Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTime Extension - Administrative.X-~.~ ~,r~~~;y~ - Nth i~aia~.=tr.-.~~ _. !'r;~R ._ .. .r;V~ ~~ .- .. s c. ~. ~.'~~!~~; J ;^~•" sxvryr"urr•r-. - ~ •Gw-k~~r ~- -.~~sx^. `C.E{~f :. E IDIAN.- z .. ~~ April 10, 2008 j: - Bob Unger . Red Cliff Development 2060 S. Eagle Rd. ~_ Meridian, ID 83642 ,. MayorTammy de Weerd City Council Members: Keith Bird . Joe Borton~~~ Charles Rountree ,. David Zaremba x x , ,,. - w U, °' ~.J.'. C> ~ l ~, ... r RE: 'Dime Extension for Bienville Square Subdivision Dear Mr. Unger: P.er the fmdings of the attached staff report for Bienville Square Subdivision, I am granting approval of a 6-month time extension as requested. You have until November 2, 2008 to obtain the city engineer's signature on this Final Plat. ~, Please note that UDC 11-SB-6F4 and UDC 11-6B-7 allows the director to require, as part of a time extension approval, compliance with the provisions of the UDC; there is one additional condition of approval for this project that is being iequirec~as part ~bf the subject time extension approval. ~~ Please see the attached staff report for details on the additional condition of approval;for the subject development. J r. • In accordance with UDC 11-SA-3F and UDCxI l-SA-6, you have the option fo appeal this decision to the 7; City Council. All Cily Council Reviews (appeals) shall be filed in writing with.the Planning Department within fifteen (15) days after the date of this letter. The appeal will be forwarded ta'~the City Council to conduct a public hearing. The applicati6n should specify the grounds upon which the appeal is filed.r: If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please don't hesitate tip call Sarah Wheeler at 884- 5533. =:Y ;i Si~ereky„ `" ~~ ,~ / r y,' Anna orchers ping, AICP lanning Director by' F' ' .. ~. T' CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Un' fF 'J. DATE: Apri14, 2008 TO: Anna Canning, Planning Director E II~~AN~-- ~~ _ 11~AH0 FROM: Sarah Wheeler, Assistant City Planner ~~ (208) 884-5533 ~' ''' ^~ ~.~z <: ~ _ ~ .. +:SUBJECT: Bienville Square Time Extension Request fora 6-month Time Extension to Obtain City Engineer's Signature on the Final,~Pla~ for ' r~ ~Bienvilld` Square Subdivision Consisting of 52 Single-F'atlmily Resid~itial Building Lots, 1 ~~ , « "~; Multi-Family Lot, 6 Commercial Lol's, and 7 common Lots on 27.36 Acres in R-8, R-15 and C- r r ~ G zones by Red Cliff Development, Inc. (File # TE-08-00~ :<'' „ ,: ~, ,j, s r. ~_~ Staff has reviewed this submittal and offers the following comments: ~ ~ ~~ ;~+~; APPLICATION SUNIlVIARY :~ .. ~. .: The applicant, Red Cliff Development, Inc., has requested approval of a time extension to obtain the City Engineer's-'signature on the fmal plat for Bienville Square Subdivision. The subject final plat consists of 52 single-family residential building lots, lmulti-family lot, 6 commercial lots and 7 common lots on 27.36 acres in R-8, R-15 and C-G zoning districts. The Applicant has been unable to meet the time requirements specified in Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-7 and 11-SB-6. According to the Applicant the delay resulted due to off-site construction approval from Land Baron and the Alleman Water User's Association. The project is currently under construction and co~letion date is set for July 1, 2008 (see Applicant's letter dated April 1, 2008). .. The annexation (AZ-OS-057), rezone (RZ-OS-019), preliminary plat (PP-OS-059) and conditional use permit (CUP-OS-052) for Bienville Square Subdivision were approved by the Meridian City Council on May 2, 2006. The final plat for Bienville Square Subdivision (FP-07-012) was approved by City council on June 5, 2007. Per the conditions of approval, Bienville Square Subdivision would otherwise expire on May 2, 2008." The City of Meridian's Unified Development Code (LTDC 11-6B-7) allows the Director to authorize one ~E administrative time extension to record the final plat, not to exceed 18-months, when the applicant files a written request for an extension prior to the expiration of the plat. The Applicant has met the necessary deadline by filing a written request fora 6-month time extension before the final plat expired. Additional time extensions up „~ zo to 18-months may be granted if determined and approved by the City Council. ~;, With all dktensions, the City may require compliance with the current provisions of the UDC as a condition for granting a time extension (IJDC 11-6B-7C). Staff believes that there are additional conditions that should be added to those approved by the City Council for this subdivision. Specifically, staff is recommending full compliance with the landscape, lighting and pathway standards of the Eagle Road Corridor Study (See Site Specific Conditions below). Staff recommends approval of Bienville Square Subdivision with the comments and conditions stated in this report. .~ LOCATION Bienville Square Subdivision is located at 2935 N. Eagle Road, on the west side of Eagle Road and south of Ustick Road in the NE'/4 of Section 5, 3N., R. lE. ~, f~~ ,~ = TE-08-Od7 Bienville Square Subdivision Time Extensior~doc PAGE 1 M1 7 M ~ n sx CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT ~ SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. The applicant is to meet all terms of the approved annexation (AZ-OS-057), development ag}eement (instrument # 107044347), preliminary plat (PP-OS-059), conditional use permit (CUP-OS-052), and final plat ''x (FP-07-012) for this development. 2. The applicant shall construct a .~ 0-foot wide sidewalk (with a public use easement for any portion of the pathway located~utside of the right-of--way where applicable), and install pedestrian level street lights and landscaping along Eagle Road. Said pathway, pedestrian street lights, and landscaping shall be consistent with the Eagle Road Corridor Study. .. ~, ~, 3. The applicant shall have an additional 6 months, until November 2, 2008, to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat, satisfy the applicable requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and begin the process of acquiring building permits and commencing construction of permanent footings or structures. ~: STAFF RECOMII~NDATION ~, ` Staff recommends approval of a 6-month time extension to obtain the engineer's signature on the final plat for Bienville Square Subdivision, to expire on November 2, 2008. J Y~ i 1 =~ ~:~; ^ 7: f II U n x' .V TE-08-007 Bienville Square Subdivision Time Extension.doc~ ~ _ „i-~! Sit. .~ .. ^. 7.S IE .~ as a ~ . rnx ;~x Ir, PAGE 2 ., E ~ r 1'. r ~ ~. -~~. ~..~ d ~ :f ,~ _ ~4 • ~ I (6 C .~ C~ .. ~ R I V" T i i ~ ' m ~ . . 3 ~~.' ~~ `,~ ?!f .~ C3} .~ . .L'^' N :C .~ rC .rN., ~' r n ..C .~ ..C (~ ~.. C .~ O ~ -~ ~e~- •~ I ~5" 1 a: 1 I hi 5-~ ~, :~ _. r ~ z ~--~-----~-(t~1'-6 1I2" • CP12F4118=C,~IBK CP12F5~18-CAIBK CP'14F5118-CA~BK :~'^ a Utiiitjr•Arlington Utility Arling#on .Utility Arlington ~; - ~s Tii~PRIV""[[~~~i6 PRC~Zl1f Of ~ ~` HdIO?FL$IEAHI9IS Lpp~' StlJ°CTTO LY]10/O`~xViOfjaY_ LPON O~JI(A1p .{~Np UTAOA p(ppE53 Ca TpRTFYSIT~~p.LgUTB~U3m • .n CiI.Y 0[i 1NORilCil11,~7/1N1i WAY •H~LaPHAHE 9 . n atru.TO INiFFE.~,/J~ v ogcclNNecn~lj~yYtNUrtt=W,~, LEADER INIIGHTI;IGSOLUTIONS • ~uRN ~1EDaY CIORFUI~ ~ An ~-IcuhyBrandsCompany • _ City of Meridian - ,~ ,.... ~ ~+'~ ~ ~ "' DRW: ~-IH Dt~-: 1 X27-:r4 PAGE': -' 1 RED ~, ~ _ s~ _ ~k i. ~~ eta uti a sa€ ~~ Z~ w~ ~ ~ ~ add rt ~. GCiI 3e~".t9~ 'Y3.~6i~=~res±k=vx >xx ~s: t~ _:~ ~ MlniMUM . = 0.2 V~ ~~ ti 3 Avg/Min Ratlo 6.35 Slid Max/Min Ratlo = 1 50 ~ ~- ~i •? 9 L'S rat ~, ., c ^~ ., ~ as u ^ ~ s: ~~ ~S , .. ^ Ati ~ ~d .. :~, M ~ ,K SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS z 3 5, t ->,..n ~. ,.. a t ~ a. ~-rr x Alf K n 1 ' t't~tf'~f3$t3i~e cE~9z~~6 `t' *a7.. 1 ~ (deleted). ~~ 6. ...transportation authority (Wade Christiansen or his sucdtssor at TTD), and construct a 35-foot wide landsca~ ^ buffer along Eagle Road ... . it 7. The applicant shall construct a ~ 10-foot wide ~ sidewalk (with a public use ea~ment for ~` any portion of the pathway Iacated outside of the right-of- way whare applicablEl at the edge of the right hand lane and install street lights and landscaping along Eagle Road that is consistent with the Eagle Road Corridor Study. 11. C~at~iwe3ly ~~- ~ ~ **• r r .t. t . t.t• r Y Y .suv-~.~ (deleted). 12. Graphically depict on ~e face of the plat a 35-foot wide landscape buffer (unless otherwise approved by Council through a variance application)~~nent along Eagle Road, whore applicable. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall ..~ be signed only at such. time as: 1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements aze compldted and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. .,~ ., NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION ORDER OF CONDTTIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR GARDNER - AHLQUIST SUBDIVISION,1`TO. lu/ (FP-07-027) Pam 3 of 5 ' .. r ,~ ., ~~ I ~ ~l.1• ~ r :~. Page 1 of 3 ~l 3i e ._ a~ Sarah Wheeler ~~ From: ~. Caleb Hood ~~~t °~p~•~~ ~~~~ ~~~,~- ,~, Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 10:40 AIVr To: Sarah Wheeler (~ ~~~~ ~~._t~_IJ~~~•~ ' Cc• Anna Canning ~- h'S~'<< ~rrre~ u~ ~~ «5~+~ ~~~ Subject: RE: SPAM-LOW: Eagle Road Lighting ~~~"~ ' Sarah, I know it is in the code that concurrent CUP and Plat applications expire within )•8 months. However, neither the findings nor the staff report even mention to the applicant that this is the case. In fact, the Windings that Joe G. did actually state that there is a 2 year time limit. Because Joe did not provide accurate information (surprise, surprise), I think we go ahead and give them they TE for both the PP and CUP. This was a BAD report and Findings that we put out. Hopefully, this is one of the last Joe G. projects hanging out there. Caleb Froni~'Sarah Wheeler gent: Monday, April 07, 2008 10:00 AM ^ ~ • X1'0: C. Caleb Hood ~~ Subject: RE: SPAM-LOW: Eagle Road Lighting = ~• x I actually had a question on the Bienville TE. Their pp expires in May. However, they did have a CUP and that would have expired a while ago. I read through all the communication that they received from us and everything said they had two years from the approval of the prelimina~~y plat to get the final plat signed. From what I can find we never mentioned the18 month expiration for the CUP. I talked to the building department and they cannot find any record of them pulling a building permit or starting any kind of construction. I will look into the lighting and sidewalk issue but I need some guidance on what to do with the TE. Thanks. Sarah ;~ Sarah Wheeler a Assistant City Planner wheelers(a)meridiancity.org ,. From: C. Caleb Hood Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:50 AM To: Anna Canning ~; Cc: Sarah Wheeler Subject: RE: SPAM-LOW: Eagle Road^L~ghting k If the Meridjan;Gateway.(or is it Gateway Meridian) on the SEC of Ustick and Eagle has the~condition, then the Sa _ e ree aria Bienville projects may also. They were all approved ar`ou~id the same time. ~~ Bienville is in for a TE now; Sarah is working on thatrequest. Sarah -Please check the Bienville conditions.for some language about installing pathways and lighting along Eagle Road that is consistent with the Eagle Road Corridor Plan. If there is no such condition :. ~., ~.4/7/2008~ ,,= ~: - ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ _. -~ .. Page 2 of 3 let's add it to our TE approval. I can help you with this if need be. Caleb From: Anna Canning ^ gent: Friday, April 04, 2008 9:14 AM To: C. Caleb Hosed Subject: RE: SPAM-LOW: Eagle Road Lighting ~Caleb, We should check the SE corner. I think they do have the same requirement for pathway and lighting. Nivaybe they just don't know it yet. Anna ~,. City of Meridian Planning Department (208) 884-5533 phone (2Q6) 886-6854 facsimile !13 * a. ~_ ~~ ~ ^ ^ .S-Tll~C~ '_r,9S-A'I. '~^' !1•arw-7C-}!-39': -r-~ From: C. Caleb Hood Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 9:04 AM ro: Thomas Ahlquist ^ Cc: Anna Canning ~ ~ ^ ~' Subject: RE: SPAM-LOW: Eaglr Road Lighting } "Tommy, a Unfortunately, the projects at Eagle and Ustick were approved prior to the City adopting~the lighting and pathway standards that your development is being held to. Your~roject has some pretty specific requirements for lighting and pathway standards. Your right, it is not very likely that we will have a consistent look along the entire length of Eagle Road anytime soon (unless the state suddenly runs into a bunch of'money or we get a bunch of redevelopment). However, we do want to start this look and your project will set that standard for what the City will be requiring as we do see redevelopment along Eagle. Again, we have adopted these lighting and pathway standards and any development we do see along Eagle will also be held to that standard. For example, the Meridian Towry Center project at Eagle and Fairview has the same lighting and pathway requirement. With your project and theirs, wi' can begin to establish this look. I am at a conference for the day, but I wig check my a-mail regularly if you want to discuss more; I will be back in the ofFce on Monday. From: Thomas Ahlquist [mailto:tahlquistl@mac.com] ~I ~-~- ~ I~ ~ ~Vi Sent: Thu 4/3/2008 4:34 PM To: £. Caleb Hood Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: Eaglr Road Lighting ~ ~ ~~ Caleb, Thanks for the email. Here is the question. ESI is doing our project and the one on the SE corner of Ustick and Eagle. We were ready to approve the order for our lighting - a big number at $179,000. They asked why we were doing the decorative lights at such a premium. We told them it was part of the Eagle road requirements. Their response, no one else is doing what you are, remember they are the contractor down the~treet. WH Moore also has no such lighting across the street. Neither development has the 10 foot sidewalk which has been very costly and problematic. ~x .~ Our understanding has always been that everyone doing new construction on Eagle road will be required to meet the same Eagle Road corridor study requirements. If not, why are we~required to do ~~ .~ ~ 4/2008 ~~ Page 3 of 3 something that will never have a unified look and was the a}~parent reason for the requirement in the first place. The cost difference is roughly $90,000 so this is not a small issue. Anyway, if you could please clarify your requirements it would be greatly appreciated. As always we appreciate working with you and understand that these issues get very complicated sometimes. We want to do what is best for the City of Meridian, but we also need to be very~cost conscious especially when the desired purpose for the increased cost may not be standard and required by everyone along Eagle Road. If other developments are not required to meet the same standard, we would like to submit for your approval lighting that will meet the photometric requirements at a substantial savings. r~, ~ !~ Thanks again Caleb. I look forward to your take on this issue Tommy J. Thomas Ah/quist Gardner Ahlquist Development 13901 W. Wainright, Suite B Boise, ID 83713 Office: 208-246-8909 Mobile: 208-841-2863 tommva ahl ' tdevelo ment.com www.gardnoraFi quist.com vvww. oorticom~idian.com On Apr 3, 2008, at 3:59 PM, C. Caleb Hood wrote: ~:F?: <image001.jpg> s Tommy, =' ~„ Jenny said you called earlier this afternoon and that your cell wasn't workin~q well so a-mail was the best form of communication. I understand from Jenny that you had some concerns and questions about the Eagle Road pedestrian lighting, but I thought we had that all squared away? Please e- mail me when you get a chance and let me know what your specific concerns/questions are. Thanks. C. Caleb Hood Current Planning Manager City of Nreridian Planning Department 660 E. Watertower Street, Ste. 202 =M.bridian, ID 83642 208.884.5533 208.888.6854 (fax) Vision without action is a daydream. Action without vision is a nig~tmare. w <:~ x 4/7/2008 .:~ u S '~ Bj'!G>~I~-y! ~ Planning Derartment TIME EXTENSION ^ Application Checklist 1• P ~~ K - ti~ Pro'ect name: l Al Ye rL FF A licaritla ent: s Y APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESSALL ITEMS ON THE CHECKLIST ARE SUBMITTED. *FIRST TIME EXTENSIONREQUESTS ONLYREQUIREADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW *SECOND & SUBSEQUENT TIME EXTENSION REQUESTS REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE BODYTHATAPPROYED THE ORIGINAL REQUEST ~_ PP -a5~-ds ~ ~_`~~` 512/~a ~2 -v~-vh".~ 1/~~ -D~,-oI`b WPr nor v5~ . i~a~- i.4 ~ ~, ~ . ti 660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 202 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone (208) 884-5533 Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.orE (Rev.9/21/06) ~ ' r. ~ .~ S All applications are required to contain one copy of the following: ~; x 'J ~r~~r~rn ~ IE)hl1~S a 's T V ~ JP~i ~E~EI,. • ~-RR 0 3 2"~ a City of 1~leridian Planning Department Y Type of Review R~qubted (check wll that apply) x ^ Accessory Use Applicant Information Planning Department ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLIL~ATION Applicant name: ~ ~~ ~R ~~ ~ . !~ . ~ Phone: ~ Applicant address: ~121~+0 5 ~r4 ¢ ~ ~ ~ A ... ~ R /~.~A~~ Zip: g 5S G ~.~ Applicant's interest in property: {$~ Own ^ Rent ^ Optioned ^ Other i .M . Owner name: A7/'f i/a/V ~l2 ~ ~K ~. L . Gy ~. Phone: /f '} .?- }~~Q y . Owner address: ~ b jrj~ s • ~ ~F,~ ~ ~ tZ d. , /~/~ ~ j,R/„~,~ n/ Zip: E~ ~ L y 2 ' ~, Agent name (e.g., architect, engineer, developer, representative): ~~~_u~) (~•~+Z Firm name: '~P~ 6- ~. / FF 7j tv i' [ ~ P,~/ E ~ T Phone: ~' 7~ ~? • ~ .? / Q Address: ~f3"~iJ S . Cp G L s ~7~~- ii A/i! n!' ~ Zip: ;1S3 +'/ ~ Primary contact is: Applicant ^ Owner ^ Agent ^ Other Contact name: ~o ~ ~~~~.t ~ r a• Phone: ~'?~ :t "r'i~~ E-mail: T3 /~ /l1 dr ~ J2 ~ ~~ DC' ~ I ~'F D Yi !/, G'~ y,w Fax: ~15~- Oy,$ y~' Subject Property Information Location/street address: ;~~~~ . E i4 (,, L ~~ J~~~! ~ / ~' W M / 7~ ~.~'~~l ~ Assessor's parcel number(s): S) ~ ~S ~ ~ U 3 S l~ ~ -S I ! Q 5 / l ~ ~ ~ ~ Township, range, section: 3l~ /~_,~it f • S Total acreage: ~ ~ . 3 Current land use: (~~(,u71;~ 7¢ ~~U i k ~ P /Iti ~~ N T Current zoning district: ~~ 8 , ?2-/S', ~'' ~' ~--~ .. 660 E. Watertown Lane, Suite 202 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org 1 (Rev. 9/21/06) V Project Description Project/subdivision name: - /E N yi 1 L ~ ~ f?u~, f _~eSDi y.'~i ~,~ General description of proposed projecUreques~: ~/l,I ~ ~E b 1LS1r, pqus'itS a± T ~~ 5. F. ~ aTS/ 7l ~ =A,cc~4r• ~w,H . 1. o YET/y ~~,~cti~,d ~,vri, ~ ~~it.K ER ~~.~ ~;, ~~r s Proposed zoning district(s):~~,L f R Acres of each zone proposed: :a: Type of use proposed (check all that apply): ~I Residential ~ Commercial ®Office ^ Industrial ^ Outer Amenities provided with this development (if applicable): G'I.(r,~N~.sl~~;~~ ~d /~~ J~A~6T ~ttt'. A~~t Who will own & maintain the pressurized irrigation system in this development? /x,~,S,~~J ~drt~K /~oI/ Which irrigation district does this property lie within?'/,/wlpA ~ /1rGJ~Lai~i~ "/R T2 . ~LST ,~ Primary irrigation source:~~~t p~ • ~~>~ i~ rw iJ Secondary: i3"' Y ~JA~T£i~. ~~t5 Rt~i,~u/.QLeO~ Square footage of landscaped areas to be irrigated (if primary or secondary point of connection is city water): c Residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of residential units: ~ Y Number of building lots: .5 Number of common and/or other lots: ,~ r ~~.~ ~; proposed number of dwelling units (for multi-family developments only): >: 1 Bedroom: ~ f~~~. 2 or more Bedrooms: Minimum square footage of structure(s) (excl. gazage): ,~D O '~. ~ Proposed building height: ,? t3 ~ Minimum property size (s.f): ~5~~ D 0 c~ Average property size (s.f.): ~,_,~~ Net density (DU/acre-excluding roads & alleys): Acreage of open space: .~ x';13 ~s Percentage of useable open space: ~jp ~o (See Chapter 3, Article G, for qualified open space) Type of open space provided in acres (i.e., landscaping, public, common, etc): ~C~./ g~ a ~t~ ~,.u~,~ 14~ irF Gross density (DU/acre-total land): ,~,, ~' Percentage of open space provided: f''~i ~~ Type of dwelling(s) proposed: ~ Single-family ^ Townhomes ^ Duplexes ^hulti-family Non-residential Project Summary (if applicable) ~ Number of building lots: ~ Other lots: ~ ' ~ A~N.iJ' ~. 5- rt t ~ TS Gross floor azea proposed: ~ (~po ~ . ! : Existing (if applicable): ~11~ Hours of opera"tion (days and hours): G~tl.![ Building height: ~.5~ ~/~,_ Percentage of site/project devoted to the following: ~~yy; Landscaping: ~.~ ~b Building: ~ b _ n v o - //~ /U Paving: sv~ <~ Total number of employees: ~w.v,K Maximum number of employees at any one time: ~'xwJ,~' ,_' Number and ages of students/children (if applicable): ~f a Seating capacity: Total number of parking spaces provided: ~~~~r °u~ Number of compact spaces provided: -- e Authori~tion Print applicant name: ~ 1" ~ ~ ! f ~~ N ~- Applicant signature: ~ Date: ~'~ ~o $ 660 E. Watertower e, Suite 202 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 Website: www.rrieridiancity.org 2 } ~ 7 ^ ,-. .] J J Tl D t l D T rl D A R D 1®T 'T' ,_ r - TO: Panning Director City of Meridian 660 E. Watertower Ln., Ste. 202 Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~,.~ DATE: April 1, 2008 RE: Bienville Square Subdivision - PP-OS-059 Time Extension Dear Anna: J We are requesting a Time Extension for recording of our Final Plat for Bienville Square Subdivision. After delays in ofF- site construction approval from Land Baron (6 months) and the Alleman Water User's Association, the project is currently under construction with an anticipated site completion date of July 1, 2008. The Preliminary Plat was approved by Council on May 2, 2006 and is set to expire on May 2, 2008. As such, we are requesting an extension of 6 months for the recording the Final Plat. Thank you in advance for your consideration and as always we look forward to working with you and your staff in the completion of this project. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, .. Robert C. Unger Vice President :~ rte: - • h .~~ RED CLIFF DEVELOPMENT • 2060 $. EAGLE ROADS MERIDL~IV~ IDAHO 83642 (208) 472-9219 • REDCLIFFDEV.COM •r. x a ~ U 7. VICINITY MAP c ri s L:: Yi ~ ...mx l~ r. ~] _ r I ~.,.-....~•. '1 " AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE OF IDAHO ) COUNTY OF ADA ) (name) (address) M/l ~R ~ b + wrtJ /D RN'r~ (city) (state) being first duly sworn upon, oath, depose and say: That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my permission to: >w /2~y ~L/FF b ~~/~ ~ OP ~ ~dG~ 5 . F_E6~ ~ r?n . ~Ridi~.v, ~D (name) (address) to submit the accompanyir;g application(s) pertaining to that property. 2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and its employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute a~ to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. 3. I hereby grant permission to City of Meridian staff to enter the subject property for the purpose of site inspections related to processing said application(s). ,~ Dated this ~ ~ day of ~,/~i ~ , 20_ ~ (mature SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. z_x -x 1 (Notary Public for Idaho) ''~~~•~ ~IRAk9~.,~~, Residing at: ~~.~~.•~L~-~~'1 i~~~~~ ~d '~ '•. ~pT~~p ~ My Commission Expires: ~~ .~ 1Ir ~~+ • pustit~ ~~: !~: .. ~ .4 PRELIMINARY PLAT DEVELOPMENT FEATURES TOTAL ACRES..... .............................. ~~ 27.36 ACRES : COMMERCIAL ACRES ............................ 7.22 ACRES MULTI-FANrILY ACRES .......................... 10.03 ACRES SINGLE FAMILrY ACRES ........................ 10.11 ACRES TOTAL RESIDENTIAL ACRES ................. 20.14 ACRES ,. TOTAL. LOTS ........................... ............. 101 x COMMERCIAL LOTS ............................... 7 OPEN SPACE LOTS .............................. 15 PRIVATE ROAD LOTS ............................ 3 FOUR-PLEX LOTS ................................ 22 (8 8 UNITS) .:~ 3 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ...........................54 DENSITY R15 ........................................8.77 UNITS/Ac. DENSITY R8 ..........................................5.34 UNITS/Ac. TOTAL DENSITY ...................................7.05 UNITS/Ac. EXISTING ZONING ..................................C-G/RUT PROPOSED ZONES ................................R8/R15 COMIVIERCIAL_ OPEN SPACE ...................23 ACRES - 3.2~ RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE .................. 3.30 ACRES - 16.4 TOTAL OPEN SPACE ........................... 3.53 ACRES - 12.9 ~v11NIMUM ''ACCEPTABLE LOT SIZE ....... 4,000 SgFt - R15 MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LOT SIZE ..'.... 5,000 SgFt - R8 ~ :rs r. :~ s L`-~ri `~ ~ r^S -~ aY x ~ ~, tier. ~:. i i •r.• ... ,~ ~r,~ p ie_ 1• ~_ x ~ >i~ ~ iYt ~~ ~^7-t ~ 1~ ~ ~~~s i - :g - ~~~ ,. [ "~ :r it ' Y9- t'ro= .. a. fif _ __ - 3_ .a~ --• JS f7; :rk + iF. 5~.~R ~-- ry - r ~~ - ---- -- - i _ i v . ~ ~' a~' .. - - ~ ... ;~ .~ re I - -- - - 3rys ..~ ~-'~` - -x -- - ti ~ n - - -- - I. I 1 I ..... 1 '.... . I _ _ ~- _ ~~ TAX "_ ;~ _ TOTAL __. ~ ~ ,, e: i i ~~ ~:,. _ ±r rs~ .. u n s~v r n .. r.•.