Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGateway SouthOFFICIALS LA WANA L NIEMANN, Clty Clerk. A. M. KIEBERT, Treuuror ROGER SHERWIN, Chlsf o} Police BRUCE D. STUART, Wetsr Works Supt. JOHN O. FITZOERALD, Attorney ROGER WELKER, Flro Chlsf EARL WARD, Weste Water Supt: July 11, 1980 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEI' A Good Place to Live CITY ()F MERIDIAN ?28 Meridian Street MERIDIAN, IDAHO 85642 Phone 888-4453 JOSEPH L. GLAISYER Mayor John Coo1<nell 8000 S. Cole Boise, ID 83709 ~ Dear John: ~'~, Enclosed please find photo copies of the Attorney and Engineering statements that are pass through charges to Mar-Mon Development. Please let me know if the City billing is not correct. Thank you for your help in this matter. Sincerely, ~. Q, 1 .~n/l~~xf~./ . ana COUNCILMEN RICHARD C. WILLIAMS GRANT P. KINGSFORp BILL BREWER RICHARD F. ORTON, JR. DONALD L 8HARP Chelrmsn Zonlnp d Plannlnp r •, WILLIAM S. HAYES I DAH O NANAGC~ SURVEYING AND RATING GLENN SM17H AfSISTANT NANAGCN 6UREAU, INC. BDISE, IDAHQ April 29, 1980 Mr. Joel Petty, P.K. Blakley Engineers, Inc. P. 0. Box 579 Caldwell, ID 83605 Dear Mr. Petty: 1007 W. JEFFERSON P.o. sox lose t3370t TELEPHONE 343.540] AREA COOE 208 L1;~; .; i~~0 BCgKCEY ENG~~y f fRS Your letter of April 23 regarding the water supplies for a proposed industrial subdivision in the area of Linder and Overland in Meridian is hereby acknowledged. In any grading of the fire protection facilities of a city, there are four mayor items considered: Water Supply, Fire Department, Fire Service Communications and Fire Safety Control. Of the total grading, 39% is the Water Supply. You indicated that all buildings in the industrial subdivision would be of masonry construction with the maximum building size being not more than 60,000 square feet and that the average building would be approximately 30,000 square feet. Present plans are for a 12-inch line, which reduces to a 10-inch line, to be brought into this area. It was further indicated that this would eventually be looped with a line not smaller than this. Should t11is be done there would be no change in t}ie CiCy Classification due to the water supplies for this area. It is not possible at this time to indicate when this underground should be completed. 1'liis would be determined by the growth in the subdivision. When we last graded the fire protection facilities of Meridian, our records indicate that there were 8 wells in service with a total pumping capacity of approximately 5100 GPM with 500,000 gallons of elevated storage. At the present time the adequacy of the system is considered as adequate and it is impossible at this time to indicate when a larger supply is needed; this will be determined only by the growth of the city. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us. Very truly yours, Karl K. Goble, Superintendent Public Fire Protection KKC/sf cc: Gary Smith J. U. B. Engineers, Inc. 250 S. Beechwood Street WILLIAM 5. HAYES 1007 W. JEFFERSON MIINAGEN IDAHO P.o, eox ~o9e SURVEYING AND RATING 937oi GLENN SMITH Af 5137A NT MANAGER B U READ, I N C • TELEPHONE 343-5493 AREA CODE 209 BOISE. IDAHO May 2, 1980 Mr. Joel Petty, P.E. Blakley Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 579 Caldwell, ID 83605 Dear Mr. Petty: This letter is written to clairfy my letter of April 29, 1980, to you regarding the water supplies for the proposed subdivision in the Linder-Overland area in Meridian. After our discussion this morning it was indicated that there was a misunderstanding following the above mentioned letter. It was intended to say that the proposed 12-inch line into the area would be an adequate supply line at this time and that it would be necessary to complete this loop only when the growth in the area made it necessary. Due to unknown building size, it is not possible to indicate the exact amount of water needed to satisfy the insurance requirements; however, it is felt at this time that the above mentioned system, when completed, would not result in a deterioration in the fire insurance rates. Very truly yours, ~- .. .~ , , _ ~_ Karl K. Goble, Superintendent Public Fire Protection KKG/sf cc: Gary Smith J.U.B. Engineers, Inc. 250 S. Beechwood Street Boise, ID 83705 "~~ .. I Gt~ly o~ ~J1~r~~~a~ i t h~s~ ~~~d l97 8 i s~.~.~~~d .>~ gQ ~.~kd 1918 ~ Pr~s~~ P.~~~~g o 1oc~~5 Pst~~+ io br.~,y &-d ~ t~Jia~kr Sys1~. ; S..p#ly 39 F~c ~~-~~.~ 39% Fi rc S°.ni~ce, Gw.r.ur.u.4~ laws 9 Fir'c SA~ 4cy 13 T 5 d ~ 8ucea..,c_ 'S}o.~~s~cs ®u ~S'k~N1. ~cssucc GS'psi. I~a}ers~ Ca~o-c~~..1 stop gpw. s~ooo 8~S2 ' Croy o~ rllas~d~~-..,,. g4~~~s~~s or Sys-e~w. ~i PresSu~c 6S psi. ~ p.,~ 138~~~K ~a^'~'^~.c~ ~.,1 Sb~ ~ r0OO ~P~ ~t- -BOO kc . ~1~~ ~~ ~}~~ I.2S ~.~~ S.-4~d 3.72 aJ n~ ~lE~'A]Et'T~di[]El~t'Y' ®]F ]H[]EA~,'7t']HL A~f~ ~V]E~]EA]Et1E DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENT - 801 Reserve Street - Boise, ID 83702 March 12, 1980 Mr. Joel W. Petty Blakley Engineers, Inc. Box 579 Caldwell, ID 83605 RE: Gateway South Association (Meridian) Dear Mr. Petty: I have received the engineering report and plans and specifications for the above referenced project. Generally we receive and review an engineering report prior to plan preparation so the project concept can be agreed upon before substantial costs are incurred. Therefore, this letter will address the engineering report only. Sewer It appears that the sewer size (21") is overly conservative which would result in sewage velocities of much less than the required 2 feet/ second. Some of the flow estimating criteria I question are: 1. The proposed density of 19.25 people/acre corresponds, for example, to the density of Detroit, Michigan in 1960. The 1976 Facility Plan indicates densities of primarily 0-0.5 and 5-10 equivalent residents per acre and some areas of 10 or more. 2. Flows of 150 gpcd are unusually high; flows of less than 100 are more typical and 100 gpcd is reasonably conserva- tive. As another example, the Ten States Standards uses 100 gpcd. 3. Specific comments and questions on your calculations are as follows: a) "n" values of 0.015 are too conservative. b) As you pointed out in the Report, the expected flows from commercial development is much less than from residential areas. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ~, Mr. Joel W. Petty -2- March 12, 1980 c) I don't understand the use of 4.38 cfs on the top of page III-5. d) What is the relationship of the 16" line discussed in the calculations to the total project? e) I don't understand where Q = 4.13 cfs came from on Figure S-5. As a cross-check I determined the required pipe size for the following assumptions: 400 acres, 3.5 units/acre, 300 gallon/day/unit, peaking factor of 3. A 10" line would have a reserve capacity of approximately 86% and 43% for n" factors of .010 and .013 respectively. The 1976 Facility Plan called for 15" line in the area. I fully recognize that small area population projections are very dif- ficult and subjective, but these discrepancies are very large and need to be discussed further. Please note that it is not the policy of this office to utilize larger than necessary pipe diameters to obtain flat- ter slopes. We will consider smaller pipe sizes on less than minimum slopes consistent with Section 24.32 of Recommended Standards for Sewage Works. Water How were the fire flows of 1400 gpm arrived at? As I mentioned, I have not yet begun detailed review of the plans and specifications. Enclosed are copies of checklists that I will use in the review. In particular, all sewer lines should be deep enough for service lines to be laid at 4 inch/foot and dropped in from above the pipe (unless waived in writing by the local plumbing inspector). If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, ~~~ c- 9~~ti~. Monty G. Marchus, P.E. Environmental Engineer MGM/ap Enclosure / cc: City of Meridian V ANDERSON, KAUFMAN,ANDERSON AND RINGERT CHARTERED LAWYERS EUGENE H.ANDERSON (1902-1972) ' IDAHO BUILDING AREA CODE 20B SAMUEL NAUFMAN BOISE, IDAHO 837~~ TELEPHONE 342-4591 RICHARD ANDERSON P03T OFFICE BO% 2773 WILLIAM F. RiN GERT D. GLAIR CLARK ANDREW M. HARRIN GTON JEFFREY R.CH RISTENSON JAMES P. 1(AUFMAN February 27, 1980 Joel W. Petty, P.E. Blakley Engineers, Inc. 621 South Fourth Avenue Caldwell, Idaho 83605 Re: Nampa-Meridian License Agreement (Eightmile Lateral) Dear Mr. Petty: Enclosed are duplicate originals of License Agreement for E execution by Mayor Glaisyer of City of Meridian pursuant to resolution. His signature must be notarized. I suggest you get the agreement signed as soon as possible and return both copies to me. The board of directors of Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District meets March 4, 1980 and the agreement should be received at Nampa-Meridian's offices by March 3. Yours very truly, ANDERSON, KAUFMAN, ANDERSON & RINGERT gy ~a4~~ ; Andrew M. Harrington AMH:dh Enclosures ~-~ _.-. ~ ~. LICENSE AGREEMENT ..~; x, >`~ :~< 1 ., ''' 1 :' a ,I "1 r. 1, y LICENSE AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of 1980, by and between NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, an Irrigation district organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Idaho, party of the first part, hereinafter referred to as the "District", and City of Meridian > party or parties of the second part, hereinafter referred to as the "Licensee", W I T N E S S E T H: ~" WHEREAS, the Licensee is the owner of the real property (burdened with the easement of the District hereinafter mentioned) particularly described in the "Description of Licensee's Lands" attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made apart hereof; and, ,: ~, ~~'~~ ~~ .~~'~ ~; f `; i s .1 r .~ WHEREAS, the District is the owner of the irrigation ditch or canal known as ~Eic~htmile Lateral together with ' the easement therefor, including the easement to convey irrigation water in such ditch or canal and the easement to operate, maintain and repair such ditch or canal, and includes an easement of ingress ~;, and egress for those purposes, and which ditch or canal is an integral part of the irrigation works and system of the District anC~k . which. ditch or canal and the said easements therefor cross and intersect said described real property of the Licensee as shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and, ` WHEREAS, the Licensee desires a license to alter or modify said ditch or canal, or to change the location of said ditch or _`;a. canal in its course across the lands of the Licensee in the manner hereinafter appearing. and under the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; , NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and ~~~ of the covenants, agreements and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree each with the other as follows: .f'r 1. The Licensee shall have the right to alter, modify or change the location. of said ditch or canal in the manner specified ~~' in the "Purpose of License" attached hereto as Exhibit C and by "~o this reference made apart hereof. ,J i ~' Any alteration, modifi_catic:~n or change in location of said ditch or canal by the Licensee shall be performed in accordance with the "Special Conditions" stated in Exhibit D, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereon. 2. Any facilities constructed by the Licensee in altering, ~~ modifying or changing the location of said ditch or canal shall be constructed, maintained and kept in repair and kept clean at all times, by the Licensee, and at the cost and expense of the Licensee, and the conduit therein shall be maintained and kept in repair and kept clean at-all times for the full flow of water { therein, by the Licensee, and at the cost and expense of the Licensee. i ' 3. The Licensee agrees to construct and maintain any °~ facilities constructed by the Licensee in said ditch or canal _{ pursuant to this agreement in a safe condition to the end that _°~ the ditch or canal shall not constitute a hazard to any person or persons, and to indemnify and keep indemnified the District ' from all claims for damages arising out of any hazard or negli- j Bence in the construction, operation, maintenance and repair of ''-~ said facilities or the failure of the Licensee to keep the same i in safe condition. ,:~, 4. The alteration, modification or change in location of said ditch or canal shall be accomplished by the Licensee at such times and in such seasons and in such manner so as not to interrupt "Y or interfere with the flow of irrigation water in said ditch or ,. canal, or with the delivery of irrigation water by the District to any of its landowners. S. The Licensee agrees to indemnify and keep indemnified the District from all claims of any of its landowners for damages ~ from the impairment of the flow of irrigation water in said ditch ' or canal which may be caused by said alteration, modification or '-~ change in .location of said ditch or canal, or any use or condition of any such facilities constructed by the Licensee at any time, or ~ from the impairment of the flow of irrigation water therein from ~ .1 the failure of the Licensee to maintain and keep in repair the °_, said ditch or canal and such facilities or to maintain and keep j°± .clean the conduit in said facilities for the full flow of irri- "'~ ., ; gation water through said ditch or canal and the facilities, if '+ any, constructed therein by the Licensee. i 2-am i t 6. The District reserves the right, at its option, to remove any impediment to the flow of water. through said ditch or canal and any facilities installed therein by the Licensee, and to remove any hazards to person or property which may arise by reason of the a1_fie:ration, modification or. change in location made by the L,ice.nsee, at any time, and the Licensee agrees to pay to the District, on demand, the costs which shall be reasonably expended by the District for such purposes. If the Licensee shall fail in any respect to properly maintain and repair such altered, modified or relocated portion of said ditch or canal, then the District, at its option, and without impairing or in anywise affecting its other rights and remedies hereunder, shall have the right to perform the necessary ma~.ntenance and repairs and the Licensee agrees to pay to the District, on demand, the cost or expense which shall be reasonably expended or incurred by the District for such purposes. 7. The Licensee agrees that the work performed and the materials used in altering, modifying or changing the location of said. ditch or canal, at all times shall be subject to inspection by the District and by the engineers for the. District, and that final acceptance of the construction work shall riot be made until all such work and materials shall have been expressly approved by the District. 8. The hicensee agrees that the District shall not be liable for any damages which shall occur to any plants, structures or any other improvements of any kind or nature whatsoever which the Licensee shall place, raise, construct or install on the said easement area of the District, in the reasonable exercise of the rights of the District in the course of performance of maintenance or repair of said ditch or canal. The Licensee further agrees to suspend its use of the said easement area when the use of the easement area is required by the District for maintenance or repair under this or-any other paragraph of this agreement. 9. The Licensee acknowledges that its use of its said property hereinbefore described might, either now or at some future time, cause an increase in the amount of surface water or ground water draining or wasting into said ditch or canal or some other ditch or canal of the District. The Licensee understands and agrees that it has no right to drain or waste into said facilities of the District more surface or ground water than drains or wastes from said property of the Licensee in its present state and condition. The Licensee expressly agrees that it shall not cause, suffer or permit any such additional surface or ground water to drain or waste into said facilities of the District unless the Licensee shall have (1) obtained all necessary rights of way or easements 3-am 4 M' i a» i, ..~ '°',: .~ ": ~j i ~' n ',j 'i a for they draining or wasting of such additional water and (2) created the necessary additional carrying capacity in the ditches, pipelines or otha.~r facilities through which such additional water is to be carried and (3) complied with all statutes, regulations, ordinances, and other laws regarding the discharge of drainage or waste water into surface streams, whether natural or artificial, and into aquifers or other bodies of ground water and (4) removed all pollutants, contaminants, debris and other foreign material which in any manner have been placed in or mixed with such additional water while on the said property of the Licensee, and in the event of any dispute as to the source of such pollutants, contaminants, debris or other foreign material, the burden shall be upon the Licensee to show that the pollutants, contaminants, debris or foreign material do not come from the Licensee's said property. The Licensee expressly agrees that the District shall be entitled to enforce compliance with the provisions of this paragraph by in- junction and that violation of the provisions of this paragraph shall be sufficient cause for issuance of a preliminary or permanent injunction. The right to such injunctive relief, and any other remedies set forth herein, shall be cumulative of any other remedies available to the District under the laws of the State of Idaho. If the Licensee shall cause, suffer or permit any such additional water to drain or waste into said ditch or canal or into any other facility of the District without having complied with the require- ments of this paragraph, the District shall have .the right to stop such additional water from draining or wasting into said ditch or canal or any other facility of the District, and the Licensee agrees to reimburse the District on demand for the costs and expenses expended or incurred by the District in stopping such drainage or wasting. 10. The Licensee agrees to reimburse the District for any costs and expenses incurred by the District in enforcing any of the provisions of this agreement, including reasonable attorneys' fees. 11. The parties hereto understand and agree that the District has no right to in any respect impair the uses and purposes of the irrigation works and system of the District, by this contract, nor to grant any rights in its irrigation works and system incompatible with the uses to which such irrigation works and system are devoted and dedicated and that this contract shall be at all times construed according to such principles. 12. Nothing herein contained shall be construed to impair the easement and right of way of the District in the said ditch ox' canal and all uses of said ditch or canal and the said altered, modified or changed location of said ditch or canal and the license herein provided therefor shall remain inferior and subservient to the rights of the District to the use of said ditch or canal for the transmission and delivery of irrigation water. 4-am .~ 13. In the event of the failure, refusal.or neglect of the Licensee to comply with all of the terms and conditions of this contract, then the license of the Licensee under the terms hereof may be terminated by the District, and all structures in or over said ditch or canal, and the right of way therefor, which may impede or restrict the maintenance and operation of such ditch or canal by the District with its equipment for the maintenance of its said ditch or canal may be removed by the District. =,i .~ ~:~ ~,`'. a. r f ,~ ~:~ ,.: ,,; i . ;j i `~1 >~ `# { ~; 14. The Licensee acknowledges that the license herein granted is for his or its benefit, and not for the benefit of the District, and, for that reason, the Licensee agrees to pay any attorney fees or engineering fees charged by the attorney for the District or by the engineers for the District in connection with the preparation of this License Agreement or in connection with negotiations .covering the terms and conditions of this License Agreement. 15. The word "Licensee", if used in the neuter in this agreement, includes the masculine and feminine genders, the singular number includes the plural, and the plural number includes the singular. The covenants, conditions and ayreements herein contained shall constitute covenants to run with, and running with, all of the lands of the Licensee described in said Exhibit A, and shall be binding on each of the parties hereto and on all parties and all persons claiming under them or either of them, and the advan- tages hereof shall inure to the benefit of each of the parties hereto and their respective. successors and assigns.' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the District has hereunto caused its corporate name to be subscribed by its officers first thereunto duly authorized by resolution of its Board of Directors and the Licensee has hereunto subscribed his name, or if a corporation, has hereunto caused its corporate name to be subscribed and its seal to be affixed by its officers first thereunto duly authorized by resolution of its Board of Directors, alI as of the day and year herein first above written. NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT By_ Its President ATTEST ; Its Secretary 5-am 1,~ .5 ` 1 j .i -,V ~i.+i ,':.~ t~:'}V -r~ r ~. .~ ~ -i ~< -~.~f `. >' '~ •i ~ •, i ;r ,`"J i i ~I J '~! >,~ ~:; a ., -, '~ 3~ ;~ CI By ATTEST: G ~.~..-.~-~, STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. COUNTY .OF CANYON ) On this day of , 1980, before me, the widersigned, a Notary Public in an or sai State, personally appeared WILLIAM P. BIENAPFL and JOSEPH C. VOIGHT, known to me to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of NAMPA & MERIDIAN ~.RRIGATION DISTRICT, the irrigation district that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that such irrigation district executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written.. Notary Pu ~c or t o State o I a o Residing at Nampa, Idaho ;.; ~ •~ i i .1, ~~ ;~ ~~ jjI j I ..,~ w, ',''~f$f$ Q `~ '~~ ~6 :. 7 :~ ~7~ :~ `1 >I STATE OF IDAE~iO ss. COUNTY OF ADA ) On this 28 day of February , 1980, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public n an- or said State, personally appeared Joseph L. G1 ai syer and LaWana L. Ni emann , known to me to be the Mayor and City C1 erk , respectively, of City of Meridian the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknow- ledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto 'set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. ~~~~ n~ ~~ Notary Public for th State o Idaho Residing at _ u~, Idaho. b 7-am •~ /,.~ t... ..~ ,~. .: ' fJ ;~j ~~ -; { :; d ~, F :1 1 '` ~ Y { i :,' i ~~1 `f ,i i ~~~; ,'{ „, :., ~i 0 a `:~ ~; '9 -'~ ~~d ;~,; .STRUCTVRAL D[~IGN ' BbILe ANO FOUNOATI4N INVRRTIOATION 6UAVSVINO 826 CENT[R AVC~aUB TBL. aa2.88P2 PAYETT E. IDAHO 89881 (C;har~ered) HdME OFFICE: BOX 578 G2t •3O. 4TH AVP.. - TP.L. 4a9.16t8 CALDWELL. IDAHO 89600 818 WA4HIN6TON AVENUE .TEL. 94t1.588t EMME7T, IDAHO 67617 DESCRIPTION FOR $URFACE AND GROVND WATCR ENOIN[RRINO GEOLOGICAL EN OINCHRtNG MUNICIVAL F.NO{NEERINO ROUTE NO. $, pOX f00 T6L. !88.828] ONTAR{O. GREC3ON 97914 EXISTING STREETS RIGHTS-OF-61AY INVOLVED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 12" WATER LINE FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO Job No. SC021880 February 21, 1980 The following describes the existing .Street rights-of-way to be utilized for the construction of a 12" water m~.in for the City of Meridian, Idaho by the Gateway South Association. That portion of Meridian Street that lies in Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1 West and Section 18, Township 3 NortYi, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian between the Northeast corner of ttie SFr NEq and the Southeast corner of the NE 4 of said Section 13, Tc~,n~ship 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian. Also including t~'1at portion of Waltman Lane right-of-way that lies in the Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian between the Southeast corner of the NE4 and the center of said Section 13, Township` 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian. EXHIBIT A ,, a . :j ''i NORTH .., i 7 ` n ' S ._i.._.. R ;~ ' ~ ~ ~~ - ~ ~ .. . I r ~ SECTION i :~ ' ,~ ~ _, T t=-1d'~ , ~: ~ ~i; _... ' ___ . _ , ~ iF _.._. ,~ ._ . ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~- 3 I t i i i . ~ _, ..~,,. __ _ _ _ _ _ _._-~ 3 0 ~5 5 ~ _ _._.: .~ k:_ -- - -_ ~ U ~ -_ _ _ ~ rte' t.._ ! ~~. ~ (`~ /. -'~ - ~ Y ( _ .,j ,_--~ ovFrz~_aNC Roac GATEWAY ~- ~ SOUT N -~"~ ., ~~ ~~ ~ ht: ~n:: c F~ ~~ ASSOCIATION F.,ctEr:~,~c ~, ~ - ~.__ _ -, ( :~ ~''~ SECTIOr ?q ~ C;RE'i~K ~ ~~ x :-; C i, 1 1 U t J ~ :~ 1 `~ PROJECT LOC~'~TIG^~ ~~;~ MERIDIAN, ID~f-~U ,. EXHIBIT B °a 6 :`.~ "d r s.~ .: ;' i ~, ,.. i ;~~ ~i i 'i..i ;j '~J M .~ I 1 ~~' j :2 '{ r. ,F ,S r E X ii I B I T C PURPOSE Oi'' LICEtISE The purpose of this License Agreement is to permit Licensee to replace an existing six-inch water line under Fightmile Lateral with a 12-inch water line adjacent to Meridian Street about 3/4 of a mile north of the intersection of Highcaay 69 and Overland Road in Meridian, Zdaho. ~ ~ ,s ~. ,~ { i ,a ~,~ ,4,, ,;,1 ~.; . -i ., . i ', ~, ~; ~ ,/~ ... 1 E }~ I3 I L I T D SPECIAL COPIDITZO*1S 1. Construction shall be in accordance with certain plans and drawings prepared by I3lakley Engir..eers, Inc. entitled "Gateway South Association" consisting of 19 sheets and Specifications for Gateway South Association, Water Line Extension Project, February 1980, also prepared by Blakley Enc7ineers, Inc. A set of said plans and drawings and of said specifications have been delivered by Licensee to the firm of Anderson, Itaufman, Anderson & Ringert, are retained in the offices of that firm, and by this reference are incorporated in this License Agreement. 2. The .water line shall consist of a ductile iron pipe within a 24-inch corrugated metal pipe with a 6-inch reinforced concrete cap. 3. There shall be a minimum distance of 42 inches between ..the bottom of Eightmile Lateral and the installed water line. i I I, ~~ ,~ .~~ _; :1 ,, ,a '' ~>';~ ~~';'~ f;. 4 ,; ,; 4. Construction shall be completed prior to March 15, 1980. Time is of the essence. 5. Licensee shall notify the water superintendent of. the District-prior to and immediately after construction so that he or the District's engineers may inspect and approve construction. If the District's engineers perform such inspection, Licensee shall pay to the District's engineers their fee in connection therewith. !Meridian City Hail .3. April 21, 1980 Eugene Kindred, resident, spoke to object to the canceling of twice a week service. If the service of once a week goes into affect, he felt all changes should go in at onetime. Kindred stated if the twice a week pick up is stopped, the city is throwing a penalty on the senior citizens right now, the grass season's on - t:h~is~ would be 40~ to $1.20 per month for " just once a week service.. He stated he was for giving a raise, but all the people°s expenses are going up. Kindred again stated the rate and pick up change should be done at one time. Virgil T. Phillips, resident, stated that he puts out one can and it does not hold it - there is always same left over. He had called Boise and they can put out three c~~s far. $2,50 ,per month.. K. H. Aldrich, resident, stated that he objected to paying extra times when some weeks he does no~', have even.. one can to set out.. The residents present felt the arrangement of less service and an increase in rates would be a penalty to citizens. The mayor called for comments concerning the Sanita ~y Service. There .were none.. The Motion was made by 3rewer and. seconded by Orton that the summer service be canceled from twice a week to once a week pick up and a committee be est~~:~lished and a cost analysis be presented May 5, 1980, the issue settled by that time. Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea, Orton, yea. There will be an ordinance presented May 19, 1980 implementing the mayor and Council's decision on Sanitary Service. The mayor appointed Councilman Kingsford to chairman of the Sanitary Service !i Study Committee and E'ua-gene Kindred as the senior citizens representative. Agenda ' 5 Joel Petty - Gateway South water/sewer ex*ension to Plant and Williamsen Annexation. / Petty displayed ~'rawings and explained the termination paint at the west boundary o~" ~~"~~r~-"ion pro~eriy to exWe~~d t~~ war .'ne r,~~,~;~ Over;~~r~! ~'d. to ! in~~~r and then ~,orth ~;p ! i rider to the ~"ree}~ay. .The sealer w©~' c' bore '.~rderr;eF~tn ~ he f, eeway then follow the freeway in a westerly direction to Linder, then on u~ to Over"anal Rd. The water line s~'~ing proposed to t'~e 12" down Over?and Rd. and then 10" north on ! -t rder - thi s wool d t i e i r:to i;he 1 G" on ~ rar~% 'i n Rd. The sewer 1 i ne wa~aid ~e 16" on the way to allow future development. Petty stated that the developers need to know what the city is going to require them, to construct this project, so that they can get a cost figure and design figure together before'"they get involved it it. .Williams was canc~srned about accomodating all the annexed area water pressure. without some type. of a well. Engineer Smith stated that with aline that size and that length, it could become a problem since there rvi11 be a dead-end line. The city master plan for water aistributian system is '. O" lines on a half mile oriel and shows a future well site on Linder and I-80 north side. Presently on the south side of Franklin the city has Well 9, and Well 8 in the city o~rl~. Thn flow requirement for the Plant/ Wil'°iamsen property needs to be Zooked at anz the city should work toward a loop system. ' Smith stated that as far as sewer standpoint, the ci~~y has gone as far to the southwest that they can go without a lift station situation. The participation off' other property owns;-~~~s weu~d be needed to extend the line to make a loop. An analysis on fire flow wo~~ld be critieal. Petty stated they need a plan on buildings before a fire flow study could be made. There would be a rough idea of 1,000 gpm for regular buildings, 1,200 gpm for 10" line, 12°' line would provide 1,500 gpm. The maximum for most sprinklirgsystems is 1,00 gpm. Petty agreed that the loop system is the ideal system, ridian City Hall _ 4 April 21, 1980 There was discussion concerning the fire rating and the big affect this area' s fire fl o°~° cn~~l d have on ~.:'"~e City of Meridian. Fire Chief Welker stated that tV?e rc:luirement is 1,000 gpm per hydrant for fire flow. Mayor Glaisyer instructed Engineer Smith to work with Joel Petty on analysis of adequate pressure for project and give the Council his recommendation. Benda 6 Interim .Ordinance #367 The mayor called for the Council°s decision on tie input from the public hearino held Aoril 17, 1980. There were no additional comments received since the closing of the ~~earing. Mayor Glaisyer stated that in lieu of all the problems and the input, he could see no reason why the '20 day moritorium for platting of additional residential subdivisions would put any additional burden on anybody, rand will give the city time to complete the Zoning and Development Ordinance in compliance with the Comprehensive .Plan and Housing Statue Plan of 1978. Mayo r.Gla!isyer asked at this time if the public wanted the'ordinar;ce read. in full. Developer Phil Harper so designated by raising his hand. Mayor Glaisyer read in full Ordinance #367 Entitled: AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING APED ENACTIP`.0 AN INTERI~1 EMERGENCY MORATORIUM ON NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PLATTING AND STAYING ALL ACTION Oti PE^JDING RESIDENTIAL SJBDIVISIONS. The Motion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Willaims that the rules and provisions of 50-9002 and all rules and provisions reauirinG that ordinances be read on three different days, be dispef~sed with and that Ordinance Number 367, as read, be passed and approved. Motion Carried: Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, 3rewer, yea, Orton, yea. (Ordinance #367 on file ad"-th these minutes.? Benda 7 Mayor Glaisyer presented a request by Stubblefield for an amendment to protective covenants to increase the number of townhouses ~n Franklin Square. There was discussion concerning Franklin Square - was platted and aoproved stipulatin3 certain types of homes on Certain lots.. Building Inspector Schoen stated that Stubblefield's Franklin Square plot plan, or subdivision approved, states on the plan the speci`ied use for each lot. City Engineer Smith stated that the approved density now is 6.8 units per acre. If Stubblefield increased~by 14 townhouse lots, or 28 units, would increase to 7.4 units per acre. Smith thought the Comprehensive Plan allowed 8.0 units per acre in this area. The Potion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Orton that the Stubblefield reauest to increase density in Franklin Square ':?e taken under advisement until May 5 , l 980. Motion Carried: UJilliams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea, Orton, yea. enda 8 Vern Schoen, building inspErtor, reported that ?ocky Mountain Meat Co., Ralph Simpson, 1 oca~:.=d i n Rocs ~~_rniture 4Saterbed, 30 :_. Fairview, may be processing meat. T"ey are remocl~ing for freezers and smo'~ers. Schoen had ;..formed Ross two weeks previously t`Yat they were in need of a bu,'d;nq v,ermit. There was discussion c^^~:ernirg the reauiremen'~. of hocking to the water. Water line is loca;.~ed directly°f ~n front of this build~~,g. Rick Orton wil'° check into the business of Rooky Mountain Meat Co. Meridian Ci Hall .3. The Motion was made by Kingsford and seconded by Orton that Addendum #3, Agreement for J-II-B Engineering be tabled. 5, 1980 Motion Carried; Williams, yea, Kingsford, yea, Brewer, yea, Orton, yea. Copy of Addendum #3 on file with these minutes. Agenda 4 Gateway South Association Joel Petty presented a letter from Idaho Surveying and Rating Bureau and a map showing water and sewer line extension to Mar-Mon, Williamsen-Plant properties. Petty summarized statistics on the city's system. Statistics on file with these minutes. .Petty stated that the city's water supply would be more than adequate for fire protection of the commercial and light industrial proposed. The statistics are updated, or reviewed, upon request, otherwise rated every ten years. There was discussion concerning extending the line across the interstate to service 400 acres including Meridian Greens. Cooknell pointed out that currently of all the 400 acre properties south of the freeway, only the Mar-Mon development and LDS complex are close to design specifications. He reminded the council that all have been required to have design review. Cooknell stated that they are looking for approval and direction as to how the water system will be run. The mayor stated that Meridian Greens was approved with the requirement to cross under the interstate to the east of Meridian-Kuna Rd. in 1976. There was much discussion on looping the lines back. Cooknell questioned their responsibility to develop services for property southeast of Overland. Williams stated, "these people to the east are responsible to get water and sewer lines under the interstate east of Meridian-Kuna Rd., tie up to the system, and where you two meet, which is the northwest corner of the intersection of Meridian- Kuna Rd. and Overland." Mayor Glaisyer stated the city does not have a Latecomer's Hookup Fee Ordinance and the idea that the other peeple to the east thinking they are going to hook on to them (Mar-Mon) is not going to work.- The council has no problem with what Petty and Cooknell proposed for Mar-Mon, -rilliamsen and Plant properties tonight. The people to the east of Overland are going to have to put their own system in and-make the loop. Cooknell stated that the Gateway South Association, formed from property owners south of the freeway, were led to believe that Meridian Green's lines coming straight down to Mar-Mon was an approved method. The council again determined this was never considered. The group to the east are committed as previously approved and outlined. The mayor stated again, the final plat for Meridian Greens has been approved by the city council and that includes all the water and sewer lines, that was done long before Southgate was annexed to the :city:" Kingsford stated that Meridian Greens was approved for Nine Mile Creek for sewer and straight south for water. This includes LDS, Thomas Annexation, Meridian Greens and Time for Two - everything east of Meridian-Kuna Rd. ~~ Williams stated that, if the council does approve these (Mar-Mon, Williamsen, Plant) subject. to the engineers, that the stipulation that Meridian Greens has been approved as a separate entity. and for a separate crossing, but that the city does require a tie in at the northwest corner of Meridian-Kuna Rd. and Overland, also, that we be on record that .the developers of property at the northeast corner of Linder Rd. and the interstate be required to tie in to the westerly water line of Gateway South in order to complete, ie "the loop." Williams still felt a new well should be put in because of today's prices and growth. There are no provisions for the future and the city cannot afford this. Orton felt there was sufficient water stating that on the heaviest drawing the pumps were at 1/3 of capacity. li ~r_ ~~ ' _ ~',': ,~, Yin .1+' ,' ~ :! }~av~-0~ ~. ~ _ ~ ~ ?~ f ryr+A .j~ ~ e t ~ ~ :t' ~ ~ ~• '_~~ ... •' .r ~~~ •~~,,~~ FROM: Cfty of Meridian T0: Gateway Soutf~ 728 Meridian ~~ ,~ ~Mb ~ Marmon Association ~: , , --l~rirl-ian~_I~---X33642_ __ _ .___ _._-_ ___ _ _ _ 8II(la S:-.1:a~~-~d- a ~~ Boise, ID 83709 ?moo Mater Iixtessi®n Inc rsst ~ --- _. ........y •~s ~~ G~1 ~'irOR6~ P].aAS 19$15