Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995 01-03 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TUESDAY, JANUARY 3, 1995 - 7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 15, 1994: (APPROVED) MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD DECEMBER 20, 1994: (APPROVED) CLAIRE BOWMAN - APA: UPDATE ON DRAINAGE BILL LEGISLATION: (APPROVED) 2. TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR TUTHILL ESTATES NO. 2 SUBDIVISION: (TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 17, 1995) 3. TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994:DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTFOR WATERBURY PARK SUBDIVISION NO. S: (TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 17, 1995) 4. TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR THE LANDING SUBDNISION NO.7 BY SKYLINE DEVELOPMENT: (TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 17, 1995) 5. TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR SUMMERFIELD SUBDMSION NO. 1 AND 2: {TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 17, 1995) 6. TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR SUMMERFIELD SUBDMSION N0.3: (APPROVED) 7. AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST FOR GROVE RUN SUBDMSION BY JLG BUILDERS: (TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 17, 1995) 8. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GROVE RUN SUBDMSK)N BY JLG BUILDERS TABLED AT DECEMBER 15, 1994 MEETING: (TABLED JANUARY 17, 1995) 9. REVISED FINAL PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE N0.3 BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT: (TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 17, 1995) 10. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE N0.3 BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT: (TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 17, 1995) 1. ORDINANCE #687 - GREENHAVEN ESTATES ANNEXATION: (APPROVED) 12. ORDINANCE #688 -LANG REZONE: (APPROVED) 13. ORDINANCE #689 - DANBURY FAIR ANNEXATION: (TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 17, 1995) ~14. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY LAWRENCE AND SHIRLEY CHETWOOD: (APPROVED) 15. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY WOLFE WHEELER DEVELOPMENT GROUP: (APPROVED) 16. APPLICATION FOR BEER AND WINE LICENSE BY SALVADOR SANCHEZ dba FIESTA II INC.:(APPROVED SUBJECT TO CHIEF OF POLICE APPROVAL) 17. CONVENTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR FIRELIGHT ESTATES: (APPROVED) ,~ 18. WATERlSEWER/TRASH DELINQUENCIES: (APPROVED) 19. APPROVE BILLS: (APPROVED) 20. DEPARTMENT REPORTS: A. GARY SMITH, CITY ENGINEER 1. RAILROAD CROSSING AGREEMENT FOR MERIDIAN ROAD: (APPROVED) 2. CHERRY LANE ROAD -WATER LINE CONSTRUCTION: ACRD AGREEMENT: (APPROVED) B. CHIEF GORDON, POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. PURCHASE OF 2 PATROL CARS: (APPROVED) ,/ C. MAX YERRINGTON, COUNCILMAN 1. RESOLUTION #161: (APPROVED) ~ i MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TUESDAY, JANUARY 3, 1995 - 7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 15, 1994: ta~~c'i~v~- MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD DECEMBER 20, 1994: r~`Pi w~.- 1. CLAIRE BOWMAN - APA: UPDATE ON DRAINAGE BILL LEGISLATION:. ~L~~Oi'v%c.- ~-a-Lt' /~f~~.r/a/'~'or/ G'rn~zc:i~-.-+~=,~~a' 2. TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR TUTHILL ESTATES N0.2 SUBDMSION: -~ ~ /~-~ ~ Tl"~ ~7 ~.t ~~"~ 3. TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994:DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENT FOR WATERBURY PARK SUBDIVISION NO. S: t~~ uatif~7 ,T~h• /7 rz~ tdu- (lF~li'l/C'.CGh~J fF' /~ ti.Ql f 4. TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR THE LANDING SUBDIVISION N0.7 BY SKYLINE DEVELOPMENT: -ft ~ G;.~i~ ~a n . / 7 ~ ~+ et fi x~ a f fz.e a~~o i~ zci-~-r1 v~eY...el f- 5. TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR SUMMERFIELD SUBDMSION NO. 1 AND 2: fabe~ ~~~fiZ ~/ir~r.. J ? ~ h1.¢e ti 6. TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION NO. 3: tx~,r~~<~~ !~l /~ R`:o~ro+/2 IM.a~s"Z 9 er~j Gfe~lt -lv d~,~/~-' 7. AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST FOR GROVE RUN SUBDMSION BY JLG BUILDERS: ~a~ ~ ~ ~' .Ta..~ ~ is 8. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GROVE RUN SUBDIVISION BY JLG BUILDERS TABLED AT DECEMBER 15, 1994 MEETING: ~!~ ~~~'' ~Tti,., . / 1 '= H-eL 17 9. REVISED FINAL PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 3 BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT: -~'z ~-e u,nti7 .7~^ ~ ~ ~ '`' ~`~'• 10. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE N0.3 BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT: ~zt 6Ce ct ~fi ? eT~-. • / ? {~-ee h~. j 11. ORDINANCE#687 - GREENHAVEN ESTATES ANNEXATION: ~~/ YO /'e 12. ORDINANCE #888 -LANG REZONE: Gc~J/YiYev 2.~ 13. ORDINANCE#689 - DANBURY FAIR ANNEXATION: ~ wh~i ~ `T~"' / ~ /2, Sze h 14. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY LAWRENCE AND SHIRLEY CHETWOOD: G-P~ro~e ~l~ < <'lL Q~pp~v~-c c~~~d~2~~-~":..e ~ 15. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY WOLFE-WHEELER DEVELOPMENT GROUP: ap~rwe ~/~ ~ t,-1t 16. APPLICATION FOR BEER AND WINE LICENSE BY SALVADOR 3AN~CHEZ d~ FIESTA II INC.: u~;~rD~l' ;fu-~j`ject fv l'/T,r>~nf~vG gip' 17. CONVENTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR FIRELIGHT ESTATES: ,~j~~/ro~~e 18. WATER/SEWER/TRASH DELINQUENCIES: ~/'/?~vU~ 19. APPROVE BILLS: a~JP r" ~ ~' 20. DEPARTMENT REPORTS: A. GARY SMITH, CITY ENGINEER 1. RAILROAD CROSSING AGREEMENT FOR MERIDIAN ROAD: ~p~-w~ 2. CHERRY LANE ROAD -WATER LINE CONSTRUCTION: ACHDAGREEMENT: ~~p~~i-ei f.~ S~~u c~~-.Li~ ~T~. 24' e y: vv P~ P/~ ~~. C"i~-i-~u~ f3eH;s - Vu ca.~`a-,a ~~ ~ic-~ d.F,~w y~WPYif~.4 ,{~~ 0.~ ~CG ~02 CLl2d F~ cl~" l7~ ~3~. /7~F~cufv ~t ~~c>O C>2~~v ~, ~/ti-t?f /'2orr~w - fJG~ti,ZtG/~ ~IJ~!-n,~~' {-erl- ou'n 6irri7u~ss F k~ ~~es~~ - ~~y ~ ~~,k~~~~ ~osUe 7~ a~ - y%l'. ez J f/~ph~~~' MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 3 1995 The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor Grant Kingsford at 7:30 P.M,: MEMBERS PRESENT: Walt Morrow, Max Yerrington, Ron Tolsma: OTHERS PRESENT: Will Berg, Wayne Crookston, Gary Smith, Shari Stiles, Chief Gordon, Claire Bowman, John Wasson, Larry Chetwood: MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 15, 1994: Kingsford: Are there any corcections, additions or deletions to those minutes? Motion to approve. Morrow: So moved Tolsma: Second Ingsford: Moved by Watt, second by Ron to approve of the December 15th minutes, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD DECEMBER 20, 1994: Kingsford: Any corrections to those minutes? Yercington: Mr. Mayor, 1 make a motion that we approve the minutes of the 20th of December, 1994. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve the December 20th minutes, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #1: CLAIRE BOWMAN - APA: UPDATE ON DRAINAGE BILL LEGISLATION: Kingsford: Let's pass over that. ITEM #2: TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR TUTHILL ESTATES NO. 2 SUBDIVISION: `J Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 2 ITEM #3: TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: WATERBURY PARK SUBDIVISION N0. 5: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR Kingsford: Council has received a letter asking fora 2 week delay, 1 would entertain a motion to table those for 2 weeks. Morrow; So moved Toisma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to table items 2 and 3 to the next Council meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #4: TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR THE LANDING SUBDIVISION NO. 7 BY SKYLINE DEVELOPMENT: Kingsford: Likewise request for table by the developer. They were unable to get their meeting put together with Nampa Meridian and so forth as we had discussed at the last meeting. I would entertain a motion to table that. Morrow: So moved Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to table item 4, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #5: TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION NO. 1 AND 2: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR Kingsford: Shari, what is the status with that? Stiles: On Number 1 and 2 that has been reviewed by myself and Wayne Crookston and approved but not signed by the developer at this point. The following item has been returned signed by the developer. Morrow: Those are 2 different developers are they not? Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 3 Stiles: Right Morrow: I would move to table Summerfield Subdivision No. 1 and 2, the development agreement until signed by the developer. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max, to table Summerrield Subdivision No. 1 and 2 development agreement until the next meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #6: TABLED DECEMBER 20, 1994: DEWELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR. SUMMERFIELD SUBDIVISION NO. 3: Kingsford: As Shari has indicated that has been signed and returned. Any questions about that? Morrow: My only question is that everything is in the proper order Shari? Stiles: Yes, I believe there are no problems at all with the development agreement. Morrow: And Wayne? Crookston: As far as I know, from my review of it. Kingsford: Well if you wouldn't know Counselor, pray tell me who would? Crookston: Can I have five minutes? It is ready. Kingsford: I would entertain a motion to approve. Morrow: So moved Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of the Summertield Subdivision No. 3 development, Max Boesiger, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 4 Kingsford: Does that require authorization to have the Mayor and City Clerk sign? Entertain that motion. Yerrington: So moved. Morrow: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Walt to allow the City Mayor and attorney to sign the development agreement with Summerfield Subdivision No. 3, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #7: AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST FOR GROVE RUN SUBDIVISION BY JLG BUILDERS: Kingsford: Has Council reviewed those findings? Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I will be abstaining from voting on both items #7 and 8. Kingsford: Counselor, what does that require then? If he abstains does that constitute a tie? Crookston: No it would not. Kingsford: A tie ff only 2 vote? Crookston: Yes it does, he is counted for quorum, but he is not counted in the voting at all. Kingsford: Having not been privy or consulted on the findings it would be my recommendation that be tabled until the next meeting when Mr. Corrie is here. 1 am not sure that I would agree with those findings, I am not sure that is fair to Mr. Corrie. Crookston: That is totally up to the Council. Tolsma: Mr. Mayor, I move we table this (inaudible) next meeting so we have the third councilman for the vote. Yerrington: Second Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 5 Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to table item 7 and 8 until the next meeting so as to have the third councilman here for the vote, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #9: REVISED FINAL PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 3 BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT: Kingsford: Has staffed reviewed that? Stiles: The applicant has resubmitted a final plat that we have sent back out to the agencies and is scheduled for 2 weeks from now, January 17th. They have resubmitted a final one which incorporated all of the previous finals and we have sent those out again to the agencies for their review for the 17th. Morrow: So then does it make sense to table this tonight until we have seen the final one in 2 weeks, is that what you are saying? Stiles: Yes Kingsford: I would assume Mr. Berg. Berg: I think Wayne Crookston could add to this. The situation being if they wanted a variance on those 2 lots and since the final plat they are submitting to us has those 2 lots with an applied variance already accepted we cannot act on that final plat until we act on the variance. Correct? Crookston: That is correct. Berg: And that is the next item. It was a carry over from a previous meeting and it was tabled for this meeting. And to get all the notices in we cannot act on the final plat tonight. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we table the final plat for the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 3 by Steiner Development until the next meeting on the 17th. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to table the revised final plat for the Lake at Cheny Lane No. 3 by Steiner Development until the next meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? ~J Meridian Ciry Council January 3, 1995 Page 6 MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: Where are we at then with the next item, the variance? Same thing. Crookston: I think that is the same position. I think that you could act on the findings on the variance. Shari? Stiles: The new final plat you have, this final plat that you will be acting on you just got a copy of today. It is something that you haven't really seen except at the prior meetings where it was presented by the applicant and now its one that everybody is going to see and it is going to be the final but it shows those 2 lots. The final plat that has been submitted shows those 2 lots as if the variance had been granted. So I would think that if the variance, if findings have been made and if they can be acted on it could be approved tonight if you desired. Kingsford: Does the Council have the adequate time to review that revised plat? (Inaudible) Kingsford: 1 would certainly recommend a table if you haven't seen it. Tolsma: We have the findings on the variance request. Kingsford: Right, but the variance request on those lots, until you know what they look like on the map I would surely be hesitant to grant. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I move that we table the findings of fact and conclusions of law for the variance request for the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 3 by the Steiner Development Corporation until January 17th. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to table the findings of fact and conclusions of law on the variance request for the Lake at Chery Lane No. 3 by the Steiner Development Corporation, alt those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #11: ORDINANCE #687 - GREENHAVEN ESTATES ANNEXATION: Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING ~~ Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 7 CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T. 3N, R. 1 W, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like to have Ordinance #687 read in its entirety? Seeing none I would entertain a motion on Ordinance #687. Yerrington: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve #687 with the suspension of the rules. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve Ordinance #687 with the suspension of the rules, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #12: ORDINANCE#688 -LANG REZONE: Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS THEN 1/2 OF LOT 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, BLOCK 1 OF F.A. NOURSE 3RD ADDITION, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would tike to have Ordinance #688 read in its entirety? Seeing none I would entertain a motion on #688. Tolsma: Mr. Mayor, I move we approve Ordinance #688 with the suspension of the rules. Yerrington: Second Ingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve Ordinance #688 with the suspension of the rules, Shari? Stiles: I had one comment, on the second to the last line on page 1 it says that property would be subject to rezone back to R-40, should that be amended to back to R-15? Crookston: Yes Kingsford: That is its current zoning is R-15 right? Crookston: I am not sure what the current zoning is Mr. Mayor! Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 8 Kingsford: You are saying that is R-15 now Shari? Stiles: Yes that is what is shown on my map I believe. Kingsford: What is the Council's pleasure? Do you want to withdraw the second and motion and amend that portion of it, have it revert to R-15 instead of R-40? (Inaudible) Kingsford: You withdraw the second? You withdraw the motion? Tolsma: Mr. Mayor, I move we approve Ordinance #688 with the addition in Section 3 on page 1 property shall be subject to rezone back to R-15, with suspension of the rules. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Ron, sec~rx! by Max to approve of Ordinance #888 with suspension of the rules, and to amend Section 3, line 2 to rezone back to R-15 instead of R-40, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Toslma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #13: ORDINANCE#689 - DANBURY FAIR ANNEXATION: Kingsford: Mr. Fredcleton, the assistant to the City Engineer has reviewed the legal description and has found some discrepancies in the description. The third parcel doesn't include hall of the right of way on Locust Grove Road. He recommends it tie tabled until we have the correct legal description. Morrow: So moved Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to table the Danbury Fair 5, 6, and 7 annexation Ordinance until the next meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #14: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY LAWRENCE AND SHIRLEY Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 9 CHETWOOD: Kingsford: At this time I will hear from the applicant or his designee. We want to hear your song and dance, we don't get Larry here very often so let's hear about it. Chetwood: Always a pleasure to come before the Council Mr. Mayor. I am Larry Chetwood, the owner of Meridian Ford, we made an application to the City to rezone the area on Overland, you all have it in front of you I assume, to relocate our dealership. Just a brief update on what has happened, Alan Gilso of the GGA Architectural Group will replace the VP group who has gotten me this far, with Shari and the Council and will get into the final design of building. We will have West One do the construction financing and we will have (inaudible) will be the contractor, that just happened today. I guess 1 would like to express to the Council an issue that could come up regarding a large investment on my part. This new dealership, and I guess I have to say of all the things that I have to deal with in the business, oil embargoes, interest rates, product shortages, all the things that a car dealer faces the one that scares me the most is the local options tax I am making a large investment here and if that kind of tax makes me uncompetitive in the market it could be devastating to my business. Just laying the groundwork for any future kind of issues knowing the position you assume (inaudible) on that. That said the only outstanding, 1 think Shari correct me if 1 am wrong, the only outstanding thing that we have is the landscaping issue and 1 think you all are working on a new ordinance that would cover car dealership types of construction and requirements there and I hope we can reach an agreement on that at some future date. Meridian Ford property will be sold to Zamzows on January 31st and I will be the proud owner of some new farmland over on Overland. Any questions you have for me? Kingsford: What is your construction time table Larry? Chetwood: Really the driving force here is that I have to be out of my current facility on October 15th, I become a renter to Zamzows. So it had better be by October 15th. That is the latest date. Kingsford: Does Council have any questions for Mr. Chetwood? Thank you Larry, I appreciate your interest and investment in Meridian. Has the Council reviewed those findings? Morrow: I have Mr. Mayor, I have just a quick question with respect to the trees. 1 know that we are working on the ordinance to (inaudible) landscaping stuff. It seems to me that even with, 1 have looked at the site plan showing 104 trees and that seems to me to be even beyond the line of reasonableness, that is a bunch of trees on a reasonably small parcel of ground. And the maintenance of that would I think be an almost full time job in Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 10 the fall for one person. I think that when we restructure the ordinance that we might bring to this a little more common sense. I don't know what the source of this was but it is clearly outside the bounds of reason from my perspective. Kingsford: Any other comments from the Council? Is there a motion on the findings? Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law as presented from P & Z, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: Entertain a motion on the conditional use permit. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that the City Councl of the City of Meridian approve the conditional use permit requested by the applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the findings of fact and contusions of law. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to approve of the conditional use permit with the conditions placid in findings of fact and conclusions of law for the applicant, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #15: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY WOLFE-WHEELER DEVELOPMENT GROUP: Kingsford: Entertain comments from the developers representative at this point. Wheeler: My name is Clyde Wheeler, (inaudible) we are looking to move another used car dealership along with some of our parts service and body shop into the Meridian area. We currently operate dealerships in Nampa-Caldwell and Boise as well. Today we met with Shari, I think we have a good. site plan for the particular location that we are at. We Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 11 too would echo Larry Chetwood's issues on the trees and the environmental problems that it creates for our automobiles and the paint and so forth. Your consideration that would be greatly appreciated on our behalf as well. 1 really don't have that much to say, we pretty much worked everything out with the people here at the City. Kingsford: Does Council have any questions for Mr. Wheeler? Thank you, has the Council reviewed the findings for that? Entertain a motion on those, Ron do you have a question? Tolsma: (Inaudible) Crookston: That was to be filled in by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Council. We did the same thing on, excuse me for going bads to ancient history, on Larry Bames' Rountree Chevrolet. I don't recall the decibel rating that was set but it was left up to the City to determine what they wanted there. Tolsma: We ran into that problem at another business in town and found that (inaudible) that is why I wondered if a decibel rating is needed here or (inaudible). Kingsford: I think though Ron when you are talking about a loudspeaker though Ron a decibel meter is more appropriate than when you are talking about milling machinery. I think a reasonable decibel level not more than 60 off the property might be reasonable. Tolsma: (Inaudible) Morrow: Is that 100 feet from the speaker or 100 feet from the property. Tolsma: 100 feet from the property or wherever the closest (inaudible). Morrow: What was the decibels for the other dealership on Fairview, Rountree? Kingsford: 1 want to say 65 but I can't remember for certain. Crookston: I don't recall either Grant. Kingsford: Was that ever researched Shari do you know? Stiles: I just know Boise keeps theirs at 55 and that is particularly for drive thrus with the loud speakers there. We have had a problem with Rountree with, they haven't put in al their landscaping yet and it is a problem for people down wind from where those loud speakers are. • Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 12 s Tolsma: (Inaudible) Stiles: 55 is what I believe in Boise they had. Tolsma: Didn't Boise just establish a noise ordinance (inaudible). Morrow: It was one of their goals in 1995. Tolsma: (Inaudible) Morrow. I think all the issues that they are dealing with their are things like boom boxes, and barking dogs, trying to arrive at some sort of noise level or method of measuring it. 1 think at this point Ron it is all conceptual. Kingsford: I think the reality is that you are going to have more decibels from Fairview in this instance by far than you are going to have a loudspeaker. But still there has to be some concern about it. Particularly if they are pointed at the parking lo# which would be toward Fairview, but it is still appropriate, when we are talking we are talking at about 60 to 65 decibels. Morrow: So let's adopt 60 and insert 60 into the document and move on if that is agreeable with everybody? Tolsma: (Inaudible) Morrow: Well, Ron, I am not comfortable putting a footage on it because I don't know where you measure the feet from. You can have a speaker right on the property line and move 100 feet away and it has to be 60 decibels and that would cover somebody's entire house. Kingsford: I think it realistically should be at the property line and I don't think that is going to be a problem (inaudible). Morrow: Okay, let's structure it to say limited to 60 decibels at the property line. Kingsford: That page and paragraph again Ron? Tolsma: Page 11, paragraph G (inaudible). Kingsford: Is there a motion on the findings now? Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move that we approve the findings of fact and conclusions of • ! Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 13 law as written. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved b Walt, second by Ron to approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law as written for the Wolfe-Wheeler conditional use, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: Entertain a motion to approve the conditional use then. Tolsma: So moved Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve the conditional use permit request for Wolfe-Wheeler Development Group, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #16: APPLICATION FOR BEER AND WINE LICENSE BY SALVADOR SANCHEZ DBA FIESTA II INC.: Kingsford: Chief have you reviewed the request? Gordon: (Inaudible) Kingsford: We have all the licenses and so forth from fhe County and we have received check. Berg: We have everything here I don't know why it didn't get to them. Kingsford: When was that sent to the police department? Berg: (Inaudible) Morrow: Mr. Mayor, is it appropriate to approve the application subject to Chiefs review and approval and authorize the Clerk and Mayor to sign, 'rf so then I would make that motion. Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 14 Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of the Beer, Wine license for Salvador Sanchez, Fiesta It Inc. subject to the Chiefs review and approval and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign that Beer and Wine License, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM # 17: COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR FIRELIGHT ESTATES: Kingsford: Counselor has reviewed those and made note back that they meet with his approval. Crookston: That is correct. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, 1 would move that we approve the covenants, conditions and restrictions for Firelight Estates Subdivision. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve the CC&R's for Firelight Estates Subdivision, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #18: WATER/SEWER/TRASH DELINQUENCIES: Kingsford: This is to inform you in writing if you choose to you have the right to a pre- determination meeting at 7:30 P.M. January 3rd 1995 t~efore the Mayor and City Council to appear in person and be judged on the facts and defend the claim made by the City that your sewer, water and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel. Your service will be discontinued on the 11th of January 1995 unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone from the public that would like to contest their sewer, water and trash delinquency? Seeing none I would entertain a motion to approve the turn off list. Tolsma: So moved Yerrington: Second Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 15 Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve the turn off list, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial court pursuant to Idaho Code, even though they appeal their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn off list this month is $29,262.53. This is early in the month, part of the reason, I hope that goes down substantially before the turn off. ITEM #19: APPROVE BILLS: Tolsma:'Mayor, I move we approve the bills. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve the bills, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #20: DEPARTMENT REPORTS: Kingsford: Mr. Smith Smith: Mr. Mayor and Council members, I have 2 items this evening. The first one is an agreement that we returned to Union Pack Railroad for replacing the sewer line crossing in Meridian Road under the railroad. They suggested that since the City Mayor needs to sign for the City Council that we have a resolution approving this agreement or the signature on this agreement. Morrow: So moved Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to do, what are you saying to draw a resolution? Morrow: Or authorize the Mayor to sign for the City Council in whatever format that needs to be done. If we do a resolution then that means it will have to be drawn and delay the Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 16 process 2 more weeks. What 1 am after here is an acceptable format so this process and this contract can move forward posthaste. Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to approve of the Mayor and City Clerk signing the appropriate documents whether they be resolution or minutes, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: Are you saying then that they want a resolution so that should be drafted? Smith: 1 don't think so Mr. Mayor, I think just the formal a~ptance of the agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement would be fine. The second item I have is the ACRD agreement that needs to be executed between the City and ACRD concerning the installation of a water line on Cherry Lane Road. We did this same thing on Meridian Road when they rebuilt it from Cherry Lane North to Ustick. Basically what this does is allows, it tells the highway district we will reimburse them for the monies that they pay the contractor to install a water line. This water line is being constructed by the roadway contractor and was an addendum to the bid process for the highway district. Wayne Crookston has looked at this agreement and has made some modifications and 1 think that they basically incorporate some state code requirements. Crookston: Yes they do. Smith: And so 1 just request the City Council approval for the Mayor to sign this agreement, it takes attest by the City Clerk also. Morrow: So moved Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the ACRD agreement on the water line construction on Cherry Lane Road, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Smith: Thank you Mr. Mayor, that is all 1 have, thank you Council. Kingsford: Shari Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 17 Stiles: I just had one item, the Block Grant for the Community Development Block Grant for the Senior center requires a public hearing to be held. There has been one scheduled for January 24th at 8:00, I hope you can all be there. You will all be there for the workshop which I believe is beginning at 6:30 Will? Berg: Yes Stiles: Also at that time will be a public hearing for the vacation of the Farmington Estates Subdivision for Ed Bews which was inadvertently left off the list. That is all I had tonight. Kingsford: That will be noticed on that meeting as well. Morrow: Those are at our workshop meeting on the 24th? Kingsford: Following it, I made an executive decision that that we would have the workshop meeting at 6:30 and terminate that by 8:00 so we could have the hearing for the Senior citizens on their Community Development Block Grant application and now Shari informs also the item on the vacation of Farmington Subdivision (inaudible). Morcow: So we are changing our schedule from 7:00 to 6:30 on the 24th? Kingsford: Correct. Chief Gordon: I have one item and that is the purchase of patrol cars. The Idaho State Police received their bids back on police vehicles and it was awarded to Randy Hanson Chevrolet out of Twin Falls, Idaho. The bid per car came in at $17,639.80, I requested 2 vehicles in my budget and would like to authorization to purchase those 2. Kingsford: Are you going to be able to squeeze that into your budget though Chief? Gordon: Yes sir I believe so, Councilman Yerrington and I have looked over the budget quite closely since he had talked to you, I had an item in there on the transcription equipment which 1 will hold off on the purchase of. These 2 vehicles are desperately needed because of the growth and the size of the town, we are running over cars a lot quicker than we did before. Morrow. 1 have a question, where is the money for these vehicles, wasn't that part of that grant that we were getting for the 2 STEP officers? Gordon: No sir S Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 18 Morrow: Is there 2 additional vehicles to their 2 cars? Gordon: These are their 2 cars, that grant didn't cover vehicles or weapons. Morrow: I see okay, so when we accepted the grant money we committed, our match was the vehicles and the weapons. Gordon: It was Kingsford: As I discussed with Mr. Yerrington, after he met with the Chief today, he discussed the amended budget later on in the year and I said to him don't be purchasing cars on that basis because we have to have additional money before we can amend the budget. So he went bads to the Chief and they re-examined that and will hold off purchase. Gordon: The vehicles came in at $2600 more than I budgeted for per vehicles. Morrow: It is $5200 then? Gordon: Correct Morrow: And that is where, if push come to shove that money will come out of the transcription money? Gordon: Yes sir, I will hold off on the purchase of that till later in the year. Tolsma: (inaudible) Gordon: All I know is Chevrolet was the lowest, the last 2 years Chevrolet has received the bids and they have been going about $300 to $500 more each year. That is what I anticipated and also what the State Police anticipated and Boise. I am buying 2 vehicles and the State is buying 50 so you know what their amount is going to total. Kingsford: Chief, very often Boise does a separate process and have in fact been. lower in the past. Is that stilt a possibility? Gordon: At the present time they have not awarded their bid. These vehicles have to be ordered by the 15th of this month or we can no longer order them from Randy Hanson, that is the cut off, January 15th. I have held off as tong as I dare right now. Last year the focal bid from Rountree Chevrolet I think came in at about $100 mare than the State bid, but then there was a delivery fee from Twin Falls to here which was about $106 or $107 and Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 19 we chose to go locally and stay with Rountree. So I didn't use the State bid last year. have been staying pretty close with the people at Boise and they still have not awarded their bid. Morrow: Are they going with local bids besides (inaudible). Gordon: They haven't awarded it yet, so I don't know. Morrow: I mean have we even solicited a local bid from anybody? Gordon: No Morrow: So we don't even know what that comparison is? Gordon: No, last year was the first year I went with other bids and for the reason I couldn't bid separately for 2 vehicles and equal the prices that the State was getting for 50 and 60 cars. Boise, I think their minimum amount is 10 to 12 cars and they can stay pretty competitive where I couldn't. So I have been using their public agency Gause which I am allowed to use. So I don't even go out. Kingsford: Well, given the length of time that they are taking to get those cars on line I would suggest that we do as the chief requests and authorize him to order those cars sc long as it stays within the capital expenditure budget. Morrow: So moved Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to authorize the Chief to purchase 2 cars at the aforementioned price as long as he stays within the capital improvements budget, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: It is my sad duty to inform Mr. Bowman that he is late and has done missed his chance. Sorry, I guess we could ask Council if they want to reopen agenda Item #1? Morrow: That will be fine. (Inaudible) Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 20 Kingsford: Mr. Bowman, front and center, you had better have a good explanation for being late. Early in the morning I request notes from home and all of that. Bowman: My apologies, we were with the Garden City City Council. We ended up having a number of people from the water district there and drainage districts. As you may recall and I thank you very much for your willingness to tolerate our late arrival here. As you may recall I was here 2 months ago to present to you the concept for a single county wide drainage district. I gave you a draft copy of the bill at that point and a brief description of some of its features. Recently 1 sent you an executive summary of the legislation and requested an opportunity to seek an endorsement of the concept from you. With me tonight is Danyl Hanson from the Ada County Highway District who is the person already doing much of the work, the technical side of the work. He is here to answer any questions on the technical side. We believe we have crafted a bill that tries to solve 2 needs. One is the need to take what is currently being done and do it in a bit more organized way and a bit more legally perhaps. The Ada County Highway District is currently restricted by its charter doing any drainage work outside the roadway right of way. Yet in practice they are often called upon to do exactly that. This legislation essentialy empowers them to do that so they do not face the negative consequences that might occur if somebody challenged them on it. Also, it provides a way to address the national pollution discharge elimination requirements which are currently being imposed on the City of Boise in a manner that does not require all residents of Ada County to share in the financial consequences of that. It consolidates the drainage and storm water management of all the existing entities into a single one for those who have only drainage responsibilities it makes them go out of existence, there are 7 like that I think. There are 4 or drainage districts and there are 2 flood control districts or parts of 2 flood control districts. We believe it establishes day to day management under and existing agency and that is good rather than setting up a separate taxing entity. We have also provided I believe satisfactorily for individual city control over the budget of that agency, at least a portion of Ada County Highway District's budget that goes for drainage. That we have provided reasonable mechanisms to transfer the assets of the existing agencies to the new one and compensate the people who have paid for those over time. And to establish a user fee funding mechanism for long term finance, those are really the key pieces of what is going on in this legislation. Our request is that you endorse this concept, my goal if you do that is to take your endorsement to the legislators outside of Ada County and help use that as a way to convince some of them to support this as well. It obviously takes more than just the Ada County delegation to implement it. We would also request that, I might request, I don't know of any opposition within Ada County legislative delegation at this point but I might also request if you do endorse the concept of the drainage district that you (End of Tape) presentation 1 would be happy to answer questions. Kingsford: Questions for Mr. Bowman on the drainage district? 1 reviewed the draft Claire, Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 21 I applaud your efforts it is something that has long been needed I think in this County. Longer than I have been here certainly. And it does provide us a vehicle to deal with that. I applaud your efforts and it looks like a real good effort to me. Questions of the Council? Morrow: 1 guess I do have a question, what happens if the proposed draft legislation is altered fairly radically by somebody's input by outside of Ada County. Bowman: Obviously that is not under our control. Morrow: I know that, so the deal is if its passed? Bowman: Oh I see I misinterpreted your question. Kingsford: I think what you are needing to do then Walt is either through Claire or through the Association of Cities have that followed and stay on top and give input. Should it be altered where you are not satisfied with it, if this has been changed to where you no longer endorse it we need to have a trail on that and make sure that we register that with our delegation. Bowman: I misunderstood your question, if that is what you meant, I can certainly monitor and I would be happy to report back to you. Morrow: We have a proposed legislation that is subject to the majority of both the senate and the house that are outside of Ada County and if the thing is altered to the point of it is not acceptable and then passed and it doesn't work for our citizens we want no part of it. Bowman: I agree. Morrow: So that was a hypothetical question I understand that but I think what I am after here is to get some sort of mechanism to make sure that doesn't in fact happen. Kingsford: I think that would be handled very nicely, probably both by the highway district and the APA and Association of Cities, probably the Association of Counties. Bowman: I would be happy to personally report back to you if there are any changes made. Kingsford: If there is no opposition I would entertain a motion to approve of their draft legislation. Yerrington: So moved Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 22 Morrow: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Walt to approve of the draft legislation for the APA on the drainage district, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: We will have the City Clerk strike a letter to that effect and get it in the mail. Bowman: Thank you very much Mr. Mayor and Council. Kingsford: Counselor? Crookston: Nothing. Kingsford: Mr. Morrow? Morrow: Yes, one item, I need some, my constnaction company is going to be doing some work within the City of Meridian. I need some guidance from you and the Council with rasped to how inspections should be handled. Whether we go outside at my expense and pay for outside inspectors or the procedures that we ought to take so that there is no appearance of any improprieties or conflicts of interest. I know that this issue will come up again in the future, t would like a format from you now so that we can follow it consistently. Kingsford: I applaud your concern Walt, and if it alright with you I would like to maybe work with the City of Nampa, have Mr. Davis or if that doesn't work maybe somebody from Boise. Particularly since that is your department 1 would far rather that they not be the inspectors on your jobs. Morrow: And I agree with that. Kingsford: Further, I would rather not see them that is our inspectors obtain an inspector, I would personally rather that I do that or the Council. Morrow: I have no problem with that either. Kingsford: Let me know when that is about to happen and I will get with someone to. Max? Yerrington: Resolution 161, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian in Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 23 support of the state general revenue sharing to cities, counties and school districts. Whereas the Association of Idaho Cities supports the allocation of 8% of the states general revenue from income tax to cities, counties and school districts, and; Whereas, Idaho cities have only the most hated tax the local property tax to rely on and meet growing budget demands, and; Whereas, our new Governor Phil Batt has declared property tax relief to be a high priority in his administration. Therefore the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby resolves to request the Idaho Legislature provide property tax relief by supporting the Association of Idaho Cities proposal to provide 45 million, 8% of the state income tax revenue shared equally with the cities, counties, and school districts such that the cities and counties will be required to deposit 50°r6 of all the money in a property tax relief fund and schools will be allowed to use these funds only as they match for their capital improvement bonds. Morrow: I have a question, does that 50% of the money that the school receives or 100°k of the money the school receives? Yerrington: 1 don't know. Kingsford: Their bill goes for 50%. Mr. Cowie who is on the AIC Legislative Committee, again would have made this but he is not here so Mr. Yen'ington who is on the AIC Board asked to handle that. It is a 50°~ match for school district in an effort to reduce the cost for providing new capital facilities for school district particularly in areas that are growing such as ourselves. Morrow: So, as 1 understand it the intent of this is 50% of the monies that would come to cities, counties and school districts would be used for capital improvements or a capital debt relief, the other 50% could be used for ongoing cost to run the entity, is thak was this is driving to? Kingsford: Correct, in essence you are talking about 50% either being property tax reduction or non increased from the property tax via capital improvement. Is there a motion on Resolution #161? Yerrington: I make the motion that we approve Resolution #161 as read. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Ron to approve of Resolution #161 as eloquently read, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: AIt Yea Meridian City Gouncil January 3, 1995 Page 24 Kingsford: Anything else Mr. Yerrington? Yerrington: Nothing. Kingsford: Mr. Tolsma? Tolsma: How are we coming with the funds for this property across the street over here for the parking lot? Have we figured where we are at on the monies yet? Stiles: I haven't, they are still waiting on an audit for earlier year. I don't have any exact figures or anything to give them yet. Have you been talking to Mr. Cox? Tolsma: They don't have anything, even a rough idea on what we have got? Stiles: Ik appears from what I have looked at so far is that we are over budget on the improvements that have been done so far on both phase 1 and phase 2 of downtown Meridian. So I guess that would tell you there is nothing left. If there is someway we can look at the audits and see what has been budgeted and what is reserved. We may be able to Kingsford: You haven't been able to ascertain out of those files where Mr. Forrey thought there was $15,000 to $20,000? Stiles: That was at the very beginning of the project when it was first budgeted and 1 don't know maybe Gary can speak more to how bids came in as to how they were budgeted for. But 1 believe nearly everything was over phase 1 and 2 combined. Kingsford: Phase 1 involved no grant. Stiles: But that is part of the matching funds, part of their overall total budget. We are talking about money from ITD, ACRD and then what the City has actually spent on the construction. Kingsford: So Wayne was lumping those 2 projects #ogether? Stiles: That is how it was presented as a total project to the department of commerce. I would think, we have talked about this before about monies that came in that maybe weren't expected or whatever. I think there is a problem there with accounting for each dollar as far as being able to say this much has gone out and this much has gone in as far as this particular project. Because of the problems they had with the ofd Alpha Micro crashing and not having the detailed information as to what money was expended on that r~ Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 25 project. We have been able to go through and get invoices for each item that we submit to the department of commerce. But other than that 1 still am pretty much relying on an audit from Jo Bolen to help me pinpoint those costs. Tolsma: (Inaudible) and some local business people and (inaudible) inquiring about purchasing the old Intermountain Arms (inaudible). They said that they heard (inaudible) extra parking in a close proximity. They were wanting to know what the time frame was, the possibility of having that parking there. I think it was contingent somewhat on their acquisition of the building. Stiles: I think we may well be asking maybe those businesses, because it is going to be obvious they are not going to have the off street parking that is required, they are going to have to apply for a variance to participate in that. I don't know if that is a possibility or not, but you hate to see an empty building but you also hate to see people parking up and down the main street and having no where to go. Tolsma: That might be a question that maybe (inaudible) church representative was asking me today where we were on that building. They, suddenly some of the members are having thoughts about restoring the building and using it. If we are not going to do something (inaudible). Stiles: I think the need is there, it is just not being able to pinpoint everything that has gone to that project. I think the audit, I am hopeful that the audit is going to help me do that which is due any day now. Kingsford: 1 would suggest to the Council too that by the planning session on the 24th that audit doesn't bear out availability of some more monies for that project that you give some consideration to your long range plan to the city budgeting for a portion of that and working with the Nazarene church board on that because 1 think a real opportunity will be lost if that doesn't take place for the downtown area. Anything else Ron? Tolsma: No Kingsford: I remind the Councii that the department head meeting will be tomorrow at 4:00 in the conference room. Mr. Berg? It seems like we tabled everything tonight. Entertain a motion to adjourn. Yerrington: So moved Tolsma: Second Meridian City Council January 3, 1995 Page 26 Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to adjourn, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:34 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVED: G NT P. KINGS RD YOR ATTEST: WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., I CLERK • • ORIGINAL BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION LAWRENCE H. AND SHIRLEY S. CHETWOOD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SOUTHEAST OF INTERSTATE 84 & MERIDIAN ROAD MERIDIAN. IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled conditional use permit application having come on for consideration on November 9, 1994, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Planning and Zoning Commission having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant appearing through a representative, Richard Newman, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the _____ fr,~tpw;na Finr9ings_of Fact and,Conclusions of Law: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That a notice of a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for November 9, 1994, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the November 9, 1994, hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That the property is located within the City of Meridian; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 1 CHETWOOD that the general location of the property is southeast of the corner of Interstate 84 and Meridian Road and in an area classified as a Mixed/Planned Use Development Area on the Generalized Land Use Map in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and is described in the application which description is incorporated herein. 3. That the property is currently zoned C-G, General Retail and Service Commercial. 4. That the zoning of General Retail and Service Commercial, (C-G) is defined in the Zoning Ordinance at 11-2-408 B. 11. as follows: (C-G1 General Retail and Service Commercial: The purpose of the (C-G) District is to provide for commercial uses which are customarily operated entirely or almost entirely within a building; to provide for a review of the impact of proposed commercial uses which are auto and service oriented and are located in close proximity to major highway or arterial streets; to fulfill the need of travel-related services as well as retail sales for the transient and permanent motoring _- -- _ ---pnbl~c-= ~~--sr2cF-~3atriets =-shall='=be- =c®~nec-te~-moo= _ .-- Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the Gity-of Meridian, and '31Y~'1'2°"~iio~-"`it`¢te'-"strip- commercial -.development---~end__ _-. encourage clustering of commercial development; That 11-2-409 B states that a sales lot for automobiles is only allowed as a conditional use in the C-G district. 5. That the Applicant is not the owner of record of the property; that the owner of record is W. H. Moore; that the owner has not submitted a consent to this application. 6. That the property is currently undeveloped and vacant. 7. That the proposed use by the Applicant is to construct a 35,000 square foot retail automobile dealership to include service activity, general office administrative activity and retail sales; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 2 CHETWOOD that the current site is too small, cannot meet the demand. 8. That at the public hearing the Applicant's representative, Richard Newman of BP Grouping, specializing in the automobile development design and construction process, testified that because of significant growth, the current location of the dealership no longer meets the demands of the local community; that room is lacking for servicing vehicles, for displaying vehicles, for handling parts to repair and lacks accessibility. 9. Mr. Newman stated the new location has approximately 9 acres; that the site has easy access to major road systems; that it is in close proximity to a major highway; that the land will be purchased and not leased; that approximately 2.7 acres will be held in reserve for future growth for the business and that this application will be harmonious with and in accordance with the -- _ _ _ _ _ °Comprehea~ve- Pl$n __^_~ ._..:__.___--`ff. °==~fe alb=~~~~d°"E`h'at-=irr~¢t°regarding-ths -landscaping -__ requirements would like to be discussed between the developer and the City of Meridian; that some concerns about the type of landscaping specified are of concern to the developer; that because of display requirements for the vehicles, static display of large, leafy trees tend to restrict the visibility of the automobiles and also create some problems for cleanliness. 11. That there were two letters in support of the application submitted, one from Bernice Tisdale, Chairman of Economic Development Committee for the Meridian Chamber of Commerce and one FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 3 CHETWOOD from Jim Icing, Vice President and Treasurer of Western States. 12. That there was no opposing testimony to this application. 13. That sewer and water is available to the property, but the property will have to comply with the commercial sewer and water rates. 14. That the Ada County Highway District commented that a 4- foot wide concrete sidewalk was required along Bonefish Place abutting the parcel; that a standard, cul-de-sac turnaround (45- degrees) with vertical curb, gutter and 4-sidewalk at the end of Bonefish Place be constructed; that a standard commercial curb cut with a width of 30-feet shall be utilized for the access at the cul-de-sac and the other two access points. 15. That the City Planning Director commented to the landscaping and the need for 143 three-inch caliper trees required -_ =€ar-_~~il:e==pI~ •-~==€ha- ~ -~on~ing for; the andacapinq end .. athe~- --- . _..-.:_3~rr~mexxts- mav--}xe--~uc>rot~riate: that the 35-foot satbark_ along Interstate 84 shown as a leased site., will need to be landscaped and will need to comply with the Comprehensive Plan. 16. That the Assistant City Engineer commented regarding the tiling of any existing irrigation ditches crossing the property; that the sewer line falls within the 20 foot wide easement granted to the City of Meridian in July of 1990 and that no permanent structures will be allowed to be placed within said easement; that existing domestic wells and/or septic systems will have to be removed; that all off-street parking, landscaping, drainage, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 4 CHETWOOD lighting, paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in 2-414 of the City of Meridian Zoning Ordinance; that all signage shall be in accordance with standards set forth in 2-415 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. 17. That the Nampa Meridian Irrigation, City Fire Department, Ada County Highway District, and Central District Health submitted comments and they are incorporated herein as if aet forth in full. 18. That proper notice has been given as required by law and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission have been given and followed. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have ---- ' - - been-° met °°ineluding the mailing of notice to owners of property `- . = _--oriti=~rr 360-feet"-of tike-'ex~ernai- ~oundarzbs of the Applicant, s property; 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to grant conditional uses pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and, pursuant to 11-2-418 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; 3. That the Applicant shall submit the consent of the owner of record for the conditional use. 4. That the City of Meridian has authority to place conditions on a conditional use permit and the use of the property FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 5 CHETWOOD pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and pursuant to 11-2-418(D) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian, Idaho. 5. That 11-2-418(C) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian sets forth the standards under which the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council shall review applications for Conditional Use Permits; that upon a review of those requirements and a review of the facts presented and the conditions of the area, the Planning and Zoning Commission concludes as follows: a. The use, would in fact, constitute a conditional use and a conditional use permit is required by ordinance. b. The use should be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. c. The use apparently would be designed and constructed, to be harmonious in appearance with the intended character of the general vicinity. --- _ -- - - --- - ---_- --d: -Ttrat--tfze--use ~anld not be hazardous =nom = sIiou~ i - disturbing to existing or future neighboring-uses.- - - . e. The property has sewer and water service available. f. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and the use would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The use would not involve a use, activity, process, material, equipment or conditions of operation that would be detrimental to person, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic or noise. h. That sufficient parking for the property and the proposed use will be required. i. The development and uses will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 6 CHETWOOD 6. That all ordinances of the City of Meridian must be met, including but not limited to, the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Electrical Code, the Fire and Life Safety Code, all parking and landscaping requirements; that the Applicant shall meet with Shari Stiles to work out an acceptable landscape plan. APPROVAL OF FINDIN(i3 OF FACT AND The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE COMMISSIONER SHEARER -- --E(JNfMISSiUNER ALIDJANI -- ,:.-_. ~ _ , ~}HNSON (TIE:..BREAKER) VOTED VOTED VOTED -. .. VOfiE _ VOTED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 7 CHETWOOD DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. MOTION: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 8 CAETWOOD APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian City Council hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions this ~ day of ~~~2GL/.Z "~ ~ X495 COUNCILMAN MORROW COUNCILMAN YERRINGTON COUNCILMAN CORRIE COUNCILMAN TOLSMA MAYOR KINGSFORD (TIE BREAKER) (tNtTlAtj / _ _ _ t/ ~ VOTED ~~ VOTED VOTED'''` VOTED i%~ VOTED APPROVED ~ DISAPPROVED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - ~~'j Q~GrJUUCL r, ,J' ~ i ~ ~7 ', 1 . ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ^:, ORDINANCE NO. 687 rr /S AN RDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN `'~ `"REAL PROPERTY WHICA IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., ADA COUNTY, STATE OF IDAHO; AND "~ PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is described in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Counoil of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the real property described as: All that certain real property situated in Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, State of Idaho, described as follows: A portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 1, further described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap being the East one quarter corner of Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M.,; thence North 00°17'24" East, 1,724.96 feet along the East Section line, (formerly known as North, 103.43 rods) to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 89°19'43" West, 1,735.54 feet (formerly known as West, 105 rods) parallel to and 933.40 feet South of the North line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 00°07'16" West, 381.18 feet, (formerly known as South, 21.76 and 10/11 rods) parallel with and 924.00 feet East of the West line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 89°27'04" East, 1,734.40 feet (formerly known as East, 105 rods) along the North line of Lansbury Lane Subdivision, as filed in book 64, page 6499 of Plats, Ada County Records; thence North 00°17'24" East, 377.53 feet, (formerly known as North, 21.76 and 10/11 rods) along said East line of Section 1 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - GREENRAVEN ESTATES Page 1 is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned R-4 Residential; that the minimum house size built on the property shall be 1,600 square feet; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning. Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de- annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land. b. That the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted January 4, 1994. c. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and other matters. d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9-605 M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways. e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the Applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns. f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission ANNE%ATION ORDINANCE - GRSENHAVEN ESTATES Page 2 within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this ~ ~d day of January, 1995. U;r ~~"~~?>., °•~. APPROVED: .s ? ~; .~ ~ ~ "~~A ~ an~ ~ k t;~ ..~>m~a» ~ ~, :.;:,, ..~ ~~{ ~ ; In t ~~~' ;; ks¢ Y`'r« ,~~~:vfl'i-sV'~O MAYOR -- G T KIN RD a ; ,,+ ~,. ~':i1 t. :r 4Y i ~J '~ ., ATTE f~Li. ~ ~~~ ,~i~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR -- ITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., ADA COUNTY, STATE OF IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE"; passed as Ordinance No. 687, by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the „~ day of January, 1995, as the same appears in my office. DATED this 3 Fly of January, 1995. .s ~ o~ C) ~ ~ Nc~' ~~A c: ~ui,,. 7 ~ ~ 8h~ .. ANNEXATION ORDYNCFT' ~~ , '`"~ City Clerk, City of a idian Ada County, Idaho ~,~ s. ESTATES Page 3 STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) On this ~ day of January, 1995, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. / ,ve,,,~:,.> ~, SEAL '~- .~'' No a Public for daho .'~ R s' ing at Meridian, Idaho ` ~' ommission Expires ~~9 ;~ ~; .,, ~ $~~~ ANNERATION ORDINANCE - GRSENNAVBN ESTATES Page 4 l1 • ~ ~~ ORDINANCE NO. 688 ~'?~/ I j~7°"AN RDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING THE _ ZONING-QF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH IS ,Jw u~~ DlE6CRIBL}D AS THE NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, BLOCK 1 OF F.A. NOURSES 3RD ADDITION TO MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND Iet__-. PROVIDING :AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ... ~F,,,.- -~ WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to amend and change the zoning from R-15 to C-C, Community Business, for the described parcel in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the aforementioned real property which is described as follows: North 1/2 of Lot 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, Block 1 of F.A. Nourses 3rd Addition to Meridian be, and the same is rezoned from R-15 Residential to CC Community Business District, and Section 11-2-425, Official Zoning Maps is hereby amended to reflect the same. This rezoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for rezone. Section 2. The Applicant shall pave parking areas adjacent or near property, the design standards for off-street parking in 11-2-414 must be met. Section 3. That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above conditions the property shall be subject to rezone back to R-15. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, REZONE ORDINANCE - LANG Page 1 which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this ~r-`~ day of ~,/(ZGi (.ta Y-~ 199 S APPROVED: ATTEST: OR -- GRANT RI ~SFORD WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. CITY CLERK <= Grp ' ~, _ ;; ~!~ ~ ~~ `A' :. c..FS > ~ •. ~fYf °V::e.,.. ~ ~ 1 REZONE ORDINANCE - LANG Page 2 STATE OF IDAHO, County of Ada, ss. I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, BLOCK 1 OF F.A. NOURSES 3RD ADDITION TO MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE"; passed as Ordinance No.688 , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the 3r~1 day of ~C{M Oi.Q.~~ , 199.5 , as the same appears in my office. DATED 's ~rd day of <larauav~ , 199 -~' .qv wb ~ by ~ N' :.~, ::. City Clerk, City o- M idian ;~ ~ '` ~ Ada County, Idaho ,. 1 ~ a, AP y fi• a County~'.pf' ~1i3~; :r'~ On this 3rc~ day of Jammu r , 199 S , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Pu is in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. ~~~,,,~ f{p' ,~~' try b ®`^: s~ r SEAL a~ ~ t ~,;~ . rr ~,v , D11C xor laano at Meridian, Id ho n Expires• U' O=c REZONE ORDINANCE - LANG Page 3 ~ a n 2 ~~ '~ - . t' ;. ~ o~ • ~ `. ~~ ~ ,_. ~Q ~ ~ ~~ ~ „- _ ~Z ~ m D - ~ /1O - r r•t rre /ro _ n ~ _ < N e s ~/; 31C Y 1 ' ~ W ~ ~ .t' N ~ M V dit ~ T h ~ +~ b ~ ...~ u D P. ~. ~~ A 4 .~ 0 yY: x ~N.' ~. ~ w r11 ~ i Z V ~ ~ a ! ~ _ C N V ~ W O /. = c ' /t/ K /20 i se _. I `/A ~, .. e~ ~, o O =e \ fO k v . ry W 4 # A W c ro N ~~ ~ ~ ,ro o o /10 P u a W h n /re 0 W ~ N O ~' 1n a~ V V d ' w ~ y i /r. 4 ° o 0 1 /LO Ri /r0 ,t; r .E. 2ND ST. ° m ,r< ,e ,ro k ~ 4 x' V ~ V n o W ~ ie ~ - 4 a to , _ "' ~ ° ~ ~E. 3RD ST 4e V Y /IJ /~ j V p a y a b A b 1 O o W ~ C ~ ~ ~ N h to ` ° O o ~ ~ ~ h ° m ` -__-~-_ - ~-.--aTL -CT. ~.. -- 6 • w ~ M N a V Z ' ~' N ~ y A Z ~ ~ F o ~ • D ~ = ~~- r ~~ o ~ w G .reR N /s F ST. / .rc~ STREET-" ~ ~ ll ~ b~ ~~ 1 n 1 y ~ ~ ~,x,H~ ~ r 3 ~~ U ~ C' j T O D ~~ I I I .... .. I ~ aln I I ~---- 'i~ -- i ti --~ . F. ~--__--I'L-__ JI/ - I -~ I L______~ L____ ~~ __ I ' '_ II r-----7r----- i --- - - I I ,rLl9 fi r:, -'~ I I I I I I U b r-----~ 1------ I M '--- - s.ir ' ~ ,4„ --~ r- '--J V; I ~ M I ,~ Y -- I II S ~ H__-_ I ' I ~ '-tie r f ___ n!_I L ~ Yn I ~ --- ~ .e/ _ eo j'a~ ~3 J r --1 -----~ '---- _~ "- - I , N _ w' I i I I I I; 1 ____JI ___~ ` \ ~ - _~~-~ I _'1'T_ r : _~\ . a ~. •. ...y.. ...... w. • _ / ~ • ~_~: :` D m i ~ r' m r 3 ~ m ~ D < ~ ,. ~ Z~A -----a ` I ~ r ~ _ ~l - 7/f w J/6 .r. fuiR -.. /~/ J/G __ ~t V JK 'pj/ ~ttS SF~ ~ ~Fp S W ,o W ~ ~~T s / n ~ ~ v ` m .' . i o pp~T~ J/L /p/ ' 3/6 LbYl4.~ w_ //~~ Jk _ -~--~- f_. "~ ~ ~ r wA B/b .>R,R ....its 8oal. y e \ --..a.. S/-T b ~VL. j_:~~Ll is <.i/1.6. !1L `. M~:.....\ 6 w 00 LS.S cl.F /. y-F eee , is cYl. Gll -L L3lqq~~ (x! s.." W IH4 .' ,r tlc ....... ~AIt10ne w a~wAe t !~t ~ ~ t/ `. ~ ~A __. a n n v ~ ~~ a c~; • n f~: n~ n w n R c i~fi~ ` IS o ~ . '~ I I w w~ U ~ Y / ~ ''i ~ N 0 - m m I c1.5 s3. ~ ( ~ .. Y (l c3 _ If - u A~`£ .~.( n......r//f'. .50 60 /OM.....~ NO•J !. 5 .. e ~ I t w ye ~ ° fllfl 5 } ~ \ ~ x' ~/ co w P \ _ N q M ~+ 4 e ~ h e n ` p . 6F LI 60 yiff !I Ge B a ~ R ~ 14 e~_TL~T~L y~1'1:.f.._ ._.... - se- ,L yid N .... -_._ra.c ._. ...._ -_ , Of•F 9J)7 ON W D, ~N ~N~ mN N~ ,Se ~. a:r'a ;vM~ ~ :: o ry ~ b r U ~ ~ N~~~ N~ v ~ N M u~ N T w J I~l ' ~ ~ A y VI T N~ o " m w ~_ \ W BB.9l ~ ~ 94.! TI (z0 ~~ \. ~ w • b '' Y ~ ~ n ' (f~ q/ -0 -- s.e et7i! ,co954 E. 3RD ST. _ M Y ~y ~ w C ~ v W~,S. .!!e•n~"c~ 38354 ~ ~ I ( ~ ___ 1F 92 B9. bl A ~ • ~~~ I 1(: . • e ~'Qe R~ I M'+ n c ti G N 1 M P ~_~ I f I r. - n ~ ~~ ~' ~: \ ; - C ~ N W 6TH - ---- -- ~ ------ -----~ --- ~ ~ ° _ I, __ ~~ ~ ° :~ - ~ K~fuTERF -iSA~ ~~ ° O ~0 ~ ~. ~ _ ' _ ~ ~ Y %1~d7' it ;Tye- =-1 I it ,~\ ~I % i I "fit , - GS :,. , e - - ~ - -a - -------- %' ~ ~ ~ I <,. i' ;~ , ~, IQ ~,• ~ „, ~ ~ ~ a '~ ~ f ~-_` i' it I: i, I I ~ i ~ ~ l l~ ~• i ~_ - _~ N , q - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i r Y i' `~ i i i I ~ ~ ~ ,x ~~, /~ ~ :C i ~ ~' I ~ ~, i~ ~ i i/Z ~ ~ iG~i i ~ ~ _ i .. ~ ___ _ _ 21 I I I I O O~ ~ ~~ I h - I I I~ I I ~d _~ ; ______________-_ __~_ ~~ •- ° 6 ' 'a~ -; i~' ~ I '; '~, ~ ° _ n I i i „ ~ _ ~'r'j - I ~ '$, gyp; i /~ _ ~ i1~~ ~ °r : - ~ , : ---- ~~~ ;r ~ ; 'i i~% ,~ - ~ ~ r~ - ,'~ ~\~ , ;~ _ : / _ f -° l+ .,~ ,~ ~ ~_, .o'. , --, gyp, . .` :'g~ Y of C f ~ I 1 i „, ~~ Y i o I~ ~ j 1 1 ~~ 1 : ' i -%' I ~ : ' ~ Jn ~ ~ j, ~' ' j I ; i I ~ i U ' /: I` 1 I ~ 1 ~ I i ' , ' I , ,' ! i ~ / ___ ' 1 ____J N. [1 ?kE. - w t,91sF •R4' -- ---~ ~' II~II /~ _ z -' o tl ~.. 881, ~ ~ ~, "~ Q D -i ~ ~ o ~ -~-`I c~ ~ m H. N C W ~_ N O Z ~% z~ r D N m ~~ Z ~i -------- ~~ I CITY OF MERIDIAN HUB OF TREASURE VALLE :` . 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 PUBLIC MEETING SIGN-UP SHEET NAME: PHONE NUMBER: L.~~Ry__c~~T~ ~~~----------------------------------~g~-=~~03----------------- RESOLUTION # 161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IN SUPPORT OF STATE GENERAL REVENUE SHARING TO CITIES, COUNTIES, AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, the Association of Idaho Cities supports the allocation of 8% of state general revenue from income tax to cities; counties and school districts and WHEREAS, Idaho cities have only the "most hated" tax"`, the local property tax, to rely on to meet growing budget demands; and WHEREAS, Governor Phil Batt has declared property tax relief to be a high priority in his administration; THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL of the city of Meridian hereby resolves to request the Idaho Legislature provide property tax relief by supporting AIC's proposal to provide $45 million, 8% of state income tax revenues, shared equally by cities, counties,. and school districts, such that cities and counties will be required to deposit 50% of all moneys in a "property tax relief fund" and school will be allowed to use the funds only as match for their capital improvement bonds. *According to BSU survey, 1992. DATED this 3rd day of January, 1995. APPROVED: -~ MAYOR -GRANT P. IN RD ATTEST: WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., TY CLERK r OR!~!iVAL BEFORE TBE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WOLFE-WBEELER DEVELOPMENT GROUP CONDITIONAL USE PERNIT NORTB OF FAIRVIEW AVENUE BETWEEN LOCUST GROVE AND EAGLE ROADS MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled conditional use permit application having come on for consideration on November 9, 1994, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Planning and Zoning Commission having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant, Clyde Wheeler, appearing, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That a notice of a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for November 9, 1994, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the November 9, 1994, hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That the property is located within the City of Meridian; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 1 that the general location of the property is north of Fairview Avenue between Locust Grove Road and Eagle Road and south of Dove Meadows Subdivision; the property is in an area classified as a Mixed/Planned Use Development Area on the Generalized Land Use Map of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and the property is described in the application which description is incorporated herein; it is to the east of property owned by Roger Allen who has applied for, and received, approval for a shopping center and the Shoshoni Building is near the property. 3. That the property is currently zoned C-G, General Retail and Service Commercial. 4. That the zoning of General Retail and Service Commercial, (C-G) is defined in the Zoning Ordinance at 11-2-408 B. 11. as follows: (C-G) General Retail and Service Commercial: The purpose of the (C-G) District is to provide for commercial uses which are customarily operated entirely or almost entirely within a building; to provide for a review of the impact of proposed commercial uses which are auto and service oriented and are located in close proximity to major highway or arterial streets; to fulfill the need of travel-related services as well as retail sales for the transient and permanent motoring public. All such districts shall be connected to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian, and shall not constitute strip commercial development and encourage clustering of commercial development. 5. That the Applicant is not the owner of record of the property; that the owners of record are Dennis W. Hicks and Donnarae Hicks, husband and wife, and James L. Hoyd and Amiletta Boyd, husband and wife, who have consented to this application for a conditional use permit. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 2 6. That the property is currently undeveloped and vacant and has been used in the past for agricultural purposes. 7. That the proposed use by the Applicant is for an automotive dealership for a sales and service lot on approximately three acres and using the balance of the property for automotive related services such as a car wash, tire shop, auto body shop and automotive glass shop. 6. That at the public hearing the Applicant, Clyde Wheeler, testified that they wanted to know if the project fits into Meridian's plans, that he had minor problems with comments numbered 2, 3, and 4 included in the comments of Shari Stiles, Planning Director, that they will have a 20 foot planting strip, that ACRD requirements are acceptable, that they would comply with the City requirements, if they are reasonable, and that large trees are a problem because they need to be able to be viewed from Fairview Avenue. 9. That Larry Hagen testified that he wanted to know if this was a new or used car dealer and that he thinks it would be good business for Meridian. 10. Dave Leader testified that he was the owner of the subdivision to the north and his concern was that he wanted a buffer between this project and his subdivision to buffer noise, light and the visual effects of this project. 11. Don Bryan testified that his concern was noise from loud speakers since they echo, that he had battles with the ditches on FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 3 this land, and that he wants to know the status of the agreement regarding ditches and water that was proposed for this area. 12. Shari Stiles, Meridian Planning Director submitted comments which are incorporated herein by this reference; the principal provisions of her comments were that a development agreement was required, that a 35 foot set back from Fairview Avenue was required for landscaping, that development plans are to show adequate access and meet City and ACBD requirements, that the project should be redesigned to meet requirements placed on the land at annexation, that 112 three-inch caliper trees are required, buffering of adjacent residential properties must be maintained with a minimum 20-foot planting strip on the north boundary, and that light glare and noise must not impact adjacent residential properties. 13. That Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to the City Engineer submitted comments and they are incorporated herein by this reference; that his principal comments were that all irrigation ditches small be tiled, that water and sewer assessments will be determined during the building plan review, that any existing wells or septic systems shoud be removed, that all off-street parking, landscaping, drainage, lighting, paving and striping shall be in accordance with 11-2-414, and that all signage shall be in accordance with 11-2-415. 14. That the Meridian Police and Fire Departments, Central District Health Department, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 4 U. S. West, and the Ada County Highway District submitted comments which are by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full; the Ada County Highway District's site specific requirements were that a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk was required abutting the parcel and that points for proposed development shall be limited to two curb cuts, each 30-feet wide with 15-foot radii and align one of the access points with the existing driveway to the south. 15. That section 11-2-418 d. states as follows: "In approving any Conditional Use, the Commission and Council may prescribe appropriate conditions, bonds, and safeguards in conformity with this Ordinance. Violations of such conditions, bonds or safeguards, when made apart of the terms under which the Conditional Use is granted, shall be deemed a violation of the Ordinance and grounds to revoke the Conditional Use. The Commission and Council may prescribe a set time period for which a Conditional Use may be in existence." 16. In the Meridian Comprehensive Plan it is stated: MIXED-PLANNED USE DEVELOPMENT, Page 28 Mixed-use Area at Locust Grove Road and Fairview Avenue Plus Area North of Fairview Avenue. These areas are within Ada County, but nearly surrounded by the City of Meridian. The area is characterized by large rural lots, and a sparse development pattern. In order to stimulate planned development in these areas, the following policies apply: a. 5.16U All development requests will be subject to development review and conditional use permit processing to ensure neighborhood compatibility. b. 5.17U A variety of coordinated, planned and compatible land uses are desirable for this area, including low-to-high density residential, office, light industrial and commercial land uses. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 5 c. 5.18U Existing residential properties will be protected from incompatible land use development in this area. Screening and buffers will be incorporated into all development requests in this area. C. Under TRANSPORTATION, Page 43 1. Existing Conditions a. Cherry Lane/Fairview, East of Meridian Road, is listed as a principal arterial b. Locust Grove Road is listed as a Minor arterial. D. Under COMMUNITY DESIGN, at Page 70. 1. Entryway Corridors c. Fairview Avenue (East entrance). 2. Entrance Corridors Goal Statement - Promote, encourage, develop and maintain aesthetically pleasing approaches to the City of Meridian. 3. Policies, Page 73 a. 4.3U Use the Comprehensive Plan, subdivision regulations, and zoning to discourage strip development and encourage clustered, landscaped business development on entrance corridors. b. 4.4U Encourage landscaped setbacks for new development on entrance corridors. The City shall require, as a condition of development approval, landscaping along all entrance corridors. 4. Neighborhood Identity Goal Policies, Page 74 a. 6.4U Limit the conversion of predominantly residential neighborhoods to nonresidential uses, and require effective buffers and mitigation measures through conditional use permits when appropriate nonresidential uses are proposed. 17. That Avest was required to have a 35 foot landscaped setback along Fairview under 4.4U, stated above. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 6 18. That a similar conditional use was granted to L. B. Properties, on Fairview Avenue for Larry Barnes Chevrolet; that the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for that application are noted herein. 19. That proper notice has been given as required by law and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission have been given and followed. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property; 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to grant conditional uses pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and, pursuant to 11-2-418 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; 3. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan states that the property would only be capable of being developed under the conditional use permit process with design review to ensure neighborhood compatibility; therefore a conditional use is required for development of the property, which is what the Applicant has applied for in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance, which requires a conditional use for an automobile sales lot. 4. That the City of Meridian has authority to place FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 7 conditions on a conditional use permit and the use of the property pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and pursuant to 11-2-418(D) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian, Idaho. 5. That since the Meridian Comprehensive Plan states that the City shall require, as a condition of development approval, landscaping along all entrance corridors, that landscaped setbacks for new development on entrance corridors are encouraged, and since such requirement was used to require Avest to have a 35 foot set back for landscaping along Fairview Avenue, it is concluded that the Applicant shall have a 35 foot set back for landscaping. 6. That 11-2-418(C) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian sets forth the standards under which the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council shall review applications for Conditional Use Permits; that upon a review of those requirements and a review of the facts presented and the conditions of the area, the Planning and Zoning Commission concludes as follows: a. The use, would in fact, constitute a conditional use and a conditional use permit is required by Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. b. The use should be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan but the Ordinances require a conditional use permit to allow the use. c. The use, as a condition of the conditional use permit, must be designed and constructed, to be harmonious in appearance with the intended character of the general vicinity, which des the Avest property. rYtCJude s d. That the use should not be hazardous nor should it be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses if the requirements in these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 8 are met. e. The property has sewer and water service available. f. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and the use would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The use should not involve a use, activity, process, material, equipment or conditions of operation that would be detrimental to person, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic or noise, but the conditional use if granted, should be subject to annual review to assure that the uses do not violate these provisions. h. That sufficient parking for the property and the proposed use will be required. i. The development and uses will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. 6. That the comments of the City Engineer, Fire Department and the Ada County Highway District, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District and other governmental agencies must be met and complied with; that the requirements of the Meridian Planning Director, Shari Stiles, shall be met, except for the required three-inch caliper trees along Fairview Avenue; in their place along Fairview Avenue the Applicant shall place landscaping that Shari Stiles determines to be an adequate replacement, but which is low in profile to allow adequate view of the portion of the premises used for a sales lot; the trees shall be required in all areas not more than thirty (30) feet from Fairview Avenue. 7. It is further specifically concluded that it is the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance to try to promote and to protect public health, safety, comfort, convenience, prosperity and general FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 9 welfare. 8. That it is concluded that the location and layout of the proposed use on the property could pose problems with regard to noise, glare, fumes or odors for the residential properties nearby to the north; that it is concluded that it is some of the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance are to 1) promote the achievement of the proposals of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, (11-2-402 1.), 2) to protect residential, commercial, industrial and civic areas from the intrusion of incompatible uses and to provide opportunities for establishments to concentrate for efficient operation in mutually beneficial relationships to each other and to shared services, (11- 2-402 5.), 3) to encourage excellence and creativity in the design of all future developments and preserve the natural beauty of Meridian's setting, (11-2-402 8.), but, 4) it is also the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance to encourage the proper distribution and compatible integration of commercial uses into all residential areas of the City (11-2-402 11.). 9. That it is concluded that to make the proposed use harmonious and compatible to neighboring residential uses to the north, to the Avest commercial development to the east, and to the Shoshoni Building, which is in the area, the following requirements must be met, and continuously met; and these conditions should be reviewed by the City Council, amended, added to, changed or deleted as the City Council deems appropriate: a. That all construction, including remodeling, fence construction, and plantings shall be subject to Design Review FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 10 b. That the development drawing or drawings shall be subject to design review for all respects unless it conflicts with the below stated requirements and then the most restrictive requirements of the City or planned uses of the Applicant shall control. c. That the Applicant shall prepare and submit a landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by the Meridian Planning Director; it is suggested that the Applicant meet with Avest so that Applicant can meet the landscape plan adopted and approved by Avest and the City of Meridian. d. That Applicant shall landscape the perimeter of the entire parcel of property; that the landscaping along Fairview shall not exceed, or be capable of exceeding, four feet in height, but shall not be less than two feet in height; that the vegetation not along Fairview Avenue shall not be allowed to grow more than twenty feet tall, but shall be watered and fertilized to encourage as much growth as soon as possible. e. That the buildings shall be so designed that any overhead doors for the entrance and exit of vehicles shall face south; that there may be two overhead doors that face west or east but they shall be in the nature of emergency exits and not used on a daily basis. f. That any and all lighting shall directed away from any adjacent residential uses and shall be constructed such that it does not glare, or shine, on any surrounding residential property. g. That the use of external loudspeakers shall be limited to business hours, only on Monday through Friday, and shall be limited to 60 decibels measured at the property line; that the buildings shall be constructed to be as soundproof as reasonably possible. h. That there shall be no wrecked, demolished, or junk cars kept or stored on the property. i. That there shall be no offensive fumes, smoke or odor emitted from the property; that normal motor vehicle exhaust from passenger or pickup trucks shall not be deemed to be offensive; that all hazardous wastes shall be properly disposed of and shall not be maintained on the property. That the conditions stated herein, or as ultimately set by the City Council, shall be agreed to by the Applicant, in by the City of Meridian. b. That the development drawing or drawings shall be subject to design review for all respects unless it conflicts with the below stated requirements and then the most restrictive requirements of the City or of the Applicant shall control. c. That the Applicant shall prepare and submit a landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by the Meridian Planning Director; it is suggested that the Applicant meet with Avest so that Applicant can meet the landscape plan adopted and approved by Avest and the City of Meridian. d. That Applicant shall landscape the perimeter of the entire parcel of property; that the landscaping along Fairview shall not exceed, or be capable of exceeding, four feet in height, but shall not be less than two feet in height; that the vegetation not along Fairview Avenue shall not be allowed to grow more than twenty feet tall, but shall be watered and fertilized to encourage as much growth as soon as possible. e. That the buildings shall be so designed that any overhead doors for the entrance and exit of vehicles shall face south; that there may be two overhead doors that face west or east but they shall be in the nature of emergency exits and not used on a daily basis. f. That any and all lighting shall be directed away from any adjacent residential uses and shall be constructed such that it does not glare, or shine, on any surrounding residential property. g. That the use of external loudspeakers shall be limited to business hours, only on Monday through Friday, and shall be limited to 60 decibels; that the buildings shall be constructed to be as soundproof as reasonably possible. -~~-o~.,, eke Pr~pert~ !in e. h. That there shall be no wrecked, demolished, or junk cars kept or stored on the property; that all vehicles that are damaged and are required to wait for repair longer than 8 hours shall be screened from view. i. That there shall beno offensive fumes, smoke or odor emitted from the property; that normal motor vehicle exhaust from passenger or pickup trucks shall not be deemed to be offensive; that all hazardous wastes shall be properly disposed of and shall not be maintained on the property. 9. That the conditions stated herein, or as ultimately set FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 11 by the City Council, shall be agreed to by the Applicant, in writing; that if they are not so agreed to, the Application should be denied. 10. That it is stated, and concluded, for the benefit of the Applicant, those appearing at the hearing, and of all interested persons, that a conditional use under the Meridian Zoning Ordinance, in reality, is a use that is permitted in zoning districts where it is listed as a conditional use; the City may set reasonable requirements and conditions that must be met by the applicant to enable operation of the use; it is concluded that the conditions and requirements listed above are reasonable under the circumstances. 11. That all ordinances of the City of Meridian must be met, including but not limited to, the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Electrical Code, the Fire and Life Safety Code, all parking and landscaping requirements, except as noted above. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 12 APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER VOTED COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE VOTED COMMISSIONER SHEARER VOTED COMMISSIONER ALIDJANZ VOTED CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in these Findings of Fact nd Conclusions oof Law. MOTION : i`. ~-, 7 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 13 Kingsford: This ~ to inform you in wr ing, if you choose to, you. have the right to a pre-determinati~ hearing at 7:30 P. M. ni,in~5 before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and defend the claim made by the City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on .01/11/95 unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest their water, sewer and trash delinquency? No response. Kingsford: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn off list is 3.29,262.53 i,~I_L. 3. i4 L1U 1_rd ~~~l Li~.I '_' :~'-~r ~-r, T:We = 60 Da,s 1 • ~_C ..f U1r BJ:. ~ ~ -r'~'r~ `~r. re.ol ~ 1 ~ ,i~ ::~ '"iriGry Joil~~ fi.otir:*.: ,2~.r2 a iY YO a:Jn I . ... n- i - rAa~ n.i~ ..~~. __ ltlG Hiiil u~ll `u _______ "E..E @ ~ -----'-'-- ---- - kE2ii ErT :iA°E ------- -- - ---;--- :.G-:'. _,.c 2utt.; Nu.,:,E... -_ ___: -:rt(t,'T i Hn;2Ak5 i iJl _~-. . 1- 39 . DEAUDCIid I SOHlt ... I?' 3 1 c ` ;;N 2T. i ;i. =21 ....22; _. _ _ ,- 230 i CHES'ck I'AY= 1714 4TN ST. a ~ s'S.201 72.801 100.... .- ~a . HAD__. .:iISLi+3 10ti7 RwyDkiAY AV'c. ~i 22.2e1 ;4.2x1 ...~~. i- @20 WtEiw iDni .. 1481 ::;GnDidAY AVE. ~ I 35. 2Bi 77.:.5! ..., k. 1-1040 I AZEV2= I~GE EAT?k 1110 r'uL^CAD AVE. G ~c.O01 °'r.Eei .__. 1-1160 i FLRTEN iD0`;ALD .'. 132 iDAHC AVE. W ~ 25.s01 46.081 ...~~, i' SiD CL',"^ENS GLI1I'.~.~. 172"~ ;,FHG Fi r~E. ii i 22. v~,ui 4.'~EI v. _.. '.-2110 1 nARROETADE1dA IF'HYLLIS 13', IDAHO AVE. A I 22.001 44.001 65. i,0 1-:390 ~ OcANDRATG IJUi1E !!SA` =:I`uDT~Y. ST. to 55.901 62.9c1 1:;.2'3. n .. __._._ ~ 6 1-::23 ='ACi, In'Al' .64`_ f'I;;. W i 24.321 42.201 56.38' i-3400 WILL:AMS ikCSALIE 1433 PINE AVE. W i 22.0@1 49.601 7%.00: 1-35:0 . DRINEGAR iEAkL 3 };ATHLE2N 1205 r^INE AVE. W 1 48.401 91.601 :41.U2 :-x528 i FUHRMAN 1KEivT 18s0 2tiD 5T. W i 22.x01 185.381 cF7.3a1 i=559 @GRYE IHAil:~f D. 152. iSERIDIAN ST. i 35.201 77.621 _..,._. 1-s600 i FAtkAND iSHEL,_IE 1411 t'ci:IDi6N D. . c5.38i `1.x81 _.: _, 1-4100 i r"niS:OE :HAROLi, i64c FRA6;tLI:v' kD. ~ I iO.C'11 30.001 is.1"c. 2- 110 SANTISTEVAIt iDAVI3 1230 PINE A4'E. 'd I 22.0@1 36.501 53.29''. 2- 120 I DUNN IkHONDA 1921 3kD ST. U 1 28.601 55.00. 83.50 402 LUrACXY iANDREiI R DANITA 1912 7TN AVE. NW 25.301 91.001 1:7.'.'. 2- 470 1 7 3 O CCNSTRUCTICN 1643 APPLEGATE 5T. W i 22.031 58.001 80.82: 520 i 11055: iDAViD L. 11032 5TH d I .5:.201 130.801 1x5.22; - 655 `.'DUNG inC..-.N ,. ,105 iuTH .,:. 'd :._."x21 5?.?.Oi ',._.~ 2-1250 I GRAU IDiLL i@20 LINDEk RD. N I 65.001 230.001 295.02' 2-:250 I IdEAKLEY IELIZADETN 11528 1ST ST. U i 28.691 66.201 ?4.8~: 2-1462 STCfiY iDAVE:d L. ;151s' 1ST ST. W I 38.581 54.601 193.:x''. 2-1420 I AU%IER IkA;+D'( 3 DIANIi% li4:S 15T ST. U i 4L80i 1i .891 ....o=: c-i578 i LCCti ItIICHAEL 11410 24D W f 45.101 100.201 145.5.3; 2-:019 I DESILET IDENICE 12;02 2ND W ~ 41.801 49.@01 9:.x01 2-1598 1 NASN IE. RALitii 116:6 2ND "sT. W I 22.001 74.001 90.39: 2-1870 1 Pir2R :LAkr^,'f 130E "APLE AVE. W i 28.601 64.401 ;3.32; 2-'890 I DEJiTT ITHEnESA 1324 "AF'LE AVE. W 1 25.-s01 70.4@I 95.71. 2-1960 I DICt;50N IDONALD 11. 1233 MAPLE AVE. W I 2@.601 62.201 ?8.881 24970 i LfiR"a0N fI:EkRY L. 1225 7APLE W I 41.@01 96.381 '_38.:81 2-1996 I NE'BE;;kY iftiCHAftD !1337 2ND U I 31.901 72.401 ;04.;;1;! 2-2070 I MCFADDEN iAkTHUR L. .316 CAMELLIA W I 22.001 83.601 105.50: -- 8 i IiALDaIN SHAwit c. FiXIE '='17 5A"ELLI': 2@.00; 57.201 _c.- . "1-:0 i 9LAik IUILF;A ;12s'9 2ND d I 23.60: 48.301 76.521 2 :168 i O'DELL (CLAY 1224 :;:Er^,P.Y AVE. 1 25.301 51.601 70."0•. 2-2180 ! SHEPRRD 1DUWAII{ 1238 CHERRY AVE. I 48.401 142.201 190.02. 2-2328 I MCFARLRND ikL'SSELL L. _. 11217 1ST ST. W . I 48.401 172.201 220.00. 2-2418: Pil§itSTuN ISCGT7 1304 kAE;iI;iGTGt-0 AIiE. '; 22.90; 6@.40: 96.== 2-2430 1 BAkR"uSD iMANUAL 1313 CHERRY A'vE. 22.001 60.@01 32.:1: Rcoi:-Meter q: ~~ r~oat; ~ t'IET'cF't C7F211EIi Minimum Dollar Amount: 18.00 1-iB to -nbc. DCC1~ i I ------- .'-AST DUE AMOUNTS - -------- i'.E: E.^, 5 ------------- nESIDEfiT :r :XE ------------------- i----- SEk'VICE STREET ADDRESS -----I :OkREN~ ~ AkkEAkS T3 T 4L. ---------- _ =, 58 ------------------------------- %A'~; ----------------------- ':2L ------------- it c3 4TH ST. d --- - --------- „_.=?i c_.3@i _...__ 2-039 F"vUSiG't7 TG;Y 8 T'r'ERES;, :6s5 CHEI<'kY LN. J ~ 28.621 68.c0i 97.-= = a;,i . 'JAidT:IES k. w. 1624 CARLTCN AVE. 'W ! -~. 9. .991 _..-_ 357? 1 D.:. 'sTAtiLE" 11122 4TH ST. W 33.501 236.001 _: .:~. .-~6E3 i HUTCFiIiSS IwI~ IAM 130`3 IASHINGTON AVE. W 41.?! 52.601 ?4.;i. 6-:.64a 1 Cr;BDLE, iCAkOL:NE 1127 WASHINGTC;4 i:'E. 'J I i 46.081 46.2. . ~ i _.. ~GAn :Cis.. _. i162C MEk:D;H ST. ~..:.a, v4.zc -. __ SOC'-. ,'A;D n CAkOLYN 11121 MEkIDIAN ST. I 22.001 57.801 '9.u?'. .-..,:. T'r,oMS::, :L2kCY 11294 8TH W 21.391 61.321 _-.._ .-!2tiC S:iAr'FEi: iDAUI% 11208 12TH AUE. W I 45.181 79.x01 ._..-- L-i3__ FIi?~~EYEk !THCf;AS A. 11231 EL;f COURT I 2:.001 64.8€1 e`.~: „ -~,~2 : .,~..,,, .~:~,.~ .,.,^~ IM.~,.~L S. Cr 11224 NORTHGATE i 51.781 78.401 :33.1z =-5._. . ,li;C~iiT .,,.~:"'! I1s2 1sTH A'VE. « ~ 55.:Ci 72. i2i ..-. .: -4712 ! :tC2E iDEi.1~iA 11316 14TH 5.. W i 45.1?I 132.C8~ :47.;? _~v4e i _~,r i1Li'~_.~:~ .,,.C,, i_ y ~ {1406 Ti ".T. ui i - ` ..: a~G.:u'i - _.,4.__: 2-475? I ELI{'r; ;DAVI_ 11414 14TH ST. W I I L 48.;01 I L9.801 :9.C''. =E9;? ~ HCLL .__ iSHAtRCN _ 11537 15TH 5T. W I 2&.681 48.201 ..~_. r_~:~ EA':.c~ iGEGk•"vE 11536 CINDER RD. 4 2~.3 71.401 :..-:. c-5812 JOkES ."siRi:A 11535 NOkiHGATE AUE. i 41.801 33.331 ..c..~. __ ., .._~_ ::A^6.` .. 11:2 NORT„uATt' +-~i2. ~ ~..=9i :aa.u01 _ ._:. _ =1C2 'i M?'+: iii'c".ELL 11433 14TH ST. W ! ;1.341 6?.221 ::1.??. ::.'2 iiCEFiI_'d'cZ 1JIL_ 11401 14TH ST. W =::1,E,01 66.521 __~.:~. ?-533? i tiEi";Y 1'iA'JII ;. 11515 ELM PLACE 2"e.03! 43.801 5.~?: -".:"~ : 'i:f::EZ =!;EkkI 11434 ELM PLACE 25.301 98.601 :2C.,_. _-5618 A'iC:U!ETA i:ikIS iG~KINS/GAY LEE 11504 WASHINGTON ST. N ~ 35.291 72.8x1 :?c.c~: u ' ,.-,.IY,EF. 130UOLA5 I1s39 CARL''CN RVE. W ~ c2.2Bi 72.881 '","s.i;i c-537„ u'ALLI .E„~ iCGli_rETA 1143E CAkLTOH 5T. U 1 29.621 _7-.101 c2?..?! _-.?50 ' _;'I'sL=k E SAiNES 8 k 11104 WASHINGTON ~L. f 3i.?01 65.201 .,.__ .-6E30 : :;kASCS:_ .TCM 11017 12TH AV'E.". 29.681 54.631 ?~~ c53C~~ ~ 3L'ICLIii~;E.". I"LE;; 1123 8TH W ~8.c61 >6.301 ._ .as -67:? i ~ME;;ICAt; Pk'Gr'cR:°. :a,'~.AGE.".E.':' 11145 STATE 5T. J I 35.201 187.001 ?2c.:l w S4 : -IsRER ikiCK 1705 ADERNATH'( 'WY. H I 45.101 34.801 :=?.?' ;.- 63 .: 5nU~Tia _2SLIE 11368 SLATOH Dk. W 5.`.101 1G4.60! i43.?21 L _ 3 C ~;:~ 1885 TALL r'IiIE AL. H i 160.291 162. ca! _- s94 I ;i-nGME5 CORP. 1857 TALL PINE F'L. N I 22.001 126.201 14:;.2:' ," 1860 TALL ?INE PL. N I 2:.'301 227.401 _'-, C! -_e93 :' MCD.,,!:L: ` ~T1~11~ ~ TRUDY 12629 LEkOY Ci. W I 23.6x1 56.001 94.68: cti ' 't'C", ri•~'. 1255s SHtkYI ST. ': iJ..'. 95. G3! .ea.? 4-_773 -HITsADE;'L: ;rIAN 11368 STUCKEk AUE. N 28.6x1 282.401 201.221 , ..~~ .._..o .:n~;R.L.:. 11533 TCKA't R'i. :, ~...:. ._~.9si :88..=, ,-„` A ,.;._Es ;OtiSTcCT.CH 11319 SANTA ROSH VE. N i ,..?01 ~.i= .Ilti':_ ... ~'A'ii. i:BBa SANTA :LARA Iv. 'J i °~.+~. 52. "'_': '6...- -_[_'? PRISGE IkC3Er '; OAN 11516 VINEYARD"s AVE. N :2.331 1E3.33i ~..~_. ' '" c,.~. L:E .wAN ., ...CFiAEL 11532 9INE1'ARDS ;,"t. N 35.cu1 108.201 ...v. _. :- °` "C. ;; ?' ':kY%Fi W ~ 13964 ASPEN CREEK CT [5.29. 46.x51 E1.:5! , , . 5 ,~~ ?ia","6:- LE.: 11437 ,~IRROk CREE; :3Y. N ~ ~..9Bi 8;.281 ._..-_. .:- .:AF. 1,~si: Is'8a7 HAk:Ck 2D;ri Dk. ! 3 :.. L~.S3i ..__. , „i ._. .4~_:E. ._ ub - ; il . -il~ ,iGi r " :Lsl'::~ :r._. .vL :,..L. ,.,. nw:, i1_., ', ; ___.._ ___ _____ .-G _ __ __ .~~.....' :H ._ _________ _ ___ ____ ____ _ .ErtJr _ _ ..C :.Iru_ ,. ----- .wu'_uu ? .. ..:._.r ', .. nr.aL{f:16 i .. _'C_. __ ~.. w __ ______ n_. __d _________ __ J~w_._ _. .,._. a .,v. null u.. .. _., __. .. .v_. __. __ 26- + nR?L:' : , k ' E;IDY „E:, rLII,,,CE ,T. l1 : _J.CI 23.ua. _--. - ~~ _., » ~~ } _HAnuo .;C4 ;dHITE A3N -R. 4! ~C? o2i ,.?.c`~Ui ;' __- 1 1 __._ k:S.J :{.yiiE ~~{il.IC . ruw.`. ~Y:LO aT• A : ..r.. 11v..:L1 L}.:_. =c- -,_..,c., ..`il~. ... .~.,., ,;t:r, HILLS "vr^.... ,....;,. , .,,,;. :. .._.._ GC' ~ .~: ;DANA ::?E~i r r.:-..~ .:.y ur,L;,u.~Ln xH, ... 7i. ~:~: ° i'nJ. Deli .-. ,.. u ? C5E i3E59 UCOD"CN? ER '. ._ 1~9.e3i .,~.__. ,,,-:_~? _ „~ n u\ . __ .. _-1 QC f\_v=~~.1t11 I'.lv 1 L~4 1 " J ' ''I _ nLF ;' ' :C A^1 ~3~~ -C •LnLO~:: Wi. . _/~]: `. .M, C'L{' __. _v.. i: I . A . _ _ .(. _. --1u.3 . .JU...E ,D?:'c _'. _. ,.:T. :~1~E..LGC.,E:i aAY ... _.. .,... eE: --._. - 3 ~~: GDS ',21 ,. ":di; CREE .~_. "I ,:.L• _-. __. ~~ ,Il..,... . . _. - :c rini n ri ~iE ~ 4;AY : ., ~.: c :_. __ .._. ~ _ v.... ._ .. _ ,AVI7 I$o'~ {kISTE': ;:AY = 4C: r.E.[' _. _: Ri- ~3 ..r _ . : _ . _ L_- h kYi,~_. .t~ir. .''~L `~:mf din-` __. __, :rQ. ._: .__. __. - ^Gi+E:' " L ';I : clh9 kf;N GA1' ._:. 3:.cil ....:: _, ti . . . .. .. . ,.. c.' .1v ~.di1RLL. ~ ._..iiJ .\ .:v..., .n .. L. i_DI`c.SimiL ~~. w _. _. ....c3 _._. __. __' 1 --.1''Ini :e\'cDL~ _ ... _ .G.J '.u~ .JA° }, ~ __ _. ._',I _...__. ~.' _ ,r.~Y iiiEi:nL:. ,C4&1 'n7EnG DR. vi ....., E~.oal ._.._. - SEE:; D Y7SNtaE :?q 7AkIeF~tA f .?8 6n._.,. _.,,._:. .. l a ; , . _. ., c.- .n EDEn=L`'i D:~,:_ . . ~[,,,.., :LC~..~A GA~ i .... ,.c.:di ,.-- ~.- o . .:~l:E:-. .u~;, ~L=~ CIS„ 'vkiCi: ..,,..~i :8..3i .~..c~ .. ~ EAktIHA= G:.hT^e ,~~sa TY DrraE _ ._ ~..~. ~..._. .- Q . , , ,_. . . vri I,r, 1. rv rr i ;kli '~::~ uhi' E ' ,..,. r .9. v~ .~~. __- .ri_u .~ . . . _ _ l_- klv~ iH:iIUJ :+Il1~t:L 11'i,ai V:+r r,Vl• .. : _v. __i _.. _~'J~'i .~:. __. ?S- ., CG7L':E SEFFnY a ''n"ELn ,d31i, 'SRN Si. 'J :..991 G°,.c21 ??.:_. -_u„_ rriz<nA;; iD6Y.iE:. .:.,trDi .295' r,_trr.i;iE C.. __._,, :Q.:~' ---'-- u _ °i i iii~(,r a~i il:...ifL. .. .~'i Li~Dlf v.'119 .. _..,,. ~I. .~ ... ..: .,..,,, ;,..., . r I ii 8e41 ]G :CL. ., a-_~iv 'L: . _ v hlc._: .JV Lu\ ul\ ~i, ., i .. ,._. v . _ -.- t7 bF.ur?., ,~ci_t _ eC:I;Y 12931 ....,.;E:-;.", _,. ` _:. 3?~.~31 ~SZ~: ' " i " ALCC EG3Y IcE?8 1•IELDSTREA1 DR ' I i 54 52: 1; ;.'. ..- r ,:r ;mod . . ..: . _, . _a . ~ _v VL_.,i:. _.__.Y,.. ~1 ,,,r iv.'Y1iG NL_,; nln'; _r. ... v._~ ~L..:~i - _.e •.._ _-- ?CL a-:'D SC•NAL"s ;2:37 };~~ISIi ~~_. W i.5ni 135.42!. _cJ.:e. A L dAY K. '~1 Y9J. _ _~ 7.. .,LO.. c.. .LH„ ..:.• ,.,, „ •._. __ +.r.i u. _r; _i __ _ _ .. ___.._. _~ _.v m:.E4E _C. ._- u:~DL ..:°. ..dE~.. 'L. !{ .__, (2. ': v. ~~~~ Ii'~L..:i:F•Ii:TUEa•IC'i LIciT - E~CICJI< R I'IG 7Li: OF2UEIZ 4aiis.gaency Tire = 50 Cays :' ;linimun Doliar Amount: 10.00 Hoot:-Mete r 0: 1-10 tm ii. fl3~.~ ~ - }AGE: - .,L.^„ ., .;, ~- .,. ------ RAa: ~~., w ^., ,,.E „r,GU,~„ --------- i',E?EF: n 1 ------- ------- 6ESJ6%'riT :;K7E I----- SERVICE 5?REE? ADDRESS i CUkkEHT 1 Ak.EAkS I TGT :.' '2-_:,,, µILL. °. iaGChE' 11389 MONACC WAY i an..:al 1..401 :53."I 22-1356 ,,Ek..S n i iMFriVN L. I1>83 HENDRICKS CT. I .,.001 . ~ ,:0.101 -- - __~.,_. _-:388 i SCIiAEffEk 1"ICHAEL !1333 SANDALWOOD DR. W i 55,001 136.801 .:_.__ :2-1=:04 1 fJLEkS"u1i !EkIC L 11816 MCOLINCHEY ST. W i 28.081 58.581 37.2'; _~ :4~= i `?[LEES JCSE::~i 11749 HEHDkICKS ST. W i 41.901 ?3,001 :C5,=G1 22-:400 1 2NELDN IMARCL'S 11710 HEHDkICKS ST. W I :5.;:01 84.00! 1:°.=. :~ ._~. -:~rSGi '.:'iDY L. 11704 SAHDALc{COD Dk. 39.~Gi 79.c0i ...c:. ' ~~ ,~~:. ~ F'iEkCE 'EDWIN L 11395 KiNGSW00D CT. I 31.901 72.381 '84. ' ~~ .T50 ,.~_SE KU;Q 11980 TANA CT. 22.801 s3 501 3i. := 2c :xl=: 1 ~=OHEk iDO;wALD H. 11750 bEARDON CT. 1 35.20: 5x.501 91.80. 31- 1B FADC5CK iL:iIA L. 11131 CHERRY tH. W i 94.8fl1 82.901 ,,,.._ ,.,- 142 i ':Ari"uc'vE 'Ek ~MAkY 11338 Y05T CT. W 2x.001 55,201 33.2= u.- .~E 3.Aki; ::.;~ ES S Y,AREN 11310 RADIAL C?. W i 04.901 i14.0e1 _.,,.:_. 3.- :_., ?ciHE?i ifkEi 3 DEEGzAH ii%5 ;2TH ST. NW 39.501 66.001 :04.54! _.- .ESa:`IS ,nJSOEL:.. 11528 CIiERRY LN. 'J 'x5.201 .50; :11.-~. u:- 487 . '1C':,iLL EiMUND IIEBI SANDALWOOD DR. I :17.781 105.001 .e3.'2 3i- 438 1 :;SILL !ED"UND 11457 SANDLEWOOD DR. d8.00i i1d.00i __...__~ 31- 7?" i bE,RiC ~KATHARINE 11332 NEWFOkT Dk. 28.x01 62.501 X1.20: 31- -ea r'Aks ...?NAL.. 12207 FAIRWOOD Dk. I 25.301 01.201 37..=, 31- '_:: 3::EHE IELWCCD 11521 'ANA Dk. 31.901 75.33; iv7.7z1 a1- -~} i;Ak; .~i;I.:P 1150? TANA DR. ,..,.Gi :,.2! ,_. __. .,-'7 1 ~AkA~IC IDANiEI 12207 15TH SI. NW ! 38.581 32.xG1 i31.1z: ~.- ~?4 i SYITH IkGSEit 11324 FAIkWOCD DR. ~ 22.'uBl 47.;01 6^-._~1 :..- ~_.. YE:;FE IkESE D. 12101 12TH ST. HW I 59.201 P.9.901 177.1ai - °',' "' ""' ,iR. iT'c~ 1221? 12TH ST. NW i -_.804 77.401 119. c9 .,- ?~~ 1 LA$kANDO iDARLENE 11228 DELMAR DR. i 22.201 5s. 201 75.281 __-,....c rc3AP: .~NL 11481 DARRAH CR. 51.7@1 32,601 ..3C: ,.. 1324 1 -~Gi;E IiiER?CN 11341 DAkkAH DR. I 28.x0': 75.821 .0-.40 31-E1~4 1 3LA~"t:, iP,A"viP 11281 DARRAH Dk. 31.781 73.381 :u;.''=: '1-: ,. "G'FISAN ibfiE~T S .EAN '1232 DAkkAH DRI4E 28.:01 3..001 80.201 'i-_274 ;ALLiSGh IJAr".ES & C'.AkbAkA 12062 12TH ST. U i 55.[01 52.401 :i7.=Gi ,,.-_230 ~ rxk:;ONS IIINDA 12635 13TH ST. NW I 35.201 71.7:1 1@6.321 31-2233 i itieFS 2AkY, 11310 DARRAH DR. 38.c01 7L 801 lifl.3^! Ci-223.1 ~"ITC'r.SEfi !iliak't;iL'f 11464 OAP,RAH Dk. 24.001 60.281 „9.381 .. 2252 ! iiCL:`;A IRGOEfiT 11434 DARRAH DR. 41.x'01 91.601 i22.~1 ~.-2274 41IG TAMS if AYE 11312 CLAIRE ST. i 34.:01 54.[01 9x.=' 31-2332 1~IiiG %G9ERT JJDY 12249 LIHDER RD. H I 59.301 :..701 138.~a! sI-321;0 : WITT ~.-_- ~_ 1 ......., :.-32r~ _~."N~ WHIT; 31-....;4 i ~]iSL'. .. _.G to ..~J'v~l !DAV;.' i5'tE'r'HEN M. . :V iJ _. 1?IAT;iY iROD : I:CYSTEt;E IFHILC6' (. CANiLL _. .1;L::1 1350 CHATEAU Ik. W 12323 11TH AVE. HW 12095 11TH AVE. 11U 11061 NEWF'OkT CT. W :884 DELMAR DR. I1C80 DELMAR DR. i2 c2 11TH ALE. NW .lE:e FAI^nWGOD 3T. J9. ~Z1 41.901 41.881 0o vCi 45. i6! 22.3.1 2.3.501 .,.?0i 2E.3B1 ?9.501 86.461 :fl2. 381 58.40: ci7.201 36, aB 1 72.801 36.0@1 x4,801 .27.23; .28.22 i 14 i. re ?7. s9! .72..01 58.2i<1 1::.331 193.';'2: 90.12, ; ...i Tai _r .......i. ,_..:il'a ~. ~ r , v T r. •:. .:D6Y-YF~F' 8: ca ~lui iJ IitCICY: F fICT[CI: OF'iI'c:fi Yirimu: _,...,. .,vcuz.~: :2.10 1-1D t0 .._.. ~ , ._,yr,.,.~_ „ iiE",.n Y : --------------- `m - -- ----- :.t:~:It.t rtE: ti:;F,o~: ----- ..Gnrcc.vT i FRkEARS i i.T ii_. ---- .. _ _~ ---- - -- - :i LL~f~: -------- -- - ------------ ~~~ ------- -- CT t .:C35 FAa.~.r_-i ' _ `i. 5. .. ' _ .;1. Ji ~ .+~._ 31-343§ I niw tkn.u, n iGnkY rrr nr.•. - 142 'r.,F,.uLU :r. 11 LL. ]2i r ,,8.881 - L..-_ .ii-05St b.LLL: IKY-c1 6 ~22b2 i1Tfl ItVI• ..w : __.ll Y§. x'31 ... __. 31-3459 I !10PKi!-: IDAfiRl'L 12'248 3T:i ~L. ?;d §LC~B. §9.50. 3:.-=: 31-3504 ,~}", FA,...~:, ali;~ i:64s :.. 'h A'.'E. '';J .5'31 ;4.CD1 co.:C ...',..2b 1 TEA1L. Iv"nC'r, i13s :iTH M~~t. ~t~ 4'l.:;lii 8::. t2. .~..._. ,:. 54:, C~J,Dc":." w.... ui fi. ~EL:a 8i ; S-. C9 c........ ~c.,.. .-.-: ~~' 590 ~ r"C~ufE rt?Ii:F i2:L1 :,LNMEkE .,... i „3.~aI 94.s5i ...... ,..- 54J , 'ALiN ~kiCIlAkD IGI3 LAktJD~LE ;k. ~ 3&.~0! "1.C01 11.:_ ::@- 566 I HiCCE I.AkAkA J. 11319 CfiESTI"CtIT :k. 41.801 112. b0! "-.::. -] ]. 5$E r •-envy rAtluu~~. .nq ILI'r;~n ~. ~rr+ 1~ 117:7 C cor7C,T ;)k. 6o.C~CI L iva 13 .wr - _._.L_. 32- b30 ~ GAkD}tE:i !UI't+CEnT k0?3 „"EST'ICMT 'ck. cP.'d3; 103.401 ..:.-:. :~ t . ,nrr ,.., ,:;:ES,i is51 wu~~LwBkc:;r, vk. w ~ ?:.~~~ .r1.5Ui ..:.._ :,_- ..C:, ~ cEJi!:.,TCti IH. LABCC .§67 C2P,il~EF, DR. 38.5'[,' 59.;;0; :Oi.:L ,_- 73'2 uUERAY IGIE:;I nr-. ~ _: wILLCwinCCit uk. U 2.u'u'I 44.^.31 -- __._- 32- , zE ISEG-,. 1517 wi .C".BkCCY ilk. . ~c.231 58.50, .:. _ 32- 87E AECKEfi IF:CGcR '. 1671 TIFFANY PR. 78.:0: ll§.501 .:_. _ E0 i LiBniitn +b1.L L. ~~~, TIFr AnI 5(, i .~.:.~i 59.20, :J_"- i2- 90§ flr:"P~7C`i IJE.::r 12410 KE:~E''' :L. 9 r ~..ezi 51.E-;i _-•-- .~ . :- :.,, . , r_,..;.-,,. I`^3 CBk"FIEL_ n. '.' L :..: 78.x01 - -- 32':15~ ' nnnr SICFA,.L-,,.N >•q, ikt,aE5~AY ~Z r. 61 ~~.ki~Fi.~d fi. ~ 6 gin' 8...~; S- qr .,u.,.,r ~ .__. _ iEE3 ~ ' r;EL3CG r' i~"t-.... :J%rh :i ~_ n.~~n ~ E 5~~ fir, N~ i42,.:A7 R' kY n. _Sr ,.;a0; - __._ r ,.' 10 . rw r :iC :ES7;Ail ,.AF'c I ,7., Cnrr r r d5 rlai>iI.6i AJE. E ~ rr - .}jb.i;ii 5 -q 68 .rc. _.~~.-,_. ~~ `_6 : TEL-SA.:, ItSC. ~ .220 FAIk9IEw A'JE. E 72.501 166.80. 2.:=. 33- :42 h;iSSi4EEk II~r. 1:99E ~EI~IAN z;D. S 91.9c1 J3$.od: 126.90 2§- .~ .;Anv ;t' ,SET.. . ,.:. .145' f.;_4,,...:,JE. _ ~ ,..:~ i2; .~0i _:.:.:. ,. - 342 i uAfiC ikGHALD n THEkEC_ 11686 JEkIC;iC 51.701 06.00{ _.".-_ 34- .~L FATTEr6:~5`1 L^~JLA 11:55 Ci1ATEU 7k. 22.001 33.:31 5:.-_. ..- X04 u .F:IC....^,N iSCNALD 1ea96 ~aFFNIRE FL ti I c9.601 ~7.4'i ec.03' . .__ :4- °.c _..- ._.._ .._ FCSTEF; iiri6'I'_'! il. I. !21:0 AtlETH15T rL. 4 ! 38.~0i 93.80. :3:.[.c'. 4- c:_ ELLIS iTC~D uAhiA 12323 i;.".ETnYET A6'E. v ,,.c~i 46.501 5:.91 ;§- 918.1 E'3AF,u3 iCALvid ;1223 rclT2F: -K.: I 4a.48: 100.C0i :48.01 34-_''~ NC.^F'E~: D=t1 15~~ ;,4ATEAU ;)k.. 1 'x5.:01 7b.E0i L'.?n: J4'i.i92 ~ YACH iA}iI r 12167 .EffiC1J »~. ~ L_. JLi :4i.§01 _5'1. v. 34-1 .,. . .._._. "I:U.~.. r. 1207 .CT d'c. ilE ~ ...~~ '~ ,.V.:l. n' -_ L'v.: ~§-1844 ~ :LFFA'T ;STEt;iEti .2E9 }{ .,". NE ~ '4.801 ill.40i I~S.c.. 34- 5 :ui:REi: run~`+2 :1311 .~A°fOi:R:'= Ik. C.!'I 110.821 .:. ... 34-.EbO ~ JOni;ETCh: SBAt:;:3N .'E2 _:.n.K "i. '! 3.C'_i bl.>01 ._~. 34-..;a8 . "f;fi:i" „id~I'Y .. .213. _a". = . [v i ,,..8. 122.201 '~".:._, - r .. J _ - ~rCCkt rn~:~~+ _ .._.. :~i2'i _LLuArt~'J• ..,. ~ ~ «uYl :v. 4Di _. •'. _.- "r~ ~ .AC:tLI-, Ak,C .10c" _..6u:_ „T. .`,.c0! 94.481 :c .:.0 3•i .etc ..u: ..aCy ,,:.. ,..c. E:,Y~ 9'.=. ..;•_-i 111.021 _....`. 34- .r. .:,. .GL... ...: ._~id_ ,r.:. .. °3.001 _._. __. Gf:'L.la•ICTLIE_hiCY l_7:S?T - Deli::ya~.;:y aC2 = 58 Days / 8cck-"leter N: IiUDI: & hIE~TE_ft URDE.ii rinimum Dollar Rmour.t: 10.20 1-10 to nnpp ;„~,. I ------- PAST - DUc ArDUNiS -------- "'TE: !; .... '- SE°"- r ------------------- , J..- ;rACE ---------------- i----- SERVICE STREET ADDRESS -----i --- CUkRENT i Ak"EARS i TDT AL. a4-2140 ! STOEG'c6 IJC:-HATIaf; P. 11811 JEr,I~HO rtD. I 3I. ^-0. 57.44; ~59.,: 34-2554 I "a~rvnak I~:~A 8 TRRCY 11318 STCRNY Dk. E I 2a.50i 98.801 .c,.. 42-1990 i _ P'_TTEnSDH I IJa11ES I I 12215 MEADOWROSE PL. N I 38.EQI 2^x0.421 328..`' 42-2009: /lECiHE'r. .LYNN D i222O l7EADCWROSE Pl. H . 25.501 57.C01 55.5 42-2033. CO?IFCRT :DE iD"ES I 12305 CHATEAU Dk. E 2:.301 ~.7di ,... 2-.5.8 i 'r,O'sE iSD::.,, ,'1 i4 LGC'rxEADD: CT. E 45.:2: 1D0.30i :4.. 42-25a2 i CHAPraH ILCkkI ;2542 7ERDOWGL'cN PL. H I 38.=3i 57.5Oi :~._ ,~-c7 ?O i RL~Ik '(E!iJ'ri 11543 I!ERDOWGRRSS ~,. E i .2.3'1 63.;1 .~., 42-2764 i a1~NI5 IPA7ELa 11822 71ERDOWGkASS ST. E I 38.501 65.00; :04.: „~- 38 i oaRkETT iPATSY 1934 5TH ST. E I 31.:0! 53.601 ~~.: 53- 2C8 i LAGVCH iPII~E 133a STATE AVE. ~ 82 Y I 6L 501 142.891 1+. CU- .:3 ~ C~"iuCB ":;.. 1338 STATE AVE. E-DI 3 i 45.1Oi 65.4~3i .:,_.. 53- 2.. IC'rakDSCN iDRUID :i. 1330 STATE RVE. E I 31.901 48.001 79.9 50- c'26 ! ~CL'~ IJ.~"ES 1234 STATE AVE. 'c ~ 235 I 50.:'3. 135.201 15"._ :'- 673. .DOVER IL..;, :!. 11318 4TH ST. 'c i 22.041 44.O0i ~,..: 52- 69o i HOCVEF; IL'"ND Y~ 113c0 4TH E I 95.:;01 170.001 c~5. CP, c6 I C.F.I. i1~VEST",EfxTS I 1364 EIASHINGTCN AVE. E ! 2P.Dd! 44.OC1 66.5 :C-.020 i TEi.C :;;JESTIlEiiTS ~ I's01 GkUBER 't i 3B.5Oi I c.501 111.1 _.- 35O I iil',SCN iOAk'' 11302 1ST ST. E 25.,.2: 71.35. 95.;. ;•2-1520 I WDDDwARD ITE:iRY 1153.`, 1ST ST. E-CFFICE I 9s. BO; 148.501 241.8 5d-1775 CHERRY (CECIL 11608 i1ERIDIAN ST. ! 35.201 66.201 1D1.= 50-3734 i 'o7akhEC;;I (CHERYL 1907 ARLSTIN FL. N I 31.901 68.801 _Z0.7 ti-4414 i JOHNSON IDELERT k. 11018 STONEHENGE WY. H ??.90; 10.65; Ii4. C0-4482 i "EYER iJOHNHY c HELEN 1525 PINE AVE. E I 48.;41 83.401 137.2 au 45Oc JACCFSON ;nET~? s. 1406 PINE AVE. E I c2.4di 45. dGi J, .~ 5d-4534. LEE iBER^.' 1909 4TH ST. E I 25.301 64.801 90.1 5-4582 I BaF;RIE:UA IC~kOLE 1914 2ND ST. E i 52.T. 119.501 170._ 56-4.`,93 ATE:I;iSCH kaY 1124 PINE AVE. E 167.281 83.4&I ~-:'.. 53-4602 I ESC(iYV iRICHAkD 1116 PIkE AVE. E 1 I 41.801 33.301 75.6 :..- .20 ?RcILE.. ':"sE ' I i•._ 1614 iS`i ST. E i 59.;101 371.151 460.4 C1- 302.. Si,"c3"uR;Y ISHaeaY 1420 'r•ROADWRY AVE. E i 25.34( 60.801 86.1 5:- 059 I "CF?CDENS i 1707 2ND ST. E 16.OAi 32.401 48.0 51- 446 127 GLUD I 1127 IDAHO RVE. E I 257.101 441.701 558.8 `.1- 45O I „UF.Ri'S c ECTRCfIICS I 1131 IDAHO AVE. E 1 79.241 135.30; 214.5 EI- 486 . 'r',EE12 iRaTHEkIHE 1325 IDAHO RVE. E 33.~Oi 16.:0! 115.3 -.1- 573 '. HDO'JEk iL~HD ;534 IDAHO AVE. 'c i 22.D?I 4&.641 54.5 51- 774 i PRE:Cc IBOE 1126 IDAHO AVE. E 2e.QOi 56.201 13.2 5I- 466. ~CH'AC;i iCY,Er';':~ :319 .I;iE AVE. ~ ~..u,., 60.EBi :..- 51- 906 TAGOakT IRETA X515 PINE RVE. E I 55.2dt 43.121 9x.1 _ -:020 :CDE'R',S IDRViD 1;33 Y,ING Si. _ ~ ~2.ddl k4.O0i 55.E x1-3352 I GREGO~iY (STEVEN 1225 RING ST. E I 41.aO1 44.001 85.8 -__ _ .. emu. , .,,t,,c_ :U, ~ iJL;,c='H 2'„ " ST. E i cR., 22.?,61 _.35. 60.8 . c1-3570 1 rLRi:E .DRLE E. 155 ADR ST. E I 3S.~0i 135.401 17'x. _.-::~:0 ; ..;.--_ li(IhE'eRLY .;24 3RD ST. E -c.::al 32.441 54._ _.-.,..,.~ ,,,.~icltlea6 S~~:LTeG iD"ES I '',402 2ND ST. E 1 ;02.141 7"x.301 laL4 •C:TTY DF I'1EIiTDT:ah1 ~ DELIFIDUENCY LIST - ROOM. Li I%ETEFi DFiDEF< Delinquency Tiae = 68 Days / Miniau® Dollar Reount: 10.00 Book-Meter A: 1-IB to 01103/95 PAGE: ? ROOK I i------- PAST DUE AMOUNTS ---------. rETBk R i- ------------------ RESIDENT HARE ----------------- --I ----- SERVICE STREET ADDRESS --- --I CURRENT I ARREARS I TOT ERL. 52-4200 I LORCHFk IPHILiP G 1432 2ND ST. E I 37.001 I 100.001 14.. e~2 52- 242 I i. .. KENTUCKY FRIED CHICY.EN A640554 I I I 1677 1ST ST. E I 576.901 1668.60{ 2245.581 52- 260 I MILD SHAMROCK PARTNERSHIP 1 1516 MERIDIRN ST. S I 12.fl81 32.001 44.00: 52- 292 ' CH'eVRON STRTICN I 1180 CEHTRRL DR. E I 577.601 597.581 1175.10: 69- 46 1 WILLIAMS (DAVID 11877 GOLDSMITH RVE. 5 I 35.2E1 63.201 58.40! 69- 518 I GA55 IRON 2 JRNiCE 11155 BORZOI ST. E I 88.601 95.801 124.40'. 65- 528 I FIELDS IMARVIN & KflTHLYN 11044 REACOCY. ST. E I 35.201 77.121 112.32. 59- 538 i LRFEVER IRCNALD & RITA 11169 PEACOCK 5T. E I 22.001 66.001 88.'e5 69- 686 I HENDERSHOT CGN5TRUCTIDN 1 11157 PUFFIN 5T. E I I 70.801 70.0011 05-1350 1 OLENCO, INC. I 1581 TRMRICR CT. E I 22.001 301.081 323.201 69-1610 I ALCNSO IRNTGNIQ 11928 5TH WY. SE i 74.8"al 99.801 174.601 i I i i i 74- 13 I HOCKLEY (ALFRED R SEAN 143 7TH AVE. SY I 38.501 48.601 87.181 74- 70 PORTEk ikiii 1469 7TH RVE. SW I 45.101 75.001 180.12: 74- 354 1 5AUNDERS IMICHREL & STACY 1678 HANOVEk CT. I 28.'01 74.701 1@J'.30'. 74- 384 I RODE ISHERYL 1656 FULMER CT. I 38.581 67.401 105. :2i 74- 426 I LACY IGLORIR 1623 BRRRETT ST. 1 82.201 52.681 74.6E; 74- 670 ; MAY (LESLIE 1654 ERkRETT ST. 1 31.101 65.201 ;7.10: 74-1084 i NEALE iEDWRRD 8 MADORR 1102 1ST ST. id ~ 25.301 o6.4B1 91.'2 74 :47E 1 DRNZER IJQHN 1613 MERIDIRN ST. S I 12.Q01 24.001 36.'01 74-2524 1 LOVELL ITHOMRS 11353 KIMRR 5T. Y I 88.501 53.981 82.401 74 2696 1 SHEPHEkD IKEHT 1104 CRESTwOQD DR. I 45.101 87.601 132.'? 74-2714 I GIVENS IDRRLENE 11010 CRESTWQOD DR. i 31.901 60.381 92.70! 74-2723 I OGDEH (DEBRA 11112 CRE5Tfd00D DR. I 31.581 57.201 89.101 74-2858 i CHEcSBkOUGH 13AMES G. 1519 SPOONBILL AVE. 5 i 28.681 62.001 56.621 ?;-3010 I BROTZi1RN IHEIiRY 1665 CRN4'RSBRCK WY. 3 I 45.101 64.801 104.901 74-3036 l URRTR IFkflNK d BARBflRA 1925 LOON 5T. W I 28.601 51.601 80.501 ~ 1 .. , 74-3e"38 i RULE .. ICEERA 11134 GREENHERD -R. W 1 28.601 61.601 98.42. 74-3326 i "OUNG IMICiiRR A. 11516 GREENHEAD DR. 'd - -- I 35.201 -------- 61.801 97.c'2 TG~RLS - ------------------------ ------- " . i a.4a.b.0a{ SJ1005..;31 G~ ..,. S4'„"1.-° OUT OF ORDER: 34-1952 - KELLY GENE HOOVER 51-3234 - GARY KNOX 885 E. WZLLOWBROOK DR. 61.60 108.00 169.6 205 E. 2ND STREET 22.00 98.00 120.0 TOTAL DUE: $29,262.53