HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997 06-03• •
MERiDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 3, 1997
The speciai meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor Robert
D. Corrie at 6:30 P.M.:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Walt Morrow, Ron Tolsma, Charlie Rountree, Gienn Bentley:
OTHERS PRESENT: Will Berg, Wayne Crookston, Shari Stiles, Gary Smith, Chief
Gordon, Tom Zabala, Paul Marcolina:
Corrie: I will open the special meeting to hear a special presentation by ZGA Architects
cancerning a space study.
Zabala: Mr. Mayor members of the Council my name is Tom Zabala, I appreciate you
having us in here early, I know you have a meeting here later this evening to come in
early and have us present to you early is a really pleasure to us and we appreciate you
taking the time on your agenda. Some of you will probably already have heard
elements of what v~ are going to talk about here real briefly this evening. We felt it was
important for those members of the Council that knew we were retained for planning
and space need analysis services, but hadn't really gone through the selection process
or some of our eartier meetings with the department staff. if we could come in and
briefly explain to you what the process is, what the product will be, how we ace going
about it to date and then be able to answer any questions you might have. It would be a
good foot to start off on this evening. Because at this particular point in time we are still
gathering information we don't really have anything substantive to show to you. But at
least it will give you a chance to see where we are headed. With me tonight is Paul
Marcolina my partr~er who is really heading up the team within our office and with our
consultants to do the day and day out work on this project. He wiff be able to provide
you with some specific detail where I will just be hitting pretty much the high points of
the process. As Meridian like many other comrnunities in our state and around is
affected by the rapidly growing popu{ation and its impacts are often reflected in your
physical faeilities both here in City Hatl and the various departments that you have.
Adaptation takes place by shifting furniture and equipment to accommodate new or
even unplanned uses. We find spaces that prior to this didn't have a use now find a
warm body sitting in them where they were previously a storage room or uses that they
were never intended for. So we are constantly having to make adjustments in facilities
moving people in or out of spaces, in or out of the building to maybe less than desirable
types of things. Our focus on this particular task that you have assigned to us wit{ be to
review all of these departments and the various areas and activities that they are
deafing with, to try and address the wide range of issues that are invalved both in your
current needs as well as some forecasting dov-m the future. And that wil{ aNow you as
the decision makers to decide as you apprvach your capital budget time of the year to
decide whether you need to build or add on to or move facilities. We hope that the
document wil! be one that you will revisit annual{y as priorities and needs change as
circumstances change but it will be a basis from which will allow you to make some
decisions that are defendable not only as administrators but will allow you to make
Meridian City Council • •
Special Meeting
June 3, 1997
Page 2
prudent decisions to the pubiic and in preparing your future capital budgets. The
process that we use generally involves the following elements, the City has identified for
us the various departments that they vw~uld like us to interview, the staff s that we v+rould
like to meet with. We have begun that process. We have had an orientation meeting
with all of the committees and we are now going on a one on one basis to meet with
certain committees, we have met with probably 3 or 4 at this poirrt. Paul and others from
our office accompanied the Chief the new facilities the police department over at Nampa
the other day to see how they are operating because there are some things over there
that would be beneficial perhaps to the Planning Process here in Meridian. As we meet
with these people and discuss with them we are documenting their information on forms
and other means and will begin to assemble that. We will look at what their space needs
are we will prepare these space requirements at the end of our general meetings into a
document and call everybody back together and give them the benefit of what w~e have
learned up to that point. To make sure that everybody is understanding of how each
department is looking at itself. And again try to build a consensus of direction. We
would hope that there would be interest in the City Councii and Mayor's office to
participate or have representatives at this so that we are making sure that what the
departments are teiiing us are in fact the vision that you have for the City and the
community for Central administration. From this we will begin to develop overall building
and or site requirements for City Hall and the various departments with respect to the
use, what purpose they will have and other general requirements. We are going to be
defining basic fundamental relationships befinreen departments and within departments,
certain spatial and visual relationships those departments must have in order to function
efficiently among themselves and with the public that they may or may not interFace
with. We will identify measures for future growth and change, w~e will develop a room
and space program and will present this in a draft form at the conclusion of that second
phase that will have not only the program but the various spaces and departments
identified and will have some preliminary budgets for accomplishing some of the things
that we envision that you will need to do this. The program elements will be provided
both in a written form that you can take and study and there will be visual documents
there in terms of some generic bubble soft etched diagrams. These will not be definitive
design drawings, drawings that you vaould take and build from, they would give you
some direction upon which future budgets as they are prioritized, future needs are
prioritized. You would then go out and contract for specific design services if they are
needed to accomplish some of these goals. The success of our effort obviousfy
depends upon a lot of cooperation and understanding both from the administration as
weN as the departments. You had that to date and we feel that is going to continue. Our
process involves consensus building, we feel that the departments those individuals
affected by this process if they are involved in the planning of this then future efforts and
the design and implementation and funding of these can only be built from broad base
support. I v~rould like to have Paul now bring you up to speed on where w~e started our
notice to proceed was in April vv~e got off to a little bit of a slow start because we couldn't
get everyone mobilized and organized initially. But vve have begun in eamest and as I
Meridian City Council • •
Special Meeting
June 3, 1997
Page 3
said we have begun meeting with the departments. So l will have Paul bring you up to
speed on where (Inaudible).
Marcvlina: As Tom mentioned, we have started the process, w~e have something cal{ed
an activity and task summary that we have sent over to Gary Smith and I guess where
we are in the process of this programming phase would be that we have confirmed the
scope of the programming services that are required, identified those user groups. We
have met with those people on the 8"' of May and let the departments that Mr. Smith
had mentioned as being participants know what our intent was and what the time
requirements might be on their part to meet with us. We have met with Motor Vehicles
at this point, we have met with the Police Department, we have met with City Treasurer
who was very helpful and we covered a lot of ground with her in the administration as a
whole. We do have some questions arising out of that and will probably keep those until
we meet with all of the departments as some of those may be answered when f ineet
with some of the others. We will be having the mechanical and electrical engineers in to
assess the existing buifdings to kind of see what shape they are in and see what
capacity they have for any expansion. Those wiH be assembled and I have sampfes of
the product, some of you are familiar with those from our original presentation. If you
would like to look through those and see how that is going to be accomplished w~e will
do that here yet tonight if you have the time. Otherwise that is where we are and we did
have a good visit to the police department in Nampa. We are in the process of getting
some additional information from Allan Creach over in Nampa who had some work done
from an out of state consultant and he said it was very valuable. That is where woe are,
we are currently setting up more meetings with the staff and they are being as Tom said
extremely cooperative. Everybody is coming to the meetings with a floor plan in their
back pocket so they know what they want. We are in the process of compiling that for
you to take a look at and review.
Zabala: Our schedule (inaudible) in the hands of the Council (inaudible) some time in
early August. (Inaudib~e) Are there any questions that we can answer?
Morrow: I guess Tom, not so much questions but more or less comments. We are
currently undergoing in the City as a Councit some fairly extensive iooks at how we do
business, what is it we are doing. I think what I really suggest is a session with the
Council in terms of direction that we are going as a City which would heavily impact any
type of facility that we are going to have. I think that probably (inaudible) what it is that
we as a Council see in the future v-rith as opposed to what the staff may now see the
future (inaudible).
Zabala: l think that is important because l think staff to their credit (inaudible) and { have
identified (inaudible) they will obviously be interested in identifying their needs for their
particular department heads they see it. t think you as the Council have the vision for
the city and the community as a whole and that wiH be important for us because v~
cannot make those kinds of decisions. We can gather the information and tell you what
Meridian City Council • •
Specia! Meeting
.fune 3, 1997
Page 4
we believe their needs are. You will have to assess that with what you now see as
perhaps the reorganization reorientation of the City.
Morrov+r. One further comment is that atso I want to make sure that we are looking at
this from the standpoint to have either an owned or leased facility. in my own mind 1
think that we are really looking at an interim facility, this buiiding that you see here was
supposed to last forever and it has lasted 9 years or 9'/z years. So I think we are a
ways away from build out yet it may not make sense for us to own a facility over the
next 10 year period. It may make more sense for us to lease, so I want to see a real
hard look at or least a design or a concept plan that includes those as eventualities.
Because it may not be in our best interest to own a facility right away. It may make
more sense for to lease and then buy dirt for the u{timate facility that services a city of
60,000 or 70,000 or 80,000 folk.
Zabala: Mayor and Councilman Morrow, is the Council at this point are you prepared or
in a position to where that work session could take place. Have you had enough
discussion on these types of issues to where we can meet with you at a time and date
in the future.
Morrow. Weil I think v~ne are close enough within a couple of weeks we can do that, we
can't do it tonight. (Inaudible)
Corrie: i think so but it is going to take at least 2 weeks because w~e stiil have some
other meetings v~ have to do. So I would say probabfy within 2 to 3 weeks.
Zabala: That would be good because we can continue our work with the departments
and maybe wi#h tha# and as you begin to think about it or ~nalize your thoughts on it that
vvould a{low us to come to the table with something that we can bounce off of you that
this is wha# you are thinking and this is what that department is saying maybe both have
some validity and we can come to some common ground in there. If you can task
yourself to do that and we will stay in touch with Gary as our intermediary our fightening
rod here to keep you o~ track there. Then ~ would meet with you at your pleasure. !
know you are afl busy individually and collectively as the Council, we will make
ourselves available whether that be an evening or Saturday or eariy morning, whatever
it takes. We are prepared to do that, we v-rould really took forward to do that.
Morrow: Thanks Tom I appreciate that. I have no more questions.
Corrie: Tom thank you, vuoee will give yau the time when v~ee get it together.
Zabala: I think you bring up a good point because the City always anticipates rapid
growth, you never anticipate the time when things might back off a little bit as these
things cycle through. So I think it my be prudent some of the thoughts you brought up
about not overbuilding but still doing some cautious planning.
Meridian City Councif ~ ~
Special Meeting
June 3, 1997
Page 5
Corrie: Thank you very much.
Morrow: i move we adjourn.
Rountree: Second
Corrie: Motion made and seconded we adjourn, all those in favor'? Opposed?
MOTION CARRfED: Ail Yea
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:50 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
APPROVED:
~~3EE~~ ~ EQRR~,-MAa(~
Walt Morrow, City Council President
ATTEST:
~-ru,i
t I '''J~~'~i
~~~~4
~ ~i
i
~r
w
~~ •
l ..
>a ~'~'rts~•
i~4'''/~'Wf~f{~ •
~~~~~a~iu ~~ nu~~'
• •
MERIDIAN ClTY COUNCIL
AGENDA
TUESDAY, JUNE 3, 1997 - 7:30 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD MAY 13, 1997:
(APPROVED~
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1997:
(APPROVED)
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1997:
(APPROVED)
1. TABLED MAY 6, 1997: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR ASHFORD GREENS SUBDIVISION BY
BRIGHTON CORPORATION: (TABLED TO JULY 1, 1997)
2. TABLED MAY 20, 1897: REQUEST FOR A REZONE OF APPROXIMATELY
9.42 ACRES FROM R-4 TO R-15 BY LORIN SAUNDERS: (TABLED TO JUNE
17, 1997)
3. TABLED MAY 20, 1997: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF
APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE TO R-15 BY LARRY ~ KAY HANSEN:
(TABLED TO JUNE 17, 1897)
4. TABLED MAY 20, 1997: ORDINANCE #760 - COMMISSIONS, BOARDS,
COMMITTEES: (TABLED TO JULY 1, 1897)
5. TABLED MAY 20, 1997: ORDINANCE #761 - TRAFFIC SAFETY
COMMISSION: {TABLED TO JULY 1, 1997)
6. ORDINANCE #764 - PACKARD SUBDIVISION NO. 2 ANNEXATION:
(APPROVED)
7. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PACKARD SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BY
PNE/EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION; TABLED MAY 20, 1997: (TABLE TO JUNE
17, 1997)
8. FINAL PLAT: SPORTSMAPI POINTE SUBDIVISION NO. 7, 45 LOTS, SW
CORNER OF LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND, BY WESTPARK CO. INC.:
(APPROVED)
. •
9. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR USE
OF A METAL BUILDING 84' LONG BY 60' WIDE BY GENERAL COUNCIL
CHURCH OF GOD 7T" DAY: (APPROVE FINDINGS; APPROVE AMENDED
QECISION)
10. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO 1400 SQUARE FOOT
HOUSE SIZE REQUIREMENT FOR 447 E. BALDWIN STREET, LOT 6, BLOCK
4 BEDFORD PLACE SUBDIVISION BY WINNIE ARD: (CITY ATTORNEY TO
PREPARE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW)
11. TIME EXTENSION ON RECORDING FINAL PLAT FOR PACKARD
SUBDIVISION NO. 1 PHASE 1: (APPROVE ONE Y~AR EXTENSIQN)
12. TIME EXTENSION ON SUBMITTING FINAL PLAT FOR PACKARD
SUBDIVISION N~J.1 PHASE 2: (APPROVE ONE YEAR EXTENSION)
13. LAMONT KOUBA: LOT SPLIT FOR 835 E. FAIRVIEW AVENUE: (APPROVED)
14. CHARLES & BRENDA MALLARD: LOT SPLIT 3235 S. LINDER ROAD - SW
CORNER OF VICTORY AND LINDER ROADS: (APPROVED)
15. PAULA DEVANEY: DOG LICENSING FOR GUIDE DOGS AND GUIDE DOG
PUPPIES: (CITY ATTORNEY TO AMEND ORDINANCE TO WAIVE FEE, BUT
NOT THE LICENSE~
16. AGREEMENTS WITH JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0. 2: (ICRMP TO REVIEW)
- USE OF LINDER, CHIEF JOSEPH, MERIDIAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:
- SUMMER RECREATION PROGRAM:
17. WATER/SEWERlTRASH DELINQUENCtES: (APPROVED)
18. APPROVE BILLS: (APPROVED)
19. DEPARTMENT REPORTS:
A. GARY SMITH, CITY ENGINEER:
1. BID AWARD FOR EMERGENCY GENERATOR PROJECT: (RE-BID
PROJECT DUE TO OVER BUDGET)
2. FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY ADDENDUM - KELLER ASSOCIATES:
(APPROVED)
B. SHARI STILES, PLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATOR:
1. FAMILY PHYSICIANS CURB CUT ON CHERRY LANE: (SEND LETTER
TO ACHD)
20. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
• •
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 3, 1997
The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor Robert
D. Corrie at 7:30 P.M.:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Walt Morrow, Ron Tolsma, Glenn Bentley, Charlie Rountree:
OTHERS PRESENT: Will Berg, Wayne Crookston, Shari Stiles, Gary Smith, Chief
Gordon, Eric Thompson, A. Palmer, Wayne Williamson, Dixie Lee Roberts, Lois
Schwartsmein, Charles Ward, Lee Stucker, Rodney Boone, Charles Malard, Greg
CrawFord, Troy Schultz, Helen Sharp, Dale Sharp, Boy Scout Troop #164, Wart
Edmonds, Don Palmer, Bob Daugherty, Paula Devaney:
Corrie: Before I start I would like to welcome Meridian Troop #164 the Boy Scouts,
thank you for coming tonight. I hope we can give you some lessons in US Civics class,
if you have any questions raise your hands afterwards and we will help you.
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD MAY 13, 1997:
Corrie: I will entertain a motion on the minutes.
Bentley: So moved
Rountree: Second
Corrie: Motion made and seconded that we accept the minutes of the special meeting
held May 13, 1997 all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1997:
Corrie: If there are no corrections I will entertain a motion that those be approved.
Tolsma: So moved
Bentley: Second
Corrie: Motion made and seconded that we approve the special meeting held May 20
minutes, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
MiNUTES OF PREViOUS MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1997:
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 2
Corrie: Are there any alterations or corrections to those minutes? Hearing none 1 will
entertain a motion they be accepted.
Rountree: So moved
Bentley: Second
Corrie: Motion made and seconded that we approve the minutes of the meeting held
May 20, 1997, all those in favor'? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #1: TABLED MAY 6, 1997: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR ASHFORD GREENS SUBDIVISION BY BRIGHTON
CORPORATION:
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, we still have not accomplished our new irrigation ordinance which
this falls under. I think what I would like to see is us table this to the first meeting in July
to give us an opportunity on the 24"' in our strategic planning meeting to address that
ordinance. By that time each Councilman will have had time to review and should be a
matter of simply input from the staff and then planning session to get that (Inaudible).
Shari has some comments.
Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Councilman Morrow, Council, we do have scheduled on the 24"'
at 6:30 the joint meeting with Ada County Commissioners and the City Council on our
Area of Impact, it is here at 6:30.
Morrow: Well t guess what the issue will be, let's table this to July 1~ which is that first
Tuesday and then what we will have to do is come up with a planninrq session to get
some of this stuff cleared off the table between now and then. fs the 23 acceptable?
Berg: We will just have to look at who has this facility, the school district has this facility,
the schaol district is on Mondays, the Park and Rec Commission meets on Monday, I
think the school district has it on the fourth Monday. So we will make an arrangement
and I will address some dates to you. (tnaudibte)
Morrow. My motion Mr. Mayor would be to table to July 1 St the Ashford Greens variance
request
Bentley: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Bentley to table item 1 to July 1~,
any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Meridian City Council •
June 3, 1997
Page 3
ITEM #2: TABLED MAY 20, 1997: REQUEST FOR A
9.42 ACRES FROM R-4 TO R-15 E3Y LORIN SAUND~
Corrie: Council, you have a requesS by letter by Mr. ~
9 7tn meeting, do I have a motion? _
,
Morrow. So moved
Bentley: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow,
17th meeting, any further discussion?
MOTION CARRIED: Alt Yea
OF APPROXiMAtELY
to table that to the June
l ,
~
~.
s nd by Mr. Bentley to table item #2 until June
A! those in favor? Opposed?
;
ITEM #3: TABLED MAY 20, 1997: REQ~FS7 FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF
APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE TO R-15 BY LARRY & KAY HANSEN:
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, since that is in conjunction or~ running with item #2 the Saunders
issue, I think it would be in their best interest that w~e table that to the 17th also.
Bentley: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Bentley to table item #3 until June
17th, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRlED: All Yea
ITEM #4: TABLED MAY 20, 1997: ORpINANCE #760 - COMMISSIONS, BOARDS,
COMMITTEES:
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I think that we did not address that at our last meeting pending
some further action on both ordinances concerning Commissions, Boards, Committees
and the Traffic Safety. I think it is the desire of the Council to take a look at those at our
planning session at the end of the month. So I would like to table item 4 and 5 to our
July meeting for official action at that time.
Rountree: Second
Corrie: To the July 1~ meeting?
Morrow: Yes
Meridian City Councii • •
June 3, 1997
Page 4
Corrie: Motion is made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree th~t we table items 4
and 5 the two ordinances, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #6: ORDINANCE #764 - PACKARD SUBDIVfSION N0. 2 ANNEXATION:
Corrie: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE NW %4
SECTION 5, T.3N, R.1 E, B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone here that would like to have Ordinance #764 read
in its entirety? Hearing none I will entertain a motion from Council.
Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve Ordinance #764 with suspension of rules.
Tolsma: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. To(sma to approve of ordinance
#764 with suspension of rules, rol! call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Bentfey - Yea, Rountree - Yea, Tolsma - Yea
M4TION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #7: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PACKARD SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BY
PNE/EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION; TABLED MAY 20, 1997:
Corrie: Is there a representative from the Packard Subdivision here tonight?
Morrow: I believe the tabling was a procedural matter so that we could do the
annexation ordinance first.
Rountree: 1 think that and also so that they would have an opportunity to respond to
comments provided previously and incorporate any comments in the preliminary plat. It
is my understanding we haven't seen either of those.
Corrie: Is that correct staff?
Stiles: Yes
Morrow. You have not seen any of the incorporation of the comments from our last
meetings within the preliminary plat?
Stiles: No, v~ had requested some changes to the plat and responses to my comments
and I haven't seen any response.
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 5
Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I am going to ask from Edmonds if he has a response to that.
Corrie: Would you come up here please?
Edmonds: The only thing that I have seen as Pat Tealey sent me a letter I received
yesterday a copy of the one that was in question about the 17 items that Shari wanted
in writing that he had sent to the City clear back in early part of 1996. He sent me a
copy of that and a new copy that he re-answered and sent over. That is the only thing
that I have seen.
Rountree: And you received that yesterday?
Edmonds I received that from Pat Tealey yesterday.
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I guess if Mr. Tealey or someone shows up later we can bring this
back off the tabte. My suggestion would be since v~ have not received the information
that we were after for the time being v~ table this until the 17'n
(Inaudible)
Corrie: Council I,
Bentley: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Bentle~r to table the preliminary plat
of Packard Subdivision No. 2 until the proper to June 17t until the proper credentials
are presented to us and the study by Staff, any further discussion? All those in favor?
Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #8: FINAL PLAT: SPORTSMAN POINTE SUBDIVISION NO. 7, 45 LOTS, SW
CORNER OF LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND BY WESTPARK CO. INC.:
Gorrie: Is there are representative from Sportsman Pointe here tonight? Council,
comments or discussion, staff?
Rountree: I would have a question for staff, Gary have either you or Shari seen a
response to your letter of the 29"'?
Stiles: Yes we have.
Rountree: And is it satisfactory?
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 6
Stiles: Yes
Morrow. Mr. Mayor, then Ms. Stiles and Mr. Smith if there is no presentation here by a
representative by Westpark Company are you comfortable with all of the information
that you have been provided and see an reason that v~ cannot go forward with this at
this juncture?
Stiles: No, I have no problem with this plat.
Morrow. That being the case Mr. Mayor I would move that we approve the final plat for
Sportsman Pointe No. 7 by Westpark Co. Inc.
Rountree: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree to approve the final pfat of
Sportsman Pointe Subdivision No. 7, any further discussion? All those in favor?
Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #9: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR
USE OF A METAL BUILDING 84' LONG BY 60 WIDE BY GENERAL COUNCIL
CHURCH OF GOD 7T" DAY:
Corrie: I will open the public hearing at this time and invite the representative from the
Church of God 7th day to come forward.
Don Palmer, 575 E. Covered Road, Kuna, was sworn by the City Attorney.
Palmer: As I testified before the Planning and Zoning and you probably have gotten the
comments of that and I don't want to rehash too many things on that part over because I
know you have a long agenda. So I will give a brief accounting of what we have done in
the past years. We actually started down on King Street we held our first camp meeting
down on King Street in a little church which is straight east of where the Davis food
store used to be on King Street. We held camp meeting there in a tent. That started
when the first I can remember is when I was 6 and we have been holding camp
meetings every year since. Our camp meeting there was with a tent and we also had a
tent that we used for cooking with. From there why we bought ground down on 2'/z
Street and we started holding camp meetings there in about 54. There we used a tent
and we also built a facility with kitchen and dining hall and also had a publishing house
there that we have used over the years for our publications. Then years later we built a
dome tent, probably some of you can remember and I brought a picture of it so you
might remember. The dome tent we used for well over right on 25 years until we sold
that piece of ground and then moved down to where we are presently. At that place v~
have always used the camp grounds for our parking area. We had our lawn, because it
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 7
is only a yearly function, it is not a weekly function or monthly function. We only hold a
camp meeting on the grounds once a year. So we have use for our parking for our
camp meeting over and above what we had regular for our regular fellowship meetings
has just been our lawns and we have also used our lawns for baseball fields and such
as that down there on the old camp ground. We also have people come and bring tents
and their campers and whatever to stay in there. So v~ have utilized our grounds quite
well in that manner. We use it for the parking and also the City of Meridian until we sold
it most of your parade started off there on our grounds and left there and that is where
you met and used it to start off with for your parades for many years. From where we
have moved to now off of Cherry Lane and we have been holding camp meeting there
and this will be our 8th year we have been leasing a tent we built previously to that a
multi-purpose building for our dining halls, for all of our needs as for as restroom
facilities and these kinds of things. We brought in a 6 inch water line, we have two fire
hydrants there on our own grounds for fire safety. We also brought in an 8 inch line from
the north side of our property for our sewage system. So we have been using this
system and it has met our requiremerrts in this park quite well. When we moved down
there after we got our building done for our dining hall we have been using a tent every
year and it is becoming hard to get a tent that is big enough for our yearly function and
also the Boise River Festival is being held just before ours and they are taking all of the
tents that are availabie. So we are having a very hard time getting tents, they are also
becoming very expensive to rent. So w~e have been using our grounds down there as
we have been on the old one. We have been using our lawns for our yearly function to
park on and for people to put tents or their campers or whatever they have for this
weekly function that we have once a year. It has always been over the fourth of July
weekend so v~ have tried to do that so that people from out of state and long distances
they can take two or three days on their vacation, stop by, be at an old fashioned camp
meeting and go on their vacation. lt has been reaAy quite functional for us. We looked
at moving our old dome down there but we couldn't get anybody that would go through
an engineer so we could use it. And to build another one like it would have cost as
much as what it would to put up a permanent building. So it just hasn't been cost
effective to go ahead and do that. So we have also with our iawns down there put up a
ball field and the church leagues here in the City have used it for a number of years until
this year they have used our ball field in the leagues to play ball. So this year is the first
year they haven't used it for their leagues but it is being used for practice and things
and so it is being utilized quite w~ell. If we put a lot of asphalt dovm on our lawns for a
yearly function then that v-rould take away fram what we use it the rest of the year for.
So we have tried very hard to utilize everything to the best of our ability. We have done
landscaping down there every year we have added to it. We plant more trees, last year
v~e put up a flag pole, I guess you vvduld call it. It is a brick area where people could buy
bricks and we have put their names on a plaque, similar to what the City of Meridian has
down at the park. So that when people donated money in somebody's name or
themse{ves it was put into that. So we have done a lot of things in that manner to make
it look more appropriate and make it look dressed up. So we do try to use our facility so
that it is used in the community as much as possible. And v~ use our lawns like I say in
our camp meeting, that is what v~ have used for our parking, it is only a yearly function
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 8
not weekly or monthly. We use it for seven days and then that is the end of our camp
meeting and then we just have our local church and what is done there normally. I
guess with that.
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, question, Mr. Palmer in the caurse of your normal events the
parking that you currently have that is paved is adequate to handle your events that you
have now?
Palmer: For our v~eekly church service and things yes it is more than adequate for what
we have there for what we have. Our overflow with our camp meeting that is why we
use our baseball field and things for our parking and tents and campers so that people
can use it.
Morrow. I understand, this is over the 4th of July weekend which is typically fairly hot and
if it was asphalt it would be less than comfortable camping is that a fair statement?
Palmer: Very much so, because it is very hot usually over the 4th of July. Also our
supplies and things for our camp meeting we buy most of them here locally from the
merchants in town as far as our foods. We have been buying most of them from Jerry
and Bill's towns and now that they have closed up we also have started buying an awFul
Iot of them from Albertson's and some of the other local stores here. With the number of
people #hat come through and that v~ feed, that doe~ add up to quite a sum of money
that is being spent here locally as far as our event that is here.
Morraw. Another question, aver the 30 years the City of Meridian has jointly used your
facilities when you were not using in terms of staging area and ball fieids and so on and
so forth.
Palmer: The church leagues once we moved down to where we are at not they used
our baseball field in your league program for the churches. This will be the first year it
hasn't been used since we made our baseball field there. It is not a real elite baseball
field like what the City of Meridian has down here at the parks but it served a purpase
and a lot of them use it for practice and our own church league uses it for practice also.
Morrow. Would that use be somewhat diminished by asphalting these particular areas
that we are talking about?
Palmer: Yes it would.
Morrow. Does the chureh plan in the future to allow small practice fields for youth
programs to practice in that what is your off season?
Palmer: The churches have asked to take and be able to use it and a lot of them do use
it for practice and things.
Meridian City Councii • •
June 3, 1997
Page 9
Morrow: I have no more questions?
Rountree: Have you had an opportunity to review the findings of fact and conclusions of
law that were prepared by Planning & Zoning?
Patmer: Yes
Rountree: Do you have any questions or concerns with any of the conditions?
Palmer: I went over the, the main one that seemed to be was the one from the Fire
Chief and 1 met with him Monday and spoke to him about things and we can comply
with that withaut any probfems. The main one would be putting up a lot of asphalt and
things on our yard for a yearly function that v~ only do once a year, we use it for seven
days and then we Hrould have a great big large piece of asphalt that really we couldn't
use for anything eise. For a smali group to put on more than one camp meeting a year
you just wouldn't want to do it. We have no intentions of doing it more than once a year.
Corrie: Any further questions from Council?
Tolsma: Yes, this building is more like a frame work with metal roof and then you will
use the canvas side walls (inaudible)
Palmer: Yes I gave copies
Tolsma: When you are done with the camp meeting you just take the side walls down
(inaudible)
Palmer: Yes the only thing that will be in our building, it will be similar to this right here.
It is just a long structure that is 84 feet long and 60 wide. The back of it and 20 feet
down on each side will be solid sheet metal so that the sound will carry back and not
over bother anybody who is residence anywhere else. We will bring steel down
approximately 7 feet so that we will have about 7 feet of canvas from here around that
we will use. When the camp meeting is over those will be faken down and it wiit be an
open, vacant field there really because the only other things that will be in there will be
electricity for lights and sound system and that will be all. It is a very basic structure
(inaudible) off white so it is not overly bright and yet it will serve the purpose (inaudible}.
Corrie: Any further questions from Council? Anyone else from the audience who v~ould
like to issue testimony at this time?
Lezli Luneskas, 632 West Idaho, Meridian, was sworn by the Gity Attomey.
Luneskas: Hi, I actually am involved because I am the Director of Children's ministries
for our national camp meeting. The asphalt v~ould be a really big problem for what I do
with the kids during that week. It is July and we like to have them outside and get them
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 10
really hyper and wired during the morning so they can takes naps in the afternoon and
be able to get through services at night. So I do a lot of running around with them on
that green space. We utilize probably every foot of it with anything from follow the leader
to the different games v~ set up. Were that to be asphalted I would have so many
problems with injuries and scraped knees and plus just not being able to do a lot of the
games that we do. Children obviously need to be outside at summertime it is a chance
for us to show them a fun time and teach them things. Another thing that I do is utilize a
lot of that grass space and green space for doing special attractions and special events
for them during that week. For example last year we brought in a petting zoo and
utilized part of that. We had a special game afternoon outside. This year w~e are looking
at doing a water balloon festival type of thing. Or some sort of water something I haven't
exactly decided what. But having them do that on asphalt is going to make it really
slippery and I am going to have a lot of injuries and a lot of kids getting hurt and a
program that is not going to be as useful or fun and I am not going to have their
attention as long if I have to keep them inside and off of that green space.
Corrie: Any questions for Lezli? Thank you Lezli
Wayne Williamson, 11535 West Hazeldale Court, Boise, was sworn by the City
Attorney.
Williamson: I think Don has covered most of the things I was going to say. The one
thing that we do have in our organization is rather unique. The churches are all a local
autonomy which probably cuts down on the funds that we get. So the funds are usually
pretty tight around there. I believe that putting in very much asphalt would be an
insurmountable burden to us. The labor is basically done by our local people. We have
skilled people to do this type v+rork so I think we could put up the building fine. The
asphalt would be a financial burden to us. The local church has always been very
cooperative in letting us use their parking area and the access this (inaudible). I don't
know as I have much more to say. Only I do think that the building would be much safer
than a tent in a wind storm it gets quite blustery at times. I think it would look much
nicer and I guess we just appreciate your consideration if you can go along with us for
this variance.
Corrie: Any questions? Thank you Wayne, anyone else from the audience who w~ould
like to issue testimony? Council any questions or discussion?
Rountree: I just ask for comments from staff? Anything to add.
Stiles: Councilman Rountree, Mayor and Council, I guess the only thing that I was
wondering in my comments as ! was reviewing the project whether they met the
conditions for the parking requirements and landscaping requirements even for what
they have existing today. Whether they have the paved parking area as required by
ordinance and whether their landscaping meets landscaping requirements. Not that they
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 11
should displace green space with asphalt just merely that they met the requirements for
existing uses. I guess that wasn't really clear from the site plan that we had.
Corrie: Gary any comments? Any further comments from the Council, questions?
Morrow: Mr. Morrow, I guess from my standpoint I don't have a problem with the
existing things meeting the requirements or whatever. I do think it doesn't make sense
for this type of an event to convert green space to asphalt. So I think that from my
perspective I would like to see the findings reflect that very clearly that additional
asphalt for this event is not required and I offer that for a point of discussion.
Rountree: Are you suggesting then possibly an amendment to these findings or new
findings on this matter to clarify that. I really only find it in one location where it even
mentions the paving.
Morrow I think that the place I found it was the decision and recommendation, I did not
fiind it elsewhere in the findings. I think that from my perspective they could simply be
amended eliminating that reference or clarifying that reference that it not be a
requirement of this conditional use for additional asphalt. I guess the other question
with respect that comes to mind to the existing facility and whether the current load is
sufficient for parking and landscaping is that (inaudible) were they sufficient at the time
that the structure were originally built, does anybody knov~?
Charles Ward, 435 East Columbia, Meridian, was sworn by the City Attorney.
Ward: The question was when the present facilities were constructed is that your
question, the local church was first occupied in the Spring of 1970. The other buildings
other than the large building that Don had reference to that was built just a few years
ago the other building on there v~rould have been built about 74 I believe. So prior to
1976 at any rate.
Morrow: I guess my question is at that particular time were there parking requirements
that v~re addressed in terms of asphalt and landscaping requirements do you recall?
Ward: None that I remember, we were in the County at the time and v~ee were, I don't
even remember if v~; had an impact area that time. We did have a building permit and it
was all done in, we did have a master plan for the entire ten acres at that time. We
complied with everything that was required at that time.
Morrow: I don't think that there were impact areas until after 1976.
Corrie: If you are ready for a decision I will close the public hearing.
Morrow. Shari and Gary do you have any final comments based on the testimony that
has been offered?
Meridian City Council ~ •
June 3, 1997
Page 12
Rountree: I would make a final comment, I would just encourage the church members to
continue their efforts to increase their landscaping and their energies in those directions
as you have indicated you have been doing continually and I think that w~ould be a real
positive addition.
Corrie: I will cfose the public hearing.
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I wrould move that we adopt the findings of fact and conclusions as
prepared for us by P& Z.
Rountree: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree to approve the findings of
fact and conclusions of law as prepared by the Planning and Zoning Commission, roil
calt vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Bentley - Yea, Rountree - Yea, Tolsma - Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I would move that the City Council of the City of Meridian approve
the conditional use permit requested by the applicant for the property described in the
application with the conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law or
similar conditions as found justified and appropriate by the City Council. That the
property be required to meet the water and sewer requirements, fire and life safety
codes, uniform fire code and all of the other ordinances of the City of Meridian. The
conditional use should be subject to review upon notice to the applicant by the City and
a final sentence stating that there will be no paving requirement for the camp ground
area.
Tolsma: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Tolsma, discussion?
Rountree: Just to clarify your motion, no additional paving?
Morrow. That is correct.
Corrie: Any additional discussion? All those in favor of the decision or recommendation
as stated by Mr. Morrov~f? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Meridian City Council ~ •
June 3, 1997
Page 13
ITEM #10: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO 1400 SQUARE
FOOT HOUSE SIZE REQUIREMENT FOR 447 E. BALDWIN STREET, LOT 6, BLOCK
4 BEDFORD PLACE SUBDIVISION BY WINNIE ARD:
Corrie: I will open the public hearing at this time and ask a representative of the request
for variance here this evening.
John Vewig, 11683 West Puritan, Boise, was sv~rorn by the City Attomey.
Vewig: Just a little history on the request, I represent the builder of the home in
question. This request is being made in conjunction with the request by Mrs. Ard, she
asked us to assist in trying to obtain the variance. The situation occurred basically
because when we first starting meeting with Mrs. Ard and looking at the lot that she
wanted to build on the house plan that she wanted to have built was a plan that w~e had
v~uld not fit on the lot. So we narrovved it down and moved a few lines around and tried
to squeeze things to make things fit until she was satisfied with the house plan which
she was. We thought we had ended up with pretty much the same square footage as
when we started which was a 1400 square foot house. Proceeded to build the house
and the discrepancy didn't come to anyone's attention until her appraiser at ciosing did
some measuring and found out that we were about 30 or 40 feet I don't remember
specifically what the number is but we were just a little bit below the 1400 square foot
mark. At that time Mrs. Ard approached us and we agreed to come before the Council
and try to get the variance so that she wrould feel comfortable with the residence. We
have talked to the developer who doesn't seem to have a problem with it and I believe
we have met all of the requirements as far as public notice and sending letters out to all
of the properties adjoining. So that is the basis of the request.
Corrie: Any questions Council?
Rountree: I have a question, I can understand why the developer wouldn't have any
problem with it but is Mrs. Ard owner occupant or is there a contract for purchase or
what is the status there?
Vewig: She has pu~chased the home, she is the owner of record now.
Corrie: Any further questions? Thank you, anyone else in the audience that v~ould like
to issue testimony on this variance request?
Eric Thompson, 497 East Baldwin, Meridian, was sworn by the City Attorney.
Thompson: I live finro houses away from Winnie and my only concern for the variance
would that lower the value of the homes around hers and v~ould that open up the
possibility of other homes within the subdivision that are coming up to say well 1 didn't
quite make the minimum requirements can v~re get a variance also. That would be my
only concem. 1 personally don't feel that is appropriate, the subdivision is a 1400 square
Meridian City Council • ~
June 3, 1997
Page 14
foot minimum. I feel that there were some mistakes made but at the same time I am
looking at it from the cost or the value of the homes around it being depreciated without
(inaudible).
Corrie: Eric I appreciate your concern, any questions of the Council?
Morrow: I think a response to you would be that as near as t have interpreted this Mrs.
Ard is the one that found the mistake and asked for it to be rectifled by asking for the
variance. It certainly didn't have to come forward, it seems like it is an honest mistake.
With respect to devaluing your house, the answer to that is no, appraisals are based on
market supply and demand factors those things move up and down with the market.
Typically they are appraised at a dollar amount per square foot. Your house was 1450
square foot and the going rate per square foot yours would be still worth the $80 and
have more gross value, hers would be worth $SO and have a lesser amount of value.
So no it won't impact the vaiue of your homes. With respect to the last issue is this is an
isolated case where there was a variance found after the fact, it was not found by our
building department in terms of size of the house. It wasn't found by the developer, it
was not found by the architectural control committee for the subdivision. It was found
by an appraiser at financing and apparently was confirmed through the builder and
through Mrs. Ard that it was in fact incorrect. So at that juncture all of the fail safe stops
that were in place failed. So we have methods by which to make sure it doesn't'
happen and somehow it happened. Had it not been for her honest intentions none of us
would Mave ever known including those of your in the subdivision. So I think the answer
is we try very hard as a City and Gary's department and Shari's department do a heck
of a job to make sure that these things don't happen and once in awhile they do. So no
we vvould not a~ a Council look favorably upon somebody coming up and saying I want
to down size (inaudible) buyer beware, it is 1400 square foot minimum and that is what
the subdivision was approved under as by us as a Council and so that is what will be
required.
Thompson: I remember when the house was being built that when it was in the framing
process they found out at that time because I was already moved in and she had come
down that they realized there was a variance there when it was in the framing stage or
shortly thereafter because she was down looking at the house and I went down and
talked to her. She said that she had noted that there was a variance at that time.
Morrow. A variance to the square footage?
Thompson: Yes, that is what my concern was at. It was prior to the house being
completely completed when I was told that there was a variance someplace.
Morrow: According to our information, each of these three items (End of Tape) April
1996, it would be a hardship to all parties to add an additional 32 square feet onto this
house. Item 15, this house was built according to the plans and specs and it was not
discovered until the final appraisal that the house was 1368 square feet instead of the
Meridian City Council ~ ~
June 3, 1997
Page 15
required 1400 square feet. Item 16, all plans and specs indicated that the house was
going to be 1400 square feet, when it was completed and the final appraisal was done
the inspe~tor measured the entire house and at the time discovered that the house was
32 square feet short of a planned 1400 square foot home. That is really all that we have
(inaudible).
Thompson: That is neither here nor there, that was my main concern was would it do
anything to the value of our home.
Corrie: Thank you Eric, anybody else from the public that v~rould like to issue testimony
at this time? Council, discussion or questions of staff?
Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I guess my only comment here is that based on the information that
we have been given by Mrs. Ard it seems to me that it does constitute a hardship and it
was a question where none of this was caused by her. The bottom line is the builder is
having a tough time with the tape measure and calculating square footage which I am
sure will never happen again. So that being the case I don't have a problem with this
variance.
Rountree: I just have a question for Mr. Morrow that at the issuance of a building permit
the plans are reviewed and the square footages are rough checked and we are a party
to this as well.
Corrie: With that comment I will close the public hearing, Council your decision?
Bentley: Mr. Mayor, I would move that v~ne instruct the City Attomey to prepare findings
for a variance for Winnie Ard for 447 E. Baldwin Street, Lot 6, block 4 Bedford Place.
Morrow. S+econd
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley, second by Mr. Morrow to ask for findings of fact
and conclusions of law be drawn up by the City Attomey, any further discussion? All
those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #11: TIME EXTENSION ON RECORDING FINAL PLAT FOR PACKARD
SUBDIVISION NO. 1 PHASE 1:
Corrie: Is there any representative from Packard here to give us some ir~formation on
this extension? Shari?
Stifes: Mr. Mayor and Council they have made the request for an extension for the
ordinance they are allov~d a one time extension on recording a final plat. They are
required to record the final plat within one year of the approval and that will be in June. I
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 16
understand the developer is trying to complete some of the improvements prior to
recording it so they won't be bonding for as many improvements. They just was to
complete the project first. That may not get done by this month. The other part of the
ordinance that they need a time extension on is that they submit phase 2 of Packard
Subdivision No. 1. That is required to submitted in phases of one year. They also are
not going to be able to meet that deadline so they have asked for an additional year to
submit phase 2 on that.
Morrow: That covers both the agenda items then 11 and 12?
Stiles: Yes
Corrie: They are asking for a year on both?
Stiles: Yes
Corrie: Council with your permission we will do 11 and 12 together.
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that v~ grant the extensions of one year for both
items 11 and 12 from fhe effective date (inaudible).
Rountree: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree to extend one year the
date or the extension of the Packard Subdivision No. 1 phase 1 and No. 1 phase 2. Any
further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #13: LAMONT KOUBA: LOT SPLIT FOR 835 E. FAIRVIEW AVENUE.
Corrie: Is Mr. Kouba here?
Daugherty: My name is Bob Daugherty I am with Johnson Land Surveying and we are
here tonight on behalf of Mr. Lamont Kouba. We had previously been approved a
conditional use permit 9-96 for a piece of property situated at 835 East Fairview
Avenue. As you may recall there was a single family residence located on the premises
which was in between Rountree Chevrolet and Meridian Auto Sales. Mr. Kouba's
intentions were to construct a retail facility on the northern portion of that property and
the southern portion was going to be conceptual in nature and geared towards the
automotive industry service type businesses. Since that time Mr: Kouba has entered
into a sales agreement with tHro individuals, a Mr. Steve Lyons and Steve Bainbridge to
sell off the northern portion of that property where the retail facility was going to be
placed. Their intention is to buifd or construct a futl service car wash with fuei facilities. A
conditional use permit application has already been filed and has going through the
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 17
public hearing stage at the Planning and Zoning Commission levei. During our initial
application we had proposed a drive entering onto the property ftom the west side of our
property. We had run into some difficulties with ACHD with the location of the driveway
in relationship with a driveway at Meridian auto sales. So they w~ere requiring that woe
remove the drive to the east side of our property which w~ould border on the side of
Rountree Chevrolet. Rountree had previously left a 40 foot strip vacant to access the
rear of their property for possible future development. It was determined at that time tha#
if vve constructed our entryway on the east side of our property that they w~ould na
fonger be able to use that, their proposed entry to access that back portion of their lot.
We had entered irrto an agreement with that property owner, I use the term Rountree
because they are the people that currently have the lease on that property. The property
is actually owned by Mrs. Johnson. We had entered into an easement agreement to
utilize that 40 foot strip to access our entire parcel. That 40 foot strip goes the entire
(ength of our property on the east side. As a result of that easement w~e would no
longer have access off of Fairview Avenue direct lot access off of Fairview Avenue per
ACHD's requirements. I guess the only reason that w~ are before you tonight is
because what it will do is create a technically land locked parcet. In reality w~e don't feel
that it will be a land locked parcel because w~e do have that 40 foot easement that will
service that southern portion of the property. The sales agreement that lamont, Mr.
Kouba has ~igned with Mr. Bainbridge and Mr. Lyons requires the canstruction of that
40 foot easement to be made in a timely manner. For those funds to be set aside in
escrow to make sure that is done. So in doing so w~e don't feel that we are jeopardizing
any type of access to #hat southem portion and I guess ultimately Mr. Kouba is fully
aware of the situation and what has been created here, he is certainly wifling to db that
in order to sell that northem portion. What we are doing here this evening is just asking
your permission to do this.
Bentley: 1 have a question on tMis 40 foot easement, you said you are going to have him
bond to construct is, is that the full length of both pieces of property or just bond for the
front piece?
Daugherty: That would be the full length, the full 40 foot roadway easement. If you have
on the very back of your packets there I believe you have the picture. That 40 foot
easement in its entirety w~ould be constructed.
Bentley: Clear back to Danbury?
Daugherty: 20 feet off of Danbury.
Tolsma: This 40 feet that you plan on here you say Rountree has 40 feet on their side
also?
Daugherty: No, that is the 40 foot easement, that easemcnt shown is errtirely on their
property.
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 18
Tolsma: (inaudible)
Daugherty: The 40 foot easement is entirely on their property that is eorrect. We have a
recorded easement that I believe is part of your packet that shows that has been
recorded and granted to Mr. Kouba and or his assigns for permanent roadway
easement.
Tolsma: So the property you are going to split ofF is just for the car wash (inaudible).
Daugherty: That is correct the shaded in area to the north.
Bentley: I would like to hear from staff on their thoughts on this.
Stiles: Councilman Bentley, Mayor and Council, I believe that this the applicant and his
representative has been thorough in this application. It only makes sense that frontage
along Fairview is going to be desirable for the commercial property. With some of the
frontages there it is not going to allow a full width roadway since they do have the
recorded easement in place and it is going to pass to their heirs and successors. I see
no problem with granting the lot split, the reason he is requesting this even though w~e
allow the one time lot split and it is not in our ordinance, any time there is a lot split it is
called a subdivision in our ordinance. We have been going along with what the County
does as far as allowing that one time split. With this proposed split there is no frontage
and that is the reason that he has come in to make this request to ensure that there is
no problem with selling off that front portion. There is a development agreement
required Lyons and Bainbridge who have proposed the car wash they are aware of that
development agreement requirement and Mr. Kouba on the back portion of this is also
aware that he will have to enter into a development agreement at such time that he
develops that back portion. Did that answer your question?
Bentley: Thank you
Corrie: Any further questions? Thank you
Morrow: Counselor, Shari is correct we don't have a forma) one time split w~e require
the formal subdivision process for the one time split in the County. I guess some
guidance with respec# to this application.
Crookston: Under our ordinance it is a splitting of property it is a division. It is under our
ordinance a subdivision plat is Fequired to do this.
Morrow. Shari then in this process are we going to see a subdivision plat filed for this
split to occur?
Stiles: I hope not
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 19
Crookston: I think that it means that a variance v~rould have to be requested.
Stiles: Since I started this job three plus years ago, my predecessor had given me the
instruction that was the way it was to be done that we allowed the one time split. We
have been allowing the one time split, probably even before Wayne Forrey was here
maybe Gary could attest to that. Jack Niemann had written numerous letters I found in
the file saying they are allowed a one time split as long as they meet the requirements
of the ordinance as far as lot size and the frontage requirement w~e have routinely been
allowing a one time split.
Morrow: That was a matter of policy not of ordinance so we don't have a formal
structure to do that. Which we need to do post haste.
Rountree: I have a question for Wayne or Shari or both, what did woe do with Albertson's
at Cherry Lane and Meridian?
Crookston: They started out initially coming in with a subdivision plat then we got into
the probiem with water.
Rountree; No vve are talking about Cherry Lane and Meridian Road, the old Albertson's.
Crookston: That was established prior to our ordinance and, but they have since come
in with a subdivision plat.
Corrie: Wel! Council it looks like you can do one of twn things here.
Morrow. What might that be?
Corrie: Well you can ask for a variance or you can ask for a subdivision, actually there
are three, one time split and do the ordinance post haste as you said.
Morrow. Well that would be my preference. (Inaudible) staff has got it pretty w+ell
covered I think that what we do is from my perspective is we grarrt the one time split and
then we also come back (inaudible) so my motion w~ould be that w~e grant the one time
lot spli# for Lamont Kouba at 835 E. Fairview Avenue.
Rountree: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree, any further discussion?
All those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
1TEM #14: CHARLES & BRENDA MALLARD: LOT SPLIT 3225 S. LINDER ROAD -
SW CORNER OF VICTORY AND LINDER ROADS:
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 20
Mallard: Our request is, well first we are outside the City of Meridian city limits but we
are within the impact area. Our request is for permission from the City of Meridian that
we rezone our property from an RT to an R1 status. Presently we have a home on our
property, we have 5'/ acres, we have a house. We have our in-laws mobile home there
on a conditional use permit and a bam. Presently vve have available a one time split, we
are eligible for that. We are wanting to take advantage of that one time split sell off the
old house and build a new home, remove the mobile home from the property and allow
my in-laws with us into a mother-in-law quarters. My in-laws both have had heart
surgeries in the past, recently my father-in-law has gone through colon cancer and he
has had some heart problems in the recent years. Financially they are just making and
we were wanting to, if anything goes wrong with their home I don't have the funds to
cover that. Utilities and everything if they move in with us I would pay for all of that
being under our house. So our proposal is to take advantage of that one time split. In
order to do that we must rezone to an R1. I don't propose to go any farther than just
rezoning to an R1. The cost of subdividing and coming up with 5 1 acre pieces is
possible but the costs are horrendous and v~rould not justify such an action. Besides we
have neighbors, we feel like what we are doing here by maybe keeping 3 acres or 3'/z
and selling t~nro was more compatible with what the neighborhood is. We wouldn't want
to go and put five homes right there and make the neighbors unhappy. What w~e are
proposing we feel like fits in with the surrounding area. It would be beneficial for us and
for our in-laws. The reason f am here is because I haven't gone through the formal
rezone permit with Ada County. In the process of finding out my property status and
being eligible for a one time split they recommended that I contact the City of Meridian
and get their permission or see what they would feel in this matter. That is why we are
here tonight.
Rountree: Just to get on the record that each dwelling would be in excess of an acre?
Mallard: Right, I have a drawing there and I proposed from a 1'/ to a 2'/z that v~ v~rould
sell with the existing home. We haven't quite determined what w~e w~ould like to do. We
would like, we are just trying to pursue this and see what v~ can do and then what
would be the best fit there we will decide down the road. Somewhere in betw~een that
probably, 1'/ to 2'/. We would like to retain at least 3 acres.
Morrow. Mr. Mayor, (inaudible) my question would be is according to your application
your comments here is that you are having the mobile home removed.
Mallard: We will yes.
Morrow: The net result is that there are still two dwelling units on the 5.5 acres. If I
understood this correctly there is only one well?
Mallard: There is only one well.
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 21
Morrow. Will a new well be drilled for the new
Mallard: We would have to have a new well for the new home.
Morrow: And you would utilize the existing septic system?
Mallard: If possible, if we go to 2'/z acres it probably v~rould not be possible. If v~ sold
just 1'/z acres it would be possible to use that existing drain field. The drain field was
put in 1990 when we put in the mobile home. In fact my drain field on our house was put
in at that same time too.
Morrow: I have no further questions. Question for Shari, is there some sort of formal
action that we need to take here such as a letter to the County?
Stiles: In the past the County has taken a non-response meaning there was no concern
on the part of the City. I think because of some of the recent discussions they are being
a little more aware of our comprehensive plan and our desire to follow that
comprehensive plan. Our comprehensive plan policy does state that in the rural
residential areas there is a minimum of 5 to 10 acre per home. I w~ould hate to see this
come up on every single piece of property in our area of impact. But I think in certain
cases you have to look at it on a case by case basis. The fact that they have a mobile
home there now and are willing to remove it and put on a real home or construct a
home on the property. I think that is a plus as long as they meet Central District
Health's requirements and Department of Water Resources requirements and stick with
the 2'/z acre minimum there. There are some acre lots I believe just to the south of this
five acre piece. And then kitty corner to the NE there are some more I am not sure, they
are less than 5 acres 1 believe.
Morrow. So generally you have no problem with this and probably it is appropriate for us
given Ada County's deal to send a letter from the City saying we don't have a problem
with this.
Stiles: In this particular, if that is the way the Council goes. I mean, I cannot change
what your policy is. If Council desires to allow this just hopefully we don't see it on every
piece of property that comes up.
Morrow: I guess from my perspective, point of discussion I don't have any problem with
this.
Bentley: I don't have a problem with this either but t w~ould like to see us start notifying
the County on some of these issues. We have made it a very strong point that w~ want
to be notified when something is happening in impact areas and I think w~e need to
return the courtesy by letting them know yea or nay on what we want to see.
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 22
Stiles: They will have to ~ubmit an application to the County and submit it to us for
comment. t think they were just letting them know before they spent their money come
to City Council and make sure there was no objection.
Corrie: Any further discussion? Council, I will entertain a motion.
Morrow; Mr. Mayor, I w~ould move that we forvvard to the County a letter showing our
approval of this split for the Mallards and recommend that they approve it.
Rountree: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree to send a letter to the
County for approval of this split? Any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRtED: All Yea
ITEM #15: PAULA DEVANEY: DOG LICENSING FOR GUIDE DOGS AND GUIDE
DOG PUPPIES:
Corrie: Paula?
Devaney: I am here tonight to request and I was, 1 don't have a copy of the ordinance
for dog licensing I am sorry, but Franklin is here also tonight to represent the program.
What this program is, it is guide dogs for the blind, these are guide dog puppies in
training. They are born in California and then they are raised by puppy raisers
throughout the nation for 15 to 18 months before they are returned to the school to be
trained as guide dogs. Most of the dogs are raised by kids in the 4H program. They do
sometimes make exceptions and !et adults have them if you beg enough which I did.
Generally #hey are raised by young people in the 4H program the only, they are in
charge of everything for the dog, paying for their food, the veterinarian care is paid for
by the school in California. Or in my case the Meridian vets are really great and they
dbnate part of it. Since it is usually done by kids we v~re hoping that the licensing fee
not the IiGensing requirement the licensing fee for the guide dog puppies and hopefully if
a guide dog is returned to our community and v-rorks as a guide dog or an assistance
dog that fee would also be raised for the person needing that assistance from the dog.
Also we don't have a choice whether the dogs are spade or neutered, that comes from
the schooi and I know the fee varies from that. tt seems like a nominal amount and for
me it would be, but like I say normally this program is for kids in 4H. That is why w~e are
coming tonight to see if w~e can get the fee waived, not the requirements but just the fee
for guide dogs and guide dog puppies in training.
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I have to tell you from my perspective I did read the Readers Digest
version of this particular story and I am a strong supporter of the concept. I do think that
part o# govemment's job or its main job is to help folk that are having a tough time and I
very candidly think that we ought in fact to waive those fees.
Meridian City Council ~ ~
June 3, 1997
Page 23
Rountree: I am inclined to agree and the only question I would have or comment is that I
think it is important that the dogs are licensed or identified in some way and I am sure
you have a process to do that or would you?
Devaney: The dogs are very well identified, they are tattooed in both ears, they also
always have their guide dog tags on that ident~es them as a guide dog. It is still very
important that they get a city license because if they were to get loase heaven forbid
they would be picked up by the City. So we strongly encourage all the puppy raisers to
license the dogs it is just that v~e were hopping that we could waive the fee.
Come: That would require a variance or do an ordinance change.
Crookston: Well the variance is reatly for zoning and bwilding. The only thing that I
would have to say about it is that I think the licensing requirement is the only way the
city gains knowledge as to whether or not the pets have received their shot. There
would have to some kind of ineans to determine that the dogs have received their
appropriate shots.
Devaney: That is why 1 am saying that all o the requirements are still met they w~ould
have to take in the proof of rabies vaccination they woutd have to ge# the license, it is
just that they w~ould not have to pay the $5 or $10, but everything else would be exaetly
the same. Be it a guide dog or a guide dog puppy.
Crookston: The other concem that 1 have and as blind as I am almost I can appreciate
the need for guide dogs. But I think the concern is also that if we allow this group to do it
and then somebody else comes in and has a different aspect then we then allow those
dogs not to be or waive the fees for those dogs and then the next time somebody
comes in and says they don't want to license their vehicle the next time somebody
comes in is they wan't to have their trailer licensed (inaudible)
Corrie: I guess Council we can do whatever you please.
Morrow. Mr. Mayor, let me ask you this, it is an ordinance or a resolution with respect to
the licensing procedure.
Crookston: It is an ordinance.
Morrow: So we v~ould need to amend the ordinance to allow an exception for licensing
fees #or guide dogs and guide dogs in training.
Crookston: That is correct, and I think you need to establish some means of
determining the dogs are in the guide dog program rather than having somebody walk
in and say wel! this dog is a guide dog.
Meridian City Council • ~
June 3, 1997
Page 24
Devaney: Each dog comes with an actual identification card that matches the tattoo in
its ear.
Morrow: And you could provide us with that help could you not?
Crookston: We would need that, some way to determine that the dog is actually in a
licensed guide dog program.
Devaney: They also where the little green coats that nobody else can get bwt they do
come with an identification card that has the tattoo number that matches their ears.
Carrie: Maybe we ought to do that for attorneys.
Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I would move that we instruct the City Attomey to prepare an
amendment to the dog licensing ordinance to allow for the waiving of fees but not
licensing for guide dogs or guide dogs in training. And subject the verification of that to
conditions that we will provide to him from Ms. Devaney.
Rountree: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree to instruct the attomey to
work on the new ordinance, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Corrie: Thank you Paula, we appreciate that.
Rountree: Paula, how many are you taking about trying to get going?
Devaney: Well right now in our immediate group there are six in this group, but only one
of them is inside the City of Meridian. But as I take him more and more places I am
getting a sense that w~e could almost form a whole other group. The problem is having
guide dog leaders to lead them.
Rountree: Do you have any more information on that?
Devaney: On the guide dog program? Yes I do
Rountree: In addition to what woe have here.
Devaney: I do have ir~formation, I am not sure what all information you would want.
Rountree: I have an individual that might be interested.
Devaney: I have the name of the lady to call to get a national application.
Meridian City Council ~ •
June 3, 1997
Page 25
Morrow. Mr. Mayor if I might offer this, this is a real noble pursuit and I would like our
goad friends from the press to do something to encourage us as citizens within
Treasure Valley to participate and hopefully at some point w~e can become our own
supplier for our own citizens. It is my understanding we don't have a lot of this in our
area now.
Devaney: We are getting more of them, I know I have seen several w~orking guide dogs
in the community, particularly when I go to Costco. In terms of training it is a very
di~cult thing to ask a person to take a puppy and keep it for 18 months and then give it
away. It takes a lot of time and they really want the dog to be with you all of the time
and I have already had some resistance and that is where the papers could come in
and be helpful to say that these dogs have the same right according to Idaho Code.
They have access to all public places and believe it or not I got asked to leave
Albertson's with him.
Morrow: So can you guys give us a hand?
ITEM #16: AGREEMENTS WITH JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2
Corrie: I guess Council you have the agreement here and then you also if I am correci
you have a memo from Kurt Anderson who is with ICRMP in reference to the contract.
Counselor, what v~ould your suggestion that we do with reference to this?
Crookston: My suggestion is that we let Mr. Anderson let him give us the input because
they are our insurer. If nothing more than that let them approve what we are doing
because they have some liability in it. Because they are our insurer.
Rountree: I agree that we need to (inaudible) 1 will move that we have the agreement
reviewed by the Loss Control Manager for ICRMP with comments back to the City
within two weeks of this evening.
Morrow. Second
Corrie: A motion made by Mr. Rountree, second by Mr. Morrow on the follow to have
the review and retum it to us with comments within the two week period, any further
discussion? All those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #17: WATER/SEWER/TRASH DELINQUENCIES:
Corrie: Delinquencies for turn off schedule for 6-11-97. This is to inform you in writing if
you choose to you have the right to a pre-determination hearing tonight at 7:30 p.m. on
Tuesday, June 3, 1997 before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person and be
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 26
judged on the facts and defend the claim made by the City that your water, sew~er and
trash billing is delinquent. You may retain counsel and this service will be discontinued
on June 11, 1997 unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who
wishes to contest their water, sewer and trash delinquency. You are hereby informed
that you may appeal the decision of the City reviev~d by the Fourth Judicial District
Court pursuant to Idaho. Even though they may appeal your water will be shut off. The
amount of the shut off list is $28.882.51. Council, 1 will entertain a motion to approve the
turn off list.
Morrow. So moved
Rountree: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree to approve the
delinquency turn off list, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #18: APPROVE BILLS:
Morrow. I move that w~e approve the bills Mr. Mayor.
Tolsma: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Tolsma to approve the bills, all
those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #19: DEPARTMENT REPORTS:
Smith: Mr. Mayor and Council, the first item I have is a bid award request for the
emergency generator project. I think that you have in your packet, I guess it is a v~rk
listing from Custom Electric and let me pass out to you a copy of the bid results. Mayor
and Council the bid was opened on May 8 and we had two bidders. Custom Electric
was the apparent low bidder at $256,804.90 and it was immediately apparent to Brad
Watson and I that the last three bid items 6, 7 and 8 should be deleted because the
amounts that were offered by both bidders were way out of line. A question came into
my mind that the emergency generator for Well No. 14 bid item 3 was probably out of
line because it was a lot less work in providing that generator than there was to provide
the generator at the waste water treatment plant. So Brad and I met with the low bidder
Custom Electric and in that meeting I said we want to because this is beyond our
budget for the well we need to have you take a look at this bid item 3 or w~e would like
for you to take a look at this bid item 3 and also v~ are going to delete bid items 6, 7
and 8. The contractor agreed to delete those three bid items from his bid and he agreed
Meridian City Council ~ ~
June 3, 1997
Page 27
to look at Well No. 14. The other sheet that was in your packet from Custom Electric is a
result of his looking at re-looking at the bid item. He did cor~fess to us in that meeting
that he had not been to the site to look at that Well No. 14. So the net result was that
he reduced the price on bid item 3 approximately $9000, $9500.
Morrow: (Inaudible) The next question v~rould be what is your comfort level here with
this? Glenn makes a good comment that if you are not looking at the site is the person,
are we getting good numbers, do we have a competent installer.
Smith: We have a competent installer, I don't have a problem with him because he did
work for us before on Well No. 16, installed the electrical system out there. So I don't
have a problem with qualifications.
Morrow. How many folk sent proposals to you (inaudible).
Smith: We had four or five plan holders, electrical contractors holding plans. Out aF that
only one electrical bid and Tumkey bid as a general. Tumkey used Custom Electric as
their subcontractor for the electrical.
Corrie: Gary, you said you were concerned about the cost of the emergency generator
and it looks like they only dropped that around $450 was that in your thoughts?
Smith: No they dropped the cost on Well No. 14 generator $9500. I don't have a
particwlar problem with the bid the way it exists now. Unfortunately as you all have the
same suspicions in mind that I have is that he has gone back out and he has looked at
the site again and he is not bidding against anybody for this item #3. He is submitting a
price that he is comfortable with and (End of Tape) He is a good contractor there is no
doubt about it and he knows what he is doing, he did an excellent job for us on Well No.
16.
Corrie: Council do you want to apprave it or
Rountree: I have a question for Gary if I can remember what it was. You offered
Custom Etectric because they were the apparent low bidder and opportunity to give us
new figures, shouldn't we do the same thing to Turnkey?
Smith: Wetl, I think this was a ham and egg deal I really do. They are both w~orking
together on this project. I shouldn't say v~orking together, one is using the other.
Custom is using Tumkey and vice versa. There were no other, no one else offered a
bid, apparently they are busy enough that they just don't have the time to do the work.
Rountree: What is the timing on getting this done, is it critical?
Smith: I think it is much more critical at the waste water plant than it is at Well No. 14.
We are operating on the edge of what the generator system will provide for us out there
Meridian City Council ~ •
June 3, 1997
Page 28
right now. Especially in light of getting the new primary when we have the new primary
on line. We will be beyond 1 guess the safety factor of having enough power to operate
that on an emergency basis without this upgrade.
Morrow. (Inaudible) splitting out the waste water treatment thing and going with that
(inaudible) and then rebidding in 30 days or so the Well No. 14, does that make any
sense?
Smith: I guess I can certainly make the request of the low bidder and see if that w~ould
work, we would need to repair some different bid documents #or just bidding the Well
No. 14.
Morrow: Follow up question, what are you instincts telling you on this thing?
Smith: We had an estimate from the electrical engineer for the equipment delivered to
the site on a truck. I believe that there were two different generators that w~ere
available, omen was one, I don't remember the name of the other, Koehler. One was
$40,000 some and one was $50,000 something. They bid the Omen, now there is an
extra expense here in terms of the contractor that has the job, having a crane there to
unload the generator and preparing a pad to set the generator on. So if you use the low
estimate that v~ne received of $40,000 then that means that he had $16,000 in there to
unload it, prepare the concrete slab and base and so forth, and set the thing in place,
unhook and let the truck drive away. I don't know if that number, how unrealistic it is, it
seems e little high. I don't know, if we rebid it we are going to get the same kind of
response that we got before. Maybe v~e have to wait.
Tolsma: (Inaudible)
Smith: Requirement of course for any City vvork is that they have to be a licensed public
works contractor and I don't know whether those people are as equipment suppliers or
not. But you need a contractor because there is construction work to be done. You
need some building work, remodeling concrete and then you have to have an efectrical
contractor to hook the thing all up and get it running.
Corrie: Is that included in that $16,000?
Smith: No, well the No. 4 electrical modifications was $23Q0 that provided a connecting
device, I can't tell you the name of it from the generator to the existing electrical panel.
Morrow. Mr. Mayor, does it make any sense for us to buy the generator for ourselves
and then just sub out the hook ups and the pads and those types af things?
Smith: We can certainly go through that process and we are doing exactly that with the
Ashford Greens Lift Station, w~e are buying the iift station can itself and tMat was set up
in the bid documents such that w~e provide that or we bid that separately. We have a
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 29
supplier for that piece of equipment. The contractor that is going to build the woet well
includes in his price the installation of that equipment that we are supplying. We can
certainly dq that.
Morrow. Do not the warranties for that equipment come from the manufacturer anyway,
the contractor is not going to provide the warranty for the generator. So what is the
benefit to us to pay them their mark ups and that kind of stuff (inaudible).
Corrie: I guess my question to you Mr. Morrow in your experience is $16,000 a lot of
money for a crane and a pad?
Morrow. Sure seems like it.
Tolsma: Well I was questioning the generator, that is about double (inaudible).
Smith: Well as an example and this was a couple of years ago, Well No. 15 we had a
200KVV generator that was bid in there at $36,000.
Tolsma: That is what 1 mean.
Smith: That was 200KW this is a 275 and I don't know how the price goes with KW if it
is straight line or (inaudible)
Tolsma: (Inaudibte)
Smith: Like I say, the two that came from the electrical engineer w~ere the Onan and the
Koehler those were the two that they had budget prices on. I don't know specifically
which generator Custom Electric bid but those v~re the two that w~e had budget prices
on for the equipment.
Morrow. I guess from my perspective to move on here 1 think that I would really like to
reject the bids and take a look at (inaudible) restructure the bids to move on. Maybe
have our staff do some research as to just like w~e have done on lift stations. Certainly, I
don't see any advantage here of having the contract provide it, he is not providing us
(inaudible) nothing beyond, there is nothing in terms there is no real reason for him to
supply the part and Charge us an up charge because he has no liability. So I think I am
uncomfortable with this bid. That is my discussion.
Rountree: 1 agree with that as long as the time is not a critical factor here and we have
time to rebid it ! think that it probably wise from a couple of standpoints. One in terms of
cost and one in terms of the possibility of the tvvo of them coming at us for bid shopping
or whatever they think might happen with going to the low bidder and asking for a cost
reduction and not giving the opportunity to the other bidder.
Meridian City Council ~ •
June 3, 1997
Page 30
Corrie: Any further comments from Council? Hearing none I will entertain a motion of
your pleasure.
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we reject the bids for the emergency generators
from both Custom Electric and Turnkey and that we instruct the City Engineer to rebid
by splitting out some of the parts and pieces at his discretion.
Tolsma: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Tolsma to reject all bids and
instruct the Engineering department to reschedule the bids, any further discussion?
Crookston: 1 think that there should be a statement or a finding that or a reason as to
why you are rejecting the bids. I am not saying that you are doing wrong, I think we just
need on the record as to why you desire to reject the bids.
Morrow. Well just a question to Gary is that normally, do v~ need to do that in terms of
how we have done it in the past?
Smith: I think that is probabty appropriate, 1 don't remember that we have rejected one. I
take it back, we have rejected a bid, we have not chosen a low bidder for specific
reasons we have gone a second bidder. We have stated a reason for that and I think
that is probably very appropriate that we do state a(inaudible).
Tolsma: (Inaudible) we didn't offer it to the other one.
Morrow. I guess my response to that Mr. Tolsma I think we can reject a bid by simply
stating that the bids are higher than we anticipated spending.
Tolsma: Over budget.
Morrow: So Mr. Mayor 1 would like to amend my motion to indicate that we are rejecting
the bids because they are over budget and we are instructing the City Attomey to rebid
by breaking out various parts and pieces.
Crookston: Why don't you instruct the City Engineer to do that.
Morrow. I wish to instruct the City Engineer not the City Attorney to rebid this project
and breaking out the parts and pieces that we can provide ourselves and then drawing
a list of specifications to be competitively bid.
Tolsma: Second
Corrie: All those in favor? Opposed?
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 31
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Smith: The second item is the proposal from Keller and Associates to upgrade our
facilities plan study, it is about 3 years old and it needs to be updated to reflect the
changes that we have seen in our community in terms of growth. I think that you
received a copy, the copy that you received was not of the agreement but it was of the
scope of services. The only thing that is appropriate on the back that was a(inaudible)
break down and that was part of is part of this contract. Keller's, Jim Keller is
proposing to do this on a time and material basis with a not to exceed.
Morrow. Is the not to exceed the $48,168 number on the last page?
Smith: Yes, actually the way it reads on the basis of payment is the services described
in attachment A which you have a copy of shall not exceed $44,304 and then $3,864 for
the environmental information document.
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the proposaf by Ke11er and
Associates in the amount not to exceed the $44,304 and for the environmental portion
the $3,864 for a grand total of $48,168.
Rountree: Second
Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree on the motion as stated,
any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed?
MOTIQN CARRIED: A!I Yea
Corrie: Chief?
Gordon: Nothing
Corrie: Shari?
Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, you are familiar with the James Fuller prope~ty at the
NW comer of Ten Mile and Cherry Lane that they came before us before with the
rezone to an LO and also wanted a conditional use permit for a convenience store. That
was rejected by Council, but the rezone to LO was accepted. As part of their conditions
of approval for the rezone and conditional use permit the Ada County Highway District
Commissioners allowed an access on Cherry Lane and an access on Ten Mile Road
with the access on Cherry Lane to be a right in and right out with the median. When the
applicants for the Family Physicians of Meridian center came into the City to find out
what the requirements were on that site I let them look in the files. They saw that Ada
County Highway District had made those comments, they designed their site in
accordance with those comments and since there were no additional applications
required proceeded to get the site plan review through the City Council. As late as May
Meridian City Council ~ •
June 3, 1997
Page 32
15th Ada County Highway District Commissioners met to discuss as appeal because
staff had changed their mind on the curb cut on Cherry Lane, now telling them it had to
be eliminated and that Commissioner Richardson's response was if you need two
accesses maybe you better get another site. This was after foundation permit had been
issued, they had cleared the site they are ready to go. There had never been any
indication that they would not be able to have that curb cut and I really don't think it is
reasonable that cut be eliminated. The fire department has also requested that cut stay
where it is at. Otherwise they have one way in and one way out. I just don't see what
the reasoning is except for the new policy once again. So I would ask th~t you look that
letter over and if, it is pretty mild I think.
Bentley: I have a real problem with what they want to do, because what they are going
to do is they are going to have traffic backing up clear through tha~t intersection trying to
make a left turn into there. I would agree that both of those cuts need to be put in.
Morrow. Mr. Mayor, what I would like to see here is a letter drafted up and the five of us
sign the letter and send it to them as quidciy as possible. If you could get the thing
drafted up so that the guys that are leaving town can sign is real quick and the rest of us
can slide in and sign it in the moming.
Stiles: If you want to look at that letter and make any comments that you want to do.
Morrow: (Inaudible)
Stiles: 1 don't think I w~ould make too many changes, ! might refine it just a little bit but
basically I told them the factg. !f you want something stronger in there feel free to add it
yourself.
Corrie: How soon do you want to send this letter Shari?
Stiles: They would like it as soon as possible since it is going to be a major problem to
them if it is not permitted. If it needs to wait until Monday.
C4rrie: I was going to say perhaps Mr. Morrow is correct if it has all of our signatures on
it, it is going to have a little more weight perhaps. And if we can wait until Monday when
we can afl sign it I will hand deliver the thing for you.
Stiles: You would hand deliver it to the Commissioners?
Corrie: Absolutely, I feel as strongly as you do on this one. I think Mr. Morrow is correct
that it would hold more weight if it had all of our signatures on it. If the Council agrees,
then why don't you write up the letter and vve wil) have all of our signatures there and I
will hand carry it them.
Meridian City Council ~ •
June 3, 1997
Page 33
Stiles: Weil except for maybe tMe ending there I don't think that I v~rouid change a whole
lot. If you want to review that letter and make any changes you want or make any
suggestions for change I would be glad to do it. We are free until midnight aren't we?
Corrie: It is up to you Shari, if everybody has read it (inaudible) Mr. Crookston?
Crookston: 1 just had a comment that if it was not going to be done tonight Shari could
change the letter to the extent to say that she had brought this up before the City
Council and that they approved of the letter unanimously. (Inaudible)
Corrie: Anything else? Mr. Morrow'?
Morrow. Only two things, do we have the agreement between us and Boise State in
terms of the old sew~er plant site and them utilizing the facility for their educational
program. I believe the instructions were a couple of months ago to meet with Amanda
Horton to get that issue resolved.
Crookston: I met with Amanda Horton, I have not drawn up what needs to be done with
that but I wilt.
Morrow. The moving date is coming up here directly. The next issue is that on the 4"'
July at the Speedway we typically have the events of that evening including firev~orks, 1
think we ne~d to waive the 11:00 o'clock rule because that is about the time that the
firev-rorks and evening festivities go on. So have v~ done that in the past or how do we
handle that Bill?
Gordon: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Morrow, it has not been an issue, there has not been
anything done in the past.
Morrow. Is it an issue that we need to be concemed about?
Gordon: No sir l don't think it would be, it hasn't been. It is usually over by 11:00 they
usually start at about 10:15 or 10:30 and it is usually over by 11:00 or real close to it.
Morrow: So if it carries over and they have their music and dances or whatever
barbecue that might go on with it, it is not an issue on that particular evening?
Gordon: We weren't talking about music and dancing I was talking about firew~orks.
Morrow: I don't know if that is what all goes on with the fireworks.
Gordon: The Strikers bar there at the bowling alley is planning a parking lot party
around that period of time and they were going to shut down at 11:00. All of the parking
lot parties have been shutting down at 11:00. The fire works is what I was referring to
Meridian City Council • •
June 3, 1997
Page 34
and that has not been an issue as far as the music and dances they close down at
11:00.
Corrie: Does that answer your question Mr. Morrow?
Morrow. Yes, those were the only two things I had, we have a strategic planning
meeting coming up and an executive session so we can deal with those.
Corrie: (Inaudible)
Morrow: We had the executive session scheduled to do tv~ more departmen#s tonight
not to exceed'/ hour.
Bentley: I can't remember if the Chief inentioned this before I did, the tow~er is up and
running and we got rid of our dead spots. The radios are working good.
Rountree: I have an intero~ce memo here from Anna, a Linda Freize-Martin called to
confirm a presentation to the City Council at a w~rkshop on June 11, she is with ACHD
or Earthtek on the couple# study. Do you know anything about that, I know they want to
present one here, I know they want another meeting a couple of ineetings with the City
and they were talking about one mid-June and maybe one towards the end of June.
(Discussion Inaudible)
Rountree: I remember talking to Earthtech about them wanting to do it but I told them
they need to get a hold of the city to schedule dates or make suggested dates so that
we can get it on the calendar. I don't know if that person works for Earthtech or ACHD,
I don't know. I have no more
Corrie: There is a memorandum that Will had, ACHD meeting on Thursday on June 19"'
having it at noon rather than 4 p.m., 1 guess Susan Eastlake and Gary Richardson can
only be here et noon and Shari won't be here at all. Does anybody have any problems
with the noon time meeting.
Bentiey: t might have
Rountree: I don't have any problem with the noon time meeting Bob do we have
anything on the agenda that warrants a meeting?
Corrie: My next question to Will they were asking that we do it. We may have this one
that is on tonight on there. I don't recall anything Gary do you?
Berg: This is just a follow up that we said we would meet every even month on the third
Thursday unless they have some particular, I will check with her and see if they have
some particular items or issues if we don't.
Meridian City Council • ~
June 3, 1997
Page 35
Rountree: I don't think we do at this particular point so maybe we have a summer
reprieve.
Morrow: I guess the only question that me might have is what the status of Franklin
Road is and t make sure that thing is going to be under construction.
Berg: Could you send that in a letter?
Morrow: I don't know that it merits a meeting but I think we need to keep the pressure
on, on those kinds of projects for our town.
Berg: Well I think that has a major impact on traffic in our area.
Smith: Mr. Mayor, Council, I received a set of plans yesterday from ACHD there on that
project on Franklin Road for us to locate utilities on their 75% complete plans from Civil
Survey Consultants who is doing the redesign of it. It is my understanding they are to
have that redesign done September 1~ of this year so that it can go to contract shortly
after October. The letter that accompanied the plans from ACHD said that is was to be
constructed in 1998. I don't have any more information than that.
Morrow. (Inaudible)
Smith: Right, I think that I don't know what their project schedule v~rould be if it starts, the
possibility of it starting in October would probably be more along utility installations
during the winter and then hit the roadway curb gutter and sidewalk in the spring. But
they also have to get signals installed at Pine and East 1~ and Pine and Meridian ahead
of that project. That is scheduled to be done yet this summer as I understand.
Morrow: I guess we don't have anything that we are going to be discussing with them at
this particular (inaudible). What became of the issue that they were going to revisit their
bike lane policy, did they have that revisit?
Corrie: I haven't heard a vv~ord on it, have you.
Rountree: That meeting was the 28tn
Morrow. Of may, that meeting (inaudible).
Corrie: They were probably going to reiterate that they were going to have bike lanes
but I haven't heard.
Berg: Gary, I know that v~ had talked about Cherry Lane when that was constructed for
two miles having more street lights put in to a project like that. I v~uld be concerned
that whenever #hat would be done that we budget some money to light up that street a
Meridian City Councii ~ •
June 3, 1997
Page 36
major five lane road kind of gets dark even with just street lighted entrances of
subdivisions. We, I know we had talked about a road major like that constructed to
have street lights, but we need to know probably closer where that would be done so we
could budget accordingly if that would be the desire of the Council.
Morrow: (Inaudible)
Gordon: Mr. Mayor, Council and Councilman Morrow, I have always been an advocate
of more iights but as far as the benefit on a major arteriai on that I wouid have to do
some checking on it. It doesn't really affect houses it is just streets. Our problems are
not out on that major arterial they are in subdivisions. So without checking I wouldn't
really want to turn them down.
Morrow. Maybe that is something that you Will you and Gary and Bill can coordinate
and whatever you come up with make a recommendation to the Council and we press
on from there.
Corrie: Gary, I have a ques~ion, it was brought up to me on this Black Cat, ACHD is
going to put all new road through there, we put the sev~r line, we are going to have the
sewer line go south. Now we are not going to do the sewer line for awhile and they still
want to put the road in is that correct? Then they had a five year moratorium you can't
cut into it?
Smith: Mr. Mayor, they had Black Cat scheduled for an overlay from Franklin Road
north to Chinden. I believe they had it all done except for the length between Cherry
Lane and Ustick, they have dropped that length from their scheduled overlay projects
for this year. Primarily because of the work we are doing with the pressure main out of
Ashford Greens and also because that group out of Oregon or Washington wherever
they are from on that Quisner property the 40 acres, they had petitioned the highway
district because they want to be sure that they get their sewer and water installed and
Black Cat Road ahead of the pavement. So those two conditions the highway district, I
got a letter from them today in fact saying that they have dropped that one mile length of
road from overlay. It will be done next year.
Corrie: Okay, 1 will entertain a motion to go into Executive Session.
Bentley: So moved
Morrow: Second
Corrie: Motion made and seconded, all those in favor'? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
EXECUTIVE SESStON
Meridian City Council ~ •
June 3, 1997
Page 37
Corrie: We have come back from Executive Session, w~e were talking about
Department Personnel and no decisions v-~ere made and I will entertain a motion for
adjournment.
Morrow. So moved
Rountree: Second
Corrie: Motion made and secorrded vve adjourn, all those in favor'? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:15 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
APPROVED:
RA~€~T-B-fAI~ 1~,~1IIA~(4F~
Walt Morrow, City Council President
ATTEST:
,,`~~~~~~~~~{~~~f,~~,,,,.
.~ y ~ '''~,
~~ N~~j-t'`s
.
~~'~ "'
:
z
Q~~~. ~
~'o,~ "`~T ~s~ .
.,~~ln ~~ . `
~'~~~u-es, ~~~~~~~~
• ~
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
TUESDAY, JUNE 3, 1997 - 7:30 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD MAY 13, 1997: ~~o~~c-
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1997: ~rvve-
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1997: G~~~`.e1
1. TABLED MAY 6, 1997: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR ASHFORD GREENS SUBDIVISION BY
BRIGHTON CORPORATION: ~~ ~~~:~;e ~~Jv /~~
2. TABLED MAY 20, 1997: REQUEST FOR A REZONE OF APPROXIMATELY
9.42 ACRES FROM R-4 TO R-15 BY LORIN SAUNDERS:
~~Ce ~i~ ~i~,~.e ! 7 ? ~= ~ ~r ~ge-~ h.~~~cc.~'~
3. TABLED MAY 20, 1997: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF
APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE TO R-15 BY LARRY ~ KAY HANSEN:
~~ j~ c~~1L ,TI~ l7~ 1~
4. TABLED MAY 20, 1997: ORDINANC~#760 - COMMISSIONS, BOARDS
COMMITTEES. ~~~,~e ~~,,,~~ ~~~ ~~j ~i~,, ; '
5. TABLED MAY 2~, 1997: ORDINANCE #761 - TRAFFIC SAFETY
COMMISSION: ~~~~ ~~~ ~~,~L, `~~ ~~r
_~d
6. ORDINANCE #764 - PACKARD SUBDIVISION NO. 2 ANNEXATION:
~~pro v.,e-
7. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PACKARD SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BY
PNEIEDMONDS CONSTRUCTION; TABLED MAY 20, 1997:
~41~ ~,~t~Z CTu~-e l7~ ~
8. FINAL PLAT: SPORTSMAN POI~E SUBDIVISION NO. 7, 45 LOTS, SW
CORNER OF LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND, BY WESTPARK CO. INC.:
~'ra v-~
9. PUBLIC H RING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PE
OF A METAL BUILDH~NG 84' LONG BY 60' WIDE BY GENERAL COUNCIL
CHURCH OF GOD 7 DAY: ~vro~^~ ~"~~ ~C~L
~~n ~or~~ Qmer~cL ~o~cr,~
10. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUES FOR A VARIANCE TO 1400 SQUARE FOOT
HOUSE SIZE REQUIREMENT FOR 447 E. BALDWIN STREET, LOT 6, BLOCK
4 BEDFORD PLACE SUBDIVISION BY WINNIE ARD:
C':~j ~~f~,`` ~' ~g.~i~"r~,~ ~`/-~ ~% -
~ •
11. TIME EXTENSlON ON RECORDING F1NAL PLAT FOR PACKARD
SUBDIVISION NO. 1 PHASE 1: C~~yoV..~ p~ ~~ ,e~~~rb.s~
12. TIME EXTENSION ON SUBMITTING FINAL PLAT FOR PACKARD
SUBDIVISION NO. 1 PHASE 2: ~ro~'~ d~ r,~~ -
4-
13. LAMONT KOUBA: LOT SPLIT FOR 835 E. FAIRVIEW AVENUE:
G~j-v v~-
14. CHARLES & BRENDA MALLARD: LOT SPLIT 3235 S. LINDER ROAD - SW
CORNER OF VICTORY AND LINDER ROADS:
~~ro v~
15. PAULA DEVANEY: DOG LICENSING FOR GUIDE DOGS AND GUIDE DOG
PUPPIES: ~h ~~S=~u.ct' ~ c~ ~,~~-ih..c ~v anze:.~cC.
~ G~t~~~ t~.e y~'e ~~ ~ t~o s~ ~ l~~l~ ~C-Z~{~ p h~,'iha ~ c~
16. AGREEMENTS WITH JOINT SCHDOL DiSTRiCT NO. 2: ~~~ ~~~ ~
- USE OF LINDER, CHIEF JOSEPH, MERIDIAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:
- SUMMER RECREATION PROGRAM:
~~~ ~ v~ r~: c ;e~.~c~ ~ y ~c,~P ~,~.~i~h ~d wee~4r
17. WATER/SEWER/TRASH DELINQUENCIES: ~~v~-vv~.e._
18. APPROVE BILLS: ~z~~f-o~.~
19. DEPARTMENT REPORTS:
A. GARY SMITH, CiTY ENGlNEER:
1. B1D AWARD FOR EMERGENCY GENERATOR PROJECT:
2. FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY ADDENDUM - KELLER ASSOCIATES:
CITY OF MERIDIA
PUB~C MEETING SIGN-U 'HEET
NAME PHONE NUMBER
fe ~ . ~.'r ~o~~,~ ~S~/- 3~Z
~~ ~ S~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~~
CITY OF MERIDIA
PUB~ MEETING SIGN- HEET
_g gg --3~~~
., ,,
~~~ -~~z~
~y °'~-z~3?g
- /i.s' ~
-a~~s
NAME PHONE N MBER
~.- ,-r~ . ~ •-~-t s „ _ .n ,. _ ~,.. . _ _
• •
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: June 3.1997
APPLICANT: ITEM NUMBER; 17
REQUEST: WATER/3EWER/TRASH DELINQUENCIES
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DfRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FiRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DiSTRIGT:
COMMENTS
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: v~
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ~
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: (Q~
t~
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
All Materia{s presented at public meetings shail become property of the City of Meridian.
• ~
R~C~~fi~~D
J U N- 3 1g97
DELINQUENCY FOR C~TY OF ~ERII}~AN
TURN OFF SCHEDULED FOR ~i. f~ l97
MAYOR: This is to inform you in writing, if you choose to, you have the right to a
Pre-determination hearing at 7:30 P.M. Tuesday JLJNE 03, 1997 before the Mayor and the
City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and defend the claim made
by this City that your water, sewer and trash bill in delinquent. You may retain
council. This service will be discontinued on JUNE 11, 1997, unless payment
is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest their water, sewer and
trash delinquency? No response.
MAYOR: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the
City reviewed by Fourth sudicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho Code. Even
though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn off list
is $25,882.51
, ~
~ •
DELINQUENCY LIST
TURN OFF FOR 06/11/97
ACCOUNT# NAME & ADDRESS AMOUNT
1-20 THOMAS R HANIMON 96.32
719 MERIDIAN ST
1-1 ?0 RICHARD & KIMBERLY LOYA 68.68
721 W 3RD ST
1-720 DOUGLAS HADLEY 48.~6
647 W BROADWAY
1-750 RAYMOND HOPKINS 50.73
607 W BROADWAY AV ~
1-800 SID & SHELLY BREWER 58.16
423 W BROADWAY AV
1-920 JON C HOFFMAN 87.42
233 W BROADWAY AV
1-1040 JOE & HEATHER AZEVEDO 55.82
110 W RAILROAD AV
1-1360 GENEVA AKERS 213.13
812&810W4THST
1-1780 MELV1N L SCRIVER 53.36
728 W 8TH ST
1-2010 RICK S WISDOM 68.54
323 W IDAHO AV
1-2320 TERESA TEAFATILLER 76.23
1590 W BROADWAY CT ~
~ ~
1-2770 HAROLD ~ RIGENHAGEN 48.16
552 NW 15TH ST
1-2790 LEONARD P YANCEY 88.92
612 NW 15TH ST
1-3130 ALLEN FLENIING 45.76
935 W PINE AV
1-3670 SHELLIE FERRAND 60.88
403 MERIDIAN ST
1-4440 WILLIAM HOLSTEIN 92,96
870 W FRANKLIN RD
2-70 CYNTHIA THOMAS 60.88
922 W 2ND ST
2-180 RONDA LOWE 58.42
921 W 3RD ST
2-240 GERALD & MARILYN BLAZEK 61.02
1001 W 4TH ST
2-402 ANDREW & DA1vITA LUBACKY 62.25
912 NW 7TH AV
2-660 AUSTIN L YOUNG 64.37
908 W lOTH ST
2-860 DEAN ANDERSON 245.14
1200 W PINE AV
2-888 DEAN ANDERSON 48.24
1202 W PINE AV
2-958 TINA HENDRICKSON 78.80
997 NW 14TH ST
2-1190 A TERRELL 180.07
1324 W 1 ST ST
2-1200 B SMART 68.54
1332 W 1ST ST
~ •
2-1250 ELIZABETH WEAKLEY 61.99
1528 ~V 1 ST ST
2-1290 DANIEL & DIANE MORGAN 49.39
1624 W 1ST ST
2-1300 E.E. BRINEGAR 76.08
1632 W 1 ST ST
2-1510 MARI~ n~tANWARING 68.54
1305 W 1ST ST
2-1570 MICHAEL LOCK 94.00
1410W2NDST
2-1840 RICHARD J HAIRSTON 86.46
218 W MAPLE AV
2-1970 KERRY L LARSON 202.51
225 W MAPLE AV
2-2030 VIRGII~TIA MEYER 45.76
230 CAMELLIA AV
2-2100 CHRISTOPHER L SALMAN 48.15
231 CAMELLIA AV
2-2160 CLAY & NANCY O'DELL 63.48
224 W CHERRY LN
2-2280 RICHARD SCHERER 127.02
201 CHERRY AV
2-2490 DEENA L PATTERSON 56.25
330 CHERRY AV
2-3340 RICHARD POE 64.59
1115 W 6TH ST
2-4630 BRUCE G HARVEY 123.42
1239 MAPLE ST
2-4740 JUDY ALBRECHT 72.3 7
1406 W 14TH ST
~ ~
2-4800 JUDY L TODD 63.10
1400 NORTHGATE AV
2-5020 KENNETH WOOD 73.74
1538 N LINDER RD
2-5030 MARTHA JONES 50.62
153 S NORTHGATE AV
2-5040 BARRY D MITCHELL 124.76
152? NORTHGATE AV
2-5170 JII.L RODRIGLTEZ 181.47
1401 W 14TH ST
2-5450 MIICE VARGASON 50.76
1526 ELM PLACE
2-5710 RICHARD G WESTCOTT 48.16
1421 W CARLTON ST
2-5850 PHII,LIP DUPEROUZEL 75.34
1406 W CARLTON ST
2-5960 E GAINES & R SCHULER I40.83
1104 WASHINGTON PL
2-6030 TOM KRASOWSKI 60.88
1017 W 12TH AV
2-6100 MARAIE R JACOBS 48.16
1114 W 12TH AV
2-6170 SHANE SMITH 50.76
1119W 11THST
2-6300 PATRICIA ANSON 151.59
1203 W 8TH ST
3-4 JAN WILSON 51.99
2016 W SLATON DR
3-10 JOHN JOHNSON 91.39
770 N ABERNATHY WY
~
3-28 CHRISTOPHER STIEF
2132 W JAYTON DR
3-100 TINA WEATHERMON
631 N TIDWELL WY
3 -102 KENT & JENIVIFER MII,LER
617 N TIDWELL WY
3-298 DAVID R KING
213 7 W SNYDER DR
3-308 MICHAEL BITTNER
2065 W SNYDER DR
3-332 DAVID PORTER
1979 W SLATON DR
3-362 GREG & NANCY HONO
1903 W SNYDER DR
3-388 LESLIE BRLTNTON
1968 W SLATON DR
3-400 JAMES & LESLIE ALLEN
795 N TALL PINE PL
3-690 CITY RADIATOR & MUFFLER
671 N LINDER RD
4-1412 RODNEY & M NAOMI
2826 W LEONARD CT
4-1424 SHIRLEY BUTLER
2774 W SHERYL ST
4-1436 DONALD & PAULINE COTRAIN
2946 W SHERYL ST
4-1562 GARRETT LONGSTREET
2713 W SANTA CLARA DR
4-1632 JOHN & JANA SIMMONS
2894 W WII.LARD ST
•
71.14
64.57
49.39
42.27
108.35
62.25
67.31
55.82
40.04
243.98
66.08
64.71
82.63
104.11
57.05
~ ~
4-1646 BRETT & ANGIE PIKE 42.05
2835 W SHERYL ST
4-1930 MIKE RIGGS 101.39
1421 N VINEYARD AV
4-2084 RONALD DOUTHIT 63.48
2298 W SANTA CLARA DR
4-2144 DARYL HOLDEN 54.31
1340 N VINEYARD AV
4-2168 LON ST. CLAIR 48.16
1849 W SANTA CLARA DR
4-2308 CHARLES & TONI BUTTERFIELD 239.66
1475 N SANTA ROSA PL
4-2324 SUSAN & MICHAEL LEE 63.48
1532 N VINEYARD AV
5-172 KATHLEEN LANGER 62.40
3992 W THORN CREEK CT
5-678 MARK A BURT 56.77
1341 N OAK CREEK WY
5-708 DON DWYER 41.32
1488 N LAUDERHII,L WY
5-712 KEITH STRONG 205.27
3505 W FIR CREEK CT
5-792 DON WICK 151.96
3732 W PINE CREEK CT
20-1492 DEI~TNIS TRAMPLEASURE 61.02
3565 W TUPELO CT
20-1544 RISH HOMES 62.25
3455 W WOODMONT DR
20-1610 PHYLLIS AITKEN 60.74
3950 SUGAR CREEK DR
~ •
20-1682 ROBERT STOTTS 61.79
3659 WOODMONT DR
20-1758 STEPHEN & LINDA LYONS 93.83
. 3602 W STANWICH DR
20-1830 RODNEY BRADY 95.35
3840 SEA ISLAND CT
20-1846 MICKEY L WARE 76.34
3721 SEA ISLAND CT
20-1890 RONALD LIJKESH 62.25
19? 1 INTERLACHEN WY
20-1965 TECO INVESTMENTS 48.16
3931 SUGAR CREEK DR
20-2006 DITKE ARNETT 48.16
3720 QUAKER RIDGE DR
21-4 WALKER FAMILY TRUST 168.69
1632 TODD WAY
21-80 DARIN LOWE 66.89
2402 N LEANN WY
21-204 DANA DUMOND 49.39
2660 W CREEKSTONE CT
21-568 REESE & JANA BARKER 71.14
2633 W PEBBLESTONE CT
21-1590 DAVID WHITTEN 76. 77
2151 TODD WY
21-1652 MARII,YN MYERS 355.21
2085 KRISTEN WY
21-1766 RICK K COFFMAN 79. 89
1960 MARIANNA PL
21-1920 SHANNON RODERICK 77.69
2512 REBECCA WY
~
21-1928 BRUCE R BAILEY
2590 REBECCA WY
21-2006 MARK & TAMARA ROSE CC
1732 N MORELLO AV
21-2056 JEFF SALVATORE
1735 N VICTOR AV
21-2194 PATRICK WILDS
3073 W KANDICE ST
21-2198 JENNIFER LOVAN
3035 W KANDICE ST
21-2236 STEVIN & HEIDI BROOKS
2962 W KANDICE ST
21-2918 DAVID & KAREN REYES
2953 W ELK STREAM ST
21-3036 GERALDINE BARR
2991 W RAVENHIIRST ST
21-3068 PATRICK & JUDY BOYDSTUN
2943 W JOUST ST
21-3142 DOUGLAS JAY LO VELAND
3092 W SWEETBRIAR ST
22-178 ADALFO VALDEZ
2000 W EMERALD FALLS CT
22-204 WII.,LIAM & PAMELA BENNETT
1963 W SILVER FALLS CT
22-224 JOHN BERGERSON
1718 N KASTLE FALLS AV
22-322 CLIFFORD WELLS
1830 W CHATEAU DR
22-330 ELDON & LORI JONES
2312 MONACO WAY
~
67.19
96.52
68.54
50.91
80.29
58.79
57.05
82.49
53.22
64.71
61.02
68.40
88.92
77.04
92.75
~ ~
22-336 CARI LARSON 66.08
1891 TRACY CT
22-808 DAN EKENBERG 48.16
2283 N ATAIRE WY
22-810 JOHN L BRUNELLO 60.88
2257 N ASTAIRE WY
22-868 RONALD POLLARD 125.85
2307 N KUBIK PL
22-880 KEVIN F REITH 148.90
2183 N GLENNFIELD WY
22-914 JEAN RUCKER 100.27
2261 MONACO WY
22-1008 GARNETT BLEDSOE 98.10
2065 N ASTAIRE WY
22-1350 GAYLEN & SHANNON COWGER 184.67
1956 W MCGLINCHEY ST
22-1380 GEORGE & PATRICIA STORER 101.78
2008 MONACO WY
22-1386 MICHAEL SCHAEFFER 86.60
1933 W SANDALWOOD DR
22-1396 WII,LIAM AVERY 106.70
1967 CAIltNS WY'
22-1466 MARCUS SHELDON CC 77.31
1710 W HENDRICKS ST
22-1482 LYLE D ANDERSON 89.06
1723 SANDALWOOD DR
22-1518 JAMES WOOSLEY 65.69
1942 SANDALWOOD DR
22-1524 CARL L KOCH 55.82
1994 SANDALWOOD DR
• ~
22-1546 BECKY PETERSEN GCC 65.47
2184 MONACO WY
22-1614 DONALD H FISHER 59.65
1750 BEARDON CT
31-124 JON POWELL 71.96
1670 NW 13TH AV
31-174 CYNTHIA L SCHERTELL 47.24
1906 NW 12TH AV
31-176 JOHN OBERBUBOR GCC 246.39
1912 NW 12TH ST
31-234 JIM F GABRIELSON 53.22
1625 NW 13TH AV
31-492 J&M L.L.C 309.54
1401 SANDALWOOOD DR
31-502 MARY ANN OLSEN 102.24
1472 STOREY AV
31-514 LORETTA A JENSEN 52.04
1522 STOREY AV
31-516 SHARON JARRETT 132.42
1542 STOREY AV
31-538 ROBERT L MII,LER 60.88
1521 KINGSWOOD AV
31-548 ROBERT SPARKS 58.28
1509 KINGSWOOD AV
31-608 MIKE WALKER GCC 172.79
1333 NEWPORT DR
31-720 MARY F BURKE 64.71
1236 NEWPORT DR
31-726 JASON & LAURIE NITZ 65.94
1324 NEWPORT DR
~ ~
31-732 WII,LIAM & SANDY PENDELTON 102.49
2132 NEWPORT DR
31-880 DENNIS IVICK CC 101.24
1512 W CHATEAU AV
31-1062 ROBERT & CAROLYN RIDGEWAY 80,17
1223 DARRAH DR
31-1264 BRENT & JEAN MORGAN 50.76
1232 DARRAH DR
31-223 8 RENEE TUBB S 63 .36
I310 DARRAH DR
31-2300 DOUGLAS S. HALLOCK 77.43
1532 LUWERY ST
31-3016 HARRY DAVIS 83.63
2217 NW 14TH ST
31-3018 FORREST F SCHLJSTER 91.56
2218 NW 14TH ST
31-3034 MARII,YN EDW~4RDS 69.80
1311 W CHATEAU AV
31-3042 ALAN & JENNY BEAN 65.66
1089 W CHATEAU DR
31-3242 DAVID E. MCGOWAN 97.67
2211 NW 11 TH ST
31-3382 MONTE LEVITT 55.82
2231 NW IOTH ST
31-3422 TIM ALLEN 79.03
1034 FAIRWOOD CT
31-3458 DARRYL HOPKINS 66.29
2048 NW 9TH PL
31-3474 SHAWN MCDONALD 63.48
2082 NW lOTH PL
~
31-3 516 JASON MCARTHUR
1814 NW 11 TH AV
32-416 SANDY STURGIS
1706 W 7TH
32-566 BARBARA J HICKS CC
1919 CRESTMONT DR
32-616 CONNIE JO JOHNSON
I910 CRESTMONT DR
32-630 VINCENT GARDNER
2070 CRESTMONT DR
32-650 GAVIN TAYLOR
501 LONGFORD DR
32-656 H. LARUE BEVINGTON
467 CRAMNER DR
32-672 DOUGLAS & KATHLEEN MCVEY
3 31 CRAMNER DR
32-884 DEBORAH J CARLSON
566 TIFFANY DR
32-910 FRANK & CATHERINE CANNELL
2395 N KELSEY PL
32-1368 THOMAS GRATTON
382 W WATERBURY DR
32-1612 GENA MEHLLJM
2611 N RIDGEBURY WY
32-1648 ROBERT & JENNIFER GREEN
451 W WATERBURY DR
33-56 TEL-CAR
220 E FAIRVIEW AV
33-358 JAMES COURT APARTMENTS
2110 N MERIDIAN RD
!
65.94
216.85
120.53
141.54
119.17
72.09
106.84
83.86
54.59
60.46
84.97
48.16
68.54
774.88
192.64
~
33-362 JAMES COURT APARTMENTS
2150 N MERIDIAN RD
33-366 JAMES COURT APARTMENTS
150 JAMES COURT LN
33-370 JAMES COURT APARTMENTS
152 JAMES COURT LN
33-374 JAMES COURT APARTMENTS
142 JAMES COURT LN
33-380 JAMES COURT APARTMENTS
192 JAMES COURT LN
33-382 JAMES COURT APARTMENTS
180 JAMES COURT LN
33-386 JAMES COURT APARTMENTS
162 JAMES COURT LN
33-388 JAMES COURT APARTMENTS
172 JAMES COURT LN
33-390 JAMES COURT APARTMENTS
216 JAMES COURT LN
33-394 JAMES COURT APARTMENTS
206 JAMES COURT LN
33-400 JAMES COURT APARTMENTS
230 JAMES COURT LN
33-408 JAMES COURT APARTMENTS
110 JAMES COURT LN
33-1850 GARY & BOBETTE MARSHALL
2472 N LARCHMONT PL
33-2344 RONALD & DENA PETERSEN
640 E WOODBURY DR
33-2550 JOHN ST AMAND
2564 N CAPECOD WY
•
227.25
236.80
192.64
192.64
192.64
140.82
192.64
96.32
105.11
192.64
192.64
385.28
81.32
63.48
50.76
~
33-7602 RICHARD GALLION
113 E EASTBROOK CT
34-342 RONALD & THERESA DARCO
1686 JERICHO RD
34-496 TIMOTHY LOVE
2089 N SAPPHIRE PL
34-500 LAYNE MOURITSEN
2092 N SAPPHIRE PL
34-828 EWING CO INC
983 E BLUE HERON ST
34-886 ALLEN & KELLEY DUREN
1021 E GROUSE DR
34-1286 PHIL & DEBORAH HALCOMB
2581 N BLACK BEAR WY
34-1472 DWIGHT COOMBS
2898 N MULE DEER WY
34-1560 HAROLD PHII.P
952 E HAWK ST
34-1698 DAVID & CINDY RABEHL
2499 N LARK AV
34-1754 DAVID LIEBERMAN
2307 N LARK AV
34-1764 RICHARD CLJNNINGHAM
845 E CHATEAU DR
34-1816 KURTIS HIGBEE
974 CLAYBOURNE DR
34-1902 KEITH D HUSAKER
2061 N LARK PL
34-1948 FORREST MOORE
821 E WII.LOWBROOK DR
~
33.76
119.00
49.53
62.17
48.16
192.05
83.58
51.30
77.01
81.34
63.48
98.20
60.88
64.57
237.76
• ~
34-1976 MARJO LACROIX 53.36
1028 CLARENE ST
34-2044 WII.LIAM G MILLER 91.52
1855 TEARE AV
34-2104 HEIDI TYI,ER 126.12
1034 TAMMY ST
34-2122 GLEN SCHMIDT 67.03
1920 TEARE AV
34-2144 THOMAS A SCHRANK 110.53
1841 JERICHO RD
34-2728 RON THURBER 97.55
1210 E COUGAR CREEK DR
34-2802 BRETT & MICHELLE DUNSTAN 72.23
1316 E RINGNECK CT
34-2820 LANCE & KELLY ROSS 55.09
1281 E RINGNECK CT
34-32Q6 DIANA GRAYSON 52.77
1285 E STORMY DR
42-452 THOMAS JORGENSEN 112.96
2409 E GRAPEWOOD DR
42-456 BARBARA CIRELLI 107.79
2443 E GRAPEWOOD DR
42-466 AARON & JANALEE DITTMAN 57.05
2543 E GRAPEWOOD DR
42-468 KYLE HII.,L 63.48
2561 E GRAPEWOOD DR
42-1074 MA.RK THOMANN 65.82
1715 E OAKCREST DR
42-1978 DAVID & SHELLEY MORSE 66.08
1810 E MEADOW W04D ST
• ~
42-2024 ROBERT V STEEN 53.48
2149 E CHTEAU DR
42-2072 TODD & LEISA MCCLINTICK 112.04
2047 N WINGATE PL
42-2096 DOUGLAS KALTENECKER 69.63
224 N WINGATE PL
42-2252 BRAD L MCKINLEY 96.58
2220 E CHATEAU DR
42-2370 WILLIAM AII~IVIAN 48.16
1704 E GREENII~ADOW CT
42-2404 PHOEBE ROSE 50.76
2277 N LOCHNESS WY
42-2496 LESLIE SIEMON 108.21
1961 E GLENLOCH ST
42-2578 SHELLIE HOFFMAN C/CC 91.77
2518 N MEADOWGLEN PL
42-2582 LORRI CHAPMAN 72.25
2542 N MEADOWGLEN PL
42-2716 CRAIG COMBS 65.94
2529 N LAUGHRIDGE AV
42-2730 RANDALL REPACI 102.87
1866 E GLENLOCH ST
42-3050 LESLIE SCHOLZ 42.55
1874 E CHALLIS DR
46-212 CRAIG FINLAYSON 83.46
3826 E PRESIDENTIAL DR
46-468 KEVIN & TINA BORCHARDT 65.94
1071 N FILLMORE WY
50-2 TOM & RHONDA ELLIOTT 54.45
16EPINEAV
• !
50-88 JAYNESUE DOWDY 51.44
934 E STH ST
50-256 ELLEN ROBBINS 89.46
32 E STATE AV
50-726 C.F.I. INVESTMENTS 74.23
364 E WASHINGTON AV
50-1198 WILLIAM GARDOSKI 61.97
1620 E 2 1/2 ST
50-1254 R4BERT & CAROLL SPENCER 80.92
1323 E 2 1/2 ST
50-1686 MARVIN TAVARES 49.39
38-38 1/2 WASHINGTON AV
50-1910 GROVER BROWN 75.52
1578 N PENRITH PL
50-2106 RICHARD & PRISCILLA ROBINSON CC 71.20
1278 N STONEHENGE WY
50-2150 RYAN & JII.L NELSON 51.13
966 E WINSLOW ST
50-2198 DOUG MASON 67.03
864 E ASHFORD ST
50-2302 KENNETH TODD 114.98
1159 E SHELLBROOK DR
50-2440 BROCK DEBOARD 66.61
1446 N PENRITH AV
50-2444 STEVE & TRACY MC1vITT 54.45
1472 N PENRITH AV
50-3692 VINCENT KOUBA 51.99
1536 E BUCHMAN
50-3724 STEVE MEISTRELL 69.04
995 N RALSTIN PL
~
50-3726 1VICKIE MEATTE
989 N RALSTIN PL
50-3742 KEVIN BAILEY
946 N SCRIVNER WY
SO-4478 MICHAEL R COLEMAN
532 E PINE AV
50-4486 DAVID W KETTLES
520 E PINE AV
S 1-334 MATTHEW & 3ULIE BROWN
304 E BROADWAY AV
51-354 AUDIO ELECTROIVICS
722 E 2ND ST
51-450 MURRI'S ELECTRONICS
131 E IDAHO AV
51-470 ROBERT HORTON
237 E IDAHO AV
51-482 RICHARD l~~iURRAY
319 E IDAHO AV
51-506 LOUISE BROOKSHIlZE
731 E STH ST
51-534 MARGARETTE HORTON
607 E IDAHO AV
51-714 JOHN M HUMPHEYS
408 E IDAHO AV
51-786 SON SHINE INC
114 E IDAH~ AV
51-938 EUGENE STRATE
707 E PINE AV
51-998 CHARLOTTE LOW
911 E PINE AV
~
57.19
68.94
154.65
84.54
143.49
62.56
154.48
59.51
69.91
115.99
81.92
72.37
145.84
29.82
35.97
• •
51-3198 STEVEN RYKER 64.71
216E3RDST
51-330Q DAVID ROBERTS 44.45
133 E KING ST
51-3820 3EFFREY L CHANCE 95.21
342 E 3RD ST
51-393Q RICHARD MII,LER 63.36
402 E 2ND ST
52-1066 CUTLERY SHOPPE 208.04
390 E CORPORATE DR
52-1082 DEPT. OF LABOR 109.86
205 E WATERTOWER LN
68-20 DAREN & JAMIE RIVADENEYRA 72.37
2419 S RLJBY RAPIDS PL
68-46 JASON & LIANNA JACOBSEN 58.28
1260 E TIME ZONE DR
69-138 JAMES & PEGGY SUE BANG 49.39
1487 E BLIJE TICK ST
69-524 PAT & BEKKI ELORDI 114.10
1082 E PEACOCK ST
69-590 MONTGOMERY BAPTISTE 70.86
1384 E BORZOI ST
69-770 LARRY & JULIA WAYMENT 65.94
1698 S BLACKSMITH PL
69-802 JOHN & SHARON JULIAN 95.38
1880 S BLACKSMITH PL
69-1076 DAVID & LAURIE RUPERT 93.58
923 E STE MARTIN DR
69-1574 ROSS & DEBBIE MASON 98.76
6] 8 E LINKERSHIM DR
~ ~
69-1616 ANTO1vI0 ALONSO 131.86
1928 SE STH WY
72-120 R~AN WILHITE 53.36
2010 S GULL COVE PL
72-212 JUSTIN GREEN 70.88
2093 S RIPTIDE PL
74-60 VALERIE ALVES 91.52
343 SW 7TH AV
74-94 RANDY WINWOOD 56.45
671 PENNWOOD ST
74-324 VALERIE COPELAND 147.48
b94 PENNWOOD ST
74-350 GARY E FRANK 72.37
638 HANOVER CT
?4-354 MICHAEL & STACY SAUNDERS 41.87
678 HANOVER CT
74-356 JOE WII,SON 73.74
692 HANOVER CT
74-386 AARON HAWLEY 79.12
67b FULMER CT
74-422 DENA CROASDALE 65.94
633 BARRETT ST
74-676 KENNETH L JAR.R.ELL 58.42
692 W BA.RRETT ST
74-2520 DAVID TOLAND 54.04
1395 W K;IMRA ST
74-25b8 LARYY & CHERYL ELD 50.76
975 W PENNWOOD ST
74-2744 KEVIN & SHAWNA ABBOTT 64.71
1284 W CRESTWOOD DR
~
74-2834 BILLY CROWLEY
1289 W CRESTWOOD DR
74-3000 RICHARD PHILLIPS
613 S CANVASBACK WY
?4-3022 RICHARD & GAYLE GRAY
1063 W LOON ST
74-3118 ROBERT HERNANDEZ
711 S MUSCOVY AV
74-3122 STEVEN WESTERBERG
668 S M[JSCOVY AV
74-3170 REX & DONNA SINIl~~S
1141 W GREENHEAD ST
74-3210 LONNIE ROBINSON
866 W GREENHEAD ST
74-3252 COREY KOEPPLIN
547 S PELICAN WY
74-3296 ROB & CARMEN BIENAPFL
404 S CANVASBACK WY
74-3336 KENNETH ILG
1525 W GANDER DR
74-3356 STEPHEN PAYNE
1311 W CANDER DR
74-3956 , DAVID WOBIG
1401 W WALTMAN DR
~
99.12
79.61
92.75
50.00
60.60
98.21
55.82
61.83
48.16
86.72
48.16
78.52
~
TOTAL SHUTOFFS ~`=-`~'-~-~y~= ' ~
~
~
AMOUT $--= = ~ -------------
`J
~
10l00l95 235 $26,917.96 64 $6,695.95
11 /15l95 181 $21,Q43.78 35 $4,271.74
12/13/95 267 $25,869.42 54 $12,519.57
2/17196 246 $18,874.87 68 $5,347.35
3/13/96 258 $19,934.89 38 $3,154.20
4/10/96 282 $21,055.55 58 $4,701.91
5/15/96 196 $16,980.06 38 $2,713.32
6/12/96 263 $19,527.28 45 $3,291.76
7/10/96 217 $16,444.58 64 $5,610.89
8/7196 137 $13,860.07 98 $9,750.27
9/4/96 142 $16,315.14 96 $10,800.74
10/1196 173 $20,416.27 138 $16,339.93
11/6/96 225 $26,517.1fi 65 $7,815.25
12/3/96 364 $40,442.27 87 $9,014.40
1R/97 254 $14,513.21 114 $10,118.82
2/4/97 309 $27,739.74 87 $7,711.27
3J4197 377 $34,112.56 74 $6,727.97
4/1/97 424 $37,234.43 93 $8,140.86
5/6/97 281 $21,753.58 88 $7,585.18
6i3i97 308 $28,882.56
~ ~
MERtD1AN CiTY COUNCIL MEETING: June S 1887
APPLICANT: ITEM NUMBER; 19
REQUEST: DEPARTMENT REPORTS
AGENCY COMMENTS
CtTY CLERK:
ClTY ENGINEER:
CiTY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CiTY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDtAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HfGHWAY DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY STREE7 NAME C~Mtdlll'TEE:
CENTRAL DtSTRiCT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS 1RRIGATIfJN:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATiOfd:
OTHER:
All Materiats pr~sented at public meetings sha{I become property of the City of Meridian.
~
Custom Electric,Jnc,
28L10 West idaho Bivd.
Emmett, idaho 83697
208-355-2700
Fax 2Q8-365-2788
Civil Survey Consuftants, inc:
888-4312
~
Job Quote
- --- -- _.. .-. ; ~;, ~ r-.
_. ~_i ~'ti,/ f,__ ~_~-.`
___. __.. __ ; i ~ .
~~; :
~ ~ :i ~;
!
;,
Attn: Brad Watson ____..___J.____.__....,_._.____^~.,,
ro: Clty o~ Meridian
Emergency Generatar System
887-2211
Fax 887-1297
Dare: May 2s, 9997
~ WWrP and WeN # 14 2T5XW Generetors
~~~9~~.~~~~~~' ; '. ~ ' ' ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~'~~~~~~~~ : ~~~~1~~~~~~~~~ ~~E~~'1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~1:~ ~~i~~~~~~i
~
O f~D ~
J~ Q~ C~
O N ~
1~~• C~O ~
~ 6R}
~
~
~
~
~a
~ ~
V
~
m '~
a
_
E ~
~ ~
~
-a
m
w
~ ~
~ E
~ ~ E- ~
~ ~
~
~ ,m
W
c°i
O
~ o a
W
Z V ~
W
('
~
c
U =
Z
~ c
~
W . ry
o
~- V
W
v
~
z° '
~
~ '',
~
~
a
~
~n
~
~ °0 0
~ ~ ~
Q C p
~ ~
E
~~ r
~m m
t0 0
O> ~ O
tL1 a O
~~a~
~
~ O N
N ~ ~
O~ ~
N
tif
~~~
S ~ ~, ~O
~~ rN" Q OO
h
O O ~
,~
M ~~! O
O M CO ~
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~r~.
:°ER
~
~
~~~~ ,
~
M
;~~:~ ~
..~~~
v`Ai, ~~ °o,
m ~M
~ o
~~
a a
~ ~
~
~ ~
~
J
ao
u~
T
~
c
~
~
c
~J
c c
o '~
~ _
0 ?fl
c~
c m
~
a°
~ .g 4
maa°
~ ~ ~.
Oo~
~..~~
w~~
LL
G
~
~
~
~
m
+ }~
'
` ~~ ,: LLER •
` SSOCIA.TES, INC.
FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY
OUTLINE OF SCOPE 4F `
1.1 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
a) Schedule and Budgets
h) City Reviews
c) Agency Coordination
1.2 GEOGR.APHIC FEATURES
• ,
F~~ ~~
~rr~
;NDUM b~ 3 1 ~~ ~
~
'' CGn~v~c.~' t~w.w,,~ "
a) Base Mapping Transfer - All FPS and planning maps provided by city
b) Base Mapping - Extend to include new Meridian Land Use Map and Infrastructure
Planning Area
c) Surface and Groundwater - Completed in FPS, therefore data transfer only
d) Soils - Completed in FPS, therefore data transfer only
1.3 DEMOGRAPHICS INFORMA-TION
a) Population Projections - Verify with APA and City planners
b) Land Use - Completed in Comprehensive Plan
1.4 WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATION rl !~' , + ^ : : Y ', ~ '~ ~ ^ ~ ~ - ~~~`~ '~ ~ ., „ , - .
l r' ~'" • 1 'f ` ~:~,•..~ =~~ >>~ . • .
r
_ ~ ~
a) UI Verification - Completed in FPS, therefore verification and presentation only -~
b) Wastewater Parameters - Completed in previous report
c) Future Flaw and Loading Projections - Completed in previous report
1.S COLLECTI4N SYSTEM
a) Hydra System Modeling - to be completed by the City `''
b) Master Plan - The modeling campleted by the City will be utilized to develop a
tentative collection systems master plan. Consultant will prepare mapping and
cost estimates for the master plan working with City representatives.
~•' R" ~°c) Existing Pipe Condition - City will provided pipe condition data and consultant
~;~~~~
~~r~~..~~,~ "- will prepare mapping and priority for upgrading, replacement and cast estimates.
.- ~ -
C:\work\ 1950241scope 04f 18/97
y ~ .
1.6 WASTEWATER TREATMENT
a) Existing Plant Capacity - Document based on present plant and existing
construction completed. Data is available from Keller Associates Bio-selector
study.
b) Treatment Plant Options
l. Bio-selectors - Completed in Keller Associates Study
2. Oxidation Ditch - Preliminary data for a parallel oxidation ditch plant
including O&M costs.
3. Sequencing Batch Reactors = Preliminary data for a parallel sequencing
batch reactor plant including O&M costs.
c) Disinfection Presentation - Completed in previous Keller Associates Study.
Present data in report.
d) DisposalOptions
1. 5 Mile Creek/River r?o~:C iL',ti~~ ;•,~~;~~~ `;->>r~~
r,
2. Reuse Possibilities - Preliminary review of possible irrigation usages (
I
, . ;
3. Rapid Infiltration - Preliminary review of disposal of tertiary treated water ~
by rapid infiltration.;' Ji;,,; i` ~t'~-- i,-~.~rti~ 7y;, ,>~: r,:~.,. ,, ,,L '.r,,, t. G'-;~~'- ~rty ...~
1.7 APPARENT BEST ALTERNATIVE
a) Long Term Treatment Facilities - This data is available from the previous Keller
Associates Study. Phasing with associated costs will be presented in the report.
b) Callection System Plan - This data will be available from the City. Phasing with
associated costs will be presented in the report.
1.8 REPORT PREPARATION
a} Draft Report - Consultant will prepare a draft Addendum Report to the 1993
Facilities Planning Study.
b) Final Report - After comments are received from The Public Hearing, the City,
and Agencies a final report will be prepared and 10 copies provided to the City.
C:lwork1195024\scope 04/18197
~ ~
1.9 PUBLIC HEARING PR4CESS
a) New Releases and Hearing Advertisements - Consultant will assist the City in
preparing necessary advertisement for the Hearing.
b) Public Hearing - Consultant will prepare public exhibits and hearing presentation
data, and shall help the City conduct an open ~house .hearing for the Facilities
Planning StudY• ~,~ ; ~ 7- 6: ;1 ~;',-;ti . J ~
c) Hearing Transcript - The consultant will prepare a hearing transcript which will
address all questions that are posed in the Public Hearing.
C:\work119S0241scope Qq/ ~ 8J97
~ ~
~ Meridian, Idaho
Facilities Plaaning Studp Revision
Man Days
~~1S ~ 1~ t~s~ i~raCtwr~ .rzu ;-
~ LLt~~ s o w~. d n.~"a ;~-~ =t~
~' r+Q~~'~" ~~"
r S.cop~
?O Y ~4VL ~'~ T'~ ~N
Task Principal
588.00 Sr. Eogineer
S8a00 Eogincer
555.00 Drafter
533.00 Field
538.00 rical
S25.OU
Total
1.1 Pro'ect Administcation
a) Schedule and Bu ets i 1 S9p4,pp
b) Cit Reviews I i a9pq,pp
c) A enc Coordination 2 2 S~,gpg_pp
1.2 ra hic ~eatnres
a) Base Ma in Transfer 0.5 2 $748,pp
b) Base M in Modificadons 0:5 4
S 1,276.00
(New Tm act A[ea)
c) Surface and Groundwater Feacures 0.5 5220.00
(Da[a Transfer & Verficiation)
d) Soils Data Transfer & Verification 0.5 5220.00
1.3 Dem rs hic Information
a) Po utadon Pro' don Verification 0.5 2 $1,200.00
b) Land Use ~ata Transfer 0.5 I.5 5616.00
L4 Wastewater Charactentzation
a) Ut Verificarion Q.5 2 $1,200.00
b) Wastewater Parameters 0.5 5320.00
c) Future Flow and Loadin 0.5 5320.00
is cou~oa s c~
a) HYDRA S stem Modelin 0.5 5352.00
b) Master Plani h~'~,! { p. ~ d S ~/ R R~{ {~ 0.5 3 5 52.992.00
c)Exisdn Pi Condition nQ' ~~lGt '~ 2 3 S1,672.00
(Data frnm Ci[ )
1.6 Wastewater Treadnent
a) Exisan P{ant C i ~ s(~qp,pp
b) Treatment Ptant tions
I) Bio-Selectot ~ ' ~ Sgqp_pp
2) Oxidadon Ditch , k:j "'' 0.5 3 1 52,536.00 "
3)SSR / d 3 1 $2,184.00 ~
c) Disinfection Presentation 0.5 $320.00
d) Dis O tions '
1) 5-Mile C~eek/River ! 1 1 $~,Sqq,pp
2) Re-use Possibiiities 0.5 2 I 51,832.00
3? Ra id lnfiltration I 2 51,484.00
1.7 A rent Best Alternatives
a) Lon -term Treatment 0.5 2 1 SI,g96.00
c) Collection S s[em 1 - 2 s~,g?2,pp
1.8 R rt Pce ration
a) Draft Re n I 2 4 4 5 $5.800.00
b) Final Re rt 1 I 1 St,iQ4.00
1.9 Public Partict tion
a) News Releases and Hearian Advertisements I 2 $l, (04,0p
b) Public Hearin 2 2 2 4 1 $4,g2A.00
c)Hearin Transcri andAnswerQuestions 0.5 0.5 2 $1,072.00
(Use O n House Formut)
SUB-TflTAL 14 24 17S Z9S 0 18 S4d.304.00
20 Eovironmental Information Document f ~!'/
u) Transfer E!D ~ ~ $200.qp
b) Verif EID ,, ,~'' •. ` 1 $64p.Qp
c) Modif for Selected O rion ~ 0.5 2 3 3 $3,02A.00
SUS-TOTAL OS 3 0 3 0 4 53,864.00
TOTALS 14S 27.0 17S 32S 0.0 22.0 S4&168.00
r.~.;
,
a
~~ ~
'J~^
~
~
~
,~4c
T
~
~
w-
1--
~.,
-+-
~
~
~
N
.~
~
!
~ ,
a/IRn)1 Page t of 2 c:lwqk1t9502a~FPS-rev.
.
• ~ ~r~~'.~
.~
~/~/~~
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
SEWER FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY ADDENDUM
BETWEEN
CITY OF MERIDIAN and KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.
KA NO. 196439
This Agreement is made and entered into between the City of Meridian (herein called OWNER) and
Keller Associates, Inc. (herein called CONSULTANI') this 3rd day of June, 1997.
In consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the OWNER and the CONSULTANT agree as
foliows:
1.
~
3.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
During the terms of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall furnish to the OWNER a Sewer
Facilities Planning Study Addendum specifically set forth in the Attachment A, attached hereto
and made a part hereof. Such services shatl be performed by individuals as employees of
CONSULTANT, an independent Contractor~ and. not as employees of the OWNER.
PERIOD OF A~REEMENT
The Agreement shall commence on the first above written date and terminate on April 1, 1998.
PAYMENT RATES AND BILLING
3.1 As compensation for services to be performed by CONSULTANT, the OWNER will pay
CONSULTANT the amount set forth in the Attachment B attached hereto. OWNER
shall not have any liability for any other expense or costs incurred by CONSULTANT,
uniess otherwise provided in the Schedule or authorized by the UWNER.
3.2 CONSULTANT shall keep accurate records of the time expended. Payment for setvices
performed by CONSULTANT shali be made by the end of each month upon the
submission by CONStJLTANT of invoices or time statements to the OWNER.
Invoices submitted by the CONSULTANT will:
A. Accurately describe services rendered during the invoice period, including
respective dates of performance and any reports submitted.
B. Identify any other authorized expense incurred hereunder; and
C. Make reference to this A,greement (Keller Associates' project number) or
otherwise identify the invoice in such a manner as the OWNER may reasonably
require.
3.3 The CONSULTANT shall not take any action hereunder which could cause the amount
for which OWNER would be obligated to CONSULTANT to exceed the sum of the fees
defined in the Attachment provided, however, that this sum may be increased or
decreased from time to time by the OWNER in writing if extra work is required or the
1960391agremnt.doc
OS129/97
~ ~
scope of work is adjusted for any reason. For other than lump sum (fixed fee)
agreements, CONSULTANT shall advise ihe ~WNER in writing when costs incuned
under this Agreement are equal to seventy-five percent (75%} of the aforesaid sum.
4. DATA
CONSULTANT agrees that all data and information such as designs, drawings, reports,
blueprints, and the like generated in the performance of this Agreement and data and information
which are speci~c to be delivered or which are, in fact, delivered pursuant to this Agreement
shall be and remain the sole property of ~WNER. CONSULTANT shall deliver all data and
information to the OWNER upon OWNER's request, and shall be fully responsible for the care
and protection thereof untit such delivery. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, said
documents shall be delivered to OWNER without additional costs to OWNER.
5. TERMINATION
The OWNER and CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement in whole or in part at any time
be giving 30 days written notice thereof. Upon said termination, CONSULTANT will be
reimbursed for that portiorr of the work satisfactorily completed prior to termination and shall be
entitled to reasonable damages.
6. CHANGES
The OWNER, within the general scope of this Agreement, may at any time, by written notice to
C(3NSLJLTANT, issue additional instructions, requice additional services, or direct the omission
of services covered by this A,greement. In such event, there will be made an equitable adjustment
in price and time of performance, but any claim by either part for such an adjustment must be
made within thiRy (30) days of the receipt of said written notice.
7. CONIPLIANCE WITH LAWS
To the extent applicable hereto, CONSULTANT shall in the performance of this Agreement
comply with all Federal, State, and local laws, all regulations and orders issued under any
applicabie law, and all State regulations.
8. STANDARDS
All services hereunder shall be performed by employees or agents of CONSULTANT who are
experienced and highly skilled in their professions and in accordance with the standards of
workmanship in their professions. CONSULTANT wamants that its findings, recommendations,
and professional advice shall be based on practices and procedures customarily used in its
profession and asserts it wili employ the current state-of-the-art and accepted standard industry
practice in performing the services defined herein.
9. RECORDS
The OWNER and, if the services are to be performed hereunder relate to a Federal or State
Government Contract, the Comptroller Genera! of the United States, and the Department or
Agency of the Government having cognizance over said prime Contract, and any of their duly
1960:i9/agremnt.doc
05/29197
~ i
authorized representatives, shall, until the expiration of 3 years after final payment under this
Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents,
papers, and records of CONSULTANT involving transactions related to this Agreement.
10. GRATUITIES
CONSULTANT warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has
offered or given any gratuities to OWNER's employees, agents, or representatives with a view
toward securing this Agreement or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto.
11. INSURANCE
CONSULTANT shall provide professiona) liability indemni~cation to protect the OWNER and
granting agencies from CONSULTANT's negligent acts and errors of omission of a professional
nature. The totat aggregate of CONSULTANT's professional liability shall be limited to fifty
thousand dollars ($SU,Q00) or twice the amount of CONSULTANT's fee, whichever is more.
12. CITY FURNISHED SERVICES
The following services would be providerl by the City of Meridian in completion of this project:
a. Provide drawings of existing sewer facilities, zomng, and land use and population
projections.
b. Provide the updated model for the sewage coilection system. This model will be either a
Hydra computer model or comparable model updated for new tand use and population
projections.
c. Provide to the CONSULTANT coliection system pipe condition evaluations through City
sponsored T.V. inspection work.
d. Provide field flow measucement data to document the UI conditions and iocations.
196039Jagrcmnt.doc
05/29/97
~
~
In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.
CLIENT: City of Meridian CONSLILTAIV'T: Keller Associates, P.A.
By:
Title:
Attested:
By:
Title:
By: 4'•~
James L. Kelter
Title: President
Attested: ~-y~•:o- >~
sy: ~~.~~.~ ..~c~.Liko~en
Title: p~o iP ~~ ~Na-n~9~r
146039lagremnt.doc
05f29l9?
~ ~
SCOPE UF WORK ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF MERIDIAN
SEWER FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY ADDENDUM
1.1 P~tOJECT ADMINISTRATION:
The CONSULTANT will provide general administration services related to coordination
of needed personnel for the project. In house coordination and staffing requirements will
be reviewed monthly to assure that the project is on schedule and within budget.
The CONSULTANT will take responsibility as directed by the (?WNER to coordinate
other ongoing studies and recommendations. The CONSULTANT will also assist the
OWNER in scheduling the quality control reviews with DEQ and City personnel.
CONSULTANT will be responsible to submit and receive approval of this Facilities
Planning Study Addendum from DEQ.
1.2 GEOGRAP~iIC FEATURES:
A. Base Map Transfer: AlI original Facilities Planning Study maps, inclvding
zoning, land use and base maps will be provided by the OWNER to the
CONSLTLTANT. These maps will be transferred by disc in AutoCad to the
CONSLTLTANT's computer.
B. Base Mapping: The base mapping will be extended to include the new land use
area and infra-structure planning area as presently proposed by the City.
C. Surface and Ground Water: Data used for the Addendum shall be the Surface
and Ground Water data that was prepared in the original Facilities Planning Study.
This data will be transferred to the CONSULTANT's database.
D. Soils: The soils documentation that was completed in the original Facilities
Planning Study will alsa be transferred to the CONSULTANT's database.
1.3 DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:
A. Population Projections: The OWNER will provide the CONSULTANT with the
most current available population projections from the OWNER's planning
department. The CONSULTANT will verify the population projections with
APA, Idaho Power, and Department of Commerce. Where papulation projections
vary, an agreed upon population projection will be selected between the
CONSULTANT and the OWNER.
B. Land Use: The new land use plan will be incorporated into the study. The
comprehensive study contains the land use that will be utilized for this Facilities
Planning Study Addendum. Therefore, data will be transfened from the
comprehensive plan to the Addendum.
• •
SCOPE OF WORK ATTACHMENT A
1.4 WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATION:
A. I& I Verification: An I&I evaluation was completed as part of the original
Facilities Planning Study. This original I&I study will be modified based on new
flow measurements that will be provided throughout the collection system by the
OWNER. This addendum will therefore include the verification of I&I and the
presentation of new I&I data in the report, but will not include any field flow
measurements or data collection.
B. Wastewater Parameters: Present and future wastewater characteristics such as
flow and biological concentration will be presented in the report.
C. Future Flow and Loading Projections: Based on the population arrived at
above, future flow and loading projections will be presented in the report by the
CONSULTANT.
1.5 COLLECTION SYSTEM:
A. Hydra Computer System Modeling: The OWNER will complete the hydra
- computer modeling for existing -and future flow canditinns. The OWNER will
provide this-mod~ling data to the CONSULTANT.
B. Master Planning: Based upon the model completed by the OWNER the
CONSULTANT will prepare mapping and cast estimates for needed collection
system and intercep[or line improvements. This master plan including mapping
and cost estimates will be prepared hand-in-hand with the OWNER's
representatives.
C. Existing Pipe Condition: The OWNER will complete pipe condition evaluation
utilizing maintenance record informatian and actual TV inspection of the sewer
lines. The CONSULTANT will prepare mapping and develop a priority for
upgrading, replacing and repairing needed sewer lines. A capital improvement
plan will be prepared complete with cost estimates and priorities by the
CONSULTANT.
1.6 WASTEWATER TREATMENT
A. Existing Plant Capacity: The existing plant capacity will be documented by the
CONSULTANT and presented in the Facilities Planning Study report.
B. Treatment Plant Options:
1. Bio-selectors: The addition of Bio-selectors to the existing treatment plant
will be evaluated and cost estimated as a viable treatment plant option to
provide nutrient removal.
! •
SCOPE OF WORK ATTACHMENT A
2. Oxidation Ditch: A preliminary conceptual layout of a pazallel oxidation
ditch treatment plant, including O& M costs will be developed, which
will provide comparable nutrient removal to the Bio-selector option above.
3. Seauencing Batch Reactors: A preliminary layout of a sequencing batch
treatment plant process, including O& M costs will also be developed,
which will provide comparable nutrient removal capabiiities as the
oxidation ditch and the Bio-selector treatment plant processes above.
C. Disinfection Presentation: CONSULTANT will present the cost necessary to
provide ultraviolet light disinfection for the proposed future population and plant
expansion.
D. Disposal Options: On a preliminary basis the CONSULTANT will summarize
the possibilities and costs for various wastewater disgosal options. These options
will include the following:
1. Five Mile CreeklRiver Dischar~e: The CONSULTANT will evaluate the
possibility of discharging all effluent to Five Mile Creek and to the river
with their associated costs. It is anticipated -that if nutrient removal is as
successful as planned, discharge to Five Mile Creek should be allowed
thus eliminating the need to develop a new pump station and pressure line
for discharge to the Boise River.
2. Re-use Possibilities: The CONSULTANT will provide a preliminary
review of the possibility for irrigation re-use during the summer period of
the wastewater effluent from the treatment plant. Contacts with irrigation
districts in the azea will be made to evaluate their willingness to use the
treated wastewater.
3. Rapid Infiltration: If the wastewater is treated to a groundwater quality by
removal of ammonia and nutrients, it is possible that disposal via a rapid
infiltration basin could be acceptable. The CONSULTANT wil! explore
this possibility with DEQ and prepaze associated costs for a rapid
infiltration disposal option.
1.7 APPARENT BEST ALTERNATIVE
A. Long-Term Treatment Facilities: Working hand-in-hand with the OWNER and
DEQ the CONSULTANT will rank the various alternatives for treatment and
disposal of the wastewater. The best apparent alternative with associated phasing
and costs will be presented in the report. The phasing recommendations will
provide staged development so that the City might increase the plant capacity in
modules as the population increases.
~
~
SCOPE OF WORK ATTACHMENT A
B. Callection System Plan: The CONSULTANT will work hand-in-hand again
with the OWNER to develop a phasing plan for the extension of needed
interceptor lines and replacement of deteriorated sewer collection piping.
1.8 REPORT PREPARATION
A. Draft Report: The CONSULTANT will prepare a draft Addendum tepart to the
1993 Facilities Planning Study.
B. Final Report: After receiving comments from the Public Hearing, the OWNER
and affected agencies a final report will prepared and ten copies provided to the
4WNER.
1.9 PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS
A. News Releas~s and Hearing Advertisements: The CONSULTANT will assist
the OWNER in preparing necessary ad~ertisements for the official public hearing.
The CONSULTANT will prepare public exhibits and hearing presentadon data
and will assist the OWNER in conducting an Open House Hearing for the
Facilities Plannibg Study. -
B. Hearing Transcript: The CONSULTANT will prepaze a hearing transcript
which will address all questions that are posed at the Public Hearing.
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION DOCUMENT
A. EID Transfer: This task will include the transfer of the EID document
previously prepared in 1993 to the CONSULTANTS computer facilities.
B. EID Verification: A review of the EID document will completed to determine
the need for change and update.
C. Modify EID: Where necessary the EID will be upgraded and modified in
accordance with the appazent best alternative that is selected through the
Addendum process. The modified EID document will then be sent to all affected
agencies for comment and review. Once agency comments have been received
the EID document will be submitted to DEQ for final approval.
~
COMPENSATIDN
CITY OF MERIDIAN
SEWER FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY
ADDENDUM
1.
2.
3.
NOTICE TO PROCEED
ATTACHMENT B
The CONSULTANT shall not proceed with the work until receipt of a written Notice to
Proceed from the OWNER which details the date that the CONSULTANf may start to
work and the tasks authorized to be performed.
TIME SCHEDULE
Once the CONSULTANT has received a written Notice to Proceed from the OWNER,
work for the preparation of this Addendum to the sewer facilities planning study will be
completed within 240 days excluding DEQ review dme.
BASIS OF PAYMENT
CONSULTANT may, after actual work is st~ted, submit an invoice for the total amount of
work done and materials fumished by CONSLJI,TANT and incorporated into the work to
the end of the month in which the invoice is prepared. The amount to be paid by the
OVYNER to the CONSULTANT for the CONSULTANT's services rendered under
provisions of the Agreement are estimated as attached and shall be as follows:
The services described in Attachment A shall not exceed $44,304.00 for the FPS
Addendum and $3,864.00 for the EID document revision as shown on the attached
Man Day and Budget estimate sheet and shall be paid on an hourly rate basis in
accordance with the below rate schedule, which will be subject to change only based
on employee raises during the course of the project and prior approval by the
OWNER.
Payment shall be made by the OWNER to the CONSULTANT within 30 days of the date
of the invoice.
KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.
HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
Classification
Principal-In-Charge (Keller)
Project Engineer (Suihkonen)
Project Engineer (Linja)
Engineer (Coleman}
Engineer (Shreeve}
Designer
Technician
Secretary
Indirect Costs Exceeding $250
~
Hourly Rate
$88.00
80.00
80.00
55.0(}
55.00
50.00
38.Q0
31.00
Actual cost plus 10%
1960391aKach b.doC
May 29. t 997
~ ~
Meridian, Idaho
Eaciti6es Planaing Study Revision
Maa Days
Tasic PCtOCJP1I
588.00 Sr. Engineer
580.00 Engincer
SS5.00 Dratter
533.00 Ficld
538.00 perical
525.00
Tolal
1.1 Pro ect Administntion
a) Schedule and Bud cts ~ ~ sgpq,pp
b) Cit Reviews ~ ~ S9Q4,pp
c) A enc Coordination 2 2 s~.gpg.pp
1.2 rx tuc Features
a) Base Ma in Transfer 0_ 5 2 5748.00
b} BastM i Modifications 0. 5 4 S1,276.00
(New Im act Area)
c) 5urface and Groundwater Features 0. 5 5220.00
(Data Transfer & Vuficisaon)
d) Soils Data Transfer Qc Verification 0.5 5220.00
1.3 Ikm ra hic Iniormation
a) P (ation Pro' ion Verification 0. 5 2 51,200.00
b) L.and Use Data Transfer 0.5 1. 5 S616.00
1.4 Wastewater C6araeterization
a) UI Vuification Q.5 2 S 1,200.00
b) Wasuwatu Parameters 0.5 5320.00
c) Future Flow and I.oadin 0.5 5320.00
LS Colkctan S
a) HYDRA S sttm ModeGn 0.5 S3S2.00
b) Master Ptan 0.5 3 S 52,992.00
c) ~» ~ ~~~+ ` 2 3 S1.672.00
(Dau from Cit )
1.6 R'utewater.Trratment
a) EzisOn Piant Ca ci ! 5640.00
b) Treatment Pfant O 'ons
1) Bio-Selector ! 1 5840.00
2j Ozidarion Dicch U.5 3 1 52,536.00
3) SBR 3 ! 52,184.00
c) Disinfcttion Presentadon 0.5 5320.00
d) Dis O 'ons
t) 5-Mile Qnck/Rivcr 1 I 1 51.544.00
2) Re-use Possibilitits 0.5 2 1 51.83200
3) Ra id Infiltration 1 2 S 1.984_QU
L9 A rent Sest Alternatives
a) (.on -teem Ttoatment 0.5 2 1 S 1.896.00
c) Coficcrion S scem I 1 2 S 1.87200
1.8 R P ratioa
a) Draft Re I 2 4 4 5 SS,8U0.00
b) Finai Re rt ! 1 1 S 1.104.00
L4 PaWic Partici tioo
a) News Releasts and Hearian Advertisements 1 2 S 1.104.00
b) Public Nearin 2 2 2 4 1 54.824.00
c) Htarin Tranuri and Answer Questions 0.5 O.S 2 51,07?.00
(Use Houu Format)
SUB-TOTAL 14 24 17S 29S 0 18 544,304.00
2.O Eovirnnmrntal IotO~wa80n DoeumeOt
a) Transfer EID ~ SZpp,pp
b) Verif EID ~ s6qp.pp
c) Modif for Seiected tion 0.5 2 3 3 51.024.Q0
SUB-TOTAL OS 3 0 3 0 4 S3.$64.00
TOTALS 14.5 27.0 17.5 32.5 Q.0 22.0 548,168.00
uI1W7 Pape 1 d 2 t:~wwM~9502~~FPS~~ev.