Petition from Neighborhood OwnersPETITION BY NEIGHBORHOOD OWNERS OPPOSING COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN CHANGE, ANNEXATION, AND ZONING CHANGE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST VICTORYAND SOUTH EAGLE ROADS
We, the andersigned, as owners of residences in the neighborhoods adjoining the intersection
of East Victory Road and South Eagle Road, oppose the °Comprehensive Plan Amendment to
modify the Future Land Use Map° (CPA-08-002) and AZ OS-010 to annex and rezone, proposed
by the Rose Law Group for approximately 15 acres on the Northwest comer of East Victory and
South Eagle Roads. The annexation and rezone is of about 3.75 acres and the Comprehensive
Plan Amendment is for 15.5 acres, including the 3.75 acres.
We request that the City of Meridian deny both sets of applications, for the reasons set forth in
the Staff Report, and which include:
1. There have already been Comprehensive Plan amendments on the East side of Eagle Road,
north and south of the East Victory intersection, which provide for commercial usage and which
total over twenty acres. One project, on the Southeast comer of the intersection, has already
been approved by Planning and Zoning and will be heard at City Council on August 26. The
uses on that project would provide services sufficient to the neighborhood for the type of service
proposed in the new application by the Rose Law Group. There is no need to duplicate those
services. Additionally, nearly seventeen acres to the north of the intersection, on the East side
of South Eagle Road has been amended in the Comprehensive Plan for neighborhood
commercial purposes. Additionally, there are commercial uses to the north along the East side
of South Eagle Road up to the canal. Adding another 15.5 acres of commercial usage would
greatly overload the area.
2. All the property surrounding the proposed project is residential (Wood Haven subdivision and
Thousand Springs subdivision) as is the property across East Victory to the south of the
proposed project. The proposed project is totally incompatible with those residential areas.
3. The proposed access into and out of the project is not compatible with the intersection and
would create large traffic problems. The project also does not have an overall development plan
for the whole 15.5 acres, which creates the potential of spot development within the 15.5 acres
without proper cross connections and without proper access to East Victory and adjoining
subdivisions. Any project in this area should be a unified project for the whole area, not a
portion of the whole area being changed in the Comprehensive Plan.
Named ~ ~'~~~~~ ~~Z~~~`~~ Address: ~, 6 yd S, C,~~~`'~,~~ /~'lb~~G'irn.~
Phone No.: ~`' _ r ~h~ ~ ~ email: ~ s 2 ~~ ~,.CC~~ S~ ~ ~~9 ~~~
Date: ~ ~Y o ~"
~,` s; .,~
Signature: ~ '~QO~
G
G~w
~-V O~~e O~~e
City C~etk
Cif
•~ ~,~./
Name... ~ ,~
~~~-7IN~ ~~. T~LJL.1/)
Phone No.: .Ss ~-~.f~~
Date: ~'fi s~ / o ~
Signature:
Name:
Phone No.:
Date:
Signature:
Address: ~~ ~ S. a`~-.~- l.~r`-~.-
email: ~~-s~o ~~ ~ cL G ~,,,~.; ~ c~~
Address:
email:
Name: Address:
Phone No.:
Date:
email:
Signature:
Name:
Phone No.:
Date:
Address:
email:
Signature: