Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994 05-03MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TUESDAY, MAY 3, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD APRIL 19, 1994: (APPROVED) 1. TABLED AT APRIL 19, 1994 MEETING: LEASE AGREEMENT WITH KEN HAMILTON PRESENTATIONS: (TABLED UNTIL MAY 17, 1994) 2. TABLED AT APRIL 19, 1994 MEETING: UV EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION BID RESULTS: (APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS) 3. ELK RUN SUBDIVISION NO. 2 RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS: (APPROVED WITH CORRECTIONS) 4. ORDINANCE #647 - SPORTSMAN POINTE ANNEXATION: (APPROVED) 5. AMENDED ORDINANCE #645 - SUMMERFIELD ANNEXATION: (APPROVED) 6. AMENDED ORDINANCE #646 - FAWCETT'S MEADOWS ANNEXATION: (APPROVED) 7. AMENDED RESOLUTION 111-A - BUILDING PERMIT FEES: (APPROVED) 8. FINAL PLAT: FIELDSTONE MEADOWS NO. 4, 40 LOTS GARY VOIGHT AND NUBBLE ENGINEERING: (APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS) 9. FINAL PLAT: HAVEN COVE NO. 4, 46 LOTS BY S.I. DEVELOPMENT AND DAVID COLLINS: (TABLED UNTIL HAVEN COVE SUBDIVISION NO. 1 COMPLETED SATISFACTORILY) 10. WATER/ SEWER/ TRASH DELINQUENCIES: (APPROVED) 11. APPROVE BILLS: (APPROVED) 12. DEPARTMENT REPORTS: A. WALT MORROW: 1. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS 2. GROWTH B. BOB CORRIE 1. IMPACT FEE: APPROVE SPENDING UP TO $1000.00 FOR LEGAL FEES: (APPROVED) C. MAYOR KINGSFORD: 1. GOLF COURSE DONATION: NEED APPROVAL TO SIGN THE DEED: (APPROVED) MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MAY 3, 1994 The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council meeting was called to order by Mayor Grant Kingsford at 7:30 P.M.: Members Present: Bob Corrie, Ron Tolsma, Max Yerrington, Walt Morrow: Others Present: Will Berg, Shari Stiles, Gary Smith, John Baker: MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD APRIL 19, 1994: Kingsford: Are there any corrections to those minutes? Corrie: Mr. Mayor, I move we approve the minutes. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Max to approve the April 19th minutes, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #1: TABLED AT APRIL 19, 1994 MEETING: LEASE AGREEMENT WITH KEN HAMILTON PRESENTATIONS: Kingsford: Do you have a report on that Mr. Tolsma? Tolsma: I talked to Mr. Crookston tonight and he had not met with Mr. Hamilton (inaudible) I guess we will have to table it for another 2 weeks. Morrow: Second Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Walt to table the lease agreement for 2 weeks all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #2: TABLED AT APRIL 19, 1994 MEETING: UV EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION BID RESULTS: Kingsford: At this time I would recommend to the Council that they go into Executive Session to meet with the Attorney under item F of the State Code 672346 to consider and advise its legal representatives of pending litigation or whether its a general public awarement of probable litigation. At this time I will entertain a motion to go into • Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 2 Executive Session. Morrow: So moved Tolsma: Second 0 Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to go into Executive Session to consider pending or probably litigation, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: We stand adjourned to Executive Session to my office. EXECUTIVE SESSION Kingsford: Let's call the meeting back to order, the subject as I said going in was to consider pending litigation or probable litigation. The Council has made a preliminary decision, they decided that they will allow Trammel Inc., first off the bid is still responsive and we will allow Trammel Inc. the opportunity to correct the defect in their bid and if that is corrected and brought back the City will accept that low bid. There is case law that allows that remedy. So, if you will advise your client of that and we move along posthaste, part of the decision is the threat of lawsuit from EPA. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would like to capsule that in 5 days. So moved Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to have that corrected within a 5 calendar day period, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #3: ELK RUN SUBDIVISION NO. 2 RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS: Kingsford: Council members have you received that and reviewed them? Counselor do you have any comments with regard to them? Crookston: 1 have written my comments out and delivered them to Will. Ron: Your comments are on the copies that we have here? • Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 3 0 Crookston: Yes, I assume that is where your copies came from. Kingsford: I think it would be appropriate to approve those covenants subject to amending them to the City Attorney's notes. Morrow: So moved Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of the Elk Run protective restrictions and covenants conditioned upon meeting the Attorney's amendments, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #4: ORDINANCE #647 - SPORTSMAN POINTE ANNEXATION: Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 NE 1/4 OF SECTION 19, T. 3N, R. 1 E, B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like Ordinance #647 read in its entirety? Is there a motion? Yerrington: I move for approval of 647 with suspension of the rules. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve Ordinance #647 with suspension of the rules, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Corrie - Yea, Tolsma - Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #5: AMENDED ORDINANCE #645 - SUMMERFIELD ANNEXATION: Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 32, T. 4N, R. 1 E, B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like amended Ordinance #645 read in its entirety? Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 4 Corrie: Mr. Mayor, I move we approve Ordinance #645 with the suspension of the rules. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Max to approve amended ordinance #645 with suspension of the rules, Counselor on my agenda it is Amended Ordinance #645 on the Ordinance you prepared it is just #645 does that require amended in front of it. Crookston: It should Kingsford: The correction will be made on the signed copy, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Corrie - Yea, Tolsma - Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #6: AMENDED ORDINANCE #646 - FAWCETT'S MEADOWS ANNEXATION: Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE - MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like amended Ordinance #646 read in its entirety? Is there a motion? Tolsma: Mr. Mayor I move we approve the amended ordinance #646 with suspension of the rules. Corrie: Second Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Bob to approve amended Ordinance #646 with suspension of the rules, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Corrie - Yea, Tolsma - Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #7: AMENDED RESOLUTION 111-A - BUILDING PERMIT FEES: Kingsford: Council members have you reviewed that, does it meet with your • Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 5 satisfaction? This is a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho providing for the adoption of the City of Meridian Building permit fee schedule for residence. Is there a motion? Yerrington: We should have an effective date. I move that we approve #111-A with an effective date of June 1, 1994. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Approve by Max, second by Ron to approve of Resolution #111-A with an effective date of June 1, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: 3 YEAHS, 1 NEA (MORROW) ITEM #8: FINAL PLAT: FIELDSTONE MEADOWS NO. 4, 40 LOTS BY GARY VOIGHT AND HUBBLE ENGINEERING: Kingsford: Council members do you have any questions on the plat for Fieldstone Meadows No. 4? Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I have several questions for Mr. Smith. Gary, in you memorandum dated the 26th, there are several areas that I need clarification it says this final plat general conforms to the previously approved preliminary plat based on past discussions, I am not sure what this means. The final plat contains 40 lots with the same general area of the preliminary plat that contained 37 lots. Can you tell me what that means, do we know why that has happened? Smith: The original, Mr. Mayor and Council members and Councilman Morrow, the original preliminary plat had 2 short culdesacs that were part of the area encompassed by this final plat. The previous final plat on this preliminary plat included they plot these culdesacs so that the culdesacs were included in the previous phases of Fieldstone. And consequently there were more lots that showed up on this phase than were shown on the preliminary plat. I didn't go back and count the lots of the final plats in number 2 and 3 as compared to the lots shown on the preliminary plat. I don't know for sure, I do not know overall how many lots have been final platted versus the number of lots shown on the preliminary plat. One of the things that has been happening to us lately is that there have been changes taking place between preliminary plat, the time of the preliminary plat approval and the time that the final plats come in. Generally speaking these changes are not at the request of your city Staff or Planning & Zoning or the Public Works Department or the City Planner, but there are changes taking place by the developer or their engineer/ planner that may Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 6 better fit the ground situation for example or sometimes the street alignments will change a little bit for one reason or another. I guess I am kind of in a position that I don't know what is to be considered a significant change from preliminary platting to the final plat. I remember in years past if the final plat contained a similar number of lots as approved on the preliminary plat, if we had some minor variations in the street alignment it wasn't considered a significant change. And it was processed on through the review procedure. But, if there were additional lots platted in the final plat from the original approved preliminary then there was exception taken to that by the Planning Administrator, and if 1 remember the plat didn't proceed any further. But I don't know in my own mind what is considered a significant change and I guess that is what prompted my comment. Morrow: Okay, also, I guess the other thing is that the applicant's intent to designate a house floor area for each lot it should be shown and apparently that wasn't in lots 38, 42, and 55 of Block 7, need to have the frontage increased to 70 feet for ordinance compliance. The issue about the street name I don't perceive to be a major issue. Number 5 the center line of the stub street needs to be shown approximately 135 feet north of the Real Beginning on this project's ease boundary. The stub street will align with the proposed stub street in the proposed Turtle Creek subdivision. This stub would provide a cross tie for neighborhood traffic circulation and also a right of way for sewer service to the southwest corner of the proposed Turtle Creek project. No lots would be lost by the location of this stub, in fact the lots to the north of the stub would be enhanced in their width. Have we had any feedback, that seems to me to make good sense, have we had any feedback from the development team that they will comply with that? Smith: Yes, they have complied, they have told me verbally that they will comply with it. I gave a copy, I made a copy of my sketch and gave that to the developer who was in attendance at the last Planning & Zoning meeting and I have received verbal work from the engineer that they don't have a problem with that. And they would proceed with that change. I talked to Shari and between us we don't feel that is a major significant change to the previously approved preliminary plat. Morrow: This item #5 is not? Smith: The one above, there were no loss of lots to the developer there is additional length of street that they would have to build the stub portion, but again I think it enhances the width of the lots to the north of the stub street to the degree that perhaps they are worth a little more money than they were as they were shown on the final plat. Some of these other things, I know Shari mentioned that she was recommending a pathway connection between this phase and the previously platted • Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 7 • culdesac, they seem to be receptive to that request also. The sub -standard width on (inaudible) is I would say typical of plats that are submitted. Sometimes they for one reason or another they will come through with a less than ordinance standard on the frontage and typically they are corrected without any problem. They will take a little bit off of adjacent lots, maintaining their minimum frontage and increasing the frontage of the lot that is sub -standard. So, I don't consider that to be a major issue either. Morrow: Your overall view of this and you are kind of asking from us guidance as to what constitutes major and what doesn't. What is your feeling in terms of this proposal given the fact that we are dealing, some of the things are very minor, does this constitute major change from between the preliminary and where we are at now? Are you uncomfortable? Smith: I don't know, I am not comfortable particularly with it, like I mentioned when I began my statement. I am not sure overall, over the entire subdivision how many lots have been platted in the final form verses how many lots were shown on the approved preliminary. I did not go back and count lots in #1, 2, and 3 or Sunnybrook #5 which is a part of this total preliminary plat. I would guess that we are not looking at a substantial change in the number of lots, but I can't say positively to that. Morrow: Okay Smith: And again I don't know if that is the magic number but if you change one lot is that a major or substantial change. I know if they lost a lot we wouldn't say a thing about it, but if they pick up a lot for one reason or another, perhaps the street alignment changes somewhat, they able to increase it by one lot and still meet the dimensional requirement of the ordinance. Morrow: Well, I think from my perspective major change probably means the addition of more than 2 or 3 lots and it probably means that we 3 or 4 more items that are not resolved on here or not very well done. If they have made the adjustment in terms of the street, the stub street and I have some questions to ask Shari also, and if those things that were her concerns have been addressed than I think that we are pretty close in the ballpark from my perspective. That would be all the questions that I have. Kingsford: With regard to that number of lots I think we ought to look at a percentage, my calculation is that is roughly 7.5% to move. Morrow: A gain of 7.5%? What is your feeling about Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 8 Kingsford: Well, I don't know, I am just saying when its 2 or 3 lots, when it is a 10 lot subdivision (inaudible) if it is 100 then its not. I think we need to consider a percentage and I'm not sure maybe 7.5% is a huge percentage it sure isn't significant though. Morrow: Can we come up with a pat answer fro this? Kingsford: Well, after hearing Gary's comments they are a little different than what he has in his notes. I'm not sure that we can on this issue. I would say that if Mr. Smith is comfortable with the verbals that he has from the engineer and that they meet those I think we can authorize him to sign that plat conditioned upon those things being met. Morrow: I don't disagree with that, I guess Gary if you are looking for a standard to be used in the future whether it is a percentage or number of lots I think for me that would be difficult to give you that standard. I think maybe we look at them on a case by case basis. Smith: That is fine and I would be happy to just report the numbers to you and that way you could take that under advisement and make a decision based on the number that I report. Corrie: Gary, I agree with the Mayor could you give us not only the number but also the percentage of that as well? Smith: Yes Corrie: I would feel a little more comfortable with that too. Smith: And I will look at the total project number rather than just the individual final plat so that you know overall what is happening on the number of lots. Kingsford: On that subject too Council members, did you receive the letter from Jim Merkle from Hubble Engineering with regard to a request to pay into the Well fund fee and the comments with regard to that. It was just receive today, I don't know. Morrow: I received it, it is one of those deals that we have started that trend and at some point you have to draw the line and go forward. And I think that point has been reached and passed. Kingsford: Were you also in receipt of a letter from Mr. Goldsmith and his attorney • Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 9 on that subject? • Morrow: Yes, and I think the things that they are overlooking and I highlighted it in my Zoning and Development Ordinance that we have here. The question is, the statute clearly says may be waived, it would appear to me that when we finally come to a situation where we have Nampa Meridian involved and it looks like we are going to get this thing off dead center and get headed in the right direction and in what 3 months I have been here in several of these staff analysis it is indicated setting foundation heights at a minimum elevation because of high groundwater problems. When you take into consideration the groundwater, the cost of deep well water that should be used and we are not using the surface water to irrigate, it seems to me now is the time to stop. And if press forward and make the system work and it solves 2 things, it helps rid us of the high groundwater problems and it also begins to utilize a abundant resource in normal years and takes away so much dependence upon a scarce resource. Kingsford: Is there a motion then on first the final plat? Corrie: Mr. Mayor, I believe there are some questions for Shari. Kingsford: Shari Morrow: My questions would be on the irrigation or drainage ditches on this property will have to be tiled to the satisfaction of downstream users and the irrigation district. Is there an evidence that sizing has been done or the request has been met to you? Stiles: Mayor and Council, Councilman Morrow, I haven't talked to them about any of my comments, I don't know if Gary had addressed any of that with them. I'm just trying to cover all the bases and make sure, it has been such a continuing problem with literally every project that I wanted to make sure that was in there. Morrow: And then also have the covenants and restrictions been submitted to Counselor for review? Crookston: I have some that I have not yet reviewed because I just recently received, but I am not sure that they are among those. Morrow: I have no other, we have talked about the pedestrian access and we have talked about the floor square footage so I have no other questions. Kingsford: Mr. Corrie did you have any questions? U Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 10 Corrie: No, thank you Mr. Mayor. Kingsford: What is your pleasure? i 1 U Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move we approve the final plat subject to the covenants and restrictions being approved by Counselor, subject to pressurized irrigation and subject to the meeting of all the articles that Gary Smith has alluded to that are verbal that those accomplished and Shari's. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve the final plat of Fieldstone Meadows No. 4 subject to approval of the restrictive covenants, pressurized irrigation and that the items in Mr. Smith's and Ms. Stiles be met as well as the verbal agreements reached with their engineer, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM # 9: FINAL PLAT: HAVEN COVE NO. 4, 46 LOTS BY S.I. DEVELOPMENT AND DAVID COLLINS: Kingsford: Council members do you have questions on that issue? Morrow: I have several questions concerning that. Again I would like to address my questions to Gary Smith. Mr. Smith in reviewing your letter, item 2 a roadway access to Dr. Coe Parker's property and the extension of North Clara Avenue and I note that there were several letters in this packet concerning that and the potential to landlock that property. There also as I understood it this was an indication before P & Z that it was to be done but there was a change between the preliminary and the final plat with respect to serving that property with a stub street. Smith: Mr. Mayor and Council members, Councilman Morrow, the preliminary plat on Haven Cove subdivision did not show an access into Dr. Coe Parker's property. The preliminary plat did show an access into the west into the Stonehouse Evangelical Church property which was deleted after I reviewed the preliminary. My comment was that it wasn't necessary to have that access into the church property so it was deleted. On the preliminary plat there were 3 points of access shown along its south boundary along Haven Cove subdivision south boundary. One access was into Tom Eddy's property which is immediately adjacent to the east boundary of Dr. Parker's. And that access was fairly close to Dr. Parker's common corner with Tom Eddy. There was another access shown farther to the east out of the south boundary of • Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 11 E Haven Cove and there was another access shown near the southeast corner of Haven Cove into what would be, I don't know if you are aware of Alloy Schelkeway's property out there he has a narrow easement lane that comes north off of Pine pack to his house, his property is right adjacent to the High Schools west boundary. In the process of the subdivision review by the Highway District they eliminated the access into the Schelekway property and required the developer to construct a culdesac. I had requested that the access out of the west boundary of this Haven Cove property into the Church property because it served no purpose. And so that resulted in 2 access points then out of the south boundary. Subsequently the developer has proposed that a single access point be allowed into the Tom Eddy property farther to their northeast corner. Moving that previously located access at his northwest corner to the northeast comer. So, I felt and the developer and his engineer has agreed and they have submitted a revised final plat which we just got tonight but I have been in conversation previously that they will provide a stub access into Dr. Parker's property. Which would be an extension of North Clara Avenue as I had requested. So, Dr. Parker will have access through Haven Cove. Water will also access through Haven Cove, sewer is proposed to access in through the proposed Valeri Heights subdivision and we are all assuming that is going to go forward. Although it has been kind of quiet lately. Tolsma: The sewer that Dr. Parker was basically coming from Valeri Heights subdivision, but if the Valeri Heights subdivision isn't pursued then where will his water and sewer lines go? Smith: Well, his water can still come from Haven Cove, but the sewer is such an elevation it is awfully shallow there that I don't think it will serve into Dr. Parker's property and maintain a cover above the sewer line that we are trying to maintain to protect the lines. So, he will really need to go to the west. And really his property has always in my limited study of that area needed to be served to the west to Ten Mile Road. We have been fighting grade on sewer in Haven Cove from day 1. We have some less than minimum slope on sewer line out there. And it is basically on the down stream ends of the, except we do have some in #4 that are of minimum slope, but basically on the down, lower end of the sewer lines. And so we will be able to take advantage of flow, we will have more flow in those lines. Tolsma: Another thing you stated in there was the access back down to Cherry Lane off of Haven Cove is going to be on the northeast corner of the Eddy property. Smith: What item is that? Tolsma: It shows a separation from Haven Cove (inaudible) • Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 12 • Smith: That is just the adjacent plat, Haven Cove #4 will have a stub street out of its south boundary into Tom Eddy property which will immediately connect, well it will be right near Tom Eddy's northeast corner and then it will immediately slink east into what is proposed as Haven Cove #5 and then that will continue to the south to Pine. So, then Haven Cove #5 has been submitted as a preliminary plat will have access off of Pine and will connect to Haven Cove #4. Tolsma: But then the East Clara Avenue goes back to (inaudible) Smith: Yes correct, it will be, well, I think the center of the street is about 125 feet east of this projects southwest corner. So, it is right at that southwest corner. Dr. Parker's property actually stands west, part of it is west of the west boundary of the Haven Cove. Tolsma: Just reading through the letters that Dr. Parker submitted (inaudible) agreed (inaudible) property. Smith: Right, it has been a somewhat constant item of discussion but I guess when it came time to review the final plat it was, I tried to make it as clear as possible, but that street needed to be provided and the developer and his engineer agreed. I think one reason that I kept pointing out to them is that originally there were 4 stub streets along, well 3 on the south boundary and one on the southwest corner and out of those 4 without the stub to Dr. Parker's property 3 have been deleted. So, I didn't feel that there was any particular problem requiring that this access be provided to Dr. Parker. Morrow: I have another question with respect to item 3, an adequate easement with more than 5 feet is needed for the irrigation pipes to be placed between Lots 14 and 15 and, Lots 33 and 34, has that been done? Smith: I talked to Dave Collins engineer for the project and he said that the pipes have been installed and that they will situate these in such that the pipes have adequate room. Morrow: And those pipes provide continuing flow to downstream users? Smith: Yes Morrow: Was the sizing of those pipes with input from the downstream users? Smith: I don't know Councilman Morrow, I would only assume that it was taken into O Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 13 account. 00 Kingsford: I see a shaking of the head in the negative from the engineer. Mr. Collins is shaking his head in the negative, you didn't talk to downstream users on the sizing of the pipe. Collins: I used figures provided to me by Nampa Meridian Irrigation District, who knows totally what water is used downstream, rather than relying on downstream (inaudible). I have (inaudible) 150% of the discharge. Kingsford: Dave, would you come up so we have it on tape? Collins: What i do on these is go to Nampa Meridian and get what the diversion is plus the surge factor that John Anderson has assigned to that particular facility and I pass that amount of water through the check gate or through our subdivision. So, we have 100 minor inch water right on that ditch and we have a 150 minor inch capacity in our system. Morrow: Now, does that take into account how the downstream users use the thing. I have seen irrigation ditches where the capacity met all of the sizing requirements that the engineers used but in reality they didn't work because they didn't take into consideration how the downstream water users use the water. I think that is the intent in terms of getting some input from those folks, granted there are isolated incidences but I don't want the City to get in a position where we approve an irrigation piping based on information that comes from quote the books. And in reality if somebody had talked to one of the downstream users we would have found out that doesn't work. So, we have to come back after the fact and tear out pipes and put in drains and whatever to de -water the property or to prevent flooding or denying somebody their full head of water downstream. And so the point of the my question with respect to conferencing or at least talking to one of the downstream users is that you get a feel for the peculiarities of the system may be. That isn't something that John Anderson would know or anybody else, because once the water goes into the ditches that service the users, the irrigation district doesn't care. Collins: The system was designed with input from Tom Eddy who is on that same moon discharge and I talked with only one downstream user, he has got less than 5 acres down there. Most of the land that services is subdivided now so most of the water goes through to Settlers I believe, on down to the waste end of the ditch. Most of it is not used now, but it has been released in ditches and I have my system designed just piping the ditches basically where they were. The head gates I learned my lesson from Lounsbury are out on the street instead of on the lot lines so we don't Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 14 need easements. We ran out to the street and then back down this way so we could have the gates controlled on the street rather than the rear yards and stuff like that. We have one diversion on site there which will probably never be used because it diverts over to the church and 1 think they buried their own little local delivery ditch about 2 weeks ago, so they will probably never use the water provided to them. But the gate is there to provide it to them. And the rest of it flows through, it was used on the Stucker farm and of course Mr. Stucker is not interested in any of that being provided anymore, then from there it all went downstream and that is what our pipe does. It goes to the ditch on Quan Do and it just goes back to its original configuration. Morrow: Another question for Gary, item 6, Haven Cove #3 subdivision, an adjacent plat subdivision is not recorded at this time, what does that mean for us? Smith: The only thing it means Councilman Morrow is that I do not have a plat of record on #3, although it is under construction right now. It is shown as an adjacent plated subdivision on #4 subdivision. The County Engineer won't let #4 be recorded until #3 is recorded anyway. Morrow: Is this kind of a technicality, is there Smith: Yes, it is a technicality. Morrow: And then #10, the double irrigation drain pipe, you indicated that you didn't think a 10 foot wide easement is adequate for an 18 inch pipe, a 15 inch pipe plus the stuff that is being requested by US West and Cable TV folk. Can you explain that? Smith: Well, recently I noticed comments coming back from US West requesting a 10 foot easement on each side of rear lot lines, our ordinance only requires a 5 foot easement on each side of rear lot lines. Typically most engineers and developers have been providing 10 feet on the rear lot lines that are also subdivision boundary lines. The interior rear lot lines though are the ones that apparently US West and Cable TV are having trouble staying within a 5 foot easement. And I think I can safely say that the way they plow those cables in they need that extra room. They run in anything but a straight line. Morrow: But that is a management point on there part isn't it? I Smith: It is Morrow: Why should we give them more easement for that so that they can do E Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 15 0 sloppy work? Is this easement that we are requesting here a greater width easement because of the piping, the irrigation piping? Smith: That was my concern yes. If you have the drunken sailor attitude plowing that cable and also have an 18 inch and 15 inch pipe I could almost guarantee that cable is going to be outside that easement, but again I talked to Dave Collins and he has assured me that the pipes, their location will be measured and the easement width will be appropriate for the pipes and the underground cable. We can verify that together in the field if you would like, I would be happy to do that to make sure it is. Morrow: I think that would be the case from my perspective. My last question is with respect to #12, Block 1 is to be a 20 wide common area lot with an underlying 20 foot sanitary sewer easement. Has that been done? Smith: Yes, he has agreed to do that. Morrow: I have no further questions. Kingsford: Counselor have you received the covenants on this? Crookston: If I have I haven't had an opportunity to look at them. Smith: They were just dropped to Shari tonight. Morrow: I have some questions for Shari also. Corrie: Mr. Mayor, before Shari gets up here, Mr. Collins have you seen Shari's comments? Thank you. Morrow: Shari, can you kind of take us through the letter on where we stand. There are several paragraphs here that I would like you to review and let us know what the response has been to your questions. The preliminary plat, in the first paragraph, is 191 building lots, had 2 ponds one with an irrigation pump shown as lots, it now appears that there are a total of 194 building lots included in Haven Cove 1 to 4. 1 guess the question there is where did the other 3 lots come from? Is that what you are alluding to? Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council members, Councilman Morrow, I was just making an observation from going back to the original plat, it has been many years since that preliminary plat came in and just noted that they did have 2 ponds and there were shown a total of 191 lots, but it looked like there were only 191 building lots. I was Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 16 just stating that now they had a total of 194 building lots. Morrow: Okay then item #2 is Lot 27 - Block 1 needs to be 8,000 square feet exclusive the sanitary easement, has that adjustment been made? (End of Tape) Stiles: Yes I received tonight a new copy of the plat that corrects that. Morrow: And then the third paragraph, will you review that for us please? There is only one way in and out, has that been resolved. It says the P & Z originally approved of a preliminary with condition that after a 100 lots were developed a second street to Cherry Lane be provided, has that in fact been provided? Stiles: I believe it has through #3, however since it hasn't been recorded it isn't showing up on any of my maps. So, it still appears that there is still the one entrance. Morrow: So, in reality is there one entrance or 2? Gary is signaling that there are 2. The fourth paragraph addresses the minimum square footage of the houses. Has that been taken care of? Stiles: It isn't on the copy that I received tonight, this is becoming a real problem with subdivisions that are zoned at another time and come in and they are still using the old ordinance requirements. Which makes it very difficult for realtors or anyone to look at the plat, and say how many square feet are we really supposed to have. And it is in our ordinance that it be required on all plats and I just want that noted on the plat for the record. Morrow: And you got the covenants and restrictions this evening which was the next paragraph. And then your final paragraph says that if plat is to remain as submitted I recommend it be rejected and go back through P & Z. If the plat is revised and addressed all the items noted above I recommend the plat be approved and subject to these and other staff and agency comments be met. Given the information tonight what is your preference? Stiles: I would recommend that if all of these things are taken care as well as Gary's concerns and other agency concerns then it be approved subject to those conditions. And also to the approval of the covenants by the City Attorney. Morrow: Has a large part of this information been provided to you just tonight, you have not had an opportunity to review the information provided. I reviewed it only when you were in executive session, but I have a chance to review and make known • Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 17 L' to the engineer what is required beyond what has been submitted tonight. Morrow: I guess my last question is, is the pressurized irrigation system is that in these subdivisions already we have talked about the ponds with the irrigation pump. Stiles: I wasn't clear about that, it seemed like it must have been originally proposed for pressurized irrigation but evidently it is not included now. I don't know what the original intent of the ponds was. It seemed to be an irrigation system. Morrow: Can you answer that Gary? Smith: Councilman Morrow, I don't recall when the preliminary plat was approved and i am assuming we would need to look at some dates as to when the pressurized irrigation was required verses when this preliminary plat was approved. I don't recall any details being submitted previously on pressurized irrigation and I'm not sure whether they have been paying the well development fee. Collins: I don't recall accurately whether this was required to have pressurized irrigation, if it was my recollection is that the developer wanted to pay the fee into the City for the development. The well indicated was a site, I had indicated for a City well, for a City domestic well that is what the well was. As far as the ponds those were proposed drainage ponds which I put in the preliminary when I got in final design with better survey information. I was able to eliminate those ponds which I am more than glad to do because they were a hazard and a nuisance. That is why the ponds went away, the well was supposed to be a City well but your geotechnical consultant indicated it was too close to another existing City well for a site so we deleted that. But the developer, 1 don't remember whether he is paying on this one (inaudible) but it is one or the other. Kingsford: I think Mr. Smith's comments there with regard to researching some dates is probably appropriate. My recollection is that it came before our ordinance for pressurized irrigation, but I could stand corrected. In any event it probably ought to be paying the well fees at least on the phases that have come in since it has been in effect. Smith: Could I add one more comment, we have a little bit of a problem with the sewer easement and taking care of a sewer easement in Haven Cove #1. And I met in the field with the engineer Dave Collins and the developers representative, Wright Construction and it had to do with taking care of the sewer easement in #1 subdivision that was previously agreed to between the developer and myself which was not taken care of. And I was very unhappy with the whole situation and I told 0 0 Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 18 the developer and wrote a letter to the effect that I was withholding any further building permits in Haven Cove subdivision until this was taken care of. I met with those people at the site and we reviewed the situation, I subsequently wrote another letter and I condescended on a couple items to allow the homeowner to utilize the lot as they desire but also to protect our sewer easement and our access to our sewer line. I have not heard from anybody since that time. So I would request that the approval of Haven Cove #4 be conditioned upon satisfactory completion of the requirements that I outlined in my letter to the developer on #1 for protection of our sanitary sewer easement. I can guarantee to this Council and Mayor and any developer from this point forward that there will be no sewer lines placed in easements. Morrow: l think I would support that but it seems to me from the City Council or at least my standpoint I would be more comfortable tabling this until that in fact had been done. And if for no other reason than expression of support for the staffs position so that these things get accomplished in a timely manor. The other thing is I am a little uncomfortable with submitting the information during an executive session and expecting our staff to reply and put them on the spot and answer these questions and say yes at first glance it appears to be fine. So, that is a point of discussion is all. Kingsford: Any other comments Council? Corrie: I agree with Walt 100% that if we are still talking about subdivision #1 not meeting your specifications, here we are in number #4 1 don't think we should do anything until it is done. So, I would support the table motion if you want to put it forth Walt. Kingsford: Other discussion? Morrow: If not Mayor, I would move that we table the Final Plat of Haven Cove #4 until the problems with #1 are resolved. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to table Haven Cove subdivision #4 pending resolution of the problems of Haven Cove subdivision #1 with regard to sewer easement, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea 0 Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 19 Kingsford: Mr. Collins 0 Collins: If I may address the Council, the legals for correcting the easement difficulty in #1 are in preparation now, being reviewed by my lawyer before presenting them to your attorney. One is the City relinquishing part of the easement to the homeowner. The homeowner giving more easement to the City and those have to be reviewed by him. So, that is in preparation and review now and should be done Thursday. The other thing we weren't expecting to put staff on the spot this fax of all this information to me has May 2, 14:36 hour on the top of it so, I didn't really get where I have a whole lot of time to work on it. Although the major issues on #4 were rectified with Gary about 10 days ago and we have been working to revise our drawings. ITEM #10: WATER/ SEWER/ TRASH DELINQUENCIES: Kingsford: This is to inform you in writing, if you choose to, you have the right to a pre -determination hearing at 7:30 P.M. May 3, 1994 before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and defend the claim made by the City that your water, sewer, and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on May 11, 1994 unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest their water, sewer and trash delinquency? They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho code. Even though they appeal their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn off list is $11,201.78. 1 would entertain a motion to approve the tum off list. Yerrington: So moved Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve the turn off list, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #11: APPROVE BILLS: Tolsma: So moved Yerrington: Second Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 20 Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve the bills, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #12: DEPARTMENT REPORTS: Kingsford: Chief Gordon: Nothing Mr. Mayor Kingsford: Mr. Smith Smith: Nothing Kingsford: Ms. Stiles Stiles: Nothing Kingsford: Mr. Crookston Crookston: Nothing Kingsford: Don Bryan: Nothing Mr. Mayor Kingsford: Walter Morrow: Yes, I have 3 things I want to cover, I want to ask about or throw open for discussion to think about at a later time. In talking with Wayne, I know that we have to have the covenants and restrictions for each subdivision approved, it seems that there are some subdivisions offering subdivision services without homeowners associations. It seems to me like it makes good sense from a standpoint of local control within the subdivision with somebody from the subdivision that can represent the subdivision that we require homeowners associations be in all subdivisions. I bring that up as a point for discussion to be thought about and maybe if it makes sense than we make that a part of the requirement for subdivisions. I know what subdivisions that I build in the ones that seem to turn out the best and have the pride of ownership and the participation by the citizens are ones that have strong homeowners associations and it doesn't seem to matter whether they are $100,000 • Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 21 houses or $500,000 houses, they just work better and look better and it gives us a vehicle to cover the maintenance of the entryways and those kinds of things that the association is in place. Kingsford: Are those then mandatory homeowners associations, mandatory dues? Morrow: yes Kingsford: That would be my thinking that if you are going to have a homeowners association I think you need to have mandatory membership. Morrow: Mandatory membership, a vehicle for collection of dues and so on and so forth. In each case those work really well. On the ones that don't have a way of collecting dues they are toothless they don't seem to work well at all. The second thing that I wanted to ask about is in particular on Franklin Road there are a couple of structures that have been partially torn down they have been abandoned and they sit there. I think they are unsightly, they second think is they are an unattractive nuisance and then I would like to see the City adopt an ordinance requiring buildings that are either abandoned or partially destroyed to be collected up and hauled off to in a reasonably short period of time. Kingsford: Are you talking about Crookston neighbor out there? Morrow: I never thought of that, that has been nearly 2 years now and nothing has been done. In terms of our City it makes sense to have something on the books so we begin to look and act like a City and continue to support community pride but also rid ourselves of potential areas for juvenile crime and for young citizens to get hurt if they don't need to be. And so that was a food for thought. And the third thing is that in my 3 months on the Council now, in the departments that I have worked with it has become increasingly aware to me that we as a Council and the City administration kind of need to sit down and figure out what size City this is going to be and then begin to develop a strategic plan for infrastructure to support that size of City. In the things that we are struggling with in the sewer department and the trash and building department it has become clear that we don't have adequate space for the staff that it takes to run the size of business that we are trying to run. We don't have adequate staff to do those things. I think the time has passed that we have gone from a small community where we can do things in an informal manner to the point now where we need to start developing organizational charts and the goal at the end and in our case the goal is relatively easy to determine because we are landlocked by Eagle on the north and Boise on the east and Kuna on the south and the Ada County line on the west. So, we don't have an unending growth pattern that • Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 22 can occur, we can sit down and come to some sort of conclusion that Meridian will be a City 50,000 or 60,000 people and start working toward the necessary folks that it takes to support that type of City and those types of organizational charts it takes to accomplish that. The staff in the departments that I represent are because of the tremendous growth are pretty well overworked. We need to be looking in terms of how we staff for a City of the size that we think we will become and what the permanent staff should be. What it should take in terms of the temporary staff to help our folks to get to that point. What we need of facilities, granted many of those things may not be in place for 5 to 10 years but we need to be thinking about those things now. Nampa is a city that we are rapidly catching up with and you look around Nampa and they have recently done their physical education center and their place for their special event center and those kinds of things. And although we will utilize as many of those facilities that Boise has it is not to say that we shouldn't be looking in terms of some of those things coming along within our not to distant future. And so, I guess the point of what I am saying is that it would help in the departments that I work in or represent to have some sort of feel of where we are headed so that we are not making right and left turns, so that we can move forward with organizational charts and towards a goal. So that we are not spending the taxpayers dollar foolishly with unnecessary department changes because we are going to make some department changes in my departments to make them efficient. I want to make sure those changes are made with the long term in mind. And 1 am not exactly sure what the long term is. I know this kind of like a runaway locomotive now and if we can at least figure out where it is headed it might make it easier for us to get there. But, those are just some candid observations that I have seen having now completed 3 months. And that covers it. Kingsford: We are apt to be in real rough shape when you get to 6 months. Just a point of clarification, you said they are overworked or worked over? In some cases it is probably both. Morrow: My folks, some days it looks like they were drug to work and then run over with the truck. Kingsford: Shari you looked pretty good this evening, Gary you look a bit tattered. I apologize, I keep saying things will get better I am just wondering when. Mr. Yerrington Yerrington: Tomorrow afternoon this is a little on the light side, there are 12 of us gentlemen going to meet at the golf course and play with the Idaho State Police. I think they are going to have about 24 people and we will have about 12, but we can probably throw them anyway. • Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 23 Kingsford: Sorry some of you have to work. Bob 0 Corrie: Yes, Mr. Mayor 2 things. One is a point of information, are we required by law to approve all of these covenants coming down. Kingsford: By ordinance Corrie: Because it seems as though we are approving all of this and we have no recourse if they don't want to do it. It just seems like a test of futility but if that is a thing I understand that. Second, was Walt was talking about looking ahead, perhaps we should think about a Council planning meeting sometimes where a group of us sit down and plan these things. 1 know our department is doing that and looking ahead 15 to 20 years as far as the fire department, I know the Police Department I just talked to them. So, I think Walt perhaps we could sit down and have a Council planning meeting along this line and see where we are going. I talked to the Mayor and I think he agrees to that. I have one other request for the Council, the Impact Fee Committee is meeting Friday, we are in need of some funds I am afraid. We have one attorney involved here that is in Boise that is working with their impact fees. It may $100 it may be as much as $3000 but we are hoping to keep it under $500 if we can. I would like to have approval from Council that if we do run into some financial points here that we can proceed. We hope within 60 days we can bring this Council with an ordinance and it will cost us something I don't know for sure what it is. But 1 would like to have it if the Council would like to have a solid fee I guess we could put it as much as $3000 and as less as $100 1 don't know where it is going to fall, Mr. Forrey hasn't given me that part of his wisdom yet, but I would like to have Council approval of at least some financial backing if we need it. Morrow: I don't have any objection to that, it makes sense. I don't know how you get accomplished in terms of $100 to $3000 is a pretty broad range. Corrie: And I really don't know, the way it is going right now it hasn't cost us anything, but if there happens to be some attorney fees whether its our attorney or what have you it is going to cost us a few dollars. Did you not receive anything at all Will, did Wayne Forrey talk to you at all about that. Okay, I am finding this happens more often than not. Can I say a $1000 base and then work from there? We are going to have to get these fees in line and get them on the board, if it takes more I will come back, but I don't anticipate it, let's just say $1000 if we need it and if we don't that is fine. Morrow: I have a question, where does the $1000 is it just the general fund budget? Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 24 Corrie: That was my next question, thank you Walt. Tolsma: Fire Department Corrie: We just spent $875 for a brakeless car Yerrington: Instead of paying the Police Department for that why don't you just take the $875 and apply it towards this. Corrie: Alright we can do that, I don't know Mr. Mayor if we can do that. Kingsford: I would entertain a motion for the possibility of spending up to $1000 for Mr. Corrie's fund. Yerrington: I make the motion Morrow: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve that up to a $1000 be spent on the Impact Fee issue, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Corrie: That is all Mr. Mayor Kingsford: And with regard to where the money comes from, Mr. Morrow, it can come from that fund and no doubt we will have to amend the budget and given the strength of the building report we will have additional funds and that is logical. Mr. Tolsma Tolsma: Echo on Walt's comments on the beautification. (Inaudible) We also had another one that had some comments, the Sunshine Heating and Cooling (inaudible) blocking traffic once in a while. And there have been a couple (inaudible) made comments about it also. Matter of fact they requested (inaudible). Kingsford: Did you want to check on that Shari? Tolsma: On the Sunshine Heating and Cooling that is in the back part of the old Langum building over here, the Carpet Headquarters or something like that. They were questioning whether the zoning was adequate for a fabricating operation in that area. 0 • Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 25 Kingsford: Were they fabricating, it is Old Town they have to have a conditional use and they certainly haven't come through with anything that I am aware of. I was unaware that they were actually working, fabricating. Tolsma: (Inaudible) heating and cooling place (inaudible) anyway they have a lot of trash piled up in the alley. They were concerned that sometimes they go out in the alley and can't get through the alley. Kingsford: Anything else? Tolsma: Oh, just more of what Walt said (inaudible) for negotiating on this land for parks development and stuff like this. (Inaudible) parks person out there is going to need help in the future and out water department is needing more (inaudible) as far as putting in (inaudible) they are going to be anticipating more help in the future also. The staff is going to keep growing. That is all I had. Kingsford: 1 think probably along that vein, Gary I know you don't have a whole lot to do so maybe you (inaudible) you and I could talk at some length several different years about the meter reading and automated meter reading. And one time we discussed the future that maybe we could contract with the telephone company and have that kind of automated meter reading. Those kinds of things we need to be thinking about. Any literature that you see on that technology I would certainly be interested in. We need to in my view stay as lean as we can. Cost certainly, manpower going up (inaudible) where we can be efficient. I think we have an obligation to do so. Is anyone aware, and Bob commented, if I guy wanted to rent a car from the Ugly Duckling where do we stand on that? The old Ugly Duckling Car Rental over here in the old motor shop. Tolsma: I don't think it is in operation Kingsford: Well it obviously is in operation Corrie: The sign says for sale, (inaudible) Kingsford: Ugly ducklings conditional use permit (inaudible) Stiles: There are other people that have been interested in that, they have been working with (inaudible) to (inaudible). Kingsford: Okay, the next item I need to ask for Council approval on to accept the donation of 31 or 32 acres of land from an individual that wishes to remain 0 Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 26 • anonymous. It is in a close proximity to the golf course specifically for municipal golf course and it has to be developed within 3 years or it would revert to Western Ada Recreation district. Morrow: I would move we accept the donation of anonymous gift of ground with City's most gracious thanks to that donor and that we respect his/her wishes to remain anonymous. Yerrington: Second Corrie: Second Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by the other 3 Councilmen to accept the land and thank them for their gracious donation, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: I think probably 1 need to have a motion to sign. Morrow: So moved Corrie: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob to have the Mayor sign that deed, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: Will Berg, do you have anything? Berg: No Kingsford: I would entertain the infamous motion. Corrie: So moved Yerrington: Second Tolsma: Second Meridian City Council May 3, 1994 Page 27 Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Max and Ron to adjourn, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:30 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) GRANT P. b.6 O. ATTEST: - &mAnNE"01 wg MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TUESDAY, MAY 3, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD APRIL 19,1994: 1. TABLED AT APRIL 19, 1994 MEETING: LEASE AGREEMENT WITH mad /Ick- KEN HAMILTON PRESENTATIONS: Tab - 2. TABLED AT APRIL 19, 1994 MEETING: UV EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION BID RESULTS:,lCow- T�a�.►.�.,�C, z/c. �r�= hof y�f p/zeb �k/�e�.� ih S &a/c, -W-'" da yr 3. ELK RUN SUBDIVISION NO. 2 RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS: ���orovc� wi •v eoFrcc-es ^'t'e-e Lily 4. ORDINANCE #647 - SPORTSMAN POINTE ANNEXATION: Ct�prnveaL- 5. AMENDED ORDINANCE #645 - SUMMERFIELD ANNEXATION: cPp,o✓c.C� 6. AMENDED ORDINANCE #646 - FAWCETT'S MEADOWS ANNEXATION: afl/0"0vptC- 7. RESOLUTION 111-A - BUILDING PERMIT FEES: �T&,?-e / r%, / q 9-f a^vs-Gvcd� 8. FINAL PLAT: FIELDSTONE MEADOWS NO. 4, 40 LOTS GARY VOIGHT AND RUBBLE ENGINEERING: ao'orove4 based. an paha'/�i�cs —U�O��-o�a.� off' �QJ>rG�iV,P C'ovPhR�S—�Jresru�l��rri���ib� � Pa�eiiv 9. FINAL PLAT: HAVEN COVE NO. 4, 46 LOTS BY S.I. DEVELOPMENT AND DAVID COLLINS: 10. WATER/ SEWER/ TRASH DELINQUENCIES: a ppro V'e 11. APPROVE BILLS: Plopry v e 12. DEPARTMENT REPORTS: 77 G PUBLIC MEETING SIGN-UP SHEET NAME: PHONE NUMBER: �fSS`('-1 ORDINANCE NO. -64-7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 NE 1/4 OF SECTION 19, T.3N., R.1E., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is described in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the real property described as: A parcel of land being a portion of the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 19, T.3N., R -1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 1" iron bar marking the 1/4 corner common to Sections 19 and 20, T.3N., R -1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, S. 89047136" W. 1083.91 feet; thence, N. 35009124" W. 66.16 feet; thence, N. 33036,54" W. 360.13 feet; thence, N. 0034155" E. 971.67 feet; thence, N. 89045139" E. 1324.80 feet; thence, S. 0034,25" W. 1327.31 feet along the east line of said Section 19 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned R-4 Residential; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - SPORTSMAN POINT Page 1 0 • ORIG11"AL ORDINANCE NO. 647 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 NE 1/4 OF SECTION 19, TAN., R.1E., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is described in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the real property described as: 0 A parcel of land being a portion of the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 19, TAN., R.1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, said _ parcel being more particularly described as follows: S.:,`.'. f Commencing at the 1" iron bar marking the 1/4 corner B01IS common to Sections 19 and 20, T.3N., R.lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; U`i o W. 1324.98 feet thence, S. 89 47 36 ; FEE ,.._ thence, N. 003415511 E. 1326.56 feet, REG; thence, N. 89045,39" E. 1324.80 feet; thence, S. 0°34,25" W. 1327.31 feet along the east line of said Section 19 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned R-4 Residential; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning. Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de - annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - SPORTSMAN POINT #4 Page 1 a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land. b. That the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted January 4, 1994. C. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and other matters. d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9- 605 M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways. e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the Applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns. f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. g. The requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this ,�_ day of lWa 1994. 41 ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - SPORTSMAN POINT #4 Page 2 11 IF - L -1 APPROVED: MA R -- GRANT KIN �SRD ATTEST: 4 ILLIAM G. BERG, JR. -- ITY CLERKS L W STATE OF IDAHO,) • Ss. o�"Y� . County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 NE 1/4 OF SECTION 19, T.3N., R.1E., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE", passed as Ordinance No. 647 by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the 3 day of *jA, 1994, as the same appears in my office. DATED this 9)�-I) day of, 1994. ry City Clerk, City Ada County, Idaho STATE OF IDAHO,) : Ss. County of Ada, ) On this -3r-o( day of�, 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above 01 written. `,,••.•;,,•E *oft,*tp k: SEAL ° do AV ® `0C, = esiri y om of ANNEXATION ORptINANCjk'w1WORTSMAN POINT #4 ......... ... Public for Idaho g at Meridian, Ida Fission Expires Page 3 � '6 ORIGINAL. ORDINANCE NO. 6 4 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 NE 1/4 OF SECTION 19, T.3N., R.lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is described in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the real property described as: A parcel of land being a portion of the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 19, T.3N., R.IE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 1" iron bar marking the 1/4 corner common to Sections 19 and 20, T.3N., R.1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; 1324,x8 thence, S. 89°47136" W. feet; feet;t4beaeey N. 3!5'09'24" 132(0 •5(0 thence, N. 0°34155" E. feet; thence, N. 89°45139" E. 1324.80 feet; thence, S. 0034125" W. 1327.31 feet along the east line of said Section 19 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned R-4 Residential; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - SPORTSMAN POINT Page 1 Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de - annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land. b. That the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted January 4, 1994. C. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and other matters. d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9- 605 M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways. e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the Applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns. f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. g. The requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this.3=D day of May, 1994. APPROVED: ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - SPORTSMAN POINT Page 2 MAYOR-�, • ' ATTEST: WILLIAM G. BERG, JR -- CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO,) : SS. County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 NE 1/4 OF SECTION 19, T.3N., R.lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE", passed as Ordinance No. 647 , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the 3,11b. day of May, 1994, as the same appears in my office. DATED this c, -T day of May, 1994. City Clerk, City of a idian Ada County, Idaho STATE OF IDAHO,) : SS. County of Ada, ) On this day of May, 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. g�'g89E888801,}'t v SEAL " _ ra ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - SPORTSMAN POINT 'ary Public -b= Idaho iding at Meridian, Idah Commission Expires Page 3 • • • RECEIVED MAY U 5 1994 M v N � 1 f . ��- 4 , 0 ORIGINAL AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 646 AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is described in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the real property described as: A parcel of land in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 19, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 19; thence South 00°55100" West, 1519.92 feet to THE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 00°55100" West, 583.50 feet; thence South 89059115" East, 1121.3 feet; thence North 00°46150" East, 583.47 feet; thence North 89°59115" West, 1120.32 feet to THE POINT OF BEGINNING. is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned R-4 Residential; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning. Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de - annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - FAWCETT MEADOWS Page 1 a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land. b. That the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted January 4, 1994. C. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L of the Revised 'and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and other matters. d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9- 605 M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways. e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the Applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns. f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - FAWCETT MEADOWS Page 2 PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this9�- ,Q� day of May, 1994. APPROVED: MAYOR -- GRANT P. KING ORD ATTEST: a WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. -- CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO,) : ss. County of Ada, ) M I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, passed as Ordinance No. 646 , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the 3RD day of May, 1994, as the same appears in my office. DATED this �day of May, 1994. &zf ,a,City Clerk, City of 04wiidian Ada County, Idaho AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - FAWCETT MEADOWS Page 3 STATE OF IDAHO,) SS. �'✓...Sr"' ���aaw County of Ada, �1W \14 1'1 . On this -34 day of May, 1994, b e, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. ,//11111111►,,', SEAL tee', � ; �p Public for aho ra i ing at Meridian, Idah U ommission Expires ,',1j111 � j1111/ 9`t 3663 r= P. ,t;, ry o . u, B01SE 94 IWO - RECO},.; ST OF AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - FAWCETT MEADOWS Page 4 0 � ORIGINAL IgMC V, E-) ORDINANCE NO. 646 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is described in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the real property described as: A parcel of land in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 19, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 19; thence South 00°55,00" West, 1519.92 feet to THE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 00'55100" West, 583.50 feet; thence South 89°59115" East, 1121.3 feet; thence North 00°46,50" East, 583.47 feet; thence North 89°59,15" West, 1120.32 feet to THE POINT OF BEGINNING. is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned R-4 Residential; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning. Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de - annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - FAWCETT MEADOWS page 1 a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land. b. That the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted January 4, 1994. C. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and other matters. d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9- 605 M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways. e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the Applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns. f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - FAWCETT MEADOWS Page 2 PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this .?RD day of May, 1994. APPROVED: MAYOR -- GRANT P. KINGS ORD ATTEST: WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. -- CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO,) : ss. County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, passed as Ordinance No. 646 , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the day of May, 1994, as the same appears in my office. DATED this 30 day of May, 1994. City Clerk, City of Meridian Ada County, Idaho ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - FAWCETT MEADOWS page 3 STATE OF IDAHO,) : ss. County of Ada, ) On this day of May, 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. /J ®®t SEAL ; n � r J'41 at Meridian, ssion Expires ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - FAWCETT MEADOWS Page 4 r �i •��• ~ �� tri t:'' Ja'�h�;ni4�.�F�7t�i}�• 11,x' .. N N _ � u F-00 0 S. RIPTIDE AVE, r" 1 � i to W uW p N 14 N L3 IMP N g s v► o A S. COVEY PL. r z b Q � o O O O m J .o m O C) a S y l0 1 S GULL COVE PL. •� u a ! N .. ♦ .... YVtM w� � N ri f 8 r144..o • ERIWAN—R8,AD — . s s t : 0 • ORIGINAL AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 645 AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 32, TAN., R.lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is described in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the real property described as: A parcel of land located in the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 32, TAN., R.1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the corner common to Sections 31 and 32, T.4N., R.1E., and Sections 5 and 6, TAN., R.1E., B.M., thence North 89043,17" East along the South boundary of said Section 32, a distance of 1791.51 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. thence North 00°01,36" West, 295.00 feet to a point; thence North 89°43,17" East, 110.00 feet to a point; thence South 00001,36" East, 295.00 feet to a point on the South boundary of said Section 32; thence South 8943 ,17" West, 110.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned R-4 Residential; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning. AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - SUMMERF'IELD NO. 3\BOESIGER Page 1 Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de - annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land. b. That the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted January 4, 1994. C. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and other matters. d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9- 605 M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways. e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the Applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns. f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - SUMMERFIELD NO. 3\BOESIGER Page 2 0 • PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this 3 R day of May, 1994. APPROVED: ATTE,ZZA�-1,99R WILLIAM G. BERG, JRU--IVCITY CLERK 1z SEAQ. STATE OF IDAHO,) County of Ada, I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of 7E e' City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE S 1/2 SW 1/4, SECTION 32, T.4N., R.lE., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, passed as Ordinance No. 645 , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the �day of May, 1994, as the same appears in my office. DATED this — day of May, 1994. STATE OF IDAHO,) SS. County of Ada, ) On this r-3rA day of May, 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM Adaj County, AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - SUMMERFIELD NO. 3\BOESIGER Page 3 G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. _ ajos:171777,�� ' �% �� SEAL ry Public for Idaho iding at Meridian, Ida o Commission Expires 940-136F,2 _R J.� BOISE Mix t /a °° FEE _1- S3 OF RECORL- - AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - SUMMERFIELD NO. 3\80ESIQER Page 4 y3 ORIGINAL f# RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN BUILDING PERMIT FEES SCHEDULE FOR RESIDENCES. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian deems it in the best interest of the City of Meridian to adopt Residential Building Permit Fees which are separate and apart from the general building permit fees which were adopted in the 1987 Resolution No. 111, Building Permit Fees Schedule. The Residential Building Permit Fees are a twenty-five percent (25%) increase, and they shall read as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and which Exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: That the Building Permit Fees Schedule set forth in Exhibit "A" is hereby adopted, and incorporated herein as if set forth in full, which includes a twenty-five percent (25%) increase; that Sjrvv�.. these fees shall be effective on the day of , 1994; that the Building Permit Fees for all building other than residential shall be as adopted in Resolution 111 in 1987. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO this day of May, 1994. APPROVED: ATTEST: WILLIAM G. BERG, JR - CITY CLERK • EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF MERIDIAN BUILDING PERMIT FEES VALUATION PERMIT FEE VALUATION PERMIT FEE 100-500 16.00 29,001-30,000 245.00 501-600 18.00 30,001-31,000 250.50 601-700 20.00 31,001-32,000 256.00 701-800 22.00 32,001-33,000 262.00 801-900 22.50 33,001-34,000 267.50 901-1,000 25.50 34,001-35,000 272.50 1,001-1,100 27.50 35,001-36,000 278.50 1,101-1,200 29.00 36,001-37,000 284.50 1,201-1,300 31.00 37,001-38,000 290.00 1,301-1,400 33.00 38,001-39,000 295.50 1,401-1,500 35.00 39,001-40,000 301.00 1,501-1,600 37.00 40,001-41,000 307.00 1,601-1,700 38.50 41,001-42,000 312.50 1,701-1,800 40.50 42,001-43,000 318.00 1,801-1,900 42.50 43,001-44,000 323.50 1,901-2,000 44.50 44,001-45,000 329.50 2,001-3,000 52.00 45,001-46,000 335.00 3,001-4,000 59.50 46,001-47,000 340.50 4,001-5,000 67.00 47,001-48,000 346.00 5,001-6,000 74.50 48,001-49,000 352.00 6,001-7,000 82.00 49,001-50,000 357.50 7,001-8,000 89.50 50,001-51,000 361.00 8,001-9,000 97.00 51,001-52,000 365.00 9,001-10,000 106.00 52,001-53,000 368.50 10,001-11,000 112.00 53,001-54,000 372.50 11,001-12,000 119.50 54,001-55,000 376.00 12,001-13,000 127.00 55,001-56,000 380.00 13,001-14,000 134.50 56,001-57,000 383.50 14,001-15,000 142.00 57,001-58,000 387.50 15,001-16,000 149.50 58,001-59,000 391.00 16,001-17,000 157.00 59,001-60,000 395.00 17,001-18,000 164.50 60,001-61,000 398.50 18,001-19,000 172.00 61,001-62,000 402.50 19,001-20,000 179.50 62,001-63,000 406.00 20,001-21,000 187.00 63,001-64,000 410.00 21,001-22,000 194.50 64,001-65,000 413.50 22,001-23,000 202.00 65,001-66,000 420.00 23,001-24,000 209.50 66,001-67,000 423.50 24,001-25,000 217.00 67,001-68,000 427.50 25,001-26,000 223.00 68,001-69,000 431.00 26,001-27,000 228.00 69,001-70,000 435.00 27,001-28,000 234.50 70,001-71,000 438.50 28,001-29,000 239.50 71,001-72,000 442.50 VALUATION PERMIT FEE 72,001-73,000 446.00 73,001-74,000 450.00 74,001-75,000 453.50 75,001-76,000 457.50 76,001-77,000 461.00 77,001-78,000 465.00 78,001-79,000 468.50 79,001-80,000 475.00 80,001-81,000 480.00 81,001-82,000 485.00 82,001-83,000 490.00 83,001-84,000 495.00 84,001-85,000 500.00 85,001-86,000 505.00 86,001-87,000 510.00 87,001-88,000 520.00 88,001-89,000 525.00 89,001-90,000 530.00 90,001-91,000 535.00 91,001-92,000 540.00 92,001-93,000 545.00 93,001-94,000 550.00 94,001-95,000 555.00 95,001-96,000 560.00 96,001-97,000 565.00 97,001-98,000 570.00 98,001-99,000 575.00 99,001-100,000 578.50 100,000 + 3.75 For Each Additional 1,000 or Fraction Thereof. 0 ORIGINAL RESOLUTION NO. 154 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN BUILDING PERMIT FEES SCHEDULE FOR RESIDENCES. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian deems it in the best interest of the City of Meridian to adopt Residential Building Permit Fees which are separate and apart from the general building permit fees which were adopted in the 1987 Resolution No. 111, Building Permit Fees Schedule. The Residential Building Permit Fees are a twenty-five percent (25%) increase, and they shall read as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and which Exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: That the Building Permit Fees Schedule set forth in Exhibit "A" is hereby adopted, and incorporated herein as if set forth in full, which includes a twenty-five percent (25%) increase; that these fees shall be effective on the 1st day of June, 1994; that the Building Permit Fees for all building other than residential shall be as adopted in Resolution 111 in 1987. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO this 3rd day of May, 1994. APPROVED: r ""WS T P. KINGSF RD ,fp q. ATTEST: LIAM G. BERG, JR. VCZtY CLERK EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF MERIDIAN BUILDING PERMIT FEES VALUATION PERMIT FEE VALUATION PERMIT FEE $100-500 $ 16.00 $29,001-30,000 $245.00 501-600 18.00 30,001-31,000 250.50 601-700 20.00 31,001-32,000 256.00 701-800 22.00 32,001-33,000 262.00 801-900 22.50 33,001-34,000 267.50 901-11000 25.50 34,001-35,000 272.50 1,001-1,100 27.50 35,001-36,000 278.50 1,101-1,200 29.00 36,001-37,000 284.50 1,201-1,300 31.00 37,001-38,000 290.00 1,301-1,400 33.00 38,001-39,000 295.50 1,401-1,500 35.00 39,001-40,000 301.00 1,501-1,600 37.00 40,001-41,000 307.00 1,601-1,700 38.50 41,001-42,000 312.50 1,701-1,800 40.50 42,001-43,000 318.00 1,801-1,900 42.50 43,001-44,000 323.50 1,901-2,000 44.50 44,001-45,000 329.50 2,001-3,000 52.00 45,001-46,000 335.00 3,001-4,000 59.50 46,001-47,000 340.50 4,001-5,000 67.00 47,001-48,000 346.00 5,001-6,000 74.50 48,001-49,000 352.00 6,001-7,000 82.00 49,001-50,000 357.50 7,001-8,000 89.50 50,001-51,000 361.00 8,001-9,000 97.00 51,001-52,000 365.00 9,001-10,000 106.00 52,001-53,000 368.50 10,001-11,000 112.00 53,001-54,000 372.50 11,001-12,000 119.50 54,001-55,000 376.00 12,001-13,000 127.00 55,001-56,000 380.00 13,001-14,000 134.50 56,001-57,000 383.50 14,001-15,000 142.00 57,001-58,000 387.50 15,001-16,000 149.50 58,001-59,000 391.00 16,001-17,000 157.00 59,001-60,000 395.00 17,001-18,000 164.50 60,001-61,000 398.50 18,001-19,000 172.00 61,001-62,000 402.50 19,001-20,000 179.50 62,001-63,000 406.00 20,001-21,000 187.00 63,001-64,000 410.00 21,001-22,000 194.50 64,001-65,000 413.50 22,001-23,000 202.00 65,001-66,000 420.00 23,001-24,000 209.50 66,001-67,000 423.50 24,001-25,000 217.00 67,001-68,000 427.50 25,001-261000 223.00 68,001-69,000 431.00 26,001-27,000 228.00 69,001-70,000 435.00 27,001-28,000 234.50 70,001-71,000 438.50 28,001-29,000 239.50 71,001-72,000 442.50 • VALUATION PERMIT FEE $72,001-73,000 $446.00 73,001-74,000 450.00 74,001-75,000 453.50 75,001-76,000 457.50 76,001-77,000 461.00 77,001-78,000 465.00 78,001-79,000 468.50 79,001-80,000 475.00 80,001-81,000 480.00 81,001-82,000 485.00 82,001-83,000 490.00 83,001-84,000 495.00 84,001-85,000 500.00 85,001-86,000 505.00 86,001-87,000 510.00 87,001-88,000 520.00 88,001-89,000 525.00 89,001-90,000 530.00 90,001-91,000 535.00 91,001-92,000 540.00 92,001-93,000 545.00 93,001-94,000 550.00 94,001-95,000 555.00 95,001-96,000 560.00 96,001-97,000 565.00 97,001-98,000 570.00 98,001-99,000 575.00 99,001-100,000 578.50 100,000 + $ 3.75 For Each Additional 1,000 or Fraction Thereof. • Kingsford: This is , inform you in writir• if you choose to, you have the right to a pre—determination hearing at 7:30 P.M. 0.5/Q3./1.9!4 before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and defend the claim made by the City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain 05/11/94 counsel. This service will be discontinued on resent who unless payment is received in full:. Is there anyone p wishes to contest their water, sewer and trash delinquency? No response. Kingsford: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have - the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn off list i s $. 11,201.78 I RECEIVED MAY - ' ISSA my OF mEkiWAN