HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindingsI '
• •
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FREDRIC V. SHOEMAKER, et al
APPLICATION FOR REZONE
NW 15th STREET
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLIISIONS OF LAW
The above entitled matter having come on for public
hearing April 9, 1991, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. Testi-
mony was presented in favor of request, and also in opposition
thereto. The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of
Meridian .having duly considered the evidence and the matter
makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That a notice of public hearing on the Application
for Rezone was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
the said public hearing scheduled for April 9, 1991, the first
publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hear-
ing; that the matter was duly considered at the April 9, 1991,
hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express
comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices
were available to newspaper, radio and television stations.
2. That this property is located within the City
of Meridian and is owned by Petitioner, Fredric V. Shoemaker,
et al, and is described in the application which description
is incorporated herein.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLQSIONS OF LAW - 1
• •
3. That the property is zoned Limited Office
District (L-O).
4. That the Amended Restrictive Covenants and
Restrictions covering Leisman Addition recorded in Instrument
No. 8111915, records of Ada County, Idaho, specifically pro-
vides in Section 2a that all of said lots shall be known and
described as Commercial-Limited Office lots. That said
Covenants and Restricts further provide in Section 3 that the
Covenants may be amended by a majority of the owners of said
lots. That a majority of said lot owners have consented to
the rezone of the subject property.
5. That the rezone request is limited to Lots 1-5,
Block 3 of Leisman Addition. That the request is for a rezoning
of said :~.ats to R-15 zoning.
6. That city sewer and water is already available to
the property, but the use may require additional charges or
fees .
7. That notice was given to all property owners who
are within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the land
being considered, and all property owners included within the
property being considered.
8. That the subject property is surrounded on three
sides, the south, west and north by property zoned Limited-
Office District (L-O). That the property on the east is
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLQSIONS OF LAW - 2
• •
presently zoned R-4.
CONCLIISIONS OF LAW
1. That all th.e procedural requirements of the
Local- Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian
have been met and complied with by Petitioner.
2. That the City of Meridian has authority to grant
applications for rezone pursuant to 67-6511 Idaho Code and,
pursuant to 11-2-416 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances
of the City of Meridian.
3. That the application for rezone being limited
to Lots 1-5 in Block 3, is in effect only a partial rezone of
the area, Lots 6 and 7, Block 3 is presently vacant land.
4. That 11-2-416 (R) of the Revised and Compiled
Ordinances of the City of Meridian sets forth the standards
under which the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City
Council shall review applications for zoning amendments; that
upon a review of those requirement and a review of the facts
presented and the conditions of the area, the Planning and
Zoning Commission concludes as follows:
A. That the new zoning would be in accordance with
the comiprehensive plan.
B. The area included in the zoning amendment is not
intended to rezoned in the future.
C. The area included in the zoning amendment is in-
tended to be developed in the fashion that would be
allowed under the new zoning.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLQSIONS OF LAW --3
•- • •
D. There has not been any change in the area or
adjacent areas which would dictate that the azea
should be rezoned.
E. The proposed uses will not be designed, constru-
cted, operated and maintained to be hazmonious and
appropriate in appearance with the existing or in-
tended character of the general vicinity and that
such use will change the essential character of the
same area.
F. The azea will be served adequately by essential
public facilities and services such as highways, streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structure, refuse
disposal, water and sewer.
G. The area will not create excessive additional re-
quirements at public cost for public facilities and
services and will not be detrimental to the economic
welfare of the community.
H. The proposed uses will not involve uses, activities,
processes, materials, equipment and conditions of
operation that will~be detrimental to any persons, pro-
perty or the general welfaee by reason of excessive
production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or
odors.
I. The vehicular approaches to the property will not
create an interference with traffic on surrounding
public streets.
J. The use of the azea will not result in the destruc-
tion, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of
major importance.
R. The proposed zoning amendment is not in the best
interest of the City of N~eridian.
5. The request for rezone should be denied.
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby
adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 4
P i ~
n • •
7?f1T.T. C`AT.T.
COMMISSIONER HEPPER
COMMISSIONER ROONTREE
COMMISSIONER SHEARER
COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI
VOTED (~ ~. ~'
VOTED (/, C q
VOTED
VOTED~~e J ~'"
CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (Tie Breaker) VOTED
DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby
recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that
they deny the request for rezone requested by the applicant
for the property described in the application in accordance
with the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law set forth
herein.
MOTION:
APPROVED:~e9
DISAPPROVED:
Jack C. Riddlemoser
Attorney at Law
Meridian, Idaho 83642
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLIISIONS OF LAW - 5
~ •
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FREDRIC V. SHOEMAKER, et al
APPLICATION FOR REZONE
NW 15th STREET
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLDSIONS OF LAW
The above entitled matter having come on for public
hearing April 9, 1991, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. Testi-
mony was presented in favor of request, and also in opposition
thereto. The Planning and Zoning Com®ission of the City of
Meridian having duly considered the evidence and the matter
makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That a notice of public hearing on the Application
for Rezone was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
the said public hearing scheduled for April 9, 1991, the first
publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hear-
ing; that the matter was duly considered at the April 9, 1991,
hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express
comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices
were available to newspaper, radio and television stations.
2. That this property is located within the City
of Meridian and is owned by Petitioner, Fredric V. Shoemaker,
et al, and is described in the application which description
is incorporated herein.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLIISIONS OF LAW - 1
3. That the property is zoned Limited Office
District (L-O).
4. That the Amended Restrictive Covenants and
Restrictions covering Leisman Addition recorded in Instrument
No. 8111315, records of Ada County, Idaho, specifically pro-
vides in Section 2a that all of said lots shall be known and
described as Commercial-Limited Office lots. That said
Covenants and Restricts further provide in Section 3 that the
Covenants may be amended by a majority of the owners of said
lots. That a majority of said lot owners have consented to
the rezone of the subject property.
5. That the rezone request is limited to Lots 1-5,
Block 3 of Leisman Addition. That the request is for a rezoning
of said :lots to R-15 zoning.
6. That city sewer and water is already available to
the property, but the use may require additional charges or
fees .
7. That notice was given to all property owners who
are within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the land
being considered, and all property owners included within the
property being considered.
8. That the subject property is surrounded on three
sides, the south, west and north by property zoned Limited-
Office District (L-O). That the property on the east is
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 2
presently zoned R-4.
CONCLQSIONS OF LAW
1. That all the procedural requirements of the
Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian
have been met and complied. with by Petitioner.
1. That the City of Meridian has authority to grant
applications for rezone pursuant to 67-6511 Idaho Code and,
pursuant to 11-2-416 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances
of the City of Meridian.
3. That the application for rezone being limited
to Lots 1-5 in Block 3, is in effect only a partial rezone of
the area, Lots 6 and 7, Block 3 is presently vacant land.
4. That 11-2-416 (R) of the Revised and Compiled
Ordinances of the City of Meridian sets forth the standards
under which the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City
Council shall review applications for zoning amendments; that
upon a review of those requirement and a review of the facts
presented and the conditions of the area, the Planning and
Zoning Commission concludes as follows:
A. That the new zoning would be in accordance with
the comprehensive plan.
B. The area included in the zoning amendment is not
intended to rezoned in the future.
C. The area included in the zoning amendment is in-
tended to be developed in the fashion that would be
allowed under the new zoning.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLQSIONS OF LAW --3
' ~ ~.
D. There has not been any change in the area or
adjacent areas which would dictate that the area
should be rezoned.
E. The proposed uses will not be designed, constru-
cted, operated and maintained to be harmonious and
appropriate in appearance with the existing or in-
tended character of the general vicinity and that
such use will change the essential character of the
same area.
F. The area will be served adequately by essential
public facilities and services such as highways, streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structure, refuse
disposal, water and sewer.
G. The area will not create excessive additional re-
quirements at public cost for public facilities and
services and will not be detrimental to the economic
welfare of the community.
H. The proposed uses will not involve uses, activities,
processes, materials, equipment and conditions of
operation that will be detrimental to any persons, pro-
perty or the general welfare by reason of excessive
production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or
odors.
I. The vehicular approaches to the property will not
create an interference with traffic on surrounding
public streets.
J. The use of the area will not result in the destruc-
tion, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of
major importance.
R. The proposed zoning amendment is not in the best
interest of the City of Meridian.
5. The request for rezone should be denied.
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLDSIONS OF LAW
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Co~i.ssion hereby
adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law.
FINDINGS OF FACT ATID CONCLIISIONS OF LAW - 4
D~1T_T_ ['aT_T_
COMMISSIONER HEPPER
COMMISSIONER ROQNTREE
COMMISSIONER SHEARER
COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI
VOTED [~ N ~
VOTED !,' C g
VOTED_y~
voTED 1~ Se ~ ~"
CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (Tie Breaker) VOTED
DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Comanission hereby
recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that
they deny the request for rezone requested by the applicant
for the property described in the application in accordance
with the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law set forth
herein.
MOTION:
APPROVED :~}~J f (/~~9
DISAPPROVED:
Jack C. Riddlemoser
Attorney at Law
Meridian, Idaho 83642
FINDINGS OF FACT AND (;ONCLDSIONS OF I,AW - 5