HomeMy WebLinkAboutCarls Jr CUP 03-017April 28, 2003
CUP 03-017
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING May 1, 2003
APPLICANT Clayton Jones ITEM NO. 15
REQUEST Public Hearing — Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a new Carl's Jr. restaurant
with drive-thru service window — north of Intersection of South Meridian Road, East Central Drive
and South Main Street
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
COMMENTS
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See attached Staff Comments
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES: See attached Comments
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: See attached Comments
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: See attached Comments
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER: Aee attached Affidavit of Posting and Letter from
Contacted: (tt t ,1�MlA� c \MAO, Date: -lig 'l // �
Nv Ao (d -0 C(C
Jones
Phone: v/ < � I,
presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
RPR -25-2003 12:10P FROM:Sanitary Services, I 206-886-5052
MA OR
Rola-n Co e
CITY COUNCIL EMBERS
Tanury dewetid
William L. M. Nary
Chr,rq McCandless
Keith Bird
-
C�rrr�ran )f '
II »Ila �
3e
TO:Meridian Clerk P:9/14
LEGAL UtPARTM F.NT
(208) 288.2499 - rax 288.2501
PARKS & RtCRCATIU\
1206 888 3579 - Fax 893-iSo i
PUBLIC WORKS
11081 898.55M -Fax 887.1297
DOILDINfi DFP,%KroENT
008) 367.2211 - Fat S87 1197
PLANNING AND ZOMNG
(208) 8&W533 - Fux 888.6854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: April 24, 2003
Transmittal Date: March 31, 2009 Hearing Date: May 1, 2003
File No.: CUP 03-017
Request: Conditional Use Permit for anew Carl's Jr. restaurant with drive-thru service
window
By: Clayton Jones
Location of Property or Project: n/o Intersection of S. Meridian Rd, E. Central Dr. and S. Main St.
David Zaremba, P/Z pVo vAR vAc, FP)
Jerry Centers, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, vAc, FP)
Keith Borup, Pa (No VAR, VAC. FP)
Robert Conde, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Cherie McCandless, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary S9NICe (No VAR. VAC, FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Partys Department
Meridian School District (rvo Fp)
Meridian Post Office (r -PRP on)y)
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian brig. District
servers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (FPiPp oily)
U.S. West (FPlPPor#)
Intermountain Gas (FPRPonly)
Bureau of Reclamation (FPA:;Ponly)
Idaho Transportation Department (No Fp)
Ada County (Annexe6an only)
Ada County Land Records (FpiPp only)
Meridian Development Corporation
Historical Preservation Commission
Your Concise Remarks:
-:1[Ilfaii�+7+tt9in���n'n/.n��
RECEIVED COMMEWS: HOLD ,9�
�] jerj (A MSCAPor a prxe AnAFdts
APR 2 8 1003 A&Ass _M 17(9-EJCca W4E„
City Of Meridian
City Clerk O DAIIO - MERIDIAN. IDAHO 83542
(20S) SRH -4133 - Fax (708) 887-6813 - Glty Clerk Of6Ct rax (708) 888.4218 - Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723
APR 25 '03 13:21 208 -BBB -5052 PAGE.09
MAYOR
ROBERT D. CORRIE
COUNCIL MEMBERS
WILLIAM L.M. NARY
KEITH BIRD
TAMMY DE WEERD
CHERIE MCCANDLESS
RURAL FIRE COMMISSIONERS
RICHARD GREENE
TERRY LEIGHTON
STEVE ELLIOTT
i
CITY OF
v�
w
IDAHO Y�
f� J"
r ixu
MERIDIAN CITY/RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT
CHIEF
KEN W. BOWERS
DEPUTY CHIEF - FIRE PREVENTION
JOSEPH SILVA
DEPUTY CHIEF - TRAINING
BILL JOHNSON
540 East Franklin Road
Meridian, 1I) 83642
(208)888-1234
Fax(208)895-0390
April 18, 2003 RECEIVED
ED
APR 18 2003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
TO: Mayor, City Council & Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Joseph Silva, Deputy Chief, Fire Prevention
SUBJECT: Carl's Junior CUP 03-017
The following will be the requirements and/or concerns to provide minimum levels of fire
protection for the proposed project:
1. All radii shall be 28' inside and 48' outside radius for all internal roads.
2. The proposed project shall have an unobstructed width of 20' available for all fire lanes..
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
MAYOR
A Good Place to Live
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
Robert D. Come
(208)466-9272•Fa 28&2501
�/,
CITYOF 15 ERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
PUBLIC WORKS
Keith Bird
33 EAST IDAHO
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Tammy deWeerd
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 887-2211 - Fa 887-1297
Cherie McCandless
(208) 888-4433 - FAX (208) 887-4813
PLANNING AND ZONING
City Clerk Office Fa (208) 888-4218
DEPARTMENT
(208) 8845533 FAX 888-6854
MEMORANDUM: HearingDate: May 1, 2003
To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission �j
From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City E eer j6 1 � RE `� (��j L —WED
Wendy Kirkpatrick, Planner u f. j APR 2 5 2003
Re: Carl Jr's (N City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
a Request for Conditional Use Permit and Planned Development for the Construction
of a 2,124 square foot drive-through fast food restaurant (Carl Jr's) in a C -G zone, by
Clayton Jones (File No.CUP-03-017).
We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the
applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by
motion of the Meridian City Council:
"mcamsWcum 10
The applicant, Clayton Jones, has requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Planned
Development for the construction of a new Carl Jr's drive-through restaurant at the comer ofMain St
and Meridian Road. The proposed restaurant would replace the existing building that used to house
the Kentucky Fried Chicken, located between the existing Taco Bell and the new A&W/KFC
restaurants.
When the new A&W/KFC restaurant received approval for their conditional use permit, one of the
conditions of approval was to abandon the drive-through use of the existing KFC building (File No.
CUP -01-021, FF/CL 12.2, pg 5) While the proposed application is for the construction of a new
building and the new drive-through will be constructed in a different location than the previous drive-
through, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council should determine whether the intent
of the condition of approval was to prohibit a second drive-through on the property.
The applicant is required to apply for a Planned Development because the proposed KFC building will
be the second structure on the subject parcel. The MCC requires a Planned Development to provide
two amenities as a part of a Planned Development. These amenities can either be two of the
amenities listed in Section 12-6-2 of the MCC or other amenities appropriate to the size and use of
the development as proposed by the applicant and approved by the Commission and Council. The
applicant has not proposed any amenities for the site. The KFC / A&W restaurant was approved by
Council before amenities were required by Planned Developments.
Staff is very concerned about the configuration of the proposed drive-through for the restaurant. The
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
May 1, 2003
Page 2
configuration requires customers of the restaurant to cross through the drive-through of the
restaurant to access the entrance to the restaurant. Putting pedestrians in the pathway of vehicles
creates a potentially dangerous situation for pedestrians.
LOCATION & SURROUNDING USES
The subject property is located near the northern corner of the intersection of Meridian Road, 1"
Street and Central Drive.
The following uses surround the subject property:
North — A Taco Bell restaurant, zoned C -G.
South—A&W/KFC restaurant, zoned C -G.
East — Central Valley Corporate Center, zoned C -G.
West — Redlin Photography Studio, zoned C -G.
STANDARDS FOR CONDTITONAL USES
The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed
conditional use in terms of the following and may approve a conditional use permit and planned
development if they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11-17-3):
A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open
spaces, parking, landscaping and other features as may be required by this Ordinance;
Staff finds that the site is not large enough to accommodate the two amenities required by
the zoning ordinance for a Planned Development. Additionally, the inadequate size of the
sight has necessitated the configuration of the drive-through which requires pedestrians to
walk through the drive-through to access the entrance of the restaurant.
The MCC (12-13-5) requires 1 parking space for each 200 square feet of restaurant floor
area. The existing building used by KFC / A&W is 2,625 sq. ft, the proposed Carl's
Junior is 2,124 sq. ft in size. Based on the square footage of the two buildings 24 spaces
are required. The applicant's site plan contains 57 spaces.
While the proposed site plan meets the parking requirements required by the zoning
ordinance, the proposed parking is likely to be inadequate for the proposed restaurant.
The MCC ordinance regulating parking requirements does not differentiate between
parking requirements for "sit down" restaurants and "fast-food" restaurants. At peak
times the parking lot on the subject property is currently filled by customers, this situation
will certainly be worsened by the addition of a new restaurant to the subject property.
TP Thn+ +hn a.nanonA ..m --A dn.minaa.oat +dna _11 6a ..dFh *h. Mor:A...n
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
May 1, 2003
Page 3
Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance;
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map) designates the property as "Old Town". Stafffinds
the proposed use is harmonious with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff finds further that the
proposed use is in compliance with the Meridian City Code.
C. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible with
other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of
the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character
of the same area;
Staff finds that the proposed use will be compatible with the other commercial and restaurant
uses found in the general vicinity of the subject property
The Council and Commission should consider public testimony when determining if the
proposed use will change the essential character of the area.
A That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will
not adversely affect other property in the vicinity;
Staff anticipates that the proposed uses may have an adverse affect on the other property in
the vicinity due to the existing traffic conditions in the subject area and the potential for the
proposed application to add to existing traffic problems
The Council and Commission should rely upon public testimony to determine if the
development will adversely affect the other properties in the vicinity.
E. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse
disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed
conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services;
Staff finds that the proposed development can be adequately served by the essential public
facilities and services listed above.
F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost
for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community;
Staff finds that the proposed use would not create additional requirements at public cost for
public facilities and service and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the
community.
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
May 1, 2003
Page 4
G. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment, and
conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or general
welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
Staff anticipates that the proposed use could potentially be detrimental to the general welfare
of the community by means of the increased traffic generated by the uses.
H. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets;
Staff finds that the proposed use could potentially create interference with traffic on the
surrounding public streets
I. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural,
scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
Staff finds that no natural or scenic feature will be lost, damaged or destroyed by issuance of
this conditional use.
SITE SPECIFIC REOUMMENTS
1. Reconfigure restaurant drive-through so that pedestrians do not cross through the drive-
through to access the entrance to the restaurant.
2. All parking and areas of circulation shall be improved with a hard surface in accordance with
MCC 11-13-4.D, and shall be installed and striped in accordance with the submitted site plan,
ADA and MCC 11-13-4.F.
Provide two amenities from the list of amenities found in section 12-6-2 of the MCC.
4. Applicant must apply for a planned sign program for the proposed sign.
5. All exterior lighting, whether attached to the building or located within the parking lot, shall
be down -shielded or otherwise altered so that the light does not spill over onto adjacent
properties or right-of-way. All parking lot lighting shall be in accordance with Ordinance 1I-
13 -4C.
6. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City
Zoning and Development Ordinance. All signage is subject to design review and shall require
separate permits. Temporary or portable signs shall be prohibited, and shall be removed upon
3 days notice to the applicant.
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
May 1, 2003
Page 5
All construction and site improvements shall conform to the requirements of the Americans
with Disabilities Act.
8. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and
shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas.
Storm water treatment and disposal must be designed in accordance with Department of
Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of Stone Water Best Management Practices
for Idaho Cities and Counties and City of Meridian standards and policies. Off --site disposal
into a surface water is prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority over the receiving
stream provides written authorization prior to development plan approval. The applicant is
responsible for filing all necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water
Resources regarding Shallow Injection Wells.
9. Trash: The trash enclosure shall be enclosed on at least 3 sides by a solid wall or sight
obscuring fence at least four feet in height in accordance with Ordinance 11-12-1C.
Coordinate location and construction requirements with Sanitary Services, Inc.
10. Certificate of Occupancy: All required improvements must be complete prior to obtaining a
Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed development. A temporary Certificate of
Occupancy may be obtained by providing surety to the City in the form of a letter of credit or
cash in the amount of 1101/6 of the cost of the required improvements (including paving,
striping, landscaping, and irrigation). A bid must accompany any request for temporary
occupancy. Any temporary occupancy will not exceed 60 days to complete the required
improvements.
11. Water and sewer service locations to serve this proposed building were not shown on the
submitted site plan. The designer shall furnish the Public Works Department a new site plan
showing existing and proposed utility mains and service connection.
12. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and a Building Permit shall be obtained prior to the start
of construction.
Staff recommends approving the proposed application if the configuration of the drive-through is
modified so that pedestrians do not cross through the drive-through to access the restaurant and two
amenities are provided for the Planned Development. If these modifications are not made staff
recommends denying the proposed application.
Posted Property Affidavit for CUP
The property that intersects Meridian Road and I' street also known as Old
KFC building, submitted on the behalf of Greenstar Foods for the purpose of
constructing a Carl's Jr. restaurant was posted with a notice of public
hearing on April 22, 2003 for the hearing date of May l' 2003.
See Attached.
3'av mod 3
ate
Y N MAMA,0Q
TARP `
Notary
OF 1&P '
rrrrrit�»'
rol
RECEIVED
APR 2 4 2003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
04/23/2003 15:45 FAX 2088886854
Cari'se7�re
Cole R& Y 125
Meridian P&Z Commission
600 E Watertower Ln. Suite 202
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Carl's Jr.la Street Project.
Dear Commissioners,
MERIDIAN P&Z DEPT. + City Clerk 10001
RF0ErVED
APR 2 3 2003
A Franchisee of Carl Karcher Enterprises`•, Inc.
RECEIVED
APR 2 3 2003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk office
Greenstar Foods would like to thank the property owner and the other tenants on the site for taking the time to
meet with the landlord or Greenstar Foods regarding this project. We have taken care to take into consideration
comments made by the city counsel and all involved regarding the project. You will notice many changes from
the project we fM introduced for consideration:
• Building size 2000 square feet (reduced from 4000)
• 46 seats (reduced from 100)
• Removal of Playground
• Increased parking to 57 spaces while decreasing the number needed per seating (in addition to the 60
spaces available to Taco Bell and Bolos)
• Added Parking close to KFC while maintaining 27' isle way
• Completely eliminated the congestion from the KFC drive tbru by separating our drive thru and stack
from any isle way
• We propose a to enclose our drive tbru with a handrail which would eliminate multiple pedestrian
crossing points through the drive lane
We would like to thank the commission on their approval of the project as last submitted. However, we have
incorporated -many of the comrnents of the City Counsel and the other tenants in the shopping center to make the -
project better and more equitable for all. Now that Carl's Jr. has substantially decreased its seating capacity and
at the same time increased parking, these steps will help the parking situation for KFC while providing adequate
parking for Carl's Jr., as well as better flow in the center. We look forward to presenting our new and improved
project May 1' to the commission for approval.
Sincerely, a a . nayton Jon
April 16, 2 3
C: Meridian P&Z, Meridian City Counsel, Jonathon Gibbs, John Nelson, BRS Architects
APR 23 103 15:52 2088886854 PAGE.01
Meridien P&Z Commission
600 E Watertower Ln. Suite 202
Meridian, ID 63642
RE: Carl's Jr -l' Street Project.
]Dear Commissioners,
RECEIVED
APR 2 2 2003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
A Franchisee of Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc.
Greenstar Foods would hike to bank the property owner and the other tenants on the situ for tailing the time to
meet with the landlord or Greenstar Foods regarding this project. We have taken care to take into consideration
comments made by the city counsel and all involved regarding the project. You will notice many changes from
the project we fast introduced for consideration:
• BuOding size 2000 square fxt (reduced from 4000)
• 46 seats (reduced from 100)
• Removal of Playground
• increased parking to 57 spaces while decreasing the number needed per seating (in addition to the 60
spaces available to Two Bell and Bolos)
• Added Parking close to KFC while maintaining 27' isle way
• Completely eliminated the congestion from the KFC drive thm by separating our drive thru and stack
from any isle way
• We propose a to enclose our drive tbru with a handrail which would eliminate muhiple pedestrian
crossing ponds through the drive lane
We would hire to thank the commission on their approval of the project as last submitted. However, we have
incorporated many of the comments of the City Counsel and the other tenants in the shopping ceder to make the
project better and more equitable for s0. Now that Carrs Jr. has substantially decreased its seating capacity and
at the same time increased parking, these steps will help the parking situation for KFC wh0e providing adequate
parldng for Carl's Jr., as well as better flow in the center. We look forward to presenting our new and improved
project May 1' to the commission for approval
Sincerely,
on Jo
April 16, 2003
C: Meridian P&Z, Meridian City Counsel, Jonathon Gibbs, John Nelson, BRS Architects
V
Ci81�� A Franohisee of Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc.
Chem 34rFoo& LLC• 3413 N. Cab RQ 0129 aei,eli tot3709. 17me(20519364037• Fu(2N)933-2044 •emadCahBaheavmaom
Bolos Pub & Eatery
Brad Bollcek
601 E. 1
Meridiaq ID 83642
RE: Meeting regarding Carl's Jr.1 • Street Project.
Dear Mr. ,
Thank you for your support regarding this project. We have taken care to take into consideration comments
made by the city counsel, KFC, and Taco Bell regarding this project. You will notice many changes from the
project we first introduced for consideration:
• Building sine 2000 square feet (reduced from 4000)
• 46 seats (reduced from 100)
• Removal of Playground
• Increased parking to 37 spaces while decreasing the number needed per seating (in addition to the 60
spaces available to Taco Bell and Bolos)
• Added Parking close to KFC while maintaining 27' isle way
• Completely eliminated the congestion from KCF drive thru by separating our drive than and stack from
any we way
• We propose a to enclose our drive thru with a ]handrail which would eliminate multiple pedestrian
crossing points through the drive ]ane
Now that Carl's Jr. has substantially decreased its seating capacity and at the same time increased parking, these
steps will help the parking situation for KFC while providing adequate parking for Carl's Jr. and not inhibit your
site in any way.
Again, we thank you for your support to Mr. Gibbs and Carl's Jr. regarding this project.
Sincerely,
Clayton Jo
April 16, 2003
C: Meridian P&Z Meridian, City Counsel, Jonathon Gibbs, John Nelson, BRS Architects
v
CSi�"8ei�
Es -O -En Corp
Carl Nioolayseu
3475 E. Franklin Rd.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Meeting regarding Carl's Jr.l' Street Project.
Dear Mr. N-volaysen,
A Franchisee of Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc.
Thank you for taking the time to meet with Mr. Gibbs regarding this project. We have taken care to take into
consideration comments made by the city counsel, KFC, and yourselves regarding this project. You will notice
many changes from the project we first introduced for consideration:
• Bwld m>g size 20M square Beet (reduced from 4000)
• 46 seats (reduced from 100)
• Removal of Playground
• Increased parking to 57 spaces while decreasing the number needed per seating (in addition to the 60
spaces available to Two Bell and Bolos)
• Added Parking close to KFC while maintaining 27' isle way
• Completely eliminated the congestion from KFC drive thin by separating our drive tbru and stack from
any isle way
• We propose a to enckmse our drive thru with a handrail which would eliminate multiple pedestrian
crossing points through the drive lane
We would like to thank you S>r your comments, as you can see we have incorporated many into the plan. While-
we
hilewe understand you would rather have nothing next to you, we feel this project as redesigned would help the flow
of the center. Now that Carl's Jr. has substantially decreased its seating capacity and at the some time increased
1arkm& these steps will help the parking situation for KFC while providing adequate parking for Carl's Jr. and
not inhibit your site in any way.
Again, we understand you are opposed to another restaurant on this site. Because of downsizing the project and
reduction of daily trips and customer counts to Carl's Jr. while improving traffic flow and Perkin& we ask for
your support on our new project.
Sincerely,
Clayw�9t---34
April 16, 2003
C: Meridian P&Z Meridian, City Counsel, Jonathon Gibbs, John Nelson, BRS Architects
v
9i ?,
A Franchisee of Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc.
[sa,wexaa,e,1.ir• UIS N.C&RL4128Beim MeMS3704•PEowDN)938.40l7•FMOOSMI-M4•®oa nom
WagstaffManagement Co.
Denman Wagstaff
P.O. Box 1778
Hanford, CA 93232
RE: Meeting regarding Carl's Jr.lot Street Project.
Dear Nk. Wagsta$
Thank you for taking the time to meet with us regarding this project. We have taken care to take into
consideration comments made by the city counsel and yourselves regarding this project. You wll notice many
changes from the project we first introduced for consideration:
•
Build iog size 2000 square feet (reduced font 4000)
• 46 seats (reduced from 100)
• Removal of Playground
• Increased parking to 57 speces wble decreasing the n mAw needed per seating (ia addition to the 60
spaces available to Taco Bell and Bolos)
• Added Parking close to RFC while maintaining 27' isle way
• Completely elimwated the congestion from your drive thra by separating our drive thru and stack from
any we way
• We propose a to enclose our drive tbru with a handrail which would eliminate muf 4dc pedestrian
crossing points through the drive lane
We would like to thank you for your comments, as you can see we have incorporated many into the plea. While
we understand you would rather have nothing next to you, we feel this project as redesigned with your
comments would help the flow of the center. Now that Carl's Jr. hes sabstantially decreased its seating capacity
and at the some time increased parking, these steps will help the parking situation for your restaurant white
providing adequate parking for Carl's Jr.
Again, we understand you are opposed to another restaurant on this site. Because of downsiting the project and
reduction of daily trips and customer counts to Carl's Jr. while improving traffic flow and parking, we ask for
your support on our now project.
Since ly,
Clayto/n Ior
April 16, 2003
C: Meridian P&Z, Meridian City Counsel, Jonathon Mbs, John Nelson, BRS Architects
4AC�Ada
County Highway District
Sherry P. Huber, President
318 East 37th Street
Susan S. Eastlake 1st Vice President
Garden City ID 83714-6499
Dave Bivens, 2nd Vice President
Phone (208) 387.6100
John S. Franden, Commissioner
FAX (208) 387.6391
David E. Wynkoop, Commissioner
E-mail: tellus®ACHD.ada.id.us
April 10, 2003
RECEIVED
TO: Clayton Jones
3413 N. Cole Road, Suite 128
APR 14 2003
Boise, Idaho 83704
City of Meridian
SUBJECT: MCUP03-017
City Clerk Office
Carl's Jr. Restaurantwith-drive-thru
655 East 1st Street
On June 27, 2001, July 18, 2001 and August 1, 2001 the Ada County Highway District Commissioners acted
on MCUPOI-021/Modified. The conditions and requirements also apply to MCUP03-017.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office at (208) 387-6170.
Sincerely,
De el pm Analyst
Right-of-way & Development Services
Planning Division
Cc: Planning & Development/Project File
Planning & Development Services: City of Meridian
Construction Services
Drainage/Utilities
G & H Enterprises II
P.O. Box 190008
Boise, Idaho 83719
BRS Architects
1010 S. Allante Place, Suite 100
Boise, Idaho 83706
W
O
O
3
it
W
CDO
P1I
N
r
Ch
C.
X
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
Planning and Development Division
Development Application Report
MCUPOI-021 677 East First Street Drive-thru Restaurant
Modified
This application has been referred to ACHD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. The
applicant is requesting conditionaI use approval to constrtt a drive-thru restaurant. This proposed_-
development is located on the comer of Meridian Road and East V Street. This development is
estimated to generate 1,786 additional vehicle trips per day (1,488 existing) based on the Institute of
Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual.
Roads impacted by this development: Meridian Road
East V Street
ACHD Commission Date — July 18, 2001 — 12:00 p.m.
Facts and Findings:
A. General Information
Owner — G & H Enterprises II
Applicant —G & H Enterprises 1I -Jonathan Gibbs -Partner
C -G -Existing zoning
1.228- Acres
1- Proposed building lots
165- Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ)
West Ada- Impact Fee Service Area
Meridian- Impact Fee Assessment District
MCUP01-021.cm11
Pile 1
Meridian Road
Minor arterial with bike lane designation
Traffic count on Meridian Road north of 1-84 was 38,035 on 5-16-00
"F" -Existing Level of Service
"F" -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service
370 -feet of frontage
60 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline)
96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline)
Meridian Road is improved with 2 -traffic lanes, with 8 -foot sidewalk adjacent to the site.
East I` Street -
Minor arterial with bike lane designation
Traffic count on East I" Street north of Central Drive was 22,039 on 6-2-99.
Better than "C" -Existing Level of Service
Better than "C" --Existing plus project build -out Level of Service
325 -feet of frontage
85 -feet existing right-of-way (60 -feet from centerline)
No additional right-of-way required
East I" Street is improved with 5 -traffic lanes, with no curb, gutter or sidewalk.
B. On June 11, 2001, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated
the transportation system in the vicinity. On June 15, 2001, the staff met as the District's
Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the
District's transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and
Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements.
C. For the purposes of estimating daily trip generation and assessing impact fees for this project, the
proposed use of this development has been classified as Fast Food Restaurant with drive-thru
window. (Per the ITE Manual) The impact fee rate from the fee tables for this use is $6,108 per
thousand square feet of gross building area, based on the impact fee ordinance in effect at this
time. Note: This rate is provided for informational purposes only and shall not be
construed as an impact fee rate certification. The impact fee will be assessed at the time of
plans acceptance by District staff, and shall be based on the fee tables and provisions of the
District's Impact Fee Ordinance in effect at that time.
D. The Meridian Road and East 1" Street intersection is currently in the ACHD Five -Year Work
Program for reconstruction in the fiscal year 2002.
E. The applicant should be required to construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road
and East 1" Street located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and
elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. if the sidewalk meanders outside of the right-of-
way, the applicant should provide an easement for the sidewalk.
NICUP01-021.cnun
Pace 2
F. The applicant is proposing to utilize an existing shared driveway on Meridian Road at the north
property line. This driveway is located approximately 330 -feet north of East 1" Street. This
driveway meets District policy and should be approved with this application.
G. The applicant is proposing to close the existing driveway on Meridian Road located
approximately 160 -feet north of East 1" Street. The applicant is proposing to construct a new
driveway on Meridian Road approximately 190 -feet north of East 1" Street. District policy
requires driveways to offset controlled intersection a minimum of 440 -feet for a full access
driveway and 220 -feet for a right-in/right-out driveway. This driveway does not meet District
policy and should not be approved with this application.
H. The applicant is proposing to utilize an existing shared driveway on East 1" Street located on the
north property line approximately 300 -feet north of oidian Road. Because this driveway--
serves
rivewayserves several parcels, it should be approved with this application.
1. The applicant should replace unused curb cuts on Meridian Road and East 1" Street with
standard curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements.
J. The applicant should replace any damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on Meridian Road and
East 1" Street with new curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements.
Segments to be replaced shall be determined by ACHD Construction Services staff. Contact
Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details.
K. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being
tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, the applicant should be required to
pave the driveways their full width and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement
of Meridian Road and East I" Street and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii abutting the
existing roadway edge.
L. The applicant should provide a recorded cross access easement among the parcels to the north for
access to the public streets.
M. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing
by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details.
N. Any existing irrigation facilities should be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
O. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site should be
bome by the developer. y
P. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates
that the transportation system will be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by
this proposed development with the requirements outlined within this report and once the East I".
Street and Meridian Road intersection has been reconstructed.
The following requirements are provided as conditions for approval:
MCUPOI-021.cmm
Paue _
Site Specific Requirements:
Dedicate 40 -feet of right-of-way fi-ont the centerline of Meridian Road abutting the parcel by
means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to
issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to
30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material.
The owner will be paid the fair market value of the right-of-way dedicated which is an addition
to existing ACHD right-of-way if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee
administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance
#193. The right-of-way purchase agreement must be completed and signed by the applicant
prior to scheduling the.fsnal pJat forsignature by t�r ACHD Commission.
2. Road Trust for a 5 -foot wide detached concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road and East 1" Street
located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the
sidewalk with District staff. If the sidewalk meanders outside of the right-of-way, provide an
easement for the sidewalk.
3. The existing shared driveway on Meridian Road located approximately 330 -feet north of East
V Street is approved with this application.
4. Close the existing driveway on Meridian Road located approximately 160 -feet north of East 1 s`
Street, as proposed.
The applicant is proposing to relocate the driveway on Meridian Road approximately 190 -feet
north of East V Street. District policy requires driveways to offset controlled intersection a
minimum of 440 -feet for a full access driveway and 220 -feet for a right-in/right-out driveway.
Because the proposed driveway does not meet District policy, it is NOT approved with this
application.
The existing shared driveway on East 1" Street located at the north property line approximately
300 -feet north of Meridian Road is approved with this application.
6. Replace unused curb cuts on Meridian Road and East V Street with standard curb, gutter and/or
concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements.
Replace any damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on Meridian Road and East 1" Street with
new curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. Segments to be
replaced shall be determined by ACHD Construction Services staff. Contact Construction
Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details.
S. Pave the driveways their full width of and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of
pavement of Meridian Road and East 1" Street and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii
abutting the existing roadway edge.
N1CUP01-021.cmm
Peee 4
9. Provide a recorded cross access easement among the parcels to the north for access to the public
streets.
10. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in
writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for
details.
11. Any existing irrigation facilities should be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
12. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site should be
borne by the developer.
13. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel
access to Meridian Road and East I" Street is prohibited.
Standard Requirements:
A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein
shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request
shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation
of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The written
request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for
ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the
Commission on the next available meeting agenda.
Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action
do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and
report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those
items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission.
After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action
shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the
action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall
specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of
the Commission at th
The request
for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the
Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified
of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard.
Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in
accordance with Ordinance 9193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact
Fee Ordinance.
All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District
Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services
MCU1101-021.cmni
Pace ;
procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An
engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit
(or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way.
Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to
-_ __ -AMR- The applieantshall-be-rcquired-to -call- DIG1 IN (1 -800342J585) -at -least two full_.__
business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact
ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are
compromised during any phase of construction.
8. No change in the terns and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing
and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized
representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to
obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans,
or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in
interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject
property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant
to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought.
Conclusion of Law:
ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity
impacted by the proposed development.
Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development
Division at 387-6170.
Submitted by:
Planning and Development Staff
Commission Action:
June 27. 2001 /August 1. 2001
M CU P01-021.cnmi
Posse 6
0CENTRAL CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
DISTRICT
HEALTH Environmental Health DisianrEIVED
DEPARTMENT
APR - 4 2003
Rezone #
Conditional Use #
Preliminary / Final / Short Plat
❑ 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal.
❑ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal.
Return to:
❑ Boise
❑ Eagle
rden City
'than
❑ Kuna
❑ ACZ
❑ Star
❑ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal.
❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment.
❑ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of:
❑ high seasonal ground water ❑ waste flow characteristics
❑ or bedrock from original grade ❑ other
❑ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or
surface waters.
❑ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and
water availability.
❑ 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water well
❑ interim sewage ❑ central water
❑ individual sewage ❑ individual water
❑ 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare,
Division of Environmental Quality:
❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water
❑ sewage dry lines ❑ central water
❑ 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
❑ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
❑ 12. If restroom facilities are to be Installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State
Sewage Regulations.
`�13. We will re ire plans be submitted for a plan review for any:
XI
ood establishment ❑ swimming pools or spas ❑ child care center
everage establishment ❑ grocery store
❑ 14.
Review Sheet
COHD9/00lkc
04/30/2003 09:52 FAX 2088866854 MERIDIAN P&Z DEPT
APR -30-2003 09:32 ERS PRCHITECTS
ARCHITECTS
1010 S. AUANU PL. SUrrE 796
DOBE. IDAHO 83109
TELEPHOME ma 336 8370
PAX 369736 8380
FAX MEMO
Ya Meridian Planning I IN IV
Affm Wendy
From: BRS
Re: CARL'S JR. MERIDIAN
#02044.02
Wendy:
City Clerk ¢0001
P.01iO4
RECEIVED
APR 3 0 2003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Daft 04/30/03
Piz M4g.
M a9 1 , 2003
item N0. 15
Per our discussions of last week please review the attached "revised" site plan and
let us know your thoughts ... do you need full size sheets prior to or for the hearfng?
Please let us know.
Thank You in advance!
cc: CJ(Clayton)
o, v e page 1
APR 30 '03 09:59 2089986854 PAGE.01
04/30/2003 09:52 PAX 2088888854 MERIDIAN P&Z DEPT
RPR -30-2003 09:32 BRS ARCHITECTS
0
r
RPR 30 103 09:59
S
o;'010M
a
i3
+ City Clerk
4P002
P.02iO4
O:L
1
1
1I
Yn;ry.7M
\ J I
RPR 30 103 09:59
S
o;'010M
a
i3
+ City Clerk
4P002
P.02iO4
1 1 I I
�
1
1
1I
\ J I
1
1
1
IOI
N fL
I
1
I
1
I
1
1
I
BRHPLUI�,$_CBslsdc. (J.Jr
' • ��rV'� v, •E�1111.��
,e�vo.n �aem °pi��we i Vau'uw
�ecwrtgo.o
2088886854 PAGE.02
04/30/2003 09:52 FAX 2088888854 MERIDIAN P&Z DEPT. + City Clerk 10003
PPR -30-2003 09:33 BRS PRCHITECTS P.03/04
•f41 �_ �= r 6415
�1 h
VI
RPR 30 103 10:00
114
50 41 I 41 v e m 4 r m o s= In
J
m
r
C� • V]
\
2088886854
PAGE. 03
04/30/2003 09:59 FAX 2088886854 MERIDIAN P&Z DEPT. + City Clerk IM 004
APR -30-2003 0933 HRS ARCHITECTS P.04iO4
JUN
r
w
Q Q Q Q
ca 0 9 s
$ m P 0
TOTAL P.04
RPR 30 103 10:00 20Be886854 PRGE.04
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
DATE May 1, 2003 ITEM #
PROJECT NUMBER CUP 03-017
PROJECT NAME Carl's Jr. Restaurant
15
NAME PLEASE PRINT) FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL
MAI
CITY OF