Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994 07-05. ~.1 ~ .. `, i 1 ~ \ 4 y ~~~ . h MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL '~ AGENDA TUESDAY, JULY 5, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. CI~~~~TY COUNCIL CFIAM~BERS MIfVUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETtNG HELD JUNE 21, 1994: MiNUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD JUNE 28, 1994: 'i . TASK FORCE ON YOUTH;I- BOISE MAYOR BRENT COLES: 2. TABLED AT JUNE 21, 199:4 MEETING: LEASE AGREEMENT WITH KEN HAMILTON PRESENTATIONS: (TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 2, 1994j ;~ 3. TABLED AT JUNE 21, 199.4 MEETING: LID ORDINANCE - GLENNFIELD: (TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 2, 1994) ~~ 4. TABLED AT JUNE 21, 1994 MEETING: LID ORDINANCE-PHASE 2 DOWNTOWN: (TABLED UNTIL~AUGUST 2, 1994) 5. TABLED AT JUNE 21, 199~4 MEETING: FINCH CREEK FINAL PLAT( TABLED FOR CC&R'S REVISION) (TABLED UNTIL JIJLY 19, 1994) 6. TAB~ED AT JUNE 21, 1994 MEETING: TURTLE CREEKANNEXATfON AfVD ZONING REQUEST (TABLED DUE TO 5 ACRE ADJACENT PARCEL) (APPROVE FINDINGS OF FACT ~1ND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; CITY ~ ATTORNEY TQ ~REPARE AND ORDINANCE) 7. ORDfNANGE #655 - FiRE ILIGHT ESTATES ANNEXATION: (APPROVED) ,I 8. ORD~NANCE #656 - WES.T ONE REZONE: (APPROVED) , 9. FINAL PLAT: CROSSROADS SUBDIVISION NO. 3, 44 LOTS BY CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AND HUBBLE ENGINEERING: (TABLED UNT1L JULY 19, ~. 1994) I 40. FINAL PLAT: THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 3, 52 Lf~TS BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT~, INC.: (APPROVED) li I~ 1 1 4I ~ ~ V ( 11. PUBLIC HEARING VARIANCE REQUEST BY HANDY WAR~HOUSING: (CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSiONS OF LAW) 12. PUBLIC HEARING: VARIA~NCE REQUEST BY MICHAEL AND SUE CLARKE: (CITI( A7°~ORNEY TO PREPARE FiNDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF L~W~)~ ~~ 1'3. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BEDFORD PLACE SIiBDIVISION BY BRIGHTON CORPORATION AND HUBBLE ENGFNEERING: (,TABLED UNTIL JULY 19,1994) ,~ 14. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING BY G.L. VOIGT: (APPROVE FlNDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE ORDINAtVCE) ~~t 15. PU$LIC HEARING: REQU;EST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONTNG BY ST. LUKE'S REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: (APPROVE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE ORDINANCE) ,I 16. TONY BOHNER: SEWER; EASEMENT MAINTENANCE ROAD - LANSBURY LANE SUBDIVISI;ON (CHRIS WfLLIAMS): (CITY TO SEND LETTER) ~ 17. J.GIBSON : EXTENSION F;OR APPROVAL OF KASTLE FALLS/ VALERI PLAC:E #2: (APPROVED ONE YEAR EXTENSION) 18. SHEILY DOTY - REQUEST FOR HOOK UP TO WATER AND S~WER: (APPROVED WI ~H CONDITIONS) ., ~ 19. WATER/ SEWER/ TRASH.; DEUNQUENCIES: (APPROVED) ~~I 20. APPROVE BILLS: (APPROVED) 21': EXECUTIVE SE; 1994) 22. DEPARTMEN`T A. BOB COR JRIGHT LAWSUIT: (TABLED liNTiL JULY 19, PROPERTY: ~ ''~ • M The regular meeting of the Me~ridian City Council was called to order by Mayor Grant Kingsford at 7:30 P.M.: I Members Present: Walt Morrow, Max Yerrington, Bob Corrie: h~ Members Absent: Ron Totsma:j ~ ',I Others Present: Will Berg, Wayn~e Crookston, Gary Smith, Shari Stiles, Bruce Borup, Lynn Thomas, Ronald Thomas, Gle ~n Ward, Mr.& Mrs, Rose, Lawrence Rackham, Wayne Forrey, A.J. Bohner, Mayor Brent Coles, Vaughn Kileen, Phylfis Sawyer, Mary Pat Joseph, Tracie Everson, Gary Lee, JohnlSlagle, Clave Handy, Michaei Clarke, Jim M~rkle, Chris Williams, J. Gibson: MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEE;TING HELD JUNE 21, 1994: Kingsford: Are there any corrections to those minutes? Entertain a motion to approve. Morrow: So moved Yerrington: Second ~ ~il Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second ,by Max to approve the June 21, 1994 minutes, all those in favor? Opposed? ,~ MOTtON CARRIED: All Yea FI ~ MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETI~NG HELD JUNE 28, 1994: Kingsford: You have reviewedl~~those minutes. ~~ Corrie: Mr. Mayor,l move that,,they be approved. ,;~ Yerrington: Second ,~ ~ Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Max to approve the Specia( meeting of June 28, all those in favor? Opposed? ` MOTION CARRIED: Alt Yea ; ~; (TEM #1: TASK FORCE ON YOUTH - 601SE MAYOR BRENT COLES: ~I Kingsford: Mayor Coles at this time we will tum the podium over to you and thank you very much for coming out. ~ i; ~I . ~` • Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 2 Coles: Mayor Kingsford, memb ~cs of the Council, Citizens of the City of Boise thank you very much for inviting our Task Force to come here this evening. We appreciate the opportunity to be here this evening and we promise just to take a few minutes and recognize the amount of business you have before you. We felt that the youth of our valley, our region and cities were of most importance to us and as you felt fhe pressures of the growth and the pressures of the growth and crime and looking at our youth and the opportunities that we have and also the challenges that we have placed before us. We set up a task force, we had over 40 members of our community frankly come together, Terry Cluver the Meridian Princip~al was one of those task force members, throughout the area came together and reviewed what we felt some of the needs of our communities are. That is why we are here this evening to present fhe Task Force recommendations to you. They spent about 4 months m~eeting together in subcommittees, we have with us fhis evening Sheriff Vaughn Kileen who chaired our Juvenile Justice Committee, we also have Phyllis Sawyer who worked on~our Education Committee, Mary Pat who is part of the Family and Neighborhood Committee, and Terry Everson on our Community Providers Committee. They would I'ike to ~ake just a couple minutes of your time each of them and give you some ideas of what came out of that task force and in the meantime I will pass these up to you. ? . Kingsford: Thank you very Kileen: Mr. Mayor and memb brief as I was told to be very bri~ Committee. And in essence aft~ wide perspective and becaus~ flow in another area of the Cour that is that our CriminaF JustiG fhey get involved with troubls offense fcom the time the chilc often, if you get an offender whc are dealing with when they.adju made is to slow this bottleneck way the Fourth Judicial Distri decision yet about where they s area. But with that the courts double the size of our facitity, b I am sure you have all heard State and the County on this is to that and f believe that based wilt probably see a bond issue < for somewhat in the neiqhborl Mayor Coles. rs of the Gity Council, citizens of Meridian, I will be very ~. t chaired the Juvenile Criminal Justice Committee Sub- 'studying our problem, we tried to study it from a County everything that flows in one area of fhe County tends to y. One of the things that we recognized very quickly and system is overloaded in terms of dealing with kids once Right now it is taking about 200 days to adjudicate an comes into custody and he is through the process. And is a multiple offender they tend to forget which crime they icate it. So,, one of the strong recommendations that we hat we need to have another Juvenile Judge, and by the t does have a new judge on line, they haven't made a ~ going to put him yet, I hope they put him in the Juvenile ieed additional staff prosecutors and holding facilities to cause right now it is maxed out on a continual basis and bout the bickering that goes back and' forth befinreen the ue. So, (inaudible) that there are various costs attached pon the preliminary studies that this group made that you id corning up fairly soon on the Juvenile Detention facility 5od of a million and a haff dollars to double the capacity • 4~ . Meridian City Council !~ i July 5, 1994 ~I Page 3 ~ over there. Getting away from that end, we started taking a look at relationships between the local level and the State level Right now I am sure you are aware that the legislature has also established a sub-committee which we will be working closely with, with a continuation of this group to develop better relationships and also hopefully come up with a new system statewide that wilU,~be more effective and efficient dealing with the kids. And' thirdly, again I encourage eaah and everyone of you when you have the time to look at this because I am just doing a broa~d, rush, overview of this. Thirdly, we took a look at the various law enforcement agencies and systems within fhe County and we felt that if we couCd standardize sorne of the~~approaches with deafing with kids such as how maybe various agencies deal with drink~ng parties, how we deal with curfew in terms of taking a look at our various ordinances;;and see if we can standardize those so kids understand what fhe rules are and also Law enforcement can take kind of team work approach and standardize these various processes. With that f would be more than happy to answer any brief questions you have or I will turn it over to the next individual in line. ;~ Kingsford: Any questions for tfie Sheriff? ,~~ Kileen: Thank you very much ~r. Mayor. ~,i Sawyer: Mayor Kingsford and members of the Council, my name is Phyllis Sawyer, I did not chair the Education Committee, it was chaired by a School District person from the Boise School District,. Dr. Hartely and Terry Cluever from Meridian was on my committee and I just want to compliment yo; on the input fhat she was able to give to the committee, she was very vafuable with her insights so you to be commended for that. Our recommendations, because we are fhe Education Committee dealt primarily with fhe educational situation, schools that kind of thing. I am on page 15 if some of you want to follow along with me. This first relcommendation that we had to was to increase the safety and security in fhe schools an~d in that we talked about expanding the ESRO Payada Resource Officer program in:~ Boise and in Meridian and Kuna. Our long range recommendation was to add 6",of those elementary Payada ESRO officers to the Boise Schools and 4 to fhe Meridian and Kuna Schools. Some of those as you may know have been added, there will be an in~crease of one SRO to the Meridian School District and 2 SRO's and a sergeant to fhe Boise Sehool District. Those have been funded already. We also falked about developing a'nonymous central crime hotline for schools and that was put in there with the expectation fhat a lot of time kinds have things that they do want to ceport but~they don't report themu~because they are not anonymous so we thought that was something for us to look at. We talked about increasing the sharing of information on at risk youth between schools and we talked about that because as a youth transfers to one school to another most of fhe time the school that he or she is going into are not allowed to have any information on why~'the child was expelled from school' in fhe first place and that doesn't tend to help the school or child or anybody. So, we think that should be looked • ~ ~ Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 4 at. We talked about integrating community agencies into the schools to facilitate a continue of services between ~~agencies. What we were talking about there was just reducing barriers so the schools were rnore open to parents, to the community. Sometimes schools are kind of threatening ta some families and we talked about maybe piloting a program at one of the alternative schools where there could be representatives from fhe School Resource Officer, Health4~ nd Welfare maybe a probation officer a City rec person to provide a lot of services aIC in one ptace. We talked about court directed enforcement of mandatory attendance and fa,mily accountability for that for kids that are expelled from schools. And school people Terry Cluever and Dr. Hartely both said that they don't like to expel kids from school but that,they are both responsible for doing that and the problem is that even though schools are available, alternative schools are available, the schools have no controt over that. So~ what we recommended was that there be some court d'irected enforcement so that kids would have to either do community service and go to class at night or go to classes d`uring fhe day, something fhat would keep the kids off the street. Once they are kicked out they are on the streets and they get into troubfe and then the snowball just rolls. We also °supported some of the additional recommendations from some of the other committees, o~'ne of those was simply expanding the use of schools for Y-balt programs, computer education, parent education that kind of thing, We didn't see any major cost of that, maybe some school supervision cost but if alf the schools participated and agencies would~donate their time we could probably do a lot in all of our communities. We talked abouf,lsupporting, you will hear a litfle bit about it, an ongoing Youth Commission. We are planning to establish a Youfh Commission at least in the Boise are~ and would certainly~welcome the participation of Kuna and Meridian on that Youth Commission. With the rdea that there would be youth representation and adult representation to see what if is tiiat kids want and' what it is that kids need and we are also asking that there be a person hi~ed to oversee that Youth Commission to make sure that it continues on and it really does~follow the recommendations and sees that some things are implemented. We supported other recommendations to teach conflict resolution to kids beginning at kindergarten tevel. We supported z~ro tolerance policies for weapons, drugs, alcohol, vandaNsm in schools. Tighter security measures as they related to school and crime issues and we also ~supported the establishment of a media school channet something that would reaNy focu:s on the good things that kids do because the newspaper and televis'ron tend to focus a lot on the things that kids do that aren't so good. We think fhere are ~nore kids out ther'e ~ doing good things but we just don't talk about it. Any quesfions that f can answer fory~you? Kingsford: Questions for Ms. S~awyer? ~~ Sawyer: Thank you ;i a~ Joseph: Mayor Kingsford; members of the Council, I am Mary Pafi Joseph a member of the ~~ r ~~i ~ ,a , " ~~ ~ ~~ ~ Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 5 Downtown Boise Asso~iation,n on the committee of the Family and Neighborhood Committee. I am on page 8 with some of ou~ recommendations and I will just highlight then because it will take me too ~ong to go through each one of them. On fhe Family and Neighborhood Committee we d~d a lot of research on what kids were doing after school hours and one of the recommendations that we came up with is the Catch them White they are Young program which has b1een used in other school ~districts around the country. It is based on the discretionary after schoot hours of kids grades 4 to 6 and it has the estimated cost there. We are go;ng to try to keep going with the Mayor's Task Force and recommending that the Catch then While they are Young pcogram is started and continued pretty inexpensively per child per week. Another thing that we came up with was the successfut bear program that is in other school districts that we want to get started in Boise and wholeheartedly like to~see the Meridian School District get that into place. Also encourage the locaf churches to~ allow the activities to take part in fheir facilities. A lot of time was spent trying to find out if the schools were being used to full capacity for after schoof hour functions and came ,to find' out fhat they were in fact being used to full capacity for a lot of the use was for adult programs rather than youth programs. So we want to put the priority back into youth and~have the schools and churches be used primarily by the youth. Also encourage public facilities, a law enforcement facility that is being built here in Meridian, to be used primarily by th,e youth functions, the private facilities being open to youth so that #hey will have some place to go and something to do, both organized and unorganized functions. A couple of the ofher ones were again the Youth commission so that they will work hand in hand with the youth advoaate through the school district. probably, having a the kids having someone to say what they want, what their needs are and having an opportunity to talk to somebody and higher capacities to get those things through. A couple of the items that were recommended really don't have an estimated cost such as the Year of fhe Family;l that is one thing that we want to encourage through the use of businesses and things like the River Festival and important public things that in the public eye to establish that. So, the family will be more visible to the public eye and realize the importance of our most imp;ortant resource is our youth and we need to take care of it. Are there any questions? ~l '~i Kingsford: Any quesfions? Thank you Mary. Everson: Good evenin , m na~me is Tracie Everson 1 am the Director of Hayes Shelter 9 Y Home in Boise, f chaired' the,'~Community Provider sub-committee. As a provider of services to youth for the tast 14 years where t worked we came from the perspective of looking at what kids at risk need to grow up healthy and strong and with the kinds of support that they need. Believin'g that if you provide for youth, all the things fhat they need to grow up into healthy citizen's you will minimize the negafive activifies that kids will engage such as juvenile crime a~d gang activity and that sort of thing. So we started with the premise that to provide them;~with everything we won't have as many problems. So, we ~~ ~ ~.I ri I ~.~ - • yl • Meridian City Council 4~ July 5, 1994 'I Page 6 looked and tried to identify wha~ the things were that all kids needed. And we narrowed it down to some basic things, the need to socialize and interact with other adults and peers, to develop relevant skills now and in the future, to contribute to the community in relative ways, we saw that as a real necessary component that a lot of our youth don't have the opportunity to contribute to their community. The opportunity to belong to a valued group that is where a lo.t~find a gang so enticing because it satisfies that need to belong. And the need to develop~'competency. So, if we took all of those things and found positive ways to make sure all of~our youfh had opportunities to have those needs met and the assumption would be that juvenile crime wouldn't be as big of a problem. We took a look at our community and assedssed where we had some things in place and where the gaps were and where those things were in place we looked at what the barriers were to kids accessing ~fhose services:j If they were receiving them in their home and if they weren't they needed to access those through programs what was keeping them from accessing those services we.;~ found fhat there was barriers of money, barriers of transportation. Some of our recommendations circled around removing some of those barriers. As we began to discuss with the other sub-committees some of their recornmendations and realize '~that a lot of the programs and services that we were recommending or thinking of listing out on our list of recommendations were very sirriitar to the other sub-commiftees,~' Our committee was very much concerned with imptementation. We wanted to take advantage of the fact that we have 35 to 40 community members representin'g all different facets of the community that either work with youth, have youth or were conc~erned about youth and the future of the community, And we wanted to make sure that this~Task Force served as a catalyst to future implementation and wasn't just a group of people~that got together for a shoct period of time, came up with a lot of great recommendations~but then didn't get imptemented. So what our committee did was real(y focus on the implementation part and how we were going to go to the next step. So, we only focused~ or~ 3,~~basic recommendations, one was to develop or create a position which we called Youth Advocate position, basically it would be a hired City or County level person who would be responsible for serving as a clearing house or a focal point for all fhe things that afFected youth, fhat were important to youfh so fhat a youth in any situation needed something they woutd know where to go. Right now services are fragmented across the community and our youth in trouble and youth in need doesn't really know where to turn. So, we wanted to create this position that would be responsible for coordinating all the existing servi,~~c.es and makin~ sure that there was good communication etc. The second piece of that was the development of a Youth Commission which Mary Pat has already mentioned, an important part of that is it would be composed of both youfh and adulfs. This meets that ne `e~d of youth to be able to contribute to the community and to be part of the planning and decision making and the belief that if they are part of the process they wilf have more ownership in it and will have fewer problems. The next and final recommendation that we m~ade was to develop and interim committee which would be in effect afterthe Task Force 4disbanded and would really look at resource development , ~ ~i ~ Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 7 in order to fund this position, devefop the job descriptions of the Commission and fhe Youth Advocate position so that they could hand it off as a transition team and had recommendations off to the Yo ~ th Advocate position and the Commission. So, that was sort of the fiocus of our committee in a nut shell. Any questions? ~ Crooksfon: How are you goin~g to decide what, who is going to be the participant or participants from fhe youth on the Commission? Everson: That is one of the decisions fhat the interim committee is looking at, we have sch~duled a half day retreat i think this next week where we are going to be examining the specific nuts and boits of what would be the most effective composition. We want youth who are ~ effected by programs,~ we want youth who are articulate enough and skilled enough to participate with adults' in a planning process. We don't want alt honor student youths but we don't want alt at risk youfh, it needs to be a combination. How we put that all together is yet to be seen. N Crookston: That was my line o,f thinking is that in my experience with students that are going to be willing ta participate are the goal oriented people and the ones that are already succeeding. ;~ Everson: I thinlc it will be a chatl I have been in contact with 'hun~ they look like failures, fhey loo give them an opportunity to shar they have all the things that evei and not everyone can fit thaC r matter of taking the tirne as a~ community a youth friendiy co citizens to say that youth are oi are equal citizens as are adu participation it the community. F parficipants and begin to be mc but more as partners. Thank y Coles: Mayor Kingsford, mei time. As you can see this is a recomrnendations are very sK you we tried to pull the reco City shall do this or that, but have more control over than : example and that is why we r ~ge, working at Hayes Shelter Home for the last 14 years eds of youth who when you look at them on the outside like bums, they look Iike kids who don't care, but if you what is inside and to be a part of the planning decision other youth have. It is just giving fhem !he opportunity, e, but there are some out fhere and i fhink that it is a ilts to engage those youth in a process of making our munity. So, fhat we are really treating them as equal future citizens is really a pretty degrading thing. Youth - and we need to engage fhem in appropriate level of d I think if we can find a way to do that they will feel like ~ involved and hopefully not see adults as fhe enemies, ~s of the Council thank you very much for giving us your r broad cross-section of recommendations. And yet the ~~c. In the very first part of the notebook that I handed to ~ndafions that are City oriented most of them say BoiSe ;e are the recommendations that we feel that you would ; of the others. However, it takes leade~'ship and it takes some to the Mayor and City Council in Meridian because ~ ;i ~ Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 ;, Page 8 ~ , of your leadership and the oppo ~~4unity that you have to provide leadership and caring out and recommending or di,scussing these ofher recommendafions with the other agencies throughout your community. We~ would respectively request that as you accept this report that you review it and maybe se# up a Task Force or within one of your own existing sub- committees review fhese very specifically and see which ones apply and which ones we can work together on as a community as a county and cities in general in this area. So that our youth no ma#ter in which community they live throughout this valley will have all the opportunities to succeed an~d fhe opportunities to be the kind of citizens and that we know we would like to continue to develop in our area. It is tremendous to see the youth that we have, we are very luckylto Iive in fhe area that we live and we know that and our families know that and our youth know tliat. There are also challenges like the youth in Los Angeles arid' other cities have m.any of those same challenges. So maybe we can be successful in this task. And ag; in thank you for your time and I-have a couple of extras of these Mayor that I will give tq you to pass on. Are fhere any questions? Kingsford: Any questions for Mayor Coles? I certainly appreciate your leadership in starting and going forward with this. I have been on a number of committees, I know what it takes from each of you the fime~ and so on of your-~own and I appreciate that very much. f appreciate you coming tonight and sharing that with us. We wilf digest this and take heed of your words see where it canr~ ork for us. I particularly thank you, I know that Brent is getting our of something tonight and for you guys I appreciate you coming over. ITEM #2: TABLED AT JUNE 21, 1994 MEETING: LEASE AGREEMENT WITH KEN HAMILTON PRESENTATIONS~ Kingsford: Counselor, has Crootcston: It is not yet me and I don't find anything in when that portion of the park ~r fhat gives some indication as to further. Kingsford: If we move along yet been resolved? I have been through the materials that Mr. Berg gave to hose materials that specifically relate to the time period is created. Anything about the grant, thece is one letter fiat the guidelines were and I. still need to investigate that is pace we can not worry about 1994 probably. Crookston: Well, I did have a discussion with Ken Hamilton and he said that he was not in that greaf of a hurry because ~he was still on the existing lease, but we need to move if along for no other reason so fhat we know how to deal with it in the next lease period. Morrow: My question is wilf we; be ready to deat wifh fhis at our next meeting? . Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 9 . Crookston: 1 wili try but I wiif b~ on vacation as of the 15th. Kingsford; Why don't we table this until the first meeting in August. ; Yerrington: # would make that~ motion that we table this item untif the first meeting in August. ,~ Morrow: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Walt fo table this until the first meeting in August, all those in favor? Opposed? ;~: MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #3: TABLED AT JUNE 21, 1994 MEETING: LID ORDINANCE - GLENNFIELD: Kingsford; Is that not done Wayne? Likewise the Phase Two Downtown? Crookston: Both of them Glenn`field and Phase Two I have reviewed all the documents that the City has, it is my finding at this juncture that Phase 2 nothing has been done there that I can see. On Gtennfield tx~don't find anything in the City files that indicates that we are even much further along than that. Kingsford: What is an appropriate time to tabte that to? ,~ Crookston: I would say your fir~t meeting in August. ~ Corrie: So moved Mr. Mayor 'I ~i Yerrington: Second °~ Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Max to table items 3 and 4 until the first meeting in Augi.ist, all those in favor? Opp~ sed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea " "I ITEM #5: TABLED AT JUNE 21~~~ 1994 MEETING: FINCH CREEK FINAL PLAT (TABLED FOR CC&R'S REVISION): `! Kingsford: Counselor report. • I~I ~ Meridian Cify Council ,~I July 5, 1994 el Page 10 ~ ~ Crookston: I have submitted''~ my comments and I have not received anything, any changes, not received any documents from the developer. ; Kingsford: Is there a representative for Finch Creek tonight? Do you have Mr. Crookston's comments. ''~ Borup: They have been addressed and the CC&R revisions have been submitted to Shari and the engineer. ~'~ ~ Kingsford: You might come up if you would and address those questions. Were there spe.cific problems that you had ;with those recommendations with legal counsel? ~ Borup: No, to my understanding the only recommendation was to do a homeowners association. As Councilman Morrow suggested we needed to develop the homeowners association to take care of one common lot and easement lot and a drainage lot that is on the other side of the subdivision. And in those revisions we have provided for fhe formation of a homeownecs ass~ ciation to maintain those lots. Morrow: Does that homeowners association have the capability of assessing dues and assessments? ~;;~ , Borup: Yes it does, in fact~ I hav~e submitted a copy to the engineer and Shari and would you like a copy right now? , ;i Crookston: Certainly if you ha ~e a spare. Corrie: I have a question Mr. Mayor, is it a mandatory homeowners association that they have to join it? Barup: Yes ;; y Kirtgsford: Any other questions? Shari have you reviewed those? Y~ Stiles: (I~naudible) ,i Kingsford: Comments ;° ; Morrow: WeU, given the fact 'fhat our people have received the amended things this evening I don't think if is reasonable to assume that we can act on their advise to us because they have no advise and therefore we need to table it until our meeting on the 19th. , • ~ • (Vleridian City Council July 5, 4994 ~ ~ Page 11 ~~ Yerrington: If that was a mo4ion then I second. Morrow: It was a comment but;;l will make it a motion. Yerringtpn: Then I second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, sec''ond by Max to table this until Jul.y 19th meeting, allowing staff time to review fhose amenc9ed CC&R's, all those in favor? Opposed? `I MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ~ ITEM #6: TABLED AT JUNE 21~~ 1994 MEETING: TURTLE CREEK ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST (TABLED ,,DUE TO 5 ACRE ADJACENT PARCEL): Kingsford: Has that been revie~red to the satisfaction of Counselor and staff? !~. Crookston: I have not seen anyt~hing on it. Corrie: Mr. Mayor, I have a qu,estion, is the representative here. I was asked by phone the other day, is this part of that tower? Lee: No, fhat 5 acres that you'are speaking of is not. There was a lefter prepared by a John Steele the developer on June 22nd right after the Councit meeting and sent to Mr. and Mrs. John Slagle addressing~the fact that their 5 acre parcel would c~eate an enclave and it goes on further to request that they join in in some sort of annexation. And that letter was sent to them on the 22nd and a copy sent to the City. So; they have had that for some fime now. Again, this pa cei is not owned by the Cairn's or Mr. Steele this parcef was deeded off prior to this project being developed. I don't know if it was pointed out, the last meeting the original 80 ac~e parcel of the Cairn's was an enclave in itself, it was surrounded by city limits before this appfication came before you. ~;~ Slagle: I am the owner of this i acre parcel I would like to clear fhis up if I may. Kingsford: Well, let's do that b`y alt means. ~i Slagle: My name is John Slagle and I am the owner of the 5 acre parcel. We have tried to contact John Steele, he has been out of town, I understand he was supposed to be back in town today. I guess this is a good time to bring it up right now, we have no plans on annexation. We don't want to be annexed and we plan on keeping our 5 acre parcel the way it is. We presenfly are rura~ regulated and are taxed by the great State of Idaho, we are rural regul'ated and taxed byl Ada County and don't really have any intention of being :I I • `' ! ~ Meridian City Councii ~~ July 5, 1994 ° Page 12 ~r regulated and taxed by the Cityl of Meridian if we can help. And that is our answer. Any I questions? ~i Kingsford: Questions for Mr. S Ragle? Thank you, is Council ready to take action on the annexation and zoning request,,~or Turtle Creek. ~~I Corrie: Mr. Mayor, what is the State law on, is 5 acres and over or 5 acres and under'? Kingsford: For forced Crookston: It is a 5 acre parcel6the City can annex wifhout a request for annexation if it is totally surrounded by the City;regardless of size the City can annex. Corrie: Thank you Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I think my tF be is that we are beginning to near future I know it has been th we are creating situations with departme.nt, it is tough our Iife what is annexed and what isn' less. It would appear to rne in tr project at a date in the near futu~ small parcels that are beginnin ~ughts at this fime conceming this parcel of ground would ccumutate several of those and maybe at a point in the policy of the .City to not force annex anything but where ~espect to enclaves in particular its tough for our police ~ervices and essential services to differentiate between especially when the parcels are as small as 5 acres or ~ interest of time that we move ahead with this particular ~ as a Council we address the annexation of all of these 'to create problems for our essential services. Kingsford: The reason for the tabling at the last meeting was to see if we couldn't do these at the same expense and not these hanging ovec. Obviously that is not the desire of Mr. Slagle. Probably about 1980 or 1982 was the last time the City forced annexation and it was of a similar nature. I fhink'~we took in some 13 parcels, most of fhem were small in nature that were totally surcounded by the City and your comments might be appropriate. That is something #hat we ought to look at, of course for those people that it would encompass there would be a hearing and it would be noticed. There would be a hearing and that discussion would take place later. Ps there a motion to have the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance annexing~and zoning. Morrow: So moved Corrie: Second Kingsford: Did we not approve the findings last meeting? I thought fhat we had. The only thing that would have been differ~ent would have been the 5 acre parcet annexation, would ~ Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 13 that be accurate Counselor? Crookston: Yes Kingsford: In any event I would P & Z. Morrow: Do you wish me to Kingsford: Yes C~ n a motion to approve of the findings provided by the motion for the ordinance? Morrow: I withdraw the motion to instruct the City Attorney to prepare the Ordinance. Corrie: I withdraw the second Kingsford: Is there a motion to;;approve the findings? Yerrington: So moved Morrow: Second Kingsford: Moved by Mau, seco ~d by Walt to approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law as prepared by P& Z on the Turtle Creek annexation and zoning request, roll call vote. ';~ ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Corrie - Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: Is there a motion to ordinance? Morrow: So moved Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, secc and zoning ordinance all those ~ the City Attorney prepare an annexation and zoning i by Max to have fhe City Attorney prepare annexation favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea a Meridian City Council ~i , • ~ • July 5, 1994 ~ „ Page 14 ~ w ITEM #7: ORDINANCE #655 -;` IRE LIGNT ESTATE ANNEXATION: Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE O;F THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS AN IRREGULAR TRACT OF LAND LYtNG IN LOT 1, SECTI'ON 3, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, fDA~HO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. is there anyone from the public that would like Ordinance No. 655 read in its entirety? Entertain a motion on Ordinance No. 655~ Morrow: So moved ,~I ; Corrie: Mr. Mayor i would also ~~ladd subject to suspension of fhe rules. Morrow: So moved ~,~ Corrie: Second „'' Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob to approve Ordinance No. 655 with suspension of the rules, roll Call vote. ~i ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #8: ORDINANCE NO. Yerrington - Yea, Corrie - Yea - WEST ONE REZONE: Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF;~THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY fN THE C1TY OF MERIDIAN WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN A PORTtON OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHtP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE ME,RIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVfDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like Ordinance No. 656 read in its entirety? Entertain a;~motion on Ordinance No. 656. , c Yerrington: Mr. Mayor, I make a motion that we approve No. 656 with suspension of the rules. ~~ Corrie: Second ,i Kingsford: Moved by Max, seco`~nd by Bob to approve Ordinance No. 656 with suspension of the rules, roll call vote. ! • °, • z~ Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 15 ROLL CALL VO~E: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Corrie - Yea ;~ MOTION CARRfED: All Yea ~~ ITEM #9: FINAL PLAT: CROSSROADS SUBDiVISION NO. 3, 44 LOTS BY CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AND HUBBLE ENGINEERING: w~ Kingsford: The developer calied and requested and followed up with a letter that it be tabled until the next meeting. At this time I would entertain a motion to table that. Morrow: So moved ~ Yerrington: Second u ~ ~ Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to table Crossroads Subdivision No. 3 until the next regularly scheduled Councii meeting, alt #hose in favor? Opposed? ~ ~ MOTION CARR[ED: All Yea ` ~ ITEM #10: FINAL PLAT: THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE N0. 3, 52 LOTS BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT INC.: n~~ ,~i Kingsford: Does Council have ~questions for either staff or the developer? ~,~ 11Aorrow: Mr. Mayor, since we just received Gary Smith's comments this evening, could we have Gary review those comme''nfs for us please. Kin sfo.rd: Mr. Smith could you~come up please? g ~~ Smith: ~llr. Mayor and Council members, I received a response to my comments from Civic Land Surveyors this evening ,~and reviewed those. They have answered all of my questions satisfactorily. If you have any questions for me specifically f would be happy to answer them, :I Kingsford: Questions for Mr. S"mifh? °~ Morrow: So, the 46 items that you have 1isted, basically they have approved all 16 items and will ~comply with all of thos ~ items? Smifh: Yes they have Cou `cilman Morrow, the only question right now is the interpretation of a flag lot and whether or not that particular lot is a flag lot is I guess left ~ ~ • Meridian City Council ~j July 5, 1994 ;;~ Page 16 !i ,~ up to the imagination of the person that is looking at it. It is on that, in my opinion it is on the edge but I am not sure at what point a flag is not a flag or vice versa. It does have some resemblance. ~~ Morrow: What are the issues a~ e there? Smith: The frontage, the frontage on a flag lot is 30 feet and if if is not a flag lot it is 40 feet. So there is a 10 foot difference in the frontage requirements. Morrow: And our position is that it is a flag or is not? Smith: I didn't really have onE person to decide. Like 1 said it but it does have a resemblance widec than a flag Staff would be. is a flag lot. So, I guess that is tl that it is a flag and I just questi~ Morrow: And since fhey feel it had a question was all, I don't know that I am the best s not a flag as you would look at the silhouette of a flag, ~ a flag. The approach to the staff part of the flag is a lot If we are going to look at a picture of a flag and say that a only that hasn't been absolutely addressed. They feel ned whether or not it is. a flag they wishing foc the 30 foot frontage. Smith: Correct, but other fhan that everything else they have agreed to my comments. t think the big one was the numbe~ of lots along the north side of North Sea Cove Way and they have agreed to remove one' of those lots to eliminate the frontage problem that I saw there. , Morrow: I have one other qu provisions made for fencing s when fhis issue was before us k going by my own business we issues. And it came to my atten make sure that somewhere thE of site triangles and view quarte opposed to being done by an A~ appear on the plat with respe conditions for that lot. tion with respect to fhe flag lot, have thece been any triangles and those kinds of things that we discussed ~re in terms of noti~cation of adjoining properties. Just e having a tremendously tough time dealing with those n by the experience that probably as a City we need to djacent buyers and the buyer~ of the flag 1ot are aware and fhose kinds of things and it needs to be upfront as : review committee and it would be my desire that those to, or at least some notification that there are special Smith; I haven't talked to them'~about that Councilman Morrow, I think Yhat my feeling as far as the plat is concemed is that the plat is a survey document and although I agree with you it is a good place to put things so the public that purcha'se the lot can see these conditions, but I think also that we don't clutter the plat with too many notes and take away from its primary intent of being a survey document. Perhaps a notice to (inaudible) ; ;~ {~ ' • i~ • Meridian City Council ~` July 5, 1994 ~ ~ Page 47 ~ protective covenants would: be appropriate conceming that specific lot. I haven't reviewed the covenants yet but it could be in the fence section, typically there is a fence section in the CC&R's and it could be spelled out there as to what the provisions on that lot would be or the adjoining lots to provide site for people exiting the lot. On this particular one it may be a defense for the configuration of fhis particular lot, it is not very restrictive (End of Tape) From this 30 foot fron~age at a relatively short distance. That was- one of my questions for their request that it be considered a flag lot. After you come off of the culdesac it flares out pretty fast `and it isn't very far before it becomes a flag itself. I don't know if this was a traditional flag where you had a long narrow staff and fhen your lot flared out perhaps in your case;~tfiat is what you had to deal wifih then you are looking at a 20 foot access way back of of the culdesac for 80 feet or whatever the distance might have been. It would be a lot moce~ resfrictive than what is shown on this particular lot. So, it may not be as a restrictive sif'ulation as you are famifiar with in your own project. Corrie: We can put it in the CC`&R's. Smith: I don't see anything wrorig with a brief or a note in the CC&R's that would address the situation of a fence in ttiat ar;a that is goin.g to be a restriction as far as people coming out of the lot. ~~ Morrow: t think the issue there with these types of lots is not only that but also landscaping. Often times we address the issue of a 5 foot, 4 foot, 3 foot fence or whatever the case may be and then negle,ct to address the issue of are the (inaudible) that can grow 20 feet high. And therefore effectively block the curb appeal of the home that is built there and the folks that are buying there do an oversight on fhe development process and our part (inaudible) trying to have:~ their view or have their house seen from the street or whatever. So, it seems to me like we ought to be addressing that whether it be on the plat or in the CC&R's from both sta~ndpoints in terms of landscaping and fencing and those issues. I Kingsford: I don't have any qu'estions but what the developers amenable to one or the other I guess it is where do you want to place it and require that. I agree with Gary in many respects you get too many notes on the map but at the same tirne t dealt with way too many people that haven't rea~d their CC&R's and put up a fence and that sort of a thing. If we are not too cluttered on~ the map, maybe the map is the right place to put it. Particularly there because the '~ealtors see and they pass it along to the buyers. I think that would be my preference to;rsee it on the map. I agree with you generally. . , ~ Smith: Tom Eddy, the applicant's representative, is a registered land surveyor and I don't know whether he would have any input into that or not but t certainly agree with the Mayor that is the most obvious place, most conspicuous place to put something like that. ~~ i ~ ~ ~ „ • Meridian City Council ~I July 5, 1994 Page 18 ~~ ~i Corrie: Gary, have you done t le computer run on the water service? ~. Smith: It is in the process of being done right now, I don't have any results back on it yet. We are also in the process of re4habilitating Well No. 12 which is the closer supply point to this subdivision. And we would expect that to be done shortly, well ahead of this development. Kingsford: Other questions for Mr. Smith, thank you Gary. Any other questions for the rest of staff or the developer, Mr. Eddy. ,~ Morrow: Does Shari have~ any comments pertaining (inaudible)? ., Kingsford: Any comments Shar~i in addition to those that were on your review list? Stiles: (Inaudible~) Morrow: Question for Mr: For~ey, you have seen the comments from Central District Health, apparently there is a change in storm water management and you are agreeable to that? ~~ forrey: (Inaudible) Kingsford: As I kind of scanned through fhose today I am not sure f saw anything with regard to our development agree~ment of the golf course, is that in there and I just missed it, it is. I did visit over the weekend with Mr. Peugh, who was in (fnaudible) with regard to the golf course design. I asked him if this portion would meet with my slice and he said there wasn't that much land in~ the world. He says it does meet with what they had discussed~. ~i ;I Yerrington: As you start getting a little older it will start taking care of itself. w1 Kingsford: What is the Council~s pleasure? Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I move we Yerrington: Second Kings.ford: Moved by Walt, se~ final plat, all those in favor? O the final plat for the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 3. by Max to approve of the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 3 MOTfON CARRIED: AII Yea i~ ;! ! Meridian City Council " July 5, 1994 ~ Page 19~ „i ITEM #11: PUBLIC HEARING: ~ VARIANCE REQUEST BY HANDY WAREHOUSING: Kingsford: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite the owner or his designee to speak first. ,~~ ~ Clay Handy, Burley, Idaho, wasl sworn by the City Attorney. Handy: The request that we hav~e before you is a variance. The property that we own is in the Meridian Business Park adjacent to, it is on the back side of the park that goes into the Union Pacific Railroad. Currently we bag cement at that locafion, we have plans to expand that operation and~ bag',concrete mixes. To do that we need a higher sifo so we put the mixers and things below the silo. So we need to go up no higher than 75 feet with the building that wiN be encasing~the silos and the bagers. The property on fhe one side of us is an excavation company, the property on the other side is a holding area for Great West Casualty for wrecked vehicles and pet crematorium. t talked with Mr. More at W.H. Moore company who was the de.~eloper, this will be exceeding their restrictive covenarrts also and they didn't see any problem with it. =I Kingsford: Questions from the Council? Morrow: In terms of dust containment. „~ yl Handy: The entire process wiNl~be enclosed in a steel building Iike the existing building and there will be a dust collection system with a fan and a bag house and also the building will take care of any noise ~that might be present. Kingsford: Any further question's from the Councif? Thank you. Yerrington: Can I ask you one ,'question, what are your normal hours of operation? Handy: We open at 8 and close~'~the office at 5 there might be trucks coming a litfle bit later than that. If we were to capture the entire Boise market for bagging these materials you would still only need to run 3 days a week. So there will never be a need for running 24 hours, they woufd j.ust be normal working hours. Yerrington: That is what i was looking at, thank you. Kingsford: Anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony on this issue? For a general location the proper~y is off of Frankiin and East 5th, it sits back maybe a 1/4 back there. Seeing no further comments I wilt close the public hearing, Councii members. u Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 20 ~ Yerrington: Mr. Mayor, I move lhat we grant this request. • Kingsford: I think we need findings. Yerrington: Okay, I make a motion that we have findings of fact and conclusions of law. ~ Corrie: Second ~~ :I Kingsford: Moved by Max, seco'r; d by Bob to have findings of fact and conclusions of law prepared, all those in favor? Opposed? ' 1,~ ~ MOT{ON CARRfED: Alf Yea ;° ITEM #12: PUBLIC HEARING: ~,VARIANCE REQUEST BY MtCHAEL AND SUE CLARKE: Kingsford: At this tirrme I will open the public hearing and invite the applicant to speak first. Michael Clarke, 4098 North Jul~ian Way, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Clarke: We are asking for a v< property and for a postponemen have. So, at first I would like t~ We spoke with John Andersoi (inaudible) wi#h the site plan anc ditch open. And so in the meani address the fhings he has pu1 amount of trash and debris gene cause ar~ additional burden to we can keep the area as clea attractive for people to want to help to keep down other throv- believe to make sure there isr attractive amenity and we woul~ day mainfenance would be an a saying it would be impossible ~ either side of the ditch that the they wrould have. At the time ~ access from the street and hE barriers to them being abte to would need to do. That ea5em the park would be curious and p riance on tiling the Hunter Lateral which runs across the of the paving of the intecior roads of the RV park that we address a few items that we have from John Anderson. ' about this at the end of April and went over to him and he seemed .at that time to feel that was fine to leave that me I don't understand why he has changed this. Let me ~in his remarks. He said there would be a tremendous ated by this facility that would be fhrown in the ditch and iem. We tend to believe in the Disneyland theory that if r as possible that it will serve two functions it would be `ome and visit the RV park and stay there and also it will ng trash. And of course our maintenance will sufficient I t anything thrown into the ditch. The ditch is to be an like to keep it that way. They are talking about a day to Iditional burden because of the activity there and they are i perform the rnaintenance. They have that variance on 20 foot right of way that they have that we have told that ie spoke with him in Apri1 we let him know that he has `~Gan drive right down by the ditch and there will b~ no ~et into the ditch and doing whatever maintenance they ~nt exists and I don't understand No. 2. No. 3 children in av around the ditch which could. be hazardous. There will • u ~Meridian City Council ~ ~~ July 5, 1994 '~ Page 21 ° ~~ undoubtedly be children, however a great deal of the number of people that would be travelling in the RV's are older and their children if they have them are older. However, in the event that isn't the caseu~there will always be people at the park always there to observe the goings on. The c9it ;h runs at less than a foot deep in that lateral, so it is not like there is a huge torcent of water running through there and it is not running reatly fast. And so I tend to think that is not~'going to be that great of a concem but we wilf of course have people there watching that ~at all times. We have, as I said taken these concems up with John Anderson in the past and there seemed to have been no problem. We feel like as people come to this area, this%~RV park will be a lot of people's first experience with the City of Meridian and we want the park to be attractive as possible and to leave a good impression on them. So, we feel like having the water running through creates many things. Nurnber 1 the trees of course that are around it are very attractive and look good, they are nice mature trees. If we tile the ditch, eccording to the contractors those trees wouid probably have to be pulled out which would leave us with a whole bunch of great mature trees that would have fo be eliminated. And which also adds to that effect the overall cleantiness and attracfiveness of the park. Also the water has a cooling and calming effect and I think that having that running water going through there would be ideal, Our ideal wowld be to tak'e and slope the sides of the ditch so fhat it is not a steep thing and if a child did fall in ~'he would be able to get out. But we feel tike it woufd definitety be an amenity to the p~ark and also make a good impression for fhe City and of the area. I would like now to address on the paving. We are (inaudible) RV park that will be attractive and well maintained and not be substandard, state of the art park that people would be happy to come to and; stay in and return to over and over again. We have had some problems in the past and `'I had a contractor that did not anticipate a lot of cost and has put a burden on us in that way. And so becaus.e of that we are not able #o do things as quickly as we would like. However, the park will be grassed immediately and we will have fhe trees planted throughout the park and those things will be well kept. We anticipate good compacted gravel in order to handle the weight of the traffic that would be going through. And so we need~time and we need help of you people in order to put this through and see that through. The idea of the park of course is to have ii well kept and well maintained and cleaned and at this time we would just like to if possible put it off for 2 years the paving of the interior roads. The area around the entrance and around the building will all be paved as it is built. One of the things that I wanted to bring up is that many campgrounds do not pave~~the interior roads and one of the reasons that they do that of course is it helps slow traffic and keep a lot of speed through the park down and of course it increases the safety factor. Kingsford: Any questions for D~. Clarke? ~k Morrow: What size is the lateral, how big of ditch is it? • i~ • Meridian City Council -~ July 5, 1994 ° Page 22 ~ . ~I Clarke: The pipe coming into it is a 36 inch pipe and the ditch itself is. approximately 8 feet wide. I believe it is 8 to 10 feet~lwide. '~F Morrow: With respect to the gra'vef base to your road can you give me a feel for what kind of gravel base fhat is, how much base is involved? ~I Clarke: No, but t think I have somebody here who can, 8 to 10 inch base. ,; Morrow: A conventiona{ road !ix base? Clarke: Yes ° Kingsford: Would that be something you would look to pave over when you do it, when you put that kind of road base down so that you just have to pave over it? Clarke: Correct 'i Morrow: My comment on that, I think that our primary concern here would be support of our emergency vehicles. And I would think that certainly it would have to be engineered at such a standpoint that it would support our fire trucks and any of our emergency equipment. I think that base in some areas would be adequate and in this area it may be or it rnay not be. I would. think from the Gity standpoint one of the things that is of paramount importance to us is that we can provide the services that we are hired by the taxpayer to provide safely for those taxpayers and safely for our people that provide those services. ';~ Clarke: Well, we feel like somE as a(inaudible) that is the size c fhe road is designed to be ab basis. I think it would be able Kingsford: Other questions? Corrie: ~Vlr. Mayor, you ment traffic down but yet in two ye~ Clarke: Yes, and to put in~ Corrie: So, really what we are for the piping and tiling of tha4 am just concemed about the s< of the RV's that are going to be using that park are such a blue bird bus I mean I'rn sure you have seen those and - to handle vehicles of that travelling over a day to day i handle fhe emergency vehicles as well. ed that you would like to see it stay the gravel to slow you want to black top it then. bumps. ~ is deiaying a two year project. As far as the variance ~ t hate to see trees removed we need a lot of them. ! fa~tor again plus the fact that we kind of come of with ~ ;~ ~ Meridian City Council 'I , July 5, 1994 ~ Page 23 '~ a 48 inch or under would be tiled, you are definitely sure that you can get an agreement from Meridian Jrrigation District;;lthat they would approve leaving it open. ~ Clarke: We had that agreement with John Anderson in the past in April when we sat down and talked to him. He said that it~ wouldn't be a problem for him if it wasn't. For them they like to have if tiled but I guess I~ can understand fhat, that is less that they have to clean up or worry about maintaining. On the otherhand you have an amenity there that can be used to enhance fhe area and i fhink. ~ ~~ Corrie: There isn't anyway to til~ thafi wifhout removing the trees? ,; Clarke: Not according to the contractor, I have talked to a couple of contractors already about what would~ have to be dor;n~e. And they said those trees would have to be removed. I Kingsford: With regard to the trash, it is possible to put trash racks so as to remove that part of the problem. , ' Clarke: We had already planned on doing that. Kingsford: As it goes out, likewise then stop the problems that they concerns about with regard to children playing. Are~you amenable to some sort of license agreement with Nampa Meridian to do those th ngs? Glarke: To do? Kingsford: Hold harmless on tfie kids at play, the trash racks those sorts of thing$. Clarke: Yes, I believe so. Kingsford: For my own preference I can see, our concerns are primarily for residential subdivisions to have those ditches taken care of in a safe manner. In this particular kind of e~deavor I think my druthers would be that it is open for the reasons that you have outlined. But I share some of those same concerns as John Anderson has wifih regard to the maintenance. That ought to be your responsibility. ~I Clarke: The thing of it again is Mayor, if it looks ugly that is not going to be a pleasant atmosphere. Of course part of'~our maintenance would be to make sure that there is no trash going into ttiat ditch or remaining in the ditch or around it. And also keeping down the grass and so on that would~a~be there. Kingsford: Any other questions for Dr. Clarke? Thank you, anyone else from fhe public • Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 24 that would like to offer testi hearing. Findings required C Corrie: So moved Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by ~ob, law, all those in favor? O~ MOTION CARRIED: AII Yea Kingsford: Those will be at ITEM #13: PIDB~IC HEARING PLACE SUBDI~VISION BY BRI~ Kingsford: At this time I will to speak first. Corrie: Mr. Mayor, I got a request that it be tabled. • on this issue? Seeing none I wilt close the public -{or? Is there a motion? ? by Max to prepare findings of fact and conclusions of meeting. UEST FOR PRELIMlNARY PLAT FOR BEDFORD N CORPORATION AND HUBBLE ENGINEERING: that public hearing and invite the owner or his designee call' from David and he said he was going to table this, Kingsford: Wel1, we scheduled' this public hearing, we have to have the public hearing. The action is certainly appropriate to table it in light of particufarly of what happened last time. Is there anyone from the public then that would Iike to offer testimony on this issue? I will close the public hearing, ~Council members. Counselor, I guess the findings and conclusions, obviously the same as they were for P& Z. ~~~1. ~~ Crookston: That is correct. Kingsford: Entertain a motion. ~I ,~~ Crookston: We don't have findings on this Kingsford: Oh, excuse me. ~~ Corrie: Mr. Mayor, point of .orde'r, we have here that this is a request for prefiminary plat, don't we have to have an annexation and zoning first. n~ Kingsford: That is the reason (in~ udible). ~ ~ ~ ,, ;~ I would entertain a motion to table this until next • ~~ ~ Meridian City Council ,~I July 5, 1994 , Page 25 ~~~i meeting. ~; ~~ Morrow: So moved " ~~ ~I Yerrington: Second ~~ Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Maxto table thfs until the next meeting, all those in favor? OpPosed? 'i~ ~~ MOTION CARRIED: All Yea , , ITEM #14: PUBLIC HEARING:'~ REQUEST FOR ANNEXATtON AND ZONIIVG BY G.L. VOIGT: -1 Kingsford: At this time I will open that pub]ic hearing and invite the owner or his designee to speak first. ~~ ~ , Jim Merkle, 9550 Bethel Court,;; Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. ~ ~ Merkle: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, I am here this evening on behalf of G. L. Voigt the Applicant. I believe in your packet there is a small vicinity map to kind of show you where this proposal is. ;~~ This proposal is for annexation with R-4 zoning of approximately 97 ~cres located on the South side of Overland right about halfinray befinreen Locust Grove and Eagle Road.c~ The property is one of the parcels of ground requesting annexation to allow the St. Luke's property to be contiguous with the City limits. That will be presented to you later this ~evening. We are presently contiguous with the City of Meridian, city sewer and water will be available to this site by several off site extensions. And we believe this application is in terms with the new comprehensive plan. The preliminary plat for this property has been submitted to the City and has been heard before th.e Planning & Zoning Commission on June 23rd and sent onto the Council with conditions. We will be before.the Council with the preliminary plat for this project I think on the 19th of this month I'm not sure but I believe that is it. The applicant, Mr. Voigt is working with staff, i spoke with'Shari and Gary about issues on thi's project to meet their requirements. We are meeting with the School district and the Highway District to satisfy their needs. We have reviewed the packet the City staff has provided us and we are in accord with both Gary Smith's and Shari Stiles's comments. if you have any questions on this application I would like to try to answer them for you. Kingsford: Questions for Mr. Merkle? Anyone else from the public? Seeing none I will ctose the public hearing. ~ . Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 26 • ;'I Morrow: i have a question~for Gary. ~I Gary Smith, 33 East Idaho, Mer~dian, was sworn by the City Attorney. Morrow: A couple quictc questions on your letter of April 23rd, it says sewer service to this property wi11 need to be by extension of the Five Mile Creek Interceptor project being proposed by St. Luke's Hospita~l. Am I to conclude from fhat, that if for some reason the St. Luke's hospital expansion do~`es r~ot go then the annexation of this is contingent upon them bringing that sewer, the build out of this is contingent upon them bringing that sewer to this location to get service? ui Smith: It wouldn't be, ~fhe development of fhis property would be contingent upon the sewer being developed in the Fiy~`e Mile Creek Drainage area. If St. Luke's for one reason or another didn't follow through ~ n their plan to extend it to fhe point they have indicated then in order for this development to proceed this developer would have to go back to a downstream that is to the existing point of sewer service and extend from that point. Morrow: And they are aware of that eventuality? Smith: I can only assume that tt%ey would be. We do have as of last week, I do have a set of preliminary plans prepared by the St. Luke's engineer for extension of that sewer line and we are meeting at least tentatively tomorrow evening to look at fhat alignment in the field. ~~ (Vlorrow: Okay, rny next question would be is you requested the approval be contingent upon us receiving a positive result firom our computer model analysis in terms of the water, have we,received that? ry~ Smith: No, we have not yet. y We had quite a load of developments that went to the consulting engineer to have them input into the water model for analysis and this is one of the subdivisions. And we haven't received word back from them yet. Kingsford: Do you have any Smith: No I don't Mr. Mayor, we Locust Grove Road that has be more or less adjacent subdivisic boundary of this proposed subdi loop from that future well site develops out there we are goinc order to loop that system back when you are anticipating that? ~ have a well site in Los Alamitos subdivision on South i dedicated to us by the developer and that would be a to fhis one and I do believe it does connect to the south >ion and there would be a 10 inch water line that would to this subdivision. 1 think at some point as that area ~ need to cro5s I-84 with a water line on Eagle Road in Because what we are going to be deve~oping there is . ',~ • ~ Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 ~~ Page 27 ; a situation similar to what developed in the northwest part of town as Cherry Lane Village developed and that is we have ;a long run of water line that is not looped. Now that one is in the process of being looped in the northwest area, but for years it was just a long dead end water line. And the concern in the back of your mind as an engineer is what should happen if we had a bre.ak in the water line someplace. We don't have another route to feed that area. So, I guess as just to plant a seed in your minds that as that area develops that connection that lo;oping connection is going to be more critical go get back onto Eagle Road to tie back into the extension of that St. Luke's hospital will make as they come soufh or as they bring th~e water south on Eagle Road from the Treasure Valley Business Center. ;, Morrow: Will that loop allow usa~o have the fire flows and things that we need as we are getting into the commercial stuff on the north side of the freeway? Smith: It always helps conside'rably to have a loop as fac as supply is concerned. Your supply volume wise is limited by the diameter of your pipe and your pressure, when you have water coming from 2 directions it certainly helps. We are being pressured at 2 ends of town the southeast and the northwest as far as water service is concerned. And those seem to be with the advent of the~St. Luke's project and Mr. Voigt's, Los Alamitos, Salmon Rapids all of those are put#ing m~ore of a demand than St. Luke's in the southeast part of our city. And of course all of this;~scenario is integrated with the computer model and gives us our demands and needs and as development occurs we are going to have the congnicene of what our require~ments are. Morrow: Well, also in this neighborhood because of the Salmon Rapids and Los Alamitos (inaudible) future park and future schook and alf that sizing is figured in that model. Smith: Yes, from the park standpoint, water resources is requiring as far as their water rights pecmits are concerned th~at we nofi sprinkle large grass areas. That theSe large grass areas be sprinkled with water ofher #han dornestic water. Again, the pressure irrigation scenario we are going;lo have to be careful on how these areas are treated for irrigation purposes, l Kingsford: Oth~r questions for Morrow: 1 tiave one question zoning so we d'on't need to disc We are just dealing with R-4 z~ Kingsford: You are talking abc Mr. Hepper with regard to an Smifh? Thank you Gary, any other questions for staff. ~uess we are dealing here strictty with annexation and s anything with respect to CC&R's and all those things. ing. issue fhat was brought to your attention I believe by ght at P& Z's recommendation on that, am i right. I • i • Meridian City Council '~ , July 5, 1994 ,~ Page 28 ; think he put an interoffice memo in everyone's box with regard to that 1500 square foot requirement that all the otF`ers have that they oversighted when they made recommendation on this one. ~l It is not part of the findings but it is part of their his recommendation and it was an~ oversight fhat the Commission didn't make comment on that. All of fhe adjacent properties did and in fact some of those went 1800 square feet. So, he was just notifying the Council that it was their intent for that to be but it was an oversight and they didn't . Likewise Walt t think it would be, since this is annexation and zoning certainly a developrnent agreement comes into play. I did close the public hearing did I not? ~ Crookston: You did. rl 7 , Kingsfor.d: Is the Council prepared to take action? ~ Morrow: Are the findings substantially the same? :~ Crookston: Yes al Corrie: Mr. Mayor, how are Zoning how would we interpn Kingsford': You amend the fi Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would law from P 8~ Z with the amer agreement. Corrie: Second , Kingsford: It is moved by Wa conclusions of Law as prepared Voigt amended to include fhe development agreement with tf , if we accept the findings of fact from the Planning & ie 1500 square feet. to include those if that is your desire. that we accept the findings of fact and conclusions of of the 1500 square feet and subject to a development second by Bob to approve of the findings of fact and ~ P& Z for the annexation and zoning request for G. L. ~quirement for 1500 square feet and to provide for a developer, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE` Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Corrie - Yea MOTtON CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford; Is it your pleasure to prepare an ordinance? Morrow: So moved • Meridian City Council. July 5, 1994 Page 29 Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, and zoning ordinance, all 1 M~TION GARRIED: All Yea ITEM #45: PUBLfC HEARINC LUKE'S REGIONAL MEDICAL • nd by Max to have the Cifiy Attorney prepare annexation ~in favor? Opposed? REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONfNG BY ST. Kingsford: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite the developer or his designee to speak f rst. ' a Wayne Forrey, 52 East Franklin Road, Meridian, was sworn by the City Attorney. ::~ Forrey: Mr. Mayor, could we r~equest maybe a 1 minute break to set up the overhead projector? `I °~ ~ Yerrington: I make the motion f~ at we have a 5 minute break. Kingsford: We stand at recess ~for 5 minutes. (FIVE MINUTE BREAK) Kingsford: Let's call the meetin~g back to order. ,~ Forrey: I have a hand out for th'e City Council. Mr. Mayor and members of fhe Council I am here tonight represent;ing St. Luke's Hospital, also is Jeff Hull a very good architect with St. Luke's and very busy now with the development plans that they are generating. There are also several property~ owners that are here tonight that are combined into this annexation path. f am going to show you a transparency of this area, we will refer to several properties and then I wil('~walk through a concise description of how we got to fhis point this evening. This initially began back in July 1993 about a year ago where the City of Meridian and your Waste ;Water Department identified 2 sewer priorities in the Cornmunity. One was a community lift station out near the Waste Treatment Plant to accommodate growth in the go~f course area and along Black Cat Road, and the other priority was the Five Mile Trunk~ Sewer which is the red line generally that you see up in the northwest comer of this map~! And that has been referred to tonight by Gary Smith in the G. L. Voigt property. In December of 1993 the City conducted a meeting here in the Council Chambers of all of the. property owners that you generally see on thaf map, 63 people attended. Alternafives;l for sewer in that area were discussed and in general • F ~ Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 30 citizens indicated that they supp;orted commerce at this intersection, the c~ossroads area of Interstate and Eagle Road. i4nd the City's objective was to get sewer and water into that area to stimulate good economic growth and tax base for the city. The City then identified 6 property owners generally along Overland Road to create annexation path so that the City coutd get into the interchange area right here. Once that interchange area becomes city annexed property everyfhing around th~at then becomes eligible for annexation and that creates the commerce with water and sewer and then the annexation possibility a lot of good quality', development could occur. Then in February property owners met with St. Luke's and the hospital agreed to pay for engineering and architectural design to look at;!~ preliminary concepts. Now this property right here is approximately 40 acre sife now owned by St. Luke's, this is owned by the Idaho Department of Transportation, these 2 properties here this is the Wurst property and the Thomas property and this property that may look fike a flag lot is the Curtis and Kim Peck property. And then tf~e property ~soufh of Overland right here in the green hatching there is the G. L. Voigt which was the item on the agenda just prior to this one. The property in blue squiggly lines is currently in the City of Meridian, that was the Mary Moon Annexation and that is ihe property that Dr. Clarke was here tonight talking about the Playground. So, that is the annexation path to get from the Mary Moon property through the Voigt, through the Peck, through the Thornas Wurst, State of Idaho Transportation and into St. Luke's. That opens up the commerce then all along the Interchange. In March of this year Gary Voigt requested annexation and then in April of this year St. Luke's and the bews property began a master planning process'~and that resulted in a conditional use permit request that is currently moving through the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission process and I think it will coming to the Cityj Council in a r~nonth or two ahead. The City has really achieved an objeciive here of getting the water and the sewer and that annexation path established, everything is on track and tonight is really a culmination of almost a years worth of work in putting this together. When Royalnce and Associates identified' the legal description of the 1-84 interchange~ this large area here, they realized that the interchange legal description actually comes and touches the Peck property right here. So, it is possibJe to haye an annexation ~ ath from the Moon which is the blue squiggly to Gary Voigt to Peck to the State of Idaho to St. Luke's. However, the Thomas property and the Wurst property have also been~ included in fhis annexation request. So, that is the annexation request that you see tiere tonight. On June 28th, I think that was last Thursday St. Luke's, the Mayor, Gary Smith';and other staff met with Roylance engineers to discuss the specifics of that sewer line. Ttiey are getting a little closer to a design now, they have submitted some preliminary plans~ So, things are working weli here. We have reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law frorn the Planning and Zoning process. St. Luke`s agrees with all of those~' conditions and in the conclusions of law, the staff comments. I should say St. Luke's~hospital, this is not initially a hospital development but that is kind of a term everyone associates when everyone hears the ward St. Luke's, they think hospifal. The first phase ~s a very high quality medical office and support uses, but • Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 31 • al down the road long term there `will be a hospital. (End of Tape) development project for St. Luke's various phases over multi years, but this is what starts it tonight is the annexation. Mayor I woutd be h ippy to answer any questions or Jeff Null also the Hospital Architect. '~ Kingsford: Questions for Mr. Forrey? . ~~ Morrow: I have some with respecf to the large paccel that appears to be Ieft out, beYween the Mary Moon property, what is the status of that property? ~~ Forrey`. That is one of the 6 parcels that the City contacted back in January and that is item 4 on the sheet that I handed~out. That was owned I think by May Trucking Company and at that time they declined to participate in this annexation path. That was the initiaf pathway the city identified. Wtien it came clear that they at that time did not want to be annexed Gary Voigt stepped f;orward and said perhaps if we go on the south side of Overland and annex that gives the path and that met their development objective. That is why that is void right now. "~ Morrow: How large of parcel is4that? ~~ Forrey: I think that is probably 27 acres. ~ Morrow: Will this annexation create an enclave? Forrey: Well, this project here i's still in the county so in that sense it wouldn't be a true enclave. However, I believe, the best information that 1 have is that has now sold. It is no longer owned by May Trucking Company and the new owners have talked about annexation into the City. Gary do you have any more recent? ; Morrow: My next question is co;~ ld -not the freeway be annexed? Forrey: Yes Morrow: And why does this ann~exation not include the freeway portion there? Forrey: Well, it would include, the portion that the State of Idaho describes as the interchange which is the large g'r~een dashed area right here. It probably should include this area right here then adjacent to the Curtis and Kim Peck property. Morrow: Can it not tie into the Moon property? • ~{I • Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 32 Kingsford: I think you have to border on one side or the other, I think we have had that discussion before. You can't annAex down a road strip, what was that the (inaudible) ruling. So they won't let you annex just a road strip you have to border on at least one side. If Mays request it would require of them to annex fhat freeway. Morrow: On Gary Smith's comments he alluded to effect that there seems to be a one acre parcel deleted from the annexation. Forrey: Yes, that may be, Lynn Thomas is here tonight, I think that is on his property, this one acre paroel here, Lynn is tha~ excluded from the annexation, it is inciuded. It migh# be a typographical error in the app~cation. Kingsford: It is something fhat ywould require us to reexamine those legal descriptions. I Forrey: I do know tfiat the legal descriptions for the Thomas and Wurst properties are kind of confusing. There is a lot of, and Gary noted in his comments, so it has to be checked and reviewed. ~~' Kingsford` Other questions for Crookston: Yes, Mr. Forrey can requested to be zoned? Forrey: The Voigt property has has requested .C-G, Commerci Thornas and' Wurst property, indicated that it was an inapprop that the City and the Thomas's a development goals and still mee~ interchange. The Department o1 Industrial I-L zone in the currei Meridian is zoned Commercial State has a letter on file with the commercial. And fhen the St. L zone. Crookston: Thank you Kingsford: Any other questions public? Forrey, Counselor'? give me a detail of what zoning each ,parcel is being ~equested R-4 zoning, the Curtis and Kim Peck property ~I General, I am unsure what the zoning request for the hey initially requested R-15 and city staff comments iate area for a residenfial zone and it is my under5tanding a reevaluating what type of zone would accomplish their the intent of the City to establish businesses around that Transportation has requested InduStrial Zoning, the Light t City zoning ordinance, the other interchange that is in ind that is the Meridian Interchange where JB's is. The ;ity saying they would prefer industrial zoning rather than 9ke's property their request is for Limited Office, the L-0 Mr. Forrey? Thank you Wayne, anyone else from the • ~i • Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 33 Ronald Thomas, 26Q0 East Overland Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. Thomas: I would like to ask qu;estions mainly, I have a couple of questions. When the State came out and put the ov,erpass, not the overpass the interchange they stopped buying property right here. 'They~didn't buy any property west, I don't know how they got all of this area, I don't know how fhey came clear down the freeway here when they never bought any ground to make thejinterchange for one thing. Another thing I would like to ask, I thihk right now the City ~~ouncil has a request for commercial zoning for these 2 pieces of property and I am wondering if these 2 pieces of property are not annexed how can you go down to highway like'you are saying and annex without picking up other pieces of property? I've got another qu~'~estion, to get sewer to our property what is the process, does anybody have any idea how the sewer is going to get not only to my property but how is it going to get over on that side of the freeway? Are there any plans any financial planning or anything set up for t~hat. Maybe part of those questions can. be answered, I would appreciate it. I am for tfie project, I would Iike to see the whole fhing annexed, I would like to see water, sewer to all of it. I think it is a tremendous asset to the City of Meridian and I hope to see the wh~ole thing to go, it looks real good to me. I just had some questions that I would like to haue answered thank you. Kingsford: Well, with regard to y'our first question fhat is one that no doubt the courts will deal with if we annexed it. With regard to the second comment F think you referred to requests by yourselves and the 1Nurst pro perty. In your original request it went through P & Z and this will sornething that~Wayne will have to address, when they heard that the request was for R-15, subsequenfly that came in and you had your letter here requesting fhat be changed to commercial CG. I am not sure Counselor, would that have to go back the hearings at P& Z to change'fhat after their hearing. ~ Crookston: No ~ Kingsford: It would not, your third, question with regard to how does it get over there. We have some money that we have budgeted for that entire line. It is not designated to go in any part of it, With regard~ to getting it over the bulk is going to be borne by those who benefit by it, i.e. yourselves, V{oigt, Wurst, May and so forth, does that answer your questions: ~~ Thomas: The one, (inaudibCe) happens fo be my 1 acre where my house is all 3 of those are on original tax numbers are all in the (inaudible). Kingsford: Certainly as this pro'ceeds when you have that many properties we will be double checking those legal descripfiions. Anyone else from the public? Lawrence Rackham, 1260 South~Eagle Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. ~ ~! ~ ~I I ~I Meridian City Council .' July 5, 1994 ~ Page 3.4 ; Rackliam: The question I had goes further than Mr. Thomas's here. What are the plans of the City in annexing this area in here or the surrounding property here with it? For the area of Eagle Road and Overlan~d and the adjacent properties to that for future? ~, Kingsford: Well, I guess just to stab at that Mr. Rackham, as was stated earlier it has not been our persuasion to go out and annexes without request so certainly we would be considering the request made of us when those come. It is our desire if you take a fook at ouc new comprehensi~e plan that there ~re proposals for those areas and you may want to review those. Those proposals~include a number of things including parks and schools and wells and all of those things. That is addressed but we wouldn't take that up most likely until we had a request from property owners. Rackham: You have no future p;ans though other than your ~I Kingsford: We11, just our basic planning document is basically what any City deals with. If we owned the land we would have more specific plans but we are not in the land owning business. Anyone else~from the public? Seeing none 1 will close the public hearing. Council members. 1 ,,, Morcow: Mr. Mayor, my only qu,~stion would be of Gary and Shari with respect to and I think most of them have been answered. Do either of them have anything further to add to their comments as per their le~ters of April 23rd? Kingsford: Non-verbal communi;cation that I am receiving is in the negative. Counselor with regard to the Thomas and ~Wurst property that the request was for change in zone, that would need to be addressed at the request in terms of preparing an ordinance am I correct? il Crookston: Yes, they requested, it prior to this hearing. 1 guess my only question would be whether the notice of hearing included those. Kingsford: We receiyed fhat on tfie 23rd of June my assumption would be that it was the original package. So, if would probably have been noticed with an R-15 on those parcels. Crookston: I don't thihk that really, affects it since we haven't had any testimony objecting either the R-15 or the C-G. And~ most of the testimony has been reflected a ciesire of a commercial zone there. I don't tliink that is going to be a problern. Morrow: There has been no s~ bstantial change in the P& Z findings of fact and concl~usions? ~, •~ yl ~ Meridian City Council I Ju(y 5, 1994 ~~ Page 35 ~i Crookston: No there haven't. ,, Morrow: I would move that we ~ado t the findin s of fact and conclusions ,, P g as written for P & Z. Yerrington: Second ~" Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law on the St. Luke's annexation as prepared for P& Z, rotl call vote. , ~ ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Corrie - Yea M~ MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ;; Kingsford: I will entertain a motion to have the City Attorney prepare an annexation and zoning ordinance. a~~ Yerrington: So moved Corrie: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Bob to have the City Attorney prepare a zoning and annexation ordinance, discussion Mr. Morrow. Morrow: I would just like to see included in the ordinance the change irt zoning for the Thomas and Wurst properties, I think that the motion should reftect the change from R-15 to C-G. ~~: Kingsford: Likewise is it Morrow: That is correct also. Kingsford: f would entertain a them. Is the second willing to c Corrie: Yes sir Yerrington: The motion is to require development agreements on each parcel. n to drop the second and the motion and rephrase Morrow: In that case Mr. Mayor~ I move that we instruct the City Attorney to prepare and ordinance for the annexation for the parcel known as the St. Luke's project to and including G ; ~ ~ . ~ ~ Meridian City Council ~ July 5, 1994 Page 36 ~N the change in zoning on the Tho'mas and Wurst properties from R-15 to GG and that also development agreements are re'.quired for each parcel as development occurs. ~ Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Wait, second by Max #o instruct the City Attorney to prepare annexation and zoning ordinance~`foc the St. Luke's annexation to reflect the change from R-15 to C-G on the Wursf and Thomas property and to require that a development agreement be required for each~~~parcel, all those in favor? Opposed? ~ MOTION CARRfED: All Yea ; ~~ ITEM #16: TONY BOHNER: SE~WER EASEMENT MAINTENANCE ROAD - LANSBURY LANE SIJBDIVISION (CHRIS WILLlAMS): 4. Bohner: 1 am representing Mr. ~ matter. The purpose as I reques~ was sent out by the City of Ms which basicafly revoked the ac client for instafled on site sewe project. And the purpose is to try what happened. Looking at M concerned that the developer conversation that the City had wit property in which the easement ~n for this access road. And of coun didn't. I requested my client if the had knowledge of Mc. Ftagen's ~ 1994 tetter. Each of you have Project Administrator and Plann you the Council and Mr. Mayor th estate prior to the easement beir after Jack Niemann passed aw< believe this discussion and Wayn will ~notice by that letter that this the sewer through his land so it w Forcey ir~ his capacity as the PI require an easement and require you know that we were opecatin known by the person at the tin requirernent of the City as far ~ hris Williams on the Lansbury Lane sewer access road ~d to be here is based upon the June 2, 1994 letter that 'idian that was signed by Mr. Smith your City Engineer ~eptance letter which the City of Meridian issued to my ~ and water systems and off sife sewer system for this o let fhe Council know exactly what occurred there and ~ Smith's letter and I have talked to him, the City was may have had some knowledge and based upon a i the owner of the (inaudible) the one that owned the real ~s granted (inaudible) that he had not given permission ~ Mr. Williams said yes f did and Mr. Flagen said no he e was anyone else that he was aware of that may have iderstanding and that is what broughf about the July 5, ~ copy of it signed by Wayne Forrey, your former City ig & Zoning Administrator in which Mr. Forrey is telling t he had a conversation with the owner of the (inaudible) ~ granted. You will notice in the first paragraph shortly y, I understand that was in March or April of last year I ~ is here and he can testify to that in June of 1993. You inaudible) estate owner requested of my client. to bring iuld enhanc;e the investment value. And at that time Mr. inner for the City informe~d him very clearly that would he access road. And so the importance of fhat is to let ~, or rny client was operating in good faith that this was ~ this easement was to be granted. Now, the actual s an access easement road did not come about until • i;i ~ ~I ~I ~ Meridian City Council ; July 5, 4994 w~ Page 37 '~ October of 1994. And Mr: Mayor if I could to aid you and the Council we have prepared a chronological list of events that occurred in this matter and with your permission I would like to approach and give a copy to you, we have given a copy to the City Engineer. So, Mr. Mayor. Kingsford: Have you been privy to the one that likewise was prepared by the City Engineer? ~~~ ° Bohner; Yes, I was and if you w;ll excuse my, you will notice I have some check marks on mine, those are ones we inserted in addition to what the Engineer had in his. I think that is important, you wilf notice that~the actual easement which we received from Mr. Flagen the owner of the (inaudible) estate was dated July 6. So it was prior to that time that Mr. Forrey spoke with him in his capacity with fhe City in regards to what he put in his July 5, 1994 letter. So, this person was~well aware of it. Now, the easement was granted by Nlr. Flagen, it was presented to the' City, you will' notice and F think the City Engineer's office I believe (inaudible) Mr. Crooksfon reviewed that on about December 22, 1993, there were some changes that he had'requested with regards to a(inaudible) description other items were put in. But what I think is important here is that the time of the easement then went through the acceptance approval' of this City. The City was well aware of their requirement of an access as we were and my client firmly believes in what he felt with a conversation with the City fhat the !'anguag"e of the easemeni which allows the maintenance of this easement in such a way :as to~'allow for the sewer to be maintained and taken care of would involve and allow an access road. Now, in hindsight, if the easement hadn't been written sure it is much better to v~vrite in there access road, gentlemen, we don't have that in there at fhis time. What I a,m trying to show you is fhat I think from a(inaudible) the easement can be construed as such to require that so that we have the maintenance language. But what is important~for my clients point of view is that once the easement we believe went through the approval stages my client (inaudible) all fhe time, Mr. Forrey (inaudible). Once the road wa~s built, you wilt notice in this list of chronological events, (inaudible) May 5, 1994, that is when we started the off site sewer road construction. We , ~ didn t complete it unti! May 23. What is important there gentlemen, is that to build this road we went right next to where thei~(inaudible) lives. He saw or had to see the gravel #rucks going in there. The final appro~va! of the system was on May 26, it wasn't until after that on May 27 in the evening Mr. Williams received a call from Mr. Flagen saying I didn't want the road. June 1 the acceptance lefter was issued by the City to Mr. Williams, at that time as Mr. Wilfiam's understands it he discussed the phone call that he received from Mr. Fl~qen with the City Engineer's; office in reference to what had occurred at that time and he believed that the genfleman that he had discussed this with in the City Engineer's office and that was Bruce Freckleto ~: And wanted fhe Engineer to Mr. Flagen saying wait a minwte that road is a part of thatk'easement agreement. Mr. Flagen, went ahead as the City ~, knows put a trench across that road' and (inaudible) and says you can't use it. So, fhat is ~I ' ~~ ti , ; ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ; Meridian City Council ~i July 5, 1994 ~ Page 38 where we are now, we built the access road, we felt he knew it all fhe time, we felt the easement as drafted is broad enough. The easement wifh. the knowledge of the City with a access road was required, believe was accepted. I want to clear up fhis concept that I' think the City~ Engineer had that;my client acted in bad fai#h, because we felt all along the (inaudible) had it. So, that leaves us Mr. Mayor and Council members befinreen a rock and a hard place. 1 realize it is the job of this Cpuncil to look out for the best welfare of the citizens of this town. The sewer,~was our requirement, we felt we did it in good faith. Whaf are the alternatives that we can look at in this situation, I guess some of them are 1, we could try and buy Mr. Flagen o°ut. That doesn't seem to be acceptable nor the price can be negotiated that would be reasonable. Secondly, move the sewer but you can't do that the other side is already platted and of course that would be a tremendous expense to try and move that 405 feet at this tim~e. Third would be allow the road to be moved and allow us then to maintain it without the road. t reatize that you have a letter from the sewer department saying that is not feasible. And I understand what they are saying, I will say fhis, i# you look at their letter, ,'`they say it is probably remote that a problem will occur (inaudible) pipe .in that situation. °And althou gh the machine ry for removal of plu g would not be as easy as if you could drive°~right up to it. Again the only time you couldn't drive up to a plug in this fype of situation is if you had bad weather. So, it has to be bad weather cornbined with a remote possibili~y of a plug that you need fhe access road anywhere. My client is willing to contractually: take on the responsibility with the City if that alternative woul'd be available saying if a plug comes up, he wilf take the cost of seeing that it is done. t belieye that at fime if for instanc~e here is this scenario it is wet out there and we need to get it plugged, (inaudibte) that a~person would be in (inaudible) in order to bring trucks or equipment in there in order to maintain that easement. That is what the easement says in that situafion; that would an altemafive. The fourth one I think the best one is and i fhink (inaudible) we believe that this (inaudible) owner came to the City, came to Mr. Forrey and tried to talk this developer into~~doing it. Mr. Forrey mentioned that to Mr. Williams, we have done it, the (inaudible) owner knew that (inaudible) now he waits until we have done it he waits until it has been app~oved he knows that we have sold lots. There are some builders out there that have put their money and time in place and I think it is highway robbery (inaudible). And Wayne knows fhese procedures as well as f do, there is a defense out there called a,(inaudible) no it is not a part of it. We would request that fhe City do not revoke our right fo continue that subdivision. Go ahead and send a letter to this gentleman saying the easem'ent was there, the easement allows up to maintain it, we believe that he was aware of it~ And fhe next step then would be his ballgame in that situation. But I trust the Gouncil wouldn't allow him to hold us up and the tremendous financial responsibility we have in operating what we feel is in good faifh and in essence try and put a blackmail over this council by saying I didn't give specific approval of that easement. NOr. Mayor and Council' members fhat is what we are requeSting this evening and wanted to let you know where we stood and what the facts were as we knew them. • i4!~ • Meridian City Council ~I July 5, 1994 ~~ Page 39 ^ 4~ Kingsford: Are there any questions for Mr. Bohner? Morrow: I think ma be a com"~ ent on m art is that 1 have ersonall looked at the Y ~ YP , P Y project there and 1 think a couple of things here are outstanding. One is that our letter from John Shawcroft as he referred to stated that with respect to our cleaning it. Although the odds are remote, as guardian of the taxpayers funds we need to make sure fhat road and that cleaning mechanism and athose procedures are followed as per their operations manual. The second fhing is:.with respect to the site depending on what the Councit determines tonight, 1 think partial of that solution must be that Mr. WiHiams totally clean the overburden that is on and clearly outside of the easement that is on Mr. Flaten's property, it probably should have been done already. But there is a substantial overburden from the trench that is on that property that needs to be taken care of. I guess those are comments rnore to you in terms of a propo~sed solution, it needs to go hand in hand with that. Kingsford` I think just a follow up qf your inifial comment too Walt is that were this Council to back away from that requirement recognize that you have numerous other easements fihat we have reqwired gravel `;~topping for maintenance that you would be setting a precedent that would be a damrnng one for you. Morrow: Well, from as a(inaudi.ble) I arn not wiqing to, although the odds are remote, I am not willing to put our employee~s in that position of having to struggle and fight against inclement weather. I don't know~~how effect bonding by the private sector might be in terms of cleaning a plug or whatever comes up. And quite candidly, as we will here maybe from Wayne and Gary maybe the altemative number four is the one we ought to be looking towards. ~~ Bohner: Mr. Mayor rnay I respond, to make sure t understand Councilman Morcow in regards to the overburden, t think on advice of Council once the (inaudible) built that trench fo (inaudible) and I nee~d to menfion to you that your City Engineer we have discussed several alternatives, ;'~he has been very cooperative in trying to find a solution to this situation. We have (inaudible) overburden until we can determine what needs to be done here. We believe that we have an easement, we betieve he knows, and it is for his bene~t he wanted it, and we believe that the easement is such that will allow that and we think four is fhe best alternative. What wiJl occur l don't know but for him to sit fhere and' put a trench in and say Iha ha f didn't get permission with the facts as we know them is not correct either legally or m~rally. ~i Morrow: I am sorry, one other~ quesfion, is fhis easement that has been given for fhe sewer maintenance, does it ~comc~de with the right of way easement that Nampa Meridian has? '~~ ~E ~ ,~ r • ~~i • Meridian City Council July 5, 4994 Page 40 Bohner: I have that, reviewed it, it goes along with that, that is correc#. Morrow: So, they are one on Bohner: 9 betieve they are, yes have those rights. Kingsford: Is Mr. Flafen here Bohner: I have not personalty Kingsford: Do you know Gary if evening? Williams: 1 spoke with Will of each other? is what my understanding is that is correct. And they is he aware of this rneeting this evening? him. was aware that we wece going to be taking this up fhis that. Berg: I said I didn't know if he wanted to be here and 1 think I discussed briefly with Wayne when I gave him some;~nformation that this issue was going to be if we should invite him or if we should just t~ke the matter as such with all the information we coufd gather. „ K'ingsford: Well, certainly it would be my recommendation to Council that we take number four and run with it. I wish he was here to get his input. I agree with Mr. Morrow if there is added burden out there t'hat wasn'f cleaned up it definitely ought to be remedied. Crookston: What is the number~four alternative? Kingsford: That is #hat we proce'ed as that if is a covered graveled' roadway and that the City have access to that as it exists. And put Mr. Flaten on notice that his trench blocks ouc easement and he needs to remedy it. Crookston: ! haven't looked at the easement for quite sometime I haven't had a chance to look at it tonight even though I knew this was coming up. Kingsford: My concem is multiple'the several letters fhat we have received from builders, number one that we are holding a~ third party out fhere at bay. Buf I think fhat needs to be tifted if that is the Council's correction and that we proceed along with remedying the separate .of those issues. I fhink'~we have the where with aU fhe force that the easement be observed and (inaudible) of `ampa Meridian's and it be graveled. Morrow: I guess in terms of what t read in the easement, if the easement says that you ~ Mer'rdian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 41 • have fhe right to maintain som;ething certainly common sense and the average person woutd construe maintenance to 'b~e to drive out there with your machine to clean the thing. And you have certain minimum standard of road (inaudibl'e). You would be awfully naive to assume that you are not going to have some sort of road or some sort of maintenance access. ~~ Kingsford: I think certainly the irrigation distric# would have had that if they operate in fhe winter. We have to operate in th~e winter so that would be a standard. Does the Council have a recomrnendation or a motion? Crookston: I guess my concern~ is whether or not in the event we, if the City has to do something wifh Mr. Flaten, whether or not Mr. Williams is going to pay the cost of doing that. ~ Kingsford: You are suggesting ~ o doubt a legal remedy. Crookston: Yes ~ w Kingsford: Would Mr. Williams be amenable to helping us with the legal cost should we incur those with Mr. Flaten? ~~i ; Bohner: We have talked about tfiat of course from the point of view and parf of his answer is no, I understand the concern in that situation. I think we would be willing to definitely look at thaf and to aid in any we can in this situation. We would need to sit down with you and make out a proposal that you could live with and we could live with in that situation. We hope it doesn't come to that and he won't try and take the City on. I wouldn't want him to think that it is coming out of our pocket if he is fighting us to start with in fhat situation if at all possible. But f realize this`!~is a public hearing. Mr. Williams and I spoke out of turn there in looking at that. ' ; ~;~ Crookston: I think his answer needs fo be on the record fhat he said no. ~ Bohner: I think Mr. Mayor what concerns me is that, again and I am an advocate for my client you understand thaf, and in looking at that my client felt he knew fhe road was there, the easement was drafted and it went through the process and I think everybody here must have felt comfortable that if included that or this Councif wouldn't have said it is okay in that situation. We feel that when we think he is coming now and holding this hostage. We think we have done everything w~e were suppo,sed to have done. ~ Morrow: I guess I would hesitate from a standpoint in terms of I would like to see some commitment on your folks part because in a sense what we are doing is that we are taking I ~ ~ • Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 42 on the burden of solving the Flaten and his representativ~ represent. And so it would a commitment that if that han~E Bohner: I think we can work ~ !; ~,oblem here and if we are going to be challenged by Mr. !;~then that is an unfair expense to the taxpayers that we ~ear to me that it would make sense to have some sort of s there is some reimbursement for the City. out. Crookston: I think Mr. Forr,ey wanted to make a statement. Forrey: Thank you Mayor and Counselor, I don't have a relafionship with Mr. Bohner, or Mr. Williams or Mr. Flaten, it just happened a monfh or so after Jack passed away that Chris came in with a subdivision and he was talking about sewer on the south side of the South SJough through !he'Ramon Yorgason property. And it seems like a week or two fater Mr_ Flaten called and I mentioneci that to him and he said boy I sure want that on the North side and that is what started all of this. It was actually Mr. Flaten's conversation with me that if at all possible could the City encourage the sewer on the North side instead of on the south side through 'Ram,,on Yorgason as he thought tha# would be a little better enhancement of the value of his property. And we did discuss fhe fact that if that was the case it would be a permanent easement 24 access with a road, that is something that Gary had fold all the department head's to be on the look ouf for. We have to have permanent sewer easements or rights of way, not down lot lines but we have to have a road. So I was pretty direct with him about fhat and he understood that. That may effect somebody here but that was the conversation honestly that we had. So that is how we got to this point I gwess. ~,~ Kingsford: Any other commentsRlfrom the Council? Yerrin tl~ gton. It wouid be good if we had hrm write a letter for our file. ~I ~ Kingsford: He turned that in this evening or it was faxed over, you should have it in your packets it just came over this eve~ ing or late aftemoon. ~rookston: (t would be my recommendation to have some sort of an agreement regarding if the City gets put to the task of having to go to task on that easement. Kingsford: I am not sure I totall;y agree with that. I think Mr. Williams ac#ed in totally (inaudible) with the City and so on~with Mr. Flaten can be best be determined. I think if we were to go back on all similar things and were to require people that did something for the City there would be thousands of them. I don't see those as being different from this sit~uafion. What f do think we ough~t to put Mr. Flaten on notice is I fhink we are holding the wrong person hostage here. If he ever wants a hook up he damn well befter put that ~ g ~ ~rl ,I ~I Meridian City Council ; July 5, 1994 ~ Page 43 '~ trench out of fhere and (inaudible). I think that is the party that shouldn't get building permits and not Mr. Williams. ''~ Corrie: How much property Kingsford: 5 acres. Morrow: It is my Kingsford: Judging from the Flaten have, do we know'? it is approximafely 5 acres. that it be my best guess that it be in that neighborhood Corrie: f agree, I don't fhink we should hold the whole subdivision hostage. I would like to have some type of, I think web~did get some kind of a verbal understanding that you are going to, if I' am wrong, that you would be happy to work with us, is this correct? Bohner: As I mentioned we, I think our feelings are like the IVlayor's we acted in good faith. We are caught between a. rock~and hard place gentlemen, t am looking at lawsuits from builders, I have 20 lots, 6 of them are built on. I have 14 lots that are committed on option to purchase and so f am here begging I better strike a deal with you I don't have too good of a bargaining position but I agree with the Mayor I hope he won't hold us hostage in that situation, but we have to solve!'~his problem. Kingsford: Just for the record'~it is neat to have an attomey befinreen a rock and a hard place, it rarely happens fo me~! but it feels good. Well; in light of that and honoring the desire that is not necessarily public information I suggest that maybe we appoint one of the Council members to work ~with Mr. Bohner and Mr. Williams to make some sort of resolution and possibly include Mr. Crookston, if you would be witling to do that Mr. Corrie? i;E ;I ~,'I Corrie: I was afraid you were going to say that. ^1 Kingsford: To meet with those~flolks and make some sort of an arrangement. ~~t Bohner: When I say between a~ rock and a hard place I don't mean Mr. Flaten t: think we have a strong legal case I am referring to my other people in my subdivision that need to (inaudible). Kingsford: With that I then request the Councif then drop the gag order if you will the lack of occupancy permits and so forth and then proceed along. Yerrington: So moved ~i ;~ ~ ~~ :i ~ 'J '~ ~ ~ Meridian City Council °~ July 5, 1994 ' Page 44 q~ Corrie: Second ~~ '.i Kingsford: Discussion Mr. Mor'row? ~ Morrow: WeN, I only have a question with respect to the cleaning up of the overburden and stuff that exists on the ~laten pr4operty, how quickly does that get resolved? f Kingsford: I think that needs lo be resolved within the next, before the next Council meeting or there will be anothe'r wifhholding of lots. All those in favor? Opposed? ~~ MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ; ITEM #17: J. GIBSON: EXTENSlON FOR APPROVAL Of KASTLE FALLS/ VALERf PLACE #2: ~I Gibson: We are just requesti ~g a years extension on the plat approval if we may for Kastle FalJs. ~ Kingsford: Any questions for Mr. Gibson? ~',~ Corrie: Kind of fill me in. ' Kingsford: We have a time frame in ouc zoning and devefopment ordinance that requires a certain period of time he is up, against that and is requesting a year extension of that. Gibson: UVe are not quite there~we are a fittle bit ahead of time for a change. ;~ Kingsford: Any other questions; entertain a motion if that is your pleasure. ~I Yerringfon: t move that we exte~d for one year. a Morrow: Second ~ Kingsford: Moved by Max, secontl by Walf to approve of a years extension on Kastle Falls and Valeri Hieghts fd0. 2, all tho~se in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ;; ,~ ITEM #18: SHELLY DOTY - REQUEST FOR HOOK UP TO WATER AND SEWER: ~ Kingsford: Were they not going;~o be here Mr. Berg? ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ Meridian City Councif ~i July 5, 1994 ~j Page 45 ';~ Berg: (Inaudible) Kingsford: Are you guys familiar with that issue? It is off Locust Grove, before they can hook up to water and sewer they need that to be extended by Goldsmith or Voigt? ~~I Smith: Mr. Mayor, Greg Johnson's project Sportsman Pointe the area through which that extension is to occur to get it to Locust Grove Road. It is my understanding that Marty Goldsmith had' an agreement with Gceg Johnson to make that extension in order to serve Los Alamitos and Salmon Rapi,~s. ~~ Kingsford: I think what this Couricil needs to do is certainly if it is your inclination fo grant that sewer and water hook up outside the City to notice that it be a double hook up fee on each and that it be conditioned~only upon the developers making fhat available to them. r~ Smifh: It is not available at this time. Kingsford: The City of Meridian is not going to run one service out there some 800 feet. ,~ „ Morrow: Is that their perception is that we are going to run it? ~,f~ Kingsford: No, they are jusf aware that it is coming, but what I am saying is that we have to preface that by saying it may n~`ot be because this is up to the developer. They may not ever get it there. (End of Tape) So, f think that needs to be included in fhe granting, what they ran up against it is in your packet is Central District wouldn't grant them license to redo their septic system because they are saying: that sewer and' water is going to be available. Well, it may or may Lot be. ~~ Morrow: It coufd be 3 or 4 years before it is. availabte there. L Kingsford: That is a possibility°', 'I Morrow: C don'f have any obje~ction to granting them permission to hook onto the City sewer and water but I do think it ~needs to be double fee and yes it needs to be contingent upon somebody else running t~e sewer and water next to fheir property. f don't want to give the indication that the City o,f Meridian that this Council or any other future Council is going to run them a line. ~~~ Corrie: Mr. Mayor, point of information, do we always, is this a double hook up fee. Kingsford: Any time it is outside fhe City limits our bonding ordinance requires it be a double hook up fee. Entertain a motion to that effect. • Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 46 Morrow: So moved Corrie: Second . Kingsford: Moved by Walt, se'cond by Bob to allow that hook up conditioned on it be a double hook up fee and making it very clear in the notice that it must be run to them by the developers or by themselves that the City is not going to run that for them, all those in favor? Opposed? °~ ~ MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #19: WATER/ SEWER/ Kingsford' This is to inform y predetermination hearing at 7:3 appear in person and be judge~ you sewer, water and trash bill i; discqntinued on July 13, 1994 ui public that would like to contest I would entertain a motion to ac Yerrington: Mr. Mayor, I move Morrow: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, se $16.329.70, all those in favor? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea DELINQUENCIES: ~u in wriiing if you choose to you have the right to a P.M. July 5, 1994 before the Mayor and City Council to on the facts and d"efend the claim made by the City fhat delinquent. You may refain Counsef, the service will be ess payment is received in full. Is there anyone from the heir sewer, water and trash delinquency? Seeing none >rove the turn off Iisf. approve the turn off list of $16,329.70. by Walt to approve the turn off list in the amount of Kingsford: ~'hey are hereby inforrr~ed that they may appeal or have the dec.ision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial Court pursuant to Idaho Code, even though they appeal they may appeal. y~ ITEM #20: APPROVE BILLS: Corrie: Mr. Mayor I move that tFi;ey be approved. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Bob, sec~ond by Ma~c to approve of the bills, all those in favor? i • ~1I ~ i Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 47 ~ Opposed? ~ MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ~ r;l ITEM #21: EXECUTIVE SESS ON: ~ Kingsford: I understand from Mr. Crookston that they have asked fhat this be postponed until next meeting. '~ i Crookston: That was to be a presentation by the Attorney representing ICRMP. His wife had an emergency and had to gq~'~to the hospital, he has to have it continued until the next Council meeting. ~j ~I Kingsford` Entertain a motion f'o table that until fhe next Council meeting. G Morrow: So moved i Yerrington: Second~ ~ , Kingsford: Moved by Walt„ second by Max to table the executive session on the Francis Wright lawsuit, all those in favo~r'? Opposed? MOT~ION CARRIED: All~ Yea ~ , ITEM #22: DEPARTMENT REPlORTS: Kingsford: Mr. Smith, we will come baek to you. Chief ~~ Gordon: Nothing Kingsford` Mr. Chairman of the;~Planning & Zoning Commission. ; Johnson: Nothi~g ~: Kingsford: Shari ` 4 Stiles: Nothing Kingsford: Mr. Smith "~ Smith: No#hing ~~ : °I i I ~~ ~I • s• • ~ ~+ Meridian City Council July 5, 1994 Page 48 Kingsford: Water Commi Mr. Crookston Crookston: Nofhing Kingsford: Nothing sir do you have anything you would like to say this evening? Kingsford: Mr. Corrie ~ ~ Corrie: J.ust one question of Will, the Clothes R' Us that property back there, that was condemned and is supposed to be done, is that by July the 5th, has that been done or what has happened to that. TFie property that no sewer lines, no water behind the old Apollo Cleaners down by Clothes R Us, that has been declared null and void, have you followed up? ' y ~ ~ Berg: I would have to check with Daunt, I am not sure. °j Corri.e: It doesn' t look Iike anyt,hing has changed. ~ Crookston: I can address that, D~unt went down and looked at it becawse the owner h ad told his tenants that they were being evicted by the City because we had written a letter to him stating that he had: a hazardous situation there with fhe hole in fhe roof. When I initially talked to Daunt it was a s'ituation where the building could fall down. Daunt went down and physically inspected ~it and fhat is not the case. And so fhat is not emergent as we initially thought it was. ;j '~~ Corrie: Okay, but there is no sewer and water to that. Crookston: No there is not. :~ Corrie: And is that not grounds fo~r (inaudible) at this point. °:1: Crookston: I told Daunt that I w~ould have to take a look at our ordinances to make sure about that: ~ Kingsford: Well, or ordinances do require fhaf everyone be hooked to city sewer and water if the city limits are within 300 feet of them. 7 Crookston: They are hooked, it has been terminated for lack of payment. Corrie: How can they live there then. ~~ ~i ~I ~i 'I ~~I I !~ ~ ~~ Meridian City Council ` July 5, 1994 °ql Page 49 ~ ~ Crooksfon: They use the facilit~es in the apartment building across the way which is on the same property. ~~ ~ Corrie: But there is no water th;~ere, the sewer line has been cut there. Crookston: No, there are 2 separate meters. 'I Corrie: One of them has no sewer and one of them has no water. ;~ Crookston: I think one of them ,has no water and no sewer because it has no water, the other building t think is in full se~rvice. a Morrow: 1 guess the questiona in my mind is how can you have people Iiving in the (inaudible) ~ , Kingsford: (Inaudible) violafing I%` health code Morrow: (Inaudible) it is Central District Health. :1 Corrie: But Cenfral Districf Health is not doing anything about it. ~ Morrow: Well than we can'f. ';, Crookston: Tliat is why I told Daunt I would look into it. ~I Corrie: I have noting more, I am' going to get called in the morning about. Morrow: Who is calling you? 15 ~ Corrie: People that Iive there. ~~I ~ Kingsford: EnterCain a moCion tol~~adjourn. al Corrie: So moved ~~ , Morrow: Second ,I ~~~~ Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Walt to adjourn, all those in favor? Opposed? ~`;~ MOTION CARRIED: AI( Yea ~ w , , ~ • Meridian City Council ~ July 5, 1994 ~ Page 50 ~~ N, MEETfNG ADJOURNED AT 10~:03 P.M. ~ (TAPE 4N FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) i~ ,~ ATTEST: ~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., • APPROVED: GRANT P. KINGSFORD, MAYOR i~ • a • ;~ ;~ ,MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL ~ AGENDA ~I i y~ TUESDAY, JULY 5, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF MlNUTES OF 1. TASK FORCE ON YOUTH ~rcre~t~ri~ `~ 2. TABLED AT JUNE 21, 199 HAMILTON PRE? ~~ ~~;I 3. TABLED AT JUNE 21, 199 ~~e d 4. TABLED AT JUNE 21, 199; ~~~~ w~~ 5. TABLED AT JUNE 21, 199 FOR CC&R'S RE ~-~.~~ :; 6. TABLED AT JUNE 21, 199`" ZONING REQUE ~~~ro~P .,~/.f' s - 7. ORDINANCE #655 - FIRE=~ ~~~~~~~ ',I 8. ORDtNANC #656 - WES'~ Gc,o,~rovecL- " 9. FINAL PLAT: CROSSROAI DEVELOPMENT: ~ -~a~e ~'L cc~ ~ 10. FFNAL PLAT: THE LAKE A DEVELOPMENI ~~j~ra c~e.d ~ 11. PUBLIC HEARING: VARI Ci ~L L'~r~ 12. PUBUC HEA lNG: VARI c~~ ~~~ 13. PUBLIC HEARING: REQU SUBDIVISION B ENGINEERING: ~~~ ~ 4US MEETING HELD JUNE 21, 'F994: ~~~r~~e~ MEETING HELD JUNE 28, 1994: a~P~~~~ - BOISE MAYOR BREN7 COLES: 4 MEETING: LEASE AGREEMENT WITH KEN SENTATIONS: .~~• 2 ^'-1 ~?ir~. 4 MEETING: LID ORDINANCE - GLENNFIELD: ~~.e ~. 2 ~ ~~y. 4 MEETING: LID ORDINANCE-PHASE 2 DOWNTOWN: Z'`!° /ai~-~. 4 M ETING: FINCH CREEK FINAL PLAT( TABLED VtSION G~~.2 .~'~y /~f~- 4 MEETtNG: TURTLE CREEK AN(dEXATION AND ST (TABLED DUE TO 5 ACRE ADJACENT PARCEL) G~C ~/~~ ~L~'C'O~'.-se~. ~~1~P~G~~.e O'ldih,a~rc-c-e.. LIGHT ESTATES ANN.EXATION: ONE REZONE: DS SUBDIVISION NO. 3, 44 LOTS BY CAPITAL 1ND HUBBLE ENGINEERING: = ~Ti~~ /9 ~ ~Z~ . ,T CHERRY LANE fd0. 3, 52 LOTS BY STEINER ~~~~~d-t iNCE REQUEST BY HANDY WAREHOUSING: ,'y ~ ~Or~e~a-~e~ -~'/-F ~ c f L -NCE REQUEST BY MICHAE~ AND SUE CLARKE: ~ ~ ~jaatie ~/~~' ~` r~L :ST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BEDFORD PLACE ` BRIGHTON CORPORATION AND HUBBLE ~~y~2~ `~. 14. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING BY G.L. VOIGT: cL~Pf-~~e ~~f `l{ ~lC f'-r~-*- %~Z aw~ ~zs~-~--~C l57~o TiJ ~.,.d Gf..2 ve lo~ r,,.~.-~- a~ r.e e s~.-e ~ , ~ Cs ~ G2, L`~ors` e~ ~n ~0 r.e~~z ~-2~r•.~,-..~ ~z ar~~-3L s~~ Zvn-~~g C/ ~ 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. ~ PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING BY ST. LUKE'S REGIONAL M EDICAL CENTER: r~Pr~4 ~/~ f` ~% -~° ~•-,- %.~'Z ~i~ a z'~n ey 'f,'v ~~-ep~-~e o~--~ ~.w~ cG~-~.c. .P-is ~ ~-h ~T~ a r - ~~•-t ~< ) TONY BOHNER: SEWER;;~EASEMENT MAINTENANCE ROAD ~LANSBUi~Y G~ ~`~~~~t LANE SUBDIVISI;ON (CHRIS WILLIAMS): .f..frl~,lP acc~p~te y~ ~pe~.~.,~- ~c~~ rG~~ /Pt~~~ 7b ~i /~~ J.GIBSON : EXTENSION FOR APPROVAL OF KASTLE FALLS/ VALERI PLACE #2: ~c~~rn~~G e~-a-e` SHELLY DOTY - REQUEST F~ O OOK UP TO WATER AND SEW : ~l~o~ l~.~~,~-w~~~con~i~i~z~ c~~ d~~e.~'~ee ~l~:e ~~h, h~ WATER/SEWER/TRASH~DEUNQUENCIES: a~~r~v~~G flw~.s e~~~v ''i ~ /'~e S'~o-n.~s,~ ~~~. ~y ~ 20. APPROVE BILLS: ~~~, 21. EXECUTIVE SESSION: F ~~ ~~~c:~i !~ 22. DEPARTMENT REPORTS CIS WRIGHT LAWSUIT: ~~~ " ~~<' ~~/h. /~~ ~ ~h e - i ~~~ ,~~~.,~~y . . ~ ~t~~ ~ a~ ~ . ~1 /A/ V/ ~~rV ~ ,+ ~ ~ ~ ~`~~i~ ~, ~ . ~-- ~-y~ PUBLIC MEETING SIGN-UP SHEET ~ "I . PHONE NUMBER: ~~ . . . ~ 3Z z -/o ~ ? ~ Ld~ ~flEili~IlY~ T~t~;~S~~E ~'kL~~Y c~-v i f~~H~ ~f~, l~A~~ ~3642 IVAME: ~ _3~~ ~ ~- ~ ~~-3~ , , . , . ORDINANCE NO. ~ 5~ ~ AN ORDTNANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A TRACT OF LAND SITUATE IN A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Counail and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to amend and change the zoning from R-8 Residential to L- O, Limited Office, for the described parcel in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the real property which is described as : A tract of land situate in a portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 1, a 1/2" diameter iron bar; thence South 89°52' East 328.84 feet to a 1/2" diameter x 24" long iron bar; thence South 0°34' East 1,074.55 feet to a 1/2" diameter x 24" long iron bar, the true point of beginning; thence South 0°34' East 90.00 feet to a 1/2" diameter iron bar; thence South 89°58' East 75.14 feet to a point; thence South 0°33' West 135.00 feet to a point of the North right-of-way line of Cherry Lane; thence South 89°58' East along said right-of-way line, 254 feet, more or less to a 1/2" diameter x 24" iron bar; thence 4~EST ONE ORDINANCE Page 1 ~ ~ ~ North 0°27' West 225.00 feet to a 1/2" diameter x 24" iron bar; thence North 89°58' West 326.64 feet, more or less, to the true point of beginning. EXCEPT the following: A tract of land situate in a portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter af Section 1, a 1/2" diameter iron bar; thence South 89°52' East 328.84 feet to a 1/2" diameter x 24" long iron bar; thence South 0°34' East 1,074.55 feet to a 1/2" diameter x 24" long iron bar, the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 0°34' East 90.00 feet to a 1/2" diameter iron bar; thence South 89°58' East 75.14 feet to a point; thence North 0°33' East 90.00 feet to a point; thence North 89°58' West 76.90 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; And also EXCEPTING the parcel deeded to Ada County Highway District recorded March 29, 1977, as Instrument No. 7713159. be and the same is hereby rezoned from R-8 Residential to L-O, Limited Office, and Section 11-2-425, Official Zoning Maps is hereby amended to reflect the same. This rezoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian City Council on the request for rezone. Section 2. The Applicant shall tile all ditches, canals WEST ONE ORDINANCE Page 2 • ~ and waterways and install pressurized irrigation. Section 3. That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above conditions the property shall be subject to rezone back to R-8. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the Meridian City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this J- day of '~~ , 1994 . APPROVED: MAYOR -- GRANT P. K ATTEST: ~.~ ~iY j _ `~ p~PVS{ ~I ~C:~'/'~t;~~'~'.°`--'~ i - V ~+L ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ m # WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. -- CITY CLERK `q .•.. ~ ~ p "i~t 1 ~t • ~4 ~ ~ ~a~Arty , eo WEST ONE ORDINANCE Page 3 ~ • SfiATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH IS GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS A TRACT OF LAND SITUATE IN A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF 5ECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE;" passed as Ordinance No.~S6 , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the S~ day of ~-J'u,/y , 1994, as the same appears in my office. DATED this .~'y` day of ~~~ , 1994. ~•~~~~G~---~ ~ .E~' City Clerk, City o Ada County, Idaho STATE OF IDAHO,) : ss. County of Ada, ) ~~ a~P~~~ ~~~ V ~~'" •"°~ '~o 'F -~v ~ ~~ ~~A~. ~ ~ ~, 'cG °'° ~ C,i,~ ~'T 1 s~' ~G @ eQ~~Y i'Y . ~a On this .5 day of ~ u~y , 1994, b , the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. , . ,e~`Q1~ee:~:asr~~OSS ., ,~~~~.;~,~~ ~,;,~ ~ _.1~,,~~';~ ~'p. ^ ^' a3~ "jp ~' i 4 SEAL ^ ~ ,~ ~~~. ~ ,,~ ~, ~ ; 6'1 ~~, ? <i~y ~°~~ e `~4? II ~') -.4 .~A.~ 4D F'~ ' @~~.j <~~ ' ; ~ ~; ~. . , : ~< ~ ~,, : °RS 6.'~~,'yp~,~?~ , 3 s::i,~ ~j N Fi ,,. . ,~ o ..: , ,,,~~ • ~i •~ ~..,y ~~ ~~~~~~~~~i-~.eet~~~~~ WEST ONE ORDINANCE ~ y Public for ldaho .ding at Meridian, Idaho con-wiissiaK eX~ir~s D~o~/9~/ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~j~ ~ CnN c~~~-~ ~'~`'°~~'. .~ ~~ , ~;} ~o~s-_ ~ .' ~gL} JU~ i~~. ~'„`. ~~':i O1 od _ - :~~~ ~~~~ _ _ #. ~ RECOit~ : . . . _. Page 4 ~ ~. ~ ~ , !~+,~i-~4+,'. ~., .,~ ~ ~ ,~r ~~~'~.:'~. . ~ 44~.~1~ `` ~ .~ ~~1.~ ~ .,,~i\'`~ R. ~•. ' :' ` .~ ~ ~ •-..;- ..~ '~ ..-.. ~ .. .~ . ~~ ' _~~ ~~ ~\ 1 ~ . ,,11 ~ O~ a' :RT ~~ A CHERRY LANE .-.-- . . . . . ~_ - t^--~.n~OS ~ ~, FAIRVIEW AVE: S,' ~ . ~ ~ ' r ~ • ORDINANCE NO. (~ ~5 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS AN IRREGULAR TRACT OF LAND LYING IN LOT 1, SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is described in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the real property described as: An irregular tract of land lying in Lot 1, Section 3, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point South 0°7' East 255.75 feet from the corner stone of the Northeast corner of the North East 1/4 of Section 3, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian; thence continuing South 0°7' East 1054.25 feet; thence South 89°52' West 56 feet; thence North 56°8' West 100 feet; thence North 33°32' West 808 feet; thence North 47°25' East 444.20 feet; thence North 0°7' East 25.22 feet; thence South 89°53' East 255.75 feet to the Point and Place of Beginning. is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned R-4 Residential; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - FIRELIGHT ESTATES Page 1 ~ ~ Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning. Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de- annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land. b. That the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted January 4, 1994. c. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address inclusion into the subdivision af the requirementa of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and other matters. d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, 11-9-605 M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways, and 11-9-606 B 14. which pertains to pressurized irrigation. e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the Applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns. f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That the City Clerk shall cause one (1 ~ copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 4. EFFECTTVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Ma or of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this ~ day of J~, 1994. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - FIRELIGHT ESTATES Page 2 • ~ APPROVED: Y -- GRANT P. KINGSF D ATTEST: ~~;~ ~,~~ ,~,, ~~. . `'~ ~r.r ~ ~~~~ W ~,~~ ~~ ~ iG~~r~,c-~---~`, ~'~' ~ ~ P" ~ ~'~ r ~ y~ ~ ~. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. -- TY CLERK ~~s~M '~~{~'~ ~ %~ t. . ~.. ~ $~ ~ ~• ~ ~, ~} ~~ ~ ti,~,}~' ~ ' ~ ~ ; Yr ~'~ ',.F~ r~ . STATE OF IDAHO, ) ~ ~~,~~"~ ~~` : s s . ~`'tD~:~ i"{ . r~ County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS AN IRREGULAR TRACT OF LAND LYING IN LOT 1, SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE."; passed as Ordinance No. ~a5 S , b~ the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the .S - day of .~au./y , 1994, as the same appears in my office. DATED this ~~~ day of `~~, 1994. ~ .~ ,~ . ~~.G--f~.~~ {-~ ~ . ~~,~,,~,. ~` ~;~~ City Clerk, City of r' dian i„`~' M~~~~~~i c~` ~ Ada County, Idaho 'S~'`~ f h ~ `FCw' sYr ~~ ~ 4 ~~,' G ~oo w. i {~,,. ~ ~ C ~ ~'A' k~ A"d ~a.~ " ~ ~ ' ~~ mr-r ~ ~~ ~ +}~,~ T ~ ~ ~w ~ ~ r ~~ p~1 ~' " ' `%•''s ~ , y ~ ,! + ~ .,,~ p., ~5'~ ~ "+~'~~'C%.N?'' ~+k•~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '4~,.~~~ ~ ~' il ~ ,~'~ ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - FIRELIGHT ESTATES Page 3 ~ ~ STATE OF IDAHO,) : ss, County of Ada, ) On this f~ day of ~~ u ~l , 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in andJfor said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and faregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. ~ ~!'669l839BSFP,~,t~ ,e'•`~'''. ' / ~ ~ L'-_ SEAL .~° ~°~ ~- •~,~ ~m N ar Pub ic or ldaho . ..~a o ;`~~ ,~,-~'' `~rt"'~k_~''~'~,'~.a Resi ing at Meridian, Idaho ~ ~` M~ ommission Expires O D a ,°~. "'` , ~`~ n~ ,"~ ~, >~~ , F, ~d E9 f ) . o ~ ~ A;^ e~ 9".J Q ~~ u ~'~?~@. ~ ,: ~ ~ : ,~ r~ :~: `: . - ~ , . ~1 ,~",t - ve ~F y ~ ~ . ~"' ~a ~~~~~~t~ettt~at~t~~a . ~ -. . ~ ~; ~ i ;.,1 ~ . _ .:. ~ ~_._ ~au~_ . -` ~~~ ~ .. __ ANNERATION ORDINANCE - FIRELI(3HT ESTATES Page 4 ~ ~ - '3~ ' ~ WEST TICK ROAD ~~~A~ _ •~~~~~~~~ •~~~~~~~~~~~~~• -~ ; ' ~~ r 2 ~ ~ . ~ ~ , , ~ ~ 1 ~r ~~ / ~ i ~ SITE / ~ ' ' ~ ~ `~~ 1 ~ T R ,11 ~ ~ • 1 ~ ~ " ~/ , ~~' ~ ~ ~ ~ a w a H r~+ z w H 3 S" ~ . 2 . ~~. ~ r~-r`N~` 9a ~~ ~g ~9 Z O~ 2 3 14 ~ 6 s tK S 1F:TB~t+ ST. 4 IS 4 ~ 2 ~ O~-~~ s ~ JOUST ~ W ~ 2 . 1 • -~t s ~2 W > i is i II f ~` I~ ~6 ~- ~ 6 N 2 µ s n ~'J = 3 3 6 w ~ ll 10 = 3 C, NpL LI ~~I 5 i , s = e 9 J H Z a s 8 ~ w. .:AVENNURST S'~ . E 7 8 I 9 10 '. tl -> ,' ~~' , I2 i3 14 :S ~ t6 17 ~ IS ~ :6 17 18 :9 20 21 22 23 , P R 24 23 W 0 . ~3 z• ~ W. MIRAGE C~ M~• f~ELOSTREAM DR ~ Z ~ pOD9 ~ ' 12 I I MEA ~O ~ 9 ~ S ~ R ~ ~ Z ~ ~_I - --- , I s B _~`~~ ~ G~ 2~ 3 p, j ~ F N0 s 2 e ~ . _.;5~ ~~::AM (~, ~'~ s~RE M sT. ~ 2 ~ 7 • S~ 6 7 ~ 1 f 9 ~ ~ 3 - I ~ . ~ I `t ~_ I i• R T ..~, ,. R8 ~ ~ . . _.. ENGIp ,~~. EF9 `' " HUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. ~~ y 8550 Bsthsl Court • 8aias. Idsfa 93709 • 20B/322-8992 ZONING MAP Scale: 1"=300' .SIJM-3@-94 THU 1 2: 0~ THE MA I L CENT EF2 P_ 0 1 ` ' • ~ June 34~ 1s94 Ta ~he Mayor and City Cntxn~iJ.: t~e would like te~ ~r~qu~~~. p~rmissior~ to g~*t an your .ag~n~la for youx a~ext avai~~b~~. m,ee~ing. ~ W`~ wauld also i~,k~; ~o x~e~'~e~~ yoc~r permissia~ ta h4ak up~to C~.ty Wuter and S~w.er. Our prop~rty is ~;a~~ted o:~ 5~ou~h L~r~us'C ~rOvc~ Rd~ad~ ;3~t0 tla. a~ a m#,le ~r4~m ~Ov~~~~.r~d Raad. The addr~~s o.~ our ;prape~:~y !~s ~190 S. Lo~~s~t ~~xt~'~~ Rt~~ti~. It consi~~a~ o~ anes acre. ~ xhank you, . K;e~da]~1 and sh~lley rio~y ~7+~-~art s AE~~~'~~1C~ ,! U ~ 3 0 1994 C~TY OF ~~1~ID1AN J4JN-30-94 THI.J 1~ _ 0T THE MA I L CENTER ~ • • ~ ~ ~~ ~' : ~ ~~ . ~~~. -..t t ~~ ~ 1~i~i ~As . .. i`~' . . . , ~ A~~ .*~~. . ~ ~ . ~ ~~. • Y7~~ ' ~yyA\, • 'y~I! . , • ^w , ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~t ~ :~ ~ t ~: t .~~. r .~ ~~ '~ , ~ :I ~ ~ ' V M r' : I~ECI~~~TEY, J U N 3 0 1994 CITY OF A9ERIDIAN , ~ ,AyA'•I'r/, ~*~ .v~A ~ . .. , ~'•+~~"~'.~ '~ i~;'.:L ~ , _ ~~~ ) • {~~i~ •~s~!l~~1!.AC. x,-/ ,OI~'!' ~'Yy~' i ~ . ~ ~~ f , ~; .~ .~~,. ~~Mf.• "'~Y ~ ~~~~. aC~, ,"~f!~~,~, ~IYt?li!'~ ~ ~.....r j ~~~ ,....,,.',,;;,. r ' ~ e ~ ~ ~',.. .. • ~:1,' y • '' Y ~~~3N-~!M'+A- a~l- Rl1~~"~'~ ~~~ ~7f`~~ ~ ; w ..h.; I~rCt~. , . , , ~;•~,•~Ry• , , . ~ • ..~ ~.~. ..~ • ~;y~ ~ ~yi• , " . ; • , ~ ~ , ;. ~ .~ ....., • `~' i: ' ~+a••"~r~,,,~;"""~""".~,,.,.,,..,.,.,,,,,,. ~ , , ~ • ~ ••'4. My~ ' . . . i . ~~ .. . ~. ~ ~~ • . k 4L1.. .«~~ii~itlYli~a~ ill.i ~ ~~.ri:".'~. ~ 4 yIR~.~Ylrr~-+~ PI 0 2 t, . l. ~ . ~ ' ~i S~~~y ~~ ,'~, ~ '', 3 ?G - 7~ / ~ ',I ~i '~ , ~ C ~u~~~ £~~~, o~, ~ '~i' ~ ~ ~, I, . w~~ ~- se~ N• , ' ~ - ~,',~ ~e~s r ~~~ ~~ ~ '~' ; ,, '~~~,i ! , ~ ~ _. :,', ~ ~ ~ i ---- UvcRt~d .1 ~ ~ - - -----,- ------ ~~ II ~' I -` / ; , ; ~ , -; ~;~;',~ ~, ~~ ; ~ ,~ ~, ~;~ o „ ~ '~ N ~, ; > ~ ~ - ~ m a ~ _ q cn ~ I' / - ~ ,,~, 'ao~i ` i ~/~~\ ~ ; ,, , , ~' ~ ~ ' 1~ ,~ , ; N~~~ . j; - O ~~ - " ~ A ~ ~j , ~i --------------- -------~ ~ ° ..Z3'h J~i~-_~/ ~ ,• i ~I ~~ ~ I 2 _._ , ~ ~ ,~ ~ ;~ '~ I ) ~ ,~ ~ ~' ' 1 ~ I ~ ~ _~k--~ ~ Q ~'' ~ -~ __ ~ ~ ; ~ 181T11~9__-~~" ~ ~ - 41 '. i ~ - -~ I I 1 - ~ ~ ""R1i0UFlII AVE a ~ ' ~ ' ; ~, -,~-~ - - - % , ~ ,-~ _ ~ i i ~_~5~~.,_w~~ __ ._~ ~-~,-%;~ ' ~ ~ h ~, - . ~ ~ _ ------- --gj~SPD __--- ~ ~~~ ` Z ~ , , -- ____- - ~ " ; _ --- i " ` ! ~ ° ;'tnl I j ~~ ,'~ i 1 .I I~j - I .\ ,._-- i i i ~i i -- -_ ~ ~ I ~_ , ~ i ~I ~. ' i ' i - i i ~ i i ~ I i ~ ~ ~ i ' i i i i I I i ~i i" i i i i iZ , I la', ~ LL, i i i ~i : i ' ~ i ~ i~i ' i i ; i I -- 10.~ i' i i ~ i ~ mi i ~ ~ i i i ~ i I i ~; iW' i i i i i.-~----~i i ~ 1 ` _ N~~ ~ ~ ~~i ~ \_~___' _~ ~__~.___ __~ ._'__-'_'~~ ; ~ I ~ - ~,,,- ~._,--3LUt_l~1KM~ _S_ `_ ---------- N~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ----,LL~ o ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ It=~ ; ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ -- ' I ~ . , ~ , , .. ~ ~~ ~ ; ; ~ ~' li ~ '~ ~~, .- . , ; '----- -~en-a~'a~fa~aa-~-------r~ --- --- ---- %"> ` , , _ , , ------ --, .- ---- --- __ ~ o , ~~ ~ ; j I ~~ ;~i;~ ~I ~ ~,- ~,~`, ~ ; ~0~~ ~ ~ - '~Y~~ ~z i j . \ Q -- ; ~ ~ qOy[~ ;p'I~; Oi ; m• N ~ ~~/~~, i ~ i ~ ~W im I~~'. I I i: ~ ~ ~I ~- '~! 1~~ ~ i"(G\~ / ~ i i y ~ ~ ~ i !'~.~ / , ~ i I i i i -fG~-' . , i i ~, . / i i WI 4 I I wl~, ~ ~~ --- -~ `G` i i ~ -----;- i ' i --- ' i ._~- --- `_ ~ ~~_,~ R _-- ~ °~\ \ ~ i , ~ .---- ~ ~; , _ ~ ~, , _ , , - ., _ ~ y _~ ~ ; ~ - -- ~ ~' LL R ' ~ ~ ~ '~ : ~ ~ \ ~' ~ ~ ~J ~ _ +I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ : ,,~ ~ ~,~, . ; ~ ~ ~ ------- ~_----- -- --- - ---'~~ ,, ,,~_-- ; -- -- --- - -_- - -- ----- ; ~ ',~~ ~.l ,- `~-------~ ~v~4~~~__ N s_--~ ; , '. i(1-ZT-~-1~-l~l':~~(~- ---- \ ~ ~ R e~~ . r ;~- ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ p ¢ J ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ 3 '~ h °~s~~ ;\ , \. . ~/ ~ ~ ~~ ~a ° ~ ~ ~'v < ~,\ ~~\ ,,.~. ~ - "" ., ~:~~ // i/ . ~ ~ In; ~- !~ i! O 'v ~~i,/ ~ . /~ ; ' ~ Z -- ~~~, ~~r~, ~ ' ,,,~, w y~ ~ )~ ~---- ~, y~="~' ~ >Q ~ ~ ~t~~'i%~~ ~ -~i r.~c~~~~e~ ~ 5- ~~ Wayne S. Forrey, AIC~ C~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ Urban Planner and Development Analyst - - --- S~'^?~cY~r-~Pf ~~' 52 East Franklin Road - Meridian, Idaho 83642 Telephone (208) 887-6015 Fax (208) 887-6049 1. July 1993 - City determines two sewer priorities - Funded in 1993 - 1994 budget, 50K to 80K. a) Five Mile Trunk Sewer, b) Lift Station #1 Comprehensive Planning / 2, December 14, 1993, City conducts sewer alternatives meeting to review Five Ciry & Regional Mile Trunk Sewer project. 63 in attendance. Plan Updates c~t~le~ 3. January 1994 - City and St. Lukes agree to coordinate development plans in P3~;;~~pat~°~ the "Eagle / I-84 Crossroads Area° ~o,rm,,,,;,Y a. City contacts 10 property owners - annexation path Rei~~~~~~ b. Hospital retains engineers and architects - planning underway Grow;n M4~,ag°me~: 4. City identifies 6 properties as a potential annexation pathway to stimulate ~;a~,,m~,,em~~,~~;on sewer development and commerce at the "Crossroads" Z°"'~g' A~,~~Xa`~°n 5. February 1994 - Property owners meet together and St. Lukes agrees to pay for & Development o~d~~a~~es the annexation pathway cost as suggested by the City. Code Analysis 6. Mar 1994 - Roylance combines the Peck, Thomas, Wurst, St. Lukes properties. Land Deve!opment P~a~n~~g & 7. March 1994 - G.L. Voight and Hubble Engineers request annexation ~;eg°"a"°~5 independent of the "Crossroads Annexation Path" i~f~a~~, ~~~~~~ P'a~°'~~ g, April 1994 - St. Lukes and E. L. Bews commence master planning of abutting Revitalization Iar~d parcels....( Bews annexation June P8~Z Hearing) Plans E~o~o~~;~ 9. During research of the ITD Interchange ROW - Roylance and ITD determine that oe~e'°pm~nt the interchange legal description includes property which abuts Peck. Communiry oe~e~oPm~n~ 10. The City's objective of stimulating commerce at the "Crossroads" can be F'~a~~~ A"a~Ys~s achieved through the Voight - Peck - ITD - St. Lukes annexation pathway and F~S~a~ construction of the Five Mile Sewer Trunk project. Implications ~ F~~,~ ~,y s«~~e~,ES 11. The Thomas and Wurst properties can also be annexed into the City which P~e~;~ P~,,~~v meets their development desires and objectives. Evaluation P~oJe~~ 12. Thomas Subdivision was approved years ago by the County subject to central Ma~~ge~pe~t sewer. Annexation into Meridian erases the old County approval. Planning c~~t~~~t Director comments are valid. Commerce at the "Crossroads" is planned. Planniny ~~'~'~es `° 13. Comprehensive Plan is a good place to start and a workable guide: Clties & Counties a. Voight (R-4) quality development / school / parkl buffers b. Peck (C-Gj quality business development and commerce c. ITD annexation ties the "Crossroads" together and allows quality planned mixed business uses at all quadrants. d. St. Lukes (L-O) supports Meridian's self - sufficiency zb°~~9 ~e~BAV,v~~(~III~I~~kl~o,~~~~5~~~~~~~,~~~6~~I~P-~P~~~~~~,~~~b~ ~ ~ DELINQUENCY LIST TURN OFF LIST SCHEDLTLED FOR 07/13/94 ACCOUNT # NAME & ADDRESS AMT. PAST DUE 1- --20 THOMAS R. HAMMOND 88.00 719 MERIDIAN ST. 1---80 LEONARD MCFADDEN 50.75 132 W. BROADWAY AVE 1--220 MII,DRED C. JOHNSON 63.00 330 W. BROADWAY 1-1040 JOE & H. AZEVEDO 52.00 110 W. RAILROAD AVE. 1-1280 TECO INVESTMENTS 56.20 809 W. 2ND ST 1-2000 HEIDI SELLERS 134.00 331 W. IDAHO AVE. 1-2040 DOUGLAS SEAMONS 44.00 203 W. IDAHO AVE 1-2110 PHYLLIS BARROETABENA 44.00 37 W. IDAHO AVE 1-3340 JERALD GOULD 78.60 619 W. PINE AVE. 1-3660 THOMAS H. BRANDT 49.00. 411 MERIDIAN RD 2--438 MEDLEY HOMES 44.00 582 W. APPLEGATE ST 2--650 AUSTIN L. YOUNG 49.60 906 W. lOTH ~ 2-1200 K.STEWART & B. SMART 1332 W. 1ST ST 2-1530 JAIME OBENCHAIN 1320 W. 2ND ST. , 2-1560 DAVID DOMKA 1404 W. 2ND ST. 2-1860 H. LARUE BEVINGTON 240 MAPLE AVE 2-1970 KERRY L. LARSON 225 W. MAPLE 2-2030 VIRGINIA MEYER 230 CAMELLIA 2-2040 SHERI TODD 236 CAMELLIA 2-2060 SCOTT FARMER 314 CAMELLIA 2-2140 WILMA BLAIR 1239 W. 2ND 2-2150 LOIJIE J. NEAGLE 216 CHERRY AVE. 2-2280 RICHARD SCHERER 201 CHERRY AVE 2-2470 EDWARD L. BAUGES 339 CHERRY AVE 2-2500 ELLEN M. BAILEY 338 CHERRY AVE 2-3340 RICHARD POE. 1115 W. 6TH 2-3712 CLYDE E. BRINEGAR 1625 MERIDIAN ST. ~ 39.90 46.60 65.80 58.60 83.30 46.60 83.20 70.40 42.40 104.00 122.20 41.50 59.20 67.10 62.00 ~ 2-4200 CLAUDE J. BLAKELY 1618 W. 8TH ST. 2-4240 DAVID L. SHAFFER 1208 W. 12TH AVE.. 2-4520 PATRICIA R. WII,LIAMS 1409 W. 13TH ST. 2-4740 JLTDY ALBRECHT 1406 W. 14TH ST. 2-4890 STEVEN J. BISHOP 1540 W. 15TH ST 2-5010 GEORGE EARLEY 1536 N. LINDER RD 2-5040 BARRY MITCHELL 1527 NORTHGATE AVE 2-5130 RUSSELL SMITH 1433 W. 14TH ST 2-5170 JII.,L RODRIGUEZ 1401 W. 14TH ST 2-5740 MONA NIlVIl~~O 1327 W. CARLTON ST 2-5810 CHARLES R. REA 1105 W. 13TH AVE 2-5960 E.GAINES & R.SCH[TLER 1104 WASHINGTON PL 2-6300 GLEN SCHII,DHAUER 1203 W. 8TH 2-6380 STEVE G. NONAMAKER 908 W. WASHINGTON DR 2-6440 FREDRICK J. SHADDICK 1002 W. WASHINGTON DR ~ 58.90 82.00 70.80 80.40 76.10 69.40 141.80 60.20 75.00 81.40 80.20 55.50 79.80 50.00 134.80 . 2-6660 SUSAN DAVIS 1101 W. 11TH ST 2-6710 AMER. PROPERTY MGMT 1145 W. STATE ST. 3---54 RICK FISHER 705 N. ABERNATHY WY.. 3--314 MIKE MCDOUGAL 2001 W. SNYDER DR 4-1778 BRIAN TI-~BEDAU. 1360 N. STUCKER AVE 4-1908 DARRELL R. BYERS 1533 N. TOKAY WAY 4-2162 FEIVIX CONSTRUCTION 1259 N. SANTA ROSA AVE 4-2304 RUSSELL KOYLE 1515 N. SANTA ROSA PL 5--224 CAROLE GREAVES 3994 W. BIG CREEK CT 20-1492 DEl~TNIS TRAMPLEASURE 3565 W. TUPELO CT. 20-1560 MEDLEY HOMES 3460 SUGAR CREEK DR 20-1910 CHARLES I. FREELAND 1865 INTERLACHEN WAY 20-1918 HARRY V. FARNER 1815 INCLINE WAY 20-2058 WILLIAM L. PATTERSON 3349 SUGAR CREEK DR 21-1144 ROBIN & L. SISIAM 2333 N. MAXIE WAY ~ 51.00 119.20 86.80 58.80 45.35 110.60 58.00 83.80 83.20 137.60 44.00 55.60 78.80 200.40 44.00 ~ • 21-1176 MICHAEL & J.ARMSTRONG 92.00 2510 W. CHATEAU DR 21-1654 HAROLD LEON DOWNEY 76.80 2110 TODD WAY . 21-1758 ROBERT B. KOCK 85.20 1840 TODD WAY 21-1776 EARL & LONA FOREMAN 91.40 1920 TODD WAY 21-1820 MARK DAVIS 68.20 2001 TODD WAY 21-1868 DAREL D. PEDERSEN 47.85 2638 REBECCA WAY 21-1870 DOUGLAS & C. SCHOPPELREY 113.30 2644 REBECCA WAY 21-1894 CLINTON BARNHART 84.35 2580 MISTY DRIVE 21-1900 BARRY H. MUIR 89.00 2585 MISTY DRIVE 21-1902 C. ALDON JOHNSON 65.60 2561 MISTY DRIVE 21-1928 BRUCE R. BAILEY 141.00 2590 REBECCA WAY 21-1990 JAMES L. WALSH 71.40 2935 W. ANN ST. 21-2068 JEFFREY & P. PUGMIRE 65.80 3015 W. ANN ST 21-2254 DAWN ANDERSON. 56.60 1957 N. SWAINSON AVE. 21-2960 G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT 44.00 2870 W. FIELDSTREAM DR • 21-2980 DAIVIEL KOOS. 3086 W. MIIZAGE CT 22--312 STEVEN M. CANTRELL 1750 W. CHATEAU DR 22--334 PAUL D. JOHNSON 1911 TRACY CT 22--788 JOHN TODD DOWrTING 2316 W. CHATEAU DR. 22--874 MICHAEL YOST. 2225 N. KUBIK PL 22--922 RODNEY D. BRADY 2155 MONACO WAY 22-1146 CHERRY LANE BAPTIST 2150 W. CHERRY LANE 22-1326 ADELAIDE CARTER 1905 MONACO WAY 22-1340 WESTON & L. WHEAT 1901 W. MCGLINCHEY ST 22-13 80 STEPHEN F. AMAR. 2008 MONACO WAY 22-1386 MICHAEL SCHAEFFER 1933 W. SANDALWOOD DR. 22-1396 WII.LIAM AVERY 1967 CAIRNS WAY 22-1404 ERIC L. FIJLKERSON 1816 W. MCGLINCHEY ST 22-1410 JEFFREY RUTH 1811 W. MCGLINCHEY ST 22-1412 MARTIN DUARTE 1803 W. MCGLINCHEY ST. • 49.00 92.40 86.20 59.00 100.20 74.20 176.30 62.00 71.20 68.80 110.40 96.20 68.60 105.40 59.20 • • 22-1482 LYLE D. ANDERSON 92.00 1723 SANDALWOOD DR 22-1574 ROBERT D. TALBURT 73.00 1895 W. CHATEAU DR. 22-1596 PAUL GIAUQUE 66.00 1767 BEARDEN CT 31----72 ERIC MCLAUGHLIN 32.00 1729 LEISURE LANE 31--142 MARY VANDEVENTER 72.20 1330 W. YOST CT. 31--190 BRET & D. ST'EPHEN 49.00 1965 N. W. 12TH ST 31--248 RUSSELL S. HEUGHINS 79.60. 1528 W. CHERRY LN. 31--608 MICHAEL WALKER 105.20 1333 NEWPORT DR 31--754 DAVID ZASTROW 56.85 ~ 1531 TANA DRIVE 31--758 PHII,IP MARR 66.20 1509 TANA DRIVE 31--808 MARSHA CREEK 64.80 2121 N.W. 12TH ST 31--830 'TIMOTHY K. MII,LER. 44.00 1203 DELMAR DRIVE 31--834 TED DLJMONT, JR 85.40 2219 N.W. 12TH ST 31--868 CONNIE L. JAKOMEIT 77.00 1338 W. CHATEAU AVE 31-1008 CAL PERMAN 89.60 1481 DARRAH DR • 31-1028 MERTON LOGUE. 1341 DARRAH DR. 31-1274 JAMES & B. CALLISON 2662 W. 12TH ST. , 31-3028 JOEL LYNN YEAGER 1339 W. CHATEAU AVE. 31-3050 DEBRA FRENCH 1065 W. CHATEAU DR 31-3230 STEPHEN M. WITT 2323 N.W. I 1TH AVE. 31-3242 DAVID E. MCGOWAN 2211 N.W. 11TH ST 31-3272 ROB WHITED. 2095 N. W. 11 TH 31-3368 DONNA GARDNER 933 W. CHATEAU DR. 31-3394 PHILIP R. CARROLL 1080 DELMAR DRIVE 31-3420 JULIA COUCH 1012 FAIRWOOD CT. 31-3422 TIM ALLEN 1034 FAIRWOOD CT 31-3514 GEORGE OSTLUND. 1786 N. W. 11 TH AVE 32--454 JACK MCLEAN 2094 N.W. 8TH ST 32--508 BRIGITTE STONE 626 MCGLINCHEY 32--522 STEVEN HAVEN. 1843 LAWNDALE DR ~ 71.80 69.20 74.80 50.00 90.40 115.80 72.40 68.20 62.80 68.60 73.65 80.00 72.40 129.40 66.80 • • 32--566 BARBARA J. HICKS 110.80 1919 CRESTMONT DR 32--630 VINCENT CrARDNER. 115.60 2070 CRESTMONT DR. 32--852 GREGORY BEEBE 62.20 567 W. WII.,LOWBROOK DR 32--872 ROGER F. BECKER 118.60 671 TIFFANY DR. 32--880 BILL L. LINDAUER 69.80 551 TIFFANY DR. 32-1178 KIRK GRUELL 46.35 161 W. SPICEWOOD DR. 34--342 RONALD & T. DARCO . 132.00 1686 JERICHO 34--500 LAYNE MOURITSEN 114.20 2092 N. SAPPHIRE PL. 34--504 RONALD ERICKSON 80.20 2096 N. SAPPHIltE PL. 34--552 BRADLEY D. FOSTER 78.00 2120 N. AMETHYST PL 34--926 CHARLES & M. FiIENTES 66.10 1391 E. HUNTER DR. 34-1018 DONALD & J. RICE 65.60 2548 N. ELK COVE WY 34-1168 BENCO, INC. 44.00 2464 N. BLACK BEAR WY 34-1172 CARL & D. QUARENBERG 65.45 2530 N.BLACK BEAR WY 34-1838 MICHAEL P. KELLY 65.80 2071 N.E. IOTH AVE • 34-1844 STEPHEN BLJFFATT 2092 N.E. IOTH ST. 34-1888 RANDY C. MARCUM 2132 N. LARK PL . 34-2104 HEIDI TYLER 1034 TAMMY ST 34-2122 GLEN SCHMIDT 1920 TEARE AVE. 34-2126 DANA K. GRIGG 1015 CLARENE ST 34-2134 OPAL BLUME TRUST. 1071 CLARENE ST. 42-1446 WADE MII.,LER 2005 E. OAKCREST DR 42-1962 DALE L. ORCUTT 2225 N. LAUGHRIDGE AVE. 42-1966 CLAY A. BARRY 1960 E. MEADOWWOOD ST. 42-2102 STEPHAN WII,LMORE 2286 N. WINGATE PL 42-2252 BRAD L. MCKINLEY 2220 E. CHATEAU DR. 42-2350 JOHN D. LEWIS 1787 E. GREENMEADOW CT 42-2734 P. R. HARWARD 1818 E. GLENLOCH ST 50---12 PALJL H. SMITH 29 E. STATE AVE. 50---30 E. E. BRINEGAR 115 E. STATE AVE ~ 126.40 97.40 67.20 117.00 90.80 102.40 110.60 69.20 111.40 53.00 91.40 53.00 71.70 49.60 51.60 • ~ 50---88 PATSY GARRETT. 55.60 934 E. STH ST 50---90 ROBERT HENDRY. 74.80 515 E. STATE AVE. 50--194 CLAYNE VVHITNEY 6?.00 . 524 E. STATE AVE. 50--208 MIKE CLAiJNCH 107.80 338 E. STATE AVE.#2 50--210 NIIKE CLAiJNCH 75.80 338 E. STATE AVE.#1 50--256 JOHN ROBBINS 63.70 32 E. STATE AVE 50--284 MIKE SAUNDERS 54.20 31 E. CARLTON AVE 50--344 RICHARD E. MAYHEW. 70.40 513 E. CARLTON AVE. 50--738 KENNETH W. RIVAS. 106.00 1210 E. 2 1/2 ST. 50-1380 GARY TIlVISON 90.55 1302 E. 1 ST ST. 50-1856 SANDRA AVERILL 25.00 1035 E. FAIRVIEW AVE. 50-3716 GALE MANGLJM 64.60 999 N. SCRIVNER WY 50-4578 RONALD & J. LARSEN 63.80 214 E. PINE AVE. 51--314 RICK HORTON 43.80 342 E.. BROADWAY AVE. 51--446 127 CLUB 540.70 127 E. IDAHO AVE • ~ 51--454 R. B. NIELSEN 116.00 725 E. 2ND ST. 51--486 I~ATI-~RINE KEELE 75. 80 325 E. IDAHO AVE. 51--774 BOB PREECE 44.00 126 E. IDAHO AVE 51-3222 BRAD & SUSAN SMITH. 67.80 204 E. 2ND ST. 51-3234 GARY R. KNOX 45.00 205 E. 2ND ST. 51-3246 PAiJL W. MCKAGUE 53.20 110 E. WII.,LIAMS AVE. 51-3300 DAVID ROBERTS 56.00 133 E. KING ST. 51-3320 TIMOTHY P. ZIlVIN~R 88.40 234 E. 2ND ST 51-3350 STEVEN GREGORY. 44.00 225 E. KING ST. 51-3370 CINDI ATWOOD 36.00 223 E. 3RD ST 51-3740 DON SCHNEE 68.40 203 E. ADA ST. 51-3990 DANNY W. FISHER 44.00 116 E. ADA ST. 51-4200 PHII.,II' G. LORCHER 100.40 432 E. 2ND ST. 51-4350 SHOW PLACE CARPETS 153.50 516 N. MERIDIAN RD. 69--528 MARVIN & K. FIELDS 59.20 1044 W. PEACOCK ST. ~ ~ 69--622 EMERALD HOMES 102.00 1293 E. PEACOCK ST. 69--634 LYNN & S. THOMAS 88.00 1320 E. PEACOCK,ST. 69--740 RON LEA CONSTRUCTION 74.00 1700 S. GOLDSMITH AVE. 69--744 DARWIN AMES 53.30 1654 S. GOLDSMITH AVE. 69--912 PATRICK SULLIVAN 83.30 927 E. KINGSFORD DR. 69-1076 DAVID & L. RUPERT 97.90 923 E. STE. MARTIN DR. 69-1084 GARY & G. BENNETT . 98.60. 1015 E. CAYMAN DR 69-1620 MICHAEL L. BACHMAN 143.60 1836 S.E. STH WAY 72--140 THE DEVELOPMENT CO 104.20 112 W. DAVENPORT DR 72--192 'TI~ DEVELOPMENT CO 132.30 1995 S. RIPTIDE AVE '72--202 THE DEVELOPMENT CO 75.00 1988 S. RIPTIDE AVE ?2--204 TI~ DEVELOPMENT CO 133.20 1962 S. RIPTIDE AVE 74---50 RUSSELL D. WECKERLY 55.00 251 S.W. 7TH AVE. 74---88 LONNIE GREENFIELD 92.00 532 KEARNEY PLACE 74--426 GLORIA LACY. 61.60 623 BARRETT ST ~ • 74-1032 BRADLY C. MICHAELSON 65.80 46 ROSE CIRCLE 74-1114 WILLIAM S. KIRTT,EY 45.00 53 ROSE CIRCLE, 74-2368 FLOYD ELDRED 98.20 1014 CRESTWOOD CL 74-2426 CHRIS & CHERYL DUNNE 69.20 1082 W. K;IMRA ST. 74-2476 LEO PEREZ 75.80 1358 W. KIMRA ST 74-2540 LONNIE GANIlV~L 68.80 1207 W. KIlVIItA ST 74-2834 MICHAEL MCCORMICK . 141.00 1289 W. CRESTWOOD DR. 74-2850 JAMES CHEESBROUGH 73.00 519 S. SPOONBILL AVE. 74-2876 TRACY USSERY 92.20 1345 W. MERGANSER DR. 74-2940 PATRICIA SMITH 77.40 1468 W. PINTAII, DR. 74-3014 DAVID & LISA ARY 58.20 672 S. PELICAN WAY 74-3238 DEBRA RULE 48.35 1134 W. GREENHEAD DR 74-3326 MICHAEL A. YOUNG 119.80 1516 W. GREENHEAD DR. . . * TOTAL DUE: 16,329.70