Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCastlebrook Sub VAR 03-005! ~~~; .,"~ ~ CHD ~"' Susan S. EasOake 1st Vice President Dave Bivens, 2nd Uce Presitlenl David E. Wynkoop, Commisslener John S. Fmnden, Canmisslanar TO: Crestline Development C/O Kevin Amar 416 E. 1st Street Meridian, ID 83642 SUBJECT: MVAR03-005 Block Length Variance 4000 W. Pine Avenue Apri14, 2003 RECEIVED APR _ 7 1.003 City of Meridian City Clerk Office On January 15, 2003, the Ada County Highway District Commissioners acted on MPP02-032/Castlebrook #2 Subdivision. The conditions and requirements also apply to MVAR03-005. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office at (208) 387-6170. 'ncere , raig od Senior Development Analyst Planning & Development Cc: Planning & Development/Chron/Project File Planning & Development Services City of Meridian Construction Services Drainage/Utilities Land Consultants, C/O Shawn Nickel, 52 N. 2nd Street, Eagle, ID 83616 Great Oaks Water Company, Inc., 6854 W. Wright Street, Boise, ID 83709 Ada County Highway District Ada County Highway District Planning Review Division This application requires Commission action due to the size of the development. This ifem is scheduled to be on the consent agenda on January 15, 2003 at 12:00 noon. Tech Review for this item was held with the applicant on Friday January 3, 2003. Please refer to the attachment for request for reconsideration guidelines. Staff contact: Andrea N. Tuning, 208-387-6177, afuning@achd.ada.id.us File Numbers: Castlebrook #2 Subdivision/ MPP02-032/Sub #1507 Site address: 4000 West Pine Avenue Owner: Great Oaks Water Company, Inc. 6854 West Wright Street Boise, Idaho 83709 Applicant: Crestline Development Kevin Amar 416 East 151 Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Representative: Land Consultants Shawn Nickel 52 North 2nd Street Eagle, Idaho 83616 Application Information The applicant is requesting rezone, annexation, and preliminary plat approval fora 148-lot residential subdivision located on 39.05-acres. The parcel is currently zoned RUT and is proposed to be zoned R-8. The site is located on the north side of Pine Avenue between Ten Mile Road and Black Cat Road. Acreage: 39.05-acres Current Zoning: RUT Proposed Zoning: R-8 Proposed buildable lots: 148-lots Proposed common lots: 9-lots Vicinity Map A. Findings of Fact Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 1,480 additional vehicle trips per day (0 existing} based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. 2. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee rate that will be assessed based on the impact fee ordinance in effect at the time that a building permit is issued. 3. Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was not required with this application. 4. Site Information: The site is currently used for agricultural purposes. 5. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area: a. North: Fuller Park and Rod's Parkside Creek Subdivision b. South: Single Family residential home on 45.820-acres c. East: Single Family residential home on 8.042-acres d. West: Single-family residential subdivision (Castlebrook Subdivision) 6. Impacted Roadways Black Cat Road Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: Cherry Lane Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: Franklin Road Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: None Minor arterial North of Franklin Road was 2,686 on 4-24-02. Better than"C" 35 MPH None Principal arterial East of Black Cat Road was 6,634 on 7-31-01. West of Black Cat Road was 4,823 on 7-6-00. Better than "C" 35 MPH None Minor arterial East of Black Cat Road was 7,097 on 4-24-02 West of Black Cat Road was 5,934 on 4-24-02. Better than "C" 45 MPH 7. Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and- Near the Site Black Cat Road is improved with 24-feet of pavement (2-traffic lanes) with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. Cherry Larie is improved with 5-traffic lanes with cu jb, gutter and sidewalk. Franklin Road is improved with 24-feet of pavemenY~, (2-traffic lanes) with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. 2 ~ ~} 8. Existing Right-of-Way ', Black Cat Road right-of--way varies in width. Black Cat Road varies from 50-feet of right-of--way to 55- feet of right-of--way (25-feet from centerline). li Cherry Lane currently has 85-feet of right-of-way (40-feet from centerline). Franklin Road currently has 55-feet of right-of--way (30-feet from centerline). 9. Site History ~ The District has not previously reviewed an application for this site. 10. Five Year Work Program The District does not have any roadway improvements within this area that are scheduled withih the Five Year Work Program. ~, 11. Other Development in Area On September 25, 2002, the Commission approved Subdivision #1 was a proposed 120-lot residential s~ B. Findings for Consideration Right-of-way District policy 7204.4.1 states that right-of-way than 50-feet wide except in unusual cases. A i permitted. ok Subdivision #1. Castlebrook on 39.96-acres. for all streets and highways shall not be less way width less than 40-feet will not 6e 2. Roadway Offsets District policy 7204.11.6, requires local roadways to another local roadway (measured centerline to cent 3. or offset a minimum of 125-feet from District policy 7204.11.8, requires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from a residential collector roadway (measured centerline to', centerline). The applicant is proposing to construct one entrance'ito intersect EI Gato Street approximately 800- feet east of the west property line. This roadway location meets District policy and should be approved with this application. The remaining internal roadways meet District policy in regard to roadway offsets and should be approved with this application Street Sections i District policy 72-F1A, 7202.3.2 and 7202.3.5, requires that residential collectors be constructed as 36-foot street sections with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks with no front-on housing. The access restrictions for these street segments should be stated on the final plat. Unless othervvise noted, parking should be prohibited on these street segments. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. District policy 7204.4.2 states, "developments with any buildable lot that is less that 1.5-acres in size will typically provide streets having a minimum pavement width of 32-feet with curb, gutter and sidewalks. The total street width shall be 36-feet from back-of-curb fo back-of-curb. Variations of this 3 width may be allowed, depending on traffic volume: Concrete sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5-feet in feet or more in which case the sidewalk shall be a r District policy 7203.4.1 states that if a proposed de developer shall construct one half of the streets im plus an additional 12-feet of paved surface beyond developer shall dedicate additional right-of-way, if r of 5-feet in width unless they are separated from th sidewalk shall be a minimum of 4-feet in width. With Castlebrook Subdivision #1, the applicant con Black Cat Road at the half-mile. EI Gato Street wa Functional Street Classification System Map but w~ Collector Study. The JUB collector study has not y Commission. Due to the fact that the EI Gata Stree 2020 Functional Street Classification System Map, the JUB Collector study, and the conclusions from 1 Subdivision #1 indicated that the traffic volumes on residential collector, the District required the applica collector with a 36-foot street section with vertical c right-of--way. Due to the fact that this roadway was housing was restricted on this roadway and access forecast to be generated by the development. vidth unless they are separated from the curb 5- inimum of 4-feet in width. ;lopment abuts an unpaved street or streets, the ovements, including curb, gutter and sidewalk, ie centerline established for the street. The auired. Concrete sidewalks shall be a minimum curb by 5-feet or more in which case the rutted EI Gato Street (Pine Avenue) to intersect not identified as a collector roadway on the 2020 identified as a mid-mile collector within the JUB been finalized or adopted by the ACHD was not identified as a future collector on the e Commission had not adopted the findings of submitted traffic impact study for Castlebrook I Gato Street would be consistent with a t to construct EI Gato Street as a residential b, gutter and 5-foot sidewalk within 50-feet of ossified as a residential collector, front on :strictions were applied. The applicant is proposing to extend EI Gato Street at the southwest property line (at the mid mile). Due to the fact that the applicant is proposing to construct EI Gato Street on the south property line, the applicant should continue the street section that was previously approved with Castelbrook Subdivision #1. The applicant should construct EI Gato Street as one half of a 36-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk, plus 12-feet of additional pavement within 40- feet of right-of-way. The applicant should also restrict direct access to EI Gato Street. This restriction should be noted on the final plat. 4. The applicant is proposing to construct the rem curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk within Stub Streets District policy 7203.5.1 and 7205.5 requires stub stre~ to provide access to adjoining parcels. District policy temporary easement provided to the District at the en are greater than 150-feet in length with a sign at the t ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". roadways as 36-foot street sections with rolled ;t of right-of--way. s to provide intro-neighborhood circulation and Iso requires temporary turnarounds with a of stub streets that serve more than one lot, or minus of the roadway stating that; "THIS The applicant is proposing to extend Dover Street from the west property line approximately 540-feet north of the south property line. Dover Street (the stub) was approved by the District on September 25, 2002 as a part of Castlebrook Subdivision #2. Staff is supportive of the extension of Dover Street. The applicant is proposing to construct a stub street (Dover Street) to the east property line approximately 485-feet north of the south property line. This stub is anticipated to serve the 8.042- acre site that is located directly to the east of Castlebrook Subdivision #2. Staff is supportive of the location of this stub street. Due to the fact that Dover',Street is proposed to be less than 150-feet in 4 ~ ~ ~ 5. 6. depth and one-lot in depth, the applicant is not required to construct a temporary turnaround. The applicant should install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Knuckles District policy District policy 7202.7 and 7207.5 ai within a knuckle to be constructed with the island area of 100-square feet and designed to safely cl should maintain a minimum of a 29-foot street se by ACHD's Planning and Development staff. the local Fire District standards require an island ping a minimum of 4-feet wide with a minimum inel traffic. The roadway around the traffic island in. The design should be reviewed and approved The applicant is proposing to construct five knucl subdivision. Staff is supportive of the location of Turnarounds District policy 7205.2.1 requires turnarounds to be 45-feet. The applicant should also be required to I either side of any proposed center islands within tt constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a mii of right-of-way plus the additional width of the med The applicant is proposing to construct iwo turns The applicant should provide a minimum turning (without center islands) throughout the knuckles. instructed to provide a minimum turning radius of rvide a minimum of a 29-foot street section on turnarounds. The medians should be Hum of a 100-square foot area. Dedicate 54feet (without center islands) in the subdivision. of 45-feet. 7. Islands/Medians District policy 7202.7 and 7207.5 requires any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat should be owned 'and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. The applicant is proposing to construct two islands H applicant should provide a minimum of 21-feet from i roadways curb. Any proposed landscape islands/mE this plat should be owned and maintained by a homE required on the final plat. n the Carisbrooke Avenue right-of-way. The back of the islands curb to the back of the ns within the public right-of-way dedicated by Hers association. Notes of this should be 8. Surrounding Roadways Castlebrook Subdivision #2 is proposing to access the public roadway system through Castlebrook Subdivision #1. Castlebrook Subdivision #1 has not,completed the final platting process therefore Castlebrook Subdivision #2 does not have access ta'~ the public roadway system at this time. Due to the fact that Castlebrook Subdivision #1 has not dedicated right-of-way through the recordation of a final plat, Castlebrook Subdivision #2's preliminary plat should be approved contingent upon the right- of-way within Castlebrook Subdivision #1 being dedicated to the public and the roadways being constructed or a financial surety in place for the construction of the roadways prior to the signature of the final plat for Castlebrook Subdivision #2. g. Other Access EI Gato Street is a classified residential collector. Unless otherwise approved by the District, direct lot access to EI Gato Street should be prohibited. This should be noted on the final plat. 5 l I ) C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval Extend EI Gato Street at the southwest property line (at the mid mile), as proposed. Construct EI Gato Street as one half of a 36-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk, plus 12-feet of additional pavement within 40-feet of right-of-way. Direct access to EI Gato Street is restricted. This restriction shall be noted on the final plat. 2. Construct the remaining roadways as 36-foot street, sections with rolled curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk within 50-feet of right-of--way. i 3. Extend Dover Street from the west property line approximately 540-feet north of the south property line, as proposed. 4. Construct Dover Street as a stub street to the east property line approximately 485-feet north of the south property line, as proposed. Install a sign at th'e terminus of the roadway stating that, 'THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". I 5. ,Construct five knuckles (without center islands) throughout the subdivision, as proposed. 6. Construct iwo turnarounds (without center islands) in the subdivision, as proposed. Provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. 7. Construct two islands within Carisbrooke Avenue, a5 proposed. Provide a minimum of 21-feet from the back of the islands curb to the back of the roadway curb. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of--way dedicated by this plat shall be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this shall be required on the final plat. 8. Unless otherwise approved by the District, direct lot access to EI Gato Street shall be prohibited. This shall be noted on the final plat. ', 9. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. II D. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way. 2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. i 3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and side'walk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact ;Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 4. Utiliiy street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. 5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplemerits, Construction Services procedures and all 6 applicable ACRD Ordinances unless specifically w of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement 6. 7, 8. The applicant shall submit revised plans far staff other required permits), which incorporates any r herein. An engineer registered in the State il, prior to issuance of building permit (or design changes. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #195, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387- 6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. ', 10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this .application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the plann',ed use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. ', E. Conclusions of Law 'i 1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. ', 2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. ~, Attachments I'~ 1. Vicinity Map I 2. Site Plan ', 3. Reconsideration Guidelines 7 1 Castlebrook Subdivision #1 I YP ~ e ~- I l € z ' I Il e .a ~ i 0 f~~! ~ N e m . i _ _ < ! ~° 5 ; . i IA a gs ~4. i 3'~ ,. A ~g ~'~ SA~ iF .! O m Z P l ~ ' ~ p y 1 !! S ! 1 [ 1 ~~ ! ~ ! .~ ~&~ S ! ~~ a~ :~ i n ~ " ° ~ i S e ~ O z A s l;1~l ii~3 ° !s ~q ~~! 11!p s s 11 t 1 1 a ~lE ~lq ~F lP !l i tl ~ d ; i-Q ,,~ ~;;!y ~~ 6gSa@.~paa•il-sa tl. € a ~- ~6's 9.dg ~~.@4 e~'Y ~ Q seg.. $ 3°~; . a !~ si-~' _ d $~ i$ i@. e !~i• l l o m 1 5 tl l I fII I I I ~ l IJ J i ~ I OI ¢P g 'j 3~YfA a;:~¢g A°'~~=y:9 e 3 ~ iG ~~ q aa3a®e' z:?.f:5~ Il 11 - , y !p` 0 i~~~ ~ ~ ge g W e°ta II~ I f` { f r I i I g ~ ~ ~~ ~ fE €lie €2e% ~ S i , ~ l § iq ~ ~ Q I I II I I d l ~ ~ Al ~~ q~gi ~° a s~ I ~ i ~ ! ~~ o e ~ ~ ~ pa! ~ y gee Ssg3i pS F94l A gg ! $ l r ~~ ` ~ 5 "s ._ ~ , ~ ~I~ I, ~/ Zp aE 6 ~- ° i , ~€ ' ____ . h. ' 1. a ~ I -a 1 S 3 ~~ ~_ i ~_® ®al®j_ ®~ Oa. , , ~P~ 1 ~ ' p h~ °+n~1 / l ~ ; ie =®~ ~' I I®, i O! ~~®' O ;p. i I ~ Ail. .. . ' q ~ ® ! l SO . i y E l 'egg 3A4= a z a . < e 'is& O!9 3b• iter ~ . 1 F - ~ dl _ e '!® ®~ I ® !® 09 0~ -~+! v2 ~ p ~ ' 1 v ' a •° -'~ ) a ... .. .. 9® 092 !p '~'~ ~ ~ ' ~K ~• l i ~ ~ ~ 9] a ~ ~~O• .?.. iioa ~'4. oa.~ ~ /p ~ __ __ .-__ _____ .-__~ _ Kr__ _ R T __ T ~ = ~_- I @ I w~~? ~ .I ~ ~ l * ~ L ' n b` P ~ l _- Request forRecons Request for Reconsideration of Commission or any other person objecting to any final action reconsideration of that action, provided the requ requested to be reconsidered, an action whose i out, or an action that has created a contractual r of Commission Action m: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD staff by the Commission may request not for a reconsideration of an action previously ions have been partly and materially carried ship with third parties. a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by all Commissioners present, If a motion to reconsider is made and sec©nded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a certain time. ~ b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to bej placed on the agenda for that next scheduled regular Commission meeting. i c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error of fact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the meeting.. d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to ACHD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at which the matter is to be retumed. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides. e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action, interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the President of the Commission determines tol, be appropriate, and the Commission may take any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable. f. If a motion to reconsider passes, the appli nt may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover administrative costs, as established. by the Commission. 8 MAYOR Robot D. Cowie CITY' COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy deWeerd William L. M. Nary Cherie McCandless Keith Bird ~,~: i, - .. eri~icn .~ u„~itlt~ ``V.. ~~, l,', LEGAL DEPARTMENT (508)588.2399• Fuz 388-25UI PARKS & RECREATION (508 838-3579 •Fax 898-1501 PUBLIC WORKS f'-OR)898-5500 •Fax 887-I'_97 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (308) 887-2511 •Fax 887-1397 PLANNING AND ZONING 1'_08) 883-5533 •Fax 883-6853 WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: April 8, 2003 Transmittal Date: March 25, 2003 Hearing File No.: VAR 03-005 Request: Variance request to allow certain blocks to exce block lengths to be less than 500 foot minimum By: Crestline Development, LLC Location of Property or Project: 4000 W. Pine Avenue, el David Zaremba, P/Z (Ne vArt vtq FV) Jerry Centers, P/Z (NU VaR, vAC, FPI Leslie Mathes, P/Z (NOVARVAC,FV) Michael Rohm, P/Z (NO VAR, VAC, FPJ Keith Borup, PIZ (NO VAR, VAC, FP) Robert Come, Mayor Bill Nary, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C edh Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service wa vaR, vac, FP) Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department RECEIVED MAR 3 1 1003 Date: April 15, 2003 Castlebrook Subdivision No. 2 Meridian School District (Nn FPJ Meridian Post Office rFwPP«,m Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian brig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Pawer Co. (FVmrony) 'T-U.S. West tFrirr«v» ' Intermountain Gas(FFrvvony~ ' Bureau of Reclamation (FPiPr«Nrl Idaho Transportation Department (NOFF~ Ada County rAZOr~ni Ada County Assess. Land Records (FP/PF «vy) Meridian Development Corporation Historical Preservation Commission Remarks: /5A~ ~.,~.L/- f~~ Iylorid City oPMerfdiaa City Clerk Office ~~ 33 EAST IDAHO • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 f'_OS) 888.4433 •Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208j'i 888-4218 Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 CENTRAL CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT .• DISTRICT Return to: C HEALTH Environmental Health Division ^Boise DEPARTMENT E.c E~;^ ;~{ ~D ^ Eagle 'Rezone # ~OSl~lt r~o~c N0 2 i.'"'M"A~VR+13J1 ~g~~ ^ ardenCity Meridian Conditional Use # er an Kuna Preliminary /Final /Short Plat CityCleri30ffice ^ACZ ~ d3 ~O6S !/~!/~//}NEE- c,PEsrZi "E' I~UF~Oor~s~/~~/ ^starr ~. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment conceming individual sewage disposal, we will require more data conceming the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics ^ or bedrockfrom original grade ^ other ^ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. ^ 8: After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ^ central sewage ^ communiiysewagesystem ^ communitywaterwell ^ interim sewage ^ central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ^ 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ^ central sewage ^ communiy sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ^ central water ^ 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ 11. This Department would recommend deferral urdil high seasonal ground water can be determined "rf other considerations indicate approval. ^ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ^ 14. Date: ~ / 4 Reviewed By: ~ Review Sheet CDHDB/OOlkc MAYOR Robert D Come CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy deWeerd William L. M. Nary Cherie McCandless Keith Bird ~~,i dy~ tip{` v{l, ~~ ~~,,~~ ,,~~'' ar.~ ,~, e]A V ~~ i9 ~.~Vl.eYlG~1G~YI ~~f t~, ~rl(~ ~,i i':. ;\ r ~. ~1_r4, 1'k_ .,L UN~~' SI~Ci - = ~aoa LEGAL DEPARTMENT (308) 268-2499 • Pax 284 35(11 PARKS & RECREATION (208 888 1579 •Fax 8985501 PUBLIC WORKS (208) 89R-Si00 •Fax 887-1297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887 2?I I •Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZON W G (208) 884-5533 • Pac 388-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO A N WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: April 8, 2003 Transmittal Date: March 25, 2003 Hearing Date: April 15, 2003 File No.: VAR 03-005 Request: Variance request to allow certain blocks to exceed 1,000 foot maximum length and certain block lengths to be less than 500 foot minimum for Castlebrook Subdivision No. 2 By: Crestline Development, LLC Location of Property or Project: 4000 W. Pine Avenue, e/o N. Black Cat Road, s/o W. Cherry Lane David Zaremba, P/Z Ma VAR, VAC, FP) Jerry Centers, P/Z (NO VAR, VAC, FP) Leslie Mathes, P/Z (NO VAR, VAC, FP) Michael Rohm, P/Z Ma VAR, VAC, FP) Keith Borup, P/Z tNavaR vac, FP) Robert Come, Mayor Bill Nary, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service rNo vAR, vac. FP) Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney Your C City Engineer City Planner Parks Department RECEIVED MAR 31 2003 City of Meridian City Clerk Office Meridian School District tNn FP) Meridian Post Office (FP/PP OMy9 Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP~PP nnlyq U.S. West tFPmPOaq~ Intermountain GasrFP~PP~ Bureau of Reclamation (FP~PP ONy) Idaho Transportation Department (Na FP) Ada County tAZO~ty) Ada County Assess. Land Records (FPiPP Dory) Meridian Development Cor ora ' Historical Pres~e i ~ Ion Remarks: K,cE~D t;I'""~' ~~ ~~a~~?d~~AN 33 EAST IDAHO • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208> 888-4433 •Fax (208) 887-4813 • City Clerk Ottice Fax (208) 888-4218 Human Resources Fax (208) 884-5723