Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecember 20, 2007 P&Z MinutesMeridian Planning & Zoning Commission December 20, 2007 Page 16 of 42 licant agrees that if the four mature trees are s Xt twoainch caliperlltreesgper app those four trees wit u e trees removed.) End of motion. each of the four mat Moe: Second. Council Rohm: It's been moved and seconde7-011 and PP 07 016, t I include the recommending approval of files number AZ 0 staff report with the aforementioned modifiicati a folkslfo hcoming Invor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. Thank yo MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 10: Continued Public Hearing from December 6, 2007: AZ 07-018 Item Request for Annexation and Zoning of 9.764 Seagle Three, LLC - C zone for Settler's Square Subdivision by 870 W. Ustick Road: Continued Public Hearing from Decembte e6~ialObuilding lot and Item 11 Plat with 12 com Request for a Preliminary 2 common lots on 9.764 acres in a propoLC 870zW Ust k Roads Square Subdivision by Seagle Three, L m: At this time I'd like to reopen the Public Hearing AZ 07-018 and PP 07- Roh 024 and begin with the staff report. Members of the Commission, the applications before Parsons: Mr. Chairman, toni ht are an annexation and zoning of 10.18 ss d strict and preliminary plat you 9 to community business C-C, but community busme val of 14 lots consisting of 12 commercial lots hw stwcomterof Ust ck and appro Setter's Square project. The site is located on the no Woodburn Subdivision, Venable Lane. The property is bordered on the north by d R-8. To south is the Crossfield North No. 4 da Countyn And to the east zone the west is a single family residence zoned RUT zoned C-N. A single family are the Cedar Springs commercial development, home and two outbuildings exist on the site ana wi'Icbe removed to make way or ant is requesting approval of the proposed commercial development. The pp s consisting of 12 commercial lots and two of atrvoi~ls' rov deh access land 14 lot , plat the applicant has depicted two public streets th here is north and south, interconnectivity for the pro s{see sda~ eto provide north-south access to Ustick east and west. The public oad and the residents to the north and east-nderdeve oped property to the R through the development and to the ciate the applicant has also submitted a west. In addition to the preliminary p Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission December 20, 2007 Page 17 of 42 be developed with a mix of retai , conceptual site plan of how this site may ues ersonal service shops, office uses, fina otal es of the bu' d ngsaare boutiq , p and a day care center. The total -- the square o g d to range in between 3,720 square feet and s5°uare feet r The concept expecte square footage at the build out Is estimated at 90,00 q roviding outdoor plan also illustrates the pedestrians theo roposed bui d ngs are pied together with seating areas for future patrons an p excellent pedestrian connectivity. decorative concrete pathways providing ' liar re uired parking is also located adjacent to tCe ofidthe developmentridSo, Sim q lined with trees that add to the pedestrian ambien ots. These are wider here is where they are pons toisg and rtelax onaa warm summers night. Here is pathways or areas for pat kind of some plaza areas that they are propoon9 eted and holwa t'sy nteraelated the decorative features of the stamped c rou hout the development up and down the pubais a r eearea f o the site se 21 th g Connects each building together. The total Ian p ercent open space the UDC percent, which is considerably more than the ten p 'res for residential subdivisions of equal size. If res onsible for constructing requi roved, the applicant shall be p zoning application is app 25 foot landscape buffer along Ustick Road and an 20 foot landscape bu er a is contiguous with the along Venable Lane. Where the commercial .property ' ential zoned property, the applicant shall provide a minimum of 25 foot resid Ilcant has been conditioned as such to meet these landscape buffer. The app 20, 25 along Ustick, 20 along Venable, landscape requirements. So, again, ntial roperties to the north and this is a singl the cioncep tplan, thereh st/a reside p going to require an additional 25 feet. As shown on Ilcant has otential for 11 buildings to be construct he n roposed development. The P submitted a conceptual streetscape for e tual streetscape reflects three different buildi f9 theitbuildingsashaleChavel conc p elements and accents. Each of the faca es o tantial lazing with brick accent and pilasters an levation details some of the subs 9 shade and sitting areas for future patrons. Another e 'tectural elements, some of the incorporated fla slain pand stu ~ of with brick archi from wood lap 9 design with building materials varying The largest of veneer pilasters adding articulation ba k heaeaand alsoeshown on here -- excuse the three buildings, which is in the e -- uses the same building materials, but featureame materiails as the build ng. m the size of the building and constructed with t e s ro riate Staff believes that the massing and scale Suth o~ °e of thesedb 9lding a evations to the development of this site. Staff is pp y with the and building materials and future building shown in these lelevationls. Staff is construction materials and design elements reliminary plat with recommending approval of the subject annexation and p Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission December 20, 2007 Page Y8 of 42 conditions stated in the staff report. This concludes my presentation. I .stand for any questions the Commission may have regarding the project. Rohm: Thank you, Bill. Any questions of staff? Moe: I have none. Siddoway: Just one for clarification. And I beliedrehitectu al articuhationuthat you that I'm clear, you did -- the requirement for the lication; is that correct? just described is part of the conditions for this app Parsons: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner Siddoway, yes, that's correct. Siddoway: Okay. Rohm: Thank you. Would the applicant like to come foreword, please. my name is Allen Christy. I'm a planner Christy: Good evening. For the record, with Treasure Valley Engineers. My work address is 1204 6th Street North, Nampa, Idaho. 83687. I'm working as a representative for the applicant and tonight we are just asking for recommendation of approval of the annexation, rezone, preliminary plat and alternative compliance. I agreeu st ons righffnowort and the Conditions provided in there and I will stand for any q Rohm: Boy, that's pretty simple. Moe: You're making it way too easy. Christy: I hope so. Rohm: Any questions for the applicant? Moe: Mr. Chairman, I just have one or it's probably more of a comment than I realize that's somewhat conceptual right there. Any concerns on the anything. -- our northeastern building there with a driveide? facing to where you'd e Y shining into the residents over there on the east s Newton-Huckabay: That's commercial. Moe: On the east side it? Rohm: That's a Chevron station. Moe: Well, forget that question, then. Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning Commission December 20, 2007 Page 1.9 of 42 Rudeen: I'm David Rudeen with Rudeen an off slt~s not reallyha dove thruilding that is depicting a child center, so that s a drop Moe: Works for me. Rudeen: Simple answer. Rohm: Very good. Thank you. Newton-Huckabay: Mr. Chair? .Rohm: Commissioner Newton-Huckabay. Newton-Huckabay: I have a question. Although I think that the proposed design and architecture is very very nice, it's substantially different than the architecture and look of the commercial development istoneland woodhand more of a ustic more of the stone -- what s the word . The look than a -- this type of look and I was wondering if something might be done to make it look a little more of a cohesive developments thoughll is very veryen ce a -- to me there is a very stark difference and Does anyone -- other Commissioners have concern there? Rohm: I hadn't even noticed. Newton-Huckabay: And, then, the other question I have is the public street that stubs to -- that comes out on Ustick to the south, th to Crossfield?ually line up with the Crossfield road. Does it line up to the entrance Christy: If my memory serves me correct, it does not line up. The road I believe you're talking about is further to the west. Newton-Huckabay: West. Christy: And that would have required -- Were to I ne ,up w'th thatproWe have enough to the west for us to get a road m the done some extensive work with ACRD to get the road location for the entrance where it's at now. Newton-Huckabay: I don't like where the road entrance is and you have got Venable, the entrance into the other one, and that one and, then, you're going to have another access to the south, but I guess I can't change that. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission December 20, 2007 Page 20 of 42 Christy: There is a condition placed on ACHD with the understanding that in the future that our access off of Ustick could be a right-in and right-out. Newton-Huckabay: Uh-huh. I missed that. I just have -- the only concern was just I think there was substantially different in look and architecture and I would kind of like to see them alittle -- I wouldn't necessarily recommend the whole rustic look, but maybe some stone or -- Moe: Just to kind of go with that, if you look at their site compared to the site you're speaking of right there, I think what you're going to see is that's -- this site is going to take over the look of that whole area right there. I don't think you're going to see it. It isn't going to be a noticeable. Newton-Huckabay: You don't think so? Moe: I don't think so. Newton-Huckabay:. Okay. Moe: I love this development. Newton-Huckabay: Well, yeah, I love the look. it's a very attractive development and I woul together, so -- if I have no support I won't push it. Rohm: Thank you. Any other questions? O'Brien: None from me. Siddoway: I have none. Like I said, I don't think -- I think d be interested to see it come Rohm: Thank you. At this time could Iget a -- there is nobody else that has signed up to testify to this application, but if anyone would like to come forward now is that time. Seeing none, could I get a motion to close the Public Hearing? O'Brien: So moved.. Newton-Huckabay: Second. Siddoway: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on AZ 07-018 and PP 07-024. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. Meridian Planning 8 Zoning Commission December 20, 2007 Page 21 of 42 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Moe: Mr. Chairman? Rohm: Commissioner Moe. Moe: After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to the City Council of file number AZ 07-018 and PP 07- 024 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of December 20th, 2007. No modifications. End of motion. Newton-Huckabay: Second. Siddoway: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to forward onto City Council recommending approval of AZ 07-018 and PP 07-024, to include all staff comments, with no modifications. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRLED: ALL AYES. Item 12: Public Hearing: RZ 07-020 Request for Rezone of 10.1 acres from R-4 to R-40 zoning district for Selway Apartments by Meridian Apartments, LLC -west of N. Goddard Creek Road and north of McMillan Road: Rohm: At this time I'd like to open RZ 07-020 for the Selway apartment project for the sole purpose of continuing this to the regularly scheduled meeting of February 7th, 2008. Moe: So moved. Siddoway: Second.. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to continue Item RZ 07-020 to the regularly scheduled meeting of February 7, 2008. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 13: Public Hearing: PFP 07-004 Request for Combined Preliminary / Final Plat approval of 3 residential lots on 0.59 of an acre located in