HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-01-08 Special0 •
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AND
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING / WORKSHOP
AGENDA
Monday, January 8, 2007
at Noon
ACHD Auditorium, 3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho
City of Meridian:
David Zaremba
Charlie Rountree
ACHD:
Joe Borton
Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
Carol McKee Rebecca Arnold
Sherry Huber David Bivens
John Franden, President
Introduction of New City Council Member Mayor
& General Introductions
II. Update on Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan
(Friedman)
III. Update on ACHD's Five Year Work Program
IV. Status of Impact Fee Collections
V. Discussion of Revenue Increasing Options
VI. Discussion of Upcoming Legislative Issues
VII. Update on Locust Grove Roadway Project
Meridian
ACHD (Levihn)
ACHD (Brokaw)
Elected Officials
Elected Officials
ACHD
VIII. Update on Phase 1 of Split Corridor ACHD (Bledsoe)
(Two lanes of north bound traffic on Main from
Franklin to Pine with discussion of signals at Pine and Idaho)
IX. Other (time permitting)
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners — January 8, 2007 Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the City of Meridian and ACHD.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and / or hearings,
please contact the Administrative Office of ACHD at 387-6100 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AND
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING / WORKSHOP
AGENDA
Monday, January 8, 2007
at Noon
ACHD Auditorium, 3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho
City of Meridian:
David Zaremba
Charlie Rountree
ACRD:
Joe Borton
0 Keith Bird
_X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
_ Carol McKee _ Rebecca Arnold
Sherry Huber _� David Bivens
)e-�_ John Franden, President
I. Introduction of New City Council Member Mayor
& General Introductions
II. Update on Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan Meridian
(Friedman)
III. Update on ACHD's Five Year Work Program ACHD (Levihn)
IV. Status of Impact Fee Collections ACHD (Brokaw)
V. Discussion of Revenue Increasing Options Elected Officials
VI. Discussion of Upcoming Legislative Issues Elected Officials
VII. Update on Locust Grove Roadway Project ACHD
VIII. Update on Phase 1 of Split Corridor ACRD (Bledsoe)
(Two lanes of north bound traffic on Main from
Franklin to Pine with discussion of signals at Pine and Idaho)
IX. Other (time permitting)
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners — January 8, 2007 page 1 of 1
A# materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the City of Meridian and ACHD.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and /or hearings,
please contact the Administrative Office of ACHD at 387-8100 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
0 0 Page 1 of 1
Will Berg
From: Susan Slaughter [sslaughter@achd.ada.id.us]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 1:47 PM
To: Will Berg
Subject: Jt Meeting - Attendance
The following people were at today's meeting:
Commissioners Franden, Bivens, Arnold and McKee
J. Schweitzer — Director
Mike Brokaw — Deputy Director/Treasurer
Bruce Mills — Deputy Director
Katey Levihn — Deputy Director
Steve Price — General Counsel
Craig Quintana — Public Relations
Alissa Bassler — Attorney
Scott Spears — Attorney
Terry Little — Manager of Traffic Services
Gary Inselman — Manager of Right -of -Way & Development
Scott Lininger — Planner
Pat Heckmann — Budget Analyst
Lori Den Hartog — Planning Review Supervisor
Dale Kuperus — Construction Supervisor
Susan Slaughter — Board Secretary
I'll send a copy of the tape with our liaison
S.
1/8/2007
E
AGENDA
•
JOINT MEETING — CITY OF MERIDIAN/ACHD COMMISSION
January 8, 2007
12:00 p.m.
ACHD Auditorium
3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho
I Introduction of New City Councilman City of Meridian
II Update on Ten Mile Interchange Specific City of Meridian (Friedman)
Area Plan
III Update on ACHD's Five Year Work Program
IV Status of Impact Fee Collections
V Discussion — Revenue Increasing Options
VI Discussion — Upcoming Legislative Session
VII Other (time permitting)
ACHD (Levihn)
ACHD (Brokaw)
Elected Officials
Elected Officials
• • Page 1 of 1
Will Berg
From: Joe Borton Qwborton@foleyfreeman.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:55 PM
To: Will Berg
Cc: Tammy de Weerd
Subject: RE: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
How about "Locust Grove construction timeline/update"? a brief topic but worth mentioning. ACHD staff can tell
us the proposed timeline.
From: Will Berg [mailto:bergw@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:41 PM
To: Tammy de Weerd; Joe Borton; Keith Bird; Charlie Rountree; zarembad@meridiancity.org
Cc: canninga@meridiancity.org; Peter Friedman; watsonb@meridiancity.org; Len Grady;
musserb@meridiancity.org; Peggy Gardner; Shaun Wardle; Peggy Gardner
Subject: FW: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
Agenda from ACHD — any changes????
From: Susan Slaughter[mailto:sslaughter@achd.ada.id.us]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 11:03 AM
To: Will Berg
Subject: RE: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
Attached is a draft of the agenda for next Monday's joint meeting. Please let me know if there are any
changes/deletions or additions.
From: Will Berg [mailto:bergw@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 8:58 AM
To: Tammy de Weerd; Joe Borton; Keith Bird; Charlie Rountree
Cc: canninga@meridiancity.org; Matthew Ellsworth; Peter Friedman; watsonb@meridiancity.org; Len Grady;
musserb@meridiancity.org; Bob Stowe; John Overton - Police; Bill Nary; Peggy Gardner; Shaun Wardle
Subject: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
It is time for a joint meeting with ACHD. It is scheduled for Monday, January 8, 2007 at noon at ACRD. We need
some agenda items. Please get them to me by Friday. Thanks...... Will
Some items for discussion:
-- update on the Five Year Work Plan
— status on impact fee collection
1/2/2007
0 • Pagel of 2
Will Berg
From: Peter Friedman
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:53 PM
To: Will Berg
Cc: Anna Canning
Subject: RE: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
Will,
Looks fine to me. Anna will ask Council tonight if there is anything else they want to add
Thanks
Pete
Pete Friedman, AICP
Comprehensive Planning Manager
City of Meridian Planning Dept.
660 E. Watertower, Suite 202
Meridian, ID 83642
208.884.5533
From: Will Berg
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:41 PM
To: Tammy de Weerd; Joe Borton; Keith Bird; Charlie Rountree; zarembad@meridiancity.org
Cc: Anna Canning (canninga@meridiancity.org); Peter Friedman; Brad Watson (watsonb@meridiancity.org); Len
Grady; Bill Musser (musserb@meridiancity.org); Peggy Gardner; Shaun Wardle; Peggy Gardner
Subject: FW: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
Agenda from ACHD — any changes????
From: Susan Slaughter [mailto:sslaughter@achd.ada.id.us]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 11:03 AM
To: Will Berg
Subject: RE: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
Attached is a draft of the agenda for next Monday's joint meeting. Please let me know if there are any
changes/deletions or additions.
From: Will Berg [mailto:bergw@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 8:58 AM
To: Tammy de Weerd; Joe Borton; Keith Bird; Charlie Rountree
Cc: canninga@meridiancity.org; Matthew Ellsworth; Peter Friedman; watsonb@meridiancity.org; Len Grady;
musserb@meridiancity.org; Bob Stowe; John Overton - Police; Bill Nary; Peggy Gardner; Shaun Wardle
Subject: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
It is time for a joint meeting with ACHD. It is scheduled for Monday, January 8, 2007 at noon at ACHD. We need
some agenda items. Please get them to me by Friday. Thanks..... Will
Some items for discussion:
— update on the Five Year Work Plan
1/2/2007
0 0 Page 2 of 2
- status on impact fee collection
1/2/2007
0 •
Will Berg
From: Susan Slaughter [sslaughter@achd.ada.id.us]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 11:03 AM
To: Will Berg
Subject: RE: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
Attachments: Meridian City Joint Meeting Agenda.doc
Attached is a draft of the agenda for next Monday's joint meeting. Please let me know if there are any
changes/deletions or additions.
Page 1 of 1
From: Will Berg [mailto:bergw@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 8:58 AM
To: Tammy de Weerd; Joe Borton; Keith Bird; Charlie Rountree
Cc: canninga@meridiancity.org; Matthew Ellsworth; Peter Friedman; watsonb@meridiancity.org; Len Grady;
musserb@meridiancity.org; Bob Stowe; John Overton - Police; Bill Nary; Peggy Gardner; Shaun Wardle
Subject: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
It is time for a joint meeting with ACHD. It is scheduled for Monday, January 8, 2007 at noon at ACHD. We need
some agenda items. Please get them to me by Friday. Thanks..... Will
Some items for discussion:
-- update on the Five Year Work Plan
-- status on impact fee collection
1/2/2007
• • Pagel of 2
Will Berg
From: Tara Green
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 9:19 AM
To: Will Berg; Sharon Smith
Subject: FW: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
From: Peter Friedman
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 9:16 AM
To: Tara Green
Subject: FW: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
Tara:
Here are the agenda items I sent to will last week. I spoke with Bill and we can put the Ten Mile update on the
agenda. Again, I don't know if Will included this material.
Thanks
Pete
Pete Friedman, AICP
Comprehensive Planning Manager
City of Meridian Planning Dept.
660 E. Watertower, Suite 202
Meridian, ID 83642
208.884.5533
From: Peter Friedman
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 9:44 AM
To: Will Berg; Tammy de Weerd
Cc: Anna Canning; Matthew Ellsworth; Brad Watson; Len Grady; Bill Musser; Bob Stowe; John Overton - Police;
Bill Nary; Peggy Gardner; Shaun Wardle; Ronaldo Coulter
Subject: RE: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
Will,
Prior to receiving the draft agenda, we had put together a list of suggested joint meeting topics that we are
planning to run by Council on the 2nd. The topics are: Update on the Split Corridor, Phase 1; report on TLIP
( Transportation Land Use Integration Plan); Update on the FYWP; and an update on the Ten Mile Interchange
Area Specific Plan. Since the agenda looks fairly weighty, I wonder if there is anything ACHD can defer. If we
have to, we could defer the TLIP briefing and as noted, ACHD already has the Five Year Work Program on the
agenda.
I need to coordinate with Bill on the Ten Mile Specific Plan, since the City has an active application in the area
that the Council has not reviewed.
Please give me a call if you have any questions.
Thanks
1/2/2007
• • Page 2 of 2
Pete
Pete Friedman, AICP
Comprehensive Planning Manager
City of Meridian Planning Dept.
660 E. Watertower, Suite 202
Meridian, ID 83642
208.884.5533
From: Will Berg
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 8:58 AM
To: Tammy de Weerd; Joe Borton; Keith Bird; Charlie Rountree
Cc: Anna Canning (canninga@meridiancity.org); Matthew Ellsworth; Peter Friedman; Brad Watson
(watsonb@meridiancity.org); Len Grady; Bill Musser (musserb@meridiancity.org); Bob Stowe; John Overton -
Police; Bill Nary; Peggy Gardner; Shaun Wardle
Subject: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
It is time for a joint meeting with ACHD. It is scheduled for Monday, January 8, 2007 at noon at ACHD. We need
some agenda items. Please get them to me by Friday. Thanks.... Will
Some items for discussion:
-- update on the Five Year Work Plan
— status on impact fee collection
1/2/2007
0 • Page 1 of 1
Will Berg
From: Peter Friedman
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 3:27 PM
To: Will Berg
Subject: City Council- ACHD Meeting
Will,
I met with Bill and you can include an Update on the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan on the agenda for
the joint meeting.
Thanks
Pete
Pete Friedman, AICP
Comprehensive Planning Manager
City of Meridian Planning Dept.
660 E. Watertower, Suite 202
Meridian, ID 83642
208.884.5533
12/28/2006
0 • Page 1 of 1
Will Berg
From: Peter Friedman
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 3:26 PM
To: Tara Green
Cc: Will Berg; Sharon Smith
Subject: Council Agenda -1-2-07
Tara:
Under Department Reports we will have "Proposed City Council —ACHD Commission Joint Meeting Topics". Will
sent me a proposed agenda yesterday, and I added a couple of the items, so you should check with him on any
attachments. I also have to update it so I will email him.
Thanks
Pete
Pete Friedman, AICP
Comprehensive Planning Manager
City of Meridian Planning Dept.
660 E. Watertower, Suite 202
Meridian, ID 83642
208.884.5533
12/28/2006
0 Page 1 of 1
Will Berg
From: Susan Slaughter [sslaughter@achd.ada.id.us]
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 10:26 AM
To: Will Berg
Subject: Phone Call
I got your message — thanks — you helped clarify what the Councilman was saying. Like you, I am checking with
others for additional items, though what we have may be enough.
Susan
12/28/2006
0 0 Page 1 of 1
Will Berg
From: Susan Slaughter [sslaughter@achd.ada.id.us]
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 9:53 AM
To: Will Berg
Subject: RE: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
Do you know what Councilman Rountree meant by and I quote `can we help one another revenue increasing
options'?
Susan
From: Will Berg [mailto:bergw@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 3:33 PM
To: Susan Slaughter
Subject: FW: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
Here is a good suggestion. Let me know who from your agency is involved with this. Thanks... Will
From: Charles Rountree [mailto:rountreecm@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 3:23 PM
To: Will Berg
Subject: Re: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
Will - Here a couple discussion topicsthat may be of interest?
Legislative agenda and can we help one another
revenue increasing options
----- Original Message -----
From: Will Berg
To: Tammy de Weerd ; Joe Borton ; Keith Bird; Charlie Rountree
Cc: canningaCaDmeridiancitkorg ; Matthew Ellsworth ; Peter Friedman ; watsonbta7.meridiancity.org ; Len Grady ;
musserb(cDmeridiancity.org ; Bob Stowe; John Overton -Police; Bill Na ry ; Peggy Gardner; Shaun Wardle
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 8:57 AM
Subject: ACHD joint meeting 1-8-07
It is time for a joint meeting with ACRD. It is scheduled for Monday, January 8, 2007 at noon at ACHD. We
need some agenda items. Please get them to me by Friday. Thanks..... Will
Some items for discussion:
- update on the Five Year Work Plan
- status on impact fee collection
12/28/2006
A • 0 / 8- 07
�iomowv�'eoG�o
INTER -OFFICE MEMO Planning & Projects Division
January 8, 2007
To: Meridian Councilmembers & ACHD Commissioners
From: Katey Levihn, P&P Deputy Director and Don Kostelec, Manager
Subject: Status Update of 2008-2012 Five Year Work Program
ACHD Staff has completed Draft "A" of the FY08-12 Five -Year Work Program. The Commission is scheduled
to give comments to staff on January 10, 2007. Issues in this years update include:
• Significant construction cost increases (20%)
• Increased anticipated escalation factors of (8% in 2008, 6% 2009, 4% thereafter)
• Decrease in revenue projections (-15% per year in impact fees — $3 million) due to current market
conditions
• Introduction of quarterly scheduling as a component.
The revised schedule for the completion and adoption is as follows:
January 10 ACHD Commission Work Session
o ACHD Commission feedback on Draft "A"
o Update on progress of for Draft "Bu
January 24 ACHD Commission Work Session
o Draft "B"
o Final Resolution of major issues
February 28 ACHD Commission Work Session
o Final Draft - Adoption
Cost Escalation
The FYWP typically included a cost escalation factor of 2.5% for each year. ACHD staff has researched the
factors and had discussion with the Associated General Contractors (AGC) and right-of-way appraisers that
have resulted in a recommendation to escalate projects costs in the FY08-12 FYWP using the following
escalation rates:
Year Concept/ Design ROW Const. Other
2008
4%
6%
8%
2.5%
2009
4%
6%
6%
2.5%
2010
3%
4%
4%
2.5%
2011
3%
4%
4%
2.5%
2012
3%
4%
4%
2.5%
PD
3%
4%
4%
2.5%
0 •
Revenue Revisions
Impact Fee revenue decreases account for most of the overall decline in projected revenue from 2008
onward. Original FYWP budget projections were reduced by 15% for impact fee reductions. Draft A was
balanced to those numbers. A $4.8 million adjustment is being made in 2010 to include vehicle registration
fees in 2010 as they were inadvertently left out, then sunset them after first quarter of 2011 (October -
December 2010). This adjustment may allow an additional project to proceed in 2010.
Summary of changes to Meridian Projects:
ACHD is faced with the necessity of delaying projects due to budget constraints. Staff utilized the City's
priority request list and discussion with Meridian staff members to try to "hold fast" on those projects of
highest importance to the City of Meridian. We welcome your input in the event we have not correctly
interpreted your priorities.
Ten Mile Road Projects
Ten Mile, Franklin / Cherry — 07-11 FYWP construction was in 2007, programmed in Draft A for 2008.
Includes intersection at Franklin and Ten Mile, and Bridge #109
Ten Mile, Cherry / Ustick — 07-11 FYWP construction was in 2009, programmed in Draft A for 2010.
Ten Mile, Overland / Franklin — 07-11 FYWP construction was OF (unfunded), status remains the same in
Draft A.
Ten Mile / McMillan — 07-11 FYWP construction was UF, status remains the same in Draft A.
Ten Mile / Victory — 07-11 FYWP construction was UF, status remains the same in Draft A.
Meridian Split Corridor Phase 1 and 2
Phase 1 — 07-11 FYWP construction was in 2009, status remains the same in Draft A.
Phase 2 — 07-11 FYWP construction was in PD, programmed for construction in Draft A in 2012.
Ustick / Linder Intersection
07-11 FYWP construction was in 2008, programmed in Draft A for 2008 and 2009.
Pine / Linder Intersection
07-11 FYWP construction was in 2008, programmed for construction in Draft A in 2009.
See attached two sheets — those highlighted in red are projects that have tentatively been delayed from the
construction year depicted in the 2007-2011 FYWP.
FYWP COMPARISON - 07x11 WITH 08x12
GIS: PROJECT: 07x11ConstYR & Priority 08x12ConstYR & Priority
" .
"lg
2 4
4
�1C sz gP�'
RD202-09 30th Street Extension, Main / State St 2010 17 0 26
RD307
36th Street, Hill Rd / Cartwright Rd
2008
9
58
IRC0087
Cloverdale Rd, 1000' north of Fairview Ave / Ustick Rd
2011
14
' 2011
14
RD202-14
Cloverdale Rd, Franklin / 1 000'south of Fairview
2010
25
2012
29
RD203-07
Rd, Victory Rd / Ridenbaugh Canal
2007
15
2008
14 j
FRD200-02b
,Eagle
Fairview Ave Pavement Rehab #2 (Cole / Milwaukee) T
PD
2009
2011
IRC0127
Fairview Ave, Cloverdale Rd / Five Mile Rd
2011
26
• D
-
8
jRC0130
,Fairview Ave, Eagle Rd (SH 55)/ Cloverdale Rd
PD
11
PD
12
�RC0131
Fairview Ave, Five Mile Rd / Maple Grove Rd
2011
12
2011
8
RC0133
Fairview Ave, Locust Grove Rd / Eagle Rd (SH 55)
PD
13
PD
22
-I
!RC0135
Fairview Ave, Meridian Rd / Locust Grove Rd
PD
27
10
N2
14
-�
,RD195a
Five Mile Rd, Fairview Ave / Ustick Rd
2010
18
Federal Way and Victory Rd
– – — -- --
Franklin Rd and Liberty St
32
IF038
Five Mile Rd, Franklin Rd / Fairview Ave
2009
6
18
RD257
Floating Feather Rd, Eagle Rd / Edgewood Dr
2008
16
j 2008
8
�RC0152
Franklin Rd, Black Cat Rd / Ten Mile Rd
PD
24
PD
3
[RC0165
Franklin Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder Rd
2011
3
2011
3
IRD282
Franklin Rd, Touchmark Rd / Five Mile Rd
2009
4
2
'RD077
Linder Rd, Franklin Rd / Ustick
OF
30
OF
21
�RCO240
McMillan Rd, Locust Grove Rd / SH 55 (Eagle Rd)
OF
36
OF
32
RD205-06
'Meridian Rd and Main Street (Ph 1 of Split Corridor), 1-84 to Franklin
2009
28
2009
6
RD205 07
Meridian Rd and Main Street (Ph 2 of Split Corridor), Franklin to Cherr
PD
5
2012
3
IRD309
Ten Mile Rd, Franklin Rd /Cherry Lane
2007
22
2008
8
f RD188
'Ten Mile Rd, Cherry Lane / Ustick Rd
2009
21
2010
18
RCO297
'Ten Mile Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin Rd
OF
35
OF
32
j C202-01
Three Cities River Crossing Corridor Stud
9 ( y)
OF
2
OF
--
6
RD220
Ustick Rd, Cloverdale Rd / Five Mile Rd
PD
19
PD
24
RD205-04
Ustick Rd, Duane Dr / Cloverdale Rd
PD
20
UF
22
- I
RD222
Ustick Rd, Five Mile / Cole Rd
2007
10
2008
17
RD205 05
Ustick Rd, Locust Grove Rd / Leslie Way
OF
32
• D
26
�RD202-37
,Ustick Rd, Meridian Rd} ! Locust Grove Rd
OF
34
• D
18
1a' y`� 'R y�S
E ;imp �.
kw.5 .. ... +�)
iRD101
HRY!`
Adams St, Veterans Parkway to Chinden (US 20/26) via 36th/37th
. .h
PD
31
PD
32
!RD308
(Hill Rd Extension, Horseshoe Bend Rd / State St
2009
37
r
29 j
IIN239b
36th Street and Hill Rd and Catalpa
2008
IIN050
,Avenue D / E; Main St / 04th Street; Bridge Ave (Kuna)
PD
JIN-005-01
Cloverdale Rd and Ustick Rd
2011
2011
IN281
Fairview Ave and Cloverdale Rd
2007
1.
IN099
Fairview Ave and Cole Rd
PD
PD
IN156
Main and Waltman & Meridian and Central
2009
2009
IIN205-12
'Maple Grove Rd and Franklin Rd
2010
2010
IIN205-118
Ustick Rd and Locust Grove Rd
OF
OF
IN269
103rd Street and Myrtle (US 20/26) Signalization
a–
2008
2008
6
–
1IN205-120
--- -- –—.
Amity Rd and Maple Grove Rd
OF
� OF
IN203-01
i
Black Cat Rd and Franklin Rd
PD
PD
11
10
N2
'Farman and Gowen and Pleasant Valley
PD
PD
10
IN20
- —
IN203-16
Federal Way and Victory Rd
– – — -- --
Franklin Rd and Liberty St
PD
–
20115-04
PD
-
16
1
IIN071 ,Front St (US 20/26) and 05th Street 2008 l 2008
IN205-119 ',Maple Grove Rd and Desert Ave
OF OF ---31- -
1/8/2007 Page 1 of 2
11 0
GIS: PROJECT: 07x11ConstYR & Priority 08x12ConstYR & Priority
I N132 Maple Grove Rd and Hackamore Dr 2010 2010 10
IN202-19 McMillan Rd and Locust Grove Rd 2010 —2012 9
IN270 Pine Ave and Linder Rd 2008 2009 3
IIN206-01 SH 44 / State St / Ballantyne Ln Realignment 2009 2010 4
IN204-01 iSH 69 (Meridian Rd) and Columbia Rd 2010 2010 5
iIN203-25 Star Rd and McMillan Rd OF OF 31
IN023a State St (SH 44) and Bogart Lane PD PD 14
IIN205-03 Ten Mile Rd and Amity Rd 2011 2011 13
IIN203-07 Ten Mile Rd and Franklin Rd 2007
iIN202-10 Ten Mile Rd and McMillan Rd OF OF 13
IN205 90 Ten Mile Rd and Victory Rd + OF OF 8
'IN202-07 "Ustick Rd and Linder Rd 2008 2008 1
IIN202-06 Ustick Rd and Meridian Rd 2010
JN277 Victory Rd and Eagle Rd 2007
k
MA077 Cloverdale Rd Bridge #344 2008
MA202-05 iOld Horseshoe Bend Rd Bridge #42a 2009
MA203 02 ParkCenter Blvd --East River Crossing 2008 1 2008 1
IM1204-02 ,Amity Rd #299 PD
M1203-18 Amity Rd #301 PD PD
M1204-04 :Amity Rd #302 PD PD
�M170 king Road Bridge #336 2008 2008
MI203-35 Lake Hazel Rd Bridge #304 2010
M1200-04 Latah St #390B PD
IMI55 Ten Mile Rd Bridge #210 PD PD
M1203-01 Victory Rd, 1 / 4 mile east of Locust Grove #296 2010 2010
MI203-34
Wylie Lane Bridge # 93 2008
'CGSP206-13
08th Street, 1400 W 8th St / Cherry Lane
2009
6
4
iCGS205-14
;32nd St (E side), Grace / Dewey
2008
14
6 1
�CGSP206-04
iCatalpa Dr, Collister Dr / 36th St
2008
5 2008
3
ICGSP205-14
Hill Rd, 13th St / 15th St ,
2008
10 2009
1
ICGSP205-12
Pennsylvania St, Longmont Ave / Leadville Ave
2008
9 20107
�CGSP205-10
Taft Street, Innes St / Sycamore Drive (north side)
2008
8 2010
8
!ENH204-01
'Warm Springs / Granite Way / Penitentiary Enhancement Project
2007
2 2009
2
1/8/2007 Page 2 of 2
0 0 I -9-a7
Draft 2008 - 2012 FYWP Update: Meridian Projects
Pro ect
07-11 FYWP
Const Yr
08-12 FYWP
Const Yr
Lanes
Total Project
Cost x 1000
City
Priority
Notes
Ustick/Locust Grove
'11 wwflm'11''
OF
7 x 6
$4,038
*Eagle, Victory to Ridenbaugh
2007
2008
5
$5,583
15
Fairview, Eagle to Cloverdale
PD
PD
7
$6,732
13
Fairview, Locust Grove to Eagle
PD
PD
7
$7,054
13
$2,400
*Fairview, Meridian to Locust Grove
PD
OF
7
$6,268
13
$2,435
7
1
*Pine/Linder
2008
2009
5 x 3
$2,967
Franklin, Black Cat to Ten Mile
PD
PD
5
$6,450
3
Franklin, Ten Mile to Linder
2011
2011
5
$5,635
3
*Franklin, Touchmark to Five Mile
2009
2010
5
$6,639
N/A
Linder, Franklin to Ustick
OF
OF
5
$10,187
9
Locust Grove Overpass
2006
2007
N/A
$3,400
N/A
Reimbursement Funds
McMillan, Locust Grove to Eagle
OF
OF
5
$4,565
N/A
Meridian Split Corridor Phase 1
2009
2009
6
$8,706
1
On Track
Meridian Split Corridor Phase 2
PD
2012
5 and 6
$8,838
1
Ten Mile, Franklin to Cherry
2008
2008
5
$18,783
2
Intersections at Pine and Franklin included
*Ten Mile, Cherry to Ustick
2009
2010
5
$8,075
2
Ustick intersection included
Ten Mile, Overland to Franklin
OF
OF
5
$4,154.40
1
Included w/ Interchange
Ustick, Locust Grove to Leslie
OF
PD
5
$3,415
N/A
Ustick. Meridian to Locust Gorove
OF
PD
5
$4.568
N/A
Main, Waltman, Meridian, and Central
2009
2009
varies
$4,004
1
Included in Phase 1
Ustick/Locust Grove
OF
OF
7 x 6
$4,038
N/A
Black Cat/Franklin
PD
PD
TBD
$2,400
N/A
i included wl Franklin, Black Cat to Ten Mile
*McMillan/Locust Grove
2010
2012
TBD
$2,435
7
1
*Pine/Linder
2008
2009
5 x 3
$2,967
3
1
0
• /-9-07
ACHD Status of
Impact Fee Collections
City of Meridian
Historical Trend
• The FY 2007 -1 st Quarter shows a 30%
reduction in Impact Fee revenue
compared to FY 2006 - 131 Quarter
- FY 2006-18t Quarter collected $3.5M
- FY 2007 -1st Quarter collected $2.4M
i
Current Trend
• Impact Fee revenue projections for FY
2007 were $18 -OM and are projected to be
$4.OM less this year
- Staff has revised the FY2007 Impact Fee
revenue projections from $18.OM to $14.OM
Historical Trend
• More commercial development than
residential in occurring in FY 2007
- Residential has provided approximately 75% of
the total IF revenue the past three fiscal years
- Residential for the 16t Quarter of FY2007 is
providing 25% of the Impact Fee revenue
2
0
Current Trend
• Impact Fee eligible projects will be
affected by the reduction in Impact
Fee revenue
MAYOR
CITY OF R!-'_
IDAHO �M7
Q, ( '
/'h� Tr;ensur:e V n��Y
SINCE
1903
NOTICE OF
Tammy de Weerd
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird
Joseph W. Borton
Charles M. Rountree
Shaun. Wardle
CITY DEPARTMENTS
City Attorney/HR
703 Main Street
898-5506 (City Attorney)
898-5503 (HR)
Fax 884-8723
Fire
540 E. Franklin Road
888-1234 / fax 895-0390
Parks & Recreation
11 W. Bower Street
888-3579 / fax 898-5501
Planning
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 202
884-5533/fax 888-6854
Police
1401 E. Watertower Lane
888-6678/fax 846-7366
Public Works
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 200
898-5500/fax 898-9551
- Building
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 150
887-2211 / fax 887-1297
- Wastewater
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
888-2191./fax 884-0744
- Water
2235 N.W. 8th Street
888-5242/fax 884-11.59
0
SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP / MEETING
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
Meridian and the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District will
hold a Special Joint Workshop at the Ada County Highway District's
Auditorium, 3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho, on Monday, January
8, 2007 at 12:00 noon. They will be discussing the following issues:
- Introduction of New City Council Member
Update on Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan
Update on ACHDIs Five Year Work Program
Status of Impact Fee Collections
Discussion of Revenue Increasing Options
Discussion of Upcoming Legislative Issues
Update on Locust Grove Roadway Project
Update on Phase 1 of Split Corridor
Other
The public is welcome to attend.
DATED this 5th day of January, 2007.
WILLIAM G. BERG, JFK, C RK
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners'�,�
All materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the'Gity
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and / 0f'srariN6lsa
please contact the Administration of Ada County Highway District at 387-6100
at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
CITY FALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLERK —FAX 888-4218 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING— FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE— FAX 884-8119
Printed on recycled paper
0
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AND
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING / WORKSHOP
AGENDA
Monday, January 8, 2007
at Noon
ACHD Auditorium, 3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho
City of Meridian:
David Zaremba
Charlie Rountree
ACRD:
Joe Borton
Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
Carol McKee Rebecca Arnold
Sherry Huber David Bivens
John Franden, President
I. Introduction of New City Council Member Mayor
& General Introductions
II. Update on Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan Meridian
(Friedman)
III. Update on ACHD's Five Year Work Program ACHD (Levihn)
IV. Status of Impact Fee Collections ACHD (Brokaw)
V. Discussion of Revenue Increasing Options Elected Officials
VI. Discussion of Upcoming Legislative Issues Elected Officials
VII. Update on Locust Grove Roadway Project ACHD
VIII. Update on Phase 1 of Split Corridor ACHD (Bledsoe)
(Two lanes of north bound traffic on Main from
Franklin to Pine with discussion of signals at Pine and Idaho)
IX. Other (time permitting)
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners — January 8, 2007 Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the City of Meridian and ACHD.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings,
please contact the Administrative Office of ACHD at 387-6100 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
�t easy
I.
Posh- %611 C NOArcCC 11-0i I t SOF
IDAHO
SINCF
MAYOR
7993
NOTICE OF SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP / MEETING
Tammy de Weerd
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
Keith Bird
&
Joseph W. Borton
Charles M. Rountree
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS
Shaun Wardle
CITY DEPARTMENTS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
City Attorney/HR
703 Main Street
Meridian and the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District will
898-5506 (City Attorney)
898-5503 (HR)
hold a Special Joint Workshop at the Ada County Highway District's
Fax 884-8723
Fire
Auditorium, 3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho, on Monday, January
540 E. Franklin Road
888-1234 /fax 895-0390
S, 2007 at 12:00 noon. They will be discussing the following issues:
Parks & Recreation
11 W. Bower Street
888-3579 / fax 898-5501
"' Introduction of New City Council Member
Planning
- Update on Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 202
- Update on ACHDIs Five Year Work Program
884-5533/fax 888-6854
Police
- Status of Impact Fee Collections
1401 E. Watertower Lane
888-6678 / fax 846-7366
Discussion Of Revenue Increasing Options
Public Works
- Discussion of Upcoming Legislative Issues
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 200
- Update on Locust Grove Roadway Project
898-5500/fax 898-9551
- Building
- Update on Phase 1 of Split Corridor
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 150
— Other \ ��tlrls9l:It;1,
887-2211 / fax 887-1297
- Wastewater
The public is welcome to attend.
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
888-2191 /fax 884-0744
DATED this 5th day of January, 2007. _
- Water
2235 N.W. 8th Street
-
888 -5242 / fax 884-1159
WILLIAM G. BERG, JRA,
�4YNI'l
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners ' ,
All materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the',; ►
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/ oY'
please contact the Administration of Ada County Highway District at 387-6100
at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLERK— FAX 888-4218 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING— FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE — FAX 884-8119
Printed on recycled paper
ACMC PO* �ov puhu-(-, Ndi—ccc iv�G.k lc,.►
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AND
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING / WORKSHOP
AGENDA
Monday, January 8, 2007
at Noon
ACRD Auditorium, 3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho
City of Meridian:
David Zaremba
Charlie Rountree
ACHD:
Joe Borton
Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
Carol McKee Rebecca Arnold
Sherry Huber David Bivens
John Franden, President
I. Introduction of New City Council Member Mayor
& General Introductions
II. Update on Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan Meridian
(Friedman)
III. Update on ACHD's Five Year Work Program ACHD (Levihn)
IV. Status of Impact Fee Collections ACHD (Brokaw)
V. Discussion of Revenue Increasing Options Elected Officials
VI. Discussion of Upcoming Legislative Issues Elected Officials
VII. Update on Locust Grove Roadway Project ACHD
VIII. Update on Phase 1 of Split Corridor ACHD (Bledsoe)
(Two lanes of north bound traffic on Main from
Franklin to Pine with discussion of signals at Pine and Idaho)
IX. Other (time permitting)
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners — January 8, 2007 Page 1 of 1
A I materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the City of Meridian and ACHD.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and /or hearings,
please contact the Administrative Office of ACHD at 387-6100 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Date/Time
Local ID 1
Local ID 2
'" Broadcast Report "I'
01-05-2007 06:26:15 p.m. Transmit Header Text City of Meridian Idaho
2088884218 Local Name 1 Line 1
Local Name 2 Line 2
Total Paaes Scanned: 8
This document: Failed
(reduced sample and details below)
Document size: 8.5"x11"
GTY 4/
C�rr�it�n
IDAHO
��r�MY0.T1atwvc V.mx� itfi
MAYOR I NOTICE OF SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP ! MEETING
Tammy de Wewd I
Crre CouNC[L Mviums
Keith Bird
Joseph W 8nrtnn
Charles M. Rountree
Shaun Wardle
CM DI!CARTWISITS
City Af WmeyllfR
703 Mein Street
898-5506 (City Attorney)
WS -5503 (HR)
Fax a64 -V4
Fire
540 E. Franklin Road
888-12391fax 89,5-0390
Parks dr Recreation
11 W 7lower Street
888.3579 / fax 898 -Ml
Pimtnfng
660 k:. Waturtower i.ane
Suite 202
889.55.113 / fax 88&66.54
Police
7401 G. Watertcwer Lane
888-6678 / fax 846-7366
PuNic Works
660 }'i. Watertower Lane
Suite 200
898-x500 / fax 898-9351
- Building
660 F.- Watertower Lane
Suite 150
887-22111 fax 887.1297
Wastewater
34[11 N. len Mile Road
888-2191 / fax 889.0744
Werer
2235 N. W 8th Street
8885242 / fax 884-1159
MERIDIAN CITY COUNGIt.
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
and the Commissioners of the Ass County Highway District will
a Special Joint Workshop at the Ada County Highway District's
3775 Adams Street, Garden City, kklho, on Monday, January
2007 at 12:00 noon. They will be discussing the following issues:
h*v& cL6an OrNew City CouwX Member
— LOdWs on Ten MIW bflwcheoW Speafik Arse Phar
— (lpdaft anACHDIs Fho Year VA)tit Prograul
SWIM ofhnpastFee CoM C"M
Diisettasion of Revvtve bfpoasbtg Opown
Discussion of Locoatq LeyfahOw harws
Upstate of Locust Glove Raft#M y Phl(ect
Updirie on Phase 1 of SOP Candor
Other
The public Is welcome to attend.
DATED this 5th day of January, 2007.
Mft0 n Cdry Coons $P0CW Jofnt Mserhlp a9lb ACHD c�arodsdonas 2
A8 ntaterfWa preen W atpu6da roesdnge &flet become tits popmty ofdre
Anyone doe ft eo +a"wo dsOm W dsaEtlBls mWedta dpftr )lfs sed/ 11.0
p ft" 0002d Me AdtnkNatratton of Ada Oft* Hiytway Orsarat of 387-81400
at Mast 48 Mus pW to die p&* meeft
Cr1Y MALL 33 EAs'r 1.DAt'10 Avr..wuE IVIlilttDlAw, 1DA io 83642 (208)W8-4433
CI?YLISRK-FAx8084218 19NANCE@ UnUlY arLUNC-FAx W74813 MAYOWSO FIa-FAX MAIN
Pdnted m ftgt a pp.
TMA Pane rnnflirmcrl • 49n
No.
Job
Remote Station
Start Time
Duration
Pages
Line
Mode
Job Type
Results
001
511
3810160
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
00:00:00
0/8
1
—
HS
FA
002
511
8989551
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
00:02:12
8/8
1
EC
HS
CP21600
003
511
8848723
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
00:03:18
8/8
1
EC
HS
CP14400
004
511
8886854
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
00:01:47
8/8
1
EC
HS
CP31200
005
511
8985501
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
00:03:18
8/8
1
EC
HS
CP14400
006
511
8467366
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
00:01:50
8/8
1
EC
HS
CP28800
007
1511
8950390
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
00:01:45
8/8
1
EC
HS
CP31200
Datefrime
Local ID 1
Local ID 2
01-05-2007
2088884218
Broadcast Report
06:26:24 p.m. Transmit Header Text
Local Name 1
Local Name 2
"'
City of Meridian Idaho
Line 1
Line 2
Remote Station
Start Time
Pages
Line
Mode
Job Type
Results
208 888 2682
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
jDuration
1:43 8/8
1
EC
HS
CP33600
"51,
8840745
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
1:46 8/8
1
EC
HS
CP31200
2088885052
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
1:45 8/8
1
EC
HS
CP31200
8881983
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
00.01:49 8/8
1
EC
HS
CP28800
012 511
2083776449
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
00:03:18 $!8
1
EC
HS
CP14400
013 511
4679562
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
00:01:56T/8
1
EC
HS
CP26400
014 511
2088886701
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
00:01:43 8/8
1
EC
HS
CP31200
015 511
8841159
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
00:01:51 8/8
1
EC
HS
CP28800
016 511
2088840744
05:45:14 p.m. 01-05-2007
00:02:10
EC
HS
CP28800
Abbreviations:
HS: Host send
PL: Polled local MP: Mailbox
print TU: Terminated by user
HR: Host receive
PR: Polled remote CP: Completed TS: Terminated
by system
G3: Group 3
WS: Waiting send MS: Mailbox
save FA: Fail
RP: Report
EC: Error Correct
r 0
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AND
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING / WORKSHOP
AGENDA
Monday, January 8, 2007
at Noon
ACHD Auditorium, 3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho
City of Meridian:
David Zaremba
Charlie Rountree
ACRD:
Joe Borton
Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
Carol McKeIft
e Rebecca Arnold
Sherry Huber David Bivens
John Franden, President
Introduction of New City Council Member Mayor
& General Introductions
II. Update on Ten Mile Interchange Speck Area Plan Meridian
(Friedman)
III. Update on ACHD's Five Year Work Program ACHD (Levihn)
IV. Status of Impact Fee Collections ACRD (Brokaw)
V. Discussion of Revenue Increasing Options Elected Officials
VI. Discussion of Upcoming Legislative Issues Elected Officials
VII. Update on Locust Grove Roadway Project ACHD
VIII. Update on Phase 1 of Split Corridor ACRD (Bledsoe)
(Two lanes of north bound traffic on Main from
Franklin to Pine with discussion of signals at Pine and Idaho)
IX. Other (time permitting)
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners - January 8, 2007 page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the City of Meridian and ACHD.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and / or hearings,
please contact the Administrative Otiice of ACHD at 367-6100 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting,
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AND
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING / WORKSHOP
AGENDA
Monday, January 8, 2007
at Noon
ACHD Auditorium, 3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho
City of Meridian:
David Zaremba Joe Borton
Charlie Rountree Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
ACHD:
Carol McKee Rebecca Arnold
Sherry Huber David Bivens
John Franden, President
I. Introduction of New City Council Member Mayor
& General Introductions
II. Update on Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan Meridian
(Friedman)
III.
Update on ACHD's Five Year Work Program
ACHD (Levihn)
IV.
Status of Impact Fee Collections
ACHD (Brokaw)
V.
Discussion of Revenue Increasing Options
Elected Officials
VI.
Discussion of Upcoming Legislative Issues
Elected Officials
VII.
Update on Locust Grove Roadway Project
ACHD
VIII.
Update on Phase 1 of Split Corridor
ACHD (Bledsoe)
(Two lanes of north bound traffic on Main from
Franklin to Pine with discussion of signals at Pine and Idaho)
IX.
Other (time permitting)
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners — January 8, 2007 Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the City of Meridian and ACHD.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and / or hearings,
please contact the Administrative Office of ACHD at 387-8100 at least 48 flours prior to the public meeting.
CITY OF Rill- .
IDAHO
tirt.
TNEASUEte VN-":-'?
Y
SINCE
1903
MAYOR I NOTICE
Tammy de Weerd
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
OF SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP / MEETING
Keith Bird MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
Joseph W. Borton 8e
Charles M. Rountree ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS
Shaun Wardle
CITY DEPARTMENTS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
City Attorney/HR
703 Main Street
Meridian and the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District
898-5506 (City Attorney)
will
898-5503 (HR)
Fax 884-8723
hold a S p ,/ Highway '
Special Joint Workshop at the Ada Count Hi hwa District's
Fire
540 E. Franklin Road
Auditorium, 3775 Adams Street, Garden Cit Idaho on Monday, January
y. �/� Py
888-1234/fax 895-0390
8, 2007 at 12:00 noon. They will be discussing the following issues:
Parks & Recreation
11 W. Bower Street
888-3579 / fax 898-5501
Introduction of New City Council Member
Planning
Update on Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 202
Update on ACHD's Five Year Work Program
884-5533/fax 888-6854
Police
Status of Impact Fee Collections
1401 E. Watertower Lane
888-6678 / fax 846-7366
Discussion of Revenue increasing Opifons
Public Works
— Discussion of Upcoming Legislative issues
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 200
898-5500/fax 898-9551
- Update on Locust Grove Roadway Project
- Building
- Update on Phase 1 of Split Corridor
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 150
Other
887-2211/fax 887-1297
- Wastewater
:.
The public is welcome to attend.
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
ryn
888-2191 / fax 884-0744
DATED this 5th day of January, 2007.
- Water
—
2235 N.W. 8th Street
888-5242 / fax 884-1159
_ _-
//s -
WILLIAM G. BERG, JFK,
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners 2�,
All materials presented at public meetings shall become the of the'Py n
property
so,,.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and /or��i�rin61sr % dW
please contact the Administration of Ada County Highway District at 387-6100
at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting,
CITY FALL
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLERK
—FAX 888-4218 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING —FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE— FAX 884-8119
Printed on recycled paper
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AND
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING / WORKSHOP
AGENDA
Monday, January 8, 2007
at Noon
ACRD Auditorium, 3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho
City of Meridian:
David Zaremba
Charlie Rountree
ACHD:
Joe Borton
Keith Bird
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
Carol McKee Rebecca Arnold
Sherry Huber David Bivens
John Franden, President
Introduction of New City Council Member Mayor
& General Introductions
II. Update on Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan Meridian
(Friedman)
III.
Update on ACHD's Five Year Work Program
ACHD (Levihn)
IV.
Status of Impact Fee Collections
ACHD (Brokaw)
V.
Discussion of Revenue Increasing Options
Elected Officials
VI.
Discussion of Upcoming Legislative Issues
Elected Officials
VII.
Update on Locust Grove Roadway Project
ACHD
VIII.
Update on Phase 1 of Split Corridor
ACHD (Bledsoe)
(Two lanes of north bound traffic on Main from
Franklin to Pine with discussion of signals at Pine and Idaho)
IX.
Other (time permitting)
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners — January 8, 2007 Page 1 of 1
A# materials presented at public meetings shall become the properly of the City of Meridian and ACHD.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and / or hearings,
please contact the Administrative Office of ACHD at 387-8100 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
f
0 /11 CITY OF 4...v:
IDAHO
T1itn3Utt V11 -
MAYOR NOTICE OF SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP / MEETING
Tammy de Weerd
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
Joseph W. Borton &
Charles M. Rountree ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS
Shaun Wardle
CITY DEPARTMENTS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
City Attorney/HR
703 Main Street Meridian and the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District will
898-5506 (City Attorney)
898-5503 (HR723 hold a S p y Highway Fax 884-8723 Special Joint Workshop at the Ada Count Hi hwa District's
Fire Auditorium, 3775 Adams Street Garden City, Idaho, on Monday, January
540 E. Franklin Road +
888-1234 / fax 895-0390
Parks &Recreation 8, 2007 at 12:00 noon. They will be discussing the following issues:
11 W. Bower Street
888-3579 / fax 898-5501 - Introduction of New City Council Member
Planning - Update on Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suit5533 /fax 888-6854 202 - Update on ACHD's Five Year Work Program
Police Status of Impact Fee Collections
1401 E. Watertower Lane
888-6678 / fax 846-7366 - Discussion of Revenue Increasing Options
Public Works Discussion of Upcoming Legislative Issues
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 200 Update on Locust Grove Roadway Project
898-5500/fax 898-9551
- Building Update on Phase 1 of Split Corridor
660 E. Watertower Lane
Suite 150
Other
887-2211 / fax 887-1297
Wastewater The public is welcome to attend.
3401 N. Ten Mile Road Cr
888-2191 / fax 884-0744 ,' `c
DATED this 5th day of January, 2007.
- Water -
F`
2235 N.W. 8th Street_ -
888 -5242 / fax 884 -1159 -
WILLIAM G. BERG J
Meridian City Council Special Joint Meeting with ACHD Commissioners
All materials presented at public meetings shall become the property of the'C�nty rein
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/ o►�i4ggsa o "�
please contact the Administration of Ada County Highway District at 387-6100
at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting,
CITY HALL 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433
CITY CLERK -FAX 888-4218 FINANCE & UTILITY BILLING -FAX 887-4813 MAYOR'S OFFICE -FAX 884-8119
Printed on recycled paper
0
AGENDA
JOINT MEETING — CITY OF MERIDIAN/ACHD COMMISSION
January 8, 2007
12:00 p.m.
ACHD Auditorium
3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho
I Introduction of New City Councilman
II Update on Ten Mile Interchange Specific City of Meridian
Area Plan
III
Update on ACHD's Five Year Work Program
ACHD (Levihn)
IV
Status of Impact Fee Collections
ACHD (Brokaw)
V
Discussion — Revenue Increasing Options
Elected Officials
VI
Discussion — Upcoming Legislative Session
Elected Officials
VII
Update on Locust Grove Roadway Project
ACHD
VIII
Update on Phase I of Split Corridor
ACHD (Bledsoe)
(Two lanes of northbound traffic on Main from Franklin
to Pine with discussion of signals at Pine &
Idaho)
IX Other (time permitting)
AGENDA
JOINT MEETING — CITY OF MERIDIAN/ACHD COMMISSION
January 8, 2007
12:00 p.m.
ACHD Auditorium
3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho
I
Introduction of New City Councilman
11
Update on Ten Mile Interchange Specific
City of Meridian
Area Plan
III
Update on ACHD's Five Year Work Program
ACHD (I_evihn)
IV
Status of Impact Fee Collections
ACHD (Brokaw)
V
Discussion — Revenue Increasing Options
Elected Officials
VI
Discussion — Upcoming Legislative Session
Elected Officials
VII
Update on Locust Grove Roadway Project
ACHD
VIII
Update on Phase I of Split Corridor
ACHD (Bledsoe)
(Two lanes of northbound traffic on Main from Franklin
to Pine with discussion of signals at Pine &
Idaho)
IX Other (time permitting)
•
February 9, 2007
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 13, 2007
E
APPLICANT ITEM NO. 7-B
REQUEST Approve Minutes of January 8, 2007 City Council Special Joint Workshop
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Date: Phone:
Emailed:
Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Meridian City Council Special / Joint Meeting January 8 2007
The Meridian City Council Special / Joint meeting was called to order at 12:00
P.M. on Tuesday, January 8, 2007 at the ACHD Auditorium by Mayor Tammy de
Weerd.
Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, David Zaremba, Charlie Rountree
and Joe Borton.
Members Absent: Keith Bird.
Staff Present: Bill Nary, Kyle Raddick, Pete Friedman, Shawn Wardle and Will
Berg.
ACHD Commissioners Present: John Franden, Dave Bivens, Rebecca Arnold,
Carol McKee.
ACHD Staff Present: Susan Slaughter, Jay Schweitzer, Mike Brokaw, Bruce
Mills, Terry Little, Katie Levihn and Gary Inselman.
Item 1. Introduction of New City Council Member & General
Introductions:
Franden: -- we have known Dave for years on our obviously on our (inaudible)
committee, whatever that means, but he certainly has been a wonderful
representative on that committee.
De Weerd: He has served six years on the Planning & Zoning Commission and I
think David was the logical choice in terms of the new concentration and
commitment that we have in integrating land use and transportation. David has
already showed his commitment to the City of Meridian through his volunteer
(inaudible) of the Planning & Zoning Commission, so we are thrilled to have him
on board and we know that he is still very interested in serving on and continuing
with the committee that he is committed with Ada County Highway District as
well.
McKee: Good deal. Welcome
Zaremba: Thank you all very much.
Franden: We believe there is never reason for him not to serve on our
committee.
Meridian City Special / J0 Meeting
•
January 8, 2007 oint
Page 2 of 20
Zaremba: You did reappoint me a couple of weeks ago and I appreciate that.
That was within days of the announcement that I was being appointed and
appreciate both the city for giving me this opportunity and the ACHD Commission
for allowing me to continue with the previous committee that I was on.
Franden: Okay, well great and welcome Dave.
De Weerd: Mr. Chairman just for the record, we have Councilmen Rountree,
Borton and Zaremba and myself present.
Franden: Oh, I am sorry you needed to do a roll call.
Item 2. Update on Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan:
Friedman: Thank you Mr. Present, Madame Mayor, Commissioners and Council
members. I just want to give you a brief overview on the Ten Mile Interchange
Specific Area Plan, its current status and where we are going at this point. As
you — actually all of you have participated in one form or another up to this point,
but the city actually kicked this process off in August. We are doing this in
anticipation of the construction of the Ten Mile Interchange and in adopting the
word program for this plan the Mayor and the Council saw this as an opportunity
to take our comprehensive planning to a different level and in a new direction —
actually wanting to develop some vision for the area prior to growth occurring
rather than reacting to the growth, so in addition to including your standard land
use and transportation elements, Council also had directed as part of our
development of the RFP to include a design element because we want to get
ahead of the development and we also want to start to foster quality growth in the
area. The plan has an emphasis on — as you will see on fairly intensive
commercial and employment opportunities and centers on medium and high
density residential as well as future transit compatibility. We felt that it was
important to identify a unified collector system that hopefully we can find a way to
either get built or get coordinated prior to development rather than along side of
development and we also wanted to move beyond just a traditional land use
designation and move into some more qualitative standards, design standards
and some policies that would at least provide us the basis for developing design
guidelines in advance of development actually coming to the city. One aspect of
the plan as you will see that is currently getting some attention is proposed
relocation of Overland Road and I am going to be real cautious here and real
brief on that. I know that the Highway District Commission has already seen a
proposal that you deferred action on that. The City Council is about to receive in
a few weeks a development application that has a proposed relocation of that,
but given the current status of that application I think that is about as much as I
am going to say about it. We will just let the two bodies work through the
process in terms of getting back the appropriate responses from the city to the
District Commission. So, with that I am going to just jump into a real brief
Meridian City Special / Jointeetin •
January 8, 2007 g
Page 3 of 20
presentation and then allow you to get on with the rest of your agenda. So, this
is our study area for the Ten Mile Specific Area Plan. You can see that the
railroad tracks form the northern boundary, pretty much that is Lamont Road on
the south, McDermott on the west and on (inaudible) of Linder on the east. We
are at the end of phase four; we are just moving towards the adoption and
implementation element of the plan. Staff has already made a land use map
amendment application to the city and we are finishing our review of the text of
the plan and hope to have that back from our consultants by the end of this
month. As you all know, a designed charrette, which is an innovative process
between public stakeholders, property owners, city officials, elected officials was
really one of the hall marks of this process. It was a four day event that occurred
at the end of September. During that event we reviewed land use and
transportation alternatives. We refined them. We had design alternatives. We
tested them against with people when they walked in, we had focused
stakeholder interviews and out of that process we developed a draft plan. As you
can see we are above working on land use and transportation simultaneously.
The land use plan is built upon a continuum of jobs, housing, more jobs, open
space and transit. That formed the basis of our work with the property owners
and the stakeholders in the area. The plan as we received it has three key
elements. A land use element that as I said earlier really focuses a lot on mixed
use and higher density residential and when I say mixed use that is not only
mixed use residential and commercial, but mixed employment opportunities as
well as higher density employment opportunities. We have a transportation
element that focuses on connectivity, combining accesses; one of our
implementations recommendations is to find a mechanism to try to possibly get
sections of the plan, which I will show you in a moment, built in advance of
development and we are having some ongoing discussions with District staff on.
how we might accomplish this and then there is a design element which looks at
the more qualitative aspects of development and will provide us for sort of the
basis of developing future guidelines so that as development comes to the city
we can give them some direction on those types of (inaudible) features that the
city through the Council would like to see in the area. Again, there is our land
use continuum that moves from low density residential primarily south of the
freeway and builds as you move north through the high density employment and
into medium density residential, higher density residential as well as a life style
center located on the east side of the road. Just briefly working from west to east
this designation is industrial — the railroad tracks up here to the north, McDermott
Road right over here to the west. Here we have mixed office or mixed
employment as it is called in the plan — low density office — high density
residential, the yellow is medium residential — the lavender colors are civic sights.
We have a transit site located at — or a future transit station located adjacent to
the railroad tracks up here in the northeast section of the plan. These that are
coming out that are kind of the lighter brown areas are community commercial;
the darker brown area is a life style center which is sort of a regional shopping
area that would be a mix of entertainment, retail employment, possibly some
housing arrayed in a format that is different than a traditional mail. Here is more
Meridian City Special / Jofnt Meeting •
January 8, 2007
Page 4 of 20
high density residential, medium density residential. This is the high density
employment, sort of the corporate headquarters concept for thinking probably
five, six story office buildings and then transitioning back to the mixed
employment. To the south we are just respecting the single family nature of the
area down here, looking at possible medium density residential north of the
gravel pit and then of course over here to the east we have more mixed
employment opportunities with a commercial element serving this neighborhood
as well as a medium density residential and finally lower density residential down
below and this was the proposed relocation of Overland Road. This is just a little
bit more detail on the land use map as it stands that was presented a moment
ago. That is the industrial and the employment areas in the northwest and a little
more detail on the south. Of course, the transportation element which I imagine
is a critical importance to this group — this map was one that we started working
on and while this map was being developed the consultants were also running
transportation model forecasts and found that some of the circulation as it has
been proposed will come up with intersections that have reasonable levels of
service. This is the proposed circulation plan for the area. The purplish colors
are the collectors — that more pink color is the arterial. You will notice north of
the Interchange shows an intersection fairly close to it and that is actually an
underpass that the consultants are proposing, so that we would really be looking
at two intersections between the Interchange and Franklin Road and we think
that the real key for connectivity is going to lie in that central portion north of the
interstate and it is going to be critical to find a way to get that built or coordinated
either before development occurs and then we received a lot of thoughtful and
helpful comments from District staff and are going to be revising a few of our
graphics to be more in alignment with the designs that the District has adopted.
As I mentioned earlier our consultant has been running transportation models for
the intersections in the area and this is just a possible main street orientation to
the east of Ten Mile Road within the life style center that is one of the design
proposals that is included in the plan. Finally we get down to a design element —
the consultant did provide us with some general guidelines and the ideas about
how we would want to see development to occur throughout the planning area
and we are going to be working to refine those and turn them into actual
guidelines. So, currently where we are at is that we (inaudible) applied for a map
amendment to our land use map of the Comprehensive Plan that was submitted
in December. The actual text amendment will probably submitted by the end of
this month. We are anticipating Planning & Zoning hearings in March or April
and move onto City Council for hearing and adoption in a May or June timeframe
of this year. So, if there are any questions I would be happy to answer them or
feel free to contact me any time. I can also make any of this material available to
you electronically.
Franden: Questions for Pete? Pete I have got a question. (Inaudible) in this
transportation area are you paying attention or doing anything special in your
land use planning as it relates to some day if we ever have light rail and then also
to service public transportation?
Meridian City Special / J40 Meeting
•
January 8, 2007 oint
Page 5 of 20
Friedman: We are trying to get the densities there. We are trying to establish
fairly high densities and make walk ability and access one of the key elements of
this area in addition to planning that transit center in the north section of the plan;
so clearly we are looking to the future and looking for potential public transit in
this area. One of the things is that we would like to see rather than to be able to
either to walk to some of it either commercial areas or employment areas or have
the ability to take public transit when it is available. Obviously through (inaudible)
and some of the other processes that are going on, those are going to be
evolving standards that I think that will have to be married into these processes.
Franden: And then has the design of the Interchange been finalized yet?
Friedman: No, the design of the Interchange — they are — the state is still working
on that. I went to a meeting about a month ago with the public stakeholder group
and they were sort of winnowing down the alternatives and no decisions have
been made, but I think that if you started looking at the matrix, it is kind of coming
down to either the single point urban interchange, the (inaudible) or possibly just
a diamond interchange. Those seem to be the ones that were most effective in
terms of cost, land consumption, environmental impacts and that sort of thing.
Franden: Carol.
McKee: I just have a comment. That is a beautiful plan. (Inaudible--) gorgeous.
Franden: So, at full build out, have you had a chance — is there anyway to
estimate what the population could be in that area?
Friedman: We haven't done that yet. I have got to go back through the plan and
pull that out once we settle on the numbers and the densities there, but I think it
is significant to say that it will be a fairly dense populated area. I think we are
looking at oh I would say a minimum of possibly 30,000 people living there and
quite a few jobs also. So, you know if it all comes together it will be a fairly
dynamic area with a lot of rooftops to support a lot of commerce and a lot of jobs
hopefully.
Franden: Further questions. Dave.
Bivens: Pete is that area that you have in the study is that currently within the
Meridian city limits or is it in the impact area?
Friedman: Quite a bit of it is in the impact area right now, which buys us the time
and the opportunity to be able to sort of time the development and the provision
of services in that area as well as being able to work with property owners as
they approach the city expressing an interest in annexation to be able to lay the
plans out with them and say this is the Council's vision, this is the direction that
Meridian City Special / Joint Meeting
January 8, 2007
Page 6 of 20
we want to go and having that sort of annexation card really helps us further the
city's vision.
Franden: Mayor, Pete when you first started was talking about something that
we have been talking about a lot too and that is trying to get ahead of the curve
and to not have development come in and then we sit back and figure out what to
we build, but most specifically how do we pay for it and so my question is what
commitment does the city have in relation to doing a development, I mean a
growth area like this and having adequate public facilities, specifically the
transportation facilities placed certainly as we move along, but not getting caught
in the age old problem that we have always gotten caught in of trying to provide
the transportation system after we have built everything.
De Weerd: That has been a discussion. They have looked at different
possibilities, I think an LID; there is legislation coming up; a CID this year, similar
to the PID that — what a bunch of acronyms, huh? Public infrastructure district
and then community infrastructure district, so I don't know if the LID is really the
ideal situation because it is a little bit broad scope. But, have you gotten further
with that?
Friedman: Mayor and Mr. President, Commissioners, Council members, right
now the draft plan has a series of implementation recommendations for the
transportation element and as the Mayor indicated one of them, the LID — one of
them is utilizing whatever legislation might come out of whether it is a PID or
something similar. Another one is something the consultant came up with which
is just cost share trying to get all of those property owners and developers to sit
down together and just say okay pony up all of you and let's see if we can get
this built. We think that really one of the critic layers is just going to be that
central area. We think that some of the development will actually be able as you
know to put in some of those transportation facilities in some of the other
quadrants of the planning area, but that (inaudible) area is going to be one of the
key areas. We also know that in other parts of the planning area or other
locations we only have one or two developers that the city will be dealing with, so
we are pretty confident that we will get the road networks put into those areas as
needed. But, it is challenged and when we met with District's staff and we talked
about LID's at first some eyebrows went up, but I think there is — you know if we
can focus the area and if that is an option that we all agree upon — that there is a
wealth of knowledge that we certainly want to tap into and work closely with you
on.
De Weerd: Mr. Chairman staff has been communicating that to the people that
have come in that own property and looking at development around there that
infrastructure there that there is a key piece that it is expected without (inaudible)
going in and so there have been questions about that. We are hoping that the
adequate public facilities (inaudible) that is expected out of the Blue Print for
Good Growth is and will play into the plan.
Meridian City Special / JI Meeting 0
January 8, 2007
Page 7 of 20
Franden: Okay, anything else? Thanks, Pete. Katie.
Item 3. Update on ACHD's Five Year Work Program:
Levihn: Okay I have handed out a memo that is from our shop and your Matt
Ellsworth provided the longer sheet with the summary from the five year program
draft date. First of all I want to say I hope you all had a happy holiday. Secondly,
I want to say that it looks like the agenda is very nicely ordered. I get to tell you
the bad news on the five year work program. Mike gets to tell you the news on
our impact fee collection and then you get to talk about increasing revenues. So,
I will set the stage there. First of all the draft "a" was just getting to the
Commissioners slightly before Christmas so they have not commented on it. We
are (inaudible) having a discussion with them this Wednesday, so it is a very
preliminary draft. Nothing is set in stone. You can read right there at the top of
the memo, the bad news is I think you have all been aware of the really
significant increase in construction prices. We have been struggling with it for
the last five or six bids, most of them all coming in much higher than we
expected, so in this five year work program on average construction costs were
increased about 20 percent to begin with. We have had a number of discussions
with Associated General Contractors and our right-of-way people and typically
we escalate the project in the five year work program about 2 Y2 percent — it has
been such a way off factory increase that you can see at the bottom of the table
that this is what we are proposing using ranges from the 2 Y2 up to 8 percent for
just the one year, so that also had the factor because obviously projects in the
out years by the time we get to them are going to increase a significant amount.
We have a decrease in revenue projections, mostly about 15 percent per year in
impact fees at least 3 million and Mr. Brokaw will talk in more detail about that
after I am done. Then we have actually made some improvements on our
programming and introduced kind of quarterly scheduling so we have a better
idea of when and how we are spending our money. We are also about a month
behind on the five year work program because of all of these factors, we waited
to see what a couple of our more recent bids came in at to try and confirm some
of these numbers. Typically we adopt the five year work program at the end of
January. This year we are scheduled to adopt it at the end of February now. On
the next page, the second page of the memo you will see a highlighted summary
of changes to the major Meridian projects. With a decrease in revenues and
increase in cost and the increase in the escalation rate that has met, we have
been able to fit fewer projects into the five year work program. We have tried
very hard working with your priority list that you sent over and in discussions with
staff to hold key projects or what we presume are your key projects and we like
feedback on that. You can see — first of all this is briefly broken down into the
Ten Mile projects, Meridian split corridor and then a couple of major
intersections. On the Ten Mile projects, most of them have — well the top two,
Meridian City Special / APnt Meeting •
January 8, 2007
Page 8 of 20
Franklin to Cherry and Cherry to Ustick have slipped a year from 2007 to 2008
and 2009 to 2010 respectively. The other three have stayed in what we call the
unfunded category, which means they are out in preliminary development with
either design and or right -away acquisition in preliminary development, but
construction is not yet programmed. Meridian split corridor phase one — in last
year it was programmed for construction in 2009, it currently remains the same,
but I see Mr. Inselman is here and he could update you more. I know we are in
discussion with the developer about up -fronting some of that money and those
discussions are in negotiation and are not settled yet to my knowledge. For
phase two, which was programmed last year for construction and preliminary
development, we have managed to move that up into 2012 or however we are
going to call that. We had a difficult decision with these major intersections. The
Ustick and Linder intersections was ranked number one on your priority list. We
have kept that in and it is going to begin construction in 2008, but later 2008 and
finish up in fiscal year 2009, which just means in the fall of calendar year 2008.
So, it has kind of in a way slipped about six months from what we expected and
that is a lot because some of the projects we have this year are going to carry
over into next year and it is an issue of cash flow and funding. Then the Pine
and Linder intersection, which was ranked third we have had to slip a year or at
least propose slipping it this year. I don't know — your priority list that was
number one — number three, we are certainly open to suggestion if you have an
idea which one should go first or not. You can see on the next page — the next
two pages with all this bright color — just to give you an overall we have just gone
through Meridian — all of the projects that are red means they have slipped one
or more years. And you can see we have managed to hit everybody in the
county, not just Meridian with the projects slipping. I will give you a moment to
digest that. It is not good news. I know that the — I am speaking on behalf of the
Commissioners here, but I am fairly certain they would be very glad to hear from
You if you would prefer to see something not slip and something else slip instead
if we have to continue that way and certainly any comments will be taken under
advisement. On page one you can see that they do have the work session this
Wednesday to talk about this draft. As staff we are going to try to do a very quick
turnaround after the discussion this Wednesday we have about a week to get it
out for our Commissioners to look at a second draft on January 24th and give us
direction on final resolution of any major issues or any input that has come up
and then currently we have it scheduled for final adoption on February 28th. That
is to give us a little bit of time to try to get some broader public input on this. So
any questions?
De Weerd: Mr. Chairman.
Franden: Madame Mayor.
De Weerd: I guess I would like to first address the Council if this could be a
discussion item placed tomorrow night — give you a chance to really look at this
and any specific comments we can get to your staff Wednesday morning, if that
Meridian City Special / Jofnt Meeting 0
January 8, 2007
Page 9 of 20
works. And Pete, if that is okay, maybe you or Matt could be there tomorrow
night?
Friedman: Sure.
De Weerd: And Will will let you know where we can plug it into the city agenda
Franden: Okay, sounds good. Yeah, it is a lot to kind of digest. Katie does
Meridian City Council do they have to be that quick in decisions? They may not
be major decision makings, but I don't know that, but I would hate to put pressure
on you to make quick decisions that you didn't have enough time to think about.
So, the question —
Levihn: President Franden, Mayor De Weerd and Commissioners and Council
members, the first review by our Commission is this Wednesday. So, if you
could give any big issues, you know Wednesday morning that would be great,
but you do have at least two more weeks after that to review that and then we will
be working with your staff to let them know what the major changes were
between draft "a" and "b". So, you would still have time to comment after that,
probably through the end of January.
De Weerd: We will just look at initial reaction.
Levihn: We are sorry it is so late. We have just been really struggling with what
kind of information we are going to use, how we are going to increase the cost.
We want to increase them enough to cover it, but keep them down as low as
possible in trying to work out the scheduling on this. So, thank you.
Franden: Mike, some more good news?
Item 4. Status of Impact Fee Collections:
Franden: It is kind of like we have gotten used to so much growth — there was
really positive dollars coming in specifically from the impact fees and it has just
changed —
De Weerd: Mr. Chairman.
Franden: Yes, ma'am.
De Weerd: With the increase of the cost of construction and the increase in your
impact fees, are they compensating for some of that increase and construction
costs or not?
Meridian City Special / Joint Meeting •
January 8, 2007
Page 10 of 20
Franden: I don't quite understand your question
De Weerd: You just increased your impact fees this summer
Franden: No.
De Weerd: -- then you had better look at updating this.
Franden: There is not only the cost of those, but then there is the cost of right-of-
way — if you notice in that one table that it goes over time it goes up quite a bit,
too. Mike.
Brokaw: Mr. President, Mayor, Commission members and Council for the record
my name is Mike Brokaw and I am the Deputy Director of Operations and also
the Treasurer. So, I am going to give you all of the quick overview of what has
been happening in the impact fee collections and Katie gave you a little bit of
prelude to this in her earlier presentation. But, the first quarter here is showing
that we are behind last year's collections by 30 percent of — and to give you an
idea of that, last year we collected approximately $12.6 million, so we are about
$1 million behind that right now just in the first quarter alone. So, the first quarter
for 2006 we have collected $3.5 million. For the first quarter 2007 we are at $2.4
million and that is fairly significant because we, I believe, had a new impact fee
ordinance that went into effect around October 1St that essentially, I think,
doubled the majority of the fees particularly in the residential side. So, actually a
30 percent reduction as compared to what we collected last year if you take into
consideration the increase fee schedule that it is actually a much larger reduction
than that. The original projections for fiscal year 2007 total for the year were $18
million. Right now we are projecting to $14 million, in other words a $4 million
reduction, which right now we are going to be watching that again in the next
coming months to see what we are going to have to do as far as revising that
projection any more and what we are seeing is that in the past three years,
primarily residential provided 75 percent of the total impact fee revenue and the
first quarter of 2007 and actually this goes back to I believe the last two months
of fiscal year 2006. We are seeing that residential is now only 25 percent of the
total revenue is coming in. So, commercial is really holding things up at the
present time. One of the things that I have heard in some of the economic
forecast from some of our predictors here locally is that they are expecting or
predicting that the residential will pick up the second half of 2007. 1 am assuming
that is the second half of the calendar year, not our fiscal year. I guess the
bottom line of all of this right now is the impact fee eligible projects are going to
be affected by all of this. I think you have seen some of that presentation that
Katie had on the five year work program — depending on what happens in the
coming months and whether or not some of your building permits start picking up
we will determine what we are going to have to do to (inaudible--). But, for now
we are showing a $4 million reduction in total revenue projection. Whether or not
we are going to have to go more than that, I think January and February will tell.
Meridian City Special / J* Meeting
0
January 8, 2007 oint
Page 11 of 20
November and December we are a little more encouraging. We are seeing a 40
percent reduction in impact fee collections, I believe in August and September
and November and December it has gotten a little bit better. It is around the 20
to 25 percent reductions. So, that would have arrived at 30 percent for now. So,
we will see what happens in January and hope for the best. Any questions?
Item 5. Discussion of Revenue Increasing Options:
Franden: Thanks Mike. Okay, revenue increasing options that we might have.
Well, Mayor you came up with one, increase the impact fee again.
De Weerd: Well, you know I know that the cost of construction, the cost of land
and that sort of thing. We have had (inaudible) commitment of the city to
evaluate our capital improvement plans and evaluate our fee structure annually
and you almost have to start six months after you finally had your concluding
action, so I don't know how often you look at your fees, but it is something
because of the volatile market that we are in, whether it is increasing or
decreasing because you find that whether it was a bubble or cost (inaudible--) in
line, you are at least not over collecting when it is adjusted back down or you are
collecting so that you can do what those impact fees were intended to do.
Another thing that came up recently in a Council discussion is what we did in
North Meridian and what we have to start looking at the southern part of our
community as a lot of our — a number of developers donated their right-of-way in
North Meridian and if ACHD doesn't have any comments, I just don't know how
that works. You know we would like to see that donation happen, but then you
have the developers say well I don't know, ACHD hasn't said anything about that
and they are ready to pay for it. In fact, Dan Woods' project — what road was that
on — was that on Amity? I think it was Amity. I asked him if he would be willing
to donate the right-of-way and he said well I know ACHD is prepared to buy it.
That wasn't my question and he was really trying to skirt my question too, but if
we can be on the same sheet of music on this and suggesting it — otherwise, if
we can start saying that it is not even planned for improvement and the only way
this will help elevate that is through those kind of practices, we can't ask it, but it
might be a reason that they can't get the increase of the increase use because
we can't do it on the (inaudible). I guess what we struggle with is the impact of
everyone else around this and their growth and what that does to our roads.
Because it is not just our developments, so what does ACHD do in terms of
impact to connecting corridors?
Franden: Let me comment and then staff may have some comments as well.
My memory is not — I don't remember a developer that has donated land to right-
of-way to us. They may dedicate some right-of-ways as we go, but — and I may
be mistaken, but usually what we have ended up doing is we will buy it either
•
Meridian City Special / Joint Meeting
January 8, 2007
Page 12 of 20
now or later as we go down the road and that is where the cities are so helpful
when they set their piece of properties -- Gary?
Inselman: Mr. President we have had some generous developers donate the
right-of-ways — the Bridgetower subdivision which is very large covers almost a
full square mile in Meridian and they have donated all of their right-of-way along
Ustick, Linder, McMillan and Ten Mile. They are actually extending out the Black
Cat now with some other developments that they have committed to donate their
right-of-way and I believe Mr. Hubble has agreed to donate right-of-way at
Meridian and McMillan with his latest development, the name escapes my mind,
but we have had some — the Bridgetower developers being the largest and a
significant amount of right-of-way because of the size of their development.
Zaremba: Mr. Chairman. Gary just to be clear is that a free and clear donation
that is not in lieu of impact fees, I mean they are not trading?
Inselman: That is correct. It is donated, no charge. They are of course asking
our consideration to take that into account when we consider some of their other
requests, but we do have the option to offset impact fees as other developers are
just a cash payment when we are purchasing the right-of-way.
Franden: That is a good question. Has there been a quid pro quo?
Inselman: With other developments?
Franden: Well, Bridgetower as an example or any of the others?
Inselman: No, the standard practices is that we purchase it or we enter into an
agreement to offset their impact fees — they basically have a credit until they
have an impact fee to pay and we take it off that balance.
Franden: So, we have given that credit?
Inselman: Well, with Bridgetower it was a free donation to the public for the right-
of-way. The only consideration they are asking is that when they want to build an
intersection (inaudible--), get that into consideration when we evaluate that.
Franden: The other thing that we have, Mayor is we just increased the impact
fees. In some case doubled them, but we could actually — to the best of my
knowledge, we could increase them again, but we have to at least take a look at
it within three years. So, we have a three year window in which to look at it.
De Weerd: Because that is how often (inaudible) CIP?
Franden: Right. The thing is is that our registration fees on vehicle registration
will be expiring in 2010, so we have two election cycles ahead of us. We can
Meridian City Special / Jofnt Meeting •
January 8, 2007
Page 13 of 20
only do it at the 2008 and 2010 election cycle to request a renewal of that
registration fee authority.
De Weerd: So, Mr. Chair, could you consider and maybe your legal counsel
would have to give you advice on it, but just to say ACHD would appreciate
consideration of any right-of-way donation that would initiate discussion from the
Councils on if that is something the developer would be willing to do? If that
would be a comment, you know, I don't know if it would hurt or — at least it sets
the stage for what our Council can do on our side.
Franden: Okay. Steve.
Price: Mr. President and members just a follow up with that. Yeah, the historic
term is (inaudible--) and we have now come up with a term that we require
dedication, just to make it so it doesn't sound so bad. But, we have a lot of ability
to require dedication for certain developments as part of the development. We
have done a good job, I think, with a lot of public private partnerships. You have
Pine Avenue, you have got — and these are all projects that we have done with
the developer —
De Weerd: -- in Meridian.
Price: -- in Meridian, yes and I am trying to get in Meridian. Most of them have
occurred in Meridian and we think that that is actually the wave of the future and
it gives the developer a lot of control. They can get the project in faster and
probably cheaper and we get a project done sooner that is needed for a
particular area. So, we try to encourage that through a development agreement
because we get out of that historic (inaudible--) illegal exaction rule and the
developers are happy with that. There are still other projects that would come
along, but we can still require dedications as part of the impact on the system,
but the CIP has a little bit of complexity because that goes into a model of what
you anticipate for growth. We anticipate the growth on an arterial then our whole
impact system applies to that and so then you get into the prioritization and then
you get into a credit thing where it is hard for us to require the dedication when
we have a program and we have a plan, but the thing that we do as Gary
mentioned is that we give the developer credit against the impact fees through
the development and that is why I just explained (inaudible--). But, the other
thing that we can do is for those areas that we don't have and this relates to local
streets, collectors and arterials is that we currently are working on our
extraordinary impacting program. So, we had unanticipated growth in particular
areas that isn't in our current CIP that is a new pop up that is going to have a
significant impact from the transportation system. Then we can require in
addition to a regular impact fee, the extraordinary impact fee for those
improvements. So, we are just working on that. We have used in other places.
We will be flushing that out and we will come to you and explain that program or
just creating a road show and come and do that to each of the City Councils, but
Meridian City Special / Joint Meeting •
January 8, 2007
Page 14 of 20
it is an additional funding mechanism that we are hoping to move towards to help
us cover those costs.
De Weerd: Mr. Chairman. Just a question on the special impact fees or
extraordinary — is there a choice where they would be able to donate the right-of-
way or due costs that they could pencil it out to what would be less of an impact
on them?
Price: Well, the one thing about the extraordinary impact fee program is that it
allows a lot of flexibility between the developer and ACHD (inaudible) to the kind
of components that you are talking about and that you enter into a development
agreement with a developer to (inaudible) those system improvements and then
reimbursement type of — it is like our impact fee credit program. The developer is
still going to be required to go in and make the improvements. It is just that he
gets paid back through the collection of the extraordinary impact fees for that
area. But, those are items that we negotiate just like we do in our other
developments on regular impacting program. We have that possibility.
(Tape turned over)
Bivens: -- no later than every other year and I think that is where we ran into
some problems in the past that it was left stable and we didn't move it up with the
cost of everything else — materials, construction (inaudible). I think we have
learned that lesson certainly like you say we have got it pretty well pegged no
later than three years. Really if we have got conditions like we are seeing,
probably we should review it, maybe not take action, but certainly review every
year and I don't think it would hurt a thing. A couple of other points that I think
are important — the cost of the building materials is definitely down from what it
was at a peak, the building materials. But, of course all of the other stuff hasn't
dropped like fuel — some — cement, asphalt and these kinds of things. I think one
bright shiny point that I saw at the Associated Taxpayer (inaudible) back when
Kelly Matthews worked for Wells Fargo, his assessment was quite encouraging —
(inaudible--), be prepared it is going up and there will be more people. They are
coming. So, we will see if he is right or wrong. He has been pretty right. He is in
the way upward percentage of his projections have been pretty right. So, we will
see how it goes.
Franden: Okay, anything else on revenues? Legislative session —
Item 6. Discussion of Upcoming Legislative Issues:
Franden: Well, not to my knowledge we don't have any legislation that we are
specifically going to be running. We are going to be monitoring, of course seeing
Meridian City Special / J0 Meeting
•
January 8, 2007 oint
Page 15 of 20
what might surface. GARVEE of course will be down there again. I am not
aware of anything myself. Cities?
Rountree: Well, I guess from my point of view, Mr. Chairman, we need to work
together and do a (inaudible) because I know there is a potential for increasing
registration fees, title fees (inaudible--). I think all of Ada County need to work
together to make sure that we can pass it before the state statute changes it. It
may not come this year, but I think are going to talk about it this year. We will
find out some time between now and 1:30.
Franden: Well, along that same line we met with the ITD Board jointly three or
four weeks ago and one of the things that caught my attention and I don't know
where it will go, but ITD would like to share in impact fees that are collected in
this county and in other areas in the state. What that — the way the legislation is
written right now, according to what I heard at that meeting is that we may share
and they would like to have the legislation changed to where it would say that we
will share with ITD. Now, what all that means — I asked specifically the question
are you thinking that that means that we will share with you with what we are
currently or that we will share what is collected above and beyond what we are
currently doing under our statutes? They said it will be what is above and
beyond. But, you know the proof is in the pudding. But, where that will all go I
don't know and then the registration fees as well could be an impact that people
felt that they don't want to pay a statewide impact fee and a local registration fee.
That could be damaging.
De Weerd: Well, the legislation that I had mentioned earlier with the new and
improved, supposedly I haven't read it PID legislation that will now be called — it
is now more geared towards cities. I don't know what ACHD's position on it was
under the PID plan of last year, but it is to pay for off site improvements, to pay
for roads like arterials, collectors and those kind of things so that they can be
done ahead of time, rather than afterwards. But, we may want to keep an eye on
that. We do have a copy of it or you could get a copy from Brian Ballard.
Franden: As far as last year and the year before we really had no opposition to
it. (Inaudible--). Steve.
Price: Actually we participated in drafting one of the drafts last year and support
the legislation just from the public policy standpoint and we saw this as a
mechanism to make sure that growth does pay for its own. One thing that we
included in that was that — the way that it worked was that you would have to go
—but, we were afraid that if the city or the county approved a PID in advance of
making any decisions on the land use, then you would have some bias issues on
legislation. So, we switched that around for a couple of reasons. One reason is
that you can only create your PID after you have received your land use
entitlements and one benefit of that is this allows the land use agencies and the
transportation agency to make sure that we get the right kind of improvements for
0 •
Meridian City Special / Joint Meeting
January 8, 2007
Page 16 of 20
that development and that you would have in terms of bargaining power the
developers (inaudible) financed that project. Do you see the point? They bought
off on that, the people who sponsored that. So, it is in current draft. I don't know
whether it was (inaudible) draft, but we saw with that improvement that that
legislation was a good idea for local government.
De Weerd: Thank you. Mr. Chair, I know that this has also been looked at at the
Blue Print for Good Growth. I think the steering committees looked at it and they
are getting comment from them too. I think it will be one of those tools that we
can use for the adequate public facilities type of theme.
Franden: Okay, anything else on the legislative arena?
Zaremba: Actually, President Franden touched on it and that was the subject of
ACHD's (inaudible) registration fee that is sun setting in 2010 and just thinking
back to the one percent sales tax increase relating to schools and property tax
and I think the schools felt that they had been side cut or undercut with the way
the legislation happened and my concern is if the state increases the registration
fees that the general public understands that that is not necessarily helping
ACHD directive and I guess the public awareness or the help that ACHD needs
is to figure out a way for ACHD's registration fee, not to sunset it or get it
extended without people saying, no we just voted on that. Which is similar to
what you just said.
Franden: Maybe in another meeting if it fits, we have obviously been doing work
on the reauthorization or registration fees. We did a pretty interesting survey 30
or 60 days ago of the public in Ada County to find out how do they feel about the
registration fee? Are they willing to support reauthorization, but also an increase
and so we feel that we have a pretty good handle on how people feel about it and
also at what dollar amount it would be comfortable and if my memory is right,
Craig, it is anything over $50 they are not happy about, Craig?
Quintana: It goes for a doubling of $15 to $40, fairly hefty — (inaudible) for a 50
percent approval. As soon as we hit the magic $50 mark that is the straw that
breaks the camels back.
Zaremba: Mr. Chairman are we also asking that they would support that if the
state also tacked on some —
Quintana: No.
Arnold: No, that was just us, ACHD.
Bivens: The bad news in the survey it shows that — what was it -- $13.20 is what
our $20 is worth today compared to the time when they initiated it. That is the
Meridian City Special / Akeeting
January 8, 2007
Page 17 of 20
bad news. Even though you double it, it's still (inaudible--), but it will help that is
for sure.
Item 7. Update on Locust Grove Roadway Project
Franden: Okay. Locust Grove Roadway Project. Katie.
Levihn: I am here to give you an update on the overpass. I wasn't sure if this
item is the overpass with Locust Grove, Franklin and Fairview, but we have Dale
Carpairs, the project manager to get you that one on Franklin to Fairview. I will
do it real quick. The Locust Grove Overpass — that bid was awarded and being
done through ITD. The utilities are being moved now. They have been receiving
submittals and they say excavation on the bridge is planned to start within ten
days. So, you will see dirt being moved out there in about ten days from now.
(Inaudible discussion)
Carpairs: Good afternoon. On the Franklin to Fairview piece, contractor has
cleared trees and he is out there working on the piece between Pine and Lanark
and doing some other ground work and he is proceeding as planned.
Franden: Completion estimated --?
Carpairs: Sometime this late summer. Some of the railroad track work has
already been done also by the railroads. Five lanes.
De Weerd: Okay, we like you much better than the first several speakers.
Item 8. Update on Phase 1 of Split Corridor (Two lanes of north bound
traffic on Main from Franklin to Pine with discussion of signals
at Pine and Idaho):
Levihn: I have to apologize the project manager and the technical backup for this
project are not here today and did not get the clarification on the agenda item
until like Friday. I will do my best on Meridian phase 1 of the split corridor. That
contract was let for the design in June. It has been underway. It is a little over
35 percent complete. They have been looking at different concepts. They are
close to having picked the final concept and I understand there was some
question that maybe Meridian City Council had —
(Inaudible discussion)
Meridian City Special / Jis oMeeting 0
January 8, 2007
Page 18 of 20
Franden: Madame Mayor are you going to allow a former Council person to
speak?
De Weerd: I guess we will keep him.
Wardle: Mr. President, Madame Mayor, Commissioners and Council members
this is the first time I got to do that. For the record my name is Shaun Wardle. I
am currently the Administrator for the Meridian Development Corporation, which
is Meridian's Urban Renewal District and I am here again in the capacity to talk
about a plan that planning staff along with ACHD's staff and your consultant
showed to us the beginning of December — the issue at hand was something that
I as a former Council member and even just as a citizen hadn't seen and that
was in the current draft of the plan — the main street after becoming three lanes
one way during — in the Waltman intersection continues on two lanes northbound
and the center turn lane is eliminated from Franklin to Pine. There was an
additional discussion about the removal of signalization at Idaho and the potential
relocation of that (inaudible) and I know that is still brought up for discussion, but
one of the things that I want is that I know the MDC Board is concerned with and
the City Council has expressed opinions in the past — that seems to be at least a
change that was worth noting to the overall design plan. Does that make sense?
Franden: Comments?
Levihn: I know that is under consideration; I am just not quite sure where it
ended up since the last meeting. So, was there a concern with it or something
that we should be looking at working towards?
Friedman: Mr. President, Madame Mayor and Commissioners and Council
members, I think one of our primary concerns that Shaun has indicated that — is
that that configuration of the two lanes with the center turn lane was a key
component of our downtown Meridian transportation plan. The key element of
maintaining the walk -ability — well it is sort of that pedestrian atmosphere that we
wanted to maintain within Old Town and to move away from that may have the
affect of just changing the whole environment within there. So, I think our
concern is before we get too far down the road with this design or acceptance of
this design is that that is a consideration that we need to bring back to the table
and discuss again.
Levihn: Just for clarification you wanted to stay two lanes without the center turn
lane?
Friedman: With the center turn lane.
Levihn: With the center turn lane — oh, we thought you were asking for it not to
be in. So, okay we will check into that and get back to you.
Meridian City Special / Joint Meeting
January 8, 2007
Page 19 of 20
Friedman: I think that one of the related concerns with that is — at least what we
have been hearing is this as a result of our recent meetings with District staff is
that with the proposed design of phase 1 it appears that the intersection of
Franklin and Main may fail, although as I understand it now that is based on six
mile engineering's projections even though the previous projection showed that it
is not failing. So, I think there needs to be discussion or (inaudible) the
consultants about the traffic counts and projected levels of service at that
intersection. Because I think that is what District staff's intention was in order to
keep that intersection moving was to take out that turn lane and send three lanes
northbound on Main Street.
Levihn: I hear your concern and I will get with Justin who works for me and we
will check that out. I would throw out possibly that may be an interim measure
because you know phase 2 doesn't come on for a few years and we will have to
see how that goes through for the whole thing, but we will certainly take a look at
the bulk of traffic projections and that configuration and get an answer back to
you, Pete, that you can distribute.
Friedman: Yes, and bring to Council and discuss there.
Levihn: Thank you we like to hear those things before we are done with the
design.
Franden: Mayor.
De Weerd: One it looks like MDC has seen this, but Council hasn't. So, what
would be helpful if it is not unusual practice of unheard of if we could have them
come and show Council what they are talking about because I know that Shaun
as Council President was participating in those meetings, but the rest of us really
haven't seen it. So, if you could do that?
Levihn: We would be happy to do that.
De Weerd: Okay, that would be excellent.
Levihn: And we will work with Pete, too.
Wardle: Just for clarification as far as Meridian Development Corporation is
going to take a look at this at their meeting, just for informational purposes. I
believe one of the discussions that we have had is understanding that the new
information is if the intersection fails, do the two lanes northbound need to go all
the way to Pine or can they transition at what would be apparently the phase 2
option (inaudible) near Bower Street? Those are just some of the discussions
that we wanted to have related to downtown transportation plan that has been
adopted by Meridian and the new current engineering that is going on.
Meridian City Special /Joint Meeting
January 8, 2007
Page 20 of 20
Levihn: We would be happy to do that. I mean, there is no problem I am just
wondering out loud you know if this is just an intermediate phase when they say
the intersection fails. If it's just because phase 1 is done and phase 2 hasn't
come on or if it is looking at the whole thing, but we will take a look at that
technically and work with Pete and you Shaun and work on that. Thank you.
Franden: Anything else? Nope. Thank you very much.
Item 9. Other (time permitting):
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 1:14 P.M.
APPROVED:
71
TAMMY" RD, MAYOR
ATTESTED:
-'A L;�
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK
2 l9 IN
DATE APPROVED
katr�� F'�� ra.4- -res " s��i r2 " d� :.�,•'�.ti�. � % a :�,`� .?7a y '1i
k`•aS• •�p„r , }ra q °� y q•' A -r �l }},, 6 r+ `yam � a 'S. x, a �r a ,[+,ry. ��'4y ° P
�.. 5k - � ?'a tj+i �,�^ a� " t 1'r'+aE % i/4 1 '�• � tk." A '45`' � « r �fl, ry - - � ra.N 4 i+ t�� r ,
$ �rr''q :. .. T v / n y''' rs •. yk .P 3 ar`'
..F .. I'93.�� &4� �- e a��% � /��1{�r-P J"i9'"'V',A'••� �re ,a}i,�r� �.`__ r 4 '� '�°`} i'�''R�`: g :�.,, i � °P r`✓`a y ' ,7 to C
io�pa. t +'
°
"�{7��* > °S,+rP p"��`' ' �ZPf 7f" -if 3 a/g 4'•r t P -4,p S' -
9 ;� •a. �rl�.r af,r�,st,a•f.(.a .c ,(3 -r ,y . _
r VAa .�� �j wa<.ha"',?3':. r3 �'ayi°s,-s'+ '`C`.Y'�3�,. �°_ '' .1[.t��" .; ,j3,.•'p 1.=4°'%'`r rrC�` �r^',S 9d�}' t� a r
,'T`•�, ''a� 5� ��a
AWN'•"'�'a�,•3�r.,'7!%y.(� 4r a5ica/• c r•.. ,Y �t y� 3�� ✓ � r" �J'x �" �' TttiAll
', - . AR
c.z • a.,
�§. T ^� w" ¢*L '°far y'a rr y�C �'"}X' "fira •++ f�`+" n �••'''
7p4L-
�py'- r _` '��'t 'r' r I'W s. - • 1011 ,3 c t`,, ,a z• i
1��` -,�� �"`ut�'.0 Nt�y, irCu� L.,.. ..1,} 1• :?�'�f`J' '� p�'Q'' fl ^asr6'n- "•y/a,R �
!w"�el
s'irc�,i3t. n'�' _ ` 'As#,C'''A- x �"`t`•''{' `' 1 c-„•��4.y;' � , <�� �y • # �� . ,�.�.t�, r h•. y�{r 33'r. ...*S: r'y. y ' .%5
a�•'y`�'�''''hy�`pq�,`,(( �e�''” s�4 ��""wc ,aur r�,,°� .d �•,, $�aJ+#,a- /'+,�r•� �%�� !r)
°YTli a r S:�! .e "i7' °a'`r j it,Fa k';`•, 4 � t � s� p N, c e`
`l p - i .�*� %+.�° d N•.5 .r f � ,M�. ••�$ r re r P GSi}, ty r N+,�,"'+ i r "�.✓ta"+r+f''
: q f•>''5A1�F`,•t_; .'yFy1P' Yli.s„•t�% 'EI p`l. !"% )`°r .,rc"'ry �.r �"'K3 �a .�issrd.' 'F ,drrop'uy '' n•• �df: i, nr',v-,`$�"'� ?°G3-� ,p�s"?��an'� n§*l�¢ �t
iat
...v:`r�...
' to _•
7 9.
sMi
��a • r � � .! o-1 i ` ; ,� : 2''� p �r� . .1
�b•Y: � 4 %h.{ �� � t ';`r*'t-c,'.cd •' r' ,%� Y )rte' .� ��x �'� '% to ��«
•'h 9'�.. Y=•'"`—'�y 's'5t,Sc ,`RFs 6, r.;u.d. :' �r.r x .,,,I .a"• .'S'""
P>r•s 'p'� a 4.
�r �, r f<f'�Jd. t$°. C•i,', 4 >'!.� +..`f. ',w7;' j, '�8°�• r �y-FH r
U 1s$
•'.
{ y"
tro. - E � 3 x�•. �irr .:. $
�'rr
4 A 3 An
.• d Jl 4 +a5�, t ,{ r - R Ya � J% as .L' ` 5'9Yr& ' M D� ."'
'" P• l a r »fir �'`"•p
�t - / ` _, ```+p� *e r,, ,+�';� ,G h. %''u ,. � d. ' ,7 ... 4 - ,, . �+ . .r•,!E. 3 ,.,{� .> G� � i
F
< "7 +' a P f•3' 3 �" £ r, r Ayrri' S,Na�s
a !� .5#`� jl:.e EiKyq. fh - r i r v;':V, • .^7 ra 'e •�°P �, .atc a
r+Xa �'�Wra 4V+tayf�
Ih -`�r r�,-ty;, �, qa; z� +�• '%r,�.4. � � . �T 7 ay 1a� k �; a
•` �.r R� 2�� ``r �' SLS �� C } � .. l et . .� b , .'
a tai �a} � I' i ,�,y��` ;;-gg; �'� � � :�: ✓u. �,�"���''} �' ,��ti �r ��: - : �- 3 �..
MAE
4'K low v
a +rF f�( t s { P .d � :��^••,� v S 4 . �N` .9�c t� ft r5'F y • "r'�
,,G� S+e'�§'6�u� �`` ,� �.rZ���_ t °"�, z. are�J�` '%• .r � �! � � to
� ��ssl7t7'
:r°` %f3�. i 'Ed•> a `" 'i• '. '� ' ':, `^ _ .r, .. a..: .ak. 1-.a%v �k v
y,C r U-Sox":401 ¢• .
i� n4�� %a" �. � - Y •, � �;yah., .fjyr`�j ^�, lJ -
f r�. r/ & r 'slip•`+' `C - '=_'sh,F�.Ip a fir' fi _ ,t{7 • `9 `� s °r
y
1 . rf. �rt a . � 3 , C °�? .�' 3; Ln r ,p•• �j- A° rIr ", .<g a
Y f c 1 t
s Y Y '`f,.r' ^ S Z,a. •a vb7�'l ..r Py ....5' �"`,,. .w` s Z'f .r R,, 1'
R, . r a'u.+'� y F j!'Q b. °u< . v �'Te-i y `•s f;. _ Y
k d
w G �8 1 P "°3 is , S�.�rt •`� 3 r`.*.`' Yom,` _1 i 7 '�5'+n_L e�,
.,Y e� �'�` r , -.,fig id„ ` � e,,.. � r� sr "•`lt �r f f a11f y ',�J;.,°'t4y., y�le !fl�!! � rs�� � � Zr r .
h ,r J.• P .} 3� +•r ,1 iyj -}ra �`• TFr .� i�. 2^yr'5'
�` i f: .' - ''t G rJ ' ' £ ,s `x -'t" d•{ -1 `' `'T W 0r
°
3.
✓^ � x ���� u r ca',,.�;`1?'�y t a rrar a`°�er `�``°>< �•r.- •ata ' � "�nr°i S� �
J•�}7 •'� .�SY'ad ..+a�,St � �� �p�r'r,`r�r " r7et�'', y5`p ., ,L r•�r[fq .,S � i%Fnv.� `4' r :� �ft�1,?.b>a w'�.k °'r�:a, °�
}
;`1°: � �. ��P „, � } e �r • ; P+` /v -• + ! r � ltgy` ✓ H 7 � >S .4+:,%j
. ; r.{ a rt' �- ` .fi .1 i�Y � � , d 6 � �r ✓'� - a � 'b,.� �y� 4 � n ;w -Y •.r •5.0 `k`r�, T • ��' .r.. K' r ,$ .a.•
�i/,�< . ` • z�r • �,.4 4° drrd•7a 's �it�d y: ; +�}'"�' ra. r u"�a� , � � p�, ,,.�� r�,, K �' ,,.� ,gs. •' m
; r•
L�,y,G
^�.`'`i7 T OO #,
s � ✓4 r i A t p jv� .p '4 �'rj " r a' { y Q !� ri !. { -
i '', •" ;fir. 4 a. �.a a rir,C^�s�' ' ' '�` ,,gni +, t'�}a� d•y6a '' '•
�f{,},•: s, < �S',�^,..rz. '9°i, !`^'f2;,
1''' �•� lye Yns 5 a `.3� .dr'id �`' y "cF r,��..r f "1' r rr" 7• ,, •r� -sy . r y ra v
AA
v' 4 r T! u m s'#y ti o g nr`.i a aE r ark a 3 r s¢ .S y�
r • yy,. 4° s~''I,• TW' ,•ri _ / ``tt,:- .a rte'. bq a r } -'E�,a+_ ,e
1a,� 4f a�
r p a
r: i_a. p;^r,' y.« ..Y-+ {�., a•' d�'°a z,atcyr yr '•�`. 14trr`:fj ) °'+ v #�
a � ` c..� `� _ at`�yn ,fJr ,�:, .Sr' ? t � r' :i 99 - 4a +,x'!•a .Cu• rp � � ;��' �` a' t 'fz�
• e ? ri% r r' vi :C?4G y l 9r.t},(F�° h S�. 9 , r(cri �F" r.•, Ver r �P "6 '�` r as
i �, ,. z: •y,. e�° ' a �} a 1S rc'k�"r& r" ?"��. '. r! p d;., fir, � ,'°,
v
a�'4� P• r � c &6 ,f,r fa�3.•ey.,p. 7r' r'•"•., r}�" .r. r S rd�t.f a .�jrj
�n •. . • r. < ':° • , a . "'F .x .. • �.. e f t t,, t '' s ' �. y , �' ;.s ` ii
p1
a
CL
ak###
u4i
M A
E
m
Ual
Mad
I
I
.. . . .... ..
M A
E
m
Ual
Mad
I
I
L O
-O 4-J
fp
V r- i
Q (n O
V
L
cz O
CL
L
CL
M
�
L
U)
_0
c
fu
Q
O
0?5
O
4-J
L
V
�
�
s
O
=
rU
Q
rl
CL
L
CL
M
�
U)
_0
c
fu
Q
O
>
4-J
Q.
fQ
C-
Q
rl
�
U)
_0
c
fu
Q
O
>
4-J
fQ
C-
Q
rl
ria
�p.
J
g: s
e
F
I
€:
s
�.,.
��
���
��
I
0
Is
CL
c
I
.... .... ....
. ........ .. .. ....
.. .... .. .......
..... . ...... ...
I X.:YEt
, An \ : \ \
-
,21
3
•
9
Ei
i
C
O
L
L
.........
7�V
tai;
a
g.
Lit
I
k
. L-1
. ................
NIIW
-AV v
its
4A
I
I
m
. ... . ..... ... CL
�
��
\
I
Im
I
I
z. mak-
I
m
a�
I
I
14,