Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Meridian Plaza Gentry Annexation
P&Z 2-11-80 COMMENTS GENTRY ANNEXATION REZONE I -MERIDIAN PLAZX- , ITEM: James Gipson - 939-0236 Kirk J. Anderson -375-0381 11192 Powderhorn Boise, ID 83704 Fairview Ave. across from Evans Professional Building TO "C" COMMERCIAL " ;' , I. Joseph Glaisyer: Why not make the rezone all commercial? I am against the residential and have some fears of strip commercial. 2. Chief Sherwin: Concerned over limited entrances to the project. Two at the northern end near th a commercial development and one at the southern end on Gruber St. to serve 36 residential units - would create traffic problem and safety problem. Heavy concentration of low square foot rentals creates additional Police problems - no indication of parking lot lighting. 3. Rick Orton: Appears to meet plan, recommend approval. 4. Richard Williams: Is Preliminary Site Plan going to be the Preliminary Plat? 5. Idaho Transportation Dept.: 1) 5' additional of right-of-way. 2) Deceleration lane. 3) Need dedicated north/south roads so khat land will not be landlocked. Need road on (N/S) of this development. 4) Appears as 333' deep not 433'. Description and'Scaling different. 6. Roger Welker: At this time,the Meridian Fire Department cannot proyide adequate fire protection with the equipment it now has. With the 1% Tax Initiative, we will not have the funds to properly give protection. Access is limited and could cause delay of emergency vehicles. Also, what guarantees Gruber St. will be extended through? We recommend that instead of strip commercial on the front, that the whole plot be rezoned commercial. Will need to go over Plan Review very closely for emergency vehicles. 7. Central District Health Dept.: No objections. Approve with Central sewage and Central water. Plans for Community sewage and Central water must be submitted. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 8. ACRD: Recommend the Plat,as presented, be denied for the following reason: No public access to the residential area. Also the Plat should be redesigned to include a public street on the east boundary which could serve both the commercial and residential areas. P&Z APPROVED, streets to be reviewed with design review. 2-11-80 Council APPROVED as specified in their application, with design review, and conditional use in whatever time they get ready to come in, and to issue a Conditional Use Permit within two years frEkm today's date, stipulation that the City Council and P&Z have t e right to all design review on the building. 3-3-80 CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Review Sheet Return to: _ Boise Rezone # c,,i,4nneX0_Y70N Wezony _ Eagle Conditional use #1 Meridian Preliminary/Final/Short Plat _ Runa ACZ We have no objections to this We recommend denial of this proposal. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. We will require more data concerning the depth of (high seasonal ground water)(solid lava) from original grade before we can comment concerning individual sewage dis- posal. We can approve this proposal for individual sewage dis- posal to be located (2,4) feet above high seasonal ground water, 4 feet above solid lava layers. We can approve this proposal for: Central sewage _Interim sewage _Individual sewage and —Central water _Individual water _Community water well. Plans for Community sewage _Sewage dry lines, and 4Central ater _Community water must be submitted to and pproved by the Regional Health and Welfare Environmental Services Office. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. This department would recommend deferral until high season- al ground water can be determined it other considerations indicate approval. � p •r S'=O s u�i O R+ 1D H G 40 4J 4)'" •r • t l H 'd •C •fn > 4- In r- a) 1n O a) rr 0 O a) a) ro A b 4J a)t X >>+)3 U O U q >1 as c s. U d C C ,� dl i s 1— L al s a• a) -C rt) N O 41 r. 4-) b 4J a) -C r0 t a1 aJ N EN > r- G. •r '.- CL= D) O c > W I. O 4) > 'r' 4j A GJ 3 r- O a) C> > U O 0) O 4- cz d 7 D S_ in O N s u m a c a) a O 4J S- O. a) a! 4) _ G).O t rts f0 -c -r S- •r z U) -1- - +- 4J U 3 4-) a) aJ Q! C L O Cyi LL- a) .0 Ln b VI .O 41 W •r ' •rc 4J •r '0 O O -0 4- 4-) cul . 4 •$4 O t0 0 3 c O V! c O O c0 •V O LA- N z +� W O•r S- O U r• a) r- r al N 'd 4-b H 'O a -O ¢ X r0 CLO- a) .0 O y H a in W c a) d W L. r Sn S. (0 -c to 4-3 r- a) U 4)-a c .c o .c ro G 4J c uV .� ai o > • -3-3 U r- •r � O > o •r•I O b O b 4J 4-> c b •r •r r 4J 4J Q; rl 4j X y H > s� b �rt s E .c c0 r0 a •V �kk 4) Lid N �t] N 41 •r N 3 .c i o U -rl Oi C N •� O 0 W ENm�ll •r o c �— > 1-� +d Fd Nb9+�cm U) m-� 4) 4J •r cam' Gi o Q� b L^ t E 'r •I-) • 4- q� Ft O Ci M Vl i O a •r O VI Cl 4) E 4•- 6N AFI 01 L Q� al •N c •r 4-) N S-.0 O •— E "•l 0 4- W N c o U a» U (D r— S- `" ,4 a, d E A U° ¢ U a) 3 a ¢ a) co S_ 1� 3 4- W .. u0. N N r-1 p4 W H J 3 r4 tp U CV W ,-1 '•� Pow V N ro •3 OCD a m °Ln' ri N o N o a V U) W P4 u u V 14 , u A a s .[ 41 O.rq 4J � b .. q n H u w u a`ai O b a� N H •rl H •rl t73 9r U ^,J U) p W w o 4i 3 N o p°, • 4 o 0 R w •V �. N •H !�u a P .-1 ul r4 44 V a) •rl N 0) rl N •V .V W O+ a ai E) rd °0� go 3 'HxvU) -r4 >,W r -I a -4 •o$4 aV10 O 3 N UU a)to O m " H 41 si » cn a) rn 2c W 41 r♦ 0 a+ .� °) H u N N U a g 0)N - 4 N In D H .l W rl •$4 rl V $ ahc i r"s aa, > u h C z 2: Q b� �9 m Commission Meeting - February 7, 1980 Page 2 I SUBDIVISIONS - PRELIMINARY PLATS Maplewood Subdivision - John Joines presented the plans and said the proposed develop - rant will belocate off Ustick and Maple Grove, 107 lots. Discussion held concerning the requirements. The Commissioners agreed with the recommendations made by staff. f BarneySubdivision - John Joines presented the plans and said the proposed develop- ment will be located north of Cherry Lane in Meridian. He explained what has been required by staff. The Commissioners agreed with staff requirements. f: Meridian Plaza - Proposed development to be located south of Fairview in Meridian. Mr. Joines explained the requirements placed by staff. The Commissioners agreed with the requirements by staff. is Sandy Creek - John Joines presented the plat and said it is located off Milwaukee 3t`reet. The standard requirements have been placed on the subdivision. The Commissioners agreed with staff requirements. A Little Subdivision - John Joines said this is a preliminary plat and they have also submitted a Condififonal Use on the same development. The number for the Conditional Use is'CU-5-80, and is for duplex lots. To be located off Palouse Street. John -Joines explained that two properties are jointly developing the units and installing a cul-de-sac for access. Discussion of the proposed project held. The Commissioners agreed with staff requirements. CONDITIONAL USES 0 CU -5-80 - Duplex Lots - See above under "A Little Subdivision". GU -4-80 - Triangle Development - John Joines explained the area of the development and that itwill be for seventy-nine zero lot line residences. It is the proposed Lakewood No. 11 being changed. Discussion of the proposed project followed. To be located off Gekeler Lane. Further discussion held concerning drainage in the area. Mr. Joines to contact F. Brewster Smith to make him aware of the proposed develop- ment. The Commissioners agreed with staff requirements. NON -DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DISCUSSION - Discussion held concerning the non -development agreement that has been propose y the developers of Canonero West. Gary Funkhouser explained that Mr. Joines has written an agreement that could be used and recorded to withhold the sale of the property until approval by the Highway District. The cities were contacted and seemed to feel that whatever the Highway District wanted to do with regard to the streets was fine with them. Commissioner Fairbanks explained that he feels he would like to have more time to think about this proposal. Further discussion followed concerning the problems and inequities of allowing the non - development agreement.' The developer suggested that something be developed that would allow the plat to be recorded without having to come up with all the upfront money until construction can be started. No action taken. Eagle Village No. 3 - Discussion held concerning Eagle Village No. 3 and their request is for a non -development—` agreement. These developers have not filed their plat yet and can get their plat extended. The Commissioners agreed that the request for a non - development agreement for Eagle Village No. 3 be denied since there is a possibility of a time extension with the City of Eagle. G E r• 41 d• C O ro w O U .d N O w P4 PI w z � u Lu w ca z Z a) 4J Ln tm O fd C .O ai r- m a3i r -- •r b L. o U- 0 a) 4- •• O .� - N 4 N ro G O r -I 9 W ro a -#4 s (D O 4- w + a. a ro a L u 41 w N w rd N � •O Qa ro N T al 0 O U � N � O N O Ill U) -A U A U �1 h N v S Z J J 0 � � 0 Q CJ 0. V °c D Q a w � J v y ,o ,N h � h o � 1.1..ro UJN W u Z (D z z ro Lli41 ,d a, W r N r•) ro O .r.) V Z Cl) b a I h J J v C 0. °c Q a V � J ,o ,N 4J ° 1.1..ro UJN W u Z (D z z ro Lli41 ,d a, W r N r•) ro O .r.) V Z Cl) b a I r♦ 60 4 (d °c a ta c o Ln ,o ,N 4J ° 1 0M r4 10 'd a N 4;Vf A rel N U •rY1 w U U I )O rI w 4J � x UM U a � �. to H w u a 4J o o �� tob C 'S U ., - O a) 4-J C. c O N L In aJ Q •� b 1- O Li .o a) 4- O ro s. u n- ro � u b O H W In a) 1r E H O v s. 0 4- H 4-3 134 N v aJ A L H V) Qa O b O ro ani 41 0 O U +J � '>7 O q R 0) O •1J al N w `n 0 .a 0 5+ H bm H N O •� N N 9v .0 ri 44) W rr-4 n ro $ pp u Cd . H w ro w 0 w H P.4 (D u •,4 44 44 O +J U) O P4 �v AH W t. 4j H OC 00 Lo s 110 W 4J • cit a U) Mta rt1 w �•� �:- Baa, Im, pp A r-1 r-1 -A d••Ji� .) � b+ 9, • r .-4 rd O J 9 u 'Jr .0 n1 OO E• U .4J 1 1 N +� ' 4 H ri O a) N p• N a W. P •4J N ba q� A 4J y a do IJ ro� u a ro ' �' ' r"1:. Q rl . p. r 41 u •ri H 4J In •ri A O t 41 4j tp H E H A N H N O •� N N 9v .0 ri 44) W rr-4 n ro $ pp u Cd . H w ro w 0 w H P.4 (D u •,4 44 44 O +J U) O P4 �v AH W t. 4j H OC 00 Lo s 110 W 4J • cit a U) Mta rt1 w �•� �:- Baa, Im, pp A r-1 r-1 -A d••Ji� .) � b+ 9, • r .-4 rd O J 9 u 'Jr .0 n1 OO E• U .4J 1 1 N +� ' 4 H ri O a) N p• N a W. P •4J N ba q� A 4J y a do IJ ro� u a ro ' �' ' r"1:. Q rl . p. r 7-r- •wu�U) 0 1iN aii 0 e� Is Fol14 M 0 OD C NN po V i aJ AS c •N r� B i m C •rl a) • H c �, >4J 4J v, w 4- w Q a �-1 A m P+ - U) r- r a N H N� •r •r 69 0 FC ' ti v 41 9 a � aJ ... � b � H oc C N H of 7 g N p N +J A t1 +J 113 . U rz U t5 JNr -I W N N UW C 30•i rk •U O 0 q C4 a d 4-3 N .O N E A 14 N p' +J @ 44 v $0a) W m E j GAJ tZ -4p I al H Q� 2 4-3 U A 0 � a' N �jw G+ i (n U Y b N N a) u w z N b N 41 a) .�i U) b O •.I r4 b b a v 6. •+ 1441V N O U 41 3 0� o 41 t-1 � °' 0 o `1 °° P4b r4 •M N p R 4J N d w 0 U W U H r -I u N +1 N A P+4J 0 rd NQ 1a 1.1 to tJ 41 tr •rml r-4 (aa A b �C � � q 14 440 44 O 4J 3 IuN) . t p1 9 H N b $4 q p U q tT u f-4 a) t0 -,r-1q 41 r) N N N O 41 a) a) U ra O ,-i rl N Q O a) „c tT W 41 E 14 .[ � O 3 r 3 u a) w� tr ra + 4 N m .t~ •,4 4 4J rO W 14 Ln to stal En 3 W � v� � �� rt A 0 m x4 Nw wotri to 4) +�P°a, oa�w$4M 3 'd rd b ro b � u° a4J rq a) Nu u m r-4 :5 +1 • D4 z O O 0,9 S r }: 4 ow 0 b •O w rid 3 O a 41 U 41 !O -I N 14 4J O N O N N .i U U On r� 3 •� `, • I I b N N 0) U N z N rd DJ 4J N .C: H to 0 O .H 4.1 b b v ..l N 0 U aJ H ,rd J$ OCO 41 w In o `;' cd a b ,o �� c U La a U •N aJ N $ Co99 �D A trl N b N N A b y U •o q 4 41 O m rd U 41 tP a N 1 rd A �N tp H H 11 •u :. w i' U +i + B r�J L9 r A H W A O aJ {$ IU) +, O A �{ ani O ri U u d+ U a 0 0) 3r-4 tw 41a 4J W On a H •� Hii m u p o +1 a� o a U PC o r-4 • 4 U)$3 o a b+ •r { - i a b - IT a rd .t.' kl x •A (". Ui -H P+ w U • i 'Jr •'•{ 'Jr to f+1 x H 'e .o r -I a 3 3 o U a a �+ tr 10 $, ,cs u ° 'En3 u:rtu .O � w (d Id� i �) V 4 O '{ +m O Cf r HRI O 1d W sM d a '0 'C3 � U w A m U c'oi /�� -I M� 1$4 o •r a t) � ?' w� a N •�[pj'!Id a -d oo P �I 0 V W W a W Q L/ Ni w 14 Ci To N •A •'l u HLl N•14 0 1019 x.rl�: H C s>'jEu c O �, V OD U9 .r "4 R7 W O U 3�1 O .. N N OC rd N C O a U O .I {a X b SE C O N Oai .. a � z w ,i C DG 14 W ow 0 b •O w rid 3 O a 41 U 41 !O -I N 14 4J O N O N N .i U U On r� 3 •� `, • I I b N N 0) U N z N rd DJ 4J N .C: H to 0 O .H 4.1 b b v ..l N 0 U aJ H ,rd J$ OCO 41 w In o `;' cd a b ,o �� c U La a U •N aJ N $ Co99 �D A trl N b N N A b y U •o q 4 41 O m rd U 41 tP a N 1 rd A �N tp H H 11 •u :. w i' U +i + B r�J L9 r A H W A O aJ {$ IU) +, O A �{ ani O ri U u d+ U a 0 0) 3r-4 tw 41a 4J W On a H •� Hii m u p o +1 a� o a U PC o r-4 • 4 U)$3 o a b+ •r { - i a b - IT a rd .t.' kl x •A (". Ui -H P+ w U • i 'Jr •'•{ 'Jr to f+1 x H 'e .o r -I a 3 3 o U a a �+ tr 10 $, ,cs u ° 'En3 u:rtu .O � w (d Id� i �) V 4 O '{ +m O Cf r HRI O 1d W sM d a '0 'C3 � U w A m U c'oi /�� -I M� 1$4 o •r a t) � ?' w� a N •�[pj'!Id a -d oo P �I 0 V W W a W Q L/ Ni w 14 Ci To N •A •'l u HLl N•14 0 1019 x.rl�: F 5 41 U •rl N V d1 A Ul 2 ro z g 41 41 ro r4 a t-1 to W .d >1 O 41 V ro ra a r•I ro a •rt W ta 41 w w A .O o V to rl U N A •� o x � 0 U I tO N x 0 U •.I 9, •r) A .0 b N U m I b A 4JI fV ep o 41 co r•I � H $4 CO.' A!PM 1 CD N •r cr r- � 'O CL. r 0 w t• C O © a- 4 F 5 41 U •rl N V d1 A Ul 2 ro z g 41 41 ro r4 a t-1 to W .d >1 O 41 V ro ra a r•I ro a •rt W ta 41 w w A .O o V to rl U N A •� o x � 0 U I tO N x 0 U •.I 9, •r) A .0 b N U m I b A 4JI fV ep o 41 co r•I � H $4 CO.' A!PM O w .r.• N N C G p •t b� C 4 m rn �, CD z z F 5 41 U •rl N V d1 A Ul 2 ro z g 41 41 ro r4 a t-1 to W .d >1 O 41 V ro ra a r•I ro a •rt W ta 41 w w A .O o V to rl U N A •� o x � 0 U I tO N x 0 U •.I 9, •r) A .0 b N U m I b A 4JI fV ep o 41 co r•I � H $4 CO.' A!PM O w F 5 41 U •rl N V d1 A Ul 2 ro z g 41 41 ro r4 a t-1 to W .d >1 O 41 V ro ra a r•I ro a •rt W ta 41 w w A .O o V to rl U N A •� o x � 0 U I tO N x 0 U •.I 9, •r) A .0 b N U m I b A 4JI fV ep o 41 co r•I � H $4 CO.' A!PM CL 4JV C COL. b .E V N i\ V! 0 0m \ M 4J S- V f- 47 rp C ul -A 04 w G N > V A O 4- ix Q m O ri v N 3 a z v11� b it •S-- O CNi b .. N O — �d Li V1 y m .� ( Q� m N - rd O ii m C p a m `j O U id N 0 O o *' u r_ U 41 U Q o C9 41 X aro, H i? � o � • s% kl > ro + a .N ® ro 044J 44 a v w 'IM �, d v - A u R, OU H U -4 • ..l D, p •I.! r4 r%I $ O co 41 a w o� to r•I ri O •rl N a r + v 1--4 rl b •rI P4 ra V m v 4J r -I 1 od At �+ P4 rd b.. ta -ii rd qH N H ri • N V N r U W U m Ll •rl Ci E+ +�+ H •ri $4 •rI �' 101 O C rel m to A H W O O 4j 3 I to 1 pI� +1 rl o a R 0�1 °o O r >1 y�j Q U x .I mw r 41 m - 1 $4 m �+ Z -rt U) (d 4J 4J x US V. 0)to .ro i i w W N N .� x 1 m� m u ro O ri -4 w 9:O m ,p tT •r I a rn •ra a rf I U • a. -4>r .0 r~ M A H O 3 rr. 3 � u cm) m ri to ro $4 ►+ ca 4j c� .N m rI V ao •,' 4j V rO 9 W vii � 'al vi 3 w ( � r 3 � � � O 9 � N . n V ) w o ro 4J a) o V w roe 3 ro b ro b b� u P-4 3 o m m vmi u u wi m m ri •r+ o, $4 •rI $4 u w •rt o •M H •.•I N m r~ o b m m m m m kw � b e�wa c'.r �raav AU P3 w z wH •rt •14 i 0 0 0 a� N W 0 M w° a N) s N •1•..t 0 N N r -I O t+ C tt3� O U N O C!7 0)% H C C 0 x •� U � o rtS C U) r '� O 'N C 44 ., b 0 10, U c d a 4 4 w O N r O O 4_ w .1..1 ro W GD 14 N U) CD _ oa z n] $4 5- A4 O b 0 M w° a N) s N •1•..t 0 N N r -I O t+ O O O U N O C!7 OO 41 i-1 � X N x tI o rtS C P4 'N C 44 ., CD 4 4 O' 14 N 0 M w° a N) s •1•..t N 0) b, rcl N O tI rtS C •rl L..•' N N r .1..1 ro W CD oa z 5- O ; 7 Id 'r r. to •'- (A O •rl •1-1 )•i 1) U) d-) LL N N O - rd 0 O rd CL) H .� 17] ro S- n' N a' Q) 4-)r- I N y G ro U U •-1 O >LLI S4 rU O d N UU rl O 0 ra •rl t O P4 Jv • N U) O �i E N rci Nf� L 04. rC O 4- N d v R; 4 -)CU U � U 5 Irl 0 .cOy' •-) 1 O H U w � V 4.)1-1 +1 d `$ Opp r-4 Cd a M', 1 r1 . -I .O •rq CV O Ch r.l r."4 CO b •rl r a w b ry E) U ta r 4J U 9: to 'r I •� N N $4 .O .D �. A ra N H N P-1 v • 1-I I'Nd N r -I rr-I .1 4J 4 J ro N N -H Ub U 'U 0 :4 >� rq H N O U) 444 0 O .4J $ " INO �• � fr r•1 -4 r -I U) }4 %4 O 41 '� N C: N U rd O r -I U) �' O N 4 •r1 d) • 4 N rd rl is N ro 4 $-1 54 x •rl A cn •r) a a U •r1 >, •r1 >I .O GC H W U r -I O� r�O{{ N 0 U (1) (L) N W r}a� k k A +� V y dl .L4 -r-I .1.1 41 rd .' :1 U) � to 3 W Id � (� �' � 9 2 r -I i•1 4J W rl 14 Wf+' �v 11 •rl 1 r1 `4 14 (d O P-1 .G a U) U) V 4) �'� W O (d V N O 4a 7`I m k$4 r17 ro 'd 'U b d 1 U a IJ 4) r♦ d) '0 9 r -I U I~ d) 4) H rl RI •rl -Hrl .IJ rd t~ L; � d) rn U U Id r -I O k ra tr D $4 � $4 ro ro O Oi 4) O 4) O m $4 •r1 p N U)�a� .a `� U J O O O c tT q •rl O N N v ko •ri 4.JOOD IEn a 9 n 54 ro %a .54 0) N .� I CDH NW ¢ to a) N .N OD U) L a v a) (o o c to On 1 •SSI ro H r r.. ( U fid N) N •rl 14 4J r— � to A a) a) m '.3 r -I U r N3 aaii 0 m -rq 0 a (h r�-i-1 •s- •N rq $4H fid Vi � .E to.�- a) V a) 2 a) v o r 4 tA I (a 2i o > r°i C7 rd a r I w aro) U •tea •rr R( � to) rn •rl A4 iu 4a � 0 v Ra ul 4 ru a) r) w to -- H g Z O a) AAy U) v � R; Icli AU0O a W H U ii En UW UC 41 ro O C w 0 o r -I rt .O -H ato 4J M Cd W ro w 0) vo �4 0 tp A $4 rs m 10 0 0 P4 U) —4 v u aa) A v a ►a � H A k 44 t),x O rj 0q 0 N H :3 !4 V1 b U) ,-� H O •T -I U U j to U (d ! ry' U A a) 9$4 p O o t".• •r4 tr a' H 0 A •ri N 'Ji •rl O C.' C,' Q) O (d 4J O >1 ?a H W ' 1d' N $4 k r -i U) r-4 44 d•) a) rl i 4 a) 'Jy �+' ri a) (d +) +) x Cd j a rq a g r) •ra r� t7 0) r o +J x a a to � ao a 0 •� r. �+ >4 4 Ei ]C H R; c'Oi 0 0 3 ri() 4) to A 4 0) 0 H o O agi A U � -P �� r1 4-) 00 O� 43 a a .0 N m A4 m cn r a) [n 3 W� 4-) •� � r: ri ( o� go 4 .A "'. to (n 41 o a o (d .v a) o a� 44 k M g b ro 47 R7 'a i 4 U a a► I(d a R q 0 ra a) m u v 0 � OOj � r. •4 trl i5 � �+ � �� spa k N 0 (d (d d ami p' to ' ' Z ' ' ' SINa Oh J w Com' •rl C: Nro U t O O O .a) N 14 •O t;. Z H O�rx'. 4J N a) er O H %•I M � O 4J Op O E G A 4-) x H X a) CC � H W Q S•. +-) a� CD v a. 0 00 1 N H A R H U) WO' a R a) C O N its U a) E O n U U) b o ro rq ri O U a) O L4 ro 44 z U •rl a) ro U O N .r{ p a) a O R: a) H I 4J G N O Q) N tS 'd OM � En -4r. � 'r. G o a -20 zro •° 4. r +J a) 4-) �4 '0 Q) O z G a) O N U) -r-I a $4 En P4 U 4 Ur -I G •rl G � 3 •� 4J ro Q z O H H O U m z E U E (a U) m Q) U N z U) ro 0 ro E0 r -I ro G O .rl .rq 'b r -I U 4 0 0 � 3 41 Cd ro w 0 o a i rd o N G .0 N o o0 w a U W a) N 0 �4 �?J tT ri 4I �4S4 .� G G A y U � U) . +J O •rl tn (ddN a t)n N ro U 4J in a) rl td Q rd G tr rl (Zrl x N N O H - 1 >4 H 'Jv U r -I G .G A H N m to • 4a G O .4.) 3 w �, G ),.l 'b rn r -I O •rl (J U ,G U) U R7 ptil O G G rl CP a' r A � G ,qa) En >4 r-1 O G G a) o rd .0 G >i s4 -rl s4 a N �{ ri W —4 44 +J a) •rl S4 a) >4 4 rl N rd 4J 4J x W Gro d' G r -I r -I —13 r -I N �4l4 O +J a) G a) U z) O r-1 -rl N G O a) to %Da) •rl a) rd rl t;) a) rd 4 �4� x -rl G U) •rl W P4 U •rl >4 •rl >, 4 G r") H x ,G -4 G$ G 3 G U a) (1) r -I tP a �4 ! 4 q A •FJ S" d•J y H 4� OD GG+ rA R' +I U rd x � m Q) 3 W rd rt3 ri ro 3 G 41 U) M 4J •rl 1 H -4 H rd O r-1 q rt3 Q 4J p., rl .G 04 �4 W G rI 44 $ d•1 10 rd 'd V �4W U ,.G fix, 4J ri ro H � a) G r-4 Q) Qa (L) N O v (0M• .4" U 4J ro � r -I —I a) U G O G �l G a) -r-I !4 a) W M r-1 �4 KtN" � —1Rr k •rl �4 —1 44 rl P 4J G (d rd 10 � a) a) pa •rl rd a1 o O H >`I -H�4 a) G o o ro a) a) a) o v a 'o Po k b 'sem+ ro m a h x. 0 w> F4 U a h w z z U FC �C b u O n P ,I r JAMES GIPSON, ARCHITECT / PLANNER 187 EAST BEACON LIGHT ROAD, EAGLE, IDAHO 83616 PHONE (208) 939-0211, (208) 939-0236 December 21, 1979 Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission City of Meridian City Hall Meridian, Idaho 83642 Gentlemen: Project No. 7812 Meridian Plaza Meridian, Idaho We are submitting herewith a preliminary site plan for the Planning and Zoning Commission. We request a preliminary hearing with that Commission on January 14, 1980, for the purpose of determining that Commission's reaction and recommendation for this project. Based on the Commission's recommendation, we then intend to apply for final approval of this development. If there is any additional information we can provide at this point, please advise us and we will respond accordingly. Very trulys, 4JS*GIPSO,,ur RCHITECT/PLANNER Representative of the Applicant JG/sl Enclosures cc: Mr. Kirk Anderson Mr. Richard Scown F � t HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live j OFPIOIALb CITY OF MERIDIAN MAOVIINItf� E LAWANALNIBMANN,City Clork,P.O. RICHARD 0.WILWMa f A. M• KUMAT, TMUMM 728 Meridian Street GRANT P. KINGBFORD ROGER EHERWIN, Chief of Pollan BILL BREWER W=4,9TUART,Water WW1Iu8411. MERIDIAN, IDAHO JOHN O. FITZGERALD, Attoona 83842 DONALD L. SHARP ROGER WWAER, Piro Chief Phone 888.4433 Chairman Zoning 8, PiemneO EARLM�fAIIR,Wypi1W1111i►Bupl. J �i JOSEPH L. OLAISYER i Mayor December 20, 1979 „S James Gipson Rt 1, Beacon Light Rd. , Boise, ID 83702 L tl Dear Mr. Gipson: I think it would be a good plan to fill out the Preliminary Plat form as much as you can at this point. This is very helpful and the Planning and Zoning Commission can review this before the meeting. The City Clerk should have at least seven (7) correlated copies no later than January 10, 1980. This includes the cover �. letter, map and Preliminary Plat Submission Form. r The Planning and Zoning Commission meets only once a month, j perhaps s this would save you time and effort. This is not a requirement for appearing for input. A copy of a vicinity map is enclosed for your use. Sincerely, (t. aWana L. Niemann 41 •, City Clerk( LLN/mb j. % cc: File a (A• 1,9 JAMES GIPS®N, ARCHITECT ROUTE I, BEACON LIGHT ROAD, PHONE (208) 939-0236 BOISE, IDAHO 83702 Jammy 26, 1979 City of meridian City Hall Meridian, Idaho 836¢2 Attention: Yx. Pat Joy Projeot No. 7812 Meridian Plaza Meridian, Idaho Gentlemen: We are submitting herewith preliminary site plan and elevation study for the Planning and Zoning Commission. We request a preliminary hearing with that commission on February 12, for the purpose of determining the oommission's reaction and recommendation for this project. We appreciate your assistance in the matter. If there is any additional information we can provide at this points please advise us and we will respond accordingly. Very truly JAM GEM39. Representative of the Applicant Jd/sl Go Nr. Rich Soown W January 24,1980 Honorable Mayor Glaisyer and the Meridian City Council Meridian City Hall 728 Meridian Street Meridian, Idaho Re: Rezone of the "Gentry Property" Dear Mayor Glaisyer: I am the owner of record of a five acre parcel of real property located on Fairview Avenue directly across the street from the Evans Professional Building. I have attached a.legal description of the property for further identification. Presently the property is zoned commercial 250 feet back from the northern boundry. The remainder of the property is 2mned residential -A. The purpose of this letter is to request that that portion of land north of Five Mile Creek and bordering the land zoned commercial on the south be rezoned commercial from residential -A. This would allow a commercial development back to Five Mile Creek which seems to be a natural boundry for a development. I feel this would not only enhance the development of the property, but that it would enhance the City of Meridian. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, v Allen Gentry 4595 Shamrock Boise, Idaho 83704 STATE OF IDAHO )ss. COUNTY OF ADA ) On this ;?�y of January,1980, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ALLEN GENTRY known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first ab e written. 1kesiding at�,pq� Commission xpires: THE EAST 4 OF THE NORTHEAST k OF THE NORTHEAST k OF THE NORTHWEST k OF SEC- TION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: A STRIP OF LAND LYING SITUATE BETWEEN THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE -1 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN, AND A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 50.0 FEET DISTANT SOUTHERLY FROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTER LINE OF HIGHWAY AS SURVEYED AND SHOWN ON THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF U. S. 30 - PROJECT NO. F-32810) HIGHWAY SURVEY ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO AND LYING IN PORTIONS OF THE NORTHEAST k OF THE NORTHWEST k AND THE NORTHWEST ;4OF THE NORTHEAST 14 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN: BEGINNING AT STATION 41+85.0 OF THE SAID HIGHWAY SURVEY, WHICH STATION IS A POINT ON TANGENT APPROXIMATELY 4.0 FEET NORTH AND 343.3 FEET WEST FROM THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN; THENCE RUNNING NORTH 88047' EAST 433.0 FEET TO STATION 46+18.0 OF SAID SURVEY, WHICH STA- TION IS A POINT ON TANGENT APPROXIMATELY 3.0 FEET NORTH AND 90.0 FEET EAST FROM THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. P 08 0 0 c January 28,1980 LaWana Niemann I Meridian City Hall 7.28 Meridian Street Meridian, Idaho Re: Request for Subdivision Approval "Gentry Property" Dear Mrs. Niemann: Attached please find the "Request for Subdivision Approval" for our proposed residential project on the above -referenced Property. As you know we intend to develop the front portion of the property into a professional office complex and the back acreage will be a residential project. Contemporaneous with the submission of this application we have also filed a request for a rezone of a portion of the property from residential to commercial. We do not intend to subdivide the property,but rather to develop it as a complete project. Accordinwl.y, some of the questions in the application did not apply to our particular project. If you or the members of the commission have any questions or if they are in need of additional information we will be happy to respond in more detail. Thank you for your consideration in this matter `* Sincer , irk J. Anderson 111 Powderhorn Boise, Idaho 83704 k a A L. 'l REQUEST FOR SUBDIV1SIOU A1T1tc VTk1• Y PRELIMINARY PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: Appendix I. 1, See City policy statement, Submission Requirements, App Clerks possession plat approval must be in the City 2. A request for preliminary p the regular meeting of the Planning and no later than three days following Zoning Commission. 3, The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request was made• s the process it may be acted upon at•subsequent monthly �. After a proposal enterprocedures and d meetings provided ocumentation are received the necessary llowing the Planning and.Zoning Commission action. before 5:90 P.M., Thursday GENERAL INFORMATION: MERIDIAN PLAZ 1. Name of Annexation and subdivision,------ 2. ubdivision,2, General location, "Gentr Pro er "- wife Al en and Mabel Gentry,husband and 3, owners of record, 83704 Telephone 376-2945 _•._ 4595 Shamrock, Boise Idaho zip_:_ Address 11192 powderhorn;Boise.Tcl 83704 Kirk J. Anderson Address,________ 4; Applicant, James GipsonAddress187 E.B ancon Light - t James. Gipson Firm 5• 83611 Telephone 939-0236 I Eagle I Zip billings : Name Kirk J . ,Ander so 6. Nom® and address to receive City ip 83704 Telephone750 �_r__1 - - — Address 11192 Powderhorn Sois� — PRE IMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST, Subdivision Features 1• Acres 5 r of lots 1 Pro erty is not being subdivided, butdeveloped into a Z• N"�'ye commercial and residential Project) 3 • Lots per acre 4, Density per acre Residential will have app rox.. 12 units per acre. Resi e - 5, Zoning classifioation(s) Comtnner limits but within the cation N/A -In ---q it _limits, 6. If the proposed subdivision •is outside theaonra. pclassifi ian City jurisdictional mile, what is •the existing 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt Yes C1 -t -y in pro 1 i:ng a greenbelt. 4 8. Have recreational easements been provided for Yes • We desire t0 work With the I recreational amenities to the City 9. Are there proposed Explain Yes • A bike and walkin t 16. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? Yes. an Explain There will be common areas for the a la ar S. For future parks? Yes Explain There will be "tot - lots" for children living the residential development. 1 in AE:QUEST FOR kJ hZ��rrar,vv ^l,r,'c: .Page 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision features continued What schools) service the area Meridia Sc ooTs, do you propose any agreements for future school sites Explain Explain 12. other proposed amenities to the City Water Supply ,Yg-s--- Fire Department other , Explain Owners intend to extend Gruber Street to t e rc� r v ��p L� 4j acent to e ?rolec i sq '.c,��nt resideritifl ff.i.tl M Ire v ,)to tet sf� the 13. Type o Building Rest entia , Commercia , ndu ria o � - • Cornmercia P front ortio Ctial 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single family, Duplexes, Multiplexes, other Multi-plexes 15. Proposed development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s), b. Minimum square footage of structure(s), Residential -800-100 sq. ft • c. Are garages provided for,, Carports square footage d. Are other coverings provided for e. Landscaping has been provided for Yes _, Describe Lawn and planting areas will surrvun f. Trees will be provided for Yes Trees will be maintained Yes � g. Sprinkler systems are provided for Yes h. Are there multiple units 71a / Type E rsht-,>> gvesremarks�� .�y.^_____ J. Are there special set back requirements ' Yes, Explain At the Five Mile Creek and the Green_. j. Has off street parking been provided for_. Explain There are 1.5 plus parking spaces per residential unit. Parkin a fob the co er.cia L area has,` gT yen sen orova.acd for. k. Value range of property 1. Type of financing for development m. Protective covenants were submitted No �• Date - i 16. Does the proposal land lock other property No / Does it create Enclaves No STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as +� required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. January 28,1980 LaWana Niemann Meridian City Hall 728 Meridian Street Meridian, Idaho Re: Request for Subdivision Approval "Gentry Property" Dear Mrs. Niemann: Attached please find the "Request for Subdivision Approval" for our proposed residential project on the above -referenced Property. As you know we intend to develop the front portion of the property into a professional office complex and the back acreage will be a residential project. Contemporaneous with the submission of this application we have also filed a request for a rezone of a portion of the property from residential to commercial. We do not intend to subdivide the property,but rather to develop it as a complete project. Accordi4y, some of the questions in the application did not apply to our particular project. If you or the members of the commission have any questions or if they are in need of additional information we will be happy to respond in more detail. Thank you for your consideration in this matter Sincer n, Fir CQ %Oyk.k Anderson 111 Powderhorn Boise, Idaho 83704 k REQUEST FOR SUBDIV1SION lippROVAL w _ ' PRELIMINARY PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: 1. See City policy statement, Submission Requirements, Appendix I. 2. A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request was made. 4. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at -subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P -M., Thursday following the Planning and.Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision, MERIDIAN PLAZA 2. General location, "Gentr Pro ert "- Allen and Mabel Gentry,husband and wife 3. Owners of record, zip83704 Telephone 376-2945 _ Address 4595 Shamrock, Boise, Idaho ------ 4. Applicant, Kirk J: Anderson Address, 111.92 Powderhorn,Boise. Id. 83704 Architect James Gipson Firm James GipsonAddress187 E.Beac_on_Ligbtd 5 . XV-duk ► . Eagle, Idaho Zip 83611 Telephone 939-0236 I 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name Kirk J . Ander son Address 11192 Powderhorn, ]low.; Trip- 83704 Telephone_ 375-0381 pRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres 5 2. Number of lots 1 (Property is not being subdivided, but developed into a commercial and residential project) 3. Lots per acre will have approx. 12 units per acre. 4. Density per acre Residential 5. Zoning classification(s) Commercia and Resident - 6. if the proposed subdivision is outside the.Meridian City limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is -the existing zoning classification N/A -In city limits 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt Yes 8. Have recreational easements been provided for Yes. We provieto ing aerk with greenbelt. e 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City Explain Yes. A bike and Walking at 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? Yes. _ Explain ' awn G ; n t-hA c=j —and j There will be common areas for the re��PG1Q�nL1di areas For future parks? Yes Explain 1 There will be "tot -lots" for children living in the residential development. (1) 'REQUEST FOR kBZLIMTNARY PLAT: Page 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision features continued 11. what school (s) service the area Meridian —Scbnnl_s ► do you propose any agreements for future school sites , Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the City____L Water Supply yes Fire Department , Other , Explain Owners intend to extend Gruber Street to the port--y—and fully i mp-rova it ent to tfte---pfro�,ect 5 su fic�elnt residenti ld it � ee � )to us�tnS , the 13. Type o Building (Re identia , Commercial,n u ria o Commercial (Professional off, c, -P -,,,,,,,),,front portion of property_fis;sdagktial 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single family, Duplexes, Multiplexes, other Multi-plexes 15. Proposed development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s), b. Minimum square footage of structure(s), Residential -800-100 sq.ft. c. Are garages provided for,. carports square footage d. Are other coverings provided for - e. Landscaping has been provided for Yes Describe Lawn and planting ureas will surround all units and -narking areae f. Trees•will be provided for YeS , Trees will be maintained Yes g. Sprinkler systems are provided for Yes h. Are there multiple unitsy� �'YPe+���� •_,.,,,.g�lesr emarks i. Are there special set back requirements ` Yes, Explain At the Five Mile Creek and the Green -Belt _dreag j . Has off street parking been provided forges _ Explain There are 1.5 plus parking spaces per residential unit. Parkin f area has a so JDeen provided for. k. Value range of property 1. Type of financing for development m. Protective covenants were submitted No , Date 16. Does the proposal land lock other property -40-1 Does it create Enclaves No STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer, All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. (2) u Meridian Cit Hall 0 5. • Agenda 8 The Mayor read Ordinance No. 366 Gentry Rezone entitled: March 17, 1980 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND CHANGING THE ZONING IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED IN PART OF THE E 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN, IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, WHICH PROPERTY IS ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Kingsford that the rules and provisions of 50-9002 and all rules and provisions requiring that Ordinances be read on three different days, be dispensed with and that Ordinance Number 36.6, as read, be passed .and approved. Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea. Agenda 9 Engineering Report: Gary Smith, J -U -B Engineers, Inc. presented bills and recommended payment. Pass through charge total to $643.95. The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Williams that General Engineering Statement #3, for services January 26, 1980 through February 23, 1980 in the amount of $1,403.73 be paid. Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea. Smith requested payment of J -U -B, Inc. services during construction phase and operation phase. The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Kingsford that J -U -B Engineering Sewer Project Statement No. 30 in agreement for engineering fees to be paid on April 8, 1980 from Construction Fund. Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea. Smith reported that DVY Construction Co. had returned Change Order #5 Wastewater Treatment Facilities Construction. The total is $45,612.58. Out of that, they have already been reimbursed $19,246.70, the remainder is $26,365.88 and had been approved by Basil Tupyi as a reimbursable item. Smith stated that DVY Construction has agreed to make the repairs that have been requested on the clarifier verbally. The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Brewer to take Change Order #5, DVY Construction Co., Wastewater Treatment Facilities under advisement until the next regular meeting. Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea. The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Brewer that the meeting be adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Motion.Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea. Mayor fty Clerk U k; 1 8 4 6 6 7 8 9 10 1? 14 16 16 �_ 17 18 18 20 22 28 24 25 that Mr. Dowdle submit as -built drawing plans for the final approval of the plat. MR. CROOKSTON: Yes. MR. GLAISYER: Does that satisfy you? All those in favor. (All City Council Members voting in the affirmative.) MR. GLAISYER: All those opposed? (No response.) MR. GLAISYER: Motion carried. Thank you, Mr. Reeves. MR. REEVES: Thank you. MR. GLAISYER: Gentry Annekation, please. MR. GIBSON: My name is James Gibson, and my address is 1867 East Beacon Light Road, Edgle. May I show you a diagram which I think will explain what we're asking for. This is (indicating) Fairview. This is (indicating) a five -acre parcel and there's currently a A commercial zoning, the first 200 feet, approximately this area (indicating). Five .Mile Creek flows through the property in this configuration (indicating); separating this part (indicating) from this part (indicating). We are asking for a rezone of this approximately JOHN W. $ SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 59705 12 JOHN W. & SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s } I triangular piece of ground to the north of Five Mile Creek so fib+ 2 that this can be developed as a commercial development. $ The rest of it would be a.residential development. 4 If the Rezone is granted as recommended by the 5 Planning and Zoning, then we will approach the City with a 6 Conditional Use request detailing what you see in schematic 7 form here (indicating). 8 In other words, a commercial -- or should I say 9 professional development here (indicating). This is seen, i0 probably not as retail stores, but as a professional office Jl complex, and then separated. And across the creek a residential 12 development. g The only question that we're asking for now is a 14 rezone of this triangular piece of property so that the planning is of this can go ahead. The details of this, as I say, will be addressed in a Conditional Use Application for the whole thing. We might point out a few of the things that we have 18 tried to address as we've worked with Planning and Zoning, and lg tried to be sensitive to some of their concerns expressed. 20 One of the questions has been access to this part 21 (indicating). There's no public road around here (indicating) 2 presently. 2$ We are working with the owner of adjacent property 24 here (indicating) to create a new street; which would be an 25 extension of Fifth Street. Immediately to the side of the JOHN W. & SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 83705 fib+ 13 r. 'y 1 property here (indicating); which would provide a Means of f 2 access here (indicating). Also the owner wishes to construct a S portion of Gruber Street, I believe that's how it's pronounced, 4 Gruber Street at this location (indicating); providing an access I on three sides of the property. 6 This access is rather desirous, we understand, from �+ the Planning and Zoning standpoint. They were very anxious to have a street constructed in this direction because access to 9 quite a large parcel of ground is sort of a problem back in this V. 10 area (indicating). y7jC 11 So, we're desirous of cooperating with the owner of r t� i this property to get this street constructed. 18 In. addition, Planning and Zoning has said that they 14 wish Five Mile Creek to be developed as a Greenbelt. And we "5 wish to do that. 16 in other words, not simply tile and cover the creek, }4.., ', 17 but rather develop it into an attractive Greenbelt with a pathway 1 and with some landscaping. What you see, of course, is simply 19 a schematic. We couldn't say that we want to put paths in 20 exactly that configuration. We'd have to do the actual complete 21 design of it to be able to say that. But, in principle, that's 22 what we wish to do. 23 In addition, we see a bridge for access here (indicating) to this professional development. We see another access there (indicating) but it doesn't require a bridge, of JOHN W. & SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 83705 14 course, because the creek turns. We propose a development that has no vehicular g dead-end, shall we say. There's a way through for emergency vehicles so that they don'.t have to dead-end and turn around at any point, but simply go through. g I think that fairly outlines what we're asking for:. Again, what we're asking for.is simply a Rezone of this piece g, of property between what is presently zoned Commercial and what g is Residential; so that this could be developed. gyp; It would be almost not feasible to use this piece of property, if this (indicating) being Commercial, the creek with its 90 -foot wide Greenbelt coming through here (indicating) and this (indicating) being Residential. This parcel 14 (indicating) becomes virtually not usable unless it is rezoned in harmony with the rest of this. Also, we're pretty anxious to avoid the future '17 development of simply strip Commercial along there. So, this would allow a professional plaza which doesn't exactly front 19 right out into Fairview, but rather has an access on Fairview, ..'24 that's true, with a deceleration lane. But, the development is centered back here (indicating) within itself. MR. GLAISYER: Are there any questions regarding this? g Questions from Council? Mr. Williams. '2 MR. WILLIAMS: One of the concerns that I talked with the Idaho Transportation Department was this north -south street. a JOHN W. 8 SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'S 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 83705 15 a i 1 MR. GIBSON: Yes. r 2 MR. WILLIAMS: I personally think it's a good design, g appears to have good flow. But, concerned that that street be 4 put in, or dead -- well, be put in at the front end of the 5 project so that we would be assured of getting that street. 6 Things have a way of getting forgotten after the t 7 projects are completed. So, that would be my concern. S And what densities do they propose back here g (indicating) for this? I notice they said "36 bedroom units". 10 But, I'm not sure how many acres that is. 11 MR. GIBSON: There's presently three acres of land; which 12 is Residential. We are taking, as you see, a big part of that 13 out for the Greenbelt there. 5o, the actual building area is 14 concentrated on somewhat less than two acres. 15 However, considering the rather large amount of 16 land that's taken out for the Greenbelt, it gives us a density 17 of about 12 per acre. 1g MR. ORTON: That's under the trade -off clauses of our 19 Comprehensive Plan that you are making the high density on one 20 portion? h; 21 MR. GIBSON: Yes, that's the idea. We're concentrating 22 here (indicating) where it's possible to build, and leaving, as Ig. ; (; 28 you see, a -- the greatest portion of the property not built on. 24 It's developed as a Greenbelt, or the parking for the other area, 25 MR. GLAISYER: Mr. Kingsford. c , rt JOHN W. & SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 83705 16 r 6 7 8 9 '16 11 12 18 14 15 1s' 17 °12 18 26 . `21 22 28 il'24 2g 0 MR. KINGSFORD: You mentioned a portion of Gruber. You are not talking about a half street in the back; are you? MR. GIBSON: No. We want to build - we don't want to build half a street, but we want to build this portion of the street. MR. KINGSFORD: The full street for that distance? MR. GIBSON: When I said "a portion" I didn't want to lead you to think we're going to build miles of street, but full street for 300 feet, approximately 300 feet. MR. GLAISYER: Anything else, Grant? MR. KINGSFORD: 'No. MR. GLAISYER: Rick? MR. ORTON: No. MR. GLAISYER: Bill? MR. BREWER: My notes indicate 36 residential units. MR. GIBSON: That's correct. MR. BREWER: On two acres? MR. GIBSON: Yes. They are concentrated on two. It is somewhat less than two acres, but that's true. MR. BREWER.: And you figured that out at 12 -- MR. GIBSON: No. Originally the residential area was three acres, but we're taking so much out for the Greenbelt here that it concentrates it onto a little less than two. So, 36 divided by three is 12, and it's under this "density transfer principal" that was mentioned; that we get 12 JOHN W. & SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 83705 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 _9 10 11 12 18 14 '15 16 17 16 18 20 ' ;21 22 26 25 per acre. If we only count the area of the buildings are on, we get a considerably higher density, that's right. MR. GLAISYER: Anything else, Bill? MR. BREWER: Well, nothing other than I think that's going to be very dense. MR. GLAISYER: Mr. Williams. MR. WILLIAMS: One thing that has been noted by the Council is that 90 foot Greenbelt on Five Mile Creek is a -- I think it's Bureau of Reclamation easement anyway that they couldn't build onto anyway. MR. GIBSON: Yes. The only thing that otherwise could be done is parking on it. We wouldn't be building buildings in that area, that's true. MR. KINGSFORD: That's not what we're meeting on at this point in time anyway. We're just talking about the Rezone. MR. GLAISYER: Mr. Welker, Fire -Chief. MR. WELKER: Well, as I commented before, he seems to ha a new plan there that I haven't seen because -- MR. GIBSON: Yes, it is revised from that plan. MR. WELKER: So I had very bad feelings about the access going from this plan here (indicating) on emergency vehicle entrance and movement in there and he's talking about building Gruber just on the back end of that property. And what says when Gruber is going to go on through? I've still got a dead -e. JOHN W. & SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 83705 18 1 until Gruber goes on through to the west. 2 MR. GLAISYER: That's called good planning, Chief. g MR. WELKER: I see. 4 MR. GIBSON: That, indeed, would be a problem if it were S not for the construction of this street which, of course, goes 6 into Gruber. 7 MR. GLAISYER: Any other comments? g MR. WELKER: No. 9 MR. GLAISYER: Mr. Schoen. 10 MR. SCHOEN: No comment. 11 MR. GLAISYER: Mr. Sherwin. 12 MR. SHERWIN: I haven't seen the new revised plans, but 1g my comments, from what I hear him saying, would basically be the 14 same. 16 It's an extreme heavy concentration, probably lower 16 income. We have no provision for lighting to help us protect 17 the things in the parking lot area. We havea large concentration 18 of cars parked in something like that. Also getting onto the 19 street from the one exit. 20 MR. GLAISYER: Mr. Ward. 21 MR. WARD: Nothing. 22 MR. GLAISYER: Mr. Smith. -' 29 MR. SMITH: I assume that there will be development'plans 24 that will come in for review? This is strictly rezone. 26 MR. GIBSON: We're just asking for a rezone now. We will M1 JOHN W. & SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 83705 3 19 ix, Xk,. ask for a Conditional Use. 2 MR. SMITH: I have no comment, Mr. Mayor. g MR. GLAISYER: Mr. Crookston. 4 MR. CROOKSTON: The only thing I can say is, if you are <: going to approve it, that you approve it subject to design 6 approval, what goes on there. if you just leave it open, it 7 says Commercial, then you are open for anything. g MR. GLAISYER: Mr. Stewart. g MR. STEWART: No comment. 10 MR. GLAISYER: Mr. Gibson, you made some studies why you 11 wouldn't put commercial over there where this high density is; 12 which I would rather see. i. Yg. MR. GIBSON: Actually, our studies have consisted just 1¢ of working with the site plan, and it's pretty difficult to 15 handle a site that is, in effect, cut in two by something like 16 this. 17 Our basis for that, on a planning basis has been Yg that -- that it's physically very difficult to join the two. 19 We feel we'd be introducing, shall we say, a 20 commercial use far back here (indicating) into an otherwise 1 residential area. 22 The other reason there is an economic reason. The 3 project is much more viable as a residential and commercial 24 use. 26 Now, so long as we're talking about that, as you JOHN W. 6 SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 83705 20 Xk,. 1 probably sense from a plan like this, the, shall we say, 2 trade off costs in building two streets and a rather large 8 Greenbelt, are pretty high and if we're going to provide those 4 amenities, we have to have a pretty economically viable project; 5 including the sound base of that number of rental units and 6 about that amount of commercial rental area. 7 From that economic standpoint, it works out on that 8 basis. Whereas, it doesn't otherwise. g MR. GLAISYER: Mr. Brewer. 10 MR. BREWER: Is it not true that in order to have the 11 residential development there, we'll have to fence the creek? 12 MR. GIBSON: It would, except that it -- if it's 18 developed as a Greenbelt, we will pot have to do that. 14 The owner may wish to do it, but I think there's 15 no requirement that he do it if it is developed as a Greenbelt. 16 If it's left as a ditch like it is now, then, yes. 17 MR. BREWER: That's kind of hard to understand. 18 I think your concept you are trying to use that as 18 a park? Is that right? In your concept? 20 SMR. GIBSON: Yes. 21 MR. BREWER: But the creek would be -- well, a nuisance 22 per se as far as young children in your residential development, 28 though; is that not correct? 24 MR. GIBSON: Well, in a sense it will. However, that's 26 what the City is asking for, at least Planning and Zoning. JOHN W. & SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 63705 21 III 1 They -- we showed them a plan that showed the thing 2 covered that was not a nuisance, and they said they wanted it S open as a Greenbelt. 4 So, if we're making a nuisance where we're trying to 5 do what the City is asking us to -- 6 MR. GLAISYER: Mr. Kingsford. 7 MR. KINGSFORD: I think that concept, accepting what 8 Planning and Zoning has asked for in several places. I think 9 we ought to stick, basically, to the point of as whether to 10 rezone that. r 11 But, what exactly in number of lineal feet are you 12 talking about? How far back is -- I think we ought to be sure 1g o f . , 14 MR. GIBSON: I'd have to look at a legal description to 15 tell you that in exact terms, and I presume it's in our notes i6 here someplace; at least it was in our application. 17 Mr. Anderson, do you know anything in figures what 18 we're talking about here? 19 SMR. ANDERSON: I'm -- 20 MR. KINGSFORD: I haven't seen anything. 21 PSR. ANDERSON: As I understand it now it's zoned 22 Commercial from Fairview back 250 feet, approximately right 28 here (indicating). 24 And this is the portion starting right here 25 (indicating) and becomes Residential.. As to how much feet that JOHN W. & SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 83705 22 I is, I'm not sure myself. 2 MR. GIBSON: It would take a little bit of reading and 8 interpreting here for me to be able to tell you. 4 MR. KINGSFORD: But that is in your application, just 6 exactly what we would be approving or not approving? 6 MR. GIBSON: Yes. It refers.to it as the northern 7 boundary of the creek right-of-way; does it not? 8 MR. ANDERSON: Yes. 9 MR. GIBSON: And that creek right-of-way is spelled out. 10 MR. GLAISYER: Any comments from the Council? 11 Any comments from the public? 12 Mr. Potter: 18 MR. POTTER: Jim Potter. . 14 Yes, I've been working in conjunction with 16 Mr. Anderson and Mr. Gibson; together with some other clients 16 in coordination of a plan of that area. 17 Unfortunately, we're at the conceptual stage as we 18 are with the Planning and Zoning. We're on the informal portion 19 of the hearing. .1 20 But, the two are directly related and compatible 21 and I'd be glad to, you know, go over it briefly now and further 22 discussion later. We do believe that there's a plan that will 28 accommodate the -- some of the concerns of the Fire and Police 24 Department. 26 MR. GLAISYER: Would the Council so wish to hear that, or JOHN W. & SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise. Idaho 83708 23 _ r 1 want to delay that? 2 MR. KINGSFORD: I wouldn't. 3 MR. GLAISYER: Mr. Orton. 4 MR. ORTON: You say it's compatible, and probably not 6 much sense, if it's fully compatible until you are out of the 6 informal stage and you can speak with some definite character 7 about your development. 8 Now, are you aware of this revised plan? 9 MR. POTTER: Yes. 10 MR. ORTON: And that's compatible as the -- 11 MR. POTTER: Yes. We believe that there is a potentially 12 'better access as a second access to the property. But, 13 unfortunately, our plan is still'in the conceptual stage but, 14 hopefully, if the Council sees fit to move it beyond the 16 conceptual stage, it will progress rapidly enough that they can 16 accommodate that. 17 MR. GLAISYER: Thank you. Any other comments from the 18 public? 19 MR. ANDERSON: I might just make one with reference to 20 Gruber Street. We've talked to a couple of landowners, the.. 21 individuals Mr. I haven't personally talked to him. Someone 22 else has. 23 Mr. Shoemaker, who owns the property here 24 (indicating) and Mr. Jim Cain who owns six acres to the south of 26 our property. And they are, apparently, in accord with us; that JOHN W. L SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 83705 24 I they want to bring Gruber Street through. 2 As to how close that would -- I'm not sure how 3 close Mr. Shoemaker's property is to the existing Gruber Street, 4 but at least we've been trying to work with those people to 6 bring it closer to the existing portion. 6 MR. GLAISYER: Thank you. 7 Okay, Gentlemen, what's your decision? 8 MR. KINGSFORD: I'd move that we accept the rezone as 9 specified in their application, with design review, and 10 conditional use in whatever time they get ready to come in. 11 MR. ORTON: I'd second that Motion. 12 MR. GLAISYER: The Motion is made and seconded. 13 Mr. Williams. 14 MR. WILLIAMS: Do we want to establish any time limits 15 as to when this conditional use would be allowed; a maximum 16 length of time? 17 MR. GLAISYER: Developers have any comments to that? 18 MR. ANDERSON: Well, things are getting more tenuous 19 every day with the financing situation. I would like at least 20 a year, possibly a year and a half. 21 We would want to move ahead as soon as we can. We 22 don't want to put it off, and be back before you as soon as we 23 can. But, anticipating all theproblems that are inherent 24 in something like this now is impossible. 25 MR. GLAISYER: Mr. Orton. JOHN W. b SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 83705 25 II i JOHN W. & SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 83705 26 DIR. ORTON: I might suggest that just the last meeting 2 we gave a client two years to act on a waiver for septic tanks. 3 That might be appropriate for this gentleman on a Conditional 4 Use Permit, if Grant would be -- consider amending his motion. 5 MR. KINGSFORD: I don't have any problem with that. I 6 would amend it to include it to a two-year Conditional Use 7 Permit. 8 MR. GLAISYER: Was that seconded? 9 MR. ORTON: I'd second. 10 MR. GLAISYER: I still have another MR. WILLIAMS: Just for clarification. That would be 12 two years from the time when the Conditional Use application 13 would be automatic. 14 MR. GLAISYER: Okay. Motion made and seconded to approve 15 the design plan for the Meridian Plaza 16 MR. KINGSFORD: Rezone. 17 MR. GLAISYER: Rezone, excuse me, Commercial and to issue 18 a Conditional Use Permit within two years from today's date, 19 stipulation that the City Council and Planning and Zoning have 20 the right to all design review on the building. jtx 21 All those in favor. 22 All Council Members answered in the affirmative.) 23 MR. GLAISYER: Opposed. 24 (No audible response.) 25 MR. GLAISYER: Motion carried. Thank you, Gentlemen. JOHN W. & SUSAN G. GAMBEE, C.S.R.'s 10940 Hollandale Drive Boise, Idaho 83705 26 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ..A11ENDI.NG ANF CHANGING THE ZONING IN ..CERTAI.N .REAL PROPERn DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED IN PART OF THE E 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN, IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, TO, THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, WHICH PROPERTY IS ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to rezone -'-the fo.11cwing.described real property from "A" Residential -to "C," Commercial: GENTRY .REZONE :: - .:.. A parcel of land generally located in part of the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, in Ada County, Idaho. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO: Sectional. That the aforementioned real property, which is described as follows: A parcel of land generally located in part of the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, in Ada County, Idaho. be and the same Hereby. is rezoned from "A" RESIDENTIAL, to -"C"., COVUTZRC1A,T„• subject- to conditions of.'City Minutes dated March 3, 1980. Section '2:_ Th?•s:. ordir� nce. shall be ,in. full :Force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this day'of March, 1980. ATTEST: r'J AMBROSE, (l�Y c:lerx FITZGERALD, I CROOKSTON & MCLAM Attomays and Counselom 988 East Fhst Meridian, Idaho 93852 TelephoireBM-44t11 Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission .2. February 11, 1980 Agenda a 2 Meridian Park #2 Final Plat - E. of Linder Rd., North of Meadowview Sub. Roy Johnson was present, representing and explained that Meridian Park #1 j Final Plat was filed in 1979 and displayed a map with the layout of #1 and j #2. Changes included angles have been straightened, intersection in Barclay Court conforms with Ada County Highway District, fire hydrants, streets are 50 foot, 5 foot easement on each side, dedication of 40 foot right-of-way. 'i The Motion was made by Mitchell and seconded by Tewksbury that Meridian Park #2 Final Plat be approved as long as development plans are followed and have approval of City departments. Motion Carried: All yea. Agenda 3 Leiding - Lots 1, 2 and 3, E. 3rd and Ada St. Mr. Leiding presented a diagram and requested the approval to split Lot 2, making two good sized lots instead of three (3) 30X88 lots. The front of the house is on the remainder of their property. The Leidings wish to sell the house and 48 foot depth to their daughter. There was discussion concerning setback requirement. If lot is split, a variance would be needed for the present house for back property line. The Motion was made by Hinrichs that the Commission recommend to City Council that Mr, & Mrs. Leiding be allowed to split Lot 2, Block 3 of Bown Addition, the lot with the house to be 48X88, the other lot (3) to be 42X88, with a six foot set back on west side of house. Motion died for lack of second. I The Motion was made by.Mitchell and seconded by Tewksbury that the Leiding request for split lot #E2, Block 3 of Bown Addition be tabled until March 10, 1980. Motion CarriedL Mitchell, yea, Tewksbury, yea, Hinrichs, nay. Agenda 4 Kelly Parker Rezone from "A" to "C" Commercial - located Meridian and Ada St., Bowers First Addition, Lts.16 & 17, Block.2. Parker introduced David Jensen who read the request for commercial and put up a new steel or block building approximately 30X50. (Letter on file with these minutes) There was discussion concerning lot size. The lots are approximately 105 deep. All owners within 300 feet had been j notified by certified mail. Chairman Sharp asked for public comment. There was none. Parking area was discussed: Access to be from Ada St. and parking paved. The Motion was made by Tewksbury and seconded by Hinrichs that the Commission recommend to City Council approval of Parker Rezone of Lots 16 and 17, Block 2, Bowers First Addition from "A" Residential to "C" Commercial, with Ada St. entrance. Motion Carried: All yea. a Agenda 5 Gentry Annexation Rezone - Meridian Plaza - E. Fairview. G James Gipson, architech, presented the project and described the request to 1'dditional commercial zoning from "A" to tie into existing commercial. This s not final design, they will modify this based on input and comply with reenbelt idea by Leaving Five Mile Creek open (originally shown as tiled) BAR and Nampa -Meridian Irrigation go along with either the or open. Gipson stated that an interesting development had occured by way of adjoining property owner who wishes to develop also. This owner has a 60 foot rightr4f-way up and adjacent to Gentry property extending to Fairview providing an excellent access to all properties. eridian Planning and Zoning Commission .3. February 11, 1980 Also, they will put in Gruber St. to the south of their property. The R creek runs along the side of the proposed road, a foot bridge in center proposal, two (2) accesses, deceleration lane. Jim Potter is in the process of developing a neighborhood concept plan which ` includes this area. Sharp stated the agreement to put the street down the west side, to put in their portion of Gruber St. and that it appears to be a quality development. Hinrichs expressed desire to keep Five Mile Creek open and bicycle paths. Chairman Sharp called for comments from the public for rezone hearing. There were none. The Motion was made by Mitchell and seconded by Tewksbury to recommend approval to the City Council of Gentry Rezone Triangular parcel from "A" Residential to Commercial, the same as the front parcel, streets to be reviewed with design review. Motion Carried; All yea. lenda 6 Meridian Plaza -Gentry Annexation James Gipson stated that they desire input regarding a proposal of 36 units on 3 acres (12 units per acre) which complies with proposed density. Townhouse units, sold individually, in one development, project as a whole (Meridian Plaza) would be a good tax base, provide necessary streets, and utilities. Gipson felt the market would not support all of this property as commercial as they know it would with this kind of development. Five Mile Creek provides a natural transition. Sharp felt that putting in 5th St. and Gruber St. would be a fair trade-off for multi -family (12 unit per acre). Hinrichs agreed with Sharp and stated also, the improvement of Five Mile Creek. Mitchell felt the access plan was acceptable. There was discussion concerning the maintenance. Gipson stated he is involved as a designer in Lakewood Subdivision, PUD and Maple Hill, there are tight requirements, but they are doing well. f: Gipson stated they would come back with a formal request. 7 Meadowview #2 - Final Plat Mike Milhollin and Ken Mon -tee, developer displayed both the Preliminary Plat and the Final Plat. The Preliminary Plat had been marked for approval by Council May 29, 1979. The numbering of the 74ots and blocks has been changed since Preliminary approval by request of the County engineer so that they be consecutive with Meadowview #1. Montee stated that he had met with Dick Williams and Lot 1, Block'. 1 will be dedicated 50" right-of-way to the City for a road. This would have to be submitted before Council in writing. Montee stated that when he was before Council, the Fire Department had a comment in writing that they found nothing wrong with the Plat. Milhollin stated that modification had been made on the cul-de-sac to meet minimum lot frontages for federal funding. Also%a parcel missing along the northern boundary which was acquired through condemnation procedure in 1918. Mr. Montee and Mr. Allen paid for, but never did get this as it belongs to BOR. Approximately one and a half acres adjacent to Five Mile Creek. The BOR has roughly 140 feet right-of-way along Five Mile Creek. Milhollin stated that they had experienced difficulty finding the existing water lines there was not an easement to it. The City requested that they include the design for connecting l .. sewer system which is currently operated by a lift station. i The Motion was made by Hinrichs and seconded by Tewksbury to recommend to the City Council approval of Meadowview #2 Final Plat. RMt,nn rarrioA. nil ,.om • • ridian Planning and Zoning January 14, 1980 Meeting was called to order by Chairman Don Sharp at 8:05 P.M. Members present: Annette Hinrichs, Ken Tewksbury, Lee Mitchell, Burl Pipkin. Qthers present: Brent Barrus, Robert Rudeen, Kirk Anderson, Erin Anderson, Michael L. Milhollin, Kelly Parker, Everett Parker, James Gipson. Minutes of the previous meeting were approved as read. enda 1 Kelly Parker was present to discuss potential rezone from Residential to Commercial property located at 12 E. Ada, behind the Surge'Business. Parker stated that he thought this was a double lot size and planned a small retail store and warehouse. There was discussion. Parker will notify the City Clerk,if he desires to apply for a rezone. genda 2 Meridian Plaza - Gentry Annexation James Gipson, Architect was present to discuss the plan for the plaza located on E. Fairview. Gipson introduced the owners, Kirk and Eric Anderson. Gipson explained the proposal and displayed a layout map. Five Mile Creek runs through this property,. Their plan was to tile and landscape. The front part to be Commercial, the back part as 12 units per acre, residential, to make the transition from Commercial to high and medium density buffing. Total 36 units to approximately 3 acres. This may be built in phases, pedestrian plaza, built in fountain, with the parking around the outside. The frontage is 330, depth 660. Gipson stated that they would be most anxious to develop their share of Gruber St. The Tromburg property has not been developed next to this proposal. There was discussion pertaining to a green belt along Five Mile Creek. Their plans would have to be modified to allow bicycle paths and green belt. Gipson will contact the City Clerk for a formal application. genda 3 B&B Business Park - W. Franklin - Design Review James Gipson represented Brent Barrus in proposal of remodeling original house into an office and erecting a new Meridian Glass Co. building. Half of the building is warehouse, the other half manufacturing, (put together windows.) There would be a portion for rental, however. Gipson displayed a map and stated that there is a loading zone area,enclosed trash collection area, gate and fence for security and traffic control. Boise Cascade is at the rear and east. The access and turn around area for a fire truck was questioned. This will be confirmed with Fire Department. Landscaping was discussed. The present lawn and several bushesand trees will be maintained as much as possible. The Motion was made by Pipkin and seconded by Hinrichs that the Design Review of B&B Business Park, Meridian Glass Co., by Brent Barrus,be approved with the condition that landscaping and trees be maintained (excluding the tree in access lane preparation) and that the access area be approved by the Fire Department. Motion Carried: All yea. enda 4 Home Federal Savings & Loan Variance Robert Rudeen, Lombard Conrad, Architects and Wade Stearns were present, representing Home Federal proposal on E. 1st and Franklin Rd. The Ada County Highway District has notified the Architect that since E. 1st is an arterial for the State of Idaho, there was an additional 10' of right-of-way purchased and there is actually a 40' right-of-way which goes approximately 3 1/2 feet behind the proposed sidewalk on that street. Rudeen was present to request the front yard set back be reduced from 20' to 101. The reason being that the State owns the 10' for poles, lights, etc. The property line has moved 10' west. Everything else is exactly the same. This does meet AND and ISHD standards. AMBROSE, FITZGERALD, CROOKSTON & McLAM Attorneys and Counselors 829 East First Meridian, Idaho 83842 Telephone 8884481 NOTICE OF HEARING PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, and the laws of the State of Idaho, that a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission will be held at the City Hall in the City of Meridian, at the hour of 8:00 P.M., on February 11 ,1980, for the purpose of rezoning the following described property. Any and all persons interested shall be heard at said meeting. The following described jaroperty;to be-zonbd from "A" Residential to "C" Commercial: A parcel of band generally located in part of the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 71 Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, in Ada County, Idaho. The above legal description is generalized to provide the general location of the land. Exact legal description is on file in the City Clerk's Office and is available for inspection. DATED This 18th day of January, 1980. ty iAA