00° 33' S4" W. a distance of 217.06 feet to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence, N. 89° 45' 23" W. a distance of 230.15 feet parallel with the southerly boundary of said SWll4 NWl/4 to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence, N. 89° 45' 23" W. a distance of 70.00 fed parallel with the southerly boundary of said SWl/4 NW 1/4 to a found 5!8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence N. 00° 36' 11" E a distance of 218.94 feet parallel with the westerly boundary of said SWl/4 NWl/4 to the FOINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 1.50 acres more or less. Also, this parcel is subject to all easeme~ andrights-of--way of record or implied. Exhibit C ~,~ ~ ~ - - ~y- r .~ t ~ 9 ~ { .d, ~~ i i ~. N ~ ~ 9 ~ ~~ t ~ j~ E ~: ,-~~~ ti f S 1 ~ h~ s a i ~ 1 y 1 ~. ,~ e ~ t a " ' # 4 ~ t y ., I rs L ~ ~ ~ I, I ' i ' ' t ~ ~ ~ ~ __k ' 9. sF~, k ~ ~ ~. (~ 17 ~ ~ r ' ~[ 3 7 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~, I ~ ~ r ~ f ~. ~ t 1 1 ~ S, i ~n~ ` s '~ ~ i y L g S p 1. , 4~ i~ 1 i 1 ,+: ~~; t Q . ~ ~ E; i~ -: ~ C ~ t: 4 ., i.. ~ I ~ f~ ~ s ~ 'i ~i.~t ~ a ~ ! ~ ~` :i ~ `{4Li t ~~ I ~ ~ $ j ~ E 1 t ~ f ~ i j ~ ~ ~ , :~ d ~t - , ~~ ~ s :)" a i ~ 1t , ° ~ E , ~' i ~ ~ ry ~ ~ . CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAI~DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 ~~~f~ d _s: s~ ~ t , a rt._,~~~~T b ~'j ~ ~ 4 ~=~ ~,E r It 1!P p.-~ I ,_ ~~~,~i .FL ] ~ °9~ C~ ww'-Yi - ~s ; fia w~a°~, - '~ r_`~t Ai~i L=~ 735a IY w , ~ t3 '~?f~ ~~,~ 9 -x. ~ ii w ,,_-, ,~ V. J i Cv'~ i f _r Q __ ~ °g~ - _ a U"~ _ I ° ~. Cll ~,~~ , a_i r~ 1 . '~r°`~{ ,'tis [ Y" r i . _6 "' °«r~P-, t=7. r ~ l:Jl I F:t cJG~tt5t3ss _ _ r~I C i i , U i ~ ~ L t I ~J1~`~1`° .,,~~, I __ a - °~ [7 , r LW~ ~t~~#~ Ci SP<4At'C 1, c@335 _4"E rr1.r~ ~ I j(( I~ `~1--- 1l° ~J . i I° ~~f.fl ~ ~ °L~`1~~~iY~'P' ~. pi ~~ ~i r~,~ °~_ ~Yi -- -_- _ ----°---~-__---- 'R° lta °x. ~'=.~ _, A°++a L's 331 ~`~ ::I'~ iG1~ 1~1~1LC~~d~ ~. ~ °~ t.,. e~araa~ ~.~ ~a s ~;° ~'' ~ i.iQar ~~ ~' ;~~ ai !~i jai a a~ ~* >ti Exhibit C ~ ' '' ~ i ;, f ~; ~ : ~; ~ ° I r ~ ~, ~ !j ( F z ~ , ~ ~ f ~ ~ ( 1' I ~ t ~c t ~i ~ K i; f ~ r ~. ~ ~ t a ' ' ~ ~ ~ , I, ~ ~ , ~ it s `i I ~ ~ i t r ! ~, is ~° ' I ~ ° ~ ;:~ '~ `' ~; I~ I ~~':i S v. ~ ~ h f Q -, ~' ° l; ~# I f ~. ~ ~ , ? i? I ° 3 t CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNINGARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARIATE OF MAY 20, 2008 3. Proposed R-40 Boundary C~ a ~ ~ ~` ~rafessional Engineers, Land Surveyors arrd Manners Cam: ~- ~,. ' ~r 314 l3atli+ota St. Caldwetf, A®®36Q5 c~ ~7~QJ 1-~~ ~, c~IS} a5a-~~ss pax ~~o~~ .~~~-os7~ e-marl: 4II7t}IZI1 ~ Tj:'sL'Yi ~.t~S FRAPIRTY DESCIZh~'I~UIV PAItCF,L Z ~'~~ r'! parcel of land being a portirra crf the SW 114 lJl~ 114 of Seeiion 4q Township 3 North, Range 1 T Boise 1Meridiaa, City of lvl+~ridiarr, Ada Coumy Idaho, as shown on that certain Record of Survey No, 6638, recorded as lnstrumeat No. 104124018 oa Sept. 28, 2004 in the Qffiec of the Recorder of Ada County,ldaho, by Anderson Srrrvey Ciraup~ Ina. for Brian Weiss, amore particarlarly descrr°bed as follows: Commencing at the Std corrYer of said S~k+114 NR°1l4, L W l/4 corner of Section 4), said corner rrroaranented with a brag disk; Thence S. ~° 45' 23" E. a distance of 350.f1 I fit to the PO]~+I'I' ®F BEG1I~TIITIhoTC, said paint aaoaurncated with a found S/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence 1V. 00° 36' 08" E. a distance cif 180.00 feet pam.11e1 with the westerly bouaslary of mid SW l1'4 NW 114 to a found 518-ira~h diameter iron pin; Thence N. 89° 45' 23" '1V. a distance of 49.86 fact parallel with the southerly lr®undary of said S'fN1/4 NW l/4 t®a found 51&inch diarrteter iron pin; Thence 1V. (30° 36' 08" E. a distance of 145.00 feet parallel with fire westerly boundary of said SW 114 NW h 14 to n found 518-inch d'rarneter iron pin; N. 00° 33' S4" ~. a d' of ~ 17.06 feet to a fi3m~d 518`ia~h dinaaefer iron Pia; Tlr~rce N. 00° 38' 08" ), a distance ®f 218,08 feet parallel ~r'rth thae westerly boundary of raid S W 114 NR' 114 to a paint fleet falls in flee Swath S1ou~lr; Thence along said South Slougl- the following and distances; Thanes N..84° 26' 08" 1r. a distance of 17.43 feet to a paint; Thence S. 66° 18' S2" R a distance of 264.00 felt to a point; Thence S. 34° 48' S2" E. a disiraaee of 227.70 fit to a point; Tlrcrrce S. 71 ° l6' S2" E. s dish of 132>00 feet to a point; Treace S. RS° 33 ` 52°' E. a distarce of 174.91 feet to a point; Tiaeace S. 40° 43 n 52" E. a distance of 364.98 feet to a point; Exhibit C ~''r~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 MASON & STAi~tF'IEl.E1a lv'c. ~°tiaRb'E'IrH~1'1,5„ ~a"a`G!A`E~,~e~ PL~iEi tL~ Ps~e 2 Thee S. 7~a 3~' S2~ . ~ di~+ce of X9.25 feet to a paint oar the e~sterl~ t~oundary ~f said SW 1P4 Nlf4~ Thence lea`s said sl4u,~h ~. pt3p 37' S2" W. a dist~ce of 111.lib f+~t alnng said easterly ~~~ #© the ~~ Corner @f said SVi-1f4 I~TW Df4, said c€~rner mc-mt~tetl with a ~vimd 5f~-ineh di~neter itora pin, Thence 3ti1. $~° 45' 23" ilhl. a d' of ~178.3~ feet ~, thc~ scttaherly b~daay +~f said S W l e'4 NW lf4 to tl^,e PINT 4F I~EGIlVII~IN~. This tercel coins 10.56 acres more tsr lees. A.isn, this parcel is subject to a311 eas~~ents and rights~f-,~,y of retard gar iffiplied. Exhibit C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ z ~~ ~~ ~ i ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P ~ 1; ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ li 1 ~~g ,; ~ + ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ,= f ~ , n ~r i t < 3 ~ ~ ~ ~: I ~ ~ I ' ' .~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~~ i ~ ,; ~ ~ ~ ~ r ' tE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ' b ~ ~ ' 1 ` ~ ~ I ~ i ~ ,j~ ~ ~ i F ~ " . t ~' F~ ~ ~~ i Y, Y t ~ 2 ~ i d.~ i ~i ~ ~~ ~ t t 4 r ~, ~ ~~ ~ f r r ~~ '~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ }t! I~ ' ~ }p ` A ~ r ~i ~~ i ~ j n ' i , t i CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 ~y~ ~ K 1r93riR' 1=~Au a ~ ~ ~°ti'` ~ p ~ `~- ° 1 - _ r _~ 1 ~ ~ ~ k ,~' ~ via a7 .A ' .y ~ ,~~~ ~ , °~.''~ a341r ~'m~ r, J.a a~ ~ I ~/p.'} " a l .a Fhb E ! 5 ~~yy 1t~ s es pt qWy ~ _ ~- ., . e m ~ ~"~ aH3 ~f ~'~ ~ - _ ~~~ ~~ I fi Y H ~ ~ i ~y ~W'i~.lM f _ m~: e Jf ~aa C a ~: '°~' ~ Ip w r_ar rma _.~ . _ ':a yyd,- ..m .s'vN j£'' 1 ~~ aaw sra ~ __`°- __- ,. -- -- --_~ -- -=~~ ~ -- - -- ° <'--- . - - - ~.. -- - r3 aur _ _ _ r ~+as'~ e eH d,.. _ _ _ s ~ im .er tug ItP #' r~l~v'4"! : ~'ff `~'~_ a ~~ s~ m m ear u m ~ P~RCft 9 tl +ra ~~v ~~ JAN 2 5 1~4CH ~t#J~LL'~~RS Pwr~~x, ~ ~srr r~t~at®iAw Fu~uc ,~ nm ~rraws 4~1~RKS q~PT. ~Lrr~jr~sa~ ,pwea ~ aiditt&latJY ~ -T~ _ c"~SC.7t1 ~j,/ dlrPi~rprs ~+~ A6Ta~ ~.~. t 17A C- .Ni 04~l~+OA Exhibit C CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code 1. Annexation & Zoning Findings: Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone, the Council shall make the following findings: a. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The applicant is proposing to annex and zone the eastern 10.56 acre portion of the property R-40 and the western 1.5 acre portion of the property adjacent to Eagle Road, C- C. The City Council finds that the proposed zoning map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. , (see Analysis, Section 10 of this report for more information). Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals, Section 8, of the Staff Report. b. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds that future development of the residential portion of this property will comply with the established regulations and purpose statement of the R-40 zone and future development of the C-C portion will comply with the purpose statement of the commercial districts. c. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds that the proposed zoning map amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. Staff recommends that the Commission and Council rely on any oral or written testimony that may be provided when determining this fmding. d. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited to, school districts; and, The City Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment should not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. e. The annexation is in the best of interest of the City (LTDC 11-5B-3.E). The City Council finds that the annexation of the 10.56 acre portion of this property with an R-40 zoning designation and the 1.5 acre portion of this property with a C- C zoning designation is in the best interest of the City. c~..ec a,.,.- ,-... ~ ,a ..~,..,.....,. , e 2. Conditional Use Permit Findings: The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed conditional use in terms of the following, and may approve a conditional use permit if they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to Exhibit D CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 establish: a. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. The City Council finds that if the site is designed according to the conditions of approval in Exhibit B, the site will be large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet the dimensional and development regulations of the R-40 district and the multi-family Specific Use Standards. Note: The applicant is requesting a variance to the covered parking standards in UDC 11-3C-6. However, Staff believes that if a structure(s) is removed, the applicant will be able to comply with the required parking standards. b. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accord with the requirements of this Title. The City Council finds that the proposed multi-family residential use in the proposed R- 40 zone will be harmonious with and meet the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. c. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. The City Council finds that the proposed multi-family development is compatible with other uses in the general area and will not adversely change the character of the area. d. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. The City Council finds that the proposed development should not adversely affect other property in the vicinity if the applicant complies with all conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B of this staff report and constructs all improvements and operates the use in accordance with the UDC standards. e. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. The City Council fmds that sanitary sewer, domestic water and irrigation can be made available to the subject property. Please refer to comments prepared by the Public Works Department, Fire Department and other agencies. f. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. The City Council fmds that the applicant will pay to extend the sanitary sewer and water mains into the site. No additional capital facility costs are expected from the City. The applicant and/or future property owners will be required to pay highway impact fees. g. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Exhibit D CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAIZ~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 The City Council fords that the proposed development will not involve uses that will create nuisances that would be detrimental to the general welfare of the surrounding area. Staff recognizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase with the approval of this development; however, Staff does not believe that the amount generated will be detrimental to the general welfare of the public. h. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. The City Council finds that the proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any natural feature(s) of major importance. Staff recommends that the Commission and Council reference any public testimony that may be presented to determine whether or not the proposed development may destroy or damage a natural or scenic feature(s) of major importance of which staff is unaware. Tl-., ~l-. .ll ....~ ..-. ..+ .. ..l-~ .. ..l .. .:1.. .. th + ' + ~7. 77 a 7 4t~ff firia~ *~~+ + ba i,e •- °a +~--~ ~ >;.,..1o n,.,,aieu cc a , t ~~ ~ ~ .;•L, T Tll!' 1 1 2u Y Y Y y A l.' 1. 7.'L,'4 1, ,]' tl + ~ L,' 1+ /Q,,., A.,.,.1,,..:.. Q~ r ~ r rr ~ b bu 7 lafvi,m 7/1 F , ...F . ~: _ 1 i s• s ~ , ..'.'.`t,t,.... ~.. v va ~aiv ouvj w . brae - ..1.' -.a.... 1,....a~l-; 1. ~F 1. + ti .c..,. •+ r ~ 9i~e- F F~FT~6}}i~iF9t}~~l~ t ~ ~ ~ }} ~T~~ i , ei el~ ££ ~Ee~ F ~ , -r. 1. Tl.., ~l...ll ....+ L....7..M' t +1, e$ta~ o c hl• 1. 1N. ~F a a~ ca - ° 4- .l 14 rr7 .m c ca ~ n a s:ca, . sct cc ,TaaQ rrcaasr~ C+.,~Fl.o1;0 ~ +L,.,~ :~ :~~ 9~ ~ 9~i~ac6cST omT a t m a p c " +sro-cac~zim9~1943 ~5~6~ 9fi~6-9i~@'~'z P S oarimToi 9 2~' E~iSt~62S iou a ouc saa g voayT -~ ie~' T~x ~ " ~ 4L..,4 +' `"' " axo gz ~pe2 9 9 o'c~caco ovcm-ccc xcvv cs .~cat~en~rec uent-~F6ess 9~ s#s-de~eaSe ~9n t ~ A a ~ +' t ~ ges ~e s 'Si°€~F~21~7: 8$r~6e9 e5~e~69nd~ i~9asC~$-5~~~'v ~x ~ ' ~t €€~ ~ t~ ~ g y--~ ~a6~t~~d~i~ atYi a~ vrtttts e~al~e ~ub ~ cuS6$-- $ 3 5 3a a6 1}e '~s € l d .., ; A e ~a 4. Variance (VAR-08-002) Findings: a. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district; The City Council is supportive of the request for a variance for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required by UDC 11-3C-6 from 360 to 295. Further, City Council finds that granting a variance as requested would not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district for multi-family uses. Exhibit D CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 b. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; Staff believes there are no topographical limitations or other physical characteristics of this lot which would prevent full compliance with UDC 11-6C-3B.4. c. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. The City Council fmds that granting the variance should not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 5. Private Street Findings: a. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this Article• The applicant shall comply with the private street design standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4A and condition of approval #1.2.3 listed above in Exhibit B of this staff report. b. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage hazar - or nuisance, or other detriment to persons property or uses in the vicinity; and If the Applicant complies with the conditions listed in Exhibit B of this staff report pertaining to private streets, Staff does not anticipate anv hazar -nuisance or other detriment from the private streets if they are designed and constructed as required by UDC 11-3F-4. c. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and/or the regional transportation plan. Staff fmds that the use and location of the proposed private streets do not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and/or the regional transportation plan Exhibit D '_ ;'; ,: I ,' 't ~ r i. i s ,. June 13, 2008 CUP 08-004 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Mason 8~ Stanfield ITEM NO. 5-C REQUEST Findings for Approval -Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a multi family development in a proposed R-40 zone for Regency at River Valley {Revised) - 2500 North Eagle Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See crttached Findings CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: ~~s ~~Sf~--o Date: - Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Cffy of Meridian. `; ~! i ~. # ~~~ ~ ~ E g~ I. ~ ~ ~ ~, ri (4 I i l ?7 i i' ~ } :d ~, ~, i c ~~ ~, E > ~ r I }, ~~ fr x 1 j r ~ ; 1 Is t 'S L~ 1 f: 1 _x'3 ' i ~ 1' 1 ~ I ~ 3 ~ ~~ ~ f i ~ , ; E i ~ ' ? r ~~ F~ 1 ~ } r 4; ~ ''. ~ L. i .F } i I ~' a. . I! f ! ~: • CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER ~E IDIZ IAN ~J In the Matter of Annexation and Zoning of 12.06 acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) and C-C (Community Business) (1.5 acres) zoning districts; Conditional Use Permit for amulti-family residential development in a proposed R-40 zoning district; and Variance to UDC Table 11-3C-6 for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required for multi-family dwellings, by Mason & Stanfield, Inc. Case No(s). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 For the City Council Hearing Dates of: Apri122, May 20, and May 27, 2008 (Findings on the June 17, 2008 City Council agenda) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-SA. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 -1- • s 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Legal Description, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Building Elevations, Development Agreement, and the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-SA and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The Applicant's Annexation and Zoning request, as evidenced by having submitted the legal description and exhibit map, stamped and dated June 14, 2006, by Darin Holzhey, PLS, included in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008 incorporated by reference, is hereby conditionally approved. 2. A Development Agreement is required with approval of the subject Annexation & Zoning application and shall include the provisions noted in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008 incorporated by reference. 3. The Applicant's Conditional Use Permit request as evidenced by having submitted the Site Plan (dated 3/12/08), Landscape Plan (dated 1/08), and Building Elevations included in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, is hereby conditionally approved. 4. The Applicant's Variance request for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required for multi-family developments is hereby approved. 5. The site specific and standard conditions of approval are as shown in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Eighteen (18) Month Conditional Use Permit Duration CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 -2- ~~.3 6', S. '. Please take notice that the conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of eighteen (18) months unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time, the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting, the final plat must be recorded within this eighteen (18) month period. For projects with multiple phases, the eighteen (18) month deadline shall apply to the first phase. In the event that the development is made in successive contiguous segments or multiple phases, such phases shall be constructed within successive intervals of one (1) year from the original date of approval. If the successive phases are not submitted within the one (1) year interval, the conditional approval of the future phases shall be null and void. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-SB-6.G.1, the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1) eighteen (18) month period. Additional time extensions up to eighteen (18) months as determined and approved by the Commission maybe granted. With all extensions, the Director or Commission may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, a denial of a plat or conditional use permit entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review maybe filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which maybe adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the conditional use permit approval may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 -3- ~ H I ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~~ ~ ~?' jj t ~ ~ ~" .1i ~ 4 i '~ ' ~' ~ , t 3 ~ t ' ~ ~ i ~ ~: K i:~ ~ ~; ~ ~ E f s ~ t; ~ ~ ,~ f ~ 1 ~ ~ c S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,'t 4 i} ~ ~ Cj- ~ , i ar ~. i ~ i... G~~ ~ i h ~ j '~j 1 ~ ~~ ~ b = } ~ j 1 ~ ~~ µi K ~> ~ ~ i ~ I F'+~~ tut ~¢ j ~ 'j } ~ r ( ~ ~ p : y ~ ~ ~ 1 ri it t ~ ~ iS ~ {, 3 ~~ ~- ~ ~ { ~ ~ pp' f ~ ;~ ~ ~i rt f P:~ ~~ ~I ~ ~' '~ ', k y ~+'~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~I~~ ~:: i ' i t 1 E {~'~~t ~ ~' ~ x I~ ~ I ii F ~•' ~ { k ~ r g. .~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 5 S: [. ,~t 7' J ~~ it x 11 ~ f l ; ~ ` } y B a tion y of the Clty Council at rts regular meeting held on the ~~ day of l.~~rR~ , 2008. COUNCIL MEMBER DAVID ZAREMBA VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED_~r,1~ COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE VOTED 1i111.GL. COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD VOTED~~ MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED (TIE BREAKER) ````~`,,~~Ma3m~r~; r~mm Weerd ~ ~4 Attest: / .~`''d'~~ ~ ~~''.~ =~' ~ ~ ~~~ ~( ~ SLAL Jaycee olman, City Clerk ~ $~ ~~'~ 9Q~q T ts~ ~ ~P .~~~'` Copy served upon Applicant, The ~ s ~ ~inent, Public Works Deparhnent and City Attorney. City Clerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 -4- ~~° 1 } i ~+ f } 4~ t ~ k`,~ 1 fi ~5y ~ s ~ t t ti ~~ ~ gg~` a . ~ ~ 7 ~, ~ !•, ~ ~X ~ , - ~ 4 ~ If ~ t 4~ ,II ~3 r~ ~ ;; ~g F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~iE e ' qg G E` R i !,. ~: ~. ~ ~ i ~~~ i P i ti~~ 1 1~ I i~ ~ i r z ~ i~ ~ #~ ° ~. ~ o ~ ~ i ~ F~. ~ ~ T' ~ ~i ~ i ~ $~~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 STAFF REPORT Hearing Date: May 20, 2008 (Continued from April 22, 2008) TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Sonya Wafters, Associate City Planner (208) 884-5533 SUBJECT: Regency at River Valley (Revised) E IDIANz^ ~~8~ • AZ-08-003 Annexation and Zoning of 12.06 acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) and C-C (Community Business) (1.5 acres) zoning districts • CUP-08-004 Conditional Use Permit for amulti-family residential development in a proposed R-40 zoning district Iliel~~7z~ f ~ 11 ~ ., +., QLT GS/L'...l1,. D,.,..7 _ ..a.l b' J ~ K e Withdrawn • VAR-08-002 Variance to UDC Table 11-3C-6 for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required for multi-family dwellings • PS-OS-004 Request for approval of private streets within the proposed development The Commission heard these applications at the public hearing on March 6 2008 At the meeting on March 6'J`, the applicant decided to withdraw the Variance (VAR-08-001 request for a temporary access to SH SS/Eagle Road. At that meeting the Commission voted to continue the project until the March 20`h meeting so staff could update the conditions of approval (Staff had originally included draft conditions of approval because Staff was recommending several significant changes to the site plan); so the site plan could be revised by the ap~licant• and so comments/conditions could be obtained -from ACHD. On March 6'h the maker of the motion for continuance stated that they would like to see the following changes made to the site plan: 1) Add an emergency access only driveway to Allys N'ay; 2) Provide a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway on the site in accordance with Parks Department comments• and 3) Remove the temporary access to Eagle Road The maker of the motion also stated that their recommendation for approval would be prefaced on the applicant and NMID reaching an a~'eement pertaining to the relocation of the Downey Sublateral The Commission supported the Variance (VAR-08-002) request for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces reauired. The applicant has submitted a revised site plan, which staff has reviewed and made modifications to the staff~ort accordingly. Changes to the staff report since the March 6th version are in bold italics and underline Comments have been received from ACHD and are included in Exhibit B of this report. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 1. SUIVIlVIARY DESCRII'TION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST The Applicant, Mason & Stanfield, Inc., has applied for Annexation and Zoning (AZ) of 12.06 acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) and C-C (Community Business) (1.5 acres). Concurrently, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is requested for amulti-family residential development on 10.56 acres in a proposed R-40 zoning district. ~e A variances (VAR) to the Unified Development Code ~e is also requested as follows: 1)a~re-ro v~cTr ~~- ~.~,~~ , ~~;t ~ ,,.i. +;...e .,~ >; n:.,o.. v.,tto.. n,.,,,t ; ....~....,,+,.,,..._a ^• Variance to UDC Table 11-3C-6 for a reduction in the number of parking spaces required for multi-family dwellings in covered carports or garages The applicant is proposing 204 multi-family living units within 9 apartment buildings, a clubhouse, swimming pool area, a putting green, several gazebos, an entry water feature, pathways, extensive landscaping, and a playground area. The site is located at 2500 N. Eagle Road, approximately t/z mile north of the Fairview/Eagle intersection on the east side of Eagle Road. The subject property is currently located within the Urban Service Planning Area. 2. SUNIlVIARY RECOMMENDATION The subject applications (AZ, CUP, & VAR°s) were submitted to the Planning Department for concurrent review. By city code, the Planning & Zoning Commission is not required to hold a hearing on or act on the ~e variance applications. However, because the variance requests-ate is integral to the project, staff recommends that the Commission, as part of their action, state a preference on the twe variance requests. Below, staff has provided a detailed analysis of the proposed applications. Staff is recommending approval of the subject AZ, CUP, and PS applications per the conditions of approval in Exhibit B and the Development Agreement provisions in Section 10. Staff is recommendLng denial of the VAR application per the analysis in Section 10 and the findings in Exhibit D ~+- --- '---~---~° -• ~~n ~ ~~~~ m•--•'fi ~- ~ run .,,,a rm>n~ c+.~RaTmg+~t-+~p:9~@E~-l~C+~(~r-e na o ~ +,. +i,o ~;+e .,tom., ~ ~ ~ w rte. a • e ,.+: ~n a >c 1.•1.•+ a r ~ n CUP request. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearin: i. In favor: Lars Anderson, Bach Homes• Scott Stanfield_ Mason Stanfield Enineerin ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Andrew Wilk iv. Written testimony: David Kleinert Andrew Wilk v. Staff presentin application: Caleb Hood; Sonya Wafters vi. Other staff commentin on application: None b. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: i. The addition of an emer~ency access driveway to the site from Allys Way ii. Support of the request for annexation of 1.5 acres with a C-C zonin desisnation if the Variance request for a temporary access to Eagle Road is withdrawn• iii. Removal of one of the multi-family structures in order to provide covered parkin as required by the UDC for multi-family developments• Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY. Z0, 2008 iv. The request for a variance for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces reauired; v. The encroachment of structures and landscapins within the easement for the Stokesberry/DowneyLeteral along the south boundary and the proposed relocation of the lateral and easement further to the south; vi. Allowance of a 5-foot wide multi-use pathway through the site within a public use easement and si~na~e identifyin~ it as a public pathway if a 10-foot wide pathway is constructed along Allys Wav and E. River Valley Road: as approved by the Parks Department• c. Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. Required an emer~ency access only driveway to Allvs Wav u. Required amulti-use pathway on the site in accordance with Parks Department comments• iii. Removed the temporary access request (Variance) to Eagle Road• and iv. Recommendation of approval is based on the applicant and NAB reaching an . agreement pertaining to the relocation of the Downey Sublateral d. Outstandine Issue(s) for City Council: i. The Commission was supportive of the requested variance for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required; staff is not supportive. If the parkin variance is not granted a new site plan should be submitted. ii. Comments from AC13D have been received and are included in Ezhibit B of this report. iii. The applicant has submitted a private street application as required by Condition of Approval #1.2.3 (see Egttibit B). Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGES CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 ~, Kev Council Chan~ec to StafF/C'nmmiccinn RPrnmmpnr~atio i. Additional provision to be added to the Development Agreement• The City will not anurove the ordinance for annexation of the repuested parcel until one of three contineencies occurs• a) gTnhner/Kleiner No h Parcel PA is cl~ilPf1 anr~ *hP anna~al-inn nrr~inanro is -- b) The ROW for River Valley Street is derliratPrl to Af wi h accecc to ,aide Road• c) The ROW for Alleys Wav/Record Road is deli aterl to A[` wi h accecc to airview Avenue or Ustick Road Thi wo ld a low emuorarv ~ e of he eac er ' cuch 'm a fiver Va ley treat is cnnctrurtP Note: The City does not guaYantee that any of these conditions may occur within the one-year time frame of the DA aDnrovab These conditions may be odi~ed through the DA modification process 3. PROPOSED MOTION Partial Approval/PartialDanial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Numbers AZ-08- 003 CUP-08-004 and PS-08-004 +~~-- p- ~~, n c~ + ~ nn. ~ , '"citiscxva~~" -cccn.rcv~v~ , g~ and v ^ n nQ nn, p- deny File Number VAR-08-002, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008 with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Approval After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve File Numbers AZ-08- 003, CUP-08-004, ~' ^~-~ VAR-08-002, and PS-08-004 as presented during the hearing, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) (You should state specific reasons for approval of the variance.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Numbers AZ-08-003, CUP-08-004, ~'"D VAR-08-002, and PS-08-004 as presented during the hearing, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial of the annexation, conditional use permit, and variance, and what the applicant could do to gain your approval in the future.) Continuance I move to continue File Numbers AZ-08-003, CUP-08-004, "' ", VAR-08-002, and PS- OS-004 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) 4. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS a. Site Address/Location: 2500 N. Eagle Road (Parcel #S1104233914 & #51104233920) NW % of Section 4, T.3N., R.IE. b. Owners: RAMI, LLC; MBJR, LLC; Eagle Mesa, LLC; Eagle Coulter, LLC; JACOM, LC Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE4 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~'DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 c. Applicant: Mason & Stanfield, Inc. 314 Badiola Street Caldwell, Idaho 83605 d. Representative: Lars Anderson, Bach Homes e. Present Zoning: RUT (Ada County) f. Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Mixed Use -Regional g. Description of Applicant's Request: From the applicant's narrative: "We are requesting annexation of two zones and an accompanying CUP. The annexation request includes 1.5 acres (for C-C zone) for the westerly portion adjacent to Eagle Road and 10.91 acres for an R-40 zone. The request complies with the current Comprehensive Plan. The project will comply with the UDC with the exception of covered parking ^~a ~-M~- ° ^ ~-- *T ~ ~-~ n a." (See Applicant's letter for more detail.) 1. Date of Site Plan (attached in Exhibit A): "~^r^~ ~ c~ ~nn~ 3/12/08 (stamped by R. Scott Stanfield, P.E., and Darin Holzhey, P.L.S., °~~S) 2. Date of Landscape Plan (attached in Exhibit A): i ^,•^.~.'~, 'nn'' 1/08 (prepared by Lars Anderson, Bach Homes) 5. PROCESS FACTS a. The subject application will in fact constitute an Annexation & Zoning as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of UDC 11-SA-2, a public hearing is required before the Commission and City Council on this matter. b. The subject application will in fact constitute a Conditional Use Permit as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of UDC 11-SA-2, a public hearing is required before the Commission and City Council on this matter. c. The subject applications will in fact constitute a Variance as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of UDC 11-SA-2, a public hearing is required before the City Council on this matter. d. Newspaper notifications published on: February 18, 2008 and March 3, 2008 (Commission); March 31, and Apri114, 2008 (City Council) e. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: February 12, 2008 (Commission); March 28.2008 (Gifu Councill f. Applicant posted notice on site by: February 22, 2008 (Commission); April 9, 2008 (Gifu Council 6. LAND USE a. Existing Land Use(s): This properly is currently vacant with some existing outbuildings associated with a former residence. b. Description of Character of Surrounding Area: This area contains a mix of single-family residential properties, commercially zoned vacant land, and office uses. c. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 5 rt: z ~. 'r ~ . :r ; i ~~`i ;' .R i i I t CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 1. North: Vacant commercial property, zoned C-G 2. East: Vacant commercial property, zoned C-G and single-family residences in Redfeather Estates subdivision, zoned R-4 3. South: Vacant property (in the process of being zoned C-G -Meridian Town Center), zoned RUT (Ada County) 4. West: Single-family residence and vacant property, zoned RUT (Ada County); office uses (on the west side of Eagle Road), zoned L-O; and vacant property, zoned C-G d. History of Previous Actions: The following applications were submitted for this property in 2006 and all were denied by the City Council: • Annexation and Zoning (AZ-06-035) of 12.06 acres to C-C (Community Business District) (1.50 acres) and R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) • Conditional Use Permit (CUP-06-022) for amulti-family development consisting of 204 multi-family residential units • Private Street (PS-06-006) request adjacent to the proposed multi-family units • Variance (VAR-06-014) request to UDC 11-3C-6A to provide less than the required number of covered pazking stalls for multi-family dwellings • Variance (VAR-06-015) request to UDC 11-4.3.27B3 to provide less than 80 square feet of private, usable open space for each multi-family dwelling unit • Variance (VAR-06-016) request to UDC 11-3h-4B2 to construct a vehicular access to a state highway at a location other than a section line road or the half mile mark between sections e. Existing Constraints and Opportunities: 1. Public Works: Location of sewer: This property is proposing to connect to sewer mains located in Eagle Road. Location of water: This property is proposing to connect to water service mains located in Eagle Road. Issues or concerns: None 2. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: The South Slough runs along the northern boundary of this site. The Downey Sublateral runs along the south boundary of the site. 3. Existing trees: There are existing trees on the site that are proposed to be removed. The applicant shall comply with the mitigation requirements listed in UDC 11-3B-1 OC. 4. Floodplain: This property does not lie within the floodplain or floodway. 5. Hazards: The South Slough is located along the northern boundary of this site and may create a water hazard for small children as it will remain uncovered. 6. Proposed Zoning: R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) & C-C (Community Business) (1.5 acres) 7. Size of Property: 12.06 acres f. Landscaping Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 6 t ~ E _ + tf # ~ai - ~ ; } t } 1 k~ t f c ¢ l: ~ t I i I' gk ~t~ y Y~@ I Y I 1 l ~ ., 4V~ ~~. ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ f ; { ~ h ~ i ~ F k I ~, ~ E~11 0 ~:r' ~. ~ ~ t k,. ~2 t ~ f,l ~ ~ ~c ,i ~ I. ; ~ i tj ,t~ ~ ~yk~ t ~ f r ~ ~ P ~ l i ~, ~ .~ I. P$~ Y ~ 3 l' ~ ~ ' q i , SSf ~- , r r : ~_, ~ ~ ~~ c S ~ I ~ ~: ,. , i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , G, I E ~ i ~ ps ~ G, R -y ~ ~ j ' r i ~ ~ [p ,ri I Y ~~ f~ 4 ~' ti ~ t r + t l 4~ I r ~ t (~ S ll~ ~ ~ L ~FFF~... 3' 1~ l.` ~ I~ ~~C ~+f~~ ~ { ' { 4 ~ f ~a ~ ~ j I ~ ti }} { .~ 1 1r ~ ~ '}. 1 ' -~ { „ i fi'~ ~, i E~~G ~ r i - 6 'k~ }~~ f~ ~,; ~ a tt €~ I ~.~ i ~.~ ,a i, i' I;F ~' t ~:-_ i CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 1. Width of street buffer(s): A 35-foot wide buffer is required along Eagle Road/SH 55, an arterial street; a 20-foot wide buffer is required along Allys Way, a collector street, and a 20- foot wide buffer will be required along the future E. River Valley Road, a collector street. Street buffer landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. 2. Width of buffer(s) between land uses: A 25-foot wide buffer is required in commercial districts adjacent to any existing residential uses. There is currently an existing residence (parcel #1104234102) located at the south boundary of the portion of the property proposed to be zoned commercially. If the residential use of this property exists at the time of development (i.e. CZC submittal), a 25-foot wide buffer shall be provided along that boundary. Buffers to adjoining land uses shall be installed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. 3. Percentage of site as open space: 18% or 1.91 acres of useable open space 4. Other landscaping standards: Parking lot landscaping shall be installed per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. g. Amenities: Per UDC 11-4-3-27D.2, 4+ amenities are required for this development with at least one from each category (i.e. quality of life, open space, recreation). The following amenities are proposed: walking trails, clubhouse, water feature, swimming pool, a putting green, several gazebos, and a tot lot. The applicant has complied with this requirement. h. Off-Street Parking: UDC 11-3C-6 requires multi-family dwellings with 1 bedroom to have 2 parking spaces per unit, 1 in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 481-bedroom units, which requires 48 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces. Multi-family dwellings with more than 1 bedroom are required to have 2 parking spaces per unit in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 1 S6 units with more than 1 bedroom, which requires 312 covered spaces. A total of 360 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces are required on the site for a total of 408 spaces. The applicant has provided X299 covered spaces and 1-13109 uncovered spaces for a total of 408 spaces. A variance is requested for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required. i. Required Dimensional Standards for Multi-family Residential Use in the R-40 Zone, per UDC 11-4-3-27B and 11-2A-8: 1. Minimum Building Setback: A minimum 20-foot wide setback is required along the south and east property boundaries adjacent to E. River Valley Road and Allys Way because of the required 20-foot wide street buffers (per UDC Table 11-2A-8) and a minimum 10-foot wide setback is required along the north and west property boundaries (per UDC 11-4-3-27B). 2. Maximum Building Height: 60 feet j. Summary of Proposed Streets and/or Access: Access to the site is proposed from two access points to/from the future extension of E. River Valley Road.:~~=;w:c :ce ~: te~--~----~ + Fas1~Rf,.~d thrnneh tk,~, - ~~+- ~t + t, a n n • t + a ~+ ac ~'t}~11r1F1T'fiu~~~tlirirrnrn^~a + Y J + ~ t D a The applicant is proposing to construct 26' drive aisles within the multi-family development; Staff is requesting that the applicant submit a private street application and that minimum 26-foot wide private streets are provided. The applicant is proposing to construct a segment of Allys Way on the east boundary of the site in alignment with the existing Allys Way north of the site, on the north side of Ustick Road; Staff is supportive of Allys Way being constructed. An emer~ency only access to Allys Way to the east is ~ proposed; Staff is sunAOrtive of this access. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 7 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 rt~tx tl~-7t TTT) h~~ t~li~ ' +t, ~..,];,.,' ~L.e ., ..s:t ~t__. v_--- ~i-- _ 'Q,-,a ~.~•hi~ ~n»liF,~ti~n end n ~• *• t.b. .] 1 ~ .~ ..,.t, •.t at_ i-.• r r YY b` .,,1 ,. ,.11 1....,1 1:.,. ,. 77'71 Further, as of the print date of this report, comments have not been received from ACHD. However, Staff spoke with Matt Edmonds at ACHD and he stated that the applicant will be required to construct half the street section of E. River Valley Road abutting the site consisting of 24 feet of pavement and a 7-foot wide sidewalk (as proposed by the applicant). The applicant is proposing to dedicate and construct the whole right-of--way for Allys Way on the eastern portion of the site. Matt did not think that an emergency access point to Allys (as required by City Staff) to/from the site would be a problem. Further, ACHD is requiring a road trust deposit for half of the construction cost of the bridge over the South Slough. Please see Section 10, Analysis, and Exhibit B of this report for more information 7. COMMENTS MEETING On February 15, 2008 a joint agency and department meeting was held with service providers in this area. The agencies and departments present include: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian Parks Department, Meridian Public Works Department, Meridian Police Department, and the Sanitary Services Company. Staff has included comments, conditions and recommended actions in Exhibit B below. 8. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS This property is designated "Mixed Use -Regional" on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. In Chapter VII of the Comprehensive Plan, this designation is defined in part as an area that is situated in highly visible or transitioning parts of the City where innovative and flexible design opportunities are encouraged. The MU-R designation allows for over 200,000 square feet of non- residential uses, residential densities ranging from 3 to 40-dwelling units per acre, mixed use neighborhood and mixed use commercial uses, as well as regional commercial uses such as entertainment and employment centers and clean industry. Staff believes that the requested C-C and R-40 zoning of the property with 17.86 dwelling units per acre planned for the multi-family portion of the development, complies with the MU-R designation for this property (please see Analysis, Section 10 below for more information). Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to the proposed development (staff analysis in italics below policy): • Chapter VII, Goal III, Objective A, Action 1 -Require that development projects have planned for the provision of all public services. When the City established its Area of City Impact, it planned to provide City services to the subject property. The City of Meridian plans to provide municipal services to the subject property in the following manner: - Sanitary sewer and water service will be extended to the project at the developer's expense. - The subject lands currently lie within the jurisdiction of the Meridian Rural Fire District. Once annexed the lands will be under the jurisdiction of the Meridian City Fire Department, who currently shares resource and personnel with the Meridian Rural Fire Department. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 8 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 - The subject lands currently lie within the jurisdiction of the Ada County Sheriff's Office. Once annexed, the lands will be serviced by the Meridian Police Department (MPD). - The roadways adjacent to the subject lands are currently owned and maintained by the Ada County Highway District (ACl~ID). This service will not change. - The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian School District No. 2. This service will not change. - The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian Library District. This service will not change and the Meridian Library District should suffer no revenue loss as a result of the subject annexation. Municipal, fee-supported, services will be provided by the Meridian Building Department, the Meridian Public Works Department, the Meridian Water Department, the Meridian Wastewater Department, the Meridian Planning Department, Meridian Utility Billing Services, and Sanitary Services Company. Chapter V, Goal I, Objective A, Action 4 -Develop and maintain greenbelts along waterways. The applicant is proposing to construct a section of multi-use pathway on the site that will connect to the future master pathway planned along the north side of the South Slough via a pedestrian bridge at the northwest corner of the site. • Chapter V, Goal I, Objective A, Action 11 -Improve and protect creeks (Five Mile, Eight Mile, South Slough ...etc.) throughout commercial, industrial, and residential areas. The South Slough, which runs along the northern boundary of this site, should be improved and protected during development of the site. Chapter V, Goal I, Objective A.1 -Preserve and conserve our waterways, wetlands, wildlife habitat, and other natural resources. The South Slough, a natural waterway, runs along the northern boundary of this site. As a natural waterway, it will remain open and should be preserved. • Chapter VII, Goal I, Objective D, Action 9 -Require new residential development to provide permanent perimeter fencing to contain construction debris on site and prevent windblown debris from entering adjacent agricultural and other properties. The applicant is proposing to construct a 6 foot tall chain link fence along the north property boundary adjacent to the South Slough in accordance with UDC Il-3A-6B3. Six foot tall vinyl fencing is proposed along the west property boundary. Temporary construction fencing shall be constructed prior to release of building permits in all areas where permanent fencing is not proposed, to contain debris during construction. • Chapter V, Goal III, Objective D, Action 3 -Require all new parking lots to provide landscaping in internal islands. Landscaping is shown on the landscape plan within the parking areas in planter islands for the residential portion of the development. All parking lot landscaping shall be installed per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 1 -Protect existing residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels. The applicant is proposing a residential zone adjacent to Redfeather Subdivision, a residential subdivision, at the east boundary of the site and the existing residence at the Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 9 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 southwest corner of the site. The extension of Allys Way also separates this site from Redfeather Subdivision. If the property adjacent to Eagle Road is zoned commercially as proposed, a 25 foot wide landscape buffer is required to be constructed adjacent to residential uses. Staff finds that the proposed residential development should be compatible with the existing residential properties in the area. • Chapter VII, Goal I, Objective C, Action 4 -Require new residential development to meet development standards regarding landscaping, signage, fences, and walls, etc. The Applicant will be required to construct a 20 foot wide landscape buffer along E. River Valley Road that complies with UDC 11-3B-7, Landscape Buffers along Streets. All signage proposed for the site must be approved through a sign permit and shall comply with UDC 11- 3D-10, Table 2. Fencing proposed on the site shall comply with UDC 11-3A-7. • Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 10 - Support a variety of residential categories (low-, medium-, and high-density single-family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. Staff believes that the proposed high-density multi family residential development will assist in providing a variety of residential housing opportunities in the City. 9. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE a. Schedule of Uses: Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-2A-21ists multi-family developments as a conditional use in the R-40 zoning district. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3-27) apply to multi-family developments; please see Section 10, Analysis below for more information. UDC Table 11-2B-21ists several uses that are principal permitted uses, conditional uses, and prohibited uses in the proposed C-C zoning district. Among the principal permitted uses are animal care facilities; indoor/outdoor arts, entertainment or recreation facilities; building material, garden equipment and supplies; churches, group daycares, education institutions, financial institutions, flex space, fuel sales facility, healthcare or social services, information industry, Laundromat, mortuary, nursery or urban farm, parks, personal or professional service, public/quasi-public use, restaurant, retail store, minor vehicle repair, vehicle washing facility, vertical integrated residential project, etc. b. Purpose Statement of the Proposed Districts: Residential Districts: Per UDC 11-2A-1, the purpose of the residential districts is to provide for a range of housing opportunities consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Connection to the City of Meridian water and sewer systems is a requirement for all residential districts. Residential districts are distinguished by the allowable density of dwelling units per acre and corresponding housing types that can be accommodated within the density range. Commercial Districts: Per UDC 11-2B-1, the purpose of the commercial districts is to provide for the retail and service needs of the community in accord with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Four districts are designated which differ in the size and scale of commercial structures accommodated in the district, the scale and mix of allowed commercial uses, and the location of the district in proximity to streets and highways. 10. ANALYSIS a. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation: ~Ia€€ -~ ifia.,,,+ ,.1..,., + +i, •~ ~ .,~ ~ ~1C-'ll~w-r_n',. °..a~b ~1,..+ }~ r~_!'~ a aJ ...J a~~~va~--aoc-v~-a~ zz Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 10 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 _ ..a i.,, + ~, + + L r ~ sEntl-lictnrl ,•~•~~ ~ ,,,,,, a a +.. .. a •+1. ~ • 1,~ + ~ €a~pertieu-e~..~.; a 2H~a~~-v~r ~ ~ + ~, ~ 1. Annexation & Zoning (AZ): Based on the policies and goals contained in the Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map designation of Mixed Use -Regional, Staff believes that the requested R-40 and C-C zoning districts are appropriate for this r0 , a.r ~.~unr-~rr~E~$iresoa of cac r~ acc coos civic-v~r-ci}v e :Staff believes that access to the portion of the property proposed to be zoned C-C and all of the properties fronting Eagle Road/SH 55 south of the South Slou should be provided from the south via a bacl{age road that connects to the future E. River Valley Road and that across-access/ingress-egress easement should be provided to the properties to the north and south from the subiect property mat ••••••• ~ ov vorraaur .~..-avrmvr ac:vaTosuarivvaa~sacaac~cUIItll the residential property to the south re-develops, the proposed commercial portion of the property will not be able to access E. River Valley Road, and should not use Eagle Road as access. ~~ +~... ---.-+=- ~. .~ ..i. a~.....Ia 1. a L , i , . Staff is recommending approval of the annexation and zoning of 1.5 acres to C-C (see legal description & exhibit map for C-C zone m Eglubit C.31. Staff is ~v~; supportive of the requested R-40 zoning designation for the eastern portion of the property proposed for multi-family residential use for the following reasons: The Comprehensive Plan future land use designation for this property of MiJ- R allows for residential densities of 3 to 40 units per acre. The applicant is proposing 204 residential units within a proposed R-40 zoning district, which allows for the property to develop within the desired densities stated in the Comprehensive Plan for this area. Further, Staff believes that amulti-family development would be appropriate and would contribute to the variety of uses in this area. For these reasons, Staff is recommending of approval of the annexation and zoning of 10.56 acres to R-40 (see legal description & exhibit map for R-40 zone in Exhibit C.2). Please see Exhibit D for a detailed analysis of the required facts and findings for an annexation & zoning request. The legal description submitted with the application (stamped on June 14, 2006 by Darin Holzhey, PLS) is accurate and meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and Idaho -State Tax Commission. UDC 11-SB-3D2 provides the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council the authority to require a property owner to enter into a Development Agreement (DA) with the City of Meridian that may require some written commitment for all future uses. Because of the nature of the development and the high density zoning district proposed by the applicant, Staff believes that a DA is necessary to ensure that the site develops in a manor that is consistent with said plans. Staff has included a list of recommended DA provision below. If the Commission or Council feels additional development agreement Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 11 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~i DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 provisions are necessary, staff recommends a clear outline of the commitments of the developer being required. Development Agreement: A Development Agreement (DA) will be required as part of annexation of this property. Prior to annexation approval, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. The applicant shall contact the City Attorney, Bill Nary, at 888-4433, within b metes l r of City Council approval to initiate this process. The DA shall include, at minimum, the following: a. A maximum of 204 multi-family residential units shall be allowed to be constructed on the site. b. A minimum 5,868 square foot clubhouse shall be constructed on the site, as proposed. c. At a minimum, amenities shall be constructed on the site as proposed on the site plan (i.e. clubhouse, water feature, swimming pool, walking trails, tot lot, gazebos, etc.). d. All multi-family structures shall comply with the architectural standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27E. Structures shall be constructed on the site in accordance with the elevations attached in Exhibit A. e. The site/structures shall comply with the Specific Use Standards listed in UDC 11-4- 3-27 for multi-family developments. f. The applicant shall comply with the parking standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6 for multi-family developments as follows: for 1 bedroom units, there shall be two parking spaces with at least one in a covered carport or garage; and for units with more than one bedroom, 2 parking spaces shall be provided, both in a covered carport or garage. No variance to this standard is granted. g. A legally binding document shall be recorded that states the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including, but not limited to, structures, parking, common areas, and other development features, per UDC 11-4-3-27G. h. Access to this site shall be provided from E. River Valley Road and an emer~ency only access shall be provided from Allys Way. Access to Eagle Road is prohibited. i. The applicant shall dedicate right-of--way and construct Allys Way in accordance with ACHD standards, in alignment with Allys Way north of the site, on the north side of Ustick Road, prior to release of occupancy of any structure on this site. j. The applicant shall construct (or have available) at least half the street section of E. River Valley Road (24 feet of pavement and 7-foot wide sidewalk) in accordance with ACHD standards, prior to release of occupancy of any structure on this site. k. All existing buildings on the site shall be removed prior to release of building permits for this development. 1. Twenty-six foot wide private streets shall be provided within the site in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. m. A 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along the future extension of E. River Valley Road, per UDC Table 11-2A-8. Landscaping shall be provided in said buffer in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C, Landscape Buffers along. Streets. If NMID will not allow landscaping (i. e. trees) within their easement for the Downey Sublateral and if there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the street buffer, the applicant shall provide an additional S foot wide strip for landscaping outside of the NMID easement, per UDC ll -3B-7C1 b. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 12 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 n. The Downey Sublateral easement along the southern boundary of the site shall either be relocated so that structures do not encroach within the easement OR the structures shall be relocated outside of the easement, prior to submittal of the first Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the pazking and common areas. o. A 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along Allys Way, per UDC Table 11- 2A-8. Landscaping shall be provided in said buffer in accordance with the standazds listed in UDC 11-3B-7C, Landscape Buffers along Streets. p. Landscaping shall be provided on the site in accordance with the specific use standards for multi-family developments listed in UDC 11-4-3-27F. q. The applicant shall construct 6-foot tall vinyl fencing along the west property boundary and 6-foot tall chain link fencing along the north side of the property adjacent to the South Slough as depicted on the landscape plan. Temporary construction fencing is required to be installed where permanent fencing is not proposed, azound the residential portion of the site prior to issuance of building permits to contain debris during construction. Fencing shall be constructed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. r. A minimum 5-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer is required adjacent to parking and vehicular use azeas along the north boundary of the site and adjacent to the existing residence on the west boundary of the site, per UDC 11-3B-8C. Said buffer is required to be planted with one tree per 35 linear feet and shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative ground cover. If NMID will not allow trees within their easement for the South Slough, the applicant may apply for Alternative Compliance in accordance with UDC 11-SB-S. s. A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway and bridge over the South Slough shall be constructed on the site in accordance with the Parks Department conditions contained in Exhibit B and the standards in the Master Pathways Plan and UDC 11- 3A-8. t. With the first CZC application, include mitigation details for the 9 existing trees on the site, consisting of 120 caliper inches, proposed to be removed, in compliance with UDC 11-3B-10. Contact Elroy Huff, City Arborist, 888-3579 for more details. u. The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) for approval of all of the pazking and common areas on the site prior to submittal of CZC's for structures. v. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance is required prior to issuance of a building permit for any and all of the proposed multi-family structures within this development. All structures must substantially comply with the building elevations submitted with this application (see Exhibit A), the architectural standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27E for multi-family developments, and conditions of approval and DA provisions listed in Exhibit B of this report. NOTE: A CZC application may include multiple/all multi family structures within the development w. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance is reauired prior to issuance of a building permit for the commercial portion of the development Because the commercial portion of the property is located adiacent to an entrvway corridor (Earle Road), the future structure(s) and site shall be subiect to the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19C. x. Development of the C-C zoned portion of the site shall not occur until such time as access is provided to/from E. River Valley Road or some other frontage/baclcage street; direct lot access to Eagle Road is prohibited Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 13 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 y. A backage road shall be constructed on the east side of the C-C zoned portion of the site and across-access/ingress-egress easement shall be provided to the properties to the north and south for an extension of the backage road and future access to E. River Valley Road. A copy said cross- access/ingress-egress easement shall be provided to the Planning Department prior to issuance of the issuance of a certificate of zoning compliance application for the first multi-family building. z. The Citv will not auArove the ordinance for annexation of the requested parcel until one of three con 'naencies occurs• Ll_ The Ifleiner North Parcel nA is cwnprl A...a t>tio a n ration or finance i 21 The ROW for River Va 1 V Street is rledi ate! tp A('' Wl h ac c F.a~le Road. 31 The ROW for Alleys Wav/Recnrds Rnari .~ r~pr~ioatari t.. sr wit ai_rview Aven ~e or tick Road Thi wo old a low emnorarv the eastern ewer encv acce ~n '1 uch tim a fiver Va ley Street is constructed Note• The City does not guarantee that any of these cnnditinnc may occuY within the one-year time ft•ame ofthe_DA anvrovaL These conditions may be modired through the DA modification nrnce.¢c 2. Conditional Use Permit (CUP): The applicant has submitted a site plan (stamped by Scott Stanfield on x}{9,8 3/12/08, included as Exhibit A.2). The site plan depicts 9multi-family residential structures consisting of a total of 204 residential units and a 5,868, square foot clubhouse for the portion of the site proposed to be zoned R-40. These units consist of 28 1- bedroom units consisting of 833 square feet (s.f.) each; 20 1-bedroom Executive units consisting of 871 s.f. each; 104 2-bedroom units consisting of 1,037 s.f. each; 28 2-bedroom Executive units consisting of 1,110 s.f. each; and 24 3-bedrom units consisting of 1,228 s.f. each (see floor plan ofmulti-family units in Exhibit A.10). The overall square footage of residential uses proposed for the property is 209,144 s.f. The applicant states that this project will not be phased but may take a couple of years to construct. Parking is provided on the site for the multi-family units as follows: There are 7 garage structures depicted on the plan that contain 6 parking spaces each for a total of 42 enclosed spaces; X3257 carport parking spaces are provided that allow for a total of X95299 covered spaces; and X13109 open stalls are provided for a total of 408 parking stalls provided on the site (see covered parking analysis below for more information on compliance with UDC standards). .Per UDC 11-3C-5B, all off-street parking areas shall be provided with a substantial wheel restraint to prevent cars from encroaching upon abutting private and public property or overhanging beyond the designated parking stall dimensions. Wheel stops are not depicted on the site plan. The applicant must either install wheel stops for all parking adjacent to sidewalks or landscaping or the sidewalk or landscape area may be widened 2 feet to allow for vehicle overhang, and the stall length may be reduced by 2 feet (from 19' to 17'). Bicycle parking is also required on the site as follows: 1 bicycle parking space is required for every 25 proposed vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof, per UDC 11-3C-6G. Because 408 parking stalls are proposed on the site, l6 bicycle spaces are required to be provided. As a provision of the DA, the applicant shall submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 14 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 for approval of all of the parking and common areas on the site prior to submittal of CZC's for structures. Several amenities are proposed on the site in compliance with UDC standards (see amenities analysis below for more information). The property proposed to be zoned C-C is included on the site plan with a conceptual plan of how the property may develop in the future; however, no development of the 1.5 acre C-C property is proposed at this time. If the property is annexed, a backage road should be constructed along the east boundary of the commercial district, in compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-4B3. Further, across-access/ingress-egress easement should be provided to the properties to the north and south of the site. No development of this site should occur until the backage road is connected to River Valley Road. Per UDC 11-2A-2, Multi-family Developments require conditional use permit approval and must comply with the Specific Use Standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 as follows: a. Setbacks: Buildings shall provide a minimum setback of 10 feet, unless a greater setback is otherwise required by the UDC. (iJDC Table 11-2A-7 requires a greater setback of 15 feet in the rear.) The building envelopes shown on the site plan meet the minimum setback requirements stated However, the structures shown along the south boundary encroach approximately l2 feet into the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District's easement for the Downey SublateraL (See discussion below under "ditches, canals, & laterals.') b. Service areas: On-site service areas, outdoor storage areas, waste storage, disposal facilities, and transformer or utility vaults shall be fully screened from view from any public street. The Applicant shall comply with this requirement. c. Private, usable open space: A minimum of 80 square feet of private, usable open space shall be provided for each unit. This requirement can be satisfied through porches, patios, decks, and/or enclosed yards. Landscaping, entryway and other access ways shall not count toward this requirement. Private usable open space is proposed for each unit that exceeds the minimum amount required by the UDC. (1 bedroom units contain 84 square feet of deck area, and 2 & 3 bedroom units contain 81 square feet of deck area.)(See floor plan attached in Exhibit A.10.) Staff is supportive of the proposed private, usable open space. d. Developments with 20 units or more shall provide the following: A property management office, a maintenance storage area, a central mailbox location (including provisions for parcel mail), and a directory and map of the development at a convenient location. This development does contain more than 20 units and will comply with this requirement. A property management off ce and central mailbox location with parcel storage is proposed within the clubhouse (see clubhouse floor plan in Exhibit A.11). A directory and map of the development is shown at the entrance of the development on the landscape plan (see Exhibit A.3). The applicant states that the maintenance storage area will be located within garage building #1. Staff is supportive of the proposed amenities. e. Covered Parking: UDC 11-3C-6 requires that multifamily developments shall provide parking as follows: for 1 bedroom units, there shall be two parking spaces with one in a covered carport or garage; and for units with more than one bedroom, 2 parking spaces shall be provided in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 481-bedroom units, which requires 48 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces. The site plan shows 156 units with more than Ibedroom, which requires 312 covered spaces. A total of 408 stalls; 360 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces are required on the site. The Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 15 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 applicant has provided ~9-S 299 covered spaces and X3109 uncovered spaces. A variance is requested for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required from 360 to ~9-S 299. Staff is not supportive of the proposed parking variance. (see i~ariance analysis below) f. Common Open Space Design Requirements: UDC 11-4-3.27C requires a minimum of 250 square feet of outdoor common open space for each unit containing more than 500 square feet and up to 1,200 square feet of living area, and 350 square feet for each unit containing more than 1,200 square feet of living area. (The common open space shall be not less than 400 square feet in area, and shall have a minimum length and width dimension of 20 feet.) Based on the square footage of the proposed units, a total of 53, 400 square feet of common open space is required; 83, 312 square feet of open space is proposed on the site plan, which complies with this requirement. f. Amenities: UDC 11-4-3.27 requires that multi-family developments with 75 units or more provide 4 amenities with at least one from each category (i.e. quality of life, open space, or recreation). Further, for multi-family developments with more than 100 units, the decision making body shall require additional amenities commensurate to the size of the proposed development. Because 204 units are proposed with this development at least 4 amenities are required. Staff believes that the applicant more than complies with this requirement by providing the following qualifying amenities: 1) walking trails, Z) clubhouse, 3) waterfeature, 4) swimmingpool, S) a puttinggreen, 6) several gazebos, and 7) a tot lot. g. Elevations: Elevations are required to meet the architectural standards set forth in UDC 11-4-3-27E. The applicant is proposing 9 multi family structures, S of which consist of different elevations (they aren't all the same). The structures are all proposed to have brick veneer masonry, stucco, stone veneer, andfiberglass-reinforced asphalt shingles. All of the structures are 2-3 stories in height, have the same architectural design and appearance but are different in size based on how many units they contain. One single- story clubhouse str-uture is also proposed with the same construction materials as the multi family structures. No colors are listed for the structures on the elevations but the colored drawing the applicant submitted contained in Exhibit A. 6 depict 4 di, fferent colors on one structure. All of the structures within the development should have a mix of colors and materials as depicted on the colored elevation and architectural elevations contained in Exhibit A. The proposed elevations appear to comply with the architectural standards. If approved, full compliance with the elevation requirements cited in UDC 11- 4-3-27E, and the elevations submitted with the subject CUP, will be required with the future issuance of Certificate of Zoning Compliances on this site. h. Landscaping: Per UDC 11-4-3-27, all street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundation. The foundation landscaping shall meet the following standards: - The landscaped area shall be at least 3-feet wide; - For every 3 linear feet of foundation, an evergreen shrub having a minimum mature height of 24 inches shall be planted; and - Ground cover plants shall be planted in the remainder of the landscaped area. i. Maintenance and Ownership Responsibilities: Per UDC 11-4-3-27G, a legally binding document shall be recorded that states the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including, but not limited to, structures, parking, common areas, and other development features. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 16 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 Access: Access to the site is proposed from r , p, ;~~~r ~~~ the future River Valley Road and an emerisency only access to/from `Allys Wav. ++*sovrix+ii c o.,mmexFi~l ~F~.~--~n~ iiatarL. ',i +' 1 ..t ~F +L. ,7 1 - -+ n ~T rr~r. ~ Y e rr r ~ r Y° ~ «g•• - r v o ' ~ e n n~However, Staff spoke with Matt Edmonds at ACHD and he stated that the applicant will be required to construct half the street section of E. River Valley Road abutting the site consisting of 24 feet of pavement and a 7-foot wide sidewalk (as proposed by the applicant). The applicant is proposing to dedicate and construct the whole right-of--way for Allys Way on the eastern portion of the site. Matt did not think that an emergency access point to Allys (as required by City Staff) to/from the site would be a problem. Further, ACHD is requiring a road trust deposit for half of the construction cost of the bridge over the South Slough. Stub Streets• N~ °~•'~ °*-'°°*~ ~ ° °a °-- +~° ~-+° --~-- The Fire Department is • YY requesting that a stub street be provided from the site to Allys Way because of fire code requirements for the number of dwellings proposed;_ the anulicant has revised the site plan to include an emergency only access to Allys Wav which staff is suuuortive of. Staff has included a condition requiring construction of and access to Allys Way for this development. Ally's Way: The future alignment of Ally's Way, which exists north of the site, north of Ustick Road at the % mile, lies along the eastern boundary of the subject property. As part of the development of this site, the applicant will be required to dedicate right-of--way and construct Allys Way in accordance with ACRD standards. Further, staff has included a DA provision that an emerisency only access be provided to/from Allys Way for this development. E~sting ResidencesBuildings: The site currently contains some existing outbuildings that were associated with a previous residence. The remainder of the site consists of vacant land. All existing buildings shall be removed prior to release of building permits for this development. Fencing: The applicant is proposing to construct 6-foot tall vinyl fencing along the west property boundary and 6-foot tall chain link fencing along the north side of the property adjacent to the South Slough. Temporary construction fencing is required to be installed where permanent fencing is not proposed, around the residential portion of the site prior to issuance of building permits to contain debris during construction. Fencing shall be constructed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. Landscape Plan: The applicant submitted a conceptual landscape plan for the residential portion of the site dated ~l8~ 1/08. The applicant should note the following and/or make revisions to the landscape/site plan as follows: Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along the future extension of E. River Valley Road, as proposed. If NMID will not allow landscanin~ (i.e. trees) within their easement for the Downey Sublateral and if Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 17 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLASPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA>~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the street buffer the applicant shall provide an additional 5 foot wide stria for landscaping outside of the NMID easement per UDC II-3B-7Clb• • Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along Allys Way; • Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 35-foot wide street buffer will be required along Eagle Road/5H 55, an entryway corridor (upon development of the commercial portion of the site when annexed). • If the property proposed to be annexed with a C-C zoning district is annexed, and at the time of CZC submittal there is a residence adjacent, a 25-foot wide buffer shall be provided along the east and/or south boundaries of the commercial site. • Per UDC 11-3B-8C, a 5-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer is required adjacent to parlang and vehicular use areas along the north boundary of the site and adjacent to the e~sting residence on the west boundary of the site. Said buffer is required to be planted with one tree per 351inear feet and shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative ground cover. If NMID will not allow trees within their easement for the South Slough, the applicant may apply for Alternative Compliance in accordance with UDC 11-SB-5. • A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway and bridge over the South Slough shall be provided on the site in accordance with the Parks Department conditions contained in Exhibit B and the standards in the Master Pathways Plan and UDC 11-3A-8. • With the first CZC application, include mitigation details for the 9 existing trees on the site, consisting of 120 caliper inches, proposed to be removed, in compliance with UDC 11-3B-10. Contact Elroy Huff, City Arborist, 888-3579 for more details. • A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted with the CZC application per the requirements on the CZC checklist, the conditions of approval noted in Exhibit B, in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B. A detailed review of the final landscaping on this site will take place with the first Certificate of Zoning Compliances) application for the parking areas on this site. The aforementioned notes/revisions should be reflected on a revised plan submitted with the CZC application. Mitigation: The site plan depicts 9 existing trees, consisting of 120 caliper inches, on the site that are proposed to be removed upon development of the property. Per UDC 11-3B-10, mitigation is required for all existing trees 4-inch caliper or greater removed form the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of 100% replacement. Staff recommends that the applicant comply with the mitigation standards listed in UDC 11- 3B-IOC. Multi-Use Pathway: The Parks Department has submitted the following analysis on the multi-use pathway required on this site: The Meridian Pathways Master Plan depicts a future public pathway along the north side of the South Slough (aka Finch Lateral or Finch Creek), which crosses the canal near the location of the future Pedestrian Bridge depicted on the site plan, continues south through the subject property and connects to the intersection of River Palley Road and Eagle Road. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 18 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 With the recent annexation of the Meridian Town Center property, we expect to have a future pathway built in the proposed 60-acre park along the south side of the South Slough, east of Alley's Way/Records Drive. This will provide for another future pathway connection point. To connect with the future pathway in 60-acre park site, we recommend constructing the sidewalk along the north side of River Palley Street as a 10- foot, detached multi-use pathway. A north/south public pathway connection through the project, ~•° ~~•~°°•'~~~~~ ~•~~*~ *~ p°*'"•""'° a~ °`~•- D'~•° is also required between River Valley Street and the pedestrian bridge. The applicant has agreed to make the connection, but has requested that this connection be allowed to be S feet wide (on the proposed sidewalks) instead of the standard IOfeet wide due to potential impacts to the project. ~''~'''~•-~~ •-~ *~~* s~~~ted-in-~zD•C '~- T Staff supuorts this reauest provided the applicant maintains the narrower pathway. sien it for the public and construct a 10-foot north-south connection alone Ally's Way. (Please see conditions of approval in Exhibit B.) Ditches, Laterals, and Canals: The South Slough runs along the northern boundary of this site. The Downey 5ublateral runs along the southern boundary of the site. Per UDC 11-3A-6 all irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of any natural waterway, that intersect, cross or lie within the area being subdivided shall be covered. The South Slough is a natural waterway and will remain open; the Downey Lateral shall be covered Per the Comprehensive Plan, the South Slough should be improved and protected with development of this property. Note: The structures depicted on the site plan along the southern boundary encroach approximately I2 feet within Nampa Meridian Irrigation District's easement for the Downey Sublatera~ Staff spoke with Steve Earl, Mason & Stanfield, regarding this issue and he stated that the lateral was going to be relocated 25 feet to the south. If the lateral is relocated, the structures would no longer be within the easement At the time of CZC application, the easement should have already been relocated, OR the structures shall be relocated outside of the easement The applicant should submit a letter from NMID prior to the next Commission action on this project documenting that they are amenable to relocating the lateral and easement &~~~~r c ;~'-- - a *~ • ~rn.rrn •» ,. ~, ~ will not allow landscaping (i.e. trees) within their easement for the Downey Sublateral and if there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the street buffer, the applicant shall provide an additional S-foot wide stria for landscaping outside of the N11aD easement. per UDCII-3B-7CIb; Pressure Irrigation: The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, asingle-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single- point connection is used, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. An underground, pressurized irrigation system should be installed to all landscape areas per the approved specifications and in accordance with UDC 11-3A-15 and MCC 9-1-28. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 19 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAi~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC): Staff is requesting as a DA provision, that a CZC application be submitted for approval of all parking and common areas on the site prior to submittal of CZC's for structures on the site. Additionally, a Certificate of Zoning Compliance is required prior to issuance of a building permit for any and all of the proposed multi-family and/or commercial structures within this development. All structures must substantially comply with the building elevations submitted with this application (see Exhibit A), the architectural standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27E for multi-family developments, and conditions of approval and DA provisions listed in Exhibit B of this report. Additionally, any future structure(s) proposed on the commercial portion of the development is required to comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19C for structures located along entryway corridors. NOTE: A CZC application may include multiple/all multi family structures within the development. Private Streets: The applicant is not proposing private streets within this development. For addressing purposes, the Fire Department and Public Works is requesting that private streets be provided within this development. The applicant shall submit a Private Street application to the City prior to the City Council meeting. Per UDC 11-3F- 4, all private streets shall be designed and constructed to the following standards: A. Design standards: 1. Easement: The private street shall be constructed on a perpetual ingress/egress easement or a single platted lot that provides access to all applicable properties. 2. Connection point: Where the point of connection of the private street is to a public street, the private street shall be approved by the Transportation Authority. 3. Emergency vehicle: The private street shall provide sufficient maneuvering area for emergency vehicles as determined and approved by the Meridian Fire Department. 4. Gates: Gates or other obstacles shall not be allowed. B. Construction standards: 1. For conversion of an existing facility to a private street at the direction of the Fire Marshall: a. All drive aisles shall be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed. b. If a curb exists next to the drive aisle, it shall be painted red. 2. For all other private streets: a. Roadway and storm drainage: The private street shall be constructed in accord with the roadway and storm drainage. standards of the Transportation Authority or as approved by the City of Meridian based on plans submitted by a certified engineer. b. Street width: The private street shall be constructed within the easement and shall have a travel lane width of twenty-four (24) feet or twenty-six (26) feet as determined by the Fire Marshal relative to the height and size of the proposed structures that adjoin the private street. Due to the height of the proposed structures, the Fire Department is requiring a travel lane of 26 feed regnir~rnen~ The site elan submitted with the private street application reflects this reauirement+ Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 20 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~NNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 c. Sidewalks: Afive-foot (5') attached sidewalk or four-foot (4') detached sidewalk shall be provided on one side of the street in commercial districts. This requirement may be waived if the applicant can demonstrate that an alternative pedestrian path exists. Five foot wide detached sidewalks are proposed in front of the structures adjacent to parking. d. Fire lanes: All drive aisles shall be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed. In addition, if a curb exists next to the drive aisle, it shall be painted red. ..1;,,.,., ~~'~5~~'~lzrr-~aricsaccie b~BC-~1- ~- ~~/F~T~e,~~-iantal~~~ah tirx~ao L' D' v n n .,a • .... ~ a ~rL ~ ('~: ~, ~ ,. +i,e r tl,. e 1 ~ mt, ~P6~P-S6ui~3 C~~-F'F~P~zD • ~r~ll~-n Qv ) cv s ~FEe4G tFa F1'lstlw~-I~n.~d unnwr 'll n a ~ a ~ ~ ~ a- J / a~ ~ ~ ,~.+_ « ' ,,,-F ..e ,e,l ;t'sa rozx r~~ror 1' !"~'~ + ~ + •'f3$ 9~t1~P~ur ~v~vacxcc ~ ~ ~~ ThP-~',~tlnnrahrmcav D1 ' TT ' n ei....«,o..~ !` a .a t• •a• r ~~.,+o l,' 1, ac.mbu~dii~.r. e , Tl.o 1, 11 4 1. ,7Pfficr ioZn° aoacaoai•L, ~F ~. ,] ^~' ca~axcc~aa~vE`l-f-nre-~ .,il.. o,i F ,...~: .L_ _~~_ r Y b f f e , 7 ~i3a~~«<„~~e-s}~e~e-p~e,z~e~~e~ .,1 . ` VSlI~I<PV RAlFl~ Alt!'` A71 tIl •l+ ,..,},,..] . 1. d d /D/ 7a' 1 'Z 't T . Annlicant withdrew request for temnorary access at the Commission hearing on March 6 2008 4. Variance (VAR-08-002): The applicant is requesting approval of a Variance to UDC Table 11-3C-6 for a reduction in the number of parking spaces required for multi-family dwellings in covered carports or garages. UDC 11-3C-6 requires multi-family dwellings with 1 Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 21 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 bedroom to have 2 parking spaces per unit, 1 in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 48 -bedroom units, which requires 48 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces. Multi-family dwellings with more than 1 bedroom are required to have 2 parking spaces per unit in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 156 units with more than 1 bedroom, which requires 312 covered spaces. A total of 360 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces are required on the site (408 total spaces required). The applicant has provided ~9-S 299 covered spaces and ~ 109 uncovered space (408 total spaces proposed). A variance is requested for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required from 360 spaces to ~9-S 299 spaces. The reason for the variance is that an 80-foot wide Nampa Meridian Irrigation District (NMID) easement exists along the entire northern boundary of the site where the South Slough is located. NMID does not allow permanent structures to be built within their easement. In order to grant a variance, the City Council is required to make the following fmdings (per UDC 11-SB-4E): a. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district; b. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; and c. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. Staff has reviewed these findings and while Staff does not believe that granting the requested variance would be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare, Staff does find that granting the subject variance would allow a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district for multi-family developments. Further, Staff does not believe an undue hardship exists because of characteristics of the site in which the City should grant a variance. Staff believes that a residential structure(s) could be removed and the site redesigned in order to have additional room for the amount of UDC required covered parking spaces. For these reasons, Staff recommends that the requested variance for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required be denied and the required parking be provided on the site per UDC requirements. (Please see Exhibit D for a detailed analysis of the required facts and findings for a variance request.) 5. Private Street (PS-08-0041: The Applicant submitted a Private Street application on 4/18/08 requesting approval of private streets within the development. per requirement of Staff for addressing purposes. The applicant is proposing 2C~foot wide streets within the site, per requirement of the Fire Department. Staff is supportive of the proposed private street application. The proposed private streets shall be constructed in accordance with the standards listed above. per UDC 11-3F-4. b. Staff Recommendation: ~~Ee ~~^^--* ^~-^-- ~ *~- '* ~ p~-~~plan;~eeess-plan,-and s#uet~e =e~in-~ er these room;-~d~,~e Ft~mmpx~~ 1, * + z, a ~. .,, ~ rrun ^.,a rmn e~ ~ ~ , . Staff is generally supportive of the requested annexation & zoning of 10.56 acres to R-40, ~° ^^* m,^^^~•~ ^f and the request for annexation & zoning of 1.5 acres to C-C (see Analysis, Section 10, for more information). Further, staff is generally supportive of the CUP for amulti-family development, but is not supportive of °~~~~ the requested Variance application. Staff is supportive of the request for private street (PS-08- Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 22 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNINN~EEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 004) within the development Therefore, staff recommends approval of the subiect AZ, CUP and PS applications and denial of the subject VAR application See the Analysis in Section 10 and the Findings in Exhibit D of the staff report. At the public hearing on March 20`°, they moved to recommend approval of the subiect A2 and CUP request he Meridian City Council heard hec itpmc nn April 27 Mav ~n an av 27 2008 At the public hea 'n~ on Mav 27 2008 the oLnc'1 approved the ~biect A7, and CLIP reaLest_ 11. EDITS A. Drawings 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map 2. Site Plan (dated: 3/12/08 3. Landscape Plan (dated: '~ 1/~ 4. Elevations for Building A 5. Elevations for Buildings B & C 6. Colored Elevations for Buildings B & C (24 unit structure) 7. Elevations for Buildings D, E, & F 8. Elevations for Buildings G & H 9. Elevations for Building I 10. Floor Plans ofMulti-Family Units 11. Clubhouse Elevations & Floor Plan 12. Gazebo Elevations 13. Garage Buildings #1 & #7 -Elevations & Floor Plan 14. Garage Buildings #2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 -Elevations & Floor Plan B. Comments/Conditions of Approval 1. Planning Department (DRAFT) 2. Public Works Department 3. Fire Department 4. Police Department 5. Parks Department 6. Sanitary Service Company 7. Ada County Highway District ( C. Legal Descriptions & Exhibit Maps 1. Proposed Annexation Area 2. Proposed R-40 Boundary Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 23 (~(- k . ?1 'i +9 t t S ~~~ f f/.. t ;~ r ~`. ~.~ rye ~i f" li a ~'~ s i; ~~ ~, , i~~t ct < <~~ 1 e i~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Sw i ~1 1 l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i `1 , ( i CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 i i r 3. Proposed C-C Boundary D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code Regency at River Valley (revised) f A f E PAGE 24 f. i 5 ~~ s Vim... F ~r 1 ~ ~ ~`; ~ ;,, s ~ z s ~' ~ ~ ~, i t f ifi , ~'~ r p a d ~ ~ ~ 3 fv ~ ~ ~: ~ i, r~~ ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 A. Drawings 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 2. Site Plan (dated: A6 3/12/08 RF_ICFMFYATRl4/FR WA/.t.-F_Y ~ ~~ v~~j EJ a®DE~~~{. mtv48srK~~61w~L OC ~O~a ~~ 1~ Y _ _.._._.T,...~._.________-__-____-_s3~~a1..~._._.,~._4..~rr-r-~-__~. r.,___-___________.~ P.c I ~~~- I «.~,a~~ I `- f ~."°' '~ ~~ ~ T ~ .~„~ i j ~.~ C i ~ * ~ ~ _ `~ + ,ate: ~q, I r _ x 1 _~ ~ a: ! ~~'`~y$ f rmFw1Q ~~a,~mr°'a° I n^TMgs~°$m~er' r ~ ~ ~ df t I i ! ~ - °'~~' x~.~ cats t I.I ~' / >~ `~ ~ 40 1! ~ ~ ~ C ~ L •mi0 h9mD WlLLtImtII'DY e 1 ~,Iji 1 ~ i 1 ~~~ ~~ nvc+. ~u ( ' asn ~C'~~'w~us v~... ass ~ $ t~'Su' 9~ti .m amu _ ~ ____,__ I ~a~a ~~~ i ~ 1 ~ u~ ~ ~ _ ~ - g ~ ~L'ICS~~'+C6~~M~mr a~m0®a~ena ~~~ ~ ;: „, a " ~~ I !! i '*T ~~ _ i E ~C Ind. - v ,....c ~ Nr U.Y31&h& JF 4'#Xli -- --~- r rxaz~Pav€area am.,vf~ctiv a°A'°„"S~ ~°~~ +oa 4~~' ~.~ E'F i''!- ~"n ~~r n@..*.x~ c&mro rtex~ ta'T+ mom ~cunr mw W r iT--..'.,,. , ~•~ ~ • ~ , iw ~_ ~ ~ ~ " Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 3. Landscape Plan (dated: ~ 1/08 ii i~ j ~ ~ ~... F..o..~_.~~.. I ~' -- I a .~..~......m..mr~~ F v ~i + ~I ..~..~.v.ema......~.~~_.~..~m ________________ a a Jr rJ ~a ~ Exhibit A ctarac~ztr,~ sip Ply MKR4:N 9i, 2008 APAli'fM~t4T (SDtdh7UNITY --- ' C7EF81~IAN BDAHO `~~""' C... ~,m eQ4A~n'i~il U"dt4 __ B - _ _.~-- q,~ ~ , f`ym.A..n.,, SST t.vmc0 amkiy5mla t0'A Odan Gek"s+83~6e az r e m )' ~ 4 . ',L, ~ ~ ~ act3taraPa=+~ne~p y~ '~ S ~ ~ g~~ ~ ~ ~ :~• ~ u fm ~ `L+ ~~~, ~ ~ • i ~e _ .., _ ~r~, ~~ `'` '1zt _ '°'T W _ ' II ~ s ~ b -`e` ~ S _ _ H t ~ y ~1 pQR ~ - sn - 4/ ' ~ 1I~ I ~ C ~~w a~r~ri FQa~Arv ~ 8 ~ ~ l ~ ~ 4.. ~ ~. ~ is f x ( ~ ~ ' ~ ~ f ;~ 5 1 ~ ~ . i r 1 G 4`~~, i Z ~ 'r - ~ ~ ~ ?t ~ ;~ ~~ ~ { '.' i ~' I ; ~~~, F ~ ~,~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k ~ ~ i. '~ f '~ 1 . i a i L . ~ .x f~2 .F, 1 i T ~ a L ~ E , 4 r ~ q ~z~ s ~ j ~~ ~ ~ sf r „ i• y '~ ~ ~ _ 44 r ;~ H ~~ ~ ~ 1 5 ~ ~~'~ 4 ~ 1~J' I i ~ i ~` ~J ay ~ I~ ~' ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ - ~i t ~ ~~ I ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ t~~: ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ L ~ !' t; x ~ ~ . i t I ~ ~ . p' ; i. ' x ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ J I ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ 11 ~ ~ ' I ~' ~ ~ E r i ~ { ii i ~ ~ i { } ~ _ ~ ~ ~ n I I - ~ . ~ ` 3 S K ~ ~ t ~ ~ r ~ k j -.~ ~ ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 4. Elevations for Building A `~Q;E ElEVi7[~1• nESe E~E:~cnet+ m-~. AGM E~EVSnou ~* s¢~E Ercti~cnm+ m Exhibit A 4~~ -aa ~~°, a s ~~~ 9 z 0 ~a ~z rt~ ~m CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE ~G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 5. Elevations for Buildings B & C Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 6. Colored Elevations for Buildings B & C (24 unit structure) Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE RING DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 Elevations for Buildings D, E, & F Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 8. Elevations for Buildings G & H Exhibit A L~~l©_ ~aa. ., c FRGNT ELEb9F10lJ ~~w h~k _ s _s~v r ~ 7~~ _=at ~® p~i E~ I ~m cg f~ Z Y t°! ~~ ~~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 9. Elevations for Building I Exhibit A _'~~s _~~- ~' ~~ a ~~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 10. Floor Plans ofMulti-Family Units ~,~ ,I~ ~ ,,,,, ~~ ,' ~ ~~ .. ~ntmxnar P4GaOfa~ B4Il9Lpd 8<pn~ ,,,~ it_ ~s • ®~ m~ `°. ~; ~,~ ~ann~m @¢IIm _ ~4 T, J~wu NIW IO.Yt pss*En~ae ~L 3 BEDROOtd P11W ~J 2 H€DROaDA PiAN i ~ - i BCR _ a .p ~ Y'R46 `l ~ ~mm~ FF~ avcx~ ' eEtp4 E%ECUTIVE a ®~auoan auw 7 9EDR~OM PI1W 9fCME1 ~~ I,. I Mnr [ "~ If~(u~i~IrIF' ~° an V~Ir®t Wu9[AH'IItTJ.s t MaR ~~~ a e~ornmra mrw Exhibit A a ~n p~[ ~CA ~2 re CC9 t a~ Q !' f ~ ~ ' ~ ~~aa ~ f ~~,~ x5 ~ ~! '4 ~ t; ~ ~;' ~ 1 i i ~. ~ ~'' ~ ~ ~ t, F~~ i ~~ ~~ t ~~ '~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ t tE ~ s ~ x ~ P . t f S t'.f5' F I ~ .f~. ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ ` ~~ ~ ~ t V ! k `J { S f €f ~a, t r;~ t ` ~, i i ~ S A pp 4 I y ~i ~~q S -~ Y ~ j ' ~ i j j k ~ ~ ~ ,f A r i F ~ .F, i I " ra E }r ~~ ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ i I ~ ~ ff ., L'~ € - , G ~ ~' ~~ ~ ' i (~ i t j( 11t I `~ ~ p~{f ~ ~ '~ Y 3 . ~ 5Cr ~ 1 j' F' , 3~ j - 43 , ~ 5 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE ~G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 11. Clubhouse Elevations & Floor Plan 4E~@ID z =~ I ~ `~ ~~ ~ '.Y: .. - . .~ .Q. IL r•uxr ¢cv naa ea-~~.e~ vu4 ne.~~m~• ~~n i .! m~$9 : rt o~;g I I I I I ~ -- I I <~.vr ~ I ~ I-I I 111 II II II II II II II II II II II II II II III rn u n n u u n n u°° n u u u u l I I ~ I _ I I I HF9F9F 9F 9F9f~F9FgF9F9F 9F ~k~F~9H I I I I L__ - -~ ~ I J I I---- I wm~ -~ I I ~------- ---- --------+ I I I I I ® ON6~D PAY O ___ _ acs Pur I I I I I i I g 8 ~ ~ LJULI I N//~CfA llEP6 I I I 1 I -J ~ I...__ _____ CDAM oa~ L I WLLLWAY - ' r_____~ I ____ ____ ~ ji I I ~'~ ____ I I~ g! I _ ____.~ ____ ___ _ ____ y __^ - c RCN. I I @ I L ___ ----- =___ I I ~ ~ 1 4 _______~ P1~ r~ r ~ J _____ 8 I I I I A i~ I ~iROON ~ emrwa-m I I I -- j ~ I I I I j - I --- n I I I I I I I I I L___--T=J F - CI~ I OFFICE I I al pffrv _I I I I I I I. P. ~e;. I' Oytgp ~ ~ I I I I I I I ~ ___ _ _____ I r__ ~ __ I _-~_, I I ~„Ja, I ", "~ ~ I oFFiCE I I ~___ ____ I I I 1 _____.~ I _ I j ~ I I I I ~ - - I - I ~ nms I I I L _____ ______ r________ ~ I I 1 I I I eauwn I ~ I ~ a~mm svuw Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 12. Gazebo Elevations o fLaaF Plab m--~r ;a.~~s ~- ~ JI ~~ ~ 1~ ~~a~o :: ~..'. '? c. reux aE~Ynarv t~ ~~~cncn r~~ xrnc,~dnue~ Exhibit A __~ ~~ ,sW;:: e a~= ®~ pa{, ~Fd ii, fq Z Q yF W O gym{ (9 ~ is i t ~ ~~ ~Iy~}} ~~S ~ .ryaS. ~ ;_ a, I~ ~ t 1 €~ 1. 7f iY Y1~` J lSf ~ ~ ~ I~ r t ~. ~ f~ x t~ J _ } i t 4{ 1 4 ~ ~.. ~ ~ t ~ r ~ ,i ~ ~{~ ~ ~ xI ~ ;; ~ ~ try r , ,"'~~ ~?~(~ ~ ,~~ ,~ .,,~ ~~ ~~' '` . ~._ ~ _ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~, ) 4 _ _. ;~ j~ , ~ > x 4 ~. ~ ~ ~. ~ ~: ~ ~. ~ s ' ~ ,~ - o. ~ d If i k` ~ ~ ' ,~ s a ~ t' ~ -~ ~ ~,-~~ 'o S ~ Y ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 F 1 ~ ~ ~ t~ ~~ ~~ +~ ~ ~ °~ ~~ k= ~ ~ ~ t ~" > s is l a e r ~~ j i a Y~,'I: I '~ t } ~ r~s ~i ~ j 2 'rte } E 1~' a~ ~ y. i :~ . ~I~ - -~fu'_ '~ ~lr'~I~ ~x' e CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAG DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 13. Garage Buildings #1 & #7 -Elevations & Floor Plan rapar,8 FL~aF Pleb 4` ca---~~ a e ~i°a+~`tti Fa'8 M1aaH H4h+kr &a~, .-. Exhibit A =, _,~~ ~~i ~~ a a ~ ~ F ~ ° ee 4 i r3 S I' ~ I 1 F x k{ ~, p ~ '~ ~~ ~, 1 ~ e ~i ~ t F~ ` i i % b ~ ' ` ~ ` ~ - j ~ I u ~ _t { t' ~ ~ I . _ f ', ~~ S ~ S ` t1 ~ C ~- ~ ~ i ~t ~ ~~ 3~ 1~ ~ { l F ~ ` ,( ~ a ~ ~ ft ' ~ E ~ ' ! It iR ~1 1~ f ` ~ ! ~ .. t CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 14. Garage Buildings #2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 -Elevations & Floor Plans LEFT F].ES~~.il[~!a 'E'.~'~,Rl.T f i ; &IuFlT ELE~+~aTIz~W ^~-~~ 6E»R ELE'aaTll~A Ali ^. ~' •E- T.~~ c >vv- T .. r. ~, _ -fir - " ~_ ~j -~i. T-E 1•E _ ~ - sWulrr nE~: snub +~--~* a,3: =s~r s ~;-_ 'i ~' ~~ P~ ~~ (~ ~ Ear x n: ~°r .~ ~~~ tit-. - qp ~ 'T ,~ ® ~ g -~R-T-E ATE ,~ Q ~i w ~~ w~ Q® 4Fa~E FLpr,,k FL:f. p_~~i6 Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~NMN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 B. texts/Conditions of Approval 1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT (DRAF17 1.1 Annexation & Zoning Comments 1.1.1 The legal description submitted with the application (stamped on June 14, 2006 by Darin Holzhey, PLS) is accurate and meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and Idaho State Tax Commission 1.1.2 The applicant's request for annexation and zoning of 10.56 acres to R-40 is approved. The applicant's request for annexation and zoning of 1.5 acres to C-C is net approved. 1.1.3 Prior to annexation ordinance approval, the applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City. Said Development Agreement shall be signed within ~ ~ of the City Council's approval of this application. See section 10 above for analysis and comments regarding the Planning Department recommended Development Agreement provisions. 1.2 Site Specific Requirements -Conditional Use Permit 1.2.1 The site plan, labeled as Sheet 1 of 1, prepared by Mason & Stanfield, Inc., stamped by Scott Stanfield on Ag 3/12/08, is ne€ approved with the conditions stated herein. ~* ~~^°* ~ ^ -'--~~ t ~ /"~,. 1. ~ tTO-i~ 9~; E1~2-~3" ~E 1 7'z r'-uad . All comments of the accompanying Annexation & Zoning (AZ-08-003) application shall also be considered conditions of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP-08-004). 1.2.2 The landscape plan, prepared by Bach Homes, dated 1/08, is approved with the following modifications/notes: a. Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer is required along the future extension of E. River Valley Road. IfNMID will not allow landscaping (i.e. trees) within their easement for the Downey Sublateral and if there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the street buffer, the applicant shall provide an additional S-foot wide stria for landscaping outside of the NMID easement. per UDC II-3B-7CIb; b. Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer is required along Allys Way; c. Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 35-foot wide street buffer will be required along Eagle Road/SH 55, an entryway corridor (upon development of the commercial portion of the site when annexed). d. A 25-foot wide buffer shall be provided alone the east side of the C-C zoned portion of the site adiacent to the multi-family development, and alone the south side of the C C zoned portion of the site IF a residence exists at the time of CZC submittal e. Per UDC 11-3B-8C, a 5-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer is required adiacent to parl~ne and vehicular use areas alone the north boundary of the site and adiacent to the ezistine residence on the west boundary of the site Said buffer is reauired to be planted with one tree per 351inear feet and shrubs lawn, or other veeetative around cover. f. Include mitigation details for the 9 existing trees on the site, consisting of 120 caliper inches, proposed to be removed, in compliance with UDC 11-3B-10. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 g. Per UDC 11-4-3-27, all street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundation. The foundation landscaping shall meet the following standards: • The landscaped area shall be at least 3-feet wide; • For every 3 linear feet of foundation, an evergreen shrub having a minimum mature height of 24 inches shall be planted; and • Ground cover plants shall be planted in the remainder of the landscaped area. h. A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway and bridge over the South Slough shall be provided on the site in accordance with the Parks Department conditions contained below in Section 5, the standards in the Master Pathways Plan, and UDC 11-3A-8. Where the applicant has submitted a preliminary landscape plan and where staff has reviewed such plan, the landscaping shall be consistent with the preliminary plan with modifications as proposed by staff. The proceeding modifications and notes should be shown on a revised landscape plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application(s). 1.2.3 ~e-1'-~vate~treefappllE~tie~fvr~~~~~,ti' ~•• •~-• a ~ n ' aa~ rnru~g-c~ev~g-c9~a:va crCr~aacsmcccmo Twenty-six foot wide private streets shall be constructed within this development in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. Further, the applicant shall comply with all of the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4 for private streets 1.2.4 The applicant must either install wheel stops for all parking adjacent to sidewalks or landscaping or the sidewalk or landscape area maybe widened 2 feet to allow for vehicle overhang, and the stall length maybe reduced by 2 feet (from 19' to 17'), per UDC 11-3C-SB. 1.2.5 Bicycle parking is required to be provided on the site. Per UDC 11-3C-6G, 1 bicycle parking space is required for every 25 proposed vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof. 1.2.6 The applicant should submit a letter from Nampa Meridian Irrigation District the ' documenting that they are amenable to relocating the Downey Sublateral and easement that currently ezists along the southern boundary of the site. If NMID is not amenable to relocating the easement, the site plan shall be revised so that structures are located outside of the easement Additionally, if NMID will not allow landscaping (~.e. trees) within their easement and there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the required street buffer along River Valley Road, an additional S foot wide strip shall be provided for street buffer landscaping. Fl~vr+l~nmraritc ~' ~ a Tmn 11 ~r+ ~ ~+l,o.. o~+e.a. _. _ _~. r --- 1.2.10 The applicant shall dedicate right-of--way and construct Allys Way in accordance with ACRD standards, in alignment with Allys Way north of the site, on the north side of Ustick Road. A stab sweet driveway shall be constructed for emer~ency access only to/from the site to/from Allys Way that meets the Fire Department's turning radius requirements stated below in #3.3. 1.2.13 Per UDC 11-3A-6, all irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, and waterways being used as amenities, that intersect, cross or lie within the area being subdivided shall be covered. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department prior to construction plan approval. If lateral users association approval can not be obtained, alternate plans will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~NM~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 1.2.16 All signage for the site requires approval of a sign permit. All signage must comply with UDC 11-3D-8I and 11-3D-10, Table 2, for subdivision identification signs. 1.2.17 An underground, pressurized irrigation system shall be installed to all landscape areas within the development per the approved specifications and in accordance with UDC 11-3A-15 and MCC 9- 1-28. 2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2.1 Sanitary sewer service to this development is being proposed via extension of mains in North Eagle Rd. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; the applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Water service to this site is being proposed via extension of mains in N Eagle Road. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 2.3 The applicant shall provide a 20-foot common lot for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way. The common lot shall be covered with a blanket easement to the City of Meridian. 2.4 The applicant shall provide a 20-foot easement for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easements shall not be dedicated via a plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. 2.5 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, asingle-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to issuance of building permits. 2.6 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to issuance of building permits. 2.7 All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, alternate plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Meridian City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. 2.8 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PL?DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 2.9 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.10 Street signs aze to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed, drainage lots constructed, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 2.11 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to issuance of building permits 2.12 All development improvements, including but not limited to sewer, fencing, micro-paths, pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. 2.13 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to issuance of building permits 2.14 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.15 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.16 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.17 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.18 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.19 The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations aze set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of the multifamily buildings is at least 1-foot above. 2.20 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.21 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standazds. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.22 One hundred watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights shall be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations aze at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior to commencing installations. 3. FQiE DEPARTMENT 3.1 Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Fire Department and water quality by the Meridian Water Department for bacteria testing. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 3.2 Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department. a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 %" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle. b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it. c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works specifications. d. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on corners when spacing permits. e. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'. f. Fire hydrants shall be place 18" above finish grade. g. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements of the IFC Section 509.5. h. Show all proposed or existing hydrants for all new construction or additions to existing buildings within 1,000 feet of the project. 3.3 All common driveways shall be straight or have a fuming radius of 28' inside and 48' outside and shall have a clear driving surface which is 20' wide. The ~~-~ n~~~-•*-•-~ ~ ~- ~. ~.• ~„ .. .. a;, a' .,..ate fi .... .. + ~i. ~ •a r t~e~~e Ts-nrth ~w ~. a• ~ +1. Tr' '•' b ~~cmPvrorS a,.,.~..~~ ...,.,.+ a ~~~~ w~~~u ~ ~~~~~~~ 3.4 Operational fire hydrants, temporary or permanent street signs and access roads with an all weather surface are required before combustible construction is brought on site. 3.5 To increase emergency access to the site a minimum of two points of access will be required for any portion of the project, which serves more than 50 homes. The two entrances should be separated by no less than % the diagonal measurement of the full development. The applicant shall provide a stub street to the property from Allys Way at the east boundary of the site. See fire code 503.1.2 for multi-family developments over 200 units. The applicant has revised the site elan to include an emergency access to All s Way; however in order for this to meet the aforementioned reauiremen a street connection needs to be provided either north to Ustick or through the CenterCal project to Fairview 3.6 Commercial and office occupancies will require afire-flow consistent with the International Fire Code to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed per Appendix D. 3.7 The fire department requests that any future signalization installed as the result of the development of this project be equipped with Opticom Sensors to ensure a safe and efficient response by fire and emergency medical service vehicles. This cost of this installation is to be borne by the developer. 3.8 Maintain a separation of 5' from the building to the dumpster enclosure. 3.9 Provide a Knox box entry system for the complex prior to occupancy. 3.10 The first digit of the Apartment/Office Suite shall correspond to the floor level. 3.11 The Fire Dept. has concerns about the addressing of the existing house and the address being visible from the street which the project is addressed off of. Please contact the Addressing Specialist at 898-5500 to address this concern prior to the public hearing. 3.12 Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet (122 m) from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the code official. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183). a. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m). Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 b. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m). 3.13 All R-2 occupancies with 3 or more units shall be required to be fire sprinklered. 3.14 There shall be a fire hydrant within 100' of all fire department connections. 3.15 Buildings over 30' in height aze required to have access roads in accordance with The International Fire Code Appendix D Section D105. The 26' wide roads shall be required to be a maz of 30' from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The fire sprinkler system is required to be upgraded to a NFPA 13; contact the Fire Department. 3.16 Emergency response routes and fire lanes shall not be allowed to have speed bumps. 3.17 Pool chemicals shall be stored in compliance with the Inten~ational Fire Code. 3.18 Multi-Family and Commercial projects shall be required to provide additional 60" wide access point to the building from the fire lane to allow for the movement of manual fire suppression equipment and gurney operations. The unobstructed breaks in the pazking stalls shall be provided so that building access is provided in such a manner that the most remote part of a building can be reached with a length of 150' fire hose as measured azound the perimeter of the building from the fire lane. Code complaint Handicap pazking stalls may be included to assist meeting this requirement. Contact the Meridian Fire Department for details per IFC Section 504.1. 3.19 Private streets are required within the development for addressing purposes. 4. POLICE DEPARTMENT 4.1 The Police Department has no concerns related to the site design submitted with the application. 5. PARKS DEPARTMENT 5.1 Applicant shall construct the sidewalk along the north side of River Valley Street as a 10-foot wide, detae~ie~multi-use pathway. A detached pathway is strongly preferred, pending approval by ACl3D and NMID. Applicant shall cover the cost of replacing the detached pathway if necessary due to future irrigation facility maintenance 5.2 Applicant shall construct u;.,o,. v,.ne., ~+,.eo+ .,„a +~,e ,.oa,...+~.._ L~a__ the sidewalk along the west side of Ally's Way as a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway. 5.3 Applicant shall construct a 5-foot wide minimum multi-use pathway through proiect connecting between River Valley Street and the pedestrian bridge Applicant shall maintain the 5-foot path section and sign it for public access 5.4 Applicant shall design a pedestrian crossing at the South Slough/Finch Lateral, secure necessary permits from the irrigation district and City floodplain administrator, prepaze cost estimates, and provide fiends in a trust for half the cost of constructing the crossing. 5.5 All pathways, except as noted in these conditions of approval shall be built to the minimum standazds published in the Comprehensive Pazks & Recreation System Plan, pgs. 3-2 through 3-4, sections B and C. 5.6 An easement shall be provided for public access to and maintenance of the pathways. The City will not assume maintenance of the pathway until it connects from one major arterial road to another, unless otherwise agreed to by the Parks & Recreation Department. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 6. SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY pavaFs~38iH~$~-T~IPttLiJc-~ r~nrra~~l. ~ +L. .~ ,.,7;~ +' '~ ~ - - TF 41.0 :1-0 1 ,.] a a L t c- J Z Y f The site elan has been revised to comely with SSC reauirements 7. ADA COUNTY HIGAWAY DISTRICT In response to your request for comment on VAR-08-002, the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) Planning Review staff has reviewed the submitted application and site plan. It has been determined that there are no site specific requirements for you at this time due to the fact that: • This development will generate less than 10 vehicle trips per day (VTD). If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACRD Planning Review will review the site plan and may require improvements to the transportation system at that time. • Prior to final approval you will need to submit construction plans to the ACRD Development Review Department to insure compliance with the conditions identified above or for traffic impact fee assessment. This is a separate review process that requires direct plans submittal to the Development Review staff at the Highway District. • A traffic impact fee maybe assessed by ACRD and will be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Contact ACRD Planning & Development Services at 387-6170 for information regarding impact fees. 7.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval 7.1.1 Comply with requirements of ITD and City of Meridian for the Eagle Road (SH-55) frontage. Submit to the District a letter from TTD regarding said requirements prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Contact the District III Traffic Engineer at 334-8340. 7.1.2 In the right-of--way to be provided by the development to the south, construct the portion of River Valley Street abutting the site's south property line as a half street section with a minimum 24- feet of pavement, vertical curb and gutter on the north side, and a 3-foot gravel shoulder with a barrow ditch on the south side of the roadway. 7.1.3 Dedicate a minimum of 40-feet ofright-of--way from the east property line out to Eagle Road for the construction of River Valley Street prior to plans approval or issuance of a building permit. 7.1.4 Construct a 10-foot wide multiuse pathway along the south boundary of the site, inside a public sidewalk easement, north of and parallel to River Valley Street. Pipe the Stokesberry Lateral wherever it runs between the path and the River Valley Street right-of--way. If any portion of the Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~NNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 path lies within an irrigation easement, the sidewalk easement shall be recorded prior to the irrigation easement. 7.1.5 In the right-of--way to be provided by the development to the south, construct the portion of River Valley Street between the site's southwest corner and Eagle Road as an off-site street improvement, with a minimum of 24-feet of pavement and minimum 3-foot gravel shoulders and borrow ditches on either side. 7.1.6 Provide ACRD with a road trust deposit for one-eighth of the cost of installing a traffic signal and full intersection improvements at Eagle Road /River Valley Street. 7.1.7 Construct Allys Avenue intersecting River Valley Street at the east property line as a complete collector street section with vertical curb, gutter, and 7-foot attached concrete sidewalk. Extend the section from River Valley Street to the south easement line of South Slough irrigation ditch. Dedicate 64-feet ofright-of--way containing the constructed portion of Allys Avenue by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of--way dedication after receipt of all requested material. 7.1.8 Construct an emergency access on Allys Avenue approximately-140-feet north of River Valley Road. Install a restrictive device to allow emergency access only (i.e. gates, bollards, etc.) to be approved by the Fire Department 7.1.9 To accommodate the extension of Allys Avenue across the South Slough irrigation ditch, either: a. Provide ACRD with a road trust deposit for one-half of the cost of constructing the crossing of the South Slough irrigation ditch at the northern terminus of Ally's Avenue, or b. Construct a bridge over South Slough and extend Ally's Avenue as a full collector street section to the north bank. One-half the cost of the bridge construction maybe used to offset the road trust deposit required in condition 6 for the signalization of the Eagle Road/River Valley Street intersection. 7.1.10 Locate the western driveway on River Valley Street no closer than 500-feet east the centerline of Eagle Road. Construct it as a curb return with minimum 15-foot radii, 46-feet wide (back-of curb to back-of--curb) with a center island, and paved its entire width and at least 30-feet into the site 7.1.11 Locate the eastern driveway on River Valley Street no closer than 175-feet from the western driveway or the intersection of Allys Avenue (near-edge to near-edge). Construct it as a curb return with minimum 15-foot radii, to be no greater than 36-feet wide (back-of curb to back-of- curb), and paved its entire width and at least 30-feet into the site. 7.1.12 Coordinate all germane design and timeline functions with ITD, ACRD, the adjacent property owners, and Meridian City concerning the connection and alignment of River Valley Street to Eagle Road. 7.1.13 Provide access (and all necessary easements) to all adjacent pazcels with frontage on Eagle Road to ensure them future access onto River Valley Street through the site. 7.1.14 Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. 7.2 Standard Conditions of Approval 7.2.1 Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of--way. 7.2.2 Private sewer or water systems aze prohibited from being located within any ACRD roadway or right-of--way. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA>~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 7.2.3 All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 7.2.4 Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that maybe damaged. during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 7.2.5 Comply with the District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy. 7.2.6 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five yeazs old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 7.2.7 All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepaze and certify all improvement plans. 7.2.8 The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 7.2.9 Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7.2.10 Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #200, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 7.2.11 It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACRD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact ACRD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACRD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 7.2.12 No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they aze in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 7.2.13 Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. TL., 7.7„L.,. T«.. ..t +' epa t ti. ,7 los+ a ~L. !~ ~. ,] + ' tel '1c ~nno ~ . ~ ' ~Fl xhi~ ~nnlia.~ti - T1, t,.,4 ` +1,.,~ .. _c~L - -" -' Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 C. Legal Descriptions & Exhibit Maps 1. Proposed Annexation Area ~fJ1V' ~ ~'f`,4N»"I>~LD, INC. ~°i~~.~~sse®av.~ ~'~av,s, .Lam ~t~gv~re~.~s & ~*~.,~,--r~v.~ ~~~ ~nrn-~-s ~~rnwg.t, inABO ~sos FOR: Bath Builders J(:~B I+I®.: N~11205 ~ArE; April f ~, zenta R~~ Alv~rrr,~t,~-~oly I'Rl}PERTY t)ES+CftIP'TIAN ~~'rE~'DNfile BY 1tEC®RA BAli'A F'tx: ~~ 494-079 >rrnait: d@otztte~*~gmsersg,ug A parcel Qf lend being a portian of the SW 1 /4 NW' t/4 of So~oa 4, `To~msl~ip 3 Nc~th, R~tge 1 B~st,l3oisc Meridian; City of Meridian, Ada C..ounty Idaho, ~ shower on that certain Rs~ard of Survey 1410.6638, recorded as InstrtmterrY 14Ia. 1 (?4124¢1 8 on Sc~tr 28, 2{-Q4 is tics Qflxcc of the Recorder of Ada Jaunty, ids, by Aadtrsars $urt~ey t:rrotsg, Inc. fcrr Brian Weiss, more cafarly described as folhs~vs: '~ ~g at the NVd comer of said SW' I P4 NW I/4, (North 1116 causer eom~nan to seetienc A and S~, $aid cower bears S, tl0° 3b° Q$" W., a distance of 1241.17 feet fxosn the i+1W earner ofsaid 5r~tian 4; "f`~ce S. ttD° 36' 11" W., a distmsce of 176.26 feet„ (formerly Sot~a}, along the ~~esterly boundary ~+f said SW 114 NW 114 kt the 1~lINT (~~' BE+GIlVNI'NG; 7'tien~ S. 89° 23' 49" B., a distance of 711.ti0 (fprmerly Iaast}. to a goi~ oa the easterll+ of that certain ~'arraugi 73oed girded as No:95fl18434 im the O~tce of the Recorder of Ada C~rxAUnty, Idaho, said point monumented with a found SI8 irsch diameter uvn pin >~~ "ASG Plw7 3'314"4 atang rise borsnd.~ry of send Record ®f S»rvey No. C:638 the following courses and . 'llsence txtstiRtuing S, $9° 23' 49" >s., a distance of 230.t3Q (far~tterly E,a~~, to a found 518 inch diameter iron gin marked "ASG PLS 7314". N. titl° 3G' I 1 ~ E., a distance of 218.fl8 feet, ~$ormerly Nct~ 2 i B.tIS feet), t®a point art the southerly boundary of that certain of Heirs", +Cs~ No: SF 11~ fl3tM52tlM, re~srded as Ne.194fl47C)79 inn the O.~e+e afthe Rertsrder of Ada Gotmty, ltlaho, said fiat ` S. a0° 36` I I ~` V4i., a of 40.QQ feet ~ a found 5A8 iuclt iron pin marked "ASCaP1 S 1314"; '(hence cotstinuing along the bcsuudary of sad Rectsrd of Survey Na. 6638 artd along iho soudteriy boundary of said t No.104047079 !>te foIlovvusg carrrses and distrinces: 1~ence lv, 84° 26" 1 I"B., a distaHe~ of 17.43 fit, (fora¢eriy i+l. 83° 50'E.) to a paust; Exhibit C ~i li ~ ~ ,~ ~.1 3- ~~ f' i i' . `i i i ~'i i ~ 's, i ., i i 5. CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~NMN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 I~tnspsv tic Sd!'A1-77[gp Gw» Pt~~ Es, l e~ ~Std~t~~'v .ft P~aue' k'agt 2 at 3 $~ch BuGldera Matti P~mily-N~°1205'jr11e~}s~.Revisesd Annea.d 1~ettce S. 6fi° 18° 49" ~., a distar» of 264.1111 fect,(formerly S. bta° 55'E.), to a pa~ini, said p+aini referenced S. 45° 26' 1 i" Qv'., a distance caf ~~. feet with ~ found $18 inch .diameter irpn pin marked "A5G PLS 7314"; Theatre S. 34° 48' 49" E., a distance of 227.?f} feel.(forr~rlp S. 35° 25'E.}, to €~ Point, said point refneed S. 8C>° 44' 15" Vd., a distance of l 1.511 feei with a found 518 inch diameter Iran ,Pin n~ark~l "ASG Pi~4 7314"r S. 71 ° 3 6' 49" E., a dist~tce of I32.t1Q feet,(ftnrffierly 5.71 ° 55'E. }, to ~ f®uaid 5J8 inab diameter irc~tt pin marked "ASG 1'LS 7'314", Thence S. $5° 33' 4y" ~., a d' of 174.90 feet,(famlcrly S. 8tS° l4'Pr.), to a point, said paint referenced S. 27° 42' 23" ~V., a distance of 3t}.Uf} feet with a foutyd 518 diameter van pin marked "ASG P~ 7314"; Thence S. 4Q° 43' 49" 1;., n distance of364.98 feet, (fana~ly S, 41° 2L1'p., a distance of 36~.3C1 feet, to a found 518 inch eiameter iron Pim marked "ASG PLS 7314"; Thettre S. 72° 58' 4J~ E., a distamae of 99.29 fi~,(fon~rll+ S. 73° 35'T., a distatr,ce of 98.34 feet.}, to a pmitri on the easterly boundary of seed 5QV 114 NR~ 114, said pt~int wit$+essed S. Qti° 4Ci'48'~ 1~°., a distance of 2.O.Qb feet with a found 518 incB diameter iran Pin marked "A5G PLS '7314" Thent~ leaving tltc southerly boundary ®f said Iasiruntent R1a. 104t?47079 and contiuouing along the of said Record of Survey lido. +~638p 5. (1~° 40'48' Pl., a distance of 111.65 feet,(for~rly fiouth a distan+~ of 112;819 fc~t~, alor~ the easterly boundary ®fsaid S~ I14 NW 114 to the 5E ccxaer of said d~V 114 N~V I/4, (tenter rat iflf cosnc~r~ said crsme~r mgrtented v+~ith ra f®ttnd 518 incb diameter ircnn pin marked "PAT PI,S 4347"; Thence N. 89° 45" 21" W., a distance of 978.27 fe+et,(farmerly V,~est a duce of 999.24 feet), alone; the southerly beimydary of said SVd' i14 I~dW 114 to a found 518 inch iron pin marked "~G 7314" which bases S. 89° 45' 21" )r., a distance of 350.00 feet from the SW career of said S'4~ 114 NW 114,(114 wtaer common to sc~ticros 4 and 5}; Thenr.e N. 011° 36' 11" E., a distattee of I80.O0 fact, fformerlX North, to s found 518 inch diameter irtan pin marked "ASG PI.S ?314`'; N. 89° 45' 21" @V.~ a di of 49.86 fcets(fay West}, to a p®intt an the easterly of that certaidn Warranty rceorded as No. 774180b in the AfPce +~f the Recc-rder of Ada Coutuy, Idaho, said Point tttonumented with a found 518 ittcb diameter iron pin nmrked "ASt a PLS 73 I4"; Ind. ~° 36' l 1" E.y a distaac~ of 145,(10 fcet, (formerly North}, along the easterly bntmdary of s~.id eni No. 774180b to a point, said point r~ritaessed S. 00° 36' 1 i" VV., a distance ®f l .00 faazt with a fc-ttnd 518 inch diameter iron pin. tnarkeal "ASG PLS 7314"; Exhibit C CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNI~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 I~IT01.fi10.'~iYL L!'+ ed31r'~RS, 1A117a.~$'R4'E~(1f~' 8t ,~,iaYa1~'JP$' Pe8s3 oi3 61~ch l~ u'"Iders, Motto Fami7~ 1 ZQS~~rw~r~l~~Is~R~vis~ Aanex.doc ~ INT. it9° 4S° ~ l" i~., a distance cif 230. l4 fee_t,(ft~rmerly West slang the northerly bo~undaay oi` said ln~trotnont 1rPc~. 77411; tt+ a p©lrrt on the ~tesly bo ~f that mid ~J`arranty Decd ltrume~tt i+V~cr. ,.901 X434, said ~-,nt a~at~num~t~l t~ith n found SA$ iazo~ diarn~eter iron pin ~r~~d F1 .k 67V ~1d67 13 ~ V ~9 Thea~ce cor~~,g Pv'_ $9® 45' ~I'~ P+l., a distance of ?O.dU feet= along the extension ofsaid noatherly lk~undary t~ a paint on ttee w~tec°ly boundary of said ~ W l l4 NW 1148 Thence h9.04'~ 36' 11" ~.? a diel~r~ce of 218.94 fern aloa~g the easterly ho~darlr of said Vtran~ty~ Imp t 1~ci~.9501>3434 to the I~pII1VT tl~' ~I~~IQoiAIIATG. This patrol rorrtains 13.06 awes m+'rc: or less. All ~c~rding, to the rrd oaf suraep as recorded in the t3~a~ ~$~e .~da Cc~ty Retarder. ~~ti~.T~(,°I° Tom: All existing riglsts of way and easements e~f recxtrd or implied aprin~, +an the wive-~desrribtad pareel caf land. This Legal , titan r~,s written r~vit}tAUt the bt;ne~t t+f an ~tuml bo~tlar3r s~t.~rey, The ctat~es slactwn hewn wens ~ frearrt that Main Record of Str~c}~ for `638", Recorded as 1 soot X10. °°1 G412481 g~* in ~ C~ice of the Recordtrr of Ada ~, Idahci. ~Y ,125' Exhibit C .~ 4 Itj i ~ ~ ~ ~ F E~ ; ; ~~ . i ~ f li ~ ] ~ y. ~ ~ '. ~ ~ as ~ ~ 1 ' ~~ ~ i i ~ a ~ 4 @'~ Z i ~ ' ~ ~ ~. t i `,~ ~ ~' `. ~ ~ + '~ 1 J ? ~~11' ~. ~ ~ 1. ~S ~. ~ !+ 4 ! ~ ~' ~ - ~ .;~ ' 4 ~ } t. i 1! M1 Y . u ~ ~ ~i ~ k Y i~ EY i, ~ 1 ~ } r ~ l{ ~~ Y~ ~. ~ T ~ E a ~ k ~. i , ~ _ { ~~j 1 I E j CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA,NNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR TIC HEA~G DATE OF MAY Z0, 2008 3~~ y3 ~ _.. a .~~T,~;,k FICP~~ ~' ~~ ~:` ~:~~ ~~ ~q , ~ jR f figflsk~g erA _ _ _ _ _ ~. t3.43' L!~ ~$aI$y[ a ti~T/iN[$ ~ i ,~~ ~ ' ~~ . L~ ~'~~''~ ~~'26"4Il"i.~ ~Q:l~ fS7 ;Stp ~ ~," ` '~~~3` g. _ L3 _ ~Ei'a'~G'15 a1 . sY ~ ..~ ~ , rw _ ~ JF _, ~ -- ~ ~o. ~ ;. ..~ ~~ ~~ ; -~ ,~ . ~.~~~ ~g ~ ~,~ Vii.. ~q~. ~-~ ~R ~~` ~,, ° ;~ ~ ~ .. ,,-~ ~~ r ~_ r j ~+a1 i~ mod" R~eViE1M AL BY r~ a~~ ~~ !1~! 2 5 -. ~ ~ At(z#~9~9AN PtJ~t.iG ~s+~€~iES s~~Pti: r 1~1~ ~ ~~ 6~~~~~ ~, 1~ ~ ~ _ ~ a$ M. t. w. ~g~Tt~ ~ild7s'~ c;d3 rvv74Yr~:rixi<irl4 vur~d S/~ at~Cta ~~. ,agra ~~ ~~~c~"p~ ~ "w~ t vL~ r v'+ ~'$", 6GPl1E~~~ Cs~~T6tMlev'•6i . f#~apE?'S 4'~ ~I~J ~E~$ ~QT4'R~.F ~~ rffe'G'f~~E7iLE rtcprt;~r:~arf .. ~.. ~. - - - «f3~~'FG!9 iii Exhibit C ,. ~ ~1~ i !~ ~ ' } ~' '1 4 ~t~ 1 Q4. ~ 1 Aa i, € ~ r} 11 ~ 7 ~, ~: ~` z ~ ~r ~' ~~` .i tt: , 3 ~ T,I ~: ~ ,K ~StDy'1 c ~~ r~ i~+rw9 • I , r I aYl~,.ti,h CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 Z. Proposed C-C Boundary ~~ Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors and Planners .~ L~~~d ~~~ (nc. Ph (20 ) 454-0256~Fax (208)~454097~9 e-mail: dl~alzhey~amsenc.us FOR: Bach Builders JOBNO.: NV1205 DATE: June 8, 2006 ANNEXATION PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1 A parcel of land being a portion of the SW 1/4 NW 114 of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho, as shown on that certain Record of Survey No. 6638, recorded as Instrument No. 104124018 on Sept. 28, 2004 in the Office of the Recorder of Ada. County, Idaho, by Anderson Survey Group, Inc. for Brian 9~eiss, mole particularly described as follows: Commencing at the SW comer of said SWl/4 NW114, (Wl/4 comer of Section 4), said corner monumented with a brass disk; Thence N. 00° 36' 08" E. a distance of 543.94 feet along the westerly boundary of said S W 1/4 NWl/4 to the POINT OF BEGINNING,; Thence S. 89° 23' S2" E. a distance of ?0.00 feet perpendiailar to said westerly boundary to a point monumented with a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence continuing S. 89° 23' S2" E. a distance of 230.Q0 feet to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence S. 00° 33' S4" BV. a distance of 217.06 feet to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence, N. 89° 45' 23" W. a distance of 230.15 feet parallel with the southerly boundary of said SW 1/4 NWl/4 to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence, N. 89° 45' 23" W. a distance of 70.00 feet parallel with the southerly boundary of said SVJI/4 N~Vl/4 to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence N. 00° 36' 1 I" E a distance of 218.94 fcet parallel with the westerly boundary of said SWl/4 NWl/4 to the PO]aVT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 1.50 acres more or less. Also, this parcel is subject to all easements andrights-of--way of record or implied. Exhibit C f ~ ~ ~ ~ r t } ' ~ 1 f ~ ~ t 1 t ~ ~ ~ ~ i1 y zj Et FF I 1 I f ~ 1 ~ 4 ,. N4 ~ S t ~ ~ i f ~ ~i i ~ i'~ ~1~ S ~ t , '~i ' ~ ` . ~ , ~ ~ . ~ ~ €~ ~'I Ei ~ 2 ~ ~ i;~ ; f , g . g . ~ p ~ ~ ;~` ~ i. ~~; ~ -3 ~ 6 i, ; ~: f i ; - ~ y ,~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~: t {`~ ' is t p } . 1Pt P ti ~ 1 ~ r ~. ~ i P~ t 4 ~ ~- ~~ i. ~ i ~ ?' ~ ~ ~ P': ` f: l k ~,.. ~, ~~ i i ~ I i ~ k ~ Ff~~i ~ lfki ~ ~ Y ~ '~ ~ ~` 1. ~ ~-i ~ i. ~~ p p j~ , ! ~ ! ~s. ~` I. ~~ ~ i ~ . ('~~ i ~ '. ~. ~- ~f ~ ~. ~~ ~ t Gib ~ t,:, ~ ~~f~ ~~ !. ': CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNI~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 ~~~ 3:: ~3 " 1 c- ~~ d I I Pr~ilt~lT ~`~~r:EL 1 ' ~ 0.0. _ ~~~ _ '7.7_ ~ ,4`-;~3 ~_ 3.i9a 1 -i. CC W i-~~ LtA r _~. ~ ~ ~ f ~ r~ ~ _ ~ - .~ - U.i ~ c., ~ 1 ~=~ I ~_~ CL rra Lr' , ~ r r`i i~ i _ _ k :~~ ~~~ y~ - rr~"~"~`~ ~ ~~- ~ ~ -- lrui a ,; tr X 5 - [i ~~ ' i , , G 1 . _ ' .~ L=, 'qla ` ~. ~' + =r i ~, i e. - , r'~ ~ ~r-r r~E~_~ ,~ -.-,_b __-, L~1;E _ ~ARCk3 C1=7P~d_[ ~ i i ~ f+ - ' i. ~ f A~3 LS 73:.t . A'~;s ~'a X374 r __ _ s_ ________a _ ____ k~ 1+4 L7r. ~_ _ l~4~i B~II,LlA,Efi'~i ~SC?`1 c r -_ _ _ ~~n~s ~1~, T~Q voQ tea'. ~.,~ ~ ~~~ Exhibit C CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNI~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 3. Proposed R-40 Boundary ~~®~ Wrofessional Engineers, L..and Surveyors and Planners ~~ ~ j~~f~ C-'rc- ~ . 3t4 sofa St. Caldwe(I, !® 636016 Ph (2t}8) 454-0266 Fax 2fl8) 464-0979 e-snail: olhalrJ~ rez ser{ °.~ FRAPIRTY DESCRtP'iTf3lN PAI2C~,L 2 -yd A pal of land being a portion of the SW li4 IVW 1l4 of Section 4x Township 3 North, Range l F..ast, Boise Meridian, City ofMeridianb Ada County Ida&o, as shown on tl~t certaia Record of Survey l~Io. 6638, recorded as Instrument Igo. 194124018 on 28, 20Q4 iQ the l3ffice ~af the Re~oxcler of Ada County, Idaho, 63' Andcrsan 5trtro~ey Cimup, inc. for Brian Weiss, more pmticularly descra°bed as follows: ' Commencing at ills SW corner of said SW i/4 NWlf4, W 1/4 comer of Section 4), said ~srner monumnnted wlih a brass disk; Thence S, 89° 45' 23" E. a distance of 3SO.OI fit to the PtIIlMiTT QIiF 1e3EGI1'+1lrTilv~, said point n°- with a found 5/!3-sash disa~n+eter iron pin; Thence N. 00° 35' 08" E. a distance of l St3.flf1 feet parallel with the w~€erly bomic#ary of said SW 114 NVV 114 to a tieund ~~f8-inch diametor irr-n pica; Thence 11T. 89° 45' 23" W. a distaa~ce of 49.86 feet Parallel with the southerly boundary of said SW lt'4 NWlf4 to a found SI&ineh diameter iron p~ Thence N. UO° 36' d8" E. a distance of 145.00 feet parallel with the westerly bo of said SAr 114 N1N l P4 to m found 5,'8-inela diamet~s imn pin; Thence l`I.90~ 33' S4" E. a distanro of 23 ?.f}GG feet to a famed Sf8-iach diar~ter iron pin; TI-ence N. 0(}° 36' 08" ~, a distance of 218,(}8 feet ,parallel with the westerly botmdaay of said S W 1 i4 NW l!4 to a point that fills in the South Slough; Thence along said South Slough the follavwing courses rrnd distance; Thence N, 84° 25' 08" E. a distance of 17.43 feet to a Point;, Thence S. 66° 18' S2" E. a of 254.Qa fit to a Pxaint; Thence S. 34° 48' S2" E. a distance of 22'f.7f1 feet to a paints Thence S. 71 ° l6' S2" E. s sf 132:90 feet m a paint; Thence S. >35° 33 ° 52°' E, a distance of 174.90 feet to a point; Them S. 40° 43" 52" E. a dish of 354.98 feet to a point; Exhibit C ~, t ~~~ 1 ~~ ~ 'I ~' ~ ~ , z { i, ~ I~ ,i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E~~ ~~ ~ € 4 s a ? ' i ~ i1 E 4 ~ ' F~. r ~ ~ f ~ ' ~ ~ T i s~, ~e i ~ t i ~ . t „ ~ ~; je ~: i~ E; i ' ~ , 1 k i 1 ~ t - f 1: ~~~ t i'; x ~ 3 r~. S ~ ,; i ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ 1 ' 1 ri'+,L, I 4 ~ ~ ~ E., ~ i ~ f ~f~. k n ~ ~ . I ~ ~ ~i ~ ~~: ~p ~ i ~.~ i ~~1 F ry k ~~ I ~ I' ~ t r t.{ i ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ' i 1 . r +' I ~ ~ t i i ~ I ~ ~~ 1 ~ iiF :~' i, j ~ I ts, } a ~ ~ tt ;~ f k ;~. ~ ~ ' ~ i 5 ' ~ r 5t h f~ t `, C' ~ ~ ~ ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNI~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 Me~~N & STAII~IELI11, I~'C. 587~~'YU~S, 1ElV~J~11°~~~ FLr~Afi1V'~RS Pale 2 Thence S. 72° S~" S~" F,. ~ die c~f'~9.~5 feel to a point on ~e e;Ierl~ boundary of said SW11'~ 1~1~119'4;, Thence 1~«~ se~id slou,~h ~. 00° 3?' S2" W. ~ cs~ 111.66 ~ along stead e~sterl~ ~unda~ to the ~~ vainer of said S~ld~l N'Pld1lA, said c~-r~r momune~ted with ~. found SI'8-inch diameter imr~ l~h'-• '7 hence N. 89° 45° 23"' W, s of ~783~ t elon~, the snarly l~nndary of said S W 1 JA ~a`lf4 tv ~ 1PtJI1~TT 41~ ~~GIIV11fiI111i~. This }r~rcel conti~s 10.56 aca~es more car less. .4.tso, this garcel is subjeet to all er~tents and tights-~f-may of record or implied. Exhibit C ~I ' ~ I~: ~ ~ ';~ ~~' t ~ , f ~, ~ i t: ~ ' i hi ` j ~I '.. i t~ ~~ ~ ~'i ~ I ~ f s~. ~ ~ 6 ~ t I i i I ~ Y ~ ~ ~ f a E ,, i t '~ i I ; ii I { `` ~; I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ f~ i I . Si ~ P ~~ ~~ d t ' i E , " f t ;x i, Y ~ i 1 E F ' ' ~~ ( 3r L k' ~ ~ ~~ ~$ a ~ ~ i ~i ~ ~ ~ r ~ _~i ' l ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~~ ~ t . ~ I i ~ t~ r i ~ ~ k ( ~ ~ ~ f i ~ `~ ' ; ki z ~i ~ '~ r ~ I ~~ ~ i .~f € CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 ~~~ JbB h~ ~~ a pU- mil i-~ii M ~ Sti61E NT.S F ,]t V. .a a, x ~3reh rxua ~~ ., ~dD-iP' 61 A5. T~4 I A ~~ ~~ Fp I1 ~ - ~~F . ~ - -- _ Z.~. ~3;~2p __ n ~ ~ /2'4yk7' w I _ _ ~ . m: .. \G: Y~ . iW tl 45tt °. _ ~ • ~,' ~ A C i C 4~ X60 u+ TJi 45- /S D ~ ~ ~ C t _ ~ \ w ~~ rryr9aX ~~~u+ _ j7~- r ,M. .d .. .. ..~ _ .. _.. . 'j'A ~ ~ - Y°iNtV•1'si~b ~ .~ ',_.~ FS3fl" ' ~ ^ ~`~~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ _ ,-,-.,tom ~ ~~.®.,. ... T M p ~ ~ _ ~. ~ T:[5R 7~ [' 1t%' 15B f6 !]t~ !J~ G.9 i/j h ~ ` e a ___ _ ~ y _ ._ _ ,~ 1 1 - i~?~ 3Y m w5 as _ - ~ --D P 9 a ~. ~a +nr } u 7 i B a __ " ~ i i T ~-'- - i~-v~s .,, ~' - ' ~fi~a I~ ~ ~ r 1 tic fu 4,b~ 1 @@pp e4.. ~Fe Exhibit C Jb~I CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code 1. Annexation & Zoning Findings: Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone, the Council shall make the following findings: a. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The applicant is proposing to annex and zone the eastern 10.56 acre portion of the property R-40 and the western 1.5 acre portion of the property adjacent to Eagle Road, C- C. The City Council finds that the proposed zoning map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. ==°•°°-•°-, c~~~ a~33EtEafii.nr-~nf+t.° t c ,...~.;,,., .,. n n . - - - ~' "°"° r ~" "~~___~ ` '' (see Analysis, Section 10 of this report for more information). Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals, Section 8, of the Staff Report. b. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds that future development of the residential portion of this property will comply with the established regulations and purpose statement of the R-40 zone and future development of the C-C portion will comply with the purpose statement of the commercial districts. c. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds that the proposed zoning map amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. Staff recommends that the Commission and Council rely on any oral or written testimony that may be provided when determining this fording. d. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited to, school districts; and, The City Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment should not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. e. The annexation is in the best of interest of the City (LJDC 11-SB-3.E). The City Council finds that the annexation of the 10.56 acre portion of this property with an R-40 zoning designation and the 1.5 acre portion of this property with a C- C zoning designation is in the best interest of the City. pt°~ -'°°~ -°* r °~ ~~- 4 4>, ~ ~ zII.~~~ 4-.~... am ~L L r r ~ r r ~~' 2. Conditional Use Permit Findings: The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed conditional use in terms of the following, and may approve a conditional use permit if they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to Exhibit D CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNI~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 establish: a. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. The City Council finds that if the site is designed according to the conditions of approval in Exhibit B, the site will be large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet the dimensional and development regulations of the R-40 district and the multi-family Specific Use Standards. Note: The applicant is requesting a variance to the covered parking standards in UDC 11-3C-6. However, Staff believes that if a structure(s) is removed, the applicant will be able to comply with the required parking standards. b. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accord with the requirements of this Title. The City Council finds that the proposed multi-family residential use in the proposed R- 40 zone will be harmonious with and meet the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. c. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the e~sting or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. The City Council finds that the proposed multi-family development is compatible with other uses in the general area and will not adversely change the character of the area. d. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. The City Council finds that the proposed development should not adversely affect other properly in the vicinity if the applicant complies with all conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B of this staff report and constructs all improvements and operates the use in accordance with the UDC standards. e. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. The City Council fmds that sanitary sewer, domestic water and irrigation can be made available to the subject property. Please refer to comments prepared by the Public Works Department, Fire Department and other agencies. f. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. The City Council fmds that the applicant will pay to extend the sanitary sewer and water mains into the site. No additional capital facility costs are expected from the City. The applicant and/or future property owners will be required to pay highway impact fees. g. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Exhibit D CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 The City Council finds that the proposed development will not involve uses that will create nuisances that would be detrimental to the general welfare of the surrounding area. Staff recognizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase with the approval of this development; however, Staff does not believe that the amount generated will be detrimental to the general welfare of the public. h. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. - The City Council finds that the proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any natural feature(s) of major importance. Staff recommends that the Commission and Council reference any public testimony that may be presented to determine whether or not the proposed development may destroy or damage a natural or scenic feature(s) of major importance of which staff is unaware. in~e -~r ie~; ~„"~~' ~+ t~a~l~i n~ thA rr~uwcE~ to ~ ~ , z > > ~ ~ ~ ~ } ~ ' tza a ' SS BElllitr 4'IIG~~ S a$FE S- TSl• ~ +• & - g e~ -S~ e + ~S~ . r ~ lesa~e ~ R ~-a~ ~o ~- a geese- ee t~ tea . ter' 1Tlf=,~'P.~ E~C~n o c~ni ~ ~t, 1'1 1'1. u f+.-.,+~,... «l-1:.. ages ea- a ...,..] ..t_ ~ _~ _ -- r_ t~ g-thc e~ ,-i~ -fae~~ ~e~ al~e-~e~atiti F, -h ~+~~ e~ ~ '., y 4. Variance (VAR-08-002) Findings: a. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district; The City Council is supportive of the request for a variance for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required by UDC 11-3C-6 from 360 to 295. Further, City Council fords that granting a variance as requested would not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district for multi-family uses. Exhibit D CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNI~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 b. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; Staff believes there are no .topographical limitations or other physical characteristics of this lot which would prevent full compliance with UDC 11-6C-3B.4. c. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. The City Council fords that granting the variance should not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 5. Private Street Findings: a. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this Article• The applicant shall comply with the private street design standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4A and condition of approval #12 3 listed above in Ezhibit B of this staff report. b. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage hazard, or ntusance, or other detriment to persons property or uses in the vicinity and If the Applicant complies with the conditions listed in Ezhibit B of this staff report pertainine to private streets, Staff does not anticipate any hazard, nuisance or other detriment from the private streets if they are designed and constructed as required h UDC 11-3F-4. c. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and/or the regional transportation plan Staff finds that the use and location of the proposed private streets do not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and/or the regional transportation plan Exhibit D ~ .~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~ ~ ~ f , ~ r; ~ { ~ k f 4 f . ~~ :i S ~ ? s ,I ~ ~, ~~~ x ~ c~. !:. ll x a ~ ~i ~ ~J,I F ~ ~ ~ r ff ? i i tl I ` ~ ~ ~ f I ~~ ~ ~ i ~ i ( ~ ~ i ~ ` F ~ ~ ~. . ` ij ~ j 3.. i ~ ~ ~ >; { ~ ~+: ~ f i i ~~ ~d ~ ~! 's C ~ t t r t E 'F t phi: i' t' ~ ~t t~ ' ~~~ ~ , irti e ~i ~ ` k ~ ::~ f. ~ j ~ y ~ E 7 ~~ - ~ • +6 ~~a ~` c F i ~E~ ~ ~" ~ € ~"' ~ ~1 2 ' Y f ~, ~~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ 1 y { ~ 1 June 13, 2008 VA R 0$-002 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Mason & Stanfield ITEM NO. 5-D REQUEST Findings for Approval -Request for a Variance to UDC for a reduction in number of parking spaces required for multi dwellings in covered carports or garages for Regency at Rlver Valley - 2500 N. Eagle Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See aftached Findings CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: ~a ~ CITY BUILDING DEPT: ~/ ~ CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: i ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: r Date: lQ- I Phone: Emailed: ~~, Initials: Materials presented at public meeflngs shall become properly of the City of Meridian. t i z ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ jjj ~ ~ F ~ ~ { x t ~ f ~ t t ~ ~ . ~ a e (s '% ~ ~~~- ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ { F~. r ~i~~~ .a 1 ~ ..~ ~ t ,.~ )k 1 ~ ~. ' i ~ i l ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ vi S ' S ~ r ~; ~ 7 ~ 'i j ~ ~ ~ ~ ? 1- j ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~ ~, +s ~ ~ ~ 3 ; ~ . ; ~ ` , , t ~ ~ :~ ~ r I ~ ~ rd ~~ `s ~ ~ .: t ? j l E +~ ~ €f ~s ~ ~~ ~~ t ~ ~ i jt~ a- t f r, is ` 4 ~~ P ,P Y I f 1 ~ t ,i ME ~ E} it ~ 1 z 1 7E t , ~ ' ... ~ ~ . y ~ r ~ ' { i s ~ F i, ~ x , ~ ~, k e ~ i~` ; ~ , ~ i ~~~ ~ ~ j~f$ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~: 3. f r ~ • CITY OF MERIDIAN (~E IDIAN~-- FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND I o A M o DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of Annexation and Zoning of 12.06 acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) and C-C (Community Business) (1.5 acres) zoning districts; Conditional Use Permit for amulti-family residential development in a proposed R-40 zoning district; and Variance to UDC Table 11-3C-6 for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required for multi-family dwellings, by Mason & Stanfield, Inc. Case No(s). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 For the City Council Hearing Dates of: Apri122, May 20, and May 27, 2008 (Findings on the June 17, 2008 City Council agenda) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-SA. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 -I- f i h ~ ya tX 3 i i ~ ~q~ ~ ~ K S y Y 1 }~. F i 77 i ft, j i 1: ~:. ~ ~t G I S § ~ ~ t5. f E~ . ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ I ~;~ ~ f~ F . ; ~ , ~ ~ ~I t I. ~ `~ , fi S F ~ , ~~ i '~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ' , ~ ~ ' ~ ' s ~ ~ `; i ~ ' ~ ~_ ~ ~ j ; rte. ~~ ~~ ~; ~ ~ E ~{, 2 ~( i ~i I ~ f' ~ I 1 ' E i ~ '~ ~ . ~Y f ~ ~ Vii. ~ ~~ ~, ~~. ~~ "7 r c~ ~i ~ ,~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ b f~; ~' ~ y ~ j~i ~ ' ;3 f r ~' ~ [ ~~ ~ ~ i - f ~ ~ ~ ~ i G ~ ~ ' ~ ~ s ' ~~ ~ ~5 s 7 , ~, f ~ 1 ~~ ~ ,~ , SF~ _t _ 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Legal Description, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Building Elevations, Development Agreement, and the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-SA and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The Applicant's Annexation and Zoning request, as evidenced by having submitted the legal description and exhibit map, stamped and dated June 14, 2006, by Darin Holzhey, PLS, included in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008 incorporated by reference, is hereby conditionally approved. 2. A Development Agreement is required with approval of the subject Annexation & Zoning application and shall include the provisions noted in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008 incorporated by reference. 3. The Applicant's Conditional Use Permit request as evidenced by having submitted the Site Plan (dated 3/12/08), Landscape Plan (dated 1/08), and Building Elevations included in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, is hereby conditionally approved. 4. The Applicant's Variance request for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required for multi-family developments is hereby approved. 5. The site specific and standard conditions of approval are as shown in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Eighteen (18) Month Conditional Use Permit Duration CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 -2- Please take notice that the conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of eighteen (18) months unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time, the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting, the final plat must be recorded within this eighteen (18) month period. For projects with multiple phases, the eighteen (18) month deadline shall apply to the first phase. In the event that the development is made in successive contiguous segments or multiple phases, such phases shall be constructed within successive intervals of one (1) year from the original date of approval. If the successive phases are not submitted within the one (1) year interval, the conditional approval of the future phases shall be null and void. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-SB-6.G.1, the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1) eighteen (18) month period. Additional time extensions up to eighteen (18) months as determined and approved by the Commission maybe granted. With all extensions, the Director or Commission may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, a denial of a plat or conditional use permit entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review maybe filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which maybe adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the conditional use permit approval may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 -3- '%~ V '~~Y :6 ,I i ~ ~i ~ 1 n t~ } 7' F3~1 ,i By action of the City Council at its re lar meetin held on t gu g he day of _ r~--l~.nSL , 2008. COUNCIL MEMBER DAVID ZAREMBA VOTED (,~GL COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED l"I~l,~ U COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE VOTED~p~ COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD VOTED MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED `~ (TIE BREAKER) Mayor T Weerd ~`~~~ruurrurr,r,~~ Attest: ```~~•`~~y ~ /~~~''•~/'''. ~r~ ~ ~. o ; Jaycee H an, City Clerl~ ~ - i ~ ~' Copy served upon Applicant, 1~e~ent, Public Works Department and City ',,r~rrrrHrH rr rN~N~`, Attorney. B Dated: ~ - 2?J-(~~ ity Clerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ-08-003; CUP-08-004; VAR-08-002 -4- CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~pARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA)~i DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 STAFF REPORT Hearing Date: May 20, 2008 (Continued from April 22, 2008) TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Sonya Wafters, Associate City Planner (208) 884-5533 SUBJECT: Regency at River Valley (Revised) • AZ-08-003 E IDIAN-- ~~~~~ Annexation and Zoning of 12.06 acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) and C-C (Community Business) (1.5 acres) zoning districts • CUP-08-004 Conditional Use Permit for amulti-family residential development in a proposed R-40 zoning district Vaxi~nc-a tra TTf1r i i 1LT AD ~;,.t~ ~..,.~.:w:.,. _----- ------ - z4 .4 C~TT CG /T / O- J ~ R R~ ~~'-~a`v'c*r v~ar)rD ossa-xo co~sauckct~ Withdrawn • VAR-08-002 Variance to UDC Table 11-3C-6 for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required for multi-family dwellings • PS-OS-004 Request for approval of private streets within the proposed development The Commission heard these applications at the public hearing on March 6, 2008 At the meeting on March 6"' the apphcant deculed to withdraw the Variance (VAR 08 OOl request for a temporary access to SH 55/Eagle Road. At that meeting the Commission voted to continue the project until the March 20"` meetzng so staff could update the conditions of approval (Staff had originally included draft condztzons of approval because Staff was recommending several significant changes to the site plan); so the szte elan could be revised by the applicant• and so comments/conditions could be obtatned om ACHD. On March 6`h the maker of the motion for continuance stated that they would like to see the following changes made to the site elan • l) Add an emergency access only driveway to Allys N'ay: 2) Provide a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway on the site in accordance with Parks Department comments• and 3) Remove the temporary access to Eagle Road The maker of the motion also stated that their recommendation for approval would be prefaced on the applicant and NMID reaching an agreement pertatnzng to the relocation of the Downey Sublateral The Commission supported the Variance (VAR-08-002) request for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required. The applicant has submr#ed a revised site plan which staff has reviewed and made modifications to the staff report accordingly Changes to the staff report since the March 6"' version are in bold italics and underline ~~'"°""' sz'°`" °° °"°`" -' `'"--" --- ' " Comments have been received from ACHD and are included in Exhzbzt B of this report. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 1. SUIVIlVIARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST The Applicant, Mason & Stanfield, Inc., has applied for Annexation and Zoning (AZ) of 12.06 acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) and C-C (Community Business) (1.5 acres). Concurrently, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is requested for amulti-family residential development on 10.56 acres in a proposed R-40 zoning district. ~e A variances (VAR) to the Unified Development Code,&fe is also requested as follows: 1) V~eeze~lC--1} ~L. ~hiah nr~hih'+ ~ + + + + t ' L vayS~9-all9ia~te~6 ~ ~.~, ~A~~x~kia~.nah t;mrL~ D' s> » n a • +-- + a a ~~ Variance to UDC Table 11-3C-6 for a reduction in the number of parking spaces required for multi-family dwellings in covered carports or garages The applicant is proposing 204 multi-family living units within 9 apartment buildings, a clubhouse, swimming pool area, a putting green, several gazebos, an entry water feature, pathways, extensive landscaping, and a playground area. The site is located at 2500 N. Eagle Road, approximately 1/z mile north of the Fairview/Eagle intersection on the east side of Eagle Road. The subject property is currently located within the Urban Service Planning Area. 2. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION The subject applications (AZ, CUP, & VAR'-s) were submitted to the Planning Department for concurrent review. By city code, the Planning & Zoning Commission is not requited to hold a hearing on or act on the ~tue variance applications. However, because the variance requests-ate is integral to the project, staff recommends that the Commission, as part of their action, state a preference on the t~ve variance requests. Below, staff has provided a detailed analysis of the proposed applications. Staff is recommending approval of the subject AZ, CUP and PS applications per the conditions of approval in Exhibit B and the Development Agreement prov~ons m Section 10. Staff is recommending denial of the VAR application per the analysis m Section 10 and the findings in Exhibit D ~*~*~ ~~ a• ,,;_,~,~t ~~~ ..a i.e,. + w .. .. ~ ~ z r ~ ., J` ~ r r --- --- S:9a-9~1~'t~ch gam' „~:> >..~,, a...... ~- - °- - - a .+' ., _ CUP request. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing• i. In favor: Lars Anderson, Bach Homes• Scott Stanfiel Mason Stanfield Engineering ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Andrew Wilk iv. Written testimony: David Kleiner• Andrew Wilk v. Staff presenting application: Caleb Hood• Sonya Wafters vi. Other staff commenting on application• None b. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission• i. The addition of an emergency access driveway to the site from Allys Way ii. Support of the request for annexation of 15 acres with a C-C zoning designation if the Variance request for a temporary access to Eagle Road is withdrawn• iii. Removal of one of the multi-family structures in order to provide covered parking as required by the UDC for multi-family developments• Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 iv. The request for a variance for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces reawred• v. The encroachment of structures and landscaping within the easement for the Stokesberrv/Downev Lateral along the south boundary and the proposed relocation of the lateral and easement further to the south. vi. Allowance of a 5-foot wide multi-use pathway through the site within a public use easement and signage identifying it as a public pathway if a 10 foot wide pathway is constructed along Allys Wav and E River Valley Road, as approved by the Parks Department. c. Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation. i. Required an emergency access only driveway to Allys Wav ii. Required amulti-use pathway on the site in accordance with Parks Department comments. iii. Removed the temporary access request (Variance) to Eagle Road• and iv. Recommendation of approval is based on the applicant and N1VIID reaching an a~'eement pertaining to the relocation of the Downey Sublateral d. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council. i. The Commission was supportive of the requested variance for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required. staff is not supportive If the parking variance is not granted a new site plan should be submitted. ii. Comments from ACRD have been received and are included in Ezhibit B of this report. iii. The applicant has submitted a private street application as required by Condition of Approval #1.2.3 (see Ezhibit B). Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE3 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANN)~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 ~_ eV COUnCII Ch:1T~PC to ~ta~ff/r'nmmiccinn i2n i. Additional provision to be added to the Development Agreement: The Citv will not approve the ordinance for annexation of the requested parcel until one of three contingencies occurs• a) The Kleiner Nnrth ParrPl ns ;~ ~ ~RIIed and the a vexation or inane i bl The ROW fnr River Valley Street is rlPrliratnri to A!''_ _ _ with acrpcc to Faulp Road• C) The ROW fnr Allevc Way/Rarnrdc un'.1;~ dea'ca~ea ~•• "^n^ Wl h aCrpcc to Fa rv~ew Av n ~ . or Nck Road. This wo ~Id a low mporarv ~sP of the eastern enev access until cLrh tim as fiver Vall v 4trpP+ i~ rnnc+r.. n+p,a Note: The City does not guarantee that any of Chaco rnNd~tinH~ ~,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,. ....w, within the one-year time frame of the DA annrovaL These conditions may be odified through the DA modification process 3. PROPOSED MOTION Partial ApprovaUPartial Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Numbers AZ-08- 003, CUP-08-004, and PS-08-004 '~"'~ *'~° -°--••° + ~ °~-+~°~ B ~ t n cc T AA K , ^~ nQ nn~ VAD no nn~ a ' ~~ and deny File Number VAR-08-002, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008 with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Approval After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve File Numbers AZ-08- 003, CUP-08-004, ~' ^ VAR-08-002, and PS-08-004 as presented during the hearing, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) (You should state specific reasons for approval of the variance.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Numbers AZ-08-003, CUP-08-004, ~' ^ DST VAR-08-002, and PS-08-004 as presented during the hearing, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial of the annexation, conditional use permit, and variance, and what the applicant could do to gain your approval in the future.) Continuance I move to continue File Numbers AZ-08-003, CUP-08-004, ~' "~~~ , VAR-08-002, and PS- 08-004 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) 4. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACT5 a. Site Address/Location: 2500 N. Eagle Road (Parcel #S1104233914 & #S1104233920) NW '/a of Section 4, T.3N., R.1 E. b. Owners: RAMI, LLC; MBJR, LLC; Eagle Mesa, LLC; Eagle Coulter, LLC; JACOM, LC Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE4 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLASPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 c. Applicant: Mason & Stanfield, Inc. 314 Badiola Street Caldwell, Idaho 83605 d. Representative: Lars Anderson, Bach Homes e. Present Zoning: RUT (Ada County) f. Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Mixed Use -Regional g. Description of Applicant's Request: From the applicant's narrative: "We are requesting annexation of two zones and an accompanying CUP. The annexation request includes 1.5 acres (for C-C zone) for the westerly portion adjacent to Eagle Road and 10.91 acres for an R-40 zone. The request complies with the current Comprehensive Plan. The project will comply with the UDC with the exception of covered parking ~ ~ o .. +~ ~T ~----~ _ n _ _ ~ „ ""Y" (See Applicant's letter for more detail.) 1. Date of Site Plan (attached in Exhibit A): "~~~~~ ' ~, '~~^~ 3/12/08 (stamped by R. Scott Stanfield, P.E., and Darin Holzhey, P.L.S., ~-~~) 2. Date of Landscape Plan (attached in Exhibit A): ~~~~~• ~~, ~~~~ 1/08 (prepared by Lars Anderson, Bach Homes) 5. PROCESS FACTS a. The subject application will in fact constitute an Annexation & Zoning as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of UDC 11-SA-2, a public hearing is required before the Commission and City Council on this matter. b. The subject application will in fact constitute a Conditional Use Permit as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of UDC 11-SA-2, a public hearing is required before the Com~iiission and City Council on this matter. c. The subject applications will in fact constitute a Variance as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of UDC 11-SA-2, a public hearing is required before the City Council on this matter. d. Newspaper notifications published on: February 18, 2008 and March 3, 2008 (Commission); March 31, and AAril 14 2008 (Gifu Council) e. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: February 12, 2008 (Commission); March 28, 2008 (Gifu Councill f. Applicant posted notice on site by: February 22, 2008 (Commission); April 9, 2008 (Gifu Council 6. LAND USE a. Existing Land Use(s): This property is currently vacant with some existing outbuildings associated with a former residence. b. Description of Character of Surrounding Area: This area contains a mix ofsingle-family residential properties, commercially zoned vacant land, and office uses. c. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 5 ~' ~ I f ,y; ~ ~. a~ ~ ii '~ ~ j : ~ j, E ~ I ~~' ~ , s # ~ f f ~ } / ~ ~ ~ i E x ~, ~ ~ ~' i 1 € ~ ! it ~ i ! i ~ , ~ ' f ~ ~~~ f t ~ t~t~ ~ ~~ x ~ ~ t E~ ~ ,, E £ 2w i ~ + t7 7 ~ i ~; i ,~ ~ ~: t~ ~, j p j ,~ ~~~ ~ F ~. ~ ~ yf i~ ~~~ ~~ iL 9{ ~. i ~~ i ~ ~9' r ~~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANN>~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 1. North: Vacant commercial property, zoned C-G 2. East: Vacant commercial property, zoned C-G and single-family residences in Redfeather Estates subdivision, zoned R-4 3. South: Vacant property (in the process of being zoned C-G -Meridian Town Center), zoned RUT (Ada County) 4. West: Single-family residence and vacant property, zoned RUT (Ada County); office uses (on the west side of Eagle Road), zoned L-O; and vacant property, zoned C-G d. History of Previous Actions: The following applications were submitted for this property in 2006 and all were denied by the City Council: • Annexation and Zoning (AZ-06-035) of 12.06 acres to C-C (Community Business District) (1.50 acres) and R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) • Conditional Use Permit (CUP-06-022) for amulti-family development consisting of 204 multi-family residential units • Private Street (PS-06-006) request adjacent to the proposed multi-family units • Variance (VAR-06-014) request to UDC 11-3C-6A to provide less than the required number of covered parking stalls for multi-family dwellings • Variance (VAR-06-015) request to UDC 11-4.3.27B3 to provide less than 80 square feet of private, usable open space for each multi-family dwelling unit • Variance (VAR-06-016) request to UDC 11-3h-4B2 to construct a vehicular access to a state highway at a location other than a section line road or the half mile mark between sections e. Existing Constraints and Opportunities: 1. Public Works: Location of sewer: This property is proposing to connect to sewer mains located in Eagle Road. Location of water: This property is proposing to connect to water service mains located in Eagle Road. Issues or concerns: None 2. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: The South Slough runs along the northern boundary of this site. The Downey Sublateral runs along the south boundary of the site. 3. Existing trees: There are existing trees on the site that are proposed to be removed. The applicant shall comply with the mitigation requirements listed in UDC 11-3B-lOC. 4. Floodplain: This property does not lie within the floodplain or floodway. 5. Hazards: The South Slough is located along the northern boundary of this site and may create a water hazard for small children as it will remain uncovered. 6. Proposed Zoning: R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) & C-C (Community Business) (1.5 acres) 7. Size of Property: 12.06 acres f. Landscaping Regency at River Valley (revised) ~ ~ ' ~~ a ~ ~~ ~ i ' i L~ ~ '~ - ~j~ i l~ E ! i. ~` : ~ ! ii PAGE 6 7, i 5 k+, i z i~ '~ I? ~~i { ~u: ~~; l { t i I t CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 1. Width of street buffer(s): A 35-foot wide buffer is required along Eagle Road/SH 55, an arterial street; a 20-foot wide buffer is required along Allys Way, a collector street, and a 20- foot wide buffer will be required along the future E. River Valley Road, a collector street. Street buffer landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. Z. Width of buffer(s) between land uses: A 25-foot wide buffer is required in commercial districts adjacent to any existing residential uses. There is currently an existing residence (parcel #1104234102) located at the south boundary of the portion of the property proposed to be zoned commercially. If the residential use of this property exists at the time of development (i.e. CZC submittal), a 25-foot wide buffer shall be provided along that boundary. Buffers to adjoining land uses shall be installed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. 3. Percentage of site as open space: 18% or 1.91 acres of useable open space 4. Other landscaping standards: Parking lot landscaping shall be installed per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. g. Amenities: Per UDC 11-4-3-27D.2, 4+ amenities are required for this development with at least one from each category (i.e. quality of life, open space, recreation). The following amenities are proposed: walking trails, clubhouse, water feature, swimming pool, a putting green, several gazebos, and a tot lot. The applicant has complied with this requirement. h. Off-Street Parking: UDC 11-3C-6 requires multi-family dwellings with 1 bedroom to have 2 parking spaces per unit, 1 in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 481-bedroom units, which requires 48 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces. Multi-family dwellings with more than 1 bedroom are required to have 2 parking spaces per unit in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 156 units with more than 1 bedroom, which requires 312 covered spaces. A total of 360 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces are required on the site for a total of 408 spaces. The applicant has provided X299 covered spaces and ~ I09 uncovered spaces for a total of 408 spaces. A variance is requested for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required. i. Required Dimensional Standards for Multi-family Residential Use in the R-40 Zone, per UDC 11-4-3-27B and 11-2A-8: 1. Minimum Building Setback: A minimum 20-foot wide setback is required along the south and east property boundaries adjacent to E. River Valley Road and Allys Way because of the required 20-foot wide street buffers (per UDC Table 11-2A-8) and a minimum 10-foot wide setback is required along the north and west property boundaries (per UDC 11-4-3-27B). 2. Maximum Building Height: 60 feet j. Summary of Proposed Streets and/or Access: Access to the site is proposed from two access points to/from the future extension of E. River Valley Road. i~-l~ :~~a[~t~irra~}~sk, kha ,irrana,+~ ~ ~ w a n r • ~ ,. a c•, rr ~S~ppE-rti~rr~~f th i-~ r a + r * ~ ' n a The applicant is proposing to construct ~S'-a~ 26' drive aisles within the multi-family development; Staff is requesting that the applicant submit a private street application and that minimum 26-foot wide private streets are provided. The applicant is proposing to construct a segment of Allys Way on the east boundary of the site in alignment with the existing Allys Way north of the site, on the north side of Ustick Road; Staff is supportive of Allys Way being constructed. An emer~ency only access to Allys Way to the east is $et proposed; Staff is supportive of this access. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 7 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNI~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~i DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 Further, as of the print date of this report, comments have not been received from ACHD. However, Staff spoke with Matt Edmonds at ACRD and he stated that the applicant will be required to construct half the street section of E. River Valley Road abutting the site consisting of 24 feet of pavement and a 7-foot wide sidewalk (as proposed by the applicant). The applicant is proposing to dedicate and construct the whole right-of--way for Allys Way on the eastern portion of the site. Matt did not think that an emergency access point to Allys (as required by City Staff) to/from the site would be a problem. Further, ACHD is requiring a road trust deposit for half of the construction cost of the bridge over the South Slough. Please see Section 10, Analysis, and Exhibit B of this report for more information. 7. COMMENTS MEETING On February 15, 2008 a joint agency and department meeting was held with service providers in this area. The agencies and departments present include: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian Parks Department, Meridian Public Works Department, Meridian Police Department, and the Sanitary Services Company. Staff has included comments, conditions and recommended actions in Exhibit B below. 8. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS This property is designated "Mixed Use -Regional" on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. In Chapter VII of the Comprehensive Plan, this designation is defined in part as an area that is situated in highly visible or transitioning parts of the City where innovative and flexible design opportunities are encouraged. The MU-R designation allows for over 200,000 square feet of non- residential uses, residential densities ranging from 3 to 40-dwelling units per acre, mixed use neighborhood and mixed use commercial uses, as well as regional commercial uses such as entertainment and employment centers and clean industry. Staff believes that the requested C-C and R-40 zoning of the property with 17.86 dwelling units per acre planned for the multi-family portion of the development, complies with the MU-R designation for this property (please see Analysis, Section 10 below for more information). Staff fords the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to the proposed development (staff analysis in italics below policy): • Chapter VII, Goal III, Objective A, Action 1 -Require that development projects have planned for the provision of all public services. When the City established its Area of City Impact, it planned to provide City services to the subject property. The City of Meridian plans to provide municipal services to the subject property in the following manner - Sanitary sewer and water service will be extended to the project at the developer's expense. - The subject lands currently lie within the jurisdiction of the Meridian Rural Fire District. Once annexed the lands will be under the jurisdiction of the Meridian City Fire Department, who currently shares resource and personnel with the Meridian Rural Fire Department. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 8 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIZ~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 - The subject lands currently lie within the jurisdiction of the Ada County Sheriff's Office. Once annexed, the lands will be serviced by the Meridian Police Department (MPD). - The roadways adjacent to the subject lands are currently owned and maintained by the Ada County Highway District (ACFID). This service will not change. - The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian School District No. 2. This service will not change. - The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian Library District. This service will not change and the Meridian Library District should suffer no revenue loss as a result of the subject annexation. Municipal, fee-supported, services will be provided by the Meridian Building Department, the Meridian Public Works Department, the Meridian Water Department, the Meridian Wastewater Department, the Meridian Planning Department, Meridian Utility Billing Services, and Sanitary Services Company. Chapter V, Goal I, Objective A, Action 4 -Develop and maintain greenbelts along waterways. The applicant is proposing to construct a section of multi-use pathway on the site that will connect to the future master pathway planned along the north side of the South Slough via a pedestrian bridge at the northwest comer of the site. • Chapter V, Goal I, Objective A, Action 11 -Improve and protect creeks (Five Mile, Eight Mile, South Slough ...etc.) throughout commercial, industrial, and residential areas. The South Slough, which runs along the northern boundary of this site, should be improved and protected during development of the site. Chapter V, Goal I, Objective A.1 -Preserve and conserve our waterways, wetlands, wildlife habitat, and other natural resources. The South Slough, a natural waterway, runs along the northern boundary of this site. As a natural waterway, it will remain open and should be preserved. • Chapter VII, Goal I, Objective D, Action 9 -Require new residential development to provide permanent perimeter fencing to contain construction debris on site and prevent windblown debris from entering adjacent agricultural and other properties. The applicant is proposing to construct a 6 foot tall chain link fence along the north property boundary adjacent to the South Slough in accordance with UDC 11-3A-6B3. Six foot tall vinyl fencing is proposed along the west property boundary. Temporary construction fencing shall be constructed prior to release of building permits in all areas where permanent fencing is not proposed, to contain debris during construction. • Chapter V, Goal III, Objective D, Action 3 -Require all new parking lots to provide landscaping in internal islands. Landscaping is shown on the landscape plan within the parking areas in planter islands for the residential portion of the development. All parking lot landscaping shall be installed per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 1 -Protect existing. residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels. The applicant is proposing a residential zone adjacent to Redfeather Subdivision, a residential subdivision, at the east boundary of the site and the existing residence at the Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 9 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~i DATE OF MAY Z0, 2008 southwest corner of the site. The extension of Allys Way also separates this site from Redfeather Subdivision. If the property adjacent to Eagle Road is zoned commercially as proposed, a 25 foot wide landscape buffer is required to be constructed adjacent to residential uses. Staff finds that the proposed residential development should be compatible with the existing residential properties in the area. • Chapter VII, Goal I, Objective C, Action 4 -Require new residential development to meet development standazds regazding landscaping, signage, fences, and walls, etc. The Applicant will be required to construct a 20 foot wide landscape buffer along E. River Palley Road that complies with UDC 11-38-7, Landscape Buffers along Streets. All signage proposed for the site must be approved through a sign permit and shall comply with UDC 11- 3D-10, Table 2. Fencing proposed on the site shall comply with UDC 11-3A-7. • Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 10 - Support a variety of residential categories (low-, medium-, and high-density single-family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. Staff believes that the proposed high-density multi family residential development will assist in providing a variety of residential housing opportunities in the City. 9. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE a. Schedule of Uses: Unified Development Code (iJDC) 11-2A-21ists multi-family developments as a conditional use in the R-40 zoning district. Specific Use Standazds (iJDC 11-4-3-27) apply to multi-family developments; please see Section 10, Analysis below for more information. UDC Table 11-2B-21ists several uses that are principal permitted uses, conditional uses, and prohibited uses in the proposed C-C zoning district. Among the principal permitted uses aze animal care facilities; indoor/outdoor arts, entertainment or recreation facilities; building material, gazden equipment and supplies; churches, group daycazes, education institutions, financial institutions, flex space, fuel sales facility, healthcare or social services, information industry, Laundromat, mortuary, nursery or urban farm, pazks, personal or professional service, public/quasi-public use, restaurant, retail store, minor vehicle repair, vehicle washing facility, vertical integrated residential project, etc. b. Purpose Statement of the Proposed Districts: Residential Districts: Per UDC 11-2A-1, the purpose of the residential districts is to provide for a range of housing opportunities consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Connection to the City of Meridian water and sewer systems is a requirement for all residential districts. Residential districts are distinguished by the allowable density of dwelling units per acre and corresponding housing types that can be accommodated within the density range. Commercial Districts: Per UDC 11-2B-1, the purpose of the commercial districts is to provide for the retail and service needs of the community in accord with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Four districts aze designated which differ in the size and scale of commercial structures accommodated in the district, the scale and mix of allowed commercial uses, and the location of the district in proximity to streets and highways. 10. ANALYSIS a. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation: Fwuc imm~A cv ~~' ~+ r ~ ~ Y Ir-0.. ,.~.,..' ~ ' a H~ldi..~ ~9E&~ie~vcaii is nlcn rn^., ...~• +1. + Fi, r_E oa °~ e~a~ ..::.5 ..-cu.~-c Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 10 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 , ~~ 1. Annexation & Zoning (AZ): Based on the policies and goals contained in the Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map designation of Mixed Use -Regional, Staff believes that the requested R-40 and C-C zoning districts are appropriate for this property. r fallewease~r: Staff believes that access to the portion of the property proposed to be zoned C-C and all of the properties fronting Eagle Road/SH 55, south of the South Slough, should be provided from the south via a backage road that connects to the future E. River Valley Road and that across-access/ingress-egress easement should be provided to the properties to the north and south from the subiect uroperty.;-and-mat Until the residential property to the south re-develops, the proposed commercial portion of the property will not be able to access E. River Valley Road, and should not use Eagle Road as access. •. a+.,~ i.a;,..,,.~ ~~..,~ ..n ~ „f ~w,.., ..,.,.~:,.~ ~..,,.F:.... ~....ie .Staff is recommending approval of the annexation and zoning of 1.5 acres to C-C (see legal description & exhibit map for C-C zone in Exhibit C.3). Staff is ~;:~r; supportive of the requested R-40 zoning designation for the eastern portion of the property proposed for multi-family residential use for the following reasons: The Comprehensive Plan future land use designation for this property of MiT- R allows for residential densities of 3 to 40 units per acre. The applicant is proposing 204 residential units within a proposed R-40 zoning district, which allows for the property to develop within the desired densities stated in the Comprehensive Plan for this area. Further, Staff believes that amulti-family development would be appropriate and would contribute to the variety of uses in this area. For these reasons, Staff is recommending of approval of the annexation and zoning of 10.56 acres to R-40 (see legal description & exhibit map for R 40 zone in Exhibit C.2). Please see Exhibit D for a detailed analysis of the required facts and findings for an annexation & zoning request. The legal description submitted with the application (stamped on June 14, 2006 by Darin Holzhey, PLS) is accurate and meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and Idaho State Tax Commission. UDC 11-SB-3D2 provides the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council the authority to require a property owner to enter into a Development Agreement (DA) with the City of Meridian that may require some written commitment for all future uses. Because of the nature of the development and the high density zoning district proposed by the applicant, Staff believes that a DA is necessary to ensure that the site develops in a manor that is consistent with said plans. Staff has included a list of recommended DA provision below. If the Commission or Council feels additional development agreement Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 11 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANN)PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL; DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 provisions are necessary, staff recommends a clear outline of the commitments of the developer being required. Development Agreement: A Development Agreement (DA) will be required as part of annexation of this property. Prior to annexation approval, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the properly owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. The applicant shall contact the City Attorney, Bill Nary, at 888-4433, within 6 ~ of City Council approval to initiate this process. The DA shall include, at minimum, the following: a. A maximum of 204 multi-family residential units shall be allowed to be constructed on the site. b. A minimum 5,868 square foot clubhouse shall be constructed on the site, as proposed. c. At a minimum, amenities shall be constructed on the site as proposed on the site plan (i.e. clubhouse, water feature, swimming pool, walking trails, tot lot, gazebos, etc.). d. All multi-family structures shall comply with the architectural standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27E. Structures shall be constructed on the site in accordance with the elevations attached in Exhibit A. e. The site/structures shall comply with the Specific Use Standards listed in UDC 11-4- 3-27 for multi-family developments. f. The applicant shall comply with the parking standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6 for multi-family developments as follows: for 1 bedroom units, there shall be two parking spaces with at least one in a covered carport or garage; and for units with more than one bedroom, 2 parking spaces shall be provided, both in a covered carport or garage. No variance to this standard is granted. g. A legally binding document shall be recorded that states the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including, but not limited to, structures, parking, common areas, and other development features, per UDC 11-4-3-27G. h. Access to this site shall be provided from E. River Valley Road and an emergency only access shall be urovided from Allys Way. Access to Eagle Road is prohibited. i. The applicant shall dedicate right-of--way and construct Allys Way in accordance with ACHD standards, in alignment with Allys Way north of the site, on the north side of Ustick Road, prior to release of occupancy of any structure on this site. j. The applicant shall construct (or have available) at least half the street section of E. River Valley Road (24 feet of pavement and 7-foot wide sidewalk) in accordance with ACHD standards, prior to release of occupancy of any structure on this site. k. All existing buildings on the site shall be removed prior to release of building permits for this development. 1. Twenty-six foot wide private streets shall be provided within the site in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. m. A 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along the future extension of E. River Valley Road, per UDC Table 11-2A-8. Landscaping shall be provided in said buffer in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C, Landscape Buffers along Streets. If NMID will not allow landscaping (i. e. trees) within their easement for the Downey Sublateral and if there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the street buffer, the applicant shall provide an additional 5 foot wide strip for landscaping outside of the NMID easement, per UDC 11-3B-7CIb. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 12 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 n. The Downey Sublateral easement along the southern boundary of the site shall either be relocated so that structures do not encroach within the easement OR the structures shall be relocated outside of the easement, prior to submittal of the first Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the pazking and common areas. o. A 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along Allys Way, per UDC Table 11- 2A-8. Landscaping shall be provided in said buffer in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C, Landscape Buffers along Streets. p. Landscaping shall be provided on the site in accordance with the specific use standards for multi-family developments listed in UDC 11-4-3-27F. q. The applicant shall construct 6-foot tall vinyl fencing along the west property boundary and 6-foot tall chain link fencing along the north side of the property adjacent to the South Slough as depicted on the landscape plan. Temporary construction fencing is required to be installed where permanent fencing is not proposed, azound the residential portion of the site prior to issuance of building permits to contain debris during construction. Fencing shall be constructed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. r. A minimum 5-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer is required adjacent to parking and vehicular use azeas along the north boundary of the site and adjacent to the existing residence on the west boundary of the site, per UDC 11-3B-8C. Said buffer is required to be planted with one tree per 35 lineaz feet and shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative ground cover. If 1VMID will not allow trees within their easement for the South Slough, the applicant may apply for Alternative Compliance in accordance with UDC 11-SB-S. s. A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway and bridge over the South Slough shall be constructed on the site in accordance with the Parks Department conditions contained in Exhibit B and the standazds in the Master Pathways Plan and UDC 11- 3A-8. t. With the first CZC application, include mitigation details for the 9 existing trees on the site, consisting of 120 caliper inches, proposed to be removed, in compliance with UDC 11-3B-10. Contact Elroy Huff, City Arborist, 888-3579 for more details. u. The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) for approval of all of the pazking and common azeas on the site prior to submittal of CZC's for structures. v. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance is required prior to issuance of a building permit for any and all of the proposed multi-family structures within this development. All structures must substantially comply with the building elevations submitted with this application (see Exhibit A), the azchitectural standazds listed in UDC 11-4-3-27E for multi-family developments, and conditions of approval and DA provisions listed in Exhibit B of this report. NOTE: A CZC application ma_v include multiple/all multi family structures within the development w. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance is required prior to issuance of a building permit for the commercial portion of the development Because the commercial portion of the property is located adiacent to an entrvway corridor (Eagle Road), the future structure(s) and site shall be subiect to the desiEn standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19C. x. Development of the C-C zoned portion of the site shall not occur until such time as access is provided to/from E. River Valley Road or some other frontage/backa~e street; direct lot access to Eagle Road is prohibited Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 13 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 y. A backage road shall be constructed on the east side of the C-C zoned portion of the site and across-access/ingress-egress easement shall be provided to the properties to the north and south for an extension of the backage road and future access to E. River Valley Road. A copy said cross- access/ingress-egress easement shall be provided to the Planning Department prior to issuance of the issuance of a certificate of zoning compliance application for the first multi-family building. z. The Citv will not aunrove the ordinance for annexation of the requested parcel until one of three con 'n~encies occurs• 11 Th e Kle iner Nnrth Pa rcel n A is c wnP r~ and he a n ration ordinance is 21 Th - e RO gd. W for River V all .v Str .e t is d eriioaterl to Af wi h accecc t Ea 31 Th gle R e RO oad. W fOr Allevc Wav/R ecnrr ic Rr ...ra ie r~nA.n otoa +., Anu~ with a'rview Ave n ~ o r t ick R oad Thi wo old a low temnorarv t he eastern ewe r nc v acce u ntil ~ h ' m as iy r Va lev Str Note• eet is The constructed City does not g uara ntee that anv of thes e cnnditinnc n~av occur condit withi ions n the one-vea may be modifi r tim ed th e fram roug e o h the f the DA an DA mndif nrova~ These icatinr, nrn~occ 2. Conditional Use Permit (CUP): The applicant has submitted a site plan (stamped by Scott Stanfield on „'~ 3/12/08, included as Exhibit A.2). The site plan depicts 9multi-family residential structures consisting of a total of 204 residential units and a 5,868, square foot clubhouse for the portion of the site proposed to be zoned R-40. These units consist of 28 1- bedroom units consisting of 833 square feet (s.f.) each; 20 1-bedroom Executive units consisting of 871 s.f. each; 104 2-bedroom units consisting of 1,037 s.f. each; 28 Z-bedroom Executive units consisting of 1,110 s.f. each; and 24 3-bedrom units consisting of 1,228 s.f. each (see floor plan ofmulti-family units in Exhibit A.10). The overall square footage of residential uses proposed for the property is 209,144 s.f. The applicant states that this project will not be phased but may take a couple of years to construct. Parking is provided on the site for the multi-family units as follows: There are 7 garage structures depicted on the plan that contain 6 parking spaces each for a total of 42 enclosed spaces; 233257 carport parking spaces are provided that allow for a total of X95299 covered spaces; and ~3109 open stalls are provided for a total of 408 parking stalls provided on the site (see covered parking analysis below for more information on compliance with UDC standards). .Per UDC 11-3C-SB, all off-street parking areas shall be provided with a substantial wheel restraint to prevent cars from encroaching upon abutting private and public property or overhanging beyond the designated parking stall dimensions. Wheel stops are not depicted on the site plan. The applicant must either install wheel stops for all parking adjacent to sidewalks or landscaping or the sidewalk or landscape area may be widened 2 feet to allow for vehicle overhang, and the stall length may be reduced by 2 feet (from 19' to 17'). Bicycle parking is also required on the site as follows: 1 bicycle parking space is required for every 25 proposed vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof, per UDC 11-3C-6G. Because 408 parking stalls are proposed on the site, l6 bicycle spaces are required to be provided. As a provision of the DA, the applicant shall submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 14 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 for approval of all of the parking and common areas on the site prior to submittal of CZC's for structures. Several amenities are proposed on the site in compliance with UDC standards (see amenities analysis below for more information). The property proposed to be zoned C-C is included on the site plan with a conceptual plan of how the property may develop in the future; however, no development of the 1.5 acre C-C property is proposed at this time. If the property is annezed, a backage road should be constructed along the east boundary of the commercial district, in compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-4B3. Further, across-access/ingress-egress easement should be provided to the properties to the north and south of the site. No development of this site should occur until the backage road is connected to River Valley Road. Per UDC 11-2A-2, Multi-family Developments require conditional use permit approval and must comply with the Specific Use Standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 as follows: a. Setbacks: Buildings shall provide a minimum setback of 10 feet, unless a greater setback is otherwise required by the UDC. (UDC Table 11-2A-7 requires a greater setback of 15 feet in the rear.) The building envelopes shown on the site plan meet the minimum setback requirements stated However, the structures shown along the south boundary encroach approximately l2 feet into the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District's easement for the Downey SublateraL (See discussion below under "ditches, canals, & laterals ") b. Service areas: On-site service areas, outdoor storage areas, waste storage, disposal facilities, and transformer or utility vaults shall be fully screened from view from any public street. The Applicant shall comply with this requirement. c. Private, usable open space: A minimum of 80 square feet of private, usable open space shall be provided for each unit. This requirement can be satisfied through porches, patios, decks, and/or enclosed yards. Landscaping, entryway and other access ways shall not count toward this requirement. Private usable open space is proposed for each unit that exceeds the minimum amount required by the UDC. (1 bedroom units contain 84 square feet of deck area, and 2 do 3 bedroom units contain 81 square feet of deck area.)(See floor plan attached in Exhibit A.10.) Staff is supportive of the proposed private, usable open space. d. Developments with 20 units or more shall provide the following: A property management office, a maintenance storage area, a central mailbox location (including provisions for parcel mail), and a directory and map of the development at a convenient location. This development does contain more than 20 units and will comply with this requirement. A property management office and central mailbox location with parcel storage is proposed within the clubhouse (see clubhouse floor plan in Exhibit A.II). A directory and map of the development is shown at the entrance of the development on the landscape plan (see Exhibit A.3). The applicant states that the maintenance storage area will be located within garage building #1. Staff is supportive of the proposed amenities. e. Covered Parking: UDC 11-3C-6 requires that multifamily developments shall provide parking as follows: for 1 bedroom units, there shall be two parking spaces with one in a covered carport or garage; and for units with more than one bedroom, Z parking spaces shall be provided in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 481-bedroom units, which requires 48 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces. The site plan shows 156 units with more than 1 bedroom, which requires 312 covered spaces. A total of 408 stalls; 360 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces are required on the site. The Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE I S CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 applicant has provided X95 299 covered spaces and X3109 uncovered spaces. A variance is requested for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required from 360 to X95 299. Staff is not supportive of the proposed parking variance. (see Variance analysis below) f. Common Open Space Design Requirements: UDC 11-4-3.27C requires a minimum of 250 square feet of outdoor common open space for each unit containing more than 500 square feet and up to 1,200 square feet of living area, and 350 square feet for each unit containing more than 1,200 square feet of living area. (The common open space shall be not less than 400 square feet in area, and shall have a minimum length and width dimension of 20 feet.) Based on the square footage of the proposed units, a total of 53, 400 square feet of common open space is required; 83, 312 square feet of open space is proposed on the site plan, which complies with this requirement. f. Amenities: UDC 11-4-3.27 requires that multi-family developments with 75 units or more provide 4 amenities with at least one from each category (i.e. quality of life, open space, or recreation). Further, for multi-family developments with more than 100 units, the decision making body shall require additional amenities commensurate to the size of the proposed development. Because 204 units are proposed with this development at least 4 amenities are required. Staff believes that the applicant more than complies with this requirement by providing the following qualifying amenities: 1) walking trails, 2) clubhouse, 3) water feature, 4) swimming pool, S) a putting green, 6) several gazebos, and 7) a tot lot. g. Elevations: Elevations are required to meet the architectural standards set forth in UDC 11-4-3-27E. The applicant is proposing 9 multi family structures, S of which consist of d~erent elevations (they aren't all the same). The structures are all proposed to have brick veneer masonry, stucco, stone veneer, andfiberglass-reinforced asphalt shingles. All of the structures are 2-3 stories in height, have the same architectural design and appearance but are different in size based on how many units they contain. One single- story clubhouse structure is also proposed with the same construction materials as the multi family structures. No colors are listed for the structures on the elevations but the colored drawing the applicant submitted contained in Exhibit A.6 depict 4 different colors on one structure. All of the structures within the development should have a mix of colors and materials as depicted on the colored elevation and architectural elevations contained in Exhibit A. The proposed elevations appear to comply with the architectural standards. If approved, full compliance with the elevation requirements cited in UDC 11- 4-3-27E, and the elevations submitted with the subject CUP, will be required with the future issuance of Certificate of Zoning Compliances on this site. h. Landscaping: Per UDC 11-4-3-27, all street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundation. The foundation landscaping shall meet the following standards: The landscaped area shall be at least 3-feet wide; - For every 3 linear feet of foundation, an evergreen shrub having a minimum mature height of 24 inches shall be planted; and - Ground cover plants shall be planted in the remainder of the landscaped area. i. Maintenance and Ownership Responsibilities: Per UDC 11-4-3-27G, a legally binding document shall be recorded that states the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including, but not limited to, structures, parking, common areas, and other development features. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 16 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 Access: Access to the site is proposed from the future River Valley Road and an emerslency only access to/from Allvs Way. •~ 2~ ~ ,.+..:,]° i,.,1a ~ ,~ .7°....~°a .. aL.,...;a._ ~1..~ ~-~-- T'--~- ^ - - ~Y , , -- s +~vc: Var1 ~V fE E1'3 F~-'1~17i7}aiF`}1 timfit~+ 1.a • 1 ~... D' [7 11 Oa r.C ~2i~ t~2Pr~E23i~1C~i~a~'j7~PC-Qo~ co~cicoscr-c~azoTCF9aaacaaarg cxt~ic-cscc~Sa-v2 .fn r ..l.a ;«/«..ti.4 4 4 L' 1 D .7 ~. -- at T ~ L 1" Y I b` baa Trtr-cn~rl~~ti~n Ilan u' +• 1• Trr[ t,., ..+..°f ; °a ., a,.,.:..;__ _ _raL_ _ ~ ~_~_ _r r r ~ s - " ' ~ e However, Staff spoke with Matt Edmonds at ACHD and he stated that the applicant will be required to construct half the street section of E. River Valley Road abutting the site consisting of 24 feet of pavement and a 7-foot wide sidewalk (as proposed by the applicant). The applicant is proposing to dedicate and construct the whole right-of--way for Allys Way on the eastern portion of the site. Matt did not think that an emergency access point to Allys (as required by City Staff) to/from the site would be a problem. Further, ACHD is requiring a road trust deposit for half of the construction cost of the bridge over the South Slough. Stub Streets: ~° ~~•'- ~*-'°°~~ - ° °a °-~ *~° '* ~ .The Fire Department is Y« requesting that a stub street be provided from the site to Allys Way because of fire code requirements for the number of dwellings proposed; the applicant has revised the site plan to include an emer~encv only access to Allys Wav which staff is supportive of. Staff has included a condition requiring construction of and access to Allys Way for this development. Ally's Way: The future alignment of Ally's Way, which exists north of the site, north of Ustick Road at the % mile, lies along the eastern boundary of the subject property. As part of the development of this site, the applicant will be required to dedicate right-of--way and construct Allys Way in accordance with ACRD standards. Further, staff has included a DA provision that an emer~ency only access be provided to/from Allys Way for this development. Existing ResidencesBuildings: The site currently contains some existing outbuildings that were associated with a previous residence. The remainder of the site consists of vacant land. All existing buildings shall be removed prior to release of building permits for this development. Fencing: The applicant is proposing to construct 6-foot tall vinyl fencing along the west property boundary and 6-foot tall chain link fencing along the north side of the property adjacent to the South Slough. Temporary construction fencing is required to be installed where permanent fencing is not proposed, around the residential portion of the site prior to issuance of building permits to contain debris during construction. Fencing shall be constructed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. Landscape Plan: The applicant submitted a conceptual landscape plan for the residential portion of the site dated ~ 1/08. The applicant should note the following and/or make revisions to the landscape/site plan as follows: Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along the future extension of E. River Valley Road, as proposed. If NMID will not allow landscanin~ (i. e. trees) within their easement for the Downey Sublateral and if Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 17 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HE~G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the street buffer, the applicant shall provide an additional 5 foot wide stria for landscaping outside of the NMID easement, per UDC 11-3B-7CIb• • Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along Allys Way; • Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 35-foot wide street buffer will be required along Eagle Road/SH 55, an entryway corridor (upon development of the commercial portion of the site when annexed). • If the property proposed to be annexed with a C-C zoning district is annexed, and at the time of CZC submittal there is a residence adjacent, a 25-foot wide buffer shall be provided along the east and/or south boundaries of the commercial site. • Per UDC 11-3B-8C, a 5-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer is required adjacent to parlang and vehicular use areas along the north boundary of the site and adjacent to the existing residence on the west boundary of the site. Said buffer is required to be planted with one tree per 351inear feet and shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative ground cover. If NMID will not allow trees within their easement for the South Slough, the applicant may apply for Alternative Compliance in accordance with UDC 11-SB-5. • A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway and bridge over the South Slough shall be provided on the site in accordance with the Parks Department conditions contained in Exhibit B and the standards in the Master Pathways Plan and UDC 11-3A-8. • With the first CZC application, include mitigation details for the 9 existing trees on the site, consisting of 120 caliper inches, proposed to be removed, in compliance with UDC 11-3B-10. Contact Elroy Huff, City Arborist, 888-3579 for more details. • A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted with the CZC application per the requirements on the CZC checklist, the conditions of approval noted in Exhibit B, in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B. A detailed review of the final landscaping on this site will take place with the first Certificate of Zoning Compliances) application for the parking areas on this site. The aforementioned notes/revisions should be reflected on a revised plan submitted with the CZC application. Mitigation: The site plan depicts 9 existing trees, consisting of 120 caliper inches, on the site that are proposed to be removed upon development of the property. Per UDC 11-3B-10, mitigation is required for all existing trees 4-inch caliper or greater removed form the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of 100% replacement. Staff recommends that the applicant comply with the mitigation standards listed in UDC 11- 3B-IOC. Multi-Use Pathway: The Parks Department has submitted the following analysis on the multi-use pathway required on this site: The Meridian Pathways Master Plan depicts a future public pathway along the north side of the South Slough (aka Finch Lateral or Finch Creek), which crosses the canal near the location of the future Pedestrian Bridge depicted on the site plan, continues south through the subject property and connects to the intersection of River Palley Road and Eagle Road. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 18 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~i DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 With the recent annexation of the Meridian Town Center property, we expect to have a future pathway built in the proposed 60-acre park along the south side of the South Slough, east of Alley's Way/Records Drive. This will provide for another future pathway connection point. To connect with the future pathway in 60-acre park site, we recommend constructing the sidewalk along the north side of River Palley Street as a 10- foot, detached multi-use pathway. A north/south public pathway connection through the project, ~-• ~^-~°~'~^~~^ •~•~*' *' p^`~~~•^••° ~~ ~`~•° D'~-•, is also required between River Valley Street and the pedestrian bridge. The applicant has agreed to make the connection, but has requested that this connection be allowed to be S feet wide (on the proposed sidewalks) instead of the standard 10 feet wide due to potential impacts to the project. c'^~'~~-~~ •~° *' ^~ ^ s~an~d~lis~e~bzBC ~1 ~1-~ Staff supports this request provided the applicant maintains the narrower pathway, sign it for the public, and construct a 10-foot north-south connection along Ally's Way. (Please see conditions of approval in Exhibit B.) Ditches, Laterals, and Canals: The South Slough runs along the northern boundary of this site. The Downey Sublateral runs along the southern boundary of the site. Per UDC 11-3A-6 all irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of any natural waterway, that intersect, cross or lie within the area being subdivided shall be covered. The South Slough is a natural waterway and will remain open; the Downey Lateral shall be covered Per the Comprehensive Plan, the South Slough should be improved and protected with development of this properly. Note: The structures depicted on the site plan along the southern boundary encroach approximately 12 feet within Nampa Meridian Irrigation District's easement for the Downey SublateraL Staff spoke with Steve Earl, Mason & Stanfield, regarding this issue and he stated that the lateral was going to be relocated 25 feet to the south. If the lateral is relocated, the structures would no longer be within the easement: At the time of CZC application, the easement should have already been relocated, OR the structures shall be relocated outside of the easement The applicant should submit a letter from NMID prior to the next Commission action on this project documenting that they are amenable to relocating the lateral and easement ~'°°*~° ; r.,.rr:.... ..a ,, _. ~.~,nr...:» __ _..__.. If NMID will not allow landscaping (i.e. trees) within their easement for the Downey Sublateral and if there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the street buffer. the applicant shall provide an additional 5-foot wide stria for landscaping outside of the NMID easement, per UDC 11-3B-7CIb; Pressure Irrigation: The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, asingle-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single- point connection is used, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. An underground, pressurized irrigation system should be installed to all landscape areas per the approved specifications and in accordance with UDC 11-3A-15 and MCC 9-1-28. Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 19 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC): Staff is requesting as a DA provision, that a CZC application be submitted for approval of all parking and common areas on the site prior to submittal of CZC's for structures on the site. Additionally, a Certificate of Zoning Compliance is required prior to issuance of a building permit for any and all of the proposed multi-family and/or commercial structures within this development. All structures must substantially comply with the building elevations submitted with this application (see Exhibit A), the architectural standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27E for multi-family developments, and conditions of approval and DA provisions listed in Exhibit B of this report. Additionally, any future structure(s) proposed on the commercial portion of the development is required to comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19C for structures located along entryway corridors. NOTE: A CZC application may include multiple/all multi family structures within the development. Private Streets: The applicant is not proposing private streets within this development. For addressing purposes, the Fire Department and Public Works is requesting that private streets be provided within this development. The applicant shall submit a Private Street application to the City prior to the City Council meeting. Per UDC 11-3F- 4, all private streets shall be designed and constructed to the following standards: A. Design standards: 1. Easement: The private street shall be constructed on a perpetual ingress/egress easement or a single platted lot that provides access to all applicable properties. 2. Connection point: Where the point of connection of the private street is to a public street, the private street shall be approved by the Transportation Authority. 3. Emergency vehicle: The private street shall provide sufficient maneuvering area for emergency vehicles as determined and approved by the Meridian Fire Department. 4. Gates: Gates or other obstacles shall not be allowed. B. Construction standards: 1. For conversion of an existing facility to a private street at the direction of the Fire Marshall: a. All drive aisles shall be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed. b. If a curb exists next to the drive aisle, it shall be painted red. 2. For all other private streets: a. Roadway and storm drainage: The private street shall be constructed in accord with the roadway and storm drainage standards of the Transportation Authority or as approved by the City of Meridian based on plans submitted by a certified engineer. b. Street width: The private street shall be constructed within the easement and shall have a travel lane width of twenty-four (24) feet or twenty-six (26) feet as determined by the Fire Marshal relative to the height and size of the proposed structures that adjoin the private street. Due to the height of the proposed structures, the Fire Department is requiring a travel lane of 26 feet: ~egn~e~ree~t~ The site elan submitted with the private street application reflects this reauiremen~ Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 20 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 c. Sidewalks: Afive-foot (5') attached sidewalk or four-foot (4') detached sidewalk shall be provided on one side of the street in commercial districts. This requirement may be waived if the applicant can demonstrate that an alternative pedestrian path exists. Five foot wide detached sidewalks are proposed in front of the structures adjacent to parking. d. Fire lanes: All drive aisles shall be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed. In addition, if a curb exists next to the drive aisle, it shall be painted red. x~fff~'.S-t~aA~ ~~f~l•P-~AGt~/~'~T SS tc-~r +L, t+' ~ 't a t + oa rrt ~ a • i r Y 7 1~~Efaxxt~l~FtF1'r~l i.c riu +1 +>1 1 0.,+.. Q+ ~ n• , I~E~EB~I r~t7~FSt/~1-i17 tl ~ 4. r7o..e1.....~..e..+ F41. + -i t -1--~ - ® ., +~,......,. + .t ~ i ~ -- ---_- ---------.,.,...~..r~ ........, .. w --~ ----- r»tF ,.o .. a '+~ ,a'~ t+ F +L, n',_ + F + cxR}} E1~i~fLliSr 1@~ ~"i-Y , ~a:mc ~ ~.1~ ~ , ~) I f1~~mpfiPl'lA0'I.Cn7 Di ' TT ' llo..el e..+!'~ .7 ..+ 1' -'+• - + + • e , €~d~gS{~eF-7r~lE~ 3$~~ c-iixr-v~k$i~EB-41'1,'Fla-17F1t Il(~-~(itritnto + 1 + +l. l~l 1, i+l. ~C ti .~ it --- - > > s ~ , s • Annlicant withdrew request for temnorarv access at the Commission hearing on March 6 2008 4. Variance (VAR-08-002): The applicant is requesting approval of a Variance to UDC Table 11-3 C-6 for a reduction in the number of parking spaces required for multi-family dwellings in covered carports or garages. UDC 11-3C-6 requires multi-family dwellings with 1 Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 21 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA1~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 bedroom to have 2 parking spaces per unit, 1 in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 48 -bedroom units, which requires 48 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces. Multi-family dwellings with more than 1 bedroom are required to have 2 parking spaces per unit in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 156 units with more than 1 bedroom, which requires 312 covered spaces. A total of 360 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces are required on the site (408 total spaces required). The applicant has provided ~9-S 299 covered spaces and ~3109 uncovered space (408 total spaces proposed). A variance is requested for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required from 360 spaces to ~9-S 299 spaces. The reason for the variance is that an 80-foot wide Nampa Meridian Irrigation District (NMID) easement exists along the entire northern boundary of the site where the South Slough is located. NMID does not allow permanent structures to be built within their easement. In order to grant a variance, the City Council is required to make the following findings (per UDC 11-SB-4E): a. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district; b. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; and c. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. Staff has reviewed these findings and while Staff does not believe that granting the requested variance would be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare, Staff does find that granting the subject variance would allow a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district for multi-family developments. Further, Staff does not believe an undue hardship exists because of characteristics of the site in which the City should grant a variance. Staff believes that a residential structure(s) could be removed and the site redesigned in order to have additional room for the amount of UDC required covered parldng spaces. For these reasons, Staff recommends that the requested variance for a reduction in the number of covered parldng spaces required be denied and the required parldng be provided on the site per UDC requirements. (Please see Exhibit D for a detailed analysis of the required facts and findings for a variance request.) 5. Private Street (PS-08-004): The Applicant submitted a Private Street application on 4/18/08 requesting approval of private streets within the development, per requirement of Staff for addressing purposes. The applicant is proposing 26-foot wide streets within the site, per requirement of the Fire Department Staff is supportive of the proposed private street application. The proposed private streets shall be constructed in accordance with the standards listed above, per UDC 11-3F-4. b. Staff Recommendation: p~>aa, ac~es~~la~-a~d~truetu~ec-aQen~'e=~~e~ c..~en~,-ande °••+O l••'•1°_•'•,` a~oeen~eeei~~ed~eu} Zicrm~ aaQirn~~ma~~ ra-rcq~t~hiS sv-sac r °c`~i~ioa~ co Tac~n icraw~cu~~ium . Staff is generally supportive of the requested annexation & zoning of 10.56 acres to R-40, ~° ^^* m•^~^~*~-•° ^F and the request for annexation & zoning of 1.5 acres to C-C (see Analysis, Section 10, for more information). Further, staff is generally supportive of the CUP for amulti-family development, but is not supportive of °~~-~ the requested Variance application. Staff is supportive of the request for private street (PS-08- Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 22 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 004) within the develoument Therefore, staff recommends approval of the subject AZ CLIP and PS applications and denial of the subject VAR application See the Analysis in Section 10 and the Findings in Exhibit D of the staff report. and CUP request he Meri ian itV oLnc~l h AYr~ *hPCa itpmc nn April ') Mac 7n av 27.2008. At the nub is hearin on Mav 27 2008 the ounc'1 approved he ubiec A7 and CLip reauect_ 11. EXHIBITS A. Drawings 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map 2. Site Plan (dated: "~ 3/12/08 3. Landscape Plan (dated: ~ 1/08) 4. Elevations for Building A 5. Elevations for Buildings B & C 6. Colored Elevations for Buildings B & C (24 unit structure) 7. Elevations for Buildings D, E, & F 8. Elevations for Buildings G & H 9. Elevations for Building I 10. Floor Plans ofMulti-Family Units 11. Clubhouse Elevations & Floor Plan 12. Gazebo Elevations 13. Garage Buildings #1 & #7 -Elevations & Floor Plan 14. Garage Buildings #2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 -Elevations & Floor Plan B. Comments/Conditions of Approval 1. Planning Department (DRAFT) 2. Public Works Department 3. Fire Department 4. Police Department 5. Parks Department 6. Sanitary Service Company 7. Ada. County Highway District soi~; C. Legal Descriptions & Exhibit Maps 1. Proposed Annexation Area 2. Proposed R-40 Boundary Regency at River Valley (revised) C 1Y 4 ~~i PAGE 23 ~'i y - i G ~_ ~ ' }_~ f 1'. 3}~~ ,l ~: ~'= ri l ,it za ti ~ ~ .5 i. ~ ,` 1 ~ },• `y`' r, IL' ~~ ~! ~;` ~ '~ fi` i,. ~, y: i` [. i' .a { CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 3. Proposed C-C Boundary D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 24 t~ j ~ ~' ~; lz < [ 1 ~+ 5 . ~ ~ i t ~ ~ 1 r < . ~ ~~ ~ a~ ~t' ~~ LC ~ p' -r ~ t' a~ ~i< ~ ~ T ~ ~ r~'~' ) ~ ~'~ ~ F ~ ~' ~ S ti ' ~ t~ ~ fi i;~ ~ ~ < f ~ .E L a ~ z~, t i~ 3 t9 ~ i ,a ~~ ~ , `' ~ y ' 1 i ~ ~ ~ 11 i ~ ~ c ~ ~t x~ ~, a t } ; i ~ f ~ ~~ ~ h i f~ ~ f ~. ~ ~~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ Y i~ t S ~~ ~, ~ FFF t ~ t ! ~ i ~ S ~ 6 ~ " ~ .. ~~, ~ x ~~r k: ' ' . ` -~ i ' ~? ppp~ ~ , ~ , ~ s ~ ~ ~ r ~ 1 F ~'i ri ~~ ' ~+t 'l~ k ~ ~ j~ ~ :F i i Y ~ lf { 6' z ~ ~ 3 !}~~ S' ~i~ '~ ~i" CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAN~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE I~iING DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 A. Drawings 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map -- ~I ~I 1~8 _ d~*~ I~1C 1~IlAlI~!1~ 1~1C , W FI a- ~. z, a Z ~ 1~ 15 Rr8i ~ .r RI GG Site e n ar1'k~E NE~,. tr I ^ ~~ A ~1 ~~ cT Frr ~;~ Exhibit A 1~ 4 RI iWl ~--~~ m t~ l ~,~ - ~y W yo > E 0 ~L ~ ~ W ;' a xi ~ a~ a ~ ~} $ y `--+_a ~ ~1~". 3: a' Q, -- z ~i >; ~. z E z - - - .. -E~ 1-. E W a; ~,' W 3I~ lE st al l7' ¢. _ >; ~~ i-- - - z 2D __ VE CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 Z. Site Plan (dated: ~ 3/12/08 es I ~ca~a. ! ~ ~~~ ~ ems'' f 1 * ~~~ ~ tl .~ ~` 4.~,e. Y .. ~HeRa4rN i ~~ ~i ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ }~~ i~ f ~e ~ ~~ ~ l c'f .., i -~ =.r RE[.+°FNFVAT'R/B/FR VAG~-f..~'Y A e17fm016 flE 8 !/16 QE ~ ly$ H~LSQ 6 iH~ ~~ --~..n _._.._s~. ~ _ ~vWz.., - ~ _.~. ~ ,~ F`~tb°°if~ :~ ~° ~a_ ~~~~~~~~ ~.V~m. ~ 6fiN4 ~MS®b i o. ~ ~ I ~_ i- A/p ®eOC~.ru ~ ~~±~`~ ~~ + •--+ - ¢ '~,~' ~_ tl ~ '~ ~. l ) t3Ltl Lsil_, y~el~llf ~ ~ ~~- s ~ ~~ r~r ~~ s• _... eeca:c~ eax ^nm vuin mw e1N kilkDtrv ~` ~® '; ~e,a~~~® gypp, ~ ~ e era mar . A9 i 6 YGSW ~I g~ a:o.~ ~9 ~~ t ' a~~ p 0~~'gAT~+U 6 ~' q M-0Ri Yi iCL®NC31 ~. .gCyi, V ' ~ ~ n Sy 111eipf ~ ~3 N (~ !9 hh~ 4SU5 4 6®GCpitRa yeLL i'cpYtie S9li p n .e u4Ca ~~ R MA FPJIY frst'~ N~ R ~ ~ ~ p .~~~ ~~ n ~' ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ &®2A ~ .`~.~ e 1 ~~~f ~ ~~4er ~~ ~ a Wm B~@8 ti ~:. ~ - - ~, _.o.~. eer•.r~ ~~~~a~., W n~ ~...:,, e,z r "' ~ .. Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 3. Landscape Plan (dated: '~ 1/08 Gi ~' ~; t F . ~ FY.' ~ +maa, 0 --'-'`a'~~+r - •.9 . 8 ~~ ~ ---------------- uer9setecnaa 1.xAT,at~ vecc~aia 9~'AR19PCftta9'tRd o~va9a9ai~iir Exhibit A ~!? + Y conr~E~ruru sizE Pt.a~ R/ARCM 91-~18 .4PARituiEN1' f9DH1MUNITY ll9ERIliAW ID14H~ %mf A(~ft6' 1r71y1~+4 Y5i Ca~eeA ami a~ StJc f•s,. ,. 11~~te C2 Cvra~+btm 4R34CU~! R3*t~ng 61,YiB 1S 4~' ~~C ~. ~ -.~_L.'i. t~_ ~.- ra tm uv ~c~v~ f -: _ ~/N, -'deter; _ _ .r - -. _ ~© ~ ~ ~` fir/ ~ - ud. T~~p { ~ 1 ~~ ~e r p - - m i~Rt7Pa75®a:RST PovC-a YnLLEY 6Ti~if M8 ACA N,NG -,~".••.,' "'"®~ -'~ ~a~r~r+rra¢tsmv .....~._.~.._.._-._.~.._.._._.._.._..~..~..m..~..... ... ~~ ~ d Q S '6 (1 g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d '~ J ~.+ !~ '~ ~y W m ~.W } p w~ a F ~ ~~ ~ ~~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 4. Elevations for Building A SSE ELEV+TEJA -.~. AE+F ELE': s710M1 ~E~ m~crrr Etavmou s¢E ELF+anrH Exhibit A ~` ~a ~~~ 3 ~~ Q F Q u'~ Q A~ ~~ m CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 Elevations for Buildings B & C Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THERING DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 6. Colored Elevations for Buildings B & C (24 unit structure) r~ ~~'~` $rr: - __~ ~~ r ~ ~ ~ ~.,.' a _` ' s~. +~ ~^+~ II~19~64tiWu01{Wun(tu~ ~uinlo-p Ord ',~ -- ~. - ~ . j A -~_ k'„~ _ ~ ~k: , ~_`~ ~' ,:fir ~ ~w Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE RING DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 7. Elevations for Buildings D, E, & F Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 8. Elevations for Buildings G & H Exhibit A Z -.- • "L' a. .~ s ~~~ .,«y, ,ter .- FFCIdF~Cl~ _ 8 -32q m ~~57 s Pl :q~ ®~ ~d '~ A~ ~~ m ea ~r m t ~9 4~ ~9 m CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA1~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 9. Elevations for Building I Exhibit A e~a~3 ~6 /` ~~S ~' 9 F 9 Vi 2 4 ~~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE RING DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 10. Floor Plans ofMulti-Family Units . ~- ~, ~. ~a~~ ~~~ , 8~ ¢Ob 3 BEDROOtCI PLAtS ~ ,~ -mot ~ t. ~ ~ ~ ~~•~.~ ^ ~ ~ ~,~ ~i ~ ~~ ~` i umm~m ~ uaaamu vss!oca~m ~~' I ML4 ~ ~L McC 1 2 H€DR~0.d PiAN ~ ~° 9 H£DRDOM PUN -r -•- -•-- -~- - -- - - - - -~ ~- -~-- - i ~- • •- - -~- - i i ly ~ nE, ~nava j i mr..rncm~.+ ~nmoima+ I `~tlD~' ~+ ' I ~ I I i ~uq i ~q.~ ~ I oana wnN ~ ~ s°e~D~m Ica i - Exhibit A @$~~~ ~. e - ~~ A~p} m 9 ~ j ~ ~ ~P i ~~ f ~~ ~ ~; F ~° `a , i ,~ ~ ~, ~ ~ t ~9~ ~ ;' ~ ~ ' I °. ~ is ~ ~ ~. , f ~ i ~ 'pi ~ ~ ~ ~~g~ ~ k t ~ ~ ~ - x ~ ~ ~ `` ° `~ ~ r i C ~~~I ` i C ~ e i i ~ E'~ j ~t ! i ~ { j~ ~ t Ir~ 5. ~ i ' ~ ~ ~ ~ I I . ~+ - ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 Fi t~ F ~%~ ~ . ~ ~ ,_ ~ _ i. ~ ~ 1. s ~ ~ t ~ i f ~ ~ t~~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ I ~ ' ~~ ~ ' f k` ~ ~. ~ ~~, ~ s a i I a ~ a C:,> x ~ z ? ~ i F 1~ ~ s pp C ~ 1' ~ ~'. ~ f; ~~ i ~ ;sl I ~? ': ~Ei'~ .. ~: ~ ,i g ,'.. ,~ •.~- ~3%.`,`: j ~ S ! ~i :. ' ~e :? j ~ t~ l ~ i CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE~RING DATE OF MAY Z0, 2008 11. Clubhouse Elevations & Floor Plan ~J 'Ijlp ,~ =~. °>~ --- „^ ~`~ f FLV pPre11~'. .m.! m ij§ t t .~ r r___________ r------r-----~ l °e a°'~ _ I I I I ~ I I L______~Ikik3k dk dkdkdk dkdkdkdk ikdk dkdkdka-______~ I I I ~ III II II II II II II II II II II II II II II III I I I ~ I,_ I I I -1- I I Inuuunnunuuuununul FI~9F9F 9F 9F9F4F ~F~~xF 9F~F 9F~9F1 I I I L-- I -- I -I I I ~ I I ,~ ~ I I I ~------- ---- --------+ o~ I I ~ I ----- i ~ cur ' I ® ® ____ ______ ~ ~ I I COV8i2G VATIO i I g 8 I I r _____J I IJUU I I I I ~ I NIE~DtA I I I 41ECF1, I ~ r- -J I I r~tJiPAtMnvJ'.O7V I r-----~ 1 ____ ____ ~ ~ __ . HI~AC4E -__ ____ _-_ _ ____ __ -.iM6~Ai0 pg~K ~ ~ I i^ r--_______, ___ ~ F / _____~ L PtWf~lfi lff.N9 I I I I I ~ eOATA ~ I i OFEAT ROOM i I I I I I I -- I I I I I I --__ I q I I I I I I L___~=..1 PP~ERTY I II I j a ~ , I I I I 1 C~IfAFE I`'i, I ~ I I I I I g I I I'. I Y--1-- I --I---I I I I I ~ _-_-----~ - - I I ~ I ~ I I ~ ~ ~_ __ __ __ __ ___ .~ I I I 1 I ~ 1 ®n I I i I I I ~ ------__-__.. I I I I eaum.o. I I I I I wswu~ww n I L ^ ______ y______ I J Exhibit A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE RING DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 12. Gazebo Elevations ~v 0 R:~F fUJ~ r~ ~. ~ 'i_'~=::•~'?': Y~: ice:. - '~"~ ~~ ~T .~i ~. ~_ ,~S 6.:.~: f.:~ ~ ~[ta r~: fi'" ncxrnc~.ncutiJ Fs rr~~nr~+ancu~ Exhibit A `~=~~~ ~~.: a~:~ a~ B~ ~~S m z a F oo (NQm U ~ ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ y 1 f ~ . r i~ 'M S .#pE}j7 ~11IF 1~3{1 ~ ) ~ ~~ a i 31 „f ~ /, ~ k ~ [ a .~~ i ti ~ . ~ ~.~~ [ 1 3 r 1 t>~~~ , ' fj r`~ ..~ .i~ ~ 6 `~ C 1; ti~. 1~ J ~ 1 4 J' . ~ ~. f~ +w, i ~ ,. i ' ~~ 'f . F " 1 'F ' d ' ' ~ ~ ~L i ~ , j ~ 4 ~ A ~1 . ;. ' f~ ~ t ~ ~ y S {5 jn s t x ~ ft ~ ~ ' t . ~ ,.k ,. "f . t ~ ~ t~,, ~ ~ !~ ~ r ~:~ c r r ~,' ~. ~ ~ g t :~ z t :• ~ ~ s t if ;t, ~ i f~~ r ~~ t '' s e. ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE RING DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 13. Garage Buildings #1 & #7 -Elevations & Floor Plan 1 ~vr e~:r~n=u -a--~~ IE ~~~ m=Irt ma',~n~l~ ., ,p.ce r~.:~s r-uu a~ ca^ ~~ FeaF e{evaflap ~ `'r' , ~.+ ~~~i -,: r~~nrae:m~r. ~.,-. ~.°& ~~-e tt=~s c4r, «, ~~ Exhibit A '~ ~~i ~p e ro~ ~~ ~~ ' ] 3 y 4 ~ ~ .~ ~ ~~,. P 3 ~~ t1 '~ ~~ ~ r 1 )i t~ 2 ~ i i f S r ~~ ; s 5 I ~ ~ ~, Z~ ~ ~ ! k f i' ~' F; II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~' ~ ` ' ~ p ~~ ! ~ ~} ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r f 2 ~ ~, ~ ~ , ~ ' ~• x, ~ ~ ~ f~ t ~ ~ S `~ I':' ' ~ ~~. j 1 1 5 3 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAI~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 14. Garage Buildings #2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 -Elevations & Floor Plans ~r aee~wric~t< r,~-~~r j r wicHr srE~.an~~rd ~- c,~~~se ~n~~k r-r.:r4 ~z~~~ Exhibit A r¢~F E~~dcnor~ ~~~ "fit P~1 ~T ~:'.'_ T Wig: T :. r _ w. y -=t - r - _ _ -_ ~_. ~. T-g 4~E _ _ Fk~lhT ELE~aai1DP. *~-- _.z3 _;~~ ~~ ~. - ~~ ~~ ~E~ ~` ~' f"~~~... T ~ ._ ~. ~ ~ ~ s 2R_f$t-4~! --. FiT E. T-E z 4 w z ~~ ~g CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 B. E~Conditions of Approval 1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT (DRAFT) 1.1 Annexation & Zoning Comments 1.1.1 The legal description submitted with the application (stamped on June 14, 2006 by Darin Holzhey, PLS) is accurate and meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and Idaho State Tax Commission 1.1.2 The applicant's request for annexation and zoning of 10.56 acres to R-~W is approved. The applicant's request for annexation and zoning of 1.5 acres to C-C is net approved. 1.1.3 Prior to annexation ordinance approval, the applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City. Said Development Agreement shall be signed within H-~ent~ of the City Council's approval of this application. See section 10 above for analysis and comments regarding the Planning Department recommended Development Agreement provisions. 1.2 Site Specific Requirements -Conditional Use Permit 1.2.1 The site plan, labeled as Sheet 1 of 1, prepared by Mason & Stanfield, Inc., stamped by Scott Stanfield on „~ 3/12/08, is net approved with the conditions stated herein. "*'°~~*' ^ a~-~° ,~ .All comments of the accompanying Annexation & Zoning (AZ-08-003) application shall also be considered conditions of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP-08-004). 1.2.2 The landscape plan, prepared by Bach Homes, dated 1/08, is approved with the following modifications/notes: a. Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer is required along the future extension of E. River Valley Road. If1VMID will not allow landscaping (~.e. trees) within their easement for the Downey Sublateral and if there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the street buffer, the applicant shall provide an additional S-foot wide stria for landscaping outside of the NMID easement. per UDC II-3B-7CIb; b. Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer is required along Allys Way; c. Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 35-foot wide street buffer will be required along Eagle Road1SH 55, an entryway corridor (upon development of the commercial portion of the site when annexed). d. A 25-foot wide buffer shall be provided along the east side of the C-C zoned portion of the site adiacent to the multi-family development, and along the south side of the C-C zoned portion of the site IF a residence e~sts at the time of CZC submittal. e. Per UDC 11-3B-8C, a 5-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer is reauired adiacent to parldne and vehicular use areas along the north boundary of the site and adiacent to the e~stin~ residence on the west boundary of the site. Said buffer is required to be planted with one tree per 351inear feet and shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative ground cover. f. Include mitigation details for the 9 existing trees on the site, consisting of 120 caliper inches, proposed to be removed, in compliance with UDC 11-3B-10. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIP~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~i DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 g. Per UDC 11-4-3-27, all street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundation. The foundation landscaping shall meet the following standards: • The landscaped area shall be at least 3-feet wide; • For every 3 linear feet of foundation, an evergreen shrub having a minimum mature height of 24 inches shall be planted; and • Ground cover plants shall be planted in the remainder of the landscaped area. h. A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway and bridge over the South Slough shall be provided on the site in accordance with the Parks Department conditions contained below in Section 5, the standards in the Master Pathways Plan, and UDC 11-3A-8. Where the applicant has submitted a preliminary landscape plan and where staff has reviewed such plan, the landscaping shall be consistent with the preliminary plan with modifications as proposed by staff. The proceeding modifications and notes should be shown on a revised landscape plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application(s). 1.2.3 A Femetet~Pxi ~ e.... ~ = r~• ..: r ~.. ~ •.s.• .,.-s-dei ele = p~e$t-s~.m-ae-steed o.. n~.,....• p ~ n • • ~=oa cn-[cl cvaacsmocci$a- Twenty-six foot wide private streets shall be constructed within this development in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. Further, the applicant shall comply with all of the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4 for private streets 1.2.4 The applicant must either install wheel stops for all parking adjacent to sidewalks or landscaping or the sidewalk or landscape area may be widened 2 feet to allow for vehicle overhang, and the stall length may be reduced by 2 feet (from 19' to 17'), per UDC 11-3C-SB. 1.2.5 Bicycle parking is required to be provided on the site. Per UDC 11-3C-6G, 1 bicycle parking space is required for every 25 proposed vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof. 1.2.6 The applicant should submit a letter from Nampa Meridian Irrigation District the documenting that they are amenable to relocating the Downey Sublateral and easement that currently ezists along the southern boundary of the site. If 1VMID is not amenable to relocating the easement, the site plan shall be revised so that structures are located outside of the easement Additionally, if NMID will not allow landscaping (~e. trees) within their easement and there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the required street buffer along River Palley Road, an additional S foot wide strip shall be provided for street buffer landscaping. i+t,e .., ,.a 1.2.10 The applicant shall dedicate right-of--way and construct Allys Way in accordance with ACRD standards, in alignment with Allys Way north of the site, on the north side of Ustick Road. A stab steeet driveway shall be constructed for emergency access only to/from the site to/from Allys Way that meets the Fire Department's turning radius requirements stated below in #3.3. 1.2.13 Per UDC 11-3A-6, all irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, and waterways being used as amenities, that intersect, cross or lie within the azea being subdivided shall be covered. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department prior to construction plan approval. If lateral users association approval can not be obtained, alternate plans will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~i DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 1.2.16 All signage for the site requires approval of a sign permit. All signage must comply with UDC 11-3D-8I and 11-3D-10, Table 2, for subdivision identification signs. 1.2.17 An underground, pressurized irrigation system shall be installed to all landscape areas within the development per the approved specifications and in accordance with UDC 11-3A-15 and MCC 9- 1-28. 2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2.1 Sanitary sewer service to this development is being proposed via extension of mains in North Eagle Rd. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; the applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Water service to this site is being proposed via extension of mains in N Eagle Road. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 2.3 The applicant shall provide a 20-foot common lot for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way. The common lot shall be covered with a blanket easement to the City of Meridian. 2.4 The applicant shall provide a 20-foot easement for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easements shall not be dedicated via a plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. 2.5 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, asingle-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to issuance of building permits. 2.6 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to issuance of building permits. 2.7 All imgation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, alternate plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Meridian City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. 2.8 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 2.9 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. Z.10 Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed, drainage lots constructed, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 2.11 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to issuance of building permits 2.12 All development improvements, including but not limited to sewer, fencing, micro-paths, pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. 2.13 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to issuance of building permits 2.14 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.15 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that maybe required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.16 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.17 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.18 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.19 The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of the multifamily buildings is at least 1-foot above. 2.20 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.21 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.22 One hundred watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights shall be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior to commencing installations. 3. FIRE DEPARTMENT 3.1 Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Fire Department and water quality by the Meridian Water Department for bacteria testing. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 3.2 Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department. a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 41/z" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle. b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it. c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works specifications. d. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on corners when spacing permits. e. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'. f. Fire hydrants shall be place 18" above finish grade. g. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements of the IFC Section 509.5. h. Show all proposed or existing hydrants for all new construction or additions to existing buildings within 1,000 feet of the project. 3.3 All common driveways shall be straight or have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside and shall have a clear driving surface which is 20' wide. tlt[Ltars~ino rn,~;,.^ ..~ +i. + ^ ~i... ^;~,. ~....~s.,. ~i. ~. b ~ ^ a,.^^,.~+....,...~ a 3.4 Operational fire hydrants, temporary or permanent street signs and access roads with an all weather surface are required before combustible construction is brought on site. 3.5 To increase emergency access to the site a minimum of two points of access will be required for any portion of the project, which serves more than 50 homes. The two entrances should be separated by no less than 1/ the diagonal measurement of the full development. The applicant shall provide a stub street to the property from Allys Way at the east boundary of the site. See fire code 503.1.2 for multi-family developments over 200 units. The applicant has revised the site elan to include an emergency access to Allvs Wav; however. in order for this to meet the aforementioned reauiremen~ a street connection needs to be provided either north to Ustick or through the CenterCal project to Fairview 3.6 Commercial and office occupancies will require afire-flow consistent with the International Fire Code to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed per Appendix D. 3.7 The fire department requests that any future signalization installed as the result of the development of this project be equipped with Opticom Sensors to ensure a safe and efficient response by fire and emergency medical service vehicles. This cost of this installation is to be borne by the developer. 3.8 Maintain a separation of 5' from the building to the dumpster enclosure. 3.9 Provide a Knox box entry system for the complex prior to occupancy. 3.10 The first digit of the Apartment/Office Suite shall correspond to the floor level. 3.11 The Fire Dept. has concerns about the addressing of the existing house and the address being visible from the street which the project is addressed off of. Please contact the Addressing Specialist at 898-5500 to address this concern prior to the public hearing. 3.12 Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet (122 m) from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the code official. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183). a. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m). Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 b. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m). ° 3.13 All R-2 occupancies with 3 or more units shall be required to be fire sprinklered. 3.14 There shall be a fire hydrant within 100' of all fire department connections. 3.15 Buildings over 30' in height aze required to have access roads in accordance with The International Fire Code Appendix D Section D105. The 26' wide roads shall be required to be a max of 30' from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The fire sprinkler system is required to be upgraded to a NFPA 13; contact the Fire Department. 3.16 Emergency response routes and fire lanes shall not be allowed to have speed bumps. 3.17 Pool chemicals shall be stored in compliance with the International Fire Code. 3.18 Multi-Family and Commercial projects shall be required to provide additional 60" wide access point to the building from the fire lane to allow for the movement of manual fire suppression equipment and gurney operations. The unobstructed breaks in the pazking stalls shall be provided so that building access is provided in such a manner that the most remote part of a building can be reached with a length of 150' fire hose as measured around the perimeter of the building from the fire lane. Code complaint Handicap parking stalls may be included to assist meeting this requirement. Contact the Meridian Fire Department for details per IFC Section 504.1. 3.19 Private streets are required within the development for addressing purposes. 4. POLICE DEPARTMENT 4.1 The Police Depaztment has no concerns related to the site design submitted with the application. 5. PARKS DEPARTMENT 5.1 Applicant shall construct the sidewalk along the north side of River Valley Street as a 10-foot wide, detaslied-multi-use pathway. A detached nathwav is strongly ureferred uendin~ approval by ACl3D and NMID Applicant shall cover the cost of replacine the detached nathwav if necessary due to future irrigation facility maintenance 5.2 Applicant shall construct "°" """°; c'"'°°+ ""'' ~''° "°''~-`-'°-'--~~'-- the sidewalk along the west side of Ally's Way as a 10-foot wide multi-use nathwav. 5.3 Applicant shall construct a 5-foot wide minimum multi-use nathwav through proiect, connecting between River Valley Street and the pedestrian bridge Applicant shall maintain the 5-foot path section and sign it for public access 5.4 Applicant shall design a pedestrian crossing at the South Slough/Finch Lateral, secure necessary permits from the irrigation district and City floodplain administrator, prepare cost estimates, and provide funds in a trust for half the cost of constructing the crossing. 5.5 All pathways, except as noted in these conditions of approval shall be built to the minimum standazds published in the Comprehensive Parks & Recreation System Plan, pgs. 3-2 through 3-4, sections B and C. 5.6 An easement shall be provided for public access to and maintenance of the pathways. The City will not assume maintenance of the pathway until it connects from one major arterial road to another, unless otherwise agreed to by the Pazks & Recreation Department. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 6. SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY ^ite ~°c~z~ix-Elan-i~y re9t~ire a r~vi.cr~rl~;~ r~ ~t, •~ i„ _ _~ ,. ,t , r' - - , ~' The site elan has been revised to comely with SSC reauirements 7. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT In response to your request for comment on VAR-08-002, the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) Planning Review staff has reviewed the submitted application and site plan. It has been determined that there are no site specific requirements for you at this time due to the fact that: • This development will generate less than 10 vehicle trips per day (VTD). If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACRD Planning Review will review the site plan and may require improvements to the transportation system at that time. • Prior to final approval you will need to submit construction plans to the ACRD Development Review Department to insure compliance with the conditions identified above or for traffic impact fee assessment. This is a separate review process that requires direct plans submittal to the Development Review staff at the Highway District. • A traffic impact fee maybe assessed by ACRD and will be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Contact ACRD Planning & Development Services at 387-6170 for information regarding impact fees. 7.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval 7.1.1 Comply with requirements of ITD and City of Meridian for the Eagle Road (SH-55) frontage. Submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding said requirements prior to District approval of the fmal plat or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Contact the District III Traffic Engineer at 334-8340. 7.1.2 In the right-of--way to be provided by the development to the south, construct the portion of River Valley Street abutting the site's, south property line as a half street section with a minimum 24- feet of pavement, vertical curb and gutter on the north side, and a 3-foot gravel shoulder with a barrow ditch on the south side of the roadway. 7.1.3 Dedicate a minimum of 40-feet ofright-of--way from the east property line out to Eagle Road for the construction of .River Valley Street prior to plans approval or issuance of a building permit. 7.1.4 Construct a 10-foot wide multiuse pathway along the south boundary of the site, inside a public sidewalk easement, north of and parallel to River Valley Street. Pipe the Stokesberry Lateral wherever it runs between the path and the River Valley Street right-of--way. If any portion of the Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 path lies within an irrigation easement, the sidewalk easement shall be recorded prior to the irrigation easement. 7.1.5 In the right-of--way to be provided by the development to the south, construct the portion of River Valley Street between the site's southwest corner and Eagle Road as an off-site street improvement, with a minimum of 24-feet of pavement and minimum 3-foot gravel shoulders and borrow ditches on either side. 7.1.6 Provide ACRD with a road trust deposit for one-eighth of the cost of installing a traffic signal and full intersection improvements at Eagle Road /River Valley Street. 7.1.7 Construct Allys Avenue intersecting River Valley Street at the east property line as a complete collector street section with vertical curb, gutter, and 7-foot attached concrete sidewalk. Extend the section from River Valley Street to the south easement line of South Slough irrigation ditch. Dedicate 64-feet ofright-of--way containing the constructed portion of Allys Avenue by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of--way dedication after receipt of all requested material. 7.1.8 Construct an emergency access on Allys Avenue approximately 140-feet north of River Valley Road. Install a restrictive device to allow emergency access only (i.e. gates, bollards, etc.) to be approved by the Fire Department 7.1.9 To accommodate the extension of Allys Avenue across the South Slough irrigation ditch, either: a. Provide ACRD with a road trust deposit for one-half of the cost of constructing the crossing of the South Slough irrigation ditch at the northern terminus of Ally's Avenue, or b. Construct a bridge over South Slough and extend Ally's Avenue as a full collector street section to the north bank. One-half the cost of the bridge construction may be used to offset the road trust deposit required in condition 6 for the signalization of the Eagle Road/River Valley Street intersection. 7.1.10 Locate the western driveway on River Valley Street no closer than 500-feet east the centerline of Eagle Road. Construct it as a curb return with minimum 15-foot radii, 46-feet wide (back-of curb to back-of--curb) with a center island, and paved its entire width and at least 30-feet into the site 7.1.11 Locate the eastern driveway on River Valley Street no closer than 175-feet from the western driveway or the intersection of Allys Avenue (near-edge to near-edge). Construct it as a curb return with minimum 15-foot radii, to be no greater than 36-feet wide (back-of curb to back-of- curb), and paved its entire width and at least 30-feet into the site. 7.1.12 Coordinate all germane design and timeline functions with ITD, ACRD, the adjacent property owners, and Meridian City concerning the connection and alignment of River Valley Street to Eagle Road. 7.1.13 Provide access (and all necessary easements) to all adjacent parcels with frontage on Eagle Road to ensure them future access onto River Valley Street through the site. 7.1.14 Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. 7.2 Standard Conditions of Approval 7.2.1 Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of--way. 7.2.2 Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within any ACRD roadway or right-of--way. Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 7.2.3 All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 7.2.4 Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that maybe damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 7.2.5 Comply with the District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy. 7.2.6 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 7.2.7 All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 7.2.8 The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 7.2.9 Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7.2.10 Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #200, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 7.2.11 It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact ACRD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 7.2.12 No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 7.2.13 Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Tl, T,7 1.,. T "~v~iAi~ ~BY1~rl'iriPnt~aahmi.~+ ,7 1~+ -ri~ciaiocR r + ~1.. !'~•+. ,a ~ ,a L' t_ 'fc ~nno r ' ' ~ , rt. 1 ,+ •a ,t „+., a ~P~}flings-tom this-~nnlir~t Y ,.ra..,...__i:___.~- --- -----''- r QLT G / 4 h 1 ~ i } + k G ~,,,.le D,.,, + et~x~~r-~n+ r a t Yl t a it cn r ~ a ,7\ 1. b, + L,1 ,7 +'1 + i - t, +1, Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 C. Legal Descriptions & Exhibit Maps 1. Proposed Annexation Area » ~ ~TAPriF'~LU~ INS. Pflfl'SS1QNe4L 1r'1VGlIV~~tS, LArYl1 St1$YEYLtRS & I' 3tA ~iaaotin Sir ~a~ae~ty tD~oti36Q~ FOIL: Each guilders Jt~B 1V(l.: NY1205 DATE; April l8, 2(1~ ,~.~! iJ~s~R+ 1~~T~®1~ p'RUPEA'PY DESC.fitiPTT41V I)ETRRI~TC~t t3Y tliEC©RiI DATA FAx: i1~ 45A-68?+j ~ewa91: d6~txtcey~msctzg,as A parcel of land being; a pertion ofthe SW 1/41+1VV t/4 of Secgon 4, Township 3 North, Range l t,l3aisc Meridiart~ City of Meridian, Ada Cody Idaho, as shower on that eertai~ Record of Sun,~ey No. G~38, recorded as Instaument No, 10~4124{4l 8 on Sept Z8, 2t}Q4 in the f3ffice of the Remordea of Ada County, idairo, by Andemon Survey Group, Inc. for Brian Weiss, more particvlerly described as folle»vs: - gat the NVJ gamer of said SW i d4 NV4' 114, {North 1 /i 6 corner corerenon t4 sections ~ food Sj, said comer mars S. t1Q° 36' t]4" W., a dist2mc~ of 121.17 feel from the NVl/ corner ofsgid 5c3ction 4; Thence S. QO° 36' 11" fN., a disteotce of ?'76.26 feet, (foanrdy South,, alor~ fire westerly boundary of said S~ 104 ltiT®V 1I4 to the Pt7-T1V~° bp' REGI1VAi~NG; Thence S. 89° 23' 49'° E., n distance of 70.(iil feet, (fer~erly }, tta a point an the easterly bo ofthatcertain t,Marrr~y ]k~ed girded ~ ~ i No.9S#118~k3~1 let the CIS of the Reeordet of Ada County, Idaho, said poirnt monumeatcd with a found S/8 inrb diarrteter iron pin atsrk~d "A5G PLS '7314"; Thenos along the bound~yr of said Record of Survey No. 6638 the following courses and dish: Thence continuing S. 89° 23' 49" E., a di~anee of 230.130 feet, (formerly East), to a found 518 inch diameter Tram pin taao~ksd "ASG 1~ 7314m; 111.00° ~' 11 ~ E., a distance Qf Z18.438 feet, (formerly Nartb 2i8.OS feet), to a ptsint on fihe southerly bc~dary of than certain off=leeits", Cam No. SP IE #i31'1t152~M, recr~rd~ ~ cet No. 104047079 to tlYe Qi~ee ®ft)te lterorder of Ada County, klahfl, ward point witnesd S. 00° 36' 11" Rm., a uf40.00 fleet with a found 518 inr.h iron pin 'ktxl "ASGPLS 7314", continuing along the boundary of said Rerxsrd of Survey No. 6638 said elo~ the ~e0-erly boundary of said t Mo,104047079 the following courses and distanees: Tlte~ N. 84° 26' i 1"E., a distance of 17.43 feet, (fornmerly N. 83° 50'E.) to a point; Exhibit C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~, 3 ~~ ~ a 4 ~~ E . # i ( i t ,~ ,~ s G~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~-~;i ~ ' ' ~ !, ~ ;~ ~ ~~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ;j ~ ~ t i s ~ r a ; ~ ~ ~ ~, j ,; I. ~ . } . ~ ~ ~ '~ T f ( . r r 3 , ~ , ~. i ~'.C jl Z I ~~ ~ `~ ~ ~y; { k _ ~ ' y~y Nei i [ ' k+. I ~[ ~ ,: 1 [ f. F ~,' J R, 7 F Sit ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ L ~ ' ' r ~ ~ 1 # r ~ ~ ~ ~' I ~ ,~ ~ ~ kl ~ t. ! f 9 ~, a ;y R ~ i ill ~ ~ ~; ~ S r- 1 r. _~ ~ : ~ ~ ~; et f ; ~ 1- ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNI~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 IFiA..SON aYa STAI-FJkY..ts ilvt°» P~7'4AG ~' I AhD c~`G~/@'4~,'y~py' & PI'.9147PF.J4S H t3ra~ld~rs.l.2utti 1~~rnity-7+iVI205tSurv~.y~le~alslRevis~.cl,4~~~.d '1'hetlce S. 6G° 18' 49" ~., a distance of 264,013 feet,{forer~erly S. 6b° 55'E.r, tit a pr~rnt, said 13Q117i referenced S. 45° 26' l 1" Vb'., a distance of 30,Ott feet with a fecund 5~'8 inch dimneter irgrl pia narked "ASG PLS 7314"; 7~tten~e S. 34° 48' 4'9" L., a distance of 227.70 fo~i,~form~ly S. 35° 25'E.), to a pr~iII,t, said mint refneed 3. t36° aa' 1 ~" W., a distarce of 11.50 feet with a found 5fF inch dihmeter iron pen marked "AStJ PL w ?3l4"i Theme S. 71 ° 16' a9" E., a distane~ of 132.00 feet,(forrnerly S, 7l ° 55'E. }, to a found 5/8 inch diameter ire~n pin marked "ASC PLS 7314";. Thence S. 8S° 33' 49" E., a distance of 174,90 feet,(fomser2~+ S. 86° 10'x.), to a point, said Fob referenced S, 27° a2' 23" QV., a distance of 30.00 feet ewith a found Sl'B inch er 'von pin marled "AS~Cs PI,S 7314", Thence S. a0° 43' as" >~." a distance of364.98 feat, (fcsrly S. 4l ° 20"E,, a distscace of 3bb.30 feet, to a found Sf8 inch diameter ire~n pier marked "ASG PLS 731a"; Theaace 5. 72° 58" 4eJ" E., a distance of 99.9 feet,{formerly S. 73° 35'la., a dista~ree of 98.34 feet), is a ptoint on the easterly txx~undat~ of said S'W 114 NR~ I/4, said pt-i_r~t witnessed S. Ot3° 40'18" W,, a distane~ of 2.0.0(1 fc~t 7th a found SI8 mch diameter iran pin marked `~ASG PLS 7'314"; Thence leaving the s®utherly b© of said Ain. i 04(I47t~'9 and +crentinuir~ aton8 the k~undaty ssf said Rrd c-f Smvey Alo. 6638,. S. 00° 40'48 W., a distance of 111.65 feet,{thy}~ South a of I l2.$~G fe~t~, alum the erly bo~rndery vfsaid SW I,~4 N'W If4 to the SE cnrBer ofsaid SW ll4 NW 114, (tenter west 1f16 corner), skid corner ffionumented with a f®dnd 5~8 inch diameter irem pin marked "PAT P1.S 434'd"; N. 89° a5' 21" Vd,, a of 978,x.7 f~t,(fesrmerly 1~4'esi a distance of 979.2a feet)" ales the southerly boundary caf saaid SV3 IJ41rIW I/4 to a found Sf$ inch diameter iron pia mark "C3 PLS ?314" which S. 899 45' 2I" E., a distance of 3St1,00 feet froffi the S'W corner of sand SW I/4 IV4V 1/4,~ 1l4 corer co3o~mon tc- saeti®ns 4 a 5~; N. 00° 36' 1 I" E., a distance of 180.{311 feet, (ferra~erly North}, tta a found 318 inch diameter iron pin marked "ASG PLS 731"; T'hene~ N. 89° 45' 21'' W~ a distaance of 49.6 ft,(fctrraerly We~z}, tea a point an the easterly bonnd~ry of that certain W`arrant~r d3eed as No. 774180fi in the Cal=pace of the Rec+nrdes of Ada Gounty, Tda1-o, said mint ~numented with a found 5f8 inch di~nteter iron pin marked "AS{3 PLS 7314"; N. 00° 3G' 11" ~., a distances Qf 145.00 feet„ (furmeriy North1, alermg the easterly botnadary of mid ent No. 7741846 to a point, said paint vvtrtessed S. 90'° 36" l 1" W," a ®f 1.0Q foot with a found 5/8 inch dia4nete~ irttn pin. marked "ASG PLS 7314"; Exhibit C CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 &i 'ate' y & ~3',n.~1~LD t++C. f'R®FsIO,~e9L E~ts~v~{~.,~ ~g St9eB~iY®~, ~& P'a~t 3 at3 ganders, Nu1u!#o l~~mi7v N67120~SurveyUlh~visrd e4~mit°ae.d~e Tite~e N. II9° 4S' 2I" V4'.~ a distance cif 23@, i~ feet,{formerly VVAest) along the ttartherly tiaundary oI's~d instraenent ~:h_ 7?4I ~fJb to a pagnt can the.easteriy l~undary of that ~tid ~arreniy Did InJJ~~s((tR~rf~u~emg~e~7n(~t1Nj~ja. 9501 X4344 said point rrac~nted with n found 5A$ ~ d~meter loan pin cnarited y R"k t3V 7"1sL'1 1.7~~~9 ?banes r~ntinuirt~ N. ~~ 45' 2I" 1tI., a disteate~ of 74.t~ feet, alar~g the extension of said nerkherly haugdmy to a point an the wr+esterrty bc~ru-idary nf~id SVIe 1/4 N~ ld~~ 7`hence 1V. ®4~ 36' l l" ~., m dist€u~ce of 2I 1;.94 feet aloAp the erly boundary of said U4'aty Geed Ina°trumeni No.9S~I X434 to the Pfl1IV'1° cil~ ~~+~1'~TING. This ~cel eontains l `x.46 a~e~ rnorz r~r less. All accrardin~ tg the r~ctard of surbey as re~nd~ in the 8f~ice 9f the Ada Cc-~ty l~Cnrder. ~iTB,T~~C°I° T+CI-: All existing rights of v~~ay and ~sernent~ of reeord ar iiuplied apping on the ab~rv+e-~ctesc~ibed of lid. This i.e~al flan was written wvitl~ut the benefit +~f ffi dual boundary aurvep. The sh©wn llerean wem pre,~ed ~m tlsat eertain Qf Surve}= for `~63~"~, ~teeord~i sus I amt Nco. °` 1441 ~44I 8'" isz the Atli of flu; Recorder caf Ada Gourrty, Idaho. ~~ ~ 25 ~z~~ Exhibit C k F ~ ~; ;i t ' ~~ i 1 } ~ I E ~ .i j ~ ~ {, 6 ~ ~ t '~ `~ ~ . ~ t r ' . i 1~ ~ ~~ ` i j:.~ .~~ , t ~ ~ :9 ,f E: I ; ): ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ' , , ,.~ ~ d , r . 1 ~ 1 S f i , + i pp 1: E L tJ ~ ~A ~ ., flit ' ~ ' 4 ~ '~ ' I; i ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~: ~ f ~~ # ~ 1 ~~ I F ;. ~:., f. ~~ Z C t s r ~ ~l ~ S ' i • ~ ~! . ~: ~ , ~i ~ ` ~ , ~~ , ~ „ ~~ ,; ~: r , CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNII~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 3~ 33 ~ Y.~~Ti~: FiC~~r " ~. ~ =al .a ~. .`°, W~ ~ ~ ag € +~ ems: a~ t~a°a S,~a ~ rte 1-~ d . L .~'A~.E _ . ~ ~7 s.~_ 1 ~Er, ~ Cdr . m" L : ~~i"4g"E 7~ ~9 42 r4a'~°E+'13"ad . _ Sob ^ 4 C6°~« t3 - _ S~fa'~+s'I~ +W Illy ~u (u~ >~' ~'~51P1 OF =~ ~ L I ~ ~~t?aih4~,~~ '`~ " / 23d:?' 1 ~ , . >- .e a tri ~a a 4a ~ 1 t~~'aa'~1^w ,~ .-, ~~~ ~a , ~ ~ ~° .. ~ ~~ l g ~ ~ 7$ "~t$ `* ~~dEw ~ B1f T~ ~~t'~r; ~'°-E~IU' gy14AN PU~I.IC V4"~f~KS UgpT. `~ 6Gb7E~V ~ ~~ brims ~ rr~ n~ od ~fS u4ch ~~. ~!t~n Vii'" ~l~Y~'~% ~mC "~S~ ELK ~vi~#", ;aNF~s~ rath=rw;r~ t +~ ~Ir`~es~5~ ~~~ rRaf~rer~C~ t~2ru,:r,e*z! _ _ ~_m,. _ _ _ ~rt7~ert~+ rt~y dt*vt' - _ _ ~ ~ _ ~ yr~ fr~rr~ l Exhibit C ~_ ~. ~ ~ ~ .~ 11~~ 1 i f ~ . ~ ~~ ` +(( ~ I ~~ o; I~ 4 { ~ ~ z , ~ ri ,,, I, ~ ~ fi ~y'= ~ ~k ti~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ r ~ j { ~ ~ x ~ ~ k p 1 'r~ ,~ f "gypp 66 - ~~ ~ ' r ~ t ~ 4~~ ''` ~;; ~~, ~ ~' ~ 1 ; r' ee c. , i i pp ~ ~ ~ y ' ~ ? ~ ~~ A I ~ ~ S M 4 ` '-~ i f 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 'r r ~ ! 1, ~ 1 ! ~ ~ 1 y~ f..' t:~ ~4, . : S ~ N 1. Yy, ~ :~ 3r I 5 ~. ~ y ~. _ Y ~ r ri. ,~ §: ~: t E ~ ~ ~{ S` 1 R t ji{ 1 7 [ ~`-~ ~ I ~. i yr 3 '. j } ~. ~ ~, E,` ,~ ~` tt t 5 f ` i 1 I ~~ ~ 1 ,~ a~g`l ~ tamer ----~ ~~~ ~ «rsamw.rnaa€ta CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 2. Proposed C-C Boundary ~ `. ~~ ~® ~ Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors and Planners 314 Badiola St. Caldwell, ID 83605 ~~ ~ ~~' ~ fnc. Ph (208) 454-0256 Fax (208) 454-0979 e-mail: dholzheynomseng.us FOR: Bach Builders JOBNO.: NV1205 DATE: June 8, 2006 ANNEXATION PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1 A parcel of land being a portion of the SRT 1/4 N~V 1/4 of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho, as shown on that certain Record of Survey No. 6538, recorded as Instrument No.104124018 on Sept 28, 2004 in the Office of the Recorder of Ada County, Idaho, by Anderson Survey Group, Inc, for Brian Weiss, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the SW comer of said SWl/4 NMl/4, (9V1/4 corner of Section 4), said corner monumented with a brass dish Thence N. 00° 36' 08" E. a distance of 543.94 feet along the westerly boundary of said SWl/4 NWl/4 to the POINT OF BEGINNING,; Thence S. 89° 23' S2" E. a distance of 70.00 feet perpendicular to said westerly bo~dary to a point monumented with a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence continuing S. 89° 23' S2" E. a distance of 230.00 feet to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence S. 00° 33' S4" Vd. a distance of 217.06 feet to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence, N. 89° 45' 23" W. a distance of 230.15 feet parallel with the southerly boundary of said SWl/4 NVdl/4 to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence, N. 89° 45' 23" Viz. a distance of 70.00 feet parallel with the southerly boundary of said SWl/4 NW 1/4 to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; Thence N. 00° 36' 11" E a distance of 218.94 fcet parallel with the westerly boundary of said SWl/4 NWl/4 to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel comains 1.50 acres more or less. ~~. ~ Pal ~ su1t1~ ~ all easements andrights-of--way of record or implied. Exhibit C }~ i ;~ : .~> } t. 4 1 ~.1 .~ ,~$'~ p3 ~~; ~ 4 N~ ~{~~55• j~ ,S~ 4 ~. ~R' .j Fes` Ci y~~ ri •~ J g' :_; t h S~:M H S f .y Y ~Ty + ~5 V~ 8 (! 0 6 ~ i i_ k S CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 ~~~r~ ~_ s~ ~ a 1 "; PCiIt~dT ;~- i ~ ^1" ,~• _-[ [[ W !;IJ ~ f _ 4a, J 1 FF I (~_3 ~ _ _ ~ ~ _ W t°~ ( : & a '~. ^J ~'~ 1 13_I •. T ~ ~,f~l ray l I r 1. P~ i I ~`' '' I C i ~~ 1 F, CJ~,iil'a'~'ila 1 ,~ f' J I ~ _ 1 ~: ~ -Inrn'~ iF. t FJ ~ (~r~ ~ _ ~~-~a~ ~ ~' ___ ~ 11irJ ~ a ~ ~ :31w ~- a(1 , _ ~ l5 731-1 ~If. :r ~ ti (1 1 ~ ~FE Tluk9_~ +~ ~ ._ _ if LIV'~£ _ ~ARPt3~ Gh-~TP°{~E _8345~4"E iu.CG• ~ 1 _._ _ ~ ~ I P ^ 1 . tl •g~ L~ 'z'_,ji ~~ f.Ss ~.'~ 7334 1 I I _ f_ _ _ -- nJ 1+I ~ryr ° . a k ); Li 731-0 ~idF7' CiV/• ' °~~ P~ ,x~ w~. dllM`~A~D _... ,®_ ~p.,,..pp,,~~,,~~ e+RU~rtwrw'ay ~ ~JBfJ Yk B L7bY.. ,K2 __ _ . ~} - ~:a~1~~ C. l.t~°IIFI~'~ 1+.~,,'eSN~dr91t~+&lt~d ~~d&Yfi~Fa~ASt~99 ra°iY~~: ,,, - Exhibit C ~ ~j ~ ~. ~ ~I ~' ? I ~ FI ~ ~- tB ~ ~ SI s ~ , ! ~ I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ HHqq ~ -:~ J t i r ~ ~ ! I ' I ~.I 3 I~ ~' I I ~ f .O! ~~ ~,,..< }; I y J ~~'~ ~~ it ~~'~ - k { S, 1~ 1 ~~~ _. CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 3. Proposed R-40 Boundary C~~~~ ~, ProfessianuJ Engin~rs, Land Surveyors and faPartners '~ 314 EladittPa St. Caldweti, ID B36tJ5 ~c'~ ~7~1 ~:~ Cr« RI, t~aa} ~s4 Fax t~a~~ ~~4-0~~~ ~-mail: alhe~ z1,a~~er~~u~ PRAPERTY I.)ES~Rtp'I'1©~i @A1tCF,L Z ~•4v ~ parcel of lead ling a portian of t1~e SW 114 NW l14 of Sectien 4w Township 3 Nartb, Rs~Be 1 East, Haile Ir'Ieridiaa, pity of Meridimx„ Ada ~tY Naha, as shown as that certain Renard of Sunray Na, 6d38, recorded as Instrument Igo. 10412401$ as Sept. 2$, 2004 in the C)ffice of the Rider of Ada Camay, idahca, hY Asdersc-n Sitsrwey Cimup, Inc, far Brian Weiss, mc3re p~licularly dn"bed as fallaws: Comtnegciag at the SW comer of said SW 1/41VW1/4, f.W 114 carver of Secrioa 4), laic] career m®ausxented with n hrass disk, Thence S. 89° 45' 23 °' E. a clisiance of 350.01 feet to the POIl~i'I' QF REGIPVNT~IG, said point mo with a found Sf8-inch diameter iron pixy; Thence 1V. 00° 36' OR" E. a distance ®f 180.00 feet para11e1 with the westerly bauadary a~f'ss°:d SW 114 NW 114 to a found S/8-inch diaraetcr itc-n pink `Thence N. 89° 45' 23" W. a distan+~e of 49.86 feel P~llel w~h the southerly t~undary of sand S W 114 NW 114 to a fa~md S!&iraclt diameter itaa per; Thence 1•T. 00° 36' 08" E. a d' of 145.00 feet parallel with fire weste7ly lxxwsdary of said SW 114 N~Ad ; /4 w s fauad SS&inch diarrtet~r imn pia; N. 00° 33' S4" ~. a distance x#'217.06 feet to a !'awed 518-i~h diameter iraa pin; T1.00$ 36' 08" E, a distance of 218.08 feet parallel with the westerly baundary of said SW I/4 I~tW 114 to a goist thax falls in the South S1au8h; 'T`hence alos8 said South Slauglr the follawisg artd distances; Them Id. R4° 2b' 0$" E. a of 17.43 feet to a pointy Thence S. 66° 18' S2" E. a of 264.00 feet to a point; Thence S. 34° 48' S2" E. a distance mf 22?.70 feet to a Poixrt; Tlsertce S. 71 ° 1 fi' S2" E. s dim of 132.00 feet to a paiat~ Thence S. $5° 33' S2" E. a distance of 174.90 feet to s point; 7'heace S. 40° 43' S2" E. a disuse of 364.9>i feet to a Point; Exhibit C ~~~' ~ ~ rl ~i ~. i' fly.' I a s. : ' I - ~, ~ ~,~ y ~ ,' ~ ~ t ;, ` i i p' E ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ?~ ~ t i { t ~ ~ t ~ 1~ ~ ~ t I 4 ~ 3~ ~ ~ G I ,~ '~ ` ~ t' ~,<< ~ i ~ 1 Z ~ ~ . ~ i ~ ~ , ~ } r ~'~ 1 ' f- ~_ ~ :~i 3 , ~ t ~ 1 ~ ~~ .. ~ f~ t f-~~ - ~P~~I i Y CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNI~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEA~i DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 'i'hi~ ~tr~el coni4ins 10.56 acs m~ car Tess. ih~s p~€1 i~ subj~t to ~ efn~nt~ d riffs-o~~ y ~f Ord orsffiplied. Exhibit C i ~: ` ~' C ~ ' , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T ' ~ ~ ';~ E; I r ~ ~~. ~ ;~ ,~_~ !~ , ~ ~ ' ~ i ~i' ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ t y ~ ~ i ~ I ~ 1~;y j ~' ~ ~ t ~ ~ [ t 1, ~ k ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ 9 1 9 ~ ~ _ ~'~ ~ 1 i _ i ' ~ ~ 3 fib. ~' 1 1 t ~ i ~ ` ~ ~{ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : i ,j „ ' f f f, ~ f~.,,3 l ~:t , ` f ` ~ r I ~ ~ I ~ S.~. ; , ~°1 ~ ` i s, ~ , ~~ i~ i. ~ ,~ i a .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f; ~~;; ti ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~' i i' ~ '~ ~':,~ a; ~ ` ~r ~ E~'; {. ~ f ~ I iii .. ~ '. ~.'` CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 +~ a+ w u;~rtar P i 8 _' _. i`w~ I _ !' 1 b ~ L ~ -~ ~~~ _ ~r T ~....~.. `. _ c-.`.._ Mav xuY.s'y~.~ B:an° ~cc vas NA3'%0.'Se3`M '~""_ ~°_ - o. _ - ~ --- - -- ~ -`-- _'tdY*,~r- C ~' C~a~a1s ro. PAJIf11 7 AE'01`}J a,~ es aao ~ ~. ., `4 - , r '~ tt w.s , m u1 4J1~ t~~.3r~£ ' - ~ =' . r _ - ~'~ .sa is ~. ~ `°- }°- _.~ _~_- - _FiPU'T'L(zFGRi~i~IYS?t. ~ --._ _- - ---_ _-...-.-----__ __---_ _ _~ . ,+.p ~e '. Id eLS ¢} - ~aT-~9 ~ ~ ~r ~«~ II ~ 'S d e,c Ci 1 o ~~';~. ~: w ,a as ~, a. ~.~~ a `F ~~ ~ ~~ ~ .. ~` ~ ~ 4 u ~ 9y, , NI ;~ Exhibit C CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAI~i DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code 1. Annexation & Zoning Findings: Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone, the Council shall make the following findings: a. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The applicant is proposing to annex and zone the eastern 10.56 acre portion of the property R-40 and the western 1.5 acre portion of the properly adjacent to Eagle Road, C- C. The City Council finds that the proposed zoning map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. ne ~~=e,•er~taf€~ees~e~t ..«~~....+:~....~+wo , ~ ".~e ,,,,..~;.....,. r• r• :...._____.~_~_ _...,___ ~.__-- (see Analysis, Section 10 of this report for more information). Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals, Section 8, of the Staff Report. b. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds that future development of the residential portion of this property will comply with the established regulations and purpose statement of the R-40 zone and future development of the C-C portion will comply with the purpose statement of the commercial districts. c. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds that the proposed zoning map amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. Staff recommends that the Commission and Council rely on any oral or written testimony that may be provided when determining this fmding. d. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited to, school districts; and, The City Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment should not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. e. The annexation is in the best of interest of the City (UDC 11-5B-3.E). The City Council finds that the annexation of the 10.56 acre portion of this property with an R-40 zoning designation and the 1.5 acre portion of this property with a C- C zoning designation is in the best interest of the City. c~.,.rr a,.°° --.,..c ~~ *,. * *,, ~ ~ ,~ pr.. Y....~:,. ,.f ai... Y ..~.. a ~ i. a n ~+ ~L L r 2. Conditional Use Permit Findings: The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed conditional use in terms of the following, and may approve a conditional use permit if they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to Exhibit D ~~ ~ i~ ~ , IC t~ Y Y ~ t ~ ~ f ~ L ~~ i f 1 ~ ~', } j , t. i } { ~ t j ~ ~! . ~~ ~ ~ c: j~ ;C ~ ~ t 3y ~,, ~ g i ~. ~9 ~ j~ Y S~ i~ ~ '1 ii ~ { j ~7 hx 1 tt t: t ~ ~ ~~ t j; !Ak i F 1 S " 1. ~ {( i~' 3{ i ~ k ~ t E 1 i S 7 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~PARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 establish: a. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. The City Council finds that if the site is designed according to the conditions of approval in Exhibit B, the site will be large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet the dimensional and development regulations of the R-40 district and the multi-family Specific Use Standards. Note: The applicant is requesting a variance to the covered parking standards in UDC 11-3C-6. However, Staff believes that if a structure(s) is removed, the applicant will be able to comply with the required parking standards. b. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accord with the requirements of this Title. The City Council finds that the proposed multi-family residential use in the proposed R- 40 zone will be harmonious with and meet the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. c. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. The City Council finds that the proposed multi-family development is compatible with other uses in the general area and will not adversely change the character of the area. d. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. The City Council finds that the proposed development should not adversely affect other property in the vicinity if the applicant complies with all conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B of this staff report and constructs all improvements and operates the use in accordance with the UDC standards. e. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. The City Council fords that sanitary sewer, domestic water and irrigation can be made available to the subject property. Please refer to comments prepared by the Public Works Department, Fire Department and other agencies. f. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. The City Council fords that the applicant will pay to extend the sanitary sewer and water mains into the site. No additional capital facility costs are expected from the City. The applicant and/or future property owners will be required to pay highway impact fees. g. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Exhibit D CITY OF MERIDIAN PLA1'JNINL~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 The City Council fmds that the proposed development will not involve uses that will create nuisances that would be detrimental to the general welfare of the surrounding area. Staff recognizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase with the approval of this development; however, Staff does not believe that the amount generated will be detrimental to the general welfare of the public. h. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. The City Council finds that the proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any natural feature(s) of maj or importance. Staff recommends that the Commission and Council reference any public testimony that may be presented to determine whether or not the proposed development may destroy or damage a natural or scenic feature(s) of major importance of which staff is unaware. n Y lii~FkhE~r Ct ~ff fin ~ Y Y ds kh k+ e- b 1 Y e + .~ to c .. ~ i > > ...1.... 1, a A• 1, i A a as r aL •a nt t:•....; +„+; ia a u a ` ~ si~e,~he~d~re;~ent eemplianEe~~~ oas-o:T cx~ pmc r c cgdcscr rsixcT rcia$ i~l~l l 3~-4 ~ ~ ~t'1 f ~FlP~l A~7PC k~] + + + + 1' '+ .~. ~ .r.+n .. w .~ L L ' L 1'' ~ °O BV~~ ~ d t l h 7 ~ TBVPr n;a r a ~~ rs anFe 4t~. + ij~~ s~ ~g o v cmcxxco er S~C vcoar C~S~12t7 -ai xc w cr ~663~t ~"'~,,,,~„+ Eti ~~S d6 ~PFe~Se 1 t ~ a + ~' ~ inarc^.:i.encsi+ ,7,.e~ +l,0 1;Lo1;t.,.,.,7 F+ -~ «FI;,, C~ ~geS ~6~ ~ + n«,t +L + +' t F •a a g s n"+" +t t e '° •,, i~- Wi 'g "' ~Et,- vc~Pt~e H#i~~ ~6~`taP~}}~ 1~}E, nPc'~l +ra~ S,3 ~Ply~-aa~ 4. Variance (VAR-08-002) Findings: a. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district; The City Council is supportive of the request for a variance for a reduction in the number of covered parking spaces required by UDC 11-3C-6 from 360 to 295. Further, City Council finds that granting a variance as requested would not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district for multi-family uses. Exhibit D CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEAL DATE OF MAY 2Q 2008 b. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; Staff believes there are no topographical limitations or other physical characteristics of this lot which would prevent full compliance with UDC 11-6C-3B.4. c. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. The City Council fords that granting the variance should not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 5. Private Street Findings: a. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this Article• The applicant shall comply with the private street design standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4A and condition of approval #1.2.3 listed above in Ezhibit B of this staff report. b. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons property, or uses in the vicinity and If the Applicant complies with the conditions listed in Ezhibit B of this staff report pertaining to private streets, Staff does not anticipate any hazard, nuisance or other detriment from the private streets if they are designed and constructed as required by UDC 11-3F-4. c. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and/or the regional transportation plan. Staff finds that the use and location of the proposed private streets do not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and/or the regional transportation plan Exhibit D fl ~, a ~i ~` `s ~' ~;;c ~: ~,~~ ~~ ~~, '~ ~ ~.i 9 ~' ' . .' `~ +; i r ~ t, ~; t ~,~ '~ yy; i i {' Jk~f i S I 1~ I . .~ V [~. }' l (~ ~~ ~I'~ V ~ J ;~ ~ ~, s ~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~~ r ,~ { i~, ; , r ~~ ~' i June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 VAR 08-004 APPLICANT Kinsan Chan ITEM NO. 5-E REQUEST Findings for Approval -Request for a Variance to the UDC which prohibits new approaches directly accessing a state highway to allow a temporary access to SH 55 /Eagle Rd for Great Wall Restaurant AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: COMMENTS See attached Findings ~-~prov~ OTHER: Contacted: ~~~~ R I Date: ~Q - I I. Q Phone: Emailed: ~ r Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. i i~ I~ i 7 GGG"' , 3 i ~ p '~ '~; t i ~~~~ ( ~ 's ~ .~ u~ i t,~,3 ~ F ~ i fS tt {{ 4 }~ ~ 4 ~ F ~i~. 1 ~ Qk' 0 ~{ ~ ~~ 1l •~ ~ ~ s f{f{his ~ ~ S I; _~ ~ ~ , ~ i ~., l ht€ 7) I ~~~ ~' ~ ~1 ~. 7 i t. 1. C.. ( ~ yy~{~?i i. [[app, ~ 7 ~! }. ~ ~ ~ ~ ! I f f i ~ &Vii. t k" ~ S. ~ ~; ~~ly ~'. 'i~ q ~. is ~ r1 ~i. ~ f. ~ c ~ I ; " e CITY OF MERIDIAN E IDIAN~~ FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ~ DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of Request for a Variance from UDC 11-3H-4B.2.a, which prohibits new approaches directly accessing a state highway, to allow a temporary access to SH 55/Eagle Road for the Great Wall Restaurant, by Kinsan Chan. Case No(s). VAR-08-004 For the City Council Hearing Dates of: May 6 and 20, and June 3, 2008 (Findings on the June 17, 2008 City Council agenda) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-SA. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). VAR-08-004 -I- ~~ ,!' i ~ r ~i '~ : ~: ,3 r 1 i:{ i'i '~% ~~ t' i~ t .~: ,i,i. ~: b @!~' ~'. ,. ti!. a~ • 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, incorporated by reference. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-SA and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's Variance request for temporary access to SH 55/Eagle Road is hereby approved until such time as access is available to the site from either the north or the south. At such time, the temporary access to Eagle Road shall be removed and the street buffer landscaping adjacent to Eagle Road shall be completed. The applicant shall obtain an access permit from ITD prior to access being granted. D. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). VAR-08-004 -2- {~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~` ~I~ r~~'~ !~ ~ ~~' y~~ '; ~ f '. ~i . ~t !~~4 i~ V, !. I 4f ~~' ` ~`~ }~ ~ , `( ~ , ~~~ ~~ B action f the Ci Council at its re lar meetin held on the Y tY gu g day of (,tt'~-~- , 2008. COUNCIL MEMBER DAVID ZAREMBA VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD VOTED MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED '~- (TIE BREAKER) %~~~~~^ f `\~~~~~~'~ ~X~~~n Weerd .~` '~ '4ij, '~. Attest: ~~ C3' ~rR '- o SEAL Jaycee lman, City Clerk :,, ~~ `49 '~ Copy served upon Applicant, The P1a4ifiliig~~S~parhnent, Public Works Department and City Attorney. Bye Dated: (_,Q - Z.~ '~ City Clerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). VAR-08-004 -3- ~ ~ I ~ ~ _ • ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~€ r ~ ~ ' { ~ ~ ~ 7 } ~(3# +t.h { ~ i, y f 1St F + J ~ ~ p ~,.~ ~ . . ~ ~ t aft 1~~ r 3# ;, '. ~r 7f, t ~ ~ ~~~ tt FF~ y ~ 2' {S ~r f :~ ~ I s 4 . ~,.~ ~. i ( i i ti~ S ~ i. S l .~ . a ~, - s ~ -F ~ ~ C € a: X ~i } } .y~ ~ ~ fi : 4 8{:~ ~ s (S ~ ~ s T ' ~ ~ 1 ~~ I ~ ~. ~ .~ ~ ~ ; ~; ~ ~ ~ T , Z L ~ r' ~~ t~ ~ y S i+ 1 Q ~ '; ~. ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y F ~P 1 - } , ~ ~ y ? i 7 # ra. ~ ~ F'~ a , t' ~ F . , o- i -i ~. A. i ~ r i:~ ¢ ~ r `F~: k Ii ~~~ . r a 4 T ~:~~ ~ ' ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' Y tJ~ 1 ~ j ~ p rf ~ ~9 ~,fl' 7 p t + - ) ~ '~ ~i ~ ~ t ~k s ~ II ; y, ' }$ $ ; ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR HE~ DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 STAFF REPORT Hearing Date: May 20, 2008 (Continued from May 6, 2008) TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Sonya Wafters, Associate City Planner (208) 884-5533 SUBJECT: Great Wall Restaurant • VAR-08-004 E IDIAN-- ~1~ Request for a variance from UDC 11-3H-4B.2.a, which prohibits new approaches directly accessing a state highway, to allow a temporary access to SH 55/Eagle Road for the Great Wall Restaurant, by Kinsan Chan. 1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST The applicant, Kinsan Chan, is requesting approval of a variance to UDC 11-3H-4B.2.a, which prohibits new approaches directly accessing a state highway, to allow a temporary access to SH 55/Eagle Road for the Great Wall Restaurant. At such time as adjacent properties are developed and access can be provided from the south via the extension of E. River Valley Street at the half mile or from the north across the South Slough, the temporary access is proposed to end. The site is located at 2590 N. Eagle Road, on the east side of N. Eagle Road, approximately 2,000 feet south of the Usticlc/Eagle intersection. 2. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the request for temporary access to a state highway does not meet the findings criteria required in the UDC in order for the City Council to grant a variance (see Exhibit C for the required variance findings). Therefore, Staff is recommending denial of the subject Variance (VAR-08- 004) application for the reasons stated herein. he Meri ran itv oun it h and this item nn M.~v 6 ~...~ 7n 'wa i,,,,e ~ ~nnv ~ ~ ..~.,. earln~ on .ILIIQ .ZOOS. he OunC'1 aDDI'OV .d the ~•thiert VAi2 rnnnaet $. _ ummarv of City O ~nCll ~hli - Aaarina~ 1. In favor: Mike Fairchild il< In onnosition: None 11L Cowmen 'n~: None lY. Written testimony: Non y. tall nre entin ann ication: Anna .annin Yi. ther staff cowmen 'n on annli ation: Non IL ev I ue of Di ~c. ion by ouncil• 1. he fact that t i nronerty wa a n xed in o he itv fin 20041 prior o the adontio the UDC and enactor nt of ac cc re frictions o ate hi hwav 1L he nub iC afety i cne of a to 'n an aces no'n o A SS/FaQI Road (he Dotential for accidents when vehiClec are lowin down o tarn into he i an e site and merlin with traffic trave lino a hi b rate of need on be 111. ThQ Council directed the Planning ilanarFinant t0 COIIdlflOn fhe fnfilrP CiTP fnr this _ at anon the ezniration of his temnorarv aC Pss ne it (when a ec i >t>•ovided to the site from ei her he no h or he oL hl. he mnorarv a cess wo ~l be removed and the ctreet b offer landscan'n adiacen o~a~le Road wnnld he eted Failure to do o wo old nromn he 'nitration of r vocation of he i1P Great Wall Restaurant VAR PAGE 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNiN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR HE DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 ~, nnroval from ITD is reauired for the nrooosed temnorarv access to SH 55/Ea~le Road before access ma be granted ~. d . Kep Council Changes to Staff Recommendation ~. ounc'1 annroved the request for temnorarv access to Eagle Road until such time a access is available to the site from either the north or the south. At such time. the emnorarv access shall be removed and the required street buffer landscanin~ adjacent to F.agle Road shall be constructed. ii, access Hermit shall be obtained from I'TD prior to a temnorarv access being Qranted to SH 55/F,a le Road 3. PROPOSED MOTIONS Denial After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to deny File Number VAR-08-004 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 20, 2008, for the following reasons: (you should state specific reasons for denial.) Continuance After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to continue File Number VAR- 08-004 to the hearing date of (date certain) for the following reason(s): (you should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) OPTIONAL: I further move to direct Staff to prepare Findings and Conditions of approval for this project, to be considered at the (date certain) public hearing. 4. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS a. Site Address/Location: 2590 N. Eagle Road (Parcel #S1104233802) NW % of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 1 East b. Owner: Kinsan Chan 2064 S. Doe Creek Boise, ID 83709 c. Applicant: Same as owner d. Representative: Mike Fairchild, Architect e. Present Zoning: C-G; the property was annexed in 2004 (AZ-03-021, Ordinance #04-1103, Development Agreement Instrument #104129529) as part of the Redfeather Estates No. 2 annexation application. There was no concept plan approved with that application. f. Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Mixed Use -Regional g. Description of Applicant's Request: The applicant is requesting approval of a variance to UDC 11-3H-4B.2.a, which prohibits new approaches directly accessing a state highway, to allow a temporary access to SH 55/Eagle Road for the Great Wall Restaurant. h. Applicant's Statement/Justification: "This access is required to allow the owner to use his property. Without this temporary access, Great Wall cannot start development of this property. When surrounding properties are developed, this temporary access will be deleted and access will be as developed for surrounding properties." See Applicant's narrative for mote information. Great Wall Restaurant VAR PAGE 2 .: i _ [ ~ :..¢... N S~ .qp..I`: t: 'iii'. ~~ #` ~~i , ~ } T j k'~ s . } .: .-;. ? Sal :7 " } } 3 x: ; E ~ 3:$ ti ii' 1 'F t . e. , `>.r ~ ~': ~ e 33 , .~?vx' i:l ~. ~ ~~ i. r xx . 3 ( .~ c• - ~;: ~ : ! L ` ~ i`.-: 5 i } :lx .::s„ q~ •`t 3' ~~ .~ ~ xd....3 i~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~, k'~ ~~ ~ :i ~ ~~ a r { ~..a,. . kk ~ "i' ~. ~.ES• ' ~~'. }t} E:. rj t . a ~ ~„ ~ f .~ ~ . ~. {`: } ~:~ et `` sj o 414 t:..~ ~ . p. ~ _ J ) . !~ 'i: "~i ~.'<' 55555 '3 ~ S 3 yy ! _ . ~ ~ ~~` ~ Y ~ . ..... i ~ 3 ~. . ~., _ ..t :x : 'a . ~! = ~: s± Y ' . '~ . .,: . a . }. ([ sS ".~. lrr? a 1, . p. E } t }} .i~ 4:.i~ i. t ~# ` S; ~. ~ . `fi~. t ~'k pp Q [ yy zt. T'°~ !! 99 [~ f. i i !` j}.fir '.'IF '. _ ~: ~.:' R4'~' ~: 9' ::.'l S' :~ . ~•` ":1 9•' ~ ' ~ . * ' . ~.. ~.1~ ~ ~~1~ XE ~': p.: ! .~.~.. ~.d :~ ~. ': '~~ F Y fi' l' • , •' ~:~ e t ;~: s~ ~: . r 'rr c ~.. ~. ' ib } :. {1.. t: i r:_. ~'~ :, . ~ A :~'. '~ . 1 3 ~{. ~4'~$ ~ ~ . . ~... # . CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNIN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR HE DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 5. PROCESS FACTS a. The subject application will in fact constitute a Variance as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code Title 11 Chapter 5, a public hearing is required before the City Council on this matter. b. Newspaper notifications published on: April 14, 2008 and Apri128, 2008 c. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: April 11, 2008 d. Applicant posted notice on site by: May 9, 2008 6. LAND USE a. Existing Land Use(s): The property is currently vacant and contains the remnants of an old residence; the property is currently zoned C-G. b. Description of Character of Surrounding Area: The surrounding area consists of commercial property in the development process, offices, residences, and vacant property. c. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: 1. North: Single-family residence, zoned C-G and the South Slough 2. West: Single-family residences, zoned Rl (Ada County) and R-2, and office uses, zoned L-O 3. South: Vacant land, zoned RUT 4. East: Vacant land, zoned RUT (Ada County) and C-G d. History of Previous Actions: NA 7.UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE The following UDC section is pertinent to this application: • UDC 11-3H-4B: Access to State Highway 69, State Highway 55, and State Highway 20-26: 1. Use of existing approaches shall be allowed to continue provided that all of the following conditions are met: a. The existing use is lawful and properly permitted effective September 15, 2005. There is no existing use on the property; the property was previously residential property, however; the residence has been torn down and the property has been zoned commercially (C-G). b. The nature of the use does not change (for example a residential use to a commercial use). The applicant is proposing to change the previous use of this site from residential to commercial. c. The intensity of the use does not increase (for example an increase in the number of residential dwelling units or an increase in the square footage of commercial space). The intensity of the use on the site will increase significantly from residential to commercial property with a restaurant. 2. If an applicant proposes a change or increase in intensity of use, the owner shall develop or otherwise acquire access to a street other than the state highway. The use of the existing approach shall cease and the approach shall be abandoned and removed. a. No new approaches directly accessing a state highway shall be allowed. Because a new and higher intense use of the property is proposed, the use of the existing approach shall cease and the approach shall be removed. Great Wall Restaurant VAR PAGE 3 s , ~- ~ ~ , ` I . ~ 1 i ~ t . ~ ~ fit: + [ ~ Y q !-~ ~ ~ i I ~ `.~ i > i ~~ ~ i 1 ~ ~ E i ''~ 3 ffi j ~. ~' A i ~ i ~ ~ ~ 3 1 ~ i { ,. ~ 3 z ~ ! Y ~ i ~ ~ ~ ( 1 1 y/ i$' i Y'. 9 :31 ; ~ ~ .~ 1 7 . ~ ~~~' r ~ t ~ ,i: ~ ~ ~ ~s. j ~ ~ k 5~ k. ~~ F 1 ~' ! t ' ~ y t ~ I ; ~= i ll~ EI i~ ~' { f 1 + ~ 1 y ~: ~.' ~ t ~ i i .~ ~ i S X5)3 £ ! f ~ ~s;; ~ ~ , ~ ~ e }fir . ,~ ~: ~~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ j ,~ ~ ;: ~~~ f. ~ ~ ~,~ 3 , I I€€{( fk sy ~; i 1 ~' i I ! ~ ~. ~~ ~ i q ~ ~ i ', C .$ ~~ } j ~ xS i ~i 'Y 1e X~~ ~ ~ k'. E ~ is ~1 t f 1: ~~ ~ r y •~ ~ ~ 11 ~- {: ~ ' ~ ~: 5s f , i P 3 t >~ ~ i t' ~ . ~~. ! ~L 3vf CITY OF MERIDIAN PL~SEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR HEA~G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 b. Public street connections to the state highway shall only be allowed at: i. The section line road; and Public street section line connections to SH SS exist at E. Fairview Avenue and E. Ustick Road. ii. The half-mile mark between section line roads. These half-mile connecting streets shall be collector roads. East River Valley Street, currently classified as a local road, exists south of this site on the west side of SH SS at the half-mile mark between section line roads. East River Malley Street will be extended on the east side of SH SS with development of the properties to the south. At that time, the street classification will change from a local to a collector street. Eventually this site will take access via a frontage road or shared commercial access aisles from E. River Palley Street but until that time, the applicant is requesting approval of a temporary access to SH SS. 8. ANALYSIS a. Analysis Leading to Staff Recommendation Staff has provided analysis below regarding the proposed application. VARIANCE APPLICATION: The applicant is requesting a variance from 11-3H-4B, which prohibits direct access to a state highway, to allow for a temporary access to SH 55/Eagle Road for the Great Wall restaurant. At such time as access can be provided to the site, either from the south via a frontage road from the extension of E. River Valley Street, or from the north across the South Slough, use of the access would cease. This property was previously residential in nature but the house has since been torn down and the property has been zoned commercially (C-G). The site was previously accessed from SH 55/Eagle Road. However, per UDC 11-3H-4B, when the nature of the use changes, the existing approaches shall be discontinued. Because the use of the site has changed from residential to commercial, access is no longer allowed from the state highway; the owner of the site shall develop or otherwise acquire access to a street other than the state highway and the existing approach shall cease. Note: The applicant, Kinsan Chan, states that he does not know when the use of the property as a residence ceased; when he purchased the property two years ago, the house had already been torn down. The property was annexed and zoned C-G with the Redfeather Estates No. 2 application in 2004, prior to Mr. Chan purchasing the property. Currently, there is no other access available to this site as the adjacent properties have not yet developed. Access to River Valley Street to the south at the half mile (soon to be extended on the east side of SH 55) by this property is dependent on three other properties redeveloping and a frontage road being constructed to the subject property. Or, a bridge must be built across the South Slough for access from the north. Neither of these options is likely to occur in the very near future. For this reason, the applicant is requesting a temporary access to SH 55 until such time as an acceptable means of access is available. To grant a variance, the Council needs to make the following fmdings: 1. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district; 2. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; Great Wall Restaurant VAR PAGE 4 CITY OF MERIDIAN PLAEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR HEA~G DATE OF MAY 20, 2008 3. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. Staff believes that granting a variance would allow a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed for properties that are adjacent to a state highway. Staff finds that granting the subject variance would be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare and that the potential for accidents would increase significantly with vehicles slowing down to turn into the site and exiting the site and merging with traffic travelling at high rates of speed on the highway. Staff realizes that the dependence on adjacent properties to develop first to supply the access required by the UDC for this property does create an undue hardship for the applicant. However, Staff cannot support an access point that would affect the safety of the public. Further, in order to make the fmdings for approval of a variance, all three findings need to be met and Staff does not feel that they can be for the aforementioned reasons. Further, the proposed temporary access does not meet ITD standards for access to a state highway (see letter from I'I`D in Exhibit B.1). Therefore, Staff is recommending denial of the Variance application (see Exhibit C for required variance findings). b. Staff Recommendation: Based on the facts and findings provided in this report and on ITD's letter, Staff recommends denial of File Number VAR-08-004. The Meridian City .nnn it eard this item on Mav 6 and 20. and one . 2008. A he n ~b is hea 'n on one 3. 2008. _ e Council aunroved the ~bie VAR r .ales 8. EI~~ITS A. Drawings 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map 2. Conceptual Site Plan B. Agency/Department Comments 1. Idaho Transportation Department C. Required Findings from the Unified Development Code (Variance) Great Wall Restaurant VAR PAGE 5 k ~ ~ { E ji~~ ~ S ~ I i 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ; . ~ s1~" ~ ~; ~ t t ~ ; ~ R r a s 4 { g Y ~ T 't k -E11 ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1~~~ t 1 f : y ~ t f . ~ ~ ~ ~ , € ~ ~ ~ `` ~ ~~ ~ f ~ z k a ? t %I ~ 1 ail ~ ~ a a. ~ ~ 1 ` i I~ $ t ' - i. ~ ~ f 5 X ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ i { I~ i 1 1 V £ f T; y' I~ ( ~ t tr T~ $ t~ S / ~ t ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1.1' ` j " , ~ ~ ~ ~ t Y + ~f { ~ "• ~ E_~hi . ~. ffi ~ ~ ; ~ I, it ._ ~' ~ j; ~ •.. CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEENT STAFF REPORT FOR HEARING DATE OF I~ARY 27, 2007 A. Drawings 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map Exhibit A - 1 PAGE 6 CITY OF MERIDIAN PDEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR HEARING DA~F FEBRUARY 27, 2007 2. Conceptual Site Plan `~~' ~ ~ J_ - --- ro ~ ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ , ~ , i '~° ~ ~~-_ - a - ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ _ r 1 ~ ; ~~, ~ I' ' ~~ ~~ ~~ E~ ~ a ~ ~ e I ~ --'-!~- m oav u ; ~ III~~Io ~ ~ ~ + i ~ I j i Tr .~..., ~ I 4feiD1 aenral. rmmsm '+:w® ~~ Exhibit A - 2 ;, ~i ~. fi;~' ,~~ Lf ~ ~ 4! ~s !/I ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cy b ' 9 t fi ~ ~ ~ ; . ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~. ~ ~: - ~, ` ~ i 3 ~ ~ fi I .; ~ ~ ~ L ! ~ ~ ~ 5 ' ` ~ . j~ i ~ ~ t ,~ 1~ ,fix ~; f ~ ~ ~ ~~ g ~ ; ~ ~ ~ r ~~ ~ 9 , ~ ~ r~ : ~ ,E i ~ x ~ ~ j ~ R t ~ ~ ~ t. i CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANN~DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR HEARING DA~F FEBRUARY 27, 2007 B. Agency/Department Conditions 1. Idaho Transportation Department iLd~f® i@AI~tO 7RANSPOA?pT10N DEPARTRS~IT ~ * P.4. Box 9028 Boise, ID 93707-2E?29 t~8? 33e!'93Q0 ~ ~ ttd.i~t~.gav ~$ rArraa s~QPe April 1 Q7g 2Q~1$ City of Meridian Planning I3epaitment 660 E. Watertower Line .suite 202 ~lrleridian, Idaho 83642 FAX ~$-6854 Re: 1;®caticjn: 2590 Eagle Read Raute: SE155 A9P 13.75 Name. Kinsan Chan ~- Great Wall Restauraa# Case No. UAIt 0$-OQ4 Hcaring~ Dsite: May 6, 200$ Dear 7~ning Administrator, Access to Eagle Road should be at locations that comply ~Yth the ITD access poliL~~ rand the Eagie Road infi~tructvte Plan only. Any and all acmes points, and any other amc3nities such a~ landst~ping within the right ©f way, grill require a permit from iTi3. Access issues should be resolved as soon as possible 11rty r:vork done on the State Right of Way will require a penult. Permit applications are a~~ailable &cam this office. Please have the applicant contact lvlatt Ward at $ I S® Chiaden 131vd, II3714 in Boise or call (2011) 334- $341 tc~ trlitaiA a permit applieatian. if'you bade any questions please call xae at 334-$9[11. Sincerely, Phil Choate 5erric~r Planner Exhibit B I~~s .y ,~ 1~ 1 ~ ~~,~ If '~. i ~~''-~ ' Q~ ? i { E ~~ i ~~~°~ f r i~ ~~ l' ~' ~ S ~ ~I; t .)` f ~~ 1 E ~ S]~ I , ~~. z ~ i v. ~' 22 ~~~~ i f 3: 1~ s E I ' ~ i ti ~ i! I~ ~~ C I i ( 11 ~ 1 E I ~ ~ t i i ~- ~ ~ l 4 ~ ~ i. F: ~ ~. ~ f' i~ t t r, !: l~~~ ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANN~EPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR HEARING DA~F FEBRUARY 27, 2007 C: Required Findings from the Unified Development Code (Variance) The City Council shall apply the standards listed in Idaho Code 67-6516 and all the findings listed in Section 11-SB-4.E of the UDC to review the variance request. In order to grant a variance, the Council shall make the following findings: A. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district: Direct access to State Highway 55 is prohibited, per UDC 11-3H-4B. However, City Council finds that this property is unique in that it was annexed into the city in 2004 without a conceptual development plan with Redfeather Estates Subdivision No. 2, prior to adoption of the UDC and enactment of access restrictions to state highways. Currently, there is no other access available to this site as the adjacent properties have not yet developed. For these reasons, City Council fords that allowing a variance for temporary access would not grant a right or special privilege to the applicant that would not otherwise be allowed in the district. B. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; The City Council finds that the subject property is landlocked by undeveloped properties. For this reason, the applicant is not able to develop his property until surrounding properties are developed and access is provided from the north across the South Slough or from the south via a frontage road from the extension of E. River Valley Street. The City Council fords that the dependence on adjacent properties to develop first to supply the access required by the UDC for this property does create an undue hardship for the applicant. C. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare City Council finds that allowing a temporary access to State Highway 55 would be detrimental to the public health, safety, and/or welfare by increasing the potential for accidents with vehicles slowing down to turn into the site and exiting the site and merging with traffic travelling at high rates of speed on the highway. However, City Council recognizes that allowing a temporary access would allow the property owner to develop his property at this time and not be dependent on adjacent properties to develop first. For this reason, City Council is supportive of a temporary access to SH 55/Eagle Road that would be removed upon access being available to the site from either the north or the south. An access permit shall be obtained from ITD before access can be granted. Exhibit C ~~ ; ~I f ~~ I ~; f ~~ ~' i ~', `j i ~I F ~ I ~_' ~. ~ ''- ~ ~ 1 r f' ~ ~ ~ C~ I G ~ a ; ~i ~ . '' ~~~ '~~ .~ ~ ~ ~ '' ~ 1 , ; ~' ~'r i;, ~ ~~ ~, ~ ~ ' f ~ : ~ s ~~ F~ i r~ . i ~ ,' E a I ~ } ~ i~ S,~ , i ~ 6 i~ ~+ ~' , 3 t ~' ~ ~,. ~ i ~ ; ~ z ~ ; ;i ~~ it ~ ~ } 1 >- June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-F REQUEST Sewer Easement Agreement for Jayket's Subdivision by Treehaven AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: _ Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of AAeridian. C ~ j ~ I ,, ~ ~ ,'° ' T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ I{ ' ~ ~` u ~ F - Y '•5 S ~' ' ~ ~ L ! ~ ~~ ~' ` ~ t y, ' F ` e i ~ y ~ ~ ~` . F t ~ ~C; 1 ~; ~ ~ t : : ~ ~' i F R f~ CC s-, I ~ COMMENTS See attached ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~t i ~ 1} t I rt_ ~ F € ` , G' d ' ` .p i ~ c iu ~ ~ yk in ~ ~ ~~' n '~ ~ t ~ .~. t:{ i. ,~ ~ ~,, _~ :s >~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ 4 ~ ywy ~, 1 T E ~ ~ ~ f~~: I ~i ir~ 9~f ~ sl. r ~ < } [[ ~• S~~ ~ ~ r J ~~' ` :' s r. i; ~ ;I ~ ~ 54 E ~~ ~ ~ t I ~ ~ ' ~ !¢ d. ---~~~777 NS z ~ ` '~ ; f ~ ~~ ~ 1 J Vj 3 e'y ~ i t ~'' { ~ ~~` i~ t`:~ 1 ~~~, ~ 'a' ~ '',~ :' j q rF_. ~ t i s ~. ti ~ ~ ~; a ~ ~. i~ ~ ~ } ~kM1 FFF ~2 a~- -u T i @¢ a. 7 ~ y ~ , - ¢@yy ¢( y(( y ~ { ? ~ AOA COUNTY RECORDER J. 0 NAVARRO AMOUNT .00 5 ` ~ BOISE IDAHO 07102108 1~4 RECORDEO~REQUESr OF III I.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIlll1IIIIII City of Meridian 108076615 SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this~~D day o c1U0 between Treehaven, LLC an Idaho limited liability company whose current address is 3 38 S. Bown Way, Boise, ID 8370b, the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipeline from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of a sewer line over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a sanitary sewer line and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, 'that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed. there in violation of this easement. i i! i! Sewer Main Easement (4) ~4 ,~ r: i !t ~I ~ ! f ~~' ~ ~~ i ii { ~; ~ ~f: EASMT SWR MAIN g ~ t' ~ ~~ ~w.. ~' E~ ~~ ~~ #' a;,, ;~., f ;~ r ~' e ,; r L~ ~ s ti ~$ k Y =i • • THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the azea described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of--way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they aze lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: Treehaven, LLC ~ ~ Derick O'Neill, Manager STATE OF IDAHO } ss County of Ada ) On this ~i2 ~ '~ day of ~Al 20~ fore me, the undersigned, a Notary rublic in and for said State, persbnaliy appeared / v~c~ Q `/1/~/ ~ known or identified to me to be the Manager of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fist aboe~i;,yy~jtten. °e°°~ ~l ER 0~4 _ ~''o ,,~' ~4~0000 oeo®oo~~'i~ o° °~ (SEAL) ~ ~~ ~,oTaRI- ': ~.~ AU B LZC' :~ ••r,,i~~•~T °o~oeoe°ooP~O Sewer MSin Easement •,~''~~a~ F~"~°°°e~ (4) ~~ / OTARY ~JBLI ~ OR IDAHO Residing at: ~Di S~~ Z/J Commission Expires: U3' lU- Z!J 1 / EASMT SWR MAIN ` i j ~ i i ~ ~; s ' } T; ~ If L ; ~ ~ ~ I j ( i 1 ~ I ~ r { ~ ;;~ r III ~ ! ~L ` I ; ~, , ~ ~ 3 ~ I ~f ~~ I ~ ~ ~ f l r i F ~: '~ ,~' 9i . 1 `:i i y, ~ , 3 ~ ~E ~~ a 'ir „ , ~ , ~. ~ %`' ~~ ~ ^~ { '" ` 4 ~: C ~ ~ i ~ ` l ~~~ ! f~ 1 ~ ~ ~: ; ~ i i f ~ 5 t~ `~ I ~ ~ ' ~ i ~ ~ t ~'#~ t;~ ~;i ~ ~ l, 3r ' '/ r j ~ ' C f ~a ~ r • O~I 3 ,~ 5 c ~ ~ p ` l i 2 i i ' 1 ~~ i ~ ~ ,~ ~ , ~ 4 ~ ~ ' ~ a p ' ~- ~ : !' i L 1 ~ ~~ ~] l , ' 3 ' ii ~ r ~ ~ FJ 2 ; ~ e ~ E. l ~ f _ ~ _ ~y ~ e ~; j ~ a ~~ i tis i r` Y,; i ~ c ~ ~~ ' i ~ # S °{ i i ~~ c ~~ ? ~ ' ~ c • , ~~ C t S ~ S i ~' ~~ jj 1 I l ~ K ~~ F ~ 7 4 ~ { ~• ~ ' ~ • ~ 9 I .j r ~ } r . . 1 D a i ~ f F ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ri ! ~ ~ `~ r ?~. ~ : c 7 r Tammy de Jaycee Approved by Council on STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada, ) On this ~~~day of ~~ 11t=. ,20u° before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and Jaycee Holman, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Idaho and who subscribed their names to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN•WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my off~ciai seal the day and year first above written. •~••i•••r~• SEAL ~,; ;$~ _ ~•~' `~ ~i otary Pu lic or Idaho ~ ~ `~ i Residing at: ~~ a !~ • My Commission Expires: ICS-('-f 1 ~ • .• • . . .~ ..~ CITY OF MERIDIAN _~ • Project: 07002 Date: August 24, 2007 Page: 1 of 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN SANITARY SEWER AND UNITED WATER IDAHO EASEMENT A pazcel of land situated in the northeast % of the southeast I/4 of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particulazly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southeast corner of said Section 22, from which point, the south quarter corner of said section bears, N.89°17'35"W., 2647.29 feet; thence, along the east line of said section, A) N.00°20'38"E.,1734.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, 1) N.89°39'48"W., 236.71 feet; thence, 2) N.07°14'41"W., 6.32 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve; thence, 3) Northeasterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 331.50 feet, an arc length of 145.44 feet, through a eentral angle of 25°08' 17", and a chord bearing and distance of N.OS°19'28"E., 144.28 feet to a point of reverse curvature; thence, 4) Northeasterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 200.00 feet, an arc length of 54.89 feet, through a central angle of 15°43'26", and a chord bearing and distance of N.10°01'53"E., 54.71 feet; thence, non-tangent from said curve, 5) 5.86°f?4'02"E., 62.68 feet to the beginning of anon-tangent curve; thence, ~6) Southwesterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 262.50 feet, an arc length of 32.13 feet, through a central angle of 07°00'43, and a chord bearing and distance of 5.14°38'34"W., 32.11 feet; thence, tangent from said curve, 7) 5.18°08'56"W., 36.05 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve; thence, 8) Southwesterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 276.50 feet, an arc length of 105.97 feet, through a central angle of 21°57'30", and a chord bearing and distance of 5.07°10'11"W., 105.32 feet; thence, non-tangent from said curve, 9) S.89°39'47"E., 184.72 feet to a point on the easterly line of said section; thence, along said easterly line, 10) 5.00°20'38"W., 30.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL containing 0.39 acres, more or less. SUB3ECT TO, all Covenants, Rights, Rights-of--Way, Easements of Record, and other Encumbrances. ~: EXHIBIT "B" attached, and by this reference made a part hereof c:vxa~o~ooz~_ss-x2o ~.a~ t f f ~~ .r ~~ ~~ ""~ `~~ r '. i; ~' ~c ;i s ~;F ~i r ~~ai I r~..~ ~ ..s --l ~~~~~~~ 11 ~ 71 A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. 2008 LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L-1 N89'39'48"W 236.71 L-2 NOT 14'41 "W 6.32 L-3 S86'04'02"E 62.68 L-4 S18'08'S6"W 36.05 L-5 S89'39'47"E 184.72 L-6 S00'20'38"W 30.00 L-2 l-3 t U CUR VE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA BEARING LENGTH C-1 331.50 145.44 25'08'16" N05'19'28"E 144.28 C-Z 200.00 54.89 15'43'25" N10'01'S3"E 54.71 C-3 262.50 32.13 7'00'43" S14'38'34"W 32.11 C-4 276.50 105.97 .21'57'30" S07' 10'11 "W 105.32 - POB I ~r ~ ~ _ ~ .-. ~ I M ~ co '~ (V ~ c0 N N89'18'37"1N 1291.72 1~~ 3 w (N89°18'19"W 1291.76) -^ ao 0 I" ~ o ~ (V M I O WESTWING ESTATES '"oNO ~°, BK 70 PG 7200-7201 z M M ~i l LAND ~ I S o~~ ~ G ~ i a 822 ~ 22 N89° 17'35"W 22~ ~3 2647.29 27 26 `'~, 5•ZZ U~o 27 O~ qlF OF SOP P~ ls~N D. gR~~ 0 100 200 400 600 z O o ~~ ~~ W o ~ '" ~~ c.9 ~ za a `° ~~ a~ BROKAW SURVEYING & MAPPING L.L.C. 11056 LONE STAR ROAD NAMPA, /OANO 83651 (208) 249-0479 E-FILE:Exh_55-H2O Eose.dwg DATE:8-24-07 JOB:07002 'iP ~ ~' ~ern n ~ I ~ 1 [ { I, kip l~ i G ~ 1 lit l ,.$i L } f " ~I f f ~i ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ c I~ ~!1 , _ ~ ~ ~il _ ~r l f [ ~7 ~ F ' ~ { ~ ~ 1 ~ ~+ i ~~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ !~ ' ~.s,~ F , t ~ t~ ~ i ~ k I'-~Y. 1 µ i ~ , ~i 1 ~ i s i ~ i , a ~ a ~ 3 ! , F. , I ~ f I E ~, I ;~ ~ 1I ~ i t; €w i ~ i ~ { ~ ~ ~ Q4, ~ yi; ~ ~; , ~. ~! 7t II ~ i; ~ 7c ` ~~ ~~ '~ t ~ ~4 I rr I ~ 7 ' i r F `~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~; 1~ ~ I` ~j i E ; ~~ _ ~ - r,. ~ > 1 s ~ ~ ~~ 1 ''± e i s- r ~ , 23 22 ~ 0 0 .-3 ao -4 • SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this _ day of , 20_between Treehaven, LLC an Idaho limited liability company whose current address is 3138 S. Bown Way, Boise, ID 83706, the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewerright-of--way across the prenuses and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipeline from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of a sewer line over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a sanitary sewer line and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sewer Main Easement (4) ,~ ~' ~~i y 6 F i ii ~~ ~i i ~I ; f 6! ~!, ~' :? ~ . a; i ~~~ ~ ~~ EASMT SWR MAIN ~: ~~ ,. i! ~~~' 4 !~ ~~ j' ~Y ' ~I • yt EI ~i '~; ~~~ ~, THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of--way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of--way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and yeaz first herein above written. GRANTOR: Treehaven, LLC ~ ~ Derick O'Neill, Manager STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this ~ Z ~ ~~ day of /r ~ A 20,~ efore me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, pets Wally appeared ~l ~-k~ ~ `/U8/ / / known or identified to me to be the Manager of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fist abo,Y~,ttLen. O''~~e4~o:E eo~ ~,*~ ,its, (SEAL); ~ ~OTA,p~, °~ ., /(f 1// " -qe ~ OTARY UBLI OR IDAHO ~. ~°UB L1G .•' ~~ Residing at: /'by~ ~; ~ /,~ ~'•.~`~~q ~'°•...o.•.••~o ~.d° Commission Expires: U3 -- R1- 2,[J r/ T ~ ~~ Sewer Main Easement •~'~~~,~ F„~+•`~~, EASMT SWR MAIN (4) r;- ~? r' ~~ -1 i.' ~I ~; i ~~ `.~ }. ,~ r: t F i5 ~ ~; ~; r >s ~: I §~ } y- 1~ i{ ~; ~. a t 4_ .~ i` Commission Expires: GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk Approved By City Council On: STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) On this day of , 20_, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY DE WEERD and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO Residing at: Commission Expires: Sewer Main Easement (4) EASMT SWR MAIN ~~ e ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ' F~.. } GS ~~ ~;~. s ~ t ~ a ~,. ~_ . t t ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ a t J ~ E~ ~ } is r ~ ~ ~ .F f t s ~ _ ~ t ~ i a ~j~` i ~ i ~~ it E ~~ c axS~ [ .; ~ f ~ ~ .. ti ~ ~ -. € a k ~~3 ~ t5 1 ,r x it r~ [ p ~ ;~ Er. i ~ ~~ ~ ~ i 1~~.~ ~ }L ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1~ ~~ f j ~ , ~ S ~ f" ~ ~ k ~ ~ 'S ~ ~ ~ •. .~ t L ~ t.~ ~ t, 6 t 3' ~~ A ,x f. ~~.} ~ -~ ~ - ~ ~4~ ~ p a F_ ~ ~y ~ / . F~1 r ~ ~ F, ~ }i Y'i ~ 1 ~ {~ t t 3 ' ~ ' t 1 ~ i ~ F~ 1 , n ~3i 4. t n 4 ~5 ~~ 1{ ~ ~. , _ t i~. < ~ f 5i I_ - fi r ~ ~ c r;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :a. 4 ~ p''.\ ) i '. it ~ ~ i a 1. ~f` ~a - 5 ~. J. F ~; ~.....~ „~ . ~ i. k, iS'~ f k s M l C ~ ~~ ~ ~k ~ ~ i ~ 3~~ Ir t. i~~~ ~ ;'~,~ d Project: 07002 Date: August 24, 2007 Page: 1 of 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN SANITARY SEWER AND UNITED WATER IDAHO EASEMENT A pazcel of land situated in the northeast %a of the southeast %a of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southeast corner of said Section 22, from which point, the south quarter corner of said section bears, N.89°17'35"W., 2647.29 feet; thence, along the east line of said section, A) N.00°20'38"E., 1734.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, 1) N.89°39'48"W., 236.71 feet; thence, 2) N.07°14'41"W., 6.32 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve; thence, 3) Northeasterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 331.50 feet, an arc length of 145.44 feet, through a central angle of 25°08' 1 T', and a chord bearing and distance of N.OS°19'28"E., 144.28 feet to a point of reverse curvature; thence, 4) Northeasterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 200.00 feet, an azc length of 54.89 feet, through a central angle of 15°43'26", and a chord bearing and distance of N.10°Ol'S3"E., 54.71 feet; thence, non-tangent from said curve, 5) S.86°04'02"E., 62.68 feet to the beginning of anon-tangent curve; thence, 6) Southwesterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 262.50 feet, an arc length of 32.13 feet, through a central angle of 07°00'43, and a chord bearing and distance of S.14°38'34"W., 32.11 feet; thence, tangent from said curve, 7) 5.18°08'S6"W., 36.05 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve; thence, 8) Southwesterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 276.50 feet, an arc length of 105.97 feet, through a central angle of 21°57'30", and a chord bearing and distance of 5.07°10'11"W.,105.32 feet; thence, non-tangent from said curve, 9) 5.89°39'47'B., 184.72 feet to a point on the easterly line of said section; thence, along said easterly line, 10) 5.00°20'38"W., 30.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL containing 0.39 acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO, all Covenants, Rights, Rights-of--Way, Easements of Record, and other Encumbrances." :: EXHIBIT KB" attached, and by this reference made a part hereof. C:11RR1070ff11Exh SS-H20 Ease.doc ~F ~~ ~~ ~ ~ f S ~~ +` ~~ I ~ ~ s ti~ ~ i x. z !~ kf ~ ~ ~. .~ r 3,~s , ~ ~i ~ {'z 1' ~ }D Sid !~ ~ ~~ ` 5 ~ ~i I. k ~: ~ F j~ ~r t ~ i, ~~ t ~, s ~ ~ 1 i~ ~ ~ ~ ~) a YYY x ~ f} ~ 7i }~ i r- ~ ~i q~ i ~t i < . r r~ < ~ y~ ¢ 1 • k;XHISIT "B" A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. 2008 23 LINE TABLE LINE BEARING ISTANCE L-1 N89'39'48"W 236.71 L-2 N07' 14'41 "W 6.32 L-3 S86'04'02"E 62.68 L-4 S18'OB'56"W 36.05 L-5 S89'39'47"E 1$4.72 L-6 800'20'38"W 30.00 22i 0 L-3 ~ C-2- C-3 00 -L-4 a- I U U 1 L-5 L-2 L-6_- POB L-1 it '~ CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA BEARING LENGTH C-1 331.50 145.44 25'08' 16" N05' 19'28"E 144.28 C-2 200.00 54.89 15'43'25" N10'01'S3"E 54.71 C-3 262.50 32.13 7'00'43" S14'38'34"W 32.11 C-4 276.50 105.97 21'57'30" S07' 10' 11 "W 105.32 z rl ~ O ~ ~f a°'o ~ o tD A ~ N W O .--i ` N89'18'37_W 1291_72 _ ~ w ~ ~ ~ (N$9°18'19"W 1291.76) ^~ ao o ~ ate. ~ ~ ° z~ ~ I o °NO ;~~ WESTWING ESTATES o ° ~ x BK 70 PG 7200-72Q 1 ~ `-~ ~ °~ M r N l L A ap r l SG ~5 ~ ~G ~ ~ F / 8022 ~ 22 N89' 17'35"W 22 23 2647.29 27 26 'n~s'Z2 _U~~o 27 O~ qlF OF SOP P.1, ls~~ D. gR~~ 0 100 200 400 600 BROKAW SURVEYING & MAPPING L.L.C. 11056 LON£ STAR R~40 NAMP.4, IDAHO 83651 (208) 249-0479 E-FILE:Exh_SS-H20 Eose.dwg DA7E:8-24-07 JOB'07002 F ~ ' L ,. ~~'x ' ~~ i? ~' ~ ~ ~{ ~ ~~ i ~ i €f I!i ~~ I ~ ~ ~'f ll;. , SF I ~{ 1~ r I~;i ~ ~t I j I~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ' I~ ~ ~i ~, ~ , ~ ~ ~ f~~ i y ~~ ~ 33 li~ ~ +~ ~ s f ' e~ ~ ~ 4 I ~ ~ ~ I r { li ~ t ~ k~ ' •!. ` I ~. y } k • ~ Page 1 of I Scott Steckiine From: Russ Hepworth [cuss@thelandgroupinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 3:00 PM To: Scott Steckline Subject: Southeast Comer Marketplace Sewer & Water Easement Scott, We are hereby requesting the City Council to relinquish the sewer and water easement recorded as instrument No. 108022881 located in phase 1 of the Southeast comer Marketplace. This commercial development consists of two phases. During the site development of lot 17 in phase 2 of this development the building pad was relocated to provide adequate setback from the Milk Lateral irrigation easement which runs through that lot. The new location of the building pad was over the water main as described in the original easement. The water main was relocated to avoid the new building pad location. The new location of the water main was now in the phase one portion of this development and a new sewer and water easement was prepared for both phases one and two. The new sewer and water easement for phase one was recorded as instrument No. 108057322. Thanks for your help. Let me know if you have any questions. Russ Hepworth, EIT Principal 462 E. Shore Drive, Suite 100 Eagle, ID 83616 ph. 208.939.4041 ext. 106 fax. 208.939.4445 email. russCa~thelandgrouoinc.rnm 5128/2008 ~ ~ ~. ~ , ~ F ~ f t , , s r i s t ~ ~ ~ r i rr( ~ ~ a ,. ~ __, ,, T }; 1` E~ z ~ i ' f A tt{~ RL ( { N ~ f f $ , T ~ ~ 3 ~ `~ # 1. ~ q ~' ~ a4 ' 1 ~? ..~ i ~ ~}.: .A - 6~_ r fir. t ~. ' ~ .~ f?. ~ ~y~~. { ~. , ~ (~(}{ 51 '1 '~ ,.,. d. _ S 6 i F 1.t i i ~L~ ~ PPtt i i. ~:-' I~_ l e r ; i' ~~'~i ' } } ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ J ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~'~i" t ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ . ~' M 1 i y i i 7 1.~. ! _ ~ . # ! ii i ~ i~ ~ ~3 j ~> t ~ j f - ~ f 33, i. i } ~ ~ 4 _ ~~~ }' ~ {] ` E, ~ 9~ f J s t ~,~ ~ ~ 9. ~ ; ~ _. t ~ I s t , ~ ~ [ ii f a ~. z ~ i ~ r, ~ , E_ ~ o ~.~ ~ a; l j H 0 0 June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-G REQUEST Request for Easement Relinquishment for SEC Marketplace No. 1 by Public Works Department AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: See attached CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of'the Ctiy of Meridian. S n ~~ ~ tr ~ ~ ~~ ~ t ~ ' ~ E b { i ~ L r ~ y~- ~ ~ , i ~ ~ r ; ~ ~~,~. ~ ~ ~. ~ , ~ ~ ;. ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , 1 ~ ,„ ~, ~ ~ _ + t; } ~, ~ ~ i i 1 _ ~ ~ ~ Y 1 ii t, ~F 13 P ~ ~ 2 i+ { f / I ~~ 3 ~ .p i ~ x ay ~ r~ Y ~ ~ ~ e i ~ E p ~ h ~ 5 ~ `~- ~ ~~1 ~ F ~ ~~ 1 ° ,~ r~ ~ # :~~,. f ~ , ; ~~ ~ ~~: ~ 3 ;~ t „ ' ;` f E ~ , ~ '~?, Yd' r ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ a ( ti' [~ o- i ~ ~ i q v 3v ~ ~ ~ i 1 ~ { E ~~ ,~ r ~ 3 ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~~ .' i ` ~ ~ ~ 9( t H ' 1 ~ t ~ ~ a ~ L 1~ ~ S 3 ~.; ~ l - _ - _ l. }, ~ ~ ~ F 7 v ~ -t ~' ~ ~~~ 1 + ~ i ~ ' ` ry qp y 3. I. ~ , t 7 ~, t E { j !i ?~ v ~ 1 _ e ~ a: ~ ;;. 3 ~ . F i ~,. !i j i ~ ~. • City of Meridian Public Works Dept. enna W~~~`~ ~~ ~e ~~0 To: Mayor De Weerd & City Council ~it~ ~t~ ~~~~~~ arty ~1Ic~~ ®~cc From: Karie Glenn CC: File Date: 5/30/2008 Re: Proposed Agenda Items for 6/3/08 City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following items be placed on the 6/3/08 City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration: 1) Sewer Easement for Ja ker's Subdivision b Treehaven LLC . Off--site sewer easement. Recommended Council Action: Approve the Sewer Easemen# for Jayker's Subdivision by Treehaven LLC and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest 2) Reouest for Easement for SEC Marketplace #1 by Public Works. Previously recorded easement has been revised and recorded again. Due to overlapping easement recordings, we request that this version (#108022881) be relinquished. Recommended Council Action: Approve the Request for Easement Relinquishment SEC Marketplace #1 for project2 and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest Thank you for your consideration. • Page 1 ~ ~ *~~ . ~ [k~ i E ;i r t t ~ k~ ~i ! ~ ~ ~ =rd f'F ~ 3 `~ [~ '' ~ r I i ~ I ~A . ~` g`~ tt 11 1r S k ~ f ~~~ I ~ ~ j~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ` ` ~ ~I ~ 9l ~ E I , ~ , 8 ., '~ ~ ~ ' I r I t ~ p ~ t 4... ~ ~. ? N - ~ ~ t ~ I 1 ~~' ~' € '; ) 'r ~ t' f s ~ I ~ ~ I ' E, s; - i ~ ' i t { Y .,~ , 1 1 i ~ . ) ~ ~ S ~ ` i ~ 3 ~ k ~ _ ~ f £ 1 S t S I ~ - I ~ = 7 s 1 f, h~ i ;: t t t ~ I • G ~ p. ,. ` , , i 1 , . 3 I ~ 1 r `` k ~ R } ' ~ ~~~' ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~~ t I~ 1 j} ~ ~ . S 1 ! I 4 4 i 'G q R fY 1. 7 1,b p:. ` ., t ( ~ 1 ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~, ~ C4 lk ~ 1 - i l 1 FFF t . . p I I i ; 3 ~ g • E IDIAN ~ -- 4^' 1 ~ ~e.~ d~ 4. .. 4 4yc~ } 6/3/2008 Re: Easement Relinquishment, Southeast Corner Marketplace Subdivision No.l To Whom It May Concern: The City of Meridian does not have any objections to the following proposed relinquishment of the utility easements located within the above subdivision. Feel free to contact me if you have further questions. Thank you ~~ ~~ SC®TI' S'I'I'ECKLINE Development Services Coordinator Meridian Public Works Department 660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 200 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Ph: (208) 898-5500 Fax: (208) 898-9551 z.'. i f. ~- d' ~: ~. 9 ~. MayorTammy de Weerd City Council Members: Keith Bird Joe Gorton Charles Rountree David Zaremba S t*; ~ t s i 6 ~' ~ 8 1 i $ ~ ~ } ~~~~ 3 .~ ~ t E ~ 3 a. i 4~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~~~ 1. k ~ ~}G~ t 3 ~Y a 1~~_ _ ~: ~-~ i > i '' ,., ~, ~. '!` ~ t 3 1 ~# ~ ~ /i ~ f ' ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~l i i ~ .c 7 { ~ Y 4+ t ~ ~ '~ ~ i .,~ r ~ ~. s t I ~~`~ t' ~ ~ ~ t~ ~~ 4 A i- ,pP 9 ~ s '' ~~ y(( a ~; ~, ~~ Y' f ~ ~ :. ~ ~ ~' ! ~ 'i ~ - ` } ~ } F is - '~ ~~ k ~~' ~ .. k , L i i' f ~ ; a ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. DAVID NkYARRO AMOUNT .00 0 BOISE IDAHO 02l28/DB 01:34 POG 11 X11111 II11~I,ff 11II 1nI OEPlJTY Path Thompson ~! IIIII'~II~1111~~~~lIWI~1! ~~~ 11~ RECORDED-REQUEST OF City of Meridian 108622881 SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this j~ day of, 20~between~~m~S A ~ icS~Zt-"~ u;-the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the patty of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of--way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of--way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of--way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement EASMT SW MAIN rfa THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of--way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of--way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they aze lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and yeaz first herein above written. GRANTOR: ~ii9~n,e~s ~~JJ~c2~ LG c President !~ e ~ t„r- STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this ~8~` day of 20 0_ a ,before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State; ~ ersonal appeared ~,. ~, known or iden~it ed to me to be the I~ee~ .-~.,...+u~ ~ of the ~ that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such ce perat~e~x executed the same. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day ~-- ~ e.,,... NOT Y PUBLIC FOR IDAHO Residin Commission Expires: ii ~ Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement EASMT SW MAIN ~~~ ;f 1 #F, i ~ y iii ~~ iC t ~f. ~ ~ ;. i :~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ f i ~ ~ s ~ jji / f t M ~. ~ a is ~ ~ , ~~ ~ ~ .i ~i ',. ' ~,. ~ ~ ~ E y ,igg i sl ~ ~ ;' i ~ , ~'~ r ~ -, ..- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i t I o r- i !' ~ ~ t t ! ~;i~ t~ 'r' t d ~~ F.; i ; r i~. ~ i ~ { ~ ~ r~~ ~ {~ ~ f i 4 j j~ 1 44k444 C tt ~ ~[ CITY OF MERIDIAN ~~~~"~~~~~~. '. F o Tammy de Weerd a or _ ~~~~ - 9 ~~ Jaycee Holman, ity Clerk ~, p r tsi • ,~ Approved by Council on : '''/''~~~~r " ' ~••~~, STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada, ) on this day of (~~______~,20~ before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho, pe4~sonally appeared Tammy de Weerd and Jacyee Holman, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Idaho and who subscribed their names to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WI~REOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. SEAL ~~~sa~!•a~ ~ • ~~~a_4-~gt'~-- "-•Q ~~ ~i~ otary Publi for Idaho ~e Residing at _~ l ~ < ~ ~ Ib a ~ My Commission Expires: e-~ 1-'l ~ . I a - • • ~ • •.... • Pager u 3 ' y jj r 1 ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ r {~.', ' - ~ ~ ~ =' { < T~ ~ , ~ ;. t y : ~ ' '., ~ FFF ~ ~ ~ } 4 t~.' ~ ~4 F `} 7 i t1 ,. ~~ i ! ~ vE t ~?. ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ' Q Y~ N' ~ i ~ ~. }} .~~ i a ;. t ~ ~ !' S ~ 3 f ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'F; ~ ~ ' ; C j ~ C t ~ ~ ~ i k )` ~ 1 f ' 4 3~" ~ { ~ [ ' ? } . I `k 4 ' 4 ~ r {i1( !~ i~ ~` ; ~~ # Z j [ 1 i ~ ~ }~ ~ :~ d a t; ~ '1 ~ j 7 ~~ ~~ ;f t ~ 1 ~ ~ f C i fi ~ ~: ~-$ I { ' ~ E; d R t j ~ f ; 11~~ ~ ~Ai ' ~ . ~ ~ ry ~ ~ ~-~~ } ~: t i ~ ~ ~ ,. E '~ ~~ d" , x ;~~ r ~ ~~ ~~~ a ~ ~, ~ ~' ~ t 4a ~. ~ ~ ~~_. 6 ~i$ #. i ~~ ~'~~ ~~ ~ a ~ ~ ~~ t E~~ ~ ~] ~ ~ ~' ~~C; ' G e f _~ ~ ~~. is ( ~77 ~ _ ~ ~ .~, ~ ~a ~ ~ ,. ~ rl S ~: ~. ~= s FOX Land Szrrveys, /nc. 1515 South Shoshone St. a Boise, Idaho D 83705 D 208-342-7957 a 208-342-7437 FAX DESCRIPTION FOR A SANITARY SEWER. AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT (PHASE 1) A RORTlON OF THE NORTiiWEST'/s OF SECTION 4, TowivsHip 3 NoRrH, Rwv~E 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CnY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO A Portion of the Northwest 4 of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly descnbed as follows; COMMENCING at a found Brass Cap Monument marking the Northwest comer of Section 4, from which a found Brass Cap Monument marking the North '/e Corner thenrof bears South 89°49'fl8° East, a distance of 2,659.38 feet; 1. thence along the Westerly boundary of ~Ction 4, South 00°36'13° West, a distance of 1116.00 feet to a point; 2. thence South 89°51'00'" East, a distance of 283.53 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; 3. thence continuing South 89°S1'00° East, a distance of 8.5~ feet to an angle point; 4. thence North 00°09'00° East, a distance of 34.50 feet to an angle point; 5. thence South 89°51'00" East, a distance of 22.98 feet to an angle point; 6. thence South- 00°57'07° West, a distances of 250.27 feet to an angle point; 7. thence South 44°51'00° fast, a distance of 26.81 feet to an angle point; 8. thence South 89°S1'00° East, a distance of 153.16 feet to an angle point; 9. thence North 00°09'00° East, a distance of 20.21 feet to an angle point; 10. thence South 89°31'00° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 11. thence South 00°09'00° West, a distance of 20.21 feet to an angle point•* 12. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 170.98 feet to an angle point; ~ ~.x, r ~ , A ~~ (~ F F F ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ y ~ ~ {1{ ~ ~- ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ E ~~ ~ ~ ~ '1 ~ pt F ~ ' i• ~ ~~j j E F S ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ a~ tft . ~( e ~~ ~ ( r ~ ~~ ' t L}" '~ `,: EY i iii i ~ ~ ~ k ~, I 1~ ~ i . ~ ~ ~, i ~ '~~, 1 ~~ S ~ -;~ ~ ~ i , ~ F C ~ ~ 1~ ~ i jf f ~ ~ ~q ~ y 3~ } ' ~ ~ ° { a € ~ ~1 ~ i ~ , € ' N ~ ~ t ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~. i R ~ i i i { ~ 5 ~' - a •. , ~ 1 ; 1 ~~ ~ i ~ ~: ~ l ~ '~~f~ ~ . ~', ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: } ~. i 1 ~ . 1s l I ~~ [ f [!. i F :.1~ ~ '~ y y 1 aP, I I "a j ... ~ ` ~ .~ , it .±. i I' I!~ ~~ ,' ~IIt 01 i 13. 14. 15. 1'6. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 2s. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. thence North 4a°35'16° East, a distance of 149.42 feet to an angle point; thence North 00°35'16° East, a distance of 153.58 feet to an angle point; thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 43.30 feet to an angle point; thence South 00°09'00° West, a distance of 5.49 feet to an angle point; thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 13.50 feet to an angle point; thence North 00°09'00° East, a distance of 25.49 feet to an angle point; thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 57.28 feet to an angle point; thence North 01°48'53° East, a distance of 21.75 feet to an angle point; thence North 11°53'29° East, a distance of 31.69 feet to an angle point; thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 4.2.24 feet to an angle point; thence South 00°35'00° West, a distance of 3.89 feet to an angle point; thence North 89°24'44° West, a distance of 22.55 feet to an angle point; thence South 11°53'29° West, a distance of 30.29 feet to an angle point; thence South 01°48'53° West, a distance of 35.02 fleet to an angle paint; thence South 00°35'16° West, a distance of 95.20 feet to an angle point; thence South 89°24'44° East, a distance of 40.17 feet to an angle point; thence South QO°35'1'6° West. a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; thence North 89°24'44° West, a distance of 10.17 feet to an angle point; thence .South 00°35'16° West, a distance of 51.22 feet to an angle point; thence South 45°35'46° West,. a distance of 165.90 feet to an angle point; thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 360.62 feet to an angle point; thence North 44°51'00° West, a distance of 34.96 feet to an angle point; thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 22.67 feet to an angle point; Page 5 ~ ~_ t~« p ~, ` t, ~ r E. t ~~ 3 ~ , F i ~ jt ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ i~ Y~ L" ~4 ~ 1 I'~. F~ r 1 t ., `~ 1: ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ( f !~ 1 1 f ~ 1 1~ (' II 7 ' ~ !~ ~ ' : s 1 ~ ~~ F £~ (i ~ J~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I 36. thence North 00°09'00° East, a distance of 22.09 feet to an angle point; 37. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 16.83 feet to an angle point; 38. thence North 00°57'07° East, a distance of 136.68 feet to an angle point; 39. thence North 89°02'53° West, a distances of 1'1.00 feet to an angle point; 40. thence North 00°57'07° East, a distance of 71.08 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing. 23,787 square feet (0.546 acres) more or less. Subject to existing easements and rights-of way as any may exist, of record or not of record. TOGETHER WITH: A Portion of the Northwest %, of Section 4, Township 3 North. Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ctty of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows; COMMENCING at a found Brass Cap Monument marking the Northwest comer of Section 4, from which a found Brass Cap Monynaent marking the North 4 Comer thereof bears South 89°49'08° East; a distance of 2,659.38 feet; 41. thence along the Westerly boundary of Section 4, South 00°36'13° West, a distance of 1116.00 feet to a point; 42. them South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 127.18 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; 43. thence continuing South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 44. thence South 00°09'00° West, a distance of 31.50 feet to an angle point; 45. thence South 45°09'00° West, a distance of 34.14 feet to an angle point; 46. thence South 00°09'00° West, a distance of 14.61 feet to an angle point; 47. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance ~ 11.25 feet to an angle point; 48. thence South 00'00'00° West, a distance of 28.98 feet to an angle point; P~?P ~ n~l.Le ~~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ p k' ~ ~ € a I ~ ' F I ; ~ ~~ ~ ~~ I ~ ~ ~ { , ~~F ~ ~ ~: ~~ t. ~ . ; ~ € ~,; ~ ~~ , ~ ~t: ~~" . i ~ ~ << ~ ', ~~ ~ ~ t 1~~ ~ ~ ` Vi ' ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ' 1 . ' ~ , ' ~ i ~~~ I :. I tt ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~`~ ,~ ~. s ~ ~ ~ . ~ ,. ~ 49. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 11.32 feet to an angle point; 50. thence South 00°09'00° West, a distance of 127.55 feet to an angle point; 51. thence South 45°09'00° West, a distance of 27.86 feet to an angle point; 52. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 35.29 feet to an angle point; 53. thence North 00°36'13° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 54. thence South 89°51'00° East. a distance of 26.84 feet to an angle point; 55. thence North 45°09'00° East, a distance of 11.29 feet to an angle poirrt; 56. thence North 0~°09'00° East, a distance of 171.14 feet to an angle point; 57. thence North 45°09'QO° East, a distance of 34.14 feet to an angle point; 58. thence North 00°09'00° East, a distance of 23.22 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 5,992 square feet (0.137 acres) more or less. The total easement area of the iwo portions is ,29.779 square feet (0.883 acres) more or less. Subject to existing easernents and rights-of-way as any may exist, of record or not of recxsrd_ Todd Waite, PLS 4999 ,., END OF t5' ~ ~. TJF~j . W:1PROj~'~'S~7~7'a33.PRJtPRQJBC'E~DESCRU'TfONSl733SSFi20DESGPHI .DOC ~~ ~ ~r ~ ~.f e 3; ~., ~; ~ ~• i r , ~ }: if .. ~~ _ ~, f ,,,~ ~ ?:. ~. I' ~' s ~'~ r ~ j;. ~~ ,~ #a ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~, ~ '. ~ i 1 ~ 6' ~ )SF ~tt 1 ~ ; ! ~': E, I f r ~ ~ I { f . (i = ~ . ~ ~ ~~ k '~ ~ s i , ~ ~' 1 ~' ~~ ~ rI- i. ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ r ~~~ ~ ~ .g, I y ~ t ;-~5- ~, '~ au i~ i. it ~ o-~ t 3j ~~, i.. r: ~ ~ ~' t ~ '~ ~ 11 "t ~ .r ~ s i~ 9 Vii' 1 t 3 ~ _ ~ i.~ c A = !t { ~~ ~ 1 ~~ 1. 4 f -lt ~ ; `~ f i, ' S 5 ~ ~, ~ ~ ~~2 ~ ~ +i~ ~ ~ F ~ j ~ S1 ~ G ~ a. 3' 4 ~ `~ ~. y ~ r ~ ~ ~t t~~ ~~; 1t ~ 7 ~ ~ M1 s l;; Erf 7;~ ,, i ~ r ~- ~ '~ .` ~~ ~P~f:il €' r N M ~ fl ~ 11 ~ 1 1~~~ Z 1. I '~ OZZ SJI~ 9~~~~~ ~~ I ~ ~o- 1, ~ ~ `~ ~ ~~ 1 /~ Oi 1tlW W3a'3WWW ~ 1 ~ 1 1 m3 ~s~~~ ~' ,~~ N2 ~zoiz~emrzzzz i~3; ~ Ig }}CCyy I ~33~~11if 3 cWi~~~ ~ ~~~~3~~~~ 1I; ~3~~~ W Z <~ JJ Jj.iJJJJ~ W VV 1°~ ai Y°g~ ' ~~ I ~ ~ ~~ a3m3;a;mmm ~~~ I, rm.m: :r=: ~ ~1, z ~ ~ ~ ~ '*-~ -, U~ ~ a~~ ~~~ ~~ ems ~ ~~: r ~ , e qNo ~5~9399;93~ ~ ;~ W ~' 1 8' I 1 ;plil I O ~ Cam' 18 $ 1 ~~~ I~ U1 s;i ~ 1 1' ~~ r 1~ I ~z Y~~ ~ a~ $°I ~ Itallu0e .~ ~ I 1 I 1 I 1 1 ~`s~,; I w Di I ~ i p A~ 1 1 •3 I I ~ , ~~ i 1 = t4 '° '~ J1+ ~ ~ ~ 1~~~ I = , Q 1 rr ~ n ~--__-=_ --- ~ _ 1 _~,_„ I~g . I~Wa~OOi ramiac ~+ ~6 ~ I ~ 5 i w a p ~'~~va -r a .~-_. ^~-ma~~~_. _ _ ~„ 1. I, 1 ~~ I I I~ I I. ,, 1 I I i 5 I~ a 1 II a _~~ '~~~~ ~ ,~~€ rv~~~~ LL~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~< . °` ~a~ppQQ~ ~b~~0 0 ~` U ~~ ri ~~~ ~ a `d ~>' v n ~. ~ ~.gy s~~~~°~ a vii a°~ ~ 3 ~ ~++~ 0 ^ o D~ N Q2D v #~~ ~ ~ ~~ a a ~~ ~~^ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~qVA ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ y~~- ~~ ~~ I''Il~~~~~~ I' 11 I ~g~~ ~§ I~I I~il;~ ,w,s,M,~a~ - ~+"~ racrae .tt•n~ M.e~.9s.oos ~ ~ ~`~ ~ 3 _ z yob -d-e.~.~~~ - - S9tt ,pq,821 ~ I'eS - • - • -grilse M.swems- ~ - . _ . ~--~- ~ 1 .1 I ~1 ~1 0 June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-H REQUEST Change Order No. 12 for North Black Cat Trunk Sewer with Brown Construction, Inc. for $12,534.00 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. ,: kl lti ~ , ~, , i ~ ~ ~ ~ x> ~ ~_, ~`, ~ ' p _ ~ ~ ~ ' ri~ ai~ ~ 4 ~ 1 ;~ r a ~ ~ '.~ ~ { d 3 ~: }- ~ I ~ ~~ t ~i 9I e ~ ~ `~ I s. i. ' ~' pp zz t j f ~ ~r ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~t ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ f fit. 1, I a r } ~' ~ ° it ~ a~ i~ I 3 ~ 1;i i COMMENTS See attached o~~ ~ave.= • • CHANGE ORDER 12 PROJECT: North Black Cat Trunk Sewer DATE OF ISSUANCE: 5!29/08 EFFECT IVE DATE: OWNER: Primeland Development Co. I.I.P CONTRACTOR: Brown Construction, Inc. ENGINEER: JUB Engineers Page 1 of 3 Yon are directed to eke the following changes in ~e CoM,ract Documents. • Attachments: Calculations for additional Trench BacktlR RECOMMENDID BY OWNER; B Date: s/2gros APPROVED BY OWNER: C@c b.u~- Date: ~'t ~ W8 ACCEPTED BY CONTRACTOR: By Date: _ s/z /08 Attest: T y weerd, Mayor '^~~/ ~~ Date: -~ ~~ V 4 Date: Approved by City Council: [s7 ~~ ` ~ I ~pPpj' ' 9,~'~,~ ~. i. R4! ~ C/~ait s s ~4 ~~. ~. l~ ' ~ f ` ' ,: ~ i ~ ~ i t ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ i { k ~ I ~ ~ e s ~ ~ x t~ ~ ~~ L ~ ~ ~ j ~ [ { ~ I ~ ~ P ~ F ~ `~ t I' ( i F f ~ ~j ~i j ~ } i. } ~~ ~ .3 ~ ~i~ , I ~ f ~ t # ~ /' 3 ~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ i = ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a >> I ~ ~ l ~ ~ ; ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 I 6r ~ i . ' 1 F' YI Z ~ ' ~ `. Y ~f 9 7 ~ ii~ ~, ik i q~ I ~ ~ L ~ '~ ~ ~' i ~,~ ~ ~' i' k~ ~ i _ ~ i ~', & .~ ~ ~ i ~ k,. 5, _ F ~ ~ f i ~~ i ~ ~ r '~ ~ ~ F ~4 1 , ~ . z ,1 Z . b j r~ fSfS~~ ,z' j j r ,{ ~, 1 ~ 1 ~ I- t i I ~, ©ilSf.~t~tr;~!!!~i ~~r • 1 PRIN11uLAND DEVELOPMENT 312Q Vd. BELLTOWEIt DR SUITE lOfl MERIDIAN, ~AHO s3~ 6589 Bennett Rd. - Name one {208} 465-027 - •fax ~~1VOiCt': DATE INVOICE NO. 5t?7/2~08 fl8-923 TERMS faROJECT 30I -NORTH BLACK CAT TRK SEWER ITEM QTY pESCRIP'itON RATE AMOUNT I 6,267 PAY REQUEST #6: IMPORTED TRENCH BACKFII.L (SEfi ATTACHED SHEET FOR BREAKiK}Y'~ 2.00 12,534.00 • Total $12,s3A.00 ~ ~' _ ~ _ ~ 'j ` ~ ~ ,' ~ i q{~ i ~ s ~ ,,. y~ ~ ,; t~ ! , ; ~ ~ ~: r ,[ ~ ~ ~~ ! k s F 1, ! ~ ; ~ , F S t ,> r Y ~Z V C ~ E ~ ' ~ ~: - 4 _ ~ M1. ' ~ ~ ' FF k " ~ I t [ ' ~, , s :: ~_ ~ : ~ ! ~ + € ~' ! ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~= ~ t• i sf ~~ r -~ i ' + F ~ I ~~ , ~'i ' ~ i ~,~- i ; +'7 z : : ~ ~ ~ f ; ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ : ~'f 1 f ~ f ~. } ~ ~ S~ e 1. } ~ ' ,~~, ~. • ' ~.~f f i ~, 1 ~. V i , {{ ~ i ~ ~ ~' ~ f , 15~ ~ + ! r ~ • ~ ~ yr. ~, t 5i~ ~~ 1 r ~ ~ c ~ t ~~ f ~ ': ~ ~ c(1 r ~ ~ r ~ a ,~~~ , ,a i it i . f 7~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ t S i e1 H ~ ,i~ s. ~{ ~ • iD 83656 I f ' 7 i 1 • J Brown Canstruci~n, #nc. 68810~nraett'I~ad Nampa, i0 ;133G$5 Phor~: I~(Igj ,565-i1Z?ti Fax: (20$} 465-353X Pris~etartti OevelcDmerrt 312t? W. HQlitower Dave Suite 1Dtf Meridian, ID 83645 AtM; Glenn Fitch v,~v R~>1~u~3T~6 fTEM:11yP~}}RTEi3TRfNCH BACKALL Ql'Y: 5,257 E,'f~ CALtX1LATION BRE•s~u+sa LI1+kEAR FEETOi: SEWERTRENCH=1511 LP AVERAGE t?EPTN ~ SEUIfER TRENCIt= 20.0 FT SUBTR~I[1' 3 FT = PIPE 2tIpE (PIPE AND d!£DDIAIG) SUBTRACT 3 Fi'=1i0AD B~tS£ [P[[ RUN SE~TIDN, 9~' q~DAD MIX, A'SPHAtT TOTAL ~ 14 I-TAYEItAGE Dpi QF IIhIIPORTiFQ TRENCH @ACi~f1LL (14.0 FT x $!i: l" Id111?E K '~Li LF~- Z7 = 5,267 C1f TO!FAt. QF WIpCR'!'ED TRENCH H`ILL' P1lrY REQtSE'Si';55 ~ 5,267 CY ~ dos P9L~Lb ~ .CL ~w . .J .. ~~_ n1~'1 ~ ~ t ~ ~ r ~ S -~ _..~ _ ~- i ~' {[~ ~ y. ~'~ ~ i ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IS r~, d -~ , t. ~ ~ c 9~ - i - y t: _ ~ 'y ~ Er r [y ~ {i ] ~ f Ica ~_ ~ - j~_ i ~ ~ ,y q ;~' ~ i ~ ~{r ~ 's~ ~'; ~r' ~ ~ is . ~~~$ ~t ~~ ~, ~~3y ~ ;(~( `, ii, a ~~~ -~' f.; f ~ 4 rr f -fzl r ~~Ci ~l .f'~ ~ Fiy ~F, f '? t~~ E {- (((~ ' ~ «tt '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ {~i - ii~ _ 1j }}4+ ~ ~` Eb~yy `~ ~ ~ ` I Y 1 ~,: .F I ~ ` > S t ;~ ~ 1 ~if Rtr L _ f}~ i4I ; y~ 1~ f~e ~, '~ 4 F I }} ~{{ 1 Ci ty of Mer idi an P ubl ic Wor ks D ept. . ~. Memo a ~ii~y ~~ ~~~~~. ~zt~ cl~p~ ®~~~ To: Jaycee Holman; Tara Green From: Clint Dolsby, P.E. Interim City Engineer dolsbyc@meridiancity.org Meridian Public Works Department 660 E. Watertower, Suite 200 Phone: 898-5500 Fax: 898-9551 Date: 6/05108 R~ Proposed Agenda Item for June 10, 2008 City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following item be placed on the June 10, 2008 City Council agenda, under Consent agenda, for Council's consideration: Change Order No. 12 for North Black Gat Trunk Sewer (construilionl This change order consists of the following work and amounts to 0.7% of the construction contrail: • Additional trench backfill. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approves Change Order No.12for the North Black Cat Trunk Sewer project (construction) with Brown Construction, Inc., for $12,534.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this item. • Page 1 ,--~.~ i ~ ' ~ ~r i ~ 1, t i ~ ~ r ; t ! f ~ ~ , ~ ~t n~ t ~ 2 ' ~ i ~' - s' 3 r ~~ ~" i ~~~~ ~ ' fib ~~, E ~ ~ ~, ~~ a ~~ - ~,. k L° ~ x t ~~ - ~~, ~ r P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~PPP[[[ t h- ~ t b ~ i ~q t~ ~ C +~ `~ SSS ~1 ~) ~'~ i S a { ~ ~ 7 5 ) ~) rI 7 4 ' ~ i . - } ' ! . i, i ~ ~ G f ~ ~ ~ EE , ~ a i , e ~ s R ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :t s y FF ~ ~ i ~' ~ r 3; r ~ ~ t ~ i~ ~ ~ ,;~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ a l:: ~ , ~ r ~ ',~ '~ ~ G ~ c f~~~ ' j ~ 1 - 4 ~ ( r ~~ s ~ ~ r ` i t ii i" ~ ~? F,i f' ~: i _ ~~ ~ , ,_ r. ~ 1 :~.. ,. r 444444 i ' ' X i', i ~ ~ I • • CHANGE ORDER 12 PROJECT: North Black Cat Trunk Sewer DATE OF ISSUANCE: 5/29/08 EFFECTIVE DATE: OWNER: Primeland Development Co. LLP CONTRACTOR: Brown Construction, Inc. ENGINEER: JUB Engineers Page 1 of 3 You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents. Attachments: Calculations for additional Trench Backlfill CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES: Original Contract Price Original Contract Times 1,717,487.31 Substantial Completion: _168 Davs - Mav 12008 Ready for Final Payment: 213 Davs -June I S 2008 days or dates Net Changes from previous Change Orders No. 1 to No. I 1 Net Changes from previous Change Orders No. I to No. I $ 81,976.00 tl nay. Contract Price prior to this Change Order Contract Times prior to this Change order $ 1 776 578 31 Substantial Completion: _168 Days - May 1 2008 , , . Ready for Final Payment: _ 213 Days -June I5 2008 days or dates Net Increase (decrease of this Change Order) Net Increase (decrease of this Change Order) $ 12,534.00 0 days Contract Price with all approved Change Orders Contract Times with all approved Change Orders 1 789 1 12 31 Substantial Completion; Davs - l68 May 1 2008 . . . Ready for final a ment: D 213 J I p y avs - une S 2008 days or dates RECOMMENDED BY OWNER: ACCEPTED BY CONTRACTOR: B By. Date: 5/29/08 APPROVED BY OWNER: C.~ ~~ Date: Gf ~ W$ Date: 5129108 Date: Approved by City Council: 1 t r s ~. 1' C 1~; ~ 1 'r ~ t;. ~n~. 4 ~i ~ 2~ 6 +,y 1 :, 1 Tammy de Weerd, Mayor i j : 111 I~~114~ ~ ~ ~ r Y fv;~ , i f~ € ~ ~ ~ 7 t ~4 ~ _'~~_ J - 7 4ai 1 i ~ 9 ~ ., r ' ~~ ~ ~? t ~ i~~ ~ o- 1 ; ~- , . ~ t 4 ~ ~' ~ ~ , ~ I ' S ~ e. ~' '. ~ ~ ~` t Y ~ 11 4 4 I ii ~ ~ I ( jj y . { f ( i ! 1 ~ j t c2 t ' 1 ~~~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~. tM~' t t ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~~ -r t . s ~* Q c t~ { ;, ~~ t°~ t ~ f C t G 3 ~ )(. ~ , ~i P~ I k ~ .~~~'. ' ~~~ 1~ ~ i _ . t ~ € },i~ t r s ~~ , ~ i zlci' 'fit i ~ t 1 f ~ {{ . E j ~ tV; ~~ ~ ~ ~ "tr ~ I" ~t 9 ~ E+ q ~ , t: ~~ ~ ! ~ i _ ~ i ~ g 1 f { ~ 2 j# ~. }; i f~~ ~ ,~ j i. t {i { Ii .~ Attest: Wifirtt~f}'~3~-, City Clerk ~.Ir~ae ~/+Nr1 Date: ~ ' ~ } !, i~ _ I _ i 3~ .~ ~, i ~ ~ ~_ ~ ' t ,; ~ ~ 1. i ~ I ~' I F ~ ~ '. t c 7 i a ~ i~i f u ~ 3 ; + ;' t . ~ l '' 3 ?. e ~,,~ i_ i ~ s ', ;'~ }- Q I .. ~ ` ~ • • ~>~ a~~~ PRIlt7ELAND DEVELOPMENT .~ 120 W. SELLTOWER DR. SUITE 100 MERIDIAN, @AHO $3646 Invoice DATE INVOICE NO. 5/?7/2flfl8 {18-923 TERMS PROJECT 301 -NORTH T3LACT: CATTRk SE'NF.R ITEM QTY DESCRIPTION RATE AMOUNT ~ 6,267 PAY REQUEST#6: IMPORTED TRENCH BACKFILL (SEE ATTACHED SHEET FOR BREAKDOWN 2.00 1.,531.00 Total $,~53.~.~,o s~~a ~ ' ~; F Ii ^J~ E ~ ~ ~ # ~ F` f ~~ ~ t r~' i R C i r E ~ 111 1 ,' { t `~ 1 ~'~_ ~ ~ ~t _. t i ,~ I ~- J j ~ ~ ~ { ~~~~ 1 1' ~ - k ~, ~ f ~ ! ~ f ~ ~ ~t ~.'' 1 I _: ~i i o si f . , ~ ~ ~ ~ , t ~ ~~ ~ t c x j~ , ~ , ~ ~I i' i ~ ,T w ~ s t i L ;; ~ ~~ ! * 3 ' ~ i ° f ~ ~ ! iy~ :_~ II '! i i f i~ 1 1: .~ ,~ + si ~ ' z~ : ~ ~ ! ~ _ t~ ~f ~ ~,1 ! ~ ~ i 1 ~ . ~ 1 ~~ t; i i ; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ I}~I~; ~. ~ i , . f ~ __ ~ ~'- 1 } t3 t ~ i t~ ~ ~ t i-1 I ~ 7 i ~ j i ~ ~} {' f ~i_ t ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~, i ? s, ~~ } ~ ~;:. 6881 Bennett Rd. -Nampa, iQ 83686 one (208} 465-0274 - i=ax {208) 465-35 tY r ~ 3 ~ ! ~ ~ 1 ~ y' S 1 i"- ~S #,~ ~: !~- ~ I { >> ~ ~ E~ ~,. 3, ~ ; f ~ ~ 4 ! I ~ ~ F t , ~ ;~ ~ I'i ~ ~ 4( ~ II ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ '.. j ~ l 3 ~ 1 yyy ~~ i 1 a ~ x' j ~ ~~, r ~ } ~ I,~ ~ y I i ~ 4 ~ ';€ iY s $rov~rn ConSBructson, Inc, 6881 Bennett Road Nampa, 1D 83686 ;ahone'v<~OS) 865-0~7ti Fax' (20$} 465-35~Z Priiretand Developrrterrt 3120V1t. BelaEtower Drive Suite lOR Meridian, Ip 83645 Attn: Glenn Fitch PAY R,~F[~UESTafi6~ ITfiM: r~APQRTf d TRENCH BACICF9LL QTY: fi.?5T t,,Y CALQ7LATION BREAKppUy~ LlI+t~AR FEETOF SEWER TRENCy= 1511 Lf AVEitAGE DERTH DF SEWER YRENCH= 2~.0 FT SUBTRACT 3 FT ~ PIPE 7DNE PIPE AND 9fiDD~fG) 5U8TR.4C'C 3 F7= FIOAD BOISE (PlT RUN SECT70N, ~" ROAD Mlx. ASPHALT ) TQTAL =14 F'TAVCRAGE DEP'~'hi OF IMPtaRTEli TRENCH BACKFIL! (14.8 FT x 6 FT IIWDE K 2511 ~ Z7 = b„Z67 CY T'CI'F>'I~. (~ IM PARTED TREN~:H BAC~ILL' PAY REQt1EST #G = 6,267 CY b'd l'd PPol e9L~6t ~ ,tz t~t~ f ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ f f~ , ~ - ~,, ,~ E , .: ,~ 1 ~ - ff S Z s ~~ ~~ E ~; ~ jai ! 3 ~ ~ ~. ~~.. ` _ q~: ~ ~ ~IS i r~~ ~~~ ; ~~ F..,~ `~' ~j ~ iii ~t {~,~ ~ ~ij;ti~. ~c3 ~~~~~ SI ~I s y t 4~' S ''1' ' i is ~ x F i _- 3 ~ ~~ ( i t+ ~ fix{ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~, ,~ ~ ,I~ ~ „ ~ ~ ] _ ,~ .i r f;. i 'E ~ E~fF ~ss;. f li .~ +~~ ~Y~i:: ~i ~ e June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-~ REQUEST Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Agreement for Woodlan Springs AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: See attached CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: .CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meeflngs shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~ ~:~li d` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~_~ # >>, ~ r ~ r o ` ~ ~f ~'.. t s I ~ S~ I ~ s~~~ ' l ~ ~. +~ ~' ~ ~ s3 t 3 ~j `I ~ ~ t~j_ t ~, G ~ + ~` ~ y ~- _ ~3 t( x e ~~ 3 + ~ ~ ~, a' 3~. i ~ 1 Y - t~q _~_ ~ ~ 1~ ~ t ~ ~ ?; t ! ~. E ~ 5 ~ ,~ ~ r I - ! ~~~ ,. C ~ Ir r ~,~; r' ~ a' F~ _ i; 1 I ~ a ~~£ ~ Ri I ~ 4~~p ! ~. ~' ~ 14 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ if; ~' ~ s :_ ~ ; ~ ;j s ~ ~ ~`s ~. ~ s :~ ~ ~ '~fi f is i r3 3 { S `~, ; - ~* ` ~' ~ , ADA COUNTY RECORDEIf~~_- AVID NAVARRO ~ Ati90UNi .00 ~ 6 BOISE IDAHO 01I02t~ 1~Pfd RECORDEDcREOUESTOF ~~~ ~I~~~~~~I~IIIIiIIIIiILIIIIIiiIIIII Ciry of 0e-idian 108076616 __ - -- SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this 2. day of ~,~ 20O~between Inl~ (~ Party of the first --~~~~1' the part, and hereinafter called the Grantor, and the City of Mendian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of--way across the premises and property hereinafter particulazly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of salutary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of--way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the azea of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the azea described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement C07175 Sewer and Water Easements 060208.doc ~ I aCl~ ~~ n ~ E ~ j ~ ~ ~~ S~ t j ~ J c ! , I ~ ~ ~~ # 4 f 4 ~ ~ ~ f ~ f t~ , : ~ ~ r ~ { . ~. ~ ~ ~~9; b Ai ~ ~~ ~ i .. x 4 ~ ~ +~ ~ R S -'~ ~ ~~ ~ ~=~ j f E ' i ,; ~ ~ ~i ~i I is ~ j ~ ~ r ~ ' ~~ ' ~ Ti t ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ak ;' t ~ ( y : i 1 ~ ~ 111 Y ~.~ ¢g ~ - Y Y ~_. I e ` ~ ~ ~ (~ E ~ I t~t.i ~ ~ ~ ~ ' , p ' ~ ~ ` ~ i E T / ~ I i ~ t ' ~ f 3 ~ k t € ~ f~ ~'fa ~ ~ ' t` j' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j i }I ~' 1 . i j E ? E~3 ~ L ~ I 3 ~ ~ [ 4~ ? f ~ ~ ~ , ~' }i) I V ~ ~~ I n .' i ~ 5 '~ rl ~ A 9 G ,~~ ~, C: ' ~; i f1t- .. ~'- i, _?e -~ ~. r' ~ • • THE GRANTOR hereby covenant and agrees that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR hereby covenant and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of--way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of--way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no fiuther effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they aze lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. ~ tiL r%~ /Zt ~ K .b .e. cz. Matt Morgan Member STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this 2. day of ~ 200, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ~, known or identified to me to be the member, respectively, of the limit liability company that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such limited liability company executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fist above written. v~ ~iOrq~ `o is "'• ~' ~ ~~',- G8L t C ~~•' ., ~~ ~ ~• ••~''~ dF ID A~~••'~'. Sanitary Sewer ~filMli~atEt'Ivlain Easement ~ ~ NOTARY UB C)~'~OR IDAHO Residing at: /~'t Commission Expires: C07175 Sewer and Water Easements Ob0208.doc ~ ~, , ,,, i ~, .~ ~~' F 'sfl ~! ~: { Y P t I '.. ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ `y` I i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 i ~ ~ , Y ,-. ~ ~. j r , f . ~ f ~ t d ~ ~~_ t a ~~ M y ~ ~ #t ~ ~ ~4. . , ~ i ~ 3~~ t { i f, I f Fr ~ ` ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ i ~ ' { Ir ? 1 ~j #' t . ~ ~~ ~ ~ i' i :$ ~ ti i ~ ~ F `, ~ ~ ;3 x ~; ~ F 4 x , i h (( • o CITY OF MERIDIAN Tammy de Weerd, Jaycee Holman~ityZ~erk ' Approved by Council on STATE OF IDAHO, ) '~. .~ O s 7~ ~ = '~ tts~• P `~. . ss. County of Ada,) ``~~' On this l~~day of Vt~ ~C ,20~, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and Jaycee Holman, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Idaho and who subscribed their names to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fast above written. SEAL ••• ~~•{T j~~•~ ~ • ~ •0~ A~'-'~~~• otary Public for Idaho ti; ,~ '~' `.~ i Residing at: ['~~-~, L]PI ~~ . LD • ~ ~ My Commission expires: ILl- ~ ~-~ ~ • '•`9TE OF l~.• ~•..+•• .q ~~v '. 1. .~ ~ r ~{ i 1 ~ its b - - d i~~ I f![ ' p ~ C ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~A ~ C ~ 1 f ~ i t . i ~~ { } 1 3' k t ~ ~ s r ^~~ E ' b ~ ~ s;~ ~ -r ~ I e t ~ ~ , ; 3, ~ ~~ ~ 7 k? ~ ry. _ ~:_ 1 ~ ~ ~ f . r ~ P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• l ~~ is 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ p 1 M } 1 i j. ~ Y e r. } t J.' t f 1 ! j r '' . ' S ' i 4` ~ ! ~' ~ yt l ~ ~ ~_ ~ _ 1 i ~ t t ~ ;~~ k i _ i; .~ ~} It ' ~ ~, ~ i ~ ~ j ~ ~. ~ ! t~ ~ ;-; 3 Fr q F ~ ~ P1i 1 ~ ,~y , F ~ f ~ ~: ~ r,. _~~ t;. i F ~ 4 i ~n ~- ~ ~ :~ ~ _ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~`~ ~ i 3 ~ ~ ~ E t~ '' ~ j ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ i ~k 7 ~ ~ + ~ t ~.~ ~ 7 I -i ~ ~ r:~ tw' e ~ , ~~ '~ ~ i ~ I ~ ~ t ~~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ ~ § ~ ~- _ ~~ ~ ~,r t ~ ~ ~ ~~ 5z~ F 1 ,~. i ~ ~ a~ i ~ e ~ ~ ~i , ~ r~ ° ~ •y i, t=~ ! + ~ i i777{ yy ~ S) } 1t, ~ ~,. 332 N. ~Broadmore Way Nampa, iD 83687 Ph: (208) 442-6300 • Fax: (208) 466-0944 EXHIBIT `A' LEGAL ~1ESCRIPTION SEWER AND WATER UTILITY EASEMENT FOR WOODLAND SPRINGS, LLC An Easement located in the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 29, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a brass cap monument marking the SW corner of said Section 29; From which an Aluminum Cap Monument marking the West Quarter Corner of said Section 29 Bears N 00°25'22" E 2652.16 Feet; Thence, along the -West Line of said Section 29, N 00°25'22" E 428.15 Feet to a Point; Thence, leaving said West Line S 89°34'38" E 35.00 Feet to a 5/$ inch Iron Rod lying on or along the Easterly Right-of--Way ofNorth Locust Grove Road, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence, S 89°34'38" E, 294.35 Feet to a Point; Thence, S 00°25'22" W 59.99 Feet to a Point; Thence, S 89°34'38" E 167.69 Feet to a Point; Thence, S 02°12'41" W 172.891~eet to a 5/8 inch Iion Rod; Thence, N 89°34'38" W 1.5.01 Feet to a Point; Thence, N 02°12'41" E 1.40.87 Feet to a Point; Thence, N 89°34'38" W 34.79 Feet to a Point; Thence, S 00°25'22" W 9.99 Feet to a Point; Thence, N 89°34'38" W 10.00 Feet to a Point; Thence, N 00°25'22" E 9.99 Feet to a Point; 'Thence, N 89°34'38" W 55.19 Feet to a Point; "Thence, S 00°25'22" W 9.99 Feet to a Point; Thence, N $9°34'38" W 10.00 Feet to a Point; •Thence, N 00°25'22" E 9.99 Feet to a Point; • Thence, N 89°34'3'8" W 19.66 Feet to a Point; Thence, S 00°25'22" W 9.99 Feet to a Point; •Thence, N 89°34'3.8" W 10.00 Feet to a Point; 'Thence, N 00°25'22" E 9.99 Feet to a Point; •Thence, N 89°34'38" W 65.15 Feet to a Point; •Thence, S 00°25'22" W •109.13 Feet to a Point; •'Thence, S 44°34'38" E 19.10 Feet to a Point; L:1Project 6iles\C07195LSurveytLEGAL.DE•SCItIPT[ONSVSewer-Water Utility Easement 3-29-08 BE.doc Page 1 of3 Page~O#~ld._. I~'~ ~i ,.~ '! . ~, f ~I ,' 'i ~, ~~ ; 7 ~, ~f et~t i? t `{ a rv t, °, ,,t £: `'f t; a ~ ., { ~ ',' ,'Ix I ~~` f i i E ~.. ~ ~ ~' ~ tr., _; I ~ `~ .,: o Thence; S 00°25'22" W 51.36 Feet to a Point; Thence, S ~89°34'3'8'' E, 145.49 Feet to a Roint; -Thence, S 00°25'22" W 33:09 Feet to a Point; --Thence, S 89°34'38" E l 1.54 Feet to a I~oint; •Thence, N 00°25'22" E 14..64 Feet to a Point;. .Thence, S 89°34'38" E 1.0.00 Feet to a Point; •Thence, S 00°25'22" W 14.64 Feet to,a Point; Thence; S 89°34'38" E 22.79- Feet to a Point; Thence, S 02°12'41" W 20.O1~ Feet to a Point; ,Thence, N 89°34'38" W 63.71 Feet to a Point; •Thence, N 00°25'22" E 33.09 Feet to a Point; • Thence, N 89°34'38" W 158.55 Feet to a Point; .Thence, N 00°25'22" E 13.39 Feet to a Point; •Thence, S 89°34'3'8" 'E 13.06 Feet to a Point; • Thence, N 00°25'22" E 49.68 Feet tq a Point; •Thence, N 44°34'38" W 19.10 Feet to a Point; •'Thence, N 00°25'22" E 117.41 Feet to a Point; Thence, N 89°34'38" W 11.00 Feet to a Point; •Thence; N 00°25'22" 'E 62.00 Feet to a Point; •Thence, N 89°34'38" W 181.70 Feet to a Point; •Thence; S 00°25'22" W 13.30 Feet to a Point; •Thence, N 89°34'38" W 10.00 Feet to a Point; •Thence, N 00°25'22" E 13.30 Feet to a Point; •Thence, N 89°34'38" W 18.55 Feet to a Point; •Thence, N 00°25'22" E 30.00 Feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said above described Easement encompasses 30,708 Sq. Ft. or 0.705 Acres, more or less. w L:U'roject Fi1es~G07175~SurveyILEGAL DESCRIPTIONSisc~vcr-Water Utility Easement 5-29-08 BE.doa PaOe 2 of3 Page~~~,.- r ~~ 4` ~ 6r f 1 1 ~ ~ ~ i=~ ,~ h 7~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ t ` ~ , 4 r ~ ~~ ~ ~ 7,, i ~ ~ w , ~ ~ i a fi d~ ~~~ ( ,~. r 1 t! ~' t ~~ ~~ 1 ~ k ~ 7 ~ ti ~ ~1' - ~ t F~ e~ i ~ ~ ~ '~ i i j X a' r' ~~~ ~ ~ ~ I oy- yc;~; ~ 3 ~~ ~ E,. ~ 3 , i . ` ~ ! ~~ C g, t n .K ~ r ir4 ~ ~ P j ~ t: s i ~~~ ; , ~ ~~ 9 ~ ,i :F ~ ~ ( ~ ~ , ~ ~ 1 ~ , ~ E ~ ~ . r ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~~ t t. + ~- rP t ~~ I ~ ~ ~ { ~ 222 i'~, S 1 ~ V 1 E Y ~' f Y~ E 99{{ ~7 ~ ~f 7 ~- . 1 ~ 3 ~~ . i a ~t ~ tt ' ~ t ~ ~~_~ ~ ~~ t 1 ~ _ ~ i ~ Y ~ f ~ : L. ~ ~ pp r" ; 5 ~ i 1~ #~ i, ~ ~ a ~ ~_ 1~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ `s y L 66``~~ tir ~ i ~ ~ ~ J: ~ _ ~ ~ ; ~„ ~ ~F~ i ~ E - 4 4 '~ ~ ~2, , ,i. ~ h, r '! • 4 i 7S ~ x p ~ - t ~_ C 1 °! ~ ~ z I ~ I t I x. F ~ $ ~ ~ 7~~ i We t ~ r ~ s~t 1 ~j S ! +' d ~ ,-i o- f ~r ( T $ t ~ ~ ' " ~ e ~: 6 r, _ ~ ~ f, a, ~ i _ 77 ~ [ a . I ,,,f ~ i (~ . Y g r SS •,, a '~• .~1 30 Z .- ~--~ N W N W ON N ~ ~ .,~ Q ~ O Z PLS 7880 Z9 PLS 12220 ~~, _ ,.,,_ _ _ PLS 10782 - - - - - -~1 EXHIBIT 'B' I ~ SEWER & WATER UTILITY EASEMENT A PORTION OF THE 5W U4 OF THE SW U4 OF SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE i EAST. BOISE MERIDIAN I CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO ~ 2008 ' F~TI°tIRE PHASE 40' 20' 0 40' 80' I I S89'34'38°E SCALE: 1" = 80' ~ 35.00' I ~ POINT OF BEGINNING I _ _ _ _ S89:34 :38 E 294.35' ~ Np L.~.~ -,___~~._ __...~--~h ;N ~~,` , r.~ N89'.34 :38 "1Y 181.70' :4i ~'~' I O Di "ryi I ~ ~ i L.35 `t ~ ~ I p ~ ~58~34 :3B E" 1 7.69' vi; . I A I d a° f I C N E++ ~• ~ WI ~ t N ~ ~~ ~ o° 2I x .z I ~'~ LINE TABLE # L6NGTIi HEARING L» 2 : t' ~ 'at'W LJJ ' L J4 t 4.64' soaras'22'w . U5 L J6 t L17 ue Ll9 ~ ' LZO La, Lea. ~• • L2J ~ ' .Lao Las t •sa'~a'w Lab • L?~ ss' 'w caa s. [29 L.70 'yy [3l 3 " ~ LJ2 LJJ ' L.x • L.3I5 3 L36 L37 L.lB • L.)9 L40 ' I ~ L2.~ ~ N - i I N89'.74 :~8'~Y~ ~/~" 65.15' `~ c,27 ~ L37~ I L.37J I I L21 L25 [29 I I ~' I Imo. ~ N v „ ~I l~ -,~~ ~.I ~h ~ ~ of Iry O '~I Io° O /5 aW ~ ~ I ~ ,,I I~ zo' •~---~- ~I I,a yip ~ s ~ 7' soo 2s 22 "fai Z I I p' ,~ ~~ ~5i..36' ~' o • h pL39 I 589:34 ;38 £ ~ er L32 :v I ~ _ 145 49' L 18 v ' L>6 ~ L75 ~ v ~ N89:19 ;3B?~Y 158.55' ~lj ' ~ N002522 E a L J3 ~ I,W L 11 PHASE 1 .3.J o9' I N89 ;3'4 ;38'ttY ~+ ;~ s 63.71' ~~ POINT OF COMMENCEMENT EAST McMILLAN ROAD so ~ ~ 2s 39 32 ~ ____. N89'42'28"W 485.46' ~ - PRCA7f 5 ~~ ~ EXHIBIT 'B' FOR ~, ,~-~ WO(3DLAND SPRINGS StlB. ~ ''-a°' f oF~ i SEWER & WATER UTILITY EASEMENT ~ ~ PLS 10782 ~~.. ~~~~ ~,~.~,m. ~t, ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ , i ~ ~ D~twel ~I ~ I I II ~ ~ 1 7 ?i ~ ~ } ~ . ~ a F i S ` I ~~ .~ '' I ~ 1 ~ ~ 3 ~ rfa ~ p` ! ' t ~ ~ ~ 1fi ~ F ~ ~ t F 1 ~ i S ~S I 6 ~~ ` ~. k~y ~ ' I ~! ~ ~ (( f ~ ~ ~ a t ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~MpI~ ~~ ; 1144 S ~ ~~ 1 ~ ~. ~ £~ t. i 4 I , I ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 I ~ ~~ F~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ t t ~ t, % % ` Y I ~,. C ~ ~ i ~ n ~ 1 '. I 9 t a r ~` t e ~ ~ ' a ~ ~ I '~ e ! 9 ~f ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'i ` i ~' ~ a r '_ ~ s ,~ ~z ~~ ~ ~ r ' ' i ~ { ~ ~ ., i ~ ~~ : ~ ~ ~ K ~1~ ! t ~ ~.i; ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ a E ~i. `x3' t ~ { ` 'a I; sk C. L ~ r5 ~ ~~:'? ,.` # ~~~ r : I t y t is City of Meridian Public Works Dept. ~~~~~:. JUi~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ To: Mayor De Weerd & City Council ~ ;~t j w`~f ~~~~~~ Fr9om: Kar+e Glenn ~i~°~ ~l~rk ~i~aYc~ CC: Fle Date: 6/10/2008 Re: Proposed Agenda Items for 6117/08 City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following items be placed on the 6/17/08 City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration: 1) Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Woodland Sorinas. Typical Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement. Recommended Council Action: Approve the Sanitary Sewer and Water Main F~sement for Woodland Springs and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest. Thank you for your consideration. • Page 1 ~+. <~~~ v h 4; ~` f ~ ~ f- ~ i9 _ i f ~S t 'ti. ~1i 4 ~ ~, ~~ 1 S f I ( C 1 1 ` ! { 11 . C. 1 _. ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ yy { ~ ~ ~ ~ $f- [ ! 3 4 ~ : ~ ; ~ YYY S ~ l IIII r ~ `~ ~ ~ S ~! t ~, e 33a.. ~ if i f' ~ I~ }. I ~ ~~ ; i ; ~~ s~ , ~ y ., ~ t j i ;. . r - ~~ ~ } ~,. ~ u ~ -~ Y t,n ~~ r ! 1 <'- ~ . 4' { 1 ~~: i ~-}i ~;C ~ S a ~'~ ~ e4d f I 5 a1 't ~', f ~ , I ~ ~, ~ , - ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~:~ 4 ~ ~r9 i ` ~ ~ :~' ~ ~' i ~~ ~ , ~r ~ ~ i ~ t i X ~. ~ ') i ~' 1 yi 3 1~ t_ ~ " ~ t,~ l ~ i ,i- ~: ~ a ~' ' ~ ~ ; ~ ; 4> _ . i I ~ ,'~ _; ~ f ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • y }4 ~ ~ f t ~` ~ ~ ~ s~ s t !~ ~`h d i ~ ,~ i_F r (( t t.'~ F s Z ~ ~ ~{ ~ ~~ b 4~H' 1 r. ~ s ! •~ i:+ ~ ? f ~ 4~, it ~~~ ', ~~i~ ~ ~ ;~ !'@ r. • • SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this ~ day of ~S~ 20~between L~ (~cQ Sr~'~no5 LLG the party of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantor, and the City of Meridian Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of--way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of--way for an easement for the aperation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of--way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the azea of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. !: 9 S i Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement h; y q .i ~ .~ ~ I ` r i 11 i ~ ~' ~ 9' i w { t G, i i I'I. C07175 Sewer and Water Easements 060208.doc ~ ' ~ .ii 3 k J ~ ~ ~ ~~r I' ~ }; r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t, . ~ } i E ~ ~ ~, x ;` Y I ~` ~ j •3 ~1 ~ .~ ~ " t ~ ~ ' ~; C ~ j '~ ~ < ' ~;; t .I ~~ r ,:f r! ~ ~ ~r~ ' ~ ~~ a < '_ i f ~ ~i r r { ~ i, i' ~ c } ~, ~ a ~ THE GRANTOR hereby covenant and agrees that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the azea described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR hereby covenant and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of--way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of--way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they aze lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. G Matt Morgan Member STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this Z day of ~t 9/7~ , 204, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared cc, known or identified to me to be the member, respectively, of the limite liability company that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such limited liability company executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and yeaz fist above written. -~tNY !. ..raa~,. N! ?~R~ O s ~ ~~ ~ p~ Gei.IC ,: ., '~ A Sanitary Sewer ~fM~ t~{ittet~ll~iain Easement ~'AI'.~9QF.' .. ~~ f (((Q k S I 777i ' ~. i '.; i ~ NOTARY UB C OR IDAHO Residing at: /`'i. Conunission Expires: ~(, C07175 Sewer and Water Easements 060208.doc ~d r~ ~, I ti r 3 ~ S ~~ ~~ i. ,: ~ ; tt 5 i } j ~s ~} } S , t (~ 1 1 ~ 1 1' , I t' ~ '~ i 3Q 0 S 4 ~ ~) ' ) ~~ 4 ~' f E ~ I ` ( 7 , ~ ~ r y ~~ t ~ v jjj ~'~ ~ j ~: ~ ~ ,~ ~~ ~i M x CITY OF MERIDIAN Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Jaycee Holman, City Clerk Approved by Council on STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss. County of Ada, ) On this day of ,20 ,before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and Jaycee Holman, known. to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Idaho and who subscribed their names to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. SEAL Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: My Commission Expires: ~ tl f~ r i , ~, t t i ~ r i # ~ r C ~.. ~' ~ . b ; t t ~ ~• ~ l ~. $ ~ ~ t i ~~ ~ :1 } ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S 1 ' i ~ j ~ i 4 _ • r,c._ ! ' ~ , ~ , ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ i% ' p ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~~ {: - 116 ~~~ ~ ~: 4 i' t ~Y' ~ f 4 ~ ~` }~ ~~~' ~'~ ~ t ~~ ~Fy ~ :i f ~ i 13' ' t :. f 3,~ Y c, - ~ i ~ 3 , . ~ ~ ` 1 1 C t~3 ~y~- f r ; ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ F (4 } ~ 5 ~ e : t N CX ~ I~ r f ~ `~ f }} ~ ~ f ~ 3` i' t 4 ~ 1 *' ~~ ~; i ~. ~ ~ n ! 1 ~ sir i x ~ 2 4 ~ ~ Tsa i~ ~ ~ , ~ , a~ ~ i ~ ~ E i a • ~ ~ t `~ w ~ 1 ~ ~~~ a a~ ? if ~ i ~ ~ ~ Y ~ } 't 1 1 [ 7 '. } R: ~:. ! t ~ ! ~, ~_ a., ~' a 1p ~ 7. 332 N. Broadmore Way Nampa, ID 83687 Ph: (208) 442-b300 • Fax: (208) 466-0944 EXHIBIT `A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEWER AND WATER UTILITY EASEMENT FOR WOODLAND SPRINGS, LLC An Easement located in the SW 1/4 of the SW 1!4 of Section 29, Township 4 North. Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a brass crap monument marking the SW corner of said Section 29; From which an Aluminum Cap Monument marking the West Quarter Corner oi'said Section 29 Bears N 00°25'22" E 2652.16 Feet; Thence, along the West Line of said Section 29, N 00°25'22" E 428.15 Feet to a Point; Thence, leaving said West I,inc S 89°34'38" E 35.00 Feet to a 518 inch Iron Rod lying on or along the Easterly Right-of--Way of North Locust Grove Road, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence, S 89°34'38" F,, 294.35 Feet to a Point; Thence, S 00°25'22'' W 59.99 Feet to a Point; Thence, S 89°34'38" E 167.69 Feet to a Point; Thence, S 02°12'41'' W 172.$9 Feet to a 5/8 inch Iron Rod; Thence, N 89°34'38" W 15.01 Feet to a Point; Thence, N 02°12'41" E 140.87 Feet to a Point; Thence, N 89°34'38" W 34.79 Feet to a Point; Thence, S 00°25'22" W 9.99 Feet to a Point; Thence, N 89°34'38" W 10.00 Feet to a Point; Thence, N 00°25'22" E 9.99 Feet to a Point; Thence, N 89°34'38" W 55.19 Feet to a Point; Thence, S 00°25'22" W 9.99 Feet to a Paint; Thence, N 89°34'38" W 10.00 Feet to a Point; •Thence, N 00°25'22" E 9.99 Feet to a Point; • Thence, N 89°34'38'' W 19.66 Feet to a Point; •Thence, S 00°25'22'' W 4.99 Feet to a Point; • Thence, N 89°34'38" W 10.00 Feet to a Point; 'Thence, N 00°25'22'' E 9.99 Feet to a Point; Thence, N 89°34'38" W 65.15 Feet to a Point; •Thence, S 00°25'22" W 109.13 Feet to a Point; •Thence, S 44°34'38" E 19.10 Feet to a Point; I.:Wrojcct PiI~s~C07I75lSurvc~•U.NGAI. pGSCRIPTIONS~Scuer-Water Utility Easement 5-29-08 ali.d°c Page I of3 -Thence, S 00°25'22" W 51.36 Feet to a Point; -Thence, S 89°34'38" E, 145.49 Feet to a Point; -Thence, S 00°25'22" W 33.09 Feet to a Point: -Thence, S 89°34'38" E 11.54 Feet to a Point; -Thence, N 00°25'22" E 14.64 Feet to a Point; -Thence, S 89°34'38" E 10.(10 Feet to a Point; -Thence, S 00°25'22" W 14.64 Feet to a Point; .Thence, S 89°34'38" E 22.79 Feet to a Point; .Thence, S 02°12'41" W 20.01 Feet to a Point: -Thence, N 89°34'38" W 63.71 Feet to a Point: -Thence, N 00°25'22" E 33.09 Feet to a Point; Thence, N 89°34'38'' W 158.55 Feet to a Point; -Thence, N 00°25'22" E l 3.39 Feet to a Point; -Thence. S 89°34'38" E 13.06 Feet to a Point; Thence, N 00°25'22" E 49.68 Feet to a Point; Thence, N 44°34'38'' W 19.10 Feet to a Point; -Thence, N 00°25'22" E 117.41 Feet to a Point; •7'l~ence, N 89°34'38" W 11.00 Feet to a Point; -Thence, N 00°25'22" F., 62.00 Feet to a Point; • Thence. N 89°34'38" W 181.70 Feet to a Point: •7'hence, S 00°25'22" W 13.30 Feet to a Point; ~7'hence, N 89°34'38'' W 10.00 Feet to a Point; -Thence, N 00°25'22" E 13.30 Feet to a Point; -Thence, N 89°34'38" W 18.55 Feet to a Point; -Thence, N 00°25'22" E 30.00 Feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said above described Easement encompasses 30,708 Sq. Ft. or 0.705 Acres, more or less. k~g'~' ~~G13T~~O i ° ~3 7ac~ :~ 1.:1Projecl Fi1csK'071751SurveyU.EGAI. UIiSCRIPTIONS~.Setrer-Water Uliliry" 1•:as~mcnt 5-29A8 [3fi.doc Page 2 of3 ~ ( < C i ~~ , p~' '~ ~ it ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ .e. ~ t_ ~- ~ i ( l1 s ~ r ~;'" ` ~ 3 ~f z ~'. ~ '~'~ ~ {~ ~ ; i s c {! ; a. ; ~~ ~~ , - ~ ~ r-. 1 r C ~ ~, ~ t ~~ ~c ~ ~. c `~' _li ~ ~~ f ~1 ~i, -, ~ T g, 7 ~ i ~ j 1 ~ ~ • S ~ ~ µ ~ p ~~ . ~ 1 i ; . ,, , E. , .~ ~ , ; ~, S .,R ; ; , ~, ~ I y i ~ ~ t 3 C~ i J? ~i 3 ~ i @ i $i °~ l'~ { I ¢ ~ 4 t N ~ i ~ %~' l~ >~ . ~1 i~ ~ f ~ S~ ~ pf ~ ~ ~ ':1 3 - ;, . L ~ ~~ ~~ ~ tt ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ { 1 ~ $,; i .~ ~ ~ s ~ tom ~: I~ `~~ ! ~ ~f } Ji ~ , ~. ` . 4 1 L i ~ 3 ` ! { ~ !' 3 F Y. 1 E ~ ~ 1 - Et ~It j, ~ y, ~y i r ~ Y S d r 1 i~ ~ ~ o ~ ~7 ~ Z 'd t~0 ~W N Lv ~~ O N N ,...., N ~~ Z W 1 4 ~ PL 30. • 29 PLS 12220 Co - -' -- - - PLS 10782 i ~ l~~ ~~, ~ ; SEWER & WATER Z.I'TILITY~ EASEMENT t A PORTION OF THE SW U4 OF THE SW 114 OF SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COLIN'I'Y', IbAHO 2008 1 FUTURE PHASE 40' 20' 0 40' 80' i ~ S89'34'38"E SCALE: i° = 80' j 35.00' J POINT OF BEGINMNG + i ? _ _ _ S89:94 ;98 £ 294.35' s NQ fL33 __..------ ------~,~~, 'vp~. _______ ~ ,n~i~ nom, ~ " ~ N89'34 38'7ti 187.7D' ,4,~ ~ . . ^~ I = ~ j L.35 v p -n~i ~p ~ 589:94 ;38 E' J67 69' V i I q O a O N ~ ~ I N ~' f W I -~ N ~ ' ~7 1 O ~ I Ar r O ` z I j 1 t LINE TABLE # LENGTH SEARING LlJ 2001' 1 "W L JJ 22.79' S89' 4'38 LJ4 4. 4' '22'W L15 ~ t J6 g' L J7 ue J9 L20 taJ f us L2J , [24 g t25 ~~ t2ff [27 N89.34' tie • S' 2 ca9 ~• tJ0 500'2 ' `Mt LJJ ~• 1N LJ? LJJ tae LJS [Jff LJ7 cJe LJ9 L40 ~ h ~ ni ~b _ . _' L23 ~ ~ - - - - • • N89 :94 ;98'~Y~ 65.15' 27 ~ L31~ ~ L37J I I ~ I L2T L25 L29 0 v ~ ~ l I~ ~' i~ V'I H` Iry `~ N ~ O pt " 41 ~~ '~''~~ ~~ O >5' ~ ~ 20=-~-J~ ~~ ~~ ~y~ `r" SD025 22 ~ ? ~ ~ 51 36' ~~ . O N ~ 139 ~ ~ S89 34 :98 E 145.49 _ ~ L 18 ,,, L32 O ~ v - ~ LI6 • cT5 b y N89:94 38'Iv ' _, ~ ' ~ 158.55 ~ T j •. NOD'25 22 E ~ L 11 I PHASE 1 L >3 33. D9' cy ~a N89;94 :98'~Y ~ 63 71 ' " ry • ~ O POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ~ • ~~ -_.~ ~~~"' 30 • • 2s EAST McMILLAN ROAD 37 32 ____ N89'12'28"W 485.46' `.. -'~.;~ PLS 10782 P ~i1isN0' EXHIBIT 'B' FOR _ WOODLAND SPRINGS SZIB. .~ 1 oFE i SEyPER & WATER UTILITY EASEMENT °"~'" °" "'~°~ ~"° "`° '""' M~ouuV ~ m s~ w mu~o ,.....,a. _ srrr,,E so~ec~n ' t ~: ~.y r ~. .A7i :3 G ~ ' :. F ~R~i ~ ~' q ~ ~. S ~ i~ 'i~~ e A .. it ;d s;:. ~ ~ i:' i ~ ;~ ~ ~ g~` . ,_ ~ ~ ':. a. z . a::'~y~ s q.. Sw '~~ f, S. ' . , ;,.s ~ ` ~ . ~. t ~ j f. ~ .>." 55 ij ~ ~. t 'n ye. ~~ 11 I 1 'i t ~ ~ t((1: ',ir '~ t June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-.I REQUEST Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Agreement for Southeast Comer Marketplace No. 2 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. t~ ^ww~ 5 j t t } r t 1~ i _ ~ . 15 'K~ - la a ~F c t e ~ f~ ~ ~ s i ,~~F ; <j~ ~ 1' : ~ r ~ 4 I a ~' ,.. t ~ ~ ~~ ' ~ ~' ,~t i 3 ~ ', ~' j ~ ~ ~ , ~ 3. i a j ~~ ' i~ ~ i~ I T ~ I '7 11 ~ ~ !' ! ~ ~ F C qq F a E ~ F 1 1 9 r fi i~ 1 ~j 1,'. _ j I' ~; 1 ~ s ~ ~~ E _. . ~ al ~ ,t ,. ii. ;- '. ~ t a . t r ~ ~ "~ ~ ~ _ ; ` ~ t ~ ~., S ? ~. 3 '; ~~I S k ~ tit P ~ ~. - 1. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~' ~~~ ~~f,~' ~ #k 7 ,~F„ti ~ ~_ P ~ 3? ~ {L~ {~ 1 I ~ ~ ~!. EEE 1 h' 1~ 3 COMMENTS See atFached -~- ~" I~l`~" ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. D~NAVARRO AMOUNT .DO , 16 BOISE IDAHO 07102105 12:45 ~ DEPUTY Vicki Allen RECORDED-REnuEST of ILI IIIIIIIIIIIIIIILIIIIIILIIIII III I j City of Meridian 108076614 i SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made tlis r ~ day of June, 2008 between Prime A Investments, L.L.C., a Delawaze limited liability company, the party of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantor, and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantor desire to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of--way across the premises and property hereinafter pazticulazly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, 'T'HEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of--way for ati easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of--way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the azea of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Meridian, ID -Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Easement I I 1 ~ L .~ ~ p. ~1 C h ~~ i ~ ~ ~ f G ~ ; t I ; ~ ~ i ; j ~ ~ f ` ~ ' F i , ~ 1i ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~'r ' I+ F 3 ~ 3. L ~ ' 1 ` i4 t ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ 2 ,~ ~x V 'I f ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ , ~_ ~ t r f ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ k 4 ~ ~ Y ' ~ I ! f 1 ~ f `t - ~ E , f ( ~ s 1 I ~ ~F 1 1 G ~ s ` ~ } ~ ~ ~ s [; ~~ ~ ~ E P i t ~,. E I t i s t~ ~ ~ I ' i I ts 1 ~ ~ ~ p < ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e, ' ~ ' % ' ~ I ~I ~. ~ ~ ~•, S ~S ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ .~ , ~ ~ . ' ~ ' ~ ~ . I i Y L'.. t Y I ~ ' t •. r. 6 t 1 ~. $ k . f 3 1 ~ C: ~ ji ~~ ~ ~ ; L 7 . • • THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRAN'T'OR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of--way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of--way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: ~~L.c,~ ~~~~ Prem Ready, M.D., Manager STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUN`T'Y OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss On this day of June, 2008, before me, the undersigne Public in and for said State, personally appeared Prem Reddy, M.D., known or id i o me to be the Manager of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and ~tr edged to me that such corporation executed the same. pv~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, T have he first above written. v~'~ }~~ s~ .~~iv hand and affixed my official seal the day and year NOTARY PUBLIC FOR CALIFORNIA Residing at: Commission Expires: Meridian, ITS -Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Easement f ~~~ ~ F{ ~ 1 C ~. ~ i ~ a ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~jt ~ P t~- 3 F 1 , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I Y- ~ ~ 3a ~ ~~ I F@ 1` 1. iii ~- 1 ~~I '' yl ~ ~' ~ ~ i i` E f ~ 3 1 ~r.; ~~1 I 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ 11 ~, ~ ~ F i i 1~ 'f ~ ' ~ 1 f~ ~~ 1, ~ ~ ; s r~ F x ? ~ Y 1 ~ ~ s ~ ( ~ p ~ .. ~` ~ ~ ~ t ~' i 1 i }~. ~t ~ ~ ~~ r t ~ ' , ~~ ~ f~~ ~ ~ I ; ~ ~ 41 ~ f . 1 ~~ 1 ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ i f ~ ' ~ ~ 1 ~ In 1~ ~ ~ ~ e I . ~ 0.j ~~ ~r , 1 - k i ~ ~ 1' a E y r~ ~ } ;1 ( ~' , ~ ~ ~ i ~~1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 n , ;i ~ ~ ~ s ~~ ~~ Y r ~ rt. ~ I ~ . , ~f of ~ M i ~ ~ if ~ ~ ~ ,~; 1 ~ ~ ~ j t. ~ y ~ • GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Tammy de Weerd, Attest by J~j4cee Holman, City Clerk Approved By City Council On: ```~~~~~~uun~Nlliiiii .y~'. ., ~~ ~oa ~~~ '~~ _ '~~- -c~ r ~„~ s STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) .~ ~i1e~ On this ~~ day of 1l4ey, 2008, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared TAIVIlVIY DE WEERD and JAYCEE HOLMAN, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. TN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. .•' S. ~ `G~' ~''1 O ~~y (SEAL) ; ~~ ~~ NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO • Residing at: ~ l aP l , 1 C~ . ~ . :~~, ,~ ;~ ~ Commission Expires.: ~~"~ t'l 1 - ~. •.~ ~iDA~.••~ Meridian, ID -Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Easement ~~.~ ~. ISO ~', r ~ ! ~ ~, ~F f j f ~ 1 ~ it ! 3s ~~ ~ t # x ~ ;; ~ ;' - r ~~. ~ :Y ~~ t ~ ~ ! ~ i ° ~ ~c~, ~ ¢; t ~ i !, a ~. e 1 q' ~. ~~ .~: . lc~ ~ ~ .A ~ ~ 't ~ A l tz ~' y w1 ~ ~ ~" - ~ r` ~ ~ f sue-. '~ ~ '~~ a ~~ ;~i ~~ I ~ 1 ;~~ ~` I'i ~- r . ~ ~ ~_ ii~ j ~ ~ ~ 3 .. ~ . ~t i ~ ~ a 'c ~ [ s r ~ s j ~ ~ r ~=~ { R i i ~ i4 s ~! a ~ ~ S ! ~ Jr ra ~ `l ~ ~ i ~' ~~~~ ' i, sr j; d ~ ~~ ~ ~ _ r ~ ~ rr ~ ~ ~ _~ S. q 1 ,~ ~ 7 . 1 ,~ ~ II ~ ~ i i '~` f~ i~ ~ ; ~ ! t 3 ~ ~ z at' ~ ~ , ', ~ ! ~ f i 4 '3 CALIFORNIIA ALL-P~JRPOSE ACKI~IOWLE~Dt1iMEltIT State of California County of ~ n ~ Q f n ~' ~ 4v~a• On ~ ~~ 3 '~ 8 before me, _ 1 " ~ 0 N ~ ~ ~ ~-~-` L L Date Here Insect Name and TI9e of-the OANicner personally appeared ~'fi Q~ ~~ ~ ~ I~ ~ •~ . f!a*ONA M. t Oonnf 1t~779 fPubYa • CcN~omM simml~t~no Caadl- NpCamm. Ea~S.Ad Z2. who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory stridence to be the person whose namel~~re~ subscribed to the within instru . ent and acknowledged to me that ~~~ executed the same in rs ec/3geic,authorized capacity(i~, and that by ~terfMteit' signature~lj on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person f,~ acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS m and ffi ' I seal. ti P~ Notary seal At,ove Signature ' si re e P 9+~+ OPTIONAL Tlfough the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fiaudu/ent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: _ r~wa n ~~f `•1 S Q' w~c °L ^ ~ ~ ~~ Document Date: lt~~, 3 _ ~ ~ Number of Pag@s: ~,-,A 2 Q.~,s~ \ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: ~1 fl ~ ti Capacity(ies) Claimed bynS_igtner(s) Signer's Nam@: l 'rQ ~ l~ ~'1 M. ~ . Signer's Name: D individual ^ Individual ^ Corporate Officer -Title(s): D Corporate Officer -Title(s): D Partner - ^ Limited D General • ^ Partner - ^ Limited ^ General ^ Attorney in Fact • i ~ . ~ ^ Attorney in Fact • ~ -~ ^ Trust@@ Top of thumb here ^ Trustee Top of thumb here D Guardian or Conservatpr D Guardian or Conservator ~Other:~.~J~ Pr C7 ~~-- ^ Other: Signer Is Repr@senfing: Signer Is R@pr•@senting: ®2007 Natlonal Notary Association •9350 Oe Soto Ave, P.O.Box 2402 • thatsu~rtli, CA 91313.2402• wuvw.Nador~eWotaryorg [tam @5907 Reorder: CepTO~-Free 1~87ti-8827 Rion ~T of ILO 7 ~ F' o i' c4 (;'J' ~+ ~ I i ;~ I ~~ i (?: `i. i! ~ Jr f~ ~ e I ~{ i ~ ~ ,' i t ~ ~ ~. .~ ~J E~~IT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Meridian, ID -Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Easement j;~ ~ 1"r. r ~t ~ a f~ ~~ ~;' ~ f.. ~'. ~ 3, ~~. ~- ~ ~i. i~' ~ ~;: ~~' IE; 9 j~, k ;; 3 ~ ~ ~ ~'. f ~ t. F ~ ' i ~ i ' ' i ~ ~ ~ ~ f d. ~ ~ F 3 ~ ' y . } F k ~ , ~ ! a @i i ~ ~ ~ a ( ~ ~ . ~ ~., ~ ~' ~ ~ Y ~ t ~ i x~ ) ~ t j i 7 f 1 ~, S: 71~ u ii ~, ~ z '~ 1 R _, ~~ '~ i1 ~ ~ f ~" ~ ~F ~ tS ~ ! ~ _.3 ~,1 if t i { 1 .~ ~ . ~ ! 1 3F ~ t ~~ r ; E.~ _;'~ ~ it ~ ~~ i; s ,' '~ } ~ "3 i~ i si: j ~ ;. }~ _t S. .. T .~ s+ ~'f i 1 I ? FOX Land surveys, /nc. 1515 South Shonhono St, a Boise, Idaho a 83703 a 208-342-7857 ©208-342.7437 FAX DESCRIPTION FOR A SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT (PHASE 2) A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST'/4 OF SEC710N 4, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO A Portion .of the Northwest'/4 of Section 4, Tovmship 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows; COMMENCING at a found Brass Cap Monument marking the Northwest comer of Section 4, from which a found Brass Cap Monument marking the North % Comer thereof bears South 89°49'08° East, a distance of 2,659.38 feet; 1. thence along the Westerly boundary of Section 4, South 00°38'13° West, a d'IStance of 1116.00 feet to a point; 2. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 283.55 feet to the TRUE POINT ot= BEGINNING; 3. thence North 00°57'07° East, a distance of 44.82 feet to an angle point; 4. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 18.85 feet to an angle point; 5. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 19.98 feet to an angle point; 6. thence South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 18,52 feet to an angle point; 7. thence North 00°57'07° Eas#, a distance of 207.53 feet to an angle point; 8. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 15.26 feet to an angle point; 9. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 10. thence South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 15.50 feet to an angle point; 11. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 50.27 feat to an angle point; 12. 13. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 64.52 feet to an angle point; thence South 01°50'20° West, a distance of 9.00 feet to an angle point; „_~ c ~, ..~ ~ ~ r ~ ,! ~: ± ' ~ ~ 'I ~ ~~ 'r~ ~ ~j ,I ~ t_ al '. i j ~' ' I. j t. ' 1 Y ~ ~ ~} S . 1 1 1 t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i' { { f ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ Z ~ s : i ~j ~ ~ ' 11 ~ . ~' t i ~ 11 ~ ~. f { ~ .1 ~ M I r ,~ c ~ ` , ~, i ~`; ~, ~i ~~ ~ ! ~ r~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~' t ~~ 1 r ~ , ?€ ~ r t. ~~ A 2 ~,, '; i.~ x '~ i t yL~~ ~ r ~ i t t 4 f C~ t~ ~. {~~ {: S F ~ [ e t' ~ i ~r ~ ~~ t • 14. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 20.00 fee# to an angle point; 15. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 29.00 feet to an angle point; 16. thence South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 84.52 feet to an angle point; 17. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 196.13 feet to an angle point; 18. thence North 21°51'07° East, a distance of 125.37 feet to an angle point; 19. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 112.96 feet to an angle point; 20. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 21. thence South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 120.24 feet to an angle point; 22. thence North 21°51'07° East, a distance of 78.18 feet to an angle poirrt; 23. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 153.68 feet to an angle point; 24. thence North 01°51'08° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 25. thence South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 160.96 feet to an angle point; 26. thence North 21°51'07° East, a distance of 115.75 feet to an angle point; 27. thence North 00°10'25° West, a distance of 5.75 feet to an angle point; 28. thence North 89°48'42° West, a distance of 99.58 feet to an angle point; 29. thence North 00°11'18° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 30. thence South 89°48'42° East, a distance of 99.46 feet to an angle point; 31. thence North 00°10'25a West, a distance of 46.58 feet to an angle point; 32. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 17.71 feet iGo an angle point; 33. thence South 00°09'00° West, a distance of 1.61 feet to an angle point; 34. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 11.99 feet to an angle point; 35. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 15.00 feet to an angle point; .,- t ~ r t a ~; i ~ r ~ ` I t tr; t~~ ~ ~~ ~ i ~ 1~ k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ i ~ ~ f ~~ ,~ ~ ,. ` ~• a ;. ', ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ E ~ Eli z ; i ~ i ~. ~ ~, i ~~ , ; ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ 4 kr ~ a;~ ~ ~ t it ~ ! ! ~' ~ ~ ''~ w ~ .r `~ # K ~ _ ~ Y ~ t " I( S ~ ''~~ f 1. N .t 1 ~ ~ ~ f ~i i j t ~ s' h F 3 ' rl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ ` z p ~`~ F ~ ~ `~ f ~ ~ I t~l ~ ~ k ~ _~ l ~ r 3 r , r S ~ ~' # ~ ` ~ ! f f 1 .. ~1 t'~ 7d~ f ~ ~~ ~ i , ~ ~ 7: F ~ ~ •. I k . ~ ~ ~ _~ 36. thence: South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 3.00 feet to an angle point; 37. thence North 01°51'07a East, a distance of 6.35 feet to an angle point; 38. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 25.95 feet to an angle point; 39. thence North 00°10'25° West, a distance of 54.58 feet to an angle point; 40. thence North 87°17'10° East, a distance of 27.61 feet to an angle point; 41. thence North 42°43'35° East, a distance of 4.42 feet to an angle point; 42. thence South 00°08'29" East, a distance of 31.10 feet to an angle point; 43. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 1fi.49 feet to an angle point; 44. thence South 00°09'00° West, a distance of 29.00 feet to an angle point; 45. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 16.34 feet to an angle point; 46. thence South 00°08'29° East, a distance of 41.77 feet to an angle point; 47. thence South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 121.98 feet to an angle point; 48. thence North 01 °39'31 a East, a distance of 28.94 feet to an angle poirrt; 49. thence South 88°16'30° East, a distance of 29.24 feet to an angle point; 50. thence South 01°51'07° West, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 51. thence North 88°08'53p West, a distance of 9.17 feet to an angle point; 52. thence South 01°39'31° West, a distance of 9.00 feet to an~angle point; 53. thence South 88°08'53" East, a distance of 95.23 feet to an angle point; 54. thence South 01°51'07° West, a distance of 31.16 feet to an angle point; 55. thence South 88°01'47° East, a distance of 10.56 feet #o an angle point; 56. thence North 01°58'13° East, a distance of 9.00 feet to an angle point; 57. thence South 88°01'47° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 58. -thence South 01°58'13° West, a distance of 29.00 feet to an angle point; '~ i ~ ~' I ~~ ~ ~~ , . w~~ G: !„ ['; . ~ I t ~ ~. ; i ~ 'I t ~ ~ i . ' ~~ k~ ~I~ `~ Fl ~ ~ P E 6 i ~ 3 ~ ~~ 1~ 'I 3 ~ ~~~ i. ,f ~ - 'I , g_ ~ L~ ~ ~y ~ I '~ ~ i ~i ~ ~ ~ r t i ~ :~ ~ ~ ~ i ~-1 ~_ } ~ ~ ~ rf E e ' ~ ~ ; , ~ ~ ~ ~ y I i V µ 1 s v ~ ~ e i ~ ~ ~~ i ~ ~ 4 ~ (~ ~ ~!"~ '~ ' Ii ~ i I k ~ t ~ s. i r ' ; , i . ~ ~ > s i ~ ~F l { ~ ~ r ,~ y r ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~.it ~i i ~ ~~i~ ~ ~,~a E: ~~ ~ t 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80 l i' Fi, ~,- ~s, ~`; ~. thence North 88°01'47" West, a distance of 30.52 feet to an angle point; thence South 01°51'07° West, a distance of 108.34 feet to an angle point; thence South 88°08'53" East, a distance of 69.50 feet to an angle point; thence North 01°51'07" East, a distance of 8.00 feet to an angle point; thence South 88°08'53" East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; thence South 01°51'07" West, a distance of 8.00 feet #o an angle point; thence South 88°08'53" East, a distance of 55.21 feet to an angle point; thence South 00°35'00" West, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; thence North 88°08'53" West, a distance of 14.92 feet to an angle point; thence South 00°35'16° West, a distance of 159.62 feet to an angle point; thence South 89°25'00" East, a distance of 6.92 feet to an angle point; thence South 00°35'00" West, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; thence North 89°25'00" West, a distance of 6.93 feet to an angle poirit;~ thence South 00°35'16" West, a distance of 93.60 feet to an angle point; #hence Soutl~ 01°51'08" West, a distance of 1.50.82 feet to an angle point; thence South 89°24'44° East, a distance of 8.41 feet to an angle point; thence South 00°35'16" West, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; thence North 89°24'44° West, a distance of 8.85 feet to an angle point; thence South 01°51'08" West, a distance of 29.20 feet to an angle point; thence South 01°27'31° West, a distance of 158.26 feet to an angle point; thence South 89°24'44" East, a distance of 21.78 feet to an angle point; thence South 00°35'00" West, a distance of 26.11 feet to an angle point; 4. (:"! ~~ fi3 ~, ~ ( I 5 ~... S i I i ~~ ~ Z' i ; ~ ~ j f: . ~~ ~~ , ~ ' ~ t~ ~ ;: ~ if F ~ [ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ( i ~ ~ •~ ~ ~~ ~ e , . . ~~.. ~ , P ~ ! ~~ ~ ' t i' ~ i i • 81. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 42.24 feet to an angle point; 82. thence North 11°53'29° East, a distance of 0.28 feet to an angle point; 83. thence North 01 °27'31 ° East, a distance of 77.16 feet to an angle point; 84. thence North 88°32'29" West, a distance of 81.67 feet to an angle point; 85. thence South 01 °27'31 ° West, a distance of 9.07 feet to an angle point; 86. thence North 88°08'53" West, a distance of 20.13 feet to an angle point; 87. thence North 01°5i'07° East, a distance of 28.93 feet to an angle point; 88. thence South $8°32'29° East, a distance of 101.60 feet to an angle point; 89. thence North 01 °27'31 ° East, a distance of. 73.32 feet to an angle point; 90. thence North 89°51'00" West, a distance of 44.75 feet to an angle point; 91. thence North 00°09'00° East, a distance of 24.50 feet to an angle point; 92. thence South $9°51'00° East, a distance of -20.00 feet to an angle point; 93. thence South 00°09'00'° West, a distance of 4.50 feet to an angle point; 94. thence South 89°51'00'° East, a distance of 25.25 feet to an angle point; 95. thence North 01°51'08° East, a distance of 156.64 feet to an angle point; 96. thence North 89°.51'00° West, a distance of 27.35 feet to an angle point; 97. thence South 00°09'00° West, a distance of 4.50 feet to an angle point; 98. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 17.80 feet to an angle point; 99. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 24.51 feet to an angle point; 100. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 45.02 feet to an angle point; 101. thence North 01°51'08° East, a distance of 17.53 feet to an angle point; 102. thence North 00°35'16° East, a distance of 5.78 feet to an angle point; 1.03. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 21.67 feet to an angle point; PaBe~~ ~ i ~ I . ` ~ Sys Y i ~ ~ 1 l - jl ~ ~. ~ -,ta ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ I i' # Y ~j u~ 1 1 r ~ ~ ~ ~ t, ~ ~ 4 t ~ ,i . ~ ~ " ~ E 4 r i; ~ ~ ~ ' '~1 ` ~ e ~ t~ ' ~~ ~ 1' ~' ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~` '~ ~ ~ ~:; ~. r ~ . i ~ ~. ~~ ~ t f' 3 ~~ ~~ t ~~' ~ ~~ I~ ~ 3 ~ ~ _ ~ ~ t ~ s y n ~ ~ ~ e t-i' i ? ~ 1 SI ~i ~~ ~ xt ~ ~ {~ i ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ P I ~ ~ 1 I ~ ~ F ! ~'_ ~ ~ r ~ f~.7 x ~ ' ~ r I ~ ~ r ;~ d'& f. << ~ i i 1 i I ~ {;.t ~ pF [ 7Su 104. thence North 00°09'OOa East, a distance of 29.00 feet to an angle point; 105. thence South 89°51'00" East, a distance of 21.89 feet to an angle point; 1.06. thence North 00°35'16° East, a distance of 149.12 feet to an angle point; 107. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 22.46 feet to an angle point; 108. thence North 00°09'00° East, a distance of 29.00 feet to an angle point; 109. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 22.68 feet to an angle point; 110. thence North 00°35'16° East, a distance of 60.54 feet to an angle point; 111. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 130.23 feet to an angle point; 112. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 147.50 feet to an angle point; 113. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 95.50 feet to an angle point; 114. thence South 01°51'07° West, a distance of 10.50 feet to an angle point; 115. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 11fi. thence North 01°51'07" East, a distance of 10.50 feet to an angle poirrt; 117. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 100.59 feet to an angle point; 118. thence South 00°08'29° East, a distance of 27.42 feet to an angle point; 119. thence South 21°51'07° West, a .distance of 305.08 feet to an angle point; 120. thence South 35°56'02° East, a distance of 26.70 feet to an angle point; 121. thence Soutl~ 88°08'53° East, a distance of 168.98 feet to an angle point; 122. thence North 01°51'07° East, a dis#anoe of 8.96 feet to an angle point; 123. thence South 88°08'53" East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 124. thence South 01°51'07° West, a distance of 28.96 feet to an angle point; 125. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of ?20.30 feet to an angle point; {1 r 6' ~, ! ~, R 4., !, {~ t ~` K I ~ i +i ~~ ~: , i a ~Ii ~ j ~I ,. s~ ;. . ~ ~ ~ ~~ r i. ( ~ ~ hf ~ ~ ~ } ~; ~ S S ~ ~ 3 ~ I~ , a~._ r f ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ t F ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ gg ~~, ' ]iii , ~ ~ 1 ¢ ~ a '+, ~.~ ~ ~~ ~j ~ ~ f~ .~ ~' ff.'s I I f ~ ~ ~r} i s ~~ it , ~ 126. thence South 21°51'07" West, a distance of 9.64 feet to an angle point; 127. thence South 01°51'07" West, a distance of 235.75 feet to an angle point; 128. thence South 88°08'53" East, a distance of 203.50 feet to an angle point; 129. thence South 01°51'07" West, a distance of 52.52 feet to an angle point; 130. thence North 88°08'53" West, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 131. thence North 01°51'07" East, a distance of 32.52 feet to an angle point; 132. thence North 88°08'53" West, a distance of 183.50 feet to an angle point; 133. thence South 01°51'07" West, a distance of 103.49 feet to an angle point; 134. thence South 00°57'07" West, a distance of 95.72 feet to an angle point; 135. thence South 88°01'47" East, a distance of 13.52 feet to an angle point; 136. thence South 01°58'13" West, a distance of 29.00 feet to an angle point; 137. thence North 88°Oi'47" West, a distance of 13:01 feet to an angle point; 138. thence South 00°57'07" West, a distance of 33.69 feet to an angle poirrt; 139. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 22.98 feet to an angle poirrt; 140. thence South 00°09'00" West, a distance of 34.50 feet to an angle point; 141. thence North 89°51'00" West, a distance of 8.49 to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 88,773 square feet {2.037 acres) more or less. TOGETHER WITH: A Portion of the Northwest'/. of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly descrit~ed as follows; COMMENCING at a found Brass Cap Monument marking the Northwest comer of Secl~on 4, from which a found Brass Cap Monument marking the North '/ Comer thereof gears South 89°49'08" East, a distance of 2,659.38 feet; ~~~ ~ r i~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ x,: ~ ~ . I s ~1 - t } ,1 b ~ , d '3 i ~~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ l ~ .~ ~ ~~ ' ` ` s @ ~ ~ psi ~._ t ~ ~ ~ ; ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ti ,~ 3 5 S C 1 _ . 1M1M1 f [ t k .' ~ l ~ S E t E E Y L ~ 1 . ; f ~•.. ~ ~ ~; ` v ~ ,,t ~ x ~~Z~a t e s ~ ~ 1 r~' "t ~ ~ ,~ 4 i ~ ~ ,R i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ F, 3 ~ .~ 1 ~' ~ • 142. thence along the Westerly boundary of Section 4, South 00°36'13" West, a distance of 1116.00 feet #o a point; 143. thence South 89°51'00" East, a distance of 191.14 feet to the TRUE POINT OF ~iEGiNNING; 144. thence North 00°09'00" East, a distance of 8.87 feet to an angle point; 145. thence South 89°51'00" East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 14fi. thence South 00°09'00" West, a distance of 8.87 feet to an angle point; 147. thence North 89°51'00" West, a distance of 20.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 177 square feet (0.004 acres) more or less. Subject to existing easements and rights-of-way as any may e~dst, of nrcord or not of record. Todd Waite, PLS 4999 END OF DESCRIPTION TJF:taj W:IPROJECfS~2007107-033.PR]1PROJEC'11DESCIt1P770NS1733SSH2ODESC PH2.DOC a~13 ~11Z y~. ' L ~ ~ { ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ , ~ t ~ ~ ~~ ~~r ~ 4 1 r,.. ~} ~ 5 o- V 111 ~ t ~ ~ ~ ' t : i ~ i ~ ~ a f ~ : ~ '' r ' 111 ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1_, ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ f~ ~4 i ( r i , 7j [ i 5 1: 4.. - 4 f 1 ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ A l> p . 4 ~! f ~ ~ Y 1 ` r. f 1 I~ 1: .. ~ ~' i ~a3. 1 . ~1 ~ i ~{ Y ~ F t, 1=k ~ t 4( t ' L ~~ 7 it } I : ~~' ~' ~ .. ~ f ~ ' s .~ 1 ' ~ 9 i ~ ~, ~ j a ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~'~ ~ ~ E.3" ' ~ t. ~j'~ t1 ~ ° - ~ f `+ g~g ~ f ' ~ ~' i t {' ~ ~ ~~~ t d~" i } is "ff ~ r 4~_ t ~ f; (. ~. qq . ~ i S ~ ~ ~ F F ~. , ~ ~~ e ~ ~ s' ~-. f _ ~, b t ; ~' ~ g;. t~ ~r. t ~ t ~ ;s ~~~ • ~ S; ~ ~ t t ~~ ~~ ~ A! ~ i~j j' ~+L~ ~ ~i y f ~ 4 • E :~ - S~~ S o ~ ~ ',~' ~ a ~ { 9 ~.~ {~ ~~ 7 rQ 777 L . . ) R t t ~ ~ {~. -1 i-{ (_ t ~ e tF f i~ :~. I S ~ 3 1 1. , ~t , 6' i ~. EXHIBIT B PLAT Meridian, ID -Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Easement ~ ... ~'' ~_. ~ ~" i> ~~ ~ y' F j,. t y: L ~r T ~ r ~~.~ ~~ i f iF` ~;;~ Y ~ S'. i I t i ~ ~ * ~ ~~ ~~ Y } ' ~ i ~ t ~ h ~ ~ : ii L v ~ ~_ `` ~ E~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ " .S: ~ q, ' , S ~ -i4 ~~ r t ', ~ ~ }f ~ y f ~ } ~ - ~ t ~ t i 7 ~ a T f ~ .~~ A~ , f~ ~ ~ ~~ i ' ~ . i,~i 3 ~ @@ ~~ ,~ t f ~: 1 r !y % fi ~ ' F f ' i [[[ ~ r} i 7f t 1 • { ~ ~ { ' '~ s 3 j' ~ ~ ~. ~ a R gr ~. i j ~ ~i 1. 'i { y fa y P ~ p y$ ~~ 4 ~~,H,: ( { ~ r. ~~ ~F 1! i 1 t i f r ~sr .. ~»>>>> ~L ~ i~~k -; ~-~ i ~t ( ~?r.. _ 's t- a~ ! ~i ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~._r s 9 . ~ ~~ { t W i i ' I l 1 ~ ~ 1, Y ~ s ,j ~ ~ ~ ~x j . ~ 4i i ~ ~~ ~ ~~. t a ?-~ .-. ~ ~ f _ a I J~ E , `, ?: : 'k xj t h§' (; ~` - q ; , ~ 3' ~ '~ ~ s ~ f ! f ' ~ ~ z, ,1 ~ ! , k f ~ ~ ~ '; ~ ~y :~ ~: t a vo•aali i ( ! ~- -- m ~ S ~ 1 ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~, N. EACsLg ROAD ~~~~ l ~ f~ w I I a ~~ I I { ; eq~sosrw +wdn / ..~~. 4r nimroen. 7tfJt3 ~ ZZ g ~y ~~ - = . yyf~~ _ ~w~-~' ~~~ T-- --~.~..-~-------- ~~ - --tom-~--• ~ ~~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ I~ ~ I 1 r 1 ~ f D z L . . I m~ I ~ ~~~~ o ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~s~ ~~ ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~F ~ gOa~ a ~~9~ 006 c~~~"~~6fii~~~~~~'~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~a~ ~$xp ~~ ~o ~ ~N~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~ og~~~ ~ ~~m ~~ Z~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ $~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ %~ Sa H ~6 ~~ ~~o $~ ~~ r y~'~'pp y 9 I 1 aors+aw nm~n ~~ _ ~~ aw~rrrwn~ --- -= r~= ~~ ~~ m ,, , a, m ~ i~ 1 ~ I1 ~ H I 1 ~~ pm b ~a 3~ ~>a ~~ D ~~~ ~~~ I Uf -`~ 10 1 ~' ~ ~ ~ o~~ ~~r ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ 1 ~ Cmg 1 rQ ~ A 11 1 1 i z "" e& e s ~ B m ~~ C n z m -~ m C v 0 z z 0 N ~~ H ~~~ ~ ~- ~ _ g ~• EAGLE RO _,./ ..,..~ _ - ~ . _ ~ ttteoo' " _ " _ _ A ki .~ AD ~~ I I~j ~~ vo•.0~ ill ~I' 1~ ~~I Ali '~ 1 ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ - ~ ~~ ~ ~~`"'~ ~ ~' o ~~' ~E ~~ ~ >~ >:m,r "` ~ ~S~ ,,,~~ A m I I I I I I l a 1 I O 1 ~~ 1 1 y ~~ I 1 L---d- ~~ i I r 1 I 11 I 1 I I ~1 ~1 1 1 1 ail ; 1 ~+ I ~Iq Q ~~ I ~ 3 ~ I I I A ~ s ;; ~ ~~ II ~I !+ ~/\A/\~ ~ 1~•i ~ V~~ v 0 0 ~~ ~~~ 0 0 ~... ... -$W ~.8 N~NRI-YI OmO~ W1 Wiff'LA77~ --------- ------ r----T-- ------ ----~ - -------- I I =j,-_ -- -- g ;I 1 1 ~ -- -- -_ ~ ------------ ~~' ~ s ~~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ O ~ i 1 m a I I a a m Im 1 r ~~ I I 1 1 I 1 ~~ oZ o 4 I N C ~~ ~°'DZ ow~m ~oo'~ ~ ~~oD ~~~~~ ~~~m ~~~5 Q ~m$m N C 0 z z 0 i ~ City of Meridian Public Works Dept. Memo To: Mayor De Weerd 8~ City Council From: Kane Glenn ti'.C: File Date: 6/11/2008 Re: Proposed Agenda Items for 6117/08 City Council Meeting ,~ b ,_, , _r~~~~~~ ~~~~1 `~it~r ~! .telex-icl ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~3.ce The Public Works Department respecxfully requests that the following items be placed on the 6/17108 City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration: 1) Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Southeast Comer Marketplace #2. Correction/Revision of legal description submitted by The Land Group. This legal description will replace the version that was previously presented to City Council on May 27, 2008. Recommended Council Action: Approve the Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Southeast Corner Marketplace #2 and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest. Thank you for your consideration. • Page 1 ~f i ~ ' i ~ V 1 > ~ t " ~ ~ ' ~ q ' I r 3 ~' I ' ~ + d~~ „ ~! ~ ~ ~ j ~ J~. ~ ~ ~ 4 tE ~ ' i ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ s 4 ~ I ' f ry E ~1 ~ ~ : ~ ~ ff t a'. 1 ~ i i~ ~ ~ f . A ; j, ~ € i I ~j ~ + ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~:s ' t ~j ~'. I ~ .~_ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ `! ,~ ~ ~ ~ t ~.t ~ ii ~ 3t I ~ . i ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ' .~ i ~~ i i ~ _ (f h i `~ 1 E ~ ~ ~. ~` S9 bhh t~ r ~' } ~ 2 t ~ I ~ j [[ ~ e ~ ~ ~ I F~ ~ ~ ~ e ,~ t. ~ ~! ~ ~ jj ~ ( ~ t ~ {' ~ r E k ~' ~ t r ~ ~ y ~ 3 ~ ~: J ` f ~ 1 ~ r ~ f_ , i -i: ~ ~~ I ~ . ~ ~ t 1 ~~ . E ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Lr ' ~ ~ S ~ ? i i ~ ~ ~ 4 ' ~~ 'r ` ~ ~ ~~ zr f: ~ ~ i ~ r t >i ~ ~ ~ G ,y' v {' { ~ ;1I i a ~ ~ S `5 `' ~ t ~ t i 4 r' • FOX Land Surveys, /arc. 1815 South Shoshone St. a Bolse~ Idaho a 83705 a 20&342-7957 a 208-342-7437 FAX .~ DESCRIPTION FOR A SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT (PHASE 2) A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST'/s OF SECTfON 4, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MEWDIAN, CITY OF MERMAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO A Portion of the Northwest % of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada Couniy, Idaho more particularly described as follows; COMMENCING at a found Brass Cap Monument marking the Northwest comer of Section 4, from which a found Brass Cap Monument martcing the North '/. Comer thereof bears South 89°49'08" East, a distance of 2,fi59.38 feet; 1. thence along the Westerly boundary of Section 4, South 00°36'13° West, a distance of 1196.(}0 feet to a point; 2. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 283.55 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; 3. thence North 00°57'07° East, a distance of 44.82 feet to an angle point; 4. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 18.85 feet to an angle point; 5. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 19.98 feet to an angle point; 6. thence South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 18.52 feet to an ang~ point; 7. thence North 00°57'07° East, a distance of 207.53 feet to an angle point; 8. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 15.26 feet to an angle point; 9. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 10. thence South 88°08'53" East, a distance of 15.50 feet to an angle point; 11. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 50.27 feet to an angle point; 12. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 64.52 feet to an angle point; 13. thence South 01°50'20° West, a distance of 9.00 feet to an angle point; I 1 j i L F . ~ ~ F x ~ : r x .j. ~ ;; t f ~ , , t I y i ~' '~ f ~ ` {{ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i _ ~ ~ if ~ ~ ~ ( is ~ = ~ 1 I i 3~ ~ ~ !f ~: ~ 5 ~~ k ~ ~ i ~ ; b ~ ~! i ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~, G ~ ~ ' 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ i ~ F ~~ , I ~ ,, I ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ it ~ : l ; i d` ( ~ z ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 1 ' 1 ~~ t ( ~ ~ i H ` .~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p -~ `` F ~ 1 ~ ~ j k ~ ttt SS ~ ~ ; ~ ~ , ~ ~ ;t f ~ ~ ; { ' ~ .~ ~ ~ E- , 5 ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ S k ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ i '~J I ~ ~ EE i * }- ~~ I ~ ~ i ~ -, -~ Ygt ~ P i I4 fi } .~ € f { ~ i ~`' ~ ~ ii ~: f 7 i 4 ~ ~ i # i ~ a ` ff y g 14. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 15. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 29.00 feet to an angle point; 16. thence South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 84.52 feet to an angle point; 17. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 196.13 feet to an angle point; 18. thence North 21°51'07° East, a distance of 125.37 feet to an angle point; 19. thence North 88°08'53° West, a d~tance of 112.96 feet to an angle point; 20. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 21. thence South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 120.24 feet to an angle point; 22. thence North 21°51'07° East, a distance of 78.18 feet to an angle point; 23. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 153.68 feet to an angle point; 24. thence North 01°51'08° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 25. thence South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 160.9fi feet to an angle point; 26. thence North 21°51'07° East, a distance of 115.75 feet to an angle point; 27. thence North 00°10'25° West, a distance of 5.75 feet to an angle point; 28. thence North 89°48'42° West, a distance of 99.58 feet to an angle point; 29. thence North 00°11'18° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 30. thence South 89°48'42° East, a distance of 99.46 feet to an angle point; 31. thence North 00°10'25° West, a distance of 46.58 feet to an angle point; 32. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 17.71 feet to an angle point; 33. thence South 00°09'00° West, a distance of 1.61 feet to an angle point; 34. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 11.99 feet to an angle. point; 35. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 15.00 feet to an angle point; o 36. thence South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 3.00 feet to an angle point; 37. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 6.35 feet to an angle point; 38. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 25.95 feet to an angle point; 39. thence North 00°10'25° West, a distance of 54.58 feet to an angle point; 40. thence North 87°17'10° East, a distance of 27.61 feet to an angle point; 41. thence North 42°43'35° East, a distance of 4.42 feet to an angle point; 42. thence South ~°08'29° East, a distance of 31.10 feet to an angle point; 43. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 16.49 feet to an angle point; 44. thence South 00°09'00° West, a distance of 29.00 feet to an angle point; 45. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 16.34 feet to an angle point; 46. thence South 00°08'29° East, a distance of 41.77 feet to an angle point; 47. thence South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 121.98 feet to an angle point; 48. thence North 01 °39'31 ° East, a distance of 28.94 feet to an angle point; 49. thence South 88°16'30° East, a distance of 29.24 feet to an ang~ point; 50. thence South 01°51'07° West, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 51. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 9.17 feet to an angle point; 52. thence South 01 °39'31 ° West, a distance of 9.00 feet to an angle poirrt; 53. thence South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 95.23 feet to an angle point; 54. thence South 01°51'07° West, a distance of 31.16 feet to an angle point; 55. thence South 88°01'47° East, a distance of 10.56 feet to an angle point; 56. thence North 01°58'13° East, a distance of 9.00 feet to an angle point; 57. thence South 88°01'47° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 58. thence South 01°58'13° West, a distance of 29.00 feet to an angle point; ., ~~sE r ~, ~" E F f • • 59. thence North 88°01'47" West, a distance of 30.52 feet to an angle point; 60. thence South 01°51'07" West, a distance of 108.34 feet to an angle point; 61. thence South 88°08'53" East, a distance of 69.50 feet to an angle point; 62. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 8.00 feet to an angle point; 63. thence South 88°08'53" East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 64. thence South 01°51'07" West, a distance of 8.00 feet to an angle point; 65. thence South 88°08'53" East, a distance of 55.21 feet to an angle point; 66. thence South 00°35'00" West, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 67. thence North 88°08'53" West, a distance of 14.92 feet to an angle point; 68. thence South 00°35'16" West, a distance of 159.62 feet to an angle point; 69. thence South 89°25'00" East, a distance of 6.92 feet to an angle point; 70. thence South 00°35'00" West, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 71. thence North 89°25'00" West, a distance of 6.93 feet to an angle point; 72. thence South 00°35'16" West, a distance of 93.60 feet to an angle point; 73. thence South 01°51'08" West, a distance of 150.82 feet to an angle poin#; 74, thence South 89°24'44° East, a distance of 8.41 feet to an angle point; 75. thence South 00°35'16" West, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 76. thence North 89°24'44" West, a distance of 8.85 feet to an angle point; 77. thence South 01°51'08" West, a distance of 29.20 feet to an angle point; 78. thence South 01 °27'31 ° West, a distance of 158.26 feet to an angle point; 79. thence South 89°24'44" East, a distance of 21.78 feet to an angle point; 80. thence South 00°35'00" West, a distance of 26.11 feet to an angle point; 1~ ~ ;q ~,.' ~'~ ~ ,, ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~' y I • 81. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 42.24 feet to an angle point; 82. thence North 11°53'29° East, a distance of 0.28 feet to an angle point; 83. thence North 01°27'31" East, a distance of 77.16 feet to an angle point; 84. thence North 88°32'29° West, a distance of 81.67 feet to an angle point; 85. thence South 01 °27'31 ° West, a distance of 9.07 feet to an angle point; 86. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 20.13 feet to an angle point; 87. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 28.93 feet to an angle point; 88. thence South 88°32'29° East, a distance of 101.60 feet to an angle point; 89. thence North 01°27'31" East, a distance of 73.32 feet to an angle point; 90. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 44.75 feet to an angle point; 91. thence North 00°09'00° East, a distance of 24.50 feet to an angle point; 92. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 93. thence South 00°09'00° West, a distance of 4.50 feet to an angle point; 94. thence South 89°51'00' East, a distance of 25.25 feet to an angle point; 95. thence North 01°51'08° East, a distance of 156.64 feet to an angle point; 96. thence North 89°51'00" West, a distance of 27.35 feet to an angle point; 97. thence South ~°09'00° West, a distance of 4.50 feet to an angle poirrt; 98. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 17.80 feet to an angle point; 99. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 24.51 feet to an angle point; 100. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 45.02 feet to an angle point; 101. thence North 01°51'08° East, a distance of 17.53 feet to an angle point; 102. thence North 00°35'16° East, a distance of 5.78 feet to an angle point; 103. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 21.67 feet to an angle point; ~~ n 3111) C L~yL i L '.' '~ ~, ( { ~ ~_. ~ it A Fi ~ ' ~ . ! ~ L 1 ~ )~ ~ iI ` i. I - a ~ ~ ~ ,' _ ~, ~C ~ ,j ' ~ ~~; r ,I: ~ ~ i ~ ~ w: ~ - ~ II 1 i 1 y ; F ~•S"~ j: i { rF ~ ; 4 y ~ ~ 1g ~ t € ~ i r i ~ t, ~~ ~ jF ~ f I._ 1 l j hT , ' > 1 ( ` # ,~ ~ ' r~ ' `~ ai ~ ~ ~t >> ~r , ~~ 3 ~ I ~" ~ ~` ~ i . [; ~ y f F~ ~ t ,+ l ~ tLL y ~ A k { _ 1 ~ ~ ~ l: 104. thence North 00°09'00° East, a distance of 29.00 feet to an angle point; 105. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 21.89 feet to an angle point; 106. thence North 00°35'16° East, a distance of 149.12 feet to an angle point; 107. thence North 89°51'00° West, a distance of 22.46 feet to an angle point; 108. thence North 00°09'00° East, a distance of 29.00 feet to an angle point; 109. thence South 89°51'00° East, a distance of 22.68 feet #o an angle point; 110. thence North 00°35'16° East, a distance of 60.54 feet to an angle point; 111. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 130.23 feet to an angle point; 112. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 147.50 feet to an angle point; 113. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 95.50 feet to an angle point; 114. thence South 01°51'07° West, a distance of 10.50 feet to an angle point; 115. thence North 88°08'53" West, a distance of 20.00 fee# to an angle point; 116. thence North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 10.50 feet to an angle point; 117. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 100.59 feet to an angle point; 118. thence South 00°08'29° East, a distance of 27.42 feet to an angle point; 119. thence South 21°51'07° West, a distance of 305.08 feet to an angle point; 120. thence South 35°56'02° East, a distance of 26.70 feet to an angle point; 121. thence South 88°08'53" East, a distance of 168.98 feet to an ang~ point; 122. therx~ North 01°51'07° East, a distance of 8.96 feet to an angle point; 123. thence South 88°08'53° East, a distance of 20.00 feet to an angle point; 124. thence South 01°51'07" West, a distance of 28.96 feet to an angle point; 125. thence North 88°08'53° West, a distance of 220.30 feet to an angle point; ~tw ~ ~~ ~`~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ is }' ' ~ ~ E, ~~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~: ~~: ~ ~;~.~ s ! ~,~ , i f: ~ " S . i ~ i ~ G ,a 5 ~~ ~ ~ 4 f'. ~; 1 ( ` f, e i I; i ~ [ ;i ' { F, ~ t I j f i t ~ ~ -.. '. .~ ~ 1, i 1 ' • June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-K REQUEST Agreement supporting Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Economic Development 1 Slum & Blight Project AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY See attached CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: ~- CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r , ~~ '~ ~ i ~~~~ ~{ k ~ ~~ ~, r ~ ~ , ~ g .~s ~s ~ g ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ,~~~ ~' fi ~' F r ~ ~~ ~~~ _~ , ~ ~~ , 4p E ,~ ~ r , ~~ ~ t , t 'r ~ ~ {. ~ j . ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ y ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ E~~ ~ i ' ~ I ~ '~ l i ~ ~ ~ , ~ ` ~ ~ {M{ ik e r ' b ~ r , , .. fi . ~~ + .; Otte ~ ~ ~ i d ~ r ~ fr ~i _ ~ ~ I f i 1 :~ '. ~ [ ~~ t' ~ ' j I i ~ i , , f ~ t ~, ; ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° 3 e i ~ i_z ~ I t~- _ q. b r~ ~ ~ ~ t i ~ ' =r ~ ~ ~~ , t~ ~ ~ ` } t~ s l ~ ~ ? ~ f ~ i' ~ t; + ~ _~ i3 ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ y ~ ~ i ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` 3 ' ~ 1 '~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ p ~' c 3; r. #;- ~ r I;~ ~ ~ i ~ r I ~ ~ _Ik q i rP S ~, ~ _~~ 1 it ~t p ~ L r ~. ~ ~~ i ~ '` F- ~ k r ~ 3 i f j ~ AGREEMENT between City of Meridian and Larry Beddes for Demolition of Buildings at 1535 N. Main St., Meridian, Idaho This Agreement is made this _ day of June, 2008, by and between the City of Meridian, Idaho, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("CITY"), and Larry Beddes, an individual property owner ("LARRY BEDDES"). WHEREAS, CITY is an Entitlement City for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") has allocated funds under its Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") program; WHEREAS, HUD has approved CITY's Program Year 2007 Action Plan which, inteY alia, plans for the CITY's investment of CDBG funds in clearing one lot and/or demolishing at least one substandard structure pursuant to 24 CFR § 570.201(d); WHEREAS, LARRY BEDDES owns parcel no. 86129020670, the street address of which is 1535 N. Main St., Meridian, Idaho ("SUBJECT PROPERTY"), and LARRY BEDDES also owns all buildings, structures, and concrete pads upon such parcel; WHEREAS, each and all of the buildings upon the SUBJECT PROPERTY have been found to be unsafe, insanitary, and/or hazardous to the public by, respectively, the Central District Health Department, City of Meridian Development Services, City of Meridian Fire Department, and City of Meridian Police Department; and WHEREAS, the buildings upon the SUBJECT PROPERTY, each and collectively, contribute to the area's deterioration due to their dilapidation, deterioration, age, obsolescence, conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, and the combination and effect of such factors, all of which is conducive to juvenile delinquency and crime and detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare; and WHEREAS, the demolition of the buildings at the SUBJECT PROPERTY will be mutually beneficial to CITY, to LARRY BEDDES, and to the Meridian community; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and mutual covenants, agreements, acknowledgments and inducements contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: I. PARTIES' RESPECTIVE DUTIES. A. Duties of CITY. 1. Demolition. CITY shall cause the demolition, clearance, removal, and disposal of each and every building, structure, and concrete pad located on the parcel at the SUBJECT PROPERTY, which work shall include the removal of any and all foundations, driveways, walkways, piping, debris, and/or portions thereof. F It PAGE 1 OF 9 ,a, ~. 1 '; ~! a d , :;: ;x k` . } ,~, ;~ l i i ,' i I i i • s 2. Compliance with laws. CITY shall ensure that the party undertaking such the demolition, clearance, removal, and disposal shall at all times do so in compliance with any and all applicable local, state, and/or federal laws and/or permitting procedures, including state and federal environmental and historic preservation regulations, bidding and procurement laws and regulations, HUD regulations, building and fire code provisions, public health ordinances and directives, and/or regulations for decontamination and disposal of demolition debris. 3. Utility disconnection. CITY shall ensure that utilities are disconnected from each and every structure prior to their demolition. 4. Costs of demolition. CITY shall be wholly responsible for costs related to the demolition, clearance, removal, and disposal of the buildings, structures, and concrete pads located at or on the SUBJECT PROPERTY. 5. Confidentiality. Subject to the timeline agreed to herein, CITY shall utilize best efforts to keep confidential any and all information regarding the demolition, clearance, removal, and/or disposal of the buildings, structures, and concrete pads located at or on the SUBJECT PROPERTY. 6. Notification of neighbors. Subject to the timeline agreed to herein, CITY shall notify neighboring property owners of the date(s) and time(s) at which the demolition shall occur. B. Duties of LARRY BEDDES. 1. Grant right of access and entry. LARRY BEDDES shall, and hereby ~``'~'~IA`' does, grant to CITY and its contractors, subcontractors, and/or agents the right of access and entry onto the premises of the SUBJECT PROPERTY for the purpose of demolition, clearance, removal, and disposal of each and every building, structure, and concrete pad located at or on the SUBJECT PROPERTY. ' 2. Grant permission to demolish, clear, remove, and dispose. LARRY IN"'AI' BEDDES shall, and hereby does, grant to CITY and its contractors, subcontractors, and/or agents permission to demolish, clear, remove, and dispose of each and every building, structure, and concrete pad and all portions and/or materials thereof located at or on the SUBJECT PROPERTY. 3. Removal of personal property. LARRY BEDDES shall remove all II''r'~I`°~' personal property and effects from the SUBJECT PROPERTY by 5:00 p.m. on August 1, 2008. AGREEMENT FOR DEMOLTfION OF BUII.DINGS PAGE 2 OF 9 1535 N. MAIN ST., MERIDIAN, IDAHO ~ ~~ ~ ~ E tr 1 i ~ }, r ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ,: ~ ' ' y;~ $ ~ E s~ f. I ~a ~! ~ r '~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ , ,~ 1 !!1 .' ~ t ~ ~ . 3~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ p ; i ~~ ,~f ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y 1r ~ 2 1 ~ ~~ r p ~ i ~ ~~ ~ , ~ ( ~ ' a SjS +~ p ~ i ~ ! t ~ ~ I ~ ~3 1 1 ~ `i f~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ° ` S ~ i•. i i ~~ f ~ i 1 ~ ~1 ~ ~%~` I c ~ r ;. t ~ ~1' ~ ~ ~ ' t yy 1 t I I ~ ~ ~ ~.3 t'~? t ~ ~ .~ } ~ ~ ~ i f. ~ i 3 a~ ~. I , ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ } ~ ; ~ 1~ 2 p E~~~, ,~' ~ 4 I ; j ~ s '~x :11 1 ~ ~ E ; ~ 'f ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ t i ~, c ~ ~ ~ ,. ~ i ~ E f ~ F. ~'1~. 7 { i i 77 •t i~ # ~ f f ; ~ ~ ~ ` `~ ~ i u :. ft I ~l' ~ { ,i 1 [ t ~ i S [ ~ -{ r i-x3. I ~. s ~~ cf '%, ~ i~ ~:9i'. .~ „ ~ ~ i. i r:.,. ~ , • II. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS. A. CITY makes the following acknowledgement: 1. Publicity as required by law. CITY acknowledges and agrees that CITY shall utilize best efforts to avoid publicizing such information regarding the demolition, clearance, removal, and/or disposal of the buildings, structures, and concrete pads located at or on the SUBJECT PROPERTY, until such time as is agreed to herein. B. LARRY BEDDES makes the following acknowledgements and certifications: 1. Certification of ownership. LARRY BEDDES hereby certifies that he is ~"'° the title owner of the SUBJECT PROPERTY, i.e., parcel no. 86129020670, the street address of which is 1535 N. Main St., Meridian, Idaho. Proof of ownership of the property is set forth in Exhibit A hereto. 2. Certification of notice to debt-holders. LARRY BEDDES hereby ~'AL acknowledges and agrees that he shall be solely responsible for notifying and/or obtaining any necessary consent from any and all mortgagors, debt-holders, and/or lien-holders with an interest(s) in the buildings and/or structures on the SUBJECT PROPERTY that are to be demolished, cleared, removed, and/or disposed of under this Agreement. 3. No compensation due. LARRY BEDDES acknowledges and agrees that ~"~'~~ he is not entitled to, and shall neither request nor expect, any compensation whatsoever, whether monetary or in-kind, in exchange for his permission to CITY to engage in the demolition activities described and agreed to herein. LARRY BEDDES further acknowledges and agrees that no portion of this Agreement, nor any other representation, written or oral, made by CITY or by any CITY official, servant, agent, employee, guest, and/or business invitee, shall entitle or is intended to entitle LARRY BEDDES to any such compensation. ~ 4. No obligation created. LARRY BEDDES acknowledges and agrees that IN" I''~' this Agreement is not, and does not create, an obligation upon CITY to perform the demolition, clearance, removal, and/or disposal of any building, structure, and concrete pad located on the parcel at the SUBJECT PROPERTY. 5. No further obligation. LARRY BEDDES acknowledges and agrees that AL upon CITY's completion, or causing the completion, of the demolition, clearance, removal, and/or disposal activities described and agreed to herein, the parties shall have no further obligation to each other whatsoever. AGREEMENT FOR DEMOLTfION OF BUILDINGS PAGE 3 OF I 1535 N. MATH ST., MERIDIAN, IDAHO t ~ 1 E i 1..{ ~ ,1 kvr ~'.{ '~'. Fs.. F ~ k.. ~ 2 ~ ;~ =.i; ~0. ~ '.'i . ' S ~T.: ~. r. . . . . . ~ ~ s i c 1 - ~~~~~ ~I~ ~~~~ __ H .. ~• rt' {. ~ ~ l. f ; ~ ~ x l .j' ~:KS]E` ~~`'~ N21 'Y '. .~ ..~:.. ~. ~ ii t 4i} t j3 ~ ,g7yX . . r .1 { . V.t i. v lk; ~ ~"f ~` S t i ~ 2 d i i' ~ ~ ~ x , ~ ~ ~ . ~p { ~ . . t ~ ~ ' J.. vT `.d~ ". .. ~(~ 3 tits. j~'~ ~ ;:. 1• X17. . i: E: I ~'_ I ~ ~; i ~ i 6. Forfeiture of personal property. LARRY BEDDES acknowledges that ~`~' any personal property, effects, fixtures, salvage, materials, debris, or the like from the SUBJECT PROPERTY which are not removed by 5:00 p.m. on August 1, 2008 shall be forfeited and maybe destroyed, demolished, cleared, removed, recycled, and/or disposed of at CTTY's discretion, subject only to any applicable terms of this Agreement. LARRY BEDDES shall, and hereby does, disclaim any interest in any personal property, personal effects, fixtures, salvage, materials, debris, or the like, known or unknown to LARRY BEDDES, which is or may be on the premises of the SUBJECT PROPERTY after 5:00 p.m. on August 1, 2008. 7. No subsurface removal. LARRY BEDDES acknowledges that INITIAL demolition, clearance, removal, and/or disposal activity undertaken pursuant to this Agreement shall be limited to above-ground structures, with the exception of any foundations and/or concrete slabs. LARRY BEDDES further acknowledges that removal of subsurface structures and/or materials, manmade or organic, shall not be conducted unless necessary to address an imminent threat to public health and safety. 8. CITY determines manner of activity. LARRY BEDDES acknowledges INITIAL. that demolition activity undertaken pursuant to this Agreement maybe undertaken in any manner directed and/or determined by CITY to be in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the community. III. INDEMNIFICATION. Indemnification of debt-holders by LARRY BEDDES. LARRY BEDDES ~"~'~"'' hereby agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY, and CTTY's officials, servants, agents, employees, guests, and business invitees, from and for any and all losses, claims, actions, judgments for damages, and/or losses and expenses caused or incurred by any mortgagors, debtholders, and/or lienholders, known or unknown, whether arising directly or indirectly out of the above- described demolition, clearance, removal, and/or disposal activities. B. Hazardous substances, materials, or conditions. LARRY BEDDES hereby CAI' agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY, and CITY's officials, servants, agents, employees, guests, and business invitees, from and for any and all losses, claims, actions, judgments for damages, and/or losses and expenses caused or incurred as the result of, or related to, any hazardous, harmful, and/or polluting substance, material, or condition on the SUBJECT PROPERTY, whether such substance or condition is currently known or unknown to MR. BEDDES, and/or which is or may be revealed by and/or discovered following CTTY's demolition, clearance, removal, and/or disposal of the buildings, structures, and/or concrete pad(s) located on the parcel at the SUBJECT PROPERTY. This indemnification shall specifically include, but shall not be limited to: any pending, threatened, or future federal, state, or local "Superfimd" AGREEMENT FOR DEMOLITION OF BIIIIAINGS 1535 N. MAIN ST., MERIDIAN, IDAHO PAGE 4 OF 9 or Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) proceeding, claim, liability, or action; any proceeding, claim, liability, or action related to any known or unknown underground storage tank, container, or reserve; and/or any proceeding, claim, liability, or action related to any known or unknown hazardous substance, material, or condition. IV. TIMELINE. A. Time of the essence. The Parties agree that time is of the essence in the completion of their respective duties under this Agreement. B. Timeline. The following timeline shall govern the chronology of the Parties' actions taken pursuant to this Agreement: 1. Between June 2, 2008 and August 1, 2008: CITY shall complete or cause the completion of an environmental assessment of the SUBJECT PROPERTY and/or of the buildings, structures, and concrete pads thereon. 2. Between June 2, 2008 and August 1, 2008: CITY shall complete or cause the completion of an historical properties assessment of the SUBJECT PROPERTY and/or of the buildings, structures, and concrete pads thereon. 3. Between June 2, 2008 and August 31, 2008: CITY shall engage a contractor(s) and/or subcontractor(s) to complete, demolition, clearance, removal, and disposal of buildings, structures, and concrete pads at or on the SUBJECT PROPERTY. 4. By 5:00 p.m. on August 1, 2008: LARRY BEDDES shall remove all personal property and effects from the SUBJECT PROPERTY and from the buildings, structures, and concrete pads thereon. 5. No sooner than 8:00 a.m. on August 26, 2008: CITY shall notify neighboring property owners adjacent to the SUBJECT PROPERTY of such details of the planned demolition activities as CITY deems necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of, and limit inconvenience to, such neighbors immediately prior to, during, and immediately after the demolition activities. 6. No sooner than 8:00 a.m. on September 2, 2008: CITY shall make public such information regarding the demolition, clearance, removal, and/or disposal of the buildings, structures, and concrete pads located at or on the SUBJECT PROPERTY as such publication is required by the terms of CTTY's CDBG programming as established by HUD, HUD rules and regulations, and/or other applicable laws and/or policies. t~ ~~ . is AGREEMENT FOR DEMOLITION OF BUII.DINGS 1 S35 N. MAIN ST., MERIDIAN, IDAHO PAGE S OF 9 ~ f ~ ~ I k r ~ p ~ ~; ~ ~ k f ~ ~ F ~ 4 [{aa ~ 9 F ~ I e,k 1 ~ f~ ~ t ~ ~ SRS ~ y ( ~ ( ( ~ f ~ 3 ~ } ~~ i ~ E ` ; ' i ~ A ~ 9 f ~. ~ , ['` ~ ~ ~ ;x ' f a - '~ ' t' r ~ ~` ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~~ 1 gs ; ~~ y ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ' ~ ~ ~ t ! I i a ~ { # ~ 4 ~. t( ~ j~ ~ t ~5,° t I.' r f 1 ~ ~ f '7' I ~ i ~ # ~ Y ~ I 1 ! z ' ~ ~ ~ f~ ~ s ~ ~ , _~ i } t '` ~ ~ ~ ~ i f ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ' ;: ~~ i ;~ < ~ ~~i Y , z ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ F ' ~ ~~~ ¢ f~ ~ ~.: ~ 6. ~ ~ .~ ~ iii ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2f ( s i ~~~ ~ 'I' ~ ` I I ~, f p • 7. No sooner than 8:00 a.m. on September 2, 2008: CITY shall, make public such information regarding the demolition, clearance, removal, and/or disposal of the buildings, structures, and concrete pads located at or on the SUBJECT PROPERTY as such publication is required by federal, state, and local open meetings, public records, procurement, and/or other laws, rules, and policies. 8. No sooner than 8:00 a.m. on September 2, 2008: CITY shall record this Agreement with the Ada County Recorder's Office with the intent that the obligations represented in this Agreement shall attach to the SUBJECT PROPERTY rather than to the personal interest of LARRY BEDDES. 9. No sooner than 8:00 a.m. on September 2, 2008: CITY shall undertake or cause the demolition, clearance, removal, and/or disposal of each and every building, structure, and concrete pad located on the parcel at the SUBJECT PROPERTY, which work shall include the removal of any and all foundations, driveways, walkways, piping, debris, and/or portions thereof. 10. As of 8:00 a.m. on September 2, 2008: CITY's obligation to make public only that information regarding the demolition, clearance, removal, and/or disposal of each and every building, structure, and concrete pad located on the parcel at the SUBJECT PROPERTY as is required by law to be made public shall no longer apply. V. C. Compliance with timeline. CITY expressly agrees that other than those activities set forth in section III(B), above, no demolition, clearance, removal, or disposal activities will occur at the SUBJECT PROPERTY unti18:00 a.m. on September 2, 2008. STATUS OF PARTIES. A. No taz-related obligations. CITY shall not be responsible for the payment of any taxes, whether state, federal, or local, whether related to the income or holdings of LARRY BEDDES or as to the SUBJECT PROPERTY. LARRY BEDDES shall have no claim against CITY for tax-related benefits, payments, withholdings, payments, debts, or obligations of any kind. B. No employee relationship. In all matters pertaining to this agreement, neither LARRY BEDDES, nor his employees or agents shall be deemed an employee of CITY. Except as expressly provided herein, LARRY BEDDES shall have no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in CITY. C. Selection of personnel. The selection and designation of CITY personnel, employees, or contractors in the course of the performance of this agreement shall be made by CITY. AGREEMENT FOR DEMOLITION OF BUII.DINGS 1535 N. MAIN ST., MERIDIAN, IDAHO r PAGE 6 OF 9 ~ ~ June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-L REQUEST Award Bid for Grant for Sr. Citizen Center Phase 2 ICDBG-04-III-OI-SR for Repair, Re-Stripe, Re-Design of Parking Lots and Spaces for Meridian Senior Center by Henry Boswell Paving for $6,782.82 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See affached CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: ~t~~p~~ CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: RDA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~~: ,F ` is ~: I F t ~ a; ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ t ?I Q ~~~ ~ 4 f ~ y. J ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~~ ~ `` ~ I~ Ali ~ ~ f I f ~~ f {, s 4 I i ~ ~ 1~ , L ~. '~ ~ ~, a ~ 1 3~. ~ ~ % ~ ~ } ~ '~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ : 8 i ~ ' ~f , i~ . ~. ~~ { s~ I i ~ ~ a ~ ~~ ! = I I ~~ ¢ ! y ~ E q 3 'S :' ~F ~~ f ~5 i ~ t a i~ 't k i ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~, ~ , i a~ . i ~ } ri ~ ' ~i 9~ , ~ ~~ ~ X ~ ~ g' Ft ~ i ~; E ~ ~ 1~~' ~ ~ I ~' ~~ 1 _ ~ ~ ~~~ ~} Irf ~ ~7 - ' ~' ~ _ ~ i ~ ~ 4: , 1 i 3 i - ~ '~ t i s ~~ ~ 1 t , R ~ ~ il ., ~a ~ ,; , .311 .~f ~ .; ~; ~ ' t j ~ '~ Will Berg From: Cindy Hill [seniorsm60@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 200812:28 PM To: Will Berg Subject: Parking Log Will, Page 1 of 1 I have consulted with the President of the Center Pauline Lough regarding the bids for the parking lot we would like to recommed to the Council Henry Boswell paving as the chosen bidder, as he was the lowest bidder. Thank you, If you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Cindy Sincerely, Cindy Hill Coordinator Meridian Senior Center seniorsm60C~vahoo . com 6/11/2008 C _ ` ~ _ : ~ S ~ ~ ~ < <. l i j ~ ~ ~ I~ , 1 '" c K ~ ~ i ~ !r ~ t ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ , , p ~ } S ~ } r ~ ~{ i . , r , ~ ' I n ~' k ~ ~ '3 ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~:0 y 5 i ~ ~ , ~~ ~ , f } ~ ~ ~ i . t ~ ~ ~ ~ 11 '~ S ~ ~ ~ t ~ i ~ ' ~ fe ~i ~ y k' 3 y i l x :j ~ I i t ~~ y ~ E i ~ ~ S fi ~ t P _ ~ y;y ,~ ~~~~ ,it _ t ~ a y p ~,, ~ ~ `; ~ ~ ~ ~ y 4~ i f i ~ F ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ 3 ~~. h S ~ }} t ~ } 1 ~ 1 7 t ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,~ T ~I ~ ~ 1 7 $p~+~ ~ I ~ 1 I S ~ tf t f ' 8 t ~ ~ ~ !` i i # ~ _ ~ [ ~~ ~I 5 G .1 ~ .4 f 1 i . I ~ ~ 3 , APR-c'3-2008 03:42P FRDM:BOSWELL ~ Q~134213293 V~ n~wrnrn INSURED --~---- ~- PROPOSAL AND HENRY B~SWf !! ACCEPTANCE • Paving • Crack Repau • Resurlacer •Tennis Couri PAVING • cnlp seat • Strlptng (20$) 342-3293 • (208) 884-1050 • water Proofing PRO OSAL 5U MITTED TO PH -5S5S DAT - 3~D~' STREET JOB NAME • ~ ~ CITY, STATE 8 ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION 33 W . ^a~ ARC ITE ~ ~ ~ DATE OF PLA ~'- ~ /~" r. ~ O PF40 We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: Overlay Esttttnate: Remove & Replace Estimate: ~ 5 ; / /' f7'lo ~ Y J Crack Repair Estimate: S (.C.)~ ` ~ ~ P t~'/'~C f S ~ CocQ ~' New Asphalt Installation Estimate: ~ Seal Coat Estimate: ~ ~/~~ ~ ~~o WE TRY OUR aFSr FoR Your Striping Estimate: Uil@ PrOpOS6 hereby to furnish material and labor -complete in accordance with above~pecl(Ications, for the sum of r ~/ ~j ~ 1- ~'. ~~ ~~ollars $ ~ '~ Payment to a made as follows: i N Lc~ 1L ~ Authorized ~D Stgnature ~^ NOTE: Thfs proposal ay be I~ \ wiihrirawn by n4 11 not aertanfarl within _"S~l dnwa Acceptance of PrOpOSa) The above prices, speclllcations, and conditions era satisfactory a hereby accepted, You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as oultined above. Date of Acceptance S f { s ~ " i S .~ ~ :g ~ A... 3 ~i , ~' l t ~ ~~ ~ , I 1 i~ ~ ~ ~ F l , ~ ~,_~ ! .~ {it ~ F=I. I} ; ~ €{ ~ k ~ ~ S x °'j t . t t3~ ~ ~:~. S i y? ~ ( r } { .{ ~ ~~ ~tt ~ ~ y5 ~ ~ [ ' ~~ . ~ ~ fl ~ Y A l }1 l` f 4 ~ ~ [ I t ~ ~ i'± {(~1 F~~- ~~ ~i ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i { , ` ~ <. ~~~ ~ ~' } ~ ~ i~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~~t3 TO:B~135 P,1~1 Slgnature Signature ~ ~ 9 , t. '~ F'~ h ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~E;~ r ~ :' ' ~ I' ~- t ~t ~ ~ ~~ I e ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ '~ ~ ~ xK -~ y ~ I! I ~~ ~ I y ; f ` ~- ~ i I 4 F ~ {: ; 6 , ~ , 1- s P~'~ , E i S i ~ ~ ~~ { r ,,~ li fl ~ C P 1' ~ I~ ~ ! f ~ 4 - ~ [ ` `5`5~ f f~'3 li i I 2008-D4-28 08:A4 2088889803 088889803 » ~~ ~~ 2088889135 P 2/2 Date APRIL 15 2008 Rsp CHAP Wk Ph. ~ 1208) b88.9H00~ ~~ Cell Ph. i (208) 761.6000 ~ 1N10RK DESCRIPTION: SEALCOATINO 8 STRIPING ~ PRICE ~ TOTAL ~~ ~~ i ' i 1. PREP AREA TO 9E SEALED ~2. CLEAN PARKING LOT. ±3, tiROUT OU I CRACKS ! ' ~ 1~. SEAL CRACKS WRH NOT RUBBERIZEp CRACK SEALANT , ,. ,.. .. .... , Se8S.00 ; ~S, SAW CU7 SUNKEN / ALLIGATED AREAS ANO PATCH WITH MOT ASPHALT . .. . 12,165.00 , , !8. APPLY COMMERCUIL GRADE SLURRY SEALER TO ENTIRE PARKrNr3 tdTS , S~.d35.Op ~ ~ :7. STRIPE PARKING LOT TO MANAGERS SPECIFICATIONS..... .. .... ........ SI1o.00 ~ ~ ~ PARKING LOT TO THE AST' THE CENTER f ~ ! • I. PREP AREA TO BE SEALED ~2 CLEAN PARKING LOT i ~3. (iRVUTOUT CRACKS ~ ! ;d. SEAL CRACKS WITH MOT RUBBERIZED CRACK SEALANT . S2SS.OD I : 'S. SAW CUT SUNKEN r ALLIGATED AREA AND PATH WITH HOT ASPHAIt y~s,pp '8. APPLY COMMERCIAL GRADE SLURRY SEALER TO ENTIRE PARKING LOT.. 5920.00 ! ~ ~7. STRIPE PARKING L07 TO MANAGERS SPECIFIr,ATIONS .. .. .. .... F .. 3210.00 ALL LABOR AND AfATERfAtS lNCLNDED, j ''ALL WDRK DONE IN A PRpFEJS/ONAL YANNFR. i •PRO PAY/NO N?Ll WA/NTA/N A NEAT t CLEANJOB JIT~ "7Tiq~k yuw Jnr- chuoliaX Pro Pttriwg to did your jug " 1 TOTALe 59,925.00 Payment Details ~-! Cish _..... ~ GhsLk O Credit Card Name: Pro Paving / Wl1Gam C. LoOpett ~OlIKe Use ....'" Enpi»s: ~ Payment Is due when service is rsnde»d. ~ I I ACCEPTANCE ea Odt-ng rs ev e e upon reques „= ' 1' ~~ ~ ;~ ~ {. { :~ t i~ 1 ~'t . sus. ;• s ~ , ~ ti ~L ~;~ ~'i t `~ ~, k IICEN3E t t5Z52 IN8URE0 BONDED _ _ ESTIMATE IR 8o51•E Mark Trail Paving 4050 ~V. Legacy ln. Meridian Id,83642 208-323-8801 Proposal ~oe'~ • May 4, 2008 Meridian Senior Center Attn Cindy We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: l .Remove and replace approx 2500 sgft with a 3 inch mat of hot asphalt. 2.Clean all surface to be sealed using air and water as needed to prepaze for the seal coat. 3.Replace 3 parking bumpers in parking lots. Change layout of existing parking bumpers on West parking lot to ensure proper traffic flow 4.Sea1 coat parking lot with 2 coats of "Tough Coat" brand commercial grade seal coat. We recommend the 2 coats due to the weathered condition of the asphalt S.Re stripe all existing stripes and markings as to original Note: All cracks will be filled with hot rubber crack filler at no additional charge. We hereby propose to furnish materials and labor- complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of $ J.,~ , s C~<_;; All payment is due in full upon completion of work unless otherwise stated. This proposal may be withdrawn if not accepted within 30 days of receipt. We appreciate the opportunity to bid your job. Mark Trail. Acceptance of proposal X }' ~ ~ 1°,Yi' ~ ~ s q ~ ~ ~ ~ ; 7 ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ #~: , ~ _ ~ ;; ~ ~ ' ~ ~.. t r ~ ~ ~ 1. . r ~ 13 ~ ~ ~ ~, a i ~ [ ~ d xz . t i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , _ C . _,~~ ~ ~ !~ 1 ~ ~~ a ~ ~ ~~ `A r r ~ ~ ~1 i c ~, f r '; ~ ' ~ ~ F k t 'i ~~ 1~ ~r ' ~ t r ~ ~ 1 ~ + ` ~ q t~ ~ ~ r -s E i ~ y S f 4 ~-`,~ t ,~, '~ t I~ ;4 ±~ i{ _ ~ is jj ~:- F _ ~ d 4 i ~~ ' ~ ~' ~~ y~ 7 '~ `~~ I ff I j j i i ~~ 99 1 e BID SPECIFICATIONS FOR MERIDIAN SENIOR CENTER PARKING LOTS 1) Have a Public Works License 2) Two separate bids: a) Parking lots to the North (front of Center), West (Parking lots behind the Center and by the Garage), and South (Behind Dining Room) b) Parking lot to the East of the Center 3) Bid to include the following: a) Repave b) Re-stripe c) Re-design parking lot flow pattern d) Include more handicap places 1) Five handicap places to the North (front of Center) 2) Seven handicap places to the West parking lot nearest the building 4) Striping for the BusNan Parking in the Front of the Cen#er **Pay Rate as per Davis Bacon Wage scale: $13.98 base + 1.50 fringe Selected bid will need to fill out an Additional Classification Form with the Department of Commerce. t 3; ~ ; ~ s C ~ •'~~ ~L 1. ~~ f ~ ~ ?~1i- i ~ ~ ~,~ S; ~ ~ Ali 1 ~Y '~i `. t ~ i:~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ( } ~. 7 ¢ ~ ' ~ # : ' , ~ ~' ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~~ '< r { e ~ ~ ! ~ 4 ~~: ~ ~ ~ ( ~ a , 1 . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ 3 ,iE, r '! ~ ~~ {{ ; R ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~~ ! : j ~'- ` i x ! _ a ~`' ~ ti I ~ ~ - ii ~ ~` s ~ t ~t ~4 ~ ~ ~' ~ k ~ i ~ ~~ , ~ ~ 9 ~ i • ) z t 4 ~ *r s 1 ] C l} ~ 1 . G ' tt~ i F d', i ~ ~# ~~ j C ~ ~ i { } i .~ ,r~ t '~ ~ ~ ~ ,: ' '. ( s : ~, ~ ~_ ~ ` ( ~ 4 1 > i i' 1 ~ ~ <.}~jj ; { ? ~~ ~~.1 ~krs 3i Y j E k + I I ~.~~f:,~~~~ _ _. subject: RE: Davis Bacon Wages pate: Mon. 10 Mar 2003 03:22:40 -070{~ From: "Marianne Piquet" <mplquetCc>asaoeidano.com~ To: "Cindy Hifl" <seniorsrn60~vahoo.com~- CC: "pefta James" <pJamesroisagerdaho.com• Print -Close Window ... cxor. a c:~ii k)de:r irorr~ C:c:~mmFrc:c;. 4rhocvtar nets ttic=: ~~c~ntrac.t will rieec! to havers the lowest journeyman rate which is C.emer~it. Mason. 'T'hat. r-at.e i s nr. . . 7 f thp~r t}at) a hi r~h~F.r cd,.F{a ~n~JCaa ~~c~ i-F~G.r~ raT'! ~7?.1aTrc pa•„ mnra tl-ia» - i ~r r .-~~-f= , r ~ 1 '~I ~~ ~~-~~. ~'C~----~.,r t C'l-~_ -T `:~-L ~-~C~C~~"`'~ ~ Rc=..~~`7 1-1'ir`c~1'i c`'~ ~~~' ~~ Lam: !" ~ ~_ n~'Z -- ~t' ~~ ~ ~ - . 7 vim:. : C. ~ ~~"` f l c~ Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 2:35 PNl Cc: Delta James __..- ~~~ .-LL ~~ Cindv. I have left a messaoe with Idaho Dept. of Commerce and hope to have an answer for you sometime on Mondav. Thanks. Marianne Piauet. Plannino Tech. 322-7Q33 ext 21,r, ~~Fprom: C~i~ndy Hill [mailto:seniorsm60@yahoo.com] ~ii.n4: [ rJtii.i ^.•.ry'~I31 ~lI _t t. i1LV :~.L_' JL }'di To: Marianne Piquet Subject: kt: Uav~s isacon wages Marianne, vve wowo pe repav-na with asphalt. as that is what we current have m our parKmo lots. Cmav Marianne Piauet <mpiauetca~sage~dano.com> wrote: Cindy, Since there are not any job classifications in the wage determination (attached) for a paver, an Additional Classification Request would need to be completed by the contractor selected. http:/lus.f324.mail.vahoo.com/vm/ShowLetter'?box=SAGE%20Grant%202007&Ms~Id=6... 4/22/200 I i ' i j r ' i 1 r; ~~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~. t t k ~ ! s? ~ ~~ r; _ ~ ~ r ~ ~ t ; ~ ~ , i '~~ '' I`~ ~' , t, ~ ~! f .~. ~' j : r. ~ ~ ~ I i iiii s ; ~ s ~ i a f `: f: 4 a { ~ ' ~ r ~~~ f ~ , ~~ , ~ t ~ ` f` ' F ~ •' ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 4 ~~ ~~:. S ~; gp i ~ .~ ' . ~ ,~,. ~S' . ~. i! ! S , - y4 :: ~ f ~ ~ ,.y's~ {' ' a 3 ?'~ ;~ ~;~ ~ e ,r ; ~ ' ~ , I` a ~ I s l ,, ~~ ~ ~~ ` ~ i i ;~ ca ~e ~E ~ t } i ~ '` ~` !z F , ~ 5 i 3f ~. ~~ ~ _~' ~ fJ1 ~~~~~~1~ ~~ ~ S jj t F ~~ t} r ~ ~ l' ~ i ! r ~ ~~ ~ ~f M~ ` ~ ,. , f r ~ 1y '~ a ~ ~, .~` "- € ~~ f t~ .'. 1. . ~ . ~ ~ ~ i ;' j' r i 'r t : T. ~ ;` , ' ! . i, k + t t,~~ i 1 l s ~- ~ ~ f ~. r ~ i ~~ i Date: May 22, 2008 To: The Honorable Tammy de Weerd Mayor, City of Meridian 33 E Idaho Ave Meridian, ID 83642 From: Pat Madarieta, Community Development Specialist Re: ICDBG-06-III-OS-SR DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE C.L. "BUTCH" OTTER, GOVERNOR DONALD A. DIETRICH, DIRECTOR ' ~~~:~ r„ Ci$y O~ ~ler4~i~- ~ity Mork ~~~ THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO YOU FOR YOUR: Review: ^ Action: ® Signature: ^ ^ CONTRACT ^ EXECUTED CONTRACT ® CONTRACT AMENDMENT ^ EXECUTED AMENDMENT ^ ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASE ^ FINDING OF EXEMPTION ^ SUBCONTRACT APPROVALS ^ ADDITIONAL CLASSIFICATION ^ CONTRACT AWARD APPROVAL ^ BID DOCUMENT APPROVAL ^ PHONE CONVERSATION FOLLOW UP ^ OTHER COMMENTS: (Sign both copies and return to our office.) (Retain document in your project file.) (Sign both copies and return to our office.) (Retain document in your project file.) (Retain document in your project file.) (Retain document in your project file.) (Retain document in your project file.) Please sign both copies and return to: Gwynn Owen 700 West State St. PO Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0093 208-334-2650 ext. 2138 700 West State Street • Boise, Idaho 83720-0093 • Tel: 208-334-2470 • Fax: 208-334-2631 • Web: commerce.idaho.gov Equo! Opportunity Employer -~--r--1 -- ,s-__-~- ~ ~ #3~ f ~ ! 3 F G F ? ~ t ~~j ~~ T 5 ~ Y Y' ~:~ ~~ ~ t 1_ ' ~~ ~~,~ ~ ~ 1 f ~~ p i fff ~ ~ F ~ ~1 i~ 3 i 1 1 ~~ : ~ ~ 1~ f~ ' f.; ~~ ~ ~ y 2 ~~ ~ ~ I ~L .~r~r 4 ~ '.2 a i f ttp ~ ~ ~ ,. I. ... GG K R f4 ~ ~ `_ J i ~ 1 ~~ : :! ~°3 ~ :. wT ~: e 0 CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO.1 Contract No. ICDBG-06-III-OS-SR The ICDBG contract between the Department of Commerce and the City of Meridian dated May I7, 2006 is hereby amended as follows: Attachment A: Section a: Construction Scope of Work Insert: Resurface and restripe existing parking lot at senior citizens center. The foregoing contract amendment is hereby accepted with the understanding that all other terms and conditions of the contract remain the same. APPROVED: STATE OF IDAHO Department of Commerce onald A. Dietrich Director CITY OF MERIDIAN The Honorable y de Weerd Mayor 19 h~acn ~o ~ Date - `1M 3o ao~~" ,,,,,,,,,,~,,,,,,,,,,s, Date .~`~,~'~ ~~'si .} ``~ 'r ~i i A i S~ o ~~A~CEE ~et_rYi~~ ~ °' %~,~ T t~ . P ,``. o~ ~. ~.. 4 {g7 llf pp F{} 11 6 <. t J R t ~ y ~ } 'I 1 E 4 f. A 1V ~~ ~] S I ~ ~. t ~f, ~ ~ i1 8 { {~ E ~ r ~,~ ~ S ij ~ i ~ }.. ~ i j ~ { ~ '~ ~ ~, _ 1 t' k k : 117 2 ! 1 V f ~ ~ ' 1 ~. t; t ~~ ~ ~ 4 } ~ f 1 1 ~~ ' {~~ 4 i 1: i ~ t a ~ a ~. ~, ~ "' 7 ' ~' ` ~~ c i ii fi~ z ~ ~ ~;~ t ~ ~ } ~, i . F 99 ~ I f ~ { ' F ~ ~ I ' ~ T n~' i IS ~ r' t ~~~ Si F j ~ ¢ .. e ~ For Internal Use of the Department of Commerce Reviewed and Approved Dennis Porter Community Development Manager ~~ ~ L~ Lisa Robbins Financial Manager Donald A Dietrich Economic Development Administrator F t r° ~! _+ ;; ;: ~ . ,,~ . T ~; r 9 ., .; -: f ~ ~ _ S I ~ ~ s i4 og Date ~-'~ rte'- ~~ Date ~q may, aaag' Date ~' 4 ~. f z ~~~ I~ 3 t _. a I t' 4 j '-' ~ ~ i i': t ~! i 1 ~: ~. i ~' ;' 1 .' ! ~' i 3~ I N i ,: 1 1< r ~' V 2 t ~Il: ~ . I I i V j 7 I ' • CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. I Contract No. ICDBG-06-III-OS-SR The ICDBG contract between the Department of Commerce and the City of Meridian dated May 17, 2006 is hereby amended as follows: Attachment A: Section a: Construction Scope of Work Insert: Resurface and restripe existing parking lot at senior citizens center. The foregoing contract amendment is hereby accepted with the understanding that all other terms and conditions of the contract remain the same. APPROVED: STATE OF IDAHO Department of Commerce Donald A. Dietrich Director CITY OF MERIDIAN The Honorab y de Weerd Mayor m ct. I ~ ~- o ~ ~' Date Date ~a~`~ ~ i~i~~t . C)~c d'iA' U,e ~~ ~~. ., b~ i ~: ~ ~ t} ~ g ~ § i ~ ( ~ `~; 4 x ~ 666 i' S1'. F ~ ~:, ~ ~, { 7,y ~~ ~~ i '+ ~ ~ ~ ~~ i. ~. ~ 1 99 _ ~~ ~ ~I 1 ~~ ~. ~F ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ f ~ ~~ t }} ~ r~ r ~_ ~ ~~ 'I ~ ~, ~ 1 i° f~, } t 1 ~ ~' ~ i 4 . ~ ~'~ ~ k ~ ~ ~ j1+ c S1I - ~ ~ 1 t i ~ P t ~K ~ I~ ~~~ ~~ ~ i, I ~ ~~ n t l ~ ~ z~ Sl ~ ~ ~" z ~~ ~~ ~ .. 7 i ~ ~ i ~¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I' ~' . 0 For Internal Use of the Department of Commerce Reviewed and Approved Dennis Porter Community Development Manager v ~_ Lisa Robbins Financial Manager w Donald A Dietrich Economic Development Administrator 5 i4 08 Date Date ~ ~ may ~v8' Date ~ d is t f C ~ - t ~~., 1{ ~ t ~ ~ ~. ~ ~~ 1 ~ 7 ~: , ~ I f y ! t ~ 1 1. Y ~ t 'i~ I 1 ~E x i a ~ i ~ t f= l c ~ ~ ~ t ~: r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~~ " ~: S ~ ~ f 7 1 ~ 3 ~ < ~ f t~ R.. r ~ . 1 yf ~ ~ D ~ ~ a R ~~ ~ ~ Y i' ~ q~ ~ r i '!~~ a ~~ 1 i ; ~ : ~ 1c 1 F ~ ~ E~ ~ ~ 'ir,; ~ y ~ 1 - - t ~ i ~ ~ ~ ; f. ~ 3~ ~~ E 1 ,1 f= ~ ~ t r ~~~ ~ i 4 ~ '~~~ ~ ~ c J l k ?j jt I i~ S 1 • Todd Lavoie From: Delta James [DJames@sageidaho.com] lent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 9:06 AM To: Todd Lavoie Subject: FW: project amendment request - Meridian Sr Center Hi Todd, The Dept. of Commerce will soon be sending, attention to you, a letter approving our request to amend the Meridian Senior Center project to include parking lot improvements, and a CDBG contract amendment that will need to be signed by the mayor and returned to Dept. of Commerce. Please keep your eye out for this correspondence from Dept. of Commerce, have the Mayor sign the appropriate paperwork, then return the original signed copy to: Dept . of Commerce Att: Pat Madarieta PO Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720 Keep a copy for City files and please send me a copy at: Delta James Sage Community Resources PO BOX 902 Donnelly, ID 83615 Please let me know if you have questions. Again, thank you for your help with this project and your quick responses - it is truly a pleasure to be working with you. All the best for an enjoyable long Memorial Day weekend, Delta James Planning Specialist Business & Community Development Sage Community Resources PO BOX 902 Donnelly, ID 83615 Ph: 208-859-7042 From: Pat Madarieta [mailto:pat.madarieta@commerce.idaho.gov] Sent: Tue 5/20/2008 3:21 PM To: Delta James Subject: RE: project amendment request - Meridian Sr Center It will go out of our office tomorrow. We will send it to Todd Lavoue's attention. You might let him know it is coming and to return it to our office as quickly as possible. -----Original Message----- ~ ^rom: Delta James [mailto:DJames@sageidaho.com] sent: 20 May, 2008 15:15 To: Pat Madarieta Cc: seniorsm60@yahoo.com Subject: project amendment request - Meridian Sr Center 1 <.4. ~. (. e ~ June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-M REQUEST New Liquor License for Brian Wetzel dba Gelato Cafe located at 2053 East Fairview Suite 101 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See affached CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: ~~~~ CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meddlan. `p~ f ? '~ a j, 1 ~ py+~ ~ i ~ ~ ' ~ 3~' i 1 1 ~ 1 ' ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~~.~ iiilll ~" NN E .€ ' ~ 333 ~ ~a j ~ ,~ ~' ~ ~_ ' f ~ . _ , ~ r ~: ~ a ~ AIDS ~ _ t `'~ ' ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~! ~ ~ f~ ~ R j ~ w ~ ~ [ i , ; I ~ a I n } i s f i 7 ~:~ ~ , ~~ + ~ ~ L 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 4 C ` ~' ~ i ~ ~ } Qx 5 3 ~ . ~ ~ r ~ ' ~ ~ 5~ ~ ~ f x ~ ~ t y j ~ ( ~ ~ 't fi ' ~~ d t ' ~ I ~ ) ~ > ~~ ~ ypt { {z ~ I ~ ~~ ~ j _~ j ~ F I ~ _ ~' ; 5 ~ ; f ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ i~~ ~ ~ ~ ' '4 ; ~Y ~f r, ~ ~' ,~ , ^' i°" ) t . r ~ j , 1 ~ ' # 1 r ,~ f s. j , ' ( ~ . t .i [~~` t ~ i ~I t 3 '~.'.v it. ~'ffi°ii .. ~~ i 3~ ~3"-.SI j },. ~ _ Ju~.10. 2008 2~41PM No.5269 P. 2/2 Far Internal ~ O'fflce Use Cynly: Applicant: Brian J. Wetzel Business Name: Galata Qaf~ ~, Location: 2063 E. Fairview Ave.. #'101. Meridian 83642 License Type: [Xj Beer [ ]wine [X] Liquor Application /File Fee: Beer Owngr Transfer 560.00 and New Llauar License ffi562.5~0 ~ $842.50 Receipt No. 1. 2A3 Economic Qeve~on Economic Development Approval: N/A Signature Date ,P_,oliae ©eAartment: I~olice Chief Approval: Signature Date Fire De,~rarMne_int: Fire Chief Approval: Signature Date Planning Denartr~,B,t- Planning Director Approval: Signature Date !'!~~Ic worica Department: Develr~pment Services Manager Approvaal• ,~ )0 D'$ Signature to PLEASE RE't`U~N THIS SHEET ONLY with the appropriate signature. This item is scheduled to be approved on the Tu®sday .tune 70~', City Council Agenda. TMANK Y4U. ' .~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ r ~ ~ ~ I ~y ~ ~ I ~ `1` i ~ { ~ t ~~ ~ ~~-~ ~ ~ s ;~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~'-. K t x( ~~ { 1 a ~ ~YY 4 ~' ~ 6 !f -~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ '' ~ 4 ~ ttt _ E ° Y, f t- 7; f i ~1 ` ~. ~R ~ f ~ ~~ i C tl7 - ~ >F. ~ ; b; ! ~ ~ I s.# A ~ i~, tf iun cue ue io: ooa . For Internal . Qffice Use C?nly: Applicant: Brian J._ Wetzel Business Name: Getato Cafe __ .. _ Location: 2053 fr. Fairview Ave. #101, Meridian 83642 License Type: [xj Beer [ ]Wine (X] Liquor p.l Application /File Fee: Beer c3wner Transfer $x0.00 and New Liquor License $562.5Q = X612.50 Receipt No. 132,43 Ecanamic Development: Economic Development Approval: NIA Signature Date Police Derrartment: Policy Chief Approval: h Signature Date Fire Department: Fire Chief Approval: C7ate Planning Director Approval: Signature Date Public Works ©epartrnent: Development Services Manager Approval: Signature Date PLEASE RETURN THiS SHEEP O~V~ with the appropriate signature. This item is scheduled to be approved on the Tuesday June 10~'. City Council Agenda. THANK YOU. a ~ n +f i ~' ~ a . ~~ ~ ~ € ~ I P 3! r',J 7 F 1 ~w 1 fGP i 3 g ~ it ~ t @ ~ ~ t ~ .~ ~ ~~ i k~ k ~ R !' tl 3 ,~ 4 i e i ' I' ~ ~ E I ~i I # s Ei~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ E~~ ~ ' + d ~ °~ ¢ ~ ~ Y ' f 8 ~ ~ i Ii ~ r ~~ ~ ; ~ ~ # ~ { ~~ ~ € E 4 s ? I ! r ~ i ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ( ~ ; ~f , iE~ E;~ ~a~ ~ ~ ~$ ~ i ' ~ ~ ! ' ~ pkp f ' ~ y f ddd tl E ' ;VI ~ Y j~ t j e j ~ p I ~~~k r k. ' ~ i , ~~ s~i j ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~, S • BEER LICENSE TRANSFER OF OWNER APPLICATION AND NEW LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION INTERNAL APPROVAL CHECKLIST For Internal -Office Use Only: Applicant: Brian J. Wetzel Business Name: Gelato Cafe Location: 2053 E. Fairview Ave. #101, Meridian 83642 License Type: [X] Beer [ ]Wine [X] Liquor Application /File Fee: Beer Owner Transfer $50.00 and New Liquor License $562.50 = $612.50 Receipt No. 13243 0 Economic Develoament: Economic Development Approval: N/A Signature Date Poiice Department: Police Chief Approval: Signature Date Fire Deaartment: Fire Chief Approval: Signa re _ Date Planning Department: ~ ~ ~~ Planning it for Approval: t.. ~.e.4°~c~ nature Date Pubiic Works Department: u~i Development Services Manager Approval: Signature Da#e PLEASE RETURN THIS SHEET ONLY with the appropriate signature. This item is scheduled to be approved on the Tuesday June 10~', City Council Agenda. THANK YOU. ~ j i ~~; I ' ~~ ~ ~~~ ~r '~, ~. ~ ;, ,, ~~ ~; ~, ~, t~ ~ ~< ~ t ~. F ~' t i~ ~ ~~ }~ ~ I s ~ ~~ ~ ;~ ~ z i ~ ,, 7 ~ ~, !c ~ ~. t € ~ ~~ ~ E ~ r. i ~" , . :~ F ~~ ~ E~: ~ ,, ,~ t ,+s i~ ~ BEER LICENSE TRANSFER OF OWNER APPLICATION AND NEW LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION INTERNAL APPROVAL CHECKLIST For Internal -Office Use Only: Applicant: Brian J. Wetzel Business Name: Gelato Cafe Location: 2053 E. Fairview Ave. #101. Meridian 83642 License Type: [X] Beer [ ]Wine [X] Liquor Application /File Fee: Beer Owner Transfer $50.00 and New Liauor License $562.50 = $612.50 Receipt No. 13243 Economic Development: Economic Development Approval: N/A Signature Date Police Department: Police Chief Approval: Signature Fire Department: Fire Chief Approval: Date Signature `Dat'e Planning Department: Planning Director Approval: , Signature Date Public Works Department: Development Services Manager Approval:-~ /.~~!®A~~ Signature Date PLEASE RETURN THIS SHEET ONLY with the appropriate signature. This item is scheduled to be approved on the Tuesday June 10th, City Council Agenda. THANK YOU. I ~~ S f ~ ~ C ~, S i S ~~ { j ~ ~ f ~ { }` ~ ~ 15 i kt ~ T ~ i t g gg%' t _ 9 ~ S31 ~ ~ ti. yy p ~~! L [[ ~t E F e ~ : 3 f i j R Y F a ~ LL + G t~ ~ + ~ , b ( j ~j i~ 1 ~ ' i ` ~ ' ~ .~ .~ r M ~ ~ ~ + : t ~ ~ L r . I 1 1 + ~~ ~ ~ p k i ?~ ~- ~.7i. ~ S .fit i e + i ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ' ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ I l 11 r • z a , ~t £' ' ~ ~f ~ €- ~ j ~ (4 i € ~ 1 {i + I; I I. ~, O ~~i~'~E tDIAN~-- s ydb-S54) MayorTammy de Weerd City Council Members: Keith Bird Joe Gorton Charles Rountree David Zaremba APPLICATION FOR RETAIL LIQUOR LICENSE Application Year aC~®~ °C~ 1 FEE IN THE SUM OF $562.50 IS ENCLOSED WARNING If any false statement is made in any part of said application or any subsequent report, the applicant, or applicants, shall be deemed guilty of a felony an upon conviction thereof shall be imprisoned in the State prison for not less than one year nor more than five years, or fined not less than $1,000.00 nor more than $5,000.00, or both such fine and imprisonment. If during the period of any license issued by the City Council any material change in the requirements above stated shall take place, the license shall forthwith made a verified report of such change to the City of Meridian. No person shall be granted more than one license in any city or village for any one year. All licenses expire at midnight on April 30~". All licenses are applicable only to the premises in respect to which they are issued. ~i~,~s C.~aF~- 2c~s.~ E. F'.4rR~: ~r,,1' ~d~ ~ i~ i O~l~a~a~~, 2~ ~~6~~ Application is hereby made for a license to sell liquor by the drink upon the premises particularly described as follows: Name of Business ~~-A°sa~ ~9-~~ Address: Z~3 ~. ~A-e~vs~w ~U~ ~}- 1.9i • !-~I~,.t': ~; ~-y ~ ~b~Z Type of building: ~, er-c.~ w 1 ____ List of all business being carried on in the same building: ~~~ ~~~- Premises are (check one), Owned ~; Owned and Mortgaged ; Amount of loan secured by mortgage $ ~ ; City Clerk's Office . 33 E. Idaho Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-888-4433 . Fax 208-888-4218 . www.meridiancity.org Leased r Rented. (If leased, or rented, attach copy of lease or other instrument indicating plainly thereon the clause which constitutes owners consent to sale of liquor on premises). The State retail license for these premises is held in the name of °~ ~~~~ ~. uz3~? ~~ ~ ,and is numbered 71 `~' , c9 .Fixtures in the premises of the value of $ ~ ~~ ,and are (check one) Owned (~); Held on conditional sales contract ( ); Leased or rented ( ). (Vote: See instruction sheet. In connection with this application, the following schedules of additional information are attached: Schedule A: Statement and oath of personal qualifications. To be completed by an individual owner, by ALL partners, if application is for a partnership, and by all members of the Board of Directors and all officers and ten principal stockholders of corporate applicant. Schedule B: To be provided by Applicant: Balance Sheet showing the assets, liabilities and capital account as of the date of the application, certified to by the owner, a partner, or an officer of a corporate applicant, and by the individual or firm preparing the same. Schedule C: Statement of the names of all persons, individual and corporate, who have any financial interest in the business to be conducted on the premises to be licensed. Schedule D: A floor plan of the premises to be licensed. All statements herein contained, including the information in the attached schedules which is within the knowledge of the person subscribing this application, are declared to be true. Dated this ~~ day of ~u~~ ~~ -~. Sig re of Applicant Retail Liquor License Application Page 2 of 6 t F ~ I ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ` ~ ~ I ~~ 4 I . ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~ A ~ . j f ' ~11 t S ~ ~ t~vi iiS tt ~ ^l, ^^^ ~ J J ~~ ~ ~ ~,. ~ r coq ~. ~ I ~ ; ~ ~ ~ t ~6 {, ~ ; ~ ~ E ~ ~' ~ ~~ ~ ~~ i 3i ~~ ~i ~~ i ~~~~~ . # k ~ 3~ t 7 ~ = ~ I L! g ~ Fa '~ ~ f ~ s 1 1 [ ~ 'i° ~ ~ i..i ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ff '~ ~ i ~i Yi' 1 ~ @ 1 E. 1 ~ f 1 i~ ~~ ,i ~ ~ 1~ ~ f' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~' ~ iS ~~ r ~ a ~ ~ 3 # ~ ~' 1 ~ ~ ;~ [ ~ J f ~ j ~ ? ~ ~ t ~ . ~ ~ ~ + t! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ; r~'~ ~ `. ~ ~ ;: ~ ~ ( ? f~ ~ ~ ' ~, - '. ~ ~'~ ii ~ ,, i ~. ~' ~ :. f is ~Y ~ ~' ~ ~ ~~ s ' '~ (~ i' STATE OF IDAHO ) ss: County of A~~-° ) I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this ~~ day of J~~~ ,~~ before the undersigned, a Notary Public in the State of Idaho, personally appeared ~j~'~Cl~ ~~~7~ ,known to me to be the person who executed the said instrument, and acknowledged to me that he /she executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL®®® "-"~-.~®®° ~ otary Public for Idaho e P p~ ~., ®g Residing at ,Idaho ®~,,; '; ~ My Commission Expires: 0-l l -l ~ ~ p ~~~,~i ~ ®°® ~~'® (except balance sheet) Retail Liquor License Application Page 3 of 6 F } j.~ ~ y{y~~ ( Yi~ I TT ~ ,6{~ + r ~ r r . i R~ ~ ry t~ ~, '' ~ ~ E ~_- x(. ~ ` ~~ . ~~ ~ , .< ~;ri 1 6 i i~~; ;,~ ~ 1~- t ~: ~ ~ a i f ~ ~ t ~ a- ~ ' ~ ~~ ~i ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~,., 9 ~ 666 ~ . v y~' § I~ ;~. ~-+ I4x ~~ +~~+r~ . .. ' 1 ~ r ~ ~, a r 2' ~~ F t'. ` Y ~ 4 ~ + ~ 't .. + ~i~ ' i ~` -~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ f 1 n a i~. ~ i ~,, ~ r ! f ~~ ~ a ~~ r~ ~ i c ~ ~ ~ C '~ i } ~ II 1 ;~. i i ~ C ~ ~ 6 r ~ ., ' ~' ; , j{j{ ~ s ~ ~ ~, '- ~ ~ ~ - 3x~. ~ ~ ~ r i, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ E ~~ 4~ ~ , + j ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F ,l .- 3 7 { ~ ~~ d F ~ ~ ~i ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ 5~ 1 $ z t 3 ~ ~~ ej _ - ~~ ~a t i ~ .. 'S1 ~ ~Yy 3, r _ - f ~ ° f Y 1 j $ ~Y ~ f ~'bi t) ate . ~ Vj tlyiy ~ C ~ • o APPLICATION FOR RETAIL LIQUOR LICENSE 200 - 200 SCHEDULE C STATEMENT OF THE NAMES OF ALL PERSONS, INDIVIDUAL OR CORPORATE WHO HAVE ANY FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THE BUSINESS TO BE CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISES TO BE LICENSED: (Instructions: Include open loans, mortgages, conditional sales contracts, partnerships, silent partnerships, trusts or other interests, excepting only open trade account incurred in the ordinary course of business). NAME DATE AND NATURE OF INTEREST AMOUNT INVOLVED ~7 f i° ~-w~ 5 . VJ~ %~ z~( ~ ` Z -c`~ c~.,~~nstr- °9 rlt`~, c~~ In the case of corporate applicant, furnish the following information (list separately if needed): Date and place of incorporation: Registered Office: Names of all members of the Board of Directors: Names of all officers of the corporation: Names of the ten principal stockholders and amount of stock. Number of Shares Amount Names of Stock Held Par Value Paid for Share Authorized capital stock of corporate applicant: $ ~ r L[ ~ 1 !~ f ~ G7 (i 1 4 ~ Y l t ~ y8 " ~~ ~ Qµ ~I ~~ EEE ~ ~ ~ f J ~ ~ ~ ~ r 8 ~ ( ~ 6 ~ '~ ~ ~ I F:1 }}} } 2 i i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J _' ., i Ye y ~~ f. a i ', , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ + ~ ~ k ~ ~ z I ~ ~ - I ~ 'x t ~ e I ~~ ! I i ~~ ~F (~ `a ~ 4 3 i ~;, s ~ i~ ~ .: i 1! ". ~ f p ,j i !~ i ~ i ~;.E i~ r i y~ , s ~ t ~ 8~ ~ ~~,~ ~ ~' ~ ~ '~ a t t • tt. Y: .. fi QQ t, ; . y i~ 7 1 c ~ ~ ~ t~ ~` ~,~ i ( 9 ~ ~ f i r y ~ ~ ~ ! t - F F i ~ ~ ~ i' " i~ ~ ~ i E ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ e t , j ; G~~ ~ ~I F ~ fi r i MayorTammy de Weerd City Council Members: Keith Bird Joe Borton Charles Rountree David Zaremba March 13, 2008 Brian J. Wetzel Capital Financial Services, Inc, 2707 Meadowbrook Dr. Boise, Idaho 83705 RE: Zoning Verification Letter for the Property at 2053 E. Fairview Ave. Dear Mr. Wetzel: In response to your request for zoning verification for the property located at 2053 E. Fairview Ave. please note the following: • .This property is located within the corporate boundaries of the City of Meridian and current zoning district of the property is C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial district). The C-G zone allows for the largest scale and broadest mix of retail, office, service and light industrial uses in the City. • The abutting zoning designations are as follows: North: zoned C-C (Community Business District) & C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial District) South: zoned I-L (Light Industrial District) East: zoned C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial District) West: zoned C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial District). • Full service restaurants are principally permitted in the C-G zone. T'he definition of a restaurant is: A) The use of a site foY the pYimaYy puYpose of food pYepaYation, having kitchen and cooking facilities, and wheYe meals aYe YegulaYly seYVed to the public foY compensation. The use includes, but is not limited to cafe, coffee shop, delicatessen, dineY, eateYy, gYill, pizza paYloY, YestauYant, Ytail bakeYy; sushi baY, steakhouse. B) Establishments with a ZiquoY license that includes a YestauYant ceYtifzcate and that meet the definition of YestauYant as set foYth in Idaho AdministYative Code 11.05.01.010.04. C) Establishments with a beet and wine license that meet the definition of YestauYant as set foYth in Idaho AdministYative Code 11.05.01.010.04, including but not limited to bYew pubs and wine baYS. • The existing restaurant;""Gelato Cafe, " is considered a conforming use and complies with the "applicable zoning regulations: As a permitted restaurant, ancillary alcohol sales are also permitted and in compliance with zoning regulations. Planning Department .660 E. Watertower Street, Suite 202, Meridian, ID 83642 Ph[]r1P_ ?OF3-f384-.riri~~ Fax 7nR-RRR-(iR.rid . ~nnen~v marirlian~ity nrn yyy ~ ~~ 1 ~ ; 1 h +t '~t ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ 5 f~ ~ G ~ t ft~ ~ ~ ~a 1 533G5 Z ' ~i ~ ~' ~ k~I F~ t S I ~ ~ . ~~ ~~" ~ p i '~3i ~(: ~ ' 3 ~ W ~: i ~' 'c k~ ~ ~U ' . . A ~~4 . r~" t~ ~ i I :i i 3 ~ i ' ~ ~ : 4 .~ ~ k 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~+ ~ `" i R ~ ' t ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ i ~ ~ z. r ii , ~ ~ ~ ~ t r ' rS a ~ jf 7~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ; ~ 4 tt ;i S ~~ . n ~, ~ ~`3 i f ~ly l ~~l ~ S ` ~ ~ ° 1 t ~~y ~ f ~ ~ ~ j6 ~ ~ Ff ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ I x ~ % ~ y ' , @ ~ ~ ~r 3 1 r. f ~ ~ I ~ A ~ ` ~ ` ~ {i F y p ~ r, 9 ' ~. ~ # ~: f ~:~4 ~ ~ . . ' ~h ~.; 1 '~ !S ' . C~ • The sale/consumption of alcoholic beverages is allowed on the premises but only as a secondary use to the restaurant use. • To the best of my knowledge, this site does not have any building or zoning violations and no variances or special exemptions were approved. If you should have any further questions regarding this matter, please don't hesitate to contact Sarah Wheeler at (208)884-5533. e t C. Caleb` Hood Current Planning Manager r ~ 1~. { 3 ~ s ~. 4 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ; ' ~ '. S ii k 1 ~ ~ k ; ~. ~ ~' ~ i j k ~' ; i 31 .. 4 1~ t~1~ c t: g i { -, i- ~: `y 4 i 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~~~ ~ ' : ~ j 1 ~ ~ ~_ , ~ i ~ ~~ 11 Y F ~ l ~ , j F ~ ~' ~ s t g 1 ~ ~ , ~ ~~_: ~ i ~, ;1 ~ ~ ~ '. T ' ~ !F ~ ~ ~l ~ -~ _ Z 6 '... + ` ' t `1 y' ti # + ~ ? * i4 ~` ~ .~~~t ~~: ~ ',i i i F ~ r-~~ ~~e ~~ S ~`) x, , i~ r~ l J ) t ~ { ` t f ~ }kp ~~~ ~ ~ cfi ' :3 ~ ~ ~ G r 1' ~~ ~ f ~~ _ t ~ }, ~ a ~ ~ .~ (p a i? ' ~~ ~ ~~y ~ ~ } ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ i ) 1 4v ~ f.s } xt ~ F . i , E f ~, k 3 S ~..~ i ;: ~~ .r ~i ~ ~ ~ ! ~ 11 j 1 1 } ' i t is } ~ C ,; ~ 3 ... a ~s / C( ^"! ^! R" '!~ d ~- a -~ o m A ~ C. ~ ~f C ~ ~ ~ A 0 N ~ o 0 n O -~ rdbd ~m p o ~ ~' r r ~ ~ m y `~ ~ d ~ QQ '~ a m ~ ~ ~ n o n ~`' ° a C7 ~ ~ c r m ~ .ti• ~ w '* C17 ~ 0. ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ y ~• H !G9 ~ ~../ e~- ~ ~ ~ O _' ~ ~! y. O ~ ~ ~! N !C . J ~1 C ° A ,-. ^ y a 0 o 0 ° n C" ~'" ~ ~ C m c x o~ o c: ~ ~ A iC ~. .+ ~ ..t C/1 ~ ` ~. lsJ.. a ~ C1 ~ ~ w Cl9 ~ N r o O n ~ ~ A O. ~ y ~ ~ ~ d o a a -e O m a ~-h ~ O S O = o 3 H ~ Q O. A 'S y 4, W "'V. 0 ~ "`° ~ a ~ O n ~ `y ti o ~ ~ I b~ r w .~ N ~ e nn• y ~. A y ~ ~ O ~ O ~ ~ z ~ '`f'.... ,,~~yi' ". ~ ~1 /~'- ~~ Q o ~ ° -- ~=7_ z o ~ W ~ N tv O ~_ W N b ,~ ~ S ~ 4... ~..' - C'Y I ~~ i ~ ~~ i ! i y7 a r~-~ ~ S ' ~ ~',Y ~ ~ '~ i~ ~-~ r r~ i i ~ ~ e { ~ ~, E :~ € ~ ; i- i ~'E~~ ~ t~t~ ~ L' ~ ~ t ~ `888 ~ ,~ ~, ; ~ is s~ i , h C 3 . t ~ 1 4 ~ ~' ~' ~ ~Bt .~~ ` . , I ~ f - ~ ~~ } ~ ,~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ i k ~ € x ~ ~~t ~t~ ~ r a F ~~'~ ; l i a ~~ i ~ r f,~~ c ~sl~ i ~ SCk HEVEHSF~'ll)E FUH SALE OR TRANSFER OF THIS LICENSE O AO 3 2 O n m ~, y O 0 m a 0 N O O W OO O O r ~ ~ ~ oo p ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O N, ~ (D CD ~ p O ~ ~ ~ C 3 O .~ o D ~ r m ° u v v n n n Ed9 Edo Ed9 Ef3 ~ ~ ~ po ~1 O O C37 O O O X 0 0 X 0 0 O O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 O o m ~ z m ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ v ~ y ~ w o p ~ .~.i m m N ~ ~ ~ O O L U. T /~ ~ C rn 0 f~D n 3 0 w A C) ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ coo ~ o ~ ~ (gyp N A" ~~ n Z `~,.,.a~~lll J ~~ c0 ~ ~' A ~, t0 A a ::: ~ tD o ~ ~=~ -~ . -. ~~ ~ ~~~ A fem., \Y F ~n\l\~~l V coo ~, ~ N ~. ,.,, ~ A ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. cO ~ A Cp ~ ~ ~' y ~ ~ ~ D ~ ~~ co ~ ~ O w~ ~ ~ o ~ 0 ~~ o ~ ~ `° ~ D ~~ ~ °~ a ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~~ co W ~- ~~ ~~ ~rn ~n ,~ ~ ~' cD M ~• O D i:! JJJJj~)>J ~T m ~ ~~ A ~ ~ .. ;^ ~ o ~ r ~ k'„ijJJ~j) A ~ z ~ m ~ ~' ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ '~~m~ll ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a J~ .~ o- • ~` c0 ~ 11 m i~ ~,~~~~ll W C4 O N i ~,~JJL~j~J O CO o ' J naAt»acin x~cnnn~~acNn~ Asa ~ cnw actia~n ciu ~ • 0 Brian J. Wetzel DBA Gelato Cafe' Never Owner 6/2/08 Assets Liability Personal net worth $58,000.00 $ - Start up Cash $25,000.00 $ 50,000.00 Inventory $2,000.00 $ - Equipment $20,000.00 $ - Total $105,000.00 $ 50,000.00 Net Worth $ 55,000.00 ~~~ C~~ ~-.~ _~~ R ~ ; ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~; S'~ n ~ a ~.`.` i : tl ~- ~ 4 - ~ ~~ . • 1 A ~ ~ d ~ ; j ; ~' i ' ~ L.~, p d j ~~ ~ ;. p ~ I r a i i ~ ~ i ~ t $. ~p ; ~ S z ~, j`, ~ t? f y ' ~ .. ~ ~~, ~ s ~ e ~ I ~ ~ , ~~ s ~ ~ ~ f ~ # (~ ~ ~; ~ i i ~ i : ., .1 ~l~ ~ s1 ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~+ ~ i , 1 -i+~ ~f: + r ~~ ~' ~ ~' M ~~1ri } ~ ~ 11. f I it ,~ '1 ;, yi. 1 ~ ~ t. ~ ~ I I'. i (i ,. ~S ~ l 1 ~ i f' ~ i; -. r ~4 i t •( i~ i t ~~E °} '; i ' if ~ _ 1~ F, if. ~ i ~ 1 I5 ; . f Ir . r it ~~ S I t i' r ~ L ~ _ t' 4 ;; ;. ~ ~ ~, 4' i ~' S ~ i i. a :. ~ ~ _ ~Pr-~.~-~ ~ ~. ~~ fe,`~~ ., l~n~ ~~ ~~~~; '~.. 3 -"~ ~° ~. C • June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-N REQUEST Transfer of Owner for Beer License from Gelato Cafe, LLC to Brian Wetzel AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: see attached CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY 1~ ~L CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meeflngs shall become properly of the City of Meridian. 4 F ~ ~ i~ e T ~ ` ~ _ ~` r ~~ ~ s , 1 3 ~' } F ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~t ' ~ i ~ i ~ 1' '' 4 i ~~1' ~ } ~ ' i~% ~ ~ ~y ~° ~ ' '' t ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ i ;; ~ ~, ,, ; ~ I , ,~ ~' ~ ~ I~ i r X ~r r ~ q ~ ~ •. ~ , F p ~~- Rk 333+ t~ ~ ~ ' A I I } i ' ; ~ f ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ U fir, r ~; ~ ~ ' } ~ ~ ~ i L ~ ! f i~ S , ~ ~ _ ~ i~ ~E i ~ a rs: r y~ r t .# 1 , . ~ ;' ~ f ~. ~ - ,; ~ t i~ I~ ;~ ~ ,~I, ~~ ~ ~ i,, : ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~i+ ~~ ' ~~ j.: s ~1; ~ ~.. ~ ~ ~ i: ~: .~. ~ ~ i i u y.~ , ~ 1. ; ~ - ~ ~ # 7, ~; i y ~ - r f {I~ - S 1 . ,~ i f ; . ~}AA • • June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 5-O REQUEST Right of Way Easement Agreement (Traffic Signal] with Ada County Highway District for Meridian Fire Station No. 5 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY See attached CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: ~®~ CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: AAatedals presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~: r:; c y , : t ~,~ I ` a f,< . ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ r ~ ~ ~~ t, ~, ~ a i ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ k(, 4 i ; i v t dL ~ i f` ; .~. 5 ~ ~ ~ £ ~ ~ i 1 L E ~ 3 :{ ~ r 31 I ; f ~ E` s ~ n f ~~ ' 1 ~,~, ~ { 2r 6~~~ ~ ~n ~ r „ir a: ~ t , r ._ t t 3` ~+ t ~ t ~ ~ t E .'~~'e{. ~ ~1r I ~ ~ _ ~ s ~ ~~ ., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fm ~ ~ ~ ~, j i y _ k { A ~ c. ~ ~ € ~ ; ~ ~ B 3~ ~ ~ ~ 1}}$i11 ~ H { ~ i ~ T ~ ~ f ' }} { c i . Y A Nl .~ ~ r yyr~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~3 l~ ~I ~~ ~ 7 t~ ~ E i]. T ~ 7i g 1 A iiR : L:~ 1~ L ff f {~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ 999 t t 1 t~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ )) i kk C § G jj 1 s ~,~~ d. I t {{1 ,;~dA ~~; ~, 9 ~ ~ l: ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. D~NAVAAflO AM~UNt .00 7 601SE IDAHO 01110/06 02:51 PP11~r ii II11 111 11 DEPUTY Vlc~ Allen I~I ('Il~~~~~~~~~~"II~~~~11~~~~~ ~1 ~~~ RECORDED-REQUEST OF 108079228 ACRD 'f4N R I W Sec 25 Meridian Fire station b5 MCLC-07-225 (Reserved for Ada County Recorder) RIGHT-0F-WAY EASEMENT AGREEMENT (Traffic Signal) THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT AGREEME T (Traffic Signal) ("Agreement"), is made and entered into this ~ day of , 2008, by and between LYNX INVESTMENTS, L.P., a California limited artne ip, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR," THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, a body politic and corporate of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "ACRD." WITNESSETH: FOR GOOD AND SUFFICIENT CONSIDERATION IT IS AGREED: SECTION 1. Recitals. 1.1 GRANTOR owns the real property located in Ada County., Idaho more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Servient Estate"). 1.2 ACH`D owns and has exclusive jurisdiction over the public rights-of- way and Highways (as used in this Agreement, the term "Highway" is as defined in Idaho Code, section 40-109(5)) located in Ada County, Idaho and including the Highways which abut and adjoin the Servient Estate (the "Dominant Estate"). 1.3 CITY and ACH'D desires to obtain an easement on, over and across the Servient Estate for the benefit of the Dominant Estate for the purposes hereinafter described, and, for the consideration and on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, GRANTOR is willing to grant such easement to CITY and ACRD. SECTION 2. Grant and Authorized Use. 2.1 GRANTOR hereby grants to CITY and ACRD an easement for the following uses and purposes, and no others: To place traffic signal poles and hardware and traffic detection loops (hereinafter the "Traffic Signal") on, under and over the Servient Estate, and access to construct, install, repair and maintain the same, as such Traffic Signal is depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. 2.2 This Agreement does not extend to The City of Meridian and ACRD Traffc Signal Easement -Page 1 42795.0005. t 20S73S.2 w ~ ~ ~ ` ~ I1 ~ J. ~ rr j ~~1 y YES5E f E2 t a I , F 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ i.4 ~ i. ' ~ ~ i ~ ul i E i ~ rR` ' ' ~ i ` I ~ ~` {{ i t l i , i ~ ~ ri?" ~ ,,. ~ ~ ~ ~ IMF ~ ~ ~~ _+ v k ~ - ~ ! ~ { ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ,~ i E ' ~ ~ f'I } _, ~ _ ,~ ' ~ ~^~ t ~ + s I ~ E~ ~ ~#~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ) i i § ~~, ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ f € ^ ~ r ~~ ~ ~ ~ 3~ i ~ i Y i i~ ~: • • the right to use the Servient Estate to the exclusion of GRAN~'OR, and ACHD's rights. under this Agreement. are subject to the rights of the GRANTOR and GRANTOR'S tenants, contractors, employees, agents, customers, licensees, .invitees, successors end assigns to use the Servient Estate and landscape and irrigate the same, provided the structural and operational integrity of the Traffic .Signal is not compromised .by such activities, and further that such other uses do not interfere with the abili#y of ACRD to repair and maintain the Traffic Signal. SECTION 3. Construction and l~nstallation. All costs and expenses related to any design, installation, construction, repair, maintenance or relocation of the Traffic Signal shall be the sole responsibility and obligation of, and shall be paid by CITY. SECTION 4. Compliance- with the Law. In installing, constructing, repairing and maintaining. the Traffic Signal,. ACRD covenants and: agrees to comply with any and: all federal, state and' focal statutes, laws and oniinanc~s and good engineering practices. SECTION 5. Indemnification, CITY and ACRD shall indemnify and hold GRANT'OR~ harmless for, #rom and against and hereby releases GRANTOR with respect to any and all liens, claims, demands liabilities and expenses (including, without. limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and- reasonable attorneys' fees on any appeal), under this Agreement. arising: directly or indirectly from or in any way connected with the use of the Servient Estate. SEC_ TIO.N 6. Term::Easement Runs with .Land. The term of this Agreement and the easement herein granted is perpetual and it shall be a t~urden upon the Servient Estate and shall run with the land; .provided, however, that the removal of the Traffic Signal and the failure- of ACRD to replace the sarn~ within one (1~) year thereafter shall entitle GRANTOR to receive from CITY and ACRD on demand their executed and acknowledged instrument of release and abandonment to GRANTOR. SECTION 7. Exhibits. All exhibits attached hereto and the recitals contained herein are incorporated :herein as if yet forth in full herein. SECTION 8. Sutxessors and- Assigns. This Agreement, the easement herein granted, and the covenants and agreements herein contained shall inure to the benefd of and be binding upon the- parties hereto and their successors and- assigns to the Servient and Dominant Estate. SECTION 9. Recordation. This Agreement shall be recorded in the Official Real Property Records of Ada County, Idaho. CITY shall be responsible for paying recording costs and shall provide: GRANTOR with. a conformed copy of this Agreement after it has been recorded. . SECTION. 10. No Liens. Neither CITY nor ACMD shall permit any liens ~to stand against the Servient Estate for any work done or materials furnished in connection with the performance of any work by CITY or ACRD, or their agents, contractors or employees. Traffic Signa! Easement -Page 2 aves.ooos.~aos~ss.a • e SECTION 11. Miscellaneous. The easement herein granted is subject to alt easements and encumbrances of record and is nonexclusive provided. any, later granted easements shall be subject to CITY's and ACHD's rights and uses. The captions and headings in this Agreement are for reference only and shall not be deemed to define or limit the scope or intent of any of the terms, covenants, conditions or agreements con#ained herein. IN WITNESS WHERE.OF,, the undersigned have caused this basement to be executed the day, month and year first set forth above. GRANTOR: LYNX INVESTMENTS, L.P. a California limited Partnership Grego uarte General Partner Attest: ~,~;,~~~iu~~y,~,~ CITY: ~oq,~~'~.~''~. CITY OF MERIDIAN ~P"_ o a~~t - ~ i ,r ,,Q 7~T ~~ • ~ 1 ACRD: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ~y: Gary Inselm ,Manager Traffic Signal Easement -Page 3 42795.0005.1205735.2 ~{ ~ ; I ~ t t ~'~`' ~ t I ~ j ` a t } i i ~ i ~ i tt 'i ~ ~ ~ i ` 3F ~ r C f I ~ ~' ~ ~ ; ~ s } 5 C ' ~ t ' S ~ ` ,} ~' 1~ ~ ~ } ~ ~~ ~ A. ~ ~ ~ ~ j[ 7 , . f t l YG E ,1 t ti e!!! - 3 1 ~ , 1 ' ~ S ~ S7 1 ~ ~ ~ f w. ) ~ `` IIIII~' S ~ i k d ~i ~ t ~ l r ~. E 1{I ~ r ~q "I 14,1 ~ t i . I E ,~ ~ g [[[ ~ ~k i ~ ~ ,~ s i ~ ~ E g f F k ` ' ~ ~~ l 3 F ~ ~ ~ ~,~ 5 t ~ ~ ~ F- ~ € ; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 4 E xx E° ~ ~ €6yY [4e ' {n ~~ k 1 ~ ~ ~ {' ~. f- ~ ~:~ €~ ,E ke i s 4 1 { • .r-, State of Galifemia ) ~, ) ss. County of ~~\ ) On this ~ .day of ~~~ in the year 2008, before me, C . , a Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho, personally appeared Gregory T. Huarte, Manager, known or identfied to me to be the General Partner of the limited partnership that executed this instrument and the General Partner who executed this instrument on behalf of said limited partnership, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in said partnership name. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official. seal the day and year in this certificate _ first above written. ' aP,~~pN C ,Rgc~S- _ _ -•- Notary Pu lic for the State of EaNlomia- ~., 'wQ ~,G . Residing at ~~bt~n ,~1~ sr'l~ _ . • . _ jn • My Commission expires ~~ b ,2~ 1~T, STATE OF IDAHO ss. County of Ada ) `~` On this J~~` day of ,~~~ ~- in the year 2008, before me, I('lF'f~ ~Y1.<._'~VP~ _ , a Notary Public in and for ~e State of Idaho, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd, known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Meridian, the municipal corporation that executed and attested the within instrument, .and acknowledged to me that they executed the same, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, t have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above wri#ten. .• GRE~',~•. • ;~ `. • • .~ ~ ~ • :H: z ~a .~, ~ 1' .~ •.~S;r,~~ o. Traffic Signal Easement -Page 4 No#ary Public for Idaho Residing at: ~°a1r~ t~ I ~ ,._ My commission expires: .!0-~j-I 42795.0005.1205735.2 f~ ~ ~ b ` ~~ ~ ~~ ~ I. ti ~ '~ ,~ ,; x,~ ~ h ~ ~~ ~ t E ~` ~ ~ °A It ~ f ~~ ~ I ~ ~ f ~ ~ ;~~; ~. ~ ` r '.k ;~ 3 ~~ t I. t ~ ~ ~ i 3 a , ~ ~ ~ I..: ' ~ ~~1 i ~ - `~~~ - ~ ~ t ` ~ li ~ .: E ',~ ~ dl ~ }i ~~ w ~ f.'. 1 ~ y~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~8 j !. ~ i t P ~ ~ r ~ ~. v Y t k ~} ~ ~ :f~ t~.~ ~ a ~ C Y ~ 7 t s, ~ i ~ ~ f f. ~ ~ ~ ~e~ ~ k ~ . ~ l ,' ~ .. ~~ I i ~ ~, I ( 1 ~ 1. ; ~ , i 1~jl ~ ~ ! S~ , ~~ ~ k i ~ ~ t_ i 3 i ~ '~ y fi' ~ ~ k G. ~ ~ 1 {. C t d x p ~ ~ i [ } ~ 1i ~ t~l ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~! F I ~ ~ i ) ~~ ~ i.~ ~M ~ E ~ p 1 STATE O~ IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) 5~ On this day of in the year 2008, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho, personally appeared Gary Inselman, known or ident~ed to me to be the Manager of Right of Way and Development Services of the Ada- Couniy Highway District, the person who executed this instrument of behalf of said District, and acknowledged .to me that the Ada County Highway District executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, !have hereunto set my hand and affixed my offrcial seal the day and yearfirst above written.. Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: flAy commission expires: Tra#tc Signal Easement -Page 5. a2~es.~os.,2as~ss.2 k ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ Lp S a ~ r ~ _ l f ~~` ~ ! 1 I ~ f ~y ~ Q r . ~ T 1 J ~:' r_ y ~ ~ ~ ~ . : t Y~ Y t ~ , ,, . ~ i ~• ~ i i.; ~ ` ~'~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~~ fi i q ~ : i t~~ ~ , ~ 6 : ~ ~ j3 ^ i ~ ) ~ ~ {g $$ r 1., fi j ~ I ' { Q 4 i ~~i 5 ~ k S s ~r ~ Pi fir' i yr~ itt 1 `~h 4 { ~' ~~ ' ~ ~ .~ 7 1~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ f ~ ~~ r' i ; ~ ~ ,~~~t... ~ °;~ E ~~~ ~ ; ,. ~ fi ~ i~;' ~~ t ~~ ' ' tt ,t ~ 1' ~ i~ ~ ~ i ~ 1 ~ t ~ t t., ~ ~ ~ .} 3 ~ ~ ' a ~ ; ~ f ~ ~ ~ i i ~ p~ ~ + . . E j~ f•~ r ~4 ~. ) ~ ~_ ,,,~ ~ % ~ y.. i i ~ _ 1 ~ t # ~ 4 ' i # _ ~ ( j ~S ~~1 ~ ,a{ } t 1 ~ ~i ~9 ? C t` } [ ~ ~t S gee Sig~~ll Eas~Aiaent ~he`follo~n~:i~:escr~tes a T~'c Si.~ial'Easement Yyng in tl~e~North~e~'Qu~rter of ~ectioa 25', 'I'owus'~~p 41V'o~tTi, R:a~ge 1, VVe~#; $oY$~ Meridiaq, Cry ~~ It~Ieri~an; Ada Cnty,:~c~a~io;: mare ~art%ulai`1y ~escibed as •fallows: ~c~gi~a~ncffi~, pit die i~Tot~.bv4;!est co'r'8etr a.~ s~ict. ~ec$on 25, ~sacci :corner marked .~y fo~d.~luuin.~Gag:monurnei~t;. ~'.~~i~e,, g1Qng the Rlester.~y boundary Sitte of said Sect%n 25;, `Souk 00°55'28'r . ~~est;11~8.~2:f~t;. - Vence; South ;89°'04~'3~2" east, 25:Q¢ feet to ~h~ easterly right ~f:w~y of ~L,inder;Road; "Thencer aTo. sa~:Eastefly rig$.t-off v}-aj?; "p-"~1 nth s~:id l~J'.es#~f~ly ~'oi~iada~y ~i~e; S~au ~a5'S'2:~"'4V'~st, ~:CSG~~t~c~t:~~)+Il'~'~` 47~ ~~~~fiTI~T~; . ~T~e~iCe~~Soutl 7~Q18r~'1" Wit, 2j..8~ i'ezt., Thence, South AQ°00'4U" ~~s~ ti4:64 ~ . Thence; So.~i '~6°SQ'Q2" ~P'e,~t, X2:16 `feet tQ•the ~aster~y~riglit-of v~y of ssid Tinder R.oscl "i7~.ence~ °a3ang said Easterlyrg~t-of way, parallel vvlfli said'Westerl~ bou~clary ~i~ie:af:~~d:~cet~o~.25, ~t[it~tYi 0(i°55''2$" E~.si, ~ 1.62 -feet to die ~-l` Q~' ~]~CG; "The :above descrihed'Tra~c ~ignal'Easemenf contains X5'1 ~gtaai~ feet; 0;413 a~r~s; amore or~less, anti s'subj;eet to ~tnen~;s ~~ r~serit~tini3s. 1G0~ VII. Hays. fit., Suiie 1~2 a Boise, tD 83~~2 ~ Phone;. Z08=863-~4~ J8 v ww~+v.accur~atesun~eyo~s.cit~? ~ ~ ~} ~ , ~~ 5 ! 1 ~ ~ I j'? ~ p ~ ~ I~. . .. ~ e ~ i ~ ~ ~ I it ;: ~ ~ ~ d I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ! • ! : i I 9 ~ ~ ~Ett + ~ I~'~ { >' ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ jJ ~ ~ >.,.. ~ ~ ~ :~ ~ ~ x. ~ ~ I f` ~ k t. 'i ~ ~ E'R'~ '~ ~ ' ~ t~ ' i 'f ~ ~'~ 1 ~ ~ { l~ ig ~ ~' ~ ' 6 ~ '~ e i i ; F ~~ ~ t ~.I~ i ~ e I ~ ~ ~ ' s i t } ~ ~ i ~ i ~ _ ~ ~ BFI ~ ~ ;fii~ ~ ~ r x } I ~~,~' S ; ~' i ~ r ~ c L} i ~ ~"' .. r I,~ ~1 0 OR - •.~.JEXTyB~T Z w ~, ~ o ~ Q Z q a v 'ca .~ . I ~ e.~z . ~~ .N v e ~ ~ ..~ ~~ ~ b~ ~y~ - 00 • ~..~ G~: °S• ~' ~ ~.~. N N ,.00'd.SZ - -, -,- °` i ai. O#~D?J i~'U~11 M (,00"~O.~Z .l~l •a$2,~5~.F~0 s~: _ . ~~ . ~ . - ~^~ J t ~ ~} '` t' 2 z ~ ti Z Z'~4, , C1 ¢ ;N O _~ ~~ $ ~ .- C Q ~ ~ o ld ~~ ~~~'~, ~F-. ~ ~ ~ Q ~] Lil ~` ~ ~` ~r;~ ~ w o \_ \~ ~ ~. o ~~ ~ 2' fit ~ z uo O~ ~ ~Q, W et °~' ~~r~~` 'tom*• (/1 ~~ ~.:~ ~,1 Z, .p .'o ~ c~ ~ m ~ ~ . +.d ',~N. Q C v a ~, ~~ ~~ ~~ =Q _~ -~ 7 ' U' ,~ ~ !. GIs ~: ~` O' O .:~ m (,Q0'p~Z _ 3 Ff .10'7 1 31~07f1 L!• 'o!V ~ -~- ~n •o. L. Q ~` O 01 lJ OO G d 0¢ rd' iC: tC "tN 0 '$. L.I ~W '~i,t ,li'.t ;W 't+i l'iy lit ' b ~ 'd~; r~ ~ o C. g cv c~ 2 r ' ~ v ~m ~ b ~ o ~ 4? ~ ; ~, a o .cn v rn ~ '~ o co 0 ~ o o o c co n, o n, o tI~ . UJ N ~ fA' (n Z ; Z Z w z ~ . .^ J N J - M J ~ J ~ J~ ~ ..J ~: ~. ~:. .J . ~ ?d ~I) -~. •1'07 ~O 2 • ~ s; ~N m d- O 4; ~ .H O z a: ^:. hT .~p, ! .._. i k n'i ( ~ " b,. ~ ~ ~~ 1 1 ~I Y ~ ~ ~ ;~ ' ! 1, f ~~ 4 ~ ~ t i ; ~ ~ ~ k ~ k I S : R ~~i ~ i k ~,, . ~ { i ~ ~ 4 ~ % ~ ~~ ~ i ~ ,# k ~ ~ 1 1 ;~ , ~ 1 I t ~ ~ ~ 1 € ' 1 ~, ,SS' X3 ~ 1 t 1 :{ 1 [ E ( ~ ~ ~ I C r 5 ~ s {. 4' ~ f ~ 1 , I( ' ~ ~ ~ g ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ' 1 ~ ~ ' ~ ~~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s ~ r; { '~ ~ i i `{SI ~ ~ ' ;~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ 9 , i ~ E 1 ~ _ ~ f ~ ~ ~ 7 t { i f yzi I k 'p ~` ~ ~ F 1 ~ I 1 ~ j~. . i ; ~ ~ k ~ ~ ,3 + } . t~~i ~ E l , }! pp 0 ~4 ~ p ;~y i ~ a ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ i . f it 1 i f 6 ~ • , C ~ 6 ~p, 99 ~ l i E ; ~ e ~ t ~ ~ . - f i ~ f~ 3 o- ~ i t ~ k v 1: 1 c. E~ f f ~ . 4 ~ . 1 G ~~ ~ ~1 ~ [ 4 9 - ~ 1 , ~ ~ . i' ~ ~ ~ ~ z~ ~ S ~ L i S ~'it~e.< ~[~~-Qfi'~.~5)1VI~.~}~n 'Hire S'~a~o~ No. ~ - I.~itide~ Yto~~ T~afe~ 0~1-Q9 X00$ Scaf~ 1 ~1c~i 5 t ~~'e. 'Traffic 5~~~ F~aseniel~t~des~ ... . T-ractlt 0:013.Acres: 55~;Sq Feet:.Elosui~ ='s4`7.30U'7W U.Ol Feed PtEC~si~jh ~11~'1491': ',Perilmeter = 96 Feet 001=5.7~4.180~E,2~:$9 OOS~:76.S~LV~ 22.1:6 ~2=~~ 00(#)Vit 20:04 0:04=I~TQO.S~~3~E'3'1.6~ ' SSs. s 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~: ~ I~ ~~ ~ f t y ~~ % i~:. t ~ i ~ ~ ~ , ~ 5 ~ I~ ~ ~ i ~: ~ ~ q ~ € ` r r ~ nk yI ~ ! (~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 4 ,~t ~ (~ j F ~ ~ r r ~ , _~~ ` ;~ .i f cl. I tt is ~ i t , ~ ¢ ~ A ~ G ~ ; i. 1~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ f K , ~ € r~ ~ t a. ~~ i t ~. ~ J Y~.~ I 'I i ' ~ f ~ } _ ~~t~yp '~ ~ j ~~~ ~~ # ~ ~ i ~ : :~ ~~~ ~# ~ ?' ~ 1, ; { Q ' ~! s a ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~lF ~~ ~ i~ ~ 3, s 5' ~ ` c ~ .} , ' ~ ~ , , ,- { ~~ 3 x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ t19 ' { ' ~ ~ ~ , ~ s i f ~~ ~ t ~ f 1 ~ v ; t ~ , ~ a , ]< q ~ ~ f • T4N RIW Sec 25 Meridian Fire Station #5 MCZC-07-225 • (Reserved for Ada County Recorder) RIGH'C-OF WAY EASEMENT AGREEMENT (Traffic Stgnat) THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT AGREEMENT (Traffic Signal} ("Agreement"}, is made and entered into this day of , 2008, by and between LYNX INVESTMENTS, L.P., a California limited partnership, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR," THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipal coeporation of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, a body politic and corporate of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "ACRD." WITNESSETH: FOR GOOD AND SUFFICIENT CONSIDERATION IT IS AGREED: SECTION 1. Recitals. 1.1 GRANTOR owns the real property located in Ada County, Idaho more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Servient Estate"). 1.2 ACRD owns and has exclusiv® jurisdiction over th® p.ublic rights-of way and Highways (as used in this Agreement, the term "Highway" is as defined in Idaho Code, section 40-109(5)) located in Ada County, Idaho and including the Highways which abut and adjoin the Servient Estate (the "Dominant Estate"). 1.3 CITY and ACRD desires tv obtain an easement on, over and across the Servient Estate for the benefit of the Dominant Estate for the purposes her®inafter described, and, for the consideration and on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, GRANTOR is willing to grant such easement to CITY and ACRD. SECTION 2. Grant and Authorized Use. 2.1 GRANTOR hereby grants to CITY and ACRD an easement for the following uses and purposes, and no others: To place traffic signal poles and hardware and traffic detection loops (hereinafter the "Traffic Signal") on, under and over the Servient Estate, and access to construct, install, repair and maintain the same, as such Traffic Signal is depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. 2.2 This Agreement does not extend to The City of Meridian and ACRD Traffic Signal Easement -Page 1 42785.0005.1205735.2 ~F ~]: 3 -~ ~ i ` ;~ 3 u ~ ~ 1 ~, ~ ~ '~ ~ t ~ ~ ~~ ~-„ rt ~ 1 til ~ E 3a p ~. ~ c J t ~ ~ 5 ~ ' + ~ 1 ~ 7: i j ' I I~ [, d~ ~ -~ j ] Y y ~ ~~ i ] ~ ~ (~ ~ I 1 r~ ~ ~ ' {: { i. ~ ~ ~ ~ i p x'i if: i ~ ji r' &~ 3 i ~ . I { i r .. r XX } ~. fs <;' f ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ i , the right to use the Servient Estate to the to thei®ri htsGof th ®GRANTORHan'd rights under this Agreement are subject 9 GRANTOR's tenants, contractors, employees, agents, customers, licensees, invitees, successors and assigns to use the ~o ails n es~ateof the Traffic S gnatr sgnot the same, provided the structural and operat 9 ty compromised by such activities, and further that such other uses do not interfere with the ability of ACRD to repair and maintain the Traffic Signal. SECTION 3. Construction and Installation. All costs and expenses related to any design, installation, construction, repair, maintenance or relocation of the Traffic Signal shall be the sole responsibility and obligation of, and shalt be paid by CITY. SECTION 4. GorYtptiance with the Law. In inand t~ gees '~~ t~~PEY ~"~ any and d maintaining the Traffic Signal, ACRD covenants g radices federal, state and local statutes, laws and ordinances and good engineering p SECTI®N 5. Indemnification. CITY anal h~ eb slrelleases GRANTOR w h GRANTOR harmless for, #rom and against y respect to any and all liens, claims, demands liabilities and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys fees and reasonable attorneys' fees on any appeal), under this Agreement arising directly or indirectly from or in any way connected with the use of the Servient Estate. SECTION 6. Term Easement Runs with Land. The term of this Agre®ment and the easemen# herein granted is perpetual and it shall be a burden upon the Servient Estate and shall run with the land; provided, however, that the remeoa~al~oe` after Kati Signal and the failure of ACRD to replace the same within one (1 } y - entitte GRANTOR to receive from C~ andonmentto GRANTOR heir executed and acknowledged instrument of release an SECTION 7. All exhibits attached hereto and the recitals contained herein are incorporated herein as if set forth in full herein. SECTION g. Successors and Asians. This Agreement, the easement herein granted, and the covenants and rties heret~os ndtheicr stu icc~ssorsllandr assigns ~ of and be brndmg upon the pa Servient and Dominant Estate. SECTION 9. Recordation. This Agreement shall be recorded in the Official Real Property Records of Ada County, Idaho. CITY shalt be responsible for paying recording casts and shall provide GRANTOR with a conformed copy of this Agreement after it has been recorded. SECTION 10. No Liens. Neither CITY nor ACRD shaA permit any liens to stand against the Sentient Estate for any work done or materials furnished in connection with the performance of any work by CITY or ACHD, or their agents, contractors or employees. Traffic Signal Easement -Page 2 42785.0005.1205735.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Es, ~ r ~1 ~~ - ~ ; ~ ~ ff ~I , t'i ~ ~~ '~ ~~ k ~ J ~ j ~ E ii M P r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A :`- ~T" ~r-. F { ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ? , i ~ 4 , r ' f P ~ ~ ~~~ ~ r ~~ 4 , i Z i~ I ~ t~l ~ ~ ~ ~a'~ `' ~ ~ { ~ ~ ~ I~ z z ~ e t 3~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !. ~ i~a ~ p l ~ i ~i 4 ~ ~ E .~~ k i; ( ~ s ~ ~- ! ` F { ~1 I w ; is I ^ . A 1 ,OR EX H I131'l ~$,~~ ~' s" e"' ~e ~~~ -~ ~~~ o-~ ~~ F, ~} ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ a 'o ~..~, ~ ~~~~m o :~ ,a~,~ ~ ~; i~ N `:~ o f~,~ ~ . o~ ~ w~ ,~ ~ ~ !~ . . ~ ~~ ;~. o -~ erx io . ~L'C9'l j '~_._.. - - - - - - ~ - - - cv cY ,fJFJ 05~ " - - z°Q J ,~- Qb'O2~ ~4Nl7 f ~l ~:~ ~; ~,:. ~w ~. ~~~~,, 9 s. ~ ~ ~ Q p ~ ~ /4 U ~ .fl ~ ~C? j` tD ~~~~,~ ;~ ~ Si- ~ ~~~ ~~Q~~~ a~ ~ ~~ ~ Z Ezt ~.~.~~~~ O- '~ 0. ~ ~ tq' ' ~~ ~T=~~~ ~' w ~ ~- z ~Q~~ca ~ ~ ~; ~j O ;~ ~ a F,. C O ,zQ ~~ ~~ ~`~ ~' 0 ~, ,~ ti 4 ~~ _~ ~. ~~L~:O'k3~ ~. ~8~.,~- x,.0(3 N~ ~;~ ~d7 ~.x~i , ~£' X07 t J,I,~d7s t6 'alb ISl~tOB~1.5 cF ,.. ~ 2 o, ~r o. o a a° V ~ ~ ~ z ~ w ~ z ~ ° ~ Q o ~ ~ , ~ m ~ °~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ o ~ . } ~ ~ ~ a J ~ } 9 f ~' ` + 'Take: ~ {~:~~~} ~~~ ~ ~.~~ ~Ts~; 5: - ,T:~c~e~ S~a~~: ~. ~ 5 ~~~t Fi~~: T~~.c ~3gzial er~ent.d~s ?'rata .1.: t~.a1 ~ 1~ar~: S5'7 sq ~e~~ k^lr~su'~ ^ s4'~ 3D~'7vv ~,(}1 Feed .1?Pecision ~lll 141: Perimeter = ~& Feet f?Q1=S7~.I'~i2~.21.`8'9 OQ~=S7~.Sf~2VJ ~2.1:fi ,, t ~ ~ { ~~ E ~ ~ ~ i ~_ ~ ~ j. - ~~ 3 v. D~ i ~ ` ~~ ' ~ ~ i ~; E P ~ , ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ' Yr ~ ~ 1 ' ~ r ~-i L ~ ~. ~' pp ~~. i { ~ I ~ ;~ ~ 1 ~'+ ~~~~:- P ~ ' ~6 -fit 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ C ~ ! } , ~ , A ~ 4 ~ ~ 5 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ i r ~ # _ _ ' " r r ~ ~ i i F ~ t t ~ C, i ;' ~ ~~: 4' '3 g 3 1 1 ~ C t, ~ d i ~ ~ ~,l , .w R '~a ~ ;~t; ~~ ~~ ~s ~ ~ r 3 E 6 N ~ ; ~ +~ 't i , ~ ~ } ~ f z z~ ~~ ,s , n r~ x f. ! 33 f~ _ ~~ ~~~~ CHD ~ianvnvr~"et+~~a ~ic~ TO: Tara Green FROM: Nan Hills SUBJECT: Traffic Signal Easement July 11, 2'008 Right-of-Wcry & Development Services Tara, Enclosed please find an executed recorded copy of the Right-of--Way Easement agreement for the Meridian Fire Station No 5 for you files. Thanks again for all you assistance. Nan 4~~ ~ ;. ~;. ~ }~ < ~~ k~~ t~ ' 'I ~~' ~ ~ 6 t 3 ~ ~ ~ ' i > ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~} ~ ~ t ft I ~ t:1 {i~ R a ~ ~ ~ e.k ~i~ ~ I ~ ' 'C ' , ~ { ; ! 'i° I r I - , ~ r ,,, ~- n i ~ ' i ~ ~ i i I ! ~ I d ~ '~I i fi ~ ~.;~ t4 ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t'• _ ~ ~ I t I~ t i' i 1' I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7{~~ ~ ~ . k. ~ ~ @ I ~i I I ~ -. ~ ~ , ~ ~ I b ~~~ ~ t , ~.. )) l ' ~ ' 'I'4N R 1 W Sec 25 Meridian Fire Station HS MCZ,C-07-225 ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. DA AVARRO AMOUNT .00 1 BOISE IDAHO 01/10/08 02:61 P~ DEPUTY Vlcld Allan III I'II'I~I~I'III'illl'II'I'IIII II ~II RECORDED-REQUEST OF ACRD 1080 r 9228 ~~ (Reserved for Ada County Recorder) RIGHT-0F-WAY EASEMENT AGREEMENT (Traffic Signal) THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT AGREEME T (Traffic Signal) ("Agreement"), is made and entered into this ~r*~ day of , 2008, by and between LYNX INVESTMENTS, L.P., a California limited artne ip, hereinafter r®f®rr®d to as "GRANTOR," THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, a body politic and corporate of the State of Idaho hereinafter referred to as "ACRID." ' WITNESSETH: FOR GOOD AND SUFFICIENT CONSIDERATION IT IS AGREED: SECTION 1. Recitals. 1.1 GRANTOR owns the real property located in Ada County, Idaho more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the °Servient Estate"). 1.2 ACRD owns and has exclusive jurisdiction over th® public rights-of- way and Highways (as used in this Agreement, the term "Highway" is as defined in Idaho Code, section 40-109(5)) located in Ada County, Idaho and including the Highwrays which abut and adjoin the Servient Estate (the "Dominant Estate"). 1.3 CITY and ACRD desires to obtain an easement on, over and across the SEarvient Estate for the benefit of the Dominant Estate for the purposes hereinafter describbed, and, for the consideration and on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, GRANTOR is willing to grant such easement to CITY and ACRD. SECTIION 2. Grant and Authorized Use. 2.1 GRANTOR hereby grants to CITY and ACRD an easement for the following uses and purposes, and no others: To place traffic signal poles and hardware and traffic detection loops (hereinafter the "Traffic Signal") on, under and over the Servient Estate, and access to construct, install, repair and maintain the same, as such Traffic Signal is depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. 2.2 This Agreement does not extend to The City of Meridian and ACRD Traffic Signal Easement -Page 1 42785.0005.1205 73 S.2 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ t'' t, ~ r i ~ I ~ f g ~ ~ I ~ '' I ~ ~ ~r~. i e ~ ~ i i .. ~ ~ ~~~~; ~ , ~ s ~ i ~ ' ~ i a: ~ ~ :3 ~ ~ i _. ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ F ~ t ~~ ~ ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ ;~ :~ ~ ~ I { ~ ,. I ~ ~~ ~ I I :1 ~ n ~ f i . (p ~` ~ I ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ' I~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ I{ ~ ~ g ' ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ "' ~. ' t ~ ~ e ~ . ~ <i f ~ ~ . s ~ p ~ '_~~ ~ ~~~, ~ 8 ~ ( ~ ; ~ ~~ ~ , ' 1~ } i k~fs C _~ . a ~ a ~~ i ~ 1 ~ , (~ t k.' ~ r t '. ~ i ~ ~ I Foi" ~ :~ ( ,f I ~ I the night to use the Servient Estate to the exclusion of GRANTOR, and ACHD's right; under this Agreement are subject to the rights of the GRANTOR and GRAINTOR's tenants, contractors, employees, agents, customers, licensees, invitees, successors and assigns to use the Servient Estate and landscape and irrigate the s~~me, provided the structural and operational integrity of the Traffic ,Signal is not compromised by such activities, and further that such other uses do not interfere with the ability of ACRD to repair and maintain the Traffic Signal. SECII"ION 3. Construction and Installation. All costs and expenses related to any design, installation, construction, repair, maintenance or relocation of the Traffic Signail shall be the sole responsibility and obligation of, and shall be paid by CITY. SECI{'ION 4. Compliance with the Law. In installing, constructing, repairing and maintaining the Traffic Signal, AGHD covenants and agrees to comply with any and all federal, state and local statutes, taws and ordinances and good engineering practices. SECT::"tON 5. Indemnification. CITY and ACHD shall indemnify and hold GRAPJTOR harmless for, from and against and hereby releases GRANTOR with respect to any and all liens, claims, demands liabilities and expenses (including, without. limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and reasonable attorneys' fees on any appeal), under this Agreement arising directly or indirectly from or in any way connE:cted with the use of the Servient Estate. SECT"ION £. Term; Easement Runs with Land. The term of this Agreement and the easement herein granted is perpetual and it shall be a burden upon the Servient EstatE~ and shall run with .the land; provided, however, that the removal of the Traffic Signal and the failure of ACHD to replace the same within one (1) year thereafter shall entitle GRANTOR to receive from CITY and ACHD on demand their executed and acknowledged instrument of release and abandonment to GRANTOR. SECTION 7. Exhibits. All exhibits attached hereto and the recitals contained herein are incorporated herein as if set forth in full herein. SECTION 8. Sucxessors and Assigns. This Agreement, the easement herein granted, and the covenants and agreements herein contained shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their successors and assigns to the Servient and Dominant Estate. SECTION 9. Recordation. This Agreement shall be recorded in the Official Real Property Records of Ada County, Idaho. CITY shall be responsible for paying recording costs ,and shaft provide GRANTOR with a conformed copy of this Agreement after it has been recorded. SECTION 10. No Liens. Neither CITY nor ACHD shall permit any liens -to stand against the Servient Estate for any work done or materials furnished in connection with the pt3rformance of any work by CITY or ACRD, or their agents, contractors or employees. Traffic Signal Easement -Page 2 42785.0006.92057352 • SECTION 11. Miscellaneous. The easement herein granted is subject to all Basemen#s and encumbrances of record and is nonexclusive provided any later granted easements shall be subject to CITY's and ACHD's rights and uses. The captions and headings in this Agreement are for reference only and shall not be deemed to define or limit the scopE, or intent of any of the terms, covenants, conditions or agreements contained herein. iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Easement to be exec~rted the day, month and year first set forth above. GRANTOR: LYNX INVESTMENTS, L.P. a California limited Partnership Grego uarte General Partner Attest: ``,``~~~~,,,~~ui~+a~~a,~ CITY: OF a ~'~ '';CITY OF MERIDIAN o ;~ ~ ~ ,~ ~. ~ T 1~ ~~ '~~~~~ii~ruu~ n ~N~N~s ACRD: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ~y: Gary Inselm~ ,Manager Traffic Signal Easement -Page 3 42795.0005.1205735.2 F ` ~ ~ ~ r ~ C ~ ~ ~ I f ~' j f G ~ ' t ~ ~~ ` F ;~ I ~.. b i f ~ ~ ~ y M! t ~ ~ ) ~# ~y` ~ ! I I ~ ~ ~ A- 111 ~ + ~ ~ ~ f E ! ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ' 1 t € ~ I ~ ~ i` I ~, 1 f _ ~ ~ { t( ~ , ~ ~ ~ . r~ ~ l r, 'I ' ~ ~ P ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ .: ~ . 1 ~ ~ u ~ ! ~ } 7 f ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ jj 7 ~~ ' ~ ~ x 'S ~ ' ~ ~ ~ I I p p ~ t ' t (~ ;. ~ F i .~g t P Q ( ~ ~ ~ ~~ { ; ~ ~ I . i 4 ttt .; ~i ~ ~~ r I ~ R r ~ ; i ~ ~ F _;~ . {:. t'e ~ ~ , i ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ . , { ' ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ; ~~ ~I ~ ~~ ,, ~ ~ k ~ `` . ~ ~ I ~ 4 ' ~ i I : 3 ~ ~ • ~d,~-u~ State of Gal~ifemia ) 1 ~, ) ss. county of ~~\ ) On this ~~ day of ~~'~ in the year 2008, before me, ~ ~ ~~ , a Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho, personally appeared Gregory T. Huarte, Manager, known or identified to me to be the General PartnE;r of the limited partnership that executed this instrument and the General Partner who executed this instrument on behalf of said limited partnership, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in said partnership name. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seat the day and year in this certificate first above written. NpN C R9c ~~~'•OTq ••~y '~•~ Notary Pu lic for the State of Ealifomia- k~l~ ,~- ~• AG@ ~~G Residing at ~ ~ s • My Commission expires~$~.~° to ~ ~, l~r~OF~ID~N~.. ~ ~~ ~ STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss. Count)/ of Ada ) `~ On this ~d~ day of ~~~n ~-- in the year 2008, before me, I~u' ~`~ X11.- °a~~ , a Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd, known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Meridian, the municipal corporation that executed and attested the within instrument, and acknovtiledged to me that they executed the same, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, f have hereunto set my hand and affnced my official seal the da~~ and year firs# above written. .•~ C~~11r'•. .ARy ~' ~. s ~ ~ • Q+, ~ • :~~z ~ • ~. • e i • '`•;5;~'~TE; ~~~ Traffic Signal Easement -Page 4 Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: ~°~IC~I,L:~L I I1~ My commission expires: ICi -~~- ~ 42785.0005.1205735.2 • STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss. Countjv of Ada ) On this day of in the year 2008, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho, personally appeared Gary Inselman, known ar ident~ed to me to be the Manager of Right of Way and Development Services of the Ada County Highway Dis~ict, the person who executed this instrument of beha{f of said District, and acknow{edged to me that the Ada County Highway District executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affuced my official seal the day and year first above written. Pub{ic for Idaho Residing at: My commission expires: Traffic Signal Easement -Page 5 42795.0005.1205735.2 Notary r • ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _, -~. u `'. - ,' ~ ~ r ~/ Traffic Signer Easement The following: describes a Traffic Signal Easement lying in the Northwest Quarter of Section 25, 'Township 4 I~Tazth, Ttange l West; Boise Meridau, City of Meridian; Ada Catnty, Idahaa more paztitularly described as foltows: ~o~nfleneiing at the N`art~.west earner of said Section 25, said corner marked vy fdund Aluminum Cap monument; Thence, -along the Westerly boundary line of said Section 25, South 00°55'28" . West, 1168.72 feet; - Thence; South 89°04'32" Easf, 25:OQ feet to the Easterl~r right-af-way of Lindex Road; Thence, along said-Easterly rig'Txt-a~ way, pazallel wig said Westerly boundary line, South dU°55'28" West, 7.66 feet to the ~ ~F ~~~ Thence, South 74°18'Cl7" East, 21..$9 feet; Thence, South 06°00'00"'Nest, 20:64 feet; Thence, South 7b°50'02" West, 22:1f feet to the Easterly right-af-way of said Linder Road; Thence, along said Easterly right of--way, parallel with said Westerly boundary line of said-Section 25, North 00°55'28" East, 31.62 feet to the P~ ~' ~E~ ~; The shave des~rbed'Traf~c Sgaal'Easement contains 55'7 square feet, 0;013 acres; mare arTess, and is subject to all easements and reservations. 16021111. Hays. Sf., Staite 102 p Boise, ID 83702 = .Phone: 248-8&3-x'198 vwwu~.aecuratesuru~yors.crm '~ ;~ :;; .~. 4'.i 3 ' ij G r5 ~-:J ~~ a - ~~ ~~, P . ~t E~ ; i !; l; f ~ s (: I ~ E f` ' ` ~,( ~; i ~, ~ ~' ~ i =a !t g! i . ' 4 f, j i t ;' I 1` ~; ~, , 1, ,dM~ EXHIBIT ~r't yy~0 ~ ~" ~ ~' ~ o z r ~P~ ~ ~ na U N [~t7 Q g~ ~~nw ~ ~~ u~ ~ ~; W W 4 Z ~ n W I Z j p U Q ~~'~ `t ~ ~ W Z ~ °' cQ 4' m ~ ,~ w ~ o. N o ~ ~ 0 0 W ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~,~~~ ~ Z j p q ~~-'~as ~ ar ; ~ ,; m C~12 ~ cY W ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ o"~ e.7 I .~ ~ i , ~ et` ¢ I j tHSy . . ~ ~ . ~r, t E [ ,99'L99Z M „BZ,SSAD S' N N I .0~ a9t' - - - z°° ~ ~ Ob'0~! ~3f1N17 ~° a ~ ~ t r t41 Z Z ~ ~ z ~~~ , t] , ~~ o~~ q .. ~o~q ~ o "~o~c~.~ //c°o ~ }~ cs 4, m e,.r Imo. 1 ',~ 5 ~ ~ ~ h"_~ to ~ ~ ~C `~ ~ ~N a ~ ~O {(O~ ~ ~ z ~~ ~~ v o°~~'~_ ~ ~' ~Q ~ } . ~ m ~ ~+ ~ ~ tl' y ~ _, L-~ ¢ Q 0 ~ .,,f <E ~~ W w~ ©~ ~W 0 v v~ ~ ti O 4 m Z L, ~ E) O (,ao•o~z ~ usz,~~.aa fit} fr£ 107 £'~ 107 ~ Z~ 107 t X,707$ !t 'aht 15G110A05' 1 'o v ~ z° Z N ,, o M m ^d- O m ~~-' 4 ~ ~ i i. ~ ` t r~ g ~.y ~ i ~ ~ ` r ~ j ~111~~H ~ ~ ~ ~ , _ t ~~ j ~? s S! ry~p ~ t t~i ~` ~E F~ ~ .~ S ' ~ ~ I' •'_' ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 F ti ~~ k i ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ .I y r 1 4 @ ~~ ~ ~ ~_i' i i ~: ~ ~ ' {f 1 ( I~ ~ 3 t7 i ~ I ~~ * { ~ r I~ 1 - t ~" ~ ~ ` - r ~ ~ ~ }~ . 'i ~~. 2 9 1~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~' t ,y ,( i~ C'i ~ ~ '~ 1~ f~ ~ ~ , pap { E ~ ~ i ~~- . !. f ~ tk_~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~' ` j' ~ i ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; . i ;~ i ~i ~ i~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ :{ fs ~ +5, ~ ~ i ~ '.~ ~ , ~ d ~ ~~ ~ ° ~' ~ l! ?I g tt iE ! ~r:~~ t ~ g ~'~? t ~ f ~ ~ ~ & + S ~ ~ .~~ ~ .fi6'E£Zl m I N I J ao CU .` ~~ ~ i Title: (I~ICZC-07-225) Meridian. Fiie Station No. 5 -Linder 120ac1 Date: O1.-07-7~1~8 Scale: ~ inch = 5 feet File: Traffic Signal Easement.des Tract 1: Q:013 Acres: 55'7 Sq Feet Cidsure = s47.3(}07w 0.01 Test: Precision =1!11491': Perimeter = 96 Feet p01=S74.I8t37E 21;89 t)Q3=S76.5002W 22.16 002=~OQ..QOQOW 2Q:64 O((?4~N00.5528E 31.62 ~~ ~ ~ : t ~ ~ ~ 4 ' # 4' ~ c - i i . ~ ~ , ' ~ ~ ~ s ~~ r ~ ~~. F r ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ° ~ ~ ' 3- ~ ~ ~° r ~ E ~ 1 F F` y n ~ ~~ i ; ~ ,; a~ ~ ~ i, ~ ~'~ H ~': F k ~ , . i ~ ~ k} '` y E i ~ ~ .` ~ I i t`t ~ ; y r 4 {~: , : i I `~ Si t' ~ ~ ~ i E ~~ t ~~ t ~ ~ r` ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 ' ~` t ~~s R ~ { ~' +' ~` ~ ~ ~ ~~ t ` x ~ t ~ ~ ~ t , ~ t:~ 3'' ~ c' ~ :~~{~ ~ f y 1 i 1~. E. ~ C `~ Jt 1jj i ~ 1 4 ~ , ' 1 ~ ~' '~ ; ti~ ~. ~ ..i ~ ~N T ~ { 41 _ , ~ ~ S ~ ~ 1 ~ tit ! c~ ~ ! E , 4 1, .i - °;~5~ ~ f ~ t ~ 9; , ,. ~ ~ ~ 1 E ~' ~ . 9 ~ f { {' i' Q • June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 200$ APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-P REQUEST Approve Contract Amendment for Senske Lawn & Tree Care, Inc. for the Addition of Services to the Water Division Building 8~ Fire Station No. 5 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See aHached CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: ~^ ~~ (Jl, CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall became property of the Cffy of Meridian. • JUG ~ .~ ~~a~ ~ii=y C)f NTcridia~ pity ~~erk ~f~.ce To: Jaycee Holman, City Clerk ~~ prom: Keith Watts, Purchasing Agent CC: Tara Green, Stacy Kilchenmann, Mike Barton, Steve Siddoway Date 6/12/08 Re: June 17 City Council Meeting Agenda Item The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the June 17 City Council Consent Agenda for Council's consideration. Anaroval of Contrail Amendment for Senske Lawn 8 Tree Care Inc for the addition of services to the Water Division Building and Fre Station #5. Recommended Council Action: Approval of Amendment to Senske Lawn ~ Tree Care for an additional $24,925.00 over the 3 year contract term and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest. Thank you for your consideration. • Page 1 i f ~ ~ x ~ ~ .~ Y ,~ ~ ~ a r} i ~ i ~ ~ t ~ y , 4 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ _ ~'~. Fr {{ l .~ ~ 3 r ?f~ ~ ~ :~ ~ h r ,E .s ,~ ~~~ t ~ 3k ~~ ' ~ '~ { ~ f ~. 4 1 3 ~ ~ ~ t , ' ( ~~ ~ ' ~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ 2 9 , r. r a ~ ~ 1 i ' - ~[ ' . ' t ~ i ;: s . v ~ ~ ~ ~. }; ~ x 1 n ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' st r '~ ~' ~.- j ~ a ~ ~ z ~ , + t ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~. ~ i ~ ~ ~; _ ~? } ~ ~ yr ~ 1 x ; i ~ ~ b E ~ r r v r ~ . r:~ ~ tt {i {~ i ~ t ~~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ 4`- i; t f _ • June 13, 2008 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Mayors Office ITEM NO. 6-A-1 REQUEST Appointment of Steven Yearsley to the Meridian Parks and Recreation Commission AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See attached CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY ~ ~~ CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. E~ 5i { -~ b } ~ f~ I ~ t ~ ~ '`~~ ~ ' ~r~ ~ ~ +aggT ~ ~ ~9 P ~ tr ~ ' 14 k ~ y -~ 1 f ~ ~ t t ~ f ` ~ R f ~ ~ f~ t ~ IF ~ i ~ ; ~ :~ i , y ` i ~ ~ i ~l t ~ T c~:i^ ~ ~ `' 1. ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~', ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ F 17 ~ ~ s a: f ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ f ~' ~~-; p~ ~ I ' II i ~~~ ~ ~ k i y .~ a f 1, ~ ~ ~ ~1 { ~ [ § ' ( 1; 4~ 4 ~ ! ~ s; ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ I i ~ i t I ` < r i;:: i ~ 'r ~ ~ ~ I } ~ ! - ~ 5 ~ f sj ~ ~ f ~ I "i ~ ~ ~ ~ij' ~ f I ~ ~ 5~ ~ ~- . ~ ~ ! gg~ ~ ~ j , ~ z ~. ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ !~ ~ °~ . .'~ ` , ~ 1 ~ ~ r; i~ ~ i f ~ 1# }4'. ~ ~ t i -~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Page 1 of 1 Tara Green From: Jaycee Holman Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 1:04 PM To: Tara Green Subject: FW: Parks Committee Position Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Green Attachments: Meridian Parks Commission 2008-06-09.doc Sony, it's this one. Jaycee L. Holman City Clerk City of Meridian From: Peggy Gardner Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:21 PM To: Jaycee Holman Subject: FW: Parks Committee Position Tammy to appoint to Parks Commission. Peggy Gardner Administrative Secretary to Mayor Tammy de Weerd City of Meridian Phone 884-2468 ext. 204 From: Steven R. Yearsley [mailto:SYearsley@Forsgren.com] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 6:50 PM To: mayortammy Cc: Steve Siddoway; jnesmith@meridianautocare.com Subject: Parks Committee Position Mayor de Weerd, It was good meeting you again at the Renaissance Park Grand Opening. I was pleased at the turnout especially given the cold weather. I think that Renaissance Park will be a great asset for the City. I wanted to let you know that I would like to give back to this great community and working in on the parks committee would be a good fd of my experience and background. Attached is a brief summary of my life and experience. I look forward to talking to you further about the position and hope to be able to give back to the community. I will be out of town for the next two weeks for work and vacation. However, you can reach me on my cell phone at 859-7156. Thanks for your time. Stevens R. lfearsley, P.E. ~ Project Manager ~: : ~',.r. ~:, 415 South 4th Street Boise, ID 83702 Office 208.342.3144 Direct 208.854.8304 Fax 208.383.0819 www.forsgren.com ~earslev@forsgren corn 6/13/2008 Steven R. Yearsley 2961 E. Lucca Meridian, Idaho 83642 (208) 887-9411 OBJECTIVE • I would like volunteer for Park Commission and help in any way I can. VITAL STATISTICS • I grew up in Chubbuck, Idaho. After college I moved to the Treasure Valley. I have spent 7 years living in Nampa and just moved to Meridian in Apri12005. • I have been married for 15 years and have two daughters, ages 10 and 7. EDUCATION/OCCUPATION • I have a Bachelors of Science Degree in Civil Engineering from Idaho State University, 1996. • I currently work at Forsgren Associates, a regional civil engineering firm, as a Project Manager. • I am a Registered Professional Engineer in Civil Engineering in Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and California. COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES • I was a Boy Scout Leader. • I volunteer at the Idaho Center. • I have participated in several community service projects in Nampa, including installing the sprinkler system along the Nampa Green Belt and at the Idaho Center, and helped at a community car wash. RELATED EXPERIENCE • I have participated in and assisted communities in long term planning and understand the importance in planning for the future. • I have 12 years of experience in water and sewer system design, site development, roadway design, and structural design. • I am currently the City Engineer for the City of Bellevue, City of Ketchum, and The County Engineer for Camas County. I work closely with the City and Staff. • I have worked with several Idaho cities, including Nampa, Garden City, Boise, Burley, Rupert and Jerome, in upgrading their water and sewer systems. VISION FOR THE PARKS Working in the engineering field I have seen the trend for larger homes and smaller lots. I see this putting more stress on the City to provide adequate open space and parks for our children to play safely. I think that continued planning for more parks and recreation areas will bring people and business to the area. We need to continue to work with developers and other entities to identify areas for open space and provide amenities that families can enjoy. At the Renaissance Park Grand Opening I was excited to hear about all the summer recreation activities that the City of Meridian offers. I did not know that these programs existed. We need to continue to get the word out to families of these great opportunities. I know that my experience with these other cities will help me on the parks committee to continue the great work the others have done. I would appreciate your consideration of my application to the parks committee. ~ ~ ~~ .~ ~. ~ ~ 9 , t ~ p ` n + 3 ~ fry F ~ ~ t ~+ ! l~ ~~;; ~ F I ~ (~~ Y ~ r ~ ~ . ' ~ ~~ ~~ I ~ ~ li ~ .1 i ~ I- R i ~ i {f I. ~ 3 t{ rl d ,.~33 , ~ 1 ~ d: I~ :F ~ I F 1 ~ I ~ ! i ~ / ~ ~! t ~ ~ f I if {{ ~ s June 13, 2008 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Finance Department ITEM NO. 6-8-1 REQUEST American Wallcover Change Order No. 3 for the City Requested Change in Scope for the Not to Exceed Amount of $10,856.10 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See attached CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: ~ CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SE WER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meddtan. ~~ l,,~ 1," k '' S l,= p ~ i ~~ ~~ ~ ~- ~': ~~~ ,; ~ F ~~ ~ i ~ {~ , ~ i ~' _ ~ : ~. } * '` ., e y r .I ~' ~~ r~ ~' 4 c ~ ~ `' - ~ i ~~. ~ ~ 1: y~~j ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ S i ~ '. ~l ~ ~' ~ ~ F++ 1 ; l ~ z~. k t . ~~ s `; ~ ~ ~ _ ~ a ~E i ~ f ~ e ~ ~- ~ 1 ~ a ~ 1 ~ t ' ~ ~ ? ,~ ° ~ t s t. 9~. 6 ~ ' n ;~ ~ _; ~ I ';'r ~ ~ 3• w ~ {, ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ,., , ~ ~ ~ _~; a. , K F ~ ~ ~ 1~ rl ~ t' t E s, '; _ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~& ~1 ~; ~~ ~ i ~ ~ I ~~~ ', ~ ~ ~ 5 i 1 S. ~ 7i ~ ~ A S ~ ~ i Y F "f }1 }~~ ='. ~ ~ , f 7 .' , ~ . k ~ - x ~ ~ jj ~ f _ If j _. ~ ~ ~} ~, F t CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, ID 83642 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER AMERICAN - Phase 3 Contractor is hereby directed to make the following changes from t~ ~~~ Documetrts and Pkuts. :rtptlon: Incorpcirate revisiorw per AS!'s b1, 72, 81.82. RFPs 88,106,107 & PR001 per attached PCOif3 dated 6J19/08 OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SAME. ion for Change Order. Addidottal scope or +evlsions per Itsted ASrs, RFI's, 8 PR Change order items descriptlon, dated 5N8/~, with contractor quotes CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TiME3: Original COntraCt Price $ 1,038,550.00 Original Contract Times: Substantial Completion 8J28J08 Net charges form previous Change Orders Net changes form pn3vious Change Orders No. 0 to 02 No.,_ to _, (ca~rKiar days) a n inn nn Contract Price Prior to the Chang® Order. Contract Times prior to this Change Order. (calendar days or dabs) $1,048,183.90 8~ Net Increase (decrease) of this Chang® Order. Net Incxease (decease) of the Change Order: $10,858.10 (~~ dew ~~) None Contract Price with all Approved Change Orden;: Contract Times with all Approved Change Orders: (calendar days) S1,OSS,040.00 Substantial Completion 8/28/2008 RECOMMENDED: (CONSTRUCTION G ) ACCEPTED; (CONTRACTOR) Petra Inc. American Walkover By: Thomas R. Co hdn `' By. Date: !p `` d D '~ ~1~~~~ APPROVED; (CITY PUR~iA,SNQ~ A tint trar_n eoatan i ~ t3y: Keith Watts ~~ ~ Date: ~ , +„ O APPROVED: (CITY) - v ~~~ ~~~t°P,~ By: Mayor T my de Wata'idCi~ Data: ~,. ~ _ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~-o City Clerk,`~aycee Holman .~ .~ .~ 11111+++1111 itt1N~~~~~ SEAL Memo To: Jaycee Holman, City Clerk From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Agent CC: Tara Green, Stacy IGlchenmann, Council, Tom Coughlin Date: 6113/08 Re7 June 17 City Council Department Report ~' a~~ty ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ty ~1~~~ ®~~~ The Purchasing Department respedful(y requests that the following item be plaoEd on the June 17 City Council Agenda under Department Report. American Walkover Chance Order #3 Addifional work oer Architect's Supplemental Instruefions °ASI's" #51. 72. 81 82. All work under this Change Order #3 will be completed pursuant to the existing Drywall, Firepn~ofing 8~ Acoustical Ceiling contract dated July 17, 2007. Total contract amount is now $1,059,040.00.00. Budget for this contract is $592,200.00 which we are over by $466,840.00. Recommended Council Action: Approve Change Order #3 to American Walkover for additional Drywall, Fireproofing ~ Acoustical Ceiling work per the attached documentation, for aNot-To-Exc~d amount of $10,856.10 authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest. Thank you for your consideration. • Page 1 i k ~: I ,~(: I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' t ~} i 1{ ~ ` { '. j{ 2 $ f k ~ _ ', ' 1 i i ~~ i ; { „ N ~ ~ ~, ~K ~ ~ i g i f ~ i t~~ ~ ~ ? ~ 1:, i j ~ * 1 ` ~ ' S ~ Y +. 4 F ~ ~ 7 s 8 ~ ~ ~ - ~ ; i C ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ f ~ I h; :. `~^ ~ i ~ r ~ s {{ j 5 !S }'! ~ ,~ E,fiii i; ~ ~ tY E ,, Y ~!} '~s~ f s 5 { l ~F_ I~ f ~ 1 '~ ~~ i ~ t ; ~~ '~ ~ ~ ~~ F F i1 .. ?y ~ ~ 1 t 4 __ ~` }I. .~ 4 ~['~_ ?v l ~, s E; ' a 1 F i` r i' ~, ii ~ ~:. ~ t~ ~ 1 j ~;! r (i ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~, ~ ~-f~ 1 r~ 4 ~ ' F, ~ ~ ~. E a, F ~ ~ ~i i §:~ ~I t ~ ~ ~+ ~ ~ i, ~ :5 f ~ i ~. P, ~ ~ C Ii ~' r ``i ~; ,f-. ( F 'c p `. i i k CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, ID 83642 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER CHANGE ORDER NO. 03 PROJECT NO. CH-0S-001 DATE: 6-5-08 EFFECTIVE DATE: CONTRACTOR: AMERICAN WALLCOVER PROJECT: MERIDIAN CITY HALL -Phase 3 Tenant Improvements ~~ The Contractor is hereby directed to make the following changes from the Contract Documents and Plans. Description: Incorporate revisions per ASI's 61, 72, 81, 82, RFI's 88, 108, 107 8 PR#01 per attached PCO#3 dated 6!19/08 ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SAME. Reason for Change Order: Additional scope or revisions per listed ASI's, RFl's, & PR Attachments: Change order items description, dated rd18/08, with contractor quotes CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMEiS: Original Contract Price $1,038,550.00 Original Contras Times: substantial completion 8/28/08 Net changes form previous Change Orders Net changes form previous Change Orders No. 0 to 02 No._ to _ (calendar days) $9,633.90 None Contrail Pace Prior to this Change Omer: Contract Times prior to this Change Order. $1 048 183 90 (calendar days or date) , , . 8~8~008 Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order. Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order. (calendar days or date) $10,856.10 None Contract Price with all Approved Change Orders: Contract Times with all Approved Change Orders: $1,058,040.00 (calendar days) Substantial Completion 8!28/2008 RECOMMENDED: (corosTRUCnoN GE) ACCEPTED: (cONTlwcroR) Petra Inc. American Walkover By: Thomas R Co hlin `' By. Date: ~p `t ®$ ate: / 1/jI p ^ ~~ ~ f APPROVED: (cmr PuRCFiASING AGENT) COUNCIL APPRO AL By: Keith Watts Date: Date: APPROVED: (Cnl~ - ATTEST: By: Mayor Tammy de Weerd By: City Clerk, Jaye Holman Date: Date: ly' OPOSED CHANGE ORDER No. 00003 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE• (208) 323-4500 • FAX• (208) 323-4507 TITLE: ASI, RFI, PR Pricing Phase III DATE: 5/19/2008 PRO]ECT: Meridian City Hall ]OB: 060675 TO: Attn: Randy Pierce CONTRACT NO: 24 American Wallcover 2685 E. Lanark St. Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208-887-1062 Fax:208-887-1129 RE: To: From: Number: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL **All taxes are included in casts** Item Description Quantity Units Unit Price Tax Rate Tax Amour Net Amount 00001 PR#Ol Mayor Suite Revisions (RFP#02)- Revise 1.000 LS ($624.00) 0.00% $0.00 ($624.00) logtlon & configuration of the Mayors Suite. AWC quote 3/20/08 00002 RFI#88 Roof Screen Wall (COR#20)- Voided 1.000 LS $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 00003 ASI#72 Public Work 8c IT Wall Revision (COR#28)- 1.000 LS $3,819.90 0.00% $0.00 $3,819.90 Revise loption of wall at office #309 & #314, demo existing wall. AWC quote 4/23/08 00004 RFI#104 Beam Soffit (COR#29)- Frame soffit 1.000 LS $1,710.54 0.00% $0.00 $1,710.54 around beams at grids 6 8c 7 between G & H. AWC quote 4/23/08 00005 ASI#518'; 51R RA Duct Opening 8c Transitfon 1.000 LS $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 (COR#32) 00006 ASI#81 Second Floor Office Revisions (RFP#03)- 1.000 LS $3,814.80 0.00°k $0.00 $3,814.80 Revise & add office and conference space on 2nd Public Works & Fire Dept areas. AWC quote 4/29/08 00007 ASI#82 Reverse Door Frame in Rm.130 (COR#31) 1.000 LS $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 00008 RFI#106 Fire Riser Rm.103 ENargement 1.000 LS $1,632.00 0.00% $0.00 $1,632.00 (COR#33)- Dino existing wall Rm.130 & rebuild 15' of new wall. AWC quote 4/23/08 00009 RFI#107 Basement Reshoom Fan Relocation 1.000 LS $502.86 0.00% $0.00 $502.86 (COR#34) Unit Cost: $10,856.10 Unit lax: $0,00 Lump Sum: $0.00 Lump Tax: $0.00 0% GC Markup: $p,00 Total: $10,856.10 APPROVAL: Bx~ -r ' By: ~~~ G~~- sy: P6~~' '~ ~' American Ikover i om rd Conrad Architects Date: `p /f ~~ Date: ~ - /~..o~ Date: ~` ~~~ 8zpe~itioo ~` ~~ '~ t ~: 1, ~' _ ~ ~_.._ ~ t~ I~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ "~ f ~ ~ i g i @ } tsi ~` f ~ f ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ f I ~ i f I ~ 3 I ;y ~ ~ ~ t { f ~ t ~ ~ I ~ ~ p~p ~ (j~,1 ~ ~ k=T 0 ~~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~) ~ y ~ PPP h ~ . R ~ ' 4 ~l I P~ ~] ~ ~ ~ ~ :_ re ~ t ~ i ~ ~ ~~ R; C r ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ) > ~ } i is ~ +(## P ~ ~~ ~ ~ £. ~~ ~ ~ , ~ . 1. ~ ~~ .. } ' i s d i ~ i 4 y !~ l 4 r ~ e' Is t . ~ ~ 1 z ~ ' ~ ~ ~. F (~, . t 1 ~ ~ i sS f ~ ~ 1 ~ r j ,' s ,i ~ ~ , ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ + I t MERIDIAN CITY HALL PROJECT NO: CH-06-001 AMERICAN WALLCOVERING -Phase 3 (24) 05/18/08 CHANGE ORDER NO 3 CHANGE ORDER ITEMS 1 PR 01 Mayor Suite Revisions {RFP-02) (624.00} Revise location >3< configuration of the Mayors Suite. AWC quote 3/20/08 2 RFi 88 Roof Screen Wall (COR#20) VOID 3 ASI 72 Public Work r~ IT Wall Revision (COR#26) 3,819.90 Revise location of wall at office #309 8~ 314, demo e~asting wall. AWC quote 4/23/08 4 RFI 104 Beam Soffit (COR #29) 1,710.54 frame soffd around beams at grids 6 & 7 between G >3< H. AWC quote 4/23/08 5 ASI 51 RA Duct Opening & Transition (COR#31) 0.00 & 51R 6 ASI 81 Second Floor Office Revisions (RFP-03) 3,814.80 Revise & add office and conference space on 2nd Public Works & Fire Dept areas. AWC quote 4/29/08 7 ASI 82 Reverse Door Frame in Rm 103 (COR#31) 0.00 8 RFI 106 Fire Riser Rm 130 Enlargement (COR#33) 1,832,00 Demo existing wall in Rm 130 ~ rebuild 15' of new wall. AWC quote 4/23108 8 RFI 107 Basement Restroom Fan Relocation (COR#34) 502.56 10,856.10 Page 1 of 1 p 1- ? , a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v t ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~~ r~I ~ ~ r ~ + ~ rry~ +i r ~, r t i ,~ ~ '~ r l~ i a i ~~ a t 7~ ~r D , y fi- + a ~I i ~ ~ f '~' ~ q ~' r; z ~! c~ i~ r 4 fi i~ ~ ~~~ ~ Y f ~r t ~ ~ i3 ~~ ,. ~ t t ` ~ I 3 i~ ~~, ~ ~ ~ ~~i I I~~ ~ ) 77 .. ~f 1 1 3~ 1 ~k ~~ - L ~~. ~~ j Z y 1 r 1 ~ lt~ A y~#)\ rl ~~ 5 rj _ ~ 7, 1 r9 - S 4 1 Y a f ~` f F. i ~~ R ~ ~;. 4 ~, 3 ~ ' ~, t ~ ,( AAAA~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ f { • ~.1~rIERIC.~I`~T WALL.,COVER, IBC DRYWALL & ACOUSTICAL SPECIALTIES 2685 E. LANARK STREET, MERIDIAN, ID 83642 (208) 887-1062 FAX (208) 887-1129 PU9LIC WORKS LIC M 11186-AA-4, 10 REGISTRATION a RCE-3899 OREGON LIC M 118119 Randy~americanwalloaver. c8m 1~801~O~AL BE~,~'E~T /h~~~S Q~Z~ ~~~ ~~ Project Name: Meridian City Hall Proposal Request 01 -~ Location: Meridian, Idaho P. ~ Date: 3/20/2008 /" Attn: Tom Couglin Addendum: We propose to furnish labor and materials for the following listed Flow: These are new Items added due to new layout Steel stud framing, Drywall: hang, tape, ready for paint Wall Type 1 $ 5,392.00 Steel stud framing, Drywall: hang, tape, ready for paint Wall Type 3 $ 6,028.00 Wrap Columns $ 2,218A0 Cut in 2 additional doorways $ 760.00 These are Items removed due to new layout Steel stud framing, Drywall: hang, tape, ready far paint Wail Type 1 $ (3,479.00) Steel stud framing, Drywall: hang, tape, ready for paint Wall Type 3 $ (g,7pg_Qp) Steel stud framing, Drywall: hang, tape, ready for paint Wall Type 6 $ (x,386.00) Wrap Columns $ (3,447 00) Exclusions: Paint, Batt Insulation Total Deduct: $ (624.00) Sincerely, Randy Pierce President/American Walkover, Inc. C:1Documents and SettingslRandy PiercelMy DocumerrtslTEMPLATES1Proposai Template "~ 'I i ~ ~ k I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ i ~ , ~ ~ ~~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j k ~ g 4 ~ a a. ~ ~ ~ i f i ,~~ ~ a i f ` ~ k ~ ~ f ~~ ( ~ .~ 1 ~ , ~ ' }~; ~ .l ~~ ~ ~;~: ; ~ ~ ~ ! 3 ~ ~ Vi ~ i:' ~ f ~ s ~ ~s ~ z ~ ~ ~ ,~ 5 ~~ i ~ ~ , ~ I ~ _ ~ ~ ~ f i ~ ~ i ~ k v rr i r!r. V s I ~ ~ i . t 4! ~ ~ L ~ x ~ £ I ~ ~ ~~ . F ~ ~.~~ 1 G E Y 1 ' i i.. ' ,> } F , , ~ ~ # _ ~ 1 ~ ~ S ~ 1 aJ ~ ~,~~ 1 ~ ~ D. ;~I 11 ~ ~: . y ~ ~ 1 ~ j ~ . . ., ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ i ~ it ~ ~ ~ ' ~~1- , i~3 ~ ~'?~ ~t~ _ ' ,. ~ k~.l. r, ;~ k , ~i~ ~ i ~' ®~~uc,Aly w~cov~, nvc. DRYWALL d~ ACOUSTICAL SPECIALTIES 2665 E. LANARK STREET, MERIDIAN. ID 83642 ~1J~ (208) 887-1062 FAX (208) 887-1129 ~j PUBLIC WORKS UC It 1118b-AA-4, IO REfi15TRATION M RCE 3899 A~ ~pY'~ ~v OREGON LIC it 118119 ~/,~ ~ ~ •~ ~ ~~ Proposal Request 01 Project Name: Merktian City Hall Location: Mercian, ID Date: 2008-04 23 Attn: Tom Coughl'in/Petra RE: Pro~sal Request 01 No charge for changing door types 307 8348 $ - $ - Sub tob31 $ - 8ond $ - Total $ - Sincerely, Mike Crawford Project ManagerlAmerican Walkover ;~ ~; s t ~ 1 1~ a~ p' ~ i '~ 4 ~i ~ a a ~ ~ i si ~ ` ` ~ ~ ~ t k . ~ ~ i f ~ _ ~ ~ ~ L ~. t ~ s i` g t, Y' t t ' ~ F r 1~ Y 1 1 Y~ 4 f . r ~i t k ~ 4~ f , . { ~ M i' } t • ° ! 4 ~; i' ~ j v ; ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a. :A ~ ~ h - i ~ ~ .k P }~ ~ F ~ i~ ~ ~ F ' t ~` ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ [ ~ ~ as ~ ~~. { 1~ ; ~ ' ~ ~ @ 'K k~ } gi j ~ { # ~ ~ ; , , ~ ~ ~ r ' Z ~ j ~ j. F 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ YY i ~ ~ _ F ' t ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rS I ` ~ f ' ~ i I ~ 1 k t ~, , 4 i ., ~ g t ~ i 6 '~' ~ ~ 1 ~ 1' 4. p ~ ^ I { 3 f ~ ~ ~ t ~t' ~ ~ 1 ~ E ~ ~ _ // [ ~ i 5 ~ ~ ~ ~~1 ~~; ~ yi~ ~ ~ } F ~ S ,~' { ~ J~ - ' F ~ ~ ~t ~ t i ~~ ~ i . ~~ ~i ~ ~ r +~ ~ ~k ` s ~l. ~ i ~? i. '+ ,fi ~.~~ E ~T ~a~~ Y~ '~ ~ ~':. ~ t ' ~3:~ #1: j l ~~ v 6 F. DRYWALL & ACOUSTICAL SPECIALTIES 2685 E. LANARK STREET, MERIDIAN, ID 83642 1208) 887-1062 FAX 1208) 887-1129 PUBUC WORKS UC ~ 11186-AA 4, ID RE©ISTRATION A RCE-3849 OREGON LIC #I 118119 Rar~yQameriomiwail~over.oan ~~.,..-- 3 Chan a Order 20 ~ a ~ ~ z Project Name: Meridian City Hall Location: Meridian, ID Date: 2008-0423 Attn: Tom Coughfin/Petra RE: Change Order 20 No charge to change roof screen wap on W. side from 6" s#ud to 8" stud $ _ S - Sub total $ _ Bond $ _ Total ~$ _ Sincerely, Mike Crawford Project Manager/American Wa~oover ~ 1~ - ~ - i ~ s ~ ~ ~ ?~,_ Y ~ }t f~ ~~ ; ~ ~~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~_ 1~ t-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~1 ' ~' 4 ~ :r ~ s ~, s ~ n ' ~ ~' 3. ~ ' } i ~ F ] S ~ ; t ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ c ~ . ~ a f ~, ~ 1 - t , ; s •• ? FF , t , {yyry~ ii _., )~_ I ~. ~ ~.., ,Y 1 _ F_ ~ 4' ~ ~1 } ' f V {~ i ~, '• ~ i Q ~- x f ~ ` z } ~ ~: ~ j f ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , _ .. #k. .. ~ ~ .. ~ I ~ ... t i { tjs' F a4 i ~ ~ ; ~~ i ~, }}} raq E } ~~ ,~ f r a~ ~k 1 1 f ~ t f~ i t' 7 t ~ ~{ ~. ~ r r. ~~ ~~ { S ~ [; t ~7 5 ! 4 ~ I i ' ~ I ~. [ f L ~ ~ H ~.. ~ f 1 4 ';, ~ t' ~7 b r t' 1 ~ , 3. t ~ 3 ~ ' ~ ! i t;4 ,11II f , i ,; ~ , ~i ~ I f 1 ~ ~ t ~} i ~ t~ ~' 1 1 ! ;: i ~. ~ ~ ~ i :_ 4 ~ i~~ ` ® ~j ~Y~i1~CL~1.V W~LLCD Y P~A~ 11VC. DRYWALL & ACOUSTICAL SPECIALTIES 2685 E. LANARK STREET, MERIDIAN, ID 83642 (208) 887-1062 FAX (208) 887-1129 PUBLIC WORKS UC N 11186-AA-4, ID REGISTRATION II RCE-3899 OREGON LIC 9 118119 Randyi:Ranertaun~rallcovcr-can ASI 72 Praject Name: Meridian City Hall Location: Meridian, ID Date: 2008-04-23 Attn: Tom CoughiiNPetra RE: ASI 72 ~~~ Revise iodation of wall at office #309 and #314 " l1~ A~ Demo Existing Wall ., 1.~~-S Sub b~tal ~ Bond $ Total $ Sincerely, Mike Crawford Project MarggeNAmerign Waltoover r ~i F f a r r ~ ~ ~, a ~ i ~ ! i i i i' ~ , _f. , , j '' ~' ? G , S, i [ ; t ~ ~ ~ 4 { ! r ~ ~ k ) ~5 ' ~ i o t ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I _ . ' ~ r ~ } { ~ ~ Y I ' ~` ~ 5 s . 7 v 1° ~ ~ r F I r `i 1 a ~ ~'~' ~ ~ ~; , a rj tk 1} t' t ~ + i ~ r, ~ ~ ' Yi t ~. '. r i ;: ' ~ ; i. ~~t ~ / ~_~! +' ~ ~ ~ !, `)L ~C 1{t{ I ~ ~~~~. f ) ~~ :~ L~:;~.~I J ~ -. 3 _ a i ~ t j, /'~ ~,h~ ~~LJ ~ •. ~ ` ~ r, $ j ~~ ~ ' c ~ ~ ,t s ~ ~ ~ r s ~ s " t ~- F s i I ~ ~ ~ r ~ ' ~1 i ~ ~ ~' ~ ri ~ ] c y r1 # , a f ~ Z { j r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 3 r , ~ f i ~ r ~ f i 1 ~ {.. 1 a A ~i' ti } ~ ~ ,. l~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~~. ~ 3~ 3~ s 6 ~; ~ ~ I ~ a 3,445.00 300.00 3,745.00 74.90 3,819.90 i. AMERICAN WALLCOVER, INC. ~~ - ~~~ DRYWALL ~ ACOUSncAL sPECIALnES ~ ~ ~~ $~ 2~ 2685 E. LANARK STREET,. MERIDIAN, ID 83642 f208} 887-1062 FAX (Z08) 887-1129 ' PUBLK: MfORKS l)C S 11186-AA-4. ID REGISTRAnQN A RCE-3899 OREGON LiC 11 118119 amerieaMrallcovtr.~an Change Order 29 ~ ~ - !~ Project Name: Meridian City Hall Location: Meridian, ID Date: 2~8-04-23 Attn: Tom CoughGrdPetra RE: Change Order 29 Frame sori'itt around beams at grid 6 8 7 beiw~n G and H Sincerely, Mike Cn~rnrfard Project Manager/Americ:art Waltoover ~ ° ~ . ~; ~' ~` t , j ~ `, d i s ` i a ~' ~ ~1 3 a +. ~ ' 1 t ~hs ~ T !t: ~ i ~ y(! 1 t` ~~ ~ , i~- l~ `~~~ ' ` ~ `ye ~' ' d ~`` ~ 4x ~'. ~ r. . Y ( F ~ 7 ~ ~+ ~~ ~ * 1 ~ i ~ '~ ~ ~ 4 ,~ i. ? Sub tonal $ Bond $ Total $ ~, ~. ' ~ .t ~ ~ , ~ ~ [ ~ 3 ~~S t, ~ ~ ~.. ~ p r t ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ t ,} ~~ ~til ~ ~ i f~ ~ ~ :.~~ II ~~ ~ ~ ) ~ }'. i ' ' ~ ;. ,' 7 ~. _ . , 5 . r i F, . ~ ~ 1 j _ ; i j + i r jj `~ { ~ I 1 ! ~ _ ~ j' 1YIY Y ~ ~ t S ~ 1. ~~ ~ I 7 ~ f I `, ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ t ~ . ~ }} 1 1 i ~ ~~ ~ '~ < J 1' ~ F ~ ~ t ~ ~' - i yy ~ d ' ~~g i i j~ ~ ; i.- y ti 7~ 7} 3 ~ ~~ ! ,,ccCC a ; ~t s ~ ~~ a. ~ 1,sn.0o 1,677.00 33.54 1,710.54 ~~~c~v w~.cov~, nvc. DRYWALL & ACOUSTICAL SPECIALTIES ~ l'r a~:1 ~ `~~ 2685 E. LANARK STREET, MERIDIAN, ID 83642 (208) 887-1062 FAX (208) 88T-1129 ~~. ~ ~ b PUBLIC WORKS UC ti 11186-AA-4, 10 RE(i1STRATiON 1~ RCE-3899 OREGON LIC # 118119 er.oan AS150 ~ l Project Name: Meridian City Hall Location: MericGan, ID Date: 2008-04-23 Attrr. Tom CoughlirVPetra RE: ASI50 No charge for duct offset @ plan vault $ $ - Sub total $ - Bond $ - Total $ - Sincerely, Mike Crawford Project Manager/Mneric~n WaUc~ver ;F ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,, ~ I~ ~ ~r( .~ , ~~_~ t n ~ t a ~ ~ ~ ~, 1 { 1Y ~ ;' f ~ ~ ~! a 2 ; ~ r ~' P i ! ~ ~ , ~ Y ~' , ~ ~ 3 i i~ ~ ~ u~, dd ~: i t ..~ g ; s~ ~ s ~ d j ~f i ~' k ~ ( 3 ~~ ~ i -~ ; t - i S S I ~. 4` § ~ 3 ~ ,y4. ~ F ; ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ r c _ i ~}~ ~ ~ ~' !~ } Y~ ~ i ,^ R ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t is E ~ ~ ~ ' i ~ ~ '~ ~' t ~;fi ~ ~~ F ~i i f ~ ~ t ._ ~ } ~ ~ 4 ~ ' ~ ~i t ~~ ~ ~ ~r= i + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7. I ~ ti r s _ ~. - F . 1 ?' _ ` ~ .~ , ; ~ 3 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fig ~ ~~ ~ ' ~~~ ~ r ~~ ~ 3 ~:1 -;~; ~ ": ~' T ~, i a ~ e~ ~ y 3. ~ r 3 i ~ ~~ ~f ) '~E ~~ C -~„ s ., ~t 9p9~~. ii~ I a L 7 f ,. ~ i. 1~ .., ti L- _ ®,C>11Y,~i1~l~A1V WALLI~~ Y rl\~ 11V1.i. ~tYWALL d~ ACOUSTICAL SPECIALTIES 2685 E. LANARK STREET, MERIDIAN, ID 83642 1208) 887-1062 FAX 1208) 887-1129 PUBLIC WORKS UC 4 11186-AA-4, ID REOISTRATiON A RCE-3899 OREGON LK:11 118119 Rand~f ~kmavollt~.eom ASI 81 Project Name: Meridian City HaU Location: Meridian, ID Date: 2008-04-29 Attn: Tom CoughliNPetra RE: ASI 81 ~'~~ " ~ l ~~~ - 03 Add Office 283 adjacent to Office 218 $ 1,350.00 Revise Unassigned Space #211 to Conferent~ Roam Columns $ 2,040.00 Remove Sheetrodc for Air Plentum Between Lobby 207 and Office 216 •$ 70.00 Remove Sheetrodc for Air Plentum Between Lobby 207 ark Work Area 212 $ 70.00 Remove Sheetrock for Air Plentom Between Work Area 212 and Hall 209 $ 70.00 Remove Sheetrock fpr Air Plentum Between Hall 209 and Office 211 $ 70.00 Remove Shc for Air Plentum Between Office 220 and Office 216 $ 70.00 Subtotal $ 3,740.00 Bond $ 74.80 Total $ 3,814.80 Sincerely, Randy Pierce RlrreidentiAmerican WaUoover S ~ Y ~~ ~ ~ ~ I a ro ~~ i- .t, ~ ~ r, ~ Y-~ k s ~~ f ~ ~~ 7 ~I ~ 3 ]i ~~~r ~ ~ ~ i f ~ rat ~ f ~f i6 t ~~~ ~ ~ ~. .t e ~= ~ ti - ~; F ~ y ;~,~ ~ ~7~ ~ "~',; e ~'. k, •~ s ~ i f, . t ~ ~~ _~ ~ ~ ~ is ~j tl i.~ u , i ~t ! 1 Y ~ ~'f~p. ~ '19t ~ ~: i ~i y F ~ ~ k: ?'. ~ ~ t ~- ~,~ ~ '~'~ tv ~°~ia f ~' t i '~ $ i, a l, t " ~ c 1 1 1 i i j~ fi~ ~~~ t ~ 4 ~~.. f jt f, - k ~ F.. a f14 { - {$ ~{ a ~., Jt ri r ,AMERICAN WALLCOVER, INC. oR~rwAU. a AcousncAL sPECrALTIES 2685 E LANARK STREET, I~AERIDIAN, ID 83642 (208) 887-1062 FAX (208) 8B7-1129 PUBLIC WORKS LIC ~ 11186-AA-4, 10 REGISTRATION ~ RCE-3899 OREGON LIC A 118119 Randy~mnerkanwalloove~.~n ASI 82 Project Name: Meridian City Hall Location: Meridian. ID Date: Z~&04-23 Attn: Tom CoughliNNPetra IZE: ASI 82 No charge for reversing door in room 103 Subtotal Bond Total Sincerely, Mike CrawFoni Project ManageNArnerican Walkover i ~ { 4~; ~ ; ~ _ ~ _ sir . _ V} ~ ~ ~ ' r ~ g 2. 1 1~~ f ~ , I y~ 3r s N lj ~ Y. {'.~ 4 p ~ ~' ~ ,' ` ~ ~~ ~ ~ S ~ 1 .~ '. F e ~~ ~_t~. i ~ ~ 1 ~ ~,, pp .~' F ~ , ~ t 1 3 ~ ~ t } ~i ~ ~ E , t ~ v ~~ ~ ~ a _ ~ e, c s ~ # ~ ~ a ~µ ;, t y> ~ (~ i ~ ~ i is ~. , , i ;w ' 7{jF~ 1; ~ ~ ~; ~ ; i +f ~ jE ~ '~ ~~ , ? ~ ~ ~~ ~} ~~ _~ S i ~~ ' ' i i ~ ~ t ~ ~ ` ~'~ , ~ ~ ~ l a i ~ € ~,~ F ~ ~~ D ~-. r [ a~el~ .iy ~}` ~ ~ $~' cam ~ 3l $ - $ - $ -~ $ - ~ i ~, ` ~ :~ { 1 j " ~ t ~ ` d ¢ y 1 ~~~ ' ! t ~ 1~ Y ~ [ i - r o ~ ® ®AMERICAN WALLCOVER,. INC. F~ ~~ b ~ DRYWALL & ACOUSTICAL SPECIALTIES ~ ~ ~ ~' 33 2685 E. LANARK STREET, MERIDIAN, ID 83642 (208) 887-1062 FAX (208) 887-1129 ' PUBLK: WORKS UC tF 11186-AA-4, 10 REGISTRATION 4 RCE-3899 OREGON LiC Ii 118119 .cam Rfl 106 Project Flame: Meridian City Hall Location: Meridian, ID Date: 2008-0423 Attn: Tom CoughGn/Petra RE: RFI 1 ~ Demo existing wall in rim 130 $ ~p.flp Frame 15' of new wall $ 1,040 ~ Sub total $ 1,600.00 Bond $ 32.00 Total $ 1,632.00 Sincerely, Mike Crawford Project ManageNAmerican Walkover t' u ~ ~ ~ ~ t I~ ~ ~ 1c { i e~ ~ ~ i - i ~ ~ i ~ 'e ~ k ~ ~d[ 't l ~' ~~ E o ~ F r, Y; ~ ~ ~.~ ,~ 1; ,~~~ r a; ~: z-3+ y~ ~ ., :, ' i~ r ~ 1 ~' ~ . ~~ ~~ ~ ,R `~ • s ~AMERIC~AN WALLCOVER, INC. DRYWALL do ACOUSTICAL SPECIALTIES . 2685 E. LANARK STREET. MERIDIAN, ID 83642 1208} 887-1062 FAX 1208) 887-1129 PUBLIC WORKS LIC 411186-AA-4, ID REGISTRATION 4 RCE-3899 OREGON LIC 4 118119 .oan ' Chan a Order 34 Project Name: Meridian City Hall ~~~j).'p`f5~ t.ocation: Meridian, ID Date: 2008-04-23 Attn: Tom Coughlin/Petra RE: Change Order 34 Remove fat grid for gy~um hardlid Add 2~Q Acoustical Ceiling Tile: ARM 2nd look Subtotal $ Bond $ Total $ Sincerely, Mike Crawford Project AAanager/American Wapcaver ~-`1~~~111~ 1~ n~-~ ~~a~ G~ ~ ~3 R 140.00 353.00 493.00 9.86 502.66 s; 1: ~ ~' ~ >3 4 '~- ~ ~' ~~ ~ ~d ~ ~. I~ i s 1 ~ i~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ' a ~ }~ C ~ ~~ ~. ~ ~- ~t ,~~} s t _ - % . ~ E 7 gr ~.1~ gg (~ ~ ~ P } ,~~ ,~ .~~( ;~ 4 a~; ~ j s i. a ~ ~_ " it r ~i ~ fi~~ ~i ' 1 ~~ ` , € ~_ ~ x ~~,~ ~i' `; ~ ~ 3i ~ ~ E ~(~(y i' p J ~: 9 ~~ ~ ~' ~ '. ~; e i ,Y i 1 _F _ ~ A p ~i~ _ ~ ~= ~' ~ ~ YYY i ~ ~ 9~ 1~ ~ w E~; ~ SS i ~~SS f ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 77' June 13, 2008 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Finance Department ITEM NO. 6-8-2 REQUEST TfE-Precom Change Order No. 2 for City Requested Change in Scope for the Not to Exceed Amount of $3,470.96 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See attached CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRIGT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. ~ I ~ ~ ' i ti L ~ I ~, ~ 3 ~ 7 I 1 ~ ~i ~ t~ [ 4j , ~ tr ~ 1 . tC ? ~ . ~'~ ~ a I .~ F ~ 4 D tl~ b I ' ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~' ~: ~ , ~ ;i t{pE I ~~~ ~ t "y ~- F~ ~ . i ~: a ~ h 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~, f, . :' ~ I r .g ~ i e 1 ~ r { ~ ~ ~ l ( E) F P 1 , I ~ ~ i - ~ ~ i ~ 4 ~f I r ~ ! ~ ~ I q f d bi A sf ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ j ~fi: ~ ~ f ~ ~ p ~ ~ LS ~ ~ ~. t. } ~~ ( ~ fff ~ f , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Si ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G CiP1Y OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, ID 83642 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER CHANt3E ORDER NO. 02 PROJECT No. CH-06-001 DATE: 0$/4/08 EFFECTIVE DATE: CONTRACTOR: TTE-PRECOM PROJECT: MERIpIAN CITY HALL -Phase 3 Tenant Improvements The Conhador is hereby direded to make the following ehartgea from the Conbad Documents and Plans. Description: Incorporate revisions per A8181-Second Floor 081ce Revbiorre per attached PCOti2, dated tir21/2088 ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REtWAIN THE SAME Reason for Change Order. Additional scope or revlslorre per listed ASI N81 ' Altadrmenffi: Change order Items description, dated 6/21/88, with corrtractor quotes CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES: Original Contract Price $219,000.00 Original Contact Times: Sutretantlal Complet~n 8i28l08 Net changes form prevbus Change Orders Net dtenges form previous Charge Orders No. - to 01 No._ to _ (calendar days) ($29,687.37) None Goofed Price Prior to this Change Order: Contrad Tunes pdar to the Change Qrder. . (cad~dat days ordate) $189,312.63 erz62ao6 Net lnaease (decrease) of this Change Oder. Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order. (mar day9 or date) $3,470.96 None Goofed Price with ell Approved Change Orders: Contrad Timms with all Approved Change OMers: (calendar days) $192,783,59 Suf~tatttlal Completion 8/28/2008 RECOMMENDED: (CONSTRUCTION R) ACCEPTED: (CONTRACTOR) _,,,~~--' Petra Inc. - T~_p~ t3y: Thomas R Coughs By: Nk: Astk+ford Date: ~, y O g Date: G Q APPROVED: ( TY RC a qOE~ COUNCIL APPR VAL 1 (J~t// ey: xenn Watts Date: CQ- 13 - 0 ~. ~ - C `, ' O ,",,,,,,r",,,~ ,,,, ,,,, APPROVED: C ~ ~n "` ATTEST: ~~~ I ~. '~ ~ By: Mayor Tammy ds We ~ d t3yr. CNy Clerk, Holman Q ~ Date: ~.. ~..1.. ~0 Date: ~" _ i1,Q~ _ ~ ,~ 'q~~'T sn . ~,~ ~i~b~ (~AYT~ ~'~ ~~~~ < s ~ ~ t s• 1 4 ~ ~ i ~ ~ z i ~ T t ~. E =3 ~ `~ ~ I@ t ' ~ ~ ,, 'r ~ ~,, ~ ~ (~ ~ 's # I ~ 4 a t f. ~ i 4 ~ ;i z ~ I i r 4 ~ F- l ! ~ t IS '~ ' ~i EI~: ~ ~ ~ ~ 1' ~ ( i` ~ P ~ ~ ` r/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R v ~ ~ I In, ~ ' ~ TT ~ r 1 ~ ~ i;, 6 ~ ~ i ~ f I ~~ ~ ~;' ~. I i t i I ~ ;~ ~ ~ {{ 3~' dy '~ ~ ' v ~~ i ~ t ~ . } t , ~ ~ ~' ~ ' ~ t~ a ' ~ ~~ ; 6 ~ Le_ fi 3 ~ ~ f Y ~~ F~ ~ ,. i t t S ~~ ~ ~ ~ 95 t ~ ~ ~ i. I F ~ I' ~ )) '~ " ~ ~ r~ ' I ~ I ' 1: f ~ Y t s ~ f f ~ 5 1' 1 S 1 ~ 1 A~ (, I ~. ~ S ! t E i~ f ~ f ~ ~ iii ~,-, ~ t ~ I ~ ~ ' ~ y ~ ' y E ~ _ t ! ( ' ' ~ I' C Memo ~~-~~a • U ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ tits ~~~~~~~-~ ~~~~~ ~~ To: Jaycee Holman, City Clerk IFrom: Keith Watts, Purchasing Agent CC: Tara Green, Stacy IGlchenmann, Council, Tom Coughlin Qat~ 6/13/08 Re: June 17 City Council Deparment Report The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the June 17 City Counal Agenda under Department Report. TTE-Precom Chance Order #2 Additional work tier Architect's Sutitilemerrtal Instructions °ASl° fi81. All work under this Change Order #2 will be completed pursuant to the existing Telecommunications contract dated May 8, 2007. Total contract amount is now $192,783.59. Budget for this contract is $225,000.00 which we are still under by $32,216.41 Recommended Council Action: Approve Change Order #2 to TTE-Precom for additional telecommunication work per the attached, for a Not To-Exceed amount of $3,470.96 authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest. Thank you for your consideration. • Page 1 } r: r ~j 4~. ~,t; '~ r"~: a z. i g a' 5 #": e~ L ~ ~` #- ~i ~,,r ~, t , i' ~~" , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ;, ,~ < < .~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ S ~ sf . ~ ' Y i . 1 t k ~ ~ f ~; q ' # ~ a ~ 1 ! $ ~ ~ , 4 r ' i s 3 s ~, SS3 4 l i , 3 y ~ .. ' ' § Q ~ k ~ ~ ~ . ~ 7 3 ~. ~ ` K ~ ~ . ' j ' ~ ~ ~ ' 5 . i t ~ , 1 ~ -S : F d 2 '~ ~ q ~ ~, ~ ' ~ ~~ 3 ,~ ~~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~~ ` ~ ! '' ~a . t <~j+ .~ ~~ %(i ~1 A l 1' r ~~ i ~~}~~ 1'~ 1 ~' a i~r 3. ,~i~i t` ~ f , ~ 1 ~ < ~ t ~ ~ ~ ai ~ I ~~ ; ~ t i `: i- 7 { ~} ~. S ~ r S~ 4 ~J CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • CHANGE ORDER NO. 02 PROJECT NO. CH-06-007 DATE: 06!4/08 EFFECTNE DATE: CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER t .' 5 ', 1.' CONTRACTOR: TTE-PRECOM PROJECT: MERIDIAN CITY HALL -Phase 3 Tenant Improvements The Contractor Is hereby directed to make the following changes from the Contract Documertfs and Plans. Description: Incorporete revisions per ASI 81-Second Floor Office Revisions per attached PCO#2, dated 6/21/2008 ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SAME. Reason for Change Order. Additional scope or revisions per listed ASI #81 Attachments: Change order items description, dated 5/21/08, with contractor quotes CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES: Original Contract Price $219,000.00 Original Contract Times: Substantial Completion 8/28/08 Net changes form previous Change Orders Net changes form previous Change Orders No. - to 01 No._ to _ (calendar days) ($29,687.37) None Contract Price Prior to this Change Order. Contract Times prior to this Change Order. (calendar days or date) $189,312.63 si26noa6 Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order. Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order. (ca~endardays w date) $3,470.96 None Contract Price with all Approved Change Orders: Contract Times with all Approved Change Orders: (plendar days) $182,783.58 Substantial Completion 8/28/2008 RECOMMENDED: (CONSTRUCTION ER) ACCEPTED: (CONTRACTOR) ° Petra Inc. TTE-Preto By: Thomas R. Coughli By: Nlc Astleford Date: ~ 'y G ~2 Date: 6 O APPROVED: ( RC G Gq EyT) COUNCIL APPR VAL ~ {j/t// By: Keith Watts Date: ~~ , ~ (J Date: APPROVED: (Cn'1~ - ATTEST: By: Mayor Tammy de Weerd By: City Clerk, Jaycase Holman Date: Date: r 3 ~ F a~ i s',~ , ) ~~- ~ ~ ~ "! i l a ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ,~ i ~ ~ "rt ~ ~ i ; i f _ ,.1 ~ ~ i •.i 1 T~ ji. r ; t ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ e' i v ~ ~ ~' S; , ~ ` i 1 t z4r ~F }S}S ~ ~~. k ~t i : ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~i. '.(I pp!!! k y Y Y ~~ ~i ff ~ 1 ~ ! ~ ~' PROPOSED CHANGE ORDER ~ No. 00002 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDUW, ID 83642 • PHONE: {208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 TITLE: ASI#812nd Flr Off. Revisions Ph I~ DATE: 5/21/2008 PR07ECT: Meridian City Hall SOB: 050675 TO: Attn: Nic Astleford CONTRACT NO: 36 TTE-PreCom 710 S Orchard St. Boise , ID 83705 Phone: 344-3660 Fax: 3440095 RE: To: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL **All taxes are included in costs** Item Description 00001 ASI#815eoond Floor Office Revisions (RFP#02)- Revise & add office and conference space on 2nd Public Works & Fire Dept areas. Install 8 additional Cat6A kxations, total of 16 cables to indude jades and faceplates. PRECOM quote 4/30/08 From: Number: Quantity Units Unit Price Tax Ram Tax Amount Net Amount 1.000 LS $3,470.96 0.00% $0.00 $3,470.96 Unit t.~t: $3,470.96 Unit Tax: $0.00 Lump Sum: $0.00 Lump Tax: $0.00 0% GC Markup: $0.00 Totai: $3,470.96 APPROVAL: By: Date: Expedition i ;f 1 if j n t ~ t: 5 Z '" ~ ~. 7~ z S `f s ~f . By: ~---- ~-- By: -Pret;om Lom rd Conrad Architects Date: (p ~ ~ Date: (r ~ O i e 1 ~- ~: jj i r: i.~, I~ i i 1 F ~ r , ~ i ~ ~ ; j' 1~ ~' ::3. e r f ~F r ~ ~ ( } j . ` r ~ 1 I ~ F S ~' ~ I T ~ ~ t. 1 g ' ~ ~i ; MERIDIAN CITY HALL PROJECT NO: GH-06-001 PreCom -Phase 3 (36) 05/21/08 CHANGE ORDER NO 2 CHANGE ORDER ITEMS 1 ASI 81 Second Floor Office Revisions (RFP-02j 3,470.96 Revise ~ add office and conference space on 2nd Public Works 8 Fire Dept areas. Install 8 additional Cat6A locetions, total of 16 cables to include jacks and faceplates. PRECOM Quote 4/30/08 3,470.96 ~ ' ~~ ~ ~ I ~ -. ~ ~= ~ it ~ ~ ,~ r i~i ~ ~~ ~ ~ i 2 • 3,~~6 ~;,F~ ~z 555 ~ ~. ~' ~ i ~ e } ~ s ' a ~~ ~. ' ! . t ; ~ is ~ _ 4) f7 y L f~~ r i~ ~a - ~ . r r ~. t i ~: > , t t t ~ - ~ ~ R` y .i , ~' , ~ y ~ - G T J { ~ jj ~ ' 3 ,' / S ~ . Y ~ 1 ]i t q (y I t tf , Page 1 of 1 '1 . ~. ;i iY '.I ~j, f C q F ~ . ~~ _ ,. ~t F i 4, t } ~. ~ ~ k itn ~ 7. 1 L }' 1 ~~ t t i I 1 ~' ; 3L ~'t ` ~ r ~ {1 t t - ! ,1 ~- ', , i ~~ ~ ~ Fl i I 4' ~ 3 ~ E ; ,_ ~ ~ f s ; : ;' (;j C z ~. ~, ~ i ;~: ~ ~~ pRetl8(ON COMbIUNICAT~ON~' • ~' ~~/ . ~~ CHANGE ORDERs~ PROJECT NAME: Meridian City Hall DATE: 430-08 ` PRECOM QUOTE NO: 1983 ASI NO: 81 CONTACT: Tom Coughlin CUSTOMER: Petra Incorporated ADDRESS: 1097 N. Rosario Street Meridian, ID 83704 PHONE: 208-323-+4500 The following changes are hereby authorized by the above referenced diem and are subject to all terms and conditions of the original scope of work agreement. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES: Install (8) addi~onal Cat6A (10GIG) locations far a total of (16) cables. Install corresponding jacks and faceplates. TOTAL OF CHANGE ORDER: $3,470.96 ~-' LABOR: $1,320.00 MATERIALS: $2,150.96 SUBCONTRACTOR OR VENDOR AGREES TO MAKE THE HEREIN DESCRIBED CHANGES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE ORIGINAL SCOPE OF WORK AGREEMENT. CLIENT APPROVAL: NAME (print) SIGNATURE Nicholas Astieford ACCEPTED BY DATE -¢-3D-08 DATE Precfslon Commun[cations, Inc. RCE-1280 dba: Pt~eCom Phone (208) 344-36SQ 710 South Orcharcl St Fax (208) 344-0095 t3oise, Idaho 83705 tnfo(~precom-h~c.com r ~ r;~ yl i : 1 ' S # } :. ~ } S t .5 ~ ee ~ ~j E f 4 ~.'.' i t l ~ ~. ~ (~ a }'~ t - s : ''z' es'. A $ ~ F ~ _ p . . y i~' :~, i:~ C. !,' I'i .i 7 '~.. . .. '. ir. .:~ #..~ .i t d' ~(.. #' .,F' S' , a;'~; i s. ~: ~ .~a t. ~ ~a. gzdt~ 'j is , ` Y. i ..,:,s g :: ~; ' ra.~ ;; ~:. ~~i ~ ~' ~ ~1 . 7 t k r III ~, SS ~ t: . . i x{ ( .'~ Y ~!' }' : C.$' .~. ) j . y' ttrr )`- J Jii i? ~ j £'. . ~ l ~' }} ~.: ~F ~ ;" , 4 T# :. ). i d i ' '~ . t i : . . !':: U .t' ~ 4c ' ' #.. : = '~ %F.• ~'( ..'~' S. , `'s ~ L '3'j `'7 ~.~. ~ . : .~ 3 4. '7 i: . ~~~ e , :~ `! S : 7 ~: ~~ i ~~'~` # ~ _ ` ~,.. ~.: ~~ ~ W Y 5 }} i. :` < f .L . . f E ) F : ..' Y. }~ ? 3 Yge . • t•' ;r } I ~~ ~! ~; j; t yt t 4` r ~f e o x~.,~v~~ Tom Coughlin From; Nic Asdeford [nic~pnacom-inc.com] • Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 20081:57 PM To: Tom Coughlin Subject: ASI81 Attachmer~ffi: CO#4 8 additlonal 10gig locatlons 4-30-08.doc HERE IS THE CHANGE ORDER FOR ASI 81. I DID IT INSTALLING THE 10GIG CABLING THAT IS IN ALL THE BUILDING. ONCE I LOOK AT THE EXACT LOCATIONS AND WHERE THE CAT5E CABLES ARE IT DOESN'T REALLY WORK OUT TO USE THEM FOR THESE LOCATIONS. HOPE THIS IS OK. Nicholas Astleford O~pera~tions Manager ~ 8 /5~ A lt• jO COMK 710 S. Orchard St. Boise, Idaho 83705-1228 208.562.4364 Direct 208.344.0095 Fax nasNeford(8,precom-inc.com www.precom-inc.com 5/2!2008 • • June 13, 2008 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Finance Department ITEM NO. 8-8-3 REQUEST Designer Floors Change Order No. 1 for City Requestd Change in Scope for the Not to Exceed Amount of $5,597.00 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See attached CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the Ctly of Meridian. i I tt I 1 ~ f f 3 ~ .~' } ~ i { ~ ~: { ~V I l ~ i. { ~i' I ~ ~'. ~. ~ }; F. '1 f' ~ F, ~ ~ f _ ~. ~. % ~ i a ; P ~ 1 ~ ~ S , is t` k1 t t ~ I I ~ ~ y ~ ~, i , ~.. CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, ID 83642 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER CHANGE ORDER NO. Q1 PROJECT NO. CH-0S-001 DATE: 065-08 EFFECTIVE DATE: CONTRACTOR: DESIGNER FLOORS PROJECT: MERIDIAN CITY HALL -Phase 3 Tenant Improvements The Contnictor is heretyt directed to make the following changes Iran the Contract Documents and Plans. Description: Incorporate revisions per ASPe41, 66, 81, 80R, 83 d. PRli01 per attached PCO/01,dated 8Mt1108 ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SAME Reason far Change Order. Additional scope or revisleta per Ik#ad ASI's & PR Attachments: Change order Items description, dated 6H81~, with eorRrador quotes CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES: Original COntraCt PT1C8 $182,354.00 Original Contrail Thnas: Subsmntial Comptetian 828!08 Net changes form previous Change Orders Nat d~angea form previous Change Ordere No. 00 to 00 No.,_ to _ (calendar days) $ ..0_ None Contrail Price Prtar to thq Change Order. Contrail Tm~es prior to this Change Order: (~a~) $982,354.00 e232oo3 Net increase (decrease) of this Change Order: Net Increase (decrease) of the Change Order. (r~lendar days m date) $5,597.00 None Centred Price with sA Approved Change Orders: Corrtrad Times whh alt Approved Change Orders: (cela~ar days) 5187,951.00 Substantial Completion 8/28/2008 RECOMMENDED: (CONSTRUCTION IA~GE~ ACCEPTED: (CONTRACTOR) Petra inc. Designer Floors 4 By: Thames R. C hlin ~ By: Dick Broom ~~~~~ Date: G G ~~ Date: w 'Y Jl hkA~G A APPROVED: (CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL ~~ i~ C'//V/(j By: Keith Watts /~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ,~. ~ >> uuiNliyr~ ~ , Date: ~ . 1 I) r~ r ~,/ Date: `~ ~/~~ APPROVED: (C P ~ l ~ ~ A~~ j `.`` ~ ~~ O'~ -P9 s ls f By: Mayor Tammy de Wee By: Cay Clerk, Jaycee Hokaan Dais: _ ~ Date: _ _ SEAL ~ ~~ .~ ~ T tsl~ . P ~. ., ~. ' i J } it S 1 ! ~ ~ ~ r d ~ ~ ' ~ $ j ~., j ~ ~ ~ , d~ 31 .~ ~ CZ . A ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~~ £ ?~ " ~ ~ f ~ I ~ ~ ~1 ~ 4 ~i ~ ~ I , 2' 4 {1 _ .{ ~,f ~ = fit ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ 3~s ~ ~ ! ~ l~5„ f ~~ ~ ~ ~ F ' ~ ~ b t ~ ~ ~. t I ~ ~' : ~ ~ ~ '~ s ~ i i 1 ,' ~ ~ k4 ~1 ~ . ~ ~ t~ ~ . , i ~ ;~ , .a ~ ; ' ~ l i ~ Y_~ ~ ~ ~ I. 1 ~i W F .~ s F r ~ ~~ ~ i ~' ~ { ~' ~ a ~ { ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ i u Memo u To: Jaycee Holman, City Clerk From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Agent ~U~ ~ ~ 200 CC: Tara Green, Stacy Kilchenmann, Council, Tom Coughlin 6/it~ ~t l~~rioia.~. Dat®: 6!93/08 ~i~~ Clerk Of~.cc Re: June 17 City Council Deparment Report The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the June 17 City Council Agenda under Department Report. Designer Floors Change Order #1 Additional work Qer Architect's SuQalemental Instructions °ASI's" #41.65.81. 90R & 93. All work under this Change Order #1 will be completed pursuant to the e~asting Floor CAVering contract dated July 17, 2007. Total contract amount is now $187,951.00. Budget for this contract is $241,930.00 which we are still under by $53,979.00. Recommended Council Actlon: Approve Chang® Ord®r #2 to TTE-Precom for additional floor covering work per th® attached, for a Not To-Exceed amount of $5,597.00 authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest Thank you for your consideration. • Page ~ d! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r, I~ , ~: , 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 4 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' i ~ i ~ {, 1 5 ' i i t ~ ~ ~ `, r ~ Y . 2 ~ ~ y L I 7 }} , ~ ~~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~YY • ~~ ~ t Z ~t ~ ~ 5~~ ij M 1 ~ 3 q y ~ ~. ~' - ~` k. ~ ~ ` .l. ~ 7 ~~ ~ C ~~ ~ ~` !~ r t 7 ~ ilif , ~ i } i ~ ' $ ~ 1. } , ~ f 2 , , ; s , ~ ~x. iiE ' ~~ r ~* { ` , F' ~ i ~~ ; r 1 F Ii i } ~' .I ~.A~ ~' ,tl ~. ~ y. ~ _i' ~~ ~ l~ ~• .} ~f . _ ~, 1. R 4 v~ ~~' j ~~ ~ ~ I ~ f ~ L~, ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 33 > ~ '~ ~: ~ .4 . ~'I .! [ ~ ~ j p ~. ~ iii i. '. .~•. ~~ ~ ~ i ~, I E ~, I 1 f ~ .Y ~ • ,~ CITY OF MERIDWN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, ID 83842 CHANGE ORDER NO. 01 PROJECT NO. CH-06-001 DATE: 06-x08 EFFECTIVE DATE: CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: DESIGNER FLOORS PROJECT: MERIDIAN CITY HALL -Phase 3 Tenant Improvements The Contractor h: hereby directed to make the following changes from the Contract Documents and Plans. Description: Incorporate revisions per ASI's41, 85, 81, 80R, 93 8 PR#01 per attached PCOalE01,dated 5/19/08 ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDRIONS REMAIN THE SAME. Reason for Change Order: Additional scope or revisloru~ per listed ASPS 8 PR Attachments: Change order Items description, dated 5J78/08, with contractor quotes CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES: Original Contract Price $182,354.00 Original Contract Times: Substantial Completion 8!28!06 Nat changes form previous Change Orders Net changes form previous Change Orders No. 00 to 00 No._ to _ (calendar days) $ -0- None Contract Price Prior to this Change Order. Contract Times prior to this Change Order. (calendar days or date) $182,354A0 snsr2oos Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order. Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order. (calendar days or date) $5, 597.00 None Contrail Price with all Approved Change Orders: Contract Times with all Approved Change Orders: (calendar days) $187,851.00 Substantial Completion 8/28!2008 RECOMMENDED: (CONSTRUCTION ~ AGE~J ACCEPTED: (CONTRACTOR) Petra Inc. ` Designer Floors ` By: Thomas R. Cou h{in / By: Dick Brown (~~~~ ~~~ Date: G• ~ ~~ Date: ~ ~ ,~© APPROVED: (CITY P A COt1NCIL APPROVAL ~~~~ / ~ By: Keith Watts Date: ~ . J ~ ~ J5 V Date: APPROVED: (CITY) - TTEST: By: Mayor Tammy de Weerd By: City Clerk, Jaycee Holman Date: Date: ! ^l~RI i f ~ f j ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ :~ ~$ I , , ,, i 1 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ S, ~ ~ Ij I ~ I i~ it ~ ~ ~ ii 3 ;~~~ ~ 0 ~(~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' i ~ ~ ' '! I ~ 2~ ~,,,+++` _ '~ F. ~ ~ ~ ~, F t g ~ P ~ ~ _ 5~ i ~~ ~ ] ~ `~ i ! ~ ~ E , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~', ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ft `3 ~~ A e F ~~ } 3 i t ' j { ~ g ~ C ~ t$ h ~ k [ €: [; a •1 i ~ I i ~,,~_ ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~~ ~ 3.: i ~ [ 3 y 'j ~~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~~ ~ 3 ~ • ~ I ~ ~ ~ 't d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ i ^t ~ a ' r .~ ~ ~I ~~ y ++ 111 ~~ ~ ~ ~ Z I , K, ~,, ~ s ~ r ~ ~ ~I t ~~ t ° 4 ~ ~~', ! n i ,x ~ PROPOSED CHANGE ORDER No. 00001 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE-18'15 _ c~L coNrrRacTOits ~~~ ~ ( ~ 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208 323-4500 • FAX: 208) 323-4507 T~E~ ASI & PR Pricing Phase III DATE: 5/19/2008 PRO]ECT: Meridian tray Hall ]OB: 0(0C75 TO: Attn: Dick Brown CONTRACT NO: 2S Designer Floors 1400 W. Front St Boise, ID 83702 Phone:208-342-4271 Fax:208-342-7245 RE: To: By: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL **All taxes are induded in costs** item Detscript~on {Z,~n~y 00001 ASI#41 Delete Shower Rooms (COR#01) 1.000 00002 ASI#65 Layout Rms 159 & 160 (COR#02) 1.000 00003 PR#01 Mayor Suite Revisions (RFP#02)- Revise 1.000 k~catlon & wnt3guration of the Mayors Suite per owner request. Add 260 LF of base & 10 SY carpet Designer Floors quote 3/25/08 00004 ASI#81 Second Floor Office Revisions {RFP#02)- 1.000 Revise & add office and conference space on Znd Public Works rt Fire Dept areas per owner request Add 374 LF of base & 140 SY of carpet Designer Floors quote 4/29/08 00005 ASI#90R FlNsh Legend Color Selections (COR#03) 1.000 00006 ASI#93 Add Wall @ Rm.257 (COR#04) 1.000 From: Unit Cost: $5,597.00 Unit Tax: $0.00 Lump Sum: $0.00 Lump Tax: $0.00 0~/® GC Markup: $0.00 Total: $5,597.00 APPROVAL: By: Date: ~~;~, Number: Units Unit Price Tax Rate Tax Amount Net Amount LS $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 ~ $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 LS $605.00 0.00% $0.00 $605.00 LS $4,992.00 0.00% $0.00 $4,992.00 LS $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 LS $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 1 signer Floors Date: iay: Lombard Conrad Architects Date: (p~ ~ ~ ~ i j i 1 ~. ;i i i t forL~- +oo n r , ~L rtwr~- 14UO FROM STREET • $OtSE;, 1DAH0 8~yQ2 (208) 3~42.A~271 PHONE (208) 34272x5 FA7C March 25.2008 Petra Yncorporated 9056 West Blackeagle Drive Boise, ID 83709 Attn: Tom Coughlin lte: Meridian Cityr Hall -Price Request #1 e- r ~o r ~oroir fofo.t r-1 r a ~jZ ~ ~ 1 /Yl~ ~~S ~j/~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ l Tom, Please accept this as a formal bid on the above mentioned project. Our base bid includes materials, freight, labor and tax (if applicable. Scope of Work: Add 2601ineal feet Rubber Base $390.00 Add 10 yards Carpet $2 i 5.00 Bid 56Q5.04 Sincerely, R.icd~ard Brovva Presideirt/Owner RB:3Cm + ° ' { 4 8 ` ~ ~ ~ t h t { { v~ {{ } "~~ is ~ ~ iii i N ~ 1 '~~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ' . ~~ k ~ ; i . ^~ 4 7 j :1 h 4' ~ _~ ;' 1 i ~_ )j i ~• d VVo- .',YY jy (.t • 4; 1 i . ttt ~ ~ ~, ~ y ~ ~ 4 2 f , f ~ ek Y 4 ~ l e ~ ~, ~ i9 ~; ~ ~ ~. j ~ ~. . ~: , ~ ~ ~. ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ { ~; ~ `~ 1 ~~ r•w~w. u~ ~~! ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ 7 d ~~ ~ e i : ~ 77 ~'+1~ ~ 1 A ~~ ~ .( t Z 3 t i,~ ~ F i i ~ ~ ~ s j ~ t i~ ' . 7 I ~~ r ~i ~ ~ t I ~: ~~ f ~ i ~ L. ~ 1 i.. ti i ~ ?: ~ r I ~ S ~ 1 I ~ { t ~C r i ~: + ~ E _ ~: ~ t {t F - ~ k1 ~ S its i ~ 7 i 3 ! ~ 11 ~ i !. ~. ~ .~. j i~ ~ ~~ 1 l ` 1 j r ~ f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ` ~' ' 1 i g ~.jx I f ~` ~ I 1 ' ~ I' is ~p 44 t j 7 , 1 A April 29, 2008 ~~ ~~/ v / ~ ~F jr' ., p `~, , Petra Incxuporat~ 9056 Walt Blackeagle Drive Boise, YD 83709 Attn: Tom Coughlin Re: IVleridian City T-Iall ~ ASI 81 Tom, Please accept this as a formal bid on the above mentioned project. Our base bid includes materials, Freight, labor and tax (if applicable). Scope of'~N'ork: Supply and Install 140 yards of Interfacc Carpet Tile and ~Z(pa S~ • 374 lineal feat of 4" Rubber Base. .~i' Bid 54,992.00 . Please Note: Carpet Tile will be s different dye lot. Sincerely, Ricluud Brown PresidentlOwner RB:scm ~~ ~ c {'. s~ ~ 14 ~ ~ ~> ~ ~ ~ 2 i ~, ~ ~ '"' ~~ ~ 1 E L - ~: ~ d 4 ~ .~' 1 ~' ~ b o {. pS¢ ' ~ ~ ~•: r ~~ ~ t ' 1 ~~ t 111 d i1 j f ;" f '~ ~ ? ~ ~ ,~ , ~ P ~ t ~' ~ i i y y ~ ~ ~ C f CCCC~ ~; j ! r ~_ ~ ~ ' 9' ~ ~ ~~ ~ i f '' s t f~ i` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ) ~ i' _; 4 ~~ ~; _ F , e 1 f ! ~ ~ , ~ r~ - ~ ~ ~ ~~ , _3 , f F 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ( +1 ~~ ~ i ~ _ ~ [ 1 iii ~ ~~~ ! F ~ ~. ~i .Z i 4 7 r ~ ~ ~ F i - ~ 7' ~ -. ~ ~:~ } ~ ~_ ~ _ 4. I ~ ~ 11 Ij . ,~ ~ ~, ~z, 6 1 E ; ~ ~ ~ . i ~~~ ~ ~ : ~ t~ € ~ ~ J }i {. ~ I k : ~ ~ i ~ ~ t ~! ~1 4.~ ~ ~ t ~ k i 2 . ,~{oa fltaNr sra~r • ea~s~, iwuto s37o~ . (~)34~427t PHONE - (t~)34~Ti45 FAX 05-13-' 08 07:31 F1~9- ob/12/2008 dEON 7:46 FAX 208 329 4807 Petra Inc. • T-155 P001/001 F-139 I®001/DOS ...s.... - - - .~~ ~ ..~. C~AN~~ ~~~ ~p~~ No.3 G~ ~- 3 ,~2~~ ~. ~~ ~0 2~ ~~ g ~ 1097 N. tt~ARtO sTa~r ~ MERIDIAN. s~ 83642 • PONE: cue) 3d3~S00 • Fnx• Gtr 3a~-asD~ TITLE: ASI~9QR Flnssh Legend Color Select DATE: 5j9/2008 .r,...~_. - PROTECT: Meridian City Hall ]bB: 06x675 TO: Attn: Didc Brown CONTACT NO: 25 D~tgnefi Floors 1400 W. Front St Boise, ID 83702 Phone: 208-342-4271 Fax: ?.Aa-342 7245 ttLa QOR To: AMWALL t7oana PETRA Ntaiulaert OOQ35 ~DEt ~ "' ~t?II~fPI ~OP t~ROtAL' ' ~~ ''. • -' ~ ' ~ ..~~ ., .. ~a , . • ~ .. ' . , :~ ~ r. ,., , ;~: ASI - 9DR Finish ~er:d Color Selecl3ofts Finish Legend: ~e the attached Finish t~egend for a~ InterIor anaterhah: color g~ed5ions. Ref: Finch Legend, dated 4/23/Q8. 'this replace, the AS"S ~ sent previously, if you have any adri~o~ qu~lons on cator sele~oats for mat~eriais contact ]adc Vaughn at the #ob siGa ot~e. . Review the atiatited Por any change tQ our ss:opa•of work and ae~and within flue worldag days. Respond even if ffiis is a na cost cha~tge. Unit t~k: ~O.QO Unit i"BOC; $0.00 Luamp Suana $O.OO GC markeap: $0.00 i.ump Tara #O.ofl Total: $O.OQ APPiftOVALt ]a¢f06 $~ipn® a 1 '.I 7 ~' I ~ i ~ i ~' i ~ ~' ,' ns` ' 3Dlak BAavrn ~Ydsi ~.r~P ~~ 2. ~ ! ' c ~, ~ a F 1 f . Si ~ ~ ~ _t ~! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ' ~ 4 ; " ~ ~ {? t ~ ~ Er :a ~ f F Y ~ t~ i g i 9`~ ~ ~. ~ , ' 4 ` h t ~ ;~ '~ . t, ~ ;, y, ~ fG5-13-' 08 ®6 : 56 Y-- - - ~ - - - - - -- - ---- 1 t • •1-15;i Yldldl/10191 r-1~•r .Q~VVi/ VVV ^~~ I IY~~YYYV-r_ ~~~ 1097 M. RR7d;ARiO • P0?RII~?AA1 ID • 343.4500 • FAl(: 3Z3-4507 'i;[Tll6: ASI-93 A~i Wall ~ RM 257 D~-'1'l8: s/9/2Q08 PRO.~CTr Merld~n CIEy Hal! ]QBa oe~75 'fOz Attn: D1Ck Bra-vm C~NTItAGT NO: 25 t~slgner t~tonrs 14f3Q W. ~ Boise, ID 83702 Done: 2b8-342-x'271 ~a~c: Z08-342-725 . RII~: mR Toa COMPAI Rroarl: PET'{jA Naenbera 00016 ~~~~•~~~'~...51,~~.Siys • .aL. • h .<. ~~w.e 7 ~' 7)"tr • ' .. _ •: Y•Y + .:5.:.. V.t{7;~:-ryro : •' a•' •,q •. ». »•'K . ~ v .. . o t• ASi,93 Add Waq (~ Room ?.57 Assistant Warmers. • S>~t A2.227: Per the w~vners pr~vIde a waq at tlza Aunt Plenat~s ~?.~7, as shown on• the encloses skebr~ 5K-1., ~~ sn~oa. . . Rc~e~nr and respond vWth any change ~ yaur slaps of wank wFlfiin five wortcirag days, please respond even if tt~s a no cost chaat~e/ UIU't COSt: ~.QO Uadt Tana $ppq ~tantp'Sasnlt $Q.Qp GC atea~'katps $O.OG • Lump Tax: $iD,.pQ Yodels ~tppp Ay'PROVAL: DeD~ C 1t~i$t BFOWA ~ f i~ 3 2~ ~ A ~ ^ ~~~ i i ~ ' '~ ~ ~ ~ } i ~ ` ~ 1 ti~ !fie °,~ ~ { ~ ~ { ~ i ~ i i S { 0 C " t i ~ h r + h h i ~a ~ t , ` . ,, e~ q ! L ~ s ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ y i { t ~ l z 4~ j ~' 8 i ~ ty, f~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~5 ~ ~ ~~ ~ a . ~ Z ? ~ ~, J l~ . ~ .3 ~ j , ~ ~ i ~ ~ i : S ~ ~ ~ s € ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ` r ~ 1 1 ~; ~ f ~ ~ ! i~ ~.~ ~ ~ ; . Y 4 ~ ~ 1 ~ ' i S . 1 y ~' ~ ~ ~ i ,q, ~ + ~ I ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ` pR ~ ~ ~ ~ 1i, cctt `_~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 . ~~. ~~. ~ ~. ~ i ~'. . 1 I ~! ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ t ~ 3 k•.? #. .- - ~' ` ;. ~ e l ~~ ;-' f :~. ~ , , ~ , MERIDIAN CITY HALL PROJECT NO: CH-00-001 DESIGNER FLOORS -Phase 3 (25) CHANGE ORDER NO 1 05/16/08 CHANGE ORDER ITEMS Page 1 of 1 1 ASI 41 Delete Shovler Rms (COR#01} 0.00 2 ASI 65 Layout Rms 159 8160 (COR#02) 0.00 3 PR 01 Mayor Suite Revisions (RFP-02) x.00 Revise location 8 configuration of the Mayors SuitevO~, puJx~~^ /~(y$jutbg~ Add 260 LF base 810 SY carpet. Designer Floors quote 3/25/08 4 ASI 81 Second Floor Office Revisions (RFP-02) 4,922.00 Revise 8 add office and conference space on 2nd Public Works 8 Fire Dept areas,~Ql., ~`Qv~3 Add 374 LF of base 8 140 SY of «~rpet Designer Floors quote 4/29/08 5 ASI 90R Finsh Legend Color Selections (CORfi`03) 0,Q0 6 ASI 93 Add Wall ~ Rm 257 (COR~04) 0.00 5,527.00 s e June l3, 2008 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Finance Department ITEM NO. 6-8-4 REQUEST Seal Co. Change Order No. 2 for work on Loading Dock in Original Budget but Not Yet Bid for the Not to Exceed Amount of $2,750.00 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See aftached CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: I CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. r . 't~ >~. ~' ~ ' S ~ ~ t ~ ~ ( 4 4 ~; ~ ~ ~; I ~ ~ ~ C ,~ Y ~i ~ ~ ~ a ` ~ ~ ;: s ., ~ a i P~ ~ ~ f~ ,~ ~ 3 ~ ' ~ ~~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ' ; i I; -~ ' f ~ ~ ,5 ~~ " r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~' F ~ , ! i; ~ ~ ~ R t ~ , i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~i ~ : ~ ~ ~ 9~9 t ., ~ ,~ ~~ a.r ~ ~_ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; ~.~ 5 I n , ~ ti ; p ; h ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ - ~, r ; ~ ~ F f ~t ~ -I , ~ ~;_ p- i ~ > f , ~ ~ 'D . ~ ~~ _~; ~ i. r 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ s~o-~ -t i < < I ~~. ~ ~ . ~ ~'` ~ ~ i ,_ ~ ~ I 3 ~ , i i 3, CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, ID 83842 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER CHANGE ORDER NO. 02 PROJECT NO. CH-08-001 DATE: 6/IJ~ EFFECTIVE DATE: CONTRACTOR: SEAL CO. PROJECT: MERIDIAN CITY HALL -Phase 2 Cold Core 8 Shell The Contractor Is hereby directed to make !fie following changes from the Contr~t Documents and Plana. DescNption: Iruxrporate re~dslons to ASIti3ti- Load(ng Dock per attached PCOi12 ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SAME. Reason for Change order: Addinonal scape of revisions to ASId35 Attachmerrts: CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: GRANDE IN CONTRACT TIME8: Original Contract Price $ 67,182.00 Original Contract Times: Substerdial Campletton 8/28/06 Net changes form previous Change Orders Net changes form previous Change Orders No._ to 01 No.,_,_ to _ (calendar days) $22,388.00 None Contract Prig Pr~r to this Change Order. Contract Timae prior to this Change Order. $89 570 00 (celen~r days a date) , . ~~ Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Ord: Net In~ease (decrease) of this Change Order. 750 $2 00 (~~~ ~ or dotal , . Norte Contract Prime with all Approved Ghange Orders: Contract Ttrtt~ wdh aA Approved Change Orders 592,320.00 {caterdsr days) SubstanSai Completion 8J28/2008 RECOMMENDED: (CONSTR ER) PETRA INC ACCEPTED: (CONTRACTOR) SEAL CO Date:om CoughAn ~~y! By: Mike Devaney ` D ata: ~, y 0 APPROVED: (CITY PUR G COUNCIL AP OVAL Kehr, Watt .. ~ ~~~ ,.~~•('''~uur- , Dam: ~L/ - ~~ `, `` APPROVED: (C ATTEST: ` ~ By: Mayor smmY de W Date: iiP ` (~ - _ 13y: Ciiy C~dt, S "~7~rM3fld l~'t h( p ,. _ 7 i "`'~~-., --, A i~ c0 ~~~ ,~~ , ,,,, '~~iularr • ,~,.'. ~~~ry'rptyMA"'~*' 5 E C ~ ~ , ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ j ~ w ~ ! 7 i I , ~ I ~ hk i ! { tt~ ~Ya i ' ~~ ~ ~ ~ t r s +' ~ I1 i 7 t ~ 1 I f~ i ~ ; I i 4 r ~ I i ~ ~ ` ~ ~C ~~ si i ` ' $~ : ~ ~ I~ I ~~ ! ~ i F_ z l ~ i ~ -~ { ~ i ~ ii ~ ~= ~ fy F y, ,+ ~ E* , I ° 1 . ~ ? ~ ~{: ~ ~ 1 s ~ ' I I 4 t s t ti ~ [ I ~ " ~ ~ {, 1 .~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ _ ~ ~" ~ t~ s C ~ ' s ! f' ' ;i # , . , ~ ~ i { ~ f' ~ ~ a~ i ~, ~ i 3 ~ ~ ' ;~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ g c I ~. h ~, I ~ I ~ ~~ i ~ I 7 , it ~ lI F ~ a 7 ..~ ' i ii(t ~ j' i ~ ~ 1 r i Sl li_ a 1 $ i I E C~ ~J • ~~~~ ~~ ~~Y~~~ ~~,~ ~~~r~ ~.C~ To: Jaycee Holman, Ciiy Clerk From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Agent CC: Tara Green, Stacy IClchenmann, Council, Tom Coughlin Date: 6/13/08 Re: June 17 City Council Department Report The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be plao~ on the June 17 City Council Agenda under Department Report. Seal Co. Chance Order #2 Additional work oer Architect's Suoaiemental Instructions "ASI" #35. All work under this Change Order #2 will be cx~mpleted pursuant to the existing Moisture Protection 8~ Waterproofing contract dated May 8, 2007. Total contract amount is now $92,320.00. Budget for this ~ntract is $97,223.00 which we are still under by $4,903.00. Recommended Council Actiion: Approve Change Order #2 to Seal Co. for additional Moisture Protection and Waterproofing work for the loading dock per the attached, for a Not To-F~cceed amount of $2,75t?.t?0 authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest. Thank you for your consideration. • Page 1 ~~ i i° } L'. { 1~ fc ~, ff ~ p ,- {. ~ ~. ~3 1 }p} i 1 `. ~; ;.. ~I 1t. " s 4 ~~ a r ~ @ ~ +' r ~ ,~ ' ~I l i a ~ - ,r ~ s ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~y t ` 7 ~ ~Y ~ ~,' ( (. t~ 1 Il~ , ,.- q l i t . ~ ~ a, ' ~ , ~ ~ ~ t~ . it r - S i ~ ~ ~ F _ ~ v ., ~~ t ? ~ ~ ,~ S ~{ t~.~ ~ ~,~ ~ t ti { F~i s 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E, ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ t r ~ i ; ~ r ~ i r, :~i t =~ ^ ~~ ; ~ ~ S 77 l ! t h~ 1 t~ t i f . ~ 1g 1 '~~ , t ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ,~ ~ ~ f G' ; i ~ _ , t ~ ~ ' ~ E ` y~{ ~ {{ u CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, ID 83642 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER CJ CHANGE ORDER NO. 02 PROJECT NO. CH-06-001 DATE: 6/4/08 EFFECTNE DATE: CONTRACTOR: SEAL CO. PROJECT: MERIDIAN CITY HALL -Phase 2 Cold Core & Shell The Contractor Is heretry directed to make the following changes from the Contract Documents and Plans. Description: Incorporate revisions to ASI#35- Loading Dock per attached PCO#2 ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SAME. Reason for Change Order. Additional scope of revisions to ASi#35 Attachments: CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES: Original Contract Price $ 67,182.00 Original Contract Times: Substantial Completion 8/208 Net changes form previous Change Orders Net changes form previous Change Orders No., to 01 No.^ to _ (calendar days) $22,388.00 None Contract Price Prior to this Change Order. Contract Times prior to this Change Order. (calendar days or date) $89,570.00 8/28/2008 Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order: Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order. (calendar days or date) $2, 750.00 None Contract Price with all Approved Change Orden:: Contract Times with aA Approved Change Orders: (calendar days) $82,320.00 Sul>rstantlal Completion 8/28/2008 RECOMMENDED: (CONSTRUC MANAGER) PETRA INC ACCEPTED: (CONTRACTOR) SEAL CO By: Tom Coughlin By: Mike Devaney Date: ~/it/// ~ Date: G 7 ~' APPROVED: (CITY PUR S G GE COUNCIL AP ROVAL By: Keith Watts c~ Date: ~ , ~ ~,_~ X LJ Date: APPROVED: (CITY) • ATTEST: By: Mayor Tammy de Weerd By: City Clerk, Will Berg Jr. Date: Date: i , 3 I Z ~~ ' i 5 B '. [ i n ~ dia `. E F. ~ ~'~ 7 R i f' ; , t ~~ ~ ~. ~ it; ~ E ~ `' ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ II I r ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~> ~ i ~ x i j~ (' ~p t [ ~~ . ~ s ~ ~ F i; i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j , # f ~ } i ~ is '~ , .~ ~E ' ~~ a ,: ~ ~~Ff i ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ .~ ~ ~! i a. r ~ ~ y+- ~ i o; 7 ' ~ , j ~ yy ~ r ~ I ' ~~ .. ~1 I' ~ F { i te'. 1 i '~ i ~ ;' ~ F f' g ' '. ' 4 ~ ~ ~, . '~ S ,~ f. ~ . #, . ~ ~i t y i x _ i ~~ _ i ~ i b~ i 1 '. 1 l ~ I 6 (3 ~ ! i p ~ s ~ ~ z ~ 1~ l a ~.. s ~T_ ~ ~ ~. ~ r U I i ~ ~! l r jti i i t ! ~i, k ! .; ~ ~ 1f ! i t P OPOSED CHANGE ORDER No. 00002 323-4500 BOISE, IDAHO RCE-1875 1097 N. ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208} 323-4507 TITLE: ASI Pricing Phase II DATE: 5/20/2008 PROJECT: Meridian City Nall ]OB: 060675 TO: Attn: Mike Devaney CONTRACT NO: 12 Seal Co. P.O. Box 887, Meridian 8368D 223 W Broadway Meridian, ID 83680-0~7 Phone:208-~7-3646 Fax:208-887-3882 RE: To: From: Number: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL **All taxes are included in costs** Item Description Quantity Unite UnR Price Tax Rate Tax Amount Net Amount 00001 ASI#35 Loading Dods (COR#01)- Provide 1.000 LS $1,182.00 0.00% $0.00 $1,182.00 waterproofing and drainage mat on building wall at load'mg dodo. SealCo quote 4/25/08 00002 ASI#35 Loading Dock (COR#01)- Provide joint 1.000 LS $148.00 0.00°!0 $0.00 $148.00 sealants far screen wall and loading dock area. SealCo quote 4/4/08 00003 ASI#35 Loading Dock (COR#01)- Provide 1.000 LS $1,420.00 0.00% $0.00 $1,420.00 waterproofing & mat on building wall at the front entrance. This was not included when the twilding was raised 4'. SealCo quote 4/16/08 Unit Cost: $2,750.00 Unit Tax: $0.00 lump Sum; $0.00 Lump Tax: $0.00 0% GC Markup: $0.00 Total: $2,750.00 APPROVAL: ~ ~ ~- $Y~ By: Date: ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ Date: EcpeL~liun x f ~~ f. l ' ~ ~' f_ ~~^ t ~ I I ? ~ i j ~~: ~ 1 ~ ~ i '; I; ~ I ~, i I ~ ~ ~: s .. ~ ~ `~ iE i , ti ; ~ ~ ~ ~ :i t~E qjr ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ;s s~' ~3 ~ ~ I ~ { t ~~ ~ _a ~ ~ ~ ~- s' xy 'I y ¢ 3 ~ ~~ I ~ ~~ t ~ ~ gg i 3 ~ ~ ~ I ! I t ~ ~ ~ ' ~~~ i Q, 7 I s Is li ~ ' . ' ~ ~ . 1 ~ e ; ~ ~ r ~ i, ~ ~ ~ ~ t a; + ~ 8 ; ~~ r ~ i i' ~ ~' f 1 i ; ~ i s, t~ If ~; ~ ~ ,, ~ , ~ ~ {; ~ ~ r ~ ,, ~~ ~ S ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ a 5 ~ 3 ' ipp t,~. ~ i~~ ~ ~ t' !d ~ ~~ ' j ` i 3 ~ E i ~i a f ~ ~, : tt} ,~ • MERIDIAN CITY HALL PROJECT NO: CH-06-001 SEALCO -Phase 2 (12) CHANGE ORDER NO 2 CHANGE ORDER REMS 05/21/08 1 ASI 35 Loading Dods (COR#01) Provide waterproofing and drainage mat on building wall at loading dodo. SealCo quote 4/25/08 2 ASI 35 Loading Dods (COR#01) Provide joint sealants for screen wall and loading dock area. SealCo quote 4/4/08 2 ASI 35 Loading Doric (COR#01) Provide waterproofing >~ mat on building wall at the front entrance. This was not included when the building was raised 4'. Seal Co quote 4/16!08 1,182.00 148.Q0 1,420.00 2,750.00 ~~ ~~~ E ~;. ~ ~ ~ i" ..1 ~ ~ ~', 3 { Y: f Y_ ~'~. : ~, ~_ i Y . $~ ~ ~; I ~ i; - : ' I' ~ : t r ~:, L ~ 1 S ~ 9 ~ f ~ F, ~ ~ , :~ c j: ~ : ; ~ ~ , ~ i M'' li: ~ 3 f : 5.. ~ '~ ~' ~ Page 1 of 1 J ~ ~ ~ ! 2 717. ~ ; f {~` . ~~ 1 a t lip ' `~~ i [ }u l'1' + ~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~' ; _ ~; ~ ; ; C' i ~' ' ( ~ i 4 ` ~ , ~ ``. ;~ ~~ #~ d t ~ ~ i~ t ~l C. ~_ ~{~~ ~. j ~S Q 7 ~ ~ t a { ~i ,. ( ii f~~:P _ i t t~ ` 1 ~ < y~ ' ~ < ~ >, t .: + t ~ 3 rrr ~ ~ i 1 i i:~ i. k ~ ' ~ ' ~ ,, , r , : ~, ,: , ;; } I 1 ~ , ` i ` ~ y ~ ~ , e ~ ~ t , ~ ~ ~± >I i j Y }} 1 C ~~ t t+ ~ E . <. ,; ~., rtpr c~ un auz o~ta • can ~ r-~ooc 0 P.U. BOX 887 _ Meridian, ID 83680 Phone: 208-887-3646 Fay 208-887-3882 p.a ~$ ~, 6~ G~ CHANGE ORDER REQUEST PROJECT: Meridian City Hall Loading Dock ATTENTYON; Tom DATE: Apri125, 200$ ITEM NO. . 1. Provide labor and material for Waterproofing and Drainage mat for below grade portion of loading dock as per ASI 35. 1~r/,~~. p~~ ~~~ ~L ~><.xsZ.oo- This work and/or amount is not included in the origurial contract. Please send a change order, for this work to be con~npleted. This propwui is muhmitted under the oostditiaael uec of the AIA 401 Goatraet or the AGC/A$A/A.SC Sttstfdosd Sulx~anltect. Uc~y~ u diffaront oontrart mny add addtrios~ai costa noel exrlueioaa Cie. vr~ad #3d0 OO is o~eaot ti.~e ton to A~Mf b!a der X000. orhioh is vn b~aaun iost~,a of gon+ehu~e ender. 'trite price ie prodicatod upon. tho ooadiflan that we shall rcrcia- Prompt monthly payntcirt for the valuo of work properly prrW~rrmA and materiel deSvcr+ed. and thnt payment can be wlthheM only >ao rho extent that tim owa~ar is withhaldirr~ dv~ M dctlctrl~dcs !n our work. Re:tatopge Itt>titl not exrxed live percml. l~~s aubmittcd by ttu: Sis~ of the m®atta aro duo and ,payable by the !Om d' t1a• fdlonrizg month. F~natly, sad uakeal otherar3ar. ctiirtcndcd in avtigtig ~ SL+'AL W. this bid including nny such mndi~ttaaa. r+hM remNA cBct~lve and will not be further mortified ar withdrawn for 30 ds~ys from the bid. TA7C >~C~.IIDEa~P87'AZ.LF.D P~.i<C gi0]AOKBt xo. a~as~~e-a (o~~oov~W-WSSta~ Raa~sl Idaho• 4ra1 Co F'Ch:-4G 10 ~ WaaLtn~a. Srttl Co ~AI.G"044NR ~ lDi~on 8ral Cu x carlwnrti~w of Idaho ~kit15 a eloataa+t- 152813 ~ ~I e~ ~'~ i ! , ' i i~ i ~ ~ ~~~~ I t 3 3# ' ~i . } ~ i i r } ~ 4 ~ . ~ i ~ ~ . .: i ~ '~ ',r i ~ti i ~ ! ~ ~ 1; j ~ ' 'I ~ I f' ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ T' ' 3 1 a ~ ~~ ! 3 ~ t .~ ))~. 1 - ~ i y ~ '; ~ {~ ~ ~ I i j I '7 z. ~ }' St t i} {` } 2 `A Lt'' n fl fi 4i ,, i. ~•~ LWY _~ ~ VV. ..v ~ rirvvv . 0 P.O. BOX 88? Meridian. ID 83680 Phone: 208-88?-3646 Fax: 208-887-3882 • ww~/ vv ~~~ ~ ~~.. G6~ 0 CHANGE ORDER RE~?~UEST PROJ•EG''T: Meridian City Hall ATTENTION: John Anderson DATE: Aprll 16, 200 j'I'EM NO. I . Provide/labor and material for extra waterproofing due to grade change /~~~ /a~l~ ~j ~~ ~~ .. fi 1.20.00 . yx d 20 y rr~ .~~b ~a /~~'~ ~ ~ This work and/or amount is not included in the original contract. Please send a change order, for this work to be cx~mpleted. 'i'hia prc~cwnl ix •n~lnr~ilJ:xl ~mdar• Ihr. ismdiL&mwl uxa of Iho AIA ~tll t:~snlrarl ar Ihr. At:C./A.~1A/A.y(: ~llnnclrad :~iu~nnlrxcL U~d»g a dlffeCmt contract mey add addlt10IIe1 costs Dad eaciusions. ear goofs Hades $2,000.00 (two thoaeaad dalla:s~ aha1L be awarded by . pns~ohaQe ordes acrd ao setaiaage mq be w,thheld. seat co. will add $aeO.oo iia coat:aat adadaistsatje sees to a>+iz bid reader ¢2,000.00 which is ..s:aea by ooaesat, instead of ~. 'It»ix }niar. tx Irrtxlicalaxxl ~rlxm Ihr. csmdiLi~m lhni. vrc xttx~ll rcarivr Immm~, rrumlhty lit fcA the vahrr. of work prc~ly prskirmcxi ~md ~naitaiat dalixaYSi, an~i 1}uA. yutyrnc~L elm lua wilhhatd ~mly u~ lhr. cstLc~4 IhaL Ihr. ovmrr iK wiihhnlding dt~r. 4~ tltiicirnch~ in our waAc. Itetelr-aRe shall not exceed flue percent $llllap$ subunHted b7- the 25"' of the month are due and payable by file 10* of the folloavin~ mtmlh. 1+'inaf~y. end unless otherwise extended la wtitto~ from BICAL GO. this bid lacludln~ any such modlflcatleas. shell rermaln effective and will rnA tx: fialher mtx3iticii i~ wilhdrxwn ~i~r :lp cix fntrn Ihr.1Md. Taz arctanan~rerssn rvBrac wo>~gs xo. i tae 1-C-4 (o~ 1 ocme2o}-virss/nss [ia~o~ Idaho- :kxl (~~ Ft(:MriH 1 p e Washiagtoa~- b3ral (:~~ :1hJ11d:~'IN~Nk d Omgou' :kxl (k~ x acx~xawlhm of ldwh~~ 98:i(ui m Nonfarm-152819 3 i ~ ~ i ~ ~ i } E i ~ I ~ ' ~ I ~ 3 ` ~ ~ `! ~I ~ . ~ t f y ~ i ~ ~ ~' af _ ~ r S ~ ' ~ x } i; ~ ~ ~ ~ f ( z i r ~ ~ i' [ i ~' ~ } ~ i i ~ ~ P. i '~ 3 ~ ~~ ~ { '~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ I ~ I i f ` ~ J7 ~ i b ~ j ~$ ~' r 3~ z 4 f '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ `~ ~ ' a ~ ~'~; ~ ~ I y ~~ o~ ~ 3 ~ j If } ~ ' d 1 ~ ~ f f. i ~ ~ , f; ~ ~. ~ ~ I'~I ~ C. ~ (' I ~ 3 ~~ s ~~ ~~ f ' ~ r `~ ~ ~ E s I ~ ' i ~' I ~ { ~ E s' C ii ~ ~ '- 9 _~ I ~ . ~ ~~ ~ ( ~ ' ~ 1 ~ ~~~ i f ~ Eli .~i ~ ~. :' :: F ~ i {t; ~ ~. ;~ f E f . I . iE f _ ,,, w.. 'a/ •v/ rvvw r. r. .o. Rpr 04 08 06t52a • p.o. sox 887 Meridian, ID &36$0 Phone: 208-887-3646 Fax: 208-887-3882 ~YL~ PRQPC)SAL ~~~~ ~ ~~ Gad, ~l PROJECT: Meridian City Hall ASI 35 .ATTENTION: ~. DATE: Apri14, 2008 WC ARE PLEASED TO QUOTETHE FOLLOWINt3 ON THE VE REFERENCED PROJF.CI: z ~. ITEM NO. __: °'' o 1. Pro`ride Labor and mate ,rill for joint sealants forrscreen~ wall gild loading dock. ~ . .00 .., AL'Y'L~'kN~1TIs5i: if y~ arc a e:o:etradcr ttho ncqu~CS latsRnaRc to tied e~oct'additiottal iaatu+ad on a ptrlmaq asd nos-aea~adbabssy basis' as as1 addcd h>aurateco rogniremcnt, you aecd uradd Q to thiia bid.l7ein doeec trot utrect the aorteeal "additirstml iteasteted• imtguage. i is au6m~fad under the ao4ditimLd uae of tha AfA 401 (?ontrnd or tins Aa(:/ASA/ASC ts~mldat+d blxboonb'i-Ct. Ueing a dim oonbfoet may add additionoi costs and e:raLeaions. C~a. will addd t~3S0. ~ admi~ds ~~ l~aos !+a ~ bfd ~.OO~w3~ Is w~ ~cuatroetiaatead ~ pombRSe ~~ ibis petce b pa+odi~od upon rice ootidtotoa ~ vro ateail roooitre prampq nmoatht~+ ptgrment for the value a[raric p*~Y l~~ e+d mortadal dctivctod. and that can be w[thttadd onlyto the o>tmat that the osncr is ~vlthholdtag duo to dadcdaad~ la out vroiic. ~Retaiaade abatl not eeteecd Svc pa+ceat. aubmiued by t6a ~ o[ the tecaath net due cad patyabic fry tha 10"~ d teas fonaar,~ . . . r i~r. aired uatea# othcivriae esteAdcd is aeithgt Gram S[fAL q0. tMs b1d aedading any saN~ modtticattotts, ebatt r+cmadr- oSacCtvt and will not be Itndhet taodi6ed ar wiWdra<Nru for 70 dse~nr tram'the UW. TA7C iQ~e~D>~-1~STA~.T+lID >~08~C WORR9 AO. 12381 (07100.OT9zOhWt~ adatf~el 1aaLe• t3eal co RC>ti.asto - ttlshtnYto~a t~ t"a t,~tc~+~aa4etR - ors~ae• :5c~t Co a e~orporatson of ItlWea 99305 • 7tivattuaa-157813 - 2oe~e7-aea2 p. i June 13, 2008 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Finance Department ITEM NO. 6-8-5 REQUEST Hobson Change Order No. 3 for City Requested Change in Scope fnr the Nnt to Fv(~oo~^I dm~~ ~n+ ~.f Qitn A~~ nn AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See attached CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: I CITY FIRE DEPT: I CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the Ctiy of Meridian. CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, ID $3642 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER CHANGE ORDER NO. 03 PROJECT NO. CH-0$-001 DATE: 06B/08 EFFECTIVE DATE: CONTRACTOR: HOBSON FABRICATING PROJECT: MERIDIAN CITY HALL -phase 3 Tenant Improvements The Contactor la hereby directed to make the follotivin8 changes from the Contract Documents and Plans. Dssulption: Incorporate revialons per ASI'+1~18 PR# 01 8~ 02 per attached PCOS3, dated tiHBl~ ALA OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SAME Reason for Change Order. Addltiorrai scope or revislorns per Ihited ASNs and PR's Attachments: Change order items description, dated BH 6J08, vrith contractor quotes CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME8: Original Contract Price $2,060,000.00 Original Contrail Tunes: Substar~al Completlon 8/28/ Net changes form previous Change Orders Net changes form previous Change Orders No. 01 to 02 $11 276 00 No._ to _ icale~er days) , . ~~ Contract Prita~ Prior to this Change Orr: Contract Times prior to this Change Omer. $2,071,276.00 ~~ day. ~ date) 8/2812008 Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order. Net increase (derxease) of the Change On~r: $40 499 00 {celeadar days or date) , . Nane Contras Price with all Approved Change Orden:: Contract Times with aU Approved Change Orders: Sz,111,ns.oo . ceauer~dardays, Subtrtantial Completion $/2812008 RECOMMENDED: (CONSTRUCTION GER) ACCEPTED: (CONTRAC Petra Inc. ~' Hobson Fabricati By: Thomas R. CoughUn By: Ted Frisbee, Jr Date: G' ~.~ ~ Date: ~ APPROVED: (cnY PURC N CO L APPROVAL By: Keith Watts ~~,,~ ~ •~ ~ ~~ Date: ~ _ ~ -C7 ~ Date: ~ ~ ~ ~ - +, APPRO~~.; aTTEST: ~ - By: Mayor Tammy de ro Date: p '' ~ (~ Q gy, ~h Cle aycee ~~ ~ Date: ~ ~ a ~, ~~ ..a °r i 3~ I I ~ i ' ~ ~~ ~ ~ c? ~ ~ ~ i ~~ $ ~ I 1 ~ ~ j ~ '' ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ i ~: ~ ~ ~ E ~ i r ~r i ~ .~ ~~ '~ , ~ ~, ~ i ~ I ~ `~ 4a; ~ ~; E E ° ~ i f ~ ~9 i ~ ~e ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ;i T ~ F ~ z u ri - v i ~ . t; ~ ; ~ I i 4 ~ L i ~ , li E ti ~ II i ~~ ~ ~'} iii E,~ ~ i ' ~ S I ~ ~ ~ ,. ~ ~~ ~ ; ~, ~ I o i I ~ ~ ~' ;~ i e f it I ~ I ~ ;i ~ ~f 1 a y t ~ ii f '~ Q ~6,. i } ~ f} i A. a ar ' ~ i '~ , ( ~ 4 ~. k ~ ~ ~~~ , ` ~ j ~ i f. ;'. " ~ ' _. ~k ff 1. ' ''! -. ~. ~.~ ~ _::: psi. ... ~ .~. .. - y ~~ ~. '~ ~ ?~. k~ r ~ .d ~i i. !. To: Jaycee Holman, City Clerk IFram: Keith Watts, Purchasing Agent CC; Tara Green, Stacy IGlchenmann, Council, Tom Coughlin Date: 6/13/08 Re: June 17 City Council Department Report The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the June 17 City Council Agenda under Deparftmerrt Report. Hobson Fabricating Corporation Change Order #3 Additional work per Architect's Supalemental Instructions "ASI° #81. All work under this Change Order #3 will be completed pursuant to the existing HVAC ~ntract dated July 17, 2007. Total contract amount is now $2,111,775.00.00. Budget for this contract is $2„150,000.00 which we are still under by $38,225.00. Recommended Council Action: Approve Change Order #3 to Hobson Fabricating Corporation for additional HVAC work per the attached documentation, for a Not To-F~cceed amount of $40,499.00 authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest. Thank you for your consideration. • Page 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, ID 83842 CHANGE ORDER NO. 03 PROJECT NO. CH-06-001 DATE: Q6/5/08 EFFECTIVE DATE: CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: HOBSON FABRICATING PROJECT: MERIDIAN CITY HALL -Phase 3 Tenant Improvements The Contractor is hereby directed to make the fallowing changes from the Contract Documents and Plans. Description: Incorporate revisions per ASI'081 8 PR# 01 8 02 per attached PCO#3, dated SH9i08 ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SANE. Reason for Change Order. Additional scope w revisions per listed ASI's and PR's Attachments: Change order Items description, dated 5118/08, with contractor quotes CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES: Original Contract Price $2,0$0,000.00 Original Contract Times: Substantial Completion 8/28/08 Net changes form previous Change Orders Net changes form previous Change Orders No. 01 to 02 No._ to _ (calendar days) $11,276.00 Nane Contract Price Prior to this Change Order. Contrail Times prior to this Change Order. (calendar days or date) $2,071,276.00 8/28/2008 Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order. Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order. (calendar days or date) $40,499.00 None Contrail Prig with all Approved Change Orders: Contrail Times with all Approved Change Orders: (calendar days) $2,111,775.00 Substantial Completion 8/28/2008 RECOMMENDED: (CONSTRUCTION GER) ACCEPTED: (CONTRA Petra Inc. -' Hobson Fabricati By: Thomas R. Coughlin By: Ted Frist>~, Jr Date: ~ 3r ~ Date: s APPROVED: (CITY PuRC IN ~ COU IL APPROVAL By: Keith Watts Date: ~ , ~ _O ~ Date: APPROVED: (Cn~ - ATTEST: By: Mayor Tammy de Weerd By: City Clerk, Jaycee Holman Date: Date: :~ PROPOSED CHANGE ORDER ~ No. 00003 323-450U BOISE, IDAHO RCE-1875 r xocg ~oiaa~ ~ GENERAL CONT~tACT~OR3 ~3 1097 N ROSARIO STREET • MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • PHONE: (208) 323-4500 • FAX: (208) 323-4507 T~-E~ PR & ASI Pricing Phase III DATE: 5/19/2008 PROJECT: Meridian City Hall SOB: 060675 TO: Attn: Ted Frisbee, Jr. CONTRACT NO: 33 Hobson Fabricating Corp. 6428 Business Way Boise, ID 83716 Phone: 343-5423 Fax: 343-~F46 RE: To: From: Number: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL **All taxes are included in costs** item Description Quantity Units Unit Price Tax Rate Tax Amount Net Amount 00001 PR#01 Mayors Suite Revisions (R~#Ol)- Revise 1.000 LS $5,351.00 0.00% $0.00 $5,351.00 location & tonflguratlon of the Mayors suite. Hobson quote 3/24/08 00002 PR#02 C02 Monitoring (RFP#02)- Add 28 wall 1.000 LS $28,835.00 0.00% $O.QO $28,835.00 mounted C02 sensors. Hobson quote 4/23/08 00003 ASI#81 Office Revi~ons 2nd Floor (RFP#04)- 1.000 LS $6,313.00 0.00% $0.00 $6,313.00 Revise & add office and conference space on 2nd Public Works & Flre Dept areas. Hobson quote 5/2/08 Unit Cost: $40,499.Q0 Unit Tax: $0.00 Lump Sum: $0.00 Lump Tax: $0.00 0% GC Markup: $0.00 Total: $40,499.00 APPROVAL: / By: ~ B1-~ ~~ ~~!/~/4 mbard Conrad Architects bson F rice "n~ Cor . Lo Date: ~O ~~ ® Date: m . u/ Date: IP `1 I D'6 kxpedition ~ } a_ ~ 1 ~ i ~ F i B ~ e. i+ ' .~ ~ I f ~ ~~ I~` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ `{r ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ fi; , k ( ~ r ~ ~i . ~ ,. r a fi ~ t ~ ~ ~~ .~- I ~ f t '' ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f f~ ~ _ j , . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ,{ ~ ~~~ ~ ~` i ~ ~ i ~ i t { ~ , 'I ; I P i ~ c. 7.; F a x ~ .y i c. ~ r I ~ ' s~ 1. ~ ,; t ~ ~ ~ i E 4 ~a ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~l ~ rE~ Z 3 [[C" ~ ~ ` ~: ' I t AAERIDIAN CITY HALL PROJECT NO: CH-06-007 HOBSON FABRICATING -Phase 3 (33) 05/16/08 CHANGE ORDER NO 3 CHANGE ORDER ITEMS 1 PR Oi Mayors Suite Revisions (RFP-01) 5,351.00 Revise location & configuration of the Mayors Suite. Hobson quote 3/24/08 PR 02 C02 Monitoring (RFP-02) 28,835.00 Add 28 wall mourited C02 sensors Hobson quote 4/23108 ASI 81 Office Revisions 2nd Flr (RFP-04) 6,313.00 Revise $ add office and conference space on 2nd Public Works ~ Fire Dept areas. Hobson quote 512/08 40,499.00 Page 1 of 1 Va/t4/cv~o io.co rnn c~ouyuvcu~ ~~uo~un 1'flY111Yfllipu ~ ~VVI~VVJ I FABR/CAT/NQ, JNC ~Vlechanical / BVAC Contractor ~t Custom Fabricating 6428 Business 'OVay. Boise Id, 83716 PH. ?.a8.343-5423 RAX 343-5446 ~~ cs rM r~ ~ TO: Tom Coag~l~n ,Date 3/24/2008 Petra Phone: r'~; (208} 323-4507 ,~I~er~d~an City .Flall cc: From Ted Frisbee ,Tr, Number Of Pages Project Number 4932 BEMARBSr ^ Utgas~ ^ Poryoru~ roview ^ EegrlyASAP ^ Ple~o ConuruAr T0111, Attached i9 ow quote for PR # 1, Ted Frisbee Jr. ~2 ~1 /n~~o~-s s~~-~ C~~'~ X01 ,. i a , ~~ E i€ ~ { . x , ~ ~ a ~ ~~ t C ~ '~ ~~~ ~t ~` ~; r { ~ j i ~ ~ ~ ~ f ra i fs ~ ~ ~ ~. r i €, ~ ' E' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~', ~ '~. ~ ' 3 ~ ~;yy ~ t ~,~YY pp ~ ~~ ~ ~. z G i b ~ x p 3 S~ ~ ~ (. 1-~ ~ . ~ a ' I! ~ ~; ~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ' ~ r ~ r ! ~ f ~ L' r ? ~~ { p • ~, ~ ~ 2 t j ~ ~Y~ ~ { G !i r% ~i ~` fr - + ~ ~ ~: 1 • p J .G. ~I ~i li ~ ~ i o t 3 '~ j v ~ ~ ~ ~f ,'F I a.~ ~ l ~~ i I ~. ~ ~ ~ T L. : F ~ i. ,;,~ ~, ~ t VV(L9f LVVY IY.LY { III. LVVYTVVLV~ IIVYV VI. IIIVIti VIIIl1.N ~ ~rr..f VVV 1i ~)6'~u~iiii, HQ®SGN FABRICATINi3~ INC. Gaze eusiNess wAY t3018E, ID 83718.8650 PH. x08.343.84a3 FAX 208.343-5448 Q U O T E DATE: 3!24/08 SALESPERSON: Ted Frisbee Jr. QUOTE: 4932-09 TO: Petal RE; Meridian City Hall ATT: Tom Coughlin We are please to quote PR 1 for the subJeot p rojeoi~ Plead s~ attached back up far a detailed desa~ption of the quote. Labor - $1,697.00 Material- $850.00 Equipment x,187.00 Peitait- $ l OS.QO Prom S24Z.00 Sales Tax- 5166.00 Bond- 8108.00 Tot81- $5,351.00 ~~~~ ,.. ~ ~ ~7 ~ ~ ; ~ ~ f,c ' I ~f- ~ ! r ~. ~'y ~ it ~~(~ 9 ~ ~~ ~~ i ~ e ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~~ ~ ~ i ~ 3 1 ~ I~ t ' 3 _. }t~ i t f I i s s 1 2 ~. i' T y ~( ~ ~ 1 1t ,f i~ ~., 1. ~ ~ ( ~ ~ z ~ e 1 t ~ ~ g ~~ ' t ~ d P N -~- ~ ~ ~ p ) I ~, r . . EE 1 I ? _ ~ ~ ~ 1 11f ~ i n ~ ~ ' is ~ k~~ F ; ~ ~ ~ X ~~~~ ~~. ~'~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ 6 ##}} ~. LAS I ~t ,.G' ~ `Y ~. 3 ~ ~ ~~3~k a ~, ~ ~. ~= DATE ~./f ,mot ..". .... r. • •..• -. vv .-. ~~ .,ter,.. r,• • .. r..-.... r..w QRANO TOTALS SUMMARY DIREGT OVgRMGAp MARKUP TOTAL xTEM 4TY COST ~ Percent Amount W'Ith OVMo LA6CR 34 hrs 1.843 l0 S 164 1.897 Ot,1CTWflRK MATERIALS 634 1 be 772 10 !G 77 880 MVAC EC7U2PMENT B pG6 1.988 30 7K 199 2, iB7 SUB CONTRACTORS 0---- 0 b X 0 O Totals 4,303 l0 &; a30 a.733 SPECIAL COSTS 106 S 4.638 PROFIT S S 242 SALES TALC 168 ~ 6.246 PERFORMANCF_ k~OND 2 fli log Total ~- ----6.353 SPECiAI. CONDITIONS 0 arena Total ~ wFa.353 MARKUPS AND FACTORS OVERHEAQ MARKUPS ON, Shop Labor._....... CAf)..._. 10_00 Fia1d Lebor._....... tR~__... 10.00 Ouatwark Ma'aerials.. t.9r)..... 10.00 HVAC @quipment._.... C7K)..... 10.00 Sub ConZreators..._. CAf)..... 8.00 PROFIT MARKUP.. .........- .. ...... .. ... CS7..... b,00 COST FACTORS. Mated a1 PrYae increase.... Cat)_..._ 0.00 BaBeQ on Arnounr.........,.._ CS)...,, 4.00 Walla incr®aaes Shop Houra. ........ 0.00 RatB.. .... CS)..... 0.00 F1e1d Hours. . .... ... 0,00 Rate........ CS)..... O.QO Overtime 5nop Hours....... .... 0.00 Rate.. .......... CS)..... 0.00 Field Hours...._. ..... O.oO Rate .............. CS)..... 0.00 SPECIAL COSTS, Travol Cbs'GS .. ........... CS)..... 0.00 Room ®nd 8oard_...,....... CS)..... 0.00 P6rrt11L.. ... ___. Ca).. .. 106.00 Special ContinBencios..... CS),,.,. p.OD PerTOrrnanae Bond.......... CS)..... 2.00 F;ELD LAB[)R RATE ON HVAC EOPT..........,. C6~._.__ dB_00 SALES TAX. Ductwork Meterisl3........ ..- CX>.. .. 6.00 HVAC EQUlpmerit........ - • - - - ... CAi') ..... 6.00 Sub Contractors....,........ _ (St~...._ 0.00 Job: TJ6308 03-24-2006 ~ g r ~ ~ e, t ;.' t ~ 44 ~ ~ r i { t, ~ ? P ~. . t ' ~. ~ ~.: ~ ~ k , r 5 § ~ ~ { k _ i 5, F ~ ~: i ~ ~ ~ i y~' ~ ~ ~ li f t ~ S ~ i y ~_ i~ f ~ _ I ~ i. ., ~ S F ~~~ F~~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ Y ~ 1~.t~k ' {1 ~ ~ ~~ S ~ ~ t ~ f 1' y 1 ~ 1 S ~~, ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ I ~ ~ s t ' { t ~ , ~ e ', ~ ~ ~ ~ e t ~- F i ~. ~, yi, ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~. ~1 ~ - .~. ~ ~ ' t a r: ~ Val/GY(LVVU IO.LI IAR LV VV7VVLV~ IIVVVVII If1Y111V1111114 ~ ~vv7l vV.s Job: T.7S309 Q3-24-2008 MA.70R EQUIF~MENT pUOTA,TiONS Fi®1d Lebor quotetlon Q'ey Description & S1x® vendor Hours Amount ~ 1 FIRE SMOKE DAMPER TAP O 1.b63 1 FLOOR GRILLE S l80 1 EXHAUST GRILLE •• 9, 80 2 RETURN AIR ©RILLES 2 yzg TOtels B 6 S 1,998 SUB CONTRACTOR QUOTATIONS CUOT,8t1 pn Qt_v Description Vendor Amount s Tetela: 0 S O SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND ADD 8/ DEDUCTS De8crlpCion No. Haura Retk* S AmeunL ~ ---- ----------------._----------------------------------------a------------- Tote'1 S s 0 g ii i' " r ~ ~ ~; • ~ ~~ ' R. ; ; ¢ , , ~~ p ~ i; ,_ ~~ j; ~ ~ ,, 3~ l ~ ~`~ ( ~ ~`~~ ~ '~ ~~ ~ ~~ 1 -s' ~~ RA r ~ e k ~ ~~ #i r .z ~ ~ ~ ~" ~~~ ~i~ I6 k ~ ~t ~, ~~ i {~ r i ~ ~~~ e ~, . ~ -~ f ~5 1 ~5~~ r ~ e~ ~ i 1~ ~ { I ~ s ~ if ; Q Y~, ~ ~ s .; ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~a < j..1 ~ ~. i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1, .~. it ~ ~;• ~~ Z. S ~ ~ t,~ ` t ~ ~~~ ~ ~ a i-' ~4 ~i~ ! ' ~ ~~ ~; ~ ~ r~ ` r 'x , N ~~~ ~ ~ 'j i~ 3 ,~ { ~ ~ ~ jf '~ ! Broadcast Report `~ ~ Date/Time 06-13-2008 LocaIID 1 2088884218 Loca!!D 2 02:30:22 p.m. Transmit Header Text City of Meridian Idaho Local Name 1 Llne 1 Local Name 2 Line 2 No. 008 Job 180 Remote Station 208 888 2682 Start Time 02:13:33 p.m.06-13-2008 Duration 00:00:11 Pages 111 Line 1 Mode EC Job Type HS Results CP33600 009 180 208 387 6393 02:13:33 p.m.06-13-2008 00:00:25 1/1 1 EC HS CP14400 010 180 287 7909 02:13:33 p.m.06-13-2008 00:00:11 111 1 EC HS CP31200 011 180 8885052 02:13:33 p.m.06-13-2008 00:00:11 111 1 EC HS CP31200 012 180 8881983 02:13:33 p.m.06-13-2008 00:00:12 111 1 EC HS CP28800 013 180 2083776449 02:13:33 p.m.06-13-2008 00:00:25 1/1 1 EC HS CP14400 014 180 4679562 02:13:33 p.m.06-13-2008 00:00:11 1!1 1 EC HS CP28800 015 180 8886700 02:13:33 p.m.06-13-2008 00:00:00 0/1 1 -- HS FA 016 180 8884022 02:13:33 p.m.06-13-2008 00:00:41 111 1 EC HS CP14400 017 180 3886924 02:13:33 p.m.06-13-2008 00:00:25 111 1 EC HS CP14400 018 180 8847159 02:13:33 p.m.06-13-2008 00:00:12 111 1 EC HS CP28800 019 180 8840744 02:13:33 p.m.06-13-2008 00:00:12 111 1 EC HS CP26400 Abbreviations: HS: Host send PL: Polled local MP: Mailbox print TU: Terminated by user HR: Host receive PR: Polled remote CP: Completed TS: Terminated by system G3: Group3 WS: Waiting send MS: Mailbox save FA: Fall RP: Report EC: Error Correll .lob : 'r~esoa 03-24.2go6 9YSTffM TOTALS MA'T~FdIAL5 ---------~ ..... ........... LABDR ------5h9OP---- -----FIELD---- ---~DRAWINp-- ---SHIPPING- IN9UL LDs Cysts Hrs S Goat Nrs ffi Gost Hrs S CcfB'C HPS ! Co+~t Subs 4ALYANitED ----- ------------- - ------~ A 634 %72 ib 694 13 S60 0 7 1 31 p SPIRAL FIBHRGLASS INDUSTRIAL TOTALS 534 772 lb 694 33 S80 O 7 1 31 p ~~ ~1 f ~; T y}fj}7i 5r- ~. F 3' ,; iF i. L ~ ! ~~~ ~ ~: . i~' ~ e ~~ ~ 3 S i o ~ ;' 4' ' ~ ~ hY ~ ~ $ ~ '~ F -' ~ + i ~ ~! i ~ ~ ~ i' ~ z , . . 7 i f ~~ {{ "' i 3 7~~. ~ a~°t 1 ~ .~ I ~ S ~, ~ 1 i _ ~ ~ '~. ~ ~,. ~ ~ ~: ~ .~ ~' t, ~ ~ J'. ~ ' ~~ `~E ~ ~ } ~ . ~ ~ ~~~ 7~ i; ,-~( t~ {~i t ~ ~ ~ ~ i i1[i i ~ ~ '' , i • ~. ~ ~ ; _ ~ t 1 f ~ 3 d . " 3i ~ , 2 i r ? , Y ~L 1CG ~ °~ r ~' #~ ' I' ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ E j (~ ly ~)~( ~ I , 4 ~ , + t ~t ~ ( t ~~ } t ~ ] IC ~ S ~ ~ j ~' 'ti ~~ E~ ~~ ,i .. 3i ~ i i 1 2 ~ ~~ ` ii #~ ;` `( ' >' i _ n, ,. !y3`{} P ' ~ I: ~ [ t j 1 t ' ` t ; t ii ~, ~ `- i ~ t: ~ t i ~ z ;~ ~ ! ~,~~~ f H08SON FABRICATING, INC. 842$ BUSINESS WAY ~ ~ j ~ ~ BOISEP~ 28.'37~~~~ ` FAX Z08.343u446 FABRtCAIlNq WC ~ ~,,~ Q U O T E DATE: 4123/08 SALESPERSON: Ted Frisbee Jr. QUOTE: 4932-12 TO: Petra RE: Meridian City Hali ATT: Tom Coughlin We are please ~ quote PR 2 for the subject project. Please see attached bads up for a detaaed description of the quote. Sub Contr~tor - SZ7,056.00 OFi&P- $1,353.00 Bond- $4Z6.Q0 Total- DATE 58,835.00 ;; F - s~ ~ g ~ ,~ ~ t t 3 ~-` i ~ 1 ~ E ' j~ ~ ~ f ~ S I { f~ } :, i ~ }~ i'% l ~ ' ~'_ 4 ~ jj ~ f I f ~ ~} ` { ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ F h I i r e t~ L ~t i _ ~;.i 1 ± ~ f ~ 1 ~~ ~~, ~ ,- i ~ `3 ~_ ~ # ~ ) ~ .,iti~ ~ ~ .- ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ys ~ ~_ ~ ~; n ~ 3 ~~ ~ 4. ~ e 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ +i ~ {}};_i ~ ~R, t., ~ !'~ ~ I ~ li. t ., ~. api.~ 'E ;~ ~' i. i' i, ~ S2 !' 7 , i. '~ 'S~amas Q U O T A T I O N 2230 South Cok Road, Snite 130, Boise, Idaho 83709 ~ TeL: (208} 3?.3-8088 Fax: (208} 323-8388 Quotation No: 8RLr-001 Date: Apri122, 2008 TO: Ted Frisbee RE: Meridian City Hall Hobson Fabricating PR-02 C02 Monitoring -LEER 6428 Business way Boix, Idaho 83716 We propose to furnish and tnatall a cxm~plete TAC DDC system in accordance with Proposal Request 002 dated Apri13, 2008 as prepared by Engineering Inc., Engineers and LCA architects. ~P sum 756.00 Under this proposal we will select the groper controls and deliver to the ,jobsite, furnish and install all necessary conduit and wire, Program the system, generate all nece~y graphics, train the operating personnel and guarantee the system and its operation for a period of one year. The above price includes 28 wall mowed CC2 sensors, controllers and necessary power supplies. The above price does not include conduit and bcek boxes for wall rough ins. This work will ba by ~e electrical contractor. This quote assumes: • No Hazardous Materials (i.e. asbestos removal). ^ All labor will be performed during normal working hours. ^ Normal access (i.e. no gowning for clean room, available parking, etc.) No permits, bonding, or special insurance requirements. ^ No patching or painting. d f '. t ~ 3 tai 1~~ ~!~~ i 4~. t:' i Tom Coughlin Page 1 of 1 From: Ted Frisbee JR [tedjr(cDhobsonfab.com] . Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:44 PM To: Tom Coughlin Subject: FW: Meridian City Hall C02 Detectors Breakdown Attachments: Breakdown.doc Tom, Attached is the breakdown for Yamas on PR 2. Ted Frisbee Jr. (208) 343-5423- Phone . (208) 343-5446- Fax (208) 484-9896- Cell From: Bill Hawker [maiito:bhawkes@yamasidaho.com] Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:11 AM To: Ted Frisbee Cc: Rich Ubengood ;subject: Meridian City Hall C02 Detectors Breakdown Ted, Attached is a pric8 breakdown for PR-02 C02 Monitoring-LEED. Bill Hawker Estimator Yamas Controls 2230 South Cole Road, Suite 130 Boise, Idaho 83709 (208)323-8088 Fax (208)323-8388 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 I Virus Database: 269.23.2/1389 -Release Date: 4/21/2008 8:34 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 /Virus Database: 26923.2/1389 -Release Date: 4/21128 8:34 AM 4/26/2008 E ~ ~ ; ~-~ ~ r, ~~~~ s; 4 ~ `` ~ } ~. 2: ~ C a: Y i ~` ~~ ~ { 5 p i !; 1. t f ~ c 1~~La. '~~. ~.1 r ~~ ti.~ . ,~^•~'. r -. ~ ~ ~ •. a"~~~1 E ~ f S ~ ;. i ~ j _ [ ~" t ~ ~ 7 i ~' ~ ~ ~ i ~, : ~~.. r ~ ~ 2: ~ ~ '~ ~9; ), - ~ tt d- ~ t S ~ ~ ~ '~~ t )S: rF lil i t f ~ t~ ` ~ I f 'yy {p ~ ~ ~ i ~, t 't. ~ ~. P t ~ f ~ ~ }, . ~ ~ kE ~ L ~ i o ~ ! I. ! }. ( - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I 4 ~ ~ ~ i E ' { .r t 1 ; ~. ~ ~~ ~ Y S ~; A Y f I ~ ~ f 1 ~ '~ 9 ~ ~ f ~`~ ~ > ` ~ ~{ i ~`~ t7 ~ ~' j 4 a. ~ I ~ ~ ~ f ~ ¢ ` ~. ~ ~.F ~ % ~ ~ A ~ 111 i F ~~ t u ~ , - ~i _ p ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~x ~ ~' ~ ;:, ~ a ~ ~t. ~ f i e ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ t ~; 9 f , ~ i ' ' }` i' ~ 1 S ) at ~~ '.'ti i~ : ~ ~ - e. S ''{'~'~ ~ Yarr~ ~ 1 ' f 223U South Cod Rcred, Suite 1~ ~ ~ 13°Lse, Id~ro 83709 $itildittR ingetnar~j jnr better hr~ti-irres.4 Tel: 208.323.8088 Fax: 208.323.83 April 23, 2008 Teel Frisbee Jr Hobson Fabricating 6428 Business Way Boise, Idaho 83716 Re: Meridian City Hall PR-02 CO2 Monitoring - LEED Dear Ted, Our price of $27,056.00 for this add can be broken down as follows: 1 > Material A. 28 Each TR9290 CO2 detectors @ $213.00 B. 6 Each power supply panels @ $204.00 C. 5 Each MNB-300 controllers @ $494.00 D. 1680 Feet plenum wire 2 pair Level 4 + 1 pair 16/2 @ $.47/Foot Subtotal + 6% Sales Tax Total Material 2. Labor A. Program Management 17 Hours @ $7038 B. Engineering 10 Hours @ $7433 C. Programming 24 Hours @ $7l .36 D. Technician 32 Houus @ $54.75 E. Installation 163 Hours @ $49.80 3. Total Material & Labor Total Labor + 10% Overhead & Profit Total Price If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, $l8e Kaatr~os Bill Hawkes Estimator $5,964.00 $1,224.00 $2,470.00 .60 $10,447.60 626.86 $l 1,074.46 $1,196.46 $74330 $1,712.64 $1,752.00 8117.40 $13,521.80 $24,596.26 2 459.63 $27,055.89 p1. + ~ 1 ~ r. ~. ~~ ~ ~: ~6 + p ti ~~ i~ ~ '!; t. ~ ~ $ Qi` ~ l t ~p f ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~, i ~ ~ ~ > s ~ ~~ ~' < c c t rr ~ 4 # ~ } E t .- ~ ~~ ~ :~ {{ ~ ~ ~. ~ f f iii ~ , F t ~~ ~~ l' -.. 1 ~ ~ t ~ { :. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q ~,. E ; ~; s ~ t ~ t ~~ ~ ~ T ~ ~` ~ r . i i k ~ ~ , f 4 , a .. 7 ~ u j [ , +~' ~ ~. 1 r , ! }~, ~r i ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~, ~~ i , ` ~ ~ ~ q ~ Y ~~ i +~ ~ 1 f ~ S . ~ ~ ~ gy ; ~ °. r i ~ . i ~ f. ~ t ~ ' ~ ~ p pp ,~ ~ 0 FABBICA1GVt~ ~i1C 0 HOBSON FABRICATING, INC. 6428 BUSINESS WAY BOISE, ID 83776.55x0 PH. 208.343.5423 FAX 2iDB-343.5448 y~ ~ "' QUOTE ~~~"~ DATE: 5!2/08 SALESPERSON: Ted Frisbee Jr. QUOTE: 4932-13 TO: Petra RE: Meridian City Hall ATT: Tom Coughlin We are please to quote ASI 81 for the subject project Please see attached bade up for a detailed descrip8on of die quote. ~Or - $1,542.00 ~~" $206.00 Equipment $3,814.00 P~mtt $124.00 ~~ $284.00 ~~ Tom- $219.00 Bond $124.00 Total- $6,313.00 ~^ \ ._ ~: ` ' 'j , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ f{f'''; l{ ,~ ~ j` ~ 3: ~ ~ ~ , F ~ ,~ Mfr ~ t' i ~ , ~~ ,~ e ~ ~ )~ ;:~ +t ~ t~ ~ ~ t, ~ 4 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' {~ ~ ~ k '` ` ~ ' i /1 1~" t d ,M ' t .~ t `~`i 1i Z ~ ~ ? ~ { 1 1 ~ Y !1 x? b s ~' ~' ,~ < < , ll [ ! ° e7 ~ ~ ~; ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1. 4 #t ~ ~ 4 i }:C ~ / r ;.~ .~ ~s ~ - t~ ;V_ t ~~ ~ i'~ ~' ~ _ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f~ ti ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~. , ~ .; ~ p, ; . } ~ k 5W ~ ~ ~{ ~ I S < ~ Y 6 z 1 - < i ti 1 ~t GRAND TOTALS SINNMARY DIRECT OVERIiEAO MARKUP TOTAL ITEM QTY COST S Percent Amount With OVHD LABOR 31 hrs 1.402 10 X 140 1,642 OUCTiJORK MATERIALS 114 lbs 187 10 % I9 206 ~ HVAC EQUIPMENT 10 pcs 3,467 10 % 347 3.814 SUB CONTRACTORS 0---- O b % O O Totals 6.056 10 % 606 6.662 SPECIAL COSTS ` 124 S 5.686 PROFIT 6 % 284 SALES TAX 219 S 6.189 PERFORMANCE BOND 2 X .. 124 ---- Total 5 6.313 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 0 - Grand Total S 6.313 MARKUPS AND FACTORS OVERHEAD MARKUPS ON. Shop Labor__....... C%)..... 10.00 Field Labor._..._... C%)_.... 10_00 Ductwork Materials.. (%)..... 10.00 HVAC Ecluipment...... t%)..... 10.00 Sub Contractors..... (%)..... 6.00 PROFIT MARKUP .......... ................ C%)..... b.00 COST FACTORS. Material Price Increase._.. C%)..... 0.00 Based on Amount............ (s)..... 0.00 Wage Increases Shop Hours. ........ 0.00 Rate... .... CS)._... 0.00 Field Hours. ........ 0.00 Rate........ CS)._... 0.00 Overtime Shop HOUrs ........ ........ 0.00 Rate .............. CS)..... 0.00 Field Hours ....... .. ..... 0.00 Rate .............. CS)..... 0.00 SPECIAL COSTS. Travel Costs .............. (S)..... 0.00 Room and Board.... ._._.. (S)..... 0.00 Permit .................... CS)..... 124.00 Special Continpencies...,_ CS)..... 0_00 PerYOrmance Bond.......... (X)..... 2.00 FIELD LABOR RATE ON HVAC EOPT............ CS).._.. 46_00 SALES TAX. Ductwork Materials._.......... C%)..... 6.00 HVAC Equipment ................ C%)_.... 6.00 Sub Contractors ............... ----------------------------------------- f%)..... ---------- 0.00 ----------------------------- Job: TJ9008 06-02-2008 ~ ~ o Job: TJ9008 Q5-02-2008 MAJOR EQUIPMENT QUOTATIONS Field Labor Quotation qty Description 8. size Vendor -`---- -- ----Hours --- ---- ------ Amount-a_-- -- ---- ----------------- g ------------------------- FLOOR GRILLES T~ ---- 12 3,467 1 LOT OF CONTROLS TAP O O 3 RA GRILLES TAP 0 -- O ----------------iO--- ------------- Totals ----- ---------------- ------------------------- ---------------- ----------12----5- ---3---?-------- SUB CONTRACTOR QUOTATIONS quotation qty Description vendor Amount S ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- TO't073: ~ ~ $ ~ SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND ADD & DEDUCTS Description No. Hours Rate S Amount S --------'---------------------------"--0-------"----------' Totals S O _.. ~- _ ~ i qq ~ j~ ^~f~ . ' 1 ~ ~ ~ r a i ~ ~ y T ~ ' 7 ' ~ ' ~ ` ~; ~ d ~ ~ i ~1F~~ F Y ~ ~t Jt f f1 `. i ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ y ~„ ~ J . k 1 3 d i ! ~ . ~_ ~ i - t ~ ' ~ ~ ~ 1 t ~ ~ ~ ~~ p ~ ~ ; x ~ :~ ~ ,t ~ , ~ ~ ~ z~ i t F. S p~ ~ i ~ fi y~ ~ ° 1~ r ~'i f i; ~ i ~ ~ ~' i. I ~. 3 t ,~ ~ e' ~ ~ S; * ~ , ~ ' f ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ f {; ~ ~ ~ j ? .}t j ~ ~~ ~ 1 f ~ °_ i i; i r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ yq s '`4 : ~ p ~ x~ 44< - 1 ]k j ~ < i i ~~ ' ; ~ ~: t I ; ~ LP F ~ , ~ E , r'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ) ~ t l ~' ', b. p t 'k 1~ C Job: TJ9008 os-oz-coos SYSTEM TOTALS MATERIALS --------------- ----------- L-ABOR -___'------ ------------- ------SHOP---- -----FIELD---- ----DRAWING-- ---SHIPPING- INSUL Lbs Costs Hrs ~ Cost Hrs S Cost Hrs S Cost Hrs S Cost Subs GALVANIZED A 114 1B7 5 234 13 6B9 O 20 O 6 10 SPIRAL FIBERGLASS INDUSTRIAL TOTALS 114 1B7 5 234 13 b89 O 20 O 6 10 Tom Couohiin From: Ted Frisbee JR [tedjr@hobsonfab.com] Sent: Friday, May 02, 2408 8:16 AM To: Tom Coughlin Subject: Meridian Ciiy Ha{{ ASI 81 . Attachments: Documeni~pdf Document.pdf (63 KB) Tom, Attached is the quote for ASI 81, more to follow. Ted Frisbee Jr. {208) 343-5423- Phone (208) 343-5446- Fax (208) 484-9896- Cell -----Original Message----- ' From: Hobson Fabricating Inc. [mailto:Engineering@hobsQnfab.com] Sent: Friday, May 02, ZOOS 2:01 AM To: TEDJR@HOBSONFAB.COM Subject: Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.7/1411 - Release Date: 5/2/2006 8:02 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.7/1411 - Release Date: 5/2/2008 8:02 AM i ,: 4 k., ~~ ~{; Tom Coughlin ragC i ui i Frotn: John Buss (john@bussmechanical.com] ~ ~ ~'' S®nt: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 10:25 AM To: Tom Coughlin t~,~,,,,"~ Subject: Meridian City Hall ~~ /~ ~ -Z Tom, as far as the plumbing there is a no cast change for ASI #81 Thank you, John /" 4/30/2008 ~ . n y4~ ~ . ~ e ~' 1 f - ~ 3 ~r~ ,~ l a. }j` ~ ~i' c - ~r , ~;, ti f ~~' ~~ ~ ~ 3 4' f i ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ t g ~ ' ~l i ~ „~ ' ~ 1 .~ 7p ~ ] y ~ '' r i ' .i ~ ~ f ~ tk, e'_ ~ ~ ( ~ Yr ~ ~ 5yy5 ' 3 S i ~ ~ ~ r ~ ' {s{ ' ~ ~ ~ j ` RR rr . .. F ~ ' ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ p ;~. ~ ii i~ ~ j ~ ; ~ ~ ~ t: 1 i ~~ ~ ~ 1~ { F, 5 ~_. ~, f ~ ~ S e. yy ££ E j { ~ ~ r~ u June 13, 2008 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Finance Department ITEM NO. 6-8-6 REQUEST Approve Bid Package and Agmt of City Hall Phase V with AA.R. Preist dba Advanced Sign & Design for $42,954.29 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: _ Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ' : "4' i i. i ~ ~~ ~ ~ E ~ n R ~ !~ ~;' ~ dt t ~ ~ ~ 1 ;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~; I ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ii i ' E i ~ 1 ~ ~; ~ i ~ t ~ ~ I' ~ 31 ~ k ~ 1 c ~ : a ~ ., '~ i. ~ ? ~ ~ j t ~ f~ j.- 1 ~ p I r p~, ~ ~' ~ i ' !; f ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p f j ~ ~ f ~ i ~ ~ c .j ~ ( ~ . ~ 1' ~ ! z. ~ ~ . ~ 4 1 ~ ~ ~~~ i ~ ~ 1 I i r~ `i ii ~ li. 1 v _..I ~ i I ~i ~, ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ s ~ ' ~ li ; ~ ,~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ I: Ir i; = ; ~ ~ r 4 ~ ~ I~~ ~ I '~ ; ~ k ~ ;; I ~ ~ j f j COMMENTS See aflached I~ LJ ~Vlemo -~ ~a p To: Jaycee Holman, City Clerk From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Agent CC: Tara Green, Stacy IUlchenmann, Council, Tom Coughlin ®ate: 6/13/08 Re: June 17 City Council Department Report ~U~ ~ ~ ~~o ~g~~ ~~ ~~~~a~ ~zt~ ~1~~~ (J~ce The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the June 17 City Council Agenda under Department Report. Approval of Award of City Hall Phase V Bid Package #1 Interior Signage in the Amount of $42,954.29 to M.R. Preist. Inc. dba Advanced Sign & Design. All work under this Bid and subsequent contract will be completed pursuant to the AIA 101 CM & AIA 201 CM Construction Agreements mod~ed by Ted Baird for the City Hall Project. Recommended Council Action: Approval of bid packages and subsequent agreements, authorize the Purchasing Agent to issue Conditional Notices of Award and authorize the Mayor to sign all agreements and City Clerk to attest. Thank you for your consideration. • Page 1 t ~~ ' i i~ a ` t ~t ~ ~{ F ' .1 k ' t y I ; i ~ J {~ pp pp ~ ~ : { i ~I ~ : s s ~ ~ F € ~ ~! ? ~~ ~'' G e ~ 9 t , f t : ~ ~ E . r ~` ~ ~ ~~ , ~ t ` ~ ~ ~; , ;~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ 4- ~ ~ 3 ~ z , ~ ~ ~, ~ "~-~ ~ , _ ~ jf i, a~ ~ !. ~ ~ t j r, i i #~ ~-~ fi II i ~~ t,L ~~~ ~~ ~ ~`' ' 1 ~ li .i i ~~ ,~ ~ ~~ i;i ~l~~r < } If } `~ ~~ i. ~' $ ~ ,~ ai ~f l ii_ ~ } ~ ~ ~; E 1 ~ ~~ fi' ( j' r s. 4_ ~ t , _ ~ ~ i i _. - t i ~; ° ~~ ~ i ~ ~ I ' s' { ' 4 r 1 ~' f. ;. f:. I f 5 ; '; ~ - i } P i ~ [ {' ~ I ~. i;, ~ '" ~: ~, tr • • BID PACKAGE DESCRIPTION & BID FORM MERIDIAN CITY HALL PHASE V -Interior Signage Package Bid Package 1 Interior Signage Bid Requirements: Provide all labor, material, tools, and equipment to complete the interior signage as noted on the drawings per the following: Division I -General Requirements Section 10400 -Special Signage, Convex-Curved Signage System Section 07920 -Joint Sealants This bid package specifically includes: • Furnish and install wall mounted frames, projected wall bracket mounted frames, directory fratnes, and suspended frames. • Provide all glues, adhesives, sealants, and fasteners for proper installation of signage. • Provide message list, typestyles, graphic elements, including tactile characters and Braille, and layout for each sign. • Provide clean up for all sign installation activities. ADDENDUM 1 dated 5!1212008 BASE BID -Interior Signage $42,954.29 Having cazefully examined the Invitation to Bid, Instructions to Bidders, Bid Proposal Form, Agreement Forms, contract drawings, existing site and all conditions affecting the work, the undersigned agrees to furnish all labor, materials, etc., necessary to perform the work as shown on the drawings and listed on the Bid Items, in accordance with the Bid Documents. The undersigned understands that Petra, Incorporated, the Owner, and the Architect reserve the right to reject any and/or all bids. Final award. is subject to approval by the Owner. _ M.R Priest, Inc. dba Advanced Sign & Design Company Name Y Renette P. Gaumer Printed or Typed Name President Title May 28, 2008 _ Date (Seal if bid i~c by C~orporatiun) 511 W. Highland St., Boise, 83706 Address 208-345-8682 Phone Number 208-345-0015 Fax Number 10679-B-4(02820, 02318, 06200, 02890, 02761) Public YYorks License Number RCE-1230 11/17108 ID Contractors Reg Number Exp. Date i - ; ~ i ~~ ~ j !' ~ ~ ~~ ~ F ~ g; ~ r I 7jJ1 ~ t S ~ i ~ ~ ~~ ,i ~ ~ ~ j i :' 1 ~ , ~ ~: ~ t ' ~ ~ s ~ ; ,, , ~: ~ ~ S ~ i I I ~ ; et i ~'S ~ $ I~ i ~ S f € ~. i '~ ~ - ~ ~~ i ~. : ~ a~_ ~ . ~ ~ f. ~ i ~~ i~ i , ~: -~. ~ ~ ~ ~ 3, , s' i i ~~ .~ ~ ~'' ~ i ~ i,. t0 {~ ~ i ,~ ~ ~ i , E, ~ I ~ i ~, 1 ) . ; ~ g. ~ ~ d ~ ~ k ~ t1 ~ ~ _ i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' f~ t FI 1 p ~ ( ~ q ,~ i THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS AIA Document A310 Bid Bond 2566 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we M.R PRIEST, INC., DBA ADVANCED SIGN & DESIGN 511 W HIGHLAND, BOISE, ID 83706 as Principal, hereinafter called the Principal, and INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FIVE CENTERPOINTE, SUTTE 530, LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 a corporation duty organized under the laws of the State of CALIFORNIA as Surety, hereinafter called the Surety, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E IDAHO AVE., MERIDIAN, ID 83642 as Obligee, hereinafter called the Obligee, in the sum of FIVE PERCENT (5%) OF AMOUNT BID • Dollars ($ 5% for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, the said Principal and the said Surety, bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the Principal has submitted a bid for MERIDIAN CITY HALL PHASE V -INTERIOR SIGN PACKAGE NOW, THEREFORE, if the Obligee shall accept the bid of the Principal and the Principal shall enter into a Contract with the Obligee in acxordance with the terms of such bid, and give such bond or bonds as may be specified in the bidding or Contract Documents with good and sufficient surety for the faithful performance of such Contract and for the prompt payment of labor and material furnished in the prosecution thereof, or in the event of the failure of the Principal to enter such Contract and give such bond or bonds, if the Principal shall pay to the Obligee the difference not to exceed the penalty hereof between the amount specified in said bid and such larger amount for which the Obligee may in good faith contract with another party to pertorm the Wark covered by said bid, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Signed and sealed this 28 day of MAY 20 08 M.R PRIEST, INC., DBA * ADVANCED SIGN & DESIGN ~ (~cipal) ~ q • ~ ~' (Title INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA (s~ JENAE SEXT M~+~) KA L A ICHTER 8) ATTORNEY IN 1=AC1- AIA DOCUMENT A310 -BID BOND -AIA 0 -FEBRUARY 1870 ED - THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 N.Y. AVE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D. C. 20008 ® P7~nted on Reryded Paper 993 j ~` t! 1 s 7i ~' 1 • • POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR DEVELOPERS SURETYAND INDEMNITY COMPANY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA PO Box 19725, IRVINE, CA 92823 (949) 2833300 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that as except as expressly gmdeed, DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, do each, hereby make, constlbrte and appoint ***Karyl A. Richter, ]enae M. Sexton, jointly or severally*** as then true and A>[omey(s)-in-Fact to make, execute, depv®r and aclmowNdge, fir and ~ beha0 of said corporatons. ~ suretles, bonds, undeRakings a~ contracts of surety- ship 9Mn9 and 9~n9 u~ said Atmmey(s)-br-Ford full parer and authority to do and to perform ev~y ad necessary, requisfte or proper to ba done in connection th~~rith as Leh of ~Id tmtporations could do, but reserving to each of said corporations fu0 power of substibrtitiar and revocation, and all of the acts of mid Attanay(srin-Fact, pursuant to tt~e presents, are hereby ragfled and conflrmed. This Power of Attomey is granted and is signed by faatmge wrier and by authority of the following resolutions adopted by the respective Board of Direetors of DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and INDEMNITY COA4~ANY OF CALIFORNIA, effective as of January 1st, 2008. RESOLVED. that the chairman of the Board, the Presiderd and any Vim President of the txtryoretion be, and that each of them hereby i$, authorized to execute Palos of A@omey, quagfybrg the attorney(s) named in the Powers of Attorney th execute, on behalf of the ~rporetiorrs, bands, undertakhrgs and crontrects of suretyship; and that the Secretary or arq Assistand Secetary of the caporetions be, and eadr of them hereby is, authorized th attest the exed~ of arhr such Paver of Attorney; RESOLVED, FURTHER, Drat the signatures of such officers may be atfsced to arty such Power ofAttomey or to arty rs3rdflcate reteting titereto by facsimge, and any such Paver of Attorney or c;artlflcate bearing such faGalmge signatures shag be vatkl and binding upon the corporations xfien afl Mixed and in the future with respect ro any bond, undeAaldng or contract of suretyship to which n Ls attached. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and INDEMNITf COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA have severally caused these preserds to ire signed by their respectlve Vice Pr~ideM and atiasthd by their respective Asst Secretary this January 1st, 2006. ~ ,•. O OM O O Stephen T. Pate, Senior Vice Presidan F s : pQ • pp og~ 4p'it 24rt~` *~~L T G PO ' h~ 60P 9qr C9 ~ ~, ~ . £.c~ ~ 2 OCT.S ~ ~`' Charles L Day. Assistant Secretary o~ 1938 ~c~ , ~ L, r a!~ ° ' w 1887 p ~, `~, ~ q ••.~dO.!OWP,•• *~~~ (/FOAL 3t~9 Of CaCdom+e a~„~N~~~„o° t'ioUllly Of Qrenge On Januarc 1st, 2008 before me, Chrtstooher J Roach Notary Pubec Date Hoe Insert Name and Title ~ the 0(Acer - personagy appeared Stephan T. Pete and Charles L Day Nerrre(sjofSlgner(s) CHt~&TO~ J. R~It~! - COMM. ~ 1745938 NfRAR1f A OMNQE CQtA~liY roornte. 19.2011 Place Notary Seal Above who proved to rrre on the basis of satisfactory evidence to De the person(s) whose name(s) islare subscribed to the wi7dn Instrument acrd ecknovAedged to rrre that hefshetthey exeaited the awns in ldsfherRheb authorized capacgyp~s), and that by hlalhedthetr signature(s) on the irmtrumerd the ~raon{s), or the entity upon behalf of which ga person(s) acted, exearted the Instrument 1 certlty under PENALTY OF PERJURY ands the laws of the Stath of CaBfomia that the totegolrg Paragraph is true and correct WITNESS my hand and seal. Signature ~~~ ~~--~ Ch J. Roach CERTIFICATE The undersigned, as Assistant Secretary, of DEVELOPERS SURETYAND INDEMNITY COMPANY and MDEMNfrY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, does hereby rsrtitj+ that the foregoutg Power of Attorney remains M fug force and has rrot been revoked, and furthermore. that the provLglans of the resolutiorn: of the respective Boards of Director: of said corporatons set foAh br the Paver ofAttomey, era to forte as of the date of this Certificate. Th~ Certlficete is executes m the City of Irvine, CaBfomia, the 28 day of MAY .2008 ~ Albert Hfgabrand, Assistant ecretary ID-1360(Wet){Rev.07/07) • 4 June 13, 2008 Deportment Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Legal Department ITEM NO. 6-C-~ REQUEST Citizens Use Permit AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY See a#tached CITY POLICE DEPT: ~ ~ Q~ CITY FIRE DEPT: ,~ ~ fLJI~A ~~ CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Cffy of Meridian. ~, ' S ~~J j ~ x is ,_ ~~ j ~_;~ 3 ~ ~ ~~- F i r ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~' ~ ~' ,. t ,~~ ~ r 1 ~ ~ ~ . ~~ } ~ ~` ~ ~ s ~ ~ - r is ~ . py ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ { F i 0 ~1 ~~ ~ ~ l~Y ~ ' ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ 7: , ~ 6, fx a t ~ ~ if i . ~ i ~ ~ ~. i I' ! i ~ F ,~5 ~ ~ 4; ~ ~ 9 ~i) ~ ~ ' ~ ; .~ ` 1 {w ~~ r ~ [ ~ ~~ ~ i y .3 1 j ~ ~ ' . ~r If ~, i} ~, ~ 1 k i. ~ '~ ~ 3~, i" s i~ M~ t ~ t ~ ~i, t F ~ l F {S _ ~ ~., , ,$ i sl ~ ~ ~~_~ ~~ ~S ~ a y ~ l ~ ~~ I ~. } '~ ~ t t ~;e {S 4' ® o Tara Green Page 1 of 1 From: Emily Kane Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:57 PM To: Tara Green Cc: Jaycee Holman; Bill Nary Subject: Tueday Council agenda item Attachments: Citizen's Use App Authorization ~ Indemnity.pdf Tara, will you please add to the Council agenda a Legal Department report entitled °Citizen's Use Permit Application -Authorization and Indemnity Agreement with the attached document. If you have already printed the agenda, please disregard this request; Bill will just ask to have it added at the beginning of the meeting. THANK YOU! Emily Emily Kane Deputy City Attorney City of Meridian, Idaho Phone: 208-898-5506 Fax: 208-884-8723 E-mail: kanee@meridiancity.org 6/13/2008 i. f ~ ; ' ~ e-. ,~ ~ i ~ I 5 1 ~~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ . t a ~ •~ 1 r ,~a t ~ , ~ ! ~~: ~ ~ e ~ _ y ~ S ~ t ;. :' ~~ ~'~ ~ f ~' ~ ` I. 1 o a_: ...E ~ ~ '~ ~ i~ ~ > , q . f ` ~ ~ ~r ~ ~. ~. " ~ ~~ a iy, i ~ i / 3F qF y ~j `,~ " f ~~ Z ~~ k f ~ ' ~ r ~ ,~ N:~ ' , ~ r ~ ,, l ~ ~ ~ ~ # 'r: ~ s li t e, p; ~, ~ } r // t y} ~ ~j ~ 1. J ~ ~ t tl(N~ '~ ~~ ~ ; ' ~ ~ ~5 ~ 3 i .?. ' q ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~. A f ~` ~ . _ i , ~ ~ ~ i [ + ~ • • Attach additional sheets if necessary Temporary signs (by dimension} that will be installed for the use both on and o~ site: Size 1: Number of Size 1 signs: ^ On site ^ Off-site Location(s) of off site signs: Size 2: Size 3: Number of Size 2 signs: O On-site ^ Off-site Location(s) of off-site signs: Number of Size 3 signs: ^ On-site ^ Off-site Location(s) of off-site signs: Authorization and Indeimnity I, hereby agree to indemnify, save and hold harmless, and defend the City of Meridian and the Ada County Highway District from the expenses of and against any and all suits, actions, claims, and/or losses of every IQnd, nature, and description, including costs, expenses, and attorney fees that may be incurred by reason of any act, omission, neglect, or misconduct of myself, the organizers or operators of the use(s), activities, or evems described or depicted in this application and/or the supporting documents, or any participant therein. Print applicant name: Applicant Signature: , Date: I, - , hereby certify that damage to the properties, locations, and/or mutes at or ugon which the use(s), activities, or events described or depicted in this application and/or the supporting documents is not foreseeable, and that, if damaged, I alone shall incur any and all costs of restoring such groperties, locations, and/or routes to their original condition. Print applicant name: Applicant signature: Date: 33 E Idaho .Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 888-0433 Facsimile: (2Q8) 88$-4218 . website: www meridi~city.org 3 (Rev.S/30~8) t r ~ ~ ~• ~ #'~ 1~ '; ~0i + ~ ~ i" ~ _ f: ~ , ~ a ~,_ 1 r + ~ ti ~ ~ 1 ~ ~t~ i ( t° i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~` ~~ 1 ~ y ~ 1: 4 ~ S i I ~ 1 ~ ' i Sl 1 (: ~~ I ~~ ~7i ~ ( S ~ ~ S ~ f~ ~ ~~ } s ,I 1, ~j ~ i~ 1~. 1 3 ~ 1 a' ~ ~ i:r - _. ~. ~,, - ~ ~ ~ t. ~ ,. i ~ ~ 1 ~~ sf }, 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ '~ t ~ ~ i ~ ~ i~ t 7 tt ~~ ~ ~ ~ „ f ~ t n ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~~ ~ j i ¢ ~~ i j ~ i i t ~~ ~ i ~~ i ~ , ~ ~ ~ ;` 1 ~ , 11 ~ ! ~ ` ~~ I ~' + i 'i ~ t €' ~ ~ f. ~` ~ ~ ~ i Y~ ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~. t ~ Fsa ~ is ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~~I N _~~ / ~ } i '{{ ~~ ~ F -~ i ~ ~ k ~ ~ i x 1. i i~ VyII 77 `Q 4( x June 13, 2008 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Legal Department ITEM NO. 6-C-2 REQUEST Discussion on Insurance for Citizen's Use Permits AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY ~ ~ij~~J~ CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ' ~ ~' E i~ ~~I - . ~ t ~ i i F i ;~ at ~t ~ t i f ~; ~ ~ ~ ;~ ,~ ,. i ti ; .j ~ I i ? t C ~ i 4~ ,~ k` ii i i ~ ~ i _ 1 ~ ` ~ ] fi ` ~ ~ 7 u ~ ~ ~ 9 ' c e e ~ ~~ ' ~ rr ~ 7 r t~ t t I ~~ T ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ t7 ~; ' i ~ I + ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ s i ~ ~ ~. ' ' ~ } I ~ ~ ~: ~~ ~. ~f ~ }~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ f ~ ~4: ~. ,_ . 1 . f~~ '~ ~~ ~ ~.~ . ~ ~ ~ °° ~~ ~ . t ~: t a ~ ~! ~ , ) ~ ~ ~ ~ 444 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E t ~~ ~ $( c ~ r ~ 9 ~ #~" ~ ~ : t .Y' ~ d it 1 }. _ June 13, 2008 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Legal Department ITEM NO. b-C-3 REQUEST Discussion on Citizen's Use Permit Application for City of Meridian Fun Day on the 4th AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY ~1 ~ ~ S SAC CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: _ Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. June 13, 2008 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Legal Department ITEM NO. 6-C-4 REQUEST Traffic Safety Committee Report AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: i ~~ ~~~~~ CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. {~ ' F F f ~ ; t j ~i ~~' +~ ! ~~ ~t ° ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ r~.~ ~ ~1 , ~ ~, d 1 ~ jtjt~ 7 r t t ~ ~ i ~ 3 - { ; ; i ~~ f I 9 ~ ~ f 4 J ~ . ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ., ~ f ~ i ~~S t, ~~ .t Ii t.~ i ~~ 1.~ r>~! ~ F rf !3 ~~ ` '~ F F. ~ ~' ~ 7 I ~ i ~ t ` ~ ~ ' b t~ ~ ~ ; .i ~t 7 t~ V ~ 3 ; ! 7~ : i ~ ~ ;: tr R ~ ~ ~ ' j ~ ~ ~ ~~ w ; ~ t~ ~ tt f t' ~ ~~ 1 ~ , ~ y _~ ~~ % ~ ~~~ "" { ~F II~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L 1 ; ~ 1 7 3 ~F ~ s ~ ~ .~ Y ~ i ~ y ,, ~ ! e t 3 't ~ ,~ : ~~ ~ ~ l , .i I ' ~ ~ 1 EE f ,~ ' , ~ 1 t .f i ~ i S t June 13, 2008 AZ 06-063 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Waltman, LLC ~ ITEM NO. $ REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from May 6, 2008 -Request for Annexation and Zoning of 38.68 acres from RUT to R-1 zones to C-G zones for Waltman Property -- 505, 521, 615, 8~ 675 Waltman Lane COMMENTS See Previous Item Packet / AAinutes CITY POLICE DEPT: C~~(~`,,~.~., '--'l.~~l.~-~. CITY FIRE DEPT: .~ ~_2~~ ~ AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: June 3, 2008 PP 08-001 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT SLN Planning, Inc. ITEM NO. 9 REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from May 6, 2008 -- Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 52 commercial /office lots and 1 common lot on 38.21 acres in a proposed C-G zone for Browning Plaza - 505, 521, 615, & 675 Waltman Ln. AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See Previous Item Packet /Minutes CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY ~~~ CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. June 13, 2008 ZOA 08-001 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT City of Meridian Planning Department ITEM NO. 10 REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from June 3, 2008 -Request for a Zoning Ordinance UDC Text Amdmt to modify, clean up & add specific sections to the UDC for Unified Development Code Text Amendment No. 4 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: See Previous Item Packet /Minutes ordu~anG OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meeflngs shall become properly of the City of Meridian. June 13, 2008 RZ 08-001 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Elisha Ricky ITEM NO. 1 ~ REQUEST Public Hearing -- Request for a Rezone of 0.32 acres from R-4 to O-T zone for Trinity. Assisted Living - 1535 West 1st Street AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See attached P&Z Item Packet /Minutes CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See attached Recommendations CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: QJ~L ~~ m CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: See attached Affidavit of Posting/Letter from Citizens Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. June 13, 2008 CUP 08-005 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT EIISha RICICy ITEM NO. ~ Z REQUEST Public Hearing -Request for a CUP to operate a 24-hour nursing care facility in a proposed O-T zone and also for a site & building that does not meet the criteria of Downtown Meridian Design Guidelines for Trinity Assisted Living AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See attached P&Z Item Packet /Minutes CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See attached Recommendations CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: ~ q CITY BUILDING DEPT: Q.J~ CITY WATER DEPT: ~~ CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: See attached Letter from Citizens Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~ I; ' ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ t ~ s r; ~ ~ ~ ~, ~} ~ I x , ~ ~~ ~~ ; ~ s~ t ~ ' ~ ` , , ~ yy ';d ib i l ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ i - ; o , ' ~ ;1 ~ j p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ }} i i, ~~ _ ,~. ~ i ~ ~ ~ ° 3 ~v ~ Z~, i f s' ~~~ , ' ` ~ ~ 1> K ~} of - 333 ~ t ~ , ~ <j ~ ) 1 . ! 1 ~~' { d ~. l y 1 (t hff arYi. J . i. t i 4 ~ ~~ t' y y7- i~ ~ ~ ,~ ~~ F ~ 1 a ~._ SSS _ iii 1 ~ ~ Y t '. ; ~ f ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' i,, i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 'P ~ t rt 1 ~ ~ t i t; i~ ; := ~'~ ~ ~ :, t ~ ~ , ~~ d i . y . June 13, 2008 MI 08-004 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT City of Meridian ITEM NO. 1$ REQUEST Public Hearing -Miscellaneous application for Modification of the Development Agreement for Dorado Subdivision - NWC of S. Eagle Rd 8~ E. Overland Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See attached Staff Report CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: ~~~,,~ ~ ~~~, _~ J ~ ~~~~ ' V~ ~ CITY BUILDING DEPT: M ~ - CITY WATER DEPT: ~ ~~ ~ _ ~~.s ®,~ CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: See attached Comments SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Request for Continuance from W.H. AAoore Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Cffy of Meridian. ~~~ ~~ ail # ~ ~, 'i ~ ' ~ r' ~ ~ ~ w; 1 f t ~~ ~~ t '~ y t 1! ` ; l ~ ` I .i s i h.i< ~~' ~ , k f ~ L; ~. ~ ~ Y ~ it ~~~ ' ~ ~ j ~ ; ~ +' Y I ~ f~ Y ~ ~ I ( ~ r ~ i } ~ 11 ~ ~~ ] ~ t ~ { t y 1 ~ ~ _ ' ~. r ~ i~ F~ i . i ~ {t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g~ ~ ` ' i ~' i i? June 13, 2008 TE 08-003 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT Blackhawk/Meridian, LLC ITEM NO. 14 REQUEST Public Hearing-18 month Time Extension to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the Fnal Plat for Kelly Creek Commercial 18th phase of Fulfer Sub) & commence the use approved w/the CUP in accordnace w/conditions of approval of AZ 03-013,PP 03-014, CUP 03-028 & TE 06-025 - NWC of Linder Road and McMillan Rd AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See affached Staff Report CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: See attached Comments SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: See attached Comments SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: See attached Response to staff report /Affidavit of Posting Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: ilAatertals presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. I~AI~1!w~i ~ A~~° i i! ~~~~~ii1 ~ .s ~ ~. r . 1 1 .1 i t ~ 7 i 1 i~ 1 p~ ~ t ~i `I L ~, i { , i~ 1 l ~ i~ ~ z { i E ~~ ~ ~ t"~ j ! _ ~S d; } t a ~ i :, ' I y: , ~ ~ . ~ I f s . ~ {~ ,~ ' i7 ~ S ; ~ ` ~.. ) t ~ A ~~ S ff F~ F ~ ' Y ~ ~ ~. S , 3 ~ ,~ }~ ~ ~ } t, 1S' ~ ~ t7t ~ ~ ' 1 ~ ~' 1 !~ t l I~ ,~ I f } ~ { ~ ~ l ~ r ~~ ::~ ~~ x ~ € ~ ~"'C' s ~~~ ~ t i~ , . ~ ~ t ~ f - r- !, ~ ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET DATE June 17, 2008 ITEM # 15 PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME Covered Load Ordinance PLEASE PRINT NAME FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~:, ~ ' ; , ; ~ ~~ ~ -~ s ~ ~ ~ i~''. i i 9 I Lfi ~ i 7 ~ ~ i I~ e ~ ~ ~ fR 4 ~ I ' 3~ I ~ ' ~ , ~ ~ i' ' ~; ~ i 1 i~ ~ ~ 3 ~~ t ; ® o June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT ITEM NO. ~ 6 REQUEST Ordinance -Covered Load Ordinance 1st of 3 Readings AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY See aAtached CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: h~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Page 1 of 1 Tara Green From: Emily Kane Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 3:22 PM To: Tara Green; Jaycee Holman Cc: Robert Simison; Bill Nary Subject: Covered Load Ordinance -First Reading on June 17 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Green Attachments: Covered Load Ordinance for 1st reading 6-17-08.doc Hi! Will you please include this proposed ordinance on the June 17 City Council agenda for first reading? Thank you! Emily Emily Kane Deputy City Attorney City of Meridian, Idaho Phone: 208-898-5506 Fax: 208-884-8723 E-mail: kanee@meridiancity.org 6/6/2008 ~ ~ June 13, 2008 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 17, 2008 APPLICANT ITEM NO. ~ 7 REQUEST Ordinance -Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting Time Change Odinance AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY See attached CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: ~ .~, CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. , a ~ ~ ~ i t ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' . ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ 2 i 1. '~ ., ; ~ 4 ~ '~ . ~ c r ~ l ~, ~ , i ~ ;~ ~ r ~ 1 ~ ~ I > '~ ' L i ~j ~~ { ~ d t r~; F Y 3 ~ F j; jj ~ S- ~~ ~ yy 5 t ~ ~., i ~ 4 ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ { ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~3, ' ~ ~ [ ~ ' ~ - 3 - - t ~ yy ~ ~ a fz ~ ~ ~~ [ ,~ k. ~ ~~ ~'` y ~ ~ ~ ~ li, , F ~ •~ ~ ~ A f ~ j. 1 1 +. ,~ g ( ~ ~ ~ ~ x t ~ ~ ~~ 4 ~~ ~ ~ ~` ~ Q Q ''i{, F ! E ~t t ~e ~• CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. ~ r J BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, ROUNTREE, ZAREMBA AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, AMENDING TITLE 2, CHAPTER 2, MERIDIAN CITY CODE, RELATING TO THE REGULAR MEETING TIME OF THE MERIDIAN PARK5 AND RECREATION COMMISSION; PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, for several months, the Meridian Parks and Recreation Commission has noticed and convened a special meeting at 6:00 p.m. preceding its 7:00 p.m. regular meeting, in order to hold workshops and subcommittee discussions; WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on May 14, 2008, the Meridian Parks and Recreation Commission voted unanimously to recommend that City Council amend Meridian City Code § 2-2-5 as set forth below in order to designate 6:00 p.m. as the regular meeting time; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian finds that this amendment will serve the public interest by improving operational efficiency; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO: Section 1. That Chapter 2, Title 2, of the Meridian City Code be amended to read as follows: Z-2-5: MEETINGS: The commission shall meet regularly each month at a time and place determined by the commission. The regular monthly meeting shall be held at ~~ a =.~'°sk f~:A9}I':~:, six o'clock (6:002p.m. on the second Wednesday of each month unless, at the.first meeting of each calendar year, the commission shall establish a meeting schedule for the calendar year in which event the published schedule shall apply. All meetings shall be open to the public and shall be publicized; the commission shall allow and promote public participation in the meetings of the commission. The commission shall also review and comment on any needed changes to the city's comprehensive plan as it relates to parks and recreation. Additional meetings of the commission maybe scheduled by the commission as necessary to carry out the business of the commission. SECTION 2: That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (1/2) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading in the full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance PARKS & RECREATION CONIMISSION MEETING TIME ORDINANCE PAGE 1 OF 2 ,_ ~ ~ ~ f ~~ ~s ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k ~ 1 `F ~ S ` ~ ;; a s 17 ( ~ ~ t E 3 Y ~. ~ , r ~ ~ S; i a~ ~ ~ f ~ tft F s, f ~ a ~~1 ~ ~ S~ ~ ~ R , i~ ~ i ~; ~; [ t { ~ F ~ 1 ; ~ f k 1 i 3. i ~ ~ ` ` ~ ~ ~~h ~ ~~ lll ~ ~ ~ ., 6 1 ~ : ~.'. ~ P 7 ~ L. ~ { ! {1 ~ ~ .. ~ r ~ ' a~ t S F ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ t ~~' k' r-: . ~ ~~. i a ~ ~ ;'; ( ~ ~ it sij ~ iii ; 3 ~ : [ 2~ I® ~~ shall be in full force and effect on the ~~ day of ~~ ~ , 2008, its passage, approval and publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this ~~ day of 2008. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this ~~~ day of ~, , 2008. APPROVED: MAYOR ~~ ATTEST: `\.~`~~ ,~~1 ~ %,~~~i' ~~~ o SEAL CITY ERK ~, 9 ~~~ //~'~~~n~~1 n~1~#g9''. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING TIME ORDINANCE PAGE 2 OF 2 rw~w~.r~ ~ n, ~ ~ w~w* r+w'~! [ T'~r F ~ _ ~~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~t rw~+w®ms~a, ~lwu~ r ~ f ~ ~ '~ '+ ~ _ k ' p ~ ( ~ ` p R' 7 - tf ~ d , t ,~ } j ~ ~ ~ ~~ i } 1~t 1 3~ ~ ~[( 1~ i ~ ~y P ~ p ~ t ~ 7 t S~ ~ F ~ + i fF t ~ `. . l ~ i `. k. J A 5 ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~( ( + ~ ~ I f 7 z` ~ . ~ ~ ~ 1 ~1 y ~ C st ~ ! I Jjh ~~~'~ fit g ~ 9 : ~ ~ ~~ i. }y :~s~~ ~ . ~ n 1 + # `~ r ~ ~ ~` ~ ~ ~ ~ y ' ', ~ ~ ' r ~ ~ 1 3 a - ~ o r' ~~ ~ yy t h ~ ~; F ~~ `~ EE { I~ S i l ~ ~ l i ' { ~ ~ { ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ tE i i _ ( ~ r _ ~ ` a.~ I ~~. ,~ I 1 r j6 - ~ f ~ ~~ ~ ` ~ _ G ~ ~ ~3~}, ~ ~ ~ } ~ r f f tt 75 ( ( [[ kk