Memo from Planning (2)Project: Selway (Continued from 11/27/07)
Summary: The appellant has requested City Council review of a Planning Commission decision
on a Conditional Use permit. Architectural materials, density, traffic and compatibility with the
surrounding residences seem to be the primary concerns of the appellant. This project was
continued from November 27~' so the Council could: 1) review revised elevations that show a
minimum stonework (accent) of 50 percent and greater modulation on the carriage units; 2), who
will be responsible for "No Parking" signs on Goddard Creek; 3) providing cross access
easement to property to the south; 4) a cross section showing the screening for the headlights on
the north boundary; 5) if the existing pathway to the north is not extended into the site, what is
the plan for the area where the pathway currently exists; and, 6) review the written minutes. The
hearing was continued and the appellant, applicant and public should be allowed an opportunity
to discuss only the items listed above.
Update:
1) The applicant has prepared revised elevations and will present those tonight.
2) ACRD Staff, Christy Richardson, submitted an e-mail requesting a condition be added,
stating: The Developer shall install NO PARKING signs on Goddard Creek Way from Wapoot
Way to the south, for a location to be determined by ACRD Traffic Services. The costs
associated with the signs and installation shall be the Developer's costs. There is some
associated roadway striping/pavement marking that needs to occur with the installation of the
signage. ACRD will pay for and conduct that work, but the Developer shall coordinate the
scheduling of the sign installation with Traffic Services so that the pavement marking work can
occur at the appropriate time.
3) Staff recommends that the Council add a condition to the CUP requiring cross access be
provided to the property to the south in two locations; one at the east property line, and one near
the southwest corner. This condition should read as follows: Prior to the issuance of the fourth
building permit, provide Planning Staff with a copy of a recorded cross-access/ingress-egress
easement to the property to the south. Said easement shall provide vehicular access to the
property to the south in the two locations shown on the site plan, to Goddard Creek Way.
4) The applicant has submitted a cross section showing screening to the north. The applicant will
present that tonight.
5) Staff contacted the appellant and believes they will have an update for the Council tonight on
what they plan to do with the existing pathway and common lot, should the pathway not be
extended south into the Selway development.
Written Testimony since last hearing: Letter from Dorothy Peffele, dated November 30~' & E-
mail, with attachments, from Al Wallace, dated December 14~'.
Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council:
Notes:
12/18/2007