Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2001 01-16
CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, January 16, 2001, at 6:30 P.M. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: X Tammy de Weerd X Ron Anderson ~C- Cherie McCandless X Keith Bird X Mayor Robert Corrie 2. 3. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve Consent Agenda: A. Approve minutes of December 19, 2000, City Council Meeting: Approve B. Approve minutes of January 2, 2001, City Council Meeting: Approve C. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: VAR 00-023 Variance requesting to use Meridian City Water for irrigation in the Wanda's Meadow Subdivision by Robert Glenn -north of E. Ustick Road and west of N. Locust Grove Road: Approve D. Development Agreement: AZ 00-009 Request for annexation and zoning of 101.4 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Autumn Faire Subdivision by Gem Star Properties, LLC -southwest corner of Black Cat and Ustick Roads: Approve 4. Department Reports: A. Treasurer Department -Janice Smith: 1. 1999 / 2000 FY Audit Report: Presentation by Kevin Anderson B. Fire Department -Ken Bowers: 1. Change Order No. 1 for Ten Mice Fire Station: Approve Meridian City Council Agenda -January 18, 2000 Page 1 of 3 All materials presented at publc meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for dlsabilltl~ related to documerrts andlor hearings, please contact the City Clerks Offroe at 888-4433 ~ lest 48 hours prior to the public meeting. • C. Mayor's L~eparhrrent - Mayor Coale:' 1. Appointment of Parks and Recreation Commissioner: Approve David Moe 5. (Items moved from Consent Agenda) 6. Tabled from January 2, 2001: Swear in new Meridian City Police Officers: 4 new officers and 2 new reserve officers 7. Tabled from December 19, 2000: Ordinance No. Sign Ordinance: Tabled to February 6, 2001 8. Tabled from January 2, 2001: Ordinance No. :Land Swap between Steiner Development and the City of Meridian at The Lakes at Cherry Lane No. 8 Subdivision and Cherry Lane Golf Course: Tabled to February 6, 2001 9. Tabled from January 2, 2001: VAR 00-021 Request by Glenn Johnson Homes for a variance allowing aone-year time extension for the signing and recording of final plat for Hartford Subdivision -northeast corner of W. Ustick Road and N. Ten Mile Road: Tabled to February 6, 2001 10. Tabled from January 2, 2001: FP 00-018 Request for Final Plat approval for of 61 building lots and 3 other lots on 23.02 acres by Packard Estates Development for proposed Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2 - south of E. Ustick Road between N. Locust Grove Road and Wingate Lane: Approve with conditions 11. Ordinance No. 01-900: AZ 00-009 Request fior annexation and zoning of 101.4 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Autumn Faire Subdivision by Gem Stgr Properties, LLC -southwest corner of Black Cat and Ustick Roads: Approve 12. Tabled from January 2, 2001: FP 00-020 Final Plat approval of 47 building -lots and 3 other lots on 14.93 acres in an R-4 zone for Autumn Faire Subdivision No. 1 by Gem Star Properties, LLC -south of W. Ustick Road and west of N. Black Cat Road: Approve with conditions 13. Tabled from January 2, 2001: FP 00-025 Final Plat approval of 54 building lots and 8 other lots on 19.08 acres in an R-4 zone for Bridgetower Subdivision No. 1 by Primeland Development Co., LLP - north of W. Ustick Road and east of N. Ten Mile Road: Approve Meridian city Camcil Agenda -January 18, 2000 Page 2 of 3 All materials prbsented ffi public meetings shall become property of the city of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilitres mated to documents andlor hearings, ple~e contact the City Clerk's Office ffi 888.4433 ffi last 48 hours prior to the pubNc meeting. • 14. Ordinance No. 01-9Q1: RZ-00-006 Request for Rezone of 7.14 acres from I-L to C-G for the Meridian Business Park by Donald Asbell -East Franklin Road and North Baltic Place: Approve 15. Public Hearing: VAR 00-025 Variance of the lot width from 80 feet to approximately 79 feet for the four lots at the west side of Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 6 by Pinnacle Engineers -Ustick Road and North Linder Road: Attorney to Prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law 16. FP 00-026 Final Plat approval for 48 building lots and 3 other lots for Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 5 by Pinnacle Engineers -Ustick and North Linder Roads: Approve with conditions 17. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: Approve 18. Election of Officers: Keith Bird -President; Ron Anderson -Vice President 19. Executive Session 67-2345(e): Meridian City Council Agenda -January 16, 2000 Page 3 of 3 All materials preserrted at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accarrimodationfcr disabilities related to dacurnents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Ofr~e at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, January 16, 2001, at 6:30 P.M. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: X Tammy de Weerd X Ron Anderson X Cherie McCandless X Keith Bird X Mayor Robert Corrie 2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve minutes of December 19, 2000, City Council Meeting: Approve B. Approve minutes of January 2, 2001, City Council Meeting: Approve C. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: VAR 00-023 Variance requesting to use Meridian City Water for irrigation in the Wanda's Meadow Subdivision by Robert Glenn -north of E. Ustick Road and west of N. Locust Grove Road: Approve D. Development Agreement: AZ 00-009 Request for annexation and zoning of 101.4 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Autumn Faire Subdivision by Gem Star Properties, LLC -southwest corner of Black Cat and Ustick Roads: Approve 4. Department Reports: A. Treasurer Department -Janice Smith: 1999 / 2000 FY Audit Report: Presentation by Kevin Anderson B. Fire Department -Ken Bowers: 1. Change Order No. 1 for Ten Mile Fire Station: Approve Meridian City CouncilAgenda -January 1 B, 2000 Page 1 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall becbrne property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities r+~ated to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 88t3~1433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. ~ ~ C. Mayor's Department - Mayor Corrie: Appointment of Parks and Recreation Commissioner: Approve David Moe 5. (Items moved from Consent Agenda) 6. Tabled from January 2, 2001: Swear in new Meridian City Police Officers: 4 new officers and 2 new reserve officers 7. Tabled from December 19, 2000: Ordinance No. ~: Sign Ordinance: Tabled to February 6, 2001 8. Tabled from January 2, 2001: Ordinance No. Land Swap between Steiner Development and the City of Meridian at The Lakes at Cherry Lane No. 8 Subdivision and Cherry Lane golf Course: Tabled to February 6, 2001 9. Tabled from January 2, 2001: VAR 00-021 Request by Glenn Johnson Homes for a variance allowing aone-year time extension for the signing and recording of final plat for Hartford Subdivision -northeast corner of W. Ustick Road and N. Ten Mile Road: Tabled to February 6, 2001 10. Tabled from January 2, 2001: FP 00-018 Request for Final Plat approval for of 61 building lots and 3 other lots on 23.02 acres by Packard Estates Development for proposed Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2 - south of E. Ustick Road between N. Locust Grove Road and Wingate Lane: Approve with conditions 11. Ordinance No. 01-900: AZ 00-009 Request for annexation and zoning of 101.4 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Autumn Faire Subdivision by Gem Star Properties, LLC -southwest corner of Black Cat and Ustick Roads: Approve 12. Tabled from January 2, 2001: FP 00-020 Final Plat approval of 47 building lots and 3 other lots on 14.93 acres in an R-4 zone for Autumn Faire Subdivision No. 1 by Gem Star Properties, LLC -south of W. Ustick Road and west of N. Black Cat Road: Approve with conditions 13. Tabled from January 2, 2001: FP 00-025 Final Plat approval of 54 building lots and 8 other lots on 19.08 acres in an R-4 zone for Bridgetower Subdivision No. 1 by Primeland Development Co., LLP - north of W. Ustick Road and east of N. Ten Mile Road: Approve Meridian City CouncilAgenda -January 16, 2000 Page 2 of 3 All materials presented ffi public meetings shall became property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Off'~ce at 888-4433 at least 48 hairs prior to the public meting. • • 14. Ordinance No. 01-901: RZ-00-006 Request for Rezone of 7.14 acres from I-L to C-G for the Meridian Business Park by Donald Asbell -East Franklin Road and North Baltic Place: Approve 15. Public Hearing: VAR 00-025 Variance of the lot width from 80 feet to approximately 79 feet for the four lots at the west side of Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 6 by Pinnacle Engineers -Ustick Road and North Linder Road: Attorney to Prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law 16. FP 00-026 Final Plat approval for 48 building lots and 3 other lots for Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 5 by Pinnacle Engineers -Ustick and North Linder Roads: Approve with conditions 17. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: Approve 18. Election of Officers: Keith Bird - President President; Ron Anderson -Vice 19. Executive Session 67-2345(e): Meridian City CouncilAgenda -January 16, 2000 Page 3 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City ~ Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/ hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. • CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, January 16, 2001, at 6:30 P.M. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: Tammy de Weerd ~ Ron Anderson ~- Cherie M Landless ~- Keith Bird Mayor Robert Corrie 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve minutes of December 19, 2000, City Council Meeting: B. Approve minutes of January 2, 2001, City Council Meeting: ~~~rv v~- C. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: VAR 00-023 Variance requesting to use Meridian City Water for irrigation in the Wanda's Meadow Subdivision by Robert Glenn -north of E. Ustick Road and west of N. Locust Grove Road: ~1~ ~".~ D. Development Agreement: AZ 00-009 Request for annexation and zoning of 101.4 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Autumn Faire Subdivision by Gem Star Properties, LLC -southwest corner of Black Cat and Ustick Roads: - 4. Department Reports: A. Treasurer Department -Janice Smith: 1. 1999 / 2000 FY Audit Report - ~/r~sew~, h ~ ~~ /~e~-rte. ~~r~ B. Fire Department -Ken Bovtrors: 1. Change Order No. 1 for Ten Mile Fire Station C. Mayor's Department -Mayor Corrie: 1. Appointment of Park~and Recreation Commissioner: ~~r~/r~ vie zt,1,i7,c !'ho ~e. 5. (Items moved from Consent Agenda) ~~ Meridian City Council Agenda -January 16, 2000 Page 1 of 2 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for dis~ilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at I~st 48 hours prior to the public meeting. • • 6. Tabled from Janua~2, 2001: Swear in new Meridian City Police Officers: -~te~ o i~.c.I 2-kew ~,lervt o Zerf 7. Tabled from December 19, 2000: Ordinance No. Sign Ordinance: 8. Tabled from January 2, 2001: Ordinance No. Land Swap between Steiner Development and the City of Meridian at The Lakes at Cherry Lane No. 8 Subdivision and Cherry Lane Golf Course: ~rible. Gvr.~'L ,T~, 23~ ~~- 9. Tabled from January 2, 2001: VAR 00-021 Request by Glenn Johnson Homes for a variance allowing aone-year time extension for the signing and recording of final plat for Hartford Subdivision -northeast corner of W. Ustick Road and N. Ten Mile Road: ~,~/~ u.~.~ 1 Feh, 6~= 10. Tabled from January 2, 2001: FP 00-018 Request for Final Plat approval for of 61 building lots and 3 other lots on 23.02 acres by Packard Estates Development for proposed Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2 -south of E. Ustick Road between N. Locust Grove Road and Wingate Lane: 11. Ordinance No U - ®~ : AZ 00-009 Request for annexation and zoning of 101.4 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Autumn Faire Subdivision by Gem Star Properties, LLC -southwest corner of Black Cat and Ustick Roads: 12. Tabled from January 2, 2001: FP 00-020 Final Plat approval of 47 building lots and 3 other lots on 14.93 acres in an R-4 zone for Autumn Faire Subdivision No. 1 by Gem Star Properties, LLC -south of W. Ustick Road and west of N. Black Cat Road:~p~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~`,~.~ onr 13. Tabled from January 2, 2001: FP 00-025 Final Plat approval of 54 building lots and 8 other lots on 19.08 acres in an R-4 zone for Bridgetower Subdivision No. 1 by Primeland Development Co., LLP -north of W. Ustick Road and east of N. Ten Mile Road: ~ ru vt 14. Ordinance No. ~~ O RZ-00-006 Request for Rezone of 7.14 acres from I-L to C-G for the Meridian Business Park by Donald Asbell -East Franklin Road and North Baltic Place: G~pp'r~~-e-- 15. Public Hearing: VAR 00-025 Variance of the .lot width from 80 feet to approximately 79 feet for the four lots at the west side of Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 6 by Pinnacle Engineers -Ustick Road and North Linder Road: 16. FP 00-026 Final Piat approval for 48 building lots and 3 other lots for Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 5 by Pinnacle Engineers -Ustick and North Linder Roads: ~~-Uv2 w~~Go-n-~`3-cenr GL~rv vtie.~ Meridian City Council P~enda -Jan au ry 16, 2~ Ivry _ ~~ cL '~ «.~ i d e vc.~ Page 2 of 2 All materials presented ~ public me~ings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. /~ ~PC~>St•e SPSr~'~ 67-234-5-Ce) • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 16. 2001 The regularly scheduled City Council meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Council President Keith Bird at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, January 16, 2001. Members present: Keith Bird, Cherie McCandless, Tammy de Weerd, Ron Anderson. Members absent: Robert Corrie. Others present: Gary Smith, Bill Nichols, Ken Bowers, Shari Stiles, Bill Gordon, Janice Smith, Will Berg. Item 1. Roll-call Attendance: X Tammy de Weerd X Ron Anderson X Cherie McCandless X Keith Bird X Mayor Robert Corrie Bird: Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. I'll open up the City Council meeting for January 16, 2001, and welcome everybody here. City Clerk, would you call roll, please. Item 2. Adoption of the Agenda: Bird: Thank you. Council, on the agenda, we have one addition. It'll be Item 17, the water, sewer and trash delinquency notices, which was in your box tonight. With your approval, we'll adopt the agenda. De Weerd: Mr. President, I move that we adopt the agenda with -the change noted. McCandless: Second. Bird: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve minutes of December 19, 2000, City Council Meeting: B. Approve minutes of January 2, 2001, City Council Meeting: Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 2 • C. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: VAR 00-023 Variance requesting to use Meridian City Water for irrigation in the Wanda's Meadow Subdivision by Robert Glenn -north of E. Ustick Road and west of N. Locust Grove Road: D. Development Agreement: AZ 00-009 Request for annexation and zoning of 101.4 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Autumn Faire Subdivision by Gem Star Properties, LLC -southwest corner of Black Cat and Ustick Roads: Bird: Consent Agenda what's your pleasure? Anderson: Mr. President, I would make a motion that we approve the Consent Agenda Items. McCandless: Second. Bird: It's been moved and seconded to approve the Consent Agenda. Roll-call vote, Mr. Clerk. Roll-Call: Bird, aye; de Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 4. Department Reports: A. Treasurer Department -Janice Smith: 1. 1999 / 2000 FY Audit Report: Bird: Department Reports, Treasurer's Department, and Janice Smith. Smith: Thank you, Council members. For the agenda that I have tonight is to present the Council with our financial auditor report prepared by Balukoff, Lindstrom & Co., P.A. Kevin Anderson is with the firm and is here to present it to the Council. Bird: Thank you. Kevin Anderson: Mr. President and members of the City Council, my name is Kevin Anderson; I'm with the firm of Balukoff, Lindstrom & Co. As Janice Smith stated, our firm performed the audit of the financial statements for the City of Meridian for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000. I believe most of you got a copy of that audit, and I just want to point out a few highlights. I'm available and told Janice Smith that I would be available for come back for a workshop to go into more details. I'll just go into a few highlights tonight for just a few Meridian City Council Meeting January 16; 2001 Page 3 • minutes. The scope of our engagement was to do an audit of the financial statement. An objective of an audit is to provide reasonable insurance that the numbers, the amounts in the financial statements are fairly stated in material respects. We also perform procedures to perform and be in compliance with laws and regulations that might have a material impact on financial statements. It's with our audit that we consider the City of Meridian's internal control over financial reporting to determine what our audit procedures would be. The results of the audit on Pages 1 and 2 show that the City received an unqualified opinion on the financial statements which in (inaudible) is the best you can get. So it's - unqualified opinion, the financial statements are fairly stated. We also issued a report on compliance with the laws and regulations as it relates to our audit. I'm not saying that we do a complete verification of that. That would be virtually impossible for an audit firm to do, but to the extent that it would affect the financial statements, we have reviewed the compliance with the laws and regulations, and that report is found on Page 33 on the financial statements. That report shows no instances of non-compliance, which we were able to determine during our audit. We also issued a management letter on the City's accounting, and I will say that I think from the last year when we also issued that management letter, the accounting system has improved significantly. Many of those items were addressed and taken care of that we had noted in our previous audit. So I think there has been significant improvement there. We had no disagreements with management applying any accounting principles, to the financial statements or to any transactions, and we had no difficulties during the audit. Some of the highlights of the audit just to -expenditures were less than budgeted amounts, which is required by State Law. Your General Fund balance is at 10.7 million dollars at the end of September 30, 2000, the end of the fiscal year 2000. Those were - I would consider those to be highlights of the audit. I'm available to come back and schedule that to come back and go into the audit in more detail. If there are any questions, I'll entertain those now. Bird: Any questions? Anderson: I just had one. Accounting practices, are the rules going to be changing in the next couple years for cities of our size? Kevin Anderson: Yes. There is an accounting standards body that sets standards for governments. That standard-setting body is called the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, and they issue statements that we follow in terms of reporting and accounting for municipalities. The GASB, as we call them, issued a statement that will affect how the financial statements are presented. I'm not sure that it really affects how the accounting is done; cash is cash, checks are disbursements, and receipts are deposits. It will affect how the statements look and some of the things that we are required to present there.. That is effective, I'll double-check in a couple of years, Councilman Anderson. It will change some of the way the financial statements look. There's also a requirement in that Standard that requires the City to determine values for - Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 4 C you've got most of your fixed assets on, but what we call infrastructure. For the City of Meridian probably will include streetlights and most of your sewer lines, but I don't think (inaudible) on that. The reason I say that is because Ada County Highway District infrastructure is roads and bridges, so you can imagine what they have to go through in terms of what costs and so forth in order to put that number or amount on the ballot sheet of the (inaudible). I don't think that it will have a significant impact on that; although, we're still kind of working through that in trying to determine what the impact would be. We're still in the learning process of that, too, so there could be some (inaudible) on that. Bird: Kevin is it time - (inaudible) get programs to get started toward that area, spreadsheets or anything? Kevin Anderson: I don't know about that. I don't think so yet. That's going to be something we'll need to work - I don't think it will be something we'll need to work on this fiscal year. As far as next fiscal year, possibly. I don't think so. Bird: It's going to impact our budget, we'll need to get it for the next fiscal year. Kevin Anderson: You know, I really think it's more in how amounts are grouped. I don't know how the program will need to change or whatever; it's just how it's presented in the financial statements. I don't think it will require a new software program like the one you just went through. It might require some spreadsheets or whatever (inaudible) but I don't think it will get -off the top of my head, require a significant budget outlay to do that. What I'll do is between now and the workshop I'll see what I can do to consider some of those things that might be - give you a better answer then. Bird: Any other questions? Thank you, Mr. Anderson, and thanks again for the quick, nice report. De Weerd: Mr. President, (inaudible) can work with (inaudible) Bird: We'll put it on the second Tuesday if that's okay with Kevin. That's our workshop day, the 13t". Thank you. Janice, do you have anything else? Thank you, Janice. Okay. B. Fire Department -Ken Bowers: 1. Change Order No. 1 for Ten Mile Fire Station: Bird: Fire Department. Bowers: Good evening. Tonight I brought before you a Change Order on Fire Station No. 2, Ten Mile Road. I'll give you a little bit of history on this. When KJ started working in the area of our phase that we housed the equipment, they ran Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 5 • into a lot of clay in the ground that they had not anticipated. They figured they were going to be able to hit good dirt going down a foot, foot and a half. As they got down there, they got down into the clay. What happens is you have your regular dirt on top, and you have your clay between there. When we wash the trucks or when it rains, the water cannot penetrate that clay. They had put a Change Order to start moving the dirt out of the fire station bay area. There was a little bit of miscommunication with KJ, the contractor. The owner had told his foreman, Dale, that he had signed the Change Order. Dale thought in his own mind that the whole -everybody had signed it and proceeded in taking out the dirt and the clay before we had authorized it. When I got the Change Order in the mail, I had a little heartburn there; my eyes got a little big. It came it at $20,200. I knew we were going to have to have a meeting, and I knew the Mayor and you were going to have to approve that. So I got a hold of Ron, and I've gotten a hold of ZGA's Tom Zabala, and told him that we needed to have a meeting ASAP, as soon as possible. At that time Dale shut down the work of hauling out the dirt and bringing more dirt in. We had the meeting with Jack and discussed the miscommunications, and do we have any other ways of doing this? $20,000 is quite a bit of money. Jack was mentioning that when you drive down a road that is under construction and you see this black, plastic mesh pulled up on the side of the road. They could have put that mesh down between the dirt and the clay and it would have run the water off at that time. So Ron had mentioned that since they had not pulled all the dirt up on the west side, let's go ahead and have the fabric on the west side of the property. Jack, realizing that this was a miscommunication with his company, in good faith, said that he would do that for no cost whatsoever. He would fix the west side of the property at no cost. So that brought the price down of the change order to $16,000. At that time, Councilman Ron Anderson, myself and ZGA thought that was probably the best situation we could do at that time since the dirt and clay had already been hauled out. Are there any questions from you guys on this? Bird: Council, any questions for Bowers. If not we'll - Bowers: At this time I would like to -can you sign this acting Mayor Keith Bird? Do I have to wait till the Mayor - is he gone for awhile? Bird: -- I can sign it. Anderson: Mr. President, I would make a motion that we approve Change Order No. 1 for the Ten Mile Fire Station in the amount of $16,020 for KJ Corporation. McCandless: Second. Bird: Been moved and seconded for Proposal Request No. 2, Change Order No. 1 for the amount of $16,020. Any discussion? If not all in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Meridian City Council Meeting ~ • January 16, 2001 Page 6 C. Mayor's Department -Mayor Corrie: 1. Appointment of Parks and Recreation Commissioner: Bird: The next one is the Appointment for the Parks and Recreation Commissioner, we're missing one. I've got a letter from Mr. Mayor Corrie and he would like to extend the Appointment of Mr. David Moe to a second term on the Parks and Recreation Commission Board for the Council's approval. With that I would entertain a motion unless you - to approve or deny., De Weerd: Mr. President, I move that we accept the Re-appointment of Mr. David Moe for another three-year term on the Parks and Recreation Commission. Anderson: Second it. Bird: Been moved and seconded to Appoint Mr. David Moe to the Parks and Recreation Commission for athree-year term. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Bird: The next thing on the agenda for - De Weerd: Mr. President, before you move on, David Moe just completed his second term as President of the Parks and Recreation Commission. I would hope that maybe the City, perhaps you, could write him a letter thanking him for his work as President. Bird: It will be taken care of. Why don't you draft one and give it to Will, he can write it and we'll all sign it. Give that to Will. Item 6. Tabled from January 2, 2001: Swear in new, Meridian City Police Officers: Bird: Chief do you want to get your officers in here and I'll - I have the honor of getting the swearing in. Gordon: Acting Mayor Bird, City Council, I would like to present the three new Police Officers and ask Councilman Bird or acting Mayor Bird to swear them in. Could I have Cindy Robinson up here please, Mark Taylor and Stacy Arnold? Bird: Repeat after me. Gordon: Evidently we were a little late in getting the notification to the Reserve Officers. I would like to have Kevin Field up here and Scott Goggins. These Meridian City Council Meetin~ January 16, 2001 Page 6 C. Mayor's Department -Mayor Corrie: 1. Appointment of Parks and Recreation Commissioner: Bird: The next one is the Appointment for the Parks and Recreation Commissioner, we're missing one. I've got a letter from Mr. Mayor Corrie and he would like to extend the Appointment of Mr. David Moe to a second term on the Parks and Recreation Commission Board for the Council's approval. With that I would entertain a motion unless you - to approve or deny. De Weerd: Mr. President, I move that we accept the Re-appointment of Mr. David Moe for another three-year term on the Parks and Recreation Commission. Anderson: Second it. Bird: Been moved and seconded to Appoint Mr. David Moe. to the Parks and Recreation Commission for athree-year term. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Bird: The next thing an.the agenda for - De Weerd: Mr. President, before you move on, David Moe just completed his second term as President of the Parks and Recreation Commission. I would hope that maybe the City, perhaps you, could write him a letter thanking him for his work as President. Bird: It will be taken care of. Why don't you draft one and give it to Will, he can write it and we'll all sign it. Give that to Will. Item 6. Tabled from January 2, 2001: Swear in new Meridian City Police Officers: Bird: Chief do you want to get your officers in here and I'll - I have the honor of getting the swearing in. Gordon: Acting Mayor Bird, City Council, I would like to present the three new Police Officers and ask Councilman Bird or acting Mayor Bird to swear them in. Could I have Cindy Robinson up here please, Mark Taylor and Stacy Arnold? Bird: Repeat after me. Gordon: Evidently we were a little late in getting the notification to the Reserve Officers. I would like to have Kevin Field up here and Scott Goggins. These Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 7 • gentlemen do all of the police work that the officers do except for they're volunteers. We don't have to pay these guys. De Weerd: That makes you even more important. Anderson: Kevin you would think you would learn after all of these years. Field: It makes it even better. Gordon: Kevin is also involved in our Explorer Troop too. (Three Police Officers and two Reserve Police Officers sworn in.) Item 7. Tabled from December 19, 2000: Ordinance No. Sign Ordinance: Bird: Item No. 7 is tabled from December 19, 2000, the Sign Ordinance. I don't believe it's ready yet. Nichols: Mr. President, members of the Council, the Planning and Zoning Department's been waiting on some graphics to be able to insert into the Ordinance for better explanation on Signs. Those were anticipated to be here I think last Friday but they didn't get in, in time. We'll need to table this. I would recommend, the first meeting in February Shari? Stiles: Yes, probably to be safe. Bird: Council what's your pleasure? De Weerd: Mr. President, I move that we table the Sign Ordinance to February 6, 2001. Anderson: Second. Bird: Any discussion? Hearing none, all in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 8. Tabled from January 2, 2001: Ordinance No. Land Swap between Steiner Development and the City of Meridian at The Lakes at Cherry Lane No. 8 Subdivision and Cherry Lane Golf Course: Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 8 Bird: Item 8, is the Ordinance for the Land Swap between Steiner Development and the City of Meridian at The Lakes at Cherry Lane No. 8 Subdivision and Cherry Lane Golf Course. De Weerd: Mr. President, I would like to excuse myself from this. Bird: You may. Council the agreement was just received by Cherry Lane Golf Recreation Incorporated. With your approval they would like to delay this, table this until the next meeting which is the 23`a. Mr. Nichols do you have anything to add to that? Nichols: No Mr. President, I think this doesn't violate our new Ordinance. This would be okay on the 23ra. This is the kind of thing we can take up on the 23`a Anderson: Mr. President, I would make a motion then that we table this until - did you say this wouldn't qualify for a land (inaudible)? Bird: No, it would. It would be okay - we could (sic) do it the 23`a he said. Anderson: I would make a motion that we table it until the Council meeting on January 23, 2001. McCandless: Second. Bird: Move and second the Ordinance for Land Swap between Steiner Development and City of Meridian to January 23, 2001. Any discussion? Hearing none, all in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSTAINED Item 9. Tabled from January 2, 2001: VAR 00-021 Request by Glenn Johnson Homes for a variance allowing aone-year time extension for the signing and recording of final plat for Hartford Subdivision - northeast corner of W. Ustick Road and N. Ten Mile Road: Bird: Item 9, Tabled from January 2"a. Request by Glenn Johnson Homes for a variance allowing aone-year time extension for the signing and recording of Final Plat for Hartford Subdivision -northeast corner of West Ustick Road and North Ten Mile Road. Staff do you have anything for this? Stiles: Is Mr. Johnson or Mr. Jewel in the audience today? I think Council liad some questions. or maybe some clarifications they wanted. I have not been able to contact Mr. Jewel but we'll make sure that they know either Mr. Johnson or Mr. Jewel needs to be in attendance at the next meeting on the 6tn Bird: Do I take it, then, that you want to table it until the first meeting - Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 9 Stiles: The 6tH Bird: -- that would be tabled to February the 6tn~ Stiles: Yes, please. Bird: Is that what you're recommending, Shari? Stiles: Yes. • De Weerd: Mr. President, I move we table the request by Glenn. Johnson Homes for a Variance No. 00-021 to February 6, 2001. Bird: Do I hear a second? McCandless: Second. Bird: Been moved and seconded that we table the variance for aone-year extension for Glenn Johnson Homes at Hartford Subdivision to February 6, 2001. Any discussion? Hearing none, all in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 10. Tabled from January 2, 2001: FP 00-018 Request for Final Plat approval for of 61 building lots and 3 other lots on 23.02 acres by Packard Estates Development for proposed Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2 -south of E. Ustick Road between N. Locust Grove Road and Wingate Lane: Bird: Item No. 10 is tabled from January 2nd. Request for Final Plat approval for of 61 building lots and 3 other lots on 23.02 acres by Packard Estates Development for proposed Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2 -south of East Ustick Road between North Locust Grove Road and Wingate Lane. Staff? Stiles: Mr. President, Council, I don't know if anyone is here from Ada County Highway District to address this issue or if the applicant has anyone here. We did request Ada County Highway District to be in attendance. They indicated at a meeting that we had with them last week that they would be here. There's pretty significant issues dealing with Wingate Lane that we felt that they needed to address. If they're not here I don't know that we can continue. We could go ahead with some of the other items that we've met on. Do you have the comments from staff dated September 28, 2000? Bird: Could you refresh us on the comments from staff on the 28tH so they can be heard? Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 - Page 10 • Stiles: I'll just go over the items that we had met about. We did meet with the applicant and their engineer and there are a few items that remain to be decided. The first item would be Item 9, on our memo dated September 28, 2000. After discussion with Bill Nichols, Legal Counsel, we agreed that the 15-foot wide easement would be what needs to be shown on the plat. It was put out that we couldn't require anything in addition to that 15-foot existing easement that is the private lane easement for Wingate Lane. On Item 9, the 20-foot wide easement would be changed to 15-feet and the last sentence would be deleted. Item 12, on our comments has been fixed on the new plat that's been submitted. Item 13, is regarding an easement for public utilities, drainage and irrigation. We had asked for an additional easement that would be along these lots and also along the Wingate Lane lots. As there is an existing easement for the Wingate Lane here, they would need to provide an additional easement beyond that for utilities, irrigation and drainage. Their response was that they would work out a solution with the Public Works Department that we would like that item to remain as is except it should reference lot 20, block 2 and 15-foot wide easement in lieu of the 20-foot wide easement. I know this isn't making any sense to you if you don't have the comments. I will get a copy to Bill so he can know what's going on. On Item 15, we asked for detailed fencing and gate plans. They had submitted previously some fencing and gate plans. Those were not approved. The irrigation plans, they indicate that this was done as part of a prior approval. The irrigation plans were subject to approval by downstream water users and that can be coordinated through the Public Works Department. I still need details on the fencing and gate. Part of the Wingate Lane discussion has a lot to do with that fencing and gate plan. Item 19, the third sentence may be deleted as it was talking about the 20-foot wide easement. All headgate/cleanout structures are to be located outside of the 15-foot wide easement not the 20-foot wide easement. Item 20, this is probably the biggest issue remaining on this subdivision. Wingate Lane has always been an item of contention since the beginning of this project. Wingate Lane runs north and south from Ustick Road to -there are two five-acre parcels that are still in the County. I'll go back to the aria) so you can see it a little better. This property is currently still in the County, this property is in the County it is owned by Helen and Dale Sharp. Packard Acres No. 1 Subdivision is east of Wingate Lane. All of this area is where Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2 is proposed. As part of the final approval of the Development Agreement and the Preliminary Plat, Ada County Highway Districts' comments in their Conditions of Approval were that there would be a public road in this location linking Packard Acres No. 1 and Packard Acres No. 2. The way that Ada County Highway District comments read, was that there would be a gate constructed on the east and west sides of Wingate Lane across this public road. I think I still need to go back the other one again, sorry, this public road here. What was proposed was there would be a gate here and a gate on the other side of that 15-foot wide easement. There would, in essence, be a permanent fence constructed on each side of that 15-foot lane to prevent anyone in this subdivision or the public in general from accessing Wingate Lane and using it to access Ustick Road. Ada Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 11 County Highway District, in their Conditions of Approval, said the applicant is not to construct a 20-foot wide portion of East Challis Street at the east boundary. He (sic) is to deposit money to complete construction of East Challis Street and remove the gates when and if the two five-acre parcels to the south are developed. Which was when at least this portion of Wingate Lane could be vacated. The City put a condition that a 20-foot wide gate be constructed at the easement line of Wingate Lane that allows Emergency Fire Department access only with appropriate signage. ACHD also had a condition of approval to install gates and allow the passage of pedestrians and bicycles across the un- constructed portion to East Challis Street. The homeowners along Wingate Lane have requested that all access to Wingate Lane be prohibited. This is one of the major items that we are at an impasse and it needs to be decided through the Ada County Highway District and the Council, which of those conflicting requirements will stand. The original conditions of approval of this project required a bike path to be located along the South Slough. The South Slough is designated in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a multiple use pathway. Staff has agreed to not require the pathway but has asked that they pave over the sewer access road that will be constructed along the City's trunk line. Item No. 23, staff had asked, after consulting with our Attorney that the developer have their attorney drop a release of Dominant Parcel Interest in the Private Lane Easement and record it prior to signature on the Final Plat. Also provide a copy of the recorded deed restriction to prohibit access to Wingate Lane and forbid gates or removal of permanent fencing on these lots prior to planning for building permits. Fencing shall be set at the western boundary of the 15-foot easement for Wingate Lane. This requirement as staff asked for, due to the fact that some of these lots, particularly probably this lot due to the size of that lot, it would not be unreasonable to think that the person buying that property would love to come down Wingate Lane. Perhaps have a gate, and park ,his RV in the back. That was an attempt to have all of these lots give up their right to access to that lane until such time it could be vacated. Those are the major items and the remaining items that need to be determined -still not seeing anyone from Ada County Highway District. Do you have any questions of me? Bird: Council any questions for Shari? Anderson: Mr. President, help me to understand the gate stuff and the issue there on Item 20, with Wingate Lane so that I get this straight in my mind. Wingate Lane will have a 15-foot easement; is that correct? Stiles: Yes. Anderson: Wingate Lane comes south from Ustick Road. It services a couple of five-acre parcels that are going to be south of this subdivision? Is that correct? Stiles: Yes, those plus everything north to Ustick Road. All of these lots all access Wingate Lane as their only access. Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 12 Anderson: The Ada County Highway District is asking for a gate to go across Challis both to the east and west of Wingate? The City of Meridian wants access through there for the Fire Department and pedestrians? Stiles: I believe Ada County Highway District is not aware of how their condition actually read. We would like to have access for pedestrians and bicycles and agree with Ada County Highway District on that point but realize the neighbors did not want that. Anderson: Wingate's a gravel road is that correct? Stiles: Yes. Anderson: These homeowners. that are south of where Challis crosses it, it's their desire to continue to access their homes down this gravel road on Wingate? They don't want to go through a paved subdivision to get to their parcels is that what I'm understanding? Stiles: Correct. Anderson: That's the purpose of the gates? Stiles: Yes. Ada County Highway District, the way their report read, was that they would not construct that 15-foot wide portion of Challis. They would put up a deposit to construct it in the future and that on the east and west sides of the un-constructed portion they would put up these gates. Now the Highway District is telling us that they really meant to put two gates on Wingate Lane on the north and south boundaries of Challis so that these property owners back here would have to go through two sets of gates to get to their house. Anderson: Or come through the paved subdivision and then just go through one gate. Stiles: And do away with the gates. Anderson: I think I'm understanding. Stiles: The neighbors are wanting to know what the legal precedents is or what allows Ada County Highway District to basically condemn a portion of their private lane, their existing easement and to allow construction of gates across that lane. Bird: Any other questions for staff? Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 13 Anderson: This will just be a question of the attorney and maybe he doesn't know the answer to this. I've always understood property rights; laws to say that you have to provide access to the property. My question is, if that was the case and they put a gate on the north side of this Challis Drive and blocked off Wingate, the people that own property to the south, if they still had access to their properties through this Challis Drive and through that subdivision? Doesn't' that still fulfill the requirements of the law? You're not blocking them off from access to their property you're just forcing them to go a different way then what they want to go apparently. Nichols: Councilmen Anderson, members of the Council, as a general proposition what you've stated is correct. The difference though here, is that in this case the Sharp's have a 15-foot easement that's attached if you will to their property that runs all the way from Ustick Road to their property boundary. If I recall correctly there's even, I think kind of a joint maintenance thing with the property owners in terms of how they're going to share costs of .road and so on. To cut of their access to Ustick Road on that easement, in effect takes away a part of the easement that goes along with their land. I don't think that's - if that's what ACRD thinks they want to do, it doesn't, it wouldn't be what my advice would be but that's a different issue as far as this Council goes. Staff's recommendation is essentially that you block off vehicular access to Wingate Lane and allow these cars to access the Sharp's property only on Wingate but still have some perhaps pedestrians on this 15-foot easement. The other thing is where this Packard Subdivision is, that property is a party or a piece of the original property to which this 15-foot easement attached. That property has deeded access if you will, to Wingate Lane. That's for the purpose of going up and down so we're asking the developer or requiring the developer to give up part of that. By my way of thinking they would rather go through their subdivision anyway, the streets are going to be better. I think there's - it would seem to me putting a gate on the north and the south side of Challis, interferes with the easement and creates the -it's the vehicle and open the gate, shut the gate, open the next gate and shut that gate. Or install one of those electric ones with the garage door opener type deal and I don't think that's right under these circumstances. Anderson: That was one of my other questions. Are we talking about some elaborate gate system that has automatic openings or are we talking about a manual chainlink fence? Get out and shove the gates out of the way type of deal or does it even specify? Nichols: Looks like Mr. Sale is here so perhaps he can take off his coat, stay awhile and enlighten us on the whole issue. De Weerd: Your timing is always impeccable. Bird: Somebody forgot to tell you we start at 6:30 now didn't they? Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 14 Sale: Perhaps they did and I forgot. Bird: Sorry Larry. (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Anderson: Mr. President, maybe we could brief Larry I guess on kind of where we were. We were getting comments from staff and I was seeking clarification on the gates. Staff had indicated that the original request was that there would be gates on Challis Drive to the ease and west of Wingate. Now they're not sure, they're thinking that Ada County Highway District is now asking for gates on Wingate. We're kind of confused as far as where the gates are and what the legal requirements would be to provide access to the property (inaudible) of Challis. That's kind of where we're at, at this point. Sale: Mr. Anderson did you ever have one of those bad dreams that you kept having and it wouldn't go away? Anderson: Yes, I've had a couple of those. De Weerd: I'm sure those residents have. Bird: Would you state your name Mr. Sales? Sale: My name is Larry Sale, I'm Development Services Supervisor for Ada County Highway District. I'm semi-pleased to be here with the Council tonight. This has been and obviously still is a real thorny issue. I went back through the Commission minutes to make sure that we hadn't said it wrong, but we didn't say it wrong. After listening, at that time if you remember this was October of 1995. At that time there was a lot of testimony from the neighbors about their desire and their need to keep Wingate Lane open. Now how much of that testimony was actually related to Wingate Lane and how much of it was just related to opposing the subdivision, I don't know. At any rate, after discussing this subdivision for two or three meetings, the Commissioners made a motion to find that there was unique and compelling circumstances and that sometimes pollicies had to be set aside to or interpreted differently to accommodate the public good. They made a motion to require the developer of Packard Subdivisions to dedicate right-of--way for what's the name of the street, Challis across Wingate Lane but to not construct it, to pave it up to each side of the Wingate Lane easement and to gate the public .right-of-way. That is an action that's unique in Ada County with one exception. That is there's a public street named Preece Drive or Preece Street that runs east and west from Milwaukee to Cole. It used to run that lane. When the Home Depot was approved in Boise, because of the great difference in land use between the commercial and Mulda family on the west side of a certain line, and an old existing single-family Meridian City Council Meeting January 16,2001 Page 15 neighborhood on the east side of that line. Our Commissioners vacated aone- foot strip of Preece Drive and it has a gate in it. The gate is only for emergency access so that the Fire Department and Emergency vehicles can get through it because nobody else has access to that gate. This, I guess was a like situation. Quite frankly I hoped and still hope that the situation would resolve itself and I guess it partially has. At least one of the two parcels south of Challis has been sold. The Commission's action went on to say that this was a temporary situation, that the developer would be required to deposit the cost of removing the gates and completing Challis Street across this Wingate Lane at the time the two parcels to the south were developed. That's the way it is. It probably isn't a - if it were a permanent decision I would feel badly about it. I think under the six circumstances that it was something the Commissioner's obviously felt they should do. It does have a sunset, it isn't a permanent situation and when the other parcel to the south develops then the gates will be removed. It is possible to go back and revisit the issue. If the neighbors in the are have changed their opinions about the need for the complete Wingate Lane, I suspect the Commissioner's would change that decision. I'm here to offer that as a possibility of the City if you would help me make that request we would take it back to the Commissioners and revisit that decision. Any questions? Bird: Questions, Council? Anderson: I guess it's not really a question as much as it is a comment. It would seem like building two streets and leaving a 15-foot section of dirt in the middle of it doesn't seem to make rhyme or reason to me. When you've got the equipment there, you've got the asphalt spreader, you've go the concrete trucks, you've got your curb machine your set up there doing curb. It would make more sense to me to go ahead, even if you wanted to allow to continue, that easement of Wingate to go ahead to pave it, put the curbs and the sidewalks in that you could still put in your gates. Those could be removed fairly easily but it seems like a lot of additional expense to come back after the fact to put in 15 feet of asphalt and curb and gutter and sidewalk. They could still have their access come in from Ustick Road, they would just drive over, however wide road that is of asphalt and go on down their lane. Then it makes it easy in the future to make that a third string. Sale: Mr. Mayor, Mr. Anderson, you're absolutely correct. As everyone in the room knows, there was some testimony at the time that indicated that the Wingate Lane easement might (sic) be superior to a public road. Since that testimony, we've received documentation that convinces us ,that it is not superior to a public road, it is just another easement on private land. The owner of the public land dedicates right-of-way over the easement then the right-of-way takes precedent. At that time, there was a lot of -- there was a great deal of testimony opposing to the extension of what is now Challis. The Commissioner's didn't want to give up the ultimate ability to make the connection but they felt in view of the overwhelming neighborhood testimony, they needed to listen to that. Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 16 C7 De Weerd: Mr. President, when they do open that are they going to then gate Wingate to the north of East Challis to restrict the access out onto that gravel road? Sale: Mr. President, Ms. De Weerd that wouldn't be necessary we would just treat this as another driveway. It wouldn't have enough traffic on it to warrant any special safety requirements. We would probably require that it be paved back to the right-of-way line so that they wouldn't track mud and gravel onto the pavement. De Weerd: Yes, but that's going to poor quite a bit of traffic out onto Wingate then to Ustick. If you've ever driven in any of those subdivisions I would look for that access myself. Sale: To be honest, I have not driven Wingate Lane since that day. I haven't gone down there looking for it. It doesn't matter to us if there's a concern about traffic using Wingate Lane it can be gated. It's just another driveway as far as we're concerned. The owner of that driveway can gate it, the developer can gate it, and you or the Highway District could require it to be gated that's a simple matter. Anderson: I would imagine those properties if they didn't need the access would vacate that and then that property could be used by the homeowners that bought that wouldn't they? (Inaudible) vacated easement. Nichols: Councilmen Anderson that would be a pretty major chore I would think because all of those parties that have to - it wouldn't be like a vacation of a public easement or where you simply petition the City. You have to have all the parties to whom the easement runs would have to release the easement, extinguish it. Anderson: Not likely to happen. Bird: Mr. Sales, as I understand it right now, the Commission is saying bring Challis in there and then gate east and west sides so you have no access on Wingate at all? Sale: Mr. President, that's correct. De Weerd: Was that also the recommendation of our staff, Shari? Stiles: In lieu of any alternative to come forward, yes. Anderson: Maybe we could hear from (inaudible), his point of view. Just the whole picture I guess. Meridian City Council Meeting ~ • January 16, 2001 Page 17 De Weerd: And the residents. Bird: Yes, we can. Do you have any other questions for Mr. Sale? Anderson: Not right now. Sale: If you would like I would read into the record the action of the - Bird: Would you please? Sale: This was the concluding discussion of the discussion of Packard Subdivision No. 2 on October 18, 1994. Commissioner here we're moved to accept staff recommendations but to alter it whereby the developer has the opportunity to cross Wingate Lane with the public right-of-way. The portion crossing Wingate Lane will remain gravel, the portions east and west will be gated in a manner which will allow pedestrian access and that at the time the Rickord and Sharp parcels developed, the public right-of-way will be open and will provide connectivity between the two neighborhoods. This motion is made because of the unique and compelling circumstance and requires a little different approach to the policies. To implement this motion, the developer will be required to dedicate the right-of-way, will not construct the roadway, would deposit the cost of constructing the roadway into the Road Trust Fund. Further that the developer's required to provide an easement physical connection from the Rickord property to the public road system and the subsequent lot purchasers of the subdivision not be responsible for the maintenance of Wingate lane. In as much as they will not have access to it. Commissioner East Lay seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Bird: Thank you Mr. Sale. Okay, Represent? De Weerd: You were early and under our old schedule. Bird: Would you please state your name? Tealey: Mr. President and members of the Council, my name is Pat Tealey, office address 2501 Bogus Basin Road. I'm here representing the applicant. The applicant is also here for any input that he can offer on this issue. I'm glad Larry showed up, I was going to ask for at the worst, another deferment (inaudible) which we all don't want to do. I think you all have been here from the beginning of this and stayed at this. This actually started in 1994 and here we are six years later, still with the same basic issue, what to do with Wingate Lane. It hasn't gone away, won't go away and shouldn't go away, there are people with -the Sharp's definitely do have an access easement across the 15 feet as being platted as part of Packard Acres No. 2. This is an easement only there is no ownership involved in this by any other parties. The parties to this easement Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 18 • range all the way from Ustick down to the Sharp's parcel. They all own their adjoining land in feet. The access is simply that an easement, there is no ownership involved in this at all. I think that was one of the major issues from the start that the City and the Highway District didn't know this. They thought each, that there was natural ownership in the land itself, the 15 feet so there are other rights perceived by this misunderstanding. Mr. Nichols has reviewed the easement and in our staff meeting has basically indicated that the easement is in fact only for access purposes. It is not exclusive; in other words that 15-foot strip can only be used for access. There are other easements that can be granted pertinent to this land. The access cannot be impeded, that's the only thing that really goes with the easement. In other words we can't block their access to their parcel. As stated there were at the time, two five-acre parcels-north of what is going to be platted as Challis Street. The Rickord parcel, one of the five-acre parcels where the cursor is right now has been bought by the developers of Packard Acres, the only people that access Wingate Lane. South of what would be Challis would be the Sharp's parcel where the cursor is right now. The people to the north of the platted subdivision really aren't affected by anything we're doing down in this area of Wingate Lane. We are not affecting their access from Ustick Road. We aren't doing anything north of our property line, which is about south of where that cursor is. I forget which parcel it is. From here north this parcel here can access (inaudible) and all of these parcels over here along Wingate Lane can access from Ustick Road and won't be impeded by anything that we're doing in Packard Acres No. 2. The issue is boiling down to the access to the Sharp parcel. The developer of course would like to see no gates on Challis, which I think is the proper solution, however the powers that be have offered other solutions to it. The solutions that you hear about the gates I believe are only there to address the neighbors concern, the Sharp's concern. Certainly the public would be better served by a connected. street in that area, both as a safety issue and an access issue. There is a newly constructed school I think which you can see the pad over there. The way the neighbors want it, there will be no pedestrian or vehicle access from the west of the cursor to that school over there. It seems natural that they ought to be able to walk the sidewalks and bike along the streets to get to that school and to other -just their neighbors. This is a neighborhood that we're actually building out there and we're throwing a barrier up between these two neighborhoods. Basically, if you want to go to Eagle Road, you have to head west a half mile, north a half mile and east a mile to get over to Eagle road. You're pretty good with that cursor Shari. As stated, I think the solution of the gates was there to address the Sharps' issue. If that's a solution that comes down the developer will live with it. We don't think it's a good solution, I don't think you think it's a .good solution and I believe that if the Highway District were to address this again that you wouldn't come up with the same solution once the issue has been understood. However you must respect the public input and if the Sharp's carry enough weight to get those gates built and the other neighbors, we're not just saying just the Sharp's. They're the only ones that really access this thing though, then that has to be respected and we will build the gates. You just have to tell us what kind. Do we want to build Meridian City Council Meeting ~ • January 16, 2001 Page 19 physical barriers there where no access across that 15-foot area is allowed which is what the City of Meridian's solution is or do we want to allow pedestrian and bicycle access across that area which is the ACHD's solution? I believe that's really the only two issues. Stated again, I don't believe those gates would be there in any normal solution, this is something out of the ordinary. As far as the other conditions that were put on the plat, we have had talks with staff; we don't have any problems with what they're asking for. We have a couple of other conversations to have with the Public Works Department about the sewer access road and sewer easement. I believe that can be handled by staff, we work with them they work with us. All references to the 20-foot easement for Wingate Lane should be reduced to the 15, which is the existing. We have had talks with staff and with the Fire Department as far as what they want. I believe we can work out Item No. 23, which states that the attorney draws up the release of (inaudible), a parcel interest. I believe the attorney for the applicant and Mr. Nichols the City Attorney, can work that out against themselves. Are there any questions I would be glad to answer? Bird: Council, any questions? Anderson: This is Packard Estates No. 2. No. 1, where will they gain their access how will you get into that? Tealey: From Hickory. Anderson: Which is? Is that on the map there? Tealey: You just see the end of it right here. (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members.) Anderson: My other question would be then as developers, you folks have met with the Sharp's and weren't able to work out any details on them using the subdivision roads to gain access to your property? Has that been explored or that's not an acceptable solution to them? Tealey: I believe the answer is it's not an acceptable solution to them. They have traditionally come down from Ustick and used Wingate Lane and they want to do that in the future. There is a road in Packard Acres No. 1 that dead ends into their property a little bit further -about where the end of the picture is there's a road that dead ends into the Sharp parcel from Packard Acres No. 1. There's also Challis, which will go across the top there, which they can get back down Wingate Lane. They choose not to use those paved public access roads they choose to use Wingate Lane as their access. They have the easement to do it so we're not fighting that at all, never have fought it it's just the solution is just not, at this time a good solution. Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 20 • Bird: Mr. Tealey, if we allow gates or no gates across there and stuff what do you think that 90 percent of the traffic is going to go to get out? They're going to come right up and go up Wingate Lane to the north to get to Ustick. Tealey: I'll bet you there'll be a few that adventure up there and want to go out there the first few times. That is a dusty road, it is bad access to Ustick. The entrance is very dangerous actually at that intersection and certainly, I guess my solution to that problem would be, again excuse me for going to the picture again. De Weerd: Just grab the microphone Mr. Tealey. Tealey: My solution to the problem would be to gate it right here. The Sharp parcel could access out Challis this way and this way. They could come into this street that we're platting as part of Packard Acres No. 1. Get out this way and getout this way. These people here would still guarantee their access and the traffic that would _go north of Ustick would be stopped by that gate right there. As long as we're talking about gates that would be my solution. Bird: The only problem is the Sharp's and that other property which you guys have already purchased I understand, have an easement coming down Wingate. Wingate no way is going to be able to take any more traffic than it already is. I disagree with you, I think that the people in that subdivision are (sic) going to go up Wingate a lot more than they're going to come out to Fairview or any place else coming through their subdivision, if that's an access to get out to. The thing Mr. Tealey, that I see is maybe, and Wingate is not capable of handling anymore traffic than it already is. I don't know whether it's considered a public road or it's a private lane, as I understand. I don't know if it's even considered to be that. Tealey: I don't even believe it to be a private lane there's an access easement. Bird: It's an access easement that goes all the way down to Sharp's property. It's a real problem. Tealey: It's an odd situation but I don't believe it's without parallel in Ada County. Certainly there are situations like this that arise. I agree there would be extra traffic down there and something has to be done to stop that traffic is what that is. My solution would be to put the gate at the north end of our property. It doesn't inhibit the access for anybody that uses Wingate Lane to the north of the subdivision. It would hinder the Sharp's access if they were to come down Ustick, however they would have to go through a gate. They would be routed with public access from two different sources though. It is an odd situation and I think that's where the solution was born on it. We sat here from meeting after meeting after meeting trying to hammer this out and this is what came out of it. If the gates are what have to be fine we'll do it you just tell us what kind of gate you want there. I don't think again though, the developer, myself, and I even think Meridian City Council Meeting • • January 16, 2001 Page 21 the Highway District and the City don't think that's a good solution because it just doesn't make sense to gate a public road. However in this situation it may make the only sense that we can get out of this. Bird: Any other questions? Anderson: I have none. Bird: Thank you Mr. Tealey. Council any questions of anybody here before we go forward, of staff or Mr. Sales? Anderson: I have none. De Weerd: Not at this point. Bird: Council discussion? Anderson: I know this isn't a public hearing but are the Sharp's, here? Would it be appropriate to hear their views on this particular issue since we're talking about access to their property? Nichols: Councilmen Anderson, members of the Council there's not prohibition against hearing from them. There's nothing in the Ordinances or statues that says that you can't ask them something or have them state their position. Bird: With Council permission? Is everybody agreeable? Would Mr. and Mrs. Sharp like to give you a couple free minutes here? Helen Sharp: I'm Helen Sharp, I of course am the one that lives on the end of the lane. To a few staff, thank you for wanting to listen to us I think it's only fair. I find the thing that's very, very interesting when they asked did you have meetings with the members of the lane? No, the only one we met was Craig after he bought it and told us what was going to be done. The meetings with Ada County Highway was more than two, my husband and I went to several meetings and it was stated, they had no jurisdiction over a private lane. If you will contact Ada County they will tell you it is a private lane and there is to be no more access. I have been down to the records, I have been to Planning and Zoning, and I've been to all of them. They have it flagged, there will be no more on Wingate Lane as it's a private lane. A private lane constitutes no more than four, which means our Ada County is illegal because they granted building permits on more than four acres. As you can tell I'm very disturbed and I'm having a real problem. We've been there since 1968, and now they're going to say because of public we should allow them to cut us off so that we haven't got the access to Wingate Lane. If you're going to bring the garbage trucks down -- our friends coming down Wingate to see us they're going to have to go through the subdivision. Can you imagine what a nice turn that's going to be coming from their subdivision on Meridian City Council Meeting ~ • January 16, 2001 Page 22 Wingate Lane? Do you who live in a subdivision, would you like to have more traffic through your subdivision? The words we're getting out there is no. As far as access into that new school which is a lovely building, they can't come in that way they have to go around the front so they would have to revamp that. My question to you, I could go on for a long time, has this really been completely pursued? I'm sure that the minutes that Shari has as to the gates on the east and the west is a little different than what he's saying on the north and the south because I was at the meeting when it said no, we have no jurisdiction on a private lane. That is a private lane. Thank you. Bird: Thank you, Council? Council Mr. Sharp would like to speak, agreeable? Anderson: Sure. Dale Sharp: I'm Dale Sharp and I live on Wingate Lane. They say we're the only ones concerned but I think in our letters to the -has been made part of the meetings previously that all of the neighbors are very much concerned of any additional traffic whether it be foot traffic or bicycle traffic. People come down there and they walk their dogs down there and they won't move aside for us to get through. It's like we have a right to be there, we can exercise on this lane. We're not the exercise for the subdivisions there. They should use their own subdivision for that purpose. As far as access, we do have that Private Road Agreement. It's been in effect since 1913 and it very clearly states that it is a Private Road Agreement. As such it should be - we should adhere to that. The Ada County Planning and Zoning did say that there would be no more access off of Wingate Lane, four or more houses. The developer says well it's not that it's another sort of enterprise but it is houses. Speaking for the neighbors, they are very much concerned. Thank you. Bird: Thank you. Council what's your pleasure? McCandless: Mr. President, am I to understand that this has been more or less of a private road into the Shari's residence? Bird: It's a private lane. Helen Sharp: Yes, it's a private lane, (inaudible) access from Ustick. Right now it's our only access to our property, (inaudible) the original agreement for this piece of property because of the first one on the front coming right off Ustick. They made the agreement and I'm sure they owned all of that property because we were the only two houses on that road. In order for us to get down there the agreement was made by these other (inaudible) that we would have access to it. I think another problem too is when people buy that land - Bird: Ma'am -Mrs. Sharp. Meridian City Council Meeting • January 16, 2001 Page 23 McCandless: Thank you. Bird: Mr. Nichols is that, as she stated a private road? Nichols: President Bird, I think it's simply an access easement. To boil this down here, the issue before the Council's whether to grant Final Plat approval and if so with what conditions. You have before you a report from your staff dated September 28, which has - Shari's gone through and made some corrections, some notations, updated that staff report. That staff report includes a condition if you will, that Wingate Lane be gated off on the east side and the west side of that lane. Mr. Sale has been here to clarify the issue and read into the record the minutes from the Ada County Highway District meeting as which that's the same thing as said with the exception of the allowance of pedestrian access. I guess what I'm saying to you is, we do not have an issue other than the applicant saying maybe we could gate someplace else and so forth. As far your staff, ACHD, and so on it's a gate on both sides of Wingate Lane where it crosses Challis. Leave it unimproved, the developer makes his deposit and at some point in time it's likely the Sharp property will be developable. They'll want to develop it or their successors or somebody they sell to. At that time this issue goes away. Right now, what you have before you is your recommendation, your staff with those notations that she's made. I guess what l'm telling you is we can get lost in the issue of what is Wingate Lane and try to divine what -- it would take somebody a tremendous vision in 1913 to see what was happening out there now. You have to make the best soup with the ingredients you have now and I think that's where you are. Bird: Council, we have allowed the Sharp's to speak and the developer is here if it would be with your approval he would like to speak for a short period. Like two or three minutes. Groves: Mr. Bird, Council members, thank you very much. My name is Craig Groves, I am one of the managing members for Packard Estates Development. Unfortunately, I wasn't at these Public Hearings back in 1994 and if I were I probably wouldn't be in this position here today. We acquired an ownership interest in this project back in July of 1999. We have met with Mr. and Mrs. Sharp just a couple of times and met with some of the other neighbors out on site. Really, we're at your guidance here. Whatever you guys decide is appropriate, you know we'll live with that. I would like to make just two points. The first point is that as a property owner, developer of the project, we are giving up a tremendous amount of our rights. One of the conditions of the Preliminary Plat approval is that you're asking us to basically give up our dominant ownership interest in Wingate Lane on those properties that adjoin there forever. We're agreeing that we will draft a document to make it part of the plat, make it part of the covenance that will prohibit any access onto Wingate Lane. We certainly agree with that but the other condition of giving up that 15 feet forever is a big issue. We can work through that issue also. The next issue that we have is that Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 24 • in our meeting with Mr. and Mrs. Sharp and the other owners, they've been very, very adamant that they want absolutely a solid locked gate going east and west across Challis. That's really not our understanding of the development conditions of approval, what the Ada County Highway District adopted and what the City of Meridian adopted. It's very clear that they will allow pedestrian and bicycle access across there through those gates. For that reason, and I would like to see the Council do today is give us our Final Plat approval and defer the rest of the question back to the Highway District as far as the gate and the types of gate issue. Thank you. Bird: Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Groves? Anderson: I have none. Bird: Council, I believe we've heard from everybody that's necessary, what's your pleasure? Anderson: I just have one more question for Shari about the gate. Are we in agreement with Ada County Highway District about the type of gate .and the type of access that we're talking about? Is it pedestrian and bicycle is that what the City of Meridian's wanting too? Stiles: I believe that we would want to have pedestrian and bicycle access through there so the children can get to the Elementary School. It is the Sharp's desire that there be absolutely no access to it. Anderson: Is there aquestion -are we requesting emergency access for Fire Department too or is that not an issue? Stiles: Yes, then we would need to have Fire Department, emergency access. Bird: Any other questions Council? Discussion? I entertain a motion. Anderson: Mr. President, I guess in light of all of the testimony we've heard I agree with the City Attorney. This has already been through Public Hearings at Planning and Zoning and at the Ada County Highway District. At this time I'm not sure that we're going to resolve the Sharp's issue with the road so both the developer and the City are in agreement with a solution how this can still .get done. I don't see any reason to deny the Final Plat at this point. The only remaining issue seems to be the type of gating system and I would feel comfortable having that worked out at staff level. I would make a motion that we approve this Final Plat for 61 building lots and 3 other lots for Packard Estates Development and instruct the City Attorney to drop the appropriates Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Decision of Order. Bird: Before that's seconded, Mr. Anderson does that include staff comments? Meridian City Council Meeting • January 16, 2001 Page 25 Anderson: Yes it does. Subject to the staff comments. Bird: Do I hear a second? De Weerd: Second. Bird: Been made and seconded to approve other lots for Packard Acres Subdivision discussion Council? • Final Plat for 61 building lots and 3 No. 2 with staff comments. Any De Weerd: Mr. President, just a question for staff. Have you the answer to work with ACHD on the gates, or the developer would work with ACHD on that? Is that normal protocol in regard to what kind of gates and those kinds of issues? Stiles: It would probably be more appropriate to work with the Emergency Services on what types of gate they would want there. I don't think there's any real president for gates crossing a public road. Bird: Any other questions or discussion? De Weerd: No. Bird: Hearing none, Roll-call vote, Mr. Clerk please. Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 11. Ordinance No. 01-900: AZ 00-009 Request for annexation and zoning of 101.4 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Autumn Faire Subdivision by Gem Star Properties, LLC -southwest corner of Black Cat and Ustick Roads: Bird: No. 11, Ordinance NO. 01-900. Request for annexation and zoning of 101.4 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Autumn Faire Subdivision by Gem Star Properties, LLC. Clerk would you read the Ordinance by title only please? Berg: Thank you Mr. President, Ordinance No. 01-900: An Ordinance finding that certain land be known as Autumn Faire Subdivision lies contiguous or adjacent to the City limits of the City of Meridian, County of Ada, State of Idaho; finding that the owner has made a request for annexation in writing to the Council; and that said land be annexed to the City of Meridian and zoning designated low-density residential district R-4; and declaring that the said land by proper legal description as described below be a part of the City of Meridian, County of Ada, State of Idaho repealing all Ordinances, resolutions, orders or Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 26 parts thereof in conflict herewith; and directing the City engineer to add said property to official maps of the City of Meridian, Idaho; and directing the Clerk of the City of Meridian to file a certified copy of the Ordinance and map of the areas to be annexed with the Ada County Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer, Assessor and the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho pursuant to Idaho Code, Section 50-223 and Section 63-2215. Bird: Thank you Mr. Clerk. Is there anybody from the Ordinance that would like this Ordinance read in its entirety? Hearing none, Council what's your pleasure, 01-900, Council? De Weerd: Mr. President, I move that we approve Ordinance No. 01-900 for AZ 00-009 request for annexation and zoning of Autumn Faire Subdivision and to instruct the Mayor to sign and Clerk attest. Bird: Do we hear a second? Anderson: Second. Bird: Any discussion? Hearing none, we had a motion and second to pass Ordinance No. 01-900 with suspension of rules. Clerk, Roll-call vote. Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 12. Tabled from January 2, 2001: FP 00-020 Final Plat approval of 47 building lots and 3 other lots on 14.93 acres in an R-4 zone for Autumn Faire Subdivision No. 1 by Gem Star Properties, LLC - south of W. Ustick Road and west of N. Black Cat Road: Bird: Item No. 12, is tabled from January 2"d. The Final Plat approval for 47 building lots and 3 other lots on 14.93 acres in an R-4 zone for Autumn Faire Subdivision No. 1 by Gem Star Properties, LLC. Staff, comments? Stiles: As a Development Agreement has been approved and the Annexation Ordinance has now been passed, staff would recommend approval of Autumn Faire Subdivision No.1 with all staff and agency comments. Bird: Council, question for staff? Anderson: I have none. Bird: Is the applicant here? Do you have anything to comment? Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 27 • Wildwood: Mr. President, my name is Susan Wildwood. I'm the Attorney for the applicant and the only comment I have is I appreciate the time the staff has taken working with us on this. We have some issues that we are working at very, very minor and they just have to do with the staff recommendations. Any of that can be handled at the staff level. We do appreciate staff's time. Thank you. Bird: Council any questions for Ms. Wildwood? De Weerd: I have none. Bird: Thank you. Council, what's your pleasure? De Weerd: Mr. President, I move that we approve the Final Plat of FP 00-020 for Autumn Faire Subdivision by Gem Star Properties, and to have the attorney to draw the appropriate paper work. Bird: Do we hear a second? Anderson: Second. De Weerd: To include all staff comments please. Bird: That includes all staff comments. Had a motion to pass Autumn Faire Subdivision Final Plat for 47 building lots and 3 other lots and has been seconded with staff comments. Roll-call vote please, Mr. Clerk. Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye. MOTION. CARRIED: ALL AYES Bird: Council, with your approval can we take about afive- orten-minute break? Anderson: Sure. Bird: So moved? De Weerd: So moved. Bird: Thank you. De Weerd: Second. Bird: All in favor aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 28 (Meeting reconvened at 8:25 p.m.) Item 13. Tabled from January 2, 2001: FP 00-025 Final Plat approval of 54 building lots and 8 other lots on 19.08 acres in an R-4 zone for Bridgetower Subdivision No. 1 by Primeland Development Co., LLP -north of W. Ustick Road and east of N. Ten Mile Road: Bird: Council on Item 13, the Final Plat for Bridgetower Subdivision by Primeland Development Co. Staff? Is she lost now? De Weerd: I'm sure there's just major problems that (inaudible). Bird: I apologize for the delay. Shari, we're on the Primeland Development the Final Plat. Item No. 13. Stiles: Mr. President, Council, I believe this was tabled last time to give Legal Counsel an opportunity to review our piping of ditches Ordinance and give his determination for the bonding of the Cresson Lateral. Nichols: President Bird, members of the Council, I have looked at our Ordinance and I've got a response from the developers attorney which was faxed over to my office late this afternoon. What it boils down to is, the question is, can we, by our Ordinance require the tiling of a ditch if that ditch doesn't lie entirely on the property of the developer? The Ordinance provision in question, I'm going to read it it's 12-4-13c. It talks about boundary line ditches and I'll just read it. Boundary line ditches agreement with owner, payment of cost. Where the ditch under consideration is on the boundary between the land being developed and the adjacent land not owned by the developer or the owner of the land being developed or is in fact the boundary, the ditch shall still be tiled. The developer shall attempt to obtain the permission of the adjacent landowner to the the ditch and attempt to have the adjacent landowner share in the cost of the tiling. If the adjacent land owner is unwilling to cooperate in sharing the cost of the tiling, but willing to allow the use of his land for tiling the developer shall the the ditch at his sole cost. If the adjacent land owner is unwilling to allow his land to be used for purposes of tiling the ditch, the developer may request the City to condemn that part of the adjacent land necessary to the the water way. The developer shall be required to pay all of the costs of condemnation, pay all of the costs of obtaining the adjacent land and all of the cost tiling- the ditch lateral or canal. There is another provision in the same co-section 12-4-13a2 which says, the City may waive the requirement for recovering such ditch lateral or canal if it finds that the public purpose requiring such will not be served in the individual case. What we have is the Creason Lateral that goes along several sides of the property and then drops on the north south line I think. Gary and I were looking at the map. I'm going to have Gary use the cursor to show where this goes. Anyway it's a Nampa Meridian ditch, and when we look at the proposed Final Plat itself it shows the Creason Lateral which there's a 60-foot easement for that lateral. I Meridian City Council Meeting • January 16, 2001 Page 29 see Ms. Bowcutt is here and she can explain to us, but I think that the boundary lines, it looks to me like the boundary line for block 4 which is the northern portion of this is right at the edge of the Nampa Meridian easement. She could perhaps clarify that for us. Bird: Ms.6owcutt? Bowcutt: Becky Bowcutt, 11283 West Hickory Dale, Boise. I brought a blow-up of that area to kind of try to show you what is represented up there on the screen. What you see here is the first phase of our project, this loop here. We have the Creason coming through our property here; this would be a latter phase. As it comes through, at this point here, our property boundary is right there and it's running. The pink is what would be the top of the bank. The pink is off set from our north boundary it varies from three to five feet because it's a ditch and it meanders. That ditch goes in, there's Mr. Husky's property here, and then tuns and comes down. It kind of widens out and it does run right here along the edge here. As you can see it looks like the ditch kind of widens out and then the ditch turns and heads to the west. This kind of shows you and you can pass it along, if you want to look at it. That's what we have out there in the field at this time and as we stated before we have every intention in complying with your Ordinance as that crease intreverses through our parcel we'll be piping it in accordance with Nampa Meridian standards. The issue arises when the ditch is not contiguous and according to Mr. Snider's definition under praises and so forth that was faxed over, if something is contiguous it touches. In reference to your Ordinance it talks about touch, laterals, ditches or canals touch either or both sides of the area. I think in the past the staff has always concluded if the easement overlapped onto the property, which we do have some overlap of easement on our parcel then that constituted it touching your boundary. Therefore you were required to pipe it. The issue behind the ditch Ordinance is safety. We are required under your Ordinance to fence our perimeter, so if we fence our entire perimeter out obviously we would cut off any access to the ditch at least from our parcel. Secondly, we got to thinking about it and the Husky property in question is outside the City limits so it's under jurisdiction of Ada County. Then I got to thinking does Meridian Ordinance apply outside the City limits and the County? That's another question in itself. It's not an easy answer to this but we're trying to look out from a practical perspective. Obviously the Husky property is going to develop. Water and sewer are going to be available. In fact I think they are close to being available now. When that property develops that ditch will have to be piped. Until then there are several complicated headgates which checked that water up, then that water backs up and then drops five to six feet. They have to check it up in order to get enough water to irrigate. One of the concerns that we had, if we go in there messing with this even if, hypothetically Mr. Husky - we could get him to agree to this, how are we going to impact his irrigation? That is one of my concerns. I did talk with Nampa Meridian about it, Nampa Meridian said that if the property is on Mr. Husky's we have to have his permission. If he's an agreeable fellow and hasn't been with us in the past then there's nothing that Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 30 • Nampa Meridian can do, that's what they indicated to me. It was Bill Hanson that I spoke with. Mr. Anderson is on vacation all month. One of the other concerns that we had, if we put in elaborate box systems throughout there then when the property is developed those structures would almost likely be eliminated. There will be no need for them, possibly some safety issues or just trying to work around them. That maybe money that is not very well spent, that's one of other concerns. There was discussion about bonding. Could one bond for say your proportionate share of this for an indefinite amount of time? We've done some checking with some of the financial institutions that my client deals with and I believe the maximum is a three-year bond. I guess they charge quite a premium if one has athree-year bond. We have to obviously keep track of this, renew it if by chance the property, the Husky property that is did not develop within that time frame. One advantage that I feel we do have is this is not the only portion of what's being developed. We've submitted application to your Planning. Department on Friday for development of the rest of this property, which I think, is around 370 acres. We have an annexation PUD and Preliminary Plat application. Obviously with an application of that magnitude, I believe over 750 lots, we will be doing many multiple phases at the City for many, many years. We feel that the City has the ability as these other projects are coming through phase by phase or with Preliminary Plats that if it is imperative that that be done at that time they have the opportunity to impose the requirement on us. We're just concerned that it wouldn't be prudent to do it at this time and the complications with dealing with Mr. Husky, they're legal problems, we just don't see the benefit. We had asked the Council under that section, it says that the Council can consider a waiver of it under certain circumstances and I guess we would ask for your indulgence. Do you have any questions? Bird: Mr. Nichols did you have some questions? Nichols: Yes, Ms. Bowcutt, with regard to Nampa Meridian, did they indicate whether they would be willing to approach Mr. Husky about permission to put the pipe in? Bowcutt: When I talked to Bill about that they only accept projects where they construct the first week of September of every year. There's one day where you may submit an application for Nampa meridian to install where you provide all materials. In talking to Bill, Bill didn't see that while the properties being farmed that it's imperative that they pipe it with -they've to the complicated check structures and weirs and so forth. If Mr. Husky did throw a fit, I don't know if Nampa Meridian would go ahead and force the issue at that time. My dealings with him as I said before have not been good. On an indirect basis he seems to send everything to his attorney who then comes up with a menagerie of requirements, potential problems and issues. It just goes so far that you've got to find another solution. At least that's my experience. Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 31 • Nichols: Ms. Bowcutt if this Final Plat was approved, what's your construction schedule and when would you have these lots for sale on the north side of this? Bowcutt: Our construction schedule sir, is probably going to begin around the first of February. Lots would probably be available early summer, June, July depending on plat recording. There would be water in the ditch. It's too late this year to go through and pipe it. They don't allow you to pipe I believe after March 15th isn't it Gary? March 15th is their deadline. Water comes down the ditch on April 12-15. Unless you have your plans approved and are considerably under way early you're kind of stuck until the next season when water's out of the ditch. Nichols: What's your proposal with regard to that portion of the Cresson Lateral that does even fit Mr. Snider's definition of contiguous? Bowcutt: We discussed that. I believe Mr. Variall's conversation that we had today was that we would obviously approach Mr. Husky. We've also got a small strip in there of some USA ground, we're having the Title Company pull that information to see if maybe that portion on that west side is on USA property, Bureau of Recreation. There's a small sliver in the assessor's map. We found some of that same information on the assessor's maps within portions of our property but then through title searches it was found that that was not correct. We are researching that and exploring that avenue. I believe where it's touching is on the west boundary as the ditch comes back in if you look at that drawing. That topo was shot from the ground, which is not the arial topo out there that we purchased from the City. Bird: Council any other questions? Anderson: I had a question Mr. President. Becky you said you have all of these additional acres that you're going to develop. Where are they, aren't they north of there and kind of to the east? Bowcutt: Yes sir, and to the west. They wrap around Mr. Husky's property. Shari can you go further up? Stiles: Not on this one you can't. Let's look at the whole square mile. Bird: There's the property right there. (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Bowcutt: What we're asking approval on at this time is this portion of the property right here. Our property boundary comes up right there, it comes out to Ten Mile, up to McMillian, across to Linder, down this way, this way and that way. Anderson: Why don't you circle the part you don't own over there. Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 32 • Bowcutt: That's an easier question. That stuff right there, Mr. Husky right there and this little piece right there. Then the property also takes an 80 up there, a 160 here and an 80 there I believe. My client owns that too. Anderson: I guess kind of back to the City Attorney's question. If all of that other land is ultimately yours and it's going to develop, his question was what's your proposal? Are you proposing tiling that stuff that you know that you're going to develop anyway and are we just talking about the piece of property that's adjacent to Mr. Husky's that you're opposing tiling? Bowcutt: Yes sir, only when the ditch leaves our property, which is right at that point. As it comes past these homes it leaves our property and is clearly outside our boundary. It turns, and then as it comes down our western boundary it does come in and it looks like it runs parallel and contiguous to our boundary there, right there. All of this as it enters our eastern boundary, we are piping and we'll pipe all of that until it exits. The only portion in contention is when it exits our property. Does that - Anderson: That helps. Nichols: Mr. President Bird, Ms. Bowcutt, I want to make sure I understand or clarify something, make sure I didn't hear something different than what I think I did. Are you saying that your client is willing to defer the tiling issue or to make future development contingent upon - in other words if we say, work on the tilling issue? Bowcutt: Yes sir. Nichols: If you don't come up with a solution be prepared that some future development if it were otherwise approved by the City would be contingent upon finishing the tiling. Is that what I was hearing you say? You said something about you're going to .have other things before the City might be -we're not going to presume approval, but assuming that it were approved. That sounded like you could -- we've got other things we're going to have to pipe, we're going to have to do other things. You could approve this one and then make future approvals contingent upon giving you time to work on these issues or maybe Mr. Husky's not in the picture anymore it's somebody else. The issues about to probate and so forth or been resolved and you know who you're dealing with etc. I need you to clarify on that. Bowcutt: Mr. Nichols, I think what I was alluding to unlike some developments where once this parcel is developed the development is over, it ends. That is the perimeters of it. This development is much larger than that. I guess what I was alluding to that the City would have ample opportunity because of these multiple plat applications, annexation, PUD to request tiling of some of these ditches. Am Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 33 I trying to move it out into the future? I would like to solve it as soon as possible. I just don't think it can be solved on this first phase. I guess I am trying to move it out a little bit. Frank am I wrong, one of the reasons being is we disagree with the staff's interpretation of the Ordinance? Maybe in the future we have a new Ordinance. Varialle: Frank Varialle, Primeland Development. There's probably two parts to that if I might -Councilman Bird, .and Mr. Nichols. The first part is I think that we would be willing to look at -knowing that we are going to be talking to you over a long period of time. When the Husky ground does come up for development, if - to deal with the portion of that ditch which does seem to touch us actually and then leave us again, we would be willing to work with the developer. Whoever we feel should be tiling that ditch when they purchase that property. We would be willing to work with them on the portion that abuts us in sharing the cost of that or whatever to see that that happens. We feel fairly strongly that the ditch is not on our property and is really out of our control. ,There seems to be a lot of room in here from what my attorney's telling me and so forth as to what the definitions are within the Ordinance you have. Becky's suggestion as to perhaps move this on into future phases is to what the exact determination is made on what we do with the Husky portion allows us time to work with staff, to work with Mr. Nichols and the City to come to a final resolution. This (inaudible) everybody with less pressure upon us. We were only made aware of this particular problem a few weeks ago and it seems to be one that's very difficult to resolve and having a little bit more time to do that I think would be in everybody's best interest. I think -there are kind of two parts to that. Any questions? Bird: Frank, isn't the parcel that is there to the north of you right there - is that flood irrigated out of that ditch? Varialle: Yes it is. Bird: By tiling it what is that going to do to the flood irrigation? Varialle: We don't know exactly. I know that Mr. Husky takes water at the turn right there and I believe also where it first enters, you can kind of see a ditch heading north. We would need some type of facility as a minimum there where it moves north and then again where it makes the turn south as a minimum. Then as you come down the west boundary we've lost it a little bit there. It comes back, one more shot. Right there. where the light is, is a check gate that has to check the water up about four or five feet to go out the north there. The difficulties in -we're not just talking about running pipe here -the difficulties of working with Mr. Husky is also going to be unsatisfying his needs to get his irrigation water. That's going to be very expensive. Once we've achieved that, and the point in the future arrives when that ground is going to be developed, all of those mechanisms, boxes, flood control, floodgates, and whatever irrigation gates will all have to be torn out and sections of the pipe rebuilt. We feel that, Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 34 once again we're just spending a lot of money to achieve something that the necessity doesn't seem to be very high. Bird: Thank you. Anderson: Mr. President, Frank I just had one question. Since the Creason Lateral does come back into your property over there on that west side, I mean a reasonable expectation at this point because we really don't' know what's going to happen with the property to the north of you and who might buy that and things like that. It would seem logical that doing a letter of credit or bonding for half of the cost of tiling that ditch from the point where it leaves your property to where it's in question. You do a bud in the easement and then it comes back into your property. Becky (sic) had indicated that that's a substantial cost but I can't imagine that could be that expensive to post a bond or do a letter of a credit for three years. After three years we would have a good idea probably at that point because you're going to be well into some of these developments. What's going to happen with that property to the north? Is that not acceptable to you? Varialle: The little bit of inquire I've been able to do about bonding is it's not quite as easy as it sounds. The banks want things more definitive than -we're handing you a bond to the a ditch that's not on our property, the controls that they're looking for are not all in place. It's just not as easy as it sounds. I can bond anything on my property very easily but you start reaching our beyond my boundaries and they are all kind of want a lot of explanations. Anderson: We could put a condition on there that said you're responsible for half of the cost but the problem with that is if you sell your interest in this later on how do we hold somebody to that? If you go out of business it would be very difficult for us to hold anybody to that. That's the purpose of the bond or the letter of credit. Like Becky suggested that maybe somehow the tiling of this ditch could be held to future phases or something. We've seen in other developments around this community where a developer will sell out his interest to another company. Then it's virtually impossible for us to come back and hold those future developers that may own that to a condition or not even a condition but kind of an implied thing that we agreed to with you. You can understand why we're trying to get .some assurances that that will get tiled at some point in the future. I know it doesn't exactly meet the definition of contiguous and that's why staff's always interpreted that I think as the easement does touch your property. I'm kind of looking for a little help from you too so we can move forward with approval of this project. Varialle: Councilman Anderson, I appreciate what you're saying and I understand that. I think that we're taking a little bit of a position that, by definition we don't really feel that the Ordinance applies to us. We're looking to find some common ground however though, to solve the problem. We can look at the portion that does -it's not all of that the runs along our west side there's a Meridian City Council Meeting ~ • January 16, 2001 Page 35 portion of it that runs along the west side that does appear to potentially be in question, it could potential fall within the Ordinance. We certainly would not hesitate to look at providing some guarantee there. I would prefer not to use a bond. I would have to look at the dollar amounts I don't know if we can do a cash deal or whatever if we're only talking about the portion. I'm reluctant to accept responsibility for that portion that is definitely off of our property. I think that again we were looking for someway to, perhaps have discussions continue so that we can define these issues a little further. Nichols: President Bird, if I could ask a question. Mr. Varialle, doesn't the easement for the Cresson touch your boundary? Doesn't it come -the south boundary, the Creason Lateral easement does it not touch the northern boundary of this particular parcel? Varialle: It may -does that touch Becky? Bowcutt: Which one? The southern boundary? Bird: That's the (inaudible) of the southern boundary touch your property all the way across? Variall: Does the easement touch our north? Bowcutt: Does it overlap or abut? Nichols: Abut? Bowcutt: I believe it does abut, but not overlap on the north side. On the west side we have slight overlap. Nichols: When you say that part of the ditch is on your property, on the west end of your property, is it the physical ditch or part of the easement that actually goes past your property boundary? Bowcutt: The easement overlaps our property, the ditch appears to run (inaudible) bank at the property line for a certain portion of the western boundary. Nichols: What we're looking at is we have a ditch easement then that runs along the north sides. It abuts the northern boundary of this particular parcel and then coming down the west side would be the eastern edge of the Creason Lateral easement overlaps your property boundary, and the physical ditch also part of the top of the bank comes onto your property you think? Bowcutt: It abuts the property. It looks like it's running -the top of the bank line is running parallel and almost on top of the boundary. It doesn't appear to overlap it just appears to be adjacent to. To the north, the Creason Lateral top of Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 36 bank they're between three and five feet of distance between our north boundary and the top of bank, which would be the south, bound bank of the Cresson. Anderson: Is a letter of credit easier or a (inaudible) obtained in the bond? Nichols: Councilmen Anderson and you asked Mr. Varialle. I think it depends upon the person. For some people either is not a problem and for some - a lot of times the bank wants a deposit equal to the amount of the letter of credit as their security for that letter of credit. If it's a 30,000 dollar letter of credit, they want a $30,000 CD in their bank, which they have access to pull to satisfy the letter of credit if somehow there's a default. Anderson: Somebody that owns a mile of ground I would think (inaudible) what would be able to cover that. Bird: The only problem I see having had to get bonds and .stuff, the bonding company or the letter of credit. Whoever gives you the letter of credit has no more control over getting the property owner to allow you to go in there and put that in as these people do right now. I will be quite shocked, even with the background of these developers, that if they will find a bonding company that will bond to put something else on somebody else's property. Anderson: That's why I suggested the letter of credit. Bird: Letter of credit I think you're going to have the same problem. They've got to have control. If you'll recall, it's like the letter of credit that Cherry Lane Golf Course. They had to control that building even above us if it was forfeited. They come in and they do the job but they've got to be able to get to it. The same as these developers have to get to it and if you don't own that property you can't get to it. Nichols: Councilmen Bird, members of the Council, if I can just interject a little bit here. My interpretation of our Ordinance is different than the developers and I respect his analysis. Where we have an easement, a 60-foot wide easement for an irrigation ditch and where that easement abuts the property I believe that satisfies the Ordinance requirement of being adjacent to. I recognize the problem of how you do something on someone else's property, however, having been through the issue with Nampa Meridian over issue of their easements with regard to licenses for pathways and so forth. They were there on Mount Sinai is the way they approached these things. Maybe Mr. Husky's got them too but it appears to me that if Nampa Meridian says we're going to the this ditch, and this is how we're going to do it, and we've got the engineering and you're still going to get your water that it can be done. At the same time, I think that the developers raised a very legitimate issue and .that is the expense of constructing check structures and things in order to be able to irrigate Mr. Husky's ground in the same way he's done it in the past. Then later on have to tear those things out. It Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 37 would be more appropriate, probably to condition this on some sort of deposit to help cover the cost of tiling the ditch. That property will develop at some point in the future. It might be an underground tiling in order to have some sort of a pressurized irrigation structure for the developed parcels in there rather than to have something that you have to tear out and do it twice. We don't want to create a Curtis Road situation out there on the boundary of this property. Anderson: That's the direction that I'm trying to head. I'm trying to get to the point where we're not going to the the ditch but I want some type of guarantee that later on, when that property in the north does develop that we will the it. So far you guys have shot down bonds and letters of credit do you have any other ideas? Nichols: I'm not saying that we've shot down the bond. I think the question would be how much is the bond, and what is it that we're requiring that the bond be for. If the bond is for payment of up to half of the cost, of tiling, so many feet of this ditch, up to certain point in the future. Whether it be by bond, deposit, letter of credit or some sort of issue that somehow we can find someway to get it done. Mr. Varialle can go ahead and proceed with his development. The City knows that there's security there for payment of up to half during a particular period of time. That, again that you're not -it's certainly half of something, or at least what I've got envisioned here is a lot better than half or even a whole with all of these irrigation structures and so forth and then paying to have them tore out later. I think we're talking about a smaller amount. Anderson: You've all said, Mr. Varialle, Councilmen Bird, and yourself that a bond and a letter of credit isn't an option if the piece of property isn't owned by him. Nichols: I didn't say that, Councilmen Bird did. Bird: I said that. Anderson: I thought I saw your head nod. Nichols: No, I had said that I could see that it may be difficult but I don't think it's impossible. Bird: I don't think anything's impossible. Nichols: The other question is how much is it? That's another factor. The bigger the amount the more nervous the bank gets. Anderson: How big of the do you have to the this ditch with, is it 49 inch? Varialle: I think it's 36. Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 38 Bowcutt: The portion maybe as big as 48 but it's 36 on the western boundary. Bird: What about the northern? Bowcutt: Bill Hanson brought back 48. We've got a meter the water when it comes in the ditch. Bird: Mr. Varialle? Varialle: I was going to offer a suggestion back on the idea that we are bringing in future phases. If there is a way, if it is possible to - we do have a plat for some 300 and some acres coming before you that, as it will be multi-phased. If there is away to attach to that plat this condition. Should something happen to us or someone else buys the ground or whatever, it runs with that land. The plat will be in place and as that plat eventually would be (sic) implemented under any condition there would be an obligation to work with whoever. takes on the Husky ground. Anderson: I understand what you're saying. I guess my question would be to the attorney though is could we put a condition like that on a plat that none of those additional properties are going to touch this thing? That would be questionable in my mind. Varialle: Excuse me Mr. Anderson, it does touch our north boundary. It does touch the north boundary of the phase we have now. Bird: Not (inaudible) that we can't get tiled, the Husky property. You don't own the Husky property. Varialle: That's correct. Bird: Who's going to say that you might have the whole three quarters of a section already developed before they ever decide to develop that property. Varialle: Councilman Bird what I am suggesting is that we put a time in there. Two years, three years, whatever. Bird: What do you make -three years from now what makes you think that Husky's going to be any more agreeable? That's what I'm trying to do, looking from the City standpoint. We can make you get a bond, or we can make you get a letter of credit, but 20 years from now we still might have that. There's nothing to say that Husky's going to ever develop that. That's why I think there's other - I don't know how we tie into the deal. I personally have a problem with making a developer that doesn't have a ditch on his property the it, that's my personal opinion. It's in our Ordinances that we do. Time wise, I don't know how we put a Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 39 time one it. Who's going to say when Husky sells, you guys let's face the fact you have probably tried the (inaudible) with the whole thing. Varialle: That solved the problem. Bird: That solved the problem, Ron that's where I'm coming from how do you put a time on it? Anderson: I don't know. Nichols: Councilmen Bird, members of the Council. One of the things I've thought about is the issue is really safety. If you keep -you put up a fence from the ditch but Nampa Meridian is certainly not going to let you put the-fence inside their easement. It better be at least a half an inch away from the easement. They're not going to like the maintenance issues of having a fence along there and some of those things. There's not a great solution. A fence is an easy one, you put up a fence and it's done. Maybe that's what you do, you have a perimeter fence on this thing and that's how you keep people out of the ditch at least on the northern side of that. What you do on the western edge that's more problematic because of where the ditch runs. I suppose you could just do a five foot offset from the boundary or something and set a fence inside the boundary line along there. There's just not an easy one on this one, there just isn't. Bird: That's what I was wandering Ron is how do we set a time limit on it. There's nothing to say that 10 years from now you'll have any -you might be developed completely around him but that one area would still be - Anderson: I agree, I was thinking that if you did some type of a bond or letter of credit that it would have to have a reassessment at the end of that time frame. Then you would have to look and see what conditions might have changed at that point and then decide whether you wanted to continue that or renew that or let it go. Bird: I have no - De Weerd: It might be easier getting a letter of credit for land that overlaps rather than abuts the easement if it's - I don't know. The north side seems less problematic than the west. Bird: It's quite a ways off the north side of it. De Weerd: None of us are bankers so we any only speculate. Bird: No, we can only speculate. Council any more questions for these people, we can get this wrapped up? Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 40 Anderson: I have none. Bird: Thank you Frank, thank you Becky. Here do you want this? Council you have any questions for staff or anybody, Mr. Anderson? Anderson: Mr. President I guess a question for Legal Counsel. I just have a question, would more time build give us the opportunity to research any further the legal questions about the easement touching the northern boundary of this property and make that any clearer for us? Would there be an advantage in tabling this to allow you some optional time to look at that issue or is it just one of those things that you're never going to have the answer and we just need to make a decision? How do you view it? Nichols: Councilman Anderson, members of the Council, I think we've got a situation where -between the developer at least the developers attorney and my opinion is we're at the, agree to disagree point. Further research on it on my part I don't think is going to change my opinion where that easement actually abuts against this development. In the Development Agreement that's been signed requires all ditches shall be tiled according to 12-4-13. To answer your question I don't think that does us any good or buys us any solution. It would look to me like maybe the compromise deal is you bond for the west ditch and you fence the northern boundary. (Inaudible) in other words you waive the requirement which you have the right to do as to the northern part of it and you bond on the west boundary side and go from there. De Weerd: Sounds like a compromise. Bird: Council any other questions? Anderson: When you say bond are you talking about for three years, as long as we can? ,Nichols: Three years is probably as long as you can. I would probably call it a renewable with an option to renew it another - I guess I would defer that, I don't know if Shari's got an opinion or Gary does on how long we can string this along. My only concern about -you can say yes, you're going to pipe it but my concern is with those check structures and all of that stuff that has to be done. How are you going to -then to have to tear them out later? That is a tremendous waste of materials and money to me even though that we might speculate that that Husky property won't develop in the next 10 or 20 years. It's highly likely that it would. Bird: What's your pleasure Council? Anderson: Mr. President, I guess I will make a-stab at this then. I would make a motion that we approve the Final Plat for 54 building lots and 8 other lots on Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 41 • 19.08 acres in an R-4 zone for Bridgetower Subdivision No. 1 by Primeland Development Co. With the condition that on tiling the ditch that we request that they bond for half of the tiling of the ditch on the west side of the property and construct a fence on the north side of the property to keep pedestrian and traffic from the Cresson Lateral. Instruct the City Attorney to draw up the appropriate Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Decision of Order. I think Bill's pointing his finger at me. One more thing, subject to staff comments and whatever input Bill may have. Bird: Mr. Anderson, before we have a second, strictly a .bond or can they get a letter of credit regarding which is for half of the amount on the west side? You stated a bond, either one? Anderson: Either one is acceptable to me. McCandless: Mr. President would you need a renewable (inaudible) in there? Anderson: On the bond or letter of credit that that be a three year and that be a renewable and that be reviewed at the end of that three years to see the status of the project and the development of the north. Bird: Do I hear a second? Nichols: Councilmen Anderson, I assume that that's the north boundary where it's alongside Mr. Husky not the north boundary to where the developer owns the property on the north side of that. De Weerd: I'll second it. Bird: Discussion? We've had a motion made and seconded for approval of the Final Plat for 54 building lots for Primeland Development Company, Bridgetower Subdivision No. 1 with stipulations stated in the motion. Mr. Clerk, Roll-call vote. Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Anderson: I just wanted to thank Becky for bringing all of those issues up, we appreciate it. McCandless: We really enjoyed this. Anderson: Do you stay up late at night dreaming these up? De Weerd: We've noticed you've gotten very informal lately though. Meridian City Council Meeting ~ • January 16, 2001 Page 42 Anderson: We love to have you. Item 14. Ordinance No. 01-901: RZ-00-006 Request for Rezone of 7.14 acres from I-L to C-G for the Meridian Business Park by Donald Asbell -East Franklin Road and North Baltic Place: Bird: Item No. 14 is Ordinance No. 01-901. Request for Rezone of 7.14 acres from I-L to C-G for the Meridian Business Park by Donald Asbell. Clerk would you please read the Ordinance 01-901 by title only? Berg: Thank you Mr. President, Ordinance No. 01-901: An Ordinance finding that Donald R. Asbell and Annette Asbell are the owners of certain real property has made a written request for a rezone of the zoning classification for real property north of Franklin Road, west of North Baltic Place Meridian, Idaho, that lies within the boundaries of the City of Meridian from I-L, light-industrial zoning district, to C-G, general-retail and service commercial district as defined under Meridian code section 11-7-2(k); repealing all Ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict here with; and directing the. City Engineer to add said rezoning designation to official maps of the City of Meridian, Idaho. Bird: Would anybody in the audience like to have Ordinance No. 01-901 read in its entirety? Seeing none, Council, I entertain a motion. Anderson: Mr. President, I would make a motion that we approve Ordinance No. 01-901, a rezone request for 7.14 acres from I-L to C-G for the Meridian Business park by Donald Asbell -East Franklin Road and North Baltic Place with suspension of the rules. McCandless: Second. Bird: Motion made to approve Ordinance No. 01-901 and seconded. Roll-call vote, Mr. Clerk, please. Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 15. Public Hearing: VAR 00-025 Variance of the lot width from 80 feet to approximately 79 feet for the four lots at the west side of Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 6 by Pinnacle Engineers - Ustick Road and North Linder Road: Bird: Next is a Public Hearing regarding a variance of lot width from 80 feet to approximately 79 feet for the four lots at the west side of Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 6 by Pinnacle Engineers - Ustick Road. Council, I believe before we open the public hearing, we got today on our deal -- we received from Meridian City Council Meeting • January 16, 2001 Page 43 Pinnacle Engineering a letter, which I don't believe -has staff had a chance to see this? Stiles: Yes. Bird: With that, I'll open the Public Hearing and staff report Stiles: Mr. President, Council, this is for four lots within the proposed Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 6 that a variance of the lot width from 80 feet to between 78 and 79 feet and you have the applicants- explanation of how that occurred. We have been told that the lots will still meet the minimum square footage requirement of 8,000 square feet. They had submitted the. No. 6 for Final Plat approval but because those lots did not meet the Ordinance requirement we did not process that application. The Preliminary Plat they did meet the 80-foot minimum requirement and then they go to the Final Plat stage and they're explanation is that a previous phase had a bigger lot than was shown on the Preliminary Plat. I'm not sure this meets the evidence required for a variance, as it's not really anything to do with the topography of the land or the physical limitations of the property. However staff would not object to granting this variance, put the applicant and his representative on notice that future proposals for variances similar to this would not be supported by staff. Bird: Thank you Shari. Any questions for Shari? Anderson: I have none. Bird: Is the applicant here? Boyle: City Council members, Clint Boyle with Pinnacle Engineers, 12552 West Executive in Boise. I'm here representing the applicants, Stubblefield Development, or the developer on this particular site. Before I get started here I do have just two exhibits that I would like to submit that graphically show how this request came about. The first one is the Preliminary Plat in the area in question that was previously approved. The second exhibit that I'll submit is the Final Plat for Tumble Creek Phase 1, which has already been approved by this Council as well as Tumble Creek No. 6 which has yet to come before this Council. Again, Tumble Creek No. 6 is the Final Plat that has the lots in question. Essentially I believe that Shari did a good job representing the facts behind how this occurred. Originally, if you'll look at the bottom of the page, Ihave -- she had indicated as Preliminary Plat and then the other item as the Final Plats. On the Preliminary Plat I've highlighted the lot in question that was the lot that has potentially caused an issue with the frontage dimensions on the four lots that we're requesting the variance on. That is lot 4 of block 9 and originally on the Preliminary Plat that lot was shown with approximately 81 feet of street frontage. However when Tumble Creek Division No. 1 was approved, the lot frontage was represented as approximately 85 feet. Therefore in this later phase, Tumble Creek No. 6, on Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 44 these four lots it has caused an issue of not being able to meet the minimum lot frontage requirements on those four lots. Essentially that is I guess the issue and we would certainly agree with Shari that we don't like to present variances in front of the Council. The original Final Plat was prepared by a .different engineering firm and I guess essentially we're left to clean up an item that was done previously. I appreciate the fact that we would be on notice. We certainly are agreeable to that because we don't plan on presenting variances often at all. Again just to kind of clarify, without the variance -let me back up on the Preliminary Plat as far as the approval that is in place, this variance request does not increase the number of lots nor the density of the overall subdivision. In other words, this is in compliance with the number of lots that were approved on the Preliminary Plat. We're not trying to squeeze another lot into the subdivision. It's mainly just an error that we're trying to clean up. One other item that I will point out at this point in time is that the developer has worked with the City with regards to the subdivision. There has been a lot that has been deeded to the City for their purposes and use. I guess in hindsight now, had we realized this error at the time, maybe we could have negotiated to allow them to pick up the remainder if we had 3 lots with 80 frontage and then a remainder of 76 foot let's say. That's somewhat in hindsight but I guess this evening we just would ask the Council to approve this variance based on the fact that now we are constrained by previous divisions of this development that have been approved. We would certainly be on notice with further variances on frontages. If there's any questions I would be happy to answer those and like I mentioned the developer is in attendance and could field questions as well. Anderson: Where's this lot that was deeded to the City and what was it for? Boyle: That's one that John Stubblefield, the developer, could probably respond to you better than I could. Stubblefield: John Stubblefield, 641 Franklin. The lot that has been deeded to the City, I'll walk over and point to it. It will come with the approval of this last phase. It's in the area approximately where Shari has the cursor there. It's part of this approval. There's a secondary main entrance that will be coming off of Linder right in that area, and just to the south of that main entrance we've dedicated a lot to the City for a well lot.. Bird: Thank you. Anderson: So that's Linder Road? Bird: Yes. Stubblefield: Correct. Bird: Any more questions Council? Meridian City Council Meeting • • January 16, 2001 Page 45 Anderson: No. Bird: Thank you very much. Stubblefield: Thank you. Bird: Anybody else in the public like to testify? Council, seeing no more testimony before we entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing is there any questions now for staff or the developer that we need to ask that you have? Seeing none I would entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing. Anderson: So moved. McCandless: Second. Bird: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Bird: Council what's your pleasure? De Weerd: Mr. President, I move that we approve the variance request 00-025 for the lot width of 80 feet to approximately 79 feet. For the four lots at the west side of Tumble Creek Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers and to have the attorney draw up the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Decision of Order. Bird: Do I hear a second? McCandless: Second. Bird: Motions been made and seconded to approve the variance on the lot width for 80 feet to approximately 79 feet for 4 lots on the west side of Tumble Creek Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers. Roll-call vote, Mr. Clerk. Anderson: Hey what happened to the discussion? Bird: Discussion? I'm sorry, I'm getting ahead of myself. Anderson: I just wanted to make a couple of comments and kind of echo what Shari said. I know our Ordinance says that 8,000 square foot is a minimum. I guess what I see here in this development is that they took that literally and 80 by 100 and it doesn't leave you any room for air. It's kind of like a good lesson to me. It's kind of like the guy that comes in at one minute before 8:00 every day. You ought to leave yourself a little wiggle room in future developments in case Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 46 there is an error. As our Ordinance also talks bout for variance there needs to be overwhelming support that this cause some type of financial hardship and I don't see it in this case other than this was a human error on the part of somebody doing some measurements. I just kind of wanted to echo what Shari's saying, I strongly would suggest that you not make a habit of this and that you try to give yourself a little bit of room in future developments so that they're not that close. De Weerd: Very nicely stated. Bird: Any more discussion? Mr. Clerk would you Roll-call vote? Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 16. FP 00-026 Final Plat approval for 48 building lots and 3 other lots for Tumble Creek .Subdivision No. 5 by Pinnacle Engineers - Ustick and North Linder Roads: Bird: Item No. 16 is the Final Plat approval for 48 building lots and 3 other lots for Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 5. Also Council, we had a thing on our deal before us, tonight when we got here regarding this item. Shari have you seen this? Stiles: Yes I have. Bird: Shari do you want to bring us up to date and give you a recommendation? Stiles: Mr. President, Council, you have our comments dated January 12, 2001 and also a memo from Gary Smith dated January 15, 2001. The applicant's representative has responded to our comments. They furnished the information we had requested. They've indicate they will provide closure table to show that the lots do meet the minimum 8, 000 there's some that are squeaking by, maybe. They have suggested some modifications they may make to meet the minimum frontage requirements. On Item No. 1, on the second No. 1 of the applicant's response regarding the Flood Plane. I was not aware that the Flood Planes could not be shown that the County has changed their opinion on whether those should be shown on a plat. However we would ask the applicant to supply us with a plat, with the fima Flood Plane superimposed on the plat map as it's -the fima Flood Plane maps we get it's almost impossible to determine where those flood planes are because of the scale of them. We would like to, if you have that information available to provide us with that information. On the second page, Item 2, the applicant's representative may not be aware of how frontages are calculated. On these lots that show -these are also two of the lots that their proposing to take two feet off of to make the other lots meet the frontage requirements. The frontage of a lot is taken with the line length and half of this Meridian City Council Meeting • January 16, 2001 Page 47 line length for a corner lot. That results in less than the 80-foot minimum frontage. ff you put those arrows on there, they can face the houses that way that would be their frontage and it certainly would be more desirable to have their garages coming in off of the other direction. That's one solution if you wanted to get rid of those driveways. Under Item 3, I wasn't sure if Gary would have a chance to go over this and that's why the comment for my Item 14 just to make sure that someone from engineering had a chance to review it. I believe Gary Smith has addressed any concerns of the Public Works and Building Department. We would ask that you approve the plat of Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 5 with staff and agency comments. Bird: Any questions for staff, applicant? Boyle: Again, Clint Boyle with Pinnacle Engineers. I'm in agreement with Shari on everything that she just stated. That's fine, as far as those different items that we discussed, we're not contending with any of those. On the frontages, that was just a clarification item. Unfortunately our understanding was the City offices were closed over the Martin Luther King holiday so we weren't able to contact anybody to discuss that but we did come to an understanding on those frontages this morning with the staff. I appreciate that and we'll keep that in mind, future phases. Again the only items that we had question with was on memo Item No. 11 and this is the Meridian Staff Memo with the fima Flood Plane issue. We certainly don't have any problem providing an exhibit or a plat overlay blue line to the City to Shari showing that designation. Essentially it affects one lot, and that lot I don't have a pointer. It's lot 24 in the right hand corner that's up against the Five-Mile Creek drainage. There's a small portion of that that is within the Flood Plane designation. That would be the only lot in the entire division that would be affected by a Flood Plane and we can show where that crosses that lot. The other item I guess that was a little bit unclear to us was it was also stated that development and I forget how It's phrased in the staff report under 11 but it would require a Conditional Use Permit. Any structures proposed within 100 year Flood Plane require a Conditional Use Permit. Maybe that's something that Shari can clarify because our understanding was that that dealt with structures within the Flood Way rather than the Flood Plane. Stiles: (Inaudible) your Flood Plane? Boyle: Requires Conditional Use Permit. Stiles: Yes. Boyle: Rather than just an elevation permit on the structure? Stiles: We're working on changing that but unfortunately that's what our Ordinance reads. There's a Flood Plane overlay district and that includes everything within the 100 year Flood Plane. Not the 500-year Flood Plane but Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 48 any structures within the 100-year Flood Plane are required a Conditional Use Process. As large as that lot is I can't imagine -- if it's just a portion of it it's probably not going to affect you. Boyle: Okay, that was just an item of clarification and I don't recall if that item was part of the approval on the other 3 lots that abut the Five-Mile drainage. We'll comply with that if that is a requirement. In the final one that we went through, I guess that we would just like removed or struck from the comments was Item No. 14, of the staff comments, which was the last item in the response that I gave. Essentially that was just one of the provisions of approval was that Bruce Freckleton would be allowed to make additional changes once he had an opportunity to review the plat. We would certainly rather have it -- condition upon the memo that Gary Smith submitted and have that provision of the staff comments removed I guess would be our request. So that it's not left up to Bruce to make changes to our plat after we receive or hopefully receive approval from the City Council. I would be happy to answer any questions. Bird: Any questions Council? Thank you Mayor very much. Council any discussion? I would entertain a motion then. McCandless: Mr. President, I move that we approve the Final Plat No. 00-026 for 48 building lots and 3 other lots for Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 5 and I'm lost. Instruct the City Attorney to draw up the proper papers including staff comments. Bird: Does that include this memo? Gary Smith's memo of January 15, 2001 regarding to provide the elements of not having - McCandless: He made the comments for the Engineering Department, yes. Bird: Deleting 14. McCandless: Deleting 14. De Weerd: Second. Bird: Been moved and seconded to approve the Final Plat for 48 building lots and 3 other lots for Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 5, any discussion? Hearing none, Roll-call vote, Mr. Clerk. Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 17. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 49 Bird: Item No. 17 which we added is a delinquency for turnoff scheduled for January 24, 2001 this is for trash, water and sewer. This is to inform you, in writing, if you choose to, you may have the right to apre-determination hearing at 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, January 16, 2001, before the mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and to defend the claim made by this City that your water, sewer and trash be delinquent. You may retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on January 24, 2001, unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash delinquency? They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Forth Judicial District Court pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn-off list is $56,093.17. Nichols: Just for the record you need to state on the tape that there was no one present to appear in - Bird: I'm sorry. Anderson: He's back in Washington DC. Bird: There was nobody here to protest their delinquency turnoff. With that I would entertain a motion to approve the delinquency shutoff. McCandless: Mr. President, so moved. Anderson: Second. Bird: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 18. Election of Officers: Bird: Isn't that a lot of money? Council before we go any farther we need to elect our President and Vice President for the City Council for this coming year. I would entertain nominations for President. De Weerd: I would like to nominate Keith Bird for President. Bird: Do we hear a second. McCandless: I second it. De Weerd: That's of City Council not of the United States. Meridian City Council Meeting January 16, 2001 Page 50 • Bird: Any other nominations? If hearing none I will close nominations, all in favor? Now for Vice President of the City Council? McCandless: Mr. President, I nominate Ron Anderson for Vice President. Bird: Do I hear a second? De Weerd: Second. Bird: Any other nominations? Hearing none, all in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Bird: I guess we're re-elected for another year. We'll discuss and the next meeting have our assignments for our deal if that's okay with everybody. I think Cherie's got something that she would like to - Item 19. Executive Session 67-2345(e): McCandless: Mr. President I would like to request a short Executive Session under 67-2345(e) to consider matters of Commerce. Bird: Do I hear a second. Anderson: Second. Bird: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES (Regular meeting reconvened at 10:34 p.m.) Bird: We came out of the Executive Session; nothing decided. I need a motion to come out of it. McCandless: So moved. Bird: Do I hear a second? Anderson: Second. Bird: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES De Weerd: You need to state that no decisions were made. Meridian City Council Meeting• January 16, 2001 Page 51 Bird: No decisions were made. McCandless: He did. Bird: I did when I first said it. De Weerd: Sorry. • Bird: If there's no further business, I would entertain a motion to adjourn. McCandless: So moved. Anderson: Second. Bird: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:35 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPRO~f ED: 1 OB RT D. CORRIE, MAYOR ~,~~~~E~~t'Ya'~'~'tfr~ilyr~~~ ,~` Cr`~ ~:~ot~,i -`. j A ~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., TY CLERK i BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL C/C 1-16-00 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF GEM STAR PROPERTIES., LLC, FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDMSION NO. 1 LOCATED SOUTH OF USTICK ROAD AND WEST OF BLACK CAT ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO CASE NO. FP-00-02 6 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to Meridian City Code § 12-3-7 on December 5, 2000, and tabled until December 19, 2000, and tabled until January 2, 2001, and tabled until January 16, 2001, and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete which has included certain comments and conditions from Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, °~hich are herein found fair and reasonable, and that Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, commented at the hearing, and Susan Wildwood testified on behalf of the Applicant, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF -- PAGE 1 OF 4 FINAL PLAT F:OR AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION NO. 1 BY: GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC (FP-00-026) ~ • IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The revised Final Plat of "AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION NO. 1" as evidenced in Plat bearing the File name: "AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION NO. 1, A PART OF THE NE 1/4 NE 1/4, SECTION 4, T.3N., R. 1W., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2001, EARL SL ASSOCIATES, INC., CALDWELL, IDAHO, AU0800FP, Sheet 1 of 2, and stamped RECEIVED JAN 12 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE, EARL &ASSOCIATES, INC. -CONSULTING ENGINEER", GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC, Developer", is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments from Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, and Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, dated December 1, 2000, listing 18 Site Specific Comments and 7 General Comments, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of four pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, and with the additional requirements as follows, to-wit: 1.1 Meridian Fire Chief, Denny Bowers, requires that all common lots shall be kept clear of trash and weeds. All road and street name signs shall be installed before construction is started. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF -- PAGE 2 OF 4 FINAL PLAT FOR AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION NO. 1 BY: GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC (FP-00-026) • • 1.2 Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District reserves comments pending the agreement and contract for the storm water discharge and pressure urban irrigation. 1.3 The Central District Health Department requires after written approval from the appropriate entities are submitted, they can approve this proposal for central sewage and central water; that plans must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality for central sewage and central water; that run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem; and it is suggested that stormwater be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality; that engineers and architects should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals for guidance: 1.3.1 State of Idaho Catalog Of stormwater Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities And Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division Of Environmental Quality, July 1997. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF -- PAGE 3 OF 4 FINAL PLAT FOR AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION NO. 1 BY: GEM STAR. PROPERTIES, LLC (FP-00-026) • • 1.3.2 Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, January 1997. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: a. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and b. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the /6~`'~ day of ~(~~~~ , 2001. L c~j~ By: Gish r~ -1~l~par City of Meridian ~`'~1 C;o to Kc~ (h~~Se~`~Ce~.~- Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department and the Public Works D partment. ````,~~,,~~tii,t~~lR~ar~rij~r,, ~ Dated: ~~l ~ Q~ ~~'~`~~~~ ~o~r '~'~~'` A,~, B A *. ~j~ ity Clerk ~ ~ Sr msg\Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Autumn Faire Sub AZ and PP\Order FP ~' ~jL .Y' ~ ~ 1~~~ ~ tiF ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF -- PAGE 4 OF 4 '+,+9~n~;~``r ~s~ _ ,~~ rr FINAL PLAT FOR AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION NO. 1 '~~,,,b~.'~~f..,~ ,~,,;•"' ,.~ BY: GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC (FP-00-026) ''~ `°'~ I~ ~ -1 G M ALLEY HLB OF TRE~ISURE ~ . ~Ir1Y'OR A Good Place to Live ~ Rolx~rt D. Come CITY OF MERIDIAN ~ ~ ~ "° ~ CITY COUNCIL ~tEb(BERS 33 EAST IDAHO I ~~ ~ V [~ ~ g Ron Andclson ~z;cl, sirs MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 I Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-=1433 - FA.Y (208) 887-4813 _ City Clerk Office Fay: (208) 888218 DEPARTMENT Cherie ~[cCandless (208) 884-5533 • F.aY 888-6854 MEMORANDUM: December 1, ?000 To: Mayor & City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineerc~ Shan Stiles, Planning & Zoning Administrator Re: Request for a Final Plat Approval of Autumn Faire Subdivision No. 1 - 47 Single- family Buildmg Lots on 14.93 Acres in an R-4 Zone by Gem Star Properties, LLC (File# FP-00-0201 We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: LOCATION AND SURROUNDING USES The property is generally located at the southwest corner of Black Cat Road and Ustick Road. North -Several large, unplatted parcels currently being used for agriculture, zoned RT in Ada County. South -One single-family residence on approximately 2.6 acres, zoned RT in Ada County, south of which is Turnberry Subdivision. East -Ashford Greens Subdivision, zoned R-4 in Meridian, is directly across Black Cat. West -Several large, unplatted parcels currently being used for agriculture, zoned R-T in Ada County. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS 1. Applicant is to meet all terms of the approved preliminary plat and development agreement. 2. Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. The applicant shall be required to provide a backup source to the pressurized irrigation system If a well or surface source is not available, a single point connection to the City of Meridian's domestic water system will be allowed for the development but not for the park area due to its size. In the event that domestic water is used as a backup source, common areas within the development will be a subject to City of Meridian water assessments. Payment of water assessment fees for the common areas is required prior to city signatures on the final plat map. 3. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all lots receiving engineered backfill. 4. The design of drainage areas shall ensure that water is retained only during 25-year storm events for a period of time not to exceed Z4 hours. r-P-oo-ozo Autumn Faire Subdivision No. 1 • Mayor and Council December 1, 2000 Page 2 5. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized irrigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constructed, fencing installed, and road base approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to applying for budding permits. All development improvements shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 6. Applicant shall be responsible to construct a temporary trash containment fencing around the outside perimeter of this subdivision, except where the City has expressly agreed, in writing, that such fencing is not necessary. Fencing is to be in place prior to applying for building permits. 7. Please add or revise the following notes: (1.) ...blanket 3e$-ate- drainage easement in favor of the Ada County Highway District. Landscape over said easement shall be maintained by the homeowners association. (5.) Building setbacks and dimensional standards in this subdivision shall conform to the applicable zoning regulations m-e~eet ~* *'•° *~-~° °~ *"° ••'-a~•T°ia~-of the City of Meridian. (7.) ...Idaho Code 31-3805, concerning ~gation water. (8.) ...living space, exclusive of garage. (9.) ...highest known sease~al normal groundwater elevation. (I1.) The owner of each lot, across which passes an irrigation/drainage ditch or pipe, is responsible for the maintenance thereof, unless such responsibility has been assumed by an irrigation/drainage district. (12.) This sudivision is subiect to the terms of a development agreement recorded as Instrument No. ,records of Ada County, Idaho. 8. Add an arrow symbol to .the plat legend that depicts front of house orientation. Place symbol on Lot 1, Block 14, toward Willowside Avenue; on Lots 11 and 12, Block 7, towazd Willowside Avenue; on Lot 10, Block 6, towazd Willowside Avenue; Lot 14, Block 13, towazd Willowside Avenue; Lot 2, Block 2, towazd Autumn Faire Way; Lots 1 and 22, Block 8, towazd Autumn Faire Way; Lot 1, Block 6, toward Valleygreen Avenue; and Lot 1, Block 7, towazd Valleygreen Avenue. Although some of these lots show "FRONT" on the lots, the arrow symbol and designation on the legend as Front of House should be more readily understandable by buyers and homebuilders. 9. Lot 1, Block 7, is a marginal lot that does not appear to be buildable. Provide a building envelope to show how a minimum 1,400 square foot home can be built on this lot with atwo- car garage. This lot would be better suited as a landscape lot due to its location and configuration. FP-00-021 Bear Creek Subdivision No. 1 ~ w Mayor and Council December 1, 2000 Page 3 10. Lot 18, Block 7, and Lot 2, Block 6, do not meet the minimum 80-foot frontage requirement for the R-4 zone. Revise plat to conform. Staff will not support a variance to the frontage requirement for these lots. 11. What is the purpose of providing 60 feet of right-of--way for Autumn Faire Way? Ada County Highway District did not designate this road a collector. If the road were a collector, no front- on housing would be allowed. This road should be designed to the appropriate standard within the appropriate right-of--way. 12. Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via a temporary lift station in the Ashford Greens development. The developer shall enter into an operation and maintenance agreement with the City of Meridian. Applicant will be responsible to construct lateral sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Once the Black Cat Sanitary Sewer Trunk fee is established and approved by the Meridian City Council, such fees would be applied to each building permit issued in this development. The current estimated fee is $1,500.00 per lot. 13. Water service to this site will be via extensions of existing mains installed in adjacent developments, as well as from the new domestic well site within this development. Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. 14. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that all street finish centerline elevations aze set a minimum of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. 15. Sidewalks are to provide a clear five-foot-wide walkway pathway without encroachment of mailbox structures. 16. The surveyor shall stamp, sign and date the face of the plat. 17. All lots within this development shall be subject to the applicable latecomers fees on the existing Ashford Greens sanitary sewer lift station and water main extension. Payment of all applicable latecomers fees for this phase shall be required prior to signature on the final plat. 18. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved preliminary plat does not relieve Applicant of responsibility for compliance. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the azea being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. FP-00-02I Bear Creek Subdivision No. I Mayor and Council December 1, 2000 Page 4 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Two-hundred-fifty watt and One-hundred-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations aze at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity aze determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. Street light contractor to obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 4. Submit "Final" letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 5. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent. 6. Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. 7. Submit three copies of the revised Final Plat Map to the Public Works Department for compliance review prior to development plan approval. FP-00-021 Bear Creek Subdmsion No. 1 .~ ~ CCJNtT7Y ARS5E~pA~CCQ~RrrD~~R J. ~±h~1~~y ~MYt+I Ct~V. 2C~i FE -1 P~ ~~ G9 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Gemstar Properties, L.L.C., Owner/Developer F' ~ ~ .~.~...._._ C r r,.~........ ,. ~~~~~~~~ THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), is made and entered into this 2ND day of ~Cl ycu urt~, 200, by and between CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called "CITY", and GEMSTAR, PROPERTIES, L.L.C., hereinafter called "OWNER"/"DEVELOPER", whose address is 228 East Plaza Street, PMB 211, Eagle, Idaho 83616. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, "Owner" is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the "Property"; and 1.2 WHEREAS, I.C. §67-651. lA, Idaho Code, provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of re-zoning that the owner or "Owner/Developer" make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject "Property"; and 1.3 WHEREAS, "City" has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Ordinance 11-15 -12 and 11-16-4 A, which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, "Owner/Developer" has submitted an application for annexation and zoning of the "Property"s described in Exhibit A, and has requested a designation of Low Density Residential District (R-4), (Meridian City Code §§ 11-7-2 C); and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 1 s ~ 1.5 WHEREAS, "Owner/Developer" made representations at the public hearings both before the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission and before the Meridian City Council, as to how the subject "Property" will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS, record of the proceedings for the requested annexation and zoning designation of the subject "Property" held before the Planning SL Zoning Commission, and subsequently before the City Council, include responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and received further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS, City Council, the _ day of , 2000, has approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order, set forth in Exhibit B, which are attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, hereinafter referred to as (the "Findings"); and 1.8 WHEREAS, both the "Findings" require the "Owner/Developer" to enter into a development agreement before the City Council takes final action on annexation and zoning designation; and 1.9 "DEVELOPER" deems it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and requests; and 1.10 WHEREAS, "City" requires the "Owner/Developer" to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the "Property" is developed and the subsequent use of the "Property" is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this development agreement, herein being established as a result of evidence received by the "City" in the proceedings for annexation and zoning DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 2 • • designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure annexation and zoning designation is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance #629, January 4, 1994, and the Zoning and Development Ordinances codified in Meridian City Code Title 11 and Title 12. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for, unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 "CITY": means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal Corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 "DEVELOPER": means and refers to Gemstar Properties, L.L.C., whose address is 228 East Plaza Street, PMB 211, Eagle, Idaho 83616, the party developing said "Property" and shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s) of the "Property". 3.3 "OWNER": means and refers to .Gemstar Properties, L.L.C., whose address is 228 East Plaza Street, PMB 211, Eagle, Idaho 83616, the owner of said "Property" and shall include any subsequent owner(s) of the "Property". DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 3 • ~ 3.4 "PROPERTY": means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of "Property" located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under "City"'s Zoning Ordinance codified at Meridian City Code Sections 11-7-2 C which are herein specified as follows: ~R-4) Low Density Residential District: Only single- family dwellings shall be permitted and no conditional uses shall be permitted except for planned residential development and public schools. The purpose of the R-4 District is to permit the establishment of low density single-family dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominantly residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible nonresidential uses. The R-4 District allows for a maximum of four (4) dwelling units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal water and sewer systems of the City. With the further restriction that all uses and development of the subject real property shall be governed under the conditional use permit process as a planned development. For the construction and development of a single family residential subdivision. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 4 • 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.A "Developer"/"Owner" shall enter into a Development Agreement, that provides in the event the conditions therein are not met by the Developer that the property shall be subject to de-annexation, with the City of Meridian which provides for the following conditions of development to-wit: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 5.1 Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped shall be shown on the site plans. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Worlcs Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 5.2 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for nondomestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 5.3 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance (Ord. 11-13). 5.4 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer shall be required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 5 ~ • 5.5 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C. and 2-5-2.M. 5.6 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance (Ord. 11-14). No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs shall be permitted. 5.7 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance (Ord. 12-5-2.I~). 5.8 Applicant shall be required to dedicate a site near the northeast corner of the development for a new City well. 5.9 Once the Black Cat Sanitary Sewer Trunk fee is established and approved by the Meridian City Council, such fees shall be applied to each building permit issued in this development. The current estimated fee is $1,500.00 per lot. 5.10 All lots within this development shall be subject to the applicable latecomers fees on the existing Ashford Greens sanitary sewer lift station and water main extension. 5.11 The well lot shall be designated access to the north parcel and access to the southeast quarter. The out parcels shall be annexed. 5.12 Applicant shall be required to donate a minimum 30 foot pathway that shall be required to be rough graded at the developer's expense. In order to accommodate the 30 foot pathway the lots along the south boarder of the subdivision that are along the pathway may be shortened in depth by 10 feet. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 6 ~' 5.13 Construction materials and type of fencing along the pathway shall be subject to the Parks and Recreation Department and Planning and Zoning Department's approval. 5.14 Applicant shall provide a letter of credit, in the sum of the value of the proposed park land based on the actual acreage and the applicant's purchase price. The surety shall be provided upon approval of the final plat for Phase 1 of Autumn Faire. It shall be exercisable by the City in the event that three years elapse from the approval of the preliminary plat for Autumn Faire, and the park land or substitute property has not been transferred to the City. 5.15 The surety shall become void upon transfer of the proposed park land or substitute property in Phase 5 to the City of Meridian. 5.16 The City shall waive park fees associated with Autumn Faire. 5.17 Applicant shall transfer the park land to the City upon approval of the final plat for Phase 5 of the project. 5.18 Applicant shall provide stubbed street, sewer and water to the proposed park as part of the construction of Phase 5 of the project. 5.19 Upon approval of the final plat of Phase Five, applicant will donate land for a public park, 6.8 acres or more in size, in what is part of proposed Autumn Faire II. The value of this land is $204,000.00. 5.20 As a condition of approval of Phases One and Two of Autumn Faire Subdivision, the applicant will post a letter of credit with the City in the amount of $204,000.00. This letter of credit will be in lieu of park impact fees for Phases One through Five of Autumn Faire. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 7 • • 5.21 If, at approval of the final plat of Phase Five, applicant does not deed the 6.8 acre park to the City, and if the applicant fails to provide 6.8 acres or more of park space in Phases Three, Four or Five of Autumn Faire, or if more than three years elapse after adoption of these Findings and the park site has not been donated, then, the letter of credit shall be exercisable in favor of the City. If the 6.8 acre park site is donated as represented by the applicant within three years of the date of adoption of these Findings, the letter of credit shall become void. 5.22 Applicant, at its expense, will provide stubbed street, sewer and water to any proposed park site during construction of Phase Five of Autumn Faire. 5.23 Applicant agrees, at City's option, to provide rough and fine grading of the park site. City shall reimburse applicant for the unit cost (but not move in, move out, or mobilization costs) of the rough and fine grade work done on the park site. 6. COMPLIANCE PERIOD/ CONSENT TO REZONE: This Agreement and the commitments contained herein shall be terminated, and the zoning designation reversed, upon a default of the "Developer"/"Owner" or "Developer"'s/"Owner's" heirs, successors, assigns, to comply with Section 6 entitled "Conditions Governing Development of subject "Property" of this agreement within two years of the date this Agreement is effective, and after the "City" has complied with the notice and hearing procedures as outlined in I.C. § 67-6509, or any subsequent amendments or recodifications thereof. 7. CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION "Developer"/"Owner" consents upon default to the de-annexation and/or a reversal of the zoning designation of the "Property" subject to and conditioned upon the following conditions precedent to-wit: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 8 • • 7.1 That the "City" provide written notice of any failure to comply with this Agreement to "Developer"/"Owner" and if the "Developer"/"Owner" fails to cure such failure within six (6) months of such notice. 8. INSPECTION: "Developer"/"Owner" shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the "Property" as required by this agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement and all other ordinances of the "City" that apply to said Development. 9. DEFAULT: 9.1 In the event "Developer"/"Owner", "Developer"'s/"Owner's" heirs, successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the "Property" or any other person acquiring an interest in the "Property", fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the "Property", this Agreement may be modified or terminated by the "City" upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 9.2 A waiver by "City" of any default by "Developer"/"Owner" of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the breach and breaches waived and shall not bar any other rights or remedies of "City" or apply to any subsequent breach of any such or other covenants and conditions. 10. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: "City" shall record either a memorandum of this Agreement or this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, at "Developer"'s/"Owner's" cost, and submit proof of such recording to "Developer"/"Owner", prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the "Property" by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 9 • • fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the "Property" contemplated hereby, the "City" shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 11. ZONING: "City" shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the "Property" as specified herein. 12. REMEDIES: This Agreement shall be enforceable in any court of competent jurisdiction by either "City" or "Developer"/"Owner", or by any successor or successors in title or by the assigns of the parties hereto. Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the specific performance of the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein. . 12.1 In the event of a material breach of this Agreement, the parties agree that "City" and "Developer"/"Owner" shall have thirty (30) days after delivery of notice of said breach to correct the same prior to the non-breaching party's seeking of any remedy provided for herein; provided, however, that in the case of any such default which cannot with diligence be cured within such thirty (30) day period, if the defaulting party shall commence to cure the same within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter shall prosecute the curing of same with diligence and continuity, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 12.2 In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either "Developer"/"Owner" or "City" is delayed for causes which are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes,- the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 10 ~ • 13. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The "City" may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under Meridian City Code §12-5-3, to insure that installation of the improvements, which the "Developer" agrees to provide, if required by the "City". 14. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: The "Developer"/"Owner" agrees that no Certificates of Occupancy will be issued until all improvements are completed, unless the "City" and "Developer"/"Owner" have entered into an addendum agreement stating when the improvements will be completed in a phased developed; and in any event, no Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed, completed, and accepted by the "City". 15. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That "Developer"/"Owner" agrees to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian and the "Property" shall be subject to de-annexation if the owner or his assigns, heirs, or successors shall not meet the conditions contained in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, this Development Agreement, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. 16. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: c/o City Engineer City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Gemstar Properties, L.L.C. 228 East Plaza Street, PMB 211 Eagle, Idaho 83616 with copy to: City Clerk City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 11 • • Meridian, ID 83642 16.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 17. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 18. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 19. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including "City"'s corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the owner of the "Property", each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the "Property". Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the "Property", or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefitted and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. "City" agrees, upon written request of "Developer", to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if "City", in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that "Developer" has fully performed its obligations under this Agreement. 20. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 12 s • deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 21. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between "Owner/Developer" and "City" relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between "Owner/Developer" and "City", other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to "City", to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of "City". 21.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing development of the subject "Property" herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the ""City" has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 22. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective on the date the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the "Property" and execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 13 • • ACIQVOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and Made it effective as hereinabove provided. GEMSTAR PROPERTIES, L.L.C.. OWNER/DEVELOPER BY: Me er Attest: Member BY RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF MERIDIAN BY: l T/ b ~` e~ ~~ /J'i~-aC - ,~rt,f~~le~t- ~~~ Cm~n~ Attest: / "i City Clerlc ~~~1~~ f ~~"" 'Q 4 ., ~,' ~. ~ ~ ~~ `~ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 14 • STATE OF IDAHO COUNTY OF ADA :ss • ~~ 2ao~ On this ~~~ day of (~'~~~ ~, in the year ~A66, before me, ~, tv/~%r2~ Notary Public; personally appeared "j2-~V~v( -~'Q,I~~.f` and , known or identified to me to be the Members of Gemstar Properties, L.L.C., who executed the instrument on behalf of said Limited Liability Corporation and acknowledged to me having executed the same. •~oO°~e~ •~ ~o • O .~, ~ ~ ~ ~N^ (sue-) : ~; ~ ~ ~ ;°~; ': ?,9 ~LiC; p ;~ • •.~OFIDQes~ ~a~a~~~o STATE OF IDAHO ~~ Notary bli r Id o Commission expires: ~l'Z6 "©~ :ss County of Ada ) 2CC On this ~~ day of ~1a~1/L~-~'~' , in the year 2668, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared "-'-- -` '-'. ~'~°°~~ and William G. Berg, know or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerlc, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the sam: ~~~~"••~e~ y4?- O T*4.~ ~. (SEAL) :~; ~ ~ ~' ~~: . . . . . o ••...... ,1 Notary Pu or Idaho Commission expires: ~'~'~ ~ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 15 • • EXHIBIT A Legal Description Of Property A part of the SW 1/4 NE 1/4, and a part of the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 and a part of Government Lot 1 of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the NE corner of said Government Lot 1 (Section corner common to sections 3, 4, 33 and 34), said corner monumented with a 3 inch diameter brass disk; Thence N. $9°18'37" W., a distance of 1319.23 feet along the northerly boundary of said Government Lot 1 to the NW corner of said Government Lot 1, said corner monumented with a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin; Thence S. 0°42'02" W., a distance of 1374.25 feet along the westerly boundary of said Government Lot 1 to the NE corner of said SW 1/4 NE 1/4, (NE 1/16 corner), said corner monumented with a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin; Thence N. 89°24'35" W., a distance of 758.06 feet along the northerly boundary of said SW 1/4 NE 1/4 to a 1/z inch diameter iron pin; Thence S. 0°12'36" W., a distance of 1324.11 feet to a point on the southerly b~nundary of said SW 1/4 NE 1/4, said point monumented with a 1/z inch diameter iron pin; Thence S. 89°21'39" E., a distance of 746.75 feet along the southerly boundary of said SW 1/4 NE 1/4 to the SW corner of said to SE 1/4 NE 1/4, said corner monumented with a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin; Thence S. 89°22'22" E. a distance of 1079.09 feet along the southerly boundary of said SE 1/4 NE 1/4 to a point; Thence N. 57°57'53" W., a distance of 506.10 feet to a point; DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 16 • • Thence S. 89°18'33" E., a distance of 675.00 feet parallel with the northerly boundary of said Government Lot 1 to a point on the easterly boundary of said SE 1/4 NE 1/4; Thence N. 0°38'21" E., a distance of 2124.52 feet along the easterly boundaries of said SE 1/4 NE 1/4 and Government Lot 1 to a point; Thence N. $9°17'59" W., a distance of 290.40 feet to a point; Thence N. 0°38'21" E., a distance of 150.00 feet parallel with the easterly boundary of said Government Lot 1 to a point; Thence S. 89°17'59" E., a distance of 290.40 feet to a point on the easterly boundary of said Government Lot 1; Thence N. 0°38'21" E., a distance of 160.00 feet along the easterly boundary of said Government Lot 1 to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 100.909 acres more or less. Also, this parcel is subject to all easements and rights-of-way of record or implied. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 17 • EXHIBIT B Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law/Conditions of A~Froval Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Autumn Faire Sub AZ and PPWevelopAgr DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ-00-009) - 18 • • BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL. Revised C/C 08-15-00 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC, THE APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 100.9 ACRES FOR AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLACK CAT AND USTICI~ ROADS, MERIDIAN, IDAHO Case No. AZ-00-009 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for public hearing on June 6, 2000, and continued until June 20, 2000, July 5, 2000, and tabled at the July 18, 2000 meeting and then re-noticed for public hearing on August 15, 2000, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., and at the June 6, 2000 meeting, Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and the partner of the owner, Gem Star Properties, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 1 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-009) • • behalf of the Applicant were: Scott Stanfield and Dave Mortenson, and appearing and testifying with comments/concerns or in opposition was: Linda Williams, and at the August 15, 2000 meeting, Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, and Tom Kuntz, Parks and Recreation Director, appeared and testified, and appearing on behalf of the Applicant were: Scott Stanfield of Earl SL Associates, and Susan Wildwood, and appearing and testifying with comments or concerns were: Linda Dettero, Monty Janicek, and Dean Langley, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter therefore makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT The notice of public hearing on the application for annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to said public hearing scheduled for June 6, 2000, and continued until June 20, 2000, July 5, 2000, and tabled at the July 18, 2000 meeting and then re-noticed for public hearing on August 15, 2000, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing; and that copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 2 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONINGBY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-009) • • television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the June 6, 2000, and continued until June 20, 2000, July 5, 2000, and tabled at the July 18, 2000 meeting and then re-noticed for public hearing on August 15, 2000, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-6511, and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 11-16-1. 3. The City Council takes judicial notice of its zoning, subdivision and development ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code, and all current zoning'maps thereof, and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance No. 629, January 4,1994, and maps and the ordinance establishing the Impact Area Boundary. 4. The property which is the subject to the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this reference is incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 5. The property is approximately 100.9 acres in size and is located at the southwest corner of Black Cat and Ustick Road. The property is designated as FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 3 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONINGBY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (A.Z-00-009) • Autumn Faire Subdivision. L.~ 6. The owner of record of the subject property is Langley Farms Limited Partnership, c/o Stella McNealy, Meridian, Idaho. 7. Applicant is Gem Star Properties, LLC., of Eagle, Idaho. 8. The property is presently zoned by Ada County as RT, and consists of agricultural property. 9. The Applicant requests the property be zoned as R-4 Low Density Residential. 10. The subject property is bordered to the east and south by Meridian city limits, and to the north and east by Ada County. 11. The property which is the subject of this application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 12. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 13. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: single family residential subdivision. 14. The Applicant requests zoning of the subject real property as R-4 which is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Single Family Residential. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 4 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-009) ~ • 15. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the consideration of this application. 16. Giving due consideration to the comment received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the following conditions of development are imposed: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 16.1 Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped shall be shown on the site plans. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 16.2 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for nondomestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 16.3 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance (Ord. 11-13). 16.4 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer shall be required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 16.5 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C. and 1 2-5-2.M. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 5 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONINGBY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-009) • • 16.6 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance (Ord. 11-14). No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs shall be permitted. 16.7 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance (Ord. 12-5-2.I~). 16.8 Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City as a condition of annexation. 16.9 Applicant shall be required to dedicate a site near the northeast corner of the development for a new City well. 16.10 Once the Black Cat Sanitary Sewer Trunk fee is established and approved by the Meridian City Council, such fees shall be applied to each building permit issued in this development. The current estimated fee is $1,500.00 per lot. 16.11 All lots within this development shall be subject to the applicable latecomers fees on the existing Ashford Greens sanitary sewer lift station and water main extension. 16.12 The well lot shall be designated access to the north parcel and access to the southeast quarter. The out parcels shall be annexed. 16.13 Applicant shall be required to develop a minimum 30 foot pathway along the south boundary of the proposed Phase 5 and that shall be required to be rough graded at the developer's expense. In order to accommodate the 30 foot pathway the affected lots shall be shortened in depth by 10 feet. 16.14 Construction materials and type of fencing along the pathway shall be subject to the Parks and Recreation Department and Planning and Zoning Department's approval. 16.15 Applicant shall provide a letter of credit, in the sum of the value of-the proposed park land based on the actual acreage and the applicant's purchase price. The surety shall be provided upon approval of the final plat for Phase 1 of Autumn Faire. It shall be exercisable by the City in FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 6 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-009) • ~ the event that three years elapse from the approval of the preliminary plat for Autumn Faire, and the park land or substitute property has not been transferred to the City. The applicant will post a letter of credit with the City in the amount of $204,000. This letter of credit will be in lieu of park impact fees for Phases One through Five of Autumn Faire. The proposed park land shall be transferred upon approval of the final plat for proposed Phase Five. The letter of credit will expire when the park land has been conveyed and accepted by the City. 16.16 The surety shall become void upon transfer of the proposed park land or substitute property in Phase 5 to the City of Meridian. 16.17 The City shall waive park fees associated with Autumn Faire because of the condition related to donation of park land or exercise of the letter of credit. 16.18 Applicant shall transfer the park land to the City upon approval of the final plat for Phase 5 of the project, and park land to be the site referred to at hearing as being in Autumn Faire No. 2 or an alternative site in Autumn Faire No. 1. 16.19 Applicant shall provide stubbed street, sewer and water to the proposed park as part of the construction of Phase 5 of the project. 16.20 If, at approval of the final plat of Phase Five, applicant does not deed the 6.8 acre park to the City, and if the applicant fails to provide 6.8 acres or more of park space in Phases Three, Four or Five of Autumn Faire, or if more than three years elapse after adoption of these Findings and the park site has not been donated, then, the letter of credit shall be exercisable in favor of the City. If the 6.8 acre park site is donated as represented by the applicant within three years of the date of adoption of these Findings, the letter of credit shall become void. 16.21 Applicant, at its expense, will provide stubbed street, sewer and water to ariy proposed park site during construction of Phase Five of Autumn Faire. 16.22 Applicant agrees, at City's option, to provide rough and fine grading of the park site. City shall reimburse applicant for the unit cost (but not FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 7 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-009) • • move in, move out, or mobilization costs) of the rough and fine grade work done on the park site. 17. It is found that if the developer pays for the requested improvements and complies with the conditions set forth in these Findings of Fact No. 16, and all sub-parts, the economic welfare of the City and its residents and tax and rate payers will be protected, which requirement shall be included in a development agreement, a condition of annexation and zoning designation. 18. It: is also found that the development considerations as referenced in Finding No. 16 are reasonable to require and must be taken into account, in order to assure the proposed development is designed, constructed, operated and maintained in a manner which is harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing, or intended character of the general vicinity, in order to assure that the proposed use will not change the essential character of the affected vicinity and will insure that the proposed uses will not be hazardous or disturbing to the existing, or future neighboring uses, particularly considering the impact of proposed development on potential to produce excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare and odors. 19. It is found that the zoning of the subject real property as Low Density Residential District (R-4) requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems and will be compatible with the Applicant's development intentions, and will assure that the zoning is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 8 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONINGBY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDMSION (AZ-00-009) • • Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Single Family Residential. 20. The subject annexation request and zoning designation and proposed development relates and is compatible to the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan of the City as follows: 20.1 The consideration of the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of the zoning ordinance assure that the processing of such application is the management of growth with the aim to achieve high- quality development. Enhancement of Meridian's quality of life for all residents is achieved by applying the criteria of the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance of the City to all applications such as the subject application. 20.2 This proposed new growth development will finance public service expansion by the requirement herein that the applicant comply with the requests submitted of the political subdivisions' responses within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area submitted in the record of this matter. 20.3 The application is consistent with Meridian's self-identity. 20.4 The preservation and improvement of the character and quality of Meridian's man-made environment while maintaining its identity as a self-sufficient community is achieved by applying the criteria of the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance of the City to the subject application. 20.5 Compliance with the requests of the political subdivisions providing services, assures that community services are being provided for existing and projected needs and that the land use patterns of the City are balanced to insure that revenues pay for services and that the Urban Service Planning Area is visually attractive, efficiently managed and clearly identifiable. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 9 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-009) • • 20.6 Compatible and efficient use of land through innovative and functional site design is achieved by applying the criteria of the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance of the City to the subject application. 21. The property can be physically serviced with City water and sewer, if applicant extends the lines. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The City of Meridian has authority to annex real property upon written request for annexation and the real property being contiguous or adjacent to city boundaries and that said property lies within the area of city impact as provided by Idaho Code Section 50-222. The Meridian City Code § 11-16 provides the City may annex real property that is within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Council may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 3. The City of Meridian has exercised its authority and responsibility as provided by "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975', codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code by.the adoption of `Comprehensive Plan City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ord. No. 629, January 4, 1994. 4. The following are found to be pertinent provisions of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan and are applicable to this Application: 4.A The Goals of the Comprehensive Plan are set forth at Page 5 and FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 10 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-009) • ~ include: 4.1 To preserve Meridian's environmental quality and to make provisions for and improve the total natural environment by adopting City-wide and Urban Service Planning Area policies, which deal with area-specific policies and programs. 4.2 To ensure that growth and development occur in an orderly fashion in accordance with adopted policies and procedures governing the use of land, residential development, the provision of services and the distribution of new housing units within the Urban Service Planning Area. 4.3 To encourage the kind of economic growth and development which supplies employment and economic self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces the present reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's ability to finance and implement public improvements, services and its open space character. 4.4 To provide housing opportunities for all economic groups within the community. 4.5 To preserve and improve the character and quality of Meridian's man-made environment while maintaining its identity as aself-sufficient community. 4.6 To encourage cultural, educational and recreational facilities which will fill the needs and preferences of the citizens of Meridian and to insure that these facilities are available to all residents of the City. 4.7 To provide community services to fit existing and projected needs. 4.8 To establish compatible and efficient use of land through the use of innovative and functional site design. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 11 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONINGBY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-009) • • 4.9 To encourage a balance of land use patterns to insure that revenues pay for services. 4.10 To create an Urban Service Planning Area which is visually attractive, efficiently managed and clearly identifiable. 4.B Comprehensive Plan Policies: The policies listed below most directly apply to the proposed project: Encourage new development which reinforces the City's present development pattern of higher-density development within the Old Town area and low- density development in outlying areas (Comp. Plan Policy 1.4U, pg. 23). Residential developments shall be phased in accordance with their connection to the municipal sewer system (Comp. Plan Policy 1.7, pg. 67). 5. The zoning of Low Density Residential District (R-4) is defined in the Zoning Ordinance at § 11-7-2 CH as follows: ~R-4) Low Density Residential District: Only single-family dwellings shall be permitted and no conditional uses shall be permitted except for planned residential development and public schools. The purpose of the R-4 District is to permit the establishment of low density single-family dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominantly residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible nonresidential uses. The R-4 District allows for a maximum of four (4) dwelling units per acre and requires connection to the municipal water and sewer systems of the City. 6. Since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land. See Burt vs. The City of Idaho Falls, 105 Idaho 65, 665 P2d 1075 (1983). 7. The development of the annexed land, if annexed, shall meet and comply FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 12 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDMSION (AZ-00-009) C • with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian including, but not limited to: Section 12- 2-4 which pertains to development time schedules and requirements; Section 12-4-13, which pertains to the piping of ditches; and Section 12-5-2 N, which pertains to pressurized irrigation systems. 8. The development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Zoning and Subdivision and Development Ordinance of the City of Meridian. 9. Section 11-16-4 A of the Zoning and Development Ordinance provides, in part, as follows: If property is annexed and zoned, the City may require or permit, as a condition of the zoning, that an owner or developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject property. If a commitment is required or permitted, it shall be recorded in the office of the Ada County Recorder and shall take effect upon the adoption of the ordinance annexing and zoning the property, or prior if agreed to by the owner of the parcel. Unless the commitment is modified or terminated by the City Council, the commitment shall be binding on the owner of the parcel, each subsequent owner, and each other person acquiring an interest in the property. A commitment is binding on the owner of the property even if it is unrecorded; however, an unrecorded commitment is binding on subsequent owners and each other person acquiring an interest in the property only if the subsequent owner and each other person acquiring an interest in the property has actual notice of the commitment. DECISION AND ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby Order and this does Order: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 13 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-009) • • 1. The applicant's request for annexation and zoning of approximately 100.9 acres to Low Density Residential District (R-4) is granted subject to the terms and conditions of this Order hereinafter stated. 2. The application is for annexation and zoning of 100.9 acres. The legal description shall be prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor, Licensed by the State of Idaho, and shall conform to all the provisions of the City of Meridian Resolution No. 158. The legal description for annexation must place this parcel contiguous to the Corporate City' Limits per Ordinance No. 686. 3. Developer enter into a Development Agreement that provides in the event the conditions therein are not met by the Developer that the property shall be subject to de-annexation, with the City of Meridian, which provides for the following conditions of development, to-wit: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 3.1 Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped shall be shown on the site plans. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation drainage district, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 3.2 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for nondomestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3.3 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 14 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-009) • • Zoning and Development Ordinance (Ord. 11-13) . 3.4 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer shall be required and shall be submitted to the.- City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 3.5 Outside lighting shall be designed and ,placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C. and 1 2-5-2.M. 3.6 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance (Ord. 11-14). No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs shall be permitted. 3.7 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance (Ord. 12-5-2.I~). 3.8 Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City as a condition of annexation. 3.9 Applicant shall be required to dedicate a site near the northeast corner of the development for a new City well. 3.10 Once the Black Cat Sanitary Sewer Trunk fee is established and approved by the Meridian City Council, such fees shall be applied to each building permit issued in this development. The current estimated fee is $1,500.00 per lot. 3.11 All lots within this development shall be subject to the applicable latecomers fees on the existing Ashford Greens sanitary sewer lift station and water main extension. 3.12 The well lot shall be designated access to the north parcel and access to the southeast quarter. The out parcels shall be annexed. 3.13 Applicant shall be required to develop a minimum 30 foot pathway along the south boundary of the proposed Phase 5 and that shall be required to be rough graded at the developer's expense. In order to FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 15 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONINGBY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-009) ~ • accommodate the 30 foot pathway the affected lots shall be shortened in depth by 10 feet. 3.14 Construction materials and type of fencing along the pathway shall be subject to the Parks and Recreation Department and Planning and Zoning Department's approval. 3.15 Applicant shall provide a letter of credit, in the sum of the value of the proposed park land based on the actual acreage and the applicant's purchase price. The surety shall be provided upon approval of the final plat for Phase 1 of Autumn Faire. It shall be exercisable by the City in the event that three years elapse from the approval of the preliminary plat for Autumn Faire, and the park land or substitute property has not been transferred to the City. The applicant will post a letter of credit with the City in the amount of $204,000. This letter of credit will be in lieu of park impact fees for Phases One through Five of Autumn Faire. The proposed park land shall be transferred upon approval of the final plat for proposed Phase Five.. The letter of credit will expire when the park land has been conveyed and accepted by the City. 3.16 The surety shall become void upon transfer of the proposed park land or substitute property in Phase 5 to the City of Meridian. 3.17 The City shall waive park fees associated with Autumn Faire because of the condition related to donation of park land or exercise of the letter of credit. 3.18 Applicant shall transfer the park land to the City upon approval of the final plat for Phase 5 of the project, and park land to be the site referred to at hearing as being in Autumn Faire No. 2 or an alternative site in Autumn Faire No. 1. 3.19 Applicant shall provide stubbed street, sewer and water to the proposed park as part of the construction of Phase 5 of the project. 3.20 If; at approval of the final plat of Phase Five, applicant does not deed the 6.8 acre park to the City, and if the applicant fails to provide 6.8 acres or more of park space in Phases Three, Four or Five of Autumn Faire, or if more than three years elapse after adoption of these Findings and the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 16 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONINGBY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-009) • • park site has not been donated, then, the letter of credit shall be exercisable in favor of the City. If the 6.8 acre park site is donated as represented by the applicant within three years of the date of adoption of these Findings, the letter of credit shall become void. 3.21 Applicant, at its expense, will provide stubbed street, sewer and water to any proposed park site during construction of Phase Five of Autumn Faire. 3.22 Applicant agrees, at City's option, to provide rough and fine grading of the park site. City shall reimburse applicant for the unit cost (but not move in, move out, or mobilization costs) of the rough and fine grade work done on the park site. 4. The City Attorney shall prepare for consideration by the City Council the appropriate ordinance for the annexation and zoning designation of the real property which is the subject of the application to (R-4) Low Density Residential District, and Meridian City Code § 11-7-2 C. 5. Subsequent to the passage of the Ordinance provided for in section 4 of this Order, the engineering staff of the Public Works Department shall prepare the appropriate mapping changes of the official boundaries and zoning maps as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-21-1 in accordance with the provisions of the annexation and zoning ordinance. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, an affected person is a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 17 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONINGBY GEM STAR PROPERTIES, LLC AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDIVISION (AZ-00-009) • • BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL C/C 01/16/01 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PRIMELAND DEVELOPMENT CO., LLP, FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR BRIDGETOWER SUBDMSION NO. 1, LOCATED NORTH OF USTICI~ ROAD AND EAST OF TEN MILE ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO CASE NO. FP-00-025 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to Meridian City Code § 12-3-7 on January 2, 2001, and tabled to January 16, 2001, and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete which has included certain comments and conditions as stated in a letter to the Mayor and Council from Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, listing 11 General Comments and 24 Site Specific Comments, which are herein found fair and reasonable, and at the January 16, 2001 meeting, Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, commented at the hearing, and Becky Bowcutt, Beclcy Bowcutt Planning Services, testified on behalf of the Applicant, and Frank Varrialle, appeared and testified, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR BRIDGETOWER SUBDIVISION NO. 1 (FP-00-025) - 1 • • IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The Plat of "BRIDGETOWER SUBDIVISION NO. 1" as evidenced in Plat bearing "PLAT OF BRIDGETOWER SUBDIVISION NO. 1, A PORTION OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 35, T. RN., R.1W., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2000, SHEET 1 OF 2, /0601 \0601-PLT.DWG BIB 11/O1/00, STAMPED NOV O1 2000, By: BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC., and PRIMELAND DEVELOPMENT CO., LLP, Developer", is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, dated December 28, 2.000, listing 11 General Comments and 24 Site Specific Comments, and Applicant's response letter by and through Becky Bowcutt Planning Services, dated December 29, 2000, true and correct copies of which are attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of eight pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, with the additional requirements that: 1.1 Additionally, at the City Council meeting on January 16, 2001, action taken by the Council consisted of the following pertaining to the tiling of the ditch: The City of Meridian will waive the requirement for tiling of the Creason Lateral Ditch for a portion of the property. The portion waived is on the North side of the applicant's parcel that is also contiguous to property owned by Leonard Huslcey. In lieu of tiling this section of ditch, the applicant will construct a six foot perimeter fence on that boundary. Additionally, the applicant will have to obtain the Nampa SL Meridian Irrigation District's approval for the fence. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR BRIDGETOWER SUBDIVISION NO. 1 (FP-00-025) - 2 ~ • On the western boundary, the applicant has to post a bond or a letter of credit for a three (3) year time period, and which may be renewed for additional three (3) year periods for an amount of estimated costs of construction or tiling of one-half (1/a) of the Creason Lateral along the western boundary of the property. 1.2 The Central District Health Department requires after written approval from the appropriate entities are submitted, they can approve this proposal for central sewage and central water; that plans must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality for central sewage and central water; that run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem; and it is suggested that stormwater be pretreated through a grassy Swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality; that engineers and architects should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals for guidance: 1.2.1 State of Idaho Catalog Of Stormwater Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities And Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division Of Environmental Quality, July 1997. 1.2.2 Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, January 1997. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: a. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and b. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR BRIDGETOWER SUBDIVISION NO. 1 (FP-00-025) - 3 • issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ~6~ day of ~~ ~ , 2001. By~ C'ify C'ok~c%? Prefi~f~~f 1~~~-h. /d°-ij~ Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department and the Public Works Department. ``~~~G,,t`~ O,tP01~'ugT~~~~'/fn By~ ated: ~~~~b ~ t ity Clerlc «.,~~~ ~~ ~ =' . ~, ~~ ~ msg/Z:\Work\M\MeridianVvleridian 15360M\BridgeTower AZ017 CUP043 PP017\FPOrder025 ~" f . ~1Z ~~~~• ..... .a11.1 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR BRIDGETOWER SUBDIVISION NO. 1 (FP-00-025) - 4 • BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL C/C 01/16/01 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TUMBLE CREED SUBDIVISION NO. S, LOCATED USTICK AND NORTH CINDER ROADS, MERIDIAN, IDAHO CASE NO. FP-00-029 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to Meridian City Code § 12-3-7 on January 16, 2001, and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete which has included certain comments and conditions as stated in a letter to the Mayor and Council from Bruce Frecldeton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, listing 10 General Comments and 15 Site Specific Comments, which are herein found fair and reasonable, and at the January 16, 2001 meeting, Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, commented at the hearing, and Clint Boyle of Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. testified on behalf of the Applicant, and no one appeared in opposition, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TUMBLE CREED SUBDIVISION NO. 5 (FP-00-029) - 1 • • IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The Plat of "TUMBLE CREED NO. 5 SUBDIVISION " as evidenced in Plat bearing the "PLAT SHOWING TUMBLE CREED NO. 5 SUBDIVISION, A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2000, File name: P:\A CIVIL\0006251\dwg\0OO6251_FP, Handwritten date of: 20 Nov 2000, Sheet 1 of 3, By: Pinnacle Engineers, Inc., and Stubblefield Construction Company, Developer", is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Bruce Freclcleton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, dated January 12, 2001, listing 10 General Comments and 15 Site Specific Comments, and a copy of a response letter from Pinnacle Engineers, Inc., dated January 15, 2001, of which true and correct copies are attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of five pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, with the additional requirements that: 1.1 Additionally, at the City Council meeting on January 16, 2001, action taken by the Council consisted of the following revisions to the Staff comments of January 12, 2001, as follows: That in Site Specific Comments, number 14, the additional changes are addressed within the Public Worlc Director, Gary Smith's memo to the Mayor and City Council, dated 01/15/01, and shall be incorporated herein as part of the conditions for the Final Plat, and such memo is attached hereto as Exhibit "B", and consists of two pages. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TUMBLE CREED SUBDIVISION NO. 5 (FP-00-029) - 2 f ~ Additionally, in Site Specific Comment number 11, the ACRD does not allow FEMA Flood Plains to be shown on the Plat, and therefore, the applicant must supply the City with a separate Plat map showing the FEMA Flood Plain for the City of Meridian's purposes. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: a. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and b. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ~~~~ day of G~i't~i~.. , 2001. E ~!1's/ ~k.h er C PI'QJiRr~h~ ,C~ef~, ,Bid-~/ Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department and the Public Works Department. `,.~~"`" ;`''ir3~a~ }~E~ , r,. B ~., ~ Dated: City Clerk ~-~6 ~ ~ msg/Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Tumble Creek Subdivision 5 FP029\FPOrderNo2 ~~, ~ ~~ ..~. fy,~ ~ ~ Q . ~. ~a~:.~..~.at %~~ • ~ ~~ h' ~ ~ %r, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TUMBLE CREED SUBDIVISION NO. 5 (FP-00-029) - 3 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR A Good Place to Live Robert D.Cortie CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anaetsan 33 EAST IDAHO Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888218 Cherie McCandless MEMORANDUM: To: Mayor & City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineerc~ Shari Stiles, Planning & Zoning Administrator LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 8845533 • FAX 888-6854 January 12, 2001 Re: Request for a Final Plat Approval of Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 5 - 48 Single- family Building Lots on 13.03 Acres in an R-4 Zone by Stubblefield Construction Company (File# FP-00-0261 We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: LOCATION The property is generally located on the south side of Ustick Road and west of Linder Road. It is designated as Single-family Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North -Phase 4 of Tumble Creek Subdivision. South -Future Phase 6 of Tumble Creek Subdivision. East - Phase 2 of Tumble Creek Subdivision. West - (Across Linder Road) Land Zoned RUT in Ada County, Idaho. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS 1. Applicant is to meet all terms of the approved preliminary plat. 2. Gross density and net density calculation on plat application is incorrect. Provide updated information for inclusion in file. 3. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized irrigation system approved and activated, fencing installed, and road base approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to applying for building permits. All development improvements shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. Tumble Credo No. S Subdivision Mayor and Council January 12, 2001 Page 2 4. Change the year of platting to 2001. 5. Revise the following note: 9. ...subject to the regulations of Chapter ~$ 11• Meridian Zoning Ordinance. The Planning and Zonins Department... 6. Water and sanitary sewer service to this site is proposed via extensions from adjacent developments. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes aze to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 7. Some lots appear to be less ,than the minimum required square footage of 8,000 square feet (e.g., Lots 10 and 11, Block 1). Provide lot closure information for all lots to verify minimum lot square footages of 8,000 square feet. 8. The developer, as a condition of the plat must construct a 20-foot wide minimum landscape buffer, beyond the required ACRD right-of--way along Ustick Road Fencing shall not encroach upon this buffer. 9. The landscaping and fencing plan submitted with the final plat application and dated 12/11/00 is approved, with the exception that the Indian Summer Crabs and Gallery Pears adjacent to Linder Road aze to be a minimum of 2" caliper. Fencing adjacent to Five Mile Creek must be permanent, non-sight-obscuring and located on the easement line. Fencing adjacent to the entry may not exceed a height of three feet within 20 feet of the right-of--way. A letter of credit or cash surety will be required for the landscaping and fencing improvements prior to City signature on the Final Plat. Fencing is to be constructed prior to applying for building permits. All landscaping is to be complete prior to obtaining Certificates of Occupancy. 10. Lot 16, Block 15, and Lot 11, Block 15, do not meet the minimum frontage requirement of 80 feet. Revise plat to conform 11. Indicate on the final plat map any FEMA Flood Plains affecting the azea being platted, and detail plans for reducing or eliminating the boundary. Any structures proposed within the 100- year floodplain will require approval through the conditional use permit process. 12. Place an arrow symbol on Lot 13, Block 3, towazd N. Blue Springs Avenue; and on Lots 13 and 14, Block 15, and Lot 27, Block 5, toward W. Tumble Creek Drive. These lots only meet frontage requirements with a specific orientation. Lot 27, Block 5, should be adjusted so it can meet the 80-foot frontage requirement on N. Blue Springs Avenue, as the median in the roadway will preclude any driveway access. 13. Execute the Certificate of Owners and accompanying Acknowledgement. FP-00-026 Tumble Creek No. 5 Subdivision ~~~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~~ Mayor and Council January 12, 2001 Page 3 14. Due to the absence of Bruce Freckleton, additional changes may be required once he has had an opportunity to review this final plat. 15. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved preliminary plat does not relieve Applicant of responsibility for compliance. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the azea being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Two-hundred-fifly- and 100-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All .streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations aze at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity aze determined after Idaho Power Company completes power designs. Street light contractor to obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 4. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all lots receiving engineered backfill. 5. Submit "Final" letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 6. Sewer and water mains shall be extended to and through the proposed development. 7. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that all street finish centerline elevations aze set a minimum of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. 8. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent. 9. Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. Sidewalks are to provide a clear five-foot-wide walkway pathway without encroachment of mailbox structures. 10. Submit three copies of the revised Final Plat Map to the Public Works Department for compliance review prior to development plan approvai. FP-00-026 Tumble Croek No. 5 Subdivision ~~'~,~~ ~ 1 N~ ~I Jan 16 0~ 09:36a i i snnaclo En~ineor:, Ina. 88 ~_ ~~~ Engtrieers, Inc. .Tanuary 15, 2001 (:ity of Meridian Planning Department At!~tt: Shari Stiles -Planning Director , Y ~ 331East Idsho St. `RE C E ~~E Meridian, ID 83642 ~~ ~~ ~ooi Re: >~l~r~l`~'I~~~or ~'t1~~reek:Stebdi~+isin~,lY~-: 5. ' Meridian Staff Memo datedJanusry 12, 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY rl FRK 01=FI~;E Dear Ms. Stiles: } l ah~ writing in response to the January 12, 2001 Memorandum (Memo) from yourself and Bruce k~r~ckleton (Assistant to City Engineer) related to the Final Plat for Tumble Creek Subdivision Nq. S. 1 have reviewed- the Memo and discussed the reyuirerne;tts and comments with the property owner. , Thic owner/developer will coittply with Memo -Site Specific Comments Items #1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13~ and 15. Several Memo items needed clarification or additional information including: 1. Memo Item #2 -Gross density: 3.68 dwelling units per acre. Net density: 3.55 dwelling units per acre. ' 2. Memo Item #7 -The lots in question' all meet the minimum required square foots a of 8, g 000 sq.tt. At the time of Final Plat review a lot clos~,re table with calculated areas will be submitted to Meridian City. ' 3. Memo Item #lU -The minimum frontage requirement of 80 feet will be met by making minor adjustments to lot lines. Lots 12, 13, 14, & 15, flock I S will have their north lot lines adjwted to the south (approx. 2 ft.). The minimum frontage requirements will still be met since Lots 1.3 8z ) 4 currently have anorth-south distance of 82.20 fl. After thc• adjustments these two lots will still have at least 80 ' ft, of frontage and the lots in question will. meet frontage nquiremen[s. '1'hie following•items are requested modifications to-the Memo: Memo Item # l 1 -Ada County doesn't allow the FIrMA l;lewcl Plains to be shown on the Plat.- We are requesting that this item be changed to read: "Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 5 will comply with FEMA and City ul' Meridian regulations." cW~~~~„'1~°~~JVE. SUITE B JAN 16 ~' 01 14:13 • BOISE. IDAHO 837]3 • (208) 887-7760 - ~Z~B) 8137-7781 ~~~h;bt-f '~ K ~ ~ - an 16 O} t t i 208 888 6854; 09;36a Pinnanle Engineers, Ync. Jan-16-01 1:59PM; ~e-987-7781 Page 4/4 p.4 2 Memo Item #I2 -Lots 13 and 14, Block 15, and meet frontage requirements on both sVeet frontages.~Thc o aer/deve operPr ~s to keep house frontages facing the side streets (Springtime Ave, p Springs Ave.) rather than oriented onto the entry drive (W. Tumble Creek Drue With housts oriented toward the side streets, the en ) Subdivision is enhanced, Additional) a byway corridor to the and the "greenbelt" alon W Y° sense of open space would be created g Tumble Creek Dr. would be promott:d (i.e.- less driveways would cross the "greenbelt"), 3. Memo Item # 14 - VVe are requesting that .this item be removed. We believe char this item allows for substantial changes to be• required beyond City Counci] approval. Further, Gary Smith provided a memo dated l/15/01 regarding Tumble Creek Subdivision No. 5, in which he provided comments for the Engineerin Departr<renl. I; We tlequest that the aforementioned modifications be incorporated into the Memo. any questions or need additional inf-ormation please contact me at 2U$_gg7_~~ If you have clintl~@p~acle-cngineers.com. b0 or via email at SincrrrelY, ~~ Clint $oyle Land l)se Planner cc: Jo~tr1 Stubblefield, Stubblefield Development File #CQU62~ l C004231 StaQMrmu COnnaents OI 1301.doa t t a i E'zl~~b%f "~~, Pape 2 ~~r 2 • Memo Ter Mayor & City Counal From: Ga D. Smith PE ~~~ rY , CC~ file, Shari Stiles, Pinnacle Engineers, John Stubblefield Dam 01/15/01 Re~ Final Plat Review -Tumble Creek No.5 Subdivision. Mayor ~ Council: In Bruce Fredcleton's absence I have conducted a review of this final plat submitted to you for your review and approval by Pinnacle Engineers for Stubblefield Development. In regards th that review, I have the following comments: Plat Sheet No. t: 1. The date of the plat needs to show 2001. 2. The street names Springtime Way and Linder Road need to be prefaced with North. 3. The plat tie distance shown from the northeast comer of Secction 2 to its north comer needs to be labeled as W. Ust/ck Road and the distance is slightly different than the distance of record shown on No.4 subdivision. 4. The distances shown along the northerly boundary of Lot 24, Block 5 need to be revised to equal the exterior boundary distance shown along this tot. 5. The distance along the west boundary of Lot 32, Block 3 and the diagonal distance across W. Whitestone Ct. is slightly different from the distance of record from Tumble Creek Subdivision. The record distances need to be shown. 6. Lots 11,16 -Block 15 and Lot 24 -Block 5 do not have ~~~~ 80 foot frontages. ~ v. such, rE Meridian City Fs+~nee< Meridian Public Worts Depattaiart 200 E Carita~St, Scribe 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642 2600 • Page 1 (206)887-2211 Fax (ZOB) 887-1297 ~x~a'b:f "~" • L` 7. The island in W. Tumble Creek Dr. needs to be labeled as Lot 1-Block 17. 8, The front of Lots 13, 14-Block 15 and Lot 27-Block 5 needs to be shown toward W. Tumble Creek Dr. The front of Lot 27-Block 5 as revised will be a problem because of the island. The garage entrance will need to face N. Blue Springs Ave. Plat Sheet No.2: 1. Owner needs to sign, with notary. 2. In the Certificate of Owners, the first call-out after reference to Tumble Creek No.1 Subdivision needs to be moved ahead of the reference to the reoorrled subdivision. The references to Tumble Creek No.1 need to be amended to remove the No.1 designation and to list as Tumble Creek Subdivision, as recorded. The iwo exterior boundary distances, previously discussed in Item No.5 above, need to be revised to record distances or the record distances need to be shown in parenthesis. Regards, Gary • Page 2 ~~~~ ~~ ~ WHITE PETERSON WHITE, PETERSON, MORROW. rT'' ROSSMAN, NYE & ROSSMAN, P.A. T L.AW ]ULIE KLEIN FISCHER CHRISTOPHER S. NYE NUE, SUITE 31 NAMPA OFFICE WM. E GloawY, III BRENT JOHNSON PHILIP A. PETERSON ERIC $. ROSSMAN ~ ~ ~~ ~- '{ 1150 13680-1150 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH POST OFFICE BOX 247 0247 IDAHO 83653 P D. SAMUEL JOHNSON TODD A. ROSSMAN ~ 99 - NAM A, LARRY D. MOORS DAVID M. SWARTLEY j ~ ~ 11 TEL (108) 466.9272 66 4405 X 208 WILLIAM A. MORROW TERRENCE R. WHITE*'~ ~ . ( ) 4 FA WILLIAM F. NICHOLS~' ~ JJJYYYiii •ALSO ADMITTED IN OR " PLEASE REPLY TO ••ALSO ADMITTED IN WA , , - _-~ MERIDIAN OFFICE ~~aiy 23, 2001 RE~EIVE~ William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk JAN 2 3 2001 33 East Idaho Street CIZ*y pF MERIDIAN Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., /TUMBLE CREED SUBDIVISION NO. 5 FINAL PLAT (FP-00-029) Dear Will: Regarding the above referenced matter, please find enclosed the original of the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT for approval and signature by the Mayor and yourself. Please serve a copy of the ORDER upon the Applicant, with a Certificate of Service in the file and a copy to Planning and Zoning and Public Works, and the attorney's office. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Very truly you Wm. F. Nichols msgfZ:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Tumble Creek Subdivision 5 FP029\Clerk012301FP.Ltr • • BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL C/C 01/02/01 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ROBERT GLENN, FOR A VARIANCE REQUESTING TO USE MERIDIAN CITY WATER FOR IRRIGATION IN THE WANDA' S MEADOW SUBDIVISION, LOCATED NORTH OF E. USTICI~ ROAD AND EST OF N. LOCUST GROVE ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO VAR-00-023 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE The above entitled matter coming on regularly for public hearing before the City Council on January 2, 2001, and Bruce Freclcleton, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant was Pat Tealey, and no one appeared in opposition, and the City Council having received the transmittal to agencies and having received the variance application, having heard the testimony presented, being fully advised in the premises does hereby make the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order of Decision, as follows to-wit: FINDINGS OF FACT FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page 1 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM / BY: ROBERT R. GLENN / VAR-00-023 • • 1. T'he City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and Development Ordinances codified at Title 11 Municipal Code of the City of Meridian and all current zoning maps thereof and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993 Ordinance #629 -January 4, 1994 and Maps. 2. The requirements of Idaho Code §§ 67-6509, 6516 and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 12-11-3 as evidenced in the record of this matter. 3. The Applicant is Robert R. Glenn, whose address is 2604 North Cole Road, Boise, Idaho 83704. 4. The owner of the property is Robert R. Glenn, whose address is 2604 North Cole Road, Boise, Idaho 83704. 5. The location of the subject property is presently located in a Low Density Residential District (R-4) zone, and which subject property is located on the north side of Usticlc Road approximately 1/4 mile west of Locust Grove Road, Meridian, Idaho. 6. The legal description of the property appertains to the real property that is included within the Vicinity Map as appears in the record of proceeds of this matter, which is on file in the City Clerk's Office. 7. The present land use of the subject property is presently zoned as Low Density Residential District (R-4), and which subject property is presently a large single-family lot. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page 2 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM / BY: ROBERT R. GLENN / VAR-00-023 • • 8. The proposed land use of the subject property is to develop the subject property in the~following manner: Asingle-family subdivision. 9. That a vicinity map, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", consisting of one page, of the proposed scale approved by the City Council showing property lines, existing streets, proposed district and such other items as required have been furnished. 10. The Applicant seeks a variance of the following provision of the Meridian City Code, § 9-1-28, PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM, and in the R-4 zone, provides as follows: 9-1-28 PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM: A. System Required; Waiver: 1. In addition to the requirements of this Chapter pertaining to the domestic water system and its use, every residentially zoned lot, parcel or piece of land upon which a residential unit is, or will be, constructed, after the effective date hereof, shall construct, install, or connect to a pressurized irrigation system. In the case of residential subdivision developments, a pressurized irrigation system shall be constructed and installed at the same time as the domestic water lines, but not necessarily in the same trenches. There shall be no cross-connections between the domestic water lines and the irrigation water lines that do not comply with Chapter 3 of this Title. 2. Provided, however, the requirements of this Section may be waived upon proof that any particular lot, parcel or piece of land does not have water rights in an existing irrigation district. B. Standards: The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to establish standards for pressurized irrigation systems and all pressurized irrigation systems shall comply with those standards. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page 3 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM / BY: ROBERT R. GLENN / VAR-00-023 • • C. Joint-Use Connection Of Irrigation And City Standards: No subdivision, or building, lot, or parcel of land located within that subdivision, which subdivision, building, lot, or parcel of land, has a common landscape sprinkler irrigation system being supplied landscape irrigation water from a source other than the City's domestic water system, shall be allowed to also connect its landscape sprinkler irrigation system to the City's domestic water system. Provided, however, all buildings, lots, or parcels of land, within the subdivision connected to the common landscape sprinkler irrigation system may be allowed one joint-use point of connection to the City's domestic water system which connection shall have an approved baclcflow prevention device. This joint-use connection shall only be to provide irrigation water during the time when the common landscape irrigation system has no supply of water. The off-on control value of this joint use connection shall be under the control of the City Waterworks Superintendent. 11. All property owners within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries have been notified by mail, and their mailing addresses may be obtained from the list on=file with the City Clerk. 12. The minimum requirements of the ordinance that need to be reduced to permit the proposed use would be the elimination of the requirement that subdivisions must have a pressurized irrigation system. 13. The difficulty or hardship which would result if the requirements of the ordinance were applied to the subject property is that the subject property has gravity irrigation water provided by Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District and receives water on a 10-day rotation schedule. The amount of water needed for the 26-lot subdivision cannot be obtained with this type of delivery schedule. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page 4 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM / BY: ROBERT R. GLENN / VAR-00-023 • • 14. The unusual or peculiar circumstances which indicate that regulations of the ordinance should not be strictly complied with, and the special conditions and circumstances that exist, are the same as number 13 above. 15. A literal interpretation of the provisions of the ordinance would deprive the Applicant rights because the applicant would not be able to provide an adequate irrigation system by a pressurized irrigation system. 16. The existence of special circumstances or conditions affecting the property is that the current irrigation delivery system provided to the property has been in place for some time. The developer has had no say in the design of the system and the delivery schedule to the site. Each lot would use the City's domestic water off individual services, and the developer would be assessed a well development free in lieu of providing a pressurized irrigation system and no dry lines shall be installed. 17. Granting the variance would maintain rights which would be afforded to others in the same situation. 18. The Water Department notes that the Applicant should look for other irrigation sources, possibly a ground water well. 19. The purpose of the R-4 Low Density Residential District is to permit the establishment of low density single-family dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominantly residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page 5 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM / BY: ROBERT R. GLENN / VAR-00-023 • • Comprehensive Plan of the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the ;intrusion of incompatible nonresidential uses. The R-4 District allows for a maximum of four (4) dwelling units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal water and sewer systems of the City. 20. The granting of the requested variance will not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area of the proposed plat. 22. The granting of this variance will not have an effect of altering the interest and purpose of the Subdivision or Development Ordinance and/or the City's Comprehensive- Plan for the reasons stated above. 23. The applicant paid the fee established by the City Council for application variance. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The City of Meridian has authority pursuant to the enactment of the Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975 codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, and in particular, by the provisions of Idaho Code § 67-6516 to provide as part of its zoning ordinance for .the process of applications for variance permits. 2. The City of Meridian has exercised its authority of Idaho Code § 67-6516 by the enactment as a part of its Zoning and Development Ordinance variances, as set forth in Meridian City Code § 11-18. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page 6 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM / BY: ROBERT R. GLENN / VAR-00-023 • • 3. That the requirements for the processing of a variance request are set forth in Idaho Code §§ 67-6509, 6516 and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 11-17-5. 4. Application and standards for variances are set forth in Meridian City Code § 11-18-2, and the findings which are required are set forth in Meridian City Code § 11- 18-3, include required findings that there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that strict application of the provisions of Zoning and Development Ordinance would clearly be impracticable and unreasonable, and a finding that strict compliance with the requirements of the Zoning and Development Ordinance would result in extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because unusual topography, the nature or condition of adjacent development, or other physical conditions or other conditions that make strict compliance with the ordinance unreasonable under the circumstances, or that the conditions and requirements of said ordinance will result in inhibiting the achievements or the objectives of the ordinance, and that the granting of a specified variance will not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated, and that such variance will not have the effect of altering the interest and purposes of the Zoning and Development Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 5. Meridian City Code, § 9-1-28, PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM, and in the R-4 zone provides as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page 7 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM / BY: ROBERT R. GLENN / VAR-00-023 • • 9-1-28 PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM: A. System Required; Waiver: 1. In addition to the requirements of this Chapter pertaining to the domestic water system and its use, every residentially zoned lot, parcel or piece of land upon which a residential unit is, or will be, constructed, after the effective date hereof, shall construct, install, or connect to a pressurized irrigation system. In the case of residential subdivision developments, a pressurized irrigation system shall be constructed and installed at the same time as the domestic water lines, but not necessarily in the same trenches. There shall be no cross-connections between the domestic water lines and the irrigation water lines that do not comply with Chapter 3 of this Title. 2. Provided, however, the requirements of this Section may be waived upon proof that any particular lot, parcel or piece of land does not have water rights in an existing irrigation district. B. Standards: The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to establish standards for pressurized irrigation systems and all pressurized irrigation systems shall comply with those standards. C. Joint-Use Connection Of Irrigation And City Standards: No subdivision, or building, lot, or parcel of land located within that subdivision, which subdivision, building, lot, or parcel of land, has a common landscape sprinkler irrigation system being supplied landscape irrigation water from a source other than the City's domestic water system, shall be allowed to also connect its landscape sprinkler irrigation system to the City's domestic water system. Provided, however, all buildings, lots, or parcels of land, within the subdivision connected to the common landscape sprinkler irrigation system may be allowed one joint-use point of connection to the City's domestic water system which connection shall have an approved baclcflow prevention device. This joint-use connection shall only be to provide irrigation water during the time when the common landscape irrigation system has no supply of water. The off-on control value of this joint use connection shall be under the control of the City Waterworks Superintendent. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page 8 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM / BY: ROBERT R. GLENN / VAR-00-023 • • DECISION AND ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby Order and this does Order: 1. That the Applicant is hereby granted a variance from the pressurized irrigation system and shall be allowed to have each lot use the City's domestic water of individual services. The Applicant shall be assessed a well development fee in lieu of providing a pressurized irrigation system and shall not install dry lines for this R-4 zone on the north side of Usticlc Road approximately 1/4 mile west of Locust Grove Road, Meridian, Idaho. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of a variance authorizing a variance of the PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM Requirements in the R-4 Zone as provided in the Section 9-1-28 and may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the l~'~'day of ~G~~'~- , 2001. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page 9 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM / BY: ROBERT R. GLENN / VAR-00-023 • • ROLL CALL: COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON VOTED `J COUNCILMAN KEITH BIRD VOTED COUNCILPERSON TAMMY deWEERD VOTED__~ COUNCILPERSON CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED -~%'L MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DATED: l l ~ -O~ MOTION: APPROVED:~~~~J DISAPPROVED: ~ _~ ~ `~~ Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Worlcs Department, grid the City Attorney office. c~,q~~s~t'itt~rrr,,r B ~ ~:.- 1 Dated City Clerk ~~~~ ~© msg/Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Wanda's Meadow FP023\Ff~lsGrantVariance FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- ~ ~. ~l~A;~~~ ~ A S/7.~~~1 ~ ~ :." ~ ~~ ~: X'. ~ ~a ~• ,~ f'~~s, ~~~'~`~` wry y ,~ ~ `Y Page 10 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM / BY: ROBERT R. GLENN / VAR-00-023 • VICINITY MAP 0~ WANDA'S b1EADO5ti SUBDIVISION SITUATED IN THE SE 1 /4, SECTION 31, T.4N., R.1 E., B.M. MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2000 ' N. 0 300 150 0 300 600 900 SCALE IN FEET I" = 300' TEALEY'S LAND SURVEYING 2501 BOGUS BASIN RD. ~- BOISE, IDAHO 83702 208-385-0636 Project No. 2151 Sheet 1 of 1 E.hr6A :9" • • BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PACI~ARD ESTATES DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR PACI~ARD ACRES SUBDIVISION NO. 2, LOCATED SOUTH OF USTICI~ ROAD BETWEEN LOCUST GROVE ROAD MERIDIAN, IDAHO CASE NO. FP-00-018 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to Meridian City Code § 12-3-7 on October 17, 2000, and continued until November 8, 2000, and continued from January 2, 2001, and tabled until January 16, 2001, and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete which has included certain comments and conditions as stated in a letter to the Mayor and Council from Bruce Freclcleton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, listing 7 General Comments and 25 Site Specific Comments, which are herein found fair and reasonable, and at the January 16, 2001 meeting, Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, commented at the hearing, and Pat Tealey testified on behalf of the Applicant, and Wanda Sharp, Dale Sharp and Craig Groves appeared and testified, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR PACI<ARD SUBDIVISION NO. 2 (FP-00-018) - 1 • • IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Plat of "PACI<ARD ACRES SUBDIVISION NO. 2" as evidenced in Plat bearing the Project No. 1408, Sheet 1 of 2, By: Tealey's Land Surveying, and Packard Estates Development, LLC, Developer, is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, dated September 28, 2000, listing 7 General Comments and 25 Site Specific Comments, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and a copy of a Statement received by the North Wingate Lane Residents, and consisting of eight pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, with the additional requirements that: 1.1 Additionally, at the City Council meeting on January 16, 2001, action taken by the Council consisted of the following revisions to the Staff comments of September 28, 2000, as follows: Under Site Specific Comment number 9, it shall read as follows: 9. Show Wingate Lane on the final plat map as a 15-foot wide easement, and reference the existing 15-foot wide recorded private lane easement. Under Site Specific Comment number 13, it shall read as follows: 13. Provide aten-foot-wide easement for public utilities, drainage, and irrigation along the southern boundary of Lot 20, Block 2, and ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR PACI~ARD SUBDIVISION NO. 2 (FP-00-018) - 2 r • west of 15-foot-wide easement for Wingate Lane along Lots 17-22, Block 2, and Lot 10, Bloclc 5. Under Site Specific Comment number 15, it shall read as follows: 15. Provide detailed fencing and gate plans that also show the proposed location of irrigation clean out structures for approval prior to signature on the final plat. Irrigation plans must be approved by downstream water users. Perimeter fencing shall be installed prior to applying for building permits. The applicant needs to provide revised detailed fencing and gate plans. Under Site Specific Comment number 19, it shall read as follows: 19. Wingate Lane borders the eastern boundary of this subdivision. The easement for this private roadway needs to be shown along the backs of Lots 17-22, Bloclc 2, and Lot 10, Block 5. All headgate and cleanout structures are to be located outside of the 15-foot-wide easement and be accessible to water users without requiring entrance onto individual building lots or climbing over fences. Under Site Specific Comment number 20, it shall read as follows: 20. The City requires that there be a gate across E. Challis Street on the east boundary of Wingate Lane, and one on the west boundary of Wingate Lane. This shall allow pedestrian traffic, as well as bicycles. Under Site Specific Comment number 23, it shall read as follows: 23. Staff foresees a problem with buyers of Lots 17-22, Bloclc 2, trying to access Wingate Lane if the easement is part of the platted lots. The developer shall have their attorney draw up a release of dominant parcel interest in the private lane easement and record it prior to signature on the final plat. Also provide a recorded copy of deed restriction to prohibit access to Wingate Lane and forbid gates or removal of permanent fencing on these lots prior to applying for building permits. Fencing shall be set at the western boundary of the 15-foot easement for Wingate Lane. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR PACI~ARD SUBDIVISION NO. 2 (FP-00-018) - 3 • • 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: a. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and b. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. /6 ~~ By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of ~ , 2001. By: Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department and the Public Works Department. B ~ i Dated: City Clerk /~ /~ ~~ msg/Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\BridgeTower AZ017 CUP043 PP017\FPOrder025 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR PACI<ARD SUBDIVISION NO. 2 (FP-00-018) *`\\,~~s~~r it i~ l ur'ri., ~sr ~ o ~"L - .~~ ~~~ fo' , -4 +v ' To: Mayor and City Council Cit of Meridian V1 ~ y ,0 33 East Idaho ,`~ Meridian, Idaho 83642 \~ ' ^ ~ . ~,p N ` From: North Wingate Lane Residern ~'~" 2445 North Wingate Lane Meridian, Idaho 83642 • October 16, 2000 ~~~ ~~ Jv,~ ~ r~~~.~~n ~;~ty o l~'ii l~f~i~° city ~, _z Re: Statement of expectations for developers of Packard Estates Development, LLC. The residents of North Wingate Lane feel it is necessary to restate their position concerning use, access, or development of Wingate Lane by anyone not directly now living in a residence on the lane. We are supported by previous documents and proceedings that specifically prohibit any kind of access to North Wingate by others not presently living on the lane. We are very weary of having to keep such a vigilant watch on the proceedings for development of the lands that abut North Wingate Lane. We have made it clear in the past that all traffic of any kind, including pedestrian and bike traffic, will be prohibited now and in the future from traveling on or across North Wingate Lane. We expect the compliance of Packard Estates Development, LLC. to the city council for the construction of permanent gates (for the use of emergency vehicles only) and fences to assure this. The property owners on the lane established this lane as a private lane, July 25, 1913. Ada County has already ruled that no more houses may be built along North Wingate Lane that would require entrance and exit directly from the lane. The residents of the lane pool money to maintain the lane. In the past, great damage has occurred because of use by construction vehicles that have illegally used the lane to access the developing areas of Packard Estates Development, LLC. Enforcing compliance has been difficult. The council has stated that permanent, not wire, fences and gates were to be constructed along North Wingate Lane before development began. The wire fences have been lowered whenever someone wanted to use the lane to access or crossover to the east or west development. Only emergency county access is allowed. All other accesses, including utility, ACRD, or irrigation, must be done on the development property and not involve the lane in any way, or at any time. No gates will be installed to allow the passage of pedestrians and bicycles across North Wingate Lane. This allowance would only invite problems. Sometimes this area is referred to as the unconstructed portion of E. Challis. It is not. It is part of our established, permanent private lane. We greatly appreciate the efforts of Mr. Bruce Freckleton, and Ms. Shari Stiles. They have been very helpful to explain and interpret the somewhat confusing documents concerning these proceedings. We also appreciate any other entity that is working to assure that legal concerns are correctly dealt with on this matter. Please help us put to rest any furtlier worries concerning our proper right to keep our private lane as such. Sincerely, '/ „U ~~ ~~~~, C ~ r~~-- North Wingate Lane Residents a ~ ~ ~~~ -~-~~~ Attachment Enclosed: ~~ ~~ IIC'13 E)FTRG~S'L"XE (:~LLE3' • ~t:»'oR q Good Place to Li~~e RobcYt D. Come CITY OF MERIDIAN CTCY COL.~NCIL CIE\iBERS Ron :~ndv~on 33 EAST IDAHO l;eith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Tanunv de\L'cxrd (20R) 88R~433 • F.a.\ (208) 887-1813 City Clerk Otfiee Fax (208) 8881218 ChcSi~ h[cCandless MEMORANDUM: To: Mayor & City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engine~~~ Shari Stiles, Planning & Zoning Administrator LEG.4I, DEP:~RT\~`T (208) 28R-2499. • Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORDS BUILDING DEPART~tE~1T (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLA:~tiT:VG :\ND ZONING DEPARTtitENT (208) 8845533 • FrLl' 888854 September 28, 2000 Re: Request for a Final Plat Approval of Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2 - 60 Single- family Building Lots on 23.02 Acres in an R-4 Zone by Packard Estates Development, LLC (File# FP-00-018) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: LOCATION & SURROUNDING USES The subject property is located west of Wingate Lane, south of Ustick Road, and east of Locust Grove Road. The parcel(s) is currently zoned R-4. The South Slough borders the property on the north, along with property owned by Vern Alleman on the north and northwest boundaries. The southwest portion of the property borders Chamberlain Estates Subdivision. Chateau Meadows East No. 8 Subdivision is south of the property, along with two five-acre parcels in Ada County. The northeast portion of the property borders other acreages with single-family homes in Ada County. The property is located in an area designated as single-family residential in the Comprehensive Plan. SITE SPECIFIC CONIl~IIIV1'S 1. Applicant is to meet all terms of the approved preliminary plat and development agreement. 2. Applicant has indicated previously that the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be connected to the existing system within Packard Subdivision. The common areas within the development will be a subject to City of Meridian water assessments for the domestic backup. Payment of water assessment fees is required prior to city signatures on the final plat map. 3. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all lots impacted by filling. 4. The design of drainage areas shall ensure that water is retained only during major storm events for a maximum 24hour period. FP-oo-o 1 s Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2 Mayor and Council • • September 28, 2000 Page 2 Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized irrigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constructed, fencing and gates installed, and road base approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to applying for building permits. Landscaping shall be installed prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, pathways, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 6. Applicant shall be responsible to construct asix-foot-high, permanent perimeter fence along property boundary (and westerly easement line of Wingate Lane), except where the City has expressly agreed, in writing, that such fencing is not necessary. Fencing is to be in place prior to applying for building permits. 7. Revise the following notes: (5.) u adjacent to the exterior subdivision boundary lines. (~ u Lot 10, Block 5, Lot 1, Block 8, and Lots 32 and 33, Block 2 u (8) u LI2) Access to Wingate Lane is specifically prohibited. (13) This subdivision is subiect to the terms of a develovment agreement recorded as Instrument No. ,records of Ada County, Idaho. (14) (Provide a blanket easement to the City of Meridian over Lot 33, Block 2 for the operation and maintenance of the sanitary sewer intercepter.) (IS) Lots 1, 23, 24-26, and 29, Block 9 shall be subject to the terms of the existing temporary sanitary sewer easements along their western boundary. No permanent structures, fences, trees, or brush shall be placed within said easements. Remove 20-foot-wide sanitary sewer easement south of E. Chemise Drive, and reference the existing easement instrument number north of E. Chemise Drive. 9. Show Wingate Lane on the final plat map as a 20-foot wide easement, and reference the existing 1 S-foot wide recorded private lane easement. The extra 5-foot width is required by the City of Meridian as the minimum width for an emergency access. 10. Widen Lot 33, Block 2, by ten feet to accommodate the South Slough sewer interceptor main. Provide a blanket easement to the City of Meridian for the extension of the South Slough Sewer Interceptor (see plat note #14 above). This portion of the sewer trunk line shall be constructed at the time this subdivision is developed. 11. Revise the reference to the sewer easement along the western side of the subdivision to read: 20 foot-wide temporary sanitary sewer easement, Instruments Nos. ,and (Make sure you reference both easements, Cassell, and PNE/Edmonds) 12. Add an arrow symbol to the plat legend that depicts front of house orientation. Place symbol on Lot 27, Block 2, towazd N. Devlin Way. An arrow is required because less than minimum FP-0o-0is Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2 Mayor and Council September 28, 2000 Page 3 street frontage is shown on the other lot side. 13. Provide aten-foot-wide easement for public utilities, drainage, and irrigation along the southern boundary of Lot 2, Block 2, and west of 20-foot-wide easement for Wingate Lane along Lots 17-22, Block 2, and Lot 10, Block 5. 14. Detailed landscaping plans for all common areas, including species, size, quantities, and locations, and pathway details must be submitted for approval to the Planning & Zoning Department prior to City Engineer signing Final Plat. 15. Provide detailed fencing and gate plans that also show the proposed location of irrigation cleanout structures for approval prior to signature on the final plat. Irrigation plans must be approved by downstream water users. Perimeter fencing shall be installed prior to applying for building permits. 16. Sanitary sewer and water service to this site will be via extensions of the existing mains installed in adjacerrt developments. Applicant will be responsible to construct lateral sewer and water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. 17. Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. 18. Sidewalks are to provide a clear five-foot-wide walkway pathway without encroachment of mailbox structures. 19. Wingate Lane borders the eastern boundary of this subdivision. The easement for this private roadway needs to be shown along the backs of Lots 17-22, Block 2, and Lot 10, Block 5. The easement width needs to be increased to 20 feet wide to .meet Meridian Fire Department requirements. All headgate/cleanout structures are to located outside of the 20-foot-wide easement and be accessible to water users without requiring entrance onto individual building lots or climbing over fences. 20. One of the City's requirements in the development agreement conflicts with Ada County Highway District's requirements. The applicant is not to construct the 20-foot-wide portion of E. Challis Street at the east boundary, and is to deposit money to complete construction of E. Challis Street and remove the gates when (and i fl the two five-acre parcels to the south are developed (when Wingate Lane can be vacated). The City put a condition that a 20-foot-wide gate be constructed at the easement line of Wingate Lane that allows emergency fire department access only (with appropriate signage). ACHD's condition of approval is to install gates and allow the passage of pedestrians and bicycles across the unconstructed portion of E. Challis Street. The homeowners along Wingate Lane have requested that all access to Wingate Lane be prohibited. Staff requests the City Council to specifically address this issue and instruct staffof preferred direction. Fr-0o-0is Packard Acxes Subdivision No. 2 Mayor and Council September 28, 2000 Page 4 21. Another requirement of the development agreement is provide a pathway along the South Slough, as it is designated as a pathway in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. However, Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District will not allow a license agreement for a pathway along live irrigation ditches. Perhaps, instead of designating a pathway, the applicant could pave over the sewer easement along the slough as a "sewer access road" to satisfy the pathway requirement and avoid problems with Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District. 22. All damages to Wingate Lane caused by the developer or contractors are to be repaired immediately. Homeowners along Wingate Lane have reported that damage to the lane presently exists from construction equipment and work on the irrigation system No building permits will be accepted until the repair work is complete. The developers have agreed that no construction traffic will be allowed to access Wingate Lane. 23. Staff foresees a problem with buyers of Lots 17-22, Block 2, trying to access Wingate Lane if the easement is part of the platted lots. The developer shall have their attorney draw up a release of dominant pazcel interest in the private lane easement and record it prior to signature on the final plat. Also provide a recorded copy of deed restriction to prohibit access to Wingate Lane and forbid gates or removal of permanent fencing on these lots prior to applying for building permits. Fencing shall be set at the western boundary of the 20-foot easement for Wingate Lane. 24. Submit copies of proposed restrictive covenants and deed restrictions for review. This information was required at the preliminary plat stage; application indicates covenants have not been submitted. 25. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved preliminary plat does not relieve Applicant of responsibility for compliance. o ~ i"` °~~~ GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, in rsecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. One-hundred-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department.. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. FP-00-018 Packard Aces Subdivision No. 2 Mayor and Council • September 28, 2000 Page 5 4. Submit oFinalp letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 5. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent. 6. Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. 7. If possible, respond in writing to this memorandum by noon on October 3, 2000. Submit three copies of the revised Final Plat Map to the Public Works Department for compliance review prior to development plan approval. i:P-0o-0is Packard Aces Subdivision No. 2 • pix~~ /Z~d~..-J / ~ L' ~ ` ~ ! I ' ~ ~ ~ ~1 1 ~ n2 ~ ~\ ••ti L 1~ 1 • E r-) .y ~ . ~, ~ ~ P~T,,.s ,r ~ ~` c .S ~ ~ . rt J 1 J' L ~ ~ l o 1 6' ~ I ~ r ^ -~- A P III ~. ~'~ ,'' I v, ~ `L I a ~ C ~° iT 4 ~ J i . e /r C 4J .r /~' ` Orn ~ ~ ~ ~c ~ ul ~ t ~~ ~, ~ ~ ., •, • L~~n CLit J7 1- C ' {~e 7 - e ~ ~ f r~ 'J ~y ~ .' _ - - / '. t c 5 ~ J 7 ~ ~~ ~ i ~' / r ~ ^ . J i O ~J ~ ~ (1 n ~ ~ c f G T r~t~. V \' ~; ' ;7~ ~ 6 i V i.y a „ a/a v G r ~ u r / ' ' ® ~ / y 5 . ~.. i j .a /~ C- ~- aNyCo ~ G'nJr) 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i-- e y J . r / r { ~ ~ o ~4... s• , ~ ia~ ~ ~T~ y `~ C lrnTcs~ ~ ~P,.,~ i ~f 4 ' (,! / C Y V C ~ r L Low ' _ -. ~, / j , . Z i.r.C. L../ C J - .f /~ c v '~ U~ !~,.+ y M T rv L ~ ..! ~ („J r ~ L p J' .. F~ / C I c .. T L~ L c ..• .1 T r 4 C ~ a ..~ ~ ~ /'~ it a t. L .a...~.. - ~. NALL jl.e h/ z,~ /-OVT / O tG.y e<e_ /-/^'...2 ~ ~ ~~ a r~'Z"`~ 'O ~ . ~ L~ /7 L C d J S ~- v v,.t / J~ ~ c ~'i~ ..mac ~- C :., a ..; t c/ r ~ / .J . ~ .. ~ f a ... c :. ~ ~-,, v .._-.r / A ~-c T 4 . ~ ~ c c - ~. w a ..~~~ ~, z -..~ < . ~ `~-~ L. ~ r ~T 7 A ,y„L E i~ ~ ~ ~ /! ~ r c L.~j H-•,f i/ E c ..C . {' / ~J ~/ /a s~ ^ g e p -7` C L .1 ~., c C' .n 4 Jo ..C 6 7 ~ ~ v t ~~' a •- 1 tilr LL r % hc~ wi..fsn~ c1 Oa /7!X 1 t ~~ ~ ~, ~ "' ~, T / / c T ~- II ~ T~H C ~~~ ' / ~~' ~` A Ctca O w C o ... t.~ L„ ,. ~. ~~ o ~ j lu f lcc7/c-r% • o ~ L -~ ..r._ N ar c •ff T r ~ s .` .. e ..t~ /~ r^ ~- T co. 'Ta ~, ., ~-. •-, s ... c e ..l .~ o'~u.. ~ O - .re ~ '~~ s., V s ..... O~ H (, w T i r..( // r '~ C4 t J.J ~ ~ i e i ~ • January 11, 2001 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 1 b, 2001 APPLICANT Treasurer's Department ITEM NO. 4-A-1 REQUEST 1999 / 2000 FY Audit Report AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR ~~"' ~1 CITY ATTORNEY ~ : , ~ y CITY POLICE DEPT: ~ ~ ' ` ,~ ` ; E ~+. CITY FIRE DEPT: ~ ~,~ CITY BUILDING DEPT: { ~, ~ ,I,,•~~~ CITY WATER DEPT: ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ CITY SEWER DEPT: ~.~ '~` {~ F' MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT 1'~ . its .~ ~ ;.- , MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ~ ~+ F ~ :'~ ~ r` -~ ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY D1STI ~ . ,~ SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY ;:'. , ` _,~-- CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ~ '1 ~~ I' ~i li G. ' ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~ '; ~ye ~ auk- -~ ,~~ .. _r-, ~ -~' 1~ ' :~ ~ ~ ~ k3' ! 3'. `i i ~~ r ~ 1/t/" F i _ YYY 4~ U ~}_ ~t ~'/ (~ ~~ VJ ` Contacted: Date: Phone: Mat~lals presented at pubNc meetings shad become properly of the Clty of Meridian. ~ ~ ~. Mr. Kenny Bowers, Fire Chief 8 January 2001 - Page 2 For the exterior slab it was anticipated that this would require only minor excavation beyond the required pavement section. However, the interior slabs, due to higher elevations, required up to 2.5 feet of additional excavation beyond that originally planned. An alternative proposed for the over excavation was the installation of a stabilization fabric over the exposed clay soil. The fabric would prevent the movement of saturated clay soils upward into the underlying granular fill of the structural pavement section due to heavy wheel loads. With input from MTI, ZGA developed a Request for Proposal describing the interior truck bays and exterior east/west apron areas where unsuitable materials were to be addressed. K-J Corporation, Inc. submitted their costs ($20,220) and a change order was prepared and submitted to the City of Meridian on 21 December 2000 for review and approval to proceed. Because of the cost, the City requested a meeting to discuss the matter in more detail. That meeting took place on 2 January. Unfortunately, through internal miscommunication within K-J Corporation, Inc, the unsuitable material within the truck bays and east apron areas was removed prior to the meeting and obtaining the City's approval. At the meeting all issues, costs and options where thoroughly discussed. It was decided that we would limit the area of over excavation to that already removed. K-J Corporation, Inc. recognized their error in communication and in the spirit of cooperation volunteered to install, at no cost to the City, the stabilization fabric in the west apron area. By deleting the additional over excavation, this effort has reduced the change order cost by $4,200. It will. cost K-J Corporation approximately $1,450 to install the stabilization fabric which is "added value" to the City and completes the protection requirements in those sensitive areas recommended by MTI. Throughout this episode we believe that everyone has been cooperative and sensitive to the best long-term interest of the City and Fire Department. If you have any questions or need additional information in this regard please contact Danny Little or myself. Very ZGA Architects and 1 h mas G?bal P Z:ss • cc: Job File/Div. A Jack Young/KJ C David Cram/MTI Chad JonesB & Steve Ca11CC r -. January 11, 2001 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 16, 2001 APPLICANT Mayor's Department -Mayor Corrie ITEM No. 4-C-1 REQUEST Appointment of Parks and Recreation Commissioner AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN- SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: COMMENTS ~~~~ ~ ~' `~, .JI ~b BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Materials presented at pybtic meetings shad become property of the City of Meridian. • December 29, 2000 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 2, 2001 APPLICANT Mayor Cowie ITEM NO. 1-C-1 REQUEST Appointment of Parks and Recreation Commissioner AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: G~~P'~~~ ~' cC`~ C~Q'~ OTHER: Contacted; Date: Phone: Maferiala presented of pubNc meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~ • December 17, 2000 Mayor Robert Come City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave. 83642 Dear Mr. Mayor REcE~D DEC 2 7 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN Over the last 3 '/z years it's been a pleasure to serve on the Parks and Recreation Commission. During this period the commission has been able to accomplish many items which I'm proud to have been involved and would like to continue. Therefore, in accordance with the commission ordinance I'm writing to request that you consider reappointing me to the Parks and Recreation Commission for another terms. Again, it's been a pleasure especially the last two as president of the commission: Sin rely, David P: Moe Cc: Meridian City Council Tom Kuntz, Parks Director Parks and Recreation Commission ~ ~ ~cE~D DEC 2 7 2p0U CITY OF MERIDIAN December 21, 2000 Mayor Robert Come City of Meridian 33E. Idaho Ave. 83642 Daar Mayor Come EnGosed you will find copies of all applicants for the open Panics 8 Recreation Commission seats along with a letter from me requesting an additional term on the commission. Wdh the problems we've had filling these seats I was glad to see multiple applicants with so much interest to serve on the commission. The full commission reviewed the applicants and listed four to interview. The four that were selected are listed below. Richard Budge, Bruce MacCoy, Daniel Hawkins, Creg Steele The interviews were held 12/14/00 with all commission members exGuding myself in attendance. Due to a previous appointment Crag Steele was unable to attend. After discussions with both Jim Keller and Sheri Baker they stated that since all three candidates interviewed well and Creg Steele had been recommended to serve once before any of the four would be a good choice. Therefore, on behalf of the Parks 8 Recreation Commission we ask that you recommend two of the four names listed above to the City Council for their approval. Due to holidays falling on the third Monday of the month in both January and February I believe we have scheduled our next meeting for the second Monday in January. It would be nice to have the full commission in place at that time. Thank you for your time in this matter. If you have any questions or comment please don"t hesitate to contact me at your convince. Sincerely, / _ ~~ David Moe City of Meridian Parks & Recreation Commission Cc: Meridian City Council Tom Kuntz, Panics Diredor~ • • January 11, 2001 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 16, 2001 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 6 REQUEST Swear in New Meridian City Police Officers AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: d~ CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: ~~,.~/ 1(~S QJ CITY SEWER DEPT: 1I~'~ ~ U" MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: - ~ ~ t~' MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: : ti C~ ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: G ~~` SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY ~~ ,/. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: (,,l . ~S. NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: - ~, ~ i~ ~ ~~ SETTLERS IRRIGATION: , J ~,~~ ~~" J Y" IDAHO POWER: ~/~/ ~, CC" ,~/~ US WEST: V ~~ INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: `( ~1 (1," `v J BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: ~~~ ~ Contacted: Date: Phone: OTHER: Materials presented al pubic meetings shah become properly of the City ~ Meridian. A ~ CUlJ~tY RECQRtIE? ~. pAYt~k HAV~,RRD ~~~~M. t~a,~o ~~ ZQ01 FE - I P~ 2~ 0 9 CITY OF MERIDIAN R~DEp - REQi~ ``'T ~F" FEE EP _..__ ~.. ~010~~~~5 ORDINANCE NO. ©C~ ~~~ AN ORDINANCE FINDING THAT CERTAIN LAND TO BE KNOWN AS AUTUMN FAIRE SUBDMSION LIES CONTIGUOUS OR ADJACENT TO THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; AND FINDING THAT THE OWNER HAS MADE A REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION IN WRITING TO THE COUNCIL; AND THAT SAID LAND BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AND ZONING DESIGNATED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-4); AND DECLARING THAT SAID LAND, BY PROPER LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BE A PART OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, ORDERS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ADD SAID PROPERTY TO THE OFFICIAL MAPS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO; AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE .AREAS TO BE ANNEXED WITH ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AUDITOR, TREASURER AND ASSESSOR, AND THE STATE TAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, PURSUANT TO IDAHO CODE SECTION 50-223 AND SECTION 63-2215. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. FINDINGS: That the following described land is contiguous and adjacent to the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation to the City of Meridian, Idaho, by the owner of said Property to-wit: ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ-00-009) - 1 ~ ~ `1, -~.. Apart of the SW 1/4 NE 1/4, and a part of the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 and a part of Government Lot 1 of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the NE corner of said Government Lot 1 (Section corner common to sections 3, 4, 33 and 34), said corner monumented with a 3 inch diameter brass disk; Thence N. 89°18'37" W., a distance of 1319.23 feet along the northerly boundary of said Government Lot 1 to the NW corner of said Government Lot 1, said corner monumented with a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin; Thence S. 0°42'02" W., a distance of 1374.25 feet along the westerly boundary of said Government Lot 1 to the NE corner of said SW 1/4 NE 1/4, (NE 1/16 corner), said corner monumented with a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin; Thence N. 89°24'35" W., a distance of 758.06 feet along the northerly boundary of said SW 1/4 NE 1/4 to a 1/z inch diameter iron pin; Thence S. 0°12'36" W., a distance of 1324.11 feet to a point on the southerly boundary of said SW 1/4 NE 1/4, said point monumented with a 1/z inch diameter iron pin; Thence S. 89°21'39" E., a distance of 746.75 feet along the southerly boundary of said SW 1/4 NE 1/4 to the SW corner of said to SE 1/4 NE 1/4, said corner monumented with a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin; Thence S. 89°22'22" E. a distance of 1079.09 feet along the southerly boundary of said SE 1/4 NE 1/4 to a point; Thence N. 57°57'53" W., a distance of 506.10 feet to a point; Thence S. 89°18'33" E., a distance of 675.00 feet parallel with the northerly boundary of said Government Lot 1 to a point on the easterly boundary of said SE 1/4 NE 1/4; Thence N. 0°38'21" E., a distance of 2124.52 feet along the easterly boundaries of said SE 1/4 NE 1/4 and Government Lot 1 to a point; Thence N. 89°17'59" W., a distance of 290.40 feet to a point; ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ-00-009) - 2 • • Thence N. 0°38'21" E., a distance of 150.00 feet parallel with the easterly boundary of said Government Lot 1 to a point; Thence S. 89°17'59" E., a distance of 290.40 feet to a point on the easterly boundary of said Government Lot 1; Thence N. 0°38'21" E., a distance of 160.00 feet along the easterly boundary of said Government Lot 1 to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 100.909 acres more or less. Also, this parcel is subject to all easements and rights-of--way of record or implied. SECTION 2: That the above-described real property be, and the same is hereby annexed and made a part of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. SECTION 3: That the real property herein by this ordinance annexed to the City of Meridian hereinabove described shall be zoned Low Density Residential District (R-4). SECTION 4: That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, comprehensive plan and all official maps depicting the boundaries of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 5: The zoning designation set forth in Section 3 of this ordinance is subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Development Agreement by and between the City of Meridian and the owner of the land described in Section 1 dated the /-~ 200/ ~~ day of ~/G~~ , z`~99~, and that the uses are to be developed under the planned unit development process and conditional use permit process. ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ-00-009) - 3 • ~ SECTION 6: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 7: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8: The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner plainly and clearly designating the boundaries of the City of Meridian, including the lands herein annexed, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to-wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho, all in compliance with Idaho Code §63-2215 and §50- 223. ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ-00-009) - 4 • PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this of , g96~2o0 ~ !6 ~aay APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this l 6 day of GfinGi Qii. , -~$6~Z OD / . D A~Y$~- ~'~l-r~ ~c~v~ c.~C ATTE ~~ ~~, CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO,) County of Ada. SS. ~ ~BAL ~~r~~~l iii#i A'i 4~~k~t*i~ Zook On this ~ ~lI ~h day of ~}"G~V~4h.~ , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the CITY of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day anc~~aerfi~rst above written. e'e t Ft. _ T T ~~_ (SEAL) ;~; ~ ~r": ~ ~' ;~~ • ~~ '~jp~ osa `` = "-'IC 0 ~ ~ •~:~OFID~:•• ••,..... NOTARY LI OR IDAHO RESIDING AT: ~f~ ~ Q. ~/l. ~~ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:(o MSG\Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Autumn Faire Sub AZ and PP\AZOrd ANNEXATION AND ZONINi~ ORDINANCE (AZ-00-009) - 5 • • CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To: The Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor of Ada County, and The State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk, of the City of Meridian, Ada County, State of Idaho, do hereby certify that the attached copy of Ordinance No. ~~'~~~ passed by the City Council of the City of Meridian, on the day of f- ~Ll2G~c-~ ov ( -~66~-, is a true and correct copy of the original of said document which is in the care, custody and control of the City Clerlc of the City of Meridian. R,~+-~ --~~r"~ R~ C°~f 1 " '~ B~i~ y ~~ :~ T ~~ ~, v~,~ STATE OF ID~~ , ~~,s w~ y~~~~9fa-Na, wt+i4~~s~ County of Ada, /z2~ ~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. On this (p~ day of ~NU~~, in the year 2000, before me, ~ ~ ~t,yy~ , a Notary Public, appeared WILLIAM . BERG, J ., known or identified to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Idaho that executed the said instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of the City of Meridian. v~ s W '~~ T~~ .~ , :01,9 ~B_LI~'p•~'• ®°~~~'. --.. .~ r. ~ • 1' ' Notary Publi r I o . ^ • Commission Expires: ~ ~"~ '~~ .• . msg\Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Autumn Faire Sub AZ and PP\CertificationOfClerkOrd CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AZ-00-009 • • 5 ~ ~ 0 ~ g o ~ Z `' 0 _~ Q8~ ~ ~ ~ w~ v Z ~ Z W i~ W ~ ~ ~ oFo Z~ o W a~ z pia 0 Z ~ ~ v w Ww U ~~ D ~ s O Q ~~. ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ U w Z O n y _ ~ U a ~ O s W N ~ O C7 Z Z ORSR H Z W Z ~ a m ~~ ~ m ~ x '" a A 3.LZ O 09 ~BE.OONN E N ,ZS'4ZLZ ~ Q~ 3.LZ~8E.OON ~ ~ ? `- W h a y.` ^° dq~ S~ C 6' ,00'OSL Z m $ ~h1 ~ w 3.LZ~8Eo00N w ~7 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ygy tl m Z ^ ~ ~ ~ off 11Y tl3HM ~ ~ U W ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ y sa'v~Ea M.7A,Z4.OOS ~ w `~ 3 ~ '~ m ~ ~ N E L N~ Of ~ Of w Z d L'6ZE L M.BE~ZL.OOS a y I m N _~ CJ 5.3 m 0 s ~ N ~ o ~ ~ T rn co ~~ o° c.i _ ~", m B NSILVEp C .-« ~ C7 ~g ~ m ~ ~ 3 ~`" ~ ~ ~ D °~ do O Z ~ Z ~m a D~ ~ ~ m =?m w tnz o~ ~ m ~ Z ~ ~ O N8 Z ~• S00°12'~°W 1324.11' • O N00°38'21"E 2124.52' N A W Cn S00°42'02"W 1374.25' m n Z -P • Z ca o cD o0 N W W N00°38'21"E z 150.00' N c0 ~ ~ O V O ~ N00°3£ N ~ X160. O ~~ o ~++ m n ~_ Q Z w m p ~z z -~ z z~ G7 m -i O z m n 0 z ~l . RECEIVED JAN 16 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN DELINQUENCY FOR TURN OFF SCHEDULED FOR 01/24/01 MAYOR: This is to inform you in writing, if you choose to, you have the right to a predetermination hearing at 7:30 P.M. Tuesday, January 16, 2001, before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and to defend the claim made by this City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on January 24,2001, unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash delinquency? (No response.) MAYOR: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn-off list is $56,093.17. ~ i CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List-council Page: 1 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:48pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer.Cust No = {<} 9900000 Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10131/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 4.1204.2 KNIGHT, TIMOTHY 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - 12/22/2000 34.18 - 51.2649.1 A SHADE BETTER PAINTING 146.83 92.14 54.69 - - 01/08/2001 56.89 - 4.0868.2 ABLE, MICHAEL 85.47 45.36 40.11 - - 12/20/2000 42.57 - 74.2507.1 ACHD .575.10 - - 575.10 - 10/11/2000 113.40 - 34.1884.1 ALLEN, DONALD 101.60 73.34 28.26 - - 11 /15/2000 150.00 -none 74.2452.1 ALLEN, RICHARD L. 79.27 36.42 42.85 - - 12/20/2000 49.00 -none 21.0184.3 ALLEN, ROBERT & MARCELLA 143.62 116.28 27.34 - - 31.3422.1 ALLEN, TIM 79.24 49.05 30.19 - - 12/20/2000 54.00 -none 20.1496.1 ACCRED, GLENN & CHANA 86.85 32.86 27.61 26.38 - 10/10/2000 24.08 -none 22.1046.2 ALVERSON, MARK 103.55 58.30 45.25 - - 11/15!2000 73.33- 19.6556.2 AMAR, STEVE 61.84 32.86 28.98 - - 11/24!2000 28.98 - 74.2672.1 AMOUREUX, RAMON 92.57 41.70 50.87 - - 11/21/2000 54.56 -none 72.0222.1 ANDERSON, BRAD 84.33 40.25 44.08 - - 12/15/2000 44.08 -none 35.0057.2 ANDERSON, CHRISTY 130.73 79.41 51.32 - - 12/01!2000 46.40 - 21:2254.1 ANDERSON, DAWN 66.76 39.15 27.61 - - 11!17/2000 17.61 -none 20.1704.1 ANDERSON, DOUG 49.98 13.42 36.56 - - 11/20/2000 63.62 -none 33.3572.1 ANDERSON, KATHY 68.13 37.92 30.21 - - 12/04/2000 35.86 -none 22.1482.1 ANDERSON, LYLE D. 161.11 90.92 70.19 - - 11/29/2000 155.22 -none 21.1714.1 ANDERSON, SCOTT 134.61 39.07 42.85 52.69 - 11/06/2000 65.07 -none 21.2070.1 ANKENMAN, MICHAEL A 109.84 63.02 46.82 - - 11/29/2000 90.03 -none 2.6300.1 ANSON, PATRICIA 107.41 61.85 45.39 .17 - 11/27/2000 50.00 -none 34.1160.1 APARICIO, STEVE & STACEY 109.84 61.85 47.99 - - 12/01 /2000 60.29 -none 46.4750.1 APPLEBEE'S 2,810.58 1,251.47 1,337.46 221.65 - 12/13/2000 238.74 - 68.0070.1 ARES, TONY 141.48 54.08 40.25 46.40 .75 11/29/2000 42.00 -none 2.2110.1 ARMAS, SAMUEL 349.61 77.28 77.12 117.10 78.11 10/16/2000 91.00 -none 42.1988.2 ARMSTRONG, GARY & LAURA 97.26 56.93 40.33 - - 12/20/2000 47.71 - 53.0700.1 ARNOLD MACHINERY 941.37 313.79 313.79 313.79 - 10/24/2000 138.59 -none 50.1626.2 ARNZEN FUNERAL SERVICE, IN( 100.95 48.56 52.39 - - 11/17/2000 60.66 - 19.1677.1 ASHFORD GREENS CLUB HOUS 85.62 32.86 26.38 26:38 - 11/24/2000 25.31 - 51.2620.1 ASHTON, JAY & LAFAYNE 63.36 31.68 31.68 - - 11/21/2000 31.68 -none 21.2212.1 ASMUSEN, RICH & MELISSA 125.00 69.43 55.57 - - 12/15/2000 53.11 -none 51.3370.1 ATWOOD, CINDI 64.25 34.04 30.21 - - 11/24/2000 74.21 -none 4.1770.2 AUSTIN, TERRY 74.69 34.09 40.05 .55 - 12/19/2000 70.80 - 64.3040.2 AVERY, WILLIAM 85.91 49.27 36.64 - - 12/22/2000 35.41 - 51.0180.1 B M C, WEST 67.52 33.76 33.76 - - 12/20/2000 33.76 -none 69.1620.1 BACHMAN, MICHAEL L. 121.83 47.91 73.92 - - 12/20/2000 93.70 -none 21.2736.1 BAILEY, MICHELLE 130.61 46.73 36.56 47.32 - 11/28/2000 50.00 -none 3.0326.1 BAIN, RAND 217.38 93.38 62.00 62.00 - 11/29/2000 70.69 -none 21.0016.1 BAIRD, ANN MARIE 89.30 50.42 38.88 - - 11/20/2000 46.26 -none 34.1860.1 BAISLEY, TERRENCE 117.78 64.59 53.19 - - 11 /22/2000 51.96 -none 32.1370.1 BAKER, C. SHANE & HOLLY 84.54 45.44 39.10 - - 11/24/2000 37.87 -none 31.3300.1 BALL, STEVE 74.56 37.92 36.64 - - 11/22/2000 37.87 -none 33.3626.2 BALL, TERESA 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - 12/21/2000 44.18 - 42.1202.1 BANNER, SCOTT 64.00 35.24 28.76 - - 11/27/2000 28.76 -none 69.0590.1 BAPTISTE, MONTGOMERY 201.35 136.00 65.35 - - 12/20/2000 60.00 -none 1.2790.3 BARINSKY, CYNTHIA 99.98 42.76 57.22 - - 12/14/2000 57.22 - 33.1862.2 BARKER, JOHN 98.96 58.30 40.66 - - 11/20/2000 40.00 - 50.3794.1 BARKER, SCOTT 75.60 37.87 37.73 - - 11 /20/2000 32.81 -none 32.0744.1 BARNARD, WILLIAM 79.19 47.82 31.37 - - 12/22/2000 50.00 -none 15.0046.1 BARNETT, SHERRY 71.96 41.75 30.21 - - 12/20/2000 28.98 - 21.1894.1 BARNHART, CLINTON 83.33 51.79 31.54 - - 11/29/2000 50.00 -none *'* in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List-council _ Page: 2 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:48pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10!31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 50.1912.2 BARNHART, RICK 115.43 42.59 36.42 36.42 - 11/29/2000 31.58 - 22.1740.2 BARNHART, RYAN 105.98 42.86 28.98 30.21 3.93 11/29/2000 50.00- 43.2448.2 BARON, KONA & MICHELLE 92.20 51.87 40.33 - - 12/20/2000 36.64 - 74.2822.1 BARR, KENNETH 324.38 109.19 84.84 130.35 - 11/28/2000 136.58 -none 68.0248.1 BARRETT, DONALD 30.88 - 6.48 24.40 - 10/12/2000 24.08 -none 1.2110.1 BARROETABENA, PHYLLIS 93.43 48.99 44.44 - - 11/22/2000 109.95 -none 42.3068.1 BAUDER, KEN 57.88 37.70 20.18 - - 01/02/2001 20.00 -none 2.0360.1 BEACH, DEVIN 99.86 59.53 40.33 - - 12/06/2000 37.87 -none 46.0258.1 BEAMGUARD, LISA 64.00 35.24 28.76 - - 11/17/2000 55.14 -none 31.3400.2 BEAN, DONOVAN 144.46 35.24 28.76 28.76 51.70 12/13/2000 50.00 - 14.5010.2 BEAUCANNON, JUSTIN 87.83 49.19 32.45 6.19 - 11/20/2000 25.00 - 34.0942.1 BECK, JIM 107.24 65.68 41.56 - - 12/15/2000 41.56 -none 32.0950.1 BECKER, NICHOLAS 91.90 58.08 33.82 - - 12/20/2000 61.33 -none 46.0448.1 BEERY, LON 118.60 32.86 35.41 50.33 - 11/27/2000 70.99 -none 31.1004.1 BEHNER, ROBERT 180.69 60.42 49.28 70.99 - 11/29/2000 76.00 -none 21.1934.1 BEHRENDT, DARICE 69.20 35.24 33.96 - - 12/04/2000 42.57 -none 33.1828.1 BELL, RONALD & JULIE 83.31 51.87 31.44 - - 12/20/2000 33.90 -none 51.3568.1 BENNET, PHILIP & CAROLYN 55.02 26.38 28.64 - - 12/07/2000 12.96 - 33.2772.2 BENNETT, GREG 88.23 54.19 34.04 - - 12/12/2000 31.58 - 46.0836.1 BENNETT, GREG 119.27 40.52 49.89 28.86 - 01/05!2001 50.00 -none 46.0834.2 BENNETT, GREG 75.79 40.38 35.41 - - 12/20/2000 36.22 - 2.3600.1 BENNETT, HOWARD 67.77 39.15 28.62 - - 11/27/2000 45.00 -none 19.6688.1 BENNETT, MASON 136.12 56.85 40.25 39.02 - 11/16/2000 50.33 -none 51.3570.2 BENNETT, PHILIP 5522 26.38 28.84 - - 11/17/2000 26.38 - 33.2596.1 BENTLEY, A 108.61 65.82 42.79 - - 11/16/2000 48.94 -none 31.0008.2 BERGLOFF, JOHN & CHRISTINA 200.36 83.50 116.86 - - 11/15/2000 290.62 - 21.3076.1 BERRY, GALE 84.99 28.76 11.40 44.83 - 10/13/2000 73.28 -none 32.0656.1 BEVINGTON, H LARUE 114.48 61.85 52.63 - - 11/21/2000 57.30 -none 2.1860.1 BEVINGTON, H LARUE 62.93 35.32 27.61 - - 11/27/2000 56.06 -none 74.3296.1 BIENAPFL, ROB & CARMEN 111.60 36.42 32.59 42.59 - 11/27/2000 8.77 -none 22.2344.1 BINGOECHEA, RAQUEL 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/22/2000 52.92 - norie 74.2724.1 BISHOP, CALVIN 109.61 44.08 65.53 - - 12/20/2000 100.00 -none 31.3244.2 BISHOP, GABE 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - 12/01/2000 34.18 - 22.1342.2 BISIG, JOSEPH W 101.09 56.93 44.16 - - 12/19/2000 40.47 - 3.0308.1 BITTNER, MICHAEL 84.38 45.36 39.02 - - 11/28/2000 83.04 -none 33.2600.1 BLACKHURST, SCOTT 64.30 36.69 27.61 - - 11/27/2000 52.92 -none 2.4200.1 BLAKELY, CLAUDE JAMES 64.00 35.24 28.76 - - 11/24!2000 55.14 -none 4.1294.2 BLASER, GLENN 68.27 32.86 35.41 - - 12/11/2000 34.18 - 33.2730.1 BLEAZARD, BARRETT 70.59 42.98 27.61 - - 11/17/2000 26:54 -none 2.1580.2 BLESSENGER, RONNIE & HAZEL 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - - 21.3290.2 BOBKO, RAYMOND 209.58 110.58 99.00 - - 01/01/2001 100.37 - 74.2332.2 BOBKO, RAYMOND 100.74 55.57 45.17 - - 11/20/2000 97.80 - 51.0506.1 BOGGIS, CONNIE 58.42 29.21 29.21 - - 12/19/2000 30.44 -none 31.0512.1 BOKMAN, HELEN 125.44 67.05 58.39 - - 11/24/2000 120.63 -none 52.0246.1 BOLO'S PUB & EATERY 713.45 188.74 207.89 192.57 124.25 12/21/2000 207.89 -none 21.2794.1 BOMER, MICHAEL 93.13 56.85 36.28 - - 12/20/2000 31.36 -none 19.0090.1 BOND, ERIC 75.65 44.21 31.44 - - 11/24/2000 31.44 -none 35.0078.2 BOND, THOMAS & LAUREEN 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - - 4.1984.1 BORGER, KEVIN 81.78 47.96 33.82 - - 11/16/2000 63.34 -none 42.3036.1 BOSIO, LAWRENCE 66.46 36.47 29.99 - - 11/28/2000 28.76 -none 34.1880.1 BOUR, SHANNON 180.57 62.01 50.59 67.97 - 11/29/2000 93.11 -none 72.0218.1 BOVEE, RONALD 88.74 47.91 40.83 - - 12/12/2000 40.00 -none 51.4310.1 BOW ER INVESTMENTS, LLP 56.99 26.38 30.61 - - 11/22/2000 65.00- 2.2588.2 BOWERS, BRUCE 73.03 35.24 37.79 - - 01/03/2001 15.94- 32.1372.2 BOYD, JAMES 81.12- 46.81 34.31 12/20/2000 35:00 - "' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 3 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:49pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11!30/2000 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 21.3068.1 BOYDSTUN, PATRICK & JUDY 121.76 46.69 31.44 43.63 - 11 /29/2000 60.00 -none 74.3796.1 BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER 55.80 26.38 28.98 .44 - 11/14/2000 59.51 -none 5.0214.1 BRADY, ROGER 85.29 43.85 41.44 - - 11/02/2000 295.97 -none 51.0706.2 BRANDY, LORELI 52.59 30.21 22.38 - - 12/20/2000 30.00 - 69.1576.1 BRAYMAN, BRUCE & SUSAN 124.83 80.00 44.83 - - 11/22/2000 31.30 -none 50.4272.1 BREEDLOVE, ANGELA 106.10 68.51 37.59 - - 11/22/2000 38.82 -none 21.0178.1 BREINHOLT, AARON 69.67 34.09 35.58 - - 12/19!2000 50.00 -none 34.0420.1 BRENEMAN, JEFFERY 88.51 50.64 37.87 - - 11/27/2000 162.32 -none 5.0264.1 BRENNAN, TERRENCE 293.06 219.27 73.79 - - 12/20/2000 107.00 -none 1.0800.1 BREWER, SID & SHELLY 64.30 36.69 27.61 - - 11/29!2000 40.07 -none 2.3702.1 BRINEGAR, E.E. 55.62 32:86 22.76 - - 12/22/2000 40.00 -none 2.3712.2 BRINEGAR, E.E. 67.83 39.07 28.76 - - 11/27/2000 58.83- 4.1674.1 BRINKERHOFF, JOHN 177.49 104.99 68.15 4.35 - 12/19/2000 100.00 -none 1.0491.1 BROADWAY ESTATES CONDOM 22.68 - 22.68 - - 11/28/2000 17.11 -none 19.4456.1 BROOKS FULLER HOMES 212.74 122.92 33.68 56.14 - 11/27/2000 67.68 -none 21.2674.1 BROOKS, JOHN 96.96 68.20 28.76 - - 12/22/2000 38.60 -none 74.3010.1 BROTZMAN, HENRY 104.71 55.57 49.14 - - 11!29/2000 95.90 -none 33.3762.1 BROWN, DOMONIC 71.82 42.98 28.84 - - 12/05/2000 26.38 -none 50.1910.1 BROWN, GROVER 57.28 28.76 28.52 - - 11/20/2000 29.00 -none 2.6180.3 BRUNER, LISA 95.90 42.98 34.18 18.74 - - 34.2736.1 BRUTSMAN, RONALD 138.85 92.23 46.62 - - 11/29/2000 67.44 -none 31.3306.1 BRYANT, JAMIE 157.85 88.54 35.27 34.04 - 11/30/2000 138.75 -none 74.3226.1 BUCHSIEB, GWENDOLYN 79.13 36.42 42.71 - - 12/26/2000 40.25 -none 34.1844.1 BUFFAT, STEPHEN 142.15 71.99 70.16 - - 12/20/2000 78.77 -none 21.1486.1 BUNCH, LAWRENCE 76.94 42.76 33.82 .36 - 11/28/2000 38.74 -none 33.1852.1 BUNDY, DOYLE 84.96 32.86 28.98 23.12 - 11/24/2000 35.00 -none 19.5494.4 BURCHFIELD, DARRELL 89.60 46.81 42.79 - - 11/27/2000 69.75- 19.4438.3 BURCHFIELD, DARRELL 82.08 42.98 39.10 - - 11/14/2000 78.36 - 32.1546.4 BURCHFIELD, DARRELL 83.45 46.81 36.64 - - 12/21/2000 35.41 - 19.6510.2 BURKETT, MARK, BRYAN & CAS 117.69 64.25 37.65 15.79 - 11/29!2000 50.00 - 74.2440.1 BURNETT, BRENDA S 59.19 30.21 28.98 - - 11/22/2000 34.10 -none 65.0620.1 BURNHAM, JACK 60.47 34.09 26.38 - - 11/15/2000 26.38 -none 2.4890.2 BURNS, EMMETT 160.74 54.25 45.17 61.32 - 11/27/2000 148.47 - 74.3668.2 BURRIS, STANTON & JANICE 65.32 28.76 36.56 - - 11/20/2000 71.97 - 5.0678.1 BURT, MARK A 71.82 37.92 33.90 - - 11/27!2000 135.22 -none 42.2460.1 BURTON, JACK 98.35 63.22 35.13 - - 12/27/2000 43.74 -none 4.2308.1 BUTTERFIELD, CHARLES & TON 183.40 99.37 84.03 - - 12/05/2000 98.41 -none 34.0696.1 BUTTRAM, DEANNA 67.99 39.15 28.84 - - 12/04/2000 38.68 -none 4.1842.1 BUXTON, MICHAEL 95.87 59.45 36.42 - - 11/28/2000 59.79 -none 51.0298.2 BYE, DEANNA 82.31 34.04 48.27 - - 12/12/2000 48.27 - 33.4162.2 C&R BUILDERS 74.70 40.52 34.18 - - 12/14/2000 34.18 - 50.0724.1 C.F.I. INVESTMENTS 73.38 41.70 31.68 - - 11/21/2000 54.00- 21.0522.1 CALW ELL, MARC 69.95 40.30 29.65 - - 12/20/2000 26.00 -none 34.0990.1 CAMPBELL, DOUGLAS 103.69 54.33 49.36 - - 11/20/2000 56.74 -none 4.1140.1 CAMPBELL, MICHAEL 82.87 49.19 33.68 - - 11/22/2000 31.22 -none 21.2664.1 CAMPBELL, ROLLAND 64.00 35.24 28.76 - - 12/11 /2000 58.44 -none 31.0010.1 CANDACE ADKINS 113.99 64.75 49.24 - - 12/14/2000 45.55 -none 1.3690.1 CANFOR USA CORPORATION 504.16 293.75 210.41 - - 11!20/2000 271.39 -none 4.1796.1 CAPRAI, JOHN & SARAH 113.61 59.31 54.30 - - 12/11/2000 70.25 -none 32.0884.1 CARLSON, DEBORAH J. 81.94 32.86 49.08 - - 12/20/2000 50.31 -none 20.1634.1 C;4RLSON, PATRICIA 90.41 44.35 46.06 - - 11/29/2000 26.38 -none 34.1808.2 CARPENTER, DOUGLAS 89.44 50.42 39.02 - - 11/28/2000 95.34 - 65.0688.1 CARPENTER, GAIL 85.61 49.19 36.42 - - 12/20/2000 33.96 -none 2.4340.1 CARRIER, RICHARD 98.63 56.93 41.70 - - 12/20/2000 59.08 -none 31.3394.1 CARROLL, PHILIP R. 27.70 40.38 37.32 - - 12/20/2000 45.00 -none "' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List-council Page: 4 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:49pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11130/2000 10/31/2000 09/3012000 Date Amount Msg 31.2252.1 CASADY, WARREN A. 104.76 51.65 53.11 - - 11/15/2000 49.42 -none 3.4001.1 CASCADE BUILDERS 455.89 - - 31.06 424.83 - 2.5130.1 CASPERSEN, MAUREEN K 83.31 48.04 35.27 - - 11/20/2000 102.84 -none 2.2596.2 CAUDILL, KEVIN 127.79 54.25 43.94 29.60 - 12/14/2000 43.94 - 32.0446.1 CAVINESS, WILLIAM A. 96.47 42.98 53.49 - - 12/15/2000 60.00 -none 48.1610.1 CB FINANCIAL DEV. L.L.C. 456.09 269.70 186.39 - - 12/05/2000 220.86 - 33.2620.1 CECIL, ODETTE 106.96 66.85 40.11 - - 11 /29/2000 74.15 -none 35.0011.2 CELEYA, ANN 90.67 51.65 39.02 - - 11/15/2000 80.58 - 33.4260.2 CERIELLO, MICHAEL & ANGELA 67.34 32.86 34.48 - - - 42.2582.1 CHAPMAN, LORRI 140.70 55.36 37.51 47.83 - 11 /29/2000 53.58 -none 22.0848.1 CHAPMAN, THOMAS 296.39 242.61 53.78 - - 12/21 /2000 157.29 -none 21.2658.1 CHAPPELL, ANTHONY 88.53 39.07 38.74 10.72 - 01 /02/2001 75.00 -none 42.2387.1 CHATEAU MEADOWS HOME AS: 40.50 - 40.50 - - 11/21/2000 56.70 -none 42.1915.1 CHATEAU MEADOWS HOMEOW 58.32 - 58.32 - - 11/21/2000 69.66 -none 32.0986.1 CHATTERTON, KELLY 60.47 32.86 27.61 - - 12/18/2000 69.43 -none 21.0218.1 CHEN, LILT & YIZE 92.04 45.32 44.97 1.75 - 01/11/2001 36.38 -none 65.0668.1 CHENEY, ELWOOD 79.14 26.38 26.38 26.38 - 11/13/2000 24.08 -none 2.6100.1 CHENEY, STEVEN 93.44 55.70 37.73 .01 - 12/20/2000 16.27 -none 50.1774.1 CHERRY'S BUILT IN VACS 747.68 343.20 404.48 - - 12/18/2000 471.81 -none 52.0292.1 CHEVRON STATION 1,328.76 675.87 652.89 - - 11/22/2000 756.30 -none 74.2532.2 CHILTON, BRYAN 77.06 46.42 30.64 - - 12/19/2000 72.00 - 15.0047.2 CHRISTENSEN, DAVID 112.58 65.82 46.76 - - 11/24/2000 44.30 - 34.1204.1 CHRISTOFFERSON, ANDREW 437.47 44.21 31.58 361.68 - 01/04/2001 109.04 -none 32.1278.1 CHURCH, LARRY 270.64 163.08 107.56 - - 11/21/2000 177.89 -none 51.3014.1 CIOP ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. 166.39 33.76 75.89 56.74 - 11/02/2000 118.02 -none 33.4344.1 CIRELLI, MARK 90.97 51.87 39.10 - - 12/20/2000 46.48 -none 35.0401.2 CLARK, BRIAN 97.26 65.60 31.66 - - 11/17/2000 33.00 - 31.1054.1 CLARK, DAVID 113.67 59.39 54.28 - - 12/18/2000 54.28 -none 31.0162.1 CLARK, JAMES & KAREN 138.16 70.74 67.42 - - 11/24/2000 66.19 -none 31.3056.2 CLARK, RANDY 69.36 37.92 31.44 - - 11!20/2000 46.13 - 2.2800.3 CLEMENT, MICHAEL 79.62 41.75 37.87 - - 11/21/2000 90.66 - 21.2214.2 CLEVELAND, RICHARD & KAREN 83.15 45.36 37.79 - - 11/27/2000 16.55 - 5.0344.1 CLIFF, DWIGHT 65.23 35.24 29.99 - - 11/27/2000 119.10 -none 34.1122.1 CLIFF, RANDY 82.22 44.21 38.01 - - 11/21/2000 38.01 -none 52.0374.1 CM CO INC 810.61 601.72 208.89 - - 11/16/2000 375.72 - 74.2432.1 COFFEY, KENNETH & DONNA 117.68 32.59 33.96 51.13 - 11/06/2000 111.08 -none 21.1766.1 COFFMAN, RICK K. 116.41 64.45 51.96 - - 12/20/2000 58.11 -none 50.2122.1 COLE, DANIEL & RENEE 79.40 40.25 38.68 .27 - 12/04/2000 35.19 -none 74.3360.1 COLE, DEBRA 72.58 38.76 33.82 - - 11/29/2000 62.80 -none 4.2048.1 COLE, PATRICIA 80.41 41.53 38.88 - - 11/28/2000 57.33 -none 74.3074.1 COLLINS, JAMES & DENISE 94.59 47.91 46.68 - - 11/28/2000 46.68 -none 22.1744.1 COLLINS, JENNIFER 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 12/20/2000 40.07 - 74.2350.3 COLLINS, LEONARD 95.97 26.38 34.18 35.41 - 10/13/2000 36.80 - 2.1650.1 COLLINS, TERRY 77.76 38.15 39.61 - - 12/21/2000 40.41 -none 74.3650.2 COLSON,CHRIS 104.74 36.38 34.18 34.18 - 11/29/2000 36.80- 51.4170.2 COLSON,HOWARD 162.23 135.85 26.38 - - 11/29/2000 64.15- 31.3328.1 CONKLIN, BARBARA 61.70 32.86 28.84 - - 11/22/2000 42.37 -none 21.0022.1 CONRAD, STEVEN 97.91 49.19 48.72 - - 12/20/2000 58.56 -none 7.0240.2 CONTE, JR., ROGER & SHARON 65.04 31.86 33.18 - - 11/27!2000 17.12 - 7.0994.1 CONTE, ROGER 71.52 41.53 29.99 - - 11/27/2000 38.76 -none 69.2252.1 COOK, PETER 95.42 61.74 33.68 - - 12/07/2000 135.10 -none 5.0518.1 COOK, ROBERT 82.08 46.81 35.27 - - 12/19/2000 66.02 -none 22.1598.1 COOPER, DEBBRA K 80.71 44.21 36.50 - - 11/28/2000 38.96 -none 42.2992.1 COPE, TIMOTHY 83.12 42.98 30.07 10.07 - 12/20/2000 20.00 -none 50.2114.1 CORNELL, BRUCE & LEE 52.76 26.38 26.38 - 11/24/2000 26.38 -none "• in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ,-~~. -~. Delinquent Account List-council Page: 5 CITY OF MERIDIAN Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:49pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Balance Non -Delinq 11/30/2000 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg Gust No Name 29 93 55.56 37.73 - - 12/19/2000 36.50 -none 2.1180.1 CORNISH, LAURA . - 12/21/2000 30.00 -none 31.3420.1 COUCH, JULIA 72.33 39.15 33.18 - - 11121/2000 173.07 - 22.0960.2 CRANER, DON 93.15 44.21 48.94 - - 12/20/2000 50.23 -none 1.2820.1 CRIDLAND, DONALD 119.66 73.12 46.54 - - 11/27/2000 57.33 -none 22.1044.1 GRIST, SHEILA 86.56 40.30 46.26 - - 01/02/2001 37.37 -none 42.4070.1 CROSS, ARBY 65.23 36.47 28.76 - - 11/30/2000 68.78 -none 74.2336.1 CROWELL, GARY 81.91 44.04 37.87 - - 11/27/2000 136.10 -none 74.2834.1 CROWLEY, BILLY 121.54 67.06 54.48 - - 12/21 /2000 68.04 -none 5.0154.1 CROY, CLAUDE 71.65 40.91 30.74 - - 12/26/2000 43.76 -none 51.0998.1 CULVER, WALTER 109.65 68.51 41.14 - - 11 /28/2000 31.36 - 31.3646.2 GUSHING, BARRY 75.35 42.76 32.59 - 11/22/2000 44.08 - 74.2692.2 CUSHMAN, KELLY 89.53 47.91 41.62 - - 11 /22/2000 68.62 - 21.2922.2 CUTLER, JASON & KIMBERLY 93.29 50.50 42.79 _ 12/14/2000 44.97 -none 50.3734.1 CZARNECKI, CHERYL 65.48 34.04 31.44 - - 12/18/2000 45.00 - 4.0686.2 DA ROSA, JULIE 86.58 51.87 34.71 - - 12/20/2000 40.25 -none 74.3536.1 DAILY, ROBERT 78.04 40.25 37.79 - 39 11/21/2000 - 66.00- 50.0284.3 DALE, MARK 73.25 26.38 46.48 . - 11/17/2000 26.38 -none 50.4590.1 DAROSA, JOSEPH D 52.76 26.38 26.38 - 33 82 - 11 /27/2000 82.03 -none 22.1420.1 DAVENPORT, DUANE 107.94 41.53 32.59 . _ 12/21/2000 39.76 - 69.1290.1 DAVID OVARD 60.56 26.38 34.18 - - 12/01/2000 15.44- 40.0380.3 DAVIDSON, DOUGLAS & JANINE 80.99 46.81 34.18 _ 11/22/2000 26.38 -none 22.2226.1 DAVIS, STEVEN 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/15/2000 75.06 -none 2.6660.1 DAVIS, SUSAN 61.70 32.86 28.84 - - 11/22/2000 51.69 -none 33.0282.1 DAY, ETHEL 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 12/20/2000 56.00 -none 21.3070.1 DECK, KIMBERLY 91.71 48.04 43.67 - - 11/28/2000 27.61 - 50.0742.2 DECKER, GORDON 78.20 49.36 28.84 - _ 12/22/2000 33.07 - 32.0902.3 DEEL, RICHARD 117.08 75.52 41.56 - - 11/17/2000 26.38 -none 31.3586.1 DEITRICK, VIVIAN 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 12/04/2000 60.00 -none 72.0132.1 DEL BRADLEY STINE 127 90 77.06 50.84 - _ 11/20/2000 91.05 -none 1.0930.1 DENNEN, JERON & HEATHER 70.59 41.75 28.84 _ 11/22/2000 - 89.12 -none 34.2762.1 DENNEY, ROBERT 104.92 59.53 45.39 - - 12/20/2000 52.59 -none 2.1610.1 DESILET, DENICE 81.94 44.21 37.73 - - 12/0412000 50.59 -none 69.0612.1 DEVANEY, JAMES & LYNDA 59.98 28.76 31.22 - 65 112 36 12/05/2000 45 27.34 - 46.4956.1 DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED 491.07 220.41 112.65 . . - 11/29/2000 122.36 -none 2.1960.1 DICKSON, DONALD M 87.00 50.50 36.50 - - 12/14/2000 35.41 - 35.1210.2 DILDINE, BRAD 84.48 49.27 35.21 - _ 50.1920.4 DILDINE, BRENT & TRICIA 66.77 32.59 34.18 - _ 50.2384.2 DIPZINSKI FOREST & ROSEMAR 50.31 26.38 23'93 12/20/2000 - 26.38 -none 69.0490.1 DIXON, SCOTT & HEATHER 52.76 26.38 26.38 - 87 47 36 09/21/2000 108 60.33 - 51.3930.3 DMK INVESTMENTS L.L.C. 216.79 26.38 34.18 . . - 11/22/2000 70.46 -none 22.2236.1 DOAN, DENNIS 85.47 45.36 40.11 - - 11/27/2000 112.63 -none 3.0700.1 DOBARAN, JOHN & ARVELLA 281.64 161.35 120.29 - 12/22/2000 58.78 -none 34.1690.1 DOCKWEILER, THOMAS & TERR 82.08 44.21 37'87 _ 11/29/2000 145.00 -none 4.1554.1 DOLL, THOMAS 116.91 68.16 48.75 - 11/28/2000 50.00 - 33.2594.2 DONALDSON, NEAL 105.69 40.30 32.59 32.80 - - 11/28/2000 569.02 -none 51.4320.1 DOUBLE-D SERVICE CENTER 394.32 283.56 110.76 _ 11/16/2000 51.04 -none 21.3282.1 DOWDLE, KEVIN 77.95 42.90 35.05 - - 11/22!2000 50.26 -none 31.3652.1 DOWNER-MANVILLE,MARVELYP 74.74 31.86 42.88 _ 11/27/2000 44.02- 31.0826.3 DOWNIE, JASON D 83.31 44.21 39.10 - - 11/22/2000 57.61 -none 4.2172.1 DREWNIAK, GARY 95.73 50.42 45.31 - - 11/14/2000 301-.63- 20.1588.2 DREXLER, JOHN 76.74 34.09 42.65 - - 12/26/2000 71.00 -none 4.2282.1 DRURY, PATRICK 109.00 59.19 49.81 - 61 27 09 04/10/2000 192 23.25 - 51.0698.2 DUEROCK, WALTER 272.46 26.38 26.38 . . - 11/28/2000 102.96 -none 2.6970.1 DULHANTY, TAMARA 84.54 45.44 39.10 - - 11!3012000 32.65 -none 34.0398.1 DUNCAN, RICHARD 84.54 48.04 36.50 - *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent -.~ CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 6 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:49pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt CustNo Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 3.0408.1 DUNNAM, GLEN 92.20 40.38 51.82 - - 11/16/2000 60.43 -none 34.2802.1 DUNSTAN, BRETT & MICHELLE 106.94 69.29 37.65 - - 11/24/2000 91.37 -none 3.0014.1 DUNSWORTH, BRAD 67.91 35.24 32.67 - - 11/15!2000 40.00 -none 4.1958.1 DUPLEX, HARRY 197.51 60.54 58.03 78.94 - 11/20/2000 115.38 -none 34.0886.1 DUREN, ALLEN & KELLEY 104.92 61.85 43.07 - - 11/22/2000 77.51 -none 65.0310.1 DUTHIE, JAMES 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/28/2000 26.38 -none 34.0746.2 DUVALL, KENNETH 110.40 68.28 42.12 - - 12/20/2000 52.00 - 74.3330.3 DUVALL, KENNETH 90.50 50.25 40.25 - - 12/20/2000 38.79 - 21.1160.1 EASTMAN, SCOTT 85.61 41.53 44.08 - - 12/01/2000 51.46 -none 50.4602.1 EBORN, RICHARD 99.25 54.08 45.17 - - 11 /29/2000 88.12 -none 48.1633.1 EDDY'S BAKERY 898.34 - - 36.00 862.34 - 74.3678.2 EDWARDS, DEARL W 65.32 28.76 36.56 - - 11/28/2000 27.00 - 21.0142.1 EDWARDS, MATHEW 70.29 37.70 32.59 - - 11/17/2000 31.36 -none 22.1502.2 EDWARDS, ROBERT 200.91 111.38 89.53 - - 12/04/2000 77.23 - 22.1490.1 EDWARDS, STAN 106.80 78.04 28.76 - - 11/22/2000 66.21 -none 31.2238.2 EGUTA, ONESIMO 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - 11/22/2000 27.57 - 72.0101.1 ELK RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSO( 757.12 - 24.60 341.10 391.42 09/19/2000 146.08 -none 68.0138.1 ELLINGTON, BRUCE 65.18 32.59 32.59 - - 12/20/2000 27.82 -none 34.0592.1 ELLIS, TODD & DANA 238.04 115.07 67.56 55.41 - 11/29/2000 80.00 -none 69.0524.1 ELORDI, PAT & BEKKI 120.17 59.40 60.77 - - 11/27/2000 152.37 -none 15.0039.1 EMERALD HOMES 100.15 - - - 100.15 04/24/2000 2.68 - 15.0067.1 EMERALD HOMES 102.21 - - - 102.21 04/24/2000 6.48 - 15.0005.1 EMERALD HOMES 86.35 - - - 86.35 04/24/2000 24.99 - 2.0180.1 ENGLISH, RONDA 113.22 - - - 113.22 10/18/1999 32.69 -none 74.2686.1 EPPERSON, DAREN 56.99 28.76 28.23 - - 11/30/2000 65.00 -none 50.1238.1 ERHART, MILT 93.38 53.19 40.19 - - 12/01/2000 89.15 -none 50.1240.2 ERHART, MILTON 122.80 49.36 37.87 35.57 - 11/28/2000 36.64 - 31.0436.2 EVANS, KIM 137.28 75.94 61.34 - - 12/20/2000 65.00 - 22.1758.2 EVANS, MARTIN 82.22 39.15 43.07 - - 11/30/2000 40.61 - 32.1554.1 EVANS, PHIL 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/22/2000 26.38 -none 15.0054.2 EVEY, RYAN 64.00 35.24 28.76 - - 11/22/2000 28.76 - 21.1750.1 FALETTI, ROY 109.68 61.77 47.91 - - 11/27/2000 52.15 -none 51.1294.1 FAMCO 584.38 328.34 256.04 - - 01 /02/2001 263.23 - 51.1295.1 FAMCO 34.02 - 34.02 - - 01/02/2001 42.12 - 46.4996.2 FAMOUSFOOTWEAR 466.94 147.12 294.60 25.22 - 12/01/2000 13.75- 32.1156.1 FARBER, BRIAN & KIMBER 93.57 51.87 41.70 - - 12/05/2000 57.69 -none 31.0156.2 FARNWORTH, WARREN 69.24 42.86 26.38 - - 11/29/2000 52.92- 1.3670.1 FARRAND, SHELLIE 78.27 42.86 35.41 - - 11/29/2000 84.51 -none 1.3660.1 FARRAND, SHELLIE 69.24 42.86 26.38 - - 11/29/2000 57.84 -none 33.3678.1 FAYLOR, MILFORD 130.07 53.10 39.10 37.87 - 01/04/2001 36.80 -none 31.3614.1 FICKES, MAURICE 212.18 47.04 39.19 125.95 - 11/27/2000 67.80 -none 21.0589.1 FIELDSTONE HOMEOWNERS A~ 85.86 - 85.86 - - 12/05/2000 204.12 -none 46.0212.1 FINLAYSON, CRAIG 83.88 46.59 37.29 - - 11/15/2000 54.00 -none 21.1990.1 FISCHER, ROSALIE 64.00 35.24 28.76 - - 11/24/2000 28.76 -none 74.1056.1 FISHER, BEA J. 52.76 26.38 26.38 - - 12/20/2000 25.46 -none 74.2910.1 FISHER, CHRIS & KAMMY 95.98 53.27 42.71 - - 12/01!2000 36.56 -none 51.3990.1 .FISHER, DANNY W 49.14 26.38 22.76 - - 12/07/2000 30.00 -none 22.1614.1 FISHER, DONALD H 163.59 51.78 61.84 28.76 21.21 10/16/2000 50.00 -none 32.0568.1 FISHER, MELVIN 74.78 32.86 41.92 - - 11/29/2000 56.00 -none 3.0054.1 FISHER, RICK 75.63 35.24 40.39 - - 11/17/2000 39.16 -none 2.0740.1 FISK, PATRICK 135.21 87.15 48.06 - - 12/20/2000 44.00 -none 72.0274.1 FITZGERALD, JUANITA 101.06 47.87 53.19 - - 11/30/2000 90.25 -none 5.0800.1 FITZSIMMONS, TOM 79.48 44.35 35.13 - - 12/20/2000 48.66 -none 1.1160.1 PLATEN, DONALD J. 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/27/2000 55.38 -none 51.4210.2 FLATTEN, ROBERT 131.53 57.02 40.33 34.18 - 11/29/2000 42.22- "' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List-council Page: 7 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:49pm Current Period: 01!31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 34.2084.1 FLORCZY III, ALEXANDER S. 103.69 59.39 44.30 - - 11/24/2000 92.81 -none 34.0860.1 FLYNN, BENJAMIN J 102.35 32.86 26.38 43.11 - 12/04/2000 75.00 -none 21.1776.1 FOREMAN, EARL 140.38 59.05 36.28 45.05 - 12/01/2000 43.74 -none 69.0738.1 PORGY, MICHAEL 96.17 51.74 44.43 - - 12/14/2000 60.00 -none 35.5049.2 FOSTER, TRACEY & LESLIE 122.56 84.69 37.87 - - 11/24/2000 14.33 - 34.1288.1 FOURNIER, JAMES 97.40 55.70 41.70 - - 12/12/2000 25.09 -none 22.1618.1 POWERS, JOHN 121.01 66.75 54.26 - - 12/01/2000 64.10 -none 51.3114.1 FOX, JAUNITY 46.52 23.26 23.26 - - 11/16/2000 23.26 -none 21.2924.1 FRAME, JONATHON 77.97 37.92 40.05 - - 12/07/2000 74.49 -none 74.3626.1 FRANCIS JR, DAVID 57.52 28.76 28.76 - - 12/20/2000 28.76 -none 2.5840.1 FRANK, GARY 166.02 69.39 51.82 44.81 - 11/29/2000 100.00 -none 74.0350.1 FRANK, GARY E 93.66 49.36 44.30 - - 12/04/2000 40.61 -none 0290.2 FREEMAN, CRAIG 68 76.67 36.42 .40.25 - - 12/14/2000 39.02 - . 2410.1 FREEMAN, JOHNNA 33 61.94 32.86 26.38 2.70 - 11/06/2000 45.00 -none . 3078.3 FREEMAN, NICOLE 51 60.61 27.09 33.52 - - 11/22/2000 61.70 - . 31.3050.1 FRENCH, DEBRA 100.68 46.69 27.61 26.38 - 11/29/2000 31.46 -none 50.3754.1 FRENCH, LAWRENCE 205.47 30.21 28.84 43.60 102.82 11/22/2000 150.00 -none 2828.1 FRIEND, RICHARD 21 69.06 36.47 32.59 - - 11/27/2000 33.82 -none . 4258.1 FROSTROM, STEVE & TERRI 33 180.96 121.48 59.48 - - 11 /22/2000 116.82 -none . 0342.1 FRY, JOHN & SHERRIE 22 113.37 57.94 55.43 - - 11/22/2000 131.85 -none . 1176.1 FRY, LARRY 34 107.38 68.42 38.96 - - 11/27/2000 124.82 -none . 5.0242.2 FULLER,MITCH 100.79 51.65 49.14 - - 11/15/2000 143.87- 21.1014.1 FUNK, DAVID 85.47 41.53 43.94 - - 11/24/2000 71.00 -none 0676.1 GAINOR, THOMAS & DIA 32 196.71 54.33 44.16 39.24 58.98 01/02/2001 50.00 -none . 21.0496.1 GALE, JANICE 65.23 36.47 28.76 - - 11/28/2000 28.76 -none 31.2250.1 GARCIA, ANOTONIO 193.54 108.42 85.12 - - 11/29/2000 186.31 -none 1138.2 GARDNER, BRENDON 42 98.07 56.59 41.48 - - 12/21!2000 40.25 - . 22.0476.1 GARDNER, LAWRENCE 99.70 46.59 53.11 - - 11/27/2000 .141.53-none 1284.2 GARDNER, VINCE 20 126.23 66.83 59.40 - - 11/27/2000 63.09 - . 1198.1 GARDOSKI, WILLIAM 50 82.83 26.38 26.38 30.07 - 11/24/2000 37.61 -none . 0390.1 GARDUNO, DENNIS 69 70.04 37.87 32.17 - - 12/20/2000 50.00 -none . 21.3048.2 GARLICK, LEWIS 221.14 117.57 103.57 - - 12/04/2000 365.40 - 0188.2 GATES, JOHN 46 87.02 50.38 36.64 - - 11/29/2000 72.21 - . 20.1490.1 GATES, LARRY 101.23 56.93 44.30 - - 11/17/2000 43.07 -none 0450.4 GATES, TERESA 1 77.16 42.98 34.18 - - - . 0780.1 GAVIN, THEODORE 34 102.60 55.70 46.90 - - 11/15/2000 139.47 -none . 0950.1 GAYTHIWAITE, RITCHIE & SUSAI 2 77.02 37.92 39.10 - - 12/20/2000 53.86 -none . 4000.1 GERRY BURKE 13 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - 11/28/2000 35.41 - . 2480.1 GILBERT, CARL 2 127.76 68.28 59.48 - - 12/19/2000 61.94 -none . 0394.1 GILBERTSON, KEVIN 34 95.75 48.04 37.87 9.84 - 12/19/2000 37.87 -none . 0576.1 GILLENWATER, RICHARD 46 96.03 54.33 41.70 - - 12/01/2000 40.47 -none . 0366.1 GILLUM, DERICK & AMY 42 88.07 46.59 41.48 - - 11/20/2000 43.94 -none . 2216.1 GLENCOE, MATTHEW 50 66.41 32.59 33.82 - - 12/01/2000 32.59 -none . 4318.1 GLENN JOHNSON 14 61.92 32.86 28.64 .42 - 11/20/2000 6.06 - . 35.1156.1 GLENN JOHNSON 101.22 32.86 34.18 34.18 - 10/24/2000 81.71 - 1 GLENN JOHNSON 0112 35 100.32 32.86 34.18 33.28 - 10!24/2000 12.96 - . . 35:0119.1 GLENN JOHNSON 101.22 32.86 34.18 34.18 - 10/24/2000 32.17 - 35.1024.1 GLENN JOHNSON 101.22 32.86 34.18 34.18 - 10/24(2000 80.89 - 0013.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 15 56.77 30.29 6.48 20.00 - - . 0256.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 35 67.98 32.86 28.64 6.48 - 10/24/2000 6.48 - . 0139.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 35 107.18 51.87 30.07 25.24 - 10/24/2000 26.51 - . 1018.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 35 101.22 32.86 34.18 34.18 - 10/24/2000 34.28 - . 4.2160.2 GLUMM, DENNIS 128.43 60:76 67.67 - - 12/19/2000 214.38 - 2106.2 GOEHRING, DAVID C 21 68.27 32.86 35.41 - - 11/22/2000 66:06 - . 32.1528.1 GOINS, RICHARD 61.74 32.86 28.88 - - 12/20/2000 60.00 -none `"' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 8 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:49pm Current Period: 01/3112001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 3.0344.1 GOODNER, L DEAN & REBECCA 119.99 70.54 47.77 1.68 - 11/29/2000 87.09 -none 50.2082.1 GORDON, MIKE & MARSHA 52.76 26.38 26.38 - - 11/14/2000 50.46 -none 42.2588.1 GORDON, THOMAS 121.31 61.77 59.54 - - 11/24/2000 72.00 -none 34.1240.1 GORE, JOSEPH 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 12/01/2000 26.38 -none 21.2790.1 GORRINGE, BENNY 112.14 71.77 40.37 - - 11/29/2000 103.44 -none 74.2574.2 GOBLIN, CRAIG 147.68 41.70 39.38 66.60 - 11/28/2000 67.83 - 31.3374.1 GOULDING, PAULINE 83.31 46.67 36.64 - - 11/27/2000 34.18 -none 21.0996.1 GOURLEY, DAVID 74.40 36.61 37.79 - - 12/13/2000 80.96 -none 34.2846.1 GOWEY, MICHAEL 58.99 32.86 26.13 - - 12/19/2000 50.00 -none 50.3908.1 GRAHAM, JOHN & KATHLEEN 57.82 26.38 31.44 - - 11/22/2000 33.90 -none 33.0102.1 GRAND AUTO 224.52 115.50 109.02 - - 12/05/2000 2.49 -none 33.0101.1 GRAND AUTO 30.78 - 30.78 - - 12/05/2000 126.36 -none 14.5004.1 GRANDVIEW HOMES 56.28 29.90 26.38 - - 12/27/2000 26.38 - 32.1368.1 GRATTON, THOMAS 83.17 53.10 30.07 - - 11/27/2000 125.49 -none 34.3206.1 GRAYSON, DIANA 179.27 76.08 55.90 47.29 - 10/24/2000 51.14 -none 4.2352.1 GREAT CLIPS 114.24 46.72 33.76 33.76 - 11/03/2000 33.76 -none 2.3250.2 GREEN, JAY 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - - 4.1206.1 GREEN, KEVIN 81.95 39.07 31.36 11.52 - 10/25/2000 35.00 -none 1702.1 GREMMINGER, WAYNE 4 66.62 32.86 33.76 - - 11/16/2000 42.37 -none . 50.1486.2 GRIEP,RONALD 189.67 77.60 112.07 - - 11/17/2000 44.28- 34.2126.1 GRIGG, DANA K 61.84 32.86 28.98 - - 11/27!2000 90.74 -none 50.2412.3 GRISHAM, DANIEL & JANET 69.45 34.04 35.41 - - - 0318.1 GROSS, JOHN 19 88.35 45.36 42.99 - - 12/07/2000 44.22 -none . 69.0206.3 GROVES, CRAIG 71.91 34.04 37.87 - - 12/05/2000 35.41 - 74.2554.1 GROW, SHANNON 78.99 36.42 42.57 - - 12!01/2000 47.49 -none 2718.1 GUNTER, STEVEN & KRISTA 21 74.12 39.07 35.05 - - 11/20/2000 44.89 -none . 2378.1 GUTHMILLER, BRIAN A 50 180.79 41.70 68.93 70.16 - 11/27/2000 67.36 -none . 42.2070.3 HADLEY, BRENT 83.31 45.44 37.87 - - 12/21/2000 52.63 - 42.2138.2 HADLEY, STEPHANIE 151.92 83.38 68.54 - - 12/22/2000 41.17 - 2250.1 HADLEY, TRUDIE 2 78.13 49.15 28.98 - -, 12/07/2000 81.49 -none . 22.0456.1 HAHN, THOMAS & SHARI 76.58 45.36 31.22 - - 11/20/2000 75.80 -none 2144.1 HALDEN, DARYL 4 88.60 35.24 53.36 - - 12/21/2000 120.04 -none . 2080.1 HALE DEVELOPMENT 22 68.02 32.86 26.38 8.78 - 11/20/2000 24.08 - . 1594.1 HALL, BRIAN 4 163.61 61.87 101.74 - - 12/20/2000 90.00 -none . 2338.1 HAMILTON, TRACEY 33 258.60 75.94 54.42 54.42 73.82 11/14/2000 85.00 -none . 3732.1 HANDLEY, JEREMY 42 85.27 44.21 41.06 - - 12/20/2000 50.00 -none . 21.2074.2 HANFT, ROBERT 88.81 53.10 35.71 - - 12/21/2000 40.00 - 74.2662.1 HANSEN, DAVID 79.57 41.70 37.87 - - 12/22/2000 71.24 -none 4274.1 HANSEN, ERIK 33 93.10 53.10 40.00 - - 12/27/2000 67.83 -none . 22.1240.1 HANSON, JOHN & DIANA 83.96 41.53 42.43 - - 12/04/2000 60.89 -none 0906.1 HARMON, ROBERT K. & R HALL 2 71.20 42.98 28.22 - - 11/20/2000 56.00 -none . 2356.1 HARP, GREGORY 42 168.08 89.67 78.41 - - 12/22/2000 99.32 -none . 0084.1 HARPER, TERRY L. 74 94.53 28.76 65.77 - - 12/27!2000 40.00 -none . 1820.1 HARRINGTON-BLACK, JODY 42 67.83 35.24 32.59 - - 11/27/2000 59.54 -none . 34.0834.1 HARRIS, DERREK G 133.24 82.51 50.73 - - 11/28/2000 47.04 -none 0378.1 HARRY'S BAR & GRILL 51 563.37 249.13 .314.24 - - 12/04/2000 233.81 -none . 5.0506.1 HART, RANDY 181.33 100.07 81.26 - - 11/27/2000 231.48 -none 3528.1 HART, SHAWN 74 197.79 28.76 36.56 36.56 95.91 12/04/2000 20.00 -none . 0288.1 HARTW ELL, MARK 42 80.27 40.30 39.97 - - 12/12/2000 38.74 -none . 31.3036.1 RABBIS, BENJAMIN & PAM 103.80 59.39 44.16 .25 - 11/27/2000 87.00 -none 1026.2 HATCH, DAVID 21 92.72 41.61 37.87 13.24 - - . 20.1488.1 HATCH, ORSON 86.05 49.41 36.64 - - 11/27/2000 37.21 -none 69.1318.1 HAUN, CORY 81.73 44.08 37.65 - - 11 /24/2000 51.18 -none 40.0050.1 HAUSHEER, JAMES & CAROL 88.08 32.86 26.38 28.84 - 10/12/2000 26.54 -none 1.1850.2 HAWKINS, RUSSELL 220.58 120.16 100.42 - - - '•• in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ~ Delinquent Account List- council Page: 9 CITY OF MERIDIAN 2001 03:49pm Jan 16 Standard Payment Customers , Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10131/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 1 HAYES, LOREN 0480 21 74.12 41.53 32.59 - - 11/27/2000 62.80 -none . . 1 HAYLETT, MIKE 1212 4 64.00 35.24 28.76 - - 11/24/2000 55.14 -none . . 1 HEARTLAND MERIDIAN COMM. 0116 33 114.26 66.60 47.66 - - 11/22/2000 51.51 -none . . 1 HEATON CONSTRUCTION 1308 20 138.87 42.86 34.18 34.18 27.65 09/14/2000 6.48 - . . 1 HEATON CONSTRUCTION 4058 64 94.64 58.16 34.18 2.30 - 12/22/2000 31.88 - . . 1 HEATON, JUDITH A. 1624 20 66.90 32.86 34.04 - - 11/21/2000 167.87 -none . . 1 HEIBERG, JAMES & CHERYL 0782 69 108.68 55.57 53.11 - - 11/22/2000 65.41 -none . . BRIAN 1 HEIN 0946 2 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/20/2000 27.61 -none , . . 1 HELZER, JANET 3494 31 75.65 48.04 27.61 - - 12/22/2000 30.07 -none . . 1 HENRY, BRAD 1542 34 109.25 42.98 34.04 32.23 - 11/24/2000 25.00 -none . . 1 HENSEN, JAMES & RENA 6830 2 113.51 68.34 45.17 - - 11/28/2000 73.46 -none . . 0536.1 HEPLER, BENJAMIN & JUDY 69 92.80 44.08 46.26 2.46 - 12/20/2000 46.26 -none . 1 HERKSHAN, ENOS & VERONICA 0150 1 84.46 42.98 41.48 - - 12/07/2000 46.00 -none . . 0047.2 HERSLEY, SCOTT 35 70.99 40.52 30.47 - - 11/22/2000 45.00 - . 1 NESTER, LLYOD & SHERRY 0384 74 87.43 26.38 31.58 29.47 - 12/01/2000 60.00 -none . . 1 HETTENBACH, KENNETH 0754 69 57.52 28.76 28.76 - - 11/27/2000 85.89 -none . . 1 HEUGHINS, RUSSELL S. 0248 31 124.89 50.38 39.10 35.41 - 11/29/2000 46.80 -none . . 1 HEWITT, ROLLIE & DIANNA 1738 32 61.70 32.86 28.84 - - 11/15/2000 3622 -none . . 1 HIGGINBOTHAM, RON 3580 51 108.11 74.07 34.04 - - 11/28/2000 37.73 -none . . RONIE & CARLA 2 HILL 1870 34 155.57 59.31 41.48 54.78 - 11/20/2000 75.00 - , . . 1 HILL, W THOMAS 0126 3 116.78 74.49 42.29 - - 11 /24/2000 45.98 -none . . 1 HILLER, BRENT 3970 42 65.53 36.69 28.84 - - 11/21/2000 26.38 -none . . 1 HILLMAN, ALLEN 3280 21 85.47 51.79 33.68 - - 12/11/2000 47.21 -none . . 1 HITESMAN, DOLPH & EILEEN 0320 22 125.95 65.46 60.49 - - 12/04/2000 59.26 -none . . 1 HODOR, LARRY 3710 50 106.26 51.70 54.56 - - 12/11/2000 171.10 -none . . 1 HOFFMAN, DELORES & WILLIAM 2066 4 205.15 137.00 68.15 - - 12/04/2000 82.91 -none . . 1 HOFFMAN, JON C 0920 1 89.74 49.27 40.47 - - 11/27/2000 47.24 -none . . 1 HOLLENBECK, KEITH 1270 20 62.72 28.76 33.96 - - 01/04/2001 35.19 -none . . 1 HOLLEY, DAVID 5 0722 116.08 93.50 22.58 - - 01/10/2001 103.44 -none . . 1 HOLLINGSHEAD, BRETT 1456 32 87.00 53.10 33.90 - - 12/20/2000 45.03 -none . . 1 HOLLOWAY, RON & PAIGE 4346 33 63.22 32.86 30.36 - - 12/22/2000 80.00 -none . . JAMES & CRYSTAL 1 HOOK 0536 21 105.12 52.88 45.31 6.93 - 01/10/2001 35.00 -none , . . 1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 1198 74 248.08 132.63 115.45 - - 11/27/2000 140.71 -none . . 1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 1158 74 169.05 94.33 74.72 - - 11/27/2000 103.59 -none . . 1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 1202 74 132.38 67.52 64.86 - - 11/27/2000 80.52 -none . . 1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 1146 74 1,858.02 704.77 704.77 448.48 - 12/05/2000 72.72 -none . . 1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 1206 74 124.64 67.52 57.12 - - 11/27/2000 77.92 -none . . 1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 1190 74 132.78 90.50 42.28 - - 11/27/2000 213.08 -none . . 1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 1222 74 381.29 167.10 214.19 - - 11/27/2000 288.45 -none . . 1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 1154 74 142.22 82.84 59.38 - - 11!27!2000 67.52 -none . . 1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 1162 74 148.87 67.52 81.35 - - 11!27/2000 125.68 -none . . 1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 1150 74 124.52 67.52 57.00 - - 11/27/2000 67.52 -none . . 1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 1186 74 287.80 67.52 147.47 72.81 - 12/05!2000 77.92 -none . . 3 HOPKINS FARM LLC 1066 52 413.69 174.29 239.40 - - 12/22/2000 72.23 - . . 2 HOPKINS FARM LLC 1065 52 40.50 - 40.50 - - 10!25/2000 302.94 - . . 1 HOSAC, JAMES 3966 74 85.44 50.25 35.19 - - 11/29/2000 71.69 -none . . SHARON 1 HOUSE 2644 74 61.21 28.76 32.45 - - 12/01/2000 36.14 -none , . . 1 HOUSTON, RICHARD 3316 74 66.85 34.04 32.81 - - 11/20/2000 35.27 -none . . 1 HOWARD, FRANK 1722 22 83.28 27.76 27.76 27.76 - 10/16/2000 25.18 -none . . JOEL 1 HOWARD 0256 5 98.63 53.10 45.53 - - 11/24/2000 56.60 -none , . . 1 HOWELL TRACT HOMEOWNER: 3337 34 719.28 - 77.76 641.52 - 11/02/2000 986.58 -none . . 1 HOW ELL, CHAD 0216 22 94.21 50.42 43.79 - - 12/05/2000 65.95 -none . . 3 HOWELL,GAYLEEN 0470 1 72.10 37.92 34.18 - - 12/19/2000 34.18- . . 1 HOW ELL, JAMES 0226 50 182.51 97.23 85.28 - - 11/30/2000 182.59 -none . . 33.2652.1 HOWELL, KATHLEEN 129.79 51.87 36.50 41.42 11/28/2000 46.50 -none ••' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Delinquent Account List- council Page: 10 CITY OF MERIDIAN Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:49pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name, Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 1 HOYT DEVELOPMENT 0071 15 120.87 27.70 34.18 34.18 24.81 - . . 1 HOYT DEVELOPMENT 0068 15 127.94 27.70 34.18 34.18 31.88 09/12/2000 17.26 - . . 18 102 63 22 38.96 - - 12/13/2000 46.34 -none 31.3072.1 HULSIZER, KEN . . - 12/11/2000 90.00 -none 51.0714.1 HUMPHREYS, JOHN M. 89.88 56.30 33.58 - 12/18/2000 35.17 -none KAREN 1 HUNEMILLER 0838 3 62.45 34.09 26.38 1.98 - , . . 2 HUNEMILLER, KELLY 1166 19 71.80 35.24 36.56 - - 12/18/2000 35.87 - . . KIM 1 HUNEMILLER 0814 3 65.23 35.24 29.99 - - 12/11/2000 28.76 -none , . . 54 82 28.76 53.78 - - 12/20/2000 62.39 - 69.1266.2 HUNT, CARL . - 10/04/2000 80.00 -none 34.2100.1 HUNT, RADELL 80.35 45.58 34.77 - 11/24/2000 30.00- 51.0510.3 HUNT, WESLEY 81.44 34.04 34.18 13.22 - - 11/20/2000 49.56 -none 69.0220.1 HUNTER, JAMES 78.32 28.76 49.56 - 11/30/2000 108.00- 3 HUTCHINSON,DAVE 1946 34 143.90 106.18 37.45 .27 - . . 87 128 15 39 31.44 31.44 26.84 01/08/2001 30.21 -none 21.0470.1 HYVONEN, CLARK . . - 12/22/2000 16.88 -none 1 IDAHO DEPT. OF LAW ENFORCE 0944 52 294.65 138.53 156.12 - . . 49 98 68 16 30.33 - - 11/29/2000 95.74 -none 33.2754.1 INGOE, BRADLEY . . - 01/11/2001 48.00 -none 42.2592.1 ISHIYAMA, IAN W. 82.54 60.54 22.00 - 12/19/2000 34.18 - 1 IVERSON CONSTRUCTION INC 2430 43 77.61 32.86 34.18 10.57 - . . 3 J KELLER & E CLAYTON 0690 69 71.01 36.42 34.59 - - 11/16/2000 35.00 - . . 1 JABIL CIRCUIT 0750 52 1,361.91 652.23 709.68 - - 12/04/2000 575.63 - . . 58 32 - 58.32 - - 11/20/2000 153.90 -none 50.1221.1 JACK IN THE BOX #6010 . - 12/20/2000 30.00 -none 2.5820.1 JACKSON, ROBERT 72.15 48.18 23.97 - - 11 /30/2000 54.15 -none 65.3112.1 JACOBS, MARIE 63.99 36.38 27.61 - - 11/30/2000 64.00 -none 68.0046.1 JACOBSEN, JASON & LIANNA 69.94 36.76 31.18 - 16 - 58 1 JAMES A KISSLERIOAKBROOK 0700 42 391.15 68.37 322.78 - - 12/01/2000 . . . 66 71 07 39 32.59 - - 11/29/2000 79.37 -none 21.1712.1 JAMES, MELANIE . . - - 11/22/2000 41.62 -none 69.1564.1 JARDINE, FRANK 88.16 44.08 44.08 . 1.1464.2 JELLIFFE, MARIA 315.24 131.44 105.52 78.28 - - 06 - 66 LEROY 2 JENKINS 1630 19 77.04 42.86 34.18 - - 11!29/2000 . , . . 96 57 38 26 31.58 - - 11/22/2000 45.11 -none 69.2284.1 JEW ELL, RICHARD . . - 11/22/2000 49.53- 34.0015.1 JOHN WARDLE 74.52 - 74.52 - - 11/27/2000 126.09 - 34.0390.2 JOHNSON, PETER 107.22 65.74 41.48 - - 11/28/2000 37.87- 35.0004.2 JOHNSON, RANDY 83.45 46.81 36.64 - - 11 /17/2000 84.22 - 20.1554.2 :IOHNSTON, JAMES 162.76 88.38 74.38 - - 12/04/2000 100.74 -none 51.4290.1 JONES, BRET 212.97 112.23 100.74 - - 12/20/2000 92.16 -none 22.0330.1 JONES, ELDON & LORI 148.79 71.89 76.90 - - 12/13/2000 34.18 -none 50.2354.1 JONES, LARA 69.45 34.04 35.41 - - 11/27/2000 41.42 -none 32.1674.1 JONES, M JAY 74.56 40.52 34.04 - - 12/14/2000 41.62 -none 74.2932.1 JORDAN, MITCHELL 85.70 44.08 41.62 - - 12/12/2000 26.38 -none 50.2002.1 JORDAN, STEVEN 52.76 26.38 26.38 - - 11 /24/2000 63.03 -none 31.0844.1 JORGENSEN, BRADLEY 127.62 69.51 58.11 - - 12/20/2000 74.97 -none 20.0112.1 JUDY, JEAN 90.81 42.90 47.91 - - 12/19/2000 70.00 -none 34.0812.1 KAUTZ, KARL & LORRAINE 88.80 42.98 45.82 - - 09/06/2000 204.73 -none 21.0028.1 KEENEY, DOLAN 188.35 126.32 62.03 - - 11/24/2000 33.76 -none 50.3706.1 KELLER, DOUG 55.22 26.38 28.84 - 38 26 23 12/14/2000 10 20.00 -none 1.0870.1 KELLOGG, J.R. 146.04 83.05 26.38 . . - 12/20/2000 131.22-none 21.2709.1 KENTFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASS 71.28 - 71.28 - - 12/01 /2000 27.00 - 7.0970.2 KERBER, DALLAS 63.76 37.92 25.84 - - 11/14/2000 67.13 -none 34.3212.1 KERBS, DAVID 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/20/2000 158.07 - 21.2906.2 KERR, BARBRA 85.61 44.13 41.48 - - 11 /28/2000 55.23 -none 22.0896.1 KEY, MIKE & PENNEY 115.99 68.14 47.85 - - 12/19/2000 58.00 -none 42.2530.1 KILER, KELLY & TAMMY 119.94 65.68 54.26 - 11/27/2000 112.12 -none 4.1614.1 KINCAID, GEORGE & LAURA 362.45 159.28 91.13 112.04 - 11/29/2000 69.57 -none 3.0298.1 KING, DAVID R 135.30 57.82 36.28 41.20 - - 11!28/2000 26.38 -none 50.2364.1 KING, KELLY R. 52.76 26.38 26.38 - - 11/28/2000 44.46 -none 74.3800.1 KING, KEVIN 99.95 53.19 46.76 - "' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 11 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:49pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 2.6520.1 KING, LOUIS J 38.07 - 6.48 31.59 - 10/06!2000 41.33 -none 21.2090.1 KINGSTON, CHRISTIE 80.55 40.30 40.25 - - 12/20/2000 41.48 -none 3.0024.1 KINNEY, KIMIKO 172.23 79.43 42.71 50.09 - 11/30/2000 50.34 -none 5.0342.1 KIRBY, GREGORY & KAREN 87.05 41.75 36.50 8.80 - 11!22/2000 50.00 -none 31.3268.1 KIRKLAND, LISA 113.53 66.91 46.62 - - 11/22/2000 44.16 -none 50.2116.1 KIRKMAN, T.R. & JAMIE 52.76 26.38 26.38 - - 11/28/2000 36.38 -none 72.0112.3 KIRSCHNER, KATIE 111.16 64.68 46.48 - - 12/04/2000 41.56 - 32.1180.1 KLEIN, REINER 90.97 51.87 39.10 - - 11/28/2000 64.93 -none 34.1058.1 KLEMETSON, MONTE 63.07 36.69 26.38 - - 11 /22/2000 25.15 -none 51.0466.1 KLINE, BEVERLY 48.86 28.76 20.10 - - 12/20/2000 50.00 -none 34.1196.1 KNAPP, MICHAEL & CATHERINE 75.65 42.98 32.67 - - 11/16/2000 30.21 -none 34.2128.1 KNIGHT, JON 174.53 104.93 69.60 - - 11/24/2000 183.64 -none 74.0342.3 KNOWLTON, KIMBERLY 71.69 46.42 25.27 - - 12/18/2000 50.00 - 19.4478.2 KOBER, JAMES 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/15/2000 26.38 - 21.2940.1 KOERNER, LAWRENCE 69.20 35.24 33.96 - - 12/14/2000 46.26 -none 21.0462.2 KORBER, GERALD 128.57 60.62 67.95 - - 12/12/2000 150.82 - 15.0009.2 KOUBA, VINCE 64.30 36.69 27.61 - - 11/17/2000 27.61 - 4.2262.1 KREEGAR, KRISTOPHER 100.26 45.36. 42.57 12.33 - 12/20/2000 45.00 -none 19.6642.1 KRENZ, ROY 74.12 40.30 33.82 - - 12/21/2000 72.80 -none 46.0368.2 KUPER, GREG 85.69 45.36 40.33 - - 11/30/2000 41.56 - 31.0498.1 KYLLO, DIANE M. 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/28/2000 30.07 -none 31.0628.1 KYSAR, ANITA 287.34 123.35 114.63 49.36 - 11/29/2000 66.74 -none 50.0712.1 LACASA LAVILLA 190.98 117.31 73.67 - - 11/22/2000 67.52 -none 74.0426.1 LACY, GLORIA 52.76 26.38 26.38 - - 11/29/2000 39.91 -none 50.1750.1 LACY, MEL 80.80 34.04 46.76 - - 12/22/2000 6.15 -none 69.0532.1 LAFEVER FAMILY TRUST 76.92 12.63 64.29 - - 12/20/2000 114.33 -none 50.1782.1 LAFEVER; RONALD 165.18 85.26 79.92 - - 11/27/2000 73.77 -none 19.0010.1 LAFLAN, RANDY 235.03 95.15 139.88 - - 11 /24/2000 71.00 -none 22.0338.1 LAMKEY, ALLEN 95.43 45.36 50.07 - - 12/11/2000 50.00 -none 42.2550.1 LAMON, PAUL A. 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 12/20/2000 55.90 -none 22.1244.2 LAMPKIS, LISA 84.40 37.92 46.48 - - 11!24/2000 40.33 - 51.0830.2 LANEYLANDL.P. 185.13 94.48 90.65 - - 11/21!2000 90.65- 4.1776.1 LANSING, BUD 115.85 69.31 46.54 - - 12/20/2000 86.96 -none 1.0890.1 LANTZ, STAN 69.36 41.75 27.61 - - 11/27/2000 62.76 -none 21.2052.1 CARSON, ARTHUR & ARLENE 76.72 40.30 36.42 - - 11!14/2000 35.19 -none 22.0336.1 CARSON, CART 67.83 35.24 32.59 - - 12/07/2000 36.28 -none 33.0108.1 CARSON, TIMOTHY 55.99 - - - 55.99 05/19/2000 25.00 -none 31.0866.1 CARSON-POOLE, VICKEE K. 90.72 50.50 40.22 - - 12/19/2000 42.00 -none 3.0272.2 LAUFENBERG, JAMES R 111.22 42.86 34.18 34.18 - 11/29/2000 40.11 - 32.0762.1 LAUFENBERG, JIM & TAMIE 137.18 61.85 75.33 - - 11/24/2000 66.72 -none 2.4990.1 LAUFENBERG, JIM & TAMMIE 265.11 74.71 43.60 73.28 73.52 12/18/2000 14.00 -none 51.0390.1 LAWSON, ROBERT 63.36 31.68 31.68 - - 01/02/2001 31.68 -none 46.0816.1 LEATHAM, JARED 92.08 54.21 37.87 - - 12!26/2000 39.10 -none 50.3818.1 LEE, JEROD 61.77 26.38 35.39 - - 12/20/2000 21.00 -none 22.1630.1 LEE, RAE 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/14/2000 30.07 -none 22.1728.2 LEHMAN, ROBERT 74.42 42.98 31.44 - - 11/22/2000 30.21 - 43.0370.2 LEMAR, RICK & MELISSA 145.14 48.04 45.25 39.10 12.75 - 42.2736.1 LENAGHEN, CHRIS 89.73 35.24 32.59 21.90 - 11/27/2000 40.00 -none 31.3354.1 LEONARDSON, ELIZABETH 95.62 42.86 26.38 26.38 - 11/29/2000 24.08 -none 42.2278.1 LEQUERICA, CINDY 113.25 66.71 46.54 - - 11/29/2000 132.52 -none 5.0362.1 LESEBERG, KAREN 111.60 48.04 63.56 - - 11/22/2000 88.16 -none 21.1480.2 LESTER, BETTE 103.53 50.42 53.11 - - 12/20/2000 74.02 - 34.2852.1 LEVELL, SUZANNE 157.12 42.86 27.61 86.65 - 11/30/2000 141.77 -none 31.3382.1 LEVITY, MONTE 120.26 56.59 33.68 29.99 - 11/30/2000 55.23 -none 22.0328.1 LEWIS, JEFFREY 98.32 45.36 44.08 8.88 - 12/28/2000 44.08 -none "' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 12 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:50pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10/3112000 09!30/2000 Date Amount Msg 72.0208.1 LEWIS, PHILLIP 78.87 42.59 36.28 - - 11/29/2000 103.39 -none 33.2278.1 LEWIS, RIK & CAROL 79.70 40.52 39.18 - - 11/14/2000 60.00 -none 34.1754.1 LIEBERMAN, DAVID 92.96 49.41 42.79 .76 - 01/02/2001 42.79 -none 50.2130.1 LIKES, JENNIFER 70.54 34.04 36.50 - - 11/27/2000 60.86 -none 47.0062.1 LITTLE, JOSEPH 71.66 35.24 36.42 - - 11/22/2000 33.96 -none 2.0458.1 LLOYD, JOHN & DEENA 70.73 39.15 31.58 - - 12/01/2000 60.86 -none 19.0962.1 LOBATO CONSTRUCTION 81.19 44.13 28.64 6.48 1.94 - 32.0602.1 LOLLEY, JUDITH 66.76 32.86 33.90 - - 11/27/2000 173.74 -none 4.1648.1 LONG, RAYME 116.19 73.40 42.79 - 12/11/2000 46.48 -none 4.1562.2 LONGSTREET, GARRET 82.10 46.69 35.41 - - 12/20/2000 47.71 - 50.2042.1 LONGSTREET, GARRET 60.42 30.21 30.21 - - 11/28/2000 28.98 -none 34.0814.1 LONGWORTH, ERIC 115.32 55.70 59.62 - - 11/13/2000 200.58 -none 2.4270.1 LORD, LARRY R. 64.30 36.69 27.61 - - 12/20/2000 43.76 -none 21.3134.1 LOVE, JAMES & ELIZABETH 106.96 50.64 56.32 - - 12/20/2000 104.29 -none 2.0464.1 LOVE, JEANETTE & JOHN 102.32 56.93 45.39 - - 11/22/2000 121.69 -none 19.7608.2 LOVELAND, DUANE E 65.04 31.86. 33.18 - - 11/06!2000 21.87 - 20.0132.1 LOVELAND, JAMES 103.55 63.22 40.33 - - 11!24/2000 124.95 - 32.1550.1 LOWE, CHRISTOPHER 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11!16/2000 26.38 -none 21.2636.1 LUCERO, ROBERT & TRACY 81.64 45.36 36.28 - - 12/22/2000 62.11 -none 74.2320.1 LUTZ, R. KELLY 89.53 44.08 45.45 - - 11/17/2000 93.44 -none 74.2896.2 LYONS, TYLER 77.76 40.25 37.51 - - 11/24/2000 35.05 - 74.3072.1 LYTLE, CHAD & STACEY 101.85 69.40 32.45 - - 11 /29/2000 66.21 -none 74.2840.1 MACHO, CRAIG & TAMMY 124.36 73.23 51.13 - - 12/19/2000 50.00 -none 42.1970.1 MACHULE, HERBERT 82.08 48.04 34.04 - - 11/16/2000 57.41 -none 5.0432.1 MACKINTOSH, MICHAEL 94.50 54.25 40.25 - - 11!27/2000 20.14 -none 31.2210.1 MAGDLIN, JOHN 70.59 37.92 32.67 - - 12/19/2000 31.44 -none 35.1004.2 MAHALISKO,MIKE 95.59 63.14 32.45 - - 11/22/2000 29.42- 34.1774.1 MAHONEY, MICHAEL 76.24 46.81 29.43 - - 11/22/2000 55.00 -none 74.3078.1 MANNING, SEAN & GINGER 60.12 28.76 31.36 - - 11/29/2000 31.36 -none 5.0268.1 MANOS, PETER 477.84 64.23 64.04 94.79 254.78 01/02/2001 57.22 -none 2.1510.1 MANWARING, MARK 78.25 32.86 45.39 - - 11!16/2000 97.09 -none 42.2332.1 MARIN, JOSE 120.75 66.97 53.78 - - 11/27/2000 67.65 -none 34.1472.1 MARKHAM, RON 84.42 52.98 31.44 - - 11/29/2000 59.18 -none 33.1850.1 MARSHALL, GARY & BOBETTE 91.90 54.25 37.65 - - 11/27/2000 72.92 -none 42.1950.1 MARTIN, DANIEL K. 75.35 41.53 33.82 - - 12/20/2000 57.19 -none 50.2424.1 MARTS, DEBT 55.36 26.38 28.98 - - 11/17/2000 28.98 -none 4.0580.2 MASON, JAMES E 75.63 39.07 36.56 - - 11/24/2000 73.28 - 51.0514.1 MATHEWS, DONNA 55.22 26.38 28.84 - - 12/07/2000 42.37 -none 4.2341.1 MAVERICK COUNTRY STORE #2 63.18. - 63.18 - - 11/17/2000 124.74 -none 4.1626.1 MAXEY, SHANE & MICHELLE 89.44 46.59 42.85 - - 12/07/2000 59.00 -none 51.3616.1 MAYFIELD, ROBERT 238.04 104.26 133.78 - - 11/2412000 128.86 -none 1.0074.3 MCAFFEE, ANITA 69.50 34.09 35.41 - - 12/13/2000 55.50 - 65.0884.1 MCALVAIN CONSTRUCTION 409.37 112.77 296.60 - - 11/16/2000 253.81 - 75.2000.1 MCALVAIN CONSTRUCTION 978.26 104.97 873.29 - - 11/16/2000 6.48 - 20.0086.1 MCARTHUR, DAVID & VICKIE 111.12 26.38 26.38 58.36 - 10/16/2000 72.05 -none 34.1314.1 MCARTHUR, SYMPHONI 88.37 32.86 55.51 - - 12/01/2000 84.45 -none 1.2050.1 MCBRIDE, D.B. 225.87 35.38 25.38 27.84 137.27 11/16/2000 169.00 -none 33.2266.1 MCBRIDE, KEVIN 181.78 120.39 61.39 - - 12/19/2000 60.00 -none 31.3598.1 MCCAFFREY, IVAN 64.16 32.86 31.30 - - 11/17/2000 216.29 -none 5.0508.1 MCCARTHY, MIKE 77.69 32.86 44.83 - - 11/20/2000 79.27 -none 46.0512.2 MCCLAIN, TROY 62.12 37.70 24.42 - - 11/24/2000 50.00 - 42.2072.1 MCCLINTICK, TODD & LEISA 128.69 73.26 55.43 - - 12/20/2000 61.58 -none 46.0256.1 MCCULLOUGH, FLOYD 64.00 35.24 28.76 - - 11/22/2000 28.76 -none 1.0170.2 MCCURDY, NATHAN 100.14 45.24 29.99 24.91 - 11/30/2000 53.76 - 2.2586.1 MCCURRY, ARTHUR 103.45 31.86 27.84 43.75 - 10/12/2000 58.36 -none "' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- wuncil Page: 13 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:50pm Current Period: 01/31!2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11130/2000 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 2.5350.1 MCEVOY, SAMUEL C. 97.54 53.10 44.44 - - 12/01/2000 49.36 -none 2.3660.1 MCFADDEN, LEONARD 61.08 35.69 25.39 - - 12/11/2000 27.00 -none 68.0098.1 MCGILVERY, BELINDA 83.10 40.25 42.85 - - 12/20/2000 170.56 -none 31.3242.1 MCGOWAN, DAVID E. 85.63 42.98 42.65 - - 12/20/2000 43.88 -none 34.1854.1 MCGURER, WAYNE 91.48 42.76 48.72 - - 12/18/2000 74.55 -none 2.6270.2 MCKINLEY, JUNE 89.60 51.73 37.87 - - 12/26/2000 45.25 - 2.4870.3 MCKINLEY, JUNE 121.26 80.88 40.38 - - 12/18/2000 50.00 - 22.1434.1 MCMASTER, WILLIAM 65.69 34.24 31.45 - - 11/14/2000 44.98 -none 31.2192.1 MCMILLAN, VICKI 125.53 50.42 75.11 - - 11/22/2000 233.03 -none 42.1796.1 MCOUILKIN, CURTIS 80.41 41.53 38.88 - - 12/18/2000 35.19 -none 4.1386.1 MCOUIRK, LANCE 191.00 61.69 77.66 51.65 - 11/27/2000 85.04 -none 20.0130.2 MCREYNOLDS, MARTY 89.60 53.10 36.50 - - 11/27/2000 51.26 - 69.1238.1 MELGARD, ROBERT 52.76 26.38 26.38 - - 11/24/2000 42.37 -none 1.2730.1 MELLEN, ANGELA 152.50 68.16 41.42 42.92 - 11 /29/2000 55.00 -none 21.1132.1 MELTON, GARY 87.93 46.59 41.34 - - 01/02/2001 64.87 -none 19.0842.2 MENARD, ALAN 70.87 36.69 34.18 - - 11/22/2000 35.41 - 52.1090.1 MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY 6,669.09 16.88 522.44 3,808.74 2,321.03 09/25/2000 1,711.33 -none 52.1100.1 MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY 1,627.39 16.88 16.88 860.47 733.16 09/25/2000 725.50 -none 42.2552.1 METHNER, JACK C. 77.02 41.75 35.27 - - 11/20/2000 113.75 -none 21.0094.1 METIVIER, JAMES 118.00 47.96 40.11 29.93 - .11/29/2000 40.00 -none 50.3848.1 MEYERS, DAN 73.14 34.04 39.10 - - 12/13/2000 35.41 -none 19.7124.1 MEYERS, TROY & JIMI 86.28 56.71 29.57 - - 11/22/2000 70.00 - 4.0888.1 MICHAEL CAMPBELL CONSTRU( 151.37 89.59 61.78 - - 11/24/2000 133.40 -none 52.6302.1 MICHAEL FALASH, INC 238.36 119.18 119.18 - - 12/15/2000 119.18 - 74.1032.1 MICHAELSON, BRADLY C. 83.14 47.87 35.27 - - 12/18/2000 32.81 -none 19.1708.2 MICHAS, JAMES 112.00 59.31 52.69 - - 12/11/2000 56.38 - 69.0650.2 MICHELETTI, RANDY 71.91 34.04 37.87 - - 11/28/2000 92.98 - 2.6050.1 MIDDLEBROOK, JOYCE 82.10 48.19 33.91 - - 12/04/2000 47.44 -none 20.0060.1 MIILLER, JOHN 65.39 32.86 32.53 - - 11/21/2000 59.59 -none 74.3696.1 MILLER, GREGORY & ERICA 101.85 30.21 36.64 35.00 - 11/27/2000 40.00 - 34.1964.2 MILLER, RICKEY 86.05 48.04 38.01 - - 12/19/2000 46.62 - 42.1146.2 MILLER, WADE 104.62 61.91 42.71 - - 11/20/2000 121.17 - 46.0406.1 MILLS, TIMOTHY 84.68 46.81 37.87 - - 11/28/2000 37.87 -none 32.1108.2 MILNER, BRIAN 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - - 22.1152.1 MINSEW, CASEY 72.89 35.24 37.65 - - 11/22/2000 64.71 -none 1.2420.1 MIRONOV, BARBARA & OLEG 89.60 50.50 39.10 - - 11/22/2000 44.02 -none 20.1498.1 MITCHELL, MARK 84.68 49.27 35.41 - - 11/22/2000 37.87 -none 21.2820.1 MOGEL, BRYAN 64.00 35.24 28.76 - - 11 /29/2000 94.50 -none 32.1732.2 MOIR, MICHAEL 99.16 44.35 31.44 23.37 - 12/20/2000 31.44 - 20.1652.2 MOLEBASH, JOHN & MONICA 129.52 63.36 66.16 - - 12/21/2000 62.47 - 34.0904.2 MOLENAAR, DIANA 458.90 49.36 45.11 42.65 321.78 09/15/2000 174.42 - 33.4264.2 MOMA, MICHAEL 73.05 40.38 32.67 - - 12/04/2000 30.21 - 33.2542.1 MONROE, TIMOTHY & CARLA 240.32 108.19 35.27 34.04 62.82 10/02/2000 40.00 -none 34.1540.1 MONTEFERRANTE, MICHELLE 62.14 36.69 25.45 - - 12/22/2000 30.00 -none 2.3742.1 MONTGOMERY, DENNIS 112.30 70.88 41.42 - - 12/05/2000 111.29 -none 74.2832.1 MOONEY, KEVIN 100.41 59.40 40.39 .62 - 11/24/2000 95.00 -none 46.0222.1 MOORE, KEVIN & LISA 86.20 49.27 36.93 - - 12/20/2000 40.00 -none 32.0816.1 MOORE, RICK T. 97.26 48.04 49.22 - - 12/07/2000 59.06 -none 4.1634.1 MOORE, RUSSELL C 92.61 42.86 49.75 - - 11/30/2000 95.97 -none 32.0806.2 MORGAN, CHARLES 105.98 42.98 62.47 .53 - 12/07/2000 67.39 - 50.2256.1 MORGAN, SHERRY 101.29 37.87 63.42 - - 12/01/2000 48.66 -none 34.1026.1 MORRISON, DWAYNE 105.87 51.87 54.00 - - 11/24/2000 146.29 -none 2.5630.1 MORRISON, DWAYNE 151.64 97.41 54.23 - - 12/20/2000 90.00 -none 69.0480.1 MORTENSEN, DAVID 67.36 28.76 38.60 - - 11/15/2000 50.90 -none 74.2666.1 MOSER, CAROLYN 132.19 70.89 61.30 - - 11/27/2000 124.71 -none •" in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 14 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:50pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 2.0526.1 MOSSI, DAVID L 195.32 75.94 82.32 37.06 - 12/18/2000 82.32 -none 34.0500.1 MOURITSEN, LAYNE 103.55 58.16 45.39 - - 01/02/2001 71.22 -none 0012.1 MR. SANDMAN MOTEL 75 62.09 26.74 35.35 - - 11/22/2000 39.04 -none . 0136.1 MUGELE, NICK 50 65.48 30.21 35.27 - - 11 /28/2000 88.32 -none . 3216.1 MUIR, GRANT 74 89.39 59.40 29.99 - - 11/22/2000 42.29 -none . 0118.1 MULLANIX, MATT 72 57.52 28.76 28.76 - - 11/28/2000 29.99 -none . 21.1122.1 MULLIN, MICHAEL 70.29 37.70 32.59 - - 11 /28/2000 32.59 -none 1574.1 MULLINS, ROBERT 4 72.75 39.07 33.68 - - 11/24/2000 36.14 -none . 1686.1 MURPHY, JACK 34 75.79 41.75 34.04 - - 11/24/2000 143.27 -none . 1804.1 MURPHY, WILLIAM 4 129.13 43.96 37.65 45.03 2.49 12/18/2000 60.00 -none . 0482.1 MURRAY, SONDF2A MURRAY 51 69.17 34.04 35.13 - - 12/15/2000 51.12 -none . 0450.1 MURRI'S ELECTRONICS 51 130.88 65.44 65.44 - - 11/24/2000 65.44 -none . 1328.1 MUSSELL, TIM 50 678.93 318.40 360.53 - - 12/04/2000 314.57 -none . 0308.2 MUSSELL, TIM 50 101.88 50.94 50.94 - - 12/04/2000 50.94 - . 74.2720.1 MYERS, SHIRLEY 66.55 32.59 33.96 - - 11/22/2000 33.96 -none 6572.1 NP,KAGAWA, KATHY 19 73.56 44.13 29.43 - - .12/14/2000 45.00 -none . 3.0808.1 NASADOS, JAMES 117.17 74.37 42.80 - - 01 /04/2001 50.00 -none 14.5037.2 NASH, TIERA 71.80 35.24 36.56 - - 12/20/2000 37.79 - 0816.1 NAVA, BENNY 5 82.73 36.47 46.26 - - 12/04/2000 69.63 -none . 2150.1 NEAGLE, LOUIE J 2 81.45 43.21 38.24 - - 11/22!2000 91.20 -none . 2302.1 NEAL, KEVIN & MICHELLE 69 66.41 32.59 33.82 - - 11/16/2000 35.05 -none . 1692.2 NEEDS, STEVEN 20 189.33 78.20 46.26 64.87 - 11/30/2000 53.72 - . 46.0396.1 NEHER, TANYA 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/17/2000 26.38 -none 2150.1 NELSON, RYAN & JILL 50 74.25 40.21 34.04 - - 11/30/2000 65.78 -none . 2000.1 NESBIT, RICHARD & BARBARA 1 81.94 48.04 33.90 - - 11/21/2000 33.90 -none . 4110.2 NESMITH, STEVE 51 184.59 95.32 50.17 39.10 - 11/27/2000 33.11 - . 2268.1 NEW LIFE CHRISTIAN CENTER 69 113.74 55.57 58.17 - - 11/22/2000 186.53 -none . 2.5930.1 NIBLETT, JOSEPH L 83.31 48.04 35.27 - - 11/16/2000 35.27 -none 31.0880.1 NICK, DENNIS 120.72 74.71 46.01 - - 11/28/2000 128.00 -none 2704.1 NICKELL, TROY 42 84.38 45.36 39.02 - - 11/24/2000 37.79 -none . 5740.1 NIMMO, MONA 2 61.70 32.86 28.84 - - 12/04/2000 39.91 -none . 0726.1 NITZ, JASON 31 158.52 37.92 26.38 94.22 - 10/25/2000 91.53 -none . 2294.2 NOBLE, ROBERT 4 116.11 52.88 63.23 - - 12/12/2000 87.83 - . 2262.1 NOLAN, ROBERT 31 1,028.35 980.58 47.77 - - 12/07/2000 46.54 -none . 0498.1 NOLAND, SHAWN 21 64.30 34.09 30.21 - - 12/18/2000 32.67 -none . 1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEF 1460 50 312.94 67.52 67.52 57.58 120.32 06/20/2000 69.68 -none . . 1464.1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEF 50 140.80 90.30 50.50 - - 12/18/2000 105.62 -none . 0020.2 OAK, JERRY 50 63.16 26.38 36.78 - - 11/22/2000 46.62 - . 1 OAKBROOK PLAZA 0701 42 320.76 - 301.32 19.44 - 12/19/2000 617.22 - . . 0228.1 OASIS CONSTRUCTION 35 94.68 60.50 34.18 - - 11/29/2000 56.45- . 1530.1 OBENCHAIN, JAIME 2 114.36 70.62 43.74 - 12/20/2000 40.00 -none . 5370.1 ODOM, SHERRY 2 109.58 63.22 45.53 .83 - 11/20/2000 99.00 -none . 1 OFFICE DEPOT # 2087 5010 46 1,334.73 300.25 692.21 342.27 - 12/22/2000 456.94 - . . 1598.1 OGAN, JOHN & DAW N 4 74.75 40.30 34.45 - - 12/07/2000 42.00 -none . 1396.1 OGLESBEE, DAVID & MARITA 20 103.67 51.87 51.80 - - 12!19/2000 61.00 -none . 4516.1 OKE, DARREN & PAMELA 33 97.26 56.93 40.33 - - 12/21/2000 48.94 -none . 4990.2 OLD NAVY # 6046 46 213.96 51.72 162.24 - - 09/25/2000 40.96 - . 2166.3 O'NEIL,MICHAEL 21 81.78 43.99 37.79 - - 11/27/2000 70.74- . 1 OSTERHOUT, JUSTIN 1918 50 81.90 32.59 49.31 - - 12/18/2000 38.00 -none . . 0798.1 OVERSETH, TEENA 46 56.76 34.09 22.67 - - 11/27/2000 80.00 -none . 3430.1 OVERTON, DAVID C 51 143.45 26.38 31.44 38.82 46.81 12/18/2000 30.00 -none . 50.0192.1 OVERTON, MRS. TOM 50.76 25.38 25.38 - - 11/22/2000 2.50 -none ~~' 2094.2 OVERY, ROBBY 13 293.14 45.58 31.44 31.44 184.68 - . 0268.1 OW EN, KENNETH 72 57.52 28.76 28.76 - - 11!29/2000 28.76 -none . 50.3898.1 OW EN, KEVIN 72.19 30.21 38.96 3.02 - 11/27/2000 40.00 -none '•` in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ~ ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 15 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:50pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 33.2320.2 OZUNA, MARIO 107.12 69.25 37.87 - - 12/27/2000 23.44 - 22.0454.1 P. JANSSON, JANIE 122.00 76.83 45.17 - - 12/19/2000 52.55 -none 2.1280.1 PACK, EARL 72.42 39.38 33.04 - - 11/28/2000 42.88 -none 21.2230.1 PAGE, LINDA 105.12 69.71 34.91 .50 - 12/20/2000 28.26 -none 32.0638.2 PALMER, PAT 179.34 68.42 47.57 54.95 8.40 12/14/2000 50.00 - 21.2114.2 PALMER, PAT 67.69 35.24 32.45 - - 11/16/2000 29.99 - 31.3280.1 PALMER, PAT 246.18 159.22 86.96 - - 12/20/2000 75.89 -none 69.0300.1 PARK, JON & TESSIA 90.62 44.08 46.54 - - 11/22/2000 83.32 -none 34.3260.1 PARK, YOUNG KIL & KI SOON 71.68 40.38 31.30 - - 11/24/2000 43.60 -none 31.0734.1 PARKS, RONALD 64.30 32.86 31.44 - - 12/05/2000 44.97 -none 21.3011.1 PARKWOOD MEADOWS HOMEC 272.06 71.90 126.98 73.18 - 11/02/2000 432.54 -none 74.3044.1 PARRISH, STEVE 120.75 40.25 40.25 40.25 - 11/20/2000 39.10 -none 74.2750.2 PASLEY, KURT & SERENA 68.01 44.08 23.93 - - - 20.0104.1 PATCHIN, ROBERT 67.69 35.24 32.45 - - 11/20/2000 37.37 -none 33.2762.1 PATTERSON, DAVID 107.08 71.89 35.19 - - 11/24/2000 41.77 -none 22.2286.1 PCOLAR, EDWARD 71.66 35.24 36.42 - - 11/20/2000 35.19 -none 15.0048.2 PEBBLES-KORBER, GAIL 54.63 34.09 20.54 - - 12/22/2000 50.00 - 34.0896.1 PERIN, LOA L. 79.62 44.35 35.27 - - 11/24/2000 167.87 -none 51.0746.3 PERKINS, CHARLES 60.56 26.38 34.18 - - 11/24/2000 66.06 - 34.1296.1 PERKINS, GREGORY & KATY 77.02 42.98 34.04 - - 11/17/2000 45.11 -none 35.0421.2 PERRAULT, KENT 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - 11!27/2000 34.18 - 69.0214.1 PERRY, DAN & LORI 89.55 49.36 40.19 - - 11/28/2000 35.27 -none 33.2308.1 PERRY, DIANNE 97.12 57.07 40.05 - - 11/15/2000 57.01 -none 4.1326.2 PERRY, JARED & MICHELLE 171.26 143.56 27.70 - - 12/07/2000 34.18 - 1.1200.2 PERSIMMON RENTALS 85.31 49.27 36.04 - - 12/15/2000 41.00 - 21.3160.1 PETERSEN, DOUGLAS & JENNIF 93.00 54.13 38.87 - - 01/02/2001 88.08 -none 22.1430.2 PETERSON, ERIC 118.59 70.88 47.71 - - 11/21/2000 62.47 - 20.0044.1 PHILLIPS, BYRON 92.34 45.58 46.76 - - 11/20/2000 75.05 -none 42.1842.1 PHILLIPS, JAMES 63.07 36.69 26.38 - - 11/20/2000 66.45 -none 19.0226.1 PHILLIPS, MICHAEL 66.90 32.86 34.04 - - 11/24/2000 31.58 -none 74.3000.1 PHILLIPS, RICHARD 82.84 46.42 36.42 - - 12/20/2000 47.65 -none 31.3264.1 PICCIOTTI, NICHOLAS 110.12 58.16 51.96 - - 12/18/2000 48.27 -none 31.0776.1 PIEPMEYER, THOMAS 88.25 59.41 28.84 - - 12/27!2000 99.66 -none 2.6010.1 PIEPMEYER, TOM 77.02 32.86 44.16 - - 11/20/2000 229.96 -none 42.1160.1 PIETRZAK, JOHN 82.99 52.88 30.11 - - 11/30/2000 47.65 -none 19.7400.1 PINNACLE HOMES 123.42 50.30 36.56 36.56 - 11/29/2000 40.33 -none 50.0206.1 PIONEER FEDERAL CREDIT UNIT 52.76 26.38 26.38 - - 11/01/2000 99.62 -none 42.0348.1 PIPAL, RANDALL & JULIE 71.47 40.30 31.17 - - 12/20/2000. 50.00 -none 2.1870.1 PIPER, LARRY 61.70 34.09 27.61 - - 12/07/2000 37.61 -none 32.1590.1 PISCHEL, DEBORAH 92.20 56.93 35.27 -, - 12/20/2000 34.04 -none 21.2678.1 PITMAN, DONALD 91.20 39.07 52.13 - - 11 /22/2000 138.94 -none 19.6644.1 PLACE, WILLIAM 66.60 35.24 31.36 - - 12/20/2000 31.36 -none 5.0684.1 PLAISTED, KENT 93.15 55.70 37.45 - - 11/22/2000 43.60 -none 4.1412.1 PLUMLEY, RODNEY & M. NAOMI 71.66 35.24 36.42 - - 12/19/2000 59.79 -none 4.1670.1 POGUE, LINDA 102.50 54.25 38.88 9.37 - 12/18/2000 65.00 -none 21.1932.1 POINDEXTER, RICHARD I 114.46 66.97 47.49 - - 11/27/2000 47.49 -none 19.0240.1 PONZETTI, JAMES 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/21/2000 26.38 -none 21.2604.1 PORTER, RODNEY 99.14 47.82 51.32 - - 11/27/2000 133.47 -none 3.0116.1 PORTER, TAD 74.12 40.30 33.82 - - 11/2212000 32.59 -none 64.4062.2 POTTER, HEIDI 79.62 44.21 35.41 - - 11/24/2000 35.41 - 50.2402.1 POW ELL, RANDY 100.54 49.36 51.18 - - 01/02/2001 48.00 -none 4.1886.1 PRESCOTT, RANDY 102.02 54.25 47.77 - - 12/20/2000 65.14 -none 13.2032.2 PRICE, JOHN 67.05. 42.37 24.68 - - - 7.0248.1 PRICE, RICHARD 83.01 45.36 35.19 2.46 - 12/20/2000 35.19 -none 74.3418.2 PRINDLE, SHELLY 105.79 32.59 37.79 35.41 - 11/27/2000 48.03 - "' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 16 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:50pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmf Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 21.1828.2 PRINTZ, DENIA 83.73 37.92 45.81 - - 12/19/2000 47.04 - 4.2248.2 PUCKETT, RUSSELL 97.01 70.80 26.21 - - 12/18/2000 100.00 - 74.3066.1 PUGSLEY, TAMARA 80.50 44.08 36.42 - - 11/16/2000 70.46 -none 19.4412.1 PUPPOS, TERRY 1,138.21 1,106.85 31.36 - - 11/27/2000 31.36 -none 22.1558.1 QUANSTROM, RICK 97.91 47.82 50.09 - - 12/01/2000 57.47 -none 46.0322.1 QUATTLEBAUM, JAMES & BARBS 178.49 38.76 46.96 46.96 45.81 10/02/2000 65.49 -none 52.1070.1 R.T. NAHAS CO. 497.20 248.60 248.60 - - 11/24/2000 248.60 -none 4.2074.1 RAMZA, RONALD 119.01 77.45 41.56 - - 11/20/2000 53.86 -none 2.1450.1 RANSLEY, MICHAEL E 163.20 106.18 57.02 - - 12/18/2000 80.00 -none 46.0864.1 RASMUSSEN, RONALD 79.18 41.53 37.65 - - 12/20/2000 38.88 -none 35.1206.1 RAY & TARA BOLINGER 74.70 40.52 34.18 - - 12/21/2000 31.98 - 50.1380.1 RAYMOND, CHACE 63.36 31.68 31.68 - - 11 /24/2000 62.96 -none 14.4466.1 RCI 73.53 39.45 34.08 - - 12/05/2000 47.65 - 50.2390.2 REED, LORETTA 132.91 68.51 64.40 - - 11/27/2000 163.40 - 2.2160.1 REEVES, GARY 78.25 42.98 35.27 - - 12/22/2000 40.19 -none 42.2730.1 REPACI, LYNETTE 121.17 66.83 54.34 - - 11/24/2000 88.10 -none 4.0542.2 RES, SHAWN 108.59 59.45 49.14 - - 11/22!2000 95.90 - 2L2918.1 REYES, DAVID & KAREN 102.02 58.08 43.94 - - 12/21/2000 62.39 -none 1.3958.1 RH VALLA 164.03 103.44 60.59 - - 12/01/2000 47.52 - 33.4578.1 RHINEHART, DOUG & MARY 90.83 50.64 40.19 - - 12/01!2000 60.09 -none 32.1694.1 RICE, E. DONALD 106.15 59.25 46.90 - - 12/20/2000 61.61 -none 20.1786.1 RICE, JOSEPH 85.33 47.96 37.37 - - 11/27/2000 .52.21 -none 33.3666.1 RICH, STEVEN 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/27/2000 26.38 -none 19.0840.1 RICHARDSHOMES 94.74 26.38 34.18 34.18 - 11/01/2000 31.88- 4.2320.1 RICHARDSON, ROD 92.10 56.71 35.39 - - 12/05/2000 107.05 -none 51.3154.2 RICKORDS, SHANNON 78.99 40.25 38.74 - - 11/20/2000 92.69 - 34.1694.1 RIDGEWAY, STEPHAN 115.04 64.45 50.59 - - 12/28/2000 69.04 -none 4.2038.1 RIESKE, LARRY 64.00 35.24 28.76 - - 12/18/2000 54.59 -none 4.1838.1 RIGGS, ROBERT 84.38 46.59 37.79 - - 12/21/2000 53.55 -none 34.0786.1 RILEY, MARK 155.52 97.41 58.11 - - 12/20/2000 74.10 -none 42.2514.1 RIMMER, NICOLA 64.16 35.32 28.84 - - 12/27!2000 44.83 -none 21.2966.1 RINEHART, MICHAEL & SUZANN 80.57 42.98 37.59 - - 12/05/2000 37.59 -none 42.1844.1 RIVERA, REGENA 179.41 60.42 38.88 80.11 - 11/29/2000 114.10 -none 21.0584.2 RIVERA, RICHARD & DENISE 85.17 37.62 47.55 - - 12/05/2000 64.77 - 32.0458.2 ROAM, JACQUELINE 276.79 213.23 63.56 - - 11/22/2000 48.80 - 21.0492.1 ROBERTS, CHARLES 67.25 37.70 29.55 - - 12/20/2000 31.00 -none 51.3300.1 ROBERTS, DAVID 62.76 36.38 26.38 - - 11!29/2000 99.82 -none 74.3210.1 ROBINSON, LONNIE 65.18 32.59 32.59 - - 11/27/2000 35.05 -none 50.2106.1 ROBINSON, RICHARD & PRISCIL 135.26 44.04 52.10 39.12 - 11/29/2000 100.00 -none 50.4534.1 ROCKE, SEAN 52.76 26.38 26.38 - - 12/01/2000 36.38 -none 2.5170.1 RODRIGUEZ, JILL 88.72 53.10 35.62 - - 01/12/2001 50.00 -none 51.3310.1 ROGERS, MILDRED 50.76 25.38 25.38 - - 12/01/2000 25.38 -none 74.3090.1 ROGERS, WAYNE & SUSAN 57.52 28.76 28.76 - - 12/12/2000 28.76 -none 69.1614.1 ROHM, FRANK 82.72 28.76 53.96 - - 12/20/2000 68.00 -none 65.0454.1 ROHM, RODNEY 69.24 42.86 26.38 - - 11/29/2000 50.46 -none 21.2006.1 ROSE, MARK & TAMARA 87.87 49.27 38.60 - - 12/20/2000 50.00 -none 34.1738.1 ROSKELLY, KEITH 159.49 88.52 70.97 - - 11/27/2000 277.40 -none 52.0316.1 RT NAHAS CO 828.58 380.58 248.00 - 12/22/2000 392.07 -none 47.0060.2 RUBOSKY, ROSANN 66.09 32.86 33.23 - - 11/22/2000 67.00 - 69.1076.1 RUPERT, DAVID & LAURIE 69.38 47.91 21.47 - - 11/24/2000 90.00 -none 2.3180.1 RYAN, WALTER 116.21 42.86 26.38 46.97 - 11/29/2000 85.00 -none 19.7156.1 SALAZAR, DANIEL 83.03 46.81 36.22 - - 12/04/2000 71.53 - 1.3270.2 SAMS,DOUG 282.12 150.33 131.79 - - 11/22/2000 324.77- 74.3710.1 SANDOVAL, WALTER & MIREYA 76.07 30.21 35.41 10.45 - 01/10/2001 30.21 - 51.1129.1 SANTEE CONSTRUCTION 207.99 163.94 44.05 - - 12/07/2000 61.87 - '•* in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 17 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:SOpm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 74.0354.1 SAUNDERS, MICHAEL & STACY 72.84 36.42 36.42 - - 12/05/2000 42.57 -none 34.1858.1 SAUVAGEAU, KEVIN J 103.83 46.67 57.16 - - 11/22/2000 .82.99 -none 34.1078.2 SAVELBERG, DOYLE 186.22 89.63 31.30 38.84 26.45 10/19/2000 50.00 - 2.1150.1 SAYLES, LOYAL 92.20 54.33 37.87 - - 11/17/2000 52.63 -none 22.1386.1 SCHAEFFER, MICHAEL 94.50 51.65 42.85 - - 12/05/2000 77.29 -none 74.0382.1 SCHILDHAUER, YOLANDA 73.02 40.21 32.81 - - 12/04/2000 55.93 -none 2.2270.3 SCHIMPF, FRED 84.68 48.04 36.64 - - 11/27/2000 82.05 - 34.2122.1 SCHMIDT, GLEN 113.05 63.22 36.36 13.47 - 11/21/2000 100.00 -none 34.2144.1 SCHRANK, THOMAS A 196.58 97.29 99.29 - - 12/14/2000 126.35 -none 32.0622.3 SCHUSTER, BILL & LESLIE 105.87 60.62 45.25 - - 12/11/2000 44.26 - 31.3018.2 SCHUSTER, FORREST & DEBBIE 141.42 60.76 39.10 41.56 - 12/05/2000 71.24 - 52.6396.1 SCHWAN'S SALES 41.39 19.44 19.44 2.51 - - 3.0042.1 SCHWEND, LUVMINDA 104.49 61.99 42.50 - - 12/21/2000 55.00 -none 19.7504.2 SCUDDER, JOSEPH 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/20/2000 26.38 - 1.1915.1 SEABURY 316.18 - 63.18 167.14 85.86 08/24/2000 52.78 - 20.1338.2 SEARLE, DARRIN 70.73 44.35 26.38 - - 11/16/2000 26.38 - 51.0778.3 SECOND CHURCH CHRIST 502.15 381.38 120.77 - - - 69.2262.1 SEDILLO, JOE 312.83 220.42 92.41 - - 12/20/2000 128.08 -none 31.0212.3 SELLS, CASEY 126.38 79.77 46.48 .13 - 12/15/2000 45.12 - 3.0832.1 SEVERSON, DENA 101.20 28.76 28.76 43.68 - 10/20/2000 :58.91 -none 21.2904.1 SEVIERI, MIKE 66.60 35.24 31.36 - - 11/27/2000 33.82 -none 74.2890.1 SHAFFER, ROBERT 83.40 45.53 37.87 - - 11/24/2000 150.14 -none 42.2558.1 SHARDLOW, THOMAS E 237.29 161.96 75.33 - - 11/15/2000 77.79 -none 51.3108.1 SHARIAT PANAHI, ARASH 46.52 23.26 23.26 - - 11/22/2000 56.14 -none 2.2930.1 SHARP, LEE 82.62 31.86 25.38 25.38 - 10/04/2000 24.11 -none 34.1022.1 SHAW, DANIEL 150.14 53.10 42.37 54.67 - 11/28/2000 110.18 -none 21.2710.1 SHEARER, STEVEN 77.95 45.36 32.59 - - 11/06/2000 196.87 -none 21.2784.1 SHEILDS, OPAL 97.54 49.27 48.27 - - 12/05/2000 50.73 -none 74.0322.2 SHELDON, PAM 66.85 30.21 36.64 - - 12/21/2000 50.12 - 42.2526.1 SHELTROWN, ROGER 97.10 65.88 31.22 - - 11/27/2000 124.18 -none 46.0114.1 SHELVOCK, RICHARD 88.51 53.10 35.41 - - 11/21/2000 34.18 -none 2.2180.1 SHEPARD, DUWAIN 113.51 66.83 46.68 - - 12/05/2000 47.91 -none 74.3960.1 SHERARD, BILL 101.99 54.08 47.91 - - 12/20/2000 30.74 -none 22.1832.2 SHIELDS, CHRISTEN 74.70 40.52 34.18 - - 12/07/2000 17.63 - 74.2758.1 SHIELDS, JOHNNY 128.39 2.38 - 49.16 76.85 01/08/2001 25.00 -none 4.1878.2 SHIRLEY, GARRY 132.52 64.37 68.15 - - 11/27/2000 79.22 - 42.2496.1 SIEMON, LESLIE 94.53 50.42 44.08 .03 - 12/05/2000 55.12 -none 74.3096.1 SIGMOND, SERGIO 66.31 44.08 22.23 - - 12/18/2000 50.00 -none 34.0724.2 SILCOX, BENJAMIN 443.99 65.68 46.06 332.25 - 10/30/2000 164.77 - 22.0854.1 SILLBAUGH, DAVID & NORMA 104.62 36.47 65.69 2.46 - 12/20/2000 65.69 -none 21.0208.1 SILSBY, TERRY 99.56 46.59 52.97 - - 11/28/2000 201.96 -none 2.2500.1 SILVA, JOSEPH 192.45 111.36 81.09 - - 12/13/2000 86.01 -none 69.1292.3 SIMMONS, BRETT 72.72 34.04 38.68 - - 12/04/2000 53.44 - 4.1632.1 SIMMONS, JOHN & JANA 86.70 50.42 36.28 - - 12/19/2000 48.58 -none 22.1504.1 SIMPSON, RANDY 76.58 42.76 33.82 - - 11/27/2000 92.32 -none 31.3028.2 SIMS, JERRY & MICHELLE 95.89- 55.56 40.33 - - 11/28/2000 85.74 - 31.3236.2 SINCLAIR, KEN 84.37 52.98 31,.39 - - 11/30/2000 70.47 - 21,2836.2 SINGLETON,RODNEY 120.56 48.85 41.40 30.31 - 12/01/2000 60.00- 34.0436.1 SKELTON, RANDY 162.98 42.86 29.46 46.12 44.54 10/17!2000 70.00 -none 2.0426.1 SKENE, JAMES 70.31 32.86 37.45 - - 11115/2000 68.20 -none 20.0438.1 SLATTERY, GREG 89.27 60.54 28.73 - - 11/24/2000 92.88 - 2.1200.1 SMART, B & K STEWART 107.24 61.85 45.39 - - 12/21!2000 43.39 -none 50.0138.1 SMITH, BARBARA 52.76 26.38 26.38 - - 11/14/2000 26.38 -none 31.0134.1 SMITH, BRADLEY 170.41 68.28 54.14 47.99 - 11/20/2000 61.55 -none 21.3010.1 SMITH, BRYAN 66.60 36.69 27.61 2.30 - 01/03/2001 31.22 -none "' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to lie sent r~ CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 18 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:50pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10!31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 35.0469.2 SMITH, GREY 74.56 39.15 35.41 - - 11/29/2000 34.18 - 65.0622.2 SMITH, JODY 94.36 52.88 41.48 - - 12/15/2000 40.25 - 4.0532.1 SMITH, JOHN 79.01 47.96 31.05 - - 12/20/2000 40.00 -none 2.0400.1 SMITH, LARRY R 181.77 127.63 54.14 - - 11/27/2000 120.74 -none 2.1700.2 SMITH, LEON & JANICE 97.48 75.35 22.13 - - 12/20/2000 24.59 - 50.0012.1 SMITH, PAUL H. 77.48 34.04 43.44 - - 12/19/2000 50.00 -none 43.2426.3 SMITH, RANDALL 94.74 26.38 34.18 34.18 - - 42.0444.1 SMITH, RANDALL LEE 67.84 42.90 24.94 - - 12/18/2000 12.57 -none 21.2168.2 SMITH, RORY 161.11 101.04 60.07 - - 11/29/2000 104.23- 2.6170.1 SMITH, SHANE 120.90 80.78 39.83 .29 - 01/05/2001 63.23 -none 69.0180.1 SNIDER, JERRY 109.17 56.50 52.67 - - 12/05/2000 51.44 -none 34.0726.2 SOMSEN, GAYLENE 75.79 37.92 37.87 - - 12/20/2000 37.87 - 2.5790.1 SOULE, LINDA 60.47 32.86 27.61 - - 11/24/2000 104.08 -none 2.0900.2 SOUZA, JR., WILLIAM 60.77 36.69 24.08 - - 01/02!2001 27.61 - 21.3164.1 SOWER, MICHAEL 104.94 40.30 64.64 - - 12/18/2000 60.00 -none 31.0548.1 SPARKS, ROBERT 77.95 44.13 33.82 - - 11/27/2000 82.46 -none 33.3752.1 SPATH, SIDNEY 107.22 64.37 42.85 - - 11/27/2000 61.30 -none 2.3430.1 SPEARS, BRYCE J. 148.34 55.56 47.85 44.93 - 12/20/2000 70.00 -none 31.0874.1 SPELLMAN, EDWARD E. 100.95 58.16 42.79 - - 12/13/2000 45.25 -none 69.1190.1 SPENCER, DARRELL 96.49 56.46 40.03 - - 11/29/2000 189.53 -none 19.6654.1 SPENCER, SLOAN 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/17/2000 26.38 -none 31.3486.1 SPRAGUE, ARTHUR 88.47 49.27 39.10 .10 - 11/20/2000 36.54 -none 20.2999.1 SPRINKLER -BRENDA ESTATES 68.32 18.10 9.72 11.34 29.16 - 32.1598.2 STAGGS, DUKE 68.13 41.75 26.38 - - 11/22/2000 26.38 - 3.0844.1 STAMMERJOHN, JIMMY 64.00 35.24 28.76 - - 11/28/2000 68.83 -none 34.1862.1 STANIFER, PAMELA 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/16/2000 36.22 -none 2.0500.1 STARR, DAVID 73.05 44.21 28.84 - - 11/24/2000 67.79 -none 2.1160.1 STATES, DION 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11/27/2000 102.28 -none 2.4520.2 STEBBINS, JODIE 113.46 61.99 50.59 .88 - 12/20/2000 50.00 - 3.0842.1 STEED, CHRISTOPHER 70.43 39.07 31.36 - - 12/15/2000 31.36 -none 20.1960.1 STEIN, MIKE & JOYCE 74.12 40.30 33.82 - - 11/27/2000 43.66 -none 22.1048.1 STENER, THURSTON 308.84 73.12 63.62 80.84 91.26 12/19/2000 106.00 -none 51.3280.1 STENSON, VIRGINIA 305.59 - - - 305.59 - none 31.0190.1 STEPHEN, BRET & DEBORAH 79.76 44.35 35.41 - - 12/27/2000 36.64 -none 31.0496.1 STERTZ, SUSAN 85.91 41.61 44.30 - - 11/27/2000 83.84 -none 42.3044.1 STEVE BUBLITZ 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 12/01/2000 36.38 -none 33.3620.1 STEVENS, RONALD & NANCY 107.66 56.93 50.73 - - 11/24/2000 47.04 -none 33.0221.1 STEVENSON, IRIS 33.23 - 6.85 26.38 - 10/10/2000 24.13 -none 2.5400.1 STEVENSON, MICHAEL 73.19 37.92 35.27 - - 12/20/2000 41.42 -none 74.2844.1 STEWART, DANIEL 118.66 67.06 51.60 - - 12/20/2000 49.14 -none 42.3056.2 STINAR, ILENE 69.06 39.07 29.99 - - 11/22/2000 77.60 - 31.3414.1 STINGER, KAREN 61.03 - - 4.26 56.77 09/19/2000 36.38 -none 21.0152.2 STODDARD, NORMAN 110.91 68.06 42.85 - - 12/06/2000 47.77 - 22.1432.2 STONE, KEITH & CLARA 84.10 37.70 46.40 - - 11/17/2000 34.18 - 21.2680.1 STRANGER, JAY 85.33 42.90 42.43 - - 12/14/2000 65.85 -none 19.0502.2 STUART, NEAL 103.69 58.16 45.53 - - 11/21!2000 45.53 - 21.1058.1 STUBBLEFIELD, MARK 122.82 65.60 57.22 - - 11/28/2000 170.00 -none 69.0646.1 SUDERMAN, MARK 120.98 74.72 46.26 - - 11/16/2000 163.94 -none 1.1410.1 SUMMERS, HEATHER 243.69 121.89 121.80 - - 11/27/2000 125.49 -none 31.3468.2 SUTTON III, DONALD 117.50 73.34 44.16 - - 11/27/2000 88.64 - 74.2346.1 SWEET, WILLIAM 34.09 - 6.48 27.61 - 10/12/2000 25.31 -none 69.1278.1 T C MILLER 71.76 34.58 37.18 - - 11/29/2000 120.96 -none 1.2290.3 TARANTINO, PAUL 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - 11/20/2000 34.18 - 21.1738.1 TATE, MICHAEL A. 108.45 60.54 47.91 - - 12/18/2000 60.21 -none 2.4960.1 TATMAN, CHRISTY 151.11 73.26 77.85 - - 11 /28/2000 76.62 -none '"' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent i_ r CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 19 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:50pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 50.1676.2 TAVARES,MARVIN 58.75 28.76 29.99 - - 11/28/2000 29.99- 50.1686.3 TAVARES, MARVIN 55.62 30.21 25.41 - - 12/20/2000 45.41 - 3.0418.1 TEAGUE, RON & JANET 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - 12/19/2000 34.18 -none 20.1964.1 TECO INVESTMENTS 74.00 45.24 28.76 - - 11/29/2000 55.14 -none 31.2314.2 TEIXEIRA, MICHELLE 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 12/22/2000 32.53 - 33.0056.1 TEL-CAR INC. 165.51 80.25 85.26 - - 12/21!2000 106.75 -none 34.0688.1 TEMPLIN, CLARISA 113.39 10.00 - 14.77 88.62 01/02/2001 14.77 -none 74.1114.1 THATCHER, TIMOTHY 221.52 51.70 45.39 57.85 66.58 10/20/2000 51.00 -none 69.0752.2 THE GREEN FAMILY TRUST 58.91 26.38 32.53 - - 11!17/2000 41.14 - 1.3490.1 THIEMANN, ERIC 143.48 55.56 37.73 50.19 - 11/27/2000 34.20 -none 2.0952.2 THOMAS, TIMOTHY 53.37 32.86 20.51 - - 11/28/2000 62.63 - 50.0350.1 THOMASSON, DAVID C 101.99 41.70 60.29 - - 11/22/2000 78.74 -none 32.1558.2 THOMPSON, GARY 89.74 48.04 41.70 - - 12/20/2000 41.70 - 32.0660.1 THOMPSON, JON & HAZEL 118.73 65.68 53.05 - - 11 /28/2000 46.90 -none 50.2110.2 THOMPSON, RHONDA 71.91 34.04 37.87 - - 11/27/2000 80.98 - 1.1950.1 THORNE, TORY 479.53 356.15 123.38 - - 11/28/2000 231.66 -none 1.1940.1 THORNE, TORY L 146.16 72.40 73.76 - - 11/28/2000 194.26 -none 21.2768.2 THURBER, RICHARD 95.73 54.25 41.48 - - 12/20/2000 76.76 - 19.4458.2 THURBER, RICK 91.90 50.42 41.48 - - 11/22/2000 39.02 - 21.2732.3 THURBER, RONALD 398.15 44.13 37.79 73.46 242.77 11/29/2000 200.00 - 50.1301.1 TIM MUSSELL 44.95 11.65 11.65 21.65 - 10/24/2000 235.91 - 69.0226.1 TIMA, KAREN 96.19 47.91 48.28 - - 12/21/2000 50.00 -none 46.0210.1 TODD, JEFF 100.53 64.25 36.28 - - 11/29/2000 66.49 -none 2.2200.3 TODD, RICK 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 12/20/2000 26.38 - 74.2520.1 TOLAND, DAVID 71.35 38.76 32.59 - - 12/01/2000 79.80 -none 35.5026.1 TOM CARPENTER 66.55 32.86 33.69 - - 11/16/2000 24.00 - 40.0250.1 TOMICH, LONNY 70.59 37.92 32.67 - - 12/20/2000 30.00 -none 34.0444.2 TOMISSER, CAROL 92.06 54.33 37.73 - - 11/20/2000 70.94 - 50.4022.2 TORGESON, MATTHEW 79.24 30.21 35.27 13.76 - 12/22/2000 50.00 - 42.1216.1 TOROK, ZSOLT 74.00 45.24 28.76 - - 11 /29/2000 77.90 -none 20.1492.1 TRAMPLEASURE, DENNIS 123.35 78.32 45.03 - - 12/04!2000 53.67 -none 14.5006.1 TURNER, DAVE 105.71 60.54 45.17 - - 12/19/2000 51.32 - 42.2348.3 TUTTLE, TAMMY 64.00 35.24 28.76 - - 11/27!2000 135.09 - 21.1174.1 TWADDLE, DAVID 96.96 47.68 49.28 - - 12/19/2000 59.12 -none 2.2714.1 TW EDE, ROGER 67.85 32.86. 34.99 - - 12/15/2000 49.75 -none 51.0302.4 TWOMEY,MATTHEW 70.68 34.04 36.64 - - 11/24/2000 90.82- 34.2104.1 TYLER, HEIDI 117.49 44.21 37.87 35.41 - 11/27/2000 59.10 -none 42.3138.1 ULRICH, NICHOLAS 67.83 35.24 32.59 - - 12/01/2000 31.36 -none 74.2876.1 USSERY, TRACY 134.00 63.23 60.77 10.00 - 12/20/2000 50.77 -none 51.2996.1 VALLA, CAROLYN 394.06 - - 10.00 384.06 07/11 /2000 24.08 -none 22.0192.2 VAN BLANKENSTEIN, IAN 70.55 39.07 31.48 - - 12/21/2000 40.00 - 68.0288.1 VAN GENDEREN, RICHARD 98.25 51.74 46.51 - - 12/11/2000 62.00 -none 22.1052.1 VANHORN, KEVIN & SANDRA 79.32 35.24 44.08 - - 11/24/2000 216.70 -none 1.1820.2 VANHOUTEN, MICHELLE 69.24 42.86 26.38 - - 11/29/2000 60.46 - 42.3968.1 VANHOUTEN, MIKE 64.00 35.24 28.76 - - 11/27/2000 26.30 -none 42.1998.1 VAUGHN, CHRISTOPHER 85.61 45.36 40.25 - - 11/17/2000 147.00 -none 31.0224.1 VAUGHN, RUDY R. 70.87 32.86 38.01 - - 11/22!2000 36.78 -none 21.1032.1 VELADA, FEDERICO 81.64 37.70 43.94 - - 12/15/2000 128.55 -none 2.0466.1 VICK, WILLIAM & KELLY 103.55 58.16 45.39 - - 12/04/2000 51.54 -none 4.2350.1 VIDEOLAND # 168 169.42 46.72 33.76 33.76 55.18 12/07/2000 33.76 -none 5.0696.1 VIGIL, THOMAS 266.15 197.28 31.36 37.51 - 11/03/2000 88.34 -none 19.0352.2 VILLARREAL,REYES 65.23 35.24 29.99 - - 11/27/2000 57.60- 7.1052.1 VINEGARD, JAMES 64.00 35.24 28.76 - - 11!27/2000 55.14 -none 50.3742.2 VNUK, JOHN 165.47 102.98 61.52 .97 - 01/01/2001 62.50 - 46.0262.1 VNUK, JOHN J 90.55 52.90 37.65 11/29/2000 71.69 -none "' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ., CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List-council Page: 20 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:51pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 Date Amount Msg 31.3556.1 VOGT, STELLA 112.90 65.74 47.16 - - 12/26/2000 90.00 -none 14.5007.1 VREELAND CO 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - 12/20/2000 33.28 - 19.0354.1 VREELAND CO 111.05 60.54 50.51 - - 12/21/2000 139.18 -none 43.2436.2 VREELAND CO 76.74 46.67 30.07 - - 12/05/2000 30.07 - 69.0654.1 WAGGAMAN, VAN & JULIA 84.19 40.25 43.94 - - 11/20/2000 57.47 -none 20.1618.1 WAGNILD, JON 70.15 35.24 34.91 - - 11/28/2000 54.59 -none 21.0124.1 WAGNON, DERICK 61.70 34.09 27.61 - - 11/24/2000 31.30 -none 21.2164.3 WAGONER, GLEN & MARY 202.42 79.77 122.65 - - 12/22/2000 100.00 - 33.4518.1 WALBRIDGE, RAYMOND 185.68 - - - 185.68 05/01/2000 151.93 -none 46.0122.1 WALCOM, MICHAEL 84.10 42.76 41.34 - - 11/27/2000 35.19 -none 21.0004.1 WALKER FAMILY TRUST 94.50 54.25 40.25 - - 11/27/2000 85.50 -none 1.2310.2 WALKER, BETTE 170.12 96.24 73.88 - - 12/20/2000 80.00 - 2.5730.2 WALKER, BRYCE 136.37 55.70 44.02 36.65 - 11/20/2000 70.00 - 20.1392.1 WALKER, DAVID 98.33 52.88 45.45 - - 11/22/2000 84.83 -none 74.2866.1 WALKER, GARY 69.01 36.42 32.59 - - 11/27/2000 33.82 -none 2.5180.1 WALKER, JERALDINE 60.47 32.86 27.61 - - 11/14/2000 34.99 -none 31.0608.1 WALKER, MICHAEL 97.40 53.10 44.30 - - 11/21/2000 102.29 -none 46.6002.1 WALMART 227.85 129.60 64.80 33.45 - - 21.0048.2 WALSH, DARREN 67.85 32.86 34.99 - - 11/17/2000 50.98 - 32.1306.2 WALSH, DAVID & CARA 91.36 45.36 39.02 6.98 - 01/03/2001 30.81 - 1.3340.1 WALSH, RON 165.69 - - - 165.69 10/15/1999 191.33 - ***none 4.2132.1 WALSTON, DOUGLAS 146.50 35.24 32.45 60.74 18.07 01/04/2001 40.00 -none 4.0684.2 WALTHER, REES 71.52 40.30 31.22 - - 11/20/2000 28.76 - 50.2178.2 WARD, LEE 70.54 37.87 32.67 - - 12!14/2000 31.60 - 32.0826.1 WARDLE, DAVID B. 121.58 61.99 59.59 - - 11/27/2000 36.05 -none 33.3648.2 WARDLE, JOHN 166.48 63.24 37.87 65.37 - 11/29/2000 112.00 - 32.0662.1 WARE, RANDY & BETH 143.61 82.65 60.96 - - 12/07/2000 41.28 -none 22.1594.1 WASDEN, NICHOLAS 86.91 52.88 33.68 .35 - .11/27/2000 88.00 -none 69.0774.1 WASHBURN, WILLIAM 57.52 28.76 28.76 - - 12/04/2000 42.29 -none 19.0320.1 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK 85.62 32.86 26.38 26.38 - 10/23/2000 24.08 -none 21.2714.1 WATERMAN, LORI 125.97 78.20 47.77 - - 12/20/2000 49.15 -none 19.4470.2 WATLINGTON, JUSTIN 62.41 35.24 27.17 - - 07/12/2000 74.51 - 31.3388.1 WATSON, COREY S 86.05 46.81 39.24 - - 11/27/2000 104.47 -none 74.3052.1 WATSON, JASON 93.08 47.91 45.17 - - 12/22/2000 62.39 -none 31.2230.1 WATTERS, TAMI 70.29 41.53 28.76 - - 12/20/2000 38.76 -none 69.0446.1 WATTS, DARIK 104.71 51.74 52.97 - - 12/20/2000 50.51 -none 19.0224.3 WAYNE SWANSON HOMES 79.48 40.52 38.96 - - 11!28/2000 122.44 - 65.0238.1 WEBER, LESLIE 80.55 46.59 33.96 - - 12/07/2000 36.42 -none 69.0098.2 WECKER,ELDON 75.60 37.87 37.73 - - 11/24/2000 64.55- 33.4266.1 WEEK, NORMAN 130.36 72.11 58.25 - - 12/21/2000 53.33-none 22.1466.1 WELCH, RODNEY 82.87 47.82 35.05 - - 11/29/2000 80.00 -none 21.1968.3 WELDIN, TAMMY R 110.83 50.30 36.56 23.97 - 12/01/2000 48.00 - 2.3150.3 W ELKER, ROGER 84.54 44.21 40.33 - - 12/20/2000 98.30 - 5.0392.1 WELLMAN, LORIN 90.70 46.81 43.88 .01 - 12/04/2000 73.40 -none 3.9869.1 WENDELL & KASHA LAWRENCE 437.96 10.00 58.32 159.04 210.60 10/30/2000 383.94 - 3.9868.1 WENDELL & KASHA LAWRENCE 290.76 169.14 121.62 - - 10/30/2000 202.46 - 4.2240.1 W ERRIES, DARRELL 89.97 39.07 50.90 - - 11!20/2000 85.34 -none 51.3098.3 WERRY, GREYSON 124.36 85.44 33.52 5.40 - 12/04/2000 60.00 - 51.1144.1 WES WORCESTER 44.31 16.88 11.33 6.48 9.62 - 53.0502.1 W ESCO 340.56 155.89 184.67 - - 12/05/2000 155.89 -none 22.1038.2 WESCOTT, SUSAN 64.95 34.09 30.86 - - 12!20/2000 44.83 - 4.1328.1 WESTROCK HOMES 74.46 32.86 28.64 6.48 6.48 - 22.2086.1 WESTROCK HOMES 45.03 12.96 12.63 6.48 12.96 - 43.0054.1 WESTROCK HOMES 44.18 - - 44.18 - 12/14!2000 63.76 - 22.1216.1 WHEILER, ROBERT 88.67 48.04 40.63 12/19/2000 50.00 -none **' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ~ i CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 21 Standard Payment Customers Jan 16,2001 03:51 pm Current Period: 01/31/2001 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 11/30/2000 10/31/2000 09/30!2000 Date Amount Msg 4.1950.1 WHITE, EDWARD 83.96 35.24 48.72 - - 12/20/2000 94.23-none 32.0846.1 WHITE, LUCILLE 71.82 42.98 28.84 - - 11/21/2000 41.14 -none 4.0922.1 WHITING, BRENT & LYNETTE 96.96 50.42 46.54 - - 12/20/2000 47.77 -none 50.0194.1 WHITNEY,CLAYNE 50.14 26.38 23.76 - - 11/21/2000 30.00-none 5.0792.1 WICK, DON 137.72 70.66 67.06 - - 12!21/2000 97.81 -none 33.2392.1 WIDMAN, WENDY 96.31 42.98 53.33 - - 12/04/2000 63.17 -none 21.1158.2 WIEBER, DONNA 71.81 35.24 36.56 .01 - 12/11/2000 55.00 - 68.0266.1 WIEMERS, KIP & COLLETTE 62.72 32.59 30.13 - - 12/12/2000 32.59 -none 52.0262.1 WILD SHAMROCK LLP 936.54 312.18 312.18 312.18 - 12/06/2000 259.07 -none 51.4230.1 WILLIAMS, ELIZABETH 105.26 42.92 61.42 .92 - 12/22/2000 42.00 -none 31.2274.2 WILLIAMS,FAYE 71.80 35.24 36.56 - - 11/24!2000 37.79- 2.2040.1 WILLIAMS, FRED 81.96 44.09 37.87 - - 11/30/2000 89.43-none 20.1660.3 WILLIAMS, MIKE 90.97 51.87 39.10 - - 12/11/2000 74.67- 22.1354.1 WILLIAMS, TERRI 308.32 103.48 99.88 104.96 - 12/13/2000 118.41 -none 2.1550.2 WILLS, BENJAMIN 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - 11/22/2000 66.06- 21.2722.1 WILSON, JIMMY & TANA 69.06 39.07 29.99 - - 11/28/2000 62.52 -none 4.0896.1 WITHERELL, ROBERT 59.24 32.86 26.38 - - 11!22/2000 50.46 -none 50.1666.1 WOLFE, NELLIE 26.38 - 26.38 - - 11/17/2000 26.38 -none 2.5020.1 WOOD, KENNETH 120.38 67.05 53.33 - - 11/27/2000 149.87 -none 35.1230.2 WOODARD, WADE 78.25 41.61 36.64 - - 11/27/2000 34.18- 13.2072.1 WOODHOUSE,PETER 81.64 46.59 35.05 - - 11/17/2000 61.78-none 31.3344.1 WOODRUFF, NOEL R 179.51 69.09 51.52 58.90 - 11/29/2000 99.49 -none 22.2188.2 WOOTEN, TOMAS & DENA 80.00 34.09 28.84 17.07 - 11/21/2000 50.00 - 22.1622.2 WRIGHT, DONALD 90.67 49.19 41.48 - - 12/22/2000 50.09 - 50.1352.1 WURTZ, DAVID R. 52.76 26.38 26.38 - - 11/16/2000 26.38 -none 33.2382.5 YAMAMOTO, KRISTINE 107.37 39.01 34.18 34.18 - - 74.3348.2 YEATTS, PAMELA 94.62 36.42 31.22 26.98 - 11/27/2000 30.00 - 22.0814.1 YELVERTON, MARC 123.29 97.47 25.82 - - 01!10/2001 82:38 -none 19.7146.1 YOUNG, GEORGE 82.08 46.81 35.27 - - 11/28/2000 34.04 -none 20.1508.1 ZELLER, CORI 118.71 59.31 59.40 - - 12/20/2000 55.71 -none 31.0718.2 ZIAR, RON 67.04 32.86 34.18 - - 11/17/2000 35.41 - 31.0658.2 ZIMMERMAN, RONALD 59.52 39.01 20.51 - - - Gran d Totals: 148,216.75 65,963.78 56,093.17 16,454.24 9,705.56 Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer.Cust No = {<} 9900000 "' in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent I ~~ _ I O ^ Q ~ P X04 a ~° ~ ~ -- ~ ~ c ~~ ~ ~ ~ w F- W W Z ~ aZ o~ Z _~ ~_ w~ ~~ u. ? O °~ Q ~w ~~ (> U J m 0 Ha Q O z 0 a ~~ w IQ ~~ II Q ~ ~ \~J J~ ~ j~ z C7 z Z' _~ ~w w ~, W Q C I~W t ~~` ~~ ~~ 1, ~" V ~,.~ ~_ • • Q o A o ~ N fTl (~ 2 ~ a o ~~ z a 0 W LL F- U ~" W W Z rZ V ~t~ C~ Z a W U J to W !- a 0 ~I ,~ ~i Z ~~ W, 0 ~ ~ ° ~ a ~o v W O f la z ~ v a W ~o 0 Q ~ I I ~ 2 ~~ ~- . -~ ~ -~ ~ a ~ I ~ w ~ w k., I I I i I ~ I ~ I I ~ I I I I I