Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutesMeridian City Council • • January 10, 2006 Page 21 of 59 Bird: Second. De Weerd: Okay. Motion to close the public hearings on 13 and 14. All those in favor say aye. Okay. All ayes. Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: If there is no further discussion, I would move that we would approve preliminary plat for Item 13, PP 05-054. Bird: Second. De Weerd: And that would be also to approve the revision made by staff? Rountree: That's in the Findings in the CUP. De Weerd: Okay. The motion is to approve Item 13. If there is no further discussion, Mr. Berg. Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Borton, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Thank you. Item 14. Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I move that we approve the Conditional Use Permit 05-050, including staff and public comments this evening and approval of the Findings of Facts as prepared. Bird: Second. De Weerd: Okay. Motion is to approve Item 14. Mr. Berg. Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Borton, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 15: Public Hearing: MI 05-016 Miscellaneous request to modify the recorded Development Agreement for Resolution Subdivision by removing Lot 7, Meridian City Council • • January 10, 2006 Page 22 of 59 Block 1, from the requirement to obtain a Conditional Use Permit prior to operation and construction of an office building by Conger Management Group - 2045 East Overland Road: De Weerd: Thank you. Item 15 is a Public Hearing MI 05-016. I will open this Public Hearing with staff comments. Canning: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. This is a request by Resolution Subdivision -- Resolution Subdivision to amend their development agreement. It's for the property in the brighter purple, located at the corner of Overland Road and the entrance road to the subdivision, approximately a quarter mile east of Locust Grove. This is a miscellaneous application for a development agreement modification. The applicant is requesting to remove the requirement from the development agreement for just these 2.5 acres and the condition that they are asking to have removed is the one that requires conditional use approval of -- before a CZC is issued on the site. Because the original approval was conceptual in nature, the city required that a Conditional Use Permit be approved on each lot prior to development. This was the standard requirement of the city at the time. We are trying to move away from those. This is the third lot that has asked to be exempt from that requirement within Resolution Subdivision. The applicant has submitted a conceptual site plan, but no elevations at this time. Some of the other requests you got both elevations and a site plan at the time that you were being asked to waive the requirement for the conditional use approval. What staff has recommended for this particular site is that they submit -- instead of having to go through the CU process, that they submit for design review and meet the standards for design review that are in Chapter 3, Article A, and those are largely geared toward large structures, but they are also geared for entryway structures. So, there are some design standards there. They are mostly geared toward breaking up mass, but we found that they work fairly well at also breaking up landscaping and making sure that we don't have single block buildings, no matter what size. The staff is in support of the development agreement modification with that change, because we feel we could get enough staff review of it that it wouldn't need to go up to the Planning Commission for their review of the elevations, essentially. Again, staff has some concern -- a little bit -- this is the final lot in Resolution Subdivision to be developed, but there is this outstanding conditional use requirement for any use that goes into it. So, even though all those structures have been built now, if there were a change in use, which one change in use might be going from an accountant office to a medical office that -- the zoning code actually treats those differently, because one is put under medical office -- kind of the larger medical use. So, technically, that would require a conditional use approval in the future. This is another one where staff would like some direction from Council, if you -- now that the project is built out, that there is an established look to it, would this be the appropriate time to remove the development agreement condition for this subdivision as a whole, to initiate that action with all those property owners. I leave that open for your consideration. It's not actually part of tonight's hearing, but I wanted to raise the issue, since you're now considering the last one in the development. And with that, I will answer any questions. You don't have Meridian City Council January 10, 2006 Page 23 of 59 Findings on this one, because it is a modification to the development agreement that will be done through the city attorney's office. De Weerd: Thank you, Anna. Any questions for staff from Council? Bird: I have none. De Weerd: Okay. Is the applicant here? If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. McKinnon: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. Dave McKinnon, 735 South Crosstimber. I have read Craig's report, agree with the recommendation. If you guys have any questions of me. De Weerd: That was short and sweet. Council, any questions -- Bird: I have none. De Weerd: -- for Dave? Rountree: I won't comment. McKinnon: Thank you. Sorry I missed the pledge tonight. De Weerd: You know, as a former staffer, we just like to give you a hard time. Okay. This is a Public Hearing. Is there anyone who would like to provide testimony on this item? Okay. Council? Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I move we close the Public Hearing on Item 15. Bird: Second. De Weerd: Okay. Motion to close the Public Hearing on Item 15. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Any discussion? Rountree: I have none. Wardle: Yes. Meridian City Council March 7, 2006 Page 4 of 60 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 6: Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of February 21, 2006 City Council Regular Meeting: B. Addendum to Development Agreement: MI 05-016 Miscellaneous request to modify the recorded Development Agreement for Resolution Subdivision by removing Lot 7, Block 1, from the requirement to obtain a Conditional Use Permit prior to operation and construction of an office building by Conger Management Group - 2045 East Overland Road: C. Contract for Additional Support Services for Existing Model Update with JUB Engineers, Inc.: D. Right of Way Agreement for the Ten Mile Division Trunk: E. Well No. 27 Flush Line Easement with Cherry Lane Christian Church: F. Award of Bid for Well No. 27 Flush Line to Star Construction, LLC: G. Blackrock Subdivision Memorandum of Understanding: H. Approve Bills: De Weerd: Item 6. Consent Agenda. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I would move that we approve the Consent Agenda and for the Mayor to sign and the clerk to attest on all proper papers. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: Okay. Motion is to approve the Consent Agenda. If there is no discussion, Mr. Berg, will you call roll. Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Wardle, yea; Borton, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.