HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985 05-31SPECIAL MEETING OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 31, 1985
Special Meeting of the Meridian City Council called to order by Mayor
Grant Kingsford at 5:05 p.m.
Members Present: Bill Brewer, Ron Tolsma, Bert Myers, Bob Giesler:
Other Present: Olive Davis, Gerald Ruyf, Patrica Ruyf, Al Lance, Gary Schaffer,
Bob Wherry, Richard Orton, Bill Barkell, Duaine Rasmussen, Howard Foley,
Jane Van Auker, Sherry Lance, Dave Lewis, Jim Johnson, Roy Porter, Deanna
Hancock, Wes Hoalst; There were several others present whom did not sign
the register.
Mayor Kingsford advised the purpose of this special meeting was for the
Council to make a decision on whether to hold the hearing scheduled for
June 3, 1985 on the Claremont Development Company request for a Compre-
hensive Plan Amendment.
The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Brewer that do to the Public
outcry and the mass of people that wish to testify at the hearing, even
though the letters we received do not contain the committments that we
specified or the designated site that we specified, we hold the Public
Hearing as scheduled at the Meridian Primary School on June 3, 1985 at
7:30. p.m.
Motion Carried: Brewer, Yea: Tolsma, Yea: Myers, Yea; Giesler, Yea:
Being no further business to come before the Special Meeting the Motion
was made by Myers and seconded by Tolsma to adjourn at 5:08 p.m.:
Motion Carried: All Yea:
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
Niem` nn City Clerk
Mayor /& Council
P & I Commission
Atty, Engineer, Stuart
Fire, Police, Ward,
Hein, Mitich, Valley News
Statesman, ACRD, APA,
ACZ,ACC, CDH, NIMD
File (1)
Mail (2)
e
:
i
A,
City Council; That the Commission • recoomnendec�A a�►p�ova], 4>
the "annexation, aofti.uq .and, the- c pdi,tional, use #txb ec .t
the approval by the- City :;Council. of the::va an I t.rth 3 r
city Counei1 has approved the annexation anc xoa IAq a
r
.the
approved Findings of : Pact' and Conclu.Bions rel,atiag etd
annexation- >and toning and ,these Finling�' Faotr
Conclusions,.are .inc4zporated herein; as. if ,set -',fa t;n- 4 F a
5 s=
hereat • r Jr
That the," C3.ty- •CounctI,' !likewise, has aP
Findings of Fact and ` .. Concissiona re�ji ng
-
Conditional Use ted tbo a are : i.ncorporat"ed herein a 3 sae.
foxth ih fulls that, :the ' City .Council .:dais not, :h te,
approved 'the , Conditiz�na1 Use Permit as the oar as :' re exit
must`" first" be appxoeed.. l
a
5. That the toning -approved for the �ppl"io..
- t
R-4: which: is a residential "+oning; that tha t
'
..,,
proposes to ase a portion ` of : bis proporty-` a',
,
repair Shop,,. that an autdmot_i:ve repair st op is,=
',:
allowed use ,oar, an allowed :� . Gonda. tional. use
residential zone; that is order,. or, .tbe" ip .c tat ttt:
his propert for:an"automotive re '
y pair ' hop a "varia4ee •wt
"
1..
be granted to the Zoning Ordinance.
6. fihat, the Applicant' has ;used his. poxpe tg a an
�
Automotive .repair shop" In , the past anO did say Vont
for approximategly ten years; t4wat .his prop6rt,y, .e►as tot ,tli
F"MERALo
in the -City _Umits' of the City .of Mer4diaer'6 t *ies �isz .tbB `;
6 CROOKWON
'* t• ;t
County; tiay:�' a _ f iris - ~destroy+ed his build`iAq Haat' ".
e w r 14
P.OBorz I27
MOMm,
G tis fi"
W.+fi• "f:. ,m as 4,
gg
� .� 1-tw 'a *,. :' ... ,. ,� i � x
j
'I
using . a', garage ,for automitve repair.
Sk
7. That his . neighbors have prev�ioual objected"
r6-eSt4j4 tabment..'-of ,spent..'-ofhis .,rep$ i r shop atnd hue ipea�.� t
have _ h
,` oo►e�re , now. cbnsente& 'to the Appiica t'sr rp pe .
y A
uses providing the Appl,.Jcant complies; witp the "co dlt
which have been made -apart of his proposed- Coboiti dna3,y ' us*'•
Permit.
,r
8. That prior to making application "- to Uhe ctjt�
Applicant, did: make application to t.he'. O$rintp
re'obstruet, his building which > hehad xisse .fors.i$
autoitve shop but ,the sire which the C'cunty waal'd a11:
was. restricted" and not a tFficie"nt to
Applicant as, fa,z .as operating an" aut"ca 'ive '.,r sac r
therein; 'that in -order to make:; hi`°s-' busiwids o rd # J ,•
economically: sensible ,a ..larger stip . was maces:sary- - but t#e t .
County would` -nsit allow a structure thp, 43 a8
h
I
needed; that, the Applicant. cou!A,.havw operated hi °.
t .s�
in a smaller`building and. there Would' "have-
,
over his'. conduct ..of' the " business; thatby granting '#``:U,e{.
Applications the City allows -him". the" 8paceF , e n s :t
Appl3 cent must. coa�gly,,#th the condition$' set..
r
that with the. conditions shat`R bitve bee4 s F
ib"' the " Findi•ng$ , of " :Fact and : Con�clixe ams rel
annexation, zoning, and .the conditional, use the s.tand;t,+
I
and,. Gondi t Lons ':,of the Zoon ng O!rdinjace : will be met.
.FIT�GERALD.
'e, .
m4CLUS I ON$
" O
'.;
•i
r
4
'
propexti* �b the ares where. the ° 4iPliant'.'srp
:Ipcated.t. this is evidenced '= by the C44atent
,that
r
r� r
Appl;ica'nt!s neighbors. -
:.... .
80 That:: the variance'w i11 shot have the e�� t. �f:
s .
altering: the.= intereAt and se of -`the` Soaiag' 1 Awa
'
and' of the ` Mez�,din. Comgzeh�asiv� 'Plan:
'"9. That �sinilar to a Conditional Use Ferarit� 4 varIac�+ce ,
A
Y {
may be conditioned;that thia'a .vairiance itv-
'
and ugon the `}mame ba-aaig that th4 ���a -
.:conciitioAed .
Cohditional -Permit i i6nditf oned and ' f.or. th.k _ Veal
,
of time anci contain -:.the same arestriat#�in:si4dtn�:�,
,
variance and the .p, r 'icfant's, conditional,
1
t* .co-extewttve:
y'
r 10. That this variaaca shal egdom
j
Agglicant aad' shall- not be. traeofered to
pxogert or .to another` indi�;i<dual:
'
Al
OF PIND-04
AisPROVAL .OF.1i`AO`!'
..
The C1tg, Gounei of the city of "rid au l�sr a r
:..
And.:a r v+es` <theae dings' of Fact , and. Coaic],uasiohd, _
n.
RNLI, Chu:;
f
Mot . I
. G poi imamV40is + J. 5 Voted"
r -
r
t
rs
Ct ncilman m
GOL2ed i t
CQun4i.lman TaslstA --.
`
Councslman Brewer Voted-
H
AMMM6, :
,FITZQF u'
Mayor KiAgst6r4 l ( tie:, breaker) toted -...; �► ¢
fte
R Wx}.
y
r
,
,
t