HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995 09-191 t
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1995 - 7:30 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 5, 1995:
(APPROVED)
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 5, 1995:
(APPROVED)
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 12, 1995:
(APPROVED)
MARSHALL BAKER, EXECUTIVE OF PHYSICIAN SERVICES: SPECIAL
ANNOUNCEMENT FOR ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL:
2: TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: CC&R'S FOR SALMON RAPIDS SUBDIVISION:
(TABLED UNTIL OCTOBER 3, 1995)
3. TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: CC&R'S FOR LOS ALAMITOS SUBDIVISION:
(TABLED UNTIL OCTOBER 3, 1995)
4: TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR WATERBURY PARK SUBDIVISION
N0.5 BY RAMON YORGASON: (TABLED UNTIL OCTOBER 3, 1995)
5. TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: AMENDEp FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST
FOR SALMON RAPIDS SUBDIVISION N0.3 BY FARWEST DEVELOPERS
(TABLED UNTIL OCTOBER 3, 1995)
6. TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SALMON RAPIDS
SUBDIVISION NO. 3 BY FARWEST DEVELOPERS: (TABLED UNTIL
OCTOBER 3, 1995)
7. TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST FOR
THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO.S 8~ 6 BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT:
(CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE ORDINANCE AND/OR AMENDED
FINDINGS OF FACT ANQ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW)
• •
8. TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 5 5~ 6 BY
STEINER DEVELOPMENT: (TABLED UNTIL OCTOBER 3, 1995)
9. TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: RAMON YORGASON: REQUEST FOR
REIMBURSEMENT OF WELL DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR CROSSROADS
SUBDIVISION: (TABLED UNTIL OCTOBER 3, 1995)
10. ORDINANCE #712 - WHITESTONE ESTATES SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION:
(APPROVED)
11. ORDINANCE #713 -LOS ALAMITOS SUBDIVISION NO. 3 ANNEXATION:
(TABLED UNTIL OCTOBER 3, 1995)
12. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LOS ALAMITOS SUBDIVISION NO. 3 BY FARWEST
DEVELOPERS TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: (TABLED UNTIL
OCTOBER 3, 1995)
13. ORDINANCE #714 -JACKSON FOOD STORES ANNEXATION: {APPROVED)
14. ORDINANCE #715 -TREASURE VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH ANNEXATION:
(APPROVED)
16. ORDINANCE #716 -AIR QUALITY ORDINANCE: (APPROVED)
17. AMENDED ORDINANCE #559 - DANBURY FAIR SUBDIVISION: (APPROVED)
18. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR WHITESTONE
ESTATES SUBDIVISION BY WHITESTONE PARTNERSHIP: (CITY
ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDNGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW)
19. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A QUICK LUBE SHOP BY JAY
BURRUP: (APPROVED FINDINGS; APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE)
20. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A NAIL SALON BY GRETCHEN
SHERWOOD: (APPROVED FINDINGS; APPROVED CONDITIONAL U5E)
21. GERRY SWEET: CONCERNS ON PROPOSED EXPANSION OF CHERRY LANE
GOLF COURSE:
22. LOUISE BRONSON: BUS SERVICE FOR MERIDIAN:
~ •
23. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR LA PLAYA MANOR:
(APPROVED)
24. DEPARTMENT REPORTS:
A. GARY SMITH, CITY ENGINEER:
1. INITIATE ANNEXATION PROCESS FOR WASTE WATER PLANT:
2. BID RESULTS -MERIDIAN GREENS PUMP STATION ADDITION:
(AWARD BID TO RIVERSIDE)
B. SHARI STILES, PLANNING & ZONING ADMISITRATOR:
1. DENTAL LAB AT 1608 MERIDIAN STREET: (APPROVE USE)
2. VICKIE WELKER: REQUEST TO OPERATE A REAL ESTATE OFFICE
OUT OF RESIDENCE: (APPROVE DEFERRAL OF PAVING UNTIL
JULY 1, 1996)
C. WAYN~ CROOKSTON, CITY ATTORNEY:
1. IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE:
2. OLD SCHOOL BUILDING:
D. MAYOR GRANT KINGSFORD:
1. LETTER FROM JANICE GASS CONCERNING IRS AUDIT: (CHECK WITH
AUDITOR ON ITEMS)
•
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 19, 1995
The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor Grant
Kingsford at 7:30 P.M.:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Walt Morrow, Max Yerrington, Bob Corrie, Ron Tolsma:
OTHERS PRESENT: Will Berg, Wayne Crookston, Gary Smith, Shari Stiles, Jim Johnson,
Chief Gordon, Brian McColl, Marty Goldsmith, Jon Jacques, Richard Taylor, Vernon Croft,
Glenn Bentley, Kristina Donner, Jon Mabbiett, Jay Atwood, Marshall Baker, Steve
Bradbury, Doug Campbell, Charles Eddy, Glen Rosenthal, Mel Burrup, Gretchen
Sherwood, Gerry Sweet:
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 5, 1995:
Kingsford: Any corrections to those minutes?
Tolsma: Mayor I move they be approved as written.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve of the September 5, 1995 minutes,
all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 5, 1995:
Kingsford: Any corrections to those minutes?
Yerrington: Mr. Mayor, I move for their approval.
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve of the Special Meeting Minutes for
September 5, 1995, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 12, 1995:
Kingsford; Any corrections to those minutes?
Corrie: Mr. Mayor, I move that those minutes be approved.
~ ~
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 2
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Ron to approve of the Special Meeting Minutes for
September 12, 1995, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #1: MARSHALL BAKER, EXECUTIVE OF PHYSICIAN SERVICES: SPECIAL
ANNOUNCEMENT FOR ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL:
Baker: Mayor Kingsford, members of the Council, my name is Marshall Baker I am the
Administrator of St. Luke's Meridian Medical Center. This evening we are here proud and
pleased to announce that we have decided to change the name of this new facility from
St. Luke's West Medical Center to St. Luke's Meridian Medical Center. This new facility
reflects the community of which the model facility is designed for. And after extensive
interviews and surveys with residents and business leaders of Meridian we have been
able to prioritize the health needs of this area. The most needed, the most cost effective
out patient services will be provided at St. Luke's Meridian Medical Center opens in the
Spring of 1996. It is St. Luke's philosophy to take health care services to the people where
they live and where they work. St. Luke's Meridian Medical Center is an extension of our
mission to you and we are proud to name the facility for your community.
Kingsford: Thank you very much we appreciate that, probably a round of applause. Thank
you very much Marshall.
ITEM #2: TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: CC&R'S FOR SALMON RAPIDS
SUBDIVISION:
Crookston: Mr. Mayor I have reviewed those. There were supposed to be some changes,
there were changes faxed to me at 4:15 today and I have not reviewed the changes.
Morrow: Mr. Mayor I move to table until our next meeting, the first meeting in October to
allow the City Attorney time to review the changes.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to table the CC&R's for Salmon Rapids until the
next meeting in October, October 3rd, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
~ •
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 3
ITEM #3: TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: CC&R'S FOR LOS ALAMITOS SUBDIVISION:
Crookston: Same situation.
Morrow: Same motion.
Yerrington: Same second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to table those CC&R's until the October 3rd
meeting, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #4: TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR WATERBURY PARK SUBDIVISION N0. 5 BY
RAMON YORGASON:
Kingsford: I understand we received a letter requesting that be tabled am I correct?
Entertain a motion to that effect.
Morrow: So moved
Corrie: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob to table the findings of fact and conclusions of
law for a variance on Waterbury Park No. 5 until the next meeting October 3rd, all those
in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #5: TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST FOR SALMON
RAPIDS SUBDIVISION NO. 3 BY FARWEST DEVELOPERS:
Kingsford: Has the Council reviewed that?
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move for a table on the issues concerning Salmon Rapids and
Los Alamitos. I know that Salmon Rapids is the one in question here but there has been,
other than receipt of a letter, there has been no meeting befinreen yourself, myself, the City
staff and the developer of Salmon Rapids. It appears to me that meeting needs to take
place prior to any further movement of these subdivisions. My preference would be to see
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 4
them tabled until our October 3rd meeting and have a meeting take place between now
and then to straighten out some of the issues.
Kingsford: Was that a motion Mr. Morrow?
Marrow: I will make it a motion.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to table the issues concerning Salmon Rapids
and Los Alamitos to the next meeting pending a meeting of the developer, Mr. Morrow and
myself, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: Are you interested in scheduling that meeting now?
Goldsmith: I always have been. What exactly are the issues, I have not seen any issues
pertaining to Salmon Rapids No. 1 or Salmon Rapids No. 3. Salmon Rapids No. 3 is the
plat that is before you this evening.
Morrow: Our staff has prepared for us a list of issues that will be discussed at that meeting
Mr. Goldsmith and so I would think it would be in everybody's best interest to schedule a
meeting to get the issues discussed.
Goldsmith: I am not trying to be belligerent or anything I am just trying to make you aware
that I have met the requirements from staff that I have received. All the developing issues
that I can see have been taken care of per the Engineer and City Planning Director. I have
had meetings with them.
Morrow: I understand that there are some other issues that need to be resolved.
Kingsford: Would you make available to Mr. Goldsmith those deficiencies so we can
address them in a meeting jointly so he would be prepared to deal with them. Do we have
a copy of those?
Tolsma: I have a copy of the letter that Gary prepared.
Smith: I don't know that I have it with me.
Kingsford: Would you make that available to Mr. Goldsmith? Okay that would deal with
i
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 5
item 5, 6, 11 and 12.
ITEM #7: TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST FOR
THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 5 & 6 BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT:
Kingsford: Does Council have questions of staff or the developer on that issue?
Morrow: We have in our packet a letter or a proposal from the developer. I would like to
hear him offer that information to us.
Bradbury: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council my name is Steve Bradbury, I am an
attorney, I am representing and asked to speak to this issue on behalf of the applicant. I
am going to keep my remarks relatively short. You have before you an application for
annexation/rezone and the next item on the agenda is for preliminary plat approval. This
matter came .before you I think about a month ago on the annexation and rezone and the
Council concluded that it would prefer to wait and take action with respect to the
annexation, rezone and preliminary plat all at one time.. You had submitted to you today
I think a document which we have entitled summary of proposal for The Lake at Cherry
Lane Subdivision No. 5 & 6. The most important thing that I think we want to convey to
you are, is what is attached as the exhibits A, B and C. Exhibit A is a depiction of the
preliminary plat which is before you tonight. It depicts the R-4 proposed zone designation
area on the westerly portion on the property. The R~ proposed zone designation area and
the central portion of the property what I call that horseshoe shaped road. And the R-15
portion of the zone designation portion of the property which is depicted on the easterly
portions of the property and is depicted as 2 large lots. When this preliminary plat was
presented to you before both you and the Planning and Zoning Commission expressed
concern about what it is that is going to be built or is proposed to be built on those R-15
zone designation lots, these two here. So exhibit B was prepared which is a concept plan
of that which is proposed to be built on those R-15 zone lots. The proposal as you know
contemplates a senior citizen housing complex of two different types. The northerly
portion consisting of condominium town house type living arrangements and the southerly
portion consisting of a mix of single family detached and single family attached dwellings.
Along with a central recreational facility which would be made available to the senior
citizens living in the complex. Exhibit C that you have the third paper behind the summary
is just a list of what we are proposing for the basic development standards for each of the
3 different zone designations so that you will have an idea about lot sizes and densities
and home sizes. We have just, what we tried to do is reduce it down to a single page so
that if you have any questions or concerns with respect to any of those issues you can
quickly refer to them. Now, the proposal as we have attempted to present it to you
presents a precise preliminary plat for the R-4 zone, the property to be zoned R-4 and a
precise preliminary plat for the property to be zoned R-8. And then a concept plan for the
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 6
properties to be zoned R-15. Knowing that you have expressed some concerns about
having some control over what might be built in that R-15 zone if you were to grant that
zone designation we have given you this concept plan with the expectation that we could
request the Council to approve the R-15 zone subject to the conditions that the developer
make a subsequent application for a conditional use permit or if required an additional
preliminary plat to cover those senior citizen complex areas. In other words, if you were
to grant the R-15 zone the developer would be required to make further application before
Planning & Zoning and this body where you folks would have an opportunity to get into the
details and the specifics of exactly what would be built. We would simply request that you
grant the R-15 zone subject to the condition that the developer submit that application
within a time certain and we can work with you on that time. The developer is suggesting
perhaps six months and that application be consistent with what you are seeing as a
concept plan tonight. If the applicant does not submit the application or the application is
not consistent with what you see tonight as a concept plan then the developer of the
applicant could agree that the R-15 zone designation could be revoked or withdrawn. That
I think in a nutshell is what the applicant is proposed to you. I would be pleased to try to
respond to any questions. Before I let go of it perhaps I should say this, the last time that
we were before the Planning & Zoning Commission they recommended approval of the
project and made that approval subject to a number of conditions all of which were
acceptable to the applicant except for a particular area which is along the southerly
boundary of this proposed senior complex. What Planning and Zoning. Commission
suggested is this property, these lots all be subject to R-8 zone requirements. What the
applicant would like to suggest is that the setbacks for that area be R-8 setbacks but the
lot size be reduced in order to accommodate what we perceive to be the needs of senior
citizens who reside there. The sheet that I presented to you proposed 5,000 square foot
minimum lot sizes along there. It proposes single family detached dwellings along that
entire border and also single story dwellings so that they won't appear to impact the
neighboring properties as significantly as perhaps larger structures. The applicant is
willing to consider virtually any reasonable condition that the Council may wish to impose
upon the grant of the R-15 zone designation. We would be pleased to answer questions
or engage in any discussion you might like to have.
Kingsford: I think very clearly you would be required to have another preliminary plat
because the one you are talking about detached housing they have no property line. I think
at a minimum that would have to take place.
Bradbury: I would expect that you are right, that would be our expectation. But certainly
with respect to the southerly portion you are looking a preliminary plat the northerly portion
the thought is condominiums we probably have to do a condominium plat. So, the
likelihood is we are going to be back in here with plats for those two larger lots again.
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 7
Kingsford: Other questions of the Council?
Morrow: My other questions are, based on the proposal here the applicant has no problem
with the conditional use permit process, time constraints and requirement for re-platting
both of those blocks with respect to the single lot blocks in the condominium.
Bradbury: That is correct.
Kingsford: Other questions of the Council?
Corrie: Mr. Corrie, I had one question on this Exhibit A, this is the area you are talking
about as the R-8?
Bradbury: That is correct, that is the R-8.
Corrie: It has in there R-15.
Bradbury: You are right and that is an error that should be R-8.
Kingsford: Other questions of the Council?
Tolsma: I don't have a question, more of a comment. The R-4 surrounding the area,
surrounding the R-8 is a buffer area that is incorporated by the whole project so that you
are using your own land basically as a buffering for the R-8 and R-4.
Bradbury: That is right and you make a really good point. We could probably even take it
one step further. If you look at the fact that the R-8 is surrounded by the R-4 and then the
more dense development is adjacent to the relatively heavy traffic street and is also
buffered, we attempted to buffer the R-4 to the south with single family detached dwellings
using similar types of setbacks so that impact should be lessened. In addition, I don't
know if it is obvious to you but there is also an access street that comes across the
northerly portion which also helps to buffer some of the potential impacts that the
condominiums or proposed condominium project might have on adjacent or future uses.
Kingsford: Other questions of the Council? What is your pleasure?
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, there is a question in my whether we have current findings of fact or
conclusions.
Crookston: I am almost done with this sheet and I keep all of my notes from the Council
meetings together. We had the public hearing long enough go that I don't have those
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 8
sheets with me so I don't know exactly where we are at. I imagine just using my feeble
memory, but I don't think there were significant, that there was significant testimony at the
City Council public hearing then it becomes a question of whether or not you want to adopt
the Planning and Zoning findings. I would say that it would be appropriate to direct me to
determine whether or not we need new findings and if I determine that we do to go ahead
and prepare them and I could prepare and ordinance if that is your direction. If I determine
that we don't need findings then I should do the annexation ordinance.
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that instruct the City Attorney to determine if findings
of fact and conclusions are in fact needed and if so prepare those as well as prepare an
annexation ordinance if in fact they are not needed and we will address for those issues
at our October 3rd meeting.
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to have the City Attorney to determine if
additional findings are warranted and to prepare an ordinance annexing and zoning, I mis-
understood perhaps your motion, but I think you said to prepare an ordinance if they
weren't needed. I think you want an ordinance prepared either way do you not?
Morrow: That is correct.
Kingsford: Does Council understand your motion? All those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #8: TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE N0. 5 AND 6 BY STEINER
DEVELOPMENT:
Kingsford: At this time I will re-open that public hearing, if there is anyone from the public
that would like to offer testimony you are more than welcome to at this point. I would invite
the developer or his representative to speak first if they choose.
Steve Bradbury, 300 N. 6th Street, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney.
Bradbury: All I wanted to say was that I wanted to have the record. reflect that I would like
to have the comments previously made incorporated into the record of these proceedings
so we have a clear and clean record. I don't have anything in addition to add.
Kingsford: I think the Council probably questioned with regard to the plat do you have any
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 9
other questions Council? Anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony on
this issue, preliminary plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane No: 5 & 6? Seeing none l will
close that public hearing. What is the Council's pleasure with the preliminary plat?
Tolsma: The way I understand it then we are making the preliminary plat for everything
except Lot 8 and Block 10 or Block 5, Block 10.
Kingsford: I think you are making the preliminary plat for the entire parcel with 2 lots that
will have to be re-platted.
Morrow: I think my motion in order to get that accomplished would be that I would move.
Kingsford: Well, we haven't yet annexed it so I think we are probably a little in advance of
ourself.
Morrow: What I was trying to explain to Ron is that if I were doing the motion I would move
to approve the preliminary plat as it is designed and then subject to the conditions of the
conditional use for the two lots and have a time frame and a requirement of a new plat for
each lot.
Kingsford: I think you need to table the preliminary plat until the next meeting so you can
act on the annexation first.
Morrow: So moved
Corrie: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob to table the preliminary plat for the Lake at
Cherry Lane No. 5 & 6 until the next meeting so the property may be annexed, all those
in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #9: TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: RAMON YORGASON: REQUEST FOR
REIMBURSEMENT OF WELL DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR CROSSROADS
SUBDIVISION:
Kingsford: Did you do any research on that Gary with regard to where were we at with the
development and with the pressurized irrigation ordinance and so forth. I think that was
part of the issue last time.
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 10
Smith: I didn't Mayor.
Kingsford: Council have other questions or comments with regard to that request?
Morrow: We haven't basically answered our questions from last time have we?
Kingsford: So far as I know we haven't. I was out of town, I don't know what may have
been passed onto you folks but I have not heard anything.
Morrow: Well, I guess from my perspective, waiting for that information that the
appropriate thing to do is to table until October 3rd so we can get that information here and
then make a decision. Because was there not some question about the procedure under
which the fees had been paid and the status of cross connections and de-hooks and the
system in general and all those other issues?
Kingsford: I believe that is correct.
Morrow: Okay, so I would move that we table until October 3rd pending arrival of
information from staff.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to table the well development fee request for
Crossroad Subdivision until the October 3rd meeting, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Tolsma: Gary, is there a possibility that we could work with this subdivision on the same
master connection we have been using before if that was a problem with some of the
people on the Gross-connections. That if we could guarantee them the water early and
late by a master connection from the City.
Smith: We could certainly look at that if it is, the problem is dis-connecting the residents
from their existing cgnnection.
Tolsma: Then we could probably use part of the reimbursement fees probably for making
a master connection to this thing to guarantee them water.
Smith: Say that again Councilman?
Tolsma: Well I was going to say we could use part of this reimbursement fee if that was
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 11
the issue and use part of the reimbursement fees to put the meter in for the master
connection and the valuing we have to have.
Smith: You mean deduct that amount from the reimbursement.
Tolsma: I think that was the major concern of some of those people out there is they
wouldn't have water in the spring or in the fall.
Smith: Right
Tolsma: But, if we had a master connection in there I think we could probably get rid of the
other connections. I visited a couple people out there, and that was their prime concern
was they didn't have any water in the spring or late fall and they would rather keep on the
city water for that effect. But if they had a master connection which I had told them we had
done other places that the City pushed the water in there a month early and a month late
and the bill went right to Nampa Meridian Irrigation. (Inaudible)
Smith: If Nampa Meridian Irrigation is maintaining the system.
Tolsma: And they said they wouldn't have a problem doing that, other than that they would
rather stay on the City water rather than going to a pressurized irrigation system.
Smith: Well, there is two issues, one would be disconnecting all of the residents from the
existing connection. And they would abandon that connection and their backflow device.
The other would be the City's ability to collect fee for the water that we pump through that
single point connection.
Tolsma: Wouldn't' Nampa Meridian (inaudible)
Smith: If it is maintained by Nampa Meridian then yes we can bill Nampa Meridian for it.
If it is maintained by the homeowners association then we need a separate agreement with
the homeowners association as Wayne explained to me that would ba, would allow us to
bill them and collect from the homeowners association.
Tolsma: Well, the two people I visited with that was their prime concern was what they
were going to do early and late. They said if that could be eliminated then they wouldn't
have any problem with it. That is all I had.
ITEM #10: ORDINANCE #712 - WHITESTONE ESTATES SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION:
Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 12
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS LOT 7, AND A PORTION OF
LOT 8 OF VAN HEES SUBDIVISION, PORTION OF THEW 1/2, E 1/2, OF THE NE 1/4
SECTION /4, T.3N, R.1W., BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like to have
Ordinance #712 read in its entirety? It is the SW corner of Franklin and Linder. Entertain
a motion on ordinance #712 please.
Tolsma: Mr. Mayor I would move that we approve ordinance #712 with suspension ofi the
rules.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve of Ordinance #712 with suspension
of the rules, roll call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #13: ORDINANCE #714 -JACKSON FOOD STORES ANNEXATION:
Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING ANQ ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND
SITUATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 17, SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF
SECTION 16, T.3N, R.1 E, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, BEGINNING ALL
OF LOT 11 OF THE AMENDED MAGIC VIEW SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN ON THE
OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE ADA COUNTY
RECORDER AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAYS AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE. Is there anyone that would like to have Ordinance #714 read in its entirety? This
is across Eagle Road from the St. Luke's Meridian office. Entertain a motion on #714.
Yerrington: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve #714 with the suspension of the rules.
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve Ordinance #714 with the suspension
of the rules, roll call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
• •
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 13
ITEM #14: ORDINANCE #715 -TREASURE VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH ANNEXATION:
Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND LYING
BETWEEN ALL OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1 OF TIMOTHY SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN
BOOK 31 OF PLATS, PAGE 1923, ADA COUNTY RECORDS AND ALSO THE RIGHT OF
WAY OF TEARE AVENUE AND THE CENTERLINE OF OVERLAND ROAD TO ITS
TERMINUS WHICH SAID LOT 2 AND ALSO THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE INTERSTATE
84 LYING ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 2, ALL BEING IN THE S 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF
SECTION 18, T.3N, R.1E, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone that would like to have Ordinance #715 read
in its entirety? Seeing none I would entertain a motion.
Yerrington: Mr. Mayor I move we approve Ordinance #715 with the suspension of the
rules.
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve of Ordinance #715 with the
suspension of the rules, roll call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #16: ORDINANCE #716 -AIR QUALITY ORDINANCE:
Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN REPEALING TITLE VII,
CHAPTER 6, SECTION 612 bF THE REVISED AND COMPILED ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF MERIDIAN RE-ENACTING TITLE VII, CHAPTER 6, SECTION 612 OF THE
REVISED AND COMPILED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like
to have Ordinance #716 read in its entirety?
Yerrington: Mr. Mayor I would like to ask you a question on this, is this the ordinance that
Kuna is not participating in?
Crookston: I believe it is.
Corrie: It is yes. It is not the ordinance they are not participating in, it is just the air quality.
•
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 14
Kingsford: I have a request to read it in its entirety, Counselor would you like to do that
please.
Crookston: Ordinance No. 716, An ordinance of the City of Meridian repealing Title 7,
Chapter 6, Section 612, of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian;
Re-Enacting Title 7, Chapter 6, Section 612, of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of
the City of Meridian; and prpviding an effective date. Whereas, the Mayor and the City
Council of the City of Meridian, Mate of Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest
of the said City to repeal Section 612, Effective Dates, of Title 7, Chapter 6, of the Revised
and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and reenacting said Chapter to provide
new effective dates. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the Mayor and City Council of the
City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1: That Section 612, Effective Dates, of
Chapter 6, Title 7, of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian is
hereby repealed. Section 2: That Section 612, Effective Dates, of Chapter 6, Title 7 of the
Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian is hereby re-enacted and shall
read as follows: 7-612 Effective Dates: This Chapter shall be effective beginning on
January 1, 1991. It shall be rendered null and void on December 31, 1996, but may be
extended thereafter at the discretion of participants in the joint powers agreement. Section
3: Effective Date: Whereas, there is an emergency therefor, which emergency is hereby
declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication according to law. Passed and approved this 19th day of
September, 1995. City of Meridian, hasn't been signed yet, but,. Grant P. Kingsford,
Mayor. Attest, not been signed, William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk.
Kingsford: Other discussion of the Council?
Corrie: Mr. Mayor, the reason for this for the year extension to the air quality board for the
Joint Powers of the different cities in the Ada County is to get them in function for one
more year until the end of December. If it is not done that way then it goes back to State
and the State highway funds and everything else is lost. We don't know what would
happen at that point. But this is a request from the Air Quality Board and also the APA
Board that they extend that one year time.
Kingsford: Any other questions of the Council?
Corrie: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve Ordinance #716 with suspension of rules.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Max to approve Ordinance #716 with suspension
of the rules, roll call vote.
• •
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 15
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #17: AMENDED ORDINANCE #559 - DANBURY FAIR SUBDIVISION:
Kingsford: AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND
ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND
LYING IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 7, T.3N, R.1 E, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY,
IDAHO; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Counselor, what was the purpose
of amending this, do you know what was left out?
Crookston: There were some portions of the property that the legals were not correct and
it really is just a correction of the legal description.
Kingsford: Is there anyone from the public that would like to have #559 read in its entirety?
Seeing none I would entertain a motion on Ordinance #559.
Yerrington: Mr. Mayor, I move for the passage of Amended Ordinance #559 with the
suspension of rules.
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve of Amended Ordinance #559 with
the suspension of rules, rill call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #18: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR WHITESTONE
ESTATES SUBDIVISION BY WHITESTONE PARTNERSHIP:
Kingsford: At this time I will open the public hearing on that issue and invite the owner or
his designee to speak first.
Charles Eddy, 4345 South Timridge Way, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney.
Eddy: The applicant is requesting a variance on the maximum block length of 1000 feet
for one block in the previously approved Whitestone Estates Subdivision. The block in
question is block 8 which is lying in the southern half of the subdivision. Based on
• •
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 16
previous comments that were made by ACHD as well as the City of Meridian we had some
stub streets to help alleviate most of the block length problems. We had the stub street
on a portion of block 2 in Lot 8 of the Van Hees Subdivision that would allow a stub street
to the undevelopment portions of the remaining Van Hees Subdivision. In doing that we
alleviated the minimum block length requirement on Block 2 but were not able to satisfy
the block length requirement on Block 8. ACHD and the City of Meridian have not
requested any more stub streets to the east from Block 8. The applicant understands the
maximum block length requirement is to allow for safety of the lot owners within the
subdivision as well as to promote interaction in the subdivision between neighborhoods.
Emergency vehicles will generally take the least restrictive route to an emergency. Block
8 has two types of access, one from Linder Road and one directly from Waltman Lane. We
feel that the emergency access will not be a hindrance. Granting this variance will not
defer on the applicant any special privileges that have not been allowed to any other
lands. This variance will still comply with the Comprehensive Plan. A favorable decision
concerning this variance would allow the applicant to retain the current lot configuration
and save any cost associated with building a stub street. Profit and convenience are not
the sole reason for this variance request. I will entertain any questions.
Kingsford: Any questions for Mr. Eddy?
Corrie: Mr. Mayor, that is going to be what 1300 feet long?
Eddy: Approximately.
Corrie: Thank you
Kingsford: Any other questions of the Council? Does it require findings Counselor?
Crookston: Yes it does.
Kingsford: Anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony on this variance
to the block length?
Glen Rosenthal, 2295 Verbena, was sworn by the City Attorney.
Rosenthal: I live in Primrose Subdivision which is on the south side of this property, so
you might be familiar with that. This was passed around through the neighborhood and
I think there is, I know other people were planning on being here tonight and there is an
open house at the middle school. The problem we all have is that this entrance onto
Waltman, Waltman is a dead end street that is only about a half mile long. So, like he
mentioned any emergency vehicles, emergency vehicles are still going to come up
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 17
Franklin and Linder and so I don't think. The real problem that we have is Linder now is
becoming a major street and yet is still has no sidewalks, and is extremely narrow and all,
there are a lot of children that live in Primrose that have to use Linder to head down to the
middle school, the elementary school and the high school and that has become a major
traffic area and really to handle traffic from another 145 homes on that we feel is really
excessive. Ideally, the big problem that we see with the plan is that, that number of homes
should somehow have access to Franklin Road. So that is the reason that I am here
tonight because as my wife and I discussed this we see a real problem with it. We lived
here just a few years and we have seen what the Crestwood Subdivision has done to the
traffic on that street. We are really-concerned about that many more cars with such limited
access onto Linder. Every car in that Subdivision is going to be on Linder. That is all I
have, we just think, feel that there is just not enough, there are too many homes without
access onto Franklin.
Jay Atwood, 2290 Verbena Drive, was sworn by the City Attorney.
(End of Tape)
Atwood: My concern was the traffic, the same as my neighbor. Everything is going right
out on Linder Road and they should have access on Franklin which I don't think they get
or should be able to get down to there. Because 145 homes is over 300 vehicles, there
are 2 per family plus all the kids cars. There is just too much traffic, I drive that night and
morning, I live down on the end down there. It is just too much traffic on there is my only
concern.
John Maebitt, 1135 Laurel Court, was sworn by the City Attorney.
Maebitt: Point of clarification I guess more than anything. This subdivision has already
been approved in concept has it?
Kingsford: More than in concept, it has been approved. At issue is a variance.
Maebitt: The only issue tonight is the variance? Could you tell me where your legal
notices are published, I haven't seen anything in the Statesman?
Crookston: They are not published in the Statesman, the Valley News which is published
in Meridian is the ofFcial newspaper of the City of Meridian. That is where the notices are
published.
Kingsford: And then people within 300 feet have to pe noticed by mail.
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 18
Maebitt: A personal complaint I think that a subdivision this size notifying people within
300 feet is not sufficient. My personal experience is the road services on Waltman and
Linder are really substandard road services. Unless those roads are completely rebuilt
with a better surtace, sidewalk, curbs and gutters, the comments of my neighbors really
would pertain to the request for variance as it applies to emergency vehicles and access
to the subdivision. If they used the roads as they currently is there is going to be a real
problem.
Kingsford: Thank you John, anyone else from the public?
John Jaques, 1090 Lavender Court, was sworn by the City Attorney.
Jaques: Well, I share the concerns of the people who talked previous. Three Hundred
feet, 145 homes definitely affects more than 300 feet from the property. The traffic is like
everybody else has said terrible. They put a four way stop there to try to get Franklin onto
Linder at 5:00 traffic you area 1/4 mile 1/2 a mile down the street. What is this 145 homes
going to do to this Primrose Subdivision where everybody is on wells. Is it going to affect
the water, has there been any studies done? Has there been any studies done as far as
trafFc, schools, shopping, medical facilities. Has any of this been taken into consideration?
I haven't seen anything or heard anything. Living that close we didn't even know this was
taken place or being annexed or anything until we received this a week ago or week and
a half ago. I think everybody in the sub shares the same opinion that they weren't notified.
If it was a 5 or 10 home subdivision plot they are doing that is fine but 145 homes that is
a lot more people than the people 300 feet away. I think we need to look at what impacts
this is going to do for schools, shopping, gas stations, well water that whole subdivisions
everybody is on wells. Has anybody looked into that stuff or have there been any studies
done?
Kingsford: The water issues have been studied, those issues that the City of Meridian
controls they have been studied. Obviously we don't control the schools or the highways.
We have researched the water and sewer issues yes.
Jaques: If they have done the studies can we have access to them to see what the results
are?
Kingsford: Certainly, it is public record you bet.
Jaques: Who do I see?
Kingsford: City Engineer, we have a very detailed water facilities plan and sewer facilities
plan and you are very welcome to look at it.
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 19
Jaques: So it is a done deal and they are already going to, it is annexed. What about the
Primrose Subdivision is that annexed into the City or do they have plans to do that?
Kingsford: So far we have not annexed except that which has been requested to be
annexed. I am sure there will come a time when to clean up some of the jagged edges the
Council might determine to force annexation but we have never forced annexation in the
City of Meridian.
Jaques: But this has all been annexed that they are proposed on this plot right here?
Kingsford: That is correct.
Jaques: And that is what you just voted on earlier?
Kingsford: No, excuse me item 10 was the annexation ordinance yes.
Jaques: I didn't understand what you were doing there and we waited for a chance to get
up and find out what in fact they were doing.
Kingsford: At the last meeting we had a public hearing on that annexation.
Jaques: So there will be studies done on traffic, the highway department is in charge of
that?
Kingsford: The Ada County Highway District is involved in that. Mr. Morrow is the head of
the Ada County Citizens Advisory Board for that, he might be able to answer your
question.
Morrow: To answer part of your questions and part of your neighbors questions with
respect to the issue of traffic, there are traffic studies by ACHD for each subdivision as a
requirement for ACHD approval. To bring you up to speed with what is generally planned
for that area, to answer your questions about the intersection of Franklin and Linder.
Franklin Road from Linder to East 1st and then Meridian Road south back onto the
freeway or to the East 1st intersection. In Ada County Highway Districts work program
those had been scheduled for right of way acquisition in 1996, rebuild in 1997. The design
for all of that to a five lane status to and including the rebuild of that intersection has been
done. Unfortunately in the budgeting process ACHD opted to move the right of acquisition
to 1997 and the rebuild to 1998. A prototype of what you see for that road system is what
is currently been done on Cherry Lane from Linder through Black Cat. And the
intersection onto the west of Black Cat, how it tapers back in. The other 3 legs of that
intersection would be fairly similar to what you see on the southwest and north side of
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 20
Black Cat and Cherry Lane with respect to Linder Road. The long term proposal for that
road and it is a section line road is to make that a five lane road to an including a freeway
overpass. Now, obviously that is 10 to 15 years down the way and if all of those things
are contingent upon funding at some point in the future. So there has been within Ada
County massive steps for planning of collectors and major thoroughfares and then for each
subdivision that is done ACRD requires a traffic study. You could get copies of that traffic
study from ACRD. The gal's name that handles our area is Karen Gallagher, normally she
is at these meetings. Why she is not here this evening my guess is there is not major
issues for ACRD so there is no reason for her to be here. Does that help answer some of
your questions?
Jaques: Well yes and no. It helps, but does the Council, are they interested in what
impacts this subdivision going to have on traffic, is anybody interested in finding. these
studies out on the Council to get their input.
Morrow: We see all of these studies as part of our packets, they are presented to us. The
City of Meridian also has a citizens advisory committee that meets in January of each year
that determines the transportation needs for the entire community. That is essentially an
area that is bounded by Cloverdale on the east, Chinden on the north, the County line on
the west, and Lake Hazel on the South. And so that committee studies the major traffic
issues yearly and then reports its findings to ACHD. And those findings are incorporated
as part of the County wide transportation program. Each community within Ada County is
the same thing. So we have access and certainly you as a citizen once those
presentations are made to us they become part of public record and could have access
to any of that information simply on request.
Jaques: So what you are basically saying is you are going to go ahead and let them slam
this subdivision in and then by 1998 they may do something about Linder Road maybe
5 or 10 years down the road they may widen it and make it go over the freeway?
Morrow: Not necessarily, in this particular case it has been talked about before, this
property has no access to Franklin Road. There is no way we as a Council can force
somebody to sell to this subdivision. What we can require and what has been
demonstrated on the plat tonight is stub roads into adjoining properties so at which point
those properties developed then that traffic from this subdivision as well as future
subdivisions would flow out to Franklin Road. But in our type of system of government we
can't force property owners that are adjacent to this to sell property to these folks to make
a traffic circulation work. What we can do is require the subdivision to have the stub roads
so that when those other properties come along then it doesn't impact other areas.
Jaques: Yes but, this 145 homes and 300 and some cars that doesn't affect just Franklin
i
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 21
Road and Linder, that affects the traffic from the freeway exit, to Meridian, to Franklin Road
to Cherry Lane. That is just not Linder and Franklin we are talking about, they are all the
same size roads. The problem is not going to be just there on Linder it is going to be
everybody getting off the freeway or from Chinden to that subdivision and everybody else
in there in Primrose.
Morrow: Part of the system is that each mile road, each section line road will be a five lane
road within our area. There is also a future on off ramp planned on Ten Mile and the
freeway. There are overpasses planned for each road that doesn't have on/off ramps
which is Locust Grove. Currently there is one at Cloverdale. We have an exit ramp at
eagle there will be ultimately an overpass at Locust Grove. There is an on/off ramp at
Meridian Road, there would be an overpass at Linder. There would be an on/off ramp at
Ten Mile and then an overpass which exists currently at Black Cat. So the issue is that
there has been substantial long term planning done for all of these things there is no doubt
about it. There will be some uncomfortable or some tough times between now and
eventual build out.
Jaques: I can see it doing it in the future but I am just wondering how many hundreds of
homes you are going to do in Meridian before they decide to address the traffic problems.
I mean, is it going to be, that is my concern.
Morrow: Part of the issue is that you and I as taxpayers in order to fund those things also
have to have the commercial, industrial and residential development to provide the tax
sources to fund those things. So it is kind of a catch 22 deal.
Jaques: If you can see my concern.
Morrow: I understand your concern.
Jaques: They put in this 145 homes and the roads are going to be taken care of in 1998
or 1999 and they put in 500 more homes over here and the roads are going to be taken
care of 2000, 20001. Is this a big snowball that is going to hit us all at once and everybody
is going to say we don't like Idaho anymore we are going to go somewhere else. It is too
nice of a place to live to have that happen. I think you guys are doing a pretty good job
but I just if you guys have seen the area if there has been any study done if you have
reviewed them and stuff like that before.
Morrow: We try to be sensitive about that. A large part of the problem quite frankly is as
you well know in the mid to late 80's as an area and as a State we made a decision to
aggressively pursue industry to and including governor scholarship to keep our (inaudible)
in terms of our students. The issue is we have been pretty successful. Contrary to popular
•
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 22
opinion, contrary to what a lot of folk would have you believe most of the growth that I see
within Ada County is self generated within the borders of Idaho. It is our own kids staying
home. And the issue is if we are going to provide jobs for them we also have to provide
places for them to live. And so the bottom line here is that after World War II and the
Korean War most people born and raised in Idaho had to leave to make a living. Our
parents and grandparents. Now those folk are coming home and our kids our staying
home. So, a large part of the problem is us.
Jaques: I don't have any problem with that, but I had seen this snowball thing I am talking
about happen in different cities and they are running me out. A lot of people that I knew
that grew up there progress is fine.
Tolsma: (Inaudible) Walt is saying there, every time we have an annexation come before
us or a plot of ground no matter how many houses (inaudible) or whatever. We get input
from the school districts here on whether they can accommodate the children and where
they can accommodate them or how they can accommodate them. We get input from the
Ada County Highway District on the road studies whether we can handle the traffic,
whether they think we can handle the traffic and what we are going to have to do. The fire
department comments on this, the irrigation districts comments on it. And everything
comes to us in a packet and if any one of those say we can't handle this or we can't do it
then we have to look long and hard if we can't put it together. We have our own water
service and our police service and fire and sewer and everything like that but we know in
the City (inaudible). ACRD controls the roads and they say whether the roads are able to
handle it and if they come to us and say we can't handle it then we have to turn it down.
If they come to us with a recommendation and say well it doesn't impact the traffic flows
will meet what our criteria says for that amount of road then we have no legal grounds to
turn it down. Here you can't turn something down unless there are legal grounds to turn
it down. Because the developer (inaudible) even though the impact might be greater here
than what it is on the other side of town. The School District they send us a letter stating
that children might not necessarily be able to go to school in this area but we can handle
them. (Inaudible) so we have legal guidelines here we have to follow at the same time
and we are relying on the information that these other agencies sent to us. If that
inforri~ation is false and we go ahead and do it we have no recourse (inaudible). We have
a whole list of agencies about this long and everybody has to submit something. This is
what (inaudible).
Jaques: Well you know that is a concern and (inaudible) homework then it should be fine.
But like the school thing, we fought that when they started going the year round stuff and
that is what they had to do to accommodate the people in the area that were moving in and
(inaudible) what not. What are they going to do next, they just had the one last year that
failed, how, it is all fine and say they can handle it and they can do. And when it comes
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 23
right down to it they go second rate and they end up changing it again in the short period
and it costs them more money. You have answered most of any questions, my biggest
concern was everybody was focusing on that one little area of 300 feet and Linder and it
is way bigger than that. That is what I was concerned about.
Kingsford: The true reality is we won't be able to go out there and pheasant hunt and all
of those things we used to enjoy. The trade off is that there are some other things that we
benefit from and the people will never be happy, I will not be happy with it, but we try to
do the best with it that we can.
Jaques: Well, progress is here and there is nothing wrong with it as long as everybody is
doing their homework and it is taken care of. Thanks.
Kingsford: Anyone else from the public?
Rosendal: The one thing as Mr. Morrow obviously knows his business, but he said at one
point he made the statement there is sufficient long term planning and I think I would be,
I think all of us would raise an issue with what is sufficient.
Kingsford: A relative term
Rosendal: Exactly, to say in fifteen years from now they are going to make Linder a five
lane road over the freeway. Somebody says it is sufficient but fifteen years behind the
times maybe. That is the whole problem, the real problem I have, the other issue I want
to mention is on the north, south and west of that property everything there is at least a
one acre lot size. That is the reason we purchased our home in there is that is what
attracted us to the area is that it was on an acre and surrounded by acres. That is a quality
of life because we have lived in subdivisions similar to this one that is proposed here. The
problem is the density causes a lot of problems. My problem is that all of a sudden to have
145 home on that small of a property I think the lot size is too small. Maybe it is too late
to bring that issue up here but that was the real issue was for that area to put in that many
homes on that small of a property if there was half as many homes on there so the lot
sizes were bigger then the same thing that solves a lot of the traffic problems, school
issues and a lot of the other things. The other thing is the only stub road goes out to the
west. Some day when there is an overpass at Ten Mite to think that somebody is going
to go from that stub road out to Ten Mile to get on the freeway to go back to Micron is a
little bit optimistic. Because still everybody is going to be heading, the bulk of the traffic
in Meridian is heading east . So that is the problem and that is why we keep focusing on
this. We understand that and I am not all for progress and I understand that there are
going to be a lot more homes built in Meridian and that all of the adjoining property around
there is going to be homes someday. There is no stub road out towards Franklin, I know
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 24
there is a ditch there but that, I think that should be incorporated into the plan and that may
not even affect the block. The other problem is all of those houses along Linder are all on
acre lots at least or larger so they don't have sidewalks or any of that problem. That was
the other real problem that I see is that Linder is such a rural road for a long time in the
future that I see that there is a real problem with getting the kids safely to them from the
schools. So those are the couple of things. And on the other issue I had written down
wasn't there at one point that Waltman was supposed to go through to Meridian and it still
is as I had heard.
Kingsford: It would be a realignment I believe isn't it Walt?
Morrow: It is a realignment, it is somewhat contingent upon development through there.
It won't be built as part of the
Kingsford: It won't go down actually to Waltman but there will be a street that goes to
Meridian Road to the east.
Rosendal: Will it connect on to Meridian Road where Waltman is there at that end?
Kingsford: No, the CH2M Hill plan calls for that not to even go onto Meridian Road at that
point.
Rosendal: Waltman comes out actually onto Meridian right there.
Kingsford: Right, but it won't, that will not go out onto where the main highway, where
Meridian Road goes into East 1st there. That stubs there and they have a street design
further to the north that goes onto both Meridian Road and then onto East 1st.
Morrow: It is generally in the neighborhood of where all the equipment is, generally in that
neighborhood.
Kingsford: I think they looked at two different things either the storage area or that
equipment rental.
Rosendal: I know there is a problem with where the Waltman doesn't connect well but I
had heard that had been stopped. That is the other problem until that is built or depending
on how it meanders through there if that is going to offer any relief at all. That was the big
issue that I had with this and again we weren't, we live 1/2 mile or mile away but yet we
are going to be driving by that many times a day and to have all of these 1 acre homesites
and then all of the sudden have an area that is densely a problem so that was our big
concern.
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 25
Kingsford: Of course the issue of delivering services of sewer and water to acre lots is not
very practical and you are talking about very expensive lots and the Central District Health
virtually won't allow additional septic tanks anymore. So you are talking about central
sewer on anything new. I don't know that you can develop one acre lots and have them
sell today at the price you would have to get into one.
Rosendal: And that is the whole problem is that is the issue that everybody always says
that the developers pay part of the way. But the developer comes in and buys part of the
land and can sell 145 home sites and then he doesn't live there.
Kingsford: With the development (inaudible) the developer never pays for any of that.
That is the consumer that buys that.
Morrow: One comment if I might, Glen I agree with the planning is sufficient the
implementation of some of these things where we are at others people mercy is sometimes
not real good.
Richard Taylor, 1095 Larkspur, was sworn by the City Attorney.
Taylor: Some of the comments, all of the comments here are what I have been thinking.
I have seen a couple things here that looks to me like you very possibly have a piece of
property here that really isn't fit for subdivision when you don't have only one access. One
entrance, one exit. If you have for example a fire truck come out there and lay out and the
streets are blocked they would really get upset about you driving across their hose. If you
have somebody in the backside of the property maybe using (inaudible) heart attack and
they can't get to him. Where are you, where is that family. Or what if it is me ten years and
it happens to me and they can't get to me because that street is blocked off because of
that addition there. Very possibly the cart is before the horse here. Maybe the streets
should be improved prior to that subdivision coming in. There have been a lot of subs that
have been turned down because of inadequacies (inaudible). I really think that the people
that live out there now, you are asking them to sacrifice what we moved out there for so
this can happen. I don't know as anybody lives in that area that puts up with this. Do you
live in our subdivision?
Morrow: No, I live on Franklin Road, just a 1/4 mile west of there.
Taylor: Well, I have seen what has happened to our Linder Road, I think the police
department has been out there too watching what is going on and the ability of people to
stop at those stop signs doesn't happen. Anybody that lives down the other way, I mean,
we even went down there and put what part of stop don't you understand. You get close
to 7:30 in the morning and it is a hassle. It is a safety factor too. The more people you have
•
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 26
the more speed you have. That is just about all I have to say. I think there are a lot of
people in our area that are suffering and sacrificing for this lot that wants to be developed.
Very possibly with one access, it has to be said no, I know it has already been said yes.
I think you see what I am saying. Thank you.
Kingsford: Anyone else? Has everyone else had a shot first please?
Jaques: Where are they going to be bringing in the sewer and water and power and
everything? Is that going to tie up Linder Road while they are doing this whole
subdivision? Is the sewer line that runs down Linder is that going to be the access?
Kingsford: Do they bring it across Linder or do they bring it from Franklin Gary?
Smith: Both sewer and water comes in from Linder.
Jaques: So Linder Road is going to be torn up to do alt of this.
Smith: The water is in Linder right now and the sewer will cross Linder and going back into
the Landing Subdivision.
Jaques: I don't know that you have enough road there in Linder to tear up again. It was
torn up about every section of it.
Smith: No, I say the water is in Linder on the east side right now. The sewer will cross
Linder to go into the Landing Subdivision. It will be a crossing of Linder.
Jaques: (Inaudible) simple think like putting in the sewer line just stock piles (inaudible)
back behind it.
Smith: The sewer will cross Linder, it won't be down the length of it.
Jaques: (Inaudible)
Kingsford: Anyone else from the public? I will close the public hearing. You need to direct
for findings.
Gorrie: Mr. Mayor, I move that we direct the attorney to prepare new findings of fact and
conclusions of law.
Yerrington: Second
i
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 27
Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Max to have the City Attorney prepare findings of
fact and conclusions of law based on the testimony, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: Those findings will be reviewed and approved at the next meeting. Once they
are approved the public is welcome to review those.
ITEM #19: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A QUICK LUBE SHOP BY JAY
BURRUP:
Kingsford: Does the Council have any questions of Mr. Burrup or his designee?
Tolsma: (Inaudible)
Kingsford: You are talking about the Seat Cover Factory I am right on that and it was at
one time an oil changing establishment. I guess I am a little puzzled, I didn't have a
chance to visit with Shari. I am a little puzzled as to why you need a conditional use permit
for something that was built for that purpose.
Crookston: Because it is a change of use.
(Inaudible)
Kingsford: Could we get you to step to the microphone sir.
Burrup: My name is Mel Burrup, I am the father of Jay Burrup is for this conditional use
permit. Shari stated that anything that has been closed for a year then it has to comply
with a conditional use, it is like it was never granted originally. But this facility was built
specifically for a quick tube shop and operated for a about a year or a year and a half. My
son bought and put a floor over it a plywood floor and operated it as the Seat Cover
Factory for about 8 years. After substantial studying he decided that a return on the
investment would be much better for him as far as being able to stay there. He would like
to bring it back to the other, the seat cover business would be on the east side of the
building. There is room there 17 by 53 by 11 feet high that was a car wash at one time
when it was operated originally by the original people as the quick tube they had the car
wash on the east side. The seat cover business will be moved over there and operated
from that when it is changed to this if you approve it of course.
Kingsford: Any other questions of Mr. Burrup? What is the Council's pleasure?
•
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 28
•
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the or adopt the findings of fact and
conclusions of law as approved by the P & Z.
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt,- second by Ron to approve of the findings of fact and
conclusions of law as adopted by P & Z, roll call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE,: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: Is there a motion on the decision?
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the conditional use permit requested
by the applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth
in the findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of the Conditional use permit for a
quick tube conditioned on the conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions
of law, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #20: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A NAIL SALON BY GRETCHEN
SHERWOOD:
Kingsford: Does Council have questions of the applicant?
Morrow: Could we have the applicant make a short presentation to us?
Kingsford: Would you make a brief presentation as to your intents and so forth.
Sherwood: Do I just
Kingsford: Outline where you are at and what it is you plan to do.
Sherwood: I have one room out of my home, I am on the corner of 2nd and Ada. I am
already in the process of remodeling it to the specifications of the board of cosmetology
•
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 29
•
for a nail shop. I would be the only nail technician in there and I would be working part
time having about 15 to 20 clients a week.
Kingsford: Any other questions then of the Council? Thank you. What is the Council's
pleasure?
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the findings of fact and conclusions of
law, I am sorry I would move that we adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of law as
approved by P & Z.
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of
law as prepared for P & Z, roll call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: Is there a motion on the decision?
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the conditional use permit requested by the
applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the
findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of the conditional use permit as set
forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #21: GERRY SWEET: CONCERNS ON PROPOSED EXPANSION OF CHERRY
LANE GOLF COURSE:
Kingsford: I do not see Mr. Sweet, we will move on then.
ITEM #22: LOUISE BRONSON: BUS SERVICE FOR MERIDIAN:
Kingsford: Are they aware of the time and place of the meeting?
• •
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 30
(Inaudible)
Kingsford: I guess we can't hear from Louise either then.
ITEM #23: COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR LA PLAYA MANOR:
Kingsford: Has Counsel reviewed those?
Crookston: Yes I have.
Kingsford: What is your finding?
Crookston: They are fine.
Kingsford: Is there a motion for their approval?
Morrow: So moved
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of the CC&R's for La Playa Manor
Subdivision, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #24: DEPARTMENT REPORTS:
Kingsford: I see several of you sitting here that I know had some concerns with regard to
the items that were tabled. Do you wish clarification on that do you know what we did
there?
(Inaudible)
Kingsford: I didn't want you to sit here thinking this was great fun and not being heard. Mr.
Smith?
Smith: Mayor and Council, the first item I have on your agenda is I would like to initiate
whatever is required to annex the waste water treatment plant property into the City. I
don't know who starts that process. Councilman Morrow and I have discussed that and
we feel that it is necessary for us to have that property within the City limits. So we feel we
don't need to deal with the County on expansions and so forth at that site.
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 31
Kingsford: We are contiguous now with that?
Smith: No sir.
Kingsford: We would have to go through the process that, you can annex non-contiguous
property for specific things and as I recall a treatment plant is one of those. So, that is the
process we are looking at?
Crookston: I believe that is true I have read it.
Kingsford: I know that it is true of airports, I am pretty sure it is true of sewage treatment
plants and water treatment facilities.
Crookston: I believe that it is, but I will look at that.
(Inaudible)
Kingsford: Review that and if that is not the case then Gary I would ask you to look at an
annexation chain that might be amenable to that.
Morrow: We have and very candidly we have and Ten Mile Road we have one little slice
of property between
Smith: Hartford Subdivision I believe it was the northeast corner of Ten Mile and Ustick.
Morrow: The Wilder property, one little slice of property between Ten Mile Creek and the
Wilder Creek
Smith: Five Mile Creek
Kingsford: That is on the east side.
Morrow: On the east side that would make us contiguous by virtue of Ten Mile Road to our
property. So at the very worst we would need to annex a piece of unusual property that
we believe belongs to Leonard Husky and Five Mite Creek to get to our property.
Kingsford: What is the width of our property there Counselor, would that constitute a
shoestring in your opinion?
Crookston: It depends on how much property we are annexing.
•
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 32
•
Smith: I would say probably 100 feet across the common boundary between Husky and
ourself. Including across Ten Mile Road that is I think about 100 foot on frontage,
somewhere around that.
Kingsford: 100 feet is probably not considered a shoestring. Well, look into, I think the
most prudent matter is if we can legally do that without it being contiguous if that is not the
case then Gary if you would have some of your staff maybe get in touch with Mr. Husky
and see if that is a possibility.
Smith: Yes sir, thank you. The second item are bid results for the Meridian Greens Pump
Station, Pump Addition. I will hand those out right now. We had two bidder submit on the
project. This is to add another booster pump into the Meridian Greens Booster Pump
Station. This is a 25 horse power variable frequency drive pump. It is about 1000 gallons
per minute capacity at full speed.
Kingsford: Gary the engineering was done for this at the time that other pump was placed
was it not?
Smith: The installation of the pump station, the piping was done at that time. All we are
adding is a pump and motor to the existing piping correct. There is of course some
modification to the electrical controls to provide starter for the motor. Two bidders
submitted bids on September 15 at 3:00 they were opened in City Hall. Riverside Inc. from
Parma submitted a bid of $23,485.50 and Caron Pump Company of Boise submitted a bid
of $30,949.00. Riverside is the low bidder, their bid has been checked and all is in order.
I would recommend that the bid be awarded to them. I noted for your information that they
have built pump house No. 15 for us. They have pulled our pumps they test pump our
wells and they have rebuilt our pump motors. They have always done a very good job and
they are responsive to us especially on an emergency basis.
Kingsford: I assume that is your recommendation then?
Smith: Yes sir
Kingsford: Entertain a motion to approve the low responsive bidder.
Morrow: So moved
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of Riverside Electric from Parma's
bid in the amount of $23,485.50 for the additional booster at the pump house No. 15 all
~ ~
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 33
those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Smith: Thank you, I have the notice of award for you to sign Mayor, would it be appropriate
at this time to authorize your signature on the agreement, the contract and the notice to
proceed once necessary documentation is submitted back to us from the contractor?
Kingsford: Entertain a motion to authorize the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest.
Yerrington: So moved
Morrow: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Walt to authorize the Mayor to sign and the City
Clerk to attest those documents required for this booster, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Smith: One other item I might mention is I put in each one of your boxes today a synopsis
of the ACHD's work schedule for 1996 as was submitted to me. I just received that the
other day Councilman Morrow. I kind of re-capped it on the sheet for you so you could see
what was being planned by the Highway District in terms of what they submitted to us.
That is for your information. If you have any questions let me know and I will try and get
some answers for you.
Kingsford: Thank you Gary. Can I, Gary, ask you, t have had several calls and I checked
with Lieutenant Bowman, I guess through Jean Moore today. We have had numerous
calls with regard to the trucks that park on Fairview opposite the Express Cafe and it
makes it kind of an unsafe condition at the daycare. Could we get some help from you to
help the police department on signage out there to expedite that a little bit. Thank you.
Yerrington: Mr. Mayor, the Chief has written a letter.
Kingsford: I am aware of that but they have had several near misses today again on that.
So I think we need to try to expedite it. Shari?
Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, I had a couple of items today, one is regarding a dental lab
at 1608 Meridian Street. A few months ago Chuck Palmer had notified me that he was
interested in a tenant for that building. It is a building just north of the existing day care that
they have done some remodeling on. Apparently it used to be an apartment complex. (End
• •
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 34
of Tape)
Stiles: They have just put some siding up on it and redone the doors and windows in it.
Then they paved the parking lot. What I had told Mr. Palmer was that a dental clinic was
a permitted use in that zone, a dental lab was a conditional use. What happened was
when I saw that the Palmer's had finally paved their lot in looking at what they had done,
Bruce Freckleton and I were driving past and Bruce noticed that they apparently had the
day care now in this new building and not ever having come to the Council on this
particular facility raised a red flag. That is when Bruce, Daunt Whitman, the Building
Inspector and Skip Voss the Fire Marshall went to visit the site to see what was happening
there with the concern for no occupancy on that building. When they got there they did
find that there was a dental lab there. In talking to the gentlemen, these two are the ones
that would be running the dental lab, I believe that the ordinance was written to require a
lab to have a conditional use in that zone because of some of the hazardous chemicals
that they might use such as acids and some heavy metal work, pressed gases that would
be permitted if it were a dental clinic which would also mean additional traffic, more cars
back there. What these gentlemen propose and if you would like they can explain their
process more. They are making dentures and orthodontic appliances, I am being coached
here. I don't feel and I talked to John Shawcroft and I don't believe Skip Voss actually
believes that there is a hazardous element to this. But because Daunt and Skip were really
backing me up by closing them down. I would rather that you make the decision whether
they could go in there without having to wait for the Conditional Use Permit. The did
rent/lease the facility in good faith that it was a permitted use. I believe that Chuck Palmer
believed it was a permitted use. I think it is pretty benign use compared to a clinic as far
as what could happen in a dental clinic there. I would ask that agree with me that they
should be allowed to proceed with their operation there without going through the
conditional use permit process.
Tolsma: (Inaudible) after school day care facility and was going to apply for a conditional
use permit for that. (Inaudible) same building here, the green building.
Stiles: Yes, it is separated by a partition within the building. It is not accessed through the
same openings, is that right?
Tolsma: So we have 2 operations actually going to proceed in the same building then?
Stiles: The Palmer's I was a little more concerned about that one and they have applied
for a conditional use for the day care portion. They were confused about the process and
I feel that they should go through the conditional use process because of some of the
problems we have had.
C~
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 35
•
Tolsma: Do you feet they should (inaudible) same basis then on the day care (inaudible).
Stiles: I don't really believe that no.
Tolsma: Why is that?
Stiles: Day cares in the City require conditional use permit, all facilities require conditional
use permit.
Tolsma: What I am asking is if these gentlemen are allowed to operate this business while
waiting on a conditional use permit.
Kingsford: She is suggesting they don't have a conditional use permit, that it is so close
to a clinic that she is suggesting they don't need it and she wants Council confirmation on
that. I think that is what (inaudible).
Stiles: The problem is our ordinance defines a dental clinic and that is they have clients
come in and see patients and they could do any number of operations within a dental
clinic. This I believe everything is mailed in or shipped in some form, they pick up or
deliver they say. We don't have a definition for a laboratory. Because they don't fit the
definition for a clinic and there is a no definition for a laboratory, they call themselves a
dental lab, they would call themselves a dental studio if that would help.
Tolsma: Let me ask you another question then, with this operation in this end of the
building (inaudible)?
Stiles: I don't believe so not anymore than, that is the reason I felt the day care should go
through the conditional use because of the traffic and crossing of the roadway there. They
do need to get their certificate of occupancy and the building department and Fire Marshall
have told them they will not issue them a cert~cate of occupancy until they go through the
correct procedure.
Tolsma: What I was after was if he has already applied for a conditional use permit for a
day care and allow this (inaudible) what is going on. That is why I was asking if there were
two businesses (inaudible).
Stiles: They have a couple of other issues that is behind the existing day care that they
have. They are running a vacuum center I believe and it has been a woodworking shop
back there #hat is I think more an issue on the day care then they would, more of an impact
than a dental lab would have. Keeping in mind that a dental clinic could be in there with
no kind of conditional use at all.
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 36
Tolsma: (Inaudible) that is all I as after.
Kingsford: Any other questions of the Council? What is your pleasure?
Morrow: I don't have a problem with the distinction. If the clinic thing is a proven use and
this seems to be a process that could easily go on within a clinic but it is a specialized
process it is not part of a clinic I don't think it is a big stretch to get there.
Corrie: It is more semantics than anything else.
Kingsford: Is there a motion to that effect?
Morrow: So moved
Corrie: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob not to require a conditional use permit and to
designate a dental lab as being an acceptable use in that zone, all those favor?
Morrow: I would like to make the motion subject to staff approvals be the building
(inaudible).
Kingsford: Poll the second?
Corrie: Yes
Kingsford: Restate the motion?
Morrow: My motion is to allow the use of a dental lab without requirement of a conditional
use permit but subject the lab to the building and life safety codes.
Corrie: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob to not require the I~b to have a conditional use
permit but that they meet staff requirements particularly the life safety and building codes,
all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Stiles: And I believe we can take care of that though the certificate of occupancy.
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 37
Morrow: That would be correct.
Kingsford: Anything else?
Stiles: I have one more, I got a letter from Vickie Welker. Ms. Welker has rented the home
at 1302 East 1st. This is the home directly north of the post office. It shows on our zoning
map as being R-15 but in fact it was rezoned I believe within the last 5 years to a C-G
zone.
Kingsford: That was done, we did the Spencer's home, Hartwell, Jim Shearer all in that
same one.
Stiles: She has requested that she be allowed to operate a commercial real estate office
in the home and also live in it. I know we have had troubles in the past with particularly
the Sciscoe incident where we had to have a variance to allow them to live in the home
because of the zoning. I don't really think that is an appropriate way to handle something,
like that. If Council thinks it would require conditional use permit or something like that,
there are a lot of uses of this same type with running an office and also living in the home
on this street. What she is basically asking for here is that she be allowed to open her
office and not pave her driveway until July 1st of 1996. Apparently this is because of the
cost that she is renting and apparently the owner cannot afford to give her an
consideration for paving that at this time. I guess it is strictly up to you if you want to allow
her until July 1st. In her favor she has been very upfront about what she is doing and trying
to go through the appropriate channels to get approved. She is just asking for some
consideration on this. I wanted to hear what your thoughts were.
Kingsford: Well, I think that there are several businesses in that close proximity that people
both reside there and that is their business on either side of the street. I am not so sure
about the driveway whatever Council feels there. I think we would be somewhat out of line
to tum this one down when the property just to the north is unoccupied and it is an office.
Morrow: I guess I don't disagree with that. I guess my only thought would be with respect
to the asphalt situation. We did that once before for a place and two or three years later
it was like pulling teeth to get it done. t guess my feeling here is that I don't have a
problem with what she wants to do but I think that she should be notified from my
perspective that July 1st deadline is kind of cast in stone. Either do it or be gone. In
defense of the other ones with the exception of Mr. Shearer who had essentially
grandfather rights the ones on the south side, I am sorry the west side of the street pretty
much have made sure that they got their parking lots in and their conversions and stuff
went on. I am thinking specifically with respect to Faye Brewer and then the additional
uses of the Sales and so forth up and .down the street.
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 38
Kingsford: Some of those took some time but probably Faye would be a little bit angry at
you for not calling her a Buchanan now. But I think some of those did take some time,
Faye's development she worked on that over a period of time and the Sales did as well.
Morrow: I don't have a problem with what we are doing.
Corrie: Oh, I think Mr. Mayor that she is being upfront with us I think we can go ahead and
do it. I think she is honest enough to do it knowing her so I don't see a problem with it.
Kingsford: Is there a motion in that regard?
Morrow: So moved
Corrie: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Bob to approve of Vickie Welker operating and
residing in that residence on 1st Street and allowing to July 1st, 1996 to pave, but stipulate
not later than, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: Lieutenant Bowman, anything to report from the Police Department? Mr.
Chairman?
Johnson: Nothing.
Kingsford: Mr. Sweet, you are late but you have the floor.
Sweet: The agenda looked so long tonight I didn't think you would get to me until about
midnight. t appreciate the opportunity to come in at this time. I would like to pass out to
you Mr. Mayor and the Councilmen and the City Attorney a list of questions that I have
drafted concerning the proposed expansion of the Cherry Lane Golf Course. In the
interest of brevity and time I would just like to go through and read the questions. But I
would hope that I could get a written response from the Council and Mayor and possibly
the City Attomey as appropriate. That way I don't expect to spend a lot of time going over
the questions. The reason I want to submit these questions is I have been discussing this
issue with a number of individuals from the City both people in the business community
and many people from the residential community. I thought the best way to approach this
was to come in with a series of questions and see what type of answers would be provided
by these various officials within the City. If I may, I would like to go ahead and read the
questions into the public record. These would be addressed for the Mayor, the Councilmen
•
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 39
as well as the City Attorney. I am submitting these questions concerning the proposed
expansion of the Cherry Lane Golf Course in the hopes that they may help facilitate the
best decision possible on behalf of the taxpayers of Meridian. I would appreciate your
written response to these questions so that I and other concerned citizens in Meridian will
have a better understanding of this whole situation. Additionally the answers to these
questions may help provide the taxpayers of this community with a fair market return on
their investment. I sure appreciate all of your time and consideration. Question #1, are you
satisfied with the current lease between the City of Meridian and Cherry Lane Recreation
Inc. Do you believe that the payment of $6000 per year as proposed in the lease for
expansion of the Cheny Lane Golf Course to 18 holes provides a reasonable return to the
taxpayers of Meridian when our neighbors in Nampa generate approximately $125,000 per
year from their 18 hole golf course. Question #2, it is my understanding that you estimate
a cost of approximately $870,000 to complete the remaining 9 holes at the Cherry Lane
Golf Course. $350,000 of that has been budgeted from the sewer and water enterprise
fund leaving a balance of $520,000. Where will this balance of money come from and
what assurances do we have that will be available when it is needed. What written
contracts or guarantees do we or will we have on the repayment of the $350,000 to the
sewer and water enterprise fund? What will happen if Cherry Lane Recreation defaults on
the repayment of the $350,000 loan. If the houses adjoining the golf course are not
completed within a certain of time and therefore the $650 per home latecomer fee is not
collected in a timely fashion will the developers be required to pay off the loan. If not
where will the money come from to complete the course. Is all of the land in the existing
9 hole golf course is deeded to the City of Meridian? Is all of the land in the proposed 9
hole expansion deeded to the City of Meridian. If not what problems might this cause?
Question #4, whatever so called formal agreements exist between Cherry Lane Recreation
and the City of Meridian in addition to the formal pledge of Cherry Lane Recreation to build
a new clubhouse? Is it prudent for the City of Meridian in protecting the best interest of
Meridian taxpayers to be involved in these informal agreements? Question #5, is there
any legitimate reason why the City of Meridian needs to rush to finalize the proposed
expansion dealings considering the fact that the current lease extends through October
2, 2003? Question #6, do you believe it would be reasonable for the City of Meridian to
explore the possibility of renegotiating the lease with Cherry Lane Recreation when
comparing the $6000 per year payment received by the City of Meridian versus the
apprpximate $125,000 per year received by the City of Nampa for their 18 hole golf course.
Question #7, what is the current s#atus of the proposed expansion plan between the City
of Meridian and Cherry Lane Recreation? Specifically what steps have already been taken
and what is the proposed methodology and time frame proposed for completing the
expansion plan? Final question #8, what will the proposed $6000 per year lease payment
for the 18 hole course be appropriated for by the City of Meridian if the proposed
expansion is completed? I sincerely appreciate your consideration of these questions and
look forward to your written response to these questions.. I believe the answers to these
•
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 40
questions will help ensure the taxpayers of the City of Meridian will receive a fair market
return on any investment made by public officials on their behalf.
Kingsford: Thank you.
Sweet: Thank you Mr. Mayor and Councilmen and Wayne.
Kingsford: Mr. Crookston?
Crookston: Were we going to discuss the impact fee ordinance and things like that
tonight?
Kingsford: I believe it was the Council's vote, I could stand corrected to draw that
ordinance up?
Crookston: That was brought up, it came up recently though that we have not stepped
through all the procedures that we need to go through.
Kingsford: Which would be?
Crookston: I had notes on the whole thing and somehow I left them at the office so I went
through the development impact fee statute and wrote out some of the comments that I
had in my notes. There are things that are required in the statute that to my knowledge
are not in the prospective ordinance that we had from the City pf Boise. It is supposed to
provide for a refund of development impact fees if it meets certain requirements. There
is supposed to be a procedure for timely processing of applications. Provide a detailed
description of the methodology which costs per service unit are determined. Schedule of
impact fees for various land uses (inaudible). There is supposed to be a development
impact fee advisory committee which we had initially but to my knowledge that is not in
effect now. I think that is something that needs to be reinstituted. They are supposed to
assist in the review of the capital improvement plans and any proposed amendments to
that. Under the procedure for imposition of development impact fees. We have done this,
the capital improvements plan shall be delivered in coordination with the development
impact fee advisory committee. There is supposed to be a public hearing held to consider
adoption of the capital improvements, we have done that. To my knowledge we have made
some changes since that was done. We are supposed to have additional hearings after
those changes were made. I have not been involved in the total procedure all the way
through but the public notice on those hearings is supposed to include a statement that
the governmental entity shall make available to the public upon request the following,
proposed land use assumptions, copy of the proposed capital improvements plan, a
statement that any member of the public affected can get the capital improvements plan
~ !
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 41
and has the right to appear if the governmental entity makes a material change is what I
already mentioned if they make a material change they have to have more, may have
hearings. Following adoption of the capital improvements plan a governmental entity shall
conduct a public hearing to consider adoption of an ordinance. We have not had the public
hearing for adoption of the ordinance. There are, there is supposed to be a plan or a
schedule to determine the proportion that share determinations which include, you have
to show how any appropriate credits are handled and the off sets or contribution of money,
dedication of land. Whether or not payments reasonably anticipated to be made by or as
a result of new development in the form of users fees are handled and credited. We do
have the capital improvements plan, That portion of the capital improvements plan which
is attributable to determining the development impact fee may be funded at one time at the
(inaudible) levy which I think the City needs to consider. The capital improvements plan
shall contain all of the following, a general description of alt existing public facilities and
their existing deficiencies, to my knowledge that is not in the plan that we have. A
reasonable estimate of all costs, we have some cost in there. A plan to develop funding
resources. A commission by the governmental entity to use other available sources of
revenue and analysis of the total capacity level of current usage and commitments of
current usage of capacity. A description of the land use assumptions, I don't think that we
have that. A definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use. A description
of all system improvements and their costs necessitated by and attributable to new
development. The total number of service units necessitated by and attributable to new
development. The projected demand for system improvements required by new service
units. Identification of all sources and levels of funding available. Schedule setting forth
estimated dates for commencing and completing construction of all improvements
identified in the capital improvements plan. We have a schedule
Kingsford: I think Wayne what I would like to see you do rather than read that damn thing
to us is to outline what it is what we have to do. I think the Council clearly has requested
that we move forward on it. Outline what we need to do and let's get on with it.
Crookston: I'd agree, I just had so many questions about it because I hadn't been involved
in the whole process.
Kingsford: Bob, could you contact those members of your committee and ask if they would
be willing to continue to serve as members of that committee?
Corrie: I will do it tomorrow.
Kingsford: Anything else?
Crookston: Yes, we had made demand on the Alidjani's to do some improvements to the
•
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 42
old, old high school. We have received a letter from Mohammed stating that he had
boarded up many of the openings to the school. I have not been to the school to look at
it and Shari is not here. It is my understanding, did you go over Will?
Berg: I went with Skip Voss.
Crookston: And what is the appearance as to whether or not there is access to the
building?
Berg: He boarded up and put locks on doors to all shall I say ground level openings
windows and doors. He made a valid attempt to lock it up.
Kingsford: How difficult is it to still get in?
Berg: If you had an ax, if you had a crow bar.
Kingsford: It would require breaking and entering to do that?
Berg: Yes
(Inaudible)
Crookston: What I was wondering is do you want to submit a letter to them stating that
they have done what we asked or do we want to make sure that they have. If they have
not
Kingsford: Let's have one or two Councilmen be involved in that letter or that inspection
and make recommendation on the letter. If you all would take a look at that then and
advise Wayne as to what that stands with regard to that letter.
Berg: Wayne what date was that?
Crookston: September 12th.
Berg: Okay so the next day is when I went with Skip. So from now to then I don't know
what kind of shape it is in,
Cowie: I visually checked it, I saw what you did. I am going to walk through it and around
it with him.
Berg: There was also some graffiti on some windows and Moe said it would take care of
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 43
that right away,
Kingsford: What else Wayne?
Crookston: That is all.
Kingsford: Mr. Morrow?
Morrow: A couple things I had a question on with respect to trash billings for and I brought
this issue up last time. We would handle that in a strategic planning session I am
presuming. The next point that I kind of wanted to make is if we ought to in the short term
bump up our strategic planning meetings because the issues we have to deal with with
respect to the comprehensive plan, the zoning and development ordinance, the impact fee
and so on and so forth. We have an awful lot of ground to cover and not a lot of time to get
it covered. It seems to me that if the personnel manual is going to be an indicator of how
fast we are going to get things done we need to bump up the time or the amount of
meetings so we can get pressing on. We do have a couple of new employees that will be
coming on to serve functions after the first of October that we do need to have some
guidance for and those kinds of things done to go along with their training. It looks to me
like we are out of time and we need to go forward. Just a comment. That is it.
Kingsford: Mr. Yerrington?
Yerrington: Nothing your honor.
Kingsford: Mr. Corrie?
Corrie: Nothing
Kingsford: Ron?
Tolsma: No, (inaudible).
Kingsford: Well, Walt with that in mind what is your pleasure, is it your interest then to
meet on the 26th?
Morrow: I would think so.
Kingsford: That will have us meeting every Tuesday this month.
Morrow: I would think we need to do that for the next couple of months.
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 44
Kingsford: You wouldn't consider doing it after the first of the year would you?
Morrow: No
Kingsford: Okay
Tolsma: Mr. Mayor, I might bring up this letter that Janice Gass brought to me today.
Kingsford: I had planned to bring that up. Have you all reviewed this? Wayne, I think you
are aware of some of those things. Did you receive this letter?
Crookston: It may be in my box, I did not pick up the material in my box.
Kingsford: This is of course those things that resulted in the IRS and that IRS audit is I
might say in conflict with our auditors view point of the law. I don't know who is right and
how you get that determination. We need to do something with regard to the enumerated
eight issues here I guess.
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, if I might in my normal monthly meeting with my accountant I asked
him about this issue which was on, I talked with him on Monday, yesterday. Apparently this
process is starting back east, it is being fairly aggressively pursued. So this is not a little
bit unusual and he had been to a recent seminar put on by a guy from Boston covering this
very issue and these actions. And the long and short of it is, his advice to me was that we
aggressively pursue these areas that appear to be gray areas so that they are settled and
officially to us. The point that he brought is if you conceit some of these issues it opens
up later issues with respect to lawsuits brought about by legal companies with respect to
people that may have been defined as sub-contractors but now are being defined as
employees and brings up benefit issues, retirement issues and all of these other kinds of
things. Back east some of these entities are having to pay hundreds of thousands of
dollars from their budgets to fund the difference between an employee and a sub-
contractor. So his advice based on that recent seminar that he had attended was that we
aggressively pursue contesting these issues.
Kingsford: Would it be your recommendation then that we have our auditor actually Jo's
boss respond his viewpoint on these issues then and submit that to IRS?
Morrow: I would think so, I would think that we go jointly and press forward.
Kingsford: Would you pursue that then at the CCFOA conference in McCall with her. Any
other discussion on that?
• ~
Meridian City Council
September 19, 1995
Page 45
Berg: I do want to make a point that there are some good points that we are going to
change just because of our lack or inability or personnel manual all together that we are
going to make some changes anyway. (Inaudible)
Kingsford: Anything else Ron? I would entertain a motion to adjourn.
Corrie: So moved
Yerringtorl: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Max to adjourn, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:38 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
APPROVED:
GRANT P. KINGSF R YOR
ATTEST:
ILLIAM G. BERG, JR., LERK
r ~
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1995 - 7:30 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: ~~~~er-~--
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: ~~'~-~v~e~
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 12, 1995: Q~jo~~.e~
1. MARSHALL BAKER, EXECUTIVE OF PHYSICIAN SERVICES: SPECIAL
ANNOUNCEMENT FOR ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL:
P~S~, Line's ~1Q~idiaK fylPdicu~ ~ew~te~- ~~
2. TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: CC&R'S FOR SALMON RAPIDS SUBDIVISION:
3. TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: CC&R'S FOR LOS ALAMITOS SUBDIVISION:
~~.6~ ~~ Off- ,3~' ~~,
4. TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR WATERBURY PARK SUBDIVISION
N0.5 BY RAMON YORGASON: ~~ ~ ~~~~~~
re~~i~ed ~~e !,~-~-~ ~ Oct- ~ -
5. TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST
FOR SALMON RAPIDS SUBDMSION N0.3 BY FARWEST DEVELOPERS
6. TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SALMON RAPIDS
SUBDIVISION N0.3 BY FARWEST DEVELOPERS: ~cb~e r~-~fiZ
~~~. 32-= `~-
7. TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST FOR
THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE N0.5 & 6 BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT:
8. TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE N0.5 ~ 6 BY
STEINER DEVELOPMENT: ~~~ ~'~ O~-~ ~~h ~~
9. TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: RAMON YORGASON: REQUEST FOR
REIMBURSEMENT OF WELL DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR CROSSROADS
SUBDIVISION: ~~ /ri~~ ~_ ~'
10. ORDINANCE #712 - WHITESTONE ESTATES SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION:
11. ORDINANCE #713 -LOS ALAMITOS SUBDIVISION N0.3 ANNEXATION:
~ab~e~ U~~e Oct- .~~?b
12. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LOS ALAMITOS SUBDIVISION NO.3 BY FARWEST
DEVELOPERS TABLED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995: ~y~2ect~ ~'l
G~~~. 3 R2
13. ORDINANCE #714 -JACKSON FOO STORES ANNEXATION:
a~O,pr~pv~
14. ORDINANCE #715 -TREASURE VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH ANNEXATION:
~~~~v-~
16. ORDINANCE #716 -AIR QUALITY ORDINANCE:
~~~ray~
17. AMENDED ORDINANCE #559 - DANBURY FAIR SUBDIVISION:
u~/Jro try
18. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR WHITESTONE
ESTATES SUBDIVISION BY W IT STONE PARTNERSHIP:
C~i~y a earn ey .~ prep a.~,e, ,~~ ~CIC
19. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQ~EST FOR A QUICK LURE SHOP BY JAY
BURRUP: a/,pr~v~e ~'/~' , efC ~-r,.-~e .~~~ ~~r~'.r~~
GL~pr~v-e C~-~dr~-.~-6,.P ua.P ~2~rr~'
20. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A NAIL SALON BY GRETCHEN
SHERWOOD: ~z~pr~ve ~~~' ~ e /~ ~~- ~~ O~r2 ~~=vn.:s.T:~
~,~prove Cvr~di~'i~.a.~ cue /1e~i~n.i~
21. GERRY SWEET: CONCERNS ON PROPOSED EXPANSION OF CHERRY LANE
GOLF COURSE: hot here.
22. LOUISE BRONSON: BUS SERVICE FOR MERIDIAN: riot /~~~
23. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR LA PLAYA MANOR:
a~P~~~
24. DEPARTMENT REPORTS:
A. GARY SMITH, CITY ENGINEER:
1. INITIATE ANNEXATION PROCESS FOR WASTE WATER PLANT: --eh-
2. BID RESULTS -MERIDIAN GREENS PUMP STATION ADDITION: ~.
~pf,''rov~ Ciwa~r.el ~ ~,`v~i~a5'id-~~ ,one,
B. SHARI STILES, PLANNING & ZONING ADMISITRATOR:
1. DENTAL LAB AT 1608 MERIDIAN STREET: ~pp~n~a u~-
` CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC MEETING SIGN-UPS SHEET
o nl ~~ R ~b ~e-~ ~~S 3 ~r .~1 /
`~ CITY OF MERIDIAN.
PUBLIC MEETING SIGN-UP SHEET
l'i~i ~o~~ ~~,G 9-/9- ~S
NAME PHONE NUMBER
~' I~\~,) ~~~oL.L SGrs A °~CU~
A ~s
~~~~~
~ .- ~ ~
~ a w .v
w W ~
aN
a
~~
m
U
~ gm~
~ ¢~
u~ -
JL~-
~rr
~c~vEu
SEP191995
J ~ ~~+ qTY OF MERIDIAN
JL t Lui~ce NEWS
M®c~cal C®nter FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ~~~ ~~ ~~'
September 19, 1995
~~~~
4~ON~8
:~ oo°~ Information Contact:
Nadra Angerman Kellogg
Public Information Office
(208) 381-2002
ST. LUKE'S ANNOUNCES NAME FOR MEDICAL CENTER IN MERIDIAN
Meridian, Idaho -- St. Luke's announced today that the name for the new St.
Luke's site in Meridian will be St. Luke's Meridian Medical Center.
Located at I-84 and Eagle Road in Meridian, Phase One of St. Luke's 130,000
square foot Meridian Medical Center will provide a full range of outpatient and physician
services including an urgent care and surgery center serving residents of Meridian, west
Ada County and Canyon County. The Meridian Medical Center will offer a host of
services. including immediate/walk-in care .and ambulatory services, seven days a week,
1.2 hours a day, for residents of Meridian, west Ada County and Canyon County. Other
services will include, diagnostic services (laboratory, x-ray, EKG), primary care,
specialty care, rehabilitation services, a Breast Cancer Detection Center, pharmacy, home
health, conference rooms, and patient education services.
The Meridian Medical Center is part of St. Luke's overall mission of taking
services to the people where they live and work. It is designed to maximize the
convenience and timeliness of services to outpatients.
"Our objective is to make St. Luke's Meridian Medical Center a model facility in
every way, for the patients who will use the services and for the physicians and staff
- more -
•
Meridian Medical Center 2 - 2 - 2
providing those services," said St. Luke's President Ed Dahlberg. "One very exciting
part about this project is that we will be able to offer the very best elements of St. Luke's
at this new facility in Meridian, with the entire project being designed to meet the desires
of the local residents," Dahlberg added.
St. Luke's Regional Medical Center will employ approximately 100 positions to
manage and staff the primary, specialty, and diagnostic care and administration at the
Meridian Medical Center. In addition, more than 35 physicians will see patients at their
Meridian offices.
These physicians have established practices in Boise and are expanding their
offices to the new location to better serve patients located in the Meridian area.
Physicians who have surgery privileges at St. Luke's Regional Medical Center in Boise
will have outpatient surgery privileges at the new Meridian Medical Center.
St. Luke's staff have worked to design a medical center that is based upon the
services needed by people residing and working in the area. "Growth in the Meridian
area and other sections of western Ada and Canyon counties have created an environment
where residents are requesting more conveniently-located services, including health
caze," explained Dahlberg. Demographic studies have shown that next yeaz more than
110,000 people will reside west of Curtis Road and the population will grow at 4-5
percent each yeaz. "The most needed, most cost-effective primary and outpatient services
will be provided in Phase One of the project, and local citizens will help to identify future
needs," Dahlberg added.
St. Luke's Meridian Medical Center is scheduled to open in Spring, 1996.
###
•
St. Luke's Meridian Medical
Progress Report
September 19,1995
RECEIVED
}~ ~S~EP 1 9 NJ95
Cen'QiY OF MERIDIAN
C/~ l~~
• Approximately 75 people are working daily at the site, from a variety of trades.
• Construction crews have erected steel for the basement and all floors of the building.
Construction of the fourth level's (roof) mechanical equipment housing will begin
next week (9/25).
• Light weight concrete, for the first, second, third, and fourth levels, has been poured.
• Basement: Framing complete, 20 percent of drywall complete
First Floor: Framing complete, 50 percent of brick exterior complete.
Second Floor: Framing 75 percent complete.
• All utilities (water, sewer, power, gas, phones, and fire hydrants) are in.
• Crews will drill a private emergency well with full installation by October.
• Landscaping and irrigation are near completion.
• Concrete curbs and sidewalks are complete. Fifty percent of the asphalt parking,
driveway, and walking path paving is complete.
• Signalized intersection on Eagle Road is under construction.
• St. Luke's Meridian Medical Center is scheduled to open in the Spring of 1996.
RECEIVED
SEP191995
St. L-uke's Meridian Medical Centeno C!~~~DIAN
Questions and Answers `' l
~~
The mission of St. Luke's Regional Medical Center is to improve the health status of our
regional community by providing access to a full, integrated range of safe, clinically
effective and financially efficient health care and related services, offered in convenient
locations through a regional system which links physicians, St. Luke's staff and other
health care providers.
Pursuit of this commitment requires ongoing study and analysis of the changing
community in order to ensure thoughtful decisions in the wide community's best
interests, in order to respond with the provision of services that fill existing and projected
needs.
St. Luke's identified that certain needs exist in the Meridian area. Growth has created an
environment where thousands of people wish to have convenient and direct access to
health care services.
St. Luke's intends to meet these needs through the provision of ambulatory health care
services that complement the high-technology inpatient and support services offered at
the central campus of St. Luke's. As the dynamics of the community change and health
care progresses, future plans for the Meridian campus will be evaluated and acted upon in
accordance with the stated commitments.
Why now?
Current population in West Ada County (which included Meridian and surrounding area,
Kuna, Eagle, and Star, and the area from Cole Road to Cloverdale) is over 100,00 persons
and this population will continue to increase at a rate of 4-5 percent per year. We think
St. Luke's has a responsibility to offer a range of services and programs within its general
and specialty areas, as identified as needed and wanted services by the local populace.
Why there?
That's where the growth is and that's where the needs already exist. It's true that the
demographics are changing, but it is also true that the way health care is delivered is also
changing.. We are today an "in and out society.' Outpatient care--that does not require an
overnight hospital stay--is becoming more and more common. And, Meridian area
residents would prefer to stay in their own community for routine tests, for physician
office visits, or for minor walk=in/urgent care services. That is what they have told us in
numerous surveys. As the pace of our lives increases, were are all looking for ways to
1
simplify or streamline. It is important for people to obtain appropriate, high quality care
in close proximity to their homes or businesses. We think it is St. Luke's responsibility
to provide that care.
Why 37 acres? -
Flexibility is the key when preparing for community health needs, particularly when
serving a large and rapidly growing area. Having this mass of land affords us maximum
flexibility in our planning. And, what we plan in health care today will be serving many
generations of Idahoans at that site. This is the beginning of a hundred-year project.
What will you do there?
Initially, St. Luke's plans athree-story facility and parking areas that will occupy
approximately seven of the 37 acres that St. Luke's now owns. This 130,000 square foot
facility will house an urgent care center plus a surgery center, diagnostic services
(laboratory, x-ray, EKG), primary care physicians, specialty physicians, rehabilitation
services, Breast Cancer Detection Center, pharmacy, home health, conference rooms,
patient education.
Completion date is set for Spring, 1996.
Who is making the final decisions?
The St. Luke's Regional Medical Center Board of Directors makes all final decisions. Of
utmost importance to them and to St. Luke's officials, however, is to ensure that what is
offered ends up being what the local citizens need and want. St. Luke's spent several
months inquiring from local leadership, citizens groups, physicians, and others in order to
make the most appropriate and highly recommended service decisions before plans were
drawn. We feel confident that what is proposed is most appropriate.
How will St. Luke's pay for the property and building?
The monies come from reserves set aside in the past by the Board of Directors for
investment in new equipment, facilities, renovation and property acquision. Long ago, it
was determined that St. Luke's could not serve its ever widening communities with the
best and the latest in health care at just one site in Boise. Sooner or later, it was felt, the
services would be best provided in local communities.
2
Will there eventually be a hospital at this site?
There aze no current plans for a hospital with inpatient beds. However, as the area
continues to grow and health care delivery changes, ongoing evaluation of the need for
additional facilities and services will occur.
How does this extension relate to the St. Luke's mission?
St. Luke's has consciously chosen to build upon the strengths it has developed over the
years, and to continue long-standing commitments to this area. By extending our service
azea and making quality health caze more accessible to those who need it, we continue to
add value to the community we serve. That is St. Luke's tradition, and we will explore
the best ways to continue to make that occur.
Will you be duplicating any of the costly equipment or
specialized services available at the St. Luke's complex in
Boise?
The only services or programs that St. Luke's offers that will be duplicated at the St.
Luke's Meridian Medical Center aze those that have been proven to be needed. Initially
the emphasis is on ambulatory caze and diagnostic capabilities. As in all cases, St.
Luke's chooses not to duplicate expensive technology or programs unless or until there is
a proven need. In other words, the costs need to be weighed against the potential benefit
for the users of the services; they will receive value for their health caze dollazs.
3
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk
JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer
GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt.
SHARI S. STILES, P & Z Adm.
PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor
KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief
W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney
COUNCIL MEMBERS
RONALD R. TOLSMA
MAX YERRINGTON
ROBERT D. CORRIE
WALT W. MORROW
P & Z COMMISSION
JIM JOHNSON, Chairman
MOE ALIDJANI
JIM SHEARER
CHARLIE ROUNTREE
TIM HEPPER
RECEIVED
SEP 1 9 1995
TO: MAYOR & COUNCIL CITY OF MERIDIAAI
C,l~ ~~
FROM: Gary D. Smith, P.E.
"~ ~ ~a _
RE: BID OPENING - "MERIDIAN GREENS PUMP STATION PUMP /~
ADDITION"
MEMO
S HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY •
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813
Public WorksBuilding Departrnent (208) 887-2211
Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
September 15, 1995 - 3:00 P.M.
Bidder
1. Riverside, Inc. -Parma
2. Caron Pump Co. -Boise
Amount Bid
$23,485.50
30,949.00
Riverside, Inc. is the low bidder on this project and I would recommend that the bid be awarded
to them.
Riverside, Inc. has built Pumphouse No. 15 for us; has pulled our pumps; test pumped our wells
and rebuilt our pump motors. Their work has always been very good and they have been very
responsive to our needs especially on an emergency basis.
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk
JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer
GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
JOHN T SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt.
SHARI S. STILES, P & Z Adm.
PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor
-KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief
W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney
• •
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
CITY ®F 1dIERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813
Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211
Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
•BLACK CAT #106 -Replace bridge on Black Cat, south of Ustick, over Safford
Sublateral. (Construction) .Start 12-1-95 End 4-30-95
CITY OF MERIDUN
,c.~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor & City Council
From: Gary D. Smith, PE
RE: ACHD 1996 WORKS DUCE
MINOR BRIDGES:
The following is a preliminary list of project candidates for ACHD FY 1995-96.
1.
2.
•BLACK CAT #105 -Replace bridge on Black Cat, south of Ustick, over Eight Mile
Lateral. (Professional Services, R/W Acquisition)
•FRANKLIN #170C -Replace bridge on Franklin Road, west of Ten Mile, over Kennedy
Lateral. (Professional Services, R/W Acquisition)
Creek. (Construction)
•LIlVDER #224 -Replace bridge on Linder Road, south of Franklin, over Ten Mile
ROADWAY PROJECTS:
GOUNGIL MEMBERS
RONALD R. TOLSMA
MAX YERRINGTON
ROBERT D. CORRIE
WALT W. MORROW
JIM JOHNSON, Chairman
MOE ALIDJANI
RECEIVED JIM SHEARER
CHARLIE ROUNTREE
TIM HEPPER
SEP191995
September 18, 1995
Start 11-1-95 End 3-31-96
•CHERRY LANE, BLACK CAT TO CINDER -Reconstruction and roadway widening;
includes curb, gutter and sidewalk, bike facilities for two miles of roadway.
(Construction Carryover)
•Overlays with Rotomilling (Urban)
-W. 8th St. -Pine Avenue to Cherry Lane
-Fairview Ave. - E. 1st St. to Locust Grove Rd.
•Overlays without Rotomilling (Rural)
-Black Cat Road -Cherry Lane to Ustick
-Black Cat Road -Franklin Rd. to Cherry Lane
-Ustick Road -Locust Grove Rd. to Eagle Rd.
3. INTERSECTION PROJECTS:
•CHERRY AND TEN MII,E -Signal Installation. (Professional Services)
4. TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECTS:
•EAGLE ROAD - ST. LUKE'S TRAFFIC SIGNAL -Material purchase for the traffic
signal to be installed on Eagle Road at St. Luke's driveway. (Materials)
•MERIDIAN INTERCONNECT & MASTER -Installation of traffic signal interconnect
in Meridian to allow coordinated signal operation and communication.
(Professional Services)
5. RIDESHARE PROJECTS:
•PARK/RIDE IlVIPROVEMENTS -EAGLE/OVERLAND - Construct a Park & Ride
lot at the northeast corner of Eagle and Overland (CMAQ). (Construction)
September 13, 1995
Commercial Executives
PO Box 888
Mericiiar~, Idaho 83680
208-888-5600
RECEIVED
SEP191995
his. Sherry Stiles
City o.f. ~Reridian
_ - Planning & `Lonin<~
33 East Idaho
Administrator
P~eridian, Idaho 83642
Dear Sherry;
GTY OF MERIDIAN
~/e into,
.~ /-'~ ~-
I have recently rented 1302 East ist, Meridian, to establ~_sh
a commercial real estate office under the nan~~e of Commercial
Executives. As I understand it, the property is zoned CC; however,
the provision for paving the driveway has not been completed since
the rezone was approved.
A & S~ Construction and Pinnacle Engineers have given me
bids for tope, drainage, drawings, calculations, grading, and
paving totaling approximately $2,500. Since this is a cost
which is usually required of the property owner; but is now
being requested of me in order to put up signs on the property
so that I can open my office for business, I am herein asking
that the City of Meridian allow me to open my office for oper-
ation by putting up appropriate signage upon receipt of this
request. Tn exchange I shall agree to pave the driveway based
upon approved engineering drawings no later than-July 1, 1996.
My bids are good until then and this will allow me to get the
operation under way with operating .capital coming in prior to
facing this expense. The driveway is currently set up to provide
for 2 off street parking spaces with a turn~a-round in addition
to a one car garage for parking my car. The ordinance calls fdr
one space per 400 sq. ft. I will not be using 800 sg. ft. for
office so I will exceed the recruirenient.
I appreciate your prompt consideration and look forward to
hearing from you as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
~~-~~,-
Vicki Welker
-S=toker
QUESTI•NS REGARDING THE PR~POSED
EXPANSION OF THE CHERRY LANE GOLF COURSE
September 19, 1995
Mayor Grant Kingsford
City of Meridian
Dear Mayor Kingsford:
RECEIVED
SEP191995
carr of a~e~iuuN
~~
I am submitting these questions concerning the proposed expansion of the Cherry Lane
Golf Course in the hope that they may help facilitate the best decision possible on
behalf of the taxpayers of Meridian. I would appreciate your written response to these
questions so that I and other concerned citizens in Meridian will have a better
understanding of this whole situation. Additionally, the answers to these question .may
help provide the taxpayers of this community with a fair market return on their
investment. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Question #1
Are you satisfied with the current lease between the City of Meridian and Cherry Lane
Recreation, Inc.? Do you believe that the payment of $6,000 per year, as proposed in
the lease for expansion of the Cherry Lane Golf Course to 18 holes, provides a
reasonable return to the taxpayers of Meridian when our neighbors in Nampa generate
approximately $125,000 per year from their 18 hole golf course?
Question #2
It is my understanding that you estimateit will cost approximately $870,000 to complete
the remaining 9 holes at the Cherry Lane Golf Course. $350,000 of that has been
budgeted from the Sewer & Water "enterprise" fund, leaving a balance of $520,000.
Where will this balance of money come from, and what assurances do we have that it
will be available when it is needed? What written contracts or guarantees do we, or will
we have on the repayment schedule of the $350,000 to the Sewer & Water "enterprise
fund". What will happen if Cherry Lane Recreation, Inc. defaults on the repayment of
the $350,000 loan. If the houses adjoining the golf course are not completed within a
certain period of time, and therefore the $650 per home "late comer fee" is not collected
in a timely fashion, will the developers be required to pay off the loan? If not, where will
the money come from to complete the course?
Question #3
Is all of the land in the existing 9 hole golf course deeded to the City of Meridian? Is all
of the land in the proposed 9 hole expansion deeded to the City of Meridian? If not,
what problems might this cause?
Question #4
What other so called "informal agreements" exist between Cherry Lane Recreation and
the City of Meridian in addition to the informal pledge for Cherry Lane Recreation to
build a new clubhouse. Is it prudent for the City of Meridian, in protecting the best
interests of the Meridian taxpayers, to be involved in these "informal agreements"
• Page 2
Questloih.;#5
Is there any legitimate reason why the City of Meridian needs to rush to finalize the
proposed expansion dealings, considering the fact that the current lease extends
through October 2, 2003?
Question #6
Do you believe it would be reasonable for the City of Meridian to explore the possibility
of renegotiating the lease with Cherry Lane Recreation, when comparing the $6,000 per
year payment received by the City of Meridian versus the approximate $125,000 per
year received by the City of Nampa for their 18 hole golf course?
Question #7
What is the current status of the proposed expansion plan between the City of Meridian
and Cherry Lane Recreation. Specifically, what steps have already been taken, and
what is the proposed methodology and time frame proposed for completing the
expansion plan?
Question #8
What will the proposed $6,000 per year lease payment for the 18 hole course be
appropriated for by the City of Meridian if the proposed expansion is completed?
I sincerely appreciate your consideration of these questions and look forward to your
written response to these questions. I believe the answers to these questons will help
insure that the taxpayers of the City of Meridian will receive a fair market return on any
investment made by public officials on their behalf.
Sincerely,
Mr. Gerry Sweet
2567 NW 12th
Meridian, ID 83642
887-1085
r s
AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 559
AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND LYING
IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 7, T.3N., R.lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE. DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of
Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of
said City to annex to the said City real property which is
described in Section 1 below:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council
of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho:
Section 1. That the real property described as:
A parcel of land lying in the NE 1/4 of Section 7, T.3N. ,
R.lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described
as follows:
y PARCEL ONE:
~ 5 ~ 7 + 1 9 7Commencing at a point marking the section corner common
~ (~ to Sections 5, 6 and 8 and the said Section 7;
~1, ..
~ ~
' ~ ~ ~"``` ~ ~'' Thence North 89°28'06" West 347.91 feet along the
,.:. ~ G
'`` Northerly boundary of the said NE 1/4 of Section 7 to a
n ,. ~- ~ ~ point;
~Gi~ ,~
Thence South 0°26'54" West 29.07 feet to a point on the
'95~U~ ~~ fl~};_ ~outh rly right-of-way line of Fairview Avenue;
~/~4 ~ nce South 22°23'00" West 87.14 feet to a point;
RECD"~'~`' "` '~~~ Thence South 0°26'54" West 326.80 feet to a point;
Thence South 84°44'00" West 339.00 feet to a point;
Thence North 87°19'04" West 50.03 feet to a point;
Thence South 0°51'54" West 49.00 feet (formerly
described as South 0°O1' West) to a point;
Thence South 65°47'54" West 276.30 feet (formerly
described as South 64°57' West) to the REAL POINT OF
BEGINNING;
Thence South 27°51'06" East 150.00 feet (formerly
described as South 28°42' East) to a point;
AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - DANBURY FAIR Page 1
Thence South 19°52'06" East 114.70 feet
described as South 20°43' East) to a point;
Thence South 31°08'06" East 73.70 feet
described as South 31°59' East) to a point;
Thence South 47°52'06" East 131.00 feet
described as South 48°43' East) to a point;
Thence South 42°57'09" East 66.00 feet
described as South 42°39' East) to a point;
Thence South 29°47'09" East 94.00 feet
described as South 29°29' East) to a point;
(formerly
(formerly
(formerly
(formerly
(formerly
Thence South 0°52'09'° East 178.61 feet (formerly
described as South 0 ° 34' East 165.0 feet) , to a point on
the Southerly boundary of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of
said Section 7;
Thence North 89°57'09" West 647.02 feet (formerly
described as South 89°45' West), to a point marking the
Northeast corner of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said
Section 7;
Thence South 0°30'58" West 1,085.96 feet along the
Easterly boundary of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said
Section 7 to a point;
Thence South 89°33'52" West 95.00 feet to a point;
Thence South 0°30'5.8" West 25.00 feet to a point;
Thence South 89°33'52" West 566.78 feet to a point;
Thence North 0°32'59" East 731.99 feet to a point;
Thence South 89°33'52" West 360.36 feet (formerly
described as West 359.0 feet) to a point;
Thence North 0°34'58" East 1,059.89 feet (formerly
described as North 1,023.0 feet) to a point;
Thence South 89°42'38" East 1,020.34 feet (formerly
described as East 1,019.00 feet) to a point on the
Westerly boundary of said NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said
Section 7 to a point;
Thence North 0°30'58" East (formerly described as North
0°34' East) 417.98 feet along said Westerly boundary of
the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7 to a point;
Thence North 90°00'00" East 246.56 feet to a point;
Thence South 25°01'06" East 39.74 feet (formerly
described as South 25°52' East) to a point;
AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - DANBURY FAIR Page 2
Thence South 89°33'22" East 33.83 feet (formerly
described as South 90°00'00" East) to a point;
Thence South 00°35'39" East 224.17 feet to a point;
Thence South 00°26'42" West 126.08 feet to the Real
Point of Beginning, comprising 46.45 acres more or less.
AND
PARCEL TWO:
A parcel of land being a portion of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4
of Section 7, T.3N., R.lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho and more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a point marking the section corner common
to Sections 5, 6 and 8 and the said Section 7; thence
North 89°28'06" West 347.91 feet along the North
boundary of the said NE 1/4 of Section 7 to the REAL
POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence South 0°26'54" West 29.07 feet to a point of the
southerly right-of-way of Fairview Avenue;
Thence South 22°23'00" West 87.14 feet to a point;
Thence South 0°26'54" West 326.80 feet to a point;
Thence South 84°44'00" West 339.00 feet to a point;
Thence North 87°19'04" West 50.03 feet to a point;
Thence South 0°51'54" West 49.00 feet (formerly
described as South 0°O1" West 49 feet) to a point
Thence South 65°47'54" West 276.30 feet (formerly
described as South 64°57"; West 276.3 feet) to a point;
Thence North 0°26'42" East 126.08 feet to a point;
Thence North 0°35'39" West 224.17 feet to a point;
Thence North 0°24'15" West 283.55 feet to a point on the
North boundary of the NE 1/4 of said Section 7;
Thence South 89°28'06" East 679.64 feet along said North
boundary to THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, comprising 7.47
acres.
AMENDED ANNERATION ORDINANCE - DANBURY FAIR Page 3
•
AND
PARCEL THREE
A parcel of land being a portion of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4
of Section 7, T.3N., R.lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho and more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a point marking the Section corner common
to Sections 5, 6 and 8 and the said Section 7;
Thence North 89°28'06" West 1,320.51 feet along the
Northerly boundary of the said NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of
Section 7 to a point marking the Northwest corner of the
said NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 7, also said point
being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence South 89°28'06" East 65.31 feet (formerly
described as North 89°41' East 53.2 feet) along the said
Northerly boundary of the NE 1/4 of Section 7 to a
point;
Thence South 1°24'54" West 25.00 feet (formerly
described as South 0°34' West 25.0 feet) to a point;
Thence South 49°56'06" East 161.10 feet (formerly
described as South 50°47' East 161.1 feet) to a point;
Thence South 25°01'06" East 133.20 feet (formerly
described as South 25°52' East) to a point;
Thence South 90°00'00" West 246.56 feet to a point on
the Westerly boundary of the said NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4
of Section 7;
Thence North 0°30'58" East (formerly described as North
0°34' East) 250.00 feet along the Westerly boundary of
the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 7 to the point of
beginning,. comprising 0.664 acre (28,937.35 square
feet), more or less,
AND ALSO
A parcel of land being a portion of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4
of Section 7, T. 3N., R.lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho and more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a point marking the Section corner common
to Sections 5, 6 and 8 and the said Section 7;
thence South 0°26'54" West 2,649.57 feet along the
Easterly boundary of the said NE 1/4 of Section 7, which
is also centerline of Locust Grove Road, to a point
marking the one-quarter corner common to the said
Section 7 and 8;
AMENDED ANNERATION ORDINANCE - DANBURY FAIR Page 4
•
thence South 89°33'52" West 1,418.83 feet along the
Southerly boundary of the said NE 1/4 of Section 7,
which is also the centerline of East Pine Avenue, to the
REAL POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence North 0°30'58" East 225.00 feet to a point;
Thence South 89°33'52" West 566.78 feet to a point;
Thence South 0°32'59" West 225.00 feet to a point on the
Southerly boundary of the said NE 1/4 of Section 7 and
centerline of East Pine Avenue;
Thence North 89°33'52" East 566.91 feet along the said
Southerly boundary and centerline of East Pine Avenue to
the point of beginning,
is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian; that PARCEL ONE is be
zoned R-8 Residential; PARCEL TWO is zoned C-G General Commercial
and Service Retail and PARCEL THREE is zoned L-O Limited Office;
that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions
referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as
adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and
zoning.
Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de-
annexation if the owner or his assigns, heirs, or successors shall
not meet the requirements contained in the Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law adopted by the City Council of the City of
Meridian, which are incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
The property shall also be subject to the restrictions of the
Idaho Department of Transportation.
Section 3. That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy
of the legal description and map which shall plainly and clearly
designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the
Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax
Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of
this Amended Ordinance.
AMENDED ANNE7[ATION ORDINANCE - DANBURY FAIR Page 5
•
Section 4. .This Amended Ordinance shall be in full force
and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication as
required by law.
PASSED by the City Council and Approved by the Mayor of the
City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this ~ ~~ day of
September, 1995.
APPROVED:
YOR -- GRANT P. ING F RD
ATTES
W L AM G. B RG, JR. -- TY CLERK
STATE OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada, )
~````~~~unt~i~ai~~~~~f~~''
~`~`` '`mil ~ ~ '~~ii
~~~.a
'~ ~~~~
•~~~~~yd'9 IoST 15z ~~O```~ _
~~~~~, ~1l~dl~ .1'0\\~~.
~~~~irt~rr~ ~ett~~~~~~
I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian,
Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN
AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND LYING
IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 7, T.3N., R.lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, " passed as Amended Ordinance No. 559
by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the
day of September, 1995, as the same appears in my office.
DATED this ~~day of September, 1995.
/~~
City Clerk, City o M idian
Ada County, Idaho
AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - DANBURY FAIR Page 6
STATE OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada, )
On this ~ day of September, 1995, before me, the
undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally
appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he executed the same.
IN WITNESS
my official seal
written.
SEAL
WHEREOF, I have hereunto. set my hand and affixed
the day and year in this certificate first above
,`,,*,~ IIL.~y,~~~~~
a ,r~
~° ~ .'~ ~ ae~ ~~ ~ry~i
.~ t.,~~ Na y. .M.
SOS ~ E? ;~
~* U~~.
4kM ~.. q V,
nn ~
s~~///lllllllll
Public for Idaho
g at Meridian, Idaho
,fission Expires
AA~ENDED ANNExATION ORDINANCE - DANSURY FAIR Page 7
•
,~- ~,,
~~_ ~~
RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC.
9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709
PROJECT NO. 9414900
208/322-8992 ^ Fax 208/378-0329
JULY 10, 1995
REVISED SEPTEMBER 29, 1995
~ECETV~~ REVISED
SEP 2 9 1995 DESCRIPTION FOR
COMMERCIAL ZONE APPLICATION OF
MERMAN CRY EFk~ DANBURY FAIR SUBDIVISION
A PORTION OF THE NE1/4 NE1/4, SECTION 7,
T.3N., R.1 E., B.M.,
ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE NE1/4 OF THE NE1/4 OF SECTION
7, T.3N., R.1E., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT A POINT MARKING THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO
SECTIONS 5, 6 AND 8 AND THE SAID SECTION 7; THENCE NORTH 89°28'06" WEST 347.91
FEET ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE SAID NE1/4 OF SECTION 7 TO THE REAL
POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 0°26'54" WEST 29.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FAIRVIEW AVENUE;
THENCE SOUTH 22°23'00" WEST 87.14 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE SOUTH 0°26'54" WEST 326.80 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE SOUTH 84°44'00" WEST 339.00 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE NORTH 87°19'04" WEST 50.03 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE SOUTH 0°51'54" WEST 49.00 FEET (FORMERLY DESCRIBED AS SOUTH
0°01" WEST 49 FEET) TO A POINT
THENCE SOUTH 65°47'54" WEST 276.30 FEET (FORMERLY DESCRIBED AS SOUTH
64°57; WEST 276.3 FEET) TO A POINT;
THENCE NORTH 0°26'42" EAST 126.08 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE NORTH 0°35'39" WEST 224.17 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE NORTH 0°24'15" WEST 283.55 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH
BOUNDARY OF THE NE1/4 OF SAID SECTION 7;
PAGE 1 OF 2
•
THENCE SOUTH 89°28'06" EAST 679.64 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY TO
THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, COMPRISING 7.47 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
SUBJECT TO:
ALL EASEMENTS AND ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD ON THE ABOVE
DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND.
~D~
~~' ,~'
o N
a ~~
~o'g aF ~vP~
0~ R. `N~
TRW/VW/910. DES
PREPARED BY:
RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC.
TODD R. WAITE, P.L.S.
NOTE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS COMPILED FROM DATA OF RECORD AND
CALCULATED DATA AND NOT FROM AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY BY RUBBLE
ENGINEERING, INC.
PAGE20F2
DAND Y FAIR SUBL~VISION
AMMENDED .ANNEXATION ZONING MAP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
A PORTION OF THE NE 1 /4 OF SECTION 7,
T.3N., R.1 E., B.M.
S 49'56'06" E S 25'01'06' E
161.10' 172.94'
S 01'24'54' W S 89'33'22" E
25.00' 33.83'
S 89'28'06" E` ~ / N 00'24'15" W N 992a'08' w
8 m ceio~ncm e,.r 85-31' \ / 283.55' wo,•
7
NW COR. NE1 /4 NE1 /4
i~ C:%h/I P/I r"f~
w-~ `' W I
p~ I~
O ~'-
Z
S 89'4238" E 1020.34'
$p°I
~~ R-8 Zone
46.45 ACRES
W
1
3
2
W
z
p*, N 89'87'09~W 847
OI
Z
~~
~I
01 ~
o~
n
W'
00
~MbMV I
O+
Z •;~
S 89'33'52' W
568.78'
~'~G.!:L rte; r~i
S 89'33'S2" W 568.9'
8 5
7 8
S 00'26'54" W
29.07'
S 22'23'00" W
3 87.14'
~$
M
~~
y
' 339.00'
~+ 'N N 87'19'04' W
50.03'
5•'~ S 00'51'54' W
49.00'
27'51'06" E
150.00'
~- S 19'52'06" E
114,70'
~ S 31'08'06" E
73.70'
S 47'52'06" E
131.00'
S 42'57'09' E
66.00'
S 29'47'09" E
pW 94.00'
O ~
iV
~ ~
8^
.n~ ~
X
I'~
~~ J
7
3
~~
~g
~y SCALE: 1 " = 300'
S 89'33'52' W
3 95.00'
~~
0
¢, PINE AVE
S 89'33'52"
hl
ai
m
N
C
wi
0
c~
H
N
I
I
3
m
N
O
O
N
I
ORDINANCE NO. 712
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS LOT 7 AND A PORTION OF LOT 8,
VAN HEES SUBDIVISION, AND A PORTION OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2
OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,
BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of
Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of
said City to annex to the said City real property which is
described in Section 1 below:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council
of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho:
Section 1. That the real property described as:
A parcel of land being a Rezone of Lot 7 and a Portion of
Lot 8 Van Hees Subdivision and a portion of the West 1/2
0 ~ 0 '~ ~ I c~ f the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, Section 14,
~ ~ ~ownship 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian,
~~'C~ Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as
+~. _ ,~~ ~follows:
Beginning at an iron pin marking the Northeast corner of
} ~ ~= ~ -% the said Northeast 1 / 4 of Section 14 ;
_ thence along the Easterly boundary of the said Northeast
'95 G(~ I~ ~~. t1i'j . ~' ~~/4 of Section 14 and centerline of South Linder road,
~ U South 00°33'08" West 1491.59 feet to a point, said point
FEE ,~ _ ....:, : ; being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence leaving said Easterly boundary of the said
Northeast 1/4 of Section 14 and centerline of South
Linder road, North 89°13'17" West 25.00 feet to a point,
said point marking the Westerly right-of-way of South
Linder road;
thence leaving said Westerly right-of-way and continuing,
North 89 ° 13' 17" West 639.72 to an iron pin, said iron pin
marking the Westerly boundary of Van Hees Subdivision as
filed for record in the office of the Ada County
Recorder, Boise, Idaho, in Book 19 of Plats at Page 1222;
thence along said Westerly boundary, South 00°33'43" West
1165.62 feet to an iron pin, said iron pin marking the
Southwest corner of Van Hees Subdivision;
thence leaving the said boundary of Van Hees Subdivision
and continuing South 00°33'43" West 25.00 feet to a
ANNEBATION ORDINANCE - WHITESTONE Page 1
point, said point marking the centerline of West Waltman
Street;
thence along said centerline of West Waltman Street,
North 89°12'13" West 664.92 to a point;
thence leaving said centerline of West Waltman Street and
along the Westerly boundary of the said East 1/2 of the
East 1/2, Section 14, North 00°34'18" East 1861.12 feet
to a point, said point marking the centerline of Ten Mile
Drain;
thence leaving said Westerly boundary of the said East
1/2 of East 1/2 of Section 14, and along the centerline
of Ten Mile Drain, North 75°07'43" East 1304.38 feet to
a point;
thence continuing along the said centerline of Ten Mile
Drain, South 88°37'52" East 71.81 feet to a point, said
point marking the centerline of South Linder Road and
Easterly boundary of the said Northeast 1/4 of Section
14;
thence leaving said centerline of Ten Mile Drain and
along the Easterly boundary of the said Northeast 1/4 of
Section 14 and centerline of South Linder road, South
00°33'08" West 1021.83 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Comprising 44.29 acres more or less.
is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and is zoned R-4
Residential; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the
conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for
annexation and zoning; that all ditches, canals and waterways shall
be tiled, including those that are property boundaries or only
partially located on the property.
Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de-
annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements:
a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to
Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and
sewer mains will serve the land.
b. That the development of the property shall be subject to
and controlled by the Subdivision and Development
Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted
January 4, 1994.
ANNEBATION ORDINANCE - W$ITE3TONE Page 2
c. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall
be required to enter into a development agreement as
authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the
development agreement shall address inclusion into the
subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G, H 2, K,
L and M of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the
City of Meridian and other matters.
d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply
with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in
particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to
development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9-605
M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways.
e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind
the Applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns.
f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of
the City of Meridian.
Section 3. That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of
the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly
designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada
County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission
within ten (10) days following the effective date of this
Ordinance.
Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency,
which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall
be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval
as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the
~-
City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this g ~ day of
September, 1995.
ANNE%ATION ORDINANCE - WHITESTONE Page 3
•
APPROVED:
MAYOR -- GRANT
ATTES :_ '
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - TY CLERK
STATE OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada, )
_,~
S`
t ~
- .~.:a..~.a =
,~~
'~~r~C'J~ "rye.,,,~4aylY:l,/e~'~,~`~'''\\\~~
J!lIPPIJiPI P1111+~~~\
I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian,
Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS LOT 7 AND A PORTION OF LOT 8, VAN
HEES SUBDIVISION, AND A PORTION OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF
THE NORTHEAST 1/4, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,
BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE", passed as Ordinance No. 712 b tie City Council and Mayor of
the City of Meridian, on the ..... day of September, 1995,
as the same appears in my office.
DATED this ~' day of September, 1995.
\\\~~~~rurnntrdr!lf~~
~O~ Fo
-J ~ `~~~
'~• '9 0, '~~~ •~`
!!!ld1P{{{{ tLiS1a~~
~ti~ ~ ~ ~
City Clerk, City o Me dian
Ada County, Idaho
ANNEBATION ORDINANCE - WHITESTONE Page 4
STATE OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada, )
On this i (~"~ day of September, 1995, before me, the
undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally
appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my
official seal the day and year in this certificate first above
written. /
,`,,~1C 11i 1/11~'R~~I
SEAL ;.~~.~ ®''14:.~"e~5+`','.
* ~, c, 3$
~H`\
a y Public for Ida
'ding at Meridian,
Commission Expires
Idah
O .z.
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - WHITESTONE Page 5
~~
ORDINANCE NO. 715 ~ r. _ _-_ ~ ;
~~'
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING ANI~ Z ,~~~., C ~~
REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LA~~~I~1~ ~--0~'~-~
LOT 2, BLOCK 1 OF TIMOTHY SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN BOOK 31 OF
PLATS AT PAGE 1923 OF ADA COUNTY RECORDS, AND ALSO ~HE°-RIGHT Of'-WAY ;„ -~
OF TEARE AVENUE FROM THE CENTERLINE OF OVERLAl~~~''~f}AD`' TO ' Tfi5~ '
TERMINUS WITH SAID LOT 2, AND ALSO THE SOUTH 1/2 OF INTERSTATE 84
LYING ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 2, ALL BEING IN THE S 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4
OF SECTION 18, T.3N., R.lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of
Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of
said City to annex to the said City real property which is
described in Section 1 below:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City
Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho:
Section 1. That the real property described as:
A parcel of land being all of Lot 2, Block 1 of Timothy
Subdivision as recorded in Book 31 of Plats at page 1923
of Ada County records, and also the right-of-way of Teare
Ave. from the centerline of Overland Road to its terminus
with said Lot 2, and also that portion of Interstate 84
lying adjacent to said Lot 2, all being in the S 1/2 of
the SE 1/4 of Section 18, T.3N., R.1E., B.M., Ada County,
Idaho; being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Lot 2 thence
North 0°28'51" East along the West line of said Lot 2 for
a distance of 327.76 feet to the South right-of-way line
of I-84;
Thence North 0°25'48" East for a distance of 200.00 feet
to the North right-of-way line of I-84;
Thence South 89°34'12" East along said North right-of-way
line for a distance of 373.87 feet;
Thence South 0°25'48" West for a distance of 200.00 feet
to the South right-of-way line of I-84 also being the
Northeast corner of said Lot 2;
Thence South 38°20'21" East along the Easterly line of
said Lot 2 for a distance of 467.46 feet;
ANNEBATION ORDINANCE - TREASURE VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH Page 1.
Thence South 51°26'32" West for a distance of 21.83 feet;
Thence South 89°44' 18" West for a distance of 590.00 feet
to the East right-of-way line of Teare Ave;
Thence South 0°28'51" West along said right-of-way line
for a distance of 700.00 feet to the centerline of
Overland Road;
Thence South 89°44'18" West along said centerline for a
distance of 50.00 feet;
Thence leaving said centerline North 0°28'51" East for a
distance of 758.29 feet to the Point of Beginning,
contains 7.30 acres, more or less.
is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned L-O
Limited Office; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the
conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for
annexation and zoning.
Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de-
annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements:
a. That the Applicant for this annexation shall be required
to connect to Meridian water and sewer at its expense and
resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the
land.
b. That the development of the property shall be subject to
and controlled by the Subdivision and Development
Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted
January 4, 1994.
c. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall
be required to enter into a development agreement as
authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the
development agreement shall address inclusion into the
subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2,
K, and L of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the
City of Meridian and other matters; that the property may
be de-annexed if the terms and conditions of the
Development Agreement are not satisfied.
d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply
with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in
particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to
development time schedules and requirements, 11-9-605 M.
which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways.
ANNE%ATION ORDINANCE - TREASURE VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH Page 2
• •
e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind
the Applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns.
f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of
the City of Meridian.
Section 3 . That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of
the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly
designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada
County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission
within ten (10) days following the effective date of this
Ordinance.
Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency,
which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall
be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval
as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council and approved b the Mayor of the
City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this ~ ~~,day of September,
1995.
APPROVED:
F
MAYOR -- GRANT P. KIN S ORD
ATTEST : \\\``\~ti~r.e r n u ---~,,,~~~/
~~ ~ ~~'~ j Y ~" ~~~
~~ ~
\~ ~~
r
WILLIAM G. BERG, J -- CITY CLERK = ~~
/~jf~f~1~~P~~ 11tt\\\~~\
ANNERATION ORDINANCE - TRSASURR VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH Page 3
•
STATE OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada, )
I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian,
Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND BEING ALL OF LOT 2,
BLOCK 1 OF TIMOTHY SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN BOOK 31 OF PLATS AT
PAGE 1923 OF ADA COUNTY RECORDS, AND ALSO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF TEARE
AVENUE FROM THE CENTERLINE OF OVERLAND ROAD TO ITS TERMINUS WITH
SAID LOT 2, AND ALSO THE SOUTH 1/2 OF INTERSTATE 84 LYING ADJACENT
TO SAID LOT 2, ALL BEING IN THE S 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 18,
T.3N., R.lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE."; passed as Ordinance No. 715 , b ~he City Council and
Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the ~ day of September,
1995, as the same appears in my office.
~~~,,,rurrrrrlrrii
~,co~~ ~ f~is 1~ day of September, .1995.
_ -~~~ -
'' °~' City Clerk, City f eridian
' ~,i g
%,~'s'~9 ~T 1~~c • ~` P.jo\~~w` Ada County, Idaho
~~''~~, ~dtlWTY , ~~.~~\.
/~11111U li r1141~~~\\
STATE OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada, )
On this ~~~ day of September, 1995, before me, the
undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally
appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my
official seal the day and year in this certificate first above
written.
r!`yE~rrr nrr,r~or
a~1 ~; ~ L ' Cj ~i
~ •o
•
SEAL ; •`'.a ®'°~ ~iS'
..~
gip(' S ~,~G ~ ~:
,~~ ~'p
a y Public for Idaho
'ding at Meridian, Idah
Commission Expires ~ ~
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - TREASURE VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH Page 4
m
i
i
w ~
i
r' i
Z
M
H
W pp
a r-
~ 3
~ Z
~ ~
= F
~ ~
U ~
~ \
m W
Q N
m w
w
J ~'
QO
> ~.
w~
~~W
~~
~~`'s
~_
0
z
O
F
^O
I..L
Q
S32i~V ZL'L ~ldM ~0 1HJIa Sf 8 ~g ~1.d1Sa31Nl
N
v
o ~~ s
~' Q J
~~ ~
a
N
W
a
.:
N
JL
~~
s
W
I~
V\ IA
N
~O
- ~ - -
~1n
y1
a
s avow aNV~a3no _ ~~_ _
9~0?`fl"~
r ~ ~ ~-
1 i ~-+ Iii
„. ~ :L -: t. :~r
ORDINANCE NO . 714 ~ U ~
REAL PROPERTY WH CHE ISIDESCRIBED AS lA PARCELIOF LAN~~~'1SUA~I'EC~~ ~ ~~
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC~~aN 17, AND IN
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER ~' . ==SECTION ~, ~~ ~` _~
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, AD~CCUNTY; TD1~iH0,-'J '~'
BEING ALL OF LOT 11 OF THE AMENDED MAGIC VIEW SUBDIVISION, AS SHOWN
ON THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE ADA
COUNTY RECORDER, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAYS; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of
Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of
said City to annex to the said City real property which is
described in Section 1 below:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City
Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho:
Section 1. That the real property described as:
A parcel of land situate in the Southeast quarter of the
Northeast quarter of Section 17, and in the Southwest
quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 16, Township
3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho,
being all of Lot 11 of the Amended Magic View
Subdivision, as shown on the official plat thereof on
file in the office of the Ada County Recorder, and
adjoining right-of-ways being more particularly described
as follows:
Commencing at the East quarter corner of said Section 17;
thence N 00°22'58" W, 151.05 feet along the Easterly
boundary of said Section 17 to the Real Point of
Beginning:
Thence continuing N 00°22'58" W, 262.67 feet along the
Easterly boundary of said Section 17 to the Southerly
boundary extended of said Lot 11;
Thence S 89°37'02" W, 709.05 feet along the Southerly
boundary extended and the Southerly boundary of said Lot
11 to the centerline of Allen Street;
Thence N 00°22'58" W, 336.35 feet along the centerline of
Allen Street to the centerline of Magic View Drive;
ANNERATION ORDINANCE - JACRSONS FOOD STORES Page 1
Thence N 89°37'02" E, 709.05 feet along the centerline of
Magic View Drive to the Easterly boundary of said Section
17;
Thence N 00°22'58" W, 571.28 feet along the Easterly
boundary of said Section 17 to the Southerly boundary
extended of Montvue Park Subdivision, as shown on the
official plat thereof on file in the office of the Ada
County Recorder;
Thence S 89°27'31" E, 69.59 feet to the intersection of
the South line of said Montvue Park Subdivision and the
Easterly right-of-way of Eagle Road;
Thence 342.87 feet along the Easterly right-of-way of
Eagle Road along a curve deflecting to the right with a
radius of 5,799.58 feet, a central angle of 03°23'14", a
long chord of 342.82 feet and a long chord bearing of S
O1°58'27" W to a point of reverse curvature;
Thence 432.63 feet along the Easterly right-of-way of
Eagle Road along a curve deflecting to the left with a
radius of 5,659.58 feet, a central angle of 04°22'47", a
long chord of 432.52 feet and a long chord bearing of S
O1°28'41" W;
Thence N 89°17'30" E, 5.00 feet along the Easterly right-
of-way of Eagle Road;
thence S 00°42'42" E, 394.41 feet along the Easterly
right-of-way of Eagle Road;
Thence S 89°37'02" W, 48.69 feet to the Real Point of
Beginning. Comprising 6.865 acres, more or less.
is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned C-G
General Retail and Service Commercial; that the annexation and
zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on
the request for annexation and zoning; that all ditches, canals and
waterways shall be tiled, including those that are property
boundaries or only partially located on tlhe property.
Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de-
annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements:
ANNERATION ORDINANCE - JACRSONS FOOD STORIES Page 2
a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to
Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and
sewer mains will serve the land.
b. That the development of the property shall be subject to
and controlled by the Subdivision and Development
Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted
January 4, 1994.
c. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall
be required to enter into a development agreement as
authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the
development agreement shall address inclusion into the
subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G 1., H,
K, L and M of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the
City of Meridian and other mattex-s; that the property may
be de-annexed if the terms and conditions of the
Development Agreement are not satisfied.
d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply
with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in
particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to
development time schedules and requirements, 11-9-605 M.
which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways,
and 11-9-606 B 14. which pertains to pressurized
irrigation.
e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind
the Applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns.
f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of
the City of Meridian.
Section 3 . That the City Clerk shall cause one ( 1) copy of
the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly
designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada
County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission
within ten (10) days following the effective date of this
Ordinance.
Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency,
which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall
be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval
as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council and approved ~jy the Mayor of the
City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this ~ day of September,
1995.
APPROVED:
ANNE7CATION ORDINANCE - JACRSONS FOOD STORES Page 3
•
ATTEST:
MAYOR -- GRANT P. KIN~~~~'QRD
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. C Y CLERK
STATE OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada, )
~i CFO
e~~~~a
9 ~ ~~,~
~`
'~n,,r» s r i~~~+~r~
I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian,
Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATE IN THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, AND IN
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16,
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO,
BEING ALL OF LOT 11 OF THE AMENDED MAGIC VIEW SUBDIVISION, AS SHOWN
ON THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE ADA
COUNTY RECORDER, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAYS; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE."; passed as Ordinance No. 714 , lax he City
Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the ~~ day of
September, 1995, as the same appears in my office.
DATED this ~~ day of September, 1995.
\\\~~~~ti-un~~Ur,,,ii
~ '`Y'
\~O TFO ~,
'~, ,Q ~~• ~.,
~~~~~~rrre; ~t ntt~~~'~~
City Clerk, City o M ridian
Ada County, Idaho
ANNE7CATION ORDINANCE - JACRSONS FOOD STORES Page 4
STATE OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada, )
•
On this I~'." day of -1995, before me, the
undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally
appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my
official seal the day and year in this certificate first above
written.
,~~~~errs~r~,,,~•~
SEAL ~•``~~,,'~ L . ~,, •,,,
~ ~ as ~ ~~~~~® ~~ ~ ~~
'~~ f~
g O"i ~ f~
~ ~ ~~
* ~ (~ \~
~ $1. o
~"
~~~~ai~~i~~~~~~,
a y Public for Ida
'ding at Meridian,
Commission Expires
Idaho
D
ANNERATION ORDINANCE - JACRSONS FOOD STORES Page 5
ORDINANCE NO. ~`
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN REPEALING TITLE
7, CHAPTER 6, SECTION 612, OF THE REVISED AND COMPILED
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; RE-ENACTING TITLE 7,
CHAPTER 6, SECTION 612, OF THE REVISED AND COMPILED
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Mayor and the City Council of the City
of Meridian, State of Idaho, have concluded that it is in
the best interest of the said City to repeal Section 612,
EFFECTIVE DATES, of Title 7, Chapter 6, of the Revised
and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and re-
enacting said Chapter to provide new effective dates.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO:
SECTION 1: That Section 612, EFFECTIVE DATES, of
Chapter 6, Title 7, of the Revised and Compiled
Ordinances of the City of Meridian is hereby repealed.
SECTION 2: That Section 612, EFFECTIVE DATES, of
Chapter 6, Title 7 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances
of the City of Meridian is hereby re-enacted and shall
read as follows:
7-612 EFFECTIVE DATES: This Chapter shall be
effective beginning on January 1, 1991. It shall be
rendered null-and void on December 31, 1996, but may be
extended thereafter at the discretion of participants in
the joint powers agreement.
AIR QUALITY ORDINANCE Page 1
•
SECTION 3: EFFECTIVE DATE: WHEREAS, there is an
emergency therefor, which emergency is hereby declared to
exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force. and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication
according to law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this ~ day of September,
1995.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
GRANT P. KINGS R -
ATTES //: ``,~~~~uuuruhrr
WILLIAM G. BERG, J - ITY CLERK ~~ FO '%
e~~~a
~' ~~~ ~
/~' ' o~" \\~~
'~~%, caU~TY , ` ~,,~.
~~rrrrrnn rrin~~~~~
AIR QUALITY ORDINANCE, Page 2