Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBowers 1st Addition Project FileOFFICIALS JACK NIEMANN, City Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney EARL WARD, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, City Engineer HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN October 2, 1990 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone 888-4433 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor To Whom It May Concern: COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA J. E. BERT MYERS ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON The City of Meridian would issue a building permit for a new single family dwelling on the East h of Lot #17 and Lot #18, Block 5 of the Bowers Addition, this split would make a forty five (45) foot frontage on the existing residence as well as a forty five (45) foot frontage on the new dwelling. The issuance of this permit would be contingent upon the building meeting the required set- backs of the City of Meridian as well as connecting the unit to the City water and sewer system. Ci y Cle k & Zo ing dminstrator C' y of Meridian, ID. 83642 To: George Carey Co, Commercial Brokerage 1755 Westgate Dr. Boise, Id 83704 Re: Viking Automatic Sprinkle Co. 32 E. Bower St, Meridian. West end Rental of building on corner of Bower St. and Meridian. Dear Sir: that the City of Meridian has a occupancy attention it was brought to my lding on the corner of Bower St. and violation in the west portion of the bui Meridian road, which was formerly Meridian Glass. Meridian in now under 1979 addition of the Uniform Building Code, and Merid Code 1981 Addition. Uniform Fire Code. Meridian is also under 101 Life Code, Section 307 (a) Under Uniform Building and no change "No building or structure shall if used or occupied, or structure in the existing occupancy classification of a buildingor has or portion thereoshall and issedaaebuilding until the certificate of Occupancy"' ' made an inspection my inspection on November 24, 1981- The business had moved in prior to of occupancy is in violation of the Codes On my inspection I found their. type and Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Listed below are some of the findings: 1) Gas flame furnace in working area 2) Lights, wall switches, -and plugin do not meet Electric Codes. 3) Compressor does not meet Codes 4) Outside wall next to streets would have to be of block construction for fire protection. d also the business 5) Wall between this occupancy and office an to the east do not meet Fire Code requirements ting system: Chapter 9, Fire Code, 6) Dust collec • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live COUNCILMEN RICHARD C. WILLIAMS CITY OF M ERIDI AN GRANT P.KINGSFORD BILL BREWER OFFICIALS NIEMANN, CRY Clerk 728 Meridian Street RICHARD F.ORTON, JR- LAWANA L. A. M. KIESERT, TreasurerDONALD RICHARD D. NICHOLS, Chlet ot,Police , ks Supt. MERIDIN, IDAHO L. SHARP Chairman Zoning 6 Planning JBRUCE 0 OHN O. FSTZOERAW, Attoater m eY WELKER, Fire Chief phone 868.4433 ROGER EARL WARD, waste water Supt. JOSEPH L. OL,AISYER Mayor November 251 1981 To: George Carey Co, Commercial Brokerage 1755 Westgate Dr. Boise, Id 83704 Re: Viking Automatic Sprinkle Co. 32 E. Bower St, Meridian. West end Rental of building on corner of Bower St. and Meridian. Dear Sir: that the City of Meridian has a occupancy attention it was brought to my lding on the corner of Bower St. and violation in the west portion of the bui Meridian road, which was formerly Meridian Glass. Meridian in now under 1979 addition of the Uniform Building Code, and Merid Code 1981 Addition. Uniform Fire Code. Meridian is also under 101 Life Code, Section 307 (a) Under Uniform Building and no change "No building or structure shall if used or occupied, or structure in the existing occupancy classification of a buildingor has or portion thereoshall and issedaaebuilding until the certificate of Occupancy"' ' made an inspection my inspection on November 24, 1981- The business had moved in prior to of occupancy is in violation of the Codes On my inspection I found their. type and Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Listed below are some of the findings: 1) Gas flame furnace in working area 2) Lights, wall switches, -and plugin do not meet Electric Codes. 3) Compressor does not meet Codes 4) Outside wall next to streets would have to be of block construction for fire protection. d also the business 5) Wall between this occupancy and office an to the east do not meet Fire Code requirements ting system: Chapter 9, Fire Code, 6) Dust collec HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS CITY ®F MERIDIAN LAWANA L NIEMANN, City Clerk lLJ L � A. M. KI EBERT, Treasurer 728 Meridian Street RICHARD D. NICHOLS, Chief of Police BRUCE D. STUART, Waterworks Supt. MERIDIAN, IDAHO JOHN O. FITZGERALD, Attorney ROGER WELKER, Fire Chief 83642 EARL WARD, Waste Water Supt. Phone 888.9433 JOSEPH L. GLAISYER Mayor May 19, 1981 Walter Bruton 305 E. 2nd Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Mr. Bruton: It has been brought to our attention that you are conducting a small business at your residence. The City of Meridian requests that you cease COUNCILMEN RICHARD C. WILLIAMS GRANT P. KINGSFORD BILL BREWER RICHARD F. ORTON, JR. DONALD L SHARP Chairman Zoning & Planning business at 305 East 2nd Street and apply for a Conditional Use Permit. You may contact the City Clerk for application papers and a Public Hearing will be set up. Please call for any information you may need and we will be happy to help you in this matter. For the Mayor and City Council, ana L. Niemann City Clerk pc: Mayor and City Council File Bowers First Addition 'eridian City Hall .2. August 18, 1980 genda 3 Warren Shepard - Meridian Boats Shepard stated that he has sold his business of Meridian Boats and no longer owns the building at 331 E. 1st St. He was before the Council to report the problem of the washing of boats, plus the rainy season, there has been puddling with no walk- way. Shepard stated that his sewer charge has had a 1,500% increase and contended this was not justified with only one.toilet and two employees. There was much discussion concerning an adjustment of Meridian Boats sewer charge. Williams stated that he appreciated both the city's and Shepard's position and that there will have to be changes made before that building can be used again. The drainage problem would be the ACHD and State Highway's -responsibility. Williams recommended the minimum residential rate per month for 11 months to settle the bill, but that is not a question for the next owner because the building will have to be brought up to code. He questioned the building inspector if this was correct. Building inspector agreed. The Motion was made by Orton and seconded by Kingsford to adjust the Meridian Boats sewer charge for 11 months to the minimum residential rate totaling $48.40. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. genda 4 Mayor Glaisyer appo inted Ernst & Whinney CPA, as City Auditor for the fiscal year of 1980-1981; estimated fee $5,200 to $6,200. The Motion was made by Williams and seconded by Kingsford to approve Ernst & Whinney CPA, as the City Auditor for the fiscal ,year of 1980-1981. Motion Carried: Williams, yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton nay. genda 5 The mayor read Resolution #74 entitled: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN ESTIMATE OF THE EXPENSES FOR ALL PURPOSES FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 1980, AND ENDING THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1981, AND GIVING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PRIOR TO THE PASSAGE OF THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATION BILL. Mayor Glaisyer called for public comment at this time. There was none. The Motion was made by Brewer and seconded by Kingsford that the rules and provisions of 50-9002 and all rules and provisions requiring that Resolutions be read on three different days, be dispensed with and that Resolution Number 74, as read, be passed and approved. Motion Carried: Williams,yea; Kingsford, yea; Brewer, yea; Orton, yea. tigenda 6 Larry Ripley - Sewer District Ripley who is a member of Elam & Burke Law Firm explained his presence, by invitation of Jim Potter, to outline the advantages and disadvantages of a sewer district pro- viding part of an effluent service for Meridian and surrounding area. His firm represents the N/W Sewer District in Boise, and the West Boise Sewer District. He has also assisted other entities throughout the State of Idaho in exploring the feasibility of forming sewer districts. Ripley stated that the land that is not in an improved state, there would be no worry of dispute, as Boise has become involved in. Ripley stated, "Basically what we have here, as I understand it, is that the City of Meridian, for various reasons, seems reluctant to provide sewer service to that area." (south of freeway). "By reluctant, I mean you have the problems of finance, what particular area do you have pre-treatment problems, administrative problems, etc. Basically, a sewer district removes those problems and at the same,time gives you the same amount of control that you have always had. The reason for that is you control the treatment plant and by controlling the treatment plant, you have the ability to dictate the terms of the contract that the hypothetical sewer district would have to enter into with the City of Meridian for it's treatment. In this particular instance, Meridian Planning an d Zoning February 17. 1975. leeting called to order by the Ac ing Chairman, Don Robetts. lembers present: Don Roberts; WillardRowley; Owen Frost. Others present: Kent Barney; Jim Fuller; Ric Orton; Marvin Bodine; jes Groves Bob Eoff,, ster Schle away. Bob E ff owner of Custom Concrete Products, came before the Commission to request Gond tional use permit to conduct street in Meridian,Id aho. a business of manufacturing septic tanks at 229 Merid. A petition was presented con aining the names of at least 75 of t e residents thin 300 feet of his property agreeing that the did not ob ect to Mr. Eoff using his property for this purpose. . Eoff stated that he that he could find a la ger Olace to operate from by next winter. The moticn was made by Owen �rost and seconded by Willard Ro ley t at the pis ion .recomend to the ity �ouncii that N--; Eoff operating he Cue a spa _ tum ial use concrete products be allowed to o erate!in an A residential der permit until January lst, 1976. Notion passed: All Yea. Jess C. Groves w as present to present a letter requesting the rezone for Lots 1 through 5, `Block 2, of the Bown Addition to Meridian and Lots 1 through Block 8, of Bowers Second Add' ion t Meridian, to be rezoned 'C" fr "An --reside tial.This property is located Bou h of Bower from East 3rd to East 2nd, and North f the alley between Bower Od Ad . Th�s property intends to be sed by a Lumber ompan for lumber storage. The motion was made by ills d Row ey and seconded by Oican frost t at the Commis iion recommend to the City_40unci rezone: ots 1 Through '5, Block _ 2p Block , of Bowers Second Addition Motion passed. A11 Yea. f the to Meridian, that the nedessary, tops Bown Addition to Meridian, from A nesid ntia be taken and Lots to 1 through 6, 1 to "C" Commercial, Kent Barnoy and Jim F ler -.ame bifore the commission to diScuss a parcel 0- 32� 5 acres � which they wish to request Zon change to a PUD Planned ban B evel Cat road went) January 22, 1975 Bank Roust Custom Concrete Products, Inc. c/o Hank I1oust Realty 221 Travertine Way Boise, Idaho 83706 Dear Sir: The City Council has instructed me to inform you that the Conditional Use Permit granted you on the property located at Meridian and Franklin Streets, expires on February 4, 1975. As part of the agreement in granting the Conditional Use Permit, the property was going to be cleaned up and cleared. This has not taken place and I am instructed to inform you that if at the date the permit expires the same has not been taken care of, the permit will not be renewed. In addition, I am informed that you are using the property located at the Northeast intersection of King and Meridian Streets in a manner which is in violation of our zoning ordinance. You are hereby instructed to stop immediately or action will be taken for violation of the Ordinance. Very truly yours, JOHN 0. FITZGERALD City Attorney JOF/kam cc. Herald J. Cox V January 70 1975 %'W7 We the undersigned agree to allow Se R. Eoff db Custom Concrete to use the property at 229 Meridian Street.Meridian Idaho, 83642 as a place to conduct the business of manufact- uring septic tanks. ADDRESS DATE 4, tot East of the Hun,-ry Onion n Stadditional land rhich he owns across he alley o the South for off atee kinable to Qr vide two off e question was raised concernin d I . fortis purpos®_for later times ands th It was felt that multixlex d elliAKai. o, foreir input as -problem oft these Matte a'AsonteA to ed�'. tia� 3�i1c�3. I +�sk� mares I:hewi�,i...,sa:• u :,.0 i 5 I Meridian Planning m d Zoning Commission February 25, 1974.; the Mobile Home Owner. The matter of a Mobile Home Subdivision to the South of the Present Rose nark Mobile Home 8mbdivision. lie-quos"O" rose an t0 how long he commission should this Ratter to - _- - =- the Are well developed wJtb mvi&i and spael %is roadways provided and 4-1— 114 ty , littee v. Mi. Roberts stated further, -that he felt here ar adeqlmte )bile Rome (arks i7here rented @paces wv prwided, these 3xeas, but there M . Frost in could be owned Uhers on the commission th ught hot the City had onou;h Mo 11-o -e-q -Por, the s ze of the ow''. I was decided to h because. it was noted that Mme 7 rbn- ad :f!nv M:3 Council in this matter to he Mostt�m that hag been act by the (Ii tv 08n-nndl CI V _ ernon Schoen, the build in a for bro u the m tter of Mr i rich_ Mann ne a multiinlex ttuil ng. i the form of a 12-mlex. in th® ow®rs lddition tot East of the Hun,-ry Onion n Stadditional land rhich he owns across he alley o the South for off atee kinable to Qr vide two off e question was raised concernin d I . fortis purpos®_for later times ands th It was felt that multixlex d elliAKai. o, foreir input as -problem oft these Matte a'AsonteA to ed�'. tia� 3�i1c�3. I +�sk� mares I:hewi�,i...,sa:• u :,.0 6 Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission February 25,:.1974 5i - 1974.Clerk Clerk, feel that they do not ha the ixecessary answers. It was felt that it arae necessary to rovide at least 2 off street parking spaces for each apartment or dwell' within the Cit i whe ever manner the developer oa7d prbvi4 e, and that nmsual cases should at lea 3t have the knowledge of the Co isdon. It was felt hat St askyalcmer was in an unufflIgI position if Is to weilL one month 119fo-re-13A gould_be a o mt, while the Commission ftaidet their probl im, when the Building n e for and City Clerk was working losel with them. IT—here beim no other usin ss to come before the Commission,the meeting Stood- o Attest: Chairman City Clerk —. 'r. . .i 1 I Meridian City Hall 010 C) 0 December 2. 1974 ,SMeeting was called to order by the Mayor Don MO Storey. Members present; W. D. Sliver; Marvin Bodine; Kennet i Rasmussen; John Navarro. Others present: Dick Phillips; Mr. and Mrs. John Fai ; Ri Orton; Vernon Schoen. CravTurd--,GaYTGr8en 3ruce SNALeU-6; Minutes of previous eetir g and special meeting were read nd ap roved as read. Mr. and Mrs. John Fain bus ness in -M - ern -0—an wa6 presEnt to discuss the pos -Bo se -op rates on A-f-e-ao"n-.-O"r. ibility of ft a taxi cab n stau"Iddo Chief of Police, _Gar .L_Greeff st ted that he felt that he c6nsidezed operating from an a taxi service would be helpful to his depar;ment-1 Mr. Fain stated that _ffic­D —spot "Un the center of town and w uld vqanta taxi stand space nearby to be near a telephone, Mr. Skiver, the Poli surroundin&cities to a GO*issicner, was appointed to arrive at fairoperat#gfeejor look thi into taxi .harges in service. The Mayor announced be held in Boise at the Council would -at �hat on December 10th the District :00 And 6:30 to 9:30. The end.! He offered to pick up any kelq at tie Downtowner Motel iq #3_ Mayor wishing IC Meeting hoped to is to that all attend the eveningting, This meelIg is to be Bois a. The Atwater property wasdiscus ad. There was a 60 day deadline fro October lat. The City Clark is to write a letter to Ernest Lembke cones ning this, in the matter The .prod qrty at Meridian and Fr nkl* owned and mans The City Council made noto that�ino improvement is noted of coed 5�wion,� ed by Custom Concrete since a letter was --set- to clean thi-s-place �o Mr. Skiver, Chairmanlof the Planing and Zoning Cc= ssio-nl, stat ad also that --ham is Construct:L116 S r-operty-ari w4e Meridian and King Air nue. Thio property is "All residentZl N o -i e and -sec tion - v:t what he is -dai-ng ±u -mT-unlawful _�ZWT Use- �____ This matte is to be inve tigatd by the Mayor with possib e action through -- ---the zestricti It was noted that Mr;. Hout would need to take steps A -parcel of -pro a y wa s discussed. A business sign is i�n the!windo�i of the house indicating 9 an "All residential. ! Mr. Schoen looked and could not;locate this place. A was resented to Mr. SchoOn wholis to notify these pc-_qple _pne use permit must be secure4 to carry on a business in to se ureaconditional buss -mor e poli that a an "A'_—Res identii-1 ss use in ve location conditional — area by getting the _a=o . approval s�gnat �e of at least 75% of I 300 feet of his lan4s. the property - i __ within 2-- I __ L STATE OF IDAHO .REV 6-ye6 �' DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS District No.3_ PERMIT. TO USE RIGHT OF WAY Application No. 3-68-97 The undersigned applicant is given permission to construct the following item(s) on highway right of way: APPROACH Joint approach to be used by 1 _ 29 _ Business it L,of Mara d� ani d j4mgry Onion Drive—in) Quantity Width TYPE: Residence, Business, Field, etc. UNDERGROUND UTILITY Size . KIND : Gas Line, Telephone Line, Water Line, etc. . OVERHEAD UTILITY Size KIND: Power Line, Telephone Line, etc. OTHER Explain A SKETCH OF PROPOSED WORK MUST BE ATTACHED SPECIAL PROVISIONS (Sketch Attached) LOCATION OF WORK U.S. 30 52.86 Ada Highway Route No. Milepost County Tnn Meridian Distance and Direction from Nearest City, Town or Village The undersigned certifies that he is the owner or authorized representative of, the owner of the proposed facility or property to be served and agrees to do the MW c1o,,rd_ancep-with. the rules and regulations of the State of Idaho, Departmggt of Highways. r �'`'�'� r___ Date June 28 196— T AT p1 Post Office Address APPLICANT:. PLEASE READ THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM FOR DISTRICT USE Subject to all terms, conditions and provisions shown on this form or attachments, permission is hereby granted to Clinton W. ainarlob Name Route 4, Nampa, Idabo 83651 to perform the work described above. AddressSTATE H I � GINEER Date June 28 19 68 By District Engineer Durin.-I -.jr.,_ of tl.,- w r?. u-.% i urr I cades. lights ars.' _t_:.vr tLI-kj ! iC C%'* and ma Ir.f CO ned as may be nece.-'_ar,, r ac may he 11 rel -t-, for the protection of the: t ravr 1 In -1 public. In acceptinq thpu=11_ its successors and asci in', aqrcc-s 'o pr:-!,�ct tht, 'tat Idal,6, or its agents, and save it harmless fr,-,r, =,11 zlaL:nr:, .3 t:.%.s or of every k.li,d a:,d dencnip�!:)r w, :t -J, rz-. ��­iue te, .)r 1-e rif -re b, y C j ft- d i any per- son or persons, corp.ratior. or or the p6•rfot7a=t Of SUCh W'IrV.. .7-iar.,:-!er used sir rianner of It.- staliation. fraintenanc, an�i orertiti-,,n, _r U.e improper occupancy of rights of wa, )r pul7lic place -,r p,:blic struct.ire, and in case any suit or action is 1,ro-ig;tt aoainst said ",tate of Idaho, its officers or for eia-ages, arising out of or 1--v reason of any of rhe above causc�s. tt.e Urantee,. its successors or assigns, will, upon notice to it of com.encement, of such action', defend the same a4- its zmen sole and expr.-n-se, and will sr.tisfy any judgment after said su!t or fiction &.all ,ave finall,.., been deter- mined if adverse tD -.r• Slate of 1daho, Its officers or aqents. Except as herein aut.,,;­-Izc.d, no e=i-aft in shall be made or obstacle placed within ti -,F.- 111-mtEs of 4-!.e state highway in' such a manner as to interfere with tht, travel over said road. If the work done 'ander this pen,,,i+ I.,i any raiiner Involves the disturbance of the traveled surface of the road, said portion of thN traveled surface of the road shall b- restored at the completion of said work to the sattafa,_'tinr;wof the State Highway Ergineer, and if the c;rantee should fail and/or refuse to restore said traveled v_rface to the sa+-isfact.1,3n of the State* HI-ft,way Engineer, said surface may be restnrod by the Highway Department at the expense of the Grante-,. If the work done under this permit Interferes in any way with the drainage of the state hignway. the Crantee shall wholly and at his own expense make such provision as the Engineer may direct to take care of said drainage. On completion of said work herein contemplated all rubbish and debris Shall be immediately removed and the roadway and -road— side shall be left neat and presenta.1.2m ara to the satisfaction of the State Highway Engineer. All of the work herein contemplated shall be done under the supervision and to the satisfaction of the State Highway Engi- neer, and the entire expense of said sup,.rvi-;ion shall r- borne by the party or parties to whom this perird.f is ipsued. The St9te Highway Engineer hereby reserves the right to order tne cnange of location or the removal of any stru,--turr- or struc- tures authorized by this permit at any time, said change or removal to be made at the sole expense of the partyor parties to whom this permit is issued, or their successors and assigns. All such changes, reconstruction or relocation by the grantees 'shall be done in such manner• as will cause the.least inter- fecence with any of the State's work and t:,e State of Idaho shall in no wise be held liable for a!,y damage to the Grantee by rea— son of any such work by the *State of Idaho, its agents or representaLives, or by the exercise of any ri3hts -1y tj.e State upor roads, streets, public places or structures in question. This permit or privilege shall not * be deemed or held to be an -exclusive one and shall not proll,.L)it the State from granting other permits or franchise rights o.1- like or other nature to other public or pri%,ate utilities, nor shall it prevent the state from using any of. its roads, streets, or public places, or affect its right to full stiperiision and control' over all or any part of them, none of which is hereby surrendered. The State Highway Engineer may revoke, annul, change, amend, amplify, or terminate this permit., or any of the conditions here- in enumerated if Grantee falls to comply with any or all of Its provisions, requirements or regulations as herein set forth or -through willful or unreasonable neglect, fails to heed.or comply with notices,given or. if the utility h;. --rein granted is •not 'id w ­ stalled or operated and maintained in c­)nfcrmity herewith or at all or for any cause or reason whatsoever. The party or parties to whom this permit is issued shall maintain at his or their sole expense the structure or object for which this permit is granted in a condition satisfactory to the State Highway Engineer, In accepting this permit the Granrie, his successors and ass! ins. agree that any damage or Injury done to the property, of the Grantee or any expense incurred by ,sirs through the operation of a contractor, working for the :tate or of any State empl -,yee shall be at the sole expense of the Grantee, his successors or assi-Ins. Neither the acceptance of this permit nor anything herein contained shall be construed, as a waiver by the Grantee of any rights given it by the Constitution or la,!s of the State of Idaho or of the United States. No work shall be started until an autnorized representative of the Department of Highways has giver, the notice toproCeed. A bond in the amount.of 1 is required fcr the protecti.-n-, of the State as set fortn in ti:e *erm.s of th? t-ond. This permit. - shall be void unless the work herein contemplated s--11 ha, -e been cnmrleved te-oke ( Rte) 1:wLLt UH 2'40A 06-67 To accompany Form OH 240 Ful to IDAHO DEPT OF HIGHWAYS REPORT ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO USE RIGHT OF WAY LOCATION OF WORK district No. 3 Application No. 3-68-97 86-c __ _ 456.5+50 _ .66 Project No Station Milepost Other Description; Section, Township, Range if Station is Not Available TYPE OF ACCESS CONTROL Partial Standard Approach Policy APPROACH 1. Yes If the approach is located within the limits of a city, town or village, granted by the city, town or village? 2. 900 What is the approach angle (in degree) as shown on attached sketch? 3 e18ttr. At this location, what is the sight distance ? Posted speed ? 4. No Will the approach adversely affect the operation of the highway? If yes, explain has approval bee n 5. No Is any future highway construction being planned for this area at this time ? 6. 5o What is the estimated daily volume of traffic that will use this approach ? How many of these are trucks ? 7. Yes Have you checked to see that the proposed approach conforms to our "Approach Policy" ?. 8. la In the event of adjoining approaches in an urban area is the minimum distance of 10 feet provided between approaches for pedestrian protection ? 9. oto. In the event of adjoining approaches, can the space between approaches be divided into adequate parking spaces approximately 20-23 feet long ? 10. -No Is a distance of 5 feet or more provided between the approach and the adjoining property line ? 11. No in the event the proposed approach is located near an intersection, will the approach 180, Southvoid encroachment on the corner radius ? 12.2601 NorIf the proposed approach is within 200 feet 'of an intersection, what is the distance from the centerline of the approach to the centerline of the intersection, measured along the highway shoulder? 13. N.L. If the approach grade is steeper than 5%, is a flat stopping zone prgvided at the highway shoulder ? 14. ATA- If a drainage pipe is needed, what kind of pipe will be required ? Size Length 15. NA- Will the approach drain away from the traveled -way ? if Any of the Above is Not Applicable, Indicate N. A. For Additional Remarks Attach a Separate Sheet if Necessary CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE UTI LITI ES 1. What will be the method of installation? (Boring, Jacking, etc.) 2.' - What will be the minimum cover over t -he utility ? 3. Will freezing conditions affect this facility? 4. Is any future highway construction being planned for this area at this time ? 5. During installation, will normal traffic movements be interrupted ? "..,,•6. Have adequate provisions been made for flagging, slowing, or detouring, etc. of traffic? Attach traffic control plan. 7. Will this facility interfere with normal maintenance operations, cleaning ditches, back - slopes etc. ? 8. Does the proposed utility .and installation conform to -Department policies ? See Administrative Directive 9. What will be the minimum vertical clearance ? 10. What will be the distance from the highway shoulder to the nearest support or anchor? 11. What will be the maximum span length ? 12. ' If in urban area has City Officials' approval been obtained ? If Any of the Above is Not Applicable, Indicate N. A. For Other Encroachments -Attach Additional Sheets to Describe if Necessary District Representative's (YES) (NO) Recommendat' f A I SIGNATURE ion or pp. va ( ) Forward to Boise Office District Engineer DISTRICT STAFF REVIEW To be reviewed by: ✓ Reviewer's Initials Recommended Yes No Traffic Engineer Survey & Plans Maintenance Engr. Right of Way Design Engineer Construction Construction Right of Way ., T E E ADN BOISE STAFF REVIEW To be reviewed by : ✓ Reviewer's Recommended Initials Yes No Planning &Traffic Survey & Plans Maintenance Right of Way Construction x` Explain reason for recommendation. �"k Only required for special situations and when a revision to access control is proposed. m