HomeMy WebLinkAboutMemo from PlanningProject: Bridgetower Crossing Office
Location: SWC of Linder and McMillan; 12.64 acres; existing zoning is R-4.
Applications: Rezone and Preliminary Plat
Highlights of Proposed Development: Non-residential Lots: 11; 12 buildings as shown on the
submitted concept plan.
Comprehensive Plan Designation: Office
DA: New Bridgetower Crossing Office DA
• The proposed office buildings shall be constructed with high quality materials, including
but not limited to: stucco, wood and brick, with substantial stone accents, four sided
architecture, highlighted main entrances, stamped decorative concrete, composite or the
roofing material, variations in colors, roof planes and parapet heights.
• Elevations shall substantially conform to the photos.
• Development of the property shall generally comply, as determined by the Planning
Director, with the conceptual site plans submitted with MI-07-014. A minimum of 8
buildings with no one building exceeding 15,000 square feet shall be constructed on lots
associated with the Bridgetower Crossing Office Subdivision. The maximum allowable
non-residential square footage for this development shall be 137,650 square feet.
• The development of the site shall generally conform to the concept plan.
Elevations: Yes
Commission Recommendation: approval at their January 3, 2008 public hearing.
Summary of Commission Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Chuck Christensen (Applicant's Representative)
ii. In opposition: None
iii. Commenting: None
iv. Written testimony: None
Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission:
v. Tiling the Settler's Canal along the northern property boundary.
vi. Limiting the number of access points on Linder Road.
Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: The portion of the Settler's Canal along
McMillan Road and west of Villagio Way is not expected to be tiled.
Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: In the Bridgetower Crossing DA modification section it
reads remove those properties in Exhibit C (pages 9-14); it should read (pages 7-14).
Notes:
2/26/2008
Pro„pect: Bridgetoiw,ey• Crossiug Commercial
Location: East side of 'Ten Mile Road and Approximately 400 feet South of McMillan Ro
7.37 acres (PP); existing zoning is C-G and R-4. ad,
Applications: Rezone and Preliminary Plat
Highlights of Proposed Development: 8 non-residential building lots and 1 other; 2 to 7 buildings
as shown on the submitted concept plans. g
Comprehensive Plan Designation: Commercial and Office
DA: New Bridgetower Crossing Commercial DA
• The proposed commercial and office buildings shall be constructed with high quality
materials, including but not limited to: stucco, wood and brick, with substantial stone
accents, four sided architecture, highlighted main entrances, stamped decorative concrete,
composite or tile roofing material, variations in colors, roof planes and parapet heights.
• Elevations shall substantially conform to the photos.
• A minimum of 4 buildings with no one building exceeding 33,725 square feet shall be
constructed on lots associated with the Bridgetower Crossing Commercial Subdivision.
The maximum allowable non-residential square footage for this development shall be
80,260 square feet.
• The development of the site shall generally conform to the concept plan.
Elevations: Yes
Commission Recommendation: approval at their January 3, 2008 public hearing.
Summary of Commission Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Chuck Christensen (Applicant's Representative)
ii. In opposition: None
Commenting: None
iv. Written testimony: None
Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission:
i. Forwarding the project to City Council without the ACHD Staff Report.
ii. The tiling of the White Drain along the southern boundary of the project.
The combination of concept plan 1 and 3 to allow the larger building pads north
Street and transition to smaller buildings south of Capri Street. of Capri
Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation:
i. Strike the middle sentence of Condition 2.2, requiring two mains to Locust Gr
ii. The concept plan recommended for approval is a combination of conce t 1 ove.
the south half of concept plan three as stated in the staff report. p p an one and
Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: The applicant is concerned about concept 1
recommended by P&Z; it competes with a project they are working on across then street. T
applicant prefers the concept plan that allows one larger tenant. Council needs to he
concept plan (or plans) should be included in the DA.
specify which
2/26/2008