HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindingsMERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: SEPTEMBER 16,1996
APPLICANT: CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CO. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 9
REQUEST; PUBLIC HEARING• CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A JOHN DEERE DEALERSHIP
AGEN Y
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
COMMENTS
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
"REVIEWED"
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
SEE ATTACHED COMMENT~~
/1V ~ v
X~ ~
71 r
l
All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
• •
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: OCTOBER 8.1996
APPLICANT: CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:~_
REQUEST; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FdR
A JOHN DEERE DEALERSHIP
AGE C
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
COMMENTS
~~L
~~~ ~~
Y~J~
a`~~ roc°~ C~
~ C~
~~ss --h~
OTHER:
All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
•
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CONTRACTORS E UIPMENT SUPPLY COMPANY (CESCO)
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT 1, BLOCK 1, PLAYGROUND SUBDIVISION
EAST OF LOCUST GROVE ON OVERLAND ROAD
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The above entitled conditional use permit application having
come on for consideration on September 16, 1996, at the hour of
7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East
Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, the Applicant's representative, Mark
Canfield, appearing and the Planning and Zoning Commission having
heard and taken oral and written testimony and having duly
considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the
following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That a notice of a public hearing on the Conditional Use
Permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the
said public hearing scheduled for September 16, 1996, the first
publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing;
that the matter was duly considered at the September 16, 1996,
hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express
comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were
available to newspaper, radio and television stations.
2. That the property is located within the City of Meridian
and is currently used as The Playground on East Overland Road;
there is exposure to the Interstate; and the property described in
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 1
•
the application which description is incorporated herein; that the
land is in a Mixed/Planned Use Development area as set forth in the
Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
3. That the property is currently zoned C-G, General Retail
and Service Commercial.
4. That the zoning of General Retail and Service Commercial,
(C-G) is defined in the Zoning Ordinance at 11-2-408 B. 11. as
follows:
fC-G) General Retail and Service Commercial: The purpose of
the (C-G) District is to provide for commercial uses which are
customarily operated entirely or almost entirely within a
building; to provide for a review of the impact of proposed
commercial uses which are auto and service oriented and are
located in close proximity to major highway or arterial
streets; to fulfill the need of travel-related services as
well as retail sales for the transient and permanent motoring
public. All such districts shall be connected to the
Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian, and
shall not constitute strip commercial development and
encourage clustering of commercial development;
5. That the Applicant is the owner of record of the property
and has requested this Conditional Use Permit and the Application
is not at the request of the City of Meridian.
6. That the property is currently being used as a golf
driving range open for business form 8:00 until 10:00 p.m., seven
days per week.
7. That the proposed use by the Applicant is to develop the
property for a John Deere Dealership, providing sales, service, and
parts for John Deere products; that the 10 acre site will house a
24,000 square foot commercial building; that the current number of
employees at its present location in Boise is approximately 25;
that the business hours will be from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, but the Applicant's representative .stated there may
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 2
•
be possible occasional longer hours from 6:00 a.m. to no later than
7:00 p.m.
8. Applicant states that the same type of development is in
the area with Western States Caterpillar, Arnold Equipment, and
Meridian Ford located to the west of the proposed development and
Transport Truck & Trailer proposing to develop to the east.
9. That the City Planning Director, Shari Stiles and the
Assistant to the City Engineer, Bruce Freckleton, submitted
comments and they are as follows:
1. That any existing irrigation/drainage ditches
crossing the property to be included in this
project shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605
M. Plans will need to be approved by the
appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or
lateral users association, with written
confirmation of said approval submitted to the
public Works Department.
2. That any existing domestic wells and/or septic
systems with this project shall be removed from
their domestic service per City Ordinance, except
that wells may be used for non-domestic purposes
such as landscape irrigation.
3. Determine the seasonal high groundwater elevation,
and submit a profile of the subsurface soil
conditions as prepared by a soil scientist with the
development plans.
4. Provide five foot (5') wide sidewalks in accordance
with City Ordinance Section 11-9-606.B. ACHD will
require deposit into their trust fund for future
sidewalk construction on Overland Road.
5. ~ Water service to this development is contingent
upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by
our computer model.
6. Bonding will be secured by any uncompleted
improvements prior to temporary Certificate of
Occupancy being secured.
7. Coordinate fire access and hydrant locations in
accordance with the City of Meridian's Water
Superintendent and Meridian Fire Department
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 3
• •
policies. Fire hydrant locations shall be depicted
on building plans.
8. Handicap parking, associated signage and building
construction shall meet the requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act.
9. That the Applicant respond in writing to each of
the comments, both General and Site Specific, and
submit to the City Clerk's Office prior to the
scheduled hearing.
10. That Bruce Freckleton and Shari Stiles submitted site
specific comments and they are as follows:
1. Utility locations need to be included on the plan
for approval by the Public Works Department.
2. Sanitary sewer service for this project doesn't
exist at this time. Sewer service to this site
shall be directed to the future Five Mile Creek
Sewer trunk line extension. A sanitary restriction
was placed on this lot during the platting process
for The Playground Subdivision. A sewer service
was temporarily installed for the small temporary
building used as a part of the driving range. The
Applicant has indicated a desire to temporarily
sewer to this existing service, if physically
possible. An easement from the adjacent property
owner would need to be secured for this purpose.
CESCO has verbally indicated they will pay their
proportionate share for the proposed Five Mile
Trunk Extension, as this parcel is included in that
sewer drainage area in the City's Facilities and
Comprehensive Plans. Details for this arrangement
will need to be addressed in the development
agreement, the recording of which must take place
prior to issuance of a building permit. The
treatment capacity of the Meridian Wastewater
Treatment Plant is currently being evaluated.
Approval of this application needs to be contingent
upon our ability to accept the additional sanitary
• sewage generated by this proposed development.
3. Water service for this development shall be off of
an extension of the existing 12" diameter main in
Overland Road. The main must be extended to the
eastern most property boundary line. The
Applicant's engineer is to coordinate routing with
the Meridian Public Works Department. Water lines
shall be located on the north side of roadway
centerline.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 4
4. Provide parking lot lighting plans to the Meridian
Public Works Department. Illumination of the site
shall be designed to not cause glare or adversely
impact neighboring residential properties as
determined by the City of Meridian.
5. A development agreement was required as a condition
of annexation. Although sales lots are a permitted
use in the C-G zone, the annexation of The
Playground was conditional and required a
development agreement. CESCO has submitted this
application to comply with the City's request and
to permit amendment of the development agreement
entered into between the City of Meridian and
Michael and Sue Clark. Creation of an additional
development agreement may be needed for this
parcel's use if it cannot be amended through the
existing document.
6. All landscaping is to meet the requirements of
Ordinance Section 11-2-414.D.2. The landscaping
proposed appears to exceed these requirements.
Trees along Overland Road shall be three-inch (3")
caliper minimum. The landscaping plan shown is not
to be changed from that shown without written
approval of the Planning & Zoning Department.
Detailed landscape plans will be reviewed during
the building permit approval process. A minimum 35
foot landscape setback is required on Overland Road
and Interstate I-84.
7. All signs must meet the requirements of the Uniform
Sign Code and Meridian City Ordinance. Flashing
signs will not be permitted. All signs are subject
to review and approval of the Planning and Zoning
Department.
8. ACHD has approved a driveway access 9' from the
eastern boundary of this parcel,. with a cross
access agreement required to the adjacent property
(site proposed by Transport Truck and Trailer).
9. Screened trash enclosures are to be provided in
accordance with City Ordinance. Coordinate
dumpster site locations with the City's solid waste
contractor, Sanitary Services, Inc. Locate
dumpsters so as not to impede fire access.
10. The area shown as parking on the eastern boundary
shall be paved; all off-street parking spaces are
to be paved and striped in accordance with Meridian
City Ordinance Section 11-2-414. Sixty-six (66)
parking spaces are provided (1:364 s.f.). This
would appear to meet Ordinance requirements,
depending on actual floor plan.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 5
•
11. Application states hours of operation are to be
from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
12. Any expansion of operation/ownership change shall
be subject to Council review.
11. That the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District, City
Fire Department, City Police Department, Ada County Highway
District, and Central District Health Department submitted comments
and they are incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
12. That the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District submitted
comments; that the Cook Lateral courses along the south boundary of
this project; that the right-of-way of the Lateral is 30 feet; 15
from the center facing downstream; that the developer must contact
the District for approval before any encroachment or change of
right-of-way occurs; that the District requires a Land Use
Change/Site Development application be filed for review prior to
final platting; that all laterals and waste ways must be protected;
that all municipal surface drainage must be retained on site and if
any surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa and Meridian Irrigation
District must review drainage plans; that the developer must comply
with Idaho Code 31-3805 and that it is recommended that irrigation
water be made available to all developments within the Nampa and
Meridian Irrigation District.
13. That the Ada County Highway District submitted comments
in regards to John Deere, Bill Howell and Sundance Subdivision and
access to Overland Road east of Locust Grove Road; that a joint
solution to the multiple driveways on Overland Road maintaining the
District's required 230 foot separation between driveways based on
a 45 mph speed limit is necessary; that Mr. Howell has agreed to
relinquish the approved driveways associated with his project of
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 6
the Transport Truck & Trailer with the approval of the following
driveways from east to west:
Howell parcel:
1. A 40 foot wide driveway 560 feet east of the site's
west boundary.
2. A future driveway- located 230 feet from both
driveway # 1 and driveway # 3 ( a range of approximately 10 0
feet).
John Deere parcel:
3. A 40 foot wide driveway, located 9 feet west of the
site's east boundary with a cross access easement to the
Howell parcel.
Sundance parcel:
4. A future driveway located 230 feet from both
driveway #3 and an existing driveway to Lot 2 of the
Playground Subdivision (a range of approximately 110
feet).
The Sundance parcel has the choice of additional driveways or
streets (total of 3 maximum) that may either align with driveways
#1, #2, or #3, or be offset 230 feet to the east of driveway #1
(assuming no additional conflicting driveways).
14. That the Applicant's counsel, John McCreedy, has
submitted written response to the staff comments of the Assistant
to the City Engineer, Bruce Freckleton and Planning Director, Shari
Stiles, and they are incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
15. That the Applicant, Mark Canfield, testified that John
Deere is an industrial equipment dealer which is currently located
by the Boise City Airport; that the airport is expanding the north
runway operation and has forced John Deere into making a move; that
property, formally known as The Playground, the driving range
portion, has been purchased and was recently replatted; that the
Applicant proposes building a 24,000 square foot facility on
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 7
approximately 10 acres within that site that will service for
selling parts and working on the equipment that is sold; that the
front portion of the building is office space and there are
approximately 66 parking spaces; that currently approximately 28
employees are employed .with the anticipation of approximately 30
plus people more; that there will be landscaping along the Overland
Road route and on this project's east and west borders; that there
will be a display berm similar to that of Western States and Arnold
Machinery along I-84 and the north border; that the hours of
operation will be Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and
that during busier construction seasons the hours of operation may
need to be extended from 6:00 a.m. to no later than 7:00 p.m.
16. That legal counsel for the Applicant, John McCreedy,
testified; that the Applicant has been at the Boise facility since
1955; that it is a very stable company and a very stable business;
that Mr. McCreedy wished to modify his earlier response to the
staff comments; that since the Ada County Highway District is
planning, in the future, to expand Overland Road and it therefore
be a waste of money to the the Cook Lateral to have it later
ripped out for expansion of Overland Road; that the Applicant is
willing to the the Lateral unless the City and the Nampa and
Meridian Irrigation District agree otherwise; that in a discussion
with John Anderson at the District, he preliminarily indicated that
it would be a waste of money to the the Lateral; that the
requirement of determining the seasonal ground water, high ground
water and subsurface soils will be complied with; that having the
facility open from 6:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. would be on an as needed
basis only; that this project is harmonious with the general
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 8
~ r
vicinity and fairly compatible; that the bright lights from the
driving range will be removed; that the comments submitted by the
Ada County Highway District (ACRD) will be complied with; that ACRD
has worked with the Applicant to expand the radiuses from the
traditional 15 degrees to 25 degrees to accommodate swing turns for
longer semi-trucks and granted the maximum driveway width to 40
feet; that there will be a low profile sign in the area of the
driveway on the Overland Road side of the property; that along I-84
another sign is anticipated similar to that of Western States and
Arnold Machinery; that the display sign would be an elevated sign
in the area of the berm and meet City Ordinances with regard to
height and lighting; that the building will be single story with
approximately 20 to 24 foot high ceilings in the area of the parts
warehouse and shop; that the back half of the facility, the
northern portion toward I-84, will be fenced and the trash areas
screened.
17. Meridian City Engineer Gary Smith testified that there is
a sewer that was extended through the RV overnight park but how far
east it goes from the RV park and whether it was extended through
Lot 2 is unknown; that it is not certain whether it was completed
and that the construction was not inspected by the City; that the
City doesn't know how deep it is or if it is physically possible to
sewer into this lot or not; that when requested by Dr. Clark to
write a letter concerning sewer service to Lot 1, Mr. Smith stated
that sewer service was available to Lot 1 as pertains to a support
facility building for the driving range; that at the time the plat
was recorded, sanitary restrictions were placed on the plat by
Central District Health Department concerning construction on Lot
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 9
1 and that the restrictions may or may not have been lifted off of
that plat; that the concern is, and has always been, that once you
start getting sewage from an adjacent drainage area into a drainage
area that was not intended to accept that sewage, there exists the
possibility of problems in the future for capacity in the sewer
line to serve an area that is outside of the drainage area for the
specific sewer line; that the City does not have a time table for
extension of the Five Mile Creek sewer line under the Interstate;
that the need for the Applicant to provide high water, high ground
water elevation, and profiling of subsurface soil condition on this
site was because of problems with water in crawl spaces and under
foundations; that there is a clay layer in this area and the above
comment is a standard comment put on all reviews; that once in a
while, pockets of perched water tables are discovered that can
cause grief and the profiling is just a precaution.
18. In the Meridian Comprehensive Plan it is stated:
A. Franklin, Overland/I/84 Mixed Use Policies, Page 28
That in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan it is stated
under LAND USE, Mixed-Use Areas Adjacent to I-84,
Overland Road and Franklin Road, Page 28., as follows:
5.6 The development of a variety of compatible land
uses should be provided in specific plans and
proposals for future development.
5.8 Development in these areas should be based on
functional plans and proposals in order to ensure
. that the proposed uses conform to the Comprehensive
Plan policies and are compatible with the
surrounding neighborhoods.
5.10 Development should be conducted under Planned Unit
Development procedures and as conditional uses,
especially when two or more differing uses are
proposed. (Emphasis added.)
5.11 The character, site improvements, and type of
development should be harmonized with previously-
developed land in the area, and where located
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 10
i ~
adjacent to or near any existing residence or
residential area, shall be harmonized with
residential uses, and all reasonable efforts shall
be made to reduce the environmental impact on
residential areas, including noise and traffic
reduction.
5.12 Strip development within this mixed-use area is not
in compliance with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan a
5.13 Clustering of uses and controlled access points
along arterials and collector streets will be
required.
5.14U Because these areas are near I-84, Franklin and
Overland Roads, high-quality visual appearance is
essential. All development proposals in this area
and conditional use permitting procedures.
(Emphasis added.)
B.
5.15U The mixed-use area in the vicinity of the
Overland Road/Franklin Road/ Eagle Road/I-84
interchange is a priority development area.
Under TRANSPORTATION, Page 43
1. Existing Conditions
Overland Road is listed as a minor arterial.
C.
Under COMMUNITY DESIGN, at Page 72.
1. Entryway Corridors
d. Overland Road (North and South entrances).
2. Entrance Corridors Goal Statement - Promote,
encourage, develop and maintain aesthetically
pleasing approaches to the City of Meridian.
3. Policies, Page 73
a. 4.3U Use the Comprehensive Plan, subdivision
regulations, and zoning to discourage strip
development and encourage clustered, landscaped
business development on entrance corridors.
b. 4.4U Encourage landscaped setbacks for new
development on entrance corridors. The City shall
require, as a condition of development approval,
landscaping along all entrance corridors.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 11
• •
19. Section 11-9-605 G, PLANTING STRIPS AND RESERVE STRIPS,
of the Subdivision and Development Ordinance, states that planting
strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features
such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to
screen the view from residential properties and that such screening
shall be a minimum of twenty feet wide and shall not be part of the
normal street right-of-way or utility easement.
20. Commissioner MacCoy and Mr. McCreedy had discussion
regarding the signage, the size of the building and the screening
of the trash receptacles.
21. Mr. McCreedy added that John Deere, CESCO, wants to do
whatever it takes to satisfy the City's conditions.
22. There was no other public testimony given.
23. That proper notice has been given as required by law and
all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission have been
given and followed.
CONCLUSIONS
1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local
Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have
been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property
within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's
property.
2. That the City of Meridian has authority to grant
conditional uses pursuant to 67-6512, Idaho Code, and, pursuant to
11-2-418 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of
Meridian.
3. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan states that the
property would only be capable of being developed under the
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 12
i ~
conditional use permit process with design review to ensure
neighborhood compatibility; therefore a conditional use is .required
for development of the property, which is what the Applicant has
applied for in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance, which
requires a conditional use for a tractor sales lot and a repair
facility.
4. That since the Meridian Comprehensive Plan states that
the City shall require, as a condition of development approval,
landscaping along all entrance corridors and states that landscaped
setbacks for new development on entrance corridors are encouraged
and the Planning and Zoning Director and the Assistant to the City
Engineer stated that there should be a 35 foot landscaped set back
from Overland Road, the property shall have a 35 foot set back for
landscaping.
5. That 11-2-418 C of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of
the City of Meridian sets forth the standards under which the
Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council shall review
applications for Conditional Use Permits; that upon a review of
those requirements and a review of the facts presented and the
conditions of the area, the Planning and Zoning Commission
concludes as follows:
a. The use, would in fact, constitute a conditional use and
a conditional use permit is required by Ordinance.
b. The use should be harmonious with and in accordance with
the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
c. The use apparently would be designed and constructed, to
be harmonious in appearance with the intended character of the
general vicinity.
d. That the use would not be hazardous nor should it be
disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 13
~. •-
~- ~
e. The property does not have sufficient sewer service
available and provisions for Applicant, at its cost, to supply
the necessary sewer service must be worked out as a condition
of granting this conditional use permit; water service is
available but Applicant must put in sufficient lines to serve
the use. It is to be noted that the City does have sewer and
water late comers provisions that the Applicant may be
desirous of requesting. -
f. The use would not create excessive additional
requirements at public cost for public facilities and services
and the use would not be detrimental to the economic welfare
of the community, but Applicant must incur the cost of
installing any water, sewer, or other utilities.
g. The use would not involve a use, activity, process,
material, equipment or conditions of operation that would be
detrimental to person, property or the general welfare by
reason of excessive production of traffic or noise.
h. That sufficient parking for the property and the proposed
use will be required.
i. The development and uses will not result in the
destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of
major importance.
6. That since the Meridian Comprehensive Plan states under
LAND USE, Mixed-Use Areas Adjacent to I-84, Overland Road and
Franklin Road, at Page 28, in Sub-Sections 5.10 and 5.14U, that a)
development should be conducted under Planned Unit Development
procedures and as conditional uses, especially when two or more
differing uses are proposed, and b), all development proposals in
this area will be subject to development review guidelines and
conditional use permitting procedures, it is concluded that this
application for a conditional use should be granted, but that as
required and stated above in this paragraph it should be subject to
development review guidelines.
7. That the Applicant shall also be required to do the
following:
a. Meet the requirements placed on the property during its
annexation and zoning.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 14
• i
b. Meet the requirements of the development agreement that
was entered into by Applicant's predecessor in title.
c. Meet the requirements and comments of the City Engineer,
the Assistant to the City Engineer, and the Planning and
Zoning Administrator and submit a landscape plan to her
for approval.
d. Meet the Ordinances of the~City of Meridian, including
but not limited to, the Uniform Building Code, Uniform
Fire Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Electrical
Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, the Fire and Life Safety
Code, all parking and landscaping requirements.
e. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Ada County
Highway District, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District,
Central District Health Department, City Fire and Police
Departments.
f. Meet all of the representations. of the Applicant unless
they are in conflict with the above requirements or City
Ordinances.
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Meridian Planning and~Zoning Commission hereby adopts and
approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONER BORUP
COMMISSIONER OSLUND
COMMISSIONER SHEARER
COMMISSIONER MacCOY
CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER)
VOTED G ~~
VOTED /~t~~.'~~'-1~ ~ ~
VOTED ~ ~~ ~`-
VOTED i~
VOTED L
~~~ J
~~
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 15
r:
DECISION AND RECOI~IENDATION
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends
to the Meridian City Council that they approve the Conditional Use
Permit requested by the Applicant for the property described in the
application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law, specifically resolving sufficient sewer and
water service for all of Applicant's land included in this
Application.
MOTION:
APPROVED, ~ ~~"/ DENIED
.~. ~, j
h~l% I
~~~' ~
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - CESCO PAGE 16
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 15 1996
APPLICANT: CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CO. ITEM NUMBER; 13
REQUEST• CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A JOHN DEERE DEALERSHIP
AGE CY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
COMMENTS
P 8~ Z MINUTES FOR 9-16-96
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
"REVIEWED"
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS f
G
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ~'
.gg ~l,
~U~
OTHER:
All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT SUPPLY COMPANY (CESCO)_
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT 1, BLOCdC 1. PLAYGROUND SUBDIVISION
EAST OF LOCUST GROVE ON OVERLAND ROAD
MERIDIAN, IDRHO
pltA/T
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAVi
The above entitled conditional use permit applicata.on was
heard by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission on September
16, 1996, at the hour of 7.:30 o'clock p.m. on said date and the
Commission adopted and approved Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law at the Commission's meeting on October 8, 1996, the Application
came on fir consideration before the Meridian City Council on
October 15, 1996, without a public hearing as allowed by 11-2-418
E., at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian,
Idaho, the Applicant's representative, John McCreedy, appearing,
and the City Council having considered the Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the
comments of the ,Applicant's representative, and the matter, the
Meridian City Council makes the following Amended Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The City Council hereby adopts and approves of the
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission's Findings of Fact and
incorporates. them herein; that any statements, findings,
conclusions, or recommendations made herein that are in conflict
~nrith the Meridian Planning and Zoning Findings of .Fact shall
overrule the actions of the Commission.
2. The City Council hereby finds that Applicant's
representative, John McCreedy, stated and represented, among other
things, that the Development Agreement that was entered into
between the City and Mr. & Mrs. Clarke needs to be amended; that he
has sent a proposed amendment of the Development Agreement to the
Meridian City Attorney; that the driving range lights would be
removed, that the sign for Cesco would be constructed as shown and
be low voltage; that with regard to the sewer there is an easement,
that the sewer can be enlarged and their engineer states that there
is plenty of capacity, that the land was platted all as one
subdivision, that their only desire was to connect to sewer
temporarily and that they would help financially to extend the Five
Mile Sewer Extension and would pay their fair share.
That Mr. McCreedy stated that had facsimiled a letter to the
Planning and Zoning Administrator on the day of the City Council
meeting, October 15, 1996; he stated that Page 4 of the Findings of
Fact, referring to Finding of Fact 10., subparagraph 2., needed to
be changed to reflect that the property does have sufficient sewer
service available on a temporary basis to serve the use of CESCO
according to CESCO's engineer and that Finding No. 17, regarding
the City Engineer's statement that he did not know if the sewer
line that .ran to this property could sewer the property or not, and
that the City did not have a time table for extension of the Five
Mile Creek Sewer-Line. Mr. McCreedy stated that a temporary sewer
connection was needed and that Conclusion No. 5. e., should be
changed because it stated that the property does not have
sufficient sewer service available and that. the Applicant must
provide the sewer service at its cost as a condition of granting
the conditional use. He additionally stated that the Applicant
does not want to have to pay for all of the Five Mile Sewer
extension and that in Conclusion No. 7 . b. , he would put, "Meet the
requirements of an amended development agreement.", because CESCO
cannot comply with the existing development agreement that the
Clarke's entered into.
After the referenced in the paragraph below, Mr. McCreedy
stated that he would prepare the money numbers and that Applicant
desired to temporarily connect to the Bawer for three to five
years. That during Mr. McCreedy's last statement, a representative
of the Applicant stated that CESCO would commit to assist in
financing the Five Mile Sewer project.
3. That the City Engineer commented, in response to an
inquiry from Councilman Glenn Bentley, that the Clarke's had asked
for a letter for sewer to the driving range and he said that they
could provide sewer to the driving range and the concession stand,
but that he had not told them that there was enough capacity to
serve the business; he additionally commented that land on the west
of the Hunter Lateral goes to Nine Mile Sewer and land on the east
goes to Five Mile Sewer; he also said that land could be taken out
of participating in the Five Mile Sewer; that it was a policy of
the City that sewage in a drainage should be served by the sewer
line serving that drainage and should not be taken out of the line
serving-the drainage.-
r-
CONCLUSIONS
1. The City Council hereby adopts and approves of the
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission's Conclusion of Law and
incorporates them herein; that any statements,. conclusions, or
recommendations made herein that are in conflict with the Meridian
Planning and Zoning Conclusions of Law shall overrule the actions
of the Commission.
2. That since the Meridian Comprehensive Plan states under
LAND- USE, Mixed-Use Areas Adjacent to I-84, Overland Road and
Franklin Road, at Page 28, in Sub-Sections 5.10 and 5.14U, that a)
development should be conducted under Planned Unit Development
procedures and as conditional uses, and b), all development
proposals in this area will be subject to development review
guidelines and conditional use permitting procedures, it is
concluded that this application for a conditional use should be
granted, but that as required and stated above in this paragraph it
should be subject to development review guidelines.
3. That the Applicant shall also be required to do, and
perform, the following:
a. Meet the requirements, all at Applicant's. cost and
expense, placed on the property during its annexation and
zoning, except those which pertained to operating and
maintaining a golf driving range or related thereto,
which will be determined by the City.
b. Meet the requirements of the development agreement that
was entered into by Applicant's predecessor in title,
except those which pertained to operating and maintaining
a golf driving range or related thereto, which will be
determined by the City, all at Applicant's cost and
expense.
c. Meet the requirements and comments of the City Engineer,
the Assistant to the City Engineer, and the Planning and
Zoning Administrator, all at Applicant's cost and
DECISION
C~
The. Meridian .City ~ouncil of the City of Meridian hereby
decides. that the Conditional Use Permit for the property set forth
in the application should be approved under the conditions set
forth in these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and those of
the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission; that if the Applicant
is not agreeable with these Findings of Fact and Conclusions and
those of the Commission and is not agreeable with entering into a
nsw or amended development agreements ±he Conditional Use Permit
shall not be approved.
MOTIOPi s
APPROVED: DISAPPROVED:
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING• (~ ~Y~''`' ~ ~/' / ~ ~~
APPLICANT: ~' ~~
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANN~iG DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
~~
Q5 ~`
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS dRRIGATION:
IDAHO 'POWEI!t:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
C,- ~ J ~-
GA ENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
• •
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT SUPPLY COMPANY (CESCOL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT 1, BLOCR 1. PLAYGROUND SUBDIVISION
EAST OF LOCUST GROVE ON OVERLAND ROAD
MERIDIAN. IDAHO
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The above entitled conditional use permit application was
heard by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission on September
16, 1996, at the hour of ? :30 o'clock p.m. on said date and the
Commission adopted and approved Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law at the Commission's meeting on October 8, 1996, the Application
came on for consideration before the Meridian CITY Council on
October 15, 1996, without a public hearing as allowed by 11-2-418
E., at the Meridian CITY Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian,
Idaho, the Applicant's representative, John McCreedy, appearing,
and the CITY Council having considered the Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the
comments of the Applicant's representative, and the matter, the
Meridian CITY Council makes the following Amended Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The CITY Council hereby adopts and approves of the
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission's Findings of Fact and
incorporates them herein; that any statements, findings,
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS - 1
•
conclusions, or recommendations ode herein that are in conflict
with the Meridian Planning and Zoning Findings of Fact shall
overrule the actions of the Commission.
2. The CITY Council hereby finds that Applicant's
representative, John McCreedy, stated and represented, among other
things, that the Development Agreement that was entered into
between the CITY and Mr. & Mrs. Clarke needs to be amended; that he
has sent a proposed amendment of the Development Agreement to the
Meridian CITY Attorney; that the driving range lights would be
removed, that the sign for Cesco would be constructed as shown and
be low voltage; that with regard to the sewer there is an easement,
that the sewer can be enlarged and their engineer, J. J. Howard,
states that there is plenty of sewer capacity, that the land was
platted all as one subdivision, that their only desire was to
connect to sewer temporarily and that they would help financially
to extend the Five Mile Sewer Extension and would pay their fair
share.
That Mr. McCreedy stated that he had facsimiled a letter to
the Planning and Zoning Administrator on the day of the CITY
Council meeting, October 15, 1996; he stated that Page 4 of the
Findings of Fact, referring {..o Finding of Fact 10 . , subparagraph
2 . , needed to be changed to reflect that the property does have
sufficient sewer service available on a temporary basis to serve
the use of CESCO according to CESCO's engineer and that Finding No.
17, regarding the CITY Engineer's statement that he did not know if
the sewer line that ran to this property could sewer the property
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS - 2
• •
or not, and that the CITY did not have a time table for extension
of the Five Mile Creek Seder Line. Mr. McCreedy stated that a
temporary sewer connection was needed and that Conclusion No. 5.
e., should be changed because it stated that the property does not
have sufficient sewer service available and that the Applicant must
provide the sewer service at its cost as a condition of granting
the conditional use. He additionally stated that the Applicant
does not want to have to pay for all of the Five Mile Sewer
extension and that in Conclusion No. 7. b., he would put, "Meet the
requirements of an amended development agreement.", because CESCO
cannot comply with the existing development agreement that the
Clarke's entered into.
After the reference in the paragraph below, Mr. McCreedy
stated that the Applicant desired to temporarily connect to the
sewer for three to five years; he stated that they were willing to
include in an amended development agreement a statement that they
will pay their fair share for the Five Mile Trunk Extension. That
during Mr. McCreedy's last statement, a representative of the
Applicant stated that CESCO would commit to assist in financing the
Five Mile Sewer project.
3. That the CITY Engineer commented, in response to ar:
inquiry from Councilman Glenn Bentley, that the Clarke's had asked
for a letter for sewer to the driving range and he said that they
could provide sewer to the driving range and the concession stand,
but that he had not told them that there was enough capacity to
serve the business; he additionally commented that land on the west
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS - 3
• •
of the Hunter Lateral goes to Nine Mile Sewer and land on the east
goes to Five Mile Sewer; he also said that land could be taken out
of participating in the Five Mile Sewer; that, it was a policy of
the CITY that sewage in a drainage should be served by the sewer
line serving that drainage and should not be taken out of the line
serving the drainage; he also stated that he did not doubt what Jim
Howard had said and that he did not doubt that there is capacity in
the line if it was extended.
CONCLUSION8
1. The CITY Council hereby adopts and approves of the
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission's Conclusion of Law and
incorporates them herein; that any statements, conclusions, or
recommendations made herein that are in conflict with the Meridian
Planning and Zoning Conclusions of Law shall overrule the actions
of the Commission.
2. That since the Meridian Comprehensive Plan states under
LAND USE, Mixed-Use Areas Adjacent to I-84, Overland Road and
Franklin Road, at Page 28, in Sub-Sections 5.10 and 5.14U, that a)
development should be conducted under Planned Unit Development
procedures and as conditional uses, and b), all deve~,opment
proposals in this area will be subject to development review
guidelines and conditional use permitting procedures, it is
concluded that this application for a conditional use should be
granted, but that as required and stated above in this paragraph,
it shall be subject to development review guidelines.
FINDINQrB OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS - 4
• •
3. That in addition to the Conclusions of Law adopted by the
Planning and Zoning Commission, the Applicant shall also be
required to do, and perform, the following:
a. Meet the requirements, all at Applicant's cost and
expense, placed on the property during its annexation and
zoning, except those which pertained to operating and
maintaining a golf driving range or related thereto,
which will be determined by the CITY.
b. Meet the requirements of the Development Agreement
that was entered into by Applicant's predecessor in title
except those which pertained to operating and maintaining
a golf driving range or related thereto, which will be
determined by the CITY, all at Applicant's cost and
expense.
c. Meet the requirements and comments of the CITY
Engineer, the Assistant to the CITY Engineer, and the
Planning and Zoning Administrator, all at Applicant's
cost and expense.
d. Meet all of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian,
including but not limited to, the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Fire Code, Uniform Fire and Life Safety Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Electrical Code, Uniform
Mechanical Code, all parking and landscaping
requirements, all at Applicant's cost and expense.
e. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Ada
County Highway District, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation
District, Central District Health Department, CITY Fire
and Police Departments, all at Applicant's cost and
expense.
f. Meet all of the representations of the Applicant
unless they are in conflict with the above requirements
or CITY Ordinances, all at Applicant's cost and expense.
g. Enter into the proposed Amended Development
Agreement that has been negotiated between the City, but
has not been adopted by the City, and the Applicant, or
a similar such agreement. The Agreement shall, when
adopted and passed :oy the City and upon execution by all
parties, be attached to these Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law.
The Development Agreement provides for many things,
which include that the Applicant shall be allowed to
temporarily connect to the existing Meridian sewer line
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLU3ION8 - 5
that exists on Lots 2 and 3 of the Playground
Subdivision, the temporary sewer connection will provide
sewer service for five (5) years from the date of
issuance of a building permit to Applicant for the
structure that Applicant proposes to construct on the
property,-the Applicant shall, individually, install and
construct the Five Mile Trunk Sewer Extension if
Applicant, and/or others, have not installed and
constructed it within five (5) years, that if the sewer
extension line is not constructed in five (5) years the
Applicant shall construct and install it, and that
Applicant shall be allowed to enter into a Late Comers
Agreement for repayment of the costs of installing and
constructing that sewer line. All construction costs for
installing and connecting to the Meridian Sewer shall be
at Applicant's cost and expense.
h. Enter into an amended Development Agreement with the
City.
i. Execute and deliver it to the City, if it is in
agreement with these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law, a statement that it is in agreement.
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Meridian CITY Council hereby adopts and approves these
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
ROLL CALL
COUNCILMAN MORROW VOTED
COUNCILMAN BENTLEY VOTED
COUNCILMAN ROUNTREE VOTED
COUNCILMAN TOLSMA VOTED
MAYOR CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED
DECISION
The Meridian CITY Council of the CITY of Meridian hereby
decides that the Conditional Use Permit for the property set forth
in the application should be approved under the conditions set
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS - 6
forth in these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and those of
the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission; that if the Applicant
is not agreeable with these Findings of Fact and Conclusions and
those of the Commission and is not agreeable with entering into a
new or amended development agreement, the Conditional Use Permit
shall not be approved.
MOTION:
APPROVED: ,, DISAPPROVED:
FINDIN(38 OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 7
•
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: November 19.1996
APPLICANT: CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CO. ITEM NUMBER; 4
REQUEST: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUEST FOR A JOHN DEERE DEALERSHIP
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE:
CENtRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
COMMENTS
L
'~ ~ C
J~
~~
" I ' ~ ~ ~
J~
~P~~~
OTHER:
All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Aril 1.1997
APPLICANT: ITEM NUMBER; 16
REQUEST: CESCO LATE COMERS AGREEMENT
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT: ~ J~/
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ~, J~
~~
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: (~
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
~IAM~A FtIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SET'~LERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
u
May 3, 20Q2
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 7, 2002
APPLICANT ITEM NO. S' -- .~
REQUEST Development Agreement: ~ -- 2000 E. Overland Road
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
~~
OTHER:
Contacted: Date: Phone:
Materials presented al public meetings shpq become properly of the City of Meridian.