Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutU.S. Geological Survey for Operation Of Continuous Water Quality Monitors In The Lower Boise and Snake RiversCity of Mer idi an Publ ic Wor ks D ept. Memo To: Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Frorts Clint Dolsby, Ailing Cily Engineer CC: Thomas Barry, Public Works Director Date: 8!18/2008 Re: Proposed Agenda Item for August 26, 2008 City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following item be placed on the August 26 City Council agenda, under consent agenda, for Counctl's consideration: USGS Joint Funding Agreement. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) arul Boise River municipalities have developed a monitoring plan to collect water quality data on the Snake and Boise Rivers. The plan is to operate three continuous water quality monitors for multiple years (10-20) to track improvements in water quality related to TMDL implementation on Lower Boise and Snake Rivers. This agreement implements the first of at least six years of the plan. Total costs for the rust year is $158,478 (USGS match of $74,476; local costs of $84,000). In subsequent years, total costs will increase to $250-300,000 per year. USGS matching funds are artUapated to be in the $30,000 to $50,000 range per year. The following Municipalities have committed fund the first year of the project (FY2008): Boise ($47,600), Meridian ($8,800), Nampa ($15,900), and Caldwell ($13,800). The proposed Water Quality Monkorirg Memorarbum of Understanding Cost Share to toe signed by these four entities is attached. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Deparbment recommends that City Council approves the USGS Jolnt Funding Agreement for $8,800 and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding any of these ftems. • Page 1 JOINT FUNDING AGREEMENT OPERATION OF CONTINUOUS WATER QUALITY MONITORS IN THE LOWER BOISE AND SNAKE RIVERS BY THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the City of Boise ,hereinafter "Boise", City of Meridian, hereina$er "Meridian", City of Caldwell, hereinaRer "Caldwell" and the City of Nampa, hereinaRer "Nampa" for the purpose of jointly funding the collection of water quality data on the Boise and Snake Rivers by the United States Geological Survey. WHEREAS, Boise, Meridian, Nampa and Caldwell (collectively "the Cities") are subject to NPDES permits issued by the U.S. EPA which regulate discharges to Waters of the US including the Boise and Snake Rivers; and WHEREAS, the Cities have determined it is Uteir best interests to monitor water quality in the lower Boise and Snake Rivers; and WHEREAS, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) has offered to perform continuous water quality monitoring of the Lower Boise and Snake Rivers on behalf of the Cities subject to cost sharing ;and WHEREAS, for the fiscal year 2008 (ending September 30, 2008) the USGS has agreed to contribute $74,476.00 for water quality monitoring provided the Cities provide $84,000 in matching funds; and WHEREAS, the USGS will only contract with one of the Cities for the purpose of jointly funding the water quality study for fiscal yeaz 2008; and WHEREAS, Boise has agreed to contract with USGS and be the funding conduit for the Cities to USGS; and WHEREAS, the Cities have determined funding contribution amounts for fiscal year 2008 to utilize USGS for water quality monitoring of the Lower Boise and Snake Rivers; and WHEREAS, the Cities desire to enter into this agreement to formalize the Cities funding and other obligations for the USGS water quality monitoring project NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, it is agreed: 1. Boise will enter into a contract with the United States Geological Survey (USGS) for the purpose of jointly funding continuous water quality monitoring of the Lower Boise and Snake Rivers. The contract shall be in substantially the form set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto, and shall be for the fiscal yeaz ending September 30, 2008. 2. The Cities agree to the following cost sharing amounts for the joint funding of the Cities fiscal year 2008 share (through Boise) of the USGS agreement: Boise $47,600 Meridian $6,800 Caldwell $13,800 Nampa $15,900 3. Boise shall invoice each of the Cities for their funding shaze within 30 days of finalizing the USGS agreement. The Cities shall pay their invoiced shaze to Boise within 30 days of invoice receipt. 4. The Cities agree to seek additional funding from other sources including the State, other municipalities and private utilities to potentially defray the costs of this agreement. Any money received will be distributed to the Cities for their pro rata share. In the event the USGS terminates the USGS contract resulting in a return of funds the returned funds will be distributed to the Cities for their pro rata shaze. 5. The term of this agreement from the signature date to September 30, 2008. Any City may withdraw from this agreement by providing notice to the other Cities but shall remain obligated for payment of their share set forth in Section 2. CITY OF BOISE BY: Its: Dated CITY OF MERIDIAN BY: Dated Its: CITY OF NAMPA BY: Dated Its: CITY OF CALDWELL BY: Dated Its: END OF AGREEMENT United States Depaztment of the Interior U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY IDAHO WATER SCIENCE CENTER 230 Collins Road Boise, Idaho 83702-4520 Lune 27.2008 Mr. Robbin Finch City of Boise Public Works Department P.O. Box 500 Boise, Idaho 83701A500 Dear Mr. Finch: Enclosed are two documents. The first is entitled "A Proposal to Operate Continuous WarervQuality Monitors in the Lower Boise and Snake Rivers, Idaho". This document provides technical and funding details for a proposed project that would provide continuous water-quality monitoring at three sites -one on the Lower Boise and two on the Snake River, one above and one below the confluence with the Boise River. The proposal describes the monitoring approach that would be used and the associated costs beginning in 2008 and continuing through ?013. As outlined in table 2 of the proposal the costs for first year of the project are $158,476. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is prepared to contribute $74,476 towards the FY 2008 costs as outlined in the second enclosed docurt~nt which is a Joint Futtding Agreement (JFA). In subsequent years the USGS matching funds contribution will be at least $30,000 with the possibility of being as much as $50,000 depending upon availability. If this proposal meets with your approval please obtain appropriate signatures on both copies of the agreement, retain one for your files, and return the other to us. Work performed with funds from this agreement will be conducted on a fixed-price basis. The results of all work under this agreement will be available for publication by the U.S. Geological Survey. Questions concerning this proposal should be addressed to Mark Hardy at (208) 387-L352 or mhardy®usgs.gov. Sincerel , ~/~/Z~%V V Kathy D. Peter, P.E. Director, IWSC Enclosures Copy to: Greg Clark, USGS, Boise Mark Hardy, USGS, Boise Steve Lipscomb, USGS, Boise Sally Thompson, USGS, Boise A Proposal to Operate Continuous Water-Quality Monitors in the Lower Boise and Snake Rivers, Idaho BACKGROUND The USEPA approved Total Maximttm Daily Load for Snake RivedHells Canyon reach (SR-HC TMDL) recognizes excess phytoplanlaon production in the Hells Canyon reservoirs. To protect the designated beneficial uses N the reach, maximum-seasonal-average and maximum chlorophyll-a concentrations have been set at 14 mg/L and 30 tng/L, respectively. To attain then conditions, maximum total-phosphorus (TP) concentration at the mouth of the Boise River have been set at 0.07 mg/L; significantly lower than past monitored and modeled TP concentrations. The relations between chlorophyll-a concentrations and phosphorus concentrations in the SR-HC TMDL reach are unknown. Also unknown are the effects of nitrogen concentrations on algal production; effects of the algal communities on other key waterquality properties related to beneficial uses such ss wales clarity (turbidity), pH, and dissolved-oxygen content: and the significance of Boise Rivet contributions of TP, total nitrogen (TN), and chlorophyll-a to the loads transported by the Snake River into Brownlce Reservoir. Finally, limited work using automatic samplers suggests that TP concentrations in the Boise River may change significantly and more rapidly than monthly monitoring frequencies were able to show. To determine if concentrations of chlorophyll-a and TP are truly improving or meeting established targets, and to address the unlmown information anti data variability issues discussed above, intensive monitoring in the Boise and Snake Rivers is necessary. To make such monitoring cast effective, use of automated methods is desirable. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this project are to: Install and operate continuous water-quality (WQ) monitors on the lower Boise River and on the Snake River above and below Boise River confluence, Evaluate how well data from continuous WQ monitors (particularly chlorophyll-a) represent conditions in the cross sections of the Rivers, Evaluate relations between concentrations of chlorophylls and thou of phosphorus amd nitrogen species. Evaluate the relative importance of Boise River TP and TN loads to the Snake River loads, Estimate TP, TN, and chlorophyll-a loads to Brownlee Reurvoir, Operate an automatic sampter to determine the short-tent variations in TP ~ mwr ........e.,,.4r:n.,e ;., rhP Boise River near Patina. APPROACH Four commercial mWtiparameter wateryuahty monitors will be purchased capable of continuous monitoring of tem~perazure, pH, dissolved oxygen, conductance. turbidity and chlorophyll-a. Three of the instruments will be installed at the Boise River near Parma, ID; the Snake River near Nyssa, OR (about 9 miles below tbe confluence with the Boise River); and the Snake River near Adrian, OR (about 7 miles above the confluence with the Boise River). The fourth instrument will be used when servicing the installations to collect comparative data for evaluating installation fouling and for making necessary corrections to the data record. This instrument will also be a backup if an installation completely fails. A refrigerated automatic sampler will be reactivated at the Boise River near Parma, ID. Sampling frequency of the multiparameter instruments will be 15-minute intervals. Although this relatively high frequency will probably be more than necessary to capture significant stream processes, i[ may provide necessary information for interpreting aad correcting the data record as well as verifying data ttends that occur over dial cycles. Water samples for laboratory analyses of chlorophyll-a, orthophosphate, TP, ammonia, nitrite-plus-nitrate, and TN will be collected during most site visits. Chlorophyll-a analyses will be performed by the US Bureau of Reclamation laboratory in Boise, ID; nutrient analyses will be performed by the USGS National Water Quality Laboratory. Unless data collection needs to cover certain hydrologic events, the automatic sampler will be set to collect samples at 49-hour intervals to ensure that samples are not collected at the same time each day and that both daylight and dark periods are included. Because nutrient species are not expected W be stable in samples held in an automatic sampler, these samples will be analyzed only for TN and TP by the USGS National Water Qtrality laboratory. Continuous streamdischarge information will be available from gages near the Nyssa and Parma sites. However, lack of a gage az Adrian will require that instantaneous discharge measurements are made during site visits when full cross-section samples are collected. Significant amounts of quality-control data need to be collected to determine how well instrument- installation and auto-sampler locations represent the entire river cross sections, and the impacts of installazion fouling on accuracy of the data. To minimiu data compromised by fouling, servicing intervals will vary from wcekly during high algal-productivity periods to monthly during low- Productivity periods, Qualitytontrol samples and rrteasunernents will include comparisons of multiparameter-instrument readings using an independem instrument next to the installation, pro- and post leaning measurements and samples, grab samples at the ittstru~nt installation and automatic- sampler-intake locations, and replicate samples. Table 1 shows a generalized uhedule anticipated for service on installations and collection of samples. TABLE 1.--Generalized tasks and frequencies for service and sample wllection TASK Odoberthrough May June July through September Continuous-monitorservice Monthl Biweekl Weekly Multi arametercrosssedions Monthly Biweekl Biweekl Grabsam les(chloro hyll) Monthl Biweekl Weeki EWI samples (chloro h II & nutrients) Monthl Biweekl Weekly Discha a measurements (Adrian onl) Monthly Biweekl Weekly Parma auotmatic-sam ler service Monthi Biweekl Weekly PRODUCTS Measurements of temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, conductance, turbidity, and chlorophyll-a will be recorded at IS-minute intervals. This data will be available to the public on the USGS www site, generally within 3 weeks after downloading from the instruments. Only data determined to be of poor quality and uncornctable due to instmrnent fouling or other problems will be omitted. TN and TP analyses from the automatic sampler at Parrna will be reported for automatically-collected samples at 49- hour intervals (approximately 175-180 samples per full year). Collection of additional qualitycontrol samples will be done to ensure that samples from the automatic sampler continue to represent the Boise River. Starting in the second year of the project, products interpreting some aspect of the project will be produced. Interpretive reports summarizing tin: overall monitoring network and resulting data will be produced every 2 ro 3 years with every other one designed to coincide with EPA's reporting requirements. A smaller product (such as a poster, journal article, or presentation at a technical meeting) addressing some particular aspect of the network data will be produced in 2009 and in each year that an interpretive report is not written thereafter. BUDGET Table 2 shows the annual costs for the project for the federal fiscal year (October 1 -September 30) 2008 through 2013. The USGS will provide $74,476 in matching funds in fy2008 to cover instrument purchases and installations. In subsequent years, minimum USGS matching funds will be $30,000, and could range as high as $50,000, depending on availability and oa costs associated with repass, articles, and other informational projects stemtning from this project TABLE 2,-Project costs in dollars for fiscal years 2003 thronBh 2013 Fyy~ FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 Fl'2013 i t ' 4560 11900 12260 12630 13010 13400 ectovets Pro Labor and installations 29220 71500 73650 75860 78130 80480 Insnuments 55320 10300 10610 10930 11260 Instrument maintenance 7180 19680 20270 20880 21510 22150 Su lies 6700 18750 19310 19890 20480 21100 Laborat Shi and Misc. 2000 30 0 ~~~ 1 0( 10300 106 0 10930 11260 Overhead 53496 121770 126700 130500 134480 138510 TOTAL 158476 257100 276400 284700 293300 302100 USGS share 74476 TBD* TBD TBD TBD TBD Cooperator share 84000 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD *To be determined