HomeMy WebLinkAboutRegency at River Valley RecsCITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
STAFF REPORT Hearing Date: April 22, 2008
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: E IDIA
Sonya Watters, Associate City Planner vE
(208) 884-5533
SUBJECT: Regency at River Valley (Revised) 2 1 2008
• AZ-08-003 City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Annexation and Zoning of 12.06 acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-40
(High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) and C-C (Community Business) (1.5
acres) zoning districts
• CUP-08-004
Conditional Use Permit for a multi -family residential development in a
proposed R-40 zoning district
• VAR 08 004-
Vafianee to UPC 11 314 4B whieh pr-ohibits flew aeeess peipits to state
highways; Fe"est to allow a empoFary aeeess
stiell time as E. River- Valley Read is -e�� Withdrawn
VAR-08-002
Variance to UDC Table 11-3C-6 for a reduction in the number of covered
parking spaces required for multi -family dwellings
The Commission heard these opplications at�mh�eublic hearin on March 6
9 , 2008. At the meedng on
March 6, the qRplicant decided to withdraw the VaHance (VAR-08-001) request for a teWorary
access to SH 55lEagle Road. At that meetinz the Commission voted to condnue the p aject until the
March Whmeeting so staff could gpdate the conditions of qpffoval (Staff had enkinall inc
y
draft conditions of qpproval because Staff was recommending several Anificant changes to the site
plan); so the site plan could be revised by the Wlicant,- and so comments1con'Wons could be
obtained from ACHD. On March 6, the maker of the motion for condnuance stated that they would
like to see the -following chg"es made to the site plan: 1) Add an emeffency access onl ji
All y d veway
ys Way; 21 Provide a 10-foot wide muld-use pathway on the site in accordance with Parks
Department comments, and 3) Remove the tem o access to Ea le Ro . The maker of the m n
P rM g ad
also stated that their recommendation for qpproval would be pref"ed on the ggplicant and NMID
reaching an Weement pertaining to the relocation of the Downey Sublateral. The Commission
sWorted the Variance (VAR-08-002) request for a reducdon in the number of covered pqrkin
vaces required. The opplicant has submitted a revised site plan, which staff has reviewed and
modt
fications to the staff Wort "coLdinXl
y.
Changes to the staff report since the 4arch 6'h version are in bold italics and underline.
1- SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST
The Applicant, Mason & Stanfield, Inc., has applied for Annexation and Zoning (AZ) of 12.06 acres
from RUT (Ada County) to R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres) and C-C (Community
Business) (1.5 acres). Concurrently, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is requested for a multi -family
residential development on 10.56 acres in a proposed R-40 zoning district. T-We A variances (VAR) to
Regency at River Valley (revised)
PAGE I
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
the Unified Development Code are is also requested as follows: 1)
Read upAil sueh time as E. River Valley Read is eenstrueted; and-24 Variance to UDC Table I I -3C-6
for a reduction in the number of parking spaces required for multi -family dwellings in covered
carports or garages
The applicant is proposing 204 multi -family living units within 9 apartment buildings, a clubhouse,
swimming pool area, a putting green, several gazebos, an entry water feature, pathways, extensive
landscaping, and a playground area.
The site is located at 2500 N. Eagle Road, approximately 1/2 mile north of the Fairview/Eagle
intersection on the east side of Eagle Road. The subject property is currently located within the
Urban Service Planning Area.
2. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
The subject applications (AZ, CUP, & VAR -Is) were submitted to the Planning Department for
concurrent review. By city code, the Planning & Zoning Commission is not required to hold a
hearing on or act on the two variance applications. However, because the variance requests -are is
integral to the project, staff recommends that the Commission, as part of their action, state a
preference on the two variance requests. Below, staff has provided a detailed analysis of the
proposed applications. Staff is recommending approval of the subject AZ and CUP applications
per the conditions of approval in Exhibit B and the Development Agreement provisions in
Section 10. Staff is reconnnending denial of the VAR application per the analysis in Section 10
and the rindings in Exhibit D. Staff is reconumnding severa! sigrAfleant changes to the site
plan. For- this Feason, and because conunents have not yet been Feceived from ACHD an
1TD, Staff is requesting that this project be heard by the Convnission on March 6' but that
the Com—E-ndssion defeF action untfl a later date to give the applicant time to make revisions to
the site plan, as staff has listed in Section 10 and Exhibit Bw
Commission he
the public hearing on March 20'", they moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and
CUP request.
a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Lars Anderson, Bach Homes; Scoff Stanfield, Mason Stanfield
Engineering
ii. In opposition: None
W. Commenting: Andrew Wilk
iv. Written testimony: David Meiner; Andrew Wilk
v. Staff presenting application: Caleb Hood; Sonya Wafters
vi. Other staff commenting on application: None
b. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission:
i. The addition of an emergency access driveway to the site from Allys Way;
ii. Support of the request for annexation of 1.5 acres with a C-C zoning designation i
the Variance recluest for a temporary access to Eagle Road is withdrawn;
W. Removal of one of the multi -family structures in order to provide covered parkin
as required by the UDC for multi -family developments,
iv. The request for a variance for a reduction in the number of covered parking space
required;
v. The encroachment of structures and landscapim within the easement for the
Stokesberry/Downey Lateral along the south boundary and the proposed relocation
of the lateral and easement further to the south;
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
vi. Allowance of a 5-foot wide multi -use pathway through the site within a public use
easement and signage identifying it as a public pathway if a 10-foot wide pathway is
constructed along Allys Way and E. River Valley Road, as approved by the Parks
Department;
c. Key Commission Chan2e(s) to Staff Recommendation:
i. Required an emergency access only driveway to Allys Way;
ii. Required a multi -use pathway on the site in accordance with Parks Department
comments;
iii. Removed the temporary access request (Variance) to Eagle Road; and
iv. Recommendation of approval is based on the applicant and NMID reaching a
a2reement pertaining to the relocation of the Downey Sublateral.
d. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council:
i. The Commission was supportive of the requested variance for a reduction in the
number of covered parking spaces required; staff is not supportive. If the parkin
variance is not 2ranted a new site plan should be submitted.
ii. Comments from ACHD have not yet been received.
iii. The applicant has not yet submitted a private street application as required in
Condition 1.2.3.
3. PROPOSED MOTION
Partial Approval/Partial Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Numbers AZ-08-
003 and CUP-08-004 and the request for- apiaexatien & zening of 10.56 aer-es to R 40; and dellial 0
the request for- annexa4ion & zening of 1.5 affeS k) G G, aSSeeiated with file ffumber- AZ 09 003 and
VAR 08 0 deny File Number VAR-08-002, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date
of April 22, 2008 with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.)
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve File Numbers AZ-08-
003, CUP-08-004, VAR 08 001 and VAR-08-002, as presented during the hearing, with the
following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) (You should state specific reasons for
approval of the variance.)
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Numbers AZ-08-003,
CUP-08-004, VAR 08 001, and VAR-08-002, as presented during the hearing, for the following
reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial of the annexation, conditional use permit, and
variance, and what the applicant could do to gain your approval in the future.)
Continuance
I move to continue File Numbers AZ-08-003, CUP-08-004, VAR 08 001, and VAR-08-002 to the
hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state
specific reason(s) for continuance.)
4. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
a. Site Address/Location:
2500 N. Eagle Road (Parcel #S1 104233914 & #S1 104233920)
NW V4of Section 4, T. 3N., R. I E.
b. Owners:
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
RAMI, LLC; MBJR, LLC; Eagle Mesa, LLC; Eagle Coulter, LLC; JACOM, LC
c. Applicant:
Mason & Stanfield, Inc.
314 Badiola Street
Caldwell, Idaho 83605
d. Representative: Lars Anderson, Bach Homes
e. Present Zoning: RUT (Ada County)
f. Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Mixed Use - Regional
g. Description of Applicant's Request:
From the applicant's narrative: "We are requesting annexation of two zones and an
accompanying CUP. The annexation request includes 1.5 acres (for C-C zone) for the westerly
portion adjacent to Eagle Road and 10.91 acres for an R-40 zone. The request complies with the
current Comprehensive Plan. The project will comply with the UDC with the exception of
covered parking and a teWeFaFy aeeess to N. Eagle Read." (See Applicant's letter for more
detail.)
1. Date of Site Plan (attached in Exhibit A): Mar -eh 15, 20 3/12/08 (stamped by R. Scott
Stanfield, P.E., and Darin Holzhey, P.L.S., en li3l/08)
2. Date of Landscape Plan (attached in Exhibit A): januafy 23, 2 1/08 (prepared by Lars
Anderson, Bach Homes)
5. PROCESS FACTS
a. The subject application will in fact constitute an Annexation & Zoning as determined by City
Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of UDC I I -5A-2, a public hearing is required before the
Commission and City Council on this matter.
b. The subject application will in fact constitute a Conditional Use Permit as determined by City
Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of UDC 11 -5A-2, a public hearing is required before the
Commission and City Council on this matter.
c. The subject applications will in fact constitute a Variance as determined by City Ordinance. By
reason of the provisions of UDC I I -5A-2, a public hearing is required before the City Council on
this matter.
d. Newspaper notifications published on: February 18, 2008 and March 3, 2008 (Commission);
March 3 1, and April 14, 2008 (City Council)
e. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: February 12, 2008 (Conin-lission); Marc
28, 2008 (City Council)
f. Applicant posted notice on site by: February 22, 2008 (Conin-lission); April 9, 2008 (City
Council)
6. LAND USE
a. Existing Land Use(s): This property is curTently vacant with some existing outbuildings
associated with a former residence.
b. Description of Character of Surrounding Area: This area contains a mix of single-family
residential properties, commercially zoned vacant land, and office uses.
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 4
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
c. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning:
I . North: Vacant commercial property, zoned C-G
2. East: Vacant commercial property, zoned C-G and single-family residences in Redficather
Estates subdivision, zoned R-4
3. South: Vacant property (in the process of being zoned C-G — Meridian Town Center), zoned
RUT (Ada County)
4. West: Single-family residence and vacant property, zoned RUT (Ada County); office uses
(on the west side of Eagle Road), zoned L-0; and vacant property, zoned C-G
d. History of Previous Actions:
The following applications were submitted for this property in 2006 and all were denied by the
City Council:
• Annexation and Zoning (AZ-06-035) of 12.06 acres to C-C (Community Business District)
(1. 5 0 acres) and R-40 (High Density Residential) (10. 5 6 acres)
• Conditional Use Pen -nit (CUP-06-022) for a multi -family development consisting of 204
multi -family residential units
• Private Street (PS-06-006) request adjacent to the proposed multi -family units
• Variance (VAR-06-014) request to UDC I I -3C-6A to provide less than the required number
of covered parking stalls for multi -family dwellings
• Variance (VAR-06-015) request to UDC 11 -4.3.27133 to provide less than 80 square feet of
private, usable open space for each multi -family dwelling unit
• Variance (VAR-06-016) request to UDC I I -3h-4132 to construct a vehicular access to a state
highway at a location other than a section line road or the half mile mark between sections
e. Existing Constraints and Opportunities:
1 . Public Works:
Location of sewer: This property is proposing to connect to sewer mains located in Eagle
Road.
Location of water: This property is proposing to connect to water service mains located in
Eagle Road.
Issues or concerns: None
2. Canals/Ditches hTigation: The South Slough runs along the northern boundary of this site.
The Downey Sublateral runs along the south boundary of the site.
3. Existing trees: There are existing trees on the site that are proposed to be removed. The
applicant shall comply with the mitigation requirements listed in UDC 11 -313-1 OC.
4. Floodplain: This property does not lie within the floodplain or floodway.
5. Hazards: The South Slough is located along the northern boundary of this site and may
create a water hazard for small children as it will remain uncovered.
6. Proposed Zoning: R-40 (High Density Residential) (10.56 acres)& C-C (Community
Business) (1.5 acres)
7. Size of Property: 12.06 acres
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 5
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
f. Landscaping
1. Width of street buffer(s): A 35-foot wide buffer is required along Eagle Road/SH 55, an
arterial street; a 20-foot wide buffer is required along Allys Way, a collector street, and a 20-
foot wide buffer will be required along the future E. River Valley Road, a collector street.
Street buffer landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC
11-313-7C.
2. Width of buffer(s) between land uses: A 25-foot wide buffer is required in commercial
districts adjacent to any existing residential uses. There is currently an existing residence
(parcel #1104234102) located at the south boundary of the portion of the property proposed
to be zoned commercially. If the residential use of this property exists at the time of
development (i.e. CZC submittal), a 25-foot wide buffer shall be provided along that
boundary. Buffers to adjoining land uses shall be installed in accordance with the standards
listed in UDC 11 -3B-9C.
3. Percentage of site as open space: 18% or 1.91 acres of useable open space
4. Other landscaping standards: Parking lot landscaping shall be installed per the standards
listed in UDC 11 -3B-8C.
g. Amenities: Per UDC I I -4-3-27D.2, 4+ amenities are required for this development with at least
one from each category (i.e. quality of life, open space, recreation). The following amenities are
proposed: walking trails, clubhouse, water feature, swimming pool, a putting green, several
gazebos, and a tot lot. The applicant has complied with this requirement.
h. Off -Street Parking: UDC 11 -3C-6 requires multi -family dwellings with 1 bedroom to have 2
parking spaces per unit, 1 in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 48 ]-bedroom units,
which requires 48 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces. Multi -family dwellings with more
than I bedroom are required to have 2 parking spaces per unit in a covered carport or garage. The
site plan shows 156 units with more than I bedroom, which requires 312 covered spaces. A total
of 360 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces are required on the sitefor a total of408 spaces.
The applicant has provided 2-9-5-299 covered spaces and -144 109 uncovered spacesfor a total of
408 spaces. A variance is requestedfor a reduction in the number of coveredparking spaces
required.
i. Required Dimensional Standards for Multi -family Residential Use in the R-40 Zone, per UDC
11-4-3-27B and 11-2A-8:
1. Minimum Building Setback: A minimum 20-foot wide setback is required along the south
and east property boundaries adjacent to E. River Valley Road and Allys Way because of the
required 20-foot wide street buffers (per UDC Table I I -2A-8) and a minimum 1 0-foot wide
setback is required along the north and west property boundaries (per UDC 11 -4-3 -27B).
2. Maximum Building Height: 60 feet
Summary of Proposed Streets and/or Access: Access to the site is proposed from two access
points to/from the future extension of E. River Valley Road. A varianee for- tempefar-y aeeess to
Eagle Read dffeugh the pr-epei4y pr-epesed to be zoned G C is also requested; Staff is no
suppeftive of the pmpesed tempefafy aeeess to Eagle Read The applicant is proposing to
construct 25' 26' drive aisles within the multi -family development; Staff is requesting that
the applicant submit a private street application and that minimum 26-foot wide private
streets are provided. The applicant is proposing to construct a segment of Allys Way on the east
boundary of the site in alignment with the existing Allys Way north of the site, on the north side
of Ustick Road; Staff is supportive of Allys Way being constructed. An emergency onl access
to Allys Way to the east is not proposed; Staff is Fequesting an aeeess to i�41ys Way be pfevide
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 6
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
supportive of this access.
ITP submitted a letteF to the City peAaining to the requested aeeess to Eagle Read. The
states that 1T-D has tabled their- deeisien FegaMing the aeeess unAil they have the oppefkmity to
diseuss this appheation and applieations ffem neighbefing developmepAsm-fifflAhew- ;With the City.
Staff tr4ed eentaeting 14;P en this mamer but as er the 19rint date ef this ovpert-,- staff has netye
reeeived a eag baekftem ITP.
Further, as of the print date of this report, comments have not been received from ACHD.
However, Staff spoke with Matt Edmonds at ACHD and he stated that the applicant will be
required to construct half the street section of E. River Valley Road abutting the site consisting of
24 feet of pavement and a 7-foot wide sidewalk (as proposed by the applicant). The applicant is
proposing to dedicate and construct the whole right-of-way for Allys Way on the eastern portion
of the site. Matt did not think that an emergency access point to Allys (as required by City Staff)
to/from the site would be a problem. Further, ACHD is requiring a road trust deposit for half of
the construction cost of the bridge over the South Slough.
Please see Section 10, Analysis, and Exhibit B of this reportfor more information.
7. COMMENTS MEETING
On February 15, 2008 a joint agency and department meeting was held with service providers in this
area. The agencies and departments present include: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian Parks
Department, Meridian Public Works Department, Meridian Police Department, and the Sanitary
Services Company. Staff has included comments, conditions and recommended actions in Exhibit B
below.
8. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS
This property is designated "Mixed Use — Regional" on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use
Map. In Chapter VII of the Comprehensive Plan, this designation is defined in part as an area that is
situated in highly visible or transitioning parts of the City where innovative and flexible design
opportunities are encouraged. The MU-R designation allows for over 200,000 square feet of non-
residential uses, residential densities ranging from 3 to 40-dwelling units per acre, mixed use
neighborhood and mixed use commercial uses, as well as regional commercial uses such as
entertainment and employment centers and clean industry. Staff believes that the requested C-C and
R-40 zoning of the property with 17.86 dwelling units per acre planned for the multi -family portion of
the development, complies with the MU-R designation for this property (please see Analysis, Section
10 below for more information).
Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to
the proposed development (staff analysis in italics below policy):
Chapter V11, Goal 111, Objective A, Action I - Require that development projects have
planned for the provision of all public services.
"en the City established its Area of City Impact, it planned to provide City services to the
subject property. The City of Meridian plans to provide municipal services to the subject
property in thefollowing manner. -
Sanitary sewer and water service will be extended to the project at the developer's
expense.
> The subject lands currently lie within thejurisdiction of the Meridian Rural Fire District.
Once annexed the lands will be under thejurisdiction of the Meridian City Fire
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 7
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
Department, who currently shares resource and personnel with the Meridian Rural Fire
Department
> The subject lands currently lie within thejurisdiction of the Ada County Sheriff's Office.
Once annexed, the lands will be serviced by the Meridian Police Department (MPD).
> The roadways adjacent to the subject lands are currently owned and maintained by the
Ada County Highway District (ACHD). This service will not change.
> The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian School District No. 2. Ais
service will not change.
> The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian Library District. This service
will not change and the Meridian Library District should suffer no revenue loss as a
result of the subject annexation.
Municipal, fee -supported, services will be provided by the Meridian Building Department,
the Meridian Public Works Department, the Meridian Water Department, the Meridian
Wastewater Department, the Meridian Planning Department, Meridian Utility Billing
Services, and Sanitary Services Company.
Chapter V, Goal 1, Objective A, Action 4 — Develop and maintain greenbelts along
waterways.
The applicant is proposing to construct a section of multi -use pathway on the site that will
connect to the future master pathway planned along the north side of the South Slough via a
pedestrian bridge at the northwest corner of the site.
0 Chapter V, Goal 1, Objective A, Action 11 — hnprove and protect creeks (Five Mile, Eight
Mile, South Slough ... etc.) throughout commercial, industrial, and residential areas.
The South Slough, which runs along the northern boundary of this site, should be improved
andprotected during development of the site.
Chapter V, Goal I, Objective A. I — Preserve and conserve our waterways, wetlands, wildlife
habitat, and other natural resources.
The South Slough, a natural waterway, runs along the northern boundary of this site. As a
natural waterway, it will remain open and should be preserved.
0 Chapter VII, Goal 1, Objective D, Action 9 - Require new residential development to provide
permanent perimeter fencing to contain construction debris on site and prevent windblown
debris from entering adjacent agricultural and other properties.
The applicant is proposing to construct a 6-foot tall chain linkfence along the north property
boundary adjacent to the South Slough in accordance with UDC 11-3A-6B3. Six-foot tall
viny/fencing is proposed along the west property boundary. Temporary construction fencing
shall be constructed prior to release of building permits in all areas where permanentfencing
is not proposed, to contain debris during construction.
0 Chapter V, Goal III, Objective D, Action 3 — Require all new parking lots to provide
landscaping in internal islands.
Landscaping is shown on the landscape plan within the parking areas in planter islands for
the residential portion of the development. All parking lot landscaping shall be installed per
the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C
0 Chapter V11, Goal IV, Objective C, Action I - Protect existing residential properties from
incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels.
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 8
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
The applicant is proposing a residential zone adjacent to Redfeather Subdivision, a
residential subdivision, at the east boundary of the site and the existing residence at the
southwest corner of the site. The extension of Allys Way also separates this site from
Red/eather Subdivision. If the property adjacent to Eagle Road is zoned commercially as
proposed, a 25-foot wide landscape buffer is required to be constructed adjacent to
residential uses. Stafffinds that the proposed residential development should be compatible
with the existing residentialproperties in the area.
Chapter VH, Goal 1, Objective C, Action 4 — Require new residential development to meet
development standards regarding landscaping, signage, fences, and walls, etc.
The Applicant will be required to construct a 20-foot wide landscape buffer along E. River
Valley Road that complies with UDC 11-3B-7, Landscape Buffers along Streets. All signage
proposedfor the site must be approved through a sign permit and shall comply with UDC I I-
3D-10, Table 2. Fencingproposed on the site shall comply with UDC 11-3A-7.
Chapter V11, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 10 — Support a variety of residential categories
(low-, medium-, and high -density single-family, multi -family, townhouses, duplexes,
apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of
affordable housing opportunities.
Staff believes that the proposed high -density multi -family residential development will assist
in providing a variety of residential housing opportunities in the City.
9. UNIEFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
a. Schedule of Uses: Unified Development Code (UDQ 11 -2A-2 lists multi -family developments as
a conditional use in the R-40 zoning district. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11 -4-3-27) apply to
multi -family developments; please see Section 10, Analysis below for more information. UDC
Table I I -2B-2 lists several uses that are principal permitted uses, conditional uses, and prohibited
uses in the proposed C-C zoning district. Among the principal permitted uses are animal care
facilities; indoor/outdoor arts, entertainment or recreation facilities; building material, garden
equipment and supplies; churches, group daycares, education institutions, financial institutions,
flex space, fuel sales facility, healthcare or social services, information industry, Laundromat,
mortuary, nursery or urban farm, parks, personal or professional service, public/quasi-public use,
restaurant, retail store, minor vehicle repair, vehicle washing facility, vertical integrated
residential project, etc.
b. Purpose Statement of the Proposed Districts:
Residential Districts: Per UDC I I -2A- 1, the purpose of the residential districts is to provide for a
range of housing opportunities consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Connection to
the City of Meridian water and sewer systems is a requirement for all residential districts.
Residential districts are distinguished by the allowable density of dwelling units per acre and
corresponding housing types that can be accommodated within the density range.
Commercial Districts: Per UDC 11 -2B- 1, the purpose of the commercial districts is to provide for
the retail and service needs of the community in accord with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
Four districts are designated which differ in the size and scale of commercial structures
accommodated in the district, the scale and mix of allowed commercial uses, and the location of
the district in proximity to streets and highways.
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 9
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
10. ANALYSIS
Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation:
is
that
_ F.'
the G G
Jr-., "..—
to Eagle Road not be annexe
alsO Feeommending
FOF
these
zoned
because
aFea adjaeent
have been meeiVed fFom
this time.
ACHD 1TD,
Feasons,
Staff
and
is that
comments
this
not yet
be heard by the Conmiission on
and
&_ Nut
that the
requesting
Conwnission defeF
PFGject
a
later date to the applicant ---
to
to the
landseape
aCtiOn Until
give
Staff has detailed analy
make Fevisions
listed
site plan and
to
plan.
faVOFable
provided
on the multi
and changes
family POFtiOn
needed
of this development
proceed with
below.
a
recommendation
1. Annexation & Zoning (AZ): Based on the policies and goals contained in the
Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map designation of Mixed Use — Regional,
Staff believes that the requested R-40 and C-C zoning districts are appropriate for this
property. HoweVeF, Staff does not believe that annexation of the 1.5 ReFe POFtiOn Of the
PFOPeFty PFOPosed fOF C C zoning is in the best iHteFest of the City at this time f0F the
fOROWiRg Feason! Staff believes that access to the portion of the property proposed to be
zoned C-C and all of the properties fronting Eagle Road/SH 55, south of the South
Slough, should be provided from the south via a backage road that connects to the
future E. River Valley Road and that a cross-access/ingress-egresE easement should be
provided to the properties to the north and south from the subject property.-
, and4hfA
tempoFaFy aeeess to/&om Eagle Road/814 55 to the site should not be allowed. jSee
Nlar-ianee (NIAR 08 001) analysis below for more WOFMatiOffij Staff believes that Until
the residential property to the south re -develops, the proposed commercial portion of
the property will not be able to access E. River Valley Road, and should not use Eagle
Road as access. FuFther-, Staff believes that all 4 of the properties fronting Eaglee
Road/SH 55, south of the South Slough, should be aeeessed via a baeliage road to/&o
E. River- Valley Road. FoF this FeaSOR, Staff is not Feeommending appr-oval of the
annexation for- the eommeFeial portion of the pFoper-ty. Staff is recommending approva
of the annexation and zonin2 of 1.5 acres to C-C (see legal description & exhibit map fo
C-C zone in Exhibit C.3).
Staff is however-, supportive of the requested R-40 zoning designation for the eastern
portion of the property proposed for multi -family residential use for the following
reasons: The Comprehensive Plan future land use designation for this property of MU-
R allows for residential densities of 3 to 40 units per acre. The applicant is proposing
204 residential units within a proposed R-40 zoning district, which allows for the
property to develop within the desired densities stated in the Comprehensive Plan for
this area. Further, Staff believes that a multi -family development would be appropriate
and would contribute to the variety of uses in this area. For these reasons, Staff is
recommending of approval of the annexation and zoning of 10.56 acres to R-40 (see
legal description & exhibit map for R-40 zone in Exhibit C.2).
Please see Exhibit D for a detailed analysis of the required facts and findings for an
annexation & zoning request.
The legal description submitted with the application (stamped on June 14, 2006 by Darin
Holzhey, PLS) is accurate and meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and Idaho
State Tax Conunission.
UDC I I -513-3D2 provides the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council the
authority to require a property owner to enter into a Development Agreement (DA) with the
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 10
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
City of Meridian that may require some written commitment for all future uses. Because of
the nature of the development and the high density zoning district proposed by the
applicant, Staff believes that a DA is necessary to ensure that the site develops in a
manor that is consistent with said plans. Staff has included a list of recommended DA
provision below. If the Commission or Council feels additional development agreement
provisions are necessary, staff recommends a clear outline of the commitments of the
developer being required.
Development Agreement: A Development Agreement (DA) will be required as part of
annexation of this property. Prior to annexation approval, a DA shall be entered into between
the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and
the developer. The applicant shall contact the City Attorney, Bill Nary, at 888-4433, within 6
months of City Council approval to initiate this process. The DA shall include, at minimum,
the following:
a. A maximum of 204 multi -family residential units shall be allowed to be constructed
on the site.
b. A minimum 5,868 square foot clubhouse shall be constructed on the site, as
proposed.
c. At a minimum, amenities shall be constructed on the site as proposed on the site
plan (i.e. clubhouse, water feature, swimming pool, walking trails, tot lot, gazebos,
etc.).
d. All multi -family structures shall comply with the architectural standards listed in
UDC 11-4-3-27E. Structures shall be constructed on the site in accordance with the
elevations attached in Exhibit A.
e. The site/structures shall comply with the Specific Use Standards listed in UDC 11-4-
3-27 for multi -family developments.
f. The applicant shall comply with the parking standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6 for
multi -family developments as follows: for 1 bedroom units, there shall be two
parking spaces with at least one in a covered carport or garage; and for units with
more than one bedroom, 2 parking spaces shall be provided, both in a covered
carport or garage. No variance to this standard is granted.
g. A legally binding document shall be recorded that states the maintenance and
ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including, but
not limited to, structures, parking, common areas, and other development features,
per UDC 11-4-3-27G.
h. Access to this site shall be provided from E. River Valley Road and an emergency
only access shall be provided from Allys Way. Access to Eagle Road is prohibited.
i. The applicant shall dedicate right-of-way and construct Allys Way in accordance
with ACHD standards, in alignment with Allys Way north of the site, on the north
side of Ustick Road, prior to release of occupancy of any structure on this site.
j. The applicant shall construct (or have available) at least half the street section of E.
River Valley Road (24 feet of pavement and 7-foot wide sidewalk) in accordance
with ACHD standards, prior to release of occupancy of any structure on this site.
k. All existing buildings on the site shall be removed prior to release of building
permits for this development.
1. Twenty-six foot wide private streets shall be provided within the site in accordance
with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4.
m. A 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along the future extension of E. River
Valley Road, per UDC Table 11-2A-8. Landscaping shall be provided in said
buffer in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C, Landscape
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE I I
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
Buffers along Streets. If NMID will not allow landscaping (i.e. trees) within their
easementfor the Downey Sublateral and if there is not sufficient room outside of the
easement for the street buffer, the applicant shall provide an additional 5-foot wide
stripfor landscaping outside of the NMID easement, per UDC 11-3B-70b.
n. The Downey Sublateral easement along the southern boundary of the site shall
either be relocated so that structures do not encroach within the easement OR the
structures shall be relocated outside of the easement, prior to submittal of the first
Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the parking and common areas.
o. A 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along Allys Way, per UDC Table 11-
2A-8. Landscaping shall be provided in said buffer in accordance with the standards
listed in UDC 11-3B-7C, Landscape Buffers along Streets.
p. Landscaping shall be provided on the site in accordance with the specific use
standards for multi -family developments listed in UDC 11 -4-3 -27F.
q. The applicant shall construct 6-foot tall vinyl fencing along the west property
boundary and 6-foot tall chain link fencing along the north side of the property
adjacent to the South Slough as depicted on the landscape plan. Temporary
construction fencing is required to be installed where permanent fencing is not
proposed, around the residential portion of the site prior to issuance of building
permits to contain debris during construction. Fencing shall be constructed in
accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7.
r. A minimum 5-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer is required adjacent to parking
and vehicular use areas along the north boundary of the site and adjacent to the
existing residence on the west boundary of the site, per UDC 11-3B-8C. Said buffer
is required to be planted with one tree per 35 linear feet and shrubs, lawn, or other
vegetative ground cover. If NMID will not allow trees within their easementfor the
South Slough, the applicant may apply for Alternative Compliance in accordance
with UDC 11 -5B-5.
s. A 10-foot wide multi -use pathway and bridge over the South Slough shall be
constructed on the site in accordance with the Parks Department conditions
contained in Exhibit B and the standards in the Master Pathways Plan and UDC 11-
3A-8.
t. With the first CZC application, include mitigation details for the 9 existing trees on
the site, consisting of 120 caliper inches, proposed to be removed, in compliance
with UDC 11-3B-10. Contact Elroy Huff, City Arborist, 888-3579 for more
details.
u. The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) for approval
of all of the parking and common areas on the site prior to submittal of CZC's for
structures.
v. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance is required prior to issuance of a building
permit for any and all of the proposed multi -family structures within this
development. All structures must substantially comply with the building elevations
submitted with this application (see Exhibit A), the architectural standards listed in
UDC 11-4-3-27E for multi -family developments, and conditions of approval and
DA provisions listed in Exhibit B of this report. NOTE. A CZC ypplication may
include multi —P
plelall multi-fatn�ly structures within the develo ment.
w. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance is required prior to issuance of a buildin
permit for the commercial portion of the development. Because the commercial
portion of the property is located adiacent to an entrVway corridor (Eagl
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 12
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
Road), the future structure(s) and site shall be subject to the design standards
listed in UDC 11-3A-19C.
x. Development of the C-C zoned portion of the site shall not occur until such time
as access is provided to/from E. River Valley Road or some other
frontage/backage street; direct lot access to Ea2le Road is prohibited.
y. A backage road shall be constructed on the east side of the C-C zoned portion of
the site and a cross-access/ingress-egress easement shall be provided to the
properties to the north and south for an extension of the backage road and
future access to E. River Valley Road. A copy said cross-access/ingress-e2ress
easement shall be provided to the Planning Department prior to issuance of the
issuance of a certificate of zoning compliance application for the first multi-
family building.
2. Conditional Use Permit (CUP): The applicant has submitted a site plan (stamped by Scott
Stanfield on 1,131�09 3/12/08, included as Exhibit A.2). The site plan depicts 9 multi -family
residential structures consisting of a total of 204 residential units and a 5,868, square foot
clubhouse for the portion of the site proposed to be zoned R-40. These units consist of 28 1 -
bedroom units consisting of 83 3 square feet (s.f.) each; 20 1 -bedroom Executive units
consisting of 871 s.f. each; 104 2-bedroom units consisting of 1,037 s.f. each; 28 2-bedroom
Executive units consisting of 1, 110 s.f. each; and 24 3-bedrom units consisting of 1,228 s.f.
each (see floor plan of multi -family units in Exhibit A. 10). The overall square footage of
residential uses proposed for the property is 209,144 s.f. The applicant states that this project
will not be phased but may take a couple of years to construct.
Parking is provided on the site for the multi -family units as follows: There are 7 garage
structures depicted on the plan that contain 6 parking spaces each for a total of 42 enclosed
spaces; 25a257 carport parking spaces are provided that allow for a total of 295299 covered
spaces; and 44-3 109 open stalls are provided for a total of 408 parking stalls provided on the
site (see coveredparking analysis belowfor more information on compliance with UDC
standards). Xate., The tetal number of eavered1gark-ing spaeesshawn an Me site plan i-9
ineeiweetT it should be 295 instead of 299, Per UDC 11-3C-5B, all off-street parking areas
shall be provided with a substantial wheel restraint to prevent cars from encroaching
upon abutting private and public property or overhanging beyond the designated
parking stall dimensions. Wheel stops are not depicted on the site plan. The applicant
must either install wheel stops for all parking adjacent to sidewalks or landscaping or
the sidewalk or landscape area may be widened 2 feet to allow for vehicle overhang, and
the stall length may be reduced by 2 feet (from 19' to 17'). Bicycle parking is also
required on the site as follows: 1 bicycle parking space is required for every 25 proposed
vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof, per UDC 11-3C-6G. Because 408 parking
stalls are proposed on the site, 16 bicycle spaces are required to be provided. As a
provision of the DA, the applicant shall submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZQ
for approval of all of the parking and common areas on the site prior to submittal of CZCs
for structures.
Several amenities are proposed on the site in compliance with LTDC standards (see amenities
analysis belowfor more information).
The property proposed to be zoned C-C is included on the site plan with a conceptual plan of
how the property may develop in the future; however, no development of the 1.5 acre C-C
property is proposed at this time. If the property is annexed, a backage road should be
constructed along the east boundary of the commercial district, in compliance with the
standards listed in UDC 11-3H-4B3. Further, a cross-access/ingress-egress easement
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 13
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
should be provided to the properties to the north and south of the site. No development
of this site should occur until the backage road is connected to River Valley Road.
Per UDC I I -2A-2, Multi -family Developments require conditional use permit approval and
must comply with the Specific Use Standards listed in UDC 11 -4-3 -27 as follows:
a. Setbacks: Buildings shall provide a minimum setback of 10 feet, unless a greater
setback is otherwise required by the UDC. (UDC Table I I -2A-7 requires a greater
setback of 15 feet in the rear.) The building envelopes shown on the site plan meet the
minimum setback requirements stated. However, the structures shown along the south
boundary encroach approximately l2jeet into the Nampa Meridian Irrigation
District's easementfor the Downey Sublateral. (See discussion below under "ditches,
canals, & laterals.'q
b. Service areas: On -site service areas, outdoor storage areas, waste storage, disposal
facilities, and transformer or utility vaults shall be fully screened from view from any
public street. The Applicant shall comply with this requirement.
Private, usable open space: A minimum of 80 square feet of private, usable open space
shall be provided for each unit. This requirement can be satisfied through porches, patios,
decks, and/or enclosed yards. Landscaping, entryway and other access ways shall not
count toward this requirement. Private usable open space is proposedfor each unit that
exceeds the minimum amount required by the UDC (I bedroom units contain 84 square
feet of deck area, and 2 & 3 bedroom units contain 81 squarefeet of deck area)(See
floorplan attached in Exhibit A. 10.) Staff is supportive of the proposed private, usable
open space.
d. Developments with 20 units or more shall provide the following: A property
management office, a maintenance storage area, a central mailbox location (including
provisions for parcel mail), and a directory and map of the development at a convenient
location. This development does contain more than 20 units and will comply with this
requirement. A property management office and central mailbox location with parcel
storage isproposed within the clubhouse (see clubhousefloor plan in Exhibit A. 11). A
directory and map of the development is shown at the entrance of the development on the
landscape plan (see Exhibit A. 3). The applicant states that the maintenance storage area
will be located within garage building #L Staff is supportive of the proposed amenities.
e. Covered Parking: UDC 11-3C-6 requires that multifamily developments shall provide
parking as follows: for I bedroom units, there shall be two parking spaces with one in a
covered carport or garage; and for units with more than one bedroom, 2 parking spaces
shall be provided in a covered carport or garage. The siteplan shows 48 ]-bedroom
units, which requires 48 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces. The site plan shows
156 units with more than I bedroom, which requires 312 covered spaces. A total of 408
stalls; 360 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces are required on the site. The
applicant has provided 2-95 299 covered spaces and 44-3109 uncovered spaces. A
variance is requestedfor a reduction in the number of coveredparking spaces required
from 360 to M 299. Staff is not supportive of the proposedparking variance. (see
Variance analysis below.)
f. Common Open Space Design Requirements: UDC 11-4-3.27C requires a minimum of
250 square feet of outdoor common open space for each unit containing more than 500
square feet and up to 1,200 square feet of living area, and 350 square feet for each unit
containing more than 1,200 square feet of living area. (The common open space shall be
not less than 400 square feet in area, and shall have a minimum length and width
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 14
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
dimension of 20 feet.) Based on the squarefootage of the proposed units, a total of
53,400 squarefeet of common open space is required,- 83,312 squarefeet of open space
is proposed on the site plan, which complies with this requirement.
f. Amenities: UDC 11 -4-3.27 requires that multi -family developments with 75 units or
more provide 4 amenities with at least one from each category (i.e. quality of life, open
space, or recreation). Further, for multi -family developments with more than 100 units,
the decision making body shall require additional amenities commensurate to the size of
the proposed development. Because 204 units are proposed with this development at
least 4 amenities are required. Staff believes that the applicant more than complies with
this requirement by providing thefollowing qualifying amenities: 1) walking trails, 2)
clubhouse, 3) waterfeature, 4) swimmingpool, 5) a putting green, 6) several gazebos,
and 7) a tot lot.
g. Elevations: Elevations are required to meet the architectural standards set forth in UDC
11 -4-3 -27E. The applicant is proposing 9 multi -family structures, 5 ofwhich consist of
different elevations (they aren't all the same). The structures are allproposed to have
brick veneer masonry, stucco, stone veneer, andfiberglass-reinforced asphalt shingles.
All of the structures are 2-3 stories in height, have the same architectural design and
appearance but are different in size based on how many units they contain. One single -
story clubhouse structure is also proposed with the same construction materials as the
multi -family structures. No colors are listedfor the structures on the elevations but the
colored drawing the applicant submitted contained in Exhibit A. 6 depict 4 different
colors on one structure. All of the structures within the development should have a mix of
colors and materials as depicted on the colored elevation and architectural elevations
contained in Exhibit A. The proposed elevations appear to comply with the architectural
standards. Ifapproved, full compliance with the elevation requirements cited in UDC 11 -
4-3-27E, and the elevations submitted with the subject CUP, will be required with the
future issuance of Certificate ofZoning Compliances on this site.
h. Landscaping: Per UDC 11-4-3-27, all street facing elevations shall have landscaping
along their foundation. The foundation landscaping shall meet the following standards:
> The landscaped area shall be at least 3-feet wide;
> For every 3 linear feet of foundation, an evergreen shrub having a minimum mature
height of 24 inches shall be planted; and
> Ground cover plants shall be planted in the remainder of the landscaped area.
i. Maintenance and Ownership Responsibilities: Per UDC 11 -4-3 -27G, a legally binding
document shall be recorded that states the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for
the management of the development, including, but not limited to, structures, parking,
common areas, and other development features.
Access: Access to the site is proposed from one teWer-ar-y full aeeess paint te Eagle
Read/SH 55 and &o the future River Valley Road and an emergency only access to/from
Allys Wa . A 26 feet wide aspWt read is depieted on the site plan ffem Eagle Re�,
thfough the eea*nervial afea, and into the residential peftien of the development. Per- UDG
! 1 3H 4b, no new appr-eae-hes dkeetly aeeessing a state highway shall be allowed. A varianee
is requested for- the pr-eposed tempefar-y aeeess (see analysis belew). The appheant proposes
that the aeeess would epAy be temper-ar-y and that it would be vaea4ed upon the extension of F.
River- Valley Read, at wf4e-h time the pr-epe#y would take aeeess fFem R4ver- Valley. Sta
does not suppeA the temper-ar-y aeeess to Eagle Road and is r-eeenureending that aeeess b
pr-evided to the site ftem the E. Rivef Valley Read and Allys Way. The appheat# has applied
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 15
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
for- a peffr& fer- a temper-ar-y right ifb4r-ight otit aeeess to Eagle Read fFefn the id
Tfanspai4atien PepaAfnepA; however-, 1T_D has not yet issued a deeision as of the pr-ifit date Of
this r-epei4. FuAhef, as of the pfipA date of this r-epet4, eeffffnents have "Ot been r-eeeived 40
AG14D. However, Staff spoke with Matt Edmonds at ACHD and he stated that the applicant
will be required to construct half the street section of E. River Valley Road abutting the site
consisting of 24 feet of pavement and a 7-foot wide sidewalk (as proposed by the applicant).
The applicant is proposing to dedicate and construct the whole right-of-way for Allys Way on
the eastern portion of the site. Matt did not think that an emergency access point to Allys (as
required by City Staff) to/from the site would be a problem. Further, ACHD is requiring a
road trust deposit for half of the construction cost of the bridge over the South Slough.
Stub Streets: No stub street . . 1 on the site plan, The Fire Department is
requesting that a stub street be provided from the site to Allys Way because of fire code
requirements for the number of dwellings proposed; the applicant has revised the site
plan to include an emeri!ency only access to Allys Way, which staff is supportive of.
Staff has included a condition requiring construction of and access to Allys Way for this
development.
Ally's Way: The future alignment of Ally's Way, which exists north of the site, north of
Ustick Road at the 1/4 mile, lies along the eastern boundary of the subject property. As part of
the development of this site, the applicant will be required to dedicate right-of-way and
construct Allys Way in accordance with ACHD standards. Further, staff has included a
DA provision that an emergencV onl access be provided to/from Allys Way for this
development.
Existing Residences/Buildings: The site currently contains some existing outbuildings that
were associated with a previous residence. The remainder of the site consists of vacant land.
All existing buildings shall be removed prior to release of building permits for this
development.
Fencing: The applicant is proposing to construct 6-foot tall vinyl fencing along the west
property boundary and 6-foot tall chain link fencing along the north side of the property
ad acent to the South Slough. Temporary construction fencing is required to be installed
where permanent fencing is not proposed, around the residential portion of the site prior to
issuance of building permits to contain debris during construction. Fencing shall be
constructed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11 -3 A-7.
Landscape Plan: The applicant submitted a conceptual landscape plan for the residential
portion of the site dated 1,123/07 1/08. The applicant should note the following and/or make
revisions to the landscape/site plan as follows:
Per UDC Table 11-2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along the
future extension of E. River Valley Road, as proposed. ff NMID will not allow
landscyping (i.e. trees) within their easement for the Downey Sublateral and if
there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the street buffer, th
qpplicant shaU provide an additional 5-foot wide str�p for landscAping outside o
the NMID easement, per UDC 11-3B-7C]b;
• Per LJDC Table I I -2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer will be required along Allys
Way;
• Per LJDC Table 11 -2A-8, a 3 5 -foot wide street buffer will be required along Eagle
Road/SH 55, an entryway corridor (upon development of the commercial portion of
the site when annexed).
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 16
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
• If the property proposed to be annexed with a C-C zoning district is annexed, and at
the time of CZC submittal there is a residence adjacent, a 25-foot wide buffer shall be
provided along the east and/or south boundaries of the commercial site.
• Per UDC 11-3B-8C, a 5-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer is required
adjacent to parldng and vehicular use areas along the north boundary of the site
and adjacent to the existing residence on the west boundary of the site. Said
buffer is required to be planted with one tree per 35 linear feet and shrubs,
lawn, or other vegetative ground cover. If NMH) will not allow trees within their
easement for the South Slough, the applicant may apply for Alternative Compliance
in accordance with UDC 11-513-5.
A 10-foot wide multi -use pathway and bridge over the South Slough shall be
provided on the site in accordance with the Parks Department conditions contained in
Exhibit B and the standards in the Master Pathways Plan and LTDC I I -3A-8.
With the first CZC application, include mitigation details for the 9 existing trees on
the site, consisting of 120 caliper inches, proposed to be removed, in compliance with
UDC I 1 -313-10. Contact Elroy Huff, City Arborist, 888-3579 for more details.
A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted with the CZC application per the
requirements on the CZC checklist, the conditions of approval noted in Exhibit B, in
accordance with the standards listed in UDC I 1 -313.
A detailed review of the final landscaping on this site will take place with the first
Certificate of Zoning Compliance(s) application for the parking areas on this site. The
aforementioned notes/revisions should be reflected on a revised plan submitted with the
CZC application.
Mitigation: The site plan depicts 9 existing trees, consisting of 120 caliper inches, on the site
that are proposed to be removed upon development of the property. Per UDC 11 -313- 10,
mitigation is required for all existing trees 4-inch caliper or greater removed form the site
with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of 100% replacement.
Staff recommends that the applicant comply with the mitigation standards listed in UDC 11 -
313-10C.
Multi -Use Pathway: The Parks Department has submitted the following analysis on the
multi -use pathway required on this site:
The Meridian Pathways Master Plan depicts a future public pathway along the north side
of the South Slough (aka Finch Lateral or Finch Creek), which crosses the canal near the
location of thefuture Pedestrian Bridge depicted on the site plan, continues south
through the subjectproperty and connects to the intersection ofRiver Valley Road and
Eagle Road.
With the recent annexation of the Meridian Town Centerproperty, we expect to have a
future pathway built in the proposed 60-acre park along the south side of the South
Slough, east of Alley's WaylRecords Drive. This willprovidefor anotherfuture pathway
connection point. To connect with thefuture pathway in 60-acre park site, we
recommend constructing the sidewalk along the north side ofRiver Valley Street as a 10-
foot, detached multi -use pathway.
A northlsouth public pathway connection through the project, in eemplianee with the
Pathiva.tv Master Plan, is also required between River Valley Street and the pedestrian
bridge. The applicant has agreed to make the connection, but has requested that this
connection be allowed to be 5feet wide (on the proposed sidewalks) instead of the
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 17
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
standard I Ofeet wide due to potential impacts to the project
standai4y 1 ted in f6DG 11 3A 8. Staff supports this request provided the applican
maintains the narrower pathway, si2n it for the public, and construct a 10-foot
north -south connection alon2 Ally's Way. (Please see conditions of approval in Exhibit
B.)
Ditches, Laterals, and Canals: The South Slough runs along the northern boundary of this
site. The Downey Sublateral runs along the southern boundary of the site. Per UDC 11 -3 A-6
all irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of any natural waterway, that intersect,
cross or lie within the area being subdivided shall be covered. The South Slough is a natural
waterway and will remain open; the Downey Lateral shall be covered. Per the
Comprehensive Plan, the South Slough should be improved andprotected with
development of this property.
Note: The structures depicted on the site plan along the southern boundary encroach
approximately 12feet within Nampa Meridian Irrigation District's easementfor the
Downey Sublateral. Staff spoke with Steve Earl, Mason & Stanfield, regarding this issue
and he stated that the lateral was going to be relocated 25feet to the south. If the lateral is
relocated, the structures would no longer he within the easement. At the time of CZC
application, the easement should have already been relocated, OR the structures shall he
relocated outside of the easement. The applicant should submit a letterfrom NMID prior to
the next Commission action on this project documenting that they are amenable to
relocating the lateral and easement. F-Hrther-, Sfaff is eeneer-ned thaf NAMD jvW not agej
tives j4MM their easement-, jvhieh jwuld ereate a stmet buffer j4M no trees along E-. River
14d1ey Road-. The qffUeant sh oHk4 addres-s-, at th e pmbhe heaping,� how land-seaping ;VW -be
installed aletW River VageyRoad-, in relation to a mloeated Downey Sublate if
will not allow landscaping (i.e. trees) within their easement for the Downey Sublateral and
if there is not sufficient room outside of the easement for the street buffer, the applican
shall provide an additional 5-foot wide strip for landscapin-- outside of the NMID
easement, PeE UDC 11-3B-7CIb;
Pressure Irrigation: The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be
supplied by a year-round source of water. The applicant should be required to use any
existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not
available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -
point connection is used, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for
the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. An underground,
pressurized irrigation system should be installed to all landscape areas per the approved
specifications and in accordance with LJDC 11-3A-15 and MCC 9-1-28.
Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC): Staff is requesting as a DA provision, that a
CZC application be submitted for approval of all parking and common areas on the site
prior to submittal of CZC's for structures on the site. Additionally, a Certificate of
Zoning Compliance is required prior to issuance of a building permit for any and all of the
proposed multi -family and/or commercial structures within this development. All structures
must substantially comply with the building elevations submitted with this application (see
Exhibit A), the architectural standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27E for multi -family
developments, and conditions of approval and DA provisions listed in Exhibit B of this
report. Additionally, any future structure(s) proposed on the commercial portion of the
development is required to comply with the design standards listed in LTDC 11-3A-19C for
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 18
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
structures located along entryway corridors. NOTE: A CZC application may include
multiplelall multi -family structures within the development.
Private Streets: The applicant is not proposing private streets within this development. For
addressing purposes, the Fire Department and Public Works is requesting that private
streets be provided within this development. The applicant shall submit a Private Street
application to the City prior to the next Commission meeting. Per LJDC 11-317-4, all private
streets shall be designed and constructed to the following standards:
A. Design standards:
I . Easement: The private street shall be constructed on a perpetual ingress/egress
easement or a single platted lot that provides access to all applicable properties.
2. Connection point: Where the point of connection of the private street is to a
public street, the private street shall be approved by the Transportation Authority.
3. Emergency vehicle: The private street shall provide sufficient maneuvering area
for emergency vehicles as determined and approved by the Meridian Fire
Department.
4. Gates: Gates or other obstacles shall not be allowed.
B. Construction standards:
1. For conversion of an existing facility to a private street at the direction of the Fire
Marshall:
a. All drive aisles shall be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed.
b. If a curb exists next to the drive aisle, it shall be painted red.
2. For all other private streets:
a. Roadway and storm drainage: The private street shall be constructed in
accord with the roadway and storm drainage standards of the Transportation
Authority or as approved by the City of Meridian based on plans submitted
by a certified engineer.
b. Street width: The private street shall be constructed within the easement and
shall have a travel lane width of twenty-four (24) feet or twenty-six (26) feet
as determined by the Fire Marshal relative to the height and size of the
proposed structures that adjoin the private street. Due to the height of the
proposed structures, the Fire Department is requiring a travel lane of 26
feet. 26feet is shown in ag areas ex-eepffor along the jowst boundary ofike
Site-, whieh is 25 feet-. The site plait shaU be revked to eomply ;4M th
. . I The site plan has been revised and appears to meet this
requirement; however, there is not a street width dimension depicted fo
Castle Way and Monarch Lane on the eastern Portion of the site. The
applicant shall comply with this requirement.
c. Sidewalks: A five-foot (5') attached sidewalk or four -foot (4') detached
sidewalk shall be provided on one side of the street in commercial districts.
This requirement may be waived if the applicant can demonstrate that an
alternative pedestrian path exists. Five-foot wide detached sidewalks are
proposed infront of the structures adjacent to parking.
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 19
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
d. Fire lanes: All drive aisles shall be posted as fire lanes with no parking
allowed. In addition, if a curb exists next to the drive aisle, it shall be painted
red.
3. Nlar-ianee (NIAR -08 001)1 The applieapA is r-e"esting appr-eval of a Var-ianee to UPC 11 314
4B that prohibits new aeeess peii4s to state highways, to allow a temper-ai=y aeeess to S
55/Eagle Read tipAil sueh time as E. River- Valley Read is eeastfue4ed. The pro
temper-afy aeeess is depieted on the site plan as a 26 feet wide asphalt read that will pr-evid
aeeess to4fem Eagle Read'S14 55 teiffem the nitilti 4eiily development. Staff has r-eviewe
the r-e"est and has deteFwAned that gfapAing a vaFianee would not be in the best iPAer-est of
City fer- the fellowing r-easans: 1) The pf:opeAy te the south on whieh E. River- Valley Read to
be eenstfueted, is euFFetAly in the develepmeR4 pfeeess. Staff expeets Ri,,,er- Valley Read to
be eenstmeted in the near- futtife upon develepmepA of that pfopei4y, mak4ng a temper-af�
aeeess to Eagle Read tianeeessafy. 2) Onee a tempo , . gr-apAed, and the r-ea
faee is improved, it's diffietilt for- the Gi4y to enfer-ee temaination of the use. 3) Gover-e
par-k4fig is shown en the site plan where the tempofafy aeeess r-Oad is proposed tE) eOfffieet tO
the multi fiHnily development; if the aeeess read is eonstfueted, 3 4 pafldng stalls will be lost-
4) The Cempr-eh sive Aan and Unified Develepmen4 Gode suppei4 1i
state highw&��
Additionally, in order- to aae, the City Cotineil is required to make the fellowin
findings (per- UPC 11 5B � 11-H-):
a. Thevar-ianee shall not gr-apA a r-i& or- speeial pr-ivilege that is not ethefwise allowed
in the di.tfiet;
b. Thevar-ianee r-elieves an up4ue har-dship beeause of ehar-aeter-isties of the sit
e. The var-ianee shall not be detfimefttal to the p4lie health, safety, and welfare-.
Staff has r-eviewed these findings and believes that gfa ae would allow a right e
speeial privilege that is not other -wise allowed fer- pf�opeAie:�. fl.4-at. Art--. adjaeepA to a st
high -way. Stag finds that gr-anting the subj eet var4anee weuN be detr-imen4a! to the publie
health, safety, or- welfare. While Staff rveegaizes that allowing a temper-ar-y a6eess peiPA to
the site ffem S14 55,'Eagle Read would pr-ovide aeeess to the site ttpAil sueh time as E. Rive
Valley Read is extended, Staff eanaet suppai4 aeeess points that would/may affeet the safet5
of the publie and 0h.-At. 1Q'_A the UPC standards. Fw4her-, Staff does not believe an un&-e
hardship exists beeause of ehar-aeter-isties of the site in whieh the City should gr-aFA a vaf4aflee.
St-agbelieves that E. River- Valley Read and Allys Way 1will he ex�.ded upen developme
of the pr-apei4y, whieh will pr-evide adequate Peeess to the subjeet pfepefty,
For these reasons, Staff r-eeommends that aeeess to the site be proAded from E. River
Valley Road and Allys Way and the Fequested vaFianee be denied. (Please see Exhibit D
Ai- a detailed anab,�sis of the requir-edfaets andfindingsfier a + * . -,,g Applican
withdrew request for temporary access at the Commission hearin,- on March 6, 2008.
Variance (VAR-08-002): The applicant is requesting approval of a Variance to LJDC Table
I I -3C-6 for a reduction in the number of parking spaces required for multi -family dwellings
in covered carports or garages. LJDC I I -3C-6 requires multi -family dwellings with I
bedroom to have 2 parking spaces per unit, 1 in a covered carport or garage. The site plan
shows 48 - bedroom units, which requires 48 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces.
Multi -family dwellings with more than I bedroom are required to have 2 parking spaces per
unit in a covered carport or garage. The site plan shows 15 6 units with more than I bedroom,
which requires 312 covered spaces. A total of 360 covered spaces and 48 uncovered spaces
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE20
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
are required on the site (408 total spaces required). The applicant has provided 2-95 299
covered spaces and 44-3 109 uncovered space (408 total spaces proposed). A variance is
requestedfor a reduction in the number of coveredparking spaces requiredfrom 360 spaces
to 29-5 299 spaces. The reason for the variance is that an 80-foot wide Nampa Meridian
Irrigation District (NMID) easement exists along the entire northern boundary of the site
where the South Slough is located. NMID does not allow permanent structures to be built
within their easement.
In order to grant a variance, the City Council is required to make the following findings (per
UDC 11-5134E):
a. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed
in the district;
b. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; and
c. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare.
Staff has reviewed these findings and while Staff does not believe that granting the requested
variance would be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare, Staff does find that
granting the subject variance would allow a right or special privilege that is not otherwise
allowed in the district for multi -family developments. Further, Staff does not believe an
undue hardship exists because of characteristics of the site in which the City should grant a
variance. Staff believes that a residential structure(s) could be removed and the site
redesigned in order to have additional room for the amount of UDC required covered
parking spaces.
For these reasons, Staff recommends that the requested variance for a reduction in the
number of covered parking spaces required be denied and the required parking be
provided on the site per UDC requirements. (Please see Exhibit D for a detailed analysis
of the requiredfacts andfindingsfor a variance request.)
b. Staff Recommendation: Staff is reconumending several sigpOicant ehanges to the site pL%n-,
parkAng plan, aeeess plan, and struetum location. For these reasons, and beeaus
eonnnents have not yet been reeeived from AC14D and 1TD, Staff is Fequesting that thi
ot be heard by the ComwAssion on IN-1—a-reh 604 but that the ConupAssion eontinues it -
until a later date to give the applicant time to make revisions to the site/landscape p!
and obtain ACHD conditions. Staff is generally supportive of the requested annexation &
zoning of 10.56 acres to R-40, but is not supportive o and the request for annexation & zoning
of 1.5 acres to C-C (see Analysis, Section 10, for more information). Further, staff is generally
supportive of the CUP for a multi -family development, but is not supportive of either- o the
requested Variance applications. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the subject AZ
and CUP applications and denial of the subject VAR application. See the Analysis in
Section 10 and the Findings in Exhibit D of the staff report.
The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items on March 6, and 20, 2008.
At the public hearing on March 20'h, they moved to recommend approval of the suboect A
and CUP request.
11. EXHIBITS
A. Drawings
1. Vicinity/Zoning Map
2. Site Plan (dated: 3/15,106 3/12/08)
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE 21
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
3. Landscape Plan (dated: 1/23�07 1/08)
4. Elevations for Building A
5. Elevations for Buildings B & C
6. Colored Elevations for Buildings B & C (24 unit structure)
7. Elevations for Buildings D, E, & F
8. Elevations for Buildings G & H
9. Elevations for Building I
10. Floor Plans of Multi -Family Units
11. Clubhouse Elevations & Floor Plan
12. Gazebo Elevations
13. Garage Buildings #1 & #7 - Elevations & Floor Plan
14. Garage Buildings #2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 - Elevations & Floor Plan
B. Comments/Conditions of Approval
I . Planning Department (DRAFT)
2. Public Works Department
3. Fire Department
4. Police Department
5. Parks Department
6. Sanitary Service Company
7.
8. 1dahe Tr-anspei4afien Depai4me
C. Legal Descriptions & Exhibit Maps
1. Proposed Annexation Area
2. Proposed R-40 Boundary
3. Proposed C-C Boundary
D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
Regency at River Valley (revised) PAGE22
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
A. Drawings
1. Vicinity/Zoning Map
RlC RIC
�B
Exhibit A
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
2. Site Plan (dated: 345i06 3/12/08)
APA-97.�AM-V' A r mfvw�,v vAt i,�v
P@Rwm :'Wazy 11ft sp� A
Hill
`41
L
9
nil
L
,,,,nTrTTTTTjTTrm i -LI
Exhibit A
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
3. Landscape Plan (dated: !Q3/07 1/08)
Ilk
ow
"Hills$
11W 31W ZT.
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
... .. .
Exhibit A
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
4. Elevations for Building A
11 E EILE-Tt I,
J EAT ELIE -TI I
LEGEND
TI ITELE -TIN
HE
law.
... . ...... m ...... ...
. . . .................
Ifni I M = WMEPIN _w-,
11 E ELIE _T1 I
V)
z
0
IN:
LU
Exhibit A
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
5. Elevations for Buildings B & C
11 E E� -TI I
71 fffl� -
Loa
J �f ELE -TI 1 11 E EU -1 k
0
Exhibit A
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
6. Colored Elevations for Buildings B & C (24 unit structure)
Exhibit A
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
9. Elevations for Building I
4,
Exhibit A
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
10. Floor Plans of Multi-Farnily Units
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [--- .......................................
—71
3 BEDROOM PLAN
2 BEDROOM PLAN
----- - - - - - - - - -
ILE
EXECUTIVE
2 BEDR00 PLAN
1 BEDROOM PLAN
EXECUTIVE
1 BEDROOM PLAN
E.
Exhibit A
EXECUTIVE
2 BEDR00 PLAN
1 BEDROOM PLAN
EXECUTIVE
1 BEDROOM PLAN
E.
Exhibit A
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
11. Clubhouse Elevations & Floor Plan
.... ...... .. .. ...... ..... .. ...........
... ......... ............... . .
... ... .. . ...
FF 11
qj�jj
. .. ........
iX i.
gal
L:
ij I .. :I
I ... .. ... . ... .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . .. .. . .
me:
r-1h.1
!or
I
Exhibit A
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
12. Gazebo Elevations
. %hu-
PC* LEn ELE .71 1
4.
11 HTELE,Wt F1 #TELE Vi
m
Z
0
Exhibit A
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
13. Garage Buildings #1 & #7 - Elevations & Floor Plan
j - i rL I I L-1 e'
—7. �--j
11(� . m
LE17CU -T1 I
i I HI Eq -:n I
..... ....... .......
I E-� ELE -- I
�mms � .... .....
.... . ....
, mm,
-1 - E M F I L44
z
0
Z
Exhibit A
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
14. Garage Buildings #2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 - Elevations & Floor Plans
---- ------------------- ------ ------ ----- --- - - ----- - --
p p pp Wmpp p mp p p ............................. ....................... ..............
LEFT aE -Ti I ILKYAn't,
1� T 4.
F. T E I E F- T E T E
M ELU.0-4, F1 IT EUE -TI I
-1 - E FL I I L-1
4r---
Z
E
U)
z
2
LU
w
.4
01 W
z
(L
LU
z
is
Exhibit A
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
B. Geffmients Conditions of Approval
6S�Whas not ineluded Commenesfor fhe]po?Won 6f Ake ]property ]proposed to be zoned G CL as s
& not reeemmending approval of annexation 4thatpotwon of fheprqperl�v of this dme.-ff
Commission deeides to P-g-t-OMM-wo-d roval of saidportion of the annex-ation area, Staff j�M need
additional time to prep .. . . te Development,4greemeiitpro+isions-.)
1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT (DRAFT)
1.1 Annexation & Zoning Comments
1.1.1 The legal description submitted with the application (stamped on June 14, 2006 by Darin
Holzhey, PLS) is accurate and meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and Idaho State
Tax Connnission
1.1.2 The applicant's request for annexation and zoning of 10.56 acres to R-40 is approved. The
applicant's request for annexation and zoning of 1.5 acres to C-C is n,64 approved.
1.1.3 Prior to annexation ordinance approval, the applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement
with the City. Said Development Agreement shall be signed wid-iin 6 months of the City
Council's approval of this application. See section 10 above for analysis and comments regarding
the Planning Department recommended Development Agreement provisions.
1.2 Site Specific Requirements - Conditional Use Permit
1.2.1 The site plan, labeled as Sheet I of 1, prepared by Mason & Stanfield, Inc., stamped by Scott
Stanfield on 1,131,108 3/12/08, is ffe� approved with the conditions stated herein. At least 10 days
prior- to the next Plamiing & Zoning Cow.-nission hearing, submit 10 full size, one 9.5" x 11 " and
an eleetr-eaie eepy of a r-evised site plan that is eeasistepA with the eenditions listed herein. All
comments of the accompanying Annexation & Zoning (AZ-08-003) application shall also be
considered conditions of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP-08-004).
1.2.2 The landscape plan, prepared by Bach Homes, dated 1/08, is approved with the following
modifications/notes:
a. Per UDC Table I I -2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer is required along the future extension of
E. River Valley Road. If NMID will not allow landscaping (i.e. trees) within their easement
for the Downey Sublateral and if there is not sufficient room outside of the easement fo
the street buffer, the applicant shall provide an additional 5-foot wide strip for landscapine
outside of the NMID easement, per UDC 11-3B-7C]b;
b. Per UDC Table I I -2A-8, a 20-foot wide street buffer is required along Allys Way;
c. Per UDC Table I I -2A-8, a 3 5 -foot wide street buffer will be required along Eagle Road/SH
55, an entryway corridor (upon development of the commercial portion of the site when
annexed).
d. A 25-foot wide buffer shall be provided along the east side of the C-C zoned portion of
the site afflacent to the multi -family development, and along the south side of the C-C
zoned portion of the site IF a residence exists at the time of CZC submittal.
e. Per UDC 11-313-8C, a 5-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer is required afflacent to
parking and vehicular use areas along the north boundary of the site and adjacent to
the existing residence on the west boundary of the site. Said buffer is required to be
planted with one tree per 35 linear feet and shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative groun
cover.,
f. Include mitigation details for the 9 existing trees on the site, consisting of 120 caliper inches,
proposed to be removed, in compliance with UDC 11 -313- 10.
Exhibit B
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
g. Per UDC 11-4-3-27, all street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundation.
The foundation landscaping shall meet the following standards:
0 The landscaped area shall be at least 3-feet wide;
For every 3 linear feet of foundation, an evergreen shrub having a minimum mature
height of 24 inches shall be planted; and
0 Ground cover plants shall be planted in the remainder of the landscaped area.
h. A 10-foot wide multi -use pathway and bridge over the South Slough shall be provided on the
site in accordance with the Parks Department conditions contained below in Section 5, the
standards in the Master Pathways Plan, and UDC I I -3A-8.
Where the applicant has submitted a preliminary landscape plan and where staff has reviewed
such plan, the landscaping shall be consistent with the preliminary plan with modifications as
proposed by staff. The proceeding modifications and notes should be shown on a revised
landscape plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application(s).
1.2.3 A complete Private Street application for streets within this development shall be submitteo,
at least 10 days prior to the nex4 Planning & Z94ing (30144�004_911 ���Jgjm
Twenty-six foot wide private streets shall be constructed within this development in accordance
with the standards listed in UDC 11 -3F-4.
1.2.4 The applicant must either install wheel stops for all parking adjacent to sidewalks or landscaping
or the sidewalk or landscape area may be widened 2 feet to allow for vehicle overhang, and the
stall length may be reduced by 2 feet (from 19' to 17'), per UDC I I -3C-5B.
1.2.5 Bicycle parking is required to be provided on the site. Per UDC I I -3C-6G, I bicycle parking
space is required for every 25 proposed vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof
1.2.6 The applicant should submit a letter from Nampa Meridian Irrigation District pr-iff tO the
next Commission hearing documenting that they are amenable to relocating the Downey
Sublateral and easement that currently exists along the southern boundary of the site. If
NMID is not amenable to relocating the easement, the site plan shall be revised so that
structures are located outside of the easement. Additionally, if NMID nill not allow
landscaping (i.e. trees) within their easement and there is not sufficient room outside of the
easementfor the required street buffer along River Valley Road, an additional 5-foot wide strip
shall be providedfor street buffer landscaping.
1.2.8 The applieapA shall eamply with the eever-ed and uneever-ed paFking standards for- multi fiffijily
developments listed in UPC 11 3C 6 (the r-equested
1.2.10 The applicant shall dedicate right-of-way and construct Allys Way in accordance with ACHD
standards, in alignment with Allys Way north of the site, on the north side of Ustick Road. A *tub
str-ee driveway shall be constructed for emer2ency access only to/from the site to/from
Allys Way that meets the Fire Department's turning radius requirements stated below in
#3.3.
1.2.13 Per UDC I I -3A-6, all irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, and
waterways being used as amenities, that intersect, cross or lie within the area being subdivided
shall be covered. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or
lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non -approval submitted to the
Public Works Department prior to construction plan approval. If lateral users association approval
can not be obtained, alternate plans will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
Exhibit B
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
1.2.16 All signage for the site requires approval of a sign permit. All signage must comply with UDC
I I -3D-81 and 11 -3D- 10, Table 2, for subdivision identification signs.
1.2.17 An underground, pressurized irrigation system shall be installed to all landscape areas within the
development per the approved specifications and in accordance with UDC I I -3A- 15 and MCC 9-
1-28.
2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
2.1 Sanitary sewer service to this development is being proposed via extension of mains in North
Eagle Rd. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; the applicant shall
coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms
of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer
mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub -grade is less than three feet than alternate
materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard
Specifications.
2.2 Water service to this site is being proposed via extension of mains in N Eagle Road. The
applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate
main size and routing with Public Works.
2.3 The applicant shall provide a 20-foot common lot for all public water/sewer mains outside of
public right of way. The common lot shall be covered with a blanket easement to the City of
Meridian.
2.4 The applicant shall provide a 20-foot easement for all public water/sewer mains outside of public
right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easements shall not be dedicated via a
plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms.
Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description,
which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x I I" map with
bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and
dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD.
2.5 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round
source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or
well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point
connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized,
the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to
issuance of building permits.
2.6 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to issuance of building
permits.
2.7 All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or
lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC I I -3A-6.
Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association
(ditch owners), with written approval or non -approval submitted to the Public Works Department.
If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, alternate plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Meridian City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits.
2.8 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per
City Ordinance Section 9-14 and 94-8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at
(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non -domestic
purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources
Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190.
Exhibit B
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
2.9 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City
Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures
and inspections (208)375-5211.
2.10 Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed,
drainage lots constructed, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final
Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits.
2.11 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of I 10% will be required for all uncompleted
fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to
issuance of building permits
2.12 All development improvements, including but not limited to sewer, fencing, micro -paths,
pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining
certificates of occupancy.
2.13 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to issuance of building
permits
2.14 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act.
2.15 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting
that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
2.16 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
2.17 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC I I - I 2-3H.
2.18 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building
pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
2.19 The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of
3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom
elevation of the crawl spaces of the multifamily buildings is at least I -foot above.
2.20 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or
drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district
or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in
accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate
of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project.
2.21 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings
per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and
approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the
project.
2.22 One hundred watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights shall be required at locations designated by
the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical
locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are
determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light
contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior to
commencing installations.
3. FIRE DEPARTMENT
3.1 Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Fire Department and water
quality by the Meridian Water Department for bacteria testing.
Exhibit B
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
3.2 Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department.
a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 V2" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle.
b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it.
c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works specifications.
d. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on comers when spacing permits.
e. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'.
f. Fire hydrants shall be place 18" above finish grade.
g. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements of the lFC Section 509.5.
h. Show all proposed or existing hydrants for all new construction or additions to existing
buildings within 1,000 feet of the project.
3.3 All common driveways shall be straight or have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside and
shall have a clear driving surface which is 20' wide. The Fire Department has eoneer-ns a
the turning r-adins at the west side of the site. Further-, the tHFBiflg radius at the tefflpffa-r-y
aeeess doesn't meet eodei
3.4 Operational fire hydrants, temporary or permanent street signs and access roads with an all weather
surface are required before combustible construction is brought on site.
3.5 To increase emergency access to the site a minimum of two points of access will be required for any
portion of the project, which serves more than 50 homes. The two entrances should be separated
by no less than V2 the diagonal measurement of the full development. The applicant shall provide
a stub street to the property from Allys Way at the east boundary of the site. See fire code 503.1.2 for
multi -family developments over 200 units. The applicant has revised the site plan to include an
emerzency acc to AlIvs Way; however, in order for this to meet the aforementioned
requirement, a street connection needs to be provided either north to Ustick or throu,-h the
CenterCal proiect to Fairview.
3.6 Commercial and office occupancies will require a fire -flow consistent with the International Fire
Code to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed per Appendix D.
3.7 The fire department requests that any future signalization installed as the result of the
development of this project be equipped with Opticom Sensors to ensure a safe and efficient
response by fire and emergency medical service vehicles. This cost of this installation is to be
bome by the developer.
3.8 Maintain a separation of 5' from the building to the dumpster enclosure.
3.9 Provide a Knox box entry system for the complex prior to occupancy.
3.10 The first digit of the Apartment/Office Suite shall correspond to the floor level.
3.11 The Fire Dept. has concerns about the addressing of the existing house and the address being
visible from the street which the project is addressed off of. Please contact the Addressing
Specialist at 898-5500 to address this concern prior to the public hearing.
3.12 Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the
jurisdiction is more than 400 feet (122 in) from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as
measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on -site fire hydrants
and mains shall be provided where required by the code official. For buildings equipped
throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section
903.3. 1.1 or 903.3.1.2 the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183).
a. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 in).
Exhibit B
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
b. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in
accordance with Section 903.3. 1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183
in).
3.13 All R-2 occupancies with 3 or more units shall be required to be fire sprinklered.
3.14 There shall be a fire hydrant within 100' of all fire department connections.
3.15 Buildings over 30' in height are required to have access roads in accordance with The International
Fire Code Appendix D Section D105. The 261 wide roads shall be required to be a max of 301
from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The fire
sprinkler system is required to be upgraded to a NFPA 13; contact the Fire Department.
3.16 Emergency response routes and fire lanes shall not be allowed to have speed bumps.
3.17 Pool chemicals shall be stored in compliance with the International Fire Code.
3.18 Multi -Family and Commercial projects shall be required to provide additional 60" wide access
point to the building from the fire lane to allow for the movement of manual fire suppression
equipment and gurney operations. The unobstructed breaks in the parking stalls shall be provided
so that building access is provided in such a manner that the most remote part of a building can be
reached with a length of 150' fire hose as measured around the perimeter of the building from the
fire lane. Code complaint Handicap parking stalls may be included to assist meeting this
requirement. Contact the Meridian Fire Department for details per 1FC Section 504.1.
3.19 Private streets are required within the development for addressing purposes.
4. POLICE DEPARTMENT
4.1 The Police Department has no concerns related to the site design submitted with the application.
5. PARKS DEPARTMENT
5.1 Applicant shall construct the sidewalk along the north side of River Valley Street as a I 0-foot
wide, detaehed multi -use pathway. A detached Dathwa-y is strongly preferred, pendin
approval by ACHD and NMID. Applicant shall Ing
cover the cost of replacing the detached
pathway if necessary due to future irrigation facility maintenance..
5.2 Applicant shall construct a 10 feet wid
Rivef Valley -Stfeet and the I -destr-ian bFidge the sidewali alon2 the west side of Ally' s Way as
a 10-foot wide multi -use pathway,
5.3 Applicant shall construct a 5-foot wide minimum multi -use pathway through project,
connecting between River Vallev Street and the Pedestrian bridge. Applicant shall
maintain the 5-foot vath section and sign it for public access.
5.4 Applicant shall design a pedestrian crossing at the South Slough/Finch Lateral, secure necessary
permits from the irrigation district and City floodplain administrator, prepare cost estimates, and
provide funds in a trust for half the cost of constructing the crossing.
5.5 All pathway exe A as noted in these conditi ns of approval, shall be built to the minimum
standards published in the Comprehensive Parks'& Recreation System Plan, pgs. 3-2 through 3-4,
sections B and C.
5.6 An easement shall be provided for public access to and maintenance of the pathways. The City
will not assume maintenance of the pathway until it connects from one major arterial road to
another, unless otherwise agreed to by the Parks & Recreation Department.
6. SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
Exhibit B
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
... . ...............
The site plan has been revised to comply with SSC requirements.
7. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
As of the print date of this report, comments have not been receivedfrom A CHD on this
application.
Exhibit B
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
C. Legal Descriptions & Exhibit Maps
1. Proposed Annexation Area
MASON & STANFIELDy INC.
PROFESUONAL ENGLVEERS, L,4 ivD SuR vEyORS & pLAAWERS
314 RADiotA STRFX[
CALDWEIA, IDAHO 836(K
FOR: Bach Builders
JOB NO�: NV1205
DATE: April 18, 2(*6
REVISED ANNEXATION
PROPERTY DESCRYPTTON
DETERMINED By RECORD DATA
TELEPHONr: ON) 454-0256
F.Ax: (209) 494-0979
Email: dl'olzhey(Wmseng.uS
A Parcel of land being a portion of the SW 1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range I
East. Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho, as shown on that certain Record of
Survey No. 6638, recorded as Insnument No. 104124018 on Sept 28, 2004 in the Office of the
Recorder of Ada County. Idaho, by Anderson Survey Group, Inc. for Brian Weiss, more
Particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the NW comer of said SW 1/4 NW 1/4, (North 1/16 COMer Common 10 sections 4
and 5), said corner bears S. 000 36' 08" W., 2 distance of 1291.17 feet from the NW corner of said
Section 4;
Thence S. 000 36� 11" W,, a distance of 776.26 feet. (formerly South), along the westerly boundary
of said SW 1/4 NW 1/4 to the POINT OF BEGINNING,
Thence S. 89* 23'49" E., a distance of 70.00 feet, (formerly East), to a point on the easterly
boundary of that certain Warranty Deed recorded as Instrument No.95018434 in the Officc ofthe
Recorder of Ada County, Idaho, said point monumentcd with a found 5/8 inch diameter iron pin
marked "ASG PLS 7314";
Thence along the boundary of said Record of Survey No. 6638 the following courses and distances:
Thence continuing S. 89* 23' 49" E., a distance of 230.00 feet (formeyly East), to a found 5�8 inch
diameter iron pin marked "ASG PLS 7314";
Thence N. 000 36' 11 " E., a distance of 218.08 feet, (formerly Norlb 2 18.05 feet), to a point on the
southerly boumlary Of that certain -Deternfination of Heirs", Case No. SP IE 0300520M, recorded
as Instrument No. 104047079 in the Office of the Recorder of Ada County, Idaho, said point
witnessed S. 00* 36' 11" W., a distance of 40.00 feet with a found 5/8 inch diameter iron pin
marked "ASG PLS 7314";
Ilence continuing along the boundary of said Record of Survey No. 6638 and along the southerly
boundary, of said Instrument No. 104047079 the f011Owing courses and distances:
Thence N. 84' 26' 11" E., a distance of 17-43 feet (formerly N. 830 50'E.) to a point;
Exhibit C
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
MASON & STANFIXLD I*'-
PROFMIOML EAWNEEM; L4hV SV&njft3, A PLAAWW
Pfte 2 of 3
Bach Buildem Multi Farnily-NV 1205SurvcyVeg3js%RtviSed Annex,d�c
Thence S. 660 18' 49" E., a distance of 264.00 feet,(fOrmerly S. 660 WE), to a point, said point
referenced S. 450 26, 11" W., a distance of 30.00 feet w�ith a found 51 inch diameter iron pin
marked "ASO PLS 7314";
Thence S. 340 48' 49" E., a distance of 227.70 feet0ormerly S. 350 25'E.), to a point, said point
referenced S. 861144' 15" W., a distance of 11.50 fet-1 with a found 5/8 inch diameter iron pin
marked "ASG PLS 7314";
Thence S. 710 16' 49" E., a distance of 132.00 feet�00rmefly S. 710 55'E. ), to a found 5/8 inch
diameter iron pin marked -ASG PLS 7314";
Thence S. 850 33' 49" E., a distance of 174,90 feet,(foffnerly S. 86- 1 O'E.), to a fK)int, said point
referenced S. 270 42'2311 W., a distarim of 30,00 feet with a found 5/8 inch diameter iron pin
marked "ASO PLS 7314";
Thence S— 4V 43'49" E., a distance of 364.98 feet, (formerly S. 410 20'E., a distance of 366.30
feet), to a found 518 inch diameter iron pin marked "ASO PLS 7314",
Thence S. 7210 58'49" E., a distance of 99.29 feet0ormcrly S. 73' 35'E., a distance of 98.34 feet),
to a point on the castcrt boundary of said SW 1/4 NW 1/4, said point witnessed S. 000 40'48" W.,
a distance of 20.00 feet with a found 5/8 inch diameter iron pin marked "ASO PLS 7314";
Thence leaving the southerly boundary of said Instrulmni No. 104047079 and continuing along the
boundary of said Record of Survey No. 663 8, S. OV 40'48" W., a distance of 111.65 feetgormeriv
South a distance of If 2.86 feet), along the easterly boundary of said SW 1/4 NW 1/4 to the SE
comer of said SW 1/4 NW 1/4, (center west 1/16 comer), said comer monumented with a found
5/8 inch diameter iron pin marked "PAT PLS 4347";
Thence N. 89* 45 * 2 1 " W., a distance of 978.27 feet,(formerly West a distance of 979.24 feet),
along the southerly boundary of said SW 1/4 NW 1/4 to a found 5/8 inch diameter iron pin marked
"ASO PLS 7314" which bears S. 89' 45' 21" E., a distance of 350.00 feet from the SW comer of
said SW 1/4 NW 1/4,( 1/4 comer common to sections 4 and 5);
Thence N. 000 36' 11 - E., a distance of 180.00 feet, (formerly North), to a found 5/8 inch diameter
iron pin marked "ASG PLS 7314`1
Thence N. 890 45' 2 1 " W.. a distance of 49.86 feet,(formerly West), to a point on the easterly
boundary of that certain Warranty Deed recorded as Instrument No. 7741806 in the Office of the
Recorder of Ada County, Idaho, said point monumented with a found 5/8 inch diameter iron pin
marked "ASG PLS 7314";
Thence N. 00* 36' 11" E., a distance of 145.00 feet, (formerly North), along the easterly boundary
of said Instrument No. 7741806 to a point, said point witnessed S. 00" 36' 11 " W., a distance ()f
1 .00 foot with a found 518 inch diameter iron pin marked "ASO PLS 7314",
Exhibit C
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
MASON & StAN"ELD [11C.
'"It"MIONAL EAWINFrU L4AD SujrvFyoA & pL4Nftpj
Pap 3 of 3
Bach Builders, Multi Family-NV]205"SurveYlepls\Rcvised Ann".doc
Thence N. 891145'21" W., a distance of 230.14 feet,(fOrmerly West) along the northerly boundary
of said Instrumcnt No. 7741806 to a point on the easterly boundary of that said Warranty Deed
Instrument No. 95018434, said Point munumented %ith a found 518 inch diameter iron pin marked
"ASG PLS 7314";
Thence continuing N. 890 45' 21" W., a distance Of 70-00 feet, along the extension of said
northerly boundary to a Point on the westerly boundan'of said SW 114 NW 1/4;
Thence N. 00* 36' 11" E., a distance of 218.94 feet along the easterly boundary of said Warranty
Deed Instrument N0.95018434 to the POINT OF BEGYNNING.
This Parcel contains 12.06 acres more or less.
All according to the record of survev as rccx>rded in the Office of the Ada County Recorder.
SUBJECT TO: All existing rights of way and easements of record or implied appearing on the
above-deseribed parcel of land.
This Legal Description was written without the benefit of an actual boundary survey. The courses
shown hereon were prepared from that certain Record Of SurvcY for "6638'% Recorded as
Instrunient No. "104 124018" in the Office of the Recorder of Ada County, Idaho.
0
H
L
Exhibit C
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
32 1� 33 USTICK ROAD
NVA coew
SOCbW* V4
vE L#%E TAaF
17 4y BE f DST
� 23 -L 70m
S�V26.' *w 30,co
INS
L3 SW4Cj5-W
iO4V 11.50
4;tlq 14 S2 7'42'23'w 30,OD
Nag* 5*21'W
POW OF
REGNNt*
3C
:7
0,
0 9r
�Z-06 Acres,
27 W
14
satbaft 6/4 'T
IIAT LS 434r
R AL
SY7*
1,00 200
I
AN 25 M
SccNe.' !'�=2W
MERIDIAN PUBLIC
WORKS DEPT.
J
LEGEND
1
�;Cacleo po�l
CC
CL 9 3 6
FOLcic brms COP morkonont
0
� ovid 5/8 inch dKL �fcn On
PLS 73-14', �Apss
w/PICSSC coo 'AS;�
0 �D'l'
0tl`*fwiSe
noted
WC
Witness cornei
Reference rn-onam&7I
Proverty boLcdafy lx*
Low swv"vfs
sec"ton lr*
afpc),i c
PIS.
—7-7— 1 74
Exhibit C
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
2. Proposed C-C Boundary
ason Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors and Planners
In,. Ph (208) 454-0256 Fax (2G8� 454-0979
A- 314 Badiola St. Caldwell, ID 83605
gra n /49,
FOR: Bach Builders
JOB NO.: NV1205
DATE: June 8, 2006
ANNEXATION
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PARCEL1
e-mail: dholzhqy@mseng.us
A parcel of land being a portion of the SW 1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range I
East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho, as shown on that certain Record of
Survey No. 6638, recorded as Instrument No. 104124018 on Sept. 28, 2004 in the Office of the
Recorder of Ada County, Idaho, by Anderson Survey Group, Inc. for Brian Weiss, more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the SW comer of said SWI /4 NWI/4, (WI/4 comer of Section 4), said comer
monumented with a brass disk,
Thence N. 00' 36' 08" E. a distance of 543.94 feet along the westerly boundary of said SWI/4
NWI/4 to the POU14T OF BEGINNING,;
Thence S. 89' 23' 52" E. a distance of 70.00 feet perpendicular to said westerly boundary to a point
monurnented with a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin;
Thence continuing S. 890 23' 52" E. a distance of 230.00 feet to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin;
Thence S. 000 33' 54" W. a distance of 217.06 feet to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin;
Thence, N. 890 45' 231, W. a distance of 230.15 feet parallel with the southerly boundary of said
SWIA NWI/4 to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin;
Thence, N. 890 451 2311 W. a distance of 70.00 feet paraHel with the southerly
SWI/4 NWI/4 to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin; boundary of said
Thence N. 000 36' 11 " E a distance of 218.94 feet parallel with the westerly boundary of said
SWIA NWI/4 to the POINT OF BEGI[NNING.
This Parcel contains 1.50 acres more or less.
Also, this Parcel is subject to all easements and rights -Of -way If record or implied.
Exhibit C
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
9 MEM N -W-
4
POIN T OF
SEWING
PARCEL I
�i_LS 7314
_�A% LS 73j4
o
uj
uj
c�
Acres. r�:
Ptol>05ej
C -- C zoninol
L5 N89*4523"W
100,
ASG 11 ?3.1.4 -,30,15' So LS 7144 wc
L TA8LE
WAF0403 CM NCE
L3 I S
P�
ASG. L,S 73 4 A56 LS 7314
- ----------
45'23T
w V4 cll�gl
t, 7314
Exhibit C
BACH BUILDERS
PARCIL I RMWT
W)
_ imam
0�1 Ao
asc)*l r Law
,Wtanrlel I I- """.I
- — ---- . .....
BACH BUILDERS
PARCIL I RMWT
W)
_ imam
0�1 Ao
asc)*l r Law
,Wtanrlel I I- """.I
- — ---- . .....
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
3. Proposed R-40 Boundary
a5on Notessional Engineers. Land Surveyors and Planners
314 Badiola St, Caldwell, ID 83605
—Nt—a �n U, Inc- Ph (208) 454-0256 Fax (208) 454-0979
e-mail. dilh—u-11ha4men �,Lj�
PROPERTY DESCRIMON
PARCEL2
12-40
A parcel of land being a portion of the SW 1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range I
East, Boise Meridian, City Of Meridian, Ada County Idaho, as shown on that certain Record of
Survey No. 6638, recorded as Instrument No. 104124018 on Sept. 28, 2004 in the Office of the
Recorder of Ada County, Idaho, by Anderson Survey Group, Inc. for Brian Weiss, more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the, SW comer of said SWI/4 NWI/4, (W 1/4 comer of Section 4), said corner
monumented with a brass disk;
Thence S. 890 45' 23" E. a distance of 350.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, said point
monumented with a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin;
Thence N. 000 36' 08- E. a distance of 180.00 feet parallel with the westerly boundary of said SW
1/4 NW 1/4 to a found 518-inch diameter iron pin,
Thence N, 89* 45' 23" W. a distance of 49.86 feel paral lei Aith the southerly boundary ofsaid
SWI/4 NWI/4 to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin;
Thence N. 00' 36' 08" E. a distance of 145.00 feet parallel with the westerly boundary of said SW
1/4 NW 1/4 to a found 5/8-inch diarneter iron pin;
Thence N. 0(r 33' 54" E. a distance of 217.06 feet to a found 5/8-inch diameler iron pin;
Thence N. 00* 36' 08" E. a distance of 218.08 feet paranel with the westerly boundary of said SW
1/4 NW 1/4 to a point that fidis in the South Skn%h;
Thence along said South Slough the following cowses WW &qances;
Thence N. 840 26' 08" E. a distance of 17.43 feet to a point;
Thence S. 660 18' 5211 E. a distance of 264.00 feet to a point;
T'hencc S. 34' 48' 52" E a distance of 227.70 15cell to a poiM
Thence S. 71* 16' 52" E. a distance of 132.00 feet to a point;
Thence S. 85' 33' 52" E. a distance of 174.90 feet to a point;
The= S. 40' 43' 52" E. a distance of 364.98 fed to a point;
Exhibit C
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
MASON & STANHELD, 1Nc.
SUR VEYOXS, ENGINEERs A PLA NwEks
Page 2
Thence S. 720 58' 52- E. a distance of 99.25 feet to a point on the eWteT]V boundary of said SW 114
NW114;
Thence leaving said slaugh S. 000 37' 52' W. a distance of 111.66 fLvt along said easterly
boundary to the SE corner of said SWI/4 NWI A, said comer monumented with a found 5/8-inch
diameter iron pin,
Tbence N. 990 45' 23" W. a distance of 978.33 feet along the. southerly boundary of said S W 1/4
NW 1/4 to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
This Parcel contains 10.56 acres more or less.
Also, this Parcel is subject to all easements and rights -of -way of record or implied,
0
9366
C)
Exhibit C
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
1, 11 1
za.
4;A? vs
-- A.,
5c
*MAI
AIR
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
a.,w
Z7 -�w - - - a-;
1�! �JAL
By
BACH BUILDERS
JAN 25 20
PARCEL 2 EDG##Wr
WERIVIAN PUBLIC
WC-RKS DEPT
FAPOWW36 om ftf, WIN,
a5on t Larpd,&Fnwm - !� —, I I------
scAu. ALT.&
tanfic
.of
Exhibit C
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
I . Annexation & Zoning Findings:
Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full
investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant
an annexation and/or rezone, the Council shall make the following findings:
a. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive
plan;
The applicant is proposing to annex and zone the eastern 10.56 acre portion of the
property R-40 and the western 1.5 acre portion of the property adjacent to Eagle Road, C-
C. The Cominission finds that the proposed zoning map amendment complies with the
applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Hewevef, Staff does nat filid that
apmexatiBn of the 1.5 aer-e peftien to C G is appr-E)pr-iate at this (see Analysis, Section
10 of this report for more information). Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and
Goals, Section 8, of the Staff Report.
b. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed
district, specifically the purpose statement;
The Commission finds that future development of the residential portion of this property
will comply with the established regulations and purpose statement of the R-40 zone and
future development of the C-C Dortion will comply with the Purpose statement of
the commercial districts.
c. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety,
and welfare;
The Cominission finds that the proposed zoning map amendment will not be detrimental
to the public health, safety, or welfare. Staff recommends that the Commission and
Council rely on any oral or written testimony that may be provided when determining this
finding.
d. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of
services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City
including, but not limited to, school districts; and,
The Commission finds that the proposed zoning amendment should not result in any
adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any Political subdivision providing
services to this site.
e. The annexation is in the best of interest of the City (UDC 11-5B-3.E).
The Commission finds that the annexation of the 10.56 acre portion of this property
with an R-40 zoning designation and the 1.5 acre portion of this Property with a C-
C zoninz desienation is in the best interest of the City. Staff loes not feel that the 1.5
ner-e portion of the pro er-ty PFOPOsed to be zoned C C is in the best interest of t
Cib' at this tifne.
2. Conditional Use Permit Findings:
The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of
each proposed conditional use in terms of the following, and may approve a conditional
use permit if they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to
Exhibit D
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
establish:
a. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the
dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located.
The Commission finds that if the site is designed according to the conditions of approval
in Exhibit B, the site will be large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet
the dimensional and development regulations of the R-40 district and the multi -family
Specific Use Standards.
Note: The applicant is requesting a variance to the covered parking standards in UDC
11-3C-6 However, Staff believes that if a structure(s) is removed, the applicant will be
able to comply with the requiredparking standards.
b. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan
and in accord with the requirements of this Title.
The Commission finds that the proposed multi -family residential use in the proposed R-
40 zone will be harmonious with and meet the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
c. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with
other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character
of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential
character of the same area.
The Commission finds that the proposed multi -family development is compatible with
other uses in the general area and will not adversely change the character of the area.
d. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,
will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity.
The Commission finds that the proposed development should not adversely affect other
property in the vicinity if the applicant complies with all conditions of approval listed in
Exhibit B of this staff report and constructs all improvements and operates the use in
accordance with the UDC standards.
e. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection,
drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer.
The Commission finds that sanitary sewer, domestic water and irrigation can be made
available to the subject property. Please refer to comments prepared by the Public Works
Department, Fire Department and other agencies.
f That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities
and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community.
The Cominission finds that the applicant will pay to extend the sanitary sewer and water
mains into the site. No additional capital facility costs are expected from the City. The
applicant and/or future property owners will be required to pay highway impact fees.
g. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment
and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the
general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes,
glare or odors.
Exhibit D
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
The Commission finds that the proposed development will not involve uses that will
create nuisances that would be detrimental to the general welfare of the surrounding area.
Staff recognizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase with the approval of this
development; however, Staff does not believe that the amount generated will be
detrimental to the general welfare of the public.
h. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural,
scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
The Commission finds that the proposed development will not result in the destruction,
loss or damage of any natural feature(s) of major importance. Staff recommends that the
Corrunission and Council reference any public testimony that may be presented to
determine whether or not the proposed development may destroy or damage a natural or
scenic feature(s) of major importance of which staff is unaware.
vir—
s
�
try
...... .
.....
VMS
-Nfpr.
-R= M
'11111111111111111P
. ............
...
............
1 -1. "W11
1.01 1 ".
pill
Z
v
4. Variance (VAR-08-002) Findings:
a. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed
in the district;
Staff is not supportive of the request for a variance for a reduction in the number of
covered parking spaces required by UDC 11-3C-6 from 360 to 295. Further, Staff finds
that granting a variance as requested would grant a right or special privilege that is not
otherwise allowed in the district for multi-fan-tily uses.
Exhibit D
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF APRIL 22,2008
Staff firids that the Applicant can comply with the parking standards listed in UDC I I -
3C-6 and provide the full amount of covered parking on the site as required if a
structure(s) is removed from the site. (See Analysis, Section 10, for more information).
b. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site;
Staff believes there are no topographical limitations or other physical characteristics of
this lot which would prevent ftill compliance with UDC 11 -6C-313.4.
c. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare.
Staff finds that granting the variance should not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, and welfare.
Exhibit D